Organizations wishing to mature their IT financial management (ITFM) maturity often face the following obstacles:
No matter where you currently stand in your ITFM practice, there is always room for improvement. Hence, a maturity assessment should be viewed as a self-improvement tool that is only valuable if you are willing to act on it.
A mature ITFM practice leads to many benefits.
Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:
This research seeks to support IT leaders and ITFM practitioners in evaluating and improving their current maturity. It will help document both current and target states as well as prioritize focus areas for improvement.
This Excel workbook guides IT finance practitioners to effectively assess their IT financial management practice. Incorporate the visual outputs into your final executive presentation document. Key activities include context setting, completing the assessment, and prioritizing focus areas based on results.
Use this template to document your final ITFM maturity outputs, including the current and target states and your identified priorities.
Technology has been evolving throughout the years, increasing complexity and investments, while putting more stress on operations and people involved. As an IT leader, you are now entrusted to run your outfit as a business, sit at the executive table as a true partner, and be involved in making decisions that best suit your organization. Therefore, you have an obligation to fulfill the needs of your end customers and live up to their expectations, which is not an easy task.
IT financial management (ITFM) helps you generate value to your organization’s clientele by bringing necessary trade-offs to light, while driving effective dialogues with your business partners and leadership team.
This research will focus on Info-Tech’s approach to ITFM maturity, aiming for a state of continuous improvement, where an organization can learn and grow as it adapts to change. As the ITFM practice matures, IT and business leaders will be able to better understand one another and together make better business decisions, driven by data.
This client advisory presentation and accompanying tool seek to support IT leaders and ITFM practitioners in evaluating and improving their current maturity. It will help document both current and target states as well as prioritize focus areas for improvement.
Bilal Alberto Saab
Research Director, IT Financial Management Info-Tech Research Group |
ITFM is often discarded and not given enough importance and relevance due to the operational nature of IT, and the specialized skillset of its people, leading to several problems and challenges, such as:
Business-driven conversations around financials (spending, cost, revenue) are a rarity in IT due to several factors, including:
Mature your ITFM practice by activating the means to make informed business decisions.
Info-Tech’s methodology helps you move the dial by focusing on three maturity focus areas:
Influence your organization’s strategic direction by maturing your ITFM practice.
“ITFM embeds technology in financial management practices. Through cost, demand, and value, ITFM brings technology and business together, forging the necessary relationships and starting the right conversations to enable the best decisions for the organization.”
– Monica Braun, Research Director, Info-Tech Research Group
“Value is not the numbers you visualize on a chart, it’s the dialogue this data generates with your business partners and leadership team.”
– Dave Kish, Practice Lead, Info-Tech Research Group
In a technology-driven world, advances come at a price. With greater spending required, more complex and difficult conversations arise.
79% of respondents believe that decisions taking too long to make is either a significant or somewhat of a challenge (Flexera 2022 Tech Spend Pulse; N=501).
81% of respondents believe that ensuring spend efficiency (avoiding waste) is either a challenge or somewhat of a challenge (Flexera 2022 Tech Spend Pulse; N=501).
In today’s world, where organizations are driving customer experience through technology investments, having a seat at the table means IT leaders must be well versed in business language and practice, including solid financial management skills.
However, IT staff across all industries aren’t very confident in how well IT is doing in managing its finances. This becomes evident after looking at three core processes:
Recent data from 4,137 respondents to Info-Tech’s IT Management & Governance Diagnostic shows that while most IT staff feel that these three financial management processes are important, notably fewer feel that IT management is effective at executing on them.
IT leadership’s capabilities around fundamental cost data capture appear to be lagging, not to mention the essential value-added capabilities around optimizing costs and demonstrating IT’s contribution to business value.
Source: Info-Tech Research Group, IT Management & Governance Diagnostic, 2023.
Note: See Appendix A for maturity level definitions and descriptions.
Info-Tech identified three maturity focus areas, each containing three levers.
Identify where you stand across the nine maturity levers, detect the gaps, and determine your priorities as a first step to develop an improvement plan.
Note: See Appendix B for maturity level definitions and descriptions per lever.
Each step of this activity is accompanied by supporting deliverables to help you accomplish your goals.
Build your improvement plan and implement your initiatives to move the dial and climb the maturity ladder.
DIY Toolkit |
Guided Implementation |
Workshop |
Consulting |
"Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful." | "Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track." | "We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place." | "Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project." |
Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options |
3 hours
Input: Understanding your context, objectives, and methodology
Output: ITFM maturity assessment stakeholders and their objectives, ITFM maturity assessment methodology, ITFM maturity assessment takers
Materials: 1a. Prepare for Assessment tab in the ITFM Maturity Assessment Tool
Participants: CIO/IT director, CFO/finance director, IT finance lead, IT audit lead, Other IT management
Download the IT Financial Management Maturity Assessment Tool
Refer to the example and guidelines below on how to document stakeholders, objectives, and methodology (table range: columns B to G and rows 8 to 15).
Column ID | Input Type | Guidelines |
B | Formula | Automatic calculation, no entry required. |
C | Text | Enter the full name of each stakeholder on a separate row. |
D | Text | Enter the job title related to each stakeholder. |
E | Text | Enter the objective(s) related to each stakeholder. |
F | Text | Enter the agreed upon methodology. |
G | Text | Enter any notes or comments per stakeholder (optional). |
Download the IT Financial Management Maturity Assessment Tool
Refer to the example and guidelines below on how to document assessment takers (table range: columns B to E and rows 18 to 25).
Column ID | Input Type | Guidelines |
B | Formula | Automatic calculation, no entry required. |
C | Text | Enter the full name of each assessment taker on a separate row. |
D | Text | Enter the job title related to each stakeholder to identify which party is being represented per assessment taker. |
E | Text | Enter any notes or comments per stakeholder (optional). |
Download the IT Financial Management Maturity Assessment Tool
3 hours
Input: Understanding of your ITFM current state and 12-month target state, ITFM maturity assessment results
Output: ITFM current- and target-state maturity levels, average scores, and variance, ITFM current- and target-state average scores, variance, and priority by maturity focus area and maturity lever
Materials: 1b. Glossary, 2a. Assess ITFM Foundation, 2b. Assess Mngt. & Monitoring, 2c. Assess Language, and 3. Assessment Summary tabs in the ITFM Maturity Assessment Tool
Participants: CIO/IT director, CFO/finance director, IT finance lead, IT audit lead, Other IT management
Download the IT Financial Management Maturity Assessment Tool
Refer to the example and guidelines below on how to complete the survey.
Column ID | Input Type | Guidelines |
B | Formula | Automatic calculation, no entry required. |
C | Formula | Automatic calculation, no entry required: ITFM maturity statement to assess. |
D, E | Dropdown | Select the maturity levels of your current and target states. One of five maturity levels for each statement, from “1. Nonexistent” (lowest maturity) to “5. Advanced” (highest maturity). |
F, G, H | Formula | Automatic calculation, no entry required: scores associated with your current and target state selection, along with related variance (column G – column F). |
I | Text | Enter any notes or comments per ITFM maturity statement (optional). |
Download the IT Financial Management Maturity Assessment Tool
Refer to the example and guidelines below on how to review your results.
Column ID | Input Type | Guidelines |
K | Formula | Automatic calculation, no entry required. |
L | Formula | Automatic calculation, no entry required: Current State, Target State, and Variance entries. Please ignore the current state benchmark, it’s a placeholder for future reference. |
M | Formula | Automatic calculation, no entry required: average overall maturity score for your Current State and Target State entries, along with related Variance. |
N, O | Formula | Automatic calculation, no entry required: maturity level and related name based on the overall average score (column M), where level 1 corresponds to an average score less than or equal to 1.49, level 2 corresponds to an average score between 1.5 and 2.49 (inclusive), level 3 corresponds to an average score between 2.5 and 3.49 (inclusive), level 4 corresponds to an average score between 3.5 and 4.49 (inclusive), and level 5 corresponds to an average score between 4.5 and 5 (inclusive). |
P, Q | Formula | Automatic calculation, no entry required: maturity definition and related description based on the maturity level (column N). |
Download the IT Financial Management Maturity Assessment Tool
Refer to the example and guidelines below on how to review your results per maturity focus area and maturity lever, then prioritize accordingly.
Column ID | Input Type | Guidelines |
B | Formula | Automatic calculation, no entry required. |
C | Formula | Automatic calculation, no entry required: ITFM maturity focus area or lever, depending on the table. |
D | Placeholder | Ignore this column because it’s a placeholder for future reference. |
E, F, G | Formula | Automatic calculation, no entry required: average score related to the current state and target state, along with the corresponding variance per maturity focus area or lever (depending on the table). |
H | Formula | Automatic calculation, no entry required: preliminary priority based on the average variance (column G), where Low corresponds to an average variance between 0 and 0.5 (inclusive), Medium corresponds to an average variance between 0.51 and 0.99 (inclusive), and High corresponds to an average variance greater than or equal to 1. |
J | Dropdown | Select your final priority (Low, Medium, or High) per ITFM maturity focus area or lever, depending on the table. |
K | Whole Number | Enter the appropriate rank based on your priorities; do not use the same number more than once. A whole number between 1 and 3 to rank ITFM maturity focus areas, and between 1 and 9 to rank ITFM maturity levers, depending on the table. |
Download the IT Financial Management Maturity Assessment Tool
3 hours
Input: ITFM maturity assessment results
Output: Customized ITFM maturity assessment report
Materials: 3. Assessment Summary tab in the ITFM Maturity Assessment Tool, ITFM Maturity Assessment Report Template
Participants: CIO/IT director, CFO/finance director, IT finance lead, IT audit lead, Other IT management
Download the IT Financial Management Maturity Assessment Tool
Refer to the example below on charts depicting different views of the maturity assessment results across the three focus areas and nine levers.
Download the IT Financial Management Maturity Assessment Tool
Refer to the example below on slides depicting different views of the maturity assessment results across the three maturity focus areas and nine maturity levers.
Slide 6: Edit levels based on your assessment results. Copy and paste the appropriate maturity level definition and description from slide 4.
Slide 7: Copy related charts from the assessment summary tab in the Excel workbook and remove the chart title. You can use the “Outer Offset: Bottom” shadow under shape effects on the chart.
Slide 8: Copy related charts from the assessment summary tab in the Excel workbook and remove the chart title and legend. You can use the “Outer Offset: Center” shadow under shape effects on the chart.
Download the IT Financial Management Maturity Assessment Report Template
Communicate your maturity results with stakeholders and develop an actionable ITFM improvement plan.
And remember, having informed discussions with your business partners and stakeholders, where technology helps propel your organization forward, is priceless!
Dave Kish
Practice Lead, ITFM Practice Info-Tech Research Group |
|
Jennifer Perrier
Principal Research Director, ITFM Practice Info-Tech Research Group |
|
Angie Reynolds
Principal Research Director, ITFM Practice Info-Tech Research Group |
|
Monica Braun
Research Director, ITFM Practice Info-Tech Research Group |
|
Rex Ding
Research Specialist, ITFM Practice Info-Tech Research Group |
|
Aman Kumari
Research Specialist, ITFM Practice Info-Tech Research Group |
Amy Byalick
Vice President, IT Finance Info-Tech Research Group |
Amy Byalick is an IT Finance practitioner with 15 years of experience supporting CIOs and IT leaders elevating the IT financial storytelling and unlocking insights. Amy is currently working at Johnson Controls as the VP, IT Finance, previously working at PepsiCo, AmerisourceBergen, and Jacobs. | |
Carol Carr
Technical Counselor, Executive Services Info-Tech Research Group |
||
Scott Fairholm
Executive Counselor, Executive Services Info-Tech Research Group |
||
Gokul Rajan
Executive Counselor, Executive Services Info-Tech Research Group |
||
Allison Kinnaird
Practice Lead, Infrastructure & Operations Info-Tech Research Group |
||
Isabelle Hertanto
Practice Lead, Security & Privacy Info-Tech Research Group |
Achieve IT Spending Transparency
Mature your ITFM practice by activating the means to make informed business decisions. |
|
Build Your IT Cost Optimization Roadmap
Develop an IT cost optimization strategy based on your specific circumstances and timeline. |
Eby, Kate. “The Complete Guide to Organizational Maturity: Models, Levels, and Assessments.” Smartsheet, 8 June 2022. Web.
“Financial Management Maturity Model.” National Audit Office, n.d. Accessed 28 Apr. 2023.
“ITFM/TBM Program Maturity Guide.” Nicus Software, n.d. Accessed 28 Apr. 2023.
Jouravlev, Roman. "Service Financial Management: ITIL 4 Practice Guide." Axelos, 2020.
McCarthy, Seamus. “Financial Management Maturity Model: A Good Practice Guide.” Office of the Comptroller & Auditor General, 26 June 2018. Web.
“Principles for Effective Risk Data Aggregation and Risk Reporting.“ Bank for International Settlements, Jan. 2013. Web.
“Role & Influence of the Technology Decision-Maker 2022.” Foundry, 2022. Web.
Stackpole, Beth. “State of the CIO, 2022: Focus turns to IT fundamentals.” CIO, 21 March 2022. Web.
“Tech Spend Pulse.” Flexera, 2022. Web.
Maturity Level |
Definition |
Description |
Nascent Level 1 |
Inability to consistently deliver financial planning services | ITFM practices are almost inexistent. Only the most basic financial tasks and activities are being performed on an ad hoc basis to fulfill the Finance department’s requests. |
Cost Operator Level 2 |
Rudimentary financial planning capabilities. | ITFM activities revolve around minimizing the IT budget as much as possible. ITFM practices are not well defined, and IT’s financial view is limited to day-to-day technical operations.
IT is only involved in low complexity decision making, where financial conversations center on general ledger items and IT spending. |
Trusted Coordinator Level 3 |
Enablement of business through cost-effective supply of technology. | ITFM activities revolve around becoming a proficient and cost-effective technology supplier to business partners.
ITFM practices are in place, with moderate coordination and adherence to execution. Various IT business units coordinate to produce a consolidated financial view focused on business services. IT is involved in moderate complexity decision making, as a technology subject matter expert, where financial conversations center on IT spending in relation to technology services or solutions provided to business partners. |
Value Optimizer Level 4 |
Effective impact on business performance. | ITFM activities revolve around optimizing existing technology investments to improve both IT and business performance.
ITFM practices are well managed, established, documented, repeatable, and integrated as necessary across the organization. IT’s financial view tie technology investments to lines of business, business products, and business capabilities. Business partners are well informed on the technology mix and drive related discussion. IT is trusted to contribute to complex decision making around existing investments to cost-effectively plan initiatives, as well as enhance business performance. |
Strategic Partner Level 5 |
Influence on the organization’s strategic direction. | ITFM activities revolve around predicting the outcome of new or potential technology investments to continuously optimize business performance.
ITFM practices are fully optimized, reviewed, and improved in a continuous and sustainable manner, and related execution is tracked by gathering qualitative and quantitative feedback. IT’s financial view is holistic and fully integrated with the business, with an outlook on innovation, growth, and strategic transformation. Business and IT leaders know the financial ramifications of every business and technology investment decision. IT is trusted to contribute to strategic decision making around potential and future investments to grow and transform the business. |
Maturity Level | Definition | Description |
Nascent Level 1 | Inability to provide any type of financial insight. | ITFM tasks, activities, and functions are not being met in any way, shape, or form. |
Cost Operator Level 2 | Ability to provide basic financial insights. | There is no dedicated ITFM team.
|
Trusted Coordinator Level 3 | Ability to provide basic business insights. | A dedicated team is fulfilling essential ITFM tasks, activities, and functions.
|
Value Optimizer Level 4 | Ability to provide valuable business driven insights. | A dedicated ITFM team with well-defined roles and responsibilities can provide effective advice to IT leaders, in a timely fashion, and positively influence IT decisions. |
Strategic Partner Level 5 | Ability to influence both technology and business decisions. | A dedicated and highly specialized ITFM team is trusted and valued by both IT and Business leaders.
|
Maturity Level | Definition | Description |
Nascent Level 1 | Inability to ensure any adherence to rules and regulations. | ITFM frameworks, guidelines, policies, and procedures are not developed nor documented. |
Cost Operator Level 2 | Ability to ensure basic adherence to rules and regulations. | Basic ITFM frameworks, guidelines, policies, and procedures are in place, developed on an ad hoc basis, with no apparent coherence or complete documentation. |
Trusted Coordinator Level 3 | Ability to ensure compliance to rules and regulations, as well as accountability across ITFM processes. | Essential ITFM frameworks, guidelines, policies, and procedures are in place, coherent, and documented, aiming to (a) comply with rules and regulations, and (b) provide clear accountability. |
Value Optimizer Level 4 | Ability to ensure compliance to rules and regulations, as well as structure, transparency, and business alignment across ITFM processes. | ITFM frameworks, guidelines, policies, and procedures are well defined, coherent, documented, and regularly reviewed, aiming to (a) comply with rules and regulations, (b) provide clear accountability, and (c) maintain business alignment. |
Strategic Partner Level 5 | Ability to:
| ITFM frameworks, guidelines, policies, and procedures are complete, well defined, coherent, documented, continuously reviewed, and improved, aiming to (a) comply with rules and regulations, (b) provide clear accountability, (c) maintain business alignment, and (d) facilitate the decision-making process.
|
Maturity Level | Definition | Description |
Nascent Level 1 | Inability to deliver IT financial planning and performance output. | ITFM processes and tools are not developed nor documented. |
Cost Operator Level 2 | Ability to deliver basic IT financial planning output. | Basic ITFM processes and tools are in place, developed on an ad hoc basis, with no apparent coherence or complete documentation. |
Trusted Coordinator Level 3 | Ability to deliver accurate IT financial output and basic IT performance output in a consistent cadence. | Essential ITFM processes and tools are in place, coherent, and documented, aiming to (a) maintain integrity across activities, tasks, methodologies, data, and reports; (b) deliver IT financial planning and performance output needed by stakeholders; and (c) provide clear accountability. ITFM tools and processes are adopted by the ITFM team and some IT business units but are not fully integrated. |
Value Optimizer Level 4 | Ability to deliver accurate IT financial planning and performance output at the needed level of detail to stakeholders in a consistent cadence. | ITFM processes and tools are complete, well defined, coherent, documented, continuously reviewed, and improved, aiming to (a) maintain integrity across activities, tasks, methodologies, data, and reports; (b) deliver IT financial planning and performance output needed by stakeholders; (c) provide clear accountability; and (d) facilitate decision-making. ITFM tools and processes are adopted by IT and business partners but are not fully integrated. |
Strategic Partner Level 5 | Ability to:
| ITFM processes and tools are complete, well defined, coherent, documented, continuously reviewed, and improved, aiming to (a) maintain integrity across activities, tasks, methodologies, data, and reports; (b) deliver IT financial planning and performance output needed by stakeholders; (c) provide clear accountability; and (d) facilitate decision making.
|
Maturity Level | Definition | Description |
Nascent Level 1 | Inability to provide transparency across technology spending. | ITFM taxonomy and data model are not developed nor documented. |
Cost Operator Level 2 | Ability to provide transparency and support IT financial planning data, analysis, and reporting needs of finance stakeholders. | ITFM taxonomy and data model are in place, developed on an ad hoc basis, with no apparent coherence or complete documentation, to comply with, and meet the needs of finance stakeholders. |
Trusted Coordinator Level 3 | Ability to provide transparency and support IT financial planning and performance data, analysis, and reporting needs of IT and finance stakeholders. | ITFM taxonomy and data model are in place, coherent, and documented to meet the needs of IT and finance stakeholders. |
Value Optimizer Level 4 | Ability to provide transparency and support IT financial planning and performance data, analysis, and reporting needs of IT, finance, business, and executive stakeholders. | ITFM taxonomy and data model are complete, well defined, coherent, documented, continuously reviewed, and improved, aiming to provide (a) a holistic view of IT spending and IT performance, (b) visibility and transparency, (c) flexibility, and (d) valuable insights to facilitate data driven decision making.
|
Strategic Partner Level 5 | Ability to:
| ITFM taxonomy and data model are complete, well defined, coherent, documented, continuously reviewed, and improved, aiming to provide (a) a holistic view of IT spending and IT performance, (b) visibility and transparency, (c) flexibility, and (d) valuable insights to facilitate data driven decision making.
|
Maturity Level | Definition | Description |
Nascent Level 1 | Inability to provide accurate and complete across technology spending. | ITFM data needs and requirements are not understood. |
Cost Operator Level 2 | Ability to provide accurate, but incomplete IT financial planning data to meet the needs of finance stakeholders. | Technology spending data is extracted, transformed, and loaded on an ad hoc basis to meet the needs of finance stakeholders. |
Trusted Coordinator Level 3 | Ability to provide accurate and complete IT financial planning data to meet the needs of IT and finance stakeholders, but IT performance data remain incomplete. | IT financial planning data is extracted, transformed, and loaded in a regular cadence to meet the needs of IT and finance stakeholders.
|
Value Optimizer Level 4 | Ability to provide accurate and complete IT financial planning and performance data to meet the needs of IT, finance, business, and executive stakeholders. | ITFM data needs and requirements are understood.
|
Strategic Partner Level 5 | Ability to provide accurate and complete IT financial planning and performance data real time and when needed by IT, finance, business, and executive stakeholders. | ITFM data needs and requirements are understood.
|
Maturity Level | Definition | Description |
Nascent Level 1 | Inability to provide any type of financial insight. | ITFM analysis and reports are not developed nor documented. |
Cost Operator Level 2 | Ability to provide basic financial insights. | IT financial planning analysis is conducted on an ad hoc basis to meet the needs of finance stakeholders. |
Trusted Coordinator Level 3 | Ability to provide basic financial planning and performance insights to meet the needs of IT and finance stakeholders. | IT financial planning and performance analysis are methodical and rigorous, as defined in related control documents (guideline, policies, procedures, etc.).
|
Value Optimizer Level 4 | Ability to provide practical insights and useful recommendations as needed by IT, finance, business, and executive stakeholders to facilitate business decision making around technology investments. | ITFM analysis and reports support business decision making around technology investments.
|
Strategic Partner Level 5 | Ability to provide practical insights and useful recommendations as needed by IT, finance, business, and executive stakeholders to facilitate strategic decision making. | ITFM analysis and reports support strategic decision making.
|
Maturity Level | Definition | Description |
Nascent Level 1 | Inability of organization stakeholders to communicate and understand each other. | The organization stakeholders including IT, finance, business, and executives do not understand one another, and cannot speak the same language. |
Cost Operator Level 2 | Ability to understand business and finance requirements. | IT understands and meets business and financial planning requirements but does not communicate in a similar language.
|
Trusted Coordinator Level 3 | Ability to understand the needs of different stakeholders including IT, finance, business, and executives and take part in decision making around technology spending. | The organization stakeholders including IT, finance, business, and executives understand each other’s needs, but do not communicate in a common language.
|
Value Optimizer Level 4 | Ability to communicate in a common vocabulary across the organization and take part in business decision making around technology investments. | The organization stakeholders including IT, finance, business, and executives communicate in a common vocabulary and understand one another.
|
Strategic Partner Level 5 | Ability to communicate in a common vocabulary across the organization and take part in strategic decision making. | The organization stakeholders including IT, finance, business, and executives communicate in a common vocabulary and understand one another.
|
Maturity Level | Definition | Description |
Nascent Level 1 | Inability of organization stakeholders to acquire knowledge. | Educational resources are inexistent. |
Cost Operator Level 2 | Ability to acquire financial knowledge and understand financial concepts. | IT leaders have access to educational resources to gain the financial knowledge necessary to perform their duties. |
Trusted Coordinator Level 3 | Ability to acquire financial and business knowledge and understand related concepts. | IT leaders and their respective teams have access to educational resources to gain the financial and business knowledge necessary to perform their duties.
|
Value Optimizer Level 4 | Ability to acquire knowledge, across technology, business, and finance as needed by different organization stakeholders, and the leadership understand concepts across these various domains. | Stakeholders including IT, finance, business, and executives have access to various educational resources to gain knowledge in different domains as needed.
|
Strategic Partner Level 5 | Ability to acquire knowledge, and understand concepts across technology, business, and finance as needed by different organization stakeholders. | The organization promotes continuous learning through well designed programs including training, mentorship, and academic courses. Thus, stakeholders including IT, finance, business, and executives have access to various educational resources to gain knowledge in different domains as needed.
|
Maturity Level | Definition | Description |
Nascent Level 1 | Inability to provide and foster an environment of collaboration and continuous improvement. | Stakeholders including IT, finance, business, and executives operate in silos, and collaboration between different teams is inexistent. |
Cost Operator Level 2 | Ability to provide an environment of cooperation to meet the needs of IT, finance, and business leaders. | IT, finance, and business leaders cooperate to meet financial planning requirements as necessary to perform their duties. |
Trusted Coordinator Level 3 | Ability to provide and foster an environment of collaboration across the organization. | IT, finance, and business collaborate on various initiatives. ITFM employees are trusted and supported by their stakeholders (IT, finance, and business). |
Value Optimizer Level 4 | Ability to provide and foster an environment of collaboration and continuous improvement, where employees across the organization feel trusted, supported, empowered, and valued. | Stakeholders including IT, finance, business, and executives support and promote continuous improvement, transparency practices, and collaboration across the organization.
|
Strategic Partner Level 5 | Ability to provide and foster an environment of collaboration and continuous improvement, where leaders are willing to change, and employees across the organization feel trusted, supported, empowered, and valued. | Stakeholders including IT, finance, business, and executives support and promote continuous improvement, transparency practices, and collaboration across the organization.
|