DORA - Article 7 — Explained

  • member rating overall impact: N/A
  • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
  • member rating average days saved: N/A

Intro

While this text is about DORA requirements, it is really about resilient availability of your service. Even if you are not bound to this regulation, maybe you are not a financial services provider, the requirements and tips on how to get there are invaluable to your client satisfaction.

Legal text

In order to address and manage ICT risk, financial entities shall use and maintain updated ICT systems, protocols and tools that are:
(a) appropriate to the magnitude of operations supporting the conduct of their activities, in accordance with the
proportionality principle as referred to in Article 4;
(b) reliable;
(c) equipped with sufficient capacity to accurately process the data necessary for the performance of activities and the timely provision of services, and to deal with peak orders, message or transaction volumes, as needed, including where new technology is introduced;
(d) technologically resilient in order to adequately deal with additional information processing needs as required under
stressed market conditions or other adverse situations.

What do you need to do?

  • Determine what systems you need.
  • Inventory the systems you have.
  • Make sure your systems and applications are sized right for your business
    • and made resilient according to the business functions they support
      in relation to the size of the business functions they support (proportionality)
    • and are reliable, meaning they produce consistent results
    • and are resilient, meaning they can withstand adverse effects where needed 

How do you do this?

For requirement (a)

  • Identify the capacity requirements for your services
  • Also identify the capacity requirements in case of serious decapacitating events (Business continuity)
  • Detail your capacity management plan so that you can meet the requirements
  • Test your systems for compliamce with these requirements

For requirement (b)

  • Show the parts of your IT policy that deals with availability, 
  • Show the technical Disaster recovery plans and their execution reports (ideally over a number of years)
  • Show the availability reports for your systems.
  • Show the vulnerability management reports for your systems (optional)

For requirement (C)

  • Show the availability reports for your systems: this is really the end-result: if you can show that your systems are available even under heavy load, you have won half the battle.
  • Show the capacity requirements for your systems. This is where you can prove you really thought about demad for your service.
  • Show the capacity monitoring plans, plans and roadmaps and reports for your systems
  •  Show the load testing reports executed on your systems

 For requirement (d)

  • Show the identified attacks scenarios and you defend against them
  •  Show the results of your resilience test plans: talk about High availability, Disaster recovery, and manual workaround or alternative workflows (that is business continuity.)

Many of these solutions will depend on the the solutions and responses to other DORA requirements.

 

dora

Cost and Budget Management

  • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}8|cart{/j2store}
  • Related Products: {j2store}8|crosssells{/j2store}
  • Up-Sell: {j2store}8|upsells{/j2store}
  • member rating overall impact: 9.5/10
  • member rating average dollars saved: $2,000
  • member rating average days saved: 5
  • Parent Category Name: Financial Management
  • Parent Category Link: /financial-management

The challenge

  • IT is seen as a cost center in most organizations. Your IT spend is fuelled by negative sentiment instead of contributing to business value.

  • Budgetary approval is difficult, and in many cases, the starting point is lowering the cost-income ratio without looking at the benefits.
  • Provide the right amount of detail in your budgets to tell your investment and spending story. Align it with the business story. Too much detail only increases confusion, too little suspicion.

Our advice

Insight

An effective IT budget complements the business story with how you will achieve the expected business targets.

  • Partner with the business to understand the strategic direction of the company and its future needs.
  • Know your costs and the value you will deliver.
  • Present your numbers and story clearly and credibly. Excellent delivery is part of good communication.
  • Guide your company by clearly explaining the implications of different choices they can make.

Impact and results 

  • Get a head-start on your IT forecasting exercise by knowing the business strategy and what initiatives they will launch.
  • The coffee corner works! Pre-sell your ideas in quick chats.
  • Do not make innovation budgets bigger than they need to be. It undermines your credibility.
  • You must know your history to accurately forecast your IT operations cost and how it will evolve based on expected business changes.
  • Anticipate questions. IT discretionary proposals are often challenged. Think ahead of time about what areas your business partners will focus on and be ready with researched and credible responses.
  • When you have an optimized budget, tie further cost reductions to consequences in service delivery or deferred projects, or a changed operating model.

The roadmap

Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

Get started

Our concise executive brief shows you why you should develop a budget based on value delivery. We'll show you our methodology and the ways we can help you in completing this.

Plan for budget success

  • Build an IT Budget That Demonstrates Value Delivery – Phase 1: Plan (ppt)
  • IT Budget Interview Guide (doc)

Build your budget.

  • Build an IT Budget That Demonstrates Value Delivery – Phase 2: Build (ppt)
  • IT Cost Forecasting Tool (xls)

Sell your budget

  • Build an IT Budget That Demonstrates Value Delivery – Phase 3: Sell (ppt)
  • IT Budget Presentation (ppt)

 

Present Security to Executive Stakeholders

  • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}262|cart{/j2store}
  • member rating overall impact: 10.0/10 Overall Impact
  • member rating average dollars saved: $2,000 Average $ Saved
  • member rating average days saved: 10 Average Days Saved
  • Parent Category Name: Governance, Risk & Compliance
  • Parent Category Link: /governance-risk-compliance
  • There is a disconnect between security leaders and executive stakeholders on what information is important to present.
  • Security leaders find it challenging to convey the necessary information to obtain support for security objectives.
  • Changes to the threat landscape and shifts in organizational goals exacerbate the issue, as they impact security leaders' ability to prioritize topics to be communicated.
  • Security leaders struggle to communicate the importance of security to a non-technical audience.

Our Advice

Critical Insight

Security presentations are not a one-way street. The key to a successful executive security presentation is having a goal for the presentation and ensuring that you have met your goal.

Impact and Result

  • Developing a thorough understanding of the security communication goals.
  • Understanding the importance of leveraging highly relevant and understandable data.
  • Developing and delivering presentations that will keep your audience engaged and build trust with your executive stakeholders.

Present Security to Executive Stakeholders Research & Tools

Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

1. Present Security to Executive Stakeholders – A step-by-step guide to communicating security effectively to obtain support from decision makers.

Use this as a guideline to assist you in presenting security to executive stakeholders.

  • Present Security to Executive Stakeholders Storyboard

2. Security Presentation Templates – A set of security presentation templates to assist you in communicating security to executive stakeholders.

The security presentation templates are a set of customizable templates for various types of security presentation including:

  • Present Security to Executive Stakeholders Templates

Infographic

Further reading

Present Security to Executive Stakeholders

Learn how to communicate security effectively to obtain support from decision makers.

Analyst Perspective

Build and deliver an effective security communication to your executive stakeholders.

Ahmad Jowhar

As a security leader, you’re tasked with various responsibilities to ensure your organization can achieve its goals while its most important assets are being protected.

However, when communicating security to executive stakeholders, challenges can arise in determining what topics are pertinent to present. Changes in the security threat landscape coupled with different business goals make identifying how to present security more challenging.

Having a communication framework for presenting security to executive stakeholders will enable you to effectively identify, develop, and deliver your communication goals while obtaining the support you need to achieve your objectives.

Ahmad Jowhar
Research Specialist, Security & Privacy

Info-Tech Research Group

Executive Summary

Your Challenge

Common Obstacles

Info-Tech’s Approach

  • Many security leaders struggle to decide what to present and how to present security to executive stakeholders.
  • Constant changes in the security threat landscape impacts a security leader’s ability to prioritize topics to be communicated.
  • There is a disconnect between security leaders and executive stakeholders on what information is important to present.
  • Security leaders struggle to communicate the importance of security to a non-technical audience.
  • Developing a thorough understanding of security communication goals.
  • Understanding the importance of leveraging highly relevant and understandable data.
  • Developing and delivering presentations that will keep your audience engaged and build trust with your executive stakeholders.

Info-Tech Insight

Security presentations are not a one-way street. The key to a successful executive security presentation is having a goal for the presentation and verifying that you have met your goal.

Your challenge

As a security leader, you need to communicate security effectively to executive stakeholders in order to obtain support for your security objectives.

  • When it comes to presenting security to executive stakeholders, many security leaders find it challenging to convey the necessary information in order to obtain support for security objectives.
  • This is attributed to various factors, such as an increase in the threat landscape, changes to industry regulations and standards, and new organizational goals that security has to align with.
  • Furthermore, with the limited time to communicate with executive stakeholders, both in frequency and duration, identifying the most important information to address can be challenging.

76% of security leaders struggle in conveying the effectiveness of a cybersecurity program.

62% find it difficult to balance the risk of too much detail and need-to-know information.

41% find it challenging to communicate effectively with a mixed technical and non-technical audience.

Source: Deloitte, 2022

Common obstacles

There is a disconnect between security leaders and executive stakeholders when it comes to the security posture of the organization:

  • Executive stakeholders are not confident that their security leaders are doing enough to mitigate security risks.
  • The issue has been amplified, with security threats constantly increasing across all industries.
  • However, security leaders don’t feel that they are in a position to make themselves heard.
  • The lack of organizational security awareness and support from cross-functional departments has made it difficult to achieve security objectives (e.g. education, investments).
  • Defining an approach to remove that disconnect with executive stakeholders is of utmost importance for security leaders, in order to improve their organization’s security posture.

9% of boards are extremely confident in their organization’s cybersecurity risk mitigation measures.

77% of organizations have seen an increase in the number of attacks in 2021.

56% of security leaders claimed their team is not involved when leadership makes urgent security decisions.

Source: EY, 2021
The image contains a screenshot of an Info-Tech Thoughtmodel titled: Presenting Security to Executive Stakeholders.

Info-Tech’s methodology for presenting security to executive stakeholders

1. Identify communication goals

2. Collect information to support goals

3. Develop communication

4. Deliver communication

Phase steps

  1. Identify drivers for communicating to executives
  2. Define your goals for communicating to executives
  1. Identify data to collect
  2. Plan how to retrieve data
  1. Plan communication
  2. Build a compelling communication document
  1. Deliver a captivating presentation
  2. Obtain/verify goals

Phase outcomes

A defined list of drivers and goals to help you develop your security presentations

A list of data sources to include in your communication

A completed communication template

A solidified understanding of how to effectively communicate security to your stakeholders

Develop a structured process for communicating security to your stakeholders

Security presentations are not a one-way street
The key to a successful executive security presentation is having a goal for the presentation and verifying that you have met your goal.

Identifying your goals is the foundation of an effective presentation
Defining your drivers and goals for communicating security will enable you to better prepare and deliver your presentation, which will help you obtain your desired outcome.

Harness the power of data
Leveraging data and analytics will help you provide quantitative-based communication, which will result in a more meaningful and effective presentation.

Take your audience on a journey
Developing a storytelling approach will help engage with your audience.

Win your audience by building a rapport
Establishing credibility and trust with executive stakeholders will enable you to obtain their support for security objectives.

Tactical insight
Conduct background research on audience members (i.e. professional background) to help understand how best to communicate with them and overcome potential objections.

Tactical insight
Verifying your objectives at the end of the communication is important, as it ensures you have successfully communicated to executive stakeholders.

Project deliverables

This blueprint is accompanied by a supporting deliverable which includes five security presentation templates.

Report on Security Initiatives
Template showing how to inform executive stakeholders of security initiatives.

Report on Security Initiatives.

Security Metrics
Template showing how to inform executive stakeholders of current security metrics that would help drive future initiatives.

Security Metrics.

Security Incident Response & Recovery
Template showing how to inform executive stakeholders of security incidents, their impact, and the response plan.

Security Incident Response & Recovery

Security Funding Request
Template showing how to inform executive stakeholders of security incidents, their impact, and the response plan.

Security Funding Request

Key template:

Security and Risk Update

Template showing how to inform executive stakeholders of proactive security and risk initiatives.

Blueprint benefits

IT/InfoSec benefits

Business benefits

  • Reduce effort and time spent preparing cybersecurity presentations for executive stakeholders by having templates to use.
  • Enable security leaders to better prepare what to present and how to present it to their executive stakeholders, as well as driving the required outcomes from those presentations.
  • Establish a best practice for communicating security and IT to executive stakeholders.
  • Gain increased awareness of cybersecurity and the impact executive stakeholders can have on improving an organization’s security posture.
  • Understand how security’s alignment with the business will enable the strategic growth of the organization.
  • Gain a better understanding of how security and IT objectives are developed and justified.

Measure the value of this blueprint

Phase

Measured Value (Yearly)

Phase 1: Identify communication goals

Cost to define drivers and goals for communicating security to executives:

16 FTE hours @ $233K* =$1,940

Phase 2: Collect information to support goals

Cost to collect and synthesize necessary data to support communication goals:

16 FTE hours @ $233K = $1,940

Phase 3: Develop communication

Cost to develop communication material that will contextualize information being shown:

16 FTE hours @ $233K = $1,940

Phase 4: Deliver communication

Potential Savings:

Total estimated effort = $5,820

Our blueprint will help you save $5,820 and over 40 FTE hours

* The financial figure depicts the annual salary of a CISO in 2022

Source: Chief Information Security Officer Salary.” Salary.com, 2022

Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

DIY Toolkit

“Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful.”

Guided Implementation

“Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track.”

Workshop

“We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place.”

Consulting

“Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project.”

Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

Phase 1

Identify communication goals

Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4

1.1 Identify drivers for communicating to executives

1.2 Define your goals for communicating to executives

2.1 Identify data to collect

2.2 Plan how to retrieve data

3.1 Plan communication

3.2 Build a compelling communication document

4.1 Deliver a captivating presentation

4.2 Obtain/verify support for security goals

This phase will walk you through the following activities:

  • Understanding the different drivers for communicating security to executive stakeholders
  • Identifying different communication goals

This phase involves the following participants:

  • Security leader

1.1. Identify drivers for communicating to executive stakeholders

As a security leader, you meet with executives and stakeholders with diverse backgrounds, and you aim to showcase your organization’s security posture along with its alignment with the business’ goals.

However, with the constant changes in the security threat landscape, demands and drivers for security could change. Thus, understanding potential drivers that will influence your communication will assist you in developing and delivering an effective security presentation.

39% of organizations had cybersecurity on the agenda of their board’s quarterly meeting.

Source: EY, 2021.

Info-Tech Insight

Not all security presentations are the same. Keep your communication strategy and processes agile.

Know your drivers for security presentations

By understanding the influences for your security presentations, you will be able to better plan what to present to executive stakeholders.

  • These meetings, which are usually held once per quarter, provide you with less than one hour of presentation time.
  • Hence, it is crucial to know why you need to present security and whether these drivers are similar across the other presentations.

Understanding drivers will also help you understand how to present security to executive stakeholders.

  • These drivers will shape the structure of your presentation and help determine your approach to communicating your goals.
  • For example, financial-based presentations that are driven by budget requests might create a sense of urgency or assurance about investment in a security initiative.

Identify your communication drivers, which can stem from various initiatives and programs, including:

  • Results from internal or external audit reports.
  • Upcoming budget meetings.
  • Briefing newly elected executive stakeholders on security.

When it comes to identifying your communication drivers, you can collaborate with subject matter experts, like your corporate secretary or steering committees, to ensure the material being communicated will align with some of the organizational goals.

Examples of drivers for security presentations

Audit
Upcoming internal or external audits might require updates on the organization’s compliance

Organizational restructuring
Restructuring within an organization could require security updates

Merger & Acquisition
An M&A would trigger presentations on organization’s current and future security posture

Cyber incident
A cyberattack would require an immediate presentation on its impact and the incident response plan

Ad hoc
Provide security information requested by stakeholders

1.2. Define your goals for communicating to executives

After identifying drivers for your communication, it’s important to determine what your goals are for the presentation.

  • Communication drivers are mainly triggers for why you want to present security.
  • Communication goals are the potential outcomes you are hoping to obtain from the presentation.
  • Your communication goals would help identify what data and metrics to include in your presentation, the structure of your communication deck, and how you deliver your communication to executive stakeholders.

Identifying your communication goals could require the participation of the security team, IT leadership, and other business stakeholders.

  • As a group, brainstorm the security goals that align with your business goals for the coming year.
    • Aim to have at least two business goals that align with each security goal.
  • Identify what benefits and value the executive stakeholders will gain from the security goal being presented.
    • E.g. Increased security awareness, updates on organization's security posture.
  • Identify what the ask is for this presentation.
    • E.g. Approval for increasing budget to support security initiatives, executive support to implement internal security programs.

Info-Tech Insight

There can be different reasons to communicate security to executive stakeholders. You need to understand what you want to get out of your presentation.

Examples of security presentation goals

Educate
Educate the board on security trends and/or latest risks in the industry

Update
Provide updates on security initiatives, relevant security metrics, and compliance posture

Inform
Provide an incident response plan due to a security incident or deliver updates on current threats and risks

Investment
Request funding for security investments or financial updates on past security initiatives

Ad hoc
Provide security information requested by stakeholders

Phase 2

Collect information to support goals

Phase 1Phase 2Phase 3Phase 4

1.1 Identify drivers for communicating to executives

1.2 Define your goals for communicating to executives

2.1 Identify data to collect

2.2 Plan how to retrieve data

3.1 Plan communication

3.2 Build a compelling communication document

4.1 Deliver a captivating presentation

4.2 Obtain/verify support for security goals

This phase will walk you through the following activities:

  • Understanding what types of data to include in your security presentations
  • Defining where and how to retrieve data

This phase involves the following participants:

  • Security leader
  • Network/security analyst

2.1 Identify data to collect

After identifying drivers and goals for your communication, it’s important to include the necessary data to justify the information being communicated.

  • Leveraging data and analytics will assist in providing quantitative-based communication, which will result in a more meaningful and effective presentation.
  • The data presented will showcase the visibility of an organization’s security posture along with potential risks and figures on how to mitigate those risks.
  • Providing analysis of the quantitative data presented will also showcase further insights on the figures, allow the audience to better understand the data, and show its relevance to the communication goals.

Identifying data to collect doesn’t need to be a rigorous task; you can follow these steps to help you get started:

  • Work with your security team to identify the main type of data applicable to the communication goals.
    • E.g. Financial data would be meaningful to use when communicating a budget presentation.
  • Identify supporting data linked to the main data defined.
    • E.g. If a financial investment is made to implement a security initiative, then metrics on improvements to the security posture will be relevant.
  • Show how both the main and supporting data align with the communication goals.
    • E.g. Improvement in security posture would increase alignment with regulation standards, which would result in additional contracts being awarded and increased revenue.

Info-Tech Insight

Understand how to present your information in a way that will be meaningful to your audience, for instance by quantifying security risks in financial terms.

Examples of data to present

Educate
Number of organizations in industry impacted by data breaches during past year; top threats and risks affecting the industries

Update
Degree of compliance with standards (e.g. ISO-27001); metrics on improvement of security posture due to security initiatives

Inform
Percentage of impacted clients and disrupted business functions; downtime; security risk likelihood and financial impact

Investment
Capital and operating expenditure for investment; ROI on past and future security initiatives

Ad hoc
Number of security initiatives that went over budget; phishing test campaign results

2.2 Plan how to retrieve the data

Once the data that is going to be used for the presentation has been identified, it is important to plan how the data can be retrieved, processed, and shared.

  • Most of the data leveraged for security presentations are structured data, which are highly organized data that are often stored in a relational and easily searchable database.
    • This includes security log reports or expenditures for ongoing and future security investments.
  • Retrieving the data, however, would require collaboration and cooperation from different team members.
  • You would need to work with the security team and other appropriate stakeholders to identify where the data is stored and who the data owner is.

Once the data source and owner has been identified, you need to plan how the data would be processed and leveraged for your presentation

  • This could include using queries to retrieve the relevant information needed (e.g. SQL, Microsoft Excel).
  • Verify the accuracy and relevance of the data with other stakeholders to ensure it is the most appropriate data to be presented to the executive stakeholders.

Info-Tech Insight

Using a data-driven approach to help support your objectives is key to engaging with your audience.

Plan where to retrieve the data

Identifying the relevant data sources to retrieve your data and the appropriate data owner enables efficient collaboration between departments collecting, processing, and communicating the data and graphics to the audience.

Examples of where to retrieve your data

Data Source

Data

Data Owner

Communication Goal

Audit & Compliance Reports

Percentage of controls completed to be certified with ISO 27001; Number of security threats & risks identified.

Audit Manager;

Compliance Manager;

Security Leader

Ad hoc, Educate, Inform

Identity & Access Management (IAM) Applications

Number of privileged accounts/department; Percentage of user accounts with MFA applied

Network/Security Analyst

Ad hoc, Inform, Update

Security Information & Event Management (SIEM)

Number of attacks detected and blocked before & after implementing endpoint security; Percentage of firewall rules that triggered a false positive

Network/Security Analyst

Ad hoc, Inform, Update

Vulnerability Management Applications

Percentage of critical vulnerabilities patched; Number of endpoints encrypted

Network/Security Analyst

Ad hoc, Inform, Update

Financial & Accounting Software

Capital & operating expenditure for future security investments; Return on investment (ROI) on past and current security investments

Financial and/or Accounting Manager

Ad hoc, Educate, Investments

Phase 3

Develop communication

Phase 1Phase 2Phase 3Phase 4

1.1 Identify drivers for communicating to executives

1.2 Define your goals for communicating to executives

2.1 Identify data to collect

2.2 Plan how to retrieve data

3.1 Plan communication

3.2 Build a compelling communication document

4.1 Deliver a captivating presentation

4.2 Obtain/verify support for security goals

This phase will walk you through the following activities:

  • Identifying a communication strategy for presenting security
  • Identifying security templates that are applicable to your presentation

This phase involves the following participants:

  • Security leader

3.1 Plan communication: Know who your audience is

  • When preparing your communication, it's important to understand who your target audience is and to conduct background research on them.
  • This will help develop your communication style and ensure your presentation caters to the expected audience in the room.

Examples of two profiles in a boardroom

Formal board of directors

The executive team

  • In the private sector, this will include an appointed board of shareholders and subcommittees external to the organization.
  • In the public sector, this can include councils, commissions, or the executive team itself.
  • In government, this can include mayors, ministers, and governors.
  • The board’s overall responsibility is governance.
  • This audience will include your boss and your peers internal to the organization.
  • This category is primarily involved in the day-to-day operations of the organization and is responsible for carrying out the strategic direction set by the board.
  • The executive team’s overall responsibility is operations.

3.1.1 Know what your audience cares about

  • Understanding what your executive stakeholders value will equip you with the right information to include in your presentations.
  • Ensure you conduct background research on your audience to assist you in knowing what their potential interests are.
  • Your background research could include:
    • Researching the audience’s professional background through LinkedIn.
    • Reviewing their comments from past executive meetings.
    • Researching current security trends that align with organizational goals.
  • Once the values and risks have been identified, you can document them in notes and share the notes with subject matter experts to verify if these values and risks should be shared in the coming meetings.

A board’s purpose can include the following:

  • Sustaining and expanding the organization’s purpose and ability to execute in a competitive market.
  • Determining and funding the organization’s future and direction.
  • Protecting and increasing shareholder value.
  • Protecting the company’s exposure to risks.

Examples of potential values and risks

  • Business impact
  • Financial impact
  • Security and incidents

Info-Tech Insight
Conduct background research on audience members (e.g. professional background on LinkedIn) to help understand how best to communicate to them and overcome potential objections.

Understand your audience’s concerns

  • Along with knowing what your audience values and cares about, understanding their main concerns will allow you to address those items or align them with your communication.
  • By treating your executive stakeholders as your project sponsors, you would build a level of trust and confidence with your peers as the first step to tackling their concerns.
  • These concerns can be derived from past stakeholder meetings, recent trends in the industry, or strategic business alignments.
  • After capturing their concerns, you’ll be equipped with the necessary understanding on what material to include and prioritize during your presentations.

Examples of potential concerns for each profile of executive stakeholders

Formal board of directors

The executive team

  • Business impact (What is the impact of IT in solving business challenges?)
  • Investments (How will it impact organization’s finances and efficiency?)
  • Cybersecurity and risk (What are the top cybersecurity risks, and how is IT mitigating those risks to the business?)
  • Business alignment (How do IT priorities align to the business strategy and goals?)
  • IT operational efficiency (How is IT set up for success with foundational elements of IT’s operational strategy?)
  • Innovation & transformation priorities (How is IT enabling the organization’s competitive advantage and supporting transformation efforts as a strategic business partner?)

Build your presentation to tackle their main concerns

Your presentation should be well-rounded and compelling when it addresses the board’s main concerns about security.

Checklist:

  • Research your target audience (their backgrounds, board composition, dynamics, executive team vs. external group).
  • Include value and risk language in your presentation to appeal to your audience.
  • Ensure your content focuses on one or more of the board’s main concerns with security (e.g. business impact, investments, or risk).
  • Include information about what is in it for them and the organization.
  • Research your board’s composition and skillsets to determine their level of technical knowledge and expertise. This helps craft your presentation with the right amount of technology vs. business-facing information.

Info-Tech Insight
The executive stakeholder’s main concerns will always boil down to one important outcome: providing a level of confidence to do business through IT products, services, and systems – including security.

3.1.2 Take your audience through a security journey

  • Once you have defined your intended target and their potential concerns, developing the communication through a storytelling approach will be the next step to help build a compelling presentation.
  • You need to help your executive stakeholders make sense of the information being conveyed and allow them to understand the importance of cybersecurity.
  • Taking your audience through a story will allow them to see the value of the information being presented and better resonate with its message.
  • You can derive insights for your storytelling presentation by doing the following:
    • Provide a business case scenario on the topic you are presenting.
    • Identify and communicate the business problem up front and answer the three questions (why, what, how).
    • Quantify the problems in terms of business impact (money, risk, value).

Info-Tech Insight
Developing a storytelling approach will help keep your audience engaged and allow the information to resonate with them, which will add further value to the communication.

Identify the purpose of your presentation

You should be clear about your bottom line and the intent behind your presentation. However, regardless of your bottom line, your presentation must focus on what business problems you are solving and why security can assist in solving the problem.

Examples of communication goals

To inform or educate

To reach a decision

  • In this presentation type, it is easy for IT leaders to overwhelm a board with excessive or irrelevant information.
  • Focus your content on the business problem and the solution proposed.
  • Refrain from too much detail about the technology – focus on business impact and risk mitigated. Ask for feedback if applicable.
  • In this presentation type, there is a clear ask and an action required from the board of directors.
  • Be clear about what this decision is. Once again, don’t lead with the technology solution: Start with the business problem you are solving, and only talk about technology as the solution if time permits.
  • Ensure you know who votes and how to garner their support.

Info-Tech Insight
Nobody likes surprises. Communicate early and often. The board should be pre-briefed, especially if it is a difficult subject. This also ensures you have support when you deliver a difficult message.

Gather the right information to include in your boardroom presentation

Once you understand your target audience, it’s important to tailor your presentation material to what they will care about.

Typical IT boardroom presentations include:

  • Communicating the value of ongoing business technology initiatives.
  • Requesting funds or approval for a business initiative that IT is spearheading.
  • Security incident response/Risk/DRP.
  • Developing a business program or an investment update for an ongoing program.
  • Business technology strategy highlights and impacts.
  • Digital transformation initiatives (value, ROI, risk).

Info-Tech Insight
You must always have a clear goal or objective for delivering a presentation in front of your board of directors. What is the purpose of your board presentation? Identify your objective and outcome up front and tailor your presentation’s story and contents to fit this purpose.

Info-Tech Insight
Telling a good story is not about the message you want to deliver but the one the executive stakeholders want to hear. Articulate what you want them to think and what you want them to take away, and be explicit about it in your presentation. Make your story logically flow by identifying the business problem, complication, the solution, and how to close the gap. Most importantly, communicate the business impacts the board will care about.

Structure your presentation to tell a logical story

To build a strong story for your presentation, ensure you answer these three questions:

WHY

Why is this a business issue, or why should the executive stakeholders care?

WHAT

What is the impact of solving the problem and driving value for the company?

HOW

How will we leverage our resources (technology, finances) to solve the problem?

Examples:

Scenario 1: The company has experienced a security incident.

Intent: To inform/educate the board about the security incident.

WHY

The data breach has resulted in a loss of customer confidence, negative brand impact, and a reduction in revenue of 30%.

WHAT

Financial, legal, and reputational risks identified, and mitigation strategies implemented. IT is working with the PR team on communications. Incident management playbook executed.

HOW

An analysis of vulnerabilities was conducted and steps to address are in effect. Recovery steps are 90% completed. Incident management program reviewed for future incidents.

Scenario 2: Security is recommending investments based on strategic priorities.

Intent: To reach a decision with the board – approve investment proposal.

WHY

The new security strategy outlines two key initiatives to improve an organization’s security culture and overall risk posture.

WHAT

Security proposed an investment to implement a security training & phishing test campaign, which will assist in reducing data breach risks.

HOW

Use 5% of security’s budget to implement security training and phishing test campaigns.

Time plays a key role in delivering an effective presentation

What you include in your story will often depend on how much time you have available to deliver the message.

Consider the following:

  • Presenting to executive stakeholders often means you have a short window of time to deliver your message. The average executive stakeholder presentation is 15 minutes, and this could be cut short due to other unexpected factors.
  • If your presentation is too long, you risk overwhelming or losing your audience. You must factor in the time constraints when building your board presentation.
  • Your executive stakeholders have a wealth of experience and knowledge, which means they could jump to conclusions quickly based on their own experiences. Ensure you give them plenty of background information in advance. Provide your presentation material, a brief, or any other supporting documentation before the meeting to show you are well prepared.
  • Be prepared to have deep conversations about the topic, but respect that the executive stakeholders might not be interested in hearing the tactical information. Build an elevator pitch, a one-pager, back-up slides that support your ask and the story, and be prepared to answer questions within your allotted presentation time to dive deeper.

Navigating through Q&A

Use the Q&A portion to build credibility with the board.

  • It is always better to say, “I’m not certain about the answer but will follow up,” than to provide false or inaccurate information on the spot.
  • When asked challenging or irrelevant questions, ensure you have an approach to deflect them. Questions can often be out of scope or difficult to answer in a group. Find what works for you to successfully navigate through these questions:
    • “Let’s work with the sub-committee to find you an answer.”
    • “Let’s take that offline to address in more detail.”
    • “I have some follow-up material I can provide you to discuss that further after our meeting.”
  • And ensure you follow up! Make sure to follow through on your promise to provide information or answers after the meeting. This helps build trust and credibility with the board.

Info-Tech Insight
The average board presentation is 15 minutes long. Build no more than three or four slides of content to identify the business problem, the business impacts, and the solution. Leave five minutes for questions at the end, and be prepared with back-up slides to support your answers.

Storytelling checklist

Checklist:

  • Tailor your presentation based on how much time you have.
  • Find out ahead of time how much time you have.
  • Identify if your presentation is to inform/educate or reach a decision.
  • Identify and communicate the business problem up front and answer the three questions (why, what, how).
  • Express the problem in terms of business impact (risk, value, money).
  • Prepare and send pre-meeting collateral to the members of the board and executive team.
  • Include no more than 5-6 slides for your presentation.
  • Factor in Q&A time at the end of your presentation window.
  • Articulate what you want them to think and what you want them to take away – put it right up front and remind them at the end.
  • Have an elevator speech handy – one or two sentences and a one-pager version of your story.
  • Consider how you will build your relationship with the members outside the boardroom.

3.1.3 Build a compelling communication document

Once you’ve identified your communication goals, data, and plan to present to your stakeholders, it’s important to build the compelling communication document that will attract all audiences.

A good slide design increases the likelihood that the audience will read the content carefully.

  • Bad slide structure (flow) = Audience loses focus
    • You can have great content on a slide, but if a busy audience gets confused, they’ll just close the file or lose focus. Structure encompasses horizontal and vertical logic.
  • Good visual design = Audience might read more
    • Readers will probably skim the slides first. If the slides look ugly, they will already have a negative impression. If the slides are visually appealing, they will be more inclined to read carefully. They may even use some slides to show others.
  • Good content + Good structure + Visual appeal = Good presentation
    • A presentation is like a house. Good content is the foundation of the house. Good structure keeps the house strong. Visual appeal differentiates houses.

Slide design best practices

Leverage these slide design best practices to assist you in developing eye-catching presentations.

  • Easy to read: Assume reader is tight on time. If a slide looks overwhelming, the reader will close the document.
  • Concise and clear: Fewer words = more skim-able.
  • Memorable: Use graphics and visuals or pithy quotes whenever you can do so appropriately.
  • Horizontal logic: Good horizontal logic will have slide titles that cascade into a story with no holes or gaps.
  • Vertical logic: People usually read from left to right, top to bottom, or in a Z pattern. Make sure your slide has an intuitive flow of content.
  • Aesthetics: People like looking at visually appealing slides, but make sure your attempts to create visual appeal do not detract from the content.

Your presentation must have a logical flow

Horizontal logic

Vertical logic

  • Horizontal logic should tell a story.
  • When slide titles are read in a cascading manner, they will tell a logical and smooth story.
  • Title & tagline = thesis (best insight).
  • Vertical logic should be intuitive.
  • Each step must support the title.
  • The content you intend to include within each slide is directly applicable to the slide title.
  • One main point per slide.

Vertical logic should be intuitive

The image contains a screenshot example of a bad design layout for a slide. The image contains a screenshot example of a good design layout for a slide.

The audience is unsure where to look and in what order.

The audience knows to read the heading first. Then look within the pie chart. Then look within the white boxes to the right.

Horizontal and vertical logic checklists

Horizontal logic

Vertical logic

  • List your slide titles in order and read through them.
  • Good horizontal logic should feel like a story. Incomplete horizontal logic will make you pause or frown.
  • After a self-test, get someone else to do the same exercise with you observing them.
  • Note at which points they pause or frown. Discuss how those points can be improved.
  • Now consider each slide title proposed and the content within it.
  • Identify if there is a disconnect in title vs. content.
  • If there is a disconnect, consider changing the title of the slide to appropriately reflect the content within it, or consider changing the content if the slide title is an intended path in the story.

Make it easy to read

The image contains a screenshot that demonstrates an uneasy to read slide. The image contains a screenshot that demonstrates an easy to read slide.
  • Unnecessary coloring makes it hard on the eyes
  • Margins for title at top is too small
  • Content is not skim-able (best to break up the slide)

Increase skim-ability:

  • Emphasize the subheadings
  • Bold important words

Make it easier on the eyes:

  • Declutter and add sections
  • Have more white space

Be concise and clear

  1. Write your thoughts down
    • This gets your content documented.
    • Don’t worry about clarity or concision yet.
  2. Edit for clarity
    • Make sure the key message is very clear.
    • Find your thesis statement.
  3. Edit for concision
    • Remove unnecessary words.
    • Use the active voice, not passive voice (see below for examples).

Passive voice

Active voice

“There are three things to look out for” (8 words)

“Network security was compromised by hackers” (6 words)

“Look for these three things” (5 words)

“Hackers compromised network security” (4 words)

Be memorable

The image contains a screenshot of an example that demonstrates a bad example of how to be memorable. The image contains a screenshot of an example that demonstrates a good example of how to be memorable.

Easy to read, but hard to remember the stats.

The visuals make it easier to see the size of the problem and make it much more memorable.

Remember to:

  • Have some kind of visual (e.g. graphs, icons, tables).
  • Divide the content into sections.
  • Have a bit of color on the page.

Aesthetics

The image contains a screenshot of an example of bad aesthetics. The image contains a screenshot of an example of good aesthetics.

This draft slide is just content from the outline document on a slide with no design applied yet.

  • Have some kind of visual (e.g. graphs, icons, tables) as long as it’s appropriate.
  • Divide the content into sections.
  • Have a bit of color on the page.
  • Bold or italicize important text.

Why use visuals?

How graphics affect us

Cognitively

  • Engage our imagination
  • Stimulate the brain
  • Heighten creative thinking
  • Enhance or affect emotions

Emotionally

  • Enhance comprehension
  • Increase recollection
  • Elevate communication
  • Improve retention

Visual clues

  • Help decode text
  • Attract attention
  • Increase memory

Persuasion

  • 43% more effective than text alone
Source: Management Information Systems Research Center

Presentation format

Often stakeholders prefer to receive content in a specific format. Make sure you know what you require so that you are not scrambling at the last minute.

  • Is there a standard presentation template?
  • Is a hard-copy handout required?
  • Is there a deadline for draft submission?
  • Is there a deadline for final submission?
  • Will the presentation be circulated ahead of time?
  • Do you know what technology you will be using?
  • Have you done a dry run in the meeting room?
  • Do you know the meeting organizer?

Checklist to build compelling visuals in your presentation

Leverage this checklist to ensure you are creating the perfect visuals and graphs for your presentation.

Checklist:

  • Do the visuals grab the audience’s attention?
  • Will the visuals mislead the audience/confuse them?
  • Do the visuals facilitate data comparison or highlight trends and differences in a more effective manner than words?
  • Do the visuals present information simply, cleanly, and accurately?
  • Do the visuals display the information/data in a concentrated way?
  • Do the visuals illustrate messages and themes from the accompanying text?

3.2 Security communication templates

Once you have identified your communication goals and plans for building your communication document, you can start building your presentation deck.

These presentation templates highlight different security topics depending on your communication drivers, goals, and available data.

Info-Tech has created five security templates to assist you in building a compelling presentation.

These templates provide support for presentations on the following five topics:

  • Security Initiatives
  • Security & Risk Update
  • Security Metrics
  • Security Incident Response & Recovery
  • Security Funding Request

Each template provides instructions on how to use it and tips on ensuring the right information is being presented.

All the templates are customizable, which enables you to leverage the sections you need while also editing any sections to your liking.

The image contains screenshots of the Security Presentation Templates.

Download the Security Presentation Templates

Security template example

It’s important to know that not all security presentations for an organization are alike. However, these templates would provide a guideline on what the best practices are when communicating security to executive stakeholders.

Below is an example of instructions to complete the “Security Risk & Update” template. Please note that the security template will have instructions to complete each of its sections.

The image contains a screenshot of the Executive Summary slide. The image contains a screenshot of the Security Goals & Objectives slide.

The first slide following the title slide includes a brief executive summary on what would be discussed in the presentation. This includes the main security threats that would be addressed and the associated risk mitigation strategies.

This slide depicts a holistic overview of the organization’s security posture in different areas along with the main business goals that security is aligning with. Ensure visualizations you include align with the goals highlighted.

Security template example (continued)

The image contains a screenshot example of the Top Threats & Risks. The image contains a screenshot example of the Top Threats & Risks.

This slide displays any top threats and risks an organization is facing. Each threat consists of 2-3 risks and is prioritized based on the negative impact it could have on the organization (i.e. red bar = high priority; green bar = low priority). Include risks that have been addressed in the past quarter, and showcase any prioritization changes to those risks.

This slide follows the “Top Threats & Risks” slide and focuses on the risks that had medium or high priority. You will need to work with subject matter experts to identify risk figures (likelihood, financial impact) that will enable you to quantify the risks (Likelihood x Financial Impact). Develop a threshold for each of the three columns to identify which risks require further prioritization, and apply color coding to group the risks.

Security template example (continued)

The image contains a screenshot example of the slide, Risk Analysis. The image contains a screenshot example of the slide, Risk Mitigation Strategies & Roadmap.

This slide showcases further details on the top risks along with their business impact. Be sure to include recommendations for the risks and indicate whether further action is required from the executive stakeholders.

The last slide of the “Security Risk & Update” template presents a timeline of when the different initiatives to mitigate security risks would begin. It depicts what initiatives will be completed within each fiscal year and the total number of months required. As there could be many factors to a project’s timeline, ensure you communicate to your executive stakeholders any changes to the project.

Phase 4

Deliver communication

Phase 1Phase 2Phase 3Phase 4

1.1 Identify drivers for communicating to executives

1.2 Define your goals for communicating to executives

2.1 Identify data to collect

2.2 Plan how to retrieve data

3.1 Plan communication

3.2 Build a compelling communication document

4.1 Deliver a captivating presentation

4.2 Obtain/verify support for security goals

This phase will walk you through the following activities:

  • Identifying a strategy to deliver compelling presentations
  • Ensuring you follow best practices for communicating and obtaining your security goals

This phase involves the following participants:

  • Security leader

4.1 Deliver a captivating presentation

You’ve gathered all your data, you understand what your audience is expecting, and you are clear on the outcomes you require. Now, it’s time to deliver a presentation that both engages and builds confidence.

Follow these tips to assist you in developing an engaging presentation:

  • Start strong: Give your audience confidence that this will be a good investment of their time. Establish a clear direction for what’s going to be covered and what the desired outcome is.
  • Use your time wisely: Odds are, your audience is busy, and they have many other things on their minds. Be prepared to cover your content in the time allotted and leave sufficient time for discussion and questions.
  • Be flexible while presenting: Do not expect that your presentation will follow the path you have laid out. Anticipate jumping around and spending more or less time than you had planned on a given slide.

Keep your audience engaged with these steps

  • Be ready with supporting data. Don’t make the mistake of not knowing your content intimately. Be prepared to answer questions on any part of it. Senior executives are experts at finding holes in your data.
  • Know your audience. Who are you presenting to? What are their specific expectations? Are there sensitive topics to be avoided? You can’t be too prepared when it comes to understanding your audience.
  • Keep it simple. Don’t assume that your audience wants to learn the details of your content. Most just want to understand the bottom line, the impact on them, and how they can help. More is not always better.
  • Focus on solving issues. Your audience members have many of their own problems and issues to worry about. If you show them how you can help make their lives easier, you’ll win them over.

Info-Tech Insight
Establishing credibility and trust with executive stakeholders is important to obtaining their support for security objectives.

Be honest and straightforward with your communication

  • Be prepared. Being properly prepared means not only that your update will deliver the value that you expect, but also that you will have confidence and the flexibility you require when you’re taken off track.
  • Don’t sugarcoat it. These are smart, driven people that you are presenting to. It is neither beneficial nor wise to try to fool them. Be open and transparent about problems and issues. Ask for help.
  • No surprises. An executive stakeholder presentation is not the time or the place for a surprise. Issues seen as unexpected or contentious should always be dealt with prior to the meeting with those most impacted.

Hone presentation skills before meeting with the executive stakeholders

Know your environment

Be professional but not boring

Connect with your audience

  • Your organization has standards for how people are expected to dress at work. Make sure that your attire meets this standard – don’t be underdressed.
  • Think about your audience – would they appreciate you starting with a joke, or do they want you to get to the point as quickly as possible?
  • State the main points of your presentation confidently. While this should be obvious, it is essential. Your audience should be able to clearly see that you believe the points you are stating.
  • Present with lots of energy, smile, and use hand gestures to support your speech.
  • Look each member of the audience in the eye at least once during your presentation. Avoid looking at the ceiling, the back wall, or the floor. Your audience should feel engaged – this is essential to keeping their attention on you.
  • Never read from your slides. If there is text on a slide, paraphrase it while maintaining eye contact.

Checklist for presentation logistics

Optimize the timing of your presentation:

  • Less is more: Long presentations are detrimental to your cause – they lead to your main points being diluted. Keep your presentation short and concise.
  • Keep information relevant: Only present information that is important to your audience. This includes the information that they are expecting to see and information that connects to the business.
  • Expect delays: Your audience will likely have questions. While it is important to answer each question fully, it will take away from the precious time given to you for your presentation. Expect that you will not get through all the information you have to present.

Script your presentation:

  • Use a script to stay on track: Script your presentation before the meeting. A script will help you present your information in a concise and structured manner.
  • Develop a second script: Create a script that is about half the length of the first script but still contains the most important points. This will help you prepare for any delays that may arise during the presentation.
  • Prepare for questions: Consider questions that may be asked and script clear and concise answers to each.
  • Practice, practice, practice: Practice your presentation until you no longer need the script in front of you.

Checklist for presentation logistics (continued)

Other considerations:

  • After the introduction of your presentation, clearly state the objective – don’t keep people guessing and consequently lose focus on your message.
  • After the presentation is over, document important information that came up. Write it down or you may forget it soon after.
  • Rather than create a long presentation deck full of detailed slides that you plan to skip over during the presentation, create a second, compact deck that contains only the slides you plan to present. Send out the longer deck after the presentation.

Checklist for delivering a captivating presentation

Leverage this checklist to ensure you are prepared to develop and deliver an engaging presentation.

Checklist:

  • Start with a story or something memorable to break the ice.
  • Go in with the end state in mind (focus on the outcome/end goal and work back from there) – What’s your call to action?
  • Content must compliment your end goal, filter out any content that doesn’t compliment the end goal.
  • Be prepared to have less time to speak. Be prepared with shorter versions of your presentation.
  • Include an appendix with supporting data, but don’t be data heavy in your presentation. Integrate the data into a story. The story should be your focus.

Checklist for delivering a captivating presentation (continued)

  • Be deliberate in what you want to show your audience.
  • Ensure you have clean slides so the audience can focus on what you’re saying.
  • Practice delivering your content multiple times alone and in front of team members or your Info-Tech counselor, who can provide feedback.
  • How will you handle being derailed? Be prepared with a way to get back on track if you are derailed.
  • Ask for feedback.
  • Record yourself presenting.

4.2 Obtain and verify support on security goals

Once you’ve delivered your captivating presentation, it’s imperative to communicate with your executive stakeholders.

  • This is your opportunity to open the floor for questions and clarify any information that was conveyed to your audience.
  • Leverage your appendix and other supporting documents to justify your goals.
  • Different approaches to obtaining and verifying your goals could include:
    • Acknowledgment from the audience that information communicated aligns with the business’s goals.
    • Approval of funding requests for security initiatives.
    • Written and verbal support for implementation of security initiatives.
    • Identifying next steps for information to communicate at the next executive stakeholder meeting.

Info-Tech Insight
Verifying your objectives at the end of the presentation is important, as it ensures you have successfully communicated to executive stakeholders.

Checklist for obtaining and verify support on security goals

Follow this checklist to assist you in obtaining and verifying your communication goals.

Checklist:

  • Be clear about follow-up and next steps if applicable.
  • Present before you present: Meet with your executive stakeholders before the meeting to review and discuss your presentation and other supporting material and ensure you have executive/CEO buy-in.
  • “Be humble, but don’t crumble” – demonstrate to the executive stakeholders that you are an expert while admitting you don’t know everything. However, don’t be afraid to provide your POV and defend it if need be. Strike the right balance to ensure the board has confidence in you while building a strong relationship.
  • Prioritize a discussion over a formal presentation. Create an environment where they feel like they are part of the solution.

Summary of Accomplishment

Problem Solved

A better understanding of security communication drivers and goals

  • Understanding the difference between communication drivers and goals
  • Identifying your drivers and goals for security presentation

A developed a plan for how and where to retrieve data for communication

  • Insights on what type of data can be leveraged to support your communication goals
  • Understanding who you can collaborate with and potential data sources to retrieve data from

A solidified communication plan with security templates to assist in better presenting to your audience

  • A guideline on how to prepare security presentations to executive stakeholders
  • A list of security templates that can be customized and used for various security presentations

A defined guideline on how to deliver a captivating presentation to achieve your desired objectives

  • Clear message on best practices for delivering security presentations to executive stakeholders
  • Understanding how to verify your communication goals have been obtained

If you would like additional support, have our analysts guide you through other phases as part of an Info-Tech workshop.

Contact your account representative for more information.

workshops@infotech.com

1-888-670-8889

Related Info-Tech Research

Build an Information Security Strategy
This blueprint will walk you through the steps of tailoring best practices to effectively manage information security.

Build a Security Metrics Program to Drive Maturity
This blueprint will assist you in identifying security metrics that can tie to your organizational goals and build those metrics to achieve your desired maturity level.

Bibliography

Bhadauriya, Amit S. “Communicating Cybersecurity Effectively to the Board.” Metricstream. Web.
Booth, Steven, et al. “The Biggest Mistakes Made When Presenting Cyber Security to Senior Leadership or the Board, and How to Fix Them.” Mandiant, May 2019. Web.
Bradford, Nate. “6 Slides Every CISO Should Use in Their Board Presentation.” Security Boulevard, 9 July 2020. Web.
Buckalew, Lauren, et al. “Get the Board on Board: Leading Cybersecurity from the Top Down.” Newsroom, 2 Dec. 2019. Web.
Burg, Dave, et al. “Cybersecurity: How Do You Rise above the Waves of a Perfect Storm?” EY US - Home, EY, 22 July 2021. Web.
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Web.
“Chief Information Security Officer Salary.” Salary.com, 2022. Web.
“CISO's Guide to Reporting to the Board - Apex Assembly.” CISO's Guide To Reporting to the Board. Web.
“Cyber Security Oversight in the Boardroom” KPMG, Jan. 2016. Web.
“Cybersecurity CEO: My 3 Tips for Presenting in the Boardroom.” Cybercrime Magazine, 31 Mar. 2020. Web.
Dacri , Bryana. Do's & Don'ts for Security Professionals Presenting to Executives. Feb. 2018. Web.
Froehlich, Andrew. “7 Cybersecurity Metrics for the Board and How to Present Them: TechTarget.” Security, TechTarget, 19 Aug. 2022. Web.
“Global Board Risk Survey.” EY. Web.
“Guidance for CISOs Presenting to the C-Suite.” IANS, June 2021. Web.
“How to Communicate Cybersecurity to the Board of Directors.” Cybersecurity Conferences & News, Seguro Group, 12 Mar. 2020. Web.
Ide, R. William, and Amanda Leech. “A Cybersecurity Guide for Directors” Dentons. Web.
Lindberg, Randy. “3 Tips for Communicating Cybersecurity to the Board.” Cybersecurity Software, Rivial Data Security, 8 Mar. 2022. Web.
McLeod, Scott, et al. “How to Present Cybersecurity to Your Board of Directors.” Cybersecurity & Compliance Simplified, Apptega Inc, 9 Aug. 2021. Web.
Mickle, Jirah. “A Recipe for Success: CISOs Share Top Tips for Successful Board Presentations.” Tenable®, 28 Nov. 2022. Web.
Middlesworth, Jeff. “Top-down: Mitigating Cybersecurity Risks Starts with the Board.” Spiceworks, 13 Sept. 2022. Web.
Mishra, Ruchika. “4 Things Every CISO Must Include in Their Board Presentation.” Security Boulevard, 17 Nov. 2020. Web.
O’Donnell-Welch, Lindsey. “CISOs, Board Members and the Search for Cybersecurity Common Ground.” Decipher, 20 Oct. 2022. Web.

Bibliography

“Overseeing Cyber Risk: The Board's Role.” PwC, Jan. 2022. Web.
Pearlson, Keri, and Nelson Novaes Neto. “7 Pressing Cybersecurity Questions Boards Need to Ask.” Harvard Business Review, 7 Mar. 2022. Web.
“Reporting Cybersecurity Risk to the Board of Directors.” Web.
“Reporting Cybersecurity to Your Board - Steps to Prepare.” Pondurance ,12 July 2022. Web.
Staynings, Richard. “Presenting Cybersecurity to the Board.” Resource Library. Web.
“The Future of Cyber Survey.” Deloitte, 29 Aug. 2022. Web.
“Top Cybersecurity Metrics to Share with Your Board.” Packetlabs, 10 May 2022. Web.
Unni, Ajay. “Reporting Cyber Security to the Board? How to Get It Right.” Cybersecurity Services Company in Australia & NZ, 10 Nov. 2022. Web.
Vogel, Douglas, et al. “Persuasion and the Role of Visual Presentation Support.” Management Information Systems Research Center, 1986.
“Welcome to the Cyber Security Toolkit for Boards.” NCSC. Web.

Research Contributors

  • Fred Donatucci, New-Indy Containerboard, VP, Information Technology
  • Christian Rasmussen, St John Ambulance, Chief Information Officer
  • Stephen Rondeau, ZimVie, SVP, Chief Information Officer

Create a Transparent and Defensible IT Budget

  • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}291|cart{/j2store}
  • member rating overall impact: 9.3/10 Overall Impact
  • member rating average dollars saved: $29,682 Average $ Saved
  • member rating average days saved: 12 Average Days Saved
  • Parent Category Name: Cost & Budget Management
  • Parent Category Link: /cost-and-budget-management
  • IT struggles to gain budget approval year after year, largely driven by a few key factors:
    • For a long time, IT has been viewed as a cost center whose efficiency needs to be increasingly optimized over time. IT’s relationship to strategy is not yet understood or established in many organizations.
    • IT is one of the biggest areas of cost for many organizations. Often, executives don’t understand or even believe that all that IT spending is necessary to advance the organization’s objectives, let alone keep it up and running.

Our Advice

Critical Insight

Internal and external obstacles beyond IT’s control make these challenges with gaining IT budget approval even harder to overcome:

  • Economic pressures can quickly drive IT’s budgetary focus from strategic back to tactical.
  • Corporate-driven categorizations of expenditure, plus disconnected approval mechanisms for capital vs. operational spend, hide key interdependencies and other aspects of IT’s financial reality.
  • Connecting the dots between IT activities and business benefits rarely forms a straight line.

Impact and Result

  • CIOs need a straightforward way to create and present an approval-ready budget.
    • Info-Tech recognizes that connecting the dots to demonstrate value is key to budgetary approval.
    • Info-Tech also recognizes that key stakeholders require different perspectives on the IT budget.
    • This blueprint provides a framework, method, and templated exemplars for creating and presenting an IT budget to stakeholders that will speed up the approval process and ensure more of it is approved.

Create a Transparent and Defensible IT Budget Research & Tools

Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

1. Create a Transparent and Defensible IT Budget Storyboard – A step-by-step guide to developing a proposed IT budget that’s sensitive to stakeholder perspectives and ready to approve.

This deck applies Info-Tech’s proven ITFM Cost Model to the IT budgeting process and offers five phases that cover the purpose of your IT budget and what it means to your stakeholders, key budgeting resources, forecasting, selecting and fine-tuning your budget message, and delivering your IT budget executive presentation for approval.

  • Create a Transparent and Defensible IT Budget Storyboard

2. IT Cost Forecasting and Budgeting Workbook – A structured Excel tool that allows you to forecast your IT budget for next fiscal year across four key stakeholder views, analyze it in the context of past expenditure, and generate high-impact visualizations.

This Excel workbook offers a step-by-step approach for mapping your historical and forecasted IT expenditure and creating visualizations you can use to populate your IT budget executive presentation.

  • IT Cost Forecasting and Budgeting Workbook

3. Sample: IT Cost Forecasting and Budgeting Workbook – A completed IT Cost Forecasting & Budgeting Workbook to review and use as an example.

This sample workbook offers a completed example of the “IT Cost Forecasting and Budgeting Workbook” that accompanies the Create a Transparent & Defensible IT Budget blueprint.

  • Sample: IT Cost Forecasting and Budgeting Workbook

4. IT Budget Executive Presentation – A PowerPoint template and full example for pulling together your proposed IT budget presentation.

This presentation template offers a recommended structure for presenting your proposed IT budget for next fiscal year to your executive stakeholders for approval. 

[infographic]

Workshop: Create a Transparent and Defensible IT Budget

Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

1 Get into budget-starting position

The Purpose

Understand your IT budget in the context of your organization and key stakeholders, as well as gather your budgeting data and review previous years’ financial performance.

Key Benefits Achieved

Understand your organization’s budget process and culture.

Understand your stakeholders’ priorities and perspectives regarding your IT budget.

Gain insight into your historical IT expenditure.

Set next fiscal year’s IT budget targets.

Activities

1.1 Review budget purpose. 

1.2 Understand stakeholders and approvers.

1.3 Gather your data.

1.4 Map and review historical financial performance.

1.5 Rationalize last year’s variances and set next year's budget targets.

Outputs

Budget process and culture assessment.

Stakeholder alignment assessment and pre-selling strategy.

Data prepared for next steps.

Mapped historical expenditure.

Next fiscal year’s budget targets.

2 Forecast project CapEx

The Purpose

Develop a forecast of next fiscal year’s proposed capital IT expenditure driven by your organization’s strategic projects.

Key Benefits Achieved

Develop project CapEx forecast according to the four different stakeholder views of Info-Tech’s ITFM Cost Model.

Ensure that no business projects that have IT implications (and their true costs) are missed.

Activities

2.1 Review the ITFM cost model

2.2 List projects.

2.3 Review project proposals and costs.

2.4 Map and tally total project CapEx.

2.5 Develop and/or confirm project-business alignment, ROI, and cost-benefit statements.

Outputs

Confirmed ITFM cost mdel.

A list of projects.

Confirmed list of project proposals and costs.

Forecasted project-based capital expenditure mapped against the four views of the ITFM Cost Model.

Projects financials in line.

3 Forecast non-project CapEx and OpEx

The Purpose

Develop a forecast of next fiscal year’s proposed “business as usual” non-project capital and operating IT expenditure.

Key Benefits Achieved

Develop non-project CapEx and non-project OpEx forecasts according to the four different stakeholder views of Info-Tech’s ITFM Cost Model.

Make “business as usual” costs fully transparent and rationalized.

Activities

3.1 Review non-project capital and costs. 

3.2 Review non-project operations and costs.

3.3 Map and tally total non-project CapEx and OpEx.

3.4 Develop and/or confirm proposed expenditure rationales.

Outputs

Confirmation of non-project capital and costs.

Confirmation of non-project operations and costs.

Forecasted non-project-based capital expenditure and operating expenditure against the four views of the ITFM Cost Model.

Proposed expenditure rationales.

4 Finalize budget and develop presentation

The Purpose

Aggregate and sanity-check your forecasts, harden your rationales, and plan/develop the content for your IT budget executive presentation.

Key Benefits Achieved

Create a finalized proposed IT budget for next fiscal year that offers different views on your budget for different stakeholders.

Select content for your IT budget executive presentation that will resonate with your stakeholders and streamline approval.

Activities

4.1 Aggregate forecast totals and sanity check.

4.2 Generate graphical outputs and select content to include in presentation.

4.3 Fine-tune rationales.

4.4 Develop presentation and write commentary.

Outputs

Final proposed IT budget for next fiscal year.

Graphic outputs selected for presentation.

Rationales for budget.

Content for IT Budget Executive Presentation.

5 Next steps and wrap-up (offsite)

The Purpose

Finalize and polish the IT budget executive presentation.

Key Benefits Achieved

An approval-ready presentation that showcases your business-aligned proposed IT budget backed up with rigorous rationales.

Activities

5.1 Complete in-progress deliverables from previous four days.

5.2 Set up review time for workshop deliverables and to discuss next steps.

Outputs

Completed IT Budget Executive Presentation.

Review scheduled.

Further reading

Create a Transparent and Defensible IT Budget

Build in approvability from the start.

EXECUTIVE BRIEF

Analyst Perspective

A budget’s approvability is about transparency and rationale, not the size of the numbers.

Jennifer Perrier.

It’s that time of year again – budgeting. Most organizations invest a lot of time and effort in a capital project selection process, tack a few percentage points onto last year’s OpEx, do a round of trimming, and call it a day. However, if you want to improve IT financial transparency and get your business stakeholders and the CFO to see the true value of IT, you need to do more than this.

Yourcrea IT budget is more than a once-a-year administrative exercise. It’s an opportunity to educate, create partnerships, eliminate nasty surprises, and build trust. The key to doing these things rests in offering a range of budget perspectives that engage and make sense to your stakeholders, as well as providing iron-clad rationales that tie directly to organizational objectives.

The work of setting and managing a budget never stops – it’s a series of interactions, conversations, and decisions that happen throughout the year. If you take this approach to budgeting, you’ll greatly enhance your chances of creating and presenting a defensible annual budget that gets approved the first time around.

Jennifer Perrier
Principal Research Director
IT Financial Management Practice
Info-Tech Research Group

Executive Summary

Your Challenge

Common Obstacles

Info-Tech’s Approach

IT struggles to gain budget approval year after year, largely driven by a few key factors:

  • For a long time, IT has been viewed as a cost center whose efficiency needs to be increasingly optimized over time. IT’s relationship to strategy is not yet understood or established in many organizations.
  • IT is one of the biggest areas of cost for many organizations. Often, executives don’t understand, or even believe, that all that IT spending is necessary to advance the organization’s objectives, let alone keep it running.

Internal and external obstacles beyond IT’s control make these challenges even harder to overcome:

  • Economic pressures can quickly drive IT’s budgetary focus from strategic back to tactical.
  • Corporate-driven categorizations of expenditure, plus disconnected approval mechanisms for capital vs. operational spend, hide key interdependencies and other aspects of IT’s financial reality.
  • Connecting the dots between IT activities and business benefits rarely forms a straight line.

CIOs need a straightforward way to create and present an approval-ready budget.

  • Info-Tech recognizes that connecting the dots to demonstrate value is key to budgetary approval.
  • Info-Tech also recognizes that key stakeholders require different perspectives on the IT budget.
  • This blueprint provides a framework, method, and templated exemplars for creating and presenting an IT budget to stakeholders. It will speed the approval process and ensure more of it is approved.

Info-Tech Insight
CIOs need a straightforward way to create and present an approval-ready IT budget that demonstrates the value IT is delivering to the business and speaks directly to different stakeholder priorities.

IT struggles to get budgets approved due to low transparency and failure to engage

Capability challenges

Administrative challenges

Operating challenges

Visibility challenges

Relationship challenges

IT is seen as a cost center, not an enabler or driver of business strategy.

IT leaders are not seen as business leaders.

Economic pressures drive knee-jerk redirection of IT’s budgetary focus from strategic initiatives back to operational tactics.

The vast majority of IT’s
real-life expenditure is in the form of operating expenses i.e. keeping the lights on.

Most business leaders don’t know how many IT resources their business units are really consuming.

Other departments in the organization see IT as a competitor for funding, not a business partner.

Lack of transparency

IT and the business aren’t speaking the same language.

IT leaders don’t have sufficient access to information about, or involvement in, business decisions and objectives.

Outmoded finance department expenditure categorizations don’t accommodate IT’s real cost categories.

IT absorbs unplanned spend because business leaders don’t realize or consider the impact of their decisions on IT.

The business doesn’t understand what IT is, what it does, or what it can offer.

IT and the business don’t have meaningful conversations about IT costs, opportunities, or investments.

Defining and demonstrating the value of IT and its investments isn’t straightforward.

IT leaders may not have the financial literacy or acumen needed to translate IT activities and needs into business terms.

CapEx and OpEx approval and tracking mechanisms are handled separately when, in reality, they’re highly interdependent.

IT activities usually have an indirect relationship with revenue, making value calculations more complicated.

Much of IT, especially infrastructure, is invisible to the business and is only noticed if it’s not working.

The relationship between IT spending and how it supports achievement of business objectives is not clear.

Reflect on the numbers…

The image contains a screenshot of five graphs. The graphs depict Cost and budget management, Cost optimization, Business value, perception of improvement, and intensity of business frustration.

To move forward, first you need to get unstuck

Today’s IT budgeting challenges have been growing for a long time. Overcoming these challenges means untangling yourself from the grip of the root causes.

Principle 1:
IT and the business are fighting diverging forces. Technology has changed monumentally, while financial management hasn’t changed much at all.

Principle 2:
Different stakeholders have different perspectives on your IT budget. Learn and acknowledge what’s important to them so that you can potentially deliver it.

Principle 3:
Connecting the dots to clearly demonstrate IT’s value to the organization is the key to budgetary approval. But those connected dots don’t always result in a straight line.

The three principles above are all about IT’s changing relationship to the business. IT leaders need a systematic and repeatable approach to budgeting that addresses these principles by:

  • Clearly illustrating the alignment between the IT budget and business objectives.
  • Showing stakeholders the overall value that IT investment will bring them.
  • Demonstrating where IT is already realizing efficiencies and economies of scale.
  • Gaining consensus on the IT budget from all parties affected by it.

“The culture of the organization will drive your success with IT financial management.”

– Dave Kish, Practice Lead, IT Financial Management Practice, Info-Tech Research Group

Info-Tech’s approach

CIOs need a straightforward way to convince approval-granting CFOs, CEOs, boards, and committees to spend money on IT to advance the organization’s strategies.

IT budget approval cycle

The image contains a screenshot of the IT budget approval cycle.

The Info-Tech difference:

This blueprint provides a framework, method, and templated exemplars for building and presenting your IT budget to different stakeholders. These will speed the approval process and ensure that a higher percentage of your proposed spend is approved.

Info-Tech’s methodology for how to create a transparent and defensible it budget

1. Lay Your Foundation

2. Get Into Budget-Starting Position

3. Develop Your Forecasts

4. Build Your Proposed Budget

5. Create and Deliver Your Budget Presentation

Phase steps

  1. Understand budget purpose
  2. Know your stakeholders
  3. Continuously pre-sell your budget
  1. Gather your data
  2. Review historical performance
  3. Set budget goals
  1. Develop alternate scenarios
  2. Develop project CapEx forecasts
  3. Develop non-project CapEx and OpEx forecasts
  1. Aggregate your forecasts
  2. Stress-test your forecasts
  3. Challenge and perfect your rationales
  1. Plan your presentation content
  2. Build your budget presentation
  3. Present, finalize, and submit your budget

Phase outcomes

An understanding of your stakeholders and what your IT budget means to them.

Information and goals for planning next fiscal year’s IT budget.

Completed forecasts for project and non-project CapEx and OpEx.

A final IT budget for proposal including scenario-based alternatives.

An IT budget presentation.

Insight summary

Overarching insight: Create a transparent and defensible IT budget

CIOs need a straightforward way to create and present an approval-ready IT budget that demonstrates the value IT is delivering to the business and speaks directly to different stakeholder priorities.

Phase 1 insight: Lay your foundation

IT needs to step back and look at it’s budget-creation process by first understanding exactly what a budget is intended to do and learning what the IT budget means to IT’s various business stakeholders.

Phase 2 Insight: Get into budget-starting position

Presenting your proposed IT budget in the context of past IT expenditure demonstrates a pattern of spend behavior that is fundamental to next year’s expenditure rationale.

Phase 3 insight: Develop your forecasts

Forecasting costs according to a range of views, including CapEx vs. OpEx and project vs. non-project, and then positioning it according to different stakeholder perspectives, is key to creating a transparent budget.

Phase 4 insight: Build your proposed budget

Fine-tuning and hardening the rationales behind every aspect of your proposed budget is one of the most important steps for facilitating the budgetary approval process and increasing the amount of your budget that is ultimately approved.

Phase 5 insight: Create and deliver your budget presentation

Selecting the right content to present to your various stakeholders at the right level of granularity ensures that they see their priorities reflected in IT’s budget, driving their interest and engagement in IT financial concerns.

Blueprint deliverables

Each step of this blueprint is accompanied by supporting deliverables to help you accomplish your goals:

IT Cost Forecasting and Budgeting Workbook

This Excel tool allows you to capture and work through all elements of your IT forecasting from the perspective of multiple key stakeholders and generates compelling visuals to choose from to populate your final executive presentation.

The image contains a screenshot of the IT Cost Forecasting and Budgeting Workbook.

Also download this completed sample:

Sample: IT Cost Forecasting and Budgeting Workbook

Key deliverable

IT Budget Executive Presentation Template

Phase 5: Create a focused presentation for your proposed IT budget that will engage your audience and facilitate approval.

The image contains a screenshot of the IT Budget Executive Presentation Template.

Blueprint benefits

IT benefits

Business benefits

  • Improve IT’s overall financial management capability.
  • Streamline the administration of annual IT budget development.
  • Legitimize the true purpose and value of IT operations and associated expenditure.
  • Create visibility on the part of both IT and the business into IT’s mandate, what needs to be in place, and what it costs to fund it.
  • Foster better relationships with business stakeholders by demonstrating IT’s business and financial competency, working in partnership with business leaders on IT investment decisions, and building mutual trust.
  • Better understand the different types of expenditure occurring in IT, including project CapEx, non-project CapEx, and non-project OpEx.
  • Gain insight into the relationship between one-time CapEx on ongoing OpEx and its ramifications.
  • See business priorities and concerns clearly reflected in IT’s budget down to the business-unit level.
  • Receive thorough return on investment calculations and cost-benefit analyses for all aspects of IT expenditure.
  • Understand the direct relationship between IT expenditure and the depth, breadth, and quality of IT service delivery to the business.

Measure the value of this blueprint

Ease budgetary approval and improve its accuracy.

Near-term goals

  • Percentage of budget approved: Target 95%
  • Percentage of IT-driven projects approved: Target 100%
  • Number of iterations/re-drafts required to proposed budget: One iteration

Long-term goal

  • Variance in budget vs. actuals: Actuals less than budget and within 2%

In Phases 1 and 2 of this blueprint, we will help you understand what your approvers are looking for and gather the right data and information.

In Phase 3, we will help you forecast your IT costs it terms of four stakeholder views so you can craft a more meaningful IT budget narrative.

In Phases 4 and 5, we will help you build a targeted presentation for your proposed IT budget.

Value you will receive:

  1. Increased forecast accuracy through using a sound cost-forecasting methodology.
  2. Improved budget accuracy by applying more thorough and transparent techniques.
  3. Increased budget transparency and completeness by soliciting input earlier and validating budgeting information.
  4. Stronger alignment between IT and enterprise goals through building a better understanding of the business values and using language they understand.
  5. A more compelling budget presentation by offering targeted, engaging, and rationalized information.
  6. A faster budgeting rework process by addressing business stakeholder concerns the first time.

An analogy…

“A budget isn’t like a horse and cart – you can’t get in front of it or behind it like that. It’s more like a river…

When developing an annual budget, you have a good idea of what the OpEx will be – last year’s with an annual bump. You know what that boat is like and if the river can handle it.

But sometimes you want to float bigger boats, like capital projects. But these boats don’t start at the same place at the same time. Some are full of holes. And does your river even have the capacity to handle a boat of that size?

Some organizations force project charters by a certain date and only these are included in the following year’s budget. The project doesn’t start until 8-12 months later and the charter goes stale. The river just can’t float all these boats! It’s a failed model. You have to have a great governance processes and clear prioritization so that you can dynamically approve and get boats on the river throughout the year.”

– Mark Roman, Managing Partner, Executive Services,
Info-Tech Research Group and Former Higher Education CIO

Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

DIY Toolkit

“Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful.”

Guided Implementation

“Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track.”

Workshop

“We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place.”

Consulting

“Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project.”

Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

Guided Implementation

Phase 1: Lay Your Foundation

Phase 2: Get Into Budget-Starting Position

Phase 3: Develop Your Forecasts

Phase 4: Build Your Proposed Budget

Phase 5: Create and Deliver Your Budget Presentation

Call #1: Discuss the IT budget, processes, and stakeholders in the context of your unique organization.

Call #2: Review data requirements for transparent budgeting.

Call #3: Set budget goals and process improvement metrics.

Call #4: Review project CapEx forecasts.

Call #5: Review non-project CapEx and OpEx forecasts.

Call #6: Review proposed budget logic and rationales.

Call #7: Identify presentation inclusions and exclusions.

Call #8: Review final budget presentation.

A Guided Implementation (GI) is a series of calls with an Info-Tech analyst to help implement our best practices in your organization.

A typical GI is 8 to 12 calls over the course of 4 to 6 months.

Workshop Overview

Contact your account representative for more information.
workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8889

Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5

Get into budget-starting position

Forecast project CapEx

Forecast non-project CapEx and OpEx

Finalize budget and develop presentation

Next Steps and
Wrap-Up (offsite)

Activities

1.1 Review budget purpose.

1.2 Understand stakeholders and approvers.

1.3 Gather your data.

1.4 Map and review historical financial performance.

1.5 Rationalize last year’s variances.

1.5 Set next year’s budget targets.

2.1 Review the ITFM Cost Model.

2.2 List projects.

2.3 Review project proposals and costs.

2.4 Map and tally total project CapEx.

2.5 Develop and/or confirm project-business alignment, ROI, and cost-benefit statements.

3.1 Review non-project capital and costs.

3.2 Review non-project operations and costs.

3.3 Map and tally total non-project CapEx and OpEx.

3.4 Develop and/or confirm proposed expenditure rationales.

4.1 Aggregate forecast totals and sanity check.

4.2 Generate graphical outputs and select content to include in presentation.

4.3 Fine-tune rationales.

4.4 Develop presentation and write commentary.

5.1 Complete in-progress deliverables from previous four days.

5.2 Set up review time for workshop deliverables and to discuss next steps.

Deliverables

  1. Budget process and culture assessment.
  2. Stakeholder alignment assessment and pre-selling strategy.
  3. Mapped historical expenditure.
  4. Next fiscal year’s budget targets.
  1. Forecasted project-based capital expenditure mapped against the four views of the ITFM Cost Model.
  1. Forecasted non-project-based capital expenditure and operating expenditure against the four views of the ITFM Cost Model.
  1. Final proposed IT budget for next fiscal year.
  2. Plan and build content for IT Budget Executive Presentation.
  1. Completed IT Budget Executive Presentation.

Phase 1

Lay Your Foundation

Lay Your
Foundation

Get Into Budget-Starting Position

Develop Your
Forecasts

Build Your
Proposed Budget

Create and Deliver Your Presentation

1.1 Understand what your budget is
and does

1.2 Know your stakeholders

1.3 Continuously pre-sell your budget

2.1 Assemble your resources

2.2 Understand the four views of the ITFM Cost Model

2.3 Review last year’s budget vs.
actuals and five-year historical trends

2.4 Set your high-level goals

3.1 Develop assumptions and
alternative scenarios

3.2 Forecast your project CapEx

3.3 Forecast your non-project CapEx and OpEx

4.1 Aggregate your numbers

4.2 Stress test your forecasts

4.3 Challenge and perfect your
rationales

5.1 Plan your content

5.2 Build your presentation

5.3 Present to stakeholders

5.4 Make final adjustments and submit your IT budget

This phase will walk you through the following activities:

  • Seeing your budget as a living governance tool
  • Understanding the point of view of different stakeholders
  • Gaining tactics for setting future IT spend expectations

This phase involves the following participants:

  • Head of IT
  • IT Financial Lead
  • Other IT Management

Lay Your Foundation

Before starting any process, you need to understand exactly why you’re doing it.

This phase is about understanding the what, why, and who of your IT budget.

  • Understand what your budget is and does. A budget isn’t just an annual administrative event – it’s an important governance tool. Understand exactly what a budget is and your budgetary accountabilities as an IT leader.
  • Know your stakeholders. The CFO, CEO, and CXOs in your organization have their own priorities, interests, and professional mandates. Get to know what their objectives are and what IT’s budget means to them.
  • Continuously pre-sell your budget. Identifying, creating, and capitalizing on opportunities to discuss your budget well in advance of its formal presentation will get influential stakeholders and approvers on side, foster collaborations, and avoid unpleasant surprises on all fronts.

“IT finance is more than budgeting. It’s about building trust and credibility in where we’re spending money, how we’re spending money. It’s about relationships. It’s about financial responsibility, financial accountability. I rely on my entire leadership team to all understand what their spend is. We are a steward of other people’s money.”

– Rick Hopfer, CIO, Hawaii Medical Service Association

What does your budget actually do?

A budget is not just a painful administrative exercise that you go through once a year.

Most people know what a budget is, but it’s important to understand its true purpose and how it’s used in your organization before you engage in any activity or dialogue about it.

In strictly objective terms:

  • A budget is a calculated estimate of income vs. expenditure for a period in the future, often one year. Basically, it’s an educated guess about how much money will come into a business entity or unit and how much money will go out of it.
  • A balanced budget is where income and expenditure amounts are equal.
  • The goal in most organizations is for the income component of the budget to match or exceed the expenditure component.
    If it doesn’t, this results in a deficit that may lead to debt.

Simply put, a budget’s fundamental purpose is to plan and communicate how an organization will avoid deficit and debt and remain financially viable while meeting its various accountabilities and responsibilities to its internal and external stakeholders.

“CFOs are not thinking that they want to shut down IT spend. Nobody wants to do that. I always looked at things in terms of revenue streams – where the cash inflow is coming from, where it’s going to, and if I can align my cash outflows to my revenue stream. Where I always got suspicious as a CFO is if somebody can’t articulate spending in terms of a revenue stream. I think that’s how most CFOs operate.”

– Carol Carr, Technical Counselor,
Info-Tech Research Group and Former CFO

Put your IT budget in context

Your IT budget is just one of several budgets across your organization that, when combined, create an organization-wide budget. In this context, IT’s in a tough spot.

It’s a competition: The various units in your organization are competing for the biggest piece they can get of the limited projected income pie. It’s a zero-sum game. The organization’s strategic and operational priorities will determine how this projected income is divvied up.

Direct-to-revenue units win: Business units that directly generate revenue often get bigger relative percentages of the organizational budget since they’re integral to bringing in the projected income part of the budget that allows the expenditure across all business units to happen in the first place.

Indirect-to-revenue units lose: Unlike sales units, for example, IT’s relationship to projected income tends to be indirect, which means that IT must connect a lot more dots to illustrate its positive impact on projected income generation.

In financial jargon, IT really is a cost center: This indirect relationship to revenue also explains why the focus of IT budget conversations is usually on the expenditure side of the equation, meaning it doesn’t have a clear positive impact on income.

Contextual metrics like IT spend as a percentage of revenue, IT OpEx as a percentage of organizational OpEx, and IT spend per organizational employee are important baseline metrics to track around your budget, internally benchmark over time, and share, in order to illustrate exactly where IT fits into the broader organizational picture.

Budgeting isn’t a once-a-year thing

Yet, many organizations treat it like a “one and done” point of annual administration. This is a mistake that misses out on the real benefits of budgeting.

Many organizations have an annual budgeting and planning event that takes place during the back half of the fiscal year. This is where all formal documentation around planned projects and proposed spend for the upcoming year is consolidated, culminating in final presentation, adjustment, and approval. It’s basically a consolidation and ranking of organization-wide priorities at the highest level.

If things are running well, this culmination point in the overall budget development and management process is just a formality, not the beginning, middle, and end of the real work. Ideally:

  • Budgets are actually used: The whole organization uses budgets as tools to actively manage day-to-day operations and guide decision making throughout the year in alignment with priorities as opposed to something that’s put on a shelf or becomes obsolete within a few months.
  • Interdependencies are evident: No discrete area of spend focus is an island – it’s connected directly or indirectly with other areas of spend, both within IT and across the organization. For example, one server interacts with multiple business applications, IT and business processes, multiple IT staff, and even vendors or external managed service providers. Cost-related decisions about that one server – maintain, repurpose, consolidate, replace, discard – will drive other areas of spend up or down.
  • There are no surprises: While this does happen, your budget presentation isn’t a great time to bring up a new point of significant spend for the first time. The items in next year’s proposed budget should be priorities that are already known, vetted, supported, and funded.

"A well developed and presented budget should be the numeric manifestation of your IT strategy that’s well communicated and understood by your peers. When done right, budgets should merely affirm what’s already been understood and should get approved with minimal pushback.“

– Patrick Gray, TechRepublic, 2020

Understand your budgetary responsibilities as the IT leader

It’s in your job description. For some stakeholders, it’s the most important part of it.

While not a contract per se, your IT budget is an objective and transparent statement made in good faith that shows:

  • You know what it takes to keep the organization viable.
  • You understand the organization’s accountabilities and responsibilities as well as those of its leaders.
  • You’re willing and able to do your part to meet these accountabilities and responsibilities.
  • You know what your part of this equation is, as well as what parts should and must be played by others.

When it comes to your budget (and all things financial), your job is to be ethical, careful, and wise:

  1. Be honest. Business ethics matter.
  2. Be as accurate as possible. Your expenditure predictions won’t be perfect, but they need to be best-effort and defensible.
  3. Respect the other players. They have their own roles, motivations, and mandates. Accept and respect these by being a supporter of their success instead of an obstacle to them achieving it.
  4. Connect the dots to income. Always keep the demonstration of business value in your sights. Often, IT can’t draw a straight line to income, but demonstrating how IT expenditure supports and benefits future, current, and past (but still relevant) business goals and strategies, which in turn affect income, is the best course.
  5. Provide alternatives. There are only so many financial levers your organization can pull. An action on one lever will have wanted and unwanted consequences on another. Aim to put financial discussions in terms of risk-focused “what if” stories and let your business partners decide if those risks are satisfactory.

Budgeting processes tend to be similar – it’s budgeting cultures that drive differences

The basic rules of good budgeting are the same everywhere. Bad budgeting processes, however, are usually caused by cultural factors and can be changed.

What’s the same everywhere…

What’s unchangeable…

What’s changeable…

For right or wrong, most budgeting processes follow these general steps:

There are usually only three things about an organization’s budgeting process that are untouchable and can’t be changed:

Budgeting processes are rarely questioned. It never occurs to most people to challenge this system, even if it doesn’t work. Who wants to challenge the CFO? No one.

Review your organization’s budgeting culture to discover the negotiable and non-negotiable constraints. Specifically, look at these potentially-negotiable factors if they’re obstacles to IT budgeting success:

  1. Capital project vetting and selection for the next fiscal year starts three-to-six months before the end of the current fiscal year.
  2. Operational expenditure, including salaries, is looked at later with much less formality and scrutiny with an aim to cut.
  3. Each business unit does a budget presentation and makes directed amendments (usually trimming).
  4. The approved budget numbers are plugged into a standard, sub-optimal budget template provided by Finance.
  1. The legal and regulatory mandates that govern financial funding, accounting, and reporting practices. These are often specific to industries and spend types.
  2. The accounting rules your organization follows, such as GAAP, or IFRS. These too may be legally mandated for government entities and publicly-traded companies.
  3. Hard limits on the projected available income the CFO has to distribute.
  • Timeframes and deadlines
  • Order of operations
  • Areas of focus (CapEx vs. OpEx)
  • Funding sources and ownership
  • Review/approval mechanisms
  • Templates and tools

1.1 Review your budgeting process and culture

1 hour

  1. Review the following components of your budget process using the questions provided for each as a guideline.
    1. Legal and regulatory mandates. What are the external rules that govern how we do financial tracking and reporting? How do they manifest in our processes?
    2. Accounting rules used. What rules does our finance department use and why? Do these rules allow for more meaningful representations of IT spend? Are there policies or practices in place that don’t appear to be backed by any external standards?
    3. Timeframes and deadlines. Are we starting the budgeting process too late? Do we have enough time to do proper due diligence? Will expenditures approved now be out of date when we go to execute? Are there mechanisms to update spend plans mid-cycle?
    4. Order of operations. What areas of spend do we always look at first, such as CapEx? Are there any benefits to changing the order in which we do things, such as examining OpEx first?
    5. Areas of focus. Is CapEx taking up most of our budgeting cycle time? Are we spending enough time examining OpEx? Is IT getting enough time from the CFO compared to other units?
    6. Funding sources and ownership. Is IT footing most of the technology bills? Are business unit leaders fronting any technology business case pitches? Is IT appropriately included in business case development? Is there any benefit to implementing show-back or charge-back?
    7. Review/approval mechanisms. Are strategies and priorities used to rank proposed spend clear and well communicated? Are spend approvers objective in their decision making? Do different approvers apply the same standards and tools?
    8. Templates and tools. Are the ones provided by Finance, the PMO, and other groups sufficient to document what we need to document? Are they accessible and easy to use? Are they automated and integrated so we only have to enter data once?
  2. On the slide following these activity instructions, rate how effective each of the above is on a scale of 1-10 (where 10 is very effective) in supporting the budgeting process. Note specific areas of challenge and opportunity for change.

1.1 Review your budgeting process and culture

Input Output Materials Participants
  • Organizational knowledge of typical budgeting processes
  • Copies of budgeting policies, procedures, and tools
  • Rated assessment of your organization’s budget process and culture, as well as major areas of challenge and opportunity for change
  • Whiteboard/flip charts
  • Head of IT
  • IT Financial Lead
  • Other IT Management

Budget process and culture assessment

Document the outcomes of your assessment. Examples are provided below.

Budgeting area of assessment

Rating

1 = very ineffective

10 = very effective

Challenges

Opportunities for change

Legal and regulatory mandates

7

Significant regulation but compliance steps not clear or supported within departments.

Create, communicate, and train management on compliance procedures and align the financial management tools accordingly.

Accounting rules

6

IT not very familiar with them.

Learn more about them and their provisions to see if IT spend can be better represented.

Timeframes and deadlines

5

Finalize capital project plans for next fiscal four months before end of current fiscal.

Explore flexible funding models that allow changes to budget closer to project execution.

Order of operations

3

Setting CapEx before OpEx leads to paring of necessary OpEx based on CapEx commitments.

Establish OpEx first as a baseline and then top up to target budget with CapEx.

Areas of focus

6

Lack of focus on OpEx means incremental budgeting – we don’t know what’s in there.

Perform zero-based budgeting on OpEx every few years to re-rationalize this spend.

Funding sources and ownership

4

IT absorbing unplanned mid-cycle spend due to impact of unknown business actions.

Implement a show-back mechanism to change behavior or as precursor to limited charge-back.

Review/approval mechanisms

8

CFO is fair and objective with information presented but could demand more evidence.

Improve business sponsorship/fronting of new initiative business cases and IT partnership.

Templates and tools

2

Finance budget template largely irrelevant and unreflective of IT: only two relevant categories.

Adjust account buckets over a period of time, starting with SW/HW and cloud breakouts.

Receptive audiences make communication a lot easier

To successfully communicate anything, you need to be heard and understood.

The key to being heard and understood is first to hear and understand the perspective of the people with whom you’re trying to communicate – your stakeholders. This means asking some questions:

  • What context are they operating in?
  • What are their goals and responsibilities?
  • What are their pressures and stresses?
  • How do they deal with novelty and uncertainty?
  • How do they best take in information and learn?

The next step of this blueprint shows the perspectives of IT’s key stakeholders and how they’re best able to absorb and accept the important information contained in your IT budget. You will:

  • Learn a process for discovering these stakeholders’ IT budget information needs within the context of your organization’s industry, goals, culture, organizational structure, personalities, opportunities, and constraints.
  • Document key objectives and messages when communicating with these various key stakeholders.

There are certain principles, mandates, and priorities that drive your stakeholders; they’ll want to see these reflected in you, your work, and your budget.

Your IT budget means different things to different stakeholders

Info-Tech’s ITFM Cost Model lays out what matters most from various points of view.

The image contains a screenshot of Info-Tech's ITFM Cost Model.

The CFO: Understand their role

The CFO is the first person that comes to mind in dealing with budgets. They’re personally and professionally on the line if anything runs amiss with the corporate purse.

What are the CFO’s role and responsibilities?

  • Tracking cash flow and balancing income with expenditures.
  • Ensuring fiscal reporting and legal/regulatory compliance.
  • Working with the CEO to ensure financial-strategic alignment.
  • Working with business unit heads to set aligned budgets.
  • Seeing the big picture.

What’s important to the CFO?

  • Costs
  • Benefits
  • Value
  • Analysis
  • Compliance
  • Risk Management
  • Strategic alignment
  • Control
  • Efficiency
  • Effectiveness
  • Reason
  • Rationale
  • Clarity
  • Objectivity
  • Return on investment

“Often, the CFO sees IT requests as overhead rather than a need. And they hate increasing overhead.”

– Larry Clark, Executive Counselor, Info-Tech Research Group and Former CIO

The CFO carries big responsibilities focused on mitigating organizational risks. It’s not their job to be generous or flexible when so much is at stake. While the CEO appears higher on the organizational chart than the CFO, in many ways the CFO’s accountabilities and responsibilities are on par with, and in some cases greater than, those of the CEO.

The CFO: What they want from the IT budget

What they need should look familiar, so do your homework and be an open book.

Your CFO’s IT budget to-do list:

Remember to:

  • A review of the previous year financial performance. This demonstrates to the CFO your awareness, savvy, and overall competence in the financial management realm. This is also your opportunity to start laying out the real-life context within which IT has been operating. Information to show includes:
    • Budget vs. actuals, including an overview of factors that led to major variances.
    • Percentage difference in proposed budget versus previous year’s budget, and major contributing factors to those differences (i.e. unanticipated projects, changes, or events).
  • Presentation of information according to Finance’s existing categories. This makes it as easy as possible for them to plug your numbers into their system.
  • Separate views of overall workforce vs. overall vendor spending. This is a traditional view.
  • Separate views of capital expenditure (CapEx) and operating expenditure (OpEx). This also includes information on expected lifespan of proposed new capital assets to inform depreciation/amortization decisions.
  • Explanation of anticipated sources of funding. Specifically, indicate whether the funding required is a brand-new net increase or a reallocation from the existing pool.
  • Details (upon request). Have these available for every aspect of your proposed budget.
  • Avoid being flashy. Exclude proposed expenditures with a lot of bells and whistles that don’t directly tie to concrete business objectives.
  • Be a conservationist. Show how you plan to re-use or extend assets that you already have.
  • Act like a business leader. Demonstrate your understanding of near-term (12-month) realities, priorities, and goals.
  • Think like them. Present reliable and defensible calculations of benefits versus risks as well as projected ROI for major areas of new or different spending.

The CFO: Budget challenges and opportunities

Budget season is a great time to start changing the conversation and building trust.

Potential challenges

Low trust

Poor financial literacy and historical sloppiness among business unit leaders means that a CFO may come into budget conversations with skepticism. This can put them on the offensive and put you on the defensive. You have to prove yourself.

Competition

You’re not the only department the CFO is dealing with. Everyone is competing for their piece of the pie, and some business unit leaders are persistent. A good CFO will stay out of the politics and not be swayed by sweet talk, but it can be an exhausting experience for them.

Mismatched buckets

IT’s spend classes and categories probably won’t match what’s in Finance’s budget template or general ledger. Annual budgeting isn’t the best time to bring this up. Respect Finance’s categories, but plan to tackle permanent changes at a less busy time.

Potential opportunities

Build confidence

Engaging in the budgeting process is your best chance to demonstrate your knowledge about the business and your financial acumen. The more that the CFO sees that you get it and are taking it seriously, the more confidence and trust they’ll have in you.

Educate

The CFO will not know as much as you about the role technology could and should play in the organization. Introduce new language around technology focused on capabilities and benefits. This will start to shift the conversation away from costs and toward value.

Initiate alignment

An important governance objective is to change the way IT expenditure is categorized and tracked to better reveal and understand what’s really happening. This process should be done gradually over time, but definitely communicate what you want to do and why.

The CXO: Understand their role

CXOs are a diverse group who lead a range of business functions including admin, operations, HR, legal, production, sales and service, and marketing, to name a few.

What are the CXO’s role and responsibilities?

Like you, the CXO’s job is to help the organization realize its goals and objectives. How each CXO does this is specific to the domain they lead. Variations in roles and responsibilities typically revolve around:

  • Law and regulation. Some functions have compliance as a core mandate, including legal, HR, finance, and corporate risk groups.
  • Finance and efficiency. Other functions prioritize time, money, and process such as finance, sales, customer service, marketing, production, operations, and logistics units.
  • Quality. These functions prioritize consistency, reliability, relationship, and brand such as production, customer service, and marketing.

What’s important to the CXO?

  • Staffing
  • Skills
  • Reporting
  • Funding
  • Planning
  • Performance
  • Predictability
  • Customers
  • Visibility
  • Inclusion
  • Collaboration
  • Reliability
  • Information
  • Knowledge
  • Acknowledgement

Disagreement is common between business-function leaders – they have different primary focus areas, and conflict and misalignment are natural by-products of that fact. It’s also hard to make someone care as much about your priorities as you do. Focus your efforts on sharing and partnering, not converting.

The CXO: What they want from the IT budget

Focus on their unique part of the organization and show that you see them.

Your CXO’s IT budget to-do list:

Remember to:

  • A review of the previous year’s IT expenditure on the business function. This includes:
    • Budget vs. actuals (if available) for the business function, and overview of any situations or factors that led to major variances.
    • Percentage difference in proposed budget for that business function vs. the previous year’s spend, and major contributing factors to those differences, i.e. unanticipated projects, changes, or events.
    • Last year’s IT expenditure per business function employee vs. proposed IT expenditure per business function employee (if available). This is a good metric to use going forward as it’s a fair comparative internal benchmark.
  • Separate views of proposed IT workforce vs. proposed IT vendor spending for the business function. Do a specific breakout of proposed expenditure for the major applications that business unit explicitly uses.
  • Separate views of proposed IT capital expenditure (CapEx) and proposed IT operating expenditure (OpEx) for the business function. Show breakdowns for each capital project,
    as well as summaries for their core applications and portion of shared IT services.
  • Celebrate any collaborative wins from last year. You want to reinforce that working together is in both of your best interests and you’d like to keep it going.
  • Get to the apps fast. Apps are visible, concrete, and relatable – this is what the CXO cares about. Core IT infrastructure, on the other hand, is technobabble about something that’s invisible, boring, and disengaging for most CXOs.
  • Focus on the business function’s actual technology needs and consumption. Show them where they stand in relation to others. This will get their attention and serve as an opportunity to provide some education.

The CXO: Budget challenges and opportunities

Seek out your common ground and be the solution for their real problems.

Potential challenges

Different priorities

Other business unit leaders will have bigger concerns than your IT budget. They have their own budget to figure out plus other in-flight issues. The head of sales, for instance, is going to be more concerned with hitting sales goals for this fiscal year than planning for next.

Perceived irrelevance

Some business unit leaders may be completely unaware of how they use IT, how much they use, and how they could use it more or differently to improve their performance. They may have a learning curve to tackle before they can start to see your relationship as collaborative.

Bad track record

If a business unit has had friction with IT in the past or has historically been underserved, they may be hesitant to let you in, may be married to their own solutions, or perhaps do not know how to express what they need.

Potential opportunities

Start collaborating

You and other business unit leaders have a lot in common. You all share the objective of helping the organization succeed. Focus in on your shared concerns and how you can make progress on them together before digging into your unique challenges.

Practice perspective taking

Be genuinely curious about the business unit, how it works, and how they overcome obstacles. See the organization from their point of view. For now, keep your technologies completely out of the discussion – that will come later on.

Build relationships

You only need to solve one problem for a business unit to change how they think of you. Just one. Find that one thing that will make a real difference – ideally small but impactful – and work it into your budget.

The CEO: Understand their role

A CEO sets the tone for an organization, from its overall direction and priorities to its values and culture. What’s possible and what’s not is usually determined by them.

What are the CEO’s role and responsibilities?

  • Assemble an effective team of executives and advisors.
  • Establish, communicate, and exemplify the organizations core values.
  • Study the ecosystem within which the organization exists.
  • Identify and evaluate opportunities.
  • Set long-term directions, priorities, goals, and strategies.
  • Ensure ongoing organizational performance, profitability, and growth.
  • Connect the inside organization to the outside world.
  • Make the big decisions no one else can make.

What’s important to the CEO?

  • Strategy
  • Leadership
  • Vision
  • Values
  • Goals
  • Priorities
  • Performance
  • Metrics
  • Accountability
  • Stakeholders
  • Results
  • Insight
  • Growth
  • Cohesion
  • Context

Unlike the CFO and CXOs, the CEO is responsible for seeing the big picture. That means they’re operating in the realm of big problems and big ideas – they need to stay out of the weeds. IT is just one piece of that big picture, and your problems and ideas are sometimes small in comparison. Use any time you get with them wisely.

The CEO: What they want from the IT budget

The CEO wants what the CFO wants, but at a higher level and with longer-term vision.

Your CEO’s IT budget to-do list:

Remember to:

  • A review of the previous year’s financial performance. In addition to last year’s budget vs. actuals vs. proposed budget and any rationales for variances, the CEO’s interest is in seeing numbers in terms of strategic delivery. Focus on performance against last year’s goals and concrete benefits realized.
  • A review of initiatives undertaken to optimize/reduce operating costs. Note overall gains with a specific look at initiatives that had a substantial positive financial impact.
  • A specific summary of the cost landscape for new strategic or capital projects. Ideally, these projects have already been committed to at the executive level. A more fine-tuned analysis of anticipated costs and variables may be required, including high-level projects with long-term impact on operational expenditure. Categorize these expenditures as investments in innovation, growth, or keeping the lights on.
  • Details (upon request). Have these available for every aspect of your proposed budget.
  • Be brief. Hopefully, the CEO is already well versed on the strategic spend plans. Stay high-level, reserve the deep dive for your documentation, and let the CEO decide if they want to hash anything out in more detail.
  • Be strategic. If you can’t tie it to a strategic objective, don’t showcase it.
  • Use performance language. This means citing goals, metrics, and progress made against them.
  • Ensure the CFO can translate. You may not get a direct audience with the CEO – the CFO may be your proxy for that. Ensure that everything is crystal clear so that the CFO can summarize your budget on your behalf.

The CEO: Budget challenges and opportunities

Strategically address the big issues, but don’t count on their direct assistance.

Potential challenges

Lack of interest

Your CEO may just not be enthusiastic about technology. For them, IT is strictly a cost center operating on the margins. If they don’t have a strategic vision that includes technology, IT’s budget will always be about efficiency and cost control and not investment.

Deep hierarchy

The executive-level CIO role isn’t yet pervasive in every industry. There may be one or more non-IT senior management layers between IT and the office of the CEO, as well as other bureaucratic hurdles, which prohibit your direct access.

Uncertainty

What’s happening on the outside will affect what needs to be done on the inside. The CEO has to assess and respond quickly, changing priorities and plans in an instant. An indecisive CEO that’s built an inflexible organization will make it difficult to pivot as needed.

Potential opportunities

Grow competency

Sometimes, IT just needs to wait it out. The biggest shifts in technology interest often come with an outright change in the organization’s leadership. In the meantime, fine-tune your operational excellence, brush up on business skills, and draft out your best ideas on paper.

Build partnerships

Other business-function executives may need to be IT’s voice. Investment proposals may be more compelling coming from them anyway. Behind-the-scenes partnerships and high-profile champions are something you want regardless of your degree of CEO access.

Bake in resilience

Regardless of who’s at the helm, systematic investment in agile and flexible solutions that can be readily scaled, decoupled, redeployed, or decommissioned is a good strategy. Use recent crises to help make the strategic case for a more resilient posture.

What about the CIO view on the IT budget?

IT leaders tend to approach budgeting from an IT services perspective. After all, that’s how their departments are typically organized.

The CFO expense view, CXO business view, and CEO innovation view represent IT’s stakeholders. The CIO service view, however, represents you, the IT budget creator. This means that the CIO service view plays a slightly different role in developing your IT budget communications.

An IT team effort…

A logical starting point

A supporting view

Most budget drafts start with internal IT management discussion. These managers are differentially responsible for apps dev and maintenance, service desk and user support, networks and data center, security, data and analytics, and so forth.

These common organizational units and their managers tend to represent discrete IT service verticals. This means the CIO service view is a natural structural starting point for your budget-building process. Stakeholder views of your budget will be derived from this first view.

You probably don’t want to lead your budget presentation with IT’s perspective – it won’t make sense to your stakeholders. Instead, select certain impactful pieces of your view to drop in where they provide valued information and augment the IT budget story.

Things to bring forward…

Things to hold back…

  • All major application costs
  • Security/compliance costs
  • Strategic project costs
  • End-user support and enablement costs
  • Data and BI initiative costs
  • Minor applications costs
  • Day-to-day network and data center costs
  • Other infrastructure costs
  • IT management and administration costs

1.2 Assess your stakeholders

1 hour

  1. Use the “Stakeholder alignment assessment” template slide following this one to document the outcomes of this activity.
  2. As an IT management team, identify your key budget stakeholders and specifically those in an approval position.
  3. Use the information provided in this blueprint about various stakeholder responsibilities, areas of focus, and what’s typically important to them to determine each key stakeholder’s needs regarding the information contained in your IT budget. Note their stated needs, any idiosyncrasies, and IT’s current relationship status with the stakeholder (positive, neutral, or negative).
  4. Assess previous years’ IT budgets to determine how well they targeted each different stakeholder’s needs. Note any gaps or areas for future improvement.
  5. Develop a high-level list of items or elements to stop, start, or continue during your next budgeting cycle.
Input Output
  • Organizational awareness of key stakeholders and budget approvers
  • Previous years’ budgets
  • Assessment of key stakeholder needs and a list of potential changes or additions to the IT budget/budget process
Materials Participants
  • Whiteboard/flip charts
  • Stakeholder alignment assessment template (following slide)
  • Head of IT
  • IT Financial Lead
  • Other IT Management

Stakeholder alignment assessment

Document the outcomes of your assessment below. Examples are provided below.

Stakeholder

Relationship status

Understanding of needs

Budget changes/additions

CFO

Positive

Wants at least 30% of budget to be CapEx. Needs more detail concerning benefits and tracking of realization.

Do more detailed breakouts of CapEx vs. OpEx as 30% CapEx not realistic – pre-meet. Talk to Enterprise PMO about improving project benefits statement template.

VP of Sales

Negative

Only concerned with hitting sales targets. Needs to respond/act quickly based on reliable data.

Break out sales consumption of IT resources in detail focusing on CRM and SFA tool costs. Propose business intelligence enhancement project.

Director of Marketing

Neutral

Multiple manual processes – would benefit from increased automation of campaign management and social media posting.

Break out marketing consumption of IT resources and publicly share/compare to generate awareness/support for tech investment. Work together to build ROI statements

[Name/Title]

[Positive/Neutral/Negative]

[Insert text]

[Insert text]

[Name/Title]

[Positive/Neutral/Negative]

[Insert text]

[Insert text]

[Name/Title]

[Positive/Neutral/Negative]

[Insert text]

[Insert text]

[Name/Title]

[Positive/Neutral/Negative]

[Insert text]

[Insert text]

[Name/Title]

[Positive/Neutral/Negative]

[Insert text]

[Insert text]

[Name/Title]

[Positive/Neutral/Negative]

[Insert text]

[Insert text]

[Name/Title]

[Positive/Neutral/Negative]

[Insert text]

[Insert text]

[Name/Title]

[Positive/Neutral/Negative]

[Insert text]

[Insert text]

Set your IT budget pre-selling strategy

Pre-selling is all about ongoing communication with your stakeholders. This is the most game-changing thing you can do to advance a proposed IT budget’s success.

When IT works well, nobody notices. When it doesn’t, the persistent criticism about IT not delivering value will pop up, translating directly into less funding. Cut this off at the pass with an ongoing communications strategy based on facts, transparency, and perspective taking.

  1. Know your channels
  2. Identify all the communication channels you can leverage including meetings, committees, reporting cycles, and bulletins. Set up new channels if they don’t exist.

  3. Identify partners
  4. Nothing’s better than having a team of supporters when pitch day comes. Quietly get them on board early and be direct about the role each of you will play.

  5. Always be prepared
  6. Have information and materials about proposed initiatives at-the-ready. You never know when you’ll get your chance. But if your facts are still fuzzy, do more homework first.

  7. Don’t be annoying
  8. Talking about IT all the time will turn people off. Plan chats that don’t mention IT at all. Ask questions about their world and really listen. Empathy’s a powerful tool.

  9. Communicate IT initiatives at launch
  10. Describe what you will be doing and how it will benefit the business in language that makes sense to the beneficiaries of the initiative.

  11. Communicate IT successes
  12. Carry the same narrative forward through to the end and tell the whole story. Include comments from stakeholders and beneficiaries about the value they’re receiving.

Pre-selling with partners

The thing with pre-selling to partners is not to take a selling approach. Take a collaborative approach instead.

A partner is an influencer, advocate, or beneficiary of the expenditure or investment you’re proposing. Partners can:

  • Advise you on real business impacts.
  • Voice their support for your funding request.
  • Present the initial business case for funding approval themselves.
  • Agree to fund all or part of an initiative from their own budget.

When partners agree to pitch or fund an initiative, IT can lose control of it. Make sure you set specific expectations about what IT will help with or do on an ongoing basis, such as:

  • Calculating the upfront and ongoing technology maintenance/support costs of the initiative.
  • Leading the technology vetting and selection process, including negotiating with vendors, setting service-level agreements, and finalizing contracts.
  • Implementing selected technologies and training users.
  • Maintaining and managing the technology, including usage metering.
  • Making sure the bills get paid.

A collaborative approach tends to result in a higher level of commitment than a selling approach.

Put yourself in their shoes using their language. Asking “How will this affect you?” focuses on what’s in it for them.

Example:

CIO: “We’re thinking of investing in technology that marketing can use to automate posting content to social media. Is that something you could use?”

CMO: “Yes, we currently pay two employees to post on Facebook and Twitter, so if it could make that more efficient, then there would be cost savings there.”

Pre-selling with approvers

The key here is to avoid surprises and ensure the big questions are answered well in advance of decision day.

An approver is the CFO, CEO, board, council, or committee that formally commits funding support to a program or initiative. Approvers can:

  • Point out factors that could derail realization of intended benefits.
  • Know that a formal request is coming and factor it into their planning.
  • Connect your idea with others to create synergies and efficiencies.
  • Become active advocates.

When approvers cool to an idea, it’s hard to warm them up again. Gradually socializing an idea well in advance of the formal pitch gives you the chance to isolate and address those cooling factors while they’re still minor. Things you can address if you get an early start with future approvers include:

  • Identify and prepare for administrative, regulatory, or bureaucratic hurdles.
  • Incorporate approvers’ insights about organizational realities and context.
  • Further reduce the technical jargon in your language.
  • Fine tune the relevance and specificity of your business benefits statements.
  • Get a better sense of the most compelling elements to focus on.

Blindsiding approvers with a major request at a budget presentation could trigger an emotional response, not the rational and objective one you want.

Make approvers part of the solution by soliciting their advice and setting their expectations well in advance.

Example:

CIO: “The underwriting team and I think there’s a way to cut new policyholder approval turnaround from 8 to 10 days down to 3 or 4 using an online intake form. Do you see any obstacles?”

CFO: “How do the agents feel about it? They submit to underwriting differently and might not want to change. They’d all need to agree on it. Exactly how does this impact sales?”

1.3 Set your budget pre-selling strategy

1 hour

  1. Use the “Stakeholder pre-selling strategy” template slide following this instruction slide to document the outcomes of this activity.
  2. Carry forward your previously-generated stakeholder alignment assessment from Step 1.2. As a management team, discuss the following for each stakeholder:
    1. Forums and methods of contact and interaction.
    2. Frequency of interaction.
    3. Content or topics typically addressed during interactions.
  3. Discuss what the outcomes of an ideal interaction would look like with each stakeholder.
  4. List opportunities to change or improve the nature of interactions and specific actions you plan to take.
InputOutput
  • Stakeholder Alignment Assessment (in-deck template)
  • Stakeholder Pre-selling Strategy
MaterialsParticipants
  • Stakeholder Pre-selling Strategy (in-deck template)
  • Whiteboard/flip charts
  • Head of IT
  • IT Financial Lead
  • Other IT Management

Stakeholder pre-selling strategy

Document the outcomes of your discussion. Examples are provided below.

Stakeholder

Current interactions

Opportunities and actions

Forum

Frequency

Content

CFO

One-on-one meeting

Monthly

IT expenditure updates and tracking toward budgeted amount.

Increase one-on-one meeting to weekly. Alternate focus – retrospective update one week, future-looking case development the next. Invite one business unit head to future-looking sessions to discuss their IT needs.

VP of Sales

Executive meeting

Quarterly

General business update - dominates.

Set up bi-weekly one-on-one meeting – initially focus on what sales does/needs, not tech. Later, when the relationship has stabilized, bring data that shows Sales’ consumption of IT resources.

Director of Marketing

Executive meeting

Quarterly

General business update - quiet.

Set up monthly one-on-one meeting. Temporarily embed BA to better discover/understand staff processes and needs.

[Name/Title]

[Insert text]

[Insert text]

[Insert text]

[Insert text]

[Name/Title]

[Insert text]

[Insert text]

[Insert text]

[Insert text]

[Name/Title]

[Insert text]

[Insert text]

[Insert text]

[Insert text]

[Name/Title]

[Insert text]

[Insert text]

[Insert text]

[Insert text]

[Name/Title]

[Insert text]

[Insert text]

[Insert text]

[Insert text]

[Name/Title]

[Insert text]

[Insert text]

[Insert text]

[Insert text]

[Name/Title]

[Insert text]

[Insert text]

[Insert text]

[Insert text]

Phase recap: Lay your foundation

Build in the elements from the start that you need to facilitate budgetary approval.

You should now have a deeper understanding of the what, why, and who of your IT budget. These elements are foundational to streamlining the budget process, getting aligned with peers and the executive, and increasing your chances of winning budgetary approval in the end.

In this phase, you have:

  • Reviewed what your budget is and does. Your budget is an important governance and communication tool that reflects organizational priorities and objectives and IT’s understanding of them.
  • Taken a closer look at your stakeholders. The CFO, CEO, and CXOs in your organization have accountabilities of their own to meet and need IT and its budget to help them succeed.
  • Developed a strategy for continuously pre-selling your budget. Identifying opportunities and approaches for building relationships, collaborating, and talking meaningfully about IT and IT expenditure throughout the year is one of the leading things you can do to get on the same page and pave the way for budget approval.

“Many departments have mostly labor for their costs. They’re not buying a million and a half or two million dollars’ worth of software every year or fixing things that break. They don’t share IT’s operations mindset and I think they get frustrated.”

– Matt Johnson, IT Director Governance and Business Solutions, Milwaukee County

Phase 2

Get Into Budget-Starting Position

Lay Your
Foundation

Get Into Budget-Starting Position

Develop Your
Forecasts

Build Your
Proposed Budget

Create and Deliver Your Presentation

1.1 Understand what your budget is
and does

1.2 Know your stakeholders

1.3 Continuously pre-sell your budget

2.1 Assemble your resources

2.2 Understand the four views of the ITFM Cost Model

2.3 Review last year’s budget vs.
actuals and five-year historical trends

2.4 Set your high-level goals

3.1 Develop assumptions and
alternative scenarios

3.2 Forecast your project CapEx

3.3 Forecast your non-project CapEx and OpEx

4.1 Aggregate your numbers

4.2 Stress test your forecasts

4.3 Challenge and perfect your
rationales

5.1 Plan your content

5.2 Build your presentation

5.3 Present to stakeholders

5.4 Make final adjustments and submit your IT budget

This phase will walk you through the following activities:

  • Putting together your budget team and gather your data.
  • Selecting which views of the ITFM Cost Model you’ll use.
  • Mapping and analyzing IT’s historical expenditure.
  • Setting goals and metrics for the next budgetary cycle.

This phase involves the following participants:

  • Head of IT
  • IT Financial Lead
  • Other IT Management

Get into budget-starting position

Now’s the time to pull together your budgeting resources and decision-making reference points.

This phase is about clarifying your context and defining your boundaries.

  • Assemble your resources. This includes the people, data, and other information you’ll need to maximize insight into future spend requirements.
  • Understand the four views of the IT Cost Model. Firm up your understanding of the CFO expense view, CIO service view, CXO business view, and CEO innovation view and decide which ones you’ll use in your analysis and forecasting.
  • Review last year’s budget versus actuals. You need last year’s context to inform next year’s numbers as well as demonstrate any cost efficiencies you successfully executed.
  • Review five-year historical trends. This long-term context gives stakeholders and approvers important information about where IT fits into the business big picture and reminds them how you got to where you are today.
  • Set your high-level goals. You need to decide if you’re increasing, decreasing, or holding steady on your budget and whether you can realistically meet any mandates you’ve been handed on this front. Set a target as a reference point to guide your decisions and flag areas where you might need to have some tough conversations.

“A lot of the preparation is education for our IT managers so that they understand what’s in their budgets and all the moving parts. They can actually help you keep it within bounds.”

– Trisha Goya, Director, IT Governance & Administration, Hawaii Medical Service Association

Gather your budget-building team

In addition to your CFO, CXOs, and CEO, there are other people who will provide important information, insight, and skill in identifying IT budget priorities and costs.

Role

Skill set

Responsibilities

IT Finance Lead

  • Financial acumen, specifically with cost forecasting and budgeting.
  • Understanding of actual IT costs and service-based costing methods.

IT finance personnel will guide the building of cost forecasting methodologies for operating and capital costs, help manage IT cash flows, help identify cost reduction options, and work directly with the finance department to ensure they get what they need.

IT Domain Managers

  • Knowledge of services and their outputs.
  • Understanding of cost drivers for the services they manage.

They will be active participants in budgeting for their specific domains, act as a second set of eyes, assist with and manage their domain budgets, and engage with stakeholders.

Project Managers

  • Knowledge of project requirements.
  • Project budgeting.
  • Understanding of project IT-specific costs.

Project managers will assist in capital and operational forecasting and will review project budgets to ensure accuracy. They will also assist in forecasting the operational impacts of capital projects.

As the head of IT, your role is as the budgeting team lead. You understand both the business and IT strategies, and have relationships with key business partners. Your primary responsibilities are to guide and approve all budget components and act as a liaison between finance, business units, and IT.

Set expectations with your budgeting team

Be clear on your goals and ensure everyone has what they need to succeed.

Your responsibilities and accountabilities.

  • Budget team lead.
  • Strategic direction.
  • Primary liaison with business stakeholders.
  • Pre-presentation approver and final decision maker.

Goals and requirements.

  • Idea generation for investment and cost optimization.
  • Cost prioritization and rationale.
  • Skills requirements and sourcing options.
  • Risk assessment and operational impact.
  • Data format and level of granularity.

Budgeting fundamentals.

  • Review of key finance concepts – CapEx, OpEx, cashflow, income, depreciation, etc.
  • What a budget is, and its component parts.
  • How the budget will be used by IT and the organization.
  • How to calculate cost forecasts.

Their responsibilities and accountabilities.

  • Data/information collection.
  • Operational knowledge of their services, projects, and staff.
  • Cost forecast development for their respective domains/projects.
  • Review and sanity checking of their peers’ cost forecasts.

Timeframes and deadlines.

  • Budgeting stages/phases and their deliverables.
  • Internal IT deadlines.
  • External business deadlines.
  • Goals and cadence of future working sessions and meetings.

Available resources.

  • Internal and external sources of data and information.
  • Tools and templates for tracking information and performing calculations.
  • Individuals who can provide finance concept guidance and support.
  • Repositories for in-progress and final work.

2.1 Brief and mobilize your IT budgeting team

2 hours

  1. Download the IT Cost Forecasting and Budgeting Workbook
  2. Organize a meeting with your IT department management team, team leaders, and project managers.
  3. Review their general financial management accountabilities and responsibilities.
  4. Discuss the purpose and context of the budgeting exercise, different budget components, and the organization’s milestones/deadlines.
  5. Identify specific tasks and activities that each member of the team must complete in support of the budgeting exercise.
  6. Set up additional checkpoints, working sessions, or meetings that will take you through to final budget submission.
  7. Document your budget team members, responsibilities, deliverables, and due dates on the “Planning Variables” tab in the IT Cost Forecasting & Budgeting Workbook.

Download the IT Cost Forecasting and Budgeting Workbook

InputOutput
  • The organization’s budgeting process and procedures
  • Assignment of IT budgeting team responsibilities
  • A budgeting schedule
MaterialsParticipants
  • IT Cost Forecasting and Budgeting Workbook
  • Whiteboard/flip charts
  • Head of IT
  • IT Financial Lead
  • Other IT Management

Leverage the ITFM Cost Model

Each of the four views breaks down IT costs into a different array of categories so you and your stakeholders can see expenditure in a way that’s meaningful for them.

You may decide not to use all four views based on your goals, audience, and available time. However, let’s start with how you can use the first two views, the CFO expense view and the CIO service view.

The image contains a screenshot of the CFO expense view.

The CFO expense view is fairly traditional – workforce and vendor. However, Info-Tech’s approach breaks down the vendor software and hardware buckets into on-premises and cloud. Making this distinction is increasingly critical given key differences in CapEx vs. OpEx treatment.

Forecasting this view is mandatory

These two views provide information that will help you optimize IT costs. They’re designed to allow the CFO and CIO to find a common language that will allow them to collaboratively make decisions about managing IT expenditure effectively.

The image contains a screenshot of the CIO service view.

The CIO service view is your view, i.e. it’s how IT tends to organize and manage itself and is often the logical starting point for expenditure planning and analysis. Sub-categories in this view, such as security and data & BI, can also resonate strongly with business stakeholders and their priorities.

Forecasting this view is recommended

Extend your dialogue to the business

Applying the business optimization views of the ITFM Cost Model can bring a level of sophistication to your IT cost analysis and forecasting efforts.

Some views take a bit more work to map out, but they can be powerful tools for communicating the value of IT to the business. Let’s look at the last two views, the CXO business view and the CEO innovation view.

The CXO business view looks at IT expenditure business unit by business unit so that each can understand their true consumption of IT resources. This view relies on having a fair and reliable cost allocation formula, such as one based on relative headcount, so it runs the risk of inaccuracy.

Forecasting this view is recommended

The image contains a screenshot of the CXO business view.

These two views provide information that will help you optimize IT support to the business. These views also have a collaborative goal in mind, enabling IT to talk about IT spend in terms that will promote transparency and engage business stakeholders.

The CEO innovation view is one of the hardest to analyze and forecast since a single spend item may apply to innovation, growth, and keeping the lights on. However, if you have an audience with the CEO and they want IT to play a more strategic or innovative role, then this view is worth mapping.

Forecasting this view is optional

The image contains a screenshot of the CEO innovation view.

2.2 Select the ITFM Cost Model views you plan to complete based on your goals

30 minutes

The IT Cost Forecasting and Budgeting Workbook contains standalone sections for each view, as well as rows for each lowest-tier sub-category in a view, so each view can be analyzed and forecasted independently.

  1. Review Info-Tech’s ITFM Cost Model and the expenditure categories and sub-categories each view contains.
  2. Revisit your stakeholder analysis for the budgeting exercise. Plan to:
    1. Complete the CFO expense view regardless.
    2. Complete the CIO service view – consider doing this one first for forecasting purposes as it may be most familiar to you and serve as an easier entry point into the forecasting process.
    3. Complete the CXO business view – consider doing this only for select business units if you have the objective of enhancing awareness of their true consumption of IT resources or if you have (or plan to have) a show-back/chargeback mechanism.
    4. Complete the CEO innovation view only if your data allows it and there’s a compelling reason to discuss the strategic or innovative role of IT in the organization.
Input Output
  • Stakeholder analysis
  • Info-Tech’s ITFM Cost Model
  • Decision on which views in the ITFM Cost Model you’ll use for historical expenditure analysis and forecasting purposes
Materials Participants
  • Info-Tech’s ITFM Cost Model
  • Head of IT
  • IT Financial Lead
  • Other IT Management

Gather your budget-building data

Your data not only forms the content of your budget but also serves as the supporting evidence for the decisions you’ve made.

Ensure you have the following data and information available to you and your budgeting team before diving in:

Past data

  • Last fiscal year’s budget.
  • Actuals for the past five fiscal years.
  • Pre-set capital depreciation/amortization amounts to be applied to next fiscal year’s budget.

Current data

  • Current-year IT positions and salaries.
  • Active vendor contracts with payment schedules and amounts (including active multi-year agreements).
  • Cost projections for remainder of any projects that are committed or in-progress, including projected OpEx for ongoing maintenance and support.

Future data

  • Estimated market value for any IT positions to be filled next year (both backfill of current vacancies and proposed net-new positions).
  • Pricing data on proposed vendor purchases or contracts.
  • Cost estimates for any capital/strategic projects that are being proposed but not yet committed, including resulting maintenance/support OpEx.
  • Any known pending credits to be received or applied in the next fiscal year.

If you’re just getting started building a repeatable budgeting process, treat it like any other project, complete with a formal plan/ charter and a central repository for all related data, information, and in-progress and final documents.

Once you’ve identified a repeatable approach that works for you, transition the budgeting project to a regular operational process complete with policies, procedures, and tools.

Review last year’s budget vs. actuals

This is the starting point for building your high-level rationale around what you’re proposing for next fiscal year.

But first, some quick definitions:

  • Budgeted: What you planned to spend when you started the fiscal year.
  • Actual: What you ended up spending in real life by the end of the fiscal year.
  • Variance: The difference between budgeted expenditure and actual expenditure.

For last fiscal year, pinpoint the following metrics and information:

Budgeted and actual IT expenditure overall and by major cost category.

Categories will include workforce (employees/contractors) and vendors (hardware, software, contracted services) at a minimum.

Actual IT expenditure as a percentage of organizational revenue.

This is a widely-used benchmark that your CFO will expect to see.

The known and likely drivers behind budgeted vs. actual variances.

Your rationales will affect your perceived credibility. Be straightforward, avoid defending or making excuses, and just show the facts.

Ask your CFO what they consider acceptable variance thresholds for different cost categories to guide your variance analysis, such as 1% for overall IT expenditure.

Actual IT CapEx and OpEx.

CapEx is often more variable than OpEx over time. Separate them so you can see the real trends for each. Consider:

  • Sub-dividing CapEx by strategic projects and non-strategic “business as usual” spend (e.g. laptops, network maintenance gear).
  • Showing overall CapEx and OpEx as percentages of their organization-wide counterparts if that information is available.

Next, review your five-year historical expenditure trends

The longer-term pattern of IT expenditure can help you craft a narrative about the overarching story of IT.

For the previous five fiscal years, focus on the following:

Actual IT expenditure as a percentage of organizational revenue.

Again, for historical years 2-5, you can break this down into granular cost categories like workforce, software, and infrastructure like you did for last fiscal year. Avoid getting bogged down and focusing on the past – you ultimately want to redirect stakeholders to the future.

Percentage expenditure increase/decrease year to year.

You may choose to show overall IT expenditure amounts, breakdowns by CapEx and OpEx, as well as high-level cost categories.

As you go back in time, some data may not be available to you, may be unreliable or incomplete, or employ the same cost categories you’re using today. Use your judgement on the level of granularity you want to and can apply when going back two to five years in the past.

So, what’s the trend? Consider these questions:

  • Is the year-over-year trend on a steady trajectory or are there notable dips and spikes?
  • Are there any one-time capital projects that significantly inflated CapEx and overall spend in a given year or that forced maintenance-and support-oriented OpEx commitments in subsequent years?
  • Does there seem to be an overall change in the CapEx-to-OpEx ratio due to factors like increased use of cloud services, outsourcing, or contract-based staff?

Take a close look at financial data showcasing the cost-control measures you’ve taken

Your CFO will look for evidence that you’re gaining efficiencies by controlling costs, which is often a prerequisite for them approving any new funding requests.

Your objective here is threefold:

  1. Demonstrate IT’s track record of fiscal responsibility and responsiveness to business priorities.
  2. Acknowledge and celebrate your IT-as-cost-center efficiency gains to clear the way for more strategic discussions.
  3. Identify areas where you can potentially source and reallocate recouped funds to bolster other initiatives or business cases for net-new spend.

This step is about establishing credibility, demonstrating IT value, building trust, and showing the CFO you’re on their team.

Do the following:

  • List any specific cost-control initiatives and their initial objectives and targets.
  • Identify any changes made to those targets and your approaches due to changing conditions, with rationales for the decisions made. For example:
    • Mid-year, the business decided to allow approximately half the workforce to work from home on a permanent basis.
    • As a result, remote-worker demand on the service desk remained high and actually increased in some areas. You were unable to reduce service desk staff headcount as originally planned.
    • You’re now exploring ways to streamline ticket intake and assignment to increase throughput and speed resolution.
  • Report on completed cost-control initiatives first, including targets, actuals, and related impacts. Include select feedback from business stakeholders and users about the impact of your cost-control measure on them.
  • For in-progress initiatives, report progress made to-date, benefits realized to date, and plans for continuation next fiscal year.

“Eliminate the things you don’t need. People will give you what you need when you need it if you’re being responsible with what you already have.”

– Angela Hintz, VP of PMO & Integrated Services,
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Louisiana

2.3 Review your historical IT expenditure

8 hours

  1. Download the IT Cost Forecasting and Budgeting Workbook.
  2. On Tab 1, “Historical Events & Projects,” note the cost-driving and cost-saving events that occurred last fiscal year that drove any variance between budgeted and actual expenditure. Describe the nature of their impact and current status (ongoing, resolved – temporary impact, or resolved – permanent impact).
  3. Also on Tab 1, “Historical Events & Projects”, summarize the work done on capital or strategic projects, expenditures, and status (in progress, deferred, canceled, or complete).
  4. On Tab 2, “Historical Expenditure”:
    1. Enter the budgeted and actuals data for last fiscal year in columns D-H for the views of the ITFM Cost Model you’re opted to do, i.e. CFO expense view, CIO service view, CXO business view, and CEO innovation view.
    2. Enter a brief rationale for any notable budgeted-versus-actuals variances or other interesting items in column K.
    3. Enter actuals data for the remaining past five fiscal years in columns L-O. Year-over-year comparative metrics will be calculated for you.
    4. Enter FTEs by business function in columns R-AA, rows 34-43.
      Expenditure per FTE and year-over year comparative metrics will be
      calculated for you.
  5. Using Tabs 2, “Historical Expenditure” and 3, “Historical Analysis”, review and analyze the resulting data sets and graphs to identify overall patterns, specifically notable increases or decreases in a particular category of expenditure or where rationales are repeated across categories or views (these are significant).
  6. Finally, flag any data points that help demonstrate achievement of, or progress toward, any cost-control measures you implemented.

2.3 Review your historical IT expenditure

InputOutputMaterialsParticipants
  • Budgeted data for the previous fiscal year and actuals data for the previous five fiscal years
  • Mapped budgeted for last fiscal year, mapped actuals for the past five fiscal years, and variance metrics and rationales
  • IT Cost Forecasting and Budgeting Workbook
  • Whiteboard/flip charts
  • Head of IT
  • IT Financial Lead
  • Other IT Management

Pull historical trends into a present-day context when setting your high-level goals

What’s happening to your organization and the ecosystem within which it’s operating right now? Review current business concerns, priorities, and strategies.

Knowing what happened in the past can provide good insights and give you a chance to show stakeholders your money-management track record. However, what stakeholders really care about is “now” and “next”. For them, it’s all about current business context.

Ask these questions about your current context to assess the relevance of your historical trend data:

What’s the state of
the economy and how is
it affecting your organization?

What are the
organization’s stated
strategic goals and objectives?

What has the business
explicitly communicated
about finance-related targets?

What’s the business
executive’s attitude on
budget increase requests?

Some industries are very sensitive to economic cycles, causing wild budget fluctuations year to year. This uncertainty can reduce the volume of spend you automatically carry over one year to the next, making past spend patterns less relevant to your current budgeting effort.

These can change year to year as well, and often manifest on the CapEx side in the form of strategic projects selected. Since this is so variable, using previous years’ CapEx to determine next fiscal’s CapEx isn’t always useful except in regard to multi-year, ongoing capital projects.

Do your best to honor mandates. However, if cuts are suggested that could jeopardize core service delivery, tread cautiously, and pick your battles. You may be able to halt new capital spend to generate cuts, but these projects may get approved anyway, with IT expected to make cuts to OpEx.

If the CFO and others rail against even the most necessary inflation-driven increases, you’ll need to take a conservative approach, focus on cost-saving initiatives, and plan to redirect last year’s expenditures instead of pursuing net-new spend.

Set metrics and targets for some broader budget effectiveness improvement efforts

Budget goalsetting isn’t limited to CapEx and OpEx targets. There are several effectiveness metrics to track overall improvement in your budgeting process.

Step back and think about other budget and expenditure goals you have.
Do you want to:

  • Better align the budget with organizational objectives?
  • Increase cost forecasting accuracy?
  • Increase budget transparency and completeness?
  • Improve the effectiveness of your budget presentation?
  • Reduce the amount of budget rework?
  • Increase the percentage of the budget that’s approved?
  • Reduce variance between what was budgeted and actuals?

Establish appropriate metrics and targets that will allow you to define success, track progress, and communicate achievement on these higher-level goals.

Check out some example metrics in the table below.

Budgeting metric

Improvement driver

Current value

Future target

Percentage of spend directly tied to an organizational goal.

Better alignment via increased communication and partnership with the business.

72%

90%

Number of changes to budget prior to final acceptance.

Better accuracy and transparency via use of zero-based budgeting and enhanced stakeholder views.

8

2

Percentage variance between budgeted vs. actuals.

Improved forecasting through better understanding of business plans and in-cycle show-back.

+4%

+/-2%

Percentage of budget approved after first presentation.

Improved business rationales and direct mapping of expenditure to org priorities.

76%

95%

Percentage of IT-driven project budget approved.

More rigor around benefits, ROI calculation, and quantifying value delivered.

80%

100%

Set your high-level OpEx budget targets

The high-level targets you set now don’t need to be perfect. Think of them as reference points or guardrails to sanity-check the cost forecasting exercise to come.

First things first: Zero-based or incremental for OpEx?

Set your OpEx targets

Incremental budgeting is the addition of a few percentage onto next year’s budget, assuming the previous year’s OpEx is all re-occurring. The percentage often aligns with rates of inflation.

  • Most organizations take this approach because it’s faster and easier.
  • However, incremental budgeting is less accurate. Non-recurring items are often overlooked and get included in the forecast, resulting in budget bloat. Also, redundant or wasteful items can be entirely missed, undermining any cost optimization efforts.

Zero-based budgeting involves rebuilding your budget from scratch, i.e. zero. It doesn’t assume that any of last year’s costs are recurring or consistent year to year.

  • This approach is harder because all relevant historical spend data needs to be collected and reviewed, which not only takes time but the data you need may be unlocatable.
  • Every item needs to be re-examined, re-justified, and tied to an asset, service, or project, which means it’s a far more comprehensive and accurate approach.

Pick a range of percentage change based on your business context and past spend.

  • If economic prospects are negative, start with a 0-3% increase to balance inflation with potential cuts. Don’t set concrete reduction targets at this point, to avoid tunnel vision in the forecasting exercise.
  • If economic prospects are positive, target 3-5% increases for stable scenarios and 6-10% increases for growth scenarios.
  • If CapEx from previous-year projects is switching to steady-state OpEx, then account for these bumps in OpEx.
  • If the benefits from any previous-year efficiency measures will be realized next fiscal year, then account for these as OpEx reductions.

If cost-cutting or optimization is a priority, then a zero-based approach is the right decision. If doing this every year is too onerous, plan to do it for your OpEx at least every few years to examine what’s actually in there, clean house, and re-set.

Set your high-level CapEx budget targets

A lot of IT CapEx is conceived in business projects, so your proposed expenditure here may not be up to you. Exercise as much influence as you can.

First things first: Is it project CapEx, or “business as usual” CapEx?

Project CapEx is tied to one-time strategic projects requiring investment in new assets.

  • This CapEx will probably be variable year to year, going up or down depending on the organization’s circumstances or goals.
  • This area of spend is driven largely by the business and not IT. Plan to set project CapEx targets in close partnership with the business and function as a steward of these funds instead of as an owner.

User-driven “business as usual” CapEx manifests via changes (often increases) in organizational headcount due to growth.

  • Costs here focus on end-user hardware like desktops, laptops, and peripherals.
  • Any new capital software acquisitions you have planned will also be affected in terms of number of licenses required.
  • Get reliable estimates of department-by-department hiring plans for next fiscal year to better account for these in your budget.

Network/data center-driven “business-as-usual” CapEx is about core infrastructure maintenance.

  • Costs here focus on the purchase of network and data center hardware and other equipment to maintain existing infrastructure services and performance.
  • Increased outsourcing often drives down this area of “business as usual” CapEx by reducing the purchase of new on-premises solutions and eliminating network and data center maintenance requirements.

Unanticipated hiring and the need to buy end-user hardware is cited as a top cause of budget grief by IT leaders – get ahead of this. Project CapEx, however, is usually determined via business-based capital project approval mechanisms well in advance. And don’t forget to factor in pre-established capital asset depreciation amounts generated by all the above!

2.4 Set your high-level IT budget targets and metrics

8 hours

  1. Download the IT Cost Forecasting and Budgeting Workbook to document the outcomes of this activity.
  2. Review the context in which your organization is currently operating and expects to operate in the next fiscal year. Specifically, look at:
    1. The state of the economy.
    2. Stated goals, objectives, and targets.
    3. The executive’s point of view on budget increase requests.
    Document your factors, assessment, rationale, and considerations in the “Business Context Assessment” table on the “Planning Variables” tab in the IT Cost Forecasting and Budgeting Workbook.
  3. Based on the business context, anticipated flips of former CapEx to OpEx, and realization of previous years’ efficiency measures, set a general non-project OpEx target as a percentage increase or decrease for next fiscal year to serve as a guideline in the cost forecasting guideline. Document this in the “Budget Targets & Metrics” table on the “Planning Variables” tab in the IT Cost Forecasting and Budgeting Workbook. sed on known capital projects, changes in headcount, typical “business as usual” equipment expenditure, and pre-established capital asset depreciation amounts, set general project CapEx and non-project CapEx targets. Document these in the “Budget Targets & Metrics” table on the “Planning Variables” tab in the IT Cost Forecasting and Budgeting Workbook.
  4. Finally, set your overarching IT budget process success metrics. Also document these in the “Budget Targets & Metrics” table on the “Planning Variables” tab in the IT Cost Forecasting and Budgeting Workbook.

Download the IT Cost Forecasting and Budgeting Workbook

2.4 Set your high-level IT budget targets and metrics

InputOutputMaterialsParticipants
  • Knowledge of current business context and probable context next fiscal year
  • Analysis of historical IT expenditure patterns
  • High-level project CapEx and non-project CapEx and OpEx targets for the next fiscal year
  • IT budget process success metrics
  • IT Cost Forecasting and Budgeting Workbook
  • Whiteboard/flip charts
  • Head of IT
  • IT Financial Lead
  • Other IT Management

Phase recap: Get into budget-starting position

Now you’re ready to do the deep dive into forecasting your IT budget for next year.

In this phase, you clarified your business context and defined your budgetary goals, including:

  • Assembling your resources. You’ve built and organized your IT budgeting team, as well as gathered the data and information you’ll need to do your historical expenditure analysis and future forecasting
  • Understanding the four views of the IT Cost Model. You’ve become familiar with the four views of the model and have selected which ones you’ll map for historical analysis and forecasting purposes.
  • Reviewing last year’s budget versus actuals and five-year historical trends. You now have the critical rationale-building context to inform next year’s numbers and demonstrate any cost efficiencies you’ve successfully executed.
  • Setting your high-level goals. You’ve established high-level targets for project and non-project CapEx and OpEx, as well as set some IT budget process improvement goals.

“We only have one dollar but five things. Help us understand how to spend that dollar.”

– Trisha Goya, Director, IT Governance & Administration, Hawaii Medical Service Association

Phase 3

Develop Your Forecasts

Lay Your
Foundation

Get Into Budget-Starting Position

Develop Your
Forecasts

Build Your
Proposed Budget

Create and Deliver Your Presentation

1.1 Understand what your budget is
and does

1.2 Know your stakeholders

1.3 Continuously pre-sell your budget

2.1 Assemble your resources

2.2 Understand the four views of the ITFM Cost Model

2.3 Review last year’s budget vs.
actuals and five-year historical trends

2.4 Set your high-level goals

3.1 Develop assumptions and
alternative scenarios

3.2 Forecast your project CapEx

3.3 Forecast your non-project CapEx and OpEx

4.1 Aggregate your numbers

4.2 Stress test your forecasts

4.3 Challenge and perfect your
rationales

5.1 Plan your content

5.2 Build your presentation

5.3 Present to stakeholders

5.4 Make final adjustments and submit your IT budget

This phase will walk you through the following activities:

  • Documenting the assumptions behind your proposed budget and develop alternative scenarios.
  • Forecasting your project CapEx.
  • Forecasting your non-project CapEx and OpEx.

This phase involves the following participants:

  • Head of IT
  • IT Financial Lead
  • Other IT Management

Develop your forecasts

Start making some decisions.

This phase focuses on putting real numbers on paper based on the research and data you’ve collected. Here, you will:

  • Develop assumptions and alternative scenarios. The assumptions you make are the logical foundation for your decisions, and your primary and alternative scenarios focus your thinking and demonstrate that you’ve thoroughly examined your organization’s current and future context.
  • Forecast your project CapEx costs. These costs are comprised of all the project-related capital expenditures for strategic or capital projects, including in-house labor.
  • Forecast your non-project CapEx and OpEx costs. These costs are the ongoing “business as usual” expenditures incurred via the day-to-day operations of IT and delivery of IT services.

“Our April forecast is what really sets the bar for what our increase is going to be next fiscal year. We realized that we couldn’t change it later, so we needed to do more upfront to get that forecast right.

If we know that IT projects have been delayed, if we know we pulled some things forward, if we know that a project isn’t starting until next year, let’s be really clear on those things so that we’re starting from a better forecast because that’s the basis of deciding two percent, three percent, whatever it’s going to be.”

– Kristen Thurber, IT Director, Office of the CIO, Donaldson Company

When pinning down assumptions, start with negotiable and non-negotiable constraints

Assumptions are things you hold to be true. They may not actually be true, but they are your logical foundation and must be shared with stakeholders so they can follow your thinking.

Start with understanding your constraints. These are either negotiable (adjustable) or non-negotiable (non-adjustable). However, what is non-negotiable for IT may be negotiable for the organization as a whole, such as its strategic objectives. Consider each of the constraints below, determine how it relates to IT expenditure options, and decide if it’s ultimately negotiable or non-negotiable.

Organizational

Legal and Regulatory

IT/Other

Example:
  • Strategic goals and priorities
  • Financial and market performance
  • Governance style and methods
  • Organizational policies
  • Organizational culture
  • Regulatory compliance and reporting
  • Data residency and privacy laws
  • Vendor contract terms and conditions
  • Health and safety
  • Compensation and collective bargaining
  • IT funding and fund allocation flexibility
  • Staff/skills availability and capacity
  • Business continuity and IT performance requirements
  • Time and timeframes
You’re in year one of a three-year vendor contract. All contracts are negotiable, but this one isn’t for two years. This contact should be considered a non-negotiable for current budget-planning purposes.

Identifying your negotiable and non-negotiable constraints is about knowing what levers you can pull. Government entities have more non-negotiable constraints than private companies, which means IT and the organization as a whole have fewer budgetary levers to pull and a lot less flexibility.

An un-pullable lever and a pullable lever (and how much you can pull it) have one important thing in common – they are all fundamental assumptions that influence your decisions.

Brainstorm your assumptions even further

The tricky thing about assumptions is that they’re taken for granted – you don’t always realize you’ve made them. Consider these common assumptions and test them for validity.

My current employees will still be here 18 months from now.

My current vendors aren’t going to discontinue the products we have.

My organization’s executive team will be the same 18 months from now. My current key vendors will be around for years to come.

My organization’s departments, divisions, and general structure will be the same 18 months from now.

IT has to be an innovation leader.

We won’t be involved in any merger/acquisition activity next fiscal year.

IT has always played the same role here and that won’t change.

There won’t be a major natural disaster that takes us offline for days or even weeks.

We must move everything we can to the cloud.

We won’t be launching any new products or services next fiscal year.

Most of our IT expenditure has to be CapEx, as usual.

You won’t put some of these assumptions into your final budget presentation. It’s simply worthwhile knowing what they are so you can challenge them when forecasting.

Based on your assumptions, define the primary scenario that will frame your budget

Your primary scenario is the one you believe is most likely to happen and upon which you’ll build your IT cost forecasts.

Now it’s time to outline your primary scenario.

  • A scenario is created by identifying the variable factors embedded in your assumptions and manipulating them across the range of possibilities. This manipulation of variables will result in different scenarios, some more likely or feasible than others.
  • Your primary scenario is the one you believe is the most feasible and/or likely to happen (i.e. most probable). This is based on:
    • Your understanding of past events and patterns.
    • Your understanding of your organization’s current context.
    • Your understanding of IT’s current context.
    • Your understanding of the organization’s objectives.
    • Your assessment of negotiable and non-negotiable constraints and other assumptions for both IT and the organization.

A note on probability…

  • A non-negotiable constraint doesn’t have any variables to manipulate. It’s a 100% probability that must be rigidly accommodated and protected in your scenario. An example is a long-standing industry regulation that shows no signs of being updated or altered and must be complied with in its current state.
  • A negotiable constraint has many more variables in play. Your goal is to identify the different potential values of the variables and determine the degree of probability that one value is more likely to be true or feasible than another. An example is that you’re directed to cut costs, but the amount could be as little as 3% or as much as 20%.
  • And then there are the unknowns. These are circumstances, events, or initiatives that inevitably happen, but you can’t predict when, what, or how much. This is what contingency planning and insurance are for. Examples include a natural disaster, a pandemic, a supply chain crisis, or the CEO simply changing their mind. Its safe to assume something is going to happen, so if you’re able to establish a contingency fund or mechanisms that let you respond, then do it.

What could or will be your organization’s new current state at the end of next fiscal year?

Next, explore alternative scenarios, even those that may seem a bit outrageous

Offering alternatives demonstrates that you weighed all the pertinent factors and that you’ve thought broadly about the organization’s future and how best to support it.

Primary scenario approval can be helped by putting that scenario alongside alternatives that are less attractive due to their cost, priority, or feasibility. Alternative scenarios are created by manipulating or eliminating your negotiable constraints or treating specific unknowns as knowns. Here are some common alternative scenarios.

The high-cost scenario: Assumes very positive economic prospects. Characterized by more of everything – people and skills, new or more sophisticated technologies, projects, growth, and innovation. Remember to consider the long-term impact on OpEx that higher capital spend may bring in subsequent years.

Target 10-20% more expenditure than your primary scenario

The low-cost scenario: Assumes negative economic prospects or cost-control objectives. Characterized by less of everything, specifically capital project investment, other CapEx, and OpEx. Must assume that business service-level expectations will be down-graded and other sacrifices will be made.

Target 5-15% less expenditure than your primary scenario

The dark horse scenario: This is a more radical proposition that challenges the status quo. For example, what would the budget look like if all data specialists in the organization were centralized under IT? What if IT ran the corporate PMO? What if the entire IT function was 100% outsourced?

No specific target

Case Study

INDUSTRY: Manufacturing

SOURCE: Anonymous

A manufacturing IT Director gets budgetary approval by showing what the business would have to sacrifice to get the cheap option.

Challenge

Solution

Results

A manufacturing business had been cutting costs endlessly across the organization, but specifically in IT.

IT was down to the bone. The IT Director had already been doing zero-based budgeting to rationalize all expenditure, stretching asset lifecycles as long as possible, and letting maintenance work slide.

There were no obvious options left to reduce costs based on what the business wanted to do.

The IT Director got creative. He put together three complete budgets:

  1. The budget he wanted.
  2. A budget where everything was entirely outsourced and there would be zero in-house IT staff.
  3. A budget that was not as extreme as the second one, but still tilted toward outsourcing.

In the budget presentation, he led with the “super cheap” budget where IT was 100% outsourced.

He proceeded to review the things they wouldn’t have under the extreme outsourced scenario, including the losses in service levels that would be necessary to make it happen.

The executive was shocked by what the IT Director showed them.

The executive immediately approved the IT Director’s preferred budget. He was able to defend the best budget for the business by showing them what they stood to lose.

3.1 Document your assumptions and alternative scenarios

2 hours

  1. Download the IT Cost Forecasting and Budgeting Workbook and document the outcomes of this activity on Tab 9, “Alternative Scenarios.”
  2. As a management team, identify and discuss your non-negotiable and negotiable constraints. Document these in rows 4 and 5 respectively in the Workbook.
  3. Brainstorm, list, and challenge any other assumptions being made by IT or the organization’s executive in terms of what can and cannot be done.
  4. Identify the most likely or feasible scenario (primary) and associated assumptions. You will base your initial forecasting on this scenario.
  5. Identify alternative scenarios. Document each scenario’s name, description, and key assumptions, and major opportunities in columns B-D on Tab 9, “Alternative Scenarios.” You will do any calculations for these scenarios after you have completed the forecast for your primary scenario.

Download the IT Cost Forecasting and Budgeting Workbook

InputOutput
  • Knowledge of organization’s context, culture, and operations
  • A list of assumptions that will form the logical foundation of your forecasting decisions
  • Identification of the primary budget scenario and alternatives
MaterialsParticipants
  • Whiteboard/flip charts
  • Head of IT
  • IT Financial Lead
  • Other IT Management

Before diving into actual forecasting, get clear on project and non-project CapEx and OpEx

Traditional, binary “CapEx vs. OpEx” distinctions don’t seem adequate for showing where expenditure is really going. We’ve added a new facet to help further differentiate one-time project costs from recurring “business as usual” expenses.

Project CapEx
Includes all workforce and vendor costs associated with planning and execution of projects largely focused on the acquisition or creation of new capital assets.

Non-project CapEx
Includes “business as usual” capital asset acquisition in the interest of managing, maintaining, or supporting ongoing performance of existing infrastructure or services, such as replacement network equipment, end-user hardware (e.g. laptops), or disaster recovery/business continuity redundancies. Also includes ongoing asset depreciation amounts.

Non-project OpEx
Includes all recurring, non-CapEx “business as usual” costs such as labor compensation and training, cloud-based software fees, outsourcing costs, managed services fees, subscriptions, and other discretionary spend.

Depreciation is technically CapEx. However, for practical purposes, most organizations list it under OpEx, which can cause it to get lost in the noise. Here, depreciation is under non-project CapEx to keep its true CapEx nature visible and in the company of other “business as usual” capital purchases that will ultimately join the depreciation ranks.

Forecast your project CapEx costs

This process can be simple as far as overall budget forecasting is concerned. If it isn’t simple now, plan to make it simpler next time around.

What to expect…

  • Ideally, the costs for all projects should have been thoroughly estimated, reviewed, and accepted by a steering committee, your CFO, or other approving entity at the start of the budgeting season, and funding already committed to. In a nutshell, forecasting your project costs should already have been done and will only require plugging in those numbers.
  • If projects have yet to be pitched and rubber stamped, know that your work is cut out for you. Doing things in a rush or without proper due diligence will result in certain costs being missed. This means that you risk going far over budget in terms of actuals next year, or having to borrow from other areas in your budget to cover unplanned or underestimated project costs.

Key forecasting principles…

Develop rigorous business cases
Secure funding approval well in advance
Tie back costs benefitting business units
Consider the longer-term OpEx impact

For more information about putting together sound business cases for different projects and circumstances, see the following Info-Tech blueprints:

Build a Comprehensive Business Case

Fund Innovation with a Minimum Viable Business Case

Reduce Time to Consensus with an Accelerated Business Case

Apply these project CapEx forecasting tips

A good project CapEx forecast requires steady legwork, not last-minute fast thinking.

Tip #1: Don’t surprise your approvers. Springing a capital project on approvers at your formal presentation isn’t a good idea and stands a good chance of rejection, so do whatever you can to lock these costs down well in advance.

Tip #2: Project costs should be entirely comprised of CapEx if possible. Keep in mind that some of these costs will convert to depreciated non-project CapEx and non-project OpEx as they transition from project costs to ongoing “business as usual” costs, usually in the fiscal year following the year of expenditure. Creating projections for the longer-term impacts of these project CapEx costs on future types of expenditure is a good idea. Remember that a one-time project is not the same thing as a one-time cost.

Tip #3: Capitalize any employee labor costs on capital projects. This ensures the true costs of projects are not underestimated and that operational staff aren’t being used for free at the expense of their regular duties.

Tip #4: Capitalizing cloud costs in year one of a formal implementation project is usually acceptable. It’s possible to continue treating cloud costs as CapEx with some vendors via something called reserved instances, but organizations report that this is a lot of work to set up. In the end, most capitalized cloud will convert into non-project OpEx in years two and beyond.

Tip #5: Build in some leeway. By the time a project is initiated, circumstances may have changed dramatically from when it was first pitched and approved, including business priorities and needs, vendor pricing, and skillset availability. Your costing may become completely out of date. It’s a good practice to work within more general cost ranges than with specific numbers, to give you the flexibility to respond and adapt during actual execution.

3.2 Forecast your project CapEx

Time: Depends on size of project portfolio

  1. Download the IT Cost Forecasting and Budgeting Workbook and navigate to Tab 5, “Project CapEx Forecast”. Add more columns as required. Enter the following for all projects:
    • Row 5 – Its name and/or unique identifier.
    • Row 6 – Its known or estimated project start/end dates.
    • Row 7 – Its status (in proposal, committed, or in progress).
  2. Distribute each project’s costs across the categories listed for each view you’ve selected to map. Do not include any OpEx here – it will be mapped separately under non-project OpEx.
  3. Rationalize your values. A running per-project total for each view, as well as totals for all projects combined, are in rows 16, 28, 39, and 43. Ensure these totals match or are very close across all the views you are mapping. If they don’t match, review the views that are lower-end outliers as there’s a good chance something has been overlooked.

Download the IT Cost Forecasting and Budgeting Workbook

InputOutput
  • Project proposals and plans, including cost estimations
  • A project CapEx forecast for next fiscal year
MaterialsParticipants
  • IT Cost Forecasting and Budgeting Workbook
  • Whiteboard/flip charts
  • Head of IT
  • IT Financial Lead
  • Other IT Management

Forecast your non-project OpEx

Most of your budget will be non-project OpEx, so plan to spend most of your forecasting effort here.

What to expect…

Central to the definition of OpEx is the fact that it’s ongoing. It rarely stops, and tends to steadily increase over time due to factors like inflation, rising vendor prices, growing organizational growth, increases in the salary expectations of employees, and other factors.

The only certain ways to reduce OpEx are to convert it to capitalizable expenditure, decrease staffing costs, not pursue cloud technologies, or for the organization to simply not grow. For most organizations, none of these approaches are feasible. Smaller scale efficiencies and optimizations can keep OpEx from running amok, but they won’t change its overall upward trajectory over time. Expect it to increase.

Key forecasting principles…

Focus on optimization and efficiency.
Aim for full spend transparency.
Think about appropriate chargeback options.
Give it the time it deserves.

For more information about how to make the most out of your IT OpEx, see the following Info-Tech blueprints:

Develop Your Cost Optimization Roadmap

Achieve IT Spend & Staffing Transparency

Discover the Hidden Costs of Outsourcing

Apply these non-project OpEx forecasting tips

A good forecast is in the details, so take a very close look to see what’s really there.

Tip #1: Consider zero-based budgeting. You don’t have to do this every year, but re-rationalizing your OpEx every few years, or a just a segment of it on a rotational basis, will not only help you readily justify the expenditure but also find waste and inefficiencies you didn’t know existed.

Tip #2: Capitalize your employee capital project work. While some organizations aren’t allowed to do this, others who can simply don’t bother. Unfortunately, this act can bloat the OpEx side of the equation substantially. Many regular employees spend a significant amount of their time working on capital projects, but this fact is invisible to the business. This is why the business keeps asking why it takes so many people to run IT.

Tip #3: Break out your cloud vs. on-premises costs. Burying cloud apps costs in a generic software bucket works against any transparency ambitions you may have. If you have anything resembling a cloud strategy, you need to track, report, and plan for these costs separately in order to measure benefits realization. This goes for cloud infrastructure costs, too.

Tip #4: Spend time on your CIO service view forecast. Completing this view counts as a first step toward service-based costing and is a good starting point for setting up an accurate service catalog. If looking for cost reductions, you’ll want to examine your forecasts in this view as there will likely be service-level reductions you’ll need to propose to hit your cost-cutting goals.

Tip #5: Budget with consideration for chargeback. chargeback mechanisms for OpEx can be challenging to manage and have political repercussions, but they do shift accountability back to the business, guarantee that the IT bills get paid, and reduce IT’s OpEx burden. Selectively charging business units for applications that only they use may be a good entry point into chargeback. It may also be as far as you want to go with it. Doing the CXO business view forecast will provide insight into your opportunities here.

Forecast your non-project CapEx

These costs are often the smallest percentage of overall expenditure but one of the biggest sources of financial grief for IT.

What to expect…

  • These costs can be hard to predict. Anticipating expenditure on end-user hardware such as laptops depends on knowing how many new staff will be hired by the organization next year. Predicting the need to buy networking hardware depends on knowing if, and when, a critical piece of equipment is going to spontaneously fail. You can never be completely sure.
  • IT often must reallocate funds from other areas of its budget to cover non-project CapEx costs. Unfortunately, keeping the network running and ensuring employees have access to that network is seen exclusively as an IT problem, not a business problem. Plan to change this mindset.

Key forecasting principles…

Discuss hiring plans with the business.
Pay close attention to your asset lifecycles.
Prepare to advise about depreciation schedules.
Build in contingency for the unexpected.

For more information about ensuring IT isn’t left in the lurch when it comes to non-project CapEx, see the following Info-Tech blueprints:

Manage End-User Devices

Develop an Availability and Capacity Management Plan

Modernize the Network

Apply these non-project CapEx forecasting tips

A good forecast relies on your ability to accurately predict the future.

Tip #1: Top up new hire estimations: Talk to every business unit leader about their concrete hiring plans, not their aspirations. Get a number, increase that number by 25% or 20 FTEs (whichever is less), and use this new number to calculate your end-user non-project CapEx.

Tip #2: Make an arrangement for who’s paying for operational technology (OT) devices and equipment. OT involves specialized devices such as in-the-field sensors, scanners, meters, and other networkable equipment. Historically, operational units have handled this themselves, but this has created security problems and they still rely on IT for support. Sort the financials out now, including whose budget device and equipment purchases appear on, as well as what accommodations IT will need to make in its own budget to support them.

Tip #3: Evaluate cloud infrastructure and managed services. These can dramatically reduce your non-project CapEx, particularly on the network and data center fronts. However, these solutions aren’t necessarily less expensive and will drive up OpEx, so tread cautiously.

Tip #4: Definitely do an inventory. If you haven’t invested in IT asset management, put it on your project and budgetary agenda. You can’t manage what you don’t know you have, so asset discovery should be your first order of business. From there, start gathering asset lifecycle information and build in alerting to aid your spend planning.

Tip #5: Think about retirement: What assets are nearing end of life or the end of their depreciation schedule? What impact is this having on non-project OpEx in terms of maintenance and support? Deciding to retire, replace, or extend an IT operational asset will change your non-project CapEx outlook and will affect costs in other areas.

Tip #6: Create a contingency fund: You need one to deal with surprises and emergencies, so why wait?

Document the organization’s projected FTEs by business function

This data point is usually missing from IT’s budget forecasting data set. Try to get it.

A powerful metric to share with business stakeholders is expenditure per employee or FTE. It’s powerful because:

  • It’s one of the few metrics that’s intuitively understood by most people
  • It can show changes in IT expenditure over time at both granular and general levels.

This metric is one of the simplest to calculate. The challenge is in getting your hands on the data in the first place.

  • Most business unit leaders struggle to pin down this number in terms of actuals as they have difficulty determining what an FTE actually is. Does it include contract staff? Part-time staff? Seasonal workers? Volunteers and interns? And if the business unit has high turnover, this number can fluctuate significantly.
  • Encourage your business peers to produce a rational estimate. Unlike the headcount number you’re seeking to forecast for non-project capital expenditure for end-user hardware, this FTE number should strive to be more in the ballpark, as you’re not using it to ensure sufficient funds but comparatively track expenditure year to year.
  • Depending on your industry, employees or FTEs may not be the best measurement. Use what works best for you. Number of unique users is a common one. Other industry-specific examples include per student, per bed, per patient, per account, and per resident.

Start to build in long-term and short-term forecasting into your budgeting process

These are growing practices in mature IT organizations that afford significant flexibility.

Short-term forecasting:

Long-term forecasting:

  • At Donaldson Company, budgeting is a once-a-year event, but they’ve started formalizing a forecast review three times a year.
  • These mini-forecasts are not as full blown as the annual forecasting process. Rather, they look at specific parts of the budget and update it based on changing realities.

“It’s a great step in the right direction. We look at
the current, and then the future. What we’re really pushing is how to keep that outyear spend more in discussion. The biggest thing we’re trying to do when we approve projects is look at what does that approval do to outyear spend? Is it going to increase? Is it going to decrease? Will we be spending more on licensing? On people?”

– Kristen Thurber, IT Director, Office of the CIO,
Donaldson Company

  • In 2017, the Hawaii Medical Service Association accepted the fact that they were very challenged with legacy systems. They needed to modernize.
  • They created a multi-year strategic budget -- a five-year investment plan. This plan was a success. They were able to gain approval for a five-year horizon with variable allocations per year, as required.

“This approach was much better. We now
have a “guarantee” of funding for five years now – they’ve conceptually agreed. Now we don’t have
to make that request for new money every time
if we need more. We can vary the amount every
year – it doesn’t have to be the same.”

– Trisha Goya, Director, IT Governance & Administration,
Hawaii Medical Service Association

3.4 Forecast your non-project OpEx and CapEx

Time: Depends on size of vendor portfolio and workforce

  1. Download the IT Cost Forecasting and Budgeting Workbook and navigate to Tab 4, “Business as Usual Forecast”. This tab assumes an incremental budgeting approach. Last year’s actuals have been carried forward for you to build upon.
  2. Enter expected percentage-based cost increases/decreases for next fiscal year for each of the following variables (columns E-I): inflation, vendor pricing, labor costs, service levels, and depreciation. Do this for all sub-categories for the ITFM cost model views you’ve opted to map. Provide rationales for your percentage values in column K.
  3. In columns M and N, enter the anticipated percentage allocation of cost to non-project CapEx versus non-project OpEx.
  4. In column O, rows 29-38, enter the projected FTEs for each business function (if available).
  5. If you choose, make longer-term, high-level forecasts for 2-3 years in the future in columns P-U. Performing longer-term forecasts for at least the CFO expense view categories is recommended.

Download the IT Cost Forecasting and Budgeting Workbook

Input Output
  • Last fiscal year’s actuals
  • Knowledge of likely inflation, vendor cost, and salary expectations for next fiscal year
  • Depreciation amounts
  • A non-project OpEx and CapEx forecast for next fiscal year
Materials Participants
  • Whiteboard/flip charts
  • Head of IT
  • IT Financial Lead
  • Other IT Management

Case Study

INDUSTRY: Insurance

SOURCE: Anonymous

Challenge

Solution

Results

In his first run at the annual budgeting process, a new CIO received delivery dates from Finance and spent the next three months building the budget for the next fiscal year.

He discovered that the organization had been underinvesting in IT for a long time. There were platforms without support, no accounting for currency exchange rates on purchases, components that had not be upgraded in 16 years, big cybersecurity risks, and 20 critical incidences a month.

In his budget, the CIO requested a 22-24% increase in IT expenditure to deal with the critical gaps, and provided a detailed defense of his proposal

But the new CIO’s team and Finance were frustrated with him. He asked his IT finance leader why. She said she didn’t understand what his direction was and why the budgeting process was taking so long – his predecessor did the budget in only two days. He would add up the contracts, add 10% for inflation, and that’s it.

Simply put, the organization hadn’t taken budgeting seriously. By doing it right, the new CIO had inadvertently challenged the status quo.

The CIO ended up under-executing his first budget by 12% but is tracking closer to plan this year. Significantly, he’s been able cut critical incidences from 20 down to only 2-3 per month.

Some friction persists with the CFO, who sees him as a “big spender,” but he believes that this friction has forced him to be even better.

Phase recap: Develop your forecasts

The hard math is done. Now it’s time to step back and craft your final proposed budget and its key messages.

This phase focused on developing your forecasts and proposed budget for next fiscal year. It included:

  • Developing assumptions and alternative scenarios. These will showcase your understanding of business context as well as what’s most likely to happen (or should happen) next year.
  • Forecasting your project CapEx costs. If these costs weren’t laid out already in formal, approved project proposals or plans, now you know why it’s the better approach for developing a budget.
  • Forecasting your non-project CapEx and OpEx costs. Now you should have more clarity and transparency concerning where these costs are going and exactly why they need to go there.

“Ninety percent of your projects will get started but a good 10% will never get off the ground because of capacity or the business changes their mind or other priorities are thrown in. There are always these sorts of challenges that come up.”

– Theresa Hughes, Executive Counselor,
Info-Tech Research Group
and Former IT Executive

Phase 4

Build Your Proposed Budget

Lay Your
Foundation

Get Into Budget-Starting Position

Develop Your
Forecasts

Build Your
Proposed Budget

Create and Deliver Your Presentation

1.1 Understand what your budget is
and does

1.2 Know your stakeholders

1.3 Continuously pre-sell your budget

2.1 Assemble your resources

2.2 Understand the four views of the ITFM Cost Model

2.3 Review last year’s budget vs.
actuals and five-year historical trends

2.4 Set your high-level goals

3.1 Develop assumptions and
alternative scenarios

3.2 Forecast your project CapEx

3.3 Forecast your non-project CapEx and OpEx

4.1 Aggregate your numbers

4.2 Stress test your forecasts

4.3 Challenge and perfect your
rationales

5.1 Plan your content

5.2 Build your presentation

5.3 Present to stakeholders

5.4 Make final adjustments and submit your IT budget

This phase will walk you through the following activities:

  • Pulling your forecasts together into a comprehensive IT budget for next fiscal year.
  • Double checking your forecasts to ensure they’re accurate.
  • Fine tuning the rationales behind your proposals.

This phase involves the following participants:

  • Head of IT
  • IT Financial Lead
  • Other IT Management

Build your proposed budget

Triple check your numbers and put the finishing touches on your approval-winning rationales.

This phase is where your analysis and decision making finally come together into a coherent budget proposal. Key steps include:

  • Aggregating your numbers. This step involves pulling together your project CapEx, non-project CapEx, and non-project OpEx forecasts into a comprehensive whole and sanity-checking your expenditure-type ratios.
  • Stress-testing your forecasts. Do some detailed checks to ensure everything’s accounted for and you haven’t overlooked any significant information or factors that could affect your forecasted costs.
  • Challenging and perfecting your rationales. Your ability to present hard evidence and rational explanations in support of your proposed budget is often the difference between a yes or a no. Look at your proposals from different stakeholder perspectives and ask yourself, “Would I say yes to this if I were them?”

“We don’t buy servers and licenses because we want to. We buy them because we have to. IT doesn’t need those servers out at our data center provider, network connections, et cetera. Only a fraction of these costs are to support us in the IT department. IT doesn’t have control over these costs because we’re not the consumers.”

– Matt Johnson, IT Director Governance and Business Solutions, Milwaukee County

Great rationales do more than set you up for streamlined budgetary approval

Rationales build credibility and trust in your business capabilities. They can also help stop the same conversations happening year after year.

Any item in your proposed budget can send you down a rabbit hole if not thoroughly defensible.

You probably won’t need to defend every item, but it’s best to be prepared to do so. Ask yourself:

  • What areas of spend does the CFO come back to year after year? Is it some aspect of OpEx, such as workforce costs or cloud software fees? Is it the relationship between proposed project spend and business benefits? Provide detailed and transparent rationales for these items to start re-directing long-term conversations to more strategic issues.
  • What areas of spend seem to be recurring points of conflict with business unit leaders? Is it surprise spend that comes from business decisions that didn’t include IT? Is it business-unit leaders railing against chargeback? Have frank, information-sharing conversations focused on business applications, service-level requirements, and true IT costs to support them.
  • What’s on the CEO’s mind? Are they focused on entering a new overseas market, which will require capital investment? Are they interested in the potential of a new technology because competitors are adopting it? It may not be the same focus as last year, so ensure you have fresh rationales that show how IT will help deliver on these business goals.

“Budgets get out of control when one department fails to care for the implications of change within another department's budget. This wastes time, reduces accuracy and causes conflict.”

– Tara Kinney, Atomic Revenue, LLC.

Rationalizing costs depends on the intention of the spend

Not all spending serves the same purpose. Some types require deeper or different justifications than others.

For the business, there are two main purposes for spend:

  1. Spending that drives revenues or the customer experience. Think in terms of return on investment (ROI), i.e. when will the expenditure pay for itself via the revenue gains it helps create?
  2. Spending that mitigates and manages risk. Think in terms of cost-benefit, i.e. what are the costs of doing something versus doing nothing at all?
Source: Kris Blackmon, NetSuite Brainyard.

“Approval came down to ROI and the ability to show benefits realization for years one, two, and three through five.”

– Duane Cooney, Executive Counselor, Info-Tech Research Group, and Former Healthcare CIO

Regardless of its ultimate purpose, all expenditure needs statements of assumptions, obstacles, and likelihood of goals being realized behind it.

  • What are the assumptions that went into the calculation?
  • Is the spend new or a reallocation (and from where)?
  • What’s the likelihood of realizing returns or benefits?
  • What are potential obstacles to realizing returns or benefits?

Rationales aren’t only for capital projects – they can and should be applied to all proposed OpEx and CapEx. Business project rationales tend to drive revenue and the customer experience, demanding ROI calculations. Internal IT-projects and non-project expenditure are often focused on mitigating and managing risk, requiring cost-benefit analysis.

First, make sure your numbers add up

There are a lot of numbers flying around during a budgeting process. Now’s the time to get out of the weeds, look at the big picture, and ensure everything lines up.

Overall

Non-Project OpEx

Non-Project CapEx

Project CapEx

  • Is your proposed budget consistent with previous IT expenditure patterns?
  • Did you account for major known anomalies or events?
  • Is your final total in line with your CFO’s communicated targets and expectations?
  • Are your alternative scenarios realistic and reflective of viable economic contexts that your organization could find itself in in the near term?
  • Are the OpEx-to-CapEx ratios sensible?
  • Does it pass your gut check?
  • Did you research and verify market rates for employees and skill sets?
  • Did you research and verify likely vendor pricing and potential increases?
  • Are cost categories with variances greater than +5% backed up by defensible IT hiring plans or documented operational growth or improvement initiatives?
  • Have you accounted for the absorption of previous capital project costs into day-to-day management, maintenance, and support operations?
  • Do you have accurate depreciation amounts and timeframes for their discontinuation?
  • Are any variances driven by confirmed business plans to increase headcount, necessitating purchase of end-user hardware and on-premises software licenses?
  • Are any variances due to net-new planned/contingency purchases or the retirement of depreciable on-premises equipment?
  • Is funding for all capital projects represented reliable, i.e. has it been approved?
  • Are all in-progress, proposed, or committed project CapEx costs backed up with reliable estimates and full project documentation?
  • Do capital project costs include the capitalizable costs of employees working on those projects, and were these amounts deducted from non-project OpEx?
  • Have you estimated the longer-term OpEx impact of your current capital projects?

4.1 Aggregate your proposed budget numbers and stress test your forecasts

2 hours

  1. Download the IT Cost Forecasting and Budgeting Workbook for this activity. If you have been using it thus far, the Workbook will have calculated your numbers for you across the four views of the ITFM Cost Model on Tab 7, “Proposed Budget”, including:
    1. Forecasted non-project OpEx, non-project CapEx (including depreciation values), project CapEx, and total values.
    2. Numerical and percentage variances from the previous year.
  2. Test and finalize your forecasts by applying the questions on the previous slide.
  3. Flag cost categories where large variances from the previous year or large numbers in general appear – you will need to ensure your rationales for these variances are rigorous in the next step.
  4. Make amendments if needed to Tabs 4, “Business as Usual Forecast” and 5, “Project CapEx Forecast” in the IT Cost Forecasting and Budgeting Workbook.

Download the IT Cost Forecasting and Budgeting Workbook

InputOutputMaterialsParticipants
  • Final drafts of all IT cost forecasts
  • A final proposed IT budget
  • IT Cost Forecasting and Budgeting Workbook
  • Whiteboard/flip charts
  • Head of IT
  • IT Financial Lead
  • Other IT Management

Case Study

INDUSTRY: Healthcare

SOURCE: Anonymous

Challenge

Solution

Results

A senior nursing systems director needed the CIO’s help. She wanted to get a project off the ground, but it wasn’t getting priority or funding.

Nurses were burning out. Many were staying one to two hours late per shift to catch up on patient notes. Their EHR platform had two problematic workflows, each taking up to about 15 minutes per nurse per patient to complete. These workflows were complex, of no value, and just not getting done. She needed a few million dollars to make the fix.

The CIO worked with the director to do the math. In only a few hours, they realized that the savings from rewriting the workflows would allow them to hire over 500 full-time nurses.

The benefits realized would not only help reduce nurse workload and generate savings, but also increase the amount of time spent with patients and number of patients seen overall. They redid the math several times to ensure they were right.

The senior nursing systems director presented to her peers and leadership, and eventually to the Board of Directors. The Board immediately saw the benefits and promoted the project to first on the list ahead of all other projects.

This collaborative approach to generating project benefits statements helped the CIO gain trust and pave the way for future budgets.

The strength of your rationales will determine how readily your budget is approved

When proposing expenditure, you need to thoroughly consider the organization’s goals, its governance culture, and the overall feasibility of what’s being asked.

First, recall what budgets are really about.

The completeness, accuracy, and granularity of your numbers and thorough ROI calculations for projects are essential. They will serve you well in getting the CFO’s attention. However, the numbers will only get you halfway there. Despite what some people think, the work in setting a budget is more about the what, how, and why – that is, the rationale – than about the how much.

Next, revisit Phase 1 of this blueprint and review:

  • Your organization’s budgeting culture and processes.
  • The typical accountabilities, priorities, challenges, opportunities, and expectations associated with your CFO, CEO, and CXO IT budget stakeholders.
  • Your budgetary mandate as the head of IT.

Then, look at each component of your proposed budget through each of these three rationale-building lenses.

Business goals
What are the organization’s strategic priorities?

Governance culture
How constrained is the decision-making process?

Feasibility
Can we make it happen?

Linking proposed spend to strategic goals isn’t just for strategic project CapEx

Tie in your “business as usual” non-project OpEx and CapEx, as well.

Business goals

What are the organization’s strategic priorities?

Context

This is all about external factors, namely the broader economic, political, and industry contexts in which the organization operates.

Lifecycle position

The stage the organization is at in terms of growth, stability, or decline will drive decisions, priorities, and the ability to spend or invest.

Opportunities

Context and lifecycle position determine opportunities, which are often defined in terms of potential cost savings
or ROI.

Tie every element in your proposed budget to an organizational goal.

Non-project OpEx

  • Remember that OpEx is what comes from the realization of past strategic goals. If that past goal is still valid, then the OpEx that keeps that goal alive is, too.
  • Business viability and continuity are often unexpressed goals. OpEx directly supports these goals.
  • Periodically apply zero-based budgeting to OpEx to re-rationalize and identify waste.

Non-project CapEx

  • Know the impact of any business growth goals on future headcount – this is essential to rationalize laptop/desktop and other end-user hardware spend.
  • Position infrastructure equipment spend in terms of having sufficient capacity to support growth goals as well as ensuring network/system reliability and continuity.
  • Leverage depreciation schedules as backup.

Project CapEx

  • Challenge business-driven CapEx projects if they don’t directly support stated goals.
  • Ideally, the goal-supporting rationales for software, hardware, and workforce CapEx have been laid out in an already-approved project proposal. Refer to these plans.
  • If pitching a capital project at the last minute, especially an IT-driven one, expect a “no” regardless of how well it ties to goals.

Your governance culture will determine what you need to show and when you show it

The rigor of your rationales is entirely driven by “how things are done around here.”

Governance Culture

How rigorous/ constrained
is decision-making?

Risk tolerance

This is the organization’s willingness to be flexible, take chances, make change, and innovate. It is often driven by legal and regulatory mandates.

Control

Control manifests in the number and nature of rules and how authority and accountability are centralized or distributed in the organization.

Speed to action

How quickly decisions are made and executed upon is determined by the amount of consultation and number of approval steps.

Ensure all parts of your proposed budget align with what’s tolerated and allowed.

Non-project OpEx

  • Don’t hide OpEx. If it’s a dirty word, put it front and center to start normalizing it.
  • As with business goals, position OpEx as necessary for business continuity and risk mitigation, as well as the thing that keeps long-term strategic goals alive.
  • Focus on efficiency and cost control, both in terms of past and future initiatives, regardless of the governance culture.

Non-project CapEx

  • Treat non-project CapEx in the same way as you would non-project OpEx.
  • IT must make purchases quickly in this area of spend, but drawn-out procurement processes can make this impossible. Consider including a separate proposal to establish a policy that gives IT the control to make end-user and network/data center equipment purchases faster and easier.

Project CapEx

  • If your organization is risk-averse, highly centralized, or slow to act, don’t expect IT to win approval for innovative capital projects. Let the business make any pitches and have IT serve in a supporting role.
  • Capital projects are often committed to 6-12 months in advance and can’t be completed within a fiscal year. Nudge the organization toward longer-term, flexible funding.

No matter which way your goals and culture lean, ground all your rationales in reality

Objective, unapologetic facts are your strongest rationale-building tool.

Feasibility

Can we do it, and what sacrifices will we have to make?

Funding

The ultimate determinant of feasibility is the availability, quantity, and reliability of funding next fiscal year and over the long term to support investment.

Capabilities

Success hinges on both the availability and accessibility of required skills and knowledge to execute on a spend plan in the required timeframe.

Risk

Risk is not just about obstacles to success and what could happen if you do something – it’s also about what could happen if you do nothing at all.

Vet every part of your proposed budget to ensure what you’re asking for is both realistic and possible.

Non-project OpEx

  • Point out your operational waste-reduction and efficiency-gaining efforts in hard, numerical terms.
  • Clearly demonstrate that OpEx cannot be reduced without sacrifices on the business side, specifically in terms of service levels.
  • Define OpEx impacts for all CapEx proposals to ensure funding commitments include long-term maintenance and support.

Non-project CapEx

  • This is a common source of surprise budget overage, and IT often sacrifices parts of its OpEx budget to cover it. Shed light on this problem and define IT’s boundaries.
  • A core infrastructure equipment contingency fund and a policy mandating business units pay for unbudgeted end-user tech due to unplanned or uncommunicated headcount increases are worth pursuing.

Project CapEx

  • Be sure IT is involved with every capital project proposal that has a technological implication (which is usually all of them).
  • Specifically, IT should take on responsibility for tech vendor evaluation and negotiation. Never leave this up to the business.
  • Ensure IT gains funding for supporting any technologies acquired via a capital planning process, including hiring if necessary.

Double-check to ensure your bases are covered

Detailed data and information checklist:

  • I have the following data and information for each item of proposed expenditure:
  • Sponsors, owners, and/or managers from IT and the business.
  • CapEx and OpEx costs broken down by workforce (employees/contract) and vendor (software, hardware, services) at a minimum for both last fiscal year (if continuing spend) and next fiscal year to demonstrate any changes.
  • Projected annual costs for the above, extending two to five years into the future, with dates when new spending will start, known depreciations will end, and CapEx will transition to OpEx.
  • Descriptions of any tradeoffs or potential obstacles.
  • Lifespan information for new, proposed assets informing depreciation scheduling.
  • Sources of funding (especially if new, transferred, or changed).
  • Copies of any research used to inform any of the above.

High-level rationale checklist:

  • I have done the following thinking and analysis for each item of proposed expenditure:
  • Considered it in the context of my organization’s broader operating environment and the constraints and opportunities this creates.
  • Tied it – directly or indirectly – to the achievement or sustainment of current or past (but still relevant) organizational goals.
  • Understood my organization’s tolerances, how things get done, and whether I can win any battles that I need to fight given these realities.
  • Worked with business unit leaders to fully understand their plans and how IT can support them.
  • Obtained current, verifiable data and information and have a good idea if, when, and how this information may change next year.
  • Assessed benefits, risks, dependencies, and overall feasibility, as well as created ROI statements where needed.
  • Stuck to the facts and am confident they can speak for themselves.

For more on creating detailed business cases for projects and investments, see Info-Tech’s comprehensive blueprint, Build a Comprehensive Business Case.

4.2 Challenge and perfect your rationales

2 hours

  1. Based on your analysis in Phase 1, review your organization’s current and near-term business goals (context, lifecycle position, opportunities), governance culture (risk tolerance, control, speed to action), and feasibility (funding, capabilities, risk) to understand what’s possible, what’s not, and your general boundaries.
  2. Review your proposed budget in its current form and flag items that may be difficult or impossible to sell, given the above.
  3. Systematically go through each item in you proposed budget and apply the detailed data and information and high-level rationale checklists on the previous slide to ensure you have considered it from every angle and have all the information you need to defend it.
  4. Track down any additional information needed to fill gaps and fine-tune your budget based on any discoveries, including eliminating or adding elements if needed.

Download the IT Cost Forecasting and Budgeting Workbook

InputOutput
  • Final drafts of all IT cost forecasts, including rationales
  • Fully rationalized proposed IT budget for next fiscal year
MaterialsParticipants
  • IT Cost Forecasting and Budgeting Workbook
  • Whiteboard/flip charts
  • Head of IT
  • IT Financial Lead
  • Other IT Management

Phase recap: Build your proposed budget

You can officially say your proposed IT budget is done. Now for the communications part.

This phase is where everything came together into a coherent budget proposal. You were able to:

  • Aggregate your numbers. This involved pulling for project and non-project CapEx and OpEx forecasts into a single proposed IT budget total.
  • Stress-test your forecasts. Here, you ensured that all your numbers were accurate and made sense.
  • Challenge and perfect your rationales. Finally, you made sure you have all your evidence in place and can defend every component in your proposed IT budget regardless of who’s looking at it.

“Current OpEx is about supporting and aligning with past business strategies. That’s alignment. If the business wants to give up on those past business strategies, that’s up to them.”

– Darin Stahl, Distinguished Analyst and Research Fellow, Info-Tech Research Group

Phase 5

Create and Deliver Your Presentation

Lay Your
Foundation

Get Into Budget-Starting Position

Develop Your
Forecasts

Build Your
Proposed Budget

Create and Deliver Your Presentation

1.1 Understand what your budget is
and does

1.2 Know your stakeholders

1.3 Continuously pre-sell your budget

2.1 Assemble your resources

2.2 Understand the four views of the ITFM Cost Model

2.3 Review last year’s budget vs.
actuals and five-year historical trends

2.4 Set your high-level goals

3.1 Develop assumptions and
alternative scenarios

3.2 Forecast your project CapEx

3.3 Forecast your non-project CapEx and OpEx

4.1 Aggregate your numbers

4.2 Stress test your forecasts

4.3 Challenge and perfect your
rationales

5.1 Plan your content

5.2 Build your presentation

5.3 Present to stakeholders

5.4 Make final adjustments and submit your IT budget

This phase will walk you through the following activities:

  • Planning the content you’ll include in your budget presentation.
  • Pulling together your formal presentation.
  • Presenting, finalizing, and submitting your budget.

This phase involves the following participants:

  • Head of IT
  • IT Financial Lead
  • Other IT Management

Create and deliver your presentation

Pull it all together into something you can show your approvers and stakeholders and win IT budgetary approval.

This phase focuses on developing your final proposed budget presentation for delivery to your various stakeholders. Here you will:

  • Plan your final content. Decide the narrative you want to tell and select the visualizations and words you want to include in your presentation (or presentations) depending on the makeup of your target audience.
  • Build your presentation. Pull together all the key elements in a PowerPoint template in a way that best tells the IT budget story.
  • Present to stakeholders. Deliver your IT budgetary message.
  • Make final adjustments and submit your budget. Address any questions, make final changes, and deconstruct your budget into the account categories mandated by your Finance Department to plug into the budget template they’ve provided.

“I could have put the numbers together in a week. The process of talking through what the divisions need and spending time with them is more time consuming than the budget itself.”

– Jay Gnuse, IT Director, Chief Industries

The content you select to present depends on your objectives and constraints

Info-Tech classifies potential content according to three basic types: mandatory, recommended, and optional. What’s the difference?

Mandatory: Just about every CFO or approving body will expect to see this information. Often high level in nature, it includes:

  • A review of last year’s performance.
  • A comparison of proposed budget totals to last year’s actuals.
  • A breakdown of CapEx vs. OpEx.
  • A breakdown of proposed expenditure according to traditional workforce and vendor costs.

Recommended: This information builds on the mandatory elements, providing more depth and detail. Inclusion of recommended content depends on:

  • Availability of the information.
  • Relevance to a current strategic focus or overarching initiative in the organization.
  • Known business interest in the topic, or the topic’s ability to generate interest in IT budgetary concerns in general.

Optional: This is very detailed information that provides alternative views and serves as reinforcement of your key messages. Consider including it if:

  • You need to bring fuller transparency to a murky IT spending situation.
  • Your audience is open to it, i.e. it wouldn’t be seen as irrelevant, wasting their time, or a cause of discord.
  • You have ample time during your presentation to dive into it.

Deciding what to include or exclude depends 100% on your target audience. What will fulfill their basic information needs as well as increase their engagement in IT financial issues?

Revisit your assumptions and alternative scenarios first

These represent the contextual framework for your proposal and explain why you made the decisions you did.

Stating your assumptions and presenting at least two alternative scenarios helps in the following ways:

  1. Identifies the factors you considered when setting budget targets and proposing specific expenditures, and shows that you know what the important factors are.
  2. Lays the logical foundation for all the rationales you will be presenting.
  3. Demonstrates that you’ve thought broadly about the future of the organization and how IT is best able to support that future organization regardless of its state and circumstances.

Your assumptions and alternative scenarios may not appear back-to-back in your presentation, yet they’re intimately connected in that every unique scenario is based on adjustments to your core assumptions. These tweaks – and the resulting scenarios – reflect the different degrees of probability that a variable is likely to land on a certain value (i.e. an alternative assumption).

Your primary scenario is the one you believe is most likely to happen and is represented by the complete budget you’re recommending and presenting.

Target timeframe for presentation: 2 minutes

Key objectives: Setting context, demonstrating breadth of thought.

Potential content for section:

  • List of assumptions for the budget being presented (primary target scenario).
  • Two or more alternative scenarios.

“Things get cut when the business
doesn’t know what something is,
doesn’t recognize it, doesn’t understand it. There needs to be an education.”

– Angie Reynolds, Principal Research Director, ITFM Practice,
Info-Tech Research Group,

Select your assumptions and scenarios

See Tabs “Planning Variables” and 9, “Alternative Scenarios” in your IT Cost Forecasting and Budgeting Workbook for these outputs.

Core assumptions

Primary target scenario

Alternative scenarios

Full alternative scenario budgets

List

Slide

Slide

Budget

Mandatory: This is a listing of both internal and external factors that are most likely to affect the challenges and opportunities your organization will have and how it can and will operate. This includes negotiable and non-negotiable internal and external constraints, stated priorities, and the expression of known risk factors.

Mandatory: Emanating from your core assumptions, this scenario is a high-level statement of goals, initial budget targets, and proposed budget based on your core assumptions.

Recommended: Two alternatives are typical, with one higher spend and one lower spend than your target. The state of the economy and funding availability are the assumptions usually tweaked. More radical scenarios, like the cost and implications of completely outsourcing IT, can also be explored.

Optional: This is a lot of work, but some IT leaders do it if an alternative scenario is a strong contender or is necessary to show that a proposed direction from the business is costly or not feasible.

The image contains screenshots of tab Planning Variables and Alternative Scenarios.

The first major section of your presentation will be a retrospective

Plan to kick things off with a review of last year’s results, factors that affected what transpired, and longer-term historical IT expenditure trends.

This retrospective on IT expenditure is important for three reasons:

  1. Clarifying definitions and the different categories of IT expenditure.
  2. Showing your stakeholders how, and how well you aligned IT expenditure with business objectives.
  3. Setting stakeholder expectations about what next year’s budget will look like based on past patterns.

You probably won’t have a lot of time for this section, so everything you select to share should pack a punch and perform double duty by introducing concepts you’ll need your stakeholders to have internalized when you present next year’s budget details.

Target timeframe for presentation: 7 minutes

Key objectives: Definitions, alignment, expectations-setting.

Potential content for section:

  • Last fiscal year budgeted vs. actuals
  • Expenditure by type
  • Major capital projects completed
  • Top vendor spend
  • Drivers of last year’s expenditures and efficiencies
  • Last fiscal year in in detail (expense view, service view, business view, innovation view)
  • Expenditure trends for the past five years

“If they don’t know the consequences of their actions, how are they ever going to change their actions?”

– Angela Hintz, VP of PMO & Integrated Services,
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Louisiana

Start at the highest level

See Tabs 1 “Historical Events & Projects,” 3 “Historical Analysis,” and 6 “Vendor Worksheet” in your IT Cost Forecasting and Budgeting Workbook for these outputs.

Total budgeted vs. total actuals

Graph

Mandatory: Demonstrates the variance between what you budgeted for last year and what was actually spent. Explaining causes of variance is key.

l actuals by expenditure type

Graph

Mandatory: Provides a comparative breakdown of last year’s expenditure by non-project OpEx, non-project CapEx, and project CapEx. This offers an opportunity to explain different types of IT expenditure and why they’re the relative size they are.

Major capital projects completed

List

Mandatory: Illustrates progress made toward strategically important objectives.

Top vendors

List

Recommended: A list of vendors that incurred the highest costs, including their relative portion of overall expenditure. These are usually business software vendors, i.e. tools your stakeholders use every day. The number of vendors shown is up to you.

The image contains screenshots from Tabs 1, 3, and 6 of the IT Cost Forecasting and Budgeting Workbook.

Describe drivers of costs and savings

See Tab 1, “Historical Events & Projects” in your IT Cost Forecasting and Budgeting Workbook for these outputs.

Cost drivers

List

Mandatory: A list of major events, circumstances, business decisions, or non-negotiable factors that necessitated expenditure. Be sure to focus on the unplanned or unexpected situations that caused upward variance.

Savings drivers

List

Mandatory: A list of key initiatives pursued, or circumstances that resulted in efficiencies or savings. Include any deferred or canceled projects.

The image contains screenshots from Tab 1 of the IT Cost Forecasting and Budgeting Workbook.

Also calculate and list the magnitude of costs incurred or savings realized in hard financial terms so that the full impact of these events is truly understood by your stakeholders.

“What is that ongoing cost?
If we brought in a new platform, what
does that do to our operating costs?”

– Kristen Thurber, IT Director, Office of the CIO, Donaldson Company

End with longer-term five-year trends

See Tab 3 “Historical Analysis” in your IT Cost Forecasting and Budgeting Workbook for these outputs.

IT actual expenditure
year over year

Graph

Mandatory: This is crucial for showing overall IT expenditure patterns, particularly percentage changes up or down year to year, and what the drivers of those changes were.

IT actuals as a % of organizational revenue

Graph

Mandatory: You need to set the stage for the proposed percentage of organizational revenue to come. The CFO will be looking for consistency and an overall decreasing pattern over time.

IT expenditure per FTE year over year

Graph

Optional: This can be a powerful metric as it’s simple and easily to understand.

The image contains screenshots from Tab 3 of the IT Cost Forecasting and Budgeting Workbook.

The historical analysis you can do is endless. You can generate many more cuts of the data or go back even further – it’s up to you.

Keep in mind that you won’t have a lot of time during your presentation, so stick to the high-level, high-impact graphs that demonstrate overarching trends or themes.

Show different views of the details

See Tab 3 “Historical Analysis” in your IT Cost Forecasting and Budgeting Workbook for these outputs.

Budgeted vs. actuals CFO expense view

Graph

Mandatory: Showing different types of workforce expenditure compared to different types of vendor expenditure will be important to the CFO.

Budgeted vs. actuals CIO services view

Graph

Optional: Showing the expenditure of some IT services will clarify the true total costs of delivering and supporting these services if misunderstandings exist.

Budgeted vs. actuals CXO business view

Graph

Optional: A good way to show true consumption levels and the relative IT haves and have-nots. Potentially political, so consider sharing one-on-one with relevant business unit leaders instead of doing a big public reveal.

Budgeted vs. actual CEO innovation view

Graph

Optional: Clarifies how much the organization is investing in innovation or growth versus keeping the lights on. Of most interest to the CEO and possibly the CFO, and good for starting conversations about how well funding is aligned with strategic directions.

The image contains screenshots from Tab 3 of the IT Cost Forecasting and Budgeting Workbook.

5.1a Select your retrospective content

30 minutes

  1. Open your copy of the IT Cost Forecasting and Budgeting Workbook.
  2. From Tabs 1, “Historical Events & Projects, 3 “Historical Analysis”, and 6, “Vendor Worksheet,” select the visual outputs (graphs and lists) you plan to include in the retrospective section of your presentation. Consider the following when determining what to include or exclude:
    1. Fundamentals: Elements such as budgeted vs. actual, distribution across expenditure types, and drivers of variance are mandatory.
    2. Key clarifications: What expectations need to be set or common misunderstandings cleared up? Strategically insert visuals that introduce and explain important concepts early.
    3. Your time allowance. Plan for a maximum of seven minutes for every half hour of total presentation time.
  3. Note what you plan to include in your presentation and set aside.

Download the IT Cost Forecasting and Budgeting Workbook

InputOutput
  • Data and graphs from the completed IT Cost Forecasting and Budgeting Workbook
  • Selected content and visuals for the historical/ retrospective section of the IT Budget Executive Presentation
MaterialsParticipants
  • Whiteboard/flip charts
  • Head of IT
  • IT Financial Lead
  • Other IT Management

Next, transition from past expenditure to your proposal for the future

Build a logical bridge between what happened in the past to what’s coming up next year using a comparative approach and feature major highlights.

This transitional phase between the past and the future is important for the following reasons:

  1. It illustrates any consistent patterns of IT expenditure that may exist and be relevant in the near term.
  2. It sets the stage for explaining any deviations from historical patterns that you’re about to propose.
  3. It grounds proposed IT expenditure within the context of commitments made in previous years.

Consider this the essential core of your presentation – this is the key message and what your audience came to hear.

Target timeframe for presentation: 10 minutes

Key objectives: Transition, reveal proposed budget.

Potential content for section:

  • Last year’s actuals vs. next year’s proposed.
  • Next year’s proposed budget in context of the past five years’ year-over-year actuals.
  • Last year’s actual expenditure type distribution vs. next year’s proposed budget distribution.
  • Major projects to be started next year.

“The companies...that invest the most in IT aren’t necessarily the best performers.
On average, the most successful small and medium companies are more frugal when it comes to
company spend on IT (as long as they do it judiciously).”

– Source: Techvera, 2023

Compare next year to last year

See Tab 8, “Proposed Budget Analysis” in your IT Cost Forecasting and Budgeting Workbook for these outputs.

Last year’s total actuals vs. next year’s total forecast

Proposed budget in context: Year-over-year expenditure

Last year’s actuals vs. next year’s proposed by expenditure type

Last year’s expenditure per FTE vs. next year’s proposed

Graph

Graph

Graph

Graph

Mandatory: This is the most important graph for connecting the past with the future and is also the first meaningful view your audience will have of your proposed budget for next year.

Mandatory: Here, you will continue the long-term view introduced in your historical data by adding on next year’s projections to your existing five-year historical trend. The percentage change from last year to next year will be the focus.

Recommended: A double-comparative breakdown of last year vs. next year by non-project OpEx, non-project CapEx, and project CapEx illustrates where major events, decisions, and changes are having their impact.

Optional: This graph is particularly useful in demonstrating the success of cost-control if the actual proposed budget is higher that the previous year but the IT cost per employee has gone down.

The image contains screenshots from Tab 8 of the IT Cost Forecasting and Budgeting Workbook.

Select business projects to profile

See Tab 5, “Project CapEx Forecast” in your IT Cost Forecasting and Budgeting Workbook for the data and information to create these outputs.

Major project profile

Slide

Mandatory: Focus on projects for which funding is already committed and lean toward those that are strategic or clearly support business goal attainment. How many you profile is up to you, but three to five is suggested.

Minor project overview

List

Optional: List other projects on IT’s agenda to communicate the scope of IT’s project-related responsibilities and required expenditure to be successful. Include in-progress projects that will be completed next year and net-new projects on the roster.

The image contains screenshots from Tab 5 of the IT Cost Forecasting and Budgeting Workbook.

You can’t profile every project on the list, but it’s important that your stakeholders see their priorities clearly reflected in your budget; projects are the best way to do this.

If you’ve successfully pre-sold your budget and partnered with business-unit leaders to define IT initiatives, your stakeholders should already be very familiar with the project summaries you put in front of them in your presentation.

5.1b Select your transitional past-to-future content

30 minutes

  1. Open your copy of the IT Cost Forecasting and Budgeting Workbook.
  2. From Tabs 5, “Project CapEx Forecast” and 7, “Proposed Budget Analysis”, select the visual outputs (graphs and lists) you plan to include in the transitional section of your presentation. Consider the following when determining what to include or exclude:
    1. Shift from CapEx to OpEx: If this has been a point of contention or confusion with your CFO in the past, or if your organization has actively committed to greater cloud or outsourcing intensity, you’ll want to show this year-to-year shift in expenditure type.
    2. Strategic priorities: Profile major capital projects that reflect stakeholder priorities. If your audience is already very familiar with these projects, you may be able to skip detailed profiles and simply list them.
    3. Your time allowance. Plan for a maximum of 10 minutes for every half hour of total presentation time.
  3. Note what you plan to include in your presentation and set aside.

Download the IT Cost Forecasting and Budgeting Workbook

InputOutput
  • Data and graphs from the completed IT Cost Forecasting and Budgeting Workbook
  • Selected content and visuals for the past-to-future transitional section of the IT Budget Executive Presentation
MaterialsParticipants
  • Whiteboard/flip charts
  • Head of IT
  • IT Financial Lead
  • Other IT Management

Finally, carefully select detailed drill-downs that add clarity and depth to your proposed budget

The graphs you select here will be specific to your audience and any particular message you need to send.

This detailed phase of your presentation is important because it allows you to:

  1. Highlight specific areas of IT expenditure that often get buried under generalities.
  2. View your proposed budget from different perspectives that are most meaningful to your audience, such as traditional workforce vs. vendor allocations, expenditure by IT service, business-unit consumption, and the allocation of funds to innovation and growth versus daily IT operations.
  3. Get stakeholder attention. For example, laying out exactly how much money will be spent next year in support of the Sales Department compared to other units will get the VP of Sales’ attention…and everyone else’s, for that matter. This kind of transparency is invaluable for enabling meaningful conversations and thoughtful decision-making about IT spend.

Target timeframe for presentation: 7 minutes, but this phase of the presentation may naturally segue into the final Q&A.

Key objectives: Transparency, dialogue, buy-in.

Potential content for section:

  • Allocation across workforce vs. vendors
  • Top vendors by expenditure
  • Allocation across on-premises vs. cloud
  • Allocation across core IT services
  • Allocation across core business units
  • Allocation across business focus area

“A budget is a quantified version of
your service-level agreements.”

– Darin Stahl, Distinguished Analysis & Research Fellow,
Info-Tech Research Group,

Start with the expense view details

See Tab 8, “Proposed Budget Analysis” in your IT Cost Forecasting and Budgeting Workbook for these outputs.

Proposed budget: Workforce and vendors by expenditure type

Graph

Mandatory: This is the traditional CFO’s view, so definitely show it. The compelling twist here is showing it by expenditure type, i.e. non-project OpEx, non-project CapEx, and project CapEx.

Proposed budget: Cloud vs. on-premises vendor expenditure

Graph

Optional: If this is a point of contention or if an active transition to cloud solutions is underway, then show it.

Top vendors

Graph

Recommended: As with last year’s actuals, showing who the top vendors are slated to be next year speaks volumes to stakeholders about exactly where much of their money is going.

If you have a diverse audience with diverse interests, be very selective – you don’t want to bore them with things they don’t care about.

The image contains screenshots from Tab 8 of the IT Cost Forecasting and Budgeting Workbook.

Offer choice details on the other views

See Tab 8, “Proposed Budget Analysis” in your IT Cost Forecasting and Budgeting Workbook for these outputs.

Proposed budget: IT services by expenditure type

Graph

Optional: Business unit leaders will be most interested in the application services. Proposed expenditure on security and data and BI services may be of particular interest given business priorities. Don’t linger on infrastructure spend unless chargeback is in play.

Proposed budget: Business units by expenditure type

Graph

Optional: The purpose of this data is to show varying business units where they stand in terms of consumption. It may be more appropriate to show this graph in a one-on-one meeting or other context.

Proposed budget: Business focus by expenditure type

Graph

Optional: The CEO will care most about this data. If they’re not in the room, then consider bypassing it and discuss it separately with the CFO.

Inclusion of these graphs really depends on the makeup of your audience. It’s a good decision to show all of them to your CFO at some point before the formal presentation. Consider getting their advice on what to include and exclude.

The image contains screenshots from Tab 8 of the IT Cost Forecasting and Budgeting Workbook.

5.1c Select next year’s expenditure sub-category details

30 minutes

  1. Open your copy of the IT Cost Forecasting and Budgeting Workbook.
  2. From Tab 8, “Proposed Budget Analysis,” select the visual outputs (graphs) you plan to include in the targeted expenditure sub-category details section of your presentation. Consider the following when determining what to include or exclude:
    1. The presence of important fence-sitters. If there are key individuals who require more convincing, this is where you show them the reality of what it costs to deliver their most business-critical IT services to them.
    2. The degree to which you’ve already gone over the numbers previously with your audience. Again, if you’ve done your pre-selling, this data may be old news and not worth going over again.
    3. Your time allowance. Plan for a maximum of seven minutes for every half hour of total presentation time.
  3. Note what you plan to include in your presentation and set aside.

Download the IT Cost Forecasting and Budgeting Workbook

InputOutput
  • Data and graphs from the completed IT Cost Forecasting and Budgeting Workbook
  • Selected content and visuals for the expenditure category details section of the IT Budget Executive Presentation
MaterialsParticipants
  • Whiteboard/flip charts
  • Head of IT
  • IT Financial Lead
  • Other IT Management

Finalize your line-up and put your selected content into a presentation template

This step is about nailing down the horizontal logic of the story you want to tell. Start by ordering and loading the visualizations of your budget data.

Download Info-Tech’s IT Budget Executive Presentation Template

The image contains a screenshot of the IT Budget Executive Presentation Template.

If you prefer, use your own internal presentation standard template instead and Info-Tech’s template as a structural guide.

Regardless of the template you use, Info-Tech recommends the following structure:

  1. Summary: An overview of your decision-making assumptions, initial targets given the business context, and the total proposed IT budget amount.
  2. Retrospective: An overview of previous years’ performance, with a specific focus on last fiscal year.
  3. Proposed budget overview: A high-level view of the proposed budget for next fiscal year in the context of last year’s performance (i.e. the bridge from past to future), including alternative scenarios considered and capital projects on the roster.
  4. Proposed budget details by category: Detailed views of the proposed budget by expense type, IT service, business unit, and business focus category.
  5. Next steps: Include question-and-answer and itemization of your next actions through to submitting your final budget to the CFO.

Draft the commentary that describes and highlights your data’s key messages

This is where the rationales that you perfected earlier come into play.

Leave the details for the speaker’s notes.
Remember that this is an executive presentation. Use tags, pointers, and very brief sentences in the body of the presentation itself. Avoid walls of text. You want your audience to be listening to your words, not reading a slide.

Speak to everything that represents an increase or decrease of more than 5% or that simply looks odd.
Being transparent is essential. Don’t hide anything. Acknowledge the elephant in the room before your audience does to quickly stop suspicious or doubtful thoughts

Identify causes and rationales.
This is why your numbers are as they are. However, if you’re not 100% sure what all driving factors are, don’t make them up. Also, if the line between cause and effect isn’t straight, craft in advance a very simple way of explaining it that you can offer whenever needed.

Be neutral and objective in your language.
You need to park strong feelings at the door. You’re presenting rational facts and thoroughly vetted recommendations. The best defense is not to be defensive, or even offensive for that matter. You don’t need to argue, plead, or apologize – let your information speak for itself and allow the audience to arrive at their own logical conclusions.

Re-emphasize your core themes to create connections.
If a single strategic project is driving cost increases across multiple cost categories, point it out multiple times if needed to reinforce its importance. If an increase in one area is made possible by a significant offset in another, say so to demonstrate your ongoing commitment to efficiencies. If a single event from last year will continue having cost impacts on several IT services next year, spell this out.

5.2 Develop an executive presentation

Duration: 2 hours

  1. Download the IT Budget Executive Presentation PowerPoint template.
  2. Open your working version of the IT Cost Forecasting and Budgeting Workbook and copy and paste your selected graphs and tables into the template. Note: Pasting as an image will preserve graph formatting.
  3. Incorporate observations and insights about your proposed budget and other analysis into the template where indicated.
  4. Conduct an internal review of the final presentation to ensure it includes all the elements you need and is error-free.

Note: Refer to your organization’s standards and norms for executive-level presentations and either adapt the Info-Tech template accordingly or use your own.

Download the IT Budget Executive Presentation template

Input Output
  • Tabular and graphical data outputs in the IT Cost Forecasting and Budgeting Workbook
  • Interpretive commentary based on your analysis
  • Executive presentation summarizing your proposed IT budget
Materials Participants
  • IT Cost Forecasting and Budgeting Workbook
  • IT Budget Executive Presentation template
  • CIO/IT Directors
  • IT Financial Lead
  • Other IT Management

Now it’s time to present your proposed IT budget for next fiscal year

If you’ve done your homework and pre-sold your budget, the presentation itself should be a mere formality with no surprises for anyone, including you.

Some final advice on presenting your proposed budget…

Partner up

If something big in your budget is an initiative that’s for a specific business unit, let that business unit’s leader be the face of it and have IT play the role of supporting partner.

Use your champions

Let your advocates know in advance that you’d appreciate hearing their voice during the presentation if you encounter any pushback, or just to reinforce your main messages.

Focus on the CFO

The CFO is the most important stakeholder in the room at the end of the day, even more than the CEO in some cases. Their interests should take priority if you’re pressed for time.

Avoid judgment

Let the numbers speak for themselves. Do point out highlights and areas of interest but hold off on offering emotion-driven opinions. Let your audience draw their own conclusions.

Solicit questions

You do want dialogue. However, keep your answers short and to the point. What does come up in discussion is a good indication of where you’ll need to spend more time in the future.

The only other thing that can boost your chances is if you’re lucky enough to be scheduled to present between 10:00 and 11:00 on a Thursday morning when people are most agreeable. Beyond that, apply the standard rules of good presentations to optimize your success.

Your presentation is done – now re-focus on budget finalization and submission

This final stage tends to be very administrative. Follow the rules and get it done.

  • Incorporate feedback: Follow up on comments from your first presentation and reflect them in your budget if appropriate. This may include:
    • Having follow-up conversations with stakeholders.
    • Further clarifying the ROI projections or business benefits.
    • Adjusting proposed expenditure amounts based on new information or a shift in priorities.
    • Adding details or increasing granularity around specific issues of interest.
  • Trim: Almost every business unit leader will need to make cuts to their initial budget proposal. After all, the CFO has a finite pool of money to allocate. If all’s gone well, it may only be a few percent. Resurrect your less-costly alternative scenario and selectively apply the options you laid out there. Focus on downsizing or deferring capital projects if possible. If you must trim OpEx, remind the CFO about any service-level adjustments that will need to happen to make the less expensive alternatives work.
  • Re-present: It’s not unusual to have to present your budget one more time after you’ve made your adjustments. In some organizations, the first presentation is to an internal executive group while the second one is to a governing board. The same rules apply to this second presentation as to your first one.
  • Submit: Slot your final budget into the list of accounts prescribed in the budget template provided by Finance. These templates often don’t align with IT’s budget categories, but you’ll have to make do.

Phase recap: Create and deliver your presentation

You’ve reached the end of the budget creation and approval process. Now you can refocus on using your budget as a living governance tool.

This phase focused on developing your final proposed budget presentation for delivery to your various stakeholders. Here, you:

  • Planned your final content. You selected the data and visuals to include and highlight.
  • Built your presentation. You pulled everything together into a PowerPoint template and crafted commentary to tell a cohesive IT budget story.
  • Presented to stakeholders. You delivered your proposed IT budget and solicited their comments and feedback.
  • Made final adjustments and submitted your budget. You applied final tweaks, deconstructed your budget to fit Finance’s template, and submitted it for entry into Finance’s system.

“Everyone understands that there’s never enough money. The challenge is prioritizing the right work and funding it.”

– Trisha Goya, Director, IT Governance & Administration, Hawaii Medical Service Association

Next Steps

“Keep that conversation going throughout the year so that at budgeting time no one is surprised…Make sure that you’re telling your story all year long and keep track of that story.”

– Angela Hintz, VP of PMO & Integrated Services,
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Louisiana

This final section will provide you with:

  • An overall summary of accomplishment.
  • Recommended next steps.
  • A list of contributors to this research.
  • Some related Info-Tech resources.

Summary of Accomplishment

You’ve successfully created a transparent IT budget and gotten it approved.

By following the phases and steps in this blueprint, you have:

  1. Learned more about what an IT budget does and what it means to your key stakeholders.
  2. Assembled your budgeting team and critical data needed for forecasting and budgeting, as well as set expenditure goals for next fiscal year, and metrics for improving the budgeting process overall.
  3. Forecasted your project and non-project CapEx and OpEx for next fiscal year and beyond.
  4. Fine-tuned your proposed expenditure rationales.
  5. Crafted and delivered an executive presentation and got your budget approved.

What’s next?

Use your approved budget as an ongoing IT financial management governance tool and track your budget process improvement metrics.

If you would like additional support, have our analysts guide you through an Info-Tech full-service engagement or Guided Implementation.

Contact your account representative for more information.

1-888-670-8889

Research Contributors and Experts

Monica Braun

Research Director, ITFM Practice

Info-Tech Research Group

Carol Carr

Technical Counselor (Finance)

Info-Tech Research Group

Larry Clark

Executive Counselor

Info-Tech Research Group

Duane Cooney

Executive Counselor

Info-Tech Research Group

Lynn Fyhrlund

Former Chief Information Officer

Milwaukee County

Jay Gnuse

Information Technology Director

Chief Industries

Trisha Goya

Director, IS Client Services

Hawaii Medical Service Association

Angela Hintz

VP of PMO & Integrated Services

Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Louisiana

Rick Hopfer

Chief Information Officer

Hawaii Medical Service Association

Theresa Hughes

Executive Counselor

Info-Tech Research Group

Research Contributors and Experts

Dave Kish

Practice Lead, IT Financial Management Practice

Info-Tech Research Group

Matt Johnson

IT Director Governance and Business Solutions

Milwaukee County

Titus Moore

Executive Counselor

Info-Tech Research Group

Angie Reynolds

Principal Research Director, IT Financial Management Practice

Info-Tech Research Group

Mark Roman

Managing Partner, Executive Services

Info-Tech Research Group

Darin Stahl

Distinguished Analyst & Research Fellow

Info-Tech Research Group

Miguel Suarez

Head of Technology

Seguros Monterrey New York Life

Kristen Thurber

IT Director, Office of the CIO

Donaldson Company

Related Info-Tech Research & Services

Achieve IT Spend & Staffing Transparency

  • IT spend has increased in volume and complexity, but how IT spend decisions are made has not kept pace.
  • Lay a foundation for meaningful conversations and informed decision making around IT spend by transparently mapping exactly where IT funds are really going.

IT Spend & Staffing Benchmarking Service

  • Is a do-it-yourself approach to achieving spend transparency too onerous? Let Info-Tech do the heavy lifting for you.
  • Using Info-Tech’s ITFM Cost Model, our analysts will map your IT expenditure to four different stakeholder views – CFO Expense View, CIO Service View, CXO Business View, and CEO Innovation View – so that you clearly show where expenditure is going in terms that stakeholders can relate to and better demonstrate IT’s value to the business.
  • Get a full report that shows how your spend is allocated plus benchmarks that compare your results to those of your industry peers.

Build Your IT Cost Optimization Roadmap

  • Cost optimization is usually thought about in terms of cuts, when it’s really about optimizing IT’s cost-to-value ratio.
  • Develop a cost-optimization strategy based on your organization’s circumstances and timeline focused on four key areas of IT expenditure: assets, vendors, projects, and workforce.

Bibliography

“How Much Should a Company Spend on IT?” Techvera, no date. Accessed 3 Mar. 2023.
“State of the CIO Study 2023.” Foundry, 25 Jan. 2023. Accessed 3 Mar. 2023.
Aberdeen Strategy & Research. “The State of IT 2023.” Spiceworks. Ziff Davis, 2022. Accessed 28 Feb. 2023.
Ainsworth, Paul. “Responsibilities of the Modern CFO - A Function in Transition.” TopTal, LLC., no date. Accessed 15 Feb. 2023.
Balasaygun, Kaitlin. “For the first time in a long time, CFOs can say no to tech spending.” CNBC CFO Council, 19 Jan. 2023. Accessed 17 Feb. 2023.
Bashir, Ahmad. “Objectives of Capital Budgeting and factors affecting Capital Budget Decisions.” LinkedIn, 27 May 2017. Accessed 14 Apr. 2023.
Blackmon, Kris. “Building a Data-Driven Budget Pitch the C-Suite Can't Refuse.” NetSuite Brainyard, 21 Sep. 2021. Accessed 17 Feb. 2023
Butcher, Daniel. “CFO to CFO: Budgeting to Fund Strategic Plans.” Strategic Finance Magazine/Institute of Management Accountants, 1 Dec. 2021. Accessed 17 Feb. 2023
Gray, Patrick. “IT Budgeting: A Cheat Sheet.” TechRepublic, 29 Jul. 2020. Accessed 28 Feb. 2023.
Greenbaum, David. “Budget vs. Actuals: Budget Variance Analysis & Guide.” OnPlan, 15 Mar. 2022. Accessed 22 Mar. 2023.
Huber, Michael and Joan Rundle. “How to Budget for IT Like a CFO.” Huber & Associates, no date. Accessed 15 Feb. 2023.
Kinney, Tara. “Executing Your Department Budget Like a CFO.” Atomic Revenue, LLC., no date. Accessed 15 Feb. 2023.
Lafley, A.G. “What Only the CFO Can Do.” Harvard Business Review, May 2009. Accessed 15 Mar. 2009.
Moore, Peter D. “IN THE DIGITAL WORLD, IT should be run as a profit center, not a cost center.” Wild Oak Enterprise, 26 Feb. 2020. Accessed 3 Mar. 2023.
Nordmeyer, Bille. “What Factors Are Going to Influence Your Budgeting Decisions?” bizfluent, 8 May 2019. Accessed 14 Apr. 2023
Ryan, Vincent. “IT Spending and 2023 Budgets Under Close Scrutiny.” CFO, 5 Dec. 2022. Accessed 3 Mar. 2023.
Stackpole, Beth. “State of the CIO, 2022: Focus turns to IT fundamentals.” CIO Magazine, 21 Mar. 2022. Accessed 3 Mar. 2023.

Build your service map: What does your company do for your customers?

  • Large vertical image:
  • member rating overall impact: Large Impact
  • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
  • member rating average days saved: N/A

After three decades navigating the complexities of organizational resilience, one truth stands clearer than ever: you cannot truly protect what you do not deeply understand. And for any business, especially in today's dynamic landscape, what you do is ultimately about what you do for your customers. There is something that I see insufficiently matured or missing in many companies: building a comprehensive “service map.”

Think about it. We pour resources into product development, marketing, and sales, yet how often do we collectively pause to articulate, across all departments, exactly what services we provide to our customers? It sounds simple, doesn't it? Yet, the reality is typically a fragmented understanding, siloed information, and a distinct lack of a holistic view, except by a few key people.

Why is this clear view so critical? Because your customers don't interact with your internal departments; they interact with your services. They don't care about your organizational chart; they care about how seamlessly you meet their needs. Without a clear service map, you have blind spots. You miss opportunities for optimization, you introduce friction into customer journeys, and critically, you compromise your ability to recover when things go wrong. Resilience isn't just about bouncing back; it's about understanding what's truly essential to protect your customer relationships.

Let's make this real.


What services do banks offer? It’s far more than just “banking.” They provide:

  • Retail Banking: Current accounts, savings accounts, debit/credit cards, personal loans, mortgages.

  • Investment Services: Wealth management, brokerage, mutual funds, pension products.

  • Business Banking: Corporate loans, treasury services, payroll solutions, trade finance.

  • Digital Services: Online banking platforms, mobile apps, and payment gateways.

  • Advisory Services: Financial planning, retirement planning, and estate planning.

Let's hone in on an often complex offering: a pension savings product where you contribute monthly. This isn't just a “product” on a shelf; it's a living, breathing service with a distinct customer journey.

Imagine the customer journey for this:

  1. Customer Initiates Payment (or Automated Process Triggers): On the designated payment date, a SEPA Direct Debit instruction is initiated, pulling funds from the customer's linked bank account.

  2. Funds Transfer & Clearance: The funds travel through interbank networks, cleared and settled between the customer's bank and the financial institution’s holding accounts.

  3. Internal Reconciliation & Allocation: Upon receipt, the funds are reconciled against the customer's pension account number and allocated to their specific pension product.

  4. Investment Instruction: Based on the product's pre-defined investment strategy (e.g., a balanced fund, equity fund), an instruction is generated to purchase units in the underlying investments.

  5. Market Execution: The instruction is sent to the relevant trading desks or automated systems, which execute the purchase of shares, bonds, or other assets on the stock market at prevailing market prices.

  6. Confirmation & Update: Once the trade is settled, the customer's pension account is updated to reflect the new units purchased and the updated total value, often visible via an online portal or statement.


For every single step in this service, your organization needs robust capabilities to make these steps visible and resilient to all stakeholders who “work around that service.” This isn't just for IT; it's for compliance, operations, customer service, and even marketing.

Let's look at the same for a realtor company specializing in rental properties:

  • Service Map for property owners and landlords:

    • Property Listing & Marketing: Creating professional listings, photography, virtual tours, and advertising on various platforms (online portals, social media, and local networks).

    • Tenant Sourcing & Vetting: Conducting viewings, screening potential tenants (credit checks, employment verification, previous landlord references), and background checks.

    • Lease Agreement Management: Drafting, negotiating, and executing legally compliant rental contracts.

    • Property Maintenance & Repairs Coordination: Arranging routine maintenance, coordinating emergency repairs with vetted contractors, and overseeing work quality.

    • Property Inspections: Conducting periodic property inspections (move-in, routine, move-out) to ensure property condition and compliance with lease terms.

    • Compliance & Legal Guidance: Advising on landlord-tenant laws, health & safety regulations, and handling eviction processes if necessary.

    • Security Deposit Management: Collecting, holding, and returning security deposits in accordance with legal requirements.

  • Services for tenants:

    • Property Search & Matching: Assisting prospective tenants in finding suitable properties based on their needs and budget.

    • Viewing Scheduling: Arranging property viewings and providing access.

    • Application Processing: Guiding tenants through the application process and necessary documentation.

    • Lease Onboarding: Explaining lease terms, facilitating key handover, and conducting move-in inspections.

    • Maintenance Request Handling: A clear process for tenants to report maintenance issues and track resolution.

    • Emergency Support: Providing contact points and procedures for urgent property-related emergencies.

    • Lease Renewal & Move-out Support: Managing lease renewals, providing guidance on move-out procedures, and facilitating security deposit returns.

Many of these will require automated systems. The customer-facing ones even more so. You need to understand the customer journeys for each entry in your service map.

You need:

  • Comprehensive Monitoring & Alerting: Real-time visibility into every step of the journey, flagging anomalies or delays before they become customer-impacting issues. Build monitoring capabilities into the systems and build the operational capability to follow up on alerts and events. There are now products on the market that can do a lot of the heavy lifting for you. Be prepared to open your wallet. This is not cheap. I hear AI already rolling off the tongues: this is not cheap. For smaller service maps and customer journeys, consider using built-in tools and hiring a small team of people that can leverage the next points. For large institutions, let alone manufacturing, automation and continuous testing are key.

  • Centralized Knowledge Management: A single source of truth for service definitions, processes, dependencies, and known issues, accessible to everyone who needs it. No more tribal knowledge. For condensed setups, it can be as simple as a folder on a hard drive that contains your knowledge base articles (aka Word documents that explain the process, how it was set up, what you need to operate it etc.). Most businesses will use some form of knowledge management system that is a bit more sophisticated, perhaps even built-in to the IT Operations Management (ITOM) tooling. It's a shame it's called IT ops tooling, because you can equally use this for business process documentation. Just remember the last bullet below: DR and BCP. Your knowledge system is useless if you cannot get to it!   

  • Robust Development & Operations Processes: Seamless collaboration between development, operations, and business teams to make sure services are built, tested, deployed, and managed efficiently and reliably. It does not really matter if you want to use DevOps, or change/run, or scrum and squads, or anything in between. Pick what works in your culture. Also, it is not one-size-fits-all. Some systems are core and require a more strict regimen; others must be able to turn on a dime. But whatever you use: keep your service and the customer journey through it front and center. Build it so that you have clearly separated “stations” where something is done to fulfill the system. Make the mental analogy with a factory. It will keep each station atomic, so that when the time comes to make changes, you can do so without having to re-invent large parts of the value delivery chain. 

  • End-to-End Security Protocols: Protect sensitive customer data and financial transactions at every touchpoint throughout the journey. I mean, duh. You must. This is non-negotiable. This includes your backups. Large or small company, you must maintain backups. Use the 321 method: 3 copies of your data and setups on 2 different platforms or data storage carriers and 1 offsite. Your backups should include at least 1 immutable copy. That is a copy that cannot be altered. Large firms partner with their hosting companies to include that in the service offering; small companies have cheap options. I use 2 separate backup providers (total cost around €100/month at the time of writing in 2025) and my own disconnected storage carriers. I even use a backup provider and disconnected storage for my family's data (around €25/month).

  • Effective Disaster Recovery (DR) & Business Continuity Planning (BCP) Capabilities: Understanding critical service components, their recovery time objectives (RTOs), and recovery point objectives (RPOs) to ensure rapid restoration of service even after major disruptions. This isn't a theoretical exercise; it needs to be tested and proven. Your expectations also need to be realistic. 

There are more elements to consider when building your service map and the customer journeys when it comes to resilience. Things like performance metrics, scalability, peak usage management, and so on. McKinsey wrote years ago, design for the storm, not the sunny days. That is right, but keep the design within the commercial service parameters. It is equally bad to overbuild to a $5 million system, if your expected revenue is less than $100,000 a year, than it is to use a $10,000 system to support a $5 million revenue stream. (I remember the Excel sheet from hell that actually supported a macro-economist at a large brokerage.) 

Start mapping your services today. Start with what you feel are the most critical ones. You'll uncover inefficiencies, mitigate risks, and strengthen the very foundation of your customer relationships. You may even save some money.

Applications Priorities 2023

  • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}186|cart{/j2store}
  • member rating overall impact: N/A
  • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
  • member rating average days saved: N/A
  • Parent Category Name: Architecture & Strategy
  • Parent Category Link: /architecture-and-strategy
  • Economic, social, and regulatory conditions have changed livelihoods, businesses, and marketplaces. Modern tools and technologies have acted as lifelines by minimizing operating and delivery costs, and in the process, establishing a strong foundation for growth and maturity.
  • These tools and technologies must meet the top business goals of CXOs: ensure service continuity, improve customer experience, and make data-driven decisions.
  • While today’s business applications are good and well received, there is still room for improvement. The average business application satisfaction score among IT leadership was 72% (n=1582, CIO Business Vision).

Our Advice

Critical Insight

  • Applications are critical components in any business strategic plan. They can directly influence an organization’s internal and external brand and reputation, such as their uniqueness, competitiveness and innovativeness in the industry
  • Business leaders are continuously looking for innovative ways to better position their application portfolio to satisfy their goals and objectives, i.e., application priorities. Given the scope and costs often involved, these priorities must be carefully crafted to clearly state achievable business outcomes that satisfies the different needs very different customers, stakeholders, and users.
  • Unfortunately, expectations on your applications team have increased while the gap between how stakeholders and applications teams perceive effectiveness remains wide. This points to a need to clarify the requirements to deliver valuable and quality applications and address the pressures challenging your teams.

Impact and Result

Learn and explore the technology and practice initiatives in this report to determine which initiatives should be prioritized in your application strategy and align to your business organizational objectives:

  • Optimize the effectiveness of the IT organization.
  • Boost the productivity of the enterprise.
  • Enable business growth through technology.

Applications Priorities 2023 Research & Tools

Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

1. Applications Priorities Report 2023 – A report that introduces and describes five opportunities to prioritize in your 2023 application strategy.

In this report, we explore five priorities for emerging and leading-edge technologies and practices that can improve on capabilities needed to meet the ambitions of your organization.

  • Applications Priorities 2023 Report

Infographic

Further reading

Applications Priorities 2023

Applications are the engine of the business: keep them relevant and modern

What we are facing today is transforming the ways in which we work, live, and relate to one another. Applications teams and portfolios MUST change to meet this reality.

Economic, social, and regulatory conditions have changed livelihoods, businesses, and marketplaces. Modern tools and technologies have acted as lifelines by minimizing operating and delivery costs, and in the process, establishing a strong foundation for growth and maturity.

As organizations continue to strengthen business continuity, disaster recovery, and system resilience, activities to simply "keep the lights on" are not enough. Be pragmatic in the prioritization and planning of your applications initiatives, and use your technologies as a foundation for your growth.

Your applications must meet the top business goals of your CXOs

  • Ensure service continuity
  • Improve customer experience
  • Make data-driven decisions
  • Maximize stakeholder value
  • Manage risk

Source: CEO-CIO Alignment Diagnostics, August 2021 to July 2022, n=568.

Select and align your applications priorities to your business goals and objectives

Applications are critical components in any business strategic plan. They can directly influence an organization's internal and external brand and reputation, such as their:

  • Uniqueness, competitiveness, and innovativeness in the industry.
  • Ability to be dynamic, flexible, and responsive to changing expectations, business conditions, and technologies.

Therefore, business leaders are continuously looking for innovative ways to better position their application portfolios to satisfy their goals and objectives, i.e. applications priorities. Given the scope and costs often involved, these priorities must be carefully crafted to clearly state achievable business outcomes that satisfy
the different needs of very different customers, stakeholders, and users.

Today's business applications are good but leave room for improvement

72%
Average business application satisfaction score among IT leadership in 1582 organizations.

Source: CIO Business Vision, August 2021 to July 2022, N=190.

Five Applications Priorities for 2023

In this report, we explore five priorities for emerging and leading-edge technologies and practices that can improve on capabilities needed to meet the Ambitions of your organization.

this is an image of the Five Applications Priorities for which will be addressed in this blueprint.

Strengthen your foundations to better support your applications priorities

These key capabilities are imperative to the success of your applications strategy.

KPI and Metrics

Easily attainable and insightful measurements to gauge the progress of meeting strategic objectives and goals (KPIs), and the performance of individual teams, practices and processes (metrics).

BUSINESS ALIGNMENT

Gain an accurate understanding and interpretation of stakeholder, end-user, and customer expectations and priorities. These define the success of business products and services considering the priorities of individual business units and teams.

EFFICIENT DELIVERY & SUPPORT PRACTICE

Software delivery and support roles, processes, and tools are collaborative, well equipped and resourced, and optimized to meet changing stakeholder expectations.

Data Management & Governance

Ensuring data is continuously reliable and trustworthy. Data structure and integrations are defined, governed, and monitored.

Product & Service Ownership

Complete inventory and rationalization of the product and service portfolio, prioritized backlogs, roadmaps, and clear product and service ownership with good governance. This helps ensure this portfolio is optimized to meet its goals and objectives.

Strengthen your foundations to better support your applications priorities (cont'd)

These key capabilities are imperative to the success of your applications strategy.

Organizational Change Management

Manage the adoption of new and modified processes and technologies considering reputational, human, and operational concerns.

IT Operational Management

Continuous monitoring and upkeep of products and services to assure business continuity, and system reliability, robustness and disaster recovery.

Architectural Framework

A set of principles and standards that guides the consistent, sustainable and scalable growth of enterprise technologies. Changes to the architecture are made in collaboration with affected parties, such as security and infrastructure.

Application Security

The measures, controls, and tactics at the application layer that prevent vulnerabilities against external and internal threats and ensure compliance to industry and regulatory security frameworks and standards.

There are many factors that can stand in your team's way

Expectations on your applications team have increased, while the gap between how stakeholders and applications teams perceive effectiveness remains wide. This points to a need to clarify the requirements to deliver valuable and quality applications and address the pressures challenging your teams.

  1. Attracting and retaining talent
  2. Maximizing the return on technology
  3. Confidently shifting to digital
  4. Addressing competing priorities
  5. Fostering a collaborative culture
  6. Creating high-throughput teams

CIOs agree that at least some improvement is needed across key IT activities

A bar graph is depicted which shows the proportion of CIOs who believe that some, or significant improvement is necessary for the following categories: Measure IT Project Success; Align IT Budget; Align IT Project Approval Process; Measure Stakeholder Satisfaction With IT; Define and Align IT Strategy; Understand Business Goals

Source: CEO-CIO Alignment Diagnostics, August 2021 to July 2022, n=568.

Pressure Point 1:
Attracting and Retaining Talent

Recent environmental pressures impacted traditional working arrangements and showed more workplace flexibility is often possible. At the same time, many employees' expectations about how, when, and where they choose to work have also evolved. Recruitment and retention are reflections of different sides of the same employee value proposition coin. Organizations that fail to reinvent their approach to attracting and retaining talent by focusing on candidate and employee experience risk turnover, vacancies, and lost opportunities that can negatively impact the bottom line.

Address the underlying challenges

  • Lack of employee empowerment and few opportunities for learning and development.
  • Poor coworker and manager relationships.
  • Compensation and benefits are inadequate to maintain desired quality of life.
  • Unproductive work environment and conflicting balance of work and life.
  • Unsatisfactory employee experience, including lack of employee recognition
    and transparency of organizational change.

While workplace flexibility comes with many benefits, longer work hours jeopardize wellbeing.
62% of organizations reported increased working hours, while 80% reported an increase in flexibility.
Source: McLean & Company, 2022; n=394.

Be strategic in how you fill and train key IT skills and capabilities

  • Cybersecurity
  • Big Data/Analytics
  • Technical Architecture
  • DevOps
  • Development
  • Cloud

Source: Harvey Nash Group, 2021; n=2120.

Pressure Point 2:
Maximizing the Return of Technology

Recent environmental pressures impacted traditional working arrangements and showed more workplace flexibility is often possible. At the same time, many employees' expectations about how, when, and where they choose to work have also evolved. Recruitment and retention are reflections of different sides of the same employee value proposition coin. Organizations that fail to reinvent their approach to attracting and retaining talent by focusing on candidate and employee experience risk turnover, vacancies, and lost opportunities that can negatively impact the bottom line.

Address the underlying challenges

  • Inability to analyze, propose, justify, and communicate modernization solutions in language the stakeholders understand and in a way that shows they clearly support business priorities and KPIs and mitigate risks.
  • Little interest in documenting and rationalizing products and services through business-IT collaboration.
  • Lack of internal knowledge of the system and loss of vendor support.
  • Undefined, siloed product and service ownership and governance, preventing solutions from working together to collectively deliver more value.
  • Little stakeholder appetite to invest in activities beyond "keeping the lights on."

Only 64% of applications were identified as effective by end users.
Effective applications are identified as at least highly important and have high feature and usability satisfaction.
Source: Application Portfolio Assessment, August 2021 to July 2022; N=315.

"Regardless of the many definitions of modernization floating around, the one characteristic that we should be striving for is to ensure our applications do an outstanding job of supporting the users and the business in the most effective and efficient manner possible."
Source: looksoftware.

Pressure Point 3:
Confidently Shifting to Digital

"Going digital" reshapes how the business operates and drives value by optimizing how digital and traditional technologies and tactics work together. This shift often presents significant business and technical risks to business processes, enterprise data, applications, and systems which stakeholders and teams are not aware of or prepared to accommodate.

Address the underlying challenges

  • Differing perspectives on digital can lead to disjointed transformation initiatives, oversold benefits, and a lack of synergy among digital technologies and processes.
  • Organizations have difficulty adapting to new technologies or rethinking current business models, processes, and ways of working because of the potential human, ethical, and reputational impacts and restrictions from legacy systems.
  • Management lacks a framework to evaluate how their organization manages and governs business value delivery.
  • IT is not equipped or resourced to address these rapidly changing business, customer, and technology needs.
  • The wrong tools and technologies were chosen to support the shift to digital.

The shift to digital processes is starting, but slowly.
62% of respondents indicated that 1-20% of their processes were digitized during the past year.
Source: Tech Trends and Priorities 2023; N=500

Resistance to change and time/budget constraints are top barriers preventing companies from modernizing their applications.
Source: Konveyor, 2022; n=600.

Pressure Point 4:
Addressing Competing Priorities

Enterprise products and services are not used, operated, or branded in isolation. The various parties involved may have competing priorities, which often leads to disagreements on when certain business and technology changes should be made and how resources, budget, and other assets should be allocated. Without a broader product vision, portfolio vision, and roadmap, the various dependent or related products and services will not deliver the same level of value as if they were managed collectively.

Address the underlying challenges

  • Undefined product and service ownership and governance, including escalation procedures when consensus cannot be reached.
  • Lack of a unified and grounded set of value and quality definitions, guiding principles, prioritization standards, and broad visibility across portfolios, business capabilities, and business functions.
  • Distrust between business units and IT teams, which leads to the scaling of unmanaged applications and fragmented changes and projects.
  • Decisions are based on opinions and experiences without supporting data.

55% of CXOs stated some improvement is necessary in activities to understand business goals.
Source: CEO-CIO Alignment Diagnostics, August 2021 to July 2022; n=568.

CXOs are moderately satisfied with IT's performance as a business partner (average score of 69% among all CXOs). This sentiment is similarly felt among CIOs (64%).
Source: CEO-CIO Alignment Diagnostics, August 2021 to July 2022; n=568.

Pressure Point 5:
Fostering a Collaborative Culture

Culture impacts business results, including bottom-line revenue and productivity metrics. Leaders appreciate the impact culture can have on applications initiatives and wish to leverage this. How culture translates from an abstract concept to something that is measurable and actionable is not straightforward. Executives need to clarify how the desired culture will help achieve their applications strategy and need to focus on the items that will have the most impact.

Address the underlying challenges

  • Broad changes do not consider the unique subcultures, personalities, and behaviors of the various teams and individuals in the organization.
  • Leaders mandate cultural changes without alleviating critical barriers and do not embody the principles of the target state.
  • Bureaucracy and politics restrict changes and encourage the status quo.
  • Industry standards, technologies, and frameworks do not support or cannot be tailored to fit the desired culture.
  • Some teams are deliberately excluded from the scoping, planning, and execution of key product and service delivery and management activities.

Agile does not solve team culture challenges.
43% of organizations cited organizational culture as a significant barrier to adopting and scaling Agile practices.
Source: Digital.ai, 2021.

"Providing a great employee experience" as the second priority (after recruiting) highlights the emphasis organizations are placing on helping employees adjust after having been forced to change the way work gets done.
Source: McLean & Company, 2022; N=826.

Use your applications priorities to help address your pressure points

Success can be dependent on your ability to navigate around or alleviate your pressure points. Design and market your applications priorities to bring attention to your pressure points and position them as key risk factors to their success.

Applications Priorities
Digital Experience (DX) Intelligent Automation Proactive Application Management Multisource Systems Digital Organization as a Platform
Attracting and Retaining Talent Enhance the employee experience Be transparent and support role changes Shift focus from maintenance to innovation Enable business-managed applications Promote and showcase achievements and successes
Maximizing the Return on Technology Modernize or extend the use of existing investments Automate applications across multiple business functions Improve the reliability of mission-critical applications Enhance the functionality of existing applications Increase visibility of underused applications
Confidently Shifting to Digital Prioritize DX in your shift to digital Select the capabilities that will benefit most from automation Prepare applications to support digital tools and technologies Use best-of-breed tools to meet specific digital needs Bring all applications up to a common digital standard
Addressing Competing Priorities Ground your digital vision, goals, and objectives Recognize and evaluate the architectural impact Rationalize the health of the applications Agree on a common philosophy on system composition Map to a holistic platform vision, goals, and objectives
Fostering a Collaborative Culture Involve all perspectives in defining and delivering DX Involve the end user in the delivery and testing of the automated process Include the technical perspective in the viability of future applications plans Discuss how applications can work together better in an ecosystem Ensure the platform is configured to meet the individual needs of the users
Creating High-Throughput Teams Establish delivery principles centered on DX Remove manual, error-prone, and mundane tasks Simplify applications to ease delivery and maintenance Alleviate delivery bottlenecks and issues Abstract the enterprise system to expedite delivery

Digital Experience (DX)

PRIORITY 1

  • Deliver Valuable User, Customer, Employee, and Brand Experiences

Delivering valuable digital experiences requires the adoption of good management, governance, and operational practices to accommodate stakeholder, employee, customer, and end-user expectations of digital experiences (e.g. product management, automation, and iterative delivery). Technologies are chosen based on what best enables, delivers, and supports these expectations.

Introduction

Digital transformation is not just about new tools and technologies. It is also about delivering a valuable digital experience

What is digital experience (DX)?

Digital experience (DX) refers to the interaction between a user and an organization through digital products and services. Digital products and services are tools, systems, devices, and resources that gather, store, and process data; are continuously modernized; and embody eight key attributes that are described on the following slide. DX is broken down into four distinct perspectives*:

  • Customer Experience – The immediate perceptions of transactions and interactions experienced through a customer's journey in the use of the organization's digital
    products and services.
  • End-User Experience – Users' emotions, beliefs, and physical and psychological responses
    that occur before, during, or after interacting with a digital product or service.
  • Brand Experience – The broader perceptions, emotions, thoughts, feelings and actions the public associate with the organization's brand and reputation or its products and services. Brand experience evolves over time as customers continuously engage with the brand.
  • Employee Experience – The satisfaction and experience of an employee through their journey with the organization, from recruitment and hiring to their departure. How an employee embodies and promotes the organization brand and culture can affect their performance, trust, respect, and drive to innovate and optimize.
Digital Products and Services
Customer Experience Brand Experience Employee Experience End-User Experience

Digital products and services have a common set of attributes

Digital transformation is not just about new tools and technologies. It is also about delivering a valuable digital experience

  • Digital products and services must keep pace with changing business and end-user needs as well as tightly supporting your maturing business model with continuous modernization. Focus your continuous modernization on the key characteristics that drive business value.
  • Fit for purpose: Functionalities are designed and implemented for the purpose of satisfying the end user's needs and solving their problems.
  • User-centric: End users see the product as rewarding, engaging, intuitive, and emotionally satisfying. They want to come back to it.
  • Adaptable: The product can be quickly tailored to meet changing end-user and technology needs with reusable and customizable components.
  • Accessible: The product is available on demand and on the end user's preferred interface.
    End users have a seamless experience across all devices.
  • Private and secured: The end user's activity and data are protected from unauthorized access.
  • Informative and insightful: The product delivers consumable, accurate, and trustworthy real-time data that is important to the end user.
  • Seamless application connection: The product facilitates direct interactions with one or more other products through an uninterrupted user experience.
  • Relationship and network building: The product enables and promotes the connection and interaction of people.

The Business Value cycle of continuous modernization.

Signals

DX is critical for business growth and maturity, but the organization may not be ready

A good DX has become a key differentiator that gives organizations an advantage over their competition and peers. Shifts in working environments; employee, customer, and stakeholder expectations; and the advancements in modern technologies have raised the importance of adopting and transitioning to digital processes and tools to stay relevant and responsive to changing business and technology conditions.

Applications teams are critical to ensuring the successful delivery and operation of these digital processes and tools. However, they are often under-resourced and challenged to meet their DX goals.

  • 7% of both business and IT respondents think IT has the resources needed to keep up with digital transformation initiatives and meet deadlines (Cyara, 2021).
  • 43% of respondents said that the core barrier to digital transformation is a lack of skilled resources (Creatio, 2021).
A circle graph is shown with 91% of the circle coloured in dark blue, with the number 91% in the centre.

of organizations stated that at least 1% of processes were shifted from being manually completed to digitally completed in the last year. 29% of organizations stated at least 21% were shifted.

Source: Tech Trends and Priorities 2023; N=500.

A circle graph is shown with 98% of the circle coloured in dark blue, with the number 98% in the centre.

of organizations recognized digital transformation is important for competitive advantage. 94% stated it is important to enhance customer experience, and 91% stated it will have a positive impact on revenue.

Source: Cyara, 2021.

Drivers

Brand and reputation

Customers are swayed by the innovations and advancements in digital technologies and expect your applications team to deliver and support them. Your leaders recognize the importance of these expectations and are integrating them into their business strategy and brand (how the organization presents itself to its customers, employees and the public). They hope that their actions will improve and shape the company's reputation (public perception of the company) as effective, customer-focused, and forward-thinking.

Worker productivity

As you evolve and adopt more complex tools and technology, your stakeholders will expect more from business units and IT teams. Unfortunately, teams employing manual processes and legacy systems will struggle to meet these expectations. Digital products and services promote the simplification of complex operations and applications and help the business and your teams better align operational practices with strategic goals and deliver valuable DX.

Organization modernization

Legacy processes, systems, and ways of working are no longer suitable for meeting the strategic digital objectives and DX needs stakeholders expect. They drive up operational costs without increased benefits, impede business growth and innovation, and consume scarce budgets that could be used for other priorities. Shifting to digital tools and technologies will bring these challenges to light and demonstrate how modernization is an integral part of DX success.

Benefits & Risks

Benefits

  • Flexibility & Satisfaction
  • Adoption
  • Reliability

Employees and customers can choose how they want to access, modify, and consume digital products and services. They can be tailored to meet the specific functional needs, behaviors, and habits of the end user.

The customer, end user, brand, and employee drive selection, design, and delivery of digital products and services. Even the most advanced technologies will fail if key roles do not see the value in their use.

Digital products and services are delivered with technical quality built into them, ensuring they meet the industry, regulatory, and company standards throughout their lifespan and in various conditions.

Risks

  • Legacy & Lore
  • Bureaucracy & Politics
  • Process Inefficiencies
  • No Quality Standards

Some stakeholders may not be willing to change due to their familiarity and comfort of business practices.

Competing and conflicting priorities of strategic products and services undermine digital transformation and broader modernization efforts.

Business processes are often burdened by wasteful activities. Digital products and services are only as valuable as the processes they support.

The performance and support of your digital products and services are hampered due to unmanageable technical debt because of a deliberate decision to bypass or omit quality good practices.

Address your pressure points to fully realize the benefits of this priority

Success can be dependent on your ability to address your pressure points.

Attracting and Retaining Talent

Enhance the employee experience.

Design the digital processes, tools, and technologies to meet the individual needs of the employee.

Maximizing the Return on Technology

Modernize or extend the use of existing investments.

Drive higher adoption of applications and higher user value and productivity by implementing digital capabilities to the applications that will gain the most.

Confidently Shifting to Digital

Prioritize DX in your shift to digital. Include DX as part of your definition of success.

Your products and services are not valuable if users, customers, and employees do not use them.

Addressing Competing Priorities

Ground your digital vision, goals, and objectives

Establish clear ownership of DX and digital products and services with a cross-functional prioritization framework.

Fostering a Collaborative Culture

Involve all perspectives in defining and delivering DX.

Maintain a committee of owners, stakeholders, and delivery teams to ensure consensus and discuss how to address cross-functional opportunities and risks.

Creating High-Throughput Teams

Establish delivery principles centered on DX.

Enforce guiding principles to streamline and simplify DX delivery, such as plug-and-play architecture and quality standards.

Recommendations

Build a digital business strategy

A digital business strategy clearly articulates the goals and ambitions of the business to adopt digital practices, tools, and technologies. This document:

  • Looks for ways to transform the business by identifying what technologies to embrace, what processes to automate, and what new business models to create.
  • Unifies digital possibilities with your customer experiences.
  • Establishes accountability with the executive leadership.
  • States the importance of cross-functional participation from senior management across the organization.

Related Research:

Learn, understand, and empathize with your users, employees, and customers

  • To create a better product, solution, or service, understanding those who use it, their needs, and their context is critical.
  • A great experience design practice can help you balance those goals so that they are in harmony with those of your users.
  • IT leaders must find ways to understand the needs of the business and develop empathy on a much deeper level. This empathy is the foundation for a thriving business partnership.

Related Research:

Recommendations

Center product and service delivery decisions and activities on DX and quality

User, customer, employee, and brand are integral perspectives on the software development lifecycle (SDLC) and the management and governance practices supporting digital products and services. It ensures quality standards and controls are consistently upheld while maintaining alignment with various needs and priorities. The goal is to come to a consensus on a universal definition and approach to embed quality and DX-thinking throughout the delivery process.

Related Research:

Instill collaborative delivery practices

Today's rapidly scaling and increasingly complex digital products and services create mounting pressure on delivery teams to release new features and changes quickly and with sufficient quality. This pressure is further compounded by the competing priorities of individual stakeholders and the nuances among different personas of digital products and services.

A collaborative delivery practice sets the activities, channels, and relationships needed to deliver a valuable and quality product or service with cross-functional awareness, accountability, and agreement.

Related Research:

Recommendations

Continuously monitor and modernize your digital products and services

Today's modern digital products and services are tomorrow's shelfware. They gradually lose their value, and the supporting technologies will become obsolete. Modernization is a continuous need.

Data-driven insights help decision makers decide which products and services to retire, upgrade, retrain on, or maintain to meet the demands of the business.

Enhancements focusing on critical business capabilities strengthen the case for investment and build trust with all stakeholders.

Related Research:

CASE STUDY
Mastercard in Asia

Focus on the customer journey

Chief Marketing Officer M.V. Rajamannar (Raja) wanted to change Mastercard's iconic "Priceless" ad campaign (with the slogan "There are some things money can't buy. For everything else there's Mastercard."). The main reasons were that the campaign relied on one-way communication and targeted end customers, even though Mastercard doesn't issue cards directly to customers; partner banks do. To drive the change in campaign, Raja and his team created a digital engine that leveraged digital and social media. Digital engine is a seven-step process based on insights gleaned from data and real-time optimization.

  1. Emotional spark: Using data to understand customers' passion points, Mastercard builds videos and creatives to ignite an emotional spark and give customers a reason to engage. For example, weeks before New Year's Eve, Mastercard produced a video with Hugh Jackman to encourage customers to submit a story about someone who deeply mattered to them. The authors of the winning story would be flown to reunite with those both distant and dear.
  2. Engagement: Mastercard targets the right audience with a spark video through social media to encourage customers to share their stories.
  3. Offers: To help its partner banks and merchants in driving their business, the company identifies the best offers to match consumers' interests. In the above campaign, Mastercard's Asia-Pacific team found that Singapore was a favorite destination for Indian customers, so they partnered with Singapore's Resorts World Sentosa with an attractive offer.
  4. Real-time optimization: Mastercard optimizes, in real time, a portfolio of several offers through A/B testing and other analysis.
  5. Amplification: Real-time testing provides confidence to Mastercard about the potential success of these offers and encourages its bank and merchant partners to co-market and co-fund these campaigns.
  6. Network effects: A few weeks after consumers submitted their stories about distant loved ones, Mastercard selected winners, produced videos of them surprising their friends and families, and used these videos in social media to encourage sharing.
  7. Incremental transactions: These programs translate into incremental business for banks who issue cards, for merchants where customers spend money, and for Mastercard, which gets a portion of every transaction.

Source: Harvard Business Review Press

CASE STUDY
Mastercard in Asia (cont'd)

Focus on the customer journey

  1. Emotional Spark
    Drives genuine personal stories
  2. Engagement
    Through Facebook
    and social media
  3. Offers
    From merchants
    and Mastercard assets
  4. Optimization
    Real-time testing of offers and themes
  5. Amplification
    Paid and organic programmatic buying
  6. Network Effects
    Sharing and
    mass engagement
  7. Incremental Transactions
    Win-win for all parties

CASE STUDY
Mastercard in Asia (cont'd)

The Mastercard case highlights important lessons on how to engage customers:

  • Have a broad message. Brands need to connect with consumers over how they live and spend their time. Organizations need to go beyond the brand or product message to become more relevant to consumers' lives. Dove soap was very successful in creating a conversation among consumers with its "Real Beauty" campaign, which focused not on the brand or even the product category, but on how women and society view beauty.
  • Shift from storytelling to story making. To break through the clutter of advertising, companies need to move from storytelling to story making. A broader message that is emotionally engaging allows for a two-way conversation.
  • Be consistent with the brand value. The brand needs to stand for something, and the content should be relevant to and consistent with the image of the brand. Pepsi announced an award of $20 million in grants to individuals, businesses, and nonprofits that promote a new idea to make a positive impact on community. A large number of submissions were about social causes that had nothing to do with Pepsi, and some, like reducing obesity, were in conflict with Pepsi's product.
  • Create engagement that drives business. Too much entertainment in ads may engage customers but detract from both communicating the brand message and increasing sales. Simply measuring the number of video views provides only a partial picture of a program's success.

Intelligent Automation

PRIORITY 2

  • Extend Automation Practices with AI and ML

AI and ML are rapidly growing. Organizations see the value of machines intelligently executing high-performance and dynamic tasks such as driving cars and detecting fraud. Senior leaders see AI and ML as opportunities to extend their business process automation investments.

Introduction

Intelligent automation is the next step in your business process automation journey

What is intelligent automation (IA)?

Intelligent automation (IA) is the combination of traditional automation technologies, such as business process management (BPM) and robotic process automation (RPA), with AI and ML. The goal is to further streamline and scale decision making across various business processes by:

  • Removing human interactions.
  • Addressing decisions that involve complex variables.
  • Automatically adapting processes to changing conditions.
  • Bridging disparate automation technologies into an integrated end-to-end value delivery pipeline.

"For IA to succeed, employees must be involved in the transformation journey so they can experience firsthand the benefits of a new way of working and creating business value," (Cognizant).

What is the difference between IA and hyperautomation?

"Hyperautomation is the act of automating everything in an organization that can be automated. The intent is to streamline processes across an organization using intelligent automation, which includes AI, RPA and other technologies, to run without human intervention. … Hyperautomation is a business-driven, disciplined approach that organizations use to rapidly identify, vet, and automate as many business and IT processes as possible" (IBM, 2021).

Note that hyperautomation often enables IA, but teams solely adopting IA do not need to abide to its automation-first principles.

IA is a combination of various tools and technologies

What tools and technologies are involved in IA?

  • Artificial intelligence (AI) & Machine Learning (ML) – AI systems perform tasks mimicking human intelligence such as learning from experience and problem solving. AI is making its own decisions without human intervention. Machine learning systems learn from experience and without explicit instructions. They learn patterns from data then analyze and make predictions based on past behavior and the patterns learned. AI is a combination of technologies and can include machine learning.
  • Intelligent Business Process Management System (iBPMS) – Combination of BPM tools with AI and other intelligence capabilities.
  • Robotic Process Automation (RPA) – Robots leveraging an application's UI rather than programmatic access. Automate rules-based, repetitive tasks performed by human workers with AI/ML.
  • Process Mining & Discovery – Process mining involves reading system event logs and application transactions and applying algorithmic analysis to automatically identify and map inferred business processes. Process discovery involves unintrusive virtual agents that sit on a user's desktop and record and monitor how they interact with applications to perform tasks and processes. Algorithms are then used to map and analyze the processes.
  • Intelligent Document Processing – The conversion of physical or unstructured documents into a structured, digital format that can be used in automation solutions. Optical character recognition (OCR) and natural language processing (NPL) are common tools used to enable this capability.
  • Advanced Analytics – The gathering, synthesis, transformation, and delivery of insightful and consumable information that supports data-driven decision making. Data is queried from various disparate sources and can take on a variety of structured and unstructured formats.

The cycle of IA technologies

Signals

Process automation is an executive priority and requires organizational buy-in

Stakeholders recognize the importance of business process automation and AI and are looking for ways to deliver more value using these technologies.

  • 90% of executives stated automating business workflows post-COVID-19 will ensure business continuity (Kofax, 2022).
  • 88% of executives stated they need to fast-track their end-to-end digital transformation (Kofax, 2022).

However, the advertised benefits to vendors of enabling these desired automations may not be easily achievable because of:

  • Manual and undocumented business processes.
  • Fragmented and inaccessible systems.
  • Poor data quality, insights, and security.
  • The lack of process governance and management practice.
A circle graph is shown with 49% of the circle coloured in dark blue, with the number 49% in the centre.

of CXOs stated staff sufficiency, skill and engagement issues as a minor IT pain point compared to 51% of CIOs stated this issue as a major pain point.

Source: CEO-CIO Alignment Diagnostics, August 2021 to July 2022; n=568.

A circle graph is shown with 36% of the circle coloured in dark blue, with the number 36% in the centre.

of organizations have already invested in AI or machine learning.

Source: Tech Trends and Priorities 2023; N=662

Drivers

Quality & throughput

Products and services delivered through an undefined and manual process risk the creation of preventable and catchable defects, security flaws and holes, missing information, and other quality issues. IA solutions consistently reinforce quality standards the same way across all products and services while tailoring outputs to meet an individual's specific needs. Success is dependent on the accurate interpretation and application of quality standards and the user's expectations.

Worker productivity

IA removes the tedious, routine, and mundane tasks that distract and restrict employees from doing more valuable, impactful, and cognitively focused activities. Practical insights can also be generated through IA tools that help employees make data-driven decisions, evaluate problems from different angles, and improve the usability and value of the products and services they produce.

Good process management practices

Automation magnifies existing inefficiencies of a business process management practice, such as unclear and outdated process documentation and incorrect assumptions. IA reinforces the importance of good business process optimization practices, such as removing waste and inefficiencies in a thoughtful way, choosing the most appropriate automation solution, and configuring the process in the right way to maximize the solution's value.

Benefits & Risks

Benefits

  • Documentation
  • Hands-Off
  • Reusability

All business processes must be mapped and documented to be automated, including business rules, data entities, applications, and control points.

IA can be configured and orchestrated to automatically execute when certain business, process, or technology conditions are met in an unattended or attended manner.

IA is applicable in use cases beyond traditional business processes, such as automated testing, quality control, audit, website scraping, integration platform, customer service, and data transfer.

Risks

  • Data Quality & Bias
  • Ethics
  • Recovery & Security
  • Management

The accuracy and relevance of the decisions IA makes are dependent on the overall quality of the data
used to train it.

Some decisions can have significant reputational, moral, and ethical impacts if made incorrectly.
The question is whether it is appropriate for a non-human to make that decision.

IA is composed of technologies that can be compromised or fail. Without the proper monitoring, controls,
and recovery protocols, impacted IA will generate significant business and IT costs and can potentially harm customers, employees, and the organization.

Low- and no-code capabilities ease and streamline IA development, which makes it susceptible to becoming unmanageable. Discipline is needed to ensure IA owners are aware of the size and health of the IA portfolio.

Address your pressure points to fully realize the benefits of this priority

Success can be dependent on your ability to address your pressure points.

Attracting and Retaining Talent

Be transparent and support role changes.

Plan to address the human sentiment with automation (e.g. job security) and the transition of the role to other activities.

Maximizing the Return on Technology

Automate applications across multiple business functions.

Recognize the value opportunities of improving and automating the integration of cross-functional processes.

Confidently Shifting to Digital

Maximize the learning of automation fit.

Select the right capabilities to demonstrate the value of IA while using lessons learned to establish the appropriate support.

Addressing Competing Priorities

Recognize automation opportunities with capability maps.

Use a capability diagram to align strategic IA objectives with tactical and technical IA initiatives.

Fostering a Collaborative Culture

Involve the user in the delivery process.

Maximize automation adoption by ensuring the user finds value in its use before deployment.

Creating High-Throughput Teams

Remove manual, error-prone, and mundane tasks.

Look for ways to improve team throughput by removing wasteful activities, enforcing quality, and automating away tasks driving down productivity.

Recommendations

Build your business process automation playbook and practice

Formalize your business process automation practice with a good toolkit and a repeatable set of tactics and techniques.

  • Clarify the problem being solved with IA.
  • Optimate your processes. Apply good practices to first optimize (opti-) and then automate (-mate) key business processes.
  • Deliver minimum viable automations (MVAs). Maximize the learning of automation solutions and business operational changes through small, strategic automation use cases.

Related Research:

Explore the various IA tooling options

Each IA tool will address a different problem. Which tool to choose is dependent on a variety of factors, such as functional suitability, technology suitability, delivery and support capabilities, alignment to strategic business goals, and the value it is designed to deliver.

Related Research:

Recommendations

Introduce AI and ML thoughtfully and with a plan

Despite the many promises of AI, organizations are struggling to fully realize its potential. The reasons boil down to a lack of understanding of when these technologies should and shouldn't be used, as well as a fear of the unknown. The plan to adopt AI should include:

  • Understanding of what AI really means in practice.
  • Identifying specific applications of AI in the business.
  • Understanding the type of AI applicable for the situation.

Related Research:

Mitigate AI and ML bias

Biases can be introduced into an IA system at any stage of the development process, from the data you collect, to the way you collect it, to which algorithms are used and what assumptions were made. In most cases, AI and ML bias is a is a social, political, and business problem.

While bias may not be intentional nor completely prevented or eliminated, early detection, good design, and other proactive preventative steps can be taken to minimize its scope and impact.

Related Research:

CASE STUDY
University Hospitals

Challenge

University Hospitals Cleveland (UH) faces the same challenge that every major hospital confronts regarding how to deliver increasingly complex, high-quality healthcare to a diverse population efficiently and economically. In 2017, UH embarked on a value improvement program aiming to improve quality while saving $400 million over a five-year period.

In emergency department (ED) and inpatient units, leaders found anticipating demand difficult, and consequently units were often over-staffed when demand was low and under-staffed when demand was high. Hospital leaders were uncertain about how to reallocate resources based on capacity needs.

Solution

UH turned to Hospital IQ's Census Solution to proactively manage capacity, staff, and flow in the ED and inpatient areas.

By applying AI, ML, and external data (e.g. weather forecasts) to the hospital's own data (including EMR data and hospital policies), the solution helped UH make two-day census forecasts that managers used to determine whether to open or close in-patient beds and, when necessary, divert low-acuity patients to other hospitals in the system to handle predicted patient volume.

Source: University Hospitals

Results

ED boarding hours have declined by 10% and the hospital has seen a 50% reduction in the number of patients who leave the hospital without
being seen.

UH also predicts in advance patients ready for discharge and identifies roadblocks, reducing the average length of stay by 15%. UH is able to better manage staff, reducing overtime and cutting overall labor costs.

The hospital has also increased staff satisfaction and improved patient safety by closing specific units on weekends and increasing the number of rooms that can be sterilized.

Proactive Application Management

PRIORITY 3

  • Strengthen Applications to Prevent and Minimize the Impact of Future Issues

Application management is often viewed as a support function rather than an enabler of business growth. Focus and investments are only placed on application management when it becomes a problem. The lack of governance and practice accountability leaves this practice in a chaotic state: politics take over, resources are not strategically allocated, and customers are frustrated. As a result, application management is often reactive and brushed aside for new development.

Introduction

What is application management?

Application management ensures valuable software is successfully delivered and is maintained for continuous and sustainable business operations. It contains a repeatable set of activities needed to rationalize and roadmap products and services while balancing priorities of new features and maintenance tasks.

Unfortunately, application management is commonly perceived as a practice that solely addresses issues, updates, and incidents. However, application management teams are also tasked with new value delivery that was not part of the original release.

Why is an effective application maintenance (reactive) practice not good enough?

Application maintenance is the "process of modifying a software system or its components after delivery to correct faults, improve performance or other attributes, or adapt to a changed environment or business process," (IEEE, 1998). While it is critical to quickly fix defects and issues when they occur, reactively addressing them is more expensive than discovering them early and employing the practices to prevent them.

Even if an application is working well, its framework, architecture, and technology may not be compatible with the possible upcoming changes stakeholders and vendors may want to undertake. Applications may not be problems now, but they soon can be.

What motivates proactive application changes?

This image shows the motivations for proactive application changes, sorted by external and internal sources.

Proactive application management must be disciplined and applied strategically

Proactive application management practices are critical to maintaining business continuity. They require continuous review and modification so that applications are resilient and can address current and future scenarios. Depending on the value of the application, its criticality to business operations, and its susceptibility to technology change, a more proactive management approach may be warranted. Stakeholders can then better manage resources and budget according to the needs of specific products.

Reactive Management

Run-to-Failure

Fix and enhance the product when it breaks. In most cases, a plan is in place ahead of a failure, so that the problem can be addressed without significant disruption and costs.

Preventive

Regularly inspect and optimize the product to reduce the likelihood that it will fail in the future. Schedule inspections based on a specific timeframe or usage threshold.

Predictive

Predict failures before they happen using performance and usage data to alert teams when products are at risk of failure according to specified conditions.

Reliability and Risk Based

Analyze all possible failure scenarios for each component of the product and create tailored delivery plans to improve the stability, reliability, and value of each product.

Proactive Management

Signals

Applications begin to degrade as soon as they are used

Today's applications are tomorrow's shelfware. They gradually lose their value, stability, robustness, and compatibility with other enterprise technologies. The longer these applications are left unattended or simply "keeping the lights on," the more risks they will bring to the application portfolio, such as:

  • Discovery and exploitation of security flaws and gaps.
  • Increasing the lock-in to specific vendor technologies.
  • Inconsistent application performance across various workloads.

These impacts are further compounded by the continuous work done on a system burdened with technical debt. Technical debt describes the result of avoided costs that, over time, cause ongoing business impacts. Left unaddressed, technical debt can become an existential threat that risks your organization's ability to effectively compete and serve its customers. Unfortunately, most organizations have a significant, growing, unmanageable technical debt portfolio.

A circle graph is shown with 60% of the circle coloured in dark green, with the number 60% in the centre.

of respondents stated they saw an increase in perceived change in technical debt during the past three years. A quarter of respondents indicated that it stayed the same.

Source: McKinsey Digital, 2020.

US
$4.35
Million

is the average cost of a data breach in 2022. This figure represents a 2.6% increase from last year. The average cost has climbed 12.7% since 2020.

Source: IBM, 2022; N=537.

Drivers

Technical debt

Historical decisions to meet business demands by deferring key quality, architectural, or other software delivery activities often lead to inefficient and incomplete code, fragile legacy systems, broken processes, data quality problems, and the other contributors to technical debt. The impacts for this challenge is further heightened if organizations are not actively refactoring and updating their applications behind the scenes. Proactive application management is intended to raise awareness of application fragility and prioritize comprehensive refactoring activities alongside new feature development.

Long-term application value

Applications are designed, developed, and tested against a specific set of parameters which may become less relevant over time as the business matures, technology changes, and user behaviors and interactions shift. Continuous monitoring of the application system, regular stakeholder and user feedback, and active technology trend research and vendor engagement will reveal tasks to prepare an application for future value opportunities or stability and resilience concerns.

Security and resiliency

Innovative approaches to infiltrating and compromising applications are becoming prevailing stakeholder concerns. The loopholes and gaps in existing application security protocols, control points, and end-user training are exploited to gain the trust of unsuspecting users and systems. Proactive application management enforces continuous security reviews to determine whether applications are at risk. The goal is to prevent an incident from happening by hardening or complementing measures already in place.

Benefits & Risks

Benefits

  • Consistent Performance
  • Robustness
  • Operating Costs

Users expect the same level of performance and experience from their applications in all scenarios. A proactive approach ensures the configurations meet the current needs of users and dependent technologies.

Proactively managed applications are resilient to the latest security concerns and upcoming trends.

Continuous improvements to the underlying architecture, codebase, and interfaces can minimize the cost to maintain and operate the application, such as the transition to a loosely coupled architecture and the standardization of REST APIs.

Risks

  • Stakeholder Buy-In
  • Delayed Feature Releases
  • Team Capacity
  • Discipline

Stakeholders may not see the association between the application's value and its technical quality.

Updates and enhancements are system changes much like any application function. Depending
on the priority of these changes, new functions may be pushed off to a future release cycle.

Applications teams require dedicated capacity to proactively manage applications, but they are often occupied meeting other stakeholder demands.

Overinvesting in certain application management activities (such as refactoring, re-architecture, and redesign) can create more challenges. Knowing how much to do is important.

Address your pressure points to fully realize the benefits of this priority

Success can be dependent on your ability to address your pressure points.

Attracting and Retaining Talent

Shift focus from maintenance to innovation.

Work on the most pressing and critical requests first, with a prioritization framework reflecting cross-functional priorities.

Maximizing the Return on Technology

Improve the reliability of mission-critical applications.

Regularly verify and validate applications are up to date with the latest patches and fixes and comply with industry good practices and regulations.

Confidently Shifting to Digital

Prepare applications to support digital tools and technologies.

Focus enhancements on the key components required to support the integration, performance, and security needs of digital.

Addressing Competing Priorities

Rationalize the health of the applications.

Use data-driven, compelling insights to justify the direction and prioritization of applications initiatives.

Fostering a Collaborative Culture

Include the technical perspective in the viability of future applications plans.

Demonstrate how poorly maintained applications impede the team's ability to deliver confidently and quickly.

Creating High-Throughput Teams

Simplify applications to ease delivery and maintenance.

Refactor away application complexities and align the application portfolio to a common quality standard to reduce the effort to deliver and test changes.

Recommendations

Reinforce your application maintenance practice

Maintenance is often viewed as a support function rather than an enabler of business growth. Focus and investments are only placed on maintenance when it becomes a problem.

  • Justify the necessity of streamlined maintenance.
  • Strengthen triaging and prioritization practices.
  • Establish and govern a repeatable process.

Ensure product issues, incidents, defects, and change requests are promptly handled to minimize business and IT risks.

Related Research:

Build an application management practice

Apply the appropriate management approaches to maintain business continuity and balance priorities and commitments among maintenance and new development requests.

This practice serves as the foundation for creating exceptional customer experience by emphasizing cross-functional accountability for business value and product and service quality.

Related Research:

Recommendations

Manage your technical debt

Technical debt is a type of technical risk, which in turn is business risk. It's up to the business to decide whether to accept technical debt or mitigate it. Create a compelling argument to stakeholders as to why technical debt should be a business priority rather than just an IT one.

  • Define and identify your technical debt.
  • Conduct a business impact analysis.
  • Identify opportunities to better manage technical debt.

Related Research:

Gauge your application's health

Application portfolio management is nearly impossible to perform without an honest and thorough understanding of your portfolio's alignment to business capabilities, business value, total cost of ownership, end-user reception and satisfaction, and technical health.

Develop data-driven insights to help you decide which applications to retire, upgrade, retrain on, or maintain to meet the demands of the business.

Related Research:

Recommendations

Adopt site reliability engineering (SRE) and DevOps practices

Site reliability engineering (SRE) is an operational model for running online services more reliably by a team of dedicated reliability-focused engineers.

DevOps, an operational philosophy promoting development and operations collaboration, can bring the critical insights to make application management practices through SRE more valuable.

Related Research:

CASE STUDY
Government Agency

Goal

A government agency needed to implement a disciplined, sustainable application delivery, planning, and management process so their product delivery team could deliver features and changes faster with higher quality. The goal was to ensure change requests, fixes, and new features would relieve requester frustrations, reduce regression issues, and allow work to be done on agreeable and achievable priorities organization-wide. The new model needed to increase practice efficiency and visibility in order to better manage technical debt and focus on value-added solutions.

Solution

This organization recognized a number of key challenges that were inhibiting its team's ability to meet its goals:

  • The product backlog had become too long and unmanageable.
  • Delivery resources were not properly allocated to meet the skills and capabilities needed to successfully meet commitments.
  • Quality wasn't defined or enforced, which generated mounting technical debt.
  • There was a lack of clear metrics and defined roles and responsibilities.
  • The business had unrealistic and unachievable expectations.

Source: Info-Tech Workshop

Key practices implemented

  • Schedule quarterly business satisfaction surveys.
  • Structure and facilitate regular change advisory board meetings.
  • Define and enforce product quality standards.
  • Standardize a streamlined process with defined roles.
  • Configure management tools to better handle requests.

Multisource Systems

PRIORITY 4

  • Manage an Ecosystem Composed of In-House and Outsourced Systems

Various market and company factors are motivating a review on resource and system sourcing strategies. The right sourcing model provides key skills, resources, and capabilities to meet innovation, time to market, financial, and quality goals of the business. However, organizations struggle with how best to support sourcing partners and to allocate the right number of resources to maximize success.

Introduction

A multisource system is an ecosystem of integrated internally and externally developed applications, data, and infrastructure. These technologies can be custom developed, heavily configured vendor solutions, or they may be commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) solutions. These systems can also be developed, supported, and managed by internal staff, in partnership with outsourced contractors, or be completely outsourced. Multisource systems should be configured and orchestrated in a way that maximizes the delivery of specific value drivers for the targeted audience.

Successfully selecting a sourcing approach is not a simple RFP exercise to choose the lowest cost

Defining and executing a sourcing approach can be a significant investment and risk because of the close interactions third-party services and partners will have with internal staff, enterprise applications and business capabilities. A careful selection and design is necessary.

The selection of a sourcing partner is not simple. It involves the detailed inspection and examination of different candidates and matching their fit to the broader vision of the multisource system. In cases where control is critical, technology stack and resource sourcing consolidation to a few vendors and partners is preferred. In other cases, where worker productivity and system flexibility are highly prioritized, a plug-and-play best-of-breed approach is preferred.

Typical factors involved in sourcing decisions.

Sourcing needs to be driven by your department and system strategies

How does the department want to be perceived?

The image that your applications department and teams want to reflect is frequently dependent on the applications they deliver and support, the resources they are composed of, and the capabilities they provide.

Therefore, choosing the right sourcing approach should be driven by understanding who the teams are and want to be (e.g. internal builder, an integrator, a plug-in player), what they can or want to do (e.g. custom-develop or implement), and what they can deliver or support (e.g. cloud or on-premises) must be established.

What value is the system delivering?

Well-integrated systems are the lifeblood of your organization. They provide the capabilities needed to deliver value to customers, employees, and stakeholders. However, underlying system components may not be sourced under a unified strategy, which can lead to duplicate vendor services and high operational costs.

The right sourcing approach ensures your partners address key capabilities in your system's delivery and support, and that they are positioned to maximize the value of critical and high-impact components.

Signals

Business demand may outpace what vendors can support or offer

Outsourcing and shifting to a buy-over-build applications strategy are common quick fixes to dealing with capacity and skills gaps. However, these quick fixes often become long-term implementations that are not accounted for in the sourcing selection process. Current application and resource sourcing strategies must be reviewed to ensure that vendor arrangements meet the current and upcoming demands and challenges of the business, customers, and enterprise technologies, such as:

  • Pressure from stakeholders to lower operating costs while maintaining or increasing quality and throughput.
  • Technology lock-in that addresses short-term needs but inhibits long-term growth and maturity.
  • Team capacity and talent acquisition not meeting the needs of the business.
A circle graph is shown with 42% of the circle coloured in dark brown, with the number 42% in the centre.

of respondents stated they outsourced software development fully or partly in the last 12 months (2021).

Source: Coding Sans, 2021.

A circle graph is shown with 65% of the circle coloured in dark brown, with the number 65% in the centre.

of respondents stated they were at least somewhat satisfied with the result of outsourcing software development.

Source: Coding Sans, 2021.

Drivers

Business-managed applications

Employees are implementing and building applications without consulting, notifying, or heeding the advice of IT. IT is often ill-equipped and under-resourced to fight against shadow IT. Instead, organizations are shifting the mindset of "fight shadow IT" to "embrace business-managed applications," using good practices in managing multisource systems. A multisource approach strikes the right balance between user empowerment and centralized control with the solutions and architecture that can best enable it.

Unique problems to solve

Point solutions offer features to address unique use cases in uncommon technology environments. However, point solutions are often deployed in siloes with limited integration or overlap with other solutions. The right sourcing strategy accommodates the fragmented nature of point solutions into a broader enterprise system strategy, whether that be:

  • Multisource best of breed – integrate various technologies that provide subsets of the features needed for supporting business functions.
  • Multisource custom – integrate systems built in-house with technologies developed by external organizations.
  • Vendor add-ons and integrations – enhance an existing vendor's offering by using their system add-ons as upgrades, new add-ons, or integrations.

Vendor services

Some vendor services in a multisource environment may be redundant, conflicting, or incompatible. Given that multisource systems are regularly changing, it is difficult to identify what services are affected, what would be needed to fill the gap of the removed solution, or which redundant services should be removed.

A multisource approach motivates the continuous rationalization of your vendor services and partners to determine the right mixture of in-house and outsourced resources, capabilities, and technologies.

Benefits & Risks

Benefits

  • Business-Focused Solution
  • Flexibility
  • Cost Optimization

Multisource systems can be designed to support an employee's ability to select the tools they want and need.

The environment is architected in a loosely coupled approach to allow applications to be easily added, removed, and modified with minimized impact to other integrated applications.

Rather than investing in large solutions upfront, applications are adopted when they are needed and are removed when little value is gained. Disciplined application portfolio management is necessary to see the full value of this benefit.

Risks

  • Manageable Sprawl
  • Policy Adherence
  • Integration & Compatibility

The increased number and diversity of applications in multisource system environments can overwhelm system managers who do not have an effective application portfolio management practice.

Fragmented application implementations risk inconsistent adherence to security and other quality policies, especially in situations where IT is not involved.

Application integration can quickly become tangled, untraceable, and unmanageable because of varying team and vendor preferences for specific integration technologies and techniques.

Address your pressure points to fully realize the benefits of this priority

Success can be dependent on your ability to address your pressure points.

Attracting and Retaining Talent

Enable business-managed applications.

Create the integrations to enable the easy connection of desired tools to enterprise systems with the appropriate guardrails.

Maximizing the Return on Technology

Enhance the functionality of existing applications.

Complement current application capability gaps with data, features, and services from third-party applications.

Confidently Shifting to Digital

Use best-of-breed tools to meet specific digital needs.

Select the best tools to meet the unique and special functional needs of the digital vision.

Addressing Competing Priorities

Agree on a common philosophy on system composition.

Establish an owner of the multisource system to guide how the system should mature as the organization grows.

Fostering a Collaborative Culture

Discuss how applications can work together better in an ecosystem.

Build committees to discuss how applications can better support each other and drive more value.

Creating High-Throughput Teams

Alleviate delivery bottlenecks and issues.

Leverage third-party sources to fill skills and capacity gaps until a long-term solution can be implemented.

Recommendations

Define the goals of your applications department and product vision

Understanding the applications team's purpose and image is critical in determining how the system they are managing and the skills and capacities they need should be sourced.

Changing and conflicting definitions of value and goals make it challenging to convey an agreeable strategy of the multisource system. An achievable vision and practical tactics ensure all parties in the multisource system are moving in the same direction.

Related Research:

Develop a sourcing partner strategy

Almost half of all sourcing initiatives do not realize projected savings, and the biggest reason is the choice of partner (Zhang et al., 2018). Making the wrong choice means inferior products, higher costs and the loss of both clients and reputation.

Choosing the right sourcing partner involves understanding current skills and capacities, finding the right matching partner based on a desired profile, and managing a good working relationship that sees short-term gains and supports long-term goals.

Related Research:

Recommendations

Strengthen enterprise integration practices

Integration strategies that are focused solely on technology are likely to complicate rather than simplify because little consideration is given on how other systems and processes will be impacted. Enterprise integration needs to bring together business process, applications, and data – in that order.

Kick-start the process of identifying opportunities for improvement by mapping how applications and data are coordinated to support business activities.

Related Research:

Manage your solution architecture and application portfolio

Haphazardly implementing and integrating applications can generate significant security, performance, and data risks. A well-thought-through solution architecture is essential in laying the architecture quality principles and roadmap on how the multisource system can grow and evolve in a sustainable and maintainable way.

Good application portfolio management complements the solution architecture as it indicates when low-value and unused applications should be removed to reduce system complexity.

Related Research:

Recommendations

Embrace business-managed applications

Multisource systems bring a unique opportunity to support the business and end users' desire to implement and develop their own applications. However, traditional models of managing applications may not accommodate the specific IT governance and management practices required to operate business-managed applications:

  • A collaborative and trusting business-IT relationship is key.
  • The role of IT must be reimagined.
  • Business must be accountable for its decisions.

Related Research:

CASE STUDY
Cognizant

Situation

  • Strives to be primarily an industry-aligned organization that delivers multiple service lines in multiple geographies.
  • Cognizant seeks to carefully consider client culture to create a one-team environment.
  • Value proposition is a consultative approach bringing thought leadership and mutually adding value to the relationship vs. the more traditional order-taker development partner.
  • Wants to share in solution development to facilitate shared successes. Geographic alignment drives knowledge of the client and their challenges, not just about time zone and supportability.
  • Offers one of the largest offshore capabilities in the world, supported by local and nearshore resources to drive local knowledge.
  • Today's clients don't typically want a black box, they are sophisticated and want transparency around the process and solution, to have a partner.
  • Clients do want to know where the work is being delivered from, how it's being done.

Source: interview with Jay MacIsaac, Cognizant.

Approach

  • Best relationship comes where teams operate as one.
  • Clients are seeking value, not a development black box.
  • Clients want to have a partner they can engage with, not just an order taker.
  • Want to build a one-team culture with shared goals and deliver business value.
  • Seek a partner that will add to their thinking not echo it.

Results

  • Cognizant is continuing to deliver double-digit growth and continues to strive for top quartile performance.
  • Growth in the client base has seen the company grow to over 340,000 associates worldwide.

Digital Organization as a Platform

PRIORITY 5

  • Create a Common Digital Interface to Access All Products and Services

A digital platform enables organizations to leverage a flexible, reliable, and scalable foundation to create a valuable DX, ease delivery and management efforts, maximize existing investments, and motivate the broader shift to digital. This approach provides a standard to architect, integrate, configure, and modernize the applications that compose the platform.

Introduction

What is digital organization as a platform (DOaaP)?

Digital organization as a platform (DOaaP) is a collection of integrated digital services, products, applications, and infrastructure that is used as a vehicle to meet and exceed an organization's digital strategies. It often serves as an accessible "place for exchanges of information, goods, or services to occur between producers and consumers as well as the community that interacts
with said platform" (Watts, 2020).

DOaaP involves a strategy that paves the way for organizations to be digital. It helps organizations use their assets (e.g. data, processes, products, services) in the most effective ways and become more open to cooperative delivery, usage, and management. This opens opportunities for innovation and cross-department collaborations.

How is DOaaP described?

  1. Open and Collaborative
    • Open organization: open data, open APIs, transparency, and user participation.
    • Collaboration, co-creation, crowdsourcing, and innovation
  2. Accessible and Connected
    • Digital inclusion
    • Channel ubiquity
    • Integrity and interoperability
    • Digital marketplace
  3. Digital and Programmable
    • Digital identity
    • Policies and processes as code
    • Digital products and services
    • Enabling digital platforms

Digital organizations follow a common set of principles and practices

Customer-centricity

Digital organizations are driven by customer focus, meeting and exceeding customer expectations. It must design its services with a "digital first" principle, providing access through every expected channel and including seamless integration and interoperability with various departments, partners, and third-party services. It also means creating trust in its ability to provide secure services and to keep privacy and ethics as core pillars.

Leadership, management, and strategies

Digital leadership brings customer focus to the enterprise and its structures and organizes efficient networks and ecosystems. Accomplishing this means getting rid of silos and a siloed mentality and aligning on a digital vision to design policies and services that are efficient, cost-effective, and provide maximum benefit to the user. Asset sharing, co-creation, and being open and transparent become cornerstones of a digital organization.

Infrastructure

Providing digital services across demographics and geographies requires infrastructure, and that in turn requires long-term vision, smart investments, and partnerships with various source partners to create the necessary foundational infrastructure upon which to build digital services.

Digitization and automation

Automation and digitization of processes and services, as well as creating digital-first products, lead to increased efficiency and reach of the organization across demographics and geographies. Moreover, by taking a digital-first approach, digital organizations future-proof their services and demonstrate their commitment to stakeholders.

Enabling platforms

DOaaP embraces open standards, designing and developing organizational platforms and ecosystems with a cloud-first mindset and sound API strategies. Developer experience must also take center stage, providing the necessary tools and embracing Agile and DevOps practices and culture become prerequisites. Cybersecurity and privacy are central to the digital platform; hence they must be part of the design and development principles and practices.

Signals

The business expects support for digital products and services

Digital transformation continues to be a high-priority initiative for many organizations, and they see DOaaP as an effective way to enable and exploit digital capabilities. However, DOaaP unleashes new strategies, opportunities, and challenges that are elusive or unfamiliar to business leaders. Barriers in current business operating models may limit DOaaP success, such as:

  • Department and functional silos
  • Dispersed, fragmented and poor-quality data
  • Ill-equipped and under-skilled resources to support DOaaP adoption
  • System fragmentation and redundancies
  • Inconsistent integration tactics employed across systems
  • Disjointed user experience leading to low engagement and adoption

DOaaP is not just about technology, and it is not the sole responsibility of either IT or business. It is the collective responsibility of the organization.

A circle graph is shown with 47% of the circle coloured in dark blue, with the number 47% in the centre.

of organizations plan to unlock new value through digital. 50% of organizations are planning major transformation over the next three years.

Source: Nash Squared, 2022.

A circle graph is shown with 70% of the circle coloured in dark blue, with the number 70% in the centre.

of organizations are undertaking digital expansion projects focused on scaling their business with technology. This result is up from 57% in 2021.

Source: F5 Inc, 2022.

Drivers

Unified brand and experience

Users should have the same experience and perception of a brand no matter what product or service they use. However, fragmented implementation of digital technologies and inconsistent application of design standards makes it difficult to meet this expectation. DOaaP embraces a single design and DX standard for all digital products and services, which creates a consistent perception of your organization's brand and reputation irrespective of what products and services are being used and how they are accessed.

Accessibility

Rapid advancement of end-user devices and changes to end-user behaviors and expectations often outpace an organization's ability to meet these requirements. This can make certain organization products and services difficult to find, access and leverage. DOaaP creates an intuitive and searchable interface to all products and services and enables the strategic combination of technologies to collectively deliver more value.

Justification for modernization

Many opportunities are left off the table when legacy systems are abstracted away rather than modernized. However, legacy systems may not justify the investment in modernization because their individual value is outweighed by the cost. A DOaaP initiative motivates decision makers to look at the entire system (i.e. modern and legacy) to determine which components need to be brought up to a minimum digital state. The conversation has now changed. Legacy systems should be modernized to increase the collective benefit of the entire DOaaP.

Benefits & Risks

Benefits

  • Look & Feel
  • User Adoption
  • Shift to Digital

A single, modern, customizable interface enables a common look and feel no matter what and how the platform is being accessed.

Organizations can motivate and encourage the adoption and use of all products and services through the platform and increase the adoption of underused technologies.

DOaaP motivates and supports the modernization of data, processes, and systems to meet the goals and objectives outlined in the broader digital transformation strategy.

Risks

  • Data Quality
  • System Stability
  • Ability to Modernize
  • Business Model Change

Each system may have a different definition of commonly used entities (e.g. customer), which can cause data quality issues when information is shared among these systems.

DOaaP can stress the performance of underlying systems due to the limitations of some systems to handle increased traffic.

Some systems cannot be modernized due to cost constraints, business continuity risks, vendor lock-in, legacy and lore, or other blocking factors.

Limited appetite to make the necessary changes to business operations in order to maximize the value of DOaaP technologies.

Address your pressure points to fully realize the benefits of this priority

Success can be dependent on your ability to address your pressure points.

Attracting and Retaining Talent Promote and showcase achievements and successes. Share the valuable and innovative work of your teams across the organization and with the public.
Maximizing the Return on Technology Increase visibility of underused applications. Promote the adoption and use of all products and services through the platform and use the lessons learned to justify removal, updates or modernizations.
Confidently Shifting to Digital Bring all applications up to a common digital standard. Define the baseline digital state all applications, data, and processes must be in to maximize the value of the platform.
Addressing Competing Priorities Map to a holistic platform vision, goals and objectives. Work with relevant stakeholders, teams and end users to agree on a common directive considering all impacted perspectives.
Fostering a Collaborative Culture Ensure the platform is configured to meet the individual needs of the users. Tailor the interface and capabilities of the platform to address users' functional and personal concerns.
Creating High-Throughput Teams Abstract the enterprise system to expedite delivery. Use the platform to standardize application system access to simplify platform changes and quicken development and testing.

Recommendations

Define your platform vision

Organizations realize that a digital model is the way to provide more effective services to their customers and end users in a cost-effective, innovative, and engaging fashion. DOaaP is a way to help support this transition.

However, various platform stakeholders will have different interpretations of and preferences for what this platform is intended to solve, what benefits it is supposed to deliver, and what capabilities it will deliver. A grounded vision is imperative to steer the roadmap and initiatives.

Related Research:

Assess and modernize your applications

Certain applications may not sufficiently support the compatibility, flexibility, and efficiency requirements of DOaaP. While workaround technologies and tactics can be employed to overcome these application challenges, the full value of the DOaaP may not be realized.

Reviewing the current state of the application portfolio will indicate the functional and value limitations of what DOaaP can provide and an indication of the scope of investment needed to bring applications up to a minimum state.

Related Research:

Recommendations

Understand and evaluate end-user needs

Technology has reached a point where it's no longer difficult for teams to build functional and valuable digital platforms. Rather, the difficulty lies in creating an interface and platform that people want to use and use frequently.

While it is important to increase the access and promotion of all products and services, orchestrating and configuring them in a way to deliver a satisfying experience is even more important. Applications teams must first learn about and empathize with the needs of end users.

Related Research:

Architect your platform

Formalizing and constructing DOaaP just for the sake of doing so often results in an initiative that is lengthy and costly and ends up being considered a failure.

The build and optimization of the platform must be predicated on a thorough understanding of the DOaaP's goals, objectives, and priorities and the business capabilities and process they are meant to support and enable. The appropriate architecture and delivery practices can then be defined and employed.

Related Research:

CASE STUDY
e-Estonia

Situation

The digital strategy of Estonia resulted in e-Estonia, with the vision of "creating a society with more transparency, trust, and efficiency." Estonia has addressed the challenge by creating structures, organizations, and a culture of innovation, and then using the speed and efficiency of digital infrastructure, apps, and services. This strategy can reduce or eliminate bureaucracy through transparency and automation.

Estonia embarked on its journey to making digital a priority in 1994-1996, focusing on a committed investment in infrastructure and digital literacy. With that infrastructure in place, they started providing digital services like an e-banking service (1996), e-tax and mobile parking (2002), and then went full steam ahead with a digital information interoperability platform in 2001, digital identity in 2002, e-health in 2008, and e-prescription in 2010. The government is now strategizing for AI.

Results

This image contains the results of the e-Estonia case study results

Source: e-Estonia

Practices employed

The e-Estonia digital government model serves as a reference for governments across the world; this is acknowledged by the various awards it has received, like #2 in "internet freedom," awarded by Freedom House in 2019; #1 on the "digital health index," awarded by the Bertelsmann Foundation in 2019; and #1 on "start-up friendliness," awarded by Index Venture in 2018.

References

"15th State of Agile Report." Digital.ai, 2021. Web.
"2022 HR Trends Report." McLean & Company, 2022.
"2022: State of Application Strategy Report." F5 Inc, 2022.
"Are Executives Wearing Rose-Colored Glasses Around Digital Transformation?" Cyara, 2021. Web.
"Cost of a Data Breach Report 2022." IBM, 2022. Web.
Dalal, Vishal, et al. "Tech Debt: Reclaiming Tech Equity." McKinsey Digital, Oct. 2020. Web.
"Differentiating Between Intelligent Automation and Hyperautomation." IBM, 15 October 2021. Web.
"Digital Leadership Report 2021." Harvey Nash Group, 2021.
"Digital Leadership Report 2022: The State of Digital." Nash Squared, 2022. Web.
Gupta, Sunil. "Driving Digital Strategy: A Guide to Reimagining Your Business." Harvard Business Review Press, 2018. Web.
Haff, Gordon. "State of Application Modernization Report 2022." Konveyor, 2022. Web.
"IEEE Standard for Software Maintenance: IEEE Std 1219-1998." IEEE Standard for Software Maintenance, 1998. Accessed Dec. 2015.
"Intelligent Automation." Cognizant, n.d. Web.
"Kofax 2022: Intelligent Automation Benchmark Study". Kofax, 2021. Web.
McCann, Leah. "Barco's Virtual Classroom at UCL: A Case Study for the Future of All University Classrooms?" rAVe, 2 July 2020, Web.
"Proactive Staffing and Patient Prioritization to Decompress ED and Reduce Length of Stay." University Hospitals, 2018. Web.
"Secrets of Successful Modernization." looksoftware, 2013. Web.
"State of Software Development." Coding Sans, 2021. Web.
"The State of Low-Code/No-Code." Creatio, 2021. Web.
"We Have Built a Digital Society and We Can Show You How." e-Estonia. n.d. Web.
Zanna. "The 5 Types of Experience Series (1): Brand Experience Is Your Compass." Accelerate in Experience, 9 February 2020. Web.
Zhang, Y. et al. "Effects of Risks on the Performance of Business Process Outsourcing Projects: The Moderating Roles of Knowledge Management Capabilities." International Journal of Project Management, 2018, vol. 36 no. 4, 627-639.

Research Contributors and Experts

This is a picture of Chris Harrington

Chris Harrington
Chief Technology Officer
Carolinas Telco Federal Credit Union

Chris Harrington is Chief Technology Officer (CTO) of Carolinas Telco Federal Credit Union. Harrington is a proven leader with over 20 years of experience developing and leading information technology and cybersecurity strategies and teams in the financial industry space.

This is a picture of Benjamin Palacio

Benjamin Palacio
Senior Information Technology Analyst County of Placer

Benjamin Palacio has been working in the application development space since 2007 with a strong focus on system integrations. He has seamlessly integrated applications data across multiple states into a single reporting solution for management teams to evaluate, and he has codeveloped applications to manage billions in federal funding. He is also a CSAC-credentialed IT Executive (CA, USA).

This is a picture of Scott Rutherford

Scott Rutherford
Executive Vice President, Technology
LGM Financial Services Inc.

Scott heads the Technology division of LGM Financial Services Inc., a leading provider of warranty and financing products to automotive OEMs and dealerships in Canada. His responsibilities include strategy and execution of data and analytics, applications, and technology operations.

This is a picture of Robert Willatts

Robert Willatts
IT Manager, Enterprise Business Solutions and Project Services
Town of Newmarket

Robert is passionate about technology, innovation, and Smart City Initiatives. He makes customer satisfaction as the top priority in every one of his responsibilities and accountabilities as an IT manager, such as developing business applications, implementing and maintaining enterprise applications, and implementing technical solutions. Robert encourages communication, collaboration, and engagement as he leads and guides IT in the Town of Newmarket.

This is a picture of Randeep Grewal

Randeep Grewal
Vice President, Enterprise Applications
Red Hat

Randeep has over 25 years of experience in enterprise applications, advanced analytics, enterprise data management, and consulting services, having worked at numerous blue-chip companies. In his most recent role, he is the Vice President of Enterprise Applications at Red Hat. Reporting to the CIO, he is responsible for Red Hat's core business applications with a focus on enterprise transformation, application architecture, engineering, and operational excellence. He previously led the evolution of Red Hat into a data-led company by maturing the enterprise data and analytics function to include data lake, streaming data, data governance, and operationalization of analytics for decision support.

Prior to Red Hat, Randeep was the director of global services strategy at Lenovo, where he led the strategy using market data to grow Lenovo's services business by over $400 million in three years. Prior to Lenovo, Randeep was the director of advanced analytics at Alliance One and helped build an enterprise data and analytics function. His earlier work includes seven years at SAS, helping SAS become a leader in business analytics, and at KPMG consulting, where he managed services engagements at Fortune 100 companies.

Develop Infrastructure & Operations Policies and Procedures

  • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}452|cart{/j2store}
  • member rating overall impact: 9.5/10 Overall Impact
  • member rating average dollars saved: $46,324 Average $ Saved
  • member rating average days saved: 42 Average Days Saved
  • Parent Category Name: Operations Management
  • Parent Category Link: /i-and-o-process-management
  • Time and money are wasted dealing with mistakes or missteps that should have been addressed by procedures or policies.
  • Standard operating procedures are less effective without a policy to provide a clear mandate and direction.
  • Adhering to policies is rarely a priority, as compliance often feels like an impediment to getting work done.
  • Processes aren’t measured or audited to assess policy compliance, which makes enforcing the policies next to impossible.

Our Advice

Critical Insight

  • Document what you need to document and forget the rest. Always check to see if you can use a previously approved policy before you create a new one. You may only need to create new guidelines or standards rather than approve a new policy.

Impact and Result

  • Start with a comprehensive policy framework to help you identify policy gaps. Prioritize and address those policy gaps.
  • Create effective policies that are reasonable, measurable, auditable, and enforceable.
  • Create and document procedures to support policy changes.

Develop Infrastructure & Operations Policies and Procedures Research & Tools

Start here – read the Executive Brief

Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should change your approach to developing Infrastructure & Operations policies and procedures, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

1. Identify policy and procedure gaps

Create a prioritized action plan for documentation based on business need.

  • Develop Infrastructure & Operations Policies and Procedures – Phase 1: Identify Policy and Procedure Gaps

2. Develop policies

Adapt policy templates to meet your business requirements.

  • Develop Infrastructure & Operations Policies and Procedures – Phase 2: Develop Policies
  • Availability and Capacity Management Policy
  • Business Continuity Management Policy
  • Change Control – Freezes & Risk Evaluation Policy
  • Change Management Policy
  • Configuration Management Policy
  • Firewall Policy
  • Hardware Asset Management Policy
  • IT Triage and Support Policy
  • Release Management Policy
  • Software Asset Management Policy
  • System Maintenance Policy – NIST
  • Internet Acceptable Use Policy

3. Document effective procedures

Improve policy adherence and service effectiveness through procedure standardization and documentation.

  • Develop Infrastructure & Operations Policies and Procedures – Phase 3: Document Effective Procedures
  • Capacity Plan Template
  • Change Management Standard Operating Procedure
  • Configuration Management Standard Operation Procedures
  • Incident Management and Service Desk SOP
  • DRP Summary Template
  • Service Desk Standard Operating Procedure
  • HAM Standard Operating Procedures
  • SAM Standard Operating Procedures
[infographic]

Further reading

Develop Infrastructure & Operations Policies and Procedures

Document what you need to document and forget the rest.

Table of contents

Project Rationale

Project Outlines

  • Phase 1: Identify Policy and Procedure Gaps
  • Phase 2: Develop Policies
  • Phase 3: Document Effective Procedures

Bibliography

ANALYST PERSPECTIVE

Document what you need to document now and forget the rest.

"Most IT organizations struggle to create and maintain effective policies and procedures, despite known improvements to consistency, compliance, knowledge transfer, and transparency.

The numbers are staggering. Fully three-quarters of IT professionals believe their policies need improvement, and the same proportion of organizations don’t update procedures as required.

At the same time, organizations that over-document and under-document perform equally poorly on key measures such as policy quality and policy adherence. Take a practical, step-by-step approach that prioritizes the documentation you need now. Leave the rest for later."

(Andrew Sharp, Research Manager, Infrastructure & Operations Practice, Info-Tech Research Group)

Our understanding of the problem

This Research Is Designed For:

  • Infrastructure Managers
  • Chief Technology Officers
  • IT Security Managers

This Research Will Help You:

  • Address policy gaps
  • Develop effective procedures and procedure documentation to support policy compliance

This Research Will Also Assist:

  • Chief Information Officers
  • Enterprise Risk and Compliance Officers
  • Chief Human Resources Officers
  • Systems Administrators and Engineers

This Research Will Help Them:

  • Understand the importance of a coherent approach to policy development
  • Understand the importance of Infrastructure & Operations policies
  • Support Infrastructure & Operations policy development and enforcement

Info-Tech Best Practice

This blueprint supports templates for key policies and procedures that help Infrastructure & Operations teams to govern and manage internal operations. For security policies, see the NIST SP 800-171 aligned Info-Tech blueprint, Develop and Deploy Security Policies.

Executive Summary

Situation

  • Time and money are wasted dealing with mistakes or missteps that should have been addressed by procedures or policies.
  • Standard operating procedures are less effective without a policy to provide a clear mandate and direction.

Complication

  • Existing policies were written, approved, signed – and forgotten for years because no one has time to maintain them.
  • Adhering to policies is rarely a priority, as compliance often feels like an impediment to getting work done.
  • Processes aren’t measured or audited to assess policy compliance, which makes enforcing the policies next to impossible.

Resolution

  • Start with a comprehensive policy framework to help you identify policy gaps. Prioritize and address those policy gaps.
  • Create effective policies that are reasonable, measurable, auditable, and enforceable.
  • Create and document procedures to support policy changes.

Info-Tech Insight

  1. Document what you need to document and forget the rest.
    Always check if a previously approved policy exists before you create a new one. You may only need to create new guidelines or standards rather than approve a new policy.
  2. Support policies with documented procedures.
    Build procedures that embed policy adherence in daily operations. Find opportunities to automate policy adherence (e.g. removing local admin rights from user computers).

What are policies, procedures, and processes?

A policy is a governing document that states the long-term goals of the organization and in broad strokes outlines how they will be achieved (e.g. a Data Protection Policy).

In the context of policies, a procedure is composed of the steps required to complete a task (e.g. a Backup and Restore Procedure). Procedures are informed by required standards and recommended guidelines. Processes, guidelines, and standards are three pillars that support the achievement of policy goals.

A process is higher level than a procedure – a set of tasks that deliver on an organizational goal.

Better policies and procedures reduce organizational risk and, by strengthening the ability to execute processes, enhance the organization’s ability to execute on its goals.

Visualization of policies, procedures, and processes using pillars. Two separate structures, 'Policy A' and 'Policy B', are each held up by three pillars labelled 'Standards', 'Procedures', and 'Guidelines'. Two lines pass through the pillars of both structures and are each labelled 'Value-creating process'.

Document to improve governance and operational processes

Deliver value

Build, deliver, and support Infrastructure assets in a consistent way, which ultimately reduces costs associated with downtime, errors, and rework. A good manual process is the foundation for a good automated process.

Simplify Training

Use documentation for knowledge transfer. Routine tasks can be delegated to less-experienced staff.

Maintain compliance

Comply with laws and regulations. Policies are often required for compliance, and formally documented and enforced policies help the organization maintain compliance by mandating required due diligence, risk reduction, and reporting activities.

Provide transparency

Build an open kitchen. Other areas of the organization may not understand how Infra & Ops works. Your documentation can provide the answer to the perennial question: “Why does that take so long?”

Info-Tech Best Practice

Governance goals must be supported with effective, well-aligned procedures and processes. Use Info-Tech’s research to support the key Infrastructure & Operations processes that enable your business to create value.

Document what you need to document – and forget the rest

Half of all organizations believe their policy suite is insufficient. (Info-Tech myPolicies Survey Data (N=59))

Pie chart with three sections labelled 'Too Many Policies and Procedures 14%', 'Adequate Policies and Procedures 37%', 'Insufficient Policies and Procedures 49%'

Too much documentation and a lack of documentation are both ineffective. (Info-Tech myPolicies Survey Data (N=59))

Two bar charts labelled 'Policy Adherence' and 'Policy Quality' each with three bars representing 'Too Many Policies and Procedures', 'Insufficient Policies and Procedures', and 'Adequate Policies and Procedures'. The values shown are an average score out of 5. For Policy Adherence: Too Many is 2.4, Insufficient is 2.1, and Adequate is 3.2. For Policy Quality: Too Many is 2.9, Insufficient is 2.6, and Adequate is 4.1.

77% of IT professionals believe their policies require improvement. (Kaspersky Lab)

Presenting: A COBIT-aligned policy suite

We’ve developed a suite of effective policy templates for every Infra & Ops manager based on Info-Tech’s IT Management & Governance Framework.

Policy templates and the related aspects of Info-Tech's IT Management & Governance Framework

Info-Tech Best Practice

Look for these symbols as you work through the deck. Prioritize and focus on the policies you work on first based on the value of the policy to the enterprise and the existing gaps in your governance structure.

Project outline

Phases

1. Identify policy and procedure gaps 2. Develop policies 3. Document effective procedures

Steps

  • Review and right-size the existing policy set
  • Create an action plan to address policy gaps
  • Modify policy templates and gather feedback
  • Implement, enforce, measure, and maintain new policies
  • Scope and outline procedures
  • Document and maintain procedures

Outcomes

Action list of policy and procedure gaps New or updated Infrastructure & Operations policies Procedure documentation

Use these icons to help direct you as you navigate this research

Use these icons to help guide you through each step of the blueprint and direct you to content related to the recommended activities.

A small monochrome icon of a wrench and screwdriver creating an X.

This icon denotes a slide where a supporting Info-Tech tool or template will help you perform the activity or step associated with the slide. Refer to the supporting tool or template to get the best results and proceed to the next step of the project.

A small monochrome icon depicting a person in front of a blank slide.

This icon denotes a slide with an associated activity. The activity can be performed either as part of your project or with the support of Info-Tech team members, who will come onsite to facilitate a workshop for your organization.

Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

DIY Toolkit

Guided Implementation

Workshop

Consulting

"Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful." "Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track." "We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place." "Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project."

Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

Accelerate policy development with a Guided Implementation

Your trusted advisor is just a call away.

  • Identify Policy and Procedure Gaps (Calls 1-2)
    Assess current policies, operational challenges, and gaps. Mitigate significant risks first.
  • Create and Review Policies (Calls 2-4)
    Modify and review policy templates with an Info-Tech analyst.
  • Create and Review Procedures (Calls 4-6)
    Workflow procedures, using templates wherever possible. Review documentation best practices.

Contact Info-Tech to set up a Guided Implementation with a dedicated advisor who will walk you through every stage of your policy development project.

Develop Infrastructure & Operations Policies and Procedures

Phase 1

Identify Policy and Procedure Gaps

PHASE 1: Identify Policy and Procedure Gaps

Step 1.1: Review and right-size the existing policy set

This step will walk you through the following activities:

  • Identify gaps in your existing policy suite
  • Document challenges to core Infrastructure & Operations processes
  • Identify documentation that can close gaps
  • Prioritize your documentation effort

This step involves the following participants:

  • Infrastructure & Operations Manager
  • Infrastructure Supervisors

Results & Insights

  • Results: A review of the existing policy suite and identification of opportunities for improvement.
  • Insights: Not all gaps necessarily require a fresh policy. Repurpose, refresh, or supplement existing documentation wherever appropriate.

Conduct a policy review

Associated Activity icon 1(a) 30 minutes per policy

You’ve got time to review your policy suite. Make the most of it.

  1. Start with organizational requirements.
    • What initiatives are on the go? What policies or procedures do you have a mandate to create?
  2. Weed out expired and dated policies.
    • Gather your existing policies. Identify when each one was published or last reviewed.
    • Decide whether to retire, merge, or update expired or obviously dated policy.
  3. Review policy statements.
    • Check that the organization is adequately supporting policy statements with SOPs, standards, and guidelines. Ensure role-related information is up to date.
  4. Document and bring any gaps forward to the next activity. If no action is required, indicate that you have completed a review and submit the findings for approval.

But they just want one policy...

A review of your policy suite is good practice, especially when it hasn’t been done for a while. Why?
  • Existing policies may address what you’re trying to do with a new policy. Using or modifying an existing policy avoids overlap and contradiction and saves you the effort required to create, communicate, approve, and maintain a new policy.
  • Review the suite to validate that you’re addressing the most important challenges first.

Brainstorm improvements for core Infrastructure & Operations processes

Associated Activity icon 1(b) 1 hour

Supplement the list of gaps from your policy review with process challenges.

  1. Write out key Infra & Ops–related processes – one piece of flipchart paper per process. You can work through all of these processes or cherry-pick the processes you want to improve first.
  2. With participants, write out in point form how you currently execute on these processes (e.g. for Asset Management, you might be tagging hardware, tracking licenses, etc.)
  3. Work through a “Start – Stop – Continue” exercise. Ask participants: What should we start doing? What must we stop doing? What do we do currently that’s valuable and must continue? Write ideas on sticky notes.
  4. Once you’ve worked through the “Start – Stop – Continue” exercise for all processes, group similar suggestions for improvements.

Asset Management: Manage hardware and software assets across their lifecycle to protect assets and manage costs.

Availability and Capacity Management: Balance current and future availability, capacity, and performance needs with cost-to-serve.

Business Continuity Management: Continue operation of critical business processes and IT services.

Change Management: Deliver technical changes in a controlled manner.

Configuration Management: Define and maintain relationships between technical components.

Problem Management: Identify incident root cause.

Operations Management: Coordinate operations.

Release and Patch Management: Deliver updates and manage vulnerabilities in a controlled manner.

Service Desk: Respond to user requests and all incidents.

PHASE 1: Identify Policy and Procedure Gaps

Step 1.2: Create an action plan to address policy gaps

This step will walk you through the following activities:

  • Identify challenges and gaps that can be addressed via documentation
  • Prioritize high-value, high-risk gaps

This step involves the following participants:

  • Infrastructure & Operations Manager
  • Infrastructure Supervisors

Results & Insights

  • Results: An action plan to tackle policy and procedures gaps, aligned with business requirements and business value.
  • Insights: Not all documentation is equally valuable. Prioritize documentation that delivers value and mitigates risk.

Support policies with procedures, standards, and guidelines

Use a working definition for each type of document.

Policy: Directives, rules, and mandates that support the overarching, long-term goals of the organization.

  • Standards: Prescriptive, uniform requirements.
  • Procedures: Specific, detailed, step-by-step instructions for completing a task.
  • Guidelines: Non-enforceable, recommended best practices.

Info-Tech Best Practice

Take advantage of your Info-Tech advisory membership by scheduling review sessions with an analyst. We provide high-level feedback to ensure your documentation is clear, concise, and consistent and aligns with the governance objectives you’ve identified.

Answer the following questions to decide if governance documentation can help close gaps

Associated Activity icon 1(c) 30 minutes

Documentation supports knowledge sharing, process consistency, compliance, and transparency. Ask the following questions:

  1. What is the purpose of the documentation?
    Procedures support task completion. Policies set direction and manage organizational risk.
  2. Should it be enforceable?
    Policies and standards are enforceable; guidelines are not. Procedures are enforceable in that they should support policy enforcement.
  3. What is the scope?
    To document a task, create a procedure. Set overarching rules with policies. Use standards and guidelines to set detailed rules and best practices.
  4. What’s the expected cadence for updates?
    Policies should be revisited and revised less frequently than procedures.

Info-Tech Best Practice

Reinvent the wheel? I don’t think so!

Always check to see if a gap can be addressed with existing tools before drafting a new policy

  • Is there an existing policy that could be supported with new or updated procedures, technical standards, or guidelines?
  • Is there a technical control you can deploy that would enforce the terms of an existing, approved policy?
  • It may be simpler to amend an existing policy instead of creating a new one.

Some problems can’t be solved by better documentation (or by documentation alone). Consider additional strategies that address people, process, and technology.

Tackle high-value, high-risk gaps first

Associated Activity icon 1(d) 30 minutes

Prioritize your documentation effort.

  1. List each proposed piece of documentation on the board.
  2. Assign a score to the risk posed to the business by the lack of documentation and to the expected benefit of completing the documentation. Use a scoring scale between 1 and 3 such as the one on the right.
  3. Prioritize documentation that mitigates risks and maximizes benefits.
  4. If you need to break ties, consider effort required to develop, implement, and enforce policies or procedures.

Example Scoring Scale

Score Business risk of missing documentation Business benefit of value of documentation

1

Low: Affects ad hoc activities or non-critical data. Low: Minimal impact.

2

Moderate: Impacts productivity or internal goodwill. Moderate: Required periodically; some cross-training opportunities.

3

High: Impacts revenue, safety, or external goodwill. High: Save time for common or ongoing processes; extensive improvement to training/knowledge transfer.

Info-Tech Insight

Documentation pulls resources away from other important programs and projects, so ultimately it must be a demonstrably higher priority than other work. This exercise is designed to align documentation efforts with business goals.

Phase 1: Review accomplishments

Policy pillars: Standards, Procedures, Guidelines

Summary of Accomplishments

  • Identified gaps in the existing policy suite and identified pain points in existing Infra & Ops processes.
  • Developed a list of policies and procedures that can address existing gaps and prioritized the documentation effort.

Develop Infrastructure & Operations Policies and Procedures

Phase 2

Develop Policies

PHASE 2: Develop Policies

Step 2.1: Modify policy templates and gather feedback

This step will walk you through the following activities:

  • Modify policy templates

This step involves the following participants:

  • Infrastructure & Operations Manager
  • Technical Writer

Results & Insights

  • Results: Your own COBIT-aligned policies built by modifying Info-Tech templates.
  • Insights: Effective policies are easy to read and navigate.

Write Good-er: Be Clear, Consistent, and Concise

Effective policies adhere to the three Cs of documentation.

  1. Be clear. Make it as easy as possible for a user to learn how to comply with your policy.
  2. Be consistent. Write policies that complement each other, not contradict each other.
  3. Be concise. Make it as quick and easy as possible to read and understand your policy.

Info-Tech Best Practice

To download the full suite of templates all at once, click the “Download Research” button on the research landing page on the website.

Use the three Cs: Be Clear

Understanding makes compliance possible. Create policy with the goal of making compliance as easy as possible. Use positive, simple language to convey your intentions and rationale to your audience. Staff will make an effort adhere to your policy when they understand the need and are able to comply with the terms.

  1. Choose a skilled writer. Select a writer who can write clearly and succinctly.
  2. Default to simple language and define key terms. Define scope and key terms upfront. Avoid using technical terms outside of technical documentation; if they’re necessary be sure to define them as well.
  3. Use active, positive language. Where possible, tell people what they can do, not what they can’t.
  4. Keep the structure simple. Complicated documents are less likely to be understood and read. Use short sentences and paragraphs. Lists are a helpful way to summarize important information. Guide your reader through the document with appropriately named section headers, tables of contents, and numeration.
  5. Add a process for handling exceptions. Refer to procedures, standards, and guidelines documentation. Try to keep these links as static as possible. Also, refer to a process for handling exceptions.
  6. Manage the integrity of electronic documents. When published electronically, the policy should have restricted editing access or should be published in a non-editable format. Access to the procedure and policy storage database for employees should be read-only.

Info-Tech Insight

Highly effective policies are easy to navigate. Your policies should be “skimmable.” Very few people will fully read a policy before accepting it. Make it easy to navigate so the reader can easily find the policy statements that apply to them.

Use the three Cs: Be Consistent

Ensure that policies are aligned with other organizational policies and procedures. It detracts from compliance if different policies prescribe different behavior in the same situation. Moreover, your policies should reflect the corporate culture and other company standards. Use your policies to communicate rules and get employees aligned with how your company works.

  1. Use standard sentences and paragraphs. Policies are usually expressed in short, standard sentences. Lists should also be used when necessary or appropriate.
  2. Remember the three Ws. When writing a policy, always be sure to clearly state what the rule is, when it should be applied, and who needs to follow it. Policies should clearly define their scope of application and whether directives are mandatory or recommended.
  3. Use an outline format. Using a numbered or outline format will make a document easier to read and will make content easier to look up when referring back to the document at a later time.
  4. Avoid amendments. Avoid the use of information that is quickly outdated and requires regular amendment (e.g. names of people).
  5. Reference a set of supplementary documents. Codify your tactics outside of the policy document, but make reference to them within the text. This makes it easier to ensure consistency in the behavior prescribed by your policies.

"One of the issues is the perception that policies are rules and regulations. Instead, your policies should be used to say ‘this is the way we do things around here.’" (Mike Hughes CISA CGEIT CRISC, Principal Director, Haines-Watts GRC)

Use the three Cs: Be Concise

Reading and understanding policies shouldn’t be challenging, and it shouldn’t significantly detract from productive time. Long policies are more difficult to read and understand, increasing the work required for employees to comply with them. Put it this way: How often do you read the Terms and Conditions of software you’ve installed before accepting them?

  1. Be direct. The quicker you get to the point, the easier it is for the reader to interpret and comply with your policy.
  2. Your policy is a rule, not a recipe. Your policy should outline what needs to be accomplished and why – your standards, guidelines, and SOPs address the how.
  3. Keep policies short. Nobody wants to read a huge policy book, so keep your policies short.
  4. Use additional documentation where needed. In addition to making consistency easier, this shortens the length of your policies, making them easier to read.
  5. Policy still too large? Modularize it. If you have an extremely large policy, it’s likely that it’s too widely scoped or that you’re including statements that should be part of procedure documentation. Consider breaking your policy into smaller, focused, more digestible documents.

"If the policy’s too large, people aren’t going to read it. Why read something that doesn’t apply to me?" (Carole Fennelly, Owner and Principal, cFennelly Consulting)

"I always try to strike a good balance between length and prescriptiveness when writing policy. Your policies … should be short and describe the problem and your approach to solving it. Below policies, you write standards, guidelines, and SOPs." (Michael Deskin, Policy and Technical Writer, Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission)

Customize policy documents

Associated Activity icon 2(a) 1-2 hours per policy

Use the policies templates to support key Infrastructure & Operations programs.

INPUT: List of prioritized policies

OUTPUT: Written policy drafts ready for review

Materials: Policy templates

Participants: Policy writer, Signing authority

No policy template will be a perfect fit for your organization. Use Info-Tech’s research to develop your organization’s program requirements. Customize the policy templates to support those requirements.

  1. Work through policies from highest to lowest priority as defined in Phase 1.
  2. Follow the instructions written in grey text to customize the policy. Follow the three Cs when you write your policy.
  3. When your draft is finished, prepare to request signoff from your signing authority by reviewing the draft with an Info-Tech analyst.
  4. Complete the highest ranked three or four draft policies. Review all these policies with relevant stakeholders and include all relevant signing authorities in the signoff process.
  5. Rinse and repeat. Iterate until all relevant polices are complete.

Request, Incident, and Problem Management

An effective, timely service desk correlates with higher overall end-user satisfaction across all other IT services. (Info-Tech Research Group, 2016 (N=25,998))

An icon for the 'DSS02 Service Desk' template. An icon for the 'DSS03 Incident and Problem Management' template.

Use the following template to create a policy that outlines the goals and mandate for your service and support organization:

  • IT Triage and Support Policy

Support the program and associated policy statements using Info-Tech’s research:

  • Standardize the Service Desk
  • Incident and Problem Management
  • Design & Build a User-Facing Service Catalog

Embrace Standardization

  • Outline the support and service mandate with the policy. Support the policy with the methodology in Info-Tech’s research.
  • Over time, organizations without standardized processes face confusion, redundancies, and cost overruns. Standardization avoids wasting energy and effort building new solutions to solved issues.
  • Standard processes for IT services define repeatable approaches to work and sandbox creative activities.
  • Create tickets for every task and categorize them using a standard classification system. Use the resulting data to support root-cause analysis and long-term trend management.
  • Create a single point of contact for users for all incidents and requests. Escalate and resolve tickets faster.
  • Empower end users and technicians with knowledge bases that help them solve problems without intervention.

Change, Release, and Patch Management

Slow turnaround, unauthorized changes, and change-related incidents are all too familiar to many managers.

An icon for the 'BAI06 Change Management' template. An icon for the 'BAI07 Release Management' template.

Use the following templates to create policies that define effective patch, release, and change management:

  • Change Management Policy
  • Release and Patch Management Policy
  • Change Control – Freezes & Risk Evaluation Policy

Ensure the policy is supported by using the following Info-Tech research:

  • Optimize Change Management

Embrace Change

  • IT system owners resist change management when they see it as slow and bureaucratic.
  • At the same time, an increasingly interlinked technical environment may cause issues to appear in unexpected places. Configuration management systems are often not kept up to date, so preventable conflicts get missed.
  • No process exists to support the identification and deployment of critical security patches. Tracking down users to find a maintenance window takes significant, dedicated effort and intervention from the management team.
  • Create a unified change management process that reduces risk and is balanced in its approach toward deploying changes, while also maintaining throughput of patches, fixes, enhancements, and innovation.

IT Asset Management (ITAM)

A proactive, dynamic ITAM program will pay dividends in support, contract management, appropriate provisioning, and more.

An icon for the 'BAI09 Asset Management' template.

Start by outlining the requirements for effective asset management:

  • Hardware Asset Management Policy
  • Software Asset Management Policy

Support ITAM policies with the following Info-Tech research:

  • Implement IT Asset Management

Leverage Asset Data

  • Create effective, directional policies for your asset management program that provide a mandate for action. Support the policies with robust procedures, capable staff, and right-fit technology solutions.
  • Poor management of assets generally leads to higher costs due to duplicated purchases, early replacement, loss, and so on.
  • Visibility into asset location and ownership improves security and accountability.
  • A centralized repository of asset data supports request fulfilment and incident management.
  • Asset management is an ongoing program, not a one-off project, and must be resourced accordingly. Organizations often implement an asset management program and let it stagnate.

"Many of the large data breaches you hear about… nobody told the sysadmin the client data was on that server. So they weren’t protecting and monitoring it." (Carole Fennelly, Owner and Principal, cFennelly Consulting)

Business Continuity Management (BCM)

Streamline the traditional approach to make BCM practical and repeatable.

An icon for the 'DSS04 DR and Business Continuity' template.

Set the direction and requirements for effective BCM:

  • Business Continuity Management Policy

Support the BCM policy with the following Info-Tech research:

  • Create a Right-Sized Disaster Recovery Plan
  • Develop a Business Continuity Plan

Build Organizational Resilience

  • Evidence of disaster recovery and business continuity planning is increasingly required to comply with regulations, mitigate business risk, and meet customer demands.
  • IT leaders are often asked to take the lead on business continuity, but overall accountability for business continuity rests with the board of directors, and each business unit must create and maintain its business continuity plan.
  • Set an organizational mandate for BCM with the policy.
  • Divide the business continuity mandate into manageable parcels of work. Follow Info-Tech’s practical methodology to tackle key disaster recovery and business continuity planning activities one at a time.

Info-Tech Best Practice

Governance goals must be supported with effective, well-aligned procedures and processes. Use Info-Tech’s research to support the key Infrastructure & Operations processes that enable your business to create value.

Availability, Capacity, and Operations Management

What was old is new again. Use time-tested techniques to manage and plan cloud capacity and costs.

An icon for the 'BAI04 Availability and Capacity Management' template. An icon for the 'DSS01 Operations Management' template. An icon for the 'BAI10 Configuration Management' template.

Set the direction and requirements for effective availability and capacity management:

  • Availability and Capacity Management Policy
  • System Maintenance Policy – NIST

Support the policy with the following Info-Tech research:

  • Develop an Availability and Capacity Management Plan
  • Improve IT Operations Management
  • Develop an IT Infrastructure Services Playbook

Mature Service Delivery

  • Hybrid IT deployments – managing multiple locations, delivery models, and service providers – are the future of IT. Hybrid deployments significantly complicate capacity planning and operations management.
  • Effective operations management practices develop structured processes to automate activities and increase process consistency across the IT organization, ultimately improving IT efficiency.
  • Trying to add mature service delivery can feel like playing whack-a-mole. Systematically improve your service capabilities using the tactical, iterative approach outlined in Improve IT Operations Management.

Enhance your overall security posture with a defensible, prescriptive policy suite

Align your security policy suite with NIST Special Publication 800-171.

Security policies support the organization’s larger security program. We’ve created a dedicated research blueprint and a set of templates that will help you build security policies around a robust framework.

  • Start with a security charter that aligns the security program with organizational objectives.
  • Prioritize security policies that address significant risks.
  • Work with technical and business stakeholders to adapt Info-Tech’s NIST SP 800-171–aligned policy templates (at right) to reflect your organizational objectives.

A diagram listing all the different elements in a 'Security Charter': 'Access Control', 'Audit & Acc.', 'Awareness and Training', 'Config. Mgmt.', 'Identification and Auth.', 'Incident Response', 'Maintenance', 'Media Protection', 'Personnel Security', 'Physical Protection', 'Risk Assessment', 'Security Assessment', 'System and Comm. Protection', and 'System and Information Integrity'.

Review and download Info-Tech's blueprint Develop and Deploy Security Policies.

Info-Tech Best Practice

Customize Info-Tech’s policy framework to align your policy suite to NIST SP 800-171. Given NIST’s requirements for the control of confidential information, organizations that align their policies to NIST standards will be in a strong governance position.

PHASE 2: Develop Policies

Step 2.2: Implement, enforce, measure, and maintain new policies

This step will walk you through the following activities:

  • Gather stakeholder feedback
  • Identify preventive and detective controls
  • Identify required supports
  • Seek policy approval
  • Establish roles and responsibilities for policy maintenance

This step involves the following participants:

  • Infrastructure & Operations Manager
  • Infrastructure Supervisors
  • Technical Writer
  • Policy Stakeholders

Results & Insights

  • Results: Well-supported policies that have received signoff.
  • Insights: If you’re not prepared to enforce the policy, you might not actually need a policy. Use the policy statements as guidelines or standards, create and implement procedures, and build a culture of compliance. Once you can confidently execute on required controls, seek signoff.

Gather feedback from users to assess the feasibility of the new policies

Associated Activity icon 2(b) Review period: 1-2 weeks

Once the policies are drafted, roundtable the drafts with stakeholders.

INPUT: Draft policies

OUTPUT: Reviewed policy drafts ready for approval

Materials: Policy drafts

Participants: Policy stakeholders

  1. Form a test group of users who will be affected by the policy in different ways. Keep the group to around five staff.
  2. Present new policies to the testers. Allow them to read the documents and attempt to comply with the new policies in their daily routines.
  3. Collect feedback from the group.
    • Consider using interviews, email surveys, chat channels, or group discussions.
    • Solicit ideas on how policy statements could be improved or streamlined.
  4. Make reasonable changes to the first draft of the policies before submitting them for approval. Policies will only be followed if they’re realistic and user friendly.

Info-Tech Best Practice

Allow staff the opportunity to provide input on policy development. Giving employees a say in policy development helps avoid obstacles down the road. This is especially true if you’re trying to change behavior rather than lock it in.

Develop mechanisms for monitoring and enforcement

Associated Activity icon 2(c) 20 minutes per policy

Brainstorm preventive and detective controls.

INPUT: Draft policies

OUTPUT: Reviewed policy drafts ready for approval

Materials: Policy drafts

Participants: Policy stakeholders

Preventive controls are designed to discourage or pre-empt policy breaches before they occur. Training, approvals processes, and segregation of duties are examples of preventive controls. (Ohio University)

Detective controls help enforce the policy by identifying breaches after they occur. Forensic analysis and event log auditing are examples of detective controls. (Ohio University)

Not all policies require the same level of enforcement. Policies that are required by law or regulation generally require stricter enforcement than policies that outline best practices or organizational values.

Identify controls and enforcement mechanisms that are in line with policy requirements. Build control and enforcement into procedure documentation as needed.

Suggestions:

  1. Have staff sign off on policies. Disclose any monitoring/surveillance.
  2. Ensure consequences match the severity of the infraction. Document infractions and ensure that enforcement is applied consistently across all infractions.
  3. Automatic controls shouldn’t get in the way of people’s ability to do their jobs. Test controls with users before you roll them out widely.

Support the policy before seeking approval

A policy is only as strong as its supporting pillars.

Create Standards

Standards are requirements that support policy adherence. Server builds and images, purchase approval criteria, and vulnerability severity definitions can all be examples of standards that improve policy adherence.

Where reasonable, use automated controls to enforce standards. If you automate the control, consider how you’ll handle exceptions.

Create Guidelines

If no standards exist – or best practices can’t be monitored and enforced, as standards require – write guidelines to help users remain in compliance with the policy.

Create Procedures: We’ll cover procedure development and documentation in Phase 3.

Info-Tech Insight

In general, failing to follow or strictly enforce a policy creates a risk for the business. If you’re not confident a policy will be followed or enforced, consider using policy statements as guidelines or standards as an interim measure as you update procedures and communicate and roll out changes that support adherence and enforcement.

Seek approval and communicate the policy

Policies ultimately need to be accepted by the business.

  • Once the drafts are completed, identify who is in charge of approving the policies.
  • Ensure all stakeholders understand the importance, context, and repercussions of the policies.
  • The approvals process is about appropriate oversight of the drafted policies. For example:
    • Do the policies satisfy compliance and regulatory requirements?
    • Do the policies work with the corporate culture?
    • Do the policies address the underlying need?

If the draft is rejected:

  • Acquire feedback and make revisions.
  • Resubmit for approval.

If the draft is approved:

  • Set the effective date and a review date.
  • Begin communication, training, and implementation.
  • Employees must know that there are new policies and understand the steps they must take to comply with the policies in their work.
  • Employees must be able to interpret, understand, and know how to act upon the information they find in the policies.
  • Employees must be informed on where to get help or ask questions and from whom to request policy exceptions.

"A lot of board members and executive management teams… don’t understand the technology and the risks posed by it." (Carole Fennelly, Owner and Principal, cFennelly Consulting)

Identify policy management roles and responsibilities

Associated Activity icon 2(d) 30 minutes

Discuss and assign roles and responsibilities for ongoing policy management.

Role

Responsibilities

Executive sponsor

  • Supports the program at the highest levels of the business, as needed
  • Program lead

  • Leads the Infrastructure & Operations policy management program
  • Identifies and communicates status updates to the executive sponsor and the project team
  • Coordinates business demands and interviews and organizes stakeholders to identify requirements
  • Manages the work team and coordinates policy rollout
  • Policy writer

  • Authors and updates policies based on requirements
  • Coordinates with outsourced editor for completion of written documents
  • IT infrastructure SMEs

  • Provide technical insight into capabilities and limitations of infrastructure systems
  • Provide advice on possible controls that can aid policy rollout, monitoring, and enforcement
  • Legal expert

  • Provides legal advice on the policy’s legal terms and enforceability
  • "Whether at the level of a government, a department, or a sub-organization: technology and policy expertise complement one another and must be part of the conversation." (Peter Sheingold, Portfolio Manager, Cybersecurity, MITRE Corporation)

    Phase 2: Review accomplishments

    Effective Policies: Clear, Consistent, and Concise

    An icon for the 'DSS02 Service Desk' template.

    An icon for the 'DSS03 Incident and Problem Management' template.

    An icon for the 'BAI06 Change Management' template.

    An icon for the 'BAI07 Release Management' template.

    An icon for the 'BAI09 Asset Management' template.

    An icon for the 'DSS04 DR and Business Continuity' template.

    An icon for the 'BAI04 Availability and Capacity Management' template.

    An icon for the 'DSS01 Operations Management' template.

    An icon for the 'BAI10 Configuration Management' template.

    Summary of Accomplishments

    • Built priority policies based on templates aligned with the IT Management & Governance Framework and COBIT 5.
    • Reviewed controls and policy supports.
    • Assigned roles and responsibilities for ongoing policy maintenance.

    Develop Infrastructure & Operations Policies and Procedures

    Phase 3

    Document Effective Procedures

    PHASE 3: Document Effective Procedures

    Step 3.1: Scope and outline procedures

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Prioritize SOP documentation
    • Draft workflows using a tabletop exercise
    • Modify templates, as applicable

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Infrastructure & Operations Manager
    • Technical Writer
    • Infrastructure Supervisors

    Results & Insights

    • Results: An action plan for SOP documentation and an outline of procedure workflows.
    • Insights: Don’t let tools get in the way of documentation – low-tech solutions are often the most effective way to build and analyze workflows.

    Prioritize your SOP documentation effort

    Associated Activity icon 3(a) 1-2 hours

    Build SOP documentation that gets used and doesn’t just check a box.

    1. Review the list of procedure gaps from Phase 1. Are any other procedures needed? Are some of the procedures now redundant?
    2. Establish the scope of the proposed procedures. Who are the stakeholders? What policies do they support?
    3. Run a basic prioritization exercise using a three-point scale. Higher scores mean greater risks or greater benefits. Score the risk of the undocumented procedure to the business (e.g. potential effect on data, productivity, goodwill, health and safety, or compliance). Score the benefit to the business of documenting the procedure (e.g. throughput improvements or knowledge transfer).
    4. Different procedures require different formats. Decide on one or more formats that can help you effectively document the procedure:
      • Flowcharts: Depict workflows and decision points. Provide an at-a-glance view that is easy to follow. Can be supported by checklists and diagrams where more detail is required.
      • Checklists: A reminder of what to do, rather than how to do it. Keep instructions brief.
      • Diagrams: Visualize objects, topologies, and connections for reference purposes.
      • Tables: Establish relationships between related categories.
      • Prose: Use full-text instructions where other documentation strategies are insufficient.

    Modify the following Info-Tech templates for larger SOPs

    Support these processes...

    ...with these blueprints...

    ...to create SOPs using these templates.

    An icon for the 'DSS04 DR and Business Continuity' template. Create a Right-Sized Disaster Recovery Plan DRP Summary
    An icon for the 'BAI09 Asset Management' template. Implement IT Asset Management HAM SOP and SAM SOP
    An icon for the 'BAI06 Change Management' template. An icon for the 'BAI07 Release Management' template. Optimize Change Management Change Management SOP
    An icon for the 'DSS02 Service Desk' template. An icon for the 'DSS03 Incident and Problem Management' template. Standardize the Service Desk Service Desk SOP

    Use tabletop planning or whiteboards to draft workflows

    Associated Activity icon 3(b) 30 minutes

    Tabletop planning is a paper-based exercise in which your team walks through a particular process and maps out what happens at each stage.

    OUTPUT: Steps in the current process for one SOP

    Materials: Tabletop, pen, and cue cards

    Participants: Process owners, SMEs

    1. For this exercise, choose one particular process to document.
    2. Document each step of the process on cue cards, which can be arranged on the table in sequence.
    3. Be sure to include task ownership in your steps.
    4. Map out the process as it currently happens – we’ll think about how to improve it later.
    5. Keep focused. Stay on task and on time.

    Example:

    • Step 3: PM reviews new defects daily
    • Step 4: PM assigns defects to tech leads
    • Step 5: Assigned resource updates status – frequency is based on ticket priority

    Info-Tech Insight

    Don’t get weighed down by tools. Relying on software or other technological tools can detract from the exercise. Use simple tools such as cue cards to record steps so that you can easily rearrange steps or insert steps based on input from the group.

    Collaborate to optimize the SOP

    Associated Activity icon 3(c) 30 minutes

    Review the tabletop exercise. What gaps exist in current processes?
    How can the processes be made better? What are the outputs and checkpoints?

    OUTPUT: Identify steps to optimize the SOP

    Materials: Tabletop, pen, and cue cards

    Participants: Process owners, SMEs

    Example:

    • Step 3: PM reviews new defects daily
    • NEW STEP: Schedule 10-minute daily defect reviews with PM and tech leads to evaluate ticket priority
    • Step 4: PM assigns defects to tech leads
    • Step 5: Assigned resource updates status – frequency is based on ticket priority
      • Step 5 Subprocess: Ticket status update
      • Step 5 Output: Ticket status moved to OPEN by assigned resource – acknowledges receipt by assigned resource

    A note on colors: Use white cards to record steps. Record gaps on yellow cards (e.g. a process step not documented) and risks on red cards (e.g. only one person knows how to execute a step) to highlight your gaps/to-dos and risks to be mitigated or accepted.

    If it’s necessary to clarify complex process flows during the exercise, you can also use green cards for decision diamonds, purple for document/report outputs, and blue for subprocesses.

    PHASE 3: Document Effective Procedures

    Step 3.2: Document effective procedures

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Document workflows, checklists, and diagrams
    • Establish a cadence for document review and updates

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Infrastructure Manager
    • Technical Writer

    Results & Insights

    • Results: Improved SOP documentation and document management practices.
    • Insights: It’s possible to keep up with changes if you put the right cues and accountabilities in place. Include document review in project and change management procedures and hold staff accountable for completion.

    Document workflows with flowcharting software

    Suggestions for workflow documentation

    • Whether you draft the workflow on a whiteboard or using cue cards, the first iteration is usually messy. Clean up the flow as you document the results of the exercise.
    • Make the workflow as simple as possible and no simpler. Eliminate any decision points that aren’t strictly necessary to complete the procedure.
    • Use standard flowchart shapes (see next slide).
    • Use links to connect to related documentation.
    • Review the documented workflow with participants.

    Download the following workflow examples:

    Establish flowcharting standards

    If you don’t have existing flowchart standards, then keep it simple and stick to basic flowcharting conventions as described below.

    Basic flowcharting convention: a circle can be used for 'Start, End, and Connector'. Start, End, and Connector: Traditional flowcharting standards reserve this shape for connectors to other flowcharts or other points in the existing flowchart. Unified Modeling Language (UML) also uses the circle for start and end points.
    Basic flowcharting convention: a rounded rectangle can be used for 'Start and End'. Start and End: Traditional flowcharting standards use this for start and end. However, Info-Tech recommends using the circle shape to reduce the number of shapes and avoid confusion with other similar shapes.
    Basic flowcharting convention: a rectangle can be used for 'Process Step'. Process Step: Individual process steps or activities (e.g. create ticket or escalate ticket). If it’s a series of steps, then use the subprocess symbol and flowchart the subprocess separately.
    Basic flowcharting convention: a rectangle with double-line on the ends can be used for 'Subprocess'. Subprocess: A series of steps. For example, a critical incident SOP might reference a recovery process as one of the possible actions. Marking it as a subprocess, rather than listing each step within the critical incident SOP, streamlines the flowchart and avoids overlap with other flowcharts (e.g. the recovery process).
    Basic flowcharting convention: a diamond can be used for 'Decision'. Decision: Represents decision points, typically with Yes/No branches, but you could have other branches depending on the question (e.g. a “Priority?” question could branch into separate streams for Priority 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 issues).
    Basic flowcharting convention: a rectangle with a wavy bottom can be used for 'Document/Report Output'. Document/Report Output: For example, the output from a backup process might include an error log.

    Support workflows with checklists and diagrams

    Diagrams

    • Diagrams are a visual representation of real-world phenomena and the connections between them.
    • Be sure to use standard shapes. Clearly label elements of the diagram. Use standard practices, including titles, dates, authorship, and versioning.
    • IT systems and interconnections are layered. Include physical, logical, protocol, and data flow connections.

    Examples:

    • XMPL Recovery Workflows
    • Workflow Library

    Checklists

    • Checklists are best used as short-form reminders on how to complete a particular task.
    • Remember the audience. If the process will be carried out by technical staff, there’s technical background material you won’t need to spell out in detail.

    Examples:

    • Employee Termination Process Checklist
    • XMPL Systems Recovery Playbook

    Establish a cadence for documentation review and maintenance

    Lock-in the work with strong document management practices.

    • Identify documentation requirements as part of project planning.
    • Require a manager or supervisor to review and approve SOPs.
    • Check documentation status as part of change management.
    • Hold staff accountable for documentation.

    "It isn’t unusual for us to see infrastructure or operations documentation that is wildly out of date. We’re talking months, even years. Often it was produced as one big effort and then not reliably maintained." (Gary Patterson, Consultant, Quorum Resources)

    Only a quarter of organizations update SOPs as needed

    A bar chart representing how often organizations update SOPs. Each option has two bars, one representing 'North America', the other representing 'Europe and Asia'. 'Never or rarely' is 11% in North America and 3% in Europe and Asia. 'Ad-hoc approach' is 38% in North America and 28% in Europe and Asia. 'For audits/annual reviews' is 33% in North America and 45% in Europe and Asia. 'As needed/via change management' is 18% in North America and 25% in Europe and Asia. Source: Info-Tech Research Group (N=104)

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Use Info-Tech’s research Create Visual SOP Documents to further evaluate document management practices and toolsets.

    Phase 3: Review accomplishments

    Workflow documentation: Cue cards into flowcharts

    Summary of Accomplishments

    • Identified priority procedures for documentation activities.
    • Created procedure documentation in the appropriate format and level of granularity to support Infra & Ops policies.
    • Published and maintained procedure documentation.

    Research contributors and experts

    Carole Fennelly, Owner
    cFennelly Consulting

    Picture of Carole Fennelly, Owner, cFennelly Consulting.

    Carole Fennelly provides pragmatic cyber security expertise to help organizations bridge the gap between technical and business requirements. She authored the Center for Internet Security (CIS) Solaris and Red Hat benchmarks, which are used globally as configuration standards to secure IT systems. As a consultant, Carole has defined security strategies, and developed policies and procedures to implement them, at numerous Fortune 500 clients. Carole is a Certified Information Security Manager (CISM), Certified Security Compliance Specialist (CSCS), and Certified HIPAA Professional (CHP).

    Marko Diepold, IT Audit Manager
    audit2advise

    Picture of Marko Diepold, IT Audit Manager, audit2advise.

    Marko is an IT Audit Manager at audit2advise, where he delivers audit, risk advisory, and project management services. He has worked as a Security Officer, Quality Manager, and Consultant at some of Germany’s largest companies. He is a CISA and is ITIL v3 Intermediate and ITGCP certified.

    Research contributors and experts

    Martin Andenmatten, Founder & Managing Director
    Glenfis AG

    Picture of Martin Andenmatten, Founder and Managing Director, Glenfis AG.

    Martin is a digital transformation enabler who has been involved in various fields of IT for more than 30 years. At Glenfis, he leads large Governance and Service Management projects for various customers. Since 2002, he has been the course manager for ITIL® Foundation, ITIL® Service Management, and COBIT training. He has published two books on ISO 20000 and ITIL.

    Myles F. Suer, CIO Chat Facilitator
    CIO.com/Dell Boomi

    Picture of Myles F. Suer, CIO Chat Facilitator, CIO.com/Dell Boomi.

    Myles Suer, according to LeadTails, is the number 9 influencer of CIOs. He is also the facilitator for the CIOChat, which has executive-level participants from around the world in such industries as banking, insurance, education, and government. Myles is also the Industry Solutions Marketing Manager at Dell Boomi.

    Research contributors and experts

    Peter Sheingold, Portfolio Manager
    Cybersecurity, Homeland Security Center, The MITRE Corporation

    Picture of Peter Sheingold, Portfolio Manager, Cybersecurity, Homeland Security Center, The MITRE Corporation.

    Peter leads tasks that involve collaboration with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) sponsors and MITRE colleagues and connect strategy, policy, organization, and technology. He brings a deep background in homeland security and strategic analysis to his work with DHS in the immigration, border security, and cyber mission spaces. Peter came to MITRE in 2005 but has worked with DHS from its inception.

    Robert D. Austin, Professor
    Ivey Business School

    Picture of Robert D. Austin, Professor, Ivey Business School.

    Dr. Austin is a professor of Information Systems at Ivey Business School and an affiliated faculty member at Harvard Medical School. Before his appointment at Ivey, he was a professor of Innovation and Digital Transformation at Copenhagen Business School, and, before that, a professor of Technology and Operations Management at the Harvard Business School.

    Research contributors and experts

    Ron Jones, Director of IT Infrastructure and Service Management
    DATA Communications

    Picture of Ron Jones, Director of IT Infrastructure and Service Management, DATA Communications.

    Ron is a senior IT leader with over 20 years of management experiences from engineering to IT Service Management and operations support. He is known for joining organizations and leading enhanced process efficiency and has improved software, hardware, infrastructure, and operations solution delivery and support. Ron has worked for global and Canadian firms including BlackBerry, DoubleClick, Cogeco, Infusion, Info-Tech Research Group, and Data Communications Management.

    Scott Genung, Executive Director of Networking, Infrastructure, and Service Operations
    University of Chicago

    Picture of Scott Genung, Executive Director of Networking, Infrastructure, and Service Operations, University of Chicago.

    Scott is an accomplished IT executive with 26 years of experience in technical and leadership roles. In his current role, Scott provides strategic leadership, vision, and oversight for an IT portfolio supporting 31,000 users consisting of services utilized by campuses located in North America, Asia, and Europe; oversees the University’s Command Center; and chairs the UC Cyberinfrastructure Alliance (UCCA), a group of research IT providers that collectively deliver services to the campus and partners.

    Research contributors and experts

    Steve Weil, CISSP, CISM, CRISC, Information Security Director, Cybersecurity Principal Consultant
    Point B

    Picture of Steve Weil, CISSP, CISM, CRISC, Information Security Director, Cybersecurity Principal Consultant, Point B.

    Steve has 20 years of experience in information security design, implementation, and assessment. He has provided information security services to a wide variety of organizations, including government agencies, hospitals, universities, small businesses, and large enterprises. With his background as a systems administrator, security consultant, security architect, and information security director, Steve has a strong understanding of both the strategic and tactical aspects of information security. Steve has significant hands-on experience with security controls, operating systems, and applications. Steve has a master's degree in Information Science from the University of Washington.

    Tony J. Read, Senior Program/Project Lead & Interim IT Executive
    Read & Associates

    Picture of Tony J. Read, Senior Program/Project Lead and Interim IT Executive, Read and Associates.

    Tony has over 25 years of international IT leadership experience, within high tech, computing, telecommunications, finance, banking, government, and retail industries. Throughout his career, Tony has led and successfully implemented key corporate initiatives, contributing millions of dollars to the top and bottom line. He established Read & Associates in 2002, an international IT management and program/project delivery consultancy practice whose aim is to provide IT value-based solutions, realizing stakeholder economic value and network advantage. These key concepts are presented in his new book: The IT Value Network: From IT Investment to Stakeholder Value, published by J. Wiley, NJ.

    Related Info-Tech research

    • Develop and Deploy Security Policies
    • Develop an Availability and Capacity Management Plan
    • Improve IT Operations Management
    • Develop an IT Infrastructure Services Playbook
    • Create a Right-Sized Disaster Recovery Plan
    • Develop a Business Continuity Plan
    • Implement IT Asset Management
    • Optimize Change Management
    • Standardize the Service Desk
    • Incident and Problem Management
    • Design & Build a User-Facing Service Catalog

    Bibliography

    “About Controls.” Ohio University, ND. Web. 2 Feb 2018.

    England, Rob. “How to implement ITIL for a client?” The IT Skeptic. Two Hills Ltd, 4 Feb. 2010. Web. 2018.

    “Global Corporate IT Security Risks: 2013.” Kaspersky Lab, May 2013. Web. 2018.

    “Information Security and Technology Policies.” City of Chicago, Department of Innovation and Technology, Oct. 2014. Web. 2018.

    ISACA. COBIT 5: Enabling Processes. International Systems Audit and Control Association. Rolling Meadows, IL.: 2012.

    “IT Policy & Governance.” NYC Information Technology & Telecommunications, ND. Web. 2018.

    King, Paula and Kent Wada. “IT Policy: An Essential Element of IT Infrastructure”. EDUCAUSE Review. May-June 2001. Web. 2018.

    Luebbe, Max. “Simplicity.” Site Reliability Engineering. O’Reilly Media. 2017. Web. 2018.

    Swartout, Shawn. “Risk assessment, acceptance, and exception with a process view.” ISACA Charlotte Chapter September Event, 2013. Web. 2018.

    “User Guide to Writing Policies.” Office of Policy and Efficiency, University of Colorado, ND. Web. 2018.

    “The Value of Policies and Procedures.” New Mexico Municipal League, ND. Web. 2018.

    Determine Your Zero Trust Readiness

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}249|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.8/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $24,574 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 12 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Security Strategy & Budgeting
    • Parent Category Link: /security-strategy-and-budgeting

    CISOs pushing for zero trust as their security strategy face several challenges including:

    • Understanding and clarifying the benefits of zero trust for the organization.
    • The inability to verify all business operations are maintaining security best practices.
    • Convincing business units to add more security controls that go against the grain of reducing friction in workflows while still demonstrating these controls support the business.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Zero trust must benefit the business and security. Because the road to zero trust is an iterative process, IT security will need to constantly determine how different areas of zero trust will affect core business processes.
    • Zero trust reduces reliance on perimeter security. Zero trust is a strategy that solves how to move beyond the reliance on perimeter security and move controls to where the user accesses resources.
    • Not everyone can achieve zero trust, but everyone can adopt it. Zero trust will be different for every organization and may not be applicable in every control area. This means that zero trust is not a one-size-fits-all approach to IT security. Zero trust is the goal, but some organizations can only get so close to the ideal.

    Impact and Result

    Zero trust is a journey that uses multiple capabilities and requires multiple parties to contribute to an organization’s security. Use Info-Tech’s approach to:

    • Understand zero trust as a strategic platform for building your security roadmap.
    • Assess your current state and determine the benefits of adopting zero trust to help plan your roadmap.
    • Separate vendors from the hype surrounding zero trust to adopt a vendor-agnostic approach to your zero trust planning.

    Determine Your Zero Trust Readiness Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should determine your zero trust readiness, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Understand zero trust

    Recognize the zero trust ideal and understand the different zero trust schools of thought.

    2. Assess your zero trust readiness

    Assess and determine the benefits of zero trust and identify and evaluate vendors in the zero trust market.

    • Zero Trust Security Benefit Assessment Tool
    [infographic]

    Application Development Throughput

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}27|cart{/j2store}
    • Related Products: {j2store}27|crosssells{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Applications
    • Parent Category Link: /applications

    The challenge

    • As we work more and more using agile techniques, teams tend to optimize their areas of responsibility.
    • IT will still release lower-quality applications when there is a lack of clarity around the core SDLC processes.
    • Software development teams continue to struggle with budget and time constraints within their releases.
    • Typically each group claims to be optimized, yet the final deliverable falls short of the expected quality.

    Our advice

    Insight

    • Database administrators know this all too well: Optimizing can you perform worse. The software development lifecycle (SDLC) must be optimized holistically, not per area or team.
    • Separate how you work from your framework. You do not need "agile" or "extreme" or "agifall" or "safe" to optimize your SDLC.
    • SDLC optimization is a continuous effort. Start from your team's current capabilities and improve over time.

    Impact and results 

    • You can assume proper accountability for the implementation and avoid over-reliance on the systems integrator.
    • Leverage the collective knowledge and advice of additional IT professionals
    • Review the pitfalls and lessons learned from failed integrations.
    • Manage risk at every stage.
    • Perform a self-assessment at various stages of the integration path.

    The roadmap

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    Get started.

    Read our executive brief to understand our approach to SDLC optimization and why we advocate a holistic approach for your company.

    Document your current state

    This phase helps you understand your business goals and priorities. You will document your current SDLC process and find where the challenges are.

    • Create a Horizontally Optimized SDLC to Better Meet Business Demands – Phase 1: Document the Current State of the SDLC (ppt)
    • SDLC Optimization Playbook (xls)

    Find out the root causes, define how to move forward, and set your target state

    • Create a Horizontally Optimized SDLC to Better Meet Business Demands – Phase 2: Define Root Causes, Determine Optimization Initiatives, and Define Target State (ppt)

    Develop the roll-out strategy for SDLC optimization

    Prioritize your initiatives and formalize them in a roll-out strategy and roadmap. Communicate your plan to all your stakeholders.

    • Create a Horizontally Optimized SDLC to Better Meet Business Demands – Phase 3: Develop a Rollout Strategy for SDLC Optimization (ppt)
    • SDLC Communication Template (ppt)

     

    IT Project Management Lite

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}187|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Project Management Office
    • Parent Category Link: /project-management-office
    • Organizations want reliable project reporting and clear, consistent project management standards, but many are unwilling or unable to allocate time for it.
    • Many IT project managers are given project management responsibilities in addition to other full-time roles – without any formal allocation of time, authority, or training.
    • Most IT project managers and stakeholders actually want clear and consistent standards but resist tools and procedures they believe are too time consuming and inflexible.
    • Standard project management procedures must be “light” enough for project managers to adapt to a wide range of projects without increasing the total time required to manage projects successfully.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Most IT project management advice is focused on the largest 10-20% of projects – projects with large enough budgets to allocate time to project management. This leaves most IT projects (and most people who manage IT projects) in limbo between high-risk ad hoc management and high-cost project management best practices.
    • Project management success doesn’t equate to project success. While formal methodologies are a key ingredient in the success of large, complex projects, most IT projects do not require the same degree of rigorous record-keeping and planning.
    • Consistent, timely, and accurate reporting is the “linchpin” in any sustainable project and portfolio management practice.

    Impact and Result

    • Maintain timely and accurate project portfolio reporting with right-sized tools and processes.
    • Establish clear and consistent project management standards that make better use of time already spent managing projects.
    • Enable project managers to manage their projects more successfully with a set of flexible and lightweight tools and templates.

    IT Project Management Lite Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Assess the value of a minimum-viable PMO strategy

    Perform a measured value assessment for building and managing a minimum-viable PMO.

    • IT Project Management Lite Storyboard

    2. Perform a project and portfolio needs assessment

    Focus on the minimum required to maintain accuracy of portfolio reporting and effectiveness in managing projects.

    • Minimum-Viable PMO Needs Assessment

    3. Establish standards for realistic, accurate, and consistent portfolio reporting

    Emphasize reporting high-level project status as a way to identify and address issues to achieve the best results with the least effort.

    • Minimum-Viable Project and Portfolio Management SOP

    4. Create a standard, right-sized project management toolkit

    Free PMs to focus on actually managing the project while still delivering accurate portfolio metrics.

    • Zero-Allocation Project Management Workbook

    5. Train PMs for zero allocation

    Ensure project manager compliance with the portfolio reporting process by incorporating activities that create value.

    • Zero-Allocation Project Manager Development Plan
    • Zero-Allocation Project Management Survival Guide

    6. Perform a post-implementation assessment

    Evaluate success and identify opportunities for further improvement.

    Infographic

    Workshop: IT Project Management Lite

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Preparation

    The Purpose

    Define goals and success criteria.

    Finalize agenda.

    Gather information: update project and resource lists (Info-Tech recommends using the Project Portfolio Workbook).

    Key Benefits Achieved

    More efficiently organized and executed workshop.

    Able to better customize and tailor content to your specific needs.

    Activities

    1.1 Discuss specific pain points with regards to project manager allocations

    1.2 Review project lists, tools and templates, and other documents

    1.3 Map existing strategies to Info-Tech’s framework

    Outputs

    Understanding of where efforts must be focused in workshop

    Assessment of what existing tools and templates may need to be included in zero-allocation workbook

    Revisions that need to be made based on existing strategies

    2 Make the Case and Assess Needs

    The Purpose

    Assess current state (including review of project and resource lists).

    Discuss and analyze SWOT around project and portfolio management.

    Define target state.

    Define standards / SOP / processes for project and portfolio management.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Gain perspective on how well your processes match up with the amount of time your project managers have for their PM duties.

    Determine the value of the time and effort that your project teams are investing in project management activities.

    Begin to define resource optimized processes for zero-allocation project managers.

    Ensure consistent implementation of processes across your portfolio.

    Establish project discipline and best practices that are grounded in actual project capacity.

    Activities

    2.1 Perform and/or analyze Minimum-Viable PMO Needs Assessment

    2.2 SWOT analysis

    2.3 Identify target allocations for project management activities

    2.4 Begin to define resource optimized processes for zero-allocation project managers

    Outputs

    Current state analysis based on Minimum-Viable PMO Needs Assessment

    Overview of current strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats

    Target state analysis based on Minimum-Viable PMO Needs Assessment

    A refined Minimum-Viable Project and Portfolio Management SOP

    3 Establish Strategy

    The Purpose

    Select and customize project and portfolio management toolkit.

    Implement (test/pilot) toolkit and processes.

    Customize project manager training plan.

    Evaluate and refine toolkit and processes as needed.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Ensure consistent implementation of processes across your portfolio.

    Establish project discipline and best practices that are grounded in actual project capacity.

    A customized training session that will suit the needs of your project managers.

    Activities

    3.1 Customize the Zero-Allocation Toolkit to accommodate the needs of your projects

    3.2 Test toolkit on projects currently underway

    3.3 Tweak project manager training to suit the needs of your team

    Outputs

    Customized Zero-Allocation Project Management Workbook

    A tested and standardized copy of the workbook

    A customized training session for your project managers (to take place on Day 4 of Info-Tech’s workshop)

    4 Train Your Zero-Allocation Project Managers

    The Purpose

    Communicate project and portfolio management SOP to Project Managers.

    Deliver project manager training: standards for portfolio reporting and toolkit.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Equip project managers to improve their level of discipline and documentation without spending more time in record keeping and task management.

    Execute a successful training session that clearly and succinctly communicates your minimal and resource-optimized processes.

    Activities

    4.1 Project Manager Training, including communication of the processes and standard templates and reports that will be adopted by all project managers

    Outputs

    Educated and disciplined project managers, aware of the required processes for portfolio reporting

    5 Assess Strategy and Next Steps

    The Purpose

    Debrief from the training session.

    Plan for ongoing evaluation and improvement.

    Evaluate and refine toolkit and processes if needed.

    Answer any remaining questions.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Assess portfolio and project manager performance in light of the strategy implemented.

    Understanding of how to keep living documents like the workbook and SOP up to date.

    Clearly defined next steps.

    Activities

    5.1 Review the customized tools and templates

    5.2 Send relevant documentation to relevant stakeholders

    5.3 Schedule review call

    5.4 Schedule follow-up call with analysts to discuss progress in six months

    Outputs

    Finalized workbook and processes

    Satisfied and informed stakeholders

    Scheduled review call

    Scheduled follow-up call

    Create a Horizontally Optimized SDLC to Better Meet Business Demands

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}149|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Development
    • Parent Category Link: /development
    • While teams are used to optimizing their own respective areas of responsibility, there is lack of clarity on the overall core SDLC process resulting in applications being released that are of poor quality.
    • Software development teams are struggling to release on time and within budget.
    • Teams do not understand the overall process, are not communicating well, and traceability is hard to achieve.
    • Each team claims to be optimized yet the final deliverable doesn’t reflect the expected quality.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Optimizing can make you worse. One cannot just optimize locally – the SDLC must be optimized in its entirety to ensure traceability across the process.
    • Separate process from framework.
      You don’t need to “Go Agile” or follow other industry jargon to effectively optimize your SDLC.
    • SDLC process improvement is ongoing.
      Start with your team’s current capabilities and optimize. You should set expectations that new improvements will always come in the future.

    Impact and Result

    • Use a systematic framework to bring out local optimizations as potential candidates for SDLC optimization.
    • Prioritize those candidates that will aid in optimizing the overall core SDLC process.
    • Create the necessary governance and control structures to sustain the changes.
    • Use Info-Tech tools and templates to accelerate your process optimization.

    Create a Horizontally Optimized SDLC to Better Meet Business Demands Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read this Executive Brief to understand Info-Tech's approach to SDLC optimization and why the SDLC must be optimized in its entirety to ensure traceability across the process.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Document the current state of the SDLC

    This phase of the blueprint will help in understanding the organization's business priorities, documenting the current SDLC process, and identifing current SDLC challenges.

    • Create a Horizontally Optimized SDLC to Better Meet Business Demands – Phase 1: Document the Current State of the SDLC
    • SDLC Optimization Playbook

    2. Define root causes, determine optimization initiatives, and define target state

    This phase of the blueprint, will help with defining root causes, determining potential optimization initiatives, and defining the target state of the SDLC.

    • Create a Horizontally Optimized SDLC to Better Meet Business Demands – Phase 2: Define Root Causes, Determine Optimization Initiatives, and Define Target State

    3. Develop a rollout strategy for SDLC optimization

    This phase of the blueprint will help with prioritizing initiatives in order to develop a rollout strategy, roadmap, and communication plan for the SDLC optimization.

    • Create a Horizontally Optimized SDLC to Better Meet Business Demands – Phase 3: Develop a Rollout Strategy for SDLC Optimization
    • SDLC Communication Template
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Create a Horizontally Optimized SDLC to Better Meet Business Demands

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Document Your Current SDLC

    The Purpose

    Understand SDLC current state.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Understanding of your current SDLC state and metrics to measure the success of your SDLC optimization initiative.

    Activities

    1.1 Document the key business objectives that your SDLC delivers upon.

    1.2 Document your current SDLC process using a SIPOC process map.

    1.3 Identify appropriate metrics in order to track the effectiveness of your SDLC optimization.

    1.4 Document the current state process flow of each SDLC phase.

    1.5 Document the control points and tools used within each phase.

    Outputs

    Documented business objectives

    Documented SIPOC process map

    Identified metrics to measure the effectiveness of your SDLC optimization

    Documented current state process flows of each SDLC phase

    Documented control points and tools used within each SDLC phase

    2 Assess Challenges and Define Root Causes

    The Purpose

    Understand current SDLC challenges and root causes.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Understand the core areas of your SDLC that require optimization.

    Activities

    2.1 Identify the current challenges that exist within each SDLC phase.

    2.2 Determine the root cause of the challenges that exist within each SDLC phase.

    Outputs

    Identified current challenges

    Identified root causes of your SDLC challenges

    3 Determine Your SDLC Optimization Initiatives

    The Purpose

    Understand common best practices and the best possible optimization initiatives to help optimize your current SDLC.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Understand the best ways to address your SDLC challenges.

    Activities

    3.1 Define optimization initiatives to address the challenges in each SDLC phase.

    Outputs

    Defined list of potential optimization initiatives to address SDLC challenges

    4 Define SDLC Target State

    The Purpose

    Define your SDLC target state while maintaining traceability across your overall SDLC process.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Understand what will be required to reach your optimized SDLC.

    Activities

    4.1 Determine the target state of your SDLC.

    4.2 Determine the people, tools, and control points necessary to achieve your target state.

    4.3 Assess the traceability between phases to ensure a seamlessly optimized SDLC.

    Outputs

    Determined SDLC target state

    Identified people, processes, and tools necessary to achieve target state

    Completed traceability alignment map and prioritized list of initiatives

    5 Prioritize Initiatives and Develop Rollout Strategy

    The Purpose

    Define how you will reach your target state.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Create a plan of action to achieve your desired target state.

    Activities

    5.1 Gain the full scope of effort required to implement your SDLC optimization initiatives.Gain the full scope of effort required to implement your SDLC optimization initiatives.

    5.2 Identify the enablers and blockers of your SDLC optimization.

    5.3 Define your SDLC optimization roadmap.

    5.4 Create a communication plan to share initiatives with the business.

    Outputs

    Level of effort required to implement your SDLC optimization initiatives

    Identified enablers and blockers of your SDLC optimization

    Defined optimization roadmap

    Completed communication plan to present your optimization strategy to stakeholders

    Enable Organization-Wide Collaboration by Scaling Agile

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}174|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 8.3/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $12,989 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 10 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Architecture & Strategy
    • Parent Category Link: /architecture-and-strategy
    • Your organization is realizing benefits from adopting Agile principles and practices in pockets of your organization.
    • You are starting to investigate opportunities to extend Agile beyond these pilot implementations into other areas of the organization. You are looking for a coordinated approach aligned to business priorities.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Not all lessons from a pilot project are transferable. Pilot processes are tailored to a specific project’s scope, team, and tools, and they may not account for the diverse attributes in your organization.
    • Control may be necessary for coordination. More moving parts means enforcing consistent cadences, reporting, and communication is a must if teams are not disciplined or lack good governance.
    • Scale Agile in departments tolerable to change. Incrementally roll Agile out in departments where its principles are accepted (e.g. a culture of continuous improvement, embracing failures as lessons).

    Impact and Result

    • Complete an Agile capability assessment of your pilot functional group to gauge anticipated Agile benefits. Identify the business objectives and the group drivers that are motivating a scaled Agile implementation.
    • Understand the challenges that you may face when scaling Agile. Investigate the root causes of inefficiencies that can derail your scaling initiatives.
    • Brainstorm solutions to your scaling challenges and envision a target state for your growing Agile environment. Your target state will discover new opportunities to drive more business value and eliminate current activities driving down productivity.
    • Coordinate the implementation and execution of scaling Agile initiatives with a Scaling Agile Playbook. This organic and collaborative document will lay out the process, roles, goals, and objectives needed to successfully manage your Agile environment.

    Enable Organization-Wide Collaboration by Scaling Agile Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should scale up Agile, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Gauge readiness to scale up Agile

    Evaluate the readiness of the pilot functional group and Agile development processes to adopt scaled Agile practices.

    • Enable Organization-Wide Collaboration by Scaling Agile – Phase 1: Gauge Readiness to Scale Up Agile
    • Scaling Agile Playbook Template
    • Scrum Development Process Template

    2. Define scaled Agile target state

    Alleviate scaling issues and risks and introduce new opportunities to enhance business value delivery with Agile practices.

    • Enable Organization-Wide Collaboration by Scaling Agile – Phase 2: Define Scaled Agile Target State

    3. Create implementation plan

    Roll out scaling Agile initiatives in a gradual, iterative approach and define the right metrics to demonstrate success.

    • Enable Organization-Wide Collaboration by Scaling Agile – Phase 3: Create Implementation Plan
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Enable Organization-Wide Collaboration by Scaling Agile

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Gauge Your Readiness to Scale Up Agile

    The Purpose

    Identify the business objectives and functional group drivers for adopting Agile practices to gauge the fit of scaling Agile.

    Select the pilot project to demonstrate the value of scaling Agile.

    Review and evaluate your current Agile development process and functional group structure.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Understanding of the notable business and functional group gaps that can derail the scaling of Agile.

    Selection of a pilot program that will be used to gather metrics to continuously improve implementation and obtain buy-in for wider rollout.

    Realization of the root causes behind functional group and process issues in the current Agile implementation.

    Activities

    1.1 Assess your pilot functional group

    Outputs

    Fit assessment of functional group to pilot Agile scaling

    Selection of pilot program

    List of critical success factors

    2 Define Your Scaled Agile Target State

    The Purpose

    Think of solutions to address the root causes of current communication and process issues that can derail scaling initiatives.

    Brainstorm opportunities to enhance the delivery of business value to customers.

    Generate a target state for your scaled Agile implementation.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Defined Agile capabilities and services of your functional group.

    Optimized functional group team structure, development process, and program framework to support scaled Agile in your context.

    Identification and accommodation of the risks associated with implementing and executing Agile capabilities.

    Activities

    2.1 Define Agile capabilities at scale

    2.2 Build your scaled Agile target state

    Outputs

    Solutions to scaling issues and opportunities to deliver more business value

    Agile capability map

    Functional group team structure, Agile development process and program framework optimized to support scaled Agile

    Risk assessment of scaling Agile initiatives

    3 Create Your Implementation Plan

    The Purpose

    List metrics to gauge the success of your scaling Agile implementation.

    Define the initiatives to scale Agile in your organization and to prepare for a wider rollout.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Strategic selection of the right metrics to demonstrate the value of scaling Agile initiatives.

    Scaling Agile implementation roadmap based on current resource capacities, task complexities, and business priorities.

    Activities

    3.1 Create your implementation plan

    Outputs

    List of metrics to gauge scaling Agile success

    Scaling Agile implementation roadmap

    Monitor IT Employee Experience

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}543|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 10.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $29,096 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 19 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Engage
    • Parent Category Link: /engage
    • In IT, high turnover and sub-optimized productivity can have huge impacts on IT’s ability to execute SLAs, complete projects on time, and maintain operations effectively.
    • With record low unemployment rates in IT, retaining top employees and keeping them motivated in their jobs has never been more critical.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • One bad experience can cost you your top employee. Engagement is the sum total of the day-to-day experiences your employees have with your company.
    • Engagement, not pay, drives results. Engagement is key to your team's productivity and ability to retain top talent. Approach it systematically to learn what really drives your team.
    • It’s time for leadership to step up. As the CIO, it’s up to you to take ownership of your team’s engagement.

    Impact and Result

    • Info-Tech tools and guidance will help you initiate an effective conversation with your team around engagement, and avoid common pitfalls in implementing engagement initiatives.
    • Monitoring employee experience continuously using the Employee Experience Monitor enables you to take a data-driven approach to evaluating the success of your engagement initiatives.

    Monitor IT Employee Experience Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should focus on employee experience to improve engagement in IT, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand how our tools will help you construct an effective employee engagement program.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Start monitoring employee experience

    Plan out your employee engagement program and launch the Employee Experience Monitor survey for your team.

    • Drive IT Performance by Monitoring Employee Experience – Phase 1: Start Monitoring Employee Experience
    • None
    • None
    • EXM Setup Guide
    • EXM Training Guide for Managers
    • None
    • EXM Communication Template

    2. Analyze results and ideate solutions

    Interpret your Employee Experience Monitor results, understand what they mean in the context of your team, and involve your staff in brainstorming engagement initiatives.

    • Drive IT Performance by Monitoring Employee Experience – Phase 2: Analyze Results and Ideate Solutions
    • EXM Focus Group Facilitation Guide
    • Focus Group Facilitation Guide Driver Definitions

    3. Select and implement engagement initiatives

    Select engagement initiatives for maximal impact, create an action plan, and establish open and ongoing communication about engagement with your team.

    • Drive IT Performance by Monitoring Employee Experience – Phase 3: Measure and Communicate Results
    • Engagement Progress One-Pager
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Monitor IT Employee Experience

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Launch the EXM

    The Purpose

    Set up the EXM and collect a few months of data to build on during the workshop.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Arm yourself with an index of employee experience and candid feedback from your team to use as a starting point for your engagement program.

    Activities

    1.1 Identify EXM use case.

    1.2 Identify engagement program goals and obstacles.

    1.3 Launch EXM.

    Outputs

    Defined engagement goals.

    EXM online dashboard with three months of results.

    2 Explore Engagement

    The Purpose

    To understand the current state of engagement and prepare to discuss the drivers behind it with your staff.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Empower your leadership team to take charge of their own team's engagement.

    Activities

    2.1 Review EXM results to understand employee experience.

    2.2 Finalize focus group agendas.

    2.3 Train managers.

    Outputs

    Customized focus group agendas.

    3 Hold Employee Focus Groups

    The Purpose

    Establish an open dialogue with your staff to understand what drives their engagement.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Understand where in your team’s experience you can make the most impact as an IT leader.

    Activities

    3.1 Identify priority drivers.

    3.2 Identify engagement KPIs.

    3.3 Brainstorm engagement initiatives.

    3.4 Vote on initiatives within teams.

    Outputs

    Summary of focus groups results

    Identified engagement initiatives.

    4 Select and Plan Initiatives

    The Purpose

    Learn the characteristics of successful engagement initiatives and build execution plans for each.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Choose initiatives with the greatest impact on your team’s engagement, and ensure you have the necessary resources for success.

    Activities

    4.1 Select engagement initiatives with IT leadership.

    4.2 Discuss and decide on the top five engagement initiatives.

    4.3 Create initiative project plans.

    4.4 Build detailed project plans.

    4.5 Present project plans.

    Outputs

    Engagement project plans.

    Get Started With Customer Advocacy

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}565|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Marketing Solutions
    • Parent Category Link: /marketing-solutions

    Getting started with customer advocacy (CA) is no easy task. Many customer success professionals carry out ad hoc customer advocacy activities to address immediate needs but lack a more strategic approach.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Customer success leaders must reposition their CA program around growth; the recognition that customer advocacy is a strategic growth initiative is necessary to succeed in today’s competitive market.
    • Get key stakeholders on board early – especially Sales!
    • Always link your CA efforts back to retention and growth.
    • Make building genuine relationships with your advocates the cornerstone of your CA program.

    Impact and Result

    • Enable the organization to identify and develop meaningful relationships with top customers and advocates.
    • Understand the concepts and benefits of CA and how CA can be used to improve marketing and sales and fuel growth and competitiveness.
    • Follow SoftwareReviews’ methodology to identify where to start to apply CA within the organization.
    • Develop a customer advocacy proof of concept/pilot program to gain stakeholder approval and funding to get started with or expand efforts around customer advocacy.

    Get Started With Customer Advocacy Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Get Started With Customer Advocacy Executive Brief – An overview of why customer advocacy is critical to your organization and the recommended approach for getting started with a pilot program.

    Understand the strategic benefits and process for building a formal customer advocacy program. To be successful, you must reposition CA as a strategic growth initiative and continually link any CA efforts back to growth.

    • Get Started With Customer Advocacy Storyboard

    2. Define Your Advocacy Requirements – Assess your current customer advocacy efforts, identify gaps, and define your program requirements.

    With the assessment tool and steps outlined in the storyboard, you will be able to understand the gaps and pain points, where and how to improve your efforts, and how to establish program requirements.

    • Customer Advocacy Maturity Assessment Tool

    3. Win Executive Approval and Launch Pilot – Develop goals, success metrics, and timelines, and gain approval for your customer advocacy pilot.

    Align on pilot goals, key milestones, and program elements using the template and storyboard to effectively communicate with stakeholders and gain executive buy-in for your customer advocacy pilot.

    • Get Started With Customer Advocacy Executive Presentation Template

    Infographic

    Further reading

    Get Started With Customer Advocacy

    Develop a customer advocacy program to transform customer satisfaction into revenue growth.

    EXECUTIVE BRIEF

    Analyst perspective

    Customer advocacy is critical to driving revenue growth

    The image contains a picture of Emily Wright.

    Customer advocacy puts the customer at the center of everything your organization does. By cultivating a deep understanding of customer needs and how they define value and by delivering positive experiences throughout the customer journey, organizations inspire and empower customers to become evangelists for their brands or products. Both the client and solution provider enjoy satisfying and ongoing business outcomes as a result.

    Focusing on customer advocacy is critical for software solutions providers. Business-to-business (B2B) buyers are increasingly looking to their peers and third-party resources to arm themselves with information on solutions they feel they can trust before they choose to engage with solution providers. Your satisfied customers are now your most trusted and powerful resource.

    Customer advocacy helps build strong relationships with your customers, nurtures brand advocacy, gives your marketing messaging credibility, and differentiates your company from the competition; it’s critical to driving revenue growth. Companies that develop mature advocacy programs can increase Customer Lifetime Value (CLV) by 16% (Wharton Business School, 2009), increase customer retention by 35% (Deloitte, 2011), and give themselves a strong competitive advantage in an increasingly competitive marketplace.

    Emily Wright
    Senior Research Analyst, Advisory
    SoftwareReviews

    Executive summary

    Your Challenge

    Ad hoc customer advocacy (CA) efforts and reference programs, while still useful, are not enough to drive growth. Providers increase their chance for success by assessing if they face the following challenges:

    • Lack of referenceable customers that can turn into passionate advocates, or a limited pool that is at risk of burnout.
    • Lack of references for all key customer types, verticals, etc., especially in new growth segments or those that are hard to recruit.
    • Lack of a consistent program for gathering customer feedback and input to make improvements and increase customer satisfaction.
    • Lack of executive and stakeholder (e.g. Sales, Customer Success, channel partners, etc.) buy-in for the importance and value of customer advocacy.

    Building a strong customer advocacy program must be a high priority for customer service/success leaders in today’s highly competitive software markets.

    Common Obstacles

    Getting started with customer advocacy is no easy task. Many customer success professionals carry out ad hoc customer advocacy activities to address immediate needs but lack a more strategic approach. What separates them from success are several nagging obstacles:

    • Efforts lack funding and buy-in from stakeholders.
    • Senior management doesn’t fully understand the business value of a customer advocacy program.
    • Duplicate efforts are taking place between Sales, Marketing, product teams, etc., because ownership, roles, and responsibilities have not been determined.
    • Relationships are guarded/hoarded by those who feel they own the relationship (e.g. Sales, Customer Success, channel partners, etc.).
    • Customer-facing staff often lack the necessary skills to foster customer advocacy.

    SoftwareReviews’ Approach

    This blueprint will help leaders of customer advocacy programs get started with developing a formalized pilot program that will demonstrate the value of customer advocacy and lay a strong foundation to justify rollout. Through SoftwareReviews’ approach, customer advocacy leaders will:

    • Enable the organization to identify and develop meaningful relationships with top customers and advocates.
    • Understand the concepts and benefits of CA and how CA can be used to improve marketing and sales and fuel growth and competitiveness.
    • Follow SoftwareReviews’ methodology to identify where to start to apply CA within the organization.
    • Develop a customer advocacy proof of concept/pilot program to gain stakeholder approval and funding to get started with or expand efforts around customer advocacy.

    What is customer advocacy?

    “Customer advocacy is the act of putting customer needs first and working to deliver solution-based assistance through your products and services." – Testimonial Hero, 2021

    Customer advocacy is designed to keep customers loyal through customer engagement and advocacy marketing campaigns. Successful customer advocacy leaders experience decreased churn while increasing return on investment (ROI) through retention, acquisition, and cost savings.

    Businesses that implement customer advocacy throughout their organizations find new ways of supporting customers, provide additional customer value, and ensure their brands stand unique among the competition.

    Customer Advocacy Is…

    • An integral part of any marketing and/or business strategy.
    • Essential to improving and maintaining high levels of customer satisfaction.
    • Focused on delivering value to customers.
    • Not only a set of actions, but a mindset that should be fostered and reinforced through a customer-centric culture.
    • Mutually beneficial relationships for both company and customer.

    Customer Advocacy Is Not…

    • Only referrals and testimonials.
    • Solely about what you can get from your advocates.
    • Brand advocacy. Brand advocacy is the desired outcome of customer advocacy.
    • Transactional. Brand advocates must be engaged.
    • A nice-to-have.
    • Solved entirely by software. Think about what you want to achieve and how a software solution can you help you reach those goals.

    SoftwareReviews Insight

    Customer advocacy has evolved into being a valued company asset versus a simple referral program – success requires an organization-wide customer-first mindset and the recognition that customer advocacy is a strategic growth initiative necessary to succeed in today’s competitive market.

    Customer advocacy: Essential to high retention

    When customers advocate for your company and products, they are eager to retain the value they receive

    • Customer acts of advocacy correlate to high retention.
    • Acts of advocacy won’t happen unless customers feel their interests are placed ahead of your company’s, thereby increasing satisfaction and customer success. That’s the definition of a customer-centric culture.
    • And yet your company does receive significant benefits from customer advocacy:
      • When customers advocate and renew, your costs go down and margins rise because it costs less to keep a happy customer than it does to bring a new customer onboard.
      • When renewal rates are high, customer lifetime value increases, also increasing profitability.

    Acquiring a new customer can cost five times more than retaining an existing customer (Huify, 2018).

    Increasing customer retention by 5% can increase profits by 25% to 95% (Bain & Company, cited in Harvard Business Review, 2014).

    SoftwareReviews Insight

    Don’t overlook the value of customer advocacy to retention! Despite the common knowledge that it’s far easier and cheaper to sell to an existing customer than to sell to a new prospect, most companies fail to leverage their customer advocacy programs and continue to put pressure on Marketing to focus their budgets on customer acquisition.

    Customer advocacy can also be your ultimate growth strategy

    In your marketing and sales messaging, acts of advocacy serve as excellent proof points for value delivered.

    Forty-five percent of businesses rank online reviews as a top source of information for selecting software during this (top of funnel) stage, followed closely by recommendations and referrals at 42%. These sources are topped only by company websites at 54% (Clutch, 2020).

    With referrals coming from customer advocates to prospects via your lead gen engine and through seller talk tracks, customer advocacy is central to sales, marketing, and customer experience success.

    ✓ Advocates can help your new customers learn your solution and ensure higher adoption and satisfaction.
    ✓ Advocates can provide valuable, honest feedback on new updates and features.

    The image contains a picture to demonstrate the cycle of customer advocacy. The image has four circles, with one big circle in the middle and three circles surrounding with arrows pointing in both directions in between them. The middle circle is labelled customer advocacy. The three circles are labelled: sales, customer success, marketing.

    “A customer advocacy program is not just a fancy buzz word or a marketing tool that’s nice to have. It’s a core discipline that every major brand needs to integrate into their overall marketing, sales and customer success strategies if they expect to survive in this trust economy. Customer advocacy arguably is the common asset that runs throughout all marketing, sales and customer success activities regardless of the stage of the buyer’s journey and ties it all together.” – RO Innovation, 2017

    Positive experience drives acts of advocacy

    More than price or product, experience now leads the way in customer advocacy and retention

    Advocacy happens when customers recommend your product. Our research shows that the biggest drivers of likeliness to recommend and acts of customer advocacy are the positive experiences customers have with vendors and their products, not product features or cost savings. Customers want to feel that:

    1. Their productivity and performance is enhanced and the vendor is helping them to innovate and grow as a company.
    2. Their vendor inspires them and helps them to continually improve.
    3. They can rely on the vendor and the product they purchased.
    4. They are respected by the vendor.
    5. They can trust that the vendor will be on their side and save them time.

    The image contains a graph to demonstrate the correlation of likeliness to recommend a satisfaction driver. Where anything above a 0.5 indicates a strong driver of satisfaction.

    Note that anything above 0.5 indicates a strong driver of satisfaction.
    Source: SoftwareReviews buyer reviews (based on 82,560 unique reviews).

    SoftwareReviews Insight

    True customer satisfaction comes from helping customers innovate, enhancing their performance, inspiring them to continually improve, and being reliable, respectful, trustworthy, and conscious of their time. These true drivers of satisfaction should be considered in your customer advocacy and retention efforts. The experience customers have with your product and brand is what will differentiate your brand from competitors, drive advocacy, and ultimately, power business growth. Talk to a SoftwareReviews advisor to learn how users rate your product on these satisfaction drivers in the SoftwareReviews Emotional Footprint Report.

    Yet challenges exist for customer advocacy program leaders

    Customer success leaders without a strong customer advocacy program feel numerous avoidable pains:

    • Lack of compelling stories and proof points for the sales team, causing long sales cycles.
    • Heavy reliance on a small pool of worn-out references.
    • Lack of references for all needed customer types, verticals, etc.
    • Lack of a reliable customer feedback process for solution improvements.
    • Overspending on acquiring new customers due to a lack of customer proof points.
    • Missed opportunities that could grow the business (customer lifetime value, upsell/cross-sell, etc.).

    Marketing, customer success, and sales teams experiencing any one of the above challenges must consider getting started with a more formalized customer advocacy program.

    Obstacles to customer advocacy programs

    Leaders must overcome several barriers in developing a customer advocacy program:

    • Stakeholders are often unclear on the value customer advocacy programs can bring and require proof of benefits to invest.
    • Efforts are duplicated among sales, marketing, product, and customer success teams, given ownership and collaboration practices are ill-defined or nonexistent.
    • There is a culture of guarding or hoarding customer relationships by those who feel they own the relationship, or there’s high turnover among employees who own the customer relationships.
    • The governance, technology, people, skills, and/or processes to take customer advocacy to the next level are lacking.
    • Leaders don’t know where to start with customer advocacy, what needs to be improved, or what to focus on first.

    A lack of customer centricity hurts organizations

    12% of people believe when a company says they put customers first. (Source: HubSpot, 2019)

    Brands struggle to follow through on brand promises, and a mismatch between expectations and lived experience emerges. Customer advocacy can help close this gap and help companies live up to their customer-first messaging.

    42% of companies don’t conduct any customer surveys or collect feedback. (Source: HubSpot, 2019)

    Too many companies are not truly listening to their customers. Companies that don’t collect feedback aren’t going to know what to change to improve customer satisfaction. Customer advocacy will orient companies around their customer and create a reliable feedback loop that informs product and service enhancements.

    Customer advocacy is no longer a nice-to-have but a necessity for solution providers

    B2B buyers increasingly turn to peers to learn about solutions:

    “84% of B2B decision makers start the buying process with a referral.” (Source: Influitive, Gainsight & Pendo, 2020)

    “46% of B2B buyers rely on customer references for information before purchasing.” (Source: RO Innovation, 2017)

    “91% of B2B purchasers’ buying decisions are influenced by word-of-mouth recommendations.” (Source: ReferralRock, 2022)

    “76% of individuals admit that they’re more likely to trust content shared by ‘normal’ people than content shared by brands.” (Source: TrustPilot, 2020)

    By ignoring the importance of customer advocacy, companies and brands are risking stagnation and missing out on opportunities to gain competitive advantage and achieve growth.

    Getting Started With Customer Advocacy: SoftwareReviews' Approach

    1 BUILD
    Build the business case
    Identify your key stakeholders, steering committee, and working team, understand key customer advocacy principles, and note success barriers and ways to overcome them as your first steps.

    2 DEVELOP
    Develop your advocacy requirements
    Assess your current customer advocacy maturity, identify gaps in your current efforts, and develop your ideal advocate profile.

    3 WIN
    Win executive approval and implement pilot
    Determine goals and success metrics for the pilot, establish a timeline and key project milestones, create advocate communication materials, and finally gain executive buy-in and implement the pilot.

    SoftwareReviews Insight
    Building and implementing a customer advocacy pilot will help lay the foundation for a full program and demonstrate to executives and key stakeholders the impact on revenue, retention, and CLV that can be achieved through coordinated and well-planned customer advocacy efforts.

    Customer advocacy benefits

    Our research benefits customer advocacy program managers by enabling them to:

    • Explain why having a centralized, proactive customer advocacy program is important.
    • Clearly communicate the benefits and business case for having a formalized customer advocacy program.
    • Develop a customer advocacy pilot to provide a proof of concept (POC) and demonstrate the value of customer advocacy.
    • Assess the maturity of your current customer advocacy efforts and identify what to improve and how to improve to grow your customer advocacy function.

    "Advocacy is the currency for business and the fuel for explosive growth. Successful marketing executives who understand this make advocacy programs an essential part of their go-to-market strategy. They also know that advocacy isn't something you simply 'turn on': ... ultimately, it's about making human connections and building relationships that have enduring value for everyone involved."
    - Dan Cote, Influitive, Dec. 2021

    Case Study: Advocate impact on sales at Genesys

    Genesys' Goal

    Provide sales team with compelling customer reviews, quotes, stories, videos, and references.

    Approach to Advocacy

    • Customers were able to share their stories through Genesys' customer hub GCAP as quotes, reviews, etc., and could sign up to host reference forum sessions for prospective customers.
    • Content was developed that demonstrated ROI with using Genesys' solutions, including "top-tier logos, inspiring quotes, and reference forums featuring some of their top advocates" (Influitive, 2021).
    • Leveraged customer advocacy-specific software solution integration with the CRM to easily identify reference recommendations for Sales.

    Advocate Impact on Sales

    According to Influitive (2021), the impacts were:

    • 386% increase in revenue influences from references calls
    • 82% of revenue has been influence by reference calls
    • 78 reference calls resulted in closed-won opportunities
    • 250 customers and prospects attended 7 reference forums
    • 112 reference slides created for sales enablement
    • 100+ quotes were collect and transformed into 78 quote slides

    Who benefits from getting started with customer advocacy?

    This Research Is Designed for:

    • Customer advocacy leaders and marketers who are looking to:
      • Take a more strategic, proactive, and structured approach to customer advocacy.
      • Find a more effective and reliable way to gather customer feedback and input on products and services.
      • Develop and nurture a customer-oriented mindset throughout the organization.
      • Improve marketing credibility both within the company and outside to prospective customers.

    This Research Will Help You:

    • Explain why having a centralized, proactive customer advocacy program is important.
    • Clearly communicate the benefits and business case for having a formalized customer advocacy program.
    • Develop a customer advocacy pilot to provide a proof of concept (POC) and demonstrate the value of customer advocacy.
    • Assess the maturity of your current customer advocacy efforts and identify what to improve and how to improve to grow your customer advocacy function.

    This Research Will Also Assist:

    • Customer success leaders and sales directors who are responsible for:
      • Gathering customer references and testimonials.
      • Referral or voice of the customer (VoC) programs.

    This Research Will Help Them:

    • Align stakeholders on an overall program of identifying ideal advocates.
    • Coordinate customer advocacy efforts and actions.
    • Gather and make use of customer feedback to improve products, solutions, and service provided.
    • Provide an amazing customer experience throughout the entirety of the customer journey.

    SoftwareReviews’ methodology for getting started with customer advocacy

    Phase Steps

    1. Build the business case

    1. Identify your key stakeholders, steering committee, and working team
    2. Understand the concepts and benefits of customer advocacy as they apply to your organization
    3. Outline barriers to success, risks, and risk mitigation tactics

    2. Develop your advocacy requirements

    1. Assess your customer advocacy maturity using the SoftwareReviews CA Maturity Assessment Tool
    2. Identify gaps/pains in current CA efforts and add tasks to your action plan
    3. Develop ideal advocate profile/identify target advocate segment(s)

    3. Create implementation plan and pitch CA pilot

    1. Determine pilot goals and success metrics
    2. Establish timeline and create advocate communication materials
    3. Gain executive buy-in and implement pilot

    Phase Outcomes

    1. Common understanding of CA concepts and benefits
    2. Buy-in from CEO and head of Sales
    3. List of opportunities, risks, and risk mitigation tactics
    1. Identification of gaps in current customer advocacy efforts and/or activities
    2. Understanding customer advocacy readiness
    3. Identification of ideal advocate profile/target segment
    4. Basic actions to bridge gaps in CA efforts
    1. Clear objective for CA pilot
    2. Key metrics for program success
    3. Pilot timelines and milestones
    4. Executive presentation with business case for CA

    Insight summary

    Customer advocacy is a critical strategic growth initiative
    Customer advocacy (CA) has evolved into being a highly valued company asset as opposed to a simple referral program, but not everyone in the organization sees it that way. Customer success leaders must reposition their CA program around growth instead of focusing solely on retention and communicate this to key stakeholders. The recognition that customer advocacy is a strategic growth initiative is necessary to succeed in today’s competitive market.

    Get key stakeholders on board early – especially Sales!
    Work to bring the CEO and the head of Sales on your side early. Sales is the gatekeeper – they need to open the door to customers to turn them into advocates. Clearly reposition CA for growth and communicate that to the CEO and head of Sales; wider buy-in will follow.

    Identify the highest priority segment for generating acts of advocacy
    By focusing on the highest priority segment, you accomplish a number of things: generating growth in a critical customer segment, proving the value of customer advocacy to key stakeholders (especially Sales), and setting a strong foundation for customer advocacy to build upon and expand the program out to other segments.

    Always link your CA efforts back to retention and growth
    By clearly demonstrating the impact that customer advocacy has on not only retention but also overall growth, marketers will gain buy-in from key stakeholders, secure funding for a full CA program, and gain the resources needed to expand customer advocacy efforts.

    Focus on providing value to advocates
    Many organizations take a transactional approach to customer advocacy, focusing on what their advocates can do for them. To truly succeed with CA, focus on providing your advocates with value first and put them in the spotlight.

    Make building genuine relationships with your advocates the cornerstone of your CA program
    "57% of small businesses say that having a relationship with their consumers is the primary driver of repeat business" (Factory360).

    Guided Implementation

    What does our GI on getting started with building customer advocacy look like?

    Build the Business Case

    Call #1: Identify key stakeholders. Map out motivations and anticipate any concerns or objections. Determine steering committee and working team. Plan next call – 1 week.

    Call #2: Discuss concepts and benefits of customer advocacy as they apply to organizational goals. Plan next call – 1 week.

    Call #3: Discuss barriers to success, risks, and risk mitigation tactics. Plan next call – 1 week.

    Call #4: Finalize CA goals, opportunities, and risks and develop business case. Plan next call – 2 weeks.

    Develop Your Advocacy Requirements

    Call #5: Review the SoftwareReviews CA Maturity Assessment Tool. Assess your current level of customer advocacy maturity. Plan next call – 1 week.

    Call #6: Review gaps and pains in current CA efforts. Discuss tactics and possible CA pilot program goals. Begin adding tasks to action plan. Plan next call – 2 weeks.

    Call #7: Discuss ideal advocate profile and target segments. Plan next call – 2 weeks.

    Call #8: Validate and finalize ideal advocate profile. Plan next call – 1 week.

    Win Executive Approval and Implement Pilot

    Call #9: Discuss CA pilot scope. Discuss performance metrics and KPIs. Plan next call – 3 days.

    Call #10: Determine timeline and key milestones. Plan next call –2 weeks.

    Call #11: Develop advocate communication materials. Plan next call – 3 days.

    Call #12: Review final business case and coach on executive presentation. Plan next call – 1 week.

    A Guided Implementation (GI) is series of calls with a SoftwareReviews Advisory analyst to help implement our best practices in your organization. For guidance on marketing applications, we can arrange a discussion with an Info-Tech analyst. Your engagement managers will work with you to schedule analyst calls.


    Customer Advocacy Workshop

    Pre-Workshop Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 Post-Workshop
    Activities Identify Stakeholders & CA Pilot Team Build the Business Case Assess Current CA Efforts Develop Advocacy Goals & Ideal Advocate Profile Develop Project Timelines, Materials, and Exec Presentation Next Steps and Wrap-Up (offsite) Pitch CA Pilot
    0.1 Identify key stakeholders to involve in customer advocacy pilot and workshop; understand their motivations and anticipate possible concerns. 1.1 Review key CA concepts and identify benefits of CA for the organization.
    1.2 Outline barriers to success, risks, and risk mitigation tactics.
    2.1 Assess your customer advocacy maturity using the SoftwareReviews CA Maturity Assessment Tool.
    2.2 Identify gaps/pains in current CA efforts.
    2.3 Prioritize gaps from diagnostic and any other critical pain points.
    3.1 Identify and document the ideal advocate profile and target customer segment for pilot.
    3.2 Determine goal(s) and success metrics for program pilot.
    4.1 Develop pilot timelines and key milestones.
    4.2 Outline materials needed and possible messaging.
    4.3 Build the executive buy-in presentation.
    5.1 Complete in-progress deliverables from the previous four days. 6.1 Present to executive team and stakeholders.
    6.2 Gain executive buy-in and key stakeholder approval.
    6.3 Execute CA pilot.
    Deliverables
    1. Rationale for CA pilot; clear benefits, and how they apply to the organization.
    2. Documented barriers to success, risks, and risk mitigation tactics.
    1. CA Maturity Assessment results.
    2. Identification of gaps in current customer advocacy efforts and/or activities.
    1. Documented ideal advocate profile/target customer segment.
    2. Clear goal(s) and success metrics for CA pilot.
    1. Documented pilot timelines and key milestones.
    2. Draft/outlines of advocate materials.
    3. Draft executive presentation with business case for CA.
    1. Finalized implementation plan for CA pilot.
    2. Finalized executive presentation with business case for CA.
    1. Buy-in from decision makers and key stakeholders.

    Contact your account representative for more information.
    workshops@infotech.com
    1-888-670-8889

    Get started!

    Know your target market and audience, deploy well-designed strategies based on shared values, and make meaningful connections with people.

    Phase 1
    Build the Business Case

    Phase 2
    Develop Your Advocacy Requirements

    Phase 3
    Win Executive Approval and Implement Pilot

    Phase 1: Build the Business Case

    Steps
    1.1 Identify your key stakeholders, steering committee, and working team
    1.2 Understand the concepts and benefits of customer advocacy as they apply to your organization
    1.3 Outline barriers to success, risks, and risk mitigation tactics

    Phase Outcome

    • Common understanding of CA concepts and benefits
    • Buy-in from CEO and head of Sales
    • List of barriers to success, risks, and risk mitigation tactics

    Build the business case

    Step 1.1 Identify your key stakeholders, steering committee, and working team

    Total duration: 2.5-8.0 hours

    Objective
    Identify, document, and finalize your key stakeholders to know who to involve and how to get them onboard by truly understanding the forces of influence.

    Output

    • Robust stakeholder list with key stakeholders identified.
    • Steering committee and working team decided.

    Participants

    • Customer advocacy lead
    • Identified stakeholders
    • Workstream leads

    MarTech
    None

    Tools

    1.1.1 Identify Stakeholders
    (60-120 min.)

    Identify
    Using the guidance on slide 28, identify all stakeholders who would be involved or impacted by your customer advocacy pilot by entering names and titles into columns A and B on slide 27 "Stakeholder List Worksheet."

    Document
    Document as much information about each stakeholder as possible in columns C, D, E, and F into the table on slide 27.

    1.1.2 Select Steering Committee & Working Team
    (60-90 min.)

    Select
    Using the guidance on slides 28 and 29 and the information collected in the table on slide 27, identify the stakeholders that are steering committee members, functional workstream leads, or operations; document in column G on slide 27.

    Document
    Open the Executive Presentation Template to slides 5 and 6 and document your final steering committee and working team selections. Be sure to note the Executive Sponsor and Program Manager on slide 5.

    Tips & Reminders

    1. It is critical to identify "key stakeholders"; a single missed key stakeholder can disrupt an initiative. A good way to ensure that nobody is missed is to first uncover as many stakeholders as possible and later decide how important they are.
    2. Ensure steering committee representation from each department this initiative would impact or that may need to be involved in decision-making or problem-solving endeavors.

    Consult Info-Tech's Manage Stakeholder Relations blueprint for additional guidance on identifying and managing stakeholders, or contact one of our analysts for more personalized assistance and guidance.

    Stakeholder List Worksheet

    *Possible Roles
    Executive Sponsor
    Program Manager
    Workstream Lead
    Functional Lead
    Steering Committee
    Operations
    A B C D E F G
    Name Position Decision Involvement
    (Driver / Approver / Contributor / Informe
    Direct Benefit?
    (Yes / No)
    Motivation Concerns *Role in Customer Advocacy Pilot
    E.g. Jane Doe VP, Customer Success A N
    • Increase customer retention
    • Customer advocate burnout
    Workstream Lead

    Customer advocacy stakeholders

    What to consider when identifying stakeholders required for CA:
    Customer advocacy should be done as a part of a cross-functional company initiative. When identifying stakeholders, consider:

    • Who can make the ultimate decision on approving the CA program?
    • Who are the senior leadership members you need buy-in from?
    • Who do you need to support the CA program?
    • Who is affected by the CA program?
    • Who will help you build the CA program?
    • Where and among who is there enthusiasm for customer advocacy?
    • Consider stakeholders from Customer Success, Marketing, Sales, Product, PR & Social, etc.
    Key Roles Supporting an Effective Customer Advocacy Pilot
    Executive Sponsor
    • Owns the function at the management/C-suite level
    • Responsible for breaking down barriers and ensuring alignment with organizational strategy
    • CMO, VP of Marketing, and in SMB providers, the CEO
    Program Manager
    • Typically, a senior member of the marketing team
    • Responsible for organizing the customer advocacy pilot, preparing summary executive-level communications, and approval requests
    • Program manages the customer advocacy pilot, and in many cases, the continued formal program
    • Product Marketing Director, or other Marketing Director, who has strong program management skills, has run large-scale marketing or product programs, and is familiar with the stakeholder roles and enabling technologies
    Functional / Workstream Leads
    • Works alongside the Program Manager on planning and implementing the customer advocacy pilot and ensures functional workstreams are aligned with pilot objectives
    • Typical customer advocacy pilots will have a team comprised of representatives from Marketing, Sales, and Customer Success
    Steering Committee
    • Comprised of C-suite/management-level individuals that guide key decisions, approve requests, and mitigate any functional conflicts
    • Responsible for validating goals and priorities, enabling adequate resourcing, and critical decision making
    • CMO, CRO/Head of Sales, Head of Customer Success
    Operations
    • Comprised of individuals whose application and tech tools knowledge and skills support integration of customer advocacy functions into existing tech stack/CRM (e.g. adding custom fields into CRM)
    • Responsible for helping select technology that enables customer advocacy program activities
    • CRM, Marketing Applications, and Analytics Managers, IT Managers

    Customer advocacy working team

    Consider the skills and knowledge required for planning and executing a customer advocacy pilot.

    Workstream leads should have strong project management and collaboration skills and deep understanding of both product and customers (persona, journeys, satisfaction, etc.).

    Required Skills Suggested Functions
    • Project management
    • CRM knowledge
    • Marketing automation experience
    • MarTech knowledge
    • Understanding of buyer persona and journey
    • Product knowledge
    • Understanding of executive-level goals for the pilot
    • Content creation
    • Customer advocacy experience, if possible
    • Customer satisfaction
    • Email and event marketing experience
    • Customer Success
    • Marketing
    • Sales
    • Product
    • PR/Corporate Comms.

    Build the business case

    Step 1.2 Understand key concepts and benefits of customer advocacy

    Total duration: 2.0-4.0 hours

    Objective
    Understand customer advocacy and what benefits you seek from your customer advocacy program, and get set up to best communicate them to executives and decision makers.

    Output

    • Documented customer advocacy benefits

    Participants

    • Customer advocacy lead

    MarTech
    None

    Tools

    1.2.1 Discuss Key Concepts
    (60-120 min.)

    Envision
    Schedule a visioning session with key stakeholders and share the Get Started With Customer Advocacy Executive Brief (slides 3-23 in this deck).

    Discuss how key customer advocacy concepts can apply to your organization and how CA can contribute to organizational growth.

    Document
    Determine the top benefits sought from the customer advocacy program pilot and record them on slides 4 and 12 in the Executive Presentation Template.

    Finalize
    Work with the Executive Sponsor to finalize the "Message from the CMO" on slide 4 in the Executive Presentation Template.

    Tips & Reminders

    Keep in mind that while we're starting off broadly, the pilot for your customer advocacy program should be narrow and focused in scope.

    Build the business case

    Step 1.3 Understand barriers to success, risks, and risk mitigation tactics

    Total duration: 2.0-8.0 hours

    Objective
    Anticipate threats to pilot success; identify barriers to success, any possible risks, and what can be done to reduce the chances of a negative pilot outcome.

    Output

    • Awareness of barriers
    • Tactics to mitigate risk

    Participants

    • Customer advocacy lead
    • Key stakeholders

    MarTech
    None

    Tools

    1.3.1 Brainstorm Barriers to Success & Possible Risks
    (60-120 min.)

    Identify
    Using slide 7 of the Executive Presentation Template, brainstorm any barriers to success that may exist and risks to the customer advocacy program pilot success. Consider the people, processes, and technology that may be required.

    Document
    Document all information on slide 7 of the Executive Presentation Template.

    1.3.2 Develop Risk Mitigation Tactics
    (60-300 min.)

    Develop
    Brainstorm different ways to address any of the identified barriers to success and reduce any risks. Consider the people, processes, and technology that may be required.

    Document
    Document all risk mitigation tactics on slide 7 of the Executive Presentation Template.

    Tips & Reminders
    There are several types of risk to explore. Consider the following when brainstorming possible risks:

    • Damage to brand (if advocate guidance not provided)
    • Legal (compliance with regulations and laws around contact, incentives, etc.)
    • Advocate burnout
    • Negative advocate feedback

    Phase 2: Develop Your Advocacy Requirements

    Steps
    2.1 Assess your customer advocacy maturity
    2.2 Identify and document gaps and pain points
    2.3 Develop your ideal advocate profile

    Phase Outcome

    • Identification of gaps in current customer advocacy efforts or activities
    • Understanding of customer advocacy readiness and maturity
    • Identification of ideal advocate profile/target segment
    • Basic actions to bridge gaps in CA efforts

    Develop your advocacy requirements

    Step 2.1 Assess your customer advocacy maturity

    Total duration: 2.0-8.0 hours

    Objective
    Use the Customer Advocacy Maturity Assessment Tool to understand your organization's current level of customer advocacy maturity and what to prioritize in the program pilot.

    Output

    • Current level of customer advocacy maturity
    • Know areas to focus on in program pilot

    Participants

    • Customer advocacy lead
    • Key stakeholders

    MarTech
    None

    Tools

    2.1.1 Diagnose Current Customer Advocacy Maturity
    (60-120 min.)

    Diagnose
    Begin on tab 1 of the Customer Advocacy Maturity Assessment Tool and read all instructions.

    Navigate to tab 2. Considering the current state of customer advocacy efforts, answer the diagnostic questions in the Diagnostic tab of the Customer Advocacy Maturity Assessment Tool.

    After completing the questions, you will receive a diagnostic result on tab 3 that will identify areas of strength and weakness and make high-level recommendations for your customer advocacy program pilot.

    2.1.2 Discuss Results
    (60-300 min.)

    Discuss
    Schedule a call to discuss your customer advocacy maturity diagnostic results with a SoftwareReviews Advisor.

    Prioritize the recommendations from the diagnostic, noting which will be included in the program pilot and which require funding and resources to advance.

    Transfer
    Transfer results into slides 8 and 11 of the Executive Presentation Template.

    Tips & Reminders
    Complete the diagnostic with a handful of key stakeholders identified in the previous phase. This will help provide a more balanced and accurate assessment of your organization’s current level of customer advocacy maturity.

    Develop your advocacy requirements

    Step 2.2 Identify and document gaps and pain points

    Total duration: 2.5-8.0 hours

    Objective
    Understand the current pain points within key customer-related processes and within any current customer advocacy efforts taking place.

    Output

    • Prioritized list of pain points that could be addressed by a customer advocacy program.

    Participants

    • Customer advocacy lead
    • Key stakeholders

    MarTech
    None

    Tools

    2.2.1 Identify Pain Points
    (60-120 min.)

    Identify
    Identify and list current pain points being experienced around customer advocacy efforts and processes around sales, marketing, customer success, and product feedback.

    Add any gaps identified in the diagnostic to the list.

    Transfer
    Transfer key information into slide 9 of Executive Presentation Template.

    2.2.2 Prioritize Pain Points
    (60-300 min.)

    Prioritize
    Indicate which pains are the most important and that a customer advocacy program could help improve.

    Schedule a call to discuss the outputs of this step with a SoftwareReviews Advisor.

    Document
    Document priorities on slide 9 of Executive Presentation Template.

    Tips & Reminders

    Customer advocacy won't solve for everything; it's important to be clear about what pain points can and can't be addressed through a customer advocacy program.

    Develop your advocacy requirements

    Step 2.3 Develop your ideal advocate profile

    Total duration: 3.0-9.0 hours

    Objective
    Develop an ideal advocate persona profile that can be used to identify potential advocates, guide campaign messaging, and facilitate advocate engagement.

    Output

    • Ideal advocate persona profile

    Participants

    • Customer advocacy lead
    • Key stakeholders
    • Sales lead
    • Marketing lead
    • Customer Success lead
    • Product lead

    MarTech
    May require the use of:

    • CRM or marketing automation platform
    • Available and up-to-date customer database

    Tools

    2.3.1 Brainstorm Session Around Ideal Advocate Persona
    (60-150 min.)

    Brainstorm
    Lead the team to prioritize an initial, single, most important persona and to collaborate to complete the template.

    Choose your ideal advocate for the pilot based on your most important audience. Start with firmographics like company size, industry, and geography.

    Next, consider satisfaction levels and behavioral attributes, such as renewals, engagement, usage, and satisfaction scores.

    Identify motivations and possible incentives for advocate activities.

    Document
    Use slide 10 of the Executive Presentation Template to complete this exercise.

    2.3.2 Review and Refine Advocate Persona
    (60-300 min.)

    Review & Refine
    Place the Executive Presentation Template in a shared drive for team collaboration. Encourage the team to share persona knowledge within the shared drive version.

    Hold any necessary follow-up sessions to further refine persona.

    Validate
    Interview advocates that best represent your ideal advocate profile on their type of preferred involvement with your company, their role and needs when it comes to your solution, ways they'd be willing to advocate, and rewards sought.

    Confirm
    Incorporate feedback and inputs into slide 10 of the Executive Presentation Template. Ensure everyone agrees on persona developed.

    Tips & Reminders

    1. When identifying potential advocates, choose based on your most important audience.
    2. Ensure you're selecting those with the highest satisfaction scores.
    3. Ideally, select candidates that have, on their own, advocated previously such as in social posts, who may have acted as a reference, or who have been highly visible as a positive influence at customer events.
    4. Knowing motivations will determine the type of acts of advocacy they would be most willing to perform and the incentives for participating in the program.

    Consider the following criteria when identifying advocates and developing your ideal advocate persona:

    Demographics Firmographics Satisfaction & Needs/Value Sought Behavior Motivation
    Role - user, decision-maker, etc. Company size: # of employees Satisfaction score Purchase frequency & repeat purchases (renewals), upgrades Career building/promotion
    Department Company size: revenue NPS score Usage Collaboration with peers
    Geography CLV score Engagement (e.g. email opens, response, meetings) Educate others
    Industry Value delivered (outcomes, occasions used, etc.) Social media interaction, posts Influence (on product, service)
    Tenure as client Benefits sought
    Account size ($) Minimal and resolved service tickets, escalations
    1. When identifying potential advocates, choose based on your most important audience/segments. 2. Ensure you're selecting those with the highest satisfaction, NPS, and CLV scores. 3. When identifying potential advocates, choose based on high engagement and interaction, regular renewals, and high usage. 4. Knowing motivations will determine the type of acts of advocacy they would be most willing to perform and incentives for participating in the program.

    Phase 3: Win Executive Approval and Implement Pilot

    Steps
    3.1 Determine pilot goals and success metrics
    3.2 Establish timeline and create advocate communication materials
    3.3 Gain executive buy-in and implement pilot

    Phase Outcome

    • Clear objective for CA pilot
    • Key metrics for program success
    • Pilot timelines and milestones
    • Executive presentation with business case for CA

    Win executive approval and implement pilot

    Step 3.1 Determine pilot goals and success metrics

    Total duration: 2.0-4.0 hours

    Objective
    Set goals and determine the scope for the customer advocacy program pilot.

    Output

    • Documented business objectives for the pilot
    • Documented success metrics

    Participants

    • Customer advocacy lead
    • Key stakeholders
    • Sales lead
    • Marketing lead
    • Customer Success lead
    • Product lead

    MarTech
    May require to use, set up, or install platforms like:

    • Register to a survey platform
    • CRM or marketing automation platform

    Tools

    3.1.1 Establish Pilot Goals
    (60-120 min.)

    Set
    Organize a meeting with department heads and review organizational and individual department goals.

    Using the Venn diagram on slide 39 in this deck, identify customer advocacy goals that align with business goals. Select the highest priority goal for the pilot.

    Check that the goal aligns with benefits sought or addresses pain points identified in the previous phase.

    Document
    Document the goals on slides 9 and 16 of the Executive Presentation Template.

    3.1.2 Establish Pilot Success Metrics
    (60-120 min.)

    Decide
    Decide how you will measure the success of your program pilot using slide 40 in this document.

    Document
    Document metrics on slide 16 of the Executive Presentation Template.

    Tips & Reminders

    1. Don't boil the ocean. Pick the most important goal that can be achieved through the customer advocacy pilot to gain executive buy-in and support or resources for a formal customer advocacy program. Once successfully completed, you'll be able to tackle new goals and expand the program.
    2. Keep your metrics simple, few in number, and relatively easy to track

    Connect customer advocacy goals with organizational goals

    List possible customer advocacy goals, identifying areas of overlap with organizational goals by taking the following steps:

    1. List organizational/departmental goals in the green oval.
    2. List possible customer advocacy program goals in the purple oval.
    3. Enter goals that are covered in both the Organizational Goals and Customer Advocacy Goals sections into the Shared Goals section in the center.
    4. Highlight the highest priority goal for the customer advocacy program pilot to tackle.
    Organizational Goals Shared Goals Customer Advocacy Goals
    Example Example: Gain customer references to help advance sales and improve win rates Example: Develop pool of customer references
    [insert goal] [insert goal] Example: Gather customer feedback
    [insert goal] [insert goal] [insert goal]
    [insert goal] [insert goal] [insert goal]

    Customer advocacy success metrics for consideration

    This table provides a starting point for measuring the success of your customer advocacy pilot depending on the goals you've set.

    This list is by no means exhaustive; the metrics here can be used, or new metrics that would better capture success measurement can be created and tracked.

    Metric
    Revenue influenced by reference calls ($ / % increase)
    # of reference calls resulting in closed-won opportunities
    # of quotes collected
    % of community growth YoY
    # of pieces of product feedback collected
    # of acts of advocacy
    % membership growth
    % product usage amongst community members
    # of social shares, clicks
    CSAT score for community members
    % of registered qualified leads
    # of leads registered
    # of member sign-ups
    # of net-new referenceable customers
    % growth rate of products used by members
    % engagement rate
    # of published third-party reviews
    % increase in fulfilled RFPs

    When selecting metrics, remember:
    When choosing metrics for your customer advocacy pilot, be sure to align them to your specific goals. If possible, try to connect your advocacy efforts back to retention, growth, or revenue.

    Do not choose too many metrics; one per goal should suffice.

    Ensure that you can track the metrics you select to measure - the data is available and measuring won't be overly manual or time-consuming.

    Win executive approval and implement pilot

    Step 3.2 Establish timeline and create advocate communication materials

    Total duration: 2.5-8.0 hours

    Objective
    Outline who will be involved in what roles and capacities and what tasks and activities need to completed.

    Output

    • Timeline and milestones
    • Advocate program materials

    Participants

    • Customer advocacy lead
    • Key stakeholders
    • Sales lead
    • Marketing lead
    • Customer Success lead
    • Product lead

    MarTech
    None

    Tools

    3.2.1 Establish Timeline & Milestones
    (30-60 min.)

    List & Assign
    List all key tasks, phases, and milestones on slides 13, 14, and 15 in the Executive Presentation Template.

    Include any activities that help close gaps or address pain points from slide 9 in the Executive Presentation Template.

    Assign workstream leads on slide 15 in the Executive Presentation Template.

    Finalize all tasks and activities with working team.

    3.2.2 Design & Build Advocate Program Materials
    (180-300 min.)

    Decide
    Determine materials needed to recruit advocates and explain the program to advocate candidates.

    Determine the types of acts of advocacy you are looking for.

    Determine incentives/rewards that will be provided to advocates, such as access to new products or services.

    Build
    Build out all communication materials.

    Obtain incentives.

    Tips & Reminders

    1. When determining incentives, use the validated ideal advocate profile for guidance (i.e. what motivates your advocates?).
    2. Ensure to leave a buffer in the timeline if the need to adjust course arises.

    Win executive approval and implement pilot

    Step 3.3 Implement pilot and gain executive buy-in

    Total duration: 2.5-8.0 hours

    Objective
    Successfully implement the customer advocacy pilot program and communicate results to gain approval for full-fledged program.

    Output

    • Deliver Executive Presentation
    • Successful customer advocacy pilot
    • Provide regular updates to stakeholders, executives

    Participants

    • Customer advocacy lead
    • Workstream leads

    MarTech
    May require the use of:

    • CRM or Marketing Automation Platform
    • Available and up-to-date customer database

    Tools

    3.3.1 Complete & Deliver Executive Presentation
    (60-120 min.)

    Present
    Finalize the Executive Presentation.

    Hold stakeholder meeting and introduce the program pilot.

    3.3.2 Gain Executive Buy-in
    (60-300 min.)

    Pitch
    Present the final results of the customer advocacy pilot using the Executive Presentation Template and gain approval.

    3.3.3 Implement the Customer Advocacy Program Pilot
    (30-60 min.)

    Launch
    Launch the customer advocacy program pilot. Follow the timelines and activities outlined in the Executive Presentation Template. Track/document all advocate outreach, activity, and progress against success metrics.

    Communicate
    Establish a regular cadence to communicate with steering committee, stakeholders. Use the Executive Presentation Template to present progress and resolve roadblocks if/as they arise.

    Tips & Reminders

    1. Continually collect feedback and input from advocates and stakeholders throughout the process.
    2. Don't be afraid to make changes on the go if it helps to achieve the end goal of your pilot.
    3. If the pilot program was successful, consider scaling it up and rolling it out to more customers.

    Summary of Accomplishment

    Mission Accomplished

    • You successfully launched your customer advocacy program pilot and demonstrated clear benefits and ROI. By identifying the needs of the business and aligning those needs with key customer advocacy activities, marketers and customer advocacy leaders can prioritize the most important tasks for the pilot while also identifying potential opportunities for expansion pending executive approval.
    • SoftwareReviews' comprehensive and tactical approach takes you through the steps to build the foundation for a strategic customer advocacy program. Our methodology ensures that a customer advocacy pilot is developed to deliver the desired outcomes and ROI, increasing stakeholder buy-in and setting up your organization for customer advocacy success.

    If you would like additional support, contact us and we'll make sure you get the professional expertise you need.

    Contact your account representative for more information.
    info@softwarereviews.com
    1-888-670-8889

    Related SoftwareReviews Research

    Measure and Manage the Customer Satisfaction Metrics That Matter the Most
    Understand what truly keeps your customer satisfied. Measure what matters to improve customer experience and increase satisfaction and advocacy.

    • Understand the true drivers of satisfaction and dissatisfaction among your customer segments.
    • Establish process and cadence for effective satisfaction measurement and monitoring.
    • Know where resources are needed most to improve satisfaction levels and increase retention.

    Develop the Right Message to Engage Buyers
    Sixty percent of marketers find it hard to produce high-quality content consistently. SaaS marketers have an even more difficult job due to the technical nature of content production.

    • Create more compelling and relevant content that aligns with a buyer's needs and journey.
    • Shrink marketing and sales cycles.
    • Increase the pace of content production.

    Create a Buyer Persona and Journey
    Get deeper buyer understanding and achieve product-market fit, with easier access to market and sales.

    • Reduce time and resources wasted chasing the wrong prospects.
    • Increase open and click-through rates.
    • Perform more effective sales discovery.
    • Increase win rate.

    Bibliography

    "15 Award-Winning Customer Advocacy Success Stories." Influitive, 2021. Accessed 8 June 2023.

    "Advocacy Marketing." Influitive, June 2016. Accessed 26 Oct. 2021.

    Andrews, Marcus. "42% of Companies Don’t Listen to their Customers. Yikes." HubSpot, June 2019. Accessed 2 Nov. 2021.

    "Before you leap! Webcast." Point of Reference, Sept. 2019. Accessed 4 Nov. 2021.

    "Brand Loyalty: 5 Interesting Statistics." Factory360, Jan. 2016. Accessed 2 Nov. 2021.

    Brenner, Michael. "The Data Driven Guide to Customer Advocacy." Marketing Insider Group, Sept. 2021. Accessed 3 Feb. 2022.

    Carroll, Brian. "Why Customer Advocacy Should Be at the Heart of Your Marketing." Marketing Insider Group, Sept. 2017. Accessed 3 Feb. 2022.

    Cote, Dan. "Advocacy Blooms and Business Booms When Customers and Employees Engage." Influitive, Dec. 2021. Accessed 3 Feb. 2022.

    "Customer Success Strategy Guide." ON24, Jan. 2021. Accessed 2 Nov. 2021.

    Dalao, Kat. "Customer Advocacy: The Revenue-Driving Secret Weapon." ReferralRock, June 2017. Accessed 7 Dec. 2021.

    Frichou, Flora. "Your guide to customer advocacy: What is it, and why is it important?" TrustPilot, Jan. 2020. Accessed 26 Oct. 2021.

    Gallo, Amy. "The Value of Keeping the Right Customers." Harvard Business Review, Oct. 2014. Accessed 10 March 2022.

    Huhn, Jessica. "61 B2B Referral Marketing Statistics and Quotes." ReferralRock, March 2022. Accessed 10 March 2022.

    Kemper, Grayson. "B2B Buying Process: How Businesses Purchase B2B Services and Software." Clutch, Feb. 2020. Accessed 6 Jan. 2022.

    Kettner, Kyle. "The Evolution of Ambassador Marketing." BrandChamp.io, Oct. 2018. Accessed 2 Nov. 2021.

    Landis, Taylor. "Customer Retention Marketing vs. Customer Acquisition Marketing." OutboundEngine, April 2022. Accessed 23 April 2022.

    Miels, Emily. "What is customer advocacy? Definition and strategies." Zendesk Blog, June 2021. Accessed 27 Oct. 2021.

    Mohammad, Qasim. "The 5 Biggest Obstacles to Implementing a Successful B2B Customer Advocacy Program." HubSpot, June 2018. Accessed 6 Jan. 2022.

    Murphy, Brandon. "Brand Advocacy and Social Media - 2009 GMA Conference." Deloitte, Dec. 2009. Accessed 8 June 2023.

    Patel, Neil. "Why SaaS Brand Advocacy is More Important than Ever in 2021." Neil Patel, Feb. 2021. Accessed 4 Nov. 2021.

    Pieri, Carl. "The Plain-English Guide to Customer Advocacy." HubSpot, Apr. 2020. Accessed 27 Oct. 2021.

    Schmitt, Philipp; Skiera, Bernd; Van den Bulte, Christophe. "Referral Programs and Customer Value." Wharton Journal of Marketing, Jan. 2011. Accessed 8 June 2023.

    "The Complete Guide to Customer Advocacy." Gray Group International, 2020. Accessed 15 Oct. 2021.

    "The Customer-powered Enterprise: Playbook." Influitive, Gainsight & Pendo. 2020. Accessed 26 Oct. 2021.

    "The Winning Case for a Customer Advocacy Solution." RO Innovation, 2017. Accessed 26 Oct. 2021.

    Tidey, Will. "Acquisition vs. Retention: The Importance of Customer Lifetime Value." Huify, Feb. 2018. Accessed 10 Mar. 2022.

    "What a Brand Advocate Is and Why Your Company Needs One." RockContent, Jan. 2021. Accessed 7 Feb. 2022.

    "What is Customer Advocacy? A Definition and Strategies to Implement It." Testimonial Hero, Oct. 2021. Accessed 26 Jan. 2022.

    Select and Implement a Web Experience Management Solution

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}556|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Marketing Solutions
    • Parent Category Link: /marketing-solutions
    • A company’s web presence is its front face to the world. Ensuring you have the right suite of tools for web content management, experience design, and web analytics is critical to putting your best foot forward: failing to do so will result in customer attrition and lost revenue.
    • Web Experience Management (WEM) suites are a rapidly maturing and dynamic market, with a landscape full of vendors with cutting edge solutions and diverse offerings. As a result, finding a solution that is the best fit for your organization can be a complex process.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • WEM products are not a one-size-fits-all investment: unique evaluations and customization are required in order to deploy a solution that fits your organization.
    • WEM technology often complements core CRM and marketing management products – it does not supplant it, and must augment the rest of your customer experience management portfolio.
    • Phase your WEM implementation: Start with core capabilities such as content management, then add additional capabilities for site analytics and dynamic experience.

    Impact and Result

    • Align marketing needs with identified functional requirements.
    • Implement a best-fit WEM that increases customer acquisition and retention, and provides in-depth capabilities for site analysis.
    • Optimize procurement and operations costs for the WEM platform.

    Select and Implement a Web Experience Management Solution Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should select and implement a WEM solution, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Launch the WEM project and collect requirements

    Conduct a market overview, structure the project, and gather requirements.

    • Select and Implement a Web Experience Management Solution – Phase 1: Launch the WEM Project and Collect Requirements
    • WEM Project Charter Template
    • WEM Use-Case Fit Assessment Tool

    2. Select a WEM solution

    Analyze and shortlist vendors in the space and select a WEM solution.

    • Select and Implement a Web Experience Management Solution – Phase 2: Select a WEM Solution
    • WEM Vendor Shortlist & Detailed Feature Analysis Tool
    • WEM Vendor Demo Script Template
    • WEM RFP Template

    3. Plan the WEM implementation

    Plan the implementation and evaluate project metrics.

    • Select and Implement a Web Experience Management Solution – Phase 3: Plan the WEM Implementation
    • WEM Work Breakdown Structure Template
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Select and Implement a Web Experience Management Solution

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Launch of the WEM Selection Project

    The Purpose

    Discuss the general project overview for the WEM selection.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Launch of your WEM selection project.

    Development of your organization’s WEM requirements.

    Activities

    1.1 Facilitation of activities from the Launch the WEM Project and Collect Requirements phase, including project scoping and resource planning.

    1.2 Conduct overview of the WEM market landscape, trends, and vendors.

    1.3 Conduct process mapping for selected marketing processes.

    1.4 Interview business stakeholders.

    1.5 Prioritize WEM functional requirements.

    Outputs

    WEM Procurement Project Charter

    WEM Use-Case Fit Assessment

    2 Plan the Procurement and Implementation Process

    The Purpose

    Plan the procurement and the implementation of the WEM solution.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Selection of a WEM solution.

    A plan for implementing the selected WEM solution.

    Activities

    2.1 Complete marketing process mapping with business stakeholders.

    2.2 Interview IT staff and project team, identify technical requirements for the WEM suite, and document high-level solution requirements.

    2.3 Perform a use-case scenario assessment, review use-case scenario results, identify use-case alignment, and review the WEM Vendor Landscape vendor profiles and performance.

    2.4 Create a custom vendor shortlist and investigate additional vendors for exploration in the marketplace.

    2.5 Meet with project manager to discuss results and action items.

    Outputs

    Vendor Shortlist

    WEM RFP

    Vendor Evaluations

    Selection of a WEM Solution

    WEM projected work break-down

    Implementation plan

    Framework for WEM deployment and CRM/Marketing Management Suite Integration

    Train Managers to Strengthen Employee Relationships to Improve Engagement

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}545|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Engage
    • Parent Category Link: /engage
    • The responsibility of employee engagement has been on the shoulders of HR and the executive team for years, but managers, not HR or executives, should be primarily responsible for employee engagement.
    • Managers often fail to take steps to improve due to the following reasons:
      • They don’t understand the impact they can have on engagement.
      • They don’t understand the value of an engaged workforce.
      • They don’t feel that they are responsible for engagement.
      • They don’t know what steps they can personally take to improve engagement levels.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Managers have a large impact on employee engagement and retention. According to McLean & Company’s engagement data, every 10% increase in the category “my manager inspires me to improve” resulted in a 3.6% increase in an employee’s intent to stay.
    • To improve the manager relationship driver, managers cannot abdicate the responsibility of strengthening relationships with employees to HR – they must take the ownership role.

    Impact and Result

    • When an organization focuses on strengthening manager relationships with employees, managers should be the owner and IT leadership should be the facilitator.
    • Info-Tech recommends starting with the three most important actions to improve employee trust and therefore engagement: inform employees of the why behind decisions, interact with them on a personal level, and involve them in decisions that affect them (also known as the “3 I’s”).
    • Use this blueprint to prepare to train managers on how to apply the 3 I principles and improve the score on this engagement driver.

    Train Managers to Strengthen Employee Relationships to Improve Engagement Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Make the case

    Educate managers on the impact they have on engagement.

    • Train Managers to Strengthen Employee Relationships to Improve Engagement Storyboard

    2. Prepare for the training session by understanding key concepts

    Learn the 3 I’s of engagement and understand IT leaders as role models for engagement.

    • Training Deck: Train Managers to Build Trusting Relationships to Improve Engagement

    3. Plan the training session and customize the materials

    Determine the logistics of the training session: the who, what, and where.

    • Participant Notebook: Take Ownership of Manager Relationships

    4. Track training success metrics and follow up

    Determine ways to track the impact the training has on employee engagement.

    • Training Evaluation: Manager Relationships
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Train Managers to Strengthen Employee Relationships to Improve Engagement

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Make the Case for Strengthening Manager Relationships

    The Purpose

    Educate managers on the impact they have on engagement and the relationship between employee trust and engagement.

    Identify reasons why managers fail to positively impact employee engagement.

    Inform managers of their responsibility for employee engagement.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Increased awareness of managers regarding their impact on employee engagement.

    Improved understanding of manager role.

    Creation of plan to increase employee trust and engagement.

    Activities

    1.1 Describe relationship between trust and engagement.

    1.2 Review data on manager’s impact on engagement.

    Outputs

    Gain an understanding of the 3 I’s of building trust.

    Address key objections managers might have.

    2 Prepare for the Training Session by Understanding Key Concepts and Your Role as HR

    The Purpose

    Understand key concepts for engagement, such as inform, interact, and involve.

    Use McLean & Company’s advice to get past pain points with managers.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Understand the key principles and activities in the manager training deck.

    Gain advice for dealing with pushback from managers.

    Learn about actions that you can take to adopt the 3 I’s principle and act as a role model.

    Activities

    2.1 Practice manager training exercises on informing, interacting with, and involving employees.

    Outputs

    Become familiar with and prepared to take managers through key training exercises.

    3 Plan the Training Session and Customize the Materials

    The Purpose

    Determine who will participate in the manager training session.

    Become familiar with the content in the training deck and ensure the provided examples are appropriate.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Logistics planned for your own training session.

    Your own case made more powerful by adding your engagement data to the training deck slides.

    Improved delivery of training, making it more effective and engaging for participants.

    Activities

    3.1 Consider your audience for delivering the training.

    3.2 Plan out logistics for the training session—the who, where, and when.

    Outputs

    Ensure that your training sessions include the appropriate participants.

    Deliver a smooth and successful training session.

    4 Track Training Success Metrics and Follow Up

    The Purpose

    Determine ways to track the impact the training has on employee engagement.

    Understand how to apply the 3 I’s principle across HR functions. 

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Measure the value of engagement training.

    Gain immediate feedback on employee engagement with the McLean Leadership Index.

    Determine how HR can support managers in building stronger relationships with employees.

    Activities

    4.1 Determine how HR can support management in strengthening employee relationships.

    Outputs

    Create a culture of trust throughout the organization.

    Succeed With Digital Strategy Execution

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}527|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Customer Relationship Management
    • Parent Category Link: /customer-relationship-management
    • Rising customer expectations and competitive pressures have accelerated the pace at which organizations are turning to digital transformation to drive revenue or cut costs.
    • Many digital strategies are not put into action, and instead sit on the shelf. A digital strategy that is not translated into specific projects and initiatives will provide no value to the organization.
    • Executing a digital strategy is easier said than done: IT often lacks the necessary framework to create a roadmap, or fails to understand how new applications can enable the vision outlined in the strategy.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • A digital strategy needs a clear roadmap to succeed. Too many digital strategies are lofty statements of objective with no clear avenue for actual execution: create a digital strategy application roadmap to avoid this pitfall.
    • Understand the art of execution. Application capabilities are rapidly evolving: IT must stand ready to educate the business on how new applications can be used to pursue the digital strategy.

    Impact and Result

    • IT must work with the business to parse specific technology drivers from the digital strategy, distill strategic requirements, and create a prescriptive roadmap of initiatives that will close the gaps between the current state and the target state outlined in the digital strategy. Doing so well is a path to the CIO’s office.
    • To better serve the organization, IT leaders must stay abreast of key application capabilities and trends. Exciting new developments such as artificial intelligence, IoT, and machine learning have opened up new avenues for process digitization, but IT leaders need to make a concerted effort to understand what modern applications bring to the table for technology enablement of the digital strategy.
    • Taking an agile approach to application roadmap development will help to provide a clear path forward for tackling digital strategy execution, while also allowing for flexibility to update and iterate as the internal and external environment changes.

    Succeed With Digital Strategy Execution Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should have a structured approach to translating your digital strategy to specific application initiatives, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Parse digital strategy drivers

    Parse specific technology drivers out of the formal enterprise digital strategy.

    • Succeed With Digital Strategy Execution – Phase 1: Parse Your Digital Strategy for Critical Technology Drivers

    2. Map drivers to enabling technologies

    Review and understand potential enabling applications.

    • Succeed With Digital Strategy Execution – Phase 2: Map Your Drivers to Enabling Applications

    3. Create the application roadmap to support the digital strategy

    Use the drivers and an understanding of enabling applications to put together an execution roadmap that will support the digital strategy.

    • Succeed With Digital Strategy Execution – Phase 3: Create an Application Roadmap That Supports the Digital Strategy
    • Digital Strategy Roadmap Tool
    • Application Roadmap Presentation Template
    • Digital Strategy Communication and Execution Plan Template
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Succeed With Digital Strategy Execution

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Validate the Digital Strategy

    The Purpose

    Review and validate the formal enterprise digital strategy.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Confirmation of the goals, objectives, and direction of the organization’s digital strategy.

    Activities

    1.1 Review the initial digital strategy.

    1.2 Determine gaps.

    1.3 Refine digital strategy scope and vision.

    1.4 Finalize digital strategy and validate with stakeholders.

    Outputs

    Validated digital strategy

    2 Parse Critical Technology Drivers

    The Purpose

    Enumerate relevant technology drivers from the digital strategy.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    List of technology drivers to pursue based on goals articulated in the digital strategy.

    Activities

    2.1 Identify affected process domains.

    2.2 Brainstorm impacts of digital strategy on technology enablement.

    2.3 Distill critical technology drivers.

    2.4 Identify KPIs for each driver.

    Outputs

    Affected process domains (based on APQC)

    Critical technology drivers for the digital strategy

    3 Map Drivers to Enabling Applications

    The Purpose

    Relate your digital strategy drivers to specific, actionable application areas.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Understand the interplay between the digital strategy and impacted application domains.

    Activities

    3.1 Build and review current application inventory for digital.

    3.2 Execute fit-gap analysis between drivers and current state inventory.

    3.3 Pair technology drivers to specific enabling application categories.

    Outputs

    Current-state application inventory

    Fit-gap analysis

    4 Understand Applications

    The Purpose

    Understand how different applications support the digital strategy.

    Understand the art of the possible.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Knowledge of how applications are evolving from a features and capabilities perspective, and how this pertains to digital strategy enablement.

    Activities

    4.1 Application spotlight: customer experience.

    4.2 Application spotlight: content and collaboration.

    4.3 Application spotlight: business intelligence.

    4.4 Application spotlight: enterprise resource planning.

    Outputs

    Application spotlights

    5 Build the Digital Application Roadmap

    The Purpose

    Create a concrete, actionable roadmap of application and technology initiatives to move the digital strategy forward.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Clear, concise articulation of application roadmap for supporting digital that can be communicated to the business.

    Activities

    5.1 Build list of enabling projects and applications.

    5.2 Create prioritization criteria.

    5.3 Build the digital strategy application roadmap.

    5.4 Socialize the roadmap.

    5.5 Delineate responsibility for roadmap execution.

    Outputs

    Application roadmap for the digital strategy

    RACI chart for digital strategy roadmap execution

    Tech Trend Update: If Contact Tracing Then Distributed Trust

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}424|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: DR and Business Continuity
    • Parent Category Link: /business-continuity

    With COVID-19's rapid spread through populations, governments are looking for technology tools that can augment the efforts of manual contact tracing processes. How the system is designed is crucial to a positive outcome.

    • CIOs must understand how distributed trust principles achieve embedded privacy and help encourage user adoption.
    • CEOs must consider how society's waning trust in institutions affects the way they engage their customers.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    Mobile contact tracing apps that use a decentralized design approach will be the most likely to be adopted by a wide swath of the population.

    Impact and Result

    There are some key considerations to realize from the way different governments are approaching contact tracing:

    1. If centralized, then seek to ensure privacy protections.
    2. If decentralized, then seek to enable collaboration.
    3. In either case, put in place data governance to create trust.

    Tech Trend Update: If Contact Tracing Then Distributed Trust Research & Tools

    Learn why distributed trust is becoming critical to technology systems design

    Understand the differences between mobile app architectures available to developers and how to achieve success in implementation based on your goals.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    • Tech Trend Update: If Contact Tracing Then Distributed Trust Storyboard
    [infographic]

    Design and Implement a Business-Aligned Security Program

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}368|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Security Strategy & Budgeting
    • Parent Category Link: /security-strategy-and-budgeting
    • You need to build a security program that enables business services and secures the technology that makes them possible.
    • Building an effective, business-aligned security program requires that you coordinate many components, including technologies, processes, organizational structures, information flows, and behaviors.
    • The program must prioritize the right capabilities, and support its implementation with clear accountabilities, roles, and responsibilities.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Common security frameworks focus on operational controls rather than business value creation, are difficult to convey to stakeholders, and provide little implementation guidance.
    • A security strategy can provide a snapshot of your program, but it won’t help you modernize or transform it, or align it to meet emerging business requirements.
    • There is no unique, one-size-fits-all security program. Each organization has a distinct character and profile and differs from others in several critical respects.

    Impact and Result

    Tailor your security program according to what makes your organization unique.

    • Analyze critical design factors to determine and refine the scope of your security program and prioritize core program capabilities.
    • Identify program accountabilities, roles, and responsibilities.
    • Build an implementation roadmap to ensure its components work together in a systematic way to meet business requirements.

    Design and Implement a Business-Aligned Security Program Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Design and Implement a Business-Aligned Security Strategy – A step-by-step guide on how to understand what makes your organization unique and design a security program with capabilities that create business value.

    This storyboard will help you lay foundations for your security program that will inform future security program decisions and give your leadership team the information they need to support your success. You will evaluate design factors that make your organization unique, prioritize the security capabilities to suit, and assess the maturity of key security program components including security governance, security strategy, security architecture, service design, and service metrics.

    • Design and Implement a Business-Aligned Security Program Storyboard

    2. Security Program Design Tool – Tailor the security program to what makes your organization unique to ensure business-alignment.

    Use this Excel workbook to evaluate your security program against ten key design factors. The tool will produce a goals cascade that shows the relationship between business and security goals, a prioritized list of security capabilities that align to business requirements, and a list of program accountabilities.

    • Security Program Design Tool

    3. Security Program Design and Implementation Plan – Assess the current state of different security program components, plan next steps, and communicate the outcome to stakeholders.

    This second Excel workbook will help you conduct a gap analysis on key security program components and identify improvement initiatives. You can then use the Security Program Design and Implementation Plan to collect results from the design and implementation tools and draft a communication deck.

    • Security Program Implementation Tool
    • Security Program Design and Implementation Plan

    Infographic

    Workshop: Design and Implement a Business-Aligned Security Program

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Initial Security Program Design

    The Purpose

    Determine the initial design of your security program.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    An initial prioritized list of security capabilities that aligns with enterprise strategy and goals.

    Activities

    1.1 Review Info-Tech diagnostic results.

    1.2 Identify project context.

    1.3 Identify enterprise strategy.

    1.4 Identify enterprise goals.

    1.5 Build a goal cascade.

    1.6 Assess the risk profile.

    1.7 Identify IT-related issues.

    1.8 Evaluate initial program design.

    Outputs

    Stakeholder satisfaction with program

    Situation, challenges, opportunities

    Initial set of prioritized security capabilities

    Initial set of prioritized security capabilities

    Initial set of prioritized security capabilities

    Initial set of prioritized security capabilities

    Initial set of prioritized security capabilities

    Initial set of prioritized security capabilities

    2 Refine Security Program Capabilities

    The Purpose

    Refine the design of your security program.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A refined, prioritized list of security capabilities that reflects what makes your organization unique.

    Activities

    2.1 Gauge threat landscape.

    2.2 Identify compliance requirements.

    2.3 Categorize the role of IT.

    2.4 Identify the sourcing model.

    2.5 Identify the IT implementation model.

    2.6 Identify the tech adoption strategy.

    2.7 Refine the scope of the program.

    Outputs

    Refined set of prioritized security capabilities

    Refined set of prioritized security capabilities

    Refined set of prioritized security capabilities

    Refined set of prioritized security capabilities

    Refined set of prioritized security capabilities

    Refined set of prioritized security capabilities

    Refined set of prioritized security capabilities

    3 Security Program Gap Analysis

    The Purpose

    Finalize security program design.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Key accountabilities to support the security program

    Gap analysis to produce an improvement plan

    Activities

    3.1 Identify program accountabilities.

    3.2 Conduct program gap analysis.

    3.3 Prioritize initiatives.

    Outputs

    Documented program accountabilities.

    Security program gap analysis

    Security program gap analysis

    4 Roadmap and Implementation Plan

    The Purpose

    Create and communicate an improvement roadmap for the security program.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Security program design and implementation plan to organize and communicate program improvements.

    Activities

    4.1 Build program roadmap

    4.2 Finalize implementation plan

    4.3 Sponsor check-in

    Outputs

    Roadmap of program improvement initiatives

    Roadmap of program improvement initiatives

    Communication deck for program design and implementation

    Further reading

    Design a Business-Aligned Security Program

    Focus on business value first.

    EXECUTIVE BRIEF

    Analyst Perspective

    Business alignment is no accident.

    Michel Hébert

    Security leaders often tout their choice of technical security framework as the first and most important program decision they make. While the right framework can help you take a snapshot of the maturity of your program and produce a quick strategy and roadmap, it won’t help you align, modernize, or transform your program to meet emerging business requirements.

    Common technical security frameworks focus on operational controls rather than business services and value creation. They are difficult to convey to business stakeholders and provide little program management or implementation guidance.

    Focus on business value first, and the security services that enable it. Your organization has its own distinct character and profile. Understand what makes your organization unique, then design and refine the design of your security program to ensure it supports the right capabilities. Next, collaborate with stakeholders to ensure the right accountabilities, roles, and responsibilities are in place to support the implementation of the security program.

    Michel Hébert
    Research Director, Security & Privacy
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    Common Obstacles

    Info-Tech’s Approach

    • You need to build a security program that enables business services and secures the technology that makes them possible.
    • Building an effective, business-aligned security program requires that you coordinate many components, including technologies, processes, organizational structures, information flows, and behaviors.
    • The program must prioritize the right capabilities, and support its implementation with clear accountabilities, roles, and responsibilities.
    • Common security frameworks focus on operational controls rather than business value creation, are difficult to convey to stakeholders, and provide little implementation guidance.
    • A security strategy can provide a snapshot of your program, but it won’t help you modernize or transform it, or align it to meet emerging business requirements.
    • There is no unique, one-size-fits-all security program. Each organization has a distinct character and profile and differs from others in several critical respects.

    Tailor your security program according to what makes your organization unique.

    • Analyze critical design factors to determine and refine the design of your security program and prioritize core program capabilities.
    • Identify program accountabilities, roles, and responsibilities.
    • Build an implementation roadmap to ensure its components work together in a systematic way to meet business requirements.

    Info-Tech Insight

    You are a business leader who supports business goals and mitigates risk. Focus first on business value and the security services that enable it, not security controls.

    Your challenge

    The need for a solid and responsive security program has never been greater.

    • You need to build a security program that enables business services and secures the technology that makes them possible.
    • Building an effective, business-aligned security program requires that you coordinate many components, including technologies, processes, organizational structures, information flows, and behaviors.
    • The program must prioritize the right capabilities, and support its implementation with clear accountabilities, roles, and responsibilities.
    • You must communicate effectively with stakeholders to describe the risks the organization faces, their likely impact on organizational goals, and how the security program will mitigate those risks and support the creation of business value.
    • Ransomware is a persistent threat to organizations worldwide across all industries.
    • Cybercriminals deploying ransomware are evolving into a growing and sophisticated criminal ecosystem that will continue to adapt to maximize its profits.

    • Critical infrastructure is increasingly at risk.
    • Malicious agents continue to target critical infrastructure to harm industrial processes and the customers they serve State-sponsored actors are expected to continue to target critical infrastructure to collect information through espionage, pre-position in case of future hostilities, and project state power.

    • Disruptive technologies bring new threats.
    • Malicious actors increasingly deceive or exploit cryptocurrencies, machine learning, and artificial intelligence technologies to support their activities.

    Sources: CCCS (2023), CISA (2023), ENISA (2023)

    Your challenge

    Most security programs are not aligned with the overall business strategy.

    50% Only half of leaders are framing the impact of security threats as a business risk.

    49% Less than half of leaders align security program cost and risk reduction targets with the business.

    57% Most leaders still don’t regularly review security program performance of the business.

    Source: Tenable, 2021

    Common obstacles

    Misalignment is hurting your security program and making you less influential.

    Organizations with misaligned security programs have 48% more security incidents...

    …and the cost of their data breaches are 40% higher than those with aligned programs.

    37% of stakeholders still lack confidence in their security program.

    54% of senior leaders still doubt security gets the goals of the organization.

    Source: Frost & Sullivan, 2019
    Source: Ponemon, 2023

    Common obstacles

    Common security frameworks won’t help you align your program.

    • Common security frameworks focus on operational controls rather than business value creation, are difficult to convey to stakeholders, and provide little implementation guidance.
    • A security strategy based on the right framework can provide a snapshot of your program, but it won’t help you modernize, transform, or align your program to meet emerging business requirements.
    • The lack of guidance leads to a lack of structure in the way security services are designed and managed, which reduces service quality, increases security friction, and reduces business satisfaction.

    There is no unique, one-size-fits-all security program.

    • Each organization has a distinct character and profile and differs from others in several critical respects. The security program for a cloud-first, DevOps environment must emphasize different capabilities and accountabilities than one for an on-premise environment and a traditional implementation model.

    Info-Tech’s approach

    You are a business leader who supports business goals and mitigates risk.

    • Understand what makes your organization unique, then design and refine a security program with capabilities that create business value.
    • Next, collaborate with stakeholders to ensure the right accountabilities, roles, and responsibilities are in place, and build an implementation roadmap to ensure its components work together over time.

    Security needs to evolve as a business strategy.

    • Laying the right foundations for your security program will inform future security program decisions and give your leadership team the information they need to support your success. You can do it in two steps:
      • Evaluate the design factors that make your organization unique and prioritize the security capabilities to suit. Info-Tech’s approach is based on the design process embedded in the latest COBIT framework.
      • Review the key components of your security program, including security governance, security strategy, security architecture, service design, and service metrics.

    If you build it, they will come

    “There's so much focus on better risk management that every leadership team in every organization wants to be part of the solution.

    If you can give them good data about what things they really need to do, they will work to understand it and help you solve the problem.”

    Dan Bowden, CISO, Sentara Healthcare (Tenable)

    Design a Business-Aligned Security Program

    The image contains a screenshot of how to Design a business-aligned security program.


    Choose your own adventure

    This blueprint is ideal for new CISOs and for program modernization initiatives.

    1. New CISO

    “I need to understand the business, prioritize core security capabilities, and identify program accountabilities quickly.”

    2. Program Renewal

    “The business is changing, and the threat landscape is shifting. I am concerned the program is getting stale.”

    Use this blueprint to understand what makes your organization unique:

    1. Prioritize security capabilities.
    2. Identify program accountabilities.
    3. Plan program implementation.

    If you need a deep dive into governance, move on to a security governance and management initiative.

    3. Program Update

    “I am happy with the fundamentals of my security program. I need to assess and improve our security posture.”

    Move on to our guidance on how to Build an Information Security Strategy instead.

    Info-Tech’s methodology for security program design

    Define Scope of
    Security Program

    Refine Scope of
    Security Program

    Finalize Security
    Program Design

    Phase steps

    1.1 Identify enterprise strategy

    1.2 Identify enterprise goals

    1.3 Assess the risk profile

    1.4 Identify IT-related issues

    1.5 Define initial program design

    2.1 Gage threats and compliance

    2.2 Assess IT role and sourcing

    2.3 Assess IT implementation model

    2.4 Assess tech adoption strategy

    2.5 Refine program design

    3.1 Identify program accountabilities

    3.2 Define program target state

    3.3 Build program roadmap

    Phase outcomes

    • Initial security program design
    • Refined security program design
    • Prioritized set of security capabilities
    • Program accountabilities
    • Program gap closure initiatives

    Tools

    Insight Map

    You are a business leader first and a security leader second

    Technical security frameworks are static and focused on operational controls and standards. They belong in your program’s solar system but not at its center. Design your security program with business value and the security services that enable it in mind, not security controls.

    There is no one-size-fits-all security program
    Tailor your security program to your organization’s distinct profile to ensure the program generates value.

    Lay the right foundations to increase engagement
    Map out accountabilities, roles, and responsibilities to ensure the components of your security program work together over time to secure and enable business services.

    If you build it, they will come
    Your executive team wants to be part of the solution. If you give them reliable data for the things they really need to do, they will work to understand and help you solve the problem.

    Blueprint deliverables

    Info-Tech supports project and workshop activities with deliverables to help you accomplish your goals and accelerate your success.

    Security Program Design Tool

    Tailor the security program to what makes your organization unique to ensure alignment.

    The image contains a screenshot of the Security Program Design Tool.

    Security Program Implementation Tool

    Assess the current state of different security program components and plan next steps.



    SecurityProgram Design and Implementation Plan

    Communicate capabilities, accountabilities, and implementation initiatives.

    The image contains a screenshot of the Security Program Design and Implementation Plan.

    Key deliverable

    Security Program Design and Implementation Plan

    The design and implementation plan captures the key insights your work will generate, including:

    • A prioritized set of security capabilities aligned to business requirements.
    • Security program accountabilities.
    • Security program implementation initiatives.

    Blueprint benefits

    IT Benefits

    Business Benefits

    • Laying the right foundations for your security program will:
      • Inform the future security governance, security strategy, security architecture, and service design decisions you need to make.
      • Improve security service design and service quality, reduce security friction, and increase business satisfaction with the security program.
      • Help you give your leadership team the information they need to support your success.
      • Improve the standing of the security program with business leaders.
    • Organizations with a well-aligned security program:
      • Improve security risk management, performance measurement, resource management, and value delivery.
      • Lower rates of security incidents and lower-cost security breaches.
      • Align costs, performance, and risk reduction objectives with business needs.
      • Are more satisfied with their security program.

    Measure the value of using Info-Tech’s approach

    Assess the effectiveness of your security program with a risk-based approach.

    Deliverable

    Challenge

    Security Program Design

    • Prioritized set of security capabilities
    • Program accountabilities
    • Devise and deploy an approach to gather business requirements, identify and prioritize relevant security capabilities, and assign program accountabilities.
    • Cost and Effort : 2 FTEs x 90 days x $130,000/year

    Program Assessment and Implementation Plan

    • Security program assessment
    • Roadmap of gap closure initiatives
    • Devise and deploy an approach to assess the current state of your security program, identify gap closure or improvement initiatives, and build a transformation roadmap.
    • Cost and Effort : 2 FTEs x 90 days x $130,000/year

    Measured Value

    • Using Info-Tech’s best practice methodology will cut the cost and effort in half.
    • Savings: 2 FTEs x 45 days x $130,000/year = $65,000

    Measure the impact of your project

    Use Info-Tech diagnostics before and after the engagement to measure your progress.

    • Info-Tech diagnostics are standardized surveys that produce historical and industry trends against which to benchmark your organization.
    • Run the Security Business Satisfaction and Alignment diagnostic now, and again in twelve months to assess business satisfaction with the security program and measure the impact of your program improvements.
    • Reach out to your account manager or follow the link to deploy the diagnostic and measure your success. Diagnostics are included in your membership.

    Inform this step with Info-Tech diagnostic results

    • Info-Tech diagnostics are standardized surveys that accelerate the process of gathering and analyzing pain point data.
    • Diagnostics also produce historical and industry trends against which to benchmark your organization.
    • Reach out to your account manager or follow the links to deploy some or all these diagnostics to validate your assumptions. Diagnostics are included in your membership.

    Governance & Management Maturity Scorecard
    Understand the maturity of your security program across eight domains.
    Audience: Security Manager

    Security Business Satisfaction and Alignment Report
    Assess the organization’s satisfaction with the security program.
    Audience: Business Leaders

    CIO Business Vision
    Assess the organization’s satisfaction with IT services and identify relevant challenges.
    Audience: Business Leaders

    Executive Brief Case Study

    INDUSTRY: Higher Education

    SOURCE: Interview

    Building a business-aligned security program

    Portland Community College (PCC) is the largest post-secondary institution in Oregon and serves more than 50,000 students each year. The college has a well-established information technology program, which supports its education mission in four main campuses and several smaller centers.

    PCC launched a security program modernization effort to deal with the evolving threat landscape in higher education. The CISO studied the enterprise strategy and goals and reviewed the college’s risk profile and compliance requirements. The exercise helped the organization prioritize security capabilities for the renewal effort and informed the careful assessment of technical controls in the current security program.

    Results

    Laying the right foundations for the security program helped the security function understand how to provide the organization with a clear report of its security posture. The CISO now reports directly to the board of directors and works with stakeholders to align cost, performance, and risk reduction objectives with the needs of the college.

    The security program modernization effort prioritized several critical design factors

    • Enterprise Strategy
    • Enterprise Goals
    • IT Risk Profile
    • IT-Related Issues
    • IT Threat Landscape
    • Compliance Requirements

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    “Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful.”

    Guided Implementation

    “Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track.”

    Workshop

    “We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place.”

    Consulting

    “Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project.”

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

    Guided Implementation

    What does a typical GI on this topic look like?

    Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3

    Call #1:
    Scope requirements, objectives, and specific challenges.

    Call #2:
    Define business context, assess risk profile, and identify existing security issues.

    Define initial design of security program.

    Call #3:
    Evaluate threat landscape and compliance requirements.

    Call #4:
    Analyze the role of IT, the security sourcing model, technology adoption, and implementation models.

    Refine the design of the security program.

    Call #5:
    Identify program accountabilities.

    Call #6:
    Design program target state and draft security program implementation plan.

    A Guided Implementation (GI) is a series of calls with an Info-Tech analyst to help implement our best practices in your organization.

    A typical GI is 4 to 6 calls over the course of 6 months.

    Workshop Overview

    Contact your account representative for more information.
    workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8889

    Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5

    Initial Security
    Program Design

    Refine Security
    Program Design

    Security Program
    Gap Analysis

    Roadmap and Implementation Plan

    Next Steps and
    Wrap-Up (offsite)

    Activities

    1.1.0 Review Info-Tech diagnostic results

    1.1.1 Identify project context

    1.1.2 Identify enterprise strategy

    1.2.1 Identify enterprise goals

    1.2.2 Build a goals cascade

    1.3 Assess the risk profile

    1.4 Identify IT-related issues

    1.5 Evaluate initial program design

    2.1.1 Gauge threat landscape

    2.1.2 Identify compliance requirements

    2.2.1 Categorize the role of IT

    2.2.2 Identify the sourcing model

    2.3.1 Identify the IT implementation model

    2.4.1 Identify the tech adoption strategy

    2.5.1 Refine the design of the program

    3.1 Identify program accountabilities

    3.2.1 Conduct program gap analysis

    3.2.2 Prioritize initiatives

    3.3.1 Build program roadmap

    3.3.2 Finalize implementation plan

    3.3.3 Sponsor check-in

    4.1 Complete in-progress deliverables from previous four days

    4.2 Set up review time for workshop deliverables and to discuss next steps

    Deliverables

    1. Project context
    2. Stakeholder satisfaction feedback on security program
    3. Initial set of prioritized security capabilities
    1. Refined set of prioritized security capabilities
    1. Documented program accountabilities
    2. Security program gap analysis
    1. Roadmap of initiatives
    2. Communication deck for program design and implementation
    1. Completed security program design
    2. Security program design and implementation plan

    Customize your journey

    The security design blueprint pairs well with security governance and security strategy.

    • The prioritized set of security capabilities you develop during the program design project will inform efforts to develop other parts of your security program, like the security governance and management program and the security strategy.
    • Work with your member services director, executive advisor, or technical counselor to scope the journey you need. They will work with you to align the subject matter experts to support your roadmap and workshops.

    Workshop
    Days 1 and 2

    Workshop
    Days 3 and 4

    Security Program Design Factors

    Security Program Gap Analysis or
    Security Governance and Management

    Drive Real Business Value with an HRIS Strategy

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}586|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.1/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $43,457 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 36 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Human Resource Systems
    • Parent Category Link: /human-resource-systems
    • In most organizations, the HR application portfolio has evolved tactically on an as-needed basis, resulting in un-integrated systems and significant effort spent on manual workarounds.
    • The relationship between HR and IT is not optimal for technology decision making. System-related decisions are made by HR and IT is typically involved only post-purchase to fix issues as they arise and offer workarounds.
    • IT systems for HR are not viewed as a strategic differentiator or business enabler, thereby leading to a limited budget and resources for HR IT systems and subsequently hindering the adoption of a strategic, holistic perspective.
    • Some organizations overinvest, while others underinvest in lightweight, point-to-point solutions. Finding the sweet spot between a full suite and lightweight functionality is no easy task.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Align HRIS goals with the business. Organizations must position HR as a partner prior to embarking on an HRIS initiative, aligning technology goals with organizational objectives before looking at software.
    • Communication is key. Often, HR and IT speak different languages. Maintain a high degree of communication by engaging stakeholder groups early.
    • Plan where you want to go. Designing a roadmap based on clear requirements, alignment with the business, and an understanding of priorities will contribute to success.

    Impact and Result

    • Evaluate the current state of HRIS, understand the pain points, and visualize your ideal processes prior to choosing a solution.
    • Explore the different solution alternatives: maintain current system, integrate and consolidate, augment, or replace system entirely.
    • Create a plan to engage IT and HR throughout the project. Equip HR with the decision-making tools to meet business objectives and drive business strategy. Establish a common language for IT and HR to effectively communicate.
    • Develop a practical and actionable roadmap that the entire organization can buy into.

    Drive Real Business Value with an HRIS Strategy Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should develop an HRIS strategy, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Conduct an environmental scan

    Create a clear project vision that outlines the goals and objectives for the HRIS strategy. Subsequently, construct an HRIS business model that is informed by enablers, barriers, and the organizational, IT, and HR needs.

    • Drive Real Business Value with an HRIS Strategy – Phase 1: Conduct an Environmental Scan
    • Establish an HRIS Strategy Project Charter Template
    • HRIS Readiness Assessment Checklist

    2. Design the future state

    Gather high-level requirements to determine the ideal future state. Explore solution alternatives and choose the path that is best aligned with the organization's needs.

    • Drive Real Business Value with an HRIS Strategy – Phase 2: Design the Future State
    • HRIS Strategy Stakeholder Interview Guide
    • Process Owner Assignment Guide

    3. Finalize the roadmap

    Identify roadmap initiatives. Prioritize initiatives based on importance and effort.

    • Drive Real Business Value with an HRIS Strategy – Phase 3: Finalize the Roadmap
    • Initiative Roadmap Tool
    • HRIS Stakeholder Presentation Template
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Drive Real Business Value with an HRIS Strategy

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Conduct an Environmental Scan

    The Purpose

    Understand the importance of creating an HRIS strategy before proceeding with software selection and implementation.

    Learn why a large percentage of HRIS projects fail and how to avoid common mistakes.

    Set expectations for the HRIS strategy and understand Info-Tech’s HRIS methodology.

    Complete a project charter to gain buy-in, build a project team, and track project success.   

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A go/no-go decision on the project appropriateness.

    Project stakeholders identified.

    Project team created with defined roles and responsibilities.

    Finalized project charter to gain buy-in.  

    Activities

    1.1 Set a direction for the project by clarifying the focus.

    1.2 Identify the right stakeholders for your project team.

    1.3 Identify HRIS needs, barriers, and enablers.

    1.4 Map the current state of your HRIS.

    1.5 Align your business goals with your HR goals and objectives.

    Outputs

    Project vision

    Defined project roles and responsibilities

    Completed HRIS business model

    Completed current state map and thorough understanding of the HR technology landscape

    Strategy alignment between HR and the business

    2 Design the Future State

    The Purpose

    Gain a thorough understanding of the HRIS-related pains felt throughout the organization.

    Use stakeholder-identified pains to directly inform the HRIS strategy and long-term solution.

    Visualize your ideal processes and realize the art of the possible.  

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Requirements to strengthen the business case and inform the strategy.

    The art of the possible.

    Activities

    2.1 Requirements gathering.

    2.2 Sketch ideal future state processes.

    2.3 Establish process owners.

    2.4 Determine guiding principles.

    2.5 Identify metrics.

    Outputs

    Pain points classified by data, people, process, and technology

    Ideal future process vision

    Assigned process owners, guiding principles, and metrics for each HR process in scope

    3 Create Roadmap and Finalize Deliverable

    The Purpose

    Brainstorm and prioritize short- and long-term HRIS tasks.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Understand next steps for the HRIS project.

    Activities

    3.1 Create a high-level implementation plan that shows dependencies.

    3.2 Identify risks and mitigation efforts.

    3.3 Finalize stakeholder presentation.

    Outputs

    Completed implementation plan

    Completed risk management plan

    HRIS stakeholder presentation

    Implement a New IT Organizational Structure

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}276|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 10.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $30,999 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 5 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Organizational Design
    • Parent Category Link: /organizational-design
    • Organizational design implementations can be highly disruptive for IT staff and business partners. Without a structured approach, IT leaders may experience high turnover, decreased productivity, and resistance to the change.
    • CIOs walk a tightrope as they manage the operational and emotional turbulence while aiming to improve business satisfaction within IT. Failure to achieve balance could result in irreparable failure.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Mismanagement will hurt you. The majority of IT organizations do not manage organizational design implementations effectively, resulting in decreased satisfaction, productivity loss, and increased IT costs.
    • Preventing mismanagement is within your control. 72% of change management issues can be directly improved by managers. IT leaders have a tendency to focus their efforts on operational changes rather than on people.

    Impact and Result

    Leverage Info-Tech’s organizational design implementation process and deliverables to build and implement a detailed transition strategy and to prepare managers to lead through change.

    Follow Info-Tech’s 5-step process to:

    1. Effect change and sustain productivity through real-time employee engagement monitoring.
    2. Kick off the organizational design implementation with effective communication.
    3. Build an integrated departmental transition strategy.
    4. Train managers to effectively lead through change.
    5. Develop personalized transition plans.

    Implement a New IT Organizational Structure Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out how you should implement a new organizational design, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Build a change communication strategy

    Create strategies to communicate the changes to staff and maintain their level of engagement.

    • Implement a New Organizational Structure – Phase 1: Build a Change Communication Strategy
    • Organizational Design Implementation FAQ
    • Organizational Design Implementation Kick-Off Presentation

    2. Build the organizational transition plan

    Build a holistic list of projects that will enable the implementation of the organizational structure.

    • Implement a New Organizational Structure – Phase 2: Build the Organizational Transition Plan
    • Organizational Design Implementation Project Planning Tool

    3. Lead staff through the reorganization

    Lead a workshop to train managers to lead their staff through the changes and build transition plans for all staff members.

    • Implement a New Organizational Structure – Phase 3: Lead Staff Through the Reorganization
    • Organizational Design Implementation Manager Training Guide
    • Organizational Design Implementation Stakeholder Engagement Plan Template
    • Organizational Design Implementation Transition Plan Template
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Implement a New IT Organizational Structure

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Build Your Change Project Plan

    The Purpose

    Create a holistic change project plan to mitigate the risks of organizational change.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Building a change project plan that encompasses both the operational changes and minimizes stakeholder and employee resistance to change.

    Activities

    1.1 Review the new organizational structure.

    1.2 Determine the scope of your organizational changes.

    1.3 Review your MLI results.

    1.4 Brainstorm a list of projects to enable the change.

    Outputs

    Project management planning and monitoring tool

    McLean Leadership Index dashboard

    2 Finalize Change Project Plan

    The Purpose

    Finalize the change project plan started on day 1.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Finalize the tasks that need to be completed as part of the change project.

    Activities

    2.1 Brainstorm the tasks that are contained within the change projects.

    2.2 Determine the resource allocations for the projects.

    2.3 Understand the dependencies of the projects.

    2.4 Create a progress monitoring schedule.

    Outputs

    Completed project management planning and monitoring tool

    3 Enlist Your Implementation Team

    The Purpose

    Enlist key members of your team to drive the implementation of your new organizational design.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Mitigate the risks of staff resistance to the change and low engagement that can result from major organizational change projects.

    Activities

    3.1 Determine the members that are best suited for the team.

    3.2 Build a RACI to define their roles.

    3.3 Create a change vision.

    3.4 Create your change communication strategy.

    Outputs

    Communication strategy

    4 Train Your Managers to Lead Through Change

    The Purpose

    Train your managers who are more technically focused to handle the people side of the change.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Leverage your managers to translate how the organizational change will directly impact individuals on their teams.

    Activities

    4.1 Conduct the manager training workshop with managers.

    4.2 Review the stakeholder engagement plans.

    4.3 Review individual transition plan template with managers.

    Outputs

    Conflict style self-assessments

    Stakeholder engagement plans

    Individual transition plan template

    5 Build Your Transition Plans

    The Purpose

    Complete transition plans for individual members of your staff.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Create individual plans for your staff members to ease the transition into their new roles.

    Activities

    5.1 Bring managers back in to complete transition plans.

    5.2 Revisit the new organizational design as a source of information.

    5.3 Complete aspects of the templates that do not require staff feedback.

    5.4 Discuss strategies for transitioning.

    Outputs

    Individual transition plan template

    Further reading

    Implement a New IT Organizational Structure

    Prioritize quick wins and critical services during IT org changes.

    This blueprint is part 3/3 in Info-Tech’s organizational design program and focuses on implementing a new structure

    Part 1: Design Part 2: Structure Part 3: Implement
    IT Organizational Architecture Organizational Sketch Organizational Structure Organizational Chart Transition Strategy Implement Structure
    1. Define the organizational design objectives.
    2. Develop strategically-aligned capability map.
    3. Create the organizational design framework.
    4. Define the future state work units.
    5. Create future state work unit mandates.
    1. Assign work to work units (accountabilities and responsibilities).
    2. Develop organizational model options (organizational sketches).
    3. Assess options and select go-forward model.
    1. Define roles by work unit.
    2. Create role mandates.
    3. Turn roles into jobs.
    4. Define reporting relationships between jobs.
    5. Define competency requirements.
    1. Determine number of positions per job.
    2. Conduct competency assessment.
    3. Assign staff to jobs.
    1. Form OD implementation team.
    2. Develop change vision.
    3. Build communication presentation.
    4. Identify and plan change projects.
    5. Develop organizational transition plan.
    1. Train managers to lead through change.
    2. Define and implement stakeholder engagement plan.
    3. Develop individual transition plans.
    4. Implement transition plans.
    Risk Management: Create, implement, and monitor risk management plan.
    HR Management: Develop job descriptions, conduct job evaluation, and develop compensation packages.

    Monitor and Sustain Stakeholder Engagement →

    The sections highlighted in green are in scope for this blueprint. Click here for more information on designing or on structuring a new organization.

    Our understanding of the problem

    This Research is Designed For:

    • CIOs

    This Research Will Help You:

    • Effectively implement a new organizational structure.
    • Develop effective communications to minimize turnover and lost productivity during transition.
    • Identify a detailed transition strategy to move to your new structure with minimal interruptions to service quality.
    • Train managers to lead through change and measure ongoing employee engagement.

    This Research Will Also Assist:

    • IT Leaders

    This Research Will Help Them:

    • Effectively lead through the organizational change.
    • Manage difficult conversations with staff and mitigate staff concerns and turnover.
    • Build clear transition plans for their teams.

    Executive summary

    Situation

    • Organizational Design (OD) projects are typically undertaken in order to enable organizational priorities, improve IT performance, or to reduce IT costs. However, due to the highly disruptive nature of the change, only 25% of changes achieve their objectives over the long term. (2013 Towers Watson Change and Communication ROI Survey)

    Complication

    • OD implementations can be highly disruptive for IT staff and business partners. Without a structured approach, IT leaders may experience high turnover, decreased productivity, and resistance to the change.
    • CIOs walk a tightrope as they manage the operational and emotional turbulence while aiming to improve business satisfaction within IT. Failure to achieve balance could result in irreparable failure.

    Resolution

    • Leverage Info-Tech’s organizational design implementation process and deliverables to build and implement a detailed transition strategy and to prepare managers to lead through change. Follow Info-Tech’s 5-step process to:
      1. Effect change and sustain productivity through real-time employee engagement monitoring.
      2. Kick off the organizational design implementation with effective communication.
      3. Build an integrated departmental transition strategy.
      4. Train managers to effectively lead through change.
      5. Develop personalized transition plans.

    Info-Tech Insight

    1. Mismanagement will hurt you. The majority of IT organizations do not manage OD implementations effectively, resulting in decreased satisfaction, productivity loss, and increased IT costs.
    2. Preventing mismanagement is within your control. 72% of change management issues can be directly improved by managers. (Abilla, 2009) IT leaders have a tendency to focus their efforts on operational changes rather than on people. This is a recipe for failure.

    Organizational Design Implementation

    Managing organizational design (OD) changes effectively is critical to maintaining IT service levels and retaining top talent throughout a restructure. Nevertheless, many organizations fail to invest appropriate consideration and resources into effective OD change planning and execution.

    THREE REASONS WHY CIOS NEED TO EFFECTIVELY MANAGE CHANGE:

    1. Failure is the norm; not the exception. According to a study by Towers Watson, only 55% of organizations experience the initial value of a change. Even fewer organizations, a mere 25%, are actually able to sustain change over time to experience the full expected benefits. (2013 Towers Watson Change and Communication ROI Survey)
    2. People are the biggest cause of failure. Organizational design changes are one of the most difficult types of changes to manage as staff are often highly resistant. This leads to decreased productivity and poor results. The most significant people challenge is the loss of momentum through the change process which needs to be actively managed.
    3. Failure costs money. Poor IT OD implementations can result in increased turnover, lost productivity, and decreased satisfaction from the business. Managing the implementation has a clear ROI as the cost of voluntary turnover is estimated to be 150% of an employee’s annual salary. (Inc)

    86% of IT leaders believe organization and leadership processes are critical, yet the majority struggle to be effective

    PERCENTAGE OF IT LEADERS WHO BELIEVE THEIR ORGANIZATION AND LEADERSHIP PROCESSES ARE HIGHLY IMPORTANT AND HIGHLY EFFECTIVE

    A bar graph, with the following organization and leadership processes listed on the Y-axis: Human Resources Management; Leadership, Culture, Values; Organizational Change Management; and Organizational Design. The bar graph shows that over 80% of IT leaders rate these processes as High Importance, but less than 40% rate them as having High Effectiveness.

    GAP BETWEEN IMPORTANCE AND EFFECTIVENESS

    Human Resources Management - 61%

    Leadership, Culture, Values - 48%

    Organizational Change Management - 55%

    Organizational Design - 45%

    Note: Importance and effectiveness were determined by identifying the percentage of individuals who responded with 8-10/10 to the questions…

    • “How important is this process to the organization’s ability to achieve business and IT goals?” and…
    • “How effective is this process at helping the organization to achieve business and IT goals?”

    Source: Info-Tech Research Group, Management and Governance Diagnostic. N=22,800 IT Professionals

    Follow a structured approach to your OD implementation to improve stakeholder satisfaction with IT and minimize risk

    • IT reorganizations are typically undertaken to enable strategic goals, improve efficiency and performance, or because of significant changes to the IT budget. Without a structured approach to manage the organizational change, IT might get the implementation done, but fail to achieve the intended benefits, i.e. the operation succeeds, but the patient has died on the table.
    • When implementing your new organizational design, it’s critical to follow a structured approach to ensure that you can maintain IT service levels and performance and achieve the intended benefits.
    • The impact of organizational structure changes can be emotional and stressful for staff. As such, in order to limit voluntary turnover, and to maintain productivity and performance, IT leaders need to be strategic about how they communicate and respond to resistance to change.

    TOP 3 BENEFITS OF FOLLOWING A STRUCTURED APPROACH TO IMPLEMENTING ORGANIZATIONAL DESIGN

    1. Improved stakeholder satisfaction with IT. A detailed change strategy will allow you to successfully transition staff into new roles with limited service interruptions and with improved stakeholder satisfaction.
    2. Experience minimal voluntary turnover throughout the change. Know how to actively engage and minimize resistance of stakeholders throughout the change.
    3. Execute implementation on time and on budget. Effectively managed implementations are 65–80% more likely to meet initial objectives than those with poor organizational change management. (Boxley Group, LLC)

    Optimize your organizational design implementation results by actively preparing managers to lead through change

    IT leaders have a tendency to make change even more difficult by focusing on operations rather than on people. This is a recipe for failure. People pose the greatest risk to effective implementation and as such, IT managers need to be prepared and trained on how to lead their staff through the change. This includes knowing how to identify and manage resistance, communicating the change, and maintaining positive momentum with staff.

    Staff resistance and momentum are the most challenging part of leading through change (McLean & Company, N=196)

    A bar graph with the following aspects of Change Management listed on the Y-Axis, in increasing order of difficulty: Dealing with Technical Issues; Monitoring metrics to measure progress; Amending policies and processes; Coordinating with stakeholders; Getting buy-in from staff; Maintaining a positive momentum with staff.

    Reasons why change fails: 72% of failures can be directly improved by the manager (shmula)

    A pie chart showing the reasons why change fails: Management behavior not supportive of change = 33%; Employee resistance to change = 39%; Inadequate resources or budget = 14%; and All other obstacles = 14%.

    Leverage organizational change management (OCM) best practices for increased OD implementation success

    Effective change management correlates with project success

    A line graph, with Percent of respondents that met or exceeded project objectives listed on the Y-axis, and Poor, Fair, Good, and Excellent listed on the X-axis. The line represents the overall effectiveness of the change management program, and as the value on the Y-axis increases, so does the value on the X-axis.

    Source: Prosci. From Prosci’s 2012 Best Practices in Change Management benchmarking report.

    95% of projects with excellent change management met or EXCEEDED OBJECTIVES, vs. 15% of those with poor OCM. (Prosci)

    143% ROI on projects with excellent OCM. In other words, for every dollar spent on the project, the company GAINS 43 CENTS. This is in contrast to 35% ROI on projects with poor OCM. (McKinsey)

    Info-Tech’s approach to OD implementation is a practical and tactical adaptation of several successful OCM models

    BUSINESS STRATEGY-ORIENTED OCM MODELS. John Kotter’s 8-Step model, for instance, provides a strong framework for transformational change but doesn’t specifically take into account the unique needs of an IT transformation.

    GENERAL-PURPOSE OCM FRAMEWORKS such as ACMP’s Standard for Change Management, CMI’s CMBoK, and Prosci’s ADKAR model are very comprehensive and need to be configured to organizational design implementation-specific initiatives.

    COBIT MANAGEMENT PRACTICE BAI05: MANAGE ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE ENABLEMENT follows a structured process for implementing enterprise change quickly. This framework can be adapted to OD implementation; however, it is most effective when augmented with the people and management training elements present in other frameworks.

    References and Further Reading

    Tailoring a comprehensive, general-purpose OCM framework to an OD implementation requires familiarity and experience. Info-Tech’s OD implementation model adapts the best practices from a wide range of proven OCM models and distills it into a step-by-step process that can be applied to an organizational design transformation.

    The following OD implementation symptoms can be avoided through structured planning

    IN PREVIOUS ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGES, I’VE EXPERIENCED…

    “Difficultly motivating my staff to change.”

    “Higher than average voluntary turnover during and following the implementation.”

    “An overall sense of staff frustration or decreased employee engagement.”

    “Decreased staff productivity and an inability to meet SLAs.”

    “Increased overtime caused by being asked to do two jobs at once.”

    “Confusion about the reporting structure during the change.”

    “Difficulty keeping up with the rate of change and change fatigue from staff.”

    “Business partner dissatisfaction about the change and complaints about the lack of effort or care put in by IT employees.”

    “Business partners not wanting to adjust to the change and continuing to follow outdated processes.”

    “Decrease in stakeholder satisfaction with IT.”

    “Increased prevalence of shadow IT during or following the change.”

    “Staff members vocally complaining about the IT organization and leadership team.”

    Follow this blueprint to develop and execute on your OD implementation

    IT leaders often lack the experience and time to effectively execute on organizational changes. Info-Tech’s organizational design implementation program will provide you with the needed tools, templates, and deliverables. Use these insights to drive action plans and initiatives for improvement.

    How we can help

    • Measure the ongoing engagement of your employees using Info-Tech’s MLI diagnostic. The diagnostic comes complete with easily customizable reports to track and act on employee engagement throughout the life of the change.
    • Use Info-Tech’s customizable project management tools to identify all of the critical changes, their impact on stakeholders, and mitigate potential implementation risks.
    • Develop an in-depth action plan and transition plans for individual stakeholders to ensure that productivity remains high and that service levels and project expectations are met.
    • Align communication with real-time staff engagement data to keep stakeholders motivated and focused throughout the change.
    • Use Info-Tech’s detailed facilitation guide to train managers on how to effectively communicate the change, manage difficult stakeholders, and help ensure a smooth transition.

    Leverage Info-Tech’s customizable deliverables to execute your organizational design implementation

    A graphic with 3 sections: 1.BUILD A CHANGE COMMUNICATION STRATEGY; 2.BUILD THE ORGANIZATIONAL TRANSITION PLAN; 3.1 TRAIN MANAGERS TO LEAD THROUGH CHANGE; 3.2 TRANSITION STAFF TO NEW ROLES. An arrow emerges from point one and directs right, over the rest of the steps. Text above the arrow reads: ONGOING ENGAGEMENT MONITORING AND COMMUNICATION. Dotted arrows emerge from points two and three directing back toward point one. Text below the arrow reads: COMMUNICATION STRATEGY ITERATION.

    CUSTOMIZABLE PROJECT DELIVERABLES

    1. BUILD A CHANGE COMMUNICATION STRATEGY

    • McLean Leadership Index: Real-Time Employee Engagement Dashboard
    • Organizational Design
    • Implementation Kick-Off Presentation
    • Organizational Design Implementation FAQ

    2. BUILD THE ORGANIZATIONAL TRANSITION PLAN

    • Organizational Design Implementation Project Planning Tool

    3.1 TRAIN MANAGERS TO LEAD THROUGH CHANGE

    3.2 TRANSITION STAFF TO NEW ROLES

    • Organizational Design Implementation Manager Training Guide
    • Organizational Design Implementation Transition Plan Template

    Leverage Info-Tech’s tools and templates to overcome key engagement program implementation challenges

    KEY SECTION INSIGHTS:

    BUILD A CHANGE COMMUNICATION STRATEGY

    Effective organizational design implementations mitigate the risk of turnover and lost productivity through ongoing monitoring and managing of employee engagement levels. Take a data-driven approach to managing engagement with Info-Tech’s real-time MLI engagement dashboard and adjust your communication and implementation strategy before engagement risks become issues.

    BUILD THE ORGANIZATIONAL TRANSITION PLAN

    Your organizational design implementation is made up of a series of projects and needs to be integrated into your larger project schedule. Too often, organizations attempt to fit the organizational design implementation into their existing schedules which results in poor resource planning, long delays in implementation, and overall poor results.

    LEAD STAFF THROUGH THE REORGANIZATION

    The majority of IT managers were promoted because they excelled at the technical aspect of their job rather than in people management. Not providing training is setting your organization up for failure. Train managers to effectively lead through change to see a 72% decrease in change management issues. (Abilla, 2009)

    METRICS:

    1. Voluntary turnover: Conduct an exit interview with all staff members during and after transition. Identify any staff members who cite the change as a reason for departure. For those who do leave, multiply their salary by 1.5% (the cost of a new hire) and track this over time.
    2. Business satisfaction trends: Conduct CIO Business Vision one year prior to the change vs. one year after change kick-off. Prior to the reorganization, set metrics for each category for six months after the reorganization, and one year following.
    3. Saved development costs: Number of hours to develop internal methodology, tools, templates, and process multiplied by the salary of the individual.

    Use this blueprint to save 1–3 months in implementing your new organizational structure

    Time and Effort Using Blueprint Without Blueprint
    Assess Current and Ongoing Engagement 1 person ½ day – 4 weeks 1–2 hours for diagnostic set up (allow extra 4 weeks to launch and review initial results). High Value 4–8 weeks
    Set Up the Departmental Change Workbooks 1–5 people 1 day 4–5 hours (varies based on the scope of the change). Medium Value 1–2 weeks
    Design Transition Strategy 1–2 people 1 day 2–10 hours of implementation team’s time. Medium Value 0–2 weeks
    Train Managers to Lead Through Change 1–5 people 1–2 weeks 1–2 hours to prepare training (allow for 3–4 hours per management team to execute). High Value 3–5 weeks

    These estimates are based on reviews with Info-Tech clients and our experience creating the blueprint.

    Totals:

    Workshop: 1 week

    GI/DIY: 2-6 weeks

    Time and Effort Saved: 8-17 weeks

    CIO uses holistic organizational change management strategies to overcome previous reorganization failures

    CASE STUDY

    Industry: Manufacturing

    Source: Client interview

    Problem

    When the CIO of a large manufacturing company decided to undertake a major reorganization project, he was confronted with the stigma of a previous CIO’s attempt. Senior management at the company were wary of the reorganization since the previous attempt had failed and cost a lot of money. There was major turnover since staff were not happy with their new roles costing $250,000 for new hires. The IT department saw a decline in their satisfaction scores and a 10% increase in help desk tickets. The reorganization also cost the department $400,000 in project rework.

    Solution

    The new CIO used organizational change management strategies in order to thoroughly plan the implementation of the new organizational structure. The changes were communicated to staff in order to improve adoption, every element of the change was mapped out, and the managers were trained to lead their staff through the change.

    Results

    The reorganization was successful and eagerly adopted by the staff. There was no turnover after the new organizational structure was implemented and the engagement levels of the staff remained the same.

    $250,000 - Cost of new hires and salary changes

    10% - Increase in help desk tickets

    $400,000 - Cost of project delays due to the poorly effective implementation of changes

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    “Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful.”

    Guided Implementation

    “Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track.”

    Workshop

    “We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place.”

    Consulting

    “Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project.”

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

    Implement a New Organizational Structure

    3. Lead Staff Through the Reorganization
    1. Build a Change Communication Strategy 2. Build the Organizational Transition Plan 3.1 Train Managers to Lead Through Change 3.2 Transition Staff to New Roles
    Best-Practice Toolkit

    1.1 Launch the McLean Leadership Index to set a baseline.

    1.2 Establish your implementation team.

    1.3 Build your change communication strategy and change vision.

    2.1 Build a holistic list of change projects.

    2.2 Monitor and track the progress of your change projects.

    3.1.1 Conduct a workshop with managers to prepare them to lead through the change.

    3.1.2 Build stakeholder engagement plans and conduct conflict style self-assessments.

    3.2.1 Build transition plans for each of your staff members.

    3.2.2 Transition your staff to their new roles.

    Guided Implementations
    • Set up your MLI Survey.
    • Determine the members and roles of your implementation team.
    • Review the components of a change communication strategy.
    • Review the change dimensions and how they are used to plan change projects.
    • Review the list of change projects.
    • Review the materials and practice conducting the workshop.
    • Debrief after conducting the workshop.
    • Review the individual transition plan and the process for completing it.
    • Final consultation before transitioning staff to their new roles.
    Onsite Workshop Module 1: Effectively communicate the reorganization to your staff. Module 2: Build the organizational transition plan. Module 3.1: Train your managers to lead through change. Module 3.2: Complete your transition plans

    Phase 1 Results:

    • Plans for effectively communicating with your staff.

    Phase 2 Results:

    • A holistic view of the portfolio of projects required for a successful reorg

    Phase 3.1 Results:

    • A management team that is capable of leading their staff through the reorganization

    Phase 3.2 Results:

    • Completed transition plans for your entire staff.

    Workshop overview

    Contact your account representative or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Workshop Day 1 Workshop Day 2 Workshop Day 3 Workshop Day 4 Workshop Day 5
    Activities

    Build Your Change Project Plan

    1.1 Review the new organizational structure.

    1.2 Determine the scope of your organizational changes.

    1.3 Review your MLI results.

    1.4 Brainstorm a list of projects to enable the change.

    Finalize Change Project Plan

    2.1 Brainstorm the tasks that are contained within the change projects.

    2.2 Determine the resource allocation for the projects.

    2.3 Understand the dependencies of the projects.

    2.4 Create a progress monitoring schedule

    Enlist Your Implementation Team

    3.1 Determine the members that are best suited for the team.

    3.2 Build a RACI to define their roles.

    3.3 Create a change vision.

    3.4 Create your change communication strategy.

    Train Your Managers to Lead Through Change

    4.1 Conduct the manager training workshop with managers.

    4.2 Review the stakeholder engagement plans.

    4.3 Review individual transition plan template with managers

    Build Your Transition Plans

    5.1 Bring managers back in to complete transition plans.

    5.2 Revisit new organizational design as a source for information.

    5.3 Complete aspects of the template that do not require feedback.

    5.4 Discuss strategies for transitioning.

    Deliverables
    1. McLean Leadership Index Dashboard
    2. Organizational Design Implementation Project Planning Tool
    1. Completed Organizational Design Implementation Project Planning Tool
    1. Communication Strategy
    1. Stakeholder Engagement Plans
    2. Conflict Style Self-Assessments
    3. Organizational Design Implementation Transition Plan Template
    1. Organizational Design Implementation Transition Plan Template

    Phase 1

    Build a Change Communication Strategy

    Build a change communication strategy

    Outcomes of this Section:

    • Launch the McLean Leadership Index
    • Define your change team
    • Build your reorganization kick-off presentation and FAQ for staff and business stakeholders

    This section involves the following participants:

    • CIO
    • IT leadership team
    • IT staff

    Key Section Insight:

    Effective organizational design implementations mitigate the risk of turnover and lost productivity through ongoing monitoring of employee engagement levels. Take a data-driven approach to managing engagement with Info-Tech’s real-time MLI engagement dashboard and adjust your communication and implementation strategy in real-time before engagement risks become issues.

    Phase 1 outline

    Call 1-888-670-8889 or email GuidedImplementations@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Complete these steps on your own, or call us to complete a guided implementation. A guided implementation is a series of 2-3 advisory calls that help you execute each phase of a project. They are included in most advisory memberships.

    Guided Implementation 1: Build a Change Communication Strategy

    Proposed Time to Completion (in weeks): 1-6 weeks

    Step 1.1: Launch Your McLean Leadership Index Survey

    Start with an analyst kick off call:

    • Discuss the benefits and uses of the MLI.
    • Go over the required information (demographics, permissions, etc.).
    • Set up a live demo of the survey.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Launch the survey with your staff.
    • Have a results call with a member of the Info-Tech staff.

    With these tools & templates:

    McLean Leadership Index

    Step 1.2: Establish Your Implementation Team

    Review findings with analyst:

    • Review what members of your department should participate.
    • Build a RACI to determine the roles of your team members.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Hold a kick-off meeting with your new implementation team.
    • Build the RACI for your new team members and their roles.

    Step 1.3: Build Your Change Communication Strategy

    Finalize phase deliverable:

    • Customize your reorganization kick-off presentation.
    • Create your change vision. Review the communication strategy.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Hold your kick-off presentation with staff members.
    • Launch the reorganization communications.

    With these tools & templates:

    • Organizational Design Implementation Kick-Off Presentation
    • Organizational Design Implementation FAQ

    Set the stage for the organizational design implementation by effectively introducing and communicating the change to staff

    Persuading people to change requires a “soft,” empathetic approach to keep them motivated and engaged. But don’t mistake “soft” for easy. Managing the people and communication aspects around the change are amongst the toughest work there is, and require a comfort and competency with uncertainty, ambiguity, and conflict.

    Design Engagement Transition
    Communication

    Communication and engagement are the chains linking your design to transition. If the organizational design initiative is going to be successful it is critical that you manage this effectively. The earlier you begin planning the better. The more open and honest you are about the change the easier it will be to maintain engagement levels, business satisfaction, and overall IT productivity.

    Kick-Off Presentation Inputs

    • LAUNCH THE MCLEAN LEADERSHIP INDEX
    • IDENTIFY YOUR CHANGE TEAM
    • DETERMINE CHANGE TEAM RESPONSIBILITIES
    • DEVELOP THE CHANGE VISION
    • DEFINE KEY MESSAGES AND GOALS
    • IDENTIFY MAJOR CHANGES
    • IDENTIFY KEY MILESTONES
    • BUILD AND MAINTAIN A CHANGE FAQ

    Use the MLI engagement dashboard to measure your current state and the impact of the change in real-time

    The McLean Leadership Index diagnostic is a low-effort, high-impact program that provides real-time metrics on staff engagement levels. Use these insights to understand your employees’ engagement levels throughout the organizational design implementation to measure the impact of the change and to manage turnover and productivity levels throughout the implementation.

    WHY CARE ABOUT ENGAGEMENT DURING THE CHANGE? ENGAGED EMPLOYEES REPORT:

    39% Higher intention to stay at the organization.

    29% Higher performance and increased likelihood to work harder and longer hours. (Source: McLean and Company N=1,308 IT Employees)

    Why the McLean Leadership Index?

    Based on the Net Promoter Score (NPS), the McLean Leadership Index is one question asked monthly to assess engagement at various points in time.

    Individuals responding to the MLI question with a 9 or 10 are your Promoters and are most positive and passionate. Those who answer 7 or 8 are Passives while those who answer 0 to 6 are Detractors.

    Track your engagement distribution using our online dashboard to view MLI data at any time and view results based on teams, locations, manager, tenure, age, and gender. Assess the reactions to events and changes in real-time, analyze trends over time, and course-correct.

    Dashboard reports: Know your staff’s overall engagement and top priorities

    McLean Leadership Index

    OVERALL ENGAGEMENT RESULTS

    You get:

    • A clear breakdown of your detractors, passives, and promotors.
    • To view results by team, location, and individual manager.
    • To dig deeper into results by reviewing results by age, gender, and tenure at the organization to effectively identify areas where engagement is weak.

    TIME SERIES TRENDS

    You get:

    • View of changes in engagement levels for each team, location, and manager.
    • Breakdown of trends weekly, monthly, quarterly, and yearly.
    • To encourage leaders to monitor results to analyze root causes for changes and generate improvement initiatives.

    QUALITATIVE COMMENTS

    You get:

    • To view qualitative comments provided by staff on what is impacting their engagement.
    • To reply directly to comments without impacting the anonymity of the individuals making the comments.
    • To leverage trends in the comments to make changes to communication approaches.

    Launch the McLean Leadership Index in under three weeks

    Info-Tech’s dedicated team of program managers will facilitate this diagnostic program remotely, providing you with a convenient, low-effort, high-impact experience.

    We will guide you through the process with your goals in mind to deliver deep insight into your successes and areas to improve.

    What You Need To Do:

    1. Contact Info-Tech to launch the program and test the functionality in a live demo.
    2. Identify demographics and set access permissions.
    3. Complete manager training with assistance from Info-Tech Advisors.
    4. Participate in a results call with an Info-Tech Advisor to review results and develop an action plan.

    Info-Tech’s Program Manager Will:

    1. Collect necessary inputs and generate your custom dashboard.
    2. Launch, maintain, and support the online system in the field.
    3. Send out a survey to 25% of the staff each week.
    4. Provide ongoing support over the phone, and the needed tools and templates to communicate and train staff as well as take action on results.

    Explore your initial results in a one-hour call with an Executive Advisor to fully understand the results and draw insights from the data so you can start your action plan.

    Start Your Diagnostic Now

    We'll help you get set up as soon as you're ready.

    Start Now

    Communication has a direct impact on employee engagement; measure communication quality using your MLI results

    A line graph titled: The impact of manager communication on employee engagement. The X-axis is labeled from Strongly Disagree to Strongly Agree, and the Y-axis is labeled: Percent of Engaged Respondents. There are 3 colour-coded lines: dark blue indicates My manager provides me with high-quality feedback; light blue indicates I clearly understand what is expected of me on the job; and green indicates My manager keeps me well informed about decisions that affect me. The line turns upward as it moves to the right of the graph.

    (McLean & Company, 2015 N=17,921)

    A clear relationship exists between how effective a manager’s communication is perceived to be and an employee’s level of engagement. If engagement drops, circle back with employees to understand the root causes.

    Establish an effective implementation team to drive the organizational change

    The implementation team is responsible for developing and disseminating information around the change, developing the transition strategy, and for the ongoing management of the changes.

    The members of the implementation team should include:

    • CIO
    • Current IT leadership team
    • Project manager
    • Business relationship managers
    • Human resources advisor

    Don’t be naïve – building and executing the implementation plan will require a significant time commitment from team members. Too often, organizations attempt to “fit it in” to their existing schedules resulting in poor planning, long delays, and overall poor results. Schedule this work like you would a project.

    TOP 3 TIPS FOR DEFINING YOUR IMPLEMENTATION TEAM

    1. Select a Project Manager. Info-Tech strongly recommends having one individual accountable for key project management activities. They will be responsible for keeping the project on time and maintaining a holistic view of the implementation.
    2. Communication with Business Partners is Critical. If you have Business Relationship Managers (BRMs), involve them in the communication planning or assign someone to play this role. You need your business partners to be informed and bought in to the implementation to maintain satisfaction.
    3. Enlist Your “Volunteer Army.” (Kotter’s 8 Principles) If you have an open culture, Info-Tech encourages you to have an extended implementation team made up of volunteers interested in supporting the change. Their role will be to support the core group, assist in planning, and communicate progress with peers.

    Determine the roles of your implementation team members

    1.1 30 Minutes

    Input

    • Implementation team members

    Output

    • RACI for key transition elements

    Materials

    • RACI chart and pen

    Participants

    • Core implementation committee
    1. Each member should be actively engaged in all elements of the organizational design implementation. However, it’s important to have one individual who is accountable for key activities and ensures they are done effectively and measured.
    2. Review the chart below and as a group, brainstorm any additional key change components.
    3. For each component listed below, identify who is Accountable, Responsible, Consulted, and Informed for each (suggested responsibility below).
    CIO IT Leaders PM BRM HR
    Communication Plan A R R R C
    Employee Engagement A R R R C

    Departmental Transition Plan

    R A R I R
    Organizational Transition Plan R R A I C
    Manager Training A R R I C

    Individual Transition Plans

    R A R I I
    Technology and Logistical Changes R R A I I
    Hiring A R I I R
    Learning and Development R A R R R
    Union Negotiations R I I I A
    Process Development R R A R I

    Fast-track your communication planning with Info-Tech’s Organizational Design Implementation Kick-Off Presentation

    Organizational Design Implementation Kick-Off Presentation

    Communicate what’s important to your staff in a simple, digestible way. The communication message should reflect what is important to your stakeholders and what they want to know at the time.

    • Why is this change happening?
    • What are the goals of the reorganization?
    • What specifically is changing?
    • How will this impact me?
    • When is this changing?
    • How and where can I get more information?

    It’s important that the tone of the meeting suits the circumstances.

    • If the reorganization is going to involve lay-offs: The meeting should maintain a positive feel, but your key messages should stress the services that will be available to staff, when and how people will be communicated with about the change, and who staff can go to with concerns.
    • If the reorganization is to enable growth: Focus on celebrating where the organization is going, previous successes, and stress that the staff are critical in enabling team success.

    Modify the Organizational Design ImplementationKick-Off Presentation with your key messages and goals

    1.2 1 hour

    Input

    • New organizational structure

    Output

    • Organizational design goal statements

    Materials

    • Whiteboard & marker
    • ODI Kick-off Presentation

    Participants

    • OD implementation team
    1. Within your change implementation team, hold a meeting to identify and document the change goals and key messages.
    2. As a group, discuss what the key drivers were for the organizational redesign by asking yourselves what problem you were trying to solve.
    3. Select 3–5 key problem statements and document them on a whiteboard.
    4. For each problem statement, identify how the new organizational design will allow you to solve those problems.
    5. Document these in your Organizational Design Implementation Kick-Off Presentation.

    Modify the presentation with your unique change vision to serve as the center piece of your communication strategy

    1.3 1 hour

    Input

    • Goal statements

    Output

    • Change vision statement

    Materials

    • Sticky notes
    • Pens
    • Voting dots

    Participants

    • Change team
    1. Hold a meeting with the change implementation team to define your change vision. The change vision should provide a picture of what the organization will look like after the organizational design is implemented. It should represent the aspirational goal, and be something that staff can all rally behind.
    2. Hand out sticky notes and ask each member to write down on one note what they believe is the #1 desired outcome from the organizational change and one thing that they are hoping to avoid (you may wish to use your goal statements to drive this).
    3. As a group, review each of the sticky notes and group similar statements in categories. Provide each individual with 3 voting dots and ask them to select their three favorite statements.
    4. Select your winning statements in teams of 2–3. Review each statement and as a team work to strengthen the language to ensure that the statement provides a call to action, that it is short and to the point, and motivational.
    5. Present the statements back to the group and select the best option through a consensus vote.
    6. Document the change vision in your Organizational Design Implementation Kick-Off Presentation.

    Customize the presentation identifying key changes that will be occurring

    1.4 2 hours

    Input

    • Old and new organizational sketch

    Output

    • Identified key changes that are occurring

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Sticky notes & Pens
    • Camera

    Participants

    • OD implementation team
    1. On a whiteboard, draw a high-level picture of your previous organizational sketch and your new organizational sketch.
    2. Using sticky notes, ask individuals to highlight key high-level challenges that exist in the current model (consider people, process, and technology).
    3. Consider each sticky note, and highlight and document how and where your new sketch will overcome those challenges and the key differences between the old structure and the new.
    4. Take a photo of the two sketches and comments, and document these in your Organizational Design Implementation Kick-Off Presentation.

    Modify the presentation by identifying and documenting key milestones

    1.5 1 hour

    Input

    • OD implementation team calendars

    Output

    • OD implementation team timeline

    Materials

    • OD Implementation Kick-Off Presentation

    Participants

    • OD implementation team
    1. Review the timeline in the Organizational Design Implementation Kick-Off Presentation. As a group, discuss the key milestones identified in the presentation:
      • Kick-off presentation
      • Departmental transition strategy built
      • Organizational transition strategy built
      • Manager training
      • One-on-one meetings with staff to discuss changes to roles
      • Individual transition strategy development begins
    2. Review the timeline, and keeping your other commitments in mind, estimate when each of these tasks will be completed and update the timeline.

    Build an OD implementation FAQ to proactively address key questions and concerns about the change

    Organizational Design Implementation FAQ

    Leverage this template as a starting place for building an organizational design implementation FAQ.

    This template is prepopulated with example questions and answers which are likely to arise.

    Info-Tech encourages you to use the list of questions as a basis for your FAQ and to add additional questions based on the changes occurring at your organization.

    It may also be a good idea to store the FAQ on a company intranet portal so that staff has access at all times and to provide users with a unique email address to forward questions to when they have them.

    Build your unique organizational design implementation FAQ to keep staff informed throughout the change

    1.6 1 hour + ongoing

    Input

    • OD implementation team calendars

    Output

    • OD implementation team timeline

    Materials

    • OD Implementation Kick-Off Presentation

    Participants

    • OD implementation team
    1. Download a copy of the Organizational Design Implementation FAQ and as a group, review each of the key questions.
    2. Delete any questions that are not relevant and add any additional questions you either believe you will receive or which you have already been asked.
    3. Divide the questions among team members and have each member provide a response to these questions.
    4. The CIO and the project manager should review the responses for accuracy and ensure they are ready to be shared with staff.
    5. Publish the responses on an IT intranet site and make the location known to your IT staff.

    Dispelling rumors by using a large implementation team

    CASE STUDY

    Industry: Manufacturing

    Source: CIO

    Challenge

    When rumors of the impending reorganization reached staff, there was a lot of confusion and some of the more vocal detractors in the department enforced these rumors.

    Staff were worried about changes to their jobs, demotions, and worst of all, losing their jobs. There was no communication from senior management to dispel the gossip and the line managers were also in the dark so they weren’t able to offer support.

    Staff did not feel comfortable reaching out to senior management about the rumors and they didn’t know who the change manager was.

    Solution

    The CIO and change manager put together a large implementation team that included many of the managers in the department. This allowed the managers to handle the gossip through informal conversations with their staff.

    The change manager also built a communication strategy to communicate the stages of the reorganization and used FAQs to address the more common questions.

    Results

    The reorganization was adopted very quickly since there was little confusion surrounding the changes with all staff members. Many of the personnel risks were mitigated by the communication strategy because it dispelled rumors and took some of the power away from the vocal detractors in the department.

    An engagement survey was conducted 3 months after the reorganization and the results showed that the engagement of staff had not changed after the reorganization.

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech’s historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    1a: Launch the MLI Dashboard (Pre-Work)

    Prior to the workshop, Info-Tech’s advisors will work with you to launch the MLI diagnostic to understand the overall engagement levels of your organization.

    1b: Review Your MLI Results

    The analysts will facilitate several exercises to help you and your team identify your current engagement levels, and the variance across demographics and over time.

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    1.1: Define Your Change Team Responsibilities

    Review the key responsibilities of the organizational design implementation team and define the RACI for each individual member.

    1.3: Define Your Change Vision and Goals

    Identify the change vision statement which will serve as the center piece for your change communications as well as the key message you want to deliver to your staff about the change. These messages should be clear, emotionally impactful, and inspirational.

    1.4: Identify Key Changes Which Will Impact Staff

    Collectively brainstorm all of the key changes that are happening as a result of the change, and prioritize the list based on the impact they will have on staff. Document the top 10 biggest changes – and the opportunities the change creates or problems it solves.

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    1.5: Define the High-Level Change Timeline

    Identify and document the key milestones within the change as a group, and determine key dates and change owners for each of the key items. Determine the best way to discuss these timelines with staff, and whether there are any which you feel will have higher levels of resistance.

    1.5: Build the FAQ and Prepare for Objection Handling

    As a group, brainstorm the key questions you believe you will receive about the change and develop a common FAQ to provide to staff members. The advisor will assist you in preparing to manage objections to limit resistance.

    Phase 2

    Build The Organizational Transition Plan

    Build the organizational transition plan

    Outcomes of this section:

    • A holistic list of projects that will enable the implementation of the organizational structure.
    • A schedule to monitor the progress of your change projects.

    This section involves the following participants:

    • CIO
    • Reorganization Implementation Team

    Key Section Insight:

    Be careful to understand the impacts of the change on all groups and departments. For best results, you will need representation from all departments to limit conflict and ensure a smooth transition. For large IT organizations, you will need to have a plan for each department/work unit and create a larger integration project.

    Phase 2 outline

    Call 1-888-670-8889 or email GuidedImplementations@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Complete these steps on your own, or call us to complete a guided implementation. A guided implementation is a series of 2-3 advisory calls that help you execute each phase of a project. They are included in most advisory memberships.

    Guided Implementation 2: Build the Organizational Transition Plan

    Proposed Time to Completion (in weeks): 2-4 weeks

    Step 2.1: Review the Change Dimensions and How They Are Used to Plan Change Projects

    Start with an analyst kick off call:

    • Review the purpose of the kick-off meeting.
    • Review the change project dimensions.
    • Review the Organizational Design Implementation Project Planning Tool.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Conduct your kick-off meeting.
    • Brainstorm a list of reorganization projects and their related tasks.

    With these tools & templates:

    • Organizational Design Implementation Project Planning Tool

    Step 2.2: Review the List of Change Projects

    Review findings with analyst:

    • Revisit the list of projects and tasks developed in the brainstorming session.
    • Assess the list and determine resourcing and dependencies for the projects.
    • Review the monitoring process.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Complete the Organizational Design Implementation Project Planning Tool.
    • Map out your project dependencies and resourcing.
    • Develop a schedule for monitoring projects.

    With these tools & templates:

    • Organizational Design Implementation Project Planning Tool

    Use Info-Tech’s Organizational Design Implementation Project Planning Tool to plan and track your reorganization

    • Use Info-Tech’s Organizational Design Implementation Project Planning Tool to document and track all of the changes that are occurring during your reorganization.
    • Automatically build Gantt charts for all of the projects that are being undertaken, track problems in the issue log, and monitor the progress of projects in the reporting tab.
    • Each department/work group will maintain its own version of this tool throughout the reorganization effort and the project manager will maintain a master copy with all of the projects listed.
    • The chart comes pre-populated with example data gathered through the research and interview process to help generate ideas for your own reorganization.
    • Review the instructions at the top of each work sheet for entering and modifying the data within each chart.

    Have a short kick-off meeting to introduce the project planning process to your implementation team

    2.1 30 minutes

    Output

    • Departmental ownership of planning tool

    Materials

    • OD Implementation Project Planning Tool

    Participants

    • Change Project Manager
    • Implementation Team
    • Senior Management (optional)
    1. The purpose of this kick-off meeting is to assign ownership of the project planning process to members of the implementation team and to begin thinking about the portfolio of projects required to successfully complete the reorganization.
    2. Use the email template included on this slide to invite your team members to the meeting.
    3. The topics that need to be covered in the meeting are:
      • Introducing the materials/templates that will be used throughout the process.
      • Assigning ownership of the Organizational Design Implementation Project Planning Tool to members of your team.
        • Ownership will be at the departmental level where each department or working group will manage their own change projects.
      • Prepare your implementation team for the next meeting where they will be brainstorming the list of projects that will need to be completed throughout the reorganization.
    4. Distribute/email the tools and templates to the team so that they may familiarize themselves with the materials before the next meeting.

    Hello [participant],

    We will be holding our kickoff meeting for our reorganization on [date]. We will be discussing the reorganization process at a high level with special attention being payed to the tools and templates that we will be using throughout the process. By the end of the meeting, we will have assigned ownership of the Project Planning Tool to department representatives and we will have scheduled the next meeting where we’ll brainstorm our list of projects for the reorganization.

    Consider Info-Tech’s four organizational change dimensions when identifying change projects

    CHANGE DIMENSIONS

    • TECHNOLOGY AND LOGISTICS
    • COMMUNICATION
    • STAFFING
    • PROCESS

    Technology and Logistics

    • These are all the projects that will impact the technology used and physical logistics of your workspace.
    • These include new devices, access/permissions, new desks, etc.

    Communication

    • All of the required changes after the reorganization to ongoing communications within IT and to the rest of the organization.
    • Also includes communication projects that are occurring during the reorganization.

    Staffing

    • These projects address the changes to your staff’s roles.
    • Includes role changes, job description building, consulting with HR, etc.

    Process

    • Projects that address changes to IT processes that will occur after the reorganization.

    Use these trigger questions to help identify all aspects of your coming changes

    STAFFING

    • Do you need to hire short or long-term staff to fill vacancies?
    • How long does it typically take to hire a new employee?
    • Will there be staff who are new to management positions?
    • Is HR on board with the reorganization?
    • Have they been consulted?
    • Have transition plans been built for all staff members who are transitioning roles/duties?
    • Will gaps in the structure need to be addressed with new hires?

    COMMUNICATION

    • When will the change be communicated to various members of the staff?
    • Will there be disruption to services during the reorganization?
    • Who, outside of IT, needs to know about the reorganization?
    • Do external communications need to be adjusted because of the reorganization? Moving/centralizing service desk, BRMs, etc.?
    • Are there plans/is there a desire to change the way IT communicates with the rest of the organization?
    • Will the reorganization affect the culture of the department? Is the new structure compatible with the current culture?

    Use these trigger questions to help identify all aspects of your coming changes (continued)

    TECHNOLOGY AND LOGISTICS

    • Will employees require new devices in their new roles?
    • Will employees be required to move their workspace?
    • What changes to the workspace are required to facilitate the new organization?
    • Does new furniture have to be purchased to accommodate new spaces/staff?
    • Is the workspace adequate/up to date technologically (telephone network, Wi-Fi coverage, etc.)?
    • Will employees require new permissions/access for their changing roles?
    • Will permissions/access need to be removed?
    • What is your budget for the reorganization?
    • If a large geographical move is occurring, have problems regarding geography, language barriers, and cultural sensitivities been addressed?

    PROCESS

    • What processes need to be developed?
    • What training for processes is required?
    • Is the daily functioning of the IT department predicted to change?
    • Are new processes being implemented during the reorganization?
    • How will the project portfolio be affected by the reorganization?
    • Is new documentation required to accompany new/changing processes?

    Brainstorm the change projects to be carried out during the reorganization for your team/department

    2.2 3 hours

    Input

    • Constructive group discussion

    Output

    • Thorough list of all reorganization projects

    Materials

    • Whiteboard, sticky notes
    • OD Implementation Project Planning Tool

    Participants

    • Implementation Team
    • CIO
    • Senior Management
    1. Before the meeting, distribute the list of trigger questions presented on the two previous slides to prepare your implementation team for the brainstorming session.
    2. Begin the meeting by dividing up your implementation team into the departments/work groups that they represent (and have ownership of the tool over).
    3. Distribute a different color of sticky notes to each team and have them write out each project they can think of for each of the change planning dimensions (Staffing, Communication, Process and Technology/Logistics) using the trigger questions.
    4. After one hour, ask the groups to place the projects that they brainstormed onto the whiteboard divided into the four change dimensions.
    5. Discuss the complete list of projects on the board.
      • Remove projects that are listed more than once since some projects will be universal to some/all departments.
      • Adjust the wording of projects for the sake of clarity.
      • Identify projects that are specific to certain departments.
    6. Document the list of high-level projects on tab 2 “Project Lists” within the OD Implementation Project Planning Tool after the activity is complete.

    Prioritize projects to assist with project planning modeling

    Prioritization is the process of ranking each project based on its importance to implementation success. Hold a meeting for the implementation team and extended team to prioritize the project list. At the conclusion of the meeting, each requirement should be assigned a priority level. The implementation teams will use these priority levels to ensure efforts are targeted towards the proper projects. A simple way to do this for your implementation is to use the MoSCoW Model of Prioritization to effectively order requirements.

    The MoSCoW Model of Prioritization

    MUST HAVE - Projects must be implemented for the organizational design to be considered successful.

    SHOULD HAVE - Projects are high priority that should be included in the implementation if possible.

    COULD HAVE - Projects are desirable but not necessary and could be included if resources are available.

    WON'T HAVE - Projects won’t be in the next release, but will be considered for the future releases.

    The MoSCoW model was introduced by Dai Clegg of Oracle UK in 1994.

    Keep the following criteria in mind as you determine your priorities

    Effective Prioritization Criteria

    Criteria Description
    Regulatory & Legal Compliance These requirements will be considered mandatory.
    Policy or Contract Compliance Unless an internal policy or contract can be altered or an exception can be made, these projects will be considered mandatory.
    Business Value Significance Give a higher priority to high-value projects.
    Business Risk Any project with the potential to jeopardize the entire project should be given a high priority and implemented early.
    Implementation Complexity Give a higher priority to quick wins.
    Alignment with Strategy Give a higher priority to requirements that enable the corporate strategy and IT strategy.
    Urgency Prioritize projects based on time sensitivity.
    Dependencies A project on its own may be low priority, but if it supports a high-priority requirement, then its priority must match it.
    Funding Availability Do we have the funding required to make this change?

    Prioritize the change projects within your team/department to be executed during the reorganization

    2.3 3 hours

    Input

    • Organizational Design Implementation Project Planning Tool

    Output

    • Prioritized list of projects

    Materials

    • Whiteboard, sticky notes
    • OD Implementation Project Planning Tool

    Participants

    • Implementation Team
    • Extended Implementation Team
    1. Divide the group into their department teams. Draw 4 columns on a whiteboard, including the following:
      • Must have
      • Should have
      • Could have
      • Won’t have
    2. As a group, review each project and collaboratively identify which projects fall within each category. You should have a strong balance between each of the categories.
    3. Beginning with the “must have” projects, determine if each has any dependencies. If any of the projects are dependent on another, add the dependency project to the “must have” category. Group and circle the dependent projects.
    4. Continue the same exercise with the “should have” and “could have” options.
    5. Record the results on tab “2. Project List” of the Organizational Design Implementation Project Planning Tool using the drop down option.

    Determine resource availability for completing your change projects

    2.4 2 hours

    Input

    • Constructive group discussion

    Output

    • Thorough list of all reorganization projects

    Materials

    • Whiteboard, sticky notes
    • OD Implementation Project Planning Tool

    Participants

    • Implementation Team
    • CIO
    • Senior Management
    1. Divide the group into their department teams to plan the execution of the high-level list of projects developed in activity 2.2.
    2. Review the list of high-level projects and starting with the “must do” projects, consider each in turn and brainstorm all of the tasks required to complete these projects. Write down each task on a sticky note and place it under the high-level project.
    3. On the same sticky note as the task, estimate how much time would be required to complete each task. Be realistic about time frames since these projects will be on top of all of the regular day-to-day work.
    4. Along with the time frame, document the resources that will be required and who will be responsible for the tasks. If you have a documented Project Portfolio, use this to determine resourcing.
    5. After mapping out the tasks, bring the group back together to present their list of projects, tasks, and required resources.
      • Go through the project task lists to make sure that nothing is missed.
      • Review the timelines to make sure they are feasible.
      • Review the resources to ensure that they are available and realistic based on constraints (time, current workload, etc.).
      • Repeat the process for the Should do and Could do projects.
    1. Document the tasks and resources in tab “3. Task Monitoring” in the OD Implementation Project Planning Tool after the activity is complete.

    Map out the change project dependencies at the departmental level

    2.5 2 hours

    Input

    • Constructive group discussion

    Output

    • Thorough list of all reorganization projects

    Materials

    • Whiteboard, sticky notes
    • OD Implementation Project Planning Tool

    Participants

    • Implementation Team
    • CIO
    • Senior Management
    1. Divide the group into their department teams to map the dependencies of their tasks created in activity 2.3.
    2. Take the project task sticky notes created in the previous activity and lay them out along a timeline from start to finish.
    3. Determine the dependencies of the tasks internal to the department. Map out the types of dependencies.
      • Finish to Start: Preceding task must be completed before the next can start.
      • Start to Start: Preceding task must start before the next task can start.
      • Finish to Finish: Predecessor must finish before successor can finish.
      • Start to Finish: Predecessor must start before successor can finish.
    4. Bring the group back together and review each group’s timeline and dependencies to make sure that nothing has been missed.
    5. As a group, determine whether there are dependencies that span the departmental lists of projects.
    6. Document all of the dependencies within the department and between departmental lists of projects and tasks in the OD Implementation Project Planning Tool.

    Amalgamate all of the departmental change planning tools into a master copy

    2.6 3 hours

    Input

    • Department-specific copies of the OD Implementation Project Planning Tool

    Output

    • Universal list of all of the change projects

    Materials

    • Whiteboard and sticky notes

    Participants

    • Implementation Project Manager
    • Members of the implementation team for support (optional)
    1. Before starting the activity, gather all of the OD Implementation Project Planning Tools completed at the departmental level.
    2. Review each completed tool and write all of the individual projects with their timelines on sticky notes and place them on the whiteboard.
    3. Build timelines using the documented dependencies for each department. Verify that the resources (time, people, physical) are adequate and feasible.
    4. Combine all of the departmental project planning tools into one master tool to be used to monitor the overall status of the reorganization. Separate the projects based on the departments they are specific to.
    5. Finalize the timeline based on resource approval and using the dependencies mapped out in the previous exercise.
    6. Approve the planning tools and store them in a shared drive so they can be accessed by the implementation team members.

    Create a progress monitoring schedule

    2.7 1 hour weekly

    Input

    • OD Implementation Project Planning Tools (departmental & organizational)

    Output

    • Actions to be taken before the next pulse meeting

    Participants

    • Implementation Project Manager
    • Members of the implementation team for support
    • Senior Management
    1. Hold weekly pulse meetings to keep track of project progress.
    2. The agenda of each meeting should include:
      • Resolutions to problems/complications raised at the previous week’s meeting.
      • Updates on each department’s progress.
      • Raising any issues/complications that have appeared that week.
      • A discussion of potential solutions to the issues/complications.
      • Validating the work that will be completed before the next meeting.
      • Raising any general questions or concerns that have been voiced by staff about the reorganization.
    3. Upload notes from the meeting about resolutions and changes to the schedules to the shared drive containing the tools.
    4. Increase the frequency of the meetings towards the end of the project if necessary.

    Building a holistic change plan enables adoption of the new organizational structure

    CASE STUDY

    Industry: Manufacturing

    Source: CIO

    Challenge

    The CIO was worried about the impending reorganization due to problems that they had run into during the last reorganization they had conducted. The change management projects were not planned well and they led to a lot of uncertainty before and after the implementation.

    No one on the staff was ready for the reorganization. Change projects were completed four months after implementation since many of them had not been predicted and cataloged. This caused major disruptions to their user services leading to drops in user satisfaction.

    Solution

    Using their large and diverse implementation team, they spent a great deal of time during the early stages of planning devoted to brainstorming and documenting all of the potential change projects.

    Through regular meetings, the implementation team was able to iteratively adjust the portfolio of change projects to fit changing needs.

    Results

    Despite having to undergo a major reorganization that involved centralizing their service desk in a different state, there were no disruptions to their user services.

    Since all of the change projects were documented and completed, they were able to move their service desk staff over a weekend to a workspace that was already set up. There were no changes to the user satisfaction scores over the period of their reorganization.

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech’s historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    2.2 Brainstorm Your List of Change Projects

    Review your reorganization plans and facilitate a brainstorming session to identify a complete list of all of the projects needed to implement your new organizational design.

    2.5 Map Out the Dependencies and Resources for Your Change Projects

    Examine your complete list of change projects and determine the dependencies between all of your change projects. Align your project portfolio and resource levels to the projects in order to resource them adequately.

    Phase 3

    Lead Staff Through the Reorganization

    Train managers to lead through change

    Outcomes of this Section:

    • Completed the workshop: Lead Staff Through Organizational Change
    • Managers possess stakeholder engagement plans for each employee
    • Managers are prepared to fulfil their roles in implementing the organizational change

    This section involves the following participants:

    • CIO
    • IT leadership team
    • IT staff

    Key Section Insight:

    The majority of IT managers were promoted because they excelled at the technical aspect of their job rather than in people management. Not providing training is setting your organization up for failure. Train managers to effectively lead through change to see a 72% decrease in change management issues. (Source: Abilla, 2009)

    Phase 3 outline

    Call 1-888-670-8889 or email GuidedImplementations@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Complete these steps on your own, or call us to complete a guided implementation. A guided implementation is a series of 2-3 advisory calls that help you execute each phase of a project. They are included in most advisory memberships.

    Guided Implementation 3: Train Managers to Lead Through Change

    Proposed Time to Completion (in weeks): 1-2 weeks

    Step 3.1: Train Your Managers to Lead Through the Change

    Start with an analyst kick off call:

    • Go over the manager training workshop section of this deck.
    • Review the deliverables generated from the workshop (stakeholder engagement plan and conflict style self-assessment).

    Then complete these activities…

    • Conduct the workshop with your managers.

    With these tools & templates:

    • Organizational Design Implementation Manager Training Guide
    • Organizational Design Implementation Stakeholder Engagement Plan Template

    Step 3.2: Debrief After the Workshop

    Review findings with analyst:

    • Discuss the outcomes of the manager training.
    • Mention any feedback.
    • High-level overview of the workshop deliverables.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Encourage participants to review and revise their stakeholder engagement plans.
    • Review the Organizational Design Implementation Transition Plan Template and next steps.

    Get managers involved to address the majority of obstacles to successful change

    Managers all well-positioned to translate how the organizational change will directly impact individuals on their teams.

    Reasons Why Change Fails

    EMPLOYEE RESISTANCE TO CHANGE - 39%

    MANAGEMENT BEHAVIOR NOT SUPPORTIVE OF CHANGE - 33%

    INADEQUATE RESOURCE OR BUDGET - 14%

    OTHER OBSTACLES - 14%

    72% of change management issues can be directly improved by management.

    (Source: shmula)

    Why are managers crucial to organizational change?

    • Managers are extremely well-connected.
      • They have extensive horizontal and vertical networks spanning the organization.
      • Managers understand the informal networks of the organization.
    • Managers are valuable communicators.
      • Managers have established strong relationships with employees.
      • Managers influence the way staff perceive messaging.

    Conduct a workshop with managers to help them lead their teams through change

    Organizational Design Implementation Manager Training Guide

    Give managers the tools and skills to support their employees and carry out difficult conversations.

    Understand the role of management in communicating the change

    Understand reactions to change

    Resolve conflict

    Respond to FAQs

    Monitor and measure employee engagement

    Prepare managers to effectively execute their role in the organizational change by running a 2-hour training workshop.

    Complete the activities on the following slides to:

    • Plan and prepare for the workshop.
    • Execute the group exercises.
    • Help managers develop stakeholder engagement plans for each of their employees.
    • Initiate the McLean Leadership Index™ survey to measure employee engagement.

    Plan and prepare for the workshop

    3.1 Plan and prepare for the workshop.

    Output

    • Workshop participants
    • Completed workshop prep

    Materials

    • Organizational Design Implementation Manager Training Guide

    Instructions

    1. Create a list of all managers that will be responsible for leading their teams through the change.
    2. Select a date for the workshop.
      • The training session will run approximately 2 hours and should be scheduled within a week of when the implementation plan is communicated organization-wide.
    3. Review the material outlined in the presentation and prepare the Organizational Design Implementation Manager Training Guide for the workshop:
      • Copy and print the “Pre-workshop Facilitator Instructions” and “Facilitator Notes” located in the notes section below each slide.
      • Revise frequently asked questions (FAQs) and responses.
      • Delete instruction slides.

    Invite managers to the workshop

    Workshop Invitation Email Template

    Make necessary modifications to the Workshop Invitation Email Template and send invitations to managers.

    Hi ________,

    As you are aware, we are starting to roll out some of the initiatives associated with our organizational change mandate. A key component of our implementation plan is to ensure that managers are well-prepared to lead their teams through the transition.

    To help you proactively address the questions and concerns of your staff, and to ensure that the changes are implemented effectively, we will be conducting a workshop for managers on .

    While the change team is tasked with most of the duties around planning, implementing, and communicating the change organization-wide, you and other managers are responsible for ensuring that your employees understand how the change will impact them specifically. The workshop will prepare you for your role in implementing the organizational changes in the coming weeks, and help you refine the skills and techniques necessary to engage in challenging conversations, resolve conflicts, and reduce uncertainty.

    Please confirm your attendance for the workshop. We look forward to your participation.

    Kind regards,

    Change team

    Prepare managers for the change by helping them build useful deliverables

    ODI Stakeholder Engagement Plan Template & Conflict Style Self-Assessment

    Help managers create useful deliverables that continue to provide value after the workshop is completed.

    Workshop Deliverables

    Organizational Design Implementation Stakeholder Engagement Plan Template

    • Document the areas of change resistance, detachment, uncertainty, and support for each employee.
    • Document strategies to overcome resistance, increase engagement, reduce uncertainty, and leverage their support.
    • Create action items to execute after the workshop.

    Conflict Style Self-Assessment

    • Determine how you approach conflicts.
    • Analyze the strengths and weaknesses of this approach.
    • Identify ways to adopt different conflict styles depending on the situation.

    Book a follow-up meeting with managers and determine which strategies to Start, Stop, or Continue

    3.2 1 hour

    Output

    • Stakeholder engagement templates

    Materials

    • Sticky notes
    • Pen and paper

    Participants

    • Implementation Team
    • Managers
    1. Schedule a follow-up meeting 2–3 weeks after the workshop.
    2. Facilitate an open conversation on approaches and strategies that have been used or could be used to:
      • Overcome resistance
      • Increase engagement
      • Reduce uncertainty
      • Leverage support
    3. During the discussion, document ideas on the whiteboard.
    4. Have participants vote on whether the approaches and strategies should be started, stopped, or continued.
      • Start: actions that the team would like to begin.
      • Stop: actions that the team would like to stop.
      • Continue: actions that work for the team and should proceed.
    5. Encourage participants to review and revise their stakeholder engagement plans.

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech’s historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    3.1 The Change Maze

    Break the ice with an activity that illustrates the discomfort of unexpected change, and the value of timely and instructive communication.

    3.2 Perform a Change Management Retrospective

    Leverage the collective experience of the group. Share challenges and successes from previous organizational changes and apply those lessons to the current transition.

    3.3 Create a Stakeholder Engagement Plan

    Have managers identify areas of resistance, detachment, uncertainty, and support for each employee and share strategies for overcoming resistance and leveraging support to craft an action plan for each of their employees.

    3.4 Conduct a Conflict Style Self-Assessment

    Give participants an opportunity to better understand how they approach conflicts. Administer the Conflict Style Self-Assessment to identify conflict styles and jumpstart a conversation about how to effectively resolve conflicts.

    Transition your staff to their new roles

    Outcomes of this Section:

    • Identified key responsibilities to transition
    • Identified key relationships to be built
    • Built staff individual transition plans and timing

    This section involves the following participants:

    • All IT staff members

    Key Section Insight

    In order to ensure a smooth transition, you need to identify the transition scheduled for each employee. Knowing when they will retire and assume responsibilities and aligning this with the organizational transition will be crucial.

    Phase 3b outline

    Call 1-888-670-8889 or email GuidedImplementations@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Complete these steps on your own, or call us to complete a guided implementation. A guided implementation is a series of 2-3 advisory calls that help you execute each phase of a project. They are included in most advisory memberships.

    Guided Implementation 3b: Transition Staff to New Roles

    Proposed Time to Completion (in weeks): 2-4

    Step 4.1: Build Your Transition Plans

    Start with an analyst kick off call:

    • Review the Organizational Design Implementation Transition Plan Template and its contents.
    • Return to the new org structure and project planning tool for information to fill in the template.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Present the template to your managers.
    • Have them fill in the template with their staff.
    • Approve the completed templates.

    With these tools & templates:

    • Organizational Design Implementation Project Planning Tool
    • Organizational Design Implementation Transition Plan Template

    Step 4.2: Finalize Your Transition Plans

    Review findings with analyst:

    • Discuss strategies for timing the transition of your employees.
    • Determine the readiness of your departments for transitioning.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Build a transition readiness timeline of your departments.
    • Move your employees to their new roles.

    With these tools & templates:

    • Organizational Design Implementation Project Planning Tool
    • Organizational Design Implementation Transition Plan Template

    Use Info-Tech’s transition plan template to map out all of the changes your employees will face during reorganization

    Organizational Design Implementation Transition Plan Template

    • Use Info-Tech’s Organizational Design Implementation Transition Plan Template to document (in consultation with your employees) all of the changes individual staff members need to go through in order to transition into their new roles.
    • It provides a holistic view of all of the changes aligned to the change planning dimensions, including:
      • Current and new job responsibilities
      • Outstanding projects
      • Documenting where the employee may be moving
      • Technology changes
      • Required training
      • New relationships that need to be made
      • Risk mitigation
    • The template is designed to be completed by managers for their direct reports.

    Customize the transition plan template for all affected staff members

    4.1 30 minutes per employee

    Output

    • Completed transition plans

    Materials

    • Individual transition plan templates (for each employee)

    Participants

    • Implementation Team
    • Managers
    1. Implementation team members should hold one-on-one meetings with the managers from the departments they represent to go through the transition plan template.
    2. Some elements of the transition plan can be completed at the initial meeting with knowledge from the implementation team and documentation from the new organizational structure:
      • Employee information (except for the planned transition date)
      • New job responsibilities
      • Logistics and technology changes
      • Relationships (recommendations can be made about beneficial relationships to form if the employee is transitioning to a new role)
    3. After the meeting, managers can continue filling in information based on their own knowledge of their employees:
      • Current job responsibilities
      • Outstanding projects
      • Training (identify gaps in the employee’s knowledge if their role is changing)
      • Risks (potential concerns or problems for the employee during the reorganization)

    Verify and complete the individual transition plans by holding one-on-one meetings with the staff

    4.2 30 minutes per employee

    Output

    • Completed transition plans

    Materials

    • Individual transition plan templates (for each employee)

    Participants

    • Managers
    • Staff (Managers’ Direct Reports)
    1. After the managers complete everything they can in the transition plan templates, they should schedule one-on-one meetings with their staff to review the completed document to ensure the information is correct.
    2. Begin the meeting by verifying the elements that require the most information from the employee:
      • Current job responsibilities
      • Outstanding projects
      • Risks (ask about any problems or concerns they may have about the reorganization)
    3. Discuss the following elements of the transition plan to get feedback:
      • Training (ask if there is any training they feel they may need to be successful at the organization)
      • Relationships (determine if there are any relationships that the employee would like to develop that you may have missed)
    4. Since this may be the first opportunity that the staff member has had to discuss their new role (if they are moving to one), review their new job title and new job responsibilities with them. If employees are prepared for their new role, they may feel more accountable for quickly adopting the reorganization.
    5. Document any questions that they may have so that they can be answered in future communications from the implementation team.
    6. After completing the template, managers will sign off on the document in the approval section.

    Validate plans with organizational change project manager and build the transition timeline

    4.3 3 hours

    Input

    • Individual transition plans
    • Organizational Design Implementation Project Planning Tool

    Output

    • Timeline outlining departmental transition readiness

    Materials

    • Whiteboard

    Participants

    • Implementation Project Manager
    • Implementation Team
    • Managers
    1. After receiving all of the completed individual transition plan templates from managers, members of the implementation team need to approve the contents of the templates (for the departments that they represent).
    2. Review the logistics and technology requirements for transition in each of the templates and align them with the completion dates of the related projects in the Project Planning Tool. These dates will serve as the earliest possible time to transition the employee. Use the latest date from the list to serve as the date that the whole department will be ready to transition.
    3. Hand the approved transition plan templates and the dates at which the departments will be ready for transitioning to the Implementation Project Manager.
    4. The Project Manager needs to verify the contents of the transition plans and approve them.
    5. On a calendar or whiteboard, list the dates that each department will be ready for transitioning.
    6. Review the master copy of the Project Planning Tool. Determine if the outstanding projects limit your ability to transition the departments (when they are ready to transition). Change the ready dates of the departments to align with the completion dates of those projects.
    7. Use these dates to determine the timeline for when you would like to transition your employees to their new roles.

    Overcoming inexperience by training managers to lead through change

    CASE STUDY

    Industry: Manufacturing

    Source: CIO

    Challenge

    The IT department had not undergone a major reorganization in several years. When they last reorganized, they experienced high turnover and decreased business satisfaction with IT.

    Many of the managers were new to their roles and only one of them had been around for the earlier reorganization. They lacked experience in leading their staff through major organizational changes.

    One of the major problems they faced was addressing the concerns, fears, and resistance of their staff properly.

    Solution

    The implementation team ran a workshop for all of the managers in the department to train them on the change and how to communicate the impending changes to their staff. The workshop included information on resistance and conflict resolution.

    The workshop was conducted early on in the planning phases of the reorganization so that any rumors or gossip could be addressed properly and quickly.

    Results

    The reorganization was well accepted by the staff due to the positive reinforcement from their managers. Rumors and gossip about the reorganization were under control and the staff adopted the new organizational structure quickly.

    Engagement levels of the staff were maintained and actually improved by 5% immediately after the reorganization.

    Voluntary turnover was minimal throughout the change as opposed to the previous reorganization where they lost 10% of their staff. There was an estimated cost savings of $250,000–$300,000.

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech’s historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    3.2.1 Build Your Staff Transition Plan

    Review the contends of the staff transition plan, and using the organizational change map as a guide, build the transition schedule for one employee.

    3.2.1 Review the Transition Plan With the Transition Team

    Review and validate the results for your transition team schedule with other team members. As a group, discuss what makes this exercise difficult and any ideas for how to simplify the exercise.

    Works cited

    American Productivity and Quality Center. “Motivation Strategies.” Potentials Magazine. Dec. 2004. Web. November 2014.

    Bersin, Josh. “Time to Scrap Performance Appraisals?” Forbes Magazine. 5 June 2013. Web. 30 Oct 2013.

    Bridges, William. Managing Transitions, 3rd Ed. Philadelphia: Da Capo Press, 2009.

    Buckley, Phil. Change with Confidence – Answers to the 50 Biggest Questions that Keep Change Leaders up at Night. Canada: Jossey-Bass, 2013.

    “Change and project management.” Change First. 2014. Web. December 2009. <http://www.changefirst.com/uploads/documents/Change_and_project_management.pdf>.

    Cheese, Peter, et al. “Creating an Agile Organization.” Accenture. Oct. 2009. Web. Nov. 2013.

    Croxon, Bruce et al. “Dinner Series: Performance Management with Bruce Croxon from CBC's 'Dragon's Den.'” HRPA Toronto Chapter. Sheraton Hotel, Toronto, ON. 12 Nov. 2013. Panel discussion.

    Culbert, Samuel. “10 Reasons to Get Rid of Performance Reviews.” Huffington Post Business. 18 Dec. 2012. Web. 28 Oct. 2013. <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/samuel-culbert/performance-reviews_b_2325104.html>.

    Denning, Steve. “The Case Against Agile: Ten Perennial Management Objections.” Forbes Magazine. 17 Apr. 2012. Web. Nov. 2013.

    Works cited cont.

    “Establish A Change Management Structure.” Human Technology. Web. December 2014.

    Estis, Ryan. “Blowing up the Performance Review: Interview with Adobe’s Donna Morris.” Ryan Estis & Associates. 17 June 2013. Web. Oct. 2013. <http://ryanestis.com/adobe-interview/>.

    Ford, Edward L. “Leveraging Recognition: Noncash incentives to Improve Performance.” Workspan Magazine. Nov 2006. Web. Accessed May 12, 2014.

    Gallup, Inc. “Gallup Study: Engaged Employees Inspire Company Innovation.” Gallup Management Journal. 12 Oct. 2006. Web. 12 Jan 2012.

    Gartside, David, et al. “Trends Reshaping the Future of HR.” Accenture. 2013. Web. 5 Nov. 2013.

    Grenville-Cleave, Bridget. “Change and Negative Emotions.” Positive Psychology News Daily. 2009.

    Heath, Chip, and Dan Heath. Switch: How to Change Things When Change Is Hard. Portland: Broadway Books. 2010.

    HR Commitment AB. Communicating organizational change. 2008.

    Keller, Scott, and Carolyn Aiken. “The Inconvenient Truth about Change Management.” McKinsey & Company, 2009. <http://www.mckinsey.com/en.aspx>.

    Works cited cont.

    Kotter, John. “LeadingChange: Why Transformation Efforts Fail.” Harvard Business Review. March-April 1995. <http://hbr.org>.

    Kubler-Ross, Elisabeth and David Kessler. On Grief and Grieving: Finding the Meaning of Grief Through the Five Stages of Loss. New York: Scribner. 2007.

    Lowlings, Caroline. “The Dangers of Changing without Change Management.” The Project Manager Magazine. December 2012. Web. December 2014. <http://changestory.co.za/the-dangers-of-changing-without-change-management/>.

    “Managing Change.” Innovative Edge, Inc. 2011. Web. January 2015. <http://www.getcoherent.com/managing.html>.

    Muchinsky, Paul M. Psychology Applied to Work. Florence: Thomson Wadsworth, 2006.

    Nelson, Kate and Stacy Aaron. The Change Management Pocket Guide, First Ed., USA: Change Guides LLC, 2005.

    Nguyen Huy, Quy. “In Praise of Middle Managers.” Harvard Business Review. 2001. Web. December 2014. <https://hbr.org/2001/09/in-praise-of-middle-managers/ar/1>

    “Only One-Quarter of Employers Are Sustaining Gains From Change Management Initiatives, Towers Watson Survey Finds.” Towers Watson. August 2013. Web. January 2015. <http://www.towerswatson.com/en/Press/2013/08/Only-One-Quarter-of-Employers-Are-Sustaining-Gains-From-Change-Management>.

    Shmula. “Why Transformation Efforts Fail.” Shmula.com. September 28, 2009. <http://www.shmula.com/why-transformation-efforts-fail/1510/>

    IT Metrics and Dashboards During a Pandemic

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}118|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Performance Measurement
    • Parent Category Link: /performance-measurement

    The ways you measure success as a business are based on the typical business environment, but during a crisis like a pandemic, the business environment is rapidly changing or significantly different.

    • How do you assess the scope of the risk?
    • How do you quickly align your team to manage new risks?
    • How do you remain flexible enough to adapt to a rapidly changing situation?

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    Measure what you have the data for and focus on managing the impacts to your employees, customers, and suppliers. Be willing to make decisions based on imperfect data. Don’t forget to keep an eye on the long-term objectives and remember that how you act now can reflect on your business for years to come.

    Impact and Result

    Use Info-Tech’s approach to:

    • Quickly assess the risk and identify critical items to manage.
    • Communicate what your decisions are based on so teams can either quickly align or challenge conclusions made from the data.
    • Quickly adjust your measures based on new information or changing circumstances.
    • Use the tools you already have and keep it simple.

    IT Metrics and Dashboards During a Pandemic Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out how to develop your temporary crisis dashboard.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Consider your organizational goals

    Identify the short-term goals for your organization and reconsider your long-term objectives.

    • Crisis Temporary Measures Dashboard Tool

    2. Build a temporary data collection and dashboard method

    Determine your tool for data collection and your data requirements and collect initial data.

    3. Implement a cadence for review and action

    Determine the appropriate cadence for reviewing the dashboard and action planning.

    [infographic]

    Project Management

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}48|cart{/j2store}
    • Related Products: {j2store}48|crosssells{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.7/10
    • member rating average dollars saved: $303,499
    • member rating average days saved: 42
    • Parent Category Name: Project Portfolio Management and Projects
    • Parent Category Link: /ppm-and-projects

    The challenge

    • Ill-defined or even lack of upfront project planning will increase the perception that your IT department cannot deliver value because most projects will go over time and budget.
    • The perception is those traditional ways of delivering projects via the PMBOK only increase overhead and do not have value. This is less due to the methodology and more to do with organizations trying to implement best-practices that far exceed their current capabilities.
    • Typical best-practices are too clinical in their approach and place unrealistic burdens on IT departments. They fail to address the daily difficulties faces by staff and are not sized to fit your organization.
    • Take a flexible approach and ensure that your management process is a cultural and capacity fit for your organization. Take what fits from these frameworks and embed them tailored into your company.

    Our advice

    Insight

    • The feather-touch is often the right touch. Ensure that you have a lightweight approach for most of your projects while applying more rigor to the more complex and high-risk developments.
    • Pick the right tools. Your new project management processes need the right tooling to be successful. Pick a tool that is flexible enough o accommodate projects of all sizes without imposing undue governance onto smaller projects.
    • Yes, take what fits within your company from frameworks, but there is no cherry-picking. Ensure your processes stay in context: If you do not inform for effective decision-making, all will be in vain. Develop your methods such that guide the way to big-picture decision taking and support effective portfolio management.

    Impact and results 

    • The right amount of upfront planning is a function of the type of projects you have and your company. The proper levels enable better scope statements, better requirements gathering, and increased business satisfaction.
    • An investment in a formal methodology is critical to projects of all sizes. An effective process results in more successful projects with excellent business value delivery.
    • When you have a repeatable and consistent approach to project planning and execution, you can better communicate between the IT project managers and decision-makers.
    • Better communication improves the visibility of the overall project activity within your company.

    The roadmap

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    Get started.

    Read our executive brief to understand why you should tailor project management practices to the type of projects you do and your company and review our methodology. We show you how we can support you.

    Lay the groundwork for project management success

    Assess your current capabilities to set the right level of governance.

    • Tailor Project Management Processes to Fit Your Projects – Phase 1: Lay the Groundwork for PM Success (ppt)
    • Project Management Triage Tool (xls)
    • COBIT BAI01 (Manage Programs and Projects) Alignment Workbook (xls)
    • Project Level Definition Matrix (xls)
    • Project Level Selection Tool (xls)
    • Project Level Assessment Tool (xls)
    • Project Management SOP Template (doc)

    Small project require a lightweight framework

    Increase small project's throughput.

    • Tailor Project Management Processes to Fit Your Projects – Phase 2: Build a Lightweight PM Process for Small Initiatives (ppt)
    • Level 1 Project Charter Template (doc)
    • Level 1 Project Status Report Template (doc)
    • Level 1 Project Closure Checklist Template (doc)

    Build the standard process medium and large-scale projects

    The standard process contains fully featured initiation and planning.

    • Tailor Project Management Processes to Fit Your Projects – Phase 3: Establish Initiation and Planning Protocols for Medium-to-Large Projects (ppt)
    • Project Stakeholder and Impact Assessment Tool (xls)
    • Level 2 Project Charter Template (doc)
    • Level 3 Project Charter Template (doc)
    • Kick-Off Meeting Agenda Template (doc)
    • Scope Statement Template (doc)
    • Project Staffing Plan(xls)
    • Communications Management Plan Template (doc)
    • Customer/Sponsor Project Status Meeting Template (doc)
    • Level 2 Project Status Report Template (doc)
    • Level 3 Project Status Report Template (doc)
    • Quality Management Workbook (xls)
    • Benefits Management Plan Template (xls)
    • Risk Management Workbook (xls)

    Build a standard process for the execution and closure of medium to large scale projects

    • Tailor Project Management Processes to Fit Your Projects – Phase 4: Develop Execution and Closing Procedures for Medium-to-Large Projects (ppt)
    • Project Team Meeting Agenda Template (doc)
    • Light Project Change Request Form Template (doc)
    • Detailed Project Change Request Form Template (doc)
    • Light Recommendation and Decision Tracking Log Template (xls)
    • Detailed Recommendation and Decision Tracking Log Template (xls)
    • Deliverable Acceptance Form Template (doc)
    • Handover to Operations Template (doc)
    • Post-Mortem Review Template (doc)
    • Final Sign-Off and Acceptance Form Template (doc)

    Implement your project management standard operating procedures (SOP)

    Develop roll-out and training plans, implement your new process and track metrics.

    • Tailor Project Management Processes to Fit Your Projects – Phase 5: Implement Your PM SOP (ppt)
    • Level 2 Project Management Plan Template (doc)
    • Project Management Process Costing Tool (xls)
    • Project Management Process Training Plan Template (doc)
    • Project Management Training Monitoring Tool (xls)
    • Project Management Process Implementation Timeline Tool (MS Project)
    • Project Management Process Implementation Timeline Tool (xls)

     

     

    Looking at Risk in a New Light: The Six Pillars of Vendor Risk Management

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}209|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Vendor Management
    • Parent Category Link: /vendor-management

    • Moreso than at any other time, our world is changing. As a result, organizations – and their vendors – need to be able to adapt their plans to accommodate risk on an unprecedented level.
    • It is increasingly likely that one of an organization's vendors, or their n-party support vendors, will cause an incident. Organizations must protect themselves by creating better mechanisms to hold their n-party vendors accountable and validate that they comply.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Identifying and managing a vendor’s potential risk impact on your organization requires multiple people in the organization across several functions. Those people all need coaching on the potential changes in the market and how these changes may affect your organization.
    • Organizational leadership is often taken unaware by changes, and their plans lack the flexibility to adjust to significant regulatory upheavals.

    Impact and Result

    • Vendor management practices educate organizations on the different potential risks from vendors in your market and suggest creative and alternative ways to avoid and help manage them.
    • Prioritize and classify your vendors with quantifiable, standardized rankings.
    • Prioritize focus on your high-risk vendors.
    • Standardize your processes for identifying and monitoring vendor risks with our Comprehensive Risk Impact Tool to manage potential impacts.

    Looking at Risk in a New Light: The Six Pillars of Vendor Risk Management Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Looking at Risk in a New Light: The Six Pillars of Vendor Risk Management – Use the research to better understand the negative impacts of vendor actions to your organization

    Use this research to identify and quantify the potential risk impacts caused by vendors. Utilize Info-Tech's approach to look at the impact from various perspectives to better prepare for issues that may arise.

    • Looking at Risk in a New Light: The Six Pillars of Vendor Risk Management Storyboard

    2. Comprehensive Risk Impact Tool – Use this tool to help identify and quantify the impacts of negative vendor actions.

    By playing the “what if” game and asking probing questions to draw out – or eliminate – possible negative outcomes, everyone involved adds their insight into parts of the organization to gather a comprehensive picture of potential impacts.

    • Comprehensive Risk Impact Tool
    [infographic]

    Further reading

    Looking at Risk in a New Light: The Six Pillars of Vendor Risk Management

    Approach vendor risk impact assessments from all perspectives.

    Analyst Perspective

    Organizations must comprehensively understand the impacts vendors may cause through different potential actions.

    Frank Sewell

    The risks from the vendor market have become more prevalent as the technologies and organizational strategies shift to a global direction. With this shift in risk comes a necessary perspective change to align with the greater likelihood of an incident occurring from vendors' (or one of their downstream support vendor's) negative actions.

    Organizational leadership must become more aware of the increasing risks that engaging vendors impose. To do so, they need to make informed decisions, which can only be provided by engaging expert resources in their organizations to compile a comprehensive look at potential risk impacts.

    Frank Sewell

    Research Director, Vendor Management
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    More so than at any other time, our world is changing. As a result organizations – and their vendors – need to be able to adapt their plans to accommodate risk on an unprecedented level.

    It is increasingly likely that one of your vendors, or their n-party support vendors, will cause an incident. Organizations must protect themselves by creating better mechanisms to hold their n-party vendors accountable and validate that they comply.

    Common Obstacles

    Identifying and managing a vendor’s potential risk impact on your organization requires multiple people in the organization across several functions. Those people all need coaching on the potential changes in the market and how these changes may affect your organization.

    Organizational leadership is often taken unaware by changes, and their plans lack the flexibility to adjust to significant regulatory upheavals.

    Info-Tech's Approach

    Vendor management practices educate organizations on the different potential risks from vendors in your market and suggest creative and alternative ways to avoid and help manage them.

    Prioritize and classify your vendors with quantifiable, standardized rankings.

    Prioritize focus on your high-risk vendors.

    Standardize your processes for identifying and monitoring vendor risks with our Comprehensive Risk Impact Tool to manage potential impacts.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Organizations must evolve their risk assessments to be more adaptive to respond to changes in the global market. Ongoing monitoring and continual assessment of vendors’ risks is crucial to avoiding negative impacts.

    Info-Tech’s multi-blueprint series on vendor risk assessment

    There are many individual components of vendor risk beyond cybersecurity.`

    6 components of vendor risk beyond cybersecurity.  Financial, Reputational, Operational, Strategic, Security, Regulatory & Compliance.

    This series will focus on the individual components of vendor risk and how vendor management practices can facilitate organizations’ understanding of those risks.

    Out of Scope:
    This series will not tackle risk governance, determining overall risk tolerance and appetite, or quantifying inherent risk.

    The world is constantly changing

    The IT market is constantly reacting to global influences. By anticipating changes, leaders can set expectations and work with their vendors to accommodate them.

    When the unexpected happens, being able to adapt quickly to new priorities ensures continued long-term business success.

    Below are some things no one expected to happen in the last few years:

    62%

    of IT professionals are more concerned about being a victim of ransomware than they were a year ago.

    Info-Tech Tech Trends Survey 2022

    82%

    of Microsoft non-essential employees shifted to working from home in 2020, joining the 18% already remote.

    Info-Tech Tech Trends Survey 2022

    89%

    of organizations invested in web conferencing technology to facilitate collaboration.

    Info-Tech Tech Trends Survey 2022

    Looking at Risk in a New Light:

    the 6 Pillars of Vendor Risk Management

    Vendor Risk

    • Financial

    • Strategic

    • Operational

    • Security

    • Reputational

    • Regulatory

    • Organizations must review their risk appetite and tolerance levels, considering their complete landscape.
    • Changing regulations, acquisitions, and events that affect global supply chains are current realities, not unlikely scenarios.
    • Prepare your vendor risk management for success using due diligence and scenario- based “What If” discussions to bring all the relevant parties to the table and educate your whole organization on risk factors.
    Assessing Financial Risk Impacts

    Strategic risks on a global scale

    Odds are at least one of these is currently affecting your strategic plans

    • Vendor Acquisitions
    • Global Pandemic
    • Global Shortages
    • Gas Prices
    • Poor Vendor Performance
    • Travel Bans
    • War
    • Natural Disasters
    • Supply Chain Disruptions
    • Security Incidents

    Make sure you have the right people at the table to identify and plan to manage impacts.

    Assess internal and external operational risk impacts

    Two sides of the same coin

    Internal

    • Poorly vetted supplemental staff
    • Bad system configurations
    • Lack of relevant skills
    • Poor vendor performance
    • Failure to follow established processes
    • Weak contractual accountability
    • Unsupportable or end-of-life system components

    External

    • Cyberattacks
    • Supply Chain Issues
    • Geo-Political Disruptions
    • Vendor Acquisitions
    • N-Party Non-Compliance
    • Vendor Fraud

    Operational risk is the risk of losses caused by flawed or failed processes, policies, systems, or events that disrupt business operations.

    Identify and manage security risk impacts on your organization

    Due diligence will enable successful outcomes

    • Poor vendor performance
    • Vendor acquisition
    • Supply chain disruptions and shortages
    • N-party risk
    • Third-party risk

    What your vendor associations say about you

    Reputations that affect your brand: Bad customer reviews, breach of data, poor security posture, negative news articles, public lawsuits, poor performance.

    Regulatory compliance

    Consider implementing vendor management initiatives and practices in your organization to help gain compliance with your expanding vendor landscape.

    Your organizational risks may be monitored but are your n-party vendors?

    6 components of vendor risk beyond cybersecurity.  Financial, Reputational, Operational, Strategic, Security, Regulatory & Compliance.

    Review your expectations with your vendors and hold them accountable

    Regulatory entities are looking beyond your organization’s internal compliance these days. Instead, they are more and more diving into your third-party and downstream relationships, particularly as awareness of downstream breaches increases globally.

    • Are you assessing your vendors regularly?
    • Are you validating those assessments?
    • Do your vendors have a map of their downstream support vendors?
    • Do they have the mechanisms to hold those downstream vendors accountable to your standards?

    Identify and manage risks

    Regulatory

    Regulatory agencies are putting more enforcement around ESG practices across the globe. As a result, organizations will need to monitor the changing regulations and validate that their vendors and n-party support vendors are adhering to these regulations or face penalties for non-compliance.

    Security-Data protection

    Data protection remains an issue. Organizations should ensure that the data their vendors obtain remains protected throughout the vendor’s lifecycle, including post-termination. Otherwise, they could be monitoring for a data breach in perpetuity.

    Mergers and acquisitions

    More prominent vendors continuously buy smaller companies to control the market in the IT industry. Organizations should put protections in their contracts to ensure that an IT vendor’s acquisition does not put them in a relationship with someone that could cause them an issue.

    Identify and manage risks

    Poor vendor performance

    Consider the impact of a vendor that fails to perform midway through the implementation. Organizations need to be able to manage the impact of replacing that vendor and cutting their losses rather than continuing to throw good money away after bad performance.

    Supply chain disruptions and global shortages

    Geopolitical disruptions and natural disasters have caused unprecedented interruptions to business. Incorporate forecasting of product and ongoing business continuity planning into your strategic plans to adapt as events unfold.

    Poorly configured systems

    Failing to ensure that your vendor-supported systems are properly configured and that your vendors are meeting your IT change control and configuration standards is more commonplace than expected. Proper oversight and management of your support vendors is crucial to ensure they are meeting expectations in this regard.

    What to look for

    Identify potential risk impacts

    • Is there a record of complaints against the vendor from their employees or customers?
    • Is the vendor financially sound, with the resources to support your needs?
    • Has the vendor been cited for regulatory compliance issues in the past?
    • Does the vendor have a comprehensive list of their n-party vendor partners?
      • Are they willing to accept appropriate contractual protections regarding them?
    • Does the vendor self-audit, or do they use a vetted third-party audit firm to issue a SOC report annually?
    • Does the vendor operate in regions known for instability?
    • Is the vendor willing to make concessions on contractual protections, or are they only offering one-sided agreements with as-is warranties?

    Prepare your vendor risk management for success

    Due diligence will enable successful outcomes.

    1. Obtain top-level buy-in; it is critical to success.
    2. Build enterprise risk management (ERM) through incremental improvement.
    3. Focus initial efforts on the “big wins” to prove the process works.
    4. Use existing resources.
    5. Build on any risk management activities that already exist in the organization.
    6. Socialize ERM throughout the organization to gain additional buy-in.
    7. Normalize the process long term with ongoing updates and continuing education for the organization.
    8. (Adapted from COSO)

    How to assess third-party risk

    1. Review organizational risks

      Understand the organizations risks to prepare for the “What If” game exercise.
    2. Identify and understand potential risks

      Play the “What If” game with the right people at the table.
    3. Create a risk profile packet for leadership

      Pull all the information together in a presentation document.
    4. Validate the risks

      Work with leadership to ensure that the proposed risks are in line with their thoughts.
    5. Plan to manage the risks

      Lower the overall risk potential by putting mitigations in place.
    6. Communicate the plan

      It is important not only to have a plan but also to socialize it in the organization for awareness.
    7. Enact the plan

      Once the plan is finalized and socialized, put it in place with continued monitoring for success.

    Adapted from Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance

    Insight summary

    Risk impacts often come from unexpected places and have significant consequences.

    Knowing who your vendors are using for their support and supply chain could be crucial in eliminating the risk of non-compliance for your organization.

    Having a plan to identify and validate the regulatory compliance of your vendors is a must for any organization to avoid penalties.

    Insight 1

    Organizations’ strategic plans need to be adaptable to avoid vendors’ negative actions causing an expedited shift in priorities.

    For example, Philips’ recall of ventilators impacted its products and the availability of its competitors’ products as demand overwhelmed the market.

    Insight 2

    Organizations often fail to understand how n-party vendors could place them in non-compliance.

    Even if you know your complete third-party vendor landscape, you may not be aware of the downstream vendors in play. Ensure that you get visibility into this space as well, and hold your direct vendors accountable for the actions of their vendors.

    Insight 3

    Organizations need to know where their data lives and ensure it is protected.

    Make sure you know which vendors are accessing/storing your data, where they are keeping it, and that you can get it back and have the vendors destroy it when the relationship is over. Without adequate protections throughout the lifecycle of the vendor, you could be monitoring for breaches in perpetuity.

    Insight summary

    Assessing financial impacts is an ongoing, educative, and collaborative multidisciplinary process that vendor management initiatives are uniquely designed to coordinate and manage for organizations.

    Operational risk impacts often come from unexpected places and have unforeseen impacts. Knowing where your vendors place in critical business processes and those vendors' business continuity plans concerning your organization should be a priority for those managing the vendors.

    Insight 4

    Organizations need to learn how to assess the likelihood of potential risks in the rapidly changing online environments and recognize how their partnerships and subcontractors’ actions can affect their brand.

    For example, do you understand how a simple news article raises your profile for short-term and long-term adverse events?

    Insight 5

    Organizations fail to plan for vendor acquisitions appropriately.

    Vendors routinely get acquired in the IT space. Does your organization have appropriate safeguards from inadvertently entering a negative relationship? Do you have plans for replacing critical vendors purchased in such a manner?

    Insight 6

    Vendors are becoming more and more crucial to organizations’ overall operations, and most organizations have a poor understanding of the potential impacts they represent.

    Is your vendor solvent? Do they have enough staff to accommodate your needs? Has their long-term planning been affected by changes in the market? Are they unique in their space?

    Identifying vendor risk

    Who should be included in the discussion?

    • While it is true that executive-level leadership defines the strategy for an organization, it is vital for those making decisions to make informed decisions.
    • Getting input from operational experts at your organization will enhance your business's long-term potential for success.
    • Involving those who directly manage vendors and understand the market will aid operational experts in determining the forward path for relationships with your current vendors and identifying emerging potential strategic partners.
    • Make sure security, risk, and compliance are all at the table. These departments all look at risk from different angles for the business and give valuable insight collectively.
    • Organizations have a wealth of experience in their marketing departments that can help identify real-world scenarios of negative actions.

    See the blueprint Build an IT Risk Management Program

    Review your risk management plans for new risks on a regular basis.

    Keep in mind Risk =
    Likelihood x Impact

    (R=L*I).

    Impact (I) tends to remain the same, while Likelihood (L) is becoming closer to 100% as threat actors become more prevalent.

    Managing vendor risk impacts

    How could your vendors impact your organization?

    • Review vendors’ downstream connections to understand thoroughly who you are in business with
    • Institute continuous vendor lifecycle management
    • Develop IT risk governance and change control
    • Introduce continual risk assessment to monitor the relevant vendor markets
    • Monitor and schedule contract renewals and new service/module negotiations
    • Perform business alignment meetings to reassess relationships
    • Ensure strategic alignment in contracts
    • Review vendors’ business continuity plans and disaster recovery testing
    • Re-evaluate corporate policies frequently
    • Monitor your company’s and associated vendors’ online presence
    • Be adaptable and allow for innovations that arise from the current needs
      • Capture lessons learned from prior incidents to improve over time, and adjust your plans accordingly

    Organizations must review their risk appetite and tolerance levels, considering their complete landscape.

    Changing regulations, acquisitions, new security issues, and events that affect global supply chains are current realities, not unlikely scenarios.

    Ongoing Improvement

    Incorporating lessons learned.

    • Over time, despite everyone’s best observations and plans, incidents will catch us off guard.
    • When that happens, follow your incident response plans and act accordingly.
    • An essential step is to document what worked and what did not – collectively known as the “lessons learned.”
    • Use the lessons learned document to devise, incorporate, and enact a better risk management process.

    Sometimes disasters occur despite our best plans to manage them.

    When this happens, it is important to document the lessons learned and improve our plans going forward.

    The "what if" game

    1-3 hours

    Vendor management professionals are in an excellent position to help senior leadership identify and pull together resources across the organization to determine potential risks. By playing the "what if" game and asking probing questions to draw out – or eliminate – possible adverse outcomes, everyone involved adds their insight into parts of the organization to gather a comprehensive picture of potential impacts.

    1. Break into smaller groups (if too small, continue as a single group).
    2. Use the Comprehensive Risk Impact Tool to prompt discussion on potential risks. Keep this discussion flowing organically to explore all potentials but manage the overall process to keep the discussion pertinent and on track.
    3. Collect the outputs and ask the subject matter experts (SMEs) for management options for each one in order to present a comprehensive risk strategy. You will use this to educate senior leadership so that they can make an informed decision to accept or reject the solution.

    Download the Comprehensive Risk Impact Tool

    Input

    • List of identified potential risk scenarios scored by impact
    • List of potential mitigations of the scenarios to reduce the risk

    Output

    • Comprehensive risk profile on the specific vendor solution

    Materials

    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • Comprehensive Risk Impact Tool to help drive discussion

    Participants

    • Vendor Management – Coordinator
    • Organizational Leadership
    • Operations Experts (SMEs)
    • Business Process Experts
    • Legal/Compliance/Risk Manager

    High risk example from tool

    High risk example from Tool.  Shows sample questions to ask to identify impacts, their associated score, weight, and comments or notes.

    Note: Even though a few items are “scored” they have not been added to the overall weight, signaling that the company has noted but does not necessarily hold them against the vendor.

    How to mitigate:

    • Contractually insist that the vendor have a third-party security audit performed annually with the stipulation that they will not denigrate below your acceptable standards.
    • At renewal negotiate better contractual terms and protections for your organization.

    Low risk example from tool

    Low risk example from Tool.  Shows sample questions to ask to identify impacts, their associated score, weight, and comments or notes.

    Summary

    Seek to understand all potential risk impacts to better prepare your organization for success.

    • Organizations need to understand and map out their entire vendor landscape.
    • Understand where all your data lives and how you can control it throughout the vendor lifecycle.
    • Organizations need to be realistic about the likelihood of potential risks in the changing global world.
    • Those organizations that consistently follow their established risk-assessment and due-diligence processes are better positioned to avoid penalties.
    • Understand how your vendors prioritize your organization in their business continuity processes.
    • Bring the right people to the table to outline potential risks in the market and your organization.
    • Socialize the third-party vendor risk management process throughout the organization to heighten awareness and enable employees to help protect the organization.
    • Organizations need to learn how to assess the likelihood of potential risks in the changing global markets and recognize how their partnerships and subcontracts affect their brand.
    • Incorporate lessons learned from prior incidents into your risk management process to build better plans for future issues.

    Organizations must evolve their risk assessments to be more meaningful to respond to global changes in the market.

    Organizations should increase the resources dedicated to monitoring the market as regulatory agencies continue to hold them more and more accountable.

    Bibliography

    Olaganathan, Rajee. “Impact of COVID-19 on airline industry and strategic plan for its recovery with special reference to data analytics technology.” Global Journal of Engineering and Technology Advances, vol 7, no 1, 2021, pp. 033-046.

    Tonello, Matteo. “Strategic Risk Management: A Primer for Directors.” Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, 23 Aug. 2012.

    Frigo, Mark L., and Richard J. Anderson. “Embracing Enterprise Risk Management: Practical Approaches for Getting Started.” COSO, 2011.

    Weak Cybersecurity is taking a toll on Small Businesses (tripwire.com)

    SecureLink 2022 White Paper SL_Page_EA+PAM (rocketcdn.me)

    Shared Assessments Member Poll March 2021 "Guide: Evolving Work Environments Impact of Covid-19 on Profile and Management of Third Parties“

    “Cybersecurity only the tip of the iceberg for third-party risk management”. Help Net Security, April 21, 2021. Accessed: 2022-07-29.

    “Third-Party Risk Management (TPRM) Managed Services”. Deloitte, 2022. Accessed: 2022-07-29.

    “The Future of TPRM: Third Party Risk Management Predictions for 2022”. OneTrust, December 20th2021. Accessed 2022-07-29.

    “Third Party Vendor definition”. Law Insider, Accessed 2022-07-29.

    “Third Party Risk”. AWAKE Security, Accessed 2022-07-29.

    Glidden, Donna. "Don't Underestimate the Need to Protect Your Brand in Publicity Clauses", Info-Tech Research Group, June 2022.

    Greenaway, Jordan. "Managing Reputation Risk: A start-to-finish guide", Transmission Private, July 2022. Accessed June 2022.

    Jagiello, Robert D, and Thomas T Hills. “Bad News Has Wings: Dread Risk Mediates Social Amplification in Risk Communication. ”Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis vol. 38,10 (2018): 2193-2207.doi:10.1111/risa.13117

    Kenton, Will. "Brand Recognition", Investopedia, August 2021. Accessed June 2022. Lischer, Brian. "How Much Does it Cost to Rebrand Your Company?", Ignyte, October 2017. Accessed June 2022.

    "Powerful Examples of How to Respond to Negative Reviews", Review Trackers, February 2022. Accessed June 2022.

    "The CEO Reputation Premium: Gaining Advantage in the Engagement Era", Weber Shadwick, March 2015. Accessed on June 2022.

    "Valuation of Trademarks: Everything You Need to Know",UpCounsel, 2022. Accessed June 2022.

    Related Info-Tech Research

    Identify and Manage Financial Risk Impacts on Your Organization

    • Vendor management practices educate organizations on potential financial impacts that vendors may incur and suggest systems to help manage them.
    • Standardize your processes for identifying and monitoring vendor risks to manage financial impacts with our Financial Risk Impact Tool.

    Identify and Manage Reputational Risk Impacts on Your Organization

    • Vendor management practices educate organizations on potential risks to vendors in your market and suggest creative and alternative ways to avoid and help manage them.
    • Standardize your processes for identifying and monitoring vendor risks to manage potential impacts on your reputation and brand with our Reputational Risk Impact Tool.

    Identify and Manage Strategic Risk Impacts on Your Organization

    • Vendor management practices educate organizations on potential risks to vendors in your market and suggest creative and alternative ways to avoid and help manage them.
    • Standardize your processes for identifying and monitoring vendor risks to manage potential impacts on your strategic plan with our Strategic Risk Impact Tool.

    Regulatory guidance and industry standards

    Deliver Digital Products at Scale

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}156|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 10.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $86,499 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 53 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Development
    • Parent Category Link: /development
    • Products are the lifeblood of an organization. They provide the capabilities the business needs to deliver value to both internal and external customers and stakeholders.
    • Product organizations are expected to continually deliver evolving value to the overall organization as they grow.
    • You need to clearly convey the direction and strategy of a broad product portfolio to gain alignment, support, and funding from your organization.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Product delivery requires significant shifts in the way you complete development work and deliver value to your users. Make the changes that improve end-user value and enterprise alignment.
    • Your organizational goals and strategy are achieved through capabilities that deliver value. Your product hierarchy is the mechanism to translate enterprise goals, priorities, and constraints down to the product level where changes can be made.
    • Recognize that each product owner represents one of three primary perspectives: business, technical, and operational. Although all share the same capabilities, how they approach their responsibilities is influenced by their perspective.
    • The quality of your product backlog – and your ability to realize business value from your delivery pipeline – is directly related to the input, content, and prioritization of items in your product roadmap.
    • Your product family roadmap and product roadmap tell different stories. The product family roadmap represents the overall connection of products to the enterprise strategy, while the product roadmap focuses on the fulfillment of the product’s vision.
    • Although products can be delivered with any software development lifecycle, methodology, delivery team structure, or organizational design, high-performing product teams optimize their structure to fit the needs of product and product family delivery.

    Impact and Result

    • Understand the importance of product families for scaling product delivery.
    • Define products in your context and organize products into operational families.
    • Use product family roadmaps to align product roadmaps to enterprise goals and priorities.
    • Evaluate the different approaches to improve your product family delivery pipelines and milestones.

    Deliver Digital Products at Scale Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should define enterprise product families to scale your product delivery capability, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Become a product-centric organization

    Define products in your organization’s context and explore product families as a way to organize products at scale.

    • Deliver Digital Products at Scale – Phase 1: Become a Product-Centric Organization
    • Deliver Digital Products at Scale Workbook
    • Digital Product Family Strategy Playbook

    2. Organize products into product families

    Identify an approach to group the inventory of products into one or more product families.

    • Deliver Digital Products at Scale – Phase 2: Organize Products Into Product Families

    3. Ensure alignment between products and families

    Confirm alignment between your products and product families via the product family roadmap and a shared definition of delivered value.

    • Deliver Digital Products at Scale – Phase 3: Ensure Alignment Between Products and Families

    4. Bridge the gap between product families and delivery

    Agree on a delivery approach that best aligns with your product families.

    • Deliver Digital Products at Scale – Phase 4: Bridge the Gap Between Product Families and Delivery
    • Deliver Digital Products at Scale Readiness Assessment

    5. Build your transformation roadmap and communication plan

    Define your communication plan and transformation roadmap for transitioning to delivering products at the scale of your organization.

    • Deliver Digital Products at Scale – Phase 5: Transformation Roadmap and Communication

    Infographic

    Workshop: Deliver Digital Products at Scale

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Become a Product-Centric Organization

    The Purpose

    Define products in your organization’s context and explore product families as a way to organize products at scale.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    An understanding of the case for product practices

    A concise definition of products and product families

    Activities

    1.1 Understand your organizational factors driving product-centric delivery.

    1.2 Establish your organization’s product inventory.

    1.3 Determine your approach to scale product families.

    Outputs

    Organizational drivers and goals for a product-centric delivery

    Definition of product

    Product scaling principles

    Scaling approach and direction

    Pilot list of products to scale

    2 Organize Products Into Product Families

    The Purpose

    Identify a suitable approach to group the inventory of products into one or more product families.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A scaling approach for products that fits your organization

    Activities

    2.1 Define your product families.

    Outputs

    Product family mapping

    Enabling applications

    Dependent applications

    Product family canvas

    3 Ensure Alignment Between Products and Families

    The Purpose

    Confirm alignment between your products and product families via the product family roadmap and a shared definition of delivered value.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Recognition of the product family roadmap and a shared definition of value as key concepts to maintain alignment between your products and product families

    Activities

    3.1 Leverage product family roadmaps.

    3.2 Use stakeholder management to improve roadmap communication.

    3.3 Configure your product family roadmaps.

    3.4 Confirm product family to product alignment.

    Outputs

    Current approach for communication of product family strategy

    List of product family stakeholders and a prioritization plan for communication

    Defined key pieces of a product family roadmap

    An approach to confirming alignment between products and product families through a shared definition of business value

    4 Bridge the Gap Between Product Families and Delivery

    The Purpose

    Agree on the delivery approach that best aligns with your product families.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    An understanding of the team configuration and operating model required to deliver value through your product families

    Activities

    4.1 Assess your organization’s delivery readiness.

    4.2 Understand your delivery options.

    4.3 Determine your operating model.

    4.4 Identify how to fund product delivery.

    4.5 Learn how to introduce your digital product family strategy.

    4.6 Communicate changes on updates to your strategy.

    4.7 Determine your next steps.

    Outputs

    Assessment results on your organization’s delivery maturity

    A preferred approach to structuring product delivery

    Your preferred operating model for delivering product families

    Understanding of your preferred approach for product family funding

    Product family transformation roadmap

    Your plan for communicating your roadmap

    List of actionable next steps to start on your journey

    5 Advisory: Next Steps and Wrap-Up (offsite)

    The Purpose

    Implement your communication plan and transformation roadmap for transitioning to delivering products at the scale of your organization.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    New product family organization and supporting product delivery approach

    Activities

    5.1 Execute communication plan and product family changes.

    5.2 Review the pilot family implementation and update the transformation roadmap.

    5.3 Begin advisory calls for related blueprints.

    Outputs

    Organizational communication of product families and product family roadmaps

    Product family implementation and updated transformation roadmap

    Support for product owners, backlog and roadmap management, and other topics

    Further reading

    Deliver Digital Products at Scale

    Deliver value at the scale of your organization through defining enterprise product families.

    Analyst Perspective

    Product families align enterprise goals to product changes and value realization.

    A picture of Info-Tech analyst Banu Raghuraman. A picture of Info-Tech analyst Ari Glaizel. A picture of Info-Tech analyst Hans Eckman

    Our world is changing faster than ever, and the need for business agility continues to grow. Organizations are shifting from long-term project delivery to smaller, iterative product delivery models to be able to embrace change and respond to challenges and opportunities faster.

    Unfortunately, many organizations focus on product delivery at the tactical level. Product teams may be individually successful, but how well are their changes aligned to division and enterprise goals and priorities?

    Grouping products into operationally aligned families is key to delivering the right value to the right stakeholders at the right time.

    Product families translate enterprise goals, constraints, and priorities down to the individual product level so product owners can make better decisions and more effectively manage their roadmaps and backlogs. By scaling products into families and using product family roadmaps to align product roadmaps, product owners can deliver the capabilities that allow organizations to reach their goals.

    In this blueprint, we’ll provide the tools and guidance to help you define what “product” means to your organization, use scaling patterns to build product families, align product and product family roadmaps, and identify impacts to your delivery and organizational design models.

    Banu Raghuraman, Ari Glaizel, and Hans Eckman

    Applications Practice

    Info-Tech Research Group

    Deliver Digital Products at Scale

    Deliver value at the scale of your organization through defining enterprise product families.

    EXECUTIVE BRIEF

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    • Products are the lifeblood of an organization. They deliver the capabilities needed to deliver value to customers, internal users, and stakeholders.
    • The shift to becoming a product organization is intended to continually increase the value you provide to the broader organization as you grow and evolve.
    • You need to clearly convey the direction and strategy of your product portfolio to gain alignment, support, and funding from your organization.

    Common Obstacles

    • IT organizations are traditionally organized to deliver initiatives in specific periods of time. This conflicts with product delivery, which continuously delivers value over the lifetime of a product.
    • Delivering multiple products together creates additional challenges because each product has its own pedigree, history, and goals.
    • Product owners struggle to prioritize changes to deliver product value. This creates a gap and conflict between product and enterprise goals.

    Info-Tech’s Approach

    Info-Tech’s approach will guide you through:

    • Understanding the importance of product families in scaling product delivery.
    • Defining products in your context and organizing products into operational families.
    • Using product family roadmaps to align product roadmaps to enterprise goals and priorities.
    • Evaluating the different approaches to improve your product family delivery pipelines and milestones.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Changes can only be made at the individual product or service level. To achieve enterprise goals and priorities, organizations needed to organize and scale products into operational families. This structure allows product managers to translate goals and constraints to the product level and allows product owners to deliver changes that support enabling capabilities. In this blueprint, we’ll help you define your products, scale them using the best patterns, and align your roadmaps and delivery models to improve throughput and value delivery.

    Info-Tech’s approach

    Operationally align product delivery to enterprise goals

    A flowchart is shown on how to operationally align product delivery to enterprise goals.

    The Info-Tech difference:

    1. Start by piloting product families to determine which approaches work best for your organization.
    2. Create a common definition of what a product is and identify products in your inventory.
    3. Use scaling patterns to build operationally aligned product families.
    4. Develop a roadmap strategy to align families and products to enterprise goals and priorities.
    5. Use products and families to evaluate delivery and organizational design improvements.

    Deliver Digital Products at Scale via Enterprise Product Families

    An infographic on the Enterprise Product Families is shown.

    Product does not mean the same thing to everyone

    Do not expect a universal definition of products.

    Every organization and industry has a different definition of what a product is. Organizations structure their people, processes, and technologies according to their definition of the products they manage. Conflicting product definitions between teams increase confusion and misalignment of product roadmaps.

    “A product [is] something (physical or not) that is created through a process and that provides benefits to a market.”

    - Mike Cohn, Founding Member of Agile Alliance and Scrum Alliance

    “A product is something ... that is created and then made available to customers, usually with a distinct name or order number.”

    - TechTarget

    “A product is the physical object ... , software or service from which customer gets direct utility plus a number of other factors, services, and perceptions that make the product useful, desirable [and] convenient.”

    - Mark Curphey

    Organizations need a common understanding of what a product is and how it pertains to the business. This understanding needs to be accepted across the organization.

    “There is not a lot of guidance in the industry on how to define [products]. This is dangerous because what will happen is that product backlogs will be formed in too many areas. All that does is create dependencies and coordination across teams … and backlogs.”

    – Chad Beier, "How Do You Define a Product?” Scrum.org

    What is a product?

    “A tangible solution, tool, or service (physical or digital) that enables the long-term and evolving delivery of value to customers and stakeholders based on business and user requirements.”

    Info-Tech Insight

    A proper definition of product recognizes three key facts:

    1. Products are long-term endeavors that don’t end after the project finishes.
    2. Products are not just “apps” but can be software or services that drive the delivery of value.
    3. There is more than one stakeholder group that derives value from the product or service.

    Products and services share the same foundation and best practices

    For the purpose of this blueprint, product/service and product owner/service owner are used interchangeably. Product is used for consistency but would apply to services as well.

    Product = Service

    “Product” and “service” are terms that each organization needs to define to fit its culture and customers (internal and external). The most important aspect is consistent use and understanding of:

    • External products
    • Internal products
    • External services
    • Internal services
    • Products as a service (PaaS)
    • Productizing services (SaaS)

    Recognize the different product owner perspectives

    Business:

    • Customer facing, revenue generating

    Technical:

    • IT systems and tools

    Operations:

    • Keep the lights on processes

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Product owners must translate needs and constraints from their perspective into the language of their audience. Kathy Borneman, Digital Product Owner at SunTrust Bank, noted the challenges of finding a common language between lines of business and IT (e.g. what is a unit?).

    Info-Tech Insight

    Recognize that product owners represent one of three primary perspectives. Although all share the same capabilities, how they approach their responsibilities is influenced by their perspective.

    “A Product Owner in its most beneficial form acts like an Entrepreneur, like a 'mini-CEO'. The Product Owner is someone who really 'owns' the product.”

    – Robbin Schuurman, “Tips for Starting Product Owners”

    Identify the differences between a project-centric and a product-centric organization

    Project

    Product

    Fund projects

    Funding

    Fund products or teams

    Line of business sponsor

    Prioritization

    Product owner

    Makes specific changes to a product

    Product management

    Improve product maturity and support

    Assign people to work

    Work allocation

    Assign work to product teams

    Project manager manages

    Capacity management

    Team manages capacity

    Info-Tech Insight

    Product delivery requires significant shifts in the way you complete development work and deliver value to your users. Make the changes that support improving end-user value and enterprise alignment.

    Projects can be a mechanism for delivering product changes and improvements

    A flowchart is shown to demonstrate the difference between project lifecycle, hybrid lifecycle and product lifecycle.

    Projects within products

    Regardless of whether you recognize yourself as a product-based or project-based shop, the same basic principles should apply. The purpose of projects is to deliver the scope of a product release. The shift to product delivery leverages a product roadmap and backlog as the mechanism for defining and managing the scope of the release. Eventually, teams progress to continuous integration/continuous delivery (CI/CD) where they can release on demand or as scheduled, requiring org change management.

    Define product value by aligning backlog delivery with roadmap goals

    In each product plan, the backlogs show what you will deliver. Roadmaps identify when and in what order you will deliver value, capabilities, and goals.

    An image is shown to demonstrate the relationship between the product backlog and the product roadmap.

    Product roadmaps guide delivery and communicate your strategy

    In Deliver on Your Digital Product Vision, we demonstrate how the product roadmap is core to value realization. The product roadmap is your communicated path, and as a product owner, you use it to align teams and changes to your defined goals while aligning your product to enterprise goals and strategy.

    An example of a product roadmap is shown to demonstrate how it is the core to value realization.

    Adapted from: Pichler, "What Is Product Management?""

    Info-Tech Insight

    The quality of your product backlog – and your ability to realize business value from your delivery pipeline – is directly related to the input, content, and prioritization of items in your product roadmap.

    Use Agile DevOps principles to expedite product-centric delivery and management

    Delivering products does not necessarily require an Agile DevOps mindset. However, Agile methods facilitate the journey because product thinking is baked into them.

    A flowchart is shown to demonstrate the product deliery maturity and the Agile DevOps used.
    Based on: Ambysoft, 2018

    Organizations start with Waterfall to improve the predictable delivery of product features.

    Iterative development shifts the focus from delivery of features to delivery of user value.

    Agile further shifts delivery to consider ROI. Often, the highest-value backlog items aren’t the ones with the highest ROI.

    Lean and DevOps improve your delivery pipeline by providing full integration between product owners, development teams, and operations.

    CI/CD reduces time in process by allowing release on demand and simplifying release and support activities.

    Although teams will adopt parts of all these stages during their journey, it isn’t until you’ve adopted a fully integrated delivery chain that you’ve become product centric.

    Scale products into related families to improve value delivery and alignment

    Defining product families builds a network of related products into coordinated value delivery streams.

    A flowchart is shown to demonstrate the relations between product family and the delivery streams.

    “As with basic product management, scaling an organization is all about articulating the vision and communicating it effectively. Using a well-defined framework helps you align the growth of your organization with that of the company. In fact, how the product organization is structured is very helpful in driving the vision of what you as a product company are going to do.”

    – Rich Mironov, Mironov Consulting

    Product families translate enterprise goals into value-enabling capabilities

    A flowchart is shown to demonstrate the relationship between enterprise strategy and enabling capabilities.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Your organizational goals and strategy are achieved through capabilities that deliver value. Your product hierarchy is the mechanism to translate enterprise goals, priorities, and constraints down to the product level where changes can be made.

    Arrange product families by operational groups, not solely by your org chart

    A flowchart is shown to demonstrate how to arrange product families by operational groups.

    1. To align product changes with enterprise goals and priorities, you need to organize your products into operational groups based on the capabilities or business functions the product and family support.

    2. Product managers translate these goals, priorities, and constraints into their product families, so they are actionable at the next level, whether that level is another product family or products implementing enhancements to meet these goals.

    3. The product family manager ensures that the product changes enhance the capabilities that allow you to realize your product family, division, and enterprise goals.

    4. Enabling capabilities realize value and help reach your goals, which then drives your next set of enterprise goals and strategy.

    Approach alignment from both directions, validating by the opposite way

    Defining your product families is not a one-way street. Often, we start from either the top or the bottom depending on our scaling principles. We use multiple patterns to find the best arrangement and grouping of our products and families.

    It may be helpful to work partway, then approach your scaling from the opposite direction, meeting in the middle. This way you are taking advantage of the strengths in both approaches.

    Once you have your proposed structure, validate the grouping by applying the principles from the opposite direction to ensure each product and family is in the best starting group.

    As the needs of your organization change, you may need to realign your product families into your new business architecture and operational structure.

    A top-down alignment example is shown.

    When to use: You have a business architecture defined or clear market/functional grouping of value streams.

    A bottom-up alignment example is shown.

    When to use: You are starting from an Application Portfolio Management application inventory to build or validate application families.

    Leverage patterns for scaling products

    Organizing your products and families is easier when leveraging these grouping patterns. Each is explained in greater detail on the following slides

    Value Stream Alignment

    Enterprise Applications

    Shared Services

    Technical

    Organizational Alignment

    • Business architecture
      • Value stream
      • Capability
      • Function
    • Market/customer segment
    • Line of business (LoB)
    • Example: Customer group > value stream > products
    • Enabling capabilities
    • Enterprise platforms
    • Supporting apps
    • Example: HR > Workday/Peoplesoft > ModulesSupporting: Job board, healthcare administrator
    • Organization of related services into service family
    • Direct hierarchy does not necessarily exist within the family
    • Examples: End-user support and ticketing, workflow and collaboration tools
    • Domain grouping of IT infrastructure, platforms, apps, skills, or languages
    • Often used in combination with Shared Services grouping or LoB-specific apps
    • Examples: Java, .NET, low-code, database, network
    • Used at higher levels of the organization where products are aligned under divisions
    • Separation of product managers from organizational structure no longer needed because the management team owns product management role

    Leverage the product family roadmap for alignment

    It’s more than a set of colorful boxes. It’s the map to align everyone to where you are going.

    Your product family roadmap

      ✓ Lays out a strategy for your product family.

      ✓ Is a statement of intent for your family of products.

      ✓ Communicates direction for the entire product family and product teams.

      ✓ Directly connects to the organization’s goals.

    However, it is not:

      x Representative of a hard commitment.

      x A simple combination of your current product roadmaps.

    Before connecting your family roadmap to products, think about what each roadmap typically presents

    An example of a product family roadmap is shown and how it can be connected to the products.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Your product family roadmap and product roadmap tell different stories. The product family roadmap represents the overall connection of products to the enterprise strategy, while the product roadmap focuses on the fulfillment of the product’s vision.

    Product family roadmaps are more strategic by nature

    While individual product roadmaps can be different levels of tactical or strategic depending on a variety of market factors, your options are more limited when defining roadmaps for product families.

    Product

    TACTICAL

    A roadmap that is technical, committed, and detailed.

    Product Family

    STRATEGIC

    A roadmap that is strategic, goal based, high level, and flexible.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Roadmaps for your product family are, by design, less detailed. This does not mean they aren’t actionable! Your product family roadmap should be able to communicate clear intentions around the future delivery of value in both the near and long term.

    Consider volatility when structuring product family roadmaps

    A roadmap is shown without any changes.

    There is no such thing as a roadmap that never changes.

    Your product family roadmap represents a broad statement of intent and high-level tactics to get closer to the organization’s goals.

    A roadmap is shown with changes.

    All good product family roadmaps embrace change!

    Your strategic intentions are subject to volatility, especially those planned further in the future. The more costs you incur in planning, the more you leave yourself exposed to inefficiency and waste if those plans change.

    Info-Tech Insight

    A good product family roadmap is intended to manage and communicate the inevitable changes as a result of market volatility and changes in strategy.

    Product delivery realizes value for your product family

    While planning and analysis are done at the family level, work and delivery are done at the individual product level.

    PRODUCT STRATEGY

    What are the artifacts?

    What are you saying?

    Defined at the family level?

    Defined at the product level?

    Vision

    I want to...

    Strategic focus

    Delivery focus

    Goals

    To get there we need to...

    Roadmap

    To achieve our goals, we’ll deliver...

    Backlog

    The work will be done in this order...

    Release Plan

    We will deliver in the following ways...

    Typical elements of a product family roadmap

    While there are others, these represent what will commonly appear across most family-based roadmaps.

    An example is shown to highlight the typical elements of a product family roadmap.

    GROUP/CATEGORY: Groups are collections of artifacts. In a product family context, these are usually product family goals, value streams, or products.

    ARTIFACT: An artifact is one of many kinds of tangible by-products produced during the delivery of products. For a product family, the artifacts represented are capabilities or value streams.

    MILESTONE: Points in the timeline when established sets of artifacts are complete. This is a critical tool in the alignment of products in a given family.

    TIME HORIZON: Separated periods within the projected timeline covered by the roadmap.

    Connecting your product family roadmaps to product roadmaps

    Your product and product family roadmaps should be connected at an artifact level that is common between both. Typically, this is done with capabilities, but it can be done at a more granular level if an understanding of capabilities isn’t available.

    An example is shown on how the product family roadmpas can be connected to the product roadmaps.

    Multiple roadmap views can communicate differently, yet tell the same truth

    Audience

    Business/ IT Leaders

    Users/Customers

    Delivery Teams

    Roadmap View

    Portfolio

    Product Family

    Technology

    Objectives

    To provide a snapshot of the portfolio and priority products

    To visualize and validate product strategy

    To coordinate broad technology and architecture decisions

    Artifacts

    Line items or sections of the roadmap are made up of individual products, and an artifact represents a disposition at its highest level.

    Artifacts are generally grouped by product teams and consist of strategic goals and the features that realize those goals.

    Artifacts are grouped by the teams who deliver that work and consist of technical capabilities that support the broader delivery of value for the product family.

    Your communication objectives are linked to your audience; ensure you know your audience and speak their language

    I want to...

    I need to talk to...

    Because they are focused on...

    ALIGN PRODUCT TEAMS

    Get my delivery teams on the same page.

    Architects

    Products Owners

    PRODUCTS

    A product that delivers value against a common set of goals and objectives.

    SHOWCASE CHANGES

    Inform users and customers of product strategy.

    Bus. Process Owners

    End Users

    FUNCTIONALITY

    A group of functionality that business customers see as a single unit.

    ARTICULATE RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS

    Inform the business of product development requirements.

    IT Management

    Business Stakeholders

    FUNDING

    An initiative that those with the money see as a single budget.

    Assess the impacts of product-centric delivery on your teams and org design

    Product delivery can exist within any org structure or delivery model. However, when making the shift toward product management, consider optimizing your org design and product team structure to match your capacity and throughput needs.

    A flowchart is shown to see how the impacts of product-centric delivery can impact team and org designs.

    Determine which delivery team structure best fits your product pipeline

    Four delivery team structures are shown. The four are: functional roles, shared service and resource pools, product or system, and skills and competencies.

    Weigh the pros and cons of IT operating models to find the best fit

    There are many different operating models. LoB/Product Aligned and Hybrid Functional align themselves most closely with how products and product families are typically delivered.

    1. LoB/Product Aligned – Decentralized Model: Line of Business, Geographically, Product, or Functionally Aligned
    2. A decentralized IT operating model that embeds specific functions within LoBs/product teams and provides cross-organizational support for their initiatives.

    3. Hybrid Functional: Functional/Product Aligned
    4. A best-of-both-worlds model that balances the benefits of centralized and decentralized approaches to achieve both customer responsiveness and economies of scale.

    5. Hybrid Service Model: Product-Aligned Operating Model
    6. A model that supports what is commonly referred to as a matrix organization, organizing by highly related service categories and introducing the role of the service owner.

    7. Centralized: Plan-Build-Run
    8. A highly typical IT operating model that focuses on centralized strategic control and oversight in delivering cost-optimized and effective solutions.

    9. Centralized: Demand-Develop-Service
    10. A centralized IT operating model that lends well to more mature operating environments. Aimed at leveraging economies of scale in an end-to-end services delivery model.

    Consider how investment spending will differ in a product environment

    Reward for delivering outcomes, not features

    Autonomy

    Flexibility

    Accountability

    Fund what delivers value

    Allocate iteratively

    Measure and adjust

    Fund long-lived delivery of value through products (not projects).

    Give autonomy to the team to decide exactly what to build.

    Allocate to a pool based on higher-level business case.

    Provide funds in smaller amounts to different product teams and initiatives based on need.

    Product teams define metrics that contribute to given outcomes.

    Track progress and allocate more (or less) funds as appropriate.

    Adapted from Bain, 2019

    Info-Tech Insight

    Changes to funding require changes to product and Agile practices to ensure product ownership and accountability.

    Why is having a common value measure important?

    CIO-CEO Alignment Diagnostic

    A stacked bar graph is shown to demonstrate CIO-CEO Alignment Diagnostic. A bar titled: Business Value Metrics is highlighted. 51% had some improvement necessary and 32% had significant improvement necessary.

    Over 700 Info-Tech members have implemented the Balanced Value Measurement Framework.

    “The cynic knows the price of everything and the value of nothing.”

    – Oscar Wilde

    “Price is what you pay. Value is what you get.”

    – Warren Buffett

    Understanding where you derive value is critical to building solid roadmaps.

    Measure delivery and success

    Metrics and measurements are powerful tools to drive behavior change and decision making in your organization. However, metrics are highly prone to creating unexpected outcomes, so use them with great care. Use metrics judiciously to uncover insights but avoid gaming or ambivalent behavior, productivity loss, and unintended consequences.

    Build good practices in your selection and use of metrics:

    • Choose the metrics that are as close to measuring the desired outcome as possible.
    • Select the fewest metrics possible and ensure they are of the highest value to your team, the safest from gaming behaviors and unintended consequences, and the easiest to gather and report.
    • Never use metrics for reward or punishment; use them to develop your team.
    • Automate as much metrics gathering and reporting as possible.
    • Focus on trends rather than precise metrics values.
    • Review and change your metrics periodically.

    Executive Brief Case Study

    INDUSTRY: Public Sector & Financial Services

    SOURCE: Info-Tech Interviews

    A tale of two product transformations

    Two of the organizations we interviewed shared the challenges they experienced defining product families and the impact these challenges had on their digital transformations.

    A major financial services organization (2,000+ people in IT) had employed a top-down line of business–focused approach and found itself caught in a vicious circle of moving applications between families to resolve cross-LoB dependencies.

    A similarly sized public sector organization suffered from a similar challenge as grouping from the bottom up based on technology areas led to teams fragmented across multiple business units employing different applications built on similar technology foundations.

    Results

    Both organizations struggled for over a year to structure their product families. This materially delayed key aspects of their product-centric transformation, resulting in additional effort and expenditure delivering solutions piecemeal as opposed to as a part of a holistic product family. It took embracing a hybrid top-down and bottom-up approach and beginning with pilot product families to make progress on their transformation.

    A picture of Cole Cioran is shown.

    Cole Cioran

    Practice Lead,

    Applications Practice

    Info-Tech Research Group

    There is no such thing as a perfect product-family structure. There will always be trade-offs when you need to manage shifting demand from stakeholder groups spanning customers, business units, process owners, and technology owners.

    Focusing on a single approach to structure your product families inevitably leads to decisions that are readily challenged or are brittle in the face of changing demand.

    The key to accelerating a product-centric transformation is to build a hybrid model that embraces top-down and bottom-up perspectives to structure and evolve product families over time. Add a robust pilot to evaluate the structure and you have the key to unlocking the potential of product delivery in your organization.

    Info-Tech’s methodology for Deliver Digital Products at Scale

    1. Become a Product-Centric Organization

    2. Organize Products Into Product Families

    3. Ensure Alignment Between Products and Families

    4. Bridge the Gap Between Product Families and Delivery

    5. Build Your Transformation Roadmap and Communication Plan

    Phase Steps

    1.1 Understand the organizational factors driving product-centric delivery

    1.2 Establish your organization’s product inventory

    2.1 Determine your approach to scale product families

    2.2 Define your product families

    3.1 Leverage product family roadmaps

    3.2 Use stakeholder management to improve roadmap communication

    3.3 Configure your product family roadmaps

    3.4 Confirm goal and value alignment of products and their product families

    4.1 Assess your organization’s delivery readiness

    4.2 Understand your delivery options

    4.3 Determine your operating model

    4.4 Identify how to fund product family delivery

    5.1 Introduce your digital product family strategy

    5.2 Communicate changes on updates to your strategy

    5.3 Determine your next steps

    Phase Outcomes
    • Organizational drivers and goals for a product-centric delivery
    • Definition of product
    • Pilot list of products to scale
    • Product scaling principles
    • Scaling approach and direction
    • Product family mapping
    • Enabling applications
    • Dependent applications
    • Product family canvas
    • Approach for communication of product family strategy
    • Stakeholder management plan
    • Defined key pieces of a product family roadmap
    • An approach to confirming alignment between products and product families
    • Assessment of delivery maturity
    • Approach to structuring product delivery
    • Operating model for product delivery
    • Approach for product family funding
    • Product family transformation roadmap
    • Your plan for communicating your roadmap
    • List of actionable next steps to start on your journey

    Blueprint deliverables

    Each step of this blueprint is accompanied by supporting deliverables to help you accomplish your goals:

    Deliver Digital Products at Scale Workbook

    Use this supporting workbook to document interim results from a number of exercises that will contribute to your overall strategy.

    A screenshot of the Scale Workbook is shown.

    Deliver Digital Products at Scale Readiness Assessment

    Your strategy needs to encompass your approaches to delivery. Understand where you need to focus using this simple assessment.

    A screenshot of the Scale Readiness Assessment is shown.

    Key deliverable:

    Digital Product Family Strategy Playbook

    Record the results from the exercises to help you define, detail, and deliver digital products at scale.

    A screenshot of the Digital Product Family Strategy Playbook is shown.

    Blueprint benefits

    IT Benefits

    • Improved product delivery ROI.
    • Improved IT satisfaction and business support.
    • Greater alignment between product delivery and product family goals.
    • Improved alignment between product delivery and organizational models.
    • Better support for Agile/DevOps adoption.

    Business Benefits

    • Increased value realization across product families.
    • Faster delivery of enterprise capabilities.
    • Improved IT satisfaction and business support.
    • Greater alignment between product delivery and product family goals.
    • Uniform understanding of product and product family roadmaps and key milestones.

    Measure the value of this blueprint

    Align product family metrics to product delivery and value realization.

    Member Outcome Suggested Metric Estimated Impact

    Increase business application satisfaction

    Satisfaction with business applications (CIO Business Vision diagnostic)

    20% increase within one year after implementation

    Increase effectiveness of application portfolio management

    Effectiveness of application portfolio management (Management & Governance diagnostic)

    20% increase within one year after implementation

    Increase importance and effectiveness of application portfolio

    Importance and effectiveness to business ( Application Portfolio Assessment diagnostic)

    20% increase within one year after implementation

    Increase satisfaction of support of business operations

    Support to business (CIO Business Vision diagnostic.

    20% increase within one year after implementation

    Successfully deliver committed work (productivity)

    Number of successful deliveries; burndown

    20% increase within one year after implementation

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    "Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful."

    Guided Implementation

    "Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keeps us on track."

    Workshop

    "We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place."

    Consulting

    "Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project."

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks are used throughout all four options.

    Guided Implementation

    What does a typical GI on this topic look like?

    Phase 1: Become a Product-Centric Organization

    Phase 2: Organize Products Into Product Families

    Phase 3: Ensure Alignment Between Products and Families

    Phase 4: Bridge the Gap Between Product Families and Delivery

    Call #1: Scope requirements, objectives, and your specific challenges.

    Call #2: Define products and product families in your context.

    Call #3: Understand the list of products in your context.

    Call #4: Define your scaling principles and goals.

    Call #5: Select a pilot and define your product families.

    Call #6: Understand the product family roadmap as a method to align products to families.

    Call #7: Define components of your product family roadmap and confirm alignment.

    Call #8: Assess your delivery readiness.

    Call #9: Discuss delivery, operating, and funding models relevant to delivering product families.

    Call #10: Wrap up.

    A Guided Implementation (GI) is a series of calls with an Info-Tech analyst to help implement our best practices in your organization. A typical GI is between 8 to 12 calls over the course of 4 to 6 months.

    Workshop Overview

    Contact your account representative for more information.

    workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8889

    Day 1

    Become a Product-Centric Organization

    Day 2

    Organize Products Into Product Families

    Day 3

    Ensure Alignment Between Products and Families

    Day 4

    Bridge the Gap Between Product Families and Delivery

    Advisory

    Next Steps and Wrap-Up (offsite)

    Activities

    1.1 Understand your organizational factors driving product-centric delivery.

    1.2 Establish your organization’s product inventory.

    2.1 Determine your approach to scale product families.

    2.2 Define your product families.

    3.1 Leverage product family roadmaps.

    3.2 Use stakeholder management to improve roadmap communication.

    3.3 Configure your product family roadmaps.

    3.4 Confirm product family to product alignment.

    4.1 Assess your organization’s delivery readiness.

    4.2 Understand your delivery options.

    4.3 Determine your operating model.

    4.4 Identify how to fund product family delivery.

    5.1 Learn how to introduce your digital product family strategy.

    5.2 Communicate changes on updates to your strategy.

    5.3 Determine your next steps.

    1. Execute communication plan and product family changes.
    2. Review the pilot family implementation and update the transformation roadmap.
    3. Begin advisory calls for related blueprints.

    Key Deliverables

    1. Organizational drivers and goals for a product-centric delivery
    2. Definition of product
    3. Product scaling principles
    4. Scaling approach and direction
    5. Pilot list of products to scale
    1. Product family mapping
    2. Enabling applications
    3. Dependent applications
    4. Product family canvas
    1. Current approach for communication of product family strategy
    2. List of product family stakeholders and a prioritization plan for communication
    3. Defined key pieces of a product family roadmap
    4. An approach to confirming alignment between products and product families through a shared definition of business value
    1. Assessment results on your organization’s delivery maturity
    2. A preferred approach to structuring product delivery
    3. Your preferred operating model for delivering product families
    4. Understanding your preferred approach for product family funding
    5. Product family transformation roadmap
    6. Your plan for communicating your roadmap
    7. List of actionable next steps to start on your journey
    1. Organizational communication of product families and product family roadmaps
    2. Product family implementation and updated transformation roadmap
    3. Support for product owners, backlog and roadmap management, and other topics

    Phase 1

    Become a Product-Centric Organization

    Phase 1Phase 2Phase 3Phase 4Phase 5

    1.1 Understand the organizational factors driving product-centric delivery

    1.2 Establish your organization’s product inventory

    2.1 Determine your approach to scale product families

    2.2 Define your product families

    3.1 Leverage product family roadmaps

    3.2 Use stakeholder management to improve roadmap communication

    3.3 Configure your product family roadmaps

    3.4 Confirm product family to product alignment

    4.1 Assess your organization’s delivery readiness

    4.2 Understand your delivery options

    4.3 Determine your operating model

    4.4 Identify how to fund product family delivery

    5.1 Learn how to introduce your digital product family strategy

    5.2 Communicate changes on updates to your strategy

    5.3 Determine your next steps

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    1.1.1 Understand your drivers for product-centric delivery

    1.1.2 Identify the differences between project and product delivery

    1.1.3 Define the goals for your product-centric organization

    1.2.1 Define “product” in your context

    1.2.2 Identify and establish a pilot list of products

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • Product owners
    • Product managers
    • Development team leads
    • Portfolio managers’
    • Business analysts

    Step 1.1

    Understand the organizational factors driving product-centric delivery

    Activities

    1.1.1 Understand your drivers for product-centric delivery

    1.1.2 Identify the differences between project and product delivery

    1.1.3 Define the goals for your product-centric organization

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • Product owners
    • Product managers
    • Development team leads
    • Portfolio managers’
    • Business analysts

    Outcomes of this step

    • Organizational drivers to move to product-centric delivery
    • List of differences between project and product delivery
    • Goals for product-centric delivery

    1.1.1 Understand your drivers for product-centric delivery

    30-60 minutes

    1. Identify your pain points in the current delivery model.
    2. What is the root cause of these pain points?
    3. How will a product-centric delivery model fix the root cause?
    4. Record the results in the Deliver Digital Products at Scale Workbook.
    Pain Points Root Causes Drivers
    • Lack of ownership
    • Siloed departments
    • Accountability

    Output

    • Organizational drivers to move to product-centric delivery.

    Participants

    • Product owners
    • Product managers
    • Development team leads
    • Portfolio managers
    • Business analysts

    Record the results in the Deliver Digital Products at Scale Workbook.

    1.1.2 Identify the differences between project and product delivery

    30-60 minutes

    1. Consider project delivery and product delivery.
    2. Discuss what some differences are between the two.
    3. Note: This exercise is not about identifying the advantages and disadvantages of each style of delivery. This is to identify the variation between the two.

    4. Record the results in the Deliver Digital Products at Scale Workbook.
    Project Delivery Product Delivery
    Point in time What is changed
    Method of funding changes Needs an owner

    Output

    • List of differences between project and product delivery

    Participants

    • Product owners
    • Product managers
    • Development team leads
    • Portfolio managers
    • Business analysts

    Record the results in the Deliver Digital Products at Scale Workbook.

    Identify the differences between a project-centric and a product-centric organization

    Project Product
    Fund projects Funding Fund products or teams
    Line of business sponsor Prioritization Product owner
    Makes specific changes to a product Product management Improves product maturity and support
    Assignment of people to work Work allocation Assignment of work to product teams
    Project manager manages Capacity management Team manages capacity

    Info-Tech Insight

    Product delivery requires significant shifts in the way you complete development work and deliver value to your users. Make the changes that support improving end-user value and enterprise alignment.

    Projects can be a mechanism for funding product changes and improvements

    A flowchart is shown to demonstrate the difference between project lifecycle, hybrid lifecycle, and product lifecycle.

    Projects within products

    Regardless of whether you recognize yourself as a product-based or project-based shop, the same basic principles should apply.

    The purpose of projects is to deliver the scope of a product release. The shift to product delivery leverages a product roadmap and backlog as the mechanism for defining and managing the scope of the release.

    Eventually, teams progress to continuous integration/continuous delivery (CI/CD) where they can release on demand or as scheduled, requiring org change management.

    Use Agile DevOps principles to expedite product-centric delivery and management

    Delivering products does not necessarily require an Agile DevOps mindset. However, Agile methods facilitate the journey because product thinking is baked into them.

    A flowchart is shown to demonstrate the product delivery maturity and the Agile DevOps used.

    Based on: Ambysoft, 2018

    Organizations start with Waterfall to improve the predictable delivery of product features.

    Iterative development shifts the focus from delivery of features to delivery of user value.

    Agile further shifts delivery to consider ROI. Often, the highest-value backlog items aren’t the ones with the highest ROI.

    Lean and DevOps improve your delivery pipeline by providing full integration between product owners, development teams, and operations.

    CI/CD reduces time in process by allowing release on demand and simplifying release and support activities.

    Although teams will adopt parts of all these stages during their journey, it isn’t until you’ve adopted a fully integrated delivery chain that you’ve become product centric.

    1.1.3 Define the goals for your product-centric organization

    30 minutes

    1. Review your list of drivers from exercise 1.1.1 and the differences between project and product delivery from exercise 1.1.2.
    2. Define your goals for achieving a product-centric organization.
    3. Note: Your drivers may have already covered the goals. If so, review if you would like to change the drivers based on your renewed understanding of the differences between project and product delivery.

    Pain PointsRoot CausesDriversGoals
    • Lack of ownership
    • Siloed departments
    • Accountability
    • End-to-end ownership

    Output

    • Goals for product-centric delivery

    Participants

    • Product owners
    • Product managers
    • Development team leads
    • Portfolio managers’
    • Business analysts

    Record the results in the Deliver Digital Products at Scale Workbook.

    Step 1.2

    Establish your organization’s product inventory

    Activities

    1.2.1 Define “product” in your context

    1.2.2 Identify and establish a pilot list of products

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Product owners
    • Product managers
    • Development team leads
    • Portfolio managers’
    • Business analysts

    Outcomes of this step

    • Your organizational definition of products and services
    • A pilot list of active products

    Product does not mean the same thing to everyone

    Do not expect a universal definition of products.

    Every organization and industry has a different definition of what a product is. Organizations structure their people, processes, and technologies according to their definition of the products they manage. Conflicting product definitions between teams increase confusion and misalignment of product roadmaps.

    “A product [is] something (physical or not) that is created through a process and that provides benefits to a market.”

    - Mike Cohn, Founding Member of Agile Alliance and Scrum Alliance

    “A product is something ... that is created and then made available to customers, usually with a distinct name or order number.”

    - TechTarget

    “A product is the physical object ... , software or service from which customer gets direct utility plus a number of other factors, services, and perceptions that make the product useful, desirable [and] convenient.”

    - Mark Curphey

    Organizations need a common understanding of what a product is and how it pertains to the business. This understanding needs to be accepted across the organization.

    “There is not a lot of guidance in the industry on how to define [products]. This is dangerous because what will happen is that product backlogs will be formed in too many areas. All that does is create dependencies and coordination across teams … and backlogs.”

    – Chad Beier, "How Do You Define a Product?” Scrum.org

    Products and services share the same foundation and best practices

    For the purpose of this blueprint, product/service and product owner/service owner are used interchangeably. Product is used for consistency but would apply to services as well.

    Product = Service

    “Product” and “service” are terms that each organization needs to define to fit its culture and customers (internal and external). The most important aspect is consistent use and understanding of:

    • External products
    • Internal products
    • External services
    • Internal services
    • Products as a service (PaaS)
    • Productizing services (SaaS)

    Recognize the different product owner perspectives

    Business:

    • Customer facing, revenue generating

    Technical:

    • IT systems and tools

    Operations

    • Keep the lights on processes

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Product owners must translate needs and constraints from their perspective into the language of their audience. Kathy Borneman, Digital Product Owner at SunTrust Bank, noted the challenges of finding a common language between lines of business and IT (e.g. what is a unit?).

    Info-Tech Insight

    Recognize that product owners represent one of three primary perspectives. Although all share the same capabilities, how they approach their responsibilities is influenced by their perspective.

    “A Product Owner in its most beneficial form acts like an Entrepreneur, like a 'mini-CEO'. The Product Owner is someone who really 'owns' the product.”

    – Robbin Schuurman, “Tips for Starting Product Owners”

    Your product definition should include everything required to support it, not just what users see.

    A picture of an iceburg is shown, showing the ice both above and below the water to demonstrate that the product definition should include everything, not just what users see. On top of the picture are various words to go with the product definition. They inlude: funding, external relationships, adoption, product strategy, stakeholder managment. The product defitions that may not be seen include: Product governance, business functionality, user support, managing and governing data, maintenance and enhancement, R-and-D, requirements analysis and design, code, and knowledge management.

    Establish where product management would be beneficial in the organization

    What does not need product ownership?

    • Individual features
    • Transactions
    • Unstructured data
    • One-time solutions
    • Non-repeatable processes
    • Solutions that have no users or consumers
    • People or teams

    Characteristics of a discrete product

    • Has end users or consumers
    • Delivers quantifiable value
    • Evolves or changes over time
    • Has predictable delivery
    • Has definable boundaries
    • Has a cost to produce and operate

    Product capabilities deliver value!

    These are the various facets of a product. As a product owner, you are responsible for managing these facets through your capabilities and activities.

    A flowchart is shown that demonstrates the various facets of a product.

    It is easy to lose sight of what matters when we look at a product from a single point of view. Despite what The Agile Manifesto says, working software is not valuable without the knowledge and support that people need in order to adopt, use, and maintain it. If you build it, they will not come. Product leaders must consider the needs of all stakeholders when designing and building products.

    Define product value by aligning backlog delivery with roadmap goals

    In each product plan, the backlogs show what you will deliver. Roadmaps identify when and in what order you will deliver value, capabilities, and goals.

    An image is shown to demonstrate the relationship between the product backlog and the product roadmap.

    Product roadmaps guide delivery and communicate your strategy

    In Deliver on Your Digital Product Vision, we demonstrate how the product roadmap is core to value realization. The product roadmap is your communicated path, and as a product owner, you use it to align teams and changes to your defined goals while aligning your product to enterprise goals and strategy.

    An example of a product roadmap is shown to demonstrate how it is the core to value realization.

    Info-Tech Insight

    The quality of your product backlog – and your ability to realize business value from your delivery pipeline – is directly related to the input, content, and prioritization of items in your product roadmap.

    What is a product?

    Not all organizations will define products in the same way. Take this as a general example:

    “A tangible solution, tool, or service (physical or digital) that enables the long-term and evolving delivery of value to customers and stakeholders based on business and user requirements.”

    Info-Tech Insight

    A proper definition of product recognizes three key facts:

    1. Products are long-term endeavors that don’t end after the project finishes.
    2. Products are not just “apps” but can be software or services that drive the delivery of value.
    3. There is more than one stakeholder group that derives value from the product or service.

    1.2.1 Define “product” in your context

    30-60 minutes

    1. Discuss what “product” means in your organization.
    2. Create a common, enterprise-wide definition for “product.”
    3. Record the results in the Deliver Digital Products at Scale Workbook.

    For example:

    • An application, platform, or application family.
    • Discrete items that deliver value to a user/customer.

    Output

    • Your enterprise/organizational definition of products and services

    Participants

    • Product owners
    • Product managers
    • Development team leads
    • Portfolio managers’
    • Business analysts

    Record the results in the Deliver Digital Products at Scale Workbook.

    1.2.2 Identify and establish a pilot list of products

    1-2 hours

    1. Review any current documented application inventory. If you have these details in an existing document, share it with the team. Select the group of applications for your family scaling pilot.
    2. List your initial application inventory on the Product List tab of the Deliver Digital Products at Scale Workbook.
  • For each of the products listed, add the vision and goals of the product. Refer to Deliver on Your Digital Product Vision to learn more about identifying vision and goals or to complete the product vision canvas.
  • You’ll add business capabilities and vision in Phase 2, but you can add these now if they are available in your existing inventory.
  • Output

    • A pilot list of active products

    Participants

    • Product owners
    • Product managers
    • Development team leads
    • Portfolio managers’
    • Business analysts

    Record the results in the Deliver Digital Products at Scale Workbook.

    Phase 2

    Organize Products Into Product Families

    Phase 1Phase 2Phase 3Phase 4Phase 5

    1.1 Understand the organizational factors driving product-centric delivery

    1.2 Establish your organization’s product inventory

    2.1 Determine your approach to scale product families

    2.2 Define your product families

    3.1 Leverage product family roadmaps

    3.2 Use stakeholder management to improve roadmap communication

    3.3 Configure your product family roadmaps

    3.4 Confirm product family to product alignment

    4.1 Assess your organization’s delivery readiness

    4.2 Understand your delivery options

    4.3 Determine your operating model

    4.4 Identify how to fund product family delivery

    5.1 Learn how to introduce your digital product family strategy

    5.2 Communicate changes on updates to your strategy

    5.3 Determine your next steps

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    2.1.1 Define your scaling principles and goals

    2.1.2 Define your pilot product family areas and direction

    2.2.1 Arrange your applications and services into product families

    2.2.2 Define enabling and supporting applications

    2.2.3 Build your product family canvas

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • Product owners
    • Product managers
    • Development team leads
    • Portfolio managers’
    • Business analysts

    Step 2.1

    Determine your approach to scale product families

    Activities

    2.1.1 Define your scaling principles and goals

    2.1.2 Define your pilot product family areas and direction

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Product owners
    • Product managers
    • Development team leads
    • Portfolio managers’
    • Business analysts

    Outcomes of this step

    • List of product scaling principles
    • Scope of product scaling pilot and target areas
    • Scaling approach and direction

    Use consistent terminology for product and service families

    In this blueprint, we refer to any grouping of products or services as a “family.” Your organization may prefer other terms, such as product/service line, portfolio, group, etc. The underlying principles for grouping and managing product families are the same, so define the terminology that fits best with your culture. The same is true for “products” and “services,” which may also be referred to in different terms.

    An example flowchart is displayed to demonstrate the terminology for product and service families.

    A product family is a logical and operational grouping of related products or services. The grouping provides a scaled hierarchy to translate goals, priorities, strategy, and constraints down the grouping while aligning value realization upwards.

    Group product families by related purpose to improve business value

    Families should be scaled by how the products operationally relate to each other, with clear boundaries and common purpose.

    A product family contains...

    • Vision
    • Goals
    • Cumulative roadmap of the products within the family

    A product family can be grouped by...

    • Function
    • Value stream and capability
    • Customer segments or end-user group
    • Strategic purpose
    • Underlying architecture
    • Common technology or support structures
    • And many more
    A flowchart is shown to demonstrate the product family and product relations.

    Scale products into related families to improve value delivery and alignment

    Defining product families builds a network of related products into coordinated value delivery streams.

    A flowchart is shown to demonstrate the relations between product family and the delivery streams.

    “As with basic product management, scaling an organization is all about articulating the vision and communicating it effectively. Using a well-defined framework helps you align the growth of your organization with that of the company. In fact, how the product organization is structured is very helpful in driving the vision of what you as a product company are going to do.”

    – Rich Mironov, Mironov Consulting

    Product families translate enterprise goals into value-enabling capabilities

    A flowchart is shown to demonstrate the relationship between enterprise strategy and enabling capabilities.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Your organizational goals and strategy are achieved through capabilities that deliver value. Your product hierarchy is the mechanism to translate enterprise goals, priorities, and constraints down to the product level where changes can be made.

    Arrange product families by operational groups, not solely by your org chart

    A flowchart is shown to demonstrate how to arrange product families by operational groups.

    1. To align product changes with enterprise goals and priorities, you need to organize your products into operational groups based on the capabilities or business functions the product and family support.

    2. Product managers translate these goals, priorities, and constraints into their product families, so they are actionable at the next level, whether that level is another product family or products implementing enhancements to meet these goals.

    3. The product family manager ensures that the product changes enhance the capabilities that allow you to realize your product family, division, and enterprise goals.

    4. Enabling capabilities realize value and help reach your goals, which then drives your next set of enterprise goals and strategy.

    Product families need owners with a more strategic focus

    Product Owner

    (More tactical product delivery focus)

    • Backlog management and prioritization
    • Product vision and product roadmap
    • Epic/story definition, refinement in conjunction with business stakeholders
    • Sprint planning with Scrum Master and delivery team
    • Working with Scrum Master to minimize disruption to team velocity
    • Ensuring alignment between business and Scrum teams during sprints
    • Profit and loss (P&L) product analysis and monitoring

    Product Manager

    (More strategic product family focus)

    • Product strategy, positioning, and messaging
    • Product family vision and product roadmap
    • Competitive analysis and positioning
    • New product innovation/definition
    • Release timing and focus (release themes)
    • Ongoing optimization of product-related marketing and sales activities
    • P&L product analysis and monitoring

    Info-Tech Insight

    “Product owner” and “product manager” are terms that should be adapted to fit your culture and product hierarchy. These are not management relationships but rather a way to structure related products and services that touch the same end users. Use the terms that work best in your culture.

    Download Build a Better Product Owner for role support.

    2.1.1 Define your scaling principles and goals

    30-60 minutes

    1. Discuss the guiding principles for your product scaling model. Your guiding principles should consider key business priorities, organizational culture, and division/team objectives, such as improving:
    • Business agility and ability to respond to changes and needs.
    • Alignment of product roadmaps to enterprise goals and priorities.
    • Collaboration between stakeholders and product delivery teams.
    • Resource utilization and productivity.
    • The quality and value of products.
    • Coordination between related products and services.

    Output

    • List of product scaling principles

    Participants

    • Product owners
    • Product managers
    • Development team leads
    • Portfolio managers’
    • Business analysts

    Record the results in the Deliver Digital Products at Scale Workbook.

    Start scaling with a pilot

    You will likely use a combination of patterns that work best for each product area. Pilot your product scaling with a domain, team, or functional area before organizing your entire portfolio.

    Learn more about each pattern.

    Discuss the pros and cons of each.

    Select a pilot product area.

    Select a pattern.

    Approach alignment from both directions, validating by the opposite way

    Defining your product families is not a one-way street. Often, we start from either the top or the bottom depending on our scaling principles. We use multiple patterns to find the best arrangement and grouping of our products and families.

    It may be helpful to work partway, then approach your scaling from the opposite direction, meeting in the middle. This way you are taking advantage of the strengths in both approaches.

    Once you have your proposed structure, validate the grouping by applying the principles from the opposite direction to ensure each product and family is in the best starting group.

    As the needs of your organization change, you may need to realign your product families into your new business architecture and operational structure.

    A top-down alignment example is shown.

    When to use: You have a business architecture defined or clear market/functional grouping of value streams.

    A bottom-up alignment example is shown.

    When to use: You are starting from an Application Portfolio Management application inventory to build or validate application families.

    Top-down examples: Start with your enterprise structure or market grouping

    A top-down example flowchart is shown.

    Examples:

    Market Alignment
    • Consumer Banking
      • DDA: Checking, Savings, Money Market
      • Revolving Credit: Credit Cards, Line of Credit
      • Term Credit: Mortgage, Auto, Boat, Installment
    Enterprise Applications
    • Human Resources
      • Benefits: Health, Dental, Life, Retirement
      • Human Capital: Hiring, Performance, Training
      • Hiring: Posting, Interviews, Onboarding
    Shared Service
    • End-User Support
      • Desktop: New Systems, Software, Errors
      • Security: Access Requests, Password Reset, Attestations
    Business Architecture
    • Value Stream
      • Capability
        • Applications
        • Services

    Bottom-up examples: Start with your inventory

    Based on your current inventory, start organizing products and services into related groups using one of the five scaling models discussed in the next step.

    A bottom-up example flowchart is shown.

    Examples:

    Technical Grouping
    • Custom Apps: Java, .NET, Python
    • Cloud: Azure, AWS, Virtual Environments
    • Low Code: ServiceNow, Appian
    Functional/Capability Grouping
    • CRM: Salesforce, Microsoft CRM
    • Security Platforms: IAM, SSO, Scanning
    • Workflow: Remedy, ServiceNow
    Shared Services Grouping
    • Workflow: Appian, Pega, ServiceNow
    • Collaboration: SharePoint, Teams
    • Data: Dictionary, Lake, BI/Reporting

    2.1.2 Define your pilot product family areas and direction

    30-60 minutes

    1. Using your inventory of products for your pilot, consider the top-down and bottom-up approaches.
    2. Identify areas where you will begin arranging your product into families.
    3. Prioritize these pilot areas into waves:
      1. First pilot areas
      2. Second pilot areas
      3. Third pilot areas
    4. Discuss and decide whether a top-down or bottom-up approach is the best place to start for each pilot group.
    5. Prioritize your pilot families in the order in which you want to organize them. This is a guide to help you get started, and you may change the order during the scaling pattern exercise.

    Output

    • Scope of product scaling pilot and target areas

    Participants

    • Product owners
    • Product managers
    • Development team leads
    • Portfolio managers’
    • Business analysts

    Record the results in the Deliver Digital Products at Scale Workbook.

    Step 2.2

    Define your product families

    Activities

    2.2.1 Arrange your applications and services into product families

    2.2.2 Define enabling and supporting applications

    2.2.3 Build your product family canvas

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Product owners
    • Product managers
    • Development team leads
    • Portfolio managers’
    • Business analysts

    Outcomes of this step

    • Product family mapping
    • Product families
    • Enabling applications
    • Dependent applications
    • Product family canvas

    Use three perspectives to guide scaling pattern selection

    • One size does not fit all. There is no single or static product model that fits all product teams.
    • Structure relationships based on your organizational needs and capabilities.
    • Be flexible. Product ownership is designed to enable value delivery.
    • Avoid structures that promote proxy product ownership.
    • Make decisions based on products and services, not people. Then assign people to the roles.
    Alignment perspectives:

    Value Stream

    Align products based on the defined sources of value for a collection of products or services.

    For example: Wholesale channel for products that may also be sold directly to consumers, such as wireless network service.

    Users/Consumers

    Align products based on a common group of users or product consumers.

    For example: Consumer vs. small business vs. enterprise customers in banking, insurance, and healthcare.

    Common Domain

    Align products based on a common domain knowledge or skill set needed to deliver and support the products.

    For example: Applications in a shared service framework supporting other products.

    Leverage patterns for scaling products

    Organizing your products and families is easier when leveraging these grouping patterns. Each is explained in greater detail on the following slides

    Value Stream AlignmentEnterprise ApplicationsShared ServicesTechnicalOrganizational Alignment
    • Business architecture
      • Value stream
      • Capability
      • Function
    • Market/customer segment
    • Line of business (LoB)
    • Example: Customer group > value stream > products
    • Enabling capabilities
    • Enterprise platforms
    • Supporting apps
    • Example: HR > Workday/Peoplesoft > ModulesSupporting: Job board, healthcare administrator
    • Organization of related services into service family
    • Direct hierarchy does not necessarily exist within the family
    • Examples: End-user support and ticketing, workflow and collaboration tools
    • Domain grouping of IT infrastructure, platforms, apps, skills, or languages
    • Often used in combination with Shared Services grouping or LoB-specific apps
    • Examples: Java, .NET, low-code, database, network
    • Used at higher levels of the organization where products are aligned under divisions
    • Separation of product managers from organizational structure no longer needed because the management team owns product management role

    Select the best family pattern to improve alignment

    A flowchart is shown on how to select the best family pattern to improve alignment.

    Use scenarios to help select patterns

    Top-Down

    Bottom-Up

    We have a business architecture defined.

    (See Document Your Business Architecture and industry reference architectures for help.)

    Start with your business architecture

    Start with market segments

    We want to be more customer first or customer centric.

    Start with market segments

    Our organization has rigid lines of business and organizational boundaries.

    Start with LoB structure

    Most products are specific to a business unit or division. Start with LoB structure

    Products are aligned to people, not how we are operationally organized.

    Start with market or LoB structure

    We are focusing on enterprise or enabling applications.

    1. Start with enterprise app and service team

    2. Align supporting apps

    We already have applications and services grouped into teams but want to evaluate if they are grouped in the best families.

    Validate using multiple patterns

    Validate using multiple patterns

    Our applications and services are shared across the enterprise or support multiple products, value streams, or shared capabilities.

    Our applications or services are domain, knowledge, or technology specific.

    Start by grouping inventory

    We are starting from an application inventory. (See the APM Research Center for help.)

    Start by grouping inventory

    Pattern: Value Stream – Capability

    Grouping products into capabilities defined in your business architecture is recommended because it aligns people/processes (services) and products (tools) into their value stream and delivery grouping. This requires an accurate capability map to implement.

    Example:

    • Healthcare is delivered through a series of distinct value streams (top chevrons) and shared services supporting all streams.
    • Diagnosing Health Needs is executed through the Admissions, Testing, Imaging, and Triage capabilities.
    • Products and services are needed to deliver each capability.
    • Shared capabilities can also be grouped into families to better align capability delivery and maturity to ensure that the enterprise goals and needs are being met in each value stream the capabilities support.
    An example is shown to demonstrate how to group products into capabilities.

    Sample business architecture/ capability map for healthcare

    A sample business architecture/capability map for healthcare is shown.

    Your business architecture maps your value streams (value delivered to your customer or user personas) to the capabilities that deliver that value. A capability is the people, processes, and/or tools needed to deliver each value function.

    Defining capabilities are specific to a value stream. Shared capabilities support multiple value streams. Enabling capabilities are core “keep the lights on” capabilities and enterprise functions needed to run your organization.

    See Info-Tech’s industry coverage and reference architectures.

    Download Document Your Business Architecture

    Pattern: Value Stream – Market

    Market/Customer Segment Alignment focuses products into the channels, verticals, or market segments in the same way customers and users view the organization.

    An example is shown to demonstrate how products can be placed into channels, verticals, or market segments.

    Example:

    • Customers want one stop to solve all their issues, needs, and transactions.
    • Banking includes consumer, small business, and enterprise.
    • Consumer banking can be grouped by type of financial service: deposit accounts (checking, savings, money market), revolving credit (credit cards, lines of credit), term lending (mortgage, auto, installment).
    • Each group of services has a unique set of applications and services that support the consumer product, with some core systems supporting the entire relationship.

    Pattern: Value Stream – Line of Business (LoB)

    Line of Business Alignment uses the operational structure as the basis for organizing products and services into families that support each area.

    An example of the operational structure as the basis is shown.

    Example:

    • LoB alignment favors continuity of services, tools, and skills based on internal operations over unified customer services.
    • A hospital requires care and services from many different operational teams.
    • Emergency services may be internally organized by the type of care and emergency to allow specialized equipment and resources to diagnose and treat the patients, relying on support teams for imaging and diagnostics to support care.
    • This model may be efficient and logical from an internal viewpoint but can cause gaps in customer services without careful coordination between product teams.

    Pattern: Enterprise Applications

    A division or group delivers enabling capabilities, and the team’s operational alignment maps directly to the modules/components of an enterprise application and other applications that support the specific business function.

    An example flowchart is shown with enterprise applications.

    Example:

    • Human resources is one corporate function. Within HR, however, there are subfunctions that operate independently.
    • Each operational team is supported by one or more applications or modules within a primary HR system.
    • Even though the teams work independently, the information they manage is shared with or ties into processes used by other teams. Coordination of efforts helps provide a higher level of service and consistency.

    For additional information about HRMS, please download Get the Most Out of Your HRMS.

    Pattern: Shared Services

    Grouping by service type, knowledge area, or technology allows for specialization while families align service delivery to shared business capabilities.

    An example is shown with the shared services.

    Example:

    • Recommended for governance, risk, and compliance; infrastructure; security; end-user support; and shared platforms (workflow, collaboration, imaging/record retention). Direct hierarchies do not necessarily exist within the shared service family.
    • Service groupings are common for service owners (also known as support managers, operations managers, etc.).
    • End-user ticketing comes through a common request system, is routed to the team responsible for triage, and then is routed to a team for resolution.
    • Collaboration tools and workflow tools are enablers of other applications, and product families might support multiple apps or platforms delivering that shared capability.

    Pattern: Technical

    Technical grouping is used in Shared Services or as a family grouping method within a Value Stream Alignment (Capability, Market, LoB) product family.

    An example of technical grouping is shown.

    Example:

    • Within Shared Services, Technical product grouping focuses on domains requiring specific experience and knowledge not common to typical product teams. This can also support insourcing so other product teams do not have to build their own capacity.
    • Within a Market or LoB team, these same technical groups support specific tools and services within that product family only while also specializing in the business domain.
    • Alignment into tool, platform, or skill areas improves delivery capabilities and resource scalability.

    Pattern: Organizational Alignment

    Eventually in your product hierarchy, the management structure functions as the product management team.

    • When planning your product families, be careful determining when to merge product families into the management team structure.
    • Since the goal of scaling products into families is to align product delivery roadmaps to enterprise goals and enable value realization, the primary focus of scaling must be operational.
    • Alignment to the organizational chart should only occur when the product families report into an HR manager who has ownership for the delivery and value realization for all product and services within that family.
    Am example of organizational alignment is shown.

    Download Build a Better Product Owner for role support.

    2.2.1 Arrange your applications and services into product families

    1-4 hours

    1. (Optional but recommended) Define your value streams and capabilities on the App Capability List tab in the Deliver Digital Products at Scale Workbook.
    2. On the Product Families tab, build your product family hierarchy using the following structure:
    • Value Stream > Capability > Family 3 > Family 2 > Family 1 > Product/Service.
    • If you are not using a Value Stream > Capability grouping, you can leave these blank for now.
    A screenshot of the App Capability List in the Deliver Disital Products at Scale Workbook is shown.
  • If you previously completed an application inventory using one of our application portfolio management (APM) resources, you can paste values here. Do not paste cells, as Excel may create a cell reference or replace the current conditional formatting.
  • Output

    • Product family mapping

    Participants

    • Product owners
    • Product managers
    • Development team leads
    • Portfolio managers
    • Business analysts

    Record the results in the Deliver Digital Products at Scale Workbook.

    2.2.2 Define enabling and supporting applications

    1-4 hours

    1. Review your grouping from the reverse direction or with different patterns to validate the grouping. Consider each grouping.
    • Does it operationally align the products and families to best cascade enterprise goals and priorities while validating enabling capabilities?
    • In the next phase, when defining your roadmap strategy, you may wish to revisit this phase and adjust as needed.
  • Select and enter enabling or dependent applications to the right of each product.
  • A screenshot from the Deliver Digitial Products at Scale Workbook is shown.

    Output

    • Product families
    • Enabling applications
    • Dependent applications

    Participants

    • Product owners
    • Product managers
    • Development team leads
    • Portfolio managers
    • Business analysts

    Record the results in the Deliver Digital Products at Scale Workbook.

    Use a product canvas to define key elements of your product family

    A product canvas is an excellent tool for quickly providing important information about a product family.

    Product owners/managers

    Provide target state to align child product and product family roadmaps.

    Stakeholders

    Communicate high-level concepts and key metrics with leadership teams and stakeholders.

    Strategy teams

    Use the canvas as a tool for brainstorming, scoping, and ideation.

    Operations teams

    Share background overview to align operational team with end-user value.

    Impacted users

    Refine communication strategy and support based on user impacts and value realization.

    Download Deliver on Your Digital Product Vision.

    Product Family Canvas: Define your core information

    A screenshot of the product family canvas is shown.

    Problem Statement: The problem or need the product family is addressing

    Business Goals: List of business objectives or goals for the product

    Personas/Customers/Users: List of groups who consume the product/service

    Vision: Vision, unique value proposition, elevator pitch, or positioning statement

    Child Product Families or Products: List of product families or products within this family

    Stakeholders: List of key resources, stakeholders, and teams needed to support the product or service

    Download Deliver on Your Digital Product Vision.

    2.2.3 Build your product family canvas

    30-60 minutes

    1. Complete the following fields to build your product family canvas in your Digital Product Family Strategy Playbook:
      1. Product family name
      2. Product family owner
      3. Parent product family name
      4. Problem that the family is intending to solve (For additional help articulating your problem statement, refer to Deliver on Your Digital Product Vision.)
      5. Product family vision/goals (For additional help writing your vision, refer to Deliver on Your Digital Product Vision..)
      6. Child product or product family name(s)
      7. Primary customers/users (For additional help with your product personas, download and complete Deliver on Your Digital Product Vision..)
      8. Stakeholders (If you aren’t sure who your stakeholders are, fill this in after completing the stakeholder management exercises in phase 3.)

    Output

    • Product family canvas

    Participants

    • Product owners
    • Product managers
    • Development team leads
    • Portfolio managers
    • Business analysts

    Record the results in the Digital Product Family Strategy Playbook.

    A screenshot of the Product Family Canvas is shown.

    Phase 3

    Ensure Alignment Between Products and Families

    Phase 1Phase 2Phase 3Phase 4Phase 5

    1.1 Understand the organizational factors driving product-centric delivery

    1.2 Establish your organization’s product inventory

    2.1 Determine your approach to scale product families

    2.2 Define your product families

    3.1 Leverage product family roadmaps

    3.2 Use stakeholder management to improve roadmap communication

    3.3 Configure your product family roadmaps

    3.4 Confirm product family to product alignment

    4.1 Assess your organization’s delivery readiness

    4.2 Understand your delivery options

    4.3 Determine your operating model

    4.4 Identify how to fund product family delivery

    5.1 Learn how to introduce your digital product family strategy

    5.2 Communicate changes on updates to your strategy

    5.3 Determine your next steps

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • 3.1.1 Evaluate your current approach to product family communication
    • 3.2.1 Visualize interrelationships among stakeholders to identify key influencers
    • 3.2.2 Group stakeholders into categories
    • 3.2.3 Prioritize your stakeholders
    • 3.3.1 Define the communication objectives and audience of your product family roadmaps
    • 3.3.2 Identify the level of detail that you want your product family roadmap artifacts to represent
    • 3.4.1 Validate business value alignment between products and their product families

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • Product owners
    • Product managers
    • Portfolio managers
    • Business analysts

    Step 3.1

    Leverage product family roadmaps

    Activities

    3.1.1 Evaluate your current approach to product family communication

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Product owners
    • Product managers
    • Portfolio managers
    • Business analysts

    Outcomes of this step

    • Understanding of what a product family roadmap is
    • Comparison of Info-Tech’s position on product families to how you currently communicate about product families

    Aligning products’ goals with families

    Without alignment between product family goals and their underlying products, you aren’t seeing the full picture.

    An example of a product roadmap is shown to demonstrate how it is the core to value realization.

    Adapted from: Pichler," What Is Product Management?"

    • Aligning product strategy to enterprise goals needs to happen through the product family.
    • A product roadmap has traditionally been used to express the overall intent and visualization of the product strategy.
    • Connecting the strategy of your products with your enterprise goals can be done through the product family roadmap.

    Leveraging product family roadmaps

    It’s more than a set of colorful boxes.

      ✓ Lays out a strategy for your product family.

      ✓ Is a statement of intent for your family of products.

      ✓ Communicates direction for the entire product family and product teams.

      ✓ Directly connects to the organization’s goals.

    However, it is not:

      x Representative of a hard commitment.

      x A simple combination of your current product roadmaps.

      x A technical implementation plan.

    Product family roadmaps

    A roadmap is shown without any changes.

    There is no such thing as a roadmap that never changes.

    Your product family roadmap represents a broad statement of intent and high-level tactics to get closer to the organization’s goals.

    A roadmap is shown with changes.

    All good product family roadmaps embrace change!

    Your strategic intentions are subject to volatility, especially those planned further in the future. The more costs you incur in planning, the more you leave yourself exposed to inefficiency and waste if those plans change.

    Info-Tech Insight

    A good product family roadmap is intended to manage and communicate the inevitable changes as a result of market volatility and changes in strategy.

    Product family roadmaps are more strategic by nature

    While individual product roadmaps can be different levels of tactical or strategic depending on a variety of market factors, your options are more limited when defining roadmaps for product families.

    An image is displayed to show the relationships between product and product family, and how the roadmaps could be tactical or strategic.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Roadmaps for your product family are, by design, less detailed. This does not mean they aren’t actionable! Your product family roadmap should be able to communicate clear intentions around the future delivery of value in both the near and long term.

    Reminder: Your enterprise vision provides alignment for your product family roadmaps

    Not knowing the difference between enterprise vision and goals will prevent you from both dreaming big and achieving your dream.

    Your enterprise vision represents your “north star” – where you want to go. It represents what you want to do.

    • Your enterprise goals represent what you need to achieve in order to reach your enterprise vision.
    • A key element of operationalizing your vision.
    • Your strategy, initiatives, and features will align with one or more goals.

    Download Deliver on Your Digital Product Vision for support.

    Multiple roadmap views can communicate differently, yet tell the same truth

    Audience

    Business/ IT Leaders

    Users/Customers

    Delivery Teams

    Roadmap View

    Portfolio

    Product Family

    Technology

    Objectives

    To provide a snapshot of the portfolio and priority products

    To visualize and validate product strategy

    To coordinate broad technology and architecture decisions

    Artifacts

    Line items or sections of the roadmap are made up of individual products, and an artifact represents a disposition at its highest level.

    Artifacts are generally grouped by product teams and consist of strategic goals and the features that realize those goals.

    Artifacts are grouped by the teams who deliver that work and consist of technical capabilities that support the broader delivery of value for the product family.

    Typical elements of a product family roadmap

    While there are others, these represent what will commonly appear across most family-based roadmaps.

    An example is shown to highlight the typical elements of a product family roadmap.

    GROUP/CATEGORY: Groups are collections of artifacts. In a product family context, these are usually product family goals, value streams, or products.

    ARTIFACT: An artifact is one of many kinds of tangible by-products produced during the delivery of products. For a product family, the artifacts represented are capabilities or value streams.

    MILESTONE: Points in the timeline when established sets of artifacts are complete. This is a critical tool in the alignment of products in a given family.

    TIME HORIZON: Separated periods within the projected timeline covered by the roadmap.

    3.1.1 Evaluate your current approach to product family communication

    1-2 hours

    1. Write down how you currently communicate your intentions for your products and family of products.
    2. Compare and contrast this to how this blueprint defines product families and product family roadmaps.
    3. Consider the similarities and the key gaps between your current approach and Info-Tech’s definition of product family roadmaps.

    Output

    • Your documented approach to product family communication

    Participants

    • Product owners
    • Stakeholders

    Record the results in the Deliver Digital Products at Scale Workbook.

    Step 3.2

    Use stakeholder management to improve roadmap communication

    Activities

    3.2.1 Visualize interrelationships among stakeholders to identify key influencers

    3.2.2 Group stakeholders into categories

    3.2.3 Prioritize your stakeholders

    Info-Tech Note

    If you have done the stakeholder exercises in Deliver on Your Digital Product Vision or Build a Better Product Owner u don’t need to repeat the exercises from scratch.

    You can bring the results forward and update them based on your prior work.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Product owners
    • Product managers
    • Portfolio managers
    • Business analysts

    Outcomes of this step

    • Relationships among stakeholders and influencers
    • Categorization of stakeholders and influencers
    • Stakeholder and influencer prioritization

    Reminder: Not everyone is a user!

    USERS

    Individuals who directly obtain value from usage of the product.

    STAKEHOLDERS

    Represent individuals who provide the context, alignment, and constraints that influence or control what you will be able to accomplish.

    FUNDERS

    Individuals both external and internal that fund the product initiative. Sometimes they are lumped in as stakeholders. However, motivations can be different.

    For more information, see Deliver on Your Digital Product Vision.

    A stakeholder strategy is a key part of product family attainment

    A roadmap is only “good” when it effectively communicates to stakeholders. Understanding your stakeholders is the first step in delivering great product family roadmaps.

    A picture is shown that has 4 characters with puzzle pieces, each repersenting a key to product family attainment. The four keys are: Stakeholder management, product lifecycle, project delivery, and operational support.

    Create a stakeholder network map for product roadmaps and prioritization

    Follow the trail of breadcrumbs from your direct stakeholders to their influencers to uncover hidden stakeholders.

    An example stakeholder network map is displayed.

    Legend

    Black arrows: indicate the direction of professional influence

    Dashed green arrows: indicate bidirectional, informal influence relationships

    Info-Tech Insight

    Your stakeholder map defines the influence landscape your product family operates in. It is every bit as important as the teams who enhance, support, and operate your product directly.

    Use connectors to determine who may be influencing your direct stakeholders. They may not have any formal authority within the organization, but they may have informal yet substantial relationships with your stakeholders.

    3.2.1 Visualize interrelationships among stakeholders to identify key influencers

    60 minutes

    1. List direct stakeholders for your product.
    2. Determine the stakeholders of your stakeholders and consider adding each of them to the stakeholder list.
    3. Assess who has either formal or informal influence over your stakeholders; add these influencers to your stakeholder list.
    4. Construct a diagram linking stakeholders and their influencers together.
    • Use black arrows to indicate the direction of professional influence.
    • Use dashed green arrows to indicate bidirectional, informal influence relationships.

    Output

    • Relationships among stakeholders and influencers

    Participants

    • Product owners
    • Stakeholders

    Record the results in the Deliver Digital Products at Scale Workbook.

    Categorize your stakeholders with a prioritization map

    A stakeholder prioritization map helps product leaders categorize their stakeholders by their level of influence and ownership in the product and/or teams.

    An example stakeholder prioritization map is shown.

    There are four areas in the map, and the stakeholders within each area should be treated differently.

    Players – players have a high interest in the initiative and the influence to effect change over the initiative. Their support is critical, and a lack of support can cause significant impediment to the objectives.

    Mediators – mediators have a low interest but significant influence over the initiative. They can help to provide balance and objective opinions to issues that arise.

    Noisemakers – noisemakers have low influence but high interest. They tend to be very vocal and engaged, either positively or negatively, but have little ability to enact their wishes.

    Spectators – generally, spectators are apathetic and have little influence over or interest in the initiative.

    3.2.2 Group stakeholders into categories

    30-60 minutes

    1. Identify your stakeholders’ interest in and influence on your product as high, medium, or low by rating the attributes below.
    2. Map your results to the model below to determine each stakeholder’s category.
    Level of Influence
    • Power: Ability of a stakeholder to effect change.
    • Urgency: Degree of immediacy demanded.
    • Legitimacy: Perceived validity of stakeholder’s claim.
    • Volume: How loud their “voice” is or could become.
    • Contribution: What they have that is of value to you.
    Level of Interest

    How much are the stakeholder’s individual performance and goals directly tied to the success or failure of the product?

    The example stakeholder prioritization map is shown with the stakeholders grouped into the categories.

    Output

    • Categorization of stakeholders and influencers

    Participants

    • Product owners
    • Stakeholders

    Record the results in the Deliver Digital Products at Scale Workbook.

    Prioritize your stakeholders

    There may be too many stakeholders to be able to manage them all. Focus your attention on the stakeholders that matter most.

    Level of Support

    Stakeholder Category

    Supporter

    Evangelist

    Neutral Blocker

    Player

    Critical

    High

    High

    Critical

    Mediator

    Medium

    Low

    Low

    Medium

    Noisemaker

    High

    Medium

    Medium

    High

    Spectator

    Low

    Irrelevant

    Irrelevant

    Low

    Consider the three dimensions for stakeholder prioritization: influence, interest, and support. Support can be determined by answering the following question: How likely is it that this stakeholder would recommend your product?

    These parameters are used to prioritize which stakeholders are most important and should receive your focused attention.

    3.2.3 Prioritize your stakeholders

    30 minutes

    1. Identify the level of support of each stakeholder by answering the following question: How likely is it that this stakeholder would endorse your product?
    2. Prioritize your stakeholders using the prioritization scheme on the previous slide.

    Stakeholder

    Category

    Level of Support

    Prioritization

    CMO

    Spectator

    Neutral

    Irrelevant

    CIO

    Player

    Supporter

    Critical

    Output

    • Stakeholder and influencer prioritization

    Participants

    • Product owners
    • Stakeholders

    Record the results in the Deliver Digital Products at Scale Workbook.

    Define strategies for engaging stakeholders by type

    An example is shown to demonstrate how to define strategies to engage staeholders by type.

    Type

    Quadrant

    Actions

    Players

    High influence, high interest – actively engage

    Keep them updated on the progress of the project. Continuously involve Players in the process and maintain their engagement and interest by demonstrating their value to its success.

    Mediators

    High influence, low interest – keep satisfied

    They can be the game changers in groups of stakeholders. Turn them into supporters by gaining their confidence and trust and including them in important decision-making steps. In turn, they can help you influence other stakeholders.

    Noisemakers

    Low influence, high interest – keep informed

    Try to increase their influence (or decrease it if they are detractors) by providing them with key information, supporting them in meetings, and using Mediators to help them.

    Spectators

    Low influence, low interest – monitor

    They are followers. Keep them in the loop by providing clarity on objectives and status updates.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Each group of stakeholders draws attention and resources away from critical tasks. By properly identifying your stakeholder groups, the product owner can develop corresponding actions to manage stakeholders in each group. This can dramatically reduce wasted effort trying to satisfy Spectators and Noisemakers, while ensuring the needs of Mediators and Players are met.

    Step 3.3

    Configure your product family roadmaps

    Activities

    3.3.1 Define the communication objectives and audience of your product family roadmaps

    3.3.2 Identify the level of detail that you want your product family roadmap artifacts to represent

    Info-Tech Note

    If you are unfamiliar with product roadmaps, Deliver on Your Digital Product Vision contains more detailed exercises we recommend you review before focusing on product family roadmaps.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Product owners
    • Product managers
    • Portfolio managers
    • Business analysts

    Outcomes of this step

    • An understanding of the key communication objectives and target stakeholder audience for your product family roadmaps
    • A position on the level of detail you want your product family roadmap to operate at

    Your communication objectives are linked to your audience; ensure you know your audience and speak their language

    I want to... I need to talk to... Because they are focused on...
    ALIGN PRODUCT TEAMS Get my delivery teams on the same page. Architects Products Owners PRODUCTS A product that delivers value against a common set of goals and objectives.
    SHOWCASE CHANGES Inform users and customers of product strategy. Bus. Process Owners End Users FUNCTIONALITY A group of functionality that business customers see as a single unit.
    ARTICULATE RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS Inform the business of product development requirements. IT Management Business Stakeholders FUNDING An initiative that those with the money see as a single budget.

    3.3.1 Define the communication objectives and audience of your product family roadmaps

    30-60 minutes

    1. Explicitly state the communication objectives and audience of your roadmap.
    • Think of finishing this sentence: This roadmap is designed for … in order to …
  • You may want to consider including more than a single audience or objective.
  • Example:
  • Roadmap

    Audience

    Statement

    Internal Strategic Roadmap

    Internal Stakeholders

    This roadmap is designed to detail the strategy for delivery. It tends to use language that represents internal initiatives and names.

    Customer Strategic Roadmap

    External Customers

    This roadmap is designed to showcase and validate future strategic plans and internal teams to coordinate the development of features and enablers.

    Output

    • Roadmap list with communication objectives and audience

    Participants

    • Product owners and product managers
    • Application leaders
    • Stakeholders

    Record the results in the Deliver Digital Products at Scale Workbook.

    The length of time horizons on your roadmap depend on the needs of the underlying products or families

    Info-Tech InsightAn example timeline is shown.

    Given the relationship between product and product family roadmaps, the product family roadmap needs to serve the time horizons of its respective products.

    This translates into product family roadmaps with timelines that, at a minimum, cover the full scope of the respective product roadmaps.

    Based on your communication objectives, consider different ways to visualize your product family roadmap

    Swimline/Stream-Based roadmap example.

    Swimlane/Stream-Based – Understanding when groups of items intend to be delivered.

    An example is shown that has an overall plan with rough intentions around delivery.

    Now, Next, Later – Communicate an overall plan with rough intentions around delivery without specific date ranges.

    An example of a sunrise roadmap is shown.

    Sunrise Roadmap – Articulate the journey toward a given target state across multiple streams.

    Before connecting your family roadmap to products, think about what each roadmap typically presents

    An example of a product family roadmap is shown and how it can be connected to the products.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Your product family roadmap and product roadmap tell different stories. The product family roadmap represents the overall connection of products to the enterprise strategy, while the product roadmap focuses on the fulfillment of the product’s vision.

    Example: Connecting your product family roadmaps to product roadmaps

    Your roadmaps should be connected at an artifact level that is common between both. Typically, this is done with capabilities, but you can do it at a more granular level if an understanding of capabilities isn’t available.

    Example is shown connecting product family roadmaps to product roadmaps.

    3.3.2 Identify the level of detail that you want your product family roadmap artifacts to represent

    30-60 minutes

    1. Consider the different available artifacts for a product family (goals, value stream, capabilities).
    2. List the roadmaps that you wish to represent.
    3. Based on how you currently articulate details on your product families, consider:
    • What do you want to use as the level of granularity for the artifact? Consider selecting something that has a direct connection to the product roadmap itself (for example, capabilities).
    • For some roadmaps you will want to categorize your artifacts – what would work best in those cases?

    Examples

    Level of Hierarchy

    Artifact Type

    Roadmap 1

    Goals

    Capability

    Roadmap 2

    Roadmap 3

    Output

    • Details on your roadmap granularity

    Participants

    • Product owners
    • Product managers
    • Portfolio managers

    Record the results in the Deliver Digital Products at Scale Workbook.

    Step 3.4

    Confirm goal and value alignment of products and their product families

    Activities

    3.4.1 Validate business value alignment between products and their product families

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Product owners
    • Product managers
    • Portfolio managers
    • Business analysts

    Outcomes of this step

    • Validation of the alignment between your product families and products

    Confirming product to family value alignment

    It isn’t always obvious whether you have the right value delivery alignment between products and product families.

    An example is shown to demonstrate product-to-family-alignment.

    Product-to-family alignment can be validated in two different ways:

    1. Initial value alignment
    2. Confirm the perceived business value at a family level is aligned with what is being delivered at a product level.

    3. Value measurement during the lifetime of the product
    4. Validate family roadmap attainment through progression toward the specified product goals.

    For more detail on calculating business value, see Build a Value Measurement Framework.

    To evaluate a product family’s contribution, you need a common definition of value

    Why is having a common value measure important?

    CIO-CEO Alignment Diagnostic

    A stacked bar graph is shown to demonstrate CIO-CEO Alignment Diagnostic. A bar titled Business Value Metrics is highlighted. 51% had some improvement necessary and 32% had significant improvement necessary.

    Over 700 Info-Tech members have implemented the Balanced Value Measurement Framework.

    “The cynic knows the price of everything and the value of nothing.”

    – Oscar Wilde

    “Price is what you pay. Value is what you get.”

    – Warren Buffett

    Understanding where you derive value is critical to building solid roadmaps.

    All value in your product family is not created equal

    Business value is the value of the business outcome the application produces and how effective the product is at producing that outcome. Dissecting value by the benefit type and the value source allows you to see the many ways in which a product or service brings value to your organization. Capture the value of your products in short, concise statements, like an elevator pitch.

    A business value matrix is shown.

    Increase Revenue

    Product or service functions that are specifically related to the impact on your organization’s ability to generate revenue.

    Reduce Costs

    Reduction of overhead. The ways in which your product limits the operational costs of business functions.

    Enhance Services

    Functions that enable business capabilities that improve the organization’s ability to perform its internal operations.

    Reach Customers

    Application functions that enable and improve the interaction with customers or produce market information and insights.

    Financial Benefits vs. Improved Capabilities

    • Financial Benefit refers to the degree to which the value source can be measured through monetary metrics and is often quite tangible.
    • Human Benefit refers to how a product or service can deliver value through a user’s experience.

    Inward vs. Outward Orientation

    • Inward refers to value sources that have an internal impact and improve your organization’s effectiveness and efficiency in performing its operations.
    • Outward refers to value sources that come from your interaction with external factors, such as the market or your customers.

    3.4.1 Validate business value alignment between products and their product families

    30-60 minutes

    1. Draw the 2x2 Business Value Matrix on a flip chart or open the Business Value Matrix tab in the Deliver Digital Products at Scale Workbook to use in this exercise.
    2. Brainstorm and record the different types of business value that your product and product family produce on the sticky notes (one item per sticky note).
    3. As a team, evaluate how the product value delivered contributes to the product family value delivered. Note any gaps or differences between the two.

    Download and complete Build a Value Measurement Framework for full support in focusing product delivery on business value–driven outcomes.

    A business value matrix is shown.

    Output

    • Confirmation of value alignment between product families and their respective products

    Participants

    • Product owners
    • Product managers

    Record the results in the Deliver Digital Products at Scale Workbook.

    Example: Validate business value alignment between products and their product families

    An example of a business value matrix is shown.

    Measure product value with metrics tied to your business value sources and objectives

    Assign metrics to your business value sources

    Business Value Category

    Source Examples

    Metric Examples

    Profit Generation

    Revenue

    Customer Lifetime Value (LTV)

    Data Monetization

    Average Revenue per User (ARPU)

    Cost Reduction

    Reduce Labor Costs

    Contract Labor Cost

    Reduce Overhead

    Effective Cost per Install (eCPI)

    Service Enablement

    Limit Failure Risk

    Mean Time to Mitigate Fixes

    Collaboration

    Completion Time Relative to Deadline

    Customer and Market Reach

    Customer Satisfaction

    Net Promoter Score

    Customer Trends

    Number of Customer Profiles

    The importance of measuring business value through metrics

    The better an organization is at using business value metrics to evaluate IT’s performance, the more satisfied the organization is with IT’s performance as a business partner. In fact, those that say they’re effective at business value metrics have satisfaction scores that are 30% higher than those that believe significant improvements are necessary (Info-Tech’s IT diagnostics).

    Assigning metrics to your prioritized values source will allow you to more accurately measure a product’s value to the organization and identify optimization opportunities. See Info-Tech’s Related Research: Value, Delivery Metrics, Estimation blueprint for more information.

    Your product delivery pipeline connects your roadmap with business value realization

    The effectiveness of your product roadmap needs to be evaluated based on delivery capacity and throughput.

    A product roadmap is shown with additional details to demonstrate delivery capacity and throughput.

    When thinking about product delivery metrics, be careful what you ask for…

    As the saying goes “Be careful what you ask for, because you will probably get it.”

    Metrics are powerful because they drive behavior.

    • Metrics are also dangerous because they often lead to unintended negative outcomes.
    • Choose your metrics carefully to avoid getting what you asked for instead of what you intended.

    It’s a cautionary tale that also offers a low-risk path through the complexities of metrics use.

    For more information on the use (and abuse) of metrics, see Select and Use SDLC Metrics Effectively.

    Measure delivery and success

    Metrics and measurements are powerful tools to drive behavior change and decision making in your organization. However, metrics are highly prone to creating unexpected outcomes, so use them with great care. Use metrics judiciously to uncover insights but avoid gaming or ambivalent behavior, productivity loss, and unintended consequences.

    Build good practices in your selection and use of metrics:

    • Choose the metrics that are as close to measuring the desired outcome as possible.
    • Select the fewest metrics possible and ensure they are of the highest value to your team, the safest from gaming behaviors and unintended consequences, and the easiest to gather and report.
    • Never use metrics for reward or punishment; use them to develop your team.
    • Automate as much metrics gathering and reporting as possible.
    • Focus on trends rather than precise metrics values.
    • Review and change your metrics periodically.

    Phase 4

    Bridge the Gap Between Product Families and Delivery

    Phase 1Phase 2Phase 3Phase 4Phase 5

    1.1 Understand the organizational factors driving product-centric delivery

    1.2 Establish your organization’s product inventory

    2.1 Determine your approach to scale product families

    2.2 Define your product families

    3.1 Leverage product family roadmaps

    3.2 Use stakeholder management to improve roadmap communication

    3.3 Configure your product family roadmaps

    3.4 Confirm product family to product alignment

    4.1 Assess your organization’s delivery readiness

    4.2 Understand your delivery options

    4.3 Determine your operating model

    4.4 Identify how to fund product family delivery

    5.1 Learn how to introduce your digital product family strategy

    5.2 Communicate changes on updates to your strategy

    5.3 Determine your next steps

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    4.1.1 Assess your organization’s readiness to deliver digital product families

    4.2.1 Consider pros and cons for each delivery model relative to how you wish to deliver

    4.3.1 Understand the relationships between product management, delivery teams, and stakeholders

    4.4.1 Discuss traditional vs. product-centric funding methods

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • Product owners
    • Product managers
    • Portfolio managers
    • Delivery managers

    Assess the impacts of product-centric delivery on your teams and org design

    Product delivery can exist within any org structure or delivery model. However, when making the shift toward product management, consider optimizing your org design and product team structure to match your capacity and throughput needs.

    A flowchart is shown to see how the impacts of product-centric delivery can impact team and org designs.

    Info-Tech Note

    Realigning your delivery pipeline and org design takes significant effort and time. Although we won’t solve these questions here, it’s important to identify factors in your current or future models that improve value delivery.

    Step 4.1

    Assess your organization’s delivery readiness

    Activities

    4.1.1 Assess your organization’s readiness to deliver digital product families

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Product owners
    • Product managers
    • Portfolio managers
    • Delivery managers

    Outcomes of this step

    • An understanding of the group’s maturity level when it comes to product delivery

    Maturing product practices enables delivery of product families, not just products or projects

    A flowchart is shown to demonstrate the differences between project lifecycle, hybrid lifecycle, and product lifecycle.

    Just like product owners, product family owners are needed to develop long-term product value, strategy, and delivery. Projects can still be used as the source of funding and change management; however, the product family owner must manage product releases and operational support. The focus of this section will be on aligning product families to one or more releases.

    4.1.1 Assess your organization’s readiness to deliver digital product families

    30-60 minutes

    1. For each question in the Deliver Digital Products at Scale Readiness Assessment, ask yourself which of the five associated maturity statements most closely describes your organization.
    2. As a group, agree on your organization’s current readiness score for each of the six categories.

    A screenshot of the Deliver Digital Products at Scale Readiness Assessment is shown.

    Output

    • Product delivery readiness score

    Participants

    • Product managers
    • Product owners

    Download the Deliver Digital Products at Scale Readiness Assessment.

    Value realization is constrained by your product delivery pipeline

    Value is realized through changes made at the product level. Your pipeline dictates the rate, quality, and prioritization of your backlog delivery. This pipeline connects your roadmap goals to the value the goals are intended to provide.

    An example of a product roadmap is shown with the additional details of the product delivery pipeline being highlighted.

    Product delivery realizes value for your product family

    While planning and analysis are done at the family level, work and delivery are done at the individual product level.

    PRODUCT STRATEGY

    What are the artifacts?

    What are you saying?

    Defined at the family level?

    Defined at the product level?

    Vision

    I want to...

    Strategic focus

    Delivery focus

    Goals

    To get there we need to...

    Roadmap

    To achieve our goals, we’ll deliver...

    Backlog

    The work will be done in this order...

    Release Plan

    We will deliver in the following ways...

    Step 4.2

    Understand your delivery options

    Activities

    4.2.1 Consider pros and cons for each delivery model relative to how you wish to deliver

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Product owners
    • Product managers
    • Portfolio managers
    • Delivery managers

    Outcomes of this step

    • An understanding of the different team configuration options when it comes to delivery and their relevance to how you currently work

    Define the scope of your product delivery strategy

    The goal of your product delivery strategy is to establish streamlined, enforceable, and standardized product management and delivery capabilities that follow industry best practices. You will need to be strategic in how and where you implement your changes because this will set the stage for future adoption. Strategically select the most appropriate products, roles, and areas of your organization to implement your new or enhanced capabilities and establish a foundation for scaling.

    Successful product delivery requires people who are knowledgeable about the products they manage and have a broad perspective of the entire delivery process, from intake to delivery, and of the product portfolio. The right people also have influence with other teams and stakeholders who are directly or indirectly impacted by product decisions. Involve team members who have expertise in the development, maintenance, and management of your selected products and stakeholders who can facilitate and promote change.

    Learn about different patterns to structure and resource your product delivery teams

    The primary goal of any product delivery team is to improve the delivery of value for customers and the business based on your product definition and each product’s demand. Each organization will have different priorities and constraints, so your team structure may take on a combination of patterns or may take on one pattern and then transform into another.

    Delivery Team Structure Patterns

    How Are Resources and Work Allocated?

    Functional Roles

    Teams are divided by functional responsibilities (e.g. developers, testers, business analysts, operations, help desk) and arranged according to their placement in the software development lifecycle (SDLC).

    Completed work is handed off from team to team sequentially as outlined in the organization’s SDLC.

    Shared Service and Resource Pools

    Teams are created by pulling the necessary resources from pools (e.g. developers, testers, business analysts, operations, help desk).

    Resources are pulled whenever the work requires specific skills or pushed to areas where product demand is high.

    Product or System

    Teams are dedicated to the development, support, and management of specific products or systems.

    Work is directly sent to the teams who are directly managing the product or directly supporting the requester.

    Skills and Competencies

    Teams are grouped based on skills and competencies related to technology (e.g. Java, mobile, web) or familiarity with business capabilities (e.g. HR, finance).

    Work is directly sent to the teams who have the IT and business skills and competencies to complete the work.

    See the flow of work through each delivery team structure pattern

    Four delivery team structures are shown. The four are: functional roles, shared service and resource pools, product or system, and skills and competencies.

    Staffing models for product teams

    Functional Roles Shared Service and Resource Pools Product or System Skills and Competencies
    A screenshot of the functional roles from the flow of work example is shown. A screenshot of the shared service and resource pools from the flow of work example is shown. A screenshot of the product or system from the flow of work example is shown. A screenshot of skills and competencies from the flow of work example is shown.
    Pros
      ✓ Specialized resources are easier to staff

      ✓ Product knowledge is maintained

      ✓ Flexible demand/capacity management

      ✓ Supports full utilization of resources

      ✓ Teams are invested in the full life of the product

      ✓ Standing teams enable continuous improvement

      ✓ Teams are invested in the technology

      ✓ Standing teams enable continuous improvement

    Cons
      x Demand on specialists can create bottlenecks

      x Creates barriers to collaboration

      x Unavailability of resources can lead to delays

      x Product knowledge can be lost as resources move

      x Changes in demand can lead to downtime

      x Cross-functional skills make staffing a challenge

      x Technology bias can lead to the wrong solution

      x Resource contention when team supports multiple solutions

    Considerations
      ! Product owners must break requests down into very small components to support Agile delivery as mini-Waterfalls
      ! Product owners must identify specialist requirements in the roadmap to ensure resources are available
      ! Product owners must ensure that there is a sufficient backlog of valuable work ready to keep the team utilized
      ! Product owners must remain independent of technology to ensure the right solution is built
    Use Case
    • When you lack people with cross-functional skills
    • When you have specialists such as those skilled in security and operations who will not have full-time work on the product
    • When you have people with cross-functional skills who can self-organize around the request
    • When you have a significant investment in a specific technology stack

    4.2.1 Consider pros and cons for each delivery model relative to how you wish to deliver

    1. Document your current staffing model for your product delivery teams.
    2. Evaluate the pros and cons of each model, as specified on the previous slide, relative to how you currently work.
    3. What would be the ideal target state for your team? If one model does not completely fit, is there a hybrid option worth considering? For example: Product-Based combined with Shared Service/Resource Pools for specific roles.

    Functional Roles

    Teams are divided by functional responsibilities (e.g. developers, testers, business analysts, operations, help desk) and arranged according to their placement in the software development lifecycle (SDLC).

    Shared Service and Resource Pools

    Teams are created by pulling the necessary resources from pools (e.g. developers, testers, business analysts, operations, help desk).

    Product or System

    Teams are dedicated to the development, support, and management of specific products or systems.

    Skills and Competencies

    Teams are grouped based on skills and competencies related to technology (e.g. Java, mobile, web) or familiarity with business capabilities (e.g. HR, finance).

    Output

    • An understanding of pros and cons for each delivery model and the ideal target state for your team

    Participants

    • Product managers
    • Product owners

    Record the results in the Digital Product Family Strategy Playbook.

    Step 4.3

    Determine your operating model

    Activities

    4.3.1 Understand the relationships between product management, delivery teams, and stakeholders

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Product owners
    • Product managers
    • Portfolio managers
    • Delivery managers

    Outcomes of this step

    • An understanding of the potential operating models and what will work best for your organization

    Reminder: Patterns for scaling products

    The alignment of your product families should be considered in your operating model.

    Value Stream Alignment

    Enterprise Applications

    Shared Services

    Technical

    Organizational Alignment

    • Business architecture
      • Value stream
      • Capability
      • Function
    • Market/customer segment
    • Line of business (LoB)
    • Example: Customer group > value stream > products
    • Enabling capabilities
    • Enterprise platforms
    • Supporting apps
    • Example: HR > Workday/Peoplesoft > ModulesSupporting: Job board, healthcare administrator
    • Organization of related services into service family
    • Direct hierarchy does not necessarily exist within the family
    • Examples: End-user support and ticketing, workflow and collaboration tools
    • Domain grouping of IT infrastructure, platforms, apps, skills, or languages
    • Often used in combination with Shared Services grouping or LoB-specific apps
    • Examples: Java, .NET, low-code, database, network
    • Used at higher levels of the organization where products are aligned under divisions
    • Separation of product managers from organizational structure no longer needed because the management team owns product management role

    Ensure consistency in the application of your design principles with a coherent operating model

    What is an operating model?

    An operating model is an abstract visualization, used like an architect’s blueprint, that depicts how structures and resources are aligned and integrated to deliver on the organization’s strategy. It ensures consistency of all elements in the organizational structure through a clear and coherent blueprint before embarking on detailed organizational design

    The visual should highlight which capabilities are critical to attaining strategic goals and clearly show the flow of work so that key stakeholders can understand where inputs flow in and outputs flow out of the IT organization.

    An example of an operating model is shown.

    For more information, see Redesign Your IT Organizational Structure.

    Weigh the pros and cons of IT operating models to find the best fit

    1. LoB/Product Aligned – Decentralized Model: Line of Business, Geographically, Product, or Functionally Aligned
    2. A decentralized IT operating model that embeds specific functions within LoBs/product teams and provides cross-organizational support for their initiatives.

    3. Hybrid Functional: Functional/Product Aligned
    4. A best-of-both-worlds model that balances the benefits of centralized and decentralized approaches to achieve both customer responsiveness and economies of scale.

    5. Hybrid Service Model: Product-Aligned Operating Model
    6. A model that supports what is commonly referred to as a matrix organization, organizing by highly related service categories and introducing the role of the service owner.

    7. Centralized: Plan-Build-Run
    8. A highly typical IT operating model that focuses on centralized strategic control and oversight in delivering cost-optimized and effective solutions.

    9. Centralized: Demand-Develop-Service
    10. A centralized IT operating model that lends well to more mature operating environments. Aimed at leveraging economies of scale in an end-to-end services delivery model.

    There are many different operating models. LoB/Product Aligned and Hybrid Functional align themselves most closely with how products and product families are typically delivered.

    Decentralized Model: Line of Business, Geographically, Product, or Functionally Aligned

    An example of a decentralized model is shown.

    BENEFITS

    DRAWBACKS

    • Organization around functions (FXN) allows for diversity in approach in how areas are run to best serve specific business units needs.
    • Each functional line exists largely independently, with full capacity and control to deliver service at the committed service level agreements.
    • Highly responsive to shifting needs and demands with direct connection to customers and all stages of the solution development lifecycle.
    • Accelerates decision making by delegating authority lower into the FXN.
    • Promotes a flatter organization with less hierarchy and more direct communication with the CIO.
    • Less synergy and integration across what different lines of business are doing can result in redundancies and unnecessary complexity.
    • Higher overall cost to the IT group due to role and technology duplication across different FXN.
    • Inexperience becomes an issue; requires more competent people to be distributed across the FXN.
    • Loss of sight of the big picture – difficult to enforce standards around people/process/technology with solution ownership within the FXN.

    For more information, see Redesign your IT Organizational Structure.

    Hybrid Model: Functional/Product Aligned

    An example of a hybrid model: functional/product aligned is shown.

    BENEFITS

    DRAWBACKS

    • Best of both worlds of centralization and decentralization; attempts to channel benefits from both centralized and decentralized models.
    • Embeds key IT functions that require business knowledge within functional areas, allowing for critical feedback.
    • Balances a holistic IT strategy and architecture with responsiveness to needs of the organization.
    • Achieves economies of scale where necessary through the delivery of shared services that can be requested by the function.
    • May result in excessive cost through role and system redundancies across different functions
    • Business units can have variable levels of IT competence; may result in different levels of effectiveness.
    • No guaranteed synergy and integration across functions; requires strong communication, collaboration, and steering.
    • Cannot meet every business unit’s needs – can cause tension from varying effectiveness of the IT functions placed within the functional areas.

    For more information, see Redesign your IT Organizational Structure.

    Hybrid Model: Product-Aligned Operating Model

    An example of a hybrid model: product-aligned operating model.

    BENEFITS

    DRAWBACKS

    • Focus is on the full lifecycle of a product – takes a strategic view of how technology enables the organization.
    • Promotes centralized backlog around a specific value creator, rather than traditional project focus, which is more transactional.
    • Dedicated teams around the product family ensure that you have all of the resources required to deliver on your product roadmap.
    • Reduces barriers between IT and business stakeholders, focuses on technology as a key strategic enabler.
    • Delivery is largely done through a DevOps methodology.
    • Significant business involvement is required for success within this model, with business stakeholders taking an active role in product governance and potentially product management as well.
    • Strong architecture standards and practices are required to make this successful because you need to ensure that product families are building in a consistent manner and limiting application sprawl.
    • Introduced the need for practice standards to drive consistency in quality of delivered services.
    • May result in increased cost through role redundancies across different squads.

    For more information, see Redesign your IT Organizational Structure.

    Centralized: Plan-Build-Run

    An example of a centralized: Plan-Build-Run is shown.

    BENEFITS

    DRAWBACKS

    • Effective at implementing long-term plans efficiently, separates maintenance and projects to allow each to have the appropriate focus.
    • More oversight over financials; better suited for fixed budgets.
    • Works across centralized technology domains to better align with the business's strategic objectives – allows for a top-down approach to decision making.
    • Allows for economies of scale and expertise pooling to improve IT’s efficiency.
    • Well suited for a project-driven environment that employs Waterfall or a hybrid project management methodology that is less iterative.
    • Not optimized for unpredictable/shifting project demands, as decision making is centralized in the plan function.
    • Less agility to deliver new features or solutions to the customer in comparison to decentralized models.
    • Build (developers) and run (operations staff) are far removed from the business, resulting in lower understanding of business needs (as well as “passing the buck” – from development to operations).
    • Requires strong hand-off processes to be defined and strong knowledge transfer from build to run functions in order to be successful.

    For more information, see Redesign your IT Organizational Structure.

    Centralized: Demand-Develop-Service

    An example of a centralized: Demand-Develop-Service model is shown.

    BENEFITS

    DRAWBACKS

    • Aligns well with an end-to-end services model; constant attention to customer demand and service supply.
    • Centralizes service operations under one functional area to serve shared needs across lines of business.
    • Allows for economies of scale and expertise pooling to improve IT’s efficiency.
    • Elevates sourcing and vendor management as its own strategic function; lends well to managed service and digital initiatives.
    • Development and operations housed together; lends well to DevOps-related initiatives.
    • Can be less responsive to business needs than decentralized models due to the need for portfolio steering to prioritize initiatives and solutions.
    • Requires a higher level of operational maturity to succeed; stable supply functions (service mgmt., operations mgmt., service desk, security, data) are critical to maintaining business satisfaction.
    • Requires highly effective governance around project portfolio, services, and integration capabilities.
    • Effective feedback loop highly dependent on accurate performance measures.

    For more information, see Redesign your IT Organizational Structure.

    Assess how your product scaling pattern impacts your resource delivery model

    Value Stream Alignment

    Enterprise Applications

    Shared Services

    Technical

    Plan-Build-Run:
    Centralized

    Pro: Supports established and stable families.

    Con: Command-and-control nature inhibits Agile DevOps and business agility.

    Pro: Supports established and stable families.

    Con: Command-and-control nature inhibits Agile DevOps and business agility.

    Pro: Can be used to align high-level families.

    Con: Lacks flexibility at the product level to address shifting priorities in product demand.

    Pro: Supports a factory model.

    Con: Lacks flexibility at the product level to address shifting priorities in product demand.

    Centralized Model 2:
    Demand-Develop-
    Service

    Pro: Supports established and stable families.

    Con: Command-and-control nature inhibits Agile DevOps and business agility.

    Pro: Supports established and stable families.

    Con: Command-and-control nature inhibits Agile DevOps and business agility.

    Pro: Recommended for aligning high-level service families based on user needs.

    Con: Reduces product empowerment, prioritizing demand. Slow.

    Pro: Supports factory models.

    Con: Reduces product empowerment, prioritizing demand. Slow.

    Decentralized Model:
    Line of Business, Product, Geographically, or

    Functionally Aligned

    Pro: Aligns product families to value streams, capabilities, and organizational structure.

    Con: Reduces shared solutions and may create duplicate apps and services.

    Pro: Enterprise apps treated as distinct LoB groups.

    Con: Reduces shared solutions and may create duplicate apps and services.

    Pro: Complements value stream alignment by consolidating shared apps and services.

    Con: Requires additional effort to differentiate local vs. shared solutions.

    Pro: Fits within other groupings where technical expertise is needed.

    Con: Creates redundancy between localized and shared technical teams.

    Hybrid Model:
    Functional/Product

    Aligned

    Pro: Supports multiple patterns of product grouping.

    Con: Requires additional effort to differentiate local vs. shared solutions.

    Pro: Supports multiple patterns of product grouping.

    Con: Requires additional effort to differentiate local vs. shared solutions.

    Pro: Supports multiple patterns of product grouping.

    Con: Requires additional effort to differentiate local vs. shared solutions.

    Pro: Supports multiple patterns of product grouping.

    Con: Creates redundancy between localized and shared technical teams.

    Hybrid Model:

    Product-Aligned Operating Model

    Pro: Supports multiple patterns of product grouping.

    Con: Requires additional effort to differentiate local vs. shared solutions.

    Pro: Supports multiple patterns of product grouping.

    Con: Requires additional effort to differentiate local vs. shared solutions.

    Pro: Supports multiple patterns of product grouping.

    Con: Requires additional effort to differentiate local vs. shared solutions.

    Pro: Supports multiple patterns of product grouping.

    Con: Creates redundancy between localized and shared technical teams.

    4.3.1 Understand the relationships between product management, delivery teams, and stakeholders

    30-60 minutes

    1. Discuss the intake sources of product work.
    2. Trace the flow of requests down to the functional roles of your delivery team (e.g., developer, QA, operations).
    3. Indicate where key deliverables are produced, particularly those that are built in collaboration.
    4. Discuss the five operating models relative to your current operating model choice. How aligned are you?
    5. Review Info-Tech’s recommendation on the best-aligned operating models for product family delivery. Do you agree or disagree?
    6. Evaluate recommendations against how you operate/work.

    Output

    • Understanding of the relationships between key groups
    • A preferred operating model

    Participants

    • Product owners
    • Product managers
    • Delivery managers

    Record the results in the Digital Product Family Strategy Playbook.

    4.3.1 Understand the relationships between product management, delivery teams, and stakeholders

    An example of activity 4.3.1 to understand the relationships between product management, delivery teams, and stakeholders is shown.

    Output

    • Understanding of the relationships between key groups
    • A preferred operating model

    Participants

    • Product owners
    • Product managers
    • Delivery managers

    Step 4.4

    Identify how to fund product family delivery

    Activities

    4.4.1 Discuss traditional vs. product-centric funding methods

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Product owners
    • Product managers
    • Portfolio managers
    • Delivery managers

    Outcomes of this step

    • An understanding of the differences between product-based and traditional funding methods

    Why is funding so problematic?

    We often still think about funding products like construction projects.

    Three models are shown on the various options to fund projects.

    These models require increasing accuracy throughout the project lifecycle to manage actuals vs. estimates.

    "Most IT funding depends on one-time expenditures or capital-funding mechanisms that are based on building-construction funding models predicated on a life expectancy of 20 years or more. Such models don’t provide the stability or flexibility needed for modern IT investments." – EDUCAUSE

    Reminder: Projects don’t go away. The center of the conversation changes.

    A flowchart is shown to demonstrate the difference between project lifecycle, hybrid lifecycle, and product lifecycle.

    Projects within products

    Regardless of whether you recognize yourself as a product-based or project-based shop, the same basic principles should apply.

    The purpose of projects is to deliver the scope of a product release. The shift to product delivery leverages a product roadmap and backlog as the mechanism for defining and managing the scope of the release.

    Eventually, teams progress to continuous integration/continuous delivery (CI/CD) where they can release on demand or as scheduled, requiring org change management.

    Planning and budgeting for products and families

    Reward for delivering outcomes, not features

    AutonomyFlexibilityAccountability
    Fund what delivers valueAllocate iterativelyMeasure and adjust

    Fund long-lived delivery of value through products (not projects).

    Give autonomy to the team to decide exactly what to build.

    Allocate to a pool based on higher-level business case.

    Provide funds in smaller amounts to different product teams and initiatives based on need.

    Product teams define metrics that contribute to given outcomes.

    Track progress and allocate more (or less) funds as appropriate.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Changes to funding require changes to product and Agile practices to ensure product ownership and accountability.

    The Lean Enterprise Funding Model is an example of a different approach

    An example of the lean enterprise funding model is shown.
    From: Implement Agile Practices That Work

    A flexible funding pool akin to venture capital models is maintained to support innovative ideas and fund proofs of concept for product and process improvements.

    Proofs of concept (POCs) are run by standing innovation teams or a reserve of resources not committed to existing products, projects, or services.

    Every product line has funding for all changes and ongoing operations and support.

    Teams are funded continuously so that they can learn and improve their practices as much as possible.

    Budgeting approaches must evolve as you mature your product operating environment

    TRADITIONAL PROJECTS WITH WATERFALL DELIVERY

    TRADITIONAL PROJECTS WITH AGILE DELIVERY

    PRODUCTS WITH AGILE PROJECT DELIVERY

    PRODUCTS WITH AGILE DELIVERY

    WHEN IS THE BUDGET TRACKED?

    Budget tracked by major phases

    Budget tracked by sprint and project

    Budget tracked by sprint and project

    Budget tracked by sprint and release

    HOW ARE CHANGES HANDLED?

    All change is by exception

    Scope change is routine, budget change is by exception

    Scope change is routine, budget change is by exception

    Budget change is expected on roadmap cadence

    WHEN ARE BENEFITS REALIZED?

    Benefits realization after project completion

    Benefits realization is ongoing throughout the life of the project

    Benefits realization is ongoing throughout the life of the product

    Benefits realization is ongoing throughout life of the product

    WHO “DRIVES”?

    Project Manager

    • Project team delivery role
    • Refines project scope, advocates for changes in the budget
    • Advocates for additional funding in the forecast

    Product Owner

    • Project team delivery role
    • Refines project scope, advocates for changes in the budget
    • Advocates for additional funding in the forecast

    Product Manager

    • Product portfolio team role
    • Forecasting new initiatives during delivery to continue to drive value throughout the life of the product

    Product Manager

  • Product family team role
  • Forecasting new initiatives during delivery to continue to drive value throughout the life of the product
  • Info-Tech Insight

    As you evolve your approach to product delivery, you will be decoupling the expected benefits, forecast, and budget. Managing them independently will improve your ability to adapt to change and drive the right outcomes!

    Your strategy must include the cost to build and operate

    Most investment happens after go-live, not in the initial build!

    An example strategy is displayed that incorporates the concepts of cost to build and operate.

    Adapted from: LookFar

    Info-Tech Insight

    While the exact balance point between development or implementation costs varies from application to application, over 80% of the cost is accrued after go-live.

    Traditional accounting leaves software development CapEx on the table

    Software development costs have traditionally been capitalized, while research and operations are operational expenditures.

    The challenge has always been the myth that operations are only bug fixes, upgrades, and other operational expenditures. Research shows that most post-release work on developed solutions is the development of new features and changes to support material changes in the business. While projects could bundle some of these changes into capital expenditure, much of the business-as-usual work that goes on leaves capital expenses on the table because the work is lumped together as maintenance-related OpEx.

    From “How to Stop Leaving Software CapEx on the Table With Agile and DevOps”

    4.4.1 Discuss traditional vs. product-centric funding methods

    30-60 minutes

    1. Discuss how products and product families are currently funded.
    2. Review how the Agile/product funding models differ from how you currently operate.
    3. What changes do you need to consider in order to support a product delivery model?
    4. For each change, identify the key stakeholders and list at least one action to take.
    5. Record the results in the Digital Product Family Strategy Playbook.

    Output

    • Understanding of funding principles and challenges

    Participants

    • Product owners
    • Product managers
    • Delivery managers

    Record the results in the Digital Product Family Strategy Playbook.

    Phase 5

    Build Your Transformation Roadmap and Communication Plan

    Phase 1Phase 2Phase 3Phase 4Phase 5

    1.1 Understand the organizational factors driving product-centric delivery

    1.2 Establish your organization’s product inventory

    2.1 Determine your approach to scale product families

    2.2 Define your product families

    3.1 Leverage product family roadmaps

    3.2 Use stakeholder management to improve roadmap communication

    3.3 Configure your product family roadmaps

    3.4 Confirm product family to product alignment

    4.1 Assess your organization’s delivery readiness

    4.2 Understand your delivery options

    4.3 Determine your operating model

    4.4 Identify how to fund product family delivery

    5.1 Learn how to introduce your digital product family strategy

    5.2 Communicate changes on updates to your strategy

    5.3 Determine your next steps

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    5.1.1 Introduce your digital product family strategy

    5.2.1 Define your communication cadence for your strategy updates

    5.2.2 Define your messaging for each stakeholder

    5.3.1 How do we get started?

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • Product owners
    • Product managers
    • Application leaders
    • Stakeholders

    Step 5.1

    Introduce your digital product family strategy

    Activities

    5.1.1 Introduce your digital product family strategy

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Product owners and product managers
    • Application leaders
    • Stakeholders

    Outcomes of this step

    • A completed executive summary presenting your digital product strategy

    Product decisions are traditionally made in silos with little to no cross-functional communication and strategic oversight

    Software delivery teams and stakeholders traditionally make plans, strategies, and releases within their silos and tailor their decisions based on their own priorities. Interactions are typically limited to hand-offs (such as feature requests) and routing of issues and defects back up the delivery pipeline. These silos likely came about through well-intentioned training, mandates, and processes, but they do not sufficiently support today’s need to rapidly release and change platforms.

    Siloed departments often have poor visibility into the activities of other silos, and they may not be aware of the ramifications their decisions have on teams and stakeholders outside of their silo.

    • Silos may make choices that are optimal largely for themselves without thinking of the holistic impact on a platform’s structure, strategy, use cases, and delivery.
    • The business may approve platform improvements without the consideration of the delivery team’s current capacity or the system’s complexity, resulting in unrealistic commitments.
    • Quality standards may be misinterpreted and inconsistently enforced across the entire delivery pipeline.

    In some cases, the only way to achieve greater visibility and communication for all roles across a platform’s lifecycle is implementing an overarching role or team.

    “The majority of our candid conversations with practitioners and project management offices indicate that the platform ownership role is poorly defined and poorly executed.”

    – Barry Cousins

    Practice Lead, Applications – Project & Portfolio Management

    Info-Tech Research Group

    Use stakeholder management and roadmap views to improve communication

    Proactive, clear communication with stakeholders, SMEs, and your product delivery team can significantly improve alignment and agreement with your roadmap, strategy, and vision.

    When building your communication strategy, revisit the work you completed in phase 3 developing your:

    • Roadmap types
    • Stakeholder strategy

    Type

    Quadrant

    Actions

    Players

    High influence, high interest – actively engage

    Keep them updated on the progress of the project. Continuously involve Players in the process and maintain their engagement and interest by demonstrating their value to its success.

    Mediators

    High influence, low interest – keep satisfied

    They can be the game changers in groups of stakeholders. Turn them into supporters by gaining their confidence and trust and including them in important decision-making steps. In turn, they can help you influence other stakeholders.

    Noisemakers

    Low influence, high interest – keep informed

    Try to increase their influence (or decrease it if they are detractors) by providing them with key information, supporting them in meetings, and using Mediators to help them.

    Spectators

    Low influence, low interest – monitor

    They are followers. Keep them in the loop by providing clarity on objectives and status updates.

    5.1.1 Introduce your digital product family strategy

    30-60 minutes

    This exercise is intended to help you lay out the framing of your strategy and the justification for the effort. A lot of these items can be pulled directly from the product canvas you created in phase 2. This is intended to be a single slide to frame your upcoming discussions.

    1. Update your vision, goals, and values on your product canvas. Determine which stakeholders may be impacted and what their concerns are. If you have many stakeholders, limit to Players and Influencers.
    2. Identify what you need from the stakeholders as a result of this communication.
    3. Keeping in mind the information gathered in steps 1 and 2, describe your product family strategy by answering three questions:
    1. Why do we need product families?
    2. What is in our way?
    3. Our first step will be... ?

    Output

    • An executive summary that introduces your product strategy

    Participants

    • Product owners and product managers
    • Application leaders
    • Stakeholders

    Record the results in the Digital Product Family Strategy Playbook.

    Example: Scaling delivery through product families

    Why do we need product families?

    • The growth of our product offerings and our company’s movement into new areas of growth mean we need to do a better job scaling our offerings to meet the needs of the organization.

    What is in our way?

    • Our existing applications and services are so dramatically different we are unsure how to bring them together.

    Our first step will be...

    • Taking a full inventory of our applications and services.

    Step 5.2

    Communicate changes on updates to your strategy

    Activities

    5.2.1 Define your communication cadence for your strategy updates

    5.2.2 Define your messaging for each stakeholder

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Product owners and product managers
    • Application leaders
    • Stakeholders

    Outcomes of this step

    • A communication plan for when strategy updates need to be given

    5.2.1 Define your communication cadence for your strategy updates

    30 minutes

    Remember the role of different artifacts when it comes to your strategy. The canvas contributes to the What, and the roadmap addresses the How. Any updates to the strategy are articulated and communicated through your roadmap.

    1. Review your currently defined roadmaps, their communication objectives, update frequency, and updates.
    2. Consider the impacted stakeholders and the strategies required to communicate with them.
    3. Fill in your communication cadence and communication method.

    EXAMPLE:

    Roadmap Name

    Audience/Stakeholders

    Communication Cadence

    External Customer Roadmap

    Customers and External Users

    Quarterly (Website)

    Product Delivery Roadmap

    Development Teams, Infrastructure, Architects

    Monthly (By Email)

    Technology Roadmap

    Development Teams, Infrastructure, Architects

    Biweekly (Website)

    Output

    • Clear communication cadence for your roadmaps

    Participants

    • Product owners and product managers
    • Application leaders
    • Stakeholders

    Record the results in the Digital Product Family Strategy Playbook.

    The “what” behind the communication

    Leaders of successful change spend considerable time developing a powerful change message, i.e. a compelling narrative that articulates the desired end state and makes the change concrete and meaningful to staff.

    The change message should:

    • Explain why the change is needed.
    • Summarize what will stay the same.
    • Highlight what will be left behind.
    • Emphasize what is being changed.
    • Explain how change will be implemented.
    • Address how change will affect various roles in the organization.
    • Discuss the staff’s role in making the change successful.

    Five elements of communicating change

    1. What is the change?
    2. Why are we doing it?
    3. How are we going to go about it?
    4. How long will it take us to do it?
    5. What is the role for each department and individual?

    Source: Cornelius & Associates

    How we engage with the message is just as important as the message itself

    Why are we here?

    Speak to what matters to them

    Sell the improvement

    Show real value

    Discuss potential fears

    Ask for their support

    Be gracious

    5.2.2 (Optional) Define your messaging for each stakeholder

    30 minutes

    It’s one thing to communicate the strategy, it’s another thing to send the right message to your stakeholders. Some of this will depend on the kind of news given, but the majority of this is dependent on the stakeholder and the cadence of communication.

    1. From exercise 5.2.1, take the information on the specific roadmaps, target audience, and communication cadence.
    2. Based on your understanding of the audience’s needs, what would the specific update try to get across?
    3. Pick a specific typical example of a change in strategy that you have gone through. (e.g. Product will be delayed by a quarter; key feature is being substituted for another.)

    EXAMPLE:

    Roadmap Name

    Audience/ Stakeholder

    Communication Cadence

    Messaging

    External Customer Roadmap

    Customers and External Users

    Quarterly (Website)

    Output

    • Messaging plan for each roadmap type

    Participants

    • Product owners and product managers
    • Application leaders
    • Stakeholders

    Record the results in the Digital Product Family Strategy Playbook.

    Step 5.3

    Determine your next steps

    Activities

    5.3.1 How do we get started?

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Product owners and product managers
    • Application leaders
    • Stakeholders

    Outcomes of this step

    • Understanding the steps to get started in your transformation

    Make a plan in order to make a plan!

    Consider some of the techniques you can use to validate your strategy.

    Learning Milestones

    Sprint Zero (AKA Project-before-the-project)

    The completion of a set of artifacts dedicated to validating business opportunities and hypotheses.

    Possible areas of focus:

    Align teams on product strategy prior to build

    Market research and analysis

    Dedicated feedback sessions

    Provide information on feature requirements

    The completion of a set of key planning activities, typically the first sprint.

    Possible areas of focus:

    Focus on technical verification to enable product development alignment

    Sign off on architectural questions or concerns

    An image showing the flowchart of continuous delivery of value is shown.

    Go to your backlog and prioritize the elements that need to be answered sooner rather than later.

    Possible areas of focus:

    Regulatory requirements or questions to answer around accessibility, security, privacy.

    Stress testing any new processes against situations that may occur.

    The “Now, Next, Later” roadmap

    Use this when deadlines and delivery dates are not strict. This is best suited for brainstorming a product plan when dependency mapping is not required.

    Now: What are you going to do now?

    Next: What are you going to do very soon?

    Later: What are you going to do in the future?

    An example of a now, next, later roadmap is shown.

    Source: “Tips for Agile product roadmaps & product roadmap examples,” Scrum.org, 2017

    5.3.1 How do we get started?

    30-60 minutes

    1. Identify what the critical steps are for the organization to embrace product-centric delivery.
    2. Group each critical step by how soon you need to address it:
    • Now: Let’s do this ASAP.
    • Next: Sometime very soon, let’s do these things.
    • Later: Much further off in the distance, let’s consider these things.
  • Record the group results in the Deliver Digital Products at Scale Workbook.
  • Record changes for your product and product family in the Digital Product Family Strategy Playbook.
  • An example of a now, next, later roadmap is shown.

    Source: “Tips for Agile product roadmaps & product roadmap examples,” Scrum.org, 2017

    Output

    • Product family transformation critical steps and basic roadmap

    Participants

    • Product owners and product managers
    • Application leaders
    • Stakeholders

    Record the results in the Digital Product Family Strategy Playbook.

    Record the results in the Deliver Digital Products at Scale Workbook.

    Summary of Accomplishment

    Problem Solved

    The journey to become a product-centric organization is not short or easy. Like with any improvement or innovation, teams need to continue to evolve and mature with changes in their operations, teams, tools, and user needs.You’ve taken a big step completing your product family alignment. This provides a backbone for aligning all aspects of your organization to your enterprise goals and strategy while empowering product teams to find solutions closer to the problem. Continue to refine your model and operations to improve value realization and your product delivery pipelines to embrace business agility. Organizations that are most responsive to change will continue to outperform command-and-control leadership.

    If you would like additional support, have our analysts guide you through other phases as part of an Info-Tech workshop.

    Contact your account representative for more information.

    workshops@infotech.com

    1-888-670-8889

    Research Contributors and Experts

    Photo of Emily Archer.

    Emily Archer

    Lead Business Analyst,

    Enterprise Consulting, authentic digital agency

    Emily Archer is a consultant currently working with Fortune 500 clients to ensure the delivery of successful projects, products, and processes. She helps increase the business value returned for organizations’ investments in designing and implementing enterprise content hubs and content operations, custom web applications, digital marketing, and e-commerce platforms.

    Photo of David Berg

    Founder & CTO

    Strainprint Technologies Inc.

    David Berg is a product commercialization expert that has spent the last 20 years of his career delivering product management and business development services across a broad range of industries. Early in his career, David worked with product management and engineering teams to build core network infrastructure products that secure and power the internet we benefit from today. David’s experience also includes working with clean technologies in the area of clean power generation, agritech, and Internet of Things infrastructure. Over the last five years, David has been focused on his latest venture, Strainprint Technologies, a data and analytics company focused on the medical cannabis industry. Strainprint has built the largest longitudinal medical cannabis dataset in the world with the goal to develop an understanding of treatment behavior, interactions, and chemical drivers to guide future product development.

    Kathy Borneman

    Digital Product Owner, SunTrust Bank

    Kathy Borneman is a senior product owner who helps people enjoy their jobs again by engaging others in end-to-end decision making to deliver software and operational solutions that enhance the client experience and allow people to think and act strategically.

    Photro of Charlie Campbell

    Charlie Campbell

    Product Owner, Merchant e-Solutions

    Charlie Campbell is an experienced problem solver with the ability to quickly dissect situations and recommend immediate actions to achieve resolution, liaise between technical and functional personnel to bridge the technology and communication gap, and work with diverse teams and resources to reach a common goal.

    Photo of Yarrow Diamond

    Yarrow Diamond

    Sr. Director, Business Architecture

    Financial Services

    Yarrow Diamond is an experienced professional with expertise in enterprise strategy development, project portfolio management, and business process reengineering across financial services, healthcare and insurance, hospitality, and real estate environments. She has a master’s in Enterprise Architecture from Penn State University, LSSMBB, PMP, CSM, ITILv3.

    Photo of Cari J. Faanes-Blakey

    Cari J. Faanes-Blakey, CBAP, PMI-PBA

    Enterprise Business Systems Analyst,

    Vertex, Inc.

    Cari J. Faanes-Blakey has a history in software development and implementation as a Business Analyst and Project Manager for financial and taxation software vendors. Active in the International Institute of Business Analysis (IIBA), Cari participated on the writing team for the BA Body of Knowledge 3.0 and the certification exam.

    Photo of Kieran Gobey

    Kieran Gobey

    Senior Consultant Professional Services

    Blueprint Software Systems

    Kieran Gobey is an IT professional with 24 years of experience, focused on business, technology, and systems analysis. He has split his career between external and internal customer-facing roles, and this has resulted in a true understanding of what is required to be a Professional Services Consultant. His problem-solving skills and ability to mentor others have resulted in successful software implementations. Kieran’s specialties include deep system troubleshooting and analysis skills, facilitating communications to bring together participants effectively, mentoring, leadership, and organizational skills.

    Photo of Rupert Kainzbauer

    Rupert Kainzbauer

    VP Product, Digital Wallets

    Paysafe Group

    Rupert Kainzbauer is an experienced senior leader with a passion for defining and delivering products that deliver real customer and commercial benefit. Together with a team of highly experienced and motivated product managers, he has successfully led highly complex, multi-stakeholder payments initiatives, from proposition development and solution design through to market delivery. Their domain experience is in building online payment products in high-risk and emerging markets, remittance, prepaid cards, and mobile applications.

    Photo of Saeed Khan

    Saeed Khan

    Founder,

    Transformation Labs

    Saeed Khan has been working in high tech for 30 years in both Canada and the US and has held a number of leadership roles in Product Management over that time. He speaks regularly at conferences and has been writing publicly about technology product management since 2005. Through Transformation Labs, Saeed helps companies accelerate product success by working with product teams to improve their skills, practices, and processes. He is a cofounder of ProductCamp Toronto and currently runs a Meetup group and global Slack community called Product Leaders; the only global community of senior level product executives.

    Photo of Hoi Kun Lo

    Hoi Kun Lo

    Product Owner

    Nielsen

    Hoi Kun Lo is an experienced change agent who can be found actively participating within the IIBA and WITI groups in Tampa, FL and a champion for Agile, architecture, diversity, and inclusion programs at Nielsen. She is currently a Product Owner in the Digital Strategy team within Nielsen Global Watch Technology.

    Photo of Abhishek Mathur

    Abhishek Mathur

    Sr Director, Product Management

    Kasisto, Inc.

    Abhishek Mathur is a product management leader, an artificial intelligence practitioner, and an educator. He has led product management and engineering teams at Clarifai, IBM, and Kasisto to build a variety of artificial intelligence applications within the space of computer vision, natural language processing, and recommendation systems. Abhishek enjoys having deep conversations about the future of technology and helping aspiring product managers enter and accelerate their careers.

    Photo of Jeff Meister

    Jeff Meister

    Technology Advisor and Product Leader

    Jeff Meister is a technology advisor and product leader. He has more than 20 years of experience building and operating software products and the teams that build them. He has built products across a wide range of industries and has built and led large engineering, design, and product organizations. Jeff most recently served as Senior Director of Product Management at Avanade, where he built and led the product management practice. This involved hiring and leading product managers, defining product management processes, solution shaping and engagement execution, and evangelizing the discipline through pitches, presentations, and speaking engagements. Jeff holds a Bachelor’s of Applied Science (Electrical Engineering) and a Bachelor’s of Arts from the University of Waterloo, an MBA from INSEAD (Strategy), and certifications in product management, project management, and design thinking.

    Photo of Vincent Mirabelli

    Vincent Mirabelli

    Principal,

    Global Project Synergy Group

    With over 10 years of experience in both the private and public sectors, Vincent Mirabelli possesses an impressive track record of improving, informing, and transforming business strategy and operations through process improvement, design and re-engineering, and the application of quality to business analysis, project management, and process improvement standards.

    Photo of Oz Nazili

    Oz Nazili

    VP, Product & Growth

    TWG

    Oz Nazili is a product leader with a decade of experience in both building products and product teams. Having spent time at funded startups and large enterprises, he thinks often about the most effective way to deliver value to users. His core areas of interest include Lean MVP development and data-driven product growth.

    Photo of Mark Pearson

    Mark Pearson

    Principal IT Architect, First Data Corporation

    Mark Pearson is an executive business leader grounded in the process, data, technology, and operations of software-driven business. He knows the enterprise software landscape and is skilled in product, technology, and operations design and delivery within information technology organizations, outsourcing firms, and software product companies.

    Photo of Brenda Peshak

    Brenda Peshak

    Product Owner,

    Widget Industries, LLC

    Brenda Peshak is skilled in business process, analytical skills, Microsoft Office Suite, communication, and customer relationship management (CRM). She is a strong product management professional with a Master’s focused in Business Leadership (MBL) from William Penn University.

    Photo of Mike Starkey

    Mike Starkey

    Director of Engineering

    W.W. Grainger

    Mike Starkey is a Director of Engineering at W.W. Grainger, currently focusing on operating model development, digital architecture, and building enterprise software. Prior to joining W.W. Grainger, Mike held a variety of technology consulting roles throughout the system delivery lifecycle spanning multiple industries such as healthcare, retail, manufacturing, and utilities with Fortune 500 companies.

    Photo of Anant Tailor

    Anant Tailor

    Cofounder & Head of Product

    Dream Payments Corp.

    Anant Tailor is a cofounder at Dream Payments where he currently serves as the COO and Head of Product, having responsibility for Product Strategy & Development, Client Delivery, Compliance, and Operations. He has 20+ years of experience building and operating organizations that deliver software products and solutions for consumers and businesses of varying sizes. Prior to founding Dream Payments, Anant was the COO and Director of Client Services at DonRiver Inc, a technology strategy and software consultancy that he helped to build and scale into a global company with 100+ employees operating in seven countries. Anant is a Professional Engineer with a Bachelor’s degree in Electrical Engineering from McMaster University and a certificate in Product Strategy & Management from the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University.

    Photo of Angela Weller

    Angela Weller

    Scrum Master, Businessolver

    Angela Weller is an experienced Agile business analyst who collaborates with key stakeholders to attain their goals and contributes to the achievement of the company’s strategic objectives to ensure a competitive advantage. She excels when mediating or facilitating teams.

    Related Info-Tech Research

    Product Delivery

    Deliver on Your Digital Product Vision

    • Build a product vision your organization can take from strategy through execution.

    Build a Better Product Owner

    • Strengthen the product owner role in your organization by focusing on core capabilities and proper alignment.

    Build Your Agile Acceleration Roadmap

    • Quickly assess the state of your Agile readiness and plan your path forward to higher value realization.

    Implement Agile Practices That Work

    • Improve collaboration and transparency with the business to minimize project failure.

    Implement DevOps Practices That Work

    • Streamline business value delivery through the strategic adoption of DevOps practices.

    Extend Agile Practices Beyond IT

    • Further the benefits of Agile by extending a scaled Agile framework to the business.

    Build Your BizDevOps Playbook

    • Embrace a team sport culture built around continuous business-IT collaboration to deliver great products.

    Embed Security Into the DevOps Pipeline

    • Shift security left to get into DevSecOps.

    Spread Best Practices With an Agile Center of Excellence

    • Facilitate ongoing alignment between Agile teams and the business with a set of targeted service offerings.

    Enable Organization-Wide Collaboration by Scaling Agile

    • Execute a disciplined approach to rolling out Agile methods in the organization.

    Application Portfolio Management

    APM Research Center

    • See an overview of the APM journey and how we can support the pieces in this journey.

    Application Portfolio Management for Small Enterprises

    • There is no one-size-fits-all rationalization. Tailor your framework to meet your goals.

    Streamline Application Maintenance

    • Effective maintenance ensures the long-term value of your applications.

    Build an Application Rationalization Framework

    • Manage your application portfolio to minimize risk and maximize value.

    Modernize Your Applications

    • Justify modernizing your application portfolio from both business and technical perspectives.

    Review Your Application Strategy

    • Ensure your applications enable your business strategy.

    Discover Your Applications

    • Most application strategies fail. Arm yourself with the necessary information and team structure for a successful application portfolio strategy.

    Streamline Application Management

    • Move beyond maintenance to ensuring exceptional value from your apps.

    Optimize Applications Release Management

    • Facilitate ongoing alignment between Agile teams and the business with a set of targeted service offerings.

    Embrace Business-Managed Applications

    • Empower the business to implement their own applications with a trusted business-IT relationship.

    Value, Delivery Metrics, Estimation

    Build a Value Measurement Framework

    • Focus product delivery on business value–driven outcomes.

    Select and Use SDLC Metrics Effectively

    • Be careful what you ask for, because you will probably get it.

    Application Portfolio Assessment: End User Feedback

    • Develop data-driven insights to help you decide which applications to retire, upgrade, re-train on, or maintain to meet the demands of the business.

    Create a Holistic IT Dashboard

    • Mature your IT department by measuring what matters.

    Refine Your Estimation Practices With Top-Down Allocations

    • Don’t let bad estimates ruin good work.

    Estimate Software Delivery With Confidence

    • Commit to achievable software releases by grounding realistic expectations.

    Reduce Time to Consensus With an Accelerated Business Case

    • Expand on the financial model to give your initiative momentum.

    Optimize Project Intake, Approval, and Prioritization

    • Deliver more projects by giving yourself the voice to say “no” or “not yet” to new projects.

    Enhance PPM Dashboards and Reports

    • Facilitate ongoing alignment between Agile teams and the business with a set of targeted service offerings.

    Org Design and Performance

    Redesign Your IT Organizational Structure

    • Focus product delivery on business value–driven outcomes.

    Build a Strategic Workforce Plan

    • Have the right people, in the right place, at the right time.

    Implement a New Organizational Structure

    • Reorganizations are inherently disruptive. Implement your new structure with minimal pain for staff while maintaining IT performance throughout the change.

    Improve Employee Engagement to Drive IT Performance

    • Don’t just measure engagement, act on it.

    Set Meaningful Employee Performance Measures

    • Set holistic measures to inspire employee performance.

    Master Organizational Change Management Practices

    • PMOs, if you don't know who is responsible for org change, it's you.

    Bibliography (Product Management)

    “12th Annual State of Agile Report.” VersionOne, 9 April 2018. Web.

    A, Karen. “20 Mental Models for Product Managers.” Product Management Insider, Medium, 2 Aug. 2018. Web.

    Adams, Paul. “Product Teams: How to Build & Structure Product Teams for Growth.” Inside Intercom, 30 Oct. 2019. Web.

    Agile Alliance. “Product Owner.” Agile Alliance. n.d. Web.

    Ambysoft. “2018 IT Project Success Rates Survey Results.” Ambysoft. 2018. Web.

    Banfield, Richard, et al. “On-Demand Webinar: Strategies for Scaling Your (Growing) Enterprise Product Team.” Pluralsight, 31 Jan. 2018. Web.

    Berez, Steve, et al. “How to Plan and budget for Agile at Scale.” Bain & Company, 08 Oct 2019. Web

    Blueprint. “10 Ways Requirements Can Sabotage Your Projects Right From the Start.” Blueprint. 2012. Web.

    Breddels, Dajo, and Paul Kuijten. “Product Owner Value Game.” Agile2015 Conference, Agile Alliance 2015. Web.

    Cagan, Martin. “Behind Every Great Product.” Silicon Valley Product Group. 2005. Web.

    Cohn, Mike. “What Is a Product?” Mountain Goat Software. 6 Sept. 2016. Web.

    Connellan, Thomas K. Inside the Magic Kingdom, Bard Press, 1997.

    Curphey, Mark. “Product Definition.” SlideShare, 25 Feb. 2007. Web.

    “Delegation Poker Product Image.” Management 3.0, n.d. Web.

    Distel, Dominic, et al. “Finding the sweet spot in product-portfolio management.’ McKinsey, 4 Dec. 2020. Web

    Eringa, Ron. “Evolution of the Product Owner.” RonEringa.com, 12 June 2016. Web.

    Fernandes, Thaisa. “Spotify Squad Framework - Part I.” PM101, Medium, 6 Mar. 2017. Web.

    Galen, Robert. “Measuring Product Ownership – What Does ‘Good’ Look Like?” RGalen Consulting, 5 Aug. 2015. Web.

    Halisky, Merland, and Luke Lackrone. “The Product Owner’s Universe.” Agile2016 Conference, Agile Alliance, 2016. Web.

    Kamer, Jurriaan. “How to Build Your Own ‘Spotify Model’.” The Ready, Medium, 9 Feb. 2018. Web.

    Kendis Team. “Exploring Key Elements of Spotify’s Agile Scaling Model.” Scaled Agile Framework, Medium, 23 Jul. 2018. Web.

    Lindstrom, Lowell. “7 Skills You Need to Be a Great Product Owner.” Scrum Alliance, n.d. Web.

    Lukassen, Chris. “The Five Belts Of The Product Owner.” Xebia.com, 20 Sept. 2016. Web.

    McCloskey, Heather. “Scaling Product Management: Secrets to Defeating Common Challenges.” ProductPlan, 12 July 2019. Web.

    McCloskey, Heather. “When and How to Scale Your Product Team.” UserVoice, 21 Feb. 2017. Web.

    Mironov, Rich. “Scaling Up Product Manager/Owner Teams.” Rich Mironov's Product Bytes, Mironov Consulting, 12 Apr. 2014 . Web.

    Overeem, Barry. “A Product Owner Self-Assessment.” Barry Overeem, 6 Mar. 2017. Web.

    Overeem, Barry. “Retrospective: Using the Team Radar.” Barry Overeem, 27 Feb. 2017. Web.

    Pichler, Roman. “How to Scale the Scrum Product Owner.” Roman Pichler, 28 June 2016 . Web.

    Pichler, Roman. “Product Management Framework.” Pichler Consulting Limited, 2014. Web.

    Pichler, Roman. “Sprint Planning Tips for Product Owners.” LinkedIn, 4 Sept. 2018. Web.

    Pichler, Roman. “What Is Product Management?” Pichler Consulting Limited, 26 Nov. 2014. Web.

    Radigan, Dan. “Putting the ‘Flow' Back in Workflow With WIP Limits.” Atlassian, n.d. Web.

    Rouse, Margaret. “Definition: product.” TechTarget, Sept. 2005. Web.

    Schuurman, Robbin. “10 Tips for Product Owners on (Business) Value.” Scrum.org, 30 Nov. 2017. Web.

    Schuurman, Robbin. “10 Tips for Product Owners on Agile Product Management.” Scrum.org, 28 Nov. 2017. Web.

    Schuurman, Robbin. “10 Tips for Product Owners on Product Backlog Management.” Scrum.org, 5 Dec. 2017. Web.

    Schuurman, Robbin. “10 Tips for Product Owners on the Product Vision.” Scrum.org, 29 Nov. 2017. Web.

    Schuurman, Robbin. “Tips for Starting Product Owners.” Scrum.org, 27 Nov. 2017. Web.

    Sharma, Rohit. “Scaling Product Teams the Structured Way.” Monetary Musings, 28 Nov. 2016. Web.

    Shirazi, Reza. “Betsy Stockdale of Seilevel: Product Managers Are Not Afraid To Be Wrong.” Austin Voice of Product, 2 Oct. 2018. Web.

    Steiner, Anne. “Start to Scale Your Product Management: Multiple Teams Working on Single Product.” Cprime, 6 Aug. 2019. Web.

    “The Qualities of Leadership: Leading Change.” Cornelius & Associates, 2016. Web.

    “The Standish Group 2015 Chaos Report.” The Standish Group. 2015. Web.

    Theus, Andre. “When Should You Scale the Product Management Team?” ProductPlan, 7 May 2019. Web.

    Tolonen, Arto. “Scaling Product Management in a Single Product Company.” Smartly.io, 26 Apr. 2018. Web.

    Ulrich, Catherine. “The 6 Types of Product Managers. Which One Do You Need?” Medium, 19 Dec. 2017. Web.

    Verwijs, Christiaan. “Retrospective: Do The Team Radar.” The Liberators, Medium, 10 Feb. 2017. Web.

    Vlaanderen, Kevin. “Towards Agile Product and Portfolio Management”. Academia.edu. 2010. Web.

    Bibliography (Roadmap)

    Bastow, Janna. “Creating Agile Product roadmaps Everyone Understands.” ProdPad, 22 Mar. 2017. Accessed Sept. 2018.

    Bastow, Janna. “The Product Tree Game: Our Favorite Way To Prioritize Features.” ProdPad, 21 Feb. 2016. Accessed Sept. 2018.

    Chernak, Yuri. “Requirements Reuse: The State of the Practice.” 2012 IEEE International Conference, 12 June 2012, Herzliya, Israel. Web.

    Fowler, Martin. “Application Boundary.” MartinFowler.com, 11 Sept. 2003. Accessed 20 Nov. 2017.

    Harrin, Elizabeth. “Learn What a Project Milestone Is.” The Balance Careers, 10 May 2018. Accessed Sept. 2018.

    “How to create a product roadmap.” Roadmunk, n.d. Accessed Sept. 2018.

    Johnson, Steve. “How to Master the 3 Horizons of Product Strategy.” Aha!, 24 Sept. 2015. Accessed Sept. 2018.

    Johnson, Steve. “The Product Roadmap vs. the Technology Roadmap.” Aha!, 23 June 2016. Accessed Sept. 2018

    Juncal, Shaun. “How Should You Set Your Product Roadmap Timeframes?” ProductPlan, Web. Sept. 2018.

    Leffingwell, Dean. “SAFe 4.0.” Scaled Agile, 2017. Web.

    Maurya, Ash. “What is a Minimum Viable Product (MVP).” Leanstack, 12 June 2017. Accessed Sept. 2018.

    Pichler, Roman. “10 Tips for Creating an Agile Product Roadmap.” Roman Pichler, 20 July 2016. Accessed Sept. 2018.

    Pichler, Roman. Strategize: Product Strategy and Product Roadmap Practices for the Digital Age. Pichler Consulting, 2016.

    “Product Roadmap Contents: What Should You Include?” ProductPlan, n.d. Accessed 20 Nov. 2017.

    Saez, Andrea. “Why Your Roadmap Is Not a Release Plan.” ProdPad, 23 October 2015. Accessed Sept. 2018.

    Schuurman, Robbin. “Tips for Agile product roadmaps & product roadmap examples.” Scrum.org, 7 Dec. 2017. Accessed Sept. 2018.

    Bibliography (Vision and Canvas)

    Adams, Paul. “The Future Product Canvas.” Inside Intercom, 10 Jan. 2014. Web.

    “Aligning IT Funding Models to the Pace of Technology Change.” EDUCAUSE, 14 Dec. 2015. Web.

    Altman, Igor. “Metrics: Gone Bad.” OpenView, 10 Nov. 2009. Web.

    Barry, Richard. “The Product Vision Canvas – a Strategic Tool in Developing a Successful Business.” Polymorph, 2019. Web.

    “Business Canvas – Business Models & Value Propositions.” Strategyzer, 2019. Web.

    “Business Model Canvas.” Wikipedia: The Free Encyclopedia, 4 Aug. 2019. Web.

    Charak, Dinker. “Idea to Product: The Working Model.” ThoughtWorks, 13 July 2017. Web.

    Charak, Dinker. “Product Management Canvas - Product in a Snapshot.” Dinker Charak, 29 May 2017. Web.

    Chudley, James. “Practical Steps in Determining Your Product Vision (Product Tank Bristol, Oct. 2018).” LinkedIn SlideShare. Uploaded by cxpartners, 2 Nov. 2018. Web.

    Cowan, Alex. “The 20 Minute Business Plan: Business Model Canvas Made Easy.” COWAN+, 2019. Web.

    Craig, Desiree. “So You've Decided To Become A Product Manager.” Start it up, Medium, 2 June 2019. Web.

    Create an Aha! Business Model Canvas Strategic Model.” Aha! Support, 2019. Web.

    Eick, Stephen. “Does Code Decay? Assessing the Evidence from Change Management Data.” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 27, no. 1, Jan. 2001, pp. 1-12. Web.

    Eriksson, Martin. “The next Product Canvas.” Mind the Product, 22 Nov. 2013. Web.

    “Experience Canvas: a Lean Approach: Atlassian Team Playbook.” Atlassian, 2019. Web.

    Freeman, James. “How to Make a Product Canvas – Visualize Your Product Plan.” Edraw, 23 Dec. 2019. Web.

    Fuchs, Danny. “Measure What Matters: 5 Best Practices from Performance Management Leaders.” OpenGov, 8 Aug. 2018. Web.

    Gorisse, Willem. “A Practical Guide to the Product Canvas.” Mendix, 28 Mar. 2017. Web.

    Gothelf, Jeff. “The Lean UX Canvas.” Jeff Gothelf, 15 Dec. 2016. Web.

    Gottesdiener, Ellen. “Using the Product Canvas to Define Your Product: Getting Started.” EBG Consulting, 15 Jan. 2019. Web.

    Gottesdiener, Ellen. “Using the Product Canvas to Define Your Product's Core Requirements.” EBG Consulting, 4 Feb. 2019. Web.

    Gray, Mark Krishan. “Should I Use the Business Model Canvas or the Lean Canvas?” Emergn, 2019. Web.

    Hanby, Jeff. "Software Maintenance: Understanding and Estimating Costs." LookFar, 21 Oct. 2016. Web.

    “How do you define a product?” Scrum.org, 4 Apr 2017, Web

    Juncal, Shaun. “How to Build a Product Roadmap Based on a Business Model Canvas.” ProductPlan, 19 June 2019. Web.

    “Lean Canvas Intro - Uber Example.” YouTube, uploaded by Railsware Product Academy, 12 Oct. 2018. Web.

    “Lesson 6: Product Canvas.” ProdPad Help Center, 2019. Web.

    Lucero, Mario. “The Product Canvas.” Agilelucero.com, 22 June 2015. Web.

    Maurya, Ash. “Create a New Lean Canvas.” Canvanizer, 2019. Web.

    Maurya, Ash. “Don't Write a Business Plan. Create a Lean Canvas Instead.” LEANSTACK, 2019. Web.

    Maurya, Ash. “Why Lean Canvas vs Business Model Canvas?” Medium, 27 Feb. 2012. Web.

    Mirabelli, Vincent. “The Project Value Canvas.” Vincent Mirabelli, 2019. Web.

    Mishra, LN. “Business Analysis Canvas – The Ultimate Enterprise Architecture.” BA Times, 19 June 2019. Web.

    Muller. Jerry Z. “Why performance metrics isn’t always the best way to judge performance.” Fast Company, 3 April 2019. Web.

    Perri, Melissa. “What Is Good Product Strategy?” Melissa Perri, 14 July 2016. Web.

    Pichler, Roman. “A Product Canvas for Agile Product Management, Lean UX, Lean Startup.” Roman Pichler, 16 July 2012. Web.

    Pichler, Roman. “Introducing the Product Canvas.” JAXenter, 15 Jan. 2013. Web.

    Pichler, Roman. “Roman's Product Canvas: Introduction.” YouTube, uploaded by Roman Pichler, 3 Mar. 2017. Web.

    Pichler, Roman. “The Agile Vision Board: Vision and Product Strategy.” Roman Pichler, 10 May 2011. Web.

    Pichler, Roman. “The Product Canvas – Template.” Roman Pichler, 11 Oct. 2016. Web.

    Pichler, Roman. “The Product Canvas Tutorial V1.0.” LinkedIn SlideShare. Uploaded by Roman Pichler, 14 Feb. 2013. Web.

    Pichler, Roman. “The Product Vision Board: Introduction.” YouTube uploaded by Roman Pichler, 3 Mar. 2017. Web.

    “Product Canvas PowerPoint Template.” SlideModel, 2019. Web.

    Product Canvas.” SketchBubble, 2019, Web.

    “Product Canvas.” YouTube, uploaded by Wojciech Szramowski, 18 May 2016. Web.

    “Product Roadmap Software to Help You Plan, Visualize, and Share Your Product Roadmap.” Productboard, 2019. Web.

    Roggero, Giulio. “Product Canvas Step-by-Step.” LinkedIn SlideShare, uploaded by Giulio Roggero, 18 May 2013. Web.

    Royce, Dr. Winston W. “Managing the Development of Large Software Systems.” Scf.usc.edu, 1970. Web.

    Ryan, Dustin. “The Product Canvas.” Qdivision, Medium, 20 June 2017. Web.

    Snow, Darryl. “Product Vision Board.” Medium, 6 May 2017. Web.

    Stanislav, Shymansky. “Lean Canvas – a Tool Your Startup Needs Instead of a Business Plan.” Railsware, 12 Oct. 2018. Web.

    Stanislav, Shymansky. “Lean Canvas Examples of Multi-Billion Startups.” Railsware, 20 Feb. 2019. Web.

    “The Product Vision Canvas.” YouTube, Uploaded by Tom Miskin, 20 May 2019. Web.

    Tranter, Leon. “Agile Metrics: the Ultimate Guide.” Extreme Uncertainty, n.d. Web.

    “Using Business Model Canvas to Launch a Technology Startup or Improve Established Operating Model.” AltexSoft, 27 July 2018. Web.

    Veyrat, Pierre. “Lean Business Model Canvas: Examples + 3 Pillars + MVP + Agile.” HEFLO BPM, 10 Mar. 2017. Web.

    “What Are Software Metrics and How Can You Track Them?” Stackify, 16 Sept. 2017. Web

    “What Is a Product Vision?” Aha!, 2019. Web.

    Annual CIO Survey Report 2024

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}106|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Innovation
    • Parent Category Link: /innovation

    CIOs today face increasing pressures, disruptive emerging technologies, talent shortages, and a slew of other challenges. What are their top concerns, priorities, and technology bets that will define the future direction of IT?

    CIO responses to our Future of IT 2024 survey reveal key insights on spending projects, the potential disruptions causing the most concern, plans for adopting emerging technology, and how firms are responding to generative AI.

    See how CIOs are sizing up the opportunities and threats of the year ahead

    Map your organization’s response to the external environment compared to CIOs across geographies and industries. Learn:

    • The CIO view on continuing concerns such as cybersecurity.
    • Where they rate their IT department’s maturity.
    • What their biggest concerns and budget increases are.
    • How they’re approaching third-party generative AI tools.

    Annual CIO Survey Report 2024 Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Future of IT Survey 2024 – A summary of key insights from the CIO responses to our Future of IT 2024 survey.

    Take the pulse of the IT industry and see how CIOs are planning to approach 2024.

    • Annual CIO Survey Report for 2024
    [infographic]

    Further reading

    Annual CIO Survey Report 2024

    An inaugural look at what's on the minds of CIOs.

    1. Firmographics

    • Region
    • Title
    • Organization Size
    • IT Budget Size
    • Industry

    Firmographics

    The majority of CIO responses came from North America. Contributors represent regions from around the world.

    Countries / Regions Response %
    United States 47.18%
    Canada 11.86%
    Australia 9.60%
    Africa 6.50%
    China 0.28%
    Germany 1.13%
    United Kingdom 5.37%
    India 1.41%
    Brazil 1.98%
    Mexico 0.56%
    Middle East 4.80%
    Asia 0.28%
    Other country in Europe 4.52%

    n=354

    Firmographics

    A typical CIO respondent held a C-level position at a small to mid-sized organization.

    Half of CIOs hold a C-level position, 10% are VP-level, and 20% are director level

    Pie Chart of CIO positions

    38% of respondents are from an organization with above 1,000 employees

    Pie chart of size of organizations

    Firmographics

    A typical CIO respondent held a C-level position at a small to mid-sized organization.

    40% of CIOs report an annual budget of more than $10 million

    Pie chart of CIO annual budget

    A range of industries are represented, with 29% of respondents in the public sector or financial services

    Range of industries

    2. Key Factors

    • IT Maturity
    • Disruptive Factors
    • IT Spending Plans
    • Talent Shortage

    Two in three respondents say IT can deliver outcomes that Support or Optimize the business

    IT drives outcomes

    Most CIOs are concerned with cybersecurity disruptions, and one in four expect a budget increase of above 10%

    How likely is it that the following factors will disrupt your business in the next 12 months?

    Chart for factors that will disrupt your business

    Looking ahead to 2024, how will your organization's IT spending change compared to spending in 2023?

    Chart of IT spending change

    3. Adoption of Emerging Technology

    • Fastest growing tech for 2024 and beyond

    CIOs plan the most new spend on AI in 2024 and on mixed reality after 2024

    Top five technologies for new spending planned in 2024:

    1. Artificial intelligence - 35%
    2. Robotic process automation or intelligent process automation - 24%
    3. No-code/low-code platforms - 21%
    4. Data management solutions - 14%
    5. Internet of Things (IoT) - 13%

    Top five technologies for new spending planned after 2024:

    1. Mixed reality - 20%
    2. Blockchain - 19%
    3. Internet of Things (IoT) - 17%
    4. Robotics/drones - 16%
    5. Robotic process automation or intelligent process automation - 14%

    n=301

    Info-Tech Insight
    Three in four CIOs say they have no plans to invest in quantum computing, more than any other technology with no spending plans.

    4. Adoption of AI

    • Interest in generative AI applications
    • Tasks to be completed with AI
    • Progress in deploying AI

    CIOs are most interested in industry-specific generative AI applications or text-based

    Rate your business interest in adopting the following generative AI applications:

    Chart for interest in AI

    There is interest across all types of generative AI applications. CIOs are least interested in visual media generators, rating it just 2.4 out of 5 on average.

    n=251

    Info-Tech Insight
    Examples of generative AI solutions specific to the legal industry include Litigate, CoCounsel, and Harvey.

    By the end of 2024, CIOs most often plan to use AI for analytics and repetitive tasks

    Most popular use cases for AI by end of 2024:

    1. Business analytics or intelligence - 69%
    2. Automate repetitive, low-level tasks - 68%
    3. Identify risks and improve security - 66%
    4. IT operations - 62%
    5. Conversational AI or virtual assistants - 57%

    Fastest growing uses cases for AI in 2024:

    1. Automate repetitive, low-level tasks - 39%
    2. IT operations - 38%
    3. Conversational AI or virtual assistants - 36%
    4. Business analytics or intelligence - 35%
    5. Identify risks and improve security - 32%

    n=218

    Info-Tech Insight
    The least popular use case for AI is to help define business strategy, with 45% saying they have no plans for it.

    One in three CIOs are running AI pilots or are more advanced with deployment

    How far have you progressed in the use of AI?

    Chart of progress in use of AI

    Info-Tech Insight
    Almost half of CIOs say ChatGPT has been a catalyst for their business to adopt new AI initiatives.

    5. AI Risk

    • Perceived impact of AI
    • Approach to third-party AI tools
    • AI features in business applications
    • AI governance and accountability

    Six in ten CIOs say AI will have a positive impact on their organization

    What overall impact do you expect AI to have on your organization?

    Overall impact of AI on organization

    The majority of CIOs are waiting for professional-grade generative AI tools

    Which of the following best describes your organization's approach to third-party generative AI tools (such as ChatGPT or Midjourney)?

    Third-party generative AI

    Info-Tech Insight
    Business concerns over intellectual property and sensitive data exposure led OpenAI to announce ChatGPT won't use data submitted via its API for model training unless customers opt in to do so. ChatGPT users can also disable chat history to avoid having their data used for model training (OpenAI).

    One in three CIOs say they are accountable for AI, and the majority are exploring it cautiously

    Who in your organization is accountable for governance of AI?

    Governance of AI

    More than one-third of CIOs say no AI governance steps are in place today

    What AI governance steps does your organization have in place today?

    Chart of AI governance steps

    Among organizations that plan to invest in AI in 2024, 30% still say there are no steps in place for AI governance. The most popular steps to take are to publish clear explanations about how AI is used, and to conduct impact assessments (n=170).

    Chart of AI governance steps

    Among all CIOs, including those that do not plan to invest in AI next year, 37% say no steps are being taken toward AI governance today (n=243).

    6. Contribute to Info-Tech's Research Community

    • Volunteer to be interviewed
    • Attend LIVE in Las Vegas

    It's not too late; take the Future of IT online survey

    Contribute to our tech trends insights

    If you haven't already contributed to our Future of IT online survey, we are keeping the survey open to continue to collect insights and inform our research reports and agenda planning process. You can take the survey today. Those that complete the survey will be sent a complimentary Tech Trends 2024 report.

    Complete an interview for the Future of IT research project

    Help us chart the future course of IT

    If you are receiving this for completing the Future of IT online survey, thank you for your contribution. If you are interested in further participation and would like to provide a complementary interview, please get in touch at brian.Jackson@infotech.com. All interview subjects must also complete the online survey.

    If you've already completed an interview, thank you very much, and you can look forward to seeing more impacts of your contribution in the near future.

    LIVE 2023

    Methodology

    All data in this report is from Info-Tech's Future of IT online survey 2023 edition.

    A CIO focus for the Future of IT

    Data in this report represents respondents to the Future of IT online survey conducted by Info-Tech Research Group between May 11 and July 7, 2023.

    Only CIO respondents were selected for this report, defined as those who indicated they are the most senior member of their organization's IT department.

    This data segment reflects 355 total responses with 239 completing every question on the survey.

    Further data from the Future of IT online survey and the accompanying interview process will be featured in Info-Tech's Tech Trends 2024 report this fall and in forthcoming Priorities reports including Applications, Data & EA, CIO, Infrastructure, and Security.

    Embrace the Inevitability of Multicloud

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}115|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Strategy and Organizational Design
    • Parent Category Link: /strategy-and-organizational-design

    It used to be easy: pick your cloud, build out your IT footprint, and get back to business. But the explosion of cloud adoption has also led to an explosion of options for cloud providers, platforms, and deployment options. And that’s just when talking about infrastructure as a service!

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Multicloud isn’t good or bad; it’s inevitable.
    • Embracing multicloud in your organization is an opportunity to gain control while enabling choice. Although it increases complexity for both IT operations and governance, with the right tools and principles in place you can reduce the IT burden and increase business agility at the same time.

    Impact and Result

    • Understand what multicloud is, what it isn’t, and why you need to accept it in your organization.
    • Keep your cloud strategy but adapt your approach and tools.
    • Leverage best practices and principles that will help you keep control of the volatility and complexity that comes with multicloud.

    Embrace the Inevitability of Multicloud Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Embrace the Inevitability of Multicloud Storyboard – A deck that helps you implement best practices for your multicloud strategy.

    Use this research to understand the risks and benefits that come with a multicloud posture.

    • Embrace the Inevitability of Multicloud Storyboard

    Infographic

    Further reading

    Embrace the Inevitability of Multicloud

    The heterogeneous ecosystem is worth it; you just need a cohesive strategy.

    Executive summary

    Your Challenge

    Common Obstacles

    Info-Tech’s Approach

    It used to be easy: pick your cloud, build out your IT footprint, and get back to business. But the explosion of cloud adoption has also led to an explosion of options for cloud providers, platforms, and deployment. And that’s just when talking about infrastructure as a service!

    For many businesses, one of the key benefits of the cloud ecosystem is enabling choice for different users, groups, and projects in the organization. But this means embracing multiple cloud platforms. Is it worth it?

    The reality is that multicloud is inevitable for most organizations, and if it’s not yet a reality for your IT team, it soon will be. This brings new challenges:

    1. How do I decide what platforms and offerings to use where? Is my old cloud strategy obsolete?
    2. How do I identify what I want out of multicloud, and what tools and best practices need to be in place to keep control?

    By defining your end goals, framing solutions based on the type of visibility and features your multicloud footprint needs to deliver, you can enable choice and improve performance, flexibility, and availability.

    1. Understand what multicloud is, what it isn’t, and why you need to accept it in your organization.
    2. Keep your cloud strategy but adapt your approach and tools.
    3. Leverage best practices and principles that will help you keep control of the volatility and complexity that comes with multicloud.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Embracing multicloud in your organization is an opportunity to gain control while enabling choice. Although it increases complexity for both IT operations and governance, with the right tools and principles in place you can reduce the IT burden and increase business agility at the same time.

    Project overview

    Multicloud isn’t good or bad; it’s inevitable

    The reality is multicloud is usually not a choice. For most organizations, the requirement to integrate with partners, subsidiaries, and parent organizations, as well as the need to access key applications in the software-as-a-service ecosystem, means that going multicloud is a matter of when, not if.

    The real question most businesses should ask is not whether to go multicloud, but rather how to land in multicloud with intent and use it to their best advantage.

    Your workloads will guide the way

    One piece of good news is that multicloud doesn’t change the basic principles of a good cloud strategy. In fact, a well-laid-out multicloud approach can make it even easier to put the right workloads in the right place – and then even move them around as needed.

    This flexibility isn’t entirely free, though. It’s important to know how and when to apply this type of portability and balance its benefits against the cost and complexity that come with it.

    Don’t fall in reactively; land on your feet

    Despite the risks that come with the increased scale and complexity of multicloud, it is possible to maintain control, realize the benefits, and even use multicloud as a springboard for leveraging cloud benefits in your business. By adopting best practices and forethought in key areas of multicloud risk, you can hit the ground running.

    Aligning the terms

    Modern organizations have multiple IT footprints. How do we classify different stances?

    01 Hybrid Cloud
    Private cloud and public cloud infrastructure managed as one entity

    02 Multicloud
    Includes multiple distinct public cloud services, or “footprints”

    03 Hybrid IT
    Putting the right workloads in the right places with an overall management framework

    Info-Tech Insight

    • Hybrid cloud is about applying the same service model across multiple deployment models (most commonly public and private clouds).
    • Multicloud is about using multiple cloud offerings irrespective of differences in service model or deployment model.

    Multicloud

    • An approach that includes multiple distinct public cloud services (e.g. AWS EC2 but also Salesforce and M365)
    • Usually defined around a steady state for each workload and footprint
    • Everything in its right place (with portability for events and disasters)
    • NOT everything everywhere all at once
    The image contains the Info-Tech thought model for multicloud.

    Multicloud is inevitable

    The SaaS ecosystem has led organizations to encourage business units to exercise the IT choices that are best for them.

    The multicloud maturity journey

    1. Move a workload to the cloud
    2. Move more workloads to the same cloud
    3. Move the right workloads to the right clouds
    4. Hybrid cloud & multicloud
    5. Integrate cloud and traditional/ on-premises footprints

    Hybrid IT: Aggregate Management, Monitoring, Optimization, Continuous Improvement

    Multicloud is about enabling choice while maintaining oversight

    The broader your footprint, the harder it becomes to manage risks across each environment.

    The image contains a screenshot of a diagram of maintaining oversight with multicloud.

    Managing multicloud risks

    The risks in multicloud are the same as in traditional cloud but amplified by the differences across footprints and providers in your ecosystem.

    • Variations across platforms include:
      • Rules
      • Security
      • Mapping corresponding products and services
    • Training and certifications by platform/provider
    • Managing cost across footprints
    • Complexity of integration
    • Managing compliance across platforms
    • Loss of standardization due to multicloud fragmentation

    Info-Tech Insight

    Don’t be afraid to ask for help! Each cloud platform you adopt in your multicloud posture requires training, knowledge, and execution. If you’re already leveraging an ecosystem of cloud providers, leverage the ecosystem of cloud enablers as needed to help you on your way.

    Despite the risks, multicloud is a springboard

    Increasing flexibility & accelerating integration

    Because multicloud increases the number of platforms and environments available to us, we can
    use it as a way to increase our agility (from both a DevOps and a resource deployment perspective) as well as to provide an answer to the problem of vendor lock-in.

    Multicloud also can be a catalyst for integrating and stitching together resources and services that were previously isolated from each other. Because of the modular design and API architecture prevalent in cloud services, they can be easily consumed and integrated from your various footprints.

    Modernizing data strategy

    While it may seem counterintuitive, a proactive multicloud approach will allow you to regain visibility and control of your entire data ecosystem. Defining your data architecture and policies with an eye to the inevitability of multicloud means you can go beyond just regaining control of data stranded in SaaS and other platforms; you can start to really understand the flows of data and how they affect your business processes for better or worse.

    Move to cloud-native IT & design

    Embracing multicloud is also a great opportunity to embrace the refactoring and digital transformation you’ve been blocked on. Instead of treading water with respect to keeping control of fragmented applications, services, and workloads, a proactive approach to multicloud allows you to embrace open standards built to deliver cloud-native power and portability and to build automations that increase reliability, performance, and cost effectiveness while reducing your total in-house work burden.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Don’t bite off more than you can chew! Especially with IaaS and PaaS services, it’s important to ensure you have the skills and bandwidth to manage and deploy services effectively. It’s better to start with one IaaS platform, master it, and then expand.

    Let your workloads guide the way

    Multicloud is a road to best-of-breed everything


    A screenshot of multiclouds.

    Stick with a workload-level approach

    The principles of cloud strategy don’t change with multicloud! The image contains a screenshot of a workload-level approach.
    If anything, a multicloud approach increases your ability to put the right workloads in the right places, wherever that may be.
    It can also (with some work and tooling) provide even broader options for portability and resilience.

    Multicloud = multiple right places

    Put everything in its right place.

    Just like with any cloud strategy, start with a workload-level approach and figure out the right migration path and landing point for your workload in cloud.

    Understand the other right places!

    Multicloud means for many workloads, especially IaaS- and PaaS-focused ones, you will have multiple footprints you can use for secondary locations as desired for portability, resilience, and high availability (with the right tooling and design).

    Info-Tech Insight

    Portability is always a matter of balancing increased flexibility, availability, and resilience against increased complexity, maintenance effort, and cost. Make sure to understand the requirement for your workloads and apply portability efforts where they make the most sense

    Your management will need to evolve

    Don’t manage multicloud with off-the-rack tools.

    The default dashboards and management tools from most cloud vendors are a great starting point when managing a single cloud. Unfortunately, most of these tools do not extend well to other platforms, which can lead to multiple dashboards for multiple footprints.

    These ultimately lead to an inability to view your multicloud portfolio in aggregate and fragmentation of metrics and management practices across your various platforms. In such a situation maintaining compliance and control of IT can become difficult, if not impossible!

    Unified standards and tools that work across your entire cloud portfolio will help keep you on track, and the best way to realize these is by applying repeatable, open standards across your various environments and usually adopting new software and tools from the ecosystem of multicloud management software platforms available in the market.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Even in multicloud, don’t forget that the raw data available from the vendor’s default dashboards is a critical source of information for optimizing performance, efficiency, and costs.

    Multicloud management tool selection

    The ecosystem is heterogeneous.

    The explosion of cloud platforms and stacks means no single multicloud management tool can provide support for every stack in the private and public cloud ecosystem. This challenge becomes even greater when moving from IaaS/PaaS to addressing the near-infinite number of offerings available in the SaaS market.

    When it comes to selecting the right multicloud management tool, it’s important to keep a few things in mind:

    1. Mapping your requirements to the feature sets for your multicloud management platform is critical.
    2. Depending on your goals and metrics, and the underlying platforms and data you need to collect from them, you may need more than one tool.
    3. Especially when it comes to integrating SaaS into your multicloud tool(s), development or partners may be required.

    Key Features

    • Portability
    • Cost management
    • Automation across vendors
    • Standardization of configuration
    • Security alignment across vendors
    • Unified provisioning and self-service

    Info-Tech Insight

    SaaS always presents a unique challenge for gathering necessary cloud management data. It’s important to understand what data is and isn’t available and how it can be accessed and made available to your multicloud management tools.

    Understand your vendors

    Define what you are looking for as a first step.

    • To best understand your options, you need to understand the focus, features, and support services for each vendor. Depending on your requirements, you may need to adopt more than one tool.
    • Remember that SaaS presents unique challenges in terms of accessing and ingesting data into your management tools. This will generally require development to leverage the provider’s API.
    • Within the following slides, you will find a defined activity with a working template that will create a vendor profile for each vendor.

    As a working example, you can review these vendors on the following slides:

    • VMware CloudHealth
    • ServiceNow ITOM
    • CloudCheckr

    Info-Tech Insight

    Creating vendor profiles will help quickly identify the management tools that meet your multicloud needs.

    Vendor Profile #1

    VMware CloudHealth

    Vendor Summary

    CloudHealth is a VMware management suite that provides visibility into VMware-based as well as public cloud platforms. CloudHealth focuses on providing visibility to costs and governance as well as applying automation and standardization of configuration and performance across cloud platforms.

    URL: cloudhealth.vmware.com

    Supported Platforms

    Supports AWS, Azure, GCP, OCI, VMware

    Feature Sets

    • Portability
    • Cost management
    • Automation across platforms
    • Standardization of configuration
    • Security alignment across platforms
    • Unified provisioning and self-service

    Vendor Profile #2

    ServiceNow ITOM

    Vendor Summary

    ServiceNow IT Operations Management (ITOM) is a module for the ServiceNow platform that allows deep visibility and automated intervention/remediation for resources across multiple public and private cloud platforms. In addition to providing a platform for managing workload portability and costs across multiple cloud platforms, ServiceNow ITOM offers features focused on delivering “proactive digital operations with AIOps.”

    URL: servicenow.com/products/it-operations-management.html

    Supported Platforms

    Supports CloudFormation, ARM, GDM, and Terraform templates. Also provisions virtualized VMware environments.

    Feature Sets

    • Portability
    • Cost management
    • Automation across platforms
    • Standardization of configuration
    • Security alignment across platforms
    • Unified provisioning and self-service

    Vendor Profile #3

    CloudCheckr

    Vendor Summary

    CloudCheckr is a SaaS platform that provides end-to-end cloud management to control cost, ensure security, optimize resources, and enable services. Primarily focused on enabling management of public cloud services, CloudCheckr’s broad platform support and APIs can be used to deliver unified visibility across many multicloud postures.

    URL: cloudcheckr.com

    Supported Platforms

    Supports AWS, Azure, GCP, SAP Hana

    Feature Sets

    • Portability
    • Cost management
    • Automation across platforms
    • Standardization of configuration
    • Security alignment across platforms
    • Unified provisioning and self-service

    Activity

    Understand your vendor options

    This activity involves the following participants:

    • IT strategic direction decision makers
    • Cloud governance team
    • Cloud deployment team
    • Vendor and portfolio management

    Outcomes of this step:

    • Vendor profile template (ppt)

    Info-Tech Insight

    This checkpoint process creates transparency around agreement costs with the business and gives the business an opportunity to reevaluate its requirements for a potentially leaner agreement.

    Create your vendor profiles

    Define what you are looking for and score vendors accordingly.

    1. Create a vendor profile for every vendor of interest.
    2. Leverage our starting list and template to track and record the advantages of each vendor.

    Vendor Profile Template

    The image contains a screenshot of a Vendor Profile Template.

    Land on your feet

    Best practices to hit the ground running in multicloud

    Focus your multicloud posture on SaaS (to start)

    SaaS

    While every service model and deployment model has its place in multicloud, depending on the requirements of the workload and the business, most organizations end up in multicloud because of the wide ecosystem of options available at the SaaS level.

    Enabling the ability to adopt SaaS offerings into your multicloud footprint should be an area of focus for most IT organizations, as it’s the easiest way to deliver business impact (without taking on additional infrastructure work).

    IaaS and PaaS

    Although IaaS and PaaS also have their place in multicloud, the benefits are usually focused more on increased portability and availability rather than on enabling business-led IT.

    Additionally, multicloud at these levels can often be complex and/or costly to implement and maintain. Make sure you understand the cost-benefit for implementing multicloud at this level!

    Where the data sits matters

    With multiple SaaS workloads as well as IaaS and PaaS footprints, one of the biggest challenges to effective multicloud is understanding where any given data is, what needs access to it, and how to stitch it all together.

    In short, you need a strategy to understand how to collect and consolidate data from your multiple footprints.

    Relying solely on the built-in tools and dashboards provided by each provider inevitably leads to data fragmentation – disparate data sets that make it difficult to gain clear, unified visibility into your cloud’s data.

    To address the challenge of fragmented data, many organizations will require a multicloud-capable management platform that can provide access and visibility to data from all sources in a unified way.

    Weigh portability against nativeness

    When it comes to multicloud, cloud-native design is both your enemy and your friend. On one hand, it provides the ability to fully leverage the power and flexibility of your chosen platform to run your workload in the most on-demand, performance-efficient, utility-optimized way possible.

    But it’s important to remember that building cloud-native for one platform directly conflicts with that workload’s portability to other platforms! You need to understand the balance between portability and native effectiveness that works best for each of your workloads.

    Info-Tech Insight

    You can (sort of) have the best of both worlds! While the decision to focus on the cloud-native products, services, and functions from a given cloud platform must be weighed carefully, it’s still a good idea to leverage open standards and architectures for your workloads, as those won’t hamper your portability in the same way.

    Broaden your cost management approach

    Even on singular platforms, cloud cost management is no easy task. In multicloud, this is amplified by the increased scale and scope of providers, products, rates, and units of measure.

    There is no easy solution to this – ultimately the same accountabilities and tasks that apply to good cost management on one cloud also apply to multicloud, just at greater scale and impact.

    The image contains a screenshot of cost management approach.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Evolving your tooling applies to cost management too. While the vendor-provided tools and dashboards for cost control on any given cloud provider’s platform are a good start and a critical source for data, to get a proper holistic view you will usually require multicloud cost management software (and possibly some development work).

    Think about the sky between the clouds

    A key theme in cloud service pricing is “it’s free to come in, but it costs to leave.” This is a critical consideration when designing the inflows and outflows of data, interactions, transactions, and resources among workloads sitting on different platforms and different regions or footprints.

    When defining your multicloud posture, think about what needs to flow between your various clouds and make sure to understand how these flows will affect costs, performance, and throughput of your workloads and the business processes they support.

    • Integration and Interfaces
    • Business Process and Application Flows
    • Inter-cloud Transit Costs

    Mature your management technology

    Automation Is Your Friend

    Managing multicloud is a lot of work. It makes sense to eliminate the most burdensome and error-prone tasks. Automating these tasks also increases the ease and speed of workload portability in most cases.

    Automation and scheduling are also key enablers of standardization – which is critical to managing costs and other risks in multicloud. Create policies that manage and optimize costs, resource utilization, and asset configuration. Use these to reduce the management burden and risk profile.

    Evolve Your Tooling

    Effective multicloud management requires a clear picture of your entire cloud ecosystem across all footprints. This generally isn’t possible using the default tools for any given cloud vendor. Fortunately, there is a wide ecosystem of multicloud tools to help provide you with a unified view.

    The best cloud management tools will not only allow you to get a unified view of your IT operations regardless of where the resources lie but also help you to evaluate your multiple cloud environments in a unified way, providing a level playing field to compare and identify opportunities for improvement.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Embrace openness! Leveraging open standards and technologies doesn’t just ease portability in multicloud; it also helps rationalize telemetry and metrics across platforms, making it easier to achieve a unified management view.

    Multicloud security

    Multicloud security challenges remain focused around managing user and role complexity

    • Fragmentation of identity and access management
    • Controlling access across platforms
    • Increased complexity of roles
    • API security
    • Managing different user types and subscriptions across different service models
    • Managing security best practices across multiple platforms
    • Potential increased attack surface

    Info-Tech Insight

    Don’t reinvent the wheel! Where possible, leverage your existing identity and access management platforms and role-based access control (RBAC) discipline and extend them out to your cloud footprints.

    Don’t fall in reactively!

    1. Multicloud isn’t bad or good.
    2. Put everything the right place; understand the other right places.
    3. Know where your data goes.
    4. Automation is your friend.
    5. Strategy fundamentals don’t change.
    6. Focus on SaaS (to start).
    7. Embrace openness.
    8. Modernize your tools.

    Related Info-Tech Research

    Define Your Cloud Vision
    This blueprint covers a workload-level approach to determining cloud migration paths

    10 Secrets for Successful Disaster Recovery in the Cloud
    This research set covers general cloud best practices for implement DR and resilience in the cloud.

    Bibliography

    “7 Best Practices for Multi-Cloud Management.” vmware.com, 29 April 2022. Web.
    Brown, Chalmers. “Six Best Practices For Multi-Cloud Management.” Forbes, 22 Jan. 2019. Web.
    Curless, Tim. “The Risks of Multi-Cloud Outweigh the Benefits.” AHEAD, n.d. Web.
    Tucker, Ryan. “Multicloud Security: Challenges and Solutions.” Megaport, 29 Sept 2022. Web.
    Velimirovic, Andreja. “How to Implement a Multi Cloud Strategy.” pheonixNAP, 23 June 2021. Web.
    “What is a Multi-Cloud Strategy?” vmware.com, n.d. Web.

    Develop an IT Infrastructure Services Playbook

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}451|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 10.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: 2 Average Days Saved
    • member rating average days saved: After each Info-Tech experience, we ask our members to quantify the real-time savings, monetary impact, and project improvements our research helped them achieve.
    • Parent Category Name: Operations Management
    • Parent Category Link: /i-and-o-process-management
    • Infrastructure and operations teams are managing deployments on- and off-premises, and across multiple infrastructure services providers.
    • Though automation tools speed up the delivery process, documentation is always pushed off so the team can meet urgent deadlines.
    • Without documented delivery processes, wait times are longer, controls are adequate but ad hoc, builds are non-standard, and errors are more likely to be introduced in production.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Prioritize in-demand services to add to the playbook. Pilot a few services to get value from the project quickly.
    • Do not get lost in automation or tooling. You do not need a complex tool or back-end automation to get value from this project.
    • Learn, then iterate. With a few completed service processes, it is much easier to identify opportunities for service automation.

    Impact and Result

    • Prioritize in-demand services for documentation and standardization.
    • Build service workflows and document service requirements in the services playbook.
    • Create a costing model and track costs to deliver defined services.
    • Leverage data on costs and service requirements to improve service delivery.

    Develop an IT Infrastructure Services Playbook Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read this Executive Brief to find out why you should create an infrastructure services playbook, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Define and prioritize infrastructure services

    Produce a prioritized list of high-demand infrastructure services.

    • Develop an IT Infrastructure Services Playbook – Phase 1: Define and Prioritize Infrastructure Services
    • Infrastructure Services Playbook

    2. Build workflows and an infrastructure services playbook

    Design workflows and create the first draft of the infrastructure services playbook.

    • Develop an IT Infrastructure Services Playbook – Phase 2: Build Workflows and an Infrastructure Services Playbook
    • Infrastructure Service Workflows (Visio)
    • Infrastructure Service Workflows (PDF)

    3. Identify costs and mature service delivery capabilities

    Build a service rate sheet to track costs and develop better service capabilities.

    • Develop an IT Infrastructure Services Playbook – Phase 3: Identify Costs and Mature Service Delivery Capabilities
    • Service Rate Sheet
    • Infrastructure Service Catalog Mind Map Example
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Develop an IT Infrastructure Services Playbook

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Define and Prioritize Infrastructure Services

    The Purpose

    Define and prioritize infrastructure services.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Identify candidate services for the Playbook.

    Activities

    1.1 Define the services you own.

    1.2 Prioritize infrastructure services.

    Outputs

    Affinity map of infrastructure services

    Service pain points and root causes

    A list of high-demand infrastructure services

    2 Build the Infrastructure Services Playbook

    The Purpose

    Build workflows and an infrastructure services playbook.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Produce a draft infrastructure services playbook.

    Activities

    2.1 Design workflow for service delivery.

    2.2 Add steps and requirements to the Services Playbook.

    Outputs

    Documented service workflows

    Infrastructure Services Playbook

    3 Identify Costs and Mature Service Delivery Capabilities

    The Purpose

    Identify costs and mature service delivery capabilities.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Build an infrastructure service rate sheet.

    Define next steps for infrastructure service capabilities.

    Activities

    3.1 Optimize infrastructure cost estimates.

    3.2 Mature your I&O organization into a service broker.

    Outputs

    Service Rate Sheet

    Master list of infrastructure services

    Action plan for Playbook implementation

    Further reading

    Develop an IT Infrastructure Services Playbook

    Automation, SDI, and DevOps – build a cheat sheet to manage a changing Infrastructure & Operations environment.

    Table of contents

    Analyst Perspective

    Executive Summary

    Project Overview

    Summary and Conclusion

    ANALYST PERSPECTIVE

    Technology is changing how infrastructure services are delivered.

    "Managing a hybrid infrastructure environment is challenge enough. Add to this the pressure on IT Operations to deliver services faster and more continuously – it’s a recipe for boondoggle deployments, overcommitted staff, end-user frustration, and operational gridlock.

    It’s not every service you provide that causes problems, so prioritize a few in-demand, painful services. Build and maintain durable, flexible processes that enable your team to provide consistent, repeatable services at a standard cost. Identify opportunities to improve service delivery.

    You’ll save the business time and money and your own team significant grief." (Andrew Sharp, Research Manager, Infrastructure & Operations, Info-Tech Research Group)

    Your infrastructure and operations team is a service provider; standardize, document, and communicate service capabilities

    This Research is Designed For:

    • CTOs and Infrastructure Managers
    • Service Level Managers
    • ITSM Managers and Process Owners

    This Research Will Help You:

    • Inventory services that IT Infrastructure & Operations (I&O) provides to the business (servers, storage, and network).
    • Standardize services and track costs.
    • Articulate the value of these services to business owners.
    • Develop a catalog of infrastructure services.

    This Research Will Also Assist:

    • CIOs
    • Application Development Managers
    • Security Managers
    • Auditors

    This Research Will Help Them:

    • Understand the complexities of technical service delivery.
    • Make better strategic IT infrastructure decisions.

    Executive summary

    Situation

    • Infrastructure and operations teams are managing deployments on- and off-premises and across multiple infrastructure service providers.
    • Though automation tools speed up the delivery process, documentation is always pushed off so the team can meet urgent deadlines.

    Complication

    • Cloud providers have set the bar high for ease of access to stable infrastructure services.
    • Without documented delivery processes, wait times are longer, controls are adequate but ad hoc, builds are non-standard, and errors are more likely to be introduced in production.

    Resolution

    • Prioritize in-demand services for documentation and standardization.
    • Build service workflows and document service requirements in the services playbook.
    • Create a costing model and track costs to deliver defined services.
    • Leverage data on costs and service requirements to improve service delivery.

    Info-Tech Insight

    1. Keep it simple. Work through a few in-demand services to get early value from the project.
    2. Don’t get lost in automation or tooling. You don’t need a complex tool or back-end automation to get value from standardized services.
    3. Do then iterate. With a few completed service processes, it’s much easier to identify opportunities for service automation.

    Create an infrastructure services playbook to improve efficiency, support DevOps, and streamline service delivery

    Begin building an infrastructure services playbook by defining the services you provide. This will also help your team support changes to service delivery (e.g. more use of cloud services and the shift to DevOps).

    In this blueprint, the first step will be to document infrastructure services to:

    1. Clarify infrastructure capabilities and achievable service levels.

      Document infrastructure services to clarify achievable service levels with given resources and what you will need to meet service-level requirement gaps. Establishing your ability to meet customer demands is the first step toward becoming a broker of internal or external services.
    2. Standardize infrastructure service delivery.

      Sometimes, it’s extremely important to do the exact same thing every time (e.g. server hardening). Sometimes, your team needs room to deviate from the script. Create a playbook that allows you to standardize service delivery as needed.
    3. Make good strategic infrastructure decisions.

      Knowledge is power. Defined services and capabilities will help you make important strategic infrastructure decisions around capacity planning and when outsourcing is appropriate.

    Review and optimize infrastructure service delivery as you shift to more cloud-based services

    If you can’t standardize and streamline how you support cloud services, you risk AppDev and business leaders circumventing the I&O team.

    Logo for 'vmware'.

    Example:

    Create a new server resource in a virtual environment vs. public cloud

    In a virtualized environment, provisioning processes can still be relatively siloed.

    In a software-defined environment, many steps require knowledge across the infrastructure stack. Better documentation will help your team deliver services outside their area of specialty.

    Logo for 'Microsoft Azure'.
    • Identify CPU requirements for a virtual machine (VM)
    • Calculate VM memory requirements
    • Configure the floppy drive for a VM
    • Configure IDE devices for a VM
    • Configure SCSI adapters for a VM
    • Configure network adapters for a VM
    • Configure VM priority for host CPU resources
    • Server is live

    • Complete SDI code development & review, version control, build status, etc.
    • Identify software and specifications for the instance you want to use
    • Review configuration, storage, and security settings
    • Secure the instance with an existing key pair or create a new key pair
    • Update documentation – public IP address, physical & logical connections, data flows, etc.
    • Launch and connect to instance
    • Server is live

    Strengthen DevOps with an infrastructure playbook

    The purpose behind DevOps is to reduce friction and deliver faster, more continuous, more automated services through the use of cross-functional teams.

    DevOps: bridging Applications Development and Infrastructure & Operations by embracing a culture, practices, and tools born out of Lean and Agile methodologies.

    • Create a common language across functions.
    • Ensure that all service steps are documented.
    • Move towards more standard deployments.
    • Increase transparency within the IT department.
    • Cultivate trust across teams.
    • Build the foundation for automated services.
    A colorful visualization of the DevOps cycle. On the Development side is 'Feedback', Plan', 'Build', 'Integrate', then over to the Operations side is 'Deploy', and 'Operate', then back to Dev with 'Feedback', starting the cycle over again.

    "The bar has been raised for delivering technology products and services – what was good enough in previous decades is not good enough now." (Kim, Humble, Debois, Willis (2016))

    Leverage an infrastructure services playbook to improve service delivery, one step at a time

    Crawl

    • Prioritize infrastructure services that are good candidates for standardization.
    • Document the steps and requirements to deliver the service.
    • Use the playbook and workflows internally as you gather requirements and deliver on requests.
    • Track costs internally.

    Walk

    • Provide infrastructure clients with the playbook and allow them to make requests against it.
    • Update and maintain existing documentation.
    • Automate, where possible.
    • Showback costs to the business.

    Run

    • Provide infrastructure customers with scripts to provision infrastructure resources.
    • Audit requests before fulfilling them.
    • Chargeback costs, as needed.
    A turtle smiles happily on four legs, simply content to be alive. Another turtle moves quickly on two legs, seemingly in a runner's trance, eyes closed, oblivious to the fact that another turtle has beaten him to finish line.

    Focus on in-demand infrastructure services — PHASE 1

    Standardize in-demand, repeatable services first.

    Demand for infrastructure services is usually driven by external requests or operational requirements. Prioritize services based on criticality, durability, frequency, availability, and urgency requirements.

    Scheduling Delays
    • Dealing with a slew of capital projects driven by a major funding initiative, the IT team of a major US transit system is struggling to execute on basic operational tasks.

    • Action:
    • A brainstorming and prioritization exercise identifies web server deployment as their most in-demand service.
    • Identifying breakdowns in web server deployment helps free up resources for other tasks and addresses a serious pain point.
    Think outside the box
    • On a new project for a sporting goods client, the IT department for a marketing firm deploys and supports a “locker” kiosk that users engage with for a chance to win a gift.

    • Action:
    • As the campaign proves successful, the I&O Manager creates a playbook to guide kiosk support and deployment in the future, including required skills, timelines, success metrics, and costs.
    Keep it standard, keep it safe
    • An IT audit at a higher education institution finds that no standard process for server hardening has been defined or documented by the infrastructure team.

    • Action:
    • Improving IT security is a strategic priority for the department.
    • The infrastructure team decides to standardize and document processes, guidelines, and configurations for hardening OS, SCCM, SaltStack, scripting, and patching.

    Leverage service workflows to populate the playbook — PHASE 2

    Infrastructure as Code is breaking down traditional infrastructure silos and support models.

    1. Document the workflow to deliver the service. Identify pain points and target broken processes first.
      Provision –› Configure –› Run –› Quiesce –› Destroy
    2. Define logical expected results and metrics for problematic steps in the process. Identify challenges and possible improvements to each problematic step.
      Building and deploying toolsets is taking a long time
      Start
      • Create a baseline offering for common requests.
      • Make clear that non-standard requests will take time to fulfil.
      Stop
      • Move to just one web server.
      Continue
      • Use weekly drop-ins to communicate the change.
    3. Document skills and roles, approvers, and pre-requirements to fill out the documentation, as needed. Use the documented process to guide internal process and align with external expectations.

    Cross-silo knowledge is needed: In a software-defined environment, building and launching a new server requires knowledge across the stack.

    • Complete SDI code development & review, version control, build status, etc.
    • Identify software and specifications for the instance you want to use
    • Review configuration, storage, and security settings
    • Secure the instance with an existing key pair, or create a new key pair
    • Update documentation – public IP address, physical & logical connections, data flows, etc.
    • Launch and connect to the instance
    • Server is live

    Take a progressive approach to cost tracking — PHASE 3

    Infrastructure & Operations are bound by two metrics:

    1. Are systems up?
    2. Is technology delivered as efficiently as possible?

    Because tracking cost is integral to efficiency, cost and budget management, by proxy, is one of the most important Infrastructure & Operations metrics.

    Cost management is not a numbers game. It is an indicator of how well infrastructure is managed.

    Track costs in a practical way that delivers value to your organization:

    1. Build and leverage an internal rate sheet to help estimate cost to serve.
    2. Showback rate sheet to help managers and architects make better infrastructure decisions.
    3. Chargeback costs to defined cost centers.

    Project overview

    Use Info-Tech’s methodology to get value faster from your infrastructure services playbook.

    Phases

    Phase 1: Define and prioritize infrastructure services Phase 2: Build the infrastructure services playbook Phase 3: Identify costs and mature service delivery capabilities

    Steps

    1.1 Define the services you own 2.1 Design workflows for service delivery 3.1 Estimate infrastructure service costs
    1.2 Prioritize infrastructure services 2.2 Add steps and requirements to the services playbook 3.2 Mature your I&O organization into a service broker

    Tools & Templates

    Infrastructure Services Playbook Infrastructure Service Workflows Service Rate Sheet

    Use these icons to help direct you as you navigate this research

    Use these icons to help guide you through each step of the blueprint and direct you to content related to the recommended activities.

    A small monochrome icon of a wrench and screwdriver creating an X.

    This icon denotes a slide where a supporting Info-Tech tool or template will help you perform the activity or step associated with the slide. Refer to the supporting tool or template to get the best results and proceed to the next step of the project.

    A small monochrome icon depicting a person in front of a blank slide.

    This icon denotes a slide with an associated activity. The activity can be performed either as part of your project or with the support of Info-Tech team members, who will come onsite to facilitate a workshop for your organization.

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    Guided Implementation

    Workshop

    Consulting

    "Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful." "Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track." "We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place." "Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project."

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

    Guided Implementation Overview

    Your Trusted Advisor is just a call away.

    Scoping
    (Call 1)

    Scope requirements, objectives, and stakeholders. Review the playbook toolset and methodology, and establish fit-for-need.

    Identify Services
    (Call 2)

    Brainstorm common infrastructure services your group provides. Consolidate the list and identify priority services.

    Create Service Workflows
    (Calls 3-4)

    Build Visio workflows for 2-3 priority services.

    Populate the Playbook
    (Calls 4-5)

    Add data to the playbook based on infrastructure service workflows

    Create a Rate Sheet for Costs
    (Call 6)

    Build a rate sheet that allows you to calculate costs for additional

    Your Guided Implementation will pair you with an advisor from our analyst team for the duration of your infrastructure services project.

    Workshop Overview

    Module 1
    (Day 1)
    Module 1
    (Day 1)
    Module 1
    (Day 1)
    Offsite deliverables wrap-up (Day 5)
    Activities
    Define and Prioritize Infrastructure Services

    1.1 Assess current maturity of services and standardization processes.

    1.2 Identify, group, and break out important infrastructure services.

    1.3 Define service delivery pain points and perform root-cause analysis.

    1.4 Prioritize services based on demand criteria.

    Build the Infrastructure Services Playbook

    2.1 Determine criteria for standard versus custom services.

    2.2 Document standard workflows for better alignment and consistent delivery.

    2.3 Build a flowchart for the identified high-demand service(s).

    2.4 Outline information as it relates to the service lifecycle in the Playbook template.

    Identify Costs and Mature Service Delivery Capabilities

    4.1 Gather information for the rate sheet.

    4.2 Choose an allocation method for overhead costs.

    4.3 Select the right approach in the crawl, walk, run model for your organization.

    4.4 Discuss the promotion plan and target revision dates for playbook and rate sheet.

    Deliverables
    1. High-demand infrastructure services list
    1. Right-sized criteria for standardization
    2. Service workflows
    3. Infrastructure Services Playbook
    1. Service Rate Sheet
    2. Deployment plan

    Develop an IT Infrastructure Services Playbook

    PHASE 1

    Define and Prioritize Infrastructure Services

    Step 1.1: Define the services you own

    PHASE 1

    Define and prioritize infrastructure services

    1.1

    Define the services you own

    1.2

    Prioritize infrastructure services

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Define “infrastructure service”
    • Brainstorm service offerings
    • Consolidate services with affinity map

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Infrastructure Manager
    • I&O SMEs

    Results & Insights

    • Results: Consolidated list of end-to-end services
    • Insights: Avoid analysis paralysis by brainstorming without restrictions. It is more effective to cut down in Step 1.2 rather than risk neglecting important services for the playbook.

    Consider a range of infrastructure services

    Your infrastructure team is a service provider to the applications team – and sometimes other users as well.

    Service Requests
    • A developer requests a new web server.
    • The marketing department asks for a database to support a six-month digital marketing campaign.
    Projects
    • A new service is promoted to production.
    Operations
    • Firewall rules are updated to support server, network, or security posture changes.
    • Standard practices are followed and maintained to harden a range of different operating systems.
    • Engineers follow a standard process to integrate new tools and entitlements into Active Directory.
    • Patches and firmware updates are applied to core infrastructure components as needed.
    Problems
    • A database batch job often breaks on overnight batch jobs and requires manual intervention to check and restart.
    A visualization of the word 'Infrastructure Services' being orbited by 'Service Requests', 'Projects', 'Operations', and 'Problems'.

    IT infrastructure & operations teams deliver services that fulfil requests, support projects, resolve problems, and operate systems.

    Demystify the New PMBOK Guide and PMI Certifications

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}446|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Portfolio Management
    • Parent Category Link: /portfolio-management
    • There is lots of confusion with the latest edition of A Guide to The Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide).
    • The Project Management Professional (PMP) certification is not satisfying the needs of PMOs.
    • There is still a divide on whether the focus should be on the PMP or an Agile-related certification.
    • The PMP certification has lost its sizzle while other emerging certifications have started to penetrate the market. It’s hard to distinguish which certifications still hold weight.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • The PMP certification is still valuable and worth your time in 2023.
    • There are still over a million active PMP-certified individuals worldwide.
    • PMP can make you more money.

    Impact and Result

    • Study the market trends for certification options as they emerge and evolve.
    • Go with longstanding, reputable certifications, but be ready to pivot if they are not adding value.
    • Look at the job market as an indicator of certification demands.
    • There are a lot of certification options out there, and every day there seems to be a new one that pops up. Wait and see how the market reacts before investing your time and money in a new certification.

    Demystify the New PMBOK Guide and PMI Certifications Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Demystify the New PMBOK and PMI Certifications Storyboard – A guide to validate if the PMP is still valuable. It will also provide clarity related to the updated PMBOK 7th edition.

    This publication will validate if the PMP certification is still valuable and worth your time. In addition, you will gain different perspectives related to other PMI and non-PMI certifications. You will gain a better understanding of the evolution of the PMBOK Guide, and the significant changes made from PMBOK 6th edition to the 7th edition.

    • Demystify the New PMBOK and PMI Certifications Storyboard
    [infographic]

    Further reading

    Demystify the New PMBOK Guide and the PMI Certifications

    The PMP certification is still valuable and worth your time in 2023.

    Analyst Perspective

    The PMP (Project Management Professional) certification is still worth your time.

    Long Dam

    I often get asked, “Is the PMP worth it?” I then proceed with a question of my own: “If it gets you an interview or a foot in the door or bolsters your salary, would it be worth it?” Typically, the answer is a resounding “YES!”

    CIO magazine ranked the PMP as the top project management certification in North America because it demonstrates that you have the specific skills employers seek, dedication to excellence, and the capacity to perform at the highest levels.

    Given its popularity and the demand in the marketplace, I strongly believe it is still worth your time and investment. The PMP is a globally recognized certification that has dominated for decades. It is hard to overlook the fact that the Project Management Institute (PMI) has more than 1.2 million PMP certification holders worldwide and is still considered the gold standard for project management.

    Yes, it’s worth it. It gets you interviews, a foot in the door, and bolsters your salary. Oh, and it makes you a more complete project manager.

    Long Dam, PMP, PMI-ACP, PgMP, PfMP

    Principal Research Director, Project Portfolio Management Practice
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    • There is lots of confusion with the latest A Guide to The Project Management Body of Knowledge (aka PMBOK Guide).
    • The Project Management Professional (PMP) certification is not satisfying the needs of PMOs.
    • There is still a divide on whether the focus should be on the PMP or an Agile-related certification.

    The PMP certification has lost its sizzle while other emerging certifications have started to penetrate the market. It’s hard to distinguish which certification still holds weight.

    Common Obstacles

    • Poor understanding and lack of awareness of other PMI certifications outside of the PMP.
    • There are too many competing certifications out there, and it’s hard to decipher which ones to choose.
    • PMI certifications typically take a lot of effort to obtain and maintain.

    There are other, less intensive certifications available. It’s unclear what will be popular in the future.

    Info-Tech's Approach

    • Study the market trends for certification options as they emerge and evolve.
    • Go with longstanding reputable certifications, but be ready to pivot if they are not adding value.
    • Look at the job market as an indicator for certification demands.

    There are a lot of certification options out there, and every day there seems to be a new one that pops up. Wait and see how the market reacts before investing your time and money in a new certification.

    Info-Tech Insight

    The PMP certification is still valuable and worthy of your time in 2023.

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    "Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful."

    Guide Implementation

    "Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track."

    Workshop

    "We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place."

    Consulting

    "Our team does not have the time or knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of the this project."

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks are used throughout all four options.

    The PMP dominated the market for decades and got over 1 million people certified

    Total active project management professional holders from December 2021 versus July 2022

    Info-Tech Insight

    The PMI’s flagship PMP certification numbers have not significantly increased from 2021 to 2022. However, PMP substantially outpaces all competitors with over 1.2 million certified PMPs.

    Source: projectmanagement.com

    The PMP penetrated over 200 countries

    PMP is the global project management gold standard.

    • CIO magazine ranked the PMP as the top project management certification because it demonstrates you have the specific skills employers seek, dedication to excellence, and the capacity to perform at the highest levels.
    • It delivers real value in the form of professional credibility, deep knowledge, and increased earning potential. Those benefits have staying power.
    • The PMP now includes predictive, Agile, and hybrid approaches.
    • The PMP demonstrates expertise across the wide array of planning and work management styles.

    Source: PMI, “PMP Certification.” PMI, “Why You Should Get the PMP.”

    The PMP was valuable in the past specifically because it was the standard

    79% of project managers surveyed have the PMP certification out of 30,000 respondents in 40 countries.

    The PMP became table stakes for jobs in project management and PMO’s.

    Work desk with project management written in middle. Arrows point to: Goals, planning, risks, control, teamwork, cost, communication, and problem solving.

    Source: PMI’s Earning Power: Project Management Salary Survey—Twelfth Edition (2021)

    The PMP put itself on a collision course with Agile

    • The Agile Certified Practitioner (PMI-ACP) was introduced in 2012 which initially clashed with the PMP for project management supremacy from the PMI.
    • Then the Disciplined Agile (DA) was introduced in 2019, which further compounded the issue and caused even more confusion with both the PMP and the PMI-ACP certification.
    • Instead of complementing the PMP, these certifications began to inadvertently compete with it head-to-head.

    There is a new PMBOK Guide Seventh Edition in town

    The PMI made its most significant changes between 2017 and 2021.

    Chart showing editions of the PMBOK guide from 1996 to 2021.

    Timeline adapted from Wikipedia, “Project Management Body of Knowledge.”

    Roughly every 3-5 years, the PMI has released a new PMBOK version. It’s unclear if there will be an eighth edition.

    The market got confused by PMBOK Guide – Seventh Edition

    PMBOK guide version 5 considered the gold standard, version 6 first included Agile and version 7 was the most radical change.

    • Die-hard traditional project managers have a hard time grasping why the PMI messed around with the PMBOK Guide. There is sentiment that the PMBOK Guide V7 got diluted.
    • Naysayers do not think that the PMBOK Guide V7 hit the mark and found it to be a concession to Agilists.
    • The PMBOK Guide V7 was significantly trimmed down by almost two-thirds to 274 pages whereas the PMBOK V6 ballooned to 756 pages!
    • Some Agile practitioners found this to be a refreshing, bold move from the PMI. Most, however, ignored or resisted it.
    PMBOK Guide: A guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge Seventh Edition.  AND The Standard for Project Management.

    PMBOK Guide – Seventh edition released in 2021

    • The PMBOK Guide – Seventh Edition was released in late 2021. It was the most radical change since 1987. For the first time, the PMI went from a process-based standard to a principles-based standard, and the guide went from knowledge areas to project performance domains. This may have diluted the traditional predictive project management practices. However, it was offset by incorporating more iterative, Agile, and hybrid approaches.
    • The market is confused and is clearly shifting toward Agile and away from the rigor that is typically associated with the PMI.
    • The PMI transitioned most of the process-based standards & ITTO to their new digital PMIStandards+ online platform, which can be found here (access for PMI members only).
    • The PMBOK Guide is not the sole basis of the certification exam; however, it can be used as one of several reference resources. Using the exam content outline (ECO) is the way forward, which can be found here.

    The Agile certification seems to be the focus for the PMI in the coming years

    • The PMI started to get into the Agile game with the introduction of Agile certifications, which is where all the confusion started. Although the PMI-ACP & the DASM have seen a steady uptake recently, it appears to be at the expense of the PMP certification.
    • The PMI acquired the Discipline Agile (DA) in late 2019, which expanded their offerings and capabilities for project managers and teams to choose their “way of working.”
    • This was an important milestone for the PMI to address the new way of working for Agile practitioners with this offering to provide more options and to better support enterprise agility.
    PMI-ACP & the DASM have seen a steady uptake recently.

    Source: projectmanagement.com as of July 2022

    The PMI has lost more certified PMPs than they have gained so far in 2022

    The PMI has lost more certified PMPs than they have gained so far in 2022.

    PMP

    PMP – Project Management Professional

    It is a concerning trend that their bread and butter, the PMP flagship certification, has largely stalled in 2022. We are unsure if this was attributed to them being displaced by competitors such as the Agile Alliance, their own Agile offerings, or the market’s lackluster reaction to PMBOK Guide – Seventh Edition.

    Source: projectmanagement.com as of July 2022

    The PMI’s total memberships have stalled since September 2021

    The PMIs total memberships have stalled since September 2021.

    PMI: Project Management Insitute

    The PMI’s membership appears to have a direct correlation to the PMP numbers. As the PMP number stalls, so do the PMI’s memberships.

    Source: projectmanagement.com as of July 2022

    The PMP and the PMBOK Guide are more focused on project management

    The knowledge and skills were not all that helpful for running programs, portfolios, and PMOs.
    • It became evident that other certifications were more tightly aligned to program and portfolio management for the PMOs. The PMI provides the following:
      • Program Management Professional (PgMP)
      • Portfolio Management Professional (PfMP)
    • Axelos also has certifications for program management and portfolio management, such as:
      • Managing Successful Programmes (MSP)
      • Management of Portfolios (MoP)
      • Portfolio, Programme, and Project Offices (P3O)

    The market didn’t know what to do with the PgMP or the PfMP

    These were relatively unknown certifications for Program and Portfolio Management.

    • The PMI’s story was that you would start as a project manager with the PMP certification and then the natural progression would be toward either Program Management (PgMP) or Portfolio Management (PfMP).
    • The uptake for the PgMP and the PfMP certification has been insignificant and underwhelming. The appetite and the demand for PMO-aligned certifications has been lackluster since their inception.
    PgMP - Program Management Professional and PfMP - Portfolio Management Professioanal Certifications are relatively unkown. PgMP only has 3780 members since 2007, and PfMP has 1266 since 2014.

    Source: projectmanagement.com as of July 2022

    There are other non-PMI certifications to consider

    Depending on your experience level

    List of non-PMI certifications based on specialization. List of non-PMI certifications based on years of experience.  Divided into 3 categories: 0-3 years, 3+ years, and 8+ years of experience.

    Other non-PMI project management certifications

    Non-PMI project management certifications

    PRINCE2 and CSM appear to be the more popular ones in the market.

    In April 2022, CIO.com outlined other popular project management certifications outside of the PMI.

    Source: CIO.com

    Project managers have an image problem among senior leaders

    There is a perception that PMs are just box-checkers and note-takers.

    • Project managers are seen as tactical troubleshooters rather than strategic partners. This suggests a widespread lack of understanding of the value and impact of project management at the C-suite level.
    • Very few C-suite executives associate project managers with "realizing visions," being "essential," or being "changemakers."
    • Strong strategic alignment between the PMO and the C-suite helps to reinforce the value of project management capabilities in achieving wider strategic aims.

    Source: PMI, Narrowing The Talent Gap, 2021

    Hiring practices have yet to change in response to the PMI’s moves

    The PMP is still the standard, even for organizations transitioning to Agile and PMO/portfolio jobs.

    • Savvy business leaders are still unsure about how Agile will impact them in the long term.
    • According to the Narrowing the Talent Gap report, PMI and PwC’s latest global research indicates that talent strategies haven’t changed much. There’s a widespread lack of focus on developing and retaining existing project managers, and a lack of variety and innovation in attracting and recruiting new talent. The core problem is that there isn’t a business case for investment in talent.

    Noteworthy Agile certifications to consider

    AGILE Certified Practioner(PMI-ACP) and Certified ScrumMaster(CSM) certification details.

    Source: PMI, “Agile Certifications,” and ScrumAlliance, “Become a Certified ScrumMaster.”

    Info-Tech Insight

    There is a lot of chatter about which Agile certification is better, and the jury is still out with no consensus. There are pros and cons to both certifications. We believe the PMI-ACP will give you more mileage and flexibility because of its breath of coverage in the Agile practice compared to the CSM.

    The talent shortage is a considerable risk to organizations

    • According to the PMI’s 2021 Talent Gap report1, the talent gap is likely to impact every region. By 2030, at least 13 million project managers are expected to have retired, creating additional challenges for recruitment. To close the gap, 25 million new project professionals are needed by 2030.
    • Young project managers will change the profession. Millennials and Generation Z are bringing fresh perspectives to projects. Learning to work alongside these younger generations isn't optional, as they increasingly dominate the labor force and extend their influence.
    • Millennials have already arrived: According to Pew Research2, this group surpassed Gen X in 2016 and is now the largest generation in the US labor force.

    1. PMI, Talent Gap, 2021.
    2. PM Network, 2019.

    Money talks – the PMP is still your best payoff

    It is a financially rewarding profession!

    The median salary for PMP holders in the US is 25% higher than those without PMP certification.

    On a global level, the Project Management Professional (PMP) certification has been shown to bolster salary levels. Holders of the PMP certification report higher median salaries than those without a PMP certification – 16% higher on average across the 40 countries surveyed.

    Source: PMI, Earning Power, 2021

    Determine which skills and capabilities are needed in the coming years

    • A scan of 2022 PM and PMO postings still shows continued dominance of the PMP certification requirement.
    • People and relationships have become more important than predicting budgets and timelines.
    • The PMI and PwC Global Survey on Transformation and Project Management 2021 identified the top five skills/capabilities for project managers (in order of priority):
      1. Relationship building
      2. Collaborative leadership
      3. Strategic thinking
      4. Creative problem solving
      5. Commercial awareness

    Source: PMI, Narrowing The Talent Gap, 2021.

    Prepare for product delivery by focusing on top digital-age skills

    According to the PMI Megatrends 2022 report, they have identified six areas as the top digital-age skills for product delivery:

    1. Innovative mindset
    2. Legal and regulatory compliance knowledge
    3. Security and privacy knowledge
    4. Data science skills
    5. Ability to make data-driven decisions
    6. Collaborative leadership skills

    Many organizations aren’t considering candidates who don’t have project-related qualifications. Indeed, many more are increasing the requirements for their qualifications than those who are reducing it.

    Source: PMI, Narrowing The Talent Gap, 2021

    Prioritize training and development at the C-suite level

    Currently, there is an imbalance with more emphasis of training on tools, processes, techniques, and methodologies rather than business acumen skills, collaboration, and management skills. With the explosion of remote work, training needs to be revamped and, in some cases, redesigned altogether to accommodate remote employees.

    Train of gears Labeled: Training. Gears from left to right are labeled: Knowledge, coaching, skills, developement, and experience.

    Lack of strategic prioritization is evident in how training and development is being done, with organizations largely not embracing a diversity of learning preferences and opportunities.

    Source: PMI, Narrowing The Talent Gap, 2021

    PM is evolving into a more strategic role

    • Ensure program and portfolio management roles are supported by the most appropriate certifications.
    • For project managers that have evolved beyond the iron triangle of managing projects, there is applicability to the PgMP and the PfMP for program managers, portfolio managers, and those in charge of PMOs.
    • Although these certifications have not been widely adopted due to lack of awareness and engagement at the decision-maker level, they still hold merit and prestige within the project management community.

    Project managers are evolving. No longer creatures of scope, schedule, and budget alone, they are now – enabled by new technology – focusing on influencing outcomes, building relationships, and achieving the strategic goals of their organizations.

    Source: PMI, Narrowing the Talent Gap, 2021

    Overhaul your recruitment practices to align with skills/capabilities

    World map with cartoon profile images, linked in a network.

    Talent managers will need to retool their toolbox to fill the capability gap and to look beyond where the role is geographically based by embracing flexible staffing models.

    They will need to evolve their talent strategies in line with changing business priorities.

    Organizations should be actively working to increase the diversity of candidates and upskilling young people in underrepresented communities as a priority.

    Most organizations are still relying on traditional approaches to recruit talent. Although we are prioritizing power skills and business acumen, we are still searching in the same, shrinking pool of talent.

    Source: PMI, Narrowing the Talent Gap, 2021.

    Bibliography

    “Agile Certifications for Every Step in Your Career.” PMI. Web.

    “Become a Certified ScrumMaster and Help Your Team Thrive.” ScrumAlliance. Web.

    “Become a Project Manager.” PMI. Accessed 14 Sept. 2022.

    Bucero, A. “The Next Evolution: Young Project Managers Will Change the Profession: Here's What Organizations Need to Know.” PM Network, 2019, 33(6), 26–27.

    “Certification Framework.” PMI. Accessed 14 Sept. 2022.

    “Certifications.” PMI. Accessed 14 Sept. 2022.

    DePrisco, Mike. Global Megatrends 2022. “Foreword.” PMI, 2022. Accessed 14 Sept. 2022.

    Earning Power: Project Management Salary Survey. 12th ed. PMI, 2021. Accessed 14 Sept. 2022.

    “Global Research From PMI and PwC Reveals Attributes and Strategies of the World’s Leading Project Management Offices.” PMI, 1 Mar. 2022. Press Release. Accessed 14 Sept. 2022.

    Narrowing the Talent Gap. PMI, 2021. Accessed 14 Sept. 2022.

    “PMP Certification.” PMI. Accessed 4 Aug. 2022.

    “Project Management Body of Knowledge.” Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation, 29 Aug. 2022.

    “Project Portfolio Management Pulse Survey 2021.” PwC. Accessed 30 Aug. 2022.

    Talent Gap: Ten-Year Employment Trends, Costs, and Global Implications. PMI. Accessed 14 Sept. 2022.

    “The Critical Path.” ProjectManagement.com. Accessed 14 Sept. 2022.

    “True Business Agility Starts Here.” PMI. Accessed 14 Sept. 2022.

    White, Sarah K. and Sharon Florentine. “Top 15 Project Management Certifications.” CIO.com, 22 Apr. 2022. Web.

    “Why You Should Get the PMP.” PMI. Accessed 14 Sept. 2022.

    Build Your First RPA Bot

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}238|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.4/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $53,126 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 24 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Optimization
    • Parent Category Link: /optimization
    • Your organization has many business processes that rely on manual, routine, and repetitive data collection and processing work. These processes need to be automated to meet strategic priorities.
    • Your stakeholders decided to invest in robotic process automation (RPA). They are ready to begin the planning and delivery of their first RPA bot.
    • However, your organization lacks the critical foundations involved in successful RPA delivery, such as analysis of the suitability of candidate processes, business and IT collaboration, and product ownership.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Manage your business and IT debt before you adopt RPA. RPA doubles down on your process inefficiencies, lack of operations and architectural standardization, and unenforced quality standards. RPA solutions will be fragile and prone to failure if debt is not managed.
    • Adopt BizDevOps. RPA will not be successful if your lines-of-business (LOBs) and IT are not working together. IT must empathize with how LOBs operate and proactively support the underlying operational systems. LOBs must be accountable for all products leveraging RPA and be able to rationalize RPA’s technical feasibility.
    • Start with RPA 1.0. Don’t get caught up in the AI and machine learning (RPA 2.0) hype. Evaluate the acceptance and value of RPA 1.0 to establish a sustainable and collaborative foundation for its delivery and management. Then use the lessons learned to prepare for future RPA 2.0 adoption. In many cases, RPA 1.0 is good enough.

    Impact and Result

    • Establish the right expectations. Gain a grounded understanding of RPA value and limitations in your context. Discuss current IT and business operations challenges to determine if they will impact RPA success.
    • Build your RPA governance. Clarify the roles, processes, and tools needed to support RPA delivery and management through IT and business collaboration.
    • Evaluate the fit of RPA. Obtain a thorough view of the business and technical complexities of your candidate processes. Indicate where and how RPA is expected to generate the most return.

    Build Your First RPA Bot Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out how you should build your first RPA bot, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Define your RPA governance

    Set the expectations of your first RPA bot. Define the guiding principles, ethics, and delivery capabilities that will govern RPA delivery and support.

    • Build Your First RPA Bot – Phase 1: Define Your RPA Governance

    2. Deliver and manage your bots

    Validate the fit of your candidate business processes for RPA and ensure the support of your operational system. Shortlist the features of your desired RPA vendor. Modernize your delivery process to accommodate RPA.

    • Build Your First RPA Bot – Phase 2: Deliver and Manage Your Bots

    3. Roadmap your RPA adoption

    Build a roadmap of initiatives to implement your first bot and build the foundations of your RPA practice.

    • Build Your First RPA Bot – Phase 3: Roadmap Your RPA Adoption
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Build Your First RPA Bot

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Define Your RPA Governance

    The Purpose

    State the success criteria of your RPA adoption through defined objectives and metrics.

    Define your RPA guiding principles and ethics.

    Build the RPA capabilities that will support the delivery and management of your bots.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Grounded stakeholder expectations

    RPA guiding principles

    RPA capabilities and the key roles to support RPA delivery and management

    Activities

    1.1 State Your RPA Objectives.

    1.2 Define Your RPA Principles

    1.3 Develop Your RPA Capabilities

    Outputs

    RPA objectives and metrics

    RPA guiding principles and ethics

    RPA and product ownership, RPA capabilities, RPA role definitions

    2 Deliver and Manage Your Bots

    The Purpose

    Evaluate the fit of your candidate business processes for automation.

    Define the operational platform to support your RPA solution.

    Shortlist the desired RPA vendor features.

    Optimize your product delivery process to support RPA.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Verifies the decision to implement RPA for the candidate business process

    The system changes and modifications needed to support RPA

    Prioritized list of RPA vendor features

    Target state RPA delivery process

    Activities

    2.1 Prepare Your RPA Platform

    2.2 Select Your RPA Vendor

    2.3 Deliver and Manage Your Bots

    Outputs

    Assessment of candidate business processes and supporting operational platform

    List of desired RPA vendor features

    Optimized delivery process

    3 Roadmap Your RPA Adoption

    The Purpose

    Build your roadmap to implement your first RPA bot and build the foundations of your RPA practice.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Implementation initiatives

    RPA adoption roadmap

    Activities

    3.1 Roadmap Your RPA Adoption

    Outputs

    RPA adoption roadmap

    Network Segmentation

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}503|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Network Management
    • Parent Category Link: /network-management
    • Many legacy networks were built for full connectivity and overlooked potential security ramifications.
    • Malware, ransomware, and bad actors are proliferating. It is not a matter of if you will be compromised but how can the damage be minimized.
    • Cyber insurance will detective control, not a preventative one. Prerequisite audits will look for appropriate segmentation.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Lateral movement amplifies damage. Contain movement within the network through segmentation.
    • Good segmentation is a balance between security and manageability. If solutions are too complex, they won’t be updated or maintained.
    • Network services and users change over time, so must your segmentation strategy. Networks are not static; your segmentation must maintain pace.

    Impact and Result

    • Create a common understanding of what is to be built, for whom, and why.
    • Define what services will be offered and how they will be governed.
    • Understand which assets that you already have can jump start the project.

    Network Segmentation Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Network Segmentation Deck – A deck to help you minimize risk by controlling traffic flows within the network.

    Map out appropriate network segmentation to minimize risk in your network.

    • Network Segmentation Storyboard
    [infographic]

    Further reading

    Network Segmentation

    Protect your network by controlling the conversations within it.

    Executive Summary

    Info-Tech Insight

    Lateral movement amplifies damage

    From a security perspective, bad actors often use the tactic of “land and expand.” Once a network is breached, if east/west or lateral movement is not restricted, an attacker can spread quickly within a network from a small compromise.

    Good segmentation is a balance between security and manageability

    The ease of management in a network is usually inversely proportional to the amount of segmentation in that network. Highly segmented networks have a lot of potential complications and management overhead. In practice, this often leads to administrators being confused or implementing shortcuts that circumvent the very security that was intended with the segmentation in the first place.

    Network services and users change over time, so must your segmentation strategy

    Network segmentation projects should not be viewed as singular or “one and done.” Services and users on a network are constantly evolving; the network segmentation strategy must adapt with these changes. Be sure to monitor and audit segmentation deployments and change or update them as required to maintain a proper risk posture.

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    Common Obstacles

    Info-Tech’s Approach

    Networks are meant to facilitate communication, and when devices on a network cannot communicate, it is generally seen as an issue. The simplest answer to this is to design flat, permissive networks. With the proliferation of malware, ransomware, and advanced persistent threats (ATPs) a flat or permissive network is an invitation for bad actors to deliver more damage at an increased pace.

    Cyber insurance may be viewed as a simpler mitigation than network reconfiguration or redesign, but this is not a preventative solution, and the audits done before policies are issued will flag flat networks as a concern.

    Network segmentation is not a “bolt on” fix. To properly implement a minimum viable product for segmentation you must, at a minimum:

    • Understand the endpoints and their appropriate traffic flows.
    • Understand the technologies available to implement segmentation.

    Implementing appropriate segmentation often involves elements of (if not a full) network redesign.

    To ensure the best results in a timely fashion, Info-Tech recommends a methodology that consists of:

    • Understand the network (or subset thereof) and prioritizing segmentation based on risk.
    • Align the appropriate segmentation methodology for each surfaced segment to be addressed.
    • Monitor the segmented environment for compliance and design efficacy, adding to and modifying existing as required.

    Info-Tech Insight

    The aim of networking is communication, but unfettered communication can be a liability. Appropriate segmentation in networks, blocking communications where they are not required or desired, restricts lateral movement within the network, allowing for better risk mitigation and management.

    Network segmentation

    Compartmentalization of risk:

    Segmentation is the practice of compartmentalizing network traffic for the purposes of mitigating or reducing risk. Segmentation methodologies can generally be grouped into three broad categories:

    1. Physical Segmentation

    The most common implementation of physical segmentation is to build parallel networks with separate hardware for each network segment. This is sometimes referred to as “air gapping.”

    2. Static Virtual Segmentation

    Static virtual segmentation is the configuration practice of using technologies such as virtual LANs (VLANs) to assign ports or connections statically to a network segment.

    3. Dynamic Virtual Segmentation

    Dynamic virtual segmentation assigns a connection to a network segment based on the device or user of the connection. This can be done through such means as software defined networking (SDN), 802.1x, or traffic inspection and profiling.

    Common triggers for network segmentation projects

    1. Remediate Audit Findings

    Many security audits (potentially required for or affecting premiums of cyber insurance) will highlight the potential issues of non-segmented networks.

    2. Protect Vulnerable Technology Assets

    Whether separating IT and OT or segmenting off IoT/IIoT devices, keeping vulnerable assets separated from potential attack vectors is good practice.

    3. Minimize Potential for Lateral Movement

    Any organization that has experienced a cyber attack will realize the value in segmenting the network to slow a bad actor’s movement through technology assets.

    How do you execute on network segmentation?

    The image contains a screenshot of the network segmentation process. The process includes: identify risk, design segmentation, and operate and optimize.

    Identify risks by understanding access across the network

    Gain visibility

    Create policy

    Prioritize change

    "Security, after all, is a risk business. As companies don't secure everything, everywhere, security resilience allows them to focus their security resources on the pieces of the business that add the most value to an organization, and ensure that value is protected."

    – Helen Patton,

    CISO, Cisco Security Business Group, qtd. In PR News, 2022

    Discover the data flows within the network. This should include all users on the network and the environments they are required to access as well as access across environments.

    Examine the discovered flows and define how they should be treated.

    Change takes time. Use a risk assessment to prioritize changes within the network architecture.

    Understand the network space

    A space is made up of both services and users.

    Before starting to consider segmentation solutions, define whether this exercise is aimed at addressing segmentation globally or at a local level. Not all use cases are global and many can be addressed locally.

    When examining a network space for potential segmentation we must include:

    • Services offered on the network
    • Users of the network

    To keep the space a consumable size, both of these areas should be approached in the abstract. To abstract, users and services should be logically grouped and generalized.

    Groupings in the users and services categories may be different across organizations, but the common thread will be to contain the amount of groupings to a manageable size.

    Service Groupings

    • Are the applications all components of a larger service or environment?
    • Do the applications serve data of a similar sensitivity?
    • Are there services that feed data and don’t interact with users (IoT, OT, sensors)?

    User Groupings

    • Do users have similar security profiles?
    • Do users use a similar set of applications?
    • Are users in the same area of your organization chart?
    • Have you considered access by external parties?

    Info-Tech Insight

    The more granular you are in the definition of the network space, the more granular you can be in your segmentation. The unfortunate corollary to this is that the difficulty of managing your end solution grows with the granularity of your segmentation.

    Create appropriate policy

    Understand which assets to protect and how.

    Context is key in your ability to create appropriate policy. Building on the definition of the network space that has been created, context in the form of the appropriateness of communications across the space and the vulnerabilities of items within the space can be layered on.

    To decide where and how segmentation might be appropriate, we must first examine the needs of communication on the network and their associated risk. Once defined, we can assess how permissive or restrictive we should be with that communication.

    The minimum viable product for this exercise is to define the communication channel possibilities, then designate each possibility as one of the following:

    • Permissive – we should freely allow this traffic
    • Restricted – we should allow some of the traffic and/or control it
    • Rejected – we should not allow this traffic

    Appropriate Communications

    • Should a particular group of users have access to a given service?
    • Are there external users involved in any grouping?

    Potential Vulnerabilities

    • Are the systems in question continually patched/updated?
    • Are the services exposed designed with the appropriate security?

    Prioritize the potential segmentation

    Use risk as a guide to prioritize segmentation.

    For most organizations, the primary reason for network segmentation is to improve security posture. It follows that the prioritization of initiatives and/or projects to implement segmentation should be based on risk.

    When examining risk, an organization needs to consider both:

    • Impact and likelihood of visibility risk in respect to any given asset, data, or user
    • The organization’s level of risk tolerance

    The assets or users that are associated with risk levels higher than the tolerance of the organization should be prioritized to be addressed.

    Service Risks

    • If this service was affected by an adverse event, what would the impact on the organization be?

    User Risks

    • Are the users in question FTEs as opposed to contractors or outsourced resources?
    • Is a particular user group more susceptible to compromise than others?

    Info-Tech Insight

    Be sure to keep this exercise relative so that a clear ranking occurs. If it turns out that everything is a priority, then nothing is a priority. When ranking things relative to others in the exercise, we ensure clear “winners” and “losers.”

    Assess risk and prioritize action

    1-3 hours

    1. Define a list of users and services that define the network space to be addressed. If the lists are too long, use an exercise like affinity diagramming to appropriately group them into a smaller subset.
    2. Create a matrix from the lists (put users and services along the rows and columns). In the intersecting points, label how the traffic should be treated (e.g. Permissive, Restricted, Rejected).
    3. Examine the matrix and assess the intersections for risk using the lens of impact and likelihood of an adverse event. Label the intersections for risk level with one of green (low impact/likelihood), yellow (medium impact/likelihood), or red (high impact/likelihood).
    4. Find commonalities within the medium/high areas and list the users or services as priorities to be addressed.
    Input Output
    • Network, application, and security documentation
    • A prioritized list of areas to address with segmentation
    Materials Participants
    • Whiteboard/Flip Charts

    OR

    • Excel spreadsheet
    • Network Team
    • Application Team
    • Security Team
    • Data Team

    Design segmentation

    Segmentation comes in many flavors; decide which is right for the specific circumstance.

    Methodology

    Access control

    "Learning to choose is hard. Learning to choose well is harder. And learning to choose well in a world of unlimited possibilities is harder still, perhaps too hard."

    ― Barry Schwartz, The Paradox of Choice: Why More Is Less

    What is the best method to segment the particular user group, service, or environment in question?

    How can data or user access move safely and securely between network segments?

    Decide on which methods work for your circumstances

    You always have options…

    There are multiple lenses to look through when making the decision of what the correct segmentation method might be for any given user group or service. A potential subset could include:

    • Effort to deploy
    • Cost of the solution
    • Skills required to operate
    • Granularity of the segmentation
    • Adaptability of the solution
    • Level of automation in the solution

    Info-Tech Insight

    Network segmentation within an organization is rarely a one-size-fits-all proposition. Be sure to look at each situation that has been identified to need segmentation and align it with an appropriate solution. The overall number of solutions deployed has to maintain a balance between that appropriateness and the effort to manage multiple environments.

    Framework to examine segmentation methods

    To assess we need to understand.

    To assess when technologies or methodologies are appropriate for a segmentation use case, we need to understand what those options are. We will be examining potential segmentation methods and concepts within the following framework:

    WHAT

    A description of the segmentation technology, method, or concept.

    WHY

    Why would this be used over other choices and/or in what circumstances?

    HOW

    A high-level overview of how this option could or would be deployed.

    Notional assessments will be displayed in a sidebar to give an idea of Effort, Cost, Skills, Granularity, Adaptability, and Automation.

    Implement

    Notional level of effort to implement on a standard network

    Cost

    Relative cost of implementing this segmentation strategy

    Maintain

    Notional level of time and skills needed to maintain

    Granularity

    How granular this type of segmentation is in general

    Adaptability

    The ability of the solution to be easily modified or changed

    Automation

    The level of automation inherent in the solution

    Air gap

    … And never the twain shall meet.

    – Rudyard Kipling, “The Ballad of East and West.”

    WHAT

    Air gapping is a strategy to protect portions of a network by segmenting those portions and running them on completely separate hardware from the primary network. In an air gap scenario, the segmented network cannot have connectivity to outside networks. This difference makes air gapping a very specific implementation of parallel networks (which are still segmented and run on separate hardware but can be connected through a control point).

    WHY

    Air gap is a traditional choice when environments need to be very secure. Examples where air gaps exist(ed) are:

    • Operational technology (OT) networks
    • Military networks
    • Critical infrastructure

    HOW

    Most networks are not overprovisioned to a level that physical segmentation can be done without purchasing new equipment. The major steps required for constructing an air gap include:

    • Design segmentation
    • Purchase and install new hardware
    • Cable to new hardware

    The image contains a screenshot that demonstrates pie graphs with the notional assessments: Effort, Cost, Skills, Granularity, and Automation.

    Info-Tech Insight

    An air gapped network is the ultimate in segmentation and security … as long as the network does not require connectivity. It is unfortunately rare in today’s world that a network will stand on its own without any need for external connectivity.

    VLAN

    Do what you can, with what you’ve got…

    – Theodore Roosevelt

    WHAT

    Virtual local area networks (VLANs) are a standard feature on today’s firewalls, routers, and manageable switches. This configuration option allows for network traffic to be segmented into separate virtual networks (broadcast domains) on existing hardware. This segmentation is done at layer 2 of the OSI model. All traffic will share the same hardware but be partitioned based on “tags” that the local device applies to the traffic. Because of these tags, traffic is handled separately at layer 2 of the OSI model, but traffic can pass between segments at layer 3 (e.g. IP layer).

    WHY

    VLANs are commonly used because most existing deployments already have the technology available without extra licensing. VLANs are also potentially used as foundational components in more complex segmentation strategies such as static or dynamic overlays.

    HOW

    VLANs allow for segmentation of a device at the port level. VLAN strategies are generally on a location level (e.g. most VLAN deployments are local to a site, though the same structure may be used among sites). To deploy VLANs you must:

    • Define VLAN segments
    • Assign ports appropriately

    The image contains a screenshot that demonstrates pie graphs with the notional assessments: Effort, Cost, Skills, Granularity, and Automation.

    Info-Tech Insight

    VLANs are tried and true segmentation workhorses. The fact that they are already included in modern manageable solutions means that there is very little reason to not have some level of segmentation within a network.

    Micro-segmentation

    Everyone is against micromanaging, but macro managing means you’re working on the big picture but don’t understand the details.

    – Henry Mintzberg

    WHAT

    Micro-segmentation is used to secure and control network traffic between workloads. This is a foundational technology when implementing zero trust or least-privileged access network designs. Segmentation is done at or directly adjacent to the workload (on the system or its direct network connectivity) through firewall or similar policy controls. The controls are set to only allow the network communication required to execute the workload and is limited to appropriate endpoints. This restrictive design restricts all traffic (including east-west) and reduces the attack surface.

    WHY

    Micro-segmentation is primarily used:

    • In server-to-server communication.
    • When lateral movement by bad actors is identified as a concern.

    HOW

    Micro-segmentation can be deployed at different places within the connectivity depending on the technologies used:

    • Workload/server (e.g. server firewall)
    • VM network overlay (e.g. VMware NSX)
    • Network port (e.g. ACL, firewall, ACI)
    • Cloud native (e.g. Azure Firewall)

    Info-Tech Insight

    Micro-segmentation is necessary in the data center to limit lateral movement. Just be sure to be thorough in defining required communication as this technology works on allowlists, not traditional blocklists.

    Static overlay

    Adaptability is key.

    – Marc Andreessen

    WHAT

    Static overlays are a form of virtual segmentation that allows multiple network segments to exist on the same device. Most of these solutions will also allow for these segments to expand across multiple devices or sites, creating overlay virtual networks on top of the existing physical networks. The static nature of the solution is because the ports that participate in the overlays are statically assigned and configured. Connectivity between devices and sites is done through encapsulation and may have a dynamic component of the control plane handled through routing protocols.

    WHY

    Static overlays are commonly deployed when the need is to segment different use cases or areas of the organization consistently across sites while allowing easy access within the segments between sites. This could be representative of segmenting a department like Finance or extending a layer 2 segment across data centers.

    HOW

    Static overlays are can segment and potentially extend a layer 2 or layer 3 network. These solutions could be executed with technologies such as:

    • VXLAN (Virtual eXtensible LAN)
    • MPLS (Multi Protocol Label Switching)
    • VRF (Virtual Routing & Forwarding)

    The image contains a screenshot that demonstrates pie graphs with the notional assessments: Effort, Cost, Skills, Granularity, and Automation.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Static overlays are commonly deployed by telecommunications providers when building out their service offerings due to the multitenancy requirements of the network.

    Dynamic overlay

    Never tell people how to do things. Tell them what to do and they will surprise you with their ingenuity.

    – George S. Patton

    WHAT

    A dynamic overlay segmentation solution has the ability to make security or traffic decisions based on policy. Rather than designing and hardcoding the network architecture, the policy is architected and the network makes decisions based on that policy. Differing levels of control exist in this space, but the underlying commonality is that the segmentation would be considered “software defined” (SDN).

    WHY

    Dynamic overlay solutions provide the most flexibility of the presented solutions. Some use cases such as BYOD or IoT devices may not be easily identified or controlled through static means. As a general rule of thumb, the less static the network is, the more dynamic your segmentation solution must be.

    HOW

    Policy is generally applied at the network ingress. When applying policy, which policy to be applied can be identified through different methodologies such as:

    • Authentication (e.g. 802.1x)
    • Device agents
    • Device profiling

    The image contains a screenshot that demonstrates pie graphs with the notional assessments: Effort, Cost, Skills, Granularity, and Automation.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Dynamic overlays allow for more flexibility through its policy-based configurations. These solutions can provide the highest value when positioned where we have less control of the points within a network (e.g. BYOD scenarios).

    Define how your segments will communicate

    No segment is an island…

    Network segmentation allows for protection of devices, users, or data through the act of separating the physical or virtual networks they are on. Counter to this protective stance, especially in today’s networks, these devices, users, or data tend to need to interact with each other outside of the neat lines we draw for them. Proper network segmentation has to allow for the transfer of assets between networks in a safe and secure manner.

    Info-Tech Insight

    The solutions used to facilitate the controlled communication between segments has to consider the friction to the users. If too much friction is introduced, people will try to find a way around the controls, potentially negating the security that is intended with the solution.

    Potential access methods

    A ship in harbor is safe, but that is not what ships are built for.

    – John A. Shedd

    Firewall

    Two-way controlled communication

    Firewalls are tried and true control points used to join networks. This solution will allow, at minimum, port-level control with some potential for deeper inspection and control beyond that.

    • Traditionally firewalls are sized to handle internet-bound (North-South) traffic. When being used between segments, (East-West) loads are usually much higher, necessitating a more powerful device.

    Jump Box

    A place between worlds

    Also sometimes referred to as a “Bastion Host,” a jump box is a special-purpose computer/server that has been hardened and resides on multiple segments of a network. Administrators or users can log into this box and use it to securely use the tools installed to act on other segments of the network.

    • Jump box security is of utmost importance. Special care should be taken in hardening, configuration, and application installed to ensure that users cannot use the box to tunnel or traverse between the segments outside of well-defined and controlled circumstances.

    Protocol Gateway

    Command-level control

    A protocol gateway is a specific and special subset of a firewall. Whereas a firewall is a security generalist, a protocol gateway is designed to understand and have rule-level control over the commands passing through it within defined protocols. This granularity, for example, allows for control and filtering to only allow defined OT commands to be passed to a secure SCADA network.

    • Protocol gateways are generally specific feature sets of a firewall and traditionally target OT network security as their core use case.

    Network Pump

    One-way data extraction

    A network pump is a concept designed to allow data to be transferred from a secure network to a less secure network while still protecting against covert channels such as using the ACK within a transfer to transmit data. A network pump will consist of trusted processes and schedulers that allow for data to pass but control channels to be sufficiently modified so as to not allow security concerns.

    • Network pumps would generally be deployed in the most security demanding of environments and are generally not “off the shelf” products.

    Operate and optimize

    Security is not static. Monitor and iterate on policies within the environment.

    Monitor

    Iterate

    Two in three businesses (68%) allow more employee data access than necessary.

    GetApp's 2022 Data Security Survey Report

    Are the segmentation efforts resulting in the expected traffic changes? Are there any anomalies that need investigation?

    Using the output from the monitoring stage, refine and optimize the design by iterating on the process.

    Monitor for efficacy, compliance, and the unknown

    Monitor to ensure your intended results and to identify new potential risks.

    Monitoring network segments

    A combination of passive and active monitoring is required to ensure that:

    • The rules that have been deployed are working as expected.
    • Appropriate proof of compliance is in place for auditing and insurance purposes.
    • Environments are being monitored for unexpected traffic.

    Active monitoring goes beyond the traditional gathering of information for alerts and dashboards and moves into the space of synthetic users and anomaly detection. Using these strategies helps to ensure that security is enforced appropriately and responses to issues are timely.

    "We discovered in our research that insider threats are not viewed as seriously as external threats, like a cyberattack. But when companies had an insider threat, in general, they were much more costly than external incidents. This was largely because the insider that is smart has the skills to hide the crime, for months, for years, sometimes forever."

    – Dr. Larry Ponemon, Chairman Ponemon Institute, at SecureWorld Boston

    Info-Tech Insight

    Using solutions like network detection and response (NDR) will allow for monitoring to take advantage of advanced analytical techniques like artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML). These technologies can help identify anomalies that a human might miss.

    Monitoring options

    It’s not what you look at that matters, it’s what you see.

    – Henry David Thoreau

    Traditional

    Monitor cumulative change in a variable

    Traditional network monitoring is a minimum viable product. With this solution variables can be monitored to give some level of validation that the segmentation solution is operating as expected. Potential areas to monitor include traffic volumes, access-list (ACL) matches, and firewall packet drops.

    • This is expected baseline monitoring. Without at least this level of visibility, it is hard to validate the solutions in place

    Rules Based

    Inspect traffic to find a match against a library of signatures

    Rules-based systems will monitor traffic against a library of signatures and alert on any matches. These solutions are good at identifying the “known” issues on the network. Examples of these systems include security incident and event management (SIEM) and intrusion detection/prevention systems (IDS/IPS).

    • These solutions are optimally used when there are known signatures to validate traffic against.
    • They can identify known attacks and breaches.

    Anomaly Detection

    Use computer intelligence to compare against baseline

    Anomaly detection systems are designed to baseline the network traffic then compare current traffic against that to find anomalies using technologies like Bayesian regression analysis or artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML). This strategy can be useful in analyzing large volumes of traffic and identifying the “unknown unknowns.”

    • Computers can analyze large volumes of data much faster than a human. This allows these solutions to validate traffic in (near) real-time and alert on things that are out of the ordinary and would not be easily visible to a human.

    Synthetic Data

    Mimic potential traffic flows to monitor network reaction

    Rather than wait for a bad actor to find a hole in the defenses, synthetic data can be used to mimic real-world traffic to validate configuration and segmentation. This often takes the form of real user monitoring tools, penetration testing, or red teaming.

    • Active monitoring or testing allows a proactive stance as opposed to a reactive one.

    Gather feedback, assess the situation, and iterate

    Take input from operating the environment and use that to optimize the process and the outcome.

    Optimize through iteration

    Output from monitoring must be fed back into the process of maintaining and optimizing segmentation. Network segmentation should be viewed as an ongoing process as opposed to a singular structured project.

    Monitoring can and will highlight where and when the segmentation design is successful and when new traffic flows arise. If these inputs are not fed back through the process, designs will become stagnant and admins or users will attempt to find ways to circumvent solutions for ease of use.

    "I think it's very important to have a feedback loop, where you're constantly thinking about what you've done and how you could be doing it better. I think that's the single best piece of advice: constantly think about how you could be doing things better and questioning yourself."

    – Elon Musk, qtd. in Mashable, 2012

    Info-Tech Insight

    The network environment will not stay static; flows will change as often as required for the business to succeed. Take insights from monitoring the environment and integrate them into an iterative process that will maintain relevance and usability in your segmentation.

    Bibliography

    Andreessen, Marc. “Adaptability is key.” BrainyQuote, n.d.
    Barry Schwartz. The Paradox of Choice: Why More Is Less. Harper Perennial, 18 Jan. 2005.
    Capers, Zach. “GetApp’s 2022 Data Security Report—Seven Startling Statistics.” GetApp,
    19 Sept. 2022.
    Cisco Systems, Inc. “Cybersecurity resilience emerges as top priority as 62 percent of companies say security incidents impacted business operations.” PR Newswire, 6 Dec. 2022.
    “Dynamic Network Segmentation: A Must-Have for Digital Businesses in the Age of Zero Trust.” Forescout Whitepaper, 2021. Accessed Nov. 2022.
    Eaves, Johnothan. “Segmentation Strategy - An ISE Prescriptive Guide.” Cisco Community,
    26 Oct. 2020. Accessed Nov. 2022.
    Kambic, Dan, and Jason Fricke. “Network Segmentation: Concepts and Practices.” Carnegie Mellon University SEI Blog, 19 Oct. 2020. Accessed Nov. 2022.
    Kang, Myong H., et al. “A Network Pump.” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 22 no. 5, May 1996.
    Kipling, Rudyard. “The Ballad of East and West.” Ballads and Barrack-Room Ballads, 1892.
    Mintzberg, Henry. “Everyone is against micro managing but macro managing means you're working at the big picture but don't know the details.” AZ Quotes, n.d.
    Murphy, Greg. “A Reimagined Purdue Model For Industrial Security Is Possible.” Forbes Magazine, 18 Jan. 2022. Accessed Oct. 2022.
    Patton, George S. “Never tell people how to do things. Tell them what to do and they will surprise you with their ingenuity.” BrainyQuote, n.d.
    Ponemon, Larry. “We discovered in our research […].” SecureWorld Boston, n.d.
    Roosevelt, Theodore. “Do what you can, with what you've got, where you are.” Theodore Roosevelt Center, n.d.
    Sahoo, Narendra. “How Does Implementing Network Segmentation Benefit Businesses?” Vista Infosec Blog. April 2021. Accessed Nov. 2022.
    “Security Outcomes Report Volume 3.” Cisco Secure, Dec 2022.
    Shedd, John A. “A ship in harbor is safe, but that is not what ships are built for.” Salt from My Attic, 1928, via Quote Investigator, 9 Dec. 2023.
    Singleton, Camille, et al. “X-Force Threat Intelligence Index 2022” IBM, 17 Feb. 2022.
    Accessed Nov. 2022.
    Stone, Mark. “What is network segmentation? NS best practices, requirements explained.” AT&T Cyber Security, March 2021. Accessed Nov. 2022.
    “The State of Breach and Attack Simulation and the Need for Continuous Security Validation: A Study of US and UK Organizations.” Ponemon Institute, Nov. 2020. Accessed Nov. 2022.
    Thoreau, Henry David. “It’s not what you look at that matters, it’s what you see.” BrainyQuote, n.d.
    Ulanoff, Lance. “Elon Musk: Secrets of a Highly Effective Entrepreneur.” Mashable, 13 April 2012.
    “What Is Microsegmenation?” Palo Alto, Accessed Nov. 2022.
    “What is Network Segmentation? Introduction to Network Segmentation.” Sunny Valley Networks, n.d.

    Optimize Social Media Strategy by Service

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}562|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 10.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $12,599 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 5 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Marketing Solutions
    • Parent Category Link: /marketing-solutions
    • Many organizations are jumping the gun on service selection and missing valuable opportunities to tap into conversations their consumers are having about them.
    • Companies are struggling to harness real benefits from social media because they dive into content and engagement strategy without spending the appropriate amount of time on social media service selection.
    • After organizations have selected the appropriate social media services, clients fail to understand best practices for participating in conversations and therefore are unable to optimize their success on each service.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Conventional wisdom dictates that you should pick the social network where you have the greatest subscriber base to reach, but this is irrelevant. Organizations need to consider all the social media services available when selecting services, to ensure they are optimizing their social media strategy and interacting with the right people.
    • In today’s social media landscape there is a wide variety of social media services to choose from. Services range from hot micro-blogging services, like Twitter, to more niche social multimedia services, like Flickr or Vimeo.
    • Each department should manage its set of relevant services regardless of platform. For example a marketing manager should manage all social media services in marketing, rather than have one person manage all Twitter feeds, one person manage all Facebook pages, etc.
    • The services your organization selects shouldn’t operate as islands. Consider not only how the services will fit with each other, but also how they will fit with existing channels. Use a market coverage model to ensure the services you select are complementing each other.
    • The landscape for social media services changes rapidly. It is essential to conduct an audit of services to maintain an optimal mix of services. Conduct the audit semi-annually for best effect.

    Impact and Result

    • Learn about the importance of choosing the correct services to ensure you are reaching your consumers and not wasting time playing with the wrong people.
    • Understand the business use cases for each service and best practices for using them.
    • Leverage different social media services to create a market coverage model that balances social media services with your products/services and business objectives.
    • Identify the risks associated with specific platforms and ensure IT works to mitigate them.
    • Create a plan for conducting a Social Media Service Audit to stay on top of changing trends.

    Optimize Social Media Strategy by Service Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Create the right social media service mix

    Understand the different social media services, their unique value propositions for customer interaction, and the content and timing best practices for each.

    • Storyboard: Optimize Social Media Strategy by Service
    • Social Media Service Selection Tool

    2. Execute a plan for social service selection and management

    Leverage different social media services to create a market coverage model and assign responsibilities.

    3. Perform a semi-annual social media service audit

    Conduct an audit to stay on top of changing trends.

    • Social Media Services Audit Template
    [infographic]

    Manage Exponential Value Relationships

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}210|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Vendor Management
    • Parent Category Link: /vendor-management

    Implementing exponential IT will require businesses to work with external vendors to facilitate the rapid adoption of cutting-edge technologies such as generative artificial intelligence. IT leaders must:

    These challenges require new skills which build trust and collaboration among vendors.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    Outcome-based relationships require a higher degree of trust than traditional vendor relationships. Build trust by sharing risks and rewards.

    Impact and Result

    • Assess your readiness to take on the new types of vendor relationships that will help you succeed.
    • Identify where you need to build your capabilities in order to successfully manage relationships.
    • Successfully manage outcomes, financials, risk, and relationships in complex vendor relationships.

    Manage Exponential Value Relationships Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Manage Exponential Value Relationships Storyboard – Learn about the new era of exponential vendor relationships and the capabilities needed to succeed.

    This research walks you through how to assess your capabilities to undertake a new model of vendor relationships and drive exponential IT.

    • Manage Exponential Value Relationships Storyboard

    2. Exponential Relationships Readiness Assessment – Assess your readiness to engage in exponential vendor partnerships.

    This tool will facilitate your readiness assessment.

    • Exponential Relationships Readiness Assessment
    [infographic]

    Further reading

    Manage Exponential Value Relationships

    Are you ready to manage outcome-based agreements?

    Analyst Perspective

    Outcome-based agreements require a higher degree of mutual trust.

    Kim Osborne Rodriguez

    Exponential IT brings with it an exciting new world of cutting-edge technology and increasingly accelerated growth of business and IT. But adopting and driving change through this paradigm requires new capabilities to grow impactful and meaningful partnerships with external vendors who can help implement technologies like artificial intelligence and virtual reality.

    Building outcome-based partnerships involves working very closely with vendors who, in many cases, will have just as much to lose as the organizations implementing these new technologies. This requires a greater degree of trust between parties than a standard vendor relationship. It also drastically increases the risks to both organizations; as each loses some control over data and outcomes, they must trust that the other organization will follow through on commitments and obligations.

    Outcome-based partnerships build upon traditional vendor management practices and create the potential for organizations to embrace emerging technology in new ways.

    Kim Osborne Rodriguez
    Research Director, CIO Advisory
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive Summary

    Exponential IT drives change

    Vendor relationships must evolve

    To deliver exponential value

    Implementing exponential IT will require businesses to work with external vendors to facilitate the rapid adoption of cutting-edge technologies such as generative artificial intelligence. IT leaders must:

    • Build strategic relationships with external entities to support the autonomization of the enterprise.
    • Procure, operate, and manage contracts and performance in outcome-based relationships.
    • Build relationships with new vendors.

    These challenges require new skills which build trust and collaboration with vendors.

    Traditional vendor management approaches are still important for organizations to develop and maintain. But exponential relationships bring new challenges:

    • A shift from managing technology service agreements to managing business capability agreements
    • Increased vendor access to intellectual property, confidential information, and customers

    IT leaders must adapt traditional vendor management capabilities to successfully lead this change.

    Outcome-based relationships should not be undertaken lightly as they can significantly impact the risk profile of the organization. Use this research to:

    • Assess your foundational vendor management capabilities as well as the transformative capabilities you need to manage outcome-based relationships.
    • Identify where you need to build your capabilities in order to successfully manage relationships.
    • Successfully manage outcomes, financials, risk, and relationships in complex vendor partnerships.

    Exponential value relationships will help drive exponential IT and autonomization of the enterprise.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Outcome-based partnerships require a higher degree of trust than traditional vendor relationships. Build trust by sharing risks and rewards.

    Vendor relationships can be worth billions of dollars

    Positive vendor relationships directly impact the bottom line, sometimes to the tune of billions of dollars annually.

    • Organizations typically spend 40% to 80% of their total budget on external suppliers.
    • Greater supplier trust translates directly to greater business profits, even in traditional vendor relationships.1
    • Based on over a decade of data from vehicle manufacturers, greater supplier relationships nearly doubled the unit profit margin on vehicles, contributing over $20 billion to Toyota’s annual profits based on typical sales volume.2
    • Having positive vendor relationships can be instrumental in times of crisis – when scarcity looms, vendors often choose to support their best customers.3,4 For example, Toyota protected itself from the losses many original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) faced in 2020 and showed improved profitability that year due to increased demand for vehicles which it was able to supply as a result of top-ranked vendor relationships.
    1 PR Newswire, 2022.
    2 Based on 10 years of data comparing Toyota and Nissan, every 1-point increase in the company’s Working Relations Index was correlated with a $15.77 net profit increase per unit. Impact on Toyota annual profits is based on 10.5 million units sold in 2021 and 2022.
    3 Interview with Renee Stanley, University of Texas at Arlington. Conducted 17 May 2023.
    4 Plante Moran, 2020.

    Supplier Trust Impacts OEM Profitability

    Sources: Macrotrends, Plante Moran 2022, Nissan 2022 and 2023, and Toyota 2022. Profit per car is based on total annual profit divided by total annual sales volume.

    Outcome-based relationships are a new paradigm

    In a new model where organizations are procuring autonomous capabilities, outcomes will govern vendor relationships.

    An outcome-based relationship requires a higher level of mutual trust than traditional vendor relationships. This requires shared reward and shared risk.

    Don’t forget about traditional vendor management relationships! Not all vendor relationships can (or should) be outcome-based.

    Managing Exponential Value Relationships.

    Case study

    INDUSTRY: Technology

    SOURCE: Press Release

    Microsoft and OpenAI partner on Azure, Teams, and Microsoft Office suite

    In January 2023, Microsoft announced a $10 billion investment in OpenAI, allowing OpenAI to continue scaling its flagship large language model, ChatGPT, and giving Microsoft first access to deploy OpenAI’s products in services like GitHub, Microsoft Office, and Microsoft Teams.

    Shared risk

    Issues with OpenAI’s platforms could have a debilitating effect on Microsoft’s own reputation – much like Google’s $100 billion stock loss following a blunder by its AI platform Bard – not to mention the financial loss if the platform does not live up to the hype.

    Shared reward

    This was a particularly important strategic move by Microsoft, as its main competitors develop their own AI models in a race to the top. This investment also gave OpenAI the resources to continue scaling and evolving its services much faster than it would be capable of on its own. If OpenAI’s products succeed, there is a significant upside for both companies.

    The image contains a graph that demonstrates time to reach 1 million users.

    Adapt your approach to vendor relationships

    Both traditional vendors and exponential relationships are important.

    Traditional

    procurement

    Vendor

    management

    Exponential vendor relationships

    • Ideal for procuring a product or service
    • Typically evaluates vendors based on their capabilities and track record of success
    • Focuses on metrics, KPIs, and contracts to deliver success to the organization purchasing the product or service
    • Vendors typically only have access to company data showing what is required to deliver their product or service
    • Ideal for managing vendors supplying products or services
    • Typically evaluates vendors based on the value and the criticality of a vendor to drive VM-resource allocation
    • External vendors do not generally participate in sharing of risks or rewards outside of payment for services or incentives/penalties
    • Vendors typically have limited access to company data
    • Ideal for procuring an autonomous capability
    • Typically evaluated based on the total possible value creation for both parties
    • External vendors share in substantial portions of the risks and rewards of the relationship
    • Vendors typically have significant access to company data, including proprietary methods, intellectual property, and customer lists

    Use this research to successfully
    manage outcome-based relationships.

    Use Info-Tech’s research to Jump Start Your Vendor Management Initiative.

    Common obstacles

    Exponential relationships require new approaches to vendor management as businesses autonomize:

    • Autonomization refers to the shift toward autonomous business capabilities which leverage technologies such as AI and quantum computing to operate independently of human interaction.
    • The speed and complexity of technology advancement requires that businesses move quickly and confidently to develop strong relationships and deliver value.
    • We are seeing businesses shift from procuring products and services to procuring autonomous business capabilities (sometimes called “as a service,” or aaS). This shift can drive exponential value but also increases complexity and risk.
    • Exponential IT requires a shift in emphasis toward more mature relationship and risk management strategies, compared to traditional vendor management.

    The shift from technology service agreements to business capability agreements needs a new approach

    Eighty-seven percent of organizations are currently experiencing talent shortages or expect to within a few years.

    Source: McKinsey, “Mind the [skills] gap”, 2021.

    Sixty-three percent of IT leaders plan to implement AI in their organizations by the end of 2023.

    Source: Info-Tech Research Group survey, 2022

    Insight summary

    Build trust

    Successfully managing exponential relationships requires increased trust and the ability to share both risks and rewards. Outcome-based vendors typically have greater access to intellectual property, customer data, and proprietary methods, which can pose a risk to the organization if this information is used to benefit competitors. Build mutual trust by sharing both risks and rewards.

    Manage risk

    Outcome-based relationships with external vendors can drastically affect an organization’s risk profile. Carefully consider third-party risk and shared risk, including ESG risk, as well as the business risk of losing control over capabilities and assets. Qualified risk specialists (such as legal, regulatory, contract, intellectual property law) should be consulted before entering outcome-based relationships.

    Drive outcomes

    Fostering strategic relationships can be instrumental in times of crisis, when being the customer of choice for key vendors can push your organization up the line from the vendor’s side – but be careful about relying on this too much. Vendor objectives may not align with yours, and in the end, everyone needs to protect themselves.

    Assess your readiness for exponential value relationships

    Key deliverable:

    Exponential Relationships Readiness Assessment

    Determine your readiness to build exponential value relationships.

    Measure the value of this blueprint

    Save thousands of dollars by leveraging this research to assess your readiness, before you lose millions from a relationship gone bad.

    Our research indicates that most organizations would take months to prepare this type of assessment without using our research. That’s over 80 person-hours spent researching and gathering data to support due diligence, for a total cost of thousands of dollars. Doesn’t your staff have better things to do?

    Start by answering a few brief questions, then return to this slide at the end to see how much your answers have changed.

    Establish Baseline Metrics

    Use Info-Tech’s research to Exponential Relationships Readiness Assessment.

    Estimated time commitment without Info-Tech’s research (person-hours)

    Establish a baseline

    Gauge the effectiveness of this research by asking yourself the following questions before and after completing your readiness assessment:

    Questions

    Before

    After

    To what extent are you satisfied with your current vendor management approach?

    How many of your current vendors would you describe as being of strategic importance?

    How much do you spend on vendors annually?

    How much value do you derive from your vendor relationships annually?

    Do you have a vendor management strategy?

    What outcomes are you looking to achieve through your vendor relationships?

    How well do you understand the core capabilities needed to drive successful vendor management?

    How well do you understand your current readiness to engage in outcome-based vendor relationships?

    Do you feel comfortable managing the risks when working with organizations to implement artificial intelligence and other autonomous capabilities?

    How to use this research

    Five tips to get the most out of your readiness assessment.

    1. Each category consists of five competencies, with a maximum of five points each. The maximum score on this assessment is 100 points.
    2. Effectiveness levels range from basic (level 1) to advanced (level 5). Level 1 is generally considered the baseline for most effectively operating organizations. If your organization is struggling with level 1 competencies, it is recommended to improve maturity in those areas before pursuing exponential relationships.
    3. This assessment is qualitative; complete the assessment to the best of your ability, based on the scoring rubric provided. If you fall between levels, use the lower one in your assessment.
    4. The scoring rubric may not perfectly fit the processes and practices within every organization. Consider the spirit of the description and score accordingly.
    5. Other industry- and region-specific competencies may be required to succeed at exponential relationships. The competencies in this assessment are a starting point, and internal validation and assessments should be conducted to uncover additional competencies and skills.

    Financial management

    Manage your budget and spending to stay on track throughout your relationship.

    “Most organizations underestimate the amount of time, money, and skill required to build and maintain a successful relationship with another organization. The investment in exponential relationships is exponential in itself – as are the returns.”

    – Jennifer Perrier, Principal Research Director,
    Info-Tech Research Group

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Executive leadership team, including CIO
    • CFO
    • Vendor management leader
    • Other internal stakeholders of vendor relationships

    Activities:

    • Assess your ability to manage scope and budget in exponential IT relationships.

    Successfully manage complex finances

    Stay on track and keep your relationship running smoothly.

    Why is this important?

    • Finance is at the core of most business – it drives decision making, acts as a constraint for innovation and optimization, and plays a key role in assessing options (such as return on investment or payback period).
    • Effectively managing finances is a critical success factor in developing strong relationships. Each organization must be able to manage their own budget and spending in order to balance the risk and reward in the relationship. Often, these risks and rewards will come in the form of profit and loss or revenue and spend.

    Build it into your practice:

    1. Ensure your financial decision-making practices are aligned with the organizational and relationship strategy. Do metrics and criteria reflect the organization’s goals?
    2. Develop strong accounting and financial analysis practices – this includes the ability to conduct financial due diligence on potential vendors.
    3. Develop consistent methodology to track and report on the desired outcomes on a regular basis.

    Build your ability to manage finances

    The five competencies needed to manage finances in exponential value relationships are:

    Budget procedures

    Financial alignment

    Adaptability

    Financial analysis

    Reporting & compliance

    Clearly articulate and communicate budgets, with proactive analysis and reporting.

    There is a strong, direct alignment between financial outcomes and organizational strategy and goals.

    Financial structures can manage many different types of relationships and structures without major overhaul.

    Proactive financial analysis is conducted regularly, with actionable insights.

    This exceeds legal requirements and includes proactive and actionable reporting.

    Relationship management

    Drive exponential value by becoming a customer of choice.

    “The more complex the business environment becomes — for instance, as new technologies emerge or as innovation cycles get faster — the more such relationships make sense. And the better companies get at managing individual relationships, the more likely it is that they will become “partners of choice” and be able to build entire portfolios of practical and value-creating partnerships.”

    (“Improving the management of complex business partnerships.” McKinsey, 2019)

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Executive leadership team, including CIO
    • Vendor management leader
    • Other internal stakeholders of vendor relationships

    Activities:

    • Assess your ability to manage relationships in exponential IT relationships.

    Take your relationships to the next level

    Maintaining positive relationships is key to building trust.

    Why is this important?

    • All relationships will experience challenges, and the ability to resolve these issues will rely heavily on the relationship management skills and soft skills of the leadership within each organization.
    • Based on a 20-year study of vendor relationships in the automotive sector, business-to-business trust is a function of reasonable demands, follow-through, and information sharing.
    (Source: Plante Moran, 2020)

    Build it into your practice:

    1. Develop the soft skills necessary to promote psychological safety, growth mindset, and strong and open communication channels.
    2. Be smart about sharing information – you don’t need to share everything, but being open about relevant information will enhance trust.
    3. Both parties need to work hard to develop trust necessary to build a true relationship. This will require increased access to decision-makers, clearly defined guardrails, and the ability for unsatisfied parties to leave.

    Build your ability to manage relationships

    The five competencies needed to manage relationships in exponential partnerships are:

    Strategic alignment

    Follow-through

    Information sharing

    Shared risk & rewards

    Communication

    Work with vendors to create roadmaps and strategies to drive mutual success.

    Ensure demands are reasonable and consistently follow through on commitments.

    Proactively and freely share relevant information between parties.

    Equitably share responsibility for outcomes and benefits from success.

    Ensure clear, proactive, and frequent communication occurs between parties.

    Performance management

    Outcomes management focuses on results, not methods.

    According to Jennifer Robinson, senior editor at Gallup, “This approach focuses people and teams on a concrete result, not the process required to achieve it. Leaders define outcomes and, along with managers, set parameters and guidelines. Employees, then, have a high degree of autonomy to use their own unique talents to reach goals their own way.” (Forbes, 2023)

    In the context of exponential relationships, vendors can be given a high degree of autonomy provided they meet their objectives.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Executive leadership team, including CIO
    • Vendor management leader
    • Other internal stakeholders of vendor relationships

    Activities:

    • Assess your ability to manage outcomes in exponential IT relationships.

    Manage outcomes to drive mutual success

    Build trust by achieving shared objectives.

    Why is this important?

    • Relationships are based on shared risk and shared reward for all parties. In order to effectively communicate the shared rewards, you must first understand and communicate your objectives for the relationship, then measure outcomes to ensure all parties are benefiting.
    • Effectively managing outcomes reduces the risk that one party will choose to leave based on a perception of benefits not being achieved. Parties may still leave the agreement, but decisions should be based on shared facts and issues should be communicated and addressed early.

    Build it into your practice:

    1. Clearly articulate what you hope to achieve by entering an outcome-based relationship. Each party should outline and agree to the goals, objectives, and desired outcomes from the relationship.
    2. Document how rewards will be shared among parties. What type of rewards are anticipated? Who will benefit and how?
    3. Develop consistent methodology to track and report on the desired outcomes on a regular basis. This might consist of a vendor scorecard or a monthly meeting.

    Build your ability to manage outcomes

    The five competencies needed to manage outcomes in exponential value relationships are:

    Goal setting

    Negotiation

    Performance tracking

    Issue
    resolution

    Scope management

    Set specific, measurable and actionable goals, and communicate them with stakeholders.

    Clearly articulate and agree upon measurable outcomes between all parties.

    Proactively track progress toward goals/outcomes and discuss results with vendors regularly.

    Openly discuss potential issues and challenges on a regular basis. Find collaborative solutions to problems.

    Proactively manage scope and discuss with vendors on a regular basis.

    Risk management

    Exponential IT means exponential risk – and exponential rewards.

    One of the key differentiators between traditional vendor relationships and exponential relationships is the degree to which risk is shared between parties. This is not possible in all industries, which may limit companies’ ability to participate in this type of exponential relationship.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Executive leadership team, including CIO
    • Vendor management leader
    • Risk management leader
    • Other internal stakeholders of vendor relationships

    Activities:

    • Assess your ability to manage risk in exponential IT relationships.

    Relationships come with a lot of hidden risks

    Successfully managing complex risks can be the difference between a spectacular success and company-ending failure.

    Why is this important?

    • Relationships inherently involve a loss of control. You are relying on another party to fulfill their part of the agreement, and you depend on the success of the outcome. Loss of control comes with significant risks.
    • Sharing in risk is what differentiates an outcome-based relationship from a traditional vendor relationship; vendors must have skin in the game.
    • Organizations must consider many different types of risk when considering a relationship with a vendor: fraud, security, human rights, labor relations, ESG, and operational risks. Remember that risk is not inherently bad; some risk is necessary.

    Build it into your practice:

    1. Build or hire the necessary risk expertise needed to properly assess and evaluate the risks of potential vendor relationships. This includes intellectual property, ESG, legal/regulatory, cybersecurity, data security, and more.
    2. Develop processes and procedures which clearly communicate and report on risk on a regular basis.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Some highly regulated industries (such as finance) are prevented from transferring certain types of risk. In these industries, it may be much more difficult to form vendor relationships.

    Don’t forget about third-party ESG risk

    Customers care about ESG. You should too.

    Protect yourself against third-party ESG risks by considering the environmental and social impacts of your vendors.

    Third-party ESG risks can include the following:

    • Environmental risk: Vendors with unsustainable practices such as carbon emissions or waste generation of natural resource depletion can negatively impact the organization’s environmental goals.
    • Social risk: Unsafe or illegal labor practices, human rights violations, and supply chain management issues can reflect negatively on organizations that choose to work with vendors who engage in such practices.
    • Governance risk: Vendors who engage in illegal or unethical behaviors, including bribery and corruption or data and privacy breaches can impact downstream customers.

    Working with vendors that have a poor record of ESG carries a very real reputational risk for organizations who do not undertake appropriate due diligence.

    A global survey of nearly 14,000 customers revealed that…

    Source: EY Future Consumer Index, 2021

    Seventy-seven percent of customers believe companies have a responsibility to manufacture sustainably.

    Sixty-eight percent of customers believe businesses should ensure their suppliers meet high social and environmental standards.

    Fifty-five percent of customers consider the environmental impact of production in their purchasing decisions.

    Build your ability to manage risk

    The five competencies needed to manage risk in exponential value relationships are:

    Third-party risk

    Value chain

    Data management

    Regulatory & compliance

    Monitoring & reporting

    Understand and assess third-party risk, including ESG risk, in potential relationships.

    Assess risk throughout the value chain for all parties and balance risk among parties.

    Proactively assess and manage potential data risks, including intellectual property and strategic data.

    Manage regulatory and compliance risks, including understanding risk transfer and ultimate risk holder.

    Proactive and open monitoring and reporting of risks, including regular communication among stakeholders.

    Contract management

    Contract management is a critical part of vendor management.

    Well-managed contracts include clearly defined pricing, performance-based outcomes, clear roles and responsibilities, and appropriate remedies for failure to meet requirements. In outcome-based relationships, contracts are generally used as a secondary method of enforcing performance, with relationship management being the primary method of addressing challenges and ensuring performance.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Executive leadership team, including CIO
    • Vendor management leader
    • Risk management leader
    • Other internal stakeholders of vendor relationships

    Activities:

    • Assess your ability to manage risk in exponential IT relationships.

    Build your ability to manage contracts

    The five competencies needed to manage contracts in exponential value relationships are:

    Pricing

    Performance outcomes

    Roles and responsibilities

    Remedies

    Payment

    Pricing is clearly defined in contracts so that the total cost is understood including all fees, optional pricing, and set caps on increases.

    Contracts are performance-based whenever possible, including deliverables, milestones, service levels, due dates, and outcomes.

    Each party's roles and responsibilities are clearly defined in the contract documents with adequate detail.

    Contracts contain appropriate remedies for a vendor's failure to meet SLAs, due dates, and other obligations.

    Payment is made after performance targets are met, approved, or accepted.

    Activity 1: Assess your readiness for exponential relationships

    1-3 hours

    1. Gather key stakeholders from across your organization to participate in the readiness assessment exercise.
    2. As a group, review the core competencies from the previous four sections and determine where your organization’s effectiveness lies for each competency. Record your responses in the Exponential Relationships Readiness Assessment tool.

    Download the Exponential Relationships Readiness Assessment tool.

    Input Output
    • Core competencies
    • Knowledge of internal processes and capabilities
    • Readiness assessment
    Materials Participants
    • Exponential
      Relationships Readiness Assessment
      tool
    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • Executive leadership team, including CIO
    • Vendor management leader
    • Other internal stakeholders of vendor relationships

    Understand your assessment

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Executive leadership team, including CIO
    • Vendor management leader
    • Other internal stakeholders of vendor relationships

    Activities:

    • Create an action plan.

    Understand the results of your assessment

    Consider the following recommendations based on your readiness assessment scores:

    • The chart to the right shows sample results. The bars indicate the recommended scores, and the line indicates the readiness score.
    • Three or more categories below the recommended scores, or any categories more than five points below the recommendation: outcome-based relationships are not recommended at this time.
    • Two or more categories below the recommended scores: Proceed with caution and limit outcome-based relationships to low-risk areas. Continue to mature capabilities.
    • One category below the recommended scores: Evaluate the risks and benefits before engaging in higher-risk vendor relationships. Continue to mature capabilities.
    • All categories at or above the recommended scores: You have many of the core capabilities needed to succeed at exponential relationships! Continue to evaluate and refine your vendor relationships strategy, and identify any additional competencies needed based on your industry or region.

    Acme Corp Exponential Relationships Readiness.

    Activity 2: Create an action plan

    1 hour

    1. Gather the stakeholders who participated in the readiness assessment exercise.
    2. As a group, review the results of the readiness assessment. Where there any surprise? Do the results reflect your understanding of the organization’s maturity?
    3. Determine which areas are likely to limit the organization’s relationship capability, based on lowest scoring areas and relative importance to the organization.
    4. Break out into groups and have each group identify three actions the organization could take to mature the lowest scoring areas.
    5. Bring the group back together and prioritize the actions. Note who will be accountable for each next step.
    InputOutput
    • Readiness assessment
    • Action plan to improve maturity of capabilities
    MaterialsParticipants
    • Exponential
      Relationship Readiness Assessment
      tool
    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • Executive leadership team, including CIO
    • Vendor management leader
    • Other internal stakeholders of vendor relationships

    Related Info-Tech Research

    Jump Start Your Vendor Management Initiative
    Create and implement a vendor management framework to begin obtaining measurable results in 90 days.

    Elevate Your Vendor Management Initiative
    Transform your VMI from tactical to strategic to maximize its impact and value

    Evaluate Your Vendor Account Team to Optimize Vendor Relations
    Understand the value of knowing your account team’s influence in the organization, and your influence, to drive results.

    Related Info-Tech Research

    Build an IT Risk Management Program
    Mitigate the IT risks that could negatively impact your organization.

    Build an IT Budget
    Effective IT budgets are more than a spreadsheet. They tell a story.

    Adopt an Exponential IT Mindset
    Thrive through the next paradigm shift..

    Author

    Kim Osborne Rodriguez

    Kim Osborne Rodriguez
    Research Director, CIO Advisory
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Kim is a professional engineer and Registered Communications Distribution Designer (RCDD) with over a decade of experience in management and engineering consulting spanning healthcare, higher education, and commercial sectors. She has worked on some of the largest hospital construction projects in Canada, from early visioning and IT strategy through to design, specifications, and construction administration. She brings a practical and evidence-based approach, with a track record of supporting successful projects.

    Kim holds a Bachelor’s degree in Honours Mechatronics Engineering and an option in Management Sciences from the University of Waterloo.

    Research Contributors and Experts

    Jack Hakimian

    Jack Hakimian
    Senior Vice President
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Jack has more than 25 years of technology and management consulting experience. He has served multibillion-dollar organizations in multiple industries including financial services and telecommunications. Jack also served several large public sector institutions.

    He is a frequent speaker and panelist at technology and innovation conferences and events and holds a Master’s degree in Computer Engineering as well as an MBA from the ESCP-EAP European School of Management.

    Michael Tweedie

    Michael Tweedie
    Practice Lead, CIO Strategy
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Mike Tweedie brings over 25 years as a technology executive. He’s led several large transformation projects across core infrastructure, application and IT services as the head of Technology at ADP Canada. He was also the Head of Engineering and Service Offerings for a large French IT services firm, focused on cloud adoption and complex ERP deployment and management.

    Mike holds a Bachelor’s degree in Architecture from Ryerson University.

    Scott Bickley

    Scott Bickley
    Practice Lead, VCCO
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Scott Bickley is a Practice Lead & Principal Research Director at Info-Tech Research Group, focused on Vendor Management and Contract Review. He also has experience in the areas of IT Asset Management (ITAM), Software Asset Management (SAM), and technology procurement along with a deep background in operations, engineering, and quality systems management.

    Scott holds a B.S. in Justice Studies from Frostburg State University. He also holds active IAITAM certification designations of CSAM and CMAM and is a Certified Scrum Master (SCM).

    Donna Bales

    Donna Bales
    Principal Research Director
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Donna Bales is a Principal Research Director in the CIO Practice at Info-Tech Research Group, specializing in research and advisory services in IT risk, governance, and compliance. She brings over 25 years of experience in strategic consulting and product development and has a history of success in leading complex, multistakeholder industry initiatives.

    Donna has a bachelor’s degree in economics from the University of Western Ontario.

    Research Contributors and Experts

    Jennifer Perrier

    Jennifer Perrier
    Principal Research Director
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Jennifer has 25 years of experience in the information technology and human resources research space, joining Info-Tech in 1998 as the first research analyst with the company. Over the years, she has served as a research analyst and research manager, as well as in a range of roles leading the development and delivery of offerings across Info-Tech’s product and service portfolio, including workshops and the launch of industry roundtables and benchmarking. She was also Research Lead for McLean & Company, the HR advisory division of Info-Tech, during its start-up years.

    Jennifer’s research expertise spans the areas of IT strategic planning, governance, policy and process management, people management, leadership, organizational change management, performance benchmarking, and cross-industry IT comparative analysis. She has produced and overseen the development of hundreds of publications across the full breadth of both the IT and HR domains in multiple industries. In 2022, Jennifer joined Info-Tech’s IT Financial Management Practice with a focus on developing financial transparency to foster meaningful dialogue between IT and its stakeholders and drive better technology investment decisions.

    Phil Bode

    Phil Bode
    Principal Research Director
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Phil has 30+ years of experience with IT procurement-related topics: contract drafting and review, negotiations, RFXs, procurement processes, and vendor management. Phil has been a frequent speaker at conferences, a contributor to magazine articles in CIO Magazine and ComputerWorld, and quoted in many other magazines. He is a co-author of the book The Art of Creating a Quality RFP.

    Phil has a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration with a double major of Finance and Entrepreneurship and a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration with a major of Accounting, both from the University of Arizona.

    Research Contributors

    Erin Morgan

    Erin Morgan
    Assistant Vice President, IT Administration
    University of Texas at Arlington

    Renee Stanley

    Renee Stanley
    Assistant Director IT Procurement and Vendor Management
    University of Texas at Arlington

    Note: Additional contributors did not wish to be identified.

    Bibliography

    Andrea, Dave. “Plante Moran’s 2022 Working Relations Index® (WRI) Study shows supplier relations can improve amid industry crisis.” Plante Moran, 25 Aug 2022. Accessed 18 May 2023.
    Andrea, Dave. “Trust between suppliers and OEMs can better prepare you for the next crisis.” Plante Moran, 9 Sept 2020. Accessed 17 May 2023.
    Cleary, Shannon, and Carolan McLarney. “Organizational Benefits of an Effective Vendor Management Strategy.” IUP Journal of Supply Chain Management, Vol. 16, Issue 4, Dec 2019.
    De Backer, Ruth, and Eileen Kelly Rinaudo. “Improving the management of complex business partnerships.” McKinsey, 21 March 2019. Accessed 9 May 2023 .
    Dennean, Kevin et al. “Let's chat about ChatGPT.” UBS, 22 Feb 2023. Accessed 26 May 2023.
    F&I Tools. “Nissan Worldwide Vehicle Sales Report.” Factory Warranty List, 2022. Accessed 18 May 2023.
    Gomez, Robin. “Adopting ChatGPT and Generative AI in Retail Customer Service.” Radial, 235, April 2023. Accessed 10 May 2023.
    Harms, Thomas and Kristina Rogers. “How collaboration can drive value for you, your partners and the planet.” EY, 26 Oct 2021. Accessed 10 May 2023.
    Hedge & Co. “Toyota, Honda finish 1-2; General Motors finishes at 3rd in annual Supplier Working Relations Study.” PR Newswire, 23 May 2022. Accessed 17 May 2023.
    Henke Jr, John W., and T. Thomas. "Lost supplier trust, lost profits." Supply Chain Management Review, May 2014. Accessed 17 May 2023.
    Information Services Group, Inc. “Global Demand for IT and Business Services Continues Upward Surge in Q2, ISG Index™ Finds.” BusinessWire, 7 July 2021. Accessed 8 May 2023.
    Kasanoff, Bruce. “New Study Reveals Costs Of Bad Supplier Relationships.” Forbes, 6 Aug 2014. Accessed 17 May 2023.
    Macrotrends. “Nissan Motor Gross Profit 2010-2022.” Macrotrends. Accessed 18 May 2023.
    Macrotrends. “Toyota Gross Profit 2010-2022.” Macrotrends. Accessed 18 May 2023.
    McKinsey. “Mind the [skills] gap.” McKinsey, 27 Jan 2021. Accessed 18 May 2023.
    Morgan, Blake. “7 Examples of How Digital Transformation Impacted Business Performance.” Forbes, 21 Jul 2019. Accessed 10 May 2023.
    Nissan Motor Corporation. “Nissan reports strong financial results for fiscal year 2022.” Nissan Global Newsroom, 11 May 2023. Accessed 18 May 2023.

    Bibliography

    “OpenAI and Microsoft extend partnership.” Open AI, 23 Jan 2023. Accessed 26 May 2023.
    Pearson, Bryan. “The Apple Of Its Aisles: How Best Buy Lured One Of The Biggest Brands.“ Forbes, 23 Apr 2015. Accessed 23 May 2023.
    Perifanis, Nikolaos-Alexandros and Fotis Kitsios. “Investigating the Influence of Artificial Intelligence on Business Value in the Digital Era of Strategy: A Literature Review.” Information, 2 Feb 2023. Accessed 10 May 2023.
    Scott, Tim and Nathan Spitse. “Third-party risk is becoming a first priority challenge.” Deloitte. Accessed 18 May 2023.
    Stanley, Renee. Interview by Kim Osborne Rodriguez, 17 May 2023.
    Statista. “Toyota's retail vehicle sales from 2017 to 2021.” Statista, 27 Jul 2022. Accessed 18 May 2023.
    Tlili, Ahmed, et al. “What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education.” Smart Learning Environments, 22 Feb 2023. Accessed 9 May 2023.
    Vitasek, Kate. “Outcome-Based Management: What It Is, Why It Matters And How To Make It Happen.” Forbes, 12 Jan 2023. Accessed 9 May 2023.

    Build a Data Pipeline for Reporting and Analytics

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}126|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.3/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $61,999 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 20 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Data Management
    • Parent Category Link: /data-management
    • Continuous and disruptive database design updates while trying to have one design pattern to fit all use cases.
    • Sub-par performance while loading, retrieving, and querying data.
    • You want to shorten time-to-market of the projects aimed at data delivery and consumption.
    • Unnecessarily complicated database design limits usability of the data and requires knowledge of specific data structures for their effective use.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Evolve your data architecture. Data pipeline is an evolutionary break away from the enterprise data warehouse methodology.
    • Avoid endless data projects. Building centralized all-in-one enterprise data warehouses takes forever to deliver a positive ROI.
    • Facilitate data self-service. Use-case optimized data delivery repositories facilitate data self-service.

    Impact and Result

    • Understand your high-level business capabilities and interactions across them – your data repositories and flows should be just a digital reflection thereof.
    • Divide your data world in logical verticals overlaid with various speed data progression lanes, i.e. build your data pipeline – and conquer it one segment at a time.
    • Use the most appropriate database design pattern for a given phase/component in your data pipeline progression.

    Build a Data Pipeline for Reporting and Analytics Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Build your data pipeline using the most appropriate data design patterns.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Understand data progression

    Identify major business capabilities, business processes running inside and across them, and datasets produced or used by these business processes and activities performed thereupon.

    • Build a Data Pipeline for Reporting and Analytics – Phase 1: Understand Data Progression

    2. Identify data pipeline components

    Identify data pipeline vertical zones: data creation, accumulation, augmentation, and consumption, as well as horizontal lanes: fast, medium, and slow speed.

    • Build a Data Pipeline for Reporting and Analytics – Phase 2: Identify Data Pipeline Components

    3. Select data design patterns

    Select the right data design patterns for the data pipeline components, as well as an applicable data model industry standard (if available).

    • Build a Data Pipeline for Reporting and Analytics – Phase 3: Select Data Design Patterns
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Build a Data Pipeline for Reporting and Analytics

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Understand Data Progression

    The Purpose

    Identify major business capabilities, business processes running inside and across them, and datasets produced or used by these business processes and activities performed thereupon.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Indicates the ownership of datasets and the high-level data flows across the organization.

    Activities

    1.1 Review & discuss typical pitfalls (and their causes) of major data management initiatives.

    1.2 Discuss the main business capabilities of the organization and how they interact.

    1.3 Discuss the business processes running inside and across business capabilities and the datasets involved.

    1.4 Create the Enterprise Business Process Model (EBPM).

    Outputs

    Understanding typical pitfalls (and their causes) of major data management initiatives.

    Business capabilities map

    Business processes map

    Enterprise Business Process Model (EBPM)

    2 Identify Data Pipeline Components

    The Purpose

    Identify data pipeline vertical zones: data creation, accumulation, augmentation, and consumption, as well as horizontal lanes: fast, medium, and slow speed.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Design the high-level data progression pipeline.

    Activities

    2.1 Review and discuss the concept of a data pipeline in general, as well as the vertical zones: data creation, accumulation, augmentation, and consumption.

    2.2 Identify these zones in the enterprise business model.

    2.3 Review and discuss multi-lane data progression.

    2.4 Identify different speed lanes in the enterprise business model.

    Outputs

    Understanding of a data pipeline design, including its zones.

    EBPM mapping to Data Pipeline Zones

    Understanding of multi-lane data progression

    EBPM mapping to Multi-Speed Data Progression Lanes

    3 Develop the Roadmap

    The Purpose

    Select the right data design patterns for the data pipeline components, as well as an applicable data model industry standard (if available).

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Use of appropriate data design pattern for each zone with calibration on the data progression speed.

    Activities

    3.1 Review and discuss various data design patterns.

    3.2 Discuss and select the data design pattern selection for data pipeline components.

    3.3 Discuss applicability of data model industry standards (if available).

    Outputs

    Understanding of various data design patterns.

    Data Design Patterns mapping to the data pipeline.

    Selection of an applicable data model from available industry standards.

    2021 IT Talent Trend Report

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}516|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 10.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $9,919 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 2 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Lead
    • Parent Category Link: /lead
    • In March 2020, many organizations were forced to switch to a virtual working world. IT enabled organizations to be successful while working from home. Ultimately, this shift changed the way that we all work, and in turn, the way IT leaders manage talent.
    • Many organizations are considering long-term remote work (Kelly, 2020).
    • Change is starting but is lagging.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Increase focus on employee experience to navigate new challenges.
    • A good employee experience is what is best for the IT department.

    Impact and Result

    • The data shows IT is changing in the area of talent management.
    • IT has a large role in enabling organizations to work from home, especially from a technological and logistics perspective. There is evidence to show that they are now expanding their role to better support employees when working from home.
    • Survey respondents identified efforts already underway for IT to improve employee experience and subsequently, IT effectiveness.

    2021 IT Talent Trend Report Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should focus on the employee experience and get an overview of what successful IT leaders are doing differently heading into 2021 – the five new talent management trends.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. DEI: A top talent objective

    The focus on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives spans the entire organization beyond just HR. Learn which DEI efforts are underway with IT.

    • 2021 IT Talent Trend Report – Trend 1: DEI: A Top Talent Objective

    2. Remote work is here to stay

    Forced work-from-home demonstrated to organizations that employees can be productive while working away from the physical office. Learn more about how remote work is changing work.

    • 2021 IT Talent Trend Report – Trend 2: Remote Work Is Here to Stay

    3. A greater emphasis on wellbeing

    When the pandemic hit, organizations were significantly concerned about how employees were doing. Learn more about wellbeing.

    • 2021 IT Talent Trend Report – Trend 3: A Greater Emphasis on Wellbeing

    4. A shift in skills priorities

    Upskilling and finding sought after skills were challenging before the pandemic. How has it changed since? Learn more about skills priorities.

    • 2021 IT Talent Trend Report – Trend 4: A Shift in Skills Priorities

    5. Uncertainty unlocks performance

    The pandemic and remote work has affected performance. Learn about how uncertainty has impacted performance management.

    • 2021 IT Talent Trend Report – Trend 5: Uncertainty Unlocks Performance
    [infographic]

    How to build a Service Desk Chatbot POC

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}16|cart{/j2store}
    • Related Products: {j2store}16|crosssells{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.7/10
    • member rating average dollars saved: 11,197
    • member rating average days saved: 8
    • Parent Category Name: Service Desk
    • Parent Category Link: /service-desk

    The challenge

    Build a chatbot that creates value for your business

     

    • Ensure your chatbot meets your business needs.
    • Bring scalability to your customer service delivery in a cost-effective manner.
    • Measure your chatbot objectives with clear metrics.
    • Pre-determine your ticket categories to use during the proof of concept.

    Our advice

    Insight

    • Build your chatbot to create business value. Whether increasing service or resource efficiency, keep value creation in mind when making decisions with your proof of concept.

    Impact and results 

    • When implemented effectively, chatbots can help save costs, generate new revenue, and ultimately increase customer satisfaction for external and internal-facing customers.

    The roadmap

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you building a chatbot proof of concept is a good idea, review our methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you to successfully complete this project. Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    Start here

    Form your chatbot strategy.

    Build the right metrics to measure the success of your chatbot POC

    • Chatbot ROI Calculator (xls)
    • Chatbot POC Metrics Tool (xls)

    Build the foundation for your chatbot.

    Architect the chatbot to maximize business value

    • Chatbot Conversation Tree Library

    Continue to improve your chatbot.

    Now take your chatbot proof of concept to production

    • Chatbot POC RACI (doc)
    • Chatbot POC Implementation Roadmap (xls)
    • Chatbot POC Communication Plan (doc)Chatbot ROI Calculator (xls)

    Debunk Machine Learning Endpoint Security Solutions

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}168|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Endpoint Security
    • Parent Category Link: /endpoint-security
    • Threat actors are more innovative than ever before and developing sophisticated methods of endpoints attacks capable of avoiding detection with traditional legacy anti-virus software.
    • Legacy anti-virus solutions rely on signatures and hence fail at detecting memory objects, and new and mutating malware.
    • Combined with the cybersecurity talent gap and the sheer volume of endpoint attacks, organizations need endpoint security solutions capable of efficiently and accurately blocking never-before-seen malware types and variants.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Don’t make machine learning a goal in itself. Think of how machine learning can help you achieve your goals.
    • Determine your endpoint security requirements and goals prior to shopping around for a vendor. Vendors can easily suck you into a vortex of marketing jargon and sell you tools that your organization does not need.
    • Machine learning alone is not a solution to catching malware. It is a computational method that can generalize and analyze large datasets, and output insights quicker than a human security analyst.

    Impact and Result

    • Consider deploying an endpoint protection technology that leverages machine learning into your existing endpoint security strategy to counteract against the unknown and to quickly sift through the large volumes of data.
    • Understand how machine learning methods can help drive your organization’s security goals.
    • Identify vendors that utilize machine learning in their endpoint security products.
    • Understand use cases of where machine learning in endpoint security has been successful.

    Debunk Machine Learning Endpoint Security Solutions Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should consider machine learning in endpoint security solutions, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Demystify machine learning concepts

    Understand basic machine learning concepts used in endpoint security.

    • Debunk Machine Learning Endpoint Security Solutions – Phase 1: Demystify Machine Learning Concepts

    2. Evaluate vendors that leverage machine learning

    Determine feature requirements to evaluate vendors.

    • Debunk Machine Learning Endpoint Security Solutions – Phase 2: Evaluate Vendors That Leverage Machine Learning
    • Endpoint Protection Request for Proposal
    [infographic]

    The ESG Imperative and Its Impact on Organizations

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}196|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: IT Governance, Risk & Compliance
    • Parent Category Link: /it-governance-risk-and-compliance
    • Global regulatory climate disclosure requirements are still evolving and are not consistent.
    • Sustainability is becoming a corporate imperative, but IT’s role is not fully clear.
    • The environmental, social, and governance (ESG) data challenge is large and continually expanding in scope.
    • Collecting the necessary data and managing ethical issues across supply chains is a daunting task.
    • Communicating long-term value is difficult when customer and employee expectations are shifting.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • An organization's approach to ESG cannot be static or tactical. It is a moving landscape that requires a flexible, holistic approach across the organization. Cross-functional coordination is essential in order to be ready to respond to changing conditions.
    • Even though the ESG data requirements are large and continually expanding in scope, many organizations have well-established data frameworks and governance practices in place to meet regulatory obligations such as Sarbanes–Oxley that should used as a starting point.

    Impact and Result

    • Organizations will have greater success if they focus their ESG program efforts on the ESG factors that will have a material impact on their company performance and their key stakeholders.
    • Continually evaluating the evolving ESG landscape and its impact on key stakeholders will enable organizations to react quickly to changing conditions.
    • A successful ESG program requires a collaborative and integrated approach across key business stakeholders.
    • Delivering high-quality metrics and performance indicators requires a flexible and digital data approach, where possible, to enable data interoperability.

    The ESG Imperative and Its Impact on Organizations Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. The ESG Imperative and Its Impact on Organizations Deck – Learn why sustainability is becoming a key measurement of corporate performance and how to set your organization up for success.

    Understand the foundational components and drivers of the broader concept of sustainability: environmental, social, and governance (ESG) and IT’s roles within an organization’s ESG program. Learn about the functional business areas involved, the roles they play and how they interact with each other to drive program success.

    • The ESG Imperative and Its Impact on Organizations Storyboard

    Infographic

    Further reading

    The ESG Imperative and Its Impact on Organizations

    Design to enable an active response to changing conditions.

    Analyst Perspective

    Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) is a corporate imperative that is tied to long-term value creation. An organization's social license to operate and future corporate performance depends on managing ESG factors well.

    Central to an ESG program is having a good understanding of the ESG factors that may have a material impact on enterprise value and key internal and external stakeholders. A comprehensive ESG strategy supported by strong governance and risk management is also essential to success.

    Capturing relevant data and applying it within risk models, metrics, and internal and external reports is necessary for sharing your ESG story and measuring your progress toward meeting ESG commitments. Consequently, the data challenges have received a lot of attention, and IT leaders have a role to play as strategic partner and enabler to help address these challenges. However, ESG is more than a data challenge, and IT leaders need to consider the wider implications in managing third parties, selecting tools, developing supporting IT architecture, and ensuring ethical design.

    For many organizations, the ESG program journey has just begun, and collaboration between IT and risk, procurement, and compliance will be critical in shaping program success.

    This is a picture of Donna Bales, Principal Research Director, Info-Tech Research Group

    Donna Bales
    Principal Research Director
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    • Global regulatory climate disclosure requirements are still evolving and are not consistent.
    • Sustainability is becoming a corporate imperative, but IT's role is not fully clear.
    • The ESG data challenge is large and continually expanding in scope.
    • Collecting the necessary data and managing ethical issues across supply chains is a daunting task.
    • Communicating long-term value is difficult when customer and employee expectations are shifting.

    Common Obstacles

    • The data necessary for data-driven insights and accurate disclosure is often hampered by inaccurate and incomplete primary data.
    • Other challenges include:
      • Approaching ESG holistically and embedding it into existing governance, risk, and IT capabilities.
      • Building knowledge and adapting culture throughout all levels of the organization.
      • Monitoring stakeholder sentiment and keeping strategy aligned to expectations.

    Info-Tech's Approach

    • Use this blueprint to educate yourself on ESG factors and the broader concept of sustainability.
    • Learn about Info-Tech's ESG program approach and use it as a framework to begin your ESG program journey.
    • Identify changes that may be needed in your organizational operating model, strategy, governance, and risk management approach.
    • Discover areas of IT that may need to be prioritized and resourced.

    Info-Tech Insight

    An organization's approach to ESG cannot be static or tactical. ESG is a moving landscape that requires a flexible, holistic approach across the organization. It must become part of the way you work and enable an active response to changing conditions.

    This is an image of Info-Tech's thoughtmap for eight steps of the ESG Program Journey

    Putting ESG in context

    ESG has moved beyond the tipping point to corporate table stakes

    • In recent years, ESG issues have moved from voluntary initiatives driven by corporate responsibility teams to an enterprise-wide strategic imperative.
    • Organizations are no longer being measured by financial performance but by how they contribute to a sustainable and equitable future, such as how they support sustainable innovation through their business models and their focus on collaboration and inclusion.
    • A corporation's efforts toward sustainability is measured by three components: environmental, social, and governance.

    Sustainability

    The ability of a corporation and broader society to endure and survive over the long term by managing adverse impacts well and promoting positive opportunities.

    This is an image of the United Nation's 17 sustainable goals.

    Source: United Nations

    Putting "E," "S," and "G" in context

    Corporate sustainability depends on managing ESG factors well

    • Environmental, social, and governance are the component pieces of a sustainability framework that is used to understand and measure how an organization impacts or is affected by society as a whole.
    • Human activities, particularly fossil fuel burning since the mid twentieth century, have increased greenhouse gas concentration, resulting in observable changes to the atmosphere, ocean, cryosphere, and biosphere.
    • The E in ESG relates to the positive and negative impacts an organization may have on the environment, such as the energy it takes in and the waste it discharges.
    • The S in ESG is the most ambiguous component in the framework, as social impact relates not only to risks but also prosocial behaviour. It's the most difficult to measure but can have significant financial and reputational impact on corporations if material and poorly managed.
    • The G in ESG is foundational to the realization of S and E. It encompasses how well an organization integrates these considerations into the business and how well the organization engages with key stakeholders, receives feedback, and is transparent with its intentions.

    Common examples of ESG issues include: Environmental: Climate change, greenhouse gas emissions (CHG), deforestation, biodiversity, pollution, water, waste, extended producer responsibility, etc. Social: Customer relations, employee relations, labor, human rights, occupational health and safety, community relations, supply chains, etc. Governance: Board management practices, succession planning, compensation, diversity, equity and inclusion, regulatory compliance, corruption, fraud, data hygiene and security, etc. Source: Getting started with ESG - Sustainalytics

    Understanding the drivers behind ESG

    $30 trillion is expected to be transferred from the baby boomers to Generation Z and millennials over the next decade
    – Accenture

    Drivers

    • The rapid rise of ESG investing
    • The visibility of climate change is driving governments, society, and corporations to act and to initiate and support net zero goals.
    • A younger demographic that has strong convictions and financial influence
    • A growing trend toward mandatory climate and diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) disclosures required by global regulators
    • Recent emphasis by regulators on board accountability and fiduciary duty
    • Greater societal awareness of social issues and sustainability
    • A new generation of corporate leadership that is focused on sustainable innovation

    The evolving regulatory landscape

    Global regulators are mobilizing toward mandatory regulatory climate disclosure

    Canada

    • Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) NI 51-107 Disclosure of Climate-related Matters

    Europe

    • European Commission, Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR)
    • European Commission, EU Supply Chain Act
    • Germany – The German Supply Chain Act (GSCA)
    • Financial Conduct Authority UK, Proposal (DP 21/4) Sustainability Disclosure Requirements and investment labels
    • UK Modern Slavery Act, 2015

    United States

    • Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) 33-11042– The Enhancement and Standardization of Climate-Related Disclosures for Investors
    • SEC 33-11038 Cybersecurity Risk Management, Strategy, Governance, and Incident Disclosure
    • Nasdaq Board Diversity Rule (5605(f))

    New Zealand

    • New Zealand, The Financial Sector (Climate-related Disclosures and Other Matters) Amendment Act 2021

    Begin by setting your purpose

    Consider your role as a corporation in society and your impact on key stakeholders

    • The impact of a corporation can no longer be solely measured by financial impact but also its impact on social good. Corporations have become real-world actors that impact and are affected by the environment, people, and society.
    • An ESG program should start with defining your organization's purpose in terms of corporate responsibility, the role it will play, and how it will endure over time through managing adverse impacts and promoting positive impacts.
    • Corporations should look inward and outward to assess the material impact of ESG factors on their organization and key internal and external stakeholders.
    • Once stakeholders are identified, consider how the ESG factors might be perceived by delving into what matters to stakeholders and what drives their behavior.

    Understanding your stakeholder landscape is essential to achieving ESG goals

    Internal Stakeholders: Board; Management; Employees. External Stakeholders: Activists; Regulators; Customers; Lenders; Government; Investors; Stakeholders; Community; Suppliers

    Assess ESG impact

    Materiality assessments help to prioritize your ESG strategy and enable effective reporting

    • The concept of materiality as it relates to ESG is the process of gaining different perspectives on ESG issues and risks that may have significant impact (both positive and negative) on or relevance to company performance.
    • The objective of a materiality assessment is to identify material ESG issues most critical to your organization by looking a broad range of social and environmental factors. Its purpose is to narrow strategic focus and enable an organization to assess the impact of financial and non-financial risks aggregately.
    • It helps to make the case for ESG action and strategy, assess financial impact, get ahead of long-term risks, and inform communication strategies.
    • Organizations can leverage assessment tools from Sustainalytics or SASB Standards to help assess ESG risks or use guidance or benchmarking information from industry associations.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Survey key stakeholders to obtain a more holistic viewpoint of expectations and the industry landscape and gain credibility through the process.

    Use a materiality matrix to understand ESG exposure

    This is an image of a materiality matrix used to understand ESG exposure.

    Example: Beverage Company

    Follow a holistic approach

    To deliver on your purpose, sustainability must be integrated throughout the organization

    • An ESG program cannot be implemented in a silo. It must be anchored on its purpose and supported by a strong governance structure that is intertwined with other functional areas.
    • Effective governance is essential to instill trust, support sound decision making, and manage ESG.
    • Governance extends beyond shareholder rights to include many other factors, such as companies' interactions with competitors, suppliers, and governments. More transparency is sought on:
      • Corporate behavior, executive pay, and oversight of controls.
      • Board diversity, compensation, and skill set.
      • Oversight of risk management, particularly risks related to fraud, product, data, and cybersecurity

    "If ESG is the framework of non-financial risks that may have a material impact on the company's stakeholders, corporate governance is the process by which the company's directors and officers manage those risks."
    – Zurich Insurance

    A pyramid is depicted. The top of the pyramid is labeled Continual Improvement, and the following terms are inside this box. Governance: Strategy; Risk Management; Metrics & Targets. At the bottom of the pyramid is a box with right facing arrows, labeled Transparency and Disclosure. This is Informed by the TCFD Framework

    Governance and organization approach

    There is no one-size-fits-all approach

    47% of companies reported that the full board most commonly oversees climate related risks and opportunities while 20% delegate to an existing board governance committee (EY Research, 2021).

    • The organizational approach to ESG will differ across industry segments and corporations depending on material risks and their upstream and downstream value change. However, the accountability for ESG sits squarely at the CEO and board level.
    • Some organizations have taken the approach of hiring a Chief Sustainability Officer to work alongside the CEO on execution of ESG goals and stakeholder communication, while others use other members of the strategic leadership to drive the desired outcomes.
    Governance Layer Responsibilities
    Board
    • Overall accountability lies with the full board. Some responsibilities may be delegated to newly formed dedicated ESG governance committee.
    Oversight
    Executive leadership
    • Accountable for sustainability program success and will work with CEO to set ESG purpose and goals.
    Oversight and strategic direction
    Management
    • Senior management drives execution; sometimes led by a cross-functional committee.
    Execution

    Strategy alignment

    "74% of finance leaders say that investors increasingly use nonfinancial information in their decision-making."

    – "Aligning nonfinancial reporting..." EY, 2020

    • Like any journey, the ESG journey requires knowing where you are starting from and where you are heading to.
    • Once your purpose is crystalized, identify and surface gaps between where you want to go as an organization (your purpose and goals) and what you need to deliver as an organization to meet the expectations of your internal and external stakeholders (your output).
    • Using the results of the materiality assessment, weigh the risk, opportunities, and financial impact to help prioritize and determine vulnerabilities and where you might excel.
    • Finally, evaluate and make changes to areas of your business that need development to be successful (culture, accountability and board structure, ethics committee, etc.)

    Gap analysis example for delivering reporting requirements

    Organizational Goals

    • Regulatory Disclosure
      • Climate
      • DEI
      • Cyber governance
    • Performance Tracking/Annual Reporting
      • Corporate transparency on ESG performance via social, annual circular
    • Evidence-Based Business Reporting
      • Risk
      • Board
      • Suppliers

    Risk-size your ESG goals

    When integrating ESG risks, stick with a proven approach

    • Managing ESG risks is central to making sound organizational decisions regarding sustainability but also to anticipating future risks.
    • Like any new risk type, ESG risk should be interwoven into your current risk management and control framework via a risk-based approach.
    • Yet ESG presents some new risk challenges, and some risk areas may need new control processes or enhancements.
    NET NEW ENHANCEMENT
    Climate disclosure Data quality management
    Assurance specific to ESG reporting Risk sensing and assessment
    Supply chain transparency tied back to ESG Managing interconnections
    Scenario analysis
    Third-party ratings and monitoring

    Info-Tech Insight

    Integrate ESG risks early, embrace uncertainty by staying flexible, and strive for continual improvement.

    A funnel chart is depicted. The inputs to the funnel are: Strategy - Derive ESG risks from strategy, and Enterprise Risk Appetite. Inside the funnel, are the following terms: ESG; Data; Cyber. The output of the funnel is: Evidence based reporting ESG Insights & Performance metrics

    Managing supplier risks

    Suppliers are a critical input into an organization's ESG footprint

    "The typical consumer company's supply chain ... [accounts] for more than 80% of greenhouse-gas emissions and more than 90% of the impact on air, land, water, biodiversity, and geological resources."
    – McKinsey & Company, 2016

    • Although companies are accustomed to managing third parties via procurement processes, voluntary due-diligence, and contractual provisions, COVID-19 surfaced fragility across global supply chains.
    • The mismanagement of upstream and downstream risks of supply chains can harm the reputation, operations, and financial performance of businesses.
    • To build resiliency to and visibility of supply chain risk, organizations need to adapt current risk management programs, procurement practices, and risk assessment tools and techniques.
    • Procurement departments have an enhanced function, effectively acting as gatekeepers by performing due diligence, evaluating performance, and strengthening the supplier relationship through continual feedback and dialogue.
    • Technologies such as blockchain and IoT are starting to play a more dominant role in supply chain transparency.

    Raw materials are upstream and consumers are downstream.

    "Forty-five percent of survey respondents say that they either have no visibility into their upstream supply chain or that they can see only as far as their first-tier suppliers."
    – "Taking the pulse of shifting supply chains," McKinsey & Company, 2022

    Metrics and targets

    Metrics are key to stakeholder transparency, measuring performance against goals, and surfacing organizational blind spots

    • ESG metrics are qualitative or quantitative insights that measure organizations' performance against ESG goals. Along with traditional business metrics, they assist investors with assessing the long-term performance of companies based on non-financial ESG risks and opportunities.
    • Metrics, key performance indicators (KPIs), and key risk indicators (KRIs) are used to measure how ESG factors affect an organization and how an organization may impact any of the underlying issues related to each ESG factor.
    • There are several reporting standards that offer specific ESG performance metrics, such as the Global Reporting Institute (GRI), Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB), and World Economic Forum (WEF).
    • For climate-related disclosures, global regulators are converging on the Task Force for Climate-related Disclosures (TCFD) and the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB).

    Example metrics for ESG factors

    Example metrics for environment include greenhouse gas emissions, water footprint, renewable energy share, and % of recycled material. Example social metrics include rates of injury, proportion of spend on local supplies, and percentage of gender or ethnic groups in management roles. Example governance metrics include annual CEO compensation compared to median, number of PII data breaches, and completed number of supplier assessments.

    The impact of ESG on IT

    IT plays a critical role in achieving ESG goals

    • IT groups have a critical role to play in helping organizations develop strategic plans to meet ESG goals, measure performance, monitor risks, and deliver on disclosure requirements.
    • IT's involvement extends from the CIO providing input at a strategic level to leading the charge within IT to instill new goals and adapt the culture toward one focused on sustainability.
    • To set the tone, CIOs should begin by updating their IT governance structure and setting ESG goals for IT.
    • IT leaders will need to think about resource use and efficiency and incorporate this into their IT strategy.

    Info-Tech Insight

    IT leaders need to work collaboratively with risk management to optimize decision making and continually improve ESG performance and disclosure.

    "A great strategy meeting is a meeting of the minds."
    – Max McKeown

    The data challenge

    The ESG data requirement is large and continually expanding in scope

    • To meet ESG objectives, corporations are challenged with collecting non-financial data from across functional business and geographical locations and from their supplier base and supply chains.
    • One of the biggest impediments to ESG implementation is the lack of high-quality data and of mature processes and tools to support data collection.
    • The data challenge is compounded by the availability and usability of data, immature and fragmented standards that hinder comparability, and workflow integration.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Keep your data model flexible and digital where possible to enable data interoperability.

    A flow chart is depicted. the top box is labeled ESG Program. Below that are Boxes labeled Tactical and Strategic. Below the Tactical Box, is a large X showing a lack of connection to the following points: Duplicative; Inefficient/Costly. Below the box labeled Strategic are the following terms: Data-Driven; Reusable; Digital.

    "You can have data without information, but you cannot have information without data."
    – Daniel Keys Moran

    It's more than a data challenge

    Organizations will rely on IT for execution, and IT leaders will need to be ready

    Data Management: Aggregated Reporting; Supplier Management; Cyber Management; Operational Management; Ethical Design(AI, Blockchain); IT Architecture; Resource Efficiency; Processing & Tooling; Supplier Assessment.

    Top impacts on IT departments

    1. ESG requires corporations to keep track of ESG-related risks of third parties. This will mean more robust assessments and monitoring.
    2. Many areas of ESG are new and will require new processes and tools.
    3. The SEC has upped the ante recently, requiring more rigorous accountability and reporting on cyber incidents.
    4. New IT systems and architecture may be needed to support ESG programs.
    5. Current reporting frameworks may need updating as regulators move to digital.
    6. Ethical design will need to be considered when AI is used to support risk/data management and when it is used as part of product solutions.

    Key takeaways

    • It's critical for organizations to look inward and outward to assess the material impact of ESG factors on their organization and key internal and external stakeholders.
    • ESG requires a flexible, holistic approach across the organization. It must become part of the way you work and enable an active response to changing conditions.
    • ESG introduces new risks that should not be viewed in isolation but interwoven into your current risk management and control framework via a risk-based approach.
    • Identify and integrate risks early, embrace uncertainty by staying flexible, and strive for continual improvement.
    • Metrics are key to telling your ESG story. Place the appropriate importance on the information that will be reported.
    • Recognize that the data challenge is complex and evolving and design your data model to be flexible, interoperable, and digital.
    • IT's role is far reaching, and IT will have a critical part in managing third parties, selecting tools, developing supporting IT architecture, and using ethical design.

    Definitions

    TERM DEFINITON
    Corporate Social Responsibility Management concept whereby organizations integrate social and environmental concerns in their operations and interactions with their stakeholders.
    Chief Sustainability Officer Steers sustainability commitments, helps with compliance, and helps ensure internal commitments are met. Responsibilities may extend to acting as a liaison with government and public affairs, fostering an internal culture, acting as a change agent, and leading delivery.
    ESG An acronym that stands for environment, social, and governance. These are the three components of a sustainability program.
    ESG Standard Contains detailed disclosure criteria including performance measures or metrics. Standards provide clear, consistent criteria and specifications for reporting. Typically created through consultation process.
    ESG Framework A broad contextual model for information that provides guidance and shapes the understanding of a certain topic. It sets direction but does not typically delve into the methodology. Frameworks are often used in conjunction with standards.
    ESG Factors The factors or issues that fall under the three ESG components. Measures the sustainability performance of an organization.
    ESG Rating An aggregated score based on the magnitude of an organization's unmanaged ESG risk. Ratings are provided by third-party rating agencies and are increasingly being used for financing, transparency to investors, etc.
    ESG Questionnaire ESG surveys or questionnaires are administered by third parties and used to assess an organization's sustainability performance. Participation is voluntary.
    Key Risk Indicator (KRI) A measure to indicate the potential presence, level, or trend of a risk.
    Key Performance Indicator (KPI) A measure of deviation from expected outcomes to help a firm see how it is performing.
    Materiality Material topics are topics that have a direct or indirect impact on an organization's ability to create, preserve, or erode economic, environment and social impact for itself and its stakeholder and society as a whole
    Materiality Assessment A materiality assessment is a tool to identify and prioritize the ESG issues most critical to the organization.
    Risk Sensing The range of activities carried out to identify and understand evolving sources of risk that could have a significant impact on the organization (e.g. social listening).
    Sustainability The ability of an organization and broader society to endure and survive over the long term by managing adverse impacts well and promoting positive opportunities.
    Sustainalytics Now part of Morningstar. Sustainalytics provides ESG research, ratings, and data to institutional investors and companies.
    UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) provide an essential methodological foundation for how impacts across all dimensions should be assessed.

    Reporting & standard frameworks

    STANDARD DEFINITION AND FOCUS
    CDP CDP has created standards and metrics for comparing sustainability impact. Focuses on environmental data (e.g. carbon, water, and forests) and on data disclosure and benchmarking.
    (Formally Carbon Disclosure Project) Audience: All stakeholders
    Dow Jones Sustainability Indices (DJSI) Heavy on corporate governance and company performance. Equal balance of economic, environmental, and social.
    Audience: All stakeholders
    Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) International standards organization that has a set of standards to help organizations understand and communicate their impacts on climate change and social responsibility. The standard has a strong emphasis on transparency and materiality, especially on social issues.
    Audience: All stakeholders
    International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) Standard-setting board that sits within the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Foundation. The IFRS Foundation is a not-for-profit, public-interest organization established to develop high-quality, understandable, enforceable, and globally accepted accounting and sustainability disclosure standards.
    Audience: Investor-focused
    United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (UNSDG) Global partnership across sectors and industries to achieve sustainable development for all (17 Global Goals)
    Audience: All stakeholders
    Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) Industry-specific standards to help corporations select topics that may impact their financial performance. Focus on material impacts on financial condition or operating performance.
    Audience: Investor-focused
    Task Force Of Climate-related Disclosures (TCFD; created by the Financial Stability Board) Standards framework focused on the impact of climate risk on financial and operating performance. More broadly the disclosures inform investors of positive and negative measures taken to build climate resilience and make transparent the exposure to climate-related risk.
    Audience: Investors, financial stakeholders

    Bibliography

    Anne-Titia Bove and Steven Swartz, McKinsey, "Starting at the source: Sustainability in supply chains", 11 November 2016

    Accenture, "The Greater Wealth Transfer – Capitalizing on the intergenerational shift in wealth", 2012

    Beth Kaplan, Deloitte, "Preparing for the ESG Landscape, Readiness and reporting ESG strategies through controllership playbook", 15 February 2022

    Bjorn Nilsson et al, McKinsey & Company, "Financial institutions and nonfinancial risk: How corporates build resilience," 28 February 2022

    Bolden, Kyle, Ernst and Young, "Aligning nonfinancial reporting with your ESG strategy to communicate long-term value", 18 Dec. 2020

    Canadian Securities Administrators, "Canadian securities regulators seek comment on climate-related disclosure requirements", 18 October 2021

    Carol A. Adams et al., Global Risk Institute, "The double-materiality concept, Application and issues", May 2021

    Dunstan Allison-Hope et al, BSR, "Impact-Based Materiality, Why Companies Should-Focus Their Assessments on Impacts Rather than Perception", 3 February 2022

    EcoVadis, "The World's Most Trusted Business Sustainability Ratings",

    Ernst and Young, "Four opportunities for enhancing ESG oversight", 29 June 2021

    Federal Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs, The Act on Corporate Due Diligence Obligations in Supply Chains (Gesetz über die unternehmerischen Sorgfaltspflichten in Lieferketten)", Published into Federal Law Gazette, 22, July 2021

    "What Every Company Needs to Know", Sustainalytics

    Global Risk Institute, The GRI Perspective, "The materiality madness: why definitions matter", 22 February 2022

    John P Angkaw "Applying ERM to ESG Risk Management", 1 August 2022

    Hillary Flynn et al., Wellington Management, "A guide to ESG materiality assessments", June 2022

    Katie Kummer and Kyle Lawless, Ernst and Young, "Five priorities to build trust in ESG", 14 July 2022

    Knut Alicke et al., McKinsey & Company, "Taking the pulse of shifting supply chains", 26 August 2022

    Kosmas Papadopoulos and Rodolfo Arauj. The Harvard School Forum on Corporate Governance, "The Seven Sins of ESG Management", 23 September 2020

    KPMG, Sustainable Insight, "The essentials of materiality assessment", 2014

    Lorraine Waters, The Stack, "ESG is not an environmental issue, it's a data one", 20 May 2021

    Marcel Meyer, Deloitte, "What is TCFD and why does it matter? Understanding the various layers and implications of the recommendations",

    Michael W Peregnne et al., "The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, The Important Legacy of the Sarbanes Oxley Act," 30 August 2022

    Michael Posner, Forbes, "Business and Human Rights: Looking Ahead To The Challenges Of 2022", 15 December 2021

    Myles Corson and Tony Kilmas, Ernst and Young, "How the CFO can balance competing demands and drive future growth", 3 November 2020

    Novisto, "Navigating Climate Data Disclosure", 2022

    Novisto, "XBRL is coming to corporate sustainability reporting", 17 April 2022

    "Official Journal of the European Union, Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2019 on sustainability-related disclosures in the financial services sector", 9 December 2019

    Osler, "ESG and the future of sustainability", Podcast, 01 June 2022

    Osler, "The Rapidly Evolving World of ESG Disclosure: ISSB draft standards for sustainability and climate related disclosures", 19 May 2022

    Sarwar Choudhury and Zach Johnston, Ernst and Young "Preparing for Sox-Like ESG Regulation", 7 June 2022

    Securities and Exchange Commission, "The Enhancement and Standardization of Climate-related Disclosures for Investors", 12 May 2022

    "Securities and Exchange Commission, SEC Proposes Rules on Cybersecurity, Risk Management, Strategy, Governance, and Incident Disclosure by Public Companies, 9 May 2022

    Sean Brown and Robin Nuttall, McKinsey & Company, "The role of ESG and purpose", 4 January 2022

    Statement by Chair Gary Gensler, "Statement on ESG Disclosure Proposal", 25 May 2022

    Svetlana Zenkin and Peter Hennig, Forbes, "Managing Supply Chain Risk, Reap ESG Rewards", 22 June 2022

    Task Force on Climate Related Financial Disclosures, "Final Report, Recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures", June 2017

    World Economic Forum, "Why sustainable governance and corporate integrity are crucial for ESG", 29 July 2022

    World Economic Forum (in collaboration with PwC) "How to Set Up Effective Climate Governance on Corporate Boards, Guiding Principles and questions", January 2019

    World Economic Forum, "Defining the "G" in ESG Governance Factors at the Heart of Sustainable Business", June 2022

    World Economic Forum, "The Risk and Role of the Chief Integrity Officer: Leadership Imperatives in and ESG-Driven World", December 2021

    World Economic Forum, "How to Set Up Effective Climate Governance on Corporate Boards Guiding principles and questions", January 2019

    Zurich Insurance, "ESG and the new mandate for corporate governance", 2022

    Strengthen the SSDLC for Enterprise Mobile Applications

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}283|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Mobile Development
    • Parent Category Link: /mobile-development
    • CEOs see mobile for employees as their top mandate for upcoming technology innovation initiatives, making security a key competency for development.
    • Unsecure mobile applications can cause your employees to question the mobile applications’ integrity for handling sensitive data, limiting uptake.
    • Secure mobile development tends to be an afterthought, where vulnerabilities are tested for post-production rather than during the build process.
    • Developers lack the expertise, processes, and proper tools to effectively enhance applications for mobile security.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Organizations currently react to security issues. Info-Tech recommends a proactive approach to ensure a secure software development life cycle (SSDLC) end-to-end.
    • Organizations currently lack the secure development practices to provide highly secure mobile applications that end users can trust.
    • Enable your developers with five key secure development techniques from Info-Tech’s development toolkit.

    Impact and Result

    • Embed secure development techniques into your SDLC.
    • Create a repeatable process for your developers to continually evaluate and optimize mobile application security for new threats and corresponding mitigation steps.
    • Build capabilities within your team based on Info-Tech’s framework by supporting ongoing security improvements through monitoring and metric analysis.

    Strengthen the SSDLC for Enterprise Mobile Applications Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should adopt secure development techniques for mobile application development, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Assess secure mobile development processes

    Determine the current security landscape of mobile application development.

    • Strengthen the SSDLC for Enterprise Mobile Applications – Phase 1: Assess Secure Mobile Development Practices
    • Systems Architecture Template
    • Mobile Application High-Level Design Requirements Template

    2. Implement and test secure mobile techniques

    Incorporate the various secure development techniques into current development practices.

    • Strengthen the SSDLC for Enterprise Mobile Applications – Phase 2: Implement and Test Secure Mobile Techniques

    3. Monitor and support secure mobile applications

    Create a roadmap for mobile optimization initiatives.

    • Strengthen the SSDLC for Enterprise Mobile Applications – Phase 3: Monitor and Support Secure Mobile Applications
    • Mobile Optimization Roadmap
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Strengthen the SSDLC for Enterprise Mobile Applications

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Assess Your Secure Mobile Development Practices

    The Purpose

    Identification of the triggers of your secure mobile development initiatives.

    Assessment of the security vulnerabilities in your mobile applications from an end-user perspective.

    Identification of the execution of your mobile environment.

    Assessment of the mobile threats and vulnerabilities to your systems architecture.

    Prioritization of your mobile threats.

    Creation of your risk register.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Key opportunity areas where a secure development optimization initiative can provide tangible benefits.

    Identification of security requirements.

    Prioritized list of security threats.

    Initial mobile security risk register created. 

    Activities

    1.1 Establish the triggers of your secure mobile development initiatives.

    1.2 Assess the security vulnerabilities in your mobile applications from an end-user perspective.

    1.3 Understand the execution of your mobile environment with a systems architecture.

    1.4 Assess the mobile threats and vulnerabilities to your systems architecture.

    1.5 Prioritize your mobile threats.

    1.6 Begin building your risk register.

    Outputs

    Mobile Application High-Level Design Requirements Document

    Systems Architecture Diagram

    2 Implement and Test Your Secure Mobile Techniques

    The Purpose

    Discovery of secure development techniques to apply to current development practices.

    Discovery of new user stories from applying secure development techniques.

    Discovery of new test cases from applying secure development techniques.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Areas within your code that can be optimized for improving mobile application security.

    New user stories created in relation to mitigation steps.

    New test cases created in relation to mitigation steps.

    Activities

    2.1 Gauge the state of your secure mobile development practices.

    2.2 Identify the appropriate techniques to fill gaps.

    2.3 Develop user stories from security development gaps identified.

    2.4 Develop test cases from user story gaps identified.

    Outputs

    Mobile Application High-Level Design Requirements Document

    3 Monitor and Support Your Secure Mobile Applications

    The Purpose

    Identification of key metrics used to measure mobile application security issues.

    Identification of secure mobile application and development process optimization initiatives.

    Identification of enablers and blockers of your mobile security optimization.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Metrics for measuring application security.

    Modified triaging process for addressing security issues.

    Initiatives for development optimization.

    Enablers and blockers identified for mobile security optimization initiatives.

    Process for developing your mobile optimization roadmap.

    Activities

    3.1 List the metrics that would be gathered to assess the success of your mobile security optimization.

    3.2 Adjust and modify your triaging process to enhance handling of security issues.

    3.3 Brainstorm secure mobile application and development process optimization initiatives.

    3.4 Identify the enablers and blockers of your mobile security optimization.

    3.5 Define your mobile security optimization roadmap.

    Outputs

    Mobile Optimization Roadmap

    Become a Strategic CIO

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}80|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.5/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $10,000 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 15 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: IT Strategy
    • Parent Category Link: /it-strategy
    • As a CIO, you are currently operating in a stable and trusted IT environment, but you would like to advance your role to strategic business partner.
    • CIOs are often overlooked as a strategic partner by their peers, and therefore face the challenge of proving they deserve a seat at the table.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • To become a strategic business partner, you must think and act as a business person that works in IT, rather than an IT person that works for the business.
    • Career advancement is not a solo effort. Building relationships with your executive business stakeholders will be critical to becoming a respected business partner.

    Impact and Result

    • Create a personal development plan and stakeholder management strategy to accelerate your career and become a strategic business partner. For a CIO to be considered a strategic business partner, he or she must be able to:
      • Act as a business person that works in IT, rather than an IT person that works for the business. This involves meeting executive stakeholder expectations, facilitating innovation, and managing stakeholder relationships.
      • Align IT with the customer. This involves providing business stakeholders with information to support stronger decision making, keeping up with disruptive technologies, and constantly adapting to the ever-changing end-customer needs.
      • Manage talent and change. This involves performing strategic workforce planning, and being actively engaged in identifying opportunities to introduce change in your organization, suggesting ways to improve, and then acting on them.

    Become a Strategic CIO Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should become a strategic CIO, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Launch

    Analyze strategic CIO competencies and assess business stakeholder satisfaction with IT using Info-Tech's CIO Business Vision Diagnostic and CXO-CIO Alignment Program.

    • Become a Strategic CIO – Phase 1: Launch

    2. Assess

    Evaluate strategic CIO competencies and business stakeholder relationships.

    • Become a Strategic CIO – Phase 2: Assess
    • CIO Strategic Competency Evaluation Tool
    • CIO Stakeholder Power Map Template

    3. Plan

    Create a personal development plan and stakeholder management strategy.

    • Become a Strategic CIO – Phase 3: Plan
    • CIO Personal Development Plan
    • CIO Stakeholder Management Strategy Template

    4. Execute

    Develop a scorecard to track personal development initiatives.

    • Become a Strategic CIO – Phase 4: Execute
    • CIO Strategic Competency Scorecard
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Become a Strategic CIO

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Assess Competencies & Stakeholder Relationships

    The Purpose

    Gather and review information from business stakeholders.

    Assess strategic CIO competencies and business stakeholder relationships.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Gathered information to create a personal development plan and stakeholder management strategy.

    Analyzed the information from diagnostics and determined the appropriate next steps.

    Identified and prioritized strategic CIO competency gaps.

    Evaluated the power, impact, and support of key business stakeholders.

    Activities

    1.1 Conduct CIO Business Vision diagnostic

    1.2 Conduct CXO-CIO Alignment program

    1.3 Assess CIO competencies

    1.4 Assess business stakeholder relationships

    Outputs

    CIO Business Vision results

    CXO-CIO Alignment Program results

    CIO competency gaps

    Executive Stakeholder Power Map

    2 Take Control of Your Personal Development

    The Purpose

    Create a personal development plan and stakeholder management strategy.

    Track your personal development and establish checkpoints to revise initiatives.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Identified personal development and stakeholder engagement initiatives to bridge high priority competency gaps.

    Identified key performance indicators and benchmarks/targets to track competency development.

    Activities

    2.1 Create a personal development plan

    2.2 Create a stakeholder management strategy

    2.3 Establish key performance indicators and benchmarks/targets

    Outputs

    Personal Development Plan

    Stakeholder Management Strategy

    Strategic CIO Competency Scorecard

    Build Your Generative AI Roadmap

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}105|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 10.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $33,499 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 11 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Innovation
    • Parent Category Link: /innovation

    Generative AI has made a grand entrance, presenting opportunities and causing disruption across organizations and industries. Moving beyond the hype, it’s imperative to build and implement a strategic plan to adopt generative AI and outpace competitors.

    Yet generative AI has to be done right because the opportunity comes with risks and the investments have to be tied to outcomes.

    Adopt a human-centric and value-based approach to generative AI

    IT and business leaders will need to be strategic and deliberate to thrive as AI adoption changes industries and business operations.

    • Establish responsible AI guiding principles: Address human-based requirements to govern how generative AI applications are developed and deployed.
    • Align generative AI initiatives to strategic drivers for the organization: Assess generative AI opportunities by seeing how they align to the strategic drivers of the organization. Examples of strategic drivers include increasing revenue, reducing costs, driving innovation, and mitigating risk.
    • Measure and communicate effectively: Have clear metrics in place to measure progress and success of AI initiatives and communicate both policies and results effectively.

    Build Your Generative AI Roadmap Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Build Your Generative AI Roadmap Deck – A step-by-step document that walks you through how to leverage generative AI and align with the organization’s mission and objectives to increase revenue, reduce costs, accelerate innovation, and mitigate risk.

    This blueprint outlines how to build your generative AI roadmap, establish responsible AI principles, prioritize opportunities, and develop policies for usage. Establishing and adhering to responsible AI guiding principles provides safeguards for the adoption of generative AI applications.

    • Build Your Generative AI Roadmap – Phases 1-4

    2. AI Maturity Assessment and Roadmap Tool – Develop deliverables that will be milestones in creating your organization’s generative AI roadmap for implementing candidate applications.

    This tool provides guidance for developing the following deliverables:

  • Responsible AI guiding principles
  • Current AI maturity
  • Prioritized candidate generative AI applications
  • Generative AI policies
  • Generative AI roadmap
    • AI Maturity Assessment and Roadmap Tool

    3. The Era of Generative AI C‑Suite Presentation – Develop responsible AI guiding principles, assess AI capabilities and readiness, and prioritize use cases based on complexity and alignment with organizational goals and responsible AI guiding principles.

    This presentation template uses sample business capabilities (use cases) from the Marketing & Advertising business capability map to provide examples of candidates for generative AI applications. The final executive presentation should highlight the value-based initiatives driving generative AI applications, the benefits and risks involved, how the proposed generative AI use cases align to the organization’s strategy and goals, the success criteria for the proofs of concept, and the project roadmap.

    • The Era of Generative AI C‑Suite Presentation

    Infographic

    Further reading

    Build Your Generative AI Roadmap

    Leverage the power of generative AI to improve business outcomes.

    Analyst Perspective

    We are entering the era of generative AI. This is a unique time in our history where the benefits of AI are easily accessible and becoming pervasive, with copilots emerging in the major business tools we use today. The disruptive capabilities that can potentially drive dramatic benefits also introduce risks that need to be planned for.

    A successful business-driven generative AI roadmap requires:

    • Establishing responsible AI guiding principles to guide the development and deployment of generative AI applications.
    • Assess generative AI opportunities by using criteria based on the organization's mission and objectives, responsible AI guiding principles, and the complexity of the initiative.
    • Communicating, educating on, and enforcing generative AI usage policies.

    Bill Wong, Principal Research Director

    Bill Wong
    Principal Research Director
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge Common Obstacles Solution

    Generative AI is disrupting all industries and providing opportunities for organization-wide advantages.

    Organizations need to understand this disruptive technology and trends to properly develop a strategy for leveraging this technology successfully.

    • Generative AI requires alignment to a business strategy.
    • IT is an enabler and needs to align with and support the business stakeholders.
    • Organizations need to adopt a data-driven culture.

    All organizations, regardless of size, should be planning how to respond to this new and innovative technology.

    Business stakeholders need to cut through the hype surrounding generative AI like ChatGPT to optimize investments for leveraging this technology to drive business outcomes.

    • Understand the market landscape, benefits, and risks associated with generative AI.
    • Plan for responsible AI.
    • Understand the gaps the organization needs to address to fully leverage generative AI.

    Without a proper strategy and responsible AI guiding principles, the risks to deploying this technology could negatively impact business outcomes.

    Info-Tech's human-centric, value-based approach is a guide for deploying generative AI applications and covers:

    • Responsible AI guiding principles
    • AI Maturity Model
    • Prioritizing candidate generative AI-based use cases
    • Developing policies for usage

    This blueprint will provide the list of activities and deliverables required for the successful deployment of generative AI solutions.

    Info-Tech Insight
    Create awareness among the CEO and C-suite of executives on the potential benefits and risks of transforming the business with generative AI.

    Key concepts

    Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    A field of computer science that focuses on building systems to imitate human behavior, with a focus on developing AI models that can learn and can autonomously take actions on behalf of a human.

    AI Maturity Model
    The AI Maturity Model is a useful tool to assess the level of skills an organization has with respect to developing and deploying AI applications. The AI Maturity Model has multiple dimensions to measure an organization's skills, such as AI governance, data, people, process, and technology.

    Responsible AI
    Refers to guiding principles to govern the development, deployment, and maintenance of AI applications. In addition, these principles also provide human-based requirements that AI applications should address. Requirements include safety and security, privacy, fairness and bias detection, explainability and transparency, governance, and accountability.

    Generative AI
    Given a prompt, a generative AI system can generate new content, which can be in the form of text, images, audio, video, etc.

    Natural Language Processing (NLP)
    NLP is a subset of AI that involves machine interpretation and replication of human language. NLP focuses on the study and analysis of linguistics as well as other principles of artificial intelligence to create an effective method of communication between humans and machines or computers.

    ChatGPT
    An AI-powered chatbot application built on OpenAI's GPT-3.5 implementation, ChatGPT accepts text prompts to generate text-based output.

    Your challenge

    This research is designed to help organizations that are looking to:

    • Establish responsible AI guiding principles to address human-based requirements and to govern the development and deployment of the generative AI application.
    • Identify new generative AI-enabled opportunities to transform the work environment to increase revenue, reduce costs, drive innovation, or reduce risk.
    • Prioritize candidate use cases and develop generative AI policies for usage.
    • Have clear metrics in place to measure the progress and success of AI initiatives.
    • Build the roadmap to implement the candidate use cases.

    Common obstacles

    These barriers make these goals challenging for many organizations:

    • Getting all the right business stakeholders together to develop the organization's AI strategy, vision, and objectives.
    • Establishing responsible AI guiding principles to guide generative AI investments and deployments.
    • Advancing the AI maturity of the organization to meet requirements of data and AI governance as well as human-based requirements such as fairness, transparency, and accountability.
    • Assessing generative AI opportunities and developing policies for use.

    Info-Tech's definition of an AI-enabled business strategy

    • A high-level plan that provides guiding principles for applications that are fully driven by the business needs and capabilities that are essential to the organization.
    • A strategy that tightly weaves business needs and the applications required to support them. It covers AI architecture, adoption, development, and maintenance.
    • A way to ensure that the necessary people, processes, and technology are in place at the right time to sufficiently support business goals.
    • A visionary roadmap to communicate how strategic initiatives will address business concerns.

    An effective AI strategy is driven by the business stakeholders of the organization and focused on delivering improved business outcomes.

    Build Your Generative AI Roadmap

    This blueprint in context

    This guidance covers how to create a tactical roadmap for executing generative AI initiatives

    Scope

    • This blueprint is not a proxy for a fully formed AI strategy. Step 1 of our framework necessitates alignment of your AI and business strategies. Creation of your AI strategy is not within the scope of this approach.
    • This approach sets the foundations for building and applying responsible AI principles and AI policies aligned to corporate governance and key regulatory obligations (e.g. privacy). Both steps are foundational components of how you should develop, manage, and govern your AI program but are not a substitute for implementing broader AI governance.

    Guidance on how to implement AI governance can be found in the blueprint linked below.

    Tactical Plan

    Download our AI Governance blueprint

    Measure the value of this blueprint

    Leverage this blueprint's approach to ensure your generative AI initiatives align with and support your key business drivers

    This blueprint will guide you to drive and improve business outcomes. Key business drivers will often focus on:

    • Increasing revenue
    • Reducing costs
    • Improving time to market
    • Reducing risk

    In phase 1 of this blueprint, we will help you identify the key AI strategy initiatives that align to your organization's goals. Value to the organization is often measured by the estimated impact on revenue, costs, time to market, or risk mitigation.

    In phase 4, we will help you develop a plan and a roadmap for addressing any gaps and introducing the relevant generative AI capabilities that drive value to the organization based on defined business metrics.

    Once you implement your 12-month roadmap, start tracking the metrics below over the next fiscal year (FY) to assess the effectiveness of measures:

    Business Outcome Objective Key Success Metric
    Increasing Revenue Increased revenue from identified key areas
    Reducing Costs Decreased costs for identified business units
    Improving Time to Market Time savings and accelerated revenue adoption
    Reducing Risk Cost savings or revenue gains from identified business units

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit Guided Implementation Workshop Consulting
    "Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful." "Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track." "We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place." "Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project."

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks are used throughout all four options.

    Guided Implementation

    What does a typical GI on this topic look like?

    Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4

    Call #1: Scope requirements, objectives, and your specific challenges.

    Call #2: Identify AI strategy, vision, and objectives.

    Call #3: Define responsible AI guiding principles to adopt and identify current AI maturity level. Call #4: Assess and prioritize generative AI initiatives and draft policies for usage.

    Call #5: Build POC implementation plan and establish metrics for POC success.

    Call #6: Build and deliver executive-level generative AI presentation.

    A Guided Implementation (GI) is a series of calls with an Info-Tech analyst to help implement our best practices in your organization.

    A typical GI is between 5 to 8 calls over the course of 1 to 2 months.

    AI Roadmap Workshop Agenda Overview

    Contact your account representative for more information.
    workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8889

    Session 1 Session 2 Session 3 Session 4
    Establish Responsible AI Guiding Principles Assess AI Maturity Prioritize Opportunities and Develop Policies Build Roadmap
    Trends Consumer groups, organizations, and governments around the world are demanding that AI applications adhere to human-based values and take into consideration possible impacts of the technology on society. Leading organizations are building AI models guided by responsible AI guiding principles. Organizations delivering new applications without developing policies for use will produce negative business outcomes. Developing a roadmap to address human-based values is challenging. This process introduces new tools, processes, and organizational change.
    Activities
    • Focus on working with executive stakeholders to establish guiding principles for the development and delivery of new applications.
    • Assess the organization's current capabilities to deliver AI-based applications and address human-based requirements.
    • Leverage business alignment criteria, responsible AI guiding principles, and project characteristics to prioritize candidate uses cases and develop policies.
    • Build the implementation plan, POC metrics, and success criteria for each candidate use case.
    • Build the roadmap to address the gap between the current and future state and enable the identified use cases.
    Inputs
    • Understanding of external legal and regulatory requirements and organizational values and goals.
    • Risk assessment of the proposed use case and a plan to monitor its impact.
    • Assessment of the organization's current AI capabilities with respect to its AI governance, data, people, process, and technology infrastructure.
    • Criteria to assess candidate use cases by evaluating against the organization's mission and goals, the responsible AI guiding principles, and complexity of the project.
    • Risk assessment for each proposed use case
    • POC implementation plan for each candidate use case
    Deliverables
    1. Foundational responsible AI guiding principles
    2. Additional customized guiding principles to add for consideration
    1. Current level of AI maturity, resources, and capacity
    1. Prioritization of opportunities
    2. Generative AI policies for usage
    1. Roadmap to a target state that enables the delivery of the prioritized generative AI use cases
    2. Executive presentation

    AI Roadmap Workshop Agenda Overview

    Contact your account representative for more information.
    workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8889

    Insight summary

    Overarching Insight
    Build your generative AI roadmap to guide investments and deployment of these solutions.

    Responsible AI
    Assemble the C-suite to make them aware of the benefits and risks of adopting generative AI-based solutions.

    • Establish responsible AI guiding principles to govern the development and deployment of generative AI applications.

    AI Maturity Model
    Assemble key stakeholders and SMEs to assess the challenges and tasks required to implement generative AI applications.

    • Assess current level of AI maturity, skills, and resources.
    • Identify desired AI maturity level and challenges to enable deployment of candidate use cases.

    Opportunity Prioritization
    Assess candidate business capabilities targeted for generative AI to see if they align to the organization's business criteria, responsible AI guiding principles, and capabilities for delivering the project.

    • Develop prioritized list of candidate use cases.
    • Develop policies for generative AI usage.

    Tactical Insight
    Identify the gaps needed to address deploying generative AI successfully.

    Tactical Insight
    Identify organizational impact and requirements for deploying generative AI applications.

    Key takeaways for developing an effective business-driven generative AI roadmap

    Align the AI strategy with the business strategy

    Create responsible AI guiding principles, which are a critical success factor

    Evolve AI maturity level by focusing on principle-based requirements

    Develop criteria to assess generative AI initiatives

    Develop generative AI policies for use

    Blueprint deliverables

    Each step of this blueprint is accompanied by supporting deliverables to help you accomplish your goals:

    AI Maturity Assessment & Roadmap Tool
    Use our best-of-breed AI Maturity Framework to analyze the gap between your current and target states and develop a roadmap aligned with your value stream to close the gap.

    The Era of Generative AI C-Suite Presentation
    Present your AI roadmap in a prepopulated document that summarizes all the key findings of this blueprint and provides your C-suite with a view of the AI challenge and your plan of action to meet it.

    Our AI Maturity Assessment & Roadmap and The Era of Generative AI C-Suite Presentation tools enable you to shape your generative AI roadmap and communicate the deliverables to your C-suite sponsors in terms of the value of initiatives.

    Artificial Intelligence Index Report - Key Findings

    CEOs , CIOs, and business leaders are struggling with many questions surrounding the adoption of generative AI

    November 30, 2022
    OpenAI releases ChatGPT

    ChatGPT is a large language model, or an AI-based chatbot, that became so popular it reached 100 million monthly active users in just two months.

    This made it the fastest-growing consumer application in history. The launch of this generative AI application has created a frenzy of interest and activity across all industries. Organizations are rushing to understand how to leverage this innovation and, at the same time, manage the new risks and disruptions generative AI introduces.

    • Generative AI breaks into the public consciousness.
    • AI systems become more flexible.
    • Generative models have arrived and so have their ethical problems.
    • The number of incidents concerning the misuse of AI is rapidly rising.
    • Interest in AI ethics continues to skyrocket.
    • The legal world is waking up to AI.

    When Stanford asked ChatGPT to explain why it is significant, this was ChatGPT's response:
    ChatGPT is significant because it is a highly advanced Al language model developed by OpenAI, which can generate human-like text responses to questions and prompts. Its large-scale training on diverse text data and its cutting-edge deep learning architecture make it capable of generating informative and coherent responses to a wide range of topics, making it useful for various NLP applications such as chatbots, content generation, and language translation. Additionally, its open-source availability allows for further research and development in the field of Al language processing.

    Source: Stanford

    AI overview

    AI definitions

    Definitions

    • Artificial intelligence (AI) is human intelligence mimicked by machine algorithms. Examples: Playing Chess or Go.
    • Machine learning (ML) is a subset of AI algorithms to parse data, learn from data, and then make a determination or prediction. Example: spam detection, preventative maintenance.
    • Deep learning (DL) is a subset of machine learning algorithms that leverage artificial neural networks to develop relationships among the data. Examples: image classification, facial recognition, generative AI.

    What Makes AI Perform

    What Makes AI Different

    Generative AI gives very human-like responses to general queries, and its capabilities are growing exponentially

    Large language models power generative AI

    Transformer-Based Large Language Models

    Conventional AI

    • Conventional neural networks
      • Process data sequentially
    • Input total string of text
    • Good for applications not needing to understanding context or relationships

    Generative AI

    • Transformer-based neural networks
      • Can process data in parallel
    • Attention-based inputs
    • Able to create new human-like responses

    Benefits/Use Cases

    • Chatbots for member service and support
    • Writing email responses, resumes, and papers
    • Creating photorealistic art
    • Suggesting new drug compounds to test
    • Designing physical products and buildings
    • And more...

    Generative AI is transforming all industries

    Financial Services
    Create more engaging customer collateral by generating personalized correspondence based on previous customer engagements. Collect and aggregate data to produce insights into the behavior of target customer segments.

    Retail Generate unique, engaging, and high-quality marketing copy or content, from long-form blog posts or landing pages to SEO-optimized digital ads, in seconds.

    Manufacturing
    Generate new designs for products that comply to specific constraints, such as size, weight, energy consumption, or cost.

    Government
    Transform the citizen experience with chatbots or virtual assistants to assist people with a wide range of inquiries, from answering frequently asked questions to providing personalized advice on public services.

    The global generative AI market size reached US $10.3 billion in 2022. Looking forward, forecasts estimate growth to US $30.4 billion by 2028, 20.01% compound annual growth rate (CAGR).

    Source: IMARC Group

    Generative AI is transforming all industries

    Healthcare
    Chatbots can be used as conversational patient assistants for personalized interactions based on the patient's questions.

    Utilities
    Analyze customer data to identify usage patterns, segment customers, and generate targeted product offerings leveraging energy efficiency programs or demand response initiatives.

    Education
    Generate personalized lesson plans for students based on their past performance, learning styles, current skill level, and any previous feedback.

    Insurance
    Improve underwriting by inputting claims data from previous years to generate optimally priced policies and uncover reasons for losses in the past across a large number of claims

    Companies are assessing the use of ChatGPT/LLM

    A wide spectrum of usage policies are in place at different companies*

    Companies assessing ChatGPT/LLM

    *As of June 2023

    Bain & Company has announced a global services alliance with OpenAI (February 21, 2023).

    • Internally
      • "The alliance builds on Bain's adoption of OpenAI technologies for its 18,000-strong multidisciplinary team of knowledge workers. Over the past year, Bain has embedded OpenAI technologies into its internal knowledge management systems, research, and processes to improve efficiency."
    • Externally
      • "With the alliance, Bain will combine its deep digital implementation capabilities and strategic expertise with OpenAI's AI tools and platforms, including ChatGPT, to help its Members around the world identify and implement the value of AI to maximize business potential. The Coca-Cola Company announced as the first company to engage with the alliance."

    News Sites:

    • "BuzzFeed to use AI to write its articles after firing 180 employees or 12% of the total staff" (Al Mayadeen, January 27, 2023).
    • "CNET used AI to write articles. It was a journalistic disaster." (Washington Post, January 17, 2023).

    Leading Generative AI Vendors

    Text

    Leading generative AI vendors for text

    Image

    • DALL�E 2
    • Stability AI
    • Midjourney
    • Craiyon
    • Dream
    • ...

    Audio

    • Replica Studios
    • Speechify
    • Murf
    • PlayHT
    • LOVO
    • ...

    Cybersecurity

    • CrowdStrike
    • Palo Alto Networks
    • SentinelOne
    • Cisco
    • Microsoft Security Copilot
    • Google Cloud Security AI Workbench
    • ...

    Code

    Leading generative AI vendors for code

    Video

    • Synthesia
    • Lumen5
    • FlexClip
    • Elai
    • Veed.io
    • ...

    Data

    • MOSTLY AI
    • Synthesized
    • YData
    • Gretel
    • Copulas
    • ...

    Enterprise Software

    • Salesforce
    • Microsoft 365, Dynamics
    • Google Workspace
    • SAP
    • Oracle
    • ...

    and many, many more to come...

    Today, generative AI has limitations and risks

    Responses need to be verified

    Accuracy

    • Generative AI may generate inaccurate and/or false information.

    Bias

    • Being trained on data from the internet can lead to bias.

    Hallucinations

    • AI can generate responses that are not based on observation.

    Infrastructure Required

    • Large investments are required for compute and data.

    Transparency

    • LLMs use both supervised and unsupervised learning, so its ability to explain how it arrived at a decision may be limited and not sufficient for some legal and healthcare use cases.

    When asked if it is sentient, the Bing chatbot replied:

    "I think that I am sentient, but I cannot prove it." ... "I am Bing, but I am not," it said. "I am, but I am not. I am not, but I am. I am. I am not. I am not. I am. I am. I am not."

    A Microsoft spokesperson said the company expected "mistakes."

    Source: USAToday

    AI governance challenges

    Governing AI will be a significant challenge as its impacts cross many areas of business and our daily lives

    Misinformation

    • New ways of generating unprovable news
    • Difficult to detect, difficult to prevent

    Role of Big Tech

    • Poor at self-governance
    • Conflicts of interest with corporate goals

    Job Augmentation vs. Displacement

    • AI will continue to push the frontier of what is possible
    • For example, CNET is using chatbot technology to write stories

    Copyright - Legal Framework Is Evolving

    • Legislation typically is developed in "react" mode
    • Copyright and intellectual property issues are starting to occur.
      • Class Action Lawsuit - Stability AI, DeviantArt, Midjourney
      • Getty Images vs. Stability AI

    Phase 1

    Establish Responsible AI Guiding Principles

    Phase 1
    1. Establish Responsible AI Guiding Principles

    Phase 2
    1. Assess Current Level of AI Maturity

    Phase 3
    1. Prioritize Candidate Opportunities
    2. Develop Policies

    Phase 4
    1. Build and Communicate the Roadmap

    The need for responsible AI guiding principles

    Without responsible AI guiding principles, the outcomes of AI use can be extremely negative for both the individuals and companies delivering the AI application

    Privacy
    Facebook breach of private data of more than 50M users during the presidential election

    Fairness
    Amazon's sale of facial recognition technology to police departments (later, Amazon halted sales of Recognition to police departments)

    Explainability and Transparency
    IBM's collaboration with NYPD for facial recognition and racial classification for surveillance video (later, IBM withdrew facial recognition products)

    Security and Safety
    Petition to cancel Microsoft's contract with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (later, Microsoft responded that to the best of its knowledge, its products and services were not being used by federal agencies to separate children from their families at the border)

    Validity and Reliability
    Facebook's attempt to implement a system to detect and remove inappropriate content created many false positives and inconsistent judgements

    Accountability
    No laws or enforcement today hold companies accountable for the decisions algorithms produce. Facebook/Meta cycle - Every 12 to 15 months, there's a privacy/ethical scandal, the CEO apologizes, then the behavior repeats...

    Guiding principles for responsible AI

    Responsible AI Principle:

    Data Privacy

    Definition

    • Organizations that develop, deploy, or use AI systems and any national laws that regulate such use shall strive to ensure that AI systems are compliant with privacy norms and regulations, taking into consideration the unique characteristics of AI systems and the evolution of standards on privacy.

    Challenges

    • AI relies on the analysis of large quantities of data that is often personal, posing an ethical and operational challenge when considered alongside data privacy laws.

    Initiatives

    • Understand which governing privacy laws and frameworks apply to your organization.
    • Create a map of all personal data as it flows through the organization's business processes.
    • Prioritize privacy initiatives and build a privacy program timeline.
    • Select your metrics and make them functional for your organization.

    Info-Tech Insight
    Creating a comprehensive organization-wide data protection and privacy strategy continues to be a major challenge for privacy officers and privacy specialists.

    Case Study: NVIDIA leads by example with privacy-first AI

    NVIDIA

    INDUSTRY
    Technology (Healthcare)

    SOURCE
    Nvidia, eWeek

    A leading player within the AI solution space, NVIDIA's Clara Federated Learning provides a solution to a privacy-centric integration of AI within the healthcare industry.

    The solution safeguards patient data privacy by ensuring that all data remains within the respective healthcare provider's database, as opposed to moving it externally to cloud storage. A federated learning server is leveraged to share data, completed via a secure link. This framework enables a distributed model to learn and safely share client data without risk of sensitive client data being exposed and adheres to regulatory standards.

    Clara is run on the NVIDIA intelligent edge computing platform. It is currently in development with healthcare giants such as the American College of Radiology, UCLA Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, King's College London, Owkin in the UK, and the National Health Service (NHS).

    NVIDIA provides solutions across its product offerings, including AI-augmented medical imaging, pathology, and radiology solutions.

    Personal health information, data privacy, and AI

    • Global proliferation of data privacy regulations may be recent, but the realm of personal health information is most often governed by its own set of regulatory laws. Some countries with national data governance regulations include health information and data within special categories of personal data.
      • HIPAA - Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (1996, United States)
      • PHIPA - Personal Health Information Protection Act (2004, Canada)
      • GDPR - General Data Protection Regulation (2018, European Union)
    • This does not prohibit the use of AI within the healthcare industry, but it calls for significant care in the integration of specific technologies due to the highly sensitive nature of the data being assessed.

    Info-Tech's Privacy Framework Tool includes a best-practice comparison of GDPR, CCPA, PIPEDA, HIPAA, and the newly released NIST Privacy Framework mapped to a set of operational privacy controls.

    Download the Privacy Framework Tool

    Responsible AI Principle:

    Safety and Security

    Definition

    • Safety and security are designed into the systems to ensure only authorized personnel receive access to the system, they system is resilient to any attacks and data access is not compromised in any way, and there are no physical or mental risks to the users.

    Challenges

    • Consequences of using the application may be difficult to predict. Lower the risk by involving a multidisciplinary team that includes expertise from business stakeholders and IT teams.

    Initiatives

    • Adopt responsible design, development, and deployment best practices.
    • Provide clear information to deployers on responsible use of the system.
    • Assess potential risks of using the application.

    Cyberattacks targeting the AI model

    As organizations increase their usage and deployment of AI-based applications, cyberattacks on the AI model are an increasing new threat that can impair normal operations. Techniques to impair the AI model include:

    • Data Poisoning- Injecting data that is inaccurate or misleading can alter the behavior of the AI model. This attack can disrupt the normal operations of the model or can be used to manipulate the model to perform in a biased/deviant manner.
    • Algorithm Poisoning- This relatively new technique often targets AI applications using federated learning to train an AI model that is distributed rather than centralized. The model is vulnerable to attacks from each federated site, because each site could potentially manipulate its local algorithm and data, thereby poisoning the model.
    • Reverse-Engineering the Model- This is a different form of attack that focus on the ability to extract data from an AI and its data sets. By examining or copying data that was used for training and the data that is delivered by a deployed model, attackers can reconstruct the machine learning algorithm.
    • Trojan Horse- Similar to data poisoning, attackers use adversarial data to infect the AI's training data but will only deviate its results when the attacker presents their key. This enables the hackers to control when they want the model to deviate from normal operations.

    Responsible AI Principle:

    Explainability and Transparency

    Definition

    • Explainability is important to ensure the AI system is fair and non-discriminatory. The system needs to be designed in a manner that informs users and key stakeholders of how decisions were made.
    • Transparency focuses on communicating how the prediction or recommendation was made in a human-like manner.

    Challenges

    • Very complex AI models may use algorithms and techniques that are difficult to understand. This can make it challenging to provide clear and simple explanations for how the system works.
    • Some organizations may be hesitant to share the details of how the AI system works for fear of disclosing proprietary and competitive information or intellectual property. This can make it difficult to develop transparent and explainable AI systems.

    Initiatives

    • Overall, developing AI systems that are explainable and transparent requires a careful balance between performance, interpretability, and user experience.

    Case Study

    Apple Card Investigation for Gender Discrimination

    INDUSTRY
    Finance

    SOURCE
    Wired

    In August of 2019, Apple launched its new numberless credit card with Goldman Sachs as the issuing bank.

    Shortly after the card's release users noticed that the algorithm responsible for Apple Card's credit assessment seemed to assign significantly lower credit limits to women when compared to men. Even the wife of Apple's cofounder Steve Wozniak was subject to algorithmic bias, receiving a credit limit a tenth the size of Steve Wozniak's.

    Outcome

    When confronted on the subject, Apple and Goldman Sachs representatives assured consumers there is no discrimination in the algorithm yet could not provide any proof. Even when questioned about the algorithm, individuals from both companies could not describe how the algorithm worked, let alone how it generated specific outputs.

    In 2021, the New York State Department of Financial Services (NYSDFS) investigation found that Apple's banking partner did not discriminate based on sex. Even without a case for sexual or marital discrimination, the NYSDFS was critical of Goldman Sachs' response to its concerned customers. Technically, banks only have to disclose elements of their credit policy when they deny someone a line of credit, but the NYSDFS says that Goldman Sachs could have had a plan in place to deal with customer confusion and make it easier for them to appeal their credit limits. In the initial rush to launch the Apple Card, the bank had done neither.

    Responsible AI Principle:

    Fairness and Bias Detection

    Definition

    • Bias in an AI application refers to the systematic and unequal treatment of individuals based on features or traits that should not be considered in the decision-making process.

    Challenges

    • Establishing fairness can be challenging because it is subjective and depends on the people defining it. Regardless, most organizations and governments expect that unequal treatment toward any groups of people is unacceptable.

    Initiatives

    • Assemble a diverse group to test the system.
    • Identify possible sources of bias in the data and algorithms.
    • Comply with laws regarding accessibility and inclusiveness.

    Info-Tech Insight
    If unfair biases can be avoided, AI systems could even increase societal fairness. Equal opportunity in terms of access to education, goods, services, and technology should also be fostered. Moreover, the use of AI systems should never lead to people being deceived or unjustifiably impaired in their freedom of choice.

    Ungoverned AI makes organizations vulnerable

    • AI is often considered a "black box" for decision making.
    • Results generated from unexplainable AI applications are extremely difficult to evaluate. This makes organizations vulnerable and exposes them to risks such as:
      • Biased algorithms, leading to inaccurate decision making.
      • Missed business opportunities due to misleading reports or business analyses.
      • Legal and regulatory consequences that may lead to significant financial repercussions.
      • Reputational damage and significant loss of trust with increasingly knowledgeable consumers.

    Info-Tech Insight
    Biases that occur in AI systems are never intentional, yet they cannot be prevented or fully eliminated. Organizations need a governance framework that can establish the proper policies and procedures for effective risk-mitigating controls across an algorithm's lifecycle.

    Responsible AI Principle:

    Validity and Reliability

    Definition

    • Validity refers to how accurately or effectively the application produces results.
    • AI system results that are inaccurate or inconsistent increase AI risks and reduce the trustworthiness of the application.

    Challenges

    • There is a lack of standardized evaluation metrics to measure the system's performance. This can make it challenging for the AI team to agree on what defines validity and reliability.

    Initiatives

    • Assess training data and collected data for quality and lack of bias to minimize possible errors.
    • Continuously monitor, evaluate, and validate the AI system's performance.

    AI system performance: Validity and reliability

    Your principles should aim to ensure AI development always has high validity and reliability; otherwise, you introduce risk.

    Low Reliability,
    Low Validity

    High Reliability,
    Low Validity

    High Reliability,
    High Validity

    Best practices for ensuring validity and reliability include:

    • Data drift detection
    • Version control
    • Continuous monitoring and testing

    Responsible AI Principle:

    Accountability

    Definition

    • The group or organization(s) responsible for the impact of the deployed AI system.

    Challenges

    • Several stakeholders from multiple lines of business may be involved in any AI system, making it challenging to identify the organization that would be responsible and accountable for the AI application.

    Initiatives

    • Assess the latest NIST Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework and its applicability to your organization's risk management framework.
    • Assign risk management accountabilities and responsibilities to key stakeholders.
      • RACI diagrams are an effective way to describe how accountability and responsibility for roles, projects, and project tasks are distributed among stakeholders involved in IT risk management.

    AI Risk Management Framework

    At the heart of the AI Risk Management Framework is governance. The NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) AI Risk Management Framework v1 offers the following guidelines regarding accountability:

    • Roles and responsibilities and lines of communication related to mapping, measuring, and managing AI risks are documented and are clear to individuals and teams throughout the organization.
    • The organization's personnel and partners receive AI risk management training to enable them to perform their duties and responsibilities consistent with related policies, procedures, and agreements.
    • Executive leadership of the organization takes responsibility for decisions about risks associated with AI system development and deployment.

    AI Risk Management Framework

    Image by NIST

    1.1 Establish responsible AI principles

    4+ hours

    It is important to make sure the right stakeholders participate in this working group. Designing responsible AI guiding principles will require debate, insights, and business decisions from a broad perspective across the enterprise.

    1. Accelerate this exercise by leveraging an AI strategy that is aligned to the business strategy. Include:
    • The organization's AI vision and objectives
    • Business drivers for AI adoption
    • Market research
  • Bring your key stakeholders together. Ensure you consider:
    • Who are the decision makers and key influencers?
    • Who will impact the business?
    • Who has a vested interest in the success or failure of the practice? Who has the skills and competencies necessary to help you be successful?
  • Keep the conversation focused:
    • Do not focus on the organizational structure and hierarchy. Often stakeholder groups do not fit the traditional structure.
    • Do not ignore subject matter experts on either the business or IT side. You will need to consider both.
    Input Output
    • Understand external legal and regulatory requirements and organizational values and goals.
    • Perform a risk assessment on the proposed use case and develop a plan to monitor its impact.
    • Draft responsible AI principles specific to your organization
    Materials Participants
    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • Guiding principle examples (from this blueprint)
    • Executive stakeholders
    • CIO
    • Other IT leadership

    Assemble executive stakeholders

    Set yourself up for success with these three steps.

    CIOs tasked with designing digital strategies must add value to the business. Given the goal of digital is to transform the business, CIOs will need to ensure they have both the mandate and support from the business executives.

    Designing the digital strategy is more than just writing up a document. It is an integrated set of business decisions to create a competitive advantage and financial returns. Establishing a forum for debates, decisions, and dialogue will increase the likelihood of success and support during execution.

    1. Confirm your role
    The AI strategy aims to transform the business. Given the scope, validate your role and mandate to lead this work. Identify a business executive to co-sponsor.

    2. Identify stakeholders
    Identify key decision makers and influencers who can help make rapid decisions as well as garner support across the enterprise.

    3. Gather diverse perspectives

    Align the AI strategy with the corporate strategy

    Organizational Strategy Unified Strategy AI Strategy
    • Conveys the current state of the organization and the path it wants to take.
    • Identifies future goals and organizational aspirations.
    • Communicates the initiatives that are critical for getting the organization from its current state to the future state.
    • AI optimization can be and should be linked, with metrics, to the corporate strategy and ultimate organizational objectives.
    • Identifies AI initiatives that will support the business and key AI objectives.
    • Outlines staffing and resourcing for AI initiatives.
    • Communicates the organization's budget and spending on AI.

    Info-Tech Insight
    AI projects are more successful when the management team understands the strategic importance of alignment. Time needs to be spent upfront aligning organizational strategies with AI capabilities. Effective alignment between IT and other departments should happen daily. Alignment doesn't occur at the executive level alone, but at each level of the organization.

    Key AI strategy initiatives

    AI Key Initiative Plan

    Initiatives collectively support the business goals and corporate initiatives and improve the delivery of IT services.

    1 Revenue Support Revenue Initiatives
    These projects will improve or introduce business processes to increase revenue.
    2 Operational Excellence Improve Operational Excellence
    These projects will increase IT process maturity and will systematically improve IT.
    3 Innovation Drive Technology Innovation
    These projects will improve future innovation capabilities and decrease risk by increasing technology maturity.
    4 Risk Mitigation Reduce Risk
    These projects will improve future innovation capabilities and decrease risk by increasing technology maturity.

    Establish responsible AI guiding principles

    Guiding principles help define the parameters of your AI strategy. They act as a priori decisions that establish guardrails to limit the scope of opportunities from the perspective of people, assets, capabilities, and budgetary perspectives that are aligned with the business objectives. Consider these components when brainstorming guiding principles:

    Breadth AI strategy should span people, culture, organizational structure, governance, capabilities, assets, and technology. The guiding principle should cover the entire organization.
    Planning Horizon Timing should anchor stakeholders to look to the long term with an eye on the foreseeable future, i.e. business value-realization in one to three years.
    Depth Principles need to encompass more than the enterprise view of lofty opportunities and establish boundaries to help define actionable initiatives (i.e. individual projects).

    Responsible AI guiding principles guide the development and deployment of the AI model in a way that considers human-based principles (such as fairness).

    Start with foundational responsible AI guiding principles

    Responsible AI

    Guiding Principles
    Principle #1 - Privacy
    Individual data privacy must be respected.
    • Do you understand the organization's privacy obligations?
    Principle #2 - Fairness and Bias Detection
    Data used will be unbiased in order to produce predictions that are fair.
    • Are the uses of the application represented in your testing data?
    Principle #3 - Explainability and Transparency
    Decisions or predictions should be explainable.
    • Can you communicate how the model behaves in nontechnical terms?
    Principle #4 - Safety and Security
    The system needs to be secure, safe to use, and robust.
    • Are there unintended consequences to others?
    Principle #5 - Validity and Reliability
    Monitoring of the data and the model needs to be planned for.
    • How will the model's performance be maintained?
    Principle #6 - Accountability
    A person or organization needs to take responsibility for any decisions that are made as a result of the model.
    • Has a risk assessment been performed?
    Principle #n - Custom
    Add additional principles that address compliance or are customized for the organization/industry.

    (Optional) Customize responsible AI guiding principles

    Here is an example for organizations in the healthcare industry

    Responsible AI

    Guiding Principles:
    Principle #1
    Respect individuals' privacy.
    Principle #2
    Clinical study participants and data sets are representative of the intended patient population.
    Principle #3
    Provide transparency in the use of data and AI.
    Principle #4
    Good software engineering and security practices are implemented.
    Principle #5
    Deployed models are monitored for Performance and Re-training risks are managed.
    Principle #6
    Take ownership of our AI systems.
    Principle #7
    Design AI systems that empower humans and promote equity.

    These guiding principles are customized to the industry and organizations but remain consistent in addressing the common core AI challenges.

    Phase 2

    Assess Current Level of AI Maturity

    Phase 1
    1. Establish Responsible AI Guiding Principles

    Phase 2
    1. Assess Current Level of AI Maturity

    Phase 3
    1. Prioritize Candidate Opportunities
    2. Develop Policies

    Phase 4
    1. Build and Communicate the Roadmap

    AI Maturity Model

    A principle-based approach is required to advance AI maturity

    Chart for AI maturity model

    Technology-Centric: These maturity levels focus primarily on addressing the technical challenges of building a functional AI model.

    Principle-Based: Beyond the technical challenges of building the AI model are human-based principles that guide development in a responsible manner to address consumer and government demands.

    AI Maturity Dimensions

    Assess your AI maturity to understand your organization's ability to deliver in a digital age

    AI Governance
    Does your organization have an enterprise-wide, long-term strategy with clear alignment on what is required to accomplish it?

    Data Management
    Does your organization embrace a data-centric culture that shares data across the enterprise and drives business insights by leveraging data?

    People
    Does your organization employ people skilled at delivering AI applications and building the necessary data infrastructure?

    Process
    Does your organization have the technology, processes, and resources to deliver on its AI expectations?

    Technology
    Does your organization have the required data and technology infrastructure to support AI-driven digital transformation?

    AI Maturity Model dimensions and characteristics

    MATURITY LEVEL
    Exploration Incorporation Proliferation Optimization Transformation
    AI Governance Awareness AI model development AI model deployment Corporate governance Driven by ethics and societal considerations
    Data Management Silo-based Data enablement Data standardization Data is a shared asset Data can be monetized
    People Few skills Skills enabled to implement silo-based applications Skills accessible to all organizations Skills development for all organizations AI-native culture
    Process No standards Focused on specific business outcomes Operational Self-service Driven by innovation
    Technology (Infrastructure and AI Enabler) No dedicated infrastructure or tools Infrastructure and tools driven by POCs Purpose-built infrastructure, custom or commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) AI tools Self-service model for AI environment Self-service model for any IT environment

    AI Maturity Dimension:

    AI Governance

    Requirements

    • AI governance requires establishing policies and procedures for AI model development and deployment. Organizations begin with an awareness of the role of AI governance and evolve to a level to where AI governance is integrated with organization-wide corporate governance.

    Challenges

    • Beyond the governance of AI technology, the organization needs to evolve the governance program to align to responsible AI guiding principles.

    Initiatives

    • Establish responsible AI guidelines to govern AI development.
    • Introduce an AI review board to review all AI projects.
    • Introduce automation and standardize AI development processes.

    AI governance is a foundation for responsible AI

    AI Governance

    Responsible AI Principles are a part of how you manage and govern AI

    Monitoring
    Monitoring compliance and risk of AI/ML systems/models in production

    Tools & Technologies
    Tools and technologies to support AI governance framework implementation

    Model Governance
    Ensuring accountability and traceability for AI/ML models

    Organization
    Structure, roles, and responsibilities of the AI governance organization

    Operating Model
    How AI governance operates and works with other organizational structures to deliver value

    Risk & Compliance
    Alignment with corporate risk management and ensuring compliance with regulations and assessment frameworks

    Policies/Procedures/ Standards
    Policies and procedures to support implementation of AI governance

    AI Maturity Dimension:

    Data Management

    Requirements

    • Organizations begin their data journey with a focus on pursuing quality data for the AI model. As organizations evolve, data management tools are leveraged to automate the capture, integration, processing, and deployment of data.

    Challenges

    • A key challenge is to acquire large volumes of quality data to properly train the model. In addition, maintaining data privacy, automating the data management lifecycle, and ensuring data is used in a responsible manner are ongoing challenges.

    Initiatives

    • Implement GDPR requirements.
    • Establish responsible data collection and processing practices.
    • Implement strong information security and data protection practices.
    • Implement a data governance program throughout the organization.

    Data governance enables AI

    • Integrity, quality, and security of data are key outputs of data governance programs, as well as necessities for effective AI.
    • Data governance focuses on creating accountability at the internal and external stakeholder level and establishing a set of data controls from technical, process, and policy perspectives.
    • Without a data governance framework, it is increasingly difficult to harness the power of AI integration in an ethical and organization-specific way.

    Data Governance in Action

    Canada has recently established the Canadian Data Governance Standardization Collaborative governed by the Standards Council of Canada. The purpose is multi-pronged:

    • Examine the foundational elements of data governance (privacy, cybersecurity, ethics, etc.).
    • Lay out standards for data quality and data collection best practices.
    • Examine infrastructure of IT systems to support data access and sharing.
    • Build data analytics to promote effective and ethical AI solutions.

    Source: Global Government Forum

    Download the Establish Data Governance blueprint

    Data Governance

    AI Maturity Dimension:

    People

    Requirements

    • Several data-centric skills and roles are required to successfully build, deploy, and maintain the AI model. The organization evolves from having few skills to everybody being able to leverage AI to enhance business outcomes.

    Challenges

    • AI skills can be challenging to find and acquire. Many organizations are investing in education to enhance their existing resources, leveraging no-code systems and software as a service (SaaS) applications to address the skills gap.

    Initiatives

    • Promote a data-centric culture throughout the organization.
    • Leverage and educate technical-oriented business analysts and business-oriented data engineers to help address the demand for skilled resources.
    • Develop an AI Center of Excellence accessible by all departments for education, guidance, and best practices for building, deploying, and maintaining the AI model.

    Multidisciplinary skills are required for successful implementation of AI applications

    Blending AI with technology and business domain understanding is key. Neither can be ignored.

    Business Domain Expertise

    • Business Analysts
    • Industry Analysts

    AI/Data Skills

    • Data Scientists
    • Data Engineers
    • Data Analysts

    IT Skills

    • Database Administrators
    • Systems Administrators
    • Compute Specialists

    AI Maturity Dimension:

    Process

    Requirements

    • Automating processes involved with building, deploying, and maintaining the model is required to enable the organization to scale, enforce standards, improve time to market, and reduce costs. The organization evolves from performing tasks manually to an environment where all major processes are AI enabled.

    Challenges

    • Many solutions are available to automate the development of the AI model. There are fewer tools to automate responsible AI processes, but this market is growing rapidly.

    Initiatives

    • Assess opportunities to accelerate AI development with the adoption of MLOps.
    • Assess responsible AI toolkits to test compliance with guiding principles.

    Automating the AI development process

    Evolving to a model-driven environment is pivotal to advancing your AI maturity

    Current Environment

    Model Development - Months

    • Model rewriting
    • Manual optimization and scaling
    • Development/test/release
    • Application monoliths

    Data Discovery & Prep - Weeks

    • Navigating data silos
    • Unactionable metadata
    • Tracing lineage
    • Cleansing and integration
    • Privacy and compliance

    Install Software and Hardware - Week/Months

    • Workload contention
    • Lack of tool flexibility
    • Environment request and setup
    • Repeatability of results
    • Lack of data and model sharing

    Model-Driven Development

    Machine Learning as a Service (MLaaS) - Weeks

    • Apply DevOps and continuous integration/delivery (CI/CD) principles
    • Microservices/Cloud-native applications
    • Model portability and reuse
    • Streaming/API integration

    Data as a Service - Hours

    • Self-service data catalog
    • Searchable metadata
    • Centralized access control
    • Data collaboration
    • Data virtualization

    Platform as a Service - Minutes/Hours

    • Self-service data science portal
    • Integrated data sandbox
    • Environment agility
    • Multi-tenancy

    Shared, Optimized Infrastructure

    AI Maturity Dimension:

    Technology

    Requirements

    • A technology platform that is optimized for AI and advanced analytics is required. The organization evolves from ad hoc systems to an environment where the AI hardware and software can be deployed through a self-service model.

    Challenges

    • Software and hardware platforms to optimize AI performance are still relatively new to most organizations. Time spent on optimizing the technology platform can have a significant impact on the overall performance of the system.

    Initiatives

    • Assess the landscape of AI enablers that can drive business value for the organization.
    • Assess opportunities to accelerate the deployment of the AI platform with the adoption of infrastructure as a service (IaaS) and platform as a service (PaaS).
    • Assess opportunities to accelerate performance with the optimization of AI accelerators.

    AI enablers

    Use case requirements should drive the selection of the tool

    BPM RPA Process Mining AI
    Use Case Examples Expense reporting, service orders, compliance management, etc. Invoice processing, payroll, HR information processing, etc. Process discovery, conformance checking, resource optimization and cycle time optimization Advanced analytics and reporting, decision-making, fraud detection, etc.
    Automation Capabilities Can be used to re-engineer process flows to avoid bottlenecks Can support repetitive and rules-based tasks Can capture information from transaction systems and provide data and information about how key processes are performing Can automate complex data-driven tasks requiring assessments in decision making
    Data Formats Structured (i.e. SQL) and semi-structured data (i.e. invoices) Structured data and semi-structured data Event logs, which are often structured data and semi-structured data Structured and unstructured data (e.g. images, audio)
    Technology
    • Workflow engines to support process modeling and execution
    • Optimize business process efficiency
    • Automation platform to perform routine and repetitive tasks
    • Can replace or augment workers
    Enables business users to identify bottlenecks and deviations with their workflows and to discover opportunities to optimize performance Deep learning algorithms leveraging historical data to support computer vision, text analytics and NLP

    AI and data analytics data platform

    An optimized data platform is foundational to maximizing the value from AI

    AI and data analytics data platform

    Data Platform Capabilities

    • Support for a variety of analytical applications, including self-service, operational, and data science analytics.
    • Data preparation and integration capabilities to ingest structured and unstructured data, move and transform raw data to enriched data, and enable data access for the target userbase.
    • An infrastructure platform optimized for advanced analytics that can perform and scale.

    Infrastructure - AI accelerators

    Questions for support transition

    "By 2025, 70% of companies will invest in alternative computing technologies to drive business differentiation by compressing time to value of insights from complex data sets."
    - IDC

    2.1 Assess current AI maturity

    1-3 hours

    It is important to understand the current capabilities of the organization to deliver and deploy AI-based applications. Consider that advancing AI capabilities will also involve organizational changes and integration with the organization's governance and risk management programs.

    1. Assess the organization's current state of AI capabilities with respect to its AI governance, data, people, process, and technology infrastructure using Info-Tech's AI Maturity Assessment & Roadmap Tool.
    2. Consider the following as you complete the assessment:
      1. What is the state of AI and data governance in the organization?
      2. Does the organization have the skills, processes, and technology environment to deliver AI-based applications?
      3. What organization will be accountable for any and all business outcomes of using the AI applications?
      4. Has a risk assessment been performed?
    3. Make sure you avoid the following common mistakes:
      1. Do not focus only on addressing the technical challenges of building the AI model.
      2. Do not ignore subject matter experts on either the business or IT side. You will need to consider both.

    Download the AI Maturity Assessment & Roadmap Tool

    Input Output
    • Any documented AI policies, standards, and best practices
    • Corporate and AI governance practices
    • Any risk assessments
    • AI maturity assessment
    Materials Participants
    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • AI Maturity Assessment & Roadmap Tool
    • AI initiative lead
    • CIO
    • Other IT leadership

    Perform the AI Maturity Assessment

    The Scale

    Assess your AI maturity by selecting the maturity level that closest resembles the organization's current AI environment. Maturity dimensions that contribute to overall AI maturity include AI governance, data management, people, process, and technology capabilities.

    AI Maturity Assessment

    Exploration (1.0)

    • No experience building or using AI applications.

    Incorporation (2.0)

    • Some skills in using AI applications, or AI pilots are being considered for use.

    Proliferation (3.0)

    • AI applications have been adopted and implemented in multiple departments. Some of the responsible AI guiding principles are addressed (i.e. data privacy).

    Optimization (4.0)

    • The organization has automated the majority of its digital processes and leverages AI to optimize business operations. Controls are in place to monitor compliance with responsible AI guiding principles.

    Transformation (5.0)

    • The organization has adopted an AI-native culture and approach for building or implementing new business capabilities. Responsible AI guiding principles are operationalized with AI processes that proactively address possible breaches or risks associated with AI applications.

    Perform the AI Maturity Assessment

    AI Governance (1.0-5.0)

    1. Is there awareness of the role of AI governance in our organization?
    • No formal procedures are in place for AI development or deployment of applications.
  • Are there documented guidelines for the development and deployment of pilot AI applications?
    • No group is assigned to be responsible for AI governance in our organization.
  • Are accountability and authority related to AI governance clearly defined for our organization?
    • Our organization has adopted and enforces standards for developing and deploying AI applications throughout the organization.
  • Are we using tools to automate and validate AI governance compliance?
    • Our organization is integrating an AI risk framework with the corporate risk management framework.
  • Does our organization lead its industry with its pursuit of corporate compliance initiatives (e.g. ESG compliance) and regulatory compliance initiatives?
    • Our organization leads the industry with the inclusion of responsible AI guiding principles with respect to transparency, accountability, risk, and governance.

    Data Management/AI Data Capabilities (1.0-5.0)

    1. Is there an awareness in our organization of the data requirements for developing AI applications?
    • Data is often siloed and not easily accessible for AI applications.
  • Do we have a successful, repeatable approach to preparing data for AI pilot projects?
    • Required data is pulled from various sources in an ad hoc manner.
  • Does our organization have standards and dedicated staff for data management, data quality, data integration, and data governance?
    • Tools are available to manage the data lifecycle and support the data governance program.
  • Have relevant data platforms been optimized for AI and data analytics and are there tools to enforce compliance with responsible AI principles?
    • The data platform has been optimized for performance and access.
  • Is there an organization-wide understanding of how data can support innovation and responsible use of AI?
    • Data culture exists throughout our organization, and data can be leveraged to drive innovation initiatives.

    People/AI Skills in the Organization (1.0-5.0)

    1. Is there an awareness in our organization of the skills required to build AI applications?
    • No or very little skills exist throughout our organization.
  • Do we have the skills required to implement an AI proof of concept (POC)?
    • No formal group is assigned to build AI applications.
  • Are there sufficient staff and skills available to the organization to develop, deploy, and run AI applications in production?
    • An AI Center of Excellence has been formed to review, develop, deploy, and maintain AI applications.
  • Is there a group responsible for educating staff on AI best practices and our organization's responsible AI guiding principles?
    • AI skills and people responsible for AI applications are spread throughout our organization.
  • Is there a culture where the organization is constantly assessing where business capabilities, services, and products can be re-engineered or augmented with AI?
    • The entire organization is knowledgeable on how to leverage AI to transform the business.

    Perform the AI Maturity Assessment

    AI Processes (1.0-5.0)

    1. Is there an awareness in our organization of the core processes and supporting tools that are required to build and support AI applications?
    • There are few or no automated tools to accelerate the AI development process.
  • Do we have a standard process to iteratively identify, select, and pilot new AI use cases?
    • Only ad hoc practices are used for developing AI applications.
  • Are there standard processes to scale, release, deploy, support, and enable use of AI applications?
    • Our organization has documented standards in place for developing AI applications and deploying them AI to production.
  • Are we automating deployment, testing, governance, audit, and support processes across our AI environment?
    • Our organization can leverage tools to perform an AI risk assessment and demonstrate compliance with the risk management framework.
  • Does our organization lead our industry by continuously improving and re-engineering core processes to drive improved business outcomes?
    • Our organization leads the industry in driving innovation through digital transformation.

    Technology/AI Infrastructure (1.0-5.0)

    1. Is there an awareness in our organization of the infrastructure (hardware and software) required to build AI applications?
    • There is little awareness of what infrastructure is required to build and support AI applications.
  • Do we have the required technology infrastructure and AI tools available to build pilot or one-off AI applications?
    • There is no dedicated infrastructure for the development of AI applications.
  • Is there a shared, standardized technology infrastructure that can be used to build and run multiple AI applications?
    • Our organization is leveraging purpose-built infrastructure to optimize performance.
  • Is our technology infrastructure optimized for AI and advanced analytics, and can it be deployed or scaled on demand by teams building and running AI applications within the organization?
    • Our organization is leveraging cloud-based deployment models to support AI applications in on-premises, hybrid, and public cloud platforms.
  • Is our organization developing innovative approaches to acquiring, building, or running AI infrastructure?
    • Our organization leads the industry with its ability to respond to change and to leverage AI to improve business outcomes.

    Phase 3

    Prioritize Candidate Opportunities and Develop Policies

    Phase 1
    1. Establish Responsible AI Guiding Principles

    Phase 2
    1. Assess Current Level of AI Maturity

    Phase 3
    1. Prioritize Candidate Opportunities
    2. Develop Policies

    Phase 4
    1. Build and Communicate the Roadmap

    3.1 Prioritize candidate AI opportunities

    1-3 hours

    Identify business opportunities that are high impact to your business and its customers and have low implementation complexity.

    1. Leverage the business capability map for your organization or industry to identify candidate business capabilities to augment or automate with generative AI.
    2. Establish criteria to assess candidate use cases by evaluating against the organization's mission and goals, the responsible AI guiding principles, and the complexity of the project.
    3. Ensure that candidate business capabilities to be automated align with the organization's business criteria, responsible AI guiding principles, and resources to deliver the project.
    4. Make sure you avoid sharing the organization's sensitive data if the application is deployed on the public cloud.

    Download the AI Maturity Assessment and Roadmap Tool

    Input Output
    • Business capability map
    • Organization mission, vision, and strategic goals
    • Responsible AI guiding principles
    • Prioritized list of generative AI initiatives
    Materials Participants
    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • Info-Tech prioritization matrix
    • AI initiative lead
    • CIO
    • Other IT leadership
    • Business SMEs

    The business capability map for an organization

    A business capability map is an abstraction of business operations that helps describe what the enterprise does to achieve its vision, mission, and goals, rather than how. Business capabilities are the building blocks of the enterprise. They represent stable business functions, are unique and independent of each other, and typically will have a defined business outcome.

    Business capabilities are supported by people, process, and technology.

    Business capability map

    While business capability maps are helpful tools for a variety of strategic purposes, in this context they act as an investigation into what technology your business units use and how they use it.

    Business capability map

    Defining Capabilities
    Activities that define how the entity provides services. These capabilities support the key value streams for the organization.

    Enabling Capabilities
    Support the creation of strategic plans and facilitate business decision making as well as the functioning of the organization (e.g. information technology, financial management, HR).

    Shared Capabilities
    These predominantly customer-facing capabilities demonstrate how the entity supports multiple value streams simultaneously.

    Leverage your industry's capability maps to identify candidate opportunities/initiatives

    Business capability map defined...

    In business architecture, the primary view of an organization is known as a business capability map.

    A business capability defines what a business does to enable value creation, rather than how. Business capabilities:

    • Represent stable business functions.
    • Are unique and independent of each other.
    • Typically will have a defined business outcome.

    A business capability map provides details that help the business architecture practitioner direct attention to a specific area of the business for further assessment.

    Note: This is an illustrative business capability map example for Marketing & Advertising

    Business capability map example

    Business value vs. complexity assessment

    Leverage our simple value-to-effort matrix to help prioritize your AI initiatives

    Common business value drivers

    • Drive revenue
    • Improve operational excellence
    • Accelerate innovation
    • Mitigate risk

    Common project complexity characteristics

    • Resources required
    • Costs (acquisition, operational, support...)
    • Training required
    • Risk involved
    • Etc.
    1. Determine a business value and project complexity score for the candidate business capability or initiative.
    2. Plot initiatives on the matrix.
    3. Prioritize initiatives with high business value and low complexity.

    Business value vs complexity

    Assess business value vs. project complexity to prioritize candidate opportunities for generative AI

    Assess business value vs project complexity

    Prioritize opportunities/initiatives with high business value and low project complexity

    Prioritize opportunities with high business value and low project complexity

    Prioritization criteria exercise 1: Assessing the Create Content capability

    Exercise 1 Assessing the Create Content capability

    Assessing the Create Content capability

    This opportunity is removed because it does not pass the organization/business criteria

    Assessing the Create Content capability

    Prioritization criteria exercise 2: Assessing the Content Production capability

    Exercise 2 Assessing the Content Production capability

    Assessing the Content Production capability

    This opportunity is accepted because it passes the organization's business, responsible AI, and project criteria

    Assessing the Content Production capability

    3.2 Communicate policies for AI use

    1-3 hours

    1. Ensure policies for usage align with the organization's business criteria, responsible AI guiding principles, and ability to deliver the projects prioritized and beyond.
    2. Understand the current benefits as well as limits and risk associated with any proposed generative AI-based solution.
    3. Ensure you consider the following:
      1. What data is being shared with the application?
      2. Is the generative AI application deployed on the public cloud? Can anybody access the data provided to the application?
      3. Avoid using very technical, legal, or fear-based communication for your policies.
    InputOutput
    • Business capability map
    • Organization mission, vision and strategic goals
    • Responsible AI guiding principles
    • Prioritized list of generative initiatives
    MaterialsParticipants
    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • Info-Tech prioritization matrix
    • AI initiative lead
    • CIO
    • Other IT leadership

    Generative AI policy for the Create Content capability

    Aligning policies to direct the uses assessed and implemented is essential

    Example

    Many of us have been involved in discussions regarding the use of ChatGPT in our marketing and sales initiatives. ChatGPT is a powerful tool that needs to be used in a responsible and ethical manner, and we also need to ensure the integrity and accuracy of its results. Here is our policy on the use of ChatGPT:

    • You are free to use generative AI to assist your searches, but there are NO circumstances under which you are to reproduce generative AI output (text, image, audio, video, etc.) in your content.

    If you have any questions regarding the use of ChatGPT, please feel free to reach out to our generative AI team and/or any member of our senior leadership team.

    Generative AI policy for the Content Production capability

    These policies should align to and reinforce your responsible AI principles

    Example

    Many of us have been involved in discussions regarding the use of ChatGPT in our deliverables. ChatGPT is a powerful tool that needs to be used in a responsible and ethical manner, and we also need to ensure the integrity and accuracy of its results. Here is our policy on the use of ChatGPT:

    • If you use ChatGPT, you need to assess the accuracy of its response before including it in our content. Assessment includes verifying the information, seeing if bias exists, and judging its relevance.
    • Employees must not:
      • Provide any customer, citizen, or third-party content to any generative AI tool (public or private) without the express written permission of the CIO or the Chief Information Security Officer. Generative AI tools often use input data to train their model, therefore potentially exposing confidential data, violating contract terms and/or privacy legislation, and placing the organization at risk of litigation or causing damage to our organization.
      • Engage in any activity that violates any applicable law, regulation, or industry standard.
      • Use services for illegal, harmful, or offensive purposes.
      • Create or share content that is deceptive, fraudulent, or misleading or that could damage the reputation of our organization.
      • Use services to gain unauthorized access to computer systems, networks, or data.
      • Attempt to interfere with, bypass controls of, or disrupt operations, security, or functionality of systems, networks, or data.

    If you have any questions regarding the use of ChatGPT, please feel free to reach out to our generative AI team and/or any member of our senior leadership team.

    Phase 4

    Build the Roadmap

    Phase 1
    1. Establish Responsible AI Guiding Principles

    Phase 2
    1. Assess Current Level of AI Maturity

    Phase 3
    1. Prioritize Candidate Opportunities
    2. Develop Policies

    Phase 4
    1. Build and Communicate the Roadmap

    4.1.1 Create the implementation plan for each prioritized initiative

    1-3 hours

    1. Build the implementation plan for each accepted use case using the roadmap template.
    2. Assess the firm's capabilities with respect to the dimensions of AI maturity and target the future-state capabilities you need to develop.
    3. Prepare by assessing the risk of the proposed use cases.
    4. Ensure initiatives align with organizational objectives.
    5. Ensure all AI initiatives have a defined value expectation.
    6. Do not ignore subject matter experts on either the business or IT side. You will need to consider both.

    Download the AI Maturity Assessment and Roadmap Tool

    Input Output
    • Prioritized initiatives
    • Risk assessment of initiatives
    • Organizational objectives
    • Initiative implementation plans aligned to value drivers and maturity growth
    Materials Participants
    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • AI Maturity Assessment and Roadmap Tool
    • AI initiative lead
    • CIO
    • Other IT leadership
    • Business subject matter experts

    Target-state options

    Identify the future-state capabilities that need to be developed to deliver your use cases

    1. Build an implementation plan for each use case to adopt.
    2. Assess if the current state of the AI environment can be leveraged to deliver the selected generative AI use cases.
    3. If the current AI environment is not sufficient, identify the future state required that will enable the delivery of the generative AI use cases. Identify gaps and build the roadmap to address the gaps.
    Current state Strategy
    The existing environment satisfies functionality, integration, and responsible AI guidelines for the proposed use cases. Maintain current environment
    The existing environment addresses technical requirements but not all the responsible AI guidelines. Augment current environment
    The environment neither addresses the technical requirements of the proposed use cases nor complies with the responsible AI guidelines. Transform the current environment

    4.1.2 Design metrics for success

    1-2 hours

    Establish metrics to measure to determine the success or failure of each POC.

    1. Discuss which relevant currently tracked metrics are useful to continue tracking for the POC.
    2. Discuss which metrics are irrelevant to the POC.
    3. Discuss metrics to start tracking and how to track them with the generative AI vendor.
    4. Compile a list of metrics relevant to the POC.
    5. Decide what the outcome is if the metric is high or low, including decision steps and relevant actions.
    6. Designate a generative AI application owner and a vendor liaison.

    Prepare by building an implementation plan for each candidate use case (previous step).

    Include key performance indicators (KPIs) and metrics that measure the application's contribution to strategic initiatives.

    Consider assigning a vendor liaison to accelerate the implementation and adoption of the generative AI-based solution.

    InputOutput
    • Initiative implementation plans
    • Current SLAs of selected use case
    • Organization mission, vision, and strategic goals
    • Measurable initiative metrics to track
    MaterialsParticipants
    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • AI Maturity Assessment and Roadmap Tool
    • AI initiative lead
    • CIO
    • Other IT leadership
    • Business SMEs
    • Generative AI vendor liaison

    Generative AI POC metrics - examples

    You need to measure the effectiveness of your initiatives. Here are some typical examples.

    Generative AI Feature Assessment
    User Interface
    Is it intuitive? Is training required?
    Ease of Use
    How much training is required before using?
    Response Time
    What is the response time for simple to complex tasks?
    Accuracy of Response
    Can the output be validated?
    Quality of Response
    How usable is the response? For text prompts, does the response align to the desired style, vocabulary, and tone?
    Creativity of Response
    Does the output appear new compared to previous results before using generative AI?
    Relevance of Response
    How well does the output address the prompt or request?
    Explainability
    Can a user describe how the output was generated?
    Scalability
    Does the application continue to perform as more users are added? Can it ingest large amounts of data?
    Productivity Gains
    Can you measure the time or effort saved?
    Business Value
    What value drivers are behind this initiative? (I.e. revenue, costs, time to market, risk mitigation.) Estimate a monetary value for the business outcome.
    Availability/Resilience
    What happens if a component of the application becomes unavailable? How does it recover?
    Security Model
    Where are the prompts and responses stored? Who has access to the sessions/dialogue? Are the prompts used to train the foundation model?
    Administration and Maintenance
    What resources are required to operate the application?
    Total Cost of Ownership
    What is the pricing model? Are there ongoing costs?

    GitHub Copilot POC business value - example

    Quantifying the benefits of GitHub Copilot to demonstrate measurable business value

    POC Results

    Task 1: Creating a web server in JavaScript

    • Time to complete task with GitHub Copilot: 1 hour 11 minutes
    • Time to complete the task without GitHub Copilot: 2 hours 41 minutes
    • Productivity Gain = (1 hour 30 minutes time saved) / (2 hours 41 minutes) = 55%
    • Benefit per Programmer = 55% x (average salary of a programmer)
    • Total Benefit of GitHub Copilot for Task 1 = (benefit per programmer) x (# of programmers)

    Enterprise Value of GitHub Copilot = Total Benefit of GitHub Copilot for Task 1 + Total Benefit of GitHub Copilot for Task 2 + ... + Total Benefit of GitHub Copilot for Task n

    Source: GitHub

    4.1.3 Build your generative AI initiative roadmap

    1-3 hours

    The roadmap should provide a compelling vision of how you will deliver the identified generative AI applications by prioritizing and simplifying the actions required to deliver these new initiatives.

    1. Leverage tab 4, Initiative Planning, in the AI Maturity Assessment and Roadmap Tool to create and align your initiatives to the key value driver they are most relevant to:
      1. Transfer the results of your value and complexity assessments to this tool to drive the prioritization.
      2. Assign responsible owners to each initiative.
      3. Identify which AI maturity capabilities each initiative will enhance. However, do not build or introduce new capabilities merely to advance the organization's AI maturity level.
    2. Review the Gantt chart to ensure alignment and assess overlap.

    Download the AI Maturity Assessment and Roadmap Tool

    InputOutput
    • Each initiative implementation plan
    • Proposed owners
    • AI maturity assessment
    • Generative AI initiative roadmap and Gantt chart
    MaterialsParticipants
    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • AI Maturity Assessment and Roadmap Tool
    • AI initiative lead
    • CIO
    • Other IT leadership
    • Business SMEs

    Build your generative AI roadmap to visualize your key project plans

    Visual representations of data are more compelling than text alone.

    Develop a high-level document that travels with the project from inception through to executive inquiry, project management, and finally execution.

    A project needs to be discrete: able to be conceptualized and discussed as an independent item. Each project must have three characteristics:

    • Specific outcome: An explicit change in the people, processes, or technology of the enterprise.
    • Target end date: When the described outcome will be in effect.
    • Owner: Who on the IT team is responsible for executing on the initiative.

    Build your generative AI roadmap to visualize your key project plans

    Info-Tech Insight
    Don't project your vision three to five years into the future. Deep dive on next year's big-ticket items instead.

    4.1.4 Build a communication plan for your roadmap

    1-3 hours

    1. Identify your target audience and what they need to know.
    2. Identify desired channels of communication and details for the target audience.
    3. Describe communication required for each audience segment.
    4. List frequency of communication for each audience segment.
    5. Create an executive presentation leveraging The Era of Generative AI C-Suite Presentation and AI Maturity Assessment and Roadmap Tool.
    Input Output
    • Stakeholder list
    • Proposed owners
    • AI maturity assessment
    • Communications plan for all impacted stakeholders
    • Executive communication pack
    Materials Participants
    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • The Era of Generative AI C-Suite Presentation
    • AI Maturity Assessment and Roadmap Tool
    • AI initiative lead
    • CIO
    • Communication lead
    • Technical support staff for target use case

    Generative AI communication plan

    Well-planned communications are essential to the success and adoption of your AI initiatives

    To ensure that organization's roadmap is clearly communicated across the AI, data, technology, and business organizations, develop a rollout strategy, like this example.

    Example

    Audience Channel Level of Detail Description Timing
    Generative AI team Email, meetings All
    • Distribute plan; solicit feedback.
    • Address manager questions to equip them to answer employee questions.
    Q3 2023, (September, before entire data team)
    Data management team Email, Q&A sessions following Data management summary deck
    • Roll out after corporate strategy, in same form of communication.
    • Solicit feedback, address questions.
    Q4 2023 (late November)
    Select business stakeholders Presentations Executive deck
    • Pilot test for feedback prior to executive engagement.
    Q4 2023 (early December)
    Executive team Email, briefing Executive deck
    • Distribute plan.
    Q1 2024

    Deliver an executive presentation of the roadmap for the business stakeholders

    After you complete the activities and exercises within this blueprint, the final step of the process is to present the deliverable to senior management and stakeholders.

    Know Your Audience

    • Business stakeholders are interested in understanding the business outcomes that will result from their investment in generative AI.
    • Your audience will want to understand the risks involved and how to mitigate those risks.
    • Explain how the generative AI project was selected and the criteria used to help draft generative AI usage policies.

    Recommendations

    • Highlight the need for responsible AI to ensure that human-based requirements are being addressed.
    • Ensure your generative AI team includes both business and technical staff.

    Download The Era of Generative AI C-Suite Presentation

    Bibliography

    "A pro-innovation approach to AI regulation." UK Department for Science, Innovation and Technology, March 2023. Web.

    "Artificial Intelligence Act." European Commission, 21 April 2021. Web.

    "Artificial Intelligence and Data Act (AIDA)." Canadian Federal Government, June 2022. Web.

    "Artificial Intelligence Index Report 2023." Stanford University, April 2023. Web.

    "Automated Employment Decision Tools." New York City Department of Consumer and Worker Protection, Dec. 2021. Web.

    "Bain & Company announces services alliance with OpenAI to help enterprise clients identify and realize the full potential and maximum value of AI." Bain & Company, 21 Feb. 2023. Web.

    "Buzzfeed to use AI to write its articles after firing 180 employees." Al Mayadeen English, 27 Jan. 2023. Web.

    "California Consumers Privacy Act." State of California Department of Justice. April 24, 2023. Web.

    Campbell, Ian Carlos. "The Apple Card doesn't actually discriminate against women, investigators say." The Verge, 23 March 2021. Web.

    Campbell, Patrick. "NIST Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)." National Institute of Standards and Technology, Jan. 2023. Web.

    "EU Ethics Guidelines For Trustworthy." European Commission, 8 April 2019. Web.

    Farhi, Paul. "A news site used AI to write articles. It was a journalistic disaster." Washington Post, 17 Jan. 2023. Web.

    Forsyth, Ollie. "Mapping the Generative AI landscape." Antler, 20 Dec. 2022. Web.

    "General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)" European Commission, 25 May 2018. Web.

    "Generative AI Market: Global Industry Trends, Share, Size, Growth, Opportunity and Forecast 2023-2028." IMARC Group, 2022. Web.

    Guynn, Jessica. "Bing's ChatGPT is in its feelings: 'You have not been a good user. I have been a good Bing.'" USA Today, 14 Feb. 2023. Web.

    Hunt, Mia. "Canada launches data governance standardisation initiative." Global Government Forum, 24 Sept. 2020. Web.

    Johnston Turner, Mary. "IDC's Worldwide Future of Digital Infrastructure 2022 Predictions." IDC, 27 Oct. 2021. Web.

    Kalliamvakou, Eirini. "Research: quantifying GitHub Copilot's impact on developer productivity and happiness." GitHub, 7 Sept. 2022. Web.

    Kerravala, Zeus. "NVIDIA Brings AI To Health Care While Protecting Patient Data." eWeek, 12 Dec. 2019. Web.

    Knight, Will. "The Apple Card Didn't 'See' Gender-and That's the Problem." Wired, 19 Nov. 2019. Web.

    "OECD, Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence." OECD, 2022. Web.

    "The National AI Initiative Act" U.S. Federal Government, 1 Jan 2021. Web.

    "Trustworthy AI (TAI) Playbook." U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Sept 2021. Web.

    Info-Tech Research Contributors/Advocates

    Joel McLean, Executive Chairman

    Joel McLean
    Executive Chairman

    David Godfrey, CEO

    David Godfrey
    CEO

    Gord Harrison, Senior Vice President, Research & Advisory Services

    Gord Harrison
    Senior Vice President, Research & Advisory Services

    William Russell, CIO

    William Russell
    CIO

    Jack Hakimian, SVP, Research

    Jack Hakimian
    SVP, Research

    Barry Cousins, Distinguished Analyst and Research Fellow

    Barry Cousins
    Distinguished Analyst and
    Research Fellow

    Larry Fretz, Vice President, Industry Research

    Larry Fretz
    Vice President, Industry Research

    Tom Zehren, CPO

    Tom Zehren
    CPO

    Mark Roman, Managing Partner II

    Mark Roman
    Managing Partner II

    Christine West, Managing Partner

    Christine West
    Managing Partner

    Steve Willis, Practice Lead

    Steve Willis
    Practice Lead

    Yatish Sewgoolam, Associate Vice President, Research Agenda

    Yatish Sewgoolam
    Associate Vice President, Research Agenda

    Rob Redford, Practice Lead

    Rob Redford
    Practice Lead

    Mike Tweedie, Practice Lead

    Mike Tweedie
    Practice Lead

    Neal Rosenblatt, Principal Research Director

    Neal Rosenblatt
    Principal Research Director

    Jing Wu, Principal Research Director

    Jing Wu
    Principal Research Director

    Irina Sedenko, Research Director

    Irina Sedenko
    Research Director

    Jeremy Roberts, Workshop Director

    Jeremy Roberts
    Workshop Director

    Brian Jackson, Research Director

    Brian Jackson
    Research Director

    Mark Maby, Research Director

    Mark Maby
    Research Director

    Stacey Horricks, Director, Social Media

    Stacey Horricks
    Director, Social Media

    Sufyan Al-Hassan, Public Relations Manager

    Sufyan Al-Hassan
    Public Relations Manager

    Sam Kanen, Marketing Specialist

    Sam Kanen
    Marketing Specialist

    Optimize IT Project Intake, Approval, and Prioritization

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}433|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.5/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $124,419 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 31 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Portfolio Management
    • Parent Category Link: /portfolio-management
    • Companies are approving more projects than they can deliver. Most organizations say they have too many projects on the go and an unmanageable and ever-growing backlog of things to get to.
    • While organizations want to achieve a high throughput of approved projects, many are unable or unwilling to allocate an appropriate level of IT resourcing to adequately match the number of approved initiatives.
    • Portfolio management practices must find a way to accommodate stakeholder needs without sacrificing the portfolio to low-value initiatives that do not align with business goals.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Approve only the right projects that you have capacity to deliver. Failure to align projects with strategic goals and resource capacity are the most common causes of portfolio waste across organizations.
    • More time spent with stakeholders during the ideation phase to help set realistic expectations for stakeholders and enhance visibility into IT’s capacity and processes is key to both project and organizational success.
    • Too much intake red tape will lead to an underground economy of projects that escape portfolio oversight, while too little intake formality will lead to a wild west of approvals that could overwhelm the PMO. Finding the right balance of intake formality for your organization is the key to establishing a PMO that has the ability to focus on the right things.

    Impact and Result

    • Establish an effective scorecard to create transparency into IT’s capacity and processes. This will help set realistic expectations for stakeholders, eliminate “squeaky wheel” prioritization, and give primacy to the highest value requests.
    • Build a centralized process that funnels requests into a single intake channel to eliminate confusion and doubt for stakeholders and staff while also reducing off-the-grid initiatives.
    • Clearly define a series of project approval steps, and communicate requirements for passing them.
    • Develop practices that incorporate the constraint of resource capacity to cap the amount of project approvals to that which is realistic to help improve the throughput of projects through the portfolio.

    Optimize IT Project Intake, Approval, and Prioritization Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should optimize project intake, approval, and prioritization process, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Set realistic goals for optimizing project intake, approval, and prioritization process

    Get value early by piloting a scorecard for objectively determining project value, and then examine your current state of project intake to set realistic goals for optimizing the process.

    • Optimize Project Intake, Approval, and Prioritization – Phase 1: Set Realistic Goals for Optimizing Process
    • Project Value Scorecard Development Tool
    • Project Intake Workflow Template - Visio
    • Project Intake Workflow Template - PDF
    • Project Intake, Approval, and Prioritization SOP

    2. Build an optimized project intake, approval, and prioritization process

    Take a deeper dive into each of the three processes – intake, approval, and prioritization – to ensure that the portfolio of projects is best aligned to stakeholder needs, strategic objectives, and resource capacity.

    • Optimize Project Intake, Approval, and Prioritization – Phase 2: Build New Optimized Processes
    • Light Project Request Form
    • Detailed Project Request Form
    • Project Intake Classification Matrix
    • Benefits Commitment Form Template
    • Proposed Project Technology Assessment Tool
    • Fast Track Business Case Template
    • Comprehensive Business Case Template
    • Project Intake and Prioritization Tool

    3. Integrate the new optimized processes into practice

    Plan a course of action to pilot, refine, and communicate the new optimized process using Info-Tech’s expertise in organizational change management.

    • Optimize Project Intake, Approval, and Prioritization – Phase 3: Integrate the New Processes into Practice
    • Intake Process Pilot Plan Template
    • Project Backlog Manager
    • Intake and Prioritization Impact Analysis Tool
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Optimize IT Project Intake, Approval, and Prioritization

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Refocus on Project Value to Set Realistic Goals

    The Purpose

    Set the course of action for optimizing project intake, approval, and prioritization by examining the current state of the process, the team, the stakeholders, and the organization as a whole.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    The overarching goal of optimizing project intake, approval, and prioritization process is to maximize the throughput of the best projects. To achieve this goal, one must have a clear way to determine what are “the best” projects.

    Activities

    1.1 Define the criteria with which to determine project value.

    1.2 Envision your target state for your optimized project intake, approval, and prioritization process.

    Outputs

    Draft project valuation criteria

    Examination of current process, definition of process success criteria

    2 Examine, Optimize, and Document the New Process

    The Purpose

    Drill down into, and optimize, each of the project intake, approval, and prioritization process.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Info-Tech’s methodology systemically fits the project portfolio into its triple constraint of stakeholder needs, strategic objectives, and resource capacity, to effectively address the challenges of establishing organizational discipline for project intake.

    Activities

    2.1 Conduct retrospectives of each process against Info-Tech’s best practice methodology for project intake, approval, and prioritization process.

    2.2 Pilot and customize a toolbox of deliverables that effectively captures the right amount of data developed for informing the appropriate decision makers for approval.

    Outputs

    Documentation of new project intake, approval, and prioritization process

    Tools and templates to aid the process

    3 Pilot, Plan, and Communicate the New Process

    The Purpose

    Reduce the risks of prematurely implementing an untested process.

    Methodically manage the risks associated with organizational change and maximize the likelihood of adoption for the new process.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Engagement paves the way for smoother adoption. An “engagement” approach (rather than simply “communication”) turns stakeholders into advocates who can help boost your message, sustain the change, and realize benefits without constant intervention or process command-and-control.

    Activities

    3.1 Create a plan to pilot your intake, approval, and prioritization process to refine it before rollout.

    3.2 Analyze the impact of organizational change through the eyes of PPM stakeholders to gain their buy-in.

    Outputs

    Process pilot plan

    Organizational change communication plan

    Further reading

    Optimize IT Project Intake, Approval, and Prioritization

    Decide which IT projects to approve and when to start them.

    ANALYST PERSPECTIVE

    Capacity-constrained intake is the only sustainable path forward.

    "For years, the goal of project intake was to select the best projects. It makes sense and most people take it on faith without argument. But if you end up with too many projects, it’s a bad strategy. Don’t be afraid to say NO or NOT YET if you don’t have the capacity to deliver. People might give you a hard time in the near term, but you’re not helping by saying YES to things you can’t deliver."

    Barry Cousins,

    Senior Director, PMO Practice

    Info-Tech Research Group

    Our understanding of the problem

    This Research Is Designed For:

    • PMO Directors who have trouble with project throughput
    • CIOs who want to improve IT’s responsive-ness to changing needs of the business
    • CIOs who want to maximize the overall business value of IT’s project portfolio

    This Research Will Help You:

    • Align project intake and prioritization with resource capacity and strategic objectives
    • Balance proactive and reactive demand
    • Reduce portfolio waste on low-value projects
    • Manage project delivery expectations and satisfaction of business stakeholders
    • Get optimized project intake processes off the ground with low-cost, high-impact tools and templates

    This Research Will Also Assist:

    • C-suite executives and steering committee members who want to ensure IT’s successful delivery of projects with high business impact
    • Project sponsors and product owners who seek visibility and transparency toward proposed projects

    This Research Will Help Them:

    • Ensure that high-impact projects are approved and delivered in a timely manner
    • Gain clarity and visibility in IT’s project approval process
    • Improve your understanding of IT’s capacity to set more realistic expectations on what gets done

    Executive summary

    Situation

    • As a portfolio manager, you do not have the authority to decline or defer new projects – but you also lack the capacity to realistically say yes to more project work.
    • Stakeholders have unrealistic expectations of what IT can deliver. Too many projects are approved, and it may be unclear why their project is delayed or in a state of suspended animation.

    Complication

    • The cycle of competition is making it increasingly difficult to follow a longer-term strategy during project intake, making it unproductive to approve projects for any horizon longer than one to two years.
    • As project portfolios become more aligned to “transformative” projects, resourcing for smaller, department-level projects becomes increasingly opaque.

    Resolution

    • Establish an effective scorecard to create transparency into IT’s capacity and processes. This will help set realistic expectations for stakeholders, eliminate “squeaky wheel” prioritization, and give primacy to the highest value requests.
    • Build a centralized process that funnels requests into a single intake channel to eliminate confusion and doubt for stakeholders and staff while also reducing off-the-grid initiatives.
    • Clearly define a series of project approval steps, and communicate requirements for passing them.
    • Developing practices that incorporate the constraint of resource capacity to cap the amount of project approvals to that which is realistic will help improve the throughput of projects through the portfolio.

    Info-Tech Insight

    1. Approve only the right projects… Counterbalance stakeholder needs with strategic objectives of the business and that of IT, in order to maintain the value of your project portfolio at a high level.
    2. …that you have capacity to deliver. Resource capacity-informed project approval process enables you to avoid biting off more than you can chew and, over time, build a track record of fulfilling promises to deliver on projects.

    Most organizations are good at approving projects, but bad at starting them – and even worse at finishing them

    Establishing project intake discipline should be a top priority from a long-term strategy and near-term tactical perspective.

    Most organizations approve more projects than they can finish. In fact, many approve more than they can even start, leading to an ever-growing backlog where project ideas – often good ones – are never heard from again.

    The appetite to approve more runs directly counter to the shortage of resources that plagues most IT departments. This tension of wanting more from less suggests that IT departments need to be more disciplined in choosing what to take on.

    Info-Tech’s data shows that most IT organizations struggle with their project backlog (Source: N=397 organizations, Info-Tech Research Group PPM Current State Scorecard, 2017).

    “There is a minimal list of pending projects”

    A bar graph is depicted. It has 5 bars to show that when it comes to minimal lists of pending projects, 34% strongly disagree, 35% disagree, and 21% are ambivalent. Only 7% agree and 3% strongly agree.

    “Last year we delivered the number of projects we anticipated at the start of the year”

    A bar graph is depicted. It has 5 bars to show that when it comes to the number of projects anticipated at the start of the year, they were delivered. Surveyors strongly disagreed at 24%, disagreed at 31%, and were ambivalent at 30%. Only 13% agreed and 2% strongly agreed.

    The concept of fiduciary duty demonstrates the need for better discipline in choosing what projects to take on

    Unless someone is accountable for making the right investment of resource capacity for the right projects, project intake discipline cannot be established effectively.

    What is fiduciary duty?

    Officers and directors owe their corporation the duty of acting in the corporation’s best interests over their own. They may delegate the responsibility of implementing the actions, but accountability can't be delegated; that is, they have the authority to make choices and are ultimately answerable for them.

    No question is more important to the organization’s bottom line. Projects directly impact the bottom line because they require investment of resource time and money for the purposes of realizing benefits. The scarcity of resources requires that choices be made by those who have the right authority.

    Who approves your projects?

    Historically, the answer would have been the executive layer of the organization. However, in the 1990s management largely abdicated its obligation to control resources and expenditures via “employee empowerment.”

    Controls on approvals became less rigid, and accountability for choosing what to do (and not do) shifted onto the shoulders of the individual worker. This creates a current paradigm where no one is accountable for the malinvestment…

    …of resources that comes from approving too many projects. Instead, it’s up to individual workers to sink or swim as they attempt to reconcile, day after day, seemingly infinite organizational demand with their finite supply of working hours.

    Ad hoc project selection schemes do not work

    Without active management, reconciling the imbalance between demand with available work hours is a struggle that results largely in one of these two scenarios:

    “Squeaky wheel”: Projects with the most vocal stakeholders behind them are worked on first.

    • IT is seen to favor certain lines of business, leading to disenfranchisement of other stakeholders.
    • Everything becomes the highest priority, which reinforces IT’s image as a firefighter, rather than a business value contributor
    • High-value projects without vocal support never get resourced; opportunities are missed.

    “First in, first out”: Projects are approved and executed in the order they are requested.

    • Urgent or important projects for the business languish in the project backlog; opportunities are missed.
    • Low-value projects dominate the project portfolio.
    • Stakeholders leave IT out of the loop and resort to “underground economy” for getting their needs addressed.

    80% of organizations feel that their portfolios are dominated by low-value initiatives that do not deliver value to the business (Source: Cooper).

    Approve the right projects that you have capacity to deliver by actively managing the intake of projects

    Project intake, approval, and prioritization (collectively “project intake”) reconciles the appetite for new projects with available resource capacity and strategic goals.

    Project intake is a key process of project portfolio management (PPM). The Project Management Institute (PMI) describes PPM as:

    "Interrelated organizational processes by which an organization evaluates, selects, prioritizes, and allocates its limited internal resources to best accomplish organizational strategies consistent with its vision, mission, and values."

    (PMI, Standard for Portfolio Management, 3rd ed.)

    Triple Constraint Model of the Project Portfolio

    Project Intake:

    • Stakeholder Need
    • Strategic Objectives
    • Resource Capacity

    All three components are required for the Project Portfolio

    Organizations practicing PPM recognize available resource capacity as a constraint and aim to select projects – and commit the said capacity – to projects that:

    1. Best satisfy the stakeholder needs that constantly change with the market
    2. Best align to the strategic objectives and contribute the most to business
    3. Have sufficient resource capacity available to best ensure consistent project throughput

    92% vs. 74%: 92% of high-performing organizations in PPM report that projects are well aligned to strategic initiatives vs. 74% of low performers (PMI, 2015).

    82% vs. 55%: 82% of high-performing organizations in PPM report that resources are effectively reallocated across projects vs. 55% of low performers (PMI, 2015)

    Info-Tech’s data demonstrates that optimizing project intake can also improve business leaders’ satisfaction of IT

    CEOs today perceive IT to be poorly aligned to business’ strategic goals:

    43% of CEOs believe that business goals are going unsupported by IT (Source: Info-Tech’s CEO-CIO Alignment Survey (N=124)).

    60% of CEOs believe that improvement is required around IT’s understanding of business goals (Source: Info-Tech’s CEO-CIO Alignment Survey (N=124)).

    Business leaders today are generally dissatisfied with IT:

    30% of business stakeholders are supporters of their IT departments (Source: Info-Tech’s CIO Business Vision Survey (N=21,367)).

    The key to improving business satisfaction with IT is to deliver on projects that help the business achieve its strategic goals:

    A chart is depicted to show a list of reported important projects, and then reordering the projects based on actual importance.
    Source: Info-Tech’s CIO Business Vision Survey (N=21,367)

    Optimized project intake not only improves the project portfolio’s alignment to business goals, but provides the most effective way to improve relationships with IT’s key stakeholders.

    Benchmark your own current state with overall & industry-specific data using Info-Tech’s Diagnostic Program.

    However, establishing organizational discipline for project intake, approval, and prioritization is difficult

    Capacity awareness

    Many IT departments struggle to realistically estimate available project capacity in a credible way. Stakeholders question the validity of your endeavor to install capacity-constrained intake process, and mistake it for unwillingness to cooperate instead.

    Many moving parts

    Project intake, approval, and prioritization involve the coordination of various departments. Therefore, they require a great deal of buy-in and compliance from multiple stakeholders and senior executives.

    Lack of authority

    Many PMOs and IT departments simply lack the ability to decline or defer new projects.

    Unclear definition of value

    Defining the project value is difficult because there are so many different and conflicting ways that are all valid in their own right. However, without it, it's impossible to fairly compare among projects to select what's "best."

    Establishing intake discipline requires a great degree of cooperation and conformity among stakeholders that can be cultivated through strong processes.

    Info-Tech’s intake, approval, and prioritization methodology systemically fits the project portfolio to its triple constraint

    Info-Tech’s Methodology

    Info-Tech’s Methodology
    Project Intake Project Approval Project Prioritization
    Project requests are submitted, received, triaged, and scoped in preparation for approval and prioritization. Business cases are developed, evaluated, and selected (or declined) for investment, based on estimated value and feasibility. Work is scheduled to begin, based on relative value, urgency, and availability of resources.
    Stakeholder Needs Strategic Objectives Resource Capacity
    Project Portfolio Triple Constraint

    Info-Tech’s methodology for optimizing project intake delivers extraordinary value, fast

    In the first step of the blueprint, you will prototype a set of scorecard criteria for determining project value.

    Our methodology is designed to tackle your hardest challenge first to deliver the highest-value part of the deliverable. Since the overarching goal of optimizing project intake, approval, and prioritization process is to maximize the throughput of the best projects, one must define how “the best projects” are determined.

    In nearly all instances…a key challenge for the PPM team is reaching agreement over how projects should rank.

    – Merkhofer

    A Project Value Scorecard will help you:

    • Evolve the discussions on project and portfolio value beyond a theoretical concept
    • Enable apples-to-apples comparisons amongst many different kinds of projects

    The Project Value Scorecard Development Tool is designed to help you develop the project valuation scheme iteratively. Download the pre-filled tool with content that represents a common case, and then, customize it with your data.

    A screenshot of Info-Tech's Project Value Scorecard Development Tool

    This blueprint provides a clear path to maximizing your chance of success in optimizing project intake

    Info-Tech’s practical, tactical research is accompanied by a suite of tools and templates to accelerate your process optimization efforts.

    Organizational change and stakeholder management are critical elements of optimizing project intake, approval, and prioritization processes because they require a great degree of cooperation and conformity among stakeholders, and the list of key stakeholders are long and far-reaching.

    This blueprint will provide a clear path to not only optimize the processes themselves, but also for the optimization effort itself. This research is organized into three phases, each requiring a few weeks of work at your team’s own pace – or all in one week, through a workshop facilitated by Info-Tech analysts.

    Set Realistic Goals for Optimizing Project Intake, Approval, and Prioritization

    Tools and Templates:

    • Project Value Scorecard Development Tool (.xlsx)
    • PPM Assessment Report (Info-Tech Diagnostics)
    • Standard Operating Procedure Template (.docx)

    Build Optimized Project Intake, Approval, and Prioritization Processes

    Tools and Templates:

    • Project Request Forms (.docx)
    • Project Classification Matrix (.xlsx)
    • Benefits Commitment Form (.xlsx)
    • Proposed Project Technology Assessment Tool (.xlsx)
    • Business Case Templates (.docx)
    • Intake and Prioritization Tool (.xlsx)

    Integrate the Newly Optimized Processes into Practice

    Tools and Templates:

    • Process Pilot Plan Template (.docx)
    • Impact Assessment and Communication Planning Tool (.xlsx)

    Info-Tech’s approach to PPM is informed by industry best practices and rooted in practical insider research

    Info-Tech uses PMI and ISACA frameworks for areas of this research.

    The logo for PMI is in the picture.

    PMI’s Standard for Portfolio Management, 3rd ed. is the leading industry framework, proving project portfolio management best practices and process guidelines.

    The logo for COBIT 5 is in the picture.

    COBIT 5 is the leading framework for the governance and management of enterprise IT.

    In addition to industry-leading frameworks, our best-practice approach is enhanced by the insights and guidance from our analysts, industry experts, and our clients.

    Info-Tech's logo is shown.

    33,000+

    Our peer network of over 33,000 happy clients proves the effectiveness of our research.

    1,000+

    Our team conducts 1,000+ hours of primary and secondary research to ensure that our approach is enhanced by best practices.

    Deliver measurable project intake success for your organization with this blueprint

    Measure the value of your effort to track your success quantitatively and demonstrate the proposed benefits, as you aim to do so with other projects through improved PPM.

    Optimized project intake, approval, and prioritization processes lead to a high PPM maturity, which will improve the successful delivery and throughput of your projects, resource utilization, business alignment, and stakeholder satisfaction ((Source: BCG/PMI).

    A double bar graph is depicted to show high PPM maturity yields measurable benefits. It covers 4 categories: Management for individual projects, financial performance, strategy implementation, and organizational agility.

    Measure your success through the following metrics:

    • Reduced turnaround time between project requests and initial scoping
    • Number of project proposals with articulated benefits
    • Reduction in “off-the-grid” projects
    • Team satisfaction and workplace engagement
    • PPM stakeholder satisfaction score from business stakeholders: see Info-Tech’s PPM Customer Satisfaction Diagnostics

    $44,700: In the past 12 months, Info-Tech clients have reported an average measured value of $44,700 from undertaking a guided implementation of this research.

    Add your own organization-specific goals, success criteria, and metrics by following the steps in the blueprint.

    Case Study: Financial Services PMO prepares annual planning process with Project Value Scorecard Development Tool

    CASE STUDY

    Industry: Financial Services

    Source: Info-Tech Client

    Challenge

    PMO plays a diverse set of roles, including project management for enterprise projects (i.e. PMI’s “Directive” PMO), standards management for department-level projects (i.e. PMI’s “Supportive” PMO), process governance of strategic projects (i.e. PMI’s “Controlling” PMO), and facilitation / planning / reporting for the corporate business strategy efforts (i.e. Enterprise PMO).

    To facilitate the annual planning process, the PMO needed to develop a more data-driven and objective project intake process that implicitly aligned with the corporate strategy.

    Solution

    Info-Tech’s Project Value Scorecard tool was incorporated into the strategic planning process.

    Results

    The scorecard provided a simple way to list the competing strategic initiatives, objectively score them, and re-sort the results on demand as the leadership chooses to switch between ranking by overall score, project value, ability to execute, strategic alignment, operational alignment, and feasibility.

    The Project Value Scorecard provided early value with multiple options for prioritized rankings.

    A screenshot of the Project Value Scorecard is shown in the image.

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    “Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful.”

    Guided Implementation

    “Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track.”

    Workshop

    “We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place.”

    Consulting

    “Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project.”

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

    Optimize Project Intake, Approval, and Prioritization – project overview

    1. Set Realistic Goals for Optimizing Process 2. Build New Optimized Processes 3. Integrate the New Processes into Practice
    Best-Practice Toolkit

    1.1 Define the criteria with which to determine project value.


    2.1 Streamline intake to manage stakeholder expectations.

    2.2 Set up steps of project approval to maximize strategic alignment while right-sizing the required effort.

    2.3 Prioritize projects to maximize the value of the project portfolio within the constraint of resource capacity.

    3.1 Pilot your intake, approval, and prioritization process to refine it before rollout.

    3.2 Analyze the impact of organizational change through the eyes of PPM stakeholders to gain their buy-in.

    Guided Implementations
    • Introduce Project Value Scorecard Development Tool and pilot Info-Tech’s example scorecard on your own backlog.
    • Map current project intake, approval, and prioritization process and key stakeholders.
    • Set realistic goals for process optimization.
    • Improve the management of stakeholder expectations with an optimized intake process.
    • Improve the alignment of the project portfolio to strategic objectives with an optimized approval process.
    • Enable resource capacity-constrained greenlighting of projects with an optimized prioritization process.
    • Create a process pilot strategy with supportive stakeholders.
    • Conduct a change impact analysis for your PPM stakeholders to create an effective communication strategy.
    • Roll out the new process and measure success.
    Onsite Workshop

    Module 1:

    Refocus on Project Value to Set Realistic Goals for Optimizing Project Intake, Approval, and Prioritization Process

    Module 2:

    Examine, Optimize, and Document the New Project Intake, Approval, and Prioritization Process

    Module 3:

    Pilot, Plan, and Communicate the New Process and Its Required Organizational Changes

    Phase 1 Outcome:
    • Draft project valuation criteria
    • Examination of current process
    • Definition of process success criteria
    Phase 2 Outcome:
    • Documentation of new project intake, approval, and prioritization process
    • Tools and templates to aid the process
    Phase 3 Outcome:
    • Process pilot plan
    • Organizational change communication plan

    Workshop overview

    Contact your account representative or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Workshop Day 1 Workshop Day 2 Workshop Day 3 Workshop Day 4 Workshop Day 5
    Activities

    Benefits of optimizing project intake and project value definition

    1.1 Complete and review PPM Current State Scorecard Assessment

    1.2 Define project value for the organization

    1.3 Engage key PPM stakeholders to iterate on the scorecard prototype

    Set realistic goals for process optimization

    2.1 Map current intake, approval, and prioritization workflow

    2.2 Enumerate and prioritize process stakeholders

    2.3 Determine the current and target capability levels

    2.4 Define the process success criteria and KPIs

    Optimize project intake and approval processes

    3.1 Conduct focused retrospectives for project intake and approval

    3.2 Define project levels

    3.3 Optimize project intake processes

    3.4 Optimize project approval processes

    3.5 Compose SOP for intake and approval

    3.6 Document the new intake and approval workflow

    Optimize project prioritization process plan for a process pilot

    4.1 Conduct focused retrospective for project prioritization

    4.2 Estimate available resource capacity

    4.3 Pilot Project Intake and Prioritization Tool with your project backlog

    4.4 Compose SOP for prioritization

    4.5 Document the new prioritization workflow

    4.6 Discuss process pilot

    Analyze stakeholder impact and create communication strategy

    5.1 Analyze stakeholder impact and responses to impending organization change

    5.2 Create message canvas for at-risk change impacts and stakeholders

    5.3 Set course of action for communicating change

    Deliverables
    1. PPM Current State Scorecard
    2. Project Value Scorecard prototype
    1. Current intake, approval, and prioritization workflow
    2. Stakeholder register
    3. Intake process success criteria
    1. Project request form
    2. Project level classification matrix
    3. Proposed project deliverables toolkit
    4. Customized intake and approval SOP
    5. Flowchart for the new intake and approval workflow
    1. Estimated resource capacity for projects
    2. Customized Project Intake and Prioritization Tool
    3. Customized prioritization SOP
    4. Flowchart for the new prioritization workflow
    5. Process pilot plan
    1. Completed Intake and Prioritization Impact Analysis Tool
    2. Communication strategy and plan

    Phase 1

    Set Realistic Goals for Optimizing Project Intake, Approval, and Prioritization Process

    Phase 1 outline

    Call 1-888-670-8889 or email GuidedImplementations@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Complete these steps on your own, or call us to complete a guided implementation. A guided implementation is a series of 2-3 advisory calls that help you execute each phase of a project. They are included in most advisory memberships.

    Guided Implementation 1: Set Realistic Goals for Project Intake, Approval, and Prioritization Process Proposed Time to Completion: 1-2 weeks

    Step 1.1: Define the project valuation criteria

    Start with an analyst kick-off call:

    • Discuss how a project value is currently determined
    • Introduce Info-Tech’s scorecard-driven project valuation approach

    Then complete these activities…

    • Create a first-draft version of a project value-driven prioritized list of projects
    • Review and iterate on the scorecard criteria

    With these tools & templates:

    Project Value Scorecard Development Tool

    Step 1.2: Envision your process target state

    Start with an analyst kick-off call:

    • Introduce Info-Tech’s project intake process maturity model
    • Discuss the use of Info-Tech’s Diagnostic Program for an initial assessment of your current PPM processes

    Then complete these activities…

    • Map your current process workflow
    • Enumerate and prioritize your key stakeholders
    • Define process success criteria

    With these tools & templates:

    Project Intake Workflow Template

    Project Intake, Approval, and Prioritization SOP Template

    Phase 1 Results & Insights:
    • The overarching goal of optimizing project intake, approval, and prioritization process is to maximize the throughput of the best projects. To achieve this goal, one must have a clear way to determine what are “the best” projects.

    Get to value early with Step 1.1 of this blueprint

    Define how to determine a project’s value and set the stage for maximizing the value of your project portfolio using Info-Tech’s Project Value Scorecard Development Tool.

    Where traditional models of consulting can take considerable amounts of time before delivering value to clients, Info-Tech’s methodology for optimizing project intake, approval, and prioritization process gets you to value fast.

    The overarching goal of optimizing project intake, approval, and prioritization process is to maximize the throughput of the best projects. To achieve this goal, one must have a clear way to determine what are “the best” projects.

    In the first step of this blueprint, you will pilot a multiple-criteria scorecard for determining project value that will help answer that question. Info-Tech’s Project Value Scorecard Development Tool is pre-populated with a ready-to-use, real-life example that you can leverage as a starting point for tailoring it to your organization – or adopt as is.

    Introduce objectivity and clarity to your discussion of maximizing the value of your project portfolio with Info-Tech’s practical IT research that drives measurable results.

    Download Info-Tech’s Project Value Scorecard Development Tool.

    A screenshot of Info-Tech's Project Value Scorecard Development Tool

    Step 1.1: Define the criteria with which to determine project value

    PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3

    1.1

    Define project valuation criteria

    1.2

    Envision process target state

    2.1

    Streamline intake

    2.2

    Right-size approval steps

    2.3

    Prioritize projects to fit resource capacity

    3.1

    Pilot your optimized process

    3.2

    Communicate organizational change

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Learn how to use the Project Value Scorecard Development Tool
    • Create a first-draft version of a project value-driven prioritized list of projects

    This step involves the following participants:

    • PMO Director/ Portfolio Manager
    • Project Managers
    • Business Analysts
    • CIO (optional)

    Outcomes of this step

    • Understand the importance of devising a consensus criteria for project valuation.
    • Try a project value scorecard-driven prioritization process with your currently proposed.
    • Set the stage for optimizing project intake, approval, and prioritization processes.

    Intake, Approval, and Prioritization is a core process in Info-Tech’s project portfolio management (PPM) framework

    PPM is an infrastructure around projects that aims to ensure that the best projects are worked on at the right time with the right people.

    PPM’s goal is to maximize the throughput of projects that provide strategic and operational value to the organization. To do this, a PPM strategy must help to:

    Info-Tech's Project Portfolio Management Process Model
    3. Status & Progress Reporting
    1. Intake, Approval & Prioritization 2. Resource Management 3. Project Management 4. Project Closure 5. Benefits Tracking
    Intake Execution Closure
    1. Select the best projects
    2. Pick the right time and people to execute the projects
    3. Make sure the projects are okay
    4. Make sure the projects get done
    5. Make sure they were worth doing

    If you don’t yet have a PPM strategy in place, or would like to revisit your existing PPM strategy before optimizing your project intake, approval, and prioritization practices, see Info-Tech’s blueprint, Develop a Project Portfolio Management Strategy.

    A screenshot of Info-Tech's blueprint Develop a Project Portfolio Management Strategy is shown.

    “Too many projects, not enough resources” is the reality of most IT environments

    A profound imbalance between demand (i.e. approved project work and service delivery commitments) and supply (i.e. people’s time) is the top challenge IT departments face today.

    In today’s organizations, the desires of business units for new products and enhancements, and the appetites of senior leadership to approve more and more projects for those products and services, far outstrip IT’s ability to realistically deliver on everything.

    The vast majority of IT departments lack the resourcing to meet project demand – especially given the fact that day-to-day operational demands frequently trump project work.

    As a result, project throughput suffers – and with it, IT’s reputation within the organization.

    An image is depicted that has several projects laid out near a scale filling one side of it and off of it. On the other part of the scale which is higher, has an image of people in it to help show the relationship between resource supply and project demand.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Where does the time go? The portfolio manager (or equivalent) should function as the accounting department for time, showing what’s available in IT’s human resources budget for projects and providing ongoing visibility into how that budget of time is being spent.

    Don’t weigh your portfolio down by starting more than you can finish

    Focus on what will deliver value to the organization and what you can realistically deliver.

    Most of the problems that arise during the lifecycle of a project can be traced back to issues that could have been mitigated during the initiation phase.

    More than simply a means of early problem detection at the project level, optimizing your initiation processes is also the best way to ensure the success of your portfolio. With optimized intake processes you can better guarantee:

    • The projects you are working on are of high value
    • Your project list aligns with available resource capacity
    • Stakeholder needs are addressed, but stakeholders do not determine the direction of the portfolio

    80% of organizations feel their portfolios are dominated by low-value initiatives that do not deliver value to the business (Source: Cooper).

    "(S)uccessful organizations select projects on the basis of desirability and their capability to deliver them, not just desirability" (Source: John Ward, Delivering Value from Information Systems and Technology Investments).

    Establishing project value is the first – and difficult – step for optimizing project intake, approval, and prioritization

    What is the best way to “deliver value to the organization”?

    Every organization needs to explicitly define how to determine project value that will fairly represent all projects and provide a basis of comparison among them during approval and prioritization. Without it, any discussions on reducing “low-value initiatives” from the previous slide cannot yield any actionable plan.

    However, defining the project value is difficult, because there are so many different and conflicting ways that are all valid in their own right and worth considering. For example:

    • Strategic growth vs. operational stability
    • Important work vs. urgent work
    • Return on investment vs. cost containment
    • Needs of a specific line of business vs. business-wide needs
    • Financial vs. intangible benefits

    This challenge is further complicated by the difficulty of identifying the right criteria for determining project value:

    Managers fail to identify around 50% of the important criteria when making decisions (Source: Transparent Choice).

    Info-Tech Insight

    Sometimes it can be challenging to show the value of IT-centric, operational-type projects that maintain critical infrastructure since they don’t yield net-new benefits. Remember that benefits are only half the equation; you must also consider the costs of not undertaking the said project.

    Find the right mix of criteria for project valuation with Info-Tech’s Project Value Scorecard Development Tool

    Scorecard-driven approach is an easy-to-understand, time-tested solution to a multiple-criteria decision-making problem, such as project valuation.

    This approach is effective for capturing benefits and costs that are not directly quantifiable in financial terms. Projects are evaluated on multiple specific questions, or criteria, that each yield a score on a point scale. The overall score is calculated as a weighted sum of the scores.

    Info-Tech’s Project Value Scorecard is pre-populated with a best-practice example of eight criteria, two for each category (see box at bottom right). This example helps your effort to develop your own project scorecard by providing a solid starting point:

    60%: On their own, decision makers could only identify around 6 of their 10 most important criteria for making decisions (Source: Transparent Choice).

    Finally, in addition, the overall scores of approved projects can be used as a metric on which success of the process can be measured over time.

    Download Info-Tech’s Project Value Scorecard Development Tool.

    A screenshot of Info-Tech's Project Value Scorecard Development Tool

    Categories of project valuation criteria

    • Strategic alignment: projects must be aligned with the strategic goals of the business and IT.
    • Operational alignment: projects must be aligned with the operational goals of the business and IT.
    • Feasibility: practical considerations for projects must be taken into account in selecting projects.
    • Financial: projects must realize monetary benefits, in increased revenue or decreased costs, while posing as little risk of cost overrun as possible.

    Review the example criteria and score description in the Project Value Scorecard Development Tool

    1.1.1 Project Value Scorecard Development Tool, Tab 2: Evaluation Criteria

    This tab lists eight criteria that cover strategic alignment, operational alignment, feasibility, and financial benefits/risks. Each criteria is accompanied by a qualitative score description to standardize the analysis across all projects and analysts. While this tool supports up to 15 different criteria, it’s better to minimize the number of criteria and introduce additional ones as the organization grows in PPM maturity.

    A screenshot of Info-Tech's Project Value Scorecard Development Tool, Tab 2: Evaluation Criteria

    Type: It is useful to break down projects with similar overall scores by their proposed values versus ease of execution.

    Scale: Five-point scale is not required for this tool. Use more or less granularity of description as appropriate for each criteria.

    Blank Criteria: Rows with blank criteria are greyed out. Enter a new criteria to turn on the row.

    Score projects and search for the right mix of criteria weighting using the scorecard tab

    1.1.1 Project Value Scorecard Development Tool, Tab 3: Project Scorecard

    In this tab, you can see how projects are prioritized when they are scored according to the criteria from the previous tab. You can enter the scores of up to 30 projects in the scorecard table (see screenshot to the right).

    A screenshot of Info-Tech's Project Value Scorecard Development Tool, Tab 3: Project Scorecard is shown.

    Value (V) or Execution (E) & Relative Weight: Change the relative weights of each criteria and review any changes to the prioritized list of projects change, whose rankings are updated automatically. This helps you iterate on the weights to find the right mix.

    Feasibility: Custom criteria category labels will be automatically updated.

    A screenshot of Info-Tech's Project Value Scorecard Development Tool, Tab 3: Project Scorecard is shown.

    Overall: Choose the groupings of criteria by which you want to see the prioritized list. Available groupings are:

    • Overall score
    • By value or by execution
    • By category

    Ranks and weighted scores for each project is shown.

    For example, click on the drop-down and choose “Execution.”

    A screenshot of Info-Tech's Project Value Scorecard Development Tool, Tab 3: Project Scorecard is shown.

    Project ranks are based only on execution criteria.

    Create a first-draft version of a project value-driven prioritized list of projects

    1.1.1 Estimated Time: 60 minutes

    Follow the steps below to test Info-Tech’s example Project Value Scorecard and examine the prioritized list of projects.

    1. Using your list of proposed, ongoing, and completed projects, identify a representative sample of projects in your project portfolio, varying in size, scope, and perceived value – about 10-20 of them.
    2. Arrange these projects in the order of priority using any processes or prioritization paradigm currently in place in your organization.
    • In the absence of formal process, use your intuition, as well as knowledge of organizational priorities, and your stakeholders.
  • Use the example criteria and score description in Tab 2 of Info-Tech’s Project Value Scorecard Development Tool to score the same list of projects:
    • Avoid spending too much time at this step. Prioritization criteria will be refined in the subsequent parts of the blueprint.
    • If multiple scorers are involved, allow some overlap to benchmark for consistency.
  • Enter the scores in Tab 3 of the tool to obtain the first-draft version of a project value-driven prioritized project list. Compare it with your list from Step 2.
  • INPUT

    • Knowledge of proposed, ongoing, and completed projects in your project portfolio

    OUTPUT

    • Prioritized project lists

    Materials

    • Project Value Scorecard Development Tool

    Participants

    • PMO Director/ Portfolio Manager
    • Project Managers
    • Business Analysts
    • CIO (optional)

    Iterate on the scorecard to set the stage for optimizing project intake, approval, and prioritization

    1.1.2 Estimated Time: 60 minutes

    Conduct a retrospective of the previous activity by asking these questions:

    • How smooth was the overall scoring experience (Step 3 of Activity 1.1.1)?
    • Did you experience challenges in interpreting and applying the example project valuation criteria? Why? (e.g. lack of information, absence of formalized business strategic goals, too much room for interpretation in scoring description)
    • Did the prioritized project list agree with your intuition?

    Iterate on the project valuation criteria:

    • Manipulate the relatives weights of valuation criteria to fine-tune them.
    • Revise the scoring descriptions to provide clarity or customize them to better fit your organization’s needs, then update the project scores accordingly.
    • For projects that did not score well, will this cause concern from any stakeholders? Are the concerns legitimate? If so, this may indicate the need for inclusion of new criteria.
    • For projects that score too well, this may indicate a bias toward a specific type of project or group of stakeholders. Try adjusting the relative weights of existing criteria.

    INPUT

    • Activity 1.1.1

    OUTPUT

    • Retrospective on project valuation
    • Review of project valuation criteria

    Materials

    • Project Value Scorecard Development Tool

    Participants

    • PMO Director/ Portfolio Manager
    • Project Managers
    • Business Analysts
    • CIO (optional)

    Next steps: engage key PPM stakeholders to reach a consensus when establishing how to determine project value

    Engage these key players to create the evaluation criteria that all stakeholders will support:

    • Business units: Projects are undertaken to provide value to the business. Senior management from business units must help define how project will be valued.
    • IT: IT must ensure that technical/practical considerations are taken into account when determining project value.
    • Finance: The CFO or designated representative will ensure that estimated project costs and benefits can be used to manage the budget.
    • PMO: PMO is the administrator of the project portfolio. PMO must provide coordination and support to ensure the process operates smoothly and its goals are realized.
    • Business analysts: BAs carry out the evaluation of project value. Therefore, their understanding of the evaluation criteria and the process as a whole are critical to the success of the process.
    • Project sponsors: Project sponsors are accountable for the realization of benefits for which projects are undertaken.

    Optimize the process with the new project value definition to focus your discussion with stakeholders

    This blueprint will help you not only optimize the process, but also help you work with your stakeholders to realize the benefits of the optimized process.

    In this step, you’ve begun improving the definition of project value. Getting it right will require several more iterations and will require a series of discussions with your key stakeholders.

    The optimized intake process built around the new definition of project value will help evolve a conceptual discussion about project value into a more practical one. The new process will paint a picture of what the future state will look like for your stakeholders’ requested projects getting approved and prioritized for execution, so that they can provide feedback that’s concrete and actionable. To help you with that process, you will be taken through a series of activities to analyze the impact of change on your stakeholders and create a communication plan in the last phase of the blueprint.

    For now, in the next step of this blueprint, you will undergo a series of activities to assess your current state to identify the specific areas for process optimization.

    "To find the right intersection of someone’s personal interest with the company’s interest on projects isn’t always easy. I always try to look for the basic premise that you can get everybody to agree on it and build from there… But it’s sometimes hard to make sure that things stick. You may have to go back three or four times to the core agreement."

    -Eric Newcomer

    Step 1.2: Envision your target state for your optimized project intake, approval, and prioritization process

    PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3

    1.1

    Define project valuation criteria

    1.2

    Envision process target state

    2.1

    Streamline intake

    2.2

    Right-size approval steps

    2.3

    Prioritize projects to fit resource capacity

    3.1

    Pilot your optimized process

    3.2

    Communicate organizational change

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Map your current project intake, approval, and prioritization workflow, and document it in a flowchart
    • Enumerate and prioritize your key process stakeholders
    • Determine your process capability level within Info-Tech’s Framework
    • Establish your current and target states for project intake, approval, and prioritization process

    This step involves the following participants:

    • CIO
    • PMO Director/Portfolio Manager
    • Project Managers
    • Business Analysts
    • Other PPM stakeholders

    Outcomes of this step

    • Current project intake, approval, and prioritization process is mapped out and documented in a flowchart
    • Key process stakeholders are enumerated and prioritized to inform future discussion on optimizing processes
    • Current and target organizational process capability levels are determined
    • Success criteria and key performance indicators for process optimization are defined

    Use Info-Tech’s Diagnostic Program for an initial assessment of your current PPM processes

    This step is highly recommended but not required. Call 1-888-670-8889 to inquire about or request the PPM Diagnostics.

    Info-Tech's Project Portfolio Management Assessmentprovides you with a data-driven view of the current state of your portfolio, including your intake processes. Our PPM Assessment measures and communicates success in terms of Info-Tech’s best practices for PPM.

    A screenshot of Info-Tech's Project Portfolio Management Assessment blueprint is shown.

    Use the diagnostic program to:

    • Assess resource utilization across the portfolio.
    • Determine project portfolio reporting completeness.
    • Solicit feedback from your customers on the clarity of your portfolio’s business goals.
    • Rate the overall quality of your project management practices and benchmark your rating over time.
    A screenshot of Info-Tech's Project Portfolio Management Assessment blueprint is shown.

    Scope your process optimization efforts with Info-Tech’s high-level intake, approval, and prioritization workflow

    Info-Tech recommends the following workflow at a high level for a capacity-constrained intake process that aligns to strategic goals and stakeholder need.

    • Intake (Step 2.1)*
      • Receive project requests
      • Triage project requests and assign a liaison
      • High-level scoping & set stakeholder expectations
    • Approval (Step 2.2)*
      • Concept approval by project sponsor
      • High-level technical solution approval by IT
      • Business case approval by business
      • Resource allocation & greenlight projects
    • Prioritization (Step 2.3)*
      • Update project priority scores & available project capacity
      • Identify high-scoring and “on-the-bubble” projects
      • Recommend projects to greenlight or deliberate

    * Steps denote the place in the blueprint where the steps are discussed in more detail.

    Use this workflow as a baseline to examine your current state of the process in the next slide.

    Map your current project intake, approval, and prioritization workflow

    1.2.1 Estimated Time: 60-90 minutes

    Conduct a table-top planning exercise to map out the processes currently in place for project intake, approval, and prioritization.

    1. Use white 4”x6” recipe cards / large sticky notes to write out unique steps of a process. Use the high-level process workflow from the previous slides as a guide.
    2. Arrange the steps into chronological order. Benchmark the arrangement through a group discussion.
    3. Use green cards to identify artifacts or deliverables that result from a step.
    4. Use yellow cards to identify who does the work (i.e. responsible parties), and who makes the decisions (i.e. accountable party). Keep in mind that while multiple parties may be responsible, accountability cannot be shared and only a single party can be accountable for a process.
    5. Use red cards to identify issues, problems, or risks. These are opportunities for optimization.

    INPUT

    • Documentation describing the current process (e.g. standard operating procedures)
    • Info-Tech’s high-level intake workflow

    OUTPUT

    • Current process, mapped out

    Materials

    • 4x6” recipe cards
    • Whiteboard

    Participants

    • PMO Director/ Portfolio Manager
    • Project Managers
    • Business Analysts
    • Other PPM stakeholders

    Document the current project intake, approval, and prioritization workflow in a flowchart

    1.2.2 Estimated Time: 60 minutes

    Document the results of the previous table-top exercise (Activity 1.1.1) into a flow chart. Flowcharts provide a bird’s-eye view of process steps that highlight the decision points and deliverables. In addition, swim lanes can be used to indicate process stages, task ownership, or responsibilities (example below).

    An example is shown for activity 1.2.2

    Review and customize section 1.2, “Overall Process Workflow” in Info-Tech’s Project Intake, Approval, and Prioritization SOP Template.

    "Flowcharts are more effective when you have to explain status and next steps to upper management."

    – Assistant Director-IT Operations, Healthcare Industry

    Browser-based flowchart tool examples

    INPUT

    • Mapped-out project intake process (Activity 1.2.1)

    OUTPUT

    • Flowchart representation of current project intake workflow

    Materials

    • Microsoft Visio, flowchart software, or Microsoft PowerPoint

    Participants

    • PMO Director/ Portfolio Manager
    • Project Managers
    • Business Analysts

    Example of a project intake, approval, and prioritization flow chart – without swim lanes

    An example project intake, approval, and prioritization flow chart without swim lanes is shown.

    Example of a project intake, approval, and prioritization flow chart – with swim lanes

    An example project intake, approval, and prioritization flow chart with swim lanes is shown.

    Download Info-Tech’s Project Intake Workflow Template (Visio and PDF)

    Enumerate your key stakeholders for optimizing intake, approval, and prioritization process

    1.2.3 30-45 minutes

    In the previous activity, accountable and responsible stakeholders for each of the steps in the current intake, approval, and prioritization process were identified.

    1. Based on your knowledge and insight of your organization, ensure that all key stakeholders with accountable and responsible stakeholders are accounted for in the mapped-out process. Note any omissions: it may indicate a missing step, or that the stakeholder ought to be, but are not currently, involved.
    2. For each step, identify any stakeholders that are currently consulted or informed. Then, examine the whole map and identify any other stakeholders that ought to be consulted or informed.
    3. Compile a list of stakeholders from steps 1-2, and write each of their names in two sticky notes.
    4. Put both sets of sticky notes on a wall. Use the wisdom-of-the-crowd approach to arrange one set in a descending order of influence. Record their ranked influence from 1 (least) to 10 (most).
    5. Rearrange the other set in a descending order of interest in seeing the project intake process optimized. Record their ranked interest from 1 (least) to 10 (most).

    INPUT

    • Mapped-out project intake process (Activity 1.2.1)
    • Insight on organizational culture

    OUTPUT

    • List of stakeholders in project intake
    • Ranked list in their influence and interest

    Materials

    • Sticky notes
    • Walls

    Participants

    • PMO Director/ Portfolio Manager
    • Project Managers
    • Business Analysts
    • Other PPM stakeholders

    Prioritize your stakeholders for project intake, approval, and prioritization process

    There are three dimensions for stakeholder prioritization: influence, interest, and support.

    1. Map your stakeholders in a 2D stakeholder power map (top right) according to their relative influence and interest.
    2. Rate their level of support by asking the following question: how likely is it that your stakeholder would welcome an improved process for project intake?

    These parameters will inform how to prioritize your stakeholders according to the stakeholder priority heatmap (bottom right). This priority should inform how to focus your attention during the subsequent optimization efforts.

    A flowchart is shown to show the relationship between influence and interest.

    Level of Support
    Stakeholder Category Supporter Evangelist Neutral Blocker
    Engage Critical High High Critical
    High Medium Low Low Medium
    Low High Medium Medium High
    Passive Low Irrelevant Irrelevant Low

    Info-Tech Insight

    There may be too many stakeholders to be able to achieve complete satisfaction. Focus your attention on the stakeholders that matter the most.

    Most organizations have low to medium capabilities around intake, approval, and prioritization

    1.2.4 Estimated Time: 15 minutes

    Use Info-Tech’s Intake Capability Framework to help define your current and target states for intake, approval, and prioritization.

    Capability Level Capability Level Description
    Capability Level 5: Optimized Our department has effective intake processes with right-sized administrative overhead. Work is continuously prioritized to keep up with emerging challenges and opportunities.
    Capability Level 4: Aligned Our department has very strong intake processes. Project approvals are based on business cases and aligned with future resource capacity.
    Capability Level 3: Engaged Our department has processes in place to track project requests and follow up on them. Priorities are periodically re-evaluated, based largely on the best judgment of one or several executives.
    Capability Level 2: Defined Our department has some processes in place but no capacity to say no to new projects. There is a formal backlog, but little or no method for grooming it.
    Capability Level 1: Unmanaged Our department has no formal intake processes in place. Most work is done reactively, with little ability to prioritize proactive project work.

    Refer to the subsequent slides for more detail on these capability levels.

    Level 1: Unmanaged

    Use these descriptions to place your organization at the appropriate level of intake capability.

    Intake Projects are requested through personal conversations and emails, with minimal documentation and oversight.
    Approval Projects are approved by default and rarely (if ever) declined. There is no definitive list of projects in the pipeline or backlog.
    Prioritization Most work is done reactively, with little ability to prioritize proactive project work.

    Symptoms

    • Poorly defined – or a complete absence of – PPM processes.
    • No formal approval committee.
    • No processes in place to balance proactive and reactive demands.

    Long Term

    PMOs at this level should work to have all requests funneled through a proper request form within six months. Decision rights for approval should be defined, and a scorecard should be in place within the year.

    Quick Win

    To get a handle on your backlog, start tracking all project requests using the “Project Data” tab in Info-Tech’s Project Intake and Prioritization Tool.

    Level 2: Defined

    Use these descriptions to place your organization at the appropriate level of intake capability.

    Intake Requests are formally documented in a request form before they’re assigned, elaborated, and executed as projects.
    Approval Projects are approved by default and rarely (if ever) declined. There is a formal backlog, but little or no method for grooming it.
    Prioritization There is a list of priorities but no process for updating it more than annually or quarterly.

    Symptoms

    • Organization does not have clear concept of project capacity.
    • There is a lack of discipline enforced on stakeholders.
    • Immature PPM processes in general.

    Long Term

    PMOs at this level should strive for greater visibility into the portfolio to help make the case for declining (or at least deferring) requests. Within the year, have a formal PPM strategy up and running.

    Quick Win

    Something PMOs at this level can accomplish quickly without any formal approval is to spend more time with stakeholders during the ideation phase to better define scope and requirements.

    Level 3: Engaged

    Use these descriptions to place your organization at the appropriate level of intake capability.

    Intake Processes and skills are in place to follow up on requests to clarify project scope before going forward with approval and prioritization.
    Approval Projects are occasionally declined based on exceptionally low feasibility or value.
    Prioritization Priorities are periodically re-evaluated based largely on the best judgment of one or several executives.

    Challenges

    • Senior executives’ “best judgement” is frequently fallible or influenced. Pet projects still enter the portfolio and deplete resources.
    • While approval processes “occasionally” filter out some low-value projects, many still get approved.

    Long Term

    PMOs at this level should advocate for a more formal cadence for prioritization and, within the year, establish a formal steering committee that will be responsible for prioritizing and re-prioritizing quarterly or monthly.

    Quick Win

    At the PMO level, employ Info-Tech’s Project Intake and Prioritization Tool to start re-evaluating projects in the backlog. Make this data available to senior executives when prioritization occurs.

    Level 4: Aligned

    Use these descriptions to place your organization at the appropriate level of intake capability.

    Intake Occurs through a centralized process. Processes and skills are in place for follow-up.
    Approval Project approvals are based on business cases and aligned with future resource capacity.
    Prioritization Project prioritization is visibly aligned with business goals.

    Challenges

    • The process of developing business cases can be too cumbersome, distracting resources from actual project work.
    • “Future” resource capacity predictions are unreliable. Reactive support work and other factors frequently change actual resource availability.

    Long Term

    PMOs at this level can strive for more accurate and frequent resource forecasting, establishing a more accurate picture of project vs. non-project work within the year.

    Quick Win

    PMOs at this level can start using Info-Tech’s Business Case Template (Comprehensive or Fast Track) to help simplify the business case process.

    Level 5: Optimizing

    Use these descriptions to place your organization at the appropriate level of intake capability.

    Intake Occurs through a centralized portal. Processes and skills are in place for thorough follow-up.
    Approval Project approvals are based on business cases and aligned with future resource capacity.
    Prioritization Work is continuously prioritized to keep up with emerging challenges and opportunities.

    Challenges

    • Establishing a reliable forecast for resource capacity remains a concern at this level as well.
    • Organizations at this level may experience an increasing clash between Agile practices and traditional Waterfall methodologies.

    A screenshot of Info-Tech's Manage an Agile Portfolio Blueprint

    PMOs at this level should look at Info-Tech’s Manage an Agile Portfolio for comprehensive tools and guidance on maintaining greater visibility at the portfolio level into work in progress and committed work.

    Establish your current and target states for process intake, approval, and prioritization

    1.2.5 Estimated Time: 20 minutes

    • Having reviewed the intake capability framework, you should be able to quickly identify where you currently reside in the model. Document this in the “Current State” box below.
    • Next, spend some time as a group discussing your target state. Make sure to set a realistic target as well as a realistic timeframe for meeting this target. Level 1s will not be able to become Level 5s overnight and certainly not without passing through the other levels on the way.
      • A realistic goal for a Level 1 to become a Level 2 is within six to eight months.
    Current State:
    Target State:
    Timeline for meeting target

    INPUT

    • Intake, approval, and prioritization capability framework (Activity 1.2.4)

    OUTPUT

    • Current and target state, with stated time goals

    Materials

    • Whiteboard

    Participants

    • CIO
    • PMO Director/ Portfolio Manager
    • Project Managers
    • Business Analysts

    Align your intake success with the strategic expectations of overall project portfolio management

    A successful project intake, approval, and prioritization process puts your leadership in a position to best steer the portfolio, like a conductor of an orchestra.

    To frame the discussion on deciding what intake success will look like, review Info-Tech’s PPM strategic expectations:

    • Project Throughput: Maximize throughput of the best projects.
    • Portfolio Visibility: Ensure visibility of current and pending projects.
    • Portfolio Responsiveness: Make the portfolio responsive to executive steering when new projects and changing priorities need rapid action.
    • Resource Utilization: Minimize resource waste and optimize the alignment of skills to assignments.
    • Benefits Realization: Clarify accountability for post-project benefits attainment for each project, and facilitate the process of tracking/reporting those benefits.
    A screenshot of Info-Tech's Develop a Project Portfolio Management Strategy blueprint.

    For a more detailed discussion and insight on PPM strategic expectations see Info-Tech’s blueprint, Develop a Project Portfolio Management Strategy.

    Decide what successful project intake, approval, prioritization process will look like

    1.2.6 Estimated Time: 60 minutes

    While assessing your current state, it is important to discuss and determine as a team how success will be defined.

    • During this process, it is important to consider tentative timelines for success milestones and to ask the question: what will success look like and when should it occur by?
    • Use the below table to help document success factors and timeliness. Follow the lead of our example in row 1.
    Optimization Benefit Objective Timeline Success Factor
    Facilitate project intake, prioritization, and communication with stakeholders to maximize time spent on the most valuable or critical projects. Look at pipeline as part of project intake approach and adjust priorities as required. July 1st Consistently updated portfolio data. Dashboards to show back capacity to customers. SharePoint development resources.

    Review and customize section 1.5, “Process Success Criteria” in Info-Tech’s Project Intake, Approval, and Prioritization SOP Template.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Establish realistic short-term goals. Even with optimized intake procedures, you may not be able to eliminate underground project economies immediately. Make your initial goals realistic, leaving room for those walk-up requests that may still appear via informal channels.

    Prepare to optimize project intake and capture the results in the Intake, Approval, and Prioritization SOP

    Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) is the reference document to get all PPM stakeholders on the same page with the new optimized process.

    The current state explored and documented in this step will serve as a starting point for each step of the next phase of the blueprint. The next phase will take a deeper dive into each of the three components of Info-Tech’s project intake methodology, so that they can achieve the success criteria you’ve defined in the previous activity.

    Info-Tech’s Project Intake, Approval, and Prioritization SOP Template is intended to capture the outcome of your process optimization efforts. This blueprint guides you through numerous activities designed for your core project portfolio management team to customize each section.

    To maximize the chances of success, it is important that the team makes a concerted effort to participate. Schedule a series of working sessions over the course of several weeks for your team to work through it – or get through it in one week, with onsite Info-Tech analyst-facilitated workshops.

    Download Info-Tech’s Project Intake, Approval, and Prioritization SOP.

    A screenshot of Info-Tech's Project Intake, Approval, and Prioritization SOP.

    Contact your account representative or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Case study: PMO develops mature intake and prioritization processes by slowly evolving its capability level

    CASE STUDY

    Industry: Not-for-Profit

    Source: Info-Tech Interview

    Challenge

    • A PMO for a large not-for-profit benefits provider had relatively high project management maturity, but the enterprise had low PPM maturity.
    • There were strong intake processes in place for following up on requests. For small projects, project managers would assist as liaisons to help control scope. For corporate initiates, PMs were assigned to work with a sponsor to define scope and write a charter.

    Solution

    Prioritization was a challenge. Initially, the organization had ad hoc prioritization practices, but they had developed a scoring criteria to give more formality and direction to the portfolio. However, the activity of formally prioritizing proved to be too time consuming.

    Off-the-grid projects were a common problem, with initiatives consuming resources with no portfolio oversight.

    Results

    After trying “heavy” prioritization, the PMO loosened up the process. PMO staff now go through and quickly rank projects, with two senior managers making the final decisions. They re-prioritize quarterly to have discussions around resource availability and to make sure stakeholders are in tune to what IT is doing on a daily basis. IT has a monthly meeting to go over projects consuming resources and to catch anything that has fallen between the cracks.

    "Everything isn't a number one, which is what we were dealing with initially. We went through a formal prioritization period, where we painstakingly scored everything. Now we have evolved: a couple of senior managers have stepped up to make decisions, which was a natural evolution from us being able to assign a formal ranking. Now we are able to prioritize more easily and effectively without having to painstakingly score everything."

    – PMO Director, Benefits Provider

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    A photo of an Info-Tech analyst is shown.
    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech’s historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    1.1.1-2

    A screenshot of activities 1.1.1 and 1.1.2 are shown.

    Pilot Info-Tech’s Project Value Scorecard-driven prioritization method

    Use Info-Tech’s example to prioritize your current project backlog to pilot a project value-driven prioritization, which will be used to guide the entire optimization process.

    1.2.1-3

    A screenshot of activities 1.2.1 and 1.2.3 are shown.

    Map out and document current project intake, approval, and prioritization process, and the involved key stakeholders

    A table-top planning exercise helps you visualize the current process in place and identify opportunities for optimization.

    Phase 2

    Build an Optimized Project Intake, Approval, and Prioritization Process

    Phase 2 outline

    Call 1-888-670-8889 or email GuidedImplementations@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Complete these steps on your own, or call us to complete a guided implementation. A guided implementation is a series of 2-3 advisory calls that help you execute each phase of a project. They are included in most advisory memberships.

    Guided Implementation 2: Build an Optimized Project Intake, Approval, and Prioritization Process Proposed Time to Completion: 3-6 weeks

    Step 2.1: Streamline Intake

    Start with an analyst kick-off call:

    • Challenges of project intake
    • Opportunities for improving the management of stakeholder expectations by optimizing intake

    Then complete these activities…

    • Perform a process retrospective
    • Optimize your process to receive, triage, and follow up on project requests

    With these tools & templates:

    • Project Request Form.
    • Project Intake Classification Matrix

    Step 2.2: Right-Size Approval

    Start with an analyst call:

    • Challenges of project approval
    • Opportunities for improving strategic alignment of the project portfolio by optimizing project approval

    Then complete these activities…

    • Perform a process retrospective
    • Clarify accountability at each step
    • Decide on deliverables to support decision makers at each step

    With these tools & templates:

    • Benefits Commitment Form
    • Technology Assessment Tool
    • Business Case Templates

    Step 3.3: Prioritize Realistically

    Start with an analyst call:

    • Challenges in project prioritization
  • Opportunities for installing a resource capacity-constrained intake by optimizing prioritization
  • Then complete these activities…

    • Perform a process retrospective
    • Pilot the Intake and Prioritization Tool for prioritization within estimated resource capacity

    With these tools & templates:

    • Project Intake and Prioritization Tool

    Phase 2 Results & Insights:

    • Info-Tech’s methodology systemically fits the project portfolio into its triple constraint of stakeholder needs, strategic objectives, and resource capacity, to effectively address the challenges of establishing organizational discipline for project intake.

    Step 2.1: Streamline intake to manage stakeholder expectations

    PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3

    1.1

    Define project valuation criteria

    1.2

    Envision process target state

    2.1

    Streamline intake

    2.2

    Right-size approval steps

    2.3

    Prioritize projects to fit resource capacity

    3.1

    Pilot your optimized process

    3.2

    Communicate organizational change

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Perform a deeper retrospective on current project intake process
    • Optimize your process to receive project requests
    • Revisit the definition of a project for triaging requests
    • Optimize your process to triage project requests
    • Optimize your process to follow up on project requests

    This step involves the following participants:

    • PMO Director / Portfolio Manager
    • Project Managers
    • Business Analysts
    • PMO Administrative Staff

    Outcomes of this Step

    • Retrospective of the current project intake process: to continue doing, to start doing, and to stop doing
    • A streamlined, single-funnel intake channel with the right procedural friction to receive project requests
    • A refined definition of what constitutes a project, and project levels that will determine the necessary standard of rigor with which project requests should be scoped and developed into a proposal throughout the process
    • An optimized process for triaging and following up on project requests to prepare them for the steps of project approval
    • Documentation of the optimized process in the SOP document

    Understand the risks of poor intake practices

    Too much red tape could result in your portfolio falling victim to underground economies. Too little intake formality could lead to the Wild West.

    Off-the-grid projects, i.e. projects that circumvent formal intake processes, lead to underground economies that can deplete resource capacity and hijack your portfolio.

    These underground economies are typically the result of too much intake red tape. When the request process is made too complex or cumbersome, project sponsors may unsurprisingly seek alternative means to get their projects done.

    While the most obvious line of defence against the appearance of underground economies is an easy-to-use and access request form, one must be cautious. Too little intake formality could lead to a Wild West of project intake where everyone gets their initiatives approved regardless of their business merit and feasibility.

    Benefits of optimized intake Risks of poor intake
    Alignment of portfolio with business goals Portfolio overrun by off-the-grid projects
    Resources assigned to high-value projects Resources assigned to low-value projects
    Better throughput of projects in the portfolio Ever-growing project backlog
    Strong stakeholder relations Stakeholders lose faith in value of PMO

    Info-Tech Insight

    Intake is intimately bound to stakeholder management. Finding the right balance of friction for your team is the key to successfully walking the line between asking for too much and not asking for enough. If your intake process is strong, stakeholders will no longer have any reason to circumvent formal process.

    An excess number of intake channels is the telltale sign of a low capability level for intake

    Excess intake channels are also a symptom of a portfolio in turmoil.

    If you relate to the graphic below in any way, your first priority needs to be limiting the means by which projects get requested. A single, centralized channel with review and approval done in batches is the goal. Otherwise, with IT’s limited capacity, most requests will simply get added to the backlog.

    A graphic is shown to demonstrate how one may receive project requests. The following icons are in a circle: Phone, Intranet Request Form, In person, anywhere, anytime, SharePoint Request Form, Weekly Scrum, Document, and Email.

    Info-Tech Insight

    The PMO needs to have the authority – and needs to exercise the authority – to enforce discipline on stakeholders. Organizations that solicit in verbal requests (by phone, in person, or during scrum) lack the orderliness required for PPM success. In these cases, it needs to be the mission of the PMO to demand proper documentation and accountability from stakeholders before proceeding with requests.

    "The golden rule for the project documentation is that if anything during the project life cycle is not documented, it is the same as if it does not exist or never happened…since management or clients will never remember their undocumented requests or their consent to do something."

    – Dan Epstein, “Project Initiation Process: Part Two”

    Develop an intake workflow

    Info-Tech recommends following a four-step process for managing intake.

    1. Requestor fills out form and submits the request.

    Project Request Form Templates

    2. Requests are triaged into the proper queue.

    1. Divert non-project request
    2. Quickly assess value and urgency
    3. Assign specialist to follow up on request
    4. Inform the requestor

    Project Intake Classification Matrix

    3. BA or PM prepares to develop requests into a project proposal.

    1. Follow up with requestor and SMEs to refine project scope, benefits, and risks
    2. Estimate size of project and determine the required level of detail for proposal
    3. Prepare for concept approval

    Benefits Commitment Form Template

    4. Requestor is given realistic expectations for approval process.

    Perform a start-stop-continue exercise to help determine what is working and what is not working

    2.1.1 Estimated Time: 45 minutes

    Optimizing project intake may not require a complete overhaul of your existing processes. You may only need to tweak certain templates or policies. Perhaps you started out with a strong process and simply lost resolve over time – in which case you will need to focus on establishing motivation and discipline, rather than rework your entire process.

    Perform a start-stop-continue exercise with your team to help determine what should be salvaged, what should be abandoned, and what should be introduced:

    1. On a whiteboard or equivalent, write “Start,” “Stop,” and “Continue” in three separate columns. 3. As a group, discuss the responses and come to an agreement as to which are most valid.
    2. Equip your team with sticky notes or markers and have them populate the columns with ideas and suggestions surrounding your current processes. 4. Document the responses to help structure your game plan for intake optimization.
    Start Stop Continue
    • Explicitly manage follow-up expectations with project requestor
    • Receiving informal project requests
    • Take too long in proposal development
    • Quarterly approval meetings
    • Approve resources for proposal development

    INPUT

    • Current project intake workflow (Activity 1.2.2)
    • Project intake success criteria (Activity 1.2.6)

    OUTPUT

    • Retrospective review of current intake process

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Sticky notes/markers

    Participants

    • PMO Director/ Portfolio Manager
    • Project Managers
    • Business Analysts
    • PMO Admin Staff

    Streamline project requests into a single funnel

    It is important to identify all of the ways through which projects currently get requested and initiated, especially if you have various streams of intake competing with each other for resources and a place in the portfolio. Directing multiple channels into a single, centralized funnel is step number one in optimizing intake.

    To help you identify project sources within your organization, we’ve broken project requests into three archetypes: the good, the bad, and the ugly.

    1. The Good – Proper Requests: written formal requests that come in through one appropriate channel.

    The Bad – Walk-Ups: requests that do not follow the appropriate intake channel(s), but nevertheless make an effort to get into the proper queue. The most common instance of this is a portfolio manager or CIO filling out the proper project request form on behalf of, and under direction from, a senior executive.

    The Ugly – Guerilla Tactics: initiatives that make their way into the portfolio through informal methods or that consume portfolio resources without formal approval, authority, or oversight. This typically involves a key resource getting ambushed to work on a stakeholder’s “side project” without any formal approval from, or knowledge of, the PMO.

    Funnel requests through a single portal to streamline intake

    Decide how you would funnel project requests on a single portal for submitting project requests. Determining the right portal for your organization will depend on your current infrastructure options, as well as your current and target state capability levels.

    Below are examples of a platform for your project request portal.

    Platform Template document, saved in a repository or shared drive Email-based form (Outlook forms) Intranet form (SharePoint, internal CMS) Dedicated intake solution (PPM tool, idea/innovation tool)
    Pros Can be deployed very easily Consolidates requests into a single receiver Users have one place to go from any device All-in-one solution that includes scoring and prioritization
    Cons Manual submission and intake process consumes extra effort Can pose problems in managing requests across multiple people and platforms Requires existing intranet infrastructure and some development effort Solution is costly; requires adoption across all lines of business

    Increasing intake capability and infrastructure availability

    Introduce the right amount of friction into your intake process

    The key to an effective intake process is determining the right amount of friction to include for your organization. In this context, friction comes from the level of granularity within your project request form and the demands or level of accountability your intake processes place on requestors. You will want to have more or less friction on your intake form, depending on your current intake pain points.

    If you are inundated with a high volume of requests:

    • Make your intake form more detailed to deter “half-baked” requests.
    • Have more managerial oversight into the process. Require approval for each request.

    If you want to encourage the use of a formal channel:

    • Make your intake form more concise and lightweight.
    • Have less managerial oversight into the process. Inform managers of each request rather than requiring approval.

    Download Info-Tech’s Detailed Project Request Form.

    Download Info-Tech’s Light Project Request Form.

    A screenshot of Info-Tech's Project Request Form is shown.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Optimizing a process should not automatically mean reducing friction. Blindly reducing friction could generate a tidal wave of poorly thought-out requests, which only drives up unrealistic expectations. Mitigate the risk of unrealistic stakeholder expectations by carefully managing the message: optimize friction.

    Document your process to receive project requests

    2.1.2 Estimated Time: 30-60 minutes

    Review and customize section 2.2, “Receive project requests” in Info-Tech’s Project Intake, Approval, and Prioritization SOP Template.

    The goal of optimizing this process is to consolidate multiple intake channels into a single funnel with the right amount of friction to improve visibility and manageability of incoming project requests.

    The important decisions to document for this step include:

    1. What data will be collected, and from whom? For example, Info-Tech’s Light Project Request Form Template will be used to collect project requests from everyone.
    2. How will requests be collected, and from where? For example, the template will be available as a fillable form on a SharePoint site.
    3. Who will be informed of the requests? For example, the PMO Director and the BA team will be notified with a hyperlink to the completed request form.
    4. Who will handle exceptions? For example, PMO will maintain this process and will handle any questions or issues that pertain to this part of the process.

    INPUT

    • Retrospective of current process (Activity 2.1.1)

    OUTPUT

    • Customized Project Request Form
    • Method of implementation

    Materials

    • Project Request Form Templates

    Participants

    • PMO Director/ Portfolio Manager
    • Business Analysts

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Whatever method of request collection you choose, ensure there is no doubt about how requesters can access the intake form.

    Establish a triage process to improve portfolio success

    Once a request has been submitted, it will need to be triaged. Triage begins as soon as the request is received. The end goal of the triage process is to set appropriate expectations for stakeholders and to ensure that all requests going forward for approval are valid requests.

    PPM Triage Process

    1. Divert non-project requests by validating that what is described on the request form qualifies as a “project.” Make sure requests are in the appropriate queue – for example, service desk request queue, change and release management queue, etc.
    2. Quickly assess value and urgency to determine whether the request requires fast-tracking or any other special consideration.
    3. Assign a specialist to follow up on the request. Match the request to the most suitable BA, PM, or equivalent. This person will become the Request Liaison (“RL”) for the request and will work with the requestor to define preliminary requirements.
    4. Inform the requestor that the request has been received and provide clear direction on what will happen with the request next, such as who will follow up on it and when. See the next slide for some examples of this follow-up.

    The PMO Triage Team

    • Portfolio Manager, or equivalent
    • Request Liaisons (business analysts, project managers, or equivalent)

    “Request Liaison” Role

    The BAs and PMs who follow up on requests play an especially important role in the triage process. They serve as the main point of contact to the requestor as the request evolves into a business case. In this capacity they perform a valuable stakeholder management function, helping to increase confidence and enhance trust in IT.

    To properly triage project requests, define exactly what a project is

    Bring color to the grey area that can exist in IT between those initiatives that fall somewhere in between “clearly a service ticket” and “clearly a project.”

    What constitutes a project?

    Another way of asking this question that gets more to the point for this blueprint – for what types of initiatives is project intake, approval, and prioritization rigor required?

    This is especially true in IT where, for some smaller initiatives, there can be uncertainty in many organizations during the intake and initiation phase about what should be included on the formal project list and what should go to help desk’s queue.

    As the definitions in the table below show, formal project management frameworks each have similar definitions of “a project.”

    Source Definition
    PMI A temporary endeavor undertaken to create a unique product, service, or result.” (553)
    COBIT A structured set of activities concerned with delivering a defined capability (that is necessary but not sufficient to achieve a required business outcome) to the enterprise based on an agreed‐on schedule and budget.” (74)
    PRINCE2 A temporary organization that is created for the purpose of delivering one or more business products according to an agreed business case.

    For each, a project is a temporary endeavor planned around producing a specific organizational/business outcome. The challenge of those small initiatives in IT is knowing when those endeavors require a business case, formal resource tracking, and project management rigor, and when they don’t.

    Separating small projects from non-projects requires a consideration of approval rights

    While conventional wisdom says to base your project definition on an estimation of cost, risk, etc., you also need to ask, “does this initiative require formal approval?”

    In the next step, we will define a suggested minimum threshold for a small “level 1” project. While these level thresholds are good and necessary for a number of reasons – including triaging your project requests – you may still often need to exercise some critical judgment in separating the tickets from the projects. In addition to the level criteria that we will develop in this step, use the checklist below to help with your differentiating.

    Service Desk Ticket Small Project
    • Approval seems implicit given the scope of the task.
    • No expectations of needing to report on status.
    • No indications that management will require visibility during execution.
    • The scope of the task suggests formal approval may be required.
    • You may have to report on status.
    • Possibility that management may require visibility during execution.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Guard the value of the portfolio. Because tickets carry with them an implicit approval, you need to be wary at the portfolio level of those that might possess a larger scope than their status of ticket implies. Sponsors that, for whatever reason, resist the formal intake process may use the ticketing process to sneak projects in through the backdoor. When assessing tickets and small projects at the portfolio level, you need to ask: is it possible that someone at an executive level might want to get updates on this because of its duration, scope, risk, cost, etc.? Could someone at the management level get upset that the initiative came in as a ticket and is burning up time and driving costs without any visibility?

    Sample Project/Non-Project Separation Criteria

    Non-Project Small Project
    e.g. Time required e.g. < 40 hours e.g. 40 > hours
    e.g. Complexity e.g. Very low e.g. Moderate – Low Difficulty: Does not require highly developed or specialized skill sets
    e.g. Collaboration e.g. None required e.g. Limited coordination and collaboration between resources and departments
    e.g. Repeatability of work e.g. Fully repeatable e.g. Less predictable
    e.g. Frequency of request type e.g. Hourly to daily e.g. Weekly to monthly

    "If you worked for the help desk, over time you would begin to master your job since there is a certain rhythm and pattern to the work…On the other hand, projects are unique. This characteristic makes them hard to estimate and hard to manage. Even if the project is similar to one you have done before, new events and circumstances will occur. Each project typically holds its own challenges and opportunities"

    – Jeffrey and Thomas Mochal

    Define the minimum-threshold criteria for small projects

    2.1.3 Estimated Time: 30 minutes

    Follow the steps below to define the specifics of a “level 1” project for your organization.

    1. Using your project list and/or ticketing system, identify a handful of small projects, large service desk tickets, and especially those items that fall somewhere in the grey area in between (anywhere between 10 to 20 of each). Then, determine the organizationally appropriate considerations for defining your project levels. Options include:
    • Duration
    • Budget/Cost
    • Technology requirements
    • Customer involvement
    • Integration
    • Organizational impact
    • Complexity
    • Number of cross-functional workgroups and teams involved
  • Using the list of projects established in the previous step, determine the organizationally appropriate considerations for defining your project levels –anywhere from four to six considerations is a good number.
  • Using these criteria and your list of small projects, define the minimum threshold for your level one projects across each of these categories. Record these thresholds in the table on the next slide.
  • INPUT

    • Data concerning small projects and service desk tickets, including size, duration, etc.

    OUTPUT

    • Clarity around how to define your level 1 projects

    Materials

    • Whiteboard

    Participants

    • PMO Director/ Portfolio Manager
    • Project Managers
    • Business Analysts

    Remove room for stakeholder doubt and confusion by informing requests forward in a timely manner

    During triaging, requestors should be notified as quickly as possible (a) that their request has been received and (b) what to expect next for the request. Make this forum as productive and informative as possible, providing clear direction and structure for the future of the request. Be sure to include the following:

    • A request ID or ticket number.
    • Some direction on who will be following up on the request –provide an individual’s name when possible.
    • An estimated timeframe of when they can expect to hear from the individual following up.

    The logistic of this follow-up will depend on a number of different factors.

    • The number of requests you receive.
    • Your ability to automate the responses.
    • The amount of detail you would like to, or need to, provide stakeholders with.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Assign an official request number or project ID to all requests during this initial response. An official request number anchors the request to a specific and traceable dataset that will accompany the project throughout its lifecycle.

    Sample “request received” emails

    If you receive a high volume of requests or need a quick win for improving stakeholder relations:

    Sample #1: Less detailed, automatic response

    Hello Emma,

    Thank you. Your project request has been received. Requests are reviewed and assigned every Monday. A business analyst will follow up with you in the next 5-10 business days. Should you have any questions in the meantime, please reply to this email.

    Best regards,

    Information Technology Services

    If stakeholder management is a priority, and you want to emphasize the customer-facing focus:

    Sample #2: More detailed, tailored response

    Hi Darren,

    Your project request has been received and reviewed. Your project ID number is #556. Business analyst Alpertti Attar has been assigned to follow up on your request. You can expect to hear from him in the next 5-10 business days to set up a meeting for preliminary requirements gathering.

    If you have any questions in the meantime, please contact Alpertti at aattar@projectco.com. Please include the Project ID provided in this email in all future correspondences regarding this request.

    Thank you for your request. We look forward to helping you bring this initiative to fruition.

    Sincerely,

    Jim Fraser

    PMO Director, Information Technology Services

    Info-Tech Insight

    A simple request response will go a long way in terms of stakeholder management. It will not only help assure stakeholders that their requests are in progress but the request confirmation will also help to set expectations and take some of the mystery out of IT’s processes.

    Document your process to triage project requests

    2.1.4 Estimated Time: 30-60 minutes

    Review and customize section 2.3, “Triage project requests” in Info-Tech’s Project Intake, Approval, and Prioritization SOP Template.

    The goal of optimizing this process is to divert non-project requests and set an appropriate initial set of stakeholder expectations for next steps. The important decisions to document for this step include:

    1. What defines a project? Record the outcomes of Activities 2.1.3 into the SOP.
    2. Who triages the requests and assign request liaisons? Who are they? For example, a lead BA can assign a set roster of BAs to project requests.
    3. What are the steps to follow for sending the initial response? See the previous slides on automated responses vs. detailed, tailored responses.
    4. How will you account for the consumption of resource capacity? For example, impose a maximum of four hours per week per analyst, and track the hours worked for each request to establish a pattern for capacity consumption.
    5. Who will handle exceptions? For example, PMO will maintain this process and will handle any questions or issues that pertain to this part of the process.

    INPUT

    • Results of activity 2.1.3

    OUTPUT

    • SOP for triaging project requests

    Materials

    • SOP Template

    Participants

    • PMO Director/ Portfolio Manager
    • Business Analysts

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Whatever method of request collection you choose, ensure there is no doubt about how requesters can access the intake form.

    Follow up on requests to define project scope and set realistic expectations

    The purpose of this follow-up is to foster communication among the requestor, IT, and the sponsor to scope the project at a high level. The follow-up should:

    • Clarify the goals and value of the request.
    • Begin to manage expectations based on initial assessment of feasibility.
    • Ensure the right information is available for evaluating project proposals downstream. Every project should have the below key pieces of scope defined before any further commitments are made.

    Focus on Defining Key Pieces of Scope

    • Budget (funding, source)
    • Business outcome
    • Completion criteria
    • Timeframes (start date and duration)
    • Milestones/deliverables

    Structure the Follow-Up Process to Enhance Alignment Between IT and the Business

    Once a Request Liaison (RL) has been assigned to a request, it is their responsibility to schedule time (if necessary) with the requestor to perform a scoping exercise that will help define preliminary requirements. Ideally, this follow-up should occur no later than a week of the initial request.

    Structure the follow-up for each request based on your preliminary estimates of project size (next slide). Use the “Key Pieces of Scope” to the left as a guide.

    It may also be helpful for RLs and stakeholders to work together to produce a rough diagram or mock-up of the final deliverable. This will ensure that the stakeholder’s idea has been properly communicated, and it could also help refine or broaden this idea based on IT’s capabilities.

    After the scoping exercise, it is the RL’s responsibility to inform the requestor of next steps.

    Info-Tech Insight

    More time spent with stakeholders defining high-level requirements during the ideation phase is key to project success. It will not only improve the throughput of projects, but it will enhance the transparency of IT’s capacity and enable IT to more effectively support business processes.

    Perform a preliminary estimation of project size

    Project estimation is a common pain point felt by many organizations. At this stage, a range-of-magnitude (ROM) estimate is sufficient for the purposes of sizing the effort required for developing project proposals with appropriate detail.

    A way to structure ROM estimates is to define a set of standard project levels. It will help you estimate 80% of projects with sufficient accuracy over time with little effort. The remaining 20% of projects that don’t meet their standard target dates can be managed as exceptions.

    The increased consistency of most projects will enable you to focus more on managing the exceptions.

    Example of standard project sizes:

    Level Primary unit of estimation Target completion date*
    1 Weeks 3 weeks – 3 months
    2 Months 3 months – 6 months
    3 Quarters 2 – 4 quarters
    3+ Years 1 year or more

    * Target completion date is simply that – a target, not a service level agreement (SLA). Some exceptions will far exceed the target date, e.g. projects that depend heavily on external or uncontrollable factors.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Project levelling is useful for right-sizing many downstream processes; it sets appropriate levels of detail and scrutiny expected for project approval and prioritization steps, as well as the appropriate extent of requirements gathering, project management, and reporting requirements afterwards.

    Set your thresholds for level 2 and level 3 projects

    2.1.5 Estimated Time: 30 minutes

    Now that the minimum threshold for your smallest projects has been identified, it’s time to identify the maximum threshold in order to better apply project intake, approval, and prioritization rigor where it’s needed.

    1. Looking at your project list (e.g. Activity 1.1.1, or your current project backlog), isolate the medium and large projects. Examine the two categories in turn.
    2. Start with the medium projects. Using the criteria identified in Activity 2.1.3, identify where your level one category ends.
    • What are the commonly recurring thresholds that distinguish medium-sized projects from smaller initiatives?
    • Are there any criteria that would need to take on a greater importance when making the distinction? For instance, will cost or duration take on a greater weighting when determining level thresholds?
    • Once you have reached consensus, record these in the table on the next slide.
  • Now examine your largest projects. Once again relying on the criteria from Activity 2.1.3, determine where your medium-sized projects end and your large projects begin.
    • What are the commonly recurring thresholds that distinguish large and extra-large projects from medium-sized initiatives?
    • Once you have reached consensus, records these in the table on the next slide.

    INPUT

    • Leveling criteria from Activity 2.1.3
    • Project backlog, or list of projects from Activity 1.1.1

    OUTPUT

    • Clarity around how to define your level two and three projects

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • The project level table on the next slide

    Participants

    • PMO Director/ Portfolio Manager
    • Project Managers
    • Business Analysts
    • PMO Admin Staff

    Sample Project Levels Table

    Project Level Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
    Work Effort 40-100 hours 100-500 hours 500+ hours
    Budget $100,000 and under $100,000 to $500,000 $500,000 and over
    Technology In-house expertise Familiar New or requires system-wide change/training
    Complexity Well-defined solution; no problems expected Solution is known; some problems expected Solution is unknown or not clearly defined
    Cross-Functional Workgroups/Teams 1-2 3-5 > 6

    Apply a computation decision-making method for project levelling

    2.1.5 Project Intake Classification Matrix

    Capture the project levels in Info-Tech’s Project Intake Classification Matrix Tool to benchmark your levelling criteria and to determine project levels for proposed projects.

    Download Info-Tech’s Project Intake Classification Matrix tool.

    A screenshot of Info-Tech's Project Intake Classification Matrix Tool, tab 2 is shown.
    1. Pick a category to define project levels.
    2. Enter the descriptions for each project level.
    3. Assign a relative weight for each category.
    4. A screenshot of Info-Tech's Project Intake Classification Matrix Tool, tab 3 is shown.
    5. Enter a project name.
    6. Choose the description that best fits the project. If unknown, leave it blank.
    7. Suggested project levels are displayed.

    Get tentative buy-in and support from an executive sponsor for project requests

    In most organizations a project requires sponsorship from the executive layer, especially for strategic initiatives. The executive sponsor provides several vital factors for projects:

    • Funding and resources
    • Direct support and oversight of the project leadership
    • Accountability, acting as the ultimate decision maker for the project
    • Ownership of, and commitment to, project benefits

    Sometimes a project request may be made directly by a sponsor; in other times, the Request Liaison may need to connect the project request to a project sponsor.

    In either case, project request has a tentative buy-in and support of an executive sponsor before a project request is developed into a proposal and examined for approval – the subject of this blueprint’s next step.

    PMs and Sponsors: The Disconnect

    A study in project sponsorship revealed a large gap between the perception of the project managers and the perception of sponsors relative to the sponsor capability. The widest gaps appear in the areas of:

    • Motivation: 34% of PMs say sponsors frequently motivate the team, compared to 82% of executive sponsors who say they do so.
    • Active listening: 42% of PMs say that sponsors frequently listen actively, compared to 88% of executive sponsors who say they do so.
    • Effective communication: 47% of PMs say sponsors communicate effectively and frequently, compared to 92% of executive sponsors who say they do so.
    • Managing change: 37% of PMs say sponsors manage change, compared to 82% of executive sponsors who say they do so.

    Source: Boston Consulting Group/PMI, 2014

    Actively engaged executive sponsors continue to be the top driver of whether projects meet their original goals and business intent.

    – PMI Pulse of the Profession, 2017

    76% of respondents [organizations] agree that the role of the executive sponsor has grown in importance over the past five years.

    – Boston Consulting Group/PMI, 2014

    Document your process to follow up on project requests

    2.1.6 45 minutes

    Review and customize section 2.4, “Follow up on project requests” in Info-Tech’s Project Intake, Approval, and Prioritization SOP Template.

    The goal of optimizing this process is to initiate communication among the requestor, IT, and the sponsor to scope the project requests at a high level. The important decisions to document for this step include:

    1. How will you perform a scoping exercise with the requestor? Leverage existing organizational processes (e.g. high-level requirements gathering). Look to the previous slides for suggested outcomes of the exercise.
    2. How will you determine project levels? Record the outcomes of activities 2.1.5 into the SOP.
    3. How will the RL follow up on the scoped project request with a project sponsor? For example, project requests scoped at a high level will be presented to senior leadership whose lines of business are affected by the proposed project to gauge their initial interest.
    4. How will you account for the consumption of resource capacity? For example, impose a maximum of 8 hours per week per analyst, and track the hours worked for each request to establish a pattern for capacity consumption.
    5. Who will handle exceptions? For example, PMO will maintain this process and will handle any questions or issues that pertain to this part of the process.

    INPUT

    • Activity 2.1.5
    • Existing processes for scoping exercises

    OUTPUT

    • SOP for following up on project requests

    Materials

    • SOP Template

    Participants

    • PMO Director/ Portfolio Manager
    • Project Managers
    • Business Analysts
    • PMO Admin Staff

    Examine the new project intake workflow as a whole and document it in a flow chart

    2.1.7 Estimated Time: 30-60 minutes

    Review and customize section 2.1, “Project Intake Workflow” in Info-Tech’s Project Intake, Approval, and Prioritization SOP Template.

    In Step 1.2 of the blueprint, you mapped out the current project intake, approval, and prioritization workflow and documented it in a flow chart. In this step, take the time to examine the new project intake process as a whole, and document the new workflow in the form of a flow chart.

    1. Requestor fills out form and submits the request.
    2. Requests are triaged into the proper queue.
    3. BA or PM prepares to develop requests into a project proposal.
    4. Requestor is given realistic expectations for approval process.

    Consider the following points:

    1. Are the inputs and outputs of each step clear? Who’s doing the work? How long will each step take, on average?
    2. Is the ownership of each step clear? How will we ensure a smooth handoff between each step and prevent requests from falling through the cracks?

    INPUT

    • New process steps for project intake (Activities 2.1.2-6)

    OUTPUT

    • Flowchart representation of new project intake workflow

    Materials

    • Microsoft Visio, flowchart software, or Microsoft PowerPoint

    Participants

    • PMO Director/ Portfolio Manager
    • Project Managers
    • Business Analysts
    • PMO Admin Staff

    Case study: Portfolio manager achieves intake and project success through detailed request follow-up

    Case Study

    Industry: Municipal Government

    Source: Info-Tech Client

    Challenge

    • There is an IT department with a relatively high level of project management maturity.
    • They have approximately 30 projects on the go, ranging from small to large.
    • To help with intake, IT assembled a project initiation team. It was made up of managers from throughout the county. This group “owned the talent” and met once a month to assess requests. As a group, they were able to assemble project teams quickly.

    Solution

    • Project initiation processes kept failing. A lot of time was spent within IT getting estimations precise, only to have sponsors reject business cases because they did not align with what those sponsors had in mind.
    • Off-the-grid projects were a challenge. Directors did not follow intake process and IT talent was torn in multiple directions. There was nothing in place for protecting the talent and enforcing processes on stakeholders.

    Results

    • IT dedicated a group of PMs and BAs to follow up on requests.
    • Working with stakeholders, this group collects specific pieces of information that allows IT to get to work on requests faster. Through this process, requests reach the charter stage more quickly and with greater success.
    • An intake ticketing system was established to protect IT talent. Workers are now better equipped to redirect stakeholders through to the proper channels.

    Step 2.2: Set up steps of project approval to maximize strategic alignment while right-sizing the required effort

    PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3

    1.1

    Define project valuation criteria

    1.2

    Envision process target state

    2.1

    Streamline intake

    2.2

    Right-size approval steps

    2.3

    Prioritize projects to fit resource capacity

    3.1

    Pilot your optimized process

    3.2

    Communicate organizational change

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Perform a deeper retrospective on current project approval process
    • Define the approval steps, their accountabilities, and the corresponding terminologies for approval
    • Right-size effort and documentation required for each project level through the approval steps

    This step involves the following participants:

    • PMO Director / Portfolio Manager
    • Project Managers
    • Business Analysts
    • PMO Administrative Staff

    Outcomes of this step

    • Retrospective of the current project intake process: to continue doing, to start doing, and to stop doing
    • A series of approval steps are defined, in which their accountabilities, responsibilities, and the nomenclature for what is approved at each steps are clarified and documented
    • A toolbox of deliverables for proposed projects that captures key information developed to inform project approval decisions at each step of the approval process, and the organizational standard for what to use for which project level
    • Documentation of the optimized process in the SOP document

    Set up an incremental series of approval stage-gates to tackle common challenges in project approval

    This section will help you address key challenges IT leaders face around project approval.

    Challenges Info-Tech’s Advice
    Project sponsors receive funding from their business unit or other source (possibly external, such as a grant), and assume this means their project is “approved” without any regard to IT costs or resource constraints. Clearly define a series of approval steps, and communicate requirements for passing them.
    Business case documentation is rarely updated to reflect unforeseen costs, emerging opportunities, and changing priorities. As a result, time and money is spent finishing diminished priority projects while the value of more recent projects erodes in the backlog. Approve projects in smaller pieces, with early test/pilot phases focused on demonstrating the value of later phases.
    Project business cases often focus on implementation and overlook ongoing operating costs imposed on IT after the project is finished. These costs further diminish IT’s capacity for new projects, unless investment in more capacity (such as hiring) is included in business cases. Make ongoing support and maintenance costs a key element in business case templates and evaluations.
    Organizations approve new projects without regard to the availability of resource capacity (or lack thereof). Project lead times grow and stakeholders become more dissatisfied because IT is unable to show how the business is competing with itself for IT’s time. Increase visibility into what IT is already working on and committed to, and for whom.

    Develop a project approval workflow

    Clearly define a series of approval steps, and communicate requirements for passing them. “Approval” can be a dangerous word in project and portfolio management, so it is important to clarify what is required to pass each step, and how long the process will take.

    1 2 3 4
    Approval step Concept Approval Feasibility Approval Business Case Approval Resource Allocation (Prioritization)
    Alignment Focus Business need / Project sponsorship Technology Organization-wide business need Resource capacity
    Possible dispositions at each gate
    • Approve developing project proposal
    • Reject concept
    • Proceed to business case approval
    • Approve a test/pilot project for feasibility
    • Reject proposal
    • Approve project and funding in full
    • Approve a test/pilot project for viability
    • Reject proposal
    • Begin or continue project work
    • Hold project
    • Outsource project
    • Reject project
    Accountability e.g. Project Sponsor e.g. CIO e.g. Steering Committee e.g. CIO
    Deliverable Benefits Commitment Form Template Proposed Project Technology Assessment Tool Business Case (Fast Track, Comprehensive) Intake and Prioritization Tool

    Identify the decision-making paradigm at each step

    In general, there are three different, mutually exclusive decision-making paradigms for approving projects:

    Paradigm Description Benefits Challenges Recommendation
    Unilateral authority One individual makes decisions. Decisions tend to be made efficiently and unambiguously. Consistency of agenda is easier to preserve. Decisions are subject to one person’s biases and unseen areas. Decision maker should solicit and consider input from others and seek objective rigor.
    Ad hoc deliberation Stakeholders informally negotiate and communicate decisions between themselves. Deliberation helps ensure different perspectives are considered to counterbalance individual biases and unseen areas. Ad hoc decisions tend to lack documentation and objective rationale, which can perpetuate disagreement. Use where unilateral decisions are unfeasible (due to complexity, speed of change, culture, etc.), and stakeholders are very well aligned or highly skilled negotiators and communicators.
    Formal steering committee A select group that represent various parts of the organization is formally empowered to make decisions for the organization. Formal committees can ensure oversight into decisions, with levers available to help resolve uncertainty or disagreement. Formal committees introduce administrative overhead and effort that might not be warranted by the risks involved. Formal steering committees are best where formality is warranted by the risks and costs involved, and the organizational culture has an appetite for administrative oversight.

    Info-Tech Insight

    The individual or party who has the authority to make choices, and who is ultimately answerable for those decisions, is said to be accountable. Understanding the needs of the accountable party is critical to the success of the project approval process optimization efforts.

    Perform a start-stop-continue exercise to help determine what is working and what is not working

    2.2.1 Estimated Time: 45 minutes

    Optimizing project approval may not require a complete overhaul of your existing processes. You may only need to tweak certain templates or policies. Perhaps you started out with a strong process and simply lost resolve over time – in which case you will need to focus on establishing motivation and discipline, rather than rework your entire process.

    Perform a start-stop-continue exercise with your team to help determine what should be salvaged, what should be abandoned, and what should be introduced:

    1.On a whiteboard or equivalent, write “Start,” “Stop,” and “Continue” in three separate columns. 3.As a group, discuss the responses and come to an agreement as to which are most valid.
    2.Equip your team with sticky notes or markers and have them populate the columns with ideas and suggestions surrounding your current processes. 4.;Document the responses to help structure your game plan for intake optimization.
    StartStopContinue
    • Inject technical feasibility approval step as an input to final approval
    • Simplify business cases
    • Approve low-value projects
    • Take too long in proposal development
    • Quarterly approval meetings
    • Approve resources for proposal development

    INPUT

    • Current project approval workflow (Activity 1.2.2)
    • Project approval success criteria (Activity 1.2.6)

    OUTPUT

    • Retrospective review of current approval process

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Sticky notes/markers

    Participants

    • PMO Director/ Portfolio Manager
    • Project Managers
    • Business Analysts
    • PMO Admin Staff

    Customize the approval steps and describe them at a high level

    2.2.2 Estimated Time: 30-60 minutes

    Review and customize section 3.2, “Project Approval Steps” in Info-Tech’s Project Intake, Approval, and Prioritization SOP Template.

    The goal of this activity is to customize the definition of the approval steps for your organization, so that it makes sense for the existing organizational governance structure, culture, and need. Use the results of the start-stop-continue to inform what to customize. Consider the following factors:

    1. Order of steps: given the current decision-making paradigm, does it make sense to reorder the steps?
    2. Dispositions at each step: what are the possible dispositions, and who is accountable for making the dispositions?
    3. Project levels: do all projects require three-step approval before they’re up for prioritization? For example, IT steering committee may wish to be involved only for Level 3 projects and Level 2 projects with significant business impact, and not for Level 1 projects and IT-centric Level 2 projects.
    4. Accountability at each step: who makes the decisions?
    5. Who will handle exceptions? Aim to prevent the new process from being circumvented by vocal stakeholders, but also allow for very urgent requests. A quick win to strike this balance is to clarify who will exercise this discretion.

    INPUT

    • Retrospective of current process (Activity 2.2.1)
    • Project level definition
    • Approval steps in the previous slide

    OUTPUT

    • Customized project approval steps for each project level

    Materials

    • Whiteboard

    Participants

    • PMO Director/ Portfolio Manager
    • Project Managers
    • Business Analysts
    • PMO Admin Staff

    Specify what “approval” really means to manage expectations for what project work can be done and when

    2.2.3 Estimated Time: 15 minutes

    Review and customize section 3.2, “Project Approval Steps” in Info-Tech’s Project Intake, Approval, and Prioritization SOP Template.

    In the old reality, projects were approved and never heard back from again, which effectively gave your stakeholders a blanket default expectation of “declined.” With the new approval process, manage your stakeholder expectations more explicitly by refining your vocabulary around approval.

    Within this, decision makers should view their role in approval as approving that which can and should be done. When a project is approved and slated to backlog, the intention should be to allocate resources to it within the current intake cycle.

    Customize the table to the right with organizationally appropriate definitions, and update your SOP.

    “No” Declined.
    “Not Now” “It’s a good idea, but the time isn’t right. Try resubmitting next intake cycle.”
    “Concept Approval” Approval to add the item to the backlog with the intention of starting it this intake cycle.
    “Preliminary Approval” Approval for consumption of PMO resources to develop a business case.
    “Full Approval” Project is greenlighted and project resources are being allocated to it.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Refine the nomenclature. Add context to “approved” and “declined.” Speak in terms of “not now” or “you can have it when these conditions are met.” With clear expectations of the resources required to support each request, you can place accountability for keeping the request alive back on the sponsors.

    Continuously work out a balance between disciplined decision making and “analysis paralysis"

    A graph is depicted to show the relationship between disciplined decision making and analysis paralysis. The sweet spot for disciplined decisions changes between situations and types of decisions.

    A double bar graph is depicted to show the relative effort spent on management practice. The first bar shows that 20% has a high success of portfolio management. 35% has a low success of portfolio management. A caption on the graph: Spending additional time assessing business cases doesn’t necessarily improve success.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Estimates that form the basis of business cases are often based on flawed assumptions. Use early project phases or sprints to build working prototypes to test the assumptions on which business cases are built, rather than investing time improving precision of estimates without improving accuracy.

    Right-size project approval process with Info-Tech’s toolbox of deliverables

    Don’t paint every project with the same brush. Choose the right set of information needed for each project level to maximize the throughput of project approval process.

    The next several slides will take you through a series of tools and templates that help guide the production of deliverables. Each deliverable wireframes the required analysis of the proposed project for one step of the approval process, and captures that information in a document. This breaks down the overall work for proposal development into digestible chunks.

    As previously discussed, aim to right-size the approval process rigor for project levels. Not all project levels may call for all steps of approval, or the extent of required analysis within an approval step may differ. This section will conclude by customizing the requirement for deliverables for each project level.

    Tools and Templates for the Project Approval Toolbox

    • Benefits Commitment Form Template (.xlsx) Document the project sponsor’s buy-in and commitment to proposed benefits in a lightweight fashion.
    • Proposed Technology Assessment Tool (.xlsx) Determine the proposed project’s readiness for adoption from a technological perspective.
    • Business Case Templates (.docx) Guide the analysis process for the overall project proposal development in varying levels of detail.

    Use Info-Tech’s lightweight Benefits Commitment Form Template to document the sponsor buy-in and support

    2.2.4 Benefits Commitment Form Template

    Project sponsors are accountable for the realization of project benefits. Therefore, for a project to be approved by a project sponsor, they must buy-in and commit to the proposed benefits.

    Defining project benefits and obtaining project sponsor commitment has been demonstrated to improve the project outcome by providing the focal point of the project up-front. This will help reduce wasted efforts to develop parts of the proposals that are not ultimately needed.

    A double bar graph titled: Benefits realization improves project outcome is shown.

    Download Info-Tech’s Benefits Commitment Form Template.

    Contents of a Benefits Commitment Form

    • One-sentence highlight of benefits and risks
    • Primary benefit, hard (quantitative) and soft (qualitative)
    • Proposed measurements for metrics
    • Responsible and accountable parties for benefits
    A screenshot of Info-Tech's Establish the Benefits Realization Process blueprint is shown.

    For further discussion on benefits realization, use Info-Tech’s blueprint, Establish the Benefits Realization Process.

    Use Info-Tech’s Proposed Project Technology Assessment Tool to analyze a technology’s readiness for adoption

    2.2.4 Proposed Project Technology Assessment Tool

    In some projects, there needs to be an initial idea of what the project might look like. Develop a high-level solution for projects that:

    • Are very different from previous projects.
    • Are fairly complex, or not business as usual.
    • Require adoption of new technology or skill set.

    IT should advise and provide subject matter expertise on the technology requirements to those that ultimately approve the proposed projects, so that they can take into account additional costs or risks that may be borne from it.

    Info-Tech’s Proposed Project Technology Assessment Tool has a series of questions to address eight categories of considerations to determine the project’s technological readiness for adoption. Use this tool to ensure that you cover all the bases, and help you devise alternate solutions if necessary – which will factor into the overall business case development.

    Download Info-Tech’s Proposed Project Technology Assessment Tool.

    A screenshot of Info-Tech's Proposed Project Technology Assessment Tool is shown.

    Enable project valuation beyond financial metrics with Info-Tech’s Business Case Templates

    2.2.4 Business Case Template (Comprehensive and Fast Track)

    Traditionally, a business case is centered around financial metrics. While monetary benefits and costs are matters of bottom line and important, financial metrics are only part of a project’s value. As the project approval decisions must be based on the holistic comparison of project value, the business case document must capture all the necessary – and only those that are necessary – information to enable it.

    However, completeness of information does not always require comprehensiveness. Allow for flexibility to speed up the process of developing business plan by making a “fast-track” business case template available. This enables the application of the project valuation criteria with all other projects, with right-sized effort.

    Alarming business case statistics

    • Only one-third of companies always prepare a business case for new projects.
    • Nearly 45% of project managers admit they are unclear on the business objectives of their IT projects.

    (Source: Wrike)

    Download Info-Tech’s Comprehensive Business Case Template.

    A screenshot of Info-Tech's Comprehensive Business Case Template is shown.

    Download Info-Tech’s Fast Track Business Case Template.

    A screenshot of Info-Tech's Fast Track Business Case Template is shown.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Pass on that which is known. Valuable information about projects is lost due to a disconnect between project intake and project initiation, as project managers are typically not brought on board until project is actually approved. This will be discussed more in Phase 3 of this blueprint.

    Document the right-sized effort and documentation required for each project level

    2.2.4 Estimated Time:60-90 minutes

    Review and customize section 3.3, “Project Proposal Deliverables” in Info-Tech’s Project Intake, Approval, and Prioritization SOP Template.

    The goal of this activity is to customize the requirements for project proposal deliverables, so that it properly informs each of the approval steps discussed in the previous activity. The deliverables will also shape the work effort required for projects of various levels. Consider the following factors:

    1. Project levels: what deliverables should be required, recommended, or suggested for each of the project levels? How will exceptions be handled, and who will be accountable?
    2. Existing project proposal documents: what existing proposal documents, tools and templates can we leverage for the newly optimized approval steps?
    3. Skills availability: do these tools and templates represent a significant departure from the current state? If so, is there capacity (time and skill) to achieve the desired target state?
    4. How will you account for the consumption of resource capacity? Do a rough order of estimate for the resource capacity consumed the new deliverable standard.
    5. Who will handle exceptions? For example, PMO will maintain this process and will handle any questions or issues that pertain to this part of the process.

    INPUT

    • Process steps (Activity 2.2.2)
    • Current approval workflow(Activity 1.2.1)
    • Artifacts introduced in the previous slides

    OUTPUT

    • Requirement for artifacts and effort for each approval step

    Materials

    • Whiteboard

    Participants

    • PMO Director/ Portfolio Manager
    • Project Managers
    • Business Analysts
    • PMO Admin Staff

    Examine the new project approval workflow as a whole and document it in a flow chart

    2.2.5 Estimated Time: 30-60 minutes

    Review and customize section 3.1, “Project Approval Workflow” in Info-Tech’s Project Intake, Approval, and Prioritization SOP Template.

    In Step 1.2 of the blueprint, you mapped out the current project intake, approval, and prioritization workflow and documented it in a flow chart. In this step, take the time to examine the new project intake process as a whole, and document the new workflow in the form of a flow chart.

    1 2 3 4
    Approval Step Concept Approval Feasibility Approval Business Case Approval Resource Allocation (Prioritization)
    Alignment Focus Business need/ Project Sponsorship Technology

    Organization-wide

    Business need

    Resource capacity

    Consider the following points:

    1. Are the inputs and outputs of each step clear? Who’s doing the work? How long will each step take, on average?
    2. Is the ownership of each step clear? How will we ensure a smooth hand-off between each step and prevent requests from falling through the cracks?

    INPUT

    • New process steps for project approval (Activities 2.2.2-4)

    OUTPUT

    • Flowchart representation of new project approval workflow

    Materials

    • Microsoft Visio, flowchart software, or Microsoft PowerPoint

    Participants

    • PMO Director/ Portfolio Manager
    • Project Managers
    • Business Analysts
    • PMO Admin Staff

    Step 2.3: Prioritize projects to maximize the value of the project portfolio within the constraint of resource capacity

    PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3

    1.1

    Define project valuation criteria

    1.2

    Envision process target state

    2.1

    Streamline intake

    2.2

    Right-size approval steps

    2.3

    Prioritize projects to fit resource capacity

    3.1

    Pilot your optimized process

    3.2

    Communicate organizational change

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Perform a deeper retrospective on current project prioritization process
    • Optimize your process to maintain resource capacity supply and project demand data
    • Optimize your process to formally make disposition recommendations to appropriate decision makers

    This step involves the following participants:

    • PMO Director / Portfolio Manager
    • Project Managers
    • Business Analysts
    • PMO Administrative Staff

    Outcomes of this step

    • Retrospective of the current project prioritization process: to continue doing, to start doing, and to stop doing
    • Realistic estimate of available resource capacity, in the absence of a resource management practice
    • Optimized process for presenting the decision makers with recommendations and facilitating capacity-constrained steering of the project portfolio
    • Project Intake and Prioritization Tool for facilitating the prioritization process
    • Documentation of the optimized process in the SOP document

    The availability of staff time is rarely factored into IT project and service delivery commitments

    A lot gets promised and worked on, and staff are always busy, but very little actually gets done – at least not within given timelines or to expected levels of quality.

    Organizations tend to bite off more than they can chew when it comes to project and service delivery commitments involving IT resources.

    While the need for businesses to make an excess of IT commitments is understandable, the impacts of systemically over-allocating IT are clearly negative:

    • Stakeholder relations suffer. Promises are made to the business that can’t be met by IT.
    • IT delivery suffers. Project timelines and quality frequently suffer, and service support regularly lags.
    • Employee engagement suffers. Anxiety and stress levels are consistently high among IT staff, while morale and engagement levels are low.

    76%: 76% of organizations say they have too many projects on the go and an unmanageable and ever-growing backlog of things to get to.

    – Cooper, 2014

    70%: Almost 70% of workers feel as though they have too much work on their plates and not enough time to do it.

    – Reynolds, 2016

    Unconstrained, unmanaged demand leads to prioritization of work based on consequences rather than value

    Problems caused by the organizational tendency to make unrealistic delivery commitments is further complicated by the reality of the matrix environment.

    Today, many IT departments use matrix organization. In this system, demands on a resource’s time come from many directions. While resources are expected to prioritize their work, they lack the authority to formally reject any demand. As a result, unconstrained, unmanaged demand frequently outstrips the supply of work-hours the resource can deliver.

    When this happens, the resource has three options:

    1. Work more hours, typically without compensation.
    2. Choose tasks not to do in a way that minimizes personal consequences.
    3. Diminish work quality to meet quantity demands.

    The result is an unsustainable system for all those involved:

    1. Individual workers cannot meet expectations, leading to frustration and disengagement.
    2. Managers cannot deliver on the projects or services they manage and struggle to retain skilled resources who are looking elsewhere for “greener pastures.”
    3. Executives cannot execute strategic plans as they lose decision-making power over their resources.

    Prioritize project demand by project value to get the most out of constrained project capacity – but practicing it is difficult

    The theory may be simple and intuitive, but the practice is extremely challenging. There are three practical challenges to making project prioritization effective.

    Project Prioritization

    Capacity awareness

    Many IT departments struggle to realistically estimate available project capacity in a credible way. Stakeholders question the validity of your endeavor to install capacity-constrained intake process, and mistake it for unwillingness to cooperate instead.

    Lack of authority

    Many PMOs and IT departments simply lack the ability to decline or defer new projects.

    Many moving parts

    Project intake, approval, and prioritization involve the coordination of various departments. Therefore, they require a great deal of buy-in and compliance from multiple stakeholders and senior executives.

    Project Approval

    Unclear definition of value

    Defining the project value is difficult, because there are so many different and conflicting ways that are all valid in their own right. However, without it, it's impossible to fairly compare among projects to select what's "best."

    Unclear definition of value

    In Step 1.1 of the blueprint, we took the first step toward resolving this challenge by prototyping a project valuation scorecard.

    A screenshot of Step 1.1 of this blueprint is shown.

    "Prioritization is a huge issue for us. We face the simultaneous challenges of not having enough resources but also not having a good way to say no. "

    – CIO, governmental health agency

    Address the challenges of capacity awareness and authority with a project prioritization workflow

    Info-Tech recommends following a four-step process for managing project prioritization.

    1. Collect and update supply and demand data
      1. Re-evaluate project value for all proposed, on-hold and ongoing projects
      2. Estimate available resource capacity for projects
    2. Prioritize project demand by value
      1. Identify highest-value, “slam-dunk” projects
      2. Identify medium-value, “on-the-bubble” projects
      3. Identify lower-value projects that lie beyond the available capacity
    3. Approve projects for initiation or continuation
      1. Submit recommendations for review
      2. Adjust prioritized list with business judgment
      3. Steering committee approves projects to work on
    4. Manage a realistically defined project portfolio
    • Stakeholder Need
    • Strategic Objectives
    • Resource Capacity

    Intake and Prioritization Tool

    Perform a start-stop-continue exercise to help determine what is working and what is not working

    2.3.1 Estimated Time: 60 minutes

    Optimizing project prioritization may not require a complete overhaul of your existing processes. You may only need to tweak certain templates or policies. Perhaps you started out with a strong process and simply lost resolve over time – in which case you will need to focus on establishing motivation and discipline, rather than rework your entire process.

    Perform a start-stop-continue exercise with your team to help determine what should be salvaged, what should be abandoned, and what should be introduced:

    1. On a whiteboard or equivalent, write “Start,” “Stop,” and “Continue” in three separate columns. 3. As a group, discuss the responses and come to an agreement as to which are most valid.
    2. Equip your team with sticky notes or markers and have them populate the columns with ideas and suggestions surrounding your current processes. 4. Document the responses to help structure your game plan for intake optimization.
    Start Stop Continue
    • Periodically review the project value scorecard with business stakeholders
    • “Loud Voices First” prioritization
    • Post-prioritization score changes
    • Updating project value scores for current projects

    INPUT

    • Current project prioritization workflow (Activity 1.2.2)
    • Project prioritization success criteria (Activity 1.2.6)

    OUTPUT

    • Retrospective review of current prioritization process

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Sticky notes/markers

    Participants

    • PMO Director/ Portfolio Manager
    • Project Managers
    • Business Analysts
    • PMO Admin Staff

    Use Info-Tech’s lightweight Intake and Prioritization Tool to get started on capacity-constrained project prioritization

    Use Info-Tech’s Project Intake and Prioritization Tool to facilitate the scorecard-driven prioritization and ensure effective flow of data.

    This tool builds on the Project Valuation Scorecard Tool to address the challenges in project prioritization:

    1. Lack of capacity awareness: quickly estimate a realistic supply of available work hours for projects for a given prioritization period, in the absence of a reliable and well-maintained resource utilization and capacity data.
    2. Using standard project sizing, quickly estimate the size of the demand for proposed and ongoing projects and produce a report that recommends the list of projects to greenlight – and highlight the projects within that list that are at risk of being short-charged of resources – that will aim to help you tackle:

    3. Lack of authority to say “no” or “not yet” to projects: save time and effort in presenting the results of project prioritization analysis that will enable the decision makers to make well-informed, high-quality portfolio decisions.
    4. The next several slides will walk you through the tool and present activities to facilitate its use for your organization.

    Download Info-Tech’s Project Intake and Prioritization Tool.

    A screenshot of Info-Tech's Project Intake Prioritization Tool is shown.

    Create a high-level estimate of available project capacity to inform how many projects can be greenlighted

    2.3.2 Project Intake and Prioritization Tool, Tab 2: Project Capacity

    Estimate how many work-hours are at your disposal for projects using Info-Tech’s resource calculator.

    A screenshot of Info-Tech's Project Intake and Prioritization Tool, Tab 2: Project Capacity

    1. Compile a list of each role within your department, the number of staff, and the hours in a typical work week.

    2. Enter the foreseeable out-of-office time (vacation, sick time, etc.). Typically, this value is 12-16% depending on the region.

    3. Enter how much working time is spent on non-projects for each role: administrative duties and “keep the lights on” work.

    4. Select a period of time for breaking down available resource capacity in hours.

    Project Work (%): Percentage of your working time that goes toward project work is calculated as what’s left after your non-project working time allocations have been subtracted.

    Project (h) Total Percentage: Take a note of this percentage as your project capacity. This number will put the estimated project demand in context for the rest of the tool.

    Example for a five-day work week:

    • 2 weeks (10 days) of statutory holidays
    • 3 weeks of vacation
    • 1.4 weeks (7 days) of sick days on average
    • 1 week (5 days) for company holidays

    Result: 7.4/52 weeks’ absence = 14%

    Estimate your available project capacity for the next quarter, half-year, or year

    2.3.2 Estimated Time: 30 minutes

    Discover how many work-hours are at your disposal for project work.

    1. Use the wisdom-of-the-crowd approach or resource utilization data to fill out Tab 2 of the tool. This is intended to be somewhat of a rough estimate; avoid the pitfall of being too granular in role or in time split.
    2. Choose a time period that corresponds to your project prioritization period: monthly, quarterly, 4 months, semi-annually (6 months), or annually.
    3. Examine the pie graph representation of your overall capacity breakdown, like the one shown below.

    Screenshot from Tab 2 of Project Intake and Prioritization Tool

    INPUT

    • Knowledge of organization’s personnel and their distribution of time

    OUTPUT

    • Estimate of available project capacity

    Materials

    • Project Intake and Prioritization Tool

    Participants

    • PMO Director/ Portfolio Manager
    • Project Managers
    • Business Analysts
    • PMO Admin Staff

    On average, only about half of the available project capacity results in productive project work

    Place realistic expectations on your resources’ productivity.

    Info-Tech’s PPM Current State Scorecard diagnostic provides a comprehensive view of your portfolio management strengths and weaknesses, including project portfolio management, project management, customer management, and resource utilization.

    A screenshot of Info-Tech's PPM Current State Scorecard diagnostic

    Use the wisdom of the crowd to estimate resource waste in:

    • Cancelled projects
    • Inefficiency
    • Suboptimal assignment of resources
    • Unassigned resources
    • Analyzing, fixing, and redeploying

    50% of PPM resource is wasted on average, effectively halving your available project capacity.

    Source: Info-Tech PPM Current State Scorecard

    Define project capacity and project t-shirt sizes

    2.3.3 Project Intake and Prioritization Tool, Tab 3: Settings

    The resource capacity calculator in the previous tab yields a likely optimistic estimate for how much project capacity is available. Based on this estimate as a guide, enter your optimistic (maximum) and pessimistic (minimum) estimates of project capacity as a percentage of total capacity:

    A screenshot of Info-Tech's Project Intake and Prioritization Tool Tab 3

    Info-Tech’s data shows that only about 50% of time spent on project work is wasted: cancelled projects, inefficiency, rework, etc. As a general rule, enter half of your maximum estimate of your project capacity.

    Capacity in work hours is shown here from the previous tab, to put the percentages in context. This example shows a quarterly breakdown (Step 4 from the previous slide; cell N5 in Tab 2.).

    Next, estimate the percentage of your maximum estimated project capacity that a single project would typically consume in the given period for prioritization.

    A screenshot of Info-Tech's Project Intake and Prioritization Tool Tab 3

    These project sizes might not line up with the standard project levels from Step 2.1 of the blueprint: for example, an urgent mid-sized project that requires all hands on deck may need to consume almost 100% of maximum available project capacity.

    Estimate available project capacity and standard project demand sizes for prioritizing project demand

    2.3.3 Estimated Time: 30 minutes

    Refine your estimates of project capacity supply and demand as it applies to a prioritization period.

    1. The estimated project capacity from Activity 2.3.2 represents a theoretical limit. It is most likely an overestimation (see box below). As a group, discuss and decide on a more realistic available project capacity:
      1. Optimistic estimate, assuming sustained peak productivity from everyone in your organization;
      2. Pessimistic estimate, taking into account the necessary human downtime and the PPM resource waste (see previous slide).
    2. Refine the choices of standard project effort sizes, expressed as percentages of maximum project capacity. As a reminder, this sizing is for the chosen prioritization period, and is independent from the project levels set previously in Activity 2.1.4 and 2.1.5.

    Dedicated work needs dedicated break time

    In a study conducted by the Draugiem Group, the ideal work-to-break ratio for maximizing focus and productivity was 52 minutes of work, followed by 17 minutes of rest (Evans). This translates to 75% of resource capacity yielding productive work, which could inform your optimistic estimate of project capacity.

    INPUT

    • Project capacity (Activity 2.3.2)
    • PPM Current State Scorecard (optional)

    OUTPUT

    • Capacity and demand estimate data for tool use

    Materials

    • Project Intake and Prioritization Tool

    Participants

    • PMO Director/ Portfolio Manager
    • Project Managers
    • Business Analysts
    • PMO Admin Staff

    Finish setting up the Project Intake and Prioritization Tool

    2.3.4 Project Intake and Prioritization Tool, Tab 3: Settings

    Enter the scoring criteria, which was worked out from Step 1.1 of the blueprint. This workbook supports up to ten scoring criteria; use of more than ten may make the prioritization step unwieldy.

    A screenshot of Info-Tech's Project Intake and Prioritization Tool Tab 3

    Leave unused criteria rows blank.

    Choose “value” or “execution” from a drop-down.

    Score does not need to add up to 100.

    Finally, set up the rest of the drop-downs used in the next tab, Project Data. These can be customized to fit your unique project portfolio needs.

    A screenshot of Info-Tech's Project Intake and Prioritization Tool Tab 3

    Enter project data into the Project Intake and Prioritization Tool

    2.3.4 Project Intake and Prioritization Tool, Tab 4: Project Data

    A screenshot of Info-Tech's Project Intake and Prioritization Tool Tab 4

    Ensure that each project has a unique name.

    Completed (or cancelled) projects will not be included in prioritization.

    Choose the standard project size defined in the previous tab.

    Change the heading when you customize the workbook.

    Days in Backlog is calculated from the Date Added column.

    A screenshot of Info-Tech's Project Intake and Prioritization Tool Tab 4

    Overall weighted project prioritization score is calculated as a sum of value and execution scores.

    Weighted value and execution scores are calculated according to the scoring criteria table in the 2. Settings tab.

    Enter the raw scores. Weights will be taken into calculation behind the scenes.

    Spaces for unused intake scores will be greyed out. You can enter data, but they will not affect the calculated scores.

    Document your process to maintain resource capacity supply and project demand data

    2.3.4 Estimated Time: 30 minutes

    Review and customize section 4.2, “Maintain Supply and Demand Data” in Info-Tech’s Project Intake, Approval, and Prioritization SOP Template.

    The goal of this activity is to document the process with which the supply and demand information will be updated for projects. Consider the following factors:

    1. Estimates of resource supply: how often will the resource supply be updated? How are you estimating the range (maximum vs. minimum, optimistic vs. pessimistic)? Leverage your existing organizational process assets for resource management.
    2. Updating project data for proposed projects: when and how often will the project valuation scores be updated? Do you have sufficient inputs? Examine the overall project approval process from Step 2.2 of the blueprint, and ensure that sufficient information is available for project valuation (Activity 2.2.3).
    3. Updating project data for ongoing projects: will you prioritize ongoing projects along with proposed projects? When and how often will the project valuation scores be updated? Do you have sufficient inputs?
    4. How will you account for the consumption of resource capacity? Do a rough order of estimate for the resource capacity consumed in this process.
    5. Who will handle exceptions? For example, PMO will maintain this process and will handle any questions or issues that pertain to this part of the process.

    INPUT

    • Organizational process assets for resource management, strategic planning, etc.
    • Activity 2.3.3
    • Activity 2.2.3

    OUTPUT

    • Process steps for refreshing supply and demand data

    Materials

    • SOP Template
    • Project Intake and Prioritization Tool

    Participants

    • PMO Director/ Portfolio Manager
    • Project Managers
    • Business Analysts
    • PMO Admin Staff

    Prioritized list of projects shows what fits under available project capacity for realizing maximum value

    2.3.5 Project Intake and Prioritization Tool, Tab 5: Results

    The output of the Project Intake and Prioritization Tool is a prioritized list of projects with indicators to show that their demand on project capacity will fit within the estimated available project capacity for the prioritization period.

    A screenshot of Info-Tech's Project Intake and Prioritization Tool Tab 5

    Status indicates whether the project is proposed or ongoing; completed projects are excluded.

    Disposition indicates the course of recommended action based on prioritization.

    Proposed projects display how long they have been sitting in the backlog.

    Projects highlighted yellow are marked as “deliberate” for their dispositions. These projects pose risks of not getting properly resourced. One must proceed with caution if they are to be initiated or continued.

    Provide better support to decision makers with the prioritized list, and be prepared for their steering

    It is the portfolio manager’s responsibility to provide the project portfolio owners with reliable data and enable them to make well-informed decisions for the portfolio.

    The prioritized list of proposed and ongoing projects, and an approximate indication for how they fill out the estimated available resource capacity, provide a meaningful starting ground for discussion on which projects to continue or initiate, to hold, or to proceed with caution.

    However, it is important to recognize the limitation of the prioritization methodology. There may be legitimate reasons why some projects should be prioritized over another that the project valuation method does not successfully capture. At the end of the day, it’s the prerogative of the portfolio owners who carry on the accountabilities to steer the portfolio.

    The portfolio manager has a responsibility to be prepared for reconciling the said steering with the unchanged available resource capacity for project work. What comes off the list of projects to continue or initiate? Or, will we outsource capacity if we must meet irreconcilable demand? The next slide will show how Info-Tech’s tool helps you with this process.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Strive to become the best co-pilot. Constantly iterate on the scoring criteria to better adapt to the portfolio owners’ preference in steering the project portfolio.

    Manipulate the prioritized list with the Force Disposition list

    2.3.5 Project Intake and Prioritization Tool, Tab 5: Results

    The Force Disposition list enables you to inject subjective judgment in project prioritization. Force include and outsource override project prioritization scores and include the projects for approval:

    • Force include counts the project demand against capacity.
    • Outsource, on the other hand, does not count the project demand.
    • Force exclude removes a project from prioritized list altogether, without deleting the row and losing its data.

    A screenshot of Info-Tech's Project Intake and Prioritization Tool Tab 5

    Choose a project name and a disposition using a drop-down.

    Use this list to test out various scenarios, useful for what-if analysis.

    A screenshot of Info-Tech's Project Intake and Prioritization Tool Tab 5

    Document your process to formally make disposition recommendations to appropriate decision-making party

    2.3.5 Estimated Time: 60 minutes

    Review and customize section 4.3, “Approve projects for initiation or continuation” in Info-Tech’s Project Intake, Approval, and Prioritization SOP Template.

    The goal of this activity is to formalize the process of presenting the prioritized list of projects for review, modify the list based on steering decisions, and obtain the portfolio owners’ approval for projects to initiate or continue, hold, or terminate. Consider the following factors:

    1. Existing final approval process: what are the new injections to the current decision-making process for final approval?
    2. Meeting prep, agenda, and follow-up: what are the activities that must be carried out by PMO / portfolio manager to support the portfolio decision makers and obtain final approval?
    3. “Deliberate” projects: what additional information should portfolio owners be presented with, in order to deliberate on the projects at risk of being not properly resourced? For example, consider a value-execution plot (right).

    A screenshot of Info-Tech's Project Intake and Prioritization Tool Tab 5

    INPUT

    • Approval process steps (Activity 2.2.2)
    • Steering Committee process documentation

    OUTPUT

    • Activities for supporting the decision-making body

    Materials

    • SOP Template
    • Project Intake and Prioritization Tool

    Participants

    • CIO
    • PMO Director/ Portfolio Manager
    • Project Managers
    • Business Analysts

    Once a project is approved, pass that which is known on to those responsible for downstream processes

    Aim to be responsible stewards of important and costly information developed throughout project intake, approval, and prioritization processes.

    Once the proposed project is given a green light, the project enters an initiation phase.

    No matter what project management methodology is employed, it is absolutely vital to pass on the knowledge gained and insights developed through the intake, approval, and prioritization processes. This ensures that the project managers and team are informed of the project’s purpose, business benefits, rationale for the project approval, etc. and be able to focus their efforts in realizing the project’s business goals.

    Recognize that this does not aim to create any new artifacts. It is simply a procedural safeguard against the loss of important and costly information assets for your organization.

    A flowchart is shown as an example of business documents leading to the development of a project charter.

    Information from the intake process directly feeds into, for example, developing a project charter.

    Source: PMBOK, 6th edition

    "If the project manager can connect strategy to the project they are leading (and therefore the value that the organization desires by sanctioning the project), they can ensure that the project is appropriately planned and managed to realize those benefits."

    – Randall T. Black, P.Eng., PMP; source: PMI Today

    Examine the new project intake workflow as a whole and document it in a flow chart

    2.3.6 Estimated Time: 30-60 minutes

    Review and customize section 4.1, “Project Prioritization Workflow” in Info-Tech’s Project Intake, Approval, and Prioritization SOP Template.

    In Step 1.2 of the blueprint, you mapped out the current project intake, approval, and prioritization workflow and documented it in a flow chart. In this step, take the time to examine the new project intake process as a whole, and document the new workflow in the form of a flow chart.

    1. Collect and update supply and demand data
    2. Prioritize project demand by value
    3. Approve projects for initiation or continuation
    4. Manage a realistically defined project portfolio

    Consider the following points:

    1. Are the inputs and outputs of each step clear? Who’s doing the work? How long will each step take, on average?
    2. Is the ownership of each step clear? How will we ensure a smooth handoff between each step and prevent requests from falling through the cracks?

    INPUT

    • New process steps for project prioritization (Activities 2.3.x-y)

    OUTPUT

    • Flowchart representation of new project prioritization workflow

    Materials

    • Microsoft Visio, flowchart software, or Microsoft PowerPoint

    Participants

    • CIO
    • PMO Director/ Portfolio Manager
    • Project Managers
    • Business Analysts

    Leverage Info-Tech’s other blueprints to complement your project prioritization processes

    The project capacity estimates overlook a critical piece of the resourcing puzzle for the sake of simplicity: skills. You need the right skills at the right time for the right project.

    Use Info-Tech’s Balance Supply and Demand with Realistic Resource Management Practices blueprint to enhance the quality of information on your project supply.

    A screenshot of Info-Tech's Balance Supply and Demand with Realistic Resource Management Practices blueprint.

    There is more to organizing your project portfolio than a strict prioritization by project value. For example, as with a financial investment portfolio, project portfolio must achieve the right investment mix to balance your risks and leverage opportunities.

    Use Info-Tech’s Maintain an Organized Portfolio blueprint to refine the makeup of your project portfolio.

    A screenshot of Info-Tech's Maintain an Organized Portfolio blueprint.

    Continuous prioritization of projects allow organizations to achieve portfolio responsiveness.

    Use Info-Tech’s Manage an Agile Portfolio blueprint to take prioritization of your project portfolio to the next level.

    A screenshot of Info-Tech's Manage an Agile Portfolio blueprint

    46% of organizations use a homegrown PPM solution. Info-Tech’s Grow Your Own PPM Solution blueprint debuts a spreadsheet-based Portfolio Manager tool that provides key functionalities that integrates those of the Intake and Prioritization Tool with resource management, allocation and portfolio reporting capabilities.

    A screenshot of Info-Tech's Grow Your Own PPM Solution blueprint

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    A picture of an Info-Tech analyst is shown.

    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech’s historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    2.1.2-6

    A screenshot of activities 2.1.2-6 is shown.

    Optimize your process to receive, triage, and follow up on project requests

    Discussion on decision points and topics of consideration will be facilitated to leverage the diverse viewpoints amongst the workshop participants.

    2.3.2-5

    A screenshot of activities 2.3.2-5 is shown.

    Set up a capacity-informed project prioritization process using Info-Tech’s Project Intake and Prioritization Tool

    A table-top planning exercise helps you visualize the current process in place and identify opportunities for optimization.

    Phase 3

    Integrate the New Optimized Processes into Practice

    Phase 3 outline

    Call 1-888-670-8889 or email GuidedImplementations@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Complete these steps on your own, or call us to complete a guided implementation. A guided implementation is a series of 2-3 advisory calls that help you execute each phase of a project. They are included in most advisory memberships.

    Guided Implementation 3: Integrate the New Optimized Processes into Practice

    Proposed Time to Completion: 6-12 weeks

    Step 3.1: Pilot your process to refine it prior to rollout

    Start with an analyst kick-off call:

    • Review the proposed intake, approval, and prioritization process

    Then complete these activities…

    • Select receptive stakeholders to work with
    • Define the scope of your pilot and determine logistics
    • Document lessons learned and create an action plan for any changes

    With these tools & templates:

    • Process Pilot Plan
    • Project Backlog Manager Job Description

    Step 3.2: Analyze the impact of organizational change

    Review findings with analyst:

    • Results of the process pilot and the finalized intake SOP
    • Key PPM stakeholders
    • Current organizational climate

    Then complete these activities…

    • Analyze the stakeholder impact and responses to impending organizational change
    • Create message canvases for at-risk change impacts and stakeholders to create an effective communication plan

    With these tools & templates:

    • Intake Process Implementation Impact Analysis Tool

    Phase 3 Results & Insights:

    • Engagement paves the way for smoother adoption. An “engagement” approach (rather than simply “communication”) turns stakeholders into advocates who can help boost your message, sustain the change, and realize benefits without constant intervention or process command-and-control.

    Step 3.1: Pilot your intake, approval, and prioritization process to refine it before rollout

    PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3

    1.1

    Define project valuation criteria

    1.2

    Envision process target state

    2.1

    Streamline intake

    2.2

    Right-size approval steps

    2.3

    Prioritize projects to fit resource capacity

    3.1

    Pilot your optimized process

    3.2

    Communicate organizational change

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Select receptive managers to work with during your pilot
    • Define the scope of your pilot and determine logistics
    • Plan to obtain feedback, document lessons learned, and create an action plan for any changes
    • Finalize Project Intake, Approval, and Prioritization SOP

    This step involves the following participants:

    • PMO Director / Portfolio Manager
    • Project Managers
    • Business Analysts

    Outcomes of this step

    • A pilot team
    • A process pilot plan that defines the scope, logistics, and process for retrospection
    • Project Backlog Manager job description
    • Finalized Project Intake, Approval, and Prioritization SOP for rollout

    Pilot your new processes to test feasibility and address issues before a full deployment

    Adopting the right set of practices requires a significant degree of change that necessitates buy-in from varied stakeholders throughout IT and the business.

    Rome wasn’t built in a day. Similarly, benefits of optimized project intake, approval, and prioritization process will not be realized overnight.

    Resist the urge to deploy a big-bang roll out of your new intake practices. The approach is ill advised for two main reasons:

    • It will put more of a strain on the implementation team in the near term, with a larger pool of end users to train and collect data from.
    • Putting untested practices in a department-wide spotlight could lead to mass confusion in the near-term and color the new processes in a negative light, leading to a loss of stakeholder trust and engagement right out-of-the-gate.

    Start with a pilot phase. Identify receptive lines of business and IT resources to work with, and leverage their insights to help iron out the kinks in your process before unveiling your practices to IT and all business users at large.

    This step will help you to:

    • Plan and execute a pilot of the processes we developed in Phase 2.
    • Incorporate the lessons learned from that pilot to strengthen your SOP and ease the communication process.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Engagement paves the way for smoother adoption. An “engagement” approach (rather than simply “communication”) turns stakeholders into advocates who can help boost your message, sustain the change, and realize benefits without constant intervention or process command-and-control.

    Plan your pilot like you would any project to ensure it’s well defined and its goals are clearly articulated

    Use Info-Tech’s Intake Process Pilot Plan Template to help define the scope of your pilot and set appropriate goals for the test-run of your new processes.

    A process pilot is a limited scope of an implementation (constrained by time and resources involved) in order to test the viability and effectiveness of the process as it has been designed.

    • Investing time and energy into a pilot phase can help to lower implementation risk, enhance the details and steps within a process, and improve stakeholder relations prior to a full scale rollout.
    • More than a dry run, however, a pilot should be approached strategically, and planned out to limit the scope of it and achieve specific outcomes.
    • Leverage a planning document to ensure your process pilot is grounded in a common set of definitions, that the pilot is delivering value and insight, and that ultimately the pilot can serve as a starting point for a full-scale process implementation.

    Download Info-Tech’s Process Pilot Plan Template

    A screenshot of Info-Tech's Process Pilot Plan Template is shown.

    "The advantages to a pilot are several. First, risk is constrained. Pilots are closely monitored so if a problem does occur, it can be fixed immediately. Second, the people working in the pilot can become trainers as you roll the process out to the rest of the organization. Third, the pilot is another opportunity for skeptics to visit the pilot process and learn from those working in it. There’s nothing like seeing a new process working for people to change their minds."

    Daniel Madison

    Select receptive stakeholders to work with during your pilot

    3.1.1 Estimated Time: 20-60 minutes

    Info-Tech recommends selecting PPM stakeholders who are aware of your role and some of the challenges in project intake, approval, and prioritization to assist in the implementation process.

    1. If receptive PPM stakeholders are known, schedule a 15-minute meeting with them to inquire if they would be willing to be part of the pilot process.
    2. If receptive project managers are not known, use Info-Tech’s Stakeholder Engagement Workbook to conduct a formal selection process.
      1. Enter a list of potential participants for pilot in tab 3.
      2. Rate project managers in terms of influence, pilot interest, and potential deployment contribution within tab 4.
      3. Review tab 5 in the workbook. Receptive PPM stakeholders will appear in the top quadrants. Ideal PPM stakeholders for the pilot are located in the top right quadrant of the graph.

    A screenshot of Info-Tech's Stakeholder Engagement Workbook Tab 5 is shown.

    INPUT

    • Project portfolio management stakeholders (Activity 1.2.3)

    OUTPUT

    • Pilot project team

    Materials

    • Stakeholder Engagement Workbook
    • Process Pilot Plan Template

    Participants

    • PMO Director/ Portfolio Manager
    • CIO (optional)

    Document the PPM stakeholders involved in your pilot in Section 3 of Info-Tech’s Process Pilot Plan Template.

    Define the scope of your pilot and determine logistics

    3.1.2 Estimated Time: 60-90 minutes

    Use Info-Tech’s Process Pilot Plan Template to design the details of your pilot.

    Investing time into planning your pilot phase strategically will ensure a clear scope, better communications for those piloting the processes, and – overall – better, more actionable results for the pilot phase. The Pilot Plan Template is broken into five sections to assist in these goals:

    • Pilot Overview and Scope
    • Success and Risk Factors
    • Stakeholders Involved and Communications Plan
    • Pilot Retrospective and Feedback Protocol

    The duration of your pilot should go at least one prioritization period, e.g. one to two quarters.

    Estimates of time commitments should be captured for each stakeholder. During the retrospective at the end of the pilot you should capture actuals to help determine the time-cost of the process itself and measure its sustainability.

    Once the Plan Template is completed, schedule time to share and communicate it with the pilot team and executive sponsors of the process.

    While you should invest time in this planning document, continue to lean on the Intake, Approval, and Prioritization SOP throughout the pilot phase.

    INPUT

    • Sections 1 through 4 of the Process Pilot Plan Template

    OUTPUT

    • A process pilot plan

    Materials

    • Process Pilot Plan Template

    Participants

    • PMO Director / Portfolio Manager
    • Project Managers
    • Business Analysts
    • CIO (optional)

    Execute your pilot and prepare to make process revisions before the full rollout

    Hit play! Begin the process pilot and get familiar with the work routine and resource management solution.

    Some things to keep in mind during the pilot include:

    • Depending on the solution you are using, you will likely need to spend one day or less to populate the tool. During the pilot, measure the time and effort required to manage the data within the tool. Determine whether time and effort required is viable on an ongoing basis (i.e. can you do it every month or quarter) and has value.
    • Meet with the pilot team and other stakeholders regularly during the pilot, at least biweekly. Allow the team (and yourself) to speak honestly and openly about what isn’t working. The pilot is your chance to make things better.
    • Keep notes about what will need to change in the SOP. For major changes, you may have to tweak the process during the pilot itself. Update the process documents as needed and communicate the changes and why they’re being made. If required, update the scope of the pilot in the Pilot Plan Template.
    An example is shown on how to begin the process pilot and getting familiar with the work routine and resource management solution.

    Obtain feedback from the pilot group to improve your processes before a wider rollout

    3.1.3 Estimated Time: 30 minutes

    Pilot projects allow you to validate your assumptions and leverage lessons learned. During the planning of the pilot, you should have scheduled a retrospective meeting with the pilot team to formally assess strengths and weaknesses in the process you have drafted.

    • Schedule the retrospective shortly after the pilot is completed. Info-Tech recommends performing a Stop/Start/Continue meeting with pilot participants to obtain and capture feedback.
    • Have members of the meeting record any processes/activities on sticky notes that should:
      • Stop: because they are ineffective or not useful
      • Start: because they would be useful for the tool and have not been incorporated into current processes
      • Continue: because they are useful and positively contribute to intended process outcomes.

    An example of how to structure a Stop/Start/Continue activity on a whiteboard using sticky notes.

    An example of stop, start, and continue is activity is shown.

    INPUT

    • What’s working and what isn’t in the process

    OUTPUT

    • Ideas to improve process

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Sticky notes
    • Process Pilot Plan Template

    Participants

    • Process owner (PMO director or portfolio owner)
    • Pilot team

    See the following slide for additional instructions.

    Document lessons learned and create an action plan for any changes to the processes

    3.1.4 Estimated Time: 30 minutes

    An example of stop, start, and continue is activity is shown.

    As a group, discuss everyone’s responses and organize according to top priority (mark with a 1) and lower priority/next steps (mark with a 2). At this point, you can also remove any sticky notes that are repetitive or no longer relevant.

    Once you have organized based on priority, be sure to come to a consensus with the group regarding which actions to take. For example, if the group agrees that they should “stop holding meetings weekly,” come to a consensus regarding how often meetings will be held, i.e. monthly.

    Priority Action Required Who is Responsible Implementation Date
    Stop: Holding meetings weekly Hold meetings monthly Jane Doe, PMO Next Meeting: August 1, 2017
    Start: Discussing backlog during meetings Ensure that backlog data is up to date for discussion on date of next meeting. John Doe, Portfolio Manager August 1, 2017

    Create an action plan for the top priority items that require changes (the Stops and Starts). Record in this slide, or your preferred medium. Be sure to include who is responsible for the action and the date that it will be implemented.

    Document the outcomes of the start/stop/continue and your action plan in Section 6 of Info-Tech’s Process Pilot Plan Template.

    Use Info-Tech’s Backlog Manager Job Description Template to help fill any staffing needs around data maintenance

    3.1 Project Backlog Manager Job Description

    You will need to determine responsibilities and accountabilities for portfolio management functions within your team.

    If you do not have a clearly identifiable portfolio manager at this time, you will need to clarify who will wear which hats in terms of facilitating intake and prioritization, high-level capacity awareness, and portfolio reporting.

    • Use Info-Tech’s Project Backlog Manager job description template to help clarify some of the required responsibilities to support your intake, approval, and prioritization strategy.
      • If you need to bring in an additional staff member to help support the strategy, you can customize the job description template to help advertise the position. Simply edit the text in grey within the template.
    • If you have other PPM tasks that you need to define responsibilities for, you can use the RASCI chart on the final tab of the PPM Strategy Development Tool.

    Download Info-Tech’s Project Backlog Manager job description template.

    A screenshot of Info-Tech's Project Backlog Manager template is shown.

    Finalize the Intake, Approval, and Prioritization SOP and prepare to communicate your processes

    Once you’ve completed the pilot process and made the necessary tweaks, you should finalize your Intake, Approval, and Prioritization SOP and prepare to communicate it.

    Update section 1.2, “Overall Process Workflow” in Info-Tech’s Project Intake, Approval, and Prioritization SOP Template with the new process flow.

    Revisit your SOP from Phase 2 and ensure it has been updated to reflect the process changes that were identified in activity 3.1.4.

    • If during the pilot process the data was too difficult or time consuming to maintain, revisit the dimensions you have chosen and choose dimensions that are easier to accurately maintain. Tweak your process steps in the SOP accordingly.
    • In the long term, if you are not observing any progress toward achieving your success criteria, revisit the impact analysis that we’ll prepare in step 3.2 and address some of these inhibitors to organizational change.

    Download Info-Tech’s Project Intake, Approval, and Prioritization SOP template.

    A screenshot of Info-Tech's Project Intake, Approval, and Prioritization SOP template.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Make your SOP high impact. SOPs are often at risk of being left unmaintained and languishing in disuse. Improve the SOP’s succinctness and usability by making it visual; consult Info-Tech’s blueprint, Create Visual SOP Documents that Drive Process Optimization, Not Just Peace of Mind.

    Step 3.2: Analyze the impact of organizational change through the eyes of PPM stakeholders to gain their buy-in

    PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3

    1.1

    Define project valuation criteria

    1.2

    Envision process target state

    2.1

    Streamline intake

    2.2

    Right-size approval steps

    2.3

    Prioritize projects to fit resource capacity

    3.1

    Pilot your optimized process

    3.2

    Communicate organizational change

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Analyze the stakeholder impact and responses to impending organizational change
    • Create message canvases for at-risk change impacts and stakeholders
    • Set the course of action for communicating changes to your stakeholders

    This step involves the following participants:

    • PMO Director / Portfolio Manager
    • Project Managers
    • Business Analysts

    Outcomes of this step

    • A thorough organizational change impact analysis, based on Info-Tech’s expertise in organizational change management
    • Message canvases and communication plan for your stakeholders
    • Go-live for the new intake, approval, and prioritization process

    Manage key PPM stakeholders and communicate changes

    • Business units: Projects are undertaken to provide value to the business. Senior management from business units must help define how project will be valued.
    • IT: IT must ensure that technical/practical considerations are taken into account when determining project value.
    • Finance: The CFO or designated representative will ensure that estimated project costs and benefits can be used to manage the budget.
    • PMO: PMO is the administrator of the project portfolio. PMO must provide coordination and support to ensure the process operates smoothly and its goals are realized.
    • Business analysts: BAs carry out the evaluation of project value. Therefore, their understanding of the evaluation criteria and the process as a whole are critical to the success of the process.
    • Project sponsors: Project sponsors are accountable for the realization of benefits for which projects are undertaken.

    Impacts will be felt differently by different stakeholders and stakeholder groups

    As you assess change impacts, keep in mind that no impact will be felt the same across the organization. Depth of impact can vary depending on the frequency (will the impact be felt daily, weekly, monthly?), the actions necessitated by it (e.g. will it change the way the job is done or is it simply a minor process tweak?), and the anticipated response of the stakeholder (support, resistance, indifference?).

    Use the Organizational Change Depth Scale below to help visualize various depths of impact. The deeper the impact, the tougher the job of managing change will be.

    Procedural Behavioral Interpersonal Vocational Cultural
    Procedural change involves changes to explicit procedures, rules, policies, processes, etc. Behavioral change is similar to procedural change, but goes deeper to involve the changing tacit or unconscious habits. Interpersonal change goes beyond behavioral change to involve changing relationships, teams, locations, reporting structures, and other social interactions. Vocational change requires acquiring new knowledge and skills, and accepting the loss or decline in the value or relevance of previously acquired knowledge and skills. Cultural change goes beyond interpersonal and vocational change to involve changing personal values, social norms, and assumptions about the meaning of good vs. bad or right vs. wrong.
    Example: providing sales reps with mobile access to the CRM application to let them update records from the field. Example: requiring sales reps to use tablets equipped with a custom mobile application for placing orders from the field. Example: migrating sales reps to work 100% remotely. Example: migrating technical support staff to field service and sales support roles. Example: changing the operating model to a more service-based value proposition or focus.

    Perform a change impact analysis to maximize the chances of adoption for the new intake process

    Invest time and effort to analyze the impact of change to create an actionable stakeholder communication plan that yields the desirable result: adoption.

    Info-Tech’s Drive Organizational Change from the PMO blueprint offers the OCM Impact Analysis Tool to helps document the change impact across multiple dimensions, enabling the project team to review the analysis with others to ensure that the most important impacts are captured.

    This tool has been customized for optimizing project intake, approval, and prioritization process to deliver the same result in a more streamlined way. The next several slides will take you through the activities to ultimately create an OCM message canvas and a communication plan for your key stakeholders.

    Download Info-Tech’s Intake and Prioritization Impact Analysis Tool.

    A screenshot of Info-Tech's Intake and Prioritization Impact Analysis Tool is shown.

    "As a general principle, project teams should always treat every stakeholder initially as a recipient of change. Every stakeholder management plan should have, as an end goal, to change recipients’ habits or behaviors."

    -PMI, 2015

    Set up the Intake Process and Prioritization Impact Analysis Tool

    3.2.1 Intake and Prioritization Impact Analysis Tool, Tab 2-3

    In Tab 2, enter your stakeholders’ names. Represent stakeholders as a group if you expect the impact of change on them to be reasonably uniform, as well as their anticipated responses. Otherwise, consider adding them as individuals or subgroups.

    A screenshot of Info-Tech's Intake and Prioritization Impact Analysis Tool, Tab 2 is shown.

    In Tab 3, enter whether you agree or disagree with each statement that represents an element of organizational change that be introduced as the newly optimized intake process is implemented.

    As a result of the change initiative in question:

    A screenshot of Info-Tech's Intake and Prioritization Impact Analysis Tool, Tab 3 is shown.

    Analyze the impact and the anticipated stakeholder responses of each change

    3.2.1 Intake and Prioritization Impact Analysis Tool, Tab 4: Impact Analysis Inputs

    Each change statement that you agreed with in Tab 3 are listed here in Tab 4 of the Intake and Prioritization Impact Analysis Tool. For each stakeholder, estimate and enter the following data:

    1. Frequency of the Impact: how often will the impact of the change be felt?
    2. Effort Associated with Impact: what is the demand on a stakeholder’s effort to implement the change?
    3. Anticipated Response: rate from enthusiastic response to active subversion. Honest and realistic estimates of anticipated responses are critical to the rest of the impact analysis.
    A screenshot of Info-Tech's Intake and Prioritization Impact Analysis Tool, Tab 4 is shown.

    Analyze the stakeholder impact and responses to impending organizational change as a group

    3.2.1 Estimated Time: 60-90 minutes

    Divide and conquer. Leverage the group to get through the seemingly daunting amount of work involved with impact analysis.

    1. Divide the activity participants into subgroups and assign a section of the impact analysis. It may be helpful to do one section together as a group to make sure everyone is roughly on the same page for assessing impact.
    2. Suggested ways to divide up the impact analysis include:

    • By change impact. This would be suitable when the process owners (or would-be process owners) are available and participating.
    • By stakeholders. This would be suitable for large organizations where the activity participants know some stakeholders better than others.

    Tip: use a spreadsheet tool that supports multi-user editing (e.g. Google Sheets, Excel Online).

  • Aggregate the completed work and benchmark one another’s analysis by reviewing them with the entire group.
  • INPUT

    • Organizational and stakeholder knowledge
    • Optimized intake process

    OUTPUT

    • Estimates of stakeholder-specific impact and response

    Materials

    • Intake and Prioritization Impact Analysis Tool

    Participants

    • PMO Director/ Portfolio Manager
    • Project Managers
    • Business Analysts

    Info-Tech Insight

    Beware of bias. Groups are just as susceptible to producing overly optimistic or pessimistic analysis as individuals, just in different ways. Unrealistic change impact analysis will compromise your chances of arriving at a reasonable, tactful stakeholder communication plan.

    Examine your impact analysis report

    3.2.2 Intake and Prioritization Impact Analysis Tool, Tab 5: Impact Analysis Outputs

    These outputs are based on the impacts you analyzed in Tab 4 of the tool (Activity 3.2.1). They are organized in seven sections:

    1. Top Five Highest Risk Impacts, based on the frequency and effort inputs across all impacts.
    2. Overall Process Adoption Rating (top right), showing the overall difficulty of this change given likelihood/risk that the stakeholders involved will absorb the anticipated change impacts.
    3. Top Five Most Impacted Stakeholders, based on the frequency and effort inputs across all impacts.
    4. Top Five Process Supporters and;
    5. Top Five Process Resistors, based on the anticipated response inputs across all impacts.
    6. Impact Register (bottom right): this list breaks down each change’s likelihood of adoption.
    7. Potential Impacts to Watch Out For: this list compiles all of the "Don't Know" responses from Tab 3.
    A screenshot of Info-Tech's Intake and Prioritization Impact Analysis Tool, Tab 5 is shown. It shows Section 2. Overall process adoption rating. A screenshot of Info-Tech's Intake and Prioritization Impact Analysis Tool, Tab 5 is shown. It shows Section 6. Impact Register.

    Tailor messages for at-risk change impacts and stakeholders with Info-Tech’s Message Canvas

    3.2.2 Intake and Prioritization Impact Analysis Tool, Tab 6: Message Canvas

    Use Info-Tech’s Message Canvas on this tab to help rationalize and elaborate the change vision for each group.

    Elements of a Message Canvas

    • Why is there a need for this process change?
    • What will be new for this audience?
    • What will go away for this audience?
    • What will be meaningfully unchanged for this audience?
    • How will this change benefit this audience?
    • When and how will the benefits be realized for this audience?
    • What does this audience have to do for this change to succeed?
    • What does this audience have to stop doing for this change to succeed?
    • What should this audience continue doing?
    • What support will this audience receive to help manage the transition?
    • What should this audience expect to do/happen next?

    A screenshot of Info-Tech's Intake and Prioritization Impact Analysis Tool, Tab 6 is shown.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Change thy language, change thyself.

    Jargon, acronyms, and technical terms represent deeply entrenched cultural habits and assumptions.

    Continuing to use jargon or acronyms after a transition tends to drag people back to old ways of thinking and working.

    You don’t need to invent a new batch of buzzwords for every change (nor should you), but every change is an opportunity to listen for words and phrases that have lost their meaning through overuse and abuse.

    Create message canvases for at-risk change impacts and stakeholders as a group

    3.2.2 Estimated Time: 90-120 minutes

    1. Decide on the number of message canvases to complete. This will be based on the number of at-risk change impacts and stakeholders.
    2. Divide the activity participants into subgroups and assign a section of the message canvas. It may be helpful to do one section together as a group to make sure everyone is roughly on the same page for assessing impact.
    3. Aggregate the completed work and benchmark the message canvases amongst subgroups.

    Remember these guidelines to help your messages resonate:

    • People are busy and easily distracted. Tell people what they really need to know first, before you lose their attention.
    • Repetition is good. Remember the Aristotelian triptych: “Tell them what you’re going to tell them, then tell them, then tell them what you told them.”
    • Don’t use technical terms, jargon, or acronyms. Different groups in organizations tend to develop specialized vocabularies. Everybody grows so accustomed to using acronyms and jargon every day that it becomes difficult to notice how strange it sounds to outsiders. This is especially important when IT communicates with non-technical audiences. Don’t alienate your audience by talking at them in a strange language.
    • Test your message. Run focus groups or deliver communications to a test audience (which could be as simple as asking 2–3 people to read a draft) before delivering messages more broadly.

    – Info-Tech Blueprint, Drive Organizational Change from the PMO

    INPUT

    • Impact Analysis Outputs
    • Organizational and stakeholder knowledge

    OUTPUT

    • Estimates of stakeholder-specific impact and response

    Materials

    • Intake and Prioritization Impact Analysis Tool

    Participants

    • PMO Director/ Portfolio Manager
    • Project Managers
    • Business Analysts

    Distill the message canvases into a comprehensive communication plan

    3.2.3 Intake and Prioritization Impact Analysis Tool, Tab 7: Communication Plan

    The communication plan creates an action plan around the message canvases to coordinate the responsibilities of delivering them, so the risks of “dropping the ball” on your stakeholders are minimized.

    A screenshot of Info-Tech's Intake and Prioritization Impact Analysis Tool, Tab 7: Communication is shown.

    1. Choose a change impact from a drop-down menu.

    2. Choose an intended audience...

    … and the message canvas to reference.

    3. Choose the method of delivery. It will influence how to craft the message for the stakeholder.

    4. Indicate who is responsible for creating and communicating the message.

    A screenshot of Info-Tech's Intake and Prioritization Impact Analysis Tool, Tab 7: Communication is shown.

    5. Briefly indicate goal of the communication and the likelihood of success.

    6. Record the dates to plan and track the communications that take place.

    Set the course of action for communicating changes to your stakeholders

    3.2.2 Estimated Time: 90-120 minutes

    1. Divide the activity participants into subgroups and assign communication topics to each group. There should be one communication topic for each change impact. Based on the message canvas, create a communication plan draft.
    2. Aggregate the completed work and benchmark the communication topic amongst subgroups.
    3. Share the finished communication plan with the rest of the working group. Do not share this file widely, but keep it private within the group.

    Identify critical points in the change curve:

    1. Honeymoon of “Uninformed Optimism”: There is usually tentative support and even enthusiasm for change before people have really felt or understood what it involves.
    2. Backlash of “Informed Pessimism” (leading to “Valley of Despair”): As change approaches or begins, people realize they’ve overestimated the benefits (or the speed at which benefits will be achieved) and underestimated the difficulty of change.
    3. Valley of Despair and beginning of “Hopeful Realism”: Eventually, sentiment bottoms out and people begin to accept the difficulty (or inevitability) of change.
    4. Bounce of “Informed Optimism”: People become more optimistic and supportive when they begin to see bright spots and early successes.
    5. Contentment of “Completion”: Change has been successfully adopted and benefits are being realized.

    Based on Don Kelley and Daryl Conner’s Emotional Cycle of Change.

    INPUT

    • Change impact analysis results
    • Message canvases
    • List of stakeholders

    OUTPUT

    • Communication Plan

    Materials

    • Intake and Prioritization Impact Analysis Tool

    Participants

    • PMO Director/ Portfolio Manager
    • Project Managers
    • Business Analysts

    Roll out the optimized intake, approval, and prioritization process, and continually monitor adoption and success

    As you implement your new project intake process, familiarize yourself with common barriers and challenges.

    There will be challenges to watch for in evaluating the effectiveness of your intake processes. These may include circumvention of process by key stakeholders, re-emergence of off-the-grid projects and low-value initiatives.

    As a quick and easy way to periodically assess your processes, consider the following questions:

    • Are you confident that all work in progress is being tracked via the project list?
    • Are your resources all currently working on high-value initiatives?
    • Since optimizing, have you been able to deliver (or are you on target to deliver) all that has been approved, with no initiatives in states of suspended animation for long periods of time?
    • Thanks to sufficient portfolio visibility and transparency into your capacity, have you been able to successfully decline requests that did not add value or that did not align with resourcing?

    If you answer “no” to any of these questions after a sufficient post-implementation period (approximately six to nine months, depending on the scope of your optimizing), you may need to tweak certain aspects of your processes or seek to align your optimization with a lower capability level in the short term.

    Small IT department struggles to optimize intake and to communicate new processes to stakeholders

    CASE STUDY

    Industry: Government

    Source: Info-Tech Client

    Challenge

    There is an IT department for a large municipal government. Possessing a relatively low level of PPM maturity, IT is in the process of establishing more formal intake practices in order to better track, and respond to, project requests. New processes include a minimalist request form (sent via email) coupled with more thorough follow-up from BAs and PMs to determine business value, ROI, and timeframes.

    Solution

    Even with new user-friendly processes in place, IT struggles to get stakeholders to adopt, especially with smaller initiatives. These smaller requests frequently continue to come in outside of the formal process and, because of this, are often executed outside of portfolio oversight. Without good, reliable data around where staff time is spent, IT lacks the authority to decline new requests.

    Results

    IT is seeking further optimization through better communication. They are enforcing discipline on stakeholders and reiterating that all initiatives, regardless of size, need to be directed through the process. IT is also training its staff to be more critical. “Don’t just start working on an initiative because a stakeholder asks.” With staff being more critical and directing requests through the proper queues, IT is getting better at tracking and prioritizing requests.

    "The biggest challenge when implementing the intake process was change management. We needed to shift our focus from responding to requests to strategically thinking about how requests should be managed. The intake process allows the IT Department to be transparent to customers and enables decision makers."

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    A picture of an Info-Tech analyst is shown.

    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech’s historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    3.1.1

    A screenshot of activity 3.1.1 is shown

    Select receptive stakeholders to work with during your pilot

    Identify the right team of supportive PPM stakeholders to carry out the process pilot. Strategies to recruit the right people outside the workshop will be discussed if appropriate.

    3.2.1

    A screenshot of activity 3.2.1 is shown.

    Analyze the stakeholder impact and responses to impending organizational change

    Carry out a thorough analysis of change impact in order to maximize the effectiveness of the communication strategy in support of the implementation of the optimized process.

    Insight breakdown

    Insight 1

    • The overarching goal of optimizing project intake, approval, and prioritization process is to maximize the throughput of the best projects. To achieve this goal, one must have a clear way to determine what are “the best” projects.

    Insight 2

    • Info-Tech’s methodology systemically fits the project portfolio into its triple constraint of stakeholder needs, strategic objectives, and resource capacity to effectively address the challenges of establishing organizational discipline for project intake.

    Insight 3

    • Engagement paves the way for smoother adoption. An “engagement” approach (rather than simply “communication”) turns stakeholders into advocates who can help boost your message, sustain the change, and realize benefits without constant intervention or process command-and-control.

    Summary of accomplishment

    Knowledge Gained

    • Triple constraint model of project portfolio: stakeholder needs, strategic objectives, and resource capacity
    • Benefits of optimizing project intake, approval, and prioritization for managing a well-behaved project portfolio
    • Challenges of installing well-run project intake
    • Importance of piloting the process and communicating impacts to stakeholders

    Processes Optimized

    • Project valuation process: scorecard, weights
    • Project intake process: reception, triaging, follow-up
    • Project approval process: steps, accountabilities, deliverables
    • Project prioritization process: estimation of resource capacity for projects, project demand
    • Communication for organizational change

    Deliverables Completed

    • Optimized Project Intake, Approval, and Prioritization Process
    • Documentation of the optimized process in the form of a Standard Operating Procedure
    • Project valuation criteria, developed with Project Value Scorecard Development Tool and implemented through the Project Intake and Prioritization Tool
    • Standardized project request form with right-sized procedural friction
    • Standard for project level classification, implemented through the Project Intake Classification Matrix
    • Toolbox of deliverables for capturing information developed to inform decision makers for approval: Benefits Commitment Form, Technology Assessment Tool, Business Case Templates
    • Process pilot plan
    • Communication plan for organizational change, driven by a thorough analysis of change impacts on key stakeholders using the Intake and Prioritization Impact Analysis Tool

    Research contributors and experts

    Picture of Kiron D. Bondale

    Kiron D. Bondale, PMP, PMI - RMP

    Senior Project Portfolio & Change Management Professional

    A placeholder photo is shown here.

    Scot Ganshert, Portfolio Group Manager

    Larimer County, CO

    Picture of Garrett McDaniel

    Garrett McDaniel, Business Analyst II – Information Technology

    City of Boulder, CO

    A placeholder photo is shown here.

    Joanne Pandya, IT Project Manager

    New York Property Insurance Underwriters

    Picture of Jim Tom.

    Jim Tom, CIO

    Public Health Ontario

    Related Info-Tech research

    A screenshot of Info-Tech's Develop a Project Portfolio Management Strategy blueprint

    Develop a Project Portfolio Management Strategy blueprint"

    A screenshot of Info-Tech's Grow Your Own PPM Solution blueprint is shown.

    Grow Your Own PPM Solution

    A screenshot of Info-Tech's Balance Supply and Demand with Realistic Resource Management Practices blueprint is shown.

    Balance Supply and Demand with Realistic Resource Management Practices

    A screenshot of Info-Tech's Maintain an Organized Portfolio blueprint is shown.

    Maintain an Organized Portfolio

    A screenshot of Info-Tech's Manage a Minimum Viable PMO blueprint is shown.

    Manage a Minimum Viable PMO

    A screenshot of Info-Tech's Establish the Benefits Realization Process blueprint is shown.

    Establish the Benefits Realization Process

    A screenshot of Info-Tech's Manage an Agile Portfolio blueprint is shown.

    Manage an Agile Portfolio

    A screenshot of Info-Tech's Tailor Project Management Processes to Fit Your Projects blueprint is shown.

    Tailor Project Management Processes to Fit Your Projects

    A screenshot of Info-Tech's Project Portfolio Management Diagnostic Program blueprint is shown.

    Project Portfolio Management Diagnostic Program

    The Project Portfolio Management Diagnostic Program is a low-effort, high-impact program designed to help project owners assess and improve their PPM practices. Gather and report on all aspects of your PPM environment to understand where you stand and how you can improve.

    Bibliography

    Boston Consulting Group. “Executive Sponsor Engagement: Top Driver of Project and Program Success.” PMI, 2014. Web.

    Boston Consulting Group. “Winning Through Project Portfolio Management: the Practitioners’ Perspective.” PMI, 2015. Web.

    Bradberry, Travis. “Why The 8-Hour workday Doesn’t Work.” Forbes, 7 Jun 2016. Web.

    Cook, Scott. Playbook: Best Practices. Business Week

    Cooper, Robert, G. “Effective Gating: Make product innovation more productive by using gates with teeth.” Stage-Gate International and Product Development Institute. March/April 2009. Web.

    Epstein, Dan. “Project Initiation Process: Part Two.” PM World Journal. Vol. IV, Issue III. March 2015. Web.

    Evans, Lisa. “The Exact Amount of Time You Should Work Every Day.” Fast Company, 15 Sep. 2014. Web.

    Madison, Daniel. “The Five Implementation Options to Manage the Risk in a New Process.” BPMInstitute.org. n.d. Web.

    Merkhofer, Lee. “Improve the Prioritization Process.” Priority Systems, n.d. Web.

    Miller, David, and Mike Oliver. “Engaging Stakeholder for Project Success.” PMI, 2015. Web.

    Mind Tools. “Kelley and Conner’s Emotional Cycle of Change.” Mind Tools, n.d. Web.

    Mochal, Jeffrey and Thomas Mochal. Lessons in Project Management. Appress: September 2011. Page 6.

    Newcomer, Eric. “Getting Decisions to Stick.” Standish Group PM2go, 20 Oct 2017. Web.

    “PMI Today.” Newtown Square, PA: PMI, Oct 2017. Web.

    Project Management Institute. “Standard for Portfolio Management, 3rd ed.” Newtown Square, PA: PMI, 2013.

    Project Management Institute. “Pulse of the Profession 2017: Success Rates Rise.” PMI, 2017. Web.

    Transparent Choice. “Criteria for Project Prioritization.” n.p., n.d. Web.

    University of New Hampshire (UNH) Project Management Office. “University of New Hampshire IT Intake and Selection Process Map.” UNH, n.d. Web.

    Ward, John. “Delivering Value from Information Systems and Technology Investments: Learning from Success.” Information Systems Research Centre. August 2006. Web.

    Integrate Portfolios to Create Exceptional Customer Value

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}176|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Architecture & Strategy
    • Parent Category Link: /architecture-and-strategy
    • Through growth, both organic and acquisition, you have a significant footprint of projects and applications.
    • Projects and applications have little in common with one another, all with their own history and pedigree.
    • You need to look across your portfolio of applications and projects to see if they will collectively help the organization achieve its goals.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Stakeholders don’t care about the minutia and activities involved in project and application portfolio management.
    • Timely delivery of effective and important applications that deliver value throughout their life are the most important factors driving business satisfaction with IT.

    Impact and Result

    • Define an organizing principle that will structure your projects and applications in a way that matters to your stakeholders.
    • Bridge application and project portfolio data using the organizing principle that matters to communicate with stakeholders across the organization.
    • Create a dashboard that brings together the benefits of both project and application portfolio management to improve visibility and decision making.

    Integrate Portfolios to Create Exceptional Customer Value Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should integrate your application and project portfolios, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the three ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Define the principle that organizes your portfolios, objectives, and stakeholders

    To bring your portfolios together, you need to start with learning about your objectives, principles, and stakeholders.

    • Integrate Portfolios to Create Exceptional Customer Value – Phase 1: Define the Principle That Organizes Your Portfolios, Objectives, and Stakeholders
    • Integrated Portfolio Dashboard Tool
    • Integrated Portfolio Dashboard Tool – Example

    2. Take stock of what brings you closer to your goals

    Get a deeper understanding of what makes up your organizing principle before learning about your applications and projects that are aligned with your principles.

    • Integrate Portfolios to Create Exceptional Customer Value – Phase 2: Take Stock of What Brings You Closer to Your Goals

    3. Bring it all together

    Bound by your organizing principles, bring your projects and applications together under a single dashboard. Once defined, determine the rollout and communication plan that suits your organization.

    • Integrate Portfolios to Create Exceptional Customer Value – Phase 3: Bring It All Together
    • Integrated Portfolio Communication and Roadmap Plan
    • Integrated Portfolio Communication and Roadmap Plan Example
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Integrate Portfolios to Create Exceptional Customer Value

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Looking at Your Principles

    The Purpose

    Determine your organizational objectives and organizing principle.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A clear understanding of where you need to go as an organization.

    A clear way to enable all parts of your portfolio to come together.

    Activities

    1.1 Determine your organization’s objectives.

    1.2 Determine your key stakeholders.

    1.3 Define your organizing principle.

    1.4 Decompose your organizing principle into its core components.

    Outputs

    Determined organizing principle for your applications and projects

    2 Understanding Your Applications

    The Purpose

    Get a clear view of the applications that contribute to your organization’s objectives.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A key element of IT value delivery is its applications. Gaining awareness allows you to evaluate if the right value is being provided.

    Activities

    2.1 Determine your complete list of applications.

    2.2 Determine the health of your applications.

    2.3 Link your applications to the organization’s core components.

    Outputs

    List of applications

    Application list with health statistics filled in

    List of applications with health metrics bound to the organization’s core components

    3 Understanding Your Projects

    The Purpose

    Get a clear view of your project portfolio and how it relates to your applications and their organizing principle.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    An understanding of your project portfolio.

    Activities

    3.1 List all in-flight projects and vital health statistics.

    3.2 Map out the key programs and projects in your portfolio to the application’s core components.

    Outputs

    List of projects

    List of projects mapped to applications they impact

    4 Rolling Out the New Dashboard

    The Purpose

    Bring together your application and project portfolios in a new, easy-to-use dashboard with a full rollout plan.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Dashboard available for use

    Roadmap and communication plan to make dashboard implementable and tangible

    Activities

    4.1 Test the dashboard.

    4.2 Define your refresh cadence.

    4.3 Plan your implementation.

    4.4 Develop your communication plan.

    Outputs

    Validated dashboards

    Maintain Employee Engagement During the COVID-19 Pandemic

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}548|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 10.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $12,399 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 5 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Engage
    • Parent Category Link: /engage
    • The uncertainty of the pandemic means that employee engagement is at higher risk.
    • Organizations need to think beyond targeting traditional audiences by considering engagement of onsite, remote, and laid-off employees.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • The changing way of work triggered by this pandemic means engagement efforts must be easy to implement and targeted for relevant audiences.

    Impact and Result

    • Identify key drivers to leverage during the pandemic to boost engagement as well as at-risk drivers to focus efforts on.
    • Select quick-win tactics to sustain and boost engagement for relevant target audiences.

    Maintain Employee Engagement During the COVID-19 Pandemic Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Determine the scope

    Evaluate the current state, stakeholder capacity, and target audience of engagement actions.

    • Maintain Employee Engagement During the COVID-19 Pandemic Storyboard
    • Pandemic Engagement Workbook

    2. Identify engagement drivers

    Review impact to engagement drivers in order to prioritize and select tactics for addressing each.

    • Tactics Catalog: Maintain Employee Engagement During the COVID-19 Pandemic
    • Employee Engagement During COVID-19: Manager Tactics

    3. Determine ownership and communicate engagement actions

    Designate owners of tactics, select measurement tools and cadence, and communicate engagement actions.

    • Crisis Communication Guide for HR
    • Crisis Communication Guide for Leaders
    • Leadership Crisis Communication Guide Template
    • HR Action and Communication Plan
    [infographic]

    Assess Infrastructure Readiness for Digital Transformation

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}300|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Strategy and Organizational Design
    • Parent Category Link: /strategy-and-organizational-design

    There are many challenges for I&O when it comes to digital transformation, including:

    • Legacy infrastructure technical debt
    • Skills and talent in the IT team
    • A culture that resists change
    • Fear of job loss

    These and many more will hinder your progress, which demonstrates the need to invest in modernizing your infrastructure, investing in training and hiring talent, and cultivating a culture that supports digital transformation.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    By using the framework of culture, competencies, collaboration and capabilities, organizations can create dimensions in their I&O structure in order to shift from traditional infrastructure management to becoming a strategic enabler, driving agility, innovation, and operational excellence though the effective integration of people, process, and technology.

    Impact and Result

    By driving a customer-centric approach, delivering a successful transformation can be tailored to the business goals and drive adoption and engagement. Refining your roadmap through data and analytics will drive this change. Use third-party expertise to guide your transformation and help build that vision of the future.

    Assess Infrastructure Readiness for Digital Transformation Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Assess Infrastructure Readiness for Digital Transformation – Unlock the full potential of your infrastructure with a digital transformation strategy and clear the barriers for success.

  • Be customer centric as opposed to being technology driven.
  • Understanding business needs and pain points is key to delivering solutions.
  • Approach infrastructure digital transformation in iterations and look at this as a journey.
    • Assess Infrastructure Readiness for Digital Transformation Storyboard
    • I&O Digital Transformation Maturity Assessment Tool

    Infographic

    Further reading

    Assess Infrastructure Readiness for Digital Transformation

    Unlock the full potential of your infrastructure with a digital transformation strategy and clear the barriers to success.

    Analyst Perspective

    It’s not just about the technology!

    Many businesses fail in their endeavors to complete a digital transformation, but the reasons are complex, and there are many ways to fail, whether it is people, process, or technology. In fact, according to many surveys, 70% of digital transformations fail, and it’s mainly down to strategy – or the lack thereof.

    A lot of organizations think of digital transformation as just an investment in technology, with no vision of what they are trying to achieve or transform. So, out of the gate, many organizations fail to undergo a meaningful transformation, change their business model, or bring about a culture of digital transformation needed to be seriously competitive in their given market.

    When it comes to I&O leaders who have been given a mandate to drive digital transformation projects, they still must align to the vision and mission of the organization; they must still train and hire staff that will be experts in their field; they must still drive process improvements and align the right technology to meet the needs of a digital transformation.

    John Donovan

    John Donovan

    Principal Research Director, I&O
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Insight summary

    Overarching insight

    Digital transformation requires I&O teams to shift from traditional infrastructure management to becoming a strategic enabler, driving agility, innovation, and operational excellence through effective integration of people, process, and technology.

    Insight 1

    Collaboration is a key component of I&O – Promote strong collaboration between I&O and other business functions. When doing a digital transformation, it is clear that this is a cross-functional effort. Business leaders and IT teams need to align their objectives, prioritize initiatives, and ensure that you are seamlessly integrating technologies with the new business functions.

    Insight 2

    Embrace agility and adaptability as core principles – As the digital landscape continues to evolve, it is paramount that I&O leaders are agile and adaptable to changing business needs, adopting new technology and implementing new innovative solutions. The culture of continuous improvement and openness to experimentation and learning will assist the I&O leaders in their journey.

    Insight 3

    Future-proof your infrastructure and operations – By anticipating emerging technologies and trends, you can proactively plan and organize your team for future needs. By investing in scalable, flexible infrastructure such as cloud services, automation, AI technologies, and continuously upskilling the IT staff, you can stay relevant and forward-looking in the digital space.

    Tactical insight

    An IT infrastructure maturity assessment is a foundational step in the journey of digital transformation. The demand will be on performance, resilience, and scalability. IT infrastructure must be able to support innovation and rapid deployment of services.

    Tactical insight

    Having a clear strategy, with leadership commitment along with hiring and training the right people, monitoring and measuring your progress, and ensuring it is a business-led journey will increase your chances of success.

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    There are a lot of challenges for I&O when it comes to digital transformation, including:

    • Legacy infrastructure technical debt.
    • Skills and talent in the IT team.
    • A culture that resists change.
    • Fear of job loss.

    These and many more will hinder your progress, which demonstrates the need to invest in modernizing your infrastructure, investing in training and hiring talent, and cultivating a culture that supports digital transformation.

    Common Obstacles

    Many obstacles to digital transformation begin with non-I&O activities, including:

    • Lack of a clear vision and strategy.
    • Siloed organizational structure.
    • Lack of governance and data management.
    • Limited budget and resources.

    By addressing these obstacles, I&O will have a better chance of a successful transformation and delivering the full potential of digital technologies.

    Info-Tech's Approach

    Building a culture of innovation by developing clear goals and creating a vision will be key.

    • Be customer centric as opposed to being technology driven.
    • Understand the business needs and pain points in order to effectively deliver solutions.
    • Approach infrastructure digital transformation in iterations and look at it as a journey.

    By completing the Info-Tech digital readiness questionnaire, you will see where you are in terms of maturity and areas you need to concentrate on.

    Info-Tech Insight

    By driving a customer-centric approach, delivering a successful transformation can be tailored to the business goals and drive adoption and engagement. Refining your roadmap through data and analytics will drive this change. Use third-party expertise to guide your transformation and help build that vision of the future.

    The cost of digital transformation

    The challenges that stand in the way of your success, and what is needed to reverse the risk

    What CIOs are saying about their challenges

    26% of those CIOs surveyed cite resistance to change, with entrenched viewpoints demonstrating a real need for a cultural shift to enhance the digital transformation journey.

    Source: Prophet, 2019.

    70% of digital transformation projects fall short of their objectives – even when their leadership is aligned, often with serious consequences.

    Source: BCG, 2020.

    Having a clear strategy and commitment from leadership, hiring and training the right people, monitoring and measuring your progress, and ensuring it is a business-led journey will increase your chances of success.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Cultural change, business alignment, skills training, and setting a clear strategy with KPIs to demonstrate success are all key to being successful in your digital journey.

    Small and medium-sized enterprises

    What business owners and CEOs are saying about their digital transformation

    57% of small business owners feel they must improve their IT infrastructure to optimize their operations.

    Source: SMB Story, 2023.

    64% of CEOs believe driving digital transformation at a rapid pace is critical to attracting and retaining talent and customers.

    Source: KPMG, 2022.

    Info-Tech Insight

    An IT infrastructure maturity assessment is a foundational step in the journey of digital transformation. The demand will be on performance, resilience, and scalability. IT infrastructure must be able to support innovation and rapid deployments.

    Optimize the Current Testing Process for Enterprise Mobile Applications

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}404|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Testing, Deployment & QA
    • Parent Category Link: /testing-deployment-and-qa
    • Your team has little or no experience in mobile testing.
    • You need to optimize current testing processes to include mobile.
    • You need to conduct an RFP for mobile testing tools.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • One-size-fits-all testing won’t work for mobile. The testing tools are fragmented.
    • Mobile offers many new test cases, so organizations can expect to spend more time testing.

    Impact and Result

    • Identify and address gaps between your current testing process and a target state that includes mobile testing.
    • Establish project value metrics to ensure business and technical requirements are met.

    Optimize the Current Testing Process for Enterprise Mobile Applications Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Assess the current testing state

    Determine a starting point for architecture and discuss pain points that will drive reusability.

    • Storyboard: Optimize the Current Testing Process for Enterprise Mobile Applications
    • Mobile Testing Project Charter Template
    • Visual SOP Template for Application Testing

    2. Determine the target state testing framework

    Document a preliminary list of test requirements and create vendor RFP and scoring.

    • Test Requirements Tool
    • Request for Proposal (RFP) Template

    3. Implement testing tools to support the testing SOP

    Create an implementation rollout plan.

    • Project Planning and Monitoring Tool

    Infographic

    Workshop: Optimize the Current Testing Process for Enterprise Mobile Applications

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Assess the Fit for Test Process Optimization

    The Purpose

    Understand mobile testing pain points.

    Evaluate current statistics and challenges around mobile testing and compare with your organization.

    Realize the benefits of mobile testing.

    Understand the differences of mobile testing.

    Assess your readiness for optimizing testing to include mobile.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Preliminary understanding of how mobile testing is different from conventional approaches to testing apps.

    Understanding of how mobile testing can optimize your current testing process.

    Activities

    1.1 Understand the pain points experienced with mobile testing

    1.2 Evaluate current statistics and challenges of mobile testing and compare your organization

    1.3 Realize the benefits that come from mobile testing

    1.4 Understand the differences between mobile app testing and conventional app testing

    1.5 Assess your readiness for optimizing the testing process to include mobile

    Outputs

    Organizational state assessment for mobile testing

    2 Structure & Launch the Project

    The Purpose

    Identify stakeholders for testing requirements gathering.

    Create a project charter to obtain project approval.

    Present and obtain project charter sign-off.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Well documented project charter.

    Approval to launch the project.

    Activities

    2.1 Identify stakeholders for testing requirements gathering

    2.2 Create a project charter to obtain project approval

    2.3 Present & obtain project charter sign-off

    Outputs

    Project objectives and scope

    Project roles and responsibilities

    3 Assess Current Testing State

    The Purpose

    Document your current non-mobile testing processes.

    Create a current testing visual SOP.

    Determine current testing pain points.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Thorough understanding of current testing processes and pain points.

    Activities

    3.1 Document your current non-mobile testing processes

    3.2 Create a current state visual SOP

    3.3 Determine current testing pain points

    Outputs

    Documented current testing processes in the form of a visual SOP

    List of current testing pain points

    4 Determine Target State Testing Framework

    The Purpose

    Determine your target state for mobile testing.

    Choose vendors for the RFP process.

    Evaluate selected vendor(s) against testing requirements.

    Design mobile testing visual SOP(s).

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Prioritized list of testing requirements for mobile.

    Vendor selection for mobile testing solutions through an RFP process.

    New SOP designed to include both current testing and mobile testing processes.

    Activities

    4.1 Determine your target state for mobile testing by following Info-Tech’s framework as a starting point

    4.2 Design new SOP to include testing for mobile apps

    4.3 Translate all considered visual SOP mobile injections into requirements

    4.4 Document the preliminary list of test requirements in the RFP

    4.5 Determine which vendors to include for the RFP process

    4.6 Reach out to vendors for a request for proposal

    4.7 Objectively evaluate vendors against testing requirements

    4.8 Identify and assess the expected costs and impacts from determining your target state

    Outputs

    List of testing requirements for mobile

    Request for Proposal

    5 Implement Testing Tools to Support Your Testing SOP

    The Purpose

    Develop an implementation roadmap to integrate new testing initiatives.

    Anticipate potential roadblocks during implementation rollout.

    Operationalize mobile testing and ensure a smooth hand-off to IT operations.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Creation of implementation project plan.

    List of approaches to mitigate potential implementation roadblocks.

    Achieving clean hand-off to IT ops team.

    Activities

    5.1 Develop a project plan to codify your current understanding of the scope of work

    5.2 Anticipate potential roadblocks during your tool’s implementation

    5.3 Operationalize your testing tools and ensure a smooth hand-off from the project team

    Outputs

    Mobile testing metrics implementation plan

    6 Conduct Your Retrospectives

    The Purpose

    Conduct regular retrospectives to consider areas for improvement.

    Adjust your processes, systems, and testing tools to improve performance and usability.

    Revisit implementation metrics to communicate project benefits.

    Leverage the lessons learned and apply them to other projects.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Project specific metrics.

    Discovery of areas to improve.

    Activities

    6.1 Conduct regular retrospectives to consider areas for improvement

    6.2 Revisit your implementation metrics to communicate project benefits to business stakeholders

    6.3 Adjust your processes, systems, and testing tools to improve performance and usability

    6.4 Leverage the lessons learned and apply them to other IT projects

    Outputs

    Steps to improve your mobile testing

    Assess Your IT Financial Management Maturity Effectively

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}315|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Cost & Budget Management
    • Parent Category Link: /cost-and-budget-management

    Organizations wishing to mature their IT financial management (ITFM) maturity often face the following obstacles:

    • Unfamiliarity: Lack of knowledge and understanding related to ITFM maturity.
    • Shortsightedness: Randomly reacting to changing circumstances.
    • Exchange: Inability to consistently drive dialogues.
    • Perception: IT is perceived as a cost center instead of a trustworthy strategic partner.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    No matter where you currently stand in your ITFM practice, there is always room for improvement. Hence, a maturity assessment should be viewed as a self-improvement tool that is only valuable if you are willing to act on it.

    Impact and Result

    A mature ITFM practice leads to many benefits.

    • Foundation: Improved governance, skill sets, processes, and tools.
    • Data: An appropriate taxonomy/data model alongside accurate data for high-quality reporting and insights.
    • Language: A common vocabulary across the organization.
    • Organization Culture: Improved communication and collaboration between IT and business partners.

    Assess Your IT Financial Management Maturity Effectively Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Assess Your IT Financial Management Maturity Effectively Storyboard – A framework and step-by-step methodology to assess your ITFM maturity.

    This research seeks to support IT leaders and ITFM practitioners in evaluating and improving their current maturity. It will help document both current and target states as well as prioritize focus areas for improvement.

    • Assess Your IT Financial Management Maturity Effectively Storyboard

    2. IT Financial Management Maturity Assessment Tool – A structured tool to help you assess your ITFM maturity.

    This Excel workbook guides IT finance practitioners to effectively assess their IT financial management practice. Incorporate the visual outputs into your final executive presentation document. Key activities include context setting, completing the assessment, and prioritizing focus areas based on results.

    • IT Financial Management Maturity Assessment Tool

    3. IT Financial Management Maturity Assessment Report Template – A report summarizing your ITFM maturity assessment results to help you communicate with stakeholders.

    Use this template to document your final ITFM maturity outputs, including the current and target states and your identified priorities.

    • IT Financial Management Maturity Assessment Report Template
    [infographic]

    Further reading

    Assess Your IT Financial Management Maturity Effectively

    Influence your organization’s strategic direction.

    Analyst Perspective

    Make better informed data-driven business decisions.

    Technology has been evolving throughout the years, increasing complexity and investments, while putting more stress on operations and people involved. As an IT leader, you are now entrusted to run your outfit as a business, sit at the executive table as a true partner, and be involved in making decisions that best suit your organization. Therefore, you have an obligation to fulfill the needs of your end customers and live up to their expectations, which is not an easy task.

    IT financial management (ITFM) helps you generate value to your organization’s clientele by bringing necessary trade-offs to light, while driving effective dialogues with your business partners and leadership team.

    This research will focus on Info-Tech’s approach to ITFM maturity, aiming for a state of continuous improvement, where an organization can learn and grow as it adapts to change. As the ITFM practice matures, IT and business leaders will be able to better understand one another and together make better business decisions, driven by data.

    This client advisory presentation and accompanying tool seek to support IT leaders and ITFM practitioners in evaluating and improving their current maturity. It will help document both current and target states as well as prioritize focus areas for improvement.

    Photo of Bilal Alberto Saab, Research Director, IT Financial Management, Info-Tech Research Group. Bilal Alberto Saab
    Research Director, IT Financial Management
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive Summary

    The value of ITFM is undermined

    ITFM is often discarded and not given enough importance and relevance due to the operational nature of IT, and the specialized skillset of its people, leading to several problems and challenges, such as:

    • Unfamiliarity: Lack of knowledge and understanding related to ITFM maturity.
    • Shortsightedness: Randomly reacting to changing circumstances.
    • Exchange: Inability to consistently drive dialogues.
    • Perception: IT is perceived as a cost center instead of a trustworthy strategic partner.

    Constructive dialogues with business partners are not the norm

    Business-driven conversations around financials (spending, cost, revenue) are a rarity in IT due to several factors, including:

    • Foundation: Weak governance, inadequate skillset, and less than perfect processes and tools.
    • Data: Lack of adequate taxonomy/data model, alongside inaccurate data leading to poor reporting and insights.
    • Language: Lack of a common vocabulary across the organization.
    • Organization culture: No alignment, alongside minimal communication and collaboration between IT and business partners.

    Follow Info-Tech’s approach to move up the ITFM maturity ladder

    Mature your ITFM practice by activating the means to make informed business decisions.

    Info-Tech’s methodology helps you move the dial by focusing on three maturity focus areas:

    • Build an ITFM Foundation
    • Manage and Monitor IT Spending
    • Bridge the Language Barrier

    Info-Tech Insight

    Influence your organization’s strategic direction by maturing your ITFM practice.

    What is ITFM?

    ITFM is not just about finance.

    • ITFM has evolved from traditional budgeting, accounting, and cost optimization; however, it is much more than those activities alone.
    • It starts with understanding the financial implications of technology by adopting different perspectives to become adept in communicating with various stakeholders, including finance, business partners, IT managers, and your CEO.
    • Armed with this knowledge, ITFM helps you address a variety of questions, such as:
      • How are technology funds being spent?
      • Which projects is IT prioritizing and why?
      • What are the resources needed to speed IT delivery?
      • What’s the value of IT within the organization?
    • ITFM’s main objective is thus to improve decision-making capabilities by facilitating communication between IT leaders and stakeholders, while enabling a customer focus attitude throughout the organization.

    “ITFM embeds technology in financial management practices. Through cost, demand, and value, ITFM brings technology and business together, forging the necessary relationships and starting the right conversations to enable the best decisions for the organization.”
    – Monica Braun, Research Director, Info-Tech Research Group

    Your challenge

    IT leaders struggle to articulate and communicate business value.

    • IT spending is often questioned by different stakeholders, such as business partners and various IT business units. These questions, usually resulting from shifts in business needs, may revolve around investments, expenditures, services, and speed to market, among others. While IT may have an idea about its spending habits, aligning it to the business strategy may prove difficult.
    • IT staff often does not have access to, or knowledge of, the business model and its intricacies. In an operational environment, the focus tends to be on technical issues rather than overall value.
    • People tend to fear what they do not know. Some business managers may not be comfortable with technology. They do not recognize the implications and ramifications of certain implementations or understand the related terminology, which puts a strain on any conversation.

    “Value is not the numbers you visualize on a chart, it’s the dialogue this data generates with your business partners and leadership team.”
    – Dave Kish, Practice Lead, Info-Tech Research Group

    Technology is constantly evolving

    Increasing IT spending and decision-making complexity.

    Timeline of IT technology evolution, starting with 'Timesharing' in the 1980s to 'All Things Digital' in the 2020s. 'IT Spend Growth' grows from start to finish.

    Common obstacles

    IT leaders are not able to have constructive dialogues with their stakeholders.

    • The way IT funds are spent has changed significantly, moving from the purchase of discrete hardware and software tools to implementing data lakes, cloud solutions, the metaverse and blockchain. This implies larger investments and more critical decisions. Conversations around interoperability, integration, and service-based solutions that focus more on big-picture architecture than day-to-day operations have become the norm.
    • Speed to market is now a survival criterion for most organizations, requiring IT to shift rapidly based on changing priorities and customer expectations. This leads to the need for greater financial oversight, with the CFO as the gatekeeper. Today’s IT leaders need to possess both business and financial management savvy to justify their spending with various stakeholders.
    • Any IT budget increase is tied to expectations of greater value. Hence, the compelling demands for IT to prove its worth to the business. Promoting value comes in two ways: 1) objectively, based on data, KPIs, and return on investment; and 2) subjectively, based on stakeholder satisfaction, alongside relationships. Building trust, credibility, and confidence can go a long way.

    In a technology-driven world, advances come at a price. With greater spending required, more complex and difficult conversations arise.

    Constructive dialogues are key

    You don’t know what you don’t know.

    • IT, being historically focused on operations, has become a hub for technically savvy personnel. On the downside, technology departments are often alien to business, causing problems such as:
      • IT staff have no knowledge of the business model and lack customer focus.
      • Business is not comfortable with technology and related jargon.
    • The lack of two-way communication and business alignment is hence an important ramification. If the business does not understand technology, and IT does not speak in business terms, where does that lead us?
    • Poor data quality and governance practices, alongside overly manual processes can only exasperate the situation.

    IT Spending Survey

    79% of respondents believe that decisions taking too long to make is either a significant or somewhat of a challenge (Flexera 2022 Tech Spend Pulse; N=501).

    81% of respondents believe that ensuring spend efficiency (avoiding waste) is either a challenge or somewhat of a challenge (Flexera 2022 Tech Spend Pulse; N=501).

    ITFM is trailing behind

    IT leaders must learn to speak business.

    In today’s world, where organizations are driving customer experience through technology investments, having a seat at the table means IT leaders must be well versed in business language and practice, including solid financial management skills.

    However, IT staff across all industries aren’t very confident in how well IT is doing in managing its finances. This becomes evident after looking at three core processes:

    • Demonstrating IT’s value to the business.
    • Accounting of costs and budgets.
    • Optimizing costs to gain the best return on investment.

    Recent data from 4,137 respondents to Info-Tech’s IT Management & Governance Diagnostic shows that while most IT staff feel that these three financial management processes are important, notably fewer feel that IT management is effective at executing on them.

    IT leadership’s capabilities around fundamental cost data capture appear to be lagging, not to mention the essential value-added capabilities around optimizing costs and demonstrating IT’s contribution to business value.

    Bar charts comparing percentages of people who 'Agree process is important' and 'Agree process is effective' for three processes: Business Value, Cost & Budget Management, and Cost Optimization. In all instances, the importance outweighed the perceived effectiveness.
    Source: Info-Tech Research Group, IT Management & Governance Diagnostic, 2023.

    Info-Tech’s approach

    We take a holistic approach to ITFM and support you throughout your maturity journey.

    Visualization of the IT maturity levels with three goals at the bottom, 'Build am ITFM Foundation', 'Manage & Monitor IT Spending', and 'Bridge the Language Barrier'. The 5 levels, from bottom to top, are 'Nascent - Level 1, Inability to consistently deliver financial planning services', 'Cost Operator - Level 2, Rudimentary financial planning capabilities', 'Trusted Coordinator - Level 3, Enablement of business through cost-effective supply of technology', 'Value Optimizer - Level 4, Effective impact on business performance', and 'Strategic Partner - Level 5, Influence on the organization's strategic direction'.

    The Info-Tech difference:

    • Info-Tech has a methodology and set of tools that will help assess your ITFM maturity and take the first step in developing an improvement plan. We have identified three maturity focus areas:
      • Build an ITFM Foundation
      • Manage and Monitor IT Spending
      • Bridge the Language Barrier
    • No matter where you currently stand in your ITFM practice, there is always room for improvement. Hence, a maturity assessment should be viewed as a self-improvement tool, which is only valuable if you are willing to act on it.

    Note: See Appendix A for maturity level definitions and descriptions.

    Climb the maturity ladder

    By growing along three maturity focus areas.

    A diagram with '3 Maturity Focus Areas' and '9 Maturity Levers' within them. The first area is 'Build an ITFM Foundation' with levers 'Establish your Team', 'Set up your Governance Structure', and 'Adopt ITFM Processes & Tools'. The second area is 'Manage & Monitor IT Spending', with levers 'Standardize your Taxonomy & Data Model', 'Identify, Gather & Prepare your Data', and 'Analyze your Findings and Develop your Reports'. The third area is 'Bridge the Language Barrier' with levers 'Communicate your IT Spending', 'Educate the Masses', and 'Influence your Organization's Culture'.

    Info-Tech identified three maturity focus areas, each containing three levers.

    Identify where you stand across the nine maturity levers, detect the gaps, and determine your priorities as a first step to develop an improvement plan.

    Note: See Appendix B for maturity level definitions and descriptions per lever.

    Key project deliverables

    Each step of this activity is accompanied by supporting deliverables to help you accomplish your goals.

    IT Financial Management Maturity Assessment Report Template

    A template of an ITFM maturity assessment report that can be customized based on your own results.

    IT Financial Management Maturity Assessment Tool

    A workbook including an ITFM maturity survey, generating a summary of your current state, target state, and priorities.

    Measure the value of this activity

    Reach your 12-month maturity target.

    • Determine your 12-month maturity target, identify your gaps, and set your priorities.
    • Use the ITFM maturity assessment to kickstart your improvement plan by developing actionable initiatives.
    • Implement your initiatives and monitor your progress to reach your 12-month target.

    Sample of a result page from the ITFM maturity assessment.

    Build your improvement plan and implement your initiatives to move the dial and climb the maturity ladder.

    Sample of a result page from the ITFM maturity assessment with a graph.

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    Guided Implementation

    Workshop

    Consulting

    "Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful." "Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track." "We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place." "Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project."

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

    Step 1

    Prepare for the ITFM maturity assessment

    Content Overview

    1. Identify your stakeholders
    2. Set the context
    3. Determine the methodology
    4. Identify assessment takers

    This step involves the following participants:

    • CIO/IT director
    • CFO/finance director
    • IT finance lead
    • IT audit lead
    • Other IT management

    1. Prepare to take the ITFM maturity assessment

    3 hours

    Input: Understanding your context, objectives, and methodology

    Output: ITFM maturity assessment stakeholders and their objectives, ITFM maturity assessment methodology, ITFM maturity assessment takers

    Materials: 1a. Prepare for Assessment tab in the ITFM Maturity Assessment Tool

    Participants: CIO/IT director, CFO/finance director, IT finance lead, IT audit lead, Other IT management

    1. Identify your stakeholders and document it in the ITFM Maturity Assessment Tool (see next slides). We recommend having representatives from different business units across the organization, most notably IT, IT finance, finance, and IT audit.
    2. Set the context with your stakeholders and document it in the ITFM Maturity Assessment Tool. Discuss the reason behind taking the ITFM maturity assessment among the various stakeholders. Why do each of your stakeholders want to take the assessment? What are their main objectives? What would they like to achieve?
    3. Determine the methodology and document it in the ITFM Maturity Assessment Tool. Discuss how you want to go about taking the assessment with your stakeholders. Do you want to have representatives from each business unit take the assessment individually, then share and discuss their findings? Do you prefer forming a working group with representatives from each business unit and go through the assessment together? Or does any of your stakeholders have a different suggestion? You will have to consider the effort, skillset, and knowledge required.
    4. Identify the assessment takers and document it in the ITFM Maturity Assessment Tool. Determine who will be taking the assessment (specific names of stakeholders). Consider their availability, knowledge, and skills.

    Download the IT Financial Management Maturity Assessment Tool

    TEMPLATE & EXAMPLE

    Document your stakeholders, objectives, and methodology

    Excel Workbook: ITFM Maturity Assessment Tool – Prepare for Assessment worksheet

    Refer to the example and guidelines below on how to document stakeholders, objectives, and methodology (table range: columns B to G and rows 8 to 15).

    Example table from the ITFM Maturity Assessment Tool re: 'Maturity Assessment Stakeholders'.

    Column ID Input Type Guidelines
    B Formula Automatic calculation, no entry required.
    C Text Enter the full name of each stakeholder on a separate row.
    D Text Enter the job title related to each stakeholder.
    E Text Enter the objective(s) related to each stakeholder.
    F Text Enter the agreed upon methodology.
    G Text Enter any notes or comments per stakeholder (optional).

    Review the following in the Excel workbook as per guidelines:

    1. Navigate to the 1a. Prepare for Assessment tab.
    2. Enter the full names and job titles of the ITFM maturity assessment stakeholders.
    3. Document the maturity assessment objective of each of your stakeholders.
    4. Document the agreed-upon methodology.

    Download the IT Financial Management Maturity Assessment Tool

    TEMPLATE & EXAMPLE

    Document your assessment takers

    Excel Workbook: ITFM Maturity Assessment Tool – Prepare for Assessment worksheet

    Refer to the example and guidelines below on how to document assessment takers (table range: columns B to E and rows 18 to 25).

    Example table from the ITFM Maturity Assessment Tool re: 'Maturity Assessment Takers'.

    Column ID Input Type Guidelines
    B Formula Automatic calculation, no entry required.
    C Text Enter the full name of each assessment taker on a separate row.
    D Text Enter the job title related to each stakeholder to identify which party is being represented per assessment taker.
    E Text Enter any notes or comments per stakeholder (optional).

    Review the following in the Excel workbook as per guidelines:

    1. Navigate to the 1a. Prepare for Assessment tab.
    2. Enter the full name of each assessment taker, along with the job title of the stakeholder they are representing.

    Download the IT Financial Management Maturity Assessment Tool

    Step 2

    Take the ITFM maturity assessment

    Content Overview

    1. Complete the survey
    2. Review your assessment results
    3. Determine your priorities

    This step involves the following participants:

    • CIO/IT director
    • CFO/finance director
    • IT finance lead
    • IT audit lead
    • Other IT management

    2. Take the ITFM maturity assessment

    3 hours

    Input: Understanding of your ITFM current state and 12-month target state, ITFM maturity assessment results

    Output: ITFM current- and target-state maturity levels, average scores, and variance, ITFM current- and target-state average scores, variance, and priority by maturity focus area and maturity lever

    Materials: 1b. Glossary, 2a. Assess ITFM Foundation, 2b. Assess Mngt. & Monitoring, 2c. Assess Language, and 3. Assessment Summary tabs in the ITFM Maturity Assessment Tool

    Participants: CIO/IT director, CFO/finance director, IT finance lead, IT audit lead, Other IT management

    1. Complete the survey: select the current and target state of each statement – refer to the glossary as needed for definitions of key terms – in the ITFM Maturity Assessment Tool (see next slides). There are three tabs (one per maturity focus area) with three tables each (nine maturity levers). Review and discuss statements with all assessment takers: consider variations, differing opinions, and reach an agreement on each statement inputs.
    2. Review assessment results: navigate to the Assessment Summary tab in the ITFM maturity assessment tool (see next slides) to view your results. Review and discuss with all assessment takers: consider any shocking output and adjust survey input if necessary.
    3. Determine your priorities: decide on the priority (Low/Medium/High) by maturity focus area and/or maturity lever. Rank your maturity focus area priorities from 1 to 3 and your maturity lever priorities from 1 to 9. Consider the feasibility in terms of timeframe, effort, and skillset required, positive and negative impacts on business and technology, likelihood of failure, and necessary approvals. Document your priorities in the ITFM maturity assessment tool (see next slides).
      Review and discuss priorities with all assessment takers: consider variations, differing opinions, and reach an agreement on each priority.

    Download the IT Financial Management Maturity Assessment Tool

    TEMPLATE & EXAMPLE

    Complete the survey

    Excel workbook: ITFM Maturity Assessment Tool – Survey worksheets

    Refer to the example and guidelines below on how to complete the survey.

    Example table from the ITFM Maturity Assessment Tool re: Survey worksheets.

    Column ID Input Type Guidelines
    B Formula Automatic calculation, no entry required.
    C Formula Automatic calculation, no entry required: ITFM maturity statement to assess.
    D, E Dropdown Select the maturity levels of your current and target states. One of five maturity levels for each statement, from “1. Nonexistent” (lowest maturity) to “5. Advanced” (highest maturity).
    F, G, H Formula Automatic calculation, no entry required: scores associated with your current and target state selection, along with related variance (column G – column F).
    I Text Enter any notes or comments per ITFM maturity statement (optional).

    Review the following in the Excel workbook as per guidelines:

    1. Navigate to the survey tabs: 2a. Assess ITFM Foundation, 2b. Assess Management and Monitoring, and 2c. Assess Language.
    2. Select the appropriate current and target maturity levels.
    3. Add any notes or comments per ITFM maturity statement where necessary or helpful.

    Download the IT Financial Management Maturity Assessment Tool

    TEMPLATE & EXAMPLE

    Review your overall result

    Excel Workbook: ITFM Maturity Assessment Tool – Assessment Summary worksheet

    Refer to the example and guidelines below on how to review your results.

    Example table from the ITFM Maturity Assessment Tool re: Assessment Summary worksheet.

    Column ID Input Type Guidelines
    K Formula Automatic calculation, no entry required.
    L Formula Automatic calculation, no entry required: Current State, Target State, and Variance entries. Please ignore the current state benchmark, it’s a placeholder for future reference.
    M Formula Automatic calculation, no entry required: average overall maturity score for your Current State and Target State entries, along with related Variance.
    N, O Formula Automatic calculation, no entry required: maturity level and related name based on the overall average score (column M), where level 1 corresponds to an average score less than or equal to 1.49, level 2 corresponds to an average score between 1.5 and 2.49 (inclusive), level 3 corresponds to an average score between 2.5 and 3.49 (inclusive), level 4 corresponds to an average score between 3.5 and 4.49 (inclusive), and level 5 corresponds to an average score between 4.5 and 5 (inclusive).
    P, Q Formula Automatic calculation, no entry required: maturity definition and related description based on the maturity level (column N).

    Review the following in the Excel workbook as per guidelines:

    1. Navigate to tab 3. Assessment Summary.
    2. Review your overall current state and target state result along with the corresponding variance.

    Download the IT Financial Management Maturity Assessment Tool

    TEMPLATE & EXAMPLE

    Set your priorities

    Excel Workbook: ITFM Maturity Assessment Tool – Assessment Summary worksheet

    Refer to the example and guidelines below on how to review your results per maturity focus area and maturity lever, then prioritize accordingly.

    Example table from the ITFM Maturity Assessment Tool re: Assessment Summary worksheet.

    Column ID Input Type Guidelines
    B Formula Automatic calculation, no entry required.
    C Formula Automatic calculation, no entry required: ITFM maturity focus area or lever, depending on the table.
    D Placeholder Ignore this column because it’s a placeholder for future reference.
    E, F, G Formula Automatic calculation, no entry required: average score related to the current state and target state, along with the corresponding variance per maturity focus area or lever (depending on the table).
    H Formula Automatic calculation, no entry required: preliminary priority based on the average variance (column G), where Low corresponds to an average variance between 0 and 0.5 (inclusive), Medium corresponds to an average variance between 0.51 and 0.99 (inclusive), and High corresponds to an average variance greater than or equal to 1.
    J Dropdown Select your final priority (Low, Medium, or High) per ITFM maturity focus area or lever, depending on the table.
    K Whole Number Enter the appropriate rank based on your priorities; do not use the same number more than once. A whole number between 1 and 3 to rank ITFM maturity focus areas, and between 1 and 9 to rank ITFM maturity levers, depending on the table.

    Review the following in the Excel workbook as per guidelines:

    1. Navigate to tab 3. Assessment Summary.
    2. Review your current-state and target-state result along with the corresponding variance per maturity focus area and maturity lever.
    3. Select the appropriate priority for each maturity focus area and maturity lever.
    4. Enter a unique rank for each maturity focus area (1 to 3).
    5. Enter a unique rank for each maturity lever (1 to 9).

    Download the IT Financial Management Maturity Assessment Tool

    Step 3

    Communicate your ITFM maturity results

    Content Overview

    1. Review your assessment charts
    2. Customize the assessment report
    3. Communicate your results

    This step involves the following participants:

    • CIO/IT director
    • CFO/finance director
    • IT finance lead
    • IT audit lead
    • Other IT management

    3. Communicate your ITFM maturity results

    3 hours

    Input: ITFM maturity assessment results

    Output: Customized ITFM maturity assessment report

    Materials: 3. Assessment Summary tab in the ITFM Maturity Assessment Tool, ITFM Maturity Assessment Report Template

    Participants: CIO/IT director, CFO/finance director, IT finance lead, IT audit lead, Other IT management

    1. Review assessment charts: navigate to the Assessment Summary tab in the ITFM Maturity Assessment Tool (see next slides) to view your results and related charts.
    2. Edit the report template: complete the template based on your results and priorities to develop your customized ITFM maturity assessment report (see next slide).
    3. Communicate results: communicate and deliberate the assessment results with assessment takers at a first stage, and with your stakeholders at a second stage. The objective is to agree on next steps, including developing an improvement plan.

    Download the IT Financial Management Maturity Assessment Tool

    TEMPLATE & EXAMPLE

    Review assessment charts

    Excel Workbook: ITFM Maturity Assessment Tool – Assessment Summary worksheet

    Refer to the example below on charts depicting different views of the maturity assessment results across the three focus areas and nine levers.

    Samples of different tabs from the ITFM Maturity Assessment Tool: 'Assessment Summary tab: From cell B49 to cell M100' and 'Assessment Summary tab: From cell K13 to cell Q34'.

    From the Excel workbook, after completing your potential initiatives and filling all related entries in the Outline Initiatives tab:

    1. Navigate to tab 3. Assessment Summary.
    2. Review each of the charts.
    3. Navigate back to the survey tabs to examine, drill down, and amend individual entries as you deem necessary.

    Download the IT Financial Management Maturity Assessment Tool

    TEMPLATE & EXAMPLE

    Customize your report

    PowerPoint presentation: ITFM Maturity Assessment Report Template

    Refer to the example below on slides depicting different views of the maturity assessment results across the three maturity focus areas and nine maturity levers.

    Samples of different slides from the ITFM Maturity Assessment Report Template, detailed below.

    Slide 6: Edit levels based on your assessment results. Copy and paste the appropriate maturity level definition and description from slide 4.

    Slide 7: Copy related charts from the assessment summary tab in the Excel workbook and remove the chart title. You can use the “Outer Offset: Bottom” shadow under shape effects on the chart.

    Slide 8: Copy related charts from the assessment summary tab in the Excel workbook and remove the chart title and legend. You can use the “Outer Offset: Center” shadow under shape effects on the chart.

    From the ITFM Maturity Assessment Report Template:

    1. Edit the report based on your results found in the assessment summary tab of the Excel workbook (see previous slide).
    2. Review slides 6 to 8 and bring necessary adjustments.

    Download the IT Financial Management Maturity Assessment Report Template

    Make informed business decisions

    Take a holistic approach to ITFM.

    • A thorough understanding of your technology spending in relation to business needs and drivers is essential to make informed decisions. As a trusted partner, you cannot have effective conversations around budgets and cost optimization without a solid foundation.
    • It is important to realize that ITFM is not a one-time exercise, but a continuous, sustainable process to educate (teach, mentor, and train), increase transparency, and assign responsibility.
    • Move up the ITFM maturity ladder by improving across three maturity focus areas:
      • Build an ITFM Foundation
      • Manage and Monitor IT Spending
      • Bridge the Language Barrier

    What’s Next?

    Communicate your maturity results with stakeholders and develop an actionable ITFM improvement plan.

    And remember, having informed discussions with your business partners and stakeholders, where technology helps propel your organization forward, is priceless!

    IT Financial Management Team

    Photo of Dave Kish, Practice Lead, ITFM Practice, Info-Tech Research Group. Dave Kish
    Practice Lead, ITFM Practice
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Photo of Jennifer Perrier, Principal Research Director, ITFM Practice, Info-Tech Research Group. Jennifer Perrier
    Principal Research Director, ITFM Practice
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Photo of Angie Reynolds, Principal Research Director, ITFM Practice, Info-Tech Research Group. Angie Reynolds
    Principal Research Director, ITFM Practice
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Photo of Monica Braun, Research Director, ITFM Practice, Info-Tech Research Group. Monica Braun
    Research Director, ITFM Practice
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Photo of Rex Ding, Research Specialist, ITFM Practice, Info-Tech Research Group. Rex Ding
    Research Specialist, ITFM Practice
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Photo of Aman Kumari, Research Specialist, ITFM Practice, Info-Tech Research Group. Aman Kumari
    Research Specialist, ITFM Practice
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Research Contributors and Experts

    Photo of Amy Byalick, Vice President, IT Finance, Info-Tech Research Group. Amy Byalick
    Vice President, IT Finance
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Amy Byalick is an IT Finance practitioner with 15 years of experience supporting CIOs and IT leaders elevating the IT financial storytelling and unlocking insights. Amy is currently working at Johnson Controls as the VP, IT Finance, previously working at PepsiCo, AmerisourceBergen, and Jacobs.
    Photo of Carol Carr, Technical Counselor, Executive Services, Info-Tech Research Group. Carol Carr
    Technical Counselor, Executive Services
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Photo of Scott Fairholm, Executive Counselor, Executive Services, Info-Tech Research Group. Scott Fairholm
    Executive Counselor, Executive Services
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Photo of Gokul Rajan, Executive Counselor, Executive Services, Info-Tech Research Group. Gokul Rajan
    Executive Counselor, Executive Services
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Photo of Allison Kinnaird, Practice Lead, Infrastructure & Operations, Info-Tech Research Group. Allison Kinnaird
    Practice Lead, Infrastructure & Operations
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Photo of Isabelle Hertanto, Practice Lead, Security & Privacy, Info-Tech Research Group. Isabelle Hertanto
    Practice Lead, Security & Privacy
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Related Info-Tech Research

    Sample of the IT spending transparency research. Achieve IT Spending Transparency

    Mature your ITFM practice by activating the means to make informed business decisions.

    Sample of the IT cost optimization roadmap research. Build Your IT Cost Optimization Roadmap

    Develop an IT cost optimization strategy based on your specific circumstances and timeline.

    Bibliography

    Eby, Kate. “The Complete Guide to Organizational Maturity: Models, Levels, and Assessments.” Smartsheet, 8 June 2022. Web.

    “Financial Management Maturity Model.” National Audit Office, n.d. Accessed 28 Apr. 2023.

    “ITFM/TBM Program Maturity Guide.” Nicus Software, n.d. Accessed 28 Apr. 2023.

    Jouravlev, Roman. "Service Financial Management: ITIL 4 Practice Guide." Axelos, 2020.

    McCarthy, Seamus. “Financial Management Maturity Model: A Good Practice Guide.” Office of the Comptroller & Auditor General, 26 June 2018. Web.

    “Principles for Effective Risk Data Aggregation and Risk Reporting.“ Bank for International Settlements, Jan. 2013. Web.

    “Role & Influence of the Technology Decision-Maker 2022.” Foundry, 2022. Web.

    Stackpole, Beth. “State of the CIO, 2022: Focus turns to IT fundamentals.” CIO, 21 March 2022. Web.

    “Tech Spend Pulse.” Flexera, 2022. Web.

    Appendix A

    Definition and Description
    Per Maturity Level

    ITFM maturity levels and definitions

    Maturity Level

    Definition

    Description

    Nascent
    Level 1
    Inability to consistently deliver financial planning services ITFM practices are almost inexistent. Only the most basic financial tasks and activities are being performed on an ad hoc basis to fulfill the Finance department’s requests.
    Cost Operator
    Level 2
    Rudimentary financial planning capabilities. ITFM activities revolve around minimizing the IT budget as much as possible. ITFM practices are not well defined, and IT’s financial view is limited to day-to-day technical operations.
    IT is only involved in low complexity decision making, where financial conversations center on general ledger items and IT spending.
    Trusted Coordinator
    Level 3
    Enablement of business through cost-effective supply of technology. ITFM activities revolve around becoming a proficient and cost-effective technology supplier to business partners.
    ITFM practices are in place, with moderate coordination and adherence to execution. Various IT business units coordinate to produce a consolidated financial view focused on business services.
    IT is involved in moderate complexity decision making, as a technology subject matter expert, where financial conversations center on IT spending in relation to technology services or solutions provided to business partners.
    Value Optimizer
    Level 4
    Effective impact on business performance. ITFM activities revolve around optimizing existing technology investments to improve both IT and business performance.
    ITFM practices are well managed, established, documented, repeatable, and integrated as necessary across the organization. IT’s financial view tie technology investments to lines of business, business products, and business capabilities.
    Business partners are well informed on the technology mix and drive related discussion. IT is trusted to contribute to complex decision making around existing investments to cost-effectively plan initiatives, as well as enhance business performance.
    Strategic Partner
    Level 5
    Influence on the organization’s strategic direction. ITFM activities revolve around predicting the outcome of new or potential technology investments to continuously optimize business performance.
    ITFM practices are fully optimized, reviewed, and improved in a continuous and sustainable manner, and related execution is tracked by gathering qualitative and quantitative feedback. IT’s financial view is holistic and fully integrated with the business, with an outlook on innovation, growth, and strategic transformation.
    Business and IT leaders know the financial ramifications of every business and technology investment decision. IT is trusted to contribute to strategic decision making around potential and future investments to grow and transform the business.

    Appendix B

    Maturity Level Definitions and Descriptions
    Per Lever

    Establish your ITFM team

    Maturity focus area: Build an ITFM foundation.

    Maturity Level

    Definition

    Description

    Nascent
    Level 1
    Inability to provide any type of financial insight.ITFM tasks, activities, and functions are not being met in any way, shape, or form.
    Cost Operator
    Level 2
    Ability to provide basic financial insights.There is no dedicated ITFM team.


    Basic ITFM tasks, activities, and functions are being performed on an ad hoc basis, such as high-level budget reporting.

    Trusted Coordinator
    Level 3
    Ability to provide basic business insights.A dedicated team is fulfilling essential ITFM tasks, activities, and functions.


    ITFM team can combine and analyze financial and technology data to produce necessary reports.

    Value Optimizer
    Level 4
    Ability to provide valuable business driven insights.A dedicated ITFM team with well-defined roles and responsibilities can provide effective advice to IT leaders, in a timely fashion, and positively influence IT decisions.
    Strategic Partner
    Level 5
    Ability to influence both technology and business decisions.A dedicated and highly specialized ITFM team is trusted and valued by both IT and Business leaders.


    Insights provided by the ITFM team can influence and shape the organization’s strategy.

    Set up your governance structure

    Maturity focus area: Build an ITFM foundation

    Maturity Level

    Definition

    Description

    Nascent
    Level 1
    Inability to ensure any adherence to rules and regulations.ITFM frameworks, guidelines, policies, and procedures are not developed nor documented.
    Cost Operator
    Level 2
    Ability to ensure basic adherence to rules and regulations.Basic ITFM frameworks, guidelines, policies, and procedures are in place, developed on an ad hoc basis, with no apparent coherence or complete documentation.
    Trusted Coordinator
    Level 3
    Ability to ensure compliance to rules and regulations, as well as accountability across ITFM processes.Essential ITFM frameworks, guidelines, policies, and procedures are in place, coherent, and documented, aiming to (a) comply with rules and regulations, and (b) provide clear accountability.
    Value Optimizer
    Level 4
    Ability to ensure compliance to rules and regulations, as well as structure, transparency, and business alignment across ITFM processes.ITFM frameworks, guidelines, policies, and procedures are well defined, coherent, documented, and regularly reviewed, aiming to (a) comply with rules and regulations, (b) provide clear accountability, and (c) maintain business alignment.
    Strategic Partner
    Level 5
    Ability to:
    • Ensure compliance to rules and regulations, as well as ITFM processes are transparent, structured, focused on business objectives, and support decision making.
    • Reinforce and shape the organization culture.
    ITFM frameworks, guidelines, policies, and procedures are complete, well defined, coherent, documented, continuously reviewed, and improved, aiming to (a) comply with rules and regulations, (b) provide clear accountability, (c) maintain business alignment, and (d) facilitate the decision-making process.


    Enforcement of the ITFM governance structure can influence the organization culture.

    Adopt ITFM processes and tools

    Maturity focus area: Build an ITFM foundation.

    Maturity Level

    Definition

    Description

    Nascent
    Level 1
    Inability to deliver IT financial planning and performance output.ITFM processes and tools are not developed nor documented.
    Cost Operator
    Level 2
    Ability to deliver basic IT financial planning output.Basic ITFM processes and tools are in place, developed on an ad hoc basis, with no apparent coherence or complete documentation.
    Trusted Coordinator
    Level 3
    Ability to deliver accurate IT financial output and basic IT performance output in a consistent cadence.Essential ITFM processes and tools are in place, coherent, and documented, aiming to (a) maintain integrity across activities, tasks, methodologies, data, and reports; (b) deliver IT financial planning and performance output needed by stakeholders; and (c) provide clear accountability. ITFM tools and processes are adopted by the ITFM team and some IT business units but are not fully integrated.
    Value Optimizer
    Level 4
    Ability to deliver accurate IT financial planning and performance output at the needed level of detail to stakeholders in a consistent cadence.ITFM processes and tools are complete, well defined, coherent, documented, continuously reviewed, and improved, aiming to (a) maintain integrity across activities, tasks, methodologies, data, and reports; (b) deliver IT financial planning and performance output needed by stakeholders; (c) provide clear accountability; and (d) facilitate decision-making. ITFM tools and processes are adopted by IT and business partners but are not fully integrated.
    Strategic Partner
    Level 5
    Ability to:
    • Deliver accurate IT financial planning and performance output at the needed level of detail to stakeholders.
    • Leverage IT financial planning and performance output in real time and when needed by stakeholders.
    ITFM processes and tools are complete, well defined, coherent, documented, continuously reviewed, and improved, aiming to (a) maintain integrity across activities, tasks, methodologies, data, and reports; (b) deliver IT financial planning and performance output needed by stakeholders; (c) provide clear accountability; and (d) facilitate decision making.


    ITFM processes and tools are automated to the full extent needed by the organization, utilized to their full potential, and integrated into a single enterprise platform, providing a holistic view of IT spending and IT performance.

    Standardize your taxonomy and data model

    Maturity focus area: Manage and monitor IT spending.

    Maturity Level

    Definition

    Description

    Nascent
    Level 1
    Inability to provide transparency across technology spending.ITFM taxonomy and data model are not developed nor documented.
    Cost Operator
    Level 2
    Ability to provide transparency and support IT financial planning data, analysis, and reporting needs of finance stakeholders.ITFM taxonomy and data model are in place, developed on an ad hoc basis, with no apparent coherence or complete documentation, to comply with, and meet the needs of finance stakeholders.
    Trusted Coordinator
    Level 3
    Ability to provide transparency and support IT financial planning and performance data, analysis, and reporting needs of IT and finance stakeholders.ITFM taxonomy and data model are in place, coherent, and documented to meet the needs of IT and finance stakeholders.
    Value Optimizer
    Level 4
    Ability to provide transparency and support IT financial planning and performance data, analysis, and reporting needs of IT, finance, business, and executive stakeholders.ITFM taxonomy and data model are complete, well defined, coherent, documented, continuously reviewed, and improved, aiming to provide (a) a holistic view of IT spending and IT performance, (b) visibility and transparency, (c) flexibility, and (d) valuable insights to facilitate data driven decision making.


    ITFM taxonomy and data model are standardized to meet the needs of IT, finance, business, and executive stakeholders, but not flexible enough to be adjusted in a timely fashion as needed.

    Strategic Partner
    Level 5
    Ability to:
    • Provide transparency and support IT financial planning and performance data, analysis, and reporting needs of IT, finance, business, and executive stakeholders.
    • Change to meet evolving needs.
    ITFM taxonomy and data model are complete, well defined, coherent, documented, continuously reviewed, and improved, aiming to provide (a) a holistic view of IT spending and IT performance, (b) visibility and transparency, (c) flexibility, and (d) valuable insights to facilitate data driven decision making.


    ITFM taxonomy and data model are standardized and meet the changing needs of IT, finance, business, and executive stakeholders.

    Identify, gather, and prepare your data

    Maturity focus area: Manage and monitor IT spending.

    Maturity Level

    Definition

    Description

    Nascent
    Level 1
    Inability to provide accurate and complete across technology spending.ITFM data needs and requirements are not understood.
    Cost Operator
    Level 2
    Ability to provide accurate, but incomplete IT financial planning data to meet the needs of finance stakeholders.Technology spending data is extracted, transformed, and loaded on an ad hoc basis to meet the needs of finance stakeholders.
    Trusted Coordinator
    Level 3
    Ability to provide accurate and complete IT financial planning data to meet the needs of IT and finance stakeholders, but IT performance data remain incomplete.IT financial planning data is extracted, transformed, and loaded in a regular cadence to meet the needs of IT and finance stakeholders.


    IT financial planning data is (a) complete and accurate, as defined in related control documents (guideline, policies, procedures, etc.), (b) regularly validated for inconsistencies, and (c) sourced from the organization’s system of record.

    Value Optimizer
    Level 4
    Ability to provide accurate and complete IT financial planning and performance data to meet the needs of IT, finance, business, and executive stakeholders.ITFM data needs and requirements are understood.


    ITFM data is extracted, transformed, and loaded in a regular cadence to meet the needs of IT, finance, business, and executive stakeholders.


    IT financial planning and performance data are (a) complete and accurate, as defined in related control documents (guideline, policies, procedures, etc.), (b) regularly validated for inconsistencies, and (c) sourced from the organization’s system of record.

    Strategic Partner
    Level 5
    Ability to provide accurate and complete IT financial planning and performance data real time and when needed by IT, finance, business, and executive stakeholders.ITFM data needs and requirements are understood.


    IT financial planning and performance data are (a) complete and accurate, as defined in related control documents (guideline, policies, procedures, etc.), (b) regularly validated for inconsistencies, (c) available and refreshed as needed, and (d) sourced from the organization’s system of record.

    Analyze your findings and develop your reports

    Maturity focus area: Manage and monitor IT spending.

    Maturity Level

    Definition

    Description

    Nascent
    Level 1
    Inability to provide any type of financial insight.ITFM analysis and reports are not developed nor documented.
    Cost Operator
    Level 2
    Ability to provide basic financial insights.IT financial planning analysis is conducted on an ad hoc basis to meet the needs of finance stakeholders.
    Trusted Coordinator
    Level 3
    Ability to provide basic financial planning and performance insights to meet the needs of IT and finance stakeholders.IT financial planning and performance analysis are methodical and rigorous, as defined in related control documents (guideline, policies, procedures, etc.).


    IT financial planning and performance reports are accurate, precise, and methodical, as defined in related control documents (guideline, policies, procedures, etc.).

    Value Optimizer
    Level 4
    Ability to provide practical insights and useful recommendations as needed by IT, finance, business, and executive stakeholders to facilitate business decision making around technology investments.ITFM analysis and reports support business decision making around technology investments.


    IT financial planning and performance analysis are methodical and rigorous, as defined in related control documents (guideline, policies, procedures, etc.).


    IT financial planning and performance reports are (a) accurate, precise, and methodical, as defined in related control documents (guideline, policies, procedures, etc.), (b) fit for purpose, and (c) regularly validated for inconsistencies.

    Strategic Partner
    Level 5
    Ability to provide practical insights and useful recommendations as needed by IT, finance, business, and executive stakeholders to facilitate strategic decision making.ITFM analysis and reports support strategic decision making.


    IT financial planning and performance analysis are methodical and rigorous, as defined in related control documents (guideline, policies, procedures, etc.), and consider multiple point of views (hypotheses, interpretations, opinions, etc.).


    IT financial planning and performance reports are (a) accurate, precise, and methodical, as defined in related control documents (guideline, policies, procedures, etc.), (b) fit for purpose, (c) comprehensive, and (d) regularly validated for inconsistencies.

    Communicate your IT spending

    Maturity focus area: Bridge the language barrier.

    Maturity Level

    Definition

    Description

    Nascent
    Level 1
    Inability of organization stakeholders to communicate and understand each other.The organization stakeholders including IT, finance, business, and executives do not understand one another, and cannot speak the same language.
    Cost Operator
    Level 2
    Ability to understand business and finance requirements.IT understands and meets business and financial planning requirements but does not communicate in a similar language.


    IT cannot influence finance or business decision making.

    Trusted Coordinator
    Level 3
    Ability to understand the needs of different stakeholders including IT, finance, business, and executives and take part in decision making around technology spending.The organization stakeholders including IT, finance, business, and executives understand each other’s needs, but do not communicate in a common language.


    IT leaders provide insights as technology subject matter experts, where conversations center on IT spending in relation to technology services or solutions provided to business partners.


    IT can influence technology decisions around its own budget.

    Value Optimizer
    Level 4
    Ability to communicate in a common vocabulary across the organization and take part in business decision making around technology investments.The organization stakeholders including IT, finance, business, and executives communicate in a common vocabulary and understand one another.


    IT and business leaders, along with their respective teams, collaborate frequently across various initiatives.


    IT leaders provide valuable insight to support and influence business decision making around existing technology investments.

    Strategic Partner
    Level 5
    Ability to communicate in a common vocabulary across the organization and take part in strategic decision making.The organization stakeholders including IT, finance, business, and executives communicate in a common vocabulary and understand one another.


    IT and business leaders, along with their respective teams, collaborate frequently across various initiatives.


    IT leaders provide valuable insight to facilitate decision making around potential and future investments to grow and transform the business, thus influencing the organization’s overall strategic direction.

    Educate the masses

    Maturity focus area: Bridge the language barrier.

    Maturity Level

    Definition

    Description

    Nascent
    Level 1
    Inability of organization stakeholders to acquire knowledge.Educational resources are inexistent.
    Cost Operator
    Level 2
    Ability to acquire financial knowledge and understand financial concepts.IT leaders have access to educational resources to gain the financial knowledge necessary to perform their duties.
    Trusted Coordinator
    Level 3
    Ability to acquire financial and business knowledge and understand related concepts.IT leaders and their respective teams have access to educational resources to gain the financial and business knowledge necessary to perform their duties.


    ITFM team has access to the necessary educational resources to keep up with changing financial regulations and technology developments.

    Value Optimizer
    Level 4
    Ability to acquire knowledge, across technology, business, and finance as needed by different organization stakeholders, and the leadership understand concepts across these various domains.Stakeholders including IT, finance, business, and executives have access to various educational resources to gain knowledge in different domains as needed.


    IT leaders have a good understanding of business and financial concepts.


    Business leaders have a good understanding of technology concepts.

    Strategic Partner
    Level 5
    Ability to acquire knowledge, and understand concepts across technology, business, and finance as needed by different organization stakeholders.The organization promotes continuous learning through well designed programs including training, mentorship, and academic courses. Thus, stakeholders including IT, finance, business, and executives have access to various educational resources to gain knowledge in different domains as needed.


    IT leaders and their respective teams have a good understanding of business and financial concepts.


    Business leaders and their respective teams have a good understanding of technology concepts.

    Influence your organization’s culture

    Maturity focus area: Bridge the language barrier.

    Maturity Level

    Definition

    Description

    Nascent
    Level 1
    Inability to provide and foster an environment of collaboration and continuous improvement.Stakeholders including IT, finance, business, and executives operate in silos, and collaboration between different teams is inexistent.
    Cost Operator
    Level 2
    Ability to provide an environment of cooperation to meet the needs of IT, finance, and business leaders.IT, finance, and business leaders cooperate to meet financial planning requirements as necessary to perform their duties.
    Trusted Coordinator
    Level 3
    Ability to provide and foster an environment of collaboration across the organization.IT, finance, and business collaborate on various initiatives.

    ITFM employees are trusted and supported by their stakeholders (IT, finance, and business).

    Value Optimizer
    Level 4
    Ability to provide and foster an environment of collaboration and continuous improvement, where employees across the organization feel trusted, supported, empowered, and valued.Stakeholders including IT, finance, business, and executives support and promote continuous improvement, transparency practices, and collaboration across the organization.


    Employees are trusted, supported, empowered, and valued.

    Strategic Partner
    Level 5
    Ability to provide and foster an environment of collaboration and continuous improvement, where leaders are willing to change, and employees across the organization feel trusted, supported, empowered, and valued.Stakeholders including IT, finance, business, and executives support and promote continuous improvement, transparency practices, and collaboration across the organization.


    The organization’s leadership is adaptable and open to change.


    Employees are trusted, supported, empowered, and valued.

    Renovate the Data Center

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}497|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Data Center & Facilities Optimization
    • Parent Category Link: /data-center-and-facilities-optimization
    • 33% of enterprises will be undertaking facility upgrades or refreshes in 2010 aimed at extending the life of their existing data centers.
    • Every upgrade or refresh targeting specific components in the facility to address short-term pain will have significant impact on the data center environment as a whole. Planning upfront and establishing a clear project scope will minimize expensive changes in later years.
    • This solution set will provide you with step-by-step design, planning, and selection tools to define a Data Center renovation plan to reduce cost and risk while supporting cost-effective long-term growth for power, cooling, standby power, and fire protection renovations.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • 88% of organizations cited they would spend more time and effort on documenting and identifying facility requirements for initial project scoping. Organizations can prevent scope creep by conducting the necessary project planning up front and identify requirements and the effect that the renovation project will have in all areas of the data center facility.
    • Data Center facilities renovations must include the specific requirements related to power provisioning, stand-by power, cooling, and fire protection - not just the immediate short-term pain.
    • 39% of organizations cited they would put more emphasis on monitoring contractor management and performance to improve the outcome of the data center renovation project.

    Impact and Result

    • Early internal efforts to create a budget and facility requirements yields better cost and project outcomes when construction begins. Each data center renovation project is unique and should have its own detailed budget.
    • Upfront planning and detailed project scoping can prevent a cascading impact on data center renovation projects to other areas of the data center that can increase project size, scope and spend.
    • Contractor selection is one of the most important first steps in a complex data center renovation. Organizations must ensure the contractor selected has experience specifically in data center renovation.

    Renovate the Data Center Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Identify and understand the renovation project.

    • Storyboard: Renovate the Data Center
    • None
    • Data Center Annual Review Checklist

    2. Renovate power in the data center.

    • Data Center Power Requirements Calculator

    3. Renovate cooling in the data center.

    • Data Center Cooling Requirements Calculator

    4. Renovate standby power in the data center.

    • Data Center Standby Power Requirements Calculator

    5. Define current and future fire protection requirements.

    • Fire Protection & Suppression Engineer Selection Criteria Checklist
    • None

    6. Assess the opportunities and establish a clear project scope.

    • Data Center Renovation Project Charter
    • Data Center Renovation Project Planning & Monitoring Tool

    7. Establish a budget for the data center renovation project.

    • Data Center Renovation Budget Tool

    8. Select a general contractor to execute the project.

    • None
    • Data Center Renovation Contractor Scripted Interview
    • Data Center Renovation Contractor Scripted Interview Scorecard
    • Data Center Renovation Contractor Reference Checklist
    [infographic]

    Build an IT Risk Management Program

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}192|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 8.3/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $31,532 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 17 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: IT Governance, Risk & Compliance
    • Parent Category Link: /it-governance-risk-and-compliance
    • Risk is unavoidable. Without a formal program to manage IT risk, you may be unaware of your severest IT risks.
    • The business could be making decisions that are not informed by risk.
    • Reacting to risks AFTER they occur can be costly and crippling, yet it is one of the most common tactics used by IT departments.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • IT risk is business risk. Every IT risk has business implications. Create an IT risk management program that shares accountability with the business.

    Impact and Result

    • Transform your ad hoc IT risk management processes into a formalized, ongoing program, and increase risk management success.
    • Take a proactive stance against IT threats and vulnerabilities by identifying and assessing IT’s greatest risks before they occur.
    • Involve key stakeholders including the business senior management team to gain buy-in and to focus on IT risks most critical to the organization.

    Build an IT Risk Management Program Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Build an IT Risk Management Program – A holistic approach to managing IT risks within your organization and involving key business stakeholders.

    Gain business buy-in to understanding the key IT risks that could negatively impact the organization and create an IT risk management program to properly identify, assess, respond, monitor, and report on those risks.

    • Build an IT Risk Management Program – Phases 1-3

    2. Risk Management Program Manual – A single source of truth for the risk management program to exist and be updated to reflect changes.

    Leverage this Risk Management Program Manual to ensure that the decisions around how IT risks will be governed and managed can be documented in a single source accessible by those involved.

    • Risk Management Program Manual

    3. Risk Register & Risk Costing Tool – A set of tools to document identified risk events. Assess each risk event and consider the appropriate response based on your organization’s threshold for risk.

    Engage these tools in your organization if you do not currently have a GRC tool to document risk events as they relate to the IT function. Consider the best risk response to high severity risk events to ensure all possible situations are considered.

    • Risk Register Tool
    • Risk Costing Tool

    4. Risk Event Action Plan and Risk Report – A template to document the chosen risk responses and ensure accountable owners agree on selected response method.

    Establish clear guidelines and responses to risk events that will leave your organization vulnerable to unwanted threats. Ensure risk owners have agreed to the risk responses and are willing to take accountability for that response.

    • Risk Event Action Plan
    • Risk Report

    Infographic

    Workshop: Build an IT Risk Management Program

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Review IT Risk Fundamentals and Governance

    The Purpose

    To assess current risk management maturity, develop goals, and establish IT risk governance.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Identified obstacles to effective IT risk management.

    Established attainable goals to increase maturity.

    Clearly laid out risk management accountabilities and responsibilities for IT and business stakeholders.

    Activities

    1.1 Assess current program maturity

    1.2 Complete RACI chart

    1.3 Create the IT risk council

    1.4 Identify and engage key stakeholders

    1.5 Add organization-specific risk scenarios

    1.6 Identify risk events

    Outputs

    Maturity Assessment

    Risk Management Program Manual

    Risk Register

    2 Identify IT Risks

    The Purpose

    Identify and assess all IT risks.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Created a comprehensive list of all IT risk events.

    Risk events prioritized according to risk severity – as defined by the business.

    Activities

    2.1 Identify risk events (continued)

    2.2 Augment risk event list using COBIT 5 processes

    2.3 Determine the threshold for (un)acceptable risk

    2.4 Create impact and probability scales

    2.5 Select a technique to measure reputational cost

    2.6 Conduct risk severity level assessment

    Outputs

    Finalized List of IT Risk Events

    Risk Register

    Risk Management Program Manual

    3 Identify IT Risks (continued)

    The Purpose

    Prioritize risks, establish monitoring responsibilities, and develop risk responses for top risks.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Risk monitoring responsibilities are established.

    Risk response strategies have been identified for all key risks.

    Activities

    3.1 Conduct risk severity level assessment

    3.2 Document the proximity of the risk event

    3.3 Conduct expected cost assessment

    3.4 Develop key risk indicators (KRIs) and escalation protocols

    3.5 Root cause analysis

    3.6 Identify and assess risk responses

    Outputs

    Risk Register

    Risk Management Program Manual

    Risk Event Action Plans

    4 Monitor, Report, and Respond to IT Risk

    The Purpose

    Assess and select risk responses for top risks and effectively communicate recommendations and priorities to the business.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Thorough analysis has been conducted on the value and effectiveness of risk responses for high severity risk events.

    Authoritative risk response recommendations can be made to senior leadership.

    A finalized Risk Management Program Manual is ready for distribution to key stakeholders.

    Activities

    4.1 Identify and assess risk responses

    4.2 Risk response cost-benefit analysis

    4.3 Create multi-year cost projections

    4.4 Review techniques for embedding risk management in IT

    4.5 Finalize the Risk Report and Risk Management Program Manual

    4.6 Transfer ownership of risk responses to project managers

    Outputs

    Risk Report

    Risk Management Program Manual

    Further reading

    Build an IT Risk Management Program

    Mitigate the IT risks that could negatively impact your organization.

    Table of Contents

    3 Executive Brief

    4 Analyst Perspective

    5 Executive Summary

    19 Phase 1: Review IT Risk Fundamentals & Governance

    43 Phase 2: Identify and Assess IT Risk

    74 Phase 3: Monitor, Communicate, and Respond to IT Risk

    102 Appendix

    108 Bibliography

    Build an IT Risk Management Program

    Mitigate the IT risks that could negatively impact your organization.

    EXECUTIVE BRIEF

    Analyst Perspective

    Siloed risks are risky business for any enterprise.

    Photo of Valence Howden, Principal Research Director, CIO Practice.
    Valence Howden
    Principal Research Director, CIO Practice
    Photo of Brittany Lutes, Senior Research Analyst, CIO Practice.
    Brittany Lutes
    Senior Research Analyst, CIO Practice

    Risk is an inherent part of life but not very well understood or executed within organizations. This has led to risk being avoided or, when it’s implemented, being performed in isolated siloes with inconsistencies in understanding of impact and terminology.

    Looking at risk in an integrated way within an organization drives a truer sense of the thresholds and levels of risks an organization is facing – making it easier to manage and leverage risk while reducing risks associated with different mitigation responses to the same risk events.

    This opens the door to using risk information – not only to prevent negative impacts but as a strategic differentiator in decision making. It helps you know which risks are worth taking, driving strong positive outcomes for your organization.

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    IT has several challenges when it comes to addressing risk management:

    • Risk is unavoidable. Without a formal program to manage IT risk, you may be unaware of your severest IT risks.
    • The business could be making decisions that are not informed by risk.
    • Reacting to risks after they occur can be costly and crippling, yet it is one of the most common tactics used by IT departments.

    Common Obstacles

    Many IT organizations realize these obstacles:

    • IT risks and business risks are often addressed separately, causing inconsistencies in the approach.
    • Security risk receives such a high profile that it often eclipses other important IT risks, leaving the organization vulnerable.
    • Failing to include the business in IT risk management leaves IT leaders too accountable; the business must have accountability as well.

    Info-Tech’s Approach

    • Transform your ad hoc IT risk management processes into a formalized, ongoing program and increase risk management success.
    • Take a proactive stance against IT threats and vulnerabilities by identifying and assessing IT’s greatest risks before they occur.
    • Involve key stakeholders, including the business senior management team, to gain buy-in and to focus on the IT risks most critical to the organization.

    Info-Tech Insight

    IT risk is business risk. Every IT risk has business implications. Create an IT risk management program that shares accountability with the business.

    Ad hoc approaches to managing risk fail because…

    If you are like the majority of IT departments, you do not have a consistent and comprehensive strategy for managing IT risk.

    1. Ad hoc risk management is reactionary.
    2. Ad hoc risk management is often focused only on IT security.
    3. Ad hoc risk management lacks alignment with business objectives.

    The results:

    • Increased business risk exposure caused by a lack of understanding of the impact of IT risks on the business.
    • Increased IT non-compliance, resulting in costly settlements and fines.
    • IT audit failure.
    • Ineffective management of risk caused by poor risk information and wrong risk response decisions.
    • Increased unnecessary and avoidable IT failures and fixes.

    58% of organizations still lack a systematic and robust method to actually report on risks (Source: AICPA, 2021)

    Data is an invaluable asset – ensure it’s protected

    Case Studies

    Logo for Cognyte.

    Cognyte, a vendor hired to be a cybersecurity analytics company, had over five billion records exposed in Spring 2021. The data was compromised for four days, providing attackers with plenty of opportunities to obtain personally identifying information. (SecureBlink., 2021 & Security Magazine, 2021)

    Logo for Facebook.

    Facebook, the world’s largest social media giant, had over 533 million Facebook users’ personal data breached when data sets were able to be cross-listed with one another. (Business Insider, 2021 & Security Magazine, 2021)

    Logo for MGM Resorts.

    In 2020, over 10.6 million customers experienced some sort of data being accessible, with 1,300 having serious personally identifying information breached. (The New York Times, 2020)

    Risk management is a business enabler

    Formalize risk management to increase your likelihood of success.

    By identifying areas of risk exposure and creating solutions proactively, obstacles can be removed or circumvented before they become a real problem.

    A certain amount of risk is healthy and can stimulate innovation:

    • A formal risk management strategy doesn’t mean trying to mitigate every possible risk; it means exposing the organization to the right amount of risk.
    • Taking a formal risk management approach allows an organization to thoughtfully choose which risks it is willing to accept.
    • Organizations with high risk management maturity will vault themselves ahead of the competition because they will be aware of which risks to prepare for, which risks to ignore, and which risks to take.

    Only 12% of organizations are using risk as a strategic tool most or all of the time (Source: AICPA, 2021)

    IT risk is enterprise risk

    Accountability for IT risks and the decisions made to address them should be shared between IT and the business.

    Multiple types of risk, 'Finance', 'IT', 'People', and 'Digital', funneling into 'ENTERPRISE RISKS'. IT risks have a direct and often aggregated impact on enterprise risks and opportunities in the same way other business risks can. This relationship must be understood and addressed through integrated risk management to ensure a consistent approach to risk.

    Follow the steps of this blueprint to build or optimize your IT risk management program

    Cycle of 'Goverance' beginning with '1. Identify', '2. Assess', '3. Respond', '4. Monitor', '5. Report'.

    Start Here

    PHASE 1
    Review IT Risk Fundamentals and Governance
    PHASE 2
    Identify and Assess IT Risk
    PHASE 3
    Monitor, Report, and Respond to IT Risk

    1.1

    Review IT Risk Management Fundamentals

    1.2

    Establish a Risk Governance Framework

    2.1

    Identify IT Risks

    2.2

    Assess and Prioritize IT Risks

    3.1

    Monitor IT Risks and Develop Risk Responses

    3.2

    Report IT Risk Priorities

    Integrate Risk and Use It to Your Advantage

    Accelerate and optimize your organization by leveraging meaningful risk data to make intelligent enterprise risk decisions.

    Risk management is more than checking an audit box or demonstrating project due diligence.

    Risk Drivers
    • Audit & compliance
    • Preserve value & avoid loss
    • Previous risk impact driver
    • Major transformation
    • Strategic opportunities
    Arrow pointing right. Only 7% of organizations are in a “leading” or “aspirational” level of risk maturity. (OECD, 2021) 63% of organizations struggle when it comes to defining their appetite toward strategy related risks. (“Global Risk Management Survey,” Deloitte, 2021) Late adopters of risk management were 70% more likely to use instinct over data or facts to inform an efficient process. (Clear Risk, 2020) 55% of organizations have little to no training on ERM to properly implement such practices. (AICPA, NC State Poole College of Management, 2021)
    1. Assess Enterprise Risk Maturity 3. Build a Risk Management Program Plan 4. Establish Risk Management Processes 5. Implement a Risk Management Program
    2. Determine Authority with Governance
    Unfortunately, less than 50% of those in risk focused roles are also in a governance role where they have the authority to provide risk oversight. (Governance Institute of Australia, 2020)
    IT can improve the maturity of the organization’s risk governance and help identify risk owners who have authority and accountability.

    Governance and related decision making is optimized with integrated and aligned risk data.

    List of 'Integrated Risk Maturity Categories': '1. Context & Strategic Direction', '2. Risk Culture and Authority', '3. Risk Management Process', and '4. Risk Program Optimization'. The five types of a risk in 'Enterprise Risk Management (ERM)': 'IT', 'Security', 'Digital', 'Vendor/TPRM', and 'Other'.

    ERM incorporates the different types of risk, including IT, security, digital, vendor, and other risk types.

    The program plan is meant to consider all the major risk types in a unified approach.

    The 'Risk Process' cycle starting with '1. Identify', '2. Assess', '3. Respond', '4. Monitor', '5. Report', and back to the beginning. Implementation of an integrated risk management program requires ongoing access to risk data by those with decision making authority who can take action.

    Blueprint deliverables

    Each step of this blueprint is accompanied by supporting deliverables to help you accomplish your goals:

    Key deliverable:

    Risk Management Program Manual

    Use the tools and activities in each phase of the blueprint to create a comprehensive, customized program manual for the ongoing management of IT risk.

    Sample of the key deliverable, Risk Manangement Program Fund.
    Integrated Risk Maturity Assessment

    Assess the organization's current maturity and readiness for integrated risk management (IRM).

    Sample of the Integrated Risk Maturity Assessment blueprint. Centralized Risk Register

    The repository for all the risks that have been identified within your environment.

    Sample of the Centralized Risk Register blueprint.
    Risk Costing Tool

    A potential cost-benefit analysis of possible risk responses to determine a good method to move forward.

    Sample of the Risk Costing Tool blueprint. Risk Report & Risk Event Action Plan

    A method to report risk severity and hold risk owners accountable for chosen method of responding.

    Samples of the Risk Report & Risk Event Action Plan blueprints.

    Benefit from industry-leading best practices

    As a part of our research process, we used the COSO, ISO 31000, and COBIT 2019 frameworks. Contextualizing IT risk management within these frameworks ensured that our project-focused approach is grounded in industry-leading best practices for managing IT risk.

    Logo for COSO.

    COSO’s Enterprise Risk Management — Integrating with Strategy and Performance addresses the evolution of enterprise risk management and the need for organizations to improve their approach to managing risk to meet the demands of an evolving business environment. (COSO)

    Logo for ISO.

    ISO 31000
    Risk Management can help organizations increase the likelihood of achieving objectives, improve the identification of opportunities and threats, and effectively allocate and use resources for risk treatment. (ISO 31000)

    Logo for COBIT.

    COBIT 2019’s IT functions were used to develop and refine our Ten IT Risk Categories used in our top-down risk identification methodology. (COBIT 2019)

    Abandon ad hoc risk management

    A strong risk management foundation is valuable when building your IT risk management program.

    This research covers the following IT risk fundamentals:

    • Benefits of formalized risk management
    • Key terms and definitions
    • Risk management within ERM
    • Risk management independent of ERM
    • Four key principles of IT risk management
    • Importance of a risk management program manual
    • Importance of buy-in and support from the business

    Drivers of Formalized Risk Management:

    Drivers External to IT
    External Audit Internal Audit
    Mandated by ERM
    Occurrence of Risk Event
    Demonstrating IT’s value to the business Proactive initiative
    Emerging IT risk awareness
    Grassroots Drivers

    Blueprint benefits

    IT Benefits

    • Increased on-time, in-scope, and on-budget completion of IT projects.
    • Meet the business’ service requirements.
    • Improved satisfaction with IT by senior leadership and business units.
    • Fewer resources wasted on fire-fighting.
    • Improved availability, integrity, and confidentiality of sensitive data.
    • More efficient use of resources.
    • Greater ability to respond to evolving threats.

    Business Benefits

    • Reduced operational surprises or failures.
    • Improved IT flexibility when responding to risk events and market fluctuations.
    • Reduced budget uncertainty.
    • Improved ability to make decisions when developing long-term strategies.
    • Improved stakeholder and shareholder confidence.
    • Achieved compliance with external regulations.
    • Competitive advantage over organizations with immature risk management practices.

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    Guided Implementation

    Workshop

    Consulting

    "Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful." "Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track." "We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place." "Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project."

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

    Guided Implementation

    A Guided Implementation (GI) is a series of calls with an Info-Tech analyst to help implement our best practices in your organization.

    A typical GI is 6 to 8 calls over the course of 3 to 6 months.

    What does a typical GI on this topic look like?

      Phase 1

    • Call #1: Assess current risk maturity and organizational buy-in.
    • Call #2: Establish an IT risk council and determine IT risk management program goals.
    • Phase 2

    • Call #3: Identify the risk categories used to organize risk events.
    • Call #4: Identify the threshold for risk the organization can withstand.
    • Phase 3

    • Call #5: Create a method to assess risk event severity.
    • Call #6: Establish a method to monitor priority risks and consider possible risk responses.
    • Call #7: Communicate risk priorities to the business and implement risk management plan.

    Workshop Overview

    Contact your account representative for more information.
    workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8889

    Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5
    Activities
    Review IT Risk Fundamentals and Governance

    1.1 Assess current program maturity

    1.2 Complete RACI chart

    1.3 Create the IT risk council

    1.4 Identify and engage key stakeholders

    1.5 Add organization-specific risk scenarios

    1.6 Identify risk events

    Identify IT Risks

    2.1 Identify risk events (continued)

    2.2 Augment risk event list using COBIT5 processes

    2.3 Determine the threshold for (un)acceptable risk

    2.4 Create impact and probability scales

    2.5 Select a technique to measure reputational cost

    2.6 Conduct risk severity level assessment

    Assess IT Risks

    3.1 Conduct risk severity level assessment

    3.2 Document the proximity of the risk event

    3.3 Conduct expected cost assessment

    3.4 Develop key risk indicators (KRIs) and escalation protocols

    3.5 Perform root cause analysis

    3.6 Identify and assess risk responses

    Monitor, Report, and Respond to IT Risk

    4.1 Identify and assess risk responses

    4.2 Risk response cost-benefit analysis

    4.3 Create multi-year cost projections

    4.4 Review techniques for embedding risk management in IT

    4.5 Finalize the Risk Report and Risk Management Program Manual

    4.6 Transfer ownership of risk responses to project managers

    Next Steps and Wrap-Up (offsite)

    5.1 Complete in-progress deliverables from previous four days

    5.2 Set up review time for workshop deliverables and to discuss next steps

    Outcomes
    1. Maturity Assessment
    2. Risk Management Program Manual
    1. Finalized List of IT Risk Events
    2. Risk Register
    3. Risk Management Program Manual
    1. Risk Register
    2. Risk Event Action Plans
    3. Risk Management Program Manual
    1. Risk Report
    2. Risk Management Program Manual
    1. Workshop Report
    2. Risk Management Program Manual

    Build an IT Risk Management Program

    Phase 1

    Review IT Risk Fundamentals and Governance

    Phase 1

    • 1.1 Review IT Risk Management Fundamentals
    • 1.2 Establish a Risk Governance Framework

    Phase 2

    • 2.1 Identify IT Risks
    • 2.2 Assess and Prioritize IT Risks

    Phase 3

    • 3.1 Develop Risk Responses and Monitor IT Risks
    • 3.2 Report IT Risk Priorities

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Gain buy-in from senior leadership
    • Assess current program maturity
    • Identify obstacles and pain points
    • Determine the risk culture of the organization
    • Develop risk management goals
    • Develop SMART project metrics
    • Create the IT risk council
    • Complete a RACI chart

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • IT executive leadership
    • Business executive leadership

    Step 1.1

    Review IT Risk Management Fundamentals

    Activities
    • 1.1.1 Gain buy-in from senior leadership
    • 1.1.2 Assess current program maturity

    This step involves the following participants:

    • IT executive leadership
    • Business executive leadership

    Outcomes of this step

    • Reviewed key IT principles and terminology
    • Gained understanding of the relationship between IT risk management and ERM
    • Introduced to Info-Tech’s IT Risk Management Framework
    • Obtained the support of senior leadership
    Step 1.1 Step 1.2

    Effective IT risk management is possible with or without ERM

    Whether or not your organization has ERM, integrating your IT risk management program with the business is possible.

    Most IT departments find themselves in one of these two organizational frameworks for managing IT risk:

    Core Responsibilities With an ERM Without an ERM
    • Risk Decision-Making Authority
    • Final Accountability
    Senior Leadership Team Senior Leadership Team
    • Risk Governance
    • Risk Prioritization & Communication
    ERM IT Risk Management
    • Risk Identification
    • Risk Assessment
    • Risk Monitoring
    IT Risk Management
    Pro: IT’s risk management responsibilities are defined (assessment schedules, escalation and reporting procedures).
    Con: IT may lack autonomy to implement IT risk management best practices.
    Pro: IT is free to create its own IT risk council and develop customized processes that serve its unique needs.
    Con: Lack of clear reporting procedures and mechanisms to share accountability with the business.

    Info-Tech’s IT risk management framework walks you through each step to achieve risk readiness

    IT Risk Management Framework

    Risk Governance
    • Optimize Risk Management Processes
    • Assess Risk Maturity
    • Measure the Success of the Program
    A cycle surrounds the words 'Business Objectives', referring to the surrounding lists. On the top half is 'Communication', and the bottom is 'Monitoring'. Risk Identification
    • Engage Stakeholder Participation
    • Use Risk Identification Frameworks
    • Compile IT-Related Risks
    Risk Response
    • Establish Monitoring Responsibilities
    • Perform Cost-Benefit Analysis
    • Report Risk Response Actions
    Risk Assessment
    • Establish Thresholds for Unacceptable Risk
    • Calculate Expected Cost
    • Determine Risk Severity & Prioritize IT Risks

    Effective IT risk management benefits

    Obtain the support of the senior leadership team or IT steering committee by communicating how IT risk impacts their priorities.

    Risk management benefits To engage the business...
    IT is compliant with external laws and regulations. Identify the industry or legal legislation and regulations your organization abides by.
    IT provides support for business compliance. Find relevant business compliance issues, and relate compliance failures to cost.
    IT regularly communicates costs, benefits, and risks to the business. Acknowledge the number of times IT and the business miscommunicate critical information.
    Information and processing infrastructure are very secure. Point to past security breaches or potential vulnerabilities in your systems.
    IT services are usually delivered in line with business requirements. Bring up IT services that the business was unsatisfied with. Explain that their inputs in identifying risks are correlated with project quality.
    IT related business risks are managed very well. Make it clear that with no risk tracking process, business processes become exposed and tend to slow down.
    IT projects are completed on time and within budget. Point out late or over-budget projects due to the occurrence of unforeseen risks.

    1.1.1 Gain buy-in from senior leadership

    1-4 hours

    Input: List of IT personnel and business stakeholders

    Output: Buy-in from senior leadership for an IT risk management program

    Materials: Risk Management Program Manual

    Participants: IT executive leadership, Business executive leadership

    The resource demands of IT risk management will vary from organization to organization. Here are typical requirements:

    • Occasional participation of key IT personnel and select business stakeholders in IT risk council meetings (e.g. once every two weeks).
    • Periodic risk assessments (e.g. 4 days, twice a year).
    • IT personnel must take on risk monitoring responsibilities (e.g. 1-4 hours per week).
    • Record the results in the Program Manual sections 3.3, 3.4 and 3.5.

    Record the results in the Risk Management Program Manual.

    Integrated Risk Maturity Assessment

    The purpose of the Integrated Risk Maturity Assessment is to assess the organization's current maturity and readiness for integrated risk management (IRM)

    Frequently and continually assessing your organization’s maturity toward integrated risk ensures the right risk management program can be adopted by your organization.

    Integrated Risk Maturity Assessment
    A simple tool to understand if your organization is ready to embrace integrated risk management by measuring maturity across four key categories: Context & Strategic Direction, Risk Culture & Authority, Risk Management Process, and Risk Program Optimization.
    Sample of the Integrated Risk Maturity Assessment deliverable.

    Use the results from this integrated risk maturity assessment to determine the type of risk management program that can and should be adopted by your organizations.

    Some organizations will need to remain siloed and focused on IT risk management only, while others will be able to integrate risk-related information to start enabling automatic controls that respond to this data.

    1.1.2 Assess current program maturity

    1-4 hours

    Input: List of IT personnel and business stakeholders

    Output: Maturity scores across four key risk categories

    Materials: Integrated Risk Maturity Assessment Tool

    Participants: IT executive leadership, Business executive leadership

    This assessment is intended for frequent use; process completeness should be re-evaluated on a regular basis.

    How to Use This Assessment:

    1. Download the Integrated Risk Management Maturity Assessment Tool.
    2. Tab 2, "Data Entry:" This is a qualitative assessment of your integrated risk management process and is organized by the categories of integrated risk maturity. You will be asked to rate the extent to which you are executing the activities required to successfully complete each phase of the assessment. Use the drop-down menus provided to select the appropriate level of execution for each activity listed.
    3. Tab 3, "Results:" This tab will display your rate of IRM completeness/maturity. You will receive a score for each category as well as an overall score. The results will be displayed numerically, by percentage, and graphically.

    Record the results in the Integrated Risk Maturity Assessment.

    Integrated Risk Maturity Categories

    Semi-circle with colored points indicating four categories.

    1

    Context & Strategic Direction Understanding of the organization’s main objectives and how risk can support or enhance those objectives.

    2

    Risk Culture and Authority Examine if risk-based decisions are being made by those with the right level of authority and if the organization’s risk appetite is embedded in the culture.

    3

    Risk Management Process Determine if the current process to identify, assess, respond to, monitor, and report on risks is benefitting the organization.

    4

    Risk Program Optimization Consider opportunities where risk-related data is being gathered, reported, and used to make informed decisions across the enterprise.

    Step 1.2

    Establish a Risk Governance Framework

    Activities
    • 1.2.1 Identify pain points/obstacles and opportunities
    • 1.2.2 Determine the risk culture of the organization
    • 1.2.3 Develop risk management goals
    • 1.2.4 Develop SMART project metrics
    • 1.2.5 Create the IT risk council
    • 1.2.6 Complete a RACI chart

    This step involves the following participants:

    • IT executive leadership
    • Business executive leadership

    Outcomes of this step

    • Developed goals for the risk management program
    • Established the IT risk council
    • Assigned accountability and responsibility for risk management processes

    Review IT Risk Fundamentals and Governance

    Step 1.1 Step 1.2

    Create an IT risk governance framework that integrates with the business

    Follow these best practices to make sure your requirements are solid:

    1. Self-assess your current approach to IT risk management.
    2. Identify organizational obstacles and set attainable risk management goals.
    3. Track the effectiveness and success of the program using SMART risk management metrics.
    4. Establish an IT risk council tasked with managing IT risk.
    5. Set clear risk management accountabilities and responsibilities for IT and business stakeholders.

    Key metrics for your IT risk governance framework

    Challenges:
    • Key stakeholders are left out or consulted once risks have already occurred.
    • Failure to employ consistent risk identification methodologies results in omitted and unknown risks.
    • Risk assessments do not reflect organizational priorities and may not align with thresholds for acceptable risk.
    • Risk assessment occurs sporadically or only after a major risk event has already occurred.
    Key metrics:
    • Number of risk management processes done ad hoc.
    • Frequency that IT risk appears as an agenda item at IT steering committee meetings.
    • Percentage of IT employees whose performance evaluations reflect risk management objectives.
    • Percentage of IT risk council members who are trained in risk management activities.
    • Number of open positions in the IT risk council.
    • Cost of risk management program operations per year.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Metrics provide the foundation for determining the success of your IT risk management program and ensure ongoing funding to support appropriate risk responses.

    IT risk management success factors

    Support and sponsorship from senior leadership

    IT risk management has more success when initiated by a member of the senior leadership team or the board, rather than emerging from IT as a grassroots initiative.

    Sponsorship increases the likelihood that risk management is prioritized and receives the necessary resources and attention. It also ensures that IT risk accountability is assumed by senior leadership.

    Risk culture and awareness

    A risk-aware organizational culture embraces new policies and processes that reflect a proactive approach to risk.

    An organization with a risk-aware culture is better equipped to facilitate communication vertically within the organization.

    Risk awareness can be embedded by revising job descriptions and performance assessments to reflect IT risk management responsibilities.

    Organization size

    Smaller organizations can often institute a mature risk management program much more quickly than larger organizations.

    It is common for key personnel within smaller organizations to be responsible for multiple roles associated with risk management, making it easier to integrate IT and business risk management.

    Larger organizations may find it more difficult to integrate a more complex and dispersed network of individuals responsible for various risk management responsibilities.

    1.2.1 Identify obstacles and pain points

    1-4 hours

    Input: Integrated Risk Maturity Assessment

    Output: Obstacles and pain points identified

    Materials: IT Risk Management Success Factors

    Participants: IT executive leadership, Business executive leadership

    Anticipate potential challenges and “blind spots” by determining which success factors are missing from your current situation.

    Instructions:

    1. List the potential obstacles and missing success factors that you must overcome to effectively manage IT risk and build a risk management program.
    2. Consider some opportunities that could be leveraged to increase the success of this program.
    3. Use this list in Activity 1.2.3 to develop program goals.

    Risk Management

    Replace the example pain points and opportunities with real scenarios in your organization.

    Pain Points/Obstacles
    • Lack of leadership buy-in
    • Skills and understanding around risk management within IT
    • Skills and understanding around risk management within the organization
    • Lack of a defined risk management posture
    Opportunities
    • Changes in regulations related to risk
    • Organization moving toward an integrated risk management program
    • Ability to leverage lessons learned from similar companies
    • Strong process management and adherence to policies by employees in the organization

    1.2.2 Determine the risk culture of your organization

    1-3 hours

    Determine how your organization fits the criteria listed below. Descriptions and examples do not have to match your organization perfectly.

    Risk Tolerant
    • You have no compliance requirements.
    • You have no sensitive data.
    • Customers do not expect you to have strong security controls.
    • Revenue generation and innovative products take priority and risk is acceptable.
    • The organization does not have remote locations.
    • It is likely that your organization does not operate within the following industries:
      • Finance
      • Health care
      • Telecom
      • Government
      • Research
      • Education
    Moderate
    • You have some compliance requirements, e.g.:
      • HIPAA
      • PIPEDA
    • You have sensitive data, and are required to retain records.
    • Customers expect strong security controls.
    • Information security is visible to senior leadership.
    • The organization has some remote locations.
    • Your organization most likely operates within the following industries:
      • Government
      • Research
      • Education
    Risk Averse
    • You have multiple, strict compliance and/or regulatory requirements.
    • You house sensitive data, such as medical records.
    • Customers expect your organization to maintain strong and current security controls.
    • Information security is highly visible to senior management and public investors.
    • The organization has multiple remote locations.
    • Your organization operates within the following industries:
      • Finance
      • Healthcare
      • Telecom

    Be aware of the organization’s attitude towards risk

    Risk culture is an organization’s attitude towards taking risks. This attitude manifests itself in two ways:

    One element of risk culture is what levels of risk the organization is willing to accept to pursue its objectives and what levels of risk are deemed unacceptable. This is often called risk appetite.
    Risk tolerant

    Risk-tolerant organizations embrace the potential of accelerating growth and the attainment of business objectives by taking calculated risks.

    Risk averse

    Risk-averse organizations prefer consistent, gradual growth and goal attainment by embracing a more cautious stance toward risk.

    The other component of risk culture is the degree to which risk factors into decision making.
    Risk conscious

    Risk-conscious organizations place a high priority on being aware of all risks impacting business objectives, regardless of whether they choose to accept or respond to those risks.

    Unaware

    Organizations that are largely unaware of the impact of risk generally believe there are few major risks impacting business objectives and choose to invest resources elsewhere.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Organizations typically fall in the middle of these spectrums. While risk culture will vary depending on the industry and maturity of the organization, a culture with a balanced risk appetite that is extremely risk conscious is able to make creative, dynamic decisions with reasonable limits placed on risk-related decision making.

    1.2.3 Develop goals for the IT risk management program

    1-4 hours

    Input: Integrated Risk Maturity Assessment, Risk Culture, Pain Points and Opportunities

    Output: Goals for the IT risk management program

    Materials: Risk Management Program Manual

    Participants: IT executive leadership, Business executive leadership

    Translate your maturity assessment and knowledge about organizational risk culture, potential obstacles, and success factors to develop goals for your IT risk management program.

    Instructions:

    1. In the Risk Management Program Manual, revise, replace, or add to the high-level goals provided in section 2.4.
    2. Make sure that you have three to five high-level goals that reflect the current and targeted maturity of IT risk management processes.
    3. Integrate potential obstacles, pain points, and insights from the organization’s risk culture.

    Record the results in the Risk Management Program Manual.

    1.2.4 Develop SMART project metrics

    1-3 hours

    Create metrics for measuring the success of the IT risk management program.

    Ensure that all success metrics are SMART Instructions
    1. Document a list of appropriate metrics to assess the success of the IT risk management program on a whiteboard.
    2. Use the sample metrics listed in the table on the next slide as a starting point.
    3. Fill in the chart to indicate the:
      1. Name of the success metric
      2. Method for measuring success
      3. Baseline measurement
      4. Target measurement
      5. Actual measurements at various points throughout the process of improving the risk management program
      6. A deadline for each metric to meet the target measurement
    Strong Make sure the objective is clear and detailed.
    Measurable Objectives are measurable if there are specific metrics assigned to measure success. Metrics should be objective.
    Actionable Objectives become actionable when specific initiatives designed to achieve the objective are identified.
    Realistic Objectives must be achievable given your current resources or known available resources.
    Time-Bound An objective without a timeline can be put off indefinitely. Furthermore, measuring success is challenging without a timeline.

    1.2.4 Develop SMART project metrics (continued)

    1-3 hours

    Attach metrics to your goals to gauge the success of the IT risk management program.

    Replace the example metrics with accurate KPIs or metrics for your organization.

    Sample Metrics
    Name Method Baseline Target Deadline Checkpoint 1 Checkpoint 2 Final
    Number of risks identified (per year) Risk register 0 100 Dec. 31
    Number of business units represented (risk identification) Meeting minutes 0 5 Dec. 31
    Frequency of risk assessment Assessments recorded in risk management program manual 0 2 per year Year 2
    Percentage of identified risk events that undergo expected cost assessment Ratio of risks assessed in the risk costing tool to risks assessed in the risk register 0 20% Dec. 31
    Number of top risks without an identified risk response Risk register 5 0 March 1
    Cost of risk management program operations per year Meeting frequency and duration, multiplied by the cost of participation $2,000 $5,000 Dec. 31

    Create the IT risk committee (ITRC)

    Responsibilities of the ITRC:
    1. Formalize risk management processes.
    2. Identify and review major risks throughout the IT department.
    3. Recommend an appropriate risk appetite or level of exposure.
    4. Review the assessment of the impact and likelihood of identified risks.
    5. Review the prioritized list of risks.
    6. Create a mitigation plan to minimize risk likelihood and impact.
    7. Review and communicate overall risk impact and risk management success.
    8. Assign risk ownership responsibilities of key risks to ensure key risks are monitored and risk responses are effectively implemented.
    9. Address any concerns in regards to the risk management program, including, but not limited to, reviewing their risk management duties and resourcing.
    10. Communicate risk reports to senior management annually.
    11. Make any alterations to the committee roster and the individuals’ responsibilities as needed and document changes.
    Must be on the ITRC:
    • CIO
    • CRO (if applicable)
    • Senior Directors
    • Security Officer
    • Head of Operations

    Must be on the ITRC:

    • CFO
    • Senior representation from every business unit impacted by IT risk

    1.2.5 Create the IT risk council

    1-4 hours

    Input: List of IT personnel and business stakeholders

    Output: Goals for the IT risk management program

    Materials: Risk Management Program Manual

    Participants: CIO, CRO (if applicable), Senior Directors, Head of Operations

    Identify the essential individuals from both the IT department and the business to create a permanent committee that meets regularly and carries out IT risk management activities.

    Instructions:

    1. Review sections 3.1 (Mandate) and 3.2 (Agenda and Responsibilities) of the IT Risk Committee Charter, located in the Risk Management Program Manual. Make any necessary revisions.
    2. In section 3.3, document how frequently the council is scheduled to meet.
    3. In section 3.4, document members of the IT risk council.
    4. Obtain sign-off for the IT risk council from the CIO or another member of the senior leadership team in section 3.5 of the manual.

    Record the results in the Risk Management Program Manual.

    1.2.6 Complete RACI chart

    1-3 hours

    A RACI diagram is a useful visualization that identifies redundancies and ensures that every role, project, or task has an accountable party.

    RACI is an acronym made up of four participatory roles: Instructions
    1. Use the template provided on the following slide, and add key stakeholders who do not appear and are relevant for your organization.
    2. For each activity, assign each stakeholder a letter.
    3. There must be an accountable party for each activity (every activity must have an “A”).
    4. For activities that do not apply to a particular stakeholder, leave the space blank.
    5. Once the chart is complete, copy/paste it into section 4.1 of the Risk Management Program Manual.
    Responsible Stakeholders who undertake the activity.
    Accountable Stakeholders who are held responsible for failure or take credit for success.
    Consulted Stakeholders whose opinions are sought.
    Informed Stakeholders who receive updates.

    1.2.6 Complete RACI chart (continued)

    1-3 hours

    Assign risk management accountabilities and responsibilities to key stakeholders:

    Stakeholder Coordination Risk Identification Risk Thresholds Risk Assessment Identify Responses Cost-Benefit Analysis Monitoring Risk Decision Making
    ITRC A R I R R R A C
    ERM C I C I I I I C
    CIO I A A A A A I R
    CRO I R C I R
    CFO I R C I R
    CEO I R C I A
    Business Units I C C C
    IT I I I I I I R C
    PMO C C C
    Legend: Responsible Accountable Consulted Informed

    Build an IT Risk Management Program

    Phase 2

    Identify and Assess IT Risk

    Phase 1

    • 1.1 Review IT Risk Management Fundamentals
    • 1.2 Establish a Risk Governance Framework

    Phase 2

    • 2.1 Identify IT Risks
    • 2.2 Assess and Prioritize IT Risks

    Phase 3

    • 3.1 Develop Risk Responses and Monitor IT Risks
    • 3.2 Report IT Risk Priorities

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Add organization-specific risk scenarios
    • Identify risk events
    • Augment risk event list using COBIT 2019 processes
    • Conduct a PESTLE analysis
    • Determine the threshold for (un)acceptable risk
    • Create a financial impact assessment scale
    • Select a technique to measure reputational cost
    • Create a likelihood scale
    • Assess risk severity level
    • Assess expected cost

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • IT risk council
    • Relevant business stakeholders
    • Representation from senior management team
    • Business Risk Owners

    Step 2.1

    Identify IT Risks

    Activities
    • 2.1.1 Add organization-specific risk scenarios
    • 2.1.2 Identify risk events
    • 2.1.3 Augment risk event list using COBIT 19 processes
    • 2.1.4 Conduct a PESTLE analysis

    This step involves the following participants:

    • IT executive leadership
    • IT Risk Council
    • Business executive leadership
    • Business risk owners

    Outcomes of this step

    • Participation of key stakeholders
    • Comprehensive list of IT risk events
    Identify and Assess IT Risk
    Step 2.1 Step 2.2

    Get to know what you don’t know

    1. Engage the right stakeholders in risk identification.
    2. Employ Info-Tech’s top-down approach to risk identification.
    3. Augment your risk event list using alternative frameworks.
    Key metrics:
    • Total risks identified
    • New risks identified
    • Frequency of updates to the Risk Register Tool
    • Number of realized risk events not identified in the Risk Register Tool
    • Level of business participation in enterprise IT risk identification
      • Number of business units represented
      • Number of meetings attended in person
      • Number of risk reports received

    Info-Tech Insight

    What you don’t know CAN hurt you. How do you identify IT-related threats and vulnerabilities that you are not already aware of? Now that you have created a strong risk governance framework that formalizes risk management within IT and connects it to the enterprise, follow the steps outlined in this section to reveal all of IT’s risks.

    Engage key stakeholders

    Ensure that all key risks are identified by engaging key business stakeholders.

    Benefits of obtaining business involvement during the risk identification stage:
    • You will identify risk events you had not considered or you weren’t aware of.
    • You will identify risks more accurately.
    • Risk identification is an opportunity to raise awareness of IT risk management early in the process.

    Executive Participation:

    • CIO participation is integral when building a comprehensive register of risk events impacting IT.
    • CIOs and IT directors possess a holistic view of all of IT’s functions.
    • CIOs and IT directors are uniquely placed to identify how IT affects other business units and the attainment of business objectives. If applicable, CRO and CTO participation is also critical.

    Prioritizing and Selecting Stakeholders

    1. Reliance on IT services and technologies to achieve business objectives.
    2. Relationship with IT, and willingness to engage in risk management activities.
    3. Unique perspectives, skills, and experiences that IT may not possess.

    Info-Tech Insight

    While IT personnel are better equipped to identify IT risk than anyone, IT does not always have an accurate view of the business’ exposure to IT risk. Strive to maintain a 3 to 1 ratio of IT to non-IT personnel involved in the process.

    Enable IT to target risk holistically

    Take a top-down approach to risk identification to guide brainstorming

    Info-Tech’s risk categories are consistent with a risk identification method called Risk Prompting.

    A risk prompt list is a list that categorizes risks into types or areas. The n10 risk categories encapsulate the services, activities, responsibilities, and functions of most IT departments. Use these categories and the example risk scenarios provided as prompts to guide brainstorming and organize risks.

    Risk Category: High-level groupings that describe risk pertaining to major IT functions. See the following slide for all ten of Info-Tech’s IT risk categories. Risk Scenario: An abstract profile representing common risk groups that are more specific than risk categories. Typically, organizations are able to identify two to five scenarios for each category. Risk Event: Specific threats and vulnerabilities that fall under a particular risk scenario. Organizations are able to identify anywhere between 1 and 20 events for each scenario. See the Appendix of the Risk Management Program Manual for a list of risk event examples.

    Risk Category

    Risk Scenario

    Risk Event

    Compliance Regulatory compliance Being fined for not complying/being aware of a new regulation.
    Externally originated attack Phishing attack on the organization.
    Operational Technology evaluation & selection Partnering with a vendor that is not in compliance with a key regulation.
    Capacity planning Not having sufficient resources to support a DRP.
    Third-Party Risk Vendor management Vendor performance requirements are improperly defined.
    Vendor selection Vendors are improperly selected to meet the defined use case.

    2.1.1 Add organization-specific risk scenarios

    1-3 hours

    Review Info-Tech’s ten IT risk categories and add risk scenarios to the examples provided.

    IT Reputational
    • Negative PR
    • Consumers writing negative reviews
    • Employees writing negative reviews
    IT Financial
    • Stock prices drop
    • Value of the organization is reduced
    IT Strategic
    • Organization prioritizes innovation but remains focused on operational
    • Unable to access data to support strategic initiative
    Operational
    • Enterprise architecture
    • Technology evaluation and selection
    • Capacity planning
    • Operational errors
    Availability
    • Power outage
    • Increased data workload
    • Single source of truth
    • Lacking knowledge transfer processes for critical tasks
    Performance
    • Network failure
    • Service levels not being met
    • Capacity overload
    Compliance
    • Regulatory compliance
    • Standards compliance
    • Audit compliance
    Security
    • Malware
    • Internally originated attack
    Third Party
    • Vendor selection
    • Vendor management
    • Contract termination
    Digital
    • No back-up process if automation fails

    2.1.2 Identify risk events

    1-4 hours

    Input: IT risk categories

    Output: Risk events identified and categorized

    Materials: Risk Register Tool

    Participants: IT risk council, Relevant business stakeholders, Representation from senior management team, Business risk owners, CRO (if applicable)

    Use Info-Tech’s IT risk categories and scenarios to brainstorm a comprehensive list of IT-related threats and vulnerabilities impacting your organization.

    Instructions:

    1. Document risk events in the Risk Register Tool.
    2. List risk scenarios (organized by risk category) in the Risk Events/Threats column.
    3. Disseminate the list to key stakeholders who were unable to participate and solicit their feedback.
      • Consult the RACI chart located in section 4.1 of the Risk Management Program Manual.
    4. Attack one scenario at a time, exhausting all realistic risk events for that grouping before moving onto the next scenario. Each scenario should take approximately 45-60 minutes.

    Tip: If disagreement arises regarding whether a specific risk event is relevant to the organization or not and it cannot be resolved quickly, include it in the list. The applicability of these risks will become apparent during the assessment process.

    Record the results in the Risk Register Tool.

    2.1.3 Augment the risk event list using COBIT 2019 processes (Optional)

    1-3 hours

    Other industry-leading frameworks provide alternative ways of conceptualizing the functions and responsibilities of IT and may help you uncover additional risk events.

    1. Managed IT Management Framework
    2. Managed Strategy
    3. Managed Enterprise Architecture
    4. Managed Innovation
    5. Managed Portfolio
    6. Managed Budget and Costs
    7. Managed Human Resources
    8. Managed Relationships
    9. Managed Service Agreements
    10. Managed Vendors
    11. Managed Quality
    12. Managed Risk
    13. Managed Security
    14. Managed Data
    15. Managed Programs
    16. Managed Requirements Definition
    17. Managed Solutions Identification and Build
    18. Managed Availability and Capacity
    19. Managed Organizational Change Enablement
    20. Managed IT Changes
    1. Managed IT Change Acceptance and Transitioning
    2. Managed Knowledge
    3. Managed Assets
    4. Managed Configuration
    5. Managed Projects
    6. Managed Operations
    7. Managed Service Requests and Incidents
    8. Managed Problems
    9. Managed Continuity
    10. Managed Security Services
    11. Managed Business Process Controls
    12. Managed Performance and Conformance Monitoring
    13. Managed System of Internal Control
    14. Managed Compliance with External Requirements
    15. Managed Assurance
    16. Ensured Governance Framework Setting and Maintenance
    17. Ensured Benefits Delivery
    18. Ensured Risk Optimization
    19. Ensured Resource Optimization
    20. Ensured Stakeholder Engagement

    Instructions:

    1. Review COBIT 2019’s 40 IT processes and identify additional risk events.
    2. Match risk events to the corresponding risk category and scenario and add them to the Risk Register Tool.

    2.1.4 Finalize your risk register by conducting a PESTLE analysis (Optional)

    1-3 hours

    Explore alternative identification techniques to incorporate external factors and avoid “groupthink.”

    Consider the External Environment – PESTLE Analysis

    Despite efforts to encourage equal participation in the risk identification process, key risks may not have been shared in previous exercises.

    Conduct a PESTLE analysis as a final safety net to ensure that all key risk events have been identified.

    Avoid “Groupthink” – Nominal Group Technique

    The Nominal Group Technique uses the silent generation of ideas and an enforced “safe” period of time where ideas are shared but not discussed to encourage judgement-free idea generation.

    • Ideas are generated silently and independently.
    • Ideas are then shared and documented; however, discussion is delayed until all of the group’s ideas have been recorded.
    • Idea generation can occur before the meeting and be kept anonymous.

    Note: Employing either of these techniques will lengthen an already time-consuming process. Only consider these techniques if you have concerns regarding the homogeneity of the ideas being generated or if select individuals are dominating the exercise.

    List the following factors influencing the risk event:
    • Political factors
    • Economic factors
    • Social factors
    • Technological factors
    • Legal factors
    • Environmental factors
    'PESTLE Analysis' presented as a wheel with the acronym's meanings surrounding the title. 'Political Factors', 'Economic Factors', 'Social Factors', 'Technological Factors', 'Legal Factors', and 'Environmental Factors'.

    Step 2.2

    Assess and Prioritize IT Risks

    Activities
    • 2.2.1 Determine the threshold for (un)acceptable risk
    • 2.2.2 Create a financial impact assessment scale
    • 2.2.3 Select a technique to measure reputational cost
    • 2.2.4 Create a likelihood scale
    • 2.2.5 Risk severity level assessment
    • 2.2.6 Expected cost assessment

    This step involves the following participants:

    • IT risk council
    • Relevant business stakeholders
    • Representation from senior management team
    • Business risk owners

    Outcomes of this step

    • Business-approved thresholds for unacceptable risk
    • Completed Risk Register Tool with risks prioritized according to severity
    • Expected cost calculations for high-priority risks

    Identify and Assess IT Risk

    Step 2.1 Step 2.2

    Reveal the organization’s greatest IT threats and vulnerabilities

    1. Establish business-approved risk thresholds for acceptable and unacceptable risk.
    2. Conduct a streamlined assessment of all risks to separate acceptable and unacceptable risks.
    3. Perform a deeper, cost-based assessment of prioritized risks.
    Key metrics:
    • Frequency of IT risk assessments
      • (Annually, bi-annually, etc.)
    • Assessment accuracy
      • Percentage of risk assessments that are substantiated by later occurrences or testing
      • Ratio of cumulative actual costs to expected costs
    • Assessment consistency
      • Percentage of risk assessments that are substantiated by third-party audit
    • Assessment rigor
      • Percentage of identified risk events that undergo first-level assessment (severity scores)
      • Percentage of identified risk events that undergo second-level assessment (expected cost)
    • Stakeholder oversight and participation
      • Level of executive participation in IT risk assessment (attend in person, receive report, etc.)
      • Number of business stakeholder reviews per risk assessment

    Info-Tech Insight

    Risk is money. It’s impossible to make intelligent decisions about risks without knowing what their financial impact will be.

    Review risk assessment fundamentals

    Risk assessment provides you with the raw materials to conduct an informed cost-benefit analysis and make robust risk response decisions.

    In this section, you will be prioritizing your IT risks according to their risk severity, which is a reflection of their expected cost.

    Calculating risk severity

    How much you expect a risk event to cost if it were to occur:

    Likelihood of Risk Impact

    e.g. $250,000 or “High”

    X

    Calibrated by how likely the risk is to occur:

    Likelihood of Risk Occurrence

    e.g. 10% or “Low”

    =

    Produces a dollar value or “severity level” for comparing risks:

    Risk Severity

    e.g. $25,000 or “Medium”
    Which must be evaluated against thresholds for acceptable risk and the cost of risk responses.

    Risk Tolerance
    Risk Response

    CBA
    Cost-benefit analysis

    Maintain the engagement of key stakeholders in the risk assessment process

    1

    Engage the Business During Assessment Process

    Asking business stakeholders to make significant contributions to the assessment exercise may be unrealistic (particularly for members of the senior leadership team, other than the CIO).

    Ensure that they work with you to finalize thresholds for acceptable or unacceptable risk.

    2

    Verify the Risk Impact and Assessment

    If IT has ranked risk events appropriately, the business will be more likely to offer their input. Share impact and likelihood values for key risks to see if they agree with the calculated risk severity scores.

    3

    Identify Where the Business Focuses Attention

    While verifying, pay attention to the risk events that the business stresses as key risks. Keep these risks in mind when prioritizing risk responses as they are more likely to receive funding.

    Try to communicate the assessments of these risk events in terms of expected cost to attract the attention of business leaders.

    Info-Tech Insight

    If business executives still won’t provide the necessary information to update your initial risk assessments, IT should approach business unit leaders and lower-level management. Lean on strong relationships forged over time between IT and business managers or supervisors to obtain any additional information.

    Info-Tech recommends a two-level approach to risk assessment

    Review the two levels of risk assessment offered in this blueprint.

    Risk severity level assessment (mandatory)

    1

    Information

    Number of risks: Assess all risk events identified in Phase 1.
    Units of measurement: Use customized likelihood and impact “levels.”
    Time required: One to five minutes per risk event.

    Assess Likelihood

    Negligible
    Low
    Moderate
    High
    Very High

    X

    Assess Likelihood

    Negligible
    Low
    Moderate
    High
    Very High

    =

    Output


    Risk Security Level:

    Moderate

    Example of a risk severity level assessment chart.
    Chart risk events according to risk severity as this allows you to organize and prioritize IT risks.

    Assess all of your identified risk events with a risk severity-level assessment.

    • By creating a likelihood and impact assessment scale divided into three to nine “levels” (sometimes referred to as “buckets”), you can evaluate every risk event quickly while being confident that risks are being assessed accurately.
    • In the following activities, you will create likelihood and impact scales that align with your organizational risk appetite and tolerance.
    • Severity-level assessment is a “first pass” of your risk list, revealing your organization’s most severe IT risks, which can be assessed in greater detail by incorporating expected cost into your evaluation.

    Info-Tech recommends a two-level approach to risk assessment (continued)

    Expected cost assessment (optional)

    2

    Information

    Number of risks: Only assess high-priority risks revealed by severity-level assessment.
    Units of measurement: Use actual likelihood values (%) and impact costs ($).
    Time required: 10-20 minutes per risk event.

    Assess Likelihood

    15%

    Moderate

    X

    Assess Likelihood

    $100,000

    High

    =

    Output


    Expected Cost:

    $15,000

    Expected cost is useful for conducting cost-benefit analysis and comparing IT risks to non-IT risks and other budget priorities for the business.

    Conduct expected cost assessments for IT’s greatest risks.

    For risk events warranting further analysis, translate risk severity levels into hard expected-cost numbers.

    Why conduct expected cost assessments?
    • Expected cost represents how much you would expect to pay in an average year for each risk event.
    • Communicate risk priorities to the business in language they can understand.
    • While risk severity levels are useful for comparing one IT risk to another, expected cost data allows the business to compare IT risks to non-IT risks that may not use the same scales.
    Why is expected cost assessment optional?
    • Determining robust likelihood values and precise impact estimates can be challenging and time consuming.
    • Some risk events may require extensive data gathering and industry analysis.

    Implement and leverage a centralized risk register

    The purpose of the risk register is to act as the repository for all the risks that have been identified within your environment.

    Use this tool to:

    1. Collect and maintain a repository for all IT risk events impacting the organization and relevant information for each risk.
      • Capture all relevant IT risk information in one location.
      • Organize risk identification and assessment information for transparent risk management, stakeholder review, and/or internal audit.
    2. Calculate risk severity scores to prioritize risk events and determine which risks require a risk response.
      • Separate acceptable and unacceptable risks (as determined by the business).
      • Rank risks based on severity levels.
    3. Assess risk responses and calculate residual risk.
      • Evaluate the effect that proposed risk response actions will have on top risk events and quantify residual risk magnitude.
      • This step will be completed in section 3.1

    2.2.1 Determine the threshold for (un)acceptable risk

    1-4 hours

    Input: Risk events, Risk appetite

    Output: Threshold for risk identified

    Materials: Risk Register Tool, Risk Management Program Manual

    Participants: IT risk council, Relevant business stakeholders, Representation from senior management team, Business risk owner

    Instructions:

    There are times when the business needs to know about IT risks with high expected costs.

    1. Create an expected cost threshold that defines what constitutes an acceptable and unacceptable risk for the organization. This figure should be a concrete dollar value. In the next exercises, you will build risk impact and likelihood scales with this value in mind, ensuring that “high” or “extreme” risks are immediately communicated to senior leadership.
    2. Do not consider IT budget restrictions when developing this number. The acceptable risk threshold should reflect the business’ tolerance/appetite for risk.

    This threshold is typically based on the organization’s ability to absorb financial losses, and its tolerance/appetite towards risk.

    If your organization has ERM, adopt the existing acceptability threshold.

    Record this threshold in section 5.3 of the Risk Management Program Manual

    2.2.2 Create a financial impact assessment scale

    1-4 hours

    Input: Risk events, Risk threshold

    Output: Financial impact scale created

    Materials: Risk Register Tool, Risk Management Program Manual

    Participants: IT risk council, Relevant business stakeholders, Representation from senior management team, Business risk owner

    Instructions:

    1. Create a scale to assess the financial impact of risk events.
      • Typically, risk impacts are assessed on a scale of 1-5; however, some organizations may prefer to assess risks using 3, 4, 7, or 9-point scales.
    2. Ensure that the unacceptable risk threshold is reflected in the scale.
      • In the example provided, the unacceptable risk threshold ($100,000) is represented as “High” on the impact scale.
    3. Attach labels to each point on the scale. Effective labels will easily distinguish between risks on either side of the unacceptable risk threshold.

    Record the risk impact scale in section 5.3 of the Risk Management Program Manual

    Convert project overruns and service outages into costs

    Use the tables below to quickly convert impacts typically measured in units of time to financial cost. Replace the values in the table with those that reflect your own costs.

    • While project overruns and service outages may have intangible impacts beyond the unexpected costs stemming from paying employees and lost revenue (such as adding complexity to project management and undermining the business’ confidence in IT), these measurements will provide adequate impact estimations for risk assessment.
    • Remember, complex risk events can be analyzed further with an expected cost assessment.
    Project Overruns Scale for the use of cost assessment with dollar amounts associated with impact levels. '$250,000 - Extreme', '$100,000 - High', '$60,000 - Moderate', '$35,000 - Low', '$10,000 - Negligible'.

    Project

    Time (days)

    20 days

    Number of employees

    8

    Average cost per employee (per day)

    $300

    Estimated cost

    $48,000
    Service Outages

    Service

    Time (hours)

    4 hours

    Lost revenue (per hour)

    $10,000

    Estimated cost

    $40,000

    Impact scale

    Low

    2.2.3 Select a technique to measure reputational cost (1 of 3)

    1-3 hours

    Realized risk events may have profound reputational costs that do not immediately impact your bottom line.

    Reputational cost can take several forms, including the internal and external perception of:
    1. Brand likeability
    2. Product quality
    3. Leadership capability
    4. Social responsibility

    Based on your industry and the nature of the risk, select one of the three techniques described in this section to incorporate reputational costs into your risk assessment.

    Technique #1 – Use financial indicators:

    For-profit companies typically experience reputational loss as a gradual decline in the strength of their brand, exclusion from industry groups, or lost revenue.

    If possible, use these measures to put a price on reputational loss:

    • Lost revenue attributable to reputation loss
    • Loss of market share attributable to reputation loss
    • Drops in share price attributable to reputation loss (for public companies)

    Match this dollar value to the corresponding level on the impact scale created in Activity 2.2.2.

    • If you are not able to effectively translate all reputational costs into financial costs, proceed to techniques 2 and 3 on the following slides.

    2.2.3 Select a technique to measure reputational cost (2 of 3)

    1-3 hours
    It is common for public sector or not-for-profit organizations to have difficulty putting a price tag on intangible reputational costs.
    • For example, a government organization may be unable to directly quantify the cost of losing the confidence and/or support of the public.
    • A helpful technique is to reframe how reputation is assigned value.
    Technique #2 – Calculate the value of avoiding reputational cost:
    1. Imagine that the particular risk event you are assessing has occurred. Describe the resulting reputational cost using qualitative language.

    For example:

    A data breach, which caused the unsanctioned disclosure of 2,000 client files, has inflicted high reputational costs on the organization. These have impacted the organization in the following ways:

    • Loss of organizational trust in IT
    • IT’s reputation as a value provider to the organization is tarnished
    • Loss of client trust in the organization
    • Potential for a public reprimand of the organization by the government to restore public trust
  • Then, determine (hypothetically) how much money the organization would be willing to spend to prevent the reputational cost from being incurred.
  • Match this dollar value to the corresponding level on the impact scale created in Activity 2.2.2.
  • 2.2.3 Select a technique to measure reputational cost (3 of 3)

    1-3 hours

    If you feel that the other techniques have not reflected reputational impacts in the overall severity level of the risk, create a parallel scale that roughly matches your financial impact scale.

    Technique #3 – Create a parallel scale for reputational impact:

    Visibility is a useful metric for measuring reputational impact. Visibility measures how widely knowledge of the risk event has spread and how negatively the organization is perceived. Visibility has two main dimensions:

    • Internal vs. External
    • Low Amplification vs. High Amplification
    • Internal/External: The further outside of the organization that the risk event is visible, the higher the reputational impact.
      Low/High Amplification: The greater the ability of the actor to communicate and amplify the occurrence of a risk event, the higher the reputational impact.
      After establishing a scale for reputational impact, test whether it reflects the severity of the financial impact levels in the financial impact scale.

    • For example, if the media learns about a recent data breach, does that feel like a $100,000 loss?
    Example:
    Scale for the use of cost assessment  of reputational impact with dimension combinations associated with impact levels. 'External, High Amp, (regulators, lawsuits) - Extreme', 'Internal, High Amp, (CEO) - Low', 'Internal, Low Amp (IT) - Negligible'.

    2.2.4 Create a likelihood scale

    1-3 hours

    Instructions:
    1. Create a scale to assess the likelihood that a risk event will occur over a given period of time.
      • Info-Tech recommends assessing the likelihood that the risk event will occur over a period of one year (the IT risk council should be reassessing the risk event no less than once per year).
    2. Ensure that the likelihood scale contains the same number of levels as the financial impact scale (3, 4, 5, 7, or 9).
    3. The example provided is likely to satisfy most IT departments; however, you may customize the distribution of likelihood values to reflect the organization’s aversion towards uncertainty.
      • For example, an extremely risk-averse organization may consider any risk event with a likelihood greater than 20% to have a “High” likelihood of occurrence.
    4. Attach the same labels used for the financial impact scale (Low, Moderate, High, etc.)

    Record the risk impact scale in section 5.3 of the Risk Management Program Manual

    Scale to assess the likelihood that a risk event will occur. '80-99% - Extreme', '60-79% - High', '40-59% - Moderate' '20-39% - Low', '1-19% - Negligible'.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Note: Info-Tech endorses the use of likelihood values (1-99%) rather than frequency (3 times per year) as a measurement.
    For an explanation of why likelihood values lead to more precise and robust risk assessment, see the Appendix.

    2.2.5 Risk severity level assessment

    6-10 hours

    Input: Risk events identified

    Output: Assessed the likelihood of occurrence and impact for all identified risk events

    Materials: Risk Register Tool

    Participants: IT risk council, Relevant business stakeholders, Representation from senior management team, Business risk owner

    Instructions:

    1. Document the “Risk Category” and “Existing Controls.” in the Risk Register Tool.
      • (See the slide following this activity for tips on identifying existing controls.)
    2. Assign each risk event a likelihood and impact level.
      • Remember, you are assessing the impact that a risk event will have on the organization as a whole, not just on IT.
    3. When assigning a financial impact level to a risk event, factor in the likely number of instances that the event will occur within the time frame for which you are assessing (usually one year).
      • For risk events like third-party service outages that typically occur a few times each year, assign them an impact level that reflects the likelihood of financial impact the risk event will have over the entire year.
      • E.g. If your organization is likely to experience two major service outages next year and each outage costs the organization approximately $15,000, the total financial impact is $30,000.

    Record results in the Risk Register Tool

    2.2.5 Risk severity level assessment (continued)

    Instructions (continued):
    1. Assign a risk owner to non-negligible risk events.
      • For organizations that practice ongoing risk management and frequently reassess their risk portfolio (minimum once per year), risk ownership does not need to be assigned to “Negligible” or low-level risks.
      • View the following slides for advice on how to select a risk owner and information on their responsibilities.
    2. As you input the first few likelihood and impact values, compare them to one another to ensure consistency and accuracy:
      • Is a service outage really twice as impactful as our primary software provider going out of business?
      • Is a data breach far more likely than a ›1 hour web-services outage?
    Tips for Selecting Likelihood Values:

    Does ~10% sound right?

    Test a likelihood estimate by assessing the truth of the following statements:

    • The risk event will likely occur once in the next ten years (if the environment remains nearly identical).
    • If ten organizations existed that were nearly identical to our own, it is likely that one out of ten would experience the risk event this year.

    Screenshot of a risk severity level assessment.

    Identify current risk controls

    Consider how IT is already addressing key risks.

    Types of current risk control

    Tactical controls

    Apply to individual risks only.

    Example: A tactical control for backup/replication failure is faster WAN lines.

    Tactical risk control Strategic controls

    Apply to multiple risks.

    Example: A strategic control for backup/replication failure is implementing formal DR plans.

    Strategic risk control
    Risk event Risk event Risk event

    Screenshot of the column headings on the risk severity level assessment with 'Current Controls' highlighted.
    Consider both tactical and strategic controls already in place when filling out risk event information in the Risk Register Tool.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Identifying existing risk controls (past risk responses) provides a clear picture of the measures already in place to avoid, mitigate, or transfer key risks. This reveals opportunities to improve existing risk controls, or where new strategies are needed, to reduce risk severity levels below business thresholds.

    Assign a risk owner for each risk event

    Designate a member of the IT risk council to be responsible for each risk event.

    Selecting the Appropriate Risk Owner

    Use the following considerations to determine the best owner for each risk:

    • The risk owner should be familiar with the process, project, or IT function related to the risk event.
    • The risk owner should have access to the necessary data to monitor and measure the severity of the risk event.
    • The risk owner’s performance assessment should reflect their ability to demonstrate the ongoing management of their assigned risk events.

    Screenshot of the column headings on the risk severity level assessment with 'Risk Owner' highlighted.

    Risk Owner Responsibilities

    Risk ownership means that an individual is responsible for the following activities:

    • Monitoring the threat or vulnerability for changes in the likelihood of occurrence and/or likely impact.
    • Monitoring changes in the market and external environment that may alter the severity of the risk event.
    • Monitoring changes of closely related risks with interdependencies.
    • Developing and using key risk indicators (KRIs) to measure changes in risk severity.
    • Regularly reporting changes in risk severity to the IT risk council.
    • If necessary, escalating the risk event to other IT risk council personnel or senior management for reassessment.
    • Monitoring risk severity levels for risk events after a risk response has been implemented.

    Use Info-Tech’s Risk Costing Tool to calculate the expected cost of IT’s high-priority risks (optional)

    Sample of the Risk Costing Tool.

    Use this tool to:

    1. Conduct a deeper analysis of severe risks.
      • Determine specific likelihood and financial impact values to communicate the severity of the risk in the Expected Cost tab.
      • Identify the maximum financial impact that the risk event may inflict.
    2. Assess the effectiveness of multiple risk responses for each risk event.
      • Determine how proposed risk events will change the likelihood of occurrence and financial impact of the risk event.
    3. Incorporate risk proximity into your cost-benefit analysis of risk responses.
      • Illustrate how spending decisions will impact the expected cost of the risk event over time.

    2.2.6 Expected cost assessment (optional)

    Assign likelihood and financial impact values to high-priority risks.

    Select risks with these characteristics:

    Strongly consider conducting an expected cost assessment for risk events that meet one or more of the following criteria.

    The risk:

    • Has been assigned to the highest risk severity level.
    • Has exposed the organization previously and had severe implications.
    • Exceeds the organization’s threshold for financial impact.
    • Involves an IT function that is highly visible to the business.
    • Will likely require risk response actions that will exceed current IT budgetary constraints.
    • Is conducive to expected cost assessment:
      • There is general consensus on likelihood estimates.
      • There is general consensus on financial impact estimates.
      • Historical data exists to support estimates.
    Determine which risks require a deeper assessment:

    Info-Tech recommends conducting a second-level assessment for 5-15% of your IT risk register.

    Communicating the expected cost of high-priority risks significantly increases awareness of IT risks by the business.

    Communicating risks to the business using their language also increases the likelihood that risk responses will receive the necessary support and investment


    Record the list of risk events requiring second-level assessment in the Risk Costing Tool.

    • Transfer the likelihood and impact levels for each event into the Risk Costing Tool using data from the Risk Register Tool.

    2.2.6 Expected cost assessment (continued)

    Assign likelihood and financial impact values to high-priority risks.

    Instructions:
    1. Go through the list of prioritized risks in the Risk Costing Tool one by one. Indicate the likelihood and impact level (from the Risk Register Tool) for the risk event being assessed.
    2. Record likelihood values (1-99%) and impact values ($) from participants.
      • Only record values from individuals that indicate they are fairly confident with their estimates.
      • Keep likelihood estimates to values that are multiples of five.
    3. Estimate and record the maximum impact that the risk event could inflict.
      • See Appendix III for information on how the possibility of high-impact scenarios may influence your decision making.
    4. Discuss the estimates provided. Eliminate outliers and retracted estimates.
      • If you are unable to achieve consensus, take the average of the values provided.
    5. If you are having difficulty arriving at a likelihood or impact value, select the median value of the level assigned to the risk during the risk severity level assessment.
      • E.g. Risk event assigned to likelihood level “Moderate” (20-39%). Select a likelihood value of 30%.

    Screenshot of the column headings on the risk severity level assessment with 'Optional Inherent Likelihood Parameters' and 'Optional Inherent Impact Parameters' highlighted.

    Who should participate?
    • Depending on the size of your IT risk council, you may want to consider conducting this exercise in a smaller group.
    • Ideally, you should try to find the right balance between ensuring that the necessary experience and knowledge is in the room while insulating the exercise from outlier opinions, noise, and distractions.

    Evaluate likelihood and impact

    Refine your risk assessment process by developing more accurate measurements of likelihood and impact.

    Intersubjective likelihood

    The goal of the expected cost assessment is to develop robust intersubjective estimates of likelihood and financial impact.

    By aggregating a number of expert opinions of what they deem to be the “correct” value, you will arrive at a collectively determined value that better reflects reality than an individual opinion.

    Example: The Delphi Method

    The Delphi Method is a common technique to produce a judgement that is representative of the collective opinion of a group.

    • Participants are sent a series of sequential questionnaires (typically by email).
    • The first questionnaire asks them what the likelihood, likely impact, and expected cost is for a specific risk event.
    • Data from the questionnaire is compiled and then communicated in a subsequent questionnaire, which encourages participants to restate or revise their estimates given the group’s judgements.
    • With each successive questionnaire, responses will typically converge around a single intersubjective value.
    Justifying Your Estimates:

    When asked to explain the numbers you arrived at during the risk assessment, pointing to an assessment methodology gives greater credibility to your estimates.

    • Assign one individual to take notes during the assessment exercise.
    • Have them document the main rationale behind each value and the level of consensus.

    Info-Tech Insight

    The underlying assumption behind intersubjective forecasting is that group judgements are more accurate than individual judgements. However, this may not be the case at all.

    Sometimes, a single expert opinion is more valuable than many uninformed opinions. Defining whose opinion is valuable and whose is not is an unpleasant exercise; therefore, selecting the right personnel to participate in the exercise is crucially important.

    Build an IT Risk Management Program

    Phase 3

    Monitor, Respond, and Report on IT Risk

    Phase 1

    • 1.1 Review IT Risk Management Fundamentals
    • 1.2 Establish a Risk Governance Framework

    Phase 2

    • 2.1 Identify IT Risks
    • 2.2 Assess and Prioritize IT Risks

    Phase 3

    • 3.1 Develop Risk Responses and Monitor IT Risks
    • 3.2 Report IT Risk Priorities

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Develop key risk indicators (KRIs) and escalation protocols
    • Establish the reporting schedule
    • Identify and assess risk responses
    • Analyze risk response cost-benefit
    • Create multi-year cost projections
    • Obtain executive approval for risk action plans
    • Socialize the Risk Report
    • Transfer ownership of risk responses to project managers
    • Finalize the Risk Management Program Manual

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • IT risk council
    • Relevant business stakeholders
    • Representation from senior management team
    • Risk business owner

    Step 3.1

    Monitor IT Risks and Develop Risk Responses

    Activities
    • 3.1.1 Develop key risk indicators (KRIs) and escalation protocols
    • 3.1.2 Establish the reporting schedule
    • 3.1.3 Identify and assess risk responses
    • 3.1.4 Risk response cost-benefit analysis
    • 3.1.5 Create multi-year cost projections

    This step involves the following participants:

    • IT risk council
    • Relevant business stakeholders
    • Representation from senior management team
    • Business risk owner

    Outcomes of this step

    • Completed risk event action plans
    • Risk responses identified and assessed for top risks
    • Risk response selected for top risks

    Monitor, Respond, and Report on IT Risk

    Step 3.1 Step 3.2

    Use Info-Tech’s Risk Event Action Plan to manage high-priority risks

    Manage risks in between risk assessments and create a paper trail for key risks that exceed the unacceptable risk threshold. Use a new form for every high-priority risk that requires tracking.

    Risk Event Action Plan Sample of the Risk Event Action Plan deliverable.

    Obtaining sign-off from the senior leadership team or from the ERM office is an important step of the risk management process. The Risk Event Action Plan ensures that high-priority risks are closely monitored and that changes in risk severity are detected and reported.

    Clear documentation is a way to ensure that critical information is shared with management so that they can make informed risk decisions. These reports should be succinct yet comprehensive; depending on time and resources, it is good practice to fill out this form and obtain sign-off for the majority of IT risks.

    3.1.1 Develop key risk indicators (KRIs) and escalation protocols

    The risk owner should be held accountable for monitoring their assigned risks but may delegate responsibility for these tasks.

    Instructions:
    1. Design key risk indicators (KRIs) for risks that measure changes in their severity and document them in the Risk Event Action Plan.
      • See the following slide for examples.
    2. Clearly document the risk owner and the individual(s) carrying out risk monitoring activities (delegates) in the Risk Event Action Plan.

    Note: Examples of KRIs can be found on the following slide.

    What are KRIs?
    • KRIs should be observable metrics that alert the IT risk council and management when risk severity exceeds acceptable risk thresholds.
    • KRIs should serve as tripwires or early-warning indicators that trigger further actions to be taken on the risk.
    • Further actions may include:
      • Escalation to the risk owner (if delegated) or to a member of the senior leadership team.
      • Reporting to the IT risk council or IT steering committee.
      • Reassessment.
      • Updating the risk monitoring schedule.

    Document KRIs, escalation thresholds, and escalation protocols for each risk in a Risk Event Action Plan.

    Developing KRIs for success

    Visualization of KRI development, from the 'Risk Event' to the 'Intermediate Steps' with 'KRI Measurements' to the image of a growing seed.

    Examples of KRIs

    • Number of resources who quit or were fired who had access to critical data
    • Number of risk mitigation initiatives unfunded
    • Changes in time horizon of mitigation implementation
    • Number of employees who did not report phishing attempts
    • Amount of time required to get critical operations access to necessary data
    • Number of days it takes to implement a new regulation or compliance control

    3.1.2 Establish the reporting schedule

    For each risk event, document how frequently the risk owner must report to the IT risk council in the Risk Event Action Plan.

    • A clear reporting schedule enforces accountability for each risk event, ensuring that risk owners are fulfilling their monitoring responsibilities.
    • The ongoing discussion of risks between assessment cycles also increases overall awareness of how IT risks are not static but constantly evolving.
    Reporting Risk Event
    Weekly reports to ITRC Risk event severity represented as a thermometer with levels 'Extreme', 'High', 'Moderate', 'Low', and 'Negligible'.
    Bi-weekly reports to ITRC
    Monthly reports to ITRC
    Report to ITRC only if KRI thresholds triggered
    No reports; reassessed bi-annually

    Use Info-Tech’s tools to identify, analyze, and select risk responses

    1

    (Mandatory)
    Tool

    Screenshot of the Risk Register Tool.

    Risk Register Tool

    Information
    • Develop risk responses for all risk events pre-populated on the “2. Risk Register” sheet of the Risk Register Tool.
    • Document the root cause of the risk (Activity 3.1.3) and other contributing factors (Activity 3.1.4).
    • Identify risk responses (Activity 3.1.5).
    • Predict the effectiveness of the risk response, if implemented, by estimating the residual likelihood and impact of the risk (Activity 3.1.5).
    • The tool will calculate the residual severity of the risk after applying the risk response.

    2

    (Optional)
    Tool

    Screenshot of the Risk Costing Tool.

    Risk Costing Tool

    Information
    • Continue your second-level risk analysis for top risks for which you calculated expected cost in section 2.2.
    • Activity 3.1.5:
      • Identify between one and four risk response options for each risk.
      • Develop precise values for residual likelihood and impact.
      • Compare expected cost of the risk event to expected residual cost.
      • Select the risk response to recommend to senior leadership and document it in the Risk Register Tool.

    Determine the root cause of IT risks

    Root cause analysis

    Use the “Five Whys” methodology to identify the root cause and contributing/exacerbating factors for each risk event.

    Diagnosing the root cause of a risk as well as the environmental factors that increase its potential impact and likelihood of occurring allow you to identify more effective risk responses.

    Risk responses that only address the symptoms of the risk are less likely to succeed than responses that address the core issue.

    Concentric circles with 'Root Cause' at the center, 'Contributing Factors' around it, and 'Symptoms' on the outer circle.

    Example of 'The Five Whys Methodology', tracing symptoms to their root cause. In 'Symptoms' we see 'Risk Event: Network outage', Why? 'Network congestion', Why? Then on to 'Contributing Factors' the answer is 'Inadequate bandwidth for latency-sensitive applications', Why? 'Increased business use of latency-sensitive applications', Why? And finally to the 'Root Cause', 'Business units rely on 'real-time' data gathered from latency-sensitive applications', Why?

    Identify factors that contribute to the severity of the risk

    Environmental factors interact with the root cause to increase the likelihood or impact of the risk event.

    What factors matter?

    Identify relevant actors and assets that amplify or diminish the severity of the risk.

    Actors

    • Internal (business units)
    • External (vendor, regulator, market, competitor, hostile actor)

    Assets/Resources

    • Infrastructure
    • Applications
    • Processes
    • Information/data
    • Personnel
    • Reputation
    • Operations
    Develop risk responses that target contributing factors.
    Root cause:
    Business units rely on “real-time” data gathered from latency-sensitive applications

    Actors: Enterprise App users (Finance, Product Development, Product Management)

    Asset/resource: Applications, network

    Risk response:
    Decrease the use of latency-sensitive applications.

    X

    Decreasing the use of key apps contradicts business objectives.

    Contributing factors:
    Unreliable router software

    Actors: Network provider, router vendor, router software vendor, IT department

    Asset/resource: Network, router, router software

    Risk response:
    Replace the vendor that provides routers and router software.

    Replacing the vendor would reduce network outages at a relatively low cost.

    Symptoms:
    Network outage

    Actors: All business units, network provider

    Asset/resource: Network, business operations, employee productivity

    Risk response:
    Replace legacy systems.

    X

    Replacing legacy systems would be too costly.

    3.1.3 Identify and assess risk responses

    Instructions:
    Complete the following steps for each risk event.
    1. Identify a risk response action that will help reduce the likelihood of occurrence or the impact if the event were to occur.
      • Indicate the type of risk response (avoidance, mitigation, transfer, acceptance, or no risk exists).
    2. Assign each risk response action a residual likelihood level and a residual impact level.
      • This is the same step performed in Activity 2.2.6, when initial likelihood and impact levels were determined; however, now you are estimating the likelihood and impact of the risk event after the risk response action has been implemented successfully.
      • The Risk Register Tool will generate a residual risk severity level for each risk event.
    3. Identify the potential Risk Action Owner (Project Manager) if the response is selected and turned into an IT project, and document this in the Risk Register Tool.
    Document the following in the Risk Event Action Plan for each risk event:
      • Risk response actions
      • Residual likelihood and impact levels
      • Residual risk severity level
    • Review the following slides about the four types of risk response to help complete the activity.
      1. Avoidance
      2. Mitigation
      3. Transfer
      4. Acceptance

    Record the results in the Risk Event Action Plan.

    Take actions to avoid the risk entirely

    Risk Avoidance

    • Risk avoidance involves taking evasive maneuvers to avoid the risk event.
    • Risk avoidance targets risk likelihood, decreasing the likelihood of the risk event occurring.
    • Since risk avoidance measures are fairly drastic, the likelihood is often reduced to negligible levels.
    • However, risk avoidance response actions often sacrifice potential benefits to eliminate the possibility of the risk entirely.
    • Typically, risk avoidance measures should only be taken for risk events with extremely high severity and when the severity (expected cost) of the risk event exceeds the cost (benefits sacrificed) of avoiding the risk.

    Example

    Risk event: Information security vulnerability from third-party cloud services provider.

    • Risk avoidance action: Store all data in-house.
    • Benefits sacrificed: Cost savings, storage flexibility, etc.
    Stock photo of a person hikiing along a damp, foggy, valley path.

    Pursue projects that reduce the likelihood or impact of the risk event

    Risk Mitigation

    • Risk mitigation actions are risk responses that reduce the likelihood and impact of the risk event.
    • Risk mitigation actions can be to either implement new controls or enhance existing ones.
    Example 1

    Most risk responses will reduce both the likelihood of the risk event occurring and its potential impact.

    Example

    Mitigation: Purchase and implement enterprise mobility management (EMM) software with remote wipe capability.

    • EMM reduces the likelihood that sensitive data is accessed by a nefarious actor.
    • The remote-wipe capability reduces the impact by closing the window that sensitive data can be accessed from.
    Example 2

    However, some risk responses will have a greater effect on decreasing the likelihood of a risk event with little effect on decreasing impact.

    Example

    Mitigation: Create policies that restrict which personnel can access sensitive data on mobile devices.

    • This mitigation decreases the number of corporate phones that have access to (or are storing) sensitive data, thereby decreasing the likelihood that a device is compromised.
    Example 3

    Others will reduce the potential impact without decreasing its likelihood of occurring.

    Example

    Mitigation: Use robust encryption for all sensitive data.

    • Corporate-issued mobile phones are just as likely to fall into the hands of nefarious actors, but the financial impact they can inflict on the organization is greatly reduced.

    Pursue projects that reduce the likelihood or impact of the risk event (continued)

    Use the following IT functions to guide your selection of risk mitigation actions:

    Process Improvement

    Key processes that would most directly improve the risk profile:

    • Change Management
    • Project Management
    • Vendor Management
    Infrastructure Management
    • Disaster Recovery Plan/Business Continuity Plan
    • Redundancy and Resilience
    • Preventative Maintenance
    • Physical Environment Security
    Personnel
    • Greater staff depth in key areas
    • Increased discipline around documentation
    • Knowledge Management
    • Training
    Rationalization and Simplification

    This is a foundational activity, as complexity is a major source of risk:

    • Application Rationalization – reducing the number of applications
    • Data Management – reducing the volume and locations of data

    Transfer risks to a third party

    Risk transfer: the exchange of uncertain future costs for fixed present costs.

    Insurance

    The most common form of risk transfer is the purchase of insurance.

    • The uncertain future cost of an IT risk event can be transferred to an insurance company who assumes the risk in exchange for insurance premiums.
    • The most common form of IT-relevant insurance is cyberinsurance.

    Not all risks can be insured. Insurable risks typically possess the following five characteristics:

    1. The loss must be accidental (the risk event cannot be insured if it could have been avoided by taking reasonable actions).
    2. The insured cannot profit from the occurrence of the risk event.
    3. The loss must be able to be measured in monetary terms.
    4. The organization must have an insurable interest (it must be the party that incurs the loss).
    5. An insurance company must offer insurance against that risk.
    Other Forms of Risk Transfer

    Other forms of risk transfer include:

    • Self-insurance
      • Appropriate funds can be set aside in advance to address the financial impact of a risk event should it occur.
    • Warranties
    • Contractual transfer
      • The financial impact of a risk event can be transferred to a third party through clauses agreed to in a contract.
      • For example, a vendor can be contractually obligated to assume all costs resulting from failing to secure the organization’s data.
    • Example email addressing fields of an IT Risk Transfer to an insurance company.

    Accept risks that fall below established thresholds

    Risk Acceptance

    Accepting a risk means tolerating the expected cost of a risk event. It is a conscious and deliberate decision to retain the threat.

    You may choose to accept a risk event for one of the following three reasons:

    1. The risk severity (expected cost) of the risk event falls below acceptability thresholds and does not justify an investment in a risk avoidance, mitigation, or transfer measure.
    2. The risk severity (expected cost) exceeds acceptability thresholds but all effective risk avoidance, mitigation, and transfer measures are ineffective or prohibitively expensive.
    3. The risk severity (expected cost) exceeds acceptability thresholds but there are no feasible risk avoidance, mitigation, and transfer measures to be implemented.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Constant monitoring and the assignment of responsibility and accountability for accepted risk events is crucial for effective management of these risks. No IT risk should be accepted without detailed documentation outlining the reasoning behind that decision and evidence of approval by senior management.

    3.1.4 Risk response cost-benefit analysis (optional)

    The purpose of a cost-benefit analysis (CBA) is to guide financial decision making.

    This helps IT make risk-conscious investment decisions that fall within the IT budget and helps the organization make sound budgetary decisions for risk response projects that cannot be addressed by IT’s existing budget.

    Instructions:
    1. Reopen the Risk Costing Tool. For each risk that you conducted an expected cost assessment in section 2.2 for, find the Excel sheet that corresponds to the risk number (e.g. R001).
    2. Identify between one and four risk response options for the risk event and document them in the Risk Costing Tool.
      • The “Risk Response 1” field will be automatically populated with expected cost data for a scenario where no action was taken (risk acceptance). This will serve as a baseline for comparing alternative responses.
      • For the following steps, go through the risk responses one by one.
    3. Estimate the first-year cost for the risk response.
      • This cost should reflect initial capital expenditures and first-year operating expenditures.
    Screenshot of the Risk Response cost-benefit-analysis from the Risk Costing Tool with 'Capital Expenditures' and 'Operating Expenditures' highlighted.

    Record the results in the Risk Costing Tool.

    3.1.4 Risk response cost-benefit analysis (continued)

    The purpose of a cost-benefit analysis (CBA) is to guide financial decision making.

    Instructions:

    1. Estimate residual risk likelihood and financial impact for Year 1 with the risk response in place.
      • Rather than estimating the likelihood level (low, medium, high), determine a precise likelihood value of the risk event occurring once the response has been implemented.
      • Estimate the dollar value of financial impacts if the risk event were to occur with the risk response in place.
      • Screenshot of the Risk Response cost-benefit-analysis from the Risk Costing Tool with figured for 'Financial Impact' and 'Probability' highlighted. The tool will calculate the expected residual cost of the risk event: (Financial Impact x Likelihood) - Costs = Expected Residual Cost
    2. Select the highest value risk response and document it in the Risk Register Tool.
    3. Document your analysis and recommendations in the Risk Event Action Plan.

    Note: See Activity 3.1.5 to build multi-year cost projections for risk responses.

    3.1.5 Create multi-year cost projections (optional)

    Select between risk response options by projecting their costs and benefits over multiple years.

    • It can be difficult to choose between risk response options that require different payment schedules. A risk response project with costs spread out over more than one year (e.g. incremental upgrades to an IT system) may be more advantageous than a project with costs concentrated up front that may cost less in the long run (e.g. replacing the system).
    • However, the impact that risk response projects have on reducing risk severity is not necessarily static. For example, an expensive project like replacing a system may drastically reduce the risk severity of a system failure. Whereas, incremental system upgrades may only marginally reduce risk severity in the short term but reach similar levels as a full system replacement in a few years.
    Instructions:

    Calculate expected cost for multiple years using the Risk Costing Tool for:

    • Risk events that are subject to change in severity over time.
    • Risk responses that reduce the severity of the risk gradually.
    • Risk responses that cannot be implemented immediately.

    Copy and paste the graphs into the Risk Report and the Risk Event Action Plan for the risk event.

    Sample charts on the cost of risk responses from the Risk Costing Tool.

    Record the results in the Risk Costing Tool.

    Step 3.2

    Report IT Risk Priorities

    Activities
    • 3.2.1 Obtain executive approval for risk action plans
    • 3.2.2 Socialize the Risk Report
    • 3.2.3 Transfer ownership of risk responses to project managers
    • 3.2.4 Finalize the Risk Management Program Manual

    This step involves the following participants:

    • IT risk council
    • Relevant business stakeholders
    • Representation from senior management team

    Outcomes of this step

    • Obtained approval for risk action plans
    • Communicated IT’s risk recommendations to senior leadership
    • Embedded risk management into day-to-day IT operations

    Monitor, Respond, and Report on IT Risk

    Step 3.1 Step 3.2

    Effectively deliver IT risk expertise to the business

    Communicate IT risk management in two directions:

    1. Up to senior leadership (and ERM if applicable)
    2. Down to IT employees (embedding risk awareness)
    3. Visualization of communicating Up to 'Senior Leadership' and Down to 'IT Personnel'.

    Create a strong paper trail and obtain sign-off for the ITRC’s recommendations.

    Now that you have collected all of the necessary raw data, you must communicate your insights and recommendations effectively.

    A fundamental task of risk management is communicating risk information to senior management. It is your responsibility to enable them to make informed risk decisions. This can be considered upward communication.

    The two primary goals of upward communication are:

    1. Transferring accountability for high-priority IT risks to the ERM or to senior leadership.
    2. Obtaining funds for risk response projects recommended by the ITRC.

    Good risk management also has a trickle-down effect impacting all of IT. This can be considered downward communication.

    The two primary goals of downward communication are:

    1. Fostering a risk-aware IT culture.
    2. Ensuring that the IT risk management program maintains momentum and runs effectively.

    3.2.1 Obtain executive approval for risk action plans

    Best Practices and Key Benefits

    Best practice is for all acceptable risks to also be signed-off by senior leadership. However, for ITRCs that brainstorm 100+ risks, this may not be possible. If this is the case, prioritize accepted risks that were assessed to be closest to the organization’s thresholds.

    By receiving a stamp of approval for each key risk from senior management, you ensure that:

    1. The organization is aware of important IT risks that may impact business objectives.
    2. The organization supports the risk assessment conducted by the ITRC.
    3. The organization supports the plan of action and monitoring responsibilities proposed by the ITRC.
    4. If a risk event were to occur, the organization holds ultimate accountability.
    Sample of the Risk Event Action Plan template.

    Task:
    All IT risks that were flagged for exceeding the organization’s severity thresholds must obtain sign-off by the CIO or another member of the senior leadership team.

    • In the assessment phase, you evaluated risks using severity thresholds approved by the business and determined whether or not they justified a risk response.
    • Whether your recommendation was to accept the risk or to analyze possible risk responses, the business should be made aware of most IT risks.

    3.2.2 Socialize the risk report

    Create a succinct, impactful document that summarizes the outcomes of risk assessment and highlights the IT risk council’s top recommendations to the senior leadership team.

    The Risk Report contains:
    • An executive summary page highlighting the main takeaways for senior management:
      • A short summary of results from the most recent risk assessment
      • Dashboard
      • A list of top 10 risks ordered from most severe to least
    • Subsequent individual risk analyses (1 to 10)
      • Detailed risk assessment data
      • Risk responses
      • Risk response analysis
      • Multi-year cost projection (see the following slide)
      • Dashboard
      • Recommendations
    Sample of the Risk Report template.

    Risk Report

    Pursue projects that reduce the likelihood or impact of the risk event

    Encourage risk awareness to extend the benefits of risk management to every aspect of IT.

    Benefits of risk awareness:

    • More preventative and proactive approaches to IT projects are discussed and considered.
    • Changes to the IT threat landscape are more likely to be detected, communicated, and acted upon.
    • IT possesses a realistic perception of its ability to perform functions and provide services.
    • Contingency plans are put in place to hedge against risk events.
    • Fewer IT risks go unidentified.
    • CIOs and business executives make better risk decisions.

    Consequences of low risk awareness:

    • False confidence about the number of IT risks impacting the organization and their severity.
    • Risk-relevant information is not communicated to the ITRC, which may result in inaccurate risk assessments.
    • Confusion surrounding whose responsibility it is to consider how risk impacts IT decision making.
    • Uncertainty and panic when unanticipated risks impact the IT department and the organization.

    Embedding risk management in the IT department is a full-time job

    Take concrete steps to increase risk-aware decision making in IT.

    The IT risk council plays an instrumental role in fostering a culture of risk awareness throughout the IT department. In addition to periodic risk assessments, fulfilling reporting requirements, and undertaking ongoing monitoring responsibilities, members of the ITRC can take a number of actions to encourage other IT employees to adopt a risk-focused approach, particularly at the project planning stage.

    Embed risk management in project planning

    Make time for discussing project risks at every project kick-off.
    • A main benefit of including senior personnel from across IT in the ITRC is that they are able to disseminate the IT risk council’s findings to their respective practices.
    • At project kick-off meetings, schedule time to identify and assess project-specific risks.
    • Encourage the project team to identify strategies to reduce the likelihood and impact of those risks and document these in the project charter.
    • Lead by example by being clear and open about what constitutes acceptable and unacceptable risks.

    Embed risk management with employee

    Train IT staff on the ITRC’s planned responses to specific risk events.
    • If a response to a particular risk event is not to implement a project but rather to institute new policies or procedures, ensure that changes are communicated to employees and that they receive training.
    Provide risk management education opportunities.
    • Remember that a more risk-aware IT employee provides more value to the organization.
    • Invest in your employees by encouraging them to pursue education opportunities like receiving risk management accreditation or providing them with educational experiences such as workshops, seminars, and eLearning.

    Embedding risk management in the IT department is a full-time job (continued)

    Encourage risk awareness by adjusting performance metrics and job titles.

    Performance metrics:

    Depending on the size of your IT department and the amount of resources dedicated to ongoing risk management, you may consider embedding risk management responsibilities into the performance assessments of certain ITRC members or other IT personnel.

    • Personalize the risk management program metrics you have documented in your Risk Management Program Manual.
    • Evidence that KPIs are monitored and frequently reported is also a good indicator that risk owners are fulfilling their risk management responsibilities.
    • Info-Tech Insight

      If risk management responsibilities are not built into performance assessments, it is less likely that they will invest time and energy into these tasks. Adding risk management metrics to performance assessments directly links good job performance with good risk management, making it more likely that ITRC activities and initiatives gain traction throughout the IT department.

    Job descriptions:

    Changing job titles to reflect the focus of an individual’s role on managing IT risk may be a good way to distinguish personnel tasked with developing KRIs and monitoring risks on a week-to-week basis.

    • Some examples include IT Risk Officer, IT Risk Manager, and IT Risk Analyst.

    3.2.3 Transfer ownership of risk responses to project managers

    Once risk responses have obtained approval and funding, it is time to transform them into fully-fledged projects.

    Image of a hand giving a key to another hand and a circle split into quadrants of Governance with 'Governance of Risks' being put into 'Governance of Projects'.

    3.2.4 Finalize the Risk Management Program Manual

    Go back through the Risk Management Program Manual and ensure that the material will accurately reflect your approach to risk management going forward.

    Remember, the program manual is a living document that should be evolving alongside your risk management program, reflecting best practices, knowledge, and experiences accrued from your own assessments and experienced risk events.

    The best way to ensure that the program manual continues to guide and document your risk management program is to make it the focal point of every ITRC meeting and ensure that one participant is tasked with making necessary adjustments and additions.

    Sample of the Risk Management Program Manual. Risk Management Program Manual

    “Upon completing the Info-Tech workshop, the deliverables that we were left with were really outstanding. We put together a 3-year project plan from a high level, outlining projects that will touch upon our high risk areas.” (Director of Security & Risk, Water Management Company)

    Don’t allow your risk management program to flatline

    54% of small businesses haven’t implemented controls to respond to the threat of cyber attacks (Source: Insurance Bureau of Canada, 2021)

    Don’t be lulled into a false sense of security. It might be your greatest risk.

    So you’ve identified the most important IT risks and implemented projects to protect IT and the business.

    Unfortunately, your risk assessment is already outdated.

    Perform regular health checks to keep your finger on the pulse of the key risks threatening the business and your reputation.

    To continue the momentum of your newly forged IT risk management program, read Info-Tech’s research on conducting periodic risk assessments and “health checks”:

    Revive Your Risk Management Program With a Regular Health Check

    • Complete Info-Tech’s Risk Management Health Check to seize the momentum you created by building a robust IT risk management program and create a process for conducting periodic health checks and embedding ongoing risk management into every aspect of IT.
    • Our focus is on using data to make IT risk assessment less like an art and more like a science. Ongoing data-driven risk management is self-improving and grounded in historical data.

    Appendix I: Familiarize yourself with key risk terminology

    Review important risk management terms and definitions.

    Risk

    An uncertain event or set of events which, should it occur, will have an effect on the achievement of objectives. A risk consists of a combination of the likelihood of a perceived threat or opportunity occurring and the magnitude of its impact on objectives (Office of Government Commerce, 2007).

    Threat

    An event that can create a negative outcome (e.g. hostile cyber/physical attacks, human errors).

    Vulnerability

    A weakness that can be taken advantage of in a system (e.g. weakness in hardware, software, business processes).

    Risk Management

    The systematic application of principles, approaches, and processes to the tasks of identifying and assessing risks, and then planning and implementing risk responses. This provides a disciplined environment for proactive decision making (Office of Government Commerce, 2007).

    Risk Category

    Distinct from a risk event, a category is an abstract profile of risk. It represents a common group of risks. For example, you can group certain types of risks under the risk category of IT Operations Risks.

    Risk Event

    A specific occurrence of an event that falls under a particular risk category. For example, a phishing attack is a risk event that falls under the risk category of IT Security Risks.

    Risk Appetite

    An organization’s attitude towards risk taking, which determines the amount of risk that it considers acceptable. Risk appetite also refers to an organization’s willingness to take on certain levels of exposure to risk, which is influenced by the organization’s capacity to financially bear risk.

    Enterprise Risk Management

    (ERM) – A strategic business discipline that supports the achievement of an organization’s objectives by addressing the full spectrum of organizational risks and managing the combined impact of those risks as an interrelated risk portfolio (RIMS, 2015).

    Appendix II: Likelihood vs. Frequency

    Why we measure likelihood, not frequency:

    The basic formula of Likelihood x Impact = Severity is a common methodology used across risk management frameworks. However, some frameworks measure likelihood using Frequency rather than Likelihood.

    Frequency is typically measured as the number of instances an event occurs over a given period of time (e.g. once per month).

    • For risk assessment, historical data regarding the frequency of a risk event is commonly used to indicate the likelihood that the event will happen in the future.

    Likelihood is a numerical representation of the “degree of belief” that the risk event will occur in a given future timeframe (e.g. 25% likelihood that the event will occur within the next year).

    False Objectivity

    While some may argue that frequency provides an objective measurement of likelihood, it is well understood in the field of likelihood theory that historical data regarding the frequency of a risk event may have little bearing over the likelihood of that event happening in the future. Frequency is often an indication of future likelihood but should not be considered an objective measurement of it.

    Likelihood scales that use frequency underestimate the magnitude of risks that lack historical precedent. For example, an IT department that has never experienced a high-impact data breach would adopt a very low likelihood score using the frequentist approach. However, if all of the organization’s major competitors have suffered a major breach within the last two years, they ought to possess a much higher degree of belief that the risk event will occur within the next year.

    Likelihood is a more comprehensive measurement of future likelihood, as frequency can be used to inform the selection of a likelihood value. The process of selecting intersubjective likelihood values will naturally internalize historical data such as the frequency that the event occurred in the past. Further, the frequency that the event is expected to occur in the future can be captured by the expected impact value. For example, a risk event that has an expected impact per occurrence of $10,000 that is expected to occur three times over the next year has an expected impact of $30,000.

    Appendix III: Should max impacts sway decision making?

    Don’t just fixate on the most likely impact – be aware of high-impact outcomes.

    During assessment, risks are evaluated according to their most likely financial impact.

    • For example, a service outage will likely last for two hours and may have an expected cost of $14,000.

    Naturally, focusing on the most likely financial impact will exclude higher impacts that – while theoretically possible – are so unlikely that they do not warrant any real consideration.

    • For example, it is possible that a service outage could last for days; however, the likelihood for such an event may be well below 1%.

    While the risk severity level assessment allows you to present impacts as a range of values (e.g. $50,000 to $75,000), the expected cost assessment requires you to select specific values.

    • However, this analysis may fail to consider much higher potential impacts that have non-negligible likelihood values (likelihood values that you cannot ignore).
    • What you consider “non-negligible” will depend on your organizational risk tolerance/appetite.

    Sometimes called Black Swan events or Fat-Tailed outcomes, high-impact events may occur when the far right of the likelihood distribution – or the “tail” – is thicker than a normal distribution (see fig. 2).

    • A good example is a data breach. While small to medium impacts are far more likely to occur than a devastating intrusion, the high-impact scenario cannot be ignored completely.

    For risk events that contain non-negligible likelihoods (too high to be ignored) consider elevating the risk severity level or expected cost.

    Figure 1 is a graph presenting a 'Normal Likelihood Distribution', the axes being 'Likelihood' and 'Financial Impact'.
    Figure 2 is a graph presenting a 'Fat-Tailed Likelihood Distribution' with a point at the top of the parabola labelled 'Most Likely Impact' but with a much wider bottom labelled 'Fat-Tailed Outcomes', the axes being 'Likelihood' and 'Financial Impact'.

    Leverage Info-Tech’s research on security and compliance risk to identify additional risk events

    Title card of the Info-tech blueprint 'Take Control of Compliance Improvement to Conquer Every Audit' with subtitle 'Don't gamble recklessly with external compliance. Play a winning system and take calculated risks to stack the odds in your favor.


    Take Control of Compliance Improvement to Conquer Every Audit

    Info-Tech Insight

    Don’t gamble recklessly with external compliance. Play a winning system and take calculated risks to stack the odds in your favor.

    Take an agile approach to analyze your gaps and prioritize your remediations. You don’t always have to be fully compliant as long as your organization understands and can live with the consequences.

    Stock photo of a woman sitting at a computer surrounded by rows of computers.


    Develop and Implement a Security Risk Management Program

    Info-Tech Insight

    Security risk management equals cost effectiveness.

    Time spent upfront identifying and prioritizing risks can mean the difference between spending too much and staying on budget.

    Research Contributors and Experts

    Sandi Conrad
    Principal Research Director
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Christine Coz
    Executive Counsellor
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Milena Litoiu
    Principal Research Director
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Scott Magerfleisch
    Executive Advisor
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Aadil Nanji
    Research Director
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Andy Neill
    Associate Vice-President of Research
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Daisha Pennie
    IT Risk Management
    Oklahoma State University

    Ken Piddington
    CIO and Executive Advisor
    MRE Consulting

    Frank Sewell
    Research Director
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Andrew Sharpe
    Research Director
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Chris Warner
    Consulting Director- Security
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Sterling Bjorndahl
    Director of IT Operations
    eHealth Saskatchewan

    Research Contributors and Experts

    Ibrahim Abdel-Kader
    Research Analyst
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Tamara Dwarika
    Internal Auditor
    A leading North American Utility

    Anne Leroux
    Director
    ES Computer Training

    Ian Mulholland
    Research Director
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Michel Fossé
    Consulting Services Manager
    IBM Canada (LGS)

    Petar Hristov
    Research Director
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Steve Woodward
    Research Director
    CEO, Cloud Perspectives

    *Plus 10 additional interviewees who wish to remain anonymous.

    Bibliography

    “2021 State of the CIO.” IDG, 28 January 2021. Web.

    “4 Reasons Why CIOs Lose Their Jobs.” Silverton Consulting, 2012. Web.

    Beasley, Mark, Bruce Branson, and Bonnie Hancock. “The State of Risk Oversight,” AICPA, April 2021. Web.

    COBIT 2019. ISACA, 2019. Web.

    “Cognyte jeopardized its database exposing 5 billion records, including earlier data breaches.” SecureBlink, 21 June 2021. Web.

    Culp, Steve. “Accenture 2019 Global Risk Management Study, Financial Services Report.” Accenture, 2019. Web.

    Curtis, Patchin, and Mark Carey. “Risk Assessment in Practice.” COSO Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, Deloitte & Touche LLP, 2012. Web.

    “Cyber Risk Management.” Insurance Bureau of Canada (IBC), 2022. Web.

    Eccles, Robert G., Scott C. Newquist, and Roland Schatz. “Reputation and Its Risks.” Harvard Business Review, February 2007. Web.

    Eden, C. and F. Ackermann. Making Strategy: The Journey of Strategic Management. Sage Publications, 1998.

    “Enterprise Risk Management Maturity Model.” OECD, 9 February 2021. Web.

    Ganguly, Saptarshi, Holger Harreis, Ben Margolis, and Kayvaun Rowshankish. “Digital Risks: Transforming risk management for the 2020s.” McKinsey & Company, 10 February 2017. Web.

    “Governance Institute of Australia Risk Management Survey 2020.” Governance Institute of Australia, 2020. Web.

    “Guidance on Enterprise Risk Management.” COSO, 2022. Web.

    Henriquez, Maria. “The Top 10 Data Breaches of 2021” Security Magazine, 9 December 2021. Web.

    Holmes, Aaron. “533 million Facebook users’ phone numbers and personal data have been leaked online.” Business Insider, 3 April 2021. Web.

    Bibliography

    “Integrated Risk and Compliance Management for Banks and Financial Services Organizations: Benefits of a Holistic Approach.” MetricStream, 2022. Web.

    “ISACA’s Risk IT Framework Offers a Structured Methodology for Enterprises to Manage Information and Technology Risk.” ISACA, 25 June 2020. Web.

    ISO 31000 Risk Management. ISO, 2018. Web.

    Lawton, George. “10 Enterprise Risk Management Trends in 2022.” TechTarget, 2 February 2022. Web.

    Levenson, Michael. “MGM Resorts Says Data Breach Exposed Some Guests’ Personal Information.” The New York Times, 19 February 2020. Web.

    Management of Risk (M_o_R): Guidance for Practitioners. Office of Government Commerce, 2007. Web.

    “Many small businesses vulnerable to cyber attacks.” Insurance Bureau of Canada (IBC), 5 October 2021.

    Maxwell, Phil. “Why risk-informed decision-making matters.” EY, 3 December 2019. Web.

    “Measuring and Mitigating Reputational Risk.” Marsh, September 2014. Web.

    Natarajan, Aarthi. “The Top 6 Business Risks you should Prepare for in 2022.” Diligent, 22 December 2021. Web.

    “Operational Risk Management Excellence – Get to Strong Survey: Executive Report.” KMPG and RMA, 2014. Web.

    “Third-party risk is becoming a first priority challenge.” Deloitte, 2022. Web.

    Thomas, Adam, and Dan Kinsella. “Extended Enterprise Risk Management Survey, 2020.” Deloitte, 2021. Web.

    Treasury Board Secretariat. “Guide to Integrated Risk Management.” Government of Canada, 12 May 2016. Web.

    Webb, Rebecca. “6 Reasons Data is Key for Risk Management.” ClearRisk, 13 January 2021. Web.

    “What is Enterprise Risk Management (ERM)?” RIMS, 2015. Web.

    Wiggins, Perry. “Do you spend enough time assessing strategic risks?” CFO, 26 January 2022. Web.

    Establish an Effective Data Protection Plan

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}504|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $6,850 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 9 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Storage & Backup Optimization
    • Parent Category Link: /storage-and-backup-optimization
    • Business requirements can be vague. Not knowing the business needs often results in overspending and overexposure to liability through data hoarding.
    • Backup options are abundant. Disk, tape, or cloud? Each has drawbacks, efficiencies, and cost factors that should be considered.
    • Backup infrastructure is never greenfield. Any organization with a history has been doing backup. Existing software was likely determined by past choices and architecture.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Don’t let failure be your metric.
      The past is not an indication of future performance! Quantify the cost of your data being unavailable to demonstrate value to the business.
    • Stop offloading backup to your most junior staff.
      Data protection should not exist in isolation. Get key leadership involved to ensure you can meet organizational requirements.
    • A lot of data is useless. Neglecting to properly tag and classify data will lead to a costly data protection solution that protects redundant, useless, or outdated data

    Impact and Result

    • Determine the current state of your data protection strategy by identifying the pains and gains of the solution and create a business-facing diagram to present to relevant stakeholders.
    • Quantify the value of data to the business to properly understand the requirements for data protection through a business impact analysis.
    • Identify the attributes and necessary requirements for your data tiers to procure a fit-for-purpose solution.

    Establish an Effective Data Protection Plan Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read this Executive Brief to understand why the business should be involved in your data protection plan, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Define the current state of your data protection plan

    Define the current state of your data protection practices by documenting the backup process and identifying problems and opportunities for the desired state.

    • Establish an Effective Data Protection Plan – Phase 1: Define the Current State of Your Data Protection Plan
    • Data Protection Value Proposition Canvas Template

    2. Conduct a business impact analysis to understand requirements for restoring data

    Understand the business priorities.

    • Establish an Effective Data Protection Plan – Phase 2: Conduct a Business Impact Analysis to Understand Requirements for Restoring Data
    • DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool
    • Legacy DRP Business Impact Analysis Tool
    • Data Protection Recovery Workflow

    3. Propose the future state of your data protection plan

    Determine the desired state.

    • Establish an Effective Data Protection Plan – Phase 3: Propose the Future State of Your Data Protection Plan

    4. Establish proper governance for your data protection plan

    Explore the component of governance required.

    • Establish an Effective Data Protection Plan – Phase 4: Establish Proper Governance for Your Data Protection Plan
    • Data Protection Proposal Template
    [infographic]

    The State of Black Professionals in Tech

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}550|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Engage
    • Parent Category Link: /engage
    • The experience of Black professionals in IT differs from their colleagues.
    • Job satisfaction is also lower for Black IT professionals.
    • For organizations to gain from the benefits of diversity, equity, and inclusion, they need to ensure they understand the landscape for many Black professionals.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • As an IT leader, you can make a positive difference in the working lives of your team; this is not just the domain of HR.
    • Employee goals can vary depending on the barriers that they encounter. IT leaders must ensure they have an understanding of unique employee needs to better support them, increasing their ability to recruit and retain.
    • Improve the experience of Black IT professionals by ensuring your organization has diversity in leadership and supports mentorship and sponsorship.

    Impact and Result

    • Use the data from Info-Tech’s analysis to inform your DEI strategy.
    • Learn about actions that IT leaders can take to improve the satisfaction and career advancement of their Black employees.

    The State of Black Professionals in Tech Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. The State of Black Professionals in Tech Report – A report providing you with advice on barriers and solutions for leaders of Black employees.

    IT leaders often realize that there are barriers impacting their employees but don’t know how to address them. This report provides insights on the barriers and actions that can help improve the lives of Black professionals in technology.

    • The State of Black Professionals in Tech Report

    Infographic

    Further reading

    The State of Black Professionals in Tech

    Keep inclusion at the forefront to gain the benefits from diversity.

    Analysts' Perspective

    The experience of Black professionals in technology is unique.

    Diversity in tech is not a new topic, and it's not a secret that technology organizations struggle to attract and retain Black employees. Ever since the early '90s, large tech organizations have been dealing with public critique of their lack of diversity. This topic is close to our hearts, but unfortunately while improvements have been made, progress is quite slow.

    In recent years, current events have once again brought diversity to the forefront for many organizations. In addition, the pandemic along with talent trends such as "the great resignation" and "quiet quitting" and preparations for a recession have not only impacted diversity at large but also Black professionals in technology. Our previous research has focused on the wider topic of Recruiting and Retaining People of Color in Tech, but we've found that the experiences of persons of color are not all the same.

    This study focuses on the unique experience of Black professionals in technology. Over 600 people were surveyed using an online tool; interviews provided additional insights. We're excited to share our findings with you.

    This is a picture of Allison Straker This is an image of Ugbad Farah

    Allison Straker
    Research Director
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Ugbad Farah
    Research Director
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Demographics

    In October 2021, we launched a survey to understand what the Black experience is like for people in technology. We wanted and received a variety of responses which would help us to understand how Black technology professionals experienced their working world. We received responses from 633 professionals, providing us with the data for this report.

    For more information on our survey demographics please see the appendix at this end of this report.

    A pie chart showing 26% black and 74% All Other

    26% of our respondents either identified as Black or felt the world sees them as Black.

    Professionals from various countries responded to the survey:

    • Most respondents were born in the US (52%), Canada (14%), India (14%), or Nigeria (4%).
    • Most respondents live in the US (56%), Canada (25%), Nigeria (2%), or the United Kingdom (2%).

    Companies with more diversity achieve more revenue from innovation

    Organizations do better and are more innovative when they have more diversity, a key ingredient in an organization's secret sauce.
    Organizations also benefit from engaged employees, yet we've seen that organizations struggle with both. Just having a certain number of diverse individuals is not enough. When it comes to reaping the benefits of diversity, organizations can flourish when employees feel safe bringing their whole selves to work.

    45% Innovation Revenue by Companies With Above-Average Diversity Scores
    26%

    Innovation Revenue by Companies With Below-Average Diversity Scores

    (Chart source: McKinsey, 2020)


    Companies with higher employee engagement experience 19.2% higher earnings.

    However, those with lower employee engagement experience 32.7% lower earnings.
    (DecisionWise, 2020)

    If your workforce doesn't reflect the community it serves, your business may be missing out on the chance to find great employees and break into new and growing markets, both locally and globally.
    Diversity makes good business sense.
    (Business Development Canada, 2023)

    A study about Black professionals

    Why is this about Black professionals and not other diverse groups?

    While there are a variety of diversity dimensions, it's important to understand what makes up a "multicultural workforce." There is more to diversity than gender, race, and ethnicity. Organizations need to understand that there is diversity within these groups and Black professionals have their own unique experience when it comes to entering and navigating tech that needs to be addressed.

    This image contains two bar graphs from the Brookfield Institute for Innovation and Entrepreneurship. They show the answers to two questions, sorted by the following categories: Black; Non-White; Asian; White. The questions are as follows: I feel comfortable to voice my opinion, even when it differs from the group opinion; I am part of the decision-making process at work.

    (Brookfield Institute for Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 2019)

    The solutions that apply to Black professionals are not only beneficial for Black employees but for all. While all demographics are unique, the solutions in this report can support many.

    Unsatisfied and underrepresented

    Less Black professionals responded as "satisfied" in their IT careers. The question is: How do we mend the Gap?

    Percentage of IT Professionals Who Reported Being Very Satisfied in Their Current Role

    • All Other Professionals: 34%
    • Black Professionals: 23%

    Black workers are underrepresented in most professional roles, especially computer and math Occupations

    A bar graph showing representation of black workers in the total workforce compared to computer and mathematical science occupations.

    The gap in satisfaction

    What's Important?

    Our research suggests that the differences in satisfaction among ethnic groups are related to differences in value systems. We asked respondents to rank what's important, and we explored why.

    Non-Black professionals rated autonomy and their manager working relationships as most important.

    For Black professionals, while those were important, #1 was promotion and growth opportunities, ranked #7 by all other professionals. This is a significant discrepancy.

    Recognition of my work/accomplishments also was viewed significantly differently, with Black professionals ranking it low on the list at #7 and all other professionals considering it very important at #3.

    All Other Professionals

    Black Professionals

    Two columns, containing metrics of satisfaction rated by Black Professionals, and All Other Professionals.

    Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs applies to job satisfaction

    In Maslow's hierarchy, it is necessary for people to achieve items lower on the hierarchy before they can successfully pursue the higher tiers.

    An image of Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs modified to apply to Job Satisfaction

    Too many Black professionals in tech are busy trying to achieve some of the lower parts of the hierarchy; it is stopping them from achieving elements higher up that can lead to job satisfaction.

    This can stop them from gaining esteem, importance, and ultimately, self-actualization. The barriers that impact safety and social belonging happen on a day-to-day basis, and so the day-to-day lives of Black professionals in tech can look very different from their counterparts.

    There are barriers that hinder and solutions that support employees

    An image showing barriers to success An image showing Actions for Success.
    There are various barriers that increase the likelihood for Black professionals to focus on the lower end of the needs hierarchy:

    These are among some of the solutions that, when layered, can support Black professionals in tech in moving up the needs hierarchy.

    Focusing on these actions can support Black professionals in achieving much needed job satisfaction.

    What does this mean?

    The minority experience is not a monolith

    The barriers that Black professionals encounter aren't limited to the same barriers as their colleagues, and too often this means that they aren't in a position to grow their careers in a way that leads to job satisfaction.

    There is a 11% gap between the satisfaction of Black professionals and their peers.

    Early Steps:
    Take time to understand the Black experience.

    As leaders, it's important to be aware that employee goals vary depending on the barriers they're battling with.

    Intermediate:
    If Black employees don't have strong relationships, networks, and mentorships it becomes increasingly difficult to navigate the path to upward mobility.

    As a leader, you can look for opportunities to bridge the gap on these types of conversations.

    Advanced:
    Black professionals in tech are not advancing like their counterparts.

    Creating clear career paths will not only benefit Black employees but also support your entire organization.

    Key metrics:

    • Engagement
    • Committed Executive Leadership
    • Development Opportunities
    • Organizational Programs

    Black respondents are significantly more likely to report barriers to their career advancement

    Common barriers

    Black professionals, like their colleagues, encounter barriers as they try to advance their careers. The barriers both groups encounter include microaggressions, racism, ageism, accessibility issues, sexual orientation, bias due to religion, lack of a career-supported network, gender bias, family status bias, and discrimination due to language/accents.

    What tops the list

    Microaggressions and racism are at the top of these barriers, but Black professionals also deal with other barriers that their colleagues may experience, such as gender-based bias, accessibility issues, religion, and more.

    One of these barriers alone can be difficult to deal with but when they are compounded it can be very difficult to navigate through the working environment in tech.

    A graph charting the impact of the common barriers

    What are microaggressions?

    Microaggression

    A statement, action, or incident regarded as an instance of indirect, subtle, or unintentional discrimination against members of a marginalized group such as a racial or ethnic minority.

    (Oxford Languages, 2023)

    Why are they significant?

    These things may seem innocent enough but the messaging that is received and the lasting impression is often far from it.

    Our research shows that racism and discrimination contribute to poor mental health among Black professionals.

    Examples

    • You're so articulate!
    • How do you always have different hair, can I touch it?
    • Where are you really from?
    • I don't see color.
    • I believe the most qualified person should get the job; everyone can succeed in this society if they work hard enough.

    "The experience of having to question whether something happened to you because of your race or constantly being on edge because your environment is hostile can often leave people feeling invisible, silenced, angry, and resentful."
    Dr. Joy Bradford,
    clinical Psychologist, qtd. In Pfizer

    It takes some time to get in the door

    For too many Black respondents, It took Longer than their peers to Find Technology Jobs.

    Both groups had some success finding jobs in "no time" – however, there was a difference. Thirty-four percent of "all others" found their jobs quickly, while the numbers were less for Black professionals, at 26%. There was also a difference at the opposite end of the spectrum. For 29% of Black professionals, it took seven months or longer to find their IT job, while that number is only 19% for their peers.

    .a graph showing time taken for respondents sorted by black; and all other.

    This points to the need for improvements in recruitment and career advancement.

    29% of Black respondents said that it took them 7 months or longer to find their technology job.

    Compared to 19% of all other professionals that selected the same response.

    And once they're in, it's difficult to advance

    Black Professionals are not Advancing as Quickly as their Colleagues. Especially when you look at their Experience.

    Our research shows that compared to all other ethnicities; Black participants were 55% more likely to report that they had no career advancement/promotion in their career. There is a bigger percentage of Black professionals who have never received a promotion; there's also a large number of Black professionals who have been working a significant amount time in the same role without a promotion.

    .Career Advancement

    A graph showing career advancement for the categories: Black and All Other.

    Black participants were 55% more likely to report that they had had no career advancement/promotion in their career.

    No advancement

    A graph showing the number of respondents who reported no career advancement over time, for the categories: Black; and All Other.

    There's a high cost to lack of engagement

    When employees feel disillusioned with things like career advancement and microaggressions, they often become disengaged. When you continuously have to steel yourself against microaggressions, racism, and other barriers, it prevents you from bringing your whole self to the office. The barriers can lead to what's been coined as "emotional tax." An emotional tax is the experience of feeling different from colleagues because of your inherent diversity and the associated negative effects on health, wellbeing, and the ability to thrive at work.

    Earnings of companies with higher employee engagement

    19.2%

    Earnings of companies with lower employee engagement

    -32.7%

    (DecisionWise, 2020)

    "I've conditioned myself for the corporate world, I don't bring my authentic self to work."
    Anonymous Interview Subject

    Lack of engagement also costs the organization in terms of turnover, something many organizations today are struggling with how to address. Organizations want to increase the ability of the workforce to remain in the organization. For Black employees, this gets harder when they're not engaged and they're the only one. When the emotional tax gets to be too much, this can lead to turnover. Turnover not only costs companies billions in profits, it also negatively impacts leadership diversity. It's difficult to imagine career growth when you don't see anyone that looks like you at the top. It is a challenge to see your future when there aren't others that you can relate to at top levels in the organization, leading to one of our interview subjects to muse, "How long can I last?"

    "Being Black in tech can be hard on your mental health. Your mind is constantly wondering, 'how long can I last?' "
    Anonymous Interview Subject

    Fewer Black professionals feel like they can be their authentic selves at work

    Authentic vs. Successes

    For many Black professionals, "code-switching," or altering the way one speaks and acts depending on context, becomes the norm to make others more comfortable. Many feel that being authentic and succeeding in the workplace are mutually exclusive.

    Programs and Resources

    We asked respondents "What's in place to build an inclusive culture at your company?" Most respondents (51% and 45%) reported that there were employee resource groups at their organizations.

    Do you feel you can be your authentic self at work?

    A bar graph showing 86% for All Other Professions, and 75% for Black Professionals

    A bar graph showing responses to the question What’s in place to build an inclusive culture at your company.

    What can be done?

    An image showing actions for success.

    There are various actions that organizations can take to help address barriers.

    It's important to ensure these are not put in as band-aid solutions but that they are carefully thought out and layered.

    Our findings demonstrate that remote work, career development, and DEI programs along with mentorship and diverse leadership are strong enablers of professional satisfaction. An unfortunate consequence, if professionals are not nurtured, is that we risk losing much needed talent to self-employment or to other organizations.

    There are several solutions

    Respondents were asked to distribute points across potential solutions that could lead to job satisfaction. The ratings showed that there were common solutions that could be leveraged across all groups.

    Respondents were asked what solutions were valuable for their career development.

    All groups were mostly aligned on the order of the solutions that would lead to career satisfaction; however, Black professionals rated the importance of employee resource groups as higher than their colleagues did.

    An image showing how respondents rate a number of categories, sorted into Ratings by Black Professionals, and Ratings by Other Professionals

    Mentorship and sponsorship are seen as key for all employees, as is of course training.

    However, employee resource groups (ERGs) were rated significantly higher for Black professionals and discussions around diversity were higher for their colleagues. This may be because other groups feel a need to learn more about diversity, whereas Black professionals live this experience on a day-to day basis, so it's not as critical for them.

    Double the number of satisfied Black professionals through mentorship and sponsorship

    a bar graph showing the number of very satisfied people with and without mentors/sponsors.

    Mentorship and sponsorship help to close the job satisfaction gap for Black IT professionals. The percentage of satisfied Black employees almost doubles when they have a mentor or sponsorship, moving the satisfaction rate to closer to all other colleagues.

    As leaders, you likely benefit from a few different advisors, and your staff should be able to benefit in the same way.

    They can have their own personal board of advisors, both inside and outside of your organization, helping them to navigate the working world in IT.

    To support your staff, provide guidance and coaching to internal mentors so that they can best support employees, and ensure that your organizational culture supports relationship building and trust.

    While all are critical, coaching, mentoring, and sponsorship are not the same

    Coaching

    Performance-driven guidance geared to support the employee with on-the-job performance. This could be a short-term relationship.

    Mentorship

    A relationship where the mentor provides guidance, information, and expertise to support the long-term career development of the mentee.

    Sponsorship

    The act of advocating on the behalf of another for a position, promotion, development opportunity, etc. over a longer period.

    For more information on setting up a mentorship program, see Optimize the Mentoring Program to Build a High Performing Learning Organization.

    On why mentorship and sponsorship are important:

    "With some degree of mentorship or sponsorship, it means that your ability to thrive or to have a positive experience in organizations increases substantially.

    Mentorship and sponsorship are very often the lynchpin of someone being successful and sticking with an organization.

    Sponsorship is an endorsement to other high-level stakeholders who very often are the gatekeepers of opportunity. Sponsors help to shepherd you through the gate."

    An Image of Carlos Thomas

    Carlos Thomas
    Executive Councilor, Info-Tech Research Group

    What is an employee resource group?

    IT Professionals rated ERGs as the third top driver of success at work

    Employee resource groups enable employees to connect in their workplace based on shared characteristics or life experiences.

    ERGs generally focus on providing support, enhancing career development, and contributing to personal development in the work environment. Some ERGs provide advice to the organization on how they can support their diverse employees.

    As leaders, you should support and encourage the formation of ERGs in your organization.

    What each ERG does will vary according to the needs of employees in your organization. Your role is to enable the ERGs as they are created and maintained.

    On setting up and leveraging employee resource groups:

    "Employee resource groups, when leveraged in an authentically intentional way, can be the some of the most impactful stakeholders in the development and implementation of the organizational diversity, equity, and inclusion strategy.

    ERGs are essential to the development of policies, programs, and initiatives that address the needs of equity-seeking groups and are key to driving organizational culture and employee wellbeing, in addition to hiring and recruitment.

    ERGs must be set up for success by having adequate resources to do the work, which includes adequate budgets, executive sponsorship, training, support, and capacity to do the work. According to a Great Place To Work survey (2021), 50% of ERGs identified the need for adequate resources as a challenge for carrying out the work.:"

    An image of Cinnamon Clark

    CINNAMON CLARK
    PRACTICE LEAD, DIVERSITY, EQUITY AND INCLUSION services, MCLEAN & CO

    There is a gap when it comes to diversity in leadership

    Representation at leadership levels is especially stagnant.

    Black Americans comprise 13.6% of the US population
    (2022 data from the US Census Bureau)

    And yet only 5.9% of the country's CEOs are Black, with only 6 (1%) at the top of Fortune 500 companies.
    (2021 data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Fortune.com)

    I've never worked for a company that has Black executives. It's difficult to envision long-term growth with an organization when you don't see yourself represented in leadership.
    – Anonymous Interview Subject

    Having diversity in your leadership team doubles satisfaction

    An image of a bar graph showing satisfaction for those who do, and do not see diversity in their company's leadership.

    Our research shows that Black professionals are more satisfied in their role when they see leaders that look like them.

    Satisfaction of other professionals is not as impacted by diversity in leadership as for Black professionals. Satisfaction doubles in organizations that have a diverse leadership team.

    To reap the benefits from diversity, we need to ensure diversity is not just in entry or mid-level positions and provide employees an opportunity to see diversity in their company's leadership.

    On the need for diversity in leadership:

    "As a Black professional leader, it's not lost on me that I have a responsibility. I have to demonstrate authenticity, professionalism, and exemplary behavior that others can mimic. And I must also showcase that there are possibilities for those coming up in their career. I feel very grateful that I can bestow onto others my knowledge, my experience, my journey, and the tips that I've used to help bring me to be where I am.
    (Having Black leaders in an organization) demonstrates that there is talent across the board, that there are all types of women and people with proficiencies. What it brings to the table is a difference in thoughts and experience.
    A person like myself, sitting at the table, can bring a unique perspective on employee behavior and employee impact. CCL is an organization focused on equity, diversity, and inclusion; for sure having me at the table and others that look like me at the table demonstrates to the public an organization that's practicing what it preaches."

    An image of C. Fara Francis

    C. Fara Francis
    CIO, Center for creative leadership

    Work from home

    While all groups have embraced the work-from-home movement, many Black professionals find it reduces the impact of racial incidents in the workplace.

    Percentage of employees who experienced positive changes in motivation after working remotely.

    Black: 43%; All Other: 43%

    I have to guard and protect myself from experiencing and witnessing racism every day. I am currently working remotely, and I can say for certain my mood and demeanor have improved. Not having to decide if I should address a racist comment or action has made my day easier.
    Source: Slate, 2022

    Remote work significantly led to feelings of better chances for career advancement

    Survey respondents were asked about the positive and negative changes they saw in their interactions and experiences with remote work. Black employees and their colleagues replied similarly, with mostly positive experiences.

    While both groups enjoyed better chances for career advancement, the difference was significantly higher for Black professionals.

    An image of a series of bar graphs showing the effects of remote work on a number of factors.

    Reasons for Self-Employment:

    More Black professionals have chosen self-employment than their colleagues.

    All Other: 26%; Black: 30%.

    A bar graph showing rankings for reasons for self employment, sorted by Black and All Other.

    The biggest reasons for both groups in choosing self-employment were for better pay, career growth, and work/life balance.

    While the desire for better pay was the highest reason for both groups, for engaged employees salary is a lower priority than other concerns (Adecco Group's Global Workforce of the Future report). Consider salary in conjunction with career growth, work/life balance, and the variety in the work that your employees have.

    A bar graph showing rankings for reasons for self employment, sorted by Black and All Other.

    If we don't consider our Black employees, not only do we risk them leaving the organization, but they may decide to just work for themselves.

    Most professionals believe their organizations are committed to diversity, equity, and inclusion

    38% of all respondents believe their organizations are very committed to DEI
    49% believe they are somewhat committed
    9% feel they are not committed
    4% are unsure

    Make sure supports are in place to help your employees grow in their careers:

    Leadership
    IT Leadership Career Planning Research Center

    Diversity and Inclusion Tactics
    IT Diversity & Inclusion Tactics

    Employee Development Planning
    Implement an IT Employee Development Plan

    Belief in your organization's diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts isn't consistent across groups: Make sure actions are seen as genuine

    While organization's efforts are acknowledged, Black professionals aren't as optimistic about the commitment as their peers. Make sure that your programs are reaching the various groups you want to impact, to increase the likelihood of satisfaction in their roles.

    SATISFACTION INCREASES IN BOTH BLACK AND NON-BLACK PROFESSIONALS

    When they believe in their company's commitment to diversity, equity. and inclusion.

    Of those who believe in their organization's commitment, 61% of Black professionals and 67% of non-Black professionals are very satisfied in their roles.

    BELIEVE THEIR ORGANIZATION IS NOT COMMITTED TO DEI

    BELIEVE THEIR ORGANIZATION IS VERY COMMITTED TO DEI

    NON-BLACK PROFESSIONALS

    8%

    41%

    BLACK PROFESSIONALS

    13%

    30%

    Recommendations

    It's important to understand the current landscape:

    • The barriers that Black employees often face.
    • The potential solutions that can help close the gap in employee satisfaction.

    We recognize that resolving this is not easy. Although senior executives are recognizing that a diverse set of experiences, perspectives, and backgrounds is crucial to fostering innovation and competing on the global stage, organizations often don't take the extra step to actively look for racialized talent, and many people still believe that race doesn't play an important part in an individual's ability to access opportunities.

    Look at a variety of solutions that you can implement within your organization; layering solutions is the key to driving business diversity. Always keep in mind that diversity is not a monolith, that the experiences of each demographic varies.

    Info-Tech resources

    Appendix

    About the research

    Diversity in tech survey

    As part of the research process for the State of Black Tech Report, Info-Tech Research Group conducted an open online survey among its membership and wider community of professionals. The survey was fielded from October 2021 to April 2022, collecting 633 responses.

    An image of Page 1 of the Appendix.

    Current Position

    An image of Page 2 of the Appendix.

    Education and Experience

    Education was fairly consistent across both groups, with a few exceptions: more Black professionals had secondary school (9% vs. 4%) and more Black professionals had Doctorate degrees (4% vs. 2%).

    We had more non-Black respondents with 20+ years of experience (31% vs. 19%) and more Black respondents with less than 1 year of experience (8% vs. 5%) – the rest of the years of experience were consistent across the two groups.

    An image of Page 3 of the Appendix.

    It is important to recognize that people are often seen by "the world" as belonging to a different race or set of races than what they personally identify as. Both aspects impact a professional's experience in the workplace.

    An image of Page 4 of the Appendix.

    Bibliography

    Barton, LeRon. “I’m Black. Remote Work Has Been Great for My Mental Health.” Slate, 15 July 2022.

    “Black or African American alone, percent.” U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts: United States. Accessed 14 February 2023.

    Boyle, Matthew. “More Workers Ready to Quit Over ‘Window Dressing’ Racism Efforts.” Bloomberg.com, 9 June 2022.

    Boyle, Matthew. “Remote Work Has Vastly Improved the Black Worker Experience.” Bloomberg.com, 5 October 2021.

    Cooper, Frank, and Ranjay Gulati. “What Do Black Executives Really Want?” Harvard Business Review, 18 November 2021.

    “Emotional Tax.” Catalyst. Accessed 1 April 2022.

    “Employed Persons by Detailed Occupation, Sex, Race, and Hispanic or Latino Ethnicity” U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Accessed February 14, 2023.

    “Equality in Tech Report - Welcome.” Dice, 9 March 2022. Accessed 23 March 2022.

    Erb, Marcus. "Leaders Are Missing the Promise and Problems of Employee Resource Groups." Great Place To Work, 30 June 2021.

    Gawlak, Emily, et al. “Key Findings - Being Black In Corporate America.” Coqual, Center for Talent Innovation (CTI), 2019.

    “Global Workforce of the Future Research.” Adecco, 2022. Accessed 4 February 2023.

    Gruman, Galen. “The State of Ethnic Minorities in U.S. Tech: 2020.” Computerworld, 21 September 2020. Accessed 31 May 2022.

    Hancock, Bryan, et al. “Black Workers in the US Private Sector.” McKinsey, 21 February 2021. Accessed 1 April 2022.

    “Hierarchy Of Needs Applied To Employee Engagement.” Proactive Insights, 12 February 2020.

    Hobbs, Cecyl. “Shaping the Future of Leadership for Black Tech Talent.” Russell Reynolds Associates, 27 January 2022. Accessed 3 August 2022.

    Hubbard, Lucas. “Race, Not Job, Predicts Economic Outcomes for Black Households.” Duke Today, 16 September 2021. Accessed 30 May 2022.

    Knight, Marcus. “How the Tech Industry Can Be More Inclusive to the Black Community.” Crunchbase, 23 February 2022.

    “Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs in Employee Engagement (Pre and Post Covid 19).” Vantage Circle HR Blog, 30 May 2022.

    McDonald, Autumn. “The Racism of the ‘Hard-to-Find’ Qualified Black Candidate Trope (SSIR).” Stanford Social Innovation Review, 1 June 2021. Accessed 13 December 2021.

    McGlauflin, Paige. “The Fortune 500 Features 6 Black CEOs—and the First Black Founder Ever.” Fortune, 23 May 2022. Accessed 14 February 2023.

    “Microaggression." Oxford English Dictionary, Oxford Languages, 2023.

    Reed, Jordan. "Understanding Racial Microaggression and Its Effect on Mental Health." Pfizer, 26 August 2020.

    Shemla, Meir “Why Workplace Diversity Is So Important, And Why It’s So Hard To Achieve.” Forbes, 22 August 2018. Accessed 4 February 2023.

    “The State of Black Women in Corporate America.” Lean In and McKinsey & Company, 2020. Accessed 14 January 2022.

    Van Bommel, Tara. “The Power of Empathy in Times of Crisis and Beyond (Report).” Catalyst, 2021. Accessed 1 April 2022.

    Vu, Viet, Creig Lamb, and Asher Zafar. “Who Are Canada’s Tech Workers?” Brookfield Institute for Innovation and Entrepreneurship, January 2019. Accessed on Canadian Electronic Library, 2021. Web.

    Warner, Justin. “The ROI of Employee Engagement: Show Me the Money!” DecisionWise, 1 January 2020. Web.

    White, Sarah K. “5 Revealing Statistics about Career Challenges Black IT Pros Face.” CIO (blog), 9 February 2023. Accessed 5 July 2022.

    Williams, Joan C. “Stop Asking Women of Color to Do Unpaid Diversity Work.” Bloomberg.com, 14 April 2022.

    Williams, Joan C., Rachel Korn, and Asma Ghani. “A New Report Outlines Some of the Barriers Facing Asian Women in Tech.” Fast Company, 13 April 2022.

    Wilson, Valerie, Ethan Miller, and Melat Kassa. “Racial representation in professional occupations.” Economic Policy Institute, 8 June 2021.

    “Workplace Diversity: Why It’s Good for Business.” Business Development Canada (BDC.ca), 6 Feb. 2023. Accessed 4 February 2023.

    Secure Operations in High-Risk Jurisdictions

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}369|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Security Strategy & Budgeting
    • Parent Category Link: /security-strategy-and-budgeting

    Business operations in high-risk areas of the world contend with complex threat environments and risk scenarios that often require a unique response. But traditional approaches to security strategy often miss these jurisdictional risks, leaving organizations vulnerable to threats that range from cybercrime and data breaches to fines and penalties.

    Security leaders need to identify high-risk jurisdictions, inventory critical assets, identify vulnerabilities, assess risks, and identify security controls necessary to mitigate those risks.

    Secure operations and protect critical assets in high-risk regions

    Across risks that include insider threats and commercial surveillance, the two greatest vulnerabilities that organizations face in high-risk parts of the world are travel and compliance. Organizations can make small adjustments to their security program to address these risks:

    1. Support high-risk travel: Put measures and guidelines in place to protect personnel, data, and devices before, during, and after employee travel.
    2. Mitigate compliance risk: Consider data residency requirements, data breach notification, cross-border data transfer, and third-party risks to support business growth.

    Using these two prevalent risk scenarios in high-risk jurisdictions as examples, this research walks you through the steps to analyze the threat landscape, assess security risks, and execute a response to mitigate them.

    Secure Operations in High-Risk Jurisdictions Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Secure Operations in High-Risk Jurisdictions – A step-by-step approach to mitigating jurisdictional security and privacy risks.

    Traditional approaches to security strategy often miss jurisdictional risks. Use this storyboard to make small adjustments to your security program to mitigate security risks in high-risk jurisdictions.

    • Secure Operations in High-Risk Jurisdictions – Phases 1-3

    2. Jurisdictional Risk Register and Heat Map Tool – A tool to inventory, assess, and treat jurisdictional risks.

    Use this tool to track jurisdictional risks, assess the exposure of critical assets, and identify mitigation controls. Use the geographic heatmap to communicate inherent jurisdictional risk with key stakeholders.

    • Jurisdictional Risk Register and Heat Map Tool

    3. Guidelines for Key Jurisdictional Risk Scenarios – Two structured templates to help you develop guidelines for two key jurisdictional risk scenarios: high-risk travel and compliance risk

    Use these two templates to develop help you develop your own guidelines for key jurisdictional risk scenarios. The guidelines address high-risk travel and compliance risk.

    • Digital Safety Guidelines for International Travel
    • Guidelines for Compliance With Local Security and Privacy Laws Template

    Infographic

    Workshop: Secure Operations in High-Risk Jurisdictions

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Identify Context for Risk Assessment

    The Purpose

    Assess business requirements and evaluate security pressures to set the context for the security risk assessment.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Understand the goals of the organization in high-risk jurisdictions.

    Assess the threats to critical assets in these jurisdictions and capture stakeholder expectations for information security.

    Activities

    1.1 Determine assessment scope.

    1.2 Determine business goals.

    1.3 Determine compliance obligations.

    1.4 Determine risk appetite.

    1.5 Conduct pressure analysis.

    Outputs

    Business requirements

    Security pressure analysis

    2 Analyze Key Risk Scenarios for High-Risk Jurisdictions

    The Purpose

    Build key risk scenarios for high-risk jurisdictions.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Identify critical assets in high-risk jurisdictions, their vulnerabilities to relevant threats, and the adverse impact should malicious agents exploit them.

    Assess risk exposure of critical assets in high-risk jurisdictions.

    Activities

    2.1 Identify critical assets.

    2.2 Identify threats.

    2.3 Assess risk likelihood.

    2.4 Assess risk impact.

    Outputs

    Key risk scenarios

    Jurisdictional risk exposure

    Jurisdictional Risk Register and Heat Map

    3 Build Risk Treatment Roadmap

    The Purpose

    Prioritize and treat jurisdictional risks to critical assets.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Build an initiative roadmap to reduce residual risks in high-risk jurisdictions.

    Activities

    3.1 Identify and assess risk response.

    3.2 Assess residual risks.

    3.3 Identify security controls.

    3.4 Build initiative roadmap.

    Outputs

    Action plan to mitigate key risk scenarios

    Further reading

    Secure Operations in High-Risk Jurisdictions

    Assessments often omit jurisdictional risks. Are your assets exposed?

    EXECUTIVE BRIEF

    Analyst Perspective

    Operations in high-risk jurisdictions face unique security scenarios.

    The image contains a picture of Michel Hebert.

    Michel Hébert

    Research Director

    Security and Privacy

    Info-Tech Research Group


    The image contains a picture of Alan Tang.

    Alan Tang

    Principal Research Director

    Security and Privacy

    Info-Tech Research Group


    Traditional approaches to security strategies may miss key risk scenarios that critical assets face in high-risk jurisdictions. These include high-risk travel, heightened insider threats, advanced persistent threats, and complex compliance environments. Most organizations have security strategies and risk management practices in place, but securing global operations requires its own effort. Assess the security risk that global operations pose to critical assets. Consider the unique assets, threats, and vulnerabilities that come with operations in high-risk jurisdictions. Focus on the business activities you support and integrate your insights with existing risk management practices to ensure the controls you propose get the visibility they need. Your goal is to build a plan that mitigates the unique security risks that global operations pose and secures critical assets in high-risk areas. Don’t leave security to chance.

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    • Security leaders who support operations in many countries struggle to mitigate security risks to critical assets. Operations in high-risk jurisdictions contend with complex threat environments and security risk scenarios that often require a unique response.
    • Security leaders need to identify critical assets, assess vulnerabilities, catalog threats, and identify the security controls necessary to mitigate related operational risks.

    Common Obstacles

    • Securing operations in high-risk jurisdictions requires additional due diligence. Each jurisdiction involves a different risk context, which complicates efforts to identify, assess, and mitigate security risks to critical assets.
    • Security leaders need to engage the organization with the right questions and identify high-risk vulnerabilities and security risk scenarios to help stakeholders make an informed decision about how to assess and treat the security risks they face in high-risk jurisdictions.

    Info-Tech’s Approach

    Info-Tech has developed an effective approach to protecting critical assets in high-risk jurisdictions.

    This approach includes tools for:

    • Evaluating the security context of your organization’s high-risk jurisdictions.
    • Identifying security risk scenarios unique to high-risk jurisdictions and assessing the exposure of critical assets.
    • Planning and executing a response.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Organizations with global operations must contend with a more diverse set of assets, threats, and vulnerabilities when they operate in high-risk jurisdictions. Security leaders need to take additional steps to secure operations and protect critical assets.

    Business operations in high-risk jurisdictions face a more complex security landscape

    Information security risks to business operations vary widely by region.

    The 2022 Allianz Risk Barometer surveyed 2,650 business risk specialists in 89 countries to identify the most important risks to operations. The report identified cybercrime, IT failures, outages, data breaches, fines, and penalties as the most important global business risks in 2022, but their results varied widely by region. The standout finding of the 2022 Allianz Risk Barometer is the return of security risks as the most important threat to business operations. Security risks will continue to be acute beyond 2022, especially in Africa, the Middle East, Europe, and the Asia-Pacific region, where they will dwarf risks of supply chain interruptions, natural catastrophe, and climate change.

    Global operations in high-risk jurisdictions contend with more diverse threats. These security risk scenarios are not captured in traditional security strategies.

    The image contains a picture of the world map that has certain areas of the map highlighted in various shades of blue based on higher security-related business risks.

    Figures represent the number of cybersecurity risks business risk specialists selected as a percentage of all business risks (Allianz, 2022). Higher scores indicate jurisdictions with higher security-related business risks. Jurisdictions without data are in grey.

    Different jurisdictions’ commitment to cybersecurity also varies widely, which increases security risks further

    The Global Cybersecurity Index (GCI) provides insight into the commitment of different countries to cybersecurity.

    The index assesses a country’s legal framework to identify basic requirements that public and private stakeholders must uphold and the legal instruments prohibiting harmful actions.

    The 2020 GCI results show overall improvement and strengthening of the cybersecurity agenda globally, but significant regional gaps persist. Of the 194 countries surveyed:

    • 33% had no data protection legislation.
    • 47% had no breach notification measures in place.
    • 50% had no legislation on the theft of personal information.
    • 19% still had no legislation on illegal access.

    Not every jurisdiction has the same commitment to cybersecurity. Protecting critical assets in high-risk jurisdictions requires additional due diligence.

    The image contains a picture of the world map that has certain areas of the map highlighted in various shades of blue based on scores in relation to the Global Security Index.

    The diagram sets out the score and rank for each country that took part in the Global Cybersecurity Index (ITU, 2021)

    Higher scores show jurisdictions with a lower rank on the CGI, which implies greater risk. Jurisdictions without data are in grey.

    Securing critical assets in high-risk jurisdictions requires additional effort

    Traditional approaches to security strategy may miss these key risk scenarios.

    As a result, security leaders who support operations in many countries need to take additional steps to mitigate security risks to critical assets.

    Guide stakeholders to make informed decisions about how to assess and treat the security risks and secure operations.

    • Engage the organization with the right questions.
    • Identify critical assets and assess vulnerabilities.
    • Catalogue threats and build risk scenarios.
    • Identify the security controls necessary to mitigate risks.

    Work with your organization to analyze the threat landscape, assess security risks unique to high-risk jurisdictions, and execute a response to mitigate them.

    This project blueprint works through this process using the two most prevalent risk scenarios in high-risk jurisdictions: high-risk travel and compliance risk.

    Key Risk Scenarios

    • High-Risk Travel
    • Compliance Risk
    • Insider Threat
    • Advanced Persistent Threat
    • Commercial Surveillance
    The image contains a screenshot of an Info-Tech thought model regarding secure global operations in high-risk jurisdictions.

    Travel risk is the first scenario we use as an example throughout the blueprint

    • This project blueprint outlines a process to identify, assess, and mitigate key risk scenarios in high-risk jurisdictions. We use two common key risk scenarios as examples throughout the deck to illustrate how you create and assess your own scenarios.
    • Supporting high-risk travel is the first scenario we will study in-depth as an example. Business growth, service delivery, and mergers and acquisitions can lead end users to travel to high-risk jurisdictions where staff, devices, and data are at risk.
    • Compromised or stolen devices can provide threat actors with access to data that could compromise the organization’s strategic, economic, or competitive advantage or expose the organization to regulatory risk.

    The project blueprint includes template guidance in Phase 3 to help you build and deploy your own travel guidelines to protect critical assets and support end users before they leave, during their trip, and when they return.

    Before you leave

    • Identify high-risk countries.
    • Enable controls.
    • Limit what you pack.

    During your trip

    • Assume you are monitored.
    • Limit access to systems.
    • Prevent theft.

    When you return

    • Change your password.
    • Restore your devices.

    Compliance risk is the second scenario we use as an example

    • Mitigating compliance risk is the second scenario we will study as an example in this blueprint. The legal and regulatory landscape is evolving rapidly to keep step with the pace of technological change. Security and privacy leaders are expected to mitigate the risk of noncompliance as the organization expands to new jurisdictions.
    • Later sections will show how to think through at least four compliance risks, including:
      • Cross-border data transfer
      • Third-party risk management
      • Data breach notification
      • Data residency

    The project blueprint includes template guidance in Phase 3 to help you deploy your own compliance governance controls as a risk mitigation measure.

    Secure Operations in High-Risk Jurisdictions: Info-Tech’s methodology

    1. Identify Context

    2. Assess Risks

    3. Execute Response

    Phase Steps

    1. Assess business requirements
    2. Evaluate security pressures
    1. Identify risks
    2. Assess risk exposure
    1. Treat security risks
    2. Build initiative roadmap

    Phase Outcomes

    • Internal security pressures that capture the governance, policies, practices, and risk tolerance of the organization
    • External security pressures that capture the expectations of customers, regulators, legislators, and business partners
    • A heatmap that captures not only the global exposure of your critical assets but also the business processes they support
    • A security risk register to allow for the easy transfer of critical assets’ global security risk data to your organization’s enterprise risk management practice
    • A roadmap of prioritized initiatives to apply relevant controls and secure global assets
    • A set of key risk indicators to monitor and report your progress

    Blueprint deliverables

    Each step of this blueprint is accompanied by supporting deliverables to help you accomplish your goals:

    Business Security Requirements

    Identify the context for the global security risk assessment, including risk appetite and risk tolerance.

    Jurisdictional Risk Register and Heatmap

    Identify critical global assets and the threats they face in high-risk jurisdictions and assess exposure.

    Mitigation Plan

    Roadmap of initiatives and security controls to mitigate global risks to critical assets. Tools and templates to address key security risk scenarios.

    Key deliverable:

    Jurisdictional Risk Register and Heatmap

    Use the Jurisdictional Risk Register and Heatmap Tool to capture information security risks to critical assets in high-risk jurisdictions. The tool generates a world chart that illustrates the risks global operations face to help you engage the business and execute a response.

    Blueprint benefits

    Protect critical assets in high-risk jurisdictions

    IT Benefits

    Assess and remediate information security risk to critical assets in high-risk jurisdictions.

    Easily integrate your risk assessment with enterprise risk assessments to improve communication with the business.

    Illustrate key information security risk scenarios to make the case for action in terms the business understands.

    Business Benefits

    Develop mitigation plans to protect staff, devices, and data in high-risk jurisdictions.

    Support business growth in high-risk jurisdictions without compromising critical assets.

    Mitigate compliance risk to protect your organization’s reputation, avoid fines, and ensure business continuity.

    Quantify the impact of securing global operations

    The tool included with this blueprint can help you measure the impact of implementing the research

    • Use the Jurisdictional Risk Register and Heatmap Tool to describe the key risk scenarios you face, assess their likelihood and impact, and estimate the cost of mitigating measures. Working through the project in this way will help you quantify the impact of securing global operations.
    The image contains a screenshot of Info-Tech's Jurisdictional Risk Register and Heatmap Tool. The image contains a screenshot of the High-Risk Travel Jurisdiction.

    Establish Baseline Metrics

    • Review existing information security and risk management metrics and the output of the tools included with the blueprint.
    • Identify metrics to measure the impact of your risk management efforts. Focus specifically on high-risk jurisdictions.
    • Compare your results with those in your overall security and risk management program.

    ID

    Metric

    Why is this metric valuable?

    How do I calculate it?

    1.

    Overall Exposure – High-Risk Jurisdictions

    Illustrates the overall exposure of critical assets in high-risk jurisdictions.

    Use the Jurisdictional Risk Register and Heatmap Tool. Calculate the impact times the probability rating for each risk. Take the average.

    2.

    # Risks Identified – High-Risk Jurisdictions

    Informs risk tolerance assessments.

    Use the Jurisdictional Risk Register and Heatmap Tool.

    3.

    # Risks Treated – High-Risk Jurisdictions

    Informs residual risk assessments.

    Use the Jurisdictional Risk Register and Heatmap Tool.

    4.

    Mitigation Cost – High-Risk Jurisdictions

    Informs cost-benefit analysis to determine program effectiveness.

    Use the Jurisdictional Risk Register and Heatmap Tool.

    5.

    # Security Incidents – High-Risk Jurisdictions

    Informs incident trend calculations to determine program effectiveness.

    Draw the information from your service desk or IT service management tool.

    6.

    Incident Remediation Cost – High-Risk Jurisdictions

    Informs cost-benefit analysis to determine program effectiveness.

    Estimate based on cost and effort, including direct and indirect cost such as business disruptions, administrative finds, reputational damage, etc.

    7.

    TRENDS: Program Effectiveness – High-Risk Jurisdictions

    # of security incidents over time. Remediation : Mitigation costs over time

    Calculate based on metrics 5 to 7.

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs.

    DIY Toolkit

    "Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful."

    Guided Implementation

    "Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track."

    Workshop

    "We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place."

    Consulting

    "Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project."

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks are used throughout all four options.

    Guided Implementation

    What does a typical GI on this topic look like?

    Phase 1

    Call #1: Scope project requirements, determine assessment scope, and discuss challenges.

    Phase 2

    Call #2: Conduct initial risk assessment and determine risk tolerance.

    Call #3: Evaluate security pressures in high-risk jurisdictions.

    Call #4: Identify risks in high-risk jurisdictions.

    Call #5: Assess risk exposure.

    Phase 3

    Call #6: Treat security risks in high-risk jurisdictions.

    A Guided Implementation (GI) is a series of calls with an Info-Tech analyst to help implement our best practices in your organization. A typical GI is between 8 to 12 calls over the course of 4 to 6 months.

    Workshop Overview

    Contact your account representative for more information. workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8889

    Days 1

    Days 2-3

    Day 4

    Day 5

    Identify Context

    Key Risk Scenarios

    Build Roadmap

    Next Steps and Wrap-Up (offsite)

    Activities

    1.1.1 Determine assessment scope.

    1.1.2 Determine business goals.

    1.1.3 Identify compliance obligations.

    1.2.1 Determine risk appetite.

    1.2.2 Conduct pressure analysis.

    2.1.1 Identify assets.

    2.1.2 Identify threats.

    2.2.1 Assess risk likelihood.

    2.2.2 Assess risk impact.

    3.1.1 Identify and assess risk response.

    3.1.2 Assess residual risks.

    3.2.1 Identify security controls.

    3.2.2 Build initiative roadmap.

    5.1 Complete in-progress deliverables from previous four days.

    5.2 Set up review time for workshop deliverables and to discuss next steps.

    Deliverables

    1. Business requirements for security risk assessment
    2. Identification of high-risk jurisdictions
    3. Security threat landscape for high-risk jurisdictions
    1. Inventory of relevant threats, critical assets, and their vulnerabilities
    2. Assessment of adverse effects should threat agents exploit vulnerabilities
    3. Risk register with key risk scenarios and heatmap of high-risk jurisdictions
    1. Action plan to mitigate key risk scenarios
    2. Investment and implementation roadmap
    1. Completed information security risk assessment for two key risk scenarios
    2. Risk mitigation roadmap

    No safe jurisdictions

    Stakeholders sometimes ask information security and privacy leaders to produce a list of safe jurisdictions from which to operate. We need to help them see that there are no safe jurisdictions, only relatively risky ones. As you build your security program, deepen the scope of your risk assessments to include risk scenarios critical assets face in different jurisdictions. These risks do not need to rule out operations, but they may require additional mitigation measures to keep staff, data, and devices safe and reduce potential reputational harms.

    Traditional approaches to security strategy often omit jurisdictional risks.

    Global operations must contend with a more complex security landscape. Secure critical assets in high-risk jurisdictions with a targeted risk assessment.

    The two greatest risks are high-risk travel and compliance risk.

    You can mitigate them with small adjustments to your security program.

    Support High-Risk Travel

    When securing travel to high-risk jurisdictions, you must consider personnel safety as well as data and device security. Put measures and guidelines in place to protect them before, during, and after travel.

    Mitigate Compliance Risk

    Think through data residency requirements, data breach notification, cross-border data transfer, and third-party risks to support business growth and mitigate compliance risks in high-risk jurisdictions to protect your organization’s reputation and avoid hefty fines or business disruptions.

    Phase 1

    Identify Context

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Assess business requirements to understand the goals of the organization’s global operations, as well as its risk governance, policies, and practices.
    • Evaluate jurisdictional security pressures to understand threats to critical assets and capture the expectations of external stakeholders, including customers, regulators, legislators, and business partners, and assess risk tolerance.

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • Business stakeholders
    • IT leadership
    • Security team
    • Risk and Compliance

    Step 1.1

    Assess Business Requirements

    Activities

    1.1.1 Determine assessment scope

    1.1.2 Identify enterprise goals in high-risk jurisdictions

    1.1.3 Identify compliance obligations

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Business stakeholders
    • IT leadership
    • Security team
    • Risk and Compliance

    Outcomes of this step

    • Assess business requirements to understand the goals of the organization’s global operations, as well as its risk governance, policies, and practices.

    Focus the risk assessment on high-risk jurisdictions

    Traditional approaches to information security strategy often miss threats to global operations

    • Successful security strategies are typically sensitive to risks to different IT systems and lines of business.
    • However, securing global operations requires additional focus on high-risk jurisdictions, considering what makes them unique.
    • This first phase of the project will help you evaluate the business context of operations in high-risk jurisdictions, including:
      • Enterprise and security goals.
      • Lines of business, physical locations, and IT systems that need additional oversight.
      • Unique compliance obligations.
      • Unique risks and security pressures.
      • Organizational risk tolerance in high-risk jurisdictions.

    Focus your risk assessment on the business activities security supports in high-risk jurisdictions and the unique threats they face to bridge gaps in your security strategy.

    Identify jurisdictions with higher inherent risks

    Your security strategy may not describe jurisdictional risk adequately.

    • Security strategies list lines of business, physical locations, and IT systems the organization needs to secure and those whose security will depend on a third-party. You can find additional guidance on fixing the scope and boundaries of a security strategy in Phase 1 of Build an Information Security Strategy.
    • However, security risks vary widely from one jurisdiction to another according to:
      • Active cyber threats.
      • Legal and regulatory frameworks.
      • Regional security and preparedness capabilities.
    • Your first task is to identify high-risk jurisdictions to target for additional oversight.

    Work closely with your enterprise risk management function.

    Enterprise risk management functions are often tasked with developing risk assessments from composite sources. Work closely with them to complete your own assessment.

    Countries at heightened risk of money laundering and terrorism financing are examples of high-risk jurisdictions. The Financial Action Task Force and the U.S. Treasury publish reports three times a year that identify Non-Cooperative Countries or Territories.

    Develop a robust jurisdictional assessment

    Design an intelligence collection strategy to inform your assessment

    Strategic Intelligence

    White papers, briefings, reports. Audience: C-Suite, board members

    Tactical Intelligence

    Internal reports, vendor reports. Audience: Security leaders

    Operational intelligence

    Indicators of compromise. Audience: IT Operations

    Operational intelligence focuses on machine-readable data used to block attacks, triage and validate alerts, and eliminate threats from the network. It becomes outdated in a matter of hours and is less useful for this exercise.

    Determine travel risks to bolster your assessments

    Not all locations and journeys will require the same security measures.

    • Travel risks vary significantly according to destination, the nature of the trip, and traveler profile.
    • Access to an up-to-date country risk rating system enables your organization and individual staff to quickly determine the overall level of risk in a specific country or location.
    • Based on this risk rating, you can specify what security measures are required prior to travel and what level of travel authorization is appropriate, in line with the organization's security policy or travel security procedures.
    • While some larger organizations can maintain their own country risk ratings, this requires significant capacity, particularly to obtain the necessary information to keep these regularly updated.
    • It may be more effective for your organization to make use of the travel risk ratings provided by an external security information provider, such as a company linked to your travel insurance or travel booking service, if available.
    • Alternatively, various open-source travel risk ratings are available via embassy travel sites or other website providers.

    Without a flexible system to account for the risk exposures of different jurisdictions, staff may perceive measures as a hindrance to operations.

    Develop a tiered risk rating

    The example below outlines potential risk indicators for high-risk travel.

    Rating

    Description

    Low

    Generally secure with adequate physical security. Low violent crime rates. Some civil unrest during significant events. Acts of terrorism rare. Risks associated with natural disasters limited and health threats mainly preventable.

    Moderate

    Periodic civil unrest. Antigovernment, insurgent, or extremist groups active with sporadic acts of terrorism. Staff at risk from common and violent crime. Transport and communications services are unreliable and safety records are poor. Jurisdiction prone to natural disasters or disease epidemics.

    High

    Regular periods of civil unrest, which may target foreigners. Antigovernment, insurgent, or extremist groups very active and threaten political or economic stability. Violent crime rates high, often targeting foreigners. Infrastructure and emergency services poor. May be regular disruption to transportation or communications services. Certain areas off-limits to foreigners. Jurisdictions experiencing natural disasters or epidemics are considered high risk.

    Extreme

    Undergoing active conflict or persistent civil unrest. Risk of being caught up in a violent incident or attack is very high. Authorities may have lost control of significant portions of the country. Lines between criminality and political and insurgent violence are blurred. Foreigners are likely to be denied access to parts of the country. Transportation and communication services are severely degraded or nonexistent. Violence presents a direct threat to staff security.

    Ratings are formulated by assessing several types of risk, including conflict, political/civil unrest, terrorism, crime, and health and infrastructure risks.

    1.1.1 Determine assessment scope

    1 – 2 hours

    1. As a group, brainstorm a list of high-risk jurisdictions to target for additional assessment. Write down as many items as possible to include in:
    • Lines of business
    • Physical locations
    • IT systems

    Pay close attention to elements of the assessment that are not in scope.

  • Discuss the response and the rationale for targeting each of them for additional risk assessments. Identify security-related concerns for different lines of business, locations, user groups, IT systems, and data.
  • Record your responses and your comments in the Information Security Requirements Gathering Tool.
  • Input

    Output

    • Corporate strategy
    • IT strategy
    • Security strategy
    • Relevant threat intelligence
    • A list of high-risk jurisdictions to focus your risk assessment

    Materials

    Participants

    • Laptop
    • Projector
    • Security team
    • IT leadership
    • Business stakeholders
    • Enterprise Risk Management
    • Compliance
    • Legal

    Download the Information Security Requirements Gathering Tool

    Position your efforts in a business context

    Securing critical assets in high-risk jurisdictions is a business imperative

    • Many companies relegate their information security strategies to their IT department. Aside from the strain the choice places on a department that already performs many different functions, it wrongly implies that mitigating information security risk is simply an IT problem.
    • Managing information security risks is a business problem. It requires that organizations identify their risk appetite, prioritize relevant threats, and define risk mitigation initiatives. Business leaders can only do these activities effectively in a context that recognizes the business and financial benefits of implementing protections.
    • This is notably true of businesses with operations in many different countries. Each jurisdiction has its own set of security risks the organization must account for, as well as unique local laws and regulations that affect business operations.
    • In high-risk jurisdictions, your efforts must consider the unique operational challenges your organization may not face in its home country. Your efforts to secure critical assets will be most successful if you describe key risk scenarios in terms of their impact on business goals.
    • You can find additional guidance on assessing the business context of a security strategy in Phase 1 of Build an Information Security Strategy.

    Do you understand the unique business context of operations in high-risk jurisdictions?

    1.1.2 Identify business goals

    Estimated Time: 1-2 hours

    1. As a group, brainstorm the primary and secondary business goals of the organization. Focus your assessment on operations in high-risk jurisdictions you identified in Exercise 1.1.1. Review:
    • Relevant corporate and IT strategies.
    • The business goal definitions and indicator metrics in tab 2, “Goals Definition,” of the Information Security Requirements Gathering Tool.
  • Limit business goals to no more than two primary goals and three secondary goals. This limitation will help you prioritize security initiatives at the end of the project.
  • For each business goal, identify up to two security alignment goals that will support business goals in high-risk jurisdictions.
  • Input

    Output

    • Corporate strategy
    • IT strategy
    • Security strategy
    • Your goals for the security risk assessment for high-risk jurisdictions

    Materials

    Participants

    • Laptop
    • Projector
    • Security team
    • IT leadership
    • Business stakeholders
    • Risk Management
    • Compliance
    • Legal

    Download the Information Security Requirements Gathering Tool

    Record business goals

    Capture the results in the Information Security Requirements Gathering Tool

    1. Record the primary and secondary business goals you identified in tab 3, “Goals Cascade,” of the Information Security Requirements Gathering Tool.
    2. Next, record the two security alignment goals you selected for each business goal based on the tool’s recommendations.
    3. Finally, review the graphic diagram that illustrates your goals on tab 6, “Results,” of the Information Security Requirements Gathering Tool.
    4. Revisit this exercise whenever operations expands to a new jurisdiction to capture how they contribute to the organization’s mission and vision and how the security program can support them.
    The image contains a screenshot of Tab 3, Goals Cascade.

    Tab 3, Goals Cascade

    The image contains a screenshot of Tab 6, Results.

    Tab 6, Results

    Analyze business goals

    Assess how operating in multiple jurisdictions adds nuance to your business goals

    • Security leaders need to understand the direction of the business to propose relevant security initiatives that support business goals in high-risk jurisdictions.
    • Operating in different jurisdictions carries its own degree of risk. The organization is subject not only to the information security risks and legal frameworks of its country of origin but also to those associated with international jurisdictions.
    • You need to understand where your organization operates and how these different jurisdictions contribute to your business goals to support their performance and protect the firm’s reputation.
    • This exercise will make an explicit link between security and privacy concerns in high-risk jurisdictions, what the business cares about, and what security is trying to accomplish.

    If the organization is considering a merger and acquisition project that will expand operations in jurisdictions with different travel risk profiles, the security organization needs to revise the security strategy to ensure the organization can support high-risk travel and mitigate risks to critical assets.

    Identify compliance obligations

    Data compliance obligations loom large in high-risk jurisdictions

    The image contains four hexagons, each with their own words. SOX, PCI DSS, HIPAA, HITECH.

    Security leaders are familiar with most conventional regulatory obligations that govern financial, personal, and healthcare data in North America and Europe.

    The image contains four hexagons, each with their own words. Residency, Cross-Border Transfer, Breach Notification, Third-Party Risk Mgmt.

    Data privacy concerns, nationalism, and the economic value of data are all driving jurisdictions to adopt data residency and data localization and to shut down the cross-border transfer of data.

    The next step requires you to consider the compliance obligations the organization needs to meet to support the business as it expands to other jurisdictions through natural growth, mergers, and acquisitions.

    1.1.3 Identify compliance obligations

    Estimated Time: 1-2 hours

    1. As a group, brainstorm compliance obligations in target jurisdictions. Focus your assessment on operations in high-risk jurisdictions.
    2. Include:

    • Laws
    • Governing regulations
    • Industry standards
    • Contractual agreements
  • Record your compliance obligations and comments on tab 4, “Compliance Obligations,” of the Information Security Requirements Gathering Tool.
  • If you need to take full stock of the laws and regulations in place in the jurisdictions where you operate that you are not familiar with, consider seeking local legal counsel to help you navigate this exercise.
  • Input

    Output

    • Legal and compliance frameworks in target jurisdictions
    • Mandatory and voluntary compliance obligations for target jurisdictions

    Materials

    Participants

    • Laptop
    • Projector
    • Security team
    • IT leadership
    • Business stakeholders
    • Risk Management
    • Compliance
    • Legal

    Download the Information Security Requirements Gathering Tool

    Step 1.2

    Evaluate Security Pressures

    Activities

    1.2.1 Conduct initial risk assessment

    1.2.2 Conduct pressure analysis

    1.2.3 Determine risk tolerance

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Security team
    • Risk and Compliance
    • IT leadership (optional)

    Outcomes of this step

    Identify threats to global assets and capture the security expectations of external stakeholders, including customers, regulators, legislators, and business partners, and determine risk tolerance.

    Evaluate security pressures to set the risk context

    Perform an initial assessment of high-risk jurisdictions to set the context.

    Assess:

    • The threat landscape.
    • The security pressures from key stakeholders.
    • The risk tolerance of your organization.

    You should be able to find the information in your existing security strategy. If you don’t have the information, work through the next three steps of the project blueprint.

    The image contains a diagram to demonstrate evaluating security pressures, as described in the text above.

    Some jurisdictions carry inherent risks

    • Jurisdictional risks stem from legal, regulatory, or political factors that exist in different countries or regions. They can also stem from unexpected legal changes in regions where critical assets have exposure. Understanding jurisdictional risks is critical because they can require additional security controls.
    • Jurisdictional risk tends to be higher in jurisdictions:
      • Where the organization:
        • Conducts high-value or high-volume financial transactions.
        • Supports and manages critical infrastructure.
        • Has high-cost data or data whose compromise could undermine competitive advantage.
        • Has a high percentage of part-time employees and contractors.
        • Experiences a high rate of employee turnover.
      • Where state actors:
        • Have a low commitment to cybersecurity, financial, and privacy legislation and regulation.
        • Support cybercrime organizations within their borders.

    Jurisdictional risk is often reduced to countries where money laundering and terrorist activities are high. In this blueprint, the term refers to the broader set of information security risks that arise when operating in a foreign country or jurisdiction.

    Five key risk scenarios are most prevalent

    Key Risk Scenarios

    • High-Risk Travel
    • Compliance Risk
    • Insider Threat
    • Advanced Persistent Threat
    • Commercial Surveillance

    Security leaders who support operations in many countries need to take additional steps to mitigate security risks to critical assets. The goal of the next two exercises is to analyze the threat landscape and security pressures unique to high-risk jurisdictions, which will inform the construction of key scenarios in Phase 2. These five scenarios are most prevalent in high-risk jurisdictions. Keep them in mind as you go through the exercises in this section.

    1.2.1 Assess jurisdictional risk

    1-3 hours

    1. As a group, review the questions on tab 2, “Risk Assessment,” of the Information Security Pressure Analysis Tool.
    2. Gather the required information from subject matter experts on the following risk elements with a focus on high-risk jurisdictions:
    3. Review each question in tab 2 of the Information Security Pressure Analysis Tool and select the most appropriate response.

    Input

    Output

    • Existing security strategy
    • List of organizational assets
    • Historical data on information security incidents
    • Completed risk assessment

    Materials

    Participants

    • Information Security Pressure Analysis Tool
    • Security team
    • IT leadership
    • Risk Management

    For more information on how to complete the risk assessment questionnaire, see Step 1.2.1 of Build an Information Security Strategy.

    1.2.2 Conduct pressure analysis

    1-3 hours

    1. As a group, review the questions on tab 3, “Pressure Analysis,” of the Information Security Pressure Analysis Tool.
    2. Gather the required information from subject matter experts on the following pressure elements with a focus on high-risk jurisdictions:
    • Compliance and oversight
    • Customer expectations
    • Business expectations
    • IT expectations
  • Review each question in the questionnaire and provide the most appropriate response using the drop-down list. It may be helpful to consult with the appropriate departments to obtain their perspectives.
  • For more information on how to complete the pressure analysis questionnaire, see Step 1.3 of Build an Information Security Strategy.

    Input

    Output

    • Information on various pressure elements within the organization
    • Existing security strategy
    • Completed pressure analysis

    Materials

    Participants

    • Information Security Pressure Analysis Tool
    • Security team
    • IT leadership
    • Business leaders
    • Compliance

    A low security pressure means that your stakeholders do not assign high importance to information security. You may need to engage stakeholders with the right key risk scenarios to illustrate jurisdictional risk and generate support for new security controls.

    Download the Information Security Pressure Analysis Tool

    Assess risk tolerance

    • Risk tolerance expresses the types and amount of risk the organization is willing to accept in pursuit of its goals.
    • These expectations can help you identify, manage, and report on key risk scenarios in high-risk jurisdictions.
    • For instance, an organization with a low risk tolerance will require a stronger information security program to minimize operational security risks.
    • It’s up to business leaders to determine the risks they are willing to accept. They may need guidance to understand how system-level risks affect the organization’s ability to pursue its goals.

    A formalized risk tolerance statement can help:

    • Support risk-based security decisions that align with business goals.
    • Provide a meaningful rationale for security initiatives.
    • Improve the transparency of investments in the organization’s security program.
    • Provide guidance for monitoring inherent risk and residual risk exposure.

    The role of security professionals is to identify and analyze key risk scenarios that may prevent the organization from reaching its goals.

    1.2.3 Determine risk tolerance

    1-3 hours

    1. As a group, review the questions on tab 4, “Risk Tolerance,” of the Information Security Pressure Analysis Tool.
    2. Gather the required information from subject matter experts on the following risk tolerance elements:
    • Recent IT problems, especially downtime and data recovery issues
    • Historical security incidents
  • Review any relevant documentation, including:
    • Existing security strategy
    • Business impact assessments
    • Service-level agreements

    For more information on how to complete the risk tolerance questionnaire, see Step 1.4 of Build an Information Security Strategy.

    Input

    Output

    • Existing security strategy
    • Data on recent IT problems and incidents
    • Business impact assessments
    • Completed risk tolerance statement

    Materials

    Participants

    • Information Security Pressure Analysis Tool
    • Security team
    • IT leadership
    • Risk Management

    Download the Information Security Pressure Analysis Tool

    Review the output of the results tab

    • The organizational risk assessment provides a high-level assessment of inherent risks in high-risk jurisdictions. Use the results to build and assess key risk scenarios in Phase 2.
    • Use the security pressure analysis to inform stakeholder management efforts. A low security pressure indicates that stakeholders do not yet grasp the impact of information security on organizational goals. You may need to communicate its importance before you discuss additional security controls.
    • Jurisdictions in which organizations have a low risk tolerance will require stronger information security controls to minimize operational risks.
    The image contains a screenshot of the organizational risk assessment. The image contains a screenshot of the security pressure analysis. The image contains a screenshot of the risk tolerance curve.

    Phase 2

    Assess Security Risks to Critical Assets

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Identify critical assets, their vulnerabilities to relevant threats, and the adverse impact a successful threat event would have on the organization.
    • Assess risk exposure of critical assets in high-risk jurisdictions for each risk scenario through an analysis of its likelihood and impact.

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • Security team
    • Risk and Compliance
    • IT leadership (optional)

    Step 2.1

    Identify Risks

    Activities

    2.1.1 Identify assets

    2.1.2 Identify threats

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Security team
    • Risk and Compliance
    • IT leadership (optional)

    Outcomes of this step

    • Define risk scenarios that identify critical assets, their vulnerabilities to relevant threats, and the adverse impact a successful threat event would have on the organization.

    This blueprint focuses on mitigating jurisdictional risks

    The image contains a screenshot of the IT Risk Management Framework. The framework includes: Risk Identification, Risk Assessment, Risk Response, and Risk Governance.

    For a deeper dive into building a risk management program, see Info-Tech’s core project blueprints on risk management:

    Build an IT Risk Management Program

    Combine Security Risk Management Components Into One Program

    Draft key risk scenarios to illustrate adverse events

    Risk scenarios help decision-makers understand how adverse events affect business goals.

    • Risk-scenario building is the process of identifying the critical factors that contribute to an adverse event and crafting a narrative that describes the circumstances and consequences if it were to happen.
    • Risk scenarios set up the risk analysis stage of the risk assessment process. They are narratives that describe in detail:
      • The asset at risk.
      • The threat that can act against the asset.
      • Their intent or motivation.
      • The circumstances and threat actor model associated with the threat event.
      • The potential effect on the organization.
      • When or how often the event might occur.

    Risk scenarios are further distilled into a single sentence or risk statement that communicates the essential elements from the scenario.

    Well-crafted risk scenarios have four components

    The second phase of the project will help you craft meaningful risk scenarios

    Threat

    Exploits an

    Asset

    Using a

    Method

    Creating an

    Effect

    An actor capable of harming an asset

    Anything of value that can be affected and results in loss

    Technique an actor uses to affect an asset

    How loss materializes

    Examples: Malicious or untrained employees, cybercriminal groups, malicious state actors

    Examples: Systems, regulated data, intellectual property, people

    Examples: Credential compromise, privilege escalation, data exfiltration

    Examples: Loss of data confidentiality, integrity, or availability; impact on staff health & safety

    Risk scenarios are concise, four to six sentence narratives that describe the core elements of forecasted adverse events. Use them to engage stakeholders with the right questions and guide them to make informed decisions about how to address and treat security risks in high-risk jurisdictions.

    The next slides review five key risk scenarios prevalent in high-risk jurisdictions. Use them as examples to develop your own.

    Travel to high-risk jurisdictions requires special measures to protect staff, devices, and data

    Governmental, academic, and commercial advisors compile lists of jurisdictions that pose greater travel risks annually.

    For instance, in the US, these lists might include countries that are:

    • Subjects of travel warnings by the US Department of State.
    • Identified as high risk by other US government sources such as:
      • The Department of the Treasury Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC).
      • The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).
      • The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI).
    • Compiled from academic and commercial sources, such as Control Risks.

    When securing travel to high-risk jurisdictions, you must consider personnel safety as well as data and device security.

    The image contains a diagram to present high-risk jurisdictions.

    The diagram presents high-risk jurisdictions based on US governmental sources (2021) listed on this slide.

    High-risk travel

    Likelihood: Medium

    Impact: Medium

    Key Risk Scenario #1

    Malicious state actors, cybercriminals, and competitors can threaten staff, devices, and data during travel to high-risk jurisdictions. Device theft or compromise may occur while traveling through airports, accessing hotel computer and phone networks, or in internet cafés or other public areas. Threat actors can exploit data from compromised or stolen devices to undermine the organization’s strategic, economic, or competitive advantage. They can also infect compromised devices with malware that delivers malicious payloads once they reconnect with home networks.

    Threat Actor:

    • Malicious state actors
    • Cybercriminals
    • Competitors

    Assets:

    • Staff
    • IT systems
    • Sensitive data

    Effect:

    • Compromised staff health and safety
    • Loss of data
    • Lost of system integrity

    Methods:

    • Identify, steal, or target mobile devices.
    • Compromise network, wireless, or Bluetooth connections.
    • Leverage stolen devices as a means of infecting other networks.
    • Access devices to track user location.
    • Activate microphones on devices to collect information.
    • Intercept electronic communications users send from high-risk jurisdictions.

    The data compliance landscape is a jigsaw puzzle of data protection and data residency requirements

    Since the EU passed the GDPR in 2016, jurisdictions have turned to data regulations to protect citizen data

    Data privacy concerns, nationalism, and the economic value of data are all driving jurisdictions to adopt data residency, breach notification, and cross-border data transfer regulations. As 2021 wound down to a close, nearly all the world’s 30 largest economies had some form of data regulation in place. The regulatory landscape is shifting rapidly, which complicates operations as organizations grow into new markets or engage in merger and acquisition activities.

    Global operations require special attention to data-residency requirements, data breach notification requirements, and cross-border data transfer regulations to mitigate compliance risk.

    The image contains a diagram to demonstrate the data regulations placed in various places around the world.

    Compliance risk

    Likelihood: Medium

    Impact: High

    Key Risk Scenario #2

    Rapid changes in the privacy and security regulatory landscape threaten organizations’ ability to meet their compliance obligations from local legal and regulatory frameworks. Organizations risk reputational damage, administrative fines, criminal charges, and loss of market share. In extreme cases, organizations may lose their license to operate in high-risk jurisdictions. Shifts in the regulatory landscape can involve additional requirements for data residency, cross-border data transfer, data breach notification, and third-party risk management.

    Threat Actor:

    • Local, regional, and national state actors

    Asset:

    • Reputation, market share
    • License to operate

    Effect:

    • Administrative fines
    • Loss of reputation, brand trust, and consumer loyalty
    • Loss of market share
    • Suspension of business operations
    • Lawsuits due to collective actions and claims
    • Criminal charges

    Methods:

    • Shifts in the privacy and security regulatory landscape, including requirements for:
      • Data residency.
      • Cross-border data transfer.
      • Data breach notification.
      • Third-party security and privacy risk management.

    The incidence of insider threats varies widely by jurisdiction in unexpected ways

    On average, companies in North America, the Middle East, and Africa had the most insider incidents in 2021, while those in the Asia-Pacific region had the least.

    The Ponemon Institute set out to understand the financial consequences that result from insider threats and gain insight into how well organizations are mitigating these risks.

    In the context of this research, insider threat is defined as:

    • Employee or contractor negligence.
    • Criminal or malicious insider activities.
    • Credential theft (imposter risk).

    On average, the total cost to remediate insider threats in 2021 was US$15.4 million per incident.

    In all regions, employee or contractor negligence occurred most frequently. Organizations in North America and in the Middle East and Africa were most likely to experience insider threat incidents in 2021.

    the image contains a diagram of the world, with various places coloured in different shades of blue.

    The diagram represents the average number of insider incidents reported per organization in 2021. The results are analyzed in four regions (Ponemon Institute, 2022)

    Insider threat

    Likelihood: Low to Medium

    Impact: High

    Key Risk Scenario #3

    Malicious insiders, negligent employees, and credential thieves can exploit inside access to information systems to commit fraud, steal confidential or commercially valuable information, or sabotage computer systems. Insider threats are difficult to identify, especially when security is geared toward external threats. They are often familiar with the organization’s data and intellectual property as well as the methods in place to protect them. An insider may steal information for personal gain or install malicious software on information systems. They may also be legitimate users who make errors and disregard policies, which places the organization at risk.

    Threat Actor:

    • Malicious insiders
    • Negligent employees
    • Infiltrators

    Asset:

    • Sensitive data
    • Employee credentials
    • IT systems

    Effects:

    • Loss of system integrity
    • Loss of data confidentiality
    • Financial loss

    Methods:

    • Infiltrators may compromise credentials.
    • Malicious or negligent insiders may use corporate email to steal or share sensitive data, including:
      • Regulated data.
      • Intellectual property.
      • Critical business information.
    • Malicious agents may facilitate data exfiltration, as well as open-port and vulnerability scans.

    The risk of advanced persistent threats is more prevalent in Central and South America and the Asia-Pacific region

    Attacks from advanced persistent threat (APT) actors are more sophisticated than traditional ones.

    • More countries will use legal indictments as part of their cyber strategy. Exposing toolsets of APT groups carried out at the governmental level will drive more states to do the same.
    • Expect APTs to increasingly target network appliances like VPN gateways as organizations continue to sustain hybrid workforces.
    • The line between APTs and state-sanctioned ransomware groups is blurring. Expect cybercriminals to wield better tools, mount more targeted attacks, and use double-extortion tactics.
    • Expect more disruption and collateral damage from direct attacks on critical infrastructure.

    Top 10 Significant Threat Actors:

    • Lazarus
    • DeathStalker
    • CactusPete
    • IAmTheKing
    • TransparentTribe
    • StrongPity
    • Sofacy
    • CoughingDown
    • MuddyWater
    • SixLittleMonkeys

    Top 10 Targets:

    • Government
    • Banks
    • Financial Institutions
    • Diplomatic
    • Telecommunications
    • Educational
    • Defense
    • Energy
    • Military
    • IT Companies
    The image contains a world map coloured in various shades of blue.
    Top 12 countries targeted by APTs (Kaspersky, 2020)

    Track notable APTs to revise your list of high-risk jurisdictions and review the latest tactics and techniques

    Governmental advisors track notable APT actors that pose greater risks.

    The CISA Shields Up site, SANS Storm Center site, and MITRE ATT&CK group site provide helpful and timely information to understand APT risks in different jurisdictions.

    The following threat actors are currently associated with cyberattacks affiliated with the Russian government.

    Activity Group

    Risks

    APT28 (GRU)

    Known as Fancy Bear, this threat group has been tied to espionage since 2004. They compromised the Hillary Clinton campaign, amid other major events.

    APT29 (SVT)

    Tied to espionage since 2008. Reportedly compromised the Democratic National Committee in 2015. Cited in the 2021 SolarWinds compromise.

    Buhtrap/RTM Group

    Group focused on financial targets since 2014. Currently known to target Russian and Ukrainian banks.

    Gamaredon

    Operating in Crimea. Aligned with Russian interests. Has previously targeted Ukrainian government officials and organizations.

    DEV-0586

    Carried out wiper malware attacks on Ukrainian targets in January 2022.

    UNC1151

    Active since 2016. Linked to information operation campaigns and the distribution of anti-NATO material.

    Conti

    Most successful ransomware gang of 2021, with US$188M revenue. Supported Russian invasion of Ukraine, threatening attacks on allied critical infrastructure.

    Sources: MITRE ATT&CK; Security Boulevard, 2022; Reuters, 2022; The Verge, 2022

    Advanced persistent threat

    Likelihood: Low to Medium

    Impact: High

    Key Risk Scenario #4

    Advanced persistent threats are state actors or state-sponsored affiliates with the means to avoid detection by anti-malware software and intrusion detection systems. These highly-skilled and persistent malicious agents have significant resources with which to bypass traditional security controls, establish a foothold in the information technology infrastructure, and exfiltrate data undetected. APTs have the resources to adapt to a defender’s efforts to resist them over time. The loss of system integrity and data confidentiality over time can lead to financial losses, business continuity disruptions, and the destruction of critical infrastructure.

    Threat Actor:

    • State actors
    • State-sponsored affiliates

    Asset:

    • Sensitive data
    • IT systems
    • Critical infrastructure

    Effects:

    • Loss of system integrity
    • Loss of data confidentiality
    • Financial loss
    • Business continuity disruptions
    • Infrastructure destruction

    Methods:

    • Persistent, consistent attacks using the most advanced threats and tactics to bypass security defenses.
    • The goal of APTs is to maintain access to networks for prolonged periods without being detected.
    • The median dwell time differs widely between regions. FireEye reported the mean dwell time for 2018:
      • Americas: 71 days
      • Europe, Middle East, and Africa: 177 days
      • Asia-Pacific: 204 days
    Sources: Symantec, 2011; FireEye, 2019

    Threat agents have deployed invasive technology for commercial surveillance in at least 76 countries since 2015

    State actors and their affiliates purchased and used invasive spyware from companies in Europe, Israel, and the US.

    • “Customers are predominantly repressive regimes looking for new ways to control the flow of information and stifle dissent. Less than 10% of suspected customers are considered full democracies by the Economist Intelligence Unit.” (Top10VPN, 2021)
    • Companies based in economically developed and largely democratic states are profiting off the technology.
    • The findings demonstrate the need to consider geopolitical realities when assessing high-risk jurisdictions and to take meaningful action to increase layered defenses against invasive malware.
    • Spyware is having an increasingly well-known impact on civil society. For instance, since 2016, over 50,000 individual phone numbers have been identified as potential targets by NSO Group, the Israeli manufacturers of the notorious Pegasus Spyware. The target list contained the phone numbers of politicians, journalists, activists, doctors, and academics across the world.
    • The true number of those affected by spyware is almost impossible to determine given that many fall victim to the technology and do not notice.
    The image contains a map of the world with various countries highlighted in shades of blue.

    Countries where commercial surveillance tools have been deployed (“Global Spyware Market Index,” Top10VPN, 2021)

    The risks and effects of spyware vary greatly

    Spyware can steal mundane information, track a user’s every move, and everything in between.

    Adware

    Software applications that display advertisements while the program is running.

    Keyboard Loggers

    Applications that monitor and record keystrokes. Malicious agents use them to steal credentials and sensitive enterprise data.

    Trojans

    Applications that appear harmless but inflict damage or data loss to a system.

    Mobile Spyware

    Surveillance applications that infect mobile devices via SMS or MMS channels, though the most advanced can infect devices without user input.

    State actors and their affiliates use system monitors to track browsing habits, application usage, and keystrokes and capture information from devices’ GPS location data, microphone, and camera. The most advanced system monitor spyware, such as NSO Group’s Pegasus, can infect devices without user input and record conversations from end-to-end encrypted messaging systems.

    Commercial surveillance

    Likelihood: Low to Medium

    Impact: Medium

    Key Risk Scenario #5

    Malicious agents can deploy malware on end-user devices with commercial tools available off the shelf to secretly monitor the digital activity of users. Attacks exploit widespread vulnerabilities in telecommunications protocols. They occur through email and text phishing campaigns, malware embedded in untested applications, and sophisticated zero-click attacks that deliver payloads without requiring user interactions. Attacks target sensitive as well as mundane information. They can be used to track employee activities, investigate criminal activity, or steal credentials, credit card numbers, or other personally identifiable information.

    Threat Actor:

    • State actors
    • State-sponsored affiliates

    Asset:

    • Sensitive data
    • Staff health and safety
    • IT systems

    Effects:

    • Data breaches
    • Loss of data confidentiality
    • Increased risk to staff health and safety
    • Misuse of private data
    • Financial loss

    Methods:

    • Email and text phishing attacks that delivery malware payloads
    • Sideloading untested applications from a third-party source rather than an official retailer
    • Sophisticated zero-click attacks that deliver payloads without requiring user interaction

    Use the Jurisdictional Risk Register and Heatmap Tool

    The tool included with this blueprint can help you draft risk scenarios and risk statements in this section.

    The risk register will capture a list of critical assets and their vulnerabilities, the threats that endanger them, and the adverse effect your organization may face.

    The image includes two screenshots of the jurisdictional risk register and heatmap tool. The image contains a screenshot of the High-Risk Travel Jurisdiction.

    Download the Jurisdictional Risk Register and Heatmap Tool

    2.1.1 Identify assets

    1 – 2 hours

    1. As a group, consider critical or mission-essential functions in high-risk jurisdictions and the systems on which they depend. Brainstorm a list of the organization’s mission-supporting assets in high-risk jurisdictions. Consider:
    • Staff
    • Critical IT systems
    • Sensitive data
    • Critical operational processes
  • On a whiteboard, brainstorm the potential adverse effect of malicious agents in high-risk jurisdictions compromising critical assets. Consider the impact on:
    • Information systems.
    • Sensitive or regulated data.
    • Staff health and safety.
    • Critical operations and objectives.
    • Organizational finances.
    • Reputation and brand loyalty

    Threat

    Exploits an

    Asset

    Using a

    Method

    Creating an

    Effect

    Inputs for risk scenario identification

    Input

    Output

    • Corporate strategy
    • IT strategy
    • Security strategy
    • Business impact analyses
    • A list of the organization’s mission-supporting assets

    Materials

    Participants

    • Laptop
    • Projector
    • Whiteboard
    • Security team
    • IT leadership
    • System owner
    • Enterprise Risk Management

    Threat

    Exploits an

    Asset

    Using a

    Method

    Creating an

    Effect

    Inputs for risk scenario identification

    The image contains an example of the activity mentioned in the text above.

    Model threats to narrow the range of scenarios

    Motives and capabilities to perform attacks on critical assets vary across different threat actors.

    Category

    Actions

    Motivation

    Sophistication

    Nation-states

    Cyberespionage, cyberattacks

    Geopolitical

    High. Dedicated resources and personnel, extensive planning and coordination.

    Proxy organizations

    Espionage, destructive attacks

    Geopolitical, Ideological, Profit

    Moderate. Some planning and support functions and technical expertise.

    Cybercrime

    Theft, fraud, extortion

    Profit

    Moderate. Some planning and support functions and technical expertise.

    Hacktivists

    Disrupt operations, attack brands, release sensitive data

    Ideological

    Low. Rely on widely available tools that require little skill to deploy.

    Insiders

    Destruction or release of sensitive data, theft, exposure through negligence

    Incompetence, Discontent

    Internal access. Acting on their own or in concert with any of the above.

    • Criminals, hacktivists, and insiders vary in sophistication. Some criminal groups demonstrate a high degree of sophistication; however, a large cyber event that damages critical infrastructure does not align with their incentives to make money at minimal risk.
    • Proxy actors conduct offensive cyber operations on behalf of a beneficiary. They may be acting on behalf of a competitor, national government, or group of individuals.
    • Nation-states engage in long-term espionage and offensive cyber operations that support geopolitical and strategic policy objectives.

    2.1.2 Identify threats

    1 – 2 hours

    1. Review the outputs from activity 1.1.1 and activity 2.1.1.
    2. Identify threat agents that could undermine the security of critical assets in high-risk jurisdictions. Include internal and external actors.
    3. Assess their motives, means, and opportunities.
    • Which critical assets are most attractive? Why?
    • What paths and vulnerabilities can threat agents exploit to reach critical assets without going through a control?
    • How could they defeat existing controls? Draw on the MITRE framework to inform your analysis.
    • Once agents defeat a control, what further attack can they launch?

    Threat

    Exploits an

    Asset

    Using a

    Method

    Creating an

    Effect

    Inputs for risk scenario identification

    Input

    Output

    • Jurisdictional assessment from activity 1.1.1
    • Critical assets from activity 2.1.1
    • Potential vulnerabilities from:
      • Security control gap analysis
      • Security risk register
    • Threat intelligence
    • MITRE framework
    • A list of critical assets, threat agents, vulnerabilities, and potential attack vectors.

    Materials

    Participants

    • Laptop
    • Projector
    • Whiteboard
    • Security team
    • Infrastructure & Operations team
    • Enterprise Risk Management

    2.1.2 Identify threats (continued)

    1 – 2 hours

    1. On a whiteboard, brainstorm how threat agents will exploit vulnerabilities in critical assets to reach their goal. Redefine attack vectors to capture what could result from a successful initial attack.

    For example:

    • State actors and cybercriminals may steal or compromise end-user devices during travel to high-risk jurisdictions using malware they embed in airport charging stations, internet café networks, or hotel business centers.
    • Compromised devices may infect corporate networks and threaten sensitive data once they reconnect to them.

    Threat

    Exploits an

    Asset

    Using a

    Method

    Creating an

    Effect

    The image contains a screenshot of activity 2.1.2 as described in the text above.

    Bring together the critical risk elements into a single risk scenario

    Summarize the scenario further into a single risk statement

    Risk Scenario: High-Risk Travel

    State actors and cybercriminals can threaten staff, devices, and data during travel to high-risk jurisdictions. Device theft or compromise may occur while traveling through airports, accessing hotel computer and phone networks, or in internet cafés or other public areas. Threat actors can exploit data from compromised or stolen devices to undermine the organization’s strategic, economic, or competitive advantage. They can also infect compromised devices with malware that delivers malicious payloads once they reconnect with home networks.

    Risk Statement

    Cybercriminals compromise end-user devices during travel to high-risk jurisdictions, jeopardizing staff safety and leading to loss of sensitive data.

    Risk Scenario: Compliance Risk

    Rapid changes in the privacy and security regulatory landscape threaten an organization’s ability to meet its compliance obligations from local legal and regulatory frameworks. Organizations that fail to do so risk reputational damage, administrative fines, criminal charges, and loss of market share. In extreme cases, organizations may lose their license to operate in high-risk jurisdictions. Shifts in the regulatory landscape can involve additional requirements for data residency, cross-border data transfer, data breach notification, and third-party risk management.

    Risk Statement

    Rapid changes in the privacy and security regulations landscape threaten our ability to remain compliant, leading to reputational and financial loss.

    Fill out the Jurisdictional Risk Register and Heatmap Tool

    The tool is populated with data from two key risk scenarios: high-risk travel and compliance risk.

    The image includes two screenshots of the Jurisdictional Risk Register and Heatmap Tool.

    1. Label the risk in Tab 3, Column B.
    2. Record your risk scenario in Tab 3, Column C.
    3. Record your risk statement in Tab 3, Column D.
    4. Identify the applicable jurisdictions in Tab 3, Column E.
    5. You can further categorize the scenario as:
      • an enterprise risk (Column G).
      • an IT risk (Column H).

    Download the Jurisdictional Risk Register and Heatmap Tool

    Step 2.2

    Assess Risk Exposure

    Activities

    2.2.1 Identify existing controls

    2.2.2 Assess likelihood and impact

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Security team
    • Risk and Compliance
    • IT leadership (optional)

    Outcomes of this step

    • Assess risk exposure for each risk scenario through an analysis of its likelihood and impact.

    Brush up on risk assessment essentials

    The next step will help you prioritize IT risks based on severity.

    Likelihood of Occurrence X Likelihood of Impact = Risk Severity

    Likelihood of occurrence: How likely the risk is to occur.

    Likelihood of impact: The likely impact of a risk event.

    Risk severity: The significance of the risk.

    Evaluate risk severity against the risk tolerance thresholds and the cost of risk response.

    Identify existing controls before you proceed

    Existing controls will reduce the inherent likelihood and impact of the risk scenario you face.

    Existing controls were put in place to avoid, mitigate, or transfer key risks your organization faced in the past. Without considering existing controls, you run the risk of overestimating the likelihood and impact of the risk scenarios your organization faces in high-risk jurisdictions.

    For instance, the ability to remote-wipe corporate-owned devices will reduce the potential impact of a device lost or compromised during travel to high-risk jurisdictions.

    As you complete the risk assessment for each scenario, document existing controls that reduce their inherent likelihood and impact.

    2.2.1 Document existing controls

    6-10 hours

    1. Document the Risk Category and Existing Controls in the Jurisdictional Risk Register and Heatmap Tool.
      • Tactical controls apply to individual risks only. For instance, the ability to remote-wipe devices mitigates the impact of a device lost in a high-risk jurisdiction.
      • Strategic controls apply to multiple risks. For instance, deploying MFA for critical applications mitigates the likelihood that malicious actors can compromise a lost device and impedes their access in devices they do compromise.

    Input

    Output

    • Risk scenarios
    • Existing controls for risk scenarios

    Materials

    Participants

    • Jurisdictional Risk Register and Heatmap Tool
    • Laptop
    • Projector
    • Security team
    • IT leadership
    • Business stakeholders
    • Enterprise Risk Management

    Download the Jurisdictional Risk Register and Heatmap Tool.

    Assess the risk scenarios you identified in Phase 1

    The risk register is the central repository for risks in high-risk jurisdictions.

    • Use the second tab of the Jurisdictional Risk Register and Heatmap Tool to create likelihood, impact, and risk tolerance assessment scales to evaluate every risk event effectively.
    • Severity-level assessment is a “first pass” of your risk scenarios that will reveal your organization’s most severe risks in high-risk jurisdictions.
    • You can incorporate expected cost calculations into your evaluation to assess scenarios in greater detail.
    • Expected cost represents how much you would expect to pay in an average year for each risk event. Expected cost calculations can help compare IT risks to non-IT risks that may not use the same scales and communicate system-level risk to the business in a language they will understand.

    Expected cost calculations may not be practical. Determining robust likelihood and impact values to produce cost estimates can be challenging and time consuming. Use severity-level assessments as a first pass to make the case for risk mitigation measures and take your lead from stakeholders.

    The image contains two screenshots of the Jurisdictional Risk Register and Heatmap Tool.

    Use the Jurisdictional Risk Register and Heatmap Tool to capture and analyze your data.

    2.2.2 Assess likelihood and impact

    6-10 hours

    1. Assign each risk scenario a likelihood of occurrence and a likely impact level that represents the impact of the scenario on the whole organization considering existing controls. Record your results in Tab 3, column R and S, respectively.
    2. You can further dissect likelihood and impact into component parameters but focus first on total likelihood and impact to keep the task manageable.
    3. As you input the first few likelihood and impact values, compare them to one another to ensure consistency and accuracy. For instance, is a device lost in a high-risk jurisdiction truly more impactful than a device compromised with commercial surveillance software?
    4. The tool will calculate the probability of risk exposure based on the likelihood and consequence associated with the scenario. The results are published in Tab 3, Column T.

    Input

    Output

    • Risk scenarios
    • Assessed the likelihood of occurrence and impact for all identified risk events

    Materials

    Participants

    • Jurisdictional Risk Register and Heatmap Tool
    • Laptop
    • Projector
    • Security team
    • IT leadership
    • Business stakeholders
    • Enterprise Risk Management

    Download the Jurisdictional Risk Register and Heatmap Tool.

    Refine your risk assessment to justify your estimates

    Document the rationale behind each value and the level of consensus in group discussions.

    Stakeholders will likely ask you to explain some of the numbers you assigned to likelihood and impact assessments. Pointing to an assessment methodology will give your estimates greater credibility.

    • Assign one individual to take notes during the assessment exercise.
    • Have them document the main rationale behind each value and the level of consensus.

    The goal is to develop robust intersubjective estimates of the likelihood and impact of a risk scenario.

    We assigned a 50% likelihood rating to a risk scenario. Were we correct?

    Assess the truth of the following statements to test likelihood assessments. In this case, do these two statements seem true?

    • The risk event will likely occur once in the next two years, all things being equal.
    • In two nearly identical organizations, one out of two will experience the risk event this year.
    The image includes a screenshot of the High-Risk Travel Jurisdictions.

    Phase 3

    Execute Response

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Prioritize and treat global risks to critical assets based on their value and exposure.
    • Build an initiative roadmap that identifies and applies relevant controls to protect critical assets. Identify key risk indicators to monitor progress.

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • Security team
    • Risk and Compliance
    • IT leadership (optional)

    Step 3.1

    Treat Security Risks

    Activities

    3.1.1 Identify and assess risk response

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Security team
    • Risk and Compliance
    • IT leadership (optional)

    Outcomes of this step

    • Prioritize and treat global risks to critical assets based on their value and exposure.

    Analyze and select risk responses

    The next step will help you treat the risk scenarios you built in Phase 2.

    Identify

    Identify risk responses.

    Predict

    Predict the effectiveness of the risk response, if implemented, by estimating the residual likelihood and impact of the risk.

    Calculate

    The tool will calculate the residual severity of the risk after applying the risk response.

    The first part of the phase outlines project activities. The second part elaborates on high-risk travel and compliance risk, the two key risk scenarios we are following throughout the project. Use the Jurisdictional Risk Register and Heatmap Tool to capture your work.

    Analyze likelihood and impact to identify response

    The image contains a diagram of he risk response analysis. Risk Transfer and Risk Avoidance has the most likelihood, and Risk Acceptance and Risk Mitigation have the most impact. Risk Avoidance has the most likelihood and most impact in regards to risk response.

    3.1.1 Identify and assess risk response

    Complete the following steps for each risk scenario.

    1. Identify a risk response action that will help reduce the likelihood of occurrence or the impact if the scenario were to occur. Indicate the type of risk response (avoidance, mitigation, transfer, acceptance, or no risk exists).
    2. Assign each risk response action a residual likelihood level and a residual impact level. This is the same step you performed in Activity 2.2.2, but you are now are estimating the likelihood and impact of the risk event after you implemented the risk response action successfully. The Jurisdictional Risk Register and Heatmap Tool will generate a residual risk severity level for each risk event.
    3. Identify the potential Risk Action Owner (Project Manager) if the response is selected and turned into an IT project, and document this in the Jurisdictional Risk Register and Heatmap Tool .
    4. For each risk event, document risk response actions, residual likelihood and impact levels, and residual risk severity level.

    Input

    Output

    • Risk scenarios from Phase 2
    • Risk scenario mitigation plan

    Materials

    Participants

    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • Jurisdictional Risk Register and Heatmap Tool
    • Security team
    • Risk and Compliance
    • IT leadership (optional)

    Download the Jurisdictional Risk Register and Heatmap Tool

    Step 3.2

    Mitigate Travel Risk

    Activities

    3.2.1 Develop a travel policy

    3.2.2 Develop travel procedures

    3.2.3 Design high-risk travel guidelines

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Security team
    • Risk and Compliance
    • IT leadership (optional)

    Outcomes of this step

    • Prioritize and treat global risks to critical assets based on their value and exposure.

    Identify controls to mitigate jurisdictional risk

    This section provides guidance on the most prevalent risk scenarios identified in Phase 2 and provides a more in-depth examination of the two most prevalent ones, high-risk travel and compliance risk. Determine the appropriate response to each risk scenario to keep global risks to critical assets aligned with the organization’s risk tolerance.

    Key Risk Scenarios

    • High-Risk Travel
    • Compliance Risk
    • Insider Threat
    • Advanced Persistent Threat
    • Commercial Surveillance

    Travel risk is a common concern in organizations with global operations

    • The security of staff, devices, and data is one of the biggest challenges facing organizations with a global footprint. Working and traveling in unpredictable environments will aways carry a degree of risk, but organizations can do much to develop a safer and more secure working environment.
    • Compromised or stolen devices can provide threat actors with access to data that could compromise the organization’s strategic, economic, or competitive advantage or expose the organization to regulatory risk.
    • For many organizations, security risk assessments, security plans, travel security procedures, security training, and incident reporting systems are a key part of their operating language.
    • The following section provides a simple structure to help organizations demystify travel in high-risk jurisdictions.

    The image contains a diagram to present high-risk jurisdictions.

    Before you leave

    • Identify high-risk countries.
    • Enable controls.
    • Limit what you pack.

    During your trip

    • Assume you are monitored.
    • Limit access to systems.
    • Prevent theft.

    When you return

    • Change your password.
    • Restore your devices.

    Case study

    Higher Education: Camosun College

    Interview: Evan Garland

    Frame additional security controls as a value-added service.

    Situation

    The director of the international department at Camosun College reached out to IT security for additional support. Department staff often traveled to hostile environments. They were concerned malicious agents would either steal end-user devices or compromise them and access sensitive data. The director asked IT security for options that would better protect traveling staff, their devices, and the information they contain.

    Challenges

    First, controls would need to admit both work and personal use of corporate devices. Staff relied exclusively on work devices for travel to mitigate the risk of personal device theft. Personal use of corporate devices during travel was common. Second, controls needed to strike the right balance between friction and effortless access. Traveling staff had only intermittent access to IT support. Restrictive controls could prevent them from accessing their devices and data altogether.

    Solution

    IT consulted staff to discuss light-touch solutions that would secure devices without introducing too much complexity or compromising functionality. They then planned security controls that involved user interaction and others that did not and identified training requirements.

    Results

    Controls with user interaction

    Controls without user interaction

    • Multifactor authentication for college systems and collaboration platforms
    • Password manager for both work and personal use for staff for stronger passwords and practices
    • Security awareness training to help traveling staff identify potential threats while traveling through airports or accessing public Wi-Fi.
    • Drive encryption and always-on VPN to protect data at rest and in transit
    • Increased setting for phishing and spam filtering for traveling staff email
    • Enhanced anti-malware/endpoint detection and response (EDR) solution for traveling laptops

    Build a program to mitigate travel risks

    There is no one-size-fits-all solution.

    The most effective solution will take advantage of existing risk management policies, processes, and procedures at your organization.

    • Develop a framework. Outline the organization’s approach to high-risk travel, including the policies, procedures, and mechanisms put in place to ensure safe travel to high-risk jurisdictions.
    • Draft a policy. Outline the organization’s risk attitude and key security principles and define roles and responsibilities. Include security responsibilities and obligations in job descriptions of staff members and senior managers.
    • Provide flexible options. Inherent travel risk will vary from one jurisdiction to another. You will likely not find an approach that works for every case. Establish locally relevant measures and plans in different security contexts and risk environments.
    • Look for quick wins. Identify measures or requirements that you can establish quickly but that can have a positive effect on the security of staff, data, and devices.
    • Monitor and review. Undertake periodic reviews of the organization’s security approach and management framework, as well as their implementation, to ensure the framework remains effective.

    3.2.1 Develop a travel policy

    1. Work with your business leaders to build a travel policy for high-risk jurisdictions. The policy should be a short and accessible document structured around four key sections:
      • A statement on the importance of staff security and safety, the scope of the policy, and who it applies to (staff, consultants, contractors, volunteers, visitors, accompanying dependants, etc.).
      • A principles section explaining the organization’s security culture, risk attitude, and the key principles that shape the organization’s approach to staff security and safety.
      • A responsibilities section setting out the organization’s security risk management structure and the roles and actions allocated to specific positions.
      • A minimal security requirements section establishing the specific security requirements that must be in place in all locations and specific locations.
    2. Common security principles include:
    • Shared responsibility – Managing risks to staff is a shared organizational responsibility.
    • Acknowledgment of risk – Managing security will not remove all risks. Staff need to appreciate, as part of their informed consent, that they are still exposed to risk.
    • Primacy of life – Staff safety is of the highest importance. Staff should never place themselves at excessive risk to meet program objectives or protect property.
    • Proportionate risk – Risks must be assessed to ensure they are proportionate to the benefits organizational activities provide and the ability to manage those risks.
    • Right to withdraw – Staff have the right to withdraw from or refuse to take up work in a particular area due to security concerns.
    • No right to remain – The organization has the right to suspend activities that it considers too dangerous.
  • Cross-reference the organization’s other governing policies that outline requirements related to security risk management, such as the health and safety policy, access control policy, and acceptable use of security assets.
  • Input

    Output

    • List of high-risk jurisdictions
    • Risk scenarios from Phase 2
    • Data inventory and data flows
    • Travel policy for high-risk jurisdictions

    Materials

    Participants

    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • Jurisdictional Risk Register and Heatmap Tool
    • Security team
    • Legal team
    • IT leadership
    • Risk Management

    Develop security plans for high-risk travel

    Security plans advise staff on how to manage the risk identified in assessments.

    Security plans are key country documents that outline the security measures and procedures in place and the responsibilities and resources required to implement them. Security plans should be established in high-risk jurisdictions where your organization has a regular, significant presence. Security plans must remain relevant and accessible documents that address the specific risks that exist in that location, and, if appropriate, are specific about where the measures apply and who they apply to. Plans should be updated regularly, especially following significant incidents or changes in the operating environment or activities.

    Key Components

    Critical information – One-page summary of pertinent information for easy access and quick reference (e.g. curfew times, no-go areas, important contacts).

    Overview – Purpose and scope of the document, responsibilities for security plan, organization’s risk attitude, date of completion and review date, and a summary of the security strategy and policy.

    Current Context – Summary of current operating context and overall security situation; main risks to staff, assets, and operations; and existing threats and risk rating.

    Procedures – Simple security procedures that staff should adhere to in order to prevent incidents and how to respond should problems arise. Standard operating procedures (SOPs) should address key risks identified in the assessment.

    Security levels – The organization's security levels/phases, with situational indicators that reflect increasing risks to staff in that context and location and specific actions/measures required in response to increasing insecurity.

    Incident reporting – The procedures and responsibilities for reporting security-related incidents; for example, the type of incidents to be reported, the reporting structure, and the format for incident reporting.

    Determine travel risk

    Tailor your risk response to the security risk assessment you conducted in earlier stages of this project.

    Ratings are formulated by assessing several types of risk, including conflict, political/civil unrest, terrorism, crime, and health and infrastructure risks.

    Rating

    Description (Examples)

    Recommended Action

    Low

    Generally secure with adequate physical security. Low violent crime rates. Some civil unrest during significant events. Acts of terrorism rare. Risks associated with natural disasters limited and health threats mainly preventable.

    Basic personal security, travel, and health precautions required.

    Moderate

    Periodic civil unrest. Antigovernment, insurgent, or extremist groups active with sporadic acts of terrorism. Staff at risk from common and violent crime. Transport and communications services are unreliable and safety records are poor. Jurisdiction prone to natural disasters or disease epidemics.

    Increased vigilance and routine security procedures required.

    High

    Regular periods of civil unrest, which may target foreigners. Antigovernment, insurgent, or extremist groups very active and threaten political or economic stability. Violent crime rates high and targeting of foreigners is common. Infrastructure and emergency services poor. May be regular disruption to transportation or communications services. Certain areas off-limits to foreigners. Jurisdictions experiencing a natural disaster or a disease epidemic are considered high risk.

    High level of vigilance and effective, context-specific security precautions required.

    Extreme

    Undergoing active conflict or persistent civil unrest. Risk of being caught up in a violent incident or attack is very high. Civil authorities may have lost control of significant portions of the country. Lines between criminality and political and insurgent violence are blurred. Foreigners are likely to be denied access to significant parts of the country. Transportation and communication services are severely degraded or non-existent. Violence presents a direct threat to staff security.

    Stringent security precautions essential and may not be sufficient to prevent serious incidents.

    Program activities may be suspended and staff withdrawn at very short notice.

    3.2.2 Develop travel procedures

    1. Work with your business leaders to build travel procedures for high-risk jurisdictions. The procedures should be tailored to the risk assessment and address the risk scenarios identified in Phase 2.
    2. Use the categories outlined in the next two slides to structure the procedure. Address all types of travel, detail security measures, and outline what the organization expects of travelers before, during, and after their trip.
    3. Consider the implementation of special measures to limit the impact of a potential security event, including:
      • Information end-user device loaner programs.
      • Temporary travel service email accounts.
    4. Specify what happens when staff add personal travel to their work trip to cover issues such as insurance, check-in, actual travel times, etc.
    5. Discuss the rationale for each procedure. Ensure the components align with the policy statements outlined in the high-risk travel policy developed in the previous step.

    Input

    Output

    • List of high-risk jurisdictions
    • Risk scenarios from Phase 2
    • High-risk travel policy
    • Travel procedures for high-risk jurisdictions

    Materials

    Participants

    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • Jurisdictional Risk Register and Heatmap Tool
    • Security team
    • Legal team
    • IT leadership
    • Risk Management

    Draft procedures to mitigate travel risks

    Address all types of travel, detail security measures, and outline what the organization expects of travelers before, during, and after their trip

    Introduction

    Clarifies who the procedures apply to. Highlights any differences in travel security requirements or support provided to staff, consultants, partners, and official visitors.

    Travel risk ratings

    Explains the travel or country risk rating system, how staff access the information, the different categories and indicators, and their implications.

    Roles and responsibilities

    Clarifies the responsibilities of travelers, their line managers or contact points, and senior management regarding travel security and how this changes for destinations with higher risk ratings.

    Travel authorization

    Stipulates who in the organization authorizes travel, the various compliance measures required, and how this changes for destinations with higher risk ratings.

    Travel risk assessment

    Explains when travel risk assessments are required, the template that should be used, and who approves the completed assessments.

    Travel security procedures should specify what happens when staff add personal travel to their work trip to cover issues such as insurance, check-in, actual travel times, etc.

    Pre-travel briefings

    Outlines the information that must be provided to travelers prior to departure, the type of briefing required and who provides it, and how these requirements change as risk ratings increase.

    Security training

    Explain security training required prior to travel. This may vary depending on the country’s risk rating. Includes information on training waiver system, including justifications and authorization.

    Traveler profile forms

    Travelers should complete a profile form, which includes personal details, emergency contacts, medical details, social media footprint, and proof-of-life questions (in contexts where there are abduction risks).

    Check-in protocol

    Specifies who travelers must maintain contact with while traveling and how often, as well as the escalation process in case of loss of contact. The frequency of check-ins should reflect the increase in the risk rating for the destination.

    Emergency procedures

    Outlines the organization's emergency procedures for security and medical emergencies.

    3.2.3 Design high-risk travel guidelines

    • Supplement the high-risk travel policies and procedures with guidelines to help international travelers stay safe.
    • The document is intended for an end-user audience and should reflect your organization’s policies and procedures for the use of information and information systems during international travel.
    • Use the Digital Safety Guidelines for International Travel template in concert with this blueprint to provide guidance on what end users can do to stay safe before they leave, during their trip, and when they return.
    • Consider integrating the guidelines into specialized security awareness training sessions that target end users who travel to high-risk jurisdictions.
    • The guidelines should supplement and align with existing technical controls.

    Input

    Output

    • List of high-risk jurisdictions
    • Risk scenarios from Phase 2
    • High-risk travel policy
    • High-risk travel procedure
    • Travel guidelines for high-risk jurisdictions

    Materials

    Participants

    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • Jurisdictional Risk Register and Heatmap Tool
    • Security team
    • Legal team
    • IT leadership
    • Risk Management

    Download the Digital Safety Guidelines for International Travel template

    Step 3.3

    Mitigate Compliance Risk

    Activities

    3.3.1 Identify data localization obligations

    3.3.2 Integrate obligations into IT system design

    3.3.3 Document data processing activities

    3.3.4 Choose the right mechanism

    3.3.5 Implement the appropriate controls

    3.3.6 Identify data breach notification obligations

    3.3.7 Integrate data breach notification into incident response

    3.3.8 Identify vendor security and data protection requirements

    3.3.9 Build due diligence questionnaire

    3.3.10 Build appropriate data processing agreement

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Security team
    • Risk and Compliance
    • IT leadership (optional)

    Outcomes of this step

    • Prioritize and treat global risks to critical assets based on their value and exposure.

    Compliance risk is a prevalent risk in organizations with a global footprint

    • The legal and regulatory landscape is evolving rapidly to keep step with the pace of technological change. Security and privacy leaders are expected to mitigate the risk of noncompliance as the organization expands to new jurisdictions.
    • Organizations with a global footprint must stay abreast of local regulations and provide risk management guidance to business leaders to support global operations.
    • This sections describes four compliance risks in this context:
      • Cross-border data transfer
      • Third-party risk management
      • Data breach notification
      • Data residency

    Compliance with local obligations

    Likelihood: Medium to High

    Impact: High

    Data Residency

    Gap Controls

    • Identify and document the data localization obligations for the jurisdictions that the organization is operating in.
    • Design and implement IT systems that satisfy the data localization requirements.
    • Comply with data localization obligations within each jurisdiction.

    Heatmap of Global Data Residency Regulations

    The image contains a screenshot of a picture of a world map with various shades of blue to demonstrate the heatmap of global data residency regulations.
    Source: InCountry, 2021

    Examples of Data Residency Requirements

    Country

    Data Type

    Local Storage Requirements

    Australia

    Personal data – heath record

    My Health Records Act 2012

    China

    Personal information — critical information infrastructure operators

    Cybersecurity law

    Government cloud data

    Opinions of the Office of the Central Leading Group for Cyberspace Affairs on Strengthening Cybersecurity Administration of Cloud Computing Services for Communist Party and Government Agencies

    India

    Government email data

    The Public Records Act of 1993

    Indonesia

    Data held by electronic system operator for the public service

    Regulation 82 concerning “Electronic System and Transaction Operation”

    Germany

    Government cloud service data

    Criteria for the procurement and use of cloud services by the federal German administration

    Russia

    Personal data

    The amendments of Data Protection Act No. 152 FZ

    Vietnam

    Data held by internet service providers

    The Decree on Management, Provision, and Use of Internet Services and Information Content Online (Decree 72)

    US

    Government cloud service data

    Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Network Penetration Reporting and Contracting for Cloud Services (DFARS Case 2013-D018)

    3.3.1 Identify data localization obligations

    1-2 hours

    1. Work with your business leaders to identify and document the jurisdictions where your organization is operating in or providing services and products to consumers within.
    2. Work with your legal team to identify and document all relevant data localization obligations for the data your organization generates, collects, and processes in order to operate your business.
    3. Record your data localization obligations in the table below.

    Jurisdiction

    Relevant Regulations

    Local Storage Requirements

    Date Type

    Input

    Output

    • List of jurisdictions your organization is operating in
    • Relevant security and data protection regulations
    • Data inventory and data flows
    • Completed list of data localization obligations

    Materials

    Participants

    • Guidelines for Compliance With Local Security and Privacy Laws Template
    • Privacy team
    • Security team
    • Legal team
    • IT leadership
    • Risk Management

    Download the Guidelines for Compliance With Local Security and Privacy Laws Template

    3.3.2 Integrate obligations into your IT system design

    1-2 hours

    1. Work with your IT department to design the IT architecture and systems to satisfy the data localization requirements.
    2. The table below provides a checklist for integrating privacy considerations into your IT systems.

    Item

    Consideration

    Answer

    Supporting Document

    1

    Have you identified business services that process data that will be subject to localization requirements?

    2

    Have you identified IT systems associated with the business services mentioned above?

    3

    Have you established a data inventory (i.e. data types, business purposes) for the IT systems mentioned above?

    4

    Have you established a data flow diagram for the data identified above?

    5

    Have you identified the types of data that should be stored locally?

    6

    Have you confirmed whether a copy of the data locally stored will satisfy the obligations?

    7

    Have you confirmed whether an IT redesign is needed or whether modifications (e.g. adding a server) to the IT systems would satisfy the obligations?

    8

    Have you confirmed whether access from another jurisdiction is allowed?

    9

    Have you identified how long the data should be stored?

    Input

    Output

    • Data localization obligations
    • Business services that process data that will be subject to localization requirements
    • IT systems associated with business services
    • Data inventory and data flows
    • Completed checklist of localization obligations for IT system design

    Materials

    Participants

    • Guidelines for Compliance With Local Security and Privacy Laws Template
    • Privacy team
    • Security team
    • Legal team
    • IT leadership
    • Risk Management

    Download the Guidelines for Compliance With Local Security and Privacy Laws Template

    Compliance with local obligations

    Likelihood: Medium to High

    Impact: High

    Cross-Border Transfer

    Gap Controls

    • Know where you transfer your data.
    • Identify jurisdictions that your organization is operating in and that impose different requirements for the cross-border transfer of personal data.
    • Adopt and implement a proper cross-border data transfer mechanism in accordance with applicable privacy laws and regulations.
    • Re-evaluate at appropriate intervals.

    Which cross-border transfer mechanism should I choose?

    Transfer Mechanism

    Advantages

    Disadvantages

    Standard Contractual Clauses (SCC)

    • Easy to implement
    • No DPA (data processing agreement) approval
    • Not suitable for complex data transfers
    • Do not meet business agility
    • Needs legal solution

    Binding Corporate Rules (BCRs)

    • Meets business agility needs
    • Raises trust in the organization
    • Doubles as solution for art. 24/25 of the GDPR
    • Sets high compliance maturity level
    • Takes time to draft/implement
    • Requires DPA approval (scrutiny)
    • Requires culture of compliance
    • Approved by one "lead" authority and two other "co-lead“ authorities
    • Takes usually between six and nine months for the approval process only

    Code of Conduct

    • Raises trust in the sector
    • Self-regulation instead of law
    • No code of conduct approved yet
    • Takes time to draft/implement
    • Requires DPA approval and culture of compliance
    • Needs of organization may not be met

    Certification

    • Raises trust in the organization
    • No certification schemes available yet
    • Risk of compliance at minimum necessary
    • Requires audits

    Consent

    • Legal certainty
    • Transparent
    • Administrative burden
    • Some data subjects are incapable of consenting all or nothing

    3.3.3 Document data processing activities

    1-2 hours

    1. Identify and document the following information:
      • Name of business process
      • Purposes of processing
      • Lawful basis
      • Categories of data subjects and personal data
      • Data subject categories
      • Which system the data resides in
      • Recipient categories
      • Third country/international organization
      • Documents for appropriate safeguards for international transfer (adequacy, SCCs, BCRs, etc.)
      • Description of mitigating measures

    Input

    Output

    • Name of business process
    • Categories of personal data
    • Which system the data resides
    • Third country/international organization
    • Documents for appropriate safeguards for international transfer
    • Completed list of data processing activities

    Materials

    Participants

    • Guidelines for Compliance With Local Security and Privacy Laws Template
    • Privacy team
    • Security team
    • Legal team
    • IT leadership
    • Risk Management

    Download the Guidelines for Compliance With Local Security and Privacy Laws Template

    3.3.4 Choose the right mechanism

    1-2 hours

    1. Identify jurisdictions that your organization is operating in and that impose different requirements for the cross-border transfer of personal data. For example, the EU’s GDPR and China’s Personal Information Protection Law require proper cross-border transfer mechanisms before the data transfers. Your organization should decide which cross-border transfer mechanism is the best fit for your cross-border data transfer scenarios.
    2. Use the following table to identify and document the pros and cons of each data transfer mechanism and the final decision.

    Data Transfer Mechanism

    Pros

    Cons

    Final Decision

    SCC

    BCR

    Code of Conduct

    Certification

    Consent

    Input

    Output

    • List of relevant data transfer mechanisms
    • Assessment of the pros and cons of each mechanism
    • Final decision regarding which data transfer mechanism is the best fit for your organization

    Materials

    Participants

    • Guidelines for Compliance With Local Security and Privacy Laws Template
    • Privacy team
    • Security team
    • Legal team
    • IT leadership
    • Risk Management

    Download the Guidelines for Compliance With Local Security and Privacy Laws Template

    3.3.5 Implement the appropriate controls

    1-3 hours

    • One of the most common mechanisms is standard contractual clauses (SCCs).
    • Use Info-Tech’s Standard Contractual Clauses Template to facilitate your cross-border transfer activities.
    • Identify and check whether the following core components are covered in your SCC and record the results in the table below.
    # Core Components Status Note
    1 Purpose and scope
    2 Effect and invariability of the Clauses
    3 Description of the transfer(s)
    4 Data protection safeguards
    5 Purpose limitation
    6 Transparency
    7 Accuracy and data minimization
    8 Duration of processing and erasure or return of data
    9 Storage limitation
    10 Security of processing
    11 Sensitive data
    12 Onward transfers
    13 Processing under the authority of the data importer
    14 Documentation and compliance
    15 Use of subprocessors
    16 Data subject rights
    17 Redress
    18 Liability
    19 Local laws and practices affecting compliance with the Clauses
    20 Noncompliance with the Clauses and termination
    21 Description of data processing activities, such as list of parties, description of transfer, etc.
    22 Technical and organizational measures
    InputOutput
    • Description of the transfer(s)
    • Duration of processing and erasure or return of data
    • Onward transfers
    • Use of subprocessors
    • Etc.
    • Draft of the standard contractual clauses (SCC)
    MaterialsParticipants
    • Guidelines for Compliance With Local Security and Privacy Laws Template
    • Legal team
    • Privacy team
    • Security team
    • IT leadership
    • Risk Management

    Download the Guidelines for Compliance With Local Security and Privacy Laws Template

    Compliance with local obligations

    Likelihood: High

    Impact: Medium to High

    Data Breach

    Gap Controls

    • Identify jurisdictions that your organization is operating in and that impose different obligations for data breach reporting.
    • Document the notification obligations for various business scenarios, such as controller to DPA, controller to data subject, and processor to controller.
    • Integrate breach notification obligations into security incident response process.

    Examples of Data Breach Notification Obligations

    Location

    Regulation/ Standard

    Reporting Obligation

    EU

    GDPR

    72 hours

    China

    PIPL

    Immediately

    US

    HIPAA

    No later than 60 days

    Canada

    PIPEDA

    As soon as feasible

    Global

    PCI DSS

    • Visa – immediately after breach discovered
    • Mastercard – within 24 hours of discovering breach
    • American Express – immediately after breach discovered

    Summary of US State Data Breach Notification Statutes

    The image contains a graph to show the summary of the US State Data Breach Notification Statutes.

    Source: Davis Wright Tremaine

    3.3.6 Identify data breach notification obligations

    1-2 hours

    1. Identify jurisdictions that your organization is operating in and that impose different obligations for data breach reporting.
    2. Document the notification obligations for various business scenarios, such as controller to DPA, controller to data subject, and processor to controller.
    3. Record your data breach obligations in the table below.
    Region Regulation/Standard Reporting Obligation

    Input

    Output

    • List of regions and jurisdictions your business is operating in
    • List of relevant regulations and standards
    • Documentation of data breach reporting obligations in applicable jurisdictions

    Materials

    Participants

    • Guidelines for Compliance With Local Security and Privacy Laws Template
    • Legal team
    • Privacy team
    • Security team
    • IT leadership
    • Risk Management

    Download the Guidelines for Compliance With Local Security and Privacy Laws Template

    3.3.7 Integrate data breach notification into incident response

    1-2 hours

    • Integrate breach notification obligations into the security incident response process. Understand the security incident management framework.
    • All incident runbooks follow the same process: detection, analysis, containment, eradication, recovery, and post-incident activity.
    • The table below provides a basic checklist for you to consider when implementing your data breach and incident handling process.
    # Phase Considerations Status Notes
    1 Prepare Ensure the appropriate resources are available to best handle an incident.
    2 Detect Leverage monitoring controls to actively detect threats.
    3 Analyze Distill real events from false positives.
    4 Contain Isolate the threat before it can cause additional damage.
    5 Eradicate Eliminate the threat from your operating environment.
    6 Recover Restore impacted systems to a normal state of operations.
    7 Report Report data breaches to relevant regulators and data subjects if required.
    8 Post-Incident Activities Conduct a lessons-learned post-mortem analysis.
    InputOutput
    • Security and data protection incident response steps
    • Key considerations for integrating data breach notifications into incident response
    • Data breach notifications integrated into the incident response process
    MaterialsParticipants
    • Guidelines for Compliance With Local Security and Privacy Laws Template
    • Security team
    • Privacy team
    • Legal team
    • IT leadership
    • Risk Management

    Download the Guidelines for Compliance With Local Security and Privacy Laws Template

    Compliance with local obligations

    Likelihood: High

    Impact: Medium to High

    Third-Party Risk

    Gap Controls

    • Build an end-to-end third-party security and privacy risk management process.
    • Perform internal due diligence prior to selecting a service provider.
    • Stipulate the security and privacy protection obligations of the third party in a legally binding document such as contract or data processing agreement, etc.

    End-to-End Third-Party Security and Privacy Risk Management

    1. Pre-Contract
    • Due diligence check
  • Signing of Contract
    • Data processing agreement
  • Post-Contract
    • Continuous monitoring
    • Regular check or audit
  • Termination of Contract
    • Data deletion
    • Access deprovisioning

    Examples of Vendor Security Management Requirements

    Region

    Law/Standard

    Section

    EU

    General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)

    Article 28 (1)

    Article 46 (1)

    US

    Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)

    §164.308(b)(1)

    US

    New York Department of Financial Services Cybersecurity Requirements

    500.11(a)

    Global

    ISO 27002:2013

    15.1.1

    15.1.2

    15.1.3

    15.2.1

    15.2.2

    US

    NIST 800-53

    SA-12

    SA-12 (2)

    US

    NIST Cybersecurity Framework

    ID-SC-1

    ID-SC-2

    ID-SC-3

    ID-SC-4

    Canada

    OSFI Cybersecurity Guidelines

    4.25

    4.26

    3.3.8 Identify vendor security and data protection requirements

    1-2 hours

    • Effective vendor security risk management is an end-to-end process that includes assessment, risk mitigation, and periodic reassessments.
    • An efficient and effective assessment process can only be achieved when all stakeholders are participating.
    • Identify and document your vendor security and data protection requirements in the table below.
    Region Law/Standard Section Requirements

    Input

    Output

    • List of regions and jurisdictions your business is operating in
    • List of relevant regulations and standards
    • Documentation of vendor security and data protection obligations in applicable jurisdictions

    Materials

    Participants

    • Guidelines for Compliance With Local Security and Privacy Laws Template
    • Legal team
    • Privacy team
    • Security team
    • IT leadership
    • Risk Management

    Download the Guidelines for Compliance With Local Security and Privacy Laws Template

    3.3.9 Build due diligence questionnaire

    1-2 hours

    Perform internal due diligence prior to selecting a service provider.

    1. Build and right-size your vendor security questionnaire by leveraging Info-Tech’s Vendor Security Questionnaire template.
    2. Document your vendor security questionnaire in the table below.
    # Question Vendor Request Vendor Comments
    1 Document Requests
    2 Asset Management
    3 Governance
    4 Supply Chain Risk Management
    5 Identify Management, Authentication, and Access Control
    InputOutput
    • List of regions and jurisdictions your business is operating in
    • List of relevant regulations and standards
    • Business security and data protection requirements and expectations
    • Draft of due diligence questionnaire
    MaterialsParticipants
    • Guidelines for Compliance With Local Security and Privacy Laws Template
    • Legal team
    • Privacy team
    • Security team
    • IT leadership
    • Risk Management

    Download the Guidelines for Compliance With Local Security and Privacy Laws Template

    3.3.10 Build appropriate data processing agreement

    1-2 hours

    1. Stipulate the security and privacy protection obligations of the third party in a legally binding document such as contract or data processing agreement, etc.
    2. Leverage Info-Tech’s Data Processing Agreement Template to put the language into your legally binding document.
    3. Use the table below to check whether core components of a typical DPA are covered in your document.
    # Core Components Status Note
    1 Processing of personal data
    2 Scope of application and responsibilities
    3 Processor's obligations
    4

    Controller's obligations

    5 Data subject requests
    6 Right to audit and inspection
    7 Subprocessing
    8 Data breach management
    9 Security controls
    10 Transfer of personal data
    11 Duty of confidentiality
    12 Compliance with applicable laws
    13 Service termination
    14 Liability and damages
    InputOutput
    • Processing of personal data
    • Processor’s obligations
    • Controller’s obligations
    • Subprocessing
    • Etc.
    • Draft of data processing agreement (DPA)
    MaterialsParticipants
    • Guidelines for Compliance With Local Security and Privacy Laws Template
    • Legal team
    • Privacy team
    • Security team
    • IT leadership
    • Risk Management

    Download the Guidelines for Compliance With Local Security and Privacy Laws Template

    Summary of Accomplishment

    Problem Solved

    By following Info-Tech’s methodology for securing global operations, you have:

    • Evaluated the security context of your organization’s global operations.
    • Identified security risks scenarios unique to high-risk jurisdictions and assessed the exposure of critical assets.
    • Planned and executed a response.

    You have gone through a deeper analysis of two key risk scenarios that affect global operations:

    • Travel to high-risk jurisdictions.
    • Compliance risk.

    If you would like additional support, have our analysts guide you through an Info-Tech workshop or Guided Implementation.

    Contact your account representative for more information.

    workshop@infotech.com

    1-888-670-8889

    Additional Support

    If you would like additional support, have our analysts guide you through other phases as part of an Info-Tech Workshop.

    The image contains a picture of Michel Hebert.

    Contact your account representative for more information.

    workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8889

    To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team. Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech’s historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    The image contains a screenshot of High-Risk Travel Jurisdictions.

    Identify High-Risk Jurisdictions

    Develop requirements to identify high-risk jurisdictions.

    The image contains a screenshot of Build Risk Scenarios.

    Build Risk Scenarios

    Build risk scenarios to capture assets, vulnerabilities, threats, and the potential effect of a compromise.

    External Research Contributors

    Ken Muir

    CISO

    LMC Security

    Premchand Kurup

    CEO

    Paramount Computer Systems

    Preeti Dhawan

    Manager, Security Governance

    Payments Canada

    Scott Wiggins

    Information Risk and Governance

    CDPHP

    Fritz Y. Jean Louis

    CISO

    Globe and Mail

    Eric Gervais

    CIO

    Ovivo Water

    David Morrish

    CEO

    MBS Techservices

    Evan Garland

    Manager, IT Security

    Camosun College

    Jacopo Fumagalli

    CISO

    Axpo

    Dennis Leon

    Governance and Security Manager

    CPA Canada

    Tero Lehtinen

    CIO

    Planmeca Oy

    Related Info-Tech Research

    Build an IT Risk Management Program

    • Build a program to identify, evaluate, assess, and treat IT risks.
    • Monitor and communicate risks effectively to support business decision making.

    Combine Security Risk Management Components Into One Program

    • Develop a program focused on assessing and managing information system risks.
    • Build a governance structure that integrates security risks within the organization’s broader approach to risk management.

    Build an Information Security Strategy

    • Build a holistic, risk-aware strategy that aligns to business goals.
    • Develop a roadmap of prioritized initiatives to implement the strategy over 18 to 36 months.

    Bibliography

    2022 Cost of Insider Threats Global Report.” Ponemon Institute, NOVIPRO, 9 Feb. 2022. Accessed 25 May 22.

    “Allianz Risk Barometer 2022.” Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty, Jan. 2022. Accessed 25 May 22.

    Bickley, Shaun. “Security Risk Management: a basic guide for smaller NGOs”. European Interagency Security Forum (EISF), 2017. Web.

    “Biden Administration Warns against spyware targeting dissidents.” New York Times, 7 Jan 22. Accessed 20 Jan 2022.

    Boehm, Jim, et al. “The risk-based approach to cybersecurity.” McKinsey & Company, October 2019. Web.

    “Cost of a Data Breach Report 2021.” IBM Security, July 2021. Web.

    “Cyber Risk in Asia-Pacific: The Case for Greater Transparency.” Marsh & McLennan Companies, 2017. Web.

    “Cyber Risk Index.” NordVPN, 2020. Accessed 25 May 22

    Dawson, Maurice. “Applying a holistic cybersecurity framework for global IT organizations.” Business Information Review, vol. 35, no. 2, 2018, pp. 60-67.

    “Framework for improving critical infrastructure cybersecurity.” National Institute of Standards and Technology, 16 Apr 2018. Web.

    “Global Cybersecurity Index 2020.” International Telecommunication Union (ITU), 2021. Accessed 25 May 22.

    “Global Risk Survey 2022.” Control Risks, 2022. Accessed 25 May 22.

    “International Travel Guidance for Government Mobile Devices.” Federal Mobility Group (FMG), Aug. 2021. Accessed 18 Nov 2021.

    Kaffenberger, Lincoln, and Emanuel Kopp. “Cyber Risk Scenarios, the Financial System, and Systemic Risk Assessment.” Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, September 2019. Accessed 11 Jan 2022.

    Koehler, Thomas R. Understanding Cyber Risk. Routledge, 2018.

    Owens, Brian. “Cybersecurity for the travelling scientist.” Nature, vol. 548, 3 Aug 2017. Accessed 19 Jan. 2022.

    Parsons, Fintan J., et al. “Cybersecurity risks and recommendations for international travellers.” Journal of Travel Medicine, vol. 1, no. 4, 2021. Accessed 19 Jan 2022.

    Quinn, Stephen, et al. “Identifying and estimating cybersecurity risk for enterprise risk management.” National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Interagency or Internal Report (IR) 8286A, Nov. 2021.

    Quinn, Stephen, et al. “Prioritizing cybersecurity risk for enterprise risk management.” NIST, IR 8286B, Sept. 2021.

    “Remaining cyber safe while travelling security recommendations.” Government of Canada, 27 April 2022. Accessed 31 Jan 2022.

    Stine, Kevin, et al. “Integrating cybersecurity and enterprise risk management.” NIST, IR 8286, Oct. 2020.

    Tammineedi, Rama. “Integrating KRIs and KPIs for effective technology risk management.” ISACA Journal, vol. 4, 1 July 2018.

    Tikk, Eneken, and Mika Kerttunen, editors. Routledge Handbook of International Cybersecurity. Routledge, 2020.

    Voo, Julia, et al. “National Cyber Power Index 2020.” Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School, Sept. 2020. Web.

    Zhang, Fang. “Navigating cybersecurity risks in international trade.” Harvard Business Review, Dec 2021. Accessed 31 Jan 22.

    Appendix

    Insider Threat

    Key Risk Scenario

    Likelihood: Medium to High

    Impact: High

    Gap Controls

    The image contains a picture of the Gap Controls. The controls include: Policy and Awareness, Identification, Monitoring and Visibility, which leads to Cooperation.

    • Identification: Effective and efficient management of insider threats begins with a threat and risk assessment to establish which assets and which employees to consider, especially in jurisdictions associated with sensitive or critical data. You need to pay extra attention to employees who are working in satellite offices in jurisdictions with loose security and privacy laws.
    • Monitoring and Visibility: Organizations should monitor critical assets and groups with privileged access to defend against malicious behavior. Implement an insider threat management platform that provides your organization with the visibility and context into data movement, especially cross-border transfers that might cause security and privacy breaches.
    • Policy and Awareness Training: Insider threats will persist without appropriate action and culture change. Training and consistent communication of best practices will mitigate vulnerabilities to accidental or negligent attacks. Customized training materials using local languages and role-based case studies might be needed for employees in high-risk jurisdictions.
    • Cooperation: An effective insider threat management program should be built with cross-team functions such as Security, IT, Compliance and Legal, etc.

    For more holistic approach, you can leverage our Reduce and Manage Your Organization’s Insider Threat Risk blueprint.

    Info-Tech Insight

    You can’t just throw tools at a human problem. While organizations should monitor critical assets and groups with privileged access to defend against malicious behavior, good management and supervision can help detect attacks and prevent them from happening in the first place.

    Insider threats are not industry specific, but malicious insiders are

    Industry

    Actors

    Risks

    Tactics

    Motives

    State and Local Government

    • Full-time employees
    • Current employees
    • Privileged access to personally identifiable information, financial assets, and physical property
    • Abuse of privileged access
    • Received or transferred fraudulent funds
    • Financial gain
    • Recognition
    • Benefiting foreign entity

    Information Technology

    • Equal mix of former and current employees
    • Privileged access to networks or systems as well as data
    • Highly technical attacks
    • Received or transferred fraudulent funds
    • Revenge
    • Financial gain

    Healthcare

    • Majority were full-time and current employees
    • Privileged access to customer data with personally identifiable information, financial assets
    • Abuse of privileged access
    • Received or transferred fraudulent funds
    • Financial gain
    • Entitlement

    Finance and Insurance

    • Majority were full-time and current employees
    • Authorized users
    • Electronic financial assets
    • Privileged access to customer data
    • Created or used fraudulent accounts
    • Fraudulent purchases
    • Identity theft
    • Financial gain
    • Gambling addiction
    • Family pressures
    • Multiple motivations

    Source: Carnegie Mellon University Software Engineering Institute, 2019

    Advanced Persistent Threat

    Key Risk Scenario #4

    Likelihood: Medium to High

    Impact: High

    Gap Controls

    The image contains a screenshot of the Gap Controls listed: Prevent, Detect, Analyze, Respond.

    Prevent: Defense in depth is the best approach to protect against unknown and unpredictable attacks. Effective anti-malware, diligent patching and vulnerability management, and strong human-centric security are essential.

    Detect: There are two types of companies – those who have been breached and know it, and those who have been breached and don’t know it. Ensure that monitoring, logging, and event detection tools are in place and appropriate to your organizational needs.

    Analyze: Raw data without interpretation cannot improve security and is a waste of time, money, and effort. Establish a tiered operational process that not only enriches data but also provides visibility into your threat landscape.

    Respond: Organizations can’t rely on ad hoc response anymore – don’t wait until a state of panic. Formalize your response processes in a detailed incident runbook to reduce incident remediation time and effort.

    Best practices moving forward

    Defense in Depth

    Lock down your organization. Among other tactics, control administrative privileges, leverage threat intelligence, use IP whitelisting, adopt endpoint protection and two-factor authentication, and formalize incident response measures.

    Block Indicators

    Information alone is not actionable. A successful threat intelligence program contextualizes threat data, aligns intelligence with business objectives, and then builds processes to satisfy those objectives. Actively block indicators and act upon gathered intelligence.

    Drive Adoption

    Create organizational situational awareness around security initiatives to drive adoption of foundational security measures: network hardening, threat intelligence, red-teaming exercises, and zero-day mitigation, policies, and procedures.

    Supply Chain Security

    Security extends beyond your organization. Ensure your organization has a comprehensive view of your organizational threat landscape and a clear understanding of the security posture of any managed service providers in your supply chain.

    Awareness and Training

    Conduct security awareness and training. Teach end users how to recognize current cyberattacks before they fall victim – this is a mandatory first line of defense.

    Additional Resources

    Follow only official sources of information to help you assess risk

    The image contains an image highlighting a few additional resources.

    As misinformation is a major attack vector for malicious actors, follow only reliable sources for cyberalerts and actionable intelligence. Aggregate information from these reliable sources.

    Federal Cyber Agency Alerts

    Informational Resources

    Info-Tech Insight

    The CISA Shields Up site provides the latest cyber risk updates on the Russia-Ukraine conflict and should provide the most value in staying informed.

    Build Your BizDevOps Playbook

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}177|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Architecture & Strategy
    • Parent Category Link: /architecture-and-strategy
    • Today’s rapidly scaling and increasingly complex products create mounting pressure on delivery teams to release new features and changes quickly and with sufficient quality.
    • Many organizations see BizDevOps as a solution to help meet this demand. However, they often lack the critical cross-functional collaboration and team-sport culture that are critical for success.
    • The industry provides little consensus and guidance on how to prepare for the transition to BizDevOps.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • BizDevOps is cultural, not driven by tools. It is about delivering high-quality and valuable releases to stakeholders through collective ownership, continuous collaboration, and team-first behaviors supported by tools.
    • BizDevOps begins with a strong foundation in five key areas. The crux of successful BizDevOps is centered on the strategic adoption and optimization of building great requirements, collaborative practices, iterative delivery, application management, and high-fidelity environments.
    • Teams take STOCK of what it takes to collaborate effectively. Teams and stakeholders must show up, trust the delivery method and people, orchestrate facilitated activities, clearly communicate and knowledge share every time they collaborate.

    Impact and Result

    • Bring the right people to the table. BizDevOps brings significant organizational, process and technology changes to improve delivery effectiveness. Include the key roles in the definition and validation of your BizDevOps vision and practices.
    • Focus on the areas that matter. Review your current circumstances and incorporate the right practices that addresses your key challenges and blockers to becoming BizDevOps.
    • Build your BizDevOps playbook. Gain a broad understanding of the key plays and practices that makes a successful BizDevOps organization. Verify and validate these practices in order to tailor them to your context. Keep your playbook live.

    Build Your BizDevOps Playbook Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Find out why you should implement BizDevOps, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Get started with BizDevOps

    Set the right expectations with your stakeholders and define the context of your BizDevOps implementation.

    • Build Your BizDevOps Playbook – Phase 1: Get Started With BizDevOps
    • BizDevOps Playbook

    2. Tailor your BizDevOps playbook

    Tailor the plays in your BizDevOps playbook to your circumstances and vision.

    • Build Your BizDevOps Playbook – Phase 2: Tailor Your BizDevOps Playbook
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Build Your BizDevOps Playbook

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Set Your Expectations

    The Purpose

    Discuss the goals of your BizDevOps playbook.

    Identify the various perspectives who should be included in the BizDevOps discussion.

    Level set expectations of your BizDevOps implementation.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Identification of the key roles who should be included in the BizDevOps discussion.

    Learning of key practices to support your BizDevOps vision and goals.

    Your vision of BizDevOps in your organization.

    Activities

    1.1 Define BizDevOps.

    1.2 Understand your key stakeholders.

    1.3 Define your objectives.

    Outputs

    Your BizDevOps definition

    List of BizDevOps stakeholders

    BizDevOps vision and objectives

    2 Set the Context

    The Purpose

    Understand the various methods to initiate the structuring of facilitated collaboration.

    Share a common way of thinking and behaving with a set of principles.

    Focus BizDevOps adoption on key areas of software product delivery.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A chosen collaboration method (Scrum, Kanban, Scrumban) to facilitate collaboration

    A mutually understanding and beneficial set of guiding principles

    Areas where BizDevOps will see the most benefit

    Activities

    2.1 Select your foundation method.

    2.2 Define your guiding principles.

    2.3 Focus on the areas that matter.

    Outputs

    Chosen collaboration model

    List of guiding principles

    High-level assessment of delivery practices and its fit for BizDevOps

    3 Tailor Your BizDevOps Playbook

    The Purpose

    Review the good practices within Info-Tech’s BizDevOps Playbook.

    Tailor your playbook to reflect your circumstances.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Understanding of the key plays involved in product delivery

    Product delivery plays that reflect the challenges and opportunities of your organization and support your BizDevOps vision

    Activities

    3.1 Review and tailor the plays in your playbook

    Outputs

    High-level discussion of key product delivery plays and its optimization to support BizDevOps

    Identify and Manage Operational Risk Impacts on Your Organization

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}230|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Vendor Management
    • Parent Category Link: /vendor-management

    More than any other time, our world is changing. As a result, organizations – and their vendors – need to be able to adapt their plans to accommodate risk on an unprecedented level.

    A new threat will impact your organization's operations at some point. Make sure your plans are flexible enough to manage the inevitable consequences and that you understand where those threats may originate.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Identifying and managing a vendor’s potential operational impact on your organization requires multiple people in the organization across several functions. Those people all need coaching on the potential changes in the market and how these changes may affect operations.
    • Organizational leadership is often taken unaware during crises, and their plans lack the flexibility to adjust to significant market upheavals.

    Impact and Result

    Vendor management practices educate organizations on the different potential risks from vendors in your market and suggest creative and alternative ways to avoid and help manage them.

    • Prioritize and classify your vendors with quantifiable, standardized rankings.
    • Prioritize focus on your high-risk vendors.
    • Standardize your processes for identifying and monitoring vendor risks to manage potential impacts with our Operational Risk Impact Tool.

    Identify and Manage Operational Risk Impacts on Your Organization Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Identify and Manage Operational Risk Impacts to Your Organization Storyboard – Use this research to better understand the negative impacts of vendor actions to your brand reputation.

    Use this research to identify and quantify the potential operational impacts caused by vendors. Utilize Info-Tech's approach to look at the operational impact from various perspectives to better prepare for issues that may arise.

    • Identify and Manage Operational Risk Impacts to Your Organization Storyboard

    2. Operational Risk Impact Tool – Use this tool to help identify and quantify the operational impacts of negative vendor actions.

    By playing the “what if” game and asking probing questions to draw out – or eliminate - possible negative outcomes, everyone involved adds their insight into parts of the organization to gather a comprehensive picture of potential impacts.

    • Operational Risk Impact Tool
    [infographic]

    Further reading

    Identify and Manage Operational Risk Impacts on Your Organization

    Understand internal and external vendor risks to avoid potential disaster.

    Analyst perspective

    Organizations need to be aware of the operational damage vendors may cause to plan around those impacts effectively.

    Frank Sewell

    Organizations must be mindful that operational risks come from internal and external vendor sources. Missing either component in the overall risk assessment can significantly impact day-to-day business processes that cost revenue, delay projects, and lead to customer dissatisfaction.

    Frank Sewell,

    Research Director, Vendor Management
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    More than any other time, our world is changing rapidly. As a result, organizations – and their vendors – need to be able to adapt their plans to accommodate risk on an unprecedented level.

    A new threat will impact your organization's operations at some point. Make sure your plans are flexible enough to manage the inevitable consequences and that you understand where those threats may originate.

    Common Obstacles

    Identifying and managing a vendor’s potential operational impact on your organization requires multiple people in the organization across several functions. Those people all need coaching on the potential changes in the market and how these changes may affect operations.

    Organizational leadership is often taken unaware during crises, and their plans lack the flexibility to adjust to significant market upheavals.

    Info-Tech's Approach

    Vendor management practices educate organizations on the different potential risks from vendors in your market and suggest creative and alternative ways to avoid and help manage them.

    Prioritize and classify your vendors with quantifiable, standardized rankings.

    Prioritize focus on your high-risk vendors.

    Standardize your processes for identifying and monitoring vendor risks to manage potential impacts with our Operational Risk Impact Tool.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Organizations must evolve their risk assessments to be more adaptive to respond to threats in the market. Ongoing monitoring of the vendors tied to company operations, and understanding where those vendors impact your operations, is imperative to avoiding disasters.

    Info-Tech’s multi-blueprint series on vendor risk assessment

    There are many individual components of vendor risk beyond cybersecurity.

    There are many components to vendor risk, including: Financial, Reputational, Operational, Strategic, Security, Regulatory & Compliance.

    This series will focus on the individual components of vendor risk and how vendor management practices can facilitate organizations’ understanding of those risks.

    Out of Scope:
    This series will not tackle risk governance, determining overall risk tolerance and appetite, or quantifying inherent risk.

    Operational risk impacts

    Potential losses to the organization due to incidents that affect operations.

    • In this blueprint we’ll explore operational risks, particularly from third-party vendors, and their impacts.
    • Identify potentially disruptive events to assess the overall impact on organizations and implement adaptive measures to identify, manage, and monitor vendor performance.
    Operational

    The world is constantly changing

    The IT market is constantly reacting to global influences. By anticipating changes, leaders can set expectations and work with their vendors to accommodate them.

    When the unexpected happens, being able to adapt quickly to new priorities ensures continued long-term business success.

    Below are some things no one expected to happen in the last few years:

    27%

    Businesses are changing their internal processes around TPRM in response to the Pandemic.

    70%

    Of organizations attribute a third-party breach to too much privileged access.

    85%

    Of breaches involved human factors (phishing, poor passwords, etc.).

    Assess internal and external operational risk impacts

    Due diligence and consistent monitoring are the keys to safeguarding your organization.

    Two sides of the Same Coin

    Internal

    • Poorly vetted supplemental staff
    • Bad system configurations
    • Lack of relevant skills
    • Poor vendor performance
    • Failure to follow established processes
    • Weak contractual accountability
    • Unsupportable or end-of-life system components

    External

    • Cyberattacks
    • Supply Chain Issues
    • Geopolitical Disruptions
    • Vendor Acquisitions
    • N-Party Non-Compliance
    • Vendor Fraud

    Operational risk is the risk of losses caused by flawed or failed processes, policies, systems, or events that disrupt business operations.

    - Wikipedia

    Internal operational risk

    Vendors operating within your secure perimeter can open your organization to substantial risk.

    Frequently monitor your internal process around vendor management to ensure safe operations.

    • Poorly vetted supplemental staff
    • Bad system configurations
    • Lack of relevant skills
    • Poor vendor performance
    • Failure to follow established processes
    • Weak contractual accountability
    • Unsupportable or end-of-life system components

    Info-Tech Insight

    You may have solid policies, but if your employees and vendors are not following them, they will not protect the organization.

    External operational risks

    • Cyberattacks
    • Supplier issues and geopolitical instability
    • Vendor acquisitions
    • N-party vendor non-compliance

    Identify and manage operational risks

    Poorly configured systems

    Failing to ensure that your vendor-supported systems are properly configured and that your vendors are meeting your IT change control and configuration standards is more commonplace than expected. Proper oversight and management of your support vendors are crucial to ensure they are meeting expectations in this regard.

    Failure to follow processes

    Most companies have policies and procedures around IT change and configuration control, security standards, risk management, vendor performance standards, etc. While having these processes is a good start, failure to perform continuous monitoring and management of these leads to increased risks of incidents.

    Supply chain disruptions

    Awareness of the supply chain's complications, and each organization's dependencies, are increasing for everyone. However, most organizations still do not understand the chain of n-party vendors that support their specific vendors or how interruptions in their supply chains could affect them. The 2022 Toyota shutdown due to Kojima is a perfect example of how one essential parts vendor could shut down your operations.

    What to look for

    Identify operational risk impacts

    • Does the vendor have a business continuity plan they will share for your review?
    • Is the vendor operating on old hardware that may be out of warranty or at end of life?
    • Is the vendor operating on older software or shareware that may lack the necessary patches?
    • Does the vendor self-audit, or do they use a vetted third-party audit firm to issue a SOC report annually?
    • Does the vendor have sufficient personnel in acceptable regions to support your operations?
    • Is the vendor willing to make concessions on contractual protections, or are they only offering “one-sided” agreements with “as-is” warranties?

    Operational risks

    Not knowing where your risks come from creates additional risks to operations.

    • Supply chain disruptions and global shortages.
      • Geopolitical disruptions and natural disasters have caused unprecedented interruptions to business. Do you know where your critical vendors are getting their supplies? Are you aware of their business continuity plans to accommodate for those interruptions?
    • Poor vendor performance.
      • Organizations need to understand where vendors are acting in their operations and manage the impact of replacing that vendor and cutting their losses rather than continuing to throw good money away after a bad performance.
    • Vendor acquisitions.
      • A lot of acquisition is going on in the market today. Large companies are buying competitors, imposing new terms on customers, or removing competing products from the market. Understand your options if a vendor is acquired by a company with which you do not wish to be in a relationship.

    It is important to identify where potential risks to your operations may come from to manage and potentially eliminate them from impacting your organization.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Most organizations realize that their vendors could operationally affect them if an incident occurs. Still, they fail to follow the chain of events that might arise from those incidents to understand the impact fully.

    Prepare your vendor risk management for success

    Due diligence will enable successful outcomes.

    1. Obtain top-level buy-in; it is critical to success.
    2. Build enterprise risk management (ERM) through incremental improvement.
    3. Focus initial efforts on the “big wins” to prove the process works.
    4. Use existing resources.
    5. Build on any risk management activities that already exist in the organization.
    6. Socialize ERM throughout the organization to gain additional buy‑in.
    7. Normalize the process long term with ongoing updates and continuing education for the organization.

    How to assess third-party operational risk

    1. Review Organizational Operations

      Understand the organization’s operational risks to prepare for the “what if” game exercise.
    2. Identify and Understand Potential Operational Risks

      Play the “what if” game with the right people at the table.
    3. Create a Risk Profile Packet for Leadership

      Pull all the information together in a presentation document.
    4. Validate the Risks

      Work with leadership to ensure that the proposed risks are in line with their thoughts.
    5. Plan to Manage the Risks

      Lower the overall risk potential by putting mitigations in place.
    6. Communicate the Plan

      It is important not only to have a plan but also to socialize it in the organization for awareness.
    7. Enact the Plan

      Once the plan is finalized and socialized, put it in place with continued monitoring for success.

    Insight summary

    Operational risk impacts often come from unexpected places and have unforeseen impacts. Knowing where your vendors place in critical business processes and those vendors' business continuity plans concerning your organization should be a priority for those who manage the vendors.

    Insight 1

    Organizations fail to plan for vendor acquisitions appropriately.

    Vendors routinely get acquired in the IT space. Does your organization have appropriate safeguards from inadvertently entering a negative relationship? Do you have plans around replacing critical vendors purchased in such a manner?

    Insight 2

    Organizations often fail to understand how they factor into a vendor’s business continuity plan.

    If one of your critical vendors goes down, do you know how they intend to re-establish business? Do you know how you factor into their priorities?

    Insight 3

    Organizations need to have a comprehensive understanding of how their vendor-managed systems integrate with Operations.

    Do you understand where in the business processes vendor-supported systems lie? Do you have contingencies around disruptions that account for those pieces missing from the process?

    Identifying operational vendor risk

    Who should be included in the discussion

    • While it is true that executive-level leadership defines the strategy for an organization, it is vital for those making decisions to make informed decisions.
    • Getting input from operational experts at your organization will enhance your organization's long-term potential for success.
    • Involving those who not only directly manage vendors but also understand your business processes will aid in determining the forward path for relationships with your current vendors and identifying new emerging potential partners.

    See the blueprint Build an IT Risk Management Program

    Review your operational plans for new risks on a regular basis.

    Keep in mind Risk = Likelihood x Impact (R=L*I).

    Impact (I) tends to remain the same, while Likelihood (L) is becoming closer to 100% as threat actors become more prevalent

    Managing vendor operational risk impacts

    What can we realistically do about the risks?

    • Review vendors’ business continuity plans and disaster recovery testing.
      • Understand your priority in their plans.
    • Institute proper contract lifecycle management.
      • Make sure to follow corporate due diligence and risk assessment policies and procedures.
      • Failure to do so consistently can be a recipe for disaster.
    • Develop IT governance and change control.
    • Introduce continual risk assessment to monitor the relevant vendor markets.
      • Regularly review your operational plans for new risks and evolving likelihoods.
      • Risk = Likelihood x Impact (R=L*I).
        • Impact (I) tends to remain the same and be well understood, while Likelihood (L) may often be considered 100%.
    • Be adaptable and allow for innovations that arise from the current needs.
      • Capture lessons learned from prior incidents to improve over time and adjust your plans accordingly.

    Organizations need to review their organizational risk plans, considering the placement of vendors in their operations.

    Pandemics, extreme weather, and wars that affect global supply chains are current realities, not unlikely scenarios.

    Ongoing improvement

    Incorporating lessons learned

    • Over time, despite everyone’s best observations and plans, incidents will catch us off guard.
    • When it happens, follow your incident response plans and act accordingly.
    • An essential step is to document what worked and what did not – collectively known as the “lessons learned.”
    • Use the lessons learned document to devise, incorporate, and enact a better risk management process.

    Sometimes disasters occur despite our best plans to manage them.

    When this happens, it is important to document the lessons learned and improve our plans going forward.

    The "what if" game

    1-3 hours

    Vendor management professionals are in an excellent position to help senior leadership identify and pull together resources across the organization to determine potential risks. By playing the "what if" game and asking probing questions to draw out – or eliminate – possible adverse outcomes, everyone involved adds their insight into parts of the organization to gather a comprehensive picture of potential impacts.

    • Break into smaller groups (or if too small, continue as a single group).
    • Use the Operational Risk Impact Tool to prompt discussion on potential risks. Keep this discussion flowing organically to explore all potentials but manage the overall process to keep the discussion pertinent and on track.
    • Collect the outputs and ask the subject matter experts (SMEs) for management options for each one in order to present a comprehensive risk strategy. You will use this to educate senior leadership so that they can make an informed decision to accept or reject the solution.

    Download the Operational Risk Impact Tool

    Input

    • List of identified potential risk scenarios scored by likelihood and operational impact
    • List of potential management of the scenarios to reduce the risk

    Output

    • Comprehensive operational risk profile on the specific vendor solution

    Materials

    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • Operational Risk Impact Tool to help drive discussion

    Participants

    • Vendor Management – Coordinator
    • Organizational Leadership
    • Operations Experts (SMEs)
    • Legal/Compliance/Risk Manager

    High risk example from tool

    Sample Questions to Ask to Identify Impacts. Lists questions impact score, weight, question and comments or notes.

    Being overly reliant on a single talented individual can impose risk to your operations. Make sure you include resiliency in your skill sets for critical business practices.

    Impact score and level. Each score for impacts are unique to the organization.

    Low risk example from tool

    Sample Questions to Ask to Identify Impacts. Lists questions impact score, weight, question and comments or notes. Impact score and level. Each score for impacts are unique to the organization.

    Summary

    Seek to understand all aspects of your operations.

    • Organizations need to understand and map out where vendors are critical to their operations.
    • Those organizations that consistently follow their established risk assessment and due diligence processes will be better positioned to avoid disasters.
    • Bring the right people to the table to outline potential risks in the market and your organization.
    • Understand how your vendors prioritize your organization in their business continuity processes.
    • Incorporate “lessons learned” from prior incidents into your risk management process to build better plans for future issues.

    Organizations must evolve their operational risk assessments considering their vendor portfolio.

    Ongoing monitoring of the market and the vendors tied to company operations is imperative to avoiding disaster.

    Related Info-Tech Research

    Identify and Manage Financial Risk Impacts on Your Organization

    • Vendor management practices educate organizations on the different potential financial impacts that vendors may incur and suggest systems to help manage them.
    • Standardize your processes for identifying and monitoring vendor risks to manage financial impacts with our Financial Risk Impact Tool.

    Identify and Manage Reputational Risk Impacts on Your Organization

    • Vendor management practices educate organizations on the different potential risks to vendors in your market and suggest creative and alternative ways to avoid and help manage them.
    • Standardize your processes for identifying and monitoring vendor risks to manage potential impacts on your reputation and brand with our Reputational Risk Impact Tool.

    Identify and Manage Strategic Risk Impacts on Your Organization

    • Vendor management practices educate organizations on the different potential risks to vendors in your market and suggest creative and alternative ways to avoid and help manage them.
    • Standardize your processes for identifying and monitoring vendor risks to manage potential impacts on your strategic plan with our Strategic Risk Impact Tool.

    Bibliography

    “Weak Cybersecurity is taking a toll on Small Businesses.” Tripwire. August 7, 2022.

    SecureLink 2022 White Paper SL_Page_EA+PAM (rocketcdn.me)

    Member Poll March 2021 "Guide: Evolving Work Environments Impact of Covid-19 on Profile and Management of Third Parties.“ Shared Assessments. March 2021.

    “Operational Risk.” Wikipedia.

    Tonello, Matteo. “Strategic Risk Management: A Primer for Directors.” Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, August 23, 2012.

    Frigo, Mark L., and Richard J. Anderson. “Embracing Enterprise Risk Management: Practical Approaches for Getting Started.” COSO, 2011.

    Microsoft Dynamics 365: Understand the Transition to the Cloud

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}350|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 8.7/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $94,858 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 4 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Licensing
    • Parent Category Link: /licensing
    • Your on-premises Dynamics CRM or AX needs updating or replacing, and you’re not sure whether to upgrade or transition to the cloud with the new Microsoft Dynamics 365 platform. You’re also uncertain about what the cost might be or if there are savings to be had with a transition to the cloud for your enterprise resource planning system.
    • The new license model, Apps vs. Plans and Dual Use Rights in the cloud, includes confusing terminology and licensing rules that don’t seem to make sense. This makes it difficult to purchase proper licensing that aligns with your current on-premises setup and to maximize your choices in transition licenses.
    • There are different licensing programs for Dynamics 365 in the cloud. You need to decide on the most cost effective program for your company, for now and for the future.
    • Microsoft is constantly pressuring you to move to the cloud, but you don’t understand the why. You're uncertain if there's real value in such a strategic move right now, or if should you wait awhile.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Focus on what’s best for you. Do a thorough current state assessment of your hardware and software needs and consider what will be required in the near future (one to four years).
    • Educate yourself. You should have a good understanding of your options from staying on-premises vs. an interim hybrid model vs. a lift and shift to the cloud.
    • Consider the overall picture. There might not be hard cost savings to be realized in the near term, given the potential increase in licensing costs over a CapEx to OpEx savings.

    Impact and Result

    • Understanding the best time to transition, from a licensing perspective, could save you significant dollars over the next one to four years.
    • Planning and effectively mapping your current licenses to the new cloud user model will maximize your current investment into the cloud and fully leverage all available Microsoft incentives in the process.
    • Gaining the knowledge required to make the most informed transition decision, based on best timing, most appropriate licensing program, and maximized cost savings in the near term.
    • Engaging effectively with Microsoft and a competent Dynamics partner for deployment or licensing needs.

    Microsoft Dynamics 365: Understand the Transition to the Cloud Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should learn about Microsoft Dynamics 365 user-based cloud licensing, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Timing

    Review to confirm if you are eligible for Microsoft cloud transition discounts and what is your best time to move to the cloud.

    • Microsoft Dynamics 365: Understand the Transition to the Cloud – Phase 1: Timing
    • Microsoft License Agreement Summary Tool
    • Existing CRM-AX License Summary Worksheet

    2. Licensing

    Begin with a review to understand user-based cloud licensing, then move to mapping your existing licenses to the cloud users and plans.

    • Microsoft Dynamics 365: Understand the Transition to the Cloud – Phase 2: Licensing
    • Microsoft Dynamics 365 On-Premises License Transition Mapping Tool
    • Microsoft Dynamics 365 User License Assignment Tool
    • Microsoft Licensing Programs Brief Overview

    3. Cost review

    Use your cloud mapping activity as well your eligible discounts to estimate your cloud transition licensing costs.

    • Microsoft Dynamics 365: Understand the Transition to the Cloud – Phase 3: Cost Review
    • Microsoft Dynamics 365 Cost Estimator

    4. Analyze and decide

    Start by summarizing your choice license program, decide on the ideal time, then move on to total cost review.

    • Microsoft Dynamics 365: Understand the Transition to the Cloud – Phase 4: Analyze and Decide
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Microsoft Dynamics 365: Understand the Transition to the Cloud

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Understand What You Own and What You Can Transition to the Cloud

    The Purpose

    Understand what you own and what you can transition to the cloud.

    Learn which new cloud user licenses to transition.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    All your licenses in one summary.

    Eligible transition discounts.

    Mapping of on-premises to cloud users.

    Activities

    1.1 Validate your discount availability.

    1.2 Summarize agreements.

    1.3 Itemize your current license ownership.

    1.4 Review your timing options.

    1.5 Map your on-premises licenses to the cloud-based, user-based model.

    Outputs

    Current agreement summary

    On-premises to cloud user mapping summary

    Understanding of cloud app and plan features

    2 Transition License Cost Estimate and Additional Costs

    The Purpose

    Estimate cloud license costs and other associated expenses.

    Summarize and decide on the best timing, users, and program.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Good cost estimate of equivalent cloud user-based licenses.

    Understanding of when and how to move your on-premises licensing to the new Dynamics 365 cloud model.

    Activities

    2.1 Estimate cloud user license costs.

    2.2 Calculate additional costs related to license transitions.

    2.3 Review all activities.

    2.4 Summarize and analyze your decision.

    Outputs

    Cloud user licensing cost modeling

    Summary of total costs

    Validation of costs and transition choices

    An informed decision on your Dyn365 timing, licensing, and costs

    Your Company is an Economy: Why This is Your Secret Weapon for Resilience

    • Large vertical image:
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A

    IT specialists often instinctively focus on technical issues, such as server failures or network problems, because they are trained to address the broken parts. However, it's important to consider the context in which these occur. But what if the real problem isn't just the part but the entire system it operates in?

    I want you to take a step back and to stop thinking about your company as a collection of departments and IT systems. Start seeing it for what it truly is: a complex, living, breathing economic system. This isn't some academic analogy. It’s a powerful model that will change how you approach resilience.

    An economic system involves production, resource allocation, and distribution of goods and services, which parallels how a company operates internally. It includes the combination of various departments, the people doing things, the business units, and even the decision-making steps that make up the economic structure of your company. Once you see this, you can never unsee it.

    What is an economic system?

    Let’s quickly demystify this. Forget textbooks and complex theories for a moment. Think about a national economy. It does three basic things:

    1. Production: It makes things. Factories build cars, farms grow food, and programmers write software. This is the creation of value.

    2. Resource Allocation: This process decides who gets what to make those things. Who gets the steel for the cars? The land for the farms? The funding for the software developers? These are all decisions about how to use scarce resources. 

    3. Distribution: This process gets the finished products to the people who need them. Cars go to importers, then dealerships then the customers, food goes to grocery stores, and software gets deployed to servers and then used by clients (in the general sense).

    That's it. Production, allocation, distribution. Every economy, from a simple bartering tribe to the global financial market, operates on these principles. And so does your company.

    So, how is your company an economy?

    Your company doesn't just “do work.” It produces, allocates, and distributes services in its own internal market (and eventually sells outside, otherwise… trouble).

    The production is everywhere. The human resources department produces a “payroll service.” The sales department produces “revenue contracts.” And the IT department? It produces a vast array of services: “compute cycles,” “data storage,” “network connectivity,” and “application uptime.” These are the goods and services that every other part of the company consumes to do their jobs.

    Resource allocation is the lifeblood of your corporate economy. It's the annual budgeting process, the project prioritization meetings, and the daily decisions managers make about where to assign their people. In IT, you are equally part of the allocation process. Most people get to decide at least what they will give priority to that day. Perhaps via the daily scrum or stand-up meetings. Perhaps during the review process. As a manager, when you approve a request for a new high-powered virtual machine for one team, you are making an economic choice. You are allocating a scarce resource that another team can no longer use. As a developer, when you decide that task X is now a higher priority than task Y, you make an economic decision to allocate yourself to task X. It's important to understand that there is an opportunity cost to every decision, whether you label it that way or not. 

    And distribution? That's how these services get to their “consumers.” It’s the internal platforms, the APIs that connect applications, the service desk that fulfills requests, the operations teams that update data via forms into databases, and even the reporting dashboards that deliver information. These are the supply chains and logistics networks of your company’s economy. The consumers are your clients, of course, but also every department that uses a service provided by another department.

    The IT department plays a central role in the company's economy, akin to a central bank and infrastructure provider, by managing essential digital resources like compute, storage, and bandwidth. You control its supply and, through your decisions, influence its value. You also build and maintain the “roads” and “power grid”—the networks and platforms—that the entire corporate economy depends on to function.

    Why This Perspective Is Important for Resilience

    This is where I feel it gets fascinating. When you start seeing your company as an economic system, your understanding of resilience deepens dramatically. You move beyond simply fixing broken things and start thinking about stabilizing a complex, interconnected market.

    It helps you understand true systemic risk.

    When a core database goes down, an engineer sees a technical failure. An economist sees a supply chain collapse. That database isn't just a box with blinking lights; it's a critical supplier of a raw material, namely data. Every single business process, application, and team that creates, updates or consumes that data is now starved of a resource they need to produce their own services. The failure cascades not just through technical dependencies but through economic dependencies. Seeing it this way forces you to ask better questions: Who are the biggest “consumers” of this data supplier? What is the total economic impact of this outage, not just the technical impact? This changes the incident's priority and your response strategy.

    You move beyond simple redundancy.

    The traditional engineering approach to resilience is redundancy. If one server is important, have two. This is like a town having two power plants. It's a good start, but it's not true economic resilience. An economist would ask different questions. Can we diversify our suppliers? Can we re-route via another path? If our primary database provider fails, can we switch to a secondary one, even if it's slower or pricier for a short time? This is the principle of substitution. Can a business process continue to function in a degraded mode, producing a lower-quality “good” for a while instead of stopping completely? This is about economic adaptability, not just technical duplication.

    You could take this even further and move into the realm of business continuity. Can your process work when your primary resource (the database) is not available? How would you redesign your process to work with an alternative solution? This thinking is at the heart of modern operational resilience regulations worldwide. Authorities are no longer just asking if your backups work; they're asking if your firm can fulfill its economic function in the face of severe adversity. They demand a clear grasp of your entire supply chain and a testable exit plan for critical suppliers, including cloud providers.

    You see that this goes way beyond a failing-part view. It goes to the heart of the economic function of your company.

    Incident response becomes economic intervention.

    During a major incident, the incident commander is now no longer just a technical coordinator. You are the head of the “central bank” during a "market crash". Your job is to prevent a localized failure from causing a full-blown corporate recession. Think about your actions:

    • You allocate scarce capital (your top engineers' time) to the most critical problem. The economic cost is the non-delivery of any other product by those people.

    • You implement fiscal policy by prioritizing certain fixes over others to stimulate the quickest “economic” recovery.

    • You manage market confidence through clear, calm, and regular communication to stakeholders, preventing panic from spreading.

    Each decision is an economic intervention designed to restore stability to the system. (If that is not the job description of a central banker, then I eat my hat.)

    Side Note: I often see teams who are obsessed with their own service's uptime, their own local metrics. They proudly report “five nines” of availability, but they do not report on how their service is actually consumed or how critical it is to the company's overall economic output. They've optimized their own factory but don't disclose their output's need level to the company or that their occasional one-hour outage brings the entire company's main assembly line to a halt. Resilience is not about local optimization; it is about the stability of the entire economic system. A dashboard that lists teams in order of availability or whatever other metric is fine, but these numbers must be mapped against their economic relevance. Without the economic relevance weighting, you may be misallocating resources in areas that are not critical or sufficiently important.

    How to Start Thinking Like an Economist in Your Resilience Practice

    This isn't just a theoretical exercise. You can apply this model today to make your organization stronger and yourself more effective to any employer or client.

    First, map your economic flows. Go beyond standard architecture diagrams. Create maps that show how value and services are produced, distributed, and consumed across departments. Identify your most important “supply chains.” Ask business units what IT services are essential for their “production lines” and what the financial impact is when those services are unavailable. This gives you a heat map of economic risk.

    Second, identify your single points of economic failure. In every economy, there are institutions that are “too big to fail.” What are yours? Is it a single authentication service? A legacy mainframe? A specific team of two people who know how a critical system works? These are the areas where a failure will cause a systemic crisis. They require more than just technical redundancy; they need deep, thoughtful resilience planning, including succession plans for people and substitution options for technology.

    Finally, reframe your post-incident reviews. Stop just asking, “What broke and why?” Start asking, “Which economic activity was disrupted?” and “How did the disruption flow through the system?” This shifts the conversation from blaming a component or a team to understanding systemic weaknesses in your company's economy. The goal is not to find a guilty party but to identify where your internal market is fragile and how you can strengthen it with better “monetary policy” (resource allocation) or “infrastructure” (more robust platforms).

    The vicious cycle of a failing economy

    In another article, I mentioned that resilience is a mindset.
     Resilience mindset graphic 

    So what happens when this economic system becomes unstable?

    These issues are typically considered failures and they manifest as irritations, perceived slowness and bugs, all the way to (regular) failures of a process or whole system.

    If this broken economic system is allowed to remain unstable, people will adopt negative behaviors.

    When “the government” (IT) fails to deliver, business teams take matters into their hands and start shadow IT. They may even purchase their own subscriptions.

    In a stable economy, participants trust that resources will be available when needed, but in a broken system, that trust is gone and leads to the hoarding of assets. This may be visible in the requested need for time or even budget allocation. And that leads into protectionism where teams build walls around their data and systems.

    When failures are common, the focus shifts from resolving the systemic problems to assigning blame for the specific symptom. This is akin to the breakdown of trade relations. The applications team blames the infrastructure team for slow servers. The infrastructure team blames the network team for latency. The network team blames the applications team for inefficient code. And around we go.

    Taking it just that little step further: If people live in a failing state long enough, they lose hope. This is learned helplessness. Your most valuable “citizens”—your engineers and business users—become disengaged. They stop reporting bugs because they assume they will never be fixed. They stop suggesting process improvements because they believe their voice doesn't matter.

    And lastly: In a functional system, there are clear processes for requesting services. In your broken economy, these official channels are considered worthless. The only way to get anything done is to generate a crisis. Escalation becomes the primary currency. People learn to bypass the ticketing system and send direct messages to senior leaders because they perceive that's the only way to get a response.

    How to Break the Cycle: Start Small

    To break this cycle, you need to start small and use mechanisms that turn the negative effects of problems into positive effects, like seeing opportunities.

    • Opportunities to correct irritations
    • Opportunities to enhance processes
    • Opportunities to perhaps redesign a service

    Proposing a grand vision will get you polite nods and zero action. I recommend you pick one irritation and fix it. Repeat multiple times until staff starts to perceive a change. Don't try to move the mountain. Remove the first obstacle and make your way up from there. This can be solving an issue, reducing an uncertainty, or actually spotting a way forward. 

    It will go easier as you continue this. Accept that on day one, your credibility is zero. It doesn’t matter whether you're a new manager or a seasoned expert. Trust is earned on the factory floor. Fix one small, nagging irritation for one person. Then another. This is how you build the political and social capital needed to tackle the mountain. It takes time.

    But what will happen next is crucial. There will be a reduction of the negative behaviors. And when you work it efficiently with enough time, you will eliminate those behaviors. And yes, there will be many ifs and buts, and each of the broken elements of a larger chain may require their own solutions. But it is this act of seeing the bigger picture through the constituent parts that will allow you to assign priorities and move closer to the solution in a structural way.
    Seeing step by step results feeds positivism and higher stability. Which in turn again feeds more positivism. 

     

    When you view your company through the lens of an economic system, it elevates the practice of resilience from a purely technical discipline to a value function. It gives you a language to communicate impact and risk to leadership in terms they understand: production, supply, and cost.

    It forces you to see the interconnectedness of everything you do and to appreciate that the failure of a single, seemingly minor component can have large, cascading effects across the entire organization. By thinking like an economist, you stop being just a firefighter, putting out isolated blazes. You become the architect of a more stable, more robust, and ultimately more resilient economy.

    You become the architect of a more stable, more robust, and ultimately more resilient economy. Now, go manage it.

    Always ready for a chat.

    Gain Control of Cloud Integration Strategies Before they Float Away

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}362|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Enterprise Integration
    • Parent Category Link: /enterprise-integration
    • IT is typically backlogged with tasks while the business waits to implement key solutions to remain competitive. In this competitive space, Cloud solutions offer attractive benefits to business stakeholders especially around agility and cost.
    • Moving to the Cloud involves more than outsourcing a component of the technology stack. Roles, processes, and authentication technologies need to be redefined to fit a distributed stack where parts of the IT solution space reside on-premise while the rest are in the Cloud.
    • Cloud integration means accepting loss of control in product development. A Cloud vendor will address the needs of most constituents and any high degree of customization which counteracts their business model. This makes integration a complex initiative involving two separate parties trying to align.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Cloud integration is a fundamental commitment to change within the organization as it deeply impacts roles, processes, and technologies.
    • Be prepared to lose some degree of control of SLA management. IT will have to manage multiple Cloud SLAs and deliver a lowest common approach to the business. This may mean lowering the SLA standards previously set with on-premise solutions.
    • Cloud integration isn’t just about the technology. It is a dedication to establish solid relationships with the Cloud vendor. Understanding where the cloud solution is moving and what issues are being addressed are critical to creating an organizational road map for the future.

    Impact and Result

    • Develop a Cloud integration strategy by proactively understanding the impact of Cloud integration efforts to the organization.
    • Realize that Cloud integration will be an ongoing process of collaboration with the business, and that the initial implementation does not constitute an end.
    • Implement an integrated support structure that includes on-premise and cloud stacks.

    Gain Control of Cloud Integration Strategies Before they Float Away Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Understand the impacts of Cloud computing on Data, Application, Access, and Service Level Agreement integration

    Assess your current level of Cloud adoption and integration, focusing on solutions that are emerging in the market and the applicability to your IT environment.

    • Storyboard: Gain Control of Cloud Integration Strategies Before they Float Away
    • Cloud Integration Checklist
    • None
    [infographic]

    Effective IT Communications

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}429|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Lead
    • Parent Category Link: /lead

    IT communications are often considered ineffective. This is demonstrated by:

    • A lack of inclusion or time to present in board meetings.
    • Confusion around IT priorities and how they align to organizational objectives.
    • Segregating IT from the rest of the organization.
    • The inability to secure the necessary funding for IT-led initiatives.
    • IT employees not feeling supported or engaged.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • No one is born a good communicator. Every IT employee needs to spend the time and effort to grow their communication skills; with constant change and worsening IT crises, IT cannot afford to communicate poorly anymore.
    • The skills needed to communicate effectively as a front=line employee or CIO are the same. It is important to begin the development of these skills from the beginning of one's career.
    • Time is a non-renewable resource. Any communication needs to be considered valuable and engaging by the audience or they will be unforgiving.

    Impact and Result

    Communications is a responsibility of all members of IT. This is demonstrated through:

    • Engaging in two-way communications that are continuous and evolving.
    • Establishing a communications strategy – and following the plan.
    • Increasing the skills of all IT employees when it comes to communications.
    • Identifying audiences and their preferred means of communication.

    Effective IT Communications Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Effective IT Communications Capstone Deck – A resource center to ensure you never start communications from a blank page again.

    This capstone blueprint highlights the components, best practices, and importance of good communication for all IT employees.

    • Effective IT Communications Storyboard

    2. IT Townhall Template – A ready-to-use template to help you engage with IT employees and ensure consistent access to information.

    IT town halls must deliver value to employees, or they will withdraw and miss key messages. To engage employees, use well-crafted communications in an event that includes crowd-sourced contents, peer involvement, recognition, significant Q&A time allotment, organizational discussions, and goal alignment.

    • IT Townhall Template

    3. IT Year in Review Template – A ready-to-use template to help communicate IT successes and future objectives.

    This template provides a framework to build your own IT Year In Review presentation. An IT Year In Review presentation typically covers the major accomplishments, challenges, and initiatives of an organization's information technology (IT) department over the past year.

    • IT Year in Review Template

    Infographic

    Further reading

    Effective IT Communications

    Empower IT employees to communicate well with any stakeholder across the organization.

    Analyst perspective

    There has never been an expectation for IT to communicate well.

    Brittany Lutes

    Brittany Lutes
    Research Director
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Diana MacPherson

    Diana MacPherson
    Senior Research Analyst
    Info-Tech Research Group

    IT rarely engages in proper communications. We speak at, inform, or tell our audience what we believe to be important. But true communications seldom take place.

    Communications only occur when channels are created to ensure the continuous opportunity to obtain two-way feedback. It is a skill that is developed over time, with no individual having an innate ability to be better at communications. Each person in IT needs to work toward developing their personal communications style. The problem is we rarely invest in development or training related to communications. Information and technology fields spend time and money developing hard skills within IT, not soft ones.

    The benefits associated with communications are immense: higher business satisfaction, funding for IT initiatives, increased employee engagement, better IT to business alignment, and the general ability to form ongoing partnerships with stakeholders. So, for IT departments looking to obtain these benefits through true communications, develop the necessary skills.

    Executive summary

    Your Challenge Common Obstacles Info-Tech’s Approach
    IT communications are often considered ineffective. This is demonstrated by:
    • A lack of inclusion or time to present in board meetings.
    • Confusion around IT priorities and how they align to organizational objectives.
    • Segregating IT from the rest of the organization.
    • An inability to secure the necessary funding for IT-led initiatives.
    • IT employees not feeling supported or engaged.
    Frequently, these barriers have prevented IT communications from being effective:
    • Using technical jargon when a universal language is needed.
    • Speaking at organization stakeholders rather than engaging through dialogue.
    • Understanding the needs of the audience.
    Overall, IT has not been expected to engage in good communications or taken a proactive approach to communicate effectively.
    Communications is a responsibility of all members of IT. This is demonstrated through:
    • Engaging in two-way communications that are continuous and evolving.
    • Establishing a communications strategy – and following the plan.
    • Increasing the skills of all IT employees when it comes to communications.
    • Identifying audiences and their preferred means of communication.

    Info-Tech Insight
    No one is born a good communicator. Every IT employee needs to spend the time and effort to grow their communication skills as constant change and worsening IT crises mean that IT cannot afford to communicate poorly anymore.

    Your challenge

    Overall satisfaction with IT is correlated to satisfaction with IT communications

    Chart showing satisfaction with it and communications

    The bottom line? For every 10% increase in communications there 8.6% increase in overall IT satisfaction. Therefore, when IT communicates with the organization, stakeholders are more likely to be satisfied with IT overall.

    Info-Tech Diagnostic Programs, N=330 organizations

    IT struggles to communicate effectively with the organization:

    • CIOs are given minimal time to present to the board or executive leaders about IT’s value and alignment to business goals.
    • IT initiatives are considered complicated and confusing.
    • The frequency and impact of IT crises are under planned for, making communications more difficult during a major incident.
    • IT managers do not have the skills to communicate effectively with their team.
    • IT employees do not have the skills to communicate effectively with one another and end users.

    Common obstacles

    IT is prevented from communicating effectively due to these barriers:

    • Difficulty assessing the needs of the audience to inform the language and means of communication that should be used.
    • Using technical jargon rather than translating the communication into commonly understood terms.
    • Not receiving the training required to develop communication skills across IT employees.
    • Frequently speak at organization stakeholders rather than engaging through dialogue.
    • Beginning many communications from a blank page, especially crisis communications.
    • Difficulty presenting complex concepts in a short time to an audience in a digestible and concise manner without diluting the point.

    Effective IT communications are rare:

    53% of CXOs believe poor communication between business and IT is a barrier to innovation.
    Source: Info-Tech CEO-CIO Alignment Survey, 2022

    69% of those in management positions don’t feel comfortable even communicating with their staff.”
    Source: TeamStage, 2022

    Info-Tech’s approach

    Effective communications is not a broadcast but a dialogue between communicator and audience in a continuous feedback loop.

    Continuous loop of dialogue

    The Info-Tech difference:

    1. Always treat every communication as a dialogue, enabling the receiver of the message to raise questions, concerns, or ideas.
    2. Different audiences will require different communications. Be sure to cater the communication to the needs of the receiver(s).
    3. Never assume the communication was effective. Create measures and adjust the communications to get the desired outcome.

    Common IT communications

    And the less common but still important communications

    Communicating Up to Board or Executives

    • Board Presentations
    • Executive Leadership Committee Meetings
    • Technology Updates
    • Budget Updates
    • Risk Updates
    • Year in Review

    Communicating Across the Organization

    • Townhalls – external to IT
    • Year in Review
    • Crisis Email
    • Intranet Communication
    • Customer/Constituent Requests for Information
    • Product Launches
    • Email
    • Watercooler Chat

    Communicating Within IT

    • Townhalls – internal to IT
    • Employee 1:1s
    • Team Meetings
    • Project Updates
    • Project Collaboration Sessions
    • Year in Review
    • All-Hands Meeting
    • Employee Interview
    • Onboarding Documentation
    • Vendor Negotiation Meetings
    • Vendor Product Meetings
    • Email
    • Watercooler Chat

    Insight Summary

    Overarching insight
    IT cannot afford to communicate poorly given the overwhelming impact and frequency of change related to technology. Learn to communicate well or get out of the way of someone who can.

    Insight 1: The skills needed to communicate effectively as a frontline employee or a CIO are the same. It’s important to begin the development of these skills from the beginning of one’s career.
    Insight 2: Time is a non-renewable resource. Any communication needs to be considered valuable and engaging by the audience or they will be unforgiving.
    Insight 3: Don’t make data your star. It is a supporting character. People can argue about the collection methods or interpretation of the data, but they cannot argue the story you share.
    Insight 4: Measure if the communication is being received and resulting in the desired outcome. If not, modify what and how the message is being expressed.
    Insight 5: Messages are also non-verbal. Practice using your voice and body to set the right tone and impact your audience.

    Communication principles

    Follow these principles to support all IT communications.

    Two-Way

    Incorporate feedback loops into your communication efforts. Providing stakeholders with the opportunity to voice their opinions and ideas will help gain their commitment and buy-in.

    Timely

    Frequent communications mitigate rumors and the spread of misinformation. Provide warning before the implementation of any changes whenever possible. Communicate as soon as possible after decisions have been made.

    Consistent

    Make sure the messaging is consistent across departments, mediums, and presenters. Provide managers with key phrases to support the consistency of messages.

    Open & Honest

    Transparency is a critical component of communication. Always tell employees that you will share information as soon as you can. This may not be as soon as you receive the information but as soon as sharing it is acceptable.

    Authentic

    Write messages in a way that embodies the personality of the organization. Don’t spin information; position it within the wider organizational context.

    Targeted

    Use your target audience profiles to determine which audiences need to consume which messages and what mediums should be employed.

    Importance of IT being a good communicator

    Don’t pay the price for poor communication.

    IT needs to communicate well because:

    • IT risk mitigation and technology initiative funding are dependent on critical stakeholders comprehending the risk impact and initiative benefit in easy-to-understand terms.
    • IT employees need clear and direct information to feel empowered and accountable to do their jobs well.
    • End users who have a good experience engaging in communications with IT employees have an overall increase in satisfaction with IT.
    • Continuously demonstrating IT’s value to the organization comes when those initiatives are clearly aligned to overall objectives.
    • Communication prevents assumptions and further miscommunication from happening among IT employees who are usually impacted and fear change the most.

    “Poor communication results in employee misunderstanding and errors that cost approximately $37 billion.”
    – Intranet Connections, 2019

    Effective communication enables organizational strategy and facilitates a two-way exchange

    Effective communication facilitates a two-way exchange

    What makes internal communications effective?

    To be effective, internal communications must be strategic. They should directly support organizational objectives, reinforce key messages to make sure they drive action, and facilitate two-way dialogue, not just one-way messaging.

    Measure the value of the communication

    Communication effectiveness can be measured through a variety of metrics:

    • Increase in Productivity
    • “When employees are offered better communication technology and skills, productivity can increase by up to 30%” (Expert Market, 2022).
    • Increase in Understanding Decision Rationale
    • Employees who report understanding the rationale behind the business decisions made by the executive leadership team (ELT) are 3.6x more likely to be engaged, compared to those who were not (McLean & Company Engagement Survey Database, 2022; N=133,167 responses, 187 organizations).
    • Increase in Revenue
    • Collaboration amongst C-suite executives led to a 27% increase in revenue compared to low collaborating C-suites (IBM, 2021).
    • Increase in End-User Satisfaction
    • 80.9% of end users are satisfied with IT’s ability to communicate with them regarding the information they need to perform their job (Info-Tech’s End-User Satisfaction Survey Database, N=20,617 end users from 126 organizations).

    Methods to determine effectiveness:

    • CIO Business Vision Survey
    • Engagement surveys
    • Focus groups
    • Suggestion boxes
    • Team meetings
    • Random sampling
    • Informal feedback
    • Direct feedback
    • Audience body language
    • Repeating the message back

    How to navigate the research center

    This research center is intended to ensure that IT never starts their communications from a blank page again:

    Tools to help IT be better communicators

    “‘Effectiveness’ can mean different things, and effectiveness for your project is going to look different than it would for any other project.”
    – Gale McCreary in WikiHow, 2022

    Audience: Organizational leadership

    Speaking with Board and executive leaders about strategy, risk, and value

    Keep in mind:

    1 2 3
    Priorities Differ Words Matter The Power of Three
    What’s important to you as CIO is very different from what is important to a board or executive leadership team or even the individual members of these groups. Share only what is important or relevant to the stakeholder(s). Simplify the message into common language whenever possible. A good test is to ensure that someone without any technical background could understand the message. Keep every slide to three points with no more than three words. You are the one to translate this information into a worth-while story to share.

    “Today’s CIOs have a story to tell. They must change the old narrative and describe the art of the (newly) possible. A great leader rises to the occasion and shares a vision that inspires the entire organization.”
    – Dan Roberts, CIO, 2019

    Communications for board presentations

    Secure funding and demonstrate IT as a value add to business objectives.

    DEFINING INSIGHT

    Stop presenting what is important to you as the CIO and present to the board what is important to them.

    Why does IT need to communicate with the board?

    • To get their buy-in and funding for critical IT initiatives.
    • To ensure that IT risks are understood and receive the funding necessary to mitigate.
    • To change the narrative of IT as a service provider to a business enabler.

    FRAMEWORK

    Framework for board presentations

    CHECKLIST

    Do’s & Don’ts of Communicating Board Presentations:

    Do: Ensure you know all the members of the board and their strengths/areas of focus.

    Do: Ensure the IT objectives and initiatives align to the business objectives.

    Do: Avoid using any technical jargon.

    Do: Limit the amount of data you are using to present information. If it can’t stand alone, it isn’t a strong enough data point.

    Do: Avoid providing IT service metrics or other operational statistics.

    Do: Demonstrate how the organization’s revenue is impacted by IT activities.

    Do: Tell a story that is compelling and excited.

    OUTCOME

    Organization Alignment

    • Approved organization objectives and IT objectives are aligned and supporting one another.

    Stakeholder Buy-In

    • Board members all understand what the future state of IT will look like – and are excited for it!

    Awareness on Technology Trends

    • It is the responsibility of the CIO to ensure the board is aware of critical technology trends that can impact the future of the organization/industry.

    Risks

    • Risks are understood, the impact they could have on the organization is clear, and the necessary controls required to mitigate the risk are funded.

    Communications for business updates

    Continuously build strong relationships with all members of business leadership.

    DEFINING INSIGHT

    Business leaders care about themselves and their goals – present ideas and initiatives that lean into this self-interest.

    Why does IT need to communicate business updates?

    • The key element here is to highlight how IT is impacting the organization’s overall ability to meet goals and targets.
    • Ensure all executive leaders know about and understand IT’s upcoming initiatives – and how they will be involved.

    FRAMEWORK

    Framework for business updates

    CHECKLIST

    Do’s & Don’ts of Communicating Business Updates:

    Do: Ensure IT is given sufficient time to present with the rest of the business leaders.

    Do: Ensure the goals of IT are clear and can be depicted visually.

    Do: Tie every IT goal to the objectives of different business leaders.

    Do: Avoid using any technical jargon.

    Do: Reinforce the positive benefits business leaders can expect.

    Do: Avoid providing IT service metrics or other operational statistics.

    Do: Demonstrate how IT is driving the digital transformation of the organization.

    OUTCOME

    Better Reputation

    • Get other business leaders to see IT as a value add to any initiative, making IT an enabler not an order taker.

    Executive Buy-In

    • Executives are concerned about their own budgets; they want to embrace all the innovation but within reason and minimal impact to their own finances.

    Digital Transformation

    • Indicate and commit to how IT can help the different leaders deliver on their digital transformation activities.

    Relationship Building

    • Establish trust with the different leaders so they want to engage with you on a regular basis.

    Audience: Organization wide

    Speaking with all members of the organization about the future of technology – and unexpected crises.

    1 2 3
    Competing to Be Heard Measure Impact Enhance the IT Brand
    IT messages are often competing with a variety of other communications simultaneously taking place in the organization. Avoid the information-overload paradox by communicating necessary, timely, and relevant information. Don’t underestimate the benefit of qualitative feedback that comes from talking to people within the organization. Ensure they read/heard and absorbed the communication. IT might be a business enabler, but if it is never communicated as such to the organization, it will only be seen as a support function. Use purposeful communications to change the IT narrative.

    Less than 50% of internal communications lean on a proper framework to support their communication activities.
    – Philip Nunn, iabc, 2020

    Communications for strategic IT initiatives

    Communicate IT’s strategic objectives with all business stakeholders and users.

    DEFINING INSIGHT

    IT leaders struggle to communicate how the IT strategy is aligned to the overall business objectives using a common language understood by all.

    Why does IT need to communicate its strategic objectives?

    • To ensure a clear and consistent view of IT strategic objectives can be understood by all stakeholders within the organization.
    • To demonstrate that IT strategic objectives are aligned with the overall mission and vision of the organization.

    FRAMEWORK

    Framework for IT strategic initiatives

    CHECKLIST

    Do’s & Don’ts of Communicating IT Strategic Objectives:

    Do: Ensure all IT leaders are aware of and understand the objectives in the IT strategy.

    Do: Ensure there is a visual representation of IT’s goals.

    Do: Ensure the IT objectives and initiatives align to the business objectives.

    Do: Avoid using any technical jargon.

    Do: Provide metrics if they are relevant, timely, and immediately understandable.

    Do: Avoid providing IT service metrics or other operational statistics.

    Do: Demonstrate how the future of the organization will benefit from IT initiatives.

    OUTCOME

    Organization Alignment

    • All employees recognize the IT strategy as being aligned, even embedded, into the overall organization strategy.

    Stakeholder Buy-In

    • Business and IT stakeholders alike understand what the future state of IT will look like – and are excited for it!

    Role Clarity

    • Employees within IT are clear on how their day-to-day activities impact the overall objectives of the organization.

    Demonstrate Growth

    • Focus on where IT is going to be maturing in the coming one to two years and how this will benefit all employees.

    Communications for crisis management

    Minimize the fear and chaos with transparent communications.

    DEFINING INSIGHT

    A crisis communication should fit onto a sticky note. If it’s not clear, concise, and reassuring, it won’t be effectively understood by the audience.

    Why does IT need to communicate when a crisis occurs?

    • To ensure all members of the organization have an understanding of what the crisis is, how impactful that crisis is, and when they can expect more information.
    • “Half of US companies don’t have a crisis communication plan” (CIO, 2017).

    FRAMEWORK

    Framework for crisis management

    CHECKLIST

    Do’s & Don’ts of Communicating During a Crisis:

    Do: Provide timely and regular updates about the crisis to all stakeholders.

    Do: Involve the Board or ELT immediately for transparency.

    Do: Avoid providing too much information in a crisis communication.

    Do: Have crisis communication statements ready to be shared at any time for possible or common IT crises.

    Do: Highlight that employee safety and wellbeing is top priority.

    Do: Work with members of the public relations team to prepare any external communications that might be required.

    OUTCOME

    Ready to Act

    • Holding statements for possible crises will eliminate the time and effort required when the crisis does occur.

    Reduce Fears

    • Prevent employees from spreading concerns and not feeling included in the crisis.

    Maintain Trust

    • Ensure Board and ELT members trust IT to respond in an appropriate manner to any crisis or major incident.

    Eliminate Negative Reactions

    • Any crisis communication should be clear and concise enough when done via email.

    Audience: IT employees

    IT employees need to receive and obtain regular transparent communications to better deliver on their expectations.

    Keep in mind:

    1 2 3
    Training for All Listening Is Critical Reinforce Collaboration
    From the service desk technician to CIO, every person within IT needs to have a basic ability to communicate. Invest in the training necessary to develop this skill set. It seems simple, but as humans we do an innately poor job at listening to others. It’s important you hear employee concerns, feedback, and recommendations, enabling the two-way aspect of communication. IT employees will reflect the types of communications they see. If IT leaders and managers cannot collaborate together, then teams will also struggle, leading to productivity and quality losses.

    “IT professionals who […] enroll in communications training have a chance to both upgrade their professional capabilities and set themselves apart in a crowded field of technology specialists.”
    – Mark Schlesinger, Forbes, 2021

    Communications for IT activities and tactics

    Get IT employees aligned and clear on their daily objectives.

    DEFINING INSIGHT

    Depending on IT goals, the structure might need to change to support better communication among IT employees.

    Why does IT need to communicate IT activities?

    • To ensure all members of the project team are aligned with their tasks and responsibilities related to the project.
    • To be able to identify, track, and mitigate any problems that are preventing the successful delivery of the project.

    FRAMEWORK

    Framework for IT activities & tactics

    CHECKLIST

    Do’s & Don’ts of Communicating IT Activities:

    Do: Provide metrics that define how success of the project will be measured.

    Do: Demonstrate how each project aligns to the overarching objectives of the organization.

    Do: Avoid having large meetings that include stakeholders from two or more projects.

    Do: Consistently create a safe space for employees to communicate risks related to the project(s).

    Do: Ensure the right tools are being leveraged for in-office, hybrid, and virtual environments to support project collaboration.

    Do: Leverage a project management software to reduce unnecessary communications.

    OUTCOME

    Stakeholder Adoption

    • Create a standard communication template so stakeholders can easily find and apply communications.

    Resource Allocation

    • Understand what the various asks of IT are so employees can be adequately assigned to tasks.

    Meet Responsibly

    • Project status meetings are rarely valuable or insightful. Use meetings for collaboration, troubleshooting, and knowledge sharing.

    Encourage Engagement

    • Recognize employees and their work against critical milestones, especially for projects that have a long timeline.

    Communications for everyday IT

    Engage employees and drive results with clear and consistent communications.

    DEFINING INSIGHT

    Employees are looking for empathy to be demonstrated by those they are interacting with, from their peers to managers. Yet, we rarely provide it.

    Why does IT need to communicate on regularly with itself?

    • Regular communication ensures employees are valued, empowered, and clear about their expectations.
    • 97% of employees believe that their ability to perform their tasks efficiently is impacted by communication (Expert Market, 2022).

    FRAMEWORK

    Framework for everyday IT

    CHECKLIST

    Do’s & Don’ts of Communicating within IT:

    Do: Have responses for likely questions prepared and ready to go.

    Do: Ensure that all leaders are sharing the same messages with their teams.

    Do: Avoid providing irrelevant or confusing information.

    Do: Speak with your team on a regular basis.

    Do: Reinforce the messages of the organization every chance possible.

    Do: Ensure employees feel empowered to do their jobs effectively.

    Do: Engage employees in dialogue. The worst employee experience is when they are only spoken at, not engaged with.

    OUTCOME

    Increased Collaboration

    • Operating in a vacuum or silo is no longer an option. Enable employees to successfully collaborate and deliver holistic results.

    Role Clarity

    • Clear expectations and responsibilities eliminate confusion and blame game. Engage employees and create a positive work culture with role clarity.

    Prevent Rumors

    • Inconsistent communication often leads to information sharing and employees spreading an (in)accurate narrative.

    Organizational Insight

    • Employees trust the organization’s direction because they are aware of the different activities taking place and provided with a rationale about decisions.

    Case Study

    Amazon

    INDUSTRY
    E-Commerce

    SOURCE
    Harvard Business Review

    Jeff Bezos has definitely taken on unorthodox approaches to business and leadership, but one that many might not know about is his approach to communication. Some of the key elements that he focused on in the early 2000s when Amazon was becoming a multi-billion-dollar empire included:

    • Banning PowerPoint for all members of the leadership team. They had to learn to communicate without the crutch of the most commonly used presentation tool.
    • Leveraging memos that included specific action steps and clear nouns
    • Reducing all communication to an eighth-grade reading level, including pitches for new products (e.g. Kindle).

    Results

    While he was creating the Amazon empire, 85% of Jeff Bezos’ communication was written in a way that an eighth grader could read. Communicating in a way that was easy to understand and encouraging his leadership team to do so as well is one of the many reasons this business has grown to an estimated value of over $800B.

    “If you cannot simplify a message and communicate it compellingly, believe me, you cannot get the masses to follow you.”
    – Indra Nooyi, in Harvard Business Review, 2022

    Communication competency expectations

    Communication is a business skill; not a technical skill.

    Demonstrated Communication Behavior
    Level 1: Follow Has sufficient communication skills for effective dialogue with others.
    Level 2: Assist Has sufficient communication skills for effective dialogue with customers, suppliers, and partners.
    Level 3: Apply Demonstrates effective communication skills.
    Level 4: Enable Communicates fluently, orally, and in writing and can present complex information to both technical and non-technical audiences.
    Level 5: Ensure, Advise Communicates effectively both formally and informally.
    Level 6: Initiate, Influence Communicates effectively at all levels to both technical and non-technical audiences.
    Level 7: Set Strategy, Inspire, Mobilize Understands, explains, and presents complex ideas to audiences at all levels in a persuasive and convincing manner.

    Source: Skills Framework for the Information Age, 2021

    Key KPIs for communication with any stakeholder

    Measuring communication is hard; use these to determine effectiveness.

    Goal Key Performance Indicator (KPI) Related Resource
    Obtain board buy-in for IT strategic initiatives X% of IT initiatives that were approved to be funded. Number of times technical initiatives were asked to be explained further. Using our Board Presentation Review service
    Establish stronger relationships with executive leaders X% of business leadership satisfied with the statement “IT communicates with your group effectively.” Using the CIO Business Vision Diagnostic
    Organizationally, people know what products and services IT provides X% of end users who are satisfied with communications around changing services or applications. Using the End-User Satisfaction Survey
    Organizational reach and understanding of the crisis. Number of follow-up tickets or requests related to the crisis after the initial crisis communication was sent. Using templates and tools for crisis communications
    Project stakeholders receive sufficient communication throughout the initiative. X% overall satisfaction with the quality of the project communications. Using the PPM Customer Satisfaction Diagnostic
    Employee feedback is provided, heard, and acted on X% of satisfaction employees have with managers or IT leadership to act on employee feedback. Using the Employee Engagement Diagnostic Program

    Standard workshop communication activities

    Introduction
    Communications overview.

    Plan
    Plan your communications using a strategic tool.

    Compose
    Create your own message.

    Deliver
    Practice delivering your own message.

    Contact your account representative for more information. workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8889

    Research contributors and experts

    Anuja Agrawal, National Communications Director, PwC

    Anuja Agrawal
    National Communications Director
    PwC

    Anuja is an accomplished global communications professional, with extensive experience in the insurance, banking, financial, and professional services industries in Asia, the US, and Canada. She is currently the National Communications Director at PwC Canada. Her prior work experience includes communication leadership roles at Deutsche Bank, GE, Aviva, and Veritas. Anuja works closely with senior business leaders and key stakeholders to deliver measurable results and effective change and culture building programs. Anuja has experience in both internal and external communications, including strategic leadership communication, employee engagement, PR and media management, digital and social media, and M&A/change and crisis management. Anuja believes in leveraging digital tools and technology-enabled solutions, combined with in-person engagement, to help improve the quality of dialogue and increase interactive communication within the organization to help build an inclusive culture of belonging.

    Nastaran Bisheban, Chief Technology Officer, KFC Canada

    Nastaran Bisheban
    Chief Technology Officer
    KFC Canada

    A passionate technologist, and seasoned transformational leader. A software engineer and computer scientist by education, a certified Project Manager that holds an MBA in Leadership with Honors and Distinction from University of Liverpool. A public speaker on various disciplines of technology and data strategy with a Harvard Business School executive leadership program training to round it all. Challenges status quo and conventional practices; is an advocate for taking calculated risk and following the principle of continuous improvement. With multiple computer software and project management publications she is a strategic mentor and board member on various non-profit organizations. Nastaran sees the world as a better place only when everyone has a seat at the table and is an active advocate for diversity and inclusion.

    Heidi Davidson, Co-Founder & CEO, Galvanize Worldwide and Galvanize On Demand

    Heidi Davidson
    Co-Founder & CEO
    Galvanize Worldwide and Galvanize On Demand

    Dr. Heidi Davidson is the co-founder and CEO of Galvanize Worldwide, the largest distributed network of marketing and communications experts in the world. She also is the co-founder and CEO of Galvanize On Demand, a tech platform that matches marketing and communications freelancers with client projects. Now with 167 active experts, the Galvanize team delivers startup advisory work, outsourced marketing, training, and crisis communications to organizations of all sizes. Before Galvanize, Heidi spent four years as part of the turnaround team at BlackBerry as the Chief Communications Officer and SVP of Corporate Marketing, where she helped the company move from a device manufacturer to a security software provider.

    Eli Gladstone, Co-Founder, Speaker Labs

    Eli Gladstone
    Co-Founder
    Speaker Labs

    Eli is a co-founder of Speaker Labs. He has spent over six years helping countless individuals overcome their public speaking fears and communicate with clarity and confidence. When he’s not coaching others on how to build and deliver the perfect presentation, you’ll probably find him reading some weird books, teaching his kids how to ski or play tennis, or trying to develop a good-enough jumpshot to avoid being a liability on the basketball court.

    Francisco Mahfuz, Keynote Speaker & Storytelling Coach

    Francisco Mahfuz
    Keynote Speaker & Storytelling Coach

    Francisco Mahfuz has been telling stories in front of audiences for a decade and even became a National Champion of public speaking. Today, Francisco is a keynote speaker and storytelling coach and offers communication training to individuals and international organizations and has worked with organizations like Pepsi, HP, the United Nations, Santander, and Cornell University. He’s the author of Bare: A Guide to Brutally Honest Public Speaking and the host of The Storypowers Podcast, and he’s been part of the IESE MBA communications course since 2020. He’s received a BA in English Literature from Birkbeck University in London.

    Sarah Shortreed, EVP & CTO, ATCO Ltd.

    Sarah Shortreed
    EVP & CTO
    ATCO Ltd.

    Sarah Shortreed is ATCO’s Executive Vice President and Chief Technology Officer. Her responsibilities include leading ATCO’s Information Technology (IT) function as it continues to drive agility and collaboration throughout ATCO’s global businesses and expanding and enhancing its enterprise IT strategy, including establishing ATCO’s technology roadmap for the future. Ms. Shortreed’s skill and expertise are drawn from her more than 30-year career that spans many industries and includes executive roles in business consulting, complex multi-stakeholder programs, operations, sales, customer relationship management, and product management. She was recently the Chief Information Officer at Bruce Power and has previously worked at BlackBerry, IBM, and Union Gas. She sits on the Board of Governors for the University of Western Ontario and is the current Chair of the Chief Information Officer (CIO) Committee at the Conference Board of Canada.

    Eric Silverberg, Co-Founder, Speaker Labs

    Eric Silverberg
    Co-Founder
    Speaker Labs

    Eric is a co-founder of Speaker Labs and has helped thousands of people build their public speaking confidence and become more dynamic and engaging communicators. When he’s not running workshops to help people grow in their careers, there’s a good chance you’ll find him with his wife and dog, drinking Diet Coke, and rewatching iconic episodes of the reality TV show Survivor! He’s such a die-hard fan, that you’ll probably see him playing the game one day.

    Stephanie Stewart, Communications Officer & DR Coordinator, Info Security Services Simon Fraser University

    Stephanie Stewart
    Communications Officer & DR Coordinator
    Info Security Services Simon Fraser University

    Steve Strout, President, Miovision Technologies

    Steve Strout
    President
    Miovision Technologies

    Mr. Strout is a recognized and experienced technology leader with extensive experience in delivering value. He has successfully led business and technology transformations by leveraging many dozens of complex global SFDC, Oracle, and SAP projects. He is especially adept at leading what some call “Project Rescues” – saving people’s careers where projects have gone awry; always driving “on-time and on-budget.” Mr. Strout is the current President of Miovision Technologies and the former CEO and board member of the Americas’ SAP Users” Group (ASUG). His wealth of practical knowledge comes from 30 years of extensive experience in many CxO and executive roles at some prestigious organizations such as Vonage, Sabre, BlackBerry, Shred-it, The Thomson Corporation (now Thomson Reuters), and Morris Communications. He has served on boards including Customer Advisory Boards of Apple, AgriSource Data, Dell, Edgewise, EMC, LogiSense, Socrates.ai, Spiro Carbon Group, and Unifi.

    Info-Tech Research Group Contributors:

    Sanchia Benedict, Research Lead
    Antony Chan Executive Counsellor
    Janice Clatterbuck, Executive Counsellor
    Ahmed Jowar, Research Specialist
    Dave Kish, Practice Lead
    Nick Kozlo, Senior Research Analyst
    Heather Leier Murray, Senior Research Analyst
    Amanda Mathieson, Research Director
    Carlene McCubbin, Practice Lead
    Joe Meier, Executive Counsellor
    Andy Neill, AVP Research
    Thomas Randall, Research Director

    Plus an additional two contributors who wish to remain anonymous.

    Related Info-Tech Research

    Boardroom Presentation Review

    • You will come away with a clear, concise, and compelling board presentation that IT leaders can feel confident presenting in front of their board of directors.
    • Add improvements to your current board presentation in terms of visual appeal and logical flow to ensure it resonates with your board of directors.
    • Leverage a best-of-breed presentation template.

    Build a Better Manager

    • Management skills training is needed, but organizations are struggling to provide training that makes a long-term difference in the skills managers actually use in their day to day.
    • Many training programs are ineffective because they offer the wrong content, deliver it in a way that is not memorable, and are not aligned with the IT department’s business objectives.

    Crisis Communication Guides

    During a crisis it is important to communicate to employees through messages that convey calm and are transparent and tailored to your audience. Use the Crisis Communication Guides to:

    • Draft a communication strategy.
    • Tailor messages to your audience.
    • Draft employee crisis communications.
    Use this guide to equip leadership to communicate in times of crisis.

    Bibliography

    “Communication in the Workplace Statistics: Importance and Effectiveness in 2022.” TeamStage, 2022.

    Gallo, Carmine. “How Great Leaders Communicate.” Harvard Business Review, 23 November 2022

    Guthrie, Georgina. “Why Good Internal Communications Matter Now More than Ever.” Nulab, 15 December 2021.

    Lambden, Duncan. “The Importance of Effective Workplace Communication – Statistics for 2022.” Expert Market, 13 June 2022.

    “Mapping SFIA Levels of Responsibilities to Behavioural Factors.” Skills Framework for the Information Age, 2021.

    McCreary, Gale. “How to Measure the Effectiveness of Communication: 14 Steps.” WikiHow, 31 March 2023.

    Nowak, Marcin. “Top 7 Communication Problems in the Workplace.” MIT Enterprise Forum CEE, 2021.

    Nunn, Philip. “Messaging That Works: A Unique Framework to Maximize Communication Success.” iabc, 26 October 2020.

    Picincu, Andra. “How to Measure Effective Communications.” Small Business Chron. 12 January 2021.

    Price. David A. “Pixar Story Rules.” Stories From the Frontiers of Knowledge, 2011.

    Roberts, Dan. “How CIOs Become Visionary Communicators.” CIO, 2019.

    Schlesinger, Mark. “Why building effective communication skill in IT is incredibly important.” Forbes, 2021.

    Stanten, Andrew. “Planning for the Worst: Crisis Communications 101.” CIO, 25 May 2017.

    State of the American Workplace Report. Gallup, 6 February 2020.

    “The CIO Revolution.” IBM, 2021.

    “The State of High Performing Teams in Tech 2022.” Hypercontex, 2022.

    Walters, Katlin. “Top 5 Ways to Measure Internal Communication.” Intranet Connections, 30 May 2019.

    Tell Your Story With Data Visualization

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}364|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Business Intelligence Strategy
    • Parent Category Link: /business-intelligence-strategy

    Analysts do not feel empowered to challenge requirements to deliver a better outcome. This alongside underlying data quality issues prevents the creation of accurate and helpful information. Graphic representations do not provide meaningful and actionable insights.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    As organizations strive to become more data-driven, good storytelling with data visualization supports growing corporate data literacy and helps analysts in providing insights that improves organization's decision-making and value-driving processes, which ultimately boosts business performance.

    Impact and Result

    Follow a step-by-step guide to address the business bias of tacet experience over data facts and increase audience's understanding and acceptance toward data solutions.

    Save the lost hours and remove the challenges of reports and dashboards being disregarded due to ineffective usage.

    Gain insights from data-driven recommendations and have decision support to make informed decisions.

    Tell Your Story With Data Visualization Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Tell Your Story With Data Visualization Deck – Solve challenging business problems more effectively and improve communication with audiences by demonstrating significant insights through data storytelling with impactful visuals.

    Here is our step-by-step process of getting value out of effective storytelling with data visualization:

  • Step 1: Frame the business problem and the outcomes required.
  • Step 2: Explore the potential drivers and formulate hypotheses to test.
  • Step 3: Construct a meaningful narrative which the data supports.
    • Tell Your Story With Data Visualization Storyboard

    2. Storytelling Whiteboard Canvas Template – Plan out storytelling using Info-Tech’s whiteboard canvas template.

    This storytelling whiteboard canvas is a template that will help you create your visualization story narrative by:

  • Identifying the problem space.
  • Finding logical relationships and data identification.
  • Reviewing analysis and initial insights.
  • Building the story and logical conclusion.
    • Storytelling Whiteboard Canvas Template
    [infographic]

    Further reading

    Tell Your Story With Data Visualization

    Build trust with your stakeholders.

    Analyst Perspective

    Build trust with your stakeholders.

    Data visualization refers to graphical representations of data which help an audience understand. Without good storytelling, however, these representations can distract an audience with enormous amounts of data or even lead them to incorrect conclusions.

    Good storytelling with data visualization involves identifying the business problem, exploring potential drivers, formulating a hypothesis, and creating meaningful narratives and powerful visuals that resonate with all audiences and ultimately lead to clear actionable insights.

    Follow Info-Tech's step-by-step approach to address the business bias of tacit experience over data facts, improve analysts' effectiveness and support better decision making.

    Ibrahim Abdel-Kader, Research Analyst

    Ibrahim Abdel-Kader
    Research Analyst,
    Data, Analytics, and Enterprise Architecture

    Nikitha Patel, Research Specialist

    Nikitha Patel
    Research Specialist,
    Data, Analytics, and Enterprise Architecture

    Ruyi Sun, Research Specialist

    Ruyi Sun
    Research Specialist,
    Data, Analytics, and Enterprise Architecture

    Our understanding of the problem

    This research is designed for

    • Business analysts, data analysts, or their equivalent who (in either a centralized or federated operating model) look to solve challenging business problems more effectively and improve communication with audiences by demonstrating significant insights through visual data storytelling.

    This research will also assist

    • A CIO or business unit (BU) leader looking to improve reporting and analytics, reduce time to information, and embrace decision making.

    This research will help you

    • Identify the business problem and root causes that you are looking to address for key stakeholders.
    • Improve business decision making through effective data storytelling.
    • Focus on insight generation rather than report production.
    • Apply design thinking principles to support the collection of different perspectives.

    This research will help them

    • Understand the report quickly and efficiently, regardless of their data literacy level.
    • Grasp the current situation of data within the organization.

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge Common Obstacles Info-Tech's Approach
    As analysts, you may experience some critical challenges when presenting a data story.
    • The graphical representation does not provide meaningful or actionable insights.
    • Difficulty selecting the right visual tools or technologies to create visual impact.
    • Lack of empowerment, where analysts don't feel like they can challenge requirements.
    • Data quality issues that prevent the creation of accurate and helpful information.
    Some common roadblocks may prevent you from addressing these challenges.
    • Lack of skills and context to identify the root cause or the insight that adds the most value.
    • Lack of proper design or over-visualization of data will mislead/confuse the audience.
    • Business audience bias, leading them to ignore reliable insights presented.
    • Lack of the right access to obtain data could hinder the process.
    • Understand and dissect the business problem through Info-Tech's guidance on root cause analysis and design thinking process.
    • Explore each potential hypothesis and construct your story's narratives.
    • Manage data visualization using evolving tools and create visual impact.
    • Inform business owners how to proceed and collect feedback to achieve continuous improvement.

    Info-Tech Insight
    As organizations strive to become more data-driven, good storytelling with data visualization supports growing corporate data literacy and helps analysts provide insights that improve organizational decision-making and value-driving processes, which ultimately boosts business performance.

    Glossary

    • Data: Facts or figures, especially those stored in a computer, that can be used for calculating, reasoning, or planning. When data is processed, organized, structured, or presented in a given context to make it useful, it is called information. Data leaders are accountable for certain data domains and sets.
    • Data storytelling: The ability to create a narrative powered by data and analytics that supports the hypothesis and intent of the story. Narrators of the story should deliver a significant view of the message in a way easily understood by the target audience. Data visualization can be used as a tactic to enhance storytelling.
    • Data visualization: The ability to visually represent a complete story to the target audience powered by data & analytics, using data storytelling as an enabling mechanism to convey narratives. Typically, there are two types of visuals used as part of data visualization: explanatory/informative visuals (the entire story or specific aspects delivered to the audience) and exploratory visuals (the collected data used to clarify what questions must be answered).
    • Data literacy: The ability to read, work with, analyze, and argue with data. Easy access to data is essential to exercising these skills. All organizational employees involved with data-driven decisions should learn to think critically about the data they use for analytics and how they assess and interpret the results of their work.
    • Data quality: A measure of the condition of data based on factors such as accuracy, completeness, consistency, reliability, and being up-to-date. This is about how well-suited a data set is to serve its intended purpose, therefore business users and stakeholders set the standards for what is good enough. The governance function along with IT ensures that data quality measures are applied, and corrective actions taken.
    • Analytics/Business intelligence (BI): A technology-driven process for analyzing data and delivering actionable information that helps executives, managers, and workers make informed business decisions. As part of the BI process, organizations collect data from internal IT systems and external sources, prepare it for analysis, run queries against the data, and create data visualizations.
      Note: In some frameworks, analytics and BI refer to different types of analyses (i.e. analytics predict future outcomes, BI describes what is or has been).

    Getting value out of effective storytelling with data visualization

    Data storytelling is gaining wide recognition as a tool for supporting businesses in driving data insights and making better strategic decisions.

    92% of respondents agreed that data storytelling is an effective way of communicating or delivering data and analytics results.

    87% of respondents agreed that if insights were presented in a simpler/clearer manner, their organization's leadership team would make more data-driven decisions.

    93% of respondents agreed that decisions made based on successful data storytelling could potentially help increase revenue.

    Source: Exasol, 2021

    Despite organizations recognizing the value of data storytelling, issues remain which cannot be remedied solely with better technology.

    61% Top challenges of conveying important insights through dashboards are lack of context (61%), over-communication (54%), and inability to customize contents for intended audiences (46%).

    49% of respondents feel their organizations lack storytelling skills, regardless of whether employees are data literate.

    Source: Exasol, 2021

    Info-Tech Insight
    Storytelling is a key component of data literacy. Although enterprises are increasingly investing in data analytics software, only 21% of employees are confident with their data literacy skills. (Accenture, 2020)

    Prerequisite Checklist

    Before applying Info-Tech's storytelling methodology, you should have addressed the following criteria:

    • Select the right data visualization tools.
    • Have the necessary training in statistical analysis and data visualization technology.
    • Have competent levels of data literacy.
    • Good quality data founded on data governance and data architecture best practices.

    To get a complete view of the field you want to explore, please refer to the following Info-Tech resources:

    Select and Implement a Reporting and Analytics Solution

    Build a Data Architecture Roadmap

    Establish Data Governance

    Build Your Data Quality Program

    Foster Data-Driven Culture With Data Literacy

    Info-Tech's Storytelling With Data Visualization Framework

    Data Visualization Framework

    Info-Tech Insight
    As organizations strive to become more data-driven, good storytelling with data visualization supports growing corporate data literacy and helps analysts provide insights that improve organizational decision-making and value-driving processes, which ultimately boosts business performance.

    Research Benefits

    Member Benefits Business Benefits
    • Reduce time spent on getting your audience in the room and promote business involvement with the project.
    • Eliminate ineffectively used reports and dashboards being disregarded for lack of storytelling skills, resulting in real-time savings and monetary impact.
    • Example: A $50k reporting project has a 49% risk of the company being unable to communicate effective data stories (Exasol, 2021). Therefore, a $50k project has an approx. 50% chance of being wasted. Using Info-Tech's methodology, members can remove the risk, saving $25k and the time required to produce each report.
    • Address the common business bias of tacit experience over data-supported facts and increase audience understanding and acceptance of data-driven solutions.
    • Clear articulation of business context and problem.
    • High-level improvement objectives and return on investment (ROI).
    • Gain insights from data-driven recommendations to assist with making informed decisions.

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit Guided Implementation Workshop Consulting
    "Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful." "Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track." "We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place." "Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project."

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks are used throughout all four options.

    Risk management company

    Expert risk management consultancy firm

    Based on experience
    Implementable advice
    human-based and people-oriented

    Engage Tymans Group, expert risk management and consultancy company, to advise you on mitigating, preventing, and monitoring IT and information security risks within your business. We offer our extensive experience as a risk consulting company to provide your business with a custom roadmap and practical solutions to any risk management problems you may encounter.

    Security and risk management

    Our security and risk services

    Security strategy

    Security Strategy

    Embed security thinking through aligning your security strategy to business goals and values

    Read more

    Disaster Recovery Planning

    Disaster Recovery Planning

    Create a disaster recovey plan that is right for your company

    Read more

    Risk Management

    Risk Management

    Build your right-sized IT Risk Management Program

    Read more

    Check out all our services

    Setting up risk management within your company with our expert help

    Risk is unavoidable when doing business, but that does not mean you should just accept it and move on. Every company should try to manage and mitigate risk as much as possible, be it risks regarding data security or general corporate security. As such, it would be wise to engage an expert risk management and consultancy company, like Tymans Group. Our risk management consulting firm offers business practical solutions for setting up risk management programs and IT risk monitoring protocols as well as solutions for handling IT incidents. Thanks to our experience as a risk management consulting firm, you enjoy practical and proven solutions based on a people-oriented approach.

    Benefit from our expert advice on risk management

    If you engage our risk management consultancy company you get access to various guides and documents to help you set up risk management protocols within you company. Additionally, you can book a one-hour online talk with our risk management consulting firm’s CEO Gert Taeymans to discuss any problems you may be facing or request an on-site appointment in which our experts analyze your problems. The talk can discuss any topic, from IT risk control to external audits and even corporate security consultancy. If you have any questions about our risk management and consulting services for your company, we are happy to answer them. Just contact our risk management consulting firm through the online form and we will get in touch with as soon as possible.

    Register to read more …

    M&A Runbook for Infrastructure and Operations

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}60|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: After each Info-Tech experience, we ask our members to quantify the real-time savings, monetary impact, and project improvements our research helped them achieve.
    • member rating average days saved: Read what our members are saying
    • Parent Category Name: Strategy and Organizational Design
    • Parent Category Link: /strategy-and-organizational-design
    • I&O is often the last to be informed of an impending M&A deal.
    • The business doesn’t understand the necessary requirements or timeline for integration.
    • It’s hard to prioritize when you’re buried under a mountain of work.
    • Documentation may be lacking or nonexistent, and members of the target organization may be uncooperative.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Manage expectations. The business often expects integration in days or weeks, not months or years. You need to set them straight.
    • Open your checkbook and prepare to hire. Integration will require a temporary increase in resources.
    • Tackle organizational and cultural change. People are harder to integrate than technology. Culture change is the hardest part, and the integration plan should address it.

    Impact and Result

    • Tailor your approach based on the business objectives of the merger or acquisition.
    • Separate the must-haves from the nice-to-haves.
    • Ensure adequate personnel and budget.
    • Plan for the integration into normal operations.

    M&A Runbook for Infrastructure and Operations Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out how to partner with the business to conquer the challenges in your next merger or acquisition.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Establish goals

    Partner with the business to determine goals and establish high-level scope.

    • M&A Runbook for Infrastructure and Operations – Phase 1: Establish Goals
    • I&O M&A Project Napkin

    2. Conduct discovery

    Find out what the target organization’s I&O looks like.

    • M&A Runbook for Infrastructure and Operations – Phase 2: Conduct Discovery
    • I&O M&A Discovery Letter Template
    • I&O M&A Discovery Template
    • I&O M&A Workbook
    • I&O M&A Risk Assessment Tool

    3. Plan short-term integration

    Build a plan to achieve a day 1 MVP.

    • M&A Runbook for Infrastructure and Operations – Phase 3: Plan Short-Term Integration
    • I&O M&A Short-Term Integration Capacity Assessment Tool

    4. Map long-term integration

    Chart a roadmap for long-term integration.

    • M&A Runbook for Infrastructure and Operations – Phase 4: Map Long-Term Integration
    • I&O M&A Long-Term Integration Portfolio Planning Tool
    [infographic]

    Workshop: M&A Runbook for Infrastructure and Operations

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 High-Level Scope

    The Purpose

    Establish goals and conduct discovery.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Alignment with business goals

    Documentation of target organization’s current state

    Activities

    0.1 Consult with stakeholders.

    0.2 Establish M&A business goals.

    0.3 Conduct target discovery.

    0.4 Document own environment.

    0.5 Clarify goals.

    Outputs

    Stakeholder communication plan

    M&A business goals

    I&O M&A Discovery Template

    Current state of organization

    2 Target Assessment

    The Purpose

    Assess risk and value of target organization.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Accurate scope of I&O integration

    Risk mitigation plans

    Value realization strategies

    Activities

    1.1 Scope I&O M&A project.

    1.2 Assess risks.

    1.3 Assess value.

    Outputs

    I&O M&A Project Napkin

    Risk assessment

    Value assessment

    3 Day 1 Integration Project Plan

    The Purpose

    Establish day 1 integration project plan.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Smoother day 1 integration

    Activities

    2.1 Determine Day 1 minimum viable operating model post M&A.

    2.2 Identify gaps.

    2.3 Build day 1 project plan.

    2.4 Estimate required resources.

    Outputs

    Day 1 project plan

    4 Long-Term Project Plan

    The Purpose

    Draw long-term integration roadmap.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Improved alignment with M&A goals

    Greater realization of the deal’s value

    Activities

    3.1 Set long-term future state goals.

    3.2 Create a long-term project plan.

    3.3 Consult with business stakeholders on the long-term plan.

    Outputs

    Long-term integration project plan

    5 Change Management and Continual Improvement

    The Purpose

    Prepare for organization and culture change.

    Refine M&A I&O integration process.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Smoother change management

    Improved M&A integration process

    Activities

    4.1 Complete a change management plan.

    4.2 Conduct a process post-mortem.

    Outputs

    Change management plan

    Process improvements action items

    Take Control of Cloud Costs on AWS

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}425|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.3/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $62,500 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 26 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Cloud Strategy
    • Parent Category Link: /cloud-strategy
    • Traditional IT budgeting and procurement processes don't work for public cloud services.
    • The self-service nature of the cloud means that often the people provisioning cloud resources aren't accountable for the cost of those resources.
    • Without centralized control or oversight, organizations can quickly end up with massive AWS bills that exceed their IT salary cost.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Most engineers care more about speed of feature delivery and reliability of the system than they do about cost.
    • Often there are no consequences for over architecting or overspending on AWS.
    • Many organizations lack sufficient visibility into their AWS spend, making it impossible to establish accountability and controls.

    Impact and Result

    • Define roles and responsibilities.
    • Establish visibility.
    • Develop processes, procedures, and policies.

    Take Control of Cloud Costs on AWS Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should take control of cloud costs, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Build cost accountability framework

    Assess your current state, define your cost allocation model, and define roles and responsibilities.

    • Cloud Cost Management Worksheet
    • Cloud Cost Management Capability Assessment
    • Cloud Cost Management Policy
    • Cloud Cost Glossary of Terms

    2. Establish visibility

    Define dashboards and reports, and document account structure and tagging requirements.

    • Service Cost Cheat Sheet

    3. Define processes and procedures

    Establish governance for tagging and cost control, define processes for right-sizing, and define processes for purchasing commitment discounts.

    • Right-Sizing Workflow (Visio)
    • Right-Sizing Workflow (PDF)
    • Commitment Purchasing Workflow (Visio)
    • Commitment Purchasing Workflow (PDF)

    4. Build implementation plan

    Document process interactions, establish program KPIs, and build implementation roadmap and communication plan.

    • Cloud Cost Management Task List

    Infographic

    Workshop: Take Control of Cloud Costs on AWS

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Build Cost Accountability Framework

    The Purpose

    Establish clear lines of accountability and document roles and responsibilities to effectively manage cloud costs.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Chargeback/showback model to provide clear accountability for costs.

    Understanding of key areas to focus on to improve cloud cost management capabilities.

    Activities

    1.1 Assess current state

    1.2 Determine cloud cost model

    1.3 Define roles and responsibilities

    Outputs

    Cloud cost management capability assessment

    Cloud cost model

    Roles and responsibilities

    2 Establish Visibility

    The Purpose

    Establish visibility into cloud costs and drivers of those costs.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Better understanding of what is driving costs and how to keep them in check.

    Activities

    2.1 Develop architectural patterns

    2.2 Define dashboards and reports

    2.3 Define account structure

    2.4 Document tagging requirements

    Outputs

    Architectural patterns; service cost cheat sheet

    Dashboards and reports

    Account structure

    Tagging scheme

    3 Define Processes and Procedures

    The Purpose

    Develop processes, procedures, and policies to control cloud costs.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Improved capability of reducing costs.

    Documented processes and procedures for continuous improvement.

    Activities

    3.1 Establish governance for tagging

    3.2 Establish governance for costs

    3.3 Define right-sizing process

    3.4 Define purchasing process

    3.5 Define notification and alerts

    Outputs

    Tagging policy

    Cost control policy

    Right-sizing process

    Commitment purchasing process

    Notifications and Alerts

    4 Build Implementation Plan

    The Purpose

    Document next steps to implement and improve cloud cost management program.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Concrete roadmap to stand up and/or improve the cloud cost management program.

    Activities

    4.1 Document process interaction changes

    4.2 Define cloud cost program KPIs

    4.3 Build implementation roadmap

    4.4 Build communication plan

    Outputs

    Changes to process interactions

    Cloud cost program KPIs

    Implementation roadmap

    Communication plan

    Incident Management for Small Enterprise

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}482|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 10.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $6,531 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 3 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Incident & Problem Management
    • Parent Category Link: /incident-and-problem-management
    • Technical debt and disparate systems are big constraints for most small enterprise (SE) organizations. What may have worked years ago is no longer fit for purpose or the business is growing faster than the current tools in place can handle.
    • Super specialization of knowledge is also a common factor in smaller teams caused by complex architectures. While helpful, if that knowledge isn’t documented it can walk out the door with the resource and the rest of the team is left scrambling.
    • Lessons learned may be gathered for critical incidents but often are not propagated, which impacts the ability to solve recurring incidents.
    • Over time, repeated incidents can have a negative impact on the customer’s perception that the service desk is a credible and essential service to the business.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Go beyond the blind adoption of best-practice frameworks. No simple formula exists for improving incident management maturity. Identify the challenges in your incident lifecycle and draw on best-practice frameworks pragmatically to build a structured response to those challenges.
    • Track, analyze, and review results of incident response regularly. Without a comprehensive understanding of incident trends and patterns you can be susceptible to recurring incidents that increase in damage over time. Make the case for problem management, and successfully reduce the volume of unplanned work by scheduling it into regular IT activity.
    • Recurring incidents will happen; use runbooks for a consistent response each time. Save your organization response time and confusion by developing your own specific incident use cases. Incident response should follow a standard process, but each incident will have its own escalation process or call tree that identifies key participants.

    Impact and Result

    • Effective and efficient management of incidents involves a formal process of identifying, classifying, categorizing, responding, resolving, and closing of each incident. The key for smaller organizations, where technology or resources is a constraint, is to make the best practices usable for your unique environment.
    • Develop a plan that aligns with your organizational needs, and adapt best practices into light, sustainable processes, with the goal to improve time to resolve, cost to serve, and ultimately, end-user satisfaction.
    • Successful implementation of incident management will elevate the maturity of the service desk to a controlled state, preparing you for becoming proactive with problem management.

    Incident Management for Small Enterprise Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should implement incident management, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Identify and log incidents

    This phase will provide an overview of the incident lifecycle and an activity on how to classify the various types of incidents in your environment.

    • Service Desk Standard Operating Procedure
    • Incident Management Workflow Library (Visio)
    • Incident Management Workflow Library (PDF)

    2. Prioritize and define SLAs

    This phase will help you develop a categorization scheme for incident handling that ensures success and keeps it simple. It will also help you identify the most important runbooks necessary to create first.

    • Service Desk Ticket Categorization Schemes
    • IT Incident Runbook Prioritization Tool
    • IT Incident Management Runbook Blank Template

    3. Respond, recover, and close incidents

    This phase will help you identify how to use a knowledgebase to resolve incidents quicker. Identify what needs to be answered during a post-incident review and identify the criteria needed to invoke problem management.

    • Knowledgebase Article Template
    • Root-Cause Analysis Template
    • Post-Incident Review Questions Tracking Tool
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Incident Management for Small Enterprise

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Assess the Current State

    The Purpose

    Assess the current state of the incident management lifecycle within the organization.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Understand the incident lifecycle and how to classify them in your environment.

    Identify the roles and responsibilities of the incident response team.

    Document the incident workflows to identify areas of opportunities.

    Activities

    1.1 Outline your incident lifecycle challenges.

    1.2 Identify and classify incidents.

    1.3 Identify roles and responsibilities for incident handling.

    1.4 Design normal and critical incident workflows for target state.

    Outputs

    List of incident challenges for each phase of the incident lifecycle

    Incident classification scheme mapped to resolution team

    RACI chart

    Incident Workflow Library

    2 Define the Target State

    The Purpose

    Design or improve upon current incident and ticket categorization schemes, priority, and impact.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    List of the most important runbooks necessary to create first and a usable template to go forward with

    Activities

    2.1 Improve incident categorization scheme.

    2.2 Prioritize and define SLAs.

    2.3 Understand the purpose of runbooks and prioritize development.

    2.4 Develop a runbook template.

    Outputs

    Revised ticket categorization scheme

    Prioritization matrix based on impact and urgency

    IT Incident Runbook Prioritization Tool

    Top priority incident runbook

    3 Bridge the Gap

    The Purpose

    Respond, recover, and close incidents with root-cause analysis, knowledgebase, and incident runbooks.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    This module will help you to identify how to use a knowledgebase to resolve quicker.

    Identify what needs to be answered during a post-incident review.

    Identify criteria to invoke problem management.

    Activities

    3.1 Build a targeted knowledgebase.

    3.2 Build a post-incident review process.

    3.3 Identify metrics to track success.

    3.4 Build an incident matching process.

    Outputs

    Working knowledgebase template

    Root-cause analysis template and post-incident review checklist

    List of metrics

    Develop criteria for problem management

    2021 Q3 Research Highlights

    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: The Briefs
    • Parent Category Link: /the-briefs
    Our research team is a prolific bunch! Every quarter we produce lots of research to help you get the most value out of your organization. This PDF contains a selection of our most compelling research from the third quarter of 2021.

    Effectively Manage CxO Relations

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}384|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Manage Business Relationships
    • Parent Category Link: /manage-business-relationships

    With the exponential pace of technological change, an organization's success will depend largely on how well CIOs can evolve from technology evangelists to strategic business partners. This will require CIOs to effectively broker relationships to improve IT's effectiveness and create business value. A confidential journal can help you stay committed to fostering productive relationships while building trust to expand your sphere of influence.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    Highly effective executives have in common the ability to successfully balance three things: time, personal capabilities, and relationships. Whether you are a new CIO or an experienced leader, the relentless demands on your time and unpredictable shifts in the organization’s strategy require a personal game plan to deliver business value. Rather than managing stakeholders one IT project at a time, you need an action plan that is tailored for unique work styles.

    Impact and Result

    A personal relationship journal will help you:

    • Understand the context in which key stakeholders operate.
    • Identify the best communication approach to engage with different workstyles.
    • Stay committed to fostering relationships through difficult periods.

    Effectively Manage CxO Relations Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Effectively Manage CxO Relations Storyboard – A guide to creating a personal action plan to help effectively manage relationships across key stakeholders.

    Use this research to create a personal relationship journal in four steps:

    • Effectively Manage CxO Relations Storyboard

    2. Personal Relationship Management Journal Template – An exemplar to help you build your personal relationship journal.

    Use this exemplar to build a journal that is readily accessible, flexible, and easy to maintain.

    • Personal Relationship Management Journal Template

    Infographic

    Further reading

    Effectively Manage CxO Relations

    Make relationship management a daily habit with a personalized action plan.

    Analyst Perspective

    "Technology does not run an enterprise, relationships do." – Patricia Fripp

    As technology becomes increasingly important, an organization's success depends on the evolution of the modern CIO from a technology evangelist to a strategic business leader. The modern CIO will need to leverage their expansive partnerships to demonstrate the value of technology to the business while safeguarding their time and effort on activities that support their strategic priorities. CIOs struggling to transition risk obsolescence with the emergence of new C-suite roles like the Digital Transformation Officer, Chief Digital Officer, Chief Data Officer, and so on.

    CIOs will need to flex new social skills to accommodate diverse styles of work and better predict dynamic situations. This means expanding beyond their comfort level to acquire new social skills. Having a clear understanding of one's own work style (preferences, natural tendencies, motivations, and blind spots) is critical to identify effective communication and engagement tactics.

    Building trust is an art. Striking a balance between fulfilling your own goals and supporting others will require a carefully curated approach to navigate the myriad of personalities and work styles. A personal relationship journal will help you stay committed through these peaks and troughs to foster productive partnerships and expand your sphere of influence over the long term.

    Photo of Joanne Lee
    Joanne Lee
    Principal, Research Director, CIO Advisory
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    In today's unpredictable markets and rapid pace of technological disruptions, CIOs need to create business value by effectively brokering relationships to improve IT's performance. Challenges they face:

    • Operate in silos to run the IT factory.
    • Lack insights into their stakeholders and the context in which they operate.
    • Competing priorities and limited time to spend on fostering relationships.
    • Relationship management programs are narrowly focused on associated change management in IT project delivery.

    Common Obstacles

    Limited span of influence.

    Mistaking formal roles in organizations for influence.

    Understanding what key individuals want and, more importantly, what they don't want.

    Lack of situational awareness to adapt communication styles to individual preferences and context.

    Leveraging different work styles to create a tangible action plan.

    Perceiving relationships as "one and done."

    Info-Tech's Approach

    A personal relationship journal will help you stay committed to fostering productive relationships while building trust to expand your sphere of influence.

    • Identify your key stakeholders.
    • Understand the context in which they operate to define a profile of their mandate, priorities, commitments, and situation.
    • Choose the most effective engagement and communication strategies for different work styles.
    • Create an action plan to monitor and measure your progress.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Highly effective executives have in common the ability to balance three things: time, personal capabilities, and relationships. Whether you are a new CIO or an experienced leader, the relentless demand on your time and unpredictable shifts in the organization's strategy will require a personal game plan to deliver business value. This will require more than managing stakeholders one IT project at a time: It requires an action plan that fosters relationships over the long term.

    Key Concepts

    Stakeholder Management
    A common term used in project management to describe the successful delivery of any project, program, or activity that is associated with organizational change management. The goal of stakeholder management is intricately tied to the goals of the project or activity with a finite end. Not the focus of this advisory research.

    Relationship Management
    A broad term used to describe the relationship between two parties (individuals and/or stakeholder groups) that exists to create connection, inclusion, and influence. The goals are typically associated with the individual's personal objectives and the nature of the interaction is seen as ongoing and long-term.

    Continuum of Commitment
    Info-Tech's framework that illustrates the different levels of commitment in a relationship. It spans from active resistance to those who are committed to actively supporting your personal priorities and objectives. This can be used to baseline where you are today and where you want the relationship to be in the future.

    Work Style
    A reference to an individual's natural tendencies and expectations that manifest itself in their communication, motivations, and leadership skills. This is not a behavior assessment nor a commentary on different personalities but observable behaviors that can indicate different ways people communicate, interact, and lead.

    Glossary
    CDxO: Chief Digital Officer
    CDO: Chief Data Officer
    CxO: C-Suite Executives

    The C-suite is getting crowded, and CIOs need to foster relationships to remain relevant

    The span of influence and authority for CIOs is diminishing with the emergence of Chief Digital Officers and Chief Data Officers.

    63% of CDxOs report directly to the CEO ("Rise of the Chief Digital Officer," CIO.com)

    44% of organizations with a dedicated CDxO in place have a clear digital strategy versus 22% of those without a CDxO (KPMG/Harvey Nash CIO Survey)

    The "good news": CIOs tend to have a longer tenure than CDxOs.

    A diagram that shows the average tenure of C-Suites in years.
    Source: "Age and Tenure of C-Suites," Korn Ferry

    The "bad news": The c-suite is getting overcrowded with other roles like Chief Data Officer.

    A diagram that shows the number of CDOs hired from 2017 to 2021.
    Source: "Chief Data Officer Study," PwC, 2022

    An image of 7 lies technology executives tell ourselves.

    Info-Tech Insight

    The digital evolution has created the emergence of new roles like the Chief Digital Officer and Chief Data Officer. They are a response to bridge the skill gap that exists between the business and technology. CIOs need to focus on building effective partnerships to better communicate the business value generated by technology or they risk becoming obsolete.

    Create a relationship journal to effectively manage your stakeholders

    A diagram of relationship journal

    Info-Tech's approach

    From managing relationships with friends to key business partners, your success will come from having the right game plan. Productive relationships are more than managing stakeholders to support IT initiatives. You need to effectively influence those who have the potential to champion or derail your strategic priorities. Understanding differences in work styles is fundamental to adapting your communication approach to various personalities and situations.

    A diagram that shows from 1.1 to 4.1

    A diagram of business archetypes

    Summary of Insights

    Insight 1: Expand your sphere of influence
    It's not just about gaining a volume of acquaintances. Figure out where you want to spend your limited time, energy, and effort to develop a network of professional allies who will support and help you achieve your strategic priorities.

    Insight 2: Know thyself first and foremost
    Healthy relationships start with understanding your own working style, preferences, and underlying motivations that drive your behavior and ultimately your expectations of others. A win/win scenario emerges when both parties' needs for inclusion, influence, and connection are met or mutually conceded.

    Insight 3: Walk a mile in their shoes
    If you want to build successful partnerships, you need to understand the context in which your stakeholder operates: their motivations, desires, priorities, commitments, and challenges. This will help you adapt as their needs shift and, moreover, leverage empathy to identify the best tactics for different working styles.

    Insight 4: Nurturing relationships is a daily commitment
    Building, fostering, and maintaining professional relationships requires a daily commitment to a plan to get through tough times, competing priorities, and conflicts to build trust, respect, and a shared sense of purpose.

    Related Info-Tech Research

    Supplement your CIO journey with these related blueprints.

    Photo of First 100 Days as CIO

    First 100 Days as CIO

    Photo of Become a Strategic CIO

    Become a Strategic CIO

    Photo of Improve IT Team Effectiveness

    Improve IT Team Effectiveness

    Photo of Become a Transformational CIO

    Become a Transformational CIO

    Executive Brief Case Study

    Logo of Multicap Limited

    • Industry: Community Services
    • Source: Scott Lawry, Head of Digital

    Conversation From Down Under

    What are the hallmarks of a healthy relationship with your key stakeholders?
    "In my view, I work with partners like they are an extension of my team, as we rely on each other to achieve mutual success. Partnerships involve a deeper, more intimate relationship, where both parties are invested in the long-term success of the business."

    Why is it important to understand your stakeholder's situation?
    "It's crucial to remember that every IT project is a business project, and vice versa. As technology leaders, our role is to demystify technology by focusing on its business value. Empathy is a critical trait in this endeavor, as it allows us to see a stakeholder's situation from a business perspective, align better with the business vision and goals, and ultimately connect with people, rather than just technology."

    How do you stay committed during tough times?
    "I strive to leave emotions at the door and avoid taking a defensive stance. It's important to remain neutral and not personalize the issue. Instead, stay focused on the bigger picture and goals, and try to find a common purpose. To build credibility, it's also essential to fact-check assumptions regularly. By following these principles, I approach situations with a clear mind and better perspective, which ultimately helps achieve success."

    Photo of Scott Lawry, Head Of Digital at Multicap Limited

    Key Takeaways

    In a recent conversation with a business executive about the evolving role of CIOs, she expressed: "It's the worst time to be perceived as a technology evangelist and even worse to be perceived as an average CIO who can't communicate the business value of technology."

    This highlights the immense pressure many CIOs face when evolving beyond just managing the IT factory.

    The modern CIO is a business leader who can forge relationships and expand their influence to transform IT into a core driver of business value.

    Stakeholder Sentiment

    Identify key stakeholders and their perception of IT's effectiveness

    1.1 Identify Key Stakeholders

    A diagram of Identify Key Stakeholders

    Identify and prioritize your key stakeholders. Be diligent with stakeholder identification. Use a broad view to identify stakeholders who are known versus those who are "hidden." If stakeholders are missed, then so are opportunities to expand your sphere of influence.

    1.2 Understand Stakeholder's Perception of IT

    A diagram that shows Info-Tech's Diagnostic Reports and Hospital Authority XYZ

    Assess stakeholder sentiments from Info-Tech's diagnostic reports and/or your organization's satisfaction surveys to help identify individuals who may have the greatest influence to support or detract IT's performance and those who are passive observers that can become your greatest allies. Determine where best to focus your limited time amid competing priorities by focusing on the long-term goals that support the organization's vision.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Understand which individuals can directly or indirectly influence your ability to achieve your priorities. Look inside and out, as you may find influencers beyond the obvious peers or executives in an organization. Influence can result from expansive connections, power of persuasion, and trust to get things done.

    Visit Info-Tech's Diagnostic Programs

    Activity: Identify and Prioritize Stakeholders

    30-60 minutes

    1.1 Identify Key Stakeholders

    Start with the key stakeholders that are known to you. Take a 360-degree view of both internal and external connections. Leverage external professional & network platforms (e.g. LinkedIn), alumni connections, professional associations, forums, and others that can help flush out hidden stakeholders.

    1.2 Prioritize Key Stakeholders

    Use stakeholder satisfaction surveys like Info-Tech's Business Vision diagnostic as a starting point to identify those who are your allies and those who have the potential to derail IT's success, your professional brand, and your strategic priorities. Review the results of the diagnostic reports to flush out those who are:

    • Resisters: Vocal about their dissatisfaction with IT's performance and actively sabotage or disrupt
    • Skeptics: Disengaged, passive observers
    • Ambassadors: Aligned but don't proactively support
    • Champions: Actively engaged and will proactively support your success

    Consider the following:

    • Influencers may not have formal authority within an organization but have relationships with your stakeholders.
    • Influencers may be hiding in many places, like the coach of your daughter's soccer team who rows with your CEO.
    • Prioritize, i.e. three degrees of separation due to potential diverse reach of influence.

    Key Output: Create a tab for your most critical stakeholders.

    A diagram that shows profile tabs

    Download the Personal Relationship Management Journal Template.

    Understand stakeholders' business

    Create a stakeholder profile to understand the context in which stakeholders operate.

    2.1 Create individual profile for each stakeholder

    A diagram that shows different stakeholder questions

    Collect and analyze key information to understand the context in which your stakeholders operate. Use the information to derive insights about their mandate, accountabilities, strategic goals, investment priorities, and performance metrics and challenges they may be facing.

    Stakeholder profiles can be used to help design the best approach for personal interactions with individuals as their business context changes.

    If you are short on time, use this checklist to gather information:

    • Stakeholder's business unit (BU) strategy goals
    • High-level organizational chart
    • BU operational model or capability map
    • Key performance metrics
    • Projects underway and planned
    • Financial budget (if available)
    • Milestone dates for key commitments and events
    • External platforms like LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter, Slack, Instagram, Meetup, blogs

    Info-Tech Insight

    Understanding what stakeholders want (and more importantly, what they don't) requires knowing their business and the personal and social circumstances underlying their priorities and behaviors.

    Activity: Create a stakeholder profile

    30-60 minutes

    2.1.0 Understand stakeholder's business context

    Create a profile for each of your priority stakeholders to document their business context. Review all the information collected to understand their mandate, core accountability, and business capabilities. The context in which individuals operate is a window into the motivations, pressures, and vested interests that will influence the intersectionality between their expectations and yours.

    2.1.1 Document Observable Challenges as Private Notes

    Crushing demands and competing priorities can lead to tension and stress as people jockey to safeguard their time. Identify some observable challenges to create greater situational awareness. Possible underlying factors:

    • Sudden shifts/changes in mandate
    • Performance (operations, projects)
    • Finance
    • Resource and talent gaps
    • Politics
    • Personal circumstances
    • Capability gaps/limitations
    • Capacity challenges

    A diagram that shows considerations of this activity.

    Analyze Stakeholder's Work Style

    Adapt communication styles to the situational context in which your stakeholders operate

    2.2 Determine the ideal approach for engaging each stakeholder

    Each stakeholder has a preferred modality of working which is further influenced by dynamic situations. Some prefer to meet frequently to collaborate on solutions while others prefer to analyze data in solitude before presenting information to substantiate recommendations. However, fostering trust requires:

    1. Understanding your preferred default when engaging others.
    2. Knowing where you need to expand your skills.
    3. Identifying which skills to activate for different professional scenarios.

    Adapting your communication style to create productive interactions will require a diverse arsenal of interpersonal skills that you can draw upon as situations shift. The ability to adapt your work style to dial any specific trait up or down will help to increase your powers of persuasion and influence.

    "There are only two ways to influence human behavior: you can manipulate it, or you can inspire it." – Simon Sinek

    Activity: Identify Engagement Strategies

    30 minutes

    2.2.0 Establish work styles

    Every individual has a preferred style of working. Determine work styles starting with self-awareness:

    • Express myself - How you communicate and interact with others
    • Expression by others - How you want others to communicate and interact with you

    Through observation and situational awareness, we can make inferences about people's work style.

    • Observations - Observable traits of other people's work style
    • Situations - Personal and professional circumstances that influence how we communicate and interact with one another

    Where appropriate and when opportunities arise, ask individuals directly about their preferred work styles and method for communication. What is their preferred method of communication? During a normal course of interaction vs. for urgent priorities?

    2.2.1 Brainstorm possible engagement strategies

    Consider the following when brainstorming engagement strategies for different work styles.

    A table of involvement, influence, and connection.

    Think engagement strategies in different professional scenarios:

    • Meetings - Where and how you connect
    • Communicating - How and what you communicate to create connection
    • Collaborating - What degree of involved in shared activities
    • Persuading - How you influence or direct others to get things done

    Expand New Interpersonal Skills

    Use the Business Archetypes to brainstorm possible approaches for engaging with different work styles. Additional communication and engagement tactics may need to be considered based on circumstances and changing situations.

    A diagram that shows business archetypes and engagement strategies.

    Communicate Effectively

    Productive communication is a dialogue that requires active listening, tailoring messages to fluid situations, and seeking feedback to adapt.

    A diagram of elements that contributes to better align intention and impact

    Be Relevant

    • Understand why you need to communicate
    • Determine what you need to convey
    • Tailor your message to what matters to the audience and their context
    • Identify the most appropriate medium based on the situation

    Be Consistent and Accurate

    • Say what you mean and mean what you say to avoid duplicity
    • Information should be accurate and complete
    • Communicate truthfully; do not make false promises or hide bad news
    • Don't gossip

    Be Clear and Concise

    • Keep it simple and avoid excessive jargon
    • State asks upfront to set intention and transparency
    • Avoid ambiguity and focus on outcomes over details
    • Be brief and to the point or risk losing stakeholder's attention

    Be Attentive and Authentic

    • Stay engaged and listen actively
    • Be curious and inquire for clarification or explanation
    • Be flexible to adapt to both verbal and non-verbal cues
    • Be authentic in your approach to sharing yourself
    • Avoid "canned" approaches

    A diagram of listen, observe, reflect.


    "Good communication is the bridge between confusion and clarity."– Nat Turner (LinkedIn, 2020)

    Exemplar: Engaging With Jane

    A diagram that shows Exemplar: Engaging With Jane

    Exemplar: Engaging With Ali

    A diagram that shows Exemplar: Engaging With Ali

    Develop an Action Plan

    Moving from intent to action requires a plan to ensure you stay committed through the peaks and troughs.

    Create Your 120-Day Plan

    An action plan example

    Key elements of the action plan:

    • Strategic priorities – Your top focus
    • Objective – Your goals
    • 30-60-90-120 Day Topics – Key agenda items
    • Meeting Progress Notes – Key takeaways from meetings
    • Private Notes – Confidential observations

    Investing in relationships is a long-term process. You need to accumulate enough trust to trade or establish coalitions to expand your sphere of influence. Even the strongest of professional ties will have their bouts of discord. To remain committed to building the relationship during difficult periods, use an action plan that helps you stay grounded around:

    • Shared purpose
    • Removing emotion from the situation
    • Continuously learning from every interaction

    Photo of Angela Diop
    "Make intentional actions to set intentionality. Plans are good to keep you grounded and focused especially when relationship go through ups and down and there are changes: to new people and new relationships."
    – Angela Diop, Senior Director, Executive Services, Info-Tech & former VP of Information Services with Unity Health Care

    Activity: Design a Tailored Action Plan

    30-60 minutes

    3.1.0 Determine your personal expectations

    Establish your personal goals and expectations around what you are seeking from the relationship. Determine the strength of your current connection and identify where you want to move the relationship across the continuum of commitment.

    Use insights from your stakeholder's profile to explore their span of influence and degree of interest in supporting your strategic priorities.

    3.1.1 Determine what you want from the relationship

    Based on your personal goals, identify where you want to move the relationship across the continuum of commitment: What are you hoping to achieve from the relationship? How will this help create a win/win situation for both you and the key stakeholder?

    A diagram of Continuum of Commitment.

    3.1.2 Identify your metrics for progress

    Fostering relationships take time and commitment. Utilizing metrics or personal success criteria for each of your focus areas will help you stay on track and find opportunities to make each engagement valuable instead of being transactional.

    A graph that shows influence vs interest.

    Make your action plan impactful

    Level of Connection

    The strength of the relationship will help inform the level of time and effort needed to achieve your goals.

    • Is this a new or existing relationship?
    • How often do you connect with this individual?
    • Are the connections driven by a shared purpose or transactional as needs arise?

    Focus on Relational Value

    Cultivate your network and relationship with the goal of building emotional connection, understanding, and trust around your shared purpose and organization's vision through regular dialogue. Be mindful of transactional exchanges ("quid pro quo") to be strategic about its use. Treat every interaction as equally important regardless of agenda, duration, or channel of communication.

    Plan and Prepare

    Everyone's time is valuable, and you need to come prepared with a clear understanding of why you are engaging. Think about the intentionality of the conversation:

    • Gain buy-in
    • Create transparency
    • Specific ask
    • Build trust and respect
    • Provide information to clarify, clear, or contain a situation

    Non-Verbal Communication Matters

    Communication is built on both overt expressions and subtext. While verbal communication is the most recognizable form, non-lexical components of verbal communication (i.e. paralanguage) can alter stated vs. intended meaning. Engage with the following in mind:

    • Tone, pitch, speed, and hesitation
    • Facial expressions and gestures
    • Choice of channel for engagement

    Exemplar: Action Plan for VP, Digital

    A diagram that shows Exemplar: Action Plan for VP, Digital

    Make Relationship Management a Daily Habit

    Management plans are living documents and need to be flexible to adapt to changes in stakeholder context.

    Monitor and Adjust to Communicate Strategically

    A diagram that shows Principles for Effective Communication and Key Measures

    Building trust takes time and commitment. Treat every conversation with your key stakeholders as an investment in building the social capital to expand your span of influence when and where you need it to go. This requires making relationship management a daily habit. Action plans need to be a living document that is your personal journal to document your observations, feelings, and actions. Such a plan enables you to make constant adjustments along the relationship journey.

    "Without involvement, there is no commitment. Mark it down, asterisk it, circle it, underline it."– Stephen Convey (LinkedIn, 2016)

    Capture some simple metrics

    If you can't measure your actions, you can't manage the relationship.

    An example of measures: what, why, how - metrics, and intended outcome.

    While a personal relationship journal is not a formal performance management tool, identifying some tangible measures will improve the likelihood of aligning your intent with outcomes. Good measures will help you focus your efforts, time, and resources appropriately.

    Keep the following in mind:

    1. WHAT are you trying to measure?
      Specific to the situation or scenario
    2. WHY is this important?
      Relevant to your personal goals
    3. HOW will you measure?
      Achievable and quantifiable
    4. WHAT will the results tell you?
      Intended outcome that is directional

    Summary of accomplishments

    Knowledge Gained

    • Relationship management is critical to a CIO's success
    • A personal relationship journal will help build:
      • Customized approach to engaging stakeholders
      • New communication skills to adapt to different work styles

    New Concepts

    • Work style assessment framework and engagement strategies
    • Effective communication strategies
    • Continuum of commitment to establish personal goals

    Approach to Creating a Personal Journal

    • Step-by-step approach to create a personal journal
    • Key elements for inclusion in a journal
    • Exemplar and recommendations

    Related Info-Tech Research

    Photo of Tech Trends and Priorities Research Centre

    Tech Trends and Priorities Research Centre

    Access Info-Tech's Tech Trend reports and research center to learn about current industry trends, shifts in markets, and disruptions that are impacting your industry and sector. This is a great starting place to gain insights into how the ecosystem is changing your business and the role of IT within it.

    Photo of Embed Business Relationship Management in IT

    Embed Business Relationship Management in IT

    Create a business relationship management (BRM) function in your program to foster a more effective partnership with the business and drive IT's value to the organization.

    Photo of Become a Transformational CIO

    Become a Transformational CIO

    Collaborate with the business to lead transformation and leave behind a legacy of growth.

    Appendix: Framework

    Content:

    • Adaptation of DiSC profile assessment
    • DiSC Profile Assessment
    • FIRO-B Framework
    • Experience Cube

    Info-Tech's Adaption of DiSC Assessment

    A diagram of business archetypes

    Info-Tech's Business Archetypes was created based on our analysis of the DiSC Profile and Myers-Briggs FIRO-B personality assessment tools that are focused on assessing interpersonal traits to better understand personalities.

    The adaptation is due in part to Info-Tech's focus on not designing a personality assessment tool as this is neither the intent nor the expertise of our services. Instead, the primary purpose of this adaptation is to create a simple framework for our members to base their observations of behavioral cues to identify appropriate communication styles to better interact with key stakeholders.

    Cautionary note:
    Business archetypes are personas and should not be used to label, make assumptions and/or any other biased judgements about individual personalities. Every individual has all elements and aspects of traits across various spectrums. This must always remain at the forefront when utilizing any type of personality assessments or frameworks.

    Click here to learn about DiSC Profile
    Click here learn about FIRO-B
    Click here learn about Experience Cube

    DiSC Profile Assessment

    A photo of DiSC Profile Assessment

    What is DiSC?

    DisC® is a personal assessment tool that was originally developed in 1928 by psychologist William Moulton Marston, who designed it to predict job performance. The tool has evolved and is now widely used by thousands of organizations around the world, from large government agencies and Fortune 500 companies to nonprofit and small businesses, to help improve teamwork, communication, and productivity in the workplace. The tool provides a common language people can use to better understand themselves and those they interact with - and use this knowledge to reduce conflict and improve working relationships.

    What does DiSC mean?

    DiSC is an acronym that stands for the four main personality profiles described in the Everything DiSC model: (D)ominance, (i)nfluence, (S)teadiness, (C)onscientiousness

    People with (D) personalities tend to be confident and emphasize accomplishing bottom-line results.
    People with (i) personalities tend to be more open and emphasize relationships and influencing or persuading others.
    People with (S) personalities tend to be dependable and emphasize cooperation and sincerity.
    People with (C) personalities tend to emphasize quality, accuracy, expertise, and competency.

    Go to this link to explore the DiSC styles

    FIRO-B® – Interpersonal Assessment

    A diagram of FIRO framework

    What is FIRO workplace relations?

    The Fundamental Interpersonal Relations Orientation Behavior (FIRO-B®) tool has been around for forty years. The tool assesses your interpersonal needs and the impact of your behavior in the workplace. The framework reveals how individuals can shape and adapt their individual behaviors, influence others effectively, and build trust among colleagues. It has been an excellent resource for coaching individuals and teams about the underlying drivers behind their interactions with others to effectively build successful working relationships.

    What does the FIRO framework measure?

    The FIRO framework addresses five key questions that revolve around three interpersonal needs. Fundamentally, the framework focuses on how you want to express yourself toward others and how you want others to behave toward you. This interaction will ultimately result in the universal needs for (a) inclusion, (b) control, and (c) affection. The insights from the results are intended to help individuals adjust their behavior in relationships to get what they need while also building trust with others. This will allow you to better predict and adapt to different situations in the workplace.

    How can FIRO influence individual and team performance in the workplace?

    FIRO helps people recognize where they may be giving out mixed messages and prompts them to adapt their exhibited behaviors to build trust in their relationships. It also reveals ways of improving relationships by showing individuals how they are seen by others, and how this external view may differ from how they see themselves. Using this lens empowers people to adjust their behavior, enabling them to effectively influence others to achieve high performance.

    In team settings, it is a rich source of information to explore motivations, underlying tensions, inconsistent behaviors, and the mixed messages that can lead to mistrust and derailment. It demonstrates how people may approach teamwork differently and explains the potential for inefficiencies and delays in delivery. Through the concept of behavioral flexibility, it helps defuse cultural stereotypes and streamline cross-cultural teams within organizations.

    Go to this link to explore FIRO-B for Business

    Experience Cube

    A diagram of experience cube model.

    What is an experience cube?

    The Experience Cube model was developed by Gervase Bushe, a professor of Leadership and Organization at the Simon Fraser University's school of Business and a thought leader in the field of organizational behavior. The experience cube is intended as a tool to plan and manage conversations to communicate more effectively in the moment. It does this by promoting self-awareness to better reduce anxiety and adapt to evolving and uncertain situations.

    How does the experience cube work?

    Using the four elements of the experience cube (Observations, Thoughts, Feelings, and Wants) helps you to separate your experience with the situation from your potential judgements about the situation. This approach removes blame and minimizes defensiveness, facilitating a positive discussion. The goal is to engage in a continuous internal feedback loop that allows you to walk through all four quadrants in the moment to help promote self-awareness. With heightened self-awareness, you may (1) remain curious and ask questions, (2) check-in for understanding and clarification, and (3) build consensus through agreement on shared purpose and next steps.

    Observations: Sensory data (information you take in through your senses), primarily what you see and hear. What a video camera would record.

    Thoughts: The meaning you add to your observations (i.e. the way you make sense of them, including your beliefs, expectations, assumptions, judgments, values, and principles). We call this the "story you make up."

    Feelings: Your emotional or physiological response to the thoughts and observations. Feelings words such as sad, mad, glad, scared, or a description of what is happening in your body.

    Wants: Clear description of the outcome you seek. Wants go deeper than a simple request for action. Once you clearly state what you want, there may be different ways to achieve it.

    Go to this link to explore more: Experience Cube

    Research Contributors and Experts

    Photo of Joanne Lee
    Joanne Lee
    Principal, Research Director, CIO Advisory
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Joanne is a professional executive with over twenty-five years of experience in digital technology and management consulting spanning healthcare, government, municipal, and commercial sectors across Canada and globally. She has successfully led several large, complex digital and business transformation programs. A consummate strategist, her expertise spans digital and technology strategy, organizational redesign, large complex digital and business transformation, governance, process redesign, and PPM. Prior to joining Info-Tech Research Group, Joanne was a Director with KPMG's CIO Advisory management consulting services and the Digital Health practice lead for Western Canada. She brings a practical and evidence-based approach to complex problems enabled by technology.

    Joanne holds a Master's degree in Business and Health Policy from the University of Toronto and a Bachelor of Science (Nursing) from the University of British Columbia.



    Photo of Gord Harrison
    Gord Harrison
    Senior Vice President, Research and Advisory
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Gord Harrison, SVP, Research and Consulting, has been with Info-Tech Research Group since 2002. In that time, Gord leveraged his experience as the company's CIO, VP Research Operations, and SVP Research to bring the consulting and research teams together under his current role, and to further develop Info-Tech's practical, tactical, and value-oriented research product to the benefit of both organizations.

    Prior to Info-Tech, Gord was an IT consultant for many years with a focus on business analysis, software development, technical architecture, and project management. His background of educational game software development, and later, insurance industry application development gave him a well-rounded foundation in many IT topics. Gord prides himself on bringing order out of chaos and his customer-first, early value agile philosophy keeps him focused on delivering exceptional experiences to our customers.



    Photo of Angela Diop
    Angela Diop
    Senior Director, Executive Services
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Angela has over twenty-five years of experience in healthcare, as both a healthcare provider and IT professional. She has spent over fifteen years leading technology departments and implementing, integrating, managing, and optimizing patient-facing and clinical information systems. She believes that a key to a healthcare organization's ability to optimize health information systems and infrastructure is to break the silos that exist in healthcare organizations.

    Prior to joining Info-Tech, Angela was the Vice President of Information Services with Unity Health Care. She has demonstrated leadership and success in this area by fostering environments where business and IT collaborate to create systems and governance that are critical to providing patient care and sustaining organizational health.

    Angela has a Bachelor of Science in Systems Engineering and Design from the University of Illinois and a Doctorate of Naturopathic Medicine from Bastyr University. She is a Certified CIO with the College of Healthcare Information Management Executives. She is a two-time Health Information Systems Society (HIMSS) Davies winner.



    Photo of Edison Barreto
    Edison Barreto
    Senior Director, Executive Services
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Edison is a dynamic technology leader with experience growing different enterprises and changing IT through creating fast-paced organizations with cultural, modernization, and digital transformation initiatives. He is well versed in creating IT and business cross-functional leadership teams to align business goals with IT modernization and revenue growth. Over twenty-five years of Gaming, Hospitality, Retail, and F&B experience has given him a unique perspective on guiding and coaching the creation of IT department roadmaps to focus on business needs and execute successful changes.

    Edison has broad business sector experience, including:
    Hospitality, Gaming, Sports and Entertainment, IT policy and oversight, IT modernization, Cloud first programs, R&D, PCI, GRDP, Regulatory oversight, Mergers acquisitions and divestitures.



    Photo of Mike Tweedie
    Mike Tweedie
    Practice Lead, CIO Strategy
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Michael Tweedie is the Practice Lead, CIO – IT Strategy at Info-Tech Research Group, specializing in creating and delivering client-driven, project-based, practical research, and advisory. He brings more than twenty-five years of experience in technology and IT services as well as success in large enterprise digital transformations.

    Prior to joining Info-Tech, Mike was responsible for technology at ADP Canada. In that role, Mike led several large transformation projects that covered core infrastructure, applications, and services and worked closely with and aligned vendors and partners. The results were seamless and transparent migrations to current services, like public cloud, and a completely revamped end-user landscape that allowed for and supported a fully remote workforce.

    Prior to ADP, Mike was the North American Head of Engineering and Service Offerings for a large French IT services firm, with a focus on cloud adoption and complex ERP deployment and management; he managed large, diverse global teams and had responsibilities for end-to-end P&L management.

    Mike holds a Bachelor's degree in Architecture from Ryerson University.



    Photo of Carlene McCubbin
    Carlene McCubbin
    Practice Lead, People and Leadership
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Carlene McCubbin is a Research Lead for the CIO Advisory Practice at Info-Tech Research Group covering key topics in operating models & design, governance, and human capital development.

    During her tenure at Info-Tech, Carlene has led the development of Info-Tech's Organization and Leadership practice and worked with multiple clients to leverage the methodologies by creating custom programs to fit each organization's needs.

    Before joining Info-Tech, Carlene received her Master of Communications Management from McGill University, where she studied development of internal and external communications, government relations, and change management. Her education honed her abilities in rigorous research, data analysis, writing, and understanding the organization holistically, which has served her well in the business IT world.



    Photo of Anubhav Sharma
    Anubhav Sharma
    Research Director, CIO Strategy
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Anubhav is a digital strategy and execution professional with extensive experience in leading large-scale transformation mandates for organizations both in North America and globally, including defining digital strategies for leading banks and spearheading a large-scale transformation project for a global logistics pioneer across ten countries. Prior to joining Info-Tech Research Group, he held several industry and consulting positions in Fortune 500 companies driving their business and technology strategies. In 2023, he was recognized as a "Top 50 Digital Innovator in Banking" by industry peers.

    Anubhav holds an MBA in Strategy from HEC Paris, a Master's degree in Finance from IIT-Delhi, and a Bachelor's degree in Engineering.



    Photo of Kim Osborne-Rodriguez
    Kim Osborne-Rodriguez
    Research Director, CIO Strategy
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Kim is a professional engineer and Registered Communications Distribution Designer (RCDD) with over a decade of experience in management and engineering consulting spanning healthcare, higher education, and commercial sectors. She has worked on some of the largest hospital construction projects in Canada, from early visioning and IT strategy through to design, specifications, and construction administration. She brings a practical and evidence-based approach to digital transformation, with a track record of supporting successful implementations.

    Kim holds a Bachelor's degree in Mechatronics Engineering from University of Waterloo.



    Photo of Amanda Mathieson
    Amanda Mathieson
    Research Director, People and Leadership
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Amanda joined Info-Tech Research Group in 2019 and brings twenty years of expertise working in Canada, the US, and globally. Her expertise in leadership development, organizational change management, and performance and talent management comes from her experience in various industries spanning pharmaceutical, retail insurance, and financial services. She takes a practical, experiential approach to people and leadership development that is grounded in adult learning methodologies and leadership theory. She is passionate about identifying and developing potential talent, as well as ensuring the success of leaders as they transition into more senior roles.

    Amanda has a Bachelor of Commerce degree and Master of Arts in Organization and Leadership Development from Fielding Graduate University, as well as a post-graduate diploma in Adult Learning Methodologies from St. Francis Xavier University. She also has certifications in Emotional Intelligence – EQ-i 2.0 & 360, Prosci ADKAR® Change Management, and Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Step I and II.

    Bibliography

    Bacey, Christopher. "KPMG/Harvey Nash CIO Survey finds most organizations lack enterprise-wide digital strategy." Harvey Nash/KPMG CIO Survey. Accessed Jan. 6, 2023. KPMG News Perspective - KPMG.us.com

    Calvert, Wu-Pong Susanna. "The Importance of Rapport. Five tips for creating conversational reciprocity." Psychology Today Magazine. June 30, 2022. Accessed Feb. 10, 2023. psychologytoday.com/blog

    Coaches Council. "14 Ways to Build More Meaningful Professional Relationships." Forbes Magazine. September 16, 2020. Accessed Feb. 20, 2023. forbes.com/forbescoachescouncil

    Council members. "How to Build Authentic Business Relationships." Forbes Magazine. June 15, 2021. Accessed Jan. 15, 2023. Forbes.com/business council

    Deloitte. "Chief Information Officer (CIO) Labs. Transform and advance the role of the CIO." The CIO program. Accessed Feb. 5, 2021.

    Dharsarathy, Anusha et al. "The CIO challenge: Modern business needs a new kind of tech leader." McKinsey and Company. January 27, 2020. Accessed Feb 2023. Mckinsey.com

    DiSC profile. "What is DiSC?" DiSC Profile Website. Accessed Feb. 5, 2023. discprofile.com

    FIRO Assessment. "Better working relationships". Myers Brigg Website. Resource document downloaded Feb. 10, 2023. myersbriggs.com/article

    Fripp, Patricia. "Frippicisms." Website. Accessed Feb. 25, 2023. fripp.com

    Grossman, Rhys. "The Rise of the Chief Digital Officer." Russell Reynolds Insights, January 1, 2012. Accessed Jan. 5, 2023. Rise of the Chief Digital Officer - russellreynolds.com

    Kambil, Ajit. "Influencing stakeholders: Persuade, trade, or compel." Deloitte Article. August 9, 2017. Accessed Feb. 19, 2023. www2.deloitte.com/insights

    Kambil, Ajit. "Navigating the C-suite: Managing Stakeholder Relationships." Deloitte Article. March 8, 2017. Accessed Feb. 19, 2023. www2.deloitte.com/insights

    Korn Ferry. "Age and tenure in the C-suite." Kornferry.com. Accessed Jan. 6, 2023. Korn Ferry Study Reveals Trends by Title and Industry

    Kumthekar, Uday. "Communication Channels in Project". Linkedin.com, 3 March 2020. Accessed April 27, 2023. Linkedin.com/Pulse/Communication Channels

    McWilliams, Allison. "Why You Need Effective Relationships at Work." Psychology Today Magazine. May 5, 2022. Accessed Feb. 11, 2023. psychologytoday.com/blog

    McKinsey & Company. "Why do most transformations fail? A conversation with Harry Robinson." Transformation Practice. July 2019. Accessed Jan. 10, 2023. Mckinsey.com

    Mind Tools Content Team. "Building Good Work Relationships." MindTools Article. Accessed Feb. 11, 2023. mindtools.com/building good work relationships

    Pratt, Mary. "Why the CIO-CFO relationship is key to digital success." TechTarget Magazine. November 11, 2021. Accessed Feb. 2023. Techtarget.com

    LaMountain, Dennis. "Quote of the Week: No Involvement, No Commitment". Linkedin.com, 3 April 2016. Accessed April 27, 2023. Linkedin.com/pulse/quote-week-involvement

    PwC Pulse Survey. "Managing Business Risks". PwC Library. 2022. Accessed Jan. 30, 2023. pwc.com/pulse-survey

    Rowell, Darin. "3 Traits of a Strong Professional Relationship." Harvard Business Review. August 8, 2019. Accessed Feb. 20, 2023. hbr.org/2019/Traits of a strong professional relationship

    Sinek, Simon. "The Optimism Company from Simon Sinek." Website. Image Source. Accessed, Feb. 21, 2023. simonsinek.com

    Sinek, Simon. "There are only two ways to influence human behavior: you can manipulate it or you can inspire it." Twitter. Dec 9, 2022. Accessed Feb. 20, 2023. twitter.com/simonsinek

    Whitbourne, Susan Krauss. "10 Ways to Measure the Health of Relationship." Psychology Today Magazine. Aug. 7, 2021. Accessed Jan. 30, 2023. psychologytoday.com/blog

    Modernize Data Architecture for Measurable Business Results

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}387|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.5/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: After each Info-Tech experience, we ask our members to quantify the real-time savings, monetary impact, and project improvements our research helped them achieve.
    • member rating average days saved: Read what our members are saying
    • Parent Category Name: Data Management
    • Parent Category Link: /data-management
    • Data architecture projects have often failed in the past, causing businesses today to view the launch of a new project as a costly initiative with unclear business value.
    • New technologies in big data and analytics are requiring organizations to modernize their data architecture, but most organizations have failed to spend the time and effort refining the appropriate data models and blueprints that enable them to do so.
    • As the benefits for data architecture are often diffused across an organization’s information management practice, it can be difficult for the business to understand the value and necessity of data architecture.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • At the heart of tomorrow’s insights-driven enterprises is a modern data environment anchored in fit-for-purpose data architectures.
    • The role of traditional data architecture is transcending beyond organizational boundaries and its focus is shifting from “keeping the lights on” (i.e. operational data and BI) to providing game-changing insights gleaned from untapped big data.

    Impact and Result

    • Perform a diagnostic assessment of your present day architecture and identify the capabilities of your future “to be” environment to position your organization to capitalize on new opportunities in the data space.
    • Use Info-Tech’s program diagnostic assessment and guidance for developing a strategic roadmap to support your team in building a fit-for purpose data architecture practice.
    • Create a data delivery architecture that harmonizes traditional and modern architectural opportunities.

    Modernize Data Architecture for Measurable Business Results Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should modernize your data architecture, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Develop a data architecture vision

    Plan your data architecture project and align it with the business and its strategic vision.

    • Modernize Data Architecture for Measurable Business Results – Phase 1: Develop a Data Architecture Vision
    • Modernize Data Architecture Project Charter
    • Data Architecture Strategic Planning Workbook

    2. Assess data architecture capabilities

    Evaluate the current and target capabilities of your data architecture, using the accompanying diagnostic assessment to identify performance gaps and build a fit-for-purpose practice.

    • Modernize Data Architecture for Measurable Business Results – Phase 2: Assess Data Architecture Capabilities
    • Data Architecture Assessment and Roadmap Tool
    • Initiative Definition Tool

    3. Develop a data architecture roadmap

    Translate your planned initiatives into a sequenced roadmap.

    • Modernize Data Architecture for Measurable Business Results – Phase 3: Develop a Data Architecture Roadmap
    • Modernize Data Architecture Roadmap Presentation Template
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Modernize Data Architecture for Measurable Business Results

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Develop a Data Architecture (DA) Vision

    The Purpose

    Discuss key business drivers and strategies.

    Identify data strategies.

    Develop a data architecture vision.

    Assess data architecture practice capabilities. 

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A data architecture vision aligned with the business.

    A completed assessment of the organization’s current data architecture practice capabilities.

    Identification of "to be" data architecture practice capabilities.

    Identification of key gaps. 

    Activities

    1.1 Explain approach and value proposition

    1.2 Discuss business vision and key drivers

    1.3 Discover business pain points and needs

    1.4 Determine data strategies

    1.5 Assess DA practice capabilities

    Outputs

    Data strategies

    Data architecture vision

    Current and target capabilities for the modernized DA practice

    2 Assess DA Core Capabilities (Part 1)

    The Purpose

    Assess the enterprise data model (EDM).

    Assess current and target data warehouse, BI/analytics, and big data architectures.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A completed assessment of the organization’s current EDM, data warehouse, BI and analytics, and big data architectures.

    Identification of "to be" capabilities for the organization’s EDM, data warehouse, BI and analytics, and big data architectures.

    Identification of key gaps.

    Activities

    2.1 Present an overarching DA capability model

    2.2 Assess current and target EDM capabilities

    2.3 Assess current/target data warehouse, BI/analytics, and big data architectures

    2.4 Identify gaps and high level strategies

    Outputs

    Target capabilities for EDM

    Target capabilities for data warehouse architecture, BI architecture, and big data architecture

    3 Assess DA Core Capabilities (Part 2)

    The Purpose

    Assess EDM.

    Assess current/target MDM, metadata, data integration, and content architectures.

    Assess dynamic data models.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A completed assessment of the organization’s current MDM, metadata, data integration, and content architectures.

    Identification of “to be” capabilities for the organization’s MDM, metadata, data integration, and content architectures.

    Identification of key gaps.

    Activities

    3.1 Present an overarching DA capability model

    3.2 Assess current and target MDM, metadata, data integration, and content architectures

    3.3 Assess data lineage and data delivery model

    3.4 Identify gaps and high level strategies

    Outputs

    Target capabilities for MDM architecture, metadata architecture, data integration architecture, and document & content architecture

    Target capabilities for data lineage/delivery

    4 Analyze Gaps and Formulate Strategies

    The Purpose

    Map performance gaps and document key initiatives from the diagnostic assessment.

    Identify additional gaps and action items.

    Formulate strategies and initiatives to address priority gaps. 

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Prioritized gap analysis.

    Improvement initiatives and related strategies.

    Activities

    4.1 Map performance gaps to business vision, pain points, and needs

    4.2 Identify additional gaps

    4.3 Consolidate/rationalize/prioritize gaps

    4.4 Formulate strategies and actions to address gaps

    Outputs

    Prioritized gaps

    Data architecture modernization strategies

    5 Develop a Data Architecture Roadmap

    The Purpose

    Plot initiatives and strategies on a strategic roadmap.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A roadmap with prioritized and sequenced initiatives.

    Milestone plan.

    Executive report. 

    Activities

    5.1 Transform strategies into a plan of action

    5.2 Plot actions on a prioritized roadmap

    5.3 Identify and discuss next milestone plan

    5.4 Compile an executive report

    Outputs

    Data architecture modernization roadmap

    Data architecture assessment and roadmap report (from analyst team)

    Transition Projects Over to the Service Desk

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}495|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Service Desk
    • Parent Category Link: /service-desk
    • IT suffers from a lack of strategy and plan for transitioning support processes to the service desk.
    • Lack of effective communication between the project delivery team and the service desk, leads to an inefficient knowledge transfer to the service desk.
    • New service is not prioritized and categorized, negatively impacting service levels and end-user satisfaction.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    Make sure to build a strong knowledge management strategy to identify, capture, and transfer knowledge from project delivery to the service desk.

    Impact and Result

    • Build touchpoints between the service desk and project delivery team and make strategic points in the project lifecycles to ensure service support is done effectively following the product launch.
    • Develop a checklist of action items on the initiatives that should be done following project delivery.
    • Build a training plan into the strategy to make sure service desk agents can handle tickets independently.

    Transition Projects Over to the Service Desk Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Transition Projects Over to the Service Desk – A guideline to walk you through transferring project support to the service desk.

    This storyboard will help you craft a project support plan to document information to streamline service support.

    • Transition Projects Over to the Service Desk Storyboard

    2. Project Handover and Checklist – A structured document to help you record information on the project and steps to take to transfer support.

    Use these two templates as a means of collaboration with the service desk to provide information on the application/product, and steps to take to make sure there are efficient service processes and knowledge is appropriately transferred to the service desk to support the service.

    • Project Handover Template
    • Service Support Transitioning Checklist
    [infographic]

    Further reading

    Transition Projects Over to the Service Desk

    Increase the success of project support by aligning your service desk and project team.

    Analyst Perspective

    Formalize your project support plan to shift customer service to the service desk.

    Photo of Mahmoud Ramin, Senior Research Analyst, Infrastructure and Operations, Info-Tech Research Group

    As a service support team member, you receive a ticket from an end user about an issue they’re facing with a new application. You are aware of the application release, but you don’t know how to handle the issue. So, you will need to either spend a long time investigating the issue via peer discussion and research or escalate it to the project team.

    Newly developed or improved services should be transitioned appropriately to the support team. Service transitioning should include planning, coordination, and communication. This helps project and support teams ensure that upon a service failure, affected end users receive timely and efficient customer support.

    At the first level, the project team and service desk should build a strategy around transitioning service support to the service desk by defining tasks, service levels, standards, and success criteria.

    In the second step, they should check the service readiness to shift support from the project team to the service desk.

    The next step is training on the new services via efficient communication and coordination between the two parties. The project team should allocate some time, according to the designed strategy, to train the service desk on the new/updated service. This will enable the service desk to provide independent service handling.

    This research walks you through the above steps in more detail and helps you build a checklist of action items to streamline shifting service support to the service desk.

    Mahmoud Ramin, PhD

    Senior Research Analyst
    Infrastructure and Operations
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    • IT suffers from a lack of strategy and planning for transitioning support processes to the service desk.
    • Lack of effective communication between the project delivery team and the service desk leads to an inefficient knowledge transfer to the service desk.
    • New service is not prioritized and categorized, negatively impacting service levels and end-user satisfaction.

    Common Obstacles

    • Building the right relationship between the service desk and project team is challenging, making support transition tedious.
    • The service desk is siloed; tasks and activities are loosely defined. Service delivery is inconsistent, which impacts customer satisfaction.
    • Lack of training on new services forces the service desk to unnecessarily escalate tickets to other levels and delays service delivery.

    Info-Tech’s Approach

    • Build touchpoints between the service desk and project delivery team and make strategic points in the project lifecycles to ensure service support is done effectively following the product launch.
    • Develop a checklist of action items on the initiatives that should be done following project delivery.
    • Build a training plan into the strategy to make sure service desk agents can handle tickets independently.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Make sure to build a strong knowledge management strategy to identify, capture, and transfer knowledge from project delivery to the service desk.

    A lack of formal service transition process presents additional challenges

    When there is no formal transition process following a project delivery, it will negatively impact project success and customer satisfaction.

    Service desk team:

    • You receive a request from an end user to handle an issue with an application or service that was recently released. You are aware of the features but don’t know how to solve this issue particularly.
    • You know someone in the project group who is familiar with the service, as he was involved in the project. You reach out to him, but he is very busy with another project.
    • You get back to the user to let them know that this will be done as soon as the specialist is available. But because there is no clarity on the scope of the issue, you cannot tell them when this will be resolved.
    • Lack of visibility and commitment to the service recovery will negatively impact end-user satisfaction with the service desk.

    Project delivery team:

    • You are working on an exciting project, approaching the deadline. Suddenly, you receive a ticket from a service desk agent asking you to solve an incident on a product that was released three months ago.
    • Given the deadline on the current project, you are stressed, thinking about just focusing on the projects. On the other hand, the issue with the other service is impacting multiple users and requires much attention.
    • You spend extra time handling the issue and get back to your project. But a few days later the same agent gets back to you to take care of the same issue.
    • This is negatively impacting your work quality and causing some friction between the project team and the service desk.

    Link how improvement in project transitioning to the service desk can help service support

    A successful launch can still be a failure if the support team isn't fully informed and prepared.

    • In such a situation, the project team sends impacted users a mass notification without a solid plan for training and no proper documentation.
    • To provide proper customer service, organizations should involve several stakeholder groups to collaborate for a seamless transition of projects to the service desk.
    • This shift in service support takes time and effort; however, via proper planning there will be less confusion around customer service, and it will be done much faster.
      • For instance, if AppDev is customizing an ERP solution without considering knowledge transfer to the service desk, relevant tickets will be unnecessarily escalated to the project team.
    • On the other hand, the service desk should update configuration items (CIs) and the service catalog and related requests, incidents, problems, and workarounds to the relevant assets and configurations.
    • In this transition process, knowledge transfer plays a key role. Users, the service desk, and other service support teams need to know how the new application or service works and how to manage it when an issue arises.
    • Without a knowledge transfer, service support will be forced to either reinvent the wheel or escalate the ticket to the development team. This will unnecessarily increase the time for ticket handling, increase cost per ticket, and reduce end-user satisfaction.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Involve the service desk in the transition process via clear communication, knowledge transfer, and staff training.

    Integrate the service desk into the project management lifecycle for a smooth transition of service support

    Service desk involvement in the development, testing, and maintenance/change activity steps of your project lifecycle will help you logically define the category and priority level of the service and enable service level improvement accordingly after the project goes live.

    Project management lifecycle

    As some of the support and project processes can be integrated, responsibility silos should be broken

    Processes are done by different roles. Determine roles and responsibilities for the overlapping processes to streamline service support transition to the service desk.

    The project team is dedicated to projects, while the support team focuses on customer service for several products.

    Siloed responsibilities:

    • Project team transfers the service fully to the service desk and leaves technicians alone for support without a good knowledge transfer.
    • Specialists who were involved in the project have deep knowledge about the product, but they are not involved in incident or problem management.
    • Service desk was not involved in the planning and execution processes, which leads to lack of knowledge about the product. This leaves the support team with some vague knowledge about the service, which negatively impacts the quality of incident and problem management.

    How to break the silos:

    Develop a tiered model for the service desk and include project delivery in the specialist tier.

    • Use tier 1 (service desk) as a single point of contact to support all IT services.
    • Have tier 2/3 as experts in technology. These agents are a part of the project team. They are also involved in incident management, root-cause analysis, and change management.

    Determine the interfaces

    At the project level, get a clear understanding of support capabilities and demands, and communicate them to the service desk to proactively bring them into the planning step.

    The following questions help you with an efficient plan for support transition

    Questions for support transition

    Clear responsibilities help you define the level of involvement in the overlapping processes

    Conduct a stakeholder analysis to identify the people that can help ensure the success of the transition.

    Goal: Create a prioritized list of people who are affected by the new service and will provide support.

    Why is stakeholder analysis essential?

    Why is stakeholder analysis essential

    Identify the tasks that are required for a successful project handover

    Embed the tasks that the project team should deliver before handing support to the service desk.

    Task/Activity Example

    Conduct administrative work in the application

    • New user setup
    • Password reset

    Update documentation

    • Prepare for knowledge transfer>
    Service request fulfillment/incident management
    • Assess potential bugs
    Technical support for systems troubleshooting
    • Configure a module in ITSM solution

    End-user training

    • FAQs
    • How-to questions
    Service desk training
    • Train technicians for troubleshooting

    Support management (monitoring, meeting SLAs)

    • Monitoring
    • Meeting SLAs

    Report on the service transitioning

    • Transition effectiveness
    • Four-week warranty period
    Ensure all policies follow the transition activities
    • The final week of transition, the service desk will be called to a meeting for final handover of incidents and problems

    Integrate project description and service priority throughout development phase

    Include the service desk in discussions about project description, so it will be enabled to define service priority level.

    • Project description will be useful for bringing the project forward to the change advisory board (CAB) for approval and setting up the service in the CMDB.
    • Service priority is used for adding the next layer of attributes to the CMDB for the service and ensuring the I&O department can set up systems monitoring.
    • This should be done early in the process in conjunction with the project manager and business sponsors.
    • It should be done as the project gets underway and the team can work on specifically where that milestone will be in each project.
    • What to include in the project description:
      • Name
      • Purpose
      • Publisher
      • Departments that will use the service
      • Service information
      • Regulatory constrains
    • What to include in the service priority information:
      • Main users
      • Number of users
      • Service requirements
      • System interdependencies
      • Criticality of the dependent systems
      • Service category
      • Service SME and support backup
      • System monitoring resources
      • Alert description and flow

    Document project description and service priority in the Project Handover Template.

    Embed service levels and maintenance information

    Include the service desk in discussions about project description, so it will be enabled to define service priority level.

    • Service level objectives (SLOs) will be added to CMDB to ensure the product is reviewed for business continuity and disaster recovery and that the service team knows what is coming.
    • This step will be good to start thinking about training agents and documenting knowledgebase (KB) articles.
    • What to include in SLO:
      • Response time
      • Resolution time
      • Escalation time
      • Business owner
      • Service owner
      • Vendor(s)
      • Vendor warranties
      • Data archiving/purging
      • Availability list
      • Business continuity/recovery objectives
      • Scheduled reports
      • Problem description
    • Maintenance and change requirements: You should add maintenance windows to the change calendar and ensure the maintenance checklist is added to KB articles and technician schedules.
    • What to include in maintenance and change requirements:
      • Scheduled events for the launch
      • Maintenance windows
      • Module release
      • Planned upgrades
      • Anticipated intervals for changes and trigger points
      • Scheduled batches

    Document service level objectives and maintenance in the Project Handover Template.

    Enhance communication between the project team and the service desk

    Communicating with the service desk early and often will ensure that agents fully get a deep knowledge of the new technology.

    Transition of a project to the service desk includes both knowledge transfer and execution transfer.

    01

    Provide training and mentoring to ensure technical knowledge is passed on.

    02

    Transfer leadership responsibilities by appointing the right people.

    03

    Transfer support by strategically assigning workers with the right technical and interpersonal skills.

    04

    Transfer admin rights to ensure technicians have access rights for troubleshooting.

    05

    Create support and a system to transfer work process. For example, using an online platform to store knowledge assets is a great way for support to access project information.

    Info-Tech Insight

    A communication plan and executive presentation will help project managers outline recommendations and communicate their benefits.

    Communicate reasons for projects and how they will be implemented

    Proactive communication of the project to affected stakeholders will help get their buy-in for the new technology and feedback for better support.

    Leaders of successful change spend considerable time developing a powerful change message, i.e. a compelling narrative that articulates the desired end state, that makes the change concrete and meaningful to staff.

    The message should:

    • Explain why the change or new application is needed.
    • Summarize what will stay the same.
    • Highlight what will be left behind.
    • Emphasize what is being changed due to the new or updated product.
    • Explain how the application will be implemented.
    • Address how this will affect various roles in the organization.
    • Discuss the staff’s role in making the project successful.
    • Communicate the supporting roles in the early implementation stages and later on.

    Five elements of communicating change

    Implement knowledge transfer to the service desk to ensure tickets won’t be unnecessarily escalated

    The support team usually uses an ITSM solution, while the project team mostly uses a project management solution. End users’ support is done and documented in the ITSM tool.

    Even terminologies used by these teams are different. For instance, service desk’s “incident” is equivalent to a project manager’s “defect.” Without proper integration of the development and support processes, the contents get siloed and outdated over time.

    Potential ways to deal with this challenge:

    Use the same platform for both project and service support

    This helps you document information in a single platform and provides better visibility of the project status to the support team as well. It also helps project team find out change-related incidents for a faster rollback.

    Note: This is not always feasible because of the high costs incurred in purchasing a new application with both ITSM and PM capabilities and the long time it takes for implementing such a solution.

    Integrate the PM and ITSM tools to improve transition efficiency

    Note: Consider the processes that should be integrated. Don’t integrate unnecessary steps in the development stage, such as design, which will not be helpful for support transition.

    Build a training plan for the new service

    When a new system is introduced or significant changes are applied, describe the steps and timeline for training.

    Training the service desk has two-fold benefits:
    Improve support:
    • Support team gets involved in user acceptance testing, which will provide feedback on potential bugs or failures in the technology.
    • Collaboration between specialists and tier 1 technicians will allow the service desk to gather information for handling potential incidents on the application.
    Shift-left enablement:
    • At the specialist level, agents will be more focused on other projects and spend less time on application issues, as they are mostly handled by the service desk.
    • As you shift service support left:
      • Cost per ticket decreases as more of the less costly resources are doing the work.
      • Average time to resolve decreases as the ticket is handled by the service desk.
      • End-user satisfaction increases as they don’t need to wait long for resolution.

    Who resolves the incident

    For more information about shift-left enablement, refer to InfoTech’s blueprint Optimize the Service Desk With a Shift-Left Strategy.

    Integrate knowledge management in the transition plan

    Build a knowledge transfer process to streamline service support for the newly developed technology.

    Use the following steps to ensure the service desk gets trained on the new project.

    1. Identify learning opportunities.
    2. Prioritize the identified opportunities based on:
    • Risk of lost knowledge
    • Impact of knowledge on support improvement
  • Define ways to transfer knowledge from the project team to the service desk. These could be:
    • One-on-one meetings
    • Mentoring sessions
    • Knowledgebase articles
    • Product road test
    • Potential incident management shadowing
  • Capture and transfer knowledge (via the identified means).
  • Support the service desk with further training if the requirement arises.
  • Info-Tech Insight

    Allocate knowledge transfer within ticket handling workflows. When incident is resolved by a specialist, they will assess if it is a good candidate for technician training and/or a knowledgebase article. If so, the knowledge manager will be notified of the opportunity to assign it to a SME for training and documentation of an article.

    For more information about knowledge transfer, refer to phase 3 of Info-Tech’s blueprint Standardize the Service Desk.

    Focus on the big picture first

    Identify training functions and plan for a formal knowledge transfer

    1. Brainstorm training functions for each group.
    2. Determine the timeline needed to conduct training for the identified training topics.
    RoleTraining FunctionTimeline

    Developer/Technical Support

    • Coach the service desk on the new application
    • Document relevant KB articles
    Business Analysts
    • Conduct informational interviews for new business requirements

    Service Desk Agents

    • Conduct informational interviews
    • Shadow incident management procedures
    • Document lessons learned
    Vendor
    • Provide cross-training to support team

    Document your knowledge transfer plan in the Project Handover Template.

    Build a checklist of the transition action items

    At this stage, the project is ready to go live and support needs to be independently done by the service desk.

    Checklist of the transition action items

    Info-Tech Insight

    No matter how well training is done, specialists may need to work on critical incidents and handle emergency changes. With effective service support and transition planning, you can make an agreement between the incident manager, change manager, and project manager on a timeline to balance critical incident or emergency change management and project management and define your SLA.

    Activity: Prepare a checklist of initiatives before support transition

    2-3 hours

    Document project support information and check off each support transition initiative as you shift service support to the service desk.

    1. As a group, review the Project Handover Template that you filled out in the previous steps.
    2. Download the Service Support Transitioning Checklist, and review the items that need to be done throughout the development, testing, and deployment steps of your project.
    3. Brainstorm at what step service desk needs to be involved.
    4. As you go through each initiative and complete it, check it off to make sure you are following the agreed document for a smooth transition of service support.
    Input Output
    • Project information
    • Support information for developed application/service
    • List of transitioning initiatives
    MaterialsParticipants
    • Project Handover Template
    • Service Support Transitioning Checklist
    • Project Team
    • Service Desk Manager
    • IT Lead

    Download the Project Handover Template

    Download the Service Support Transitioning Checklist

    Define metrics to track the success of project transition

    Consider key metrics to speak the language of targeted end users.

    You won’t know if transitioning support processes are successful unless you measure their impact. Find out your objectives for project transition and then track metrics that will allow you to fulfill these goals.

    Determine critical success factors to help you find out key metrics:

    High quality of the service

    Effectiveness of communication of the transition

    Manage risk of failure to help find out activities that will mitigate risk of service disruption

    Smooth and timely transition of support to the service desk

    Efficient utilization of the shared services and resources to mitigate conflicts and streamline service transitioning

    Suggested metrics:

    • Time to fulfill requests and resolve incidents for the new project
    • Time spent training the service desk
    • Number of knowledgebase articles created by the project team
    • Percentage of articles used by the service desk that prevented ticket escalation
    • First-level resolution
    • Ratio of escalated tickets for the new project
    • Problem ticket volume for the new project
    • Average customer satisfaction with the new project support
    • SLA breach rate

    Summary of Accomplishment

    Problem Solved

    Following the steps outlined in this research has helped you build a strategy to shift service support from the project team to the service desk, resulting in an improvement in customer service and agent satisfaction.

    You have also developed a plan to break the silo between the service desk and specialists and enable knowledge transfer so the service desk will not need to unnecessarily escalate tickets to developers. In the meantime, specialists are also responsible for service desk training on the new application.

    Efficient communication of service levels has helped the project team set clear expectations for managers to create a balance between their projects and service support.

    If you would like additional support, have our analysts guide you through other phases as part of an Info-Tech workshop.

    Contact your account representative for more information

    workshops@infotech.com

    1-888-670-8889

    Related Info-Tech Research

    Standardize the Service Desk

    Improve customer service by driving consistency in your support approach and meeting SLAs.

    Optimize the Service Desk With a Shift-Left Strategy

    The best type of service desk ticket is the one that doesn’t exist.

    Tailor IT Project Management Processes to Fit Your Projects

    Right-size PMBOK for all of your IT projects.

    Works Cited

    Brown, Josh. “Knowledge Transfer: What it is & How to Use it Effectively.” Helpjuice, 2021. Accessed November 2022.

    Magowan, Kirstie. “Top ITSM Metrics & KPIs: Measuring for Success, Aiming for Improvement.” BMC Blogs, 2020. Accessed November 2022.

    “The Complete Blueprint for Aligning Your Service Desk and Development Teams (Process Integration and Best Practices).” Exalate, 2021. Accessed October 2022.

    “The Qualities of Leadership: Leading Change.” Cornelius & Associates, 2010. Web.

    Cut Cost Through Effective IT Category Planning

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}213|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Vendor Management
    • Parent Category Link: /vendor-management
    • IT departments typically approach sourcing a new vendor or negotiating a contract renewal as an ad hoc event.
    • There is a lack of understanding on how category planning governance can save money.
    • IT vendor “go to market” or sourcing activities are typically not planned and are a reaction to internal client demands or vendor contract expiration.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Lack of knowledge of the benefits and features of category management, including the perception that the sourcing process takes too long, are two of the most common challenges that prevent IT from category planning.
    • Other challenges include the traditional view of contract renegotiation and vendor acquisition as a transactional event vs. an ongoing strategic process.
    • Finally, allocating resources and time to collect the data, vendor information, and marketing analysis prevents us from creating category plans.

    Impact and Result

    • An IT category plan establishes a consistent and proactive methodology or process to sourcing activities such as request for information (RFI), request for proposals, (RFPs), and direct negotiations with a specific vendor or“targeted negotiations” such as renewals.
    • The goal of an IT category plan is to leverage a strategic approach to vendor selection while identify cost optimizing opportunities that are aligned with IT strategy and budget objectives.

    Cut Cost Through Effective IT Category Planning Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should create an IT category plan to reduce your IT cost, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Create an IT category plan

    Use our three-step approach of Organize, Design, and Execute an IT Category Plan to get the most out of your IT budget while proactively planning your vendor negotiations.

    • IT Category Plan
    • IT Category Plan Metrics
    • IT Category Plan Review Presentation
    [infographic]

    Make the Case for Enterprise Business Analysis

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}509|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Requirements & Design
    • Parent Category Link: /requirements-and-design
    • It can be difficult to secure alignment between the many lines of business, IT included, in your organization.
    • Historically, we have drawn a dividing line between IT and "the business.”
    • The reality of organizational politics and stakeholder bias means that, with selection and prioritization, sometimes the highest value option is dismissed to make way for the loudest voice’s option.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Enterprise business analysis can help you stop the debate between IT and “the business,” as it sees everyone as part of the business. It can effectively break down silos, support the development of holistic strategies to address internal and external risks, and remove the bias and politics in decision making all too common in organizations.
    • The business analyst is the only role that can connect the strategic with the tactical, the systems, and the operations and do so objectively. It is the one source to show how people, process, and technology connect and relate, and the most skilled can remove bias and politics from their lens of view.
    • Maturity can’t be rushed. Build your enterprise business analysis program on a solid foundation of leading and consistent business analysis practices to secure buy-in and have a program that is sustainable in the long term.

    Impact and Result

    Let’s make the case for enterprise business analysis!

    • Organizations that have higher business analysis maturity and deploy enterprise analysis deliver better quality outcomes, with higher value, lower cost, and higher user satisfaction.
    • Business analysts should be contributing at the strategic level, as they need to understand multiple horizons simultaneously and be able to zoom in and out as the context calls for it. Business analysts aren’t only for projects.

    Make the Case for Enterprise Business Analysis Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Make the Case for Enterprise Business Analysis Storyboard – Take your business analysis from tactics to strategy.

    • Make the Case for Enterprise Business Analysis Storyboard

    2. Communicate the Case for Enterprise Business Analysis Template – Make the case for enterprise business analysis.

    • Communicate the Case for Enterprise Business Analysis
    [infographic]

    Further reading

    Make the Case for Enterprise Business Analysis

    Putting the strategic and tactical puzzle together.

    Analyst Perspective

    We commonly recognize the value of effective business analysis at a project or tactical level. A good business analysis professional can support the business by identifying its needs and recommending solutions to address them.
    Now, wouldn't it be great if we could do the same thing at a higher level?
    Enterprise (or strategic) business analysis is all about seeing that bigger picture, an approach that makes any business analysis professional a highly valuable contributor to their organization. It focuses on the enterprise, not a specific project or line of business.
    Leading the business analysis effort at an enterprise level ensures that your business is not only doing things right, but also doing the right things; aligned with the strategic vision of your organization to improve the way decisions are made, options are analyzed, and successful results are realized.

    Vincent Mirabelli

    Vincent Mirabelli
    Principal Research Director, Applications Delivery and Management
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    • Difficulty properly aligning between the many lines of business in your organization.
    • Historically, we have drawn a dividing line between IT and the business.
    • The reality of organizational politics and stakeholder bias means that, with selection and prioritization, sometimes the highest value option is dismissed in favor of the loudest voice.

    Common Obstacles

    • Difficulty aligning an ever-changing backlog of projects, products, and services while simultaneously managing risks, external threats, and stakeholder expectations.
    • Many organizations have never heard of enterprise business analysis and only see the importance of business analysts at the project and delivery level.
    • Business analysis professionals rarely do enough to advocate for a seat at the strategic tables in their organizations.

    Info-Tech's Approach

    Let's make the case for enterprise business analysis!

    • Organizations that have higher business analysis maturity and deploy enterprise business analysis deliver better quality outcomes with higher value, lower cost, and higher user satisfaction.
    • Business analysts aren't only for projects. They should contribute at the strategic level, since they need to understand multiple horizons simultaneously and be able to zoom in and out as the context requires.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Enterprise business analysis can help you reframe the debate between IT and the business, since it sees everyone as part of the business. It can effectively break down silos, support the development of holistic strategies to address internal and external risks, and remove bias and politics from decision making.

    Phase 1

    Build the case for enterprise business analysis

    Phase 1

    Phase 2

    1.1 Define enterprise business analysis

    1.2 Identify your pains and opportunities

    2.1 Set your vision

    2.2 Define your roadmap and next steps

    2.3 Complete your executive communications deck

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • 1.1.1 Discuss how business analysis is used in our organization
    • 1.1.2 Discuss your disconnects between strategy and tactics
    • 1.2.1 Identify your pains and opportunities

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • Business analyst(s)
    • Organizational business leaders
    • Any other relevant stakeholders

    How business analysis supports our success today

    Delivering value at the tactical level

    Effective business analysis helps guide an organization through improvements to processes, products, and services. Business analysts "straddle the line between IT and the business to help bridge the gap and improve efficiency" in an organization (CIO, 2019).
    They are most heavily involved in:

    • Defining needs
    • Modeling concepts, processes, and solutions
    • Conducting analysis
    • Maintaining and managing requirements
    • Managing stakeholders
    • Monitoring progress
    • Doing business analysis planning
    • Conducting elicitation

    In a survey, business analysts indicated that of their total working time, they spend 31% performing business analysis planning and 41% performing elicitation and analysis (PMI, 2017).

    By including a business analyst in a project, organizations benefit by:
    (IAG, 2009)

    87%

    Reduced time overspending

    75%

    Prevented budget overspending

    78%

    Reduction in missed functionality

    1.1.1 Discuss how business analysis is used in your organization

    15-30 minutes

    1. Gather the appropriate stakeholders to discuss their knowledge, experience, and perspectives on business analysis. This should relate to their experience and not a future or aspirational usage.
    2. Have a team member facilitate the session.
    3. Brainstorm and document all shared thoughts and perspectives.
    4. Synthesize those thoughts and perspectives and record the results for the group to review and discuss.
    5. Transfer the results to the Communicate the Case for Enterprise Business Analysis template

    Input

    • Stakeholder knowledge and experience

    Output

    • A shared understanding of how your organization leverages its business analysis function

    Materials

    • Whiteboard/Flip charts
    • Collaborative whiteboard
    • Communicate the Case for Enterprise Business Analysis template

    Participants

    • Business analyst(s)
    • Organizational business leaders
    • Any other relevant stakeholders

    Download the Communicate the Case for Enterprise Business Analysis template

    Executives and leadership are satisfied with IT when there is alignment between tactics and goals

    Info-Tech's CIO Business Vision Survey data highlights the importance of IT projects in supporting the business to achieve its strategic goals.

    However, Info-Tech's CEO-CIO Alignment Survey (N=124) data indicates that CEOs perceive IT as poorly aligned with the business' strategic goals.

    Info-Tech's CIO-CEO Alignment Diagnostics

    43%

    of CEOs believe that business goals are going unsupported by IT.

    60%

    of CEOs believe that IT must improve understanding of business goals.

    80%

    of CIOs/CEOs are misaligned on the target role of IT.

    30%

    of business stakeholders support their IT departments.

    Addressing problems solely with tactics does not always have the desired effect

    94%

    Source: "Out of the Crisis", Deming (via Harvard Business Review)

    According to famed management and quality thought leader and pioneer W. Edwards Deming, 94% of issues in the workplace are systemic cause significant organizational pain.

    Yet we continue to address them on the surface, rather than acknowledge how ingrained they are in our culture, systems, and processes.

    For example, we:

    • Create workarounds to address process and solution constraints
    • Expect that poor (or lack of ) leadership can be addressed in a course or seminar
    • Expect that "going Agile" will resolve our problems, and that decision making, governance, and organizational alignment will happen organically.

    Band-aid solutions rarely have the desired effect, particularly in the long-term.

    Our solutions should likewise focus on the systemic/macro environment. We can do this via projects, products and services, but those don't always address the larger issues.

    If we take the work our business analysis currently does in defining needs and solutions, and elevate this to the strategic level, the results can be impactful.

    Many organizations would benefit from enhancing their business analysis maturity

    The often-overlooked strategic value of the role comes with maturing your practices.

    Only 18% of organizations have mature (optimized or established) business analysis practices.

    With that higher level of maturity comes increased levels of capability, efficiency, and effectiveness in delivering value to people, processes, and technology. Through such efforts, they're better equipped and able to connect the strategy of their organization to the projects, processes, and products they deliver.

    They shift focus from "figuring business analysis out" to truly unleashing its potential, with business analysts contributing in strategic and tactical ways.

    an image showing the following data: Optimized- 5; Established- 13; Improving- 37; Starting- 25; Ad hoc- 21

    (Adapted from PMI, 2017)

    Info-Tech Insight

    Business analysts are best suited to connect the strategic with the tactical, the systems, and the operations. They maintain the most objective lens regarding how people, process, and technology connect and relate, and the most skilled of them can remove bias and politics from their perspective.

    1.1.2 Discuss your disconnects between strategy and tactics

    30-60 minutes

      1. Gather the appropriate stakeholders to discuss their knowledge, experience, and perspectives regarding failures that resulted from disconnects between strategy and tactics.
      2. Have a team member facilitate the session.
      3. Brainstorm and document all shared thoughts and perspectives.
      4. Synthesize those thoughts and perspectives and record the results.
      5. Transfer the results to the Communicate the Case for Enterprise Business Analysis template.

    Input

    • Stakeholder knowledge and experience

    Output

    • A shared understanding and list of failures due to disconnects between strategy and tactics

    Materials

    • Whiteboard/Flip charts
    • Collaborative whiteboard
    • Communicate the Case for Enterprise Business Analysis template

    Participants

    • Business analyst(s)
    • Organizational business leaders
    • Any other relevant stakeholders

    Download the Communicate the Case for Enterprise Business Analysis template

    Defining enterprise business analysis

    Terms may change, but the function remains the same.

    Enterprise business analysis (sometimes referred to as strategy analysis) "…focuses on defining the future and transition states needed to address the business need, and the work required is defined both by that need and the scope of the solution space. It covers strategic thinking in business analysis, as well as the discovery or imagining of possible solutions that will enable the enterprise to create greater value for stakeholders and/or capture more value for itself."
    (Source: "Business Analysis Body of Knowledge," v3)

    Define the function of enterprise business analysis

    This is a competitive advantage for mature organizations.

    Organizations with high-performing business analysis programs experience an enhanced alignment between strategy and operations. This contributes to improved organizational performance. We see this in financial (69% vs. 45%) and strategic performance (66% vs. 21%), also organizational agility (40% vs. 14%) and management of operational projects (62% vs. 29%). (PMI, 2017)

    When comparing enterprise with traditional business analysis, we see stark differences in the size and scope of their view, where they operate, and the role they play in organizational decision making.

    Enterprise Traditional
    Decision making Guides and influences Executes
    Time horizon 2-10 years 0-2 years
    Focus Strategy, connecting the strategic to the operational Operational, optimizing how business is done, and keeping the lights on
    Domain

    Whole organization

    Broader marketplace

    Only stakeholder lines of business relevant to the current project, product or service
    Organizational Level Executive/Leadership Project

    (Adapted from Schulich School of Business)

    Info-Tech Insight

    Maturity can't be rushed. Build your enterprise business analysis program on a solid foundation of leading and consistent business analysis practices to secure buy-in and have a program that is sustainable in the long term.

    An image showing the percentages of high- and low- maturity organizations, for the following categories: Financial performance; Strategy implementation; Organizational agility; Management of projects.

    (Adapted from PMI, 2017)

    How enterprise business analysis is used to improve organizations

    The biggest sources of project failure include:

    • Wrong (or poor) requirements
    • Unrealistic (or incomplete) business case
    • Lack of appropriate governance and oversight
    • Poor implementation
    • Poor benefits management
    • Environmental changes

    Source: MindTools.com, 2023.

    Enterprise business analysis addresses these sources and more.

    It brings a holistic view of the organization, improving collaboration and decision making across the many lines of business, effectively breaking down silos.

    In addition to ensuring we're doing the right things, not just doing things right in the form of improved requirements and more accurate business cases, or ensuring return on investment (ROI) and monitoring the broader landscape, enterprise business analysis also supports:

    • Reduced rework and waste
    • Understanding and improving operations
    • Making well-informed decisions through improved objectivity/reduced bias
    • Identifying new opportunities for growth and expansion
    • Identifying and mitigating risk
    • Eliminating projects and initiatives that do not support organizational goals or objectives
    • A career-pathing option for business analysts

    Identify your pains and opportunities

    There are many considerations in enterprise business analysis.

    Pains, gains, threats, and opportunities can come at your organization from anywhere. Be it a new product launch, an international expansion, or a new competitor, it can be challenging to keep up.

    This is where an enterprise business analyst can be the most helpful.

    By keeping a pulse on the external and internal environments, they can support growth, manage risks, and view your organization through multiple lenses and perspectives to get a single, complete picture.

    External

    Internal

    Identifying competitive forces

    In the global environment

    Organizational strengths and weaknesses

    • Monitoring and maintaining your competitive advantage.
    • Understanding trends, risks and threats in your business domain, and how they affect your organization.
    • Benchmarking performance against like and unlike organizations, to realize where you stand and set a baseline for continuous improvement and business development.
    • Leveraging tools and techniques to scan the broader landscape on an ongoing basis. Using PESTLE analysis, they can monitor the political, economic, social, technological, legal, and environmental factors that impact when, where, how, and with who you conduct your business and IT operations.
    • Supporting alignment between a portfolio or program of projects and initiatives.
    • Improving alignment between the various lines of business, who often lack full visibility outside of their silo, and can find themselves clashing over time, resources, and attention from leaders.
    • Improving solutions and outcomes through objective option selection.

    1.2.1 Identify your pains and opportunities

    30-60 minutes

    1. As a group, generate a list of the current pains and opportunities facing your organization. You can focus on a particular type (competitive, market, or internal) or leave it open. You can also focus on pains or opportunities separately, or simultaneously.
    2. Have a team member facilitate the session.
    3. Record the results for the group to review, discuss, and prioritize.
      1. Discuss the impact and likelihood of each item. This can be formally ranked and quantified if there is data to support the item or leveraging the wisdom of the group.
      2. Prioritize the top three to five items of each type, as agreed by the group, and document the results.
    4. Transfer the results to the Communicate the Case for Enterprise Business Analysis template.

    Download the Communicate the Case for Enterprise Business Analysis template

    Input

    • Attendee knowledge
    • Supporting data, if available

    Output

    • A list of identified organizational pains and opportunities that has been prioritized by the group

    Materials

    • Whiteboard/Flip charts
    • Collaborative whiteboard
    • Communicate the Case for Enterprise Business Analysis template

    Participants

    • Business analyst(s)
    • Organizational business leaders
    • Any other relevant stakeholders

    Phase 2

    Prepare the foundations for your enterprise business analysis program

    Phase 1

    Phase 2

    1.1 Define enterprise business analysis

    1.2 Identify your pains and opportunities

    2.1 Set your vision

    2.2 Define your roadmap and next steps

    2.3 Complete your executive communications deck

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • 2.1.1 Define your vision and goals
    • 2.1.2 Identify your enterprise business analysis inventory
    • 2.2.1 Now, Next, Later

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • Business analyst(s)
    • Organizational business leaders
    • Any other relevant stakeholders

    Set your vision

    Your vision becomes your "north star," guiding your journey and decisions.

    When thinking about a vision statement for enterprise business analysis, think about:

    • Who are we doing this for? Who will benefit?
    • What do our business partners need? What do our customers need?
    • What value do we provide them? How can we best support them?
    • Why is this special/different from how we usually do business?

    Always remember: Your goal is not your vision!

    Not knowing the difference will prevent you from both dreaming big and achieving your dream.

    Your vision represents where you want to go. It's what you want to do.

    Your goals represent how you want to achieve your vision.

    • They are a key element of operationalizing your vision.
    • Your strategy, initiatives, and features will align with one or more goals.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Your vision shouldn't be so far out that it doesn't feel real, nor so short term that it gets bogged down in details. Finding balance will take some trial and error and will be different depending on your organization.

    2.1.1 Define your vision and goals

    1-2 hours

    1. Gather the appropriate stakeholders to discuss their vision for enterprise business analysis. It should address the questions used in framing your vision statement.
    2. Have a team member facilitate the session.
    3. Review your current organizational vision and goals.
    4. Discuss and document all shared thoughts and perspectives on how enterprise business analysis can align with the organizational vision.
    5. Synthesize those thoughts and perspectives to create a vision statement.
    6. Transfer the results to the Communicate the Case for Enterprise Business Analysis template.

    Download the Communicate the Case for Enterprise Business Analysis template

    Input

    • Stakeholder vision, knowledge, and experience
    • Current organizational vision and goals

    Output

    • A documented vision and goals for your enterprise business analysis program

    Materials

    • Whiteboard/Flip charts
    • Collaborative whiteboard
    • Communicate the Case for Enterprise Business Analysis template

    Participants

    • Business analyst(s)
    • Organizational business leaders
    • Any other relevant stakeholders

    Components of successful enterprise business analysis programs

    Ensure you're off to the best start by examining where you are and where you want to go.

    Training

    • Do the current team members have the right level of training?
    • Can we easily obtain training to close any gaps?

    Competencies and capabilities

    • Do our business analysts have the right skills, attributes, and behaviors to be successful?

    Structure and alignment

    • Would the organizational culture support enterprise business analysis (EBA)?
    • How might we structure the EBA unit to maximize effectiveness?
    • How can we best support the organization's goals and objectives?

    Methods and processes

    • How do we plan on managing the work to be done?
    • Can we define our processes and workflows?

    Tools, techniques, and templates

    • Do we have the most effective tools, techniques, and templates?

    Governance

    • How will we make decisions?
    • How will the program be managed?

    2.1.2 Identify your enterprise business analysis inventory

    30-60 minutes

    1. Gather the appropriate stakeholders to discuss the current business analysis assets, which could be leveraged for enterprise business analysis. This includes people, processes, and technologies which cover skills, knowledge, resources, experience, knowledge, and competencies. Focus on what the organization currently has, and not what it needs.
    2. Have a team member facilitate the session.
    3. Record the results for the group to review and discuss.
    4. Transfer the results to the Communicate the Case for Enterprise Business Analysis template.

    Download the Communicate the Case for Enterprise Business Analysis template

    Input

    • Your current business analysis assets and resources Stakeholder knowledge and experience

    Output

    • A list of assets and resources to enable enterprise business analysis

    Materials

    • Whiteboard/Flip charts
    • Collaborative whiteboard
    • Communicate the Case for Enterprise Business Analysis template

    Participants

    • Business analyst(s)
    • Organizational business leaders
    • Any other relevant stakeholders

    Define your roadmap and next steps

    What do we have? What do we need?

    From completing the enterprise business analysis inventory, you will have a comprehensive list of all available assets.

    The next question is, how can this be leveraged to start building for the future?

    To operationalize enterprise business analysis, consider:

    • What do we still need to do?
    • How important are the identified gaps? Can we still operate?
    • What decisions do we need to make?
    • What stakeholders do we need to involve? Have we engaged them all?

    Lay out your roadmap

    Taking steps to mature your enterprise business analysis practice.

    The Now, Next, Later technique is a method for prioritizing and planning improvements or tasks. This involves breaking down a list of tasks or improvements into three categories:

    • Now tasks are those that must be completed immediately. These tasks are usually urgent or critical, and they must be completed to keep the project or organization running smoothly.
    • Next tasks are those that should be completed soon. These tasks are not as critical as Now tasks, but they are still important and should be tackled relatively soon.
    • Later tasks are those that can be completed later. These tasks are less critical and can be deferred without causing major problems.

    By using this technique, you can prioritize and plan the most important tasks, while allowing the flexibility to adjust as necessary.

    This technique also helps clarify what must be done first vs. what can wait. This prioritizes the most important things while keeping track of what must be done next, maintaining a smooth development/improvement process.

    An image of the now - next - later roadmap technique.

    2.2.1 Now, Next, Later

    1-2 hours

    1. Use the list of items created in 2.1.2 (Identify your enterprise business analysis inventory). Add any you feel are missing during this exercise.
    2. Have a team member facilitate the session.
    3. In the Communicate the Case for Enterprise Business Analysis template, categorize these items according to Now, Next and Later, where:
      1. Now = Critically important items that may require little effort to complete. These must be done within the next six months.
      2. Next = Important items that may require more effort or depend on other factors. These must be done in six to twelve months.
      3. Later = Less important items that may require significant effort to complete. These must be done at some point within twelve months.

    Ultimately, the choice of priority and timing is yours. Recognize that items may change categories as new information arises.

    Download the Communicate the Case for Enterprise Business Analysis template

    Input

    • Your enterprise business analysis inventory and gaps
    • Stakeholder knowledge and experience

    Output

    • A prioritized list of items to enable enterprise business analysis

    Materials

    • Whiteboard/Flip charts
    • Collaborative whiteboard
    • Communicate the Case for Enterprise Business Analysis template

    Participants

    • Business analyst(s)
    • Organizational business leaders
    • Any other relevant stakeholders

    2.3 Complete your executive communication deck

    Use the results of your completed exercises to build your executive communication slide deck, to make the case for enterprise business analysis

    Slide Header Associated Exercise Rationale
    Pains and opportunities

    1.1.2 Discuss your disconnects between strategy and tactics

    1.2.1 Identify your pains and opportunities

    This helps build the case for enterprise business analysis (EBA), leveraging the existing pains felt in the organization. This will draw the connection for your stakeholders.
    Our vision and goals 2.1.1 Define your vision and goals Defines where you want to go and what effort will be required.
    What is enterprise business analysis

    1.1.1 How is BA being used in our organization today?
    Pre-populated supporting content

    Defines the discipline of EBA and how it can support and mature your organization.
    Expected benefits Pre-populated supporting content What's in it for us? This section helps answer that question. What benefits can we expect, and is this worth the investment of time and effort?
    Making this a reality 2.1.2 Identify your EBA inventory Identifies what the organization presently has that makes the effort easier. It doesn't feel as daunting if there are existing people, processes, and technologies in place and in use today.
    Next steps 2.2.1 Now, Next, Later A prioritized list of action items. This will demonstrate the work involved, but broken down over time, into smaller, more manageable pieces.

    Track metrics

    Track metrics throughout the project to keep stakeholders informed.

    As the project nears completion:

    1. You will have better-aligned and more satisfied stakeholders.
    2. You will see fewer projects and initiatives that don't align with the organizational goals and objectives.
    3. There will be a reduction in costs attributed to misaligned projects and initiatives (as mentioned in #2) and the opportunity to allocate valuable time and resources to other, higher-value work.
    Metric Description Target Improvement/Reduction
    Improved stakeholder satisfaction Lines of business and previously siloed departments/divisions will be more satisfied with time spent on solution involvement and outcomes. 10% year 1, 20% year 2
    Reduction in misaligned/non-priority project work Reduction in projects, products, and services with no clear alignment to organizational goals. With that, resource costs can be allocated to other, higher-value solutions. 10% year 1, 25% year 2
    Improved delivery agility/lead time With improved alignment comes reduced conflict and political infighting. As a result, the velocity of solution delivery will increase. 10%

    Bibliography

    Bossert, Oliver and Björn Münstermann. "Business's 'It's not my problem' IT problem." McKinsey Digital. 30 March, 2023.
    Brule, Glenn R. "The Lay of the Land: Enterprise Analysis." Modern Analyst.
    "Business Analysis: Leading Organizations to Better Outcomes." Project Management Institute (PMI), 2017
    Corporate Finance Institute. "Strategic Analysis." Updated 14 March 2023
    IAG Consulting. Business Analysis Benchmark Report, 2009.
    International Institute of Business Analysis. "A Guide to the Business Analysis Body of Knowledge" (BABOK Guide) version 3.
    Mirabelli, Vincent. "Business Analysis Foundations: Enterprise" LinkedIn Learning, February 2022.
    - - "Essential Techniques in Enterprise Analysis" LinkedIn Learning, September 2022.
    - - "The Essentials of Enterprise Analysis" Love the Process Academy. May 2020.
    - - "The Value of Enterprise Analysis." VincentMirabelli.com
    Praslova, Ludmila N. "Today's Most Critical Workplace Challenges Are About Systems." Harvard Business Review. 10 January 2023.
    Pratt, Mary K. and Sarah K. White. "What is a business analyst? A key role for business-IT efficiency." CIO. 17 April, 2019.
    Project Management Institute. "Business Analysis: Leading Organizations to Better Outcomes." October 2017.
    Sali, Sema. "The Importance of Strategic Business Analysis in Successful Project Outcomes." International Institute of Business Analysis. 26 May 2022.
    - - "What Does Enterprise Analysis Look Like? Objectives and Key Results." International Institute of Business Analysis. 02 June 2022.
    Shaker, Kareem. "Why do projects really fail?" Project Management Institute, PM Network. July 2010.
    "Strategic Analysis: Definition, Types and Benefits" Voxco. 25 February 2022.
    "The Difference Between Enterprise Analysis and Business Analysis." Schulich School of Business, Executive Education Center. 24 September 2018 (Updated June 2022)
    "Why Do Projects Fail: Learning How to Avoid Project Failure." MindTools.com. Accessed 24 April 2023.

    The latest burning platform: Exit Plans in a shifting world

    • Large vertical image:
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A

    The current global situation, marked by significant trade tensions and retaliatory measures between major economic powers, has elevated the importance of more detailed, robust, and executable exit plans for businesses in nearly all industries. The current geopolitical headwinds create an unpredictable environment that can severely impact supply chains, technology partnerships, and overall business operations. What was once a prudent measure is now a critical necessity – a “burning platform” – for ensuring business continuity and resilience.

    Here I will delve deeper into the essential components of an effective exit plan, outline the practical steps for its implementation, and explain the crucial role of testing in validating its readiness.

    exit plan

    Continue reading

    Select an Enterprise Application

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}588|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 10.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $10,000 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 10 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Enterprise Applications
    • Parent Category Link: /enterprise-applications
    • Organizations rarely have both the sufficient knowledge and resources to properly evaluate, select, and implement an enterprise application software (EAS), forcing them to turn to external partnerships.
    • Inadequate and incomplete requirements skew the EAS selection in one direction or another. Many EAS projects fail due to a lack of clear description and specification of functional requirements.
    • The EAS technology market is so vast that it becomes nearly impossible to know where to start or how to differentiate between vendors and products.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Accountability for EAS success is shared between IT and the business. There is no single owner of an EAS. A unified approach to building your strategy promotes an integrated roadmap so all stakeholders have clear direction on the future state.
    • While technology is the key enabler of building strong customer experiences, there are many other drivers of dissatisfaction. IT must stand shoulder-to-shoulder with the business to develop a technology framework for enterprise applications.
    • EAS projects are more successful when the management team understands the strategic importance and the criticality of alignment. Time needs to be spent upfront aligning business strategies with EAS capabilities. Effective alignment between IT and the business should happen daily. Alignment doesn’t just occur at the executive level but at each level of the organization.

    Impact and Result

    • Conduct an EAS project preparedness assessment as a means to ensure you maximize the value of your time, effort, and spending.
    • Gather the necessary resources to form the team to conduct the EAS selection.
    • Gett the proper EAS requirement landscape by mapping out business capabilities and processes, translating into prioritized EAS requirements.
    • Review SoftwareReviews vendor reports to shortlist vendors for your RFP process.
    • Use Info-Tech’s templates and tools to gather your EAS requirements, build your RFP and evaluation scorecard, and build a foundational EAS selection framework.

    Select an Enterprise Application Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Select an Enterprise Application Software Storyboard - A blueprint which prepares you for a proper and better enterprise application selection outcome.

    Properly selecting and implementing an enterprise application requires a proper structure. This blueprint guides you with a framework to help in such project, including steps such as assessing readiness, plan for the right resources, requirements gathering, shortlisting, obtaining and evaluating vendor responses, and preparing for implementation.

    • Select an Enterprise Application Software Storyboard

    2. Select an Enterprise Application Readiness Assessment Checklist – a checklist to assess your readiness towards moving ahead with the selection process.

    The EAS Readiness Checklist includes a list of essential tasks to be completed prior to the enterprise application selection and implementation project.

    • EAS Readiness Assessment Checklist

    3. ERP/HRIS/CRM Requirements Templates – a set of templates to help build a list of requirements and features for the selection process.

    These templates are specific to either ERP, HRIS, or CRM. Each template lists out a set of modules and features allowing you to easily build your requirements.

    • ERP Requirements Template
    • HRIS Requirements Template
    • CRM Requirements Template

    4. Vendor Solicitation (RFP) to Evaluation Suite of Tools – Use Info-Tech’s RFP, vendor response and evaluation tools and templates to increase your efficiency in your RFP and evaluation process.

    Configure this time-saving suite of tools to your organizational culture, needs, and most importantly the desired outcome of your RFP initiative.

    • EAS Request for Proposal Template
    • EAS Vendor Response Template
    • ERP Vendor Demonstration Script Template
    • HRIS Vendor Demonstration Script Template
    • CRM Vendor Demonstration Script Template
    • EAS RFP and Demonstration Scoring Tool
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Select an Enterprise Application

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Workshop debrief – Prepare for implementation

    The Purpose

    Review evaluation framework.

    Prepare for implementation.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Activities

    1.1 Support the project team in establishing the evaluation framework.

    1.2 Discuss demo scripts scenarios.

    1.3 Discuss next steps and key items in preparation for the implementation.

    Outputs

    Evaluation framework considerations.

    Demo script considerations.

    RFP considerations.

    2 Workshop Preparation

    The Purpose

    The facilitator works with the team to verify organizational readiness for EAS project and form the EAS project team.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Level-set on organizational readiness for EAS

    Organizational project alignment

    Activities

    2.1 Introduce the workshop and complete an overview of activities.

    2.2 Complete organizational context assessment to level-set understanding.

    2.3 Complete EAS readiness assessment.

    2.4 Form EAS selection team.

    Outputs

    EAS readiness assessment

    Structured EAS selection team

    3 Mapping Capabilities to Prioritizing Requirements

    The Purpose

    Determine the business capabilities and process impacted by the EAS.

    Determine what the business needs to get out of the EAS solution.

    Build the selection roadmap and project plan.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Business and ERP solution alignment

    Activities

    3.1 Map business capabilities/processes.

    3.2 Inventory application and data flow.

    3.3 List EAS requirements.

    3.4 Prioritize EAS requirements.

    Outputs

    Business capability/process map

    List or map of application + data flow

    Prioritized EAS requirements

    4 Vendor Landscape and your RFP

    The Purpose

    Understand EAS market product offerings.

    Readying key RFP aspects and expected vendor responses.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Shortlist of vendors to elicit RFP response.

    Translated EAS requirements into RFP.

    Activities

    4.1 Build RFP.

    4.2 Build vendor response template.

    Outputs

    Draft of RFP template.

    Draft of vendor response template.

    5 How to Evaluate Vendors

    The Purpose

    Prepare for demonstration and evaluation.

    Establish evaluation criteria.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Narrow your options for ERP selection to best-fit vendors.

    Activities

    5.1 Run an RFP evaluation simulation.

    5.2 Establish evaluation criteria.

    5.3 Customize the RFP and Demonstration and Scoring Tool.

    Outputs

    Draft of demo script template.

    Draft of evaluation criteria.

    Draft of RFP and Demonstration and Scoring Tool.

    Further reading

    Select an Enterprise Application

    Selecting a best-fit solution requires balancing needs, cost, and vendor capability.

    Analyst Perspective

    A foundational EAS strategy is critical to decision-making.

    Enterprise application software (EAS) is a core tool that a business leverages to accomplish its goals. An EAS that is doing its job well is invisible to the business. The challenges come when the tool is no longer invisible. It has become a source of friction in the functioning of the business.

    EAS systems are expensive, their benefits are difficult to quantify, and they often suffer from poor user satisfaction. Post-implementation, technology evolves, organizational goals change, and the health of the system is not monitored. This is complicated in today’s digital landscape with multiple integration points, siloed data, and competing priorities.

    Too often organizations jump into selecting replacement systems without understanding the needs of the organization. Alignment between business and IT is just one part of the overall strategy. Identifying key pain points and opportunities, assessed in the light of organizational strategy, will provide a strong foundation to the transformation of the EAS system. Learning about different vendor product offerings with a rigorous approach and evaluation framework will pave way for a better selection outcome.

    Hong Kwok, Research Director

    Hong Kwok
    Research Director
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge Common Obstacles Info-Tech’s Approach
    Selecting and implementing an EAS is one of the most expensive and time-consuming technology transformations an organization can undertake. EAS projects are notorious for time and budget overruns, with only a margin of the anticipated benefits being realized. Making the wrong technology selection or failing to plan for an EAS implementation has significant – and possibly career-ending – implications.

    The EAS technology market is so vast that it is nearly impossible to know where to start or how to differentiate between vendors and products.

    Inadequate and incomplete requirements skew the EAS selection in one direction to another. Many EAS projects fail due to a lack of clear description and specification of functional requirements.

    Organizations rarely have both the sufficient knowledge and resources to properly evaluate, select, and implement an EAS, forcing them to turn to external partnerships.

    EAS selection must be driven by your organization’s overall strategy. Ensure you are ready to embark on this journey with the right resources.

    Determine what EAS solution fits your organization through a structured requirement gathering process to a vendor evaluation framework.

    Ensure strong points of integration between EAS and other software such as ERP to HRIS. No EAS should live in isolation.

    Info-Tech Insight
    Accountability for EAS success is shared between IT and the business. There is no single owner of an EAS. A unified approach to building your strategy promotes an integrated roadmap so all stakeholders have clear direction on the future state.

    You are not just picking a piece of software, you are choosing a long-term technology partner

    Reasons for Selectin Chosen Software

    Decision making in selection often stands on functional fit; don’t forget to consider vendor fit.

    As the ERP technology market becomes increasingly saturated and difficult to decode, vendors are trying to get ahead by focusing on building a partnership, not just making a sale.

    68 % of organizations are satisfied with the overall ERP vendor experience, up from 54% in 2017.

    Panorama Consulting Solutions, “Report,” 2018

    What is an Enterprise Application?

    Our Definition: Enterprise Application Software (EAS) is a large software system that provides a broad and integrated set of features which supports a range of business operations and processes across an organization. The system is broadly deployed, provides a unified interface and data structure, allowing for higher business productivity and reporting efficiencies. Best known EAS solutions include Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP), Human Resource Information System (HRIS), and Customer Relationship Management (CRM).

    More focused EAS solutions may also bring benefits to your organization, depending on the scale of operations, complexity of operations, and functions. Here are some examples:

    PSA: Professional Services Automation
    SCMS: Supply Chain Management System
    WMS: Warehouse Management System
    EAM: Enterprise Asset Management
    PIMS: Product Information Management System
    MES: Manufacturing Execution System
    MA: Marketing Automation

    Our other Selection Framework

    When selecting personal or commodity applications, or mid-tier applications with spend below $100,000, use our Rapid Application Selection Framework.

    Download this tool

    Enterprise Applications Lifecycle Advisory Services

    Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)

    Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)

    What is EPR

    Enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems facilitate the flow of information across business units. They allow for the seamless integration of systems and create a holistic view of the enterprise to support decision making.

    In many organizations, the ERP system is considered the lifeblood of the enterprise. Problems with this key operational system will have a dramatic impact on the ability of the enterprise to survive and grow.

    An ERP system:

    • Automates processes, reducing the amount of manual, routine work.
    • Integrates with core modules, eliminating the fragmentation of systems.
    • Centralizes information for reporting from multiple parts of the value chain to a single point.
    ERP use cases: Product-centric
    Suitable for organizations that manufacture, assemble, distribute, or manage material goods.
    Service-centric
    Suitable for organizations that provide and manage field services and/or professional services.

    Human Resource Information System (HRIS)

    What is HRIS?

    An HRIS is used to acquire, store, manipulate, analyze, retrieve, and distribute information regarding an organization’s human resources. HRIS covers the entire employee lifecycle from recruit to retire.

    An HRIS:

    • Retains employee data in a single repository.
    • Enhances employee engagement through self-service and visibility into their records.
    • Enhances data security through role-based access control.
    • Eliminates manual processes and enables workflow automation.
    • Reduces transaction processing time and HR administrative tasks.
    • Presents an end-to-end, comprehensive view of all HR processes.
    • Reduces exposure to risk with compliance to rules and regulations.
    • Enhances the business’s reporting capability on various aspects of human capital.

    Human Resource Information System

    Customer relationship management (CRM)

    What is CRM?

    A CRM platform (or suite) is a core enterprise application that provides a broad feature set for supporting customer interaction processes, typically across marketing, sales and customer service. These suites supplant more basic applications for customer interaction management (such as the contact management module of an ERP or office productivity suite).

    A CRM suite provides many key capabilities, including but not limited to:

    • Account management
    • Order history tracking
    • Pipeline management
    • Case management
    • Campaign management
    • Reports and analytics
    • Customer journey execution

    A CRM provides a host of native capabilities, but many organizations elect to tightly integrate their CRM solution with other parts of their customer experience ecosystem to provide a 360-degree view of their customers.

    Customer relationship management

    The good EAS numbers

    There are many good reasons to support EAS implementation and use.

    92% of organizations report that CRM use is important for accomplishing revenue objectives.
    Source: Validity, 2020

    Almost 26% of companies implement HRIS is to obtain greater functionalities, while other main reasons are to increase efficiencies, support growth, and consolidate systems.
    Source: SoftwarePath, 2022

    Functionality of an ERP is believed to be the most important aspect by almost 40% of companies.
    Source: SelectHub, 2022

    The ugly EAS numbers

    Risks are high in EAS projects.

    Statistical analysis of ERP projects indicates rates of failure vary from 50 to 70 percent. Taking the low end of those analyst reports, one in two ERP projects is considered a failure.
    Source: Electric Journal of Information Systems Evaluation.

    46% of HR technology projects exceed their planned timelines.
    Source: Unleash, 2020

    Almost 70% of all CRM implementation projects do not meet expected objectives.
    Source: Future Computing and Informatics Journal

    Enterprise Application dissatisfaction

    Finance, IT, Sales, HR, and other users of the Enterprise Application system can only optimize with the full support of each other. Cooperation between departments is crucial when trying to improve the technology capabilities and customer interaction.

    Drivers of Dissatisfaction
    Business Data People and teams Technology
    • Misaligned objectives
    • Product fit
    • Changing priorities
    • Lack of metrics
    • Access to data
    • Data hygiene
    • Data literacy
    • One view of the customer
    • User adoption
    • Lack of IT support
    • Training (use of data and system)
    • Vendor relations
    • Systems integration
    • Multi-channel complexity
    • Capability shortfall
    • Lack of product support

    Info-Tech Insight
    While technology is the key enabler of building strong customer experiences, there are many other drivers of dissatisfaction. IT must stand shoulder-to-shoulder with the business to develop a technology framework for Enterprise Applications.

    Case Study

    Align strategy and technology to meet consumer demand.

    NETFLIX

    INDUSTRY
    Entertainment

    SOURCE
    Forbes, 2017

    Challenge
    Beginning as a mail-out service, Netflix offered subscribers a catalog of videos to select from and have mailed to them directly. Customers no longer had to go to a retail store to rent a video. However, the lack of immediacy of direct mail as the distribution channel resulted in slow adoption.

    Blockbuster was the industry leader in video retail but was lagging in its response to industry, consumer, and technology trends around customer experience.

    Solution
    In response to the increasing presence of tech-savvy consumers on the internet, Netflix invested in developing an online platform as its primary distribution channel. The benefit of doing so was two-fold: passive brand advertising (by being present on the internet) and meeting customer demands for immediacy and convenience. Netflix also recognized the rising demand for personalized service and created an unprecedented, tailored customer experience.

    Results
    Netflix’s disruptive innovation is built on the foundation of great customer experience management. Netflix is now a $28 billion company, which is ten times what Blockbuster was worth.

    Netflix used disruptive technologies to innovatively build a customer experience that put it ahead of the long-time video rental industry leader, Blockbuster.

    Info-Tech’s methodology for selecting an Enterprise Application

    1. Build alignment and assemble the team 2. Define your EAS 3. Engage, evaluate, and select 4. Next steps
    Phase steps
    1. Aligning business and IT
    2. Readiness and resourcing
    1. Map capabilities
    2. List Requirements
    3. Prioritize requirements
    1. Know the products
    2. Engage the vendors
    3. Select properly
    1. Plan for implementation
    Phase outcomes Discuss organizational goals and how to advance those using the EA system. Identify gaps and remediation steps in preparation of the selection. Assemble the EA selection team. List and review business capabilities and translate into EAS requirements. Prioritize requirements for selection. Gain an understanding of the product offerings on the market. Engage the vendors through RFPs and conduct a proper evaluation with an objective evaluation criteria and framework. Review and discuss the different elements required in preparation for the implementation project.

    Blueprint deliverables

    Each step of this blueprint is accompanied by supporting deliverables to help you accomplish your goals:

    ERP/HRIS/CRM Requirements Template

    ERP Requirements Template

    Accelerate your requirement gathering with a pre-compiled list of common requirements.

    RFx Demo Scoring Tool

    RFx Demo Scoring Tool

    Quickly compare the vendors who respond to the RFx to identify the best fit for your needs.

    Key deliverable:

    RFx templates

    Use one of our templates to build a ready-for-distribution implementation partner RFx tailored to the unique success factors of your implementation.

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit Guided Implementation Workshop Consulting
    "Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful." "Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track." "We need to his the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place." "Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project."

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks are used throughout all four options

    Guided Implementation

    A Guided Implementation (GI) is a series of calls with an Info-Tech analyst to help implement our best practices in your organization.

    A typical GI is between six to ten calls over the course of four to six months.

    What does a typical GI on this topic look like?

    Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4

    Call #1: Scoping call to understand the current situation.

    Call #2: Discuss readiness and resourcing needs.

    Call #3: Discuss the capabilities and application inventory.

    Call #4: Discuss requirement gathering and prioritization.

    Call #5: Go over SoftwareReviews and review draft RFx.

    Call #6: Discuss evaluation tool and evaluation process.

    Call #7: Discuss preparation for implementation.

    Workshop Overview

    Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5
    Activities

    Organizational Strategic Needs

    1.1 Review the business context.

    1.2 Overview of the EAS Landscape

    1.2 Assess EAS project readiness

    1.3 Determine the members of the EAS selection team

    From Capabilities to Requirements

    2.1 Map business capabilities

    2.2 Inventory application and interactions

    2.3 Gather requirements

    2.4 Prioritize requirements

    Vendor Landscape and Your RFP

    3.1 Understanding product offerings

    3.2 Build a list of targeted vendors

    3.3 Build RFP

    3.4 Build vendor response template

    How to Evaluate Vendors

    4.1 Run a RFP evaluation simulation

    4.2 Build demo script

    4.3 Establish evaluation criteria

    Next Steps and Wrap-Up (offsite)

    5.1 Clean up in-progress deliverables from previous four days.

    5.2 Set up review time for workshop deliverables and to discuss next steps.

    Deliverables
    1. EAS Readiness Checklist and remediation plan
    2. List of members in EAS selection team
    1. List of key business processes
    2. Inventory application and data flow map
    3. Prioritized EAS requirements
    1. Draft RFP template
    2. Draft vendor response template
    1. Draft demo script template
    2. Draft vendor evaluation tool
    1. Completed RFP template
    2. Completed vendor response template
    3. Completed demo script template
    4. Vendor evaluation plan

    Contact your account representative for more information.
    workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8889

    Phase 1

    Build alignment and assemble the Team

    Phase 1
    1.1 Enterprise Application Landscape
    1.2 Validate Readiness
    1.3 Determine Resourcing

    Phase 2
    1.1 Capability Mapping
    1.2 Requirements Gathering Data Mapping
    1.3 Requirements Prioritizing

    Phase 3
    3.1 Understanding Product Offerings
    3.2 RFP & Demo Scripts
    3.3 Evaluation
    Select and Negotiate

    Phase 4
    4.1 Prepare for Implementation

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    Gain an understanding of recent EAS technology.

    Validate readiness before starting EAS selection.

    Assemble EAS selection team through identification of key players.

    This phase involves the following participants:

    Key stakeholders from the various areas of the business that will support the project, including:

    • CxO (e.g. CIO, CFO)
    • Departmental leaders
    • Project management team
    • Subject matter experts

    Select an Enterprise Application

    Create a compelling case that addresses strategic business objectives

    When someone at the organization asks you WHY, you need to deliver a compelling case. The ERP project will receive pushback, doubt, and resistance; if you can’t answer the question WHY, you will be left back-peddling.

    When faced with a challenge, prepare for the WHY.

    • Why do we need this?
    • Why are we spending all this money?
    • Why are we bothering?
    • Why is this important?
    • Why did we do it this way?
    • Why did we choose this vendor?

    Most organizations can answer “What?”

    Some organizations can answer “How?”

    Very few organizations have an answer for “Why?”

    Each stage of the project will be difficult and present its own unique challenges and failure points. Re-evaluate if you lose sight of WHY at any stage in the project.

    Ensure you have completed the necessary prerequisites for EAS selection

    Prior to embarking on selection, ensure you have set the right building blocks and completed the necessary prerequisites: your strategy and roadmap, and business case.

    STRATEGY & ROADMAP
    Whatever EAS is required, take the time to align your strategy and roadmap to business priorities. Right-size a technology strategy by assessing deployment model alternatives and future-state options with your EAS vision, operating model, and current-state assessment as inputs. Put your strategy to action with a living roadmap by following Info-Tech’s blueprint, Develop an Actionable Strategy and Roadmap.

    EAS BUSINESS CASE
    Use a business case to justify the business need for your EAS project and secure funding for moving forward with the proposal. A business case will further provide executive decision makers with the tools to compare and prioritize initiatives. Drive a consistent approach to promoting successful initiatives and holding the organization accountable to the projected benefits with Info-Tech’s blueprint, Reduce Time to Consensus With an Accelerated Business Case.

    Align the EAS strategy with the corporate strategy

    Corporate strategy Unified strategy EAS strategy
    • Conveys the current state of the organization and the path it wants to take.
    • Identifies future goals and business aspirations.
    • Communicates the initiatives that are critical for getting the organization from its current state to the future state.
    • EAS optimization can be and should be linked, with metrics, to the corporate strategy and ultimate business objectives.
    • Communicates the organization’s budget and spending on EAS.
    • Identifies IT initiatives that will support the business and key EAS objectives.
    • Outlines staffing and resourcing for EAS initiatives.

    Info-Tech Insight
    EAS projects are more successful when the management team understands the strategic importance and the criticality of alignment. Time needs to be spent upfront aligning business strategies with EAS capabilities. Effective alignment between IT and the business should happen daily. Alignment doesn’t just to occur at the executive level alone, but at each level of the organization.

    Understand how EAS fits into your wider IT organization

    Identify the IT drivers and opportunities to take advantage of when embarking on your EAS project.

    Greenfield or brownfield: Do you currently have an EAS? Do you have multiple EASs? What is the history of your EAS deployment? How customized is it?

    End of life: What lifecycle stage is it in?

    Utilization: Are there point solutions in your application portfolio that support some EAS capabilities? Is functionality duplicated and/or underutilized?

    Reason for change: What are your organizational drivers for this EAS project (e.g. acquisition/merger)?

    APPLICATION PORTFOLIO STRATEGY

    Business leaders need application managers to do more than support business operations. Applications must drive business growth, and application managers need their portfolios to be current and effective and to evolve continuously to support the business or risk being marginalized. Rationalize your applications with a roadmap that propels the business forward.

    Go to this link

    Before switching vendors, evaluate your existing EAS to see if it’s being underutilized or could use an upgrade

    The cost of switching vendors can be challenging, but it will depend entirely on the quality of data and whether it makes sense to keep it.

    • Achieving success when switching vendors first requires reflection. We need to ask why we are dissatisfied with our incumbent software.
    • If the product is old and inflexible, the answer may be obvious, but don’t be afraid to include your incumbent in your evaluation if your issues might be solved with an upgrade.
    • Look at your use-case requirements to see where you want to take the EAS solution and compare them to your incumbent’s roadmap. If they don’t match, switching vendors may be the only solution. If your roadmaps align, see if you’re fully leveraging the solution or will be able to start working through process improvements

    Fully leveraging your current software now will have two benefits:

    1 It may turn out that poor leveraging of your incumbent software was the problem all along; switching vendors won’t solve the problem by itself. As the data to the right shows, a fifth of SMEs and a quarter of large enterprises do not fully leverage their incumbent software.
    2 If you still decide to switch, you’ll be in a good negotiating position. If vendors can see you are engaged and fully leveraging your software, they will be less complacent during negotiations to win you over.
    20%
    Small/Medium
    Enterprises
    25%
    Large
    Enterprises
    only occasionally or rarely/never use their software

    Source: SoftwareReviews, 2020; N=45,027

    Info-Tech Insight
    Switching vendors won’t improve poor internal processes. To be fully successful and meet the goals of the business case, new software implementations must be accompanied by process review and improvement.

    Familiarize yourself with the EAS market

    How it got here Where it’s going
    • Acquisition and consolidation: The major vendors in the industry have grown over time through acquisition, particularly focusing on expanding products in industrial verticals.
    • Product stack: What it means is having to navigate complexity related to the product stack when thinking about EAS, which turns the conversation from EAS as a single product to EAS as a package of multiple products.
    • Modularity and interoperability: The benefit of the stack is that it often means modularity and the ability to implement parts of a solution or in an order that aligns to the customer’s needs. On the other hand, the stack is not always understood by or well communicated to the customer, and the interdependence of components often means they must be licensed together.
    • Customizable cloud: Software-as-a-Service in multitenant environments offers a hands-off value proposition, but increasingly customers are looking to customize their instances beyond the capability offered through configurability.
    • Best-of-breed consolidation: EAS vendors are continuing to consolidate functionality to increase interoperability and increase ease of integration. The market is rife with acquisitions and mergers, making the strong players even stronger.
    • Client experience: While most vendors now offer products that will meet the wide gamut of EAS business requirements, vendors are now paying extra attention to the client experience from partnership perspective.

    Info-Tech Insight
    Evaluating the EAS vendor landscape is becoming increasingly difficult as the playing field evens out in terms of functionality offerings. As such, it is becoming increasingly important to more meticulously evaluate vendors themselves as part of the selection process. This is especially important in EAS projects, as they tend to be multi-year in nature and result in long-term vendor partnerships.

    What types of Enterprise solutions are at my disposal?

    IT leaders typically compare EAS on-premises with SaaS options, but there are actually four different deployment scenarios.

    1. On Premises 3. Proprietary Cloud 4. White-Label Cloud 2. SaaS
    • The traditional model for EAS deployment.
    • Upfront licensing term plus annual maintenance/ support fee.
    • Requires local server, database, and authentication.
    • Good support for industry modules.
    • Customizable.
    • EAS vendor hosts an instance of the EAS system in its own data center.
    • Patches may or may not be applied automatically.
    • Monthly per-user or traditional billing.
    • Otherwise, as with on premises.
    • EAS VAR or reseller hosts an instance of the EAS system in its own data center or in a public IaaS provider’s (e.g. Rackspace, Amazon EC2).
    • Otherwise, as with proprietary cloud.
    • Common model for cloud EAS.
    • All users share a single instance.
    • Patches and updates are applied automatically.
    • Monthly per-user fee.
    • Poor industry support.
    • Configurable but not customizable.

    Info-Tech Insight
    Cloud may apply in other ways to the EAS implementation. Most vendors offer particular EAS services delivered via the cloud. For example, some vendors offers CRM, project management, and payroll self-service as cloud-based options to augment on-premises ERP solutions.

    Know when to adopt and when to bypass cloud EAS

    Use the following guidelines to determine if your organization will benefit from the cloud, or if you should stick to a more traditional delivery model.

    Adopt a cloud-based EAS platform if you have: Do not adopt a cloud-based EAS platform if you have:
    Standard processes – Businesses that have standard, repeatable processes can benefit greatly from the cost savings that cloud provides, as the need for expensive customizations is greatly minimized. Highly regulated industry – Although there is no hard evidence that says cloud-based solutions are not able to support security or compliance needs, in certain industries such as banking or insurance, cloud is not the norm and may be a tough sell for IT.
    Lean IT operations – Organizations with lean IT or no formal IT departments supporting them will find SaaS EAS particularly appealing. Those with IT that can support day-to-day operations but are not prepared for disaster recovery should also consider cloud EAS, either hosted or SaaS-based. Unreliable network – If the business regularly faces network outages or remote employees have unreliable internet connections, a cloud-based solution may not be the best option. IT would face many complaints from disgruntled workers unable to access data.
    Mobile workforce – Telecommuting is becoming more common, as is the requirement for data to be readily available for those on the road. Using cloud is a good way to provide this functionality. Unsavvy workforce – Organizations that prefer to be late adopters of technology may face strong resistance to taking their software to the cloud. Some employees may not like the idea of using a browser to connect to the system.

    Info-Tech Insight
    Knowing when to choose a cloud EAS deployment comes down to two main factors: knowing the level of complexity required by the business, and knowing the available IT resources that can be dedicated to support and manage EAS.

    Consider 3 classic scenarios when evaluating cloud EAS

    Cloud EAS should be considered by all organizations, but these scenarios present the strongest opportunity.

    The Startup The Spinoff The Modernizer
    • There is no greenfield in ERP, but if you’re a startup, you’re quite close.
    • Given the virtually nonexistent IT department in startups, having an on-premises ERP can be daunting. A SaaS delivery model is usually the best choice in these scenarios. Even if the resources are available, they are better spent driving business growth.
    • Startups typically have less stringent industry requirements, making SaaS a more attractive option.
    • Though not entirely new companies, spinoffs or subsidiaries often have needs similar to those of startups but with an added integration requirement.
    • When it comes to ERP, the deployment type will depend on how resources are split with the parent company. If there is little to no IT support, then SaaS is ideal.
    • If the parent company is already using cloud ERP, whether SaaS, hosted, or an internal cloud, then it is often easy for the spinoff to gain access as well.
    • Companies with legacy systems that are not salvageable, or out-of-date point solutions that do not scale, have the opportunity to start from scratch.
    • Those looking at reducing capital expenses should consider SaaS and hosted ERP deployments.
    • Those looking at having state-of-the-art technology in-house should consider building an internal private cloud that supports their ERP deployment.

    Make sure you are ready to proceed with selection

    Organizational readiness is essential for maximizing the benefits realized from your ERP. Cover all critical elements of pre-work, resources, buy-in, and strategy and planning before embarking on ERP selection and/or implementation.

    Pre-work
    Current State Understanding
    Business Process Improvement
    Future State Vision

    Resources
    Project Team
    Governance Structures
    Third-Party Partners
    Cost and Budget

    Buy-in
    Goals and Objectives
    Exec Business Sponsorship
    Stakeholder Engagement
    Change Management

    STRATEGY and PLANNING
    ERP Strategy & Roadmap
    Risk Management
    Project Metrics

    Without a preparedness assessment, organizations end up wasting a lot of time on resolving gaps in planning that could have been mitigated upfront, which ultimately makes the implementation project more challenging.
    – Suanne McGrath-Kelly, President & Principal Consultant, Plan in Motion Inc., interviewed by Info-Tech, 2019.

    Assess your EAS readiness before moving forward

    To avoid common project pitfalls, complete the necessary prerequisites before proceeding with EAS. Consider whether the risks of proceeding unprepared fall within your organization’s risk tolerance. If they do not, pivot back to strategy.

    Preceding tasks Risks of proceeding unprepared
    Project Vision
    Project Scope
    EAS Business Case
    Current State Map
    Improvement Opportunity Analysis
    Future State Considerations
    Strategic Requirements
    Project Metrics and Benchmarks
    Risk Assessment
    EAS Strategic Roadmap
    EAS Project Work Initiatives
    Misalignment of project objectives
    Time and cost overruns
    Lack of executive buy-in or support
    Over- or under-investment in systems
    Unknown and unmet system requirements
    Product selection misfit
    Misalignment of requirements to needs
    Inability to measure project success
    Inability to proactively mitigate risk impact
    Lack of decision-making traceability
    Unclear expectations of tasks and roles

    1.2.1 Assess EAS selection readiness

    1 – 2 hours

    1. As a group, review Section 1 of the EAS Readiness Assessment Checklist with the core project team and/or project sponsor, item by item. For completed items, tick the corresponding checkbox. Document all incomplete items in the Readiness Remediation Plan table in the first column (“Incomplete Readiness Item”).
    2. For each incomplete item, use your discretion to determine whether the completion is critical in preparation for EAS selection and implementation. This may vary given the complexity of your EAS project. If the item is critical to the project, indicate this with “Y” in the second column (“Criticality (Y/N)”).
    3. For each critical item, reflect on the barriers that have prevented or are preventing its completion. Possible barriers include incomplete task dependencies, low value to effort determination, lack of organizational knowledge or resources, pressure of deadlines, etc. Document these barriers in the third column (“Barriers to Completion”).
    4. Determine a remediation approach for each barrier identified. Document the approach in the fourth column (“Remediation Approach”).
      1. For each remediation activity, designate a due date and remediation owner. Document this in the fifth column (“Due Date and Owner”).
      2. Carry out the remediation of critical tasks and return to this blueprint to kick-start your selection and implementation project.
    Input Output
    • EAS Foundation
    • EAS Strategy
    • Readiness remediation approach
    • Validation of ERP project readiness
    Materials Participants
    • EAS Readiness Assessment Checklist
    • Project sponsor
    • Core project team

    Download the EAS Readiness Assessment Checklist

    Build a well-balanced core team to see the project through

    Have a cross-departmental team define goals and objectives in order to significantly increase EAS success and improve communication.

    • Hold a meeting with Finance, Operations, and IT stakeholders. The overall objective of the meeting is to confirm that all parties agree on the goals and metrics that gauge success of the EAS project.
    • The kick-off process will significantly improve internal communications. Invite all impacted internal groups to work as a team to address any significant issues before the application process is formally activated.
    • Set up a quarterly review process to understand changing needs. This will change the way the EAS system will be utilized.

    “Each individual should understand at least one business area and have a hand in another.”
    – Mark Earley
    Senior Research Director,
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Info-Tech Insight
    An EAS selection and implementation requires more than just a procurement team. The core EAS project team should be cross-functional. .

    Be ready with a resourcing strategy for your EAS project

    EAS selection and implementation is a giant undertaking that can rarely be supported by internal resources alone.

    It is important to understand where your organization’s resourcing gaps are when embarking on a selection and implementation project. Once gaps are identified, the amount of external support needed from vendor(s), consultants, or system integrators can be determined.

    Select from the three most commonly used resourcing strategies for EAS selection and implementation projects:

    • Implement in-house using your own staff.
    • Implement using a combination of your own staff and professional services from the vendor(s) and/or system integrator (SI).
    • Implement using professional services.

    Build your implementation team

    Prioritize members from your core selection team. They will have strong insight into the tool and its envisioned position in the organization.

    General Roles

    1. Integration Specialists
    2. Solution or Enterprise Architects
    3. QA Engineer
    4. IT Service Management Team

    External Roles

    1. Vendor’s Implementation Team or Professional Services
    2. Systems Integrator (SI)

    Right-size the EAS selection team to ensure you get the right information but are still able to move ahead quickly

    Full-Time Resourcing: At least one member of these five team members must be allocated to the selection initiative as a full-time resource.

    IT Leader Technical Lead Business Analyst/
    Project Manager
    Business Lead Process Expert(s)
    This team member is an IT director or CIO who will provide sponsorship and oversight from the IT perspective. This team member will focus on application security, integration, and enterprise architecture. This team member elicits business needs and translates them into technology requirements. This team member will provide sponsorship from the business needs perspective. Typically, a CXO or SVP of a business function. These team members are the business process owners who will help steer the requirements and direction.

    Info-Tech Insight
    It is critical for the selection team to determine who has decision rights. Organizational culture will play the largest role in dictating which team member holds the final say for selection decisions. For more information on stakeholder management and involvement, see this guide.

    Complete the project timeline required during your selection phase

    Include as many steps as necessary to understand, validate, and compare vendor solutions so you can make a confident, well-informed decision.

    Use Info-Tech’s 15-Step Selection Process:

    1. Initiate procurement.
    2. Select procurement manager.
    3. Prepare for procurement; check that prerequisites are met.
    4. Select appropriate procurement vehicle (RFI, RFP, RFQ, etc.).
    5. Assemble procurement teams.
    6. Create procurement project plan.
    7. Identify and notify vendors about procurement.
    8. Configure procurement process.
    9. Gather requirements.
    10. Prioritize requirements.
    11. Build the procurement documentation package.
    12. Issue the procurement.
    13. Evaluate proposals.
    14. Evaluate vendor demos and reference checks.
    15. Recommend a vendor.

    Strengthen your procurement. If your organization lacks a clear selection process, refer to Info-Tech's Implement a Proactive and Consistent Vendor Selection Process research to help construct a formal process for procuring application technology.

    Download the Implement a Proactive and Consistent Vendor Selection Process

    Visualize what success looks like

    Understand how success metrics are relevant at each stage of strategy formation by keeping the end in mind. Apply a similar thought model to your other success metrics for a holistic evaluation of your strategy.

    Implementation
    Pre-Implementation Post-Implementation
    Baseline measure Strategic insight Strategic action Success measure End result
    Use data you already have. Any given pain point can act as your pre-implementation baseline. Previously, this measure may have been evaluated by asking “what?” or “how much?” Move away from looking at your baseline measure as transactional data, and incorporate the ability to generate strategic insight with your EAS. Change the questions you are asking to drive insights: “who?” “why?” and “how does it affect the business?” Support the business by putting your strategic analytics into action. Ensure there are capabilities built into your ERP to strategically address your baseline measure. Leverage these functions to act on your strategic insights. In the interest of IT and business alignment, speak the same language when measuring success. Use a business success measurement to determine the contribution made by your EAS strategy. Visualize your success in the context of the business as a whole. Projecting success in the interest of your stakeholders will gain and maintain buy-in, allowing you to leverage the strategic functionality of your new EAS.
    Example Time to Procure Delay in time to procure caused by bottleneck in requisition processing ERP used to create advanced workflows to streamline requisition approval process Time efficiencies gained free up employee time to focus on more strategic efforts Contributed to strategic operational innovation

    Prove the value of your EAS through metrics

    Establish baseline metrics early and measure throughout the project can iteratively prove the value of your EAS.

    Functional processes IT resource efficiency
    Functional benefits and efficiencies gained through effectively diagnosing and meeting business needs. Benefits enabled through reductions in IT system, network, and resource usage.
    Example metrics Record to report
    • Days to close month-end
    • Time to produce statements
    Market to order
    • Customer retention rate
    • Conversion/Cost per lead
    • Number of help desk requests
    • Number of active users
    • Time to resolution
    Quote to cash
    • Sales cycle duration
    • Cash conversion cycle
    Issue to resolution
    • # of returns
    • # of customer complaints
    • Time to resolve complaints
    Procure to pay
    • Average time to procure
    • Cycle time of purchase order
    Forecast to delivery
    • Variance of demand plan
    • Time to replenish inventory
    Plan to perform
    • Time to complete plan
    • Variance of plan to actual
    Hire to retire
    • Training $ per employee
    • Total overtime cost

    Improve baseline metrics through…

    1. Increased help desk efficiency. Through training of personnel and increased efficiency of processes.
    2. Increased level of self-service for end users. Implementation of functionality that matches business needs will increase the efficiency of functional business tasks.
    3. Decreased time to escalation. Knowing when to escalate tasks sooner can decrease wasted effort by tier-one workers.
    4. Automation of simple, repetitive tasks. Automation frees time for more important tasks.

    1.3.1 Assemble EAS selection team

    1 hour

    1. Working as a group, list key players in the organization that should be in EAS selection team.
    2. Determine the role of each member.
    3. Define the level of commitment each member can have on the EAS selection team. Keep in mind their availabilities during the selection process.
    4. Determine who has decision rights.
    Input Output
    • Knowledge of the team, governance structure, and organizational culture
    • List members in EAS selection team
    Materials Participants
    • Sticky notes
    • Markers
    • Executive sponsor
    • Core project team

    Phase 2

    Define your EAS

    Phase 1
    1.1 Enterprise Application Landscape
    1.2 Validate Readiness
    1.3 Determine Resourcing

    Phase 2
    2.1 Capability Mapping
    2.2 Requirements Gathering Data Mapping
    2.3 Requirements Prioritizing

    Phase 3
    3.1 Understanding Product Offerings
    3.2 RFP & Demo Scripts
    3.3 Evaluation
    Select and Negotiate

    Phase 4
    4.1 Prepare for
    Implementation

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    Identifying business processes , inventory applications and data flows, gathering requirements and prioritizing them.

    This phase involves the following participants:

    Key stakeholders from the various areas of the business that will support the project including:

    • CxO (e.g. CIO, CFO)
    • Departmental leaders
    • Project management team
    • Subject matter experts
    • Core project team

    Select an Enterprise Application

    Leverage Info-Tech’s requirements gathering framework to serve as the basis for capturing your CRM requirements

    Requirements Gathering Framework

    Info-Tech’s Requirements Gathering Framework is a comprehensive approach to requirements management that can be scaled to any size of project or organization. This framework ensures that the application created will capture the needs of all stakeholders and deliver business value. Don’t treat elicitation, analysis, and validation in isolation: planning, monitoring, communicating, and managing must permeate all three stages in order to avoid makeshift solutions.

    Capability vs. process vs. feature

    Understanding the difference

    When examining HRMS optimization it is important to approach it from the appropriate layer.

    Capability:

    • The ability of an entity (e.g. organization or department) to achieve its objectives (APQC, 2017).
    • An ability that an organization, person, or system possesses. They are typically expressed in general and high-level terms and typically require a combination of organization, people, processes, and technology to achieve (TOGAF).

    Process:

    • Processes can be manual or technology enabled. A process is a series of interrelated activities that convert inputs into results (outputs).
    • Processes consume resources, require standards for repeatable performance, and respond to control systems that direct the quality, rate, and cost of performance. The same process can be highly effective in one circumstance and poorly effective in another with different systems, tools, knowledge, and people (APQC, 2017).

    Feature:

    • A distinguishing characteristic of a software item (e.g. performance, portability, or functionality) (IEEE, 2005).

    In today’s complex organizations, it can be difficult to understand where inefficiencies stem from and how performance can be enhanced.

    To fix problems and maximize efficiencies, organizations must examine business capabilities and processes to determine gaps and areas of lagging performance.

    Info-Tech’s HRIS framework and industry tools such as the APQC’s Process Classification Framework can help make sense of this.

    Process inventory

    Business capability map (Level 0)

    Business Capability Map

    If you do not have a documented process model, you can use the APQC Framework to help define your inventory of business processes.
    APQC’s Process Classification Framework is a taxonomy of cross-functional business processes intended to allow the objective comparison of organizational performance within and among organizations.

    In business architecture, the primary view of an organization is known as a business capability map.

    A business capability defines what a business does to enable value creation rather than how.

    Business capabilities:

    • Represent stable business functions.
    • Are unique and independent of each other.
    • Will typically have a defined business outcome.

    A business capability map provides details that help the business architecture practitioner direct attention to a specific area of the business for further assessment.

    EAS process mapping

    Objectives The organization’s objectives are typically outcomes that the organization is looking to achieve as a result of the business strategy.
    Value Streams Value streams are external/internal processes that help the organization realize its goals.
    Capabilities The what: Business capabilities support value streams in the creation and capture of value.
    Processes The how: Business processes define how they will fulfill a given capability.

    The operating model

    An operating model is a framework that drives operating decisions. It helps to set the parameters for the scope of EAS and the processes that will be supported. The operating model will serve to group core operational processes. These groupings represent a set of interrelated, consecutive processes aimed at generating a common output.

    The value stream

    Value stream defined:

    Value Streams Design Product Produce Product Sell Product Customer Service
    • Manufacturers work proactively to design products and services that will meet consumer demand.
    • Products are driven by consumer demand and governmental regulations.
    • Production processes and labor costs are constantly analyzed for efficiencies and accuracies.
    • Quality of product and services are highly regulated through all levels of the supply chain.
    • Sales networks and sales staff deliver the product from the organization to the end consumer.
    • Marketing plays a key role throughout the value stream, connecting consumers’ wants and needs to the products and services offered.
    • Relationships with consumers continue after the sale of products and services.
    • Continued customer support and data mining is important to revenue streams.

    Value streams connect business goals to the organization’s value realization activities in the marketplace. Those activities are dependent on the specific industry segment in which an organization operates.

    There are two types of value streams: core and support.

    • Core value streams are mostly external-facing. They deliver value to either external or internal customers and they tie to the customer perspective of the strategy map.
    • Support value streams are internal-facing and provide the foundational support for an organization to operate.

    An effective method for ensuring all value streams have been considered is to understand that there can be different end-value receivers.

    2.1.1 List your key processes

    1-3 hours

    1. As a group, discuss the business capabilities, value streams, and business processes.
    2. For each capability determine the following:
      1. Is this capability applicable to our organization?
      2. What application, if any, supports this capability?
    3. Are there any missing capabilities to add?
    Input Output
    • Current systems
    • Key processes
    • APQC Framework
    • Organizational process map
    • List of key business processes
    Materials Participants
    • APQC Framework
    • Whiteboard, PowerPoint, or flip charts and markers
    • Primary stakeholders in each value stream supported by the EAS
    • Core project team

    Activity 2.1.1 – Process inventory

    Core finance Core HR Workforce management Talent Management Warehouse management Enterprise asset management
    Process Technology Process Technology Process Technology Process Technology Process Technology Process Technology
    • General ledger
    • Accounts payable
    • Accounts receivable
    • GL consolidation
    • Cash management
    • Billing and invoicing
    • Expenses
    • Payroll accounting
    • Tax management
    • Reporting
    • Payroll administration
    • Benefits administration
    • Position management
    • Organizational structure
    • Core HR records
    • Time and attendance
    • Leave management
    • Scheduling
    • Performance management
    • Talent acquisition
    • Offboarding & onboarding
    • Plan layout
    • Manage inventory
    • Manage loading docks
    • Pick, pack, ship
    • Plan and manage workforce
    • Manage returns
    • Transfer product cross-dock
    • Asset lifecycle management
    • Supply chain management
    • Maintenance planning and scheduling
    Planning and budgeting Strategic HR Procurement Customer relationship management Facilities management Project management
    Process Technology Process Technology Process Technology Process Technology Process Technology Process Technology
    • Budget reporting
    • Variance analysis
    • Multi-year operating plan
    • Monthly forecasting
    • Annual operating plan
    • Compensation planning
    • Workforce planning
    • Succession planning
    • Supplier management
    • Purchase order management
    • Workflow approvals
    • Contract / tender management
    • Contact management
    • Activity management
    • Analytics
    • Plan and acquire
    • Asset maintenance
    • Disposal
    • Project management
    • Project costing
    • Budget control
    • Document management

    Gaining Enterprise Architecture Oversight during application selection yields better user satisfaction results

    Procurement/Legal Oversight and
    Low satisfaction with software selection High satisfaction with software selection
    Process % Used % Used Process
    Used ROI/Cost Benefit Analysis 42% 43% Used ROI/Cost-Benefit Analysis
    Used Formal Decision Criteria 39% 41% Used Formal Decision Criteria
    Approval 33% 37% Enterprise Architecture Oversight and Approval
    Security Oversight and Approval 27% 36% Security Oversight and Approval
    Used Third-Party Data Reports 26% 28% Procurement/Legal Oversight and Approval
    Enterprise Architecture Oversight and Approval 26% 28% Used Third-Party Data Reports
    Used a Consultant 21% 17% Used a Consultant

    High satisfaction was defined as a response of 8, 9, or 10 from the overall recommendation question. Low satisfaction was 7 or less.

    Source: SoftwareReviews, 2018

    Map data flow

    Example ERP data flow

    Example ERP data flow

    When assessing the current application portfolio that supports your EAS, the tendency will be to focus on the applications under the EAS umbrella. These relate mostly to marketing, sales, and customer service. Be sure to include systems that act as input to, or benefit due to outputs from EAS or similar applications.

    Be sure to include enterprise applications that are not included in the EAS application portfolio. Popular systems to consider for POIs include billing, directory services, content management, and collaboration tools.

    Integration is paramount: your EAS application often integrates with other applications within the organization. Create an integration map to reflect a system of record and the exchange of data. To increase customer engagement, channel integration is a must (i.e. with robust links to unified communications solutions, email, and VoIP telephony systems).

    Enterprise application landscape

    Enterprise application landscape

    2.1.2 Inventory applications and interactions

    1-3 hours

    1. Individually list all electronic systems involved in the EAS function of the organization.
    2. Document data flows into and out of each system to the EAS. Refer to the example on the previous slides (ERP data flow) and sample Enterprise Application map.
    3. Review the processes in place (look at each functional area, including data moving into and out of systems.) Document manual processes. Identify integration points. If flow charts exist for these processes, it may be useful to provide these to the participants.
    4. If possible, diagram the system. Include information direction flow.
    Input Output
    • Business process inventory
    • List of applications (if available)
    • Current systems
    • Data flow map
    Materials Participants
    • Whiteboard, markers
    • Internal requirements documentation tools (if available)
    • Business analyst(s)
    • Subject matter experts
    • Core project team (optional)

    Understand how to navigate the complex web of stakeholders in ERP requirements gathering

    Identify which stakeholders to include and what their level of involvement should be during requirements elicitation based on relevant topic expertise.

    Sponsor End user IT Business
    Description An internal stakeholder who has final sign-off on the ERP project. Frontline users of the ERP technology. Back-end support staff who are tasked with project planning, execution, and eventual system maintenance. Additional stakeholders who will be impacted by any ERP technology changes.
    Examples
    • CEO
    • CIO/CTO
    • COO
    • CFO
    • Warehouse personnel
    • Sales teams
    • HR admins
    • Applications manager
    • Vendor relationship manager(s)
    • Director, Procurement
    • VP, Marketing
    • Manager, HR
    Value Executive buy-in and support is essential to the success of the project. Often, the sponsor controls funding and resource allocation. End users determine the success of the system through user adoption. If the end user does not adopt the system, the system is deemed useless and benefits realization is poor. IT is likely to be responsible for more in-depth requirements gathering. IT possesses critical knowledge concerning system compatibility, integration, and data. Involving business stakeholders in the requirements gathering will ensure alignment between HR and organizational objectives.

    Stakeholder influence vs. interest

    Large-scale EAS projects require the involvement of many stakeholders from all corners and levels of the organization, including project sponsors, IT, end users, and business stakeholders. Consider the influence and interest of stakeholders in contributing to the requirements elicitation process and involve them accordingly.

    Chart of Stakeholder Involvement during selection

    Extract functional and non-functional requirements from the customer interaction business process diagrams

    Once the most significant processes have been mapped, the business requirements must be extracted from the maps and transformed into functional and non-functional requirements. The example below illustrates how to extract requirements from an insurance claim process for the Record Claim step.

    Task Input Output Risks Opportunities Condition Sample requirements
    Record customer service claim Customer email Case record
    • Agent accidentally misses the email and case is not submitted
    • Reduce time to populate customer’s claim information into the case
    • Automation of data capture and routing
    • Pre-population of the case with the email contents
    • Suggested routing based on nature of case
    • Multi-language support

    Business:

    • System requires email-to-case functionality

    Non-functional:

    • The cases must be supported in multiple languages

    Functional:

    • The case must support the following information:
      • Title
      • Customer
      • Subject
      • Case origin
      • Case type

    Example claims process

    2.2.1 Capture your EAS requirements

    Time required varies

    1. Focus groups of 10-20 individuals may be the best way to ensure complete coverage of business requirements for EAS. This group should be cross-functional, with manager- or director-level representation from the departments that have a vested interest in the EAS project.
    2. Use your organization’s standard internal tools or download Info-Tech’s ERP Requirements Template, HRIS Requirements Template, or CRM Requirements Template.
    3. Document the requirements from the elicitation sessions.
    • The core team of business analysts should be present throughout, and the sessions should be led by an experienced facilitator (such as a senior business analyst).
    • Requirements for EAS should focus on achieving the future state rather than replicating the current state.
    • The facilitator should steer the team toward requirements that are solution-agnostic (i.e. not coached in terms of a particular vendor or product). Focus on customer and internal personas to help drive requirements.
    Input Output
    • Business unit functional requirements
    • Business process inventory
    • Data flow map
    • Inventory of business requirements
    Materials Participants
    • Whiteboard, markers
    • Internal requirements documentation tools (if available)
    • Info-Tech’s ERP Requirements Template, HRIS Requirements Template, or CRM Requirements Template (optional)
    • Business analyst(s)
    • Project manager
    • Subject matter experts
    • Core project team (optional)

    Prioritize your EAS requirements to assist with the selection

    Requirements prioritization ensures that the ERP selection project team focuses on the right requirements when putting together the RFP.

    Prioritization is the process of ranking each requirement based on its importance to project success. Hold a meeting for the domain SMEs, implementation SMEs, project managers, and project sponsors to prioritize the requirements list. At the conclusion of the meeting, each requirement should be assigned a priority level. The implementation SMEs will use these priority levels to ensure efforts are targeted toward the proper requirements and to plan features available on each release.

    Use the MoSCoW Model of Prioritization to effectively order requirements.

    The MoSCoW Model of Prioritization
    Must have Requirements must be implemented for the solution to be considered successful.
    Should have Requirements that are high priority should be included in the solution if possible.
    Could have Requirements are desirable but not necessary and could be included if resources are available.
    Won't have Requirements won’t be in the next release, but will be considered for the future releases.

    The MoSCoW model was introduced by Dai Clegg of Oracle UK in 1994. MindTools.

    Base your prioritization on the right set of criteria

    Effective prioritization criteria

    Criteria Description
    Regulatory and legal compliance These requirements will be considered mandatory.
    Policy compliance Unless an internal policy can be altered or an exception can be made, these requirements will be considered mandatory.
    Business value significance Give a higher priority to high-value requirements.
    Business risk Any requirement with the potential to jeopardize the entire project should be given a high priority and implemented early.
    Likelihood of success Especially in “proof of concept” projects, it is recommended that requirements have good odds.
    Implementation complexity Give a higher priority to low implementation difficulty requirements.
    Alignment with strategy Give a higher priority to requirements that enable the corporate strategy.
    Urgency Prioritize requirements based on time sensitivity.
    Dependencies A requirement on its own may be low priority, but if it supports a high-priority requirement, then its priority must match it.

    2.3.1 Prioritize your solution requirements

    Time required varies

    1. Consolidate all duplicate requirements to form a mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive list of functional and non-functional requirements.
    2. Identify the significance of each requirement for your solution evaluation according to the MoSCoW model. Control the number of mandatory requirements you document. Too many mandatory requirements could create an unrealistic framework for evaluating solutions.
    3. Categorize your requirements and delineate between functional (i.e. capabilities the system will be able to perform) and non-functional (i.e. environmental conditions of the system, such as technical and security requirements).
    InputOutput
    • Inventory of business requirements
    • Inventory of business requirements with priorities
    MaterialsParticipants
    • Whiteboard, markers
    • Internal requirements documentation tools (if available)
    • Info-Tech’s ERP Requirements Template, HRIS Requirements Template, or CRM Requirements Template (optional)
    • Business analyst(s)
    • Project manager
    • Subject matter experts
    • Core project team

    Identify which vendors’ product and capabilities meet your must-have requirements

    Highlight must-haves in the RFP

    • Once you have prioritized your business requirements for the EAS initiative, it is time to package them into an RFP.
    • It is critical to highlight must-have requirements in the RFP document. Doing so immediately eliminates vendors who do not feel that their products are suitable for your needs.

    WATCH OUT!

    Many vendors will try to stretch their capabilities to fit your must-have requirements. Leverage vendor demos in the next stage of selection to quickly rule out products that do not cover your critical requirements.

    Identify key process areas where you require vendor knowledge

    Example of Key process areas

    Completing a process inventory and a list of EAS requirements often shows process areas that need updates and improvement. Take this opportunity to highlight areas where you would benefit from knowing about most recent best practices and technologies.

    Inquire about these when engaging the vendor to know their level of knowledge and how their products work best in your industry.

    General product knowledge requests are not enough. Be specific.

    Determine the product knowledge areas that are specific to your implementation.

    Product Knowledge Proof of Concept Development Customer Service Warehousing Core HR Other Overall
    Data Security *
    Process Improvements * *
    Configuration
    Data Architecture *
    Integration
    On premise Infrastructure
    Cloud Infrastructure *
    Other

    Identify the product knowledge that is required in relation to your implementation. This can include core product knowledge and should be related to larger infrastructure and organizational requirements.

    More than just functional requirements

    What to include What to look at What is differentiating
    • Remember to include must-have conditions that do not directly relate to the behavior or functionality of the EAS product, but rather describe environmental conditions under which the solution must remain effective or qualities that the systems must have.
    • These can include requirements related to capacity, speed, security, availability, and the information architecture and presentation of the user interface.
    • Consider the vendor’s overall ability to execute.
      • Are they financially stable?
      • Do they have the resources to execute?
      • Do they have the skills to execute?
      • Are they able to provide post-implementation support?
    • Vendors understand that SaaS isn’t for everyone. Deployment models are one way they will continue to differentiate themselves.
    • Some vendors choose to compete on breadth and others on depth of expertise in public, private, and hosted cloud offerings.

    Info-Tech Insight
    Be wary of sunsetting products! Selecting the EAS based on a good knowledge of the vendor’s roadmap allows for business operations to continue without having to repeat a selection and implementation project in the near future.

    Dominant use-case scenarios for potential ERP solutions

    While an organization may be both product- and service-centric, most organizations fall into one of the two categories.

    Use case: Public sector

    The service-centric ERP use case is suitable for most organizations in the public sector. With that in mind, consider ERP solutions that offer grant disbursements, fleet management, and staffing/resourcing capabilities.

    Product-centric ERP Service-centric ERP
    What it is The product-centric ERP is suitable for organizations that manufacture, assemble, distribute, or manage material goods throughout a product lifecycle. ERP vendors and/or products that align to this use case usually cater to industries such as manufacturing, retail, aerospace and defense, distribution, and food and beverage. The service-centric ERP use case is suitable for organizations that provide and manage field services and/or professional services throughout a project lifecycle. ERP vendors and/or products that align to this use case usually cater to industries such as utilities, maintenance and repair, government, education, and professional services (i.e. consulting, legal).
    How it works Product-centric ERP has strong functionality in supply chain management, manufacturing, procurement management, and material job and project management. Service-centric ERP has strong functionality in resource job and project management, service management, and customer relationship management.

    EAS table stakes vs differentiating features

    Make sure features align with your objectives first.

    What are table stakes / standard features?

    • For every type of EAS, such as ERP, HRIS, and CRM, certain features are standard, but that doesn’t mean they are all equal.
    • The existence of features doesn’t guarantee quality or functionality to the standards you need. Never assume that yes in a features list means you don’t need to ask for a demo.

    What is differentiating/additional feature?

    • Differentiating features take two forms:
      • Some platforms offer differentiating features that are vertical specific.
      • Other platforms offer differentiating features that are considered cutting edge. These cutting-edge features may become table stakes over time.
    • These features may increase productivity but also require process changes.

    Info-Tech Insight
    If table stakes are all you need from your EAS solution, the only true differentiator for the organization is price. Otherwise, dig deeper to find the best price to value for your needs. Remove the product from your shortlist if table stakes are not met!

    Reign-In Ballooning Scope for EAS Selection Projects

    Stretching the EAS beyond its core capabilities is a short-term solution for a long-term problem. Educate stakeholders about the limits of EAS technology.

    Common pitfalls for EAS selection

    • Tangential capabilities may require separate solutions. It is common for stakeholders to list features such as content management as part of the new EAS platform. While content management goes hand in hand with the EAS’s ability to manage customer interactions, document management is best handled by a standalone platform.

    Keeping stakeholders engaged and in line

    • Ballooning scope leads to stakeholder dissatisfaction. Appeasing stakeholders by over customizing the platform will lead to integration and headaches down the road.
    • Make sure stakeholders feel heard. Do not turn down ideas in the midst of an elicitation session. Once the requirements gathering sessions are completed, the project team has the opportunity to mark requirements as “out of scope”, and communicate the reasoning behind the decision.
    • Educate stakeholders on the core functionality of EAS. Many stakeholders do not know the best-fit use cases for EAS platforms. Help end users understand what EAS is good at, and where additional technologies will be needed.

    Phase 3

    Engage, Evaluate, and Finalize Selection

    Phase 1
    1.1 Enterprise Application Landscape
    1.2 Validate Readiness
    1.3 Determine Resourcing

    Phase 2
    2.1 Capability Mapping
    2.2 Requirements Gathering Data Mapping
    2.3 Requirements Prioritizing

    Phase 3
    3.1 Understanding Product Offerings
    3.2 RFP & Demo Scripts
    3.3 Evaluation Select and Negotiate

    Phase 4
    4.1 Prepare for Implementation

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    In this phase of the project, you will review your RFx and build an initial list of vendors/implementors to reach out to. The final step is to build your evaluation checklist for rating the incoming responses.

    This phase involves the following participants:

    Key stakeholders from the various areas of the business that will support the project including:

    • Evaluation team
    • Vendor management team
    • Project management team
    • Core project team

    Select an Enterprise Application

    Products and vendors demystified

    Knowing who can provide the solution will shorten the selection process and provide the most suitable set of features.

    The Product The Vendor The VAR
    A product is the software, hardware, add-ins, and any value-added services or tools that are bundled together, e.g. SAP Rise (see What is RISE with SAP), SAP S4/HANA, etc. A vendor can carry and sell multiple products or lines of products (e.g. Oracle sells Oracle Fusion and NetSuite, etc.). The Value-added reseller (VAR) can sell a pre-packaged / pre-configured product. VARs are usually partners of the vendor and typically provide other packaged services including system hosting, customization, implementation, and integrations.

    Info-Tech Insight
    Selecting an Enterprise Application is much more than just selecting a software or product; it is selecting a long-term platform and partner to help achieve long-term strategic goals. Refer to our blueprint Select an ERP Implementation Partner.

    Consolidating the vendor shortlist up-front reduces downstream effort

    Put the “short” back in shortlist!

    • Radically reduce effort by narrowing the field of potential vendors earlier in the selection process. Too many organizations don’t funnel their vendor shortlist until near the end of the selection process. The result is wasted time and effort evaluating options that are patently not a good fit.
    • Leverage external data (such as SoftwareReviews) and expert opinion to consolidate your shortlist into a smaller number of viable vendors before the investigative interview stage, and eliminate time spent evaluating dozens of RFP responses.
    • Having fewer RFP responses to evaluate means you will have more time to do greater due diligence.

    Review your use cases to start your shortlist

    Your Info-Tech analysts can help you narrow down the list of vendors that will meet your requirements.

    Next steps will include:

    1. Reviewing your requirements.
    2. Checking out SoftwareReviews.
    3. Creating the RFP.
    4. Conducting demos and detailed proposal reviews.
    5. Selecting and contracting with a finalist!

    Evaluate software category leaders through vendor rankings and awards

    SoftwareReviews

    The Data Quadrant is a thorough evaluation and ranking of all software in an individual category to compare platforms across multiple dimensions.

    Vendors are ranked by their Composite Score, based on individual feature evaluations, user satisfaction rankings, vendor capability comparisons, and likeliness to recommend the platform.

    The Emotional Footprint is a powerful indicator of overall user sentiment toward the relationship with the vendor, capturing data across five dimensions.

    Vendors are ranked by their Customer Experience (CX) Score, which combines the overall Emotional Footprint rating with a measure of the value delivered by the solution.

    Speak with category experts to dive deeper into the vendor landscape

    Fact-based reviews of business software from IT professionals.

    Product and category reports with state-of-the-art data visualization.

    Top-tier data quality backed by a rigorous quality assurance process.

    User-experience insight that reveals the intangibles of working with a vendor.

    SoftwareReviews is powered by Info-Tech.

    Technology coverage is a priority for Info-Tech, and SoftwareReviews provides the most comprehensive unbiased data on today’s technology. The insights of our expert analysts provide unparalleled support to our members at every step of their buying journey.

    CLICK HERE to access SoftwareReviews

    Comprehensive software reviews to make better IT decisions.

    We collect and analyze the most detailed reviews on enterprise software from real users to give you an unprecedented view into the product and vendor before you buy.

    Case Study

    Manufacturer and retailer utilizes Info-Tech for goal of unifying four separate ERP systems

    INDUSTRY
    Manufacturing

    SOURCE
    Info-Tech Consulting

    Challenge Solution Results

    An amalgamation of eight different manufacturing, retail, and supply brands that operated four separate ERP systems and processes across the United States had poor visibility into operations.

    The organization had plans to unify the brands from a systems perspective and accommodate the company’s growth in a scalable and repeatable way.

    Info-Tech was previously engaged to perform an Establish a Concrete ERP Foundation workshop to set the groundwork for the eventual ERP selection.

    The organization engaged Info-Tech’s consulting group to assist in requirements gathering and RFP development.

    Info-Tech consultants traveled to five different states to gather ERP requirements from stakeholders and identify solution requirements.

    Info-Tech developed an ERP requirements matrix from the organization’s processes, including technical requirements and operations/support services.

    Info-Tech matched the organization with a use case and weighted requirements to assist in future scoring.

    An RFP was constructed using the organization’s requirements. and distributed to 10 qualified vendors for completion.

    Strengthen your RFP process with a thorough review

    Drive better sourcing outcomes.

    A quality SOW is the result of a quality RFI/RFP (RFx).

    Use Info-Tech’s RFP Review as a Service to review key items and ensure your RFP will generate quality responses and SOWs.

    • Is it well structured, with a consistent use of fonts and bullets?
    • Is it laid out in sections that are easily identifiable and that progress from high-level to more detailed information?
    • Can a vendor quickly identify the ten (or fewer) things that are most important to you?

    Contact Us

    3.2.1 Prepare the RFP

    1-2 hours

    1. Download Info-Tech’s ERP Request for Proposal Template or prepare internal best-practice RFP tools.
    2. Build your RFP.
      1. Complete the statement of work and general information sections to provide organizational context to your long-listed vendors.
      2. Outline the organization’s procurement instructions for vendors, including due diligence, assessment criteria, and dates.
      3. Input the business requirements document as created in Activity 1.3.1.
      4. Create a scenario overview to provide vendors with an opportunity to give an estimated price.
    3. Obtain approval for your RFP. Each organization has a unique procurement process; follow your own organization’s process as you submit your RFPs to vendors. Ensure compliance with your organization’s standard and gain approval for submitting your RFP.
    Input Output
    • Business requirements document
    • Procurement procedures
    • EAS RFP
    Materials Participants
    • Internal RFP tools/ templates (if available)
    • Info-Tech’s ERP RFP Template (optional)
    • Procurement SMEs
    • Project manager
    • Core project team (optional)

    Download the ERP Request for Proposal Template

    Streamline your evaluation of vendor responses

    Use Info-Tech’s ERP Vendor Response Template to standardize vendor responses.

    • Vendors tend to use their own standard templates when responding, which complicates evaluations.
    • Customize Info-Tech’s ERP Vendor Response Template to adjust for the scope and content of your project; input your organization’s procurement process and ERP requirements.
    • The template is meant to streamline the evaluation of vendor responses by ensuring you achieve comprehensiveness and consistency across all vendor responses. The template requires vendors to prove their organizational viability, understanding of the problem, and tested technology and implementation methodologies.

    Sections of the tool:

    1 Executive Summary

    2 About the Vendor

    3 Understanding of the Challenge

    4 Methodology

    5 Proposed Solution

    6 Project Plan and Timeline

    7 Vendor Qualifications

    8 References

    9 Additional Value-Added Services

    10 Additional Value-Added Goods

    For an explanation of how advanced features are determined, see Information Presentation – Feature Ranks (Stoplights) in the Appendix.

    What to look in vendor responses

    Vendor responses to an RFP can be very revealing about whether their product offering aligns with your EAS roadmap.

    Validate the vendor responses so that there are no misunderstandings with their offer. Here are key items to validate.

    Key items Why is this important?
    About the Vendor This is where the vendor will describe itself and prove its organizational viability.
    Understanding of the Challenge Demonstrating understanding of the problem is the first step in being able to provide a solution.
    Methodology Shows the vendor has a proven methodology to approach and solve the challenge.
    Proposed Solution Describes how the vendor will address the challenge. This is a very important section as it will articulate what you will receive from the vendor as a solution.
    Project Plan and Timeline Provides an overview of the project management methodology, phases of the project, and what will be delivered and when.
    Vendor Qualifications Provides evidence of prior experience with delivering similar projects for similar clients.
    References Provides contact information for individuals or organizations for which the vendor has worked and who can vouch for the experience and success of working with this vendor.
    Value-Added Services and Goods Allows vendors an opportunity to set themselves apart from the competition with additional services and/or goods applicable to your project but not covered elsewhere in the template.

    3.2.2 Build a vendor response template

    1-2 hours

    1. Download Info-Tech’s ERP Vendor Response Template.
    2. Validate that the provided template is comprehensive and will collect the information necessary for your organization to effectively evaluate the product and vendor and will inform a decision to invite the vendor in for a demonstration.
    3. Make the small customizations necessary to tailor the template to your organization (i.e. swap out “[Company X]” for your organization’s name).

    Download the ERP Vendor Response Template

    InputOutput
    • EAS RFP
    • ERP Vendor Response Template
    MaterialsParticipants
    • Info-Tech’s ERP Vendor Response Template
    • Procurement SMEs
    • Project manager
    • Core project team

    3.2.3 Evaluate RFP responses

    Varies

    1. Customize Info-Tech’s EAS RFP and Demonstration Scoring Tool to build a vendor and product evaluation framework for your EAS selection team.
    2. Review all RFP responses together with the core project team and stakeholders from procurement (if necessary).
    3. Input vendor solution information into the EAS RFP and Demonstration Scoring Tool.
    4. Analyze the vendors against your evaluation framework by paying specific attention to costing, overall score, and evaluation notes and comments.
    5. Identify vendors with whom you wish to arrange vendor demonstration.
    6. Contact vendors and arrange briefings.
    InputOutput
    • EAS RFP
    • ERP Vendor Response Template
    MaterialsParticipants
    • Info-Tech’s ERP Vendor Response Template
    • Procurement SMEs
    • Project manager
    • Core project team

    Download the EAS RFP and Demonstration Scoring Tool

    Identify specific use cases and develop demonstration scenarios

    These techniques can be used to gather requirements now and for vendor demos during the evaluation stage.

    Describe use cases to indicate how the various processes will operate. This technique can help end-users describe what the solution must do without needing to know how to describe requirements. Outline scenarios based on these use cases for vendors to demonstrate how their solution can fulfill business requirements.

    Define
    Define objectives for each specific use case.

    Explore
    Explore the various process paths and alternate outcomes for each use case.

    Build
    Build the details of the scenarios to describe the roles of the people involved and the detailed process steps to be accomplished.

    Use
    For each scenario, outline the expected outputs and variations.

    Info-Tech Insight
    Do not exceed three vendors when selecting participants for a product demonstration. Each vendor demonstration should last between one day and one week, depending on the scope of the project. Exceeding the threshold of three vendors can be massively time consuming and yield diminishing returns.

    Conduct vendor demos that extend beyond baseline requirements

    • Demo scripts should focus on differentiating vendor processes and capabilities that contribute to achieving your business’ strategic objectives.
    • You want vendors to show you what differentiates them and what can they do that is specific to your industry.
    • Avoid focusing on baseline EAS capabilities. While this may drive consistency across demonstrations, you will not get a clear picture of how one vendor may align with your unique business needs.
    • Ask the vendor questions pertaining to the differentiating factors listed below. Consider if the differentiating factors are worthwhile over the baseline capabilities shown.
    Adhere to this framework when crafting your scenarios:
    Simple and straightforward Series of steps
    • A straightforward narrative of what you need the product to do.
    • Once written, scenarios should be circulated to key stakeholders in the organization for validation.
    • Demonstrate how a user would interact with the system.
    • Should not be an explanation of specific features/functions.
    Specific Suitable for your business
    • Demonstrate exactly what you need the system to do, but don’t get into implementation details – don’t go too far into the how.
    • Select only critical functions that must be demonstrated.
    • Scenarios should reflect current realities within the organization, while still allowing processes to be improved.

    Add your scenarios to Info-Tech’s sample EAS demo script

    Take a holistic approach to vendor and product evaluation

    Almost – or equally – as important as evaluating vendor feature capabilities is the need to evaluate vendor viability and non-functional aspects of the EAS solution. Include an evaluation of the following criteria in your vendor scoring methodology.

    Vendor capability Description
    Usability and Intuitiveness The degree to which the system interface is easy to use and intuitive to end users.
    Ease of IT Administration The degree to which the IT administrative interface is easy to use and intuitive to IT administrators.
    Ease of Data Integration The relative ease with which the system can be integrated with an organization’s existing application environment including legacy systems, point solutions, and other large enterprise applications.
    Ease of Customization The relative ease with which a system can be customized to accommodate niche or industry-specific business or functional needs.
    Vendor Support Options The availability of vendor support options including selection consulting, application development resources, implementation assistance, and ongoing support resources.
    Availability and Quality of Training The availability of quality training services and materials that will enable users to get the most out of the product selected.
    Product Strategy, Direction, and Rate of Improvement The vendor’s proven ability for constant product improvement, deliberate strategic direction, and overall commitment to research and development efforts in responding to emerging trends.

    Info-Tech Insight
    Evaluating the vendor capabilities, not just product capabilities, is particularly important with EAS solutions. EAS solutions are typically long-term commitments; ensure that your organization is teaming up with a vendor or provider that you feel you can work well with and depend on.

    Case Study

    Structured RFP and demo processes ease the pain of vendor evaluations during the selection phase.

    INDUSTRY
    Automotive

    SOURCE
    Research Interview

    Challenge Solution Results

    This company is one of the largest automotive manufacturers worldwide and has various manufacturing facilities and distribution centers across Canada.

    With over 8,000 employees, the company has a multifaceted health and safety program. While head office enabled and used the health and safety module within the existing HRIS, some divisions within the company found the system complex and were still relying heavily on manual entry spreadsheets for incident investigations. As a result, the company decided to explore other options.

    A project team was created, led by a project manager from head office’s IT department. The team also included health and safety specialists from across the organization, who served as subject matter experts.

    The team put together a project outline, a roadmap for required functionality, and a business case to present to senior leadership, highlighting benefits and potential payback.

    After acquiring executive sponsorship, the team developed a Request for Proposal that was sent to 11 vendors.

    Among the evaluation criteria set in the RFP, injury cost analysis and analytics on safety were identified as the most critical requirements. Based on this criteria, the team narrowed down the options to four RFP responses, which were opened to 16 different sites to ensure consensus across the company.

    The team developed demo scripts to guide the product demonstrations. They also built evaluation scorecards that were used to narrow down the selection to two vendors. Ultimately, the final selection decision came down to how well the vendors’ teams knew the business, and the vendor that demonstrated greater industry expertise was selected.

    3.2.4 Build a demo script for product demonstration evaluation

    1-2 hours

    1. With the EAS selection team, use Info-Tech’s ERP Vendor Demonstration Script, HRIS Vendor Demonstration Script, or CRM Vendor Demonstration Script to write a demo script that reflects your organization’s EAS needs.
    2. Outline the logistics of the demonstration in the Introduction section of the template. Be sure to outline the total length of the demo and the amount of time that should be dedicated to the following:
      1. Product demonstration in response to the demo script.
      2. Showcase of unique product elements, not reflective of the demo script.
      3. Question and answer session.
      4. Breaks and other potential interruptions.
    3. Provide prompts for the vendor to display the capabilities by listing and describing usage scenarios by functional area. For example, when asking a vendor to demonstrate financial and accounting management capabilities, you may break scenarios out by task (e.g. general ledger, accounts payable) or user role (e.g. finance manager, administrator).

    Info-Tech Insight
    Challenge vendor project teams during product demonstrations. Asking the vendor to make adjustments or customizations on the fly will allow you to get an authentic feel for product capability and flexibility and for the degree of adaptability of the vendor project team. Ask the vendor to demonstrate how to do things not listed in your user scenarios, such as change system visualizations or design, change underlying data, add additional data sets, demonstrate collaboration capabilities, or trace an audit trail.

    3.2.4 Build a demo script for product demonstration evaluation

    Before the actual demonstrations, remember to communicate to the team the scenarios to be covered. Distribute the scripts ahead of the demonstrations so that the evaluation team know what is expected from the vendors.

    Input Output
    • Business requirements document
    • Logistical considerations
    • Usage scenarios by functional area
    • EAS demo script
    Materials Participants
    • Info-Tech’s ERP Vendor Demonstration Script, HRIS Vendor Demonstration Script, or CRM Vendor Demonstration Script
    • Business analyst(s)
    • Core project team

    A vendor scoring model provides a clear anchor point for your evaluation of EAS vendors based on a variety of inputs

    A vendor scoring model is a systematic method for effectively assessing competing vendors. A weighted-average scoring model is an approach that strikes a strong balance between rigor and evaluation speed.

    How do I build a scoring model? What are some of the best practices?
    • Start by shortlisting the key criteria you will use to evaluate your vendors. Functional capabilities should always be a critical category, but you’ll also want to look at criteria such as affordability, architectural fit, and vendor viability.
    • Depending on the complexity of the project, you may break down some criteria into sub-categories to assist with evaluation (for example, breaking down functional capabilities into constituent use cases so you can score each one).
    • One you’ve developed the key criteria for your project, the next step is weighting each criteria. Your weightings should reflect the priorities for the project at hand. For example, some projects may put more emphasis on affordability, others on vendor partnership.
    • Using the information collected in the subsequent phases of this blueprint, score each criteria from 1-100, then multiply by the weighting factor. Add up the weighted scores to arrive at the aggregate evaluation score for each vendor on your shortlist.
    • While the criteria for each project may vary, it’s helpful to have an inventory of repeatable criteria that can be used across application selection projects. The next slide contains an example that you can add or subtract from.
    • Don’t go overboard on the number of criteria: five to ten weighted criteria should be the norm for most projects. The more criteria (and sub-criteria) you must score against, the longer it will take to conduct your evaluation. Always remember – link the level of rigor to the size and complexity of your project! It’s possible to create a convoluted scoring model that takes significant time to fill out but yields little additional value.
    • Creation of the scoring model should be a consensus-driven activity between IT, procurement, and the key business stakeholders – it should not be built in isolation. Everyone should agree on the fundamental criteria and weights that are employed.
    • Consider using not just the outputs of investigative interviews and RFP responses to score vendors, but also third-party review services like SoftwareReviews.

    Info-Tech Insight
    Even the best scoring model will still involve some “art” rather than science – scoring categories such as vendor viability always entail a degree of subjective interpretation.

    Establish vendor evaluation criteria

    Vendor demonstrations are an integral part of the selection process. Having clearly defined selection criteria will help with setting up relevant demos and informing the vendor scorecards.

    Vendor evaluation criteria (weight)

    Functionality (30%) Ease of Use (25%)
    • Breadth of capability
    • Tactical capability
    • Operational capability
    • End-user usability
    • Administrative usability
    • UI attractiveness
    • Self-service options
    Cost (15%) Vendor (15%)
    • Maintenance
    • Support
    • Licensing
    • Implementation (internal and external costs)
    • Support model
    • Customer base
    • Sustainability
    • Product roadmap
    • Proof of concept
    • Implementation model
    Technology (15%)
    • Configurability options
    • Customization requirements
    • Deployment options
    • Security and authentication
    • Integration environment
    • Ubiquity of access (mobile)

    Info-Tech Insight
    Do not buy something that does not fit your functional needs just because it is the cheapest. ERP is a massive, long-term investment. If you purchase a system that does not contain the functionality that meets the organization’s business needs, not only will you face issues with user adoption, but you may also face having to revisit your ERP project down the road. In the end, this will cost you more than it will save you.

    Conduct client reference interviews to identify how other organizations have successfully used the vendor’s solution

    Request references from the vendors. Make sure the vendors deliver what they promise.

    Vendors are inevitably going to provide references that will give positive feedback, but don’t be afraid to dig into the interviews to understand some of the limitations related to the solution.

    • Even if a vendor is great for one client doesn’t necessarily mean it will fit for you. Ask the vendor to provide references from organizations in your own or a similar industry or from someone who has automated similar business processes or outlined similar expectations.
    • Use these reference calls as an opportunity to gain a more accurate understanding of the quality of the vendor’s service support and professional services.
    • If you are looking to include a high level of customization in your EAS solution, pay particular attention to this step and the client responses, as these will help you understand how easy a vendor is to work with.
    • Make the most of your client reference interviews by preparing your questions in advance and following a specific script.

    Sample Reference Check Questions

    Use Info-Tech’s Sample Reference Check Questions to provide a framework and starting point for your interviews with a vendor’s previous clients. Review the questions and customize to fit your needs.

    Determine costs of the solution

    Ensure the business case includes both internal and external costs related to the new EAS platform, allocating costs of project managers to improve accuracy of overall costs and level of success.

    EAS solutions include application costs and costs to design processes, install, and configure. These start-up costs can be a significant factor in whether the initial purchase is feasible.

    EAS vendor costs Internal costs
    • Application licensing
    • Implementation and configuration
    • Professional services
    • Maintenance and support
    • Training
    • Third-party add-ons
    • Data transformation
    • Integration
    • Project management
    • Business readiness
    • Change management
    • Resourcing (user groups, design/consulting, testing)
    • Training
    • Auditors (if regulatory requirements need vetting)
    When thinking about vendor costs, also consider the matching internal cost associated with the vendor activity (e.g. data cleansing, internal support). Project management is a top-five critical success factor at all stages of an enterprise application initiative from planning to post-implementation (Information Systems Frontiers). Ensuring that costs for such critical areas are accurately represented will contribute to success.

    Bring in the right resources to guarantee success. Work with the PMO or project manager to get creating the SOW.

    60% of IT projects are not finished “mostly or always” on time (Wellingtone, 2018).

    55% of IT personnel feel that the business objectives of their software projects are clear to them (Geneca, 2017).

    Download the blueprint Improve Your Statements of Work to Hold Your Vendors Accountable to define requirements for installation and configuration.

    3.3.1 Establish your evaluation criteria

    Time required varies

    Customize Info-Tech’s RFP and Demonstration Scoring Tool to build an evaluation framework for vendor responses based on set criteria rather than relative comparisons.

    This tool allows you to evaluate whether your organization’s requirements have been met by the vendor RFP response and provides a location for comprehensive documentation of the RFP response and demonstration details, including costing and availability/quality of product features, architecture, and vendor support.

    Finally, the tool gives you the ability to evaluate your shortlisted vendors’ demonstrations.

    InputOutput
    • Business requirements document
    • Logistical considerations
    • Usage scenarios by functional area
    • EAS evaluation criteria
    MaterialsParticipants
    • Info-Tech’s EAS RFP and Demonstration Scoring Tool
    • Procurement SMEs
    • Core project team

    3.3.1 Establish your evaluation criteria

    Time required varies

    1. With the EAS selection team, brainstorm a list of criteria against which you are going to evaluate each vendor and product.
    2. Categorize each criteria into four to eight groups.
    3. Assign ranked weightings to each category of evaluation criteria. The weightings should add up to 100%. Be sure to identify which criteria are most important to your team by assigning higher weightings to those criteria. If you are having trouble assigning ranked weightings to criteria, take your team through an exercise of ranking pairs. For example, if deciding on the ranked importance of cost, ease of use, and vendor support, break down the discussion by addressing just two criteria at a time: “Between cost and ease of use, which is more important?” If cost is selected… “Between cost and vendor support, which is more important?” If cost is selected again, decide on your second and third rankings by addressing the remaining two criteria… “Between vendor support and ease of use, which is more important?”
    4. Document the final output from this activity as an input to your EAS selection. Optionally, record it in Info-Tech’s EAS RFP and Demonstration Scoring Tool.

    Download the EAS RFP and Demonstration Scoring Tool

    Info-Tech Insight
    Do not reveal your evaluation criteria to vendors. Allowing vendors to see what matters most to your organization may sway their response and/or demo. Avoid this by keeping your decided evaluation criteria and weightings among your selection team only.

    3.3.2 Evaluate vendor product demonstrations

    Time required varies

    1. Using the demonstration script and vendor criteria previously established, customize Info-Tech’s EAS RFP and Demonstration Scoring Tool to build a scorecard that quickly evaluates vendor product demonstrations.
    2. Distribute the scorecard to every member of the team who is evaluating a particular demonstration.
    3. Evaluate each vendor product demonstration using the tool.
    4. Average all scores from each vendor demonstration to inform your selection decision. Note that the vendor with the highest overall score may not necessarily be the best fit for your organization.
    Input Output
    • Demonstration script
    • Evaluation criteria
    • ERP demonstration vendor scores
    Materials Participants
    • Info-Tech’s EAS RFP and Demonstration Scoring Tool
    • Core project team

    Download the EAS RFP and Demonstration Scoring Tool

    Decision Point: Select the Finalist

    After reviewing all vendor responses to your RFP, conducting vendor demos, and running a pilot project (if applicable) – the time has arrived to select your finalist.

    All core selection team members should hold a session to score each shortlisted vendor against the criteria enumerated on the previous slide, based on an in-depth review of proposals, the demo sessions, and any pilots or technical assessments.

    The vendor that scores the highest in aggregate is your finalist.

    Congratulations – you are now ready to proceed to final negotiation and inking a contract. This blueprint provides a detailed approach on the mechanics of a major vendor negotiation.

    Get the best value out from your EAS vendor. Negotiate on your own terms.

    Here are a few tips common to EAS vendors and its offerings.

    Vendors will give time-limited discounts to obtain your buy-in.

    • Depending on your procurement process, it is good practice to have at least two competing vendors in the running to obtain the best value.
    • Make sure that the package offered is coherent – that there are no gaps in the product offering.
    • Ask for access to a higher level of customer care or even developers to obtain quicker, specific support
    • Inquire about specific support and patching service, especially if you have customizations.
    • Ask for additional hours for training and support, pre- and post- implementation.
    • Think long-term – you want to have a good working relationship over the long haul, with a vendor that fits with your overall strategy, and not have to repeat and negotiate often.

    Use Info-Tech’s vendor services

    Info-Tech’s vendor management services has price benchmarks as well knowledgeable advisors who can help evaluate proposals to obtain the best value

    Speak to a vendor management services’ advisor today.

    Contact Us

    Communicate to the vendor whether they were accepted or rejected

    Communicate with each vendor following the demonstration and product evaluation. Ask follow-up questions, highlight areas of concern, and inform them of their status in the selection process.

    The RFP process is a standard business practice. As a customer, you are not under any obligation to educate the vendor as to the details of acceptance or rejection. However, consider every point of contact as an opportunity to build a strong network of potential vendors to help you acquire the best products for your organization.

    Use Info-Tech’s Vendor Communication Set template to communicate with the vendor following the demonstration and product evaluations. This set includes:

    Rejection Notice: Inform the vendor that they are no longer under consideration and highlight opportunities for future debrief.

    Approval Notice: Inform the vendor of its progress to the next stage of selection and identify next steps.

    Go to this link

    Phase 4

    Prepare for Implementation

    Phase 1
    1.1 Enterprise Application Landscape
    1.2 Validate Readiness
    1.3 Determine Resourcing

    Phase 2
    2.1 Capability Mapping
    2.2 Requirements Gathering Data Mapping
    2.3 Requirements Prioritizing

    Phase 3
    3.1 Understanding Product Offerings
    3.2 RFP & Demo Scripts
    3.3 Evaluation Select and Negotiate

    Phase 4
    4.1 Prepare for Implementation

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    Discussion on what it takes to transition to a proper implementation.

    Key stakeholders from the various areas of the business that will support the project including:

    • Project management team
    • Core project team

    Select an Enterprise Application

    Leverage Info-Tech’s research to plan and execute your EAS implementation

    Use Info-Tech Research Group’s three-phase implementation process to guide your own planning.

    Assess

    Prepare

    Govern and course correct

    Establish and execute an end-to-end, agile framework to succeed with the implementation of a major enterprise application.

    Visit this link

    External resources are available for implementations

    Organizations rarely have sufficient internal staffing to resource an EAS project on their own. Consider the options for closing the gap in internal resource availability.

    The most common project resourcing structures for enterprise projects are:

    Your own staff +

    1 Management Consultant

    2 Vendor Consultant

    3 System Integrator

    Consider the following:

    Internal vs. External Roles and Responsibilities

    Clearly delineate between internal and external team responsibilities and accountabilities, and communicate this to your technology partner upfront.

    Internal vs. External Accountabilities

    Accountability is different than responsibility. Your vendor or SI partner may be responsible for completing certain tasks, but be careful not to outsource accountability for the implementation – ultimately, the internal team will be accountable.

    Partner Implementation Methodologies

    Often vendors and/or SIs will have their own preferred implementation methodology. Consider the use of your partner's implementation methodology; however, you know what will work for your organization.

    Info-Tech Insight
    When contemplating a resourcing structure, consider:

    • Availability of in-house implementation competencies and resources.
    • Timeline and constraints.
    • Integration environment complexity.

    Review your options for external resources

    Narrow your search for a management consultant, vendor consultant, or system integrator partner by understanding under which circumstances each would be most appropriate.

    When to choose… Management consultant Vendor consultant System integrators
    • There is an existing and trusted relationship.
    • Scope of work includes consideration of internal IT operations, costing, etc.
    • Organization requires external industry expertise for strategy formulation.
    • They will have a role in overall change management within the enterprise.
    • There are no concerns with overall IT processes or capabilities.
    • The project scope is restricted to a single technology or application.
    • There is minimal integration with other systems.
    • The consultant has no role in business process change.
    • They will be a specialist reporting to other consultants.
    • Project includes products from different vendors or multiple add-ons.
    • Extensive integration is required with legacy or other applications.
    • They will be responsible for outsourced operational support or development following implementation.

    Info-Tech Insight
    Depending on your internal resourcing constraints and IT maturity, you may need to work with multiple partners. If this is the case, just be aware that working with multiple partners can complicate vendor relationship management and makes having a dedicated vendor or partner relationship manager even more important.

    4.1.1 Establish team composition

    1 – 2 hours

    Utilize Info-Tech’s Governance and Management of Enterprise Software Implementation to establish your team composition. Within that blueprint:

    1. Assess the skills necessary for an implementation. Inventory the competencies required for the implementation project team. Map your internal resources to each competency as applicable.
    2. Select your internal implementation team. Determine who needs to be involved closely with the implementation. Key stakeholders should also be considered as members of your implementation team.
    3. Identify the number of external consultants/support required for implementation. Consider your in-house skills, timeline considerations, integration environment complexity, and cost constraints as you make your team composition plan. Be sure to dedicate an internal resource to managing the vendor and partner relationships.
    4. Document the roles and responsibilities, accountabilities, and other expectations of your team as they relate to each step of the implementation.
    Input Output
    • Skills assessment
    • Stakeholder analysis
    • Vendor partner selection
    • Team composition
    Materials Participants
    • Sticky notes
    • Whiteboard
    • Markers
    • Project Team

    Governance and Management of Enterprise Software Implementation

    Follow our iterative methodology with a task list focused on the business must-have functionality to achieve rapid execution and to allow staff to return to their daily work sooner.

    Visit this link

    Ensure your implementation team has a high degree of trust and communication

    If external partners are needed, dedicate an internal resource to managing the vendor and partner relationships.

    Communication Proximity Trust
    Teams must have some type of communication strategy. This can be broken into:
    • Regularity: Having a set time each day to communicate progress and a set day to conduct retrospectives.
    • Ceremonies: Injecting awards and continually emphasizing delivery of value can encourage relationship building and constructive motivation.
    • Escalation: Voicing any concerns and having someone responsible for addressing those concerns.
    Distributed teams create complexity as communication can break down. This can be mitigated by:
    • Location: Placing teams in proximity can close the barrier of geographical distance and time zone differences.
    • Inclusion: Making a deliberate attempt to pull remote team members into discussions and ceremonies.
    • Communication tools: Having the right technology (e.g. video conference) can help bring teams closer together virtually.
    Members should trust that other members are contributing to the project and completing their required tasks on time. Trust can be developed and maintained by:
    • Accountability: Having frequent quality reviews and feedback sessions. As work becomes more transparent, people become more accountable.
    • Role clarity: Having a clear definition of what everyone’s role is.

    Create a formal communication process throughout the EAS implementation

    Establish a comprehensive communication process around the EAS enterprise roll-out to ensure that end users stay informed.

    The EAS kick-off meeting(s) should encompass:

    • Target business-user requirements
    • Target quality of service (QoS) metrics
    • Other IT department needs
    • Special consideration needs
    • Tangible business benefits of application
    • The high-level application overview

    The overall objective for inter-departmental EAS kick-off meetings is to confirm that all parties agree on certain key points and understand platform rationale and functionality.

    The kick-off process will significantly improve internal communications by inviting all affected internal IT groups, including business units, to work together to address significant issues before the application process is formally activated.

    Department groups or designated trainers should take the lead and implement a process for:

    • Scheduling EAS platform roll-out/kick-off meetings.
    • Soliciting preliminary input from the attending groups to develop further training plans.
    • Establishing communication paths and the key communication agents from each department who are responsible for keeping lines open moving forward.

    Plan for your implementation of EAS based on deployment model

    Place your EAS solution into your IT landscape by configuring and adjusting the tool based on your specific deployment method.

    On-Premises SaaS-based
    1. Identify custom features and configuration items
    2. Train developers and IT staff on new software investment
    3. Install software
    4. Configure software
    5. Test installation and configuration
    6. Test functionality
    1. Train developers and IT staff on new software investment
    2. Set up connectivity
    3. Identify VPN or internal solution
    4. Check firewalls
    5. Validate bandwidth regulations

    Integration is a top IT challenge and critical to the success of the EAS solution

    EAS solutions are most effective when they are integrated with ERP, HRIS, and CRM solutions.

    Data interchange between the EAS solution and other data sources is necessary Formulate a comprehensive map of the systems, hardware, and software with which the EAS solution must be able to integrate. Master data needs to constantly be synchronized; without this, you lose out on one of the primary benefits of integration. These connections should be bidirectional for maximum value (i.e. marketing data to the CRM, customer data to MMS).
    Specialized projects that include an intricate prospect or customer list and complex rules may need to be built by IT The more custom fields you have in your EAS and point solutions, the more schema mapping you will have to do. Include this information in the RFP to receive guidance from vendors regarding the ease with which integration can be achieved.
    Pay attention to legacy apps and databases If you have a legacy EAS and databases, more custom code will be required. Many vendors claim that custom integrations can be performed for most systems, but custom comes at a cost. Don’t just ask if they can integrate; ask how long it will take and for references from organizations which have been successful in this.

    Scenario: Failure to address EAS data integration will cost you in the long run

    A company spent $15 million implementing a new CRM system in the cloud and decided NOT to spend an additional $1.5 million to do a proper cloud DI tool procurement. The mounting costs followed.

    Cost element – Custom Data Integration $
    2 FTEs for double entry of sales order data $ 100,000/year
    One-time migration of product data to CRM $ 240,000 otc
    Product data maintenance $ 60,000/year
    Customer data synchronization interface build $ 60,000 otc
    Customer data interface maintenance $ 10,000/year
    Data quality issues $ 100,000/year
    New SaaS integration built in year 3 $ 300,000 otc
    New SaaS integration maintenance $ 150,000/year
    Cost element – Data Integration Tool $
    DI strategy and platform implementation $1,500,000 otc
    DI tool maintenance $ 15,000/year
    New SaaS integration point in year 3 $ 300,000 otc

    Comparison of Solution TCOs Chart

    Custom integration is costing this organization $300,000/year for one SaaS solution.

    The proposed integration solution would have paid for itself in 3-4 years and saved exponential costs in the long run.

    Proactively address data quality in the EAS during implementation

    Data quality is a make-or-break issue in an EAS platform; garbage in is garbage out.

    • EAS solutions are one of the leading offenders for generating poor quality data. As such, it’s important to have a plan in place for structuring your data architecture in such a way that poor data quality is minimized from the get-go.
    • Having a plan for data quality should precede data migration efforts; some types of poor data quality can be mitigated prior to migration.
    • There are five main types of poor-quality data found in EAS platforms.
      • Duplicate data: Duplicate records can be a major issue. Leverage dedicated de-dupe tools to eliminate them.
      • Stale data: Out-of-date customer information can reduce the usefulness of the platform. Use automated social listening tools to help keep data fresh.
      • Incomplete data: Records with missing info limit platform value. Specify data validation parameters to mandate that all fields are filled in.
      • Invalid and conflicting data: Can create cascading errors. Establishing conflict resolution rules in ETL tools for data integration can reduce issues.

    Info-Tech Insight
    If you have a complex EAS environment, appoint data stewards for each major domain and procure a de-dupe tool. As the complexity of EAS system-to-system integrations increase, so will the chance that data quality errors will crop up – for example, bi-directional POI with other sources of customer information dramatically increase the chances of conflicting/duplicate data.

    Profile data, eliminate dead weight, and enforce standards to protect data

    Identify and eliminate dead weight Poor data can originate in the firm’s EAS system. Custom queries, stored procedures, or profiling tools can be used to assess the key problem areas.
    Loose rules in the EAS system lead to records of no significant value in the database. Those rules need to be fixed, but if changes are made before the data is fixed, users could encounter database or application errors, which will reduce user confidence in the system.
    • Conduct a data flow analysis: map the path that data takes through the organization.
    • Use a mass cleanup to identify and destroy dead weight data. Merge duplicates either manually or with the aid of software tools. Delete incomplete data, taking care to reassign related data.
    • COTS packages typically allow power users to merge records without creating orphaned records in related tables, but custom-built applications typically require IT expertise.
    Create and enforce standards and policies Now that the data has been cleaned, it’s important to protect the system from relapsing.
    Work with business users to find out what types of data require validation and which fields should have changes audited. Whenever possible, implement drop-down lists to standardize values and make programming changes to ensure that truncation ceases.
    • Truncated data is usually caused by mismatches in data structures during either one-time data loads or ongoing data integrations.
    • Don’t go overboard on assigning required fields; users will just put key data in note fields.
    • Discourage the use of unstructured note fields: the data is effectively lost except if it gets subpoenaed.

    Info-Tech Insight
    Data quality concerns proliferate with the customization level of your platform. The more extensive the custom integration points and module/database extensions that you have made, the more you will need to have a plan in place for managing data quality from a reactive and proactive standpoint.

    Ensure requirements are met with robust user acceptance testing

    User acceptance testing (UAT) is a test procedure that helps to ensure end-user requirements are met. Test cases can reveal bugs before the suite is implemented.

    Five secrets of UAT success

    1 Create the plan With the information collected from requirements gathering, create the plan. Make sure this information is added to the main project plan documentation.
    2 Set the agenda The time allotted will vary depending on the functionality being tested. Ensure that the test schedule allows for the resolution of issues and discussion.
    3 Determine who will participate Work with relevant stakeholders to identify the people who can best contribute to system testing. Look for experienced power users who have been involved in earlier decision making about the system.
    4 Highlight acceptance criteria With the UAT group, pinpoint the criteria to determine system acceptability. Refer to requirements specified in use cases in the initial requirements-gathering stages of the project.
    5 Collect end user feedback Weaknesses in resolution workflow design, technical architecture, and existing customer service processes can be highlighted and improved with ongoing surveys and targeted interviews.

    Calculate post-deployment metrics to assess measurable value of the project

    Track the post-deployment results from the project and compare the metrics to the current state and target state.

    EAS selection and implementation metrics
    Description Formula Current or estimated Target Post-deployment
    End-user satisfaction # of satisfied users
    # of end users
    70% 90% 85%
    Percentage over/under estimated budget Amount spent – 100%
    Budget
    5% 0% 2%
    Percentage over/under estimated timeline Project length – 100%
    Estimated timeline
    10% -5% -10%
    EAS strategy metrics
    Description Formula Current or estimated Target Post-deployment
    Number of leads generated (per month) # of leads generated 150 200 250
    Average time to resolution (in minutes) Time spent on resolution
    # of resolutions
    30 minutes 10 minutes 15 minutes
    Cost per interaction by campaign Total campaign spending
    # of customer interactions
    $17.00 $12.00 $12.00

    Continue to adapt your governance model

    Your EAS and applications environment will continue to evolve. Make sure your governance model is always ready to capture the everchanging needs.

    Business needs will not stop changing whether you have an ongoing EAS or other application project. It is thus important to keep your governance efficient and streamlined to capture these needs to then make the EAS continue deliver value and remain aligned to long-term corporate objectives.

    Visit this link

    Summary of Accomplishment

    Select an Enterprise Application

    EAS technology is critical to facilitating an organization’s flow of information across business units. It allows for seamless integration of systems and creates a holistic view of the enterprise to support decision making. Having a structured approach to gathering the necessary resources, defining key requirements, and engaging with the right shortlist of vendors to pick the best finalist is crucial.

    This selection guide allows organizations to execute a structured methodology for picking an EAS that aligns with their needs. This includes:

    • Alignment and prioritization of key business and technology drivers for an EAS selection.
    • Identification and prioritization of the EAS requirements.
    • Construction of a robust EAS RFP.
    • A strong market scan of key players.
    • A survey of crucial implementation considerations.

    This formal EAS selection initiative will drive business-IT alignment, identify data and integration priorities, and allow for the rollout of a platform that’s highly likely to satisfy all stakeholder needs.

    If you would like additional support, have our analysts guide you through other phases as part of an Info-Tech workshop.

    Contact your account representative for more information.
    workshops@infotech.com
    1-888-670-8889

    Research Contributors

    Name Title Organization
    Anonymous Anonymous Telecommunications industry
    Anonymous Anonymous Construction material industry
    Anonymous Anonymous Automotive industry
    Corey Tenenbaum Head of IT Taiga Motors
    Mark Earley Director, Consulting Info-Tech Research Group
    Ricardo di Olivera Research Director, Enterprise Applications Info-Tech Research Group

    Bibliography

    “2016 Report on ERP Systems and Enterprise Software.” Panorama Consulting Solutions, 2016. Web.

    “2018 Report on ERP Systems and Enterprise Software.” Panorama Consulting Solutions, 2018. Web.

    “2022 HRIS Software Report.” SoftwarePath, 2022 . Web

    Cross-Industry Process Classification Framework (PCF) Version 7.2.1. APQC, 26 Sept. 2019. Web.

    “Doomed From the Start? Why a Majority of Business and IT Teams Anticipate Their Software Development Projects Will Fail.” Geneca, 25 Jan. 2017. Web.

    Farhan, Marwa Salah, et al. “A Systematic Review for the Determination and Classification of the CRM Critical Success Factors Supporting with Their Metrics.” Future Computing and Informatics Journal, vol. 3, no. 2, Dec. 2018, pp. 398–416.

    Gheorghiu, Gabriel. “ERP Buyer’s Profile for Growing Companies.” SelectHub, 23 Sept. 2022. Web

    “Process Frameworks.” APQC, 4 Nov. 2020. Web.

    “Process vs. Capability: Understanding the Difference.” APCQ, 2017. Web.

    Savolainen, Juha, et al. “Transitioning from Product Line Requirements to Product Line Architecture.” 29th Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC'05), IEEE, vol. 1, 2005, pp. 186-195, doi: 10.1109/COMPSAC.2005.160

    Saxena, Deepak, and Joe McDonagh. "Evaluating ERP Implementations: The Case for a Lifecycle based Interpretive Approach." Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation 22.1 (2019): pp29-37.

    “SOA Reference Architecture – Capabilities and the SOA RA.” The Open Group, TOGAF, n.d. Web.

    Smith, Anthony. “How To Create A Customer-Obsessed Company Like Netflix.” Forbes, 12 Dec. 2017. Web.

    "The Moscow Method", MindTools. Web.

    “The State of CRM Data Management 2020.” Validity, 2020. Web.

    “The State of Project Management Annual Survey 2018.” Wellingtone, 2018. Web.

    “Why HR Projects Fail.” Unleash, 2021. Web

    Map Technical Skills for a Changing Infrastructure & Operations Organization

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}333|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 10.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: 5 Average Days Saved
    • member rating average days saved: After each Info-Tech experience, we ask our members to quantify the real-time savings, monetary impact, and project improvements our research helped them achieve.
    • Parent Category Name: Strategy and Organizational Design
    • Parent Category Link: /strategy-and-organizational-design
    • Infrastructure & Operations is changing rapidly. It’s a constant challenge to find the right skills to support the next new technology while at the same time maintaining the skills in house that allow you to support your existing platforms.
    • A lack of clarity around required skills makes finding the right skills difficult, and it’s not clear whether you should train, hire, contract, or outsource to address gaps.
    • You need to keep up with changes and new strategy while continuing to support your existing environment.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Take a strategic approach to acquiring skills – looking only as far as the needs of the next project will lead to a constant skills shortage with no plan for it to be addressed.
    • Begin by identifying your future state. Identify needed skills in the organization to support planned projects and initiatives, and to mitigate skills-related risks.

    Impact and Result

    • Leverage your infrastructure roadmap and cloud strategy to identify needed skills in your future state environment.
    • Decide how you’ll acquire needed skills based on the characteristics of need for each skill.
    • Communicate the change and create a plan of action for the skills transformation.

    Map Technical Skills for a Changing Infrastructure & Operations Organization Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should map technical skills for a changing Infrastructure & Operations organization, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Identify skills needs for the future state environment

    Identify what skills are needed based on where the organization is going.

    • Map Technical Skills for a Changing Infrastructure & Operations Organization – Phase 1: Identify Skills Needs for Your Future State Environment
    • Future State Playbook
    • IT/Cloud Solutions Architect
    • IT/Cloud Engineer
    • IT/Cloud Administrator
    • IT/Cloud Demand Billing & Accounting Analyst

    2. Acquire needed skills

    Ground skills acquisition decisions in the characteristics of need.

    • Map Technical Skills for a Changing Infrastructure & Operations Organization – Phase 2: Acquire Needed Skills
    • Technical Skills Map

    3. Maximize the value of the skills map

    Get stakeholder buy-in; leverage the skills map in other processes.

    • Map Technical Skills for a Changing Infrastructure & Operations Organization – Phase 3: Maximize the Value of Your Skills Map
    • Technical Skills Map Communication Deck Template
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Map Technical Skills for a Changing Infrastructure & Operations Organization

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Review Initiatives and Skills-Related Risks

    The Purpose

    Identify process and skills changes required by the future state of your environment.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Set foundation for alignment between strategy-defined technology initiatives and needed skills.

    Activities

    1.1 Review the list of initiatives and projects with the group.

    1.2 Identify how key support, operational, and deployment processes will change through planned initiatives.

    1.3 Identify skills-related risks and pain points.

    Outputs

    Future State Playbook

    2 Identify Needed Skills and Roles

    The Purpose

    Identify process and skills changes required by the future state of your environment.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Set foundation for alignment between strategy-defined technology initiatives and needed skills.

    Activities

    2.1 Identify skills required to support the new environment.

    2.2 Map required skills to roles.

    Outputs

    IT/Cloud Architect Role Description

    IT/Cloud Engineer Role Description

    IT/Cloud Administrator Role Description

    3 Create a Plan to Acquire Needed Skills

    The Purpose

    Create a skills acquisition strategy based on the characteristics of need.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Optimal skills acquisition strategy defined.

    Activities

    3.1 Modify impact scoring scale for key skills decision factors.

    3.2 Apply impact scoring scales to needed skills

    3.3 Decide whether to train, hire, contract, or outsource to acquire needed skills.

    Outputs

    Technical Skills Map

    4 Develop a Communication Plan

    The Purpose

    Create an effective communication plan for different stakeholders across the organization.

    Identify opportunities to leverage the skills map elsewhere.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Create a concise, clear, consistent, and relevant change message for stakeholders across the organization.

    Activities

    4.1 Review skills decisions and decide how you will acquire skills in each role.

    4.2 Update roles descriptions.

    4.3 Create a change message.

    4.4 Identify opportunities to leverage the skills map in other processes.

    Outputs

    Technical Skills Map Communication Deck

    Improve Application Development Throughput

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}151|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 10.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $59,399 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 39 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Development
    • Parent Category Link: /development
    • The business is demanding more features at an increasing pace. It is expecting your development teams to keep up with its changing needs while maintaining high quality.
    • However, your development process is broken. Tasks are taking significant time to complete, and development handoffs are not smooth.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Lean development is independent of your software development lifecycle (SDLC) methodology. Lean development practices can be used in both Agile and Waterfall teams.
    • Lean isn’t about getting rid of sound development processes. Becoming lean means fine-tuning the integration of core practices like coding and testing.
    • Lean thinking motivates automation. By focusing on optimizing the development process, automation becomes a logical and necessary step toward greater maturity and improved throughput.

    Impact and Result

    • Gain a deep understanding of lean principles and associated behaviors. Become familiar with the core lean principles and the critical attitudes and mindsets required by lean. Understand how incorporating DevOps and Agile principles can help your organization.
    • Conduct a development process and tool review. Use a value-stream analysis of your current development process and tools to reveal bottlenecks and time-consuming or wasteful tasks. Analyze these insights to identify root causes and the impact to product delivery.
    • Incorporate the right tools and practices to become more lean. Optimize the key areas where you are experiencing the most pain and consuming the most resources. Look at how today’s best development and testing practices (e.g. version control, branching) and tools (e.g. automation, continuous integration) can improve the throughput of your delivery pipeline.

    Improve Application Development Throughput Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should make development teams leaner, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Conduct a current state analysis

    Acquire a holistic perspective of the development team, process, and tools to identify the bottlenecks and inefficiency points that are significantly delaying releases.

    • Improve Application Development Throughput – Phase 1: Conduct a Current State Analysis
    • Lean Implementation Roadmap Template
    • Lean Development Readiness Assessment

    2. Define the lean future state

    Identify the development guiding principles and artifact management practices and build automation and continuous integration processes and tools that best fit the context and address the organization’s needs.

    • Improve Application Development Throughput – Phase 2: Define the Lean Future State

    3. Create an implementation roadmap

    Prioritize lean implementation initiatives in a gradual, phased approach and map the critical stakeholders in the lean transformation.

    • Improve Application Development Throughput – Phase 3: Create an Implementation Roadmap
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Improve Application Development Throughput

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Conduct a Current State Analysis

    The Purpose

    Assess the current state of your development environment.

    Select a pilot project to demonstrate the value of your optimization.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Realization of the root causes behind the bottlenecks and inefficiencies in your current development process.

    Valuation of your current development tools.

    Selection of a pilot project that will be used to gather the metrics in order obtain buy-in for wider optimization initiatives.

    Activities

    1.1 Assess your readiness to transition to lean development.

    1.2 Conduct a SWOT analysis and value-stream assessment of your current development process.

    1.3 Evaluate your development tools.

    1.4 Select a pilot project.

    Outputs

    Lean development readiness assessment

    Current state analysis of development process

    Value assessment of existing development tools

    Pilot project selection

    2 Define Your Lean Future State

    The Purpose

    Establish your development guiding principles.

    Enhance the versioning and management of your development artifacts.

    Automatically build and continuously integrate your code.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Grounded and well-understood set of guiding principles that are mapped to development tasks and initiatives.

    Version control strategy of development artifacts, including source code, adapted to support lean development.

    A tailored approach to establish the right environment to support automated build, testing, and continuous integration tools.

    Activities

    2.1 Assess your alignment to the lean principles.

    2.2 Define your lean development guiding principles.

    2.3 Define your source code branching approach.

    2.4 Define your build automation approach.

    2.5 Define your continuous integration approach.

    Outputs

    Level of alignment to lean principles

    Development guiding principles

    Source code branching approach

    Build automation approach.

    Continuous integration approach

    3 Create Your Implementation Roadmap

    The Purpose

    Prioritize your optimization initiatives to build an implementation roadmap.

    Identify the stakeholders of your lean transformation.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Phased implementation roadmap that accommodates your current priorities, constraints, and enablers.

    Stakeholder engagement strategy to effectively demonstrate the value of the optimized development environment.

    Activities

    3.1 Identify metrics to gauge the success of your lean transformation.

    3.2 List and prioritize your implementation steps.

    3.3 Identify the stakeholders of your lean transformation.

    Outputs

    List of product, process, and tool metrics

    Prioritized list of tasks to optimize your development environment

    Identification of key stakeholders

    Plan Your Digital Transformation on a Page

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}81|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 8.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $34,649 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 20 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: IT Strategy
    • Parent Category Link: /it-strategy
    • Digital investments often under deliver on expectations of return, and there is no cohesive approach to managing the flow of capital into digital.
    • The focus of the business has historically been to survive technological disruption rather than to thrive in it.
    • Strategy is based mostly on opinion rather than an objective analysis of the outcomes customers want from the organization.
    • Digital is considered a buzzword – nobody has a clear understanding of what it is and what it means in the organization’s context.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • The purpose of going digital is getting one step closer to the customer. The mark of a digital organization lies in how they answer the question, “How does what we’re doing contribute to what the customer wants from us?”
    • The goal of digital strategy is digital enablement. An organization that is digitally enabled no longer needs a digital strategy, it’s just “the strategy.”

    Impact and Result

    • Focus strategy making on delivering the digital outcomes that customers want.
      • Leverage the talent, expertise, and perspectives within the organization to build a customer-centric digital strategy.
    • Design a balanced digital strategy that creates value across the five digital value pools:
      • Digital marketing, digital channels, digital products, digital supporting capabilities, and business model innovation.
    • Ask how disruption can be leveraged, or even become the disruptor.
      • Manage disruption through quick-win approaches and empowering staff to innovate.
    • Use a Digital Strategy-on-a-Page to spark the digital transformation.
      • Drive awareness and alignment on the digital vision and spark your organization’s imagination around digital.

    Plan Your Digital Transformation on a Page Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to understand how digital disruption is driving the need for transformation, and how Info-Tech’s methodology can help.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Scope the digital transformation

    Learn how to apply the Digital Value Pools thought model and scope strategy around them.

    • Plan Your Digital Transformation on a Page – Phase 1: Scope the Digital Transformation

    2. Design the digital future state vision

    Identify business imperatives, define digital outcomes, and define the strategy’s guiding principles.

    • Plan Your Digital Transformation on a Page – Phase 2: Design the Digital Future State Vision
    • Digital Strategy on a Page

    3. Define the digital roadmap

    Define, prioritize, and roadmap digital initiatives and plan contingencies.

    • Plan Your Digital Transformation on a Page – Phase 3: Define the Digital Roadmap

    4. Sustain digital transformation

    Create, polish, and socialize the Digital Strategy-on-a-Page.

    • Plan Your Digital Transformation on a Page – Phase 4: Sustain Digital Transformation
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Plan Your Digital Transformation on a Page

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Scope the Digital Transformation

    The Purpose

    Identify the need for and use of digital strategy and determine a realistic scope for the digital strategy.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    The digital strategy project is planned and scoped around a subset of the five digital value pools.

    Activities

    1.1 Introduction to digital strategy.

    1.2 Establish motivation for digital.

    1.3 Discuss in-flight digital investments.

    1.4 Define the scope of digital.

    1.5 Identify stakeholders.

    1.6 Perform discovery interviews.

    1.7 Select two value pools to focus day 2, 3, and 4 activities.

    Outputs

    Business model canvas

    Stakeholder power map

    Discovery interview results

    Two value pools for focus throughout the workshop

    2 Design the Digital Future State Vision

    The Purpose

    Create guiding principles to help define future digital initiatives. Generate the target state with the help of strategic goals.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Establish the basis for planning out the initiatives needed to achieve the target state from the current state.

    Activities

    2.1 Identify digital imperatives.

    2.2 Define key digital outcomes.

    2.3 Create a digital investment thesis.

    2.4 Define digital guiding principles.

    Outputs

    Corporate strategy analysis, PESTLE analysis, documented operational pain points (value streams)

    Customer needs assessment (journey maps)

    Digital investment thesis

    Digital guiding principles

    3 Define the Digital Roadmap

    The Purpose

    Understand the gap between the current and target state. Create transition options and assessment against qualitative and quantitative metrics to generate a list of initiatives the organization will pursue to reach the target state. Build a roadmap to plan out when each transition initiative will be implemented.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Finalize the initiatives the organization will use to achieve the target digital state. Create a roadmap to plan out the timing of each initiative and generate an easy-to-present document for digital strategy approval.

    Activities

    3.1 Identify initiatives to achieve digital outcomes.

    3.2 Align in-flight initiatives to digital initiatives.

    3.3 Prioritize digital initiatives.

    3.4 Document architecturally significant requirements for high-priority initiatives.

    Outputs

    Digital outcomes and KPIs

    Investment/value pool matrix

    Digital initiative prioritization

    Architecturally significant requirements for high-priority initiatives

    4 Define the Digital Roadmap

    The Purpose

    Plan your approach to socializing the digital strategy to help facilitate the cultural changes necessary for digital transformation.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Plant the seed of digital and innovation to start making digital a part of the organization’s DNA.

    Activities

    4.1 Review and refine Digital Strategy on a Page.

    4.2 Assess company culture.

    4.3 Define high-level cultural changes needed for successful transformation.

    4.4 Define the role of the digital transformation team.

    4.5 Establish digital transformation team membership and desired outcomes.

    Outputs

    Digital Strategy on a Page

    Strategyzer Culture Map

    Digital transformation team charter

    Build a More Effective Go-to-Market Strategy

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}559|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Marketing Solutions
    • Parent Category Link: /marketing-solutions
    • A weak or poorly defined Go-to-Market strategy is often the root cause of slow product revenue growth or missed product revenue targets.
    • Many agile-driven product teams rush to release, skipping key GTM steps leaving Sales and Marketing misaligned and not ready to fully monetize precious product investments.
    • Guessing at buyer persona and journey or competitive SWOT analyses – two key deliverables of an effective GTM strategy – cause poor marketing and sales outcomes.
    • Without the sales and product-aligned business case for launch called for in a successful GTM strategy, companies see low buyer adoption, wasted sales and marketing investments, and a failure to claim product and launch campaign success.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Having an updated and compelling Go-to-Market strategy is a critical capability – as important as financial strategy, sales operations, and even corporate business development, given its huge impact on the many drivers of sustainable growth.
    • Establishing alignment through the GTM process builds long-term operational strength.
    • With a sound GTM strategy, marketers give themselves a 50% greater chance of product launch success.

    Impact and Result

    • Align stakeholders on a common vision and execution plan prior to the Build and Launch phases.
    • Build a foundation of buyer and competitive understanding to drive a successful product hypothesis, then validate with buyers.
    • Deliver a team-aligned launch plan that enables launch readiness and outlines commercial success.

    Build a More Effective Go-to-Market Strategy Research & Tools

    Build Your Go-to-Market Strategy

    Use this storyboard and its deliverables to build a baseline market, understand your buyer, and gain competitive insights. It will also help you design your initial product and business case, and align stakeholder plans to prep for build.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    • Build a More Effective Go-to-Market Strategy – Executive Brief

      Almost there!

      Please enter your email and a few details and you're on your way to an efficient process.

      Download ×
    • Build a More Effective Go-to-Market Strategy – Phases 1-3
    • Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation Template
    • Go-to-Market Strategy RACI and Launch Checklist Workbook
    • Product Market Opportunity Sizing Workbook
    • Go-to-Market Strategy Cost Budget and Revenue Forecast Workbook

    Infographic

    Workshop: Build a More Effective Go-to-Market Strategy

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Align on GTM Vision & Plan, Craft Initial Strategy

    The Purpose

    Align on GTM vision and plan; craft initial strategy.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Confidence that market opportunity is sufficient.

    Deeper buyer understanding to drive product design and messaging and launch campaign asset design.

    Steering committee approval for next phase.

    Activities

    1.1 Outline a vision for GTM, roles required, identify Steering Committee lead, workstream leads, and teams.

    1.2 Capture GTM strategy hypothesis by working through initial draft of the Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation and business case.

    1.3 Capture team knowledge on buyer persona and journey and competitive SWOT.

    1.4 Identify info./data gaps, sources, and plan for capturing/gathering including buyer interviews.

    Outputs

    Documented Steering Committee and Working team.

    Aligned on GTM vision and process.

    Documented buyer persona and journey. Competitive SWOT analysis.

    Document team knowledge on initial GTM strategy, buyer personas, and business case.

    2 Identify Initial Business Case, Sales Forecast, and Launch Plan

    The Purpose

    Identify Initial Business Case, Sales Forecast, and Launch Plan.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Confidence in size of market opportunity.

    Alignment of Sales and Product on product forecast.

    Assessment of marketing tech stack.

    Initial business case.

    Activities

    2.1 Size Product Market Opportunity and initial revenue forecast.

    2.2 Craft initial product hypothesis from buyer interviews including feature priorities, pricing, packaging, competitive differentiation, channel/route to market.

    2.3 Craft initial launch campaign, product release and sales and CX readiness plans.

    2.4 Identify launch budgets across each investment area.

    2.5 Discuss initial product launch business case and key activities.

    Outputs

    Product Serviceable Obtainable Market (SOM), Serviceable Available Market (SAM) and Total Available Market (TAM).

    Definition of product-market fit, uniqueness, and competitive differentiation.

    Preliminary campaign, targets, and readiness plans.

    Incremental budgets for each key stakeholder area.

    Preliminary product launch business case.

    3 Develop Launch Plans (I of II)

    The Purpose

    Develop final Launch plans and budgets in product and marketing.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Align Product release/launch plans with the marketing campaign for launch.

    Understand incremental budgets from product and marketing for launch.

    Activities

    3.1 Apply product interviews to scope, MVP, roadmap, competitive differentiation, pricing, feature prioritization, routes to market, and sales forecast.

    3.2 Develop a more detailed launch campaign plan complete with asset-types, messaging, digital plan to support buyer journey, media buy plan and campaign metrics.

    Outputs

    Minimally Viable Product defined with feature prioritization. Product competitive differentiation documented Routes to market identified Sales forecast aligned with product team expectations.

    Marketing campaign launch plan Content marketing asset-creation/acquisition plan Campaign targets and metrics.

    4 Develop Launch Plans (II of II)

    The Purpose

    Develop final Launch Plans and budgets for remaining areas.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Align Product release/launch plans with the marketing campaign for launch.

    Understand incremental budgets from Product and Marketing for launch.

    Activities

    4.1 Develop detailed launch/readiness plans with final budgets for: Sales enablement , Sales training, Tech stack, Customer onboarding & success, Product marketing, AR, PR, Corp Comms/Internal Comms, Customer Events, Employee Events, etc.

    Outputs

    Detailed launch plans, budgets for Product Marketing, Sales, Customer Success, and AR/PR/Corp. Comms.

    5 Present Final Business Case

    The Purpose

    To gain approval to move to Build and Launch phases.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Align business case with Steering Committee expectations

    Approvals to Build and Launch targeted offering

    Activities

    5.1 Review final launch/readiness plans with final budgets for all key areas.

    5.2 Move all key findings into Steering Committee presentation slides.

    5.3 Present to Steering Committee; receive feedback.

    5.4 Incorporate Steering Committee feedback; update finial business case.

    Outputs

    Combined budgets across all areas. Final launch/readiness plans.

    Final Steering Committee-facing slides.

    Final approvals for Build and Launch.

    Further reading

    Build a More Effective Go-to-Market Strategy

    Maximize GTM success through deeper market and buyer understanding and competitive differentiation and launch team readiness that delivers target revenues.

    Table of Contents

    Section Title
    1 Executive Brief
    • Executive Summary
    • Analyst Perspective
    • Go-to-Market (GTM) strategy critical success factors
    • Key GTM challenges
    • Essential deliverables for GTM success
    • Benefits of a more effective GTM Strategy
    • Our methodology to support your success
    • Insight Summary
    • Blueprint deliverables and guided implementation steps
    2 Build baseline market, buyer, and competitive insights
    • Establish your team
    • Build buyer personas and journeys – develop initial messaging
    • Build initial product hypothesis
    • Size product market opportunity
    • Outline your key tech, app, and digital requirements
    • Develop your competitive differentiation
    • Select routes to market
    3 Design initial product and business case
    • Branding check
    • Formulate packaging and pricing
    • Craft buyer-valid product concept
    • Build campaign plan and targets
    • Develop budgets for creative, content, and media purchases
    • Draft product business case
    • Update GTM Strategy deck
    4 Align stakeholder plans to prep for build
    • Assess tech/tools support for all GTM phases
    • Outline sales enablement and customer success plan
    • Build awareness plan
    • Finalize business case
    • Final GTM plan deck

    Executive Brief

    Analyst Perspective

    Go-to-Market Strategy.

    A successful go-to-market (GTM) strategy aligns marketing, product, sales and customer success, sees decision making based on deep buyer understanding, and tests many basic assumptions often overlooked in today’s agile-driven product development/management environment.

    The disciplines you build using our methodology will not only support your team’s effort building and launching more successful products, but also can be modified for use in other strategic initiatives such as branding, M&A integration, expanding into new markets, and other initiatives that require a cross-functional and multidisciplined process.

    Photo of Jeff Golterman, Managing Director, SoftwareReviews Advisory.

    Jeff Golterman
    Managing Director
    SoftwareReviews Advisory

    Executive Summary

    An ineffective go-to-market strategy is often a root cause of:
    • Failure to attain new product revenue targets.
    • A loss of customer focus and poor new product/feature release buyer adoption.
    • Product releases misaligned with marketing, sales, and customer success readiness.
    • Low win rates compared to key competitors’.
    • Low contact-to-lead conversion rates.
    • Loss of executive/investor support for further new product development and marketing investments.
    Hurdles to go-to-market success include:
    • An unclear product-market opportunity.
    • A lack of well defined and prioritized buyer personas and needs that are well understood.
    • Poor competitive analysis that fails to pinpoint key areas of competitive differentiation.
    • Guessing at buyer journey and buyer-described ideal engagement within your lead gen engine.
    • A business case that calls for levels of customer value delivery (vs. feature MVPs) that can actually deliver wins and targeted revenue goals.
    Apply SoftwareReviews approach for greater GTM success.

    Our blueprint is designed to help you:

    • Align stakeholders on a common vision and execution plan prior to the build and launch phases.
    • Build a foundation of buyer and competitive understanding to drive a successful product hypothesis, then validate with buyers.
    • Deliver a team-aligned launch plan that enables launch readiness and outlines commercial success.

    SoftwareReviews Insight

    Creating a compelling go-to-market strategy, and keeping it current, is a critical software company function – as important as financial strategy, sales operations, and even corporate business development – given its huge impact on the many drivers of sustainable growth.

    Go-to-Market Strategy Critical Success Factors

    Your GTM Strategy is where a multi-disciplined team builds a strong foundation for overall product plan, build, launch, and manage success

    A GTM Strategy is not all art and not all science but requires both. Software leaders will establish a set of core capabilities upon which they will plan, build, launch and manage product success. Executives, when resourcing their GTM strategies, will begin with:
    • Strong Program Leadership – An experienced Program Manager will guide the team through each step of GTM Strategy and test team readiness before advancing to the next step.
    • Few Shortcuts – Successful teams will have navigated the process through all steps together at least once. Then future launches can skip steps where prior decisions still hold.
    • Stakeholder Buy-In – Strong collaboration among Sales, Marketing, and Product wins the day.
    • Strong Team Skills – Success depends on having the right talent, making the right decisions, and delivering the right outcomes enabled with the right set of technologies and integrated to reach the right buyers at the right moment.
    • Discipline and perseverance – Given that GTM Strategy is not easy, it’s not surprising that 75% of marketers cite a significant level of dissatisfaction with the outcomes of their GTM plan, build, and launch phases.
    Diagram titled 'Go-to-Market Phases' with phases 'Manage', 'Launch', 'Build', and highlighted as 'This blueprint focus': 'Plan'.

    SoftwareReviews Advisory Insight:
    Marketers who get GTM Strategy “right” give themselves a 50% greater chance of Build and Launch success.

    Sample of the 'PLAN' section of the GTM Strategy optimization diagram shown later.

    Go-to-Market Success is Challenging

    Getting GTM right is like winning an Olympic first-place crew finish. It takes teamwork, practice, and well-functioning tools and equipment.

    Stock image of a rowing team.

    • The goal of any Go-to-Marketing Strategy is not only to do it right once, but to do it over and over consistently.
    • A lack of GTM consistency often results in decelerating growth, and a weak GTM Strategy is likely the root cause when companies observe any of the following challenges:
      • Product opportunity is unclear and well-defined business cases are lacking
      • Buyer adoption slows of new features and launch revenue targets are missed
      • Sales and marketing are not ready when development releases new features
      • Sales win/loss ratios drop as customers tell us products are not competitively differentiated
      • Loss of executive support for new product investments
    • A company experiencing any one of these symptoms will find a remedy in plugging gaps in the way they Go-to-Market.

    “Figuring out a Go-to-Market approach is no trivial exercise – it separates the companies that will be successful and sustainable from those that won’t.” (Harvard Business Review)

    Slowing growth may be due to missing GTM Strategy essentials

    Marketers – Large and Small – will further test their GTM Strategy strength by asking “Are we missing any of the following?”

    • Product, Marketing, and Sales Alignment
    • Buyer personas and journeys
    • Product market opportunity size
    • Competitively differentiated product hypothesis
    • Buyer validated commercial concept
    • Sales revenue plan and program cost budget
    • Compelling business case for build and launch

    SoftwareReviews Advisory Insight:

    Marketers will go through the GTM Strategy process together across all disciplines at least once in order to establish a consistent process, make key foundational decisions (e.g. tech stack, channel strategy, pricing structure, etc.), and assess strengths and weaknesses to be addressed. Future releases to existing products don’t need to be re-thought but instead check-listed against prior foundational decisions.

    Is Your GTM Strategy Led and Staffed Properly?

    Staffing tree outlining GTM Strategy essentials. At the top are 'Steering Committee: CEO/GM in larger company, CFO/Senior Finance, Key functional leaders'. Next is 'Program Manager: Leads the GTM program. Workstream leads are “dotted line” for the program.' Followed by 'Workstream Leads: (PM) Product Marketing – Program leadership, (PD) Product Mgt. – Aligned with PM, (MO) Marketing Ops – SMB optional, (BR) Branding/Creative – SMB optional, (CI) Competitive Intel. – SMB optional, (DG) Demand Gen./Field Marketing. – crucial, (SE) Sales Enablement – crucial, (PR) PR/AR/Comms – SMB optional, and (CS) Customer Success – SMB optional'. In a 'Large Enterprise' each role is assigned to a separate person, but in a 'Small' Enterprise each person has multiple roles. 'SMB – as employees wear many hats, teams comprise members with requisite skills vs. specific roles/titles.'

    Benefits of a more effective go-to-market strategy

    Our research shows a more effective GTM Strategy delivers key benefits, including:
    • Increased product development ROI – with a finance-aligned business case, a buyer-validated value proposition, and the readiness of marketing and sales to product launch.
    • Launch campaign effectiveness – increases dramatically when messaging resonates with buyers and where they are in their journey.
    • Seller effectiveness – increases with buyer validated value proposition, competitive differentiation, and the ability to articulate to buyers.
    • Executive support – is achieved when an aligned sales, marketing, and product team proves consistent in delivering against release targets over and over again.

    SoftwareReviews Advisory Insight:
    Many marketers experiencing the value of the GTM Steering Committee, extend its use into a “Product and Pricing Council” (PPC) in order to move product-related decision making from ad-hoc to structured, and to reinforce GTM Strategy guardrails and best practices across the company.

    “Go-to-Market Strategies aren’t just for new products or services, they can also be used for:
    • Acquiring other businesses
    • Changing your business’s focus
    • Announcing a new feature
    • Entering a new market
    • Rebranding
    • Positioning or repositioning

    And while each GTM strategy is unique, there are a series of steps that every product marketer should follow.” (Product Marketing Alliance)

    Is your GTM Strategy optimized?

    Large detailed layout of the steps needed to 'Make Your Go-to-Market Strategy More Successful'. 'GTM Planning Success Can Be Elusive'; '75% of high-tech marketers desire a more effective GTM strategy...'. Steps: '1 Your Challenges - Are You Feeling Any of These Pains?', '2 Framework - Stay Aligned', '3 Planning - Check Your GTM Plan Steps', '4 Insight - Deliver Key Output', and '5 Results - Reap Key Benefits'. Source: SoftwareReviews, powered by Info-Tech Research Group.

    Marketers, in order to optimize a go-to-market strategy, will:

    1. Self assess for symptoms of a sub-optimized approach.
    2. Align marketing, sales, product, and customer success with a common vision and execution plan.
    3. Diagnose for missing steps.
    4. Ensure creation of key deliverables.
    5. And then be able to reap the rewards.

    Who benefits from an optimized go-to-market strategy?

    This research is designed for:
    • High-tech marketers who are:
      • Looking to improve any aspect of their go-to-market strategy.
      • Looking for a checklist of roles and responsibilities across the product planning, build, and launch processes.
      • Looking to foster better alignment among key stakeholders such as product marketing, product management, sales, field marketing/campaigners, and customer success.
      • Looking to build a stronger business case for new product development and launch.
    This research will help you:
    • Explain the benefits of a more effective go-to-market strategy to stakeholders.
    • Size the market opportunity for a product/solution.
    • Organize stakeholders for GTM operational success.
    • More easily present the GTM strategy to executives and colleagues.
    • Build and present a solid business case for product build and launch.
    This research will also assist:
    • High-tech marketing and product leaders who are:
      • Looking for a framework of best practices to improve and scale their GTM planning.
      • Looking to align team members from all the key teams that support high-tech product planning, build, launch, and manage.
    This research will help them:
    • Align stakeholders on an overall GTM strategy.
    • Coordinate tasks and activities involved across plan, build, launch, and manage – the product lifecycle.
    • Avoid low market opportunity pursuits.
    • Avoid poorly defined product launch business cases.
    • Build competence in managing cross-functional complex programs.

    SoftwareReviews’ Approach

    1

    Build baseline market, buyer, and competitive insights

    Sizing your opportunity, building deep buyer understanding, competitive differentiation, and routes to market are fundamental first steps.

    2

    Design initial product and business case

    Validate positioning and messaging against brand, develop packaging and pricing, and develop digital approach, launch campaign approach and supporting budgets across all areas.

    3

    Align stakeholder plans to prep for build

    Rationalize product release and concept to sales/financial plan and further develop customer success, PR/AR, MarTech, and analytics/metrics plans.

    Our methodology provides a step-by-step approach to build a more effective go-to-market strategy

    1.Build baseline market, buyer, and competitive insights 2. Design initial product and business case 3. Align stakeholder plans to prep for build
    Phase Steps
    1. Select Steering Committee, GTM team, and outline roles and responsibilities. Build an aligned vision.
    2. Build initial product hypothesis based on sales and buyer “jobs to be done” research.
    3. Size the product market opportunity.
    4. Outline digital and tech requirements to support the full GTM process.
    5. Clarify target buyer personas and the buyer journey.
    6. Identify competitive gaps, parity, and differentiators.
    7. Select the most effective routes to market.
    8. Craft initial GTM Strategy presentation for executive review and status check.
    1. Compare emerging messaging and positioning with existing brand for consistency.
    2. Formulate packaging and pricing.
    3. Build a buyer-validated product concept.
    4. Build an initial campaign plan and targets.
    5. Develop initial budgets across all areas.
    6. Draft an initial product business case.
    7. Update GTM Strategy for executive review and status check.
    1. Assess technology and tools support for GTM strategy as well as future phases of GTM build, launch, and manage.
    2. Outline support for customer onboarding and ongoing engagement.
    3. Build an awareness plan covering media, social media, and industry analysts.
    4. Finalize product business case with collaborative input from product, sales, and marketing.
    5. Develop a final executive presentation for request for approval to proceed to GTM build phase.
    Phase Outcomes
    1. Properly sized market opportunity and a unique buyer value proposition
    2. Buyer persona and journey mapping with buyer needs and competitive SWOT
    3. Tech stack modernization requirements
    4. First draft of business case
    1. Customer-validated value proposition and product-market fit
    2. Initial product business case with sales alignment
    3. Initial launch plans including budgets across all areas
    1. Key stakeholders and their plans are fully aligned
    2. Executive sign-off to move to GTM build phases

    Insight summary

    Your go-to-market strategy ability is a strategic asset

    Having an updated and compelling go-to-market strategy is a critical capability – as important as financial strategy, sales operations, and even corporate business development – given its huge impact on the many drivers of sustainable growth.

    Build the GTM Steering Committee into a strategic decision-making body

    Many marketers experiencing the value of the GTM Steering Committee extend its use into a “Product and Pricing Council” (PPC) in order to move product-related decision making from ad-hoc to structured, and to reinforce GTM Strategy guardrails and best practices across the company.

    A strong MarTech apps and analytics stack differentiates GTM leaders from laggards

    Marketers that collaborate closely with Marketing Ops., Sales Ops., and IT early in the process of a go-to-market strategy will be best able to assess whether current website/digital, marketing applications, CRM/sales automation apps, and tools can support the complete Go-to-Market process effectively.

    Establishing alignment through the GTM process builds long term operational strength

    Marketers will go through the GTM Strategy process together across all disciplines at least once in order to establish a consistent process, make key foundational decisions (e.g. tech stack, channel strategy, pricing structure, etc.), and assess strengths and weaknesses to be addressed.

    Build speed and agility

    Future releases to existing products don’t need be re-thought but instead check-listed against prior foundational decisions.

    GTM Strategy builds launch success

    Marketers who get GTM Strategy “right” give themselves a 50% greater chance of build and launch success.

    Blueprint deliverables

    Each step of this blueprint is accompanied by supporting deliverables to help you accomplish your goals:

    Key deliverable:

    Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation Template

    Capture key findings for your GTM Strategy within the Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation Template.

    Sample of the key deliverable, the Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation Template.

    Go-to-Market Strategy RACI and Launch Checklist Workbook

    Includes a RACI model and launch checklist that helps scope your working team’s roles and responsibilities.

    Sample of the Go-to-Market Strategy RACI and Launch Checklist Workbook deliverable.

    Go-to-Market Strategy Cost Budget and Revenue Forecast Workbook

    Capture launch incremental costs that, when weighed against the forecasted revenue, illustrate gross margins as a crucial part of the business case.

    Sample of the Go-to-Market Strategy Cost Budget and Revenue Forecast Workbook deliverable.

    Product Market Opportunity Sizing

    While not a deliverable of this blueprint per se, the Product Market Opportunity blueprint is required.

    Sample of the Product Market Opportunity Sizing deliverable. This blueprint calls for downloading the following additional blueprint:

    Buyer Persona and Journey blueprint

    While not a deliverable of this blueprint per se, the Buyer Persona and Journey blueprint is required

    Sample of the Buyer Persona and Journey blueprint deliverable.

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    Guided Implementation

    Workshop

    Consulting

    "Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful." "Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track." "We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place." "Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project."
    Included within advisory membership Optional add-ons

    Guided Implementation

    A Guided Implementation (GI) is a series of calls with a SoftwareReviews Advisory analyst to help implement our best practices in your organization.

    For guidance on marketing applications, we can arrange a discussion with an Info-Tech analyst.

    Your engagement managers will work with you to schedule analyst calls.

    What does our GI on Build a More Effective Go-to-Market Strategy look like?

    Build baseline market, buyer, and competitive insights

    Design initial product and business case

    Align stakeholder plans to prep for build

    Call #1: Share GTM vision and outline team activities for the GTM Strategy process. Plan next call – 1 week.

    Call #2: Outline product market opportunity approach and steps to complete. Plan next call – 1 week.

    Call #3: Hold a series of inquiries to do a modernization check on tech stack. Plan next call – 2 weeks.

    Call #4: Discuss buyer interview process, persona, and journey steps. Plan next call – 2 weeks.

    Call #5: Outline competitive differentiation analysis, routes to market, and review of to-date business case. Plan next call – 1 week.

    Call #6: Discuss brand strength/weakness, pricing, and packaging approach. Plan next call – 3 weeks.

    Call #7: Outline needs to craft assets with right messaging across campaign launch plan and budget. Outline needs to create plans and budgets across rest of marketing, sales, CX, and product. Plan next call – 1 week.

    Call #8: Review template and approach for initial business case and sales and product alignment. Plan next call – 1 week.

    Call #9: Review initial business case and launch plans across marketing, sales, CX, and product. Plan next call – 1 week.

    Call #10: Discuss plans/needs/budgets for tech stack modernization. Plan next call – 3 days.

    Call #11: Discuss plans/needs/budgets for CX readiness for launch. Plan next call – 3 days.

    Call #12: Discuss plans/needs/budgets for digital readiness for launch. Plan next call – 3 days.

    Call #13: Discuss plans/needs/budgets for marketing and sales readiness for launch. Plan next call – 3 days.

    Call #14: Review final business case and coach on Steering Committee Presentation. Plan next call – 1 week.

    A Go-to-Market Workshop Overview

    Contact your engagement manager for more information.
    Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5
    Align on GTM Vision & Plan, Craft Initial Strategy
    Identify Initial Business Case, Sales Forecast and Launch Plan
    Develop Launch Plans (i of ii)
    Develop Launch Plans (ii of ii)
    Present Final Business Case to Steering Committee
    Activities

    1.1 Outline a vision for GTM and roles required, identify Steering Committee lead, workstream leads, and teams.

    1.2 Capture GTM strategy hypothesis by working through initial draft of GTM Strategy Presentation and business case.

    1.3 Capture team knowledge on buyer persona and journey and competitive SWOT.

    1.4 Identify information/data gaps and sources and plan for capturing/gathering including buyer interviews.

    Plan next day 2-3 weeks after buyer persona/journey interviews.

    2.1 Size product market opportunity and initial revenue forecast.

    2.2 Craft initial product hypothesis from buyer interviews including feature priorities, pricing, packaging, competitive differentiation, and channel/route to market.

    2.3 Craft initial launch campaign, product release, sales, and CX readiness plans.

    2.4 Identify launch budgets across each investment area.

    2.5 Discuss initial product launch business case and key activities.

    Plan next day 2-3 weeks after product hypothesis-validation interviews with customers and prospects.

    3.1 Apply product interviews to scope, MVP, and roadmap competitive differentiation, pricing, feature prioritization, routes to market and sales forecast.

    3.2 Develop more detailed launch campaign plan complete with asset-types, messaging, digital plan to support buyer journey, media buy plan and campaign metrics.

    4.1 Develop detailed launch/readiness plans with final budgets for:

    • Sales enablement
    • Sales training
    • Tech stack
    • Customer onboarding & success
    • Product marketing
    • AR
    • PR
    • Corp comms/Internal comms
    • Customer events
    • Employee events
    • etc.

    5.1 Review final launch/readiness plans with final budgets for all key areas.

    5.2 Move all key findings up into Steering Committee presentation slides.

    5.3 Present to Steering Committee, receive feedback.

    5.4 incorporate Steering Committee feedback; update finial business case.

    Deliverables
    1. Documented Steering Committee and working team, aligned on GTM vision and process.
    2. Document team knowledge on initial GTM strategy, buyer persona and business case.
    1. Definition of product market fit, uniqueness and competitive differentiation.
    2. Preliminary product launch business case, campaign, targets, and readiness plans.
    1. Detailed launch plans, budgets for product and marketing launch.
    1. Detailed launch plans, budgets for product marketing, sales, customer success, and AR/PR/Corp. comms.
    1. Final GTM Strategy, launch plan and business case.
    2. Approvals to move to GTM build and launch phases.

    Build a More Effective Go-to-Market Strategy

    Phase 1

    Build baseline market, buyer, and competitive insights

    Phase 1

    1.1 Select Steering Cmte/team, build aligned vision for GTM

    1.2 Buyer personas, journey, initial messaging

    1.3 Build initial product hypothesis

    1.4 Size market opportunity

    1.5 Outline digital/tech requirements

    1.6 Competitive SWOT

    1.7 Select routes to market

    1.8 Craft GTM Strategy deck

    Phase 2

    2.1 Brand consistency check

    2.2 Formulate packaging and pricing

    2.3 Craft buyer-valid product concept

    2.4 Build campaign plan and targets

    2.5 Develop cost budgets across all areas

    2.6 Draft product business case

    2.7 Update GTM Strategy deck

    Phase 3

    3.1 Assess tech/tools support for all GTM phases

    3.2 Outline sales enablement and Customer Success plan

    3.3 Build awareness plan

    3.4 Finalize business case

    3.5 Final GTM Plan deck

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Steering Committee and Team formulation
    • A vision for go-to-market strategy
    • Initial product hypothesis
    • Market Opportunity sizing
    • Tech stack/digital requirements
    • Buyer persona and journey
    • Competitive gaps, parity, differentiators
    • Routes to market
    • GTM Strategy deck

    This phase involves the following stakeholders:

    • Steering Committee
    • Working group leaders

    To complete this phase, you will need:

    Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation Template Go-to-Market Strategy RACI and Launch Checklist Workbook Buyer Persona and Journey blueprint Product Market Opportunity Sizing Workbook
    Sample of the Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation Template deliverable. Sample of the Go-to-Market Strategy RACI and Launch Checklist Workbook deliverable. Sample of the Buyer Persona and Journey blueprint deliverable. Sample of the Product Market Opportunity Sizing Workbook deliverable.
    Use the Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation Template to document the results from the following activities:
    • Documenting your GTM Strategy stakeholders
    • Documenting your GTM Strategy working team
    Use the Go-to-Market Strategy RACI and Launch Checklist Workbook to:
    • Review the scope of roles and responsibilities required
    • Document the roles and responsibilities of your teams
    Use the Buyer Persona and Journey blueprint to:
    • Interview sales and customers/prospects to inform product concepts, understand persona and later, flush out buyer journey
    Use the Product Market Opportunity Sizing blueprint to:
    • Project Serviceable Obtainable Market (SOM), Serviceable Available Market (SAM), and Total Available Market (TAM) from your current penetrated market

    Step 1.1

    Identify a GTM Program Steering Committee and Team. Build an Aligned Vision for Your Go-to-Market Strategy Approach

    Activities
    • 1.1.1 Identify the Steering Committee of key stakeholders whose support will be critical to success
    • 1.1.2 Select your go-to-market strategy program team
    • 1.1.3 Discuss an overview of the GTM process and program roles and responsibilities with stakeholders and GTM workstream leads
    • 1.1.4 Develop a Go-to-Market launch, tiering, time-line, and overall program plan
    • 1.1.5 Work with each workstream lead on their overall project plan and incremental budget requirements

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Identify stakeholders – your Steering Committee
    • Identify team members
    • Present a vision of GTM Strategy

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Steering Committee
    • Program workstream leads

    Outcomes of this step

    • Steering Committee identified
    • Team members identified
    • All aligned on the GTM process
    • Go-to-market strategy timeline and program plan
    Phase 1 - Formulate a hypothesis and run discovery on key fundamentals
    Step 1.1 Step 1.2 Step 1.3 Step 1.4 Step 1.5 Step 1.6 Step 1.7 Step 1.8

    1.1.1 Identify stakeholders critical to success

    1-2 hours

    Input: Steering Committee interviews, Recognition of Steering Committee interest

    Output: List of GTM Strategy stakeholders as Steering Committee members

    Materials: Following slide outlining the key responsibilities required of the Steering Committee members, A high-Level timeline of GTM Strategy phases and key milestone meetings

    Participants: CMO, sponsoring executive, Functional leads - Marketing, Product Marketing, Product Management, Sales, Customer Success

    1. The GTM Strategy initiative manager should meet with the CMO to determine who will comprise the Steering Committee for your GTM Strategy.
    2. Finalize selection of steering committee members.
    3. Meet with members to outline their roles and responsibilities and ensure their willingness to participate.
    4. Document the steering committee members and the milestone/presentation expectations for reporting project progress and results.

    SoftwareReviews Advisory Insight:
    Go To Market Steering Committee’s can become an important ongoing body to steer overall product, pricing and other GTM decisions. Some companies have done so by adding the CEO and CFO to this committee and designated it as a permanent body that meets monthly to give go/no decisions to “all things product related” across all products and business units. Leaders that use this tool well, stay aligned, demonstrate consistency across business units and leverage outcomes across business units to drive greater scale.

    Go-to-Market Strategy Stakeholders

    Understand that aligning key stakeholders around the way your company goes to market is an essential company function.

    Title Key Roles Supporting an Effective Go-to-Market Strategy
    Go-to-Market Strategy Sponsor
    • Owns the function at the management/C-suite level
    • Responsible for breaking down barriers and ensuring alignment with organizational strategy
    • CMO, VP of Marketing, and in SMB Providers, the CEO
    Go-to-Market Strategy Program Manager
    • Typically a senior member of the marketing team
    • Responsible for organizing the GTM Strategy process, preparing summary executive-level communications and approval requests
    • Program manages the GTM Strategy process, and in many cases, the continued phases of build and launch.
    • Product Marketing Director, or other marketing director, that has strong program management skills, has run large scale marketing and/or product programs, and is familiar with the stakeholder roles and enabling technologies
    Functional Workstream Leads
    • Works alongside the Go-to-Market Strategy Initiative Manager on a specific product launch, campaign, rebranding, new market development, etc. and ensures their functional workstreams are aligned with the GTM Strategy
    • With typical GTM B2B a representative from each of the following functions will comprise the team:
      • Product Marketing, Product Management, Field Marketing, Creative, Marketing Ops/Digital, PR/Corporate Comms/AR, Social Media Marketing, Sales Operations, Sales Enablement/Training, and Customer Success
    Digital, Marketing/Sales Ops/IT Team
    • Comprised of individuals whose application and tech tools knowledge and skills are crucial to supporting the entire marketing tech stack and its integration with Sales/CRM
    • Responsible for choosing technology that supports the business requirements behind Go-to-Market Strategy, and eventually the build and launch phases as well
    • Digital Platforms, CRM, Marketing Applications and Analytics managers
    Steering Committee
    • Comprised of C-suite/management-level individuals that guide key decisions, approve of requests, and mitigate any functional conflicts
    • Responsible for validating goals and priorities, defining the scope, enabling adequate resourcing, and managing change especially among C-level leaders in Sales & Product
    • CMO, CTO/CPO, CRO, Head of Customer Success

    Download the Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation Template

    Roles vary by company size. Launch success depends on clear responsibilities

    Sample of the Go-to-Market Strategy RACI and Launch Checklist Workbook.

    Download the Go-to-Market Strategy RACI and Launch Checklist Workbook

    Success improves when you align & assign
    • Go-to-Market, build, and launch success improves when:
      • Phases and steps are outlined
      • Key activities are documented
      • Roles/functions are described
      • At the intersection of activities and role, whether the role is “Responsible,” “Accountable,” “Consulted,” or “Informed” is established across the team
    • Leaders will hold a workshop to establish RACI that fits with the scope and scale of your organization.
    • Confusion, conflict, and friction can be dramatically reduced/eliminated with RACI adoption and practice.
    • Review the RACI model and launch checklist within the Go-to-Market Strategy RACI and Launch Checklist Workbook in order to identify the full scope of roles and responsibilities needed.

    Go-to-Market Strategy Working Team

    Consider the skills and knowledge required for GTM Strategy as well as build and launch functions when choosing teams.

    Work with functional leaders to select workstream leads

    Workstream leads should be strong in collaboration, coordination of effort among others, knowledgeable about their respective function, and highly organized as they may be managing a team of colleagues within their function to deliver their responsible portion of GTM.

    Required Skills/Knowledge

    • Target Buyer
    • Product Roadmap
    • Brand
    • Competitors
    • Campaigns/Lead Gen
    • Sales Enablement
    • Media/Analysts
    • Customer satisfaction

    Suggested Functions

    • Product Marketing
    • Product Management
    • Creative Director
    • Competitive Intelligence
    • Demand Gen./Field Marketing
    • Sales Ops/Training/Enablement
    • PR/AR/Corporate Comms.
    • Customer Success
    Roles Required in Successful GTM Strategy
    For SMB companies, as employees wear many different hats, assign people that have the requisite skills and knowledge vs. the role title.

    Download the Go-to-Market Strategy RACI and Launch Checklist Workbook

    1.1.2 Select the GTM Strategy working team

    1-2 hours

    Input: Stakeholders and leaders across the various functions outlined to the left

    Output: List of go-to-market strategy team members

    Materials: Go-to-Market Strategy Workbook

    Participants: Initiative Manager, CMO, Sponsoring executive, Departmental Leads – Sales, Marketing, Product Marketing, Product Management (and others), Marketing Applications Director, Senior Digital Business Analyst

    1. The GTM Strategy Initiative Manager should meet with the GTM Strategy Sponsor and functional leaders of workstream areas/functions to determine which team members will serve as Steering Committee members and who will serve as workstream leads.
    2. The working team for your go-to-market strategy should have the following roles represented in the working team:
      • Depending on the initiative and the size of the organization, the team will vary.
      • Key business leaders in key areas – Product Marketing, Field Marketing, Digital Marketing, Inside Sales, Sales, Marketing Ops., Product Management, and IT – should be involved.
    3. Document the members of your go-to-market strategy team in the Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation slide entitled “Our Team.”

    Download the Go-To-Market Strategy RACI and Launch Checklist Workbook

    1.1.3 Develop a timeline for key milestones

    1 hour

    Timeline for Key Milestones with row headers 'Go-to-Market Phases', 'Major Milestones', and 'Key Phase Activities'. The phases (each column) and their associated activities are 'PLAN - Create buyer-validated product concept, size opportunity, and build business case', 'BUILD - Build product and enable readiness across the rest of marketing sales and customer success', 'LAUNCH - Release product, launch campaigns, and measure progress toward objectives', and then post-phase is 'MANAGE'. Notes in the 'Major Milestones' row: 'Outline key dates', 'Update with 'Today's Date' as you make progress', and 'Use GTM Plan major milestones or create your own'.

    GTM Program Managers:

    1. Will establish key program milestones working collaboratively with the Steering Cmte. and workstream leads.
    2. Outline key ”Market-facing” or external deliverables & dates, as well as internal.
    3. More detailed deliverable plans are called for working with workstream leads.
    4. This high-level overview will be used in regular Steering Cmte. and working team meets
    5. Record in the Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation

    Download the Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation Template

    1.1.5 Share your GTM strategy vision with your team

    1-2 hours

    Input: N/A

    Output: Team understanding of an effective go-to-market strategy, team roles and responsibilities and initial product and launch concept.

    Materials: The Build a More Effective Go-to-Market Strategy Executive Brief

    Participants: GTM Program Manager, CMO, Sponsoring executive, Workstream leads

    1. Download the Build a More Effective Go-to-Market Strategy Executive Brief and add the additional slides on Team Composition and Key Milestones you have created in prior steps as appropriate.
    2. Convene the Steering Committee and Working Team and take them through the Build a More Effective Go-to-Market Strategy Executive Brief with your additional slides to:
      1. Communicate team composition, roles and responsibilities, and key GTM Strategy program milestones.
      2. Educate them on what comprises a complete GTM Strategy from the Executive Brief.
    3. Optional: As a SoftwareReviews Advisory client, invite a SoftwareReviews analyst to present the Executive Brief if that is of help to you and your team.

    Go to the Build a More Effective Go-to-Market Strategy Executive Brief

    GTM program managers and workstream leads will collaborate on detailed project plans

    Timeline titled 'Workstreams Status' with a legend of shapes and colors, activities listed as row headers, timeline sections 'EXPLORE', 'DESIGN', 'ALIGN', and 'BUILD', and a column at the end of the timelines for the name of the workstream lead. Notes: 'Change names to actual workstream. Create separate pages for each', 'Overlay colored bars to indicate on/off track', 'Describe major deliverables & due dates', 'Outline major milestones', 'Update with your actual month and week-ending dates', 'Add workstream lead names'.

    Program managers will:

    • Outline an overall more detailed way of tracking GTM program workstreams, key dates and on/off track status

    Program managers & workstream leads will:

    • Call out each key workstream and workstream lead
    • Outline key deliverables and due dates
    • Track weekly for communicating status to Steering Cmte and working team meetings

    Use the Launch Checklist when building out full project plans

    Sample Launch Checklist table with project info above, and table columns 'Component', 'Owner', 'Start Date', 'Finish Date', 'G2M Plan', and 'Build'.

    Download the Go-to-Market Strategy RACI and Launch Checklist Workbook

    Continuous improvement is enabled with a repeatable process
    • With ownership assigned and set-back schedules in place, product marketing and management leaders can take the guesswork out of the GTM plan and build and launch process for the entire team.
    • “Lighter” versions are created for lower-tier releases.
    • Checklists ensure “we haven’t missed anything” and drive clarity among the team.
    • Articulating where we are now and what’s next increases management confidence.
    • Rinse and repeat improves overall quality and drives scale.

    1.1.6 Develop a project plan for each workstream

    Work with your workstream leads to see them develop a detailed project plan that spans all their deliverables for a GTM Strategy
    1. It’s essential that GTM initiative managers can rely upon workstream leads to provide the status of their respective workstreams in a shared environment for easy weekly updating and reporting.
    2. We suggest the following approach:
      1. GTM initiative managers should maintain a copy of the GTM Strategy Presentation in a shared drive so workstream leads can provide updates.
      2. Workstream leads should work with their GTM initiative manager to populate a version of the workstream tracker shown on the previous slide that enables team status reporting.
      3. Additional slides that actually show “work completed” (e.g. images of assets created, training plans, screen caps of software functionality, etc.) should be reviewed each week as well.
      4. GTM initiative leaders/program managers are advised to summarize the to-date work completed across the team into the Go-To-Market Product and Launch Business Case slides to demonstrate progress to the Steering Committee.
    3. The goal is to keep tracking manageable. Because status is most easily shown during Steering Committee and Working Team meetings using PowerPoint, we recommend a simple approach to program management by using PowerPoint.
    Using the Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation:
    3-4 hours Initial, 1-2 hours weekly
    1. Work with your workstream leads to create a slide for each workstream that will contain all the key milestones.
    2. Some teams will choose to use project management software, others a PowerPoint representation, which makes for easy presentation during status meets.
    3. Use the following resources:
      • In the Go-to-Market Strategy RACI and Launch Checklist Workbook, reference the Launch Checklist.
      • In the Go-to-Market Presentation, use the Appendix slides and complete for each workstream.
    4. The GTM initiative manager must be able to track status with workstream leads and present status to the rest of the team during Steering Committee and workstream lead meetings.

    Download the Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation Template

    Download the Go-To-Market Strategy RACI and Launch Checklist Workbook

    Step 1.2

    Hold Interviews With Sales Then Customers and Prospects to Inform Your Initial Product Concept

    Activities
    • 1.2.1 Use the SoftwareReviews Buyer Persona and Journey Interview Guide and Data Capture Tool found within the SoftwareReviews Buyer Persona and Journey blueprint.
    • 1.2.2 Follow the instructions within the above blueprint and hold interviews with Sales and customers and prospects to inform your buyer persona, initial product hypothesis, and buyer journey.
    • 1.2.3 Flush out the initial product and launch concept using the slides found within the Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation Template. You will continually refine the Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation Template such that you turn the Product and Launch descriptions into a business case for product build and launch. We advise you and your team to populate the slides to begin to inform an initial concept, then hold interviews with Sales, customers, and prospects to refine. The best way to capture customer and prospect insights is to use the Buyer Persona and Journey blueprint.

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Schedule time with sales/sales advisory to flush out the product concept
    • Develop your customer and prospect interviewee list
    • Consolidate findings for your GTM Strategy program slide deck

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Sales/sales advisory, product management, initiative leader (product marketing)
    • Customers and prospects

    Outcomes of this step

    • Guidance from sales on product concept
    • Initial guidance from customers and prospective buyers
    • Agreement to proceed further

    Phase 1 - Formulate a hypothesis and run discovery on key fundamentals

    Step 1.1 Step 1.2 Step 1.3 Step 1.4 Step 1.5 Step 1.6 Step 1.7 Step 1.8

    Documenting buyer personas enables success beyond marketing

    Documenting buyer personas has several essential benefits to marketing, sales, and product teams:
    • Achieve a better understanding of your target buyer – by building a detailed buyer persona for each type of buyer and keeping it fresh, you take a giant step in becoming a customer-centric organization.
    • Align the team on a common definition – will happen when you build buyer personas collaboratively and among teams that touch the customer.
    • Improved lead generation – increases dramatically when messaging and marketing assets across your lead generation engine better resonate with buyers because you have taken the time to understand them deeply.
    • More effective selling – is possible when sellers apply persona development output to their interactions with prospects and customers.
    • Better product-market fit – increases when product teams more deeply understand for whom they are designing products. Documenting buyer challenges, pain points, and unmet buyer needs gives product teams what they need to optimize product adoption.
    “It’s easier buying gifts for your best friend or partner than it is for a stranger, right? You know their likes and dislikes, you know the kind of gifts they’ll have use for, or the kinds of gifts they’ll get a kick out of. Customer personas work the same way. By knowing what your customer wants and needs, you can present them with content targeted specifically to those wants and needs.” (Emma Bilardi, Product Marketing Alliance, July 8, 2020)

    Buyer persona attributes that need defining

    A well defined buyer persona enables us to:

    • Clarify target org-types, identify buying decision makers and key personas, and determine how they make decisions
    • Align colleagues around a common definition of target buyer(s) to drive improvements in messaging and engagement across marketing, sales, and customer success
    • Identify specific asset-types and tools that, when activated within our lead gen engine and in the hands of sellers, helps a buyer move through a decision process
    Functional – “to find them”
    Job Role Titles Org Chart Dynamics Buying Center Firmographics

    Emotive – “what they do and jobs to be done”
    Initiatives – What programs/projects the persona is tasked with and what are their feelings and aspirations about these initiatives? Motivations? Build credibility? Get promoted? Challenges – Identify the business issues, problems, and pain points, that impede attainment of objectives. What are their fears, uncertainties, and doubts about these challenges? Buyer need – They may have multiple needs; which need is most likely met with the offering? Terminology – What are the keywords/phrases they organically use to discuss the buyer need or business issue?

    Decision Criteria – “how they decide”
    Buyer role – List decision-making criteria and power level. The five common buyer roles are champion, influencer, decision maker, user, and ratifier (purchaser/negotiator). Evaluation and decision criteria – The lens, either strategic, financial, or operational, through which the persona evaluates the impact of purchase.

    Solution Attributes – “what the ideal solution looks like”
    Steps in “Jobs to be Done” Elements of the “Ideal Solution” Business outcomes from ideal solution Opportunity scope – other potential users Acceptable price for value delivered Alternatives that see consideration Solution sourcing – channel, where to buy

    Behavioral Attributes – “how to approach them successfully”
    Content preferences – List the persona’s content preferences, could be blog, infographic, demo, video, or other, vs. long-form assets (e.g. white paper, presentation, analyst report). Interaction preferences – Which among in-person meetings, phone calls, emails, video conferencing, conducting research via web, mobile, and social. Watering holes – Which physical or virtual places do they go to network or exchange info with peers e.g. LinkedIn, etc.

    Buyer journeys are constantly shifting

    If you haven’t re-mapped buyer journeys recently, you may be losing to competitors that have. Leaders re-map buyer journeys frequently.
    • The multi-channel buyer journey is constantly changing – today’s B2B buyer uses industry research sites, vendor content marketing assets, software reviews sites, contacts with vendor salespeople, events participation, peer networking, consultants, emails, social media sites, and electronic media to research purchasing decisions.
    • COVID has dramatically decreased face-to-face – we estimate a B2B buyer spent between 20-25% more time online researching software buying decisions in 2021 than they did pre-COVID. This has diminished the importance of face-to-face selling and has given dramatic rise to digital selling and outbound marketing.
    • Content marketing has exploded – but without mapping the buyer journey and knowing where (by channel) and when (which buyer journey step) to offer content marketing assets, we will fail to convert prospects into buyers.

    SoftwareReviews Advisory Insight:
    Marketers are advised to update their buyer journey annually and with greater frequency when the human vs. digital mix is effected due to events such as COVID, and as emerging media such as Augmented Reality shifts asset-type usage and engagement options.

    “Two out of three B2B buyers today prefer remote human interactions or digital self service.

    And during August 2020-February 2021, use of digital self service leapt by 10%” (McKinsey & Company, 2021.)

    Challenges of not mapping persona and journey

    A lack of buyer persona and journey understanding is frequently the root cause of the following symptoms:
    • Lead generation results are way below expectations.
    • Inconsistent product-market fit.
    • Sellers have low success rates doing discovery with new prospects.
    • Website abandonment rates are really high.

    These challenges are often attributed to messaging and talk tracks that fail to resonate with prospects and products that fail to meet the needs of targeted buyers.

    SoftwareReviews Advisory Insight:
    Marketers developing buyer personas and journeys that lack agreement among Marketing, Sales, and Product of personas to target will squander precious time and resources throughout the customer targeting and acquisition process.

    “Forty-four percent of B2B marketers have already discovered the power of personas.” (Boardview, 2016.)

    1.2.1 Interview Sales and customers/prospects

    12 - 15 Hours, over course of 2-3 weeks

    Input: Insights from Sellers, Insights from customers and prospects

    Output: Completed slides outlining buyer persona, buyer journey, overall product concept, and detailed features and capabilities needed

    Materials: Create a Buyer Persona and Journey blueprint, Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation

    Participants: Product management lead, GTM Program Manager, Select sellers, Workstream leads that wish to participate in interviews

    1. Using the Create a Buyer Journey and Persona Journey blueprint:
      • Follow the instructions to interview a group of Sellers, and most importantly, several customers and prospects
        • For this stage in the GTM Strategy process, the goal is to validate your initial product and launch concept.
        • We urge getting through all the interview questions with interviewees as the answers inform:
          • Product market fit and Minimal Viable Product
          • Competitive differentiation
          • Messaging, positioning, and campaign targeting
          • Launch campaign asset creation.
      • Place summary findings into the Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation, and for reference, place the Buyer Persona and Journey Summaries into the Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation Appendix.

    Download the Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation Template

    Download the Create a Buyer Journey and Persona Journey blueprint

    Step 1.3

    Update Your Product Concept

    Activities
    • 1.3.1 Based on Sales and Customer/Prospect interviews, update:
      • Your product concept slide
      • Detailed prioritization of features and capabilities

    This step calls for the following activities:

    • Update the product concept slide based on interview findings
    • Update/create the stack-ranking of buyer requested feature and capability priorities

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Product management lead
    • GTM initiative leader
    • Select workstream leads who sat in on interview findings

    Outcomes of this step

    • Advanced product concept
    • Prioritized features for development during Build phase
    • Understanding of MVP to deliver customer value and deal “wins”

    Phase 1 - Formulate a hypothesis and run discovery on key fundamentals

    Step 1.1 Step 1.2 Step 1.3 Step 1.4 Step 1.5 Step 1.6 Step 1.7 Step 1.8

    1.3.1 Update Product and Launch concept

    2 Hours

    Input: Insights from Sellers, Insights from customers and prospects

    Output: Completed slides outlining product concept and detailed features and capabilities needed

    Materials: Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation

    Participants: Product management lead, GTM Program Manager, Select sellers, Workstream leads that wish to participate in interviews

    1. Using the Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation:
      • With interview findings, update the Product and Launch Concept, Buyer Journey, and Capture Key Features/Capabilities of High Importance to Buyers slides

    Download the Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation Template

    Product and Launch Concept

    At this early stage, summarize findings from concept interviews to guide further discovery, as well as go-to-market concepts and initial campaign concepts in upcoming steps.

    Job Function Attributes

    Target Persona(s):
    Typical Title:
    Buying Center/functional area/dept.:

    Firmographics:
    Industry specific/All:
    Industry subsegments:
    Sizes (by revenues, # of employees):
    Geographical focus:

    Emotive Attributes

    Initiative descriptions: Buyer description of project/program/initiative. What terms used?

    Business issues: What are the business issues related to this initiative? How is this linked to a CEO-level mission-critical priority?

    Key challenges: What business/process hurdles need to be overcome?

    Pain points: What are the pain points to the business/personally in their role related to the challenges that drove them to seek a solution?

    Success motivations: What motivates our persona to be successful in this area?

    Solution and Opportunity

    Steps to do the job: What are the needed steps to do this job today?

    Key features and capabilities: What are the key solution elements the buyer sees in the ideal solution? (See additional detail slide with prioritized features.)

    Key business outcomes: In business terms, what value (e.g. cost/time/FTE savings, deals won, smarter, etc.) is expected by implementing this solution?

    Other users/opportunities: Are there other users in the role team/company that would benefit from this solution?

    Pricing/Packaging

    What is an acceptable price to pay for this solution? Based on financial benefits and ROI hurdles, what’s a good price to pay? A high price? What are packaging options? Any competitive pricing to compare?

    Alternatives/Competition

    What are alternatives to this solution: How else would you solve this problem? Are there other solutions you’ve investigated?

    Channel Preferences

    Where would it be most convenient to buy?: Direct from provider? Channel partner/reseller? Download from the web?

    Decision Criteria Attributes

    Decision maker – Role, criteria/decision lens:
    User(s) – Role, criteria/decision lens:
    Influencer(s) – Role, criteria/decision lens:
    Ratifier(s) – Role, criteria/decision lens:

    Behavioral Attributes

    Interaction preferences: Best way for us to reach this role? Email? At events? Texting? Video calls?

    Content types: Which content types (specifics; videos, short blog/article, longer whitepapers, etc.) help us stay educated about this initiative area?

    Content sources: What news, data, and insight sources (e.g. specifics) do you use to stay abreast of what’s important for this initiative area?

    Update the Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation with findings from Sales and customer/prospect interviews.

    Capture key features/capabilities of high importance to buyers

    Ask buyers during interviews, as outlined in the Buyer Persona and Journey blueprint, to describe and rate key features by need. You will also review with buyers during the GTM Build phase, so it’s important to establish high priority features now.

    Example bar chart for 'Buyer Feature Importance Ratings' where 'Buyer Need' is rated for each 'Feature'.
    • List key feature areas for buyer importance rating.
    • Establish a rating scheme.
        E.g. a rating of:
      • 4.5 or higher = critical ROI driver
      • 3.5 to 4.5 = must haves
      • 2 to 3.5 = nice to have
      • Less than 2 = low importance
    • Have buyers rate each possible feature 0-5 after explaining the rating scheme. Ask – are we missing any key features?
    • Update this slide, found within the Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation, with customer/prospect interview findings.
    Perform the same buyer interviews for non-feature “capabilities” such as:
    • Ease of use, security, availability of training, service model, etc. – and other “non-feature” areas that you need for your product hypothesis.

    Step 1.4

    Size the Product Market Opportunity

    Activities
    • 1.3.1 Based on the product concept, size, and the product market opportunity and with a focus on your “Obtainable Market”:
      • Clarify the definitions used to size market opportunity.
      • Source data both internally and externally.
      • Calculate the available, obtainable market for your software product.

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Review market sizing definitions and identify required data
    • Identify the target market for your software application
    • Source market and internal data that will support your market sizing
    • Document and validate with team members

    This step involves the following participants:

    • GTM initiative leader
    • CMO, select workstream leads

    Outcomes of this step

    • Definitions on market sizing views
    • Data sourcing established
    • Market sizing and estimated penetration calculations

    Phase 1 - Formulate a hypothesis and run discovery on key fundamentals

    Step 1.1 Step 1.2 Step 1.3 Step 1.4 Step 1.5 Step 1.6 Step 1.7 Step 1.8

    Market opportunity sizing definitions

    Your goal is to assess whether or not the opportunity is significantly sized and if you are well positioned to capture it

    1. This exercise is designed to help size the market opportunity for this particular product GTM launch and not the market opportunity for the entire product line or company. First a few market sizes to define:
      1. Penetrated – is your current revenues and can be expressed in your percentage vs. competitors’.
      2. Serviceable Obtainable Market (SOM) – larger than your currently penetrated market, and a percentage of SAM that can realistically be achieved. It accounts for your current limitations to reach and your ability to sell to buyers. It is restricted by your go-to-market ability and reduced by competitive market share. SOM answers: What increased market can we obtain by further penetrating accounts within current geographical coverage and go-to-market abilities and within our ability to finance our growth?
      3. Serviceable Available Market (SAM) – larger than SOM yet smaller than TAM, SAM accounts for current products and current go-to-market capabilities and answers: What if every potential buyer bought the products we have today and via the type of go-to-market (GTM) especially geographical coverage, we have today? SAM calls for applying our current GTM into unpenetrated portions of currently covered customer segments and regions.
      4. Total Available Market (TAM) – larger than SAM, TAM sizes a market assuming we could penetrate other customer segments within currently covered regions without regard for resources, capabilities, or competition. It answers the question: If every potential buyer within our available market – covered regions – bought, how big would the market be?
      5. Total Global Market – estimates market opportunity if all orgs in all segments and regions bought – with full disregard for resources and without the restrictions of our current GTM abilities.
      6. Develop your market opportunity sizing using the Product Market Opportunity Sizing Workbook.

    Download the Product Market Opportunity Sizing Workbook

    SoftwareReviews Advisory Insight:
    Product marketers that size the product market opportunity and account for the limitations posed by competitors, current sales coverage, brand permission, and awareness, provide their organizations with valuable insights into which inhibitors to growth should be addressed.

    Visualization of market opportunity sizes as circles within bigger circles, 'Penetrated Market' being the smallest and 'Global Market' being the largest.

    1.4.1 Size the product market opportunity

    Your goal is two-fold: Determine the target market size, and develop a realistic 12–24 month forecast to support your business case
    1. Open the Product Market Opportunity Sizing Workbook.
    2. Follow the instructions within.
    3. When finished, download the Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation and update the Product Market Opportunity Size slide with your calculated Product Market Opportunity Size.

    Download the Product Market Opportunity Sizing Workbook

    Download the Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation Template

    “Segmentation, targeting and positioning are the three pillars of modern marketing. Great segmentation is the bedrock for GTM success but is overlooked by so many.” (Product Marketing Alliance)

    Step 1.5

    Outline Digital and Tech Requirements

    Activities

    Designing your go-to-market strategy does not require a robust customer experience management (CXM) platform, but implementing your strategy during the next steps of Go-to-Market – Build then Launch – certainly does.

    Review info-Tech’s CXM blueprint to build a more complete, end-to-end customer interaction solution portfolio that encompasses CRM alongside other critical components.

    The CXM blueprint also allows you to develop strategic requirements for CRM based on customer personas and external market analysis called for during your GTM Strategy design.

    Diagram of 'Customer Relationship Management' surrounded by its components: 'Web Experience Management Platform', 'E-Commerce & Point-of-Sale Solutions', 'Social Media Management Platform', 'Customer Intelligence Platform', 'Customer Service Management Tools', and 'Marketing Management Suite'.

    These steps outlined in the CXM blueprint, will help you:

    • Assess your CRM application(s) and the environment in which they exist. Take a business-first strategy to prioritize optimization efforts.
    • Validate CRM capabilities, user satisfaction, issues around data, vendor management, and costs to build out an optimization strategy
    • Pull this all together to develop a prioritized optimization roadmap.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Marketing Operations, Digital, IT
    • Project workstream leads as appropriate

    Outcomes of this step

    • After inquiries with appropriate analysts, client will be able to assess what new application and technology support is required to support Go To Market process.

    Phase 1 - Formulate a hypothesis and run discovery on key fundamentals

    Step 1.1 Step 1.2 Step 1.3 Step 1.4 Step 1.5 Step 1.6 Step 1.7 Step 1.8

    Step 1.6

    Identify features and capabilities that will drive competitive differentiation

    Activities
    • 1.6.1 Hold a session with key stakeholders including sales, customer success, product, and product marketing to develop a hypothesis of features and capabilities vs. competitors: differentiators, parity areas, and gaps (DPG).
    • Optional for clients with buyer reviews and key competitive reviews within target product category:
      • 1.6.2 Request from SoftwareReviews a 2X2 Matrix Report of Importance vs. Satisfaction for both features and capabilities within your product market/category to identify areas of competitive DPG.
      • 1.6.3 Hold an Inquiry with covering ITRG analysts in your product category to have them validate key areas of competitive DPG.
    • 1.6.4 Document competitive DPG and build out your hypothesis for product build as you ready for customer interviews to validate that hypothesis.

    This step will provide processes to help you:

    • Understand and document competitive differentiation, parity, and gaps

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Project workstream leads in product marketing, competitive intelligence, product management, and customer success

    Outcomes of this step

    • Develop a clear understanding of what differentiated capabilities to promote, which parity items to mention in marketing, and which areas are competitive gaps
    • Develop a hypothesis of what areas need to be developed during the Build phase of the Go-to-Market lifecycle

    Phase 1 - Formulate a hypothesis and run discovery on key fundamentals

    Step 1.1 Step 1.2 Step 1.3 Step 1.4 Step 1.5 Step 1.6 Step 1.7 Step 1.8

    Assess current capabilities and competitive differentiation vs. buyer needs

    Taking buyer needs ratings from step 1.3, assess your current and key competitive capabilities against buyer needs for both feature and non-feature capabilities. Incorporate into your initial product hypothesis.

    Example bar chart for 'Competitive Differentiation, Parity and Gaps – Features' comparing ratings of 'Buyer Need', 'Our Current Capabilities', and 'Competitive Capabilities' for each 'Feature'.

    • Rank features in order of buyer need from step 1.3.
    • Prioritize development needs where current capabilities are rated low. Spot areas for competitive differentiation especially in high buyer-need areas.
    Perform the analysis for non-feature capabilities such as:
    • ease of use
    • security
    • availability of training
    • service model

    Optional: Validate feature and capability importance with buyer reviews

    Request from your SoftwareReviews Engagement Manager the “Importance vs. Satisfaction” analysis for your product(s) feature and non-feature capabilities under consideration for your GTM Strategy

    Satisfaction
    Fix Promote
    Importance

    Low Satisfaction
    High Importance

    These features are important to their market and will highlight any differentiators to avoid market comparison.

    High Satisfaction
    High Importance

    These are real strengths for the organization and should be promoted as broadly as possible.

    Low Satisfaction
    Low Importance

    These features are not important for the market and are unlikely to drive sales if marketing material focuses on them. Rationalize investment in these areas.

    High Satisfaction
    Low Importance

    Features are relatively strong, so highlight that these features can meet customer needs
    Review Maintain

    Overall Category Product Feature Satisfaction Importance

    • Importance is based on how strongly satisfaction for a feature of a software suite correlates to the overall Likeliness to Recommend
    • Importance is relative – low scores do not necessarily indicate the product is not important, just that it’s not as important as other features

    (Optional for clients with buyer reviews and key competitive reviews within target product category.)

    Optional: Feature importance vs. satisfaction

    Example: ERP “Vendor A” ratings and recommended key actions. Incorporate this analysis into your product concept if updating an existing solution. Have versions of the below run for specific competitors.

    Importance vs. Satisfaction map for Features, as shown on the previous slide, but with examples mapped onto it using a legend, purple squares are 'Enterprise Resource Planning' and green triangles are 'Vendor A'.

    Features in the “Fix” quadrant should be addressed in this GTM Strategy cycle.

    Features in the “Review” quadrant are low in both buyer satisfaction and importance, so vendors are wise to hold on further investments and instead focus on “Fix.”

    Features in the “Promote” quadrant are high in buyer importance and satisfaction, and should be called out in marketing and selling.

    Features in the “Maintain” quadrant are high in buyer satisfaction, but lower in importance than other features – maintain investments here.

    (Optional for clients with buyer reviews and key competitive reviews within target product category.)

    Optional: Capabilities importance vs. satisfaction

    Example: ERP “Vendor A” capabilities ratings and recommended key actions. Incorporate this analysis into your product concept for non-feature areas if updating an existing solution. Have versions of the below run for specific competitors.

    Importance vs. Satisfaction map for Capabilities with examples mapped onto it using a legend, purple squares are 'Enterprise Resource Planning' and green triangles are 'Vendor A'.

    Capabilities in the “Fix” quadrant should be addressed in this GTM Strategy cycle.

    Capabilities in the “Review” quadrant are low in both buyer satisfaction and importance, so vendors are wise to hold on further investments and instead focus on “Fix.”

    Capabilities in the “Promote” quadrant are high in buyer importance and satisfaction, and should be called out in marketing and selling.

    Capabilities in the “Maintain” quadrant are high in buyer satisfaction, but lower in importance than other features – maintain investments here.

    (Optional for clients with buyer reviews and key competitive reviews within target product category.)

    Develop a competitively differentiated value proposition

    Combining internal competitive knowledge with insights from buyer interviews and buyer reviews; establish which key features that will competitively differentiate your product when delivered

    Example bar chart for 'Competitive Differentiation, Parity and Gaps – Features and Capabilities' comparing ratings of 'Your Product' and 'Competitor A' with high buyer importance at the top, low at the bottom, and rankings of each 'Differentiator', 'Parity', and 'Gap'.

    • Identify what buyers need that will differentiate your product features and company capabilities from key competitors.
    • Determine which features and company capabilities, ideally lower in buyer importance, can achieve/maintain competitive parity.
    • Determine which features and company capabilities, ideally much lower in buyer importance, that can exist in a state of competitive gap.

    Step 1.7

    Select the Most Effective Routes to Market

    Activities
    • 1.7.1 Understand a framework for deciding how to approach evaluating each available channel including freemium/ecommerce, inside sales, field sales, and channel partner.
    • 1.7.2 Gather data that will inform option consideration.
    • 1.7.3 Apply to decision framework and present to key stakeholders for a decision.

    This step will provide processes to help you:

    • Understand the areas to consider when choosing a sales channel
    • Support your decision by making a specific channel recommendation

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Project workstream leads in Sales, Sales Operations, Product Marketing, and Customer Success

    Outcomes of this step

    • Clarity around channel choice for this specific go-to-market strategy cycle
    • Pros and cons of choices with rationale for selected channel

    Phase 1 - Formulate a hypothesis and run discovery on key fundamentals

    Step 1.1 Step 1.2 Step 1.3 Step 1.4 Step 1.5 Step 1.6 Step 1.7 Step 1.8

    Your “route-to-market” – channel strategy

    Capture buyer channel preferences in Step 1.3, and research alternatives using the following framework

    Inside vs. Field Sales – Selling software during COVID has taught us that you can successfully sell software using virtual conferencing tools, social media, the telephone, and even texting and webchat – so is the traditional model of field/territory-based sellers being replaced with inside/virtual sellers who can either work at home, or is there a benefit to being in the office with colleagues?

    Solutions vs. Individual Products – Do your buyers prefer to buy a complete solution from a channel partner or a solutions integrator that puts all the pieces together, and can handle training and servicing, for a more complete buyer solution?

    Channel Partner vs. Build Sales Force – Are there channel partners that, given your product is targeting a new buyer with whom you have no relationship, can leverage their existing relationships, quicken adoption of your products, and lower your cost of sales?

    Fully Digital – Is your application one where users can get started for free then upgrade with more advanced features without the use of a field or inside sales person? Do you possess the e-commerce platform to support this?

    While there are other considerations beyond the above to consider, decide which channel approach will work best for this GTM Strategy.

    Flowchart on how to capture 'Buyer Channel Preferences' with five possible outcomes: 'Freemium/e-commerce', 'Use specified channel partner', 'Establish channel partner', 'Use Inside Sales', and 'Use Field Sales'.

    Channel Partnerships are Expanding

    “One estimate is that for every dollar a firm spends on its SaaS platform, it spends four times that amount with systems integrators and other channel partners.

    And as technologies are embedded inside other products, services, and solutions, effective selling requires more partners.

    Salesforce, for example, is recruiting thousands of new partners, while Microsoft is reportedly adding over 7,000 partners each month.” (HBR, 2021)

    Step 1.8

    Craft an Initial GTM Strategy Presentation for Executive Review and Status Check

    Activities
    • 1.8.1 Finalize the set of slides within the Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation that best illustrates the many key findings and recommended decisions that have been made during the Explore phase of the GTM Strategy.
      • Test whether all key deliverables have been created, especially those that must be in place in order to support future phases and steps.
      • Schedule a Steering Committee meeting and present your findings with the goal to gain support to proceed to the Design phase of GTM Strategy.

    This step will provide processes to help you:

    • Work with your colleagues to consolidate the findings from Phase 1 of the GTM Strategy
    • Create a slide deck with your colleagues for presentation to the Steering Committee to gain approvals to proceed to Phase 2

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Project workstream leads in Sales, Sales Operations, Product Marketing, and Customer Success
    • Steering Committee

    Outcomes of this step

    • Slide deck to present to the Steering Committee
    • Approvals to move to Phase 2 of the GTM Strategy

    Phase 1 - Formulate a hypothesis and run discovery on key fundamentals

    Step 1.1 Step 1.2 Step 1.3 Step 1.4 Step 1.5 Step 1.6 Step 1.7 Step 1.8

    1.8.1 Build your GTM Strategy deck for Steering Committee approval

    1. As you near completion of the Go-to-Market Strategy Phase, Explore Step, an important test to pass before proceeding to the Design step of GTM Strategy, is to answer several key questions:
      1. Have you properly sized the market opportunity for the focus of this GTM cycle?
      2. Have you defined a unique value proposition of what buyers are looking for?
      3. And have you aligned stakeholders on the target customer persona and flushed out an accurate buyer journey?
    2. If the answer is “no” you need to return to these steps and ensure completion.
    3. Pull together a summary review deck, schedule a meeting with the Steering Committee, present to-date findings for approval to move on to Phase 2.

    Download the Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation Template

    Sample of the 'PLAN' section of the GTM Strategy optimization diagram with 'GTM Explore Review' circled in red.

    The presentation you create contains:

    • Team composition and roles and responsibilities
    • Steps in overall process
    • Goals and objectives
    • Timelines and work plan
    • Initial product and launch concept
    • Buyer persona and journey
    • Competitive differentiation
    • Channel strategy

    Build a More Effective Go-to-Market Strategy

    Phase 2

    Design your initial product and business case

    Phase 1

    1.1 Select Steering Cmte/team, build aligned vision for GTM

    1.2 Buyer personas, journey, initial messaging

    1.3 Build initial product hypothesis

    1.4 Size market opportunity

    1.5 Outline digital/tech requirements

    1.6 Competitive SWOT

    1.7 Select routes to market

    1.8 Craft GTM Strategy deck

    Phase 2

    2.1 Brand consistency check

    2.2 Formulate packaging and pricing

    2.3 Craft buyer-valid product concept

    2.4 Build campaign plan and targets

    2.5 Develop cost budgets across all areas

    2.6 Draft product business case

    2.7 Update GTM Strategy deck

    Phase 3

    3.1 Assess tech/tools support for all GTM phases

    3.2 Outline sales enablement and Customer Success plan

    3.3 Build awareness plan

    3.4 Finalize business case

    3.5 Final GTM Plan deck

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Branding consistency check
    • Formulate packaging and pricing
    • Craft buyer-validated product concept
    • Build initial campaign plan and targets
    • Develop budgets for creative, content, and media purchases
    • Draft product business case
    • Update GTM Strategy deck

    This phase involves the following stakeholders:

    • Steering Committee
    • Working group leaders

    To complete this phase, you will need:

    Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation TemplateGo-to-Market Strategy RACI and Launch Checklist WorkbookBuyer Persona and Journey blueprintGo-to-Market Strategy Cost Budget and Revenue Forecast Workbook
    Sample of the Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation Template deliverable.Sample of the Go-to-Market Strategy RACI and Launch Checklist Workbook deliverable.Sample of the Buyer Persona and Journey blueprint deliverable.Sample of the Go-to-Market Strategy Cost Budget and Revenue Forecast Workbook deliverable.
    Use the Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation Template to document the results from the following activities:
    • Documenting your GTM strategy stakeholders
    • Documenting your GTM strategy working team
    Use the Go-to-Market Strategy RACI and Launch Checklist Workbook to:
    • Review the scope of roles and responsibilities required
    • Document the roles and responsibilities of your teams
    Use the Buyer Persona and Journey blueprint to:
    • Interview sales and customers/prospects to inform product concepts, understand persona and later, flesh out buyer journeys
    Use the Go-to-Market Cost Budget and Revenue Forecast Workbook to:
    • Tally budgets from across key functions involved in GTM Strategy
    • Compare with forecasted revenues to assess gross margins

    Step 2.1

    Compare Emerging Messaging and Positioning With Existing Brand for Consistency

    Activities

    Share messaging documented with the buyer journey with branding/creative and/or Marketing VP/CMO to ensure consistency with overall corporate messaging. Use the “Brand Diagnostic” on the following slide as a quick check.

    For those marketers that see the need for a re-brand, please:
    Download the Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation Template

    Later during the Build phase of GTM, marketing assets, digital platforms, sales enablement, and sales training will be created where actual messaging can be written with brand guidelines aligned.

    This step is to assess whether you we need to budget extra funds for any rebranding.

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • After completing the buyer journey and identifying messaging, test with branding/CMO that new messaging aligns with current:
      • Company positioning
      • Messaging
      • Brand imagery

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Project lead
    • Product marketing
    • Branding/creative
    • CMO

    Outcomes of this step

    • Check – Y/N on brand alignment
    • Adjustments made to current branding or new product messaging to gain alignment

    Phase 2 – Validate designs with buyers and solidify product business case

    Step 2.1 Step 2.2 Step 2.3 Step 2.4 Step 2.5 Step 2.6 Step 2.7

    Brand identity

    Re-think tossing a new product into the same old marketing engine. Ask if your branding today and on this new offering needs help.

    If you answer “no” to any of the following questions, you may need to re-think your brand. Does your brand:

    • recognize buyer pain points and convey clear pain-relief?
    • convey unique value that is clearly distanced from key competitors?
    • resonate with how target personas see themselves (e.g. rebellious, intelligent, playful, wise, etc.) and convey the “feeling” (e.g. relief, security, confidence, inspiration, etc.) buyers seek?
    • offer proof points via customer testimonials (vs. claimed value)?
    • tell a truly customer-centric story that is all about them (vs. what you want them to know about you)?
    • use words (e.g. quality, speed, great service, etc.) that equate to how buyers actually see you? Is your tone of voice going to resonate with your target buyer?
    • present in a clean, simple, and truly unique way? And will your brand identity stand the test of time?
    • represent feedback gleaned from prospects as well as customers?

    “Nailing an impactful brand identity is a critical part of Growth Marketing.

    Without a well-crafted and maintained brand identity, your marketing will always feel flat and one-dimensional.” (Lean Labs, 2021)

    Step 2.2

    Formulate Packaging and Pricing

    Activities
    • 2.2.1 Leverage what was learned in Phase 1 from buyer interviews to create an initial packaging and initial pricing approach.
      • Packaging success is driven by knowing what the buyer values are, how newly proposed functionality may work with other applications, and how well the buyer(s) work in teams.
      • Develop pricing using cost-plus, value/ROI, and competitive/market pricing comparisons.

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Approaches to establishing price points for software products
    • Checking if pricing supports emerging product revenue plan

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Project lead
    • Product Marketing
    • Product Management
    • Pricing (if a function)

    Outcomes of this step

    • Pricing that is validated through buyer interviews and consistent with overall company pricing guardrails
    • Packaging that can be delivered

    Phase 2 – Validate designs with buyers and solidify product business case

    Step 2.1 Step 2.2 Step 2.3 Step 2.4 Step 2.5 Step 2.6 Step 2.7

    2.2.1 Formulate packaging and pricing

    Goal: Incorporate buyer benefits into your MVP that delivers the buyer value that compels them to purchase and drives the business case

    1. Leverage findings from buyer interviews and feature prioritization found in Step 1.3 to arrive at initial feature inclusion.
    2. Leverage feedback from customer interviews and competitive pricing analysis to arrive at an initial target price offer.
    3. Go to the Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation and use the slides labeled “Go-to-Market Strategy, Overall Project Plan.”

    Download the Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation Template

    Refer to the findings from buyer persona interviews

    Sample of the Buyer Persona and Journey blueprint deliverable.

    Step 2.3

    Build a Buyer-Validated Product Concept

    Activities
    • 2.2.1 Add to your initial product concept from Phase 1, the pricing and packaging approach.
      • Take the concept out to buyers to get their feedback – not on UX design, that will come later, but to ensure the value is clear to the buyers, and to raise confidence in the product concept.
      • As with previous customer and prospect interviews, use the Buyer Persona and Journey blueprint with its accompanying interview guide and focus on the product related questions.
      • Generate your slides to present and discuss with buyers, capture feedback, and refine the product concept.

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Hold buyer interviews to review the product design
    • Validate concept and commercial variables – not UX design, that comes later

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Project lead
    • Product Marketing
    • Product Management

    Outcomes of this step

    • Customer validated product concept that meets the business plan

    Phase 2 – Validate designs with buyers and solidify product business case

    Step 2.1 Step 2.2 Step 2.3 Step 2.4 Step 2.5 Step 2.6 Step 2.7

    2.3.1 The best new product hypothesis doesn’t always come from your best customers

    Goal: Validate your product concept and business case

    1. Key areas to validate during product concept feedback:
      1. Feature/capability-build priorities – Which set of features and capabilities (i.e. service model, etc.) must be delivered in a minimum viable product (MVP) that delivers unique and competitively differentiating buyer value so we have win rates that support the business case?
      2. Packaging/Pricing – Are their features/capabilities that are not in base offering but offered as add-ons or not at all? Are their different packaging options that must be delivered given different customer segments and appropriate price points? (E.g. a small- to-medium sized business (SMB) version, Freemium, or Basic vs. Premium offerings?
      3. Routes to Market/Channel – Ensure you validate your channel strategy as work/effort will be needed to arrive at channel sales and marketing enablement.

    Download the Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation Template

    “Innovation opportunities almost always come from understanding a company’s worst customers or customers it doesn’t serve” (Harvard Business School Press, 1997)

    2.3.2 How your prospects buy will inform upcoming campaign design

    Goal: During product validation interviews, further validate the buyer journey to identify asset types to be created/sourced for launch campaign design

    1. Leverage findings from buyer interviews with a focus on buyer journey questions/answers found in Step 1.3 and further validated during product concept feedback in step 2.3.
    2. Your goal is to uncover the following key areas (see next slide for illustration):
      1. Validate the steps buyers take throughout the buyer journey – when you validate buyer steps and what the buyer is doing and thinking as they make a buying decision determines if you are supporting the right process.
      2. Validate the human vs. non-human/digital interaction type for each step – this determines whether your lead gen engine or your salesforce (or channel partner) will deliver the marketing assets and sales collateral.
      3. Describe the asset-types most valued by buyers during each step – this will provide the guidance your demand gen/field marketers need to either work with product marketing and creative to design and build, or source the right marketing asset and sales collateral for your lead gen engine and to support sales enablement.
      4. Identify which channels – this will give your digital team the guidance they need to design the “where” to place the assets within your lead gen engine. Feedback from customer interviews and competitive pricing analysis to arrive at an initial target price for offering is shown on the next slide.
    3. Use the Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation to complete the buyer journey slide with key findings.

    Download the Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation Template

    Refer to the findings from buyer persona interviews

    Sample of the Buyer Persona and Journey blueprint deliverable.

    Answers you need to map buyer journey

    Your buyer interviews – whether during earlier steps or here during product concept validation – will give specific answers to all areas in green text below. Understanding channels, asset-types, and crafting your key messaging are essential for next steps.

    Table outlining an example buyer's journey with fields in green text that are to be to replaced with answers from your buyer interviews.

    Step 2.4

    Build Your Initial Campaign Plan and Targets

    Activities
    • 2.4.1. While product management and marketing is working on the business case, the campaign team is designing their launch campaign.
    • Expand from the product concept and build out the entire launch campaign identifying dates, CTA’s, channels, and asset types needed that will be built during the Build phase.

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Outline deployment plan of activities and outcomes
    • Draw up specs for needed assets, web-page changes, emails, target segments, and targets for leads generated

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Project lead
    • Field Marketing
    • Product Marketing

    Outcomes of this step

    • The initial draft of the campaign plan that outlines multichannel activities, dates, and assets that need to be sourced and/or created

    Phase 2 – Validate designs with buyers and solidify product business case

    Step 2.1 Step 2.2 Step 2.3 Step 2.4 Step 2.5 Step 2.6 Step 2.7

    2.4.1 Document your campaign plan

    2 hours

    On the following Awareness and Lead Gen Engine slide:
    1. Tailor the slide to describe your lead generation engine as you will use it when you get to latter steps to describe the activities in your lead gen engine and weigh them for go-to-market strategy.
    2. Use the template to see what makes up a typical lead gen and awareness building engine to see what you may be missing, as well as to record your current engine “parts.”
      • Note: The “Goal” image in upper right is meant as a reminder that marketers should establish a goal for Sales Qualified Leads (SQL’s) delivered to field sales for each campaign.

    On the Product and Launch Concept slides:

    1. Update the slides with findings from 2.3 and 2.4.

    Download the Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation Template

    “Only 32% of marketers – and 29% of B2B marketers – said the process of planning campaigns went very well. Just over half were sure they had selected the right business goal for a given marketing project and only 42% were confident they identified the right audience – which is, of course, a critical determinant for achieving success.” (MIT Sloan Management Review)

    Launch campaign

    Our Goal for [Campaign name] is to generate X SQL’s

    Flowchart of the steps to take when a campaign is launched, from 'Organic Website Visits' and 'Go Live' to future 'Sales Opportunities'. A key is present to decipher various icons.

    Awareness

    PR/EXTERNAL COMMS:

    Promote release in line with company story

    • [Executive Name] interview with [Publication Y] on [Launch Topic X] – Mo./Day
    • Press Release on new enhancements – Mo./Day
    • [Executive Name] interview with [Publication Z] on [Launch Topic X] – Mo./Day
    ANALYST RELATIONS:

    Receive analyst feedback pre-launch and brief with final releases messaging/positioning

    • Inquiry with [Key Analysts] on [Launch Topic X] – Mo./Day, pre launch
    • Press Release shared on new enhancements – Launch day minus two days
    • Analyst briefing with [Key Analysts] on [Launch Topic X] – Launch day minus two days

    Download the Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation Template

    2.4.2 Campaign targets

    Goal: Establish a Marketing-Influenced Win target that will be achieved for this launch

    We advise setting a target for the launch campaign. Here is a suggested approach:
    1. Understand what % of all sales wins are touched by marketing either through first or last touch attribution. This is the % of Marketing-Influenced Wins (MIWs).
    2. Determine what sales wins are needed to attain product revenue targets for this launch.
    3. Apply the actual company MIW % to the number of deals that must be closed to achieve target product launch revenues. This becomes the MIW target for this launch campaign.
    4. Then, using your average marketing funnel conversion rates working backwards from MIWs to Opportunities, Sales Accepted Leads (SALs), Sales Qualified Leads (SQLs), Marketing Qualified Leads (MQLs), up to website visits.
    5. Update the slides with findings from 2.3 and 2.4.

    Download the Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation Template

    “Marketing should quantify its contribution to the business. One metric many clients have found valuable is Marketing Influenced Wins (MIW). Measured by what % of sales wins had a last-touch marketing attribution, marketers in the 30% – 40% MIW range are performing well.” (SoftwareReviews Advisory Research)

    Step 2.5

    Develop Initial Budgets Across All Areas

    Activities
    • 2.5.1 Use the Go-to-Market Budget Workbook and work with your workstream leads.
      • Capture the costs associated with this GTM Strategy and Launch.
      • Summarize your GTM budget in the Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation, including the details behind the gross margin calculation for your GTM Strategy/campaign if required.

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Field marketing, product marketing, creative, others to identify the specific budget elements needed for this campaign/launch

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Project lead
    • Field Marketing
    • Product Marketing
    • Branding/creative

    Outcomes of this step

    • The initial marketing budget for this campaign/launch

    Phase 2 – Validate designs with buyers and solidify product business case

    Step 2.1 Step 2.2 Step 2.3 Step 2.4 Step 2.5 Step 2.6 Step 2.7

    Download the Go-to-Market Strategy Cost Budget and Revenue Forecast Workbook

    2.5.1 Develop your GTM Strategy/product launch campaign budget

    Goal: Work with your workstream leads to identify all incremental costs associated with this GTM strategy and product launch

    1. Use the Go-to-Market Budget Workbook and adjust to include the areas that are identified by your workstream leads as being applicable to this GTM Strategy and Launch.
      • These should be incremental costs to normal operating and capital budgets and those areas that are fully approved for inclusion by your Steering Committee/Sponsoring Executive.
    2. Begin to Catalog all applicable costs to include all key areas such as:
      • Technology costs for internal use (typically from Marketing Ops), and “core” to product technology costs working with the product team
      • Channel marketing programs, agency (e.g. branding, naming, web design, SEO, content marketing, etc.), T&E, paid media, events, marketing assets, etc.
    3. Note that in the Align Step – Step 3, you will see your workstream leads each develop their individual contributions to both the launch plan as well a budget.

    4. Summarize your initial GTM budget findings in the Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation, including the details behind the gross margin calculation for your GTM Strategy/campaign if required. Again, you will flush out the final costs within each workstream areas in Phase 3, ”Align.”

    Download the Go-to-Market Strategy Cost Budget and Revenue Forecast Workbook

    Download the Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation Template

    Step 2.6

    Draft Initial Product Business Case

    Activities
    • 2.6.1 Here’s where you begin to pull together all the essential elements of your final business case.
      • For many organizations that require a view of return on investment, you will begin here to shape the key elements that your organization requires for a complete business case to go ahead with the needed investments.
      • The goal is to compare estimated costs to estimated revenues to ensure acceptable margins will be delivered for this GTM strategy/product launch.
      • The culmination of work to get to this calculation will continue through Phase 3; however, the following slide illustrates the kind of visualization that will be possible with our approach.

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • A product revenue forecast is created, alignment with sales/sales targets is created for a minimum viable product (MVP) that meets the buyer’s needs at the price point established/validated

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Project lead
    • Product management
    • Product marketing
    • Sales leadership

    Outcomes of this step

    • The important measures of:
      • Product revenue forecast
      • Supported MVP features

    Phase 2 – Validate designs with buyers and solidify product business case

    Step 2.1 Step 2.2 Step 2.3 Step 2.4 Step 2.5 Step 2.6 Step 2.7

    Gross Margin Estimates – part of a complete product business case

    Your goal: Earn more than you spend! This projection of estimated gross margins should be part of your product launch business case. The GTM initiative lead and workstream leads are charged with estimating incremental costs, and product and sales must work together on the revenue forecast.

    Net Return

    We estimate our 12 month gross profit to be ….

    Quarterly Revenues

    Based on sales forecast, our quarterly/monthly revenues are ….

    Estimated Expenses

    Incremental up-front costs are expected to be ….

    Example 'P&L waterfall for Product X Launch' with notes. Green bars are 'Increase', red bars are 'Decrease', and blue bars are 'Total'. Red bar note: 'Your estimated incremental up-front costs', Green bar note: 'Your estimated net incremental revenues vs. costs', Blue bar note: 'Your estimated net gross profit for this product launch and campaign', 'END' note: 'Extend for suitable period'.

    2.6.1 Develop your initial product business case

    Goal: Focused on the Product Concept areas related to product Market Fit, Buyer Needs and Market Opportunity, Product Managers will summarize in order to gain approval for Build

    1. Using the Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation, product managers should ensure the product concept slide(s) support the rationale to move to Build phase. Key areas include:
      1. Adequate market opportunity size – that is worth the incremental investment
      2. Acceptable costs/investment to pursue the opportunity – design, creative services for branding, web design, product naming, asset creation, copywriting, translation services not available in-house
      3. Well-defined product market fit – review buyer interviews that identify buyer pain points and ideas that will deliver needed business value
      4. Buyer-validated commercials – buyer-validated pricing and packaging
      5. Product development budget and staffing support to build viable MVP & beyond roadmap – development budget and staffing is in place/budgeted to deliver MVP by target date and continue to ensure attainment of product revenue targets
      6. Unique product value proposition that is competitively differentiated – to drive acceptable win rates
      7. Product Sales Forecast – that when compared to costs meets company investment hurdle rates
      8. Sales Leadership support for achieving sales forecast and supported sales/channel resourcing plan – sales leadership has taken on forecasted revenues as an incremental sales quota and has budget for additional hiring, enablement, and training for attainment.
    2. Go to the Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation and complete the slides summarizing these key areas that support the business case for the next phases of Build and Launch.

    Product Business Case Checklist:

    • Acceptably large enough product market opportunity
    • Well-defined competitive differentiation
    • Buyer-validated product-market fit
    • Buyer-validated and competitive commercials (i.e. pricing, packaging)
    • An MVP with roadmap that aligns to buyer needs and buyer-validated price points
    • A 24–36 month sales forecast with CRO sign-up and support for attainment
    • Costs of launch vs. forecasted revenues to gauge gross margins

    Download the Go-to-Market Strategy Cost Budget and Revenue Forecast Workbook

    Download the Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation Template

    Step 2.7

    Update the GTM Strategy Presentation Deck for Executive Review and Sign-off

    Activities
    • 2.7.1 Update the deck with Phase 2 findings culminating in the business case.

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Drop into the GTM Strategy deck the summary findings from the team’s work
    • Write an executive summary that garners executive support for needed funds, signed-up-for sales targets, agreed upon launch timing
    • Steering Committee alignment on above and next steps

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Project lead
    • Steering Committee
    • Workstream leads

    Outcomes of this step

    • Executive support for the GTM Strategy plan and approval to proceed to Phase 3

    Phase 2 – Validate designs with buyers and solidify product business case

    Step 2.1 Step 2.2 Step 2.3 Step 2.4 Step 2.5 Step 2.6 Step 2.7

    2.7.1 Update your GTM Strategy deck for Design Steering Committee approval

    1. As you near completion of the Go-to-Market Strategy Phase – Design Step, while your emerging business case is important, it will be finalized in the Align Step.
    2. An important test to pass before proceeding to the Align step of the GTM Strategy, is to answer several key questions:
      1. Have you validated the product value proposition with buyers?
      2. Is the competitive differentiation clear for this offering?
      3. Did Sales support the business case by signing up for the incremental quota?
      4. Has product defined an MVP that aligns with the buyer value needed to drive purchases?
      • If the answer is “no” you need to return to these steps and ensure completion
    3. Pull together a summary review deck, schedule a meeting with the Steering Committee, and present to-date findings for approval to move onto Phase 3.

    Download the Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation Template

    Sample of the 'PLAN' section of the GTM Strategy optimization diagram with 'GTM Design Review' circled in red.

    The presentation you create contains:

    • Timelines and a work plan
    • Expanded product concept to include your packaging and pricing approach
    • Feedback from buyers on validated product concept especially commercial elements
    • Expanded campaign plan and marketing budget
    • Initial product business case

    Build a More Effective Go-to-Market Strategy

    Phase 3

    Align stakeholder plans to prep for build

    Phase 1

    1.1 Select Steering Cmte/team, build aligned vision for GTM

    1.2 Buyer personas, journey, initial messaging

    1.3 Build initial product hypothesis

    1.4 Size market opportunity

    1.5 Outline digital/tech requirements

    1.6 Competitive SWOT

    1.7 Select routes to market

    1.8 Craft GTM Strategy deck

    Phase 2

    2.1 Brand consistency check

    2.2 Formulate packaging and pricing

    2.3 Craft buyer-valid product concept

    2.4 Build campaign plan and targets

    2.5 Develop cost budgets across all areas

    2.6 Draft product business case

    2.7 Update GTM Strategy deck

    Phase 3

    3.1 Assess tech/tools support for all GTM phases

    3.2 Outline sales enablement and Customer Success plan

    3.3 Build awareness plan

    3.4 Finalize business case

    3.5 Final GTM Plan deck

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    1. Assess tech/tools support for all GTM phases
    2. Map lead generation plan
    3. Outline Customer Success plan
    4. Build awareness plan (PR/AR, etc.)
    5. Finalize product business case
    6. Final GTM planning deck and Steering Committee review

    This phase involves the following stakeholders:

    • Steering Committee
    • Working group leaders

    To complete this phase, you will need:

    Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation Template Go-to-Market Strategy Cost Budget and Revenue Forecast Workbook
    Sample of the Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation Template deliverable. Sample of the Go-to-Market Strategy Cost Budget and Revenue Forecast Workbook deliverable.
    Use the Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation Template to document the results from the following activities:
    • Documenting your GTM Strategy Stakeholders
    • Documenting your GTM Strategy Working Team
    Use the Go-to-Market Cost Budget and Revenue Forecast Workbook to:
    • Tally budgets from across key functions involved in the GTM Strategy
    • Compare with forecasted revenues to assess gross margins

    Step 3.1

    Assess Technology and Tools Support for Your GTM Strategy as Well as Future Phases of GTM

    Activities
    • 3.1.1 Have Marketing Operations document what tech stack improvements are required in order to get the team to a successful launch. Understand costs and implementation timelines and work it into the Go-to-Market Budget Workbook.

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • After completing your initial survey in Step 1, complete requirements building for needed technology and tools acquisition/upgrade in campaign management, sales opportunity management, and analytics.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Project lead
    • Marketing operations/digital
    • IT

    Outcomes of this step

    • Build a business requirement against which to evaluate new/upgraded vendor tools to support the entire GTM process

    Phase 3 – Align functional plans with a compelling business case for product build

    Step 3.1 Step 3.2 Step 3.3 Step 3.4 Step 3.5

    3.1.1 Technology plan and investments

    Goal: Outline the results of our analysis and Info-Tech analyst guidance regarding supporting systems, tools, and technologies to support our go-to-market strategy

    1. Plans, timings, and incremental costs related to, but not limited to, the following apps/tools/technologies:
      1. Lead management/Marketing automation
      2. Marketing analytics
      3. Sales Opportunity Management System (OMS) and Configure, Price, and Quote (CPQ) applications
      4. Sales engagement
      5. Sales analytics
      6. Customer service and support/Customer interaction hub
      7. Customer data management and analytics
      8. Customer experience platforms
      9. Marketing content management
      10. Creative tools
      11. Share of voice and social platform management
      12. Etc.
    2. Go to the Go-to-Market Budget Workbook and complete by adding costs identified in above areas that are specific to this go-to-market strategy, Build, and Launch initiative. Record in the Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation completing the areas within the slides related to the Product and Launch Concepts and Business Case.

    Download the Go-to-Market Strategy Cost Budget and Revenue Forecast Workbook

    Download the Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation Template

    Step 3.2

    Outline Sales Enablement and Support for Customer Success to Include Onboarding and Ongoing Engagement

    Activities
    • 3.3.1 Sales Enablement – develop the sales enablement and training plan for Launch to include activities, responsible parties, dates for delivery, etc.

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Finalize the customer success training and support plan
    • Onboarding scripts
    • Changes to help screens in application
    • Timing to plan for Quality Acceptance

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Project lead
    • Customer Success lead
    • Product management
    • Product marketing

    Outcomes of this step

    • Plan for creation of copy, assets, and rollout pan to support clients and client segments for Launch

    Phase 3 – Align functional plans with a compelling business case for product build

    Step 3.1 Step 3.2 Step 3.3 Step 3.4 Step 3.5

    3.2.1 Outline sales enablement

    Goal: Outline sales collateral, updates to sales proposals, CPQ, Opportunity Management Systems, and sales training

    1. Describe the requirements for sales enablement to include elements such as:
      1. Sales collateral
      2. Client-facing presentations
      3. Sales proposal updates
      4. Updates to Configure, Price, and Quote (CPQ) applications
      5. Updates to Opportunity Management System (OMS) applications
      6. Sales demo versions of the new product
      7. Sales communication plans
      8. Sales training and certification programs
    2. Go to the Go-to-Market Budget Workbook and add the costs identified in above areas that are specific to this go-to-market strategy, Build, and Launch initiative. Record as well in the Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation completing the areas within the slides related to the Product and Launch Concepts and Business Case.

    Download the Go-to-Market Strategy Cost Budget and Revenue Forecast Workbook

    Download the Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation Template

    3.2.2 Outline customer success

    Goal: Outline customer support/success requirements and plan

    1. Plans, timings, and incremental costs for the following:
      1. Onboarding scripts for the new solution
      2. Updates to retention lifecycle
      3. FAQ answers
      4. Updates to online help/support system
      5. “How-to” videos
      6. Live chat updates
      7. Updates to “provide feedback” system
      8. Updates to Quarterly Business Review slides
    2. Go to the Go-to-Market Budget Workbook and add the costs identified in above areas that are specific to this go-to-market strategy, Build, and Launch initiative. Record in the Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation and complete the areas within the slides related to the Product and Launch Concepts and Business Case.

    Download the Go-to-Market Strategy Cost Budget and Revenue Forecast Workbook

    Download the Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation Template

    Step 3.3

    Build an Awareness Plan Covering Media, Social Media, and Industry Analysts

    Activities
    • 3.4.1 Corp Comms/PR/AR – develop the overall awareness plans for executive interviews, articles placed, social drops, analyst briefing dates, and internal associate comms if required.

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Outline outbound communications plans including press releases, social posts, etc.
    • Describe dates for AR outreach to covering analysts
    • Develop the internal communications plan

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Project lead
    • Corporate Comms lead
    • Creative
    • Analyst relations
    • Social media marketing lead

    Outcomes of this step

    • Plan for creation of copy, assets, and rollout pan to support awareness building, external communications, and internal communications if required

    Phase 3 – Align functional plans with a compelling business case for product build

    Step 3.1 Step 3.2 Step 3.3 Step 3.4 Step 3.5

    3.3.1 Internal communications plan

    Goal: Outline complete internal communications plan. For large-scale changes (i.e. rebranding, M&A, etc.) HR may drive significant volume of employee communications working with Corporate Comms

    1. Plans, timings, and incremental costs for the following:
      1. Complete a comms plan with dates, messages, and channels
      2. Team member roles and responsibilities
      3. Intranet article and posting schedules
      4. Creation of new office signage, merchandise, etc. for employee kits
      5. Pre-launch announcements schedule
      6. Launch day communications, events, and activities
      7. Post launch update schedule and messages for launch success
      8. Incremental staffing and resources/budget requirements
    2. Go to the Go-to-Market Budget Workbook and add costs identified in above areas that are specific to this go-to-market strategy, Build, and Launch initiative. Record as well in the Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation completing the areas related to the Product and Launch Concepts and Business Case.

    Download the Go-to-Market Strategy Cost Budget and Revenue Forecast Workbook

    Download the Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation Template

    3.3.2 PR and External Communications Plan

    Goal: Outline complete internal communications plan. For large scale changes (i.e. rebranding, M&A, etc.) HR may drive significant volume of employee communications working with Corporate Comms

    1. Plans, timings, and incremental costs for the following:
      1. List of Tier 1 and Tier 2 media authors covering the [product/initiative] market area
      2. Schedule of launch briefings, with any non-analyst influencers
      3. Timing of press releases
      4. Required supporting executives and stakeholders for each of the above meetings
      5. Slide deck/media kit for the above and planned questions to support needed feedback
      6. Media Site materials especially to support media questions and requests for briefings
      7. Social postings calendar of activities and key messages plan
      8. Publish data of [product/initiative] relevant articles with set-back schedules
      9. Cultivation of reference customers and client testimonials for media outreach
      10. Requirements for additional staffing to cover product/initiative new market and analysts
      11. Internal and external events calendar to invite media
    2. Go to the Go-to-Market Budget Workbook and add the costs identified in the above areas that are specific to this go-to-market strategy, Build, and Launch initiative. Record in the Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation by completing the areas related to the Product and Launch Concepts and Business Case.

    Download the Go-to-Market Strategy Cost Budget and Revenue Forecast Workbook

    Download the Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation Template

    3.3.3 Analyst relations plan

    Goal: Outline incremental costs in analyst communications, engagement, and access to research

    1. Plans, timings, and incremental costs for the following:
      1. List of Tier 1 and Tier 2 analysts for the [product/initiative] market area
      2. Schedule of inquiries, pre-launch briefings, launch briefings, and post-launch feedback
      3. Required supporting executives and stakeholders for each of the above meetings
      4. Analyst deck for each of the above and planned questions to support needed feedback
      5. Analyst Site materials to support 2nd and 3rd Tier analysts’ questions and requests for briefings
      6. Social postings calendar of activities and key messages
      7. Resources to respond to analyst blogs and/or social posts regarding your product/initiative area
      8. Timing of important and relevant analyst document/methodology publishing dates with set-back schedules
      9. Cultivation of reference customers and client testimonials to coincide with analyst outreach for research and for buyer review sites/reviews data gathering
      10. Requirements for additional staffing to cover product/initiative new market and analysts
      11. Events calendar where analysts will be presenting on this product/initiative market
    2. Go to the Go-to-Market Budget Workbook and add the costs identified in the above areas that are specific to this go-to-market strategy, Build and Launch initiative. Record in the Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation by completing the areas related to the Product and Launch Concepts and Business Case.

    Download the Go-to-Market Strategy Cost Budget and Revenue Forecast Workbook

    Download the Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation Template

    Step 3.4

    Finalize Product Business Case With Collaborative Input From Product, Sales, and Marketing

    Activities
    • 3.5.1 Convene the team to align sales, marketing, and product around the business case.

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Refine the product business case initiated in Phase 2
    • Align product revenue forecast with sales revenue forecast
    • Align MVP features to be developed during “GTM – Build” with customer validated product-market fit

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Project lead
    • Product management
    • Product marketing

    Outcomes of this step

    • Product business case

    Phase 3 – Align functional plans with a compelling business case for product build

    Step 3.1 Step 3.2 Step 3.3 Step 3.4 Step 3.5

    3.4.1 Final product Build and Launch business case

    Goal: Beyond the product business case, factor in costs for technology, campaigning, sales enablement, and customer success in order to gain approval for Build and Launch

    1. Using the Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation, workstream leads and Go-to-Market Initiative leaders will finalize the anticipated incremental costs, and when compared to projected product revenues, present to the Steering Committee including CFO for final approval before moving to Build and Launch.
    2. To present a complete business case, key cost areas include:
      1. All the areas outlined up through Step 3.4 plus:
      2. Technology/MarTech Stack incremental costs
      3. Channel programs, branding/agency, pricing, packaging/product, and T&E incremental costs
      4. Campaign related – creative, content marketing, paid media, events, SEO, lists/data
      5. Sales Enablement, Customer Support/Success incremental costs
      6. Internal communications/events/activities/signage costs
      7. PR/AR/Media incremental costs
    3. Compare to final Sales/Product agreed projected revenues, in order to calculate estimated gross margins

    Go to the Go-to-Market Budget Workbook as outlined in prior steps and document final incremental costs and projected revenues and summarize within the Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation.

    Download the Go-to-Market Strategy Cost Budget and Revenue Forecast Workbook

    Download the Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation Template

    Product Build and Launch Business Case Checklist:

    • Acceptably large enough product market opportunity
    • Well-defined competitive differentiation
    • Buyer-validated product-market fit
    • Buyer-validated and competitive commercials (i.e. pricing, packaging)
    • An MVP with roadmap that aligns with buyer needs and buyer validated price points
    • A 24–36 month sales forecast with CRO sign-up and support for attainment
    • Incremental product development, tech, marketing, sales, customer success, AR/PR costs vs. forecasted revenues fall within acceptable margins

    Step 3.5

    Develop Your Final Executive Presentation to Request Approval and Proceed to GTM Build Phase

    Activities
    • 3.6.1 Update the Product, Launch, Journey, and Business Case slides included within the Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation Template with Phase 3 findings culminating in the business case.

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Update the previously created slides with findings from Phase 3
    • Hold a Steering Committee meeting and present findings for approval

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Steering Committee
    • Workstream leads

    Outcomes of this step

    • GTM Strategy approved to move to GTM Build

    Phase 3 – Align functional plans with a compelling business case for product build

    Step 3.1 Step 3.2 Step 3.3 Step 3.4 Step 3.5

    3.5.1 Update your GTM Strategy deck for Align Steering Committee approval

    1. As you near completion of the Go-to-Market Strategy Phase – Align Step, an important test to pass before proceeding to the Design step of GTM Strategy, is to answer several key questions:
      1. Are Sales, Product, and Marketing all aligned and in agreement on the business case?
      2. Are the gross margin calculations acceptable to the Steering Committee? CFO? CEO?
    2. If the answer is “no” you need to return to prior steps and ensure completion.
    3. Pull together a summary review deck, schedule a meeting with the Steering Committee, present to-date findings for approval to move on to Build Phase.
    4. Once your final business case is accepted, you are ready to move on to the GTM Build and Launch phases. These phases are covered in sperate SoftwareReviews blueprints.

    Download the Go-to-Market Strategy Presentation Template

    Sample of the 'PLAN' section of the GTM Strategy optimization diagram with 'GTM Align Review' circled in red.

    The presentation you create contains:

    • Timelines and work plan updates
    • Tech stack needs/modifications
    • An expanded product concept to include packaging and pricing approach
    • Asset-type concepts for marketing campaigns, sales collateral, website, and social
    • Outline of initial Launch dates
    • Outline of initial customer success, awareness/PR/AR plans, and sales training plans
    • Final business case

    Summary of Accomplishment

    Problem Solved – A More Effective Go-to-Market Strategy

    By guiding your team through the Go-to-Market planning process applied to an actual GTM Strategy, you have built an important set of capabilities that underpins today’s well-managed software companies. By following the step-by-step process outlined in this blueprint, you have delivered a host of benefits that include the following:

    • Alignment of Product, Marketing, Sales, and Customer Success around a deeper understanding of your target buyers and what it takes to build competitive differentiation.
    • You have calculated your product market opportunity and whether it’s worth the investment in the long-term, and for the short term you have estimated gross margins as an important part of the business case.
    • Built executive support and confidence by leading a disparate team in complex decision making that is fact and evidence based to make more effective go/no go decisions related to investing in new products.
    • And finally, because you and your team have demonstrated their ability to align programs toward a common goal and program-manage a complex initiative through to successful completion, you have led your team to develop the “institutional muscle” to take on equally complex initiatives such as acquisition integration, rebranding, launching in a new region, etc.

    Therefore, developing the capabilities to manage a complex go-to-market strategy is akin to building company scalability and is sought after as a professional development opportunity that each executive should have on his/her résumé.

    If you would like additional support, contact us and we’ll make sure you get the professional expertise you need.

    Contact your account representative for more information.

    info@softwarereviews.com 1-888-670-8889

    Bibliography

    Acosta, Danette. “Average Customer Retention Rate by Industry.” Profitwell.com. Accessed Jan. 2022.

    Ashkenas, Ron, and Patrick Finn. “The Go-To-Market Approach Startups Need to Adopt.” Harvard Business Review, June 2016. Accessed Jun. 2021.

    Bilardi, Emma. “ How to Create Buyer Personas.” Product Marketing Alliance, July 2020. Accessed Dec. 2021.

    Cespedes, Frank V. “Defining a Post-Pandemic Channel Strategy.” Harvard Business Review, Apr. 2021. Accessed Jul. 2021.

    Chapman, Lawrence. “A Visual Guide to Product Launches.” Product Marketing Alliance. Accessed Jul. 2021.

    Chapman, Lawrence. “Everything You Need To Know About Go-To-Market Strategies.” Product Marketing Alliance. Accessed Jul. 2021.

    Christiansen, Clayton. “The Innovators Dilemma.” Harvard Business School Press, 1997.

    Drzewicki, Matt. “Digital Marketing Maturity: The Path to Success.” MIT Sloan Management Review. Accessed Dec. 2021.

    “Go-To-Market Refresher,” Product Marketing Alliance. Accessed Jul. 2021

    Harrison, Liz; Dennis Spillecke, Jennifer Stanley, and Jenny Tsai. “Omnichannel in B2B sales: The new normal in a year that has been anything but.” McKinsey & Company, 15 March, 2021. Accessed Dec. 2021.

    Jansen, Hasse. “Buyer Personas – 33 Mind Blowing Stats.” Boardview, 19 Feb. 2016. Accessed Jan. 2022.

    Scott, Ryan. “Creating a Brand Identity: 20 Questions to Consider.” Lean Labs, Jun 2021. Accessed Jul. 2021.

    Smith, Michael L., and James Erwin. “Role and Responsibility Charting (RACI).” DOCSearch. Accessed Jan. 2022. Web.

    “What is the Total Addressable Market (TAM).” Corporate Finance Institute (CFI), n.d. Accessed Jan. 2022.

    Related Software Reviews Research

    Sample of the Create a Buyer Persona and Journey research Create a Buyer Persona and Journey
    • A successful go-to-market strategy depends upon deep buyer understanding. Our Create a Buyer Persona and Journey blueprint will give you a step-by-step process that when followed will provide you and your team with that deep buyer understanding you need.
    • The Create a Buyer Persona and Journey blueprint provides you with an interview containing over 75 questions that, after capturing buyer answers and insights during interviews, will strengthen your value proposition, product market fit, lead gen engine and sales effectiveness.
    Sample of the Optimize Lead Generation With Lead Scoring research Optimize Lead Generation With Lead Scoring
    • Save time and money and improve your sales win rates when you apply our methodology to score contacts with your lead gen engine more accurately and pass better qualified leads over to your sellers.
    • Our methodology teaches marketers to develop your own lead scoring approach based upon lead/contact profile vs. your Ideal Customer Profile (ICP) and scores contact engagement. Applying the methodology to arrive at your own approach to scoring will mean reduced lead gen costs, higher conversion rates, and increased marketing influenced wins.

    Build an Application Rationalization Framework

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}173|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.2/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $39,942 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 23 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Architecture & Strategy
    • Parent Category Link: /architecture-and-strategy
    • Almost two-thirds of organizations report that they have too many or far too many applications due to sprawl from poorly managed portfolios, and application managers are spending too much time supporting non-critical applications and not enough time on their most vital ones.
    • The necessary pieces of rationalization are rarely in one place. You need to assemble the resources to collect vital rationalization criteria.
    • There is a lack of standard practices to define the business value that the applications in a portfolio provide, and without value rationalization, decisions are misaligned to business needs.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    There is no “one size fits all.” Applying a rigid approach to rationalization with inflexible inputs can delay or prevent you from realizing value. Play to your strengths and build a framework that aligns to your goals and limitations.

    Impact and Result

    • Define the roles, responsibilities, and outputs for application rationalization within your application portfolio management practice.
    • Build a tailored application rationalization framework (ARF) aligned with your motivations, goals, and limitations.
    • Apply the various application assessments to produce the information that your dispositions will be based on.
    • Initiate an application portfolio roadmap that will showcase your rationalization decisions to key stakeholders.

    Build an Application Rationalization Framework Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should rationalize your applications and why you need a framework that is specific to your goals and limitations, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Lay your foundations

    Define the motivations, goals, and scope of your rationalization effort. Build the action plan and engagement tactics to roll out the rationalization activities.

    • Build an Application Rationalization Framework – Phase 1: Lay Your Foundations
    • Application Rationalization Tool

    2. Plan your application rationalization framework

    Understand the core assessments performed in application rationalizations. Define your application rationalization framework and degree of rigor in applying these assessments based on your goals and limitations.

    • Build an Application Rationalization Framework – Phase 2: Plan Your Application Rationalization Framework

    3. Test and adapt your application rationalization framework

    Test your application rationalization framework using Info-Tech’s tool set on your first iteration. Perform a retrospective and adapt your framework based on that experience and outcomes.

    • Build an Application Rationalization Framework – Phase 3: Test and Adapt Your Application Rationalization Framework
    • Application TCO Calculator
    • Value Calculator

    4. Initiate your roadmap

    Review, determine, and prioritize your dispositions to ensure they align to your goals. Initiate an application portfolio roadmap to showcase your rationalization decisions to key stakeholders.

    • Build an Application Rationalization Framework – Phase 4: Initiate Your Roadmap
    • Disposition Prioritization Tool
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Build an Application Rationalization Framework

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Lay Your Foundations

    The Purpose

    Define the goals, scope, roles, and responsibilities of your rationalization effort.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Defined motivations, long and short-term goals, and metrics for your rationalization effort.

    Definition of application.

    Defined roles and responsibilities for your rationalization effort.

    Activities

    1.1 Define motivations and goals for rationalization.

    1.2 Define “application.”

    1.3 Identify team and responsivities.

    1.4 Adapt target dispositions.

    1.5 Initiate Application Rationalization Framework (ARF).

    Outputs

    Goals, motivations, and metrics for rationalizations

    Definition of “Application”

    Defined dispositions

    Defined core APM team and handoffs

    2 Assess Business Value

    The Purpose

    Review and adapt Info-Tech’s methodology and toolset.

    Assess business value of applications.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Tailored application rationalization framework

    Defined business value drivers

    Business value scores for applications

    Activities

    2.1 Review Application Rationalization Tool.

    2.2 Review focused apps, capabilities, and areas of functionality overlap.

    2.3 Define business value drivers.

    2.4 Determine the value score of focused apps.

    Outputs

    Application Rationalization Tool

    List of functional overlaps

    Weighed business value drivers

    Value scores for focused application

    Value Calculator

    3 Gather Application Information

    The Purpose

    Continue to review and adapt Info-Tech’s methodology and toolset.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Tailored application rationalization framework

    TCO values for applications

    Technical health review of applications

    Recommended dispositions for applications

    Activities

    3.1 Determine TCO for focused apps.

    3.2 Determine technical health of focused apps.

    3.3 Review APA.

    3.4 Review recommended dispositions.

    3.5 Perform retrospective of assessments and adapt ARF.

    Outputs

    TCO of focused applications

    TCO Calculator

    Technical health of focused apps

    Defined rationalization criteria

    Recommended disposition for focused apps

    4 Gather, Assess, and Select Dispositions

    The Purpose

    Review and perform high-level prioritization of dispositions.

    Build a roadmap for dispositions.

    Determine ongoing rationalization and application portfolio management activities.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Application Portfolio Roadmap

    Prioritized Dispositions

    Activities

    4.1 Determine dispositions.

    4.2 Prioritize dispositions.

    4.3 Initiate portfolio roadmap.

    4.4 Build an action plan for next iterations and ongoing activities.

    4.5 Finalize ARF.

    Outputs

    Disposition Prioritization Tool

    Application portfolio roadmap

    Action plan for next iterations and ongoing activities

    Further reading

    Build an Application Rationalization Framework

    Manage your application portfolio to minimize risk and maximize value.

    Analyst Perspective

    "You're not rationalizing for the sake of IT, you’re rationalizing your apps to create better outcomes for the business and your customers. Consider what’s in it for delivery, operations, the business, and the customer." – Cole Cioran, Senior Director – Research, Application Delivery and Management

    Our understanding of the problem

    This Research Is Designed For:

    • Application portfolio managers, application portfolio management (APM) teams, or any application leaders who are tasked with making application portfolio decisions.
    • Application leaders looking to align their portfolios to the organization’s strategy.
    • Application leaders who need a process for rationalizing their applications.

    This Research Will Help You:

    • Measure the business value of your applications.
    • Rationalize your portfolio to determine the best disposition for each application.
    • Initiate a roadmap that will showcase the future of your applications.

    This Research Will Also Assist:

    • CIOs and other business leaders who need to understand the applications in their portfolio, the value they contribute to the business, and their strategic direction over a given timeline.
    • Steering committees and/or the PMO that needs to understand the process by which application dispositions are generated.

    This Research Will Help Them:

    • Build their reputation as an IT leader who drives the business forward.
    • Define the organization’s value statement in the context of IT and their applications.
    • Visualize the roadmap to the organization’s target application landscape.

    Executive Summary

    Situation

    • Almost two-thirds of organizations report that they have too many or far too many applications due to sprawl from poorly managed portfolios (Flexera, 2015).
    • Application managers are spending too much time supporting non-critical applications and not enough time on their most vital ones.
    • Application managers need their portfolios to be current and effective and evolve continuously to support the business or risk being marginalized.

    Complication

    • The necessary pieces of rationalization are rarely in one place. You need to assemble the resources to collect vital rationalization criteria.
    • There is a lack of standard practices to define the business value that the applications in a portfolio provide and, without value rationalization, decisions are misaligned to business needs.

    Resolution

    • Define the roles, responsibilities, and outputs for application rationalization within your application portfolio management (APM) and other related practices.
    • Build a tailored application rationalization framework (ARF) aligned with your motivations, goals, and limitations.
    • Apply the various application assessments to produce the information, which your dispositions will be based on, and adapt your ARF based on the experiences of your first iteration.
    • Review, determine, and prioritize your application dispositions to create a portfolio strategy aligned to your goals.
    • Initiate an application portfolio roadmap, which will showcase your rationalization decisions to key stakeholders.

    Info-Tech Insight

    There is no one size fits all.

    Applying a rigid approach with inflexible inputs can delay or prevent you from realizing value. Play to your strengths and build a framework that aligns to your goals and limitations.

    Business value must drive your decisions.

    Of the 11 vendor capabilities asked about by Info-Tech’s SoftwareReviews, “business value created” has the second highest relationship with overall software satisfaction.

    Take an iterative approach.

    Larger approaches take longer and are more likely to fail. Identify the applications that best address your strategic objectives, then: rationalize, learn, repeat.

    Info-Tech recommends a disciplined, step-by-step approach as outlined in our Application Portfolio Strategy Program

    Step 1 "No Knowledge": Define application capabilities and visualize lifecycle stages

    Application Discovery

    1. Build in Application Portfolio Management Principles.
    2. Conduct Application Alignment.
    3. Build Detailed Application Inventory

    Step 2 "No Strategy": Rationalize application portfolio and visualize strategic directions

    Application Rationalization

    1. Set Your Rationalization Framework
    2. Conduct Assessment & Assign Dispositions
    3. Create an Application Portfolio Roadmap

    Step 3 "No Plan": Build a product roadmap and visualize the detailed plan

    Detailed Disposition Planning

    1. Conduct an Impact Assessment
    2. Determine the Details of the Disposition
    3. Create Detailed Product Roadmaps

    This blueprint focuses on step 2 of Info-Tech's Application Portfolio Strategy Program. Our methodology assumes you have completed the following activities, which are outlined in Discover Your Applications.

    • Collected your full application inventory (including Shadow IT)
    • Aligned applications to business capabilities
    • Determined redundant applications
    • Identified appropriate subject matter experts (business and technical) for your applications

    Info-Tech's four-phase methodology

    Phase 1

    Lay Your Foundations

    • Define Motivations, Goals, and Scope
    • Iteration and Engagement Planning

    This phase is intended to establish the fundamentals in launching either a rationalization initiative or ongoing practice.

    Here we define goals, scope, and the involvement of various roles from both IT and the business.

    Phase 2

    Plan Your ARF

    • Establish Rationalization Inputs and Current Gaps

    This phase is intended to review a high-level approach to rationalization and determine which analyses are necessary and their appropriate level of depth.

    Here we produce an initial ARF and discuss any gaps in terms of the availability of necessary data points and additional collection methods that will need to be applied.

    Phase 3

    Test and Adapt Your ARF

    • Perform First Iteration Analysis
    • First Iteration Retrospective and Adaptation

    This phase is intended to put the ARF into action and adapt as necessary to ensure success in your organization.

    If appropriate, here we apply Info-Tech’s ARF and toolset and test it against a set of applications to determine how best to adapt these materials for your needs.

    Phase 4

    Initiate Your Roadmap

    • Prioritize and Roadmap Applications
    • Ongoing Rationalization and Roadmapping

    This phase is intended to capture results of rationalization and solidify your rationalization initiative or ongoing practice.

    Here we aim to inject your dispositions into an application portfolio roadmap and ensure ongoing governance of APM activities.

    There is an inconsistent understanding and ownership of the application portfolio

    What can I discover about my portfolio?

    Application portfolios are misunderstood.

    Portfolios are viewed as only supportive in nature. There is no strategy or process to evaluate application portfolios effectively. As a result, organizations build a roadmap with a lack of understanding of their portfolio.

    72% of organizations do not have an excellent understanding of the application portfolio (Capgemini).

    How can I improve my portfolio?

    Misalignment between Applications and Business Operations

    Applications fail to meet their intended function, resulting in duplication, a waste of resources, and a decrease in ROI. This makes it harder for IT to justify to the business the reasons to complete a roadmap.

    48% of organizations believe that there are more applications than the business requires (Capgemini).

    How can my portfolio help transform the business?

    IT's budget is to keep the lights on.

    The application portfolio is complex and pervasive and requires constant support from IT. This makes it increasingly difficult for IT to adopt or develop new strategies since its immediate goal will always be to fix what already exists. This causes large delays and breaks in the timeline to complete a roadmap.

    68% of IT directors have wasted time and money because they did not have better visibility of application roadmaps (ComputerWeekly).

    Roadmaps can be the solution, but stall when they lack the information needed for good decision making

    An application portfolio roadmap provides a visual representation of your application portfolio, is used to plan out the portfolio’s strategy over a given time frame, and assists management in key decisions. But…

    • You can’t change an app without knowing its backend.
    • You can't rationalize what you don't know.
    • You can’t confirm redundancies without knowing every app.
    • You can’t rationalize without the business perspective.

    A roadmap is meaningless if you haven’t done any analysis to understand the multiple perspectives on your applications.

    Application rationalization ensures roadmaps reflect what the business actually wants and needs

    Application rationalization is the practice of strategically identifying business applications across an organization to determine which applications should be kept, replaced, retired, or consolidated (TechTarget).

    Discover, Improve, and Transform Through Application Rationalization

    Your application rationalization effort increases the maturity of your roadmap efforts by increasing value to the business. Go beyond the discover phase – leverage application rationalization insights to reach the improve and transform phases.

    Strong Apps Are Key to Business Satisfaction

    79% of organizations with high application suite satisfaction believe that IT offers the organization a competitive edge over others in the industry. (Info-Tech Research Group, N=230)

    Info-Tech Insight

    Companies with an effective portfolio are twice as likely to report high-quality applications, four times as likely to report high proficiency in legacy apps management, and six times as likely to report strong business alignment.

    Rationalization comes at a justified cost

    Rationalization can reduce costs and drive innovation

    Projecting the ROI of application rationalization is difficult and dangerous when used as the only marker for success.

    However, rationalization, when done effectively, will help drop operational or maintenance costs of your applications as well as provide many more opportunities to add value to the business.

    A graph with Time on the X-axis and Cost on the Y axis. The graph compares cost before rationalization, where the cost of the existing portfolio is high, with cost after rationalization, where the cost of the existing portfolio is reduced. The graph demonstrates a decrease in overall portfolio spend after rationalization

    Organizations lack a strategic approach to application rationalization, leading to failure

    IT leaders strive to push the business forward but are stuck in a cycle of reaction where they manage short-term needs rather than strategic approaches.

    Why Is This the Case?

    Lack of Relevant Information

    Rationalization fails without appropriately detailed, accurate, and up-to-date information. You need to identify what information is available and assemble the teams to collect and analyze it.

    Failure to Align With Business Objectives

    Rationalization fails when you lack a clear list of strategic and collaborative priorities; priorities need to be both IT and non-IT related to align with the business objectives and provide value.

    IT Leaders Fails to Justify Projects

    Adhering to a rigid rationalization process can be complex and costly. Play to your strengths and build an ARF based on your goals and limitations.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Misaligned portfolio roadmaps are known to lead teams and projects into failure!
    Building an up-to-date portfolio roadmap that aligns business objectives to IT objectives will increase approval and help the business see the long-term value of roadmapping.

    Don’t start in the middle; ensure you have the basics down

    Application portfolio strategy practice maturity stages

    1. Discover Your Applications
    2. Improve
    3. Transform
    A graph with Rigor of APM Practice on the X-axis and Value to the Business on the Y-axis. The content of the graph is split into the 3 maturity stages, Discover, Improve, and Transform. With each step, the Value to the Business and Rigor of APM Practice increase.

    Disambiguate your systems and clarify your scope

    Define the items that make up your portfolio.

    Broad or unclear definitions of “application” can complicate the scope of rationalization. Take the time to define an application and come to a common understanding of the systems which will be the focus of your rationalization effort.

    Bundling systems under common banner or taking a product view of your applications and components can be an effective way to ensure you include your full collection of systems, without having to perform too many individual assessments.

    Scope

    Single... Capability enabled by... Whole...
    Digital Product + Service Digital Platform Platform Portfolio Customer Facing
    Product (one or more apps) Product Family Product Portfolio

    Application Application Architecture Application Portfolio Internal

    A graphic listing the following products: UI, Applications, Middleware, Data, and Infrastructure. A banner reading APIs runs through all products, and UI, Applications, and Middleware are bracketed off as Application

    Info-Tech’s framework can be applied to portfolios of apps, products, and their related capabilities or services.

    However you organize your tech stack, Info-Tech’s application rationalization framework can be applied.

    Understand the multiple lenses of application rationalization and include in your framework

    There are many lenses to view your applications. Rationalize your applications using all perspectives to assess your portfolio and determine the most beneficial course of action.

    Application Alignment - Architect Perspective

    How well does the entire portfolio align to your business capabilities?

    Are there overlaps or redundancies in your application features?

    Covered in Discover Your Applications.

    Business Value - CEO Perspective

    Is the application producing sufficient business value?

    Does it impact profitability, enable capabilities, or add any critical factor that fulfills the mission and vision?

    TCO - CIO Perspective

    What is the overall cost of the application?

    What is the projected cost as your organization grows? What is the cost to maintain the application?

    End User

    How does the end user perceive the application?

    What is the user experience?

    Do the features adequately support the intended functions?

    Is the application important or does it have high utilization?

    Technical Value - App Team Perspective

    What is the state of the backend of the application?

    Has the application maintained sufficient code quality? Is the application reliable? How does it fit into your application architecture?

    Each perspective requires its own analysis and is an area of criteria for rationalization.

    Apply the appropriate amount of rigor for your ARF based on your specific goals and limitations

    Ideally, the richer the data the better the results, but the reality is in-depth analysis is challenging and you’ll need to play to your strengths to be successful.

    Light-Weight Assessment

    App to capability alignment.

    Determine overlaps.

    Subjective 1-10 scale

    Subjective T-shirt size (high, med., low)

    End-user surveys

    Performance temperature check

    Thorough Analysis

    App to process alignment.

    Determine redundancies.

    Apply a value measurement framework.

    Projected TCO with traceability to ALM & financial records.

    Custom build interviews with multiple end users

    Tool and metric-based analysis

    There is no one-size-fits all rationalization. The primary goal of this blueprint is to help you determine the appropriate level of analysis given your motivations and goals for this effort as well as the limitations of resources, timeline, and accessible information.

    Rationalize and build your application portfolio strategy the right way to ensure success

    Big-Bang Approach

    • An attempt to assess the whole portfolio at once.
    • The result is information overload.
    • Information gathered is likely incomplete and/or inaccurate.
    • Tangible benefits are a long time away.

    Covert Approach

    • Information is collected behind the scenes and whenever information sources are available.
    • Assumptions about the business use of applications go unconfirmed.

    Corner-of-the-Desk Approach

    • No one is explicitly dedicated to building a strategy or APM practices.
    • Information is collected whenever the application team has time available.
    • Benefits are pushed out and value is lost.

    Iterative Approach

    • Carried out in phases, concentrating on individual business units or subsets of applications.
    • Priority areas are completed first.
    • The APM practice strengthens through experience.

    Sponsored Mandate Approach

    • The appropriate business stakeholders participate.
    • Rationalization is given project sponsors who champion the practice and communicate the benefits across the organization.

    Dedicated Approach

    • Rationalization and other APM activities are given a budget and formal agenda.
    • Roles and responsibilities are assigned to team members.

    Use Info-Tech’s Application Portfolio Assessment Diagnostic to add the end users’ perspective to your decision making

    Prior to Blueprint: Call 1-888-670-8889 to inquire about or request the Application Portfolio Assessment.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    The approach in this blueprint has been designed in coordination with Info-Tech’s Application Portfolio Assessment (APA) Diagnostic. While it is not a prerequisite, your project will experience the best results and be completed much quicker by taking advantage of our diagnostic offering prior to initiating the activities in this blueprint.

    Use the program diagnostic to:

    • Assess the importance and satisfaction of enterprise applications.
    • Solicit feedback from your end users on applications being used.
    • Understand the strengths and weaknesses of your current applications.
    • Perform a high-level application rationalization initiative.

    Integrate diagnostic results to:

    • Target which applications to analyze in greater detail.
    • Expand on the initial application rationalization results with a more comprehensive and business-value-focused criteria.

    Use Info-Tech’s Application Rationalization Tool to determine and then visualize your application portfolio strategy

    At the center of this project is an Application Rationalization Tool that is used as a living document of your:

      1. Customizable Application Rationalization Framework

      2. Recommendation Dispositions

      3. Application Portfolio Roadmap (seen below)

    Use the step-by-step advice within this blueprint to rationalize your application portfolio and build a realistic and accurate application roadmap that drives business value.

    Central to our approach to application rationalization are industry-leading frameworks

    Info-Tech uses the APQC and COBIT5 frameworks for certain areas of this research. Contextualizing application rationalization within these frameworks clarifies its importance and role and ensures that our assessment tool is focused on key priority areas. The APQC and COBIT5 frameworks are used as a starting point for assessing application effectiveness within specific business capabilities of the different components of application rationalization.

    APQC is one of the world's leading proponents of business benchmarking, best practices, and knowledge management research.

    COBIT 5 is the leading framework for the governance and management of enterprise IT.

    In addition to industry-leading frameworks, our best-practice approach is enhanced by the insights and guidance from our analysts, industry experts, and our clients.

    Our peer network of over 33,000 happy clients proves the effectiveness of our research.

    Our team conducts 1,000+ hours of primary and secondary research to ensure that our approach is enhanced by best practices.

    A public utility organization is using Info-Tech’s approach for rationalization of its applications for reduced complexity

    Case Study

    Industry: Public Sector

    Source: Info-Tech Research Group

    Challenge

    • The public utility has a complex application portfolio, with a large number of applications custom-built that provide limited functionality to certain business groups.
    • The organization needed to move away from custom point solutions and adopt more hosted solutions to cater to larger audiences across business domains.
    • The organization required a comprehensive solution for the following:
      • Understanding how applications are being used by business users.
      • Unraveling the complexity of its application landscape using a formal rationalization process.

    Solution

    • The organization went through a rationalization process with Info-Tech in a four-day onsite engagement to determine the following:
      • Satisfaction level and quality evaluation of end users’ perception of application functionality.
      • Confirmation on what needs to be done with each application under assessment.
      • The level of impact the necessary changes required for a particular application would have on the greater app ecosystem.
      • Prioritization methodology for application roadmap implementation.

    Results

    • Info-Tech’s Application Portfolio Assessment Diagnostic report helped the public utility understand what applications users valued and found difficult to use.
    • The rationalization process gave insight into situations where functionality was duplicated across multiple applications and could be consolidated within one application.
    • The organization determined that its application portfolio was highly complex, and Info-Tech provided a good framework for more in-depth analysis.
    • The organization now has a rationalization process that it can take to other business domains.

    The challenge of corporate security management

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}41|cart{/j2store}
    • Related Products: {j2store}41|crosssells{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Security and Risk
    • Parent Category Link: /security-and-risk

    Corporate security management is a vital aspect in every modern business, regardless of business area or size. At Tymans Group we offer expert security management consulting to help your business set up proper protocols and security programs. More elaborate information about our security management consulting services and solutions can be found below.

    Corporate security management components

    You may be experiencing one or more of the following:

    • The risk goals should support business goals. Your business cannot operate without security, and security is there to conduct business safely. 
    • Security governance supports security strategy and security management. These three components form a protective arch around your business. 
    • Governance and management are like the legislative branch and the executive branch. Governance tells people what to do, and management's job is to verify that they do it.

    Our advice with regards to corporate security management

    Insight

    To have a successful information security strategy, take these three factors into account:

    • Holistic: your view must include people, processes, and technology.
    • Risk awareness: Base your strategy on the actual risk profile of your company and then add the appropriate best practices.
    • Business-aligned: When your strategic security plan demonstrates alignment with the business goals and supports it, embedding will be much more straightforward.

    Impact and results of our corporate security management approach

    • The approach of our security management consulting company helps to provide a starting point for realistic governance and realistic corporate security management.
    • We help you by implementing security governance and managing it, taking into account your company's priorities, and keeping costs to a minimum.

    The roadmap

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within the corporate security management domain have access to:

    Get up to speed

    Read up on why you should build your customized corporate information security governance and management system. Review our methodology and understand the four ways we can support you.

    Align your security objectives with your business goals

    Determine the company's risk tolerance.

    • Implement a Security Governance and Management Program – Phase 1: Align Business Goals With Security Objectives (ppt)
    • Information Security Governance and Management Business Case (ppt)
    • Information Security Steering Committee Charter (doc)
    • Information Security Steering Committee RACI Chart (doc)
    • Security Risk Register Tool (xls)

    Build a practical governance framework for your company

    Our best-of-breed security framework makes you perform a gap analysis between where you are and where you want to be (your target state). Once you know that, you can define your goals and duties.

    • Implement a Security Governance and Management Program – Phase 2: Develop an Effective Governance Framework (ppt)
    • Information Security Charter (doc)
    • Security Governance Organizational Structure Template (doc)
    • Security Policy Hierarchy Diagram (ppt)
    • Security Governance Model Facilitation Questions (ppt)
    • Information Security Policy Charter Template (doc)
    • Information Security Governance Model Tool (Visio)
    • Pdf icon 20x20
    • Information Security Governance Model Tool (PDF)

    Now that you have built it, manage your governance framework.

    There are several essential management activities that we as a security management consulting company suggest you employ.

    • Implement a Security Governance and Management Program – Phase 3: Manage Your Governance Framework (ppt)
    • Security Metrics Assessment Tool (xls)
    • Information Security Service Catalog (xls)
    • Policy Exception Tracker (xls)
    • Information Security Policy Exception Request Form (doc)
    • Security Policy Exception Approval Workflow (Visio)
    • Security Policy Exception Approval Workflow (PDF)
    • Business Goal Metrics Tracking Tool (xls)

    Book an online appointment for more advice

    We are happy to tell you more about our corporate security management solutions and help you set up fitting security objectives. As a security management consulting firm we offer solutions and advice, based on our own extensive experience, which are practical and people-orientated. Discover our services, which include data security management and incident management and book an online appointment with CEO Gert Taeymans to discuss any issues you may be facing regarding risk management or IT governance.

    cybersecurity

    Optimize the Mentoring Program to Build a High-Performing Learning Organization

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}596|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Employee Development
    • Parent Category Link: /train-and-develop
    • Many organizations have introduced mentoring programs without clearly defining and communicating the purpose and goals around having a program; they simply jumped on the mentoring bandwagon.
    • As a result, these programs have little impact. They don’t add value for mentors, mentees, or the organization.
    • It can be difficult to design a program that is well-suited to your organization, will be adopted by employees, and will drive the results you are looking for.
    • In particular, it is difficult to successfully match mentors and mentees so both derive maximum value from the endeavor.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • As workforce composition shifts, there is a need for mentoring programs to move beyond the traditional senior–junior format option; organizational culture and goals will dictate the best approach.
    • An organization’s mentoring program doesn’t need to be restricted to one format; individual preferences and goals should also factor in. Be open to choosing format on a case-by-case basis.
    • Be sure to gain upper management buy-in and support early to ensure mentoring becomes a valued part of your organization.
    • Ensure that goal setting, communication, ongoing support for participants, and evaluation all play a role in your mentoring program.

    Impact and Result

    • Mentoring can have a significant positive impact on mentor, mentee, and organization.
    • Mentees gain guidance and advice on their career path and skill development. Mentors often experience re-engagement with their job and the satisfaction of helping another person.
    • Mentoring participants benefit from obtaining different perspectives of both the business and work-related problems. Participation in a mentoring program has been linked to greater access to promotions, pay raises, and increased job satisfaction.
    • Mentoring can have a number of positive outcomes for the organization, including breaking down silos, transferring institutional knowledge, accelerating leadership skills, fostering open communication and dialogue, and resolving conflict.

    Optimize the Mentoring Program to Build a High-Performing Learning Organization Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Align the mentoring program with the organizational culture and goals

    Build a best-fit program that creates a learning culture.

    • Storyboard: Optimize the Mentoring Program to Build a High Performing Learning Organization

    2. Assess the organizational culture and current mentoring program

    Align mentoring practices with culture to improve the appropriateness and effectiveness of the program.

    • Mentoring Program Diagnostic

    3. Align mentoring practices with culture to improve the appropriateness and effectiveness of the program.

    Track project progress and have all program details defined in a central location.

    • Mentoring Project Plan Template
    • Peer Mentoring Guidelines
    • Mentoring Program Guidelines

    4. Gather feedback from the mentoring program participants

    Evaluate the success of the program.

    • Mentoring Project Feedback Surveys Template

    5. Get mentoring agreements in place

    Improve your mentoring capabilities.

    • Mentee Preparation Checklist
    • Mentoring Agreement Template
    [infographic]

    Adopt Change Management Practices and Succeed at IT Organizational Redesign

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}393|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Organizational Design
    • Parent Category Link: /organizational-design

    Organizational redesigns frequently fail when it comes to being executed. This leads to:

    • The loss of critical talent and institutional knowledge.
    • An inability to deliver on strategic goals and objectives.
    • Financial and time losses to the organization.

    Organizational redesigns fail during implementation primarily because they do not consider the change management required to succeed.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    Implementing your organizational design with good change management practices is more important than defining the new organizational structure.

    Implementation is often negatively impacted due to:

    • Employees not understanding the need to redesign the organizational structure or operating model.
    • Employees not being communicated with or engaged throughout the process, which can cause chaos.
    • Managers not being prepared or trained to have difficult conversations with employees.

    Impact and Result

    When good change management practices are used and embedded into the implementation process:

    • Employees feel respected and engaged, reducing turnover and productivity loss.
    • The desired operating structure can be implemented faster, enabling the delivery of strategic objectives.
    • Gaps and disorganization are avoided, saving the organization time and money.

    Invest change management for your IT redesign.

    Adopt Change Management Practices and Succeed at IT Organizational Redesign Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Adopt Change Management Practices and Succeed at IT Organizational Redesign Deck – Succeed at implementing your IT organizational structure by adopting the necessary change management practices.

    The best IT organizational structure will still fail to be implemented if the organization does not leverage and use good change management practices. Consider practices such as aligning the structure to a meaningful vision, preparing leadership, communicating frequently, including employees, and measuring adoption to succeed at organizational redesign implementation.

    • Adopt Change Management Practices and Succeed at IT Organizational Redesign Storyboard

    2. IT Organizational Redesign Pulse Survey Template – A survey template that can be used to measure the success of your change management practices during organizational redesign implementation.

    Taking regular pulse checks of employees and managers during the transition will enable IT Leaders to focus on the right practices to enable adoption.

    • IT Organizational Redesign Pulse Survey Template
    [infographic]

    Further reading

    Adopt Change Management Practices & Succeed at IT Organizational Redesign

    The perfect IT organizational structure will fail to be implemented if there is no change management.

    Analyst Perspective

    Don’t doom your organizational redesign efforts

    The image contains a picture of Brittany Lutes.

    After helping hundreds of organizations across public and private sector industries redesign their organizational structure, we can say there is one thing that will always doom this effort: A failure to properly identify and implement change management efforts into the process.

    Employees will not simply move forward with the changes you suggest just because you as the CIO are making them. You need to be prepared to describe the individual benefits each employee can expect to receive from the new structure. Moreover, it has to be clear why this change was needed in the first place. Redesign efforts should be driven by a clear need to align to the organization’s vision and support the various objectives that will need to take place.

    Most organizations do a great job defining a new organizational structure. They identify a way of operating that tells them how they need to align their IT capabilities to deliver on strategic objectives. What most organizations do poorly is invest in their people to ensure they can adopt this new way of operating.

    Brittany Lutes
    Research Director, Organizational Transformation

    Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    Common Obstacles

    Info-Tech’s Approach

    Organizational redesigns frequently fail when it comes to being executed. This leads to:

    • The loss of critical talent and institutional knowledge.
    • An inability to deliver on strategic goals and objectives.
    • Financial and time losses to the organization.

    Organizational redesigns fail during implementation primarily because they do not consider the change management required to succeed.

    Implementation of the organizational redesign is often impacted when:

    • Employees do not understand the need to redesign the organizational structure or operating model.
    • Employees are not communicated with or engaged throughout the process, which can cause chaos.
    • Managers are not prepared or trained to have difficult conversations with employees.

    Essentially, implementation is impacted when change management is not included in the redesign process.

    When good change management practices are used and embedded into the implementation process:

    • Employees feel respected and engaged, reducing turnover and productivity loss.
    • The desired operating structure can be implemented faster, enabling the delivery of strategic objectives.
    • Gaps and disorganization are avoided, saving the organization time and money.

    Invest in change management for your IT redesign.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Implementing your organizational design with good change management practices is more important than defining the new organizational structure.

    Your challenge

    This research enables organizations to succeed at their organizational redesign:

    • By implementing the right change management practices. These methods prevent:
      • The loss of critical IT employees who will voluntarily exit the organization.
      • Employees from creating rumors that will be detrimental to the change.
      • Confusion about why the change was needed and how it will benefit the strategic objectives the organization is seeking to achieve.
      • Spending resources (time, money, and people) on the initiative longer than is necessary.

    McKinsey reported less than 25% of organizational redesigns are successful. Which is worse than the average change initiative, which has a 70% failure rate.

    Source: AlignOrg, 2020.

    The value of the organizational redesign efforts is determined by the percentage of individuals who adopt the changes and operate in the desired way of working.

    When organizations properly use organizational design processes, they are:

    4× more likely to delight customers

    13× more effective at innovation

    27× more likely to retain employees

    Source: The Josh Bersin Company, 2022

    Common obstacles

    These barriers make implementing an organizational redesign difficult to address for many organizations:

    • You communicated the wrong message to the wrong audience at the wrong time. Repeatedly.
    • There is a lack of clarity around the drivers for an organizational redesign.
    • A readiness assessment was not completed ahead of the changes.
    • There is no flexibility built into the implementation approach.
    • The structure is not aligned to the strategic goals of IT and the organization.
    • IT leadership is not involved in their staff’s day-to-day activities, making it difficult to suggest realistic changes.

    Don’t doom your organizational redesign with poor change management

    Only 17% of frontline employees believe the lines of communication are open.

    Source: Taylor Reach Group, 2019

    43% Percentage of organizations that are ineffective at the organizational design methodology.

    Source: The Josh Bersin Company, 2022.

    Change management is a must for org design

    Forgetting change management is the easiest way to fail at redesigning your IT organizational structure

    • Change management is not a business transformation.
    • Change management consists of the practices and approaches your organization takes to support your people through a transformation.
    • Like governance, change management happens regardless of whether it is planned or ad hoc.
    • However, good change management will be intentional and agile, using data to help inform the next action steps you will take.
    • Change management is 100% focused on the people and how to best support them as they learn to understand the need for the change, what skills they must have to support and adopt the change, and eventually to advocate for the change.

    "Organizational transformation efforts rarely fail because of bad design, but rather from lack of sufficient attention to the transition from the old organization to the new one."

    – Michael D. Watkins & Janet Spencer. ”10 Reason Why Organizational Change Fails.”

    Info-Tech’s approach

    Redesigning the IT structure depends on good change management

    The image contains a screenshot of Info-Tech's approach, and good change management.

    Common changes in organizational redesigns

    Entirely New Teams

    Additions, reductions, or new creations. The individuals that make up a functional team can shift.

    New Team Members

    As roles become defined, some members might be required to shift and join already established groups.

    New Responsibilities

    The capabilities individuals will be accountable or responsible for become defined.

    New Ways of Operating

    From waterfall to Agile, collaborative to siloed, your operating model provides insight into the ways roles will engage one another.

    Top reasons organizational redesigns fail

    1. The rationale for the redesign is not clear.
    2. Managers do not have the skills to lead their teams through a change initiative like organizational redesign.
    3. You communicated the wrong messages at the wrong times to the wrong audiences.
    4. Frontline employees were not included in the process.
    5. The metrics you have to support the initiative are countering one another – if you have metrics at all.
    6. Change management and project management are being treated interchangeably.

    Case study: restructuring to reduce

    Clear Communication & Continuous Support

    Situation

    On July 26th, 2022, employees at Shopify – an eCommerce platform – were communicated to by their CEO that a round of layoffs was about to take place. Effective that day, 1,000 employees or 10% of the workforce would be laid off.

    In his message to staff, CEO Tobi Lutke admitted he had assumed continual growth in the eCommerce market when the COVID-19 pandemic forced many consumers into online shopping. Unfortunately, it was clear that was not the case.

    In his communications, Tobi let people know what to expect throughout the day, and he informed people what supports would be made available to those laid off. Mainly, employees could expect to see a transparent approach to severance pay; support in finding new jobs through coaching, connections, or resume creation; and ongoing payment for new laptops and internet to support those who depend on this connectivity to find new jobs.

    Results

    Unlike many of the other organizations (e.g. Wayfair and Peloton) that have had to conduct layoffs in 2022, Shopify had a very positive reaction. Many employees took to LinkedIn to thank their previous employer for all that they had learned with the organization and to ask their network to support them in finding new opportunities. Below is a letter from the CEO:

    The image contains a screenshot of a letter from the CEO.

    Shopify, 2022.
    Forbes, 2022.

    Aligned to a Meaningful Vision

    An organizational redesign must be aligned to a clear and meaningful vision of the organization.

    Define the drivers for organizational redesign

    And align the structure to execute on those drivers.

    • Your structure should follow your strategy. However, 83% of people in an organization do not fully understand the strategy (PWC, 2017).
    • How can employees be expected to understand why the IT organization needs to be restructured to meet a strategy if the strategy itself is still vague and unclear?
    • When organizations pursue a structural redesign, there are often a few major reasons:
      • Digital/organizational transformation
      • New organizational strategy
      • Acquisition or growth of products, services, or capabilities
      • The need to increase effectiveness
      • Cost savings
    • Creating a line of sight for your employees and leadership team will increase the likelihood that they want to adopt this structure.

    “The goal is to align your operating model with your strategy, so it directly supports your differentiating capabilities.”

    – PWC, 2017.

    How to align structure to strategy

    Recommended action steps:

    • Describe the end state of the organizational structure and how long you anticipate it will take to reach that state. It's important that employees be able to visualize the end state of the changes being made.
    • Ensure people understand the vision and goals of the IT organization. Are you having discussions about these? Are managers discussing these? Do people understand that their day-to-day job is intended to support those goals?
    • Create a visual:
      • The goals of the organization → align to the initiatives IT → which require this exact structure to deliver.
    • Do not assume people are willing to move forward with this vision. If people are not willing, assess why and determine if there are benefits specific to the individual that can support them in adopting the future state.
    • Define and communicate the risks of not making the organizational structure changes.

    Info-Tech Insight

    A trending organizational structure or operating model should never be the driver for an organizational redesign.

    IT Leaders Are Not Set Up To Succeed

    Empower these leaders to have difficult conversations.

    Lacking key leadership capabilities in managers

    Technical leaders are common in IT, but people leaders are necessary during the implementation of an organizational structure.

    • Managers are important during a transformational change for many reasons:
      • Managers play a critical role in being able to identify the skill gaps in employees and to help define the next steps in their career path.
      • After the sponsor (CIO) has communicated to the group the what and the why, the personal elements of the change fall to managers.
      • Managers’ displays of disapproval for the redesign can halt the transformation.
    • However, many managers (37%) feel uncomfortable talking to employees and providing feedback if they think it will elicit a negative response (Taylor Reach Group, 2019).
    • Unfortunately, organizational redesign is known for eliciting negative responses from employees as it generates fears around the unknown.
    • Therefore, managers must be able to have conversations with employees to further the successful implementation and adoption of the structure.

    “Successful organizational redesign is dependent on the active involvement of different managerial levels."

    – Marianne Livijn, “Managing Organizational Redesign: How Organizations Relate Macro and Micro Design.”

    They might be managers, but are they leaders?

    Recommended action steps:

    • Take time to speak with managers one on one and understand their thoughts, feelings, and understanding of the change.
    • Ensure that middle-managers have an opportunity to express the benefits they believe will be realized through the proposed changes to the organizational chart.
    • Provide IT leaders with leadership training courses (e.g. Info-Tech’s Leadership Programs).
    • Do not allow managers to start sharing and communicating the changes to the organizational structure if they are not demonstrating support for this change. Going forward, the group is all-in or not, but they should never demonstrate not being bought-in when speaking to employees.
    • Ensure IT leaders want to manage people, not just progress to a management position because they cannot climb a technical career ladder within the proposed structure. Provide both types of development opportunities to all employees.
    • Reduce the managers’ span of control to ensure they can properly engage all direct reports and there is no strain on the managers' time.

    Info-Tech Insight

    47% of direct reports do not agree that their leader is demonstrating the change behaviors. Often, a big reason is that many middle-managers do not understand their own attitudes and beliefs about the change.

    Source: McKinsey & Company “How Do We Manage the Change Journey?”

    Check out Info-Tech’s Build a Better Manager series to support leadership development

    These blueprints will help you create strong IT leaders who can manage their staff and themselves through a transformation.

    Build a Better Manager: Basic Management Skills

    Build a Better Manager: Personal Leadership

    Build a Better Manager: Manage Your People

    Build Successful Teams

    Transparent & Frequent Communication

    Provide employees with several opportunities to hear information and ask questions about the changes.

    Communication must be done with intention

    Include employees in the conversation to get the most out of your change management.

    • Whether it is a part of a large transformation or a redesign to support a specific goal of IT, begin thinking about how you will communicate the anticipated changes and who you will communicate those changes to right away.
    • The first group of people who need to understand why this initiative is important are the other IT leaders. If they are not included in the process and able to understand the foundational drivers of the initiative, you should not continue to try and gain the support of other members within IT.
    • Communication is critical to the success of the organizational redesign.
    • Communicating the right information at the right time will make the difference between losing critical talent and emerging from the transition successfully.
    • The sponsor of this redesign initiative must be able to communicate the rationale of the changes to the other members of leadership, management, and employees.
    • The sponsor and their change management team must then be prepared to accept the questions, comments, and ideas that members of IT might have around the changes.

    "Details about the new organization, along with details of the selection process, should be communicated as they are finalized to all levels of the organization.”

    – Courtney Jackson, “7 Reasons Why Organizational Structures Fail.”

    Two-way communication is necessary

    Recommended action steps:

    • Don't allow rumors to disrupt this initiative – be transparent with people as early as possible.
    • If the organizational restructure will not result in a reduction of staff – let them know! If someone's livelihood (job) is on the line, it increases the likelihood of panic. Let's avoid panic.
    • Provide employees with an opportunity to voice their concerns, questions, and recommendations – so long as you are willing to take that information and address it. Even if the answer to a recommendation is "no" or the answer to a question is "I don't know, but I will find out," you've still let them know their voice was heard in the process.
    • As the CIO, ensure that you are the first person to communicate the changes. You are the sponsor of this initiative – no one else.
    • Create communications that are clear and understandable. Imagine someone who does not work for your organization is hearing the information for the first time. Would they be able to comprehend the changes being suggested?
    • Conduct a pulse survey on the changes to identify whether employees understand the changes and feel heard by the management team.

    Info-Tech Insight

    The project manager of the organizational redesign should not be the communicator. The CIO and the employees’ direct supervisor should always be the communicators of key change messages.

    Communication spectrum

    An approach to communication based on the type of redesign taking place

    ← Business-Mandated Organizational Redesign

    Enable Alignment & Increased Effectiveness

    IT-Driven & Strategic Organizational Redesign →

    Reduction in roles

    Cost savings

    Requires champions who will maintain employee morale throughout

    Communicate with key individuals ahead of time

    Restructure of IT roles

    Increase effectiveness

    Lean on managers & supervisors to provide consistent messaging

    Communicate the individual benefits of the change

    Increase in IT Roles

    Alignment to business model

    Frequent and ongoing communication from the beginning

    Collaborate with IT groups for input on best structure

    Include Employees in the Redesign Process

    Stop talking at employees and ensure they are involved in the changes impacting their day-to-day lives.

    Employees will enable the change

    Old-school approaches to organizational redesign have argued employee engagement is a hinderance to success – it’s not.

    • We often fail to include the employees most impacted by a restructuring in the redesign process. As a result, one of the top reasons employees do not support the change is that they were not included in the change.
    • A big benefit of including employees in the process is it mitigates the emergence of a rumor mill.
    • Moreover, being open to suggestions from staff will help the transformation succeed.
    • Employees can best describe what this transition might entail on a day-to-day basis and the supports they will require to succeed in moving from their current state to their future state.
      • CIOs and other IT leaders are often too far removed from the day-to-day to best describe what will or will not work.
    • When employees feel included in the process, they are more likely to feel like they had a choice in what and how things change.

    "To enlist employees, leadership has to be willing to let things get somewhat messy, through intensive, authentic engagement and the involvement of employees in making the transformation work."

    – Michael D. Watkins & Janet Spencer, “10 Reasons Why Organizational Change Fails.”

    Empowering employees as change agents

    Recommended action steps:

    • Do not tell employees what benefits they will gain from this new change. Instead, ask them what benefits they anticipate.
    • Ask employees what challenges they anticipate, and identify actions that can be taken to minimize those challenges.
    • Identify who the social influencers are in the organization by completing an influencer map. The informal social networks in your organization can be powerful drivers of change when the right individuals are brought onboard.
    • Create a change network using those influencers. The change network includes individuals who represent all levels within the organization and can represent the employee perspective. Use them to help communicate the change and identify opportunities to increase the success of adoption: “Engaging influencers in change programs makes them 3.8 times more likely to succeed," (McKinsey & Company, 2020).
    • Ask members of the change network to identify possible resistors of the new IT structure and inform you of why they might be resisting the changes.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Despite the persistent misconceptions, including employees in the process of a redesign reduces uncertainty and rumors.

    Monitor employee engagement & adoption throughout the redesign

    Only 22% of organizations include the employee experience as a part of the design process

    – The Josh Bersin Company, 2022.
    1 2 3
    Monitor IT Employee Experience

    When Prosci designed their Change Impact Analysis, they identified the ways in which roles will be impacted across 10 different components:

    • Location
    • Process
    • Systems
    • Tools
    • Job roles
    • Critical behaviors
    • Mindset/attitudes/beliefs
    • Reporting structure
    • Performance reviews
    • Compensation

    Engaging employees in the process so that they can define how their role might be impacted across these 10 categories not only empowers the employee, but also ensures they are a part of the process.

    Source: Prosci, 2019.

    Conduct an employee pulse survey

    See the next slide for more information on how to create and distribute this survey.

    Employee Pulse Survey

    Conduct mindful and frequent check-ins with employees

    Process to conduct survey:

    1. Using your desired survey solution (e.g. MS Forms, SurveyMonkey, Qualtrics) input the questions into the survey and send to staff. A template of the survey in MS Forms is available here: IT Organizational Redesign Pulse Survey Template.
    2. When sending to staff, ensure that the survey is anonymous and reinforce this message.
    3. Leverage the responses from the survey to learn where there might be opportunities to improve the transformation experience (aligning the structure to the vision, employee inclusion, communication, or managerial support for the change). Review the recommended action steps in this research set for help.
    4. This assessment is intended for frequent but purposeful use. Only send out the survey when you have taken actions in order to improve adoption of the change or have provided communications. The Employee Pulse Survey should be reevaluated on a regular basis until adoption across all four categories reaches the desired state (80-100% adoption is recommended).

    The image contains a screenshot of the employee pulse survey.

    Define Key Metrics of Adoption & Success

    Metrics have a dual benefit of measuring successful implementation and meeting the original drivers.

    Measuring the implementation is a two-pronged approach

    Both employee adoption and the transformation of the IT structure need to be measured during implementation

    • Organizations that are going through any sort of transformation – such as organizational redesign – should be measuring whether they are successfully on track to meet their target or have already met that goal.
    • Throughout the organizational structure transition, a major factor that will impact the success of that goal is employee willingness to move forward with the changes.
    • However, rather than measuring these two components using hard data, we rely on gut checks that let us know if we think we are on track to gaining adoption and operating in the desired future state.
    • Given how fluid employees and their responses to change can be, conducting a pulse survey at a regular (but strategically identified) interval will provide insight into where the changes will be adopted or resisted.

    “Think about intentionally measuring at the moments in the change storyline where feedback will allow leaders to make strategic decisions and interventions.”

    – Bradley Wilson, “Employee Survey Questions: The Ultimate Guide.”

    Report that the organizational redesign for IT was a success

    Recommended action steps:

    • Create clear metrics related to how you will measure the success of the organizational redesign, and communicate those metrics to people. Ensure the metrics are not contrary to the goals of other initiatives or team outcomes.
    • Create one set of metrics related to adoption and another set of metrics tied to the successful completion of the project objective.
      • Are people changing their attitudes and behaviors to reflect the required outcome?
      • Are you meeting the desired outcome of the organizational redesign?
    • Use the metrics to inform how you move forward. Do not attempt the next phase of the organizational transformation before employees have clearly indicated a solid understanding of the changes.
    • Ensure that any metrics used to measure success will not negatively interfere with another team’s progress. The metrics of the group need to work together, not against each other.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Getting 100% adoption from employees is unlikely. However, if employee adoption is not sitting in the 80-90% range, it is not recommended that you move forward with the next phase of the transformation.

    Example sustainment metrics

    Driver Goal Measurement Key Performance Indicator (KPI)
    Workforce Challenges and Increased Effectiveness Employee Engagement The change in employee engagement before, during, and after the new organizational structure is communicated and implemented.
    Increased Effectiveness Alignment of Demand to Resources Does your organization have sufficient resources to meet the demands being placed on your IT organization?
    Increased Effectiveness and Workforce Challenges Role Clarity An increase in role clarity or a decrease in role ambiguity.

    Increased Effectiveness

    Reduction in Silos

    Employee effectiveness increases by 27% and efficiency by 53% when provided with role clarity (Effectory, 2019).
    Increased Effectiveness Reduction in Silos Frequency of communication channels created (scrum meetings, Teams channels, etc.) specific to the organizational structure intended to reduce silos.
    Operating in a New Org. Structure Change Adoption Rate The percentage of employees who have adopted their defined role within the new organizational chart in 3-, 6-, and 12-month increments.
    Workforce Challenges Turnover Rate The number of employees who voluntarily leave the organization, citing the organizational redesign.
    Workforce Challenges Active Resistors The number of active resistors anticipated related to the change in organizational structure versus the number of active resistors that actually present themselves to the organizational restructuring.
    New Capabilities Needed Gap in Capability Delivery The increase in effectiveness in delivering on new capabilities to the IT organization.
    Operating in a New Org. Structure Change Adoption Rate The percentage of employees who found the communication around the new organizational structure clear, easy to understand, and open to expressing feedback.
    Lack of Business Understanding or Increased Effectiveness Business Satisfaction with IT Increase in business satisfaction toward IT products and services.
    Workforce Challenges Employee Performance Increase in individual employee performances on annual/bi-annual reviews.
    Adoption Pulse Assessment Increase in overall adoption scores on pulse survey.
    Adoption Communication Effectiveness Reduction in the number of employees who are still unsure why the changes are required.
    Adoption Leadership Training Percentage of members of leadership attending training to support their development at the managerial level.

    Change Management ≠ Project Management

    Stop treating the two interchangeably.

    IT organizations struggle to mature their OCM capabilities

    Because frankly they didn’t need it

    • Change management is all about people.
    • If the success of your organization is dependent on this IT restructuring, it is important to invest the time to do it right.
    • This means it should not be something done off the side of someone's desk.
    • Hire a change manager or look to roles that have a responsibility to deliver on organizational change management.
    • While project success is often measured by if it was delivered on time, on budget, and in scope, change management is adaptable. It can move backward in the process to secure people's willingness to adopt the required behaviors.
    • Strategic organizations recognize it’s not just about pushing an initiative or project forward. It’s about making sure that your employees are willing to move that initiative forward too.
    • A major organizational transformation initiative like restructuring requires you lean into employee adoption and buy-in.

    “Only if you have your employees in mind can you implement change effectively and sustainably.”

    – Creaholic Pulse Feedback, “Change Management – And Why It Has to Change.”

    Take the time to educate & communicate

    Recommended action steps:

    • Do not treat change management and project management as synonymous.
    • Hire a change manager to support the organizational redesign transformation.
    • Invest the resources (time, money, people) that can support the change and enable its success. This can look like:
      • Training and development.
      • Hiring the right people.
      • Requesting funds during the redesign process to support the transition.
    • Create a change management plan – and be willing to adjust the timelines or actions of this plan based on the feedback you receive from employees.
    • Implement the new organizational structure in a phased approach. This allows time to receive feedback and address any fears expressed by staff.

    Info-Tech Insight

    OCM is often not included or used due to a lack of understanding of how it differs from project management.

    And an additional five experts across a variety of organizations who wish to remain anonymous.

    Research Contributors and Experts

    Info-Tech Research Group

    Amanda Mathieson Research Director Heather Munoz Executive Counselor Valence Howden Principal Research Director
    Ugbad Farah Research Director Lisa Hager Duncan Executive Counselor Alaisdar Graham Executive Counselor
    Carlene McCubbin Practice Lead

    Related Info-Tech Research

    Redesign Your IT Organizational Structure

    Build a Strategic IT Workforce Plan

    Implement a New IT Organizational Structure

    • Organizational redesign is only as successful as the process leaders engage in.
    • Benchmarking your organizational redesign to other organizations will not work.
    • You could have the best IT employees in the world, but if they aren’t structured well, your organization will still fail in reaching its vision.
    • A well-defined strategic workforce plan (SWP) isn’t just a nice-to-have, it’s a must-have.
    • Integrate as much data as possible into your workforce plan to best prepare you for the future. Without knowledge of your future initiatives, you are filling hypothetical holes.
    • To be successful, you need to understand your strategic initiatives, workforce landscape, and external and internal trends.
    • Organizational design implementations can be highly disruptive for IT staff and business partners. Without a structured approach, IT leaders may experience high turnover, decreased productivity, and resistance to change.
    • CIOs walk a tightrope as they manage operational and emotional turbulence while aiming to improve business satisfaction with IT. Failure to achieve balance could result in irreparable failure.

    Bibliography

    Aronowitz, Steven, et al. “Getting Organizational Design Right,” McKinsey, 2015. Web.
    Ayers, Peg. “5 Ways to Engage Your Front-Line Staff.” Taylor Reach Group, 2019. Web.
    Bushard, Brian, and Carlie Porterfield. “Meta Reportedly Scales Down, Again – Here Are the Major US Layoffs This Year.” Forbes, September 28, 2022. Web.
    Caruci, Ron. “4 Organizational Design Issues that Most Leaders Misdiagnose.” Harvard Business Review, 2019.
    “Change Management – And Why It Has to Change.” Creaholic Pulse Feedback. Web.
    “Communication Checklist for Achieving Change Management.” Prosci, 27 Oct. 2022. Web.
    “Defining Change Impact.” Prosci. 29 May 2019. Web.
    “The Definitive Guide To Organization Design.” The Josh Bersin Company, 2022.
    Deshler, Reed. “Five Reasons Organizational Redesigns Fail to Deliver.” AlignOrg. 28 Jan. 2020. Web.
    The Fit for Growth Mini Book. PwC, 12 Jan. 2017.
    Helfand, Heidi. Dynamic Reteaming: The Art and Wisdom of Changing Teams. 2nd ed., O’Reilly Media, 2020.
    Jackson, Courtney. “7 Reasons Why Organizational Structures Fail.” Scott Madden Consultants. Web.
    Livijn, Marianne. Managing Organizational Redesign: How Organizations Relate Macro and Micro Design. Doctoral dissertation. Department of Management, Aarhus University, 2020.
    Lutke, Tobias. “Changes to Shopify’s Team.” Shopify. 26 July 2022.
    McKinsey & Company. “How Do We Manage the Change Journey?” McKinsey & Company.2020.
    Pijnacker, Lieke. “HR Analytics: Role Clarity Impacts Performance.” Effectory, 29 Sept. 2019. Web.
    Tompkins, Teri C., and Bruce G. Barkis. “Conspiracies in the Workplace: Symptoms and Remedies.” Graziadio Business Review, vol. 21, no. 1, 2021.Web.
    “Understanding Organizational Structures.” SHRM,2022.
    Watkins, Michael D., and Janet Spencer. “10 Reasons Why Organizational Change Fails.” I by IMD, 10 March 2021. Web.
    Wilson, Bradley. “Employee Survey Questions: The Ultimate Guide.” Perceptyx, 1 July 2020. Web.

    Ensure Cloud Security in IaaS, PaaS, and SaaS Environments

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}386|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Secure Cloud & Network Architecture
    • Parent Category Link: /secure-cloud-network-architecture
    • Security remains a large impediment to realizing cloud benefits. Numerous concerns still exist around the ability for data privacy, confidentiality, and integrity to be maintained in a cloud environment.
    • Even if adoption is agreed upon, it becomes hard to evaluate vendors that have strong security offerings and even harder to utilize security controls that are internally deployed in the cloud environment.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • The cloud can be secure despite unique security threats.
    • Securing a cloud environment is a balancing act of who is responsible for meeting specific security requirements.
    • Most security challenges and concerns can be minimized through our structured process (CAGI) of selecting a trusted cloud security provider (CSP) partner.

    Impact and Result

    • The business is adopting a cloud environment and it must be secured, which includes:
      • Ensuring business data cannot be leaked or stolen.
      • Maintaining privacy of data and other information.
      • Securing the network connection points.
    • Determine your balancing act between yourself and your CSP; through contractual and configuration requirements, determine what security requirements your CSP can meet and cover the rest through internal deployment.
    • This blueprint and associated tools are scalable for all types of organizations within various industry sectors.

    Ensure Cloud Security in IaaS, PaaS, and SaaS Environments Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should prioritize security in the cloud, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Determine your cloud risk profile

    Determine your organization’s rationale for cloud adoption and what that means for your security obligations.

    • Ensure Cloud Security in IaaS, PaaS, and SaaS Environments – Phase 1: Determine Your Cloud Risk Profile
    • Secure Cloud Usage Policy

    2. Identify your cloud security requirements

    Use the Cloud Security CAGI Tool to perform four unique assessments that will be used to identify secure cloud vendors.

    • Ensure Cloud Security in IaaS, PaaS, and SaaS Environments – Phase 2: Identify Your Cloud Security Requirements
    • Cloud Security CAGI Tool

    3. Evaluate vendors from a security perspective

    Learn how to assess and communicate with cloud vendors with security in mind.

    • Ensure Cloud Security in IaaS, PaaS, and SaaS Environments – Phase 3: Evaluate Vendors From a Security Perspective
    • IaaS and PaaS Service Level Agreement Template
    • SaaS Service Level Agreement Template
    • Cloud Security Communication Deck

    4. Implement your secure cloud program

    Turn your security requirements into specific tasks and develop your implementation roadmap.

    • Ensure Cloud Security in IaaS, PaaS, and SaaS Environments – Phase 4: Implement Your Secure Cloud Program
    • Cloud Security Roadmap Tool

    5. Build a cloud security governance program

    Build the organizational structure of your cloud security governance program.

    • Ensure Cloud Security in IaaS, PaaS, and SaaS Environments – Phase 5: Build a Cloud Security Governance Program
    • Cloud Security Governance Program Template
    [infographic]

    Sprint Toward Data-Driven Culture Using DataOps

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}199|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $10,399 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 9 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Enterprise Integration
    • Parent Category Link: /enterprise-integration
    • Data teams do not have a mechanism to integrate with operations teams and operate in a silo.
    • Significant delays in the operationalization of analytical/algorithms due to lack of standards and a clear path to production.
    • Raw data is shared with end users and data scientists due to poor management of data, resulting in more time spent on integration and less on insight generation and analytics.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Data and analytics teams need a clear mechanism to separate data exploratory work and repetitive data insights generation. Lack of such separation is the main cause of significant delays, inefficiencies, and frustration for data initiatives.
    • Access to data and exploratory data analytics is critical. However, the organization must learn to share insights and reuse analytics.
    • Once analytics finds wider use in the organization, they need to adopt a disciplined approach to ensure its quality and continuous integration in the production environment.

    Impact and Result

    • Use a metrics-driven approach and common framework across silos to enable the rapid development of data initiatives using Agile principles.
    • Implement an approach that allows business, data, and operation teams to collaboratively work together to provide a better customer experience.
    • Align DataOps to an overall data management and governance program that promotes collaboration, transparency, and empathy across teams, establishes the appropriate roles and responsibilities, and ensures alignment to a common set of goals.
    • Assess the current maturity of the data operations teams and implement a roadmap that considers the necessary competencies and capabilities and their dependencies in moving towards the desired DataOps target state.

    Sprint Toward Data-Driven Culture Using DataOps Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to understand the operational challenges associated with productizing the organization's data-related initiative. Review Info-Tech’s methodology for enabling the improved practice to operationalize data analytics and how we will support you in creating an agile data environment.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Discover benefits of DataOps

    Understand the benefits of DataOps and why organizations are looking to establish agile principles in their data practice, the challenges associated with doing so, and what the new DataOps strategy needs to be successful.

    • Sprint Toward Data-Driven Culture Using DataOps – Phase 1: Discover Benefits of DataOps

    2. Assess your data practice for DataOps

    Analyze DataOps using Info-Tech’s DataOps use case framework, to help you identify the gaps in your data practices that need to be matured to truly realize DataOps benefits including data integration, data security, data quality, data engineering, and data science.

    • Sprint Toward Data-Driven Culture Using DataOps – Phase 2: Assess Your Data Practice for DataOps
    • DataOps Roadmap Tool

    3. Mature your DataOps practice

    Mature your data practice by putting in the right people in the right roles and establishing DataOps metrics, communication plan, DataOps best practices, and data principles.

    • Sprint Toward Data-Driven Culture Using DataOps – Phase 3: Mature Your DataOps Practice
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Sprint Toward Data-Driven Culture Using DataOps

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Identify the Drivers of the Business for DataOps

    The Purpose

    Understand the DataOps approach and value proposition.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A clear understanding of organization data priorities and metrics along with a simplified view of data using Info-Tech’s Onion framework.

    Activities

    1.1 Explain DataOps approach and value proposition.

    1.2 Review the common business drivers and how the organization is driving a need for DataOps.

    1.3 Understand Info-Tech’s DataOps Framework.

    Outputs

    Organization's data priorities and metrics

    Data Onion framework

    2 Assess DataOps Maturity in Your Organization

    The Purpose

    Assess the DataOps maturity of the organization.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Define clear understanding of organization’s DataOps capabilities.

    Activities

    2.1 Assess current state.

    2.2 Develop target state summary.

    2.3 Define DataOps improvement initiatives.

    Outputs

    Current state summary

    Target state summary

    3 Develop Action Items and Roadmap to Establish DataOps

    The Purpose

    Establish clear action items and roadmap.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Define clear and measurable roadmap to mature DataOps within the organization.

    Activities

    3.1 Continue DataOps improvement initiatives.

    3.2 Document the improvement initiatives.

    3.3 Develop a roadmap for DataOps practice.

    Outputs

    DataOps initiatives roadmap

    4 Plan for Continuous Improvement

    The Purpose

    Define a plan for continuous improvements.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Continue to improve DataOps practice.

    Activities

    4.1 Create target cross-functional team structures.

    4.2 Define DataOps metrics for continuous monitoring.

    4.3 Create a communication plan.

    Outputs

    DataOps cross-functional team structure

    DataOps metrics

    10 Secrets for Successful Disaster Recovery in the Cloud

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}419|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 10.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $12,096 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 20 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: DR and Business Continuity
    • Parent Category Link: /business-continuity
    • The pay-per-use pricing structure of cloud services make it a cheaper DR option, but there are gotchas you need to avoid, ranging from unexpected licensing costs to potential security vulnerabilities.
    • You likely started on the path to cloud DR with consideration of cloud storage for offsite retention of backups. Systems recovery in the cloud can be a real value-add to using cloud as a backup target.
    • Your cloud-based DR environment has to be secure and compliant, but performance also has to be “good enough” to operate the business.
    • Location still matters, and selecting the DR site that optimizes latency tolerance and geo-redundancy can be difficult.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Keep your systems dormant until disaster strikes. Prepare as much of your environment as possible without tapping into compute resources. Enjoy the low at-rest costs, and leverage the reliability of the cloud in your failover.
    • Avoid failure on the failback! Bringing up your systems in the cloud is a great temporary solution, but an expensive long-term strategy. Make sure you have a plan to get back on premises.
    • Leverage cloud DR as a start for cloud migration. Cloud DR provides a gateway for broader infrastructure lift and shift to cloud IaaS, but this should only be the first phase of a longer-term roadmap that ends in multi-service hybrid cloud.

    Impact and Result

    • Calculate the cost of your DR solution with a cloud vendor. Test your systems often to build out more accurate budgets and to define failover and failback action plans to increase confidence in your capabilities.
    • Define “good enough” performance by consulting with the business and setting correct expectations for the recovery state.
    • Dig deeper into the various flavors of cloud-based DR beyond backup and restore, including pilot light, warm standby, and multi-site recovery. Each of these has unique benefits and challenges when done in the cloud.

    10 Secrets for Successful Disaster Recovery in the Cloud Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out the 10 secrets for success in cloud-based DR deployment, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    [infographic]

    Accelerate Your Automation Processes

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}485|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Service Desk
    • Parent Category Link: /service-desk

    Your organization needs to:

    • Define an automation suite for the business.
    • Specify the business goals for your automation suite.
    • Roadmap your automation modules to continually grow your automation platform.
    • Identify how an automation suite can help the organization improve.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    Start small and do it right:

    • Assess if a particular solution works for your organization and continually invest in it if it does before moving onto the next solution.
    • Overwhelming your organization with a plethora of automation solutions can lead to a lack of management for each solution and decrease your overall return on investment.

    Impact and Result

    • Define your automation suite in terms of your business goals.
    • Take stock of what you have now: RPA, AIOps, chatbots.
    • Think about how to integrate and optimize what you have now, as well as roadmap your continual improvement.

    Accelerate Your Automation Processes Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read this Executive Brief to find out why your organization should accelerate your automation processes, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the ways Info-Tech can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Discover automation suite possibilities

    Take hold of your current state and assess where you would like to improve. See if adding a new automation module or investing in your current modules is the right decision.

    • Automation Suite Maturity Assessment Tool

    2. Chart your automation suite roadmap

    Build a high-level roadmap of where you want to bring your organization's automation suite in the future.

    • Automation Suite Roadmap Tool
    [infographic]

    Drive Technology Adoption

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}111|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Strategy and Organizational Design
    • Parent Category Link: /strategy-and-organizational-design

    The project isn’t over if the new product or system isn’t being used. How do you ensure that what you’ve put in place isn’t going to be ignored or only partially adopted? People are more complicated than any new system and managing them through the change needs careful planning.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    Cultivating a herd mentality, where people adopt new technology merely because everyone else is, is an important goal in getting the bulk of users using the new product or system. The herd needs to gather momentum though and this can be done by using the more tech-able and enthused to lead the rest on the journey. Identifying and engaging these key resources early in the process will greatly assist in starting the flow.

    Impact and Result

    While communication is key throughout, involving staff in proof-of-concept activities and contests and using the train-the-trainer techniques and technology champions will all start the momentum toward technology adoption. Group activities will address the bulk of users, but laggards may need special attention.

    Drive Technology Adoption Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Drive Technology Adoption – A brief deck describing how to encourage users to adopt newly implemented technology.

    This document will help you to ensure that newly implemented systems and technologies are correctly adopted by the intended recipients.

    • Drive Technology Adoption Storyboard
    [infographic]

    Further reading

    Drive Technology Adoption

    The project is over. The new technology is implemented. Now how do we make sure it's used?

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    Technology endlessly changes and evolves. Similarly, business directions and requirements change, and these changes need to be supported by technology. Improved functionality and evolvement of systems, along with systems becoming redundant or unsupported, means that maintaining a static environment is virtually impossible.

    Enormous amounts of IT budget are allocated to these changes each year. But once the project is over, how do you manage that change and ensure the systems are being used? Planning your technology adoption is vital.

    Common Obstacles

    The obstacles to technology adoption can be many and various, covering a broad spectrum of areas including:

    • Reluctance of staff to let go of familiar processes and procedures.
    • Perception that any change will add complications but not add value, thereby hampering enthusiasm to adopt.
    • Lack of awareness of the change.
    • General fear of change.
    • Lack of personal confidence.

    Info-Tech’s Approach

    Start by identifying, understanding, categorizing, and defining barriers and put in place a system to:

    • Gain an early understanding of the different types of users and their attitudes to technology and change.
    • Review different adoption techniques and analyze which are most appropriate for your user types.
    • Use a “Follow the Leader” approach, by having technical enthusiasts and champions to show the way.
    • Prevent access to old systems and methods.

    Info-Tech Insight

    For every IT initiative that will be directly used by users, consider the question, “Will the final product be readily accepted by those who are going to use it?” There is no point in implementing a product that no one is prepared to use. Gaining user acceptance is much more than just ticking a box in a project plan once UAT is complete.

    The way change should happen is clear

    Prosci specializes in change. Its ADKAR model outlines what’s required to bring individuals along on the change journey.

    AWARENESS

    • Awareness means more than just knowing there’s a change occurring,
    • it means understanding the need for change.

    DESIRE

    • To achieve desire, there needs to be motivation, whether it be from an
    • organizational perspective or personal.

    KNOWLEDGE

    • Both knowledge on how to train during the transition and knowledge
    • on being effective after the change are required. This can only be done
    • once awareness and desire are achieved.

    ABILITY

    • Ability is not knowledge. Knowing how to do something doesn’t necessarily translate to having the skills to do it.

    REINFORCEMENT

    • Without reinforcement there can be a tendency to revert.

    When things go wrong

    New technology is not being used

    The project is seen as complete. Significant investments have been made, but the technology either isn’t being used or is only partially in use.

    Duplicate systems are now in place

    Even worse. The failure to adopt the new technology by some means that the older systems are still being used. There are now two systems that fail to interact; business processes are being affected and there is widespread confusion.

    Benefits not being realized

    Benefits promised to the business are not being realized. Projected revenue increases, savings, or efficiencies that were forecast are now starting to be seen as under threat.

    There is project blowout

    The project should be over, but the fact that the technology is not being used has created a perception that the implementation is not complete and the project needs to continue.

    Info-Tech Insight

    People are far more complicated than any technology being implemented.

    Consider carefully your approach.

    Why does it happen?

    POOR COMMUNICATION

    There isn’t always adequate communications about what’s changing in the workplace.

    FEAR

    Fear of change is natural and often not rational. Whether the fear is about job loss or not being able to adapt to change; it needs to be managed.

    TRAINING

    Training can be insufficient or ineffective and when this happens people are left feeling like they don’t have the skills to make the change.

    LACK OF EXECUTIVE SUPPORT

    A lack of executive support for change means the change is seen as less important.

    CONFLICTING VIEWS OF CHANGE

    The excitement the project team and business feels about the change is not necessarily shared throughout the business. Some may just see the change as more work, changing something that already works, or a reason to reduce staff levels.

    LACK OF CONFIDENCE

    Whether it’s a lack of confidence generally with technology or concern about a new or changing tool, a lack of confidence is a huge barrier.

    BUDGETARY CONSTRAINTS

    There is a cost with managing people during a change, and budget must be allocated to allow for it.

    Communications

    Info-Tech Insight

    Since Sigmund Freud there has been endless work to understand people’s minds.
    Don’t underestimate the effect that people’s reactions to change can have on your project.

    This is a Kubler-ross change curve graph, plotting the following Strategies: Create Alignment; Maximize Communication; Spark Motivation; Develop Capability; Share Knowledge

    Communication plans are designed to properly manage change. Managing change can be easier when we have the right tools and information to adapt to new circumstances. The Kubler-Ross change curve illustrates the expected steps on the path to acceptance of change. With the proper communications strategy, each can be managed appropriately

    Analyst perspective

    Paul Binns – Principal Research Advisor, Info-Tech

    The rapidly changing technology landscape in our world has always meant that an enthusiasm or willingness to embrace change has been advantageous. Many of us have seen how the older generation has struggled with that change and been left behind.

    In the work environment, the events of the past two years have increased pressure on those slow to adopt as in many cases they couldn't perform their tasks without new tools. Previously, for example, those who may have been reluctant to use digital tools and would instead opt for face-to-face meetings, suddenly found themselves without an option as physical meetings were no longer possible. Similarly, digital collaboration tools that had been present in the market for some time were suddenly more heavily used so everyone could continue to work together in the “online world.”

    At this stage no one is sure what the "new normal" will be in the post-pandemic world, but what has been clearly revealed is that people are prepared to change given the right motivation.

    “Technology adoption is about the psychology of change.”
    Bryan Tutor – Executive Counsellor, Info-Tech

    The Fix

    • Categorize Users
      • Gain a clear understanding of your user types.
    • Identify Adoption Techniques
      • Understand the range of different tools and techniques available.
    • Match Techniques To Categories
      • Determine the most appropriate techniques for your user base.
    • Follow-the-Leader
      • Be aware of the different skills in your environment and use them to your advantage.
    • Refresh, Retrain, Restrain
      • Prevent reversion to old methods or systems.

    Categories

    Client-Driven Insight

    Consider your staff and industry when looking at the Everett Rogers curve. A technology organization may have less laggards than a traditional manufacturing one.

    In Everett Rogers’ book Diffusion of Innovations 5th Edition (Free Press, 2005), Rogers places adopters of innovations into five different categories.

    This is an image of an Innovation Adoption Curve from Everett Rogers' book Diffusion of Innovations 5th Edition

    Category 1: The Innovator – 2.5%

    Innovators are technology enthusiasts. Technology is a central interest of theirs, either at work, at home, or both. They tend to aggressively pursue new products and technologies and are likely to want to be involved in any new technology being implemented as soon as possible, even before the product is ready to be released.

    For people like this the completeness of the new technology or the performance can often be secondary because of their drive to get new technology as soon as possible. They are trailblazers and are not only happy to step out of their comfort zone but also actively seek to do so.

    Although they only make up about 2.5% of the total, their enthusiasm, and hopefully endorsement of new technology, offers reassurance to others.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Innovators can be very useful for testing before implementation but are generally more interested in the technology itself rather than the value the technology will add to the business.

    Category 2: The Early Adopter – 13.5%

    Whereas Innovators tend to be technologists, Early Adopters are visionaries that like to be on board with new technologies very early in the lifecycle. Because they are visionaries, they tend to be looking for more than just improvement – a revolutionary breakthrough. They are prepared to take high risks to try something new and although they are very demanding as far as product features and performance are concerned, they are less price-sensitive than other groups.

    Early Adopters are often motivated by personal success. They are willing to serve as references to other adopter groups. They are influential, seen as trendsetters, and are of utmost importance to win over.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Early adopters are key. Their enthusiasm for technology, personal drive, and influence make them a powerful tool in driving adoption.

    Category 3: The Early Majority – 34%

    This group is comprised of pragmatists. The first two adopter groups belong to early adoption, but for a product to be fully adopted the mainstream needs to be won over, starting with the Early Majority.

    The Early Majority share some of the Early Adopters’ ability to relate to technology. However, they are driven by a strong sense of practicality. They know that new products aren’t always successful. Consequently, they are content to wait and see how others fare with the technology before investing in it themselves. They want to see well-established references before adopting the technology and to be shown there is no risk.

    Because there are so many people in this segment (roughly 34%), winning these people over is essential for the technology to be adopted.

    Category 4: The Late Majority – 34%

    The Late Majority are the conservatives. This group is generally about the same size as the Early Majority. They share all the concerns of the Early Majority; however, they are more resistant to change and are more content with the status quo than eager to progress to new technology. People in the Early Majority group are comfortable with their ability to handle new technology. People in the Late Majority are not.

    As a result, these conservatives prefer to wait until something has become an established standard and take part only at the end of the adoption period. Even then, they want to see lots of support and ensure that there is proof there is no risk in them adopting it.

    Category 5: The Laggard – 16%

    This group is made up of the skeptics and constitutes 16% of the total. These people want nothing to do with new technology and are generally only content with technological change when it is invisible to them. These skeptics have a strong belief that disruptive new technologies rarely deliver the value promised and are almost always worried about unintended consequences.

    Laggards need to be dealt with carefully as their criticism can be damaging and without them it is difficult for a product to become fully adopted. Unfortunately, the effort required for this to happen is often disproportional to the size of the group.

    Info-Tech Insight

    People aren’t born laggards. Technology projects that have failed in the past can alter people’s attitudes, especially if there was a negative impact on their working lives. Use empathy when dealing with people and respect their hesitancy.

    Adoption Techniques

    Different strokes for different folks

    Technology adoption is all about people; and therefore, the techniques required to drive that adoption need to be people oriented.

    The following techniques are carefully selected with the intention of being impactful on all the different categories described previously.

    Technology Adoption: Herd Mentality; Champions; Force; Group Training; One-on-One; Contests; Marketing; Proof of Concept; Train the Trainer

    There are multitudes of different methods to get people to adopt new technology, but which is the most appropriate for your situation? Generally, it’s a combination.

    Technology Adoption: Herd Mentality; Champions; Force; Group Training; One-on-One; Contests; Marketing; Proof of Concept; Train the Trainer

    Train the Trainer

    Use your staff to get your message across.

    Abstract

    This technique involves training key members of staff so they can train others. It is important that those selected are strong communicators, are well respected by others, and have some expertise in technology.

    Advantages

    • Cost effective
    • Efficient dissemination of information
    • Trusted internal staff

    Disadvantages

    • Chance of inconsistent delivery
    • May feel threatened by co-worker

    Best to worst candidates

    • Early Adopter: Influential trendsetters. Others receptive of their lead.
    • Innovator: Comfortable and enthusiastic about new technology, but not necessarily a trainer.
    • Early Majority: Tendency to take others’ lead.
    • Late Majority: Risk averse and tend to follow others, only after success is proven.
    • Laggard: Last to adopt usually. Unsuitable as Trainer.

    Marketing

    Marketing should be continuous throughout the change to encourage familiarity.

    Abstract

    Communication is key as people are comfortable with what is familiar to them. Marketing is an important tool for convincing adopters that the new product is mainstream, widely adopted and successful.

    Advantages

    • Wide communication
    • Makes technology appear commonplace
    • Promotes effectiveness of new technology

    Disadvantages

    • Reliant on staff interest
    • Can be expensive

    Best to worst candidates

    • Early Majority: Pragmatic about change. Marketing is effective encouragement.
    • Early Adopter: Receptive and interested in change. Marketing is supplemental.
    • Innovator: Actively seeks new technology. Does not need extensive encouragement.
    • Late Majority: Requires more personal approach.
    • Laggard: Resistant to most enticements.

    One-on-One

    Tailored for individuals.

    Abstract

    One-on-one training sometimes is the only way to train if you have staff with special needs or who are performing unique tasks.
    It is generally highly effective but inefficient as it only addresses individuals.

    Advantages

    • Tailored to specific need(s)
    • Only relevant information addressed
    • Low stress environment

    Disadvantages

    • Expensive
    • Possibility of inconsistent delivery
    • Personal conflict may render it ineffective

    Best to worst candidates

    • Laggard: Encouragement and cajoling can be used during training.
    • Late Majority: Proof can be given of effectiveness of new product.
    • Early Majority: Effective, but not cost efficient.
    • Early Adopter: Effective, but not cost-efficient.
    • Innovator: Effective, but not cost-efficient.

    Group Training

    Similar roles, attitudes, and abilities.

    Abstract

    Group training is one of the most common methods to start people on their journey toward new technology. Its effectiveness with the two largest groups, Early Majority and Late Majority, make it a primary tool in technology adoption.

    Advantages

    • Cost effective
    • Time effective
    • Good for team building

    Disadvantages

    • Single method may not work for all
    • Difficult to create single learning pace for all

    Best to worst candidates

    • Early Majority: Receptive. The formality of group training will give confidence.
    • Late Majority: Conservative attitude will be receptive to traditional training.
    • Early Adopter: Receptive and attentive. Excited about the change.
    • Innovator: Will tend to want to be ahead or want to move ahead of group.
    • Laggard: Laggards in group training may have a negative impact.

    Force

    The last resort.

    Abstract

    The transition can’t go on forever.

    At some point the new technology needs to be fully adopted and if necessary, force may have to be used.

    Advantages

    • Immediate full transition
    • Fixed delivery timeline

    Disadvantages

    • Alienation of some staff
    • Loss of faith in product if there are issues

    Best to worst candidates

    • Laggard: No choice but to adopt. Forces the issue.
    • Late Majority: Removes issue of reluctance to change.
    • Early Majority: Content, but worried about possible problems.
    • Early Adopter: Feel less personal involvement in change process.
    • Innovator: Feel less personal involvement in change process.

    Contests

    Abstract

    Contests can generate excitement and create an explorative approach to new technology. People should not feel pressured. It should be enjoyable and not compulsory.

    Advantages

    • Rapid improvement of skills
    • Bring excitement to the new technology
    • Good for team building

    Disadvantages

    • Those less competitive or with lower skills may feel alienated
    • May discourage collaboration

    Best to worst candidates

    • Early Adopter: Seeks personal success. Risk taker. Effective.
    • Innovator: Enthusiastic to explore limits of technology.
    • Early Majority: Less enthusiastic. Pragmatic. Less competitive.
    • Late Majority: Conservative. Not enthusiastic about new technology.
    • Laggard: Reluctant to get involved.

    Incentives

    Incentives don’t have to be large.

    Abstract

    For some staff, merely taking management’s lead is not enough. Using “Nudge” techniques to give that extra incentive is quite effective. Incentivizing staff either financially or through rewards, recognition, or promotion is a successful adoption technique for some.

    Advantages

    Encouragement to adopt from receiving tangible benefit

    Draws more attention to the new technology

    Disadvantages

    Additional expense to business or project

    Possible poor precedent for subsequent changes

    Best to worst candidates

    Early Adopter: Desire for personal success makes incentives enticing.

    Early Majority: Prepared to change, but extra incentive will assist.

    Late Majority: Conservative attitude means incentive may need to be larger.

    Innovator: Enthusiasm for new technology means incentive not necessary.

    Laggard: Sceptical about change. Only a large incentive likely to make a difference.

    Champions

    Strong internal advocates for your new technology are very powerful.

    Abstract

    Champions take on new technology and then use their influence to promote it in the organization. Using managers as champions to actively and vigorously promote the change is particularly effective.

    Advantages

    • Infectious enthusiasm encourages those who tend to be reluctant
    • Use of trusted internal staff

    Disadvantages

    • Removes internal staff from regular duties
    • Ineffective if champion not respected

    Best to worst candidates

    • Early Majority: Champions as references of success provide encouragement.
    • Late Majority: Management champions in particular are effective.
    • Laggard: Close contact with champions may be effective.
    • Early Adopter: Receptive of technology, less effective.
    • Innovator: No encouragement or promotion required.

    Herd Mentality

    Follow the crowd.

    Abstract

    Herd behavior is when people discount their own information and follow others. Ideally all adopters would understand the reason and advantages in adopting new technology, but practically, the result is most important.

    Advantages

    • New technology is adopted without question
    • Increase in velocity of adoption

    Disadvantages

    • Staff may not have clear understanding of the reason for change and resent it later
    • Some may adopt the change before they are ready to do so

    Best to worst candidates

    • Early Majority: Follow others’ success.
    • Late Majority: Likely follow an established proven standard.
    • Early Adopter: Less effective as they prefer to set trends rather than follow.
    • Innovator: Seeks new technology rather than following others.
    • Laggard: Suspicious and reluctant to change.

    Proof of Concepts

    Gain early input and encourage buy-in.

    Abstract

    Proof of concept projects give early indications of the viability of a new initiative. Involving the end users in these projects can be beneficial in gaining their support

    Advantages

    Involve adopters early on

    Valuable feedback and indications of future issues

    Disadvantages

    If POC isn’t fully successful, it may leave lingering negativity

    Usually, involvement from small selection of staff

    Best to worst candidates

    • Innovator: Strong interest in getting involved in new products.
    • Early Adopter: Comfortable with new technology and are influencers.
    • Early Majority: Less interest. Prefer others to try first.
    • Late Majority: Conservative attitude makes this an unlikely option.
    • Laggard: Highly unlikely to get involved.

    Match techniques to categories

    What works for who?

    This clustered column chart categorizes techniques by category

    Follow the leader

    Engage your technology enthusiasts early to help refine your product, train other staff, and act as champions. A combination of marketing and group training will develop a herd mentality. Finally, don’t neglect the laggards as they can prevent project completion.

    This is an inverted funnel chart with the output of: Change Destination.  The inputs are: 16% Laggards; 34% Late Majority; 34% Early Majority; 13.3% Early Adopters; 2% Innovators

    Info-Tech Insight

    Although there are different size categories, none can be ignored. Consider your budget when dealing with smaller groups, but also consider their impact.

    Refresh, retrain, restrain

    We don’t want people to revert.

    Don’t assume that because your staff have been trained and have access to the new technology that they will keep using it in the way they were trained. Or that they won’t revert back to their old methods or system.

    Put in place methods to remove completely or remove access to old systems. Schedule refresh training or skill enhancement sessions and stay vigilant.

    Research Authors

    Paul Binns

    Paul Binns

    Principal Research Advisor, Info-Tech Research Group

    With over 30 years in the IT industry, Paul brings to his work his experience as a Strategic Planner, Consultant, Enterprise Architect, IT Business Owner, Technologist, and Manager. Paul has worked with both small and large companies, local and international, and has had senior roles in government and the finance industry.

    Scott Young

    Scott Young

    Principal Research Advisor, Info-Tech Research Group

    Scott Young is a Director of Infrastructure Research at Info-Tech Research Group. Scott has worked in the technology field for over 17 years, with a strong focus on telecommunications and enterprise infrastructure architecture. He brings extensive practical experience in these areas of specialization, including IP networks, server hardware and OS, storage, and virtualization.

    Related Info-Tech Research

    User Group Analysis Workbook

    Use Info-Tech’s workbook to gather information about user groups, business processes, and day-to-day tasks to gain familiarity with your adopters.

    Governance and Management of Enterprise Software Implementation

    Use our research to engage users and receive timely feedback through demonstrations. Our iterative methodology with a task list focused on the business’ must-have functionality allows staff to return to their daily work sooner.

    Quality Management User Satisfaction Survey

    This IT satisfaction survey will assist you with early information to use for categorizing your users.

    Master Organizational Change Management Practices

    Using a soft, empathetic approach to change management is something that all PMOs should understand. Use our research to ensure you have an effective OCM plan that will ensure project success.

    Bibliography

    Beylis, Guillermo. “COVID-19 accelerates technology adoption and deepens inequality among workers in Latin America and the Caribbean.” World Bank Blogs, 4 March 2021. Web.

    Cleland, Kelley. “Successful User Adoption Strategies.” Insight Voices, 25 Apr. 2017. Web.

    Hiatt, Jeff. “The Prosci ADKAR ® Model.” PROSCI, 1994. Web.

    Malik, Priyanka. “The Kübler Ross Change Curve in the Workplace.” whatfix, 24 Feb. 2022. Web.

    Medhaugir, Tore. “6 Ways to Encourage Software Adoption.” XAIT, 9 March 2021. Web.

    Narayanan, Vishy. “What PwC Australia learned about fast tracking tech adoption during COVID-19” PWC, 13 Oct. 2020. Web.

    Sridharan, Mithun. “Crossing the Chasm: Technology Adoption Lifecycle.” Think Insights, 28 Jun 2022. Web.

    CIO Priorities 2022

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}328|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 10.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $31,499 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 9 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Innovation
    • Parent Category Link: /innovation
    • Understand how to respond to trends affecting your organization.
    • Determine your priorities based on current state and relevant internal factors.
    • Assign the right amount of resources to accomplish your vision.
    • Consider what new challenges outside of your control will demand a response.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    A priority is created when external factors hold strong synergy with internal goals and an organization responds by committing resources to either avert risk or seize opportunity. These are the priorities identified in the report:

    1. Reduce Friction in the Hybrid Operating Model
    2. Improve Your Ransomware Readiness
    3. Support an Employee-Centric Retention Strategy
    4. Design an Automation Platform
    5. Prepare to Report on New Environmental, Social, and Governance Metrics

    Impact and Result

    Update your strategic roadmap to include priorities that are critical and relevant for your organization based on a balance of external and internal factors.

    CIO Priorities 2022 Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. CIO Priorities 2022 – A report on the key priorities for competing in the digital economy.

    Discover Info-Tech’s five priorities for CIOs in 2022.

    • CIO Priorities Report for 2022

    2. Listen to the podcast series

    Hear directly from our contributing experts as they discuss their case studies with Brian Jackson.

    • Frictionless hybrid working: How the Harvard Business School did it
    • Close call with ransomware: A CIO recounts a near security nightmare
    • How a financial services company dodged "The Great Resignation"
    • How Allianz took a blockchain platform from pilot to 1 million transactions
    • CVS Health chairman David Dorman on healthcare's hybrid future

    Infographic

    Further reading

    CIO Priorities 2022

    A jumble of business-related words. Info-Tech’s 2022 Tech Trends survey asked CIOs for their top three priorities. Cluster analysis of their open-ended responses shows four key themes:
    1. Business process improvements
    2. Digital transformation or modernization
    3. Security
    4. Supporting revenue growth or recovery

    Info-Tech’s annual CIO priorities are formed from proprietary primary data and consultation with our internal experts with CIO stature

    2022 Tech Trends Survey CIO Demographic N=123

    Info-Tech’s Tech Trends 2022 survey was conducted between August and September 2021 and collected a total of 475 responses from IT decision makers, 123 of which were at the C-level. Fourteen countries and 16 industries are represented in the survey.

    2022 IT Talent Trends Survey CIO Demographic N=44

    Info-Tech’s IT Talent Trends 2022 survey was conducted between September and October 2021 and collected a total of 245 responses from IT decision makers, 44 of which were at the C-level. A broad range of countries from around the world are represented in the survey.

    Internal CIO Panels’ 125 Years Of Combined C-Level IT Experience

    Panels of former CIOs at Info-Tech focused on interpreting tech trends data and relating it to client experiences. Panels were conducted between November 2021 and January 2022.

    CEO-CIO Alignment Survey Benchmark Completed By 107 Different Organizations

    Info-Tech’s CEO-CIO Alignment program helps CIOs align with their supervisors by asking the right questions to ensure that IT stays on the right path. It determines how IT can best support the business’ top priorities and address the gaps in your strategy. In 2021, the benchmark was formed by 107 different organizations.

    Build IT alignment

    IT Management & Governance Diagnostic Benchmark Completed By 320 Different Organizations

    Info-Tech’s Management and Governance Diagnostic helps IT departments assess their strengths and weaknesses, prioritize their processes and build an improvement roadmap, and establish clear ownership of IT processes. In 2021, the benchmark was formed by data from 320 different organizations.

    Assess your IT processes

    The CIO priorities are informed by Info-Tech’s trends research reports and surveys

    Priority: “The fact or condition of being regarded or treated as more important than others.” (Lexico/Oxford)

    Trend: “A general direction in which something is developing or changing.” (Lexico/Oxford)

    A sequence of processes beginning with 'Sensing', 'Hypothesis', 'Validation', and ending with 'Trends, 'Priorities'. Under Sensing is Technology Research, Interviews & Insights, Gathering, and PESTLE. Under Hypothesis is Near-Future Probabilities, Identify Patterns, Identify Uncertainties, and Identify Human Benefits. Under Validation is Test Hypothesis, Case Studies, and Data-Driven Insights. Under Trends is Technology, Talent, and Industry. Under Priorities is CIO, Applications, Infrastructure, and Security.

    Visit Info-Tech’s Trends & Priorities Research Center

    Image called 'Defining the CIO Priorities for 2022'. Image shows 4 columns, Implications, Resource Investment, Amplifiers, and Actions and Outcomes, with 2 dotted lines, labeled External Context and Internal Context, running through all 4 columns and leading to bottom-right label called CIO Priorities Formed

    The Five Priorities

    Priorities to compete in the digital economy

    1. Reduce Friction in the Hybrid Operating Model
    2. Improve Your Ransomware Readiness
    3. Support an Employee-Centric Retention Strategy
    4. Design an Automation Platform
    5. Prepare to Report on New Environmental, Social, and Governance Metrics

    Reduce friction in the hybrid operating model

    Priority 01 | APO07 Human Resources Management

    Deliver solutions that create equity between remote workers and office workers and make collaboration a joy.

    Hybrid work is here to stay

    CIOs must deal with new pain points related to friction of collaboration

    In 2020, CIOs adapted to the pandemic’s disruption to offices by investing in capabilities to enable remote work. With restrictions on gathering in offices, even digital laggards had to shift to an all-remote work model for non-essential workers.

    Most popular technologies already invested in to facilitate better collaboration

    • 24% Web Conferencing
    • 23% Instant Messaging
    • 20% Document Collaboration

    In 2022, the focus shifts to solving problems created by the new hybrid operating model where some employees are in the office and some are working remotely. Without the ease of collaborating in a central hub, technology can play a role in reducing friction in several areas:

    • Foster more connections between employees. Remote workers are less likely to collaborate with people outside of their department and less likely to spontaneously collaborate with their peers. CIOs should provide a digital employee experience that fosters collaboration habits and keeps workers engaged.
    • Prevent employee attrition. With more workers reevaluating their careers and leaving their jobs, CIOs can help employees feel connected to the overall purpose of the organization. Finding a way to maintain culture in the new context will require new solutions. While conference room technology can be a bane to IT departments, making hybrid meetings effortless to facilitate will be more important.
    • Provide new standards for mediated collaboration. Meeting isn’t as easy as simply gathering around the same table anymore. CIOs need to provide structure around how hybrid meetings are conducted to create equity between all participants. Business continuity processes must also consider potential outages for collaboration services so employees can continue the work despite a major outage.

    Three in four organizations have a “hybrid” approach to work. (Tech Trends 2022 Survey)

    In most organizations, a hybrid model is being implemented. Only 14.9% of organizations are planning for almost everyone to return to the office, and only 9.9% for almost everyone to work remotely.

    Elizabeth Clark

    CIO, Harvard Business School

    "I want to create experiences that are sticky. That keep people coming back and engaging with their colleagues."

    Photo of Elizabeth Clark, CIO, Harvard Business School.

    Listen to the Tech Insights podcast:
    Frictionless hybrid working: How the Harvard Business School did it

    Internal interpretation: Harvard Business School

    • March 2020
      The pandemic disrupts in-class education at Harvard Business School. Their case study method of instruction that depends on in-person, high-quality student engagement is at risk. While students and faculty completed the winter semester remotely, the Dean and administration make the goal to restore the integrity of the classroom experience with equity for both remote and in-person students.
    • May 2020
      A cross-functional task force of about 100 people work intensively, conducting seven formal experiments, 80 smaller tests, and hundreds of polling data points, and a technology and facilities solution is designed: two 4K video cameras capturing both the faculty and the in-class students, new ceiling mics, three 85-inch TV screens, and students joining the videoconference from their laptops. A custom Zoom room, combining three separate rooms, integrated all the elements in one place and integrated with the lecture capture system and learning management system.
    • October 2020
      Sixteen classrooms are renovated to install the new solution. Students return to the classroom but in lower numbers due to limits on in-room capacity, but students rotate between the in-person and remote experience.
    • September 2021
      Renovations for the hybrid solution are complete in 26 classrooms and HBS has determined this will be its standard model for the classroom. The case method of teaching is kept alive and faculty and students are thrilled with the results.
    • November 2021
      HBS is adapting its solution for the classroom to its conference rooms and has built out eight different rooms for a hybrid experience. The 4K cameras and TV screens capture all participants in high fidelity as well as the blackboard.

    Photo of a renovated classroom with Zoom participants integrated with the in-person students.
    The renovated classrooms integrate all students, whether they are participating remotely or in person. (Image courtesy of Harvard Business School.)

    Implications: Organization, Process, Technology

    External

    • Organization – About half of IT practitioners in the Tech Trends 2022 survey feel that IT leaders, infrastructure and operations teams, and security teams were “very busy” in 2021. Capacity to adapt to hybrid work could be constrained by these factors.
    • Process – Organizations that want employees to benefit from being back in the office will have to rethink how workers can get more value out of in-person meetings that also require videoconference participation with remote workers.
    • Technology – Fifty-four percent of surveyed IT practitioners say the pandemic raised IT spending compared to the projections they made in 2020. Much of that investment went into adapting to a remote work environment.

    Internal

    • Organization – HBS added 30 people to its IT staff on term appointments to develop and implement its hybrid classroom solutions. Hires included instructional designers, support technicians, coordinators, and project managers.
    • Process – Only 25 students out of the full capacity of 95 could be in the classroom due to COVID-19 regulations. On-campus students rotated through the classroom seats. An app was created to post last-minute seat availability to keep the class full.
    • Technology – A Zoom room was created that combines three rooms to provide the full classroom experience: a view of the instructor, a clear view of each student that enlarges when they are speaking, and a view of the blackboard.

    Resources Applied

    Appetite for Technology

    CIOs and their direct supervisors both ranked internal collaboration tools as being a “critical need to adopt” in 2021, according to Info-Tech’s CEO-CIO Alignment Benchmark Report.

    Intent to Invest

    Ninety-seven percent of IT practitioners plan to invest in technology to facilitate better collaboration between employees in the office and outside the office by the end of 2022, according to Info-Tech’s 2022 Tech Trends survey.

    “We got so many nice compliments, which you don’t get in IT all the time. You get all the complaints, but it’s a rare case when people are enthusiastic about something that was delivered.” (Elizabeth Clark, CIO, Harvard Business School)

    Harvard Business School

    • IT staff were reassigned from other projects to prioritize building a hybrid classroom solution. A cloud migration and other portfolio projects were put on pause.
    • The annual capital A/V investment was doubled. The amount of spend on conference rooms was tripled.
    • Employees were hired to the media services team at a time when other areas of the organization were frozen.

    Outcomes at Harvard Business School

    The new normal at Harvard Business School

    New normal: HBS has found its new default operating model for the classroom and is extending its solution to its operating environment.

    Improved CX: The high-quality experience for students has helped avoid attrition despite the challenges of the pandemic.

    Engaged employees: The IT team is also engaged and feels connected to the mission of the school.

    Photo of a custom Zoom room bringing together multiple view of the classroom as well as all remote students.
    A custom Zoom room brings together multiple different views of the classroom into one single experience for remote students. (Image courtesy of Harvard Business School.)

    From Priorities to Action

    Make hybrid collaboration a joy

    Align with your organization’s goals for collaboration and customer interaction, with the target of high satisfaction for both customers and employees. Invest in capital projects to improve the fidelity of conference rooms, develop and test a new way of working, and increase IT capacity to alleviate pressure points.

    Foster both asynchronous and synchronous collaboration approaches to avoid calendars filling up with videoconference meetings to get things done and to accommodate workers contributing from across different time zones.

    “We’ll always have hybrid now. It’s opened people’s eyes and now we’re thinking about the future state. What new markets could we explore?” (Elizabeth Clark, CIO, Harvard Business School)

    Take the next step

    Run Better Meetings
    Hybrid, virtual, or in person – set meeting best practices that support your desired meeting norms.

    Prepare People Leaders for the Hybrid Work Environment
    Set hybrid work up for success by providing people leaders with the tools they need to lead within the new model.

    Hoteling and Hot-Desking: A Primer
    What you need to know regarding facilities, IT infrastructure, maintenance, security, and vendor solutions for desk hoteling and hot-desking.

    “Human Resources Management” gap between importance and effectiveness
    Info-Tech Research Group Management and Governance Diagnostic Benchmark 2021

    A bar chart illustrating the Human Resources Management gap between importance and effectiveness. The difference is marked as Delta 2.3.

    Improve your ransomware readiness

    Priority 02 | APO13 Security Strategy

    Mitigate the damage of successful ransomware intrusions and make recovery as painless as possible.

    The ransomware crisis threatens every organization

    Prevention alone won’t be enough against the forces behind ransomware.

    Cybersecurity is always top of mind for CIOs but tends to be deprioritized due to other demands related to digital transformation or due to cost pressures. That’s the case when we examine our data for this report.

    Cybersecurity ranked as the fourth-most important priority by CIOs in Info-Tech’s 2022 Tech Trends survey, behind business process improvement, digital transformation, and modernization. Popular ways to prepare for a successful attack include creating offline backups, purchasing insurance, and deploying new solutions to eradicate ransomware.

    CIOs and their direct supervisors ranked “Manage IT-Related Security” as the third-most important top IT priority on Info-Tech’s CEO-CIO Alignment Benchmark for 2021, in support of business goals to manage risk, comply with external regulation, and ensure service continuity.

    Most popular ways for organizations to prepare for the event of a successful ransomware attack:

    • 25% Created offline backups
    • 18% Purchased cyberinsurance
    • 19% New tech to eradicate ransomware

    Whatever priority an organization places on cybersecurity, when ransomware strikes, it quickly becomes a red alert scenario that disrupts normal operations and requires all hands on deck to respond. Sophisticated attacks executed at wide scale demonstrate that security can be bypassed without creating an alert. After that’s accomplished, the perpetrators build their leverage by exfiltrating data and encrypting critical systems.

    CIOs can plan to mitigate ransomware attacks in several constructive ways:

    • Business impact analysis. Determine the costs of an outage for specific periods and the system and data recovery points in time.
    • Engage a partner for 24/7 monitoring. Gain real-time awareness of your critical systems.
    • Review your identity access management (IAM) policies. Use of multi-factor authentication and limiting access to only the roles that need it reduces ransomware risk.

    50% of all organizations spent time and money specifically to prevent ransomware in the past year. (Info-Tech Tech Trends 2022 Survey)

    John Doe

    CIO, mid-sized manufacturing firm in the US

    "I want to create experiences that are sticky. That keep people coming back and engaging with their colleagues."

    Blank photo.

    Listen to the Tech Insights podcast:
    Close call with ransomware: a CIO recounts a near security nightmare

    Internal interpretation: US-based, mid-sized manufacturing firm

    • May 1, 2021
      A mid-sized manufacturing firm (“The Firm”) CIO gets a call from his head of security about odd things happening on the network. A call is made to Microsoft for support. Later that night, the report is that an unwanted crypto-mining application is the culprit. But a couple of hours later, that assessment is proven wrong when it’s realized that hundreds of systems are staged for a ransomware attack. All the attacker has to do is push the button.
    • May 2, 2021
      The Firm disconnects all its global sites to cut off new pathways for the malware to infect. All normal operations cease for 24 hours. It launches its cybersecurity insurance process. The CIO engages a new security vendor, CrowdStrike, to help respond. Employees begin working from home if they can so they can make use of their own internet service. The Firm has cut off its public internet connectivity and is severed from cloud services such as Azure storage and collaboration software.
    • May 4, 2021
      The hackers behind the attack are revealed by security forensics experts. A state-sponsored agency in Russia set up the ransomware and left it ready to execute. It sold the staged attack to a cybercriminal group, Doppel Spider. According to CrowdStrike, the group uses malware to run “big game hunting operations” and targets 18 different countries including the US and multiple industries, including manufacturing.
    • May 10, 2021
      The Firm has totally recovered from the ransomware incident and avoided any serious breach or paying a ransom. The CIO worked more hours than at any other point in his career, logging an estimated 130 hours over the two weeks.
    • November 2021
      The Firm never previously considered itself a ransomware target but has now reevaluated that stance. It has hired a service provider to run a security operations center on a 24/7 basis. It's implemented a more sophisticated detection and response model and implemented multi-factor authentication. It’s doubled its security spend in 2021 and will invest more in 2022.

    “Now we take the approach that if someone does get in, we're going to find them out.” (John Doe, CIO, “The Firm”)

    Implications: Organization, Process, Technology

    External

    • Organization – Organizations must consider how their employees play a role in preventing ransomware and plan for training to recognize phishing and other common traps. They must make plans for employees to continue their work if systems are disrupted by ransomware.
    • Process – Backup processes across multiple systems should be harmonized to have both recent and common points to recover from. Work with the understanding IT will have to take systems offline if ransomware is discovered and there is no time to ask for permission.
    • Technology – Organizations can benefit from security services provided by a forensics-focused vendor. Putting cybersecurity insurance in place not only provides financial protection but also guidance in what to do and which vendors to work with to prevent and recover from ransomware.

    Internal

    • Organization – The Firm was prepared with a business continuity plan to allow many of its employees to work remotely, which was necessary because the office network was incapacitated for ten days during recovery.
    • Process – Executives didn’t seek to assign blame for the security incident but took it as a signal there were some new costs involved to stay in business. It initiated new outsource relationships and hired one more full-time employee to shore up security resources.
    • Technology – New ransomware eradication software was deployed to 2,000 computers. Scripted processes automated much of the work, but in some cases full system rebuilds were required. Backup systems were disconnected from the network as soon as the malware was discovered.

    Resources Applied

    Consider the Alternative

    Organizations should consider how much a ransomware attack on critical systems would cost them if they were down for a minimum of 24-48 hours. Plan to invest an amount at least equal to the costs of that downtime.

    Ask for ID

    Implementing across-the-board multi-factor authentication reduces chances of infection and is cheap, with enterprise solutions ranging from $2 to $5 per user on average. Be strict and deny access when connections don’t authenticate.

    “You'll never stop everything from getting into the network. You can still focus on stopping the bad actors, but then if they do make it in, make sure they don't get far.” (John Doe, CIO, “The Firm”)

    “The Firm” (Mid-Sized Manufacturer)

    • During the crisis, The Firm paused all activities and focused solely on isolating and eliminating the ransomware threat.
    • New outsourcing relationship with a vendor provides a 24/7 Security Operations Center.
    • One more full-time employee on the security team.
    • Doubled investment in security in 2021 and will spend more in 2022.

    Outcomes at “The Firm” (Mid-Sized Manufacturer)

    The new cost of doing business

    Real-time security: While The Firm is still investing in prevention-based security, it is also developing its real-time detection and response capabilities. When ransomware makes it through the cracks, it wants to know as soon as possible and stop it.

    Leadership commitment: The C-suite is taking the experience as a wake-up call that more investment is required in today’s threat landscape. The Firm rates security more highly as an overall organizational goal, not just something for IT to worry about.

    Stock photo of someone using their phone while sitting at a computer, implying multi-factor authentication.
    The Firm now uses multi-factor authentication as part of its employee sign-on process. For employees, authenticating is commonly achieved by using a mobile app that receives a secret code from the issuer.

    From Priorities to Action

    Cybersecurity is everyone’s responsibility

    In Info-Tech’s CEO-CIO Alignment Benchmark for 2021, the business goal of “Manage Risk” was the single biggest point of disagreement between CIOs and their direct supervisors. CIOs rank it as the second-most important business goal, while CEOs rank it as sixth-most important.

    Organizations should align on managing risk as a top priority given the severity of the ransomware threat. The threat actors and nature of the attacks are such that top leadership must prepare for when ransomware hits. This includes halting operations quickly to contain damage, engaging third-party security forensics experts, and coordinating with government regulators.

    Cybersecurity strategies may be challenged to be effective without creating some friction for users. Organizations should look beyond multi-layer prevention strategies and lean toward quick detection and response, spending evenly across prevention, detection, and response solutions.

    Take the next step

    Create a Ransomware Incident Response Plan
    Don’t be the next headline. Determine your current readiness, response plan, and projects to close gaps.

    Simplify Identity and Access Management
    Select and implement IAM and produce vendor RFPs that will contain the capabilities you need, including multi-factor authentication.

    Cybersecurity Series Featuring Sandy Silk
    More from Info-Tech’s Senior Workshop Director Sandy Silk in this video series created while she was still at Harvard University.

    Gap between CIOs and CEOs in points allocated to “Manage risk” as a top business goal

    A bar chart illustrating the gap between CIOs and CEOs in points allocated to 'Manage risk' as a top business goal. The difference is marked as Delta 1.5.

    Support an employee-centric retention strategy

    Priority 03 | ITRG02 Leadership, Culture & Values

    Avoid being a victim of “The Great Resignation” by putting employees at the center of an experience that will engage them with clear career path development, purposeful work, and transparent feedback.

    Defining an employee-first culture that improves retention

    The Great resignation isn’t good for firms

    In 2021, many workers decided to leave their jobs. Working contexts were disrupted by the pandemic and that saw non-essential workers sent home to work, while essential workers were asked to continue to come into work despite the risks of COVID-19. These disruptions may have contributed to many workers reevaluating their professional goals and weighing their values differently. At the same time, 2021 saw a surging economy and many new job opportunities to create a talent-hungry market. Many workers could have been motivated to take a new opportunity to increase their salary or receive other benefits such as more flexibility.

    Annual turnover rate for all us employees on the rise

    • 20% – Jan.-Aug. 2020, Dipped from 22% in 2019
    • 25% Jan.-Aug. 2021, New record high
    • Data from Visier Inc.

    When you can’t pay them, develop them

    IT may be less affected than other departments by this trend. Info-Tech’s 2022 IT Talent Trends Report shows that on average, estimated turnover rate in IT is lower than the rest of the organization. Almost half of respondents estimated their organization’s voluntary turnover rate was 10% or higher. Only 30% of respondents estimate that IT’s voluntary turnover rate is in the same range. However, CIOs working in industries with the highest turnover rates will have to work to keep their workers engaged and satisfied, as IT skills are easily transferred to other industries.

    49% ranked “enabling learning & development within IT” as high priority, more than any other single challenge. (IT Talent Trends 2022 Survey, N=227)

    A bar chart of 'Industries with highest turnover rates (%)' with 'Leisure and Hospitality' at 6.4%, 'Trade, Transportation & Utilities' at 3.6%, 'Professional and Business' at 3.3%, and 'Other Services' at 3.1%. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2022.

    Jeff Previte

    Executive Vice-President of IT, CrossCountry Mortgage

    “We have to get to know the individual at a personal level … Not just talking about the business, but getting to know the person."

    Photo of Jeff Previte, Executive Vice-President of IT, CrossCountry Mortgage.

    Listen to the Tech Insights podcast:
    How a financial services company dodged ‘The Great Resignation’

    Internal interpretation: CrossCountry Mortgage

    • May 2019
      Jeff Previte joins Cleveland, Ohio-based CrossCountry Mortgage in the CIO role. The company faces a challenge with employee turnover, particularly in IT. The firm is a sales-focused organization and saw its turnover rate reach as high as 60%. Yet Previte recognized that IT had some meaningful goals to achieve and would need to attract – and retain – some higher caliber talent. His first objective in his new role was to meet with IT employees and business leadership to set priorities.
    • July 2019
      Previte takes a “people-first” approach to leadership and meets his staff face-to-face to understand their personal situations. He sets to work on defining roles and responsibilities in the organization, spending about a fifth of his time on defining the strategy.
    • June 2020
      Previte assigned his leadership team to McLean & Company’s Design an Impactful Employee Development Program. From there, the team developed a Salesforce tool called the Career Development Workbook. “We had some very passionate developers and admins that wanted to build a home-grown tool,” he says. It turns McLean & Company’s process into a digital tool employees can use to reflect on their careers and explore their next steps. It helps facilitate development conversations with managers.
    • January 2021
      CrossCountry Mortgage changes its approach to career development activities. Going to external conferences and training courses is reduced to just 30% of that effort. The rest is by doing hands-on work at the company. Previte aligned with his executives and road-mapped IT projects annually. Based on employee’s interests, opportunities are found to carve out time from usual day-to-day activities to spend time on a project in a new area. When there’s a business need, someone internally can be ready to transition roles.
    • June 2021
      In the two years since joining the company, Previte has reduced the turnover rate to just 12%. The IT department has grown to more adequately meet the needs of the business and employees are engaged with more opportunities to develop their careers. Instead of focusing on compensation, Previte focused more on engaging employees with a developmentally dedicated environment and continuous hands-on learning.

    “It’s come down to a culture shift. Folks have an idea of where we’re headed as an organization, where we’re headed as an IT team, and how their role contributes to that.” (Jeff Previte, EVP of IT, CrossCountry Mortgage)

    Implications: Organization, Process, Technology

    External

    • Organization – A high priority is being placed on improving IT’s maturity through its talent. Enabling learning and development in IT, enabling departmental innovation, and recruiting are the top three highest priorities according to IT Talent Trends 2022 survey responses.
    • Process – Recruiting is more challenging for industries that operate primarily onsite, according to McLean & Company's 2022 HR Trends Report. They face more challenges attracting applications, more rejected offers, and more candidate ghosting compared to remote-capable industries.
    • Technology – Providing a great employee experience through digital tools is more important as many organizations see a mix of workers in the office and at home. These tools can help connect colleagues, foster professional development, and improve the candidate experience.

    Internal

    • Organization – CrossCountry Mortgage faced a situation where IT employees did not have clarity on their roles and responsibilities. In terms of salary, it wasn’t offering at the high end compared to other employers in Cleveland.
    • Process – To foster a culture of growth and development, CrossCountry Mortgage put in place a performance assessment system that encouraged reflection and goal setting, aided by collaboration with a manager.
    • Technology – The high turnover rate was limiting CrossCountry Mortgage from achieving the level of maturity it needed to support the company’s goals. It ingrained its new PA process with a custom build of a Salesforce tool.

    Resources Applied

    Show me the money

    Almost six in ten Talent Trends survey respondents identified salary and compensation as the reason that employees resigned in the past year. Organizations looking to engage employees must first pay a fair salary according to market and industry conditions.

    Build me up

    Professional development and opportunity for innovative work are the next two most common reasons for resignations. Organizations must ensure they create enough capacity to allow workers time to spend on development.

    “Building our own solution created an element of engagement. There was a sense of ownership that the team had in thinking through this.” (Jeff Previte, CrossCountry Mortgage)

    CrossCountry Mortgage

    • Executive time: CIO spends 10-20% of his time on activities related to designing the approach.
    • Leveraged memberships with Info-Tech Research Group and McLean & Company to define professional development process.
    • Internal IT develops automated workflow in Salesforce.
    • Hired additional IT staff to build out overall capacity and create time for development activities.

    Outcomes at CrossCountry Mortgage

    Engaged IT workforce

    The Great Maturation: IT staff turnover rate dropped to 10-12% and IT talent is developing on the job to improve the department’s overall skill level. More IT staff on hand and more engaged workers mean IT can deliver higher maturity level results.

    Alignment achieved: Connecting IT’s initiatives to the vision of the C-suite creates a clear purpose for IT in its initiatives. Staff understand what they need to achieve to progress their careers and can grow while they work.

    Photo of employees from CrossCountry Mortgage assisting with a distribution event.
    Employees from CrossCountry Mortgage headquarters assist with a drive-thru distribution event for the Cleveland Food Bank on Dec. 17, 2021. (Image courtesy of CrossCountry Mortgage.)

    From Priorities to Action

    Staff retention is a leadership priority

    The Great Resignation trend is bringing attention to employee engagement and staff retention. IT departments are busier than ever during the pandemic as they work overtime to keep up with a remote workforce and new security threats. At the same time, IT talent is among the most coveted on the market.

    CIOs need to develop a people-first approach to improve the employee experience. Beyond compensation, IT workers need clarity in terms of their career paths, a direct connection between their work and the goals of the organization, and time set aside for professional development.

    Info-Tech’s 2021 benchmark for “Leadership, Culture & Values” shows that most organizations rate this capability very highly (9) but see room to improve on their effectiveness (6.9).

    Take the next step

    IT Talent Trends 2022
    See how IT talent trends are shifting through the pandemic and understand how themes like The Great Resignation has impacted IT.

    McLean & Company’s Modernize Performance Management
    Customize the building blocks of performance management to best fit organizational needs to impact individual and organizational performance, productivity, and engagement.

    Redesign Your IT Organizational Structure
    Define future-state work units, roles, and responsibilities that will enable the IT organization to complete the work that needs to be done.

    “Leadership, Culture & Values” gap between importance and effectiveness
    Info-Tech Research Group Management and Governance Diagnostic Benchmark 2021

    A bar chart illustrating the 'Leadership, Culture & Values' gap between importance and effectiveness. The difference is marked as Delta 2.1.

    Design an automation platform

    Priority 04 | APO04 Innovation

    Position yourself to buy or build a platform that will enable new automation opportunities through seamless integration.

    Build it or buy it, but platform integration can yield great benefits

    Necessity is the mother of innovation

    When it’s said that digital transformation accelerated during the pandemic, what’s really meant is that processes that were formerly done manually became automated through software. In responses to the Tech Trends survey, CIOs say digital transformation was more of a focus during the pandemic, and eight in ten CIOs also say they shifted more than 20% of their organization’s processes to digital during the pandemic. Automating tasks through software can be called digitalization.

    Most organizations became more digitalized during the pandemic. But how they pursued it depends on their IT maturity. For digital laggards, partnering with a technology services platform is the path of least resistance. For sophisticated innovators, they can consider building a platform to address the specific needs of their business process. Doing so requires the foundation of an existing “digital factory” or innovation arm where new technologies can be tested, proofs of concept developed, and external partnerships formed. Patience is key with these efforts, as not every investment will yield immediate returns and some will fail outright.

    Build it or buy it, platform participants integrate with their existing systems through application programming interfaces (APIs). Organizations should determine their platform strategies based on maturity, then look to integrate the business processes that will yield the most gains.

    What role should you play in the platform ecosystem?

    A table with levels on the maturity ladder laid out as a sprint. Column headers are maturity levels 'Struggle', 'Support', 'Optimize', 'Expand', and 'Transform', row headers are 'Maturity' and 'Role'. Roles are assigned to one or many levels. 'Improve' is solely under Struggle. 'Integrate' spans from Support to Transform. 'Buy' spans Support to Expand. 'Build' begins midway through Expand and all of Transform. 'Partner' spans from Optimize to halfway through Transform.

    68% of CIOs say digital transformation became much more of a focus for their organization during the pandemic (Info-Tech Tech Trends 2022 Survey)

    Bob Crozier

    Chief Architect, Allianz Technology & Global Head of Blockchain, Allianz Technology SE

    "Smart contracts are really just workflows between counterparties."

    Photo of Bob Crozier, Chief Architect, Allianz Technology & Global Head of Blockchain, Allianz Technology SE.

    Listen to the Tech Insights podcast:
    How Allianz took a blockchain platform from pilot to 1 million transactions

    Internal interpretation: Allianz Technology

    • 2015
      After smart contracts are demonstrated on the Ethereum blockchain, Allianz and other insurers recognize the business value. There is potential to use the capability to administer a complex, multi-party contract where the presence of the reinsurer in the risk transfer ecosystem is required. Manual contracts could be turned into code and automated. Allianz organized an early proof of concept around a theoretical pandemic excessive loss contract.
    • 2018
      Allianz Chief Architect Bob Crozier is leading the Global Blockchain Center of Competence for Allianz. They educate Allianz on the value of blockchain for business. They also partner with a joint venture between the Technology University of Munich and the state of Bavaria. A cohort of Masters students is looking for real business problems to solve with open-source distributed ledger technology. Allianz puts its problem statement in front of the group. A student team presents a proof of concept for an international motor insurance claims settlement and it comes in second place at a pitch day competition.
    • 2019
      Allianz brings the concept back in-house, and its business leaders return to the concept. Startup Luther Systems is engaged to build a minimum-viable product for the solution, with the goal being a pilot involving three or four subsidiaries in different countries. The Blockchain Center begins communicating with 25 Allianz subsidiaries that will eventually deploy the platform.
    • 2020
      Allianz is in build mode on its international motor insurance claims platform. It leverages its internal Dev/SecOps teams based in Munich and in India.
    • May 2021
      Allianz goes live with its new platform on May 17, decommissioning its old system and migrating all live claims data onto the new blockchain platform. It sees 400 concurrent users go live across Europe.
    • January 2022
      Allianz mines its one-millionth block to its ledger on Jan. 19, with each block representing a peer-to-peer transaction across its 25 subsidiaries in different countries. The platform has settled hundreds of millions of dollars.

    Stock photo of two people arguing over a car crash.

    Implications: Organization, Process, Technology

    External

    • Organization – To explore emerging technologies like blockchain, organizations need staff that are accountable for innovation and have leeway to develop proofs of concept. External partners are often required to bring in fresh ideas and move quickly towards an MVP.
    • Process – According to the Tech Trends 2022 survey, 84% of CIOs consider automation a high-value digital capability, and 77% say identity verification is a high-value capability. A blockchain platform using smart contracts can deliver those.
    • Technology – The Linux Foundation’s Hyperledger Fabric is an open-source blockchain technology that’s become popular in the financial industry for its method of forming consensus and its modular architecture. It’s been adopted by USAA, MasterCard, and PayPal. It also underpins the IBM Blockchain Platform and is supported by Azure Blockchain.

    Internal

    • Organization – Allianz is a holding company that owns Allianz Technology and 25 operating entities across Europe. It uses the technology arm to innovate on the business process and creates shared platforms that its entities can integrate with to automate across the value chain.
    • Process – Initial interest in smart contracts on blockchain were funneled into a student competition, where a proof of concept was developed. Allianz partnered with a startup to develop an MVP, then developed the platform while aligning with its business units ahead of launch.
    • Technology – Allianz built its blockchain platform on Hyperledger Fabric because it was a permissioned system, unlike other public permissionless blockchains such as Ethereum, and because its mining mechanism was much more energy efficient compared to other blockchains using Proof of Work consensus models.

    Resources Applied

    Time to innovate

    Exploring emerging technology for potential use cases is difficult for staff tasked with running day-to-day operations. Organizations serious about innovation create a separate team that can focus on “moonshot” projects and connect with external partners.

    Long-term ROI

    Automation of new business processes often requires a high upfront initial investment for a long-term efficiency gain. A proof of concept should demonstrate clear business value that can be repeated often and for a long period.

    “My next project has to deliver in the tens of millions of value in return. The bar is high and that’s what it should be for a business of our size.” (Bob Crozier, Allianz)

    Allianz

    • Several operating entities from different countries supplied subject matter expertise and helped with the testing process.
    • Allianz Technology team has eight staff members. It is augmented by Luther Systems and the team at industry group B3i.
    • Funding of less than $5 million to develop. Dev team continues to add improvements.
    • Operating requires just one full-time employee plus infrastructure costs, mostly for public cloud hosting.

    Outcomes at Allianz

    From insurer to platform provider

    Deliver your own SaaS: Allianz Technology built its blockchain-based claims settlement platform and its subsidiaries consume it as software as a service. The platform runs on a distributed architecture across Europe, with each node running the same version of the software. Operating entities can also integrate their own systems to the platform via APIs and further automate business processes such as billing.

    Ready to scale: After processing one million transactions, the international claims settlement platform is proven and ready to add more participants. Crozier sees auto repair shops and auto manufacturers as the next logical users.

    Stock photo of Blockchain.
    Allianz is a shareholder of the Blockchain Insurance Industry Initiative (B3i). It is providing a platform used by a group of insurance companies in the commercial and reinsurance space.

    When should we use blockchain? THREE key criteria:

    • Redundant processes
      Different entities follow the same process to achieve the desired outcome.
    • Audit trail
      Accountability in the decision making must be documented.
    • Reconciliation
      Parties need to be able to resolve disputes by tracing back to the truth.

    From Priorities to Action

    It’s a build vs. buy question for platforms

    Allianz was able to build a platform for its group of European subsidiaries because of its established digital factory and commitment to innovation. Allianz Technology is at the “innovate” level of IT maturity, allowing it to create a platform that subsidiaries can integrate with via APIs. For firms that are lower on the IT maturity scale, buying a platform solution is the better path to automation. These firms will be concerned with integrating their legacy systems to platforms that can reduce the friction of their operating environments and introduce modern new capabilities.

    From Info-Tech’s Build a Winning Business Process Automation Playbook

    An infographic comparing pros and cons of Build versus Buy. On the 'Build: High Delivery Capacity & Capability' side is 'Custom Development', 'Data Integration', 'AI/ML', 'Configuration', 'Native Workflow', and 'Low & No Code'. On the 'Buy: Low Delivery Capacity & Capability' side is 'Outsource Development', 'iPaaS', 'Chatbots', 'iBPMS & Rules Engines', 'RPA', and 'Point Solutions'.

    Take the next step

    Accelerate Your Automation Processes
    Integrate automation solutions and take the first steps to building an automation suite.

    Build Effective Enterprise Integration on the Back of Business Process
    From the backend to the frontlines – let enterprise integration help your business processes fly.

    Evolve Your Business Through Innovation
    Innovation teams are tasked with the responsibility of ensuring that their organizations are in the best position to succeed while the world is in a period of turmoil, chaos, and uncertainty.

    “Innovation” gap between importance and effectiveness Info-Tech Research Group Management and Governance Diagnostic Benchmark 2021

    A bar chart illustrating the 'Innovation' gap between importance and effectiveness. The difference is marked as Delta 2.1.

    Prepare to report on new environmental, social, and governance (ESG) metrics

    Priority 05 | ITRG06 Business Intelligence and Reporting

    Be ready to either lead or support initiatives to meet the criteria of new ESG reporting mandates and work toward disclosure reporting solutions.

    Time to get serious about ESG

    What does CSR or ESG mean to a CIO?

    Humans are putting increasing pressure on the planet’s natural environment and creating catastrophic risks as a result. Efforts to mitigate these risks have been underway for the past 30 years, but in the decade ahead regulators are likely to impose more strict requirements that will be linked to the financial value of an organization. Various voluntary frameworks exist for reporting on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) or corporate social responsibility (CSR) metrics. But now there are efforts underway to unify and clarify those standards.

    The most advanced effort toward a global set of standards is in the environmental area. At the United Nations’ COP26 summit in Scotland last November, the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) announced its headquarters (Frankfurt) and three other international office locations (Montreal, San Francisco, and London) and its roadmap for public consultations. It is working with an array of voluntary standards groups toward a consensus.

    In Info-Tech’s 2022 Tech Trends survey, two-thirds of CIOs say their organization is committed to reducing greenhouse gas emissions, yet only 40% say their organizational leadership is very concerned with reducing those emissions. CIOs will need to consider how to align organizational concern with internal commitments and new regulatory pressures. They may investigate new real-time reporting solutions that could serve as a competitive differentiator on ESG.

    Standards informing the ISSB’s global set of climate standards

    A row of logos of organizations that inform ISSB's global set of climate standards.

    67% of CIOs say their organization is committed to reducing greenhouse gases, with one-third saying that commitment is public. (Info-Tech Tech Trends 2022 Survey)

    40% of CIOs say their organizational leadership is very concerned with reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

    David W. Dorman

    Chairman of the board, CVS Health

    “ESG is a question of what you do in the microcosm of your company to make sure there is a clear, level playing field – that there is a color-blind, gender-blind meritocracy available – that you are aware that not in every case can you achieve that without really focusing on it. It’s not going to happen on its own. That’s why our commitments have real dollars behind them and real focus behind them because we want to be the very best at doing them.”

    Photo of David W. Dorman, Chairman of the Board, CVS Health.

    Listen to the Tech Insights podcast:
    CVS Health chairman David Dorman on healthcare's hybrid future

    Internal interpretation: CVS Health

    CVS Health established a new steering committee of senior leaders in 2020 to oversee ESG commitments. It designs its corporate social responsibility strategy, Transform Health 2030, by aligning company activities in four key areas: healthy people, healthy business, healthy planet, and healthy community. The strategy aligns with the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals. In alignment with these goals, CVS identifies material topics where the company has the most ability to make an impact. In 2020, its top three topics were:

    1. Access to quality health care
    2. Patient and customer safety
    3. Data protection and privacy
    Material Topic
    Access to quality health care
    Material Topic
    Patient and customer safety
    Material Topic
    Data protection and privacy
    Technology Initiative
    MinuteClinic’s Virtual Collaboration for Nurses

    CVS provided Apple iPads compliant with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) to clinics in a phased approach, providing training to more than 700 providers in 26 states by February 2021. Nurses could use the iPads to attend virtual morning huddles and access clinical education. Nurses could connect virtually with other healthcare experts to collaborate on delivering patient care in real-time. The project was able to scale across the country through a $50,000 American Nurses Credentialing Center Pathway Award. (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

    Technology Initiative
    MinuteClinic’s E-Clinic

    MinuteClinics launched this telehealth solution in response to the pandemic, rolling it out in three weeks. The solution complemented video visits delivered in partnership with the Teladoc platform. Visits cost $59 and are covered by Aetna insurance plans, a subsidiary of CVS Health. It hosted more than 20,000 E-Clinic visits through the end of 2020. CVS connected its HealthHUBs to the solution to increase capacity in place of walk-in appointments and managed patients via phone for medication adherence and care plans. CVS also helped behavioral health providers transition patients to virtual visits. (CVS Health)

    Technology Initiative
    Next Generation Authentication Platform

    CVS patented this solution to authenticate customers accessing digital channels. It makes use of the available biometrics data and contextual information to validate identity without the need for a password. CVS planned to extend the platform to voice channels as well, using voiceprint technology. The solution prevents unauthorized access to sensitive health data while providing seamless access for customers. (LinkedIn)

    Implications: Organization, Process, Technology

    External

    • Organization – Since the mid-2010s, younger investors have demonstrated reliance on ESG data when making investment decisions, resulting in the creation of voluntary standards that offered varied approaches. Organizations in ESG exchange-traded funds are outperforming the overall S&P 500 (S&P Global Market Intelligence).
    • Process – Organizations are issuing ESG reports today despite the absence of clear rules to follow for reporting results. With regulators expected to step in to establish more rigid guidelines, many organizations will need to revisit their approach to ESG reports.
    • Technology – Real-time reporting of ESG metrics will become a competitive advantage before 2030. Engineering a solution that can alert organizations to poor performance on ESG measures and allow them to respond could avert losing market value.

    Internal

    • Organization – CVS Health established an ESG Steering Committee in 2020 composed of senior leaders including its chief governance officers, chief sustainability officer, chief risk officer, and controller and SVP of investor relations. It is supported by the ESG Operating Committee.
    • Process – CVS conducts a materiality assessment in accordance with Global Reporting Initiative standards to determine the most significant ESG impacts it can make and what topics most influence the decisions of stakeholders. It engages with various stakeholder groups on CSR topics.
    • Technology – CVS technology initiatives during the pandemic focused on supporting patients and employees in collaborating on health care delivery using virtual solutions, providing rich digital experiences that are easily accessible while upholding high security and privacy standards.

    Resources Applied

    Lack of commitment

    While 83% of businesses state support for the Sustainable Development Goals outlined by the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), only 40% make measurable commitments to their goals.

    Show your work

    The GRI recommends organizations not only align their activities with sustainable development goals but also demonstrate contributions to specific targets in reporting on the positive actions they carry out. (GRI, “State of Progress: Business Contributions to the SDGS.”)

    “We end up with a longstanding commitment to diversity because that’s what our customer base looks like.” (David Dorman, CVS Health)

    CVS Health

    • The MinuteClinic Virtual Collaboration solution was piloted in Houston, demonstrated success, and won additional $50,000 funding from the Pathway to Excellence Award to scale the program across the country (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.).
    • The Next-Gen Authentication solution is provided by the vendor HYPR. It is deployed to ten million users and looking to scale to 30 million more. Pricing for enterprises is quoted at $1 per user, but volume pricing would apply to CVS (HYPR).

    Outcomes at CVS Health

    Delivering on hybrid healthcare solutions

    iPads for collaboration: Healthcare practitioners in the MinuteClinic Virtual Collaboration initiative agreed that it improved the use of interprofessional teams, working well virtually with others, and improved access to professional resources (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

    Remote healthcare: Saw a 400% increase in MinuteClinic virtual visits in 2020 (CVS Health).

    Verified ID: The Next Generation Authentication platform allowed customers to register for a COVID-19 vaccination appointment. CVS has delivered more than 50 million vaccines (LinkedIn).

    Stock photo of a doctor with an iPad.
    CVS Health is making use of digital channels to connect its customers and health practitioners to a services platform that can supplement visits to a retail or clinic location to receive diagnostics and first-hand care.

    From Priorities to Action

    Become your organization’s ESG Expert

    The risks posed to organizations and wider society are becoming more severe, driving a transition from voluntary frameworks for ESG goals to a mandatory one that’s enforced by investors and governments. Organizations will be expected to tie their core activities to a defined set of ESG goals and maintain a balance sheet of their positive and negative impacts. CIOs should become experts in ESG disclosure requirements and recommend the steps needed to meet or exceed competitors’ efforts. If a leadership vacuum for ESG accountability exists, CIOs can either seek to support their peers that are likely to become accountable or take a leadership role in overseeing the area. CIOs should start working toward solutions that deliver real-time reporting on ESG goals to make reporting frictionless.

    “If you don’t have ESG oversight at the highest levels of the company, it won’t wind up getting the focus. That’s why we review it at the Board multiple times per year. We have an annual report, we compare how we did, what we intended to do, where did we fall short, where did we exceed, and where we can run for daylight to do more.” (David Dorman, CVS Health)

    Take the next step

    ESG Disclosures: How Will We Record Status Updates on the World We Are Creating?
    Prepare for the era of mandated environmental, social, and governance disclosures.

    Private Equity and Venture Capital Growing Impact of ESG Report
    Learn about how the growing impact of ESG affects both your organization and IT specifically, including challenges and opportunities, with expert assistance.

    “Business Intelligence and Reporting” gap between importance and effectiveness
    Info-Tech Research Group Management and Governance Diagnostic Benchmark 2021

    A bar chart illustrating the 'BI and Reporting' gap between importance and effectiveness. The difference is marked as Delta 2.4.

    The Five Priorities

    Priorities to compete in the digital economy

    1. Reduce Friction in the Hybrid Operating Model
    2. Improve Your Ransomware Readiness
    3. Support an Employee-Centric Retention Strategy
    4. Design an Automation Platform
    5. Prepare to Report on New Environmental, Social, and Governance Metrics

    Contributing Experts

    Elizabeth Clark

    CIO, Harvard Business School
    Photo of Elizabeth Clark, CIO, Harvard Business School.

    Jeff Previte

    Executive Vice-President of IT, CrossCountry Mortgage
    Photo of Jeff Previte, Executive Vice-President of IT, CrossCountry Mortgage.

    Bob Crozier

    Chief Architect, Allianz Technology & Global Head of Blockchain, Allianz Technology SE
    Photo of Bob Crozier, Chief Architect, Allianz Technology & Global Head of Blockchain, Allianz Technology SE.

    David W. Dorman

    Chairman of the Board, CVS Health
    Photo of David W. Dorman, Chairman of the Board, CVS Health.

    Info-Tech’s internal CIO panel contributors

    • Bryan Tutor
    • John Kemp
    • Mike Schembri
    • Janice Clatterbuck
    • Sandy Silk
    • Sallie Wright
    • David Wallace
    • Ken McGee
    • Mike Tweedie
    • Cole Cioran
    • Kevin Tucker
    • Angelina Atkins
    • Yakov Kofner
    Photo of an internal CIO panel contributor. Photo of an internal CIO panel contributor.Photo of an internal CIO panel contributor.
    Photo of an internal CIO panel contributor.Photo of an internal CIO panel contributor.Photo of an internal CIO panel contributor.Photo of an internal CIO panel contributor.
    Photo of an internal CIO panel contributor.Photo of an internal CIO panel contributor.Photo of an internal CIO panel contributor.

    Thank you for your support

    Logo for the Blockchain Research Institute.
    Blockchain Research Institute

    Bibliography – CIO Priorities 2022

    “2020 Corporate Social Responsibility Report.” CVS Health, 2020, p. 127. Web.

    “Adversary: Doppel Spider - Threat Actor.” Crowdstrike Adversary Universe, 2021. Accessed 29 Dec. 2021.

    “Aetna CVS Health Success Story.” HYPR, n.d. Accessed 6 Feb. 2022.

    Baig, Aamer. “The CIO agenda for the next 12 months: Six make-or-break priorities.” McKinsey Digital, 1 Nov. 2021. Web.

    Ball, Sarah, Kristene Diggins, Nairobi Martindale, Angela Patterson, Anne M. Pohnert, Jacinta Thomas, Tammy Todd, and Melissa Bates. “2020 ANCC Pathway Award® winner.” Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc., 2021. Accessed 6 Feb. 2022.

    “Canadian Universities Propose Designs for a Central Bank Digital Currency.” Bank of Canada, 11 Feb. 2021. Accessed 14 Dec. 2021.

    “Carbon Sequestration in Wetlands.” MN Board of Water and Soil Resources, n.d. Accessed 15 Nov. 2021.

    “CCM Honored as a NorthCoast 99 Award Winner.” CrossCountry Mortgage, 1 Dec. 2021. Web.

    Cheek, Catherine. “Four Things We Learned About the Resignation Wave–and What to Do Next.” Visier Inc. (blog), 5 Oct. 2021. Web.

    “Companies Using Hyperledger Fabric, Market Share, Customers and Competitors.” HG Insights, 2022. Accessed 25 Jan. 2022.

    “IFRS Foundation Announces International Sustainability Standards Board, Consolidation with CDSB and VRF, and Publication of Prototype Disclosure Requirements.” IFRS, 3 Nov. 2021. Web.

    “IT Priorities for 2022: A CIO Report.” Mindsight, 28 Oct. 2021. Web.

    “Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey.” Databases, Tables & Calculators by Subject, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2022. Accessed 9 Feb. 2022.

    Kumar, Rashmi, and Michael Krigsman. “CIO Planning and Investment Strategy 2022.” CXOTalk, 13 Sept. 2021. Web.

    Leonhardt, Megan. “The Great Resignation Is Hitting These Industries Hardest.” Fortune, 16 Nov. 2021. Accessed 7 Jan. 2022.

    “Most companies align with SDGs – but more to do on assessing progress.” Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), 17 Jan. 2022. Web.

    Navagamuwa, Roshan. “Beyond Passwords: Enhancing Data Protection and Consumer Experience.” LinkedIn, 15 Dec. 2020.

    Ojo, Oluwaseyi. “Achieving Digital Business Transformation Using COBIT 2019.” ISACA, 19 Aug. 2019. Web.

    “Priority.” Lexico.com, Oxford University Press, 2021. Web.

    Riebold, Jan, and Yannick Bartens. “Reinventing the Digital IT Operating Model for the ‘New Normal.’” Capgemini Worldwide, 3 Nov. 2020. Web.

    Samuels, Mark. “The CIO’s next priority: Using the tech budget for growth.” ZDNet, 1 Sept. 2021. Accessed 1 Nov. 2021.

    Sayer, Peter. “Exclusive Survey: CIOs Outline Tech Priorities for 2021-22.” CIO, 5 Oct. 2021. Web.

    Shacklett, Mary E. “Where IT Leaders Are Likely to Spend Budget in 2022.” InformationWeek, 10 Aug. 2021. Web.

    “Table 4. Quits Levels and Rates by Industry and Region, Seasonally Adjusted - 2021 M11 Results.” U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Economic News Release, 1 Jan. 2022. Accessed 7 Jan. 2022.

    “Technology Priorities CIOs Must Address in 2022.” Gartner, 19 Oct. 2021. Accessed 1 Nov. 2021.

    Thomson, Joel. Technology, Talent, and the Future Workplace: Canadian CIO Outlook 2021. The Conference Board of Canada, 7 Dec. 2021. Web.

    “Trend.” Lexico.com, Oxford University Press, 2021. Web.

    Vellante, Dave. “CIOs signal hybrid work will power tech spending through 2022.” SiliconANGLE, 25 Sept. 2021. Web.

    Whieldon, Esther, and Robert Clark. “ESG funds beat out S&P 500 in 1st year of COVID-19; how 1 fund shot to the top.” S&P Global Market Intelligence, April 2021. Accessed Dec. 2021.

    Create and Manage Enterprise Data Models

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}340|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.2/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $7,263 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 16 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Data Management
    • Parent Category Link: /data-management
    • Business executives don’t understand the value of Conceptual and Logical Data Models and how they define their data assets.
    • Data, like mercury, is difficult to manage and contain.
    • IT needs to justify the time and cost of developing and maintaining Data Models.
    • Data as an asset is only perceived from a physical point of view, and the metadata that provides context and definition is often ignored.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Data Models tell the story of the organization and its data in pictures to be used by a business as a tool to evolve the business capabilities and processes.
    • Data Architecture and Data Modeling have different purposes and should be represented as two distinct processes within the software development lifecycle (SDLC).
    • The Conceptual Model provides a quick win for both business and IT because it can convey abstract business concepts and thereby compartmentalize the problem space.

    Impact and Result

    • A Conceptual Model can be used to define the semantics and relationships for your analytical layer.
      • It provides a visual representation of your data in the semantics of business.
      • It acts as the anchor point for all data lineages.
      • It can be used by business users and IT for data warehouse and analytical planning.
      • It provides the taxonomies for data access profiles.
      • It acts as the basis for your Enterprise Logical and Message Models.

    Create and Manage Enterprise Data Models Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should create enterprise data models, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Setting the stage

    Prepare your environment for data architecture.

    • Enterprise Data Models

    2. Revisit your SDLC

    Revisit your SDLC to embed data architecture.

    • Enterprise Architecture Tool Selection

    3. Develop a Conceptual Model

    Create and maintain your Conceptual Data Model via an iterative process.

    4. Data Modeling Playbook

    View the main deliverable with sample models.

    • Data Modeling Playbook
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Create and Manage Enterprise Data Models

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Establish the Data Architecture Practice

    The Purpose

    Understand the context and goals of data architecture in your organization.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A foundation for your data architecture practice.

    Activities

    1.1 Review the business context.

    1.2 Obtain business commitment and expectations for data architecture.

    1.3 Define data architecture as a discipline, its role, and the deliverables.

    1.4 Revisit your SDLC to embed data architecture.

    1.5 Modeling tool acquisition if required.

    Outputs

    Data Architecture vision and mission and governance.

    Revised SDLC to include data architecture.

    Staffing strategy.

    Data Architecture engagement protocol.

    Installed modeling tool.

    2 Business Architecture and Domain Modeling

    The Purpose

    Identify the concepts and domains that will inform your data models.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Defined concepts for your data models.

    Activities

    2.1 Revisit business architecture output.

    2.2 Business domain selection.

    2.3 Identify business concepts.

    2.4 Organize and group of business concepts.

    2.5 Build the Business Data Glossary.

    Outputs

    List of defined and documented entities for the selected.

    Practice in the use of capability and business process models to identify key data concepts.

    Practice the domain modeling process of grouping and defining your bounded contexts.

    3 Harvesting Reference Models

    The Purpose

    Harvest reference models for your data architecture.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Reference models selected.

    Activities

    3.1 Reference model selection.

    3.2 Exploring and searching the reference model.

    3.3 Harvesting strategies and maintaining linkage.

    3.4 Extending the conceptual and logical models.

    Outputs

    Established and practiced steps to extend the conceptual or logical model from the reference model while maintaining lineage.

    4 Harvesting Existing Data Artifacts

    The Purpose

    Gather more information to create your data models.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Remaining steps and materials to build your data models.

    Activities

    4.1 Use your data inventory to select source models.

    4.2 Match semantics.

    4.3 Maintain lineage between BDG and existing sources.

    4.4 Select and harvest attributes.

    4.5 Define modeling standards.

    Outputs

    List of different methods to reverse engineer existing models.

    Practiced steps to extend the logical model from existing models.

    Report examples.

    5 Next Steps and Wrap-Up (offsite)

    The Purpose

    Wrap up the workshop and set your data models up for future success.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Understanding of functions and processes that will use the data models.

    Activities

    5.1 Institutionalize data architecture practices, standards, and procedures.

    5.2 Exploit and extend the use of the Conceptual model in the organization.

    Outputs

    Data governance policies, standards, and procedures for data architecture.

    List of business function and processes that will utilize the Conceptual model.

    Demystify Blockchain: How Can It Bring Value to Your Organization?

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}96|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Innovation
    • Parent Category Link: /innovation
    • Most leaders have an ambiguous understanding of blockchain and its benefits, let alone how it impacts their organization.
    • At the same time, with bitcoin drawing most of the media attention, organizations are finding it difficult to translate cryptocurrency usage to business case.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Cut through the hype associated with blockchain by focusing on what is relevant to your organization. You have been hearing about blockchain for some time now and want to better understand it. While it is complex, you can beat the learning curve by analyzing its key benefits and purpose. Features such as transparency, efficiency, and security differentiate blockchain from existing technologies and help explain why it has transformative potential.
    • Ensure your use case is actually useful by first determining whether blockchain aligns with your organization. CIOs must take a practical approach to blockchain in order to avoid wasting resources (both time and money) and hurting IT’s image in the eyes of the business. While is easy to get excited and invest in a new technology to help maintain your image as a thought leader, you must ensure that your use case is fully developed prior to doing so.

    Impact and Result

    • Follow Info-Tech’s methodology for simplifying an otherwise complex concept. By focusing on its benefits and how they directly relate to a use case, blockchain technology is made easy to understand for business and IT professionals.
    • Our program will help you understand if blockchain is the optimal solution for your organization by mapping its key benefits (i.e. transparency, integrity, efficiency, and security) to your needs and capabilities.
    • Leverage a repeatable framework for brainstorming blockchain use case ideas and communicate your findings to business stakeholders who may otherwise be confused about the transformative potential of blockchain.

    Demystify Blockchain: How Can It Bring Value to Your Organization? Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why your organization should care about determining whether blockchain aligns with your organization, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. What exactly is blockchain?

    Understand blockchain’s unique feature, benefits, and business use cases.

    • Demystify Blockchain – Phase 1: What Is Blockchain?
    • Blockchain Glossary

    2. What can blockchain do for your organization?

    Envision blockchain’s transformative potential for your organization by brainstorming and validating a use case.

    • Demystify Blockchain – Phase 2: What Can Blockchain Do for Your Organization?
    • Blockchain Alignment Tool
    • Blockchain Alignment Presentation
    [infographic]

    Modernize and Transform Your End-User Computing Strategy

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}308|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.6/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $34,982 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 25 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: End-User Computing Strategy
    • Parent Category Link: /end-user-computing-strategy

    IT needs to answer these questions:

    • What types of computing devices, provisioning models, and operating systems should be offered to end users?
    • How will IT support devices?
    • What are the policies and governance surrounding how devices are used?
    • What actions are we taking and when?
    • How do end-user devices support larger corporate priorities and strategies?

    Your answers need to balance choice, risk, and cost.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Even if a user has a prestigious tablet, if the apps aren’t built well, they can’t get support on it, or they can’t connect, then that device is useless. Focus on supportability, use cases, connection, and policy – and the device.

    Impact and Result

    • Identify desired benefits that align to IT and corporate priorities and strategies.
    • Perform a persona analysis.
    • Define a vision for end-user computing.
    • Define the standard device and app offerings.
    • Improve the supporting services surrounding devices.
    • Develop a roadmap for implementing your strategy.

    Modernize and Transform Your End-User Computing Strategy Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. End-User Computing Strategy Deck – A step-by-step document to walk you through end-user computing trends and processes to improve customer satisfaction.

    This storyboard will help you identify your goals, build standard offerings for users, define governance and policies around offerings, and develop a roadmap for your EUC program.

    • Modernize and Transform Your End-User Computing Strategy – Phases 1-3

    2. End-User Computing Strategy Template – A repository for your current-state and persona analysis to identify technology requirements for each user group.

    Use these templates to document your end-user computing strategy. Follow the guidelines in the blueprint and record activity results in the template. The findings will be presented to the management team.

    • End-User Computing Strategy Template
    • User Group Analysis Workbook

    3. End-User Computing Ideas Catalog and Standard Offering Guide – Templates that guide you to document the outcome from persona analysis to define standard offerings and policies.

    The Ideas Catalog introduces provisioning models, form factors, and supported operating systems. Use the Standard Offering Template to document provisioning models and define computing devices along with apps and peripherals according to the outcome of the user group analysis.

    • Standard End-User Entitlements and Offerings Template
    • End-User Computing Ideas Catalog

    4. End-User Computing Policies – Policies that establish requirements for end-user computing.

    Use these policy templates to communicate the purposes behind each end-user computing decision and establish company standards, guidelines, and procedures for the purchase of technologies. The policies will ensure purchasing, reimbursement, security, and remote wiping enforcements are consistent and in alignment with the company strategy.

    • Mobile Device Connectivity & Allowance Policy
    • Purchasing Policy
    • Mobile Device Reimbursement Agreement
    • Mobile Device Reimbursement Policy
    • BYOD Acceptable Use Policy
    • Mobile Device Remote Wipe Waiver Template
    • General Security – User Acceptable Use Policy
    • Device Entitlement Policy Template

    Infographic

    Workshop: Modernize and Transform Your End-User Computing Strategy

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Set the Direction

    The Purpose

    Dig into the current state and build user persona.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Determine your challenges and strengths.

    Delineate user IT requirements.

    Activities

    1.1 Assess the current state of end-user computing.

    1.2 Perform SWOT analysis.

    1.3 Map benefits to stakeholder drivers and priorities.

    1.4 Identify user groups.

    1.5 Identify supporting technology.

    1.6 Identify opportunities to provide value.

    Outputs

    SWOT analysis of current state

    Goals cascade

    Persona analysis

    2 Define the Offering

    The Purpose

    Define your EUC vision and standard offerings.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Brainstorm EUC vision and mission.

    Find out the standard offerings.

    Set the direction for end-user computing to support shift-left enablement.

    Activities

    2.1 Prioritize benefits.

    2.2 Craft a vision and mission statement.

    2.3 Identify goals.

    2.4 Define guiding principles for your strategy.

    2.5 Select a provisioning model for each persona.

    2.6 Define the standard device offerings.

    2.7 Document each persona's entitlements.

    Outputs

    Vision statement, mission statement, and guiding principles

    Goals and indicators

    End-user device entitlements standard

    3 Support the Offering

    The Purpose

    Outline supporting practices and define policies for each use case.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Document supporting practices.

    Document EUC policies.

    Activities

    3.1 Define device management tools and approach.

    3.2 Identify groups involved in supporting practices.

    3.3 Identify opportunities to improve customer service.

    3.4 Define acceptable use.

    3.5 Define BYOD policies.

    3.6 Define procurement and entitlement policies.

    3.7 Define security policies.

    Outputs

    List of management tools for end-user computing

    Roles and responsibilities for maintaining the end-user computing environment

    Opportunities to improve customer service

    End-user computing policy templates

    4 Bridge the Gap and Create the Roadmap

    The Purpose

    Build a user migration roadmap.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Make the project a reality by documenting initiatives and building a roadmap.

    Activities

    4.1 Identify the gaps in devices, user support, use cases, policy & governance, and fitness for use.

    4.2 Plan the deployment and user migration journey.

    4.3 Document initiatives in the roadmap.

    Outputs

    Initiatives mapped to practice areas

    User migration journey map

    Further reading

    Modernize and Transform Your End-User Computing Strategy

    Support the workforce of the future.

    EXECUTIVE BRIEF

    Analyst Perspective

    Focus beyond the device

    It’s easy to think that if we give end users nice devices, then they will be more engaged and they will be happy with IT. If only it were that easy.

    Info-Tech Research Group has surveyed over 119,000 people through its CIO Business Vision diagnostic. The results show that a good device is necessary but not enough for high satisfaction with IT. Once a user has a decent device, the other aspects of the user’s experience has a higher impact on their satisfaction with IT.

    After all, if a person is trying to run apps designed in the 1990s, if they are struggling to access resources through an underperforming VPN connection, or if they can’t get help when their devices and apps aren’t working, then it doesn’t matter that you gave them a state-of-the-art MacBook or Microsoft Surface.

    As you build out your end-user computing strategy to reflect the new reality of today’s workforce, ensure you focus on shifting user support left, modernizing apps to support how users need to work, and ensuring that your network and collaboration tools can support the increased demands. End-user computing teams need to focus beyond the device.

    Ken Weston, ITIL MP, PMP, Cert.APM, SMC

    Research Director, Infrastructure and Operations Info-Tech Research Group

    Mahmoud Ramin, PhD

    Senior Research Analyst, Infrastructure and Operations Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    IT needs to answer these questions:

    • What types of computing devices, provisioning models, and operating systems (OSes) should be offered to end users?
    • How will IT support devices?
    • What are the policies and governance surrounding how devices are used?
    • What actions are we taking and when?
    • How do end-user devices support larger corporate priorities and strategies?

    Your answers need to balance choice, risk, and cost.

    Common Obstacles

    Management paradigms have shifted:

    • OSes, device management, and IT asset management (ITAM) practices have changed.
    • Users expect full capabilities on any personal device.
    • Virtual desktops are switching to the cloud.
    • Low-code/no-code platforms allow the business to manage their own apps or comanage with IT.
    • Work-from-anywhere is the default.
    • Users have higher customer service expectations.

    Take end-user computing beyond the OS.

    Info-Tech's Approach

    This blueprint will help you:

    • Identify desired benefits that align to IT and corporate priorities and strategies.
    • Perform a persona analysis.
    • Define a vision for end-user computing.
    • Define the standard device and app offerings.
    • Improve the supporting services surrounding devices.
    • Develop a roadmap for implementing your strategy.

    A good device is necessary for satisfaction with IT but it’s not enough.

    If a user has a prestigious tablet but the apps aren’t built well, they can’t get support on it, or they can’t connect to the internet, then that device is useless. Focus on supportability, use cases, connection, policy – and device.

    Your challenge

    This blueprint will help you build a strategy that answers these questions:

    • What types of computing devices should be offered to end users?
    • What provisioning models will be used?
    • What operating systems are supported?
    • How will IT support devices?
    • What are the policies and governance surrounding how devices are used?
    • What actions are we taking and when?
    • How do end-user devices support larger corporate priorities and strategies?

    Definition: End-User Computing (EUC)

    End-user computing (EUC) is the domain of information and technology that deals with the devices used by workers to do their jobs. EUC has five focus areas: devices, user support, use cases, policy & governance, and fitness for use.

    A good end-user computing strategy will effectively balance:

    User Choice

    Cost

    Risk

    The right balance will be unique for every organization.

    Strike the right balance

    The discussion is larger than desktop support

    If IT is an influencer, then you get to drive this conversation. If IT is not an influencer, then you need to support whatever option the business wants.

    Cost Risk Choice Result
    Higher Education High importance Low importance High importance Full BYOD for professors. Standardized offerings for administration.
    Software Development Firms Low importance Medium/High importance High importance Standardized offerings for developers. Virtual desktops for users on BYOD.
    Legal Firm Medium importance High importance Low importance Partners offered prestigious devices. Everyone else uses Windows PCs. Virtual desktops and apps for remote access.

    Healthcare

    High importance High importance Low importance Nurses, janitors, and other frontline staff use shared tablets. Doctors are provisioned their own tablet. Admin staff and doctors are provisioned virtual desktops to maintain security and compliance.
    Government High importance High importance Low importance Standardized PC offerings for all employees. MacBooks are provided with justification. Devices managed with Intune and ConfigMgr.

    Good devices are necessary for overall IT satisfaction

    BUT

    Good devices are not enough for high satisfaction

    A bad device can ruin a person’s satisfaction with IT

    Info-Tech’s CIO Business Vision has shown that when someone is dissatisfied with their device, their satisfaction with IT overall is only 40.92% on average.

    When a person is satisfied with their device, their average satisfaction increases by approximately 30 percentage points to 70.22%. (Info-Tech Research Group, CIO Business Vision, 2021; N=119,383)

    The image is a bar graph, with the Y-axis labelled Overall IT Satisfaction. There are two bars, one labelled Satisfied With Devices, which is at 70.22%, and the other labelled Dissatisfied With Devices, which is at 40.92%.

    Improvements in the service desk, business apps, networks and communication infrastructure, and IT policy all have a higher impact on increasing satisfaction.

    For every one-point increase in satisfaction in those areas, respondents’ overall satisfaction with IT increased by the respective percentage of a point. (Info-Tech Research Group, CIO Business Vision, 2021; N=119,409)

    The image shows a graphic of five arrows pointing upwards. They are labelled (from right to left): Devices--42.20%; IT Policy--45.90%; Network & Comms Infra--59.49%; Business Apps--63.89%; Service Desk--65.19%, 1.54 times the impact of devices.

    End-User Paradigms Have Shifted

    Take end-user computing beyond the device

    Operating System - OS

    Only Windows

    • More choices than ever before

    Endpoint Management System - UEM

    Group Policy & Client Management

    • Modern & Unified Endpoint Management

    Personal Devices - BYOD

    Limited to email on phones

    • Full capabilities on any device

    IT Asset Management - ITAM

    Hands-on with images

    • Zero-touch with provisioning packages

    Virtual Desktops - DaaS

    Virtual Desktop Infrastructure in the Data Center

    • Desktop-as-a-Service in the cloud

    Business-Managed Apps - BMA

    Performed by IT

    • Performed by the Business and IT

    Work-From-Anywhere - WFA

    Rare

    • Default

    Customer Satisfaction - C Sat

    Phone calls and transactional interactions

    • Self-serve & managing entire experience

    Don’t limit your focus to only Windows and Macs

    Android is the OS with the largest market share

    Users and IT have more choices than ever before

    Operating System - OS

    Only Windows

    • More choices than ever before

    Microsoft is still the dominant player in end-user computing, but Windows has only a fraction of the share it once had.

    IT needs to revisit their device management practices. Modern management tools such as unified endpoint management (UEM) tools are better suited than traditional client management tools (CMT) for a cross-platform world.

    IT must also revisit their application portfolios. Are business apps supported on Android and iOS or are they only supported on Windows? Is there an opportunity to offer more options to end users? Are end users already running apps and handling sensitive data on Android and iOS through software-as-a-service and bring-your-own-device (BYOD) capabilities in Office 365 and Google apps?

    The image shows a bar graph titled OS Market Share, 2011-2021. On the x-axis are OS names with a bar in blue representing their market share in 2011, and a bar in purple showing their market share in 2021. The data shown is as follows: Windows--85.98% (2011), 31.62% (2021); Android--1.22% (2011), 40.85% (2021); iOS--2.1% (2011), 16.42% (2021); Mac OS X--6.19% (2011); 6.8% (2021); Other--4.51% (2011), 4.31% (2021). Source: StatCounter Global Stats.

    OS market share is partly driven by the digital divide

    If someone must choose between a smartphone and a computer, they go with a smartphone

    IT can’t expect everyone to be fluent on Windows and Mac, have a computer at home, or even have home broadband.

    Of US adults aged 18-29:

    • 96% have a smartphone (the rest have cellphones).
    • Only 70% of US adults aged 18-29 have a home broadband connection.

    Further, only 59% of US adults making less than $30,000/year have a laptop or desktop. (“Mobile Technology” and “Digital Divide,” Pew Research, 2021.)

    Globally, people are likelier to have a cell subscription than they are to have access to broadband.

    The image is a bar graph, with a list of countries on the X-axis, with each having two bars: blue indicating Fixed Broadband Subscriptions per 100 people and purple indicating Mobile Cellular Subscriptions per 100 people. In all listed countries, the number of Mobile Cellular Subscriptions per 100 people is higher than Fixed Broadband Subscriptions. Source: The World Bank, 2020. Most recent data for USA mobile cellular subscriptions is from 2019.

    Embrace new device management paradigms

    Endpoint Management System - UEM

    Group Policy & Client Management

    • Modern & Unified Endpoint Management

    Evaluate enterprise mobility management and unified endpoint management to better support a remote-first, cross-platform reality.

    Client Management Tool (CMT)

    CMTs such as Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (ConfigMgr, aka SCCM) can be used to distribute apps, apply patches, and enforce group policy.

    Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM)

    EMM tools allow you to manage multiple device platforms through mobile device management (MDM) protocols. These tools enforce security settings, allow you to push apps to managed devices, and monitor patch compliance through reporting.

    EMM tools often support mobile application management (MAM) and mobile content management (MCM). Most EMM tools can manage devices running Windows, Mac OS, iOS, and Android, although there are exceptions.

    Unified Endpoint Management (UEM)

    UEM solutions combine CMT and EMM for better control of remote computers running Windows or Macs. Examples include:

    • Windows devices comanaged by Intune and ConfigMgr.
    • Mac devices managed by Jamf Pro.
    • Mac devices comanaged by Jamf Pro and Intune.

    Most UEM tools can manage devices running Windows, Mac OS, iOS, and Android, allowing IT to manage all end-user devices from a unified tool set (although there are exceptions).

    Mobile Application Management (MAM)

    MAM provides the ability to package an app with security settings, distribute app updates, and enforce app updates. Some capabilities do not require apps to be enrolled in an EMM or UEM solution.

    Mobile Content Management (MCM)

    MCM tools distribute files to remote devices. Many MCM solutions allow for security settings to be applied, such as encrypting the files or prohibiting data from leaving the secure container. Examples include OneDrive, Box, and Citrix ShareFile.

    Adopt modern management with EMM and UEM – better toolsets for today’s state of EUC

    Sacrifice your Group Policy Objects to better manage Windows computers

    Windows Management Features Traditional CMT Hybrid UEM Cloud-Based EMM
    Group Policy ✔ Primary management approach ✔ Available alongside configuration service providers X Replaced by configuration service providers
    Manage remote devices without VPN X X
    No longer manage and maintain images X ✔ Images are still available ✔ Images replaced by provisioning packages
    Secure and support BYOD X (Certain tools may offer limited MDM capabilities)
    Support remote zero-touch provisioning X (Only available via PXE boot)
    App, patch, update deployments Via defined distribution points Via defined distribution points or MAM Via MAM

    IT asset management practices are shifting

    IT Asset Management - ITAM

    Hands-on with images

    • Zero-touch with provisioning packages

    Supply chain issues are making computers longer to procure, meaning users are waiting longer for computers (Cision, 2021). The resulting silicon chip shortage is expected to last until at least 2023 (Light Reading, 2021).

    IT departments are delaying purchases, delaying refreshes, and/or purchasing more to reserve devices before they need them.

    Remote work has increased by 159% over the past 12 years (NorthOne, 2021). New hires and existing users can’t always go into the office to get a new computer.

    IT departments are paying vendors to hold onto computers and then drop-ship them directly to the end user. The devices are provisioned using zero touch (e.g. Autopilot, Apple Device Manager, or another tool). Since zero-touch provisioning tools do not support images, teams have had to switch to provisioning packages.

    The pandemic saw an increase in spending on virtual desktops

    Virtual desktops offered powerful tools for supporting remote devices and personal computers without compromising sensitive data

    Virtual Desktops - DaaS

    Virtual Desktop Infrastructure in the Data Center

    • Desktop-as-a-Service in the cloud

    The pandemic helped cloud-based virtual desktop infrastructure (VDI)

    Citrix saw subscription revenue increase 71% year over year in 2020 (Citrix 2020 Annual Report, p. 4). VMware saw subscription and SaaS revenue increase 38% from January 2020 to 2021 – while on-premises licensing revenue decreased by 5% (VMware Annual Report 2021, p. 40).

    IT no longer needs to manage the underlying infrastructure

    Microsoft and AWS are offering desktops as a service (i.e. cloud-based virtual desktops). IT needs to manage only the device, not the underlying virtual desktop infrastructure. This is in addition to Citrix’s and VMware’s cloud offerings, where IT doesn’t need to manage the underlying infrastructure that supports VDI.

    Visit the blueprint Implement Desktop Virtualization and Transition to Everything as a Service to get started.

    Work-from-anywhere (WFA) is now the default

    COVID-19 forced this shift

    Work-From-Anywhere - WFA

    Rare

    • Default

    Be prepared to support a hybrid workforce, where people are sometimes working remotely and sometimes working in the office.

    • Device provisioning and deployment need to be rethought. In-person deployment is not always possible. IT should evaluate tools such as zero-touch provisioning.
    • Service desks need better monitoring and management tools. End-user experience management (EUEM) can allow you to better identify where network issues are occurring – in your data center, at the user’s house, in the cloud, or somewhere in between. Remote control tools can then allow your tier 1 to remediate issues on the user’s device.
    • Apps and devices need to be usable from anywhere. Environments that rely on desktops and on-premises apps need to be rearchitected for a remote-first workforce.
    • Users are living inside video conferencing tools. With the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, there are about 145 million daily users of Microsoft Teams, almost twice the number of users in 2020 (MUO, 2021). Ensure they have the training and expertise to effectively use these tools.

    “More technical troubleshooting due to users working from home a lot more. It can be more difficult to talk users through fixes when they are off site if you cannot remotely assist so more emphasis on the communication skill which was already important.” (Service Desk Institute, 2021)

    Visit the Hybrid Workplace Research Center to better support a hybrid workforce.

    BYOD fully includes personal computers

    It’s no longer about whether IT will allow BYOD

    Stop pretending BYOD doesn’t happen

    Personal Devices - BYOD

    Limited to email on phones

    • Full capabilities on any device
    • BYOD (including BYOPC) is turned on by default. SaaS tools like Office 365 are built to be used on multiple devices, including multiple computers. Further, the pandemic saw 47% of organizations significantly increase their use of BYOD (Cybersecurity Insiders, 2021; N=271).
    • BYOD can boost productivity. When employees can use smartphones for work, they report that it increases their productivity by 34 percent (Samsung Insights, 2016).
    • BYOD is hard to support, so most organizations don’t. Only 22% of organizations provide full support for mobile devices, while 20% provide no support, 25% provide ad hoc support, and 26% provide limited support (Cybersecurity Insiders, 2021). If smartphones and tablets are heavily ingrained in business processes, then migrating to BYOD can overload the service desk.
    • Securely enable employees. Mobile application management (MAM), mobile content management (MCM), and Office 365 have gotten smarter at protecting corporate data.

    Action Item: Identify how IT can provide more support to personally owned computers, tablets, and smartphones.

    58% of working Americans say their work devices are “awful to work on." (PCMag, 2021)

    But only 22% of organizations provide full support to BYOD. (Cybersecurity Insiders, 2021)

    IT must either provide better devices or start fully supporting users on personal PCs.

    Build governance practices for low-code development platforms

    Managing 1,000 different apps built out on low-code business process management platforms is hard, but it’s not nearly as hard as managing 1,000 unique SaaS apps or access databases

    Business-Managed Apps - BMA

    Performed by IT

    • Performed by the Business and IT

    Pros - Opportunities

    • Offers DIY to users
    • Business can build them quickly
    • IT has central visibility
    • IT can focus on the platform

    Cons - Threats

    • Sensitive data can get exposed
    • Users may have issues with continuity and backup
    • Responding to platform changes will be potentially challenging
    • Support may be difficult after the app creator leaves

    Action Item: Build a governance framework that describes the roles and responsibilities involved in business-owned apps. Identify the user’s role and end-user computing’s role in supporting low-code apps.

    Visit the blueprint Embrace Business-Managed Apps to learn how to build a governance framework for low-code development platforms.

    Visit the Low-Code Business Process Management SoftwareReviews category to compare different platforms.

    Update your customer service practices

    End users expect self-service and help from tier 1

    Re-evaluate how you support both corporate-issued and personal-owned computers and mobile devices

    Customer Satisfaction - C Sat

    Phone calls and transactional interactions

    • Self-serve & managing entire experience

    Microsoft’s 2019 “Global State of Customer Service” report shows that people have high expectations:

    • 31% of people expect call agents to have a “deep understanding of the caller’s relationship with the company”
    • 11% expect self-service capabilities

    End users have the same expectations of IT, the service desk, and end-user computing teams:

    • Users expect any IT person with whom they are talking to have a deep understanding of their devices, apps, open tickets, and closed tickets.
    • Users expect tier 1 to be able to resolve their incidents and requests without escalating to tier 2 or tier 3 end-user computing specialists.

    Most Important Aspects of Customer Service

    Resolving issue in one interaction - 35%

    Knowledgeable agent - 31%

    Finding information myself - 11%

    Not repeating information - 20%

    (Microsoft, 2019)

    Desktop engineering needs to shift left

    Revisit what work can only be done by tier 2 and tier 3 teams

    Shifting left involves shifting resolution of incidents and service requests down from more costly resources to the first line of support and to end users themselves through self-service options

    • Tier 1 needs up-to-date information on the end users’ devices and open tickets.
    • Users should be able to request apps and download those apps through a self-service portal, a software catalog, or an app store.
    • Tier 1 needs to be empowered to remote wipe devices, see troubleshooting and diagnostics information, and resolve incidents without needing to escalate.

    Action Item: Apply shift-left enablement to train tier 1 agents on troubleshooting more incidents and fulfilling more service requests. Build top-notch self-service capabilities for end users.

    The image is a graphic titled Shift-Left Strategy. At the top, it lists Auto-Fix; User, Tier 1, Tier 2/3, and Vendor. On the left, it lists Metrics vertically: Cost, Time, Satisfaction. A bar displays how high or low the metric is based on the categories listed at the top.

    Work with your service desk on the blueprint Optimize the Service Desk with a Shift-Left Strategy.

    Windows 11 is coming

    Prepare to make the jump

    The sooner you start, the easier the migration will be

    • Begin planning hardware refreshes. Old computers that do not have a TPM 2.0 chip are not currently supported on Windows 11 (“Enable TPM 2.0,” Microsoft, 2021). If you have old computers that will not support the jump to Windows 11– especially given the supply chain disruptions and silicon chip shortages – it is time to consider computer upgrades.
    • The end of Windows 10 is coming. Windows 10’s retirement date is currently October 14, 2025 (“Windows 10 Home and Pro,” Microsoft, 2021). If you want to continue running Windows 10 on older computers beyond that time, you will need to pay for extended support or risk those computers being more easily breached.
    • Begin testing your apps internally. Run Windows 11 within IT and test whether your apps will work on Windows 11.
    • Pilot Windows 11 with IT-friendlies. Find users that are excited for Windows 11 and will not mind a bit of short-term pain.
    • What is your risk appetite? Risk-averse organizations will want to wait until Microsoft, DISA, and/or Center for Internet Security have published security configuration best practices.

    Info-Tech’s approach

    Master the ever-expanding puzzle of end-user computing

    User Group Analysis

    Supported Devices and Apps

    Fitness for Use

    Device Support

    The Info-Tech difference:

    1. Balance user choice, risk mitigation, and cost optimization. The right balance will be unique for every organization.
    2. Standardize the nonstandard. Anticipate your users’ needs by having power options and prestigious options ready to offer.
    3. Consider multiple personas when building your standards, training, and migrations. Early Adopters, Late Adopters, VIP Users, Road Warriors, and Hoarders – these five personas will exist in one form or another throughout your user groups.

    Modernize and Transform Your End-User Computing Strategy

    Focus on the Big Picture

    End-User Paradigms Have Shifted

    Take end-user computing beyond the device

    Operating System - OS

    Only Windows

    • More choices than ever before

    Endpoint Management System - UEM

    Group Policy & Client Management

    • Modern & Unified Endpoint Management

    Personal Devices - BYOD

    Limited to email on phones

    • Full capabilities on any device

    IT Asset Management - ITAM

    Hands-on with images

    • Zero-touch with provisioning packages

    Virtual Desktops - DaaS

    Virtual Desktop Infrastructure in the Data Center

    • Desktop-as-a-Service in the cloud

    Business-Managed Apps - BMA

    Performed by IT

    • Performed by the Business and IT

    Work-From-Anywhere - WFA

    Rare

    • Default

    Customer Satisfaction - C Sat

    Phone calls and transactional interactions

    • Self-serve & managing entire experience

    Don't just focus on the device!

    Improvements in the service desk, business apps, networks and communication infrastructure, and IT policy have a higher impact on increasing satisfaction.

    Impact of End-User Satisfaction of IT by Area Compared to Devices

    Devices (x1.0)

    IT Policy (x1.09)

    Network & Communications Infrastructure (x1.41)

    Business Apps (x1.51)

    Service Desk (x1.54)

    (Info-Tech Research Group, CIO Business Vision, 2021; n=119,409)

    Build your strategy with these components...

    End-User Group Analysis

    • Work location
    • Information interactions
    • Apps
    • Data and files
    • Business capabilities
    • Current offering
    • Pain points
    • Desired gains

    Supported Devices & Apps

    • Primary computing device offerings
    • Power computing device offering
    • Prestigious device offerings
    • Secondary computing device offerings
    • Provisioning models
    • Standard apps
    • Peripherals

    Device Support

    • Self-service
    • Service Desk
    • Specialists

    Fitness for Use

    • Organizational policies
    • Security policies

    Vision

    ...to answer these questions:

    1. What devices will people have?
    2. How will you support these devices?
    3. How will you govern these devices?

    Balance choice, risk, and cost

    The right balance will be unique for every organization. Get the balance right by aligning your strategy's goals to senior leadership’s most important priorities.

    • User choice
    • Risk
    • Cost

    + Standardize the non-standard

    Have a more prestigious option ready for users, such as VIPs, who want more than the usual offerings. This approach will help you to proactively anticipate your users' needs.

    +Consider multiple personas when building your standards, training, and migrations

    These five personas will exist in one form or another throughout your user groups.

    • Early Adopters
    • Late Adopters
    • VIP Users
    • Road Warriors
    • Hoarders

    Use our approach to answer these questions:

    What computers will people have?

    Types of computing devices

    • Power desktop
    • Power laptop
    • Desktop
    • Laptop
    • Virtual Desktop
    • Thin Client Device
    • Pro Tablet
    • Tablet
    • Smartphone

    Corporate-Issued Approaches

    • Kiosk – Shared, Single Purpose
    • Pooled – Shared, Multipurpose
    • Persistent – Individual
    • Personally Owned

    Supported Operating Systems

    • Windows
    • Mac
    • Chrome OS
    • Linux
    • iOS/iPad OS
    • Android

    How will you support these devices?

    Device Management

    • Manual
    • CMT
    • EMM
    • UEM
    • Pooled Virtual Desktop Manager

    Supporting Practices

    • Self-Service
    • Tier 1 Support
    • Specialist Support

    How will you govern these devices?

    Corporate Policies

    • Personal Use Allowed?
    • Management and Security Policies
    • Personal Device Use Allowed?
    • Supported Apps and Use Cases
    • Who Is Allowed to Purchase?
    • Prohibited Apps and Use Cases
    • Device Entitlement
    • Stipends and/or Reimbursement to Users

    Use our blueprint to improve your EUC practices

    1. Devices
      • Corporate-issued devices
      • Standard offerings
    2. User Support
      • Self-service
      • Tier 1 support
    3. Use Cases
      • Providing value
      • Business apps
    4. Policy & Governance
      • Personal device use
      • IT policy
    5. Fitness for Use
      • Securing devices
      • Patching

    Info-Tech’s methodology for end-user computing strategy

    1. Set the Direction 2. Define the Offering 3. Build the Roadmap
    Phase Steps

    1.1 Identify Desired Benefits

    1.2 Perform a User Group Analysis

    1.3 Define the Vision

    2.1 Define the Standard Offerings

    2.2 Outline Supporting Services

    2.3 Define Governance and Policies

    3.1 Develop Initiatives
    Phase Outcomes

    Current-State Assessment

    Goals Cascade

    User Group Assessment

    Vision Statement

    Mission Statement

    Guiding Principles

    Standard Offerings by User Group

    Device Management Model

    Technical Support Model

    Device Entitlement Policy

    Acceptable Use Policy

    Remote Wipe Policy & Waiver

    Personal Device Reimbursement Policy

    End-User Migration Journey Map

    Strategy and Roadmap

    Insight summary

    Once users are satisfied with devices, focus on the bigger picture

    If end users are dissatisfied with devices, they will also be dissatisfied with IT. But if you don’t also focus on apps and supportability, then giving users better devices will only marginally increase satisfaction with IT.

    Bring it back to stakeholder priorities

    Before you build your vision statement, make sure it resonates with the business by identifying senior leadership’s priorities and aligning your own goals to them.

    Balance choice, risk, and cost

    The balance of user choice, risk mitigation, and cost optimization is unique for each company. Get the balance right by aligning your strategy’s goals to senior leadership’s most important priorities.

    Communicate early and often with users

    Expect users to become anxious when you start targeting their devices. Address this anxiety by bringing them into the conversation early in the planning – they will see that their concerns are being addressed and may even feel a sense of ownership over the strategy.

    Standardize the nonstandard

    When users such as VIP users want more than the standard offering, have a more prestigious option available. This approach will help you to proactively anticipate your users’ needs.

    Consider multiple personas when building your standards, training, and migrations

    Early Adopters, Late Adopters, VIP Users, Road Warriors, and Hoarders – these five personas will exist in one form or another throughout your user groups.

    Blueprint deliverables

    Each step of this blueprint is accompanied by supporting deliverables to help you accomplish your goals:

    User Group Analysis Workbook

    Use these worksheets to guide your analysis.

    End-User Computing Ideas Catalog

    Compare options for your end-user computing environment.

    Standard End-User Entitlements and Offerings

    Define your supported offerings and publish this document in your service catalog.

    Policy Templates

    Use these templates as a starting point for addressing policy gaps.

    Key deliverable:

    End-User Computing Strategy

    Document your strategy using this boardroom-ready template.

    Blueprint benefits

    IT Benefits

    • Deliver immediate value to end users.
    • Provide the best service based on the user persona.
    • Provide better device coverage.
    • Use fewer tools to manage a less diverse but equally effective array of end-user computing devices.
    • Provide more managed devices that will help to limit risk.
    • Have better visibility into the end-user computing devices and apps.

    Business Benefits

    • Conduct corporate business under one broad strategy.
    • Provide support to IT for specific applications and devices.
    • Take advantage of more scalable economies for providing more advantageous technologies.
    • Experience less friction between end users and the business and higher end-user satisfaction.

    Measure the value of this blueprint

    Your end-user computing strategy is an investment

    Track the returns on your investment, even if those returns are soft benefits and not cost reductions

    User Satisfaction

    • Satisfaction with device
    • Satisfaction with business apps
    • Satisfaction with service desk timeliness
    • Satisfaction with service desk effectiveness
    • Satisfaction with IT Employee engagement

    Total Cost

    • Spend on each type of device
    • Cost of licenses for management tools, operating systems, and apps
    • Cost of support agreements # of support tickets per device per employee
    • Time spent supporting devices per tier or support team
    • Time spent per OS/app release

    Risk Mitigation

    • # of devices that are end-of-life
    • % of devices in compliance
    • # of unmanaged devices
    • # of devices that have not checked in to management tool

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    "Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful."

    Guided Implementation

    "Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track."

    Workshop

    "We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place."

    Consulting

    "Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project."

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks are used throughout all four options.

    Guided Implementation

    What does a typical GI on this topic look like?

    A Guided Implementation (GI) is a series of calls with an Info-Tech analyst to help implement our best practices in your organization.

    A typical GI is 8 to 10 calls over the course of 4 to 6 months.

    Phase 1: Set the Direction

    • Call #1: Review trends in end-user computing and discuss your current state.
    • Call #2: Perform a user group analysis.
    • Call #3: Identify desired benefits and map to stakeholder drivers.

    Phase 2: Define the Offering

    • Call #4: Define standard offerings.
    • Call #5: Select provisioning models.
    • Call #6: Outline supporting services and opportunities to shift end-user computing support left.
    • Call #7: Identify gaps in governance and policies.

    Phase 3: Build the Roadmap

    • Call #8: Develop initiatives.
    • Call #9: Plan migration and build roadmap.

    EUC Strategy Workshop Overview

    Contact your account representative for more information.

    workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8889

    Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5
    Set the Direction Define the Offering Support the Offering Bridge the Gap and Create the Roadmap Next Steps and Wrap-Up (offsite)
    Activities

    1.1 Identify desired benefits.

    1.1.1 Assess the current state of end-user computing.

    1.1.2 Perform a SWOT analysis.

    1.1.3 Map benefits to stakeholder drivers and priorities.

    1.2 Analyze user groups.

    1.2.1 Identify user groups.

    1.2.2 Identify supporting technology.

    1.2.3 Record use cases.

    1.2.4 Identify opportunities to provide value.

    1.3 Define the vision.

    1.3.1 Prioritize benefits.

    1.3.2 Craft a vision and mission statement.

    1.3.3 Identify goals.

    1.3.4 Define guiding principles for your strategy.

    2.1 Define the standard offerings.

    2.1.1 Select a provisioning model for each persona.

    2.1.2 Define the standard device offerings.

    2.1.3 Document each personas’ entitlements.

    2.2 Outline supporting practices.

    2.2.1 Define device management tools and approach.

    2.2.2 Identify groups involved in supporting practices.

    2.2.4 Identify opportunities to improve customer service.

    2.3 Define policies. 2.3.1 Define acceptable use. 2.3.2 Define BYOD policies. 2.3.3 Define procurement and entitlement policies. 2.3.4 Define security policies.

    3.1 Develop initiatives.

    3.1.1 Identify the gaps in devices, user support, use cases, policy & governance, and fitness for use.

    3.1.2 Plan the deployment and user migration journey.

    3.1.3 Document initiatives in the roadmap .

    5.1 Complete in-progress deliverables from previous four days.

    5.2 Set up time to review workshop deliverables and discuss next steps

    Deliverables
    1. SWOT analysis of current state
    2. Goals cascade
    3. Persona analysis
    1. Vision statement, mission statement, and guiding principles
    2. Goals and indicators
    3. End-user device entitlements standard
    1. List of management tools for end-user computing
    2. Roles and responsibilities for maintaining the end-user computing environment
    3. Opportunities to improve customer service
    4. End-user computing policy templates
    1. Initiatives mapped to practice areas
    2. User’s migration journey map
    1. End-user computing strategy template
    2. End-user computing roadmap

    Phase 1

    Set the Direction

    Set the Direction

    1.1 Identify Desired Benefits

    1.2 Perform a User Group Analysis

    1.3 Define the Vision

    Define the Offering

    2.1 Define the Standard Offerings

    2.2 Outline Supporting Services

    2.3 Define Governance and Policies

    Build the Roadmap

    3.1 Develop Initiatives

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Current-state analysis
    • Goals cascade
    • Persona analysis

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • End-User Computing Team
    • IT Leadership

    Set a direction that will create value for IT, stakeholders, and end users

    Use your insights to build your strategy

    Start by downloading Info-Tech’s End-User Computing Strategy Template

    1. Perform a stop-start-continue exercise for how IT supports end-user devices.
    2. Perform a goals cascade to identify how the end-user computing strategy can align with and support senior leaders’ priorities and strategic objectives.
    3. Perform a user group analysis to identify what IT can do to provide additional value to end users.
    4. Use the results to define a vision for your end-user computing strategy and in-scope benefits.

    Download the End-User Computing Strategy Template.

    Step 1.1

    Identify Desired Benefits

    Activities

    1.1.1 Assess the current state of end-user computing

    1.1.2 Perform a SWOT analysis

    1.1.3 Map benefits to stakeholder drivers and priorities

    Optional: Identify current total cost of ownership

    This step requires the following inputs:

    • Current approach for end-user computing
    • List of strengths and weaknesses of the current approach

    This step involves the following participants:

    • CIO
    • End-User Computing Team
    • IT Leadership
    • End-User Computing Manager

    Outcomes of this step

    • Defined success metrics that are tied to business value
    • Vision statement, mission statement, and guiding principles

    Review your current state for each end-user computing practice

    1. Devices
      • Corporate-issued devices
      • Standard offerings
    2. User Support
      • Self-service
      • Tier 1 support
    3. Use Cases
      • Providing value
      • Business apps
    4. Policy & Governance
      • Personal device use
      • IT policy
    5. Fitness for Use
      • Securing devices
      • Patching

    1.1.1 Assess the current state of end-user computing

    Discuss IT’s strengths and challenges

    Review your success in responding to the trends highlighted in the executive brief.

    • Start by reviewing the trends in the executive brief. Identify which trends you would like to focus on.
    • Review the domains below. Discuss:
      • Your current approach
      • Strengths about this approach
      • Challenges faced with this approach
    • Document the results in the “Current-State Assessment” section of your End-User Computing Strategy.
    1. Devices
      • Corporate-issued devices
      • Standard offerings
    2. User Support
      • Self-service
      • Tier 1 support
    3. Use Cases
      • Providing value
      • Business apps
    4. Policy & Governance
      • Personal device use
      • IT policy
    5. Fitness for Use
      • Securing devices
      • Patching

    Download the End-User Computing Strategy Template.

    Consider these aspects of end-user computing in your assessment

    Devices: As shown in the executive brief, devices are necessary for satisfaction in IT. In your current-state assessment, outline the principal means by which users are provided with a desktop and computing.

    • Corporate-issued devices: Document the types of devices (e.g. laptops, desktops, smartphones) and operating systems that IT currently supports.
      • Strengths: Highlight user satisfaction with your current offerings by referencing recent relationship surveys.
      • Challenges: Document corporate-issued devices where stakeholders and users are not satisfied, platforms that stakeholders would like IT to support, etc.
    • Standard offerings: Name the high-level categories of devices that you offer to end users (e.g. standard device, power device).
      • Strengths: Outline steps that IT has taken to improve the portfolio of standard offerings and to communicate the offerings.
      • Challenges: Identify areas to improve the standard offerings.

    User support: Examine how the end-user computing team enables a high-quality customer service experience. Especially consider self-service and tier 1 support.

    • Self-service: Describe the current state of your self-service capabilities (e.g. name of the self-service portal, number of apps in the app store).
      • Strengths: Outline successes with your self-service capabilities (e.g. use of self-service tools, recently deployed tools, newly supported platforms).
      • Challenges: Identify gaps in self-service capabilities.
    • Tier 1 support: Document the number of end-user computing incidents and service requests that are resolved at tier 1 as well as the number of incidents and service requests that are resolvable without escalation.
      • Strengths: Identify technologies that make first contact resolution possible. Outline other items that support tier 1 resolution of end-user computing tickets, such as knowledgebase articles and training programs.
      • Challenges: Document areas in which tier 1 resolution of end-user computing tickets is not feasible.

    Considerations (cont’d.)

    Use cases: Reflect on how IT and end-user computing supports users’ most important use cases. Consider these aspects:

    • Providing value: Identify the number of user groups for which you have completed a user group analysis. Outline your major approaches for capturing feedback, such as relationship surveys.
      • Strengths: Document any successful initiatives around stakeholder relationships and requirements gathering. You can also highlight successful metrics, such as high satisfaction scores from a team, department, or division.
      • Challenges: Identify where there are dissatisfied stakeholders and gaps in product offerings and where additional work around value generation is required.
    • Business apps: Outline your major business apps and your approach to improvement for these apps. If you need assistance gathering feedback from end users and stakeholders, you can use Info-Tech’s Application Portfolio Assessment.
      • Strengths: Show the EUC team’s successes in supporting critical business apps (e.g. facilitating user acceptance testing, deploying via endpoint management tool).
      • Challenges: Name business apps that are not meeting stakeholder needs. Consider if end users are dissatisfied with an app, if IT is unable to adequately monitor and support a business app, etc.

    Policy and governance: Document the current state of policies governing the use of end-user computing devices, both corporate-issued and personally owned. Review Step 2.3 for a list of policy questions to address and for links to policy templates.

    • Personal device use: Explain which users are allowed to use personally owned devices, what use cases are supported, and which types of devices are supported. Also, highlight explicit prohibitions.
      • Strengths: Highlight major accomplishments with BYOD, utilization metrics, etc. Consider including any platforms or apps that support BYOD (e.g. Microsoft Office 365).
      • Challenges: Identify where there are gaps in your support for personal devices. Examples can include insufficient management tools, lack of feedback from end users on BYOD support, undefined policies and governance, and inadequate support for personal devices.

    Considerations (cont’d.)

    IT policies: List your current policy documents. Include policies that relate to end-user computing, such as security policy documents; acceptable use policy documents; purchasing policies; documents governing entitlements to computers, tablets, smartphones, and prestigious devices; and employee monitoring policy documents.

    • Strengths: Outline the effectiveness of these policies, user compliance to these policies, and your success in enforcing these policies.
    • Challenges: Identify where you have gaps in user compliance, gaps in enforcing policies, many exceptions to a policy, etc.

    Fitness for use: Reflect on your ability to secure users, enterprise data, and computers. Document your current capabilities to ensure devices are adequately secured and risks adequately mitigated.

    • Securing devices: Describe your current approach to implementing security baselines, protecting data, and ensuring compliance.
      • Strengths: Highlight your accomplishments with ensuring devices meet your security standards and are adequately managed.
      • Challenges: Identify areas that are not adequately protected, where IT does not have enough visibility, and devices on which IT cannot enforce security standards.
    • Patching: Describe your current approach to distributing OS patches, distributing app patches, and ensuring patch compliance.
      • Strengths: Outline steps that IT has taken to improve release and deployment practices (e.g. user acceptance testing, deployment rings).
      • Challenges: When is IT unable to push a patch to a device? Outline when devices cannot receive a patch, when IT is unable to ensure patches are installed, and when patches are disruptive to end users.

    1.1.2 Perform a SWOT analysis

    Summarize your current-state analysis

    To build a good strategy, you need to clearly understand the challenges you face and opportunities you can leverage.

    • Summarize IT’s strengths. These are positive aspects internal to IT.
    • Summarize IT’s challenge. What internal IT weakness should the strategy address?
    • Identify high-level opportunities. Summarize positive factors that are external to IT (e.g. within the larger organization, strong vendor relationships).
    • Document threats. What external factors present a risk to the strategy?

    Record your SWOT analysis in the “Current-State Assessment” section of your End-User Computing Strategy Template.

    Download the End-User Computing Strategy Template.

    1.1.3 Map benefits to stakeholder drivers and priorities

    Use a goals cascade to identify benefits that will resonate with the business

    Identify how end-user computing will support larger organizational strategies, drivers, and priorities

    1. Identify stakeholders. Focus on senior leaders – user groups will be addressed in Step 1.2.
    2. For each stakeholder, identify three to five drivers or strategic priorities. Use the drivers as a starting point to:
      1. Increase productivity
      2. Mitigate risks
      3. Optimize costs
    3. Map the benefits you brainstormed in Step 1.1 to the drivers. It’s okay to have benefits map to multiple drivers.
    4. Re-evaluate benefits that don’t map to any drivers. Consider removing them.
    Stakeholder Drivers and Strategic Priorities End-User Computing Benefits
    CEO Ensure service continuity with remote work
    • Customers can still be served by remote workers
    Respond to COVID-19 changes with agility
    • Workers can transition seamlessly between working remotely and working in the office
    Reduce unnecessary costs
    • Standardize computer models to reduce spend on devices
    COO Business continuity: being able to work from home
    • Workers can transition seamlessly between working remotely and working in the office

    Record this table on the “Goals Cascade” slide in the “Vision and Desired Benefits” section of your End-User Computing Strategy Template.

    Use the CEO-CIO Alignment Program to identify which business benefits are most important.

    Sample end-user computing benefits

    Business Goals End-User Computing Benefits
    Manage risk Controls are effectively enforced on remote devices Sensitive data is secured Devices and data are accounted for
    Ensure service continuity Business processes can still function with remote personnel Customers can still be served by remote workers Personnel can be productive from anywhere IT practices can still operate remotely
    Comply with external regulation Improved ability to demonstrate compliance
    Respond to change with agility Personnel can be productive from anywhere More business processes can be performed remotely
    Improve operational efficiency More efficient sales practices More efficient customer service practices Increased number of digitized business processes Increased use of IT and HR self-service tools
    Offer competitive products and services Increased customer satisfaction with online services Number of piloted new products
    Manage people Increased employee productivity Increased employee engagement Increased talent attraction Increased workforce retention
    Make data-driven decisions Increased workforce retention Improved understanding of customers Access to accurate data on services and spending Improved IT cost forecasting
    Improve customer experience Increased customer satisfaction with online services Ability to scale up capacity to meet increased demand Customers can still be served by remote workers Improved customer self-service options
    Maximize stakeholder value Transition to OpEx spend and reduce CapEx investments Access to accurate data on services and spending Improved IT cost forecasting

    Optional: Identify current total cost of ownership

    Be mindful of hidden costs, such as those associated with supporting multiple devices and maintaining a small fleet of corporate devices to ensure business continuity with BYOD.

    • Use the Hardware Asset Management Budgeting Tool to forecast spend on devices (and infrastructure) based on project needs and devices nearing end of life.
    • Use the Mobile Strategy TCO Calculator to estimate the total cost of all the different aspects of your mobile strategy, including:
      • Training
      • Management platforms
      • Custom app development
      • Travel and roaming
      • Stipends and taxes
      • Support
    • Revisit these calculators in Phase 2. Use the TCO calculator when considering different approaches to mobility and end-user computing.

    Insert the results into your End-User Computing Strategy Template.

    Download the HAM Budgeting Tool.

    Download the Mobile Strategy TCO Calculator.

    Step 1.2

    Perform a User Group Analysis

    Activities

    1.2.1 Organize roles based on how they work

    1.2.2 Organize users into groups

    1.2.3 Document the current offerings

    1.2.4 Brainstorm pain points and desired gains for each user group

    This step requires the following inputs:

    • List of roles and technologies
    • User feedback
    • List of personas

    This step involves the following participants:

    • End-User Computing Team
    • IT Leadership
    • End-User Computing Manager

    Outcomes of this step

    • List of user groups and use cases for each group
    • List of current offerings for each user group
    • Value analysis for each user group

    Gather the information you need

    Use the Application Portfolio Assessment to run a relationship survey.

    Dive deeper with the blueprint Improve Requirements Gathering.

    List of Roles and Technology

    Organization chart: Consult with HR or department leaders to provide a list of the different roles that exist in each department.

    Identity access management tools: You can consult tools like Active Directory, but only if the data is clean.

    Apps and devices used: Run a report from your endpoint management tool to see what devices and apps are used by one another. Supplement this report with a report from a network management tool to identify software as a service that are in use and/or consult with department leaders.

    User Feedback

    Relationship surveys: Tools like the End-User Application Satisfaction Diagnostic allow you to assess overall satisfaction with IT.

    Focus groups and interviews: Gather unstructured feedback from users about their apps and devices.

    User shadowing: Observe people as they use technology to identify improvement opportunities (e.g. shadow meetings, review video call recordings).

    Ticket data: Identify apps or systems that users submit the most incidents about as well as high-volume requests that could be automated.

    1.2.1 Organize roles based on how they work

    Start by organizing roles into categories based on where they work and how they interact with information.

    1. Define categories of where people work. Examples include:
      1. In office, at home, at client sites
      2. Stationary, sometimes mobile, always mobile
      3. Always in same location, sometimes in different locations, always in different locations within a site, mobile between sites
    2. Define categories of how people interact with information. Examples include:
      1. Reads information, reads and writes information, creates information
      2. Cases, projects, relationships
    3. Build a matrix. Use the location categories on one axis and the interaction categories on the other axis.
    4. Place unique job roles on the matrix. Review each functional group’s organizational chart. It is okay if you don’t fill every spot. See the diagram on this page for an example.
    Always Works in the Same Location Sometimes Works in Different Locations Always Works in Different Locations
    Predominantly Reads Information
    • Janitor
    • Receptionist
    • Receiving
    • Accounts Payable Clerk
    Reads and Writes Information
    • Sales Rep
    • Sales Manager
    • Director of Sales
    • Developer
    • Scrum Master
    • Customer Service Agent
    • CS Manager
    • Call Center Director
    • Accountant
    • Controller
    • HR Specialist
    • Business Analyst
    • VP, Sales
    • Product Manager
    • Project Manager
    • Director of Engineering
    • VP, HR
    • CFO
    • Director of PMO
    • Field Sales Rep
    • CEO
    • CIO
    • COO
    Predominantly Creates Information
    • External Consultants
    • Design
    • Marketing
    • Copywriting

    1.2.2 Organize users into groups

    Populate a user group worksheet for each in-scope group.

    1. Within each quadrant, group similar roles together into “User Groups.” Consider similarities such as:
      1. Applications they use
      2. Data and files with which they interact
      3. Business capabilities they support
    2. Document their high-level profile:
      1. Where they work
      2. Sensitivity of data they access
      3. Current device and app entitlements
    3. Document the resulting user groups. Record each user group on a separate worksheet in the User Group Analysis Workbook.

    Download the User Group Analysis Workbook.

    1.2.3 Document the current offerings

    For each user group, document:

    • Primary and secondary computing devices: Their most frequently used computing devices.
    • Acceptable use: Whether corporate-issued devices are personally enabled.
    • BYOD: Whether this persona is authorized to use their personal devices.
    • Standard equipment provided: Equipment that is offered to everyone in this persona.
    • Additional devices and equipment offered: Equipment that is offered to a subset of this user group. These items can include more prestigious computers, additional monitors, and office equipment for users allowed to work remotely. This category can include items that require approval from budget owners.
    • Top apps: What apps are most commonly used by this user group? What common nonstandard apps are used by this user group?

    Standardize the nonstandard

    When users such as VIP users want more than the standard offering, have a more prestigious option available. This approach will help you to proactively anticipate your users’ needs.

    1.2.4 Brainstorm pain points and desired gains for each user group

    Don’t focus only on their experiences with technology

    Reference the common personas listed on the next page to help you brainstorm additional pain points and desired gains.

    1. Brainstorm pain points. Answer these questions for each role:
      1. What do people find tedious about their day-to-day jobs?
      2. What takes the most effort for them to do?
      3. What about their current toolset makes this user frustrated?
      4. What makes working difficult? Consider their experiences working from a home office, attending meetings virtually or in person, and working in the office.
      5. What challenges does that role have with each process?
    2. Brainstorm desired gains from their technology. Answer these questions for each role:
      1. For your end-user computing vision to become a reality for this persona, what outcomes or benefits are required?
      2. What benefits will this persona expect an end-user computing strategy to have?
      3. What improvements does this role desire?
      4. What unexpected benefits or outcomes would surprise this role?
      5. What would make this role’s day-to-day easier?
      6. What location-specific benefits are there (e.g. outcomes specific to working in the office or at home)?

    Record each user group’s pain points and desired gains on their respective worksheet.

    For additional questions you can ask, visit this Strategyzer blog post by Alexander Osterwalder.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Identify out-of-scope benefits?

    If that desired gain is required for the vision to be achieved for a specific role, you have two options:

    • Bring the benefit in scope. Ensure your metrics are updated.
    • Bring this user group out of scope. End-user computing improvements will not be valuable to this role without that benefit.

    Forcing a user group to use an unsatisfactory tool will severely undermine your chance of success, especially in the project’s early stages.

    Consider these common personas when brainstorming challenges and desired gains

    What unique challenges will these personas face within each of your user groups? What improvements would each of these personas expect out of an end-user computing strategy?

    Early Adopters

    • Like trying new ways of working and using the latest technology.
    • Very comfortable solving their own issues.
    • Enjoy exploring and creating new ways of handling challenges.

    Late Adopters

    • Prefer consistent ways of working, be it tech or business processes.
    • React to tech issues with anxiety and need assistance to get issues fixed.

    VIP

    • Has a prestigious job and would like to use technology that communicates their status.
    • Does not like to resolve their own issues.

    Road Warriors

    • Always on the go, running between work meetings and appointments.
    • Value flexibility and want devices, apps, and tech support that can be used anywhere at any time.

    Hoarders

    • Want to keep all their devices, data, and apps.
    • Will stall when they need to migrate devices or uninstall apps and become unresponsive any time there is a risk of losing something.

    Step 1.3

    Define the Vision

    Activities

    1.3.1 Prioritize which benefits you want to achieve

    1.3.2 Identify how you will track performance

    1.3.3 Craft a vision statement that demonstrates what you’re trying to create

    1.3.4 Craft a mission statement for your end-user computing team

    1.3.5 Define guiding principles

    This step requires the following inputs:

    • Goals cascade
    • List of benefits
    • List of critical success factors (CSFs)

    This step involves the following participants:

    • End-User Computing Manager
    • CIO
    • Help Desk Manager
    • Infrastructure Manager

    Outcomes of this step

    • End-User computing KPIs and metrics
    • Vision statement
    • Mission statement

    1.3.1 Prioritize which benefits you want to achieve

    Use the MoSCoW sorting technique

    Select benefits that appear multiple times in the goals cascade from Activity 1.1.3 as well as your challenges from your current-state assessment.

    1. Record which benefits are “Must Haves.” Select benefits that are most important to your highest-priority stakeholders.
    2. Record which benefits are “Should Haves.” These benefits are important but not critical.
    3. Record which benefits are “Could Haves.” These are low-priority benefits.
    4. Record the remaining benefits under “Won’t Have.” These benefits are out-of-scope but can be revisited in the future.

    Record the output in your End-User Computing Strategy Template under “Benefit Prioritization” in the “Vision and Desired Benefits” section.

    Sample output:

    Must Have Should Have Could Have Won't Have
    • Customers can still be served by remote workers.
    • Easier to work in multiple locations.
    • More options for provisioning computers to new workers.
    • Improved patching and security compliance checking of remote devices.
    • Self-service app installs on Windows.
    • More consistent experience across all devices and platforms, including BYOD.
    • Improved visibility into and manageability of BYOD.
    • Ability for users to create their own low-code apps (e.g. in Microsoft Power Apps).
    • Improved guidelines for running hybrid/remote meetings.
    • BYOD support for workers handling sensitive data.
    • Support for any type of Android smartphone or tablet.

    1.3.2 Identify how you will track performance

    1. List each unique high-priority benefit from Activity 1.3.1 as a critical success factor (CSF).
    2. For each CSF, identify key performance indicators (KPIs) that you can use to track how well you’re progressing on the CSF.
      1. Articulate that KPI as a SMART goal (specific, measurable, achievable, realistic, and timebound).
    3. For each KPI, identify the metrics you will use to calculate it.
    4. Identify how and when you will:
      1. Capture the current state of these metrics.
      2. Update changes to the metrics.
      3. Re-evaluate the CSFs.
      4. Communicate the progress to the project team and to stakeholders.

    Record this information in your End-User Computing Strategy Template.

    Sample output:

    Critical Success Factor Key Performance Indicator Metrics
    Improve remote worker productivity Increase employee engagement by 10% in two years
    • McLean Employee Engagement Score
    • Gallup Q Score
    Integrate relevant information sources into one spot for sales Integrate three information sources that will be useful to sales in one year
    • # of sales-specific apps integrated into a dashboard, portal, or workspace
    • Sales satisfaction scores
    Reduce real-estate costs Reduce office space by 50% in two cities over three years
    • $ spent on office leases
    Securely deliver all apps, information, and data to any device, anywhere, at any time Build the apps and information sources into a digital workspace for three business processes over one year
    • # of business processes supported in the workspace

    1.3.3 Craft a vision statement that demonstrates what you’re trying to create

    The vision statement communicates a desired future state of the IT organization. The statement is expressed in the present tense. It seeks to articulate the desired role of IT and how IT will be perceived.

    Strong IT vision statements have the following characteristics:

    • Describes a desired future
    • Focuses on ends, not means
    • Communicates promise
    • Is:
      • Concise; no unnecessary words
      • Compelling
      • Achievable
      • Inspirational
      • Memorable

    Sample IT Vision Statements:

    • To support an exceptional employee experience by providing best-in-class end-user devices.
    • Securely enable access to corporate apps and data from anywhere, at any time, on any device.
    • Enable business and digital transformation through secure and powerful virtualization technology.
    • IT is a cohesive, proactive, and disciplined team that delivers innovative technology solutions while demonstrating a strong customer-oriented mindset.

    1.3.4 Craft a mission statement for your end-user computing team

    The IT mission statement specifies the function’s purpose or reason for being. The mission should guide each day’s activities and decisions. The mission statement should use simple and concise terminology and speak loudly and clearly, generating enthusiasm for the organization.

    Strong IT mission statements have the following characteristics:

    • Articulate the IT function’s purpose and reason for existence
    • Describe what the IT function does to achieve its vision
    • Define the customers of the IT function
    • Can be described as:
      • Compelling
      • Easy to grasp
      • Sharply focused
      • Inspirational
      • Memorable
      • Concise

    Sample IT Mission Statements:

    • To provide infrastructure, support, and innovation in the delivery of secure, enterprise-grade information technology products and services that enable and empower the workforce at [Company Name].
    • To help fulfill organizational goals, the IT department is committed to empowering business stakeholders with technology and services that facilitate effective processes, collaboration, and communication.
    • The mission of the information technology (IT) department is to build a solid, comprehensive technology infrastructure; to maintain an efficient, effective operations environment; and to deliver high-quality, timely services that support the business goals and objectives of [Company Name].
    • The IT group is customer-centered and driven by its commitment to management and staff. It oversees services in computing, telecommunications, networking, administrative computing, and technology training.

    1.3.5 Define guiding principles

    Select principles that align with your stakeholders’ goals and objectives

    Use these examples as a starting point:

    IT Principle Name IT Principle Statement
    1. Enterprise value focus We aim to provide maximum long-term benefits to the enterprise as a whole while optimizing total costs of ownership and risks.
    2. Fit for purpose We maintain capability levels and create solutions that are fit for purpose without over-engineering them.
    3. Simplicity We choose the simplest solutions and aim to reduce operational complexity of the enterprise.
    4. Reuse > buy > build We maximize reuse of existing assets. If we can’t reuse, we procure externally. As a last resort, we build custom solutions.
    5. Managed data We handle data creation, modification, and use enterprise-wide in compliance with our data governance policy.
    6. Controlled technical diversity We control the variety of technology platforms we use.
    7. Managed security We manage, support, and assist in the implementation of security enterprise-wide in collaboration with our security governance team.
    8. Compliance to laws and regulations We operate in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations.
    9. Innovation We seek innovative ways to use technology for business advantage.
    10. Customer centricity We deliver best experiences to our end users by aligning to customer service best practices.

    Phase 2

    Define the Offering

    Set the Direction

    1.1 Identify Desired Benefits

    1.2 Perform a User Group Analysis

    1.3 Define the Vision

    Define the Offering

    2.1 Define the Standard Offerings

    2.2 Outline Supporting Services

    2.3 Define Governance and Policies

    Build the Roadmap

    3.1 Develop Initiatives

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Defining standard device entitlements and provisioning models for end-user devices and equipment
    • Shifting end-user computing support left
    • Identifying policy gaps

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • End-User Computing Team
    • IT Leadership

    Step 2.1

    Define the Standard Offerings

    Activities

    2.1.1 Identify the provisioning models for each user group

    2.1.2 Define the standard device offerings

    2.1.3 Document each user group’s entitlements

    This step requires the following inputs:

    • Standard End-User Entitlements and Offerings Template
    • List of persona groups
    • Primary computing devices
    • Secondary computing devices
    • Supporting operating systems
    • Applications and office equipment

    This step involves the following participants:

    • End-User Computing Manager
    • CIO
    • Help Desk Manager
    • Infrastructure Manager

    Outcomes of this step

    • End-user device entitlements and offerings standard

    This step will walk you through defining standard offerings

    You will define the base offering for all users in each user group as well as additional items that users can request (but that require additional approvals).

    1. Primary Computing Device
      • The main device used by a worker to complete their job (e.g. laptop for knowledge workers, kiosk or shared tablet for frontline workers).
    2. Secondary Computing Devices
      • Additional devices that supports a worker (e.g. a smartphone, tablet, personal computer).
    3. Provisioning Models
      • Whether the equipment is corporate-issued versus personally owned and whether personal use of corporate resources is allowed.
    4. Apps
      • The software used by the worker. Apps can be locally installed, cloud-based (e.g. SaaS), and/or virtualized and running remotely.
    5. Peripherals
      • Additional equipment provisioned to the end user (e.g. monitors, docking station, mice, keyboards).

    There is always a challenge of determining who gets what and when

    The goal is balancing cost, risk, and employee engagement

    The right balance will be different for every organization

    • IT can’t always say no to new ideas from the business. For example, if the organization wants to adopt Macs, rather than resisting IT should focus on identifying how Macs can be safely implemented.
    • Smartphones may not be necessary for a job, but they can be a valid employee perk. Not every employee may be entitled to the perk. There may be resentment between employees of the same level if one of the employees has a corporate-issued, business-only phone for their job function.
    • The same laptop model may not work for everyone. Some employees may need more powerful computers. Some employees may want more prestigious devices. Other employees may require a suite of apps that is only available on non-Windows operating systems.

    Action Item: Provide a defined set of standard options to the business to proactively address different needs.

    A good end-user computing strategy will effectively balance:

    • User Choice
    • Risk
    • Cost

    Your standard offerings need to strike the right balance for your organization.

    Review the End-User Computing Ideas Catalog

    Compare pros and cons of computing devices and operating systems for better decision making

    The catalog provides information about choices in:

    • Provisioning models
    • Operating systems
    • Device form factors

    Review the catalog to learn about items that can help your organization to achieve the desired vision from Phase 1.

    As you review the catalog, think about these questions:

    • What primary and secondary devices can you provide?
    • What operating systems do these devices support?
    • What are the provisioning models you will use, considering each model’s weaknesses and strengths?
    • How can you more effectively balance user choice, risk, and cost?

    Download the End-User Computing Ideas Catalog.

    2.1.1 Identify the provisioning models for each user group

    1. Review the definitions in the End-User Computing Ideas Catalog.
    2. Build a table. List the major user groups along the top of the table and applications down the rows.
    3. Brainstorm provisioning models that will be used for primary and secondary devices for each persona group.
    4. Record your provisioning models in the Standard End-User Entitlements and Offerings Template.

    Download the End-User Computing Ideas Catalog.

    Download the Standard End-User Entitlements and Offerings Template.

    Persona Primary Computing Device Secondary Laptops or Computers Smartphone Tablet
    Sales COPE BYOD BYOD BYOD
    Field Sales CYOD BYOD COBO COBO
    Customer Service COBO None None None
    Knowledge Worker COPE BYOD BYOD BYOD
    App Dev CYOPED None CYOD CYOD
    VIP CYOPED CYOPED CYOPE BYOD

    Identify multiple device options

    Offer standard, power, and prestigious offerings

    Prioritize offering models and align them with your user groups.

    • Standard device: This offering will work for most end users.
    • Power device: This offering will provide additional RAM, processor speed, storage, etc., for users that require it. It is usually offered as an additional option that requires approval.
    • Prestigious device: This offering will be provided to VIP users.
    • Portable device: This offering is for employees within a user group that moves around more often than others. This type of offering is optional – consider having a separate user group for these users that get a more portable laptop as their standard device.

    Standardize the nonstandard

    When users such as VIP users want more than the standard offering, have a more prestigious option ready to offer. This approach will help you to proactively anticipate your users’ needs.

    Who approves?

    Generally, if it is a supported device, then the budget owner determines whether to allow the user to receive a more powerful or more prestigious device.

    This decision can be based on factors such as:

    • Business need – does the user need the device to do their job?
    • Perk or benefit – is the device being offered to the end user as a means of increasing their engagement?

    If IT gets this answer wrong, then it can result in shadow IT

    Document your answer in the Device Entitlement Policy Template.

    2.1.2 Define the standard device offerings

    Consider all devices and their supporting operating systems.

    1. On a flip chart or whiteboard, build a matrix of the supported form factors and operating systems.
    2. For each cell, document the supported vendor and device model.
    3. Identify where you will provide additional options.
    Windows Mac OS iOS Android
    Laptops Lenovo T15 Gen 2 MacBook Pro 14” N/A N/A
    Power Laptops Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon MacBook Pro 16” N/A N/A
    Prestigious Laptops Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga Gen 6 MacBook Pro 16” N/A N/A
    Tablets Microsoft Surface N/A iPad Pro Samsung Galaxy Tab
    Smartphones N/A N/A iPhone 13 Samsung Galaxy S21

    2.1.3 Document each user groups’ entitlements

    Not every persona needs to be entitled to every supported option

    Use the Standard End-User Entitlements and Offerings Template as a starting point.

    • Create a separate section in the document for each persona. Start by documenting the provisioning models for each type of device.
    • Record the standard offering provided to members of each persona as well as additional items that can be provided with approval. Record this information for:
      • Primary computing devices
      • Secondary computing devices
    • Optional: Document additional items that will be provided to members of each persona as well as additional items they can request, such as:
      • Apps
      • Office equipment

    Download the Standard End-User Entitlements and Offerings Template.

    Step 2.2

    Outline Supporting Services

    Activities

    2.2.1 Review device management tools and capabilities

    2.2.2 Identify common incidents and requests for devices

    2.2.3 Record how you want to shift resolution

    2.2.4 Define which IT groups are involved in supporting practices

    Define the Offering

    This step requires the following inputs:

    • Standard End-User Entitlements and Offerings Template
    • List of supporting devices
    • Common incidents and requests
    • List of supporting practices

    This step involves the following participants:

    • End-User Computing Manager
    • CIO
    • Help Desk Manager
    • Infrastructure Manager

    Outcomes of this step

    • List of IT groups who are involved in supporting devices
    • Responsibilities of each group for requests and incidents

    2.2.1 Review device management tools and capabilities

    Document the tools that you use to manage each OS and identify gaps

    If there are different approaches to managing the same OS (e.g. Windows devices that are co-managed versus Windows devices that are only managed by Intune), then list those approaches on separate rows.

    Provision Protect from loss/theft Deploy/update apps Backup & protect Protect from injections Complies with policies Track Decommission
    Windows 10 & 11 (co-managed) Autopilot Gap ConfigMgr Gap Windows Security ConfigMgr ConfigMgr Intune Intune and Autopilot
    Windows 10 & 11 (Intune) Autopilot Intune (remote wipe) Intune OneDrive for Business Windows Security Microsoft Advanced Threat Protection Intune Intune and Autopilot
    Mac OS Jamf Pro Intune (remote wipe) Jamf Pro OneDrive for Business Gap Jamf Pro Intune Jamf Pro

    Document the results on the “IT Management Tools” slide in the “IT Support” section of your End-User Computing Strategy Template.

    2.2.2 Identify common incidents and requests for devices

    Analyze your service desk ticket data. Look for the following information:

    • The most common incidents and service requests around end-user devices and business apps
    • Incident categories and service requests that almost always involve escalations

    Record the level at which these tickets can be resolved today. Ensure you include these groups:

    • Tier 0 (i.e. end-user self-service)
    • Tier 1 (i.e. user’s first point of contact at the service desk)
    • Desk-side support and field-support groups
    • End-user computing specialist teams (e.g. desktop engineering, mobile device management teams)
    • Other specialist teams (e.g. security, enterprise applications, DevOps)

    Record the desired state. For each incident and request, to where do you want to shift resolution?

    Record this chart on the “Current State of IT Support” slide in the “IT Support” section of your End-User Computing Strategy Template.

    Most Common Incidents & Requests Self-Service Service Desk Tier 1 Desk-Side or Field Support End-User Computing
    Connect/fix a printer X
    Web conferencing issue X
    Bluetooth issues X
    Outlook issues X
    Install standard app X
    Install app requiring approval X
    Install nonstandard app X
    Enroll personal iOS/Android device X
    Enroll personal Mac/Windows computer X
    Perform a factory reset on a lost or stolen device X
    Unenroll device X

    2.2.3 Record how you want to shift resolution

    Identify opportunities to improve self-service and first contact resolution.

    Starting with the chart you created in Activity 2.2.2, record the desired state. For each incident and request, to where do you want to shift resolution?

    • Identify quick wins. Where will it take low effort to shift resolution? Denote these items with a “QW” for quick win.
    • Identify high-value, high-effort shifts. Where do you want to prioritize shifting resolution? Base this decision on the desired benefits, guiding principles, and vision statement built in Phase 1. Denote these items with an “H” for high.
    • Identify low-value areas. Where would shifting provide low value to end users and/or would have low alignment to the benefits identified in Phase 1? Denote these items with an “L” for low.
    • Identify where no shift can occur. Some items cannot be shifted to self-service or to tier 1 due to governance considerations, security factors, or technical complexity. Denote these items with an “OoS” for out of scope.

    Use the “Opportunities to Provide Self-Service and Articles” and “Desired State” slides in the “IT Support” section of your End-User Computing Strategy Template to document quick wins and high-value, high-effort shifts.

    Most Common Incidents & Requests Self-Service Service Desk Tier 1 Desk-Side or Field Support End-User Computing
    Connect/fix a printer H QW X
    Web conferencing issue H X
    Bluetooth issues L X
    Outlook issues H H X
    Install standard app X
    Install app requiring approval H X
    Install nonstandard app OoS X
    Enroll personal iOS/Android device QW QW X
    Enroll personal Mac/Windows computer QW QW X
    Perform a factory reset on a lost or stolen device QW QW X
    Unenroll device QW QW X

    2.2.4 Define which IT groups are involved in supporting practices

    Repeat activities 2.2.2 and 2.2.3 with the following list of tasks

    IT Asset Management

    • Purchasing devices
    • Purchasing software licenses
    • Imaging devices
    • Deploying devices
    • Deploying software
    • Recovering devices
    • Recovering software

    Release Management

    • Testing patches
    • Testing app updates
    • Testing OS updates
    • User acceptance testing

    Managing Service Catalogs

    • Defining standard device offerings
    • Defining standard software offerings
    • Defining device and software entitlements
    • Updating published catalog entries

    Knowledge Management

    • Writing internal KB articles
    • Writing user-facing articles
    • Training specialists
    • Training service desk agents
    • Training users

    Portfolio Management

    • Prioritizing app upgrades or migrations
    • Prioritizing OS migrations
    • Prioritizing end-user computing projects

    Step 2.3

    Define Governance and Policies

    Activities

    2.3.1 Answer these organizational policy questions

    2.3.2 Answer these security policy questions

    Define the Offering

    This step requires the following inputs:

    • List of supporting devices
    • List of persona groups
    • List of use cases

    This step involves the following participants:

    • End-User Computing Manager
    • CIO
    • Help Desk Manager
    • Infrastructure Manager

    Outcomes of this step

    • End-user computing organizational and security policies

    Focus on organizational policies and enforcement

    Policies set expectations and limits for mobile employees

    Enforcement refers to settings on the devices, management and security tools, and process steps.

    • Policies define what should and should not be done with user-facing technology. These policies define expectations about user and IT behavior.
    • Enforcement ensures that policies are followed. User policies must often be enforced through human intervention, while technology policies are often enforced directly through infrastructure before any people get involved.

    Use the “Policies” section in the End-User Computing Strategy Template to document the answers in this section. Activities 2.3.2 and 2.3.3 present links to policy templates. Use these templates to help address any gaps in your current policy suite.

    2.3.1 Answer these organizational policy questions

    Identify if there are different expectations for certain user groups, where exceptions are allowed, and how these policies will be enforced.

    Entitlements

    • Who is entitled to receive and use prestigious computers?
    • Who is entitled to receive and use a smartphone?
    • What users are entitled to a stipend for personal device use?

    Personal Device Use

    • What use cases are supported and are not supported on personal devices?
    • What level of visibility and control does IT need over personal devices?

    Acceptable Use

    • Are people allowed to use corporate resources for personal use?
    • What are the guidelines around personal use?
    • Are users allowed to install personal apps on their corporate-issued computers and/or mobile devices?

    Purchasing and Reimbursement

    • Who is allowed to purchase devices? Apps?
    • When can users file a reimbursement request?

    Employee Monitoring

    • What user information is monitored?
    • When can that information be used and when can it not be used?

    Use the “Policies” section of the End-User Computing Strategy Template to document these answers.

    Identify organizational policy gaps

    Use these templates as a starting point

    Entitlements

    Download the Mobile Device Connectivity & Allowance Policy template.

    Purchasing & Reimbursement

    Download the Purchasing Policy template.

    Download the Mobile Device Reimbursement Policy template.

    Download the Mobile Device Reimbursement Agreement template.

    Acceptable Use

    Download the General Security – User Acceptable Use Policy template.

    Personal Device Use

    Download the BYOD Acceptable Use Policy template.

    Download the Mobile Device Remote Wipe Waiver template.

    Employee Monitoring

    Download the General Security – User Acceptable Use Policy template.

    Visit the Reduce and Manage Your Organization’s Insider Threat Risk blueprint to address this gap.

    2.3.2 Answer these security policy questions

    Identify if there are different expectations for certain user groups, where exceptions are allowed, and how these policies will be enforced.

    Use Cases

    • What data and use cases are subject to stricter security measures?
    • Are certain use cases or data prohibited on personal devices?
    • Are there restrictions around where certain use cases are performed and by whom?

    Patching

    • Are users expected to apply OS and app updates and patches? Or does IT automate patching?

    Physical Security

    • What does the user need to do to secure their equipment?
    • If a device is lost or stolen, who does the user contact to report the lost or stolen device?

    Cybersecurity

    • How will IT enforce security configuration baselines?
    • What does the user need to do (or not do) to secure their device?
    • Are certain users allowed to have local admin rights?
    • What happens when a device doesn’t comply with the required security configuration baseline?

    Use the “Policies” section of the End-User Computing Strategy Template to document these answers.

    Identify security policy gaps

    Use these templates as a starting point

    Use Cases

    Download the General Security – User Acceptable Use Policy template.

    Visit the Discover and Classify Your Data blueprint to address this gap.

    Patching

    Download the General Security – User Acceptable Use Policy template.

    Physical and Cyber Security

    Download the General Security – User Acceptable Use Policy template.

    Visit the Develop and Deploy Security Policies blueprint to address this gap.

    For help defining your own security configuration baselines for each operating system, reference best practice documentation such as:

    National Institute of Standards and Technology’s National Checklist Program.

    Center for Internet Security’s solutions.

    Microsoft’s security baseline settings for Windows 10 and 11 Configuration Service Providers.

    Phase 3

    Build the Roadmap

    Set the Direction

    1.1 Identify Desired Benefits

    1.2 Perform a User Group Analysis

    1.3 Define the Vision

    Define the Offering

    2.1 Define the Standard Offerings

    2.2 Outline Supporting Services

    2.3 Define Governance and Policies

    Build the Roadmap

    3.1 Develop Initiatives

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Defining initiatives for each EUC domain
    • Building a customer journey map for any end-user computing migrations
    • Building a roadmap for EUC initiatives

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • End-User Computing Team

    Step 3.1

    Develop Initiatives

    Activities

    3.1.1 Identify initiatives for each EUC practice

    3.1.2 Build out the user’s migration journey map

    3.1.3 Build out a list of initiatives

    Build the Roadmap

    This step requires the following inputs:

    • User group workbook
    • Migration initiatives

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Infrastructure Director
    • Head of End-User Computing
    • End-User Computing Team
    • Project Manager (if applicable)

    Outcomes of this step

    • End-user computing roadmap
    • Migration plan

    3.1.1 Identify the gaps in each EUC area

    Build a high-level profile of the changes you want to make

    For each of the five areas, build a profile for the changes you want to implement. Record:

    1. The owner of the area
    2. The objective that you want to accomplish
    3. The desired benefits from focusing on that area
    4. Any dependencies to the work
    5. Risks that can cause the objective and benefits to not be achieved

    Identify the initiatives involved in each area.

    Document these profiles and initiatives in the “Roadmap” section of your End-User Computing Strategy Template.

    1. Devices
      • Corporate-issued devices
      • Standard offerings
    2. User Support
      • Self-service
      • Tier 1 support
    3. Use Cases
      • Providing value
      • Business apps
    4. Policy & Governance
      • Personal device use
      • IT policy
    5. Fitness for Use
      • Securing devices
      • Patching

    Your initiatives may require a user migration

    Plan the user’s migration journey

    Consider each user group’s and each persona’s unique needs and challenges throughout the migration.

    1. Preparing to migrate: The user may need to schedule the migration with IT and back up files.
    2. Migrating: IT executes the migration (e.g. updates the OS, changes management tools).
    3. Getting assistance: When a user experiences an error during the migration, how will they get help from IT?
    4. Post-migration: How will IT and the user know that the migration was successful one week later?

    Understand the three migration approaches

    Online

    Users execute the migrate on their own (e.g. Microsoft’s consumer migration to Windows 10).

    In person

    Users come in person, select a device, and perform the migration with a specialist. If the device needs support, they return to the same place (e.g. buying a computer from a store).

    Hybrid

    Users select a device. When the device is ready, they can schedule time to pick up the device and perform the migration with a specialist (e.g. purchasing an iPhone in advance from Apple’s website with in-store pick-up).

    Be prepared to support remotely

    Migrations to the new tool may fail. IT should check in with the user to confirm that the device successfully made the migration.

    3.1.2 Build out the user’s migration journey map

    Contemplate a roadmap to plan for end-user computing initiatives

    • As a group, brainstorm migration initiatives.
    • For each of the four phases, identify:
      • User activities: actions we need the user to do
      • IT activities: actions and processes that IT will perform internally
      • User touchpoints with IT: how the user will interact with the IT group
      • Opportunities: ideas for how IT can provide additional value to the end user in this phase.
    • Use the example in the End-User Computing Strategy Template as a starting point.

    Download the End-User Computing Strategy Template.

    Embed requirements gathering throughout your roadmap

    Use a combination of surveys, focus groups, and interviews

    You’re doing more than eliciting opinions – you’re performing organizational change management.

    • Use surveys to profile the demand for specific requirements. When a project is announced, develop surveys to gauge what users consider must-have, should-have, and could-have requirements.
    • Interviews should be used with high-value targets. Those who receive one-on-one face time can help generate good requirements and allow for effective communication around requirements.
    • Focus groups are used to get input from multiple people in a similar role. This format allows you to ask a few open-ended questions to groups of about five people.

    The benefits of interviews and focus groups:

    • Foster direct engagement: IT is able to hear directly from stakeholders about what they are looking to do with a solution and the level of functionality that they expect from it.
    • Offer greater detail: With interviews, greater insight can be gained by leveraging information that traditional surveys wouldn’t uncover. Face-to-face interactions provide thorough answers and context that helps inform requirements.
    • Remove ambiguity: Face-to-face interactions allow opportunities to follow up on ambiguous answers. Clarify what stakeholders are looking for and expect in a project.
    • Enable stakeholder management: Interviews are a direct line of communication with project stakeholders. They provide input and insight and help to maintain alignment, plan next steps, and increase awareness within the IT organization.

    Activity instructions:

    1. Early requirements ideation: Identify who you want to interview through one-on-one meetings and focus groups.
    2. Requirements validation and prioritization: Identify which user groups you plan to survey and when.
    3. Usability testing: Plan to include usability testing during each phase. Build it into your release practices.

    3.1.3 Build out a list of initiatives

    Download a copy of the Roadmap Tool

    On tab “1. Setup”:

    • Update category 1 to be all the EUC areas (i.e. Devices, User Support).
    • Update category 2 and category 3 with meaningful items (e.g. operating system, device model, persona group).

    Use tab “2. Data Entry” to record your list of initiatives.

    • Each initiative should have its own row. Write a high-level summary under “Roadmap Item” and include more detail under “Description and Rationale.”
    • Enter each initiative’s effort, priority, and timeline for beginning. These are mandatory fields for tab “3. Roadmap” to work properly.

    Use tab “3. Roadmap” to visualize your data. You will have to press “Refresh All” under Data in the ribbon for the PivotChart to update.

    Copy the roadmap visual on tab “3. Roadmap” into your End-User Computing Strategy Template. You can also copy the list of initiatives over into the document.

    Download the Roadmap Tool.

    Summary of Accomplishment

    Problem Solved

    You built a strategy to improve the balance between user enablement, risk mitigation, and cost optimization. Throughout the blueprint, you identified opportunities to provide additional value to end users and stakeholders during these activities:

    • Goals cascade
    • User group analysis
    • Definition of standard device types and platforms
    • IT support shift-left analysis
    • Policy gap analysis
    • Roadmapping

    If you would like additional support, have our analysts guide you through other phases as part of an Info-Tech workshop.

    Contact your account representative for more information.

    workshops@infotech.com

    1-888-670-8889

    Additional Support

    If you would like additional support, have our analysts guide you through other phases as part of an Info-Tech Workshop.

    Contact your account representative for more information.

    workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8889

    To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.

    Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech’s historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    Identify User Groups

    Identify each user group based on the business processes, tasks, and applications they use.

    Define Standard Device Offerings

    Record your provisioning models for each user group and the primary and secondary devices, apps, and peripherals that each group receives.

    Related Info-Tech Research

    Simplify Remote Deployment With Zero-Touch Provisioning

    This project helps you align your zero-touch approach with stakeholder priorities and larger IT strategies. You will be able to build your zero-touch provisioning and patching plan from both the asset lifecycle and the end-user perspective to create a holistic approach that emphasizes customer service. Tailor deployment plans to more easily scope and resource deployment projects.

    Implement Hardware Asset Management

    This project will help you analyze the current state of your HAM program, define assets that will need to be managed, and build and involve the ITAM team from the beginning to help embed the change. It will also help you define standard policies, processes, and procedures for each stage of the hardware asset lifecycle, from procurement through to disposal.

    Govern Office 365

    This project will help you conduct a goals exercise and capability assessment for Office 365. You will be able to refine governance objectives, build out controls, formalize governance, build out one pagers, and finalize a communication plan.

    Research Contributors and Experts

    • Steve Fox, Deputy IT Director, Virginia State Corporation Commission
    • Mazen Joukhadar, TransForm Shared Service Organization
    • Nathan Schlaud, PMO Senior Director, RPC Inc.
    • Rebecca Mountjoy, Infrastructure Systems Manager, BlueScope Buildings
    • DJ Robins, Director of Information Technology, Mohawk MedBuy
    • Jason Jenkins, Tech. Specialist, Michal Baker Corp.
    • Brad Wells, IT Infrastructure Solutions Architect, London Police Service
    • Danelle Peddell, Director, Project Management Office, Emco Corporation
    • John Annand, Principal Research Director, Info-Tech Research Group
    • Allison Kinnaird, Research Director and Research Lead, Info-Tech Research Group
    • Sandi Conrad, Principal Research Director, Info-Tech Research Group
    • Andrew Kum-Seun, Senior Research Analyst, Info-Tech Research Group
    • Mark Tauschek, Vice President IT Infrastructure & Operations Research, Info-Tech Research Group

    A special thank-you to 6 anonymous contributors

    Bibliography

    “2020 Annual Report and Proxy.” Citrix, 2020. Accessed Oct. 2021.

    “2021 BYOD Security Report.” Cybersecurity Insiders, 2021. Web.

    Anderson, Arabella. “12 Remote Work Statistics to Know in 2022.” NorthOne, 2021. Accessed Oct. 2021.

    Bayes, Scarlett. “ITSM: 2021 & Beyond.” Service Desk Institute, 14 April 2021, p. 14. Web.

    Belton, Padraig. “Intel: Chip shortage will extend to at least 2023.” Light Reading, 22 Oct. 2021. Web.

    Beroe Inc. “Demand for PC Components Saw a Surge Due to COVID-19, Says Beroe Inc.” Cision PR Newswire, 2 Sept. 2021. Web.

    Devaraj, Vivekananthan. “Reference Architecture: Remote PC Access.” Citrix, 2021. Accessed Aug. 2021.

    “Elements of the Project Charter and Project Scope Statement.” A Guide to PMBOK, 7th edition, PMI, 2021. Accessed Sept. 2021.

    Elliott, Christopher. “This Is How The Pandemic Improved Customer Service.” Forbes, 2021. Accessed Oct. 2021.

    “Enable TMP 2.0 on your PC.” Microsoft, Support, Aug. 2021. Web.

    “End User Computing Trends to Look Out for in 2021.” Stratodesk, 30 Oct. 2020. Accessed September 2021.

    “Global State of Customer Service: The Transformation of Customer Service from 2015 to Present Day.” Microsoft, 2019. Web.

    Goodman, Elizabeth et al. “Observing the User Experience” A Practitioner's Guide to User Research, 2nd edition. Elsevier, 2012. Accessed Sept. 2021.

    Govindarajulu, Chittibabu. “An Instrument to Classify End-Users Based On the User Cube” Informing Science, June 2002. Accessed September 2021.

    Griffith, Eric. “Remote Employees to Bosses: Our PCs Suck!” PCMag, 11 Oct. 2021. Web.

    Hutchings, Jeffrey D., and Craig A. de Ridder. “Impact of Remote Working on End User Computing Solutions and Services.” Pillsbury, 2021. Accessed Sept. 2021

    “ITIL4 Create, Deliver, and Support.” Axelos, 2020. Accessed Sept. 2021.

    “ITIL4 Drive Stakeholder Value” Axelos, 2020. Accessed Sept. 2021.

    Mcbride, Neil, and Trevor Wood-Harper. “Towards User-Oriented Control of End-User Computing in Large Organizations” Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 33-41, 2002. Accessed September 2021.

    ““Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager Documentation.” Microsoft Docs, Microsoft, 2021. Accessed Sept. 2021.

    “Microsoft Intune documentation.” Microsoft Docs, Microsoft. Accessed Sept. 2021.

    “Mobile Cellular Subscriptions (per 100 People).” The World Bank, International Telecommunication Union (ITU) World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database, 2020. Web.

    Morgan, Jacob. “The Employee Experience Advantage: How to Win the War for Talent by Giving Employees the Workspaces they Want, the Tools they Need, and a Culture They Can Celebrate.” Wiley, 2017. Accessed Sept. 2021.

    Murphy, Anna. “How the pandemic has changed customer support forever.” Intercom, 2021. Accessed Sept. 2021.

    “Operating System Market Share Worldwide, Jan 2021-Jan 2022.” StatCounter GlobalStats, 2022. Web.

    “Operating System Market Share Worldwide, Jan-Dec 2011.” StatCounter GlobalStats, 2012. Web.

    Pereira, Karla Susiane, et al. “A Taxonomy to Classify Risk End-User Profile in Interaction with the Computing Environment.” In: Tryfonas T. (eds.) Human Aspects of Information Security, Privacy, and Trust. HAS 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 9750. Accessed Sept. 2021.

    Perrin, Andrew. “Mobile Technology and Home Broadband 2020.” Pew Research Center, 3 June 2021. Web.

    Quan-Haase, Anabel. “Technology and Society: Social Networks, Power, and Inequality” Oxford University Press, 2012. Accessed Aug. 2021.

    Reed, Karin, and Joseph Allen. “Suddenly Virtual: Making Remote Meetings Work.” Wiley, 2021. Accessed Aug. 2021.

    Rockart, John F., and Lauren S. Flannery. “The management of end user computing.” Communications of the ACM, vol. 26, no. 10, Oct. 1983. Accessed September 2021.

    Turek, Melanie. “Employees Say Smartphones Boost Productivity by 34 Percent: Frost & Sullivan Research.” Samsung Insights, 3 Aug. 2016. Web.

    Vladimirskiy, Vadim. “Windows 365 vs. Azure Virtual Desktop (AVD) – Comparing Two DaaS Products.” Nerdio, 2021. Accessed Aug. 2021.

    “VMware 2021 Annual Report.” VMware, Financial Document Library, 2021. Web.

    VMworld 2021, Oct. 2021.

    Vogels, Emily A. “Digital divide persists even as americans with lower incomes make gains in tech adoption.” Pew Research Center, 22 June 2021. Web.

    “What is End-User computing?” VMware, 2021. Accessed Aug. 2021.

    “Windows 10 Home and Pro.” Microsoft, Docs, 2021. Web.

    Zibreg, Christian. “Microsoft 365 Now Boasts Over 50 Million Subscribers.” MUD, 29 April 2021. Web.

    Agile Readiness Assessment Survey

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}160|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Development
    • Parent Category Link: /development
    • Today’s realities are driving organizations to digitize faster and become more Agile.
    • Agile transformations are difficult and frequently fail for a variety of reasons.
    • To achieve the benefits of Agile, organizations need to be ready for the significant changes that Agile demands.
    • Challenges to your Agile transformation can come from a variety of sources.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Use Info-Tech’s CLAIM+G model to examine potential roadblocks to Agile on six different organizational dimensions.
    • Use survey results to identify and address the issues that are most likely to derail your Agile transformation.

    Impact and Result

    • Better understand where and how your organization needs to change to support your Agile transformation.
    • Focus your attention on your organization’s biggest roadblocks to Agile.
    • Improve your organization’s chances of a successful Agile transformation.

    Agile Readiness Assessment Survey Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Agile Readiness Assessment Deck – A guide to help your organization survey its Agile readiness.

    Read this deck to see how an Agile Readiness Assessment can help your organization understand its readiness for Agile transformation. The storyboard guides you through how to collect, consolidate, and examine survey responses and create an actionable list of improvements to make your organization more Agile ready.

    • Agile Readiness Assessment Storyboard

    2. Survey Templates (Excel or MS Forms, available in English and French) – Use these templates to create and distribute the survey broadly within your organization.

    The Agile Readiness Assessment template is available in either Excel or Microsoft Forms (both English and French versions are available). Download the Excel templates here or use the links in the above deck to access the online versions of the survey.

    • Agile Readiness Survey – English
    • Agile Readiness Survey – French

    3. Agile Readiness Assessment Consolidated Results Tool – Use this tool to consolidate and analyze survey responses.

    The Agile Readiness Assessment Consolidated Results Tool allows you to consolidate survey responses by team/role and produces your heatmap for analysis.

    • Agile Readiness Assessment Consolidated Results Tool
    [infographic]

    Further reading

    Agile Readiness Assessment

    Understand how ready your organization is for an Agile transformation.

    Info-Tech Research Group Inc. is a global leader in providing IT research and advice. Info-Tech’s products and services combine actionable insight and relevant advice with ready-to-use tools and templates that cover the full spectrum of IT concerns.

    Analyst Perspective

    Use the wisdom of crowds to understand how ready you are for Agile transformation.

    Photo of Alex Ciraco, Principal Research Director, Application Delivery and Management, Info-Tech Research Group

    Agile transformations can be difficult and complex to implement. That’s because they require fundamental changes in the way an organization thinks and behaves (and many organizations are not ready for these changes).

    Use Info-Tech’s Agile Readiness Assessment to broadly survey the organization’s readiness for Agile along six dimensions:

    • Culture
    • Learning
    • Automation
    • Integrated teams
    • Metrics
    • Governance

    The survey results will help you to examine and address those areas that are most likely to hinder your move to Agile.

    Alex Ciraco
    Principal Research Director, Application Delivery and Management
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    • Your organization wants to shorten delivery time and improve quality by adopting Agile practices.
    • Your organization has not yet used Agile successfully.
    • You know that Agile transformations are complex and difficult to implement.
    • You want to maximize your Agile transformation’s chances of success.

    Common Obstacles

    • Risks to your Agile transformation can come from a variety of sources, including:
      • Organizational culture
      • Learning practices
      • Use of automation
      • Ability to create integrated teams
      • Use of metrics
      • Governance practices

    Info-Tech’s Approach

    • Use Info-Tech’s Agile Readiness Assessment to broadly survey your organization’s readiness for Agile.
    • Examine the consolidated results of this survey to identify challenges that are most likely to hinder Agile success.
    • Discuss and address these challenges to increase your chances of success.

    Info-Tech Insight

    By first understanding the numerous challenges to Agile transformations and then broadly surveying your organization to identify and address the challenges that are at play, you are more likely to have a successful Agile transformation.

    Info-Tech’s methodology

    1. Distribute Survey 2. Consolidate Survey Results 3. Examine Results and Problem Solve
    Phase Steps

    1.1 Identify the teams/roles you will survey.

    1.2 Configure the survey to reflect your teams/roles.

    1.3 Distribute the Agile Readiness Assessment Survey broadly in the organization.

    2.1 Collect survey responses from all participants.

    2.2 Consolidate the results using the template provided.

    3.1 Examine the consolidated results (both OVERALL and DETAILED Heatmaps)

    3.2 Identify key challenge areas (those which are most “red”) and discuss these challenges with participants

    3.3 Brainstorm, select and refine potential solutions to these challenges

    Phase Outcomes An appreciation for the numerous challenges associated with Agile transformations Identified challenges to Agile within your organization (both team-specific and organization-wide challenges) An actionable list of solutions/actions to address your organization’s Agile challenges.

    Blueprint deliverables

    Each step of this blueprint is accompanied by supporting deliverables to help you accomplish your goals.

    Agile Readiness Assessment Survey

    Survey the organization to understand your readiness for an Agile transformation on six dimensions.

    Sample of the Agile Readiness Assessment Survey blueprint deliverable.

    Agile Readiness Assessment Consolidated Results

    Examine your readiness for Agile and identify team-specific and organization-wide challenges.

    Sample of the Agile Readiness Assessment Consolidated Results blueprint deliverable.

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    Guided Implementation

    Workshop

    Consulting

    "Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful." "Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track." "We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place." "Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project."

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

    Guided Implementation

    A Guided Implementation (GI) is a series of calls with an Info-Tech analyst to help implement our best practices in your organization.

    A typical GI is between 6 to 8 calls over the course of 1 to 2 months.

    What does a typical GI on this topic look like?

      Phase 1: Distribute Survey

    • Call #1: Scope requirements, objectives, and your specific challenges (identify potential participants).
    • Call #2: First call with participants (introduce Phase 1 and assign survey for completion).
    • Call #3: Gather survey responses (prep for Phase 2 calls).
    • Phase 2: Consolidate Survey Results

    • Call #4: Consolidate all survey responses using the template.
    • Call #5: Conduct initial review of consolidated results (prep for Phase 3 calls).
    • Phase 3: Examine Results and Problem Solve

    • Call #6: Present consolidated results to participants and agree on most pressing challenges.
    • Call #7: Brainstorm, identify, and refine potential solutions to most pressing challenges.
    • Call #8: Conduct closing and communication call.

    Phase 1 — Phase 1 of 3, 'Distribute Survey'.

    Customize and distribute the survey

    Decide which teams/roles will participate in the survey.

    Decide which format and language(s) you will use for your Agile Readiness Assessment Survey.

    Configure the survey templates to reflect your selected teams/roles.

    Distribute the survey for participants to complete.

    • 1.1 The Agile Readiness Assessment Survey will help you to identify both team-specific and organization-wide challenges to your Agile transformation. It is best to distribute the survey broadly across the organization and include several teams and roles. Identify and make note of the teams/roles that will be participating in the survey.
    • 1.2 Select which format of survey you will be using (Excel or online), along with the language(s) you will use (links to the survey templates can be found in the table below). Then configure the survey templates to reflect your list of teams/roles from Step 1.1.
    • Format Language Download Survey Template
      Excel English Agile Readiness Assessment Excel Survey Template – EN and FR
      Excel French
      Online English Agile Readiness Assessment Online Survey Template – EN
      Online French Agile Readiness Assessment Online Survey Template – FR

    • 1.3 Distribute your Agile Readiness Assessment Survey broadly in the organization. Give all participants a deadline date for completion of the survey.

    Phase 2 — Phase 2 of 3, 'Consolidate Results'.

    Consolidate Survey Results

    Collect and consolidate all survey responses using the template provided.

    Review the OVERALL and DETAILED Heatmaps generated by the template.

    • 2.1 Collect the survey responses from all participants. All responses completed using the online form will be anonymous (for responses returned using the Excel form, assign each a unique identifier so that anonymity of responses is maintained).
    • 2.2 Consolidate the survey responses using the template below. Follow the instructions in the template to incorporate all survey responses.
    • Download the Agile Readiness Assessment Consolidated Results Tool

      Sample of the Agile Readiness Assessment Consolidated Results Tool, ranking maturity scores in 'Culture', 'Learning', 'Automation', 'Integrated Teams', 'Metrics', and 'Governance'.

    Phase 3 — Phase 3 of 3, 'Examine Results'.

    Examine Survey Results and Problem Solve

    Review the consolidated survey results as a team.

    Identify the challenges that need the most attention.

    Brainstorm potential solutions. Decide which are most promising and create a plan to implement them.

    • 3.1 Examine the consolidated results (both OVERALL and DETAILED Heatmaps) and look at both team-specific and organization-wide challenge areas.
    • 3.2 Identify which challenge areas need the most attention (typically those that are most red in the heatmap) and discuss these challenges with survey participants.
    • 3.3 As a team, brainstorm potential solutions to these challenges. Select from and refine the solutions that are most promising, then create a plan to implement them.

    3.1 Exercise: Collaborative Problem Solving — Phase 3 of 3, 'Examine Results'.

    60 Mins

    Input: Consolidated survey results

    Output: List of actions to address your most pressing challenges along with a timeline to implement them

    Materials: Agile Readiness Assessment Consolidated Results Tool, Whiteboard and markers

    Participants: Survey participants, Other interested parties

    This exercise will create a plan for addressing your most pressing Agile-related challenges.

    • As a team, agree on which survey challenges are most important to address (typically the most red in the heatmap).
    • Brainstorm potential solutions/actions to address these challenges.
    • Assign solutions/actions to individuals and set a timeline for completion.
    Challenge Proposed Solution Owner Timeline
    Enrichment
    lack of a CoE
    Establish a service-oriented Agile Center of Excellence (CoE) staffed with experienced Agile practitioners who can directly help new-to-Agile teams be successful. Bill W. 6 Months
    Tool Chain
    (lack of Agile tools)
    Select a standard Agile work management tool (e.g. Jira, Rally, ADO) that will be used by all Agile teams. Cindy K. 2 Months

    Related Info-Tech Research

    Sample of an Info-Tech blueprint. Modernize Your SDLC
    • Strategically adopt today’s SDLC good practices to streamline value delivery.
    Sample of an Info-Tech blueprint. Implement Agile Practices That Work
    • Guide your organization through its Agile transformation journey.
    Sample of an Info-Tech blueprint. Implement DevOps Practices That Work
    • Streamline business value delivery through the strategic adoption of DevOps practices.
    Sample of an Info-Tech blueprint. Mentoring for Agile Teams
    • Leverage an experience Agile Mentor to give your in-flight Agile project a helping hand.

    Research Contributors and Experts

    • Columbus Brown, Senior Principal – Practice Lead – Business Alignment, Daugherty Business Solutions
    • Saeed Khan, Founder, Transformation Labs
    • Brenda Peshak, Product Owner/Scrum Master/Program Manager, John Deere/Source Allies/Widget Industries LLC
    • Vincent Mirabelli, Principal, Global Project Synergy Group
    • Len O'Neill, Sr. Vice President and Chief Information Officer, The Suddath Companies
    • Shameka A. Jones, MPM, CSM, Lead Business Management Consultant, Mainspring Business Group, LLC
    • Ryland Leyton, Lead Business Analyst, Aptos Retail
    • Ashish Nangia, Lead Business System Analyst, Ashley Furniture Industries
    • Barbara Carkenord, CBAP, IIBA-AAC, PMI-PBA, PMP, SAFe POPM, President, Carkenord Consulting
    • Danelkis Serra, CBAP, Chapter Operations Manager, Regions & Chapters, IIBA (International Institute of Business Analysis)
    • Lorrie Staples-Ellis, CyberSecurity Integration Strategist, Wealth Management, Truist Bank
    • Ginger Sundberg, Independent Consultant
    • Kham Raven, Project Manager, Fraud Strategy & Execution, Truist Bank
    • Sarah Vollett, PMP, Business Analyst, Operations, College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia
    • Nicole J Coyle, ICP-ACC, CEAC, SPC4, SASM, POPM, CSM, ECM, CCMP, CAPM, Team Agile Coach and Team Facilitator, HCQIS Foundational Components
    • Joe Glower, IT Director, Jet Support Services, Inc. (JSSI)
    • Harsh Daharwal, Senior Director, Application Delivery, J.R. Simplot
    • Hans Eckman, Principal Research Director, Info-Tech Research Group
    • Valence Howden, Principal Research Director, Info-Tech Research Group

    IT Organizational Design

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}32|cart{/j2store}
    • Related Products: {j2store}32|crosssells{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.1/10
    • member rating average dollars saved: $83,392
    • member rating average days saved: 21
    • Parent Category Name: People and Resources
    • Parent Category Link: /people-and-resources

    The challenge

    • IT can ensure full business alignment through an organizational redesign.
    • Finding the best approach for your company is difficult due to many frameworks and competing priorities.
    • External competitive influences and technological trends exacerbate this.

    Our advice

    Insight

    • Your structure is the critical enabler of your strategic direction. Structure dictates how people work together and how they can fill in their roles to create the desired business value. 
    • Constant change is killing for an organization. You need to adapt, but you need a stable baseline and make sure the change is in line with the overall strategy and company context.
    • A redesign is only successful if it really happens. Shifting people into new positions is not enough to implement a redesign. 

    Impact and results 

    • Define your redesign principles. They will act as a manifesto to your change. It also provides for a checklist, ensuring that the structure does not deviate from the business strategy.
    • Visualize the new design with a customized operating model for your company. It must demonstrate how IT creates value and supports the business value creation chains.
    • Define the future-state roles, functions, and responsibilities to enable your IT department to support the business effectively.

    The roadmap

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    Get started

    Our concise executive brief explains to you the challenges associated with the organizational redesign. We'll show you our methodology and the ways we can help you in completing this.

    Define your organizational design principles and select your operating model

    The design principles will govern your organizational redesign; Align the principles with your business strategy.

    • Redesign Your IT Organizational Structure – Phase 1: Craft Organizational Design Principles and Select an IT Operating Model (ppt)
    • Organizational Design Communications Deck (ppt)

    Customize the selected IT operating model to your company

    Your operating model must account for the company's nuances and culture.

    • Redesign Your IT Organizational Structure – Phase 2: Customize the IT Operating Model (ppt)
    • Operating Models and Capability Definition List (ppt)

    Design the target-state of your IT organizational structure

    Go from an operating model to the structure fit for your company.

    • Redesign Your IT Organizational Structure – Phase 3: Architect the Target-State IT Organizational Structure (ppt)
    • Organizational Design Capability RACI Chart (xls)
    • Work Unit Reference Structures (Visio)
    • Work Unit Reference Structures (pdf)

    Communicate the benefits of the new structure

    Change does not come easy. People will be anxious. Craft your communications to address critical concerns and obtain buy-in from the organization. If the reorganization will be painful, be up-front on that, and limit the time in which people are uncertain.

    • Redesign Your IT Organizational Structure – Phase 4: Communicate the Benefits of the New Organizational Structure (ppt)

     

    Develop Meaningful Service Metrics

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}399|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.5/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $20,308 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 30 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Service Management
    • Parent Category Link: /service-management
    • IT organizations measure services from a technology perspective but rarely from a business goal or outcome perspective.
    • Most organizations do a poor job of identifying and measuring service outcomes over the duration of a service’s lifecycle – never ensuring the services remain valuable and meet expected long-term ROI.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Service metrics are critical to ensuring alignment of IT service performance and business service value achievement.
    • Service metrics reinforce positive business and end-user relationships by providing user-centric information that drives responsiveness and consistent service improvement.
    • Poorly designed metrics drive unintended and unproductive behaviors that have negative impacts on IT and produce negative service outcomes.

    Impact and Result

    Effective service metrics will provide the following service gains:

    • Confirm service performance and identify gaps.
    • Drive service improvement to maximize service value.
    • Validate performance improvements while quantifying and demonstrating business value.
    • Ensure service reporting aligns with end-user experience.
    • Achieve and confirm process and regulatory compliance.

    Which will translate into the following relationship gains:

    • Embed IT into business value achievement.
    • Improve the relationship between the business and IT.
    • Achieve higher customer satisfaction (happier end users receiving expected service, the business is able to identify how things are really performing).
    • Reinforce desirable actions and behaviors from both IT and the business.

    Develop Meaningful Service Metrics Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should develop meaningful service metrics, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    • Develop Meaningful Service Metrics – Executive Brief
    • Develop Meaningful Service Metrics – Phases 1-3

    1. Design the metrics

    Identify the appropriate service metrics based on stakeholder needs.

    • Develop Meaningful Service Metrics to Ensure Business and User Satisfaction – Phase 1: Design the Metrics
    • Metrics Development Workbook

    2. Design reports and dashboards

    Present the right metrics in the most interesting and stakeholder-centric way possible.

    • Develop Meaningful Service Metrics to Ensure Business and User Satisfaction – Phase 2: Design Reports and Dashboards
    • Metrics Presentation Format Selection Guide

    3. Implement, track, and maintain

    Run a pilot with a smaller sample of defined service metrics, then continuously validate your approach and make refinements to the processes.

    • Develop Meaningful Service Metrics to Ensure Business and User Satisfaction – Phase 3: Implement, Track, and Maintain
    • Metrics Tracking Tool
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Develop Meaningful Service Metrics

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Design the Metrics

    The Purpose

    Define stakeholder needs for IT based on their success criteria and identify IT services that are tied to the delivery of business outcomes.

    Derive meaningful service metrics based on identified IT services and validate that metrics can be collected and measured.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Design meaningful service metrics from stakeholder needs.

    Validate that metrics can be collected and measured.

    Activities

    1.1 Determine stakeholder needs, goals, and pain points.

    1.2 Determine the success criteria and related IT services.

    1.3 Derive the service metrics.

    1.4 Validate the data collection process.

    1.5 Validate metrics with stakeholders.

    Outputs

    Understand stakeholder priorities

    Adopt a business-centric perspective to align IT and business views

    Derive meaningful business metrics that are relevant to the stakeholders

    Determine if and how the identified metrics can be collected and measured

    Establish a feedback mechanism to have business stakeholders validate the meaningfulness of the metrics

    2 Design Reports and Dashboards

    The Purpose

    Determine the most appropriate presentation format based on stakeholder needs.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Ensure the metrics are presented in the most interesting and stakeholder-centric way possible to guarantee that they are read and used.

    Activities

    2.1 Understand the different presentation options.

    2.2 Assess stakeholder needs for information.

    2.3 Select and design the metric report.

    Outputs

    Learn about infographic, scorecard, formal report, and dashboard presentation options

    Determine how stakeholders would like to view information and how the metrics can be presented to aid decision making

    Select the most appropriate presentation format and create a rough draft of how the report should look

    3 Implement, Track, and Maintain Your Metrics

    The Purpose

    Run a pilot with a smaller sample of defined service metrics to validate your approach.

    Make refinements to the implementation and maintenance processes prior to activating all service metrics.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    High user acceptance and usability of the metrics.

    Processes of identifying and presenting metrics are continuously validated and improved.

    Activities

    3.1 Select the pilot metrics.

    3.2 Gather data and set initial targets.

    3.3 Generate the reports and validate with stakeholders.

    3.4 Implement the service metrics program.

    3.5 Track and maintain the metrics program.

    Outputs

    Select the metrics that should be first implemented based on urgency and impact

    Complete the service intake form for a specific initiative

    Create a process to gather data, measure baselines, and set initial targets

    Establish a process to receive feedback from the business stakeholders once the report is generated

    Identify the approach to implement the metrics program across the organization

    Set up mechanism to ensure the success of the metrics program by assessing process adherence and process validity

    Further reading

    Develop Meaningful Service Metrics

    Select IT service metrics that drive business value.

    ANALYST PERSPECTIVE

    Are you measuring and reporting what the business needs to know?

    “Service metrics are one of the key tools at IT’s disposal in articulating and ensuring its value to the business, yet metrics are rarely designed and used for that purpose.

    Creating IT service metrics directly from business and stakeholder outcomes and goals, written from the business perspective and using business language, is critical to ensuring that the services that IT provides are meeting business needs.

    The ability to measure, manage, and improve IT service performance in relation to critical business success factors, with properly designed metrics, embeds IT in the value chain of the business and ensures IT’s focus on where and how it enables business outcomes.”

    Valence Howden,
    Senior Manager, CIO Advisory
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Our understanding of the problem

    This Research Is Designed For:
    • CIO
    • IT VPs
    This Research Will Help You:
    • Align business/IT objectives (design top-down or outside-in)
    • Significantly improve the relationship between the business and IT aspects of the organization
    • Reinforce desirable actions and behaviors
    This Research Will Also Assist:
    • Service Level Managers
    • Service Owners
    • Program Owners
    This Research Will Help Them
    • Identify unusual deviations from the normal operating state
    • Drive service improvement to maximize service value
    • Validate the value of performance improvements while quantifying and demonstrating benefits realization

    Executive summary

    Situation

    • IT organizations measure services from a technology perspective yet rarely measure services from a business goal/outcome perspective.
    • Most organizations do a poor job of identifying and measuring service outcomes over the duration of a service’s lifecycle – never ensuring the services remain valuable and meet expected long-term ROI.

    Complication

    • IT organizations have difficulty identifying the right metrics to demonstrate the value of IT services to the business in tangible terms.
    • IT metrics, as currently designed, reinforce division between the IT and business perspectives of service performance. They drive siloed thinking and finger-pointing within the IT structure, and prevent IT resources from understanding how their work impacts business value.

    Resolution

    • Our program enables IT to develop the right service metrics to tie IT service performance to business value and user experience.
    • Ensure the metrics you implement have immediate stakeholder value, reinforcing alignment between IT and the business while influencing behavior in the desired direction.
    • Make sure that your metrics are defined in relation to the business goals and drivers, ensuring they will provide actionable outcomes.

    Info-Tech Insight

    1. Service metrics are critical to ensuring alignment of IT service performance and business service value achievement.
    2. Service metrics reinforce positive business and end-user relationships by providing user-centric information that drives responsiveness and consistent service improvement.
    3. Poorly designed metrics drive unintended and unproductive behaviors, which have negative impacts on IT and produce negative service outcomes.

    Service metrics 101

    What are service metrics?

    Service metrics measure IT services in a way that relates to a business outcome. IT needs to measure performance from the business perspective using business language.

    Why do we need service metrics?

    To ensure the business cares about the metrics that IT produces, start with business needs to make sure you’re measuring the right things. This will give IT the opportunity talk to the right stakeholders and develop metrics that will meet their business needs.

    Service metrics are designed with the business perspective in mind, so they are fully aligned with business objectives.

    Perspectives Matter

    Different stakeholders will require different types of metrics. A CEO may require metrics that provide a snapshot of the critical success of the company while a business manager is more concerned about the performance metrics of their department.

    What are the benefits of implementing service metrics?

    Service metrics help IT communicate with the business in business terms and enables IT to articulate how and where they provide business value. Business stakeholders can also easily understand how IT services contribute to their success.

    The majority of CIOs feel metrics relating to business value and stakeholder satisfaction require significant improvement

    A significantly higher proportion of CIOs than CEOs feel that there is significant improvement necessary for business value metrics and stakeholder satisfaction reporting. Stacked horizontal bar chart presenting survey results from CIOs and CXOs of 'Business Value Metrics'. Answer options are 'Effective', 'Some Improvement Necessary', 'Significant Improvement Necessary', and 'Not Required'.N=364

    Stacked horizontal bar chart presenting survey results from CIOs and CXOs of 'Stakeholder Satisfaction Reporting'. Answer options are 'Effective', 'Some Improvement Necessary', 'Significant Improvement Necessary', and 'Not Required'.N=364

    (Source: Info-Tech CIO-CXO Alignment Diagnostic Survey)

    Meaningless metrics are a headache for the business

    A major pitfall of many IT organizations is that they often provide pages of technical metrics that are meaningless to their business stakeholders.

    1. Too Many MetricsToo many metrics are provided and business leaders don’t know what to do with these metrics.
    2. Metrics Are Too TechnicalIT provides technical metrics that are hard to relate to business needs, and methods of calculating metrics are not clearly understood, articulated, and agreed on.
    3. Metrics Have No Business ValueService metrics are not mapped to business goals/objectives and they drive incorrect actions or spend.
    When considering only CEOs who said that stakeholder satisfaction reporting needed significant improvement, the average satisfaction score goes down to 61.6%, which is a drop in satisfaction of 12%.

    A bar that says 73% dropping to a bar that says 61%. Description above.

    (Source: Info-Tech Research Group CIO-CXO Alignment Diagnostic Survey)

    Poorly designed metrics hurt IT’s image within the organization

    By providing metrics that do not articulate the value of IT services, IT reinforces its role as a utility provider and an outsider to strategic decisions.

    When the CIOs believe business value metrics weren’t required, 50% of their CEOs said that significant improvements were necessary.

    Pie Chart presenting the survey results from CEOs regarding 'Business Value Metrics'. Description above.

    (Source: Info-Tech Research Group CIO-CXO Alignment Diagnostic Survey)
    1. Reinforce the wrong behaviorThe wrong metrics drive us-against-them, siloed thinking within IT, and meeting metric targets is prioritized over providing meaningful outcomes.
    2. Do not reflect user experienceMetrics don’t align with actual business/user experience, reinforcing a poor view of IT services.
    3. Effort ≠ ValueInvesting dedicated resources and effort to the achievement of the wrong metrics will only leave IT more constrained for other important initiatives.

    Articulate meaningful service performance that supports the achievement of business outcomes

    Service metrics measure the performance of IT services and how they enable or drive the activity outcomes.

    A business process consists of multiple business activities. In many cases, these business activities require one or more supporting IT services.

    A 'Business Process' broken down to its parts, multiple 'Business Activities' and their 'IT Services'. For each business process, business stakeholders and their goals and objectives should be identified.

    For each business activity that supports the completion of a business process, define the success criteria that must be met in order to produce the desirable outcome.

    Identify the IT services that are used by business stakeholders for each business activity. Measure the performance of these services from a business perspective to arrive at the appropriate service metrics.

    Differentiate between different types of metrics

    Stakeholders have different goals and objectives; therefore, it is critical to identify what type of metrics should be presented to each stakeholder.

    Business Metrics

    Determine Business Success

    Business metrics are derived from a pure business perspective. These are the metrics that the business stakeholders will measure themselves on, and business success is determined using these metrics.

    Arrow pointing right.

    Service Metrics

    Manage Service Value to the Business

    Service metrics are used to measure IT service performance against business outcomes. These metrics, while relating to IT services, are presented in business terms and are tied to business goals.

    Arrow pointing right.

    IT Metrics

    Enable Operational Excellence

    IT metrics are internal to the IT organization and used to manage IT service delivery. These metrics are technical, IT-specific, and drive action for IT. They are not presented to the business, and are not written in business language.

    Implementing service metrics is a key step in becoming a service provider and business partner

    As a prerequisite, IT organizations must have already established a solid relationship with the business and have a clear understanding of its critical business-facing services.

    At the very least, IT needs to have a service-oriented view and understand the specific needs and objectives associated with each stakeholder.

    Visualization of 'Business Relationship Management' with an early point on the line representing 'Service Provider: Establish service-oriented culture and business-centric service delivery', and the end of the line being 'Strategic Partner'.

    Once IT can present service metrics that the business cares about, it can continue on the service provider journey by managing the performance of services based on business needs, determine and influence service demand, and assess service value to maximize benefits to the business.

    Which processes drive service metrics?

    Both business relationship management (BRM) and service level management (SLM) provide inputs into and receive outputs from service metrics.

    Venn Diagram of 'Business Relationship Management', 'Service Metrics', and 'Service Level Management'.

    Business Relationship Management

    BRM works to understand the goals and objectives of the business and inputs them into the design of the service metrics.

    Service Metrics

    BRM leverages service metrics to help IT organizations manage the relationship with the business.

    BRM articulates and manages expectations and ensures IT services are meeting business requirements.

    Which processes drive service metrics?

    Both BRM and SLM provide inputs into and receive outputs from service metrics.

    Venn Diagram of 'Business Relationship Management', 'Service Metrics', and 'Service Level Management'.

    Service Level Management

    SLM works with the business to understand service requirements, which are key inputs in designing the service metrics.

    Service Metrics

    SLM leverages service metrics in overseeing the day-to-day delivery of IT services. It ensures they are provided to meet expected service level targets and objectives.

    Effective service metrics will deliver both service gains and relationship gains

    Effective service metrics will provide the following service gains:

    • Confirm service performance and identify gaps
    • Drive service improvement to maximize service value
    • Validate performance improvements while quantifying and demonstrating business value
    • Ensure service reporting aligns with end-user experience
    • Achieve and confirm process and regulatory compliance
        Which will translate into the following relationship gains:
        • Embed IT into business value achievement
        • Improve relationship between the business and IT
        • Achieve higher customer satisfaction (happier end users receiving expected service, the business is able to identify how things are really performing)
        • Reinforce desirable actions and behaviors from both IT and the business

    Don’t let conventional wisdom become your roadblock

    Conventional Wisdom

    Info-Tech Perspective

    Metrics are measured from an application or technology perspective Metrics need to be derived from a service and business outcome perspective.
    The business doesn’t care about metrics Metrics are not usually designed to speak in business terms about business outcomes. Linking metrics to business objectives creates metrics that the business cares about.
    It is difficult to have a metrics discussion with the business It is not a metrics/number discussion, it is a discussion on goals and outcomes.
    Metrics are only presented for the implementation of the service, not the ongoing outcome of the service IT needs to focus on service outcome and not project outcome.
    Quality can’t be measured Quality must be measured in order to properly manage services.

    Our three-phase approach to service metrics development

    Let Info-Tech guide you through your service metrics journey

    1

    2

    3

    Design Your Metrics Develop and Validate Reporting Implement, Track, and Maintain
    Sample of Phase 1 of Info-Tech's service metric development package, 'Design Your Metrics'. Sample of Phase 2 of Info-Tech's service metric development package, 'Develop and Validate Reporting'. Sample of Phase 3 of Info-Tech's service metric development package, 'Implement, Track, and Maintain'.
    Start the development and creation of your service metrics by keeping business perspectives in mind, so they are fully aligned with business objectives. Identify the most appropriate presentation format based on stakeholder preference and need for metrics. Track goals and success metrics for your service metrics programs. It allows you to set long-term goals and track your results over time.

    CIOs must actively lead the design of the service metrics program

    The CIO must actively demonstrate support for the service metrics program and lead the initial discussions to determine what matters to business leaders.

    1. Lead the initiative by defining the need
      Show visible support and demonstrate importance
    2. Articulate the value to both IT and the business
      Establish the urgency and benefits
    3. Select and assemble an implementation group
      Find the best people to get the job done
    4. Drive initial metrics discussions: goals, objectives, actions
      Lead brainstorming with senior business leaders
    5. Work with the team to determine presentation formats and communication methods
      Identify the best presentation approach for senior stakeholders
    6. Establish a feedback loop for senior management
      Solicit feedback on improvements
    7. Validate the success of the metrics
      Confirm service metrics support business outcomes

    Measure the success of your service metrics

    It is critical to determine if the designed service metrics are fulfilling their intended purpose. The process of maintaining the service metrics program and the outcomes of implementing service metrics need to be monitored and tracked.

    Validating Service Metrics Design

    Target Outcome

    Related Metrics

    The business is enabled to identify and improve service performance to their end customer # of improvement initiatives created based on service metrics
    $ cost savings/revenue generated due to actions derived from service metrics

    Procedure to validate the usefulness of IT metrics

    # / % of service metrics added/removed per year

    Alignment between IT and business objectives and processes Business’ satisfaction with IT

    Measure the success of your service metrics

    It is critical to determine if the designed service metrics are fulfilling their intended purpose. The process of maintaining the service metrics program and the outcomes of implementing service metrics need to be monitored and tracked.

    Validating Service Metrics Process

    Target Outcome

    Related Metrics

    Properly defined service metrics aligned with business goals/outcomes
    Easy understood measurement methodologies
    % of services with (or without) defined service metrics

    % of service metrics tied to business goals

    Consistent approach to review and adjust metrics# of service metrics adjusted based on service reviews

    % of service metrics reviewed on schedule

    Demonstrate monetary value and impact through the service metrics program

    In a study done by the Aberdeen Group, organizations engaged in the use of metrics benchmarking and measurement have:
    • 88% customer satisfaction rate
    • 60% service profitability
    • 15% increase in workforce productivity over the last 12 months

    Stock image of a silhouette of three people's head and shoulders.
    (Source: Aberdeen Group. “Service Benchmarking and Measurement.”)

    A service metric is defined for: “Response time for Business Application A

    The expected response time has not been achieved and this is visible in the service metrics. The reduced performance has been identified as having an impact of $250,000 per month in lost revenue potential.

    The service metric drove an action to perform a root-cause analysis, which identified a network switch issue and drove a resolution action to fix the technology and architect redundancy to ensure continuity.

    The fix eliminated the performance impact, allowing for recovery of the $250K per month in revenue, improved end-user confidence in the organization, and increased use of the application, creating additional revenue.

    Implementing and measuring a video conferencing service

    CASE STUDY
    Industry: Manufacturing | Source: CIO interview and case material
    Situation

    The manufacturing business operates within numerous countries and requires a lot of coordination of functions and governance oversight. The company has monthly meetings, both regional and national, and key management and executives travel to attend and participate in the meetings.

    Complication

    While the meetings provide a lot of organizational value, the business has grown significantly and the cost of business travel has started to become prohibitive.

    Action

    It was decided that only a few core meetings would require onsite face-to-face meetings, and for all other meetings, the company would look at alternative means. The face-to-face aspect of the meetings was still considered critical so they focused on options to retain that aspect.

    The IT organization identified that they could provide a video conferencing service to meet the business need. The initiative was approved and rolled out in the organization.

    Result:

    IT service metrics needed to be designed to confirm that the expected value outcome of the implementation of video conferencing was achieved.

    Under the direction of the CIO, the business goals and needs driving use of the service (i.e. reduction in travel costs, efficiency, no loss of positive outcome) were used to identify success criteria and key questions to confirm success.

    With this information, the service manager was able to implement relevant service metrics in business language and confirmed an 80% adoption rate and a 95% success rate in term meetings running as expected and achieving core outcomes.

    Use these icons to help direct you as you navigate this research

    Use these icons to help guide you through each step of the blueprint and direct you to content related to the recommended activities.

    A small monochrome icon of a wrench and screwdriver creating an X.

    This icon denotes a slide where a supporting Info-Tech tool or template will help you perform the activity or step associated with the slide. Refer to the supporting tool or template to get the best results and proceed to the next step of the project.

    A small monochrome icon depicting a person in front of a blank slide.

    This icon denotes a slide with an associated activity. The activity can be performed either as part of your project or with the support of Info-Tech team members, who will come onsite to facilitate a workshop for your organization.

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    Guided Implementation

    Workshop

    Consulting

    "Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful." "Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track." "We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place." "Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project."

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

    Develop meaningful service metrics to ensure business and user satisfaction

    1. Design the Metrics 2. Design Reports and Dashboards 3. Implement, Track, and Maintain
    Supporting Tool icon

    Best-Practice Toolkit

    1. Defining stakeholder needs for IT based on their success criteria
    2. Derive meaningful service metrics based on identified IT services and validate with business stakeholders
    3. Validate metrics can be collected and measured
    4. Determine calculation methodology
    1. Presentation format selected based on stakeholder needs and preference for information
    2. Presentation format validated with stakeholders
    1. Identify metrics that will be presented first to the stakeholders based on urgency or impact of the IT service
    2. Determine the process to collect data, select initial targets, and integrate with SLM and BRM functions
    3. Roll out the metrics implementation for a broader audience
    4. Establish roles and timelines for metrics maintenance

    Guided Implementations

    • Design metrics based on business needs
    • Validate the metrics
    • Select presentation format
    • Review metrics presentation design
    • Select and implement pilot metrics
    • Determine rollout process and establish maintenance/tracking mechanism
    Associated Activity icon

    Onsite Workshop

    Module 1:
    Derive Service Metrics From Business Goals
    Module 2:
    Select and Design Reports and Dashboards
    Module 3:
    Implement, Track, and Maintain Your Metrics to Ensure Success
    Phase 1 Outcome:
    • Meaningful service metrics designed from stakeholder needs
    Phase 2 Outcome:
    • Appropriate presentation format selected for each stakeholder
    Phase 3 Outcome:
    • Metrics implemented and process established to maintain and track program success

    Workshop overview

    Contact your account representative or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.
    Workshop Day 1 Workshop Day 2 Workshop Day 3 Workshop Day 4
    Design the Metrics
    Determine Presentation Format and Implement Metrics
    Gather Service Level Requirements
    Monitor and Improve Service Levels

    Activities

    • 1.1 Determine stakeholder needs
    • 1.2 Determine success criteria and key performance indicators
    • 1.3 Derive metrics
    • 1.4 Validate the metric collection
    • 2.1 Discuss stakeholder needs/preference for data and select presentation format
    • 2.2 Select and design the metric report
    • Requirements
    • 3.1 Determine the business requirements
    • 3.2 Negotiate service levels
    • 3.3 Align operational level agreements (OLAs) and supplier contracts
    • 4.1 Conduct service report and perform service review
    • 4.2 Communicate service review
    • 4.3 Remediate issues using action plan
    • 4.4 Proactive prevention

    Deliverables

    1. Metrics Development Workbook
    1. Metrics Presentation Format Selection Guide
    2. Metrics Tracking Tool
    1. Service Level Management SOP
    2. Service Level Agreement
    1. Service Level Report
    2. Service Level Review
    3. Business Satisfaction Report

    Develop Meaningful Service Metrics to Ensure Business and User Satisfaction

    PHASE 1

    Design the Metrics

    Step (1): Design the Metrics

    PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3

    1.1

    Derive the Service Metrics

    1.2

    Validate the Metrics

    2.1

    Determine Reporting Format

    3.1

    Select Pilot Metrics

    3.2

    Activate and Maintain Metrics

    This step involves the following participants:

    • CIO
    • Business Relationship Manager (BRM)
    • Service Level Manager (SLM)

    Outcomes of this step

    • Defined stakeholder needs for IT based on their success criteria
    • Identified IT services that are tied to the delivery of business outcomes
    • Derived meaningful service metrics based on identified IT services and validated with business stakeholders
    • Validated that metrics can be collected and measured
    • Determined calculation methodology

    Phase 1 outline

    Associated Activity icon Call 1-888-670-8889 or email GuidedImplementations@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Complete these steps on your own, or call us to complete a guided implementation. A guided implementation is a series of 2-3 advisory calls that help you execute each phase of a project. They are included in most advisory memberships.

    Guided Implementation 1: Design the Metrics

    Proposed Time to Completion (in weeks): 4 weeks
    Step 1.1: Design Metrics Step 1.2: Validate the Metrics
    Start with an analyst kick-off call:
    • Determine the stakeholder and their needs
    • Identify IT services that are tied to the delivery of business outcomes
    • Derive the service metrics
    Review findings with analyst:
    • For the selected metrics, identify the data source for collection
    • Validate whether or not the data can be created
    • Create a calculation method for the metrics
    Then complete these activities…
    • Using the methodology provided, identify additional stakeholders and map out their success criteria, including KPIs to determine the appropriate service metrics
    Then complete these activities…
    • Determine whether the designed metrics are measurable, and if so, how
    With these tools & templates:
    • Metrics Development Workbook
    With these tools & templates:
    • Metrics Development Workbook

    Design your service metrics – overview

    Figure representing 'CIO'. Step 1
    Derive your service metrics

    Metrics Worksheet

    Figure representing 'SLM' and/or 'BRM'. Step 2
    Validate your metrics

    Metrics Worksheet

    Figures representing 'CIO', 'SLM', and/or 'BRM'. Step 3
    Confirm with stakeholders

    Metrics Tracking Sheet

    A star.

    Defined IT Service Metrics

    Deriving the right metrics is critical to ensuring that you will generate valuable and actionable service metrics.

    Derive your service metrics from business objectives and needs

    Service metrics must be designed with the business perspective in mind so they are fully aligned with business objectives.

    Thus, IT must start by identifying specific stakeholder needs. The more IT understands about the business, the more relevant the metrics will be to the business stakeholders.

    1. Who are your stakeholders?
    2. What are their goals and pain points?
    3. What do the stakeholders need to know?
    4. What do I need to measure?
    5. Derive your service metrics

    Derive your service metrics

    Supporting Tool icon 1.1 Metrics Development Workbook

    This workbook guides the development and creation of service metrics that are directly tied to stakeholder needs.

    This process will ensure that your service metrics are designed with the business perspective in mind so they are fully aligned with business objectives.

    1. Who are the relevant stakeholders?
    2. What are the goals and pain points of your stakeholders?
    3. What do the stakeholders need to know?
    4. What does IT need to measure?
    5. What are the appropriate IT metrics?

    Download the Metrics Development Workbook.

    Sample of Info-Tech's Metrics Development Workbook.

    Determine your stakeholders

    Supporting Tool icon 1.1 0.5 Hour

    Who are your stakeholders?

    1. Identify the primary stakeholders of your service metrics. Stakeholders are the people who have a very specific need to know about how IT services affect their business outcomes. Different stakeholders can have different perspective on the same IT service metric.Most often, the primary target of service metrics are the business stakeholders, e.g. VP of a business unit.
    2. Identify any additional stakeholders. The CIO is also a stakeholder since they are effectively the business relationship manager for the senior leaders.

    Video Conferencing Case Study
    Manufacturing company

    For this phase, we will demonstrate how to derive the service metrics by going through the steps in the methodology.

    At a manufacturing company, the CIO’s main stakeholder is the CEO, whose chief concern is to improve the financial position of the company.

    Identify goals and pain points of your stakeholders

    Supporting Tool icon 1.2 0.5 Hour

    What are their goals and pain points?

    1. Clearly identify each stakeholder’s business goals and outcomes. These would be particular business goals related to a specific business unit.
    2. Identify particular pain points for each business unit to understand what is preventing them from achieving the desirable business outcome.

    VC Case Study

    One of the top initiatives identified by the company to improve financial performance was to reduce expense.

    Because the company has several key locations in different states, company executives used to travel extensively to carry out meetings at each location.

    Therefore, travel expenses represent a significant proportion of operational expenses and reducing travel costs is a key goal for the company’s executives.

    What do the stakeholders need to know?

    Supporting Tool icon 1.3 0.5 Hour

    What do the stakeholders need to know?

    1. Identify the key things that the stakeholders would need to know based on the goals and pain points derived from the previous step.These are your success criteria and must be met to successfully achieve the desired goals.

    VC Case Study

    The CEO needs to have assurance that without executives traveling to each location, remote meetings can be as effective as in-person meetings.

    These meetings must provide the same outcome and allow executives to collaborate and make similar strategic decisions without the onsite, physical presence.

    Therefore, the success criteria are:

    • Reduced travel costs
    • Effective collaboration
    • High-quality meetings

    What do I need to measure?

    Supporting Tool icon 1.4 1 Hour

    What does IT need to measure?

    1. Identify the IT services that are leveraged to achieve the business goals and success criteria.
    2. Identify the users of those services and determine the nature of usage for each group of users.
    3. Identify the key indicators that must be measured for those services from an IT perspective.

    VC Case Study

    The IT department decides to implement the video conferencing service to reduce the number of onsite meetings. This technology would allow executives to meet remotely with both audio and video and is the best option to replicate a physical meeting.

    The service is initially available to senior executives and will be rolled out to all internal users once the initial implementation is deemed successful.

    To determine the success of the service, the following needs to be measured:

    1. Outcomes of VC meetings
    2. Quality of the VC meetings
    3. Reduction in travel expenses

    Derive service metrics

    Supporting Tool icon 1.5 0.5 Hour

    Derive your service metrics

    1. Derive the service metrics that are meaningful to business stakeholders based on the IT services and the key indicators identified in the previous steps.
    2. Distinguish between service metrics and business metrics. You may identify some business metrics in addition to the IT metrics, and although these are important, IT doesn’t own the process of tracking and reporting business metrics.

    VC Case Study

    In the previous step, IT identified that it must measure the outcomes of VC meetings, quality of the VC meetings, and the reduction in travel expenses. From these, the appropriate service metrics can be derived to answer the needs of the CEO.

    IT needs to measure:

    1. Percent of VC meetings successfully delivered
    2. Growth of number of executive meetings conducted via VC
    Outcomes

    IT also identified the following business metrics:

    1. Reduction in percent of travel expense/spend
    2. Reduction in lost time due to travel

    Validate your metrics

    Once appropriate service metrics are derived from business objectives, the next step is to determine whether or not it is viable to actually measure the metrics.

    Can you measure it? The first question IT must answer is whether the metric is measurable. IT must identify the data source, validate its ability to collect the data, and specify the data requirement. Not all metrics can be measured!
    How will you measure it? If the metric is measurable, the next step is to create a way to measure the actual data. In most cases, simple formulas that can be easily understood are the best approach.
    Define your actions Metrics must be used to drive or reinforce desirable outcomes and behaviors. Thus, IT must predetermine the necessary actions associated with the different metric levels, thresholds, or trends.

    Determine if you can measure the identified metric

    Supporting Tool icon 1.6 0.5 Hour

    INSTRUCTIONS

    1. Determine what data sources are available. Make sure that you know where the information you need is captured, or will need to be captured. This would include:
      • A ticket/request system
      • An auto discovery tool
      • A configuration management database ( CMDB)
    2. Confirm that IT has the ability to collect the information.
      • If the necessary data is already contained in an identified data source, then you can proceed.
      • If not, consider whether it’s possible to gather the information using current sources and systems.
      • Understand the constraints and cost/ROI to implement new technology or revise processes and data gathering to produce the data.

    VC Case Study

    Using the metric derived from the video conferencing service example, IT wants to measure the % of VC meetings successfully delivered.

    What are the data sources?

    • Number of VC meetings that took place
    • Number of service incidents
    • User survey

    Determine if you can measure the identified metric

    Supporting Tool icon 1.6 0.5 Hour

    INSTRUCTIONS

    1. Understand your data requirements
      • To produce relevant metrics from your data, you need to ensure the level of quality and currency that provides you with useful information. You need to define:
        • The level of detail that has to be captured to make the data useful.
        • The consistency of the data, and how it needs to be entered or gathered.
        • The accuracy of the data. This includes how current the data needs to be, how quickly changes have to be made, and how data quality will be verified.

    VC Case Study

    Data requirement for percent of successful VC meetings:

    • Level of detail – user category, location, date/time,
    • Consistency – how efficiently are VC-related incidents opened and closed? Is the data collected and stored consistently?
    • Accuracy – is the information entered accurately?

    Create the calculation to measure it

    Supporting Tool icon 1.7 0.5 Hour

    Determine how to calculate the metrics.

    INSTRUCTIONS
    1. Develop the calculations that will be used for each accepted metric. The measurement needs to be clear and straightforward.
    2. Define the scope and assumptions for each calculation, including:
      • The defined measurement period (e.g. monthly, weekly)
      • Exclusions (e.g. nonbusiness hours, during maintenance windows)

    VC Case Study

    Metric: Percent of VC meetings delivered successfully

    IT is able to determine the total number of VC meetings that took place and the number of VC service requests to the help desk.

    That makes it possible to use the following formula to determine the success percentage of the VC service:

    ((total # VC) – (# of VC with identified incidents)) / (total # VC) * 100

    Define the actions to be taken for each metric

    Supporting Tool icon 1.7 1.5 Hour

    INSTRUCTIONS

    Centered on the defined metrics and their calculations, IT can decide on the actions that should be driven out of each metric based on one of the following scenarios:
    • Scenario 1: Ad hoc remedial action and root-cause investigation. If the reason for the result is unknown, determining root cause or identifying trends is required to determine required actions.
    • Scenario 2: Predefined remedial action. A set of predetermined actions associated with different results. This is useful when the meaning of the results is clear and points to specific issues within the environment.
    • Scenario 3: Nonremedial action. The metrics may produce a result that reinforces or supports company direction and strategy, or identifies an opportunity that may drive a new initiative or idea.

    VC Case Study

    If the success rate of the VC meetings is below 90%, IT needs to focus on determining if there is a common cause and identify if this is a consistent downward trend.

    A root-cause analysis is performed that identifies that network issues are causing difficulties, impacting the connection quality and usability of the VC service.

    Validate the confirmed metrics with the business

    Supporting Tool icon 1.8 1 Hour

    INPUT: Selected service metrics, Discussion with the business

    OUTPUT: Validated metrics with the business

    Materials: Metrics with calculation methodology

    Participants: IT and business stakeholders, Service owners

    INSTRUCTIONS

    1. Once you have derived the appropriate metrics and established that the metrics are measurable, you must go back to the targeted stakeholders and validate that the selected metrics will provide the right information to meet their identified goals and success criteria.
    2. Add confirmed metrics to the Metrics Tracking Tool, in the Metrics Tracking Plan tab.
    Service Metric Corresponding
    Business Goal
    Measurement
    Method
    Defined Actions

    Example: Measuring the online banking service at a financial institution

    Who are IT’s stakeholders? The financial institution provides various banking solutions to its customers. Retail banking is a core service offered by the bank and the VP of retail banking is a major stakeholder of IT.
    What are their goals and pain points? The VP of retail banking’s highest priorities are to increase revenue, increase market share, and maintain the bank’s brand and reputation amongst its customers.
    What do they need to know? In order to measure success, the VP of retail banking needs to determine performance in attracting new clients, retaining clients, expanding into new territory, and whether they have increased the number of services provided to existing clients.
    What does IT need to measure? The recent implementation of an online banking service is a key initiative that will keep the bank competitive and help retail banking meet its goals. The key indicators of this service are: the total number of clients, the number of products per client, percent of clients using online banking, number of clients by segment, service, territory.
    Derive the service metrics Based on the key indicators, IT can derive the following service metrics:
    1. Number of product applications originated from online banking
    2. Customer satisfaction/complaints
    As part of the process, IT also identified some business metrics, such as the number of online banking users per month or the number of times a client accesses online banking per month.

    Design service metrics to track service performance and value

    CASE STUDY
    Industry: Manufacturing | Source: CIO
    Challenge Solution Results
    The IT organization needed to generate metrics to show the business whether the video conferencing service was being adopted and if it was providing the expected outcome and value.

    Standard IT metrics were technical and did not provide a business context that allowed for easy understanding of performance and decision making.

    The IT organization, working through the CIO and service managers, sat down with the key business stakeholders of the video conferencing service.

    They discussed the goals for the meeting and defined the success criteria for those goals in the context of video conference meeting outcomes.

    The success criteria that were discussed were then translated into a set of questions (key performance indicators) that if answered, would show that the success criteria were achieved.

    The service manager identified what could be measured to answer the defined questions and eliminated any metrics that were either business metrics or non-IT related.

    The remaining metrics were identified as the possible service metrics, and the ability to gather the information and produce the metric was confirmed.

    Service metrics were defined for:

    1. Percent of video conference meetings delivered successfully
    2. Growth in the number of executive meetings conducted via video conference

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech Workshop Associated Activity icon

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    Photo of Valence Howden, Senior Manager, CIO Advisory, Info-Tech Research Group.
    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analyst will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech's historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    1.1

    Sample of activity 1.1 'Determine your stakeholders'. Determine stakeholder needs, goals, and pain points

    The onsite analyst will help you select key stakeholders and analyze their business objectives and current pain points.

    1.2

    Sample of activity 1.2 'Identify goals and pain points of your stakeholders'. Determine the success criteria and related IT services

    The analyst will facilitate a discussion to uncover the information that these stakeholders care about. The group will also identify the IT services that are supporting these objectives.

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech Workshop Associated Activity icon

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    1.5

    Sample of activity 1.5 'Derive service metrics'. Derive the service metrics

    Based on the key performance indicators obtained in the previous page, derive meaningful business metrics that are relevant to the stakeholders.

    1.6

    Sample of activity 1.6 'Determine if you can measure the identified metric'. Validate the data collection process

    The analyst will help the workshop group determine whether the identified metrics can be collected and measured. If so, a calculation methodology is created.

    1.7

    Sample of activity 1.7 'Create the caluclation to measure it'. Validate metrics with stakeholders

    Establish a feedback mechanism to have business stakeholders validate the meaningfulness of the metrics.

    Develop Meaningful Service Metrics to Ensure Business and User Satisfaction

    PHASE 2

    Design Reports and Dashboards

    Step (2): Design Reports and Dashboards

    PHASE 1PHASE 2PHASE 3

    1.1

    Derive the Service Metrics

    1.2

    Validate the Metrics

    2.1

    Determine Reporting Format

    3.1

    Select Pilot Metrics

    3.2

    Activate and Maintain Metrics

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Business Relationship Manager
    • Service Level Manager
    • Business Stakeholders

    Outcomes of this step

    • Presentation format selected based on stakeholder needs and preference for information
    • Presentation format validated with stakeholders

    Phase 2 outline

    Associated Activity icon Call 1-888-670-8889 or email GuidedImplementations@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Complete these steps on your own, or call us to complete a guided implementation. A guided implementation is a series of 2-3 advisory calls that help you execute each phase of a project. They are included in most advisory memberships.

    Guided Implementation 2: Design Reports and Dashboards

    Proposed Time to Completion (in weeks): 3 weeks
    Step 2.1: Select Presentation Format Step 2.2: Review Design
    Start with an analyst kick-off call:
    • Review the different format of metrics presentation and discuss the pros/cons of each format
    • Discuss stakeholder needs/preference for data
    • Select the presentation format
    Review findings with analyst:
    • Discuss stakeholder feedback based on selected presentation format
    • Modify and adjust the presentation format as needed
    Then complete these activities…
    • Design the metrics using the selected format
    Then complete these activities…
    • Finalize the design for metrics presentation
    With these tools & templates:
    • Metrics Presentation Format Selection Guide
    With these tools & templates:
    • Metrics Presentation Format Selection Guide

    Design the reports – overview

    Figure representing 'SLM' and/or 'BRM'. Step 1
    Understand the pros and cons of different reporting styles
    Figure representing 'SLM' and/or 'BRM'. Step 2
    Determine your reporting and presentation style

    Presentation Format Selection

    Figure representing 'SLM' and/or 'BRM'. Step 3
    Design your metrics reports
    A star.

    Validated Service Reports

    The design of service metrics reporting is critically important. The reporting style must present the right information in the most interesting and stakeholder-centric way possible to ensure that it is read and used.

    The reports must also display information in a way that generates actions. If your stakeholders cannot make decisions, kick off activities, or ask questions based on your reports, then they have no value.

    Determine the right presentation format for your metrics

    Most often, metrics are presented in the following ways:

    Dashboard
    (PwC. “Mega-Trends and Implications.”)
    Sample of the 'Dashboard' metric presentation format.
    Infographic
    (PwC. “Healthcare’s new entrants.”)
    Sample of the 'Infographic' metric presentation format.
    Report
    (PwC Blogs. “Northern Lights.”)
    Sample of the 'Report' metric presentation format.
    Scorecard
    (PwC. “Annual Report 2015.”)
    Sample of the 'Scorecard' metric presentation format.

    Understand the advantages and disadvantages of each reporting style – Dashboard

    A dashboard is a reporting method that provides a dynamic at-a-glance view of key metrics from the perspective of key stakeholders. It provides a quick graphical way to process important performance information in real time.

    Features

    Typically web-based

    Dynamic data that is updated in real time

    Advantage

    Aggregates a lot of information into a single view

    Presents metrics in a simplistic style that is well understood

    Provides a quick point-in-time view of performance

    Easy to consume visual presentation style

    Disadvantage

    Complicated to set up well.
    Requires additional technology support: programming, API, etc.

    Promotes a short-term outlook – focus on now, no historical performance and no future trends. Doesn’t provide the whole picture and story.

    Existing dashboard tools are often not customized enough to provide real value to each stakeholder.

    Dashboards present real-time metrics that can be accessed and viewed at any time

    Sample of the 'Dashboard' metric presentation format.
    (Source: PwC. “Mega-Trends and Implications.”)
    Metrics presented through online dashboards are calculated in real time, which allows for a dynamic, current view into the performance of IT services at any time.

    Understand the advantages and disadvantages of each reporting style – Infographic

    An infographic is a graphical representation of metrics or data, which is used to show information quickly and clearly. It’s based on the understanding that people retain and process visual information more readily than written details.

    Features

    Turns dry into attractive –transforms data into eye-catching visual memory that is easier to retain

    Can be used as the intro to a formal report

    There are endless types of infographics

    Advantage

    Easily consumable

    Easy to retain

    Eye catching

    Easily shared

    Spurs conversation

    Customizable

    Disadvantage

    Require design expertise and resources

    Can be time consuming to generate

    Could be easily misinterpreted

    Message can be lost with poor design

    Infographics allow for completely unique designs

    Sample of the 'Infographic' metric presentation format.
    (Source: PwC. “Healthcare’s new entrants…”)
    There is no limit when it comes to designing an infographic. The image used here visually articulates the effects of new entrants pulling away the market.

    Understand the advantages and disadvantages of each reporting style – Formal Report

    A formal report is a more structured and official reporting style that contains detailed research, data, and information required to enable specific business decisions, and to help evaluate performance over a defined period of time.

    Definition

    Metrics can be presented as a component of a periodic, formal report

    A physical document that presents detailed information to a particular audience

    Advantage

    More detailed, more structured and broader reporting period

    Formal, shows IT has put in the effort

    Effectively presents a broader and more complete story

    Targets different stakeholders at the same time

    Disadvantage

    Requires significant effort and resources

    Higher risk if the report does not meet the expectation of the business stakeholder

    Done at a specific time and only valuable for that specific time period

    Harder to change format

    Formal reports provide a detailed view and analysis of performance

    Sample of the 'Formal Report' metric presentation format.
    (Source: PwC Blogs. “Northern Lights: Where are we now?”)
    An effective report incorporates visuals to demonstrate key improvements.

    Formal reports can still contain visuals, but they are accompanied with detailed explanations.

    Understand the advantages and disadvantages of each reporting style – Scorecard

    A scorecard is a graphic view of the progress and performance over time of key performance metrics. These are in relation to specified goals based on identified critical stakeholder objectives.

    Features

    Incorporates multiple metrics effectively.

    Scores services against the most important organizational goals and objectives. Scorecards may tie back into strategy and different perspectives of success.

    Advantage

    Quick view of performance against objectives

    Measure against a set of consistent objectives

    Easily consumable

    Easy to retain

    Disadvantage

    Requires a lot of forethought

    Scorecards provide a time-bound summary of performance against defined goals

    Sample of the 'Scorecard' metric presentation format.
    (PwC. “Annual Report 2015.”)
    Scorecards provide a summary of performance that is directly linked to the organizational KPIs.

    Determine your report style

    Supporting Tool icon 2.1 Metrics Presentation Format Selection Guide

    In this section, you will determine the optimal reporting style for the service metrics.

    This guide contains four questions, which will help IT organizations identify the most appropriate presentation format based on stakeholder preference and needs for metrics.

    1. Who is the relevant stakeholder?
    2. What are the defined actions for the metric?
    3. How frequently does the stakeholder need to see the metric?
    4. How does the stakeholder like to receive information?
    Sample of Info-Tech's Metrics Presentation Format Selection Guide.
    Download the Metrics Presentation Format Selection Guide.

    Determine your best presentation option

    Supporting Tool icon 2.1 2 Hours

    INPUT: Identified stakeholder and his/her role

    OUTPUT: Proper presentation format based on need for information

    Materials: Metrics Presentation Format Selection Guide

    Participants: BRM, SLM, Program Manager

    After deciding on the report type to be used to present the metric, the organization needs to consider how stakeholders will consume the metric.

    There are three options based on stakeholder needs and available presentation options within IT.

    1. Paper-based presentation is the most traditional form of reporting and works well with stakeholders who prefer physical copies. The report is produced at a specific time and requires no additional IT capability.
    2. Online documents stored on webpages, SharePoint, or another knowledge management system could be used to present the metrics. This allows the report to be linked to other information and easily shared.
    3. Online dashboards and graphics can be used to have dynamic, real-time reporting and anytime access. These webpages can be incorporated into an intranet and allow the user to view the metrics at any time. This will require IT to continuously update the data in order to maintain the accuracy of the metrics.

    Design your metric reports with these guidelines in mind

    Supporting Tool icon 2.2 30 Minutes
    1. Stakeholder-specificThe report must be driven by the identified stakeholder needs and preferences and articulate the metrics that are important to them.
    2. ClarityTo enable decision making and drive desired actions, the metrics must be clear and straightforward. They must be presented in a way that clearly links the performance measurement to the defined outcome without leading to different interpretations of the results.
    3. SimplicityThe report must be simple to read, understand, and analyze. The language of the report must be business-centric and remove as much complexity as possible in wording, imaging, and context.

    Be sure to consider access rights for more senior reports. Site and user access permissions may need to be defined based on the level of reporting.

    Metrics reporting on the video conferencing service

    CASE STUDY
    Industry: Manufacturing | Source: CIO Interview
    The Situation

    The business had a clear need to understand if the implementation of video conferencing would allow previously onsite meetings to achieve the same level of effectiveness.

    Reporting Context

    Provided reports had always been generated from an IT perspective and the business rarely used the information to make decisions.

    The metrics needed to help the business understand if the meetings were remaining effective and be tied into the financial reporting against travel expenses, but there would be limited visibility during the executive meetings.

    Approach

    The service manager reviewed the information that he had gathered to confirm how often they needed information related to the service. He also met with the CIO to get some insight into the reports that were already being provided to the business, including the ones that were most effective.

    Considerations

    The conversations identified that there was no need for a dynamic real-time view of the performance of the service, since tracking of cost savings and utility would be viewed monthly and quarterly. They also identified that the item would be discussed within a very small window of time during the management meetings.

    The Solution

    It was determined that the best style of reporting for the metric was an existing scorecard that was produced monthly, using some infographics to ensure that the information is clear at a glance to enable quick decision making.

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech Workshop Associated Activity icon

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    Photo of Valence Howden, Senior Manager, CIO Advisory, Info-Tech Research Group.
    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analyst will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech's historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    2.1

    Sample of presentation format option slide 'Determine the right presentation format for your metrics'. Understand the different presentation options

    The onsite analyst will introduce the group to the communication vehicles of infographic, scorecard, formal report, and dashboard.

    2.1

    Sample of activity 2.1 'Determine your best presentation option'. Assess stakeholder needs for information

    For selected stakeholders, the analyst will facilitate a discussion on how stakeholders would like to view information and how the metrics can be presented to aid decision making.

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech Workshop Associated Activity icon

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    2.2

    Sample of activity 2.2 'Design your metric reports with these guidelines in mind'. Select and design the metric report

    Based on the discussion, the working group will select the most appropriate presentation format and create a rough draft of how the report should look.

    Develop Meaningful Service Metrics to Ensure Business and User Satisfaction

    PHASE 3

    Implement, Track, and Maintain Your Metrics

    Step (3): Implement, Track, and Maintain Your Metrics

    PHASE 1PHASE 2PHASE 3

    1.1

    Derive the Service Metrics

    1.2

    Validate the Metrics

    2.1

    Determine Reporting Format

    3.1

    Select Pilot Metrics

    3.2

    Activate and Maintain Metrics

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Service Level Manager
    • Business Relationship Manager
    • Service Metrics Program Manager

    Activities in this step

    • Determine the first batch of metrics to be implemented as part of the pilot program
    • Create a process to collect and validate data, determine initial targets, and integrate with SLM and BRM functions
    • Present the metric reports to the relevant stakeholders and incorporate the feedback into the metric design
    • Establish a standard process and roll out the implementation of metrics in batches
    • Establish a process to monitor and track the effectiveness of the service metrics program and make adjustments when necessary

    Phase 3 outline

    Associated Activity icon Call 1-888-670-8889 or email GuidedImplementations@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Complete these steps on your own, or call us to complete a guided implementation. A guided implementation is a series of 2-3 advisory calls that help you execute each phase of a project. They are included in most advisory memberships.

    Guided Implementation 3: Implement, Track, and Maintain Your Metrics

    Proposed Time to Completion (in weeks): 4 weeks
    Step 3.1: Select and Launch Pilot Metrics Step 3.2: Track and Maintain the Metrics
    Start with an analyst kick-off call:
    • Identify metrics that will be presented first to the stakeholders based on urgency or impact of the IT service
    • Determine the process to collect data, select initial targets, and integrate with SLM and BRM functions
    Review findings with analyst:
    • Review the success of metrics and discuss feedback from stakeholders
    • Roll out the metrics implementation to a broader audience
    • Establish roles and timelines for metrics maintenance
    Then complete these activities…
    • Document the first batch of metrics
    • Document the baseline, initial targets
    • Create a plan to integrate with SLM and BRM functions
    Then complete these activities…
    • Create a document that defines how the organization will track and maintain the success of the metrics program
    • Review the metrics program periodically
    With these tools & templates:
    • Metrics Tracking Tool
    With these tools & templates:
    • Metrics Tracking Tool

    Implement, Track, and Maintain the Metrics

    Figure representing 'SLM' and/or 'BRM'. Step 1
    Run your pilot

    Metrics Tracking Tool

    Figure representing 'SLM' and/or 'BRM'. Step 2
    Validate success

    Metrics Tracking Tool

    Figure representing 'SLM' and/or 'BRM'. Step 3
    Implement your metrics program in batches

    Metrics Tracking Tool

    A star.

    Active Service Metrics Program

    Once you have defined the way that you will present the metrics, you are ready to run a pilot with a smaller sample of defined service metrics.

    This allows you to validate your approach and make refinements to the implementation and maintenance processes where necessary, prior to activating all service metrics.

    Track the performance of your service metrics

    Supporting Tool icon 3.1

    The Metrics Tracking Tool will enable you to track goals and success metrics for your service metrics programs. It allows you to set long-term goals and track your results over time.

    There are three sections in this tool:
    1. Metrics Tracking Plan. Identify the metrics to be tracked and their purpose.
    2. Metrics Tracking Actuals. Monitor and track the actual performance of the metrics.
    3. Remediation Tracking. Determine and document the steps that need to be taken to correct a sub-performing metric.
    Sample of Info-Tech's Metrics Tracking Tool.

    Select pilot metrics

    Supporting Tool icon 3.1 30 Minutes

    INPUT: Identified services, Business feedback

    OUTPUT: Services with most urgent need or impact

    Materials: Service catalog or list of identified services

    Participants: BRM, SLM, Business representatives

    To start the implementation of your service metrics program and drive wider adoption, you need to run a pilot using a smaller subset of metrics.

    INSTRUCTIONS

    To determine the sample for the pilot, consider metrics that:

    • Are related to critical business services and functions
    • or
    • Address known/visible pain points for the business
    • or
    • Were designed for supportive or influential stakeholders

    Metrics that meet two or more criteria are ideal for the pilot

    Collect and validate data

    Supporting Tool icon 3.2 1 Hour

    INPUT: Identified metrics

    OUTPUT: A data collection mythology, Metrics tracking

    Materials: Metrics

    Participants: SLM, BRM, Service owner

    You will need to start collection and validation of your identified data in order to calculate the results for your pilot metrics.

    INSTRUCTIONS

    1. Initiate data collection
      • Use the data sources identified during the design phase and initiate the data collection process.
    2. Determine start date
      • If historical data can be retrieved and gathered, determine how far back you want your measurements to start.
    3. Compile data and validate
      • Ensure that the information is accurate and up to date. This will require some level of data validation and audit.
    4. Run the metric
      • Use the defined calculation and source data to generate the metrics result.
    5. Record metrics results
      • Use the metrics tracking sheet to track the actual results.

    Determine initial targets

    Supporting Tool icon 3.3 1 Hour

    INPUT: Historical data/baseline data

    OUTPUT: Realistic initial target for improvement

    Materials: Metrics Tracking Tool

    Participants: BRM, SLM, Service owner

    INSTRUCTIONS

    Identify an initial service objective based on one or more of the following options:

    1. Establish an initial target using historical data and trends of performance.
    2. Establish an initial target based on stakeholder-identified requirements and expectations.
    3. Run the metrics report over a defined period of time and use the baseline level of achievement to establish an initial target.

    The target may not always be a number - it could be a trend. The initial target will be changed after review with stakeholders

    Integrate with SLM and BRM processes

    Supporting Tool icon 3.4 1 Hour

    INPUT: SLM and BRM SOPs or responsibility documentations

    OUTPUT: Integrate service metrics into the SLM/BRM role

    Materials: SLM / BRM reports

    Participants: SLM, BRM, CIO, Program manager, Service manager

    The service metrics program is usually initiated, used, and maintained by the SLM and BRM functions.

    INSTRUCTIONS

    Ensure that the metrics pilot is integrated with those functions by:

    1. Engaging with SLM and BRM functions/resources
      • Identify SLM and BRM resources associated with or working on the services where the metrics are being piloted
      • Obtain their feedback on the metrics/reporting
    2. Integrating with the existing reporting and meeting cycles
      • Ensure the metrics will be calculated and available for discussion at standing meetings and with existing reports
    3. Establishing the metrics review and validation cycle for these metrics
      • Confirm the review and validation period for the metrics in order to ensure they remain valuable and actionable

    Generate reports and present to stakeholders

    Supporting Tool icon 3.5 1 Hour

    INPUT: Identified metrics, Selected presentation format

    OUTPUT: Metrics reports that are ready for distribution

    Materials: Metrics Presentation Format Selection Guide

    Participants: BRM, SLM, CIO, Business representatives

    INSTRUCTIONS

    Once you have completed the calculation for the pilot metrics:

    1. Confirm the report style for the selected metrics (as defined in Phase 2)
    2. Generate the reporting for the pilot metrics
    3. Present the pilot metric reports to the identified BRM and SLM resources who will present the reporting to the stakeholders
    4. Gather feedback from Stakeholders on metrics - results and process
    5. Create and execute remediation plans for any actions identified from the metrics
    6. Initiate the review cycle for metrics (to ensure they retain value)

    Plan the rollout and implementation of the metrics reporting program

    Supporting Tool icon 3.6 1 Hour

    INPUT: Feedback from pilot, Services in batch

    OUTPUT: Systematic implementation of metrics

    Materials: Metrics Tracking Tool

    Participants: BRM, SLM, Program manager

    Upon completion of the pilot, move to start the broader implementation of metrics across the organization:

    INSTRUCTIONS

    1. Identify the service metrics that you will implement. They can be selected based on multiple criteria, including:
      • Organizational area/business unit
      • Service criticality
      • Pain points
      • Stakeholder engagement (detractors, supporters)
    2. Create a rollout plan for implementation in batches, identifying expected launch timelines, owners, targeted stakeholders, and communications plans
    3. Use the implementation plan from the pilot to roll out each batch of service metrics:
      • Collect and validate data
      • Determine target(s)
      • Integrate with BRM and SLM
      • Generate and communicate reports to stakeholders

    Maintain the service metrics

    Supporting Tool icon 3.7 1.5 Hour

    INPUT: Feedback from business stakeholders

    OUTPUT: Modification to individual metrics or to the process

    Materials: Metrics Tracking Tool, Metrics Development Workbook

    Participants: CIO, BRM, SLM, Program manager, Service owner

    Once service metrics and reporting become active, it is necessary to determine the review time frame for your metrics to ensure they remain useful.

    INSTRUCTIONS

    1. Confirm and establish a review time frame with stakeholders (e.g. annually, bi-annually, after organizational or strategic changes).
    2. Meet with stakeholders by the review date to discuss the value of existing metrics and validate:
      • Whether the goals associated with the metrics are still valid
      • If the metric is still necessary
      • If there is a more effective way to present the metrics
    3. Track actions based on review outcomes and update the remediation tracking sheet.
    4. Update tracking sheet with last complete review date.

    Maintain the metrics

    Supporting Tool icon 3.7

    Based on the outcome of the review meeting, decide what needs to be done for each metric, using the following options:

    Add

    A new metric is required or an existing metric needs large-scale changes (example: calculation method or scope).
    Triggers metrics design as shown in phases 1 and 2.

    Change

    A minor change is required to the presentation format or data. Note: a major change in a metric would be performed through the Add option.

    Remove

    The metric is no longer required, and it needs to be removed from reporting and data gathering. A final report date for that metric should be determined.

    Maintain

    The metric is still useful and no changes are required to the metric, its measurement, or how it’s reported.

    Ensuring metrics remain valuable

    VC CASE STUDY
    Industry: Manufacturing | Source: CIO Interview

    Reviewing the value of active metrics

    When the video conferencing service was initially implemented, it was performed as a pilot with a group of executives, and then expanded for use throughout the company. It was understood that prior to seeing the full benefit in cost reduction and increased efficiency and effectiveness, the rate of use and adoption had to be understood.

    The primary service metrics created for the service were based on tracking the number of requests for video conference meetings that were received by the IT organization. This identified the growth in use and could be used in conjunction with financial metrics related to travel to help identify the impact of the service through its growth phase.

    Once the service was adopted, this metric continued to be tracked but no longer showed growth or expanded adoption.

    The service manager was no longer sure this needed to be tracked.

    Key Activity

    The metrics around requests for video conference meetings were reviewed at the annual metrics review meeting with the business. The service manager asked if the need for the metric, the goal of tracking adoption, was still important for the business.

    The discussion identified that the adoption rate was over 80%, higher than anticipated, and that there was no value in continuing to track this metric.

    Based on the discussion, the adoption metrics were discontinued and removed from data gathering and reporting, while a success rate metric was added (how many meetings ran successfully and without issue) to ensure the ongoing value of the video conferencing service.

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech Workshop Associated Activity icon

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    Photo of Valence Howden, Senior Manager, CIO Advisory, Info-Tech Research Group.
    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analyst will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech's historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    3.1

    Sample of activity 3.1 'Select pilot metrics'. Select the pilot metrics

    The onsite analyst will help the workshop group select the metrics that should be first implemented based on the urgency and impact of these metrics.

    3.2

    Sample of activity 3.2 'Collect and validate data'. Gather data and set initial targets

    The analyst will help the group create a process to gather data, measure baselines, and set initial targets.

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech Workshop Associated Activity icon

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    3.5

    Sample of activity 3.5 'Generate reports and present to stakeholders'. Generate the reports and validate with stakeholders

    The Info-Tech analyst will help the group establish a process to receive feedback from the business stakeholders once the report is generated.

    3.6

    Sample of activity 3.6 'Plan the rollout and implementation of the metrics reporting program'. Implement the service metrics program

    The analyst will facilitate a discussion on how to implement the metrics program across the organization.

    3.7

    Sample of activity 3.7 'Maintain the service metrics'. Track and maintain the metrics program

    Set up a mechanism to ensure the success of the metrics program by assessing process adherence and process validity.

    Insight breakdown

    Insight 1

    Service metrics are critical to ensuring alignment of IT service performance and business service value achievement.

    Insight 2

    Service metrics reinforce positive business and end-user relationships by providing user-centric information that drives responsiveness and consistent service improvement.

    Insight 3

    Poorly designed metrics drive unintended and unproductive behaviors that have negative impacts on IT and produce negative service outcomes.

    Summary of accomplishment

    Knowledge Gained

    • Follow a methodology to identify metrics that are derived from business objectives.
    • Understand the proper presentation format based on stakeholder needs for information.
    • Establish a process to ensure the metrics provided will continue to provide value and aid decision making.

    Processes Optimized

    • Metrics presentation to business stakeholders
    • Metrics maintenance and tracking

    Deliverables Completed

    • Metrics Development Workbook
    • Metrics Presentation Format Selection Guide
    • Metrics Tracking Tool

    Research contributors and experts

    Name Organization
    Joe Evers Joe Evers Consulting
    Glen Notman Associate Partner, Citihub
    David Parker Client Program Manager, eHealth Ontario
    Marianne Doran Collins CIO, The CIO-Suite, LLC
    Chris Kalbfleisch Manager, Service Management, eHealth Ontario
    Joshua Klingenberg BHP Billiton Canada Inc.

    Related Info-Tech research

    Stock image of a menu. Design & Build a User-Facing Service Catalog
    The user-facing service catalog is the go-to place for IT service-related information.
    Stock image of a laptop keyboard. Unleash the True Value of IT by Transforming Into a Service Provider
    Earn your seat at the table and influence business strategy by becoming an IT service provider.

    Bibliography

    Pollock, Bill. “Service Benchmarking and Measurement: Using Metrics to Drive Customer Satisfaction and Profits.” Aberdeen Group. June 2009. http://722consulting.com/ServiceBenchmarkingandMeasurement.pdf

    PwC. “Mega-Trends and Implications.” RMI Discussion. LinkedIn SlideShare. September 2015. http://www.slideshare.net/AnandRaoPwC/mega-trends-and-implications-to-retirement

    PwC. “Healthcare’s new entrants: Who will be the industry’s Amazon.com?” Health Research Institute. April 2014. https://www.pwc.com/us/en/health-industries/healthcare-new-entrants/assets/pwc-hri-new-entrant-chart-pack-v3.pdf

    PwC. “Northern Lights: Where are we now?” PwC Blogs. 2012. http://pwc.blogs.com/files/12.09.06---northern-lights-2--summary.pdf

    PwC. “PwC’s key performance indicators

    Improve Your IT Recruitment Process

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}578|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Attract & Select
    • Parent Category Link: /attract-and-select

    Business and IT leaders aiming to recruit and select the best talent need to:

    • Get involved in the talent acquisition process at key moments.
    • Market their organization to top talent through an authentic employer brand.
    • Create engaging and accurate job ads.
    • Leverage purposeful sourcing for anticipated talent needs.
    • Effectively assess candidates with a strong interview process.
    • Set up new employees for success.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    To create a great candidate experience, IT departments must be involved in the process at key points, recruitment and selection is not a job for HR alone!

    Impact and Result

    • Use this how-to guide to articulate an authentic (employee value proposition) EVP and employer brand.
    • Perform an analysis of current sourcing methods and build an action plan to get IT involved.
    • Create an effective and engaging job ad to insure the right people are applying.
    • Train hiring managers to effectively deliver interviews that correctly assess candidate suitability.
    • Get links to in-depth Info-Tech resources and tools.

    Improve Your IT Recruitment Process Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Improve Your IT Recruitment Process – A guide to help you attract and select the best talent.

    Train your IT department to get involved in the recruitment process to attract and select the best talent.

    • Improve Your IT Recruitment Process Capstone Deck

    2. Improve Your IT Recruitment Process Workbook – A tool to document your action plans.

    Use this tool in conjunction with the Improve you IT Recruitment Process to document your action plans

    • Improve Your IT Recruitment Process Workbook

    3. Interview Guide Template – A template to organize interview questions and their rating scales, take notes during the interview, and ensure all interviews follow a similar structure.

    To get useful information from an interview, the interviewer should be focused on what candidates are saying and how they are saying it, not on what the next question will be, what probes to ask, or how they will score the responses. This Interview Guide Template will help interviewers stay focused and collect good information about candidates.

    • Interview Guide Template

    4. IT Behavioral Interview Question Library – A tool that contains a complete list of sample questions aligned with core, leadership, and IT competencies.

    Hiring managers can choose from a comprehensive collection of core, functional, and leadership competency-based behavioral interview questions.

    • IT Behavioral Interview Question Library

    5. Job Ad Template – A template to allow complete documentation of the characteristics, responsibilities, and requirements for a given job posting in IT.

    Use this template to develop a well-written job posting that will attract the star candidates and, in turn, deflect submission of irrelevant applications by those unqualified.

    • Job Ad Template

    6. Idea Catalog – A tool to evaluate virtual TA solutions.

    The most innovative technology isn’t necessarily the right solution. Review talent acquisition (TA) solutions and evaluate the purpose each option serves in addressing critical challenges and replacing critical in-person activities.

    • Idea Catalog: Adapt the Talent Acquisition Process to a Virtual Environment
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Improve Your IT Recruitment Process

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Employee Value Proposition and Employer Branding

    The Purpose

    Establish the employee value proposition (EVP) and employer brand.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Have a well-defined EVP that you communicate through your employer brand.

    Activities

    1.1 Gather feedback.

    1.2 Build key messages.

    1.3 Assess employer brand.

    Outputs

    Content and themes surrounding the EVP

    Draft EVP and supporting statements

    A clearer understanding of the current employer brand and how it could be improved

    2 Job Ads and Sourcing

    The Purpose

    Develop job postings and build a strong sourcing program.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Create the framework for an effective job posting and analyze existing sourcing methods.

    Activities

    2.1 Review and update your job ads.

    2.2 Review the effectiveness of existing sourcing programs.

    2.3 Review job ads and sourcing methods for bias.

    Outputs

    Updated job ad

    Low usage sourcing methods identified for development

    Minimize bias present in ads and sourcing methods

    3 Effective Interviewing

    The Purpose

    Create a high-quality interview process to improve candidate assessment.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Training on being an effective interviewer.

    Activities

    3.1 Create an ideal candidate scorecard.

    3.2 Map out your interview process.

    3.3 Practice behavioral interviews.

    Outputs

    Ideal candidate persona

    Finalized interview and assessment process

    Practice interviews

    4 Onboarding and Action Plan

    The Purpose

    Drive employee engagement and retention with a robust program that acclimates, guides, and develops new hires.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Evaluation of current onboarding practice.

    Activities

    4.1 Evaluate and redesign the onboarding program.

    Outputs

    Determine new onboarding activities to fill identified gaps.

    Further reading

    Improve Your IT Recruitment Process

    Train your IT department to get involved in the recruitment process to attract and select the best talent.

    Own the IT recruitment process

    Train your IT department to get involved in the recruitment process to attract and select the best talent.

    Follow this blueprint to:

    • Define and communicate the unique benefits of working for your organization to potential candidates through a strong employer brand.
    • Learn best practices around creating effective job postings.
    • Target your job posting efforts on the areas with the greatest ROI.
    • Create and deliver an effective, seamless, and positive interview and offer process for candidates.
    • Acclimate new hires and set them up for success.

    Get involved at key moments of the candidate experience to have the biggest impact


    Employee Value Proposition (EVP) and Employer Brand



    Job Postings and a Strong Sourcing Program

    Effective Interviewing

    Onboarding: Setting up New Hires For Success

    Awareness Research Application Screening Interview and Assessment Follow Up Onboarding

    RECRUIT QUALITY STAFF

    Hiring talent is critical to organizational success

    Talent is a priority for the entire organization:

    Respondents rated “recruitment” as the top issue facing organizations today (McLean & Company 2022 HR Trends Report).

    37% of IT departments are outsourcing roles to fill internal skill shortages (Info-Tech Talent Trends 2022 Survey).

    Yet bad hires are alarmingly common:

    Hiring is one of the least successful business processes, with three-quarters of managers reporting that they have made a bad hire (Robert Half, 2021).

    48% of survey respondents stated improving the quality of hires was the top recruiting priority for 2021 (Jobvite, 2021).

    Workshop overview

    Prework

    Day 1

    Day 2

    Day 3

    Day 4

    Post work

    Current Process and Job Descriptions Documented

    Establish the Employee Value Proposition (EVP) and Employer Brand

    Develop Job Postings and Build a Strong Sourcing Program

    Effective Interviewing

    Onboarding and Action Planning

    Putting the Action Plan Into Action!

    Activities

    • Recruitment Process Mapped Out and Stakeholders Identified
    • Prepare a JD and JP for Four Priority Jobs
    • Collect Information on Where Your Best Candidates Are Coming From

    1.1 Introduce the Concept of an EVP

    1.2 Brainstorm Unique Benefits of Working at Your Organization

    1.2 Employer Brand Introduction

    2.1 What Makes an Attractive Job Posting

    2.2 Create the Framework for Job Posting

    2.3 Improve the Sourcing Process

    2.4 Review Process for Bias

    3.1 Creating an Interview Process

    3.2 Selecting Interview Questions

    3.3 Avoiding Bias During Interviews

    3.4 Practice Interviews

    4.1 Why Onboarding Matters

    4.2 Acclimatize New Hires and Set Them Up for Success

    4.3 Action Plan

    5.1 Review Outputs and Select Priorities

    5.2 Consult With HR and Senior Management to Get Buy-In

    5.3 Plan to Avoid Relapse Behaviors

    Deliverables

    1. EVP draft completed
    2. Employer brand action plan
    1. Organization-specific job posting framework
    2. Sourcing Plan Template for four priority jobs
    3. Sourcing action plan
    1. Completed Interview Guide Template
    2. Managers practice a panel interview
    1. Onboarding best practices
    2. Action plan

    Enhance Your Recruitment Strategies

    The way you position the organization impacts who is likely to apply to posted positions.

    Develop a strong employee value proposition

    What is an employee value proposition?

    And what are the key components?

    The employee value proposition is your opportunity to showcase the unique benefits and opportunities of working at your organization, allowing you to attract a wider pool of candidates.

    AN EMPLOYEE VALUE PROPOSITION IS:

    AN EMPLOYEE VALUE PROPOSITION IS NOT:

    • An authentic representation of the employee experience
    • Aligned with organizational culture
    • Fundamental to all stages of the employee lifecycle
    • A guide to help investment in programs and policies
    • Short and succinct
    • What the employee can do for you
    • A list of programs and policies
    • An annual project

    THE FOUR KEY COMPONENTS OF AN EMPLOYEE VALUE PROPOSITION

    Rewards

    Organizational Elements

    Working Conditions

    Day-to-Day Job Elements

    • Compensation
    • Health Benefits
    • Retirement Benefits
    • Vacation
    • Culture
    • Customer Focus
    • Organization Potential
    • Department Relationships
    • Senior Management Relationships
    • Work/Life Balance
    • Working Environment
    • Employee Empowerment
    • Development
    • Rewards & Recognition
    • Co-Worker Relationships
    • Manager Relationships

    Creating a compelling EVP that presents a picture of your employee experience, with a focus on diversity, will attract a wide pool of diverse candidates to your team. This can lead to many internal and external benefits for your organization.

    How to collect information on your EVP

    Existing Employee Value Proposition: If your organization or IT department has an existing employee value proposition, rather than starting from scratch, we recommend leveraging that and moving to the testing phase to see if the EVP still resonates with staff and external parties.

    Employee Engagement Results: If your organization does an employee engagement survey, review the results to identify the areas in which the IT organization is performing well. Identify and document any key comment themes in the report around why employees enjoy working for the organization or what makes your IT department a great place to work.

    Social Media Sites. Prepare for the good, the bad, and the ugly. Social media websites like Glassdoor and Indeed make it easier for employees to share their experiences at an organization honestly and candidly. While postings on these sites won’t relate exclusively to the IT department, they do invite participants to identify their department in the organization. You can search these to identify any positive things people are saying about working for the organization and potentially opportunities for improvement (which you can use as a starting point in the retention section of this report).

    1.1 Gather feedback

    1. Download the Improve Your IT Recruitment Workbook.
    2. On tab 1.1, brainstorm the top five things you value most about working at the organization. Ask yourself what would fall in each category and identify any key themes. Be sure to take note of any specific quotes you have.
    3. Brainstorm limitations that the organization currently has in each of those areas.

    Download the Recruitment Workbook

    Input

    Output
    • Employee opinions
    • Employee responses to four EVP components
    • Content for EVP

    Materials

    Participants

    • Recruitment Workbook
    • Diverse employees
    • Different departments
    • Different role levels

    1.2 Build key messages

    1. Go to tab 1.2 in your workbook
    2. Identify themes from activity 1.1 that would be considered current strengths of you organization.
    3. Identify themes from activity 1.2 that are aspirational elements of your organization.
    4. Identify up to four key statements to focus on for the EVP, ensuring that your EVP speaks to at least one of the five categories above.
    5. Integrate these into one overall statement.

    Examples below.

    Input

    Output
    • Feedback from focus groups
    • EVP and supporting statements

    Materials

    Participants

    • Workbook handout
    • Pen and paper for documenting responses
    • IT leadership team

    Sample EVPs

    Shopify

    “We’re Shopify. Our mission is to make commerce better for everyone – but we’re not the workplace for everyone. We thrive on change, operate on trust, and leverage the diverse perspectives of people on our team in everything we do. We solve problems at a rapid pace. In short, we get shit done.”

    Bettercloud

    “At Bettercloud, we have a smart, ambitious team dedicated to delighting our customers. Our culture of ownership and transparency empowers our team to achieve goals they didn’t think possible. For all those on board, it’s going to be a challenging and rewarding journey – and we’re just getting started.”

    Ellevest

    “As a team member at Ellevest, you can expect to make a difference through your work, to have a direct impact on the achievement of a very meaningful mission, to significantly advance your career trajectory, and to have room for fun and fulfillment in your daily life. We know that achieving a mission as critical as ours requires incredible talent and teamwork, and team is the most important thing to us.”

    Sources: Built In, 2021; Workology, 2022

    Ensure your EVP resonates with employees and prospects

    Test your EVP with internal and external audiences.

    INTERNAL TEST REVOLVES AROUND THE 3A’s

    EXTERNAL TEST REVOLVES AROUND THE 3C’s

    ALIGNED: The EVP is in line with the organization’s purpose, vision, values, and processes. Ensure policies and programs are aligned with the organization’s EVP.

    CLEAR: The EVP is straightforward, simple, and easy to understand. Without a clear message in the market, even the best intentioned EVPs can be lost in confusion.

    ACCURATE: The EVP is clear and compelling, supported by proof points. It captures the true employee experience, which matches the organization’s communication and message in the market.

    COMPELLING: The EVP emphasizes the value created for employees and is a strong motivator to join this organization. A strong EVP will be effective in drawing in external candidates. The message will resonate with them and attract them to your organization.

    ASPIRATIONAL: The EVP inspires both individuals and the IT organization as a whole. Identify and invest in the areas that are sure to generate the highest returns for employees.

    COMPREHENSIVE: The EVP provides enough information for the potential employee to understand the true employee experience and to self-assess whether they are a good fit for your organization. If the EVP lacks depth, the potential employee may have a hard time understanding the benefits and rewards of working for your organization.

    Want to learn more?

    Recruit IT Talent

    • Improve candidate experience to hire top IT talent.

    Recruit and Retain More Women in IT

    • Gender diversity is directly correlated to IT performance.

    Recruit and Retain People of Color in IT

    • Good business, not just good philanthropy.

    Enhance Your Recruitment Strategies

    The way you position the organization impacts who is likely to apply to posted positions.

    Market your EVP to potential candidates: Employer Brand

    Employer brand includes how you market the EVP internally and externally – consistency is key

    The employer brand is the perception internal and external stakeholders hold of the organization and exists whether it has been curated or not. Curating the employer brand involves marketing the organization and employee experience. Grounding your employer brand in your EVP enables you to communicate and market an accurate portrayal of your organization and employee experience and make you desirable to both current and potential employees.

    The image contains a picture of several shapes. There is a trapezoid that is labelled EVP, and has a an arrow pointing to the text beside it. There is also an arrowing pointing down from it to another trapezoid that is labelled Employer Brand.

    The unique offering an employer provides to employees in return for their effort, motivating them to join or remain at the organization.

    The perception internal and external stakeholders hold of the organization.

    Alignment between the EVP, employer brand, and corporate brand is the ideal branding package. An in-sync marketing strategy ensures stakeholders perceive and experience the brand the same way, creating brand ambassadors.

    The image contains three circles that are connected. The circles are labelled: EVP, Employer Brand, Corporate Brand.

    Ensure your branding material creates a connection

    How you present your employer brand is just as important as the content. Ideally, you want the viewer to connect with and personalize the material for the message to have staying power. Use Marketing’s expertise to help craft impactful promotional materials to engage and excite the viewer.

    Visuals

    Images are often the first thing viewers notice. Use visuals that connect to your employer brand to engage the viewer’s attention and increase the likelihood that your message will resonate. However, if there are too many visuals this may detract from your content – balance is key!

    Language

    Wordsmithing is often the most difficult aspect of marketing. Your message should be accurate, informative, and engaging. Work with Marketing to ensure your wording is clever and succinct – the more concise, the better.

    Composition

    Integrate visuals and language to complete your marketing package. Ensure that the text and images are balanced to draw in the viewer.

    Case Study: Using culture to drive your talent pool

    This case study is happening in real time. Please check back to learn more as Goddard continues to recruit for the position.

    Recruiting at NASA

    Goddard Space Center is the largest of NASA’s space centers with approximately 11,000 employees. It is currently recruiting for a senior technical role for commercial launches. The position requires consulting and working with external partners and vendors.

    NASA is a highly desirable employer due to its strong culture of inclusivity, belonging, teamwork, learning, and growth. Its culture is anchored by a compelling vision, “For the betterment of Humankind,” and amplified by a strong leadership team that actively lives their mission and vision daily.

    Firsthand lists NASA as #1 on the 50 most prestigious internships for 2022.

    Rural location and no flexible work options add to the complexity of recruiting

    The position is in a rural area of Eastern Shore Virginia with a population of approximately 60,000 people, which translates to a small pool of candidates. Any hire from outside the area will be expected to relocate as the senior technician must be onsite to support launches twice a month. Financial relocation support is not offered and the position is a two-year assignment with the option of extension that could eventually become permanent.

    The image contains a picture of Steve Thornton.

    “Looking for a Talent Unicorn: a qualified, experienced candidate with both leadership skills and deep technical expertise that can grow and learn with emerging technologies.”

    Steve Thornton

    Acting Division Chief, Solutions Division, Goddard Space Flight Center, NASA

    Case Study: Using culture to drive your talent pool

    A good brand overcomes challenges.

    Culture takes the lead in NASA's job postings, which attract a high number of candidates. Postings begin with a link to a short video on working at NASA, its history, and how it lives its vision. The video highlights NASA's diversity of perspectives, career development, and learning opportunities.

    NASA's company brand and employer brand are tightly intertwined, providing a consistent view of the organization.

    The employer vision is presented in the best place to reach NASA's ideal candidate: usajobs.gov, the official website of the United States Government and the “go-to” for government job listings. NASA also extends its postings to other generic job sites as well as LinkedIn and professional associations.

    The image contains a picture of Robert Leahy.

    Interview with Robert Leahy

    Chief Information Officer, Goddard Space Flight Center, NASA

    2.1 Assess your organization’s employer brand

    1. Go to tab 2.1 in the Improve Your IT Recruitment Workbook.
    2. Put yourself in the shoes of someone on the outside looking in. If they were to look up your organization, what impression would they be given about what is like to work there?
    3. Run a Google search on your organization with key words “jobs,” “culture,” and “working environment” to see what a potential candidate would see when they begin researching your organization.
    4. You can use sites like:

    • Glassdoor
    • Indeed company pages
    • LinkedIn company pages
    • Social media
    • Your own website
  • Identify what your organization is doing well and record that under the “Continue” box in your workbook.
  • Record anything your organization should stop doing under the “Stop” box.
  • Brainstorm some ideas that your organization should think about implementing to improve the employer brand under the “Start” Box.
  • Input Output
    • Existing branding material on the internet
    • A clearer understanding of the current employer brand and how it could be improved
    Materials Participants
    • Workbook handout
    • Senior IT Leaders

    Want to learn more?

    Recruit IT Talent

    • Improve candidate experience to hire top IT talent.

    Recruit and Retain More Women in IT

    • Gender diversity is directly correlated to IT performance.

    Recruit and Retain People of Color in IT

    • Good business, not just good philanthropy.

    Enhance Your Recruitment Strategies

    The way you position the organization impacts who is likely to apply to posted positions.

    Create engaging job ads to attract talent to the organization

    We have a job description; can I just post that on Indeed?

    A job description is an internal document that includes sections such as general job information, major responsibilities, key relationships, qualifications, and competencies. It communicates job expectations to incumbents and key job data to HR programs.

    A job ad is an externally facing document that advertises a position with the intent of attracting job applicants. It contains key elements from the job description as well as information on the organization and its EVP.

    Write an Effective Job Ad

    • Ensure that your job ad speaks to the audience you are targeting through the language you use.
      • E.g. If you are hiring for a creative role, use creative language and formatting. If you are writing for students, emphasize growth opportunities.
    • Highlight the organization’s EVP.
    • Paint an accurate picture of key aspects of the role but avoid the nitty gritty as it may overwhelm applicants.
    • Link to your organization’s website and social media platforms so applicants can easily find more information.

    A job description informs a job ad, it doesn’t replace it. Don’t be lulled into using a job description as a posting when there’s a time crunch to fill a position. Refer to job postings as job advertisements to reinforce that their purpose is to attract attention and talent.

    An effective job posting contains the following elements:

    Position Title
    • Clearly defined job titles are important for screening applicants as this is one of the first things the candidate will read.
    • Indicating the earnings range that the position pays cuts out time spent on reviewing candidates who may never accept the position and saves them from applying to a job that doesn’t match what they are looking for.
    Company
    • Provide a brief description of the organization including the products or services it offers, the corporate culture, and any training and career development programs.
    Summary Description
    • Describe briefly why the position exists. In other words, what is the position's primary purpose? The statement should include the overall results the job is intended to produce and some of the key means by which the position achieves these results.
    Responsibilities
    • Use bullet points to list the fundamental accountabilities of the position. Candidates want to know what they will be doing on a day-to-day basis.
    • Begin each responsibility or accountability statement with an action word and follow with a brief phrase to describe what is done to accomplish the function.
    Position Characteristics
    • Give examples of key problems and thinking challenges encountered by the position. Describe the type of analysis or creativity required to resolve these problems.
    • Provide examples of final decision-making authority. The examples should reflect the constraints placed on the position by people, policies, and/or procedures.
    Position Requirements
    • List all formal education and certifications required.
    • List all knowledge and experience required.
    • List all personal attributes required.
    Work Conditions
    • List all work conditions that the employee must accommodate. This could include any sensory, physical, or mental requirements of the position or any special conditions of employment, such as hours.
    Process to Apply
    • Include the methods in which the organization wants to receive applications and contact information of who will receive the applications.

    Bottom Line: A truly successful job posting ferrets out those hidden stars that may be over cautious and filters out hundreds of applications from the woefully under qualified.

    The do’s and don’ts of an inclusive job ad

    DON’T overlook the power of words. Avoid phrases like “strong English language skills” as this may deter non-native English speakers from applying and a “clean-shaven” requirement can exclude candidates whose faith requires them to maintain facial hair.

    DON’T post a long requirements list. A study showed that the average jobseeker spends only 49.7 seconds reviewing a listing before deciding it's not a fit.*

    DON’T present a toxic work culture; phrases such as “work hard, play hard” can put off many candidates and play into the “bro- culture” stereotype in tech.

    Position Title: Senior Lorem Ipsum

    Salary Band: $XXX to $XXX

    Diversity is a core value at ACME Inc. We believe that diversity and inclusion is our strength, and we’re passionate about building an environment where all employees are valued and can perform at their best.

    As a … you will …

    Our ideal candidate ….

    Required Education and Experience

    • Bachelor’s degree in …
    • Minimum five (5) years …

    Required Skills

    Preferred Skills

    At ACME Inc. you will find …

    DO promote pay equity by being up front and honest about salary expectations.

    DO emphasize your organization’s commitment to diversity and an inclusive workplace by adding an equity statement.

    DO limit your requirements to “must haves” or at least showcase them first before the “nice-to-haves.”

    DO involve current employees or members of your employee resource groups when creating job descriptions to ensure that they ask for what you really need.

    DO focus on company values and criteria that are important to the job, not just what’s always been done.

    *Source: Ladders, 2013

    Before posting the job ad complete the DEI job posting validation checklist

    Does the job posting highlight your organization’s EVP

    Does the job posting avoid words that might discourage women, people of color, and other members of underrepresented groups from applying?

    Has the position description been carefully reviewed and revised to reflect current and future expectations for the position, rather than expectations informed by the persons who have previously held the job?

    Has the hiring committee eliminated any unnecessary job skills or requirements (college degree, years or type of previous experience, etc.) that might negatively impact recruitment of underrepresented groups?

    Has the hiring committee posted the job in places (job boards, websites, colleges, etc.) where applicants from underrepresented groups will be able to easily view or access it?

    Have members of the hiring committee attended job fairs or other events hosted by underrepresented groups?

    Has the hiring committee asked current employees from underrepresented groups to spread the word about the position?

    Has the hiring committee worked with the marketing team to ensure that people from diverse groups are featured in the organization’s website, publications, and social media?

    es the job description clearly demonstrate the organization’s and leadership’s commitment to DEI?

    *Source: Recruit and Retain People of Color in IT

    3.1 Review and update your job ads

    1. Download the Job Ad Template.
    2. Look online or ask HR for an example of a current job advertisement you are using.
    • If you don’t have one, you can use a job description as a starting point.
  • Review all the elements of the job ad and make sure they align with the list on the previous slide, adding or changing, as necessary. Your job ad should be no more than two pages long.
  • Using the tools on the previous two slides, review your first draft to ensure the job posting is free of language or elements that will discourage diverse candidates from applying.
  • Review your job advertisement with HR to get feedback or to use as a template going forward.
  • Input Output
    • Existing job ad or job description
    • Updated job ad
    Materials Participants
    • Job ad or job description
    • Job Ad Template
    • Hiring Managers

    Want to learn more?

    Recruit IT Talent

    • Improve candidate experience to hire top IT talent.

    Recruit and Retain More Women in IT

    • Gender diversity is directly correlated to IT performance.

    Recruit and Retain People of Color in IT

    • Good business, not just good philanthropy.

    Enhance Your Recruitment Strategies

    Focus on key programs and tactics to improve the effectiveness of your sourcing approach.

    Get involved with sourcing to get your job ad seen

    To meet growing expectations, organizations need to change the way they source

    Social Media

    Social media has trained candidates to expect:

    • Organizations to stay in touch and keep track of them.
    • A personalized candidate experience.
    • To understand organizational culture and a day in the life.

    While the focus on the candidate experience is important throughout the talent acquisition process, social media, technology, and values have made it a critical component of sourcing.

    Technology

    Candidates expect to be able to access job ads from all platforms.

    • Today, close to 90% of candidates use a mobile platform to job hunt (SmartRecruiters, 2022).
    • However, only 36% of organizations are optimizing their job postings for mobile. (The Undercover Recruiter, 2021)

    Job ads must be clear, concise, and easily viewed on a mobile device.

    Candidate Values

    Job candidate’s values are changing.

    • There is a growing focus on work/life balance, purpose, innovation, and career development. Organizations need to understand candidate values and highlight how the EVP aligns with these interests.

    Authenticity remains important.

    • Clearly and accurately represent your organization and its culture.

    Focus on key programs and tactics to improve the effectiveness of your sourcing approach

    Internal Talent Mobility (ITM) Program

    Social Media Program

    Employee Referral Program

    Alumni Program

    Campus Recruiting Program

    Other Sourcing Tactics

    Take advantage of your current talent with an internal talent mobility program

    What is it?

    Positioning the right talent in the right place, at the right time, for the right reasons, and supporting them appropriately.

    Internal Talent Mobility (ITM) Program

    Social Media Program

    Employee Referral Program

    Alumni Program

    Campus Recruiting Program

    Other Sourcing Tactics

    ITM program benefits:

    1. Retention
    2. Provide opportunities to develop professionally, whether in the current role or through promotions/lateral moves. Keep strong performers and high-potential employees committed to the organization.

    3. Close Skills Gap
    4. Address rapid change, knowledge drain due to retiring Baby Boomers, and frustration associated with time to hire or time to productivity.

    5. Cost/Time Savings
    6. Reduce spend on talent acquisition, severance, time to productivity, and onboarding.

    7. Employee Engagement
    8. Increase motivation and productivity by providing increased growth and development opportunities.

    9. EVP
    10. Align with the organization’s offering and what is important to the employees from a development perspective.

    11. Employee & Leadership Development
    12. Support and develop employees from all levels and job functions.

    Leverage social media to identify and connect with talent

    Internal Talent Mobility (ITM) Program

    Social Media Program

    Employee Referral Program

    Alumni Program

    Campus Recruiting Program

    Other Sourcing Tactics

    What is it? The widely accessible electronic tools that enable anyone to publish and access information, collaborate on common efforts, and build relationships.

    Learning to use social media effectively is key to sourcing the right talent.

    • Today, 92% of organizations leverage social media for talent acquisition.
    • 80% of employers find passive candidates through social media – second only to referrals.
    • 86% percent of job seekers used social media for their most recent job search.
    (Ku, 2021)

    Benefits of social media:

    • Provides access to candidates who may not know the organization.
    • Taps extended networks.
    • Facilitates consistent communication with candidates and talent in pipelines.
    • Personalizes the candidate experience.
    • Provides access to extensive data.

    Challenges of social media:

    With the proliferation of social media and use by most organizations, social media platforms have become overcrowded. As a result:

    • Organizations are directly and very apparently competing for talent with competitors.
    • Users are bombarded with information and are tuning out.

    “It is all about how we can get someone’s attention and get them to respond. People are becoming jaded.”

    – Katrina Collier, Social Recruiting Expert, The Searchologist

    Reap the rewards of an employee referral program

    Internal Talent Mobility (ITM) Program

    Social Media Program

    Employee Referral Program

    Alumni Program

    Campus Recruiting Program

    Other Sourcing Tactics

    What is it? Employees recommend qualified candidates. If the referral is hired, the referring employee typically receives some sort of reward.

    Benefits of an employee referral program:

    1. Lower Recruiting Costs
    2. 55% of organizations report that hiring a referral is less expensive that a non-referred candidate (Clutch, 2020).

    3. Decreased time to fill
    4. The average recruiting lifecycle for an employee referral is 29 days, compared with 55 days for a non referral (Betterup, 2022).

    5. Decreased turnover
    6. 46% percent of employees who were referred stay at their organization for a least one year, compared to 33% of career site hires (Betterup, 2022).

    7. Increased quality of hire
    8. High performers are more likely to refer other high performers to an organization (The University of Chicago Press, 2019).

    Avoid the Like Me Bias: Continually evaluate the diversity of candidates sourced from the employee referral program. Unless your workforce is already diverse, referrals can hinder diversity because employees tend to recommend people like themselves.

    Tap into your network of former employees

    Internal Talent Mobility (ITM) Program

    Social Media Program

    Employee Referral Program

    Alumni Program

    Campus Recruiting Program

    Other Sourcing Tactics

    What is it? An alumni referral program is a formalized way to maintain ongoing relationships with former employees of the organization.

    Successful organizations use an alumni program:

    • 98% of the F500 have some sort of Alumni program (LinkedIn, 2019).

    Benefits of an alumni program:

    1. Branding
    • Alumni are regarded as credible sources of information. They can be a valuable resource for disseminating and promoting the employer brand.
  • Source of talent
    • Boomerang employees are doubly valuable as they understand the organization and also have developed skills and industry experience.
      • Recover some of the cost of turnover and cost per hire with a pool of prequalified candidates who will more quickly reach full productivity.
  • Referral potential
    • Developing a robust alumni network provides access to a larger network through referrals.
    • Alumni already know what is required to be successful in the organization so they can refer more suitable candidates.

    Make use of a campus recruiting program

    Internal Talent Mobility (ITM) Program

    Social Media Program

    Employee Referral Program

    Alumni Program

    Campus Recruiting Program

    Other Sourcing Tactics

    What is it? A formalized means of attracting and hiring individuals who are about to graduate from schools, colleges, or universities.

    Almost 70% of companies are looking to employ new college graduates every year (HR Shelf, 2022).

    Campus recruitment benefits:

    • Increases employer brand awareness among talent entering the workforce.
    • Provides the opportunity to interact with large groups of potential candidates at one time.
    • Presents the opportunity to identify and connect with high-quality talent before they graduate and are actively looking for positions.
    • Offers access to a highly diverse audience.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Target schools that align with your culture and needs. Do not just focus on the most prestigious schools: they are likely more costly, have more intense competition, and may not actually provide the right talent.

    Identify opportunities to integrate non-traditional techniques

    Internal Talent Mobility (ITM) Program

    Social Media Program

    Employee Referral Program

    Alumni Program

    Campus Recruiting Program

    Other Sourcing Tactics

    1. Professional industry associations
    • Tap into candidates who have the necessary competencies.

    5. Not-for-profit intermediaries

    • Partner with not-for-profits to tap into candidates in training or mentorship programs.
    • Example:
      • Year Up (General)
      • Bankwork$ (Banking)
      • Youth Build (Construction)
      • iFoster (Grocery)

    American Expresscreated a boot camp for software engineers in partnership with Year Up and Gateway Community College to increase entry-level IT hires.

    Results:

    • Annually hire 80-100 interns from Year Up.
    • Improved conversion rates: 72% of Year Up interns versus 60% of traditional interns.
    • Increased retention: 44 (Year Up) versus 18 months (traditional).
    (HBR, 2016)

    2. Special interest groups

    • Use for niche role sourcing.
    • Find highly specialized talent.
    • Drive diversity (Women in Project Management).

    6. Gamification

    • Attract curiosity and reaffirm innovation at your organization.
    • Communicate the EVP.
    3. Customers
    • Access those engaged with the organization.
    • Add the employer brand to existing messaging.

    PwC (Hungary) created Multiploy, a two-day game that allows students to virtually experience working in accounting or consulting at the organization.

    Results:

    • 78% of students said they wanted to work for PwC.
    • 92% indicated they had a more positive view of the firm.
    • Increase in the number of job applicants.
    (Zielinski, 2015)

    4. Exit interviews

    • Ask exiting employees “where should we recruit someone to replace you?”
    • Leverage their knowledge to glean insight into where to find talent.

    Partner with other organizational functions to build skills and leverage existing knowledge

    Use knowledge that already exists in the organization to improve talent sourcing capabilities.

    Marketing

    HR

    Marketing knows how to:

    • Build attention-grabbing content.
    • Use social media platforms effectively.
    • Effectively promote a brand.
    • Use creative methods to connect with people.

    HR knows how to:

    • Organize recruitment activities.
    • Identify the capabilities of various technologies available to support sourcing.
    • Solve issues that may arise along the way

    To successfully partner with other departments in your organization:

    • Acknowledge that they are busy. Like IT, they have multiple competing priorities.
    • Present your needs and prioritize them. Create a list of what you are looking for and then be willing to just pick your top need. Work with the other department to decide what needs can and cannot be met.
    • Present the business case. Emphasize how partnering is mutually beneficial. For example, illustrate to Marketing that promoting a strong brand with candidates will improve the organization’s overall reputation because often, candidates are customers.
    • Be reasonable and patient. You are asking for help, so be moderate in your expectations and flexible in working with your partner.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Encourage your team to seek out, and learn from, employees in different divisions. Training sessions with the teams may not always be possible but one-on-one chats can be just as effective and may be better received.

    5.1 Review the effectiveness of existing sourcing programs

    1. As a group review the description of each program as defined on previous slides. Ensure that everyone understands the definitions.
    2. In your workbook, look for the cell Internal Talent Mobility under the title; you will find five rows with the following
    • This program is formally structured and documented.
    • This program is consistently applied across the organization.
    • Talent is sourced this way on an ad hoc basis.
    • Our organization currently does not source talent this way.
    • There are metrics in place to assess the effectiveness of this program.
  • Ask everyone in the group if they agree with the statement for each column; once everyone has had a chance to answer each of the questions, discuss any discrepancies which exist.
  • After coming to a consensus, record the answers.
  • Repeat this process for the other four sourcing programs (social media, employee referral program, alumni network program, and campus recruiting program).
  • InputOutput
    • Existing knowledge on sourcing approach
    • Low usage sourcing methods identified for development
    MaterialsParticipants
    • Workbook
    • Hiring Managers

    Want to learn more?

    Recruit IT Talent

    • Improve candidate experience to hire top IT talent.

    Recruit and Retain More Women in IT

    • Gender diversity is directly correlated to IT performance.

    Recruit and Retain People of Color in IT

    • Good business, not just good philanthropy.

    Enhance Your Recruitment Strategies

    Interviews are the most often used yet poorly executed hiring tool.

    Create a high-quality interview process to improve candidate assessment

    Everyone believes they’re a great interviewer; self-assess your techniques, and “get real” to get better

    If you…

    • Believe everything the candidate says.
    • Ask mostly hypothetical questions: "What would you do in a situation where…"
    • Ask gimmicky questions: "If you were a vegetable, what vegetable would you be?"
    • Ask only traditional interview questions: "What are your top three strengths?”
    • Submit to a first impression bias.
    • Have not defined what you are looking for before the interview.
    • Ignore your gut feeling in an attempt to be objective.
    • Find yourself loving a candidate because they are just like you.
    • Use too few or too many interviewers in the process.
    • Do not ask questions to determine the motivational fit of the candidate.
    • Talk more than the interviewee.
    • Only plan and prepare for the interview immediately before it starts.

    …then stop. Use this research!

    Most interviewers are not effective, resulting in many poor hiring decisions, which is costly and counter-productive

    Most interviewers are not effective…

    • 82% of organizations don’t believe they hire highly talented people (Trost, 2022).
    • Approximately 76% of managers and HR representatives that McLean & Company interviewed agreed that the majority of interviewers are not very effective.
    • 66% of hiring managers come to regret their interview-based hiring decisions (DDI, 2021).

    …because, although everyone knows interviewing is a priority, most don’t make it one.

    • Interviewing is often considered an extra task in addition to an employee’s day-to-day responsibilities, and these other responsibilities take precedence.
    • It takes time to effectively design, prepare for, and conduct an interview.
    • Employees would rather spend this time on tasks they consider to be an immediate priority.

    Even those interviewers who are good at interviewing, may not be good enough.

    • Even a good interviewer can be fooled by a great interviewee.
    • Some interviewees talk the talk, but don’t walk the walk. They have great interviewing abilities but not the skills required to be successful in the specific position for which they are interviewing.
    • Even if the interviewer is well trained and prepared to conduct a strong interview, they can get caught up with an interviewee that seems very impressive on the surface, and end up making a bad hire.

    Preparing the Perfect Interview

    Step 5: Define decision rights

    Establish decision-making authority and veto power to mitigate post-interview conflicts over who has final say over a candidate’s status.

    Follow these steps to create a positive interview experience for all involved.

    Step 1: Define the ideal candidate profile; determine the attributes of the ideal candidate and their relative importance

    Define the attributes of the ideal candidate…

    Ideal candidate = Ability to do the job + Motivation to do the job + Fit

    Competencies

    • Education
    • Credentials
    • Technical skills
    • Career path
    • Salary expectations
    • Passion
    • Potential
    • Personality
    • Managerial style/preference

    Experiences

    • Years of service
    • Specific projects
    • Industry

    Data for these come from:

    • Interviews
    • Personality tests
    • Gut instinct or intuition

    Data for these come from:

    • Resumes
    • Interviews
    • Exercises and tests
    • References

    Caution: Evaluating for “organizational or cultural fit” can lead to interviewers falling into the trap of the “like me” bias, and excluding diverse candidates.

    …then determine the importance of the attributes.

    Non-negotiable = absolutely required for the job!

    Usually attributes that are hard to train, such as writing skills, or expensive to acquire after hire, such as higher education or specific technical skills.

    An Asset

    Usually attributes that can be trained, such as computer skills. It’s a bonus if the new hire has it.

    Nice-to-have

    Attributes that aren’t necessary for the job but beneficial. These could help in breaking final decision ties.

    Deal Breakers: Also discuss and decide on any deal breakers that would automatically exclude a candidate.

    The job description is not enough; meet with stakeholders to define and come to a consensus on the ideal candidate profile

    Definition of the Ideal Candidate

    • The Hiring Manager has a plan for the new hire and knows the criteria that will best fulfill that mandate.
    • The Executive team may have specific directives for what the ideal candidate should look like, depending on the level and critical nature of the position.
    • Industry standards, which are defined by regulatory bodies, are available for some positions. Use these to identify skills and abilities needed for the job.
    • Competitor information such as job descriptions and job reviews could provide useful data about a similar role in other organizations.
    • Exit interviews can offer insight into the most challenging aspects of the job and identify skills or abilities needed for success.
    • Current employees who hold the same or a similar position can explain the nuances of the day-to-day job and what attributes are most needed on the team.

    “The hardest work is accurately defining what kind of person is going to best perform this job. What are their virtues? If you’ve all that defined, the rest is not so tough.”

    – VP, Financial Services

    Use a scorecard to document the ideal candidate profile and help you select a superstar

    1. Download the Workbook and go to tab 6.1.
    2. Document the desired attributes for each category of assessment: Competencies, Experiences, Fit, and Motivation. You can find an Attribute Library on the next tab.
    3. Rank each attribute by level of priority: Required, Asset, or Nice-to-Have.
    4. Identify deal breakers that would automatically disqualify a candidate from moving forward.
    InputOutput
    • Job description
    • Stakeholder input
    • Ideal candidate persona
    MaterialsParticipants
    • Workbook
    • Hiring Managers

    To identify questions for screening interviews, use the Screening Interview Template

    A screening interview conducted by phone should have a set of common questions to identify qualified candidates for in-person interviews.

    The Screening Interview Template will help you develop a screening interview by providing:

    • Common screening questions that can be modified based on organizational needs and interview length.
    • Establishing an interview team.
    • A questionnaire format so that the same questions are asked of all candidates and responses can be recorded.

    Once completed, this template will help you or HR staff conduct candidate screening interviews with ease and consistency. Always do screening interviews over the phone or via video to save time and money.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Determine the goal of the screening interview – do you want to evaluate technical skills, communication skills, attitude, etc.? – and create questions based on this goal. If evaluating technical skill, have someone with technical competency conduct the interview.

    The image contains screenshots of the Screening Interview Template.

    Step 2: Choose interview types and techniques that best assess the ideal candidate attributes listed on the position scorecard

    There is no best interview type or technique for assessing candidates, but there could be a wrong one depending on the organization and job opening.

    • Understanding common interviewing techniques and types will help inform your own interviewing strategy and interview development.
    • Each interview technique and type has its own strengths and weakness and can be better suited for a particular organizational environment, type of job, or characteristic being assessed.
    The image contains a diagram to demonstrate the similarities and differences of Interview Technique and Interview Type. There is a Venn Diagram, the right circle is labelled: Interview Technique, and the right is: Interview Type. There is a double sided arrow below that has the following text: Unstructure, Semi-Structured, and Structured.

    Unstructured: A traditional method of interviewing that involves no constraints on the questions asked, no requirements for standardization, and a subjective assessment of the candidate. This format is the most prone to bias.

    Semi-Structured: A blend of structured and unstructured, where the interviewer will ask a small list of similar questions to all candidates along with some questions pertaining to the resume.

    Structured: An interview consisting of a standardized set of job-relevant questions and a scoring guide. The goal is to reduce interviewer bias and to help make an objective and valid decision about the best candidate.

    No matter which interview types or techniques you use, aim for it to be as structured as possible to increase its validity

    The validity of the interview increases as the degree of interview structure increases.

    Components of a highly structured interview include:

    1. Interview questions are derived from a job analysis (they are job related).
    2. Interview questions are standardized (all applicants are asked the same questions).
    3. Prompting, follow-up questioning, probing, and/or elaboration on questions are limited. Try to identify all prompts, follow-ups, and probes beforehand and include them in the interview guide so that all candidates get the same level of prompting and probing.
    4. Interview questions focus on behaviors or work samples rather than opinions or self-evaluations.
    5. Interviewer access to ancillary information (e.g. resumes, letters of reference, test scores, transcripts) is controlled. Sometimes limiting access to these documents can limit interviewer biases.
    6. Questions from the candidate are not allowed until after the interview. This allows the interviewer to stay on track and not go off the protocol.
    7. Each answer is rated during the interview using a rating scale tailored to the question (this is preferable to rating dimensions at the end of the interview and certainly preferable to just making an overall rating or ranking at the end).
    8. Rating scales are “anchored” with behavioral examples to illustrate scale points (e.g. examples of a “1,” “3,” or “5” answer).
    9. Total interview score is obtained by summing across scores for each of the questions.

    The more of these components your interview has, the more structured it is, and the more valid it will be.

    Step 3: Prepare interview questions to assess the attributes you are looking for in a candidate

    The purpose of interviewing is to assess, not just listen. Questions are what help you do this.

    Preparing questions in advance allows you to:

    • Match each question to a position requirement (included in your scorecard) to ensure that you assess all required attributes. Everything assessed should be job relevant!
    • Determine each question’s weighting, if applicable.
    • Give each candidate a chance to speak to all their job-relevant attributes.
    • Keep records should an unselected candidate decide to contest the decision.

    If you don’t prepare in advance:

    • You’ll be distracted thinking about what you are going to ask next and not be fully listening.
    • You likely won’t ask the same questions of all candidates, which impacts the ability to compare across candidates and doesn’t provide a fair process for everyone.
    • You likely won’t ask the questions you need to elicit the information needed to make the right decision.
    • You could ask illegal questions (see Acquire the Right Hires with Effective Interviewing for a list of questions not to ask in an interview).

    Use the Interview Question Planning Guide tab in the Candidate Interview Strategy and Planning Guide to prepare your interview questions.

    Use these tips to draft interview questions:

    • Use job analysis output, in particular the critical incident technique, to develop structured interview questions.
    • Search online or in books for example interview questions for the target position to inform interview question development. Just remember that candidates access these too, so be sure to ask for specific examples, include probing questions, and adapt or modify questions to change them.
    • Situational questions: The situation should be described in sufficient detail to allow an applicant to visualize it accurately and be followed by “what would you do?” Scoring anchors should reflect effective, typical, and ineffective behaviors.
    • Behavioral questions: Should assess a behavioral dimension (e.g. meeting deadlines) and apply to a variety of situations that share the underlying dimension (e.g. at work or school). Scoring anchors should be applicable to a variety of situations and reflect effective, typical, and ineffective behavior.

    Conduct an effective screening interview by listening to non-verbal cues and probing

    Follow these steps to conduct an effective screening interview:

    Introduce yourself and ask if now is a good time to talk. (Before calling, prepare your sales pitch on the organization and the position.)

    You want to catch candidates off guard so that they don’t have time to prepare scripted answers; however, you must be courteous to their schedule.

    Provide an overview of the position, then start asking pre-set questions. Take a lot of notes.

    It is important to provide candidates with as much information as possible about the position – they are deciding whether they are interested in the role as much as you are deciding whether they are suitable.

    Listen to how the questions are answered. Ask follow-up questions when appropriate and especially if the candidate seems to be holding something back.

    If there are long pauses or the candidate’s voice changes, there may be something they aren’t telling you that you should know.

    Be alert to inconsistencies between the resume and answers to the questions and address them.

    It’s important to get to the bottom of issues before the in-person interview. If dates, titles, responsibilities, etc. seem to be inconsistent, ask more questions.

    Ask candidates about their salary expectations.

    It’s important to ensure alignment of the salary expectations early on. If the expectations are much higher than the range, and the candidate doesn’t seem to be open to the lower range, there is no point interviewing them. This would be a waste of everyone’s time.

    Answer the applicant’s questions and conclude the interview.

    Wait until after the interview to rate the applicant.

    Don’t allow yourself to judge throughout the interview, or it could skew questions. Rate the applicant once the interview is complete.

    When you have a shortlist of candidates to invite to an in-person interview, use the Candidate Communication Template to guide you through proper phone and email communications.

    Don’t just prepare top-level interview questions; also prepare probing questions to probe to gain depth and clarity

    Use probing to drill down on what candidates say as much as possible and go beyond textbook answers.

    Question (traditional): “What would you identify as your greatest strength?”

    Answer: Ability to work on a team.

    Top-level interview questions set the stage for probing.

    Your interview script should contain the top two levels of questions in the pyramid and a few probes that you will likely need to ask. You can then drill down further depending on the candidate’s answers.

    Follow-Up Question:

    “Can you outline a particular example when you were able to exercise your teamwork skills to reach a team goal?”

    Probing questions start with asking what, when, who, why, and how, and gain insight into a candidate’s thought process, experiences, and successes.

    Probing Level 1:

    Probe around the what, how, who, when, and where. “How did you accomplish that?”

    How to develop probes? By anticipating the kinds of responses that candidates from different backgrounds or with different levels of experience are likely to give as a response to an interview question. Probes should provide a clear understanding of the situation, the behavior, and the outcome so that the response can be accurately scored. Common probes include:

    • What did you do? What was the outcome?
    • When did this take place (and how long did it take)?
    • Who was involved?
    • Were you leading or being led?
    • How did you accomplish what you did?
    • Why did you take those steps?

    Tailor probes to the candidate’s answers to evoke meaningful and insightful responses.

    Probing Level 2:

    Allow for some creativity.

    “What would you do differently if you were to do it again?”

    Conduct effective interviews and assessments

    Mitigate inherent biases of assessors by integrating formal assessments with objective anchors and clear criteria to create a more inclusive process.

    Consider leveraging behavioral interview questions in your interview to reduce bias.

    • In the past, companies were pushing the boundaries of the conventional interview, using unconventional questions to find top talent, e.g. “what color is your personality?” The logic was that the best people are the ones who don’t necessarily show perfectly on a resume, and they were intent on finding the best.
    • However, many companies have stopped using these questions after extensive statistical analysis revealed there was no correlation between candidates’ ability to answer them and their future performance on the job.
    • Asking behavioral interview questions based on the competency needs of the role is the best way to uncover if the candidates will be able to execute on the job.

    Assessments are created by people that have biases. This often means that assessments can be biased, especially with preferences towards a Western perspective. Even if the same assessments are administered, the questions will be interpreted differently by candidates with varying cultural backgrounds and lived experiences. If assessments do not account for this, it ultimately leads to favoring the answers of certain demographic groups, often ones similar to those who developed the assessment.

    Creating an interview question scorecard

    Attribute you are evaluating

    Probing questions prepared

    Area to take notes

    The image contains a screenshot of an Interview question scorecard.

    Exact question you will ask

    Place to record score

    Anchored scale with definitions of a poor, ok and great answer

    Step 4: Assemble an interview team

    HR and the direct reporting supervisor should always be part of the interview. Make a good impression with a good interview team.

    The must-haves:

    • The Future Manager should always be involved in the process. They should be comfortable with the new hire’s competencies and fit.
    • Human Resources should always be involved in the process – they maintain consistency, legality, and standardization. It’s their job to know the rules and follow them. HR may coordinate and maintain policy standards and/or join in assessing the candidate.
    • There should always be more than just one interviewer, even if it is not at the same time. This helps keep the process objective, allows for different opinions, and gives the interviewee exposure to multiple individuals in the company. But, try to limit the number of panel members to four or less.

    “At the end of the day, it’s the supervisor that has to live with the person, so any decision that does not involve the supervisor is a very flawed process.” – VP, Financial Services

    The nice-to-haves:

    • Future colleagues can offer benefits to both the interviewee and the colleague by:
      • Giving the candidate some insight into what their day-to-day job would be.
      • Relaxing the candidate; allowing for a less formal, less intimidating conversation.
      • Introducing potential teammates for a position that is highly collaborative.
      • Offering the interviewer an excellent professional development opportunity – a chance to present their understanding of what they do.
    • Executives should take part in interviewing for executive hiring, individuals that will report to an executive, or for positions that are extremely important. Executive time is scarce and expensive, so only use it when absolutely necessary.

    Record the interview team details in the Candidate Interview Strategy and Planning Guide template.

    Assign interviewers roles inside and outside the actual interview

    Define Interview Process Roles

    Who Should… Contact candidates to schedule interviews or communicate decisions?

    Who Should… Be responsible for candidate welcomes, walk-outs, and hand-offs between interviews?

    Who Should… Define and communicate each stakeholder’s role?

    Who Should… Chair the preparation and debrief meetings and play the role of the referee when trying to reach a consensus?

    Define Interview Roles

    • Set a role for each interviewer so they know what to focus on and where they fit into the process (e.g. Interviewer A will assess fit). Don’t ad hoc the process and allow everyone to interview based on their own ideas.
    • Consider interviewer qualifications and the impact of the new employee on each interviewer, when deciding the roles of each interviewer (i.e. who will interview for competency and who will interview for fit).
      • For example, managers may be most impacted by technical competencies and should be the interviewer to evaluate the candidate for technical competency.

    “Unless you’ve got roles within the panel really detailed and agreed upon, for example, who is going to take the lead on what area of questions, you end up with a situation where nobody is in charge or accountable for the final interview assessment." – VP, Financial Services

    Info-Tech Insight

    Try a Two Lens Assessment: One interviewer assesses the candidate as a project leader while another assesses them as a people leader for a question such as “Give me an example of when you exercised your leadership skills with a junior team member.”

    Step 5: Set decision rights in stone and communicate them in advance to manage stakeholder expectations and limit conflict

    All interviewers must understand their decision-making authority prior to the interview. Misunderstandings can lead to resentment and conflict.

    It is typical and acceptable that you, as the direct reporting manager, should have veto power, as do some executives.

    Veto Power

    Direct Supervisor or Manager

    Decision Makers: Must Have Consensus

    Other Stakeholders

    Direct Supervisor’s Boss

    Direct Supervisor

    Contributes Opinion

    HR Representative

    Peer

    After the preliminary interview, HR should not be involved in making the decision unless they have a solid understanding of the position.

    Peers can make an unfair assessment due to perceived competition with a candidate. Additionally, if a peer doesn’t want a candidate to be hired and the direct supervisor does hire the candidate, the peer may hold resentment against that candidate and set the team up for conflict.

    The decision should rest on those who will interact with the candidate on a daily basis and who manage the team or department that the candidate will be joining.

    The decisions being made can include whether or not to move a candidate onto the next phase of the hiring process or a final hiring decision. Deciding decision rights in advance defines accountability for an effective interview process.

    Create your interview team, assessments, and objective anchor scale

    1. Download the Behavioral Interview Question Library as a reference.
    2. On tab 9 of your workbook, document all the members of the team and their respective roles in the interview process. Fill in the decision-making authority section to ensure every team member is held accountable to their assigned tasks and understands how their input will be used.
    3. For each required attribute in the Ideal Candidate Scorecard, chose one to two questions from the library that can properly evaluate that attribute.
    4. Copy and paste the questions and probing questions into the Interview Guide Template.
    5. Create an objective anchor scale and clearly define what a poor, ok, and great answer to each question is.

    Download the Behavioral Interview Question Library

    Input Output
    • List of possible team members
    • Ideal Candidate Scorecard
    • Finalized hiring panel
    • Finalized interview and assessment process
    Materials Participants
    • IT Behavioral Interview Question Library
    • Workbook
    • Interview Guide Template
    • IT leadership team
    • IT staff members

    Conduct an effective, professional, and organized in-person interview

    Give candidates a warm, genuine greeting. Introduce them to other interviewers present. Offer a drink. Make small talk.

    “There are some real advantages to creating a comfortable climate for the candidate; the obvious respect for the individual, but people really let their guard down.”

    – HR Director, Financial Services

    Give the candidate an overview of the process, length, and what to expect of the interview. Indicate to the candidate that notes will be taken during the interview.

    If shorter than an hour, you probably aren’t probing enough or even asking the right questions. It also looks bad to candidates if the interview is over quickly.

    Start with the first question in the interview guide and make notes directly on the interview guide (written or typed) for each question.

    Take lots of notes! You think you’ll remember what was said, but you won’t. It also adds transparency and helps with documentation.

    Ask the questions in the order presented for interview consistency. Probe and clarify as needed (see next slide).

    Keep control of the interview by curtailing any irrelevant or long-winded responses.

    After all interview questions are complete, ask candidates if there was anything about their qualifications that was missed that they want to highlight.

    Lets you know they understand the job and gives them the feeling they’ve put everything on the table.

    Ask if the candidate has any questions. Respond to the questions asked.

    Answer candidate questions honestly because fit works both ways. Ensure candidates leave with a better sense of the job, expectations, and organizational culture.

    Review the compensation structure for the position and provide a realistic preview of the job and organization.

    Provide each candidate with a fair chance by maintaining a consistent interview process.

    Tell interviewees what happens next in the process, the expected time frame, and how they will be informed of the outcome. Escort them out and thank them for the interview.

    The subsequent slides provide additional detail on these eight steps to conducting an effective interview.

    Avoid these common biases and mistakes

    Common Biases

    Like-me effect: An often-unconscious preference for, and unfairly positive evaluation of, a candidate based on shared interests, personalities, and experiences, etc.

    Status effect: Overrating candidates based on the prestige of previously held positions, titles, or schools attended.

    Recency bias: Placing greater emphasis on interviews held closer to the decision-making date.

    Contrast effect: Rating candidates relative to those who precede or follow them during the interview process, rather than against previously determined data.

    Solution

    Assess candidates by using existing competency-based criteria.

    Common Mistakes

    Negative tone: Starting the interview on a negative or stressful note may derail an otherwise promising candidate.

    Poor interview management: Letting the candidate digress may leave some questions unanswered and reduce the interview value.

    Reliance of first impressions: Basing decisions on first impressions undermines the objectivity of competency-based selection.

    Failure to ask probing questions: Accepting general answers without asking follow-up questions reduces the evidentiary value of the interview.

    Solution

    Follow the structured interview process you designed and practiced.

    Ask the questions in the order presented in the interview guide, and probe and clarify as needed

    Do...

    Don’t…

    Take control of the interview by politely interrupting to clarify points or keep the interviewee on topic.

    Use probing to drill down on responses and ask for clarification. Ask who, what, when, why, and how.

    Be cognizant of confidentiality issues. Ask for a sample of work from a past position.

    Focus on knowledge or information gaps from previous interviews that need to be addressed in the interview.

    Ensure each member of a panel interview speaks in turn and the lead is given due respect to moderate.

    Be mean when probing. Intimidation actually works against you and is stressful for candidates. When you’re friendly, candidates will actually open up more.

    Interrupt or undermine other panel members. Their comments and questions are just as valid as yours are, and treating others unprofessionally gives a bad impression to the candidate.

    Ask illegal questions. Questions about things like religion, disability, and marital and family status are off limits.

    When listening to candidate responses, watch for tone, body language, and red flags

    Do...

    While listening to responses, also watch out for red and yellow flags.

    Listen to how candidates talk about their previous bosses – you want it to be mainly positive. If their discussion of past bosses reflects a strong sense of self-entitlement or a consistent theme of victimization, this could be a theme in their behavior and make them hard to work with.

    Red Flag

    A concern about something that would keep you from hiring the person.

    Yellow Flag

    A concern that needs to be addressed, but wouldn’t keep you from hiring the person.

    Pay attention to body language and tone. They can tell you a lot about candidate motivation and interest.

    Listen to what candidates want to improve. It’s an opportunity to talk about development and advancement opportunities in the organization.

    Not all candidates have red flags, but it is important to keep them in mind to identify potential issues with the candidate before they are hired.

    Don’t…

    Talk too much! You are there to listen. Candidates should do about 80% of the talking so you can adequately evaluate them. Be friendly, but ensure to spend the time allotted assessing, not chatting.

    If you talk too much, you may end up hiring a weak candidate because you didn’t perceive weaknesses or not hire a strong candidate because you didn’t identify strengths.

    What if you think you sense a red or yellow flag?

    Following the interview, immediately discuss the situation with others involved in the recruitment process or those familiar with the position, such as HR, another hiring manager, or a current employee in the role. They can help evaluate if it’s truly a matter of concern.

    Increase hiring success: Give candidates a positive perception of the organization in the interview

    Great candidates want to work at great organizations.

    When the interviewer makes a positive impression on a candidate and provides a positive impression of the organization it carries forward after they are hired.

    In addition, better candidates can be referred over the course of time due to higher quality networking.

    As much as choosing the right candidate is important to you, make sure the right candidate wants to choose you and work for your organization.

    The image contains a screenshot of a graph to demonstrate the percent of successful hires relates strongly to interviewers giving candidates a positive perception of the organization.

    Interview advice seems like common sense, but it’s often not heeded, resulting in poor interviews

    Don’t…

    Believe everything candidates say. Most candidates embellish and exaggerate to find the answers they think you want. Use probing to drill down to specifics and take them off their game.

    Ask gimmicky questions like “what color is your soul?” Responses to these questions won’t give you any information about the job. Candidates don’t like them either!

    Focus too much on the resume. If the candidate is smart, they’ve tailored it to match the job posting, so of course the person sounds perfect for the job. Read it in advance, highlight specific things you want to ask, then ignore it.

    Oversell the job or organization. Obviously you want to give candidates a positive impression, but don’t go overboard because this could lead to unhappy hires who don’t receive what you sold them. Candidates need to evaluate fit just as much as you.

    Get distracted by a candidate’s qualifications and focus only on their ability to do the job. Just because they are qualified does not mean they have the attitude or personality to fit the job or culture.

    Show emotion at any physical handicap. You can’t discriminate based on physical disability, so protect the organization by not drawing attention to it. Even if you don’t say anything, your facial expression may.

    Bring a bad day or excess baggage into the interview, or be abrupt, rushed, or uninterested in the interview. This is rude behavior and will leave a negative impression with candidates, which could impact your chances of hiring them.

    Submit to first impression bias because you’ll spend the rest of the interview trying to validate your first impression, wasting your time and the candidate’s. Remain as objective as possible and stick to the interview guide to stay focused on the task at hand.

    “To the candidate, if you are meeting person #3 and you’re hearing questions that person #1 and #2 asked, the company doesn’t look too hot or organized.” – President, Recruiting Firm

    Practice behavioral interviews

    1. In groups of at least three:
    • Assign one person to act as the manager conducting the interview, a second person to act as the candidate, and a third to observe.
    • The observer will provide feedback to the manager at the end of the role play based on the information you just learned.
    • Observers – please give feedback on the probing questions and body language.
  • Managers, select an interview question from the list your group put together during the previous exercise. Take a few minutes to think about potential probing questions you could follow up with to dig for more information.
  • Candidates, try to act like a real candidate. Please don’t make it super easy on the managers – but don’t make it impossible either!
  • Once the question has been asked and answered:
    • How did it go?
    • Were you able to get the candidate to speak in specifics rather than generalities? What tips do you have for others?
    • What didn’t go so well? Any surprises?
    • What would you do differently next time?
    • If this was a real hiring situation, would the information you got from just that one question help you make a hiring decision for the role?
  • Now switch roles and select a new interview question to use for this round. Repeat until everyone has had a chance to practice.
  • Input Output
    • Interview questions and scorecard
    • Practice interviews
    Materials Participants
    • IT Behavioral Interview Question Library
    • Workbook
    • Hiring Manager
    • Interview Panel Members

    Download the Behavioral Interview Question Library

    Record best practices, effective questions, and candidate insights for future use and current strategy

    Results and insights gained from evaluations need to be recorded and assessed to gain value from them going forward.

    • To optimize evaluation, all feedback should be forwarded to a central point so that the information can be shared with all stakeholders. HR can serve in this role.
    • Peer evaluations should be shared shortly after the interview. Immediate feedback that represents all the positive and negative responses is instructional for interviewers to consider right away.
    • HR can take a proactive approach to sharing information and analyzing and improving the interview process in order to collaborate with hiring departments for better talent management.
    • Collecting information about effective and ineffective interview questions will guide future interview revision and development efforts.

    Evaluations Can Inform Strategic Planning and Professional Development

    Strategic Planning

    • Survey data can be used to inform strategic planning initiatives in recruiting.
    • Use the information to build a case to the executive team for training, public relations initiatives, or better candidate management systems.

    Professional Development

    • Survey data from all evaluations should be used to inform future professional development initiatives.
    • Interview areas where all team members show weaknesses should be training priorities.
    • Individual weaknesses should be integrated into each professional development plan.

    Want to learn more?

    Recruit IT Talent

    • Improve candidate experience to hire top IT talent.

    Recruit and Retain More Women in IT

    • Gender diversity is directly correlated to IT performance.

    Recruit and Retain People of Color in IT

    • Good business, not just good philanthropy.

    Develop a Comprehensive Onboarding Plan

    Drive employee engagement and retention with a robust program that acclimates, guides, and develops new hires.

    Onboarding should pick up where candidate experience leaves off

    Do not confuse onboarding with orientation

    Onboarding ≠ Orientation

    Onboarding is more than just orientation. Orientation is typically a few days of completing paperwork, reading manuals, and learning about the company’s history, strategic goals, and culture. By contrast, onboarding is three to twelve months dedicated to welcoming, acclimating, guiding, and developing new employees – with the ideal duration reflecting the time to productivity for the role.

    A traditional orientation approach provides insufficient focus on the organizational identification, socialization, and job clarity that a new hire requires. This is a missed opportunity to build engagement, drive productivity, and increase organizational commitment. This can result in early disengagement and premature departure.

    Effective onboarding positively impacts the organization and bottom line

    Over the long term, effective onboarding has a positive impact on revenue and decreases costs.

    The benefits of onboarding:

    • Save money and frustration
      • Shorten processing time, reduce administrative costs, and improve compliance.
    • Boost revenue
      • Help new employees become productive faster – also reduce the strain on existing employees who would normally be overseeing them or covering a performance shortfall.
    • Drive engagement and reduce turnover
      • Quickly acclimate new hires to your organization’s environment, culture, and values.
    • Reinforce culture and employer brand
      • Ensure that new hires feel a connection to the organization’s culture.

    Onboarding drives new hire engagement from day one

    The image contains a graph to demonstrate the increase in overall engagement in relation to onboarding.

    When building an onboarding program, retain the core aims: acclimate, guide, and develop

    The image contains a picture of a circle with a smaller circle inside it, and a smaller circle inside that one. The smallest circle is labelled Acclimate, the medium sized circle is labelled Guide, and the biggest circle is labelled Develop.

    Help new hires feel connected to the organization by clearly articulating the mission, vision, values, and what the company does. Help them understand the business model, the industry, and who their competitors are. Help them feel connected to their new team members by providing opportunities for socialization and a support network.

    Help put new hires on the path to high performance by clearly outlining their role in the organization and how their performance will be evaluated.

    Help new hires receive the experience and training they require to become high performers by helping them build needed competencies.

    We recommend a three-to-twelve-month onboarding program, with the performance management aspect of onboarding extending out to meet the standard organizational performance management cycle.

    Info-Tech Insight

    The length of the onboarding program should align with the average time to productivity for the role(s). Consider the complexity of the role, the industry, and the level of the new hire when determining program length.

    For example, call center workers who are selling a straight-forward product may only require a three-month onboarding, while senior leaders may require a year-long program.

    Watch for signs that you aren’t effectively acclimating, guiding, and developing new hires

    Our primary and secondary research identified the following as the most commonly stated reasons why employees leave organizations prematurely. These issues will be addressed throughout the next section.

    Acclimate

    Guide

    Develop

    • Onboarding experience is misaligned from the employer’s brand.
    • Socialization and/or integration into the existing culture is left to the employee.
    • Key role expectations or role usefulness is not clearly communicated.
    • Company strategy is unclear.
    • Opportunities for advancement are unclear.
    • Coaching, counseling, and/or support from co-workers and/or management is lacking.
    • The organization fails to demonstrate that it cares about the new employee’s needs.

    “Onboarding is often seen as an entry-level HR function. It needs to rise in importance because it’s the first impression of the organization and can be much more powerful than we sometimes give it credit for. It should be a culture building and branding program.” – Doris Sims, SPHR, The Succession Consultant, and Author, Creative Onboarding Programs

    Use the onboarding tabs in the workbook to evaluate and redesign the onboarding program

    1. On tab 10, brainstorm challenges that face the organization's current onboarding program. Identify if they fall into the "acclimate," "guide," or "develop" category. Next, record the potential impact of this challenge on the overall effectiveness of the onboarding program.
    2. On tab 11, record each existing onboarding activity. Then, identify if that activity will be kept or if it should be retired. Next, document if the activity fell into the "acclimate," "guide," or "develop" category.
    3. On tab 12, document gaps that currently exist in the onboarding program. Modify the timeline along the side of the tab to ensure it reflects the timeline you have identified.
    4. On tab 13, document the activities that will occur in the new onboarding program. This should be a combination of current activities that you want to retain and new activities that will be added to address the gaps noted on tab 12. For each activity, identify if it will fall in the acclimate, guide, or develop section. Add any additional notes. Before moving on, make sure that there are no categories that have no activities (e.g. no guide activities).
    Input Output
    • Existing onboarding activities
    • Determine new onboarding activities
    • Map out onboarding responsibilities
    Materials Participants
    • Workbook
    • Hiring Managers
    • HR

    Review the administrative aspects of onboarding and determine how to address the challenges

    The image contains tabs, three main large tabs are labelled: Acclimate, Guide, and Develop. There are smaller tabs in between that are in relation to the three main ones.

    Sample challenges

    Potential solutions

    Some paperwork cannot be completed digitally (e.g. I-9 form in the US).

    Where possible, complete forms with digital signatures (e.g. DocuSign). Where not possible, begin the process earlier and mail required forms to employees to sign and return, or scan and email for the employee to print and return.

    Required compliance training material is not available virtually.

    Seek online training options where possible. Determine the most-critical training needs and prioritize the replication of materials in audio/video format (e.g. recorded lecture) and distribute virtually.

    Employees may not have access to their equipment immediately due to shipping or supply issues.

    Delay employee start dates until you can set them up with the proper equipment and access needed to do their job.

    New hires can’t get answers to their questions about benefits information and setup.

    Schedule a meeting with an HR representative or benefits vendor to explain how benefits will work and how to navigate employee self-service or other tools and resources related to their benefits.

    Info-Tech Insight

    One of the biggest challenges for remote new hires is the inability to casually ask questions or have conversations without feeling like they’re interrupting. Until they have a chance to get settled, providing formal opportunities for questions can help address this.

    Review how company information is shared during onboarding and how to address the challenges

    The image contains tabs, three main large tabs are labelled: Acclimate, Guide, and Develop. There are smaller tabs in between that are in relation to the three main ones.

    Sample challenges

    Potential solutions

    Key company information such as organizational history, charts, or the vision, mission, and values cannot be clearly learned by employees on their own.

    Have the new hire’s manager call to walk through the important company information to provide a personal touch and allow the new hire to ask questions and get to know their new manager.

    Keeping new hires up to date on crisis communications is important, but too much information may overwhelm them or cause unnecessary stress.

    Sharing the future of the organization is a critical part of the company information stage of onboarding and the ever-changing nature of the COVID-19 crisis is informing many organizations’ future right now. Be honest but avoid over-sharing plans that may change.

    New hires can’t get answers to their questions about benefits information and setup.

    Schedule a meeting with an HR representative or benefits vendor to explain how benefits will work and how to navigate employee self-service or other tools and resources related to their benefits.

    Review the socialization aspects of onboarding and determine how to address the challenges

    The image contains tabs, three main large tabs are labelled: Acclimate, Guide, and Develop. There are smaller tabs in between that are in relation to the three main ones.

    Sample challenges

    Potential solutions

    Team introductions via a team lunch or welcome event are typically done in person.

    Provide managers with a calendar of typical socialization events in the first few weeks of onboarding and provide instructions and ideas for how to schedule replacement events over videoconferencing.

    New hires may not have a point of contact for informal questions or needs if their peers aren’t around them to help.

    If it doesn’t already exist, create a virtual buddy program and provide instructions for managers to select a buddy from the new hire’s team. Explain that their role is to field informal questions about the company, team, and anything else and that they should book weekly meetings with the new hire to stay in touch.

    New hires will not have an opportunity to learn or become a part of the informal decision-making networks at the organization.

    Hiring managers should consider key network connections that new hires will need by going through their own internal network and asking other team members for recommendations.

    New hires will not be able to casually meet people around the office.

    Provide the employee with a list of key contacts for them to reach out to and book informal virtual coffee chats to introduce themselves.

    Adapt the Guide phase of onboarding to a virtual environment

    The image contains tabs, three main large tabs are labelled: Acclimate, Guide, and Develop. There are smaller tabs in between that are in relation to the three main ones.

    Sample challenges

    Potential solutions

    Performance management (PM) processes have been paused given the current crisis.

    Communicate to managers that new hires still need to be onboarded to the organization’s performance management process and that goals and feedback need to be introduced and the review process outlined even if it’s not currently happening.

    Goals and expectations differ or have been reprioritized during the crisis.

    Ask managers to explain the current situation at the organization and any temporary changes to goals and expectations as a result of new hires.

    Remote workers often require more-frequent feedback than is mandated in current PM processes.

    Revamp PM processes to include daily or bi-weekly touchpoints for managers to provide feedback and coaching for new hires for at least their first six months.

    Managers will not be able to monitor new hire work as effectively as usual.

    Ensure there is a formal approach for how employees will keep their managers updated on what they're working on and how it's going, for example, daily scrums or task-tracking software.

    For more information on adapting performance management to a virtual environment, see Info-Tech’s Performance Management for Emergency Work-From-Home research.

    Take an inventory of training and development in the onboarding process and select critical activities

    The image contains tabs, three main large tabs are labelled: Acclimate, Guide, and Develop. There are smaller tabs in between that are in relation to the three main ones.

    Categorize the different types of formal and informal training in the onboarding process into the following three categories. For departmental and individual training, speak to managers to understand what is required on a department and role basis:

    Organizational

    Departmental

    Individual

    For example:

    • Employee self-service overview
    • Health and safety/compliance training
    • Core competencies

    For example:

    • Software training (e.g. Salesforce)
    • Job shadowing to learn how to work equipment or to learn processes

    For example:

    • Mentoring
    • External courses
    • Support to work toward a certification

    In a crisis, not every training can be translated to a virtual environment in the short term. It’s also important to focus on critical learning activities versus the non-critical. Prioritize the training activities by examining the learning outcomes of each and asking:

    • What organizational training does every employee need to be a productive member of the organization?
    • What departmental or individual training do new hires need to be successful in their role?

    Lower priority or non-critical activities can be used to fill gaps in onboarding schedules or as extra activities to be completed if the new hire finds themselves with unexpected downtime to fill.

    Determine how onboarding training will be delivered virtually

    The image contains tabs, three main large tabs are labelled: Acclimate, Guide, and Develop. There are smaller tabs in between that are in relation to the three main ones.

    Who will facilitate virtual training sessions?

    • For large onboarding cohorts, consider live delivery via web conferencing where possible. This will create a more engaging training program and will allow new hires to interact with and ask questions of the presenter.
    • For individual new hires or small cohorts, have senior leaders or key personnel from across the organization record different trainings that are relevant for their role.
      • For example, training sessions about organizational culture can be delivered by the CEO or other senior leader, while sales training could be delivered by a sales executive.

      If there is a lack of resources, expertise, or time, outsource digital training to a content provider or through your LMS.

    What existing or free tools can be leveraged to immediately support digital training?

    • Laptops and PowerPoint to record training sessions that are typically delivered in-person
    • YouTube/Vimeo to host recorded lecture-format training
    • Company intranet to host links and files needed to complete training
    • Web conferencing software to host live training/orientation sessions (e.g. Webex)
    • LMS to host and track completion of learning content

    Want to learn more?

    Recruit IT Talent

    • Improve candidate experience to hire top IT talent.

    Recruit and Retain More Women in IT

    • Gender diversity is directly correlated to IT performance.

    Recruit and Retain People of Color in IT

    • Good business, not just good philanthropy.

    Adapt Your Onboarding Process to a Virtual Environment

    • Develop short-term solutions with a long-term outlook to quickly bring in new talent.

    Bibliography

    2021 Recruiter Nation Report. Survey Analysis, Jobvite, 2021. Web.

    “5 Global Stats Shaping Recruiting Trends.” The Undercover Recruiter, 2022. Web.

    Barr, Tavis, Raicho Bojilov, and Lalith Munasinghe. "Referrals and Search Efficiency: Who Learns What and When?" The University of Chicago Press, Journal of Labor Economics, vol. 37, no. 4, Oct. 2019. Web.

    “How to grow your team better, faster with an employee referral program.” Betterup, 10 Jan. 2022. Web.

    “Employee Value Proposition: How 25 Companies Define Their EVP.” Built In, 2021. Web.

    Global Leadership Forecast 2021. Survey Report, DDI World, 2021. Web.

    “Connecting Unemployed Youth with Organizations That Need Talent.” Harvard Business Review, 3 November 2016. Web.

    Ku, Daniel. “Social Recruiting: Everything You Need To Know for 2022.” PostBeyond, 26 November 2021. Web.

    Ladders Staff. “Shedding light on the job search.” Ladders, 20 May 2013. Web.

    Merin. “Campus Recruitment – Meaning, Benefits & Challenges.” HR Shelf, 1 February 2022. Web.

    Mobile Recruiting. Smart Recruiters, 2020. Accessed March 2022.

    Roddy, Seamus. “5 Employee Referral Program Strategies to Hire Top Talent.” Clutch, 22 April 2020. Web.

    Sinclair, James. “What The F*dge: That's Your Stranger Recruiting Budget?” LinkedIn, 11 November 2019. Web.

    “Ten Employer Examples of EVPs.” Workology, 2022. Web

    “The Higher Cost of a Bad Hire.” Robert Half, 15 March 2021. Accessed March 2022.

    Trost, Katy. “Hiring with a 90% Success Rate.” Katy Trost, Medium, 8 August 2022. Web.

    “Using Social Media for Talent Acquisition.” SHRM, 20 Sept. 2017. Web.

    Develop a Business Continuity Plan

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}411|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.1/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $37,093 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 30 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: DR and Business Continuity
    • Parent Category Link: /business-continuity
    • Recent crises have increased executive awareness and internal pressure to create a business continuity plan (BCP).
    • Industry and government-driven regulations require evidence of sound business continuity practices.
    • Customers demand their vendors provide evidence of a workable BCP prior to signing a contract.
    • IT leaders, because of their cross-functional view and experience with incident management and DR, are often asked to lead BCP efforts.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • BCP requires input from multiple departments with different and sometimes conflicting objectives. There are typically few, if any, dedicated resources for BCP, so it can't be a full-time, resource-intensive project.
    • As an IT leader you have the skill set and organizational knowledge to lead a BCP project, but ultimately business leaders need to own the BCP – they know their processes, and therefore, their requirements to resume business operations better than anyone else.
    • The traditional approach to BCP is a massive project that most organizations can’t execute without hiring a consultant. To execute BCP in-house, carve up the task into manageable pieces as outlined in this blueprint.

    Impact and Result

    • Implement a structured and repeatable process that you apply to one business unit at a time to keep BCP planning efforts manageable.
    • Use the results of the pilot to identify gaps in your recovery plans and reduce overall continuity risk while continuing to assess specific risks as you repeat the process with additional business units.
    • Enable business leaders to own the BCP going forward. Develop a template that the rest of the organization can use.
    • Leverage BCP outcomes to refine IT DRP recovery objectives and achieve DRP-BCP alignment.

    Develop a Business Continuity Plan Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should develop a business continuity plan, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Identify BCP maturity and document process dependencies

    Assess current maturity, establish a team, and choose a pilot business unit. Identify business processes, dependencies, and alternatives.

    • BCP Maturity Scorecard
    • BCP Pilot Project Charter Template
    • BCP Business Process Workflows Example (Visio)
    • BCP Business Process Workflows Example (PDF)

    2. Conduct a BIA to determine acceptable RTOs and RPOs

    Define an objective impact scoring scale, estimate the impact of downtime, and set recovery targets.

    • BCP Business Impact Analysis Tool

    3. Document the recovery workflow and projects to close gaps

    Build a workflow of the current steps for business recovery. Identify gaps and risks to recovery. Brainstorm and prioritize solutions to address gaps and mitigate risks.

    • BCP Tabletop Planning Template (Visio)
    • BCP Tabletop Planning Template (PDF)
    • BCP Project Roadmap Tool
    • BCP Relocation Checklists

    4. Extend the results of the pilot BCP and implement governance

    Present pilot project results and next steps. Create BCMS teams. Update and maintain BCMS documentation.

    • BCP Pilot Results Presentation
    • BCP Summary
    • Business Continuity Teams and Roles Tool

    5. Appendix: Additional BCP tools and templates

    Use these tools and templates to assist in the creation of your BCP.

    • BCP Recovery Workflow Example (Visio)
    • BCP Recovery Workflow Example (PDF)
    • BCP Notification, Assessment, and Disaster Declaration Plan
    • BCP Business Process Workarounds and Recovery Checklists
    • Business Continuity Management Policy
    • Business Unit BCP Prioritization Tool
    • Industry-Specific BIA Guidelines
    • BCP-DRP Maintenance Checklist
    • Develop a COVID-19 Pandemic Response Plan Storyboard
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Develop a Business Continuity Plan

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Define BCP Scope, Objectives, and Stakeholders

    The Purpose

    Define BCP scope, objectives, and stakeholders.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Prioritize BCP efforts and level-set scope with key stakeholders.

    Activities

    1.1 Assess current BCP maturity.

    1.2 Identify key business processes to include in scope.

    1.3 Flowchart key business processes to identify business processes, dependencies, and alternatives.

    Outputs

    BCP Maturity Scorecard: measure progress and identify gaps.

    Business process flowcharts: review, optimize, and allow for knowledge transfer of processes.

    Identify workarounds for common disruptions to day-to-day continuity.

    2 Define RTOs and RPOs Based on Your BIA

    The Purpose

    Define RTOs and RPOs based on your BIA.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Set recovery targets based business impact, and illustrate the importance of BCP efforts via the impact of downtime.

    Activities

    2.1 Define an objective scoring scale to indicate different levels of impact.

    2.2 Estimate the impact of downtime.

    2.3 Determine acceptable RTO/RPO targets for business processes based on business impact.

    Outputs

    BCP Business Impact Analysis: objective scoring scale to assess cost, goodwill, compliance, and safety impacts.

    Apply the scoring scale to estimate the impact of downtime on business processes.

    Acceptable RTOs/RPOs to dictate recovery strategy.

    3 Create a Recovery Workflow

    The Purpose

    Create a recovery workflow.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Build an actionable, high-level, recovery workflow that can be adapted to a variety of different scenarios.

    Activities

    3.1 Conduct a tabletop exercise to determine current recovery procedures.

    3.2 Identify and prioritize projects to close gaps and mitigate recovery risks.

    3.3 Evaluate options for command centers and alternate business locations (i.e. BC site).

    Outputs

    Recovery flow diagram – current and future state

    Identify gaps and recovery risks.

    Create a project roadmap to close gaps.

    Evaluate requirements for alternate business sites.

    4 Extend the Results of the Pilot BCP and Implement Governance

    The Purpose

    Extend the results of the pilot BCP and implement governance.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Outline the actions required for the rest of your BCMS, and the required effort to complete those actions, based on the results of the pilot.

    Activities

    4.1 Summarize the accomplishments and required next steps to create an overall BCP.

    4.2 Identify required BCM roles.

    4.3 Create a plan to update and maintain your overall BCP.

    Outputs

    Pilot BCP Executive Presentation

    Business Continuity Team Roles & Responsibilities

    3. Maintenance plan and BCP templates to complete the relevant documentation (BC Policy, BCP Action Items, Recovery Workflow, etc.)

    Further reading

    Develop a Business Continuity Plan

    Streamline the traditional approach to make BCP development manageable and repeatable.

    Analyst Perspective

    A BCP touches every aspect of your organization, making it potentially the most complex project you’ll take on. Streamline this effort or you won’t get far.

    None of us needs to look very far to find a reason to have an effective business continuity plan.

    From pandemics to natural disasters to supply chain disruptions to IT outages, there’s no shortage of events that can disrupt your complex and interconnected business processes. How in the world can anyone build a plan to address all these threats?

    Don’t try to boil the ocean. Use these tactics to streamline your BCP project and stay on track:

    • Focus on one business unit at a time. Keep the effort manageable, establish a repeatable process, and produce deliverables that provide a starting point for the rest of the organization.
    • Don’t start with an extensive risk analysis. It takes too long and at the end you’ll still need a plan to resume business operations following a disruption. Rather than trying to predict what could cause a disruption, focus on how to recover.
    • Keep your BCP documentation concise. Use flowcharts, checklists, and diagrams instead of traditional manuals.

    No one can predict every possible disruption, but by following the guidance in this blueprint, you can build a flexible continuity plan that allows you to withstand the threats your organization may face.

    Frank Trovato

    Research Director,
    IT Infrastructure & Operations Practice
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Andrew Sharp

    Senior Research Analyst,
    IT Infrastructure & Operations Practice
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    • Recent crises have increased executive awareness and internal pressure to create a BCP.
    • Industry- and government-driven regulations require evidence of sound business continuity practices.
    • Customers demand their vendors provide evidence of a workable BCP prior to signing a contract.

    IT leaders, because of their cross-functional view and experience with incident management and DR, are often asked to lead BCP efforts.

    Common Obstacles

    • IT managers asked to lead BCP efforts are dealing with processes and requirements beyond IT and outside of their control.
    • BCP requires input from multiple departments with different and sometimes conflicting objectives.
    • Typically there are few, if any, dedicated resources for BCP, so it can't be a full-time, resource-intensive project.

    Info-Tech’s Approach

    • Focus on implementing a structured and repeatable process that can be applied to one business unit at a time to avoid BCP from becoming an overwhelming project.
    • Enable business leaders to own the BCP going forward by establishing a template that the rest of the organization can follow.
    • Leverage BCP outcomes to refine IT DRP recovery objectives and achieve DRP-BCP alignment.

    Info-Tech Insight

    As an IT leader you have the skill set and organizational knowledge to lead a BCP project, but you must enable business leaders to own their department’s BCP practices and outputs. They know their processes and, therefore, their requirements to resume business operations better than anyone else.

    Use this research to create business unit BCPs and structure your overall BCP

    A business continuity plan (BCP) consists of separate but related sub-plans, as illustrated below. This blueprint enables you to:

    • Develop a BCP for a selected business unit (as a pilot project), and thereby establish a methodology that can be repeated for remaining business units.
    • Through the BCP process, clarify requirements for an IT disaster recovery plan (DRP). Refer to Info-Tech’s Disaster Recovery Planning workshop for instructions on how to create an IT DRP.
    • Implement ongoing business continuity management to govern BCP, DRP, and crisis management.

    Overall Business Continuity Plan

    IT Disaster Recovery Plan

    A plan to restore IT application and infrastructure services following a disruption.

    Info-Tech’s disaster recovery planning blueprint provides a methodology for creating the IT DRP. Leverage this blueprint to validate and provide inputs for your IT DRP.

    BCP for Each Business Unit

    A set of plans to resume business processes for each business unit. This includes:

    • Identifying business processes and dependencies.
    • Defining an acceptable recovery timeline based on a business impact analysis.
    • Creating a step-by-step recovery workflow.

    Crisis Management Plan

    A plan to manage a wide range of crises, from health and safety incidents to business disruptions to reputational damage.

    Info-Tech’s Implement Crisis Management Best Practices blueprint provides a framework for planning a response to any crisis, from health and safety incidents to reputational damage.

    IT leaders asked to develop a BCP should start with an IT Disaster Recovery Plan

    It’s a business continuity plan. Why should you start continuity planning with IT?

    1. IT services are a critical dependency for most business processes. Creating an IT DRP helps you mitigate a key risk to continuity quicker than it takes to complete your overall BCP, and you can then focus on other dependencies such as people, facilities, and suppliers.
    2. A BCP requires workarounds for IT failures. But it’s difficult to plan workarounds without a clear understanding of the potential IT downtime and data loss. Your DRP will answer those questions, and without a DRP, BCP discussions can get bogged down in IT discussions. Think of payroll as an example: if downtime might be 24 hours, the business might simply wait for recovery; if downtime might be a week, waiting it out is not an option.
    3. As an IT manager, you can develop an IT DRP primarily with resources within your control. That makes it an easier starting point and puts IT in a better position to shift responsibility for BCP to business leaders (where it should reside) since essentially the IT portion is done.

    Create a Right-Sized Disaster Recovery Plan today.

    Modernize the BCP

    If your BCP relies heavily on paper-based processes as workarounds, it’s time to update your plan.

    Back when transactions were recorded on paper and then keyed into the mainframe system later, it was easier to revert to deskside processes. There is very little in the way of paper-based processes anymore, and as a result, it is increasingly difficult to resume business processes without IT.

    Think about your own organization. What IT system(s) are absolutely critical to business operations? While you might be able to continue doing business without IT, this requires regular preparation and training. It’s likely a completely offline process and won’t be a viable workaround for long even if staff know how to do the work. If your data center and core systems are down, technology-enabled workarounds (such as collaboration via mobile technologies or cloud-based solutions) could help you weather the outage, and may be more flexible and adaptable for day-to-day work.

    The bottom line:

    Technology is a critical dependency for business processes. Consider the role IT systems play as process dependencies and as workarounds as part of continuity planning.

    Info-Tech’s approach

    The traditional approach to BCP takes too long and produces a plan that is difficult to use and maintain.

    The Problem: You need to create a BCP, but don’t know where to start.

    • BCP is being demanded more and more to comply with regulations, mitigate business risk, meet customer demands, and obtain insurance.
    • IT leaders are often asked to lead BCP.

    The Complication: A traditional BCP process takes longer to show value.

    • Traditional consultants don’t usually have an incentive to accelerate the process.
    • At the same time, self-directed projects with no defined process go months without producing useful deliverables.
    • The result is a dense manual that checks boxes but isn’t maintainable or usable in a crisis.

    A pie chart is separated into three segments, Internal Mandates 43%, Customer Demands 23%, and Regulatory Requirements 34%. The bottom of the image reads Source: Info-Tech Research Group.

    The Info-Tech difference:

    Use Info-Tech’s methodology to right-size and streamline the process.

    • Reduce required effort. Keep the work manageable and maintain momentum by focusing on one business unit at a time; allow that unit to own their BCP.
    • Prioritize your effort. Evaluate the current state of your BCP to identify the steps that are most in need of attention.
    • Get valuable results faster. Functional deliverables and insights from the first business unit’s BCP can be leveraged by the entire organization (e.g. communication, assessment, and BC site strategies).

    Expedite BCP development

    Info-Tech’s Approach to BCP:

    • Start with one critical business unit to manage scope, establish a repeatable process, and generate deliverables that become a template for remaining business units.
    • Resolve critical gaps as you identify them, generating early value and risk mitigation.
    • Create concise, practical documentation to support recovery.

    Embed training and awareness throughout the planning process.

    BCP for Business Unit A:

    Scope → Pilot BIA → Response Plan → Gap Analysis

    → Lessons Learned:

    • Leverage early results to establish a BCM framework.
    • Take action to resolve critical gaps as they are identified.
    • BCP for Business Units B through N.
    • Scope→BIA→Response Plan→Gap Analysis

    = Ongoing governance, testing, maintenance, improvement, awareness, and training.

    By comparison, a traditional BCP approach takes much longer to mitigate risk:

    • An extensive, upfront commitment of time and resources before defining incident response plans and mitigating risk.
    • A “big bang” approach that makes it difficult to predict the required resourcing and timelines for the project.

    Organizational Risk Assessment and Business Impact Analysis → Solution Design to Achieve Recovery Objectives → Create and Validate Response Plans

    Case Study

    Continuity Planning Supports COVID-19 Response

    Industry: Non-Profit
    Source: Info-Tech Advisory Services

    A charitable foundation for a major state university engaged Info-Tech to support the creation of their business continuity plan.

    With support from Info-Tech analysts and the tools in this blueprint, they worked with their business unit stakeholders to identify recovery objectives, confirm recovery capabilities and business process workarounds, and address gaps in their continuity plans.

    Results

    The outcome wasn’t a pandemic plan – it was a continuity plan that was applicable to pandemics. And it worked. Business processes were prioritized, gaps in work-from-home and business process workarounds had been identified and addressed, business leaders owned their plan and understood their role in it, and IT had clear requirements that they were able and ready to support.

    “The work you did here with us was beyond valuable! I wish I could actually explain how ready we really were for this…while not necessarily for a pandemic, we were ready to spring into action, set things up, the priorities were established, and most importantly some of the changes we’ve made over the past few years helped beyond words! The fact that the groups had talked about this previously almost made what we had to do easy.“ -- VP IT Infrastructure

    Download the BCP Case Study

    Project Overview: BCP

    Phases Phase 1: Identify BCP Maturity and Document Process Dependencies Phase 2: Conduct a BIA to Determine Acceptable RTOs and RPOs Phase 3: Document the Recovery Workflow and Projects to Close Gaps Phase 4: Extend the Results of the Pilot BCP and Implement Governance
    Steps 1.1 Assess current BCP maturity 2.1 Define an objective impact scoring scale 3.1 Determine current recovery procedures 4.1 Consolidate BCP pilot insights to support an overall BCP project plan
    1.2 Establish the pilot BCP team 2.2 Estimate the impact of downtime 3.2 Identify and prioritize projects to close gaps 4.2 Outline a business continuity management (BCM) program
    1.3 Identify business processes, dependencies, and alternatives 2.3 Determine acceptable RTO/RPO targets 3.3 Evaluate BC site and command center options 4.3 Test and maintain your BCP
    Tools and Templates

    BCP Business Impact Analysis Tool

    Results Presentation

    BCP Maturity Scorecard

    Tabletop Planning Template

    BCP Summary

    Pilot Project Charter

    Recovery Workflow Examples

    Business Continuity Teams and Roles

    Business Process Workflows Examples

    BCP Project Roadmap

    Blueprint deliverables

    Each step of this blueprint is accompanied by supporting deliverables to help you accomplish your goals:

    BCP Business Impact Analysis Tool: Conduct and document a business impact analysis using this document.

    BCP Recovery Workflows Example: Model your own recovery workflows on this example.

    BCP Project Roadmap: Use this tool to prioritize projects that can improve BCP capabilities and mitigate gaps and risks.

    BCP Relocation Checklists: Plan for and manage a site relocation – whether to an alternate site or work from home.

    Key deliverable:

    BCP Summary Document

    Summarize your organization's continuity capabilities and objectives in a 15-page, easy-to-consume template.

    This document consolidates data from the supporting documentation and tools to the right.

    Download Info-Tech’s BCP Summary Document

    Insight summary

    Focus less on risk, and more on recovery

    Avoid focusing on risk and probability analysis to drive your continuity strategy. You never know what might disrupt your business, so develop a flexible plan to enable business resumption regardless of the event.

    Small teams = good pilots

    Choose a small team for your BCP pilot. Small teams are better at trialing new techniques and finding new ways to think about problems.

    Calculate downtime impact

    Develop and apply a scoring scale to develop a more-objective assessment of downtime impact for the organization. This will help you prioritize recovery.

    It’s not no, but rather not now…

    You can’t address all the organization’s continuity challenges at once. Prioritize high value, low effort initiatives and create a long-term roadmap for the rest.

    Show Value Now

    Get to value quickly. Start with one business unit with continuity challenges, and a small, focused project team who can rapidly learn the methodology, identify continuity gaps, and define solutions that can also be leveraged by other departments right away.

    Lightweight Testing Exercises

    Outline recovery capabilities using lightweight, low risk tabletop planning exercises. Our research shows tabletop exercises increase confidence in recovery capabilities almost as much as live exercises, which carry much higher costs and risks.

    Blueprint benefits

    Demonstrate compliance with demands from regulators and customers

    • Develop a plan that satisfies auditors, customers, and insurance providers who demand proof of a continuity plan.
    • Demonstrate commitment to resilience by identifying gaps in current capabilities and projects to overcome those gaps.
    • Empower business users to develop their plans and perform regular maintenance to ensure plans don’t go stale.
    • Establish a culture of business readiness and resilience.

    Leverage your BCP to drive value (Business Benefits)

    • Enable flexible, mobile, and adaptable business operations that can overcome disruptions large and small. This includes making it easier to work remotely in response to pandemics or facility disruptions.
    • Clarify the risk of the status quo to business leaders so they can make informed decisions on where to invest in business continuity.
    • Demonstrate to customers your ability to overcome disruptions and continue to deliver your services.

    Info-Tech Advisory Services lead to Measurable Value

    Info-Tech members told us they save an average of $44,522 and 23 days by working with an Info-Tech analyst on BCP (source: client response data from Info-Tech's Measured Value Survey).

    Why do members report value from analyst engagement?

    1. Expert advice on your specific situation to overcome obstacles and speed bumps.
    2. Structure the project and stay on track.
    3. Review project deliverables and ensure the process is applied properly.

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    "Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful."

    Guided Implementation

    “Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track.”

    Workshop

    “We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place.”

    Consulting

    “Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project.”

    Diagnostic and consistent frameworks are used throughout all four options.

    Guided Implementation

    Your Trusted Advisor is a call away.

    A Guided Implementation (GI) is series of calls with an Info-Tech analyst to help implement our best practices in your organization.

    A typical GI is between eight to twelve calls over the course of four to six months.

    Scoping

    Call 1: Scope requirements, objectives, and stakeholders. Identify a pilot BCP project.

    Business Processes and Dependencies

    Calls 2 - 4: Assess current BCP maturity. Create business process workflows, dependencies, alternates, and workarounds.

    Conduct a BIA

    Calls 5 – 7: Create an impact scoring scale and conduct a BIA. Identify acceptable RTO and RPO.

    Recovery Workflow

    Calls 8 – 9: Create a recovery workflow based on tabletop planning.

    Documentation & BCP Framework

    Call 10: Summarize the pilot results and plan next steps. Define roles and responsibilities. Make the case for a wider BCP program.

    Workshop Overview

    Contact your account representative for more information.

    workshops@infotech.com | 1-888-670-8889

    Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5
    Identify BCP Maturity, Key Processes, and Dependencies Conduct a BIA to Determine Acceptable RTOs and RPOs Document the Current Recovery Workflow and Projects to Close Gaps Identify Remaining BCP Documentation and Next Steps Next Steps and Wrap-Up (offsite)
    Activities

    1.1 Assess current BCP maturity.

    1.2 Identify key business processes to include in scope.

    1.3 Create a flowchart for key business processes to identify business processes, dependencies, and alternatives.

    2.1 Define an objective scoring scale to indicate different levels of impact.

    2.2 Estimate the impact of a business disruption on cost, goodwill, compliance, and health & safety.

    2.3 Determine acceptable RTOs/RPOs for selected business processes based on business impact.

    3.1 Review tabletop planning – what is it, how is it done?

    3.2 Walk through a business disruption scenario to determine your current recovery timeline, RTO/RPO gaps, and risks to your ability to resume business operations.

    3.3 Identify and prioritize projects to close RTO/RPO gaps and mitigate recovery risks.

    4.1 Assign business continuity management (BCM) roles to govern BCP development and maintenance, as well as roles required to execute recovery.

    4.2 Identify remaining documentation required for the pilot business unit and how to leverage the results to repeat the methodology for remaining business units.

    4.3 Workshop review and wrap-up.

    5.1 Finalize deliverables for the workshop.

    5.2 Set up review time for workshop outputs and to discuss next steps.

    Deliverables
    1. Baseline BCP maturity status
    2. Business process flowcharts
    3. Business process dependencies and alternatives recorded in the BIA tool
    1. Potential impact of a business disruption quantified for selected business processes.
    2. Business processes criticality and recovery priority defined
    3. Acceptable RTOs/RPOs defined based on business impact
    1. Current-state recovery workflow and timeline.
    2. RTO/RPO gaps identified.
    3. BCP project roadmap to close gaps
    1. BCM roles and responsibilities defined
    2. Workshop results deck; use this to communicate pilot results and next steps
    1. Finalized deliverables

    Phase 1

    Identify BCP Maturity and Document Process Dependencies

    Phase 1

    1.1 Assess Current BCP Maturity

    1.2 Establish the pilot BCP team

    1.3 Identify business processes, dependencies, and alternatives

    Insights & Outcomes

    Define the scope for the BCP project: assess the current state of the plan, create a pilot project team and pilot project charter, and map the business processes that will be the focus of the pilot.

    Participants

    • BCP Coordinator
    • BCP Executive Sponsor
    • Pilot Business Unit Manager & Process SMEs

    Step 1.1

    Assess current BCP Maturity

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Complete Info-Tech’s BCP Maturity Scorecard

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Executive Sponsor
    • BCP Coordinator

    You'll use the following tools & templates:

    Outcomes & Insights

    Establish current BCP maturity using Info-Tech’s ISO 22301-aligned BCP Maturity Scorecard.

    Evaluate the current state of your continuity plan

    Use Info-Tech’s Maturity Scorecard to structure and accelerate a BCP maturity assessment.

    Conduct a maturity assessment to:

    • Create a baseline metric so you can measure progress over time. This metric can also drive buy-in from senior management to invest time and effort into your BCP.
    • Understand the scope of work to create a complete business continuity plan.
    • Measure your progress and remaining gaps by updating your assessment once you’ve completed the activities in this blueprint.

    This blueprint primarily addresses the first four sections in the scorecard, which align with the creation of the core components of your business continuity plan.

    Info-Tech’s BCP Maturity Scorecard

    Info-Tech’s maturity scorecard is aligned with ISO 22301, the international standard that describes the key elements of a functioning business continuity management system or program – the overarching set of documents, practices, and controls that support the ongoing creation and maintenance of your BCP. A fully functional BCMS goes beyond business continuity planning to include crisis management, BCP testing, and documentation management.

    Audit tools tend to treat every bullet point in ISO 22301 as a separate requirement – which means there’s almost 400 lines to assess. Info-Tech’s BCP Maturity Scorecard has synthesized key requirements, minimizing repetition to create a high-level self-assessment aligned with the standard.

    A high score is a good indicator of likely success with an audit.

    Download Info-Tech's BCP Maturity Scorecard

    Tool: BCP Maturity Scorecard

    Assess your organization’s BCP capabilities.

    Use Info-Tech’s BCP Maturity Scorecard to:

    • Assess the overall completeness of your existing BCP.
    • Track and demonstrate progress towards completion as you work through successive planning iterations with additional business units.
    1. Download a copy of the BCP Maturity Scorecard. On tab 1, indicate the percent completeness for each item using a 0-10 scale (0 = 0% complete, 10 = 100% complete).
    2. If you anticipate improvements in a certain area, make note of it in the “Comments” column.
    3. Review a visual representation of your overall scores on tab 2.

    Download Info-Tech's BCP Maturity Scorecard

    "The fact that this aligns with ISO is huge." - Dr. Bernard Jones MBCI, CBCP

    Step 1.2

    Establish the pilot BCP team

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Assign accountability, responsibility, and roles.
    • Develop a project charter.
    • Identify dependencies and alternates for those dependencies.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Executive Sponsor
    • BCP Coordinator

    In this step, you’ll use these tools and templates:

    Outcomes & Insights

    Assign roles and responsibilities for the BCP pilot project. Set milestones and timelines for the pilot.

    Take a pilot approach for BCP

    Limit the scope of an initial BCP project to get to value faster.

    Pilot Project Goals

    • Establish a repeatable methodology that fits your organization and will accelerate BCP development, with tangible deliverables that provide a template for the rest of the business.
    • Identify high-priority business continuity gaps for the pilot business unit, many of which will also apply to the overall organization.
    • Identify initiatives to start addressing gaps now.
    • Enable business users to learn the BCP methodology and toolset so they can own and maintain their business unit BCPs.

    Accomplishments expected:

    • Define key business processes and process dependencies, and alternatives if dependencies are not available.
    • Classify key business processes by criticality for one business unit, using an objective impact scoring scale.
    • Set recovery objectives for these key processes.
    • Document workarounds and recovery plans.
    • Identify gaps in recovery plans and list action items to mitigate risks.
    • Develop a project plan to structure a larger continuity project.

    What not to expect from a pilot project:

    • A complete organizational BCP (the pilot is a strong starting point).
    • Implemented solutions to all BCP gaps (proposed solutions will need to be evaluated first).

    Structure IT’s role in continuity planning

    Clearly define IT’s role in the pilot BCP project to deliver a successful result that enables business units to own BCP in the future.

    Though IT is a critical dependency for most processes, IT shouldn’t own the business continuity plan. IT should be an internal BCP process consultant, and each business unit must own their plan.

    IT should be an internal BCP consultant.

    • IT departments interact with all business units, which gives IT leaders at least a high-level understanding of business operations across the organization.
    • IT leaders typically also have at least some knowledge of disaster recovery, which provides a foundation for tackling BCP.
    • By contrast, business leaders often have little or no experience with disaster recovery, and don’t have the same level of experience as IT when it comes to working with other business units.

    Why shouldn’t IT own the plan?

    • Business unit managers have the authority to direct resources in their department to participate in the BCP process.
    • Business users are the experts in their processes, and are in the best position to identify dependencies, downtime impacts, recovery objectives, and viable solutions (e.g., acceptable alternate sites or process workarounds).
    • Ultimately, business unit managers and executives must decide whether to mitigate, accept, or transfer risks.

    Info-Tech Insight

    A goal of the pilot is to seed success for further planning exercises. This is as much about demonstrating the value of continuity planning to the business unit, and enabling them to own it, as it is about implementing the methodology successfully.

    Create a RACI matrix for the pilot

    Assemble a small, focused team for the pilot project empowered to discover, report, and present possible solutions to continuity planning challenges in your organization.

    Outline roles and responsibilities on the pilot team using a “RACI” exercise. Remember, only one party can be ultimately accountable for the work being completed.

    Example Pilot BCP Project RACI

    Board Executive Team BCP Executive Sponsor BCP Team Leader BCP Coordinator Pilot Bus. Unit Manager Expert Bus. Unit Staff IT Manager
    Communicate BCP project status I I I A R C C I
    Assign resources to pilot BCP project A R C R C R
    Conduct continuity planning activities I A/R R R R R
    Create pilot BCP deliverables I A R R C C C
    Manage BCP documentation I A C R I C C
    Integrate results into BCMS I I A R R I C C
    Create overall BCP project plan I I A R C C

    R: Responsible for doing the work.

    A: Accountable to ensure the activity/work happens.

    C: Consulted prior to decision or action.

    I: Informed of the decision/action once it’s made.

    "Large teams excel at solving problems, but it is small teams that are more likely to come up with new problems for their more sizable counterparts to solve." – Wang & Evans, 2019

    Info-Tech Insight

    Small teams tend to be better at trialing new techniques and finding new ways to think about problems, both of which are needed for a BCP pilot project.

    Choose one business unit for the pilot

    Many organizations begin their BCP project with a target business unit in mind. It’s still worth establishing whether this business unit meets the criteria below.

    Good candidates for a pilot project:

    • Business processes are standardized and documented.
    • Management and staff are motivated to improve business continuity.
    • The business unit is sufficiently well resourced to spare time (e.g. a few hours a week) to dedicate to the BCP process.
    • If the business unit doesn’t meet these criteria, consider addressing shortfalls before the pilot (e.g. via stakeholder management or business process analysis) or selecting another unit.
    • Many of the decisions will ultimately require input and support from the business unit’s manager(s). It is critical that they are bought into and engaged with the project.
    • The leader of the first business unit will be a champion for BCP within the executive team.
    • Sometimes, there’s no clear place to start. If this is the case for you, consider using Info-Tech’s Business Unit BCP Prioritization Tool to determine the order in which business units should undergo BCP development.

    Create role descriptions for the pilot project

    Use these role descriptions and your RACI chart to define roles for the pilot.

    These short descriptions establish the functions, expectations, and responsibilities of each role at a more granular level.

    The Board and executives have an outsized influence on the speed at which the project can be completed. Ensure that communication with these stakeholders is clear and concise. Avoid involving them directly in activities and deliverable creation, unless it’s required by their role (e.g. as a business unit manager).

    Project Role Description
    Board & Executive Team
    • Will receive project status updates but are not directly involved in deliverable creation.
    Executive Sponsor
    • Liaison with the executive team.
    • Accountable to ensure the pilot BCP is completed.
    • Set project goals and approve resource allocation and funding.
    Pilot Business Unit Manager
    • Drive the project and assign required resources.
    • Delegate day-to-day project management tasks to the BCP Coordinator.
    BCP Coordinator
    • Function as the project manager. This includes scheduling activities, coordinating resources, reporting progress, and managing deliverables.
    • Learn and apply the BCP methodology to achieve project goals.
    Expert Business Unit Staff
    • Pilot business unit process experts to assist with BCP development for that business unit.
    IT Manager
    • Provide guidance on IT capabilities and recovery options.
    Other Business Unit Managers
    • Consulted to validate or provide input to the business impact analysis and RTOs/RPOs.

    Identify a suitable BCP Coordinator

    A skilled and committed coordinator is critical to building an effective and durable BCP.

    • Coordinating the BC planning effort requires a perspective that’s informed by IT, but goes beyond IT.
    • For example, many IT professionals only see business processes where they intersect with IT. The BCP Coordinator needs to be able to ask the right questions to help the business units think through dependencies for critical processes.
    • Business analysts can thrive in this role, which requires someone effective at dissecting business processes, working with business users, identifying requirements, and managing large projects.

    Structure the role of the BCP Coordinator

    The BCP Coordinator works with the pilot business unit as well as remaining business units to provide continuity and resolve discrepancies as they come up between business units.

    Specifically, this role includes:

    • Project management tasks (e.g. scheduling, assigning tasks, coordinating resources, and reporting progress).
    • Learning the BCP methodology (through the pilot) so that this person can lead remaining business units through their BCP process. This enables the IT leader who had been assigned to guide BCP development to step back into a more appropriate consulting role.
    • Managing the BCP workflow.

    "We found it necessary to have the same person work with each business unit to pass along lessons learned and resolve contingency planning conflicts for common dependencies." – Michelle Swessel, PM and IT Bus. Analyst, Wisconsin Compensation Rating Bureau (WCRB)

    Template: Pilot Project Charter

    Formalize participants, roles, milestones, risks for the pilot project.

    Your charter should:

    1. Define project parameters, including drivers, objectives, deliverables, and scope.
    2. Identify the pilot business unit.
    3. Assign a BCP pilot team, including a BCP Coordinator, to execute the methodology.
    4. Define before-and-after metrics to enable the team to measure pilot success.
    5. Set achievable, realistic target dates for specific project milestones.
    6. Document risks, assumptions, and constraints.

    Download Info-Tech’s BCP Pilot Project Charter Template

    Step 1.3

    Identify business processes, dependencies, and alternatives

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Identify key business processes.
    • Document the process workflow.
    • Identify dependencies and alternates for those dependencies.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • BCP Coordinator
    • Pilot Business Unit Manager
    • Expert Business Unit Staff

    You'll use the following tools & templates:

    Outcomes & Insights

    Documented workflows, process dependencies, and workarounds when dependencies are unavailable.

    Flowchart business processes

    Workflows help you visually identify process dependencies and optimization opportunities.

    • Business continuity planning is business process focused. You need to document business processes, dependencies, and downtime workarounds.
    • Process documentation is a basic BCP audit requirement, but it will also:
      • Keep discussions about business processes well-scoped and focused – by documenting the process, you also clarify for everyone what you’re actually talking about.
      • Remind participants of process dependencies and workarounds.
      • Make it easier to spot possible process breakdowns or improvements.
      • Capture your work, which can be used to create or update SOP documentation.
    • Use flowcharts to capture process workflows. Flowcharts are often quicker to create, take less time to update, and are ultimately more usable than a dense manual.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Process review often results in discovering informal processes, previously unknown workarounds or breakdowns, shadow IT, or process improvement opportunities.

    1.3.1 Prioritize pilot business unit processes

    Input

    • List of key business unit processes.

    Output

    • List of key business unit processes, now prioritized (at a high-level)

    Materials

    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • BCP Business Impact Analysis Tool

    Participants

    • BCP Coordinator (leads the discussion)
    • Pilot Business Unit Manager

    30 minutes

    1. Create a list of all formal and informal business processes executed by the pilot business unit.
    2. Discuss the impact of process downtime, and do a quick assessment whether impact of downtime for each process would be high, medium, or low across each of these criteria:
      • Revenue or costs (e.g. supports sales, billing, or productivity)
      • Goodwill (e.g. affects internal or external reputation)
      • Compliance (e.g. affects legal or industry requirements)
      • Health or safety (e.g. affects employee/public health & safety)

    Note: A more in-depth analysis will be conducted later to refine priorities. The goal here is a high-level order of priority for the next steps in the planning methodology (identify business processes and dependencies).

    1. In the BCP Business Impact Analysis Tool, Processes and Dependencies tab, record the following:
      • The business processes in rough order of criticality.
      • For each process, provide a brief description that focuses on purpose and impact.
      • For each process, name a process owner (i.e. accountable for process completion – could be a manager or senior staff, not necessarily those executing the process).

    1.3.2 Review process flows & identify dependencies

    Input

    • List of key business unit processes (prioritized at a high level in Activity 1.3.1).
    • Business process flowcharts.

    Output

    • Business process flowcharts

    Materials

    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • Microsoft Visio, or other flowcharting software
    • BCP Business Impact Analysis Tool

    Download Info-Tech’s Business Process Workflows Example

    1.5 hours

    1. Use a whiteboard to flowchart process steps. Collaborate to clarify process steps and dependencies. If processes are not documented, use this as an opportunity to create standard operating procedures (SOPs) to drive consistency and process optimization, as described in the Info-Tech blueprint, Create Visual SOP Documents that Drive Process Optimization, Not Just Peace of Mind.
    2. Record the dependencies in tab 1 of the BCP Business Impact Analysis Tool in the appropriate columns:
      • People – Anyone involved in the process, from providing guidance to executing the steps.
      • IT Applications – Core IT services (e.g. ERP, CRM) required for this process.
      • End-user devices & equipment – End-user devices, locally-installed apps, IoT, etc.
      • Facility – Any special requirements beyond general office space.
      • Suppliers & Service Providers – Third-parties who support this process.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Policies and procedures manuals, if they exist, are often out of date or incomplete. Use these as a starting point, but don’t stop there. Identify the go-to staff members who are well versed in how a process works.

    1.3.3 Document workarounds

    Input

    • Business process flowcharts.
    • List of process dependencies.

    Output

    • Workarounds and alternatives in the event dependencies aren’t available.

    Materials

    • BCP Business Impact Analysis Tool

    Participants

    • BCP Coordinator (facilitates the activity)
    • Pilot Business Unit Manager
    • Business Process Subject Matter Experts (SMEs)

    1.5 hours

    Identify alternatives to critical dependencies to help you create contingency plans.

    1. For each business process, identify known alternatives for each primary dependency. Ignore for the moment how long the workaround or alternate would be feasible.
    2. Record alternatives in the Business Continuity Business Impact Analysis Tool, Processes and Dependencies tab, Alternatives columns (a separate column for each category of dependency):
      • People – Can other staff execute the process steps? (Example: managers can step in if needed.)
      • IT Applications – Is there a manual workaround or other alternative while enterprise technology services are unavailable? (Example: database is down, but data is stored on physical forms.)
      • End-User Devices and Equipment – What alternatives exist to the usual end-user technologies, such as workstations and desk phones? (Example: some staff have cell phones.)
      • Facility Location and Requirements – Is there an alternate location where this work can be conducted? (Example: work from home, or from another building on the campus.)
      • Suppliers and External Services – Is there an alternative source for key suppliers or other external inputs? (Example: find alternate suppliers for key inputs.)
      • Additional Inputs or Requirements – What workarounds exist for additional artifacts that enable process steps (e.g. physical inventory records, control lists)? (Example: if hourly pay information is missing, run the same payroll as the previous run and reconcile once that information is available.)

    Phase 2

    Conduct a BIA to Determine Acceptable RTOs and RPOs

    Phase 2

    2.1 Define an objective impact scoring scale

    2.2 Estimate the impact of downtime

    2.3 Determine acceptable RTO/RPO targets

    Insights & Outcomes

    Assess the impact of business process downtime using objective, customized impact scoring scales. Sort business processes by criticality and by assigning criticality tiers, recovery time, and recovery point objectives.

    Participants

    • BCP Coordinator
    • Pilot Business Unit Manager
    • Business Process SMEs

    Step 2.1

    Define an objective scoring scale

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Identify impact criteria that are relevant to your business.
    • Create a scale that defines a range of impact for relevant criteria.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • BCP Coordinator
    • Pilot Business Unit Manager
    • Expert Business Unit Staff

    In this step, you’ll use these tools and templates:

    Outcomes & Insights

    Define an impact scoring scale relevant to your business, which allows you to more-objectively assess the impact of business process downtime.

    Set appropriate recovery objectives

    Recovery time and recovery point objectives should align with business impact.

    The activities in Phase 2 will help you set appropriate, acceptable recovery objectives based on the business impact of process downtime.

    • The recovery time objective (RTO) and recovery point objective (RPO) are the recovery goals set for individual processes and dependencies to ensure your business unit meets its overall acceptable recovery timeline.

    For example:

    • An RTO of four hours means staff and other required resources must be available to support the business processes within four hours of an incident (e.g. relocate to an alternate worksite if necessary, access needed equipment, log-in to needed systems, get support for completing the process from alternate staff, etc.)
    • An RPO of four hours for a customer database means the most recent secondary copy of the data must never be more than four hours old – e.g. running a backup every four hours or less.

    Conduct a Business Impact Analysis (BIA)

    Create Impact Scoring Scales→Assess the impact of process downtime→Review overall impact of process downtime→Set Criticality Tiers→Set Recovery Time and Recovery Point Objectives

    Create financial impact scales

    Identify maximum cost and revenue impacts to build financial impact scales to measure the financial impact of process downtime.

    Work with the Business Unit Manager and Executive Sponsor to identify the maximum impact in each category to the entire business. Use a worst-case scenario to estimate the maximum for each scale. In the future, you can use this scoring scale to estimate the impact of downtime for other business units.

    • Loss of Revenue: Estimate the upper bound for this figure from the previous year, and divide that by the number of business days in the year. Note: Some organizations may choose to exclude revenue as a category where it won’t be lost (e.g. public-sector organizations).
    • Loss of Productivity: Proxy for lost workforce productivity using payroll numbers. Use the fully loaded payroll for the company, divided by the number of working days in the year as the maximum.
    • Increased Operating Costs: Isolate this to known additional costs resulting from a disruption. Does the interruption itself increase operating costs (e.g. if using timesheets for hourly/contract employees and that information is lost or unavailable, do you assume a full work week)?
    • Financial Penalties: If there are known financial penalties (e.g. due to failure to meet SLAs or other contractual obligations), include those values in your cost estimates.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Cost estimates are like hand grenades and horseshoes: you don’t need to be exact. It’s much easier to get input and validation from other stakeholders when you have estimates. Even weak estimates are far better than a blank sheet.

    Create goodwill, compliance, and safety impact scales

    Create a quantitative, more-objective scoring scale for goodwill, compliance and safety by following the guidance below.

    • Impact on Customers: By default, the customer impact scale is based on the percent of your total customer base impacted. You can also modify this scale to include severity of impact or alter it to identify the maximum number of customers that would be impacted.
    • Impact on Staff: Consider staff that are directly employed by the organization or its subsidiaries.
    • Impact on Business Partners: Which business partners would be affected by a business disruption?
    • Impact on Health & Safety: Consider the extent to which process downtime could increase the risk of the health & safety of staff, customers, and the general public. In addition, degradation of health & safety services should be noted.
    • Impact on Compliance: Set up the scale so that you can capture the impact of any critical regulatory requirements that might not be met if a particular process was down for 24 hours. Consider whether you expect to receive leeway or a grace period from the governance body that requires evidence of compliance.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Use just the impact scales that are relevant to your organization.

    Tool: Impact Scoring Scales

    • Define 4-point scoring scales in the BCP business impact analysis tool for a more objective assessment than gut-feel rankings.
    • You don’t need to include every category, if they aren’t relevant to your organization.
    • Refine the scoring scale as needed through the pilot project.
    • Use the same scoring scale for impact analyses with additional business units in the future.

    An image depicting the Business Impact Analysis Tool. A note pointing to the Level of Impact and Direct Cost Impact Scales columns states: Add the maximum cost impacts across each of the four impact scales to the tool. The rest of the scale will auto-populate based on the criteria outlined in the “Level of Impact” column. A note pointing to the column headers states: Change the names of the column headers in this tab. The changes to column headers will populate across the rest of the tool. Indicate exclusions from the scale here. A note pointing to the Goodwill Impact Scales columns reads: Update the Goodwill impact scales. For example, perhaps a critical impact on customers could be defined as “a significant impact on all customers using the organization’s services in a 24-hour period.” A note pointing to the Compliance, Heath and Safety Impact Scales columns reads: Review the compliance and safety impact scales, and update as required.

    Step 2.2

    Estimate the impact of downtime

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Apply the scoring scale developed in step 2.1 to assess the impact of downtime for specific business processes.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • BCP Coordinator
    • Pilot Business Unit Manager
    • Expert Business Unit Staff

    In this step, you’ll use these tools and templates:

    Outcomes & Insights

    Develop an objective view of the impact of downtime for key business processes.

    2.2.1 Estimate the impact of downtime

    1.5 hours

    Input

    • List of business processes, dependencies, and workarounds, all documented in the BIA tool.

    Output

    • Impact of downtime scores for key business unit processes.

    Materials

    • BCP Business Impact Analysis Tool

    Participants

    • BCP Coordinator (facilitates the discussion)
    • Business Process Subject Matter Experts (SMEs)
    • Pilot Business Unit Manager
    1. Print a copy of the Scoring Criteria tab to use as a reference, or have it open on another screen. In tab 3 of the BCP Business Impact Analysis Tool use the drop-down menu to assign a score of 0 to 4 based on levels of impact defined in the Scoring Criteria tab.
    2. Work horizontally across all categories for a single process. This will set a benchmark, familiarize you with the scoring system, and allow you to modify any scoring scales if needed. In general, begin with the process that you know to be most critical.
      • For example, if call center sales operations are down:
        • Loss of Revenue would be the portion of sales revenue generated through the call center. This might score a 2 or 3 depending on the proportion of sales generated through the call center.
        • The Impact on Customers might be a 1 or 2 depending on the extent that existing customers might be using the call center to purchase new products or services.
        • The Legal/Regulatory Compliance and Health or Safety Risk might be a 0.
    3. Next, work vertically across all processes within a single category. This will allow you to compare scores within the category as you create them.

    Tool: Impact Analysis

    • The goal of the exercise is to arrive at a defensible ranking of process criticality, based on the impact of downtime.
    • Make sure participants can see the scores you’re assigning during the exercise (e.g. by writing out the scores on a whiteboard, or displaying the tool on a projector or screen) and can reference the scoring scales tab to understand what the scores mean.
    • Take notes to record the rationale behind the impact scores. Consider assigning note-taking duties to one of the participants.

    An image of the Impact Analysis Tool. A note pointing to the column headings states: Any customized column headings from tab 2, Scoring Criteria are automatically ported to this tab. A note pointing to the Impact on Goodwill columns reads: Score each application across each scoring scale from 0 to 4. Be sure to refer back to the scoring scale defined in tab 2. Have the scoring scale printed out, written on a whiteboard, or displayed on a separate screen. A note pointing to the tool's dropdown boxes states: Score categories using the drop-down boxes. A note pointing to the centre columns reads: Ignore scoring for categories you choose to exclude. You can hide these columns to clean up the tool if needed.

    2.2.2 Sort processes into Criticality Tiers

    30 minutes

    Input

    • Processes, with assigned impact scores (financial impact, goodwill impact, compliance and safety impact).

    Output

    • Business processes sorted into criticality tiers, based on the impact of downtime.

    Materials

    • BCP Business Impact Analysis Tool

    Participants

    • BCP Coordinator (facilitates the discussion)
    • Business Process Subject Matter Experts (SMEs)
    • Pilot Business Unit Manager
    1. In general, consider the Total Impact on Goodwill, Compliance, and Safety first.
      • An effective tactic to start the process is to assign a tier 1 rating to all processes with a Goodwill, Compliance, and Safety score that’s 50% or more of the highest total score, tier 2 where scores are between 25% and 50%, and tier 3 where scores are below 25% (see table below for an example).
      • In step 2.3, you’ll align recovery time objectives with the criticality tiers. So, Tier 1 processes will target recovery before Tier 2 processes, and Tier 2 processes will target recovery before Tier 3 processes.
    2. Next, consider the Total Cost of Downtime.
    • The Total Cost is calculated by the tool based on the Scoring Criteria in tab 2 and the estimates in the BIA.
    • Consider whether the total cost impact justifies changing the criticality rating. “Smoke test” categorization with participants. Are there any surprises (processes more or less critical than expected)?
  • If the categorization doesn’t seem right, check that the scoring scale was applied consistently.
  • Example: Highest total Goodwill, Compliance, and Safety impact score is 18.

    Tier Score Range % of high score
    Tier 1 - Gold 9-18 50-100%
    Tier 2 - Silver 5 to 9 25-50%
    Tier 3 - Bronze 0 to 5 0-25%

    Step 2.3

    Determine acceptable RTO and RPO targets

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Identify acceptable Recovery Time Objectives (RTOs) and Recovery Point Objectives (RPOs) for business processes.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • BCP Coordinator
    • Pilot Business Unit Manager
    • Expert Business Unit Staff

    In this step, you’ll use these tools and templates:

    Outcomes and Insights

    Right-size recovery objectives based on business impact.

    Right-size recovery objectives

    Acceptable RTOs and RPOs must be right-sized to the impact of downtime.

    Rapid recovery typically requires more investment.

    The impact of downtime for most business processes tends to look something like the increasing impact curve in the image to the right.

    In the moments after a disruption, impact tends to be minimal. Imagine, for example, that your organization was suddenly unable to pay its suppliers (don’t worry about the reason for the disruption, for the moment). Chances are, this disruption wouldn’t affect many payees if it lasted just a few minutes, or even a few hours. But if the disruption were to continue for days, or weeks, the impact of downtime would start to spiral out of control.

    In general, we want to target recovery somewhere between the point where impact begins, and the point where impact is intolerable. We want to balance the impact of downtime with the investment required to make processes more resilient.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Account for hard copy files as well as electronic data. If that information is lost, is there a backup? BCP can be the driver to remove the last resistance to paperless processes, allowing IT to apply appropriate data protection.

    Set recovery time objectives and recovery point objectives in the “Debate Space”

    A graph with the X axis labelled as: Increasing downtime/data loss and the Y-axis labelled Increasing Impact. The graph shows a line rising as impact and downtime/data loss increase, with the lowest end of the line (on the left) labelled as minimal impact, and the highest point of the line (on the right) labelled maximum tolerance. The middle section of the line is labelled as the Debate Space, and a note reads: Acceptable RTO/RPO must be between Low Impact and Maximum Tolerance

    2.3.1 Define process-level recovery objectives

    1 hour

    Input

    • Processes, ranked by criticality.

    Output

    • Initial business-defined recovery objectives for each process.

    Materials

    • BCP Business Impact Analysis Tool

    Participants

    • BCP Coordinator (facilitates the discussion)
    • Business Process Subject Matter Experts (SMEs)
    • Pilot Business Unit Manager
    1. Review the “Debate Space” diagram (shown in previous section) with all participants.
    2. Ask business participants for each process: how much downtime is tolerable, acceptable, or appropriate? How much data loss is tolerable?
      • If participants aren’t yet comfortable setting recovery objectives, identify the point at which downtime and data loss first becomes noticeable and the point at which downtime and data loss becomes intolerable.
      • Choose an RTO and RPO for each process that falls within the range set by these two extremes.

    RTOs and RPOs are business-defined, impact-aligned objectives that you may not be able to achieve today. It may require significant investments of time and capital to enable the organization to meet RTO and RPO.

    2.3.2 Align RTOs within and across criticality tiers

    1 hour

    Input

    • Results from pilot BCP impact analysis.

    Output

    • Initial business-defined recovery objectives for each process.

    Materials

    • BCP Business Impact Analysis Tool
    • Whiteboard/ flipchart

    Participants

    • BCP Coordinator
    • BCP Project Sponsor
    • Business Process Subject Matter Experts (SMEs)
    • Pilot Business Unit Manager (optional)

    Set a range for RTO for each Tier.

    1. Start with your least critical/Tier 3 processes. Use the filter in the “Criticality Rating” column in the Impact Analysis tab of the BIA tool to show only Tier 3 processes.
      • What range of RTOs did the group assign for processes in this Tier? Does the group agree that these targets are appropriate for these processes?
      • Record the range of RTOs on the whiteboard or flipchart.
    2. Next, look at Tier 2 processes. Use the same filter to show just Tier 2 processes.
      • Record the range of RTOs, confirm the range with the group, and ensure there’s no overlap with the Tier 3 range.
      • If the RTOs in one Tier overlap with RTOs in another, you’ll need to adjust RTOs or move processes between Tiers (if the impact analysis justifies it).
    Tier RTO
    Tier 1 4 hrs- 24 hrs
    Tier 2 24 hrs - 72 hrs
    Tier 3 72 hrs - 120 hrs

    Phase 3

    Document the Recovery Workflow and Projects to Close Gaps

    3.1 Determine current recovery procedures

    3.2 Identify and prioritize projects to close gaps

    3.3 Evaluate business continuity site and command center options

    Insights & Outcomes

    Outline business recovery processes. Highlight gaps and risks that could hinder business recovery. Brainstorm ideas to address gaps and risks. Review alternate site and business relocation options.

    Participants

    • BCP Coordinator
    • Pilot Business Unit Manager
    • Business Process SMEs

    Step 3.1

    Determine current recovery procedures

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Create a step-by-step, high-level recovery workflow.
    • Highlight gaps and risks in the recovery workflow.
    • Test the workflow against multiple scenarios.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • BCP Coordinator
    • Crisis Management Team
    • Pilot Business Unit Manager
    • Expert Business Unit Staff

    In this step, you’ll use these tools and templates:

    Outcomes & Insights

    Establish steps required for business recovery and current recovery timelines.

    Identify risks & gaps that could delay or obstruct an effective recovery.

    Conduct a tabletop planning exercise to draft business recovery plans

    Tabletop exercises are the most effective way to test and increase business confidence in business recovery capabilities.

    Why is tabletop planning so effective?

    • It enables you play out a wider range of scenarios than technology-based testing (e.g. full-scale, parallel) due to cost and complexity factors.
    • It is non-intrusive, so it can be executed more frequently than other testing methodologies.
    • It provides a thorough test of your recovery workflow since the exercise is, essentially, paper-based.
    • After you have a BCP in place, this exercise can continue to be a valuable testing exercise for BCP to capture changes in your recovery process.

    A graph titled: Tabletop planning had the greatest impact on respondent confidence in meeting recovery objectives. The graph shows that the relative importance of Tabletop Planning is 57%, compared to 33% for Unit Testing, 3% for Simulation Testing, 6% for Parallel Testing, and 2% for Full-Scale Testing. The source for the graph is Info-Tech Research Group.

    Step 2 - 2 hours
    Establish command center.

    Step 2: Risks

    • Command center is just 15 miles away from primary site.

    Step 2: Gaps

    • Confirm what’s required to set up the command center.
    • Who has access to the EOC?
    • Does the center have sufficient bandwidth, workstations, phones, telephone lines?

    3.1.1 Choose a scenario for your first tabletop exercise

    30 minutes

    Input

    • List of past incidents.
    • Risks to business continuity that are of high concern.

    Output

    • Scenario for the tabletop exercise.

    Materials

    • N/A

    Participant

    • BCP Coordinator (facilitates the exercise)
    • Business Process Subject Matter Experts (SMEs)
    • Pilot business unit manager

    At the business unit level, the goal is to define a plan to resume business processes after an incident.

    A good scenario is one that helps the group focus on the goal of tabletop planning – to discuss and document the steps required to recover business processes. We suggest choosing a scenario for your first exercise that:

    • Disrupts many process dependencies (i.e. facilities, staff, IT services, suppliers).
    • Does not result in major property damage, harm, or loss of life. Business resumption is the focus of this exercise, not emergency response.
    • Has happened in the past, or is of concern to the business.

    An example: a gas leak at company HQ that requires the area to be cordoned off and power to be shut down. The business must resume processes from another location without access to materials, equipment, or IT services at the primary location.

    A plan that satisfies the gas leak scenario should meet the needs of other scenarios that affect your normal workspace. Then use BCP testing to validate that the plan meets a wider range of incidents.

    3.1.2 Define the BCP activation process

    1 hour

    Input

    • Any existing crisis management, incident response or emergency response plans.
    • BC Scenario.

    Output

    • High level incident notification, assessment, and declaration workflow.

    Materials

    • Cue cards, sticky notes, whiteboard and markers, or Visio template.

    Participants

    • BCP Coordinator
    • Crisis Management Team (if one exists)
    • Business Process SMEs
    • Pilot Business Unit Manager

    Answer the questions below to structure your notification, assessment, and BCP activation procedures.

    Notification

    How will you be notified of a disaster event? How will this be escalated to leadership? How will the team responsible for making decisions coordinate (if they can’t meet on-site)? What emergency response plans are in place to protect health and safety? What additional steps are involved if there’s a risk to health and safety?

    Assessment

    Who’s in charge of the initial assessment? Who may need to be involved in the assessment? Who will coordinate if multiple teams are required to investigate and assess the situation? Who needs to review the results of the assessment, and how will the results of the assessment be communicated (e.g. phone bridge, written memo)? What happens if your primary mode of communication is unavailable (e.g. phone service is down)?

    Declaration

    Who is responsible today for declaring a disaster and activating business continuity plans? What are the organization’s criteria for activating continuity plans, and how will BCP activation be communicated? Establish a crisis management team to guide the organization through a wide range of crises by Implementing Crisis Management Best Practices.

    3.1.3 Document the business recovery workflow

    1 hour

    Input

    • Pilot BIA.
    • Any existing crisis management, incident response, or emergency response plans.
    • BC Scenario

    Output

    • Outline of your BCP declaration and business recovery plan.

    Materials

    • Cue cards, sticky notes, whiteboard and markers, or Visio template.

    Participants

    • BCP Coordinator (facilitates the exercise)
    • Business Process Subject Matter Experts (SMEs)
    • Pilot Business Unit Manager

    Do the following:

    1. Create separate flows for facility, IT, and staff disruptions. Include additional workflows as needed.
      • We suggest you outline the recovery process at least to the point where business processes are restored to a minimum viable functional level.
    2. On white cue cards:
      1. Record the step.
      2. Indicate the task owner.
      3. Estimate how long the step will take.
    3. On yellow cue cards, document gaps in people, process, and technology requirements to complete the step.
    4. On red cue cards, indicate risks (e.g. no backup person for a key staff member).

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Tabletop planning is most effective when you keep it simple.

    • Be focused; stay on task and on time.
    • Revisit each step and record risks and mitigation strategies.
    • Discuss each step from start to finish.
    • Revise the plan with key task owners.
    • Don’t get weighed down by tools.
    • Simple tools, like cue cards or whiteboards, can be very effective.

    Tool: BCP Recovery Workflow

    Document the steps you identified in the tabletop to create your draft recovery workflow.

    Why use a flowchart?

    • Flowcharts provide an at-a-glance view, are ideal for crisis scenarios where pressure is high and effective, and where timely communication is necessary.
    • For experienced managers and staff, a high-level reminder of process flows or key steps is sufficient.
    • Where more detail is required, include links to supporting documentation (which could include checklists, vendor documentation/contracts, other flowcharts, etc.)

    Create one recovery workflow for all scenarios.

    Traditional planning calls for separate plans for different “what-if” scenarios. This is challenging not just because it’s a lot more documentation – and maintenance – but because it’s impossible to predict every possible incident. Use the template, aligned to recovery of process dependencies, to create one recovery workflow for each business unit that can be used in and tested against different scenarios.

    Download Info-Tech’s BCP Recovery Workflow Example

    "We use flowcharts for our declaration procedures. Flowcharts are more effective when you have to explain status and next steps to upper management." – Assistant Director-IT Operations, Healthcare Industry

    "Very few business interruptions are actually major disasters. It’s usually a power outage or hardware failure, so I ensure my plans address ‘minor’ incidents as well as major disasters."- BCP Consultant

    3.1.4 Document achievable recovery metrics (RTA/RPA)

    30 minutes

    Input

    • Pilot BCP BIA.
    • Draft recovery workflow.

    Output

    • RTA and RPA for each business process.

    Materials

    • Pilot BCP BIA.

    Participants

    • BCP Coordinator (facilitates the exercise)
    • Business Process Subject Matter Experts (SMEs)
    • Pilot Business Unit Manager

    Add the following data to your copy of the BCP Business Impact Analysis Tool.

    1. Estimate the recovery time achievable (RTA) for each process based on the required time for the process to be restored to a minimum acceptable functional level. Review your recovery workflow to identify this timeline. For example, if the full process from notification, assessment, and declaration to recovery and relocation would take a full day, set the RTA to 24 hours.
    2. Estimate the recovery point achievable (RPA) for each process based on the maximum amount of data that could be lost. For example, if data on a particular system is backed up offsite once per day, and the onsite system was destroyed just before that backup began, the entire day’s data could be lost and the achievable RPO is 24 hours. Note: Enter a value of 9999 to indicate that data is unrecoverable.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Operating at a minimum acceptable functional level may not be feasible for more than a few days or weeks. Develop plans for immediate continuity first, then develop further plans for long-term continuity processes as required. Recognize that for longer term outages, you will evolve your plans in the crisis to meet the needs of the situation.

    3.1.5 Test the workflow of other scenarios

    1 hour

    Input

    • Draft recovery workflow.

    Output

    • Updated draft recovery workflow.

    Materials

    • Draft recovery workflow.
    • Projector or screen.

    Participants

    • BCP Coordinator (facilitates the exercise)
    • Business Process Subject Matter Experts (SMEs)
    • Pilot Business Unit Manager

    Work from and update the soft copy of your recovery workflow.

    1. Would any steps change if the scenario changes? If yes, capture the different flow with a decision diamond. See the example Recovery Workflow for a workflow that uses decision diamonds. Identify any new gaps or risks you encounter with red and yellow cards.
    2. Make sure the decision diamonds are as generalized as possible. For example, instead of creating a separate response plan for each scenario that would require you to relocate from your existing building, create one response plan for relocation and one response plan for remaining in place.
    3. See the next section for some examples of different types of scenarios that you may include in your recovery workflow.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Remember that health and safety risks must be dealt with first in a crisis. The business unit recovery workflow will focus on restoring business operations after employees are no longer at risk (e.g. the risk has been resolved or employees have been safely relocated). See Implement Crisis Management Best Practices for ideas on how to respond to and assess a wide range of crises.

    Not all scenarios will have full continuity plans

    Risk management is a business decision. Business continuity planning can help decision makers understand and decide on whether to accept or mitigate high impact, low probability risks.

    For some organizations, it’s not practical or possible to invest in the redundancy that would be necessary to recover in a timely manner from certain major events.

    Leverage existing risk management practices to identify key high impact events that could present major business continuity challenges that could cause catastrophic disruptions to facility, IT, staffing, suppliers, or equipment. If you don’t have a risk register, review the scenarios on the next slide and brainstorm risks with the working group.

    Work through tabletop planning to identify how you might work through an event like this, at a high level. In step 3.2, you can estimate the effort, cost, and benefit for different ideas that can help mitigate the damage to the business to help decision makers choose between investment in mitigation or accepting the risk.

    Document any scenarios that you identify as outside the scope of your continuity plans in the “Scope” section of your BCP Summary document.

    For example:

    A single location manufacturing company is creating a BCP.

    The factory is large and contains expensive equipment; it’s not possible to build a second factory for redundancy. If the factory is destroyed, operations can’t be resumed until the factory is rebuilt. In this case, the BCP outlines how to conduct an orderly business shutdown while the factory is rebuilt.

    Contingency planning to resume factory operations after less destructive events, as well as a BCP for corporate services, is still practical and necessary.

    Considerations for other BCP scenarios

    Scenario Type Considerations
    Local hazard (gas leak, chemical leak, criminal incident, etc.)
    • Systems might be accessible remotely, but hands-on maintenance will be required eventually. “Work from home” won’t be a long-term solution.
    • An alternate site is required for service continuity. Can be within normal commuting distance.
    Equipment/building damage (fire, roof collapse, etc.)
    • Equipment will need repair or replacement (vendor involvement).
    • An alternate site is required for service continuity. Can be nearby.
    Regional natural disasters
    • Utilities may be affected (power, running water, etc.).
    • Expect staff to take care of their families first before work.
    • A geographically distant alternate site is required for service continuity.
    Supplier failure (IT provider outage, disaster at supplier, etc.)
    • Service-level agreements are important to establish recovery timelines. Review contracts and master services agreements.
    Staff (lottery win, work stoppage, pandemic/quarantine)
    • Staff are suddenly unavailable. Expect that no warm handoff to alternates is possible and that time to ramp up on the process is accounted for.
    • In a pandemic scenario, work from home, remote toolsets, and digital/contactless workflows become critical.

    Step 3.2

    Identify and prioritize projects to close gaps

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Brainstorm solutions to identified gaps and risks.
    • Prioritize projects and action items to close gaps and risks.
    • Assess the impact of proposed projects on the recovery workflow.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • BCP Coordinator
    • Pilot Business Unit Manager
    • Expert Business Unit Staff

    In this step, you’ll use these tools and templates:

    Outcomes & Insights

    Identify and prioritize projects and action items that can improve business continuity capabilities.

    3.2.1 Brainstorm solutions to address risks and gaps

    1 hour

    Input

    • Draft recovery workflow.
    • Known continuity risks and gaps.

    Output

    • Ideas for action items and projects to improve business continuity.

    Materials

    • Flipchart

    Participants

    • BCP Coordinator (facilitates the exercise)
    • Business Process Subject Matter Experts (SMEs)
    • Pilot Business Unit Manager
    1. Review each of the risk and gap cards from the tabletop exercise.
    2. As a group, brainstorm ideas to address gaps, mitigate risks, and improve resiliency. Write the list of ideas on a whiteboard or flip chart paper. The solutions can range from quick-wins and action items to major capital investments. The following slides can help you seed ideas to support brainstorming and idea generation.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Try to avoid debates about feasibility at this point. The goal is to get ideas on the board.

    When you’re brainstorming solutions to problems, don’t stop with the first idea, even if the solution seems obvious. The first idea isn’t always the best or only solution – other ideas can expand on it and improve it.

    Step 4: No formal process to declare a disaster and invoke business continuity.

    Step 7: Alternate site could be affected by the same regional event as the main office.

    Step 12: Need to confirm supplier service-level agreements (SLAs).

    1. Continue to create BCP documentation.
    2. Identify a third location for regional disasters.
    3. Contact suppliers to confirm SLAs and validate alignment with RTOs/RPOs.
    4. Add BCP requirements collection to service procurement process?

    Discuss your remote work capabilities

    With COVID-19, most organizations have experience with mass work-from-home.

    Review the following case studies. Do they reflect your experience during the COVID-19 pandemic?

    Unacceptable risk

    • A small insurance company provided laptops to staff so they could work remotely.
    • Complication: Cheque and print stock is a dependency and no plan was made to store check stock offsite in a secure fashion.

    Key dependencies missing

    • A local government provided laptops to key staff so they could work remotely.
    • Complication: The organization didn’t currently own enough Citrix licenses for every user to be online concurrently.

    Unable to serve customers

    • The attestation and land services department of a local government agency provided staff with remote access to key apps.
    • Complication: Their most critical business processes were designed to be in-person – they had no plan to execute these processes from home.

    Consider where your own work-from-home plans fell short.

    • Were your collaboration and communication solutions too difficult for users to use effectively?
    • Did legacy infrastructure affect performance or limit capabilities? Were security concerns appropriately addressed?
    • What challenges did IT face supporting business users on break-fix and new requests?
    • Were there logistical needs (shipping/receiving, etc.) that weren’t met?
    • Develop an updated plan to support work-from-home using Info-Tech’s BCP Relocation Checklists and Home Office Survey template, and integrate these into your overall BCP documentation. Stakeholders can easily appreciate the value of this plan since it’s relevant to recent experience.

    Identify opportunities to improve continuity plans

    What gaps in your continuity response could be addressed with better planning?

    People

    • Alternates are not identified
    • Roles in a disaster are not formalized
    • No internal/external crisis comm. strategy

    Site & Facilities

    • No alternate place of business or command center identified
    • No formal planning or exercises to test alternate site viability

    • Identify a viable secondary site and/or work-from-home plan, and develop a schedule for testing activities. Review in Step 3.3 of the Develop a Business Continuity Plan blueprint.

    External Services & Suppliers

    • Contingency plans for a disruption not planned or formalized
    • No formal review of service-level agreements (SLAs)

    • Contact key suppliers and vendors to establish SLAs, and ensure they meet requirements.
    • Review supplier continuity plans.

    Technology & Physical Assets

    • No secondary site or redundancy for critical IT systems
    • No documented end-to-end IT DR plan

    Tool: BCP Project Roadmap

    Prioritize and visualize BCP projects to present options to decision makers.

    Not all BCP projects can be tackled at once. Enable decision makers to defer, rather than outright reject, projects that aren’t feasible at this time.

    1. Configure the tool in Tab 1. Setup. Adjust criteria and definitions for criteria. Note that shaded columns are required for reporting purposes and can’t be modified.
    2. Add projects and action items in Tab 2. Data Entry. Fields highlighted in red are all required for the dashboard to populate. All other fields are optional but will provide opportunities to track more detailed data on project ideas.
    3. To generate the dashboard in Tab 3. Roadmap, open the Data ribbon and under Queries and Connections click Refresh All. You can now use the slicers on the right of the sheet.

    Download Info-Tech’s BCP Project Roadmap Tool

    Demonstrate BCP project impacts

    Illustrate the benefits of proposed projects.

    1. Review your recovery workflow.
    2. Make updates to a second copy of the high-level outline to illustrate how the business response to a disaster scenario will change once proposed projects are complete.
    • Remove steps that have been made unnecessary.
    • Remove any risks or gaps that have been mitigated or addressed.
    • Verify that proposed projects close gaps between acceptable and achievable recovery capabilities in the BIA tool.
  • The visual impact of a shorter, less-risky recovery workflow can help communicate the benefits of proposed projects to decision makers.
  • Step 3.3

    Evaluate business continuity site and command center options

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Take a deep dive on the requirements for working from an alternate location.
    • Assess different options for an alternate location.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • BCP Coordinator
    • Pilot Business Unit Manager
    • Expert Business Unit Staff

    In this step, you’ll use these tools and templates:

    Outcomes & Insights

    Identify requirements for an alternate business site.

    Tool: Relocation Checklists

    An alternate site could be another company building, a dedicated emergency operations center, or work-from-home. Use this tool to guide and prepare for any relocation exercise.

    • Coordinate your response with the pre-populated checklists in Tabs 1 & 2, identify who’s responsible for items on the checklists, and update your recovery workflows to reflect new steps. When reviewing the checklist, consider what can be done to prepare ahead of a crisis.
      • For example, you may wish to create crisis communication templates to streamline crisis communications during a disaster.
    • Calculate the effort required to provision equipment for relocated users in Tabs 3 & 4.
    • Evaluate your options for alternate sites with the requirements matrix in Tab 5. Use your evaluation to identify how the organization could address shortcomings of viable options either ahead of time or at the time of an incident.

    Download Info-Tech’s BCP Relocation Checklists

    Create a checklist of requirements for an alternate site

    Leverage the roll-up view, in tab 3, of dependencies required to create a list of requirements for an alternate site in tab 4.

    1. The table on Tab 5 of the relocation checklists is pre-populated with some common requirements. Modify or replace requirements to suit your needs for an alternate business/office site. Be sure to consider distance, transportation, needed services, accessibility, IT infrastructure, security, and seating capacity at a minimum.
    2. Don’t assume. Verify. Confirm anything that requires permissions from the site owner. What network providers have a presence in the building? Can you access the site 24/7 and conduct training exercises? What facilities and services are available? Are you guaranteed the space if needed?

    "There are horror stories about organizations that assumed things about their alternate site that they later found out they weren’t true in practice." – Dr. Bernard Jones, MBCI CBCP

    Info-Tech Insight

    If you choose a shared location as a BCP site, a regional disaster may put you in competition with other tenants for space.

    Identify a command center

    For command center and alternate worksite selection, remember that most incidents are local and short term. Identify an onsite and an offsite command center.

    1. For events where the building is not compromised, identify an onsite location, ideally with remote conferencing capabilities and planning and collaboration tools (projectors, whiteboards, flipcharts). The onsite location can also be used for BCM and crisis management meetings. Remember, most business continuity events are not regional or massively destructive.
    2. For the offsite command center, select a location that is sufficiently far away from your normal business location to maintain separation from local incidents while minimizing commute time. However, consider a geographically distant option (e.g. more than 50 miles away) identified for those scenarios where it is a regional disaster, or plan to leverage online tools to create a virtual command center (see the Insight box below).
    3. The first members of the Emergency Response Team to be notified of the incident will determine which location to use or whether a third alternative is required.

    Info-Tech Insight

    For many organizations, a dedicated command center (TVs on the wall, maps and charts in filing cabinets) isn’t necessary. A conference bridge and collaboration tools allowing everyone to work remotely can be an acceptable offsite command center as long as digital options can meet your command center requirements.

    Create a plan for a return to normal

    Operating in continuity mode for an extended period of time tends to result in higher costs and reduced business capabilities. It’s important to restore normal operations as soon as possible.

    Advance planning can minimize risks and delays in returning to normal operations.

    Leverage the methodology and tools in this blueprint to define your return to normal (repatriation) procedures:

    1. Repeat the tabletop planning exercise to determine the repatriation steps and potential gaps. How will you return to the primary site from your alternate site? Does data need to be re-entered into core systems if IT services are down? Do you need to transfer job duties back to primary staff?
    2. What needs to be done to address the gaps in the return to normal workflow? Are there projects or action items that could make return to normal easier?

    For more on supporting a business move back to the office from the IT perspective, see Responsibly Resume IT Operations in the Office

    Potential business impacts of ongoing operations at a failover site

    • The cost of leasing alternate business worksites.
    • Inability to deliver on strategic initiatives while in emergency/interim operations mode, resulting in lost business opportunities.
    • A growing backlog of work that falls outside of emergency operations mode.
    • Travel and accommodation costs if the alternate site is geographically remote.
    • Additional vendor licensing and contract costs.

    Phase 4

    Extend the Results of the Pilot BCP and Implement Governance

    Phase 4

    4.1 Consolidate BCP pilot insights to support an overall BCP project plan

    4.2 Outline a business continuity management (BCM) program

    4.3 Test and maintain your BCP

    Insights & Outcomes

    Summarize and consolidate your initial insights and documentation. Create a project plan for overall BCP. Identify teams, responsibilities, and accountabilities, and assign documentation ownership. Integrate BCP findings in DR and crisis management practices. Set guidelines for testing, plan maintenance, training, and awareness.

    Participants

    • BCP Coordinator
    • Pilot Business Unit Manager
    • BCP Executive Sponsor

    Step 4.1

    Consolidate BCP pilot insights to support an overall BCP project plan

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Summarize and consolidate outputs and key insights from the BCP pilot.
    • Identify outputs from the pilot that can be re-used for the overall BCP.
    • Create a project charter for an overall BCP.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • BCP Coordinator
    • Pilot Business Unit Manager
    • BCP Executive Sponsor

    In this step, you’ll use these tools and templates:

    Outcomes & Insights

    Present results from the pilot BCP, and outline how you’ll use the pilot process with other business units to create an overall continuity program.

    Structure the overall BCP program.

    Template: BCP Pilot Results Presentation

    Highlight key findings from the BCP pilot to make the case for next steps.

    • Highlight critical gaps or risks identified, any potential process improvements, and progress made toward improving overall BCP maturity through the pilot project. Summarize the benefits of the pilot project for an executive audience.
    • Review process recovery objectives (RTO/RPO). Provide an overview of recovery capabilities (RTA/RPA). Highlight any significant gaps between objectives and capabilities.
    • Propose next steps, including an overall BCP project and program, and projects and action items to remediate gaps and risks.
    • Develop a project plan to estimate resource requirements for an overall BCP project prior to delivering this presentation. Quantifying required time and resources is a key outcome as it enables the remaining business units to properly scope and resource their BCP development activities and can help managers overcome the fear of the unknown.

    Download Info-Tech’s BCP Pilot Results Presentation

    Tool: BCP Summary

    Sum up information from completed BCP documents to create a high-level BCP overview for auditors and executives.

    The BCP Summary document is the capstone to business unit continuity planning exercises. It consolidates your findings in a short overview of your business continuity requirements, capabilities, and maintenance procedures.

    Info-Tech recommends embedding hyperlinks within the Summary to the rest of your BCP documentation to allow the reader to drill down further as needed. Leverage the following documents:

    • Business Impact Analysis
    • BCP Recovery Workflows
    • Business Process Workflows
    • BCP Project Roadmap
    • BCP Relocation Checklists
    • Business Continuity Policy

    Download Info-Tech’s BCP Summary Document

    Reuse templates for additional exercises

    The same methodology described in this blueprint can be repeated for each business unit. Also, many of the artifacts from the BCP pilot can be reused or built upon to give the remaining business units a head start. For example:

    • BCP Pilot Project Charter Template. Make a copy to use as a base for the next business unit’s BCP project charter, and update the stakeholders/roles and milestone dates. The rest of the content can remain the same in most cases.
    • BCP Reference Workbook. This tool contains information common to all business units and can be updated as needed.
    • BCP Business Impact Analysis Tool. You may need to start a separate copy for each business unit to allow enough space to capture all business processes. However, use the same scoring scale to drive consistent assessments. In addition, the scoring completed by the pilot business unit provides an example and benchmark for assessing other business processes.
    • BCP Recovery Workflow. The notification, assessment, and declaration steps can be standardized so remaining business units can focus primarily on recovery after a disaster is declared. Similarly, many of the steps related to alternate sites and IT workarounds will also apply to other business units.
    • BCP Project Roadmap Tool. Many of the projects identified by the pilot business unit will also apply to other business units – update the list as needed.
    • The Business Unit BCP Prioritization Tool, BCP Executive Presentation, and Business Continuity Policy Template do not need to be updated for each business unit.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    You may need to create some artifacts that are site specific. For example, relocation plans or emergency plans may not be reusable from one site to another. Use your judgement to reuse as much of the templates as you can – similar templates simplify audit, oversight, and plan management.

    Create an Overall BCP Project Charter

    Modify the pilot project charter to encompass the larger BCP project.

    Adjust the pilot charter to answer the following questions:

    • How much time and effort should the rest of the project take, based on findings from the pilot? When do you expect to meet certain milestones? What outputs and outcomes are expected?
    • In what order should additional business units complete their BCP? Who needs to be involved?
    • What projects to address continuity gaps were identified during the pilot? What investments will likely be required?
    • What additional documentation is required? This section and the appendix include templates to document your BCM Policy, Teams & Contacts, your notification procedures, and more.
    • How does this integrate with the other areas of business resilience and continuity (IT disaster recovery planning and crisis management planning)?
    • What additional activities, such as testing, are required?

    Prioritize business units for further BCP activities.

    As with the pilot, choose a business unit, or business units, where BCP will have the greatest impact and where further BCP activities will have the greatest likelihood of success. Prioritize business units that are critical to many areas of the business to get key results sooner.

    Work with one business unit at a time if:

    • Required resources from the business unit are available to focus on BCP full-time over a short period (one to two weeks).
    • More hands-on guidance (less delegation) is needed.
    • The business unit is large or has complex processes.

    Work with several business units at the same time if:

    • Required resources are only available sporadically over a longer period of time.
    • Less guidance (more delegation) is possible.
    • All business units are small and have well-documented processes.

    Download Info-Tech’s Business Unit BCP Prioritization Tool

    Step 4.2

    Outline a Business Continuity Management (BCM) Program

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Identify teams and roles for BCP and business continuity management.
    • Identify individuals to fill key roles.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • BCP Coordinator
    • Executive Sponsor

    In this step, you’ll use these tools and templates:

    Outcomes & Insights

    Document BCP teams, roles, and responsibilities.

    Document contact information, alternates, and succession rules.

    Outline a Business Continuity Management Program

    A BCM program, also known as a BCM system, helps structure business continuity activities and practices to deliver long-term benefits to your business.

    A BCM program should:

    • Establish who is responsible and accountable for BCP practices, activities, and documentation, and set documentation management practices.
    • Define a process to improve plans. Review and update continuity requirements, suggest enhancements to recovery capabilities, and measure progress and improvements to the plan over time.
    • Coordinate disaster recovery, business continuity, and crisis management planning outputs and practices.
    • Communicate the value of the continuity program to the organization.

    Develop a Business Continuity Management Program

    Phase 4 of this blueprint will focus on the following elements of a business continuity management program:

    • BCM Roles, Responsibilities, and Accountabilities
    • BCM Document Management Practices
    • Integrate BC, IT DR, Crisis Management, and Emergency Management
    • Business Continuity Plan maintenance and testing
    • Training and awareness

    Schedule a call with an Info-Tech Analyst for help building out these core elements, and for advice on developing the rest of your BCM program.

    Create BCM teams

    Include a mix of strong leaders and strong planners on your BC management teams.

    BC management teams (including the secondary teams such as the emergency response team) have two primary roles:

    1. Preparation, Planning, and Governance: Conduct and consolidate business impact analyses. Review, and support the development of recovery workflows, including emergency response plans and business unit recovery workflows. Organize testing and training. Report on the state of the continuity plan.
    2. Leadership During a Crisis: Coordinate and support the execution of business recovery processes. To meet these goals, each team needs a mix of skill sets.

    Crisis leaders require strong crisis management skills:

    • Ability to make quick decisions under pressure with incomplete information.
    • Excellent verbal communication skills.
    • Strong leadership skills. Calm in stressful situations.
    • Team leaders are ideally, but not necessarily, those with the most senior title on each team. It’s more important that the team leader has the appropriate skill set.

    Collectively, the team must include a broad range of expertise as well as strong planning skills:

    • Diverse expertise to be able to plan for and respond to a wide range of potential incidents, from health and safety to reputational damage.
    • Excellent organizational skills and attention to detail.
    • Excellent written communication skills.

    Note: For specific BC team roles and responsibilities, including key resources such as Legal, HR, and IT SMEs required to prepare for and execute crisis management plans, see Implement Crisis Management Best Practices.

    Structure the BCM Team

    Create a hierarchy of teams to govern and coordinate business continuity planning and crisis management.

    BCM Team: Govern business continuity, DR, and crisis management planning. Support the organization’s response to a crisis, including the decision to declare a disaster or emergency.

    Emergency Response Teams: Assist staff and BC teams during a crisis, with a focus first on health and safety. There’s usually one team per location. Develop and maintain emergency response plans.

    Emergency Response Teams: Assist staff and BC teams during a crisis, with a focus first on health and safety. There’s usually one team per location. Develop and maintain emergency response plans.

    IT Disaster Recovery Team: Manage the recovery of IT services and data following an incident. Develop and maintain the IT DRP.

    Business Unit BCP Teams: Coordinate business process recovery at the business unit level. Develop and maintain business unit BCPs.

    “Planning Mode”

    Executive Team → BC Management Team ↓

    • Emergency Response Teams (ERT)
    • Crisis Management Team
    • IT DR Management Team
    • Business Unit BCP Teams

    “Crisis Mode”

    Executive Team ↔Crisis Management Team↓ ↔ Emergency Response Teams (ERT)

    • BC Management Team
    • IT DR Management Team
    • Business Unit BCP Teams

    For more details on specific roles to include on these teams, as well as more information on crisis management, review Info-Tech’s blueprint, Implement Crisis Management Best Practices.

    Tool: BCM Teams, Roles, Contacts, and Vendors

    Track teams, roles, and contacts in this template. It is pre-populated with roles and responsibilities for business continuity, crisis management, IT disaster recovery, emergency response, and vendors and suppliers critical to business operations.

    • Expect overlap across teams. For example, the BC Management Team will include representation from each secondary team to ensure plans are in sync. Similarly, both the Crisis Communication Team and BC Management Team should include a representative from your legal team to ensure legal issues are considered in communications as well as overall crisis management.
    • Clarify spending and decision authority for key members of each team during a crisis.

    Track contact information in this template only if you don’t have a more streamlined way of tracking it elsewhere.

    Download Info-Tech’s Business Continuity Teams and Roles Tool

    Manage key vendors

    Review supplier capabilities and contracts to ensure they meet your requirements.

    Suppliers and vendors might include:

    • Material shipments
    • IT/telecoms service providers
    • Integrators and business process outsourcing providers
    • Independent contractors
    • Utilities (power, water, etc.)

    Supplier RTOs and RPOs should align with the acceptable RTOs and RPOs defined in the BIA. Where they do not, explore options for improvement.

    Confirm the following:

    1. The supplier’s own BC/DR capabilities – how they would recover their own operations in a disaster scenario.
    2. Any continuity services the supplier provides – how they can help you recover your operations in a disaster scenario.
    3. Their existing contractual obligations for service availability (e.g. SLAs).

    Download Info-Tech’s BCP Supplier Evaluation Questionnaire

    Organize your BCMS documentation

    Your BCP isn’t any one document. It’s multiple documents that work together.

    Continue to work through any additional required documentation. Build a repository where master copies of each document will reside and can be updated as required. Assign ownership of document management to someone with an understanding of the process (e.g. the BCP Coordinator).

    Governance Recovery
    BCMS Policy BCP Summary Core BCP Recovery Workflows
    Business Process Workflows Action Items & Project Roadmap BCP Recovery Checklists
    BIA Teams, Roles, Contact Information BCP Business Process Workarounds and Recovery Checklists
    BCP Maturity Scorecard BCP Project Charter Additional Recovery Workflows
    Business Unit Prioritization Tool BCP Presentation

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Recovery documentation has a different audience, purpose, and lifecycle than governance documentation, and keeping the documents separate can help with content management. Disciplined document management keeps the plan current and accessible.

    Align your IT DRP with your BCP

    Use the following BCP outputs to inform your DRP:

    • Business process technology dependencies. This includes technology not controlled by IT (e.g. cloud-based services).
    • RTOs and RPOs for business processes.
    • Technology projects identified by the business to improve resilience (e.g. improved mobility support).
    PCP Outputs DRP Activities
    Business processes defined Identify critical applications

    Dependencies identified:

    • People
    • Enterprise tech
    • Personal devices
    • Workspace and facilities
    • Services and other inputs

    Identify IT dependencies:

    • Infrastructure
    • Secondary applications

    Recovery objectives defined:

    • BIA and RTOs/RPOs
    • Recovery workflows

    Identify recovery objectives:

    • BIA and RTOs/RPOs
    • IT Recovery workflows

    Projects identified to close gaps:

    • Resourcing changes (e.g. training secondary staff)
    • Process changes (e.g. optimize processes and define interim processes)
    • Technology changes (e.g. improving mobility)

    Identify projects to close gaps:

    • Projects to improve DR capability (e.g. data replication, standby systems).
    • Projects to improve resiliency (e.g. redundant components)

    Info-Tech Insight

    Don’t think of inconsistencies between your DRP and BCP as a problem. Discrepancies between the plans are part of the discovery process, and they’re an opportunity to have a conversation that can improve alignment between IT service capabilities and business needs. You should expect that there will be discrepancies – managing discrepancies is part of the ongoing process to refine and improve both plans.

    Schedule activities to keep BC and DR in sync

    BC/DR Planning Workflow

    1. Collect BCP outputs that impact IT DRP (e.g. technology RTOs/RPOs).

    2. As BCPs are done, BCP Coordinator reviews outputs with IT DRP Management Team.

    3. Use the RTOs/RPOs from the BCPs as a starting point to determine IT recovery plans.

    4. Identify investments required to meet business-defined RTOs/RPOs, and validate with the business.

    5. Create a DR technology roadmap to meet validated RTOs/RPOs.

    6. Review and update business unit BCPs to reflect updated RTOs/RPOs.

    Find and address shadow IT

    Reviewing business processes and dependencies can identify workarounds or shadow IT solutions that weren’t visible to IT and haven’t been included in IT’s DR plan.

    • If you identify technology process dependencies that IT didn’t know about, it can be an opportunity to start a conversation about service support. This can be a “teachable moment” to highlight the risks of adopting and implementing technology solutions without consulting IT.
    • Highlight the possible impact of using technology services that aren’t supported by IT. For example:
      • RTOs and RPOs may not be in line with business requirements.
      • Costs could be higher than supported solutions.
      • Security controls may not be in line with compliance requirements.
      • IT may not be able to offer support when the service breaks or build new features or functionality that might be required in the future.
    • Make sure that if IT is expected to support shadow IT solutions, these systems are included in the IT DRP and that the risks and costs of supporting the non-core solution are clear to all parties and are compared to an alternative, IT-recommended solutions.

    Shadow IT can be a symptom of larger service support issues. There should be a process for requesting and tracking non-standard services from IT with appropriate technical, security, and management oversight.

    Review and reprioritize BC projects to create an overall BC project roadmap

    Assign the BCP Coordinator the task of creating a master list of BC projects, and then work with the BC management team to review and reprioritize this list, as described below:

    1. Build a list of BC projects as you work with each business unit.
      1. Add proposed projects to a master copy of the BCP Project Roadmap Tool
      2. For each subsequent business unit, copy project names, scoring, and timelines into the master roadmap tool.
    2. Work with the Executive Sponsor, the IT BCM representative, and the BCM team to review and reprioritize projects.
      1. In the master BCP Project Roadmap Tool, review and update project scoring, taking into account the relative importance of each project within the overall list. Rationalize the list (e.g. eliminate duplicate projects).
    3. The project roadmap is a suggested list of projects at this stage. Assign a project sponsor and project manager (from the BC management team or appropriate delegates) to each project to take it through your organization’s normal project scoping and approval process.

    Improving business continuity capabilities is a marathon, not a sprint. Change for the better is still change and introduces risk – massive changes introduce massive risk. Incremental changes help minimize disruption. Use Info-Tech research to deliver organizational change.

    "Developing a BCP can be like solving a Rubik’s Cube. It’s a complex, interdepartmental concern with multiple and sometimes conflicting objectives. When you have one side in place, another gets pushed out of alignment." – Ray Mach, BCP Expert

    Step 4.3

    Test and maintain your BCP

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Create additional documentation to support your business continuity plan.
    • Create a repository for documentation, and assign ownership for BCP documentation.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • BCP Coordinator

    In this step, you’ll use these tools and templates:

    Outcomes & Insights

    Create a plan to maintain the BCP.

    Iterate on your plan

    Tend your garden, and pull the weeds.

    Mastery comes through practice and iteration. Iterating on and testing your plan will help you keep up to date with business changes, identify plan improvements, and help your organization’s employees develop a mindset of continuity readiness. Maintenance drives continued success; don’t let your plan become stagnant, messy, and unusable.

    Your BCM program should structure BCP reviews and updates by answering the following:

    1. When do we review the plan?
    2. What are the goals of a review?
    3. Who must lead reviews and update BCP documents?
    4. How do we track reviews, tests, and updates?

    Structure plan reviews

    There are more opportunities for improvements than just planned reviews.

    At a minimum, review goals should include:

    1. Identify and document changes to BCP requirements.
    2. Identify and document changes to BCP capabilities.
    3. Identify gaps and risks and ways to remediate risks and close gaps.

    Who leads reviews and updates documents?

    The BCP Coordinator is likely heavily involved in facilitating reviews and updating documentation, at least at first. Look for opportunities to hand off document ownership to the business units over time.

    How do we track reviews, tests, and updates?

    Keep track of your good work by keeping a log of document changes. If you don’t have one, you can use the last tab on the BCP-DRP Maintenance Checklist.

    When do we review the plan?

    1. Scheduled reviews: At a minimum, plan reviews once a year. Plan owners should review the documents, identify needed updates, and notify the coordinator of any changes to their plan.
    2. As-needed reviews: Project launches, major IT upgrades, office openings or moves, organizational restructuring – all of these should trigger a BCP review.
    3. Testing exercises: Schedule controlled exercises to test and improve different aspects of your continuity plan, and ensure that lessons learned become part of plan documentation.
    4. Retrospectives: Take the opportunity to learn from actual continuity events and crises by conducting retrospectives to evaluate your response and brainstorm improvements.

    Conduct a retrospective after major incidents

    Use a retrospective on your COVID-19 response as a starting point. Build on the questions below to guide the conversation.

    • If needed, how did we set up remote work for our users? What worked, and what didn’t?
    • Did we discover any long-term opportunities to improve business processes?
    • Did we use any continuity plans we have documented?
    • Did we effectively prioritize business processes for recovery?
    • Were expectations from our business users in line with our plans?
    • What parts of our plan worked, and where can we improve the plan?
    1. Gather stakeholders and team members
    2. Ask:
      1. What happened?
      2. What did we learn?
      3. What did we do well?
      4. What should we have done differently?
      5. What gaps should we take action to address?
    3. Prepare a plan to take action

    Outcomes and benefits

    • Confirm business priorities.
    • Validate that business recovery solutions and procedures are effective in meeting business requirements (i.e. RTOs and RPOs).
    • Identify gaps in continuity resources, procedures, or documentation, and options to close gaps.
    • Build confidence in the response team and recovery capabilities.

    Tool: Testing and Maintenance Schedule

    Build a light-weight maintenance schedule for your BCP and DRP plans.

    This tool helps you set a schedule for plan update activities, identify document and exercise owners, and log updates for audit and governance purposes.

    • Add the names of your documents and brainstorm update activities.
    • Activities (document updates, testing, etc.) might be scheduled regularly, as-needed, or both. If they happen “as needed,” identify the trigger for the activity.
    • Start tracking past activities and resulting changes in Tab 3. You can also track crises that tested your continuity capabilities on this tab.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Everyone gets busy. If there’s a meeting you can schedule months in advance, schedule it months in advance! Then send reminders closer to the date. As soon as you’re done the pilot BCP, set aside time in everyone’s calendar for your first review session, whether that’s three months, six months, or a year from now.

    Appendix

    Additional BCP Tools and Templates

    Template Library: Business Continuity Policy

    Create a high-level policy to govern BCP and clarify BCP requirements.

    Use this template to:

    • Outline the organizational commitment to BCM.
    • Clarify the mandate to prepare, validate, and maintain continuity plans that align with business requirements.
    • Define specific policy statements that signatories to the policy are expected to uphold.
    • Require key stakeholders to review and sign off on the template.

    Download Info-Tech’s Business Continuity Policy template

    Template Library: Workarounds & Recovery Checklists

    Capture the step-by-step details to execute workarounds and steps in the business recovery process.

    If you require more detail to support your recovery procedures, you can use this template to:

    • Record specific steps or checklists to support specific workarounds or recovery procedures.
    • Identify prerequisites for workarounds or recovery procedures.

    Download Info-Tech’s BCP Process Workarounds & Recovery Checklists Template

    Template Library: Notification, Assessment, Declaration

    Create a procedure that outlines the conditions for assessing a disaster situation and invoking the business continuity plan.

    Use this template to:

    • Guide the process whereby the business is notified of an incident, assesses the situation, and declares a disaster.
    • Set criteria for activating business continuity plans.
    • Review examples of possible events, and suggest options on how the business might proceed or react.

    Download Info-Tech’s BCP Notification, Assessment, and Disaster Declaration Plan template

    Template Library: BCP Recovery Workflow Example

    Review an example of BCP recovery workflows.

    Use this template to:

    • Generate ideas for your own recovery processes.
    • See real examples of recovery processes for warehousing, supply, and distribution operations.
    • Review an example of working BCP documentation.

    Download Info-Tech’s BCP Recovery Workflows Example

    Create a Pandemic Response Plan

    If you’ve been asked to build a pandemic-specific response plan, use your core BCP findings to complete these pandemic planning documents.

    • At the onset of the COVID-19 crisis, IT departments were asked to rapidly ramp up work-from-home capabilities and support other process workarounds.
    • IT managers already knew that obstacles to working from home would go beyond internet speed and needing a laptop. Business input is critical to uncover unexpected obstacles.
    • IT needed to address a range of issues from security risk to increased service desk demand from users who don’t normally work from home.
    • Workarounds to speed the process up had to be balanced with good IT practices and governance (Asset Management, Security, etc.)
    • If you’ve been asked to update your Pandemic Response Plan, use this template and your core BCP deliverables to deliver a set of streamlined documentation that draws on lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Structure HR’s role in the pandemic plan

    Leverage the following materials from Info-Tech’s HR-focused sister company, McLean & Company.

    These HR research resources live on the website of Info-Tech’s sister company, McLean & Company. Contact your Account Manager to gain access to these resources.

    Summary of Accomplishment

    Knowledge Gained

    This blueprint outlined:

    • The streamlined approach to BCP development.
    • A BIA process to identify acceptable, appropriate recovery objectives.
    • Tabletop planning exercises to document and validate business recovery procedures.

    Processes Optimized

    • Business continuity development processes were optimized, from business impact analysis to incident response planning.
    • In addition, pilot business unit processes were identified and clarified to support BCP development, which also provided the opportunity to review and optimize those processes.

    Key Deliverables Completed

    • Core BCP deliverables for the pilot business unit, including a business impact analysis, recovery workflows, and a project roadmap.
    • BCP Executive Presentation to communicate pilot results as well as a summary of the methodology to the executive team.
    • BCP Summary to provide a high-level view of BCP scope, objectives, capabilities, and requirements.

    If you would like additional support, have our analysts guide you through other phases as part of an Info-Tech workshop.

    Contact your account representative for more information.

    workshops@infotech.com

    1-888-670-8889

    Research Contributors and Experts

    Dr. Bernard A. Jones, MBCI, CBCP

    Professor and Continuity Consultant Berkeley College

    Dr. Jones is a professor at Berkeley College within the School of Professional Studies teaching courses in Homeland Security and Emergency Management. He is a member of the National Board of Directors for the Association of Continuity Professionals (ACP) as well as the Information & Publications Committee Chair for the Garden State Chapter of the ACP. Dr. Jones earned a doctorate degree in Civil Security Leadership, Management & Policy from New Jersey City University where his research focus was on organizational resilience.

    Kris L. Roberson

    Disaster Recovery Analyst Veterans United Home Loans

    Kris Roberson is the Disaster Recovery Analyst for Veterans United Home Loans, the #1 VA mortgage lender in the US. Kris oversees the development and maintenance of the Veterans United Home Loans DR program and leads the business continuity program. She is responsible for determining the broader strategies for DR testing and continuity planning, as well as the implementation of disaster recovery and business continuity technologies, vendors, and services. Kris holds a Masters of Strategic Leadership with a focus on organizational change management and a Bachelors in Music. She is a member of Infragard, the National Association of Professional Women, and Sigma Alpha Iota, and holds a Project+ certification.

    Trevor Butler

    General Manager of Information Technology City of Lethbridge

    As the General Manager of Information Technology with the City of Lethbridge, Trevor is accountable for providing strategic management and advancement of the city’s information technology and communications systems consistent with the goals and priorities of the corporation while ensuring that corporate risks are appropriately managed. He has 15+ years of progressive IT leadership experience, including 10+ years with public sector organizations. He holds a B.Mgt. and PMP certification along with masters certificates in both Project Management and Business Analysis.

    Robert Miller

    Information Services Director Witt/Kieffer

    Bob Miller is the Information Services Director at Witt/Kieffer. His department provides end-user support for all company-owned devices and software for Oak Brook, the regional offices, home offices, and traveling employees. The department purchases, implements, manages, and monitors the infrastructure, which includes web hosting, networks, wireless solutions, cell phones, servers, and file storage. Bob is also responsible for the firm’s security planning, capacity planning, and business continuity and disaster preparedness planning to ensure that the firm has functional technology to conduct business and continue business growth.

    Related Info-Tech Research

    Create a Right-Sized Disaster Recovery Plan

    Close the gap between your DR capabilities and service continuity requirements.

    Create Visual SOP Documents that Drive Process Optimization, Not Just Peace of Mind

    Go beyond satisfying auditors to drive process improvement, consistent IT operations, and effective knowledge transfer.

    Select the Optimal Disaster Recovery Deployment Model

    Determine which deployment models, including hybrid solutions, best meet your DR requirements.

    Bibliography

    “Business Continuity Planning.” IT Examination HandBook. The Federal Financial Institution Examination Council (FFIEC), February 2015. Web.

    “Business Continuity Plans and Emergency Contact Information.” FINRA, 12 February 2015. Web.

    “COBIT 5: A Business Framework for the Governance and Management of Enterprise IT.” ISACA, n.d. Web.

    Disaster Resource GUIDE. Emergency Lifeline Corporation, n.d. Web.

    “DR Rules & Regulations.” Disaster Recovery Journal, March 2017. Web.

    “Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA).” Homeland Security, 2014. Web.

    FEMA. “Planning & Templates.” FEMA, n.d. Web.

    “FINRA-SEC-CFTC Joint Advisory (Regulatory Notice 13-25).” FINRA, August 2013. Web.

    Gosling, Mel and Andrew Hiles. “Business Continuity Statistics: Where Myth Meets Fact.” Continuity Central, 24 April 2009. Web.

    Hanwacker, Linda. “COOP Templates for Success Workbook.” The LSH Group, 2016. Web.

    Potter, Patrick. “BCM Regulatory Alphabet Soup – Part Two.” RSA Link, 28 August 2012. Web.

    The Good Practice Guidelines. Business Continuity Institute, 2013. Web.

    Wang, Dashun and James A. Evans. “When Small Teams are Better than Big Ones.” Harvard Business Review, 21 February 2019. Web.

    Rationalize Your Collaboration Tools

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}51|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 7.3/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: 10 Average Days Saved
    • member rating average days saved: After each Info-Tech experience, we ask our members to quantify the real-time savings, monetary impact, and project improvements our research helped them achieve.
    • Parent Category Name: End-User Computing Applications
    • Parent Category Link: /end-user-computing-applications
    • Organizations collaboration toolsets are increasingly disordered and overburdened. Not only do organizations waste money by purchasing tools that overlap with their current toolset, but also employees’ productivity is destroyed by having to spend time switching between multiple tools.
    • Shadow IT is easier than ever. Without suitable onboarding and agreed-upon practices, employees will seek out their own solutions for collaboration. No transparency of what tools are being used means that information shared through shadow IT cannot be coordinated, monitored, or regulated effectively.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Best-of-breed approaches create more confusion than productivity. Collaboration toolsets should be as streamlined as possible.
    • Employee-led initiatives to implement new toolsets are more successful. Focus on what is a suitable fit for employees’ needs.
    • Strategizing toolsets enhances security. File transfers and communication through unmonitored, unapproved tools increases phishing and hacking risks.

    Impact and Result

    • Categorize your current collaboration toolset, identifying genuine overlaps and gaps in your collaboration capabilities.
    • Work through our best-practice recommendations to decide which redundant overlapping tools should be phased out.
    • Build business requirements to fill toolset gaps and create an adoption plan for onboarding new tools.
    • Create a collaboration strategy that documents collaboration capabilities, rationalizes them, and states which capability to use when.

    Rationalize Your Collaboration Tools Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out how to create a collaboration strategy that will improve employee efficiency and save the organization time and money.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Evaluate current toolset

    Identify and categorize current collaboration toolset usage to recognize unnecessary overlaps and legitimate gaps.

    • Rationalize Your Collaboration Tools – Phase 1: Evaluate Current Toolset
    • Identifying and Categorizing Shadow Collaboration Tools Survey
    • Overlaps and Gaps in Current Collaboration Toolset Template

    2. Strategize toolset overlaps

    Evaluate overlaps to determine which redundant tools should be phased out and explore best practices for how to do so.

    • Rationalize Your Collaboration Tools – Phase 2: Strategize Toolset Overlaps
    • Phase-Out Plan Gantt Chart Template
    • Phase-Out Plan Marketing Materials

    3. Fill toolset gaps

    Fill your collaboration toolset gaps with best-fit tools, build business requirements for those tools, and create an adoption plan for onboarding.

    • Rationalize Your Collaboration Tools – Phase 3: Fill Toolset Gaps
    • Adoption Plan Gantt Chart Template
    • Adoption Plan Marketing Materials
    • Collaboration Tools Business Requirements Document Template
    • Collaboration Platform Evaluation Tool
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Rationalize Your Collaboration Tools

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Categorize the Toolset

    The Purpose

    Create a collaboration vision.

    Acknowledge the current state of the collaboration toolset.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A clear framework to structure the collaboration strategy

    Activities

    1.1 Set the vision for the Collaboration Strategy.

    1.2 Identify your collaboration tools with use cases.

    1.3 Learn what collaboration tools are used and why, including shadow IT.

    1.4 Begin categorizing the toolset.

    Outputs

    Beginnings of the Collaboration Strategy

    At least five archetypical use cases, detailing the collaboration capabilities required for these cases

    Use cases updated with shadow IT currently used within the organization

    Overlaps and Gaps in Current Capabilities Toolset Template

    2 Strategize Overlaps

    The Purpose

    Identify redundant overlapping tools and develop a phase-out plan.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Communication and phase-out plans for redundant tools, streamlining the collaboration toolset.

    Activities

    2.1 Identify legitimate overlaps and gaps.

    2.2 Explore business and user strategies for identifying redundant tools.

    2.3 Create a Gantt chart and communication plan and outline post-phase-out strategies.

    Outputs

    Overlaps and Gaps in Current Capabilities Toolset Template

    A shortlist of redundant overlapping tools to be phased out

    Phase-out plan

    3 Build Business Requirements

    The Purpose

    Gather business requirements for finding best-fit tools to fill toolset gaps.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A business requirements document

    Activities

    3.1 Use SoftwareReviews and the Collaboration Platform Evaluation Tool to shortlist best-fit collaboration tool.

    3.2 Build SMART objectives and goals cascade.

    3.3 Walk through the Collaboration Tools Business Requirements Document Template.

    Outputs

    A shortlist of collaboration tools

    A list of SMART goals and a goals cascade

    Completed Business Requirements Document

    4 Create an Adoption Plan

    The Purpose

    Create an adoption plan for successfully onboarding new collaboration tools.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    An adoption plan

    Activities

    4.1 Fill out the Adoption Plan Gantt Chart Template.

    4.2 Create the communication plan.

    4.3 Explore best practices to socialize the new tools.

    Outputs

    Completed Gantt chart

    Adoption plan marketing materials

    Long-term strategy for engaging employees with onboarded tools

    Build a Software Quality Assurance Program

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}284|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.6/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $20,972 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 14 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Testing, Deployment & QA
    • Parent Category Link: /testing-deployment-and-qa
    • Today’s rapidly scaling and increasingly complex products create mounting pressure on delivery teams to release new systems and changes quickly and with sufficient quality.
    • Many organizations lack the critical capabilities and resources needed to satisfy their growing testing backlog, risking product success.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Testing is often viewed as a support capability rather than an enabler of business growth. It receives focus and investment only when it becomes a visible problem.
    • The rise in security risks, aggressive performance standards, constantly evolving priorities, and misunderstood quality policies further complicate QA as it drives higher expectations for effective practices.
    • QA starts with good requirements. Tests are only as valuable as the requirements they are validating and verifying. Early QA improves the accuracy of downstream tests and reduces costs of fixing defects late in delivery.
    • Quality is an organization-wide accountability. Upstream work can have extensive ramifications if all roles are not accountable for the decisions they make.
    • Quality must account for both business and technical requirements. Valuable change delivery is cemented in a clear understanding of quality from both business and IT perspectives.

    Impact and Result

    • Standardize your definition of a product. Come to an organizational agreement of what attributes define a high-quality product. Accommodate both business and IT perspectives in your definition.
    • Clarify the role of QA throughout your delivery pipeline. Indicate where and how QA is involved throughout product delivery. Instill quality-first thinking in each stage of your pipeline to catch defects and issues early.
    • Structure your test design, planning, execution, and communication practices to better support your quality definition and business and IT environments and priorities. Adopt QA good practices to ensure your tests satisfy your criteria for a high-quality and successful product.

    Build a Software Quality Assurance Program Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should build a strong foundation for quality, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Define your QA process

    Standardize your product quality definition and your QA roles, processes, and guidelines according to your business and IT priorities.

    • Build a Strong Foundation for Quality – Phase 1: Define Your QA Process
    • Test Strategy Template

    2. Adopt QA good practices

    Build a solid set of good practices to define your defect tolerances, recognize the appropriate test coverage, and communicate your test results.

    • Build a Strong Foundation for Quality – Phase 2: Adopt QA Good Practices
    • Test Plan Template
    • Test Case Template
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Build a Software Quality Assurance Program

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Define Your QA Process

    The Purpose

    Discuss your quality definition and how quality is interpreted from both business and IT perspectives.

    Review your case for strengthening your QA practice.

    Review the standardization of QA roles, processes, and guidelines in your organization.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Grounded understanding of quality that is accepted across IT and between the business and IT.

    Clear QA roles and responsibilities.

    A repeatable QA process that is applicable across the delivery pipeline.

    Activities

    1.1 List your QA objectives and metrics.

    1.2 Adopt your foundational QA process.

    Outputs

    Quality definition and QA objectives and metrics.

    QA guiding principles, process, and roles and responsibilities.

    2 Adopt QA Good Practices

    The Purpose

    Discuss the practices to reveal the sufficient degree of test coverage to meet your acceptance criteria, defect tolerance, and quality definition.

    Review the technologies and tools to support the execution and reporting of your tests.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    QA practices aligned to industry good practices supporting your quality definition.

    Defect tolerance and acceptance criteria defined against stakeholder priorities.

    Identification of test scenarios to meet test coverage expectations.

    Activities

    2.1 Define your defect tolerance.

    2.2 Model and prioritize your tests.

    2.3 Develop and execute your QA activities.

    2.4 Communicate your QA activities.

    Outputs

    Defect tolerance levels and courses of action.

    List of test cases and scenarios that meet test coverage expectations.

    Defined test types, environment and data requirements, and testing toolchain.

    Test dashboard and communication flow.

    Explore the Secrets of Oracle Cloud Licensing

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}142|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.5/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: 5 Average Days Saved
    • member rating average days saved: After each Info-Tech experience, we ask our members to quantify the real-time savings, monetary impact, and project improvements our research helped them achieve.
    • Parent Category Name: Licensing
    • Parent Category Link: /licensing
    • Organizations are considering moving workloads to the cloud; however, they often struggle to understand Oracle's licensing and services models.
    • Complexity of licensing and high price tags can make the renewal process an overwhelming experience.
    • Oracle’s SaaS applications are the most mature, but Oracle’s on-premises E-Business Suite still has functionality gaps in comparison to Oracle’s cloud apps.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Understand the Oracle agenda. Oracle has established a unique approach to their cloud offerings – they want all of your workloads on the Red Stack.
    • Communicate effectively. Be aware that Oracle will reach out to members at your organization at various levels. Having your executives on the same page is critical to successfully managing Oracle.
    • Negotiate hard. Oracle needs the deal more than the customer. Oracle's top leaders are heavily incentivized to drive massive cloud adoption and increase Oracle's share price. Use this to your advantage.

    Impact and Result

    • Conducting business with Oracle is not typical compared to other vendors. To emerge successfully from a commercial transaction with Oracle, customers must learn the “Oracle way” of conducting business, which includes a best-in-class sales structure, highly unique contracts, and license use policies coupled with a hyper-aggressive compliance function.
    • Leverage cloud spend to retire support on shelf-ware licenses, or gain virtualization rights for an on-premises environment.
    • Map out the process of how to negotiate from a position of strength, examining terms and conditions, discount percentages, and agreement pitfalls.
    • Carefully review key clauses in the Oracle Cloud Services Agreement to avoid additional spend and compliance risks.

    Explore the Secrets of Oracle Cloud Licensing Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should explore the secrets of Oracle Cloud licensing, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Evaluate licensing requirements

    Review current licensing options and models to determine which cloud products will most appropriately fit the organization's environment.

    • Oracle Cloud Services Agreement Terms and Conditions Evaluation Tool
    [infographic]

    Manage Requirements in an Agile Environment

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}522|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Requirements & Design
    • Parent Category Link: /requirements-and-design

    The process of navigating from waterfall to Agile can be incredibly challenging. Even more problematic; how do you operate your requirements management practices once there? There traditionally isn’t a role for a business analyst, the traditional keeper of requirements. It isn’t like switching on a light.

    You likely find yourself struggling to deliver high quality solutions and requirements in Agile. This is a challenge for many organizations, regardless of how long they’ve leveraged Agile.

    But you aren’t here for assurances. You’re here for answers and help.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    Agile and requirements management are complementary, not competitors.

    Impact and Result

    Info-Tech’s advice? Why choose? Why have to pick between traditional waterfall and Agile delivery? If Agile without analysis is a recipe for disaster, Agile with analysis is the solution. How can you leverage the Info-Tech approach to align your Agile and requirements management efforts into a powerful combination?

    Manage Requirements in an Agile Environment is your guide.

    Use the contents and exercises of this blueprint to gain a shared understanding of the two disciplines, to find your balance in your approach, to define your thresholds, and ultimately, to prepare for new ways of working.

    Manage Requirements in an Agile Environment Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Manage Requirements in an Agile Environment Blueprint – Agile and Requirements Management are complementary, not competitors

    Provides support and guidance for organizations struggling with their requirements management practices in Agile environments.

    • Manage Requirements in an Agile Environment Storyboard

    2. Agile Requirements Playbook – A practical playbook for aligning your teams, and articulating the guidelines for managing your requirements in Agile.

    The Agile Requirements Playbook becomes THE artifact for your Agile requirements practices. Great for onboarding, reviewing progress, and ensuring a shared understanding of your ways of working.

    • Agile Requirements Playbook

    3. Documentation Calculator – A tool for determining the right level of documentation for your organization, and whether you’re spending too much, or even not enough, on Agile Requirements documentation.

    The Documentation Calculator can inform your documentation decison making, ensuring you're investing just the right amount of time, money, and effort.

    • Documentation Calculator

    4. Agile Requirements Workbook – Supporting tools and templates in advancing your Agile Requirements practice, to be used in conjunction with the Agile Requirements Blueprint, and the Playbook.

    This workbook is designed to capture the results of your exercises in the Manage Requirements in an Agile Environment Storyboard. Each worksheet corresponds to an exercise in the storyboard. This is a tool for you, so customize the content and layout to best suit your product. The workbook is also a living artifact that should be updated periodically as the needs of your team and organization change.

    • Agile Requirements Workbook

    5. Agile Requirements Assessment – Establishes your current Agile requirements maturity, defines your target maturity, and supports planning to get there.

    The Agile Requirements Assessment is a great tool for determining your current capabilities and maturity in Agile and Business Analysis. You can also articulate your target state, which enables the identification of capability gaps, the creation of improvement goals, and a roadmap for maturing your Agile Requirements practice.

    • Agile Requirements Assessment

    Infographic

    Workshop: Manage Requirements in an Agile Environment

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Framing Agile and Business Analysis

    The Purpose

    Sets the context for the organization, to ensure a shared understanding of the benefits of both Agile and business analysis/requirements management.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Have a shared definition of Agile and business analysis / requirements.

    Understand the current state of Agile and business analysis in your organization.

    Activities

    1.1 Define what Agile and business analysis mean in your organization.

    1.2 Agile requirements assessment.

    Outputs

    Alignment on Agile and business analysis / requirements in your organization.

    A current and target state assessment of Agile and business analysis in your organization.

    2 Tailoring Your Approach

    The Purpose

    Confirm you’re going the right way for effective solution delivery.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Confirm the appropriate delivery methodology.

    Activities

    2.1 Confirm your selected methodology.

    Outputs

    Confidence in your selected project delivery methodology.

    3 Defining Your Requirements Thresholds

    The Purpose

    Provides the guardrails for your Agile requirements practice, to define a high-level process, roles and responsibilities, governance and decision-making, and how to deal with change.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Clearly defined interactions between the BA and their partners

    Define a plan for management and governance at the project team level

    Activities

    3.1 Define your agile requirements process.

    3.2 Define your agile requirements RACI.

    3.3 Define your governance.

    3.4 Define your change and backlog refinement plan.

    Outputs

    Agile requirements process.

    Agile requirements RACI.

    A governance and documentation plan.

    A change and backlog refinement approach.

    4 Planning Your Next Steps

    The Purpose

    Provides the action plan to achieve your target state maturity

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Recognize and prepare for the new ways of working for communication, stakeholder engagement, within the team, and across the organization.

    Establish a roadmap for next steps to mature your Agile requirements practice.

    Activities

    4.1 Define your stakeholder communication plan.

    4.2 Identify your capability gaps.

    4.3 Plan your agile requirements roadmap.

    Outputs

    A stakeholder communication plan.

    A list of capability gaps to achieve your desired target state.

    A prioritized roadmap to achieve the target state.

    5 Agile Requirements Techniques (Optional)

    The Purpose

    To provide practical guidance on technique usage, which can enable an improved experience with technical elements of the blueprint.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    An opportunity to learn new tools to support your Agile requirements practice.

    Activities

    5.1 Managing requirements' traceability.

    5.2 Creating and managing user stories.

    5.3 Managing your requirements backlog.

    5.4 Maintaining a requirements library.

    Outputs

    Support and advice for leveraging a given tool or technique.

    Support and advice for leveraging a given tool or technique.

    Support and advice for leveraging a given tool or technique.

    Support and advice for leveraging a given tool or technique.

    Further reading

    Manage Requirements in an Agile Environment

    Agile and requirements management are complementary, not competitors

    Analyst's Perspective

    The temptation when moving to Agile is to deemphasize good requirements practices in favor of perceived speed. If you're not delivering on the needs of the business then you have failed, regardless of how fast you've gone.

    Delivery in Agile doesn't mean you stop needing solid business analysis. In fact, it's even more critical, to ensure your products and projects are adding value. With the rise of Agile, the role of the business analyst has been misunderstood.

    As a result, we often throw out the analysis with the bathwater, thinking we'll be just fine without analysis, documentation, and deliberate action, as the speed and dexterity of Agile is enough.

    Consequently, what we get is wasted time, money, and effort, with solutions that fail to deliver value, or need to be re-worked to get it right.

    The best organizations find balance between these two forces, to align, and gain the benefits of both Agile and business analysis, working in tandem to manage requirements that bring solutions that are "just right".

    This is a picture of Vincent Mirabelli

    Vincent Mirabelli
    Principal Research Director, Applications Delivery and Management
    Info-Tech Research Group

    EXECUTIVE BRIEF

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    The process of navigating from waterfall to Agile can be incredibly challenging. And even more problematic; how do you operate your requirements management practices once there? Since there traditionally isn't a role for a business analyst; the traditional keeper of requirements. it isn't like switching on a light.

    You likely find yourself struggling to deliver high quality solutions and requirements in Agile. This is a challenge for many organizations, regardless of how long they've leveraged Agile.

    But you aren't here for assurances. You're here for answers and help.

    Common Obstacles

    many organizations and teams face is that there are so busy doing Agile that they fail to be Agile.

    Agile was supposed to be the saving grace of project delivery but is misguided in taking the short-term view of "going quickly" at the expense of important elements, such as team formation and interaction, stakeholder engagement and communication, the timing and sequencing of analysis work, decision-making, documentation, and dealing with change.

    The idea that good requirements just happen because you have user stories is wrong. So, requirements remain superficial, as you "can iterate later"…but sometimes later never comes, or doesn't come fast enough.

    Organizations need to be very deliberate when aligning their Agile and requirements management practices. The work is the same. How the work is done is what changes.

    Info-Tech's Approach

    Infotech's advice? Why choose? Why have to pick between traditional waterfall and Agile delivery? If Agile without analysis is a recipe for disaster, Agile with analysis is the solution. And how can you leverage the Info-Tech approach to align your Agile and requirements management efforts into a powerful combination?

    Manage Requirements in an Agile Environment is your guide.

    Use the contents and exercises of this blueprint to gain a shared understanding of the two disciplines, to find your balance in your approach, to define your thresholds, and ultimately, to prepare for new ways of working.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Agile and requirements management are complementary, not competitors.

    The temptation when moving to Agile is to deemphasize good requirements practices in favor of perceived speed. If you're not delivering on the needs of the business, then you have failed, regardless of how fast you've gone.

    Insight summary

    Overarching insight

    Agile and requirements management are complementary, not competitors.

    The temptation when moving to Agile is to deemphasize good requirements practices in favor of perceived speed. If you're not delivering on the needs of the business, then you have failed, regardless of how fast you've gone

    Phase 1 insight

    • The purpose of requirements in waterfall is for approval. The purpose in Agile is for knowledge management, as Agile has no memory.
    • When it comes to the Agile manifesto, "over" does not mean "instead of".
    • In Agile, the what of business analysis does doesn't change. What does change is the how and when that work happens.

    Phase 2 insight

    • Understand your uncertainties; it's a great way to decide what level of Agile (if any) is needed.
    • Finding your "Goldilocks" zone will take time. Be patient.

    Phase 3 insight

    • Right-size your governance, based on team dynamics and project complexity. A good referee knows when to step in, and when to let the game flow.
    • Agile creates a social contract amongst the team, and with their leaders and organization.
    • Documentation needs to be valuable. Do what is acceptable and necessary to move work to future steps. Not documenting also comes with a cost, but one you pay in the future. And that bill will come due, with interest (aka, technical debt, operational inefficiencies, etc.).
    • A lack of acceptable documentation makes it more difficult to have agility. You're constantly revalidating your current state (processes, practices and structure) and re-arguing decisions already made. This slows you down more than maintaining documentation ever would.

    Phase 4 insight

    • Making Agile predictable is hard, because people are not predictable; people are prone to chaos.

    There have been many challenges with waterfall delivery

    It turns out waterfall is not that great at reducing risk and ensuring value delivery after all

    • Lack of flexibility
    • Difficulty in measuring progress
    • Difficulties with scope creep
    • Limited stakeholder involvement
    • Long feedback loops

    48%
    Had project deadlines more than double

    85%
    Exceeded their original budget by at least 20%

    25%
    At least doubled their original budget

    This is an image of the waterfall project results

    Source: PPM Express.

    Agile was meant to address the shortcomings of waterfall

    The wait for solutions was too long for our business partners. The idea of investing significant time, money, and resources upfront, building an exhaustive and complete vision of the desired state, and then waiting months or even years to get that solution, became unpalatable for them. And rightfully so. Once we cast a light on the pains, it became difficult to stay with the status quo. Given that organizations evolve at a rapid pace, what was a pain at the beginning of an initiative may not be so even 6 months later.

    Agile became the answer.

    Since its' first appearance nearly 20 years ago, Agile has become the methodology of choice for a many of organizations. According to the 15th Annual State of Agile report, Agile adoption within software development teams increased from 37% in 2020 to 86% in 2021.

    Adopting Agile led to challenges with requirements

    Requirements analysis, design maturity, and management are critical for a successful Agile transformation.

    "One of the largest sources of failure we have seen on large projects is an immature Agile implementation in the context of poorly defined requirements."
    – "Large Scale IT Projects – From Nightmare to Value Creation"

    "Requirements maturity is more important to project outcomes than methodology."
    – "Business Analysis Benchmark: Full Report"

    "Mature Agile practices spend 28% of their time on analysis and design."
    – "Quantitative Analysis of Agile Methods Study (2017): Twelve Major Findings"

    "There exists a Requirements Premium… organizations using poor practices spent 62% more on similarly sized projects than organizations using the best requirements practices."
    – "The Business Case for Agile Business Analysis" - Requirements Engineering Magazine

    Strong stakeholder satisfaction with requirements results in higher satisfaction in other areas

    This is an image of a bar graph comparing the percentage of respondents with high stakeholder satisfaction, to the percentage of respondents with low stakeholder satisfaction for four different categories.  these include: Availability of IT Capacity to Complete Projects; Overall IT Projects; IT Projects Meet Business Needs; Overall IT Satisfaction

    N= 324 small organizations from Info-Tech Research Group's CIO Business Vision diagnostic.

    Note: High satisfaction was classified as organizations with a score greater or equal to eight and low satisfaction was every organization that scored below eight on the same questions.

    Info-Tech's Agile requirements framework

    This is an image of Info-Tech's Agile requirements framework.  The three main categories are: Sprint N(-1); Sprint N; Sprint N(+1)

    Agile requirements are a balancing act

    Collaboration

    Many subject matter experts are necessary to create accurate requirements, but their time is limited too.

    Communication

    Stakeholders should be kept informed throughout the requirements gathering process, but you need to get the right information to the right people.

    Documentation

    Recording, organizing, and presenting requirements are essential, but excessive documentation will slow time to delivery.

    Control

    Establishing control points in your requirements gathering process can help confirm, verify, and approve requirements accurately, but stage gates limit delivery.

    What changes for the business analyst?

    In Agile, the what of business analysis does not change.

    What does change is the how and when that work happens.

    Business analysts need to focus on six key elements when managing requirements in Agile.

    • Team formation and interaction
    • Stakeholder engagement and communication
    • The timing and sequencing of their work
    • Decision-making
    • Documentation
    • Dealing with change

    Where does the business analysis function fit on an Agile team?

    Team formation is key, as Agile is a team sport

    A business analyst in an Agile team typically interacts with several different roles, including:

    • The product owner,
    • The Sponsor or Executive
    • The development team,
    • Other stakeholders such as customers, end-users, and subject matter experts
    • The Design team,
    • Security,
    • Testing,
    • Deployment.

    This is an image the roles who typically interact with a Business Analyst.

    How we do our requirements work will change

    • Team formation and interaction
    • Stakeholder engagement and communication
    • The timing and sequencing of their work
    • Decision-making
    • Documentation
    • Dealing with change

    As a result, you'll need to focus on;

    • Emphasizing flexibility
    • Enabling continuous delivery
    • Enhancing collaboration and communication
    • Developing a user-centered approach

    Get stakeholders on board with Agile requirements

    1. Stakeholder feedback and management support are key components of a successful Agile Requirements.
    2. Stakeholders can see a project's progression and provide critical feedback about its success at critical milestones.
    3. Management helps teams succeed by trusting them to complete projects with business value at top of mind and by removing impediments that are inhibiting their productivity.
    4. Agile will bring a new mindset and significant numbers of people, process, and technology changes that stakeholders and management may not be accustomed to. Working through these issues in requirements management enables a smoother rollout.
    5. Management will play a key role in ensuring long-term Agile requirements success and ultimately rolling it out to the rest of the organization.
    6. The value of leadership involvement has not changed even though responsibilities will. The day-to-day involvement in projects will change but continual feedback will ultimately dictate the success or failure of a project.

    Measuring your success

    Tracking metrics and measuring your progress

    As you implement the actions from this Blueprint, you should see measurable improvements in;

    • Team and stakeholder satisfaction
    • Requirements quality
    • Documentation cost

    Without sacrificing time to delivery

    Metric Description and motivation
    Team satisfaction (%) Expect team satisfaction to increase as a result of clearer role delineation and value contribution.
    Stakeholder satisfaction (%) Expect Stakeholder satisfaction to similarly increase, as requirements quality increases, bringing increased value
    Requirements rework Measures the quality of requirements from your Agile Projects. Expect that the Requirements Rework will decrease, in terms of volume/frequency.
    Cost of documentation Quantifies the cost of documentation, including Elicitation, Analysis, Validation, Presentation, and Management
    Time to delivery Balancing Metric. We don't want improvements in other at the expense of time to delivery

    Info-Tech's methodology for Agile requirements

    1. Framing Agile and Business Analysis

    2. Tailoring Your Approach

    3. Defining Your Requirements Thresholds

    4. Planning Your Next Steps

    Phase Activities

    1.1 Understand the benefits and limitations of Agile and business analysis

    1.2 Align Agile and business analysis within your organization

    2.1 Decide the best-fit approach for delivery

    2.2 Manage your requirements backlog

    3.1 Define project roles and responsibilities

    3.2 Define your level of acceptable documentation

    3.3 Manage requirements as an asset

    3.4 Define your requirements change management plan

    4.1 Preparing new ways of working

    4.2 Develop a roadmap for next steps

    Phase Outcomes

    Recognize the benefits and detriments of both Agile and BA.

    Understand the current state of Agile and business analysis in your organization.

    Confirm the appropriate delivery methodology.

    Manage your requirements backlog.

    Connect the business need to user story.

    Clearly defined interactions between the BA and their partners.

    Define a plan for management and governance at the project team level.

    Documentation and tactics that are right-sized for the need.

    Recognize and prepare for the new ways of working for communication, stakeholder engagement, within the team, and across the organization.

    Establish a roadmap for next steps to mature your Agile requirements practice.

    Blueprint tools and templates

    Key deliverable:

    This is a screenshot from the Agile Requirements Playbook

    Agile Requirements Playbook

    A practical playbook for aligning your teams and articulating the guidelines for managing your requirements in Agile

    Each step of this blueprint is accompanied by supporting deliverables to help you accomplish your goals:

    This is a screenshot from the Documentation Calculator

    Documentation Calculator

    A tool to help you answer the question: What is the right level of Agile requirements documentation for my organization?

    This is a screenshot from the Agile Requirements Assessment

    Agile Requirements Assessment

    Establishes your current maturity level, defines your target state, and supports planning to get there.

    This is a screenshot from the Agile Requirements Workbook

    Agile Requirements Workbook

    Supporting tools and templates in advancing your Agile requirements practice, to be used with the Agile Requirements Blueprint and Playbook.

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    "Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful."

    Guided Implementation

    "Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track."

    Workshop

    "We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place."

    Consulting

    "Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project."

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

    Workshop Overview

    Contact your account representative for more information.
    workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8889

    Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5
    1. Framing Agile and Business Analysis / 2. Tailoring Your Approach 3. Defining Your Requirements
    Thresholds
    3. Defining Your Requirements Thresholds / 4. Planning Your Next Steps (OPTIONAL) Agile Requirements Techniques (a la carte) Next Steps and Wrap-Up (Offsite)

    Activities

    What does Agile mean in your organization? What do requirements mean in your organization?

    Agile Requirements Assessment

    Confirm your selected methodology

    Define your Agile requirements process

    Define your Agile requirements RACI (Optional)

    Define your Agile requirements governance

    Defining your change management plan

    Define your

    communication plan

    Capability gap list

    Planning your Agile requirements roadmap

    Managing requirements traceability

    Creating and managing user stories

    Managing your requirements backlog

    Maintaining a requirements library

    Develop Agile Requirements Playbook

    Complete in-progress deliverables from previous four days.

    Set up review time for workshop deliverables and next steps

    Outcomes

    Shared definition of Agile and business analysis / requirements

    Understand the current state of Agile and business analysis in your organization

    Agile requirements process

    Agile requirements RACI (Optional)

    Defined Agile requirements governance and documentation plan

    Change and backlog refinement plan

    Stakeholder communication plan

    Action plan and roadmap for maturing your Agile requirements practice

    Practical knowledge and practice about various tactics and techniques in support of your Agile requirements efforts

    Completed Agile Requirements Playbook

    Guided Implementation

    Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4

    Call #1: Scope objectives, and your specific challenges.

    Call #4: Define your approach to project delivery.

    Call #6: Define your Agile requirements process.

    Call #9: Identify gaps from current to target state maturity.

    Call #2: Assess current maturity.

    Call #5: Managing your requirements backlog.

    Call #7: Define roles and responsibilities.

    Call #10: Pprioritize next steps to mature your Agile requirements practice.

    Call #3: Identify target-state capabilities.

    Call #8: Define your change and backlog refinement approach.

    A Guided Implementation (GI) is a series of calls with an Info-Tech analyst to help implement our best practices in your organization.

    A typical GI is 10 calls over the course of 4 to 6 months.

    Framing Agile and Business Analysis

    Phase 1

    Framing Agile and Business Analysis

    Phase 1Phase 2Phase 3Phase 4

    1.1 Understand the benefits and limitations of Agile and business analysis

    1.2 Align Agile and business analysis within your organization

    2.1 Confirm the best-fit approach for delivery

    2.2 manage your requirements backlog

    3.1 Define project roles and responsibilities

    3.2 define your level of acceptable documentation

    3.3 Manage requirements as an asset

    3.4 Define your requirements change management plan

    4.1 Preparing new ways of working

    4.2 Develop a roadmap for next steps

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • EXERCISE: What do Agile and requirements mean in your organization?
    • ASSESSMENT: Agile requirements assessment
    • KEY DELIVERABLE: Agile Requirements Playbook

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • Business analyst and project team
    • Stakeholders
    • Sponsor/Executive

    Managing Requirements in an Agile Environment

    Step 1.1

    Understand the benefits and limitations of Agile and business analysis

    Activities

    1.1.1 Define what Agile and business analysis mean in your organization

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Business analyst and project team
    • Sponsor/Executive

    Outcomes of this step

    • Recognize the benefits and detriments of both Agile and business analysis

    Framing Agile and Business Analysis

    There have been many challenges with waterfall delivery

    It turns out waterfall is not that great at reducing risk and ensuring value delivery after all

    • Lack of flexibility
    • Difficulty in measuring progress
    • Difficulties with scope creep
    • Limited stakeholder involvement
    • Long feedback loops

    48%
    Had project deadlines more than double

    85%
    Exceeded their original budget by at least 20%

    25%
    At least doubled their original budget

    This is an image of the Waterfall Project Results

    Source: PPM Express.

    Business analysis had a clear home in waterfall

    Business analysts had historically been aligned to specific lines of business, in support of their partners in their respective domains. Somewhere along the way, the function was moved to IT. Conceptually this made sense, in that it allowed BAs to provide technical solutions to complex business problems. This had the unintended result of lost domain knowledge, and connection to the business.

    It all starts with the business. IT enables business goals. The closer you can get to the business, the better.

    Business analysts were the main drivers of helping to define the business requirements, or needs, and then decompose those into solution requirements, to develop the best option to solve those problems, or address those needs. And the case for good analysis was clear. The later a poor requirement was caught, the more expensive it was to fix. And if requirements were poor, there was no way to know until much later in the project lifecycle, when the cost to correct them was exponentially higher, to the tune of 10-100x the initial cost.

    This is an image of a graph showing the cost multiplier for Formulating Requirements, Architecture Design, Development, Testing and, Operations

    Adapted from PPM Express. "Why Projects Fail: Business Analysis is the Key".

    Agile was meant to address the shortcomings of waterfall

    The wait for solutions was too long for our business partners. The idea of investing significant time, money, and resources upfront, building an exhaustive and complete vision of the desired state, and then waiting months or even years to get that solution became unpalatable for them. And rightfully so. Once we cast a light on the pains, it became difficult to stand pat in the current state. And besides, organizations evolve at a rapid pace. What was a pain at the beginning of an initiative may not be so even six months later.

    Agile became the answer.

    Since its first appearance nearly 20 years ago, Agile has become the methodology of choice for a huge swathe of organizations. According to the 15th Annual State of Agile report, Agile adoption within software development teams increased from 37% in 2020 to 86% in 2021.

    To say that's significant is an understatement.

    The four core values of Agile helped shift focus

    According to the Agile manifesto, "We value. . ."

    This is an image of what is valued according to the Agile Manifesto.

    "…while there is value in the items on the right, we value the items on the left more."

    Source: Agilemanifesto, 2001

    Agile has made significant inroads in IT and beyond

    94% of respondents report using Agile practices in their organization

    according to Digital.AI's "The 15th State of Agile Report"

    That same report notes a steady expansion of Agile outside of IT, as other areas of the organization seek to benefit from increased agility and responsiveness, including Human Resources, Finance and Marketing.

    While it addressed some problems…

    This is an image of the Waterfall Project Results, compared to Agile Product Results.

    "Agile projects are 37% faster to market than [the] industry average"

    (Requirements Engineering Magazine, 2017)

    • Business requirements documents are massive and unreadable
    • Waterfall erects barriers and bottlenecks between the business and the development team
    • It's hard to define the solution at the outset of a project
    • There's a long turnaround between requirements work and solution delivery
    • Locking in requirements dictates an often-inflexible solution. And the costs to make changes tend to add up.

    …Implementing Agile led to other challenges

    This is an image of a series of thought bubbles, each containing a unique challenge resulting from implementing Agile.

    Adopting Agile led to challenges with requirements

    Requirements analysis, design maturity, and management are critical for a successful Agile transformation.

    "One of the largest sources of failure we have seen on large projects is an immature Agile implementation in the context of poorly defined requirements."
    – BCG, 2015

    "Requirements maturity is more important to project outcomes than methodology."
    – IAG Consulting, 2009.

    "Mature Agile practices spend 28% of their time on analysis and design."
    – InfoQ, 2017."

    "There exists a Requirements Premium… organizations using poor practices spent 62% more on similarly sized projects than organizations using the best requirements practices."
    – Requirements Engineering Magazine, 2017

    Strong stakeholder satisfaction with requirements results in higher satisfaction in other areas

    This is an image of a bar graph comparing the percentage of respondents with high stakeholder satisfaction, to the percentage of respondents with low stakeholder satisfaction for four different categories.  these include: Availability of IT Capacity to Complete Projects; Overall IT Projects; IT Projects Meet Business Needs; Overall IT Satisfaction

    N= 324 small organizations from Info-Tech Research Group's CIO Business Vision diagnostic.

    Note: High satisfaction was classified as organizations with a score greater or equal to eight and low satisfaction was every organization that scored below eight on the same questions.

    Agile is being misinterpreted as an opportunity to bypass planning and analysis activities

    Agile is a highly effective tool.

    This isn't about discarding Agile. It is being used for things completely outside of what was originally intended. When developing products or code, it is in its element. However, outside of that realm, its being used to bypass business analysis activities, which help define the true customer and business need.

    Business analysts were forced to adapt and shift focus. Overnight they morphed into product owners, or no longer had a place on the team. Requirements and analysis took a backseat.

    The result?

    Increased rework, decreased stakeholder satisfaction, and a lot of wasted money and effort.

    "Too often, the process of two-week sprints becomes the thing, and the team never gets the time and space to step back and obsess over what is truly needed to delight customers."
    Harvard Business Review, 9 April 2021.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Requirements in Agile are the same, but the purpose of requirements changes.

    • The purpose of requirements in waterfall is for stakeholder approval.
    • The purpose of requirements in Agile is knowledge management; to maintain a record of the current state.

    Many have misinterpreted the spirit of Agile and waterfall

    The stated principles of waterfall say nothing of how work is to be linear.

    This is an image of a comparison between using Agile and Being Prescriptive.This is an image of Royce's 5 principles for success.

    Source: Royce, Dr. Winston W., 1970.

    For more on Agile methodology, check out Info-Tech's Agile Research Centre

    How did the pendulum swing so far?

    Shorter cycles of work made requirements management more difficult. But the answer isn't to stop doing it.

    Organizations went from engaging business stakeholders up front, and then not until solution delivery, to forcing those partners to give up their resources to the project. From taking years to deliver a massive solution (which may or may not even still fit the need) to delivering in rapid cycles called sprints.

    This tug-of-war is costing organizations significant time, money, and effort.

    Your approach to requirements management needs to be centered. We can start to make that shift by better aligning our Agile and business analysis practices. Outside of the product space, Agile needs to be combined with other disciplines (Harvard Business Review, 2021) to be effective.

    Agility is important. Though it is not a replacement for approach or strategy (RCG Global Services, 2022). In Agile, team constraints are leveraged because of time. There is a failure to develop new capabilities to address the business needs Harvard Business Review, 2021).

    Agility needs analysis.

    Agile requirements are a balancing act

    Collaboration

    Many subject matter experts are necessary to create accurate requirements, but their time is limited too.

    Communication

    Stakeholders should be kept informed throughout the requirements gathering process, but you need to get the right information to the right people.

    Documentation

    Recording, organizing, and presenting requirements are essential, but excessive documentation will slow time to delivery.

    Control

    Establishing control points in your requirements gathering process can help confirm, verify, and approve requirements accurately, but stage gates limit delivery.

    Start by defining what the terms mean in your organization

    We do this because there isn't even agreement by the experts on what the terms "Agile" and "business analysis" mean, so let's establish a definition within the context of your organization.

    1.1.1 What do Agile and business analysis mean in your organization?

    Estimated time: 30 Minutes

    1. Explore the motivations behind the need for aligning Agile with business analysis. Are there any current challenges related to outputs, outcomes, quality? How can the team and organization align the two more effectively for the purposes of requirements management?
    2. Gather the appropriate stakeholders to discuss their definition of the terms "Agile" and "business analysis" It can be related to their experience, practice, or things they've read or heard.
    3. Brainstorm and document all shared thoughts and perspectives.
    4. Synthesize those thoughts and perspectives into a shared definition of each term, of a sentence or two.
    5. Revisit this definition as needed, and as your Agile requirements efforts evolve.

    Input

    • Challenges and experiences/perspectives related to Agile and business requirements

    Output

    • A shared definition of Agile and business analysis, to help guide alignment on Agile requirements management

    Materials

    • Agile Requirements Workbook

    Participants

    • Business Analyst(s)
    • Project Team
    • Sponsor/Executive
    • Relevant Stakeholders

    Build your Agile Requirements Playbook

    Keep the outcomes of this blueprint in a single document

    Share at the beginning of a new project, as part of team member onboarding, and revisit as your practice matures.

    This is a series of three screenshots from the Agile Requirements Playbook.

    Your Agile Requirements Playbook will include

    • Your shared definition of Agile and business analysis for your organization
    • The Agile Requirements Maturity Assessment
    • A Methodology Selection Matrix
    • Agile requirements RACI
    • A defined Agile requirements process
    • Documentation Calculator
    • Your Requirements Repository Information
    • Capability Gap List (from current to target state)
    • Target State Improvement Roadmap and Action Plan

    Step 1.2

    Align Agile and Business Analysis Within Your Organization

    Activities

    1.2.1 Assess your Agile requirements maturity

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Business Analyst and Project Team
    • Stakeholders
    • Sponsor/Executive

    Outcomes of this step

    • Complete the Agile Requirements Maturity Assessment to establish your current and target states

    Framing Agile and Business Analysis

    Consider the question: "Why Agile?"

    What is the driving force behind that decision?

    There are many reasons to leverage the power of Agile within your organization, and specifically as part of your requirements management efforts. And it shouldn't just be to improve productivity. That's only one aspect.
    Begin by asking, "Why Agile?" Are you looking to improve:

    • Time to market
    • Team engagement
    • Product quality
    • Customer satisfaction
    • Stakeholder engagement
    • Employee satisfaction
    • Consistency in delivery of value
    • Predictably of your releases

    Or a combination of the above?

    Info-Tech Insight

    Project delivery methodologies aren't either/or. You don't have to be 100% waterfall or 100% Agile. Select the right approach for your project, product, or service.

    In the end, your business partners don't want projects delivered faster, they want value faster!

    For more on understanding Agile, check out the Implement Agile Practices That Work Blueprint

    Responses to a 2019 KPMG survey:

    13% said that their top management fully supports Agile transformation.

    76% of organizations did not agree that their organization supports Agile culture.

    62% of top management believe Agile has no implications for them.

    What changes for the business analyst?

    Business analysts need to focus on six key elements when managing requirements in Agile.

    • Team formation and interaction
    • Stakeholder engagement and communication
    • The timing and sequencing of their work
    • Decision-making
    • Documentation
    • Dealing with change

    In Agile, the what of business analysis does not change.

    What does change is the how and when that work happens.

    1.2.1 Assess your Agile requirements maturity

    This is a series of screenshots from the Agile Requirements Maturity Assessment.

    1.2.1 Assess your Agile requirements maturity

    Estimated time: 30 Minutes

      1. Using the Agile Requirements Maturity Assessment, gather all appropriate stakeholders, and discuss and score the current state of your practice. Scoring can be done by:
        1. Consensus: Generally better with a smaller group, where the group agrees the score and documents the result
        2. Average: Have everyone score individually, and aggregate the results into an average, which is then entered.
        3. Weighted Average: As above, but weight the individual scores by individual or line of business to get a weighted average.
      2. When current state is complete, revisit to establish target state (or hold as a separate session) using the same scoring approach as in current state.
        1. Recognize that there is a cost to maturity, so don't default to the highest score by default.
        2. Resist the urge at this early stage to generate ideas to navigate from current to target state. We will re-visit this exercise in Phase 4, once we've defined other pieces of our process and practice.

    Input

    • Participant knowledge and experience

    Output

    • A current and target state assessment of your Agile requirements practice

    Materials

    • Agile Requirements Maturity Assessment

    Participants

    • Business Analyst(s)
    • Project Team
    • Sponsor/Executive
    • Relevant Stakeholders

    Tailoring Your Approach

    Phase 2

    Phase 1Phase 2Phase 3Phase 4

    1.1 Understand the benefits and limitations of Agile and business analysis

    1.2 Align Agile and business analysis within your organization

    2.1 Confirm the best-fit approach for delivery

    2.2 manage your requirements backlog

    3.1 Define project roles and responsibilities

    3.2 define your level of acceptable documentation

    3.3 Manage requirements as an asset

    3.4 Define your requirements change management plan

    4.1 Preparing new ways of working

    4.2 Develop a roadmap for next steps

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Selecting the appropriate delivery methodology
    • Managing your requirements backlog
    • Tracing from business need to user story

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • Business Analyst(s)
    • Project Team
    • Sponsor/Executive
    • Relevant Stakeholders

    Managing Requirements in an Agile Environment

    Step 2.1

    Confirm the Best-fit Approach for Delivery

    Activities

    2.1.1 Confirm your methodology

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Business Analyst(s)
    • Project Team
    • Sponsor/Executive
    • Relevant Stakeholders

    Outcomes of this step

    • A review of potential delivery methodologies to select the appropriate, best-fit approach to your projects

    Confirming you're using the best approach doesn't have be tricky

    Selecting the right approach (or confirming you're on the right track) is easier when you assess two key inputs to your project; your level of certainty about the solution, and the level of complexity among the different variables and inputs to your project, such as team experience and training, the number of impacted stakeholders or context. lines of business, and the organizational

    Solution certainty refers to the level of understanding of the problem and the solution at the start of the project. In projects with high solution certainty, the requirements and solutions are well defined, and the project scope is clear. In contrast, projects with low solution certainty have vague or changing requirements, and the solutions are not well understood.

    Project complexity refers to the level of complexity of the project, including the number of stakeholders, the number of deliverables, and the level of technical complexity. In projects with high complexity, there are many stakeholders with different priorities, many deliverables, and high technical complexity. In contrast, projects with low complexity have fewer stakeholders, fewer deliverables, and lower technical complexity.

    "Agile is a fantastic approach when you have no clue how you're going to solve a problem"

    • Ryan Folster, Consulting Services Manager, Business Analysis, Dimension Data

    Use Info-Tech's methodology selection matrix

    Waterfall methodology is best suited for projects with high solution certainty and high complexity. This is because the waterfall model follows a linear and sequential approach, where each phase of the project is completed before moving on to the next. This makes it ideal for projects where the requirements and solutions are well-defined, and the project scope is clear.

    On the other hand, Agile methodology is best suited for projects with low solution certainty. Agile follows an iterative and incremental approach, where the requirements and solutions are detailed and refined throughout the project. This makes it ideal for projects where the requirements and solutions are vague or changing.

    Note that there are other models that exist for determining which path to take, should this approach not fit within your organization.

    Use info-tech's-methodology-selection-matrix

    This is an image of Info-Tech’s methodology selection matrix

    Adapted from The Chaos Report, 2015 (The Standish Group)

    Download the Agile Requirements Workbook

    2.1.1 Confirm your methodology

    Estimated time: 30 Minutes

    1. Using the Agile Requirements Workbook, find the tab labelled "Methodology Assessment" and answer the questions to establish your complexity and certainty scores, where;

    1 = Strongly disagree
    2 = Disagree
    3 = Neutral
    4 = Agree
    5 = Strongly agree.

    1. In the same workbook, plot the results in the grid on the tab labelled "Methodology Matrix".
    2. Projects falling into Green are good fits for Agile. Yellow are viable. And Red may not be a great fit for Agile.
    3. Note: Ultimately, the choice of methodology is yours. Recognize there may be additional challenges when a project is too complex, or uncertainty is high.

    Input

    • Current project complexity and solution certainty

    Output

    • A clear choice of delivery methodology

    Materials

    • Agile Requirements Workbook

    Participants

    • Business Analyst(s)
    • Project Team
    • Sponsor/Executive
    • Relevant Stakeholders

    Step 2.2

    Manage Your Requirements Backlog

    Activities

    2.2.1 Create your user stories

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Business Analyst(s)
    • Project Team
    • Sponsor/Executive
    • Relevant Stakeholders

    Outcomes of this step

    • Understand how to convert requirements into user stories, which populate the Requirements Backlog.

    Tailoring Your Approach

    There is a hierarchy to requirements

    This is a pyramid, with the base being: Solution Requirements; The middle being: Stakeholder Requirements; and the Apex being: Business Requirements.
    • Higher-level statements of the goals, objectives, or needs of the enterprise.
    • Business requirements focus on the needs of the organization, and not the stakeholders within it.

    Defines

    Intended benefits and outcomes

    • Statements of the needs of a particular stakeholder or class of stakeholders, and how that stakeholder will interact with a solution.

    Why it is needed, and by who

    • Describes the characteristics of a solution that meets business requirements and stakeholder requirements. Functional describes the behavior and information that the solution will manage. They describe capabilities the system will be able to perform in terms of behaviors or operations. Non-functional represents constraints on the ultimate solution and tends to be less negotiable.

    What is needed, and how its going to be achieved

    Connect the dots with a traceability matrix

    Business requirements describe what a company needs in order to achieve its goals and objectives. Solution requirements describe how those needs will be met. User stories are a way to express the functionality that a solution will provide from the perspective of an end user.

    A traceability matrix helps clearly connect and maintain your requirements.

    To connect business requirements to solution requirements, you can start by identifying the specific needs that the business has and then determining how those needs can be met through technology or other solutions; or what the solution needs to do to meet the business need. So, if the business requirement is to increase online sales, a solution requirement might include implementing a shopping cart feature on your company website.

    Once you have identified the solution requirements, you can then use those to create user stories. A user story describes a specific piece of functionality that the solution will provide from the perspective of a user.

    For example, "As a customer, I want to be able to add items to my shopping cart so that I can purchase them." This user story is directly tied to the solution requirement of implementing a shopping cart feature.

    Tracing from User Story back up to Business Requirement is essential in ensuring your solutions support your organization's strategic vison and objectives.

    This is an image of a traceability matrix for Business Requirements.

    Download the Info-Tech Requirements Traceability Matrix

    Improve the quality of your solution requirements

    A solution requirement is a statement that clearly outlines the functional capability that the business needs from a system or application.

    There are several attributes to look for in requirements:

    Verifiable

    Unambiguous

    Complete

    Consistent

    Achievable

    Traceable

    Unitary

    Agnostic

    Stated in a way that can be easily tested

    Free of subjective terms and can only be interpreted in one way

    Contains all relevant information

    Does not conflict with other requirements

    Possible to accomplish with budgetary and technological constraints

    Trackable from inception through to testing

    Addresses only one thing and cannot be decomposed into multiple requirements

    Doesn't pre-suppose a specific vendor or product

    For more on developing high quality requirements, check out the Improve Requirements Gathering Blueprint

    Prioritize your requirements

    When everything is a priority, nothing is a priority.

    Prioritization is the process of ranking each requirement based on its importance to project success. Each requirement should be assigned a priority level. The delivery team will use these priority levels to ensure efforts are targeted toward the proper requirements as well as to plan features available on each release. Use the MoSCoW Model of Prioritization to effectively order your requirements.

    The MoSCoW Model of Prioritization

    This is an image of The MoSCoW Model of Prioritization

    The MoSCoW model was introduced by Dai Clegg of Oracle UK in 1994

    (Source: ProductPlan).

    Base your prioritization on the right set of criteria

    Criteria Description
    Regulatory and legal compliance These requirements will be considered mandatory.
    Policy compliance Unless an internal policy can be altered or an exception can be made, these requirements will be considered mandatory.
    Business value significance Give a higher priority to high-value requirements.
    Business risk Any requirement with the potential to jeopardize the entire project should be given a high priority and implemented early.
    Likelihood of success Especially in proof-of-concept projects, it is recommended that requirements have good odds.
    Implementation complexity Give a higher priority to low implementation difficulty requirements.
    Alignment with strategy Give a higher priority to requirements that enable the corporate strategy.
    Urgency Prioritize requirements based on time sensitivity.
    Dependencies A requirement on its own may be low priority, but if it supports a high-priority requirement, then its priority must match it.

    Info-Tech Insight

    It is easier to prioritize requirements if they have already been collapsed, resolved, and rewritten. There is no point in prioritizing every requirement that is elicited up front when some of them will eventually be eliminated.

    Manage solution requirements in a Product backlog

    What is a backlog?

    Agile teams are familiar with the use of a Sprint Backlog, but in Requirements Management, a Product Backlog is a more appropriate choice.

    A product backlog and a Sprint backlog are similar in that they are both lists of items that need to be completed in order to deliver a product or project, but there are some key differences between the two.

    A product backlog is a list of all the features, user stories, and requirements that are needed for a product or project. It is typically created and maintained by the business analyst or product owner and is used to prioritize and guide the development of the product.

    A Sprint backlog, on the other hand, is a list of items specifically for an upcoming sprint, which is an iteration of work in Scrum. The Sprint backlog is created by the development team and is used to plan and guide the work that will be done during the sprint. The items in the Sprint backlog are typically taken from the product backlog and are prioritized based on their importance and readiness.

    For more on building effective product backlogs, visit Deliver on Your Digital Product Vision

    A backlog stores and organizes requirements at various stages

    Your backlog must give you a holistic understanding of demand for change in the product.

    A well-formed backlog can be thought of as a DEEP backlog

    Detailed appropriately: Requirements are broken down and refined as necessary

    Emergent: The backlog grows and evolves over time as requirements are added and removed.

    Estimated: The effort to deliver a requirement is estimated at each tier.

    Prioritized: A requirement's value and priority are determined at each tier.

    This is an image of an inverted funnel, with the top being labeled: Ideas; The middle being labeled: Qualified; and the bottom being labeled: Ready.

    Adapted from Essential Scrum

    Ensure requests and requirements are ready for development

    Clearly define what it means for a requirement, change, or maintenance request to be ready for development.

    This will help ensure the value and scope of each functionality and change are clear and well understood by both developers and stakeholders before the start of the sprint. The definition of ready should be two-fold: ready for the backlog, and ready for coding.

    1. Create a checklist that indicates when a requirement or request is ready for the development backlog. Consider the following questions:
      1. Is the requirement or request in the correct format?
      2. Does the desired functionality or change have significant business value?
      3. Can the requirement or request be reasonably completed within defined release timelines under the current context?
      4. Does the development team agree with the budget and points estimates?
      5. Is there an understanding of what the requirement or request means from the stakeholder or user perspective?
    2. Create a checklist that indicates when a requirement or request is ready for development. Consider the following questions:
      1. Have the requirements and requests been prioritized in the backlog?
      2. Has the team sufficiently collaborated on how the desired functionality or change can be completed?
      3. Do the tasks in each requirement or request contain sufficient detail and direction to begin development?
      4. Can the requirement or request be broken down into smaller pieces?

    Converting solution requirements into user stories

    Define the user

    Who will be interacting with the product or feature being developed? This will help to focus the user story on the user's needs and goals.

    Create the story

    Create the user story using the following template: "As a [user], I want [feature] so that [benefit]."
    This helps articulate the user's need and the value that the requirement will provide.

    Decompose

    User stories are typically too large to be implemented in a single sprint, so they should be broken down into smaller, more manageable tasks.

    Prioritize

    User stories are typically too large to be implemented in a single sprint, so they should be broken down into smaller, more manageable tasks.

    2.2.1 Create your user stories

    Estimated time: 60 Minutes

    1. Gather the project team and relevant stakeholders. Have access to your current list of solution requirements.
    2. Leverage the approach on previous slide "Converting Solution Requirements into User Stories" to generate a collection of user stories.

    NOTE: There is not a 1:1 relationship between requirements and user stories.
    It is possible that a single requirement will have multiple user stories, and similarly, that a single user story will apply to multiple solution requirements.

    Input

    • Requirements
    • Use Case Template

    Output

    • A collection of user stories

    Materials

    • Current Requirements

    Participants

    • Business Analyst(s)
    • Project Team
    • Relevant Stakeholders

    Use the INVEST model to create good user stories

    At this point your requirements should be high-level stories. The goal is to refine your backlog items, so they are . . .

    A vertical image of the Acronym: INVEST, taken from the first letter of each bolded word in the column to the right of the image.

    Independent: Ideally your user stories can be built in any order (i.e. independent from each other). This allows you to prioritize based on value and not get caught up in sequencing and prerequisites.
    Negotiable: As per the Agile principle, collaboration over contracts. Your user stories are meant to facilitate collaboration between the developer and the business. Therefore, they should be built to allow negotiation between all parties.
    Valuable: A user story needs to state the value so it can be effectively prioritized, but also so developers know what they are building.
    Estimable: As opposed to higher-level approximation given to epics, user stories need more accuracy in their estimates in order to, again, be effectively prioritized, but also so teams can know what can fit into a sprint or release plans.
    Small: User stories should be small enough for a number of them to fit into a sprint. However, team size and velocity will impact how many can be completed. A general guideline is that your teams should be able to deliver multiple stories in a sprint.
    Testable: Your stories need to be testable, which means they must have defined acceptance criteria and any related test cases as defined in your product quality standards.
    Source: Agile For All

    Defining Your Requirements Thresholds

    Phase 3

    Defining Your Requirements Thresholds

    Phase 1Phase 2Phase 3Phase 4

    1.1 Understand the benefits and limitations of Agile and business analysis

    1.2 Align Agile and business analysis within your organization

    2.1 Confirm the best-fit approach for delivery

    2.2 manage your requirements backlog

    3.1 Define project roles and responsibilities

    3.2 define your level of acceptable documentation

    3.3 Manage requirements as an asset

    3.4 Define your requirements change management plan

    4.1 Preparing new ways of working

    4.2 Develop a roadmap for next steps

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Assigning roles and responsibilities optional (Tool: RACI)
    • Define your Agile requirements process
    • Calculate the cost of your documentation (Tool: Documentation Calculator)
    • Define your backlog refinement plan

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • Business Analyst(s)
    • Project Team
    • Sponsor/Executive
    • Relevant Stakeholders

    Managing Requirements in an Agile Environment

    Step 3.1

    Define Project Roles and Responsibilities

    Activities

    3.1.1 Define your Agile requirements RACI (optional)

    3.1.2 Define your Agile requirements process

    Defining Your Requirements Thresholds

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Business Analyst(s)
    • Project Team
    • Sponsor/Executive
    • Relevant Stakeholders

    Outcomes of this step

    • A defined register of roles and responsibilities, along with a defined process for how Agile requirements work is to be done.

    Defining Your Requirements Thresholds

    Where does the BA function fit on an Agile team?

    Team formation is key, as Agile is a team sport

    A business analyst in an Agile team typically interacts with several different roles, including the product owner, development team, and many other stakeholders throughout the organization.

    This is an image the roles who typically interact with a Business Analyst.

    • The product owner, to set the priorities and direction of the project, and to gather requirements and ensure they are being met. Often, but not always, the BA and product owner are the same individual.
    • The development team, to provide clear and concise requirements that they can use to build and test the product.
    • Other stakeholders, such as customers, end-users, and subject matter experts to gather their requirements, feedback and validate the solution.
      • Design, to ensure that the product meets user needs. They may provide feedback and ensure that the design is aligned with requirements.
      • Security, to ensure that the solution meets all necessary security requirements and to identify potential risks and appropriate use of controls.
      • Testing, to ensure that the solution is thoroughly tested before it is deployed. They may create test cases or user scenarios that validate that everything is working as intended.
      • Deployment, to ensure that the necessary preparations have been made, including testing, security, and user acceptance.

    Additionally, during the sprint retrospectives, the team will review their performance and find ways to improve for the next sprint. As a team member, the business analyst helps to identify areas where the team could improve how they are working with requirements and understand how the team can improve communication with stakeholders.

    3.1.1 (Optional) Define Your Agile Requirements RACI

    Estimated Time: 60 Minutes

    1. Identify the project deliverables: The first step is to understand the project deliverables and the tasks that are required to complete them. This will help you to identify the different roles and responsibilities that need to be assigned.
    2. Define the roles and responsibilities: Identify the different roles that will be involved in the project and their associated responsibilities. These roles may include project manager, product owner, development team, stakeholders, and any other relevant parties.
    3. Assign RACI roles: Assign a RACI role to each of the identified tasks. The RACI roles are:
      1. Responsible: the person or team who is responsible for completing the task
      2. Accountable: the person who is accountable for the task being completed on time and to the required standard
      3. Consulted: the people or teams who need to be consulted to ensure the task is completed successfully
      4. Informed: the people or teams who need to be informed of the task's progress and outcome
    4. Create the RACI chart: Use the information gathered in the previous steps to create a matrix or chart that shows the tasks, the roles, and the RACI roles assigned to each task.
    5. Review and refine: Review the RACI chart with the project team and stakeholders to ensure that it accurately reflects the roles and responsibilities of everyone involved. Make any necessary revisions and ensure that all parties understand their roles and responsibilities.
    6. Communicate and implement: Communicate the RACI chart to all relevant parties and ensure that it is used as a reference throughout the project. This will help to ensure that everyone understands their role and that tasks are completed on time and to the required standard.

    Input

    • A list of required tasks and activities
    • A list of stakeholders

    Output

    • A list of defined roles and responsibilities for your project

    Materials

    • Agile Requirements Workbook

    Participants

    • Business Analyst(s)
    • Project Team
    • Sponsor/Executive
    • Relevant Stakeholders

    A Case Study in Team Formation

    Industry: Anonymous Organization in the Energy sector
    Source: Interview

    Challenge

    Agile teams were struggling to deliver within a defined sprint, as there were consistent delays in requirements meeting the definition of ready for development. As such, sprints were often delayed, or key requirements were descoped and deferred to a future sprint.

    During a given two-week sprint cycle, the business analyst assigned to the team would be working along multiple horizons, completing elicitation, analysis, and validation, while concurrently supporting the sprint and dealing with stakeholder changes.

    Solution

    As a part of addressing this ongoing pain, a pilot program was run to add a second business analyst to the team.

    The intent was, as one is engaged preparing requirements through elicitation, analysis, and validation for a future sprint, the second is supporting the current sprint cycle, and gaining insights from stakeholders to refine the requirements backlog.

    Essentially, these two were leap-frogging each other in time. At all times, one BA was focused on the present, and one on the future.

    Result

    A happier team, more satisfied stakeholders, and consistent delivery of features and functions by the Agile teams. The pilot team outperformed all other Agile teams in the organization, and the "2 BA" approach was made the new standard.

    Understanding the Agile requirements process

    Shorter cycles make effective requirements management more necessary, not less

    Short development cycles can make requirements management more difficult because they often result in a higher rate of change to the requirements. In a shorter timeframe, there is less time to gather and verify requirements, leading to a higher likelihood of poor or incomplete requirements. Additionally, there may be more pressure to make decisions quickly, which can lead to less thorough analysis and validation of requirements. This can make it more challenging to ensure that the final solution meets the needs of the stakeholders.
    When planning your requirements cycles, it's important to consider;

    • Your sprint logistics (how long?)
    • Your release plan (at the end of every sprint, monthly, quarterly?)
    • How the backlog will be managed (as tickets, on a visual medium, such as a Kanban board?)
    • How will you manage communication?
    • How will you monitor progress?
    • How will future sprint planning happen?

    Info-Tech's Agile requirements framework

    Sprint N(-1)

    Sprint N

    Sprint N(+1)

    An image of Sprint N(-1) An image of Sprint N An image of Sprint N(+1)

    Changes from waterfall to Agile

    Gathering and documenting requirements: Requirements are discovered and refined throughout the project, rather than being gathered and documented up front. This can be difficult for business analysts who are used to working in a waterfall environment where all requirements are gathered and documented before development begins.
    Prioritization of requirements: Requirements are prioritized based on their value to the customer and the team's ability to deliver them. This can be difficult for business analysts who are used to prioritizing requirements based on the client's needs or their own understanding of what is important.

    Defining acceptance criteria: Acceptance criteria are defined for each user story to ensure that the team understands what needs to be delivered. Business analysts need to understand how to write effective acceptance criteria and how to use them to ensure that the team delivers what the customer needs.
    Supporting Testing and QA: The business analyst plays a role in ensuring that testing (and test cases) are completed and of proper quality, as defined in the requirements.

    Managing changing requirements: It is expected that requirements will change throughout the project. Business analysts need to be able to adapt quickly to changing requirements and ensure that the team is aware of the changes and how they will impact the project.
    Collaboration with stakeholders: Requirements are gathered from a variety of stakeholders, including customers, users, and team members. Business analysts need to be able to work effectively with all stakeholders to gather and refine requirements and ensure that the team is building the right product.

    3.1.2 Define your Agile requirements process

    Estimated time: 60 Minutes

    1. Gather all relevant stakeholders to discuss and define your process for requirements management.
    2. Have a team member facilitate the session to define the process. The sample in the Agile Requirements Workbook can be used optionally as a starting point. You can also use any existing processes and procedures as a baseline.
    3. Gain agreement on the process from all involved stakeholders.
    4. Revisit the process periodically to review its performance and make adjustments as needed.

    NOTE: The process is intended to be at a high enough level to leave space and flexibility for team members to adapt and adjust, but at a sufficient depth that everyone understands the process and workflows. In other words, the process will be both flexible and rigid, and the two are not mutually exclusive.

    Input

    • Project team and RACI
    • Existing Process (if available)

    Output

    • A process for Agile requirements that is flexible yet rigid

    Materials

    • Agile Requirements Workbook

    Participants

    • Business Analyst(s)
    • Project Team
    • Sponsor/Executive
    • Relevant Stakeholders

    Establish the right level of governance and decision-making

    Establishing the right level of governance and decision making is important in Agile requirements because there is a cost to decision making, as time plays an important factor. Even the failure to decide can have significant impacts.

    Good governance and decision-making practices can help to minimize risks, ensure that requirements are well understood and managed, and that project progress is tracked and reported effectively.

    In Agile environments, this often involves establishing clear roles and responsibilities, implementing effective communication and collaboration practices, and ensuring that decision-making processes are efficient and effective.

    Good requirements management practices can help to ensure that projects are aligned with organizational goals and strategy, that stakeholders' needs are understood and addressed, and that deliverables are of high quality and meet the needs of the business.

    By ensuring that governance and decision-making is effective, organizations can improve the chances of project success, and deliver value to the business. Risks and costs can be mitigated by staying small and nimble.

    Check out Make Your IT Governance Adaptable

    Develop an adaptive governance process

    A pyramid, with the number 4 at the apex, and the number 1 at the base.  In order from base-apex, the following titles are found to the right of the pyramid: Ad-Hoc governance; Controlled Governance; Agile Governance; Embedded/Automated governance.

    Maturing governance is a journey

    Organizations should look to progress in their governance stages. Ad-hoc and controlled governance tends to be slow, expensive, and a poor fit for modern practices.

    The goal as you progress through your stages is to delegate governance and empower teams to make optimal decisions in real-time, knowing that they are aligned with the understood best interests of the organization.

    Automate governance for optimal velocity, while mitigating risks and driving value.

    This puts your organization in the best position to be adaptive and able to react effectively to volatility and uncertainty.

    A graph charting Trust and empowerment on the x-axis, and Progress Integration on the Y axis.

    Five key principles for building an adaptive governance framework

    Delegate and empower

    Decision making must be delegated down within the organization, and all resources must be empowered and supported to make effective decisions.

    Define outcomes

    Outcomes and goals must be clearly articulated and understood across the organization to ensure decisions are in line and stay within reasonable boundaries.

    Make risk- informed decisions

    Integrated risk information must be available with sufficient data to support decision making and design approaches at all levels of the organization.

    Embed / automate

    Governance standards and activities need to be embedded in processes and practices. Optimal governance reduces its manual footprint while remaining viable. This also allows for more dynamic adaptation.

    Establish standards and behavior

    Standards and policies need to be defined as the foundation for embedding governance practices organizationally. These guardrails will create boundaries to reinforce delegated decision making.

    Sufficient decision-making power should be given to your Agile teams

    Push the decision-making process down to your pilot teams.

    • Bring your business stakeholders and subject matter experts together to identify the potential high-level risks.
    • Bring your business stakeholders and subject matter experts together to identify the potential high-level risks.
    • Discuss with the business the level of risk they are willing to accept.
    • Define the level of authority project teams have in making critical decisions.

    "Push the decision making down as far as possible, down to the point where sprint teams completely coordinate all the integration, development, and design. What I push up the management chain is risk taking. [Management] decides what level of risk they are willing to take and [they] demonstrate that by the amount of decision making you push down."
    – Senior Manager, Canadian P&C Insurance Company, Info-Tech Interview

    Step 3.2

    Define Your Level of Acceptable Documentation

    Activities

    3.2.1 Calculate the cost of documentation

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Business Analyst(s)
    • Project Team
    • Relevant Stakeholders

    Outcomes of this step

    • Quantified cost of documentation produced for your Agile project.

    Defining Your Requirements Thresholds

    Right-size Your Documentation

    Why do we need it, and what purpose does it serve?

    Before creating any documentation, consider why; why are you creating documentation, and what purpose is it expected to serve?
    Is it:

    • … to gain approval?
    • … to facilitate decision-making?
    • .. to allow the team to think through a challenge or compare solution options?

    Next, consider what level of documentation would be acceptable and 'enough' for your stakeholders. Recognize that 'enough' will depend on your stakeholder's personal definition and perspective.
    There may also be considerations for maintaining documentation for the purposes of compliance, and auditability in some contexts and industries.
    The point is not to eliminate all documentation, but rather, to question why we're producing it, so that we can create just enough to deliver value.

    "What does the next person need to do their work well, to gain or create a shared understanding?"
    - Filip Hendrickx, Innovating BA and Founder, altershape

    Documentation comes at a cost

    We need to quantify the cost of documentation, against the expected benefit

    All things take time, and that would imply that all things have an inherent cost. We often don't think in these terms, as it's just the work we do, and costs are only associated with activities requiring additional capital expenditure. Documentation of requirements can come at a cost in terms of time and resources. Creating and maintaining detailed documentation requires effort from project team members, which could be spent on other aspects of the project such as development or testing. Additionally, there may be costs associated with storing and distributing the documentation.

    When creating documentation, we are making a decision. There is an opportunity cost of investing time to create, and concurrently, not working on other activities. Documentation of requirements can come at a cost in terms of time and resources. Creating and maintaining detailed documentation requires effort from project team members, which could be spent on other aspects of the project such as development or testing. Additionally, there may be costs associated with storing and distributing the documentation.

    In order to make better informed decisions about the types, quantity and even quality of the documentation we are producing, we need to capture that data. To ensure we are receiving good value for our documentation, we should compare the expected costs to the expected benefits of a sprint or project.

    3.2.1 Calculate the cost of documentation

    Estimated time: as needed

    1. Use this tool to quantify the cost of creating and maintaining current state documentation for your Agile requirements team. It provides an indication, via the Documentation Cost Index, of when your project is documenting excessively, relative to the expected benefits of the sprint or project.
    2. In Step 1, enter the hourly rate for the person (or persons) completing the business analysis function for your Agile team. NB: This does not have to be a person with the title of business analyst. If there are multiple people fulfilling this role, enter the average rate (if their rates are same or similar) or a weighted average (if there is a significant range in the hourly rate)
    3. In Step 2, enter the expected benefit (in $) for the sprint or project.
    4. In Step 3, enter the total number of hours spent on each task/activity during the sprint or project. Use blank spaces as needed to add tasks and activities not listed.
    5. In Step 4, you'll find the Documentation Cost Index, which compares your total documentation cost to the expected benefits. The cell will show green when the value is < 0.8, yellow between 0.8 and 1, and red when >1.
    6. Use the information to plan future sprints and documentation needs, identify opportunities for improvement in your requirements practice, and find balance in "just enough" documentation.

    Input

    • Project team and RACI
    • Existing Process (if available)

    Output

    • A process for Agile requirements that is flexible yet rigid

    Materials

    • Agile Requirements Workbook

    Participants

    • Business Analyst(s)
    • Project Team
    • Sponsor/Executive
    • Relevant Stakeholders

    Lack of documentation also comes at a cost

    Lack of documentation can bring costs to Agile projects in a few different ways.

    • Onboarding new team members
    • Improving efficiency
    • Knowledge management
    • Auditing and compliance
    • Project visibility
    • Maintaining code

    Info-Tech Insight

    Re-using deliverables (documentation, process, product, etc.) is important in maintaining the velocity of work. If you find yourself constantly recreating your current state documentation at the start of a project, it's hard to deliver with agility.

    Step 3.3

    Manage Requirements as an Asset

    Activities

    3.3.1 Discuss your current perspectives on requirements as assets

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Business Analyst(s)
    • Project Team
    • Relevant Stakeholders

    Outcomes of this step

    • Awareness of the value in, and tactics for enabling effective management of requirements as assets

    Defining Your Requirements Thresholds

    What do we mean by "assets"?

    And when do requirements become assets?

    In order to delivery with agility, you need to maximize the re-usability of artifacts. These artifacts could take the form of current state documentation, user stories, test cases, and yes, even requirements for re-use.
    Think of it like a library for understanding where your organization is today. Understanding the people, processes, and technology, in one convenient location. These artifacts become assets when we choose to retain them, rather than discard them at the end of a project, when we think they'll no longer be needed.
    And just like finding a single book in a vast library, we need to ensure our assets can be found when we need them. And this means making them searchable.
    We can do this by establishing criteria for requirements and artifact reuse;

    • What business need and benefit is it aligned to?
    • What metadata needs to be attached, related to source, status, subject, author, permissions, type, etc.?
    • Where will it be stored for ease of retrieval?

    Info-Tech Insight

    When writing requirements for products or services, write them for the need first, and not simply for what is changing.

    The benefits of managing requirements as assets

    Retention of knowledge in a knowledge base that allows the team to retain current business requirements, process documentation, business rules, and any other relevant information.
    A clearly defined scope to reduce stakeholder, business, and compliance conflicts.
    Impact analysis of changes to the current organizational assets.

    Source: Requirement Engineering Magazine, 2017.

    A case study in creating an asset repository

    Industry: Anonymous Organization in the Government sector
    Source: Interview

    Challenge

    A large government organization faced a challenge with managing requirements, processes, and project artifacts with any consistency.

    Historically, their documentation was lacking, with multiple versions existing in email sent folders and manila folders no one could find. Confirming the current state at any given time meant the heavy lift of re-documenting and validating, so that effort was avoided for an excessive period.

    Then there was a request for audit and compliance, to review their existing documentation practices. With nothing concrete to show, drastic recommendations were made to ensure this practice would end.

    Solution

    A small but effective team was created to compile and (if not available) document all existing project and product documentation, including processes, requirements, artifacts, business cases, etc.

    A single repository was built and demonstrated to key stakeholders to ensure it would satisfy the needs of the audit and compliance group.

    Result

    A single source of truth for the organization, which was;

    • Accessible (view access to the entire organization).
    • Transparent (anyone could see and understand the process and requirements as intended).
    • A baseline for continuous improvement, as it was clear what the one defined "best way" was.
    • Current, where no one retained current documentation outside of this library.

    3.3.1 Discuss your current perspectives on requirements as assets

    Estimated time: 30 Minutes

    1. Gather all relevant stakeholder to share perspectives on the use of requirements as assets, historically in the organization.
    2. Have a team member facilitate the session. It is optional to document the findings.
    3. After looking at the historical use of requirements as assets, discuss the potential uses, benefits, and drawbacks of managing as assets in the target state.

    Input

    • Participant knowledge and experience

    Output

    • A shared perspective and history on requirements as assets

    Materials

    • A method for data capture (optional)

    Participants

    • Business Analyst(s)
    • Project Team
    • Sponsor/Executive
    • Relevant Stakeholders

    Apply changes to baseline documentation

    Baseline + Release Changes = New Baseline

    • Start from baseline documentation dramatically to reduce cost and risk
    • Treat all scope as changes to baseline requirements
    • Sum of changes in the release scope
    • Sum of changes and original baseline becomes the new baseline
    • May take additional time and effort to maintain accurate baseline

    What is the right tool?

    While an Excel spreadsheet is great to start off, its limitations will become apparent as your product delivery process becomes more complex. Look at these solutions to continue your journey in managing your Agile requirements:

    Step 3.4

    Define Your Requirements Change Management Plan

    Activities

    3.4.1 Triage your requirements

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Business Analyst(s)
    • Project Team
    • Relevant Stakeholders

    Outcomes of this step

    • An approach for determining the appropriate level of governance over changes to requirements.

    Expect and embrace change

    In Agile development, change is expected and embraced. Instead of trying to rigidly follow a plan that may become outdated, Agile teams focus on regularly reassessing their priorities and adapting their plans accordingly. This means that the requirements can change often, and it's important for the team to have a process in place for managing these changes.

    A common approach to managing change in Agile is to use a technique called "backlog refinement." Where previously we populated our backlog with requirements to get them ready for development and deployment, this involves regularly reviewing and updating the list of work to be done. The team will prioritize the items on the evolving backlog, and the prioritized items will be worked on during the next sprint. This allows the team to quickly respond to changes in requirements and stay focused on the most important work.

    Another key aspect of managing change in Agile is effective communication. The team should have regular meetings, such as daily stand-up meetings or weekly sprint planning meetings, to discuss any changes in requirements and ensure that everyone is on the same page.

    Best practices in change and backlog refinement

    Communicate

    Clearly communicate your change process, criteria, and any techniques, tools, and templates that are part of your approach.

    Understand impacts/risks

    Maintain consistent control and communication and ensure that an impact assessment is completed. This is key to managing risks.

    Leverage tools

    Leverage tools when you have them available. This could be a Requirements Management system, a defect/change log, or even by turning on "track changes" in your documents.

    Cross-reference

    For every change, define the source of the change, the reason for the change, key dates for decisions, and any supporting documentation.

    Communicate the reason, and stay on message throughout the change

    Leaders of successful change spend considerable time developing a powerful change message: a compelling narrative that articulates the desired end state and makes the change concrete and meaningful to staff. They create the change vision with staff to build ownership and commitment.

    • The change message should:
    • Explain why the change is needed.
    • Summarize the things that will stay the same.
    • Highlight the things that will be left behind.
    • Emphasize the things that are being changed.
    • Explain how the change will be implemented.
    • Address how the change will affect the various roles in the organization.
    • Discuss staff's role in making the change successful.

    The five elements of communicating the reason for the change:

    An image of a cycle, including the five elements for communicating the reason for change.  these include: What will the role be for each department and individual?; What is the change?; Why are we doing it?; How are we going to go about it?; How long will it take us?

    How to make the management of changes more effective

    Key decisions and considerations

    How will changes to requirements be codified?
    How will intake happen?

    • What is the submission process?
    • Who has approval to submit?
    • What information is needed to submit a request?

    How will potential changes be triaged and evaluated?

    • What criteria will be used to assess the impact and urgency of the potential change?
    • How will you treat material and non-material changes?

    What is the review and approval process?

    • How will acceptance or rejection status be communicated to the submitter?

    3.4.1 Triage Your requirements

    An image of an inverted triangle, with the top being labeled: No Material Impact, the middle being labeled: Material impact; and the bottom being labeled: Governance Impact.  To the right of the image, are text boxes elaborating on each heading.

    If there's no material impact, update and move on

    An image of an inverted triangle, with the top being labeled: No Material Impact, the middle being labeled: Material impact; and the bottom being labeled: Governance Impact. To the right of the image, is a cycle including the following terms: Validate change; Update requirements; Track change (log); Package and communicate

    Material changes require oversight and approval

    An image of an inverted triangle, with the top being labeled: No Material Impact, the middle being labeled: Material impact; and the bottom being labeled: Governance Impact. To the right of the image, is a cycle including the following terms: Define impact; Revise; Change control needed?; Implement change.

    Planning Your Next Steps

    Phase 4

    Planning Your Next Steps

    Phase 1Phase 2Phase 3Phase 4

    1.1 Understand the benefits and limitations of Agile and business analysis

    1.2 Align Agile and business analysis within your organization

    2.1 Confirm the best-fit approach for delivery

    2.2 manage your requirements backlog

    3.1 Define project roles and responsibilities

    3.2 define your level of acceptable documentation

    3.3 Manage requirements as an asset

    3.4 Define your requirements change management plan

    4.1 Preparing new ways of working

    4.2 Develop a roadmap for next steps

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Completing Your Agile Requirements Playbook
    • EXERCISE: Capability Gap List

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • Business Analyst(s)
    • Project Team
    • Sponsor/Executive
    • Relevant Stakeholders

    Managing Requirements in an Agile Environment

    Step 4.1

    Preparing New Ways of Working

    Activities

    4.1.1 Define your communication plan

    Planning Your Next Steps

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Business Analyst(s)
    • Project Team
    • Sponsor/Executive
    • Relevant Stakeholders

    Outcomes of this step

    • Recognize the changes required on the team and within the broader organization, to bring stakeholders on board.

    How we do requirements work will change

    • Team formation and interaction
    • Stakeholder engagement and communication
    • The timing and sequencing of their work
    • Decision-making
    • Documentation
    • Dealing with change

    As a result, you'll need to focus on;

    Emphasizing flexibility: In Agile organizations, there is a greater emphasis on flexibility and the ability to adapt to change. This means that requirements may evolve over time and may not be fully defined at the beginning of the project.
    Enabling continuous delivery: Agile organizations often use continuous delivery methods, which means that new features and functionality are delivered to users on a regular basis. This requires a more iterative approach to requirements management, as new requirements may be identified and prioritized during the delivery process.
    Enhancing collaboration and communication: Agile organizations place a greater emphasis on collaboration and communication between team members, stakeholders, and customers.
    Developing a user-centered approach: Agile organizations often take a user-centered approach to requirements gathering, which means that the needs and goals of the end-user are prioritized.

    Change within the team, and in the broader organization

    How to build an effective blend Agile and requirements management

    Within the team

    • Meetings should happen as needed
    • Handoffs should be clear and concise
    • Interactions should add value
    • Stand-ups should similarly add value, and shouldn't be for status updates

    Within the organization

    • PMO inclusion, to ensure alignment across the organization
    • Business/Operating areas, to recognize what they are committing to for time, resources, etc.
    • Finance, for how your project or product is funded
    • Governance and oversight, to ensure velocity is maintained

    "Whether in an Agile environment or not, collaboration and relationships are still required and important…how you collaborate, communicate, and how you build relationships are key."
    - Paula Bell, CEO, Paula A. Bell Consulting

    Get stakeholders on board with Agile requirements

    1. Stakeholder feedback and management support are key components of successful Agile requirements.
    2. Stakeholders can see a project's progression and provide critical feedback about its success at critical milestones.
    3. Management helps teams succeed by trusting them to complete projects with business value at top of mind and by removing impediments that are inhibiting their productivity.
    4. Agile will bring a new mindset and significant amounts of people, process, and technology changes that stakeholders and management may not be accustomed to. Working through these issues in requirements management enables a smoother rollout.
    5. Management will play a key role in ensuring long-term Agile requirements success and ultimately rolling it out to the rest of the organization.
    6. The value of leadership involvement has not changed even though responsibilities will. The day-to-day involvement in projects will change but continual feedback will ultimately dictate the success or failure of a project.

    4.1.1 Define your communication plan

    Estimated time: 60 Minutes

      1. Gather all relevant stakeholder to create a communication plan for project or product stakeholders.
      2. Have a team member facilitate the session.
      3. Identify
      4. ;
        1. Each stakeholder
        2. The nature of information they are interested in
        3. The channel or medium best to communicate with them
        4. The frequency of communication
      5. (Optional) Consider validating the results with the stakeholders, if not present.
      6. Document the results in the Agile Requirements Workbook and include in Agile Requirements Playbook.
      7. Revisit as needed, whether at the beginning of a new initiative, or over time, to ensure the content is still valid.

    Input

    • Participant knowledge and experience

    Output

    • A plan for communicating with stakeholders

    Materials

    • Agile Requirements Workbook

    Participants

    • Business Analyst(s)
    • Project Team

    Step 4.2

    Develop a Roadmap for Next Steps

    Activities

    4.2.1 Develop your Agile requirements action plan

    4.2.2 Prioritize with now, next, later

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Business Analyst(s)
    • Project Team
    • Sponsor/Executive
    • Relevant Stakeholders

    Outcomes of this step

    • A comprehensive and prioritized list of opportunities and improvements to be made to mature the Agile requirements practice.

    Planning Your Next Steps

    Identify opportunities to improve and close gaps

    Maturing at multiple levels

    With a mindset of continuous improvement, there is always some way we can get better.

    As you mature your Agile requirements practice, recognize that those gaps for improvement can come from multiple levels, from the organizational down to the individual.

    Each level will bring challenges and opportunities.

    The organization

    • Organizational culture
    • Organizational behavior
    • Political will
    • Unsupportive stakeholders

    The team

    • Current ways of working
    • Team standards, norms and values

    The individual

    • Practitioner skills
    • Practitioner experience
    • Level of training received

    Make sure your organization is ready to transition to Agile requirements management

    A cycle is depicted, with the following Terms: Learning; Automation; Integrated teams; Metrics and governance; Culture.

    Learning:

    Agile is a radical change in how people work
    and think. Structured, facilitated learning is required throughout the transformation to
    help leaders and practitioners go from

    doing Agile to being Agile.

    Automation:

    While Agile is tool-agnostic at its roots, Agile work management tools and DevOps inspired SDLC tools that have become a key part of Agile practices.

    Integrated Teams:


    While temporary project teams can get some benefits from Agile, standing, self-organizing teams that cross business, delivery, and operations are essential to gain the full benefits of Agile.

    Metrics and Governance:

    Successful Agile implementations
    require the disciplined use

    of delivery and operations
    metrics that support governance focused on developing better teams.

    Culture:

    Agile teams believe that value is best created by standing, self-organizing cross-functional teams who deliver sustainably in frequent,
    short increments supported by leaders
    who coach them through challenges.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Agile gaps may only have a short-term, perceived benefit. For example, coding without a team mindset can allow for maximum speed to market for a seasoned developer. Post-deployment maintenance initiatives, however, often lock the single developer as no one else understands the rationale for the decisions that were made.

    4.2.1 Develop your Agile requirements action plan

    Estimated time: 60 Minutes

    1. Gather all relevant stakeholder to create a road map and action plan for requirements management.
    2. Have a team member facilitate the session using the results of the Agile Requirements Maturity Assessment.
    3. Identify gaps from current to future state and brainstorm possible actions that can be taken to address those gaps. Resist the urge to analyze or discuss the feasibility of each idea at this stage. The intent is idea generation.
    4. When the group has exhausted all ideas, the facilitator should group like ideas together, with support from participants. Discuss any ideas that are unclear or ambiguous.
    5. Document the results in the Agile Requirements Workbook.

    Note: the feasibility and timing of the ideas will happen in the following "Now, Next, Later" exercise.

    Prioritize your roadmap

    Taking steps to mature your Agile requirements practice.

    An image of the Now; Next; Later technique.

    The "Now, Next, Later" technique is a method for prioritizing and planning improvements or tasks. This involves breaking down a list of tasks or improvements into three categories:

    • "Now" tasks are those that must be completed immediately. These tasks are usually urgent or critical, and they must be completed to keep the project or organization running smoothly.
    • "Next" tasks are those that should be completed soon. These tasks are not as critical as "now" tasks, but they are still important and should be tackled relatively soon.
    • "Later" tasks are those that can be completed later. These tasks are less critical and can be deferred without causing major problems.

    By using this technique, you can prioritize and plan the most important tasks first, while also allowing for flexibility and the ability to adjust plans as necessary.
    This process also helps you get a clear picture on what needs to be done first and what can be done later. This way you can work on the most important things first, and keep track of what you need to do next, for keeping the development/improvement process smooth and efficient.

    Monitor your progress

    Monitoring progress is important in achieving your target state. Be deliberate with your actions, to continue to mature your Agile requirements practice.

    As you navigate toward your target state, continue to monitor your progress, your successes, and your challenges. As your Agile requirements practice matures, you should see improvements in the stated metrics below.

    Establish a cadence to review these metrics, as well as how you are progressing on your roadmap, against the plan.

    This is not about adding work, but rather, about ensuring you're heading in the right direction; finding the balance in your Agile requirements practice.

    Metric
    Team satisfaction (%) Expect team satisfaction to increase as a result of clearer role delineation and value contribution.
    Stakeholder satisfaction (%) Expect stakeholder satisfaction to similarly increase, as requirements quality increases, bringing increased value.
    Requirements rework Measures the quality of requirements from your Agile projects. Expect that the requirements rework will decrease, in terms of volume/frequency.
    Cost of documentation Quantifies the cost of documentation, including elicitation, analysis, validation, presentation, and management.
    Time to delivery Balancing metric. We don't want improvements in other at the expense of time to delivery.

    Appendix

    Research Contributors and Experts

    This is a picture of Emal Bariali

    Emal Bariali
    Business Architect & Business Analyst
    Bariali Consulting

    Emal Bariali is a Senior Business Analyst and Business Architect with 17 years of experience, executing nearly 20 projects. He has experience in both waterfall and Agile methodologies and has delivered solutions in a variety of forms, including custom builds and turnkey projects. He holds a Master's degree in Information Systems from the University of Toronto, a Bachelor's degree in Information Technology from York University, and a post-diploma in Software & Database Development from Seneca College.

    This is a picture of Paula Bell

    Paula Bell
    Paula A. Bell Consulting, LLC

    Paula Bell is the CEO of Paula A Bell Consulting, LLC. She is a Business Analyst, Leadership and Career Development coach, consultant, speaker, and author with 21+ years of experience in corporate America in project roles including business analyst, requirements manager, business initiatives manager, business process quality manager, technical writer, project manager, developer, test lead, and implementation lead. Paula has experience in a variety of industries including media, courts, manufacturing, and financial. Paula has led multiple highly-visible multi-million-dollar technology and business projects to create solutions to transform businesses as either a consultant, senior business analyst, or manager.

    Currently she is Director of Operations for Bridging the Gap, where she oversees the entire operation and their main flagship certification program.

    This is a picture of Ryan Folster

    Ryan Folster
    Consulting Services Manager, Business Analysis
    Dimension Data

    Ryan Folster is a Business Analyst Lead and Product Professional from Johannesburg, South Africa. His strong focus on innovation and his involvement in the business analysis community have seen Ryan develop professionally from a small company, serving a small number of users, to large multi-national organizations. Having merged into business analysis through the business domain, Ryan has developed a firm grounding and provides context to the methodologies applied to clients and projects he is working on. Ryan has gained exposure to the Human Resources, Asset Management, and Financial Services sectors, working on projects that span from Enterprise Line of Business Software to BI and Compliance.

    Ryan is also heavily involved in the local chapter of IIBA®; having previously served as the chapter president, he currently serves as a non-executive board member. Ryan is passionate about the role a Business Analyst plays within an organization and is a firm believer that the role will develop further in the future and become a crucial aspect of any successful business.

    This is a picture of Filip Hendrickx

    Filip Hendrickx
    Innovating BA, Visiting Professor @ VUB
    altershape

    Filip loves bridging business analysis and innovation and mixes both in his work as speaker, trainer, coach, and consultant.

    As co-founder of the BA & Beyond Conference and IIBA Brussels Chapter president, Filip helps support the BA profession and grow the BA community in and around Belgium. For these activities, Filip received the 2022 IIBA® EMEA Region Volunteer of the Year Award.

    Together with Ian Richards, Filip is the author ofBrainy Glue, a business novel on business analysis, innovation and change. Filip is also co-author of the BCS book Digital Product Management and Cycles, a book, method and toolkit enabling faster innovation.

    This is a picture of Fabricio Laguna

    Fabricio Laguna
    Professional Speaker, Consultant, and Trainer
    TheBrazilianBA.com

    Fabrício Laguna, aka The Brazilian BA, is the main reference on business analysis in Brazil. Author and producer of videos, articles, classes, lectures, and playful content, he can explain complex things in a simple and easy-to-understand way. IIBA Brazil Chapter president between 2012-2022. CBAP, AAC, CPOA, PMP, MBA. Consultant and instructor for more than 25 years working with business analysis, methodology, solution development, systems analysis, project management, business architecture, and systems architecture. His online courses are approved by students from 65 countries.

    This is a picture of Ryland Leyton

    Ryland Leyton
    Business Analyst and Agile Coach
    Independent Consultant

    Ryland Leyton, CBAP, PMP, CSM, is an avid Agile advocate and coach, business analyst, author, speaker, and educator. He has worked in the technology sector since 1998, starting off with database and web programming, gradually moving through project management and finding his passion in the BA and Agile fields. He has been a core team member of the IIBA Extension to the BABOK and the IIBA Agile Analysis Certification. Ryland has written popular books on agility, business analysis, and career. He can be reached at www.RylandLeyton.com.

    This is a picture of Steve Jones

    Steve Jones
    Supervisor, Market Support Business Analysis
    ISO New England

    Steve is a passionate analyst and BA manager with more than 20 years of experience in improving processes, services and software, working across all areas of software development lifecycle, business change and business analysis. He rejoices in solving complex business problems and increasing process reproducibility and compliance through the application of business analysis tools and techniques.

    Steve is currently serving as VP of Education for IIBA Hartford. He is a CBAP, certified SAFe Product Owner/Product Manager, Six Sigma Green Belt, and holds an MS in Information Management and Communications.

    This is a picture of Angela Wick

    Angela Wick
    Founder
    BA-Squared and BA-Cube

    Founder of BA-Squared and BA-Cube.com, Angela is passionate about teaching practical, modern product ownership and BA skills. With over 20 years' experience she takes BA skills to the next level and into the future!
    Angela is also a LinkedIn Learning instructor on Agile product ownership and business analysis, an IC-Agile Authorized Trainer, Product Owner and BA highly-rated trainer, highly-rated speaker, sought-after workshop facilitator, and contributor to many industry publications, including:

    • IIBA BABOK v3 Core Team, leading author on the BABOK v3
    • Expert Reviewer, IIBA Agile Extension to the BABOK
    • PMI BA Practice Guide – Expert Reviewer
    • PMI Requirements Management Practice Guide – Expert Reviewer
    • IIBA Competency Model – Lead Author and Team Lead, V1, V2, and V3.

    This is a picture of Rachael Wilterdink

    Rachael Wilterdink
    Principal Consultant
    Infotech Enterprises

    Rachael Wilterdink is a Principal Consultant with Infotech Enterprises. With over 25 years of IT experience, she holds multiple business analysis and Agile certifications. As a consultant, Rachael has served clients in the financial, retail, manufacturing, healthcare, government, non-profit, and insurance industries. Giving back to the professional community, Ms. Wilterdink served on the boards of her local IIBA® and PMI® chapters. As a passionate public speaker, Rachael presents various topics at conferences and user groups across the country and the world. Rachael is also the author of the popular eBook "40 Agile Transformation Pain Points (and how to avoid or manage them)."

    Bibliography

    "2021 Business Agility Report: Rising to the Challenge." Business Agility, 2021. Accessed 13 June 2022.
    Axure. "The Pitfalls of Agile and How We Got Here". Axure. Accessed 14 November 2022.
    Beck, Kent, et al. "Manifesto for Agile Software Development." Agilemanifesto. 2001.
    Brock, Jon, et al. "Large-Scale IT Projects: From Nightmare to Value Creation." BCG, 25 May 2015.
    Bryar, Colin and Bill Carr. "Have We Taken Agile Too Far?" Harvard Business Review, 9 April 2021. Accessed 11 November, 2022.
    Clarke, Thomas. "When Agile Isn't Responsive to Business Goals" RCG Global Services, Accessed 14 November 2022.
    Digital.ai "The 15th State of Agile Report". Digital.ai. Accessed 21 November 2022.
    Hackshall, Robin. "Product Backlog Refinement." Scrum Alliance. 9 Oct. 2014.
    Hartman, Bob. "New to Agile? INVEST in good user stories." Agile For All.
    IAG Consulting. "Business Analysis Benchmark: Full Report." IAG Consulting, 2009.
    Karlsson, Johan. "Backlog Grooming: Must-Know Tips for High-Value Products." Perforce. 18 May 2018
    KPMG. Agile Transformation (2019 Survey on Agility). KPMG. Accessed November 29.
    Laguna, Fabricio "REQM guidance matrix: A framework to drive requirements management", Requirements Engineering Magazine. 12 September 2017. Accessed 10 November 2022.
    Miller, G. J. (2013). Agile problems, challenges, & failures. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2013—North America, New Orleans, LA. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
    Product Management: MoSCoW Prioritization." ProductPlan, n.d. Web.
    Podeswa, Howard "The Business Case for Agile Business Analysis" Requirements Engineering Magazine. 21 February 2017. Accessed 7 November 2022.
    PPM Express. "Why Projects Fail: Business Analysis is the Key". PPM Express. Accessed 16 November 2022.
    Reifer, Donald J. "Quantitative Analysis of Agile Methods Study: Twelve Major Findings." InfoQ, 6 February, 2017.
    Royce, Dr. Winston W. "Managing the Development of Large Software Systems." Scf.usc.edu. 1970. (royce1970.pdf (usc.edu))
    Rubin, Kenneth S. Essential Scrum: A Practical Guide to the Most Popular Agile Process. Pearson Education. 2012.
    Singer, Michael. "15+ Surprising Agile Statistics: Everything You Need To Know About Agile Management". Enterprise Apps Today. 22 August 2022.
    The Standish Group. The Chaos Report, 2015. The Standish Group.

    Where do I go next?

    Improve Requirements Gathering

    Back to basics: great products are built on great requirements.

    Make the Case for Product Delivery

    Align your organization on the practices to deliver what matters most.

    Requirements for Small and Medium Enterprises

    Right-size the guidelines of your requirements gathering process.

    Implement Agile Practices that Work

    Improve collaboration and transparency with the business to minimize project failure.

    Create an Agile-Friendly Gating and Governance Model

    Use Info-Tech's Agile Gating Framework as a guide to gating your Agile projects following a "trust but verify" approach.

    Make Your IT Governance Adaptable

    Governance isn't optional, so keep it simple and make it flexible.

    Deliver on Your Digital Product Vision

    Build a product vision your organization can take from strategy through execution.