Harness Configuration Management Superpowers

  • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}303|cart{/j2store}
  • member rating overall impact: 8.5/10 Overall Impact
  • member rating average dollars saved: $12,999 Average $ Saved
  • member rating average days saved: 10 Average Days Saved
  • Parent Category Name: Asset Management
  • Parent Category Link: /asset-management
  • Configuration management databases (CMDB) are a lot of work to build and maintain. Starting down this process without the right tools, processes, and buy-in is a lot of work with very little reward.
  • If you decide to just build it and expect they will come, you may find it difficult to articulate the value, and you will be disappointed by the lack of visitors.
  • Relying on manual entry or automated data collection without governance may result in data you can’t trust, and if no one trusts the data, they won’t use it.

Our Advice

Critical Insight

  • The right mindset is just as important as the right tools. By involving everyone early, you can ensure the right data is captured and validated and you can make maintenance part of the culture. This is critical to reaching early and continual value with a CMDB.

Impact and Result

  • Define your use cases: Identify the use cases and prioritize those objectives into phases. Define what information will be needed to meet the use cases and how that information will be populated.
  • Understand and design the CMDB data model: Define services and undiscoverable configuration items (CI) and map them to the discoverable CIs.
  • Operationalize configuration record updates: Define data stewards and governance processes and integrate your configuration management practice with existing practices and lifecycles.

Harness Configuration Management Superpowers Research & Tools

Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

1. Harness Configuration Management Superpowers Deck – A step-by-step document that walks you through creating a configuration management program.

Use this blueprint to create a configuration management program that provides immediate value.

  • Harness Configuration Management Superpowers – Phases 1-4

2. Configuration Management Project Charter Template – A project charter template to help you build a concise document for communicating appropriate project details to stakeholders.

Use this template to create a project charter to launch the configuration management project.

  • Configuration Management Project Charter

3. Configuration Control Board Charter Template – A board charter template to help you define the roles and responsibilities of the configuration control board.

Use this template to create your board charter for your configuration control board (CCB). Define roles and responsibilities and mandates for the CCB.

  • Configuration Control Board Charter

4. Configuration Management Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) Template – An SOP template to describe processes and procedures for ongoing maintenance of the CMDB under the configuration management program.

Use this template to create and communicate your SOP to ensure ongoing maintenance of the CMDB under the configuration management program.

  • Configuration Management Standard Operation Procedures

5. Configuration Management Audit and Validation Checklist Template – A template to be used as a starting point to meet audit requirements under NIST and ITIL programs.

Use this template to assess capability to pass audits, adding to the template as needed to meet internal auditors’ requirements.

  • Configuration Management Audit and Validation Checklist

6. Configuration Management Policy Template – A template to be used for building out a policy for governance over the configuration management program.

Use this template to build a policy for your configuration management program.

  • Configuration Management Policy

7. Use Cases and Data Worksheet – A template to be used for validating data requirements as you work through use cases.

Use this template to determine data requirements to meet use cases.

  • Use Cases and Data Worksheet

8. Configuration Management Diagram Template Library – Examples of process workflows and data modeling.

Use this library to view sample workflows and a data model for the configuration management program.

  • Configuration Management Diagram Template Library (Visio)
  • Configuration Management Diagram Template Library (PDF)

9. Configuration Manager Job Description – Roles and responsibilities for the job of Configuration Manager.

Use this template as a starting point to create a job posting, identifying daily activities, responsibilities, and required skills as you create or expand your configuration management program.

  • Configuration Manager

Infographic

Workshop: Harness Configuration Management Superpowers

Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

1 Configuration Management Strategy

The Purpose

Define the scope of your service configuration management project.

Design the program to meet specific stakeholders needs

Identify project and operational roles and responsibilities.

Key Benefits Achieved

Designed a sustainable approach to building a CMDB.

Activities

1.1 Introduction

1.2 Define challenges and goals.

1.3 Define and prioritize use cases.

1.4 Identify data needs to meet these goals.

1.5 Define roles and responsibilities.

Outputs

Data and reporting use cases based on stakeholder requirements

Roles and responsibility matrix

2 CMDB Data Structure

The Purpose

Build a data model around the desired use cases.

Identify the data sources for populating the CMDB.

Key Benefits Achieved

Identified which CIs and relationships will be captured in the CMDB.

Activities

2.1 Define and prioritize your services.

2.2 Evaluate CMDB default classifications.

2.3 Test configuration items against existing categories.

2.4 Build a data model diagram.

Outputs

List of CI types and relationships to be added to default settings

CMDB data model diagram

3 Processes

The Purpose

Key Benefits Achieved

Built a right-sized approach to configuration record updates and data validation.

Activities

3.1 Define processes for onboarding, offboarding, and maintaining data in the CMDB.

3.2 Define practices for configuration baselines.

3.3 Build a data validation and auditing plan.

Outputs

Documented processes and workflows

Data validation and auditing plan

4 Communications & Roadmap

The Purpose

Key Benefits Achieved

Metrics program defined

Communications designed

Activities

4.1 Define key metrics for configuration management.

4.2 Define metrics for supporting services.

4.3 Build configuration management policies.

4.4 Create a communications plan.

4.5 Build a roadmap

Outputs

Policy for configuration management

Communications documents

Roadmap for next steps

Further reading

Harness Configuration Management Superpowers

Create a configuration management practice that will provide ongoing value to the organization.

EXECUTIVE BRIEF

Analyst Perspective

A robust configuration management database (CMDB) can provide value to the business and superpowers to IT. It's time to invest smartly to reap the rewards.

IT environments are becoming more and more complex, and balancing demands for stability and demands for faster change requires visibility to make the right decisions. IT needs to know their environment intimately. They need to understand dependencies and integrations and feel confident they are making decisions with the most current and accurate view.

Solutions for managing operations rely on the CMDB to bring visibility to issues, calculate impact, and use predictive analytics to fix performance issues before they become major incidents. AIOps solutions need accurate data, but they can also help identify configuration drift and flag changes or anomalies that need investigation.

The days of relying entirely on manual entry and updates are all but gone, as the functionality of a robust configuration management system requires daily updates to provide value. We used to rely on that one hero to make sure information was up to date, but with the volume of changes we see in most environments today, it's time to improve the process and provide superpowers to the entire IT department.

This is a picture of Sandi Conrad

Sandi Conrad, ITIL Managing Professional
Principal Research Director, IT Infrastructure & Operations, Info-Tech Research Group

Executive Summary

Your Challenge

  • Build a configuration management database (CMDB): You need to implement a CMDB, populate it with records and relationships, and integrate it with discovery and management tools.
  • Identify the benefits of a CMDB: Too many CMDB projects fail because IT tries to collect everything. Base your data model on the desired use cases.
  • Define roles and responsibilities: Keeping data accurate and updated is difficult. Identify who will be responsible for helping

Common Obstacles

  • Significant process maturity is required: Service configuration management (SCM) requires high maturity in change management, IT asset management, and service catalog practices.
  • Large investment: Building a CMDB takes a large amount of effort, process, and expertise.
  • Tough business case: Configuration management doesn't directly provide value to the business, but it requires a lot of investment from IT.

Info-Tech's Approach

  • Define your scope and objectives: Identify the use cases for SCM and prioritize those objectives into phases.
  • Design the CMDB data model: Align with your existing configuration management system's data model.
  • Operationalize configuration record updates: Integrate your SCM practice with existing practices and lifecycles.

Start small

Scope creep is a serial killer of configuration management databases and service configuration management practices.

Insight summary

Many vendors are taking a CMDB-first approach to enable IT operations or sometimes asset management. It's important to ensure processes are in place immediately to ensure the data doesn't go stale as additional modules and features are activated.

Define processes early to ensure success

The right mindset is just as important as the right tools. By involving everyone early, you can ensure the right data is captured and validated and you can make maintenance part of the culture. This is critical to reaching early and continual value with a CMDB.

Identify use cases

The initial use case will be the driving force behind the first assessment of return on investment (ROI). If ROI can be realized early, momentum will increase, and the team can build on the initial successes.

If you don't see value in the first year, momentum diminishes and it's possible the project will never see value.

Keep the initial scope small and focused

Discovery can collect a lot of data quickly, and it's possible to be completely overwhelmed early in the process.

Build expertise and troubleshoot issues with a smaller scope, then build out the process.

Minimize customizations

Most CMDBs have classes and attributes defined as defaults. Use of the defaults will enable easier implementation and faster time to value, especially where automations and integrations depend on standard terms for field mapping.

Automate as much as possible

In large, complex environments, the data can quickly become unmanageable. Use automation as much as possible for discovery, dependency mapping, validation, and alerts. Minimize the amount of manual work but ensure everyone is aware of where and how these manual updates need to happen to see continual value.

Info-Tech's Harness Configuration Management Superpowers.

Configuration management will improve functionality of all surrounding processes

A well-functioning CMDB empowers almost all other IT management and governance practices.

Service configuration management is about:

  • Building a system of record about IT services and the components that support those services.
  • Continuously reconciling and validating information to ensure data accuracy.
  • Ensuring the data lifecycle is defined and well understood and can pass data and process audits.
  • Accessing information in a variety of ways to effectively serve IT and the business.
An image of Info-Tech's CMDB Configuration Management tree, breaking down aspects into the following six categories: Strategic Partner; Service Provider; Proactive; Stabilize; Core; and Foundational.

Configuration management most closely impacts these practices

Info-Tech Research Group sees a clear relationship.

When an IT department reports they are highly effective at configuration management, they are much more likely to report they are highly effective at these management and governance processes:

The following management and governance processes are listed: Quality Management; Asset Management; Performance Measurement; Knowledge Management; Release Management; Incident and Problem Management; Service Management; Change Management.

The data is clear

Service configuration management is about more than just doing change management more effectively.

Source: Info-Tech Research Group, IT Management and Governance Diagnostic; N=684 organizations, 2019 to July 2022.

Make the case to use configuration management to improve IT operations

Consider the impact of access to data for informing innovations, optimization efforts, and risk assessments.

75% of Uptime's 2021 survey respondents who had an outage in the past three years said the outage would have been prevented if they'd had better management or processes.(1)

75%

75% of Uptime's 2021 survey respondents who had an outage in the past three years said the outage would have been prevented if they'd had better management or processes.(1)

42%

of publicly reported outages were due to software or configuration issues. (1)

58%

of networking-related IT outages were due to configuration and change management failure.(1)

It doesn't have to be that way!

Enterprise-grade IT service management (ITSM) tools require a CMDB for the different modules to work together and to enable IT operations management (ITOM), providing greater visibility.

Decisions about changes can be made with accurate data, not guesses.

The CMDB can give the service desk fast access to helpful information about the impacted components, including a history of similar incidents and resolutions and the relationship between the impacted components and other systems and components.

Turn your team into IT superheroes.

CMDB data makes it easier for IT Ops groups to:

  • Avoid change collisions.
  • Eliminate poor changes due to lack of visibility into complex systems.
  • Identify problematic equipment.
  • Troubleshoot incidents.
  • Expand the services provided by tier 1 and through automation.

Benefits of configuration management

For IT

  • Configuration management will supercharge processes that have relied on inherent knowledge of the IT environment to make decisions.
  • IT will more quickly analyze and understand issues and will be positioned to improve and automate issue identification and resolution.
  • Increase confidence and reduce risks for decisions involving release and change management with access to accurate data, regardless of the complexity of the environment.
  • Reduce or eliminate unplanned work related to poor outcomes due to decisions made with incorrect or incomplete data.

For the Business

  • Improve strategic planning for business initiatives involving IT solutions, which may include integrations, development, or security concerns.
  • More quickly deploy new solutions or updates due to visibility into complex environments.
  • Enable business outcomes with reliable and stable IT systems.
  • Reduce disruptions caused by planning without accurate data and improve resolution times for service interruptions.
  • Improve access to reporting for budgeting, showbacks, and chargebacks as well as performance metrics.

Measure the value of this blueprint

Fast-track your planning and increase the success of a configuration management program with this blueprint

Workshop feedback
8.1/10

$174,000 savings

30 average days saved

Guided Implementation feedback

8.7/10

$31,496 average savings

41 average days saved

"The workshop was well run, with good facilitation, and gained participation from even the most difficult parts of the audience. The best part of the experience was that if I were to find myself in the same position in the future, I would repeat the workshop."

– University of Exeter

Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

DIY Toolkit

“Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful.”

Guided Implementation

“Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track.”

Workshop

“We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place.”

Consulting

“Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project.”

Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

Guided Implementation

What does a typical GI on this topic look like?

Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4

Call #1: Scope requirements, objectives, and your specific challenges.

Call #2: Prioritize services and use cases.

Call #3: Identify data needed to meet goals.

Call #4: Define roles and responsibilities.

Call #5: Define and prioritize your services.

Call #6: Evaluate and test CMDB default classifications.

Call #7: Build a data model diagram.

Call #8: Define processes for onboarding, offboarding, and maintaining data.

Call #9: Discuss configuration baselines.

Call #10: Build a data validation and audit plan.

Call #11: Define key metrics.

Call #12: Build a configuration management policy and communications plan.

Call #13: Build a roadmap.

A Guided Implementation (GI) is a series of calls with an Info-Tech analyst to help implement our best practices in your organization.

A typical GI is between 8 to 12 calls over the course of 4 to 9 months.

Workshop Overview

Contact your account representative for more information.
workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8889

Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4

Configuration Management Strategy

CMDB Data Structure

Process Design

Communications & Roadmap

Activities
  • Introduction
  • Define challenges and goals.
  • Define and prioritize use cases.
  • Identify data needed to meet goals.
  • Define roles and responsibilities.
  • Define and prioritize your services.
  • Evaluate CMDB default classifications.
  • Test configuration items against existing categories.
  • Build a data model diagram.
  • Define processes for onboarding, offboarding, and maintaining data in the CMDB.
  • Define practices for configuration baselines.
  • Build a data validation and auditing plan.
  • Define key metrics for configuration management.
  • Define metrics for supporting services.
  • Build configuration management policies.
  • Create a communications plan.
  • Build a roadmap.

Deliverables

  • Roles and responsibility matrix
  • Data and reporting use cases based on stakeholder requirements
  • List of CI types and relationships to be added to default settings
  • CMDB data model diagram
  • Documented processes and workflows
  • Data validation and auditing plan
  • Policy for configuration management
  • Roadmap for next steps
  • Communications documents

Blueprint deliverables

Each step of this blueprint is accompanied by supporting deliverables to help you accomplish your goals:

Configuration Management Project Charter

Detail your approach to building an SCM practice and a CMDB.

Screenshot from the Configuration Management Project Charter

Use Cases and Data Worksheet

Capture the action items related to your SCM implementation project.

Screenshot from the Use Cases and Data Worksheet

Configuration Manager Job Description

Use our template for a job posting or internal job description.

Screenshot from the Configuration Manager Job Description

Configuration Management Diagram Template Library

Use these diagrams to simplify building your SOP.

Screenshot from the Configuration Management Diagram Template Library

Configuration Management Policy

Set expectations for configuration control.

screenshot from the Configuration Management Policy

Configuration Management Audit and Validation Checklist

Use this framework to validate controls.

Screenshot from the Configuration Management Audit and Validation Checklist

Configuration Control Board Charter

Define the board's responsibilities and meeting protocols.

Screenshot from the Configuration Management Audit and Validation Checklist

Key deliverable:

Configuration Management Standard Operating Procedures Template

Outlines SCM roles and responsibilities, the CMDB data model, when records are expected to change, and configuration baselines.

Four Screenshots from the Configuration Management Standard Operating Procedures Template

Phase 1

Configuration Management Strategy

Strategy Data Structure Processes Roadmap
  • Challenges and Goals
  • Use Cases and Data
  • Roles and Responsibilities
  • Services
  • Classifications
  • Data Modeling
  • Lifecycle Processes
  • Baselines
  • Audit and Data Validation
  • Metrics
  • Communications Plan
  • Roadmap

This phase will walk you through the following aspects of a configuration management system:

  • Scope
  • Use Cases
  • Reports and Analytics

This phase involves the following participants:

  • IT and business service owners
  • Business/customer relationship managers
  • Enterprise architects
  • Practice owners and managers
  • SCM practice manager
  • SCM project manager
  • SCM project sponsor

Harness Service Configuration Management Superpowers

Establish clear definitions

Ensure everyone is using the same terms.

Term Definition
Configuration Management

The purpose of configuration management is to:

  • "Ensure that accurate and reliable information about the configuration of services, and the CIs that support them, is available when and where it is needed. This includes information on how CIs are configured and the relationships between them" (AXELOS).
  • "Provide sufficient information about service assets to enable the service to be effectively managed. Assess the impact of changes and deal with service incidents" (ISACA, 2018).
Configuration Management System (CMS) A set of tools and databases used to manage, update, and present data about all configuration items and their relationships. A CMS may maintain multiple federated CMDBs and can include one or many discovery and dependency mapping tools.
Configuration Management Database (CMDB) A repository of configuration records. It can be as simple as a spreadsheet or as complex as an integrated database populated through multiple autodiscovery tools.
Configuration Record Detailed information about a configuration item.
Configuration Item (CI)

"Any component that needs to be managed in order to deliver an IT service" (AXELOS).

These components can include everything from IT services and software to user devices, IT infrastructure components, and documents (e.g. maintenance agreements).
Attributes Characteristics of a CI included in the configuration record. Common attributes include name, version, license expiry date, location, supplier, SLA, and owner.
Relationships Information about the way CIs are linked. A CI can be part of another CI, connect to another CI, or use another CI. A CMDB is significantly more valuable when relationships are recorded. This information allows CMDB users to identify dependencies between components when investigating incidents, performing root-cause analysis, assessing the impact of changes before deployment, and much more.

What is a configuration management database (CMDB)?

The CMDB is a system of record of your services and includes a record for everything you need to track to effectively manage your IT services.

Anything that is tracked in your CMDB is called a configuration item (CI). Examples of CIs include:

  • User-Facing Services
  • IT-Facing Services
  • Business Capabilities
  • Relationships
  • IT Infrastructure Components
  • Enterprise Software
  • End-User Devices
  • Documents

Other systems of record can refer to CIs, such as:

  • Ticket database: Tickets can refer to which CI is impacted by an incident or provided as part of a service request.
  • Asset management database (AMDB): An IT asset is often also a CI. By associating asset records with CI records, you can leverage your IT asset data in your reporting.
  • Financial systems: If done well, the CMDB can supercharge your IT financial cost model.

CMDBs can allow you to:

  • Query multiple databases simultaneously (so long as you have the CI name field in each database).
  • Build automated workflows and chatbots that interact with data across multiple databases.
  • More effectively identify the potential impact of changes and releases.

Do not confuse asset with configuration

Asset and configuration management look at the same world through different lenses

  • IT asset management (ITAM) tends to focus on each IT asset in its own right: assignment or ownership, lifecycle, and related financial obligations and entitlements.
  • Configuration management is focused on configuration items (CIs) that must be managed to deliver a service and the relationships and integrations with other CIs.
  • ITAM and configuration management teams and practices should work closely together. Though asset and configuration management focus on different outcomes, they may use overlapping tools and data sets. Each practice, when working effectively, can strengthen the other.
  • Many objects will exist in both the CMDB and AMDB, and the data on those shared objects will need to be kept in sync.

A comparison between Asset and Configuration Management Databases

*Discovery, dependency mapping, and data normalization are often features or modules of configuration management, asset management, or IT service management tools.

Start with ITIL 4 guiding principles to make your configuration management project valuable and realistic

Focus on where CMDB data will provide value and ensure the cost of bringing that data in will be reasonable for its purpose. Your end goal should be not just to build a CMDB but to use a CMDB to manage workload and workflows and manage services appropriately.

Focus on value

Include only the relevant information required by stakeholders.

Start where you are

Use available sources of information. Avoid adding new sources and tools unless they are justified.

Progress iteratively with feedback

Regularly review information use and confirm its relevance, adjusting the CMDB scope if needed.

Collaborate and promote visibility

Explain and promote available sources of configuration information and the best ways to use them, then provide hints and tips for more efficient use.

Think and work holistically

Consider other sources of data for decision making. Do not try to put everything in the CMDB.

Keep it simple and practical

Provide relevant information in the most convenient way; avoid complex interfaces and reports.

Optimize and automate

Continually optimize resource-consuming practice activities. Automate CDMB verification, data collection, relationship discovery, and other activities.

ITIL 4 guiding principles as described by AXELOS

Step 1.1

Identify use cases and desired benefits for service configuration management

Activities

1.1.1 Brainstorm data collection challenges

1.1.2 Define goals and how you plan to meet them

1.1.3 Brainstorm and prioritize use cases

1.1.4 Identify the data needed to reach your goals

1.1.5 Record required data sources

This step will walk you through the following aspects of a configuration management system:

  • Scope
  • Use cases

This phase involves the following participants:

  • IT and business service owners
  • Business/customer relationship managers
  • Enterprise architects
  • Practice owners and managers
  • SCM practice manager
  • Project sponsor
  • Project manager

Identify potential obstacles in your organization to building and maintaining a CMDB

Often, we see multiple unsuccessful attempts to build out a CMDB, with teams eventually losing faith and going back to spreadsheets. These are common obstacles:

  • Significant manual data collection, which is rarely current and fully accurate.
  • Multiple discovery solutions creating duplicate records, with no clear path to deduplicate records.
  • Manual dependency mapping that isn't accurate because it's not regularly assessed and updated.
  • Hybrid cloud and on-premises environment with discovery solutions only partially collecting as the right discovery and dependency mapping solutions aren't in place.
  • Dynamic environments (virtual, cloud, or containers) that may exist for a very short time, but no one knows how they should be managed.
  • Lack of expertise to maintain and update the CMDB or lack of an assigned owner for the CMDB. If no one owns the process and is assigned as a steward of data, it will not be maintained.
  • Database that was designed with other purposes in mind and is heavily customized, making it difficult to use and maintain.

Understanding the challenges to accessing and maintaining quality data will help define the risks created through lack of quality data.

This knowledge can drive buy-in to create a configuration management practice that benefits the organization.

1.1.1 Brainstorm data collection challenges

Involve stakeholders.
Allot 45 minutes for this discussion.

  1. As a group, brainstorm the challenges you have with data:
  2. Accuracy and trustworthiness: What challenges do you have with getting accurate data on IT services and systems?
    1. Access: Where do you have challenges with getting data to people when they need it?
    2. Manually created data: Where are you relying on data that could be automatically collected?
    3. Data integration: Where do you have issues with integrating data from multiple sources?
    4. Impact: What is the result of these challenges?
  3. Group together these challenges into similar issues and identify what goals would help overcome them.
  4. Record these challenges in the Configuration Management Project Charter, section 1.2: Project Purpose.

Download the Configuration Management Project Charter

Input

Output

  • None
  • List of high-level desired benefits for SCM
Materials Participants
  • Whiteboard/flip charts
  • Sticky notes
  • Markers/pens
  • Configuration Management Project Charter
  • IT and business service owners
  • Business/customer relationship managers
  • Practice owners and managers
  • SCM practice manager
  • SCM project sponsor

Info-Tech Maturity Ladder

Identify your current and target state

INNOVATOR

  • Characteristics of business partner
  • Integration with orchestration tools

BUSINESS PARTNER

Data collection and validation is fully automated

Integrated with several IT processes

Meets the needs of IT and business use cases

TRUSTED OPERATOR

  • Data collection and validation is partially or fully automated
  • Trust in data accuracy is high, meets the needs of several IT use cases

FIREFIGHTER

  • Data collection is partially or fully automated, validation is ad hoc
  • Trust in data accuracy is variable, used for decision making

UNSTABLE

INNOVATOR

  • Characteristics of business partner
  • Integration with orchestration tools

BUSINESS PARTNER

  • Data collection and validation is fully automated
  • Integrated with several IT processes
  • Meets the needs of IT and business use cases

TRUSTED OPERATOR

  • Data collection and validation is partially or fully automated
  • Trust in data accuracy is high, meets the needs of several IT use cases

FIREFIGHTER

  • Data collection is partially or fully automated, validation is ad hoc
  • Trust in data accuracy is variable, used for decision making

UNSTABLE

A tower is depicted, with arrows pointing to Current (orange) and Target(blue)

Define goals for your CMDB to ensure alignment with all stakeholders

  • How are business or IT goals being hindered by not having the right data available?
  • If the business isn't currently asking for service-based reporting and accountability, start with IT goals. This will help to develop goals that will be most closely aligned to the IT teams' needs and may help incentivize the right behavior in data maintenance.
  • Configuration management succeeds by enabling its stakeholders to achieve their outcomes. Set goals for configuration management based on the most important outcomes expected from this project. Ask your stakeholders:
    1. What are the business' or IT's planned transformational initiatives?
    2. What are your highest priority goals?
    3. What should the priorities of the configuration management practice be?
  • The answers to these questions will shape your approach to configuration management. Direct input from your leadership and executives, or their delegates, will help ensure you're setting a solid foundation for your practice.
  • Identify which obstacles will need to be overcome to meet these goals.

"[T]he CMDB System should be viewed as a 'system of relevance,' rather than a 'single source of truth.' The burdens of relevance are at once less onerous and far more meaningful in terms of action, analysis, and automation. While 'truth' implies something everlasting or at least stable, relevance suggests a far more dynamic universe."

– CMDB Systems, Making Change Work in the Age of Cloud and Agile, Drogseth et al

Identify stakeholders to discuss what they need from a CMDB; business and IT needs will likely differ

Define your audience to determine who the CMDB will serve and invite them to these conversations. The CMDB can aid the business and IT and can be structured to provide dashboards and reports for both.

Nondiscoverable configuration items will need to be created for both audiences to organize CIs in a way that makes sense for all uses.

Integrations with other systems may be required to meet the needs of your audience. Note integrations for future planning.

Business Services

Within the data sets, service configuration models can be used for:

  • Impact analysis
  • Cause and effect analysis
  • Risk analysis
  • Cost allocation
  • Availability analysis and planning

Technical Services

Connect to IT Finance for:

  • Service-based consumption and costing
  • Financial awareness through showback
  • Financial recovery through chargeback
  • Support IT strategy through financial transparency
  • Cost optimization
  • Reporting for depreciation, location-related taxation, and capitalization (may also use asset management for these)

Intersect with IT Processes to:

  • Reduce time to restore services through incident management
  • Improve stability through change management
  • Reduce outages through problem management
  • Optimize assets through IT asset management
  • Provide detailed reporting for audit/governance, risk, and compliance

1.1.2 Define goals and how you plan to meet them

Involve stakeholders.

Allot 45 minutes for this discussion.

As a group, identify current goals for building and using a CMDB.

Why are we doing this?

  • How do you hope to use the data within the CMDB?
  • What processes will be improved through use of this data and what are the expected outcomes?

How will we improve the process?

  • What processes will be put in place to ensure data integrity?
  • What tools will be put in place to improve the methods used to collect and maintain data?

Record these goals in the Configuration Management Project Charter, section 1.3: Project Objectives.

Input

Output

  • None
  • List of high-level desired benefits for SCM
Materials Participants
  • Whiteboard/flip charts
  • Sticky notes
  • Markers/pens
  • Configuration Management Project Charter
  • IT and business service owners
  • Business/customer relationship managers
  • Practice owners and managers
  • SCM practice manager
  • SCM project sponsor

It's easy to think that if you build it, they will come, but CMDBs rarely succeed without solid use cases

Set expectations for your organization that defined and fulfilled use cases will factor into prioritization exercises, functional plans, and project milestones to achieve ROI for your efforts.

A good use case:

  • Justifies resource allocation
  • Gains funding for the right tools
  • Builds stakeholder support
  • Drives interest and excitement
  • Gains support from anyone in a position to help build out and validate the data
  • Helps to define success

In the book CMDB Systems, Making Change Work in the Age of Cloud and Agile, authors Drogseth, Sturm, and Twing describe the secrets of success:

A documented evaluation of CMDB System vendors showed that while most "best case" ROI fell between 6 and 9 months for CMDB deployments, one instance delivered ROI for a significant CMDB investment in as little as 2 weeks!

If there's a simple formula for quick time to value for a CMDB System, it's the following:

Mature levels of process awareness
+ Strong executive level support
+ A ready and willing team with strongly supportive stakeholders
+ Clearly defined and ready phase one use case
+ Carefully selected, appropriate technologies

All this = Powerful early-phase CMDB System results

Define and prioritize use cases for how the CMDB will be used to drive value

The CMDB can support several use cases and may require integration with various modules within the ITSM solution and integration with other systems.

Document the use cases that will drive your CMDB to relevance, including the expected benefits for each use case.

Identify the dependencies that will need to be implemented to be successful.

Define "done" so that once data is entered, verified, and mapped, these use cases can be realized.

"Our consulting experience suggests that more than 75% of all strategic initiatives (CMDB or not) fail to meet at least initial expectations across IT organizations. This is often due more to inflated expectations than categorical failure."

– CMDB Systems, Making Change Work in the Age of Cloud and Agile, Drogseth et al.

This image demonstrates how CMBD will be used to drive value.

After identifying use cases, determine the scope of configuration items required to feed the use cases

On-premises software and equipment will be critical to many use cases as the IT team and partners work on network and data-center equipment, enterprise software, and integrations through various means, including APIs and middleware. Real-time and near real-time data collection and validation will ensure IT can act with confidence.

Cloud use can include software as a service (SaaS) solutions as well as infrastructure and platform as a service (IaaS and PaaS), and this may be more challenging for data collection. Tools must be capable of connecting to cloud environments and feeding the information back into the CMDB. Where on-premises and cloud applications show dependencies, you might need to validate data if multiple discovery and dependency mapping solutions are used to get a complete picture. Tagging will be crucial to making sense of the data as it comes into the CMDB.

In-house developed software would be beneficial to have in the CMDB but may require more manual work to identify and classify once discovered. A combination of discovery and tagging may be beneficial to input and classification.

Highly dynamic environments may require data collection through integration with a variety of solutions to manage and record continuous deployment models and verifications, or they may rely on tags and activity logs to record historical activity. Work with a partner who specializes in CI/CD to help architect this use case.

Containers will require an assessment of the level of detail required. Determine if the container is a CI and if the content will be described as attributes. If there is value to your use case to map the contents of each container as separate CIs within the container CI, then you can map to that level of detail, but don't map to that depth unless the use case calls for it.

Internet of Things (IoT) devices and applications will need to match a use case as well. IoT device asset data will be useful to track within an asset database but may have limited value to add to a CMDB. If there are connections between IoT applications and data warehouses, the dependencies should likely be mapped to ensure continued dataflow.

Out of scope

A single source of data is highly beneficial, but don't make it a catchall for items that are not easily stored in a CMDB.

Source code should be stored in a definitive media library (DML). Code can be linked to the CMDB but is generally too big to store in a CMDB and will reduce performance for data retrieval.

Knowledge articles and maintenance checklists are better suited to a knowledge base. They can also be linked to the CDMB if needed but this can get messy where many-to-many relationships between articles and CIs exist.

Fleet (transportation) assets and fixed assets should be in fleet management systems and accounting systems, respectively. Storing these types of data in the CMDB doesn't provide value to the support process.

1.1.3 Brainstorm and prioritize use cases

Which IT practices will you supercharge?

Focus on improving both operations and strategy.

  1. Brainstorm the list of relevant use cases. What do you want to do with the data from the CMDB? Consider:
    1. ITSM management and governance practices
    2. IT operations, vendor orchestration, and service integration and management (SIAM) to improve vendor interactions
    3. IT finance and business service reporting needs
  2. Identify which use cases are part of your two- to three-year plan, including the purpose for adding configuration data into that process. Prioritize one or two of these use cases to accomplish in your first year.
  3. Identify dependencies to manage as part of the solution and define a realistic timeline for implementing integrations, modules, or data sources.
  4. Document this table in the Configuration Management Project Charter, section 2.2: Use Cases.
Audience Use Case Goal/Purpose Project/Solution Dependencies Proposed Timeline Priority
  • IT
  • Change Management

Stabilize the process by seeing:

Change conflict reporting

Reports of CI changes without change records

System availability

RFC mapping requires discovered CIs

RFC review requires criticality, technical and business owners

Conflict reporting requires dependency mapping

  • Discovery and manual information entered by October
  • Dependency mapping implemented by December

High

Determine what additional data will be needed to achieve your use cases

Regardless of which use cases you are planning to fulfill with the CMDB, it is critical to not add data and complexity with the plan of resolving every possible inquiry. Ensure the cost and effort of bringing in the data and maintaining it is justified. The complexity of the environment will impact the complexity of data sources and integrations for discovery and dependency mapping.

Before bringing in new data, consider:

  • Is this information available in other maintained databases now?
  • Will this data be critical for decision making? If it is nice to have or optional, can it be automatically moved into the database and maintained using existing integrations?
  • Is there a cost to bringing the data into the CMDB and maintaining it? Is that cost reasonable for its purpose?
  • How frequently will this information be accessed, and can it be updated in an adequate cadence to meet these needs?
  • When does this information need to be available?

Info-Tech Insight

If data will be used only occasionally upon request, determine if it will be more efficient to maintain it or to retrieve it from the CMDB or another data source as needed.

Remember, within the data sets, service configuration models can be used for:

  • Impact analysis
  • Cause and effect analysis
  • Risk analysis
  • Cost allocation
  • Availability analysis and planning

1.1.4 Expand your use cases by identifying the data needed to reach your goals

Involve stakeholders.

Allot 60 minutes for this discussion.

Review use cases and their goals.

Identify what data will be required to meet those goals and determine whether it will be mandatory or optional/nice-to-have information.

Identify sources of data for each type of data. Color code or sort.

Italicize data points that can be automatically discovered.

Gain consensus on what information will be manually entered.

Record the data in the Use Cases and Data Worksheet.

Download the Use Cases and Data Worksheet

Input

Output

  • None
  • List of data requirements
MaterialsParticipants
  • Whiteboard/flip charts
  • Sticky notes
  • Markers/pens
  • Use Cases and Data Worksheet
  • IT and business service owners
  • Business/customer relationship managers
  • Practice owners and managers
  • SCM practice manager
  • SCM project sponsor

Use discovery and dependency mapping tools to automatically update the CMDB

Avoid manual data entry whenever possible.

Consider these features when looking at tools:

  • Application dependency mapping: Establishing and tracking the relationships and dependencies between system components, applications, and IT services. The ideal tool will be able to generate maps automatically.
  • Agentless and agent discovery: Scanning systems with both agent and agentless approaches. Agent-based scanning provides comprehensive information on applications used in individual endpoints, which is helpful in minimizing its IT footprint. However, agents require endpoint access. Agentless-based scanning provides a broader and holistic view of deployed applications without the need to install an agent on end devices, which can be good enough for inventory awareness.
  • Data export capability: Easy exporting of application inventory information to be used in reports and other tools.
  • Dashboards and chart visualization: Detailed list of the application inventory, including version number, number of users, licenses, deployment location, and other application details. These details will inform decision makers of each application's health and its candidacy for further rationalization activities.
  • Customizable scanning scripts: Tailor your application discovery approach by modifying the scripts used to scan your systems.
  • Integration with third-party tools: Easy integration with other systems with out-of-the-box plugins or customizable APIs.

Determine which data collection methods will be used to populate the CMDB

The effort-to-value ratio is an important factor in populating a CMDB. Manual efforts require a higher process focus, more intensive data validation, and a constant need to remind team members to act on every change.

Real-Time Data AIOps continual scans Used for event and incident management
Near Real-Time Data Discovery and dependency mapping run on a regular cycle Used for change and asset management
Historical Data Activity log imports, manual data entry Used for IT finance, audit trail
  • Determine what amount of effort is appropriate for each data grouping and use case. As decisions are made to expand data within the CMDB, the effort-to-value ratio should always factor in. To be usable, data must be accurate, and every piece of data that needs to be manually entered runs the risk of becoming obsolete.
  • Identify which data sources will bring in each type of data. Where there is a possibility of duplicate records being created, one of the data sources will need to be identified as the primary.
  • If the decision is to manually enter configuration items early in the process, be aware that automation may create duplicates of the CIs that will need to be deduplicated at some point in the process to make the information more usable.
  • Typically, items are discovered, validated, then mapped, but there will be variations depending on the source.
  • Active Directory or LDAP may be used to bring users and technicians into the CMDB. Data may be imported from spreadsheets. Identify efforts where data cleanup may have to happen before transferring into the CMDB.
  • Identify how often manual imports will need to be conducted to make sure data is usable.

Identify other nondiscoverable data that will need to be added to or accessed by the CMDB

Foundational data, such as technicians, end users and approvers, roles, location, company, agency, department, building, or cost center, may be added to tables that are within or accessed by the CMDB. Work with your vendor to understand structure and where this information resides.

  • These records can be imported from CSV files manually, but this will require manual removal or edits as information changes.
  • Integration with the HRIS, Active Directory, or LDAP will enable automatic updates through synchronization or scheduled imports.
  • If synchronization is fully enabled, new data can be added and removed from the CMDB automatically.
  • Identify which nondiscoverable attributes will be needed, such as system criticality, support groups, groups it is managed by, location.
  • If partially automating the process, identify where manual updates will need to occur.
  • If fully automating the process, notifications will need to be set up when business owner or product or technical owner fields become empty to prompt defining a replacement within the CMDB.
  • Determine who will manage these updates.
  • Work with your CMDB implementation vendor to determine the best option for bringing this information in.

1.1.5 Record required data sources

Allot 15 minutes for this discussion.

  1. Where do you track the work involved in providing services? Typically, your ticket database tracks service requests and incidents. Additional data sources can include:
    • Enterprise resource planning tools for tracking purchase orders
    • Project management information system for tracking tasks
  2. What trusted data sources exist for the technology that supports these services? Examples include:
    • Management tools (e.g. Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager)
    • Architectural diagrams and network topology diagrams
    • IT asset management database
    • Spreadsheets
    • Other systems of record
  3. What other data sources can help you gather the data you identified in activity 1.1.4?
  4. Record the relevant data sources for each use case in the Configuration Management Standard Operating Procedures, section 6: Data Collection and Updates.

Info-Tech Insight

Improve the trustworthiness of your CMDB as a system of record by relying on data that is already trusted.

Input

Output

  • Use cases
  • List of data requirements
MaterialsParticipants
  • Use Cases and Data Worksheet
  • Configuration Management Standard Operating Procedures
  • IT and business service owners
  • Practice owners and managers
  • SCM practice manager
  • SCM project sponsor

Step 1.2

Define roles and responsibilities

Activities

1.2.1 Record the project team and stakeholders

1.2.2 Complete a RACI chart to define who will be accountable and responsible for configuration tasks

This step will walk you through the following aspects of a configuration management system:

  • Roles and responsibilities

This phase involves the following participants:

  • IT service owners
  • Enterprise architects
  • Practice owners and managers
  • SCM practice manager
  • Project manager

Identify the roles you need in your SCM project

Determine which roles will need to be involved in the initial project and how to source these roles.

Leadership Roles
Oversee the SCM implementation

  1. Configuration Manager – The practice owner for SCM. This is a long-term role.
  2. Configuration Control Board (CCB) Chair – An optional role that oversees proposed alterations to configuration plans. If a CCB is implemented, this is a long-term role.
  3. Project Sponsor or Program Sponsor – Provides the necessary resources for building the CMDB and SCM practices.
  4. Architecture Roles
    Plan the program to build strong foundation
    1. Configuration Management Architect – Technical leader who defines the overall CM solution, plans the scope, selects a tool, and leads the technical team that will implement the solution.
    2. Requirements Analyst – Gathers and manages the requirements for CM.
    3. Process Engineer – Defines, documents, and implements the entire process.

Architecture Roles
Plan the program to build strong foundation

  1. Configuration Management Architect – Technical leader who defines the overall CM solution, plans the scope, selects a tool, and leads the technical team that will implement the solution.
  2. Requirements Analyst – Gathers and manages the requirements for CM.
  3. Process Engineer – Defines, documents, and implements the entire process.

Engineer Roles
Implement the system

  1. Logical Database Analyst (DBA) Designs the structure to hold the configuration management data and oversees implementation.
  2. Communications and Trainer – Communicates the goals and functions of CM and teaches impacted users the how and why of the process and tools.

Administrative Roles
Permanent roles involving long-term ownership

  1. Technical Owner – The system administrator responsible for their system's uptime. These roles usually own the data quality for their system.
  2. Configuration Management Integrator – Oversees regular transfer of data into the CMDB.
  3. Configuration Management Tool Support – Selects, installs, and maintains the CM tool.
  4. Impact Manager – Analyzes configuration data to ensure relationships between CIs are accurate; conducts impact analysis.

1.2.1 Record the project team and stakeholders

Allocate 25 minutes to this discussion.

  1. Record the project team.
    1. Identify the project manager who will lead this project.
    2. Identify key personnel that will need to be involved in design of the configuration management system and processes.
    3. Identify where vendors/outsourcers may be required to assist with technical aspects.
    4. Document the project team in the Configuration Management Project Charter, section 1.1: Project Team.
  1. Record a list of stakeholders.
    1. Identify stakeholders internal and external to IT.
    2. Build the stakeholder profile. For each stakeholder, identify their role, interest in the project, and influence on project success. You can score these criteria high/medium/low or score them out of ten.
    3. If managed service providers will need to be part of the equation, determine who will be the liaison and how they will provide or access data.
Input

Output

  • Project team members
  • Project plan resources
MaterialsParticipants
  • Configuration Management Project Charter
  • List of project stakeholders and participants
  • IT service owners
  • Practice owners and managers
  • SCM practice manager
  • SCM project sponsor

Even with full automation, this cannot be a "set it and forget it" project if it is to be successful long-term

Create a team to manage the process and data updates and to ensure data is always usable.

  • Services may be added and removed.
  • Technology will change as technical debt is reduced.
  • Vendors may change as contract needs develop.
  • Additional use cases may be introduced by IT and the business as approaches to management evolve.
  • AIOps can reduce the level of effort and improve visibility as configuration items change from the baseline and notifications are automated.
  • Changes can be checked against requests for changes through automated reconciliations, but changes will still need to be investigated where they do not meet expectations.
  • Manual data changes will need to be made regularly and verified.

"We found that everyone wanted information from the CMDB, but no one wanted to pay to maintain it. People pointed to the configuration management team and said, 'It's their responsibility.'

Configuration managers, however, cannot own the data because they have no way of knowing if the data is accurate. They can own the processes related to checking accuracy, but not the data itself."
– Tim Mason, founding director at TRM Associates
(Excerpt from Viewpoint: Focus on CMDB Leadership)

Include these roles in your CMDB practice to ensure continued success and continual improvement

These roles can make up the configuration control board (CCB) to make decisions on major changes to services, data models, processes, or policies. A CCB will be necessary in complex environments.

Configuration Manager

This role is focused on ensuring everyone works together to build the CMDB and keep it up to date. The configuration manager is responsible to:

  • Plan and manage the standards, processes, and procedures and communicate all updates to appropriate staff. Focused on continual improvement.
  • Plan and manage population of the CMDB and ensure data included meets criteria for cost effectiveness and reasonable effort for the value it brings.
  • Validate scope of services and CIs to be included and controlled within the CMDB and manage exceptions.
  • Audit data quality to ensure it is valid, is current, and meets defined standards.
  • Evaluate and recommend tools to support processes, data collection, and integrations.
  • Ensure configuration management processes interface with all other service and business management functions to meet use cases.
  • Report on configuration management performance and take appropriate action on process adherence and quality issues.

Configuration Librarian

This role is most important where manual data entry is prevalent and where many nonstandard configurations are in place. The librarian role is often held by the tool administrator. The librarian focuses specifically on data within the CMDB, including:

  • Manual updates to configuration data.
  • CMDB data verification on a regular schedule.
  • Processing ad hoc requests for data.

Product/Service/Technical Owners

The product or technical owner will validate information is correctly updating and reflects the existing data requirements as new systems are provisioned or as existing systems change.

Interfacing Practice Owners

All practice owners, such as change manager, incident manager, or problem manager, must work with the configuration team to ensure data is usable for each of the use cases they are responsible for.

Download the Configuration Manager job description

Assign configuration management responsibilities and accountabilities

Align authority and accountability.

  • A RACI exercise will help you discuss and document accountability and responsibility for critical configuration management activities.
  • When responsibility and accountability are not well documented, it's often useful to invite a representative of the roles identified to participate in this alignment exercise. The discussion can uncover contrasting views on responsibility and governance, which can help you build a stronger management and governance model.
  • The RACI chart can help you identify who should be involved when making changes to a given activity. Clarify the variety of responsibilities assigned to each key role.
  • In the future, you may need to define roles in more detail as you change your configuration management procedures.

Responsible: The person who actually gets the job done.
Different roles may be responsible for different aspects of the activity relevant to their role.

Accountable: The one role accountable for the activity (in terms of completion, quality, cost, etc.)
Must have sufficient authority to be held accountable; responsible roles are often accountable to this role.

Consulted: Those who need the opportunity to provide meaningful input at certain points in the activity; typically, subject matter experts or stakeholders. The more people you must consult, the more overhead and time you'll add to a process.

Informed: Those who receive information regarding the task but do not need to provide feedback.
Information might relate to process execution, changes, or quality.

Complete a RACI chart to define who will be accountable and responsible for configuration tasks

Determine what roles will be in place in your organization and who will fulfill them, and create your RACI chart to reflect what makes sense for your organization. Additional roles may be involved where there is complexity.

R = responsible, A = accountable, C = consulted, I = informed CCB Configuration Manager Configuration Librarian Technical Owner(s) Interfacing Practice Owners Tool Administrator
Plan and manage the standards, processes, and procedures and communicate all updates to appropriate staff. Focused on continual improvement. A R
Plan and manage population of the CMDB and ensure data included meets criteria for cost effectiveness and reasonable effort for the value it brings. A R
Validate scope of services and CIs to be included and controlled within the CMDB and manage exceptions. A R
Audit data quality to ensure it is valid, is current, and meets defined standards. A,R
Evaluate and recommend tools to support processes, data collection, and integrations. A,R
Ensure configuration management processes interface with all other service and business management functions to meet use cases. A
Report on configuration management performance and take appropriate action on process adherence and quality issues. A
Make manual updates to configuration data. A
Conduct CMDB data verification on a regular schedule. A
Process ad hoc requests for data. A
Enter new systems into the CMDB. A R
Update CMDB as systems change. A R
Identify new use cases for CMDB data. R A
Validate data meets the needs for use cases and quality. R A
Design reports to meet use cases. R
Ensure integrations are configured as designed and are functional. R

1.2.2 Complete a RACI chart to define who will be accountable and responsible for configuration tasks

Allot 60 minutes for this discussion.

  1. Open the Configuration Management Standard Operating Procedures, section 4.1: Responsibility Matrix. In the RACI chart, review the top row of roles. Smaller organizations may not need a configuration control board, in which case the configuration manager may have more authority.
  2. Modify or expand the process tasks in the left column as needed.
  3. For each role, identify what that person is responsible for, accountable for, consulted on, or informed of. Fill out each column.
  4. Document in the SOP. Schedule a time to share the results with organization leads.
  5. Distribute the chart among all teams in your organization.
  6. Describe additional roles as needed in the documentation.
  7. Add accountabilities and responsibilities for the CCB into the Configuration Control Board Charter.
  8. If appropriate, add auxiliary roles to the Configuration Management Standard Operating Procedures, section 4.2: Configuration Management Auxiliary Role Definitions.

Notes:

  1. Assign one Accountable for each task.
  2. Have one or more Responsible for each task.
  3. Avoid generic responsibilities such as "team meetings."
  4. Keep your RACI definitions in your documents for quick reference.

Refer back to the RACI chart when building out the communications plan to ensure accountable and responsible team members are on board and consulted and informed people are aware of all changes.

Input

Output

  • Task assignments
  • RACI chart with roles and responsibilities
MaterialsParticipants
  • Configuration Management Standard Operating Procedures, RACI chart
  • Configuration Control Board Charter, Responsibilities section
  • IT service owners
  • Practice owners and managers
  • SCM practice manager
  • SCM project sponsor

Phase 2

Configuration Management Data Model

StrategyData StructureProcessesRoadmap
  • Challenges and Goals
  • Use Cases and Data
  • Roles and Responsibilities
  • Services
  • Classifications
  • Data Modeling
  • Lifecycle Processes
  • Baselines
  • Audit and Data Validation
  • Metrics
  • Communications Plan
  • Roadmap

This phase will walk you through the following aspects of a configuration management system:

  • Data Model
  • Customer-Facing and Supporting Services
  • Business Capabilities
  • Relationships
  • IT Infrastructure Components
  • Enterprise Software
  • End-User Devices
  • Documents

This phase involves the following participants:

  • IT service owners
  • Enterprise architects
  • Practice owners and managers
  • CM practice manager
  • CM project manager

Step 2.1

Build a framework for CIs and relationships

Activities

Document services:

2.1.1 Define and prioritize your services

2.1.2 Test configuration items against existing categories

2.1.3 Create a configuration control board charter to define the board's responsibilities and protocols

This step will walk you through the following aspects of a configuration management system:

  • Data model
  • Configuration items
  • Relationships

This phase involves the following participants:

  • IT service owners
  • Enterprise architects
  • Practice owners and managers
  • CM practice manager
  • Project manager

Making sense of data daily will be key to maintaining it, starting with services

As CIs are discovered and mapped, they will automatically map to each other based on integrations, APIs, queries, and transactions. However, CIs also need to be mapped to a conceptional model or service to present the service and its many layers in an easily consumable way.

These services will need to be manually created or imported into the CMDB and manually connected to the application services. Services can be mapped to technical or business services or both.

If business services reporting has been requested, talk to the business to develop a list of services that will be required. Use terms the business will be expecting and identify which applications and instances will be mapped to those services.

If IT is using the CMDB to support service usage and reporting, develop the list of IT services and identify which applications and instances will be mapped to those services.

This image show the relationship between Discoverable and Nondiscoverable CIs. The discoverable CIs are coloured in purple, and the nondiscoverables are blue.

Work with your stakeholders to ensure catalog items make sense to them

There isn't a definitive right or wrong way to define catalog items. For example, the business and IT could both reference application servers, but only IT may need to see technical services broken down by specific locations or device types.

Refer back to your goals and use cases to think through how best to meet those objectives and determine how to categorize your services.

Define the services that will be the top-level, nondiscoverable services, which will group together the CIs that make up the complete service. Identify which application(s) will connect into the technical service.

When you are ready to start discovery, this list of services will be connected to the discovered data to organize it in a way that makes sense for how your stakeholders need to see the data.

While working toward meeting the goals of the first few use cases, you will want to keep the structure simple. Once processes are in place and data is regularly validated, complexities of different service types and names can be integrated into the data.

This image show the relationship between Discoverable and Nondiscoverable CIs. Both Discoverable and nondiscoverable CIs are blue.

Application Service(blue); Technical Service(Purple); IT Shared Services(Orange); Billable Services(green); Service Portfolio(red)

Define the service types to manage within the CMDB to logically group CIs

Determine which method of service groupings will best serve your audience for your prioritized use cases. This will help to name your service categories. Service types can be added as the CMDB evolves and as the audience changes.

Application Service

Technical Service

IT Shared Services

Billable Services

Service Portfolio

A set of interconnected applications and hosts configured to offer a service to the organization.

Example: Financial application service, which may include email, web server, application server, databases, and middleware.

A logical grouping of CIs based on common criteria.

Example: Toronto web services, which may include several servers, web applications, and databases.

A logical grouping of IT and business services shared and used across the organization.

Example: VoIP/phone services or networking or security services.

A group of services that will be billed out to departments or customers and would require logical groupings to enable invoicing.

A group of business and technical service offerings with specific performance reporting levels. This may include multiple service levels for different customer audiences for the same service.

2.1.1 Define and prioritize your services

Prioritize your starting point. If multiple audiences need to be accommodated, work with one group at a time.

Timing: will vary depending on number of services, and starting point

  1. Create your list of services, referencing an existing service catalog, business continuity or disaster recovery plan, list of applications, or brainstorming sessions. Use the terminology that makes the most sense for the audience and their reporting requirements.
  2. If this list is already in place, assess for relevance and reduce the list to only those services that will be managed through the CMDB.
  3. Determine what data will be relevant for each service based on the exercises done in 1.1.4 and 1.1.5. For example, if priority was a required attribute for use case data, ensure each service lists the priority of that service.
  4. For each of these, identify the supporting services. These items can come from your technical service catalog or list of systems and software.
  5. Document this table in the Use Cases and Data Worksheet, tab 3: Service Catalog.

Service Record Example

Service: Email
Supporting Services: M365, Authentication Services

Service Attributes

Availability: 24/7 (99.999%)
Priority: Critical
Users: All
Used for: Collaboration
Billable: Departmental
Support: Unified Support Model, Account # 123456789

The CMDB will be organized by services and will enable data analysis through multiple categorization schemes

To extract maximum service management benefit from a CMDB, the highest level of CI type should be a service, as demonstrated below. While it is easier to start at the system or single-asset level, taking the service mapping approach will provide you with a useful and dynamic view of your IT environment as it relates to the services you offer, instead of a static inventory of components.

Level 1: Services

  • Business Service Offering: A business service is an IT service that supports a business process, or a service that is delivered to business customers. Business service offerings typically are bound by service-level agreements.
  • IT Service Offering: An IT service supports the customer's business processes and is made up of people, processes, and technology. IT service offerings typically are bound by service-level agreements.

Level 2: Infrastructure CIs

  • IT Component Set: An IT service offering consists of one of more sets of IT components. An IT component set allows you to group or bundle IT components with other components or groupings.
  • IT Component: An IT system is composed of one or more supporting components. Many components are shared between multiple IT systems.

Level 3: Supporting CIs

  • IT Subcomponent: Any IT asset that is uniquely identifiable and a component of an IT system.
  • IT components can have subcomponents, and those components can have subcomponents, etc.

Two charts, showing Enterprise Architect Model and Configuration Service Model. Each box represents a different CI.

Assess your CMDB's standard category offerings against your environment, with a plan to minimize customization

Standard categorization schemes will allow for easier integration with multiple tools and reporting and improve results if using machine learning to automate categorization. If the CMDB chosen includes structured categories, use that as your starting point and focus only on gaps that are not addressed for CIs unique to your environment.

There is an important distinction between a class and a type. This concept is foundational for your configuration data model, so it is important that you understand it.

  • Types are general groupings, and the things within a type will have similarities. For attributes that you want to collect on a type, all children classes and CIs will have those attribute fields.
  • Classes are a more specific grouping within a type. All objects within a class will have specific similarities. You can also use subclasses to further differentiate between CIs.
  • Individual CIs are individual instances of a class or subclass. All objects in a class will have the same attribute fields and behave the same, although the values of their attributes will likely differ.
  • Attributes may be discovered or nondiscoverable and manually added to CIs. The attributes are properties of the CI such as serial number, version, memory, processor speed, or asset tag.

Use inheritance structures to simplify your configuration data model.

An example CM Data Model is depicted.

Assess the list of classes of configuration items against your requirements

Types are general groupings, and the things within a type will have similarities. Each type will have its own table within the CMDB. Classes within a type are a more specific grouping of configuration items and may include subclasses.

Review your vendor's CMDB documentation. Find the list of CI types or classes. Most CMDBs will have a default set of classes, like this standard list. If you need to build your own, use the table below as a starting point. Define anything required for unique classes. Create a list and consult with your installation partner.

Sample list of classes organized by type

Types Services Network Hardware Storage Compute App Environment Documents
Classes
  • Application Service
  • Technical Service
  • IT Shared Service
  • Billable Service
  • Service Portfolio
  • Switch
  • Router
  • Firewall
  • Modem
  • SD-WAN
  • Load Balancer
  • UPS
  • Computer
  • Laptop
  • Server
  • Tablet
  • Database
  • Network-Attached Storage
  • Storage Array Network
  • Blob
  • Operating System
  • Hypervisor
  • Virtual Server
  • Virtual Desktop
  • Appliance
  • Virtual Application
  • Enterprise Application
  • Line of Business Application Software
  • Development
  • Test
  • Production
  • Contract
  • Business Impact Analysis
  • Requirements

Review relationships to determine which ones will be most appropriate to map your dependencies

Your CMDB should include multiple relationship types. Determine which ones will be most effective for your environment and ensure everyone is trained on how to use them. As CIs are mapped, verify they are correct and only manually map what is incorrect or not mapping through automation.

Manually mapping CMDB relationships may be time consuming and prone to error, but where manual mapping needs to take place, ensure the team has a common view of the dependency types available and what is important to map.

Use automated mapping whenever possible to improve accuracy, provide functional visualizations, and enable dynamic updates as the environment changes.

Where a dependency maps to external providers, determine where it makes sense to discover and map externally provided CIs.

  • Only connect where there is value in mapping to vendor-owned systems.
  • Only connect where data and connections can be trusted and verified.

Most common dependency mapping types

A list of the most common dependency mapping types.

2.1.2 Test configuration items against existing categories

Time to complete: 1-2 hours

  1. Select a service to test.
  2. Identify the various components that make up the service, focusing on configuration items, not attributes
  3. Categorize configuration items against types and classes in the default settings of the CMDB.
  4. Using the default relationships within the CMDB, identify the relationships between the configuration items.
  5. Identify types, classes, and relationships that do not fit within the default settings. Determine if there are common terms for these items or determine most appropriate name.
  6. Validate these exceptions with the publisher.
  7. Document exceptions in the Configuration Management Standard Operating Procedures, Appendix 2: Types and Classes of Configuration Items
Input

Output

  • List of default settings for classes, types, and relationships
  • Small list of services for testing
  • List of CIs to map to at least one service
  • List of categories to add to the CMDB solution.
MaterialsParticipants
  • Use Cases and Data Worksheet
  • Configuration Management Standard Operating Procedures
  • IT service owners
  • Practice owners and managers
  • SCM practice manager
  • SCM project sponsor

2.1.3 Create a configuration control board charter to define the board's responsibilities and protocols

A charter will set the tone for meetings, ensure purpose is defined and meeting cadence is set for regular reviews.

  1. Open the Configuration Control Board Charter. Review the document and modify as appropriate for your CCB. This will include:
    • Purpose and mandate of the committee – Reference objectives from the project charter.
    • Team composition – Determine the right mix of team members. A team of six to ten people can provide a good balance between having a variety of opinions and getting work done.
    • Voting option – Determine the right quorum to approve changes.
    • Responsibilities – List responsibilities, starting with RACI chart items.
    • Authority – Define the control board's span of control.
    • Governing laws and regulations – List any regulatory requirements that will need to be met to satisfy your auditors.
    • Meeting preparation – Set expectations to ensure meetings are productive.
  2. Distribute the charter to CCB members.
Input

Output

  • Project team members
  • Project plan resources
MaterialsParticipants
  • Configuration Control Board Charter
  • IT service owners
  • Practice owners and managers
  • SCM practice manager
  • SCM project sponsor

Assess the default list of statuses for each state

Align this list with your CMDB

Minimize the number of customizations that will make it difficult to update the platform.

  1. Review the default status list within the tool.
  2. Identify which statuses will be most used. Write a definition for each status.
  3. Update this list as you update process documentation in Step 3.1. After initial implementation, this list should only be modified through change enablement.
  4. Record this list of statuses in the Configuration Management Standard Operating Procedures, Appendix 4: Statuses
State Status Description
Preparation Ordered Waiting delivery from the vendor
In Planning Being created
Received Vendor has delivered the item, but it is not ready for deployment
Production In Stock Available to be deployed
In Use Deployed
On Loan Deployed to a user on a temporary basis
For Removal Planning to be phased out but still deployed to an end user
Offline In Transit Moving to a new location
Under Maintenance Temporarily offline while a patch or change is applied
Removed Decommissioned Item has been retired and is no longer in production
Disposed Item has been destroyed and we are no longer in possession of it
Lost Item has been lost
Stolen Item has been stolen

Step 2.2

Document statuses, attributes, and data sources

Activities

2.2.1 Follow the packet and map out the in-scope services and data centers

2.2.2 Build data model diagrams

2.2.3 Determine access rights for your data

This step will walk you through the following aspects of a configuration management system:

  • Statuses
  • Attributes for each class of CI

This phase involves the following participants:

  • IT service owners
  • Enterprise architects
  • Practice owners and managers
  • SCM practice manager
  • Project manager

Outcomes of this step

  • Framework for approaching CI statuses
  • Attributes for each class of CI
  • Data sources for those attributes

Service mapping approaches

As you start thinking about dependency mapping, it's important to understand the different methods and how they work, as well as your CMDB's capabilities. These approaches may be all in the same tool, or the tool may only have the top-down options.

Top down, most common

Pattern-based

Most common option, which includes indicators of connections such as code, access rights, scripting, host discovery, and APIs.

Start with pattern-based, then turn on traffic-based for more detail. This combination will provide the most accuracy.

Traffic-based

Map against traffic patterns involving connection rules to get more granular than pattern-based.

Traffic-based can add a lot of overhead with extraneous data, so you may not want to run it continuously.

Tag-based

Primarily used for cloud, containers, and virtual machines and will attach the cloud licenses to their dependent services and any related CIs.

Tags work well with cloud but will not have the same hierarchical view as on-premises dependency mapping.

Machine learning

Machine learning will look for patterns in the traffic-based connections, match CIs to categories and help organize the data.

Machine learning (ML) may not be in every solution, but if you have it, use it. ML will provide many suggestions to make the life of the data manager easier.

Model hierarchy

Automated data mapping will be helpful, but it won't be foolproof. It's critical to understand the data model to validate and map nondiscoverable CIs correctly.

The framework consists of the business, enterprise, application, and implementation layers.

The business layer encodes real-world business concepts via the conceptual model.

The enterprise layer defines all enterprise data assets' details and their relationships.

The application layer defines the data structures as used by a specific application.

The implementation layer defines the data models and artifacts for use by software tools.

An example of Model Hierarchy is depicted.

Learn how to create data models with Info-Tech's blueprint Create and Manage Enterprise Data Models

2.2.1 Follow the packet and map out the in-scope services and data centers

Reference your network topology and architecture diagrams.

Allot 1 hour for this activity.

  1. Start with a single service that is well understood and documented.
  2. Identify the technical components (hardware and applications) that make up the service.
  3. Determine if there is a need to further break down services into logical service groupings. For example, the email service to the right is broken down into authentication and mail flow.
  4. If you don't have a network diagram to follow, create a simple one to identify workflows within the service and components the service uses.
  5. Record the apps and underlying components in the Configuration Management Standard Operating Procedures, Appendix 1: Configuration Data Model Structure.

This information will be used for CM project planning and validating the contents of the CMDB.

an example of a Customer-facing service is shown, for Email sample topology.

Download the Configuration Management Diagram Template Library to see an example.

Build your configuration data model

Rely on out-of-the-box functionality where possible and keep a narrow focus in the early implementation stages.

  1. If you have an enterprise architecture, then your configuration management data model should align with it.
  2. Keep a narrow focus in the early implementation stages. Don't fill up your CMDB until you are ready to validate and fix the data.
  3. Rely on out-of-the-box (OOTB) functionality where possible. If your configuration management database (CMDB) and platform do not have a data model OOTB, then rely on a publicly available data model.
  4. Map your business or IT service offering to the first few layers.

Once this is built out in the system, you can let the automated dependency mapping take over, but you will still need to validate the accuracy of the automated mapping and investigate anything that is incorrect.

Sample Configuration Data Model

Every box represents a CI, and every line represents a relationship

A sample configuration Data model is shown.

Example: Data model and CMDB visualization

Once the data model is entered into the CMDB, it will provide a more dynamic and complex view, including CIs shared with other services.

An example of a Data Model Exercise

CMDB View

An example of a CMDB View of the Data Model Exercise

2.2.2 Build data model diagrams

Visualize the expected CI classes and relationships.

Allot 45 minutes.

  1. Identify the different data model views you need. Use multiple diagrams to keep the information simple to read and understand. Common diagrams include:
    1. Network level: Outline expected CI classes and relationships at the network level.
    2. Application level: Outline the expected components and relationships that make up an application.
    3. Services level: Outline how business capability CIs and service CIs relate to each other and to other types of CIs.
  1. Use boxes to represent CI classes.
  2. Use lines to represent relationships. Include details such as:
    1. Relationship name: Write this name on the arrow.
    2. Direction: Have an arrow point to each child.

Review samples in Configuration Management Diagram Template Library.
Record these diagrams in the Configuration Management Standard Operating Procedures, Appendix 1: Configuration Data Model Structure.

Input

Output

  • List of default settings for classes, types, and relationships
  • Small list of services for testing
  • List of CIs to map to at least one service
  • List of additions of categories to add to the CMDB solution.
MaterialsParticipants
  • Configuration Management Standard Operating Procedures
  • Configuration Management Diagram Template Library
  • IT service owners
  • Practice owners and managers
  • SCM practice manager
  • SCM project sponsor

Download the Configuration Management Diagram Template Library to see examples.

Determine governance for data security, access, and validation

Align CMDB access to the organization's access control policy to maintain authorized and secure access for legitimate staff performing their role.

Data User Type Access Role
Data consumers
  • View-only access
  • Will need to view and use the data but will not need to make modifications to it
  • Service desk
  • Change manager
  • Major incident manager
  • Finance
CMDB owner
  • Read/write access with the ability to update and validate data as needed
  • Configuration manager
Domain owner
  • Read/write access for specific domains
  • Data owner within their domain, which includes validating that data is in the database and that it is correctly categorized.
  • Enterprise architect
  • Application owner
Data provider
  • Read/write access for specific domains
  • Ensures automated data has been added and adds nondiscoverable assets and attributes as needed
  • Server operations
  • Database management
  • Network teams
CMDB administrator
  • View-only access for data
  • Will need to have access for modifying the structure of the product, including adding fields, as determined by the CCB
  • ITSM tool administrator

2.2.3 Determine access rights for your data

Allot 30 minutes for this discussion.

  1. Open the Configuration Management Standard Operating Procedures, section 5: Access Rights.
  2. Review the various roles from an access perspective.
    1. Who needs read-only access?
    2. Who needs read/write access?
    3. Should there be restrictions on who can delete data?
  1. Fill in the chart and communicate this to your CMDB installation vendor or your CMDB administrator.
Input

Output

  • Task assignments
  • Access rights and roles
MaterialsParticipants
  • Configuration Management Standard Operating Procedures
  • IT service owners
  • Practice owners and managers
  • SCM practice manager
  • SCM project sponsor

Phase 3

Configuration Record Updates

StrategyData StructureProcessesRoadmap
  • Challenges and Goals
  • Use Cases and Data
  • Roles and Responsibilities
  • Services
  • Classifications
  • Data Modeling
  • Lifecycle Processes
  • Baselines
  • Audit and Data Validation
  • Metrics
  • Communications Plan
  • Roadmap

This phase will walk you through the following aspects of a configuration management system:

  • ITSM Practices and Workflows
  • Discovery and Dependency Mapping Tools
  • Auditing and Data Validation Practices

This phase involves the following participants:

  • IT service owners
  • Enterprise architects
  • Practice owners and managers
  • SCM practice manager
  • SCM project manager
  • IT audit

Harness Service Configuration Management Superpowers

Step 3.1

Keep CIs and relationships up to date through lifecycle process integrations

Activities

3.1.1 Define processes to bring new services into the CMDB

3.1.2 Determine when each type of CI will be created in the CMDB

3.1.3 Identify when each type of CI will be retired in the CMDB

3.1.4 Record when and how attributes will change

3.1.5 Institute configuration control and configuration baselines

This step will walk you through the following aspects of a configuration management system:

  1. ITSM Practices and Workflows
  2. Discovery and Dependency Mapping Tools

This phase involves the following participants:

  1. IT service owners
  2. Enterprise architects
  3. Practice owners and managers
  4. SCM practice manager
  5. Project manager

Outcomes of this step

  • List of action items for updating interfacing practices and processes
  • Identification of where configuration records will be manually updated

Incorporate CMDB updates into IT operations

Determine which processes will prompt changes to the CMDB data

Onboard new services - Offboard Redundant Services. Onboard new CIs - Offboard Redundant CIs; Maintain CIs - Update Attributes.

Change enablement

Identify which process are involved in each stage of data input, maintenance, and removal to build out a process for each scenario.

Project management

Change enablement

Asset management

Security controls

Project management

Incident management

Deployment management

Change enablement

Asset management

Security controls

Project management

Incident management

Service management

Formalize the process for adding new services to the CMDB

As new services and products are introduced into the environment, you can improve your ability to correctly cost the service, design integrations, and ensure all operational capabilities are in place, such as data backup and business continuity plans.
In addition, attributes such as service-level agreements (SLAs), availability requirements, and product, technical, and business owners should be documented as soon as those new systems are made live.

  • Introduce the technical team and CCB to the product early to ensure the service record is created before deployment and to quickly map the services once they are moved into the production environment.
  • Engage with project managers or business analysts to define the process to include security and technical reviews early.
  • Engage with the security and technical reviewers to start documenting the service as soon as it is approved.
  • Determine which practices will be involved in the creation and approval of new services and formalize the process to streamline entry of the new service, onboarding corresponding CIs and mapping dependencies.

an example of the review and approval process for new service or products is shown.

3.1.1 Define processes to bring new services into the CMDB

Start with the most frequent intake methods, and if needed, use this opportunity to streamline the process.

  1. Discuss the methods for new services to be introduced to the IT environment.
  2. Critique existing methods to assess consistency and identify issues that could prevent the creation of services in the CMDB in a timely manner.
  3. Create a workflow for the existing processes, with an eye to improvement. Identify any changes that will need to be introduced and managed appropriately.
  4. Identify where additional groups may need to be engaged to ensure success. For example, if project managers are not interfacing early with IT, discuss process changes with them.
  5. Discuss the validation process and determine where control points are. Document these on the workflows.
  6. Complete the Configuration Management Standard Operating Procedures, section 8.1: Introduce New Service and Data Model.

Possible intake opportunities:

  • Business-driven project intake process
  • IT-driven project intake process
  • Change enablement reviews
  • Vendor-driven product changes
Input

Output

  • Discussion
  • Intake processes
MaterialsParticipants
  • Configuration Management Standard Operating Procedures
  • Configuration Management Diagram Template Library
  • Configuration control board
  • Configuration manager
  • Project sponsor
  • IT stakeholders

Identify scenarios where CIs are added and removed in the configuration management database

New CIs may be introduced with new services or may be introduced and removed as part of asset refreshes or through service restoration in incident management. Updates may be done by your own services team or a managed services provider.
Determine the various ways the CIs may be changed and test with various CI types.
Review attributes such as SLAs, availability requirements, and product, technical, and business owners to determine if changes are required.

  • Identify what will be updated automatically or manually. Automation could include discovery and dependency mapping or synchronization with AMDB or AIOps tools.
  • Engage with relevant program managers to define and validate processes.
  • Identify control points and review audit requirements.

An example of New or refresh CI from Procurement.

Info-Tech Insight

Data deemed no longer current may be archived or deleted. Retained data may be used for tracing lifecycle changes when troubleshooting or meeting audit obligations. Determine what types of CIs and use cases require archived data to meet data retention policies. If none do, deletion of old data may be appropriate.

3.1.2 Identify when each type of CI will be created in the CMDB

Allot 45 minutes for discussion.

  1. Discuss the various methods for new CIs to be introduced to the IT environment.
  2. Critique existing methods to assess consistency and identify issues that could prevent the creation of CIs in the CMDB in a timely manner.
  3. Create a workflow for the existing processes, with an eye to improvement. Identify any changes that will need to be introduced and managed appropriately.
  4. Identify where additional groups may need to be engaged to ensure success. For example, if project managers are not interfacing early with IT, discuss process changes with them.
  5. Discuss the validation process and determine where control points are. Document these on the workflows.
  6. Complete Configuration Management Standard Operating Procedures, section 8.2: Introduce New Configuration Items to the CMDB

Possible intake opportunities:

  • Business-driven project intake process
  • IT-driven project intake process
  • Change enablement reviews
  • Vendor-driven product changes
  • Incident management
  • Asset management, lifecycle refresh
Input

Output

  • Discussion
  • Retirement processes
MaterialsParticipants
  • Configuration Management Standard Operating Procedures
  • Configuration Management Diagram Template Library
  • Configuration control board
  • Configuration manager
  • Project sponsor
  • IT stakeholders

3.1.3 Identify when each type of CI will be retired in the CMDB

Allot 45 minutes for discussion.

  1. Discuss the various methods for CIs to be removed from the IT environment.
  2. Critique existing methods to assess consistency and identify issues that could prevent the retirement of CIs in the CMDB in a timely manner.
  3. Create a workflow for the existing processes, with an eye to improvement. Identify any changes that will need to be introduced and managed appropriately.
  4. Identify where additional groups may need to be engaged to ensure success. For example, if project managers are not interfacing early with IT, discuss process changes with them.
  5. Discuss the validation process and determine where control points are. Document these on the workflows.
  6. Discuss data retention. How long will retired information need to be archived? What are the potential scenarios where legacy information may be needed for analysis?
  7. Complete the Configuration Management Standard Operating Procedures, section 8.4: Retire and Archive Configuration Records.

Possible retirement scenarios:

  • Change enablement reviews
  • Vendor-driven product changes
  • Incident management
  • Asset management, lifecycle refresh
Input

Output

  • Discussion
  • Intake processes
MaterialsParticipants
  • Configuration Management Standard Operating Procedures
  • Configuration Management Diagram Template Library
  • Configuration control board
  • Configuration manager
  • Project sponsor
  • IT stakeholders

Determine appropriate actions for detecting new or changed CIs through discovery

Automated detection will provide the most efficient way of recording planned changes to CIs as well as detected unplanned changes. Check with the tool to determine what reports or notifications are available for the configuration management process and define what actions will be appropriate.

As new CIs are detected, identify the process by which they should have been introduced into configuration management and compare against those records. If your CMDB can automatically check for documentation, this may be easier. Weekly reporting will allow you to catch changes quickly, and alerts on critical CIs could enable faster remediation, if the tool allows for alerting. AIOps could identify, notify of, and process many changes in a highly dynamic environment.

Type of Change

Impacted Process

Validation

Findings

Actions

Configuration change to networking equipment or software

Change management

Check for request for change

No RFC

Add to CAB agenda, notify technical owner

Configuration change to end-user device or software

Asset management

Check for service ticket

No ticket

Escalate to asset agenda, notify service manager

New assets coming into service

Security incident and event management

Check for SIEM integration

No SIEM integration

Notify security operations team to investigate

The configuration manager may not have authority to act but can inform the process owners of unauthorized changes for further action. Once the notifications are forwarded to the appropriate process owner, the configuration manager will note the escalation and follow up on data corrections as deemed appropriate by the associated process owner.

3.1.4 Record when and how attributes will change

These lists will help with configuration control plans and your implementation roadmap.

  1. List each attribute that will change in that CI type's life.
  2. Write all the times that each attribute will change. Identify:
    1. The name of the workflow, service request, process, or practice that modifies the attribute.
    2. Whether the update is made automatically or manually.
    3. The role or tool that updates the CMDB.
  1. Update the relevant process or procedure documentation. Explicitly identify when the configuration records are updated.

Document these tables in Configuration Management Standard Operation Procedures, Section 8.7: Practices That Modify CIs.

Network Equipment
Attributes

Practices That Modify This Attribute

Status
  • Infra Deployment (updated manually by Network Engineering)
  • Change Enablement (updated manually by CAB or Network Engineering)
Assigned User
  • IT Employee Offboarding or Role Change (updated manually by Network Engineering)
Version
  • Patch Deployment (updated automatically by SolarWinds)
End-User Computers
Attributes
Practices That Modify This Attribute
Status
  • Device Deployment (updated manually by Desktop Support)
  • Device Recovery (updated manually by Desktop Support)
  • Employee Offboarding and Role Change (updated manually by Service Desk)
Assigned User
  • Device Deployment (updated manually by Desktop Support)
  • Device Recovery (updated manually by Desktop Support)
  • Employee Offboarding and Role Change (updated manually by Service Desk)
Version
  • Patch Deployment (updated automatically by ConfigMgr)

Institute configuration control and configuration baselines where appropriate

A baseline enables an assessment of one or more systems against the desired state and is useful for troubleshooting incidents or problems and validating changes and security settings.

Baselines may be used by enterprise architects and system engineers for planning purposes, by developers to test their solution against production copies, by technicians to assess configuration drift that may be causing performance issues, and by change managers to assess and verify the configuration meets the target design.

Configuration baselines are a snapshot of configuration records, displaying attributes and first-level relationships of the CIs. Standard configurations may be integral to the success of automated workflows, deployments, upgrades, and integrations, as well as prevention of security events. Comparing current CIs against their baselines will identify configuration drift, which could cause a variety of incidents. Configuration baselines are updated through change management processes.
Configuration baselines can be used for a variety of use cases:

  • Version control – Management of software and hardware versions, https://dj5l3kginpy6f.cloudfront.net/blueprints/harness-configuration-management-superpowers-phases-1-4/builds, and releases.
  • Access control – Management of access to facilities, storage areas, and the CMS.
  • Deployment control – Take a baseline of CIs before performing a release so you can use this to check against actual deployment.
  • Identify accidental changes Everyone makes mistakes. If someone installs software on the wrong server or accidentally drops a table in a database, the CMS can alert IT of the unauthorized change (if the CI is included in configuration control).

Info-Tech Insight

Determine the appropriate method for evaluating and approving changes to baselines. Delegating this to the CCB every time may reduce agility, depending on volume. Discuss in CCB meetings.

A decision tree for deploying requested changes.

3.1.5 Institute configuration control and configuration baselines where appropriate

Only baseline CIs and relationships that you want to control through change enablement.

  1. Determine criteria for capturing configuration baselines, including CI type, event, or processes.
  2. Identify who will use baselines and how they will use the data. Identify their needs.
  3. Identify CIs that will be out of scope and not have baselines created.
  4. Document requirements in the SOP.
  5. Ensure appropriate team members have training on how to create and capture baselines in the CMDB.
  6. Document in the Configuration Management Standard Operating Procedures, section 8.5: Establish and Maintain Configuration Baselines.
Process Criteria Systems
Change Enablement & Deployment All high-risk changes must have the baseline captured with version number to revert to stable version in the event of an unsuccessful change
  • Servers (physical and virtual)
  • Enterprise software
  • IaaS
  • Data centers
Security Identify when configuration drift may impact risk mitigation strategies
  • Servers (physical and virtual)
  • Enterprise software
  • IaaS
  • Data centers
Input

Output

  • Discussion
  • Baseline configuration guidelines
MaterialsParticipants
  • Configuration Management Standard Operating Procedures
  • Configuration control board
  • Configuration manager
  • Project sponsor
  • IT stakeholders

Step 3.2

Validate data within the CMDB

Activities

3.2.1 Build an audit plan and checklist

This step will walk you through the following aspects of a configuration management system:

  • Data validation and audit

This phase involves the following participants:

  • IT service owners
  • Enterprise architects
  • Practice owners and managers
  • SCM practice manager
  • Project manager
  • IT audit

Outcomes of this step

  • Updates to processes for data validation
  • Plan for auditing and validating the data in the CMDB

Audit and validate the CMDB

Review the performance of the supporting technologies and processes to validate the accuracy of the CMDB.

A screenshot of the CM Audit Plan.

CM Audit Plan

  • CM policies
  • CM processes and procedures
  • Interfacing processes
  • Content within the CMDB

"If the data in your CMDB isn't accurate, then it's worthless. If it's wrong or inaccurate, it's going to drive the wrong decisions. It's going to make IT worse, not better."
– Valence Howden, Research Director, Info-Tech Research Group

Ensure the supporting technology is working properly

Does the information in the database accurately reflect reality?

Perform functional tests during audits and as part of release management practices.

Audit results need to have a clear status of "compliant," "noncompliant," or "compliant with conditions," and conditions need to be noted. The conditions will generally offer a quick win to improve a process, but don't use these audit results to quickly check off something as "done." Ensure the fix is useful and meaningful to the process.
The audit should cover three areas:

  • Process: Are process requirements for the program well documented? Are the processes being followed? If there were updates to the process, were those updates to the process documented and communicated? Has behavior changed to suit those modified processes?
  • Physical: Physical configuration audits (PCAs) are audits conducted to verify that a configuration item, as built, conforms to the technical documentation that defines and describes it.
  • Functional: Functional configuration audits (FCAs) are audits conducted to verify that the development of a configuration item has been completed satisfactorily, the item has achieved the functional attributes specified in the functional or allocated baseline, and its technical documentation is complete and satisfactory.

Build auditing and validation of processes whenever possible

When technicians and analysts are working on a system, they should check to make sure the data about that system is correct. When they're working in the CMDB, they should check that the data they're working with is correct.

More frequent audits, especially in the early days, may help move toward process adoption and resolving data quality issues. If audits are happening more frequently, the audits can include a smaller scope, though it's important to vary each one to ensure many different areas have been audited through the year.

  • Watch for data duplication from multiple discovery tools.
  • Review mapping to ensure all relevant CIs are attached to a product or service.
  • Ensure report data is logical.

Ensure the supporting technology is working properly

Does the information in the database accurately reflect reality?

Perform functional tests during audits and as part of release management practices.

Audit results need to have a clear status of "compliant," "noncompliant," or "compliant with conditions," and conditions need to be noted. The conditions will generally offer a quick win to improve a process, but don't use these audit results to quickly check off something as "done." Ensure the fix is useful and meaningful to the process.
The audit should cover three areas:

  • Process: Are process requirements for the program well documented? Are the processes being followed? If there were updates to the process, were those updates to the process documented and communicated? Has behavior changed to suit those modified processes?
  • Physical: Physical configuration audits (PCAs) are audits conducted to verify that a configuration item, as built, conforms to the technical documentation that defines and describes it.
  • Functional: Functional configuration audits (FCAs) are audits conducted to verify that the development of a configuration item has been completed satisfactorily, the item has achieved the functional attributes specified in the functional or allocated baseline, and its technical documentation is complete and satisfactory.

More frequent audits, especially in the early days, may help move toward process adoption and resolving data quality issues. If audits are happening more frequently, the audits can include a smaller scope, though it's important to vary each one to ensure many different areas have been audited through the year.

  • Watch for data duplication from multiple discovery tools.
  • Review mapping to ensure all relevant CIs are attached to a product or service.
  • Ensure report data is logical.

Identify where processes break down and data is incorrect

Once process stops working, data becomes less accurate and people find workarounds to solve their own data needs.

Data within the CMDB often becomes incorrect or incomplete where human work breaks down

  • Investigate processes that are performed manually, including data entry.
  • Investigate if the process executors are performing these processes uniformly.
  • Determine if there are opportunities to automate or provide additional training.
  • Select a sample of the corresponding data in the CMS. Verify if the data is correct.

Non-CCB personnel may not be completing processes fully or consistently

  • Identify where data in the CMS needs to be updated.
  • Identify whether the process practitioners are uniformly updating the CMS.
  • Discuss options for improving the process and driving consistency for data that will benefit the whole organization.

Ensure that the data entered in the CMDB is correct

  • Confirm that there is no data duplication. Data duplication is very common when there are multiple discovery tools in your environment. Confirm that you have set up your tools properly to avoid duplication.
  • Build a process to respond to baseline divergence when people make changes without following change processes and when updates alter settings.
  • Audit the system for accuracy and completeness.

3.2.1 Build an audit plan and checklist

Use the audit to identify areas where processes are breaking down.

Audits present you with the ability to address these pain points before they have greater negative impact.

  1. Identify which regulatory requirements and/or auditing bodies will be relevant to audit processes or findings.
  2. Determine frequency of practice audits and how they relate to internal audits or external audits.
  3. Determine audit scope, including requirements for data spot checks.
  4. Determine who will be responsible for conducting audits and validate this is consistent with the RACI chart.
  5. Record audit procedures in the Configuration Management Standard Operating Procedures section 8.6: Verify and Review the Quality of Information Through Auditing.
  6. Review the Configuration Management Audit and Validation Checklist and modify to suit your needs.

Download the Configuration Management Audit and Validation Checklist

Input

Output

  • Discussion
  • Baseline configuration guidelines
MaterialsParticipants
  • Configuration Management Standard Operating Procedures
  • Configuration control board
  • Configuration manager
  • Project sponsor
  • IT stakeholders

Phase 4

Service Configuration Roadmap

StrategyData StructureProcessesRoadmap
  • Challenges and Goals
  • Use Cases and Data
  • Roles and Responsibilities
  • Services
  • Classifications
  • Data Modeling
  • Lifecycle Processes
  • Baselines
  • Audit and Data Validation
  • Metrics
  • Communications Plan
  • Roadmap

This phase will walk you through the following aspect of a configuration management system:
Roadmap
This phase involves the following participants:

  • IT service owners
  • Enterprise architects
  • Practice owners and managers
  • SCM practice manager
  • SCM project manager

Harness Service Configuration Management Superpowers

Step 4.1

Define measures of success

Activities

4.1.1 Identify key metrics to define configuration management success
4.1.2 Brainstorm and record desired reports, dashboards, and analytics
4.1.3 Build a configuration management policy

This phase will walk you through the following aspects of a configuration management system:

  • Metrics
  • Policy

This phase involves the following participants:

  • IT service owners
  • Enterprise architects
  • Practice owners and managers
  • SCM practice manager
  • SCM project manager

The value of metrics can be found in IT efficiency increases

When determining metrics for configuration management, be sure to separate metrics needed to gauge configuration management success and those that will use data from the CMDB to provide metrics on the success of other practices.

  • Metrics provide accurate indicators for IT and business decisions.
  • Metrics help you identify IT efficiencies and problems and solve issues before they become more serious.
  • Active metrics tracking makes root cause analysis of issues much easier.
  • Proper application of metrics helps IT services identification and prioritization.
  • Operational risks can be prevented by identifying and implementing metrics.
  • Metrics analysis increases the confidence of the executive team and ensures that IT is working well.

A funnel is shown. The output is IT Performance. The inputs are: Service Desk Metrics; Incident Metrics; Asset Mgmt. Metrics; Release Mgmt. Metrics; Change Mgmt. Metrics; Infra. Metrics

4.1.1 Identify key metrics to define configuration management success

Determine what metrics are specifically related to the practice and how and when metrics will be accessed.

Success factors

Key metrics

Source

Product and service configuration data is relevant

  • Stakeholder satisfaction with data access, accuracy, and usability
  • Stakeholder satisfaction with service configuration management interface, procedures, and reports

Stakeholder discussions

  • Number of bad decisions made due to incorrect or insufficient data
  • Impact of bad decisions made due to incorrect or insufficient data

Process owner discussions

  • Number and impact of data identified as incorrect
  • % of CMDB data verified over the period

CMDB

Cost and effort are continually optimized

  • Effort devoted to service configuration management
  • Cost of tools directly related to the process

Resource management or scheduling

ERP

Progress reporting

  • Communication execution
  • Process
  • Communications and feedback

Communications team and stakeholder discussions

Data – How many products are in the CMDB and are fully and accurately discovered and mapped?

CMDB

Ability to meet milestones on time and with appropriate quality

Project team

Document metrics in the Configuration Management Standard Operating Procedures, section 7: Success Metrics

Use performance metrics to identify areas to improve service management processes using CMDB data

Metrics can indicate a problem with service management processes but cannot provide a clear path to a solution on their own.

  • The biggest challenge is defining and measuring the process and people side of the equation.
  • Expected performance may also need to be compared to actual performance in planning, budgeting, and improvements.
  • The analysis will need to include critical success factors (CSFs), data collection procedures, office routines, engineering practices, and flow diagrams including workflows and key relationships.
  • External benchmarking may also prove useful in identifying how similar organizations are managing aspects of their infrastructure, processing transactions/requests, or staffing. If using external benchmarking for actual process comparisons, clearly defining your internal processes first will make the data collection process smoother and more informative.

Info-Tech Insight

Using a service framework such as ITIL, COBIT, or ISO 20000 may make this job easier, and subscribing to benchmarking partners will provide some of the external data needed for comparison.

4.1.2 Brainstorm and record desired reports, dashboards, and analytics with related practices

The project team will use this list as a starting point

Allot 45 minutes for this discussion.

  1. Create a table for each service or business capability.
    1. Have one column for each way of consuming data: reports, dashboards, and ad hoc analytics.
    2. Have one row for each stakeholder group that will consume the information.
  2. Use the challenges and use cases to brainstorm reports, dashboards, and ad hoc analytic capabilities that each stakeholder group will find useful.
  3. Record these results in your Configuration Management Standard Operating Procedures, section 7: Aligned Processes' Desired Analytical Capabilities.
Stakeholder Groups Reports Dashboards
Change Management
  • CI changes executed without an RFC
  • RFCs grouped by service
  • Potential collisions in upcoming changes
Security
  • Configuration changes that no longer match the baseline
  • New configuration items discovered
Finance
  • Service-based costs
  • Service consumption by department

Download the blueprint Take Control of Infrastructure and Operations Metrics to create a complete metrics program.

Create a configuration management policy and communicate it

Policies are important documents to provide definitive guidelines and clarity around data collection and use, process adherence, and controls.

  • A configuration management policy will apply to IT as the audience, and participants in the program will largely be technical.
  • Business users will benefit from a great configuration management program but will not participate directly.
  • The policy will include objectives and scope, use of data, security and integrity of data, data models and criteria, and baseline configurations.
  • Several governing regulations and practices may intersect with configuration management, such as ITIL, COBIT, and NIST frameworks, as well as change enablement, quality management, asset management, and more.
  • As the policy is written, review processes to ensure policies and processes are aligned. The policy should enable processes, and it may require modifications if it hinders the collection, security, or use of data required to meet proposed use cases.
  • Once the policy is written and approved, ensure all stakeholders understand the importance, context, and repercussions of the policy.

The approvals process is about appropriate oversight of the drafted policies. For example:

  • Do the policies satisfy compliance and regulatory requirements?
  • Do the policies work with the corporate culture?
  • Do the policies address the underlying need?

If the draft is approved:

  • Set the effective date and a review date.
  • Begin communication, training, and implementation.

Employees must know that there are new policies and understand the steps they must take to comply with the policies in their work.

Employees must be able to interpret, understand, and know how to act upon the information they find in the policies.

Employees must be informed on where to get help or ask questions and who to request policy exceptions from.

If the draft is rejected:

  • Acquire feedback and make revisions.
  • Resubmit for approval.

4.1.3 Build a configuration management policy

This policy provides the foundation for configuration control.

Use this template as a starting point.

The Configuration Management Policy provides the foundation for a configuration control board and the use of configuration baselines.
Instructions:

  1. Review and modify the policy statements. Ensure that the policy statements reflect your organization and the expectations you wish to set.
  2. If you don't have a CCB: The specified responsibilities can usually be assigned to either the configuration manager or the governing body for change enablement.
  3. Determine if you should apply this policy beyond SCM. As written, this policy may provide a good starting point for practices such as:
    • Secure baseline configuration management
    • Software configuration management

Two screenshots from the Configuration Management Policy template

Download the Configuration Management Policy template

Step 4.2

Build communications and a roadmap

Activities

4.2.1 Build a communications plan
4.2.2 Identify milestones

This phase will walk you through the following aspects of a configuration management system:

  • Communications plan
  • Roadmap

This phase involves the following participants:

  • IT service owners
  • Enterprise architects
  • Practice owners and managers
  • SCM practice manager
  • SCM project manager

Outcomes of this step

  • Documented expectations around configuration control
  • Roadmap and action items for the SCM project

Do not discount the benefits of a great communications plan as part of change management

Many configuration management projects have failed due to lack of organizational commitment and inadequate communications.

  • Start at the top to ensure stakeholder buy-in by verifying alignment and use cases. Without a committed project sponsor who believes in the value of configuration management, it will be difficult to draw the IT team into the vision.
  • Clearly articulate the vision, strategy, and goals to all stakeholders. Ensure the team understands why these changes are happening, why they are happening now, and what outcomes you hope to achieve.
  • Gain support from technical teams by clearly expressing organizational and departmental benefits – they need to know "what's in it for me."
  • Clearly communicate new responsibilities and obligations and put a feedback process in place to hear concerns, mitigate risk, and act on opportunities for improvement. Be prepared to answer questions as this practice is rolled out.
  • Be consistent in your messaging. Mixed messages can easily derail progress.
  • Communicate to the business how these efforts will benefit the organization.
  • Share documents built in this blueprint or workshop with your technical teams to ensure they have a clear picture of the entire configuration management practice.
  • Share your measures and view of success and communicate wins throughout building the practice.

30%

When people are truly invested in change, it is 30% more likely to stick.
McKinsey

82%

of CEOs identify organizational change management as a priority.
D&B Consulting

6X

Initiatives with excellent change management are six times more likely to meet objectives than those with poor change management.
Prosci

For a more detailed program, see Drive Technology Adoption

Formulate a communications plan to ensure all stakeholders and impacted staff will be aware of the plan

Communication is key to success in process adoption and in identifying potential risks and issues with integration with other processes. Engage as often as needed to get the information you need for the project and for adoption.

Identify Messages

Distinct information that needs to be sent at various times. Think about:

  • Who will be impacted and how.
  • What the goals are for the project/new process.
  • What the audience needs to know about the new process and how they will interface with each business unit.
  • How people can request configuration data.

Identify Audiences

Any person or group who will be the target of the communication. This may include:

  • Project sponsors and stakeholders.
  • IT staff who will be involved in the project.
  • IT staff who will be impacted by the project (i.e. who will benefit from it or have obligations to fulfill because of it).
  • Business sponsors and product owners.

Document and Track

Document messaging, medium, and responsibility, working with the communications team to refine messages before executing.

  • Identify where people can send questions and feedback to ensure they have the information they need to make or accept the changes.
  • Document Q&A and share in a central location.

Determine Timing

Successful communications plans consider timing of various messages:

  • Advanced high-level notice of improvements for those who need to see action.
  • Advanced detailed notice for those who will be impacted by workload.
  • Advanced notice for who will be impacted (i.e. who will benefit from it or have obligations to fulfill because of it) once the project is ready to be transitioned to daily life.

Determine Delivery

Work with your communications team, if you have one, to determine the best medium, such as:

  • Meeting announcement for stakeholders and IT.
  • Newsletter for those less impacted.
  • Intranet announcements: "coming soon!"
  • Demonstrations with vendors or project team.

4.2.1 Build a communications plan

The communications team will use this list as a starting point.

Allot 45 minutes for this discussion.

Identify stakeholders.

  1. Identify everyone who will be affected by the project and by configuration management.

Craft key messages tailored to each stakeholder group.

  1. Identify the key messages that must be communicated to each group.

Finalize the communication plan.

  1. Determine the most appropriate timing for communications with each group to maximize receptivity.
  2. Identify any communication challenges you anticipate and incorporate steps to address them into your communication plan.
  3. Identify multiple methods for getting the messages out (e.g. newsletters, emails, meetings).
  1. Identify how feedback will be collected (i.e. through interviews or surveys) to measure whether the changes were communicated well.
Audience Message Medium Timing Feedback Mechanism
Configuration Management Team Communicate all key processes, procedures, policies, roles, and responsibilities In-person meetings and email communications Weekly meetings Informal feedback during weekly meetings
Input

Output

  • Discussion
  • Rough draft of messaging for communications team
MaterialsParticipants
  • Project plan
  • Configuration manager
  • Project sponsor
  • IT director
  • Communications team

Build a realistic, high-level roadmap including milestones

Break the work into manageable pieces

  1. Plan to have multiple phases with short-, medium-, and long-term goals/timeframes. Building a CMDB is not easy and should be broken into manageable sections.
  2. Set reasonable milestones. For each phase, document goals to define "done" and ensure they're reasonable for the resources you have available. If working with a vendor, include them in your discussions of what's realistic.
  3. Treat the first phase as a pilot. Focus on items you understand well:
    1. Well-understood user-facing and IT services
    2. High-maturity management and governance practices
    3. Trusted data sources
  4. Capture high-value, high-criticality services early. Depending on the complexity of your systems, you may need to split this phase into multiple phases.

Document this table in the Configuration Management Project Charter, section 3.0: Milestones

Timeline/Owner Milestone/Deliverable Details
First four weeks Milestone: Plan defined and validated with ITSM installation vendor Define processes for intake, maintenance, and retirement.
Rebecca Roberts Process documentation written, approved, and ready to communicate Review CI categories

4.2.2 Identify milestones

Build out a high-level view to inform the project plan

Open the Configuration Management Project Charter, section 3: Milestones.
Instructions:

  1. Identify high-level milestones for the implementation of the configuration management program. This may include tool evaluation and implementation, assignment of roles, etc.
  2. Add details to fill out the milestone, keeping to a reasonable level of detail. This may inform vendor discussion or further development of the project plan.
  3. Add target dates to the milestones. Validate they are realistic with the team.
  4. Add notes to the assumptions and constraints section.
  5. Identify risks to the plan.

Two Screenshots from the Configuration Management Project Charter

Download the Configuration Management Project Charter

Workshop Participants

R = Recommended
O = Optional

Participants Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4
Configuration Management Strategy CMDB Data Structure Processes Communications & Roadmap
Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon
Head of IT R O
Project Sponsor R R O O O O O O
Infrastructure, Enterprise Apps Leaders R R O O O O O O
Service Manager R R O O O O O O
Configuration Manager R R R R R R R R
Project Manager R R R R R R R R
Representatives From Network, Compute, Storage, Desktop R R R R R R R R
Enterprise Architecture R R R R O O O O
Owner of Change Management/Change Control/Change Enablement R R R R R R R R
Owner of In-Scope Apps, Use Cases R R R R R R R R
Asset Manager R R R R R R R R

Related Info-Tech Research

Research Contributors and Experts

Thank you to everyone who contributed to this publication

Brett Johnson, Senior Consultant, VMware

Yev Khovrenkov, Senior Consultant, Solvera Solutions

Larry Marks, Reviewer, ISACA New Jersey

Darin Ohde, Director of Service Delivery, GreatAmerica Financial Services

Jim Slick, President/CEO, Slick Cyber Systems

Emily Walker, Sr. Digital Solution Consultant, ServiceNow

Valence Howden, Principal Research Director, Info-Tech Research Group

Allison Kinnaird, Practice Lead, IT Operations, Info-Tech Research Group

Robert Dang, Principal Research Advisor, Security, Info-Tech Research Group

Monica Braun, Research Director, IT Finance, Info-Tech Research Group

Jennifer Perrier, Principal Research Director, IT Finance, Info-Tech Research Group

Plus 13 anonymous contributors

Bibliography

An Introduction to Change Management, Prosci, Nov. 2019.
BAI10 Manage Configuration Audit Program. ISACA, 2014.
Bizo, Daniel, et al, "Uptime Institute Global Data Center Survey 2021." Uptime Institute, 1 Sept. 2021.
Brown, Deborah. "Change Management: Some Statistics." D&B Consulting Inc. May 15, 2014. Accessed June 14, 2016.
Cabinet Office. ITIL Service Transition. The Stationery Office, 2011.
"COBIT 2019: Management and Governance Objectives. ISACA, 2018.
"Configuration Management Assessment." CMStat, n.d. Accessed 5 Oct. 2022.
"Configuration Management Database Foundation." DMTF, 2018. Accessed 1 Feb. 2021.
Configuration Management Using COBIT 5. ISACA, 2013.
"Configuring Service Manager." Product Documentation, Ivanti, 2021. Accessed 9 Feb. 2021.
"Challenges of Implementing configuration management." CMStat, n.d. Accessed 5 Oct. 2022.
"Determining if configuration management and change control are under management control, part 1." CMStat, n.d. Accessed 5 Oct. 2022.
"Determining if configuration management and change control are under management control, part 2." CMStat, n.d. Accessed 5 Oct. 2022.
"Determining if configuration management and change control are under management control, part 3." CMStat, n.d. Accessed 5 Oct. 2022.
"CSDM: The Recipe for Success." Data Content Manager, Qualdatrix Ltd. 2022. Web.
Drogseth, Dennis, et al., 2015, CMDB Systems: Making Change Work in the Age of Cloud and Agile. Morgan Kaufman.
Ewenstein, B, et al. "Changing Change Management." McKinsey & Company, 1 July 2015. Web.
Farrell, Karen. "VIEWPOINT: Focus on CMDB Leadership." BMC Software, 1 May 2006. Web.
"How to Eliminate the No. 1 Cause of Network Downtime." SolarWinds, 4 April 2014. Accessed 9 Feb. 2021.
"ISO 10007:2017: Quality Management -- Guidelines for Configuration Management." International Organization for Standardization, 2019.
"IT Operations Management." Product Documentation, ServiceNow, version Quebec, 2021. Accessed 9 Feb. 2021.
Johnson, Elsbeth. "How to Communicate Clearly During Organizational Change." Harvard Business Review, 13 June 2017. Web.
Kloeckner, K. et al. Transforming the IT Services Lifecycle with AI Technologies. Springer, 2018.
Klosterboer, L. Implementing ITIL Configuration Management. IBM Press, 2008.
Norfolk, D., and S. Lacy. Configuration Management: Expert Guidance for IT Service Managers and Practitioners. BCS Learning & Development Limited, revised ed., Jan. 2014.
Painarkar, Mandaar. "Overview of the Common Data Model." BMC Documentation, 2015. Accessed 1 Feb. 2021.
Powers, Larry, and Ketil Been. "The Value of Organizational Change Management." Boxley Group, 2014. Accessed June 14, 2016.
"Pulse of the Profession: Enabling Organizational Change Throughout Strategic Initiatives." PMI, March 2014. Accessed June 14, 2016.
"Service Configuration Management, ITIL 4 Practice Guide." AXELOS Global Best Practice, 2020
"The Guide to Managing Configuration Drift." UpGuard, 2017.

Diagnose and Optimize Your Lead Gen Engine

  • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}567|cart{/j2store}
  • member rating overall impact: N/A
  • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
  • member rating average days saved: N/A
  • Parent Category Name: Marketing Solutions
  • Parent Category Link: /marketing-solutions

88% of marketing professionals are unsatisfied with their ability to convert leads (Convince & Convert), but poor lead conversion is just a symptom of much deeper problems.

Globally, B2B SaaS marketers without a well-running lead gen engine will experience:

  • A low volume of quality leads from their website.
  • A low conversion rate from their website visitors.
  • A long lead conversion time compared to competitors.
  • A low volume of organic website visitors.

If treated without a root cause analysis, these symptoms often result in higher-than-average marketing spend and wasted resources. Without an accurate lead gen engine diagnostic tool and a strategy to fix the misfires, marketers will continue to waste valuable time and resources.

Our Advice

Critical Insight

The lead gen engine is foundational in building profitable long-term customer relationships. It is the process through which marketers build awareness, trust, and loyalty. Without the ability to continually diagnose lead gen engine flaws, marketers will fail to optimize new customer relationship creation and long-term satisfaction and loyalty.

Impact and Result

With a targeted set of diagnostic tools and an optimization strategy, you will:

  • Uncover the critical weakness in your lead generation engine.
  • Develop a best-in-class lead gen engine optimization strategy that builds relationships, creates awareness, and establishes trust and loyalty with prospects.
  • Build profitable long-term customer relationships.

Organizations who activate the findings from their lead generation diagnostic and optimization strategy will decrease the time and budget spent on lead generation by 25% to 50%. They will quickly uncover inefficiencies in their lead gen engine and develop a proven lead generation optimization strategy based on the diagnostic findings.

Diagnose and Optimize Your Lead Gen Engine Research & Tools

Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

1. Diagnose and Optimize Your Lead Gen Engine Deck – A deck to help you diagnose what’s not working in your lead gen engine so that you can remedy issues and get back on track, building new customer relationships and driving loyalty.

Organizations who activate the findings from their lead generation diagnostic and optimization strategy will decrease the time and budget spent on lead generation by 25% to 50%. They will quickly uncover inefficiencies in their lead gen engine and develop a proven lead generation optimization strategy based on the diagnostic findings.

  • Diagnose and Optimize Your Lead Gen Engine Storyboard

2. Lead Gen Engine Diagnostic Tool – An easy-to-use diagnostic tool that will help you pinpoint weakness within your lead gen engine.

The diagnostic tool allows digital marketers to quickly and easily diagnose weakness within your lead gen engine.

  • Lead Gen Engine Diagnostic Tool

3. Lead Gen Engine Optimization Strategy Template – A step-by-step document that walks you through how to properly optimize the performance of your lead gen engine.

Develop a best-in-class lead gen engine optimization strategy that builds relationships, creates awareness, and establishes trust and loyalty with prospects.

  • Lead Gen Engine Optimization Strategy Template

Infographic

Further reading

Diagnose and Optimize Your Lead Gen Engine

Quickly and easily pinpoint any weakness in your lead gen engine so that you stop wasting money and effort on ineffective advertising and marketing.

EXECUTIVE BRIEF

Analyst Perspective

Quickly and easily pinpoint any weakness in your lead gen engine so that you stop wasting money and effort on ineffective advertising and marketing.

The image contains a photo of Terra Higginson.

Senior digital marketing leaders are accountable for building relationships, creating awareness, and developing trust and loyalty with website visitors, thereby delivering high-quality, high-value leads that Sales can easily convert to wins. Unfortunately, many marketing leaders report that their website visitors are low-quality and either disengage quickly or, when they engage further with lead gen engine components, they just don’t convert. These marketing leaders urgently need to diagnose what’s not working in three key areas in their lead gen engine to quickly remedy the issue and get back on track, building new customer relationships and driving loyalty. This blueprint will provide you with a tool to quickly and easily diagnose weakness within your lead gen engine. You can use the results to create a strategy that builds relationships, creates awareness, and establishes trust and loyalty with prospects.

Terra Higginson

Marketing Research Director

SoftwareReviews

Executive Summary

Your Challenge

Globally, business-to-business (B2B) software-as-a-service (SaaS) marketers without a well-running lead gen engine will experience:

  • A low volume of quality leads from their website.
  • A low conversion rate from their website visitors.
  • A long lead conversion time compared to competitors.
  • A low volume of organic website visitors.

88% of marketing professionals are unsatisfied with their ability to convert leads (Convince & Convert), but poor lead conversion is just a symptom of a much larger problem with the lead gen engine. Without an accurate lead gen engine diagnostic tool and a strategy to fix the leaks, marketers will continue to waste valuable time and resources.

Common Obstacles

Even though lead generation is a critical element of marketing success, marketers struggle to fix the problems with their lead gen engine due to:

  • A lack of resources.
  • A lack of budget.
  • A lack of experience in implementing effective lead generation strategies.

Most marketers spend too much on acquiring leads and not enough on converting and keeping them. For every $92 spent acquiring customers, only $1 is spent converting them (Econsultancy, cited in Outgrow). Marketers are increasingly under pressure to deliver high-quality leads to sales but work under tight budgets with inadequate or inexperienced staff who don’t understand the importance of optimizing the lead generation process.

SoftwareReviews’ Approach

With a targeted set of diagnostic tools and an optimization strategy, you will:

  • Uncover the critical weakness in your lead generation engine.
  • Develop a best-in-class lead gen engine optimization strategy that builds relationships, creates awareness, and establishes trust and loyalty with prospects.
  • Build profitable long-term customer relationships.

Organizations who activate the findings from their lead generation diagnostic and optimization strategy will decrease the time and budget spent on lead generation by 25% to 50%. They will quickly uncover inefficiencies in their lead gen engine and develop a proven lead generation optimization strategy based on the diagnostic findings.

SoftwareReviews Insight

The lead gen engine is foundational in building profitable long-term customer relationships. It is the process through which marketers build awareness, trust, and loyalty. Without the ability to continually diagnose lead gen engine flaws, marketers will fail to optimize new customer relationship creation and long-term satisfaction and loyalty.

Your Challenge

88% of marketing professionals are unsatisfied with their ability to convert leads, but poor lead conversion is just a symptom of much deeper problems.

Globally, B2B SaaS marketers without a well-running lead gen engine will experience:

  • A low volume of organic website visitors.
  • A low volume of quality leads from their website.
  • A low conversion rate from their website visitors.
  • A longer lead conversion time than competitors in the same space.

If treated without a root-cause analysis, these symptoms often result in higher-than-average marketing spend and wasted resources. Without an accurate lead gen engine diagnostic tool and a strategy to fix the misfires, marketers will continue to waste valuable time and resources.

88% of marketers are unsatisfied with lead conversion (Convince & Convert).

The image contains a diagram that demonstrates a flowchart of the areas where visitors fail to convert. It incorporates observations, benchmarks, and uses a flowchart to diagnose the root causes.

Benchmarks

Compare your lead gen engine metrics to industry benchmarks.

For every 10,000 people that visit your website, 210 will become leads.

For every 210 leads, 101 will become marketing qualified leads (MQLs).

For every 101 MQLs, 47 will become sales qualified leads (SQLs).

For every 47 SQLs, 23 will become opportunities.

For every 23 opportunities, nine will become customers.

.9% to 2.1%

36% to 48%

28% to 46%

39% to 48%

32% to 40%

Leads Benchmark

MQL Benchmark

SQL Benchmark

Opportunity Benchmark

Closing Benchmark

The percentage of website visitors that convert to leads.

The percentage of leads that convert to marketing qualified leads.

The percentage of MQLs that convert to sales qualified leads.

The percentage of SQLs that convert to opportunities.

The percentage of opportunities that are closed.

Midmarket B2B SaaS Industry

Source: “B2B SaaS Marketing KPIs,” First Page Sage, 2021

Common obstacles

Why do most organizations improperly diagnose a misfiring lead gen engine?

Lack of Clear Starting Point

The lead gen engine is complex, with many moving parts, and marketers and marketing ops are often overwhelmed about where to begin diagnosis.

Lack of Benchmarks

Marketers often call out metrics such as increasing website visitors, contact-to-lead conversions, numbers of qualified leads delivered to Sales, etc., without a proven benchmark to compare their results against.

Lack of Alignment Between Marketing and Sales

Definitions of a contact, a marketing qualified lead, a sales qualified lead, and a marketing influenced win often vary.

Lack of Measurement Tools

Integration gaps between the website, marketing automation, sales enablement, and analytics exist within some 70% of enterprises. The elements of the marketing (and sales) tech stack change constantly. It’s hard to keep up.

Lack of Understanding of Marketing ROI

This drives many marketers to push the “more” button – more assets, more emails, more ad spend – without first focusing on optimization and effectiveness.

Lack of Resources

Marketers have an endless list of to-dos that drive them to produce daily results. Especially among software startups and mid-sized companies, there are just not enough staff with the right skills to diagnose and fix today’s sophisticated lead gen engines.

Implications of poor diagnostics

Without proper lead gen engine diagnostics, marketing performs poorly

  • The lead gen engine builds relationships and trust. When a broken lead gen engine goes unoptimized, customer relationships are at risk.
  • When the lead gen engine isn’t working well, customer acquisition costs rise as more expensive sales resources are charged with prospect qualification.
  • Without a well-functioning lead gen engine, marketers lack the foundation they need to create awareness among prospects – growth suffers.
  • Marketers will throw money at content or ads to generate more leads without any real understanding of engine leakage and misfires – your cost per lead climbs and reduces marketing profitability.

Most marketers are spending too much on acquiring leads and not enough on converting and keeping them. For every $92 spent acquiring customers, only $1 is spent converting them.

Source: Econsultancy, cited in Outgrow

Lead gen engine optimization increases the efficiency of your marketing efforts and has a 223% ROI.

Source: WordStream

Benefits of lead gen engine diagnostics

Diagnosing your lead gen engine delivers key benefits:

  • Pinpoint weakness quickly. A quick and accurate lead gen engine diagnostic tool saves Marketing 50% of the effort spent uncovering the reason for low conversion and low-quality leads.
  • Optimize more easily. Marketing executives will save 70% of the time spent creating a lead gen optimization marketing strategy based upon the diagnostic findings.
  • Maximize marketing ROI. Build toward and maintain the golden 3:1 LTV:CAC (lifetime value to customer acquisition cost) ratio for B2B SaaS marketing.
  • Stop wasting money on ineffective advertising and marketing. Up to 75% of your marketing budget is being inefficiently spent if you are running on a broken lead gen engine.

“It’s much easier to double your business by doubling your conversion rate than by doubling your traffic. Correct targeting and testing methods can increase conversion rates up to 300 percent.” – Jeff Eisenberg, IterateStudio

Source: Lift Division

True benefits of fixing the lead gen engine

These numbers add up to a significant increase in marketing influenced wins.

175%
Buyer Personas Increase Revenue
Source: Illumin8

202%
Personalized CTAs Increase Conversions
Source: HubSpot

50%
Lead Magnets Increase Conversions
Source: ClickyDrip

79%
Lead Scoring Increases Conversions
Source: Bloominari

50%
Lead Nurturing Increases Conversions
Source: KevinTPayne.com

80%
Personalized Landing Pages Increase Conversions
Source: HubSpot

Who benefits from an optimized lead gen engine?

This Research Is Designed for:

  • Senior digital marketing leaders who are:
    • Looking to increase conversions.
    • Looking to increase the quality of leads.
    • Looking to increase the value of leads.

This Research Will Help You:

  • Diagnose issues with your lead gen engine.
  • Create a lead gen optimization strategy and a roadmap.

This Research Will Also Assist:

  • Digital marketing leaders and product marketing leaders who are:
    • Looking to decrease the effort needed by Sales to close leads.
    • Looking to increase leadership’s faith in Marketing’s ability to generate high-quality leads and conversions.

This Research Will Help Them:

  • Align the Sales and Marketing teams.
  • Receive the necessary buy-in from management to increase marketing spend and headcount.
  • Avoid product failure.
The image contains a screenshot of the thought model that is titled: Diagnose and Optimize your Lead Gen Engine. The image contains the screenshot of the previous image shown on Where Lead Gen Engines Fails, and includes new information. The flowchart connects to a box that says: STOP, Your engine is broken. It then explains phase 1, the diagnostic, and then phase 2 Optimization strategy.

SoftwareReviews’ approach

  1. Diagnose Misfires in the Lead Gen Engine
  2. Identifying any areas of weakness within your lead gen engine is a fundamental first step in improving conversions, ROI, and lead quality.

  3. Create a Lead Gen Optimization Strategy
  4. Optimize your lead gen strategy with an easily customizable template that will provide your roadmap for future growth.

The SoftwareReviews Methodology to Diagnose and Optimize Your Lead Gen Engine

1. Lead Gen Engine Diagnostic

2. Lead Gen Engine Optimization Strategy

Phase Steps

  1. Select lead gen engine optimization steering committee & working team
  2. Gather baseline metrics
  3. Run the lead gen engine diagnostic
  4. Identify low-scoring areas & prioritize lead gen engine fixes
  1. Define the roadmap
  2. Create lead gen engine optimization strategy
  3. Present strategy to steering committee

Phase Outcomes

  • Identify weakness within the lead gen engine.
  • Prioritize the most important fixes within the lead gen engine.
  • Create a best-in-class lead gen engine optimization strategy and roadmap that builds relationships, creates awareness, and develops trust and loyalty with website visitors.
  • Increase leadership’s faith in Marketing’s ability to generate high-quality leads and conversions.

Insight Summary

The lead gen engine is the foundation of marketing

The lead gen engine is critical to building relationships. It is the foundation upon which marketers build awareness, trust, and loyalty.

Misalignment between Sales and Marketing is costly

Digital marketing leaders need to ensure agreement with Sales on the definition of a marketing qualified lead (MQL), as it is the most essential element of stakeholder alignment.

Prioritization is necessary for today’s marketer

By prioritizing the fixes within the lead gen engine that have the highest impact, a marketing leader will be able to focus their optimization efforts in the right place.

Stop, your engine is broken

Any advertising or effort expended while running marketing on a broken lead gen engine is time and money wasted. It is only once the lead gen engine is fixed that marketers will see the true results of their efforts.

Tactical insight

Without a well-functioning lead gen engine, marketers risk wasting valuable time and money because they aren’t creating relationships with prospects that will increase the quality of leads, conversion rate, and lifetime value.

Tactical insight

The foundational lead relationship must be built at the marketing level, or else Sales will be entirely responsible for creating these relationships with low-quality leads, risking product failure.

Blueprint Deliverable:

Each step of this blueprint is accompanied by supporting deliverables to help you accomplish your goals:

Lead Gen Engine Diagnostic

An efficient and easy-to-use diagnostic tool that uncovers weakness in your lead gen engine.

The image contains a screenshot of the Lead Gen Engine Diagnostic is shown.

Key Deliverable:

Lead Gen Engine Optimization Strategy Template

The image contains a screenshot of the Lead Gen Engine Optimization Strategy.

A comprehensive strategy for optimizing conversions and increasing the quality of leads.

SoftwareReviews Offers Various Levels of Support to Meet Your Needs

Included within Advisory Membership:

DIY Toolkit

“Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful.”

Guided Implementation

“Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track.”

Optional add-ons:

Workshop

“We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place.”

Consulting

“Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project.”

Guided Implementation

What does a typical GI on lead gen engine diagnostics look like?

Diagnose Your Lead Gen Engine

Call #1: Scope requirements, objectives, and specific challenges with your lead gen engine.

Call #2: Gather baseline metrics and discuss the steering committee and working team.

Call #3: Review results from baseline metrics and answer questions.

Call #4: Discuss the lead gen engine diagnostic tool and your steering committee.

Call #5: Review results from the diagnostic tool and answer questions.

Develop Your Lead Gen Engine Optimization Strategy

Call #6: Identify components to include in the lead gen engine optimization strategy.

Call #7: Discuss the roadmap for continued optimization.

Call #8: Review final lead gen engine optimization strategy.

Call #9: (optional) Follow-up quarterly to check in on progress and answer questions.

A Guided Implementation (GI) is series of calls with a SoftwareReviews Advisory analyst to help implement our best practices in your organization. For guidance on marketing applications, we can arrange a discussion with an Info-Tech analyst. Your engagement managers will work with you to schedule analyst calls.

Workshop Overview

Day 1

Day 2

Activities

Complete Lead Gen Engine Diagnostic

1.1 Identify the previously selected lead gen engine steering committee and working team.

1.2 Share the baseline metrics that were gathered in preparation for the workshop.

1.3 Run the lead gen engine diagnostic.

1.4 Identify low-scoring areas and prioritize lead gen engine fixes.

Create Lead Gen Engine Optimization Strategy

2.1 Define the roadmap.

2.2 Create a lead gen engine optimization strategy.

2.3 Present the strategy to the steering committee.

Deliverables

1. Lead gen engine diagnostic scorecard

1. Lead gen engine optimization strategy

Contact your account representative for more information.

workshops@infotech.com1-888-670-8889

Phase 1

Lead Gen Engine Diagnostic

Phase 1

Phase 2

1.1 Select lead gen engine steering committee & working team

1.2 Gather baseline metrics

1.3 Run the lead gen engine diagnostic

1.4 Identify & prioritize low-scoring areas

2.1 Define the roadmap

2.2 Create lead gen engine optimization strategy

2.3 Present strategy to steering committee

This phase will walk you through the following activities:

The diagnostic tool will allow you to quickly and easily identify the areas of weakness in the lead gen engine by answering some simple questions. The steps include:

  • Select the lead gen engine optimization committee and team.
  • Gather baseline metrics.
  • Run the lead gen engine diagnostic.
  • Identify and prioritize low-scoring areas.

This phase involves the following participants:

  • Marketing lead
  • Lead gen engine steering committee

Step 1.1

Identify Lead Gen Engine Optimization Steering Committee & Working Team

Activities

1.1.1 Identify the lead gen engine optimization steering committee and document in the Lead Gen Engine Optimization Strategy Template

1.1.2 Identify the lead gen engine optimization working team document in the Lead Gen Engine Optimization Strategy Template

This step will walk you through the following activities:

Identify the lead gen engine optimization steering committee.

This step involves the following participants:

  • Marketing director
  • Leadership

Outcomes of this step

An understanding of who will be responsible and who will be accountable for accomplishing the lead gen engine diagnostic and optimization strategy.

1.1.1 Identify the lead gen engine optimization steering committee

1-2 hours

  1. The marketing lead should meet with leadership to determine who will make up the steering committee for the lead gen engine optimization.
  2. Document the steering committee members in the Lead Gen Engine Optimization Strategy Template slide entitled “The Steering Committee.”

Input

Output

  • Stakeholders and leaders across the various functions outlined on the next slide
  • List of the lead gen engine optimization strategy steering committee members

Materials

Participants

  • Lead Gen Engine Optimization Strategy Template
  • Marketing director
  • Executive leadership

Download the Lead Gen Engine Optimization Strategy Template

Lead gen engine optimization steering committee

Consider the skills and knowledge required for the diagnostic and the implementation of the strategy. Constructing a cross-functional steering committee will be essential for the optimization of the lead gen engine. At least one stakeholder from each relevant department should be included in the steering committee.

Required Skills/Knowledge

Suggested Functions

  • Target Buyer
  • Product Roadmap
  • Brand
  • Competitors
  • Campaigns/Lead Gen
  • Sales Enablement
  • Media/Analysts
  • Customer Satisfaction
  • Data Analytics
  • Ad Campaigns
  • Competitive Intelligence
  • Product Marketing
  • Product Management
  • Creative Director
  • Competitive Intelligence
  • Field Marketing
  • Sales
  • PR/AR/Corporate Comms
  • Customer Success
  • Analytics Executive
  • Campaign Manager

For small and mid-sized businesses (SMB), because employees wear many different hats, assign people that have the requisite skills and knowledge, not the role title.

The image contains examples of small and mid-sized businesses, and the different employee recommendations.

1.1.2 Identify the lead gen engine optimization working team

1-2 hours

  1. The marketing director should meet with leadership to determine who will make up the working team for the lead gen engine optimization.
  2. Finalize selection of team members and fill out the slide entitled “The Working Team” in the Lead Gen Engine Optimization Strategy Template.

Input

Output

  • Executives and analysts responsible for execution of tasks across Marketing, Product, Sales, and IT
  • The lead gen engine optimization working team

Materials

Participants

  • The Lead Gen Engine Optimization Strategy Template
  • Marketing director
  • Executive leadership

Download the Lead Gen Engine Optimization Strategy Template

Lead gen engine working team

Consider the working skills required for the diagnostic and implementation of the strategy and assign the working team.

Required Skills/Knowledge

Suggested Titles

  • SEO
  • Inbound Marketing
  • Paid Advertising
  • Website Development
  • Content Creation
  • Lead Scoring
  • Landing Pages
  • A/B Testing
  • Email Campaigns
  • Marketing and Sales Automation
  • SEO Analyst
  • Content Marketing Manager
  • Product Marketing Manager
  • Website Manager
  • Website Developer
  • Sales Manager
  • PR
  • Customer Success Manager
  • Analytics Executive
  • Campaign Manager

Step 1.2

Gather Baseline Metrics

Activities

1.2.1 Gather baseline metrics and document in the Lead Gen Engine Optimization Strategy Template

This step will walk you through the following activities:

Gather baseline metrics.

This step involves the following participants:

  • Marketing director
  • Analytics lead

Outcomes of this step

Understand and document baseline marketing metrics.

1.2.1 Gather baseline metrics and document in the Lead Gen Engine Optimization Strategy Template

1-2 hours

  1. Use the example on the next slide to learn about the B2B SaaS industry-standard baseline metrics.
  2. Meet with the analytics lead to analyze and record the data within the “Baseline Metrics” slide of the Lead Gen Engine Optimization Strategy Template. The baseline metrics will include:
    • Unique monthly website visitors
    • Visitor to lead conversion rate
    • Lead to MQL conversion rate
    • Customer acquisition cost (CAC)
    • Lifetime customer value to customer acquisition cost (LTV to CAC) ratio
    • Campaign ROI

Recording the baseline data allows you to measure the impact your lead gen engine optimization strategy has over the baseline.

Input

Output
  • Marketing and analytics data
  • Documentation of baseline marketing metrics

Materials

Participants

  • The lead gen engine optimization strategy
  • Marketing director
  • Analytics lead

B2B SaaS baseline metrics

Industry standard metrics for B2B SaaS in 2022

Unique Monthly Visitors

Industry standard is 5% to 10% growth month over month.

Visitor to Lead Conversion

Industry standard is between 0.9% to 2.1%.

Lead to MQL Conversion

Industry standard is between 36% to 48%.

CAC

Industry standard is a cost of $400 to $850 per customer acquired.

LTV to CAC Ratio

Industry standard is an LTV:CAC ratio between 3 to 6.

Campaign ROI

Email: 201%

Pay-Per-Click (PPC): 36%

LinkedIn Ads: 94%

Source: “B2B SaaS Marketing KPIs,” First Page Sage, 2021

Update the Lead Gen Optimization Strategy Template with your company’s baseline metrics.

Download the Lead Gen Engine Optimization Strategy Template

Step 1.3

Run the Lead Gen Engine Diagnostic

Activities

1.3.1 Gather steering committee and working team to complete the Lead Gen Engine Diagnostic Tool

This step will walk you through the following activities:

Gather the steering committee and answer the questions within the Lead Gen Engine Diagnostic Tool.

This step involves the following participants:

  • Lead gen engine optimization working team
  • Lead gen engine optimization steering committee

Outcomes of this step

Lead gen engine diagnostic and scorecard

1.3.1 Gather the committee and team to complete the Lead Gen Engine Diagnostic Tool

2-3 hours

  1. Schedule a two-hour meeting with the steering committee and working team to complete the Lead Gen Engine Diagnostic Tool. To ensure the alignment of all departments and the quality of results, all steering committee members must participate.
  2. Answer the questions within the tool and then review your company’s results in the Results tab.

Input

Output

  • Marketing and analytics data
  • Diagnostic scorecard for the lead gen engine

Materials

Participants

  • Lead Gen Engine Diagnostic Tool
  • Marketing director
  • Analytics lead

Download the Lead Gen Engine Diagnostic Tool

Step 1.4

Identify & Prioritize Low-Scoring Areas

Activities

1.4.1 Identify and prioritize low-scoring areas from the diagnostic scorecard

This step will walk you through the following activities:

Identify and prioritize the low-scoring areas from the diagnostic scorecard.

This step involves the following participants:

  • Marketing director

Outcomes of this step

A prioritized list of the lead gen engine problems to include in the Lead Gen Engine Optimization Strategy Template

1.4.1 Identify and prioritize low-scoring areas from the diagnostic scorecard

1 hour

  1. Transfer the results from the Lead Gen Engine Diagnostic Scorecard Results tab to the Lead Gen Engine Optimization Strategy Template slide entitled “Lead Gen Engine Diagnostic Scorecard.”
    • Results between 0 and 2 should be listed as high-priority fixes on the “Lead Gen Engine Diagnostic Scorecard” slide. You will use these areas for your strategy.
    • Results between 2 and 3 should be listed as medium-priority fixes on “Lead Gen Engine Diagnostic Scorecard” slide. You will use these areas for your strategy.
    • Results between 3 and 4 are within the industry standard and will require no fixes or only small adjustments.

Input

Output

  • Marketing and analytics data
  • Documentation of baseline marketing metrics

Materials

Participants

  • Lead Gen Engine Optimization Strategy Template
  • Marketing director
  • Analytics lead

Download the Lead Gen Engine Diagnostic Tool

Phase 2

Lead Gen Engine Optimization Strategy

Phase 1

Phase 2

1.1 Select lead gen engine steering committee & working team

1.2 Gather baseline metrics

1.3 Run the lead gen engine diagnostic

1.4 Identify & prioritize low-scoring areas

2.1 Define the roadmap

2.2 Create lead gen engine optimization strategy

2.3 Present strategy to steering committee

This phase will walk you through the following activities:

Create a best-in-class lead gen optimization strategy and roadmap based on the weaknesses found in the diagnostic tool. The steps include:

  • Define the roadmap.
  • Create a lead gen engine optimization strategy.
  • Present the strategy to the steering committee.

This phase involves the following participants:

  • Marketing director

Step 2.1

Define the Roadmap

Activities

2.1.1 Create the roadmap for the lead gen optimization strategy

This step will walk you through the following activities:

Create the optimization roadmap for your lead gen engine strategy.

This step involves the following participants:

  • Marketing director

Outcomes of this step

Strategy roadmap

2.1.1 Create the roadmap for the lead gen optimization strategy

1 hour

  1. Copy the results from "The Lead Gen Engine Diagnostic Scorecard" slide to the "Value, Resources & Roadmap Matrix" slide in the Lead Gen Engine Optimization Strategy Template. Adjust the Roadmap Quarter column after evaluating the internal resources of your company and expected value generated.
  2. Using these results, create your strategy roadmap by updating the slide entitled “The Strategy Roadmap” in the Lead Gen Engine Optimization Strategy Template.

Input

Output

  • Diagnostic scorecard
  • Strategy roadmap

Materials

Participants

  • Lead Gen Engine Optimization Strategy Template
  • Marketing Director

Download the Lead Gen Engine Optimization Strategy Template

Step 2.2

Create the Lead Gen Engine Optimization Strategy

Activities

2.2.1 Customize your lead gen engine optimization strategy using the template

This step will walk you through the following activities:

Create a lead gen engine optimization strategy based on the results of your diagnostic scorecard.

This step involves the following participants:

Marketing director

Outcomes of this step

A leadership-facing lead gen optimization strategy

2.2.1 Customize your lead gen engine optimization strategy using the template

2-3 hours

Review the strategy template:

  1. Use "The Strategy Roadmap" slide to organize the remaining slides from the Q1, Q2, and Q3 sections.
    1. Fixes listed in "The Strategy Roadmap" under Q1 should be placed within the Q1 section.
    2. Fixes listed in "The Strategy Roadmap" under Q2 should be placed within the Q2 section.
    3. Fixes listed in "The Strategy Roadmap" under Q3 should be placed within the Q3 section.

Input

Output

  • The strategy roadmap
  • Your new lead gen engine optimization strategy

Materials

Participants

  • Lead Gen Engine Optimization Strategy Template
  • Marketing director

Download the Lead Gen Engine Optimization Strategy Template

Step 2.3

Present the strategy to the steering committee

Activities

2.3.1 Present the findings of the diagnostic and the lead gen optimization strategy to the steering committee.

This step will walk you through the following activities:

Get executive buy-in on the lead gen engine optimization strategy.

This step involves the following participants:

  • Marketing director
  • Steering committee

Outcomes of this step

  • Buy-in from leadership on the strategy

2.3.1 Present findings of diagnostic and lead gen optimization strategy to steering committee

1-2 hours

  1. Schedule a presentation to present the findings of the diagnostic, the lead gen engine optimization strategy, and the roadmap to the steering committee.
InputOutput
  • Your company’s lead gen engine optimization strategy
  • Official outline of strategy and buy-in from executive leadership

Materials

Participants

  • Lead Gen Engine Optimization Strategy Template
  • Marketing director
  • Executive leadership
  • Steering committee

Download the Lead Gen Engine Optimization Strategy Template

Related SoftwareReviews Research

Create a Buyer Persona and Journey

Make it easier to market, sell, and achieve product-market fit with deeper buyer understanding.

  • Reduce time and treasure wasted chasing the wrong prospects.
  • Improve product-market fit.
  • Increase open and click-through rates in your lead gen engine.
  • Perform more effective sales discovery and increase eventual win rates.

Optimize Lead Generation With Lead Scoring

In today’s competitive environment, optimizing Sales’ resources by giving them qualified leads is key to B2B marketing success.

  • Lead scoring is a must-have capability for high-tech marketers.
  • Without lead scoring, marketers will see increased costs of lead generation and decreased SQL-to-opportunity conversion rates.
  • Lead scoring increases sales productivity and shortens sales cycles.

Build a More Effective Go-to-Market Strategy

Creating a compelling go-to-market strategy and keeping it current is a critical software company function – as important as financial strategy, sales operations, and even corporate business development – given its huge impact on the many drivers of sustainable growth.

  • Align stakeholders on a common vision and execution plan.
  • Build a foundation of buyer and competitive understanding.
  • Deliver a team-aligned launch plan that enables commercial success.

Bibliography

“11 Lead Magnet Statistics That Might Surprise You.” ClickyDrip, 28 Dec. 2020. Accessed April 2022.

“45 Conversion Rate Optimization Statistics Every Marketer Should Know.” Outgrow, n.d. Accessed April 2022.

Bailyn, Evan. “B2B SaaS Funnel Conversion Benchmarks.” First Page Sage, 24 Feb. 2021. Accessed April 2022.

Bailyn, Evan. “B2B SaaS Marketing KPIs: Behind the Numbers.” First Page Sage, 1 Sept. 2021. Accessed April 2022.

Conversion Optimization.” Lift Division, n.d. Accessed April 2022.

Corson, Sean. “LTV:CAC Ratio [2022 Guide] | Benchmarks, Formula, Tactics.” Daasity, 3 Nov. 2021. Accessed April 2022.

Dudley, Carrie. “What are personas?” Illumin8, 26 Jan. 2018. Accessed April 2022.

Godin, Seth. “Permission Marketing.” Accenture, Oct. 2009. Accessed April 2022.

Lebo, T. “Lead Conversion Statistics All B2B Marketers Need to Know.” Convince & Convert, n.d. Accessed April 2022.

Lister, Mary. “33 CRO & Landing Page Optimization Stats to Fuel Your Strategy.” WordStream, 24 Nov. 2021. [Accessed April 2022].

Nacach, Jamie. “How to Determine How Much Money to Spend on Lead Generation Software Per Month.” Bloominari, 18 Sept. 2018. Accessed April 2022.

Needle, Flori. “11 Stats That Make a Case for Landing Pages.” HubSpot, 10 June 2021. Accessed April 2022.

Payne, Kevin. “10 Effective Lead Nurturing Tactics to Boost Your Sales.” Kevintpayne.com, n.d. Accessed April 2022.

Tam, Edwin. “ROI in Marketing: Lifetime Value (LTV) & Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC).” Construct Digital, 19 Jan. 2016. Accessed April 2022.

Prototype With an Innovation Design Sprint

  • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}90|cart{/j2store}
  • member rating overall impact: N/A
  • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
  • member rating average days saved: N/A
  • Parent Category Name: Innovation
  • Parent Category Link: /innovation
  • The business has a mandate for IT-led innovation.
  • IT doesn’t have the budget it wants for high-risk, high-reward initiatives.
  • Many innovation projects have failed in the past.
  • Many projects that have moved through the approval process failed to meet their expectations.

Our Advice

Critical Insight

  • Don’t let perfect be the enemy of good. Think like a start-up and use experimentation and rapid re-iteration to get your innovative ideas off the ground.

Impact and Result

  • Build and test a prototype in four days using Info-Tech’s Innovation Design Sprint Methodology.
  • Create an environment for co-creation between IT and the business.
  • Learn techniques for socializing and selling your ideas to business stakeholders.
  • Refine your prototype through rapid iteration and user-experience testing.
  • Socialize design thinking culture, tactics, and methods with the business.

Prototype With an Innovation Design Sprint Research & Tools

Start here – read the Executive Brief

Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should evaluate your ideas using a design sprint, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

1. Understand and ideate

Define the problem and start ideating potential solutions.

  • Prototype With an Innovation Design Sprint – Day 1: Understand and Ideate
  • Prototyping Workbook

2. Divide and conquer

Split off into prototyping teams to build and test the first-iteration prototypes

  • Prototype With an Innovation Design Sprint – Day 2: Divide and Conquer
  • Research Study Log Tool

3. Unite and integrate

Integrate the best ideas from the first iterations and come up with a team solution to the problem.

  • Prototype With an Innovation Design Sprint – Day 3: Unite and Integrate
  • Prototype One Pager

4. Build and sell

Build and test the team’s integrated prototype, decide on next steps, and come up with a pitch to sell the solution to business executives.

  • Prototype With an Innovation Design Sprint – Day 4: Build and Sell
[infographic]

Workshop: Prototype With an Innovation Design Sprint

Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

1 Understand and Ideate

The Purpose

Align the team around a well-defined business problem and start ideating solutions.

Key Benefits Achieved

Ideate solutions in the face of organizational cconstraints and characterize the success of the prototype.

Activities

1.1 Frame the problem.

1.2 Develop evaluation criteria.

1.3 Diverge and converge.

Outputs

Problem statement(s)

Evaluation criteria

Ideated solutions

2 Divide and Conquer

The Purpose

Break off into teams to try and develop solutions that address the problem in unique ways.

Key Benefits Achieved

Develop and test a first-iteration prototype.

Activities

2.1 Design first prototypes in teams.

2.2 Conduct UX testing.

Outputs

First-iteration prototypes

User feedback and data

3 Unite and Integrate

The Purpose

Bring the team back together to develop a team vision of the final prototype.

Key Benefits Achieved

Integrated, second-iteration prototype.

Activities

3.1 Create and deliver prototype pitches.

3.2 Integrate prototypes.

Outputs

Prototype practice pitches

Second-iteration prototype

4 Build and Sell

The Purpose

Build and test the second prototype and prepare to sell it to business executives.

Key Benefits Achieved

Second-iteration prototype and a budget pitch.

Activities

4.1 Conduct second round of UX testing.

4.2 Create one pager and budget pitch.

Outputs

User feedback and data

Prototype one pager and budget pitch

IT Project Management Lite

  • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}187|cart{/j2store}
  • member rating overall impact: N/A
  • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
  • member rating average days saved: N/A
  • Parent Category Name: Project Management Office
  • Parent Category Link: /project-management-office
  • Organizations want reliable project reporting and clear, consistent project management standards, but many are unwilling or unable to allocate time for it.
  • Many IT project managers are given project management responsibilities in addition to other full-time roles – without any formal allocation of time, authority, or training.
  • Most IT project managers and stakeholders actually want clear and consistent standards but resist tools and procedures they believe are too time consuming and inflexible.
  • Standard project management procedures must be “light” enough for project managers to adapt to a wide range of projects without increasing the total time required to manage projects successfully.

Our Advice

Critical Insight

  • Most IT project management advice is focused on the largest 10-20% of projects – projects with large enough budgets to allocate time to project management. This leaves most IT projects (and most people who manage IT projects) in limbo between high-risk ad hoc management and high-cost project management best practices.
  • Project management success doesn’t equate to project success. While formal methodologies are a key ingredient in the success of large, complex projects, most IT projects do not require the same degree of rigorous record-keeping and planning.
  • Consistent, timely, and accurate reporting is the “linchpin” in any sustainable project and portfolio management practice.

Impact and Result

  • Maintain timely and accurate project portfolio reporting with right-sized tools and processes.
  • Establish clear and consistent project management standards that make better use of time already spent managing projects.
  • Enable project managers to manage their projects more successfully with a set of flexible and lightweight tools and templates.

IT Project Management Lite Research & Tools

Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

1. Assess the value of a minimum-viable PMO strategy

Perform a measured value assessment for building and managing a minimum-viable PMO.

  • IT Project Management Lite Storyboard

2. Perform a project and portfolio needs assessment

Focus on the minimum required to maintain accuracy of portfolio reporting and effectiveness in managing projects.

  • Minimum-Viable PMO Needs Assessment

3. Establish standards for realistic, accurate, and consistent portfolio reporting

Emphasize reporting high-level project status as a way to identify and address issues to achieve the best results with the least effort.

  • Minimum-Viable Project and Portfolio Management SOP

4. Create a standard, right-sized project management toolkit

Free PMs to focus on actually managing the project while still delivering accurate portfolio metrics.

  • Zero-Allocation Project Management Workbook

5. Train PMs for zero allocation

Ensure project manager compliance with the portfolio reporting process by incorporating activities that create value.

  • Zero-Allocation Project Manager Development Plan
  • Zero-Allocation Project Management Survival Guide

6. Perform a post-implementation assessment

Evaluate success and identify opportunities for further improvement.

Infographic

Workshop: IT Project Management Lite

Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

1 Preparation

The Purpose

Define goals and success criteria.

Finalize agenda.

Gather information: update project and resource lists (Info-Tech recommends using the Project Portfolio Workbook).

Key Benefits Achieved

More efficiently organized and executed workshop.

Able to better customize and tailor content to your specific needs.

Activities

1.1 Discuss specific pain points with regards to project manager allocations

1.2 Review project lists, tools and templates, and other documents

1.3 Map existing strategies to Info-Tech’s framework

Outputs

Understanding of where efforts must be focused in workshop

Assessment of what existing tools and templates may need to be included in zero-allocation workbook

Revisions that need to be made based on existing strategies

2 Make the Case and Assess Needs

The Purpose

Assess current state (including review of project and resource lists).

Discuss and analyze SWOT around project and portfolio management.

Define target state.

Define standards / SOP / processes for project and portfolio management.

Key Benefits Achieved

Gain perspective on how well your processes match up with the amount of time your project managers have for their PM duties.

Determine the value of the time and effort that your project teams are investing in project management activities.

Begin to define resource optimized processes for zero-allocation project managers.

Ensure consistent implementation of processes across your portfolio.

Establish project discipline and best practices that are grounded in actual project capacity.

Activities

2.1 Perform and/or analyze Minimum-Viable PMO Needs Assessment

2.2 SWOT analysis

2.3 Identify target allocations for project management activities

2.4 Begin to define resource optimized processes for zero-allocation project managers

Outputs

Current state analysis based on Minimum-Viable PMO Needs Assessment

Overview of current strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats

Target state analysis based on Minimum-Viable PMO Needs Assessment

A refined Minimum-Viable Project and Portfolio Management SOP

3 Establish Strategy

The Purpose

Select and customize project and portfolio management toolkit.

Implement (test/pilot) toolkit and processes.

Customize project manager training plan.

Evaluate and refine toolkit and processes as needed.

Key Benefits Achieved

Ensure consistent implementation of processes across your portfolio.

Establish project discipline and best practices that are grounded in actual project capacity.

A customized training session that will suit the needs of your project managers.

Activities

3.1 Customize the Zero-Allocation Toolkit to accommodate the needs of your projects

3.2 Test toolkit on projects currently underway

3.3 Tweak project manager training to suit the needs of your team

Outputs

Customized Zero-Allocation Project Management Workbook

A tested and standardized copy of the workbook

A customized training session for your project managers (to take place on Day 4 of Info-Tech’s workshop)

4 Train Your Zero-Allocation Project Managers

The Purpose

Communicate project and portfolio management SOP to Project Managers.

Deliver project manager training: standards for portfolio reporting and toolkit.

Key Benefits Achieved

Equip project managers to improve their level of discipline and documentation without spending more time in record keeping and task management.

Execute a successful training session that clearly and succinctly communicates your minimal and resource-optimized processes.

Activities

4.1 Project Manager Training, including communication of the processes and standard templates and reports that will be adopted by all project managers

Outputs

Educated and disciplined project managers, aware of the required processes for portfolio reporting

5 Assess Strategy and Next Steps

The Purpose

Debrief from the training session.

Plan for ongoing evaluation and improvement.

Evaluate and refine toolkit and processes if needed.

Answer any remaining questions.

Key Benefits Achieved

Assess portfolio and project manager performance in light of the strategy implemented.

Understanding of how to keep living documents like the workbook and SOP up to date.

Clearly defined next steps.

Activities

5.1 Review the customized tools and templates

5.2 Send relevant documentation to relevant stakeholders

5.3 Schedule review call

5.4 Schedule follow-up call with analysts to discuss progress in six months

Outputs

Finalized workbook and processes

Satisfied and informed stakeholders

Scheduled review call

Scheduled follow-up call

Document Business Goals and Capabilities for Your IT Strategy

  • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}77|cart{/j2store}
  • member rating overall impact: N/A
  • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
  • member rating average days saved: N/A
  • Parent Category Name: IT Strategy
  • Parent Category Link: /it-strategy
  • As a strategic driver, IT needs to work with the business. Yet, traditionally IT has not worked hand-in-hand with the business. IT does not know what information it needs from the business to execute on its initiatives.
  • A faster time to new investment decisions mean that IT needs a repeatable and efficient process to understand what the business needs.
  • CIOs must execute strategic initiatives to create an IT function that can support the business. Most CIOs fail because of low business support.

Our Advice

Critical Insight

  • Understanding the business context is a must for all strategic IT initiatives. At its core, each strategic IT project requires answers to a specific set of questions regarding the business.
  • An effective CIO understands which part of the business context applies to which strategic IT project and, in turn, what questions to ask to uncover those insights.

Impact and Result

  • Uncover what IT knows and needs to know about the business context. This is a necessary first step to begin each of Info-Tech’s strategic IT initiatives, which any CIO should complete.
  • Conduct efficient and repeatable business context discovery activities to uncover business context gaps.
  • Document the business context you have uncovered and streamline the process for executing on Info-Tech’s strategic CIO blueprints.

Document Business Goals and Capabilities for Your IT Strategy Research & Tools

Start here – read the Executive Brief

Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should define the business context, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand how we can support you in completing key CIO strategic initiatives.

Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

1. Identify and document the business needs of the organization

Define the business context needed to complete strategic IT initiatives.

  • Document Business Goals and Capabilities for Your IT Strategy – Storyboard
  • Business Context Discovery Tool
  • Business Context Discovery Record Template
  • PESTLE Analysis Template
  • Strategy Alignment Map Template
[infographic]

Workshop: Document Business Goals and Capabilities for Your IT Strategy

Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

1 Identify the Missing Business Context (pre-work)

The Purpose

Conduct analysis and facilitate discussions to uncover business needs for IT.

Key Benefits Achieved

A baseline understanding of what business needs mean for IT

Activities

1.1 Define the strategic CIO initiatives our organization will pursue.

1.2 Complete the Business Context Discovery Tool.

1.3 Schedule relevant interviews.

1.4 Select relevant Info-Tech diagnostics to conduct.

Outputs

Business context scope

Completed Business Context Discovery Tool

Completed Info-Tech diagnostics

2 Uncover and Document the Missing Context

The Purpose

Analyze the outputs from step 1 and uncover the business context gaps.

Key Benefits Achieved

A thorough understanding of business needs and why IT should pursue certain initiatives

Activities

2.1 Conduct group or one-on-one interviews to identify the missing pieces of the business context.

Outputs

Documentation of answers to business context gaps

3 Uncover and Document the Missing Context

The Purpose

Analyze the outputs from step 1 and uncover the business context gaps.

Key Benefits Achieved

A thorough understanding of business needs and why IT should pursue certain initiatives

Activities

3.1 Conduct group or one-on-one interviews to identify the missing pieces of the business context.

Outputs

Documentation of answers to business context gaps

4 Review Business Context and Next Steps

The Purpose

Review findings and implications for IT’s strategic initiative.

Key Benefits Achieved

A thorough understanding of business needs and how IT’s strategic initiatives addresses those needs

Activities

4.1 Review documented business context with IT team.

4.2 Discuss next steps for strategic CIO initiative execution.

Outputs

Finalized version of the business context

Create a Post-Implementation Plan for Microsoft 365

  • member rating overall impact: N/A
  • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
  • member rating average days saved: N/A
  • Parent Category Name: End-User Computing Applications
  • Parent Category Link: /end-user-computing-applications

M365 projects are fraught with obstacles. Common mistakes organizations make include:

  • Not having a post-migration plan in place.
  • Treating user training as an afterthought.
  • Inadequate communication to end users.

Our Advice

Critical Insight

There are three primary areas where organizations fail in a successful implementation of M365: training, adoption, and information governance. While it is not up to IT to ensure every user is well trained, it is their initial responsibility to find champions, SMEs, and business-based trainers and manage information governance from the backup, retention, and security aspects of data management.

Impact and Result

Migrating to M365 is a disruptive move for most organizations. It poses risk to untrained IT staff, including admins, help desk, and security teams. The aim for organizations, especially in this new hybrid workspace, is to maintain efficiencies through collaboration, share information in a secure environment, and work from anywhere, any time.

Create a Post-Implementation Plan for Microsoft 365 Research & Tools

Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

1. Create a Post-Implementation Plan for Microsoft 365 Storyboard – A deck that guides you through the important considerations that will help you avoid common pitfalls and make the most of your investment.

There are three primary goals when deploying Microsoft 365: productivity, security and compliance, and collaborative functionality. On top of these you need to meet the business KPIs and IT’s drive for adoption and usage. This research will guide you through the important considerations that are often overlooked as this powerful suite of tools is rolled out to the organization.

[infographic]

Further reading

Create a Post-Implementation Plan for Microsoft 365

You’ve deployed M365. Now what? Look at your business goals and match your M365 KPIs to meet those objectives.

Analyst perspective

You’ve deployed M365. Now what?

John Donovan

There are three primary objectives when deploying Microsoft 365: from a business perspective, the expectations are based on productivity; from an IT perspective, the expectations are based on IT efficiencies, security, and compliance; and from an organizational perspective, they are based on a digital employee experience and collaborative functionality.

Of course, all these expectations are based on one primary objective, and that is user adoption of Teams, OneDrive, and SharePoint Online. A mass adoption, along with a high usage rate and a change in the way users work, is required for your investment in M365 to be considered successful.

So, adoption is your first step, and that can be tracked and analyzed through analytics in M365 or other tools. But what else needs to be considered once you have released M365 on your organization? What about backup? What about security? What about sharing data outside your business? What about self-service? What about ongoing training? M365 is a powerful suite of tools, and taking advantage of all that it entails should be IT’s primary goal. How to accomplish that, efficiently and securely, is up to you!

John Donovan
Principal Research Director, I&O
Info-Tech Research Group

Insight summary

Collaboration, efficiencies, and cost savings need to be earned

Migrating to M365 is a disruptive move for most organizations. Additionally, it poses risk to untrained IT staff, including admins, help desk, and security teams. The aim for organizations, especially in this new hybrid workspace, is to maintain efficiencies through collaboration, share information in a secure environment, and work from anywhere, any time. However, organizations need to manage their licensing and storage costs and build this new way of working through post-deployment planning. By reducing their hardware and software footprint they can ensure they have earned these savings and efficiencies.

Understand any shortcomings in M365 or pay the price

Failing to understand any shortcomings M365 poses for your organization can ruin your chances at a successful implementation. Commonly overlooked expenses include backup and archiving, especially for regulated organizations; spending on risk mitigation through third-party tools for security; and paying a premium to Microsoft to use its Azure offerings with Microsoft Sentinel, Microsoft Defender, or any security add-on that comes at a price above your E5 license, which is expensive in itself.

Spend time with users to understand how they will use M365

Understanding business processes is key to anticipating how your end users will adopt M365. By spending time with the staff and understanding their day-to-day activities and interactions, you can build better training scenarios to suit their needs and help them understand how the apps in M365 can help them do their job. On top of this you need to meet the business KPIs and IT’s drive for adoption and usage. Encourage early adopters to become trainers and champions. Success will soon follow.

Executive summary

Your Challenge

Common Obstacles

Info-Tech’s Approach

M365 is a full suite of tools for collaboration, communication, and productivity, but organizations find the platform is not used to its full advantage and fail to get full value from their license subscription.

Many users are unsure which tool to use when: Do you use Teams or Viva Engage, MS Project or Planner? When do you use SharePoint versus OneDrive?

From an IT perspective, finding time to help users at the outset is difficult – it’s quite the task to set up governance, security, and backup. Yet training staff must be a priority if the implementation is to succeed.

M365 projects are fraught with obstacles. Common mistakes organizations make include:

  • No post-migration plan in place.
  • User training is an afterthought.
  • Lack of communication to end users.
  • No C-suite promotion and sponsorship.
  • Absence of a vision and KPIs to meet that vision.

To define your post-migration tasks and projects:

  • List all projects in a spreadsheet and rank them according to difficulty and impact.
  • Look for quick wins with easy tasks that have high impact and low difficulty.
  • Build a timeline to execute your plans and communicate clearly how these plans will impact the business and meet that vision.

Failure to take meaningful action will not bode well for your M365 journey.

Info-Tech Insight

There are three primary areas where organizations fail in a successful implementation of M365: training, adoption, and information governance. While it is not up to IT to ensure every user is well trained, it is their initial responsibility to find champions, SMEs, and business-based trainers and to manage information governance from backup, retention, and security aspects of data management.

Business priorities

What priorities is IT focusing on with M365 adoption?

What IT teams are saying

  • In a 2019 SoftwareONE survey, the biggest reason IT decision makers gave for adopting M365 was to achieve a “more collaborative working style.”
  • Organizations must plan and execute a strategy for mass adoption and training to ensure processes match business goals.
  • Cost savings can only be achieved through rightsizing license subscriptions, retiring legacy apps, and building efficiencies within the IT organization.
  • With increased mobility comes with increased cybersecurity risk. Make sure you take care of your security before prioritizing mobility. Multifactor authentication (MFA), conditional access (CA), and additional identity management will maintain a safe work-from-anywhere environment.

Top IT reasons for adopting M365

61% More collaborative working style

54% Cost savings

51% Improved cybersecurity

49% Greater mobility

Source: SoftwareONE, 2019; N=200 IT decision makers across multiple industries and organization sizes

Define & organize post-implementation projects

Key areas to success

  • Using Microsoft’s M365 adoption guide, we can prioritize and focus on solutions that will bring about better use of the M365 suite.
  • Most of your planning and prioritizing should be done before implementation. Many organizations, however, adopted M365 – and especially Teams, SharePoint Online, and OneDrive – in an ad hoc manner in response to the pandemic measures that forced users to work from home.
  • Use a Power BI Pro license to set up dashboards for M365 usage analytics. Install GitHub from AppSource and use the templates that will give you good insight and the ability to create business reports to show adoption and usage rates on the platform.
  • Reimagine your working behavior. Remember, you want to bring about a more collective and open framework for work. Take advantage of a champion SME to show the way. Every organization is different, so make sure your training is aligned to your business processes.
The image contains a screenshot of the M365 post-implementation tasks.

Process steps

Define Vision

Build Team

Plan Projects

Execute

Define your vision and what your priorities are for M365. Understand how to reach your vision.

Ensure you have an executive sponsor, develop champions, and build a team of SMEs.

List all projects in a to-be scenario. Rank and prioritize projects to understand impact and difficulty.

Build your roadmap, create timelines, and ensure you have enough resources and time to execute and deliver to the business.

Info-Tech’s approach

Use the out-of-the-box tools and take advantage of your subscription.

The image contains a screenshot of the various tools and services Microsoft provides.

Info-Tech Insight

A clear understanding of the business purpose and processes, along with insight into the organizational culture, will help you align the right apps with the right tasks. This approach will bring about better adoption and collaboration and cancel out the shadow IT products we see in every business silo.

Leverage built-in usage analytics

Adoption of services in M365

To give organizations insight into the adoption of services in M365, Microsoft provides built-in usage analytics in Power BI, with templates for visualization and custom reports. There are third-party tools out there, but why pay more? However, the template app is not free; you do need a Power BI Pro license.

Usage Analytics pulls data from ActiveDirectory, including location, department, and organization, giving you deeper insight into how users are behaving. It can collect up to 12 months of data to analyze.

Reports that can be created include Adoption, Usage, Communication, Collaboration (how OneDrive and SharePoint are being used), Storage (cloud storage for mailboxes, OneDrive, and SharePoint), and Mobility (which clients and devices are used to connect to Teams, email, Yammer, etc.).

Source: Microsoft 365 usage analytics

Understand admin roles

Prevent intentional or unintentional internal breaches

Admin Roles

Best Practices

  • Global admin: Assign this role only to users who need the most access to management features and data across your tenant. Only global admins can modify an admin role.
  • Exchange admin: Assign this role to users who need to view and manage user mailboxes, M365 groups, and Exchange Online and handle Microsoft support requests.
  • Groups admin: These users can create, edit, delete, and restore M365 groups as well as create expiration and naming policies.
  • Helpdesk admin: These users can resets passwords, force user sign-out, manage Microsoft support requests, and monitor service health.
  • Teams/SharePoint Online admin: Assign these roles for users who manage the Teams and SharePoint Admin Center.
  • User admin: These users can assign licenses, add users and groups, manage user properties, and create and manage user views.

Only assign two to four global admins, depending on the size of the organization. Too many admins increases security risk. In larger organizations, segment admin roles using role-based access control.

Because admins have access to sensitive data, you’ll want to assign the least permissive role so they can access only the tools and data they need to do their job.

Enable MFA for all admins except one break-glass account that is stored in the cloud and not synced. Ensure a complex password, stored securely, and use only in the event of an MFA outage.

Due to the large number of admin roles available and the challenges that brings with it, Microsoft has a built-in tool to compare roles in the admin portal. This can help you determine which role should be used for specific tasks.

Secure your M365 tenant

A checklist to ensure basic security coverage post M365

  • Multifactor Authentication: MFA is part of your M365 tenant, so using it should be a practical identity security. If you want additional conditional access (CA), you will require an Azure AD (AAD) Premium P1+ license. This will ensure adequate identity security protecting the business.
  • Password Protection: Use the AAD portal to set this up under Security > Authentication Methods. Microsoft provides a list of over 2,000 known bad passwords and variants to block.
  • Legacy Authentication: Disable legacy protocols; check to see if your legacy apps/workflows/scripts use them in the AAD portal. Once identified, update them and turn the protocols off. Use CA policies.
  • Self-Service Password Reset: Enable self-service to lower the helpdesk load for password resets. Users will have to initially register and set security questions. Hybrid AD businesses must write back to AD from AAD once changes are made.
  • Security Defaults: For small businesses, turn on default settings. To enable additional security settings, such as break- glass accounts, go into Manage Security Defaults in your AAD properties.
  • Conditional Access (CA) Policies: Use CA policies if strong identity security and zero trust are required. To create policies in AAD go to Security > Conditional Access > New Policies.

Identity Checklist

  • Enable MFA for Admins
  • Enable MFA for Users
  • Disable App Passwords
  • Configure Trusted IPs
  • Disable Text/Phone MFA
  • Remember MFA on Trusted Devices for 90 Days
  • Train Staff in Using MFA Correctly
  • Integrate Apps Into Azure AD

Training guidelines

Identify business scenarios and training adoption KPIs

  • Customize your training to meet your organizational goals, align with your business culture, and define how users will work inside the world of M365.
  • Create scenario templates that align to your current day-to-day operations in each department. These can be created by individual business unit champions.
  • Make sure you have covered must-have capabilities and services within M365 that need to be rolled out post-pilot.
  • Phase in large transitions rather than multiple small ones to ensure collaboration between departments meets business scenarios.
  • Ensure your success metrics are being measured and continue to communicate and train after deployment using tools available in M365. See Microsoft’s adoption guidelines and template for training.

Determine your training needs and align with your business processes. Choose training modalities that will give users the best chance of success. Consider one or many training methods, such as:

  • Online training
  • In-person classroom
  • Business scenario use cases
  • Mentoring
  • Department champion/Early adopter
  • Weekly bulletin fun facts

Don’t forget backup!

Providing 99% uptime and availability is not enough

Why is M365 backup so important?

Accidental Data Deletion.

If a user is deleted, that deletion gets replicated across the network. Backup can save you here by restoring that user.

Internal and External Security Threats.

Malicious internal deletion of data and external threats including viruses, ransomware, and malware can severely damage a business and its reputation. A clean backup can easily restore the business’ uninfected data.

Legal and Compliance Requirements.

While e-discovery and legal hold are available to retain sensitive data, a third-party backup solution can easily search and restore all data to meet regulatory requirements – without depending on someone to ensure a policy was set.

Retention Policy Gaps.

Retention policies are not a substitute for backup. While they can be used to retain or delete content, they are difficult to keep track of and manage. Backups offer greater latitude in retention and better security for that data.

Retire your legacy apps to gain adoption

Identify like for like and retire your legacy apps

Legacy

Microsoft 365

SharePoint 2016/19

SharePoint Online

Microsoft Exchange Server

Microsoft Exchange in Azure

Skype for Business Server

Teams

Trello

Planner 2022

System Center Configuration Manager (SCCM)

Endpoint Manager, Intune, Autopilot

File servers

OneDrive

Access

Power Apps

To meet the objectives of cost reduction and rationalization, look at synergies that M365 brings to the table. Determine what you are currently using to meet collaboration, storage, and security needs and plan to use the equivalent in your Microsoft entitlement.

Managing M365’s hidden costs

Licenses and storage limits TCO

  • Email security. Ninety-one percent of all cyberattacks come from phishing on email. Microsoft Defender for M365 is a bolt-on, so it is an additional cost.
  • Backup. This will bring additional cost to M365. Plan to spend more to ensure data is backed up and stored.
  • Email archiving. Archiving is different than backup. See our research on the subject. Archiving is needed for compliance purposes. Email archiving solutions are available through third-party software, which is an added cost.
  • Email end-to-end encryption. This is a requirement for all organizations that are serious about security. The enterprise products from Microsoft come at an additional cost.
  • Cybersecurity training. IT needs to ramp up on training, another expense.
  • Microsoft 365 Power Platform Licencing. From low-code and no-code developer tools (Power Apps), workflow tools (Power Automate), and business intelligence (Power BI) – while the E5 license gives you Power BI Pro, there are limitations and costs. Power BI Pro has limitations for data volume, data refresh, and query response time, so your premium license comes at a considerably marked up cost.

M365 is not standalone

  • While Microsoft 365 is a platform that is ”just good enough,” it is actually not good enough in today’s cyberthreat environment. Microsoft provides add-ons with Defender for 365, Purview, and Sentinel, which pose additional costs, just like a third-party solution would. See the Threat Intelligence & Incident Response research in our Security practice.
  • The lack of data archiving, backup, and encryption means additional costs that may not have been budgeted for at the outset. Microsoft provides 30-60-90-day recovery, but anything else is additional cost. For more information see Understand the Difference between Backups and Archiving.

Compliance and regulations

Security and compliance features out of the box

There are plenty of preconfigured security features contained in M365, but what’s available to you depends on your license. For example, Microsoft Defender, which has many preset policies, is built-in for E5 licenses, but if you have E3 licenses Defender is an add-on.

Three elements in security policies are profiles, policies, and policy settings.

  • Preset Profiles come in the shape of:
    • Standard – baseline protection for most users
    • Strict – aggressive protection for profiles that may be high-value targets
    • Built-in Protection – turned on by default; it is not recommended to make exceptions based on users, groups, or domains
  • Preset Security Policies
    • Exchange Online Protection Policies – anti-spam, -malware, and -phishing policies
    • Microsoft Defender Policies – safe links and safe attachments policies
  • Policy Settings
    • User impersonation protection for internal and external domains
    • Select priorities from strict, standard, custom, and built-in

Info-Tech Insight

Check your license entitlement before you start purchasing add-ons or third-party solutions. Security and compliance are not optional in today’s cybersecurity risk world. With many organizations offering hybrid and remote work arrangements and bring-your-own-device (BYOD) policies, it is necessary to protect your data at the tenant level. Defender for Microsoft 365 is a tool that can protect both your exchange and collaboration environments.

More information: Microsoft 365 Defender

Use Intune and Autopilot

Meet the needs of your hybrid workforce

  • Using the tools available in M365 can help you develop your hybrid or remote work strategy.
  • This strategy will help you maintain security controls for mobile and BYOD.
  • Migrating to Intune and Autopilot will give rise to the opportunity to migrate off SCCM and further reduce your on-premises infrastructure.

NOTE: You must have Azure AD Premium and Windows 10 V1703 or later as well as Intune or other MDM service to use Autopilot. There is a monthly usage fee based on volume of data transmitted. These fees can add up over time.

For more details visit the following Microsoft Learn pages:

Intune /Autopilot Overview

The image contains a screenshot of the Intune/Autopilot Overview.

Info-Tech’s research on zero-touch provisioning goes into more detail on Intune and Autopilot:
Simplify Remote Deployment With Zero-Touch Provisioning

M365 long-term strategies

Manage your costs in an inflationary world

  • Recent inflation globally, whether caused by supply chain woes or political uncertainty, will impact IT and cloud services along with everything else. Be prepared to pay more for your existing services and budget accordingly.
  • Your long-term strategies must include ongoing cost management, data management, security risks, and license and storage costs.
  • Continually investigate efficiencies, overlaps, and new tools in M365 that can get the job done for the business. Use as many of the applications as you can to ensure you are getting the best bang for your buck.
  • Watch for upgrades in the M365 suite of tools. As Microsoft continues to improve and deliver on most business applications well after their first release, you may find that something that was previously inefficient could work in your environment today and replace a tool you currently use.

Ongoing Activities You Need to Maintain

  • Be aware of increased license costs and higher storage costs.
  • Keep an eye on Teams sprawl.
  • Understand your total cost of ownership.
  • Continue to look at legacy apps and get rid of your infrastructure debt.

Activity

Build your own M365 post-migration plan

  1. Using slide 6 as your guideline, create your own project list using impact and difficulty as your weighting factors.
  2. Do this exercise as a whiteboard sticky note exercise to agree on impact and difficulty as a team.
  3. Identify easy wins that have high impact.
  4. Place the projects into a project plan with time lines.
  5. Agree on start and completion dates.
  6. Ensure you have the right resources to execute.

The image contains a screenshot of the activity described in the above text.

Related Info-Tech Research

Govern Office 365

  • Office 365 is as difficult to wrangle as it is valuable. Leverage best practices to produce governance outcomes aligned with your goals.

Drive Ongoing Adoption With an M365 Center of Excellence

  • Accelerate business processes change and get more value from your subscription by building and sharing, thanks to an effective center of excellence.

Simplify Remote Deployment With Zero-Touch Provisioning

  • Adopt zero-touch provisioning to provide better services to your end users.
  • Save time and resources during device deployment while providing a high-quality experience to remote end users.

Bibliography

“5 Reasons Why Microsoft Office 365 Backup Is Important.” Apps 4Rent, Dec 2021, Accessed Oct 2022 .
Chandrasekhar, Aishwarya. “Office 365 Migration Best Practices & Challenges 2022.” Saketa, 31 Mar 2022. Accessed Oct. 2022.
Chronlund, Daniel. “The Fundamental Checklist – Secure your Microsoft 365 Tenant”. Daniel Chronlund Cloud Tech Blog,1 Feb 2019. Accessed 1 Oct 2022.
Davies, Joe. “The Microsoft 365 Enterprise Deployment Guide.” Tech Community, Microsoft, 19 Sept 2018. Accessed 2 Oct 2022.
Dillaway, Kevin. “I Upgraded to Microsoft 365 E5, Now What?!.” SpyGlassMTG, 10 Jan 2022. Accessed 4 Oct. 2022.
Hartsel, Joe. “How to Make Your Office 365 Implementation Project a Success.” Centric, 20 Dec 2021. Accessed 2 Oct. 2022.
Jha, Mohit. “The Ultimate Microsoft Office 365 Migration Checklist for Pre & Post Migration.” Office365 Tips.Org, 24 June 2022. Accessed Sept. 2022.
Lang, John. “Why organizations don't realize the full value of Microsoft 365.“Business IT, 29 Nov 202I. Accessed 10 Oct 2022.
Mason, Quinn. “How to increase Office 365 / Microsoft 365 user adoption.” Sharegate, 19 Sept 2019. Accessed 3 Oct 2022.
McDermott, Matt. “6-Point Office 365 Post-Migration Checklist.” Spanning , 12 July 2019 . Accessed 4 Oct 2022.
“Microsoft 365 usage analytics.” Microsoft 365, Microsoft, 25 Oct 2022. Web.
Sharma, Megha. “Office 365 Pre & Post Migration Checklist.’” Kernel Data Recovery, 26 July 2022. Accessed 30 Sept. 2022.
Sivertsen, Per. “How to avoid a failed M365 implementation? Infotechtion, 19 Dec 2021. Accessed 2 Oct. 2022.
St. Hilaire, Dan. “Most Common Mistakes with Office 365 Deployment (and How to Avoid Them).“ KnowledgeWave, 4Mar 2019. Accessed Oct. 2022.
“Under the Hood of Microsoft 365 and Office 365 Adoption.” SoftwareONE, 2019. Web.

Demystify Blockchain: How Can It Bring Value to Your Organization?

  • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}96|cart{/j2store}
  • member rating overall impact: N/A
  • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
  • member rating average days saved: N/A
  • Parent Category Name: Innovation
  • Parent Category Link: /innovation
  • Most leaders have an ambiguous understanding of blockchain and its benefits, let alone how it impacts their organization.
  • At the same time, with bitcoin drawing most of the media attention, organizations are finding it difficult to translate cryptocurrency usage to business case.

Our Advice

Critical Insight

  • Cut through the hype associated with blockchain by focusing on what is relevant to your organization. You have been hearing about blockchain for some time now and want to better understand it. While it is complex, you can beat the learning curve by analyzing its key benefits and purpose. Features such as transparency, efficiency, and security differentiate blockchain from existing technologies and help explain why it has transformative potential.
  • Ensure your use case is actually useful by first determining whether blockchain aligns with your organization. CIOs must take a practical approach to blockchain in order to avoid wasting resources (both time and money) and hurting IT’s image in the eyes of the business. While is easy to get excited and invest in a new technology to help maintain your image as a thought leader, you must ensure that your use case is fully developed prior to doing so.

Impact and Result

  • Follow Info-Tech’s methodology for simplifying an otherwise complex concept. By focusing on its benefits and how they directly relate to a use case, blockchain technology is made easy to understand for business and IT professionals.
  • Our program will help you understand if blockchain is the optimal solution for your organization by mapping its key benefits (i.e. transparency, integrity, efficiency, and security) to your needs and capabilities.
  • Leverage a repeatable framework for brainstorming blockchain use case ideas and communicate your findings to business stakeholders who may otherwise be confused about the transformative potential of blockchain.

Demystify Blockchain: How Can It Bring Value to Your Organization? Research & Tools

Start here – read the Executive Brief

Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why your organization should care about determining whether blockchain aligns with your organization, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

1. What exactly is blockchain?

Understand blockchain’s unique feature, benefits, and business use cases.

  • Demystify Blockchain – Phase 1: What Is Blockchain?
  • Blockchain Glossary

2. What can blockchain do for your organization?

Envision blockchain’s transformative potential for your organization by brainstorming and validating a use case.

  • Demystify Blockchain – Phase 2: What Can Blockchain Do for Your Organization?
  • Blockchain Alignment Tool
  • Blockchain Alignment Presentation
[infographic]

Integrate Threat Intelligence Into Your Security Operations

  • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}320|cart{/j2store}
  • member rating overall impact: 9.0/10 Overall Impact
  • member rating average dollars saved: 2 Average Days Saved
  • member rating average days saved: After each Info-Tech experience, we ask our members to quantify the real-time savings, monetary impact, and project improvements our research helped them achieve.
  • Parent Category Name: Threat Intelligence & Incident Response
  • Parent Category Link: /threat-intelligence-incident-response
  • Organizations have limited visibility into their threat landscape, and as such are vulnerable to the latest attacks, hindering business practices, workflow, revenue generation, and damaging their public image.
  • Organizations are developing ad hoc intelligence capabilities that result in operational inefficiencies, the misalignment of resources, and the misuse of their security technology investments.
  • It is difficult to communicate the value of a threat intelligence solution when trying to secure organizational buy-in and the appropriate resourcing.
  • There is a vast array of “intelligence” in varying formats, often resulting in information overload.

Our Advice

Critical Insight

  1. Information alone is not actionable. A successful threat intelligence program contextualizes threat data, aligns intelligence with business objectives, and then builds processes to satisfy those objectives.
  2. Your security controls are diminishing in value (if they haven’t already). As technology in the industry evolves, threat actors will inevitably adopt new tools, tactics, and procedures; a threat intelligence program can provide relevant situational awareness to stay on top of the rapidly-evolving threat landscape.
  3. Your organization might not be the final target, but it could be a primary path for attackers. If you exist as a third-party partner to another organization, your responsibility in your technology ecosystem extends beyond your own product/service offerings. Threat intelligence provides visibility into the latest threats, which can help you avoid becoming a backdoor in the next big data breach.

Impact and Result

  • Assess the needs and intelligence requirements of key stakeholders.
  • Garner organizational buy-in from senior management.
  • Identify organizational intelligence gaps and structure your efforts accordingly.
  • Understand the different collection solutions to identify which best supports your needs.
  • Optimize the analysis process by leveraging automation and industry best practices.
  • Establish a comprehensive threat knowledge portal.
  • Define critical threat escalation protocol.
  • Produce and share actionable intelligence with your constituency.
  • Create a deployment strategy to roll out the threat intelligence program.
  • Integrate threat intelligence within your security operations.

Integrate Threat Intelligence Into Your Security Operations Research & Tools

Start here – read the Executive Brief

Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should implement a threat intelligence program, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

1. Plan for a threat intelligence program

Assess current capabilities and define an ideal target state.

  • Integrate Threat Intelligence Into Your Security Operations – Phase 1: Plan for a Threat Intelligence Program
  • Security Pressure Posture Analysis Tool
  • Threat Intelligence Maturity Assessment Tool
  • Threat Intelligence Project Charter Template
  • Threat Intelligence RACI Tool
  • Threat Intelligence Management Plan Template
  • Threat Intelligence Policy Template

2. Design an intelligence collection strategy

Understand the different collection solutions to identify which best supports needs.

  • Integrate Threat Intelligence Into Your Security Operations – Phase 2: Design an Intelligence Collection Strategy
  • Threat Intelligence Prioritization Tool
  • Threat Intelligence RFP MSSP Template

3. Optimize the intelligence analysis process

Begin analyzing and acting on gathered intelligence.

  • Integrate Threat Intelligence Into Your Security Operations – Phase 3: Optimize the Intelligence Analysis Process
  • Threat Intelligence Malware Runbook Template

4. Design a collaboration and feedback program

Stand up an intelligence dissemination program.

  • Integrate Threat Intelligence Into Your Security Operations – Phase 4: Design a Collaboration and Feedback Program
  • Threat Intelligence Alert Template
  • Threat Intelligence Alert and Briefing Cadence Schedule Template
[infographic]

Build an IT Risk Management Program

  • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}192|cart{/j2store}
  • member rating overall impact: 8.3/10 Overall Impact
  • member rating average dollars saved: $31,532 Average $ Saved
  • member rating average days saved: 17 Average Days Saved
  • Parent Category Name: IT Governance, Risk & Compliance
  • Parent Category Link: /it-governance-risk-and-compliance
  • Risk is unavoidable. Without a formal program to manage IT risk, you may be unaware of your severest IT risks.
  • The business could be making decisions that are not informed by risk.
  • Reacting to risks AFTER they occur can be costly and crippling, yet it is one of the most common tactics used by IT departments.

Our Advice

Critical Insight

  • IT risk is business risk. Every IT risk has business implications. Create an IT risk management program that shares accountability with the business.

Impact and Result

  • Transform your ad hoc IT risk management processes into a formalized, ongoing program, and increase risk management success.
  • Take a proactive stance against IT threats and vulnerabilities by identifying and assessing IT’s greatest risks before they occur.
  • Involve key stakeholders including the business senior management team to gain buy-in and to focus on IT risks most critical to the organization.

Build an IT Risk Management Program Research & Tools

Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

1. Build an IT Risk Management Program – A holistic approach to managing IT risks within your organization and involving key business stakeholders.

Gain business buy-in to understanding the key IT risks that could negatively impact the organization and create an IT risk management program to properly identify, assess, respond, monitor, and report on those risks.

  • Build an IT Risk Management Program – Phases 1-3

2. Risk Management Program Manual – A single source of truth for the risk management program to exist and be updated to reflect changes.

Leverage this Risk Management Program Manual to ensure that the decisions around how IT risks will be governed and managed can be documented in a single source accessible by those involved.

  • Risk Management Program Manual

3. Risk Register & Risk Costing Tool – A set of tools to document identified risk events. Assess each risk event and consider the appropriate response based on your organization’s threshold for risk.

Engage these tools in your organization if you do not currently have a GRC tool to document risk events as they relate to the IT function. Consider the best risk response to high severity risk events to ensure all possible situations are considered.

  • Risk Register Tool
  • Risk Costing Tool

4. Risk Event Action Plan and Risk Report – A template to document the chosen risk responses and ensure accountable owners agree on selected response method.

Establish clear guidelines and responses to risk events that will leave your organization vulnerable to unwanted threats. Ensure risk owners have agreed to the risk responses and are willing to take accountability for that response.

  • Risk Event Action Plan
  • Risk Report

Infographic

Workshop: Build an IT Risk Management Program

Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

1 Review IT Risk Fundamentals and Governance

The Purpose

To assess current risk management maturity, develop goals, and establish IT risk governance.

Key Benefits Achieved

Identified obstacles to effective IT risk management.

Established attainable goals to increase maturity.

Clearly laid out risk management accountabilities and responsibilities for IT and business stakeholders.

Activities

1.1 Assess current program maturity

1.2 Complete RACI chart

1.3 Create the IT risk council

1.4 Identify and engage key stakeholders

1.5 Add organization-specific risk scenarios

1.6 Identify risk events

Outputs

Maturity Assessment

Risk Management Program Manual

Risk Register

2 Identify IT Risks

The Purpose

Identify and assess all IT risks.

Key Benefits Achieved

Created a comprehensive list of all IT risk events.

Risk events prioritized according to risk severity – as defined by the business.

Activities

2.1 Identify risk events (continued)

2.2 Augment risk event list using COBIT 5 processes

2.3 Determine the threshold for (un)acceptable risk

2.4 Create impact and probability scales

2.5 Select a technique to measure reputational cost

2.6 Conduct risk severity level assessment

Outputs

Finalized List of IT Risk Events

Risk Register

Risk Management Program Manual

3 Identify IT Risks (continued)

The Purpose

Prioritize risks, establish monitoring responsibilities, and develop risk responses for top risks.

Key Benefits Achieved

Risk monitoring responsibilities are established.

Risk response strategies have been identified for all key risks.

Activities

3.1 Conduct risk severity level assessment

3.2 Document the proximity of the risk event

3.3 Conduct expected cost assessment

3.4 Develop key risk indicators (KRIs) and escalation protocols

3.5 Root cause analysis

3.6 Identify and assess risk responses

Outputs

Risk Register

Risk Management Program Manual

Risk Event Action Plans

4 Monitor, Report, and Respond to IT Risk

The Purpose

Assess and select risk responses for top risks and effectively communicate recommendations and priorities to the business.

Key Benefits Achieved

Thorough analysis has been conducted on the value and effectiveness of risk responses for high severity risk events.

Authoritative risk response recommendations can be made to senior leadership.

A finalized Risk Management Program Manual is ready for distribution to key stakeholders.

Activities

4.1 Identify and assess risk responses

4.2 Risk response cost-benefit analysis

4.3 Create multi-year cost projections

4.4 Review techniques for embedding risk management in IT

4.5 Finalize the Risk Report and Risk Management Program Manual

4.6 Transfer ownership of risk responses to project managers

Outputs

Risk Report

Risk Management Program Manual

Further reading

Build an IT Risk Management Program

Mitigate the IT risks that could negatively impact your organization.

Table of Contents

3 Executive Brief

4 Analyst Perspective

5 Executive Summary

19 Phase 1: Review IT Risk Fundamentals & Governance

43 Phase 2: Identify and Assess IT Risk

74 Phase 3: Monitor, Communicate, and Respond to IT Risk

102 Appendix

108 Bibliography

Build an IT Risk Management Program

Mitigate the IT risks that could negatively impact your organization.

EXECUTIVE BRIEF

Analyst Perspective

Siloed risks are risky business for any enterprise.

Photo of Valence Howden, Principal Research Director, CIO Practice.
Valence Howden
Principal Research Director, CIO Practice
Photo of Brittany Lutes, Senior Research Analyst, CIO Practice.
Brittany Lutes
Senior Research Analyst, CIO Practice

Risk is an inherent part of life but not very well understood or executed within organizations. This has led to risk being avoided or, when it’s implemented, being performed in isolated siloes with inconsistencies in understanding of impact and terminology.

Looking at risk in an integrated way within an organization drives a truer sense of the thresholds and levels of risks an organization is facing – making it easier to manage and leverage risk while reducing risks associated with different mitigation responses to the same risk events.

This opens the door to using risk information – not only to prevent negative impacts but as a strategic differentiator in decision making. It helps you know which risks are worth taking, driving strong positive outcomes for your organization.

Executive Summary

Your Challenge

IT has several challenges when it comes to addressing risk management:

  • Risk is unavoidable. Without a formal program to manage IT risk, you may be unaware of your severest IT risks.
  • The business could be making decisions that are not informed by risk.
  • Reacting to risks after they occur can be costly and crippling, yet it is one of the most common tactics used by IT departments.

Common Obstacles

Many IT organizations realize these obstacles:

  • IT risks and business risks are often addressed separately, causing inconsistencies in the approach.
  • Security risk receives such a high profile that it often eclipses other important IT risks, leaving the organization vulnerable.
  • Failing to include the business in IT risk management leaves IT leaders too accountable; the business must have accountability as well.

Info-Tech’s Approach

  • Transform your ad hoc IT risk management processes into a formalized, ongoing program and increase risk management success.
  • Take a proactive stance against IT threats and vulnerabilities by identifying and assessing IT’s greatest risks before they occur.
  • Involve key stakeholders, including the business senior management team, to gain buy-in and to focus on the IT risks most critical to the organization.

Info-Tech Insight

IT risk is business risk. Every IT risk has business implications. Create an IT risk management program that shares accountability with the business.

Ad hoc approaches to managing risk fail because…

If you are like the majority of IT departments, you do not have a consistent and comprehensive strategy for managing IT risk.

  1. Ad hoc risk management is reactionary.
  2. Ad hoc risk management is often focused only on IT security.
  3. Ad hoc risk management lacks alignment with business objectives.

The results:

  • Increased business risk exposure caused by a lack of understanding of the impact of IT risks on the business.
  • Increased IT non-compliance, resulting in costly settlements and fines.
  • IT audit failure.
  • Ineffective management of risk caused by poor risk information and wrong risk response decisions.
  • Increased unnecessary and avoidable IT failures and fixes.

58% of organizations still lack a systematic and robust method to actually report on risks (Source: AICPA, 2021)

Data is an invaluable asset – ensure it’s protected

Case Studies

Logo for Cognyte.

Cognyte, a vendor hired to be a cybersecurity analytics company, had over five billion records exposed in Spring 2021. The data was compromised for four days, providing attackers with plenty of opportunities to obtain personally identifying information. (SecureBlink., 2021 & Security Magazine, 2021)

Logo for Facebook.

Facebook, the world’s largest social media giant, had over 533 million Facebook users’ personal data breached when data sets were able to be cross-listed with one another. (Business Insider, 2021 & Security Magazine, 2021)

Logo for MGM Resorts.

In 2020, over 10.6 million customers experienced some sort of data being accessible, with 1,300 having serious personally identifying information breached. (The New York Times, 2020)

Risk management is a business enabler

Formalize risk management to increase your likelihood of success.

By identifying areas of risk exposure and creating solutions proactively, obstacles can be removed or circumvented before they become a real problem.

A certain amount of risk is healthy and can stimulate innovation:

  • A formal risk management strategy doesn’t mean trying to mitigate every possible risk; it means exposing the organization to the right amount of risk.
  • Taking a formal risk management approach allows an organization to thoughtfully choose which risks it is willing to accept.
  • Organizations with high risk management maturity will vault themselves ahead of the competition because they will be aware of which risks to prepare for, which risks to ignore, and which risks to take.

Only 12% of organizations are using risk as a strategic tool most or all of the time (Source: AICPA, 2021)

IT risk is enterprise risk

Accountability for IT risks and the decisions made to address them should be shared between IT and the business.

Multiple types of risk, 'Finance', 'IT', 'People', and 'Digital', funneling into 'ENTERPRISE RISKS'. IT risks have a direct and often aggregated impact on enterprise risks and opportunities in the same way other business risks can. This relationship must be understood and addressed through integrated risk management to ensure a consistent approach to risk.

Follow the steps of this blueprint to build or optimize your IT risk management program

Cycle of 'Goverance' beginning with '1. Identify', '2. Assess', '3. Respond', '4. Monitor', '5. Report'.

Start Here

PHASE 1
Review IT Risk Fundamentals and Governance
PHASE 2
Identify and Assess IT Risk
PHASE 3
Monitor, Report, and Respond to IT Risk

1.1

Review IT Risk Management Fundamentals

1.2

Establish a Risk Governance Framework

2.1

Identify IT Risks

2.2

Assess and Prioritize IT Risks

3.1

Monitor IT Risks and Develop Risk Responses

3.2

Report IT Risk Priorities

Integrate Risk and Use It to Your Advantage

Accelerate and optimize your organization by leveraging meaningful risk data to make intelligent enterprise risk decisions.

Risk management is more than checking an audit box or demonstrating project due diligence.

Risk Drivers
  • Audit & compliance
  • Preserve value & avoid loss
  • Previous risk impact driver
  • Major transformation
  • Strategic opportunities
Arrow pointing right. Only 7% of organizations are in a “leading” or “aspirational” level of risk maturity. (OECD, 2021) 63% of organizations struggle when it comes to defining their appetite toward strategy related risks. (“Global Risk Management Survey,” Deloitte, 2021) Late adopters of risk management were 70% more likely to use instinct over data or facts to inform an efficient process. (Clear Risk, 2020) 55% of organizations have little to no training on ERM to properly implement such practices. (AICPA, NC State Poole College of Management, 2021)
1. Assess Enterprise Risk Maturity 3. Build a Risk Management Program Plan 4. Establish Risk Management Processes 5. Implement a Risk Management Program
2. Determine Authority with Governance
Unfortunately, less than 50% of those in risk focused roles are also in a governance role where they have the authority to provide risk oversight. (Governance Institute of Australia, 2020)
IT can improve the maturity of the organization’s risk governance and help identify risk owners who have authority and accountability.

Governance and related decision making is optimized with integrated and aligned risk data.

List of 'Integrated Risk Maturity Categories': '1. Context & Strategic Direction', '2. Risk Culture and Authority', '3. Risk Management Process', and '4. Risk Program Optimization'. The five types of a risk in 'Enterprise Risk Management (ERM)': 'IT', 'Security', 'Digital', 'Vendor/TPRM', and 'Other'.

ERM incorporates the different types of risk, including IT, security, digital, vendor, and other risk types.

The program plan is meant to consider all the major risk types in a unified approach.

The 'Risk Process' cycle starting with '1. Identify', '2. Assess', '3. Respond', '4. Monitor', '5. Report', and back to the beginning. Implementation of an integrated risk management program requires ongoing access to risk data by those with decision making authority who can take action.

Blueprint deliverables

Each step of this blueprint is accompanied by supporting deliverables to help you accomplish your goals:

Key deliverable:

Risk Management Program Manual

Use the tools and activities in each phase of the blueprint to create a comprehensive, customized program manual for the ongoing management of IT risk.

Sample of the key deliverable, Risk Manangement Program Fund.
Integrated Risk Maturity Assessment

Assess the organization's current maturity and readiness for integrated risk management (IRM).

Sample of the Integrated Risk Maturity Assessment blueprint. Centralized Risk Register

The repository for all the risks that have been identified within your environment.

Sample of the Centralized Risk Register blueprint.
Risk Costing Tool

A potential cost-benefit analysis of possible risk responses to determine a good method to move forward.

Sample of the Risk Costing Tool blueprint. Risk Report & Risk Event Action Plan

A method to report risk severity and hold risk owners accountable for chosen method of responding.

Samples of the Risk Report & Risk Event Action Plan blueprints.

Benefit from industry-leading best practices

As a part of our research process, we used the COSO, ISO 31000, and COBIT 2019 frameworks. Contextualizing IT risk management within these frameworks ensured that our project-focused approach is grounded in industry-leading best practices for managing IT risk.

Logo for COSO.

COSO’s Enterprise Risk Management — Integrating with Strategy and Performance addresses the evolution of enterprise risk management and the need for organizations to improve their approach to managing risk to meet the demands of an evolving business environment. (COSO)

Logo for ISO.

ISO 31000
Risk Management can help organizations increase the likelihood of achieving objectives, improve the identification of opportunities and threats, and effectively allocate and use resources for risk treatment. (ISO 31000)

Logo for COBIT.

COBIT 2019’s IT functions were used to develop and refine our Ten IT Risk Categories used in our top-down risk identification methodology. (COBIT 2019)

Abandon ad hoc risk management

A strong risk management foundation is valuable when building your IT risk management program.

This research covers the following IT risk fundamentals:

  • Benefits of formalized risk management
  • Key terms and definitions
  • Risk management within ERM
  • Risk management independent of ERM
  • Four key principles of IT risk management
  • Importance of a risk management program manual
  • Importance of buy-in and support from the business

Drivers of Formalized Risk Management:

Drivers External to IT
External Audit Internal Audit
Mandated by ERM
Occurrence of Risk Event
Demonstrating IT’s value to the business Proactive initiative
Emerging IT risk awareness
Grassroots Drivers

Blueprint benefits

IT Benefits

  • Increased on-time, in-scope, and on-budget completion of IT projects.
  • Meet the business’ service requirements.
  • Improved satisfaction with IT by senior leadership and business units.
  • Fewer resources wasted on fire-fighting.
  • Improved availability, integrity, and confidentiality of sensitive data.
  • More efficient use of resources.
  • Greater ability to respond to evolving threats.

Business Benefits

  • Reduced operational surprises or failures.
  • Improved IT flexibility when responding to risk events and market fluctuations.
  • Reduced budget uncertainty.
  • Improved ability to make decisions when developing long-term strategies.
  • Improved stakeholder and shareholder confidence.
  • Achieved compliance with external regulations.
  • Competitive advantage over organizations with immature risk management practices.

Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

DIY Toolkit

Guided Implementation

Workshop

Consulting

"Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful." "Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track." "We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place." "Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project."

Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

Guided Implementation

A Guided Implementation (GI) is a series of calls with an Info-Tech analyst to help implement our best practices in your organization.

A typical GI is 6 to 8 calls over the course of 3 to 6 months.

What does a typical GI on this topic look like?

    Phase 1

  • Call #1: Assess current risk maturity and organizational buy-in.
  • Call #2: Establish an IT risk council and determine IT risk management program goals.
  • Phase 2

  • Call #3: Identify the risk categories used to organize risk events.
  • Call #4: Identify the threshold for risk the organization can withstand.
  • Phase 3

  • Call #5: Create a method to assess risk event severity.
  • Call #6: Establish a method to monitor priority risks and consider possible risk responses.
  • Call #7: Communicate risk priorities to the business and implement risk management plan.

Workshop Overview

Contact your account representative for more information.
workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8889

Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5
Activities
Review IT Risk Fundamentals and Governance

1.1 Assess current program maturity

1.2 Complete RACI chart

1.3 Create the IT risk council

1.4 Identify and engage key stakeholders

1.5 Add organization-specific risk scenarios

1.6 Identify risk events

Identify IT Risks

2.1 Identify risk events (continued)

2.2 Augment risk event list using COBIT5 processes

2.3 Determine the threshold for (un)acceptable risk

2.4 Create impact and probability scales

2.5 Select a technique to measure reputational cost

2.6 Conduct risk severity level assessment

Assess IT Risks

3.1 Conduct risk severity level assessment

3.2 Document the proximity of the risk event

3.3 Conduct expected cost assessment

3.4 Develop key risk indicators (KRIs) and escalation protocols

3.5 Perform root cause analysis

3.6 Identify and assess risk responses

Monitor, Report, and Respond to IT Risk

4.1 Identify and assess risk responses

4.2 Risk response cost-benefit analysis

4.3 Create multi-year cost projections

4.4 Review techniques for embedding risk management in IT

4.5 Finalize the Risk Report and Risk Management Program Manual

4.6 Transfer ownership of risk responses to project managers

Next Steps and Wrap-Up (offsite)

5.1 Complete in-progress deliverables from previous four days

5.2 Set up review time for workshop deliverables and to discuss next steps

Outcomes
  1. Maturity Assessment
  2. Risk Management Program Manual
  1. Finalized List of IT Risk Events
  2. Risk Register
  3. Risk Management Program Manual
  1. Risk Register
  2. Risk Event Action Plans
  3. Risk Management Program Manual
  1. Risk Report
  2. Risk Management Program Manual
  1. Workshop Report
  2. Risk Management Program Manual

Build an IT Risk Management Program

Phase 1

Review IT Risk Fundamentals and Governance

Phase 1

  • 1.1 Review IT Risk Management Fundamentals
  • 1.2 Establish a Risk Governance Framework

Phase 2

  • 2.1 Identify IT Risks
  • 2.2 Assess and Prioritize IT Risks

Phase 3

  • 3.1 Develop Risk Responses and Monitor IT Risks
  • 3.2 Report IT Risk Priorities

This phase will walk you through the following activities:

  • Gain buy-in from senior leadership
  • Assess current program maturity
  • Identify obstacles and pain points
  • Determine the risk culture of the organization
  • Develop risk management goals
  • Develop SMART project metrics
  • Create the IT risk council
  • Complete a RACI chart

This phase involves the following participants:

  • IT executive leadership
  • Business executive leadership

Step 1.1

Review IT Risk Management Fundamentals

Activities
  • 1.1.1 Gain buy-in from senior leadership
  • 1.1.2 Assess current program maturity

This step involves the following participants:

  • IT executive leadership
  • Business executive leadership

Outcomes of this step

  • Reviewed key IT principles and terminology
  • Gained understanding of the relationship between IT risk management and ERM
  • Introduced to Info-Tech’s IT Risk Management Framework
  • Obtained the support of senior leadership
Step 1.1 Step 1.2

Effective IT risk management is possible with or without ERM

Whether or not your organization has ERM, integrating your IT risk management program with the business is possible.

Most IT departments find themselves in one of these two organizational frameworks for managing IT risk:

Core Responsibilities With an ERM Without an ERM
  • Risk Decision-Making Authority
  • Final Accountability
Senior Leadership Team Senior Leadership Team
  • Risk Governance
  • Risk Prioritization & Communication
ERM IT Risk Management
  • Risk Identification
  • Risk Assessment
  • Risk Monitoring
IT Risk Management
Pro: IT’s risk management responsibilities are defined (assessment schedules, escalation and reporting procedures).
Con: IT may lack autonomy to implement IT risk management best practices.
Pro: IT is free to create its own IT risk council and develop customized processes that serve its unique needs.
Con: Lack of clear reporting procedures and mechanisms to share accountability with the business.

Info-Tech’s IT risk management framework walks you through each step to achieve risk readiness

IT Risk Management Framework

Risk Governance
  • Optimize Risk Management Processes
  • Assess Risk Maturity
  • Measure the Success of the Program
A cycle surrounds the words 'Business Objectives', referring to the surrounding lists. On the top half is 'Communication', and the bottom is 'Monitoring'. Risk Identification
  • Engage Stakeholder Participation
  • Use Risk Identification Frameworks
  • Compile IT-Related Risks
Risk Response
  • Establish Monitoring Responsibilities
  • Perform Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Report Risk Response Actions
Risk Assessment
  • Establish Thresholds for Unacceptable Risk
  • Calculate Expected Cost
  • Determine Risk Severity & Prioritize IT Risks

Effective IT risk management benefits

Obtain the support of the senior leadership team or IT steering committee by communicating how IT risk impacts their priorities.

Risk management benefits To engage the business...
IT is compliant with external laws and regulations. Identify the industry or legal legislation and regulations your organization abides by.
IT provides support for business compliance. Find relevant business compliance issues, and relate compliance failures to cost.
IT regularly communicates costs, benefits, and risks to the business. Acknowledge the number of times IT and the business miscommunicate critical information.
Information and processing infrastructure are very secure. Point to past security breaches or potential vulnerabilities in your systems.
IT services are usually delivered in line with business requirements. Bring up IT services that the business was unsatisfied with. Explain that their inputs in identifying risks are correlated with project quality.
IT related business risks are managed very well. Make it clear that with no risk tracking process, business processes become exposed and tend to slow down.
IT projects are completed on time and within budget. Point out late or over-budget projects due to the occurrence of unforeseen risks.

1.1.1 Gain buy-in from senior leadership

1-4 hours

Input: List of IT personnel and business stakeholders

Output: Buy-in from senior leadership for an IT risk management program

Materials: Risk Management Program Manual

Participants: IT executive leadership, Business executive leadership

The resource demands of IT risk management will vary from organization to organization. Here are typical requirements:

  • Occasional participation of key IT personnel and select business stakeholders in IT risk council meetings (e.g. once every two weeks).
  • Periodic risk assessments (e.g. 4 days, twice a year).
  • IT personnel must take on risk monitoring responsibilities (e.g. 1-4 hours per week).
  • Record the results in the Program Manual sections 3.3, 3.4 and 3.5.

Record the results in the Risk Management Program Manual.

Integrated Risk Maturity Assessment

The purpose of the Integrated Risk Maturity Assessment is to assess the organization's current maturity and readiness for integrated risk management (IRM)

Frequently and continually assessing your organization’s maturity toward integrated risk ensures the right risk management program can be adopted by your organization.

Integrated Risk Maturity Assessment
A simple tool to understand if your organization is ready to embrace integrated risk management by measuring maturity across four key categories: Context & Strategic Direction, Risk Culture & Authority, Risk Management Process, and Risk Program Optimization.
Sample of the Integrated Risk Maturity Assessment deliverable.

Use the results from this integrated risk maturity assessment to determine the type of risk management program that can and should be adopted by your organizations.

Some organizations will need to remain siloed and focused on IT risk management only, while others will be able to integrate risk-related information to start enabling automatic controls that respond to this data.

1.1.2 Assess current program maturity

1-4 hours

Input: List of IT personnel and business stakeholders

Output: Maturity scores across four key risk categories

Materials: Integrated Risk Maturity Assessment Tool

Participants: IT executive leadership, Business executive leadership

This assessment is intended for frequent use; process completeness should be re-evaluated on a regular basis.

How to Use This Assessment:

  1. Download the Integrated Risk Management Maturity Assessment Tool.
  2. Tab 2, "Data Entry:" This is a qualitative assessment of your integrated risk management process and is organized by the categories of integrated risk maturity. You will be asked to rate the extent to which you are executing the activities required to successfully complete each phase of the assessment. Use the drop-down menus provided to select the appropriate level of execution for each activity listed.
  3. Tab 3, "Results:" This tab will display your rate of IRM completeness/maturity. You will receive a score for each category as well as an overall score. The results will be displayed numerically, by percentage, and graphically.

Record the results in the Integrated Risk Maturity Assessment.

Integrated Risk Maturity Categories

Semi-circle with colored points indicating four categories.

1

Context & Strategic Direction Understanding of the organization’s main objectives and how risk can support or enhance those objectives.

2

Risk Culture and Authority Examine if risk-based decisions are being made by those with the right level of authority and if the organization’s risk appetite is embedded in the culture.

3

Risk Management Process Determine if the current process to identify, assess, respond to, monitor, and report on risks is benefitting the organization.

4

Risk Program Optimization Consider opportunities where risk-related data is being gathered, reported, and used to make informed decisions across the enterprise.

Step 1.2

Establish a Risk Governance Framework

Activities
  • 1.2.1 Identify pain points/obstacles and opportunities
  • 1.2.2 Determine the risk culture of the organization
  • 1.2.3 Develop risk management goals
  • 1.2.4 Develop SMART project metrics
  • 1.2.5 Create the IT risk council
  • 1.2.6 Complete a RACI chart

This step involves the following participants:

  • IT executive leadership
  • Business executive leadership

Outcomes of this step

  • Developed goals for the risk management program
  • Established the IT risk council
  • Assigned accountability and responsibility for risk management processes

Review IT Risk Fundamentals and Governance

Step 1.1 Step 1.2

Create an IT risk governance framework that integrates with the business

Follow these best practices to make sure your requirements are solid:

  1. Self-assess your current approach to IT risk management.
  2. Identify organizational obstacles and set attainable risk management goals.
  3. Track the effectiveness and success of the program using SMART risk management metrics.
  4. Establish an IT risk council tasked with managing IT risk.
  5. Set clear risk management accountabilities and responsibilities for IT and business stakeholders.

Key metrics for your IT risk governance framework

Challenges:
  • Key stakeholders are left out or consulted once risks have already occurred.
  • Failure to employ consistent risk identification methodologies results in omitted and unknown risks.
  • Risk assessments do not reflect organizational priorities and may not align with thresholds for acceptable risk.
  • Risk assessment occurs sporadically or only after a major risk event has already occurred.
Key metrics:
  • Number of risk management processes done ad hoc.
  • Frequency that IT risk appears as an agenda item at IT steering committee meetings.
  • Percentage of IT employees whose performance evaluations reflect risk management objectives.
  • Percentage of IT risk council members who are trained in risk management activities.
  • Number of open positions in the IT risk council.
  • Cost of risk management program operations per year.

Info-Tech Insight

Metrics provide the foundation for determining the success of your IT risk management program and ensure ongoing funding to support appropriate risk responses.

IT risk management success factors

Support and sponsorship from senior leadership

IT risk management has more success when initiated by a member of the senior leadership team or the board, rather than emerging from IT as a grassroots initiative.

Sponsorship increases the likelihood that risk management is prioritized and receives the necessary resources and attention. It also ensures that IT risk accountability is assumed by senior leadership.

Risk culture and awareness

A risk-aware organizational culture embraces new policies and processes that reflect a proactive approach to risk.

An organization with a risk-aware culture is better equipped to facilitate communication vertically within the organization.

Risk awareness can be embedded by revising job descriptions and performance assessments to reflect IT risk management responsibilities.

Organization size

Smaller organizations can often institute a mature risk management program much more quickly than larger organizations.

It is common for key personnel within smaller organizations to be responsible for multiple roles associated with risk management, making it easier to integrate IT and business risk management.

Larger organizations may find it more difficult to integrate a more complex and dispersed network of individuals responsible for various risk management responsibilities.

1.2.1 Identify obstacles and pain points

1-4 hours

Input: Integrated Risk Maturity Assessment

Output: Obstacles and pain points identified

Materials: IT Risk Management Success Factors

Participants: IT executive leadership, Business executive leadership

Anticipate potential challenges and “blind spots” by determining which success factors are missing from your current situation.

Instructions:

  1. List the potential obstacles and missing success factors that you must overcome to effectively manage IT risk and build a risk management program.
  2. Consider some opportunities that could be leveraged to increase the success of this program.
  3. Use this list in Activity 1.2.3 to develop program goals.

Risk Management

Replace the example pain points and opportunities with real scenarios in your organization.

Pain Points/Obstacles
  • Lack of leadership buy-in
  • Skills and understanding around risk management within IT
  • Skills and understanding around risk management within the organization
  • Lack of a defined risk management posture
Opportunities
  • Changes in regulations related to risk
  • Organization moving toward an integrated risk management program
  • Ability to leverage lessons learned from similar companies
  • Strong process management and adherence to policies by employees in the organization

1.2.2 Determine the risk culture of your organization

1-3 hours

Determine how your organization fits the criteria listed below. Descriptions and examples do not have to match your organization perfectly.

Risk Tolerant
  • You have no compliance requirements.
  • You have no sensitive data.
  • Customers do not expect you to have strong security controls.
  • Revenue generation and innovative products take priority and risk is acceptable.
  • The organization does not have remote locations.
  • It is likely that your organization does not operate within the following industries:
    • Finance
    • Health care
    • Telecom
    • Government
    • Research
    • Education
Moderate
  • You have some compliance requirements, e.g.:
    • HIPAA
    • PIPEDA
  • You have sensitive data, and are required to retain records.
  • Customers expect strong security controls.
  • Information security is visible to senior leadership.
  • The organization has some remote locations.
  • Your organization most likely operates within the following industries:
    • Government
    • Research
    • Education
Risk Averse
  • You have multiple, strict compliance and/or regulatory requirements.
  • You house sensitive data, such as medical records.
  • Customers expect your organization to maintain strong and current security controls.
  • Information security is highly visible to senior management and public investors.
  • The organization has multiple remote locations.
  • Your organization operates within the following industries:
    • Finance
    • Healthcare
    • Telecom

Be aware of the organization’s attitude towards risk

Risk culture is an organization’s attitude towards taking risks. This attitude manifests itself in two ways:

One element of risk culture is what levels of risk the organization is willing to accept to pursue its objectives and what levels of risk are deemed unacceptable. This is often called risk appetite.
Risk tolerant

Risk-tolerant organizations embrace the potential of accelerating growth and the attainment of business objectives by taking calculated risks.

Risk averse

Risk-averse organizations prefer consistent, gradual growth and goal attainment by embracing a more cautious stance toward risk.

The other component of risk culture is the degree to which risk factors into decision making.
Risk conscious

Risk-conscious organizations place a high priority on being aware of all risks impacting business objectives, regardless of whether they choose to accept or respond to those risks.

Unaware

Organizations that are largely unaware of the impact of risk generally believe there are few major risks impacting business objectives and choose to invest resources elsewhere.

Info-Tech Insight

Organizations typically fall in the middle of these spectrums. While risk culture will vary depending on the industry and maturity of the organization, a culture with a balanced risk appetite that is extremely risk conscious is able to make creative, dynamic decisions with reasonable limits placed on risk-related decision making.

1.2.3 Develop goals for the IT risk management program

1-4 hours

Input: Integrated Risk Maturity Assessment, Risk Culture, Pain Points and Opportunities

Output: Goals for the IT risk management program

Materials: Risk Management Program Manual

Participants: IT executive leadership, Business executive leadership

Translate your maturity assessment and knowledge about organizational risk culture, potential obstacles, and success factors to develop goals for your IT risk management program.

Instructions:

  1. In the Risk Management Program Manual, revise, replace, or add to the high-level goals provided in section 2.4.
  2. Make sure that you have three to five high-level goals that reflect the current and targeted maturity of IT risk management processes.
  3. Integrate potential obstacles, pain points, and insights from the organization’s risk culture.

Record the results in the Risk Management Program Manual.

1.2.4 Develop SMART project metrics

1-3 hours

Create metrics for measuring the success of the IT risk management program.

Ensure that all success metrics are SMART Instructions
  1. Document a list of appropriate metrics to assess the success of the IT risk management program on a whiteboard.
  2. Use the sample metrics listed in the table on the next slide as a starting point.
  3. Fill in the chart to indicate the:
    1. Name of the success metric
    2. Method for measuring success
    3. Baseline measurement
    4. Target measurement
    5. Actual measurements at various points throughout the process of improving the risk management program
    6. A deadline for each metric to meet the target measurement
Strong Make sure the objective is clear and detailed.
Measurable Objectives are measurable if there are specific metrics assigned to measure success. Metrics should be objective.
Actionable Objectives become actionable when specific initiatives designed to achieve the objective are identified.
Realistic Objectives must be achievable given your current resources or known available resources.
Time-Bound An objective without a timeline can be put off indefinitely. Furthermore, measuring success is challenging without a timeline.

1.2.4 Develop SMART project metrics (continued)

1-3 hours

Attach metrics to your goals to gauge the success of the IT risk management program.

Replace the example metrics with accurate KPIs or metrics for your organization.

Sample Metrics
Name Method Baseline Target Deadline Checkpoint 1 Checkpoint 2 Final
Number of risks identified (per year) Risk register 0 100 Dec. 31
Number of business units represented (risk identification) Meeting minutes 0 5 Dec. 31
Frequency of risk assessment Assessments recorded in risk management program manual 0 2 per year Year 2
Percentage of identified risk events that undergo expected cost assessment Ratio of risks assessed in the risk costing tool to risks assessed in the risk register 0 20% Dec. 31
Number of top risks without an identified risk response Risk register 5 0 March 1
Cost of risk management program operations per year Meeting frequency and duration, multiplied by the cost of participation $2,000 $5,000 Dec. 31

Create the IT risk committee (ITRC)

Responsibilities of the ITRC:
  1. Formalize risk management processes.
  2. Identify and review major risks throughout the IT department.
  3. Recommend an appropriate risk appetite or level of exposure.
  4. Review the assessment of the impact and likelihood of identified risks.
  5. Review the prioritized list of risks.
  6. Create a mitigation plan to minimize risk likelihood and impact.
  7. Review and communicate overall risk impact and risk management success.
  8. Assign risk ownership responsibilities of key risks to ensure key risks are monitored and risk responses are effectively implemented.
  9. Address any concerns in regards to the risk management program, including, but not limited to, reviewing their risk management duties and resourcing.
  10. Communicate risk reports to senior management annually.
  11. Make any alterations to the committee roster and the individuals’ responsibilities as needed and document changes.
Must be on the ITRC:
  • CIO
  • CRO (if applicable)
  • Senior Directors
  • Security Officer
  • Head of Operations

Must be on the ITRC:

  • CFO
  • Senior representation from every business unit impacted by IT risk

1.2.5 Create the IT risk council

1-4 hours

Input: List of IT personnel and business stakeholders

Output: Goals for the IT risk management program

Materials: Risk Management Program Manual

Participants: CIO, CRO (if applicable), Senior Directors, Head of Operations

Identify the essential individuals from both the IT department and the business to create a permanent committee that meets regularly and carries out IT risk management activities.

Instructions:

  1. Review sections 3.1 (Mandate) and 3.2 (Agenda and Responsibilities) of the IT Risk Committee Charter, located in the Risk Management Program Manual. Make any necessary revisions.
  2. In section 3.3, document how frequently the council is scheduled to meet.
  3. In section 3.4, document members of the IT risk council.
  4. Obtain sign-off for the IT risk council from the CIO or another member of the senior leadership team in section 3.5 of the manual.

Record the results in the Risk Management Program Manual.

1.2.6 Complete RACI chart

1-3 hours

A RACI diagram is a useful visualization that identifies redundancies and ensures that every role, project, or task has an accountable party.

RACI is an acronym made up of four participatory roles: Instructions
  1. Use the template provided on the following slide, and add key stakeholders who do not appear and are relevant for your organization.
  2. For each activity, assign each stakeholder a letter.
  3. There must be an accountable party for each activity (every activity must have an “A”).
  4. For activities that do not apply to a particular stakeholder, leave the space blank.
  5. Once the chart is complete, copy/paste it into section 4.1 of the Risk Management Program Manual.
Responsible Stakeholders who undertake the activity.
Accountable Stakeholders who are held responsible for failure or take credit for success.
Consulted Stakeholders whose opinions are sought.
Informed Stakeholders who receive updates.

1.2.6 Complete RACI chart (continued)

1-3 hours

Assign risk management accountabilities and responsibilities to key stakeholders:

Stakeholder Coordination Risk Identification Risk Thresholds Risk Assessment Identify Responses Cost-Benefit Analysis Monitoring Risk Decision Making
ITRC A R I R R R A C
ERM C I C I I I I C
CIO I A A A A A I R
CRO I R C I R
CFO I R C I R
CEO I R C I A
Business Units I C C C
IT I I I I I I R C
PMO C C C
Legend: Responsible Accountable Consulted Informed

Build an IT Risk Management Program

Phase 2

Identify and Assess IT Risk

Phase 1

  • 1.1 Review IT Risk Management Fundamentals
  • 1.2 Establish a Risk Governance Framework

Phase 2

  • 2.1 Identify IT Risks
  • 2.2 Assess and Prioritize IT Risks

Phase 3

  • 3.1 Develop Risk Responses and Monitor IT Risks
  • 3.2 Report IT Risk Priorities

This phase will walk you through the following activities:

  • Add organization-specific risk scenarios
  • Identify risk events
  • Augment risk event list using COBIT 2019 processes
  • Conduct a PESTLE analysis
  • Determine the threshold for (un)acceptable risk
  • Create a financial impact assessment scale
  • Select a technique to measure reputational cost
  • Create a likelihood scale
  • Assess risk severity level
  • Assess expected cost

This phase involves the following participants:

  • IT risk council
  • Relevant business stakeholders
  • Representation from senior management team
  • Business Risk Owners

Step 2.1

Identify IT Risks

Activities
  • 2.1.1 Add organization-specific risk scenarios
  • 2.1.2 Identify risk events
  • 2.1.3 Augment risk event list using COBIT 19 processes
  • 2.1.4 Conduct a PESTLE analysis

This step involves the following participants:

  • IT executive leadership
  • IT Risk Council
  • Business executive leadership
  • Business risk owners

Outcomes of this step

  • Participation of key stakeholders
  • Comprehensive list of IT risk events
Identify and Assess IT Risk
Step 2.1 Step 2.2

Get to know what you don’t know

  1. Engage the right stakeholders in risk identification.
  2. Employ Info-Tech’s top-down approach to risk identification.
  3. Augment your risk event list using alternative frameworks.
Key metrics:
  • Total risks identified
  • New risks identified
  • Frequency of updates to the Risk Register Tool
  • Number of realized risk events not identified in the Risk Register Tool
  • Level of business participation in enterprise IT risk identification
    • Number of business units represented
    • Number of meetings attended in person
    • Number of risk reports received

Info-Tech Insight

What you don’t know CAN hurt you. How do you identify IT-related threats and vulnerabilities that you are not already aware of? Now that you have created a strong risk governance framework that formalizes risk management within IT and connects it to the enterprise, follow the steps outlined in this section to reveal all of IT’s risks.

Engage key stakeholders

Ensure that all key risks are identified by engaging key business stakeholders.

Benefits of obtaining business involvement during the risk identification stage:
  • You will identify risk events you had not considered or you weren’t aware of.
  • You will identify risks more accurately.
  • Risk identification is an opportunity to raise awareness of IT risk management early in the process.

Executive Participation:

  • CIO participation is integral when building a comprehensive register of risk events impacting IT.
  • CIOs and IT directors possess a holistic view of all of IT’s functions.
  • CIOs and IT directors are uniquely placed to identify how IT affects other business units and the attainment of business objectives. If applicable, CRO and CTO participation is also critical.

Prioritizing and Selecting Stakeholders

  1. Reliance on IT services and technologies to achieve business objectives.
  2. Relationship with IT, and willingness to engage in risk management activities.
  3. Unique perspectives, skills, and experiences that IT may not possess.

Info-Tech Insight

While IT personnel are better equipped to identify IT risk than anyone, IT does not always have an accurate view of the business’ exposure to IT risk. Strive to maintain a 3 to 1 ratio of IT to non-IT personnel involved in the process.

Enable IT to target risk holistically

Take a top-down approach to risk identification to guide brainstorming

Info-Tech’s risk categories are consistent with a risk identification method called Risk Prompting.

A risk prompt list is a list that categorizes risks into types or areas. The n10 risk categories encapsulate the services, activities, responsibilities, and functions of most IT departments. Use these categories and the example risk scenarios provided as prompts to guide brainstorming and organize risks.

Risk Category: High-level groupings that describe risk pertaining to major IT functions. See the following slide for all ten of Info-Tech’s IT risk categories. Risk Scenario: An abstract profile representing common risk groups that are more specific than risk categories. Typically, organizations are able to identify two to five scenarios for each category. Risk Event: Specific threats and vulnerabilities that fall under a particular risk scenario. Organizations are able to identify anywhere between 1 and 20 events for each scenario. See the Appendix of the Risk Management Program Manual for a list of risk event examples.

Risk Category

Risk Scenario

Risk Event

Compliance Regulatory compliance Being fined for not complying/being aware of a new regulation.
Externally originated attack Phishing attack on the organization.
Operational Technology evaluation & selection Partnering with a vendor that is not in compliance with a key regulation.
Capacity planning Not having sufficient resources to support a DRP.
Third-Party Risk Vendor management Vendor performance requirements are improperly defined.
Vendor selection Vendors are improperly selected to meet the defined use case.

2.1.1 Add organization-specific risk scenarios

1-3 hours

Review Info-Tech’s ten IT risk categories and add risk scenarios to the examples provided.

IT Reputational
  • Negative PR
  • Consumers writing negative reviews
  • Employees writing negative reviews
IT Financial
  • Stock prices drop
  • Value of the organization is reduced
IT Strategic
  • Organization prioritizes innovation but remains focused on operational
  • Unable to access data to support strategic initiative
Operational
  • Enterprise architecture
  • Technology evaluation and selection
  • Capacity planning
  • Operational errors
Availability
  • Power outage
  • Increased data workload
  • Single source of truth
  • Lacking knowledge transfer processes for critical tasks
Performance
  • Network failure
  • Service levels not being met
  • Capacity overload
Compliance
  • Regulatory compliance
  • Standards compliance
  • Audit compliance
Security
  • Malware
  • Internally originated attack
Third Party
  • Vendor selection
  • Vendor management
  • Contract termination
Digital
  • No back-up process if automation fails

2.1.2 Identify risk events

1-4 hours

Input: IT risk categories

Output: Risk events identified and categorized

Materials: Risk Register Tool

Participants: IT risk council, Relevant business stakeholders, Representation from senior management team, Business risk owners, CRO (if applicable)

Use Info-Tech’s IT risk categories and scenarios to brainstorm a comprehensive list of IT-related threats and vulnerabilities impacting your organization.

Instructions:

  1. Document risk events in the Risk Register Tool.
  2. List risk scenarios (organized by risk category) in the Risk Events/Threats column.
  3. Disseminate the list to key stakeholders who were unable to participate and solicit their feedback.
    • Consult the RACI chart located in section 4.1 of the Risk Management Program Manual.
  4. Attack one scenario at a time, exhausting all realistic risk events for that grouping before moving onto the next scenario. Each scenario should take approximately 45-60 minutes.

Tip: If disagreement arises regarding whether a specific risk event is relevant to the organization or not and it cannot be resolved quickly, include it in the list. The applicability of these risks will become apparent during the assessment process.

Record the results in the Risk Register Tool.

2.1.3 Augment the risk event list using COBIT 2019 processes (Optional)

1-3 hours

Other industry-leading frameworks provide alternative ways of conceptualizing the functions and responsibilities of IT and may help you uncover additional risk events.

  1. Managed IT Management Framework
  2. Managed Strategy
  3. Managed Enterprise Architecture
  4. Managed Innovation
  5. Managed Portfolio
  6. Managed Budget and Costs
  7. Managed Human Resources
  8. Managed Relationships
  9. Managed Service Agreements
  10. Managed Vendors
  11. Managed Quality
  12. Managed Risk
  13. Managed Security
  14. Managed Data
  15. Managed Programs
  16. Managed Requirements Definition
  17. Managed Solutions Identification and Build
  18. Managed Availability and Capacity
  19. Managed Organizational Change Enablement
  20. Managed IT Changes
  1. Managed IT Change Acceptance and Transitioning
  2. Managed Knowledge
  3. Managed Assets
  4. Managed Configuration
  5. Managed Projects
  6. Managed Operations
  7. Managed Service Requests and Incidents
  8. Managed Problems
  9. Managed Continuity
  10. Managed Security Services
  11. Managed Business Process Controls
  12. Managed Performance and Conformance Monitoring
  13. Managed System of Internal Control
  14. Managed Compliance with External Requirements
  15. Managed Assurance
  16. Ensured Governance Framework Setting and Maintenance
  17. Ensured Benefits Delivery
  18. Ensured Risk Optimization
  19. Ensured Resource Optimization
  20. Ensured Stakeholder Engagement

Instructions:

  1. Review COBIT 2019’s 40 IT processes and identify additional risk events.
  2. Match risk events to the corresponding risk category and scenario and add them to the Risk Register Tool.

2.1.4 Finalize your risk register by conducting a PESTLE analysis (Optional)

1-3 hours

Explore alternative identification techniques to incorporate external factors and avoid “groupthink.”

Consider the External Environment – PESTLE Analysis

Despite efforts to encourage equal participation in the risk identification process, key risks may not have been shared in previous exercises.

Conduct a PESTLE analysis as a final safety net to ensure that all key risk events have been identified.

Avoid “Groupthink” – Nominal Group Technique

The Nominal Group Technique uses the silent generation of ideas and an enforced “safe” period of time where ideas are shared but not discussed to encourage judgement-free idea generation.

  • Ideas are generated silently and independently.
  • Ideas are then shared and documented; however, discussion is delayed until all of the group’s ideas have been recorded.
  • Idea generation can occur before the meeting and be kept anonymous.

Note: Employing either of these techniques will lengthen an already time-consuming process. Only consider these techniques if you have concerns regarding the homogeneity of the ideas being generated or if select individuals are dominating the exercise.

List the following factors influencing the risk event:
  • Political factors
  • Economic factors
  • Social factors
  • Technological factors
  • Legal factors
  • Environmental factors
'PESTLE Analysis' presented as a wheel with the acronym's meanings surrounding the title. 'Political Factors', 'Economic Factors', 'Social Factors', 'Technological Factors', 'Legal Factors', and 'Environmental Factors'.

Step 2.2

Assess and Prioritize IT Risks

Activities
  • 2.2.1 Determine the threshold for (un)acceptable risk
  • 2.2.2 Create a financial impact assessment scale
  • 2.2.3 Select a technique to measure reputational cost
  • 2.2.4 Create a likelihood scale
  • 2.2.5 Risk severity level assessment
  • 2.2.6 Expected cost assessment

This step involves the following participants:

  • IT risk council
  • Relevant business stakeholders
  • Representation from senior management team
  • Business risk owners

Outcomes of this step

  • Business-approved thresholds for unacceptable risk
  • Completed Risk Register Tool with risks prioritized according to severity
  • Expected cost calculations for high-priority risks

Identify and Assess IT Risk

Step 2.1 Step 2.2

Reveal the organization’s greatest IT threats and vulnerabilities

  1. Establish business-approved risk thresholds for acceptable and unacceptable risk.
  2. Conduct a streamlined assessment of all risks to separate acceptable and unacceptable risks.
  3. Perform a deeper, cost-based assessment of prioritized risks.
Key metrics:
  • Frequency of IT risk assessments
    • (Annually, bi-annually, etc.)
  • Assessment accuracy
    • Percentage of risk assessments that are substantiated by later occurrences or testing
    • Ratio of cumulative actual costs to expected costs
  • Assessment consistency
    • Percentage of risk assessments that are substantiated by third-party audit
  • Assessment rigor
    • Percentage of identified risk events that undergo first-level assessment (severity scores)
    • Percentage of identified risk events that undergo second-level assessment (expected cost)
  • Stakeholder oversight and participation
    • Level of executive participation in IT risk assessment (attend in person, receive report, etc.)
    • Number of business stakeholder reviews per risk assessment

Info-Tech Insight

Risk is money. It’s impossible to make intelligent decisions about risks without knowing what their financial impact will be.

Review risk assessment fundamentals

Risk assessment provides you with the raw materials to conduct an informed cost-benefit analysis and make robust risk response decisions.

In this section, you will be prioritizing your IT risks according to their risk severity, which is a reflection of their expected cost.

Calculating risk severity

How much you expect a risk event to cost if it were to occur:

Likelihood of Risk Impact

e.g. $250,000 or “High”

X

Calibrated by how likely the risk is to occur:

Likelihood of Risk Occurrence

e.g. 10% or “Low”

=

Produces a dollar value or “severity level” for comparing risks:

Risk Severity

e.g. $25,000 or “Medium”
Which must be evaluated against thresholds for acceptable risk and the cost of risk responses.

Risk Tolerance
Risk Response

CBA
Cost-benefit analysis

Maintain the engagement of key stakeholders in the risk assessment process

1

Engage the Business During Assessment Process

Asking business stakeholders to make significant contributions to the assessment exercise may be unrealistic (particularly for members of the senior leadership team, other than the CIO).

Ensure that they work with you to finalize thresholds for acceptable or unacceptable risk.

2

Verify the Risk Impact and Assessment

If IT has ranked risk events appropriately, the business will be more likely to offer their input. Share impact and likelihood values for key risks to see if they agree with the calculated risk severity scores.

3

Identify Where the Business Focuses Attention

While verifying, pay attention to the risk events that the business stresses as key risks. Keep these risks in mind when prioritizing risk responses as they are more likely to receive funding.

Try to communicate the assessments of these risk events in terms of expected cost to attract the attention of business leaders.

Info-Tech Insight

If business executives still won’t provide the necessary information to update your initial risk assessments, IT should approach business unit leaders and lower-level management. Lean on strong relationships forged over time between IT and business managers or supervisors to obtain any additional information.

Info-Tech recommends a two-level approach to risk assessment

Review the two levels of risk assessment offered in this blueprint.

Risk severity level assessment (mandatory)

1

Information

Number of risks: Assess all risk events identified in Phase 1.
Units of measurement: Use customized likelihood and impact “levels.”
Time required: One to five minutes per risk event.

Assess Likelihood

Negligible
Low
Moderate
High
Very High

X

Assess Likelihood

Negligible
Low
Moderate
High
Very High

=

Output


Risk Security Level:

Moderate

Example of a risk severity level assessment chart.
Chart risk events according to risk severity as this allows you to organize and prioritize IT risks.

Assess all of your identified risk events with a risk severity-level assessment.

  • By creating a likelihood and impact assessment scale divided into three to nine “levels” (sometimes referred to as “buckets”), you can evaluate every risk event quickly while being confident that risks are being assessed accurately.
  • In the following activities, you will create likelihood and impact scales that align with your organizational risk appetite and tolerance.
  • Severity-level assessment is a “first pass” of your risk list, revealing your organization’s most severe IT risks, which can be assessed in greater detail by incorporating expected cost into your evaluation.

Info-Tech recommends a two-level approach to risk assessment (continued)

Expected cost assessment (optional)

2

Information

Number of risks: Only assess high-priority risks revealed by severity-level assessment.
Units of measurement: Use actual likelihood values (%) and impact costs ($).
Time required: 10-20 minutes per risk event.

Assess Likelihood

15%

Moderate

X

Assess Likelihood

$100,000

High

=

Output


Expected Cost:

$15,000

Expected cost is useful for conducting cost-benefit analysis and comparing IT risks to non-IT risks and other budget priorities for the business.

Conduct expected cost assessments for IT’s greatest risks.

For risk events warranting further analysis, translate risk severity levels into hard expected-cost numbers.

Why conduct expected cost assessments?
  • Expected cost represents how much you would expect to pay in an average year for each risk event.
  • Communicate risk priorities to the business in language they can understand.
  • While risk severity levels are useful for comparing one IT risk to another, expected cost data allows the business to compare IT risks to non-IT risks that may not use the same scales.
Why is expected cost assessment optional?
  • Determining robust likelihood values and precise impact estimates can be challenging and time consuming.
  • Some risk events may require extensive data gathering and industry analysis.

Implement and leverage a centralized risk register

The purpose of the risk register is to act as the repository for all the risks that have been identified within your environment.

Use this tool to:

  1. Collect and maintain a repository for all IT risk events impacting the organization and relevant information for each risk.
    • Capture all relevant IT risk information in one location.
    • Organize risk identification and assessment information for transparent risk management, stakeholder review, and/or internal audit.
  2. Calculate risk severity scores to prioritize risk events and determine which risks require a risk response.
    • Separate acceptable and unacceptable risks (as determined by the business).
    • Rank risks based on severity levels.
  3. Assess risk responses and calculate residual risk.
    • Evaluate the effect that proposed risk response actions will have on top risk events and quantify residual risk magnitude.
    • This step will be completed in section 3.1

2.2.1 Determine the threshold for (un)acceptable risk

1-4 hours

Input: Risk events, Risk appetite

Output: Threshold for risk identified

Materials: Risk Register Tool, Risk Management Program Manual

Participants: IT risk council, Relevant business stakeholders, Representation from senior management team, Business risk owner

Instructions:

There are times when the business needs to know about IT risks with high expected costs.

  1. Create an expected cost threshold that defines what constitutes an acceptable and unacceptable risk for the organization. This figure should be a concrete dollar value. In the next exercises, you will build risk impact and likelihood scales with this value in mind, ensuring that “high” or “extreme” risks are immediately communicated to senior leadership.
  2. Do not consider IT budget restrictions when developing this number. The acceptable risk threshold should reflect the business’ tolerance/appetite for risk.

This threshold is typically based on the organization’s ability to absorb financial losses, and its tolerance/appetite towards risk.

If your organization has ERM, adopt the existing acceptability threshold.

Record this threshold in section 5.3 of the Risk Management Program Manual

2.2.2 Create a financial impact assessment scale

1-4 hours

Input: Risk events, Risk threshold

Output: Financial impact scale created

Materials: Risk Register Tool, Risk Management Program Manual

Participants: IT risk council, Relevant business stakeholders, Representation from senior management team, Business risk owner

Instructions:

  1. Create a scale to assess the financial impact of risk events.
    • Typically, risk impacts are assessed on a scale of 1-5; however, some organizations may prefer to assess risks using 3, 4, 7, or 9-point scales.
  2. Ensure that the unacceptable risk threshold is reflected in the scale.
    • In the example provided, the unacceptable risk threshold ($100,000) is represented as “High” on the impact scale.
  3. Attach labels to each point on the scale. Effective labels will easily distinguish between risks on either side of the unacceptable risk threshold.

Record the risk impact scale in section 5.3 of the Risk Management Program Manual

Convert project overruns and service outages into costs

Use the tables below to quickly convert impacts typically measured in units of time to financial cost. Replace the values in the table with those that reflect your own costs.

  • While project overruns and service outages may have intangible impacts beyond the unexpected costs stemming from paying employees and lost revenue (such as adding complexity to project management and undermining the business’ confidence in IT), these measurements will provide adequate impact estimations for risk assessment.
  • Remember, complex risk events can be analyzed further with an expected cost assessment.
Project Overruns Scale for the use of cost assessment with dollar amounts associated with impact levels. '$250,000 - Extreme', '$100,000 - High', '$60,000 - Moderate', '$35,000 - Low', '$10,000 - Negligible'.

Project

Time (days)

20 days

Number of employees

8

Average cost per employee (per day)

$300

Estimated cost

$48,000
Service Outages

Service

Time (hours)

4 hours

Lost revenue (per hour)

$10,000

Estimated cost

$40,000

Impact scale

Low

2.2.3 Select a technique to measure reputational cost (1 of 3)

1-3 hours

Realized risk events may have profound reputational costs that do not immediately impact your bottom line.

Reputational cost can take several forms, including the internal and external perception of:
  1. Brand likeability
  2. Product quality
  3. Leadership capability
  4. Social responsibility

Based on your industry and the nature of the risk, select one of the three techniques described in this section to incorporate reputational costs into your risk assessment.

Technique #1 – Use financial indicators:

For-profit companies typically experience reputational loss as a gradual decline in the strength of their brand, exclusion from industry groups, or lost revenue.

If possible, use these measures to put a price on reputational loss:

  • Lost revenue attributable to reputation loss
  • Loss of market share attributable to reputation loss
  • Drops in share price attributable to reputation loss (for public companies)

Match this dollar value to the corresponding level on the impact scale created in Activity 2.2.2.

  • If you are not able to effectively translate all reputational costs into financial costs, proceed to techniques 2 and 3 on the following slides.

2.2.3 Select a technique to measure reputational cost (2 of 3)

1-3 hours
It is common for public sector or not-for-profit organizations to have difficulty putting a price tag on intangible reputational costs.
  • For example, a government organization may be unable to directly quantify the cost of losing the confidence and/or support of the public.
  • A helpful technique is to reframe how reputation is assigned value.
Technique #2 – Calculate the value of avoiding reputational cost:
  1. Imagine that the particular risk event you are assessing has occurred. Describe the resulting reputational cost using qualitative language.

For example:

A data breach, which caused the unsanctioned disclosure of 2,000 client files, has inflicted high reputational costs on the organization. These have impacted the organization in the following ways:

  • Loss of organizational trust in IT
  • IT’s reputation as a value provider to the organization is tarnished
  • Loss of client trust in the organization
  • Potential for a public reprimand of the organization by the government to restore public trust
  • Then, determine (hypothetically) how much money the organization would be willing to spend to prevent the reputational cost from being incurred.
  • Match this dollar value to the corresponding level on the impact scale created in Activity 2.2.2.
  • 2.2.3 Select a technique to measure reputational cost (3 of 3)

    1-3 hours

    If you feel that the other techniques have not reflected reputational impacts in the overall severity level of the risk, create a parallel scale that roughly matches your financial impact scale.

    Technique #3 – Create a parallel scale for reputational impact:

    Visibility is a useful metric for measuring reputational impact. Visibility measures how widely knowledge of the risk event has spread and how negatively the organization is perceived. Visibility has two main dimensions:

    • Internal vs. External
    • Low Amplification vs. High Amplification
    • Internal/External: The further outside of the organization that the risk event is visible, the higher the reputational impact.
      Low/High Amplification: The greater the ability of the actor to communicate and amplify the occurrence of a risk event, the higher the reputational impact.
      After establishing a scale for reputational impact, test whether it reflects the severity of the financial impact levels in the financial impact scale.

    • For example, if the media learns about a recent data breach, does that feel like a $100,000 loss?
    Example:
    Scale for the use of cost assessment  of reputational impact with dimension combinations associated with impact levels. 'External, High Amp, (regulators, lawsuits) - Extreme', 'Internal, High Amp, (CEO) - Low', 'Internal, Low Amp (IT) - Negligible'.

    2.2.4 Create a likelihood scale

    1-3 hours

    Instructions:
    1. Create a scale to assess the likelihood that a risk event will occur over a given period of time.
      • Info-Tech recommends assessing the likelihood that the risk event will occur over a period of one year (the IT risk council should be reassessing the risk event no less than once per year).
    2. Ensure that the likelihood scale contains the same number of levels as the financial impact scale (3, 4, 5, 7, or 9).
    3. The example provided is likely to satisfy most IT departments; however, you may customize the distribution of likelihood values to reflect the organization’s aversion towards uncertainty.
      • For example, an extremely risk-averse organization may consider any risk event with a likelihood greater than 20% to have a “High” likelihood of occurrence.
    4. Attach the same labels used for the financial impact scale (Low, Moderate, High, etc.)

    Record the risk impact scale in section 5.3 of the Risk Management Program Manual

    Scale to assess the likelihood that a risk event will occur. '80-99% - Extreme', '60-79% - High', '40-59% - Moderate' '20-39% - Low', '1-19% - Negligible'.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Note: Info-Tech endorses the use of likelihood values (1-99%) rather than frequency (3 times per year) as a measurement.
    For an explanation of why likelihood values lead to more precise and robust risk assessment, see the Appendix.

    2.2.5 Risk severity level assessment

    6-10 hours

    Input: Risk events identified

    Output: Assessed the likelihood of occurrence and impact for all identified risk events

    Materials: Risk Register Tool

    Participants: IT risk council, Relevant business stakeholders, Representation from senior management team, Business risk owner

    Instructions:

    1. Document the “Risk Category” and “Existing Controls.” in the Risk Register Tool.
      • (See the slide following this activity for tips on identifying existing controls.)
    2. Assign each risk event a likelihood and impact level.
      • Remember, you are assessing the impact that a risk event will have on the organization as a whole, not just on IT.
    3. When assigning a financial impact level to a risk event, factor in the likely number of instances that the event will occur within the time frame for which you are assessing (usually one year).
      • For risk events like third-party service outages that typically occur a few times each year, assign them an impact level that reflects the likelihood of financial impact the risk event will have over the entire year.
      • E.g. If your organization is likely to experience two major service outages next year and each outage costs the organization approximately $15,000, the total financial impact is $30,000.

    Record results in the Risk Register Tool

    2.2.5 Risk severity level assessment (continued)

    Instructions (continued):
    1. Assign a risk owner to non-negligible risk events.
      • For organizations that practice ongoing risk management and frequently reassess their risk portfolio (minimum once per year), risk ownership does not need to be assigned to “Negligible” or low-level risks.
      • View the following slides for advice on how to select a risk owner and information on their responsibilities.
    2. As you input the first few likelihood and impact values, compare them to one another to ensure consistency and accuracy:
      • Is a service outage really twice as impactful as our primary software provider going out of business?
      • Is a data breach far more likely than a ›1 hour web-services outage?
    Tips for Selecting Likelihood Values:

    Does ~10% sound right?

    Test a likelihood estimate by assessing the truth of the following statements:

    • The risk event will likely occur once in the next ten years (if the environment remains nearly identical).
    • If ten organizations existed that were nearly identical to our own, it is likely that one out of ten would experience the risk event this year.

    Screenshot of a risk severity level assessment.

    Identify current risk controls

    Consider how IT is already addressing key risks.

    Types of current risk control

    Tactical controls

    Apply to individual risks only.

    Example: A tactical control for backup/replication failure is faster WAN lines.

    Tactical risk control Strategic controls

    Apply to multiple risks.

    Example: A strategic control for backup/replication failure is implementing formal DR plans.

    Strategic risk control
    Risk event Risk event Risk event

    Screenshot of the column headings on the risk severity level assessment with 'Current Controls' highlighted.
    Consider both tactical and strategic controls already in place when filling out risk event information in the Risk Register Tool.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Identifying existing risk controls (past risk responses) provides a clear picture of the measures already in place to avoid, mitigate, or transfer key risks. This reveals opportunities to improve existing risk controls, or where new strategies are needed, to reduce risk severity levels below business thresholds.

    Assign a risk owner for each risk event

    Designate a member of the IT risk council to be responsible for each risk event.

    Selecting the Appropriate Risk Owner

    Use the following considerations to determine the best owner for each risk:

    • The risk owner should be familiar with the process, project, or IT function related to the risk event.
    • The risk owner should have access to the necessary data to monitor and measure the severity of the risk event.
    • The risk owner’s performance assessment should reflect their ability to demonstrate the ongoing management of their assigned risk events.

    Screenshot of the column headings on the risk severity level assessment with 'Risk Owner' highlighted.

    Risk Owner Responsibilities

    Risk ownership means that an individual is responsible for the following activities:

    • Monitoring the threat or vulnerability for changes in the likelihood of occurrence and/or likely impact.
    • Monitoring changes in the market and external environment that may alter the severity of the risk event.
    • Monitoring changes of closely related risks with interdependencies.
    • Developing and using key risk indicators (KRIs) to measure changes in risk severity.
    • Regularly reporting changes in risk severity to the IT risk council.
    • If necessary, escalating the risk event to other IT risk council personnel or senior management for reassessment.
    • Monitoring risk severity levels for risk events after a risk response has been implemented.

    Use Info-Tech’s Risk Costing Tool to calculate the expected cost of IT’s high-priority risks (optional)

    Sample of the Risk Costing Tool.

    Use this tool to:

    1. Conduct a deeper analysis of severe risks.
      • Determine specific likelihood and financial impact values to communicate the severity of the risk in the Expected Cost tab.
      • Identify the maximum financial impact that the risk event may inflict.
    2. Assess the effectiveness of multiple risk responses for each risk event.
      • Determine how proposed risk events will change the likelihood of occurrence and financial impact of the risk event.
    3. Incorporate risk proximity into your cost-benefit analysis of risk responses.
      • Illustrate how spending decisions will impact the expected cost of the risk event over time.

    2.2.6 Expected cost assessment (optional)

    Assign likelihood and financial impact values to high-priority risks.

    Select risks with these characteristics:

    Strongly consider conducting an expected cost assessment for risk events that meet one or more of the following criteria.

    The risk:

    • Has been assigned to the highest risk severity level.
    • Has exposed the organization previously and had severe implications.
    • Exceeds the organization’s threshold for financial impact.
    • Involves an IT function that is highly visible to the business.
    • Will likely require risk response actions that will exceed current IT budgetary constraints.
    • Is conducive to expected cost assessment:
      • There is general consensus on likelihood estimates.
      • There is general consensus on financial impact estimates.
      • Historical data exists to support estimates.
    Determine which risks require a deeper assessment:

    Info-Tech recommends conducting a second-level assessment for 5-15% of your IT risk register.

    Communicating the expected cost of high-priority risks significantly increases awareness of IT risks by the business.

    Communicating risks to the business using their language also increases the likelihood that risk responses will receive the necessary support and investment


    Record the list of risk events requiring second-level assessment in the Risk Costing Tool.

    • Transfer the likelihood and impact levels for each event into the Risk Costing Tool using data from the Risk Register Tool.

    2.2.6 Expected cost assessment (continued)

    Assign likelihood and financial impact values to high-priority risks.

    Instructions:
    1. Go through the list of prioritized risks in the Risk Costing Tool one by one. Indicate the likelihood and impact level (from the Risk Register Tool) for the risk event being assessed.
    2. Record likelihood values (1-99%) and impact values ($) from participants.
      • Only record values from individuals that indicate they are fairly confident with their estimates.
      • Keep likelihood estimates to values that are multiples of five.
    3. Estimate and record the maximum impact that the risk event could inflict.
      • See Appendix III for information on how the possibility of high-impact scenarios may influence your decision making.
    4. Discuss the estimates provided. Eliminate outliers and retracted estimates.
      • If you are unable to achieve consensus, take the average of the values provided.
    5. If you are having difficulty arriving at a likelihood or impact value, select the median value of the level assigned to the risk during the risk severity level assessment.
      • E.g. Risk event assigned to likelihood level “Moderate” (20-39%). Select a likelihood value of 30%.

    Screenshot of the column headings on the risk severity level assessment with 'Optional Inherent Likelihood Parameters' and 'Optional Inherent Impact Parameters' highlighted.

    Who should participate?
    • Depending on the size of your IT risk council, you may want to consider conducting this exercise in a smaller group.
    • Ideally, you should try to find the right balance between ensuring that the necessary experience and knowledge is in the room while insulating the exercise from outlier opinions, noise, and distractions.

    Evaluate likelihood and impact

    Refine your risk assessment process by developing more accurate measurements of likelihood and impact.

    Intersubjective likelihood

    The goal of the expected cost assessment is to develop robust intersubjective estimates of likelihood and financial impact.

    By aggregating a number of expert opinions of what they deem to be the “correct” value, you will arrive at a collectively determined value that better reflects reality than an individual opinion.

    Example: The Delphi Method

    The Delphi Method is a common technique to produce a judgement that is representative of the collective opinion of a group.

    • Participants are sent a series of sequential questionnaires (typically by email).
    • The first questionnaire asks them what the likelihood, likely impact, and expected cost is for a specific risk event.
    • Data from the questionnaire is compiled and then communicated in a subsequent questionnaire, which encourages participants to restate or revise their estimates given the group’s judgements.
    • With each successive questionnaire, responses will typically converge around a single intersubjective value.
    Justifying Your Estimates:

    When asked to explain the numbers you arrived at during the risk assessment, pointing to an assessment methodology gives greater credibility to your estimates.

    • Assign one individual to take notes during the assessment exercise.
    • Have them document the main rationale behind each value and the level of consensus.

    Info-Tech Insight

    The underlying assumption behind intersubjective forecasting is that group judgements are more accurate than individual judgements. However, this may not be the case at all.

    Sometimes, a single expert opinion is more valuable than many uninformed opinions. Defining whose opinion is valuable and whose is not is an unpleasant exercise; therefore, selecting the right personnel to participate in the exercise is crucially important.

    Build an IT Risk Management Program

    Phase 3

    Monitor, Respond, and Report on IT Risk

    Phase 1

    • 1.1 Review IT Risk Management Fundamentals
    • 1.2 Establish a Risk Governance Framework

    Phase 2

    • 2.1 Identify IT Risks
    • 2.2 Assess and Prioritize IT Risks

    Phase 3

    • 3.1 Develop Risk Responses and Monitor IT Risks
    • 3.2 Report IT Risk Priorities

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Develop key risk indicators (KRIs) and escalation protocols
    • Establish the reporting schedule
    • Identify and assess risk responses
    • Analyze risk response cost-benefit
    • Create multi-year cost projections
    • Obtain executive approval for risk action plans
    • Socialize the Risk Report
    • Transfer ownership of risk responses to project managers
    • Finalize the Risk Management Program Manual

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • IT risk council
    • Relevant business stakeholders
    • Representation from senior management team
    • Risk business owner

    Step 3.1

    Monitor IT Risks and Develop Risk Responses

    Activities
    • 3.1.1 Develop key risk indicators (KRIs) and escalation protocols
    • 3.1.2 Establish the reporting schedule
    • 3.1.3 Identify and assess risk responses
    • 3.1.4 Risk response cost-benefit analysis
    • 3.1.5 Create multi-year cost projections

    This step involves the following participants:

    • IT risk council
    • Relevant business stakeholders
    • Representation from senior management team
    • Business risk owner

    Outcomes of this step

    • Completed risk event action plans
    • Risk responses identified and assessed for top risks
    • Risk response selected for top risks

    Monitor, Respond, and Report on IT Risk

    Step 3.1 Step 3.2

    Use Info-Tech’s Risk Event Action Plan to manage high-priority risks

    Manage risks in between risk assessments and create a paper trail for key risks that exceed the unacceptable risk threshold. Use a new form for every high-priority risk that requires tracking.

    Risk Event Action Plan Sample of the Risk Event Action Plan deliverable.

    Obtaining sign-off from the senior leadership team or from the ERM office is an important step of the risk management process. The Risk Event Action Plan ensures that high-priority risks are closely monitored and that changes in risk severity are detected and reported.

    Clear documentation is a way to ensure that critical information is shared with management so that they can make informed risk decisions. These reports should be succinct yet comprehensive; depending on time and resources, it is good practice to fill out this form and obtain sign-off for the majority of IT risks.

    3.1.1 Develop key risk indicators (KRIs) and escalation protocols

    The risk owner should be held accountable for monitoring their assigned risks but may delegate responsibility for these tasks.

    Instructions:
    1. Design key risk indicators (KRIs) for risks that measure changes in their severity and document them in the Risk Event Action Plan.
      • See the following slide for examples.
    2. Clearly document the risk owner and the individual(s) carrying out risk monitoring activities (delegates) in the Risk Event Action Plan.

    Note: Examples of KRIs can be found on the following slide.

    What are KRIs?
    • KRIs should be observable metrics that alert the IT risk council and management when risk severity exceeds acceptable risk thresholds.
    • KRIs should serve as tripwires or early-warning indicators that trigger further actions to be taken on the risk.
    • Further actions may include:
      • Escalation to the risk owner (if delegated) or to a member of the senior leadership team.
      • Reporting to the IT risk council or IT steering committee.
      • Reassessment.
      • Updating the risk monitoring schedule.

    Document KRIs, escalation thresholds, and escalation protocols for each risk in a Risk Event Action Plan.

    Developing KRIs for success

    Visualization of KRI development, from the 'Risk Event' to the 'Intermediate Steps' with 'KRI Measurements' to the image of a growing seed.

    Examples of KRIs

    • Number of resources who quit or were fired who had access to critical data
    • Number of risk mitigation initiatives unfunded
    • Changes in time horizon of mitigation implementation
    • Number of employees who did not report phishing attempts
    • Amount of time required to get critical operations access to necessary data
    • Number of days it takes to implement a new regulation or compliance control

    3.1.2 Establish the reporting schedule

    For each risk event, document how frequently the risk owner must report to the IT risk council in the Risk Event Action Plan.

    • A clear reporting schedule enforces accountability for each risk event, ensuring that risk owners are fulfilling their monitoring responsibilities.
    • The ongoing discussion of risks between assessment cycles also increases overall awareness of how IT risks are not static but constantly evolving.
    Reporting Risk Event
    Weekly reports to ITRC Risk event severity represented as a thermometer with levels 'Extreme', 'High', 'Moderate', 'Low', and 'Negligible'.
    Bi-weekly reports to ITRC
    Monthly reports to ITRC
    Report to ITRC only if KRI thresholds triggered
    No reports; reassessed bi-annually

    Use Info-Tech’s tools to identify, analyze, and select risk responses

    1

    (Mandatory)
    Tool

    Screenshot of the Risk Register Tool.

    Risk Register Tool

    Information
    • Develop risk responses for all risk events pre-populated on the “2. Risk Register” sheet of the Risk Register Tool.
    • Document the root cause of the risk (Activity 3.1.3) and other contributing factors (Activity 3.1.4).
    • Identify risk responses (Activity 3.1.5).
    • Predict the effectiveness of the risk response, if implemented, by estimating the residual likelihood and impact of the risk (Activity 3.1.5).
    • The tool will calculate the residual severity of the risk after applying the risk response.

    2

    (Optional)
    Tool

    Screenshot of the Risk Costing Tool.

    Risk Costing Tool

    Information
    • Continue your second-level risk analysis for top risks for which you calculated expected cost in section 2.2.
    • Activity 3.1.5:
      • Identify between one and four risk response options for each risk.
      • Develop precise values for residual likelihood and impact.
      • Compare expected cost of the risk event to expected residual cost.
      • Select the risk response to recommend to senior leadership and document it in the Risk Register Tool.

    Determine the root cause of IT risks

    Root cause analysis

    Use the “Five Whys” methodology to identify the root cause and contributing/exacerbating factors for each risk event.

    Diagnosing the root cause of a risk as well as the environmental factors that increase its potential impact and likelihood of occurring allow you to identify more effective risk responses.

    Risk responses that only address the symptoms of the risk are less likely to succeed than responses that address the core issue.

    Concentric circles with 'Root Cause' at the center, 'Contributing Factors' around it, and 'Symptoms' on the outer circle.

    Example of 'The Five Whys Methodology', tracing symptoms to their root cause. In 'Symptoms' we see 'Risk Event: Network outage', Why? 'Network congestion', Why? Then on to 'Contributing Factors' the answer is 'Inadequate bandwidth for latency-sensitive applications', Why? 'Increased business use of latency-sensitive applications', Why? And finally to the 'Root Cause', 'Business units rely on 'real-time' data gathered from latency-sensitive applications', Why?

    Identify factors that contribute to the severity of the risk

    Environmental factors interact with the root cause to increase the likelihood or impact of the risk event.

    What factors matter?

    Identify relevant actors and assets that amplify or diminish the severity of the risk.

    Actors

    • Internal (business units)
    • External (vendor, regulator, market, competitor, hostile actor)

    Assets/Resources

    • Infrastructure
    • Applications
    • Processes
    • Information/data
    • Personnel
    • Reputation
    • Operations
    Develop risk responses that target contributing factors.
    Root cause:
    Business units rely on “real-time” data gathered from latency-sensitive applications

    Actors: Enterprise App users (Finance, Product Development, Product Management)

    Asset/resource: Applications, network

    Risk response:
    Decrease the use of latency-sensitive applications.

    X

    Decreasing the use of key apps contradicts business objectives.

    Contributing factors:
    Unreliable router software

    Actors: Network provider, router vendor, router software vendor, IT department

    Asset/resource: Network, router, router software

    Risk response:
    Replace the vendor that provides routers and router software.

    Replacing the vendor would reduce network outages at a relatively low cost.

    Symptoms:
    Network outage

    Actors: All business units, network provider

    Asset/resource: Network, business operations, employee productivity

    Risk response:
    Replace legacy systems.

    X

    Replacing legacy systems would be too costly.

    3.1.3 Identify and assess risk responses

    Instructions:
    Complete the following steps for each risk event.
    1. Identify a risk response action that will help reduce the likelihood of occurrence or the impact if the event were to occur.
      • Indicate the type of risk response (avoidance, mitigation, transfer, acceptance, or no risk exists).
    2. Assign each risk response action a residual likelihood level and a residual impact level.
      • This is the same step performed in Activity 2.2.6, when initial likelihood and impact levels were determined; however, now you are estimating the likelihood and impact of the risk event after the risk response action has been implemented successfully.
      • The Risk Register Tool will generate a residual risk severity level for each risk event.
    3. Identify the potential Risk Action Owner (Project Manager) if the response is selected and turned into an IT project, and document this in the Risk Register Tool.
    Document the following in the Risk Event Action Plan for each risk event:
      • Risk response actions
      • Residual likelihood and impact levels
      • Residual risk severity level
    • Review the following slides about the four types of risk response to help complete the activity.
      1. Avoidance
      2. Mitigation
      3. Transfer
      4. Acceptance

    Record the results in the Risk Event Action Plan.

    Take actions to avoid the risk entirely

    Risk Avoidance

    • Risk avoidance involves taking evasive maneuvers to avoid the risk event.
    • Risk avoidance targets risk likelihood, decreasing the likelihood of the risk event occurring.
    • Since risk avoidance measures are fairly drastic, the likelihood is often reduced to negligible levels.
    • However, risk avoidance response actions often sacrifice potential benefits to eliminate the possibility of the risk entirely.
    • Typically, risk avoidance measures should only be taken for risk events with extremely high severity and when the severity (expected cost) of the risk event exceeds the cost (benefits sacrificed) of avoiding the risk.

    Example

    Risk event: Information security vulnerability from third-party cloud services provider.

    • Risk avoidance action: Store all data in-house.
    • Benefits sacrificed: Cost savings, storage flexibility, etc.
    Stock photo of a person hikiing along a damp, foggy, valley path.

    Pursue projects that reduce the likelihood or impact of the risk event

    Risk Mitigation

    • Risk mitigation actions are risk responses that reduce the likelihood and impact of the risk event.
    • Risk mitigation actions can be to either implement new controls or enhance existing ones.
    Example 1

    Most risk responses will reduce both the likelihood of the risk event occurring and its potential impact.

    Example

    Mitigation: Purchase and implement enterprise mobility management (EMM) software with remote wipe capability.

    • EMM reduces the likelihood that sensitive data is accessed by a nefarious actor.
    • The remote-wipe capability reduces the impact by closing the window that sensitive data can be accessed from.
    Example 2

    However, some risk responses will have a greater effect on decreasing the likelihood of a risk event with little effect on decreasing impact.

    Example

    Mitigation: Create policies that restrict which personnel can access sensitive data on mobile devices.

    • This mitigation decreases the number of corporate phones that have access to (or are storing) sensitive data, thereby decreasing the likelihood that a device is compromised.
    Example 3

    Others will reduce the potential impact without decreasing its likelihood of occurring.

    Example

    Mitigation: Use robust encryption for all sensitive data.

    • Corporate-issued mobile phones are just as likely to fall into the hands of nefarious actors, but the financial impact they can inflict on the organization is greatly reduced.

    Pursue projects that reduce the likelihood or impact of the risk event (continued)

    Use the following IT functions to guide your selection of risk mitigation actions:

    Process Improvement

    Key processes that would most directly improve the risk profile:

    • Change Management
    • Project Management
    • Vendor Management
    Infrastructure Management
    • Disaster Recovery Plan/Business Continuity Plan
    • Redundancy and Resilience
    • Preventative Maintenance
    • Physical Environment Security
    Personnel
    • Greater staff depth in key areas
    • Increased discipline around documentation
    • Knowledge Management
    • Training
    Rationalization and Simplification

    This is a foundational activity, as complexity is a major source of risk:

    • Application Rationalization – reducing the number of applications
    • Data Management – reducing the volume and locations of data

    Transfer risks to a third party

    Risk transfer: the exchange of uncertain future costs for fixed present costs.

    Insurance

    The most common form of risk transfer is the purchase of insurance.

    • The uncertain future cost of an IT risk event can be transferred to an insurance company who assumes the risk in exchange for insurance premiums.
    • The most common form of IT-relevant insurance is cyberinsurance.

    Not all risks can be insured. Insurable risks typically possess the following five characteristics:

    1. The loss must be accidental (the risk event cannot be insured if it could have been avoided by taking reasonable actions).
    2. The insured cannot profit from the occurrence of the risk event.
    3. The loss must be able to be measured in monetary terms.
    4. The organization must have an insurable interest (it must be the party that incurs the loss).
    5. An insurance company must offer insurance against that risk.
    Other Forms of Risk Transfer

    Other forms of risk transfer include:

    • Self-insurance
      • Appropriate funds can be set aside in advance to address the financial impact of a risk event should it occur.
    • Warranties
    • Contractual transfer
      • The financial impact of a risk event can be transferred to a third party through clauses agreed to in a contract.
      • For example, a vendor can be contractually obligated to assume all costs resulting from failing to secure the organization’s data.
    • Example email addressing fields of an IT Risk Transfer to an insurance company.

    Accept risks that fall below established thresholds

    Risk Acceptance

    Accepting a risk means tolerating the expected cost of a risk event. It is a conscious and deliberate decision to retain the threat.

    You may choose to accept a risk event for one of the following three reasons:

    1. The risk severity (expected cost) of the risk event falls below acceptability thresholds and does not justify an investment in a risk avoidance, mitigation, or transfer measure.
    2. The risk severity (expected cost) exceeds acceptability thresholds but all effective risk avoidance, mitigation, and transfer measures are ineffective or prohibitively expensive.
    3. The risk severity (expected cost) exceeds acceptability thresholds but there are no feasible risk avoidance, mitigation, and transfer measures to be implemented.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Constant monitoring and the assignment of responsibility and accountability for accepted risk events is crucial for effective management of these risks. No IT risk should be accepted without detailed documentation outlining the reasoning behind that decision and evidence of approval by senior management.

    3.1.4 Risk response cost-benefit analysis (optional)

    The purpose of a cost-benefit analysis (CBA) is to guide financial decision making.

    This helps IT make risk-conscious investment decisions that fall within the IT budget and helps the organization make sound budgetary decisions for risk response projects that cannot be addressed by IT’s existing budget.

    Instructions:
    1. Reopen the Risk Costing Tool. For each risk that you conducted an expected cost assessment in section 2.2 for, find the Excel sheet that corresponds to the risk number (e.g. R001).
    2. Identify between one and four risk response options for the risk event and document them in the Risk Costing Tool.
      • The “Risk Response 1” field will be automatically populated with expected cost data for a scenario where no action was taken (risk acceptance). This will serve as a baseline for comparing alternative responses.
      • For the following steps, go through the risk responses one by one.
    3. Estimate the first-year cost for the risk response.
      • This cost should reflect initial capital expenditures and first-year operating expenditures.
    Screenshot of the Risk Response cost-benefit-analysis from the Risk Costing Tool with 'Capital Expenditures' and 'Operating Expenditures' highlighted.

    Record the results in the Risk Costing Tool.

    3.1.4 Risk response cost-benefit analysis (continued)

    The purpose of a cost-benefit analysis (CBA) is to guide financial decision making.

    Instructions:

    1. Estimate residual risk likelihood and financial impact for Year 1 with the risk response in place.
      • Rather than estimating the likelihood level (low, medium, high), determine a precise likelihood value of the risk event occurring once the response has been implemented.
      • Estimate the dollar value of financial impacts if the risk event were to occur with the risk response in place.
      • Screenshot of the Risk Response cost-benefit-analysis from the Risk Costing Tool with figured for 'Financial Impact' and 'Probability' highlighted. The tool will calculate the expected residual cost of the risk event: (Financial Impact x Likelihood) - Costs = Expected Residual Cost
    2. Select the highest value risk response and document it in the Risk Register Tool.
    3. Document your analysis and recommendations in the Risk Event Action Plan.

    Note: See Activity 3.1.5 to build multi-year cost projections for risk responses.

    3.1.5 Create multi-year cost projections (optional)

    Select between risk response options by projecting their costs and benefits over multiple years.

    • It can be difficult to choose between risk response options that require different payment schedules. A risk response project with costs spread out over more than one year (e.g. incremental upgrades to an IT system) may be more advantageous than a project with costs concentrated up front that may cost less in the long run (e.g. replacing the system).
    • However, the impact that risk response projects have on reducing risk severity is not necessarily static. For example, an expensive project like replacing a system may drastically reduce the risk severity of a system failure. Whereas, incremental system upgrades may only marginally reduce risk severity in the short term but reach similar levels as a full system replacement in a few years.
    Instructions:

    Calculate expected cost for multiple years using the Risk Costing Tool for:

    • Risk events that are subject to change in severity over time.
    • Risk responses that reduce the severity of the risk gradually.
    • Risk responses that cannot be implemented immediately.

    Copy and paste the graphs into the Risk Report and the Risk Event Action Plan for the risk event.

    Sample charts on the cost of risk responses from the Risk Costing Tool.

    Record the results in the Risk Costing Tool.

    Step 3.2

    Report IT Risk Priorities

    Activities
    • 3.2.1 Obtain executive approval for risk action plans
    • 3.2.2 Socialize the Risk Report
    • 3.2.3 Transfer ownership of risk responses to project managers
    • 3.2.4 Finalize the Risk Management Program Manual

    This step involves the following participants:

    • IT risk council
    • Relevant business stakeholders
    • Representation from senior management team

    Outcomes of this step

    • Obtained approval for risk action plans
    • Communicated IT’s risk recommendations to senior leadership
    • Embedded risk management into day-to-day IT operations

    Monitor, Respond, and Report on IT Risk

    Step 3.1 Step 3.2

    Effectively deliver IT risk expertise to the business

    Communicate IT risk management in two directions:

    1. Up to senior leadership (and ERM if applicable)
    2. Down to IT employees (embedding risk awareness)
    3. Visualization of communicating Up to 'Senior Leadership' and Down to 'IT Personnel'.

    Create a strong paper trail and obtain sign-off for the ITRC’s recommendations.

    Now that you have collected all of the necessary raw data, you must communicate your insights and recommendations effectively.

    A fundamental task of risk management is communicating risk information to senior management. It is your responsibility to enable them to make informed risk decisions. This can be considered upward communication.

    The two primary goals of upward communication are:

    1. Transferring accountability for high-priority IT risks to the ERM or to senior leadership.
    2. Obtaining funds for risk response projects recommended by the ITRC.

    Good risk management also has a trickle-down effect impacting all of IT. This can be considered downward communication.

    The two primary goals of downward communication are:

    1. Fostering a risk-aware IT culture.
    2. Ensuring that the IT risk management program maintains momentum and runs effectively.

    3.2.1 Obtain executive approval for risk action plans

    Best Practices and Key Benefits

    Best practice is for all acceptable risks to also be signed-off by senior leadership. However, for ITRCs that brainstorm 100+ risks, this may not be possible. If this is the case, prioritize accepted risks that were assessed to be closest to the organization’s thresholds.

    By receiving a stamp of approval for each key risk from senior management, you ensure that:

    1. The organization is aware of important IT risks that may impact business objectives.
    2. The organization supports the risk assessment conducted by the ITRC.
    3. The organization supports the plan of action and monitoring responsibilities proposed by the ITRC.
    4. If a risk event were to occur, the organization holds ultimate accountability.
    Sample of the Risk Event Action Plan template.

    Task:
    All IT risks that were flagged for exceeding the organization’s severity thresholds must obtain sign-off by the CIO or another member of the senior leadership team.

    • In the assessment phase, you evaluated risks using severity thresholds approved by the business and determined whether or not they justified a risk response.
    • Whether your recommendation was to accept the risk or to analyze possible risk responses, the business should be made aware of most IT risks.

    3.2.2 Socialize the risk report

    Create a succinct, impactful document that summarizes the outcomes of risk assessment and highlights the IT risk council’s top recommendations to the senior leadership team.

    The Risk Report contains:
    • An executive summary page highlighting the main takeaways for senior management:
      • A short summary of results from the most recent risk assessment
      • Dashboard
      • A list of top 10 risks ordered from most severe to least
    • Subsequent individual risk analyses (1 to 10)
      • Detailed risk assessment data
      • Risk responses
      • Risk response analysis
      • Multi-year cost projection (see the following slide)
      • Dashboard
      • Recommendations
    Sample of the Risk Report template.

    Risk Report

    Pursue projects that reduce the likelihood or impact of the risk event

    Encourage risk awareness to extend the benefits of risk management to every aspect of IT.

    Benefits of risk awareness:

    • More preventative and proactive approaches to IT projects are discussed and considered.
    • Changes to the IT threat landscape are more likely to be detected, communicated, and acted upon.
    • IT possesses a realistic perception of its ability to perform functions and provide services.
    • Contingency plans are put in place to hedge against risk events.
    • Fewer IT risks go unidentified.
    • CIOs and business executives make better risk decisions.

    Consequences of low risk awareness:

    • False confidence about the number of IT risks impacting the organization and their severity.
    • Risk-relevant information is not communicated to the ITRC, which may result in inaccurate risk assessments.
    • Confusion surrounding whose responsibility it is to consider how risk impacts IT decision making.
    • Uncertainty and panic when unanticipated risks impact the IT department and the organization.

    Embedding risk management in the IT department is a full-time job

    Take concrete steps to increase risk-aware decision making in IT.

    The IT risk council plays an instrumental role in fostering a culture of risk awareness throughout the IT department. In addition to periodic risk assessments, fulfilling reporting requirements, and undertaking ongoing monitoring responsibilities, members of the ITRC can take a number of actions to encourage other IT employees to adopt a risk-focused approach, particularly at the project planning stage.

    Embed risk management in project planning

    Make time for discussing project risks at every project kick-off.
    • A main benefit of including senior personnel from across IT in the ITRC is that they are able to disseminate the IT risk council’s findings to their respective practices.
    • At project kick-off meetings, schedule time to identify and assess project-specific risks.
    • Encourage the project team to identify strategies to reduce the likelihood and impact of those risks and document these in the project charter.
    • Lead by example by being clear and open about what constitutes acceptable and unacceptable risks.

    Embed risk management with employee

    Train IT staff on the ITRC’s planned responses to specific risk events.
    • If a response to a particular risk event is not to implement a project but rather to institute new policies or procedures, ensure that changes are communicated to employees and that they receive training.
    Provide risk management education opportunities.
    • Remember that a more risk-aware IT employee provides more value to the organization.
    • Invest in your employees by encouraging them to pursue education opportunities like receiving risk management accreditation or providing them with educational experiences such as workshops, seminars, and eLearning.

    Embedding risk management in the IT department is a full-time job (continued)

    Encourage risk awareness by adjusting performance metrics and job titles.

    Performance metrics:

    Depending on the size of your IT department and the amount of resources dedicated to ongoing risk management, you may consider embedding risk management responsibilities into the performance assessments of certain ITRC members or other IT personnel.

    • Personalize the risk management program metrics you have documented in your Risk Management Program Manual.
    • Evidence that KPIs are monitored and frequently reported is also a good indicator that risk owners are fulfilling their risk management responsibilities.
    • Info-Tech Insight

      If risk management responsibilities are not built into performance assessments, it is less likely that they will invest time and energy into these tasks. Adding risk management metrics to performance assessments directly links good job performance with good risk management, making it more likely that ITRC activities and initiatives gain traction throughout the IT department.

    Job descriptions:

    Changing job titles to reflect the focus of an individual’s role on managing IT risk may be a good way to distinguish personnel tasked with developing KRIs and monitoring risks on a week-to-week basis.

    • Some examples include IT Risk Officer, IT Risk Manager, and IT Risk Analyst.

    3.2.3 Transfer ownership of risk responses to project managers

    Once risk responses have obtained approval and funding, it is time to transform them into fully-fledged projects.

    Image of a hand giving a key to another hand and a circle split into quadrants of Governance with 'Governance of Risks' being put into 'Governance of Projects'.

    3.2.4 Finalize the Risk Management Program Manual

    Go back through the Risk Management Program Manual and ensure that the material will accurately reflect your approach to risk management going forward.

    Remember, the program manual is a living document that should be evolving alongside your risk management program, reflecting best practices, knowledge, and experiences accrued from your own assessments and experienced risk events.

    The best way to ensure that the program manual continues to guide and document your risk management program is to make it the focal point of every ITRC meeting and ensure that one participant is tasked with making necessary adjustments and additions.

    Sample of the Risk Management Program Manual. Risk Management Program Manual

    “Upon completing the Info-Tech workshop, the deliverables that we were left with were really outstanding. We put together a 3-year project plan from a high level, outlining projects that will touch upon our high risk areas.” (Director of Security & Risk, Water Management Company)

    Don’t allow your risk management program to flatline

    54% of small businesses haven’t implemented controls to respond to the threat of cyber attacks (Source: Insurance Bureau of Canada, 2021)

    Don’t be lulled into a false sense of security. It might be your greatest risk.

    So you’ve identified the most important IT risks and implemented projects to protect IT and the business.

    Unfortunately, your risk assessment is already outdated.

    Perform regular health checks to keep your finger on the pulse of the key risks threatening the business and your reputation.

    To continue the momentum of your newly forged IT risk management program, read Info-Tech’s research on conducting periodic risk assessments and “health checks”:

    Revive Your Risk Management Program With a Regular Health Check

    • Complete Info-Tech’s Risk Management Health Check to seize the momentum you created by building a robust IT risk management program and create a process for conducting periodic health checks and embedding ongoing risk management into every aspect of IT.
    • Our focus is on using data to make IT risk assessment less like an art and more like a science. Ongoing data-driven risk management is self-improving and grounded in historical data.

    Appendix I: Familiarize yourself with key risk terminology

    Review important risk management terms and definitions.

    Risk

    An uncertain event or set of events which, should it occur, will have an effect on the achievement of objectives. A risk consists of a combination of the likelihood of a perceived threat or opportunity occurring and the magnitude of its impact on objectives (Office of Government Commerce, 2007).

    Threat

    An event that can create a negative outcome (e.g. hostile cyber/physical attacks, human errors).

    Vulnerability

    A weakness that can be taken advantage of in a system (e.g. weakness in hardware, software, business processes).

    Risk Management

    The systematic application of principles, approaches, and processes to the tasks of identifying and assessing risks, and then planning and implementing risk responses. This provides a disciplined environment for proactive decision making (Office of Government Commerce, 2007).

    Risk Category

    Distinct from a risk event, a category is an abstract profile of risk. It represents a common group of risks. For example, you can group certain types of risks under the risk category of IT Operations Risks.

    Risk Event

    A specific occurrence of an event that falls under a particular risk category. For example, a phishing attack is a risk event that falls under the risk category of IT Security Risks.

    Risk Appetite

    An organization’s attitude towards risk taking, which determines the amount of risk that it considers acceptable. Risk appetite also refers to an organization’s willingness to take on certain levels of exposure to risk, which is influenced by the organization’s capacity to financially bear risk.

    Enterprise Risk Management

    (ERM) – A strategic business discipline that supports the achievement of an organization’s objectives by addressing the full spectrum of organizational risks and managing the combined impact of those risks as an interrelated risk portfolio (RIMS, 2015).

    Appendix II: Likelihood vs. Frequency

    Why we measure likelihood, not frequency:

    The basic formula of Likelihood x Impact = Severity is a common methodology used across risk management frameworks. However, some frameworks measure likelihood using Frequency rather than Likelihood.

    Frequency is typically measured as the number of instances an event occurs over a given period of time (e.g. once per month).

    • For risk assessment, historical data regarding the frequency of a risk event is commonly used to indicate the likelihood that the event will happen in the future.

    Likelihood is a numerical representation of the “degree of belief” that the risk event will occur in a given future timeframe (e.g. 25% likelihood that the event will occur within the next year).

    False Objectivity

    While some may argue that frequency provides an objective measurement of likelihood, it is well understood in the field of likelihood theory that historical data regarding the frequency of a risk event may have little bearing over the likelihood of that event happening in the future. Frequency is often an indication of future likelihood but should not be considered an objective measurement of it.

    Likelihood scales that use frequency underestimate the magnitude of risks that lack historical precedent. For example, an IT department that has never experienced a high-impact data breach would adopt a very low likelihood score using the frequentist approach. However, if all of the organization’s major competitors have suffered a major breach within the last two years, they ought to possess a much higher degree of belief that the risk event will occur within the next year.

    Likelihood is a more comprehensive measurement of future likelihood, as frequency can be used to inform the selection of a likelihood value. The process of selecting intersubjective likelihood values will naturally internalize historical data such as the frequency that the event occurred in the past. Further, the frequency that the event is expected to occur in the future can be captured by the expected impact value. For example, a risk event that has an expected impact per occurrence of $10,000 that is expected to occur three times over the next year has an expected impact of $30,000.

    Appendix III: Should max impacts sway decision making?

    Don’t just fixate on the most likely impact – be aware of high-impact outcomes.

    During assessment, risks are evaluated according to their most likely financial impact.

    • For example, a service outage will likely last for two hours and may have an expected cost of $14,000.

    Naturally, focusing on the most likely financial impact will exclude higher impacts that – while theoretically possible – are so unlikely that they do not warrant any real consideration.

    • For example, it is possible that a service outage could last for days; however, the likelihood for such an event may be well below 1%.

    While the risk severity level assessment allows you to present impacts as a range of values (e.g. $50,000 to $75,000), the expected cost assessment requires you to select specific values.

    • However, this analysis may fail to consider much higher potential impacts that have non-negligible likelihood values (likelihood values that you cannot ignore).
    • What you consider “non-negligible” will depend on your organizational risk tolerance/appetite.

    Sometimes called Black Swan events or Fat-Tailed outcomes, high-impact events may occur when the far right of the likelihood distribution – or the “tail” – is thicker than a normal distribution (see fig. 2).

    • A good example is a data breach. While small to medium impacts are far more likely to occur than a devastating intrusion, the high-impact scenario cannot be ignored completely.

    For risk events that contain non-negligible likelihoods (too high to be ignored) consider elevating the risk severity level or expected cost.

    Figure 1 is a graph presenting a 'Normal Likelihood Distribution', the axes being 'Likelihood' and 'Financial Impact'.
    Figure 2 is a graph presenting a 'Fat-Tailed Likelihood Distribution' with a point at the top of the parabola labelled 'Most Likely Impact' but with a much wider bottom labelled 'Fat-Tailed Outcomes', the axes being 'Likelihood' and 'Financial Impact'.

    Leverage Info-Tech’s research on security and compliance risk to identify additional risk events

    Title card of the Info-tech blueprint 'Take Control of Compliance Improvement to Conquer Every Audit' with subtitle 'Don't gamble recklessly with external compliance. Play a winning system and take calculated risks to stack the odds in your favor.


    Take Control of Compliance Improvement to Conquer Every Audit

    Info-Tech Insight

    Don’t gamble recklessly with external compliance. Play a winning system and take calculated risks to stack the odds in your favor.

    Take an agile approach to analyze your gaps and prioritize your remediations. You don’t always have to be fully compliant as long as your organization understands and can live with the consequences.

    Stock photo of a woman sitting at a computer surrounded by rows of computers.


    Develop and Implement a Security Risk Management Program

    Info-Tech Insight

    Security risk management equals cost effectiveness.

    Time spent upfront identifying and prioritizing risks can mean the difference between spending too much and staying on budget.

    Research Contributors and Experts

    Sandi Conrad
    Principal Research Director
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Christine Coz
    Executive Counsellor
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Milena Litoiu
    Principal Research Director
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Scott Magerfleisch
    Executive Advisor
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Aadil Nanji
    Research Director
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Andy Neill
    Associate Vice-President of Research
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Daisha Pennie
    IT Risk Management
    Oklahoma State University

    Ken Piddington
    CIO and Executive Advisor
    MRE Consulting

    Frank Sewell
    Research Director
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Andrew Sharpe
    Research Director
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Chris Warner
    Consulting Director- Security
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Sterling Bjorndahl
    Director of IT Operations
    eHealth Saskatchewan

    Research Contributors and Experts

    Ibrahim Abdel-Kader
    Research Analyst
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Tamara Dwarika
    Internal Auditor
    A leading North American Utility

    Anne Leroux
    Director
    ES Computer Training

    Ian Mulholland
    Research Director
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Michel Fossé
    Consulting Services Manager
    IBM Canada (LGS)

    Petar Hristov
    Research Director
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Steve Woodward
    Research Director
    CEO, Cloud Perspectives

    *Plus 10 additional interviewees who wish to remain anonymous.

    Bibliography

    “2021 State of the CIO.” IDG, 28 January 2021. Web.

    “4 Reasons Why CIOs Lose Their Jobs.” Silverton Consulting, 2012. Web.

    Beasley, Mark, Bruce Branson, and Bonnie Hancock. “The State of Risk Oversight,” AICPA, April 2021. Web.

    COBIT 2019. ISACA, 2019. Web.

    “Cognyte jeopardized its database exposing 5 billion records, including earlier data breaches.” SecureBlink, 21 June 2021. Web.

    Culp, Steve. “Accenture 2019 Global Risk Management Study, Financial Services Report.” Accenture, 2019. Web.

    Curtis, Patchin, and Mark Carey. “Risk Assessment in Practice.” COSO Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, Deloitte & Touche LLP, 2012. Web.

    “Cyber Risk Management.” Insurance Bureau of Canada (IBC), 2022. Web.

    Eccles, Robert G., Scott C. Newquist, and Roland Schatz. “Reputation and Its Risks.” Harvard Business Review, February 2007. Web.

    Eden, C. and F. Ackermann. Making Strategy: The Journey of Strategic Management. Sage Publications, 1998.

    “Enterprise Risk Management Maturity Model.” OECD, 9 February 2021. Web.

    Ganguly, Saptarshi, Holger Harreis, Ben Margolis, and Kayvaun Rowshankish. “Digital Risks: Transforming risk management for the 2020s.” McKinsey & Company, 10 February 2017. Web.

    “Governance Institute of Australia Risk Management Survey 2020.” Governance Institute of Australia, 2020. Web.

    “Guidance on Enterprise Risk Management.” COSO, 2022. Web.

    Henriquez, Maria. “The Top 10 Data Breaches of 2021” Security Magazine, 9 December 2021. Web.

    Holmes, Aaron. “533 million Facebook users’ phone numbers and personal data have been leaked online.” Business Insider, 3 April 2021. Web.

    Bibliography

    “Integrated Risk and Compliance Management for Banks and Financial Services Organizations: Benefits of a Holistic Approach.” MetricStream, 2022. Web.

    “ISACA’s Risk IT Framework Offers a Structured Methodology for Enterprises to Manage Information and Technology Risk.” ISACA, 25 June 2020. Web.

    ISO 31000 Risk Management. ISO, 2018. Web.

    Lawton, George. “10 Enterprise Risk Management Trends in 2022.” TechTarget, 2 February 2022. Web.

    Levenson, Michael. “MGM Resorts Says Data Breach Exposed Some Guests’ Personal Information.” The New York Times, 19 February 2020. Web.

    Management of Risk (M_o_R): Guidance for Practitioners. Office of Government Commerce, 2007. Web.

    “Many small businesses vulnerable to cyber attacks.” Insurance Bureau of Canada (IBC), 5 October 2021.

    Maxwell, Phil. “Why risk-informed decision-making matters.” EY, 3 December 2019. Web.

    “Measuring and Mitigating Reputational Risk.” Marsh, September 2014. Web.

    Natarajan, Aarthi. “The Top 6 Business Risks you should Prepare for in 2022.” Diligent, 22 December 2021. Web.

    “Operational Risk Management Excellence – Get to Strong Survey: Executive Report.” KMPG and RMA, 2014. Web.

    “Third-party risk is becoming a first priority challenge.” Deloitte, 2022. Web.

    Thomas, Adam, and Dan Kinsella. “Extended Enterprise Risk Management Survey, 2020.” Deloitte, 2021. Web.

    Treasury Board Secretariat. “Guide to Integrated Risk Management.” Government of Canada, 12 May 2016. Web.

    Webb, Rebecca. “6 Reasons Data is Key for Risk Management.” ClearRisk, 13 January 2021. Web.

    “What is Enterprise Risk Management (ERM)?” RIMS, 2015. Web.

    Wiggins, Perry. “Do you spend enough time assessing strategic risks?” CFO, 26 January 2022. Web.

    Create a Holistic IT Dashboard

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}117|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.5/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $8,049 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 8 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Performance Measurement
    • Parent Category Link: /performance-measurement
    • IT leaders do not have a single holistic view of how their 45 IT processes are operating.
    • Expecting any single individual to understand the details of all 45 IT processes is unrealistic.
    • Problems in performance only become evident when the process has already failed.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Mature your IT department by measuring what matters.
    • Don’t measure things just because you can; change what you measure as your organization matures.

    Impact and Result

    • Use Info-Tech’s IT Metrics Library to review typical KPIs for each of the 45 process areas and select those that apply to your organization.
    • Configure your IT Management Dashboard to record your selected KPIs and start to measure performance.
    • Set up the cadence for review of the KPIs and develop action plans to improve low-performing indicators.

    Create a Holistic IT Dashboard Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out how to develop your KPI program that leads to improved performance.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Choose the KPIs

    Identify the KPIs that matter to your organization’s goals.

    • Create a Holistic IT Dashboard – Phase 1: Choose the KPIs
    • IT Metrics Library

    2. Build the Dashboard

    Use the IT Management Dashboard on the Info-Tech website to display your chosen KPIs.

    • Create a Holistic IT Dashboard – Phase 2: Build the Dashboard

    3. Create the Action Plan

    Use the review of your KPIs to build an action plan to drive performance.

    • Create a Holistic IT Dashboard – Phase 3: Build the Action Plan
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Create a Holistic IT Dashboard

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Identify What to Measure (Offsite)

    The Purpose

    Determine the KPIs that matter to your organization.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Identify organizational goals

    Identify IT goals and their organizational goal alignment

    Identify business pain points

    Activities

    1.1 Identify organizational goals.

    1.2 Identify IT goals and organizational alignment.

    1.3 Identify business pain points.

    Outputs

    List of goals and pain points to create KPIs for

    2 Configure the Dashboard Tool (Onsite)

    The Purpose

    Learn how to configure and use the IT Management Dashboard.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Configured IT dashboard

    Initial IT scorecard report

    Activities

    2.1 Review metrics and KPI best practices.

    2.2 Use the IT Metrics Library.

    2.3 Select the KPIs for your organization.

    2.4 Use the IT Management Dashboard.

    Outputs

    Definition of KPIs to be used, data sources, and ownership

    Configured IT dashboard

    3 Review and Develop the Action Plan

    The Purpose

    Learn how to review and plan actions based on the KPIs.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Lead KPI review to actions to improve performance

    Activities

    3.1 Create the scorecard report.

    3.2 Interpret the results of the dashboard.

    3.3 Use the IT Metrics Library to review suggested actions.

    Outputs

    Initial IT scorecard report

    Action plan with initial actions

    4 Improve Your KPIs (Onsite)

    The Purpose

    Use your KPIs to drive performance.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Improve your metrics program to drive effectiveness

    Activities

    4.1 Develop your action plan.

    4.2 Execute the plan and tracking progress.

    4.3 Develop new KPIs as your practice matures.

    Outputs

    Understanding of how to develop new KPIs using the IT Metrics Library

    5 Next Steps and Wrap-Up (Offsite)

    The Purpose

    Ensure all documentation and plans are complete.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Documented next steps

    Activities

    5.1 Complete IT Metrics Library documentation.

    5.2 Document decisions and next steps.

    Outputs

    IT Metrics Library

    Action plan

    Further reading

    Create a Holistic IT Dashboard

    Mature your IT department by measuring what matters.

    Executive Brief

    Analyst Perspective

    Measurement alone provides only minimal improvements

    It’s difficult for CIOs and other top-level leaders of IT to know if everything within their mandate is being managed effectively. Gaining visibility into what’s happening on the front lines without micromanaging is a challenge most top leaders face.

    Understanding Info-Tech’s Management and Governance Framework of processes that need to be managed and being able to measure what’s important to their organization's success can give leaders the ability to focus on their key responsibilities of ensuring service effectiveness, enabling increased productivity, and creating the ability for their teams to innovate.

    Even if you know what to measure, the measurement alone will lead to minimal improvements. Having the right methods in place to systematically collect, review, and act on those measurements is the differentiator to driving up the maturity of your IT organization.

    The tools in this blueprint can help you identify what to measure, how to review it, and how to create effective plans to improve performance.

    Tony Denford

    Research Director, Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    • IT leaders do not have a single holistic view of how their IT processes are operating.
    • Expecting any single individual to understand the details of all IT processes is unrealistic.
    • Problems in performance only become evident when the process has already failed.

    Common Obstacles

    • Business changes quickly, and what should be measured changes as a result.
    • Most measures are trailing indicators showing past performance.
    • Measuring alone does not result in improved performance.
    • There are thousands of operational metrics that could be measured, but what are the right ones for an overall dashboard?

    Info-Tech's Approach

    • Use Info-Tech’s IT Metrics Library to review typical KPIs for each of the process areas and select those that apply to your organization.
    • Configure your IT Management Dashboard to record your selected KPIs and start to measure performance.
    • Set up the cadence for review of the KPIs and develop action plans to improve low-performing indicators.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Mature your IT department by aligning your measures with your organizational goals. Acting early when your KPIs deviate from the goals leads to improved performance.

    Your challenge

    This research is designed to help organizations quickly choose holistic measures, review the results, and devise action plans.

    • The sheer number of possible metrics can be overwhelming. Choose metrics from our IT Metrics Library or choose your own, but always ensure they are in alignment with your organizational goals.
    • Ensure your dashboard is balanced across all 45 process areas that a modern CIO is responsible for.
    • Finding leading indicators to allow your team to be proactive can be difficult if your team is focused on the day-to-day operational tasks.
    • It can be time consuming to figure out what to do if an indicator is underperforming.

    Build your dashboard quickly using the toolset in this research and move to improvement actions as soon as possible.

    The image is a bar graph, titled KPI-based improvements. On the X-axis are four categories, each with one bar for Before KPIs and another for After KPIs. The categories are: Productivity; Fire Incidents; Request Response Time; and Savings.

    Productivity increased by 30%

    Fire/smoke incidents decreased by 25% (high priority)

    Average work request response time reduced by 64%

    Savings of $1.6 million in the first year

    (CFI, 2013)

    Common obstacles

    These barriers make this challenge difficult to address for many organizations:

    • What should be measured can change over time as your organization matures and the business environment changes. Understanding what creates business value for your organization is critical.
    • Organizations almost always focus on past result metrics. While this is important, it will not indicate when you need to adjust something until it has already failed.
    • It’s not just about measuring. You also need to review the measures often and act on the biggest risks to your organization to drive performance.

    Don’t get overwhelmed by the number of things you can measure. It can take some trial and error to find the measures that best indicate the health of the process.

    The importance of frequent review

    35% - Only 35% of governing bodies review data at each meeting. (Committee of University Chairs, 2008)

    Common obstacles

    Analysis paralysis

    Poor data can lead to incorrect conclusions, limit analysis, and undermine confidence in the value of your dashboard.

    Achieving perfect data is extremely time consuming and may not add much value. It can also be an excuse to avoid getting started with metrics and analytics.

    Data quality is a struggle for many organizations. Consider how much uncertainty you can tolerate in your analysis and what would be required to improve your data quality to an acceptable level. Consider cost, technological resources, people resources, and time required.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Analytics are only as good as the data that informs it. Aim for just enough data quality to make informed decisions without getting into analysis paralysis.

    Common obstacles

    The problem of surrogation

    Tying KPIs and metrics to performance often leads to undesired behavior. An example of this is the now infamous Wells Fargo cross-selling scandal, in which 3.5 million credit card and savings accounts were opened without customers’ consent when the company incented sales staff to meet cross-selling targets.

    Although this is an extreme example, it’s an all-too-common phenomenon.

    A focus on the speed of closure of tickets often leads to shortcuts and lower-quality solutions.

    Tying customer value to the measures can align the team on understanding the objective rather than focusing on the measure itself, and the team will no longer be able to ignore the impact of their actions.

    Surrogation is a phenomenon in which a measure of a behavior replaces the intent of the measure itself. People focus on achieving the measure instead of the behavior the measure was intended to drive.

    Info-Tech’s thought model

    The Threefold Role of the IT Executive Core CIO Objectives
    IT Organization - Manager A - Optimize the Effectiveness of the IT Organization
    Enterprise - Partner B - Boost the Productivity of the Enterprise
    Market - Innovator C - Enable Business Growth Through Technology

    Low-Maturity Metrics Program

    Trailing indicators measure the outcomes of the activities of your organization. Hopefully, the initiatives and activities are aligned with the organizational goals.

    High-Maturity Metrics Program

    The core CIO objectives align with the organizational goals, and teams define leading indicators that show progress toward those goals. KPIs are reviewed often and adjustments are made to improve performance based on the leading indicators. The results are improved outcomes, greater transparency, and increased predictability.

    The image is a horizontal graphic with multiple text boxes. The first (on the left) is a box that reads Organizational Goals, second a second box nested within it that reads Core CIO Objectives. There is an arrow pointing from this box to the right. The arrow connects to a text box that reads Define leading indicators that show progress toward objectives. To the right of that, there is a title Initiatives & activities, with two boxes beneath it: Processes and Projects. Below this middle section, there is an arrow pointing left, with the text: Adjust behaviours. After this, there is an arrow pointing right, to a box with the title Outcomes, and the image of an unlabelled bar graph.

    Info-Tech’s approach

    Adopt an iterative approach to develop the right KPIs for your dashboard

    Periodically: As appropriate, review the effectiveness of the KPIs and adjust as needed.

    Frequently: At least once per month, but the more frequent, the more agility your organization will have.

    The image shows a series of steps in a process, each connected by an arrow. The process is iterative, so the steps circle back on themselves, and repeat. The process begins with IT Metrics Library, then Choose or build KPIs, then Build Dashboard, then Review KPIs and Create action plan. Review KPIs and Create action plan are steps that the graphic indicates should be repeated, so the arrows are arranged in a circle around these two items. Following that, there is an additional step: Are KPIs and action plans leading to improved results? After this step, we return to the Choose or build KPIs step.

    The Info-Tech difference:

    1. Quickly identify the KPIs that matter to your organization using the IT Metrics Library.
    2. Build a presentable dashboard using the IT Management Dashboard available on the Info-Tech website.
    3. When indicators show underperformance, quickly get them back on track using the suggested research in the IT Metrics Library.
    4. If your organization’s needs are different, define your own custom metrics using the same format as the IT Metrics Library.
    5. Use the action plan tool to keep track of progress

    Info-Tech’s methodology for creating a holistic IT dashboard

    1. Choose the KPIs 2. Build the Dashboard 3. Create the Action Plan
    Phase Steps
    1. Review available KPIs
    2. Select KPIs for your organization
    3. Identify data sources and owners
    1. Understand how to use the IT Management Dashboard
    2. Build and review the KPIs
    1. Prioritize low-performing indicators
    2. Review suggested actions
    3. Develop your action plan
    Phase Outcomes A defined and documented list of the KPIs that will be used to monitor each of the practice areas in your IT mandate A configured dashboard covering all the practice areas and the ability to report performance in a consistent and visible way An action plan for addressing low-performing indicators

    Insight summary

    Mature your IT department by aligning your measures with your organizational goals. Acting early when your KPIs deviate from the goals leads to improved performance.

    Don’t just measure things because you can. Change what you measure as your organization becomes more mature.

    Select what matters to your organization

    Measure things that will resolve pain points or drive you toward your goals.

    Look for indicators that show the health of the practice, not just the results.

    Review KPIs often

    Ease of use will determine the success of your metrics program, so keep it simple to create and review the indicators.

    Take action to improve performance

    If indicators are showing suboptimal performance, develop an action plan to drive the indicator in the right direction.

    Act early and often.

    Measure what your customers value

    Ensure you understand what’s valued and measure whether the value is being produced. Let front-line managers focus on tactical measures and understand how they are linked to value.

    Look for predictive measures

    Determine what action will lead to the desired result and measure if the action is being performed. It’s better to predict outcomes than react to them.

    Blueprint deliverables

    Each step of this blueprint is accompanied by supporting deliverables to help you accomplish your goals:

    IT Metrics Library

    Customize the KPIs for your organization using the IT Metrics Library

    IT Metrics Library Action Plan

    Keep track of the actions that are generated from your KPI review

    Key deliverable:

    IT Management Dashboard and Scorecard

    The IT Overall Scorecard gives a holistic view of the performance of each IT function

    Blueprint benefits

    IT Benefits

    • An IT dashboard can help IT departments understand how well they are performing against key indicators.
    • It can allow IT teams to demonstrate to their business partners the areas they are focusing on.
    • Regular review and action planning based on the results will lead to improved performance, efficiency, and effectiveness.
    • Create alignment of IT teams by focusing on common areas of performance.

    Business Benefits

    • Ensure alignment and transparency between the business and IT.
    • Understand the value that IT brings to the operation and strategic initiatives of your organization.
    • Understand the contribution of the IT team to achieving business outcomes.
    • Focus IT on the areas that are important to you by requesting new measures as business needs change.

    Measure the value of this blueprint

    Utilize the existing IT Metrics Library and IT Dashboard tools to quickly kick off your KPI program

    • Developing the metrics your organization should track can be very time consuming. Save approximately 120 hours of effort by choosing from the IT Metrics Library.
    • The need for a simple method to display your KPIs means either developing your own tool or buying one off the shelf. Use the IT Management Dashboard to quickly get your KPI program up and running. Using these tools will save approximately 480 hours.
    • The true value of this initiative comes from using the KPIs to drive performance.

    Keeping track of the number of actions identified and completed is a low overhead measure. Tracking time or money saved is higher overhead but also higher value.

    The image is a screen capture of the document titled Establish Baseline Metrics. It shows a table with the headings: Metric, Current, Goal.

    The image is a chart titled KPI benefits. It includes a legend indicating that blue bars are for Actions identified, purple bars are for Actions completed, and the yellow line is for Time/money saved. The graph shows Q1-Q4, indicating an increase in all areas across the quarters.

    Executive Brief Case Study

    Using data-driven decision making to drive stability and increase value

    Industry: Government Services

    Source: Info-Tech analyst experience

    Challenge

    A newly formed application support team with service desk responsibilities was becoming burned out due to the sheer volume of work landing on their desks. The team was very reactive and was providing poor service due to multiple conflicting priorities.

    To make matters worse, there was a plan to add a major new application to the team’s portfolio.

    Solution

    The team began to measure the types of work they were busy doing and then assessed the value of each type of work.

    The team then problem solved how they could reduce or eliminate their low-value workload.

    This led to tracking how many problems were being resolved and improved capabilities to problem solve effectively.

    Results

    Upon initial data collection, the team was performing 100% reactive workload. Eighteen months later slightly more than 80% of workload was proactive high-value activities.

    The team not only was able to absorb the additional workload of the new application but also identified efficiencies in their interactions with other teams that led to a 100% success rate in the change process and a 92% decrease in resource needs for major incidents.

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    "Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful."

    Guided Implementation

    "Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track."

    Workshop

    "We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place."

    Consulting

    "Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project."

    Diagnostic and consistent frameworks are used throughout all four options.

    Guided Implementation

    What does a typical GI on this topic look like?

    Phase 1 - Choose the KPIs

    Call #1: Scope dashboard and reporting needs.

    Call #2: Learn how to use the IT Metrics Library to select your metrics.

    Phase 2 – Build the Dashboard

    Call #3: Set up the dashboard.

    Call #4: Capture data and produce the report.

    Phase 3 – Create the Action Plan

    Call #5: Review the data and use the metrics library to determine actions.

    Call #6: Improve the KPIs you measure.

    A Guided Implementation (GI) is series of calls with an Info-Tech analyst to help implement our best practices in your organization.

    A typical GI is between 5 and 8 calls over the course of 2 to 3 months.

    Workshop Overview

    Contact your account representative for more information.

    workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8889

    Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5
    Identify What to Measure Configure the Dashboard Tool Review and Develop the Action Plan Improve Your KPIs Compile Workshop Output
    Activities

    1.1 Identify organizational goals.

    1.2 Identify IT goals and organizational alignment.

    1.3 Identify business pain points.

    2.1 Determine metrics and KPI best practices.

    2.2 Learn how to use the IT Metrics Library.

    2.3 Select the KPIs for your organization.

    2.4 Configure the IT Management Dashboard.

    3.1 Create the scorecard report.

    3.2 Interpret the results of the dashboard.

    3.3 Use the IT Metrics Library to review suggested actions.

    4.1 Develop your action plan.

    4.2 Execute the plan and track progress.

    4.3 Develop new KPIs as your practice matures.

    5.1 Complete the IT Metrics Library documentation.

    5.2 Document decisions and next steps.

    Outcomes 1. List of goals and pain points that KPIs will measure

    1. Definition of KPIs to be used, data sources, and ownership

    2. Configured IT dashboard

    1. Initial IT scorecard report

    2. Action plan with initial actions

    1. Understanding of how to develop new KPIs using the IT Metrics Library

    1. IT Metrics Library documentation

    2. Action plan

    Phase 1

    Choose the KPIs

    Phase 1

    1.1 Review Available KPIs

    1.2 Select KPIs for Your Org.

    1.3 Identify Data Sources and Owners

    Phase 2

    2.1 Understand the IT Management Dashboard

    2.2 Build and Review the KPIs

    Phase 3

    3.1 Prioritize Low-Performing Indicators

    3.2 Review Suggested Actions

    3.3 Develop the Action Plan

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    Reviewing and selecting the KPIs suggested in the IT Metrics Library.

    Identifying the data source for the selected KPI and the owner responsible for data collection.

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • Senior IT leadership
    • Process area owners
    • Metrics program owners and administrators

    Step 1.1

    Review Available KPIs

    Activities

    1.1.1 Download the IT Metrics Library and review the KPIs for each practice area.

    Choose the KPIs

    Step 1.1 – Review Available KPIs

    Step 1.2 – Select KPIs for Your Org.

    Step 1.3 – Identify Data Sources and owners

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    Downloading the IT Metrics Library

    Understanding the content of the tool

    Reviewing the intended goals for each practice area

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Senior IT leadership
    • Process area owners
    • Metrics program owners and administrators

    Outcomes of this step

    Downloaded tool ready to select the KPIs for your organization

    Using the IT Metrics Library

    Match the suggested KPIs to the Management and Governance Framework

    The “Practice” and “Process” columns relate to each of the boxes on the Info-Tech Management and Governance Framework. This ensures you are measuring each area that needs to be managed by a typical IT department.

    The image shows a table on the left, and on the right, the Info-Tech Management and Governance Structure. Sections from the Practice and Process columns of the table have arrows emerging from them, pointing to matching sections in the framework.

    Using the IT Metrics Library

    Content for each entry

    KPI - The key performance indicator to review

    CSF - What needs to happen to achieve success for each goal

    Goal - The goal your organization is trying to achieve

    Owner - Who will be accountable to collect and report the data

    Data Source (typical) - Where you plan to get the data that will be used to calculate the KPI

    Baseline/Target - The baseline and target for the KPI

    Rank - Criticality of this goal to the organization's success

    Action - Suggested action if KPI is underperforming

    Blueprint - Available research to address typical underperformance of the KPI

    Practice/Process - Which practice and process the KPI represents

    1.1.1 Download the IT Metrics Library

    Input

    • IT Metrics Library

    Output

    • Ideas for which KPIs would be useful to track for each of the practice areas

    Materials

    • Whiteboard/flip charts

    Participants

    • IT senior leadership
    • Process area owners
    • Metrics program owners and administrators

    4 hours

    1. Click the link below to download the IT Metrics Library spreadsheet.
    2. Open the file and select the “Data Entry” tab.
    3. The sheet has suggested KPIs for each of the 9 practice areas and 45 processes listed in the Info-Tech Management and Governance Framework. You can identify this grouping in the “Practice” and “Process” columns.
    4. For each practice area, review the suggested KPIs and their associated goals and discuss as a team which of the KPIs would be useful to track in your organization.

    Download the IT Metrics Library

    Step 1.2

    Select KPIs for Your Organization

    Activities

    1.2.1 Select the KPIs that will drive your organization forward

    1.2.2 Remove unwanted KPIs from the IT Metrics Library

    Choose the KPIs

    Step 1.1 – Review Available KPIs

    Step 1.2 – Select KPIs for Your Org.

    Step 1.3 – Identify Data Sources and Owners

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Selecting the KPIs for your organization and removing unwanted KPIs from IT Metrics Library

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Senior IT leadership
    • Process area owners
    • Metrics program owners and administrators

    Outcomes of this step

    A shortlist of selected KPIs

    1.2.1 Select the KPIs that will drive your organization forward

    Input

    • IT Metrics Library

    Output

    • KPIs would be useful to track for each of the practice areas

    Materials

    • IT Metrics Library

    Participants

    • Senior IT leadership
    • Process area owners
    • Metrics program owners and administrators

    4 hours

    1. Review the suggested KPIs for each practice area and review the goal.
    2. Some suggested KPIs are similar, so make sure the goal is appropriate for your organization.
    3. Pick up to three KPIs per practice.

    1.2.2 Remove unwanted KPIs

    Input

    • IT Metrics Library

    Output

    • KPIs would be useful to track for each of the practice areas

    Materials

    • IT Metrics Library

    Participants

    • Senior IT leadership
    • Process area owners
    • Metrics program owners and administrators

    0.5 hours

    1. To remove unwanted KPIs from the IT Metric Library Tool, select the unwanted row, right-click on the row, and delete it.
    2. The result should be up to three KPIs per practice area left on the spreadsheet.

    Step 1.3

    Identify data sources and owners

    Activities

    1.3.1 Document the data source

    1.3.2 Document the owner

    1.3.3 Document baseline and target

    Choose the KPIs

    Step 1.1 – Review Available KPIs

    Step 1.2 – Select KPIs for Your Org.

    Step 1.3 – Identify Data Sources and Owners

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    Documenting for each KPI where you plan to get the data, who is accountable to collect and report the data, what the current baseline is (if available), and what the target is

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Senior IT leadership
    • Process area owners
    • Metrics program owners and administrators

    Outcomes of this step

    A list of KPIs for your organization with appropriate attributes documented

    1.3 Identify data sources, owners, baseline, and target

    Input

    • IT Metrics Library

    Output

    • Completed IT Metrics Library

    Materials

    • IT Metrics Library

    Participants

    • Process area owners
    • Metrics program owners and administrators

    2 hours

    1. For each selected KPI, complete the owner, data source, baseline, and target if the information is available.
    2. If the information is not available, document the owner and assign them to complete the other columns.

    Phase 2

    Build the Dashboard

    Phase 1

    1.1 Review Available KPIs

    1.2 Select KPIs for Your Org.

    1.3 Identify Data Sources and Owners

    Phase 2

    2.1 Understand the IT Management Dashboard

    2.2 Build and Review the KPIs

    Phase 3

    3.1 Prioritize Low-Performing Indicators

    3.2 Review Suggested Actions

    3.3 Develop the Action Plan

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    Understanding the IT Management Dashboard

    Configuring the IT Management Dashboard and entering initial measures

    Produce thing IT Scorecard from the IT Management Dashboard

    Interpreting the results

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • Senior IT leadership
    • Process area owners
    • Metrics program owners and administrators

    Step 2.1

    Understand the IT Management Dashboard

    Activities

    2.1.1 Logging into the IT Management Dashboard

    2.1.2 Understanding the “Overall Scorecard” tab

    2.1.3 Understanding the “My Metrics” tab

    Build the Dashboard

    Step 2.1 – Understand the IT Management Dashboard

    Step 2.2 – Build and review the KPIs

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    Accessing the IT Management Dashboard

    Basic functionality of the tool

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Senior IT leadership
    • Process area owners
    • Metrics program owners and administrators

    Outcomes of this step

    Understanding of how to administer the IT Management Dashboard

    2.1.1 Logging into the IT Management Dashboard

    Input

    • Info-Tech membership

    Output

    • Access to the IT Management Dashboard

    Materials

    • Web browser

    Participants

    • Metrics program owners and administrators

    0.5 hours

    1. Using your web browser, access your membership at infotech.com.
    2. Log into your Info-Tech membership account.
    3. Select the “My IT Dashboard” option from the menu (circled in red).
    4. If you cannot gain access to the tool, contact your membership rep.

    The image is a screen capture of the Info-Tech website, with the Login button at the top right of the window circled in red.

    2.1.2 Understanding the “Overall Scorecard” tab

    0.5 hours

    1. Once you select “My IT Dashboard,” you will be in the “Overall Scorecard” tab view.
    2. Scrolling down reveals the data entry form for each of the nine practice areas in the Info-Tech Management and Governance Framework, with each section color-coded for easy identification.
    3. Each of the section headers, KPI names, data sources, and data values can be updated to fit the needs of your organization.
    4. This view is designed to show a holistic view of all areas in IT that are being managed.

    2.1.3 Understanding the “My Metrics” tab

    0.5 hours

    1. On the “My Metrics” tab you can access individual scorecards for each of the nine practice areas.
    2. Below the “My Metrics” tab is each of the nine practice areas for you to select from. Each shows a different subset of KPIs specific to the practice.
    3. The functionality of this view is the same as the overall scorecard. Each title, KPI, description, and actuals are editable to fit your organization’s needs.
    4. This blueprint does not go into detail on this tab, but it is available to be used by practice area leaders in the same way as the overall scorecard.

    Step 2.2

    Build and review the KPIs

    Activities

    2.2.1 Entering the KPI descriptions

    2.2.2 Entering the KPI actuals

    2.2.3 Producing the IT Overall Scorecard

    Build the Dashboard

    Step 2.1 – Understand the IT Management Dashboard

    Step 2.2 – Build and review the KPIs

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    Entering the KPI descriptions

    Entering the actuals for each KPI

    Producing the IT Overall Scorecard

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Senior IT leadership
    • Process area owners
    • Metrics program owners and administrators

    Outcomes of this step

    An overall scorecard indicating the selected KPI performance

    2.2.1 Entering the KPI descriptions

    Input

    • Access to the IT Management Dashboard
    • IT Metrics Library with your organization’s KPIs selected

    Output

    • KPI descriptions entered into tool

    Materials

    • Web browser

    Participants

    • Metrics program owners and administrators

    1 hour

    1. Navigate to the IT Management Dashboard as described in section 2.1.1 and scroll down to the practice area you wish to complete.
    2. If needed, modify the section name to match your organization’s needs.
    3. Select “Add another score.”

    2.2.1 Entering the KPI descriptions

    1 hour

    1. Select if your metric is a custom metric or a standard metric available from one of the Info-Tech diagnostic tools.
    2. Enter the metric name you selected from the IT Metrics Library.
    3. Select the value type.
    4. Select the “Add Metric” button.
    5. The descriptions only need to be entered when they change.

    Example of a custom metric

    The image is a screen capture of the Add New Metric function. The metric type selected is Custom metric, and the metric name is Employee Engagement. There is a green Add Metric button, which is circled in red.

    Example of a standard metric

    The image is a screen capture of the Add New Metric function. The metric type selected is Standard Metric. The green Add Metric button at the bottom is circled in red.

    2.2.2 Entering the KPI actuals

    Input

    • Actual data from each data source identified

    Output

    • Actuals recorded in tool

    Materials

    • Web browser

    Participants

    • Metrics program owners and administrators

    1 hour

    1. Select the period you wish to create a scorecard for by selecting “Add New Period” or choosing one from the drop-down list.
    2. For each KPI on your dashboard, collect the data from the data source and enter the actuals.
    3. Select the check mark (circled) to save the data for the period.

    The image is a screen capture of the My Overall Scorecard Metrics section, with a button at the bottom that reads Add New Period circled in red

    The image has the text People and Resources at the top. It shows data for the KPI, and there is a check mark circled in red.

    2.2.3 Producing the IT Overall Scorecard

    Input

    • Completed IT Overall Scorecard data collection

    Output

    • IT Overall Scorecard

    Materials

    • Web browser

    Participants

    • Metrics program owners and administrators

    0.5 hours

    1. Select the period you wish to create a scorecard for by selecting from the drop-down list.
    2. Click the “Download as PDF” button to produce the scorecard.
    3. Once the PDF is produced it is ready for review or distribution.

    Phase 3

    Create the Action Plan

    Phase 1

    1.1 Review Available KPIs

    1.2 Select KPIs for Your Org.

    1.3 Identify Data Sources and Owners

    Phase 2

    2.1 Understand the IT Management Dashboard

    2.2 Build and Review the KPIs

    Phase 3

    3.1 Prioritize Low-Performing Indicators

    3.2 Review Suggested Actions

    3.3 Develop the Action Plan

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    Prioritizing low-performing indicators

    Using the IT Metrics Library to review suggested actions

    Developing your team’s action plan to improve performance

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • Senior IT leadership
    • Process area owners
    • Metrics program owners and administrators

    Step 3.1

    Prioritize low-performing indicators

    Activities

    3.1.1 Determine criteria for prioritization

    3.1.2 Identify low-performing indicators

    3.1.3 Prioritize low-performing indicators

    Create the action plan

    Step 3.1 – Prioritize low-performing indicators

    Step 3.2 – Review suggested actions

    Step 3.3 – Develop the action plan

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    Determining the criteria for prioritization of low-performing indicators

    Identifying low-performing indicators

    Prioritizing the low-performing indicators

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Senior IT leadership
    • Process area owners
    • Metrics program owners and administrators

    Outcomes of this step

    A prioritized list of low-performing indicators that need remediation

    3.1.1 Determine criteria for prioritization

    Often when metrics programs are established, there are multiple KPIs that are not performing at the desired level. It’s easy to expect the team to fix all the low-performing indicators, but often teams are stretched and have conflicting priorities.

    Therefore it’s important to spend some time to prioritize which of your indicators are most critical to the success of your business.

    Also consider, if one area is performing well and others have multiple poor indicators, how do you give the right support to optimize the results?

    Lastly, is it better to score slightly lower on multiple measures or perfect on most but failing badly on one or two?

    3.1.1 Determine criteria for prioritization

    Input

    • Business goals and objectives
    • IT goals and objectives
    • IT organizational structure

    Output

    • Documented scorecard remediation prioritization criteria

    Materials

    • Whiteboard or flip charts

    Participants

    • Senior IT leadership
    • Process area owners
    • Metrics program owners and administrators

    1 hour

    1. Identify any KPIs that are critical and cannot fail without high impact to your organization.
    2. Identify any KPIs that cannot fail for an extended period and document the time period.
    3. Rank the KPIs from most critical to least critical in the IT Metrics Library.
    4. Look at the owner accountable for the performance of each KPI. If there are any large groups, reassess the ownership or rank.
    5. Periodically review the criteria to see if they’re aligned with meeting current business goals.

    3.1.2 Identify low-performing indicators

    Input

    • Overall scorecard
    • Overall scorecard (previous period)
    • IT Metrics Library

    Output

    • List of low-performing indicators that need remediation
    • Planned actions to improve performance

    Materials

    • Whiteboard or flip charts

    Participants

    • Senior IT leadership
    • Process area owners
    • Metrics program owners and administrators

    1 hour

    1. Review the overall scorecard for the current period. List any KPIs that are not meeting the target for the current month in the “Action Plan” tab of the IT Metrics Library.
    2. Compare current month to previous month. List any KPIs that are moving away from the long-term target documented in the tool IT Metrics Library.
    3. Revise the target in the IT Metrics Library as business needs change.

    3.1.3 Prioritize low-performing indicators

    Input

    • IT Metrics Library

    Output

    • Prioritized list of planned actions for low-performing indicators

    Materials

    • IT Metrics Library

    Participants

    • Senior IT leadership
    • Process area owners
    • Metrics program owners and administrators
    • Task owners

    1 hour

    1. Look through the list of new and outstanding planned actions in the “Action Plan” tab of the IT Metrics Library, review progress, and prioritize outstanding items.
    2. Compare the list that needs remediation with the rank in the data entry tab.
    3. Adjust the priority of the outstanding and new actions to reflect the business needs.

    Step 3.2

    Review suggested actions

    Activities

    3.2.1 Review suggested actions in the IT Metrics Library

    Create the Action Plan

    Step 3.1 – Prioritize low-performing indicators

    Step 3.2 – Review suggested actions

    Step 3.3 – Develop the action plan

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    Reviewing the suggested actions in the IT Metrics Library

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Senior IT leadership
    • Process area owners
    • Metrics program owners and administrators

    Outcomes of this step

    An idea of possible suggested actions

    Take Action

    Knowing where you are underperforming is only half the battle. You need to act!

    • So far you have identified which indicators will tell you whether or not your team is performing and which indicators are most critical to your business success.
    • Knowing is the first step, but things will not improve without some kind of action.
    • Sometimes the action needed to course-correct is small and simple, but sometimes it is complicated and may take a long time.
    • Utilize the diverse ideas of your team to find solutions to underperforming indicators.
    • If you don’t have a viable simple solution, leverage the IT Metrics Library, which suggests high-level action needed to improve each indicator. If you need additional information, use your Info-Tech membership to review the recommended research.

    3.2.1 Review suggested actions in the IT Metrics Library

    Input

    • IT Metrics Library

    Output

    • Suggested actions

    Materials

    • IT Metrics Library

    Participants

    • Process area owners
    • Metrics program owners and administrators
    • Task owners

    0.5 hours

    1. For each of your low-performing indicators, review the suggested action and related research in the IT Metrics Library.

    Step 3.3

    Develop the action plan

    Activities

    3.3.1 Document planned actions

    3.3.2 Assign ownership of actions

    3.3.3 Determine timeline of actions

    3.3.4 Review past action status

    Create the action plan

    Step 3.1 – Prioritize low- performing indicators

    Step 3.2 – Review suggested actions

    Step 3.3 – Develop the action plan

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    Using the action plan tool to document the expected actions for low-performing indicators

    Assigning an owner and expected due date for the action

    Reviewing past action status for accountability

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Senior IT leadership
    • Process area owners
    • Metrics program owners and administrators

    Outcomes of this step

    An action plan to invoke improved performance

    3.3.1 Document planned actions

    Input

    • IT Metrics Library

    Output

    • Planned actions

    Materials

    • IT Metrics Library

    Participants

    • Process area owners
    • Metrics program owners and administrators
    • Task owners

    1 hour

    1. Decide on the action you plan to take to bring the indicator in line with expected performance and document the planned action in the “Action Plan” tab of the IT Metrics Library.

    Info-Tech Insight

    For larger initiatives try to break the task down to what is likely manageable before the next review. Seeing progress can motivate continued action.

    3.3.2 Assign ownership of actions

    Input

    • IT Metrics Library

    Output

    • Identified owners for each action

    Materials

    • IT Metrics Library

    Participants

    • Process area owners
    • Metrics program owners and administrators
    • Task owners

    0.5 hours

    1. For each unassigned task, assign clear ownership for completion of the task.
    2. The task owner should be the person accountable for the task.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Assigning clear ownership can promote accountability for progress.

    3.3.3 Determine timeline of actions

    Input

    • IT Metrics Library

    Output

    • Expected timeline for each action

    Materials

    • IT Metrics Library

    Participants

    • Process area owners
    • Metrics program owners and administrators
    • Task owners

    0.5 hours

    1. For each task, agree on an estimated target date for completion.

    Info-Tech Insight

    If the target completion date is too far in the future, break the task into manageable chunks.

    3.3.4 Review past action status

    Input

    • IT Metrics Library

    Output

    • Complete action plan for increased performance

    Materials

    • IT Metrics Library

    Participants

    • Process area owners
    • Metrics program owners and administrators
    • Task owners

    0.5 hours

    1. For each task, review the progress since last review.
    2. If desired progress is not being made, adjust your plan based on your organizational constraints.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Seek to understand the reasons that tasks are not being completed and problem solve for creative solutions to improve performance.

    Measure the value of your KPI program

    KPIs only produce value if they lead to action

    • Tracking the performance of key indicators is the first step, but value only comes from taking action based on this information.
    • Keep track of the number of action items that come out of your KPI review and how many are completed.
    • If possible, keep track of the time or money saved through completing the action items.

    Keeping track of the number of actions identified and completed is a low overhead measure.

    Tracking time or money saved is higher overhead but also higher value.

    The image is a chart titled KPI benefits. It includes a legend indicating that blue bars are for Actions identified, purple bars are for Actions completed, and the yellow line is for Time/money saved. The graph shows Q1-Q4, indicating an increase in all areas across the quarters.

    Establish Baseline Metrics

    Baseline metrics will be improved through:

    1. Identifying actions needed to remediate poor-performing KPIs
    2. Associating time and/or money savings as a result of actions taken
    Metric Current Goal
    Number of actions identified per month as a result of KPI review 0 TBD
    $ saved through actions taken due to KPI review 0 TBD
    Time saved through actions taken due to KPI review 0 TBD

    Summary of Accomplishment

    Problem Solved

    Through this project we have identified typical key performance indicators that are important to your organization’s effective management of IT.

    You’ve populated the IT Management Dashboard as a simple method to display the results of your selected KPIs.

    You’ve also established a regular review process for your KPIs and have a method to track the actions that are needed to improve performance as a result of the KPI review. This should allow you to hold individuals accountable for improvement efforts.

    You can also measure the effectiveness of your KPI program by tracking how many actions are identified as a result of the review. Ideally you can also track the money and time savings.

    If you would like additional support, have our analysts guide you through other phases as part of an Info-Tech workshop.

    Contact your account representative for more information.

    workshops@infotech.com

    1-888-670-8889

    Additional Support

    If you would like additional support, have our analysts guide you through other phases as part of an Info-Tech Workshop.

    Contact your account representative for more information.

    workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8889

    To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech Workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.

    Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech’s historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    Select the KPIs for your organization

    Examine the benefits of the KPIs suggested in the IT Metrics Library and help selecting those that will drive performance for your maturity level.

    Build an action plan

    Discuss options for identifying and executing actions that result from your KPI review. Determine how to set up the discipline needed to make the most of your KPI review program.

    Research Contributors and Experts

    Valence Howden

    Principal Research Director, CIO – Service Management Info-Tech Research Group

    • Valence has extensive experience in helping organizations be successful through optimizing how they govern themselves, how they design and execute strategies, and how they drive service excellence in all work.

    Tracy-Lynn Reid

    Practice Lead, CIO – People & Leadership Info-Tech Research Group

    • Tracy-Lynn covers key topics related to People & Leadership within an information technology context.

    Fred Chagnon

    Practice Lead, Infrastructure & Operations Info-Tech Research Group

    • Fred brings extensive practical experience in all aspects of enterprise IT Infrastructure, including IP networks, server hardware, operating systems, storage, databases, middleware, virtualization and security.

    Aaron Shum

    Practice Lead, Security, Risk & Compliance Info-Tech Research Group

    • With 20+ years of experience across IT, InfoSec, and Data Privacy, Aaron currently specializes in helping organizations implement comprehensive information security and cybersecurity programs as well as comply with data privacy regulations.

    Cole Cioran

    Practice Lead, Applications and Agile Development Info-Tech Research Group

    • Over the past twenty-five years, Cole has developed software; designed data, infrastructure, and software solutions; defined systems and enterprise architectures; delivered enterprise-wide programs; and managed software development, infrastructure, and business systems analysis practices.

    Barry Cousins

    Practice Lead, Applications – Project and Portfolio Mgmt. Info-Tech Research Group

    • Barry specializes in Project Portfolio Management, Help/Service Desk, and Telephony/Unified Communications. He brings an extensive background in technology, IT management, and business leadership.

    Jack Hakimian

    Vice President, Applications Info-Tech Research Group

    • Jack has close to 25 years of Technology and Management Consulting experience. He has served multi-billion-dollar organizations in multiple industries, including Financial Services and Telecommunications. Jack also served several large public sector institutions.

    Vivek Mehta

    Research Director, CIO Info-Tech Research Group

    • Vivek publishes on topics related to digital transformation and innovation. He is the author of research on Design a Customer-Centric Digital Operating Model and Create Your Digital Strategy as well as numerous keynotes and articles on digital transformation.

    Carlos Sanchez

    Practice Lead, Enterprise Applications Info-Tech Research Group

    • Carlos has a breadth of knowledge in enterprise applications strategy, planning, and execution.

    Andy Neill

    Practice Lead, Enterprise Architecture, Data & BI Info-Tech Research Group

    • Andy has extensive experience in managing technical teams, information architecture, data modeling, and enterprise data strategy.

    Michael Fahey

    Executive Counselor Info-Tech Research Group

    • As an Executive Counselor, Mike applies his decades of business experience and leadership, along with Info-Tech Research Group’s resources, to assist CIOs in delivering outstanding business results.

    Related Info-Tech Research

    Develop Meaningful Service Metrics to Ensure Business and User Satisfaction

    • Reinforce service orientation in your IT organization by ensuring your IT metrics generate value-driven resource behavior.

    Use Applications Metrics That Matter

    • It all starts with quality and customer satisfaction.

    Take Control of Infrastructure Metrics

    • Master the metrics maze to help make decisions, manage costs, and plan for change.

    Bibliography

    Bach, Nancy. “How Often Should You Measure Your Organization's KPIs?” EON, 26 June 2018. Accessed Jan. 2020.

    “The Benefits of Tracking KPIs – Both Individually and for a Team.” Hoopla, 30 Jan. 2017. Accessed Jan. 2020.

    Chepul, Tiffany. “Top 22 KPI Examples for Technology Companies.” Rhythm Systems, Jan. 2020. Accessed Jan. 2020.

    Cooper, Larry. “CSF's, KPI's, Metrics, Outcomes and Benefits” itSM Solutions. 5 Feb. 2010. Accessed Jan 2020.

    “CUC Report on the implementation of Key Performance Indicators: case study experience.” Committee of University Chairs, June 2008. Accessed Jan 2020.

    Harris, Michael, and Bill Tayler. “Don’t Let Metrics Undermine Your Business.” HBR, Sep.–Oct 2019. Accessed Jan. 2020.

    Hatari, Tim. “The Importance of a Strong KPI Dashboard.” TMD Coaching. 27 Dec. 2018. Accessed Jan. 2020.

    Roy, Mayu, and Marian Carter. “The Right KPIs, Metrics for High-performing, Cost-saving Space Management.” CFI, 2013. Accessed Jan 2020.

    Schrage, Michael, and David Kiron. “Leading With Next-Generation Key Performance Indicators.” MIT Sloan Management Review, 26 June 2018. Accessed Jan. 2020.

    Setijono, Djoko, and Jens J. Dahlgaard. “Customer value as a key performance indicator (KPI) and a key improvement indicator (KII)” Emerald Insight, 5 June 2007. Accessed Jan 2020.

    Skinner, Ted. “Balanced Scorecard KPI Examples: Comprehensive List of 183 KPI Examples for a Balanced Scorecard KPI Dashboard (Updated for 2020).” Rhythm Systems, Jan. 2020. Accessed Jan 2020.

    Wishart, Jessica. “5 Reasons Why You Need The Right KPIs in 2020” Rhythm Systems, 1 Feb. 2020. Accessed Jan. 2020.

    Build a Continual Improvement Program

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}463|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Operations Management
    • Parent Category Link: /i-and-o-process-management
    • IT managers must work hard to maintain and improve service quality or risk performance deterioration over time.
    • Leadership may feel lost about what to do next and which initiatives have higher priority for improvement.
    • The backlog of improvement initiatives makes the work even harder. Managers should involve the right people in the process and build a team that is responsible to monitor, measure, prioritize, implement, and test improvements.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Without continual improvement, sustained service quality will be temporary. Organizations need to put in place an ongoing process to detect potential services, enhance their procedures, and sustain their performance, whatever the process maturity is.

    Impact and Result

    • Set strategic vision for the continual improvement program.
    • Build a team to set regulations, processes, and audits for the program.
    • Set measurable targets for the program.
    • Identify and prioritize improvement initiatives.
    • Measure and monitor progress to ensure initiatives achieve the desired outcome.
    • Apply lessons learned to the next initiatives.

    Build a Continual Improvement Program Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Build a Continual Improvement Program – A step-by-step document to walk you through building a plan for efficient IT continual improvement.

    This storyboard will help you craft a continual improvement register and a workflow to ensure sustained service improvements that fulfill ongoing increases in stakeholder expectations.

    • Build a Continual Improvement Program Storyboard

    2. Continual Improvement Register and Workflow – Structured documents to help you outline improvement initiatives, prioritize them, and build a dashboard to streamline tracking.

    Use the Continual Improvement Register and Continual Improvement Workflow to help you brainstorm improvement items, get a better visibility into the items, and plan to execute improvements.

    • Continual Improvement Register
    • Continual Improvement Workflow (Visio)
    • Continual Improvement Workflow (PDF)
    [infographic]

    Further reading

    Build a Continual Improvement Program

    Don’t stop with process standardization; plan to continually improve and help those improvements stick.

    Analyst Perspective

    Go beyond standardizing basics

    IT managers often learn how to standardize IT services. Where they usually fail is in keeping these improvements sustainable. It’s one thing to build a quality process, but it’s another challenge entirely to keep momentum and know what to do next.

    To fill the gap, build a continual improvement plan to continuously increase value for stakeholders. This plan will help connect services, products, and practices with changing business needs.

    Without a continual improvement plan, managers may find themselves lost and wonder what’s next. This will lead to misalignment between ongoing and increasingly high stakeholder expectations and your ability to fulfill these requirements.

    Build a continual improvement program to engage executives, leaders, and subject matter experts (SMEs) to go beyond break fixes, enable proactive enhancements, and sustain process changes.

    Photo of Mahmoud Ramin, Ph.D., Senior Research Analyst, Infrastructure and Operations, Info-Tech Research Group. Mahmoud Ramin, Ph.D.
    Senior Research Analyst
    Infrastructure and Operations
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    • Even high-quality services and products need to be aligned with rising stakeholder expectations to sustain operational excellence.
    • Without the right leadership, commitment, and processes, improvements in service quality can be difficult to sustain.
    • Continual improvement is not only a development plan but also an organizational culture shift, which makes stakeholder buy-in even challenging.

    Common Obstacles

    • IT managers must work hard to maintain and improve service quality or risk performance deterioration over time.
    • Leadership feels lost about what to do next and which initiatives have higher priority for improvement.
    • A backlog of improvement initiatives makes the work even harder. Managers should involve the right people in the process and build a team that is responsible for monitoring, measuring, prioritizing, implementing, and testing improvements.

    Info-Tech’s Approach

    • Set a strategic vision for the continual improvement program.
    • Build a team to set regulations, processes, and audits for the program.
    • Set measurable targets for the program.
    • Identify and prioritize improvement initiatives.
    • Measure and monitor progress to ensure initiatives achieve the desired outcome.
    • Apply lessons learned to the next initiatives.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Without continual improvement, any process maturity achieved around service quality will not be sustained. Organizations need to put in place an ongoing program to maintain their current maturity and continue to grow and improve by identifying new services and enhancing existing processes.

    Purpose of continual improvement

    There should be alignment between ongoing improvements of business products and services and management of these products and services. Continual improvement helps service providers adapt to changing environments. No matter how critical the service is to the business, failure to continually improve reduces the service value.

    Image of a notebook with an illustration titled 'Continuous Improvement'.

    Continual improvement is one of the five elements of ITIL’s Service Value System (SVS).

    Continual improvement should be documented in an improvement register to record and manage improvement initiatives.

    Continual improvement is a proactive approach to service management. It involves measuring the effectiveness and efficiency of people, processes, and technology to:

    • Identify areas for improvement.
    • Adapt to changes in the business environment.
    • Align the IT strategy to organizational goals.

    A continual improvement process helps service management move away from a reactive approach that focuses only on fixing problems as they occur.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Make sure the basics are in place before you embark on a continual improvement initiative.

    Benefits of embedding a cross-organizational continual improvement approach

    Icon of a computer screen. Encourage end users to provide feedback on service quality. Icon of a crossed pencil and wrench.

    Provide an opportunity to stakeholders to define requirements and raise their concerns.

    Icon of a storefront.

    Embed continual improvement in all service delivery procedures.

    Icon of chevrons moving backward.

    Turn failures into improvement opportunities rather than contributing to a blame culture.

    Icon of a telescope.

    Improve practice effectiveness that enhances IT efficiency.

    Icon of a thumbs up in a speech bubble.

    Improve end-user satisfaction that positively impacts brand reputation.

    Icon of shopping bags.

    Improve operational costs while maintaining a high level of satisfaction.

    Icon of a magnifying glass over a map marker.

    Help the business become more proactive by identifying and improving services.

    Info-Tech Insight

    It’s the responsibility of the organization’s leaders to develop and promote a continual improvement culture. Work with the business unit leads and communicate the benefits of continual improvement to get their buy-in for the practice and achieve the long-term impact.

    Build a feedback program to get input into where improvement initiatives are needed

    A well-maintained continual improvement process creates a proper feedback mechanism for the following stakeholder groups:
    • Users
    • Suppliers
    • Service delivery team members
    • Service owners
    • Sponsors
    An efficient feedback mechanism should be constructed around the following initiatives:
    Target with an arrow in the bullseye. The arrow has four flags: 'Perceived value by users', 'Service effectiveness', 'Service governance', and 'Service demand'.
    Stakeholders who participate in feedback activities should feel comfortable providing suggestions for improvement.

    Work closely with the service desk team to build communication channels to conduct surveys. Avoid formal bureaucratic communications and enforce openness in communicating the value of feedback the stakeholders can provide.

    Info-Tech Insight

    When conducting feedback activities with users, keep surveys anonymous and ensure users’ information is kept confidential. Make sure everyone else is comfortable providing feedback in a constructive way so that you can seek clarification and create a feedback loop.

    Implement an iterative continual improvement model and ensure that your services align with your organizational vision

    Build a six-step process for your continual improvement plan. Make it a loop, in which each step becomes an input for the next step. A cycle around a dartboard with numbered steps: '01 Determine your goals', '02 Define the process team', '03 Determine initiatives', '04 Prioritize initiatives', '05 Execute improvement', '06 Establish a learning culture'.

    1. Determine your goals

    A vision statement communicates your desired future state of the IT organization.

    Your IT goals should always support your organizational goals. IT goals are high-level objectives that the IT organization needs to achieve to reach a target state.
    A cycle of the bolded statements on the right surrounding a dartboard with two bullseyes.

    Understand the high-level business objectives to set the vision for continual improvement in a way that will align IT strategies with business strategies.

    Obtaining a clear picture of your organization’s goals and overall corporate strategy is one of the crucial first steps to continual improvement and will set the stage for the metrics you select. Document your continual improvement program goals and objectives.

    Knowing what your business is doing and understanding the impact of IT on the business will help you ensure that any metrics you collect will be business focused.

    Understanding the long-term vision of the business and its appetite for commitment and sponsorship will also inform your IT strategy and continual improvement goals.

    Assess the future state

    At this stage, you need to visualize improvement, considering your critical success factors.

    Critical success factors (CSFs) are higher-level goals or requirements for success, such as improving end-user satisfaction. They’re factors that must be met in order to reach your IT and business strategic vision.

    Select key performance indicators (KPIs) that will identify useful information for the initiative: Define KPIs for each CSF. These will usually involve a trend, as an increase or decrease in something. If KPIs already exist for your IT processes, re-evaluate them to assess their relevance to current strategy and redefine if necessary. Selected KPIs should provide a full picture of the health of targeted practice.

    KPIs should cover these four vectors of practice performance:

    1. Quantity
      How many continual improvement initiatives are in progress
    2. Quality
      How well you implemented improvements
    3. Timeliness
      How long it took to get continual improvement initiatives done
    4. Compliance
      How well processes and controls are being executed, such as system availability
    Cross-section of a head split into sections with icons in the middle sections.

    Examples of key CSFs and KPIs for continual improvement

    CSF

    KPI

    Adopt and maintain an effective approach for continual improvement Improve stakeholder satisfaction due to implementation of improvement initiatives.
    Enhance stakeholder awareness about continual improvement plan and initiatives.
    Increase continual improvement adoption across the organization.
    Commit to effective continual improvement across the business Improve the return on investment.
    Increase the impact of the improvement initiatives on process maturity.
    Increase the rate of successful improvement initiatives.

    Prepare a vision statement to communicate the improvement strategy

    IT Implications + Business Context –› IT Goals
    • IT implications are derived from the business context and inform goals by aligning the IT goals with the business context.
    • Business context encompasses an understanding of the factors impacting the business from various perspectives, how the business makes decisions, and what it is trying to achieve.
    • IT goals are high-level, specific objectives that the IT organization needs to achieve to reach the target state. IT goals begin a process of framing what IT as an organization needs to be able to do in the target state.

    IT goals will help identify the target state, IT capabilities, and the initiatives that will need to be implemented to enable those capabilities.

    The vision statement is expressed in the present tense. It seeks to articulate the desired role of IT and how IT will be perceived.

    Strong IT vision statements have the following characteristics:
    Arrow pointing right. Describe a desired future
    Arrow pointing right. Focus on ends, not means
    Arrow pointing right. Communicate promise
    Arrow pointing right. Work as an elevator pitch:
    • Concise; no unnecessary words
    • Compelling
    • Achievable
    • Inspirational
    • Memorable

    2. Define the process team

    The structure of each continual improvement team depends on resource availability and competency levels.

    Make sure to allocate continual improvement activities to the available resources and assess the requirement to bring in others to fulfill all tasks.

    Brainstorm what steps should be included in a continual improvement program:

    • Who is responsible for identifying, logging, and prioritizing improvement opportunities?
    • Who makes the business case for improvement initiatives?
    • Who is the owner of the register, responsible for documenting initiatives and updating their status?
    • Who executes implementation?
    • Who evaluates implementation success?
    Match stakeholder skill sets with available resources to ensure continual improvement processes are handled properly. Brainstorm skills specific to the program:
    • Knowledge of provided products and services.
    • Good understanding of organization’s goals and objectives.
    • Efficiency in collecting and measuring metrics, understanding company standards and policies, and presenting them to impacted stakeholders.
    • Competency in strategic thinking and aligning the organization’s goals with improvement initiatives.

    Enable the continual improvement program by clarifying responsibilities

    Determine roles and responsibilities to ensure accountability

    The continual improvement activities will only be successful if specific roles and responsibilities are clearly identified.

    Depending on available staff and resources, you may be able to have full-time continual improvement roles, or you may include continual improvement activities in individuals’ job descriptions.

    Each improvement action that you identify should have clear ownership and accountability to ensure that it is completed within the specified timeframe.

    Roles and responsibilities can be reassigned throughout the continual improvement process.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Create cross-functional teams to improve perspective and not focus on only one small group when trying to problem solve. Having other teams hear and reframe the issue or talk about how they can help to solve issues as a team can create bigger solutions that will help the entire IT team, not just one group.

    Consider assigning dedicated continual improvement roles

    Silhouette of a business person.
    CI Coordinator

    Continual improvement coordinators are responsible for moving projects to the implementation phase and monitoring all continual improvement roles.

    Silhouette of a business person.
    Business Owner

    Business owners are accountable for business governance, compliance, and ROI analysis. They are responsible for operational and monetary aspects of the business.

    Silhouette of a business person.
    IT Owner

    IT owners are responsible for developing the action plan and ensuring success of the initiatives. They are usually the subject matter experts, focusing on technical aspects.

    3. Determine improvement initiatives

    Businesses usually make the mistake of focusing too much on making existing processes better while missing gaps in their practices.

    Gather stakeholder feedback to help you evaluate the maturity levels of IT practices Sample of the End User Satisfaction Survey.

    You need to understand the current state of service operations to understand how you can provide value through continual improvement. Give everyone an opportunity to provide feedback on IT services.

    Use Info-Tech’s End User Satisfaction Survey to define the state of your core IT services.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Become proactive to improve satisfaction. Continual improvement is not only about identifying pain points and improving them. It enables you to proactively identify initiatives for further service improvement using both practice functionality and technology enablement.

    Understand the current state of your IT practices

    Determine the maturity level of your IT areas to help you understand which processes need improvement. Involve the practice team in maturity assessment activities to get ideas and input from them. This will also help you get their buy-in and engagement for improvement.

    Leverage performance metrics to analyze performance level. Metrics play a key role in understanding what needs improvement. After you implement metrics, have an impact report regularly generated to monitor them.

    Use problem management to identify root causes for the identified gaps. Potential sources of problems can be:

    • Recurring issues that may be an indicator of an underlying problem.
    • Business processes or service issues that are not IT related, such as inefficient business process or service design issues.

    Establish an improvement roadmap and execute initiatives

    Build a continual improvement register (CIR) for your target initiatives

    A CIR is a document used for recording your action plan from the beginning to the end of the improvement project.

    If you just sit and plan for improvements without acting on them, nothing will improve. CIR helps you create an action plan and allows you to manage, track, and prioritize improvement suggestions.

    Consider tracking the following information in your CIR, adjusted to meet the needs of your organization:

    Information

    Description

    Business value impact Identify approved themes or goals that each initiative should apply to. These can and should change over time based on changing business needs.
    Effort/cost Identify the expected effort or cost the improvement initiative will require.
    Priority How urgent is the improvement? Categorize based on effort, cost, and risk levels.
    Status Ensure each initiative has a status assigned that reflects its current state.
    Timeline List the timeframe to start the improvement initiative based on the priority level.
    CI functional groups Customize the functional groups in your CI program

    Populate your register with ideas that come from your first round of assessments and use this document to continually add and track new ideas as they emerge.

    You can also consider using the register to track the outcomes and benefits of improvement initiatives after they have been completed.

    Activity: Use the Continual Improvement Register template to brainstorm responsibilities, generate improvement initiatives, and action plan

    1-3 hours
    1. Open the Continual Improvement Register template and navigate to tab 2, Setup.
    2. Brainstorm your definitions for the following items to get a clear understanding of these items when completing the CIR. The more quantification you apply to the criteria, the more tangible evaluation you will do:
      • Business value impact categories
      • Effort/cost
      • Priority
      • Status
      • Timeline
    3. Discuss the teams that the upcoming initiatives will belong to and update them under CI Functional Groups.
    1. Analyze the assessment data collected throughout stakeholder feedback and your current-state evaluation.
    2. Use this data to generate a list of initiatives that should be undertaken to improve the performance of the targeted processes.
    3. Use sticky notes to record identified CI initiatives.
    4. Record each initiative in tab 3, CI Register, along with associated information:
      • A unique ID number for the initiative
      • The individual who submitted the idea
      • The team the initiative belongs to
      • A description of the initiative

    Download the Continual Improvement Register template

    Activity: Use the Continual Improvement Register template to brainstorm responsibilities, generate improvement initiatives, and action plan

    Input

    • List of key stakeholders for continual improvement
    • Current state of services and processes

    Output

    • Continual improvement register setup
    • List of initiatives for continual improvement

    Materials

    • Continual improvement register
    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • Markers
    • Laptops

    Participant

    • CIO
    • IT managers
    • Project managers
    • Continual improvement manager/coordinator

    4. Prioritize initiatives

    Prioritization should be transparent and available to stakeholders.

    Some initiatives are more critical than others to achieve and should be prioritized accordingly. Some improvements require large investments and need an equally large effort, while some are relatively low-cost, low-effort improvements. Focus on low-hanging fruit and prioritize low-cost, low-effort improvements to help the organization with rapid growth. This will also help you get stakeholder buy-in for the rest of your continual improvement program.

    Prioritize improvement initiatives in your CIR to increase visibility and ensure larger improvement initiatives are done the next cycle. As one improvement cycle ends, the next cycle begins, which allows the continual improvement team to keep pace with changing business requirements.

    Stock image of a person on a ladder leaning against a bookshelf.

    Identify “quick wins” that can provide immediate improvement

    Prioritize these quick wins to immediately demonstrate the success of the continual service improvement effort to the business.

    01

    Keep the scope of the continual improvement process manageable at the beginning by focusing on a few key areas that you want to improve.
    • If you have identified pain points, addressing these will demonstrate the value of the project to the business to gain their support.
    • Choose the services or processes that continue to disrupt or threaten service – focus on where pain points are evident and where there is a need for improvement.
    • Critical services to improve should emerge from the current-state assessments.

    02

    From your list of proposed improvements, focus on a few of the top pain points and plan to address those.

    03

    Choose the right services to improve at the first stage of continual improvement to ensure that the continual improvement process delivers value to the business.

    Activity: Prioritize improvement initiatives

    2-3 hours

    Input: List of initiatives for continual improvement

    Output: Prioritized list of initiatives

    Materials: Continual improvement register, Whiteboard/flip charts, Markers, Laptops

    Participants: CIO, IT managers, Project managers, Continual improvement manager

    1. In the CI Register tab of the Continual Improvement Register template, define the status, priority, effort/cost, and timeline according to the definition of each in the data entry tab.
    2. Review improvement initiatives from the previous activity.
    3. Record the CI coordinator, business owner, and IT owner for each initiative.
    4. Fill out submission date to track when the initiative was added to the register.
    5. According to the updated items, you will get a dashboard of items based on their categories, effort, priority, status, and timeline. You will also get a visibility into the total number of improvement initiatives.
    6. Focus on the short-term initiatives that are higher priority and require less effort.
    7. Refer to the Continual Improvement Workflow template and update the steps.

    Download the Continual Improvement Register template

    Download the Continual Improvement Workflow template

    5. Execute improvement

    Develop a plan for improvement

    Determine how you want to reach your improvement objectives. Define how to make processes work better.
    Icons representing steps. Descriptions below.
    Make a business case for your action plan Determine budget for implementing the improvement and move to execution. Find out how long it takes to build the improvement in the practice. Confirm the resources and skill sets you require for the improvement. Communicate the improvement plan across the business for better visibility and for seamless organizational change management, if needed. Lean into incremental improvements to ensure practice quality is sustained, not temporary. Put in place an ongoing process to audit, enhance, and sustain the performance of the target practice.

    Create a specific action plan to guide your improvement activities

    As part of the continual improvement plan, identify specific actions to be completed, along with ownership for each action.

    The continual improvement process must:

    • Define activities to be completed.
    • Create roles and assign ownership to complete activities.
    • Provide training and awareness about the initiative.
    • Define inputs and outputs.
    • Include reporting.

    For each action, identify:

    • The problem.
    • Who will be responsible and accountable.
    • Metric(s) for assessment.
    • Baseline and target metrics.
    • Action to be taken to achieve improvement (training, new templates, etc.).

    Choose timelines:

    • Firm timelines are important to keep the project on track.
    • One to two months for an initiative is an ideal length of time to maintain interest and enthusiasm for the specific project and achieve a result.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Every organization is unique in terms of its services, processes, strengths, weaknesses, and needs, as well as the expectations of its end users. There is no single action plan that will work for everyone. The improvement plan will vary from organization to organization, but the key elements of the plan (i.e. specific priorities, timelines, targets, and responsibilities) should always be in place.

    Build a communication plan to ensure the implementation of continual improvement stakeholder buy-in

    1. Throughout the improvement process, share information about both the status of the project and the impact of the improvement initiatives.
    Icon of a group of people. Encourage a collaborative environment across all members of the practice team.
    Icon of an ascending graph. Motivate every individual to continue moving upward and taking ownership over their roles.
    Icon of overlapping speech bubbles. Communication among team members ensures that everyone is on the same page working together toward a common goal.
    Icon of a handshake. The most important thing is to get the support of your team. Unless you have their support, you won’t be able to deliver any of the solutions you draw up.
    2. The end users should be kept in the loop so they can feel that their contribution is valued.
    Icon of an arrow pointing right. When improvements happen and only a small group of people are involved in the results and action plan, misconceptions will arise.
    Icon of a thumbs up in a speech bubble. If communication is lacking, end users will provide less feedback on the practice improvements.
    Icon of a cone made of stacked layers. For end users to feel their concerns are being considered, you must communicate the findings in a way that conveys the impact of their contribution.

    Info-Tech Insight

    To be effective, continual improvement requires open and honest feedback from IT staff. Debriefings work well for capturing information about lessons learned. Break down the debriefings into smaller, individual activities completed within each phase of the project to better capture the large amount of data and lessons learned within that phase.

    Measure the success of your improvement program

    Continual improvement is everybody’s job within the organization.

    Determine how improvements impacted stakeholders. Build a relationship pyramid to analyze how improvements impacted external users and narrow down to the internal users, implementing team, and leaders.
    1. How did we make improvements with our partners and suppliers? –› Look into your contracts and measure the SLAs and commitments.
    2. How could improvement initiatives impact the organization? –› Involve everybody to provide feedback. Rerun the end-user satisfaction survey and compare with the baseline that you obtained before improvement implementation.
    3. How does the improvement team feel about the whole process? –› What were the lessons learned, and can the team apply the lessons in the next improvement initiatives?
    4. How did the leaders manage and lead improvements? –› Were they able to provide proper vision to guide the improvement team through the process?
    A relationship pyramid with the initial questions on the left starting from '1' at the bottom to '4' at the 2nd highest level.

    Measure changes in selected metrics to evaluate success

    Measuring and reporting are key components in the improvement process.

    Adjust improvement priority based on updated objectives. Justify the reason. Refer to your CIR to document it.

    Did you get there?

    Part of the measurement should include a review of CSFs and KPIs determined in step 1 (assess the future state). Some may need to be replaced.

    • After an improvement has been implemented, it is important to regularly monitor and evaluate the CSFs and KPIs you chose and run reports to evaluate whether the implemented improvement has actually resolved the service/process issues or helped you achieve your objectives.
    • Establish a schedule for regularly reviewing key metrics that were identified in Step 1 and assessing change in those metrics and progress toward reaching objectives.
    • In addition to reviewing CSFs, KPIs, and metrics, check in with the IT organization and end users to measure their perceptions of the change once an appropriate amount of time has passed.
    • Ensure that metrics are telling the whole story and that reporting is honest in order to be informative.
    Outcomes of the continual improvement process should include:
    • Improved efficiency, effectiveness, and quality of processes and services.
    • Processes and services more aligned with the business needs and strategy.
    • Maturity of processes and services.

    For a guideline to determine a list of metrics, refer to Info-Tech’s blueprints:

    Info-Tech Insight

    Make sure you’re measuring the right things and considering all sources of information. Don’t rely on a single or very few metrics. Instead, consider a group of metrics to help you get a better holistic view of improvement initiatives and their impact on IT operations.

    6. Establish a learning culture and apply it to other practices

    Reflect on lessons learned to drive change forward

    What did you learn?
    Icon of a checklist and pencil. Ultimately, continual improvement is an ongoing educational program.
    Icon of a brain with a lighting bolt.
    Icon of a wrench in a speech bubble. By teaching your team how to learn better and identify sources of new knowledge that can be applied going forward, you maximize the efficacy of your team and improvement plan effort.
    What obstacles prevented you from reaching your target condition?
    Icon of a map marker. If you did not reach your target goals, reflect as a team on what obstacles prevented you from reaching that target.
    Icon of a wrench in a gear. Focus on the obstacles that are preventing your team from reaching the target state.
    Icon of a sun behind clouds. As obstacles are removed, new ones will appear, and old ones will disappear.

    Compare expectations versus reality

    Compare the EC (expected change) to the AC (actual change)
    Arrow pointing down.
    Arrow pointing left and down labelled 'Small'. Evaluate the differences: how large is the difference from what you expected? Arrow pointing right and down labelled 'Large'.
    Things are on track and the issue could have simply been an issue with timing of the improvement. More reflection is needed. Perhaps it is a gap in understanding the goal or a poor execution of the action plan.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Regardless of the cause, large differences between the EC and the AC provide great learning opportunities about how to approach change in the future.

    A cycle around a dartboard with numbered steps: '01 Determine your goals', '02 Define the process team', '03 Determine initiatives', '04 Prioritize initiatives', '05 Execute improvement', '06 Establish a learning culture'.

    Think long-term to sustain changes

    The continual improvement process is ongoing. When one improvement cycle ends, the next should begin in order to continually measure and evaluate processes.

    The goal of any framework is steady and continual improvement over time that resets the baseline to the current (and hopefully improved) level at the end of each cycle.

    Have processes in place to ensure that the improvements made will remain in place after the change is implemented. Each completed cycle is just another step toward your target state.
    Icon of a group of people. Ensure that there is a continual commitment from management.
    Icon of a bar chart. Regularly monitor metrics as well as stakeholder feedback after the initial improvement period has ended. Use this information to plan the next improvement.
    Icon of gears. Continual improvement is a combination of attitudes, behavior, and culture.

    Related Info-Tech Research

    Sample of 'Build a Business-Aligned IT Strategy'. Build a Business-Aligned IT Strategy

    Success depends on IT initiatives clearly aligned to business goals, IT excellence, and driving technology innovation.

    Sample of 'Develop Meaningful Service Metrics'. Develop Meaningful Service Metrics

    Reinforce service orientation in your IT organization by ensuring your IT metrics generate value-driven resource behavior.

    Sample of 'Common Challenges to incident management success'. Improve Incident and Problem Management

    Rise above firefighter mode with structured incident management to enable effective problem management.

    Works Cited

    “Continual Improvement ITIL4 Practice Guide.” AXELOS, 2020. Accessed August 2022.

    “5 Tips for Adopting ITIL 4’s Continual Improvement Management Practice.” SysAid, 2021. Accessed August 2022.

    Jacob Gillingham. “ITIL Continual Service Improvement And 7-Step Improvement Process” Invensis Global Learning Services, 2022. Accessed August 2022.

    Determine the Future of Microsoft Project in Your Organization

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}357|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 10.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $125,999 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 50 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Project Management Office
    • Parent Category Link: /project-management-office
    • You use Microsoft tools to manage your work, projects, and/or project portfolio.
    • Its latest offering, Project for the web, is new and you’re not sure what to make of it. Microsoft says it will soon replace Microsoft Project and Project Online, but the new software doesn’t seem to do what the old software did.
    • The organization has adopted M365 for collaboration and work management. Meetings happen on Teams, projects are scoped a bit with Planner, and the operations group uses Azure Boards to keep track of what they need to get done.
    • Despite your reservations about the new project management software, Microsoft software has become even more ubiquitous.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • The various MS Project offerings (but most notably the latest, Project for the web) hold the promise of integrating with the rest of M365 into a unified work management solution. However, out of the box, Project for the web and the various platforms within M365 are all disparate utilities that need to be pieced together in a purpose-built manner to make use of them for holistic work management purposes. If you’re looking for a cohesive product out of the box, look elsewhere. If you’re looking to assemble a wide array of work, project, and portfolio management functions across different functions and departments, you may have found what you seek.
    • Rather than choosing tools based on your gaps, assess your current maturity level so that you optimize your investment in the Microsoft landscape.

    Impact and Result

    Follow Info-Tech’s path in this blueprint to:

    • Perform a tool audit to trim your work management tool landscape.
    • Navigate the MS Project and M365 licensing landscape.
    • Make sense of what to do with Project for the web and take the right approach to rolling it out (i.e. DIY or MS Gold Partner driven) based upon your needs.
    • Create an action plan to inform next steps.

    After following the program in this blueprint, you will be prepared to advise the organization on how to best leverage the rapidly shifting work management options within M365 and the place of MS Project within it.

    Determine the Future of Microsoft Project in Your Organization Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should make sense of the MS Project and M365 landscapes, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Determine your tool needs

    Assess your work management tool landscape, current state maturity, and licensing needs to inform a purpose-built work management action plan.

    • M365 Task Management Tool Guide
    • M365 Project Management Tool Guide
    • M365 Project Portfolio Management Tool Guide
    • Tool Audit Workbook
    • Force Field Analysis Tool
    • Microsoft Project & M365 Licensing Tool
    • Project Portfolio Management Maturity Assessment Workbook (With Tool Analysis)
    • Project Management Maturity Assessment Workbook (With Tool Analysis)

    2. Weigh your MS Project implementation options

    Get familiar with Project for the web’s extensibility as well as the MS Gold Partner ecosystem as you contemplate the best implementation approach(s) for your organization.

    • None
    • None

    3. Finalize your implementation approach

    Prepare a boardroom-ready presentation that will help you communicate your MS Project and M365 action plan to PMO and organizational stakeholders.

    • Microsoft Project & M365 Action Plan Template

    Infographic

    Workshop: Determine the Future of Microsoft Project in Your Organization

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Assess Driving Forces and Risks

    The Purpose

    Assess the goals and needs as well as the risks and constraints of a work management optimization.

    Take stock of your organization’s current work management tool landscape.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Clear goals and alignment across workshop participants as well as an understanding of the risks and constraints that will need to be mitigated to succeed.

    Current-state insight into the organization’s work management tool landscape.

    Activities

    1.1 Review the business context.

    1.2 Explore the M365 work management landscape.

    1.3 Identify driving forces for change.

    1.4 Analyze potential risks.

    1.5 Perform current-state analysis on work management tools.

    Outputs

    Business context

    Current-state understanding of the task, project, and portfolio management options in M365 and how they align with the organization’s ways of working

    Goals and needs analysis

    Risks and constraints analysis

    Work management tool overview

    2 Determine Tool Needs and Process Maturity

    The Purpose

    Determine your organization’s work management tool needs as well as its current level of project management and project portfolio management process maturity.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    An understanding of your tooling needs and your current levels of process maturity.

    Activities

    2.1 Review tool audit dashboard and conduct the final audit.

    2.2 Identify current Microsoft licensing.

    2.3 Assess current-state maturity for project management.

    2.4 Define target state for project management.

    2.5 Assess current-state maturity for project portfolio management.

    2.6 Define target state for project portfolio management.

    Outputs

    Tool audit

    An understanding of licensing options and what’s needed to optimize MS Project options

    Project management current-state analysis

    Project management gap analysis

    Project portfolio management current-state analysis

    Project portfolio management gap analysis

    3 Weigh Your Implementation Options

    The Purpose

    Take stock of your implementation options for Microsoft old project tech and new project tech.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    An optimized implementation approach based upon your organization’s current state and needs.

    Activities

    3.1 Prepare a needs assessment for Microsoft 365 and Project Plan licenses.

    3.2 Review the business case for Microsoft licensing.

    3.3 Get familiar with Project for the web.

    3.4 Assess the MS Gold Partner Community.

    3.5 Conduct a feasibility test for PFTW.

    Outputs

    M365 and Project Plan needs assessment

    Business case for additional M365 and MS Project licensing

    An understand of Project for the web and how to extend it

    MS Gold Partner outreach plan

    A go/no-go decision for extending Project for the web on your own

    4 Finalize Implementation Approach

    The Purpose

    Determine the best implementation approach for your organization and prepare an action plan.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A purpose-built implementation approach to help communicate recommendations and needs to key stakeholders.

    Activities

    4.1 Decide on the implementation approach.

    4.2 Identify the audience for your proposal.

    4.3 Determine timeline and assign accountabilities.

    4.4 Develop executive summary presentation.

    Outputs

    An implementation plan

    Stakeholder analysis

    A communication plan

    Initial executive presentation

    5 Next Steps and Wrap-Up (offsite)

    The Purpose

    Finalize your M365 and MS Project work management recommendations and get ready to communicate them to key stakeholders.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Time saved in developing and communicating an action plan.

    Stakeholder buy-in.

    Activities

    5.1 Complete in-progress deliverables from previous four days.

    5.2 Set up review time for workshop deliverables and to discuss next steps.

    Outputs

    Finalized executive presentation

    A gameplan to communicate your recommendations to key stakeholders as well as a roadmap for future optimization

    Further reading

    Determine the Future of Microsoft Project in Your Organization

    View your task management, project management, and project portfolio management options through the lens of M365.

    EXECUTIVE BRIEF

    Analyst Perspective

    Microsoft Project is an enigma

    Microsoft Project has dominated its market since being introduced in the 1980s, yet the level of adoption and usage per license is incredibly low.

    The software is ubiquitous, mostly considered to represent its category for “Project Management.” Yet, the software is conflated with its “Portfolio Management” offerings as organizations make platform decisions with Microsoft Project as the incorrectly identified incumbent.

    And incredibly, Microsoft has dominated the next era of productivity software with the “365” offerings. Yet, it froze the “Project” family of offerings and introduced the not-yet-functional “Project for the web.”

    Having a difficult time understanding what to do with, and about, Microsoft Project? You’re hardly alone. It’s not simply a question of tolerating, embracing, or rejecting the product: many who choose a competitor find they’re still paying for Microsoft Project-related licensing for years to come.

    If you’re in the Microsoft 365 ecosystem, use this research to understand your rapidly shifting landscape of options.

    (Barry Cousins, Project Portfolio Management Practice Lead, Info-Tech Research Group)

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    You use Microsoft (MS) tools to manage your work, projects, and/or project portfolio.

    Their latest offering, Project for the web, is new and you’re not sure what to make of it. Microsoft says it will soon replace Microsoft Project and Project Online, but the new software doesn’t seem to do what the old software did.

    The organization has adopted M365 for collaboration and work management. Meetings happen on Teams, projects are scoped a bit with Planner, and the operations group uses Azure Boards to keep track of what they need to get done.

    Despite your reservations about the new project management software, Microsoft software has become even more ubiquitous.

    Common Obstacles

    M365 provides the basic components for managing tasks, projects, and project portfolios, but there is no instruction manual for making those parts work together.

    M365 isn’t the only set of tools at play. Business units and teams across the organization have procured other non-Microsoft tools for work management without involving IT.

    Microsoft’s latest project offering, Project for the web, is still evolving and you’re never sure if it is stable or ready for prime time. The missing function seems to involve the more sophisticated project planning disciplines, which are still important to larger, longer, and costlier projects.

    Common Obstacles

    Follow Info-Tech’s path in this blueprint to:

    • Perform a tool audit to trim your work management tool landscape.
    • Navigate the MS Project and M365 licensing landscape.
    • Make sense of what to do with Project for the web and take the right approach to rolling it out (i.e. DIY or MS Gold Partner driven) for your needs.
    • Create an action plan to inform next steps.

    After following the program in this blueprint, you will be prepared to advise the organization on how to best leverage the rapidly shifting work management options within M365 and the place of MS Project within it.

    M365 and, within it, O365 are taking over

    Accelerated partly by the pandemic and the move to remote work, Microsoft’s market share in the work productivity space has grown exponentially in the last two years.

    70% of Fortune 500 companies purchased 365 from Sept. 2019 to Sept. 2020. (Thexyz blog, 2020)

    In its FY21 Q2 report, Microsoft reported 47.5 million M365 consumer subscribers – an 11.2% increase from its FY20 Q4 reporting. (Office 365 for IT Pros, 2021)

    As of September 2020, there were 258,000,000 licensed O365 users. (Thexyz blog, 2020)

    In this blueprint, we’ll look at what the what the phenomenal growth of M365 means for PMOs and project portfolio practitioners who identify as Microsoft shops

    The market share of M365 warrants a fresh look at Microsoft’s suite of project offerings

    For many PMO and project portfolio practitioners, the footprint of M365 in their organizations’ work management cultures is forcing a renewed look at Microsoft’s suite of project offerings.

    The complicating factor is this renewed look comes at a transitional time in Microsoft’s suite of project and portfolio offerings.

    • The market dominance of MS Project Server and Project Online are wanning, with Microsoft promising the end-of-life for Online sometime in the coming years.
    • Project Online’s replacement, Project for the web, is a viable task management and lightweight project management tool, but its viability as a replacement for the rigor of Project Online is at present largely a question mark.
    • Related to the uncertainty and promise around Project for the web, the Dataverse and the Power Platform offer a glimpse into a democratized future of work management tools but anything specific about that future has yet to solidify.

    Microsoft Project has 66% market share in the project management tool space. (Celoxis, 2018)

    A copy of MS project is sold or licensed every 20 seconds. (Integent, 2013)

    MS Project is evolving to meet new work management realities

    It also evolved to not meet the old project management realities.

    • The lines between traditional project management and operational task management solutions are blurring as organizations struggle to keep up with demands.
    • To make the software easier to use, modern work management doesn’t involve the complexities from days past. You won’t find anywhere to introduce complex predecessor-successor relationships, unbalanced assignments with front-loading or back-loading, early-start/late-finish, critical path, etc.
    • “Work management” is among the latest buzzwords in IT consulting. With Project for the web (PFTW), Azure Boards, and Planner, Microsoft is attempting to compete with lighter and better-adopted tools like Trello, Basecamp, Asana, Wrike, and Monday.com.
    • Buyers of project and work management software have struggled to understand how PFTW will still be usable if it gets the missing project management function from MS Project.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Beware of the Software Granularity Paradox.

    Common opinion 1: “Plans and estimates that are granular enough to be believable are too detailed to manage and maintain.”

    Common opinion 2: “Plans simple enough to publish aren’t detailed enough to produce believable estimates.”

    In other words, software simple enough to get widely adopted doesn’t produce believable plans. Software that can produce believable plans is too complex to use at scale.

    A viable task and project management option must walk the line between these dichotomies.

    M365 gives you the pieces, but it’s on PMO users to piece them together in a viable way

    With the new MS Project and M365, it’s on PMOs to avoid the granularity paradox and produce a functioning solution that fits with the organization’s ways of working.

    Common perception still sees Microsoft Project as a rich software tool. Thus, when we consider the next generation of Microsoft Project, it’s easy to expect a newer and friendlier version of what we knew before.

    In truth, the new solution is a collection of partially integrated but largely disparate tools that each satisfy a portion of the market’s needs. While it looks like a rich collection of function when viewed through high-level requirements, users will find:

    • Overlaps, where multiple tools satisfy the same functional requirement (e.g. “assign a task”)
    • Gaps, where a tool doesn’t quite do enough and you’re forced to incorporate another tool (e.g. reverting back to Microsoft Project for advanced resource planning)
    • Islands, where tools don’t fluently talk to each other (e.g. Planner data integrated in real-time with portfolio data, which requires clunky, unstable, decentralized end-user integrations with Microsoft Power Automate)
    A colourful arrangement of Microsoft programs arranged around a pile of puzzle pieces.

    Info-Tech's approach

    Use our framework to best leverage the right MS Project offerings and M365 components for your organization’s work management needs.

    The Info-Tech difference:

    1. A simple to follow framework to help you make sense of a chaotic landscape.
    2. Practical and tactical tools that will help you save time.
    3. Leverage industry best practices and practitioner-based insights.
    An Info-Tech framework titled 'Determine the Future of Microsoft Project in Your Organization, subtitle 'View your task, project, and portfolio management options through the lens of Microsoft 365'. There are four main sections titled 'Background', 'Approaches', 'Deployments', and 'Portfolio Outcomes'. In '1) Background' are 'Analyze Content', 'Assess Constraints', and 'Determine Goals and Needs'. In '2) Approaches' are 'DIY: Are you ready to do it yourself?' 'Info-Tech: Can our analysts help?', and 'MS Gold Partner: Are you better off with a third party?'. In '3) Deployments' are five sections: 'Personal Task Management', Barriers to Portfolio Outcomes: Isolated to One Person. 'Team Task Management', Barriers to Portfolio Outcomes: Isolated to One Team. 'Project Portfolio Management', Barriers to Portfolio Outcomes: Isolated to One Project. 'Project Management', Barriers to Portfolio Outcomes: Functionally Incomplete. 'Enterprise Project and Portfolio Management', Barriers to Portfolio Outcomes: Underadopted. In '4) Portfolio Outcomes' are 'Informed Steering Committee', 'Increased Project Throughput', 'Improved Portfolio Responsiveness', 'Optimized Resource Utilization', and 'Reduced Monetary Waste'.

    Determine the Future of Microsoft Project in Your Organization

    View your task, project, and portfolio management options through the lens of Microsoft 365.

    1. Background

    • Analyze Content
    • Assess Constraints
    • Determine Goals and Needs

    2. Approaches

    • DIY – Are you ready to do it yourself?
    • Info-Tech – Can our analysts help?
    • MS Gold Partner – Are you better off with a third party?

    3. Deployments

      Task Management

    • Personal Task Management
      • Who does it? Knowledge workers
      • What is it? To-do lists
      • Common Approaches
        • Paper list and sticky notes
        • Light task tools
      • Applications
        • Planner
        • To Do
      • Level of Rigor 1/5
      • Barriers to Portfolio Outcomes: Isolated to One Person
    • Team Task Management
      • Who does it? Groups of knowledge workers
      • What is it? Collaborative to-do lists
      • Common Approaches
        • Kanban boards
        • Spreadsheets
        • Light task tools
      • Applications
        • Planner
        • Azure Boards
        • Teams
      • Level of Rigor 2/5
      • Barriers to Portfolio Outcomes: Isolated to One Team
    • Project Management

    • Project Portfolio Management
      • Who does it? PMO Directors, Portfolio Managers
      • What is it?
        • Centralized list of projects
        • Request and intake handling
        • Aggregating reporting
      • Common Approaches
        • Spreadsheets
        • PPM software
        • Roadmaps
      • Applications
        • Project for the Web
        • Power Platform
      • Level of Rigor 3/5
      • Barriers to Portfolio Outcomes: Isolated to One Project
    • Project Management
      • Who does it? Project Managers
      • What is it? Deterministic scheduling of related tasks
      • Common Approaches
        • Spreadsheets
        • Lists
        • PM software
        • PPM software
      • Applications
        • Project Desktop Client
      • Level of Rigor 4/5
      • Barriers to Portfolio Outcomes: Functionally Incomplete
    • Enterprise Project and Portfolio Management

    • Enterprise Project and Portfolio Management
      • Who does it? PMO and ePMO Directors, Portfolio Managers, Project Managers
      • What is it?
        • Centralized request and intake handling
        • Resource capacity management
        • Deterministic scheduling of related tasks
      • Common Approaches
        • PPM software
      • Applications
        • Project Online
        • Project Desktop Client
        • Project Server
      • Level of Rigor 5/5
      • Barriers to Portfolio Outcomes: Underadopted

    4. Portfolio Outcomes

    • Informed Steering Committee
    • Increased Project Throughput
    • Improved Portfolio Responsiveness
    • Optimized Resource Utilization
    • Reduced Monetary Waste

    Info-Tech's methodology for Determine the Future of MS Project for Your Organization

    1. Determine Your Tool Needs

    2. Weigh Your MS Project Implementation Options

    3. Finalize Your Implementation Approach

    Phase Steps

    1. Survey the M365 Work Management Tools
    2. Perform a Process Maturity Assessment to Help Inform Your M365 Starting Point
    3. Consider the Right MS Project Licenses for Your Stakeholders
    1. Get Familiar With Extending Project for the Web Using Power Apps
    2. Assess the MS Gold Partner Community
    1. Prepare an Action Plan

    Phase Outcomes

    1. Work Management Tool Audit
    2. MS Project and Power Platform Licensing Needs
    3. Project Management and Project Portfolio Management Maturity Assessment
    1. Project for the Web Readiness Assessment
    2. MS Gold Partner Outreach Plan
    1. MS Project and M365 Action Plan Presentation

    Insight Summary

    Overarching blueprint insight: Microsoft Parts Sold Separately. Assembly required.

    The various MS Project offerings (but most notably the latest, Project for the web) hold the promise of integrating with the rest of M365 into a unified work management solution. However, out of the box, Project for the web and the various platforms within M365 are all disparate utilities that need to be pieced together in a purpose-built manner to make use of them for holistic work management purposes.

    If you’re looking for a cohesive product out of the box, look elsewhere. If you’re looking to assemble a wide array of work, project, and portfolio management functions across different functions and departments, you may have found what you seek

    Phase 1 insight: Align your tool choice to your process maturity level.

    Rather than choosing tools based on your gaps, make sure to assess your current maturity level so that you optimize your investment in the Microsoft landscape.

    Phase 2 insight: Weigh your options before jumping into Microsoft’s new tech.

    Microsoft’s new Project plans (P1, P3, and P5) suggest there is a meaningful connection out of the box between its old tech (Project desktop, Project Server, and Project Online) and its new tech (Project for the web).

    However, the offerings are not always interoperable.

    Phase 3 insight: Keep the iterations small as you move ahead with trials and implementations.

    Organizations are changing as fast as the software we use to run them.

    If you’re implementing parts of this platform, keep the changes small as you monitor the vendors for new software versions and integrations.

    Blueprint deliverables

    Each step of this blueprint is accompanied by supporting deliverables to help you accomplish your goals:

    Key deliverable: Microsoft Project & M365 Action Plan Template

    The Action Plan will help culminate and present:

    • Context and Constraints
    • DIY Implementation Approach
    Or
    • MS Partner Implementation Approach
    • Future-State Vision and Goals
    Samples of Info-Tech's key deliverable 'Microsoft Project and M365 Action Plan Template'.

    Tool Audit Workbook

    Sample of Info-Tech deliverable 'Tool Audit Workbook'.

    Assess your organization's current work management tool landscape and determine what tools drive value for individual users and teams and which ones can be rationalized.

    Force Field Analysis

    Sample of Info-Tech deliverable 'Force Field Analysis'.

    Document the driving and resisting forces for making a change to your work management tools.

    Maturity Assessments

    Sample of Info-Tech deliverable 'Maturity Assessments'.

    Use these assessments to identify gaps in project management and project portfolio management processes. The results will help guide process improvement efforts and measure success and progress.

    Microsoft Project & M365 Licensing Tool

    Sample of Info-Tech deliverable 'Microsoft Project and M365 Licensing Tool'.

    Determine the best licensing options and approaches for your implementation of Microsoft Project.

    Curate your work management tools to harness valuable portfolio outcomes

    • Increase Project Throughput

      Do more projects by ensuring the right projects and the right amount of projects are approved and executed.
    • Support an Informed Steering Committee

      Easily compare progress of projects across the portfolio and enable the leadership team to make decisions.
    • Improve portfolio responsiveness

      Make the portfolio responsive to executive steering when new projects and changing priorities need rapid action.
    • Optimize Resource Utilization

      Assign the right resources to approved projects and minimize the chronic over-allocation of resources that leads to burnout.
    • Reduce Monetary Waste

      Terminate low-value projects early and avoid sinking additional funds into unsuccessful ventures.

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    Guided Implementation

    Workshop

    Consulting

    "Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful." "Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track." "We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place." "Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project."

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

    Guided Implementation

    What does a typical GI on this topic look like?

    A Guided Implementation (GI) is a series of calls with an Info-Tech analyst to help implement our best practices in your organization.

    A typical GI is between 6 to 8 calls over the course of 3 to 4 months.

      Introduction

    • Call #1: Scope requirements, objectives, and your specific challenges.
    • Phase 1

    • Call #2: Explore the M365 work management landscape.
    • Call #3: Discuss Microsoft Project Plans and their capabilities.
    • Call #4: Assess current-state maturity.
    • Phase 2

    • Call #5: Get familiar with extending Project for the web using Power Apps.
    • Call #6: Assess the MS Gold Partner Community.
    • Phase 3

    • Call #7: Determine approach and deployment.
    • Call #8: Discuss action plan.

    Workshop Overview

    Contact your account representative for more information.
    workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8889

    Day 1
    Assess Driving Forces and Risks

    Day 2
    Determine Tool Needs and Process Maturity

    Day 3
    Weigh Your Implementation Options

    Day 4
    Finalize Implementation Approach

    Day 5
    Next Steps and Wrap-Up (offsite)

    Activities

    • 1.1 Review the business context.
    • 1.2 Explore the M365 work management landscape.
    • 1.3 Identify driving forces for change.
    • 1.4 Analyze potential risks.
    • 1.5 Perform current-state analysis on work management tools.
    • 2.1 Review tool audit dashboard and conduct the final audit.
    • 2.2 Identify current Microsoft licensing.
    • 2.3 Assess current-state maturity for project management.
    • 2.4 Define target state for project management.
    • 2.5 Assess current-state maturity for project portfolio management.
    • 2.6 Define target state for project portfolio management.
    • 3.1 Prepare a needs assessment for Microsoft 365 and Project Plan licenses.
    • 3.2 Review the business case for Microsoft licensing.
    • 3.3 Get familiar with Project for the web.
    • 3.4 Assess the MS Gold Partner Community.
    • 3.5 Conduct a feasibility test for PFTW.
    • 4.1 Decide on the implementation approach.
    • 4.2 Identify the audience for your proposal.
    • 4.3 Determine timeline and assign accountabilities.
    • 4.4 Develop executive summary presentation.
    • 5.1 Complete in-progress deliverables from previous four days.
    • 5.2 Set up review time for workshop deliverables and to discuss next steps.

    Deliverables

    1. Force Field Analysis
    2. Tool Audit Workbook
    1. Tool Audit Workbook
    2. Project Management Maturity Assessment
    3. Portfolio Management Maturity Assessment
    1. Microsoft Project and M365 Licensing Tool
    1. Microsoft Project & M365 Action Plan
    1. Microsoft Project & M365 Action Plan

    Determine the Future of Microsoft Project for Your Organization

    Phase 1: Determine Your Tool Needs

    Phase 1: Determine Your Tool Needs

    Phase 2: Weigh Your Implementation Options Phase 3: Finalize Your Implementation Approach
    • Step 1.1: Survey the M365 work management landscape
    • Step 1.2: Explore the Microsoft Project Plans and their capabilities
    • Step 1.3: Assess the maturity of your current PM & PPM capabilities
    • Step 2.1: Get familiar with extending Project for the web using Power Apps
    • Step 2.2: Assess the MS Gold Partner Community
    • Step 3.1: Prepare an action plan

    Phase Outcomes

    • Tool Audit
    • Microsoft Project Licensing Analysis
    • Project Management Maturity Assessment
    • Project Portfolio Management Maturity Assessments

    Step 1.1

    Survey the M365 Work Management Landscape

    Activities

    • 1.1.1 Distinguish between task, project, and portfolio capabilities
    • 1.1.2 Review Microsoft’s offering for task, project, and portfolio management needs
    • 1.1.4 Assess your organizational context and constraints
    • 1.1.3 Explore typical deployment options

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Assessing your organization’s context for project and project portfolio management
    • Documenting the organization’s constraints
    • Establishing the organization’s goals and needs

    This step involves the following participants:

    • PMO Director
    • Resource Managers
    • Project Managers
    • Knowledge Workers

    Outcomes of Step

    • Knowledge of the Microsoft ecosystem as it relates to task, project, and portfolio management
    • Current organizational context and constraints

    Don’t underestimate the value of interoperability

    The whole Microsoft suite is worth more than the sum of its parts … if you know how to put it together.

    38% of the worldwide office suite market belongs to Microsoft. (Source: Statistica, 2021)

    1 in 3 small to mid-sized organizations moving to Microsoft Project say they are doing so because it integrates well with Office 365. (Source: CBT Nuggets, 2018)

    There’s a gravity to the Microsoft ecosystem.

    And while there is no argument that there are standalone task management tools, project management tools, or portfolio management tools that are likely more robust, feature-rich, and easier to adopt, it’s rare that you find an ecosystem that can do it all, to an acceptable level.

    That is the value proposition of Microsoft: the ubiquity, familiarity, and versatility. It’s the Swiss army knife of software products.

    The work management landscape is evolving

    With M365, Microsoft is angling to become the industry leader, and your organization’s hub, for work management.

    Workers lose up to 40% of their time multi-tasking and switching between applications. (Bluescape, 2018)

    25 Context switches – On average, workers switch between 10 apps, 25 times a day. (Asana, 2021)

    “Work management” is among the latest buzzwords in IT consulting.

    What is work management? It was born of a blurring of the traditional lines between operational or day-to-day tasks and project management tasks, as organizations struggle to keep up with both operational and project demands.

    To make the software easier to use, modern work management doesn’t involve the complexities from days past. You won’t find anywhere to introduce complex predecessor-successor relationships, unbalanced assignments with front-loading or back-loading, early-start/late-finish, critical path, etc.

    Indeed, with Project for the web, Azure Boards, Planner, and other M365 utilities, Microsoft is attempting to compete with lighter and better-adopted tools (e.g. Trello, Wike, Monday.com).

    The Microsoft world of work management can be understood across three broad categories

    1. Task Management

      Task management is essentially the same as keeping track of a to-do list. While you can have a project-related task, you can also have a non-project-related task. The sum of project and non-project tasks make up the work that you need to complete.
    2. Project Management

      Project management (PM) is a methodical approach to planning and guiding project processes from start to finish. Implementing PM processes helps establish repeatable steps and controls that enable project success. Documentation of PM processes leads to consistent results and dependable delivery on expectations.
    3. Portfolio Management

      Project portfolio management (PPM) is a strategic approach to approving, prioritizing, resourcing, and reporting on project. In addition, effective PPM should nurture the completion of projects in the portfolio in the most efficient way and track the extent to which the organization is realizing the intended benefits from completed projects.

    The slides ahead explain each of these modes of working in the Microsoft ecosystem in turn. Further, Info-Tech’s Task, Project, and Project Portfolio Management Tool Guides explain these areas in more detail.

    Use Info-Tech’s Tool Guides assess your MS Project and M365 work management options

    Lean on Info-Tech’s Tool Guides as you navigate Microsoft’s tasks management, project management, and project portfolio management options.

    • The slides ahead take you through a bird’s-eye view of what your MS Project and M365 work management options look like across Info-Tech’s three broad categories
    • In addition to these slides, Info-Tech has three in-depth tool guides that take you through your operational task management, project management, and project portfolio management options in MS Project and M365.
    • These tool guides can be leveraged as you determine whether Microsoft has the required toolset for your organization’s task, project, and project portfolio management needs.

    Download Info-Tech’s Task Management, Project Management, and Project Portfolio Management Tool Guides

    Task Management Overview

    What is task management?

    • It is essentially the same as keeping track of a to-do list. While you can have a project-related task, you can also have a non-project-related task. The sum of project and non-project tasks make up the work that you need to complete.

    What are the benefits of task management using applications within the MS suite?

    • Many organizations already own the tools and don't have to go out and buy something separately.
    • There is easy integration with other MS applications.

    What is personal task management?

    • Tools that allow you to structure work that is visible only to you. This can include work from tasks you are going to be completing for yourself and tasks you are completing as part of a larger work effort.

    What is team task management?

    • Tools that allow users to structure work that is visible to a group. When something is moved or changed, it affects what the group is seeing because it is a shared platform.

    Get familiar with the Microsoft product offerings for task management

    A diagram of Microsoft products and what they can help accomplish. It starts on the right with 'Teams' and 'Outlook'. Both can flow through to 'Personal Task Management' with products 'Teams Tasks' and 'To-Do', but Teams also flows into 'Team Task Management' with products 'Planner' and 'Project for the web'. See the next two slides for more details on these modes of working.

    Download the M365 Task Management Tool Guide

    Personal Task Management

    The To-Do list

    • Who does it?
      • Knowledge workers
    • What is it?
      • How each knowledge worker organizes their individual work tasks in M365
    • When is it done?
      • As needed throughout the day
    • Where is it done?
      • Paper
      • Digital location
    • How is it done?
      • DIY and self-developed
      • Usually not repeatable and evolves depending on work location and tools available
      • Not governed

    Microsoft differentiator:

    Utilities like Planner and To-Do make it easier to turn what are often ad hoc approaches into a more repeatable process.

    Team Task Management

    The SharedTo-Do list

    • Who does it?
      • Groups of knowledge workers
    • What is it?
      • Temporary and permanent collections of knowledge workers
    • When is it done?
      • As needed or on a pre-determined cadence
    • Where is it done?
      • Paper
      • Digital location
    • How is it done?
      • User norms are established organically and adapted based upon the needs of the team.
      • To whatever extent processes are repeatable in the first place, they remain repeatable only if the team is a collective.
      • Usually governed within the team and not subject to wider visibility.

    Microsoft differentiator:

    Teams has opened personal task management tactics up to more collaborative approaches.

    Project Management Overview

    2003

    Project Server: This product serves many large enterprise clients, but Microsoft has stated that it is at end of life. It is appealing to industries and organizations where privacy is paramount. This is an on-premises system that combines servers like SharePoint, SQL, and BI to report on information from Project Desktop Client. To realize the value of this product, there must be adoption across the organization and engagement at the project-task level for all projects within the portfolio.

    2013

    Project Online: This product serves many medium enterprise clients. It is appealing for IT departments who want to get a rich set of features that can be used to intake projects, assign resources, and report on project portfolio health. It is a cloud solution built on the SharePoint platform, which provides many users a sense of familiarity. However, due to the bottom-up reporting nature of this product, again, adoption across the organization and engagement at the project task level for all projects within the portfolio is critical.

    2020

    Project for the web: This product is the newest on the market and is quickly being evolved. Many O365 enthusiasts have been early adopters of Project for the web despite its limited features when compared to Project Online. It is also a cloud solution that encourages citizen developers by being built on the MS Power Platform. This positions the product well to integrate with Power BI, Power Automate, and Power Apps. It is, so far, the only MS product that lends itself to abstracted portfolio management, which means it doesn’t rely on project task level engagement to produce portfolio reports. The portfolio can also run with a mixed methodology by funneling Project, Azure Boards, and Planner boards into its roadmap function.

    Get familiar with the Microsoft product offerings for project management

    A diagram of Microsoft products and what they can help accomplish in Personal and Team Project Management. Products listed include 'Project Desktop Client', 'Project Online', 'SharePoint', 'Power Platform', 'Azure DevOps', 'Project for the web', Project Roadmap', 'Project Home', and 'Project Server'. See the next slide for more details on personal and team project management as modes of working.

    Download the M365 Project Management Tool Guide

    Project Management

    Orchestrating the delivery of project work

    • Who does it?
      • Project managers
    • What is it?
      • Individual project managers developing project plans and schedules in the MS Project Desktop Client
    • When is it done?
      • Throughout the lifecycle of the project
    • Where is it done?
      • Digital location
    • How is it done?
      • Used by individual project managers to develop and manage project plans.
      • Common approaches may or may not involve reconciliation of resource capacity through integration with Active Directory.
      • Sometimes usage norms are established by organizational project management governance standards, though individual use of the desktop client is largely ungoverned.

    Microsoft differentiator:

    For better or worse, Microsoft’s core solution is veritably synonymous with project management itself and has formally contributed to the definition of the project management space.

    Project Portfolio Management Overview

    Optimize what you’re already using and get familiar with the Power Platform.

    What does PPM look like within M365?

    • The Office suite in the Microsoft 365 suite boasts the world’s most widely used application for the purposes of abstracted and strategic PPM: Excel. For the purposes of PPM, Excel is largely implemented in a suboptimal fashion, and as a result, organizations fail to gain PPM adoption and maturation through its use.
    • Until very recently, Microsoft toolset did not explicitly address abstracted PPM needs.
    • However, with the latest version of M365 and Project for the web, Microsoft is boasting of renewed PPM capabilities from its toolset. These capabilities are largely facilitated through what Microsoft is calling its Power Platform (i.e. a suite of products that includes Power, Power Apps, and Power Automate).

    Explore the Microsoft product offering for abstracted project portfolio management

    A diagram of Microsoft products for 'Adaptive or Abstracted Portfolio Management'. Products listed include 'Excel', 'MS Lists', 'Forms', 'Teams', and the 'Power Platform' products 'Power BI', 'Power Apps', and 'Power Automate'. See the next slide for more details on adaptive or abstracted portfolio management as a mode of working.

    Download the M365 Project Portfolio Management Tool Guide

    Project Portfolio Management

    Doing the right projects, at the right time, with the right resources

    • Who does it?
      • PMO directors; portfolio managers
    • What is it?
      A strategic approach to approving, prioritizing, resourcing, and reporting on projects using applications in M365 and Project for the web. In distinction to enterprise PPM, a top-down or abstracted approach is applied, meaning PPM data is not tied to project task details.
    • Where is it done?
      • Digital tool, either homegrown or commercial
    • How is it done?
      • Currently in M365, PPM approaches are largely self-developed, though Microsoft Gold Partners are commonly involved.
      • User norms are still evolving, along with the software’s (Project for the web) function.

    Microsoft differentiator:

    Integration between Project for the web and Power Apps allows for custom approaches.

    Project Portfolio Management Overview

    Microsoft’s legacy project management toolset has contributed to the definition of traditional or enterprise PPM space.

    A robust and intensive bottom-up approach that requires task level roll-ups from projects to inform portfolio level data. For this model to work, reconciliation of individual resource capacity must be universal and perpetually current.

    If your organization has low or no maturity with PPM, this approach will be tough to make successful.

    In fact, most organizations under adopt the tools required to effectively operate with the traditional project portfolio management. Once adopted and operationalized, this combination of tools gives the executives the most precise view of the current state of projects within the portfolio.

    Explore the Microsoft product offering for enterprise project portfolio management

    A diagram of Microsoft products for 'Enterprise or Traditional Portfolio Management'. Products listed include 'Project Desktop Client', 'SharePoint', 'Project Online', 'Azure DevOps', 'Project Roadmaps', and 'Project Home'. See the next slide for more details on this as a mode of working.

    Download the M365 Project Portfolio Management Tool Guide

    Enterprise Project and Portfolio Management

    Bottom-up approach to managing the project portfolio

    • Who does it?
      • PMO and ePMO directors; portfolio managers
      • Project managers
    • What is it?
      • A strategic approach to approving, prioritizing, resourcing, and reporting on projects using applications in M365 and Project for the web. In distinction to enterprise PPM, a top-down or abstracted approach is applied, meaning PPM data is not tied to project task details.
    • Where is it done?
      • Digital tool that is usually commercial.
    • How is it done?
      • Microsoft Gold Partner involvement is highly likely in successful implementations.
      • Usage norms are long established and customized solutions are prevalent.
      • To be successful, use must be highly governed.
      • Reconciliation of individual resource capacity must be universal and perpetually current.

    Microsoft differentiator:

    Microsoft’s established network of Gold Partners helps to make this deployment a viable option.

    Assess your current tool ecosystem across work management categories

    Use Info-Tech’s Tool Audit Workbook to assess the value and satisfaction for the work management tools currently in use.

    • With the modes of working in mind that have been addressed in the previous slides and in Info-Tech’s Tool Guides, the activity slides ahead encourage you to engage your wider organization to determine all of the ways of working across individuals and teams.
    • Depending on the scope of your work management optimization, these engagements may be limited to IT or may extend to the business.
    • Use Info-Tech’s Tool Audit Workbook to help you gather and make sense of the tool data you collect. The result of this activity is to gain insight into the tools that drive value and fail to drive value across your work management categories with a view to streamline the organization’s tool ecosystem.

    Download Info-Tech’s Tool Audit Workbook

    Sample of Info-Tech's Tool Audit Workbook.

    1.2.1 Compile list of tools

    1-3 hours

    Input: Information on tools used to complete task, project, and portfolio tasks

    Output: Analyzed list of tools

    Materials: Whiteboard/Flip Charts, Tool Audit Workbook

    Participants: Portfolio Manager (PMO Director), PMO Admin Team, Project Managers, Business Stakeholders

    1. Identify the stakeholder groups that are in scope. For each group that you’ve identified, brainstorm the different tools and artifacts that are necessary to get the task, project, and project portfolio management functions done.
    2. Make sure to record the tool name and specify its category (standard document, artifact, homegrown solution, or commercial solution).
    3. Think about and discuss how often the tool is being used for each use case across the organization. Document whether its use is required. Then assess reporting functionality, data accuracy, and cost.
    4. Lastly, give a satisfaction rating for each use case.

    Excerpt from the Tool Audit Workbook

    Excerpt from Info-Tech's Tool Audit Workbook on compiling tools.

    1.2.1 Review dashboard

    1-3 hours

    Input: List of key PPM decision points, List of who is accountable for PPM decisions, List of who has PPM decision-making authority

    Output: Prioritized list of PPM decision-making support needs

    Materials: Whiteboard/Flip Charts, Tool Audit Workbook

    Participants: Portfolio Manager (PMO Director), PMO Admin Team, CIO

    Discuss the outputs of the Dashboards tab to inform your decision maker on whether to pass or fail the tool for each use case.

    Sample of a BI dashboard used to evaluate the usefulness of tools. Written notes include: 'Slice the data based on stakeholder group, tool, use case, and category', and 'Review the results of the questionnaire by comparing cost and satisfaction'.

    1.2.1 Execute final audit

    1 hour

    Input: List of key PPM decision points, List of who is accountable for PPM decisions, List of who has PPM decision-making authority

    Output: Prioritized list of PPM decision-making support needs

    Materials: Whiteboard/Flip Charts, Tool Audit Workbook

    Participants: Portfolio Manager (PMO Director), PMO Admin Team, CIO

    1. Using the information available, schedule time with the leadership team to present the results.
    2. Identify the accountable party to make the final decision on what current tools pass or fail the final audit.
    3. Mind the gap presented by the failed tools and look to possibilities within the M365 and Microsoft Project suite. For each tool that is deemed unsatisfactory for the future state, mark it as “Fail” in column O on tab 2 of the Tool Audit Workbook. This will ensure the item shows in the “Fail” column on tab 4 of the tool when you refresh the data.
    4. For each of the tools that “fail” your audit and that you’re going to make recommendations to rationalize in a future state, try to capture the annual total current-state spending on licenses, and the work modes the tool currently supports (i.e. task, project, and/or portfolio management).
    5. Additionally, start to think about future-state replacements for each tool within or outside of the M365/MS Project platforms. As we move forward to finalize your action plan in the last phase of this blueprint, we will capture and present this information to key stakeholders.

    Document your goals, needs, and constraints before proceeding

    Use Info-Tech’s Force Field Analysis Tool to help weigh goals and needs against risks and constraints associated with a work management change.

    • Now that you have discussed the organization’s ways of working and assessed its tool landscape – and made some initial decisions on some tool options that might need to change across that landscape – gather key stakeholders to define (a) why a change is needed at this time and (b) to document some of the risks and constraints associated with changing.
    • Info-Tech’s Force Field Analysis Tool can be used to capture these data points. It takes an organizational change management approach and asks you to consider the positive and negative forces associated with a work management tool change at this time.
    • The slides ahead walk you through a force field analysis activity and help you to navigate the relevant tabs in the Tool.

    Download Info-Tech's Force Field Analysis Tool

    Sample of Info-Tech's Force Field Analysis Tool.

    1.2.1 Identify goals and needs (1 of 2)

    Use tab 1 of the Force Field Analysis Workbook to assess goals and needs.

    30 minutes

    Input: Opportunities associated with determining the use case for Microsoft Project and M365 in your organization

    Output: Plotted opportunities based on probability and impact

    Materials: Whiteboard/Flip Charts, Force Field Analysis Tool

    Participants: Portfolio Manager (PMO Director), PMO Admin Team, Project Managers

    1. Brainstorm opportunities associated with exploring and/or implementing Microsoft Project and the Microsoft 365 suite of products for task, project, and project portfolio management.
    2. Document relevant opportunities in tab 1 of the Force Field Analysis Tool. For each driving force for the change (note: a driving force can include goals and needs) that is identified, provide a category that explains why the driving force is a concern (i.e. with this force is the organization looking to mature, integrate, scape, or accelerate?).
    3. In addition, assess the ease of achieving or realizing each goal or need and the impact of realizing them on the PMO and/or the organization.
    4. See the next slide for a screenshot that helps you navigate tab 1 of the Tool.

    Download the Force Field Analysis Tool

    1.2.1 Identify goals and needs (2 of 2)

    Screenshot of tab 1 of the Force Field Analysis Workbook.

    Screenshot of tab 1 of the Force Field Analysis Workbook. There are five columns referred to as columns B through F with the headings 'Opportunities', 'Category', 'Source', 'Ease of Achieving', and 'Impact on PMO/Organization'.

    In column B on tab 1, note the specific opportunities the group would like to call out.

    In column C, categorize the goal or need being articulated by the list of drop-down options: will it accelerate the time to benefit? Will it help to integrate systems and data sources? Will it mature processes and the organization overall? Will it help to scale across the organization? Choose the option that best aligns with the opportunity.

    In column D, categorize the source of the goal or need as internal or external.

    In column E, use the drop-down menus to indicate the ease of realizing each goal or need for the organization. Will it be relatively easy to manifest or will there be complexities to implementing it?

    In column F, use the drop-down menus to indicate the positive impact of realizing or achieving each need on the PMO and/or the organization.

    On tab 3 of the Force Field Analysis Workbook, your inputs on tab 1 are summarized in graphical form from columns B to G. On tab 3, these goals and needs results are contrasted with your inputs on tab 2 (see next slide).

    1.2.2 Identify risk and constraints (1 of 2)

    Use tab 2 of the Force Field Analysis Workbook to assess opposing forces to change.

    30 minutes

    Input: Risks associated with determining the use case for Microsoft Project and M365 in your organization

    Output: Plotted risks based on probability and impact

    Materials: Whiteboard/Flip Charts, Force Field Analysis Tool

    Participants: Portfolio Manager (PMO Director), PMO Admin Team, Project Managers

    1. With the same working group from 1.2.1, brainstorm risks, constraints, and other opposing forces pertaining to your potential future state.
    2. Document relevant opposing forces in tab 2 of the Force Field Analysis Tool. For each opposing force for the change (note: a driving force can include goals and needs) that is identified, provide a category that explains why the opposing force is a concern (i.e. will it impact or is it impacted by time, resources, maturity, budget, or culture?).
    3. In addition, assess the likelihood of the risk or constraint coming to light and the negative impact of it coming to light for your proposed change.
    4. See the next slide for a screenshot that helps you navigate tab 2 of the Force Field Analysis Tool.

    Download the Force Field Analysis Tool

    1.2.2 Identify risk and constraints (2 of 2)

    Screenshot of tab 2 of the Force Field Analysis Workbook.

    Screenshot of tab 2 of the Force Field Analysis Workbook. There are five columns referred to as columns B through F with the headings 'Risks and Constraints', 'Category', 'Source', 'Likelihood of Constraint/Risk/Resisting Force Being Felt', and 'Impact to Derailing Goals and Needs'.

    In column B on tab 2, note the specific risks and constraints the group would like to call out.

    In column C, categorize the risk or constraint being articulated by the list of drop-down options: will it impact or is it impacted by time, resources, budget, culture or maturity?

    In column D, categorize the source of the goal or need as internal or external.

    In column E, use the drop-down menus to indicate the likelihood of each risk or constraint materializing during your implementation. Will it definitely occur or is there just a small chance it could come to light?

    In column F, use the drop-down menus to indicate the negative impact of the risk or constraint to achieving your goals and needs.

    On tab 3 of the Force Field Analysis Workbook, your inputs on tab 2 are summarized in graphical form from columns I to N. On tab 3, your risk and constraint results are contrasted with your inputs on tab 1 to help you gauge the relative weight of driving vs. opposing forces.

    Step 1.2

    Explore the Microsoft Project Plans and their capabilities

    Activities

    • 1.1.1 Review the Microsoft 365 licensing features
    • 1.1.2 Explore the Microsoft Project Plan licenses
    • 1.1.3 Prepare a needs assessment for Microsoft 365 and Project Plan licenses

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Review the suite of task management, project management, and project portfolio management options available in Microsoft 365.
    • Prepare a preliminary checklist of required M365 apps for your stakeholders.

    This step usually involves the following participants:

    • PMO/Portfolio Manager
    • Project Managers
    • CIO and other executive stakeholders
    • Other project portfolio stakeholders (project and IT workers)

    Outcomes of Step

    • Preliminary requirements for an M365 project management and project portfolio management tool implementation

    Microsoft recently revamped its project plans to balance its old and new tech

    Access to the new tech, Project for the web, comes with all license types, while Project Online Professional and Premium licenses have been revamped as P3 and P5.

    Navigating Microsoft licensing is never easy, and Project for the web has further complicated licensing needs for project professionals.

    As we’ll cover in step 2.1 of this blueprint, Project for the web can be extended beyond its base lightweight work management functionality using the Power Platform (Power Apps, Power Automate, and Power BI). Depending on the scope of your implementation, this can require additional Power Platform licensing.

    • In this step, we will help you understand the basics of what’s already included in your enterprise M365 licensing as well as what’s new in Microsoft’s recent Project licensing plans (P1, P3, and P5).
    • As we cover toward the end of this step, you can use Info-Tech’s MS Project and M365 Licensing Tool to help you understand your plan and licensing needs. Further assistance on licensing can be found in the Task, Project, and Portfolio Management Tool Guides that accompany this blueprint and Info-Tech’s Modernize Your Microsoft Licensing for the Cloud Era.

    Download Info-Tech’s Modernize Your Microsoft Licensing for the Cloud Era

    Licensing features for knowledge workers

    Please note that licensing packages are frequently subject to change. This is up to date as of August 2021. For the most up-to-date information on licensing, visit the Microsoft website.

    Bundles are extremely common and can be more cost effective than à la carte options for the Microsoft products.

    The biggest differentiator between M365 and O365 is that the M365 product also includes Windows 10 and Enterprise Mobility and Security.

    The color coding in the diagram indicates that the same platform/application suite is available.

    Platform or Application M365 E3 M365 E5 O365 E1 O365 E3 O365 E5
    Microsoft Forms X X X X X
    Microsoft Lists X X X X X
    OneDrive X X X X X
    Planner X X X X X
    Power Apps for Office 365 X X X X X
    Power Automate for Office X X X X X
    Power BI Pro X X
    Power Virtual Agents for Teams X X X X X
    SharePoint X X X X X
    Stream X X X X X
    Sway X X X X X
    Teams X X X X X
    To Do X X X X X

    Get familiar with Microsoft Project Plan 1

    Please note that licensing packages are frequently subject to change. This is up to date as of August 2021. For the most up to date information on licensing, visit the Microsoft website.

    Who is a good fit?

    • New project managers
    • Zero-allocation project managers
    • Individuals and organizations who want to move out of Excel into something less fragile (easily breaking formulas)

    What does it include?

    • Access to Project Home, a landing page to access all project plans you’ve created or have been assigned to.
    • Access to Grid View, Board View, and Timeline (Gantt) View to plan and manage your projects with Project for the web
    • Sharing Project for the web plans across Microsoft Teams channels
    • Co-authoring on project plans

    When does it make sense?

    • Lightweight project management
    • No process to use bottom-up approach for resourcing data
    • Critical-path analysis is not required
    • Organization does not have an appetite for project management rigor

    Get familiar with Microsoft Project Plan 3

    Please note that licensing packages are frequently subject to change. This is up to date as of August 2021. For the most up to date information on licensing, visit the Microsoft website.

    Who is a good fit?

    • Experienced and dedicated project managers
    • Organizations with complex projects
    • Large project teams are required to complete project work
    • Organizations have experience using project management software

    What does it include?

    Everything in Project Plan 1 plus the following:

    • Reporting through Power BI Report template apps (note that there are no pre-built reports for Project for the web)
    • Access to build a Roadmap of projects from Project for the web and Azure DevOps with key milestones, statuses, and deadlines
    • Project Online to submit and track timesheets for project teams
    • MS Project Desktop Client to support resource management

    When does it make sense?

    • Project management is an established discipline at the organization
    • Critical-path analysis is commonly used
    • Organization has some appetite for project management rigor
    • Resources are expected to submit timesheets to allow for more precise resource management data

    Get familiar with Microsoft Project Plan 5

    Please note that licensing packages are frequently subject to change. This is up to date as of August 2021. For the most up to date information on licensing, visit the Microsoft website.

    Who is a good fit?

    • Experienced and dedicated project managers
    • Experienced and dedicated PMO directors
    • Dedicated portfolio managers
    • Organizations proficient at sustaining data in a standard tool

    What does it include?

    Everything in Project Plan 3 plus the following:

    • Portfolio selection and optimization
    • Demand management
    • Enterprise resource planning and management through deterministic task and resource scheduling
    • MS Project Desktop Client to support resource management

    When does it make sense?

    • Project management is a key success factor at the organization
    • Organization employs a bottom-up approach for resourcing data
    • Critical-path analysis is required
    • Formal project portfolio management processes are well established
    • The organization is willing to either put in the time, energy, and resources to learn to configure the system through DIY or is willing to leverage a Microsoft Partner to help them do so

    What’s included in each plan (1 of 2)

    Plan details are up to date as of September 2021. Plans and pricing can change often. Visit the Microsoft website to validate plan options and get pricing details.
    MS Project Capabilities Info-Tech's Editorial Description P1 P3 P5
    Project Home Essentially a landing page that allows you to access all the project plans you've created or that you're assigned to. It amalgamates plans created in Project for the web, the Project for the web app in Power Apps, and Project Online. X X X
    Grid view One of three options in which to create your project plans in Project for the web (board view and timeline view are the other options). You can switch back and forth between the options. X X X
    Board view One of three options in which to create your project plans in Project for the web (grid view and timeline view are the other options). You can switch back and forth between the options. X X X
    Timeline (Gantt) view One of three options in which to create your project plans in Project for the web (board view and grid view are the other options). You can switch back and forth between the options. X X X
    Collaboration and communication This references the ability to add Project for the web project plans to Teams channels. X X X
    Coauthoring Many people can have access to the same project plan and can update tasks. X X X
    Project planning and scheduling For this the marketing lingo says "includes familiar scheduling tools to assign project tasks to team members and use different views like Grid, Board, and Timeline (Gantt chart) to oversee the schedule." Unclear how this is different than the project plans in the three view options above. X X X

    X - Functionality Included in Plan

    O - Functionality Not Included in Plan

    What’s included in each plan (2 of 2)

    Plan details are up to date as of September 2021. Plans and pricing can change often. Visit the Microsoft website to validate plan options and get pricing details.
    MS Project Capabilities Info-Tech's Editorial Description P1 P3 P5
    Reporting This seems to reference Excel reports and the Power BI Report Template App, which can be used if you're using Project Online. There are no pre-built reports for Project for the web, but third-party Power Apps are available. O X X
    Roadmap Roadmap is a platform that allows you to take one or more projects from Project for the web and Azure DevOps and create an organizational roadmap. Once your projects are loaded into Roadmap you can perform additional customizations like color status reporting and adding key days and milestones. O X X
    Timesheet submission Project Online and Server 2013 and 2016 allow team members to submit timesheets if the functionality is required. O X X
    Resource management The rich MS Project client supports old school, deterministic project scheduling at the project level. O X X
    Desktop client The full desktop client comes with P3 and P5, where it acts as the rich editor for project plans. The software enjoys a multi-decade market dominance as a project management tool but was never paired with an enterprise collaboration server engine that enjoyed the same level of success. O X X
    Portfolio selection and optimization Portfolio selection and optimization has been offered as part of the enterprise project and portfolio suite for many years. Most people taking advantage of this capability have used a Microsoft Partner to formalize and operationalize the feature. O O X
    Demand Management Enterprise demand management is targeted at the most rigorous of project portfolio management practices. Most people taking advantage of this capability have used a Microsoft Partner to formalize and operationalize the feature. O O X
    Enterprise resource planning and management The legacy MS Project Online/Server platform supports enterprise-wide resource capacity management through an old-school, deterministic task and resource scheduling engine, assuming scaled-out deployment of Active Directory. Most people succeeding with this capability have used a Microsoft Partner to formalize and operationalize the feature. O O X

    X - Functionality Included in Plan

    O - Functionality Not Included in Plan

    Use Info-Tech’s MS Project and M365 Licensing Tool

    Leverage the analysis in Info-Tech’s MS Project & M365 Licensing Tool to help inform your initial assumptions about what you need and how much to budget for it.

    • The Licensing Tool can help you determine what Project Plan licensing different user groups might need as well as additional Power Platform licensing that may be required.
    • It consists of four main tabs: two set-up tabs where you can validate the plan and pricing information for M365 and MS Project; an analysis tab where you set up your user groups and follow a survey to assess their Project Plan needs; and another analysis tab where you can document your Power Platform licensing needs across your user groups.
    • There is also a business case tab that breaks down your total licensing needs. The outputs of this tab can be used in your MS Project & M365 Action Plan Template, which we will help you develop in phase three of this blueprint.

    Download Info-Tech's Microsoft Project & M365 Licensing Tool

    Sample of Info-Tech's Microsoft Project and M365 Licensing Tool.

    1.2.1 Conduct a needs assessment

    1-2 hours

    Input: List of key user groups/profiles, Number of users and current licenses

    Output: List of Microsoft applications/capabilities included with each license, Analysis of user group needs for Microsoft Project Plan licenses

    Materials: Microsoft Project & 365 Licensing Tool

    Participants: Portfolio Manager (PMO Director), PMO Admin Team, Project Managers

    1. As a group, analyze the applications included in your current or desired 365 license and calculate any additional Power Platform licensing needs.
    2. Screenshot of the 'Application/Capabilities' screen from the 'Microsoft Project and M365 Licensing Tool'.
    3. Within the same group, use the drop-down menus to analyze your high-level MS Project requirements by selecting whether each capability is necessary or not.
    4. Your inputs to the needs assessment will determine the figures in the Business Case tab. Consider exporting this information to PDF or other format to distribute to stakeholders.
    5. Screenshot of the 'Business Case' tab from the 'Microsoft Project and M365 Licensing Tool'.

    Download Info-Tech's Microsoft Project & M365 Licensing Tool

    Step 1.3

    Assess the maturity of your current PM & PPM capabilities

    Activities

    • Assess current state project and project portfolio management processes and tools
    • Determine target state project and project portfolio management processes and tools

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Assess current state project and project portfolio management processes and tools
    • Determine target state project and project portfolio management processes and tools

    This step usually involves the following participants:

    • PMO/Portfolio Manager
    • Project Managers
    • CIO and other executive stakeholders
    • Other project portfolio stakeholders (project and IT workers)

    Outcomes of Step

    • Current and target state maturity for project management and project portfolio management processes

    Project portfolio management and project management are more than tools

    Implementing commercial tools without a matching level of process discipline is a futile exercise, leaving organizations frustrated at the wasted time and money.

    • The tool is only as good as the data that is input. There is often a misunderstanding that a tool will be “automatic.” While it is true that a tool can help make certain processes easier and more convenient by aggregating information, enhancing reporting, and coauthoring, it will not make up the data. If data becomes stale, the tool is no longer valid for accurate decision making.
    • Getting people onboard and establishing a clear process is often the hardest part. As IT folk, it can be easy to get wrapped up in the technology. All too often excitement around tools can drown out the important requisites around people and process. The reality is people and process are a necessary condition for a tool to be successful. Having a tool will not be sufficient to overcome obstacles like poor stakeholder buy-in, inadequate governance, and the absence of a standard operating procedure.

    • Slow is the way to go. When deciding what tools to purchase, start small and scale up rather than going all in and all too often ending up with many unused features and fees.

    "There's been a chicken-egg debate raging in the PPM world for decades: What comes first, the tool or the process? It seems reasonable to say, ‘We don't have a process now, so we'll just adopt the one in the tool.’ But you'll soon find out that the tool doesn't have a process, and you needed to do more planning and analysis before buying the tool." (Barry Cousins, Practice Lead, Project Portfolio Management)

    Assess your process maturity to determine the right tool approach

    Take the time to consider and reflect on the current and target state of the processes for project portfolio management and project management.

    Project Portfolio Management

    • Status and Progress Reporting
      1. Intake, Approval, and Prioritization

        PPM is the practice of selecting the right projects and ensuring the organization has the necessary resources to complete them. PPM should enable executive decision makers to make sense of the excess of demand and give IT the ability to prioritize those projects that are most valuable to the business.
      2. Resource Management

      3. Project Management

        1. Initiation
        2. Planning
        3. Execution
        4. Monitoring and Controlling
        5. Closing
        Tailor a project management framework to fit your organization. Formal methodologies aren’t always the best fit. Take what you can use from formal frameworks and define a right-sized approach to your project management processes.
      4. Project Closure

      5. Benefits Tracking

    Info-Tech’s maturity assessment tools can help you match your tools to your maturity level

    Use Info-Tech’s Project Portfolio Management Maturity Assessment Tool and Project Management Maturity Assessment Tool.

    • The next few slides in this step take you through using our maturity assessment tools to help gauge your current-state and target-state maturity levels for project management (PM) and project portfolio management (PPM).
    • In addition to the process maturity assessments, these workbooks also help you document current-state support tools and desired target-state tools.
    • The outputs of these workbooks can be used in your MS Project & M365 Action Plan Template, which we will help you develop in phase three of this blueprint.

    Download Info-Tech’s Project Portfolio Management Maturity Assessment Tool and Project Management Maturity Assessment Tool

    Samples of Info-Tech's Project Portfolio Management Maturity Assessment Tool and Project Management Maturity Assessment Tool.

    Conduct a gap analysis survey for both project and project portfolio management.

    • Review the category and activity statements: For each gap analysis tab in the maturity assessments, use the comprehensive activity statements to identify gaps for the organization.
    • Assess the current state: To assess the current state, evaluate whether the statement should be labeled as:
      • Absent: There is no evidence of any activities supporting this process.
      • Initial: Activity is ad hoc and not well defined.
      • Defined: Activity is established and there is moderate adherence to its execution.
      • Repeatable: Activity is established, documented, repeatable, and integrated with other phases of the process.
      • Managed: Activity execution is tracked by gathering qualitative and quantitative feedback

    Once this is documented, take some time to describe the type of tool being used to do this (commercial, home-grown, standardized document) and provide additional details, where applicable.

    Define the target state: Repeat the assessment of activity statements for the target state. Then gauge the organizational impact and complexity of improving each capability on a scale of very low to very high.

    Excerpt from Info-Tech's Project Portfolio Management Maturity Assessment Tool, the 'PPM Current State Target State Maturity Assessment Survey'. It has five columns whose purpose is denoted in notes. Column 1 'Category within the respective discipline'; Column 2 'Statement to consider'; Column 3 'Select the appropriate answer for current and target state'; Column 4 'Define the tool type'; Column 5 'Provide addition detail about the tool'.

    Analyze survey results for project and project portfolio management maturity

    Take stock of the gap between current state and target state.

    • What process areas have the biggest gap between current and target state?
    • What areas are aligned across current and target state?

    Identify what areas are currently the least and most mature.

    • What process area causes the most pain in the organization?
    • What process area is the organization’s lowest priority?

    Note the overall current process maturity.

    • After having done this exercise, does the overall maturity come as a surprise?
    • If so, what are some of the areas that were previously overlooked?
    A table and bar graph documenting and analysis of maturity survey results. The table has four columns labelled 'Process Area', 'Current Process Completeness', 'Current Maturity Level', and 'Target State Maturity'. Rows headers in the 'Process Area' column are 'Intake, Approval, and Prioritization', 'Resource Management', 'Portfolio Reporting', 'Project Closure and Benefits Realization', 'Portfolio Administration', and finally 'Overall Maturity'. The 'Current Process Completeness' column's values are in percentages. The 'Current Maturity Level' and 'Target State Maturity' columns' values can be one of the following: 'Absent', 'Initial', 'Defined', 'Repeatable', or 'Managed'. The bar chart visualizes the levels of the 'Target State' and 'Current State' with 'Absent' from 0-20%, 'Initial' from 20-40%, 'Defined' from 40-60%, 'Repeatable' from 60-80%, and 'Managed' from 80-100%.
    • Identify process areas with low levels of maturity
    • Spot areas of inconsistency between current and target state.
    • Assess the overall gap to get a sense of the magnitude of the effort required to get to the target state.
    • 100% doesn’t need to be the goal. Set a goal that is sustainable and always consider the value to effort ratio.

    Screenshot your results and put them into the MS Project and M365 Action Plan Template.

    Review the tool overview and plan to address gaps (tabs 3 & 4)

    Tool Overview:

    Analyze the applications used to support your project management and project portfolio management processes.

    Look for:

    • Tools that help with processes across the entire PM or PPM lifecycle.
    • Tools that are only used for one specific process.

    Reflect on the overlap between process areas with pain points and the current tools being used to complete this process.

    Consider the sustainability of the target-state tool choice

    Screenshot of a 'Tool Overview' table. Chart titled 'Current-to-Target State Supporting Tools by PPM Activity' documenting the current and target states of different supporting tools by PPM Activity. Tools listed are 'N/A', 'Standardized Document', 'Homegrown Tool', and 'Commercial Tool'.

    You have the option to create an action plan for each of the areas of improvement coming out of your maturity assessment.

    This can include:

    • Tactical Optimization Action: What is the main action needed to improve capability?
    • Related Actions: Is there a cross-over with any actions for other capabilities?
    • Timeframe: Is this near-term, mid-term, or long-term?
    • Proposed Start Date
    • Proposed Go-Live Date
    • RACI: Who will be responsible, accountable, consulted, and informed?
    • Status: What is the status of this action item over time?

    Determine the Future of Microsoft Project for Your Organization

    Phase 2: Weigh Your Implementation Options

    Phase 1: Determine Your Tool Needs

    Phase 2: Weigh Your Implementation Options

    Phase 3: Finalize Your Implementation Approach
    • Step 1.1: Survey the M365 work management landscape
    • Step 1.2: Perform a process maturity assessment to help inform your M365 starting point
    • Step 1.3: Consider the right MS Project licenses for your stakeholders
    • Step 2.1: Get familiar with extending Project for the web using Power Apps
    • Step 2.2: Assess the MS Gold Partner Community
    • Step 3.1: Prepare an action plan

    Phase Outcomes

    • A decision on how best to proceed (or not proceed) with Project for the web
    • A Partner outreach plan

    Step 2.1

    Get familiar with extending Project for the web using Power Apps

    Activities

    • Get familiar with Project for the web: how it differs from Microsoft’s traditional project offerings and where it is going
    • Understand the basics of how to extend Project for the web in Power Apps
    • Perform a feasibility test

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Get familiar with Project for the web
    • Understand the basics of how to extend Project for the web in Power Apps
    • Perform a feasibility test to determine if taking a DIY approach to extending Project for the web is right for your organization currently

    This step usually involves the following participants:

    • Portfolio Manager (PMO Director)
    • Project Managers
    • Other relevant PMO stakeholders

    Outcomes of Step

    • A decision on how best to proceed (or not proceed) with Project for the web

    Project for the web is the latest of Microsoft’s project management offerings

    What is Project for the web?

    • First introduced in 2019 as Project Service, Project for the web (PFTW) is Microsoft’s entry into the world of cloud-based work management and lightweight project management options.
    • Built on the Power Platform and leveraging the Dataverse for data storage, PFTW integrates with the many applications that M365 users are already employing in their day-to-day work management and collaboration activities.
    • It is available as a part of your M365 subscription with the minimum activation of P1 license – it comes with P3 and P5 licenses as well.
    • From a functionality and user experience perspective, PFTW is closer to applications like Planner or Azure Boards than it is to traditional MS Project options.

    What does it do?

    • PFTW allows for task and dependency tracking and basic timeline creation and scheduling and offers board and grid view options. It also allows real-time coauthoring of tasks among team members scheduled to the same project.
    • PFTW also comes with a product/functionality Microsoft calls Roadmap, which allows users to aggregate multiple project timelines into a single view for reporting purposes.

    What doesn't it do?

    • With PFTW, Microsoft is offering noticeably less traditional project management functionality than its existing solutions. Absent are table stakes project management capabilities like critical path, baselining, resource load balancing, etc.

    Who is it for?

    • Currently, in its base lightweight project management option, PFTW is targeted toward occasional or part-time project managers (not the PMP-certified set) tasked with overseeing and/or collaborating on small to mid-sized initiatives and projects.

    Put Project for the web in perspective

    Out of the box, PFTW occupies a liminal space when it comes to work management options

    • More than a task management tool, but not quite a full project management tool
    • Not exactly a portfolio management tool, yet some PPM reporting functionality is inherent in the PFTW through Roadmap

    The table to the right shows some of the functionality in PFTW in relation to the task management functionality of Planner and the enterprise project and portfolio management functionality of Project Online.

    Table 2.1a Planner Project for the web Project Online
    Coauthoring on Tasks X X
    Task Planning X X X
    Resource Assignments X X X
    Board Views X X X
    MS Teams Integration X X X
    Roadmap X X
    Table and Gantt Views X X
    Task Dependency Tracking X X
    Timesheets X
    Financial Planning X
    Risks and Issues Tracking X
    Program Management X
    Advanced Portfolio Management X

    Project for the web will eventually replace Project Online

    • As early as 2018 Microsoft has been foreshadowing a transition away from the SharePoint-backed Project environments of Server and Online toward something based in Common Data Service (CDS) – now rebranded as the Dataverse.
    • Indeed, as recently as the spring of 2021, at its Reimagine Project Management online event, Microsoft reiterated its plans to sunset Project Online and transition existing Online users to the new environment of Project for the web – though it provided no firm dates when this might occur.
      • The reason for this move away from Online appears to be an acknowledgment that the rigidity of the tool is awkward in our current dynamic, collaborative, and overhead-adverse work management paradigm.
      • To paraphrase a point made by George Bullock, Sr. Product Marketing Manager, for Microsoft at the Reimagine Project Management event, teams want to manage work as they see fit, but the rigidity of legacy solutions doesn’t allow for this, leading to a proliferation of tools and data sprawl. (This comment was made during the “Overview of Microsoft Project” session during the Reimagine event.)

    PFTW is Microsoft’s proposed future-state antidote to this challenge. Its success will depend on how well users are able to integrate the solution into a wider M365 work management setting.

    "We are committed to supporting our customers on Project Online and helping them transition to Project for the Web. No end-of-support has been set for Project Online, but when the time comes, we will communicate our plans on the transition path and give you plenty of advance notice." (Heather Heide, Program Manager, Microsoft Planner and Project. This comment was made during the “Overview of Microsoft Project” session during the Reimagine event.)

    Project for the web can be extended beyond its base lightweight functionality

    Project for the web can be extended to add more traditional and robust project and project portfolio management functionality using the Power Platform.

    Microsoft plans to sunset Project Online in favor of PFTW will at first be a head-scratcher for those familiar with the extensive PPM functionality in Project Online and underwhelmed by the project and portfolio management in PFTW.

    However, having built the solution upon the Power Platform, Microsoft has made it possible to take the base functionality in PFTW and extend it to create a more custom, organizationally specific user experience.

    • With a little taste of what can be done with PFTW by leveraging the Power Platform – and, in particular, Power Apps – it becomes more obvious how we, as users, can begin to evolve the base tool toward a more traditional PPM solution and how, in time, Microsoft’s developers may develop the next iteration of PFTW into something more closely resembling Project Online.

    Before users get too excited about using these tools to build a custom PPM approach, we should consider the time, effort, and skills required. The slides ahead will take you through a series of considerations to help you gauge whether your PMO is ready to go it alone in extending the solution.

    Extending the tool enhances functionality

    Table 2.1a in this step displayed the functionality in PFTW in relation to the task management tool Planner and the robust PPM functionality in Online.

    The table to the right shows how the functionality in PFTW can differ from the base solution and Project Online when it is extended using the model-driven app option in Power Apps.

    Caveat: The list of functionality and processes in this table is sample data.

    This functionality is not inherent in the solution as soon as you integrate with Power Apps. Rather it must be built – and your success in developing these functions will depend upon the time and skills you have available.

    Table 2.1b Project for the web PFTW extended with PowerApps Project Online
    Critical Path X
    Timesheets X
    Financial Planning X X
    Risks and Issues Tracking X X
    Program Management X
    Status Updates X
    Project Requests X
    Business Cases X
    Project Charters X
    Resource Planning and Capacity Management X X
    Project Change Requests X

    Get familiar with the basics of Power Apps before you decide to go it alone

    While the concept of being able to customize and grow a commercial PPM tool is enticing, the reality of low-code development and application maintenance may be too much for resource-constrained PMOs.

    Long story short: Extending PFTW in Power Apps is time consuming and can be frustrating for the novice to intermediate user.

    It can take days, even weeks, just to find your feet in Power Apps, let alone to determine requirements to start building out a custom model-driven app. The latter activity can entail creating custom columns and tables, determining relationships between tables to get required outputs, in addition to basic design activities.

    Time-strapped and resource-constrained practitioners should pause before committing to this deployment approach. To help better understand the commitment, the slides ahead cover the basics of extending PFTW in Power Apps:

    1. Dataverse environments.
    2. Navigating Power App Designer and Sitemap Designer
    3. Customizing tables and forms in the Dataverse

    See Info-Tech’s M365 Project Portfolio Management Tool Guide for more information on Power Apps in general.

    Get familiar with Power Apps licensing

    Power Apps for 365 comes with E1 through E5 M365 licenses (and F3 and F5 licenses), though additional functionality can be purchased if required.

    While extending Project for the web with Power Apps does not at this time, in normal deployments, require additional licensing from what is included in a E3 or E5 license, it is not out of the realm of possibility that a more complex deployment could incur costs not included in the Power Apps for 365 that comes with your enterprise agreement.

    The table to the right shows current additional licensing options.

    Power Apps, Per User, Per App Plan

    Per User Plan

    Cost: US$10 per user per app per month, with a daily Dataverse database capacity of 40 MB and a daily Power Platform request capacity of 1,000. Cost: US$40 per user per month, with a daily Dataverse database capacity of 250 MB and a daily Power Platform request capacity of 5,000.
    What's included? This option is marketed as the option that allows organizations to “get started with the platform at a lower entry point … [or those] that run only a few apps.” Users can run an application for a specific business case scenario with “the full capabilities of Power Apps” (meaning, we believe, that unlicensed users can still submit data via an app created by a licensed user). What's included? A per-user plan allows licensed users to run unlimited canvas apps and model-driven apps – portal apps, the licensing guide says, can be “provisioned by customers on demand.” Dataverse database limits (the 250 MB and 5,000 request capacity mentioned above) are pooled at the per tenant, not the per user plan license, capacity.

    For more on Power Apps licensing, refer to Info-Tech’s Modernize Your Microsoft Licensing for the Cloud Era for more information.

    What needs to be configured?

    Extending Project for the web requires working with your IT peers to get the right environments configured based upon your needs.

    • PFTW data is stored in the Microsoft Dataverse (formerly Common Data Service or CDS).
    • The organization’s Dataverse can be made up of one to many environments based upon its needs. Environments are individual databases with unique proprieties in terms of who can access them and what applications can store data in them.
    • Project for the web supports three different types of environments: default, production, and sandbox.
    • You can have multiple instances of a custom PFTW app deployed across these environments and across different users – and the environment you choose depends upon the use case of each instance.

    Types of Environments

    • Default Environment

      • It is the easiest to deploy and get started with the PFTW Power App in the default environment. However, it is also the most restricted environment with the least room for configuration.
      • Microsoft recommends this environment for simple deployments or for projects that span the organization. This is because everyone in the organization is by default a member of this environment – and, with the least room for configuration, the app is relatively straightforward.
      • At minimum, you need one project license to deploy PFTW in the default environment.
    • Production Environment

      • This environment affords more flexibility for how a custom app can be configured and deployed. Unlike the default environment, deploying a production environment is a manual process (through the Power Platform Admin Center) and security roles need to be set to limit users who can access the environment.
      • Because users can be limited, production environments can be used to support more advanced deployments and can support diverse processes for different teams.
      • At present, you need at least five Project licenses to deploy to production environments.
    • Sandbox Environment

      • This environment is for users who are responsible for the creation of custom apps. It offers the same functionality as a production environment but allows users to make changes without jeopardizing a production environment.

    Resources to provide your IT colleagues with to help in your PFTW deployment:

    1. Project for the web admin help (Product Documentation, Microsoft)
    2. Advanced deployment for Project for the web (Video, Microsoft)
    3. Get Started with Project Power App (Product Support Documentation, Microsoft)
    4. Project for the Web Security Roles (Product Support Documentation, Microsoft)

    Get started creating or customizing a model-driven app

    With the proper environments procured, you can now start extending Project for the web.

    • Navigate to the environment you would like to extend PFTW within. For the purposes of the slides ahead, we’ll be using a sandbox environment for an example. Ensure you have the right access set up for production and sandbox environments of your own (see links on previous slide for more assistance).
    • To begin extending PFTW, the two core features you need to be familiar with before you start in Power Apps are (1) Tables/Entities and (2) the Power Apps Designer – and in particular the Site Map.

    From the Power Apps main page in 365, you can change your environment by selecting from the options in the top right-hand corner of the screen.

    Screenshot of the Power Apps “Apps” page in a sandbox environment. The Project App will appear as “Project” when the application is installed, though it is also easy to create an app from scratch.

    Model-driven apps are built around tables

    In Power Apps, tables (formerly called entities and still referred to as entities in the Power Apps Designer) function much like tables in Excel: they are containers of columns of data for tracking purposes. Tables define the data for your app, and you build your app around them.

    In general, there are three types of tables:

    • Standard: These are out-of-the box tables included with a Dataverse environment. Most standard tables can be customized.
    • Managed: These are tables that get imported into an environment as part of a managed solution. Managed tables cannot be customized.
    • Custom: These types of tables can either be imported from another solution or created directly in the Dataverse environment. To create custom tables, users need to have System Administrator or System Customizer security roles within the Dataverse.

    Tables can be accessed under Data banner on the left-hand panel of your Power Apps screen.

    The below is a list of standard tables that can be used to customize your Project App.

    A screenshot of the 'Data' banner in 'Power Apps' and a list of table names.

    Table Name

    Display Name

    msdyn_project Project
    msdyn_projectchange Change
    msdyn_projectprogram Program
    msdyn_projectrequest Request
    msdyn_projectrisk Risk
    msdyn_projectissue Issue
    msdyn_projectstatusreport Status

    App layouts are designed in the Power App Designer

    You configure tables with a view to using them in the design of your app in the Power Apps Designer.

    • If you’re customizing a Project for the web app manually installed into your production or sandbox environment, you can access Designer by highlighting the app from your list of apps on the Apps page and clicking “Edit” in the ribbon above.
      • If you’re creating a model-driven app from scratch, Designer will open past the “Create a New App” intro screen.
      • If you need to create separate apps in your environment for different PMOs or business units, it is as easy to create an app from scratch as it is to customize the manual install.
    • The App Designer is where you can design the layout of your model-driven app and employ the right data tables.
    Screenshot of the 'App Designer' screen in 'Power Apps'.

    The Site Map determines the navigation for your app, i.e. it is where you establish the links and pages users will navigate. We will review the basics of the sitemap on the next few slides.

    The tables that come loaded into your Project Power App environment (at this time, 37) via the manual install will appear in the Power Apps Designer in the Entity View pane at the bottom of the page. You do not have to use all of them in your design.

    Navigate the Sitemap Designer

    With the components of the previous two slides in mind, let’s walk through how to use them together in the development of a Project app.

    As addressed in the previous slide, the sitemap determines the navigation for your app, i.e. it is where you establish the links and the pages that users will navigate.

    To get to the Sitemap Designer, highlight the Project App from your list of apps on the Apps page and click “Edit” in the ribbon above. If you’re creating a model-driven app from scratch, Designer will open past the “Create a New App” intro screen.

    • To start designing your app layout, click the pencil icon beside the Site Map logo on the App Designer screen.
    • This will take you into the Sitemap Designer (see screenshot to the right). This is where you determine the layout of your app and the relevant data points (and related tables from within the Dataverse) that will factor into your Project App.
    • In the Sitemap Designer, you simply drag and drop the areas, groups, and subareas you want to see in your app’s user interface (see next slide for more details).
    Screenshot of the 'Sitemap Designer' in 'Power Apps'.

    Use Areas, Groups, and Subareas as building blocks for your App

    Screenshots of the main window and the right-hand panel in the 'Sitemap Designer', and of the subarea pop-up panel where you connect components to data tables. The first two separate elements into 'Area', 'Group', and 'Subarea'.

    Drag and drop the relevant components from the panel on the right-hand side of the screen into the main window to design the core pieces that will be present within your user interface.

    For each subarea in your design, use the pop-up panel on the right-hand side of the screen to connect your component the relevant table from within your Dataverse environment.

    How do Areas, Groups, and Subareas translate into an app?

    Screenshots of the main window in the 'Sitemap Designer' and of a left-hand panel from a published 'Project App'. There are notes defining the terms 'Area', 'Group', and 'Subarea' in the context of the screenshot.

    The names or titles for your Areas and Groups can be customized within the Sitemap Designer.

    The names or titles for your Subareas is dependent upon your table name within the Dataverse.

    Area: App users can toggle the arrows to switch between Areas.

    Group: These will change to reflect the chosen Area.

    Subarea: The tables and forms associated with each subarea.

    How to properly save and publish your changes made in the Sitemap Designer and Power Apps Designer:

    1. When you are done making changes to your components within the Sitemap Designer, and want your changes to go live, hit the “Publish” button in the top right corner; when it has successfully published, select “Save and Close.”
    2. You will be taken back to the Power App Designer homepage. Hit “Save,” then “Publish,” and then finally “Play,” to go to your app or “Save and Close.”

    How to find the right tables in the Dataverse

    While you determine which tables will play into your app in the Sitemap Designer, you use the Tables link to customize tables and forms.

    Screenshots of the tables search screen and the 'Tables' page under the 'Data' banner in 'Power Apps'.

    The Tables page under the Data banner in Power Apps houses all of the tables available in your Dataverse environment. Do not be overwhelmed or get too excited. Only a small portion of the tables in the Tables folder in Power Apps will be relevant when it comes to extending PFTW.

    Find the table you would like to customize and/or employ in your app and select it. The next slides will look at customizing the table (if you need to) and designing an app based upon the table.

    To access all the tables in your environment, you’ll need to ensure your filter is set correctly on the top right-hand corner of the screen, otherwise you will only see a small portion of the tables in your Dataverse environment.

    If you’re a novice, it will take you some time to get familiar with the table structure in the Dataverse.

    We recommend you start with the list of tables listed on slide. You can likely find something there that you can use or build from for most PPM purposes.

    How to customize a table (1 of 3)

    You won’t necessarily need to customize a table, but if you do here are some steps to help you get familiar with the basics.

    Screenshot of the 'Columns' tab, open in the 'msdyn_project table' in 'Power Apps'.

    In this screenshot, we are clicked into the msdyn_project (display name: Project) table. As you can see, there are a series of tabs below the name of the table, and we are clicked into the Columns tab. This is where you can see all of the data points included in the table.

    You are not able to customize all columns. If a column that you are not able to customize does not meet your needs, you will need to create a custom column from the “+Add column” option.

    “Required” or “Optional” status pertains to when the column or field is used within your app. For customizable or custom columns this status can be set when you click into each column.

    How to customize a table (2 of 3)

    Create a custom “Status” column.

    By way of illustrating how you might need to customize a table, we’ll highlight the “msdyn_project_statecode” (display name: Project Status) column that comes preloaded in the Project (msdyn_project) table.

    • The Project Status column only gives you a binary choice. While you are able to customize what that binary choice is (it comes preloaded with “Active” and “Inactive” as the options) you cannot add additional choices – so you cannot set it to red/yellow/green, the most universally adopted options for status in the project portfolio management world.
    • Because of this, let’s look at the effort involved in creating a choice and adding a custom column to your table based upon that choice.
    Screenshots of the '+New choice' button in the 'Choices' tab and the 'New choice' pane that opens when you click it.

    From within the Choices tab, click “+New choice” option to create a custom choice.

    A pane will appear to the right of your screen. From there you can give your choice a name, and under the “Items” header, add your list of options.

    Click save. Your custom choice is now saved to the Choices tab in the Dataverse environment and can be used in your table. Further customizations can be made to your choice if need be.

    How to customize a table (3 of 3)

    Back in the Tables tab, you can put your new choice to work by adding a column to a table and selecting your custom choice.

    Screenshots of the pop-up window that appear when you click '+Add Column', and details of what happens when you select the data type 'Choice'.

    Start by selecting “+ Add Column” at the top left-hand side of your table. A window will appear on the right-hand side of the page, and you will have options to name your column and choose the data type.

    As you can see in this screenshot to the left, data type options include text, number and date types, and many more. Because we are looking to use our custom choice for this example, we are going to choose “Choice.”

    When you select “Choice” as your data type, all of the choice options available or created in your Dataverse environment will appear. Find your custom choice – in this example the one name “RYG Status” – and click done. When the window closes, be sure to select “Save Table.”

    How to develop a Form based upon your table (1 of 3 – open the form editor)

    A form is the interface users will engage with when using your Project app.

    When the Project app is first installed in your environment, the main user form will be lacking, with only a few basic data options.

    This form can be customized and additional tabs can be added to your user interface.

    1. To do this, go to the table you want to customize.
    2. In the horizontal series of tabs at the top of the screen, below the table title select the “Forms” option.
    3. Click on the main information option or select Edit Form for the form with “Main” under its form type. A new window will open where you can customize your form.
    Screenshot of the 'Forms' tab, open in the 'msdyn_project' table in 'Power Apps'.

    Select the Forms tab.

    Start with the form that has “Main” as its Format Type.

    How to develop a Form based upon your table (2 of 3 – add a component)

    Screenshot of the 'Components' window in 'Power Apps' with a list of layouts as a window to the right of the main screen where you can name and format the chosen layout.

    You can add element like columns or sections to your form by selecting the Components window.

    In this example, we are adding a 1-Column section. When you select that option from the menu options on the left of the screen, a window will open to the right of the screen where you can name and format the section.

    Choose the component you would like to add from the layout options. Depending on the table element you are looking to use, you can also add input options like number inputs and star ratings and pull in related data elements like a project timeline.

    How to develop a Form based upon your table (3 of 3 – add table columns)

    Screenshot of the 'Table Columns' window in 'Power Apps' and instructions for adding table columns.

    If you click on the “Table Columns” option on the left-hand pane, all of the column options from within your table will appear in alphabetical order.

    When clicked within the form section you would like to add the new column to, select the column from the list of option in the left-hand pane. The new data point will appear within the section. You can order and format section elements as you would like.

    When you are done editing the form, click the “Save” icon in the top right-hand corner. If you are ready for your changes to go live within your Project App, select the “Publish” icon in the top right-hand corner. Your updated form will go live within all of the apps that use it.

    The good and the bad of extending Project for the web

    The content in this step has not instructed users how to extend PFTW; rather, it has covered three basic core pieces of Power Apps that those interesting in PFTW need to be aware of: Dataverse environments, the Power Apps and Sitemaps Designers, and Tables and associated Forms.

    Because we have only covered the very tip of the iceberg, those interested in going further and taking a DIY approach to extending PFTW will need to build upon these basics to unlock further functionality. Indeed, it takes work to develop the product into something that begins to resemble a viable enterprise project and portfolio management solution. Here are some of the good and the bad elements associated with that work:

    The Good:

    • You can right-size and purpose build: add as much or as little project management rigor as your process requires. Related, you can customize the solution in multiple ways to suit the needs of specific business units or portfolios.
    • Speed to market: it is possible to get up and running quickly with a minimum-viable product.

    The Bad:

    • Work required: to build anything beyond MVP requires independent research and trial and error.
    • Time required: to build anything beyond MVP requires time and skills that many PMOs don’t have.
    • Shadow support costs: ungoverned app creation could have negative support and maintenance impacts across IT.

    "The move to Power Platform and low code development will […increase] maintenance overhead. Will low code solution hit problems at scale? [H]ow easy will it be to support hundreds or thousands of small applications?

    I can hear the IT support desks already complaining at the thought of this. This part of the puzzle is yet to hit real world realities of support because non developers are busy creating lots of low code applications." (Ben Hosking, Software Developer and Blogger, "Why low code software development is eating the world")

    Quick start your extension with the Accelerator

    For those starting out, there is a pre-built app you can import into your environment to extend the Project for the web app without any custom development.

    • If the DIY approach in the previous slides was overwhelming, and you don’t have the budget for a MS Partner route in the near-term, this doesn’t mean that evolving your Project for the web app is unattainable.
    • Thanks to a partnership between OnePlan (one of the MS Gold Partners we detail in the next step) and Microsoft, Project for the web users have access to a free resource to help them evolve the base Project app. It’s called the “Project for the web Accelerator” (commonly referred to as “the Accelerator” for short).
    • Users interested in learning more about, and accessing, this free resource should refer to the links below:
      1. The Future of Microsoft Project Online (source: OnePlan).
      2. Introducing the Project Accelerator (source: Microsoft).
      3. Project for the web Accelerator (source: GitHub)
    Screen shot from one of the dashboards that comes with the Accelerator (image source: GitHub).

    2.1.1 Perform a feasibility test (1 of 2)

    15 mins

    As we’ve suggested, and as the material in this step indicates, extending PFTW in a DIY fashion is not small task. You need a knowledge of the Dataverse and Power Apps, and access to the requisite skills, time, and resources to develop the solution.

    To determine whether your PMO and organization are ready to go it alone in extending PFTW, perform the following activity:

    1. Convene a collection of portfolio, project, and PMO staff.
    2. Using the six-question survey on tab 5 of the Microsoft Project & M365 Licensing Tool (see screenshot to the right) as a jumping off point for a discussion, consider the readiness of your PMO or project organization to undertake a DIY approach to extending and implementing PFTW at this time.
    3. You can use the recommendations on tab 5 of the Microsoft Project & 365 Licensing Tool to inform your next steps, and input the gauge graphic in section 4 of the Microsoft Project & M365 Action Plan Template.
    Screenshots from the 'Project for the Web Extensibility Feasibility Test'.

    Go to tab 5 of the Microsoft Project & M365 Licensing Tool

    See next slide for additional activity details

    2.1.1 Perform a feasibility test (2 of 2)

    Input: The contents of this step, The Project for the Web Extensibility Feasibility Test (tab 5 in the Microsoft Project & 365 Licensing Tool)

    Output: Initial recommendations on whether to proceed and how to proceed with a DIY approach to extending Project for the web

    Materials: The Project for the Web Extensibility Feasibility Test (tab 5 in the Microsoft Project & 365 Licensing Tool)

    Participants: Portfolio Manager (PMO Director), Project Managers, Other relevant PMO stakeholders

    Step 2.2

    Assess the Microsoft Gold Partner Community

    Activities

    • Review what to look for in a Microsoft Partner
    • Determine whether your needs would benefit from reaching out to a Microsoft Partner
    • Review three key Partners from the North American market
    • Create a Partner outreach plan

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Review what to look for in a Microsoft Partner.
    • Determine whether your needs would benefit from reaching out to a Microsoft Partner.
    • Review three key Partners from the North American market.

    This step usually involves the following participants:

    • Portfolio Manager (PMO Director)
    • Project Managers
    • Other relevant PMO stakeholders

    Outcomes of Step

    • A better understanding of MS Partners
    • A Partner outreach plan

    You don’t have to go it alone

    Microsoft has an established community of Partners who can help in your customizations and implementations of Project for the web and other MS Project offerings.

    If the content in the previous step seemed too technical or overly complex in a way that scared you away from a DIY approach to extending Microsoft’s latest project offering (and at some point in the near future, soon to be its only project offering), Project for the web, fear not.

    You do not have to wade into the waters of extending Project for the web alone, or for that matter, in implementing any other MS Project solution.

    Instead, Microsoft nurtures a community of Silver and Gold partners who offer hands-on technical assistance and tool implementation services. While the specific services provided vary from partner to partner, all can assist in the customization and implementation of any of Microsoft’s Project offerings.

    In this step we will cover what to look for in a Partner and how to assess whether you are a good candidate for the services of a Partner. We will also highlight three Partners from within the North American market.

    The basics of the Partner community

    What is a Microsoft Partner?

    Simply put, an MS Gold Partner is a software or professional services organization that provides sales and services related to Microsoft products.

    They’re resellers, implementors, integrators, software manufacturers, trainers, and virtually any other technology-related business service.

    • Microsoft has for decades opted out of being a professional services organization, outside of its very “leading edge” offerings from MCS (Microsoft Consulting Services) for only those technologies that are so new that they aren’t yet supported by MS Partners.
    • As you can see in the chart on the next slide, to become a silver or gold certified partner, firms must demonstrate expertise in specific areas of business and technology in 18 competency areas that are divided into four categories: applications and infrastructure, business applications, data and AI, and modern workplace and security.

    More information on what it takes to become a Microsoft Partner:

    1. Partner Center (Document Center, Microsoft)
    2. Differentiate your business by attaining Microsoft competencies (Document Center, Microsoft)
    3. Partner Network Homepage (Webpage, Microsoft)
    4. See which partner offer is right for you (Webpage, Microsoft)

    Types of partnerships and qualifications

    Microsoft Partner Network

    Microsoft Action Pack

    Silver Competency

    Gold Competency

    What is it?

    The Microsoft Partner Network (MPN) is a community that offers members tools, information, and training. Joining the MPN is an entry-level step for all partners. The Action Pack is an annual subscription offered to entry-level partners. It provides training and marketing materials and access to expensive products and licenses at a vastly reduced price. Approximately 5% of firms in the Microsoft Partner Network (MPN) are silver partners. These partners are subject to audits and annual competency exams to maintain silver status. Approximately 1% of firms in the Microsoft Partner Network (MPN) are gold partners. These partners are subject to audits and annual competency exams to maintain Gold status.

    Requirements

    Sign up for a membership Annual subscription fee While requirements can vary across competency area, broadly speaking, to become a silver partner firms must:
    • Pass regular exams and skills assessments, with at least two individuals on staff with Microsoft Certified Professional Status.
    • Hit annual customer, revenue, and licensing metrics.
    • Pay the annual subscription fee.
    While requirements can vary across competency area, broadly speaking, to become a gold partner firms must:
    • Pass regular exams and skills assessments, with at least two individuals on staff with Microsoft Certified Professional Status.
    • Hit annual customer, revenue, and licensing metrics.
    • Pay the annual subscription fee.

    Annual Fee

    No Cost $530 $1800 $5300

    When would a MS Partner be helpful?

    • Project management and portfolio management practitioners might look into procuring the services of a Microsoft Partner for a variety of reasons.
    • Because services vary from partner to partner (help to extend Project for the web, implement Project Server or Project Online, augment PMO staffing, etc.) we won’t comment on specific needs here.
    • Instead, the three most common conditions that trigger the need are listed to the right.

    Speed

    When you need to get results faster than your staff can grow the needed capabilities.

    Cost

    When the complexity of the purchase decision, implementation, communication, training, configuration, and/or customization cannot be cost-justified for internal staff, often because you’ll only do it once.

    Expertise & Skills

    When your needs cannot be met by the core Microsoft technology without significant extension or customization.

    Canadian Microsoft Partners Spotlight

    As part of our research process for this blueprint, Info-Tech asked Microsoft Canada for referrals and introductions to leading Microsoft Partners. We spent six months collaborating with them on fresh research into the underlying platform.

    These vendors are listed below and are highlighted in subsequent slides.

    Spotlighted Partners:

    Logo for One Plan. Logo for PMO Outsource Ltd. Logo for Western Principles.

    Please Note: While these vendors were referred to us by Microsoft Canada and have a footprint in the Canadian market, their footprints extend beyond this to the North American and global markets.

    A word about our approach

    Photo of Barry Cousins, Project Portfolio Management Practice Lead, Info-Tech Research Group.
    Barry Cousins
    Project Portfolio Management Practice Lead
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Our researchers have been working with Microsoft Project Online and Microsoft Project Server clients for years, and it’s fair to say that most of these clients (at some point) used a Microsoft Partner in their deployment. They’re not really software products, per se; they’re platforms. As a Microsoft Partner in 2003 when Project Server got its first big push, I heard it loud and clear: “Some assembly required. You might only make 7% on the licensing, but the world’s your oyster for services.”

    In the past few years, Microsoft froze the market for major Microsoft Project decisions by making it clear that the existing offering is not getting updates while the new offering (Project for the web) doesn’t do what the old one did. And in a fascinating timing coincidence, the market substantially adopted Microsoft 365 during that period, which enables access to Project for the web.

    Many of Info-Tech’s clients are justifiably curious, confused, and concerned, while the Microsoft Partners have persisted in their knowledge and capability. So, we asked Microsoft Canada for referrals and introductions to leading Microsoft Partners and spent six months collaborating with them on fresh research into the underlying platform.

    Disclosure: Info-Tech conducted collaborative research with the partners listed on the previous slide to produce this publication. Market trends and reactions were studied, but the only clients identified were in case studies provided by the Microsoft Partners. Info-Tech’s customers have been, and remain, anonymous. (Barry Cousins, Project Portfolio Management Practice Lead, Info-Tech Research Group)

    MS Gold Partner Spotlight:

    OnePlan

    Logo for One Plan.
    Headquarters: San Marcos, California, and Toronto, Ontario
    Number of Employees: ~80
    Active Since: 2007 (as EPMLive)
    Website: www.oneplan.ai

    Who are they?

    • While the OnePlan brand has only been the marketplace for a few years, the company has been a major player in MS Gold Partner space for well over a decade.
    • Born out of EPMLive in the mid-aughts, OnePlan Solutions has evolved through a series of acquisitions, including Upland, Tivitie, and most recently Wicresoft.

    What do they do?

    • Software: Its recent rebranding is largely because OnePlan Solutions is as much a software company as it is a professional services firm. The OnePlan software product is an impressive solution that can be used on its own to facilitate the portfolio approaches outlined on the next slide and that can also integrate with the tools your organization is already using to manage tasks (see here for a full rundown of the solutions within the Microsoft stack and beyond OnePlan can integrate with).
    • Beyond its ability to integrate with existing solutions, as a software product, OnePlan has modules for resource planning, strategic portfolio planning, financial planning, time tracking, and more.

    • PPM Consulting Services: The OnePlan team also offers portfolio management consulting services. See the next slide for a list of its approaches to project portfolio management.

    Markets served

    • US, Canada, Europe, and Australia

    Channel Differentiation

    • OnePlan scales to all the PPM needs of all industry types.
    • Additionally, OnePlan offers insights and functionality specific to the needs of BioTech-Pharma.

    What differentiates OnePlan?

    • OnePlan co-developed the Project Accelerator for Project for the web with Microsoft. The OnePlan team’s involvement in developing the Accelerator and making it free for users to access suggests it is aligned to and has expertise in the purpose-built and collaborative vision behind Microsoft’s move away from Project Online and toward the Power Platform and Teams collaboration.
    • 2021 MS Gold Partner of the Year. At Microsoft’s recent Microsoft Inspire event, OnePlan was recognized as the Gold Partner of the Year for Project and Portfolio Management as well as a finalist for Power Apps and Power Automate.
    • OnePlan Approaches: Below is a list of the services or approaches to project portfolio management that OnePlan provides. See its website for more details.
      • Strategic Portfolio Management: Align work to objectives and business outcomes. Track performance against the proposed objectives outcomes.
      • Agile Portfolio Management: Implement Agile practices across the organization, both at the team and executive level.
      • Adaptive Portfolio Management: Allow teams to use the project methodology and tools that best suit the work/team. Maintain visibility and decision making across the entire portfolio.
      • Professional Services Automation: Use automation to operate with greater efficiency.

    "OnePlan offers a strategic portfolio, financial and resource management solution that fits the needs of every PMO. Optimize your portfolio, financials and resources enterprise wide." (Paul Estabrooks, Vice President at OnePlan)

    OnePlan Case Study

    This case study was provided to Info-Tech by OnePlan.

    Brambles

    INDUSTRY: Supply Chain & Logistics
    SOURCE: OnePlan

    Overview: Brambles plays a key role in the delivery or return of products amongst global trading partners such as manufacturers, distributors and retailers.

    Challenge

    Brambles had a variety of Project Management tools with no easy way of consolidating project management data. The proliferation of project management solutions was hindering the execution of a long-term business transformation strategy. Brambles needed certain common and strategic project management processes and enterprise project reporting while still allowing individual project management solutions to be used as part of the PPM platform.

    Solution

    As part of the PMO-driven business transformation strategy, Brambles implemented a project management “operating system” acting as a foundation for core processes such as project intake, portfolio management, resource, and financial planning and reporting while providing integration capability for a variety of tools used for project execution.

    OnePlan’s new Adaptive PPM platform, combining the use of PowerApps and OnePlan, gives Brambles the desired PPM operating system while allowing for tool flexibility at the execution level.

    Results

    • Comprehensive picture of progress across the portfolio.
    • Greater adoption by allowing flexibility of work management tools.
    • Modern portfolio management solution that enables leadership to make confident decision.

    Solution Details

    • OnePlan
    • Project
    • Power Apps
    • Power Automate
    • Power BI
    • Teams

    Contacting OnePlan Solutions

    www.oneplan.ai

    Joe Larscheid: jlarscheid@oneplan.ai
    Paul Estabrooks: pestabrooks@oneplan.ai
    Contact Us: contact@oneplan.ai
    Partners: partner@oneplan.ai

    Partner Resources. OnePlan facilitates regular ongoing live webinars on PPM topics that anyone can sign up for on the OnePlan website.

    For more information on upcoming webinars, or to access recordings of past webinars, see here.

    Additional OnePlan Resources

    1. How to Extend Microsoft Teams into a Collaborative Project, Portfolio and Work Management Solution (on-demand webinar, OnePlan’s YouTube channel)
    2. What Does Agile PPM Mean To The Modern PMO (on-demand webinar, OnePlan’s YouTube channel)
    3. OnePlan is fused with the Microsoft User Experience (blog article, OnePlan)
    4. Adaptive Portfolio Management Demo – Bringing Order to the Tool Chaos with OnePlan (product demo, OnePlan’s YouTube channel)
    5. How OnePlan is aligning with Microsoft’s Project and Portfolio Management Vision (blog article, OnePlan)
    6. Accelerating Office 365 Value with a Hybrid Project Portfolio Management Solution (product demo, OnePlan’s YouTube channel)

    MS Gold Partner Spotlight:

    PMO Outsource Ltd.

    Logo for PMO Outsource Ltd.

    Headquarters: Calgary, Alberta, and Mississauga, Ontario
    Website: www.pmooutsource.com

    Who are they?

    • PMO Outsource Ltd. is a Microsoft Gold Partner and PMI certified professional services firm based in Alberta and Ontario, Canada.
    • It offers comprehensive project and portfolio management offerings with a specific focus on project lifecycle management, including demand management, resource management, and governance and communication practices.

    What do they do?

    • Project Online and Power Platform Expertise. The PMO Outsource Ltd. team has extensive knowledge in both Microsoft’s old tech (Project Server and Desktop) and in its newer, cloud-based technologies (Project Online, Project for the web, the Power Platform, and Dynamics 365). As the case study in two slides demonstrates, PMO Outsource Ltd. Uses its in-depth knowledge of the Microsoft suite to help organizations automate project and portfolio data collection process, create efficiencies, and encourage cloud adoption.
    • PPM Consulting Services: In addition to its Microsoft platform expertise, the PMO Outsource Ltd. team also offers project and portfolio management consulting services, helping organizations evolve their process and governance structures as well as their approaches to PPM tooling.

    Markets served

    • Global

    Channel Differentiation

    • PMO Outsource Ltd. scales to all the PPM needs of all industry types.

    What differentiates PMO Outsource Ltd.?

    • PMO Staff Augmentation. In addition to its technology and consulting services, PMO Outsource Ltd. offers PMO staff augmentation services. As advertised on its website, it offers “scalable PMO staffing solutions. Whether you require Project Managers, Business Analysts, Admins or Coordinators, [PMO Outsource Ltd.] can fulfill your talent search requirements from a skilled pool of resources.”
    • Multiple and easy-to-understand service contract packages. PMO Outsource Ltd. offers many prepackaged service offerings to suit PMOs’ needs. Those packages include “PMO Management, Admin, and Support,” “PPM Solution, Site and Workflow Configuration,” and “Add-Ons.” For full details of what’s included in these services packages, see the PMO Outsource Ltd. website.
    • PMO Outsource Ltd. Services: Below is a list of the services or approaches to project portfolio management that PMO Outsource Ltd. Provides. See its website for more details.
      • Process Automation, Workflows, and Tools. Facilitate line of sight by tailoring Microsoft’s technology to your organization’s needs and creating custom workflows.
      • PMO Management Framework. Receive a professionally managed PPM methodology as well as governance standardization of processes, tools, and templates.
      • Custom BI Reports. Leverage its expertise in reporting and dashboarding to create the visibility your organization needs.

    "While selecting an appropriate PPM tool, the PMO should not only evaluate the standard industry tools but also analyze which tool will best fit the organization’s strategy, budget, and culture in the long run." (Neeta Manghnani, PMO Strategist, PMO Outsource Ltd.)

    PMO Outsource Ltd. Case Study

    This case study was provided to Info-Tech by PMO Outsource Ltd.

    SAMUEL

    INDUSTRY: Manufacturing
    SOURCE: PMO Outsource Ltd.

    Challenge

    • MS Project 2013 Server (Legacy/OnPrem)
    • Out-of-support application and compliance with Office 365
    • Out-of-support third-party application for workflows
    • No capability for resource management
    • Too many manual processes for data maintenance and server administration

    Solution

    • Migrate project data to MS Project Online
    • Recreate workflows using Power Automate solution
    • Configure Power BI content packs for Portfolio reporting and resource management dashboards
    • Recreate OLAP reports from legacy environment using Power BI
    • Cut down nearly 50% of administrative time by automating PMO/PPM processes
    • Save costs on Server hardware/application maintenance by nearly 75%

    Full Case Study Link

    • For full details about how PMO Outsource Ltd. assisted Samuel in modernizing its solution and creating efficiencies, visit the Microsoft website where this case study is highlighted.

    Contacting PMO Outsource Ltd.

    www.pmooutsource.com

    700 8th Ave SW, #108
    Calgary, AB T2P 1H2
    Telephone : +1 (587) 355-3745
    6045 Creditview Road, #169
    Mississauga, ON L5V 0B1
    Telephone : +1 (289) 334-1228
    Information: info@pmooutsource.com
    LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/pmo-outsource/

    Partner Resources. PMO Outsource Ltd.’s approach is rooted within a robust and comprehensive PPM framework that is focused on driving strategic outcomes and business success.

    For a full overview of its PPM framework, see here.

    Additional PMO Outsource Ltd. Resources

    1. 5 Benefits of PPM tools and PMO process automation (blog article, PMO Outsource Ltd.)
    2. Importance of PMO (blog article, PMO Outsource Ltd.)
    3. Meet the Powerful and Reimagined PPM tool for Everyone! (video, PMO Outsource Ltd. LinkedIn page)
    4. MS Project Tips: How to add #Sprints to an existing Project? (video, PMO Outsource Ltd. LinkedIn page)
    5. MS Project Tips: How to add a milestone to your project? (video, PMO Outsource Ltd. LinkedIn page)
    6. 5 Benefits of implementing Project Online Tools (video, PMO Outsource Ltd. LinkedIn page)

    MS Gold Partner Spotlight:

    Western Principles

    Logo for Western Principles.

    Headquarters: Vancouver, British Columbia
    Years Active: 16 Years
    Website: www.westernprinciples.com

    Who are they?

    • Western Principles is a Microsoft Gold Partner and UMT 360 PPM software provider based in British Columbia with a network of consultants across Canada.
    • In the last sixteen years, it has successfully conducted over 150 PPM implementations, helping in the implementation, training, and support of Microsoft Project offerings as well as UMT360 – a software solution provider that, much like OnePlan, enhances the PPM capabilities of the Microsoft platform.

    What do they do?

    • Technology expertise. The Western Principles team helps organizations maximize the value they are getting form the Microsoft Platform. Not only does it offer expertise in all the solutions in the MS Project ecosystem, it also helps organizations optimize their use and understanding of Teams, SharePoint, the Power Platform, and more. In addition to the Microsoft platform, Western Principles is partnered with many other technology providers, including UMT360 for strategic portfolio management, the Simplex Group for project document controls, HMS for time sheets, and FluentPro for integration, back-ups, and migrations.
    • PPM Consulting Services: In addition to its technical services and solutions, Western Principles offers PPM consulting and staff augmentation services.

    Markets served

    • Canada

    Channel Differentiation

    • Western Principles scales to all the PPM needs of all industry types, public and private sector.
    • In addition, its website offers persona-specific information based on the PPM needs of engineering and construction, new product development, marketing, and more.

    What differentiates Western Principles?

    • Gold-certified UMT 360 partner. In addition to being a Microsoft Gold Partner, Western Principles is a gold-certified UMT 360 partner. UMT 360 is a strategic portfolio management tool that integrates with many other work management solutions to offer holistic line of sight into the organization’s supply-demand pain points and strategic portfolio management needs. Some of the solutions UMT 360 integrates with include Project Online and Project for the web, Azure DevOps, Jira, and many more. See here for more information on the impressive functionality in UMT360.
    • Sustainment Services. Adoption can be the bane of most PPM tool implementations. Among the many services Western Principles offers, its “sustainment services” stand out. According to Western Principles’ website, these services are addressed to those who require “continual maintenance, change, and repair activities” to keep PPM systems in “good working order” to help maximize ROI.
    • Western Principles Services: In addition to the above, below is a list of some of the services that Western Principles offers. See its website for a full list of services.
      • Process Optimization: Determine your requirements and process needs.
      • Integration: Create a single source of truth.
      • Training: Ensure your team knows how to use the systems you implement.
      • Staff Augmentation: Provide experienced project team members based upon your needs.

    "One of our principles is to begin with the end in mind. This means that we will work with you to define a roadmap to help you advance your strategic portfolio … and project management capabilities. The roadmap for each customer is different and based on where you are today, and where you need to get to." (Western Principles, “Your Strategic Portfolio Management roadmap,” Whitepaper)

    Contacting Western Principles

    www.westernprinciples.com

    610 – 700 West Pender St.
    Vancouver, BC V6C 1G8
    +1 (800) 578-4155
    Information: info@westernprinciples.com
    LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/western-principle...

    Partner Resources. Western Principles provides a multitude of current case studies on its home page. These case studies let you know what the firm is working on this year and the type of support it provides to its clientele.

    To access these case studies, see here.

    Additional Western Principles Resources

    1. Program and Portfolio Roll ups with Microsoft Project and Power BI (video, Western Principles YouTube Channel)
    2. Dump the Spreadsheets for Microsoft Project Online (video, Western Principles YouTube Channel)
    3. Power BI for Project for the web (video, Western Principles YouTube Channel)
    4. How to do Capacity Planning and Resource Management in Microsoft Project Online [Part 1 & Part 2] (video, Western Principles YouTube Channel)
    5. Extend & Integrate Microsoft Project (whitepaper, Western Principles)
    6. Your COVID-19 Return-to-Work Plan (whitepaper, Western Principles)

    Watch Info-Tech’s Analyst-Partner Briefing Videos to lean more

    Info-Tech was able to sit down with the partners spotlighted in this step to discuss the current state of the PPM market and Microsoft’s place within it.

    • All three partners spotlighted in this step contributed to Info-Tech’s research process for this publication.
    • For two of the partners, OnePlan and PMO Outsource Ltd., Info-Tech was able to record a conversation where our analysts and the partners discuss Microsoft’s current MS Project offerings, the current state of the PPM tool market, and the services and the approaches of each respective partner.
    • A third video briefing with Western Principles has not happened yet due to logistical reasons. We are hoping we can include a video chat with our peers at Western Principles in the near future.
    Screenshot form the Analyst-Partner Briefing Videos. In addition to the content covered in this step, you can use these videos for further information about the partners to inform your next steps.

    Download Info-Tech’s Analyst-Partner Briefing Videos (OnePlan & PMO Outsource Ltd.)

    2.2.1 Create a partner outreach plan

    1-3 hours

    Input: Contents of this step, List of additional MS Gold Partners

    Output: A completed partner outreach program

    Materials: MS Project & M365 Action Plan Template

    Participants: Portfolio Manager (PMO Director), PMO Admin Team, Project Managers, CIO

    1. With an understanding of the partner ecosystem, compile a working group of PMO peers and stakeholders to produce a gameplan for engaging the MS Gold Partner ecosystem.
      • For additional partner options see Microsoft’s Partner Page.
    2. Using slide 20 in Info-Tech’s MS Project and M365 Action Plan Template, document the Partners you would want or have scheduled briefings with.
      • As you go through the briefings and research process, document the pros and cons and areas of specialized associated with each vendor for your particular work management implementation.

    Download the Microsoft Project & M365 Action Plan Template

    2.2.2 Document your PM and PPM requirements

    1-3 hours

    Input: Project Portfolio Management Maturity Assessment, Project Management Maturity Assessment

    Output: MS Project & M365 Action Plan Template

    Materials: Project Portfolio Management Maturity Assessment, Project Management Maturity Assessment, MS Project & M365 Action Plan Template

    Participants: Portfolio Manager (PMO Director), PMO Admin Team, Project Managers, CIO

    1. As you prepare to engage the Partner Community, you should have a sense of where your project management and project portfolio management gaps are to better communicate your tooling needs.
    2. Leverage tab 4 from both your Project Portfolio Management Assessment and Project Management Assessment from step 1.3 of this blueprint to help document and communicate your requirements. Those tabs prioritize your project and portfolio management needs by highest impact for the organization.
    3. You can use the outputs of the tab to inform your inputs on slide 23 of the MS Project & M365 Action Plan Template to present to organizational stakeholders and share with the Partners you are briefing with.

    Download the Microsoft Project & M365 Action Plan Template

    Determine the Future of Microsoft Project for Your Organization

    Phase 3: Finalize Your Implementation Approach

    Phase 1: Determine Your Tool NeedsPhase 2: Weigh Your Implementation Options

    Phase 3: Finalize Your Implementation Approach

    • Step 1.1: Survey the M365 work management landscape
    • Step 1.2: Perform a process maturity assessment to help inform your M365 starting point
    • Step 1.3: Consider the right MS Project licenses for your stakeholders
    • Step 2.1: Get familiar with extending Project for the web using Power Apps
    • Step 2.2: Assess the MS Gold Partner Community
    • Step 3.1: Prepare an action plan

    Phase Outcomes

    An action plan concerning what to do with MS Project and M365 for your PMO or project organization.

    Step 3.1

    Prepare an action plan

    Activities

    • Compile the current state results
    • Prepare an Implementation Roadmap
    • Complete your presentation deck

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Assess the impact of organizational change for the project
    • Develop your vision for stakeholders
    • Compile the current state results and document the implementation approach
    • Create clarity through a RACI and proposed implementation timeline

    This step usually involves the following participants:

    • Portfolio Manager (PMO Director)
    • PMO Admin Team
    • Business Analysts
    • Project Managers

    Outcomes of Step

    • Microsoft Project and M365 Action Plan

    Assess the impact of organizational change

    Be prepared to answer: “What’s in it for me?”

    Before jumping into licensing and third-party negotiations, ensure you’ve clearly assessed the impact of change.

    Tailor the work effort involved in each step, as necessary:

    1. Assess the impact
      • Use the impact assessment questions to identify change impacts.
    2. Plan for change
      • Document the impact on each stakeholder group.
      • Anticipate their response.
      • Curate a compelling message for each stakeholder group.
      • Develop a communication plan.
    3. Act according to plan
      • Identify your executive sponsor.
      • Enable the sponsor to drive change communication.
      • Coach managers on how they can drive change at the individual level.

    Impact Assessment Questions

    • Will the change impact how our clients/customers receive, consume, or engage with our products/services?
    • Will there be a price increase?
    • Will there be a change to compensation and/or rewards?
    • Will the vision or mission of the job change?
    • Will the change span multiple locations/time zones?
    • Are multiple products/services impacted by this change?
    • Will staffing levels change?
    • Will this change increase the workload?
    • Will the tools of the job be substantially different?
    • Will a new or different set of skills be needed?
    • Will there be a change in reporting relationships?
    • Will the workflow and approvals be changed?
    • Will there be a substantial change to scheduling and logistics?

    Master Organizational Change Management Practices blueprint

    Develop your vision for stakeholders

    After careful analysis and planning, it’s time to synthesize your findings to those most impacted by the change.

    Executive Brief

    • Prepare a compelling message about the current situation.
    • Outline the considerations the working group took into account when developing the action plan.
    • Succinctly describe the recommendations proposed by the working group.

    Goals

    • Identify the goals for the project.
    • Explain the details for each goal to develop the organizational rationale for the project.
    • These goals are the building blocks for the change communication that the executive sponsor will use to build a coalition of sponsors.

    Future State Vision

    • Quantify the high-level costs and benefits of moving forward with this project.
    • Articulate the future- state maturity level for both the project and project portfolio management process.
    • Reiterate the organizational rationale and drivers for change.

    "In failed transformations, you often find plenty of plans, directives, and programs, but no vision…A useful rule of thumb: If you can’t communicate the vision to someone in five minutes or less and get a reaction that signifies both understanding and interest, you are not yet done…" (John P. Kotter, Leading Change)

    Get ready to compile the analysis completed throughout this blueprint in the subsequent activities. The outputs will come together in your Microsoft Project and M365 Action Plan.

    Use the Microsoft Project & M365 Action Plan Template to help communicate your vision

    Our boardroom-ready presentation and communication template can be customized using the outputs of this blueprint.

    • Getting stakeholders to understand why you are recommending specific work management changes and then communicating exactly what those changes are and what they will cost is key to the success of your work management implementation.
    • To that end, the slides ahead walk you through how to customize the Microsoft Project & M365 Action Plan Template.
    • Many of the current-state analysis activities you completed during phase 1 of this blueprint can be directly made use of within the template as can the decisions you made and requirements you documented during phase 2.
    • By the end of this step, you will have a boardroom-ready presentation that will help you communicate your future-state vision.
    Screenshot of Info-Tech's Microsoft Project and M365 Action Plan Template with a note to 'Update the presentation or distribution date and insert your name, role, and organization'.

    Download Info-Tech’s Microsoft Project & M365 Action Plan Template

    3.1.1 Compile current state results

    1-3 hours

    Input: Force Field Analysis Tool, Tool Audit Workbook, Project Management Maturity Assessment Tool, Project Portfolio Management Maturity Assessment Tool

    Output: Section 1: Executive Brief, Section 2: Context and Constraints

    Materials: Microsoft Project and M365 Action Plan Template

    Participants: PMO Director, PMO Admin Team, Business Analysts, Project Managers

    1. As a group, review the results of the tools introduced throughout this blueprint. Use this information along with organizational knowledge to document the business context and current state.
    2. Update the driving forces for change and risks and constraints slides using your outputs from the Force Field Analysis Tool.
    3. Update the current tool landscape, tool satisfaction, and tool audit results slides using your outputs from the Tool Audit Workbook.
    4. Update the gap analysis results slides using your outputs from the Project Management and Project Portfolio Management Maturity Assessment Tools.

    Screenshots of 'Business Context and Current State' screen from the 'Force Field Analysis Tool', the 'Tool Audit Results' screen from the 'Tool Audit Workbook', and the 'Project Portfolio Management Gap Analysis Results' screen from the 'PM and PPM Maturity Assessments Tool'.

    Download the Microsoft Project & M365 Action Plan Template

    3.2.1 Option A: Prepare a DIY roadmap

    1-3 hours; Note: This is only applicable if you have chosen the DIY route

    Input: List of key PPM decision points, List of who is accountable for PPM decisions, List of who has PPM decision-making authority

    Output: Section 3: DIY Implementation Approach

    Materials: Microsoft Project and M365 Action Plan Template

    Participants: PMO Director, PMO Admin Team, Business Analysts, Project Managers

    1. As a group, review the results of the Microsoft Project and M365 Licensing Tool. Use this information along with organizational knowledge and discussion with the working group to complete Section 3: DIY Implementation Approach.
    2. Copy and paste your results from tab 5 of the Microsoft Project and M365 Licensing Tool. Update the Implementation Approach slide to detail the rationale for selecting this option.
    3. Update the Action Plan to articulate the details for total and annual costs of the proposed licensing solution.
    4. Facilitate a discussion to determine roles and responsibilities for the implementation. Based on the size, risk, and complexity of the implementation, create a reasonable timeline.
    Screenshots from the 'Microsoft Project and M365 Action Plan Template' outlining the 'DIY Implementation Approach'.

    Download the Microsoft Project and M365 Action Plan Template

    3.2.1 Option b: Prepare a Partner roadmap

    1-3 hours; Note: This is only applicable if you have chosen the Partner route

    Input: Microsoft Project and M365 Licensing Tool, Information on Microsoft Partners

    Output: Section 4: Microsoft Partner Implementation Route

    Materials: Microsoft Project and M365 Action Plan Template

    Participants: PMO Director, PMO Admin Team, Business Analysts, Project Managers

    1. As a group, review the results of the Microsoft Project and M365 Licensing Tool. Use this information along with organizational knowledge and discussion with the working group to complete Section 4: Microsoft Partner Implementation Route.
    2. Copy and paste your results from tab 5 of the Microsoft Project and M365 Licensing Tool. Update the Implementation Approach slide to detail the rationale for selecting this option.
    3. Develop an outreach plan for the Microsoft Partners you are planning to survey. Set targets for briefing dates and assign an individual to own any back-and-forth communication. Document the pros and cons of each Partner and gauge interest in continuing to analyze the vendor as a possible solution.
    4. Facilitate a discussion to determine roles and responsibilities for the implementation. Based on the size, risk, and complexity of the implementation, create a reasonable timeline.

    Screenshots from the 'Microsoft Project and M365 Action Plan Template' outlining the 'Microsoft Partner Implementation Route'.

    Microsoft Project and M365 Action Plan Template

    3.1.2 Complete your presentation deck

    1-2 hours

    Input: Outputs from the exercises in this blueprint

    Output: Section 5: Future-State Vision and Goals

    Materials: Microsoft Project and M365 Action Plan Template

    Participants: PMO Director, PMO Admin Team, Business Analysts, Project Managers

    1. Put the finishing touches on your presentation deck by documenting your future- state vision and goals.
    2. Prepare to present to your stakeholders.
      • Understand your audience, their needs and priorities, and their degree of knowledge and experiences with technology. This informs what to include in your presentation and how to position the message and goal.
    3. Review the deck beginning to end and check for spelling, grammar, and vertical logic.
    4. Practice delivering the vision for the project through several practice sessions.

    Screenshots from the 'Microsoft Project and M365 Action Plan Template' regarding finishing touches.

    Microsoft Project and M365 Action Plan Template

    Pitch your vision to key stakeholders

    There are multiple audiences for your pitch, and each audience requires a different level of detail when addressed. Depending on the outcomes expected from each audience, a suitable approach must be chosen. The format and information presented will vary significantly from group to group.

    Audience

    Key Contents

    Outcome

    Business Executives

    • Section 1: Executive Brief
    • Section 2: Context and Constraints
    • Section 5: Future-State Vision and Goals
    • Identify executive sponsor

    IT Leadership

    • Sections 1-5 with a focus on Section 3 or 4 depending on implementation approach
    • Get buy-in on proposed project
    • Identify skills or resourcing constraints

    Business Managers

    • Section 1: Executive Brief
    • Section 2: Context and Constraints
    • Section 5: Future-State Vision and Goals
    • Get feedback on proposed plan
    • Identify any unassessed risks and organizational impacts

    Business Users

    • Section 1: Executive Brief
    • Support the organizational change management process

    Summary of Accomplishment

    Problem Solved

    Knowledge Gained
    • How you work: Work management and the various ways of working (personal and team task management, strategic project portfolio management, formal project management, and enterprise project and portfolio management).
    • Where you need to go: Project portfolio management and project management current- and target-state maturity levels.
    • What you need: Microsoft Project Plans and requisite M365 licensing.
    • The skills you need: Extending Project for the web.
    • Who you need to work with: Get to know the Microsoft Gold Partner community.
    Deliverables Completed
    • M365 Tool Guides
    • Tool Audit Workbook
    • Force Field Analysis Tool
    • Project Portfolio Management Maturity Assessment Tool
    • Project Management Maturity Assessment Tool
    • Microsoft Project & M365 Action Plan Template

    If you would like additional support, have our analysts guide you through other phases as part of an Info-Tech workshop

    Contact your account representative for more information
    workshops@infotech.com
    1-888-670-8889

    Additional Support

    If you would like additional support, have our analysts guide you through other phases as part of an Info-Tech Workshop.

    Photo of Barry Cousins.
    Contact your account representative for more information
    workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8889

    To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.

    Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech’s historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    Perform a work management tool audit

    Gain insight into the tools that drive value or fail to drive value across your work management landscape with a view to streamline the organization’s tool ecosystem.

    Prepare an action plan for your tool needs

    Prepare the right work management tool recommendations for your IT teams and/or business units and develop a boardroom-ready presentation to communicate needs and next steps.

    Research Contributors and Experts

    Neeta Manghnani
    PMO Strategist
    PMO Outsource Ltd.

    Photo of Neeta Manghnani, PMO Strategist, PMO Outsource Ltd.
    • Innovative, performance-driven executive with significant experience managing Portfolios, Programs & Projects, and technical systems for international corporations with complex requirements. A hands-on, dynamic leader with over 20 years of experience guiding and motivating cross-functional teams. Highly creative and brings a blend of business acumen and expertise in multiple IT disciplines, to maximize the corporate benefit from capital investments.
    • Successfully deploys inventive solutions to automate processes and improve the functionality, scalability and security of critical business systems and applications. Leverages PMO/PPM management and leadership skills to meet the strategic goals and business initiatives.

    Robert Strickland
    Principal Consultant & Owner
    PMO Outsource Ltd.

    Photo of Robert Strickland, Principal Consultant and Owner, PMO Outsource Ltd.
    • Successful entrepreneur, leader, and technologist for over 15 years, is passionate about helping organizations leverage the value of SharePoint, O365, Project Online, Teams and the Power Platform. Expertise in implementing portals, workflows and collaboration experiences that create business value. Strategic manager with years of successful experience building businesses, developing custom solutions, delivering projects, and managing budgets. Strong transformational leader on large implementations with a technical pedigree.
    • A digital transformation leader helping clients move to the cloud, collaborate, automate their business processes and eliminate paper forms, spreadsheets and other manual practices.

    Related Info-Tech Research

    • Develop a Project Portfolio Management Strategy
      Time is money; spend it wisely.
    • Establish Realistic IT Resource Management Practices
      Holistically balance IT supply and demand to avoid overallocation.
    • Tailor Project Management Processes to Fit Your Projects
      Spend less time managing processes and more time delivering results

    Bibliography

    “13 Reasons not to use Microsoft Project.” Celoxis, 14 Sept. 2018. Accessed 17 Sept. 2021.

    Advisicon. “Project Online vs Project for the Web.” YouTube, 13 Nov. 2013. Accessed 17 Sept. 2021.

    Branscombe, Mary. “Is Project Online ready to replace Microsoft Project?” TechRepublic, 23 Jan. 2020. Accessed 17 Sept. 2021.

    Chemistruck, Dan. “The Complete Office 365 and Microsoft 365 Licensing Comparison.” Infused Innovations, 4 April 2019. Accessed 17 Sept. 2021.

    “Compare Project management solutions and costs.” Microsoft. Accessed 17 Sept. 2021.

    Day to Day Dynamics 365. “Microsoft Project for the web - Model-driven app.” YouTube, 29 Oct. 2019. Accessed 17 Sept. 2021.

    “Deploying Project for the web.” Microsoft, 24 Aug. 2021. Accessed 17 Sept. 2021.

    “Differentiate your business by attaining Microsoft competencies.” Microsoft, 26 Jan. 2021. Accessed 17 Sept. 2021.

    “Extend & Integrate Microsoft Project.” Western Principles. Accessed 17 Sept. 2021.

    “Get Started with Project Power App.” Microsoft. Accessed 17 Sept. 2021.

    Hosking, Ben. “Why low code software development is eating the world.” DevGenius, May 2021. Accessed 17 Sept. 2021.

    “How in the World is MS Project Still a Leading PM Software?” CBT Nuggets, 12 Nov. 2018. Accessed 17 Sept. 2021.

    Integent. “Project for the Web - Create a Program Entity and a model-driven app then expose in Microsoft Teams.” YouTube, 25 Mar. 2020. Accessed 17 Sept. 2021.

    “Introducing the Project Accelerator.” Microsoft, 10 Mar. 2021. Accessed 17 Sept. 2021.

    “Join the Microsoft Partner Network.” Microsoft. Accessed 17 Sept. 2021.

    Kaneko, Judy. “How Productivity Tools Can Lead to a Loss of Productivity.” Bluescape, 2 Mar. 2018 Accessed 17 Sept. 2021.

    Kotter, John. Leading Change. Harvard Business School Press, 1996.

    Leis, Merily. “What is Work Management.” Scoro. Accessed 17 Sept. 2021.

    Liu, Shanhong. “Number of Office 365 company users worldwide as of June 2021, by leading country.” Statistica, 2021. Web.

    Manghnani, Neeta. “5 Benefits of PPM tools and PMO process automation.” PMO Outsource Ltd., 11 Apr. 2021. Accessed 17 Sept. 2021.

    “Microsoft 365 and Office 365 plan options.” Microsoft, 31 Aug. 2021. Accessed 17 Sept. 2021.

    “Microsoft 365 for enterprise.” Microsoft. Accessed 17 Sept. 2021

    “Microsoft Office 365 Usage Statistics.” Thexyz blog, 18 Sept. 2020. Accessed 17 Sept. 2021.

    “Microsoft Power Apps, Microsoft Power Automate and Microsoft Power Virtual Agents Licensing Guide.” Microsoft, June 2021. Web.

    “Microsoft Project service description.” Microsoft, 31 Aug. 2021. Accessed 17 Sept. 2021.

    “Microsoft Project Statistics.” Integent Blog, 12 Dec. 2013. Accessed 17 Sept. 2021.

    Nanji, Aadil . Modernize Your Microsoft Licensing for the Cloud Era. Info-Tech Research Group, 12 Mar. 2020. Accessed 17 Sept. 2021.

    “Number of Office 365 company users worldwide as of June 2021, by leading country.” Statista, 8 June 2021. Accessed 17 Sept. 2021.

    “Overcoming disruption in a digital world.” Asana. Accessed 17 Sept. 2021.

    Pajunen, Antti. “Customizing and extending Project for the web.” Day to Day Dynamics 365, 20 Jan. 2020. Accessed 17 Sept. 2021.

    “Partner Center Documentation.” Microsoft. Accessed 17 Sept. 2021.

    Pragmatic Works. “Building First Power Apps Model Driven Application.” YouTube, 21 June 2019. Accessed 17 Sept. 2021.

    “Project architecture overview.” Microsoft, 27 Mar. 2020. Accessed 17 Sept. 2021.

    “Project for the web Accelerator.” GitHub. Accessed 17 Sept. 2021.

    “Project for the web admin help.” Microsoft, 28 Oct. 2019. Accessed 17 Sept. 2021.

    “Project for the Web – The New Microsoft Project.” TPG. Accessed 17 Sept. 2021.

    “Project for the Web Security Roles.” Microsoft, 1 July 2021. Accessed 17 Sept. 2021.

    “Project Online: Project For The Web vs Microsoft Project vs Planner vs Project Online.” PM Connection, 30 Nov. 2020. Accessed 17 Sept. 2021.

    Redmond, Tony. “Office 365 Insights from Microsoft’s FY21 Q2 Results.” Office 365 for IT Pros, 28 Jan. 2021. Accessed 17 Sept. 2021.

    Reimagine Project Management with Microsoft. “Advanced deployment for Project for the web.” YouTube, 4 Aug. 2021. Accessed 17 Sept. 2021.

    Reimagine Project Management with Microsoft. “Overview of Microsoft Project.” YouTube, 29 July 2021. Accessed 17 Sept. 2021.

    “See which partner offer is right for you.” Microsoft. Accessed 17 Sept. 2021.

    Shalomova, Anna. “Microsoft Project for Web 2019 vs. Project Online: What’s Best for Enterprise Project Management?” FluentPro, 23 July 2020. Accessed 17 Sept. 2021.

    Speed, Richard. “One Project to rule them all: Microsoft plots end to Project Online while nervous Server looks on.” The Register, 28 Sept. 2018. Accessed 17 Sept. 2021.

    Spataro, Jared. “A new vision for modern work management with Microsoft Project.” Microsoft, 25 Sept. 2018. Accessed 17 Sept. 2021.

    Stickel, Robert. “OnePlan Recognized as Winner of 2021 Microsoft Project & Portfolio Management Partner of the Year.” OnePlan, 8 July 2021. Accessed 17 Sept. 2021.

    Stickel, Robert. “The Future of Project Online.” OnePlan, 2 Mar. 2021. Accessed 17 Sept. 2021.

    Stickel, Robert. “What It Means to be Adaptive.” OnePlan, 24 May 2021. Accessed 17 Sept. 2021.

    “The Future of Microsoft Project Online.” OnePlan. Accessed 17 Sept. 2021.

    Weller, Joe. “Demystifying Microsoft Project Licensing.” Smartsheet, 10 Mar. 2016. Accessed 17 Sept. 2021.

    Western Principles Inc. “Dump the Spreadsheets for Microsoft Project Online.” YouTube, 2 July 2020. Accessed 17 Sept. 2021.

    Western Principles Inc. “Project Online or Project for the web? Which project management system should you use?” YouTube, 11 Aug. 2020. Accessed 17 Sept. 2021.

    “What is Power Query?” Microsoft, 22 July 2021. Web.

    Wicresoft. “The Power of the New Microsoft Project and Microsoft 365.” YouTube, 29 May 2020. Accessed 17 Sept. 2021.

    Wicresoft. “Why the Microsoft Power Platform is the Future of PPM.” YouTube, 11 June 2020. Accessed 17 Sept. 2021.

    Create a Horizontally Optimized SDLC to Better Meet Business Demands

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}149|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Development
    • Parent Category Link: /development
    • While teams are used to optimizing their own respective areas of responsibility, there is lack of clarity on the overall core SDLC process resulting in applications being released that are of poor quality.
    • Software development teams are struggling to release on time and within budget.
    • Teams do not understand the overall process, are not communicating well, and traceability is hard to achieve.
    • Each team claims to be optimized yet the final deliverable doesn’t reflect the expected quality.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Optimizing can make you worse. One cannot just optimize locally – the SDLC must be optimized in its entirety to ensure traceability across the process.
    • Separate process from framework.
      You don’t need to “Go Agile” or follow other industry jargon to effectively optimize your SDLC.
    • SDLC process improvement is ongoing.
      Start with your team’s current capabilities and optimize. You should set expectations that new improvements will always come in the future.

    Impact and Result

    • Use a systematic framework to bring out local optimizations as potential candidates for SDLC optimization.
    • Prioritize those candidates that will aid in optimizing the overall core SDLC process.
    • Create the necessary governance and control structures to sustain the changes.
    • Use Info-Tech tools and templates to accelerate your process optimization.

    Create a Horizontally Optimized SDLC to Better Meet Business Demands Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read this Executive Brief to understand Info-Tech's approach to SDLC optimization and why the SDLC must be optimized in its entirety to ensure traceability across the process.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Document the current state of the SDLC

    This phase of the blueprint will help in understanding the organization's business priorities, documenting the current SDLC process, and identifing current SDLC challenges.

    • Create a Horizontally Optimized SDLC to Better Meet Business Demands – Phase 1: Document the Current State of the SDLC
    • SDLC Optimization Playbook

    2. Define root causes, determine optimization initiatives, and define target state

    This phase of the blueprint, will help with defining root causes, determining potential optimization initiatives, and defining the target state of the SDLC.

    • Create a Horizontally Optimized SDLC to Better Meet Business Demands – Phase 2: Define Root Causes, Determine Optimization Initiatives, and Define Target State

    3. Develop a rollout strategy for SDLC optimization

    This phase of the blueprint will help with prioritizing initiatives in order to develop a rollout strategy, roadmap, and communication plan for the SDLC optimization.

    • Create a Horizontally Optimized SDLC to Better Meet Business Demands – Phase 3: Develop a Rollout Strategy for SDLC Optimization
    • SDLC Communication Template
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Create a Horizontally Optimized SDLC to Better Meet Business Demands

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Document Your Current SDLC

    The Purpose

    Understand SDLC current state.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Understanding of your current SDLC state and metrics to measure the success of your SDLC optimization initiative.

    Activities

    1.1 Document the key business objectives that your SDLC delivers upon.

    1.2 Document your current SDLC process using a SIPOC process map.

    1.3 Identify appropriate metrics in order to track the effectiveness of your SDLC optimization.

    1.4 Document the current state process flow of each SDLC phase.

    1.5 Document the control points and tools used within each phase.

    Outputs

    Documented business objectives

    Documented SIPOC process map

    Identified metrics to measure the effectiveness of your SDLC optimization

    Documented current state process flows of each SDLC phase

    Documented control points and tools used within each SDLC phase

    2 Assess Challenges and Define Root Causes

    The Purpose

    Understand current SDLC challenges and root causes.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Understand the core areas of your SDLC that require optimization.

    Activities

    2.1 Identify the current challenges that exist within each SDLC phase.

    2.2 Determine the root cause of the challenges that exist within each SDLC phase.

    Outputs

    Identified current challenges

    Identified root causes of your SDLC challenges

    3 Determine Your SDLC Optimization Initiatives

    The Purpose

    Understand common best practices and the best possible optimization initiatives to help optimize your current SDLC.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Understand the best ways to address your SDLC challenges.

    Activities

    3.1 Define optimization initiatives to address the challenges in each SDLC phase.

    Outputs

    Defined list of potential optimization initiatives to address SDLC challenges

    4 Define SDLC Target State

    The Purpose

    Define your SDLC target state while maintaining traceability across your overall SDLC process.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Understand what will be required to reach your optimized SDLC.

    Activities

    4.1 Determine the target state of your SDLC.

    4.2 Determine the people, tools, and control points necessary to achieve your target state.

    4.3 Assess the traceability between phases to ensure a seamlessly optimized SDLC.

    Outputs

    Determined SDLC target state

    Identified people, processes, and tools necessary to achieve target state

    Completed traceability alignment map and prioritized list of initiatives

    5 Prioritize Initiatives and Develop Rollout Strategy

    The Purpose

    Define how you will reach your target state.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Create a plan of action to achieve your desired target state.

    Activities

    5.1 Gain the full scope of effort required to implement your SDLC optimization initiatives.Gain the full scope of effort required to implement your SDLC optimization initiatives.

    5.2 Identify the enablers and blockers of your SDLC optimization.

    5.3 Define your SDLC optimization roadmap.

    5.4 Create a communication plan to share initiatives with the business.

    Outputs

    Level of effort required to implement your SDLC optimization initiatives

    Identified enablers and blockers of your SDLC optimization

    Defined optimization roadmap

    Completed communication plan to present your optimization strategy to stakeholders

    Next-Generation InfraOps

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}457|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Operations Management
    • Parent Category Link: /i-and-o-process-management
    • Traditional IT capabilities, activities, organizational structures, and culture need to adjust to leverage the value of cloud, optimize spend, and manage risk.
    • Different stakeholders across previously separate teams rely on one another more than ever, but rules of engagement do not yet exist.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • By defining your end goals and framing solutions based on the type of visibility and features you need, you can enable speed and reliability without losing control of the work.

    Impact and Result

    • Understand the xOps spectrum and what approaches benefit your organization.
    • Make sense of the architectural approaches and enablement tools available to you.
    • Evolve from just improving your current operations to a continuous virtuous cycle of development and deployment.

    Next-Generation InfraOps Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Next-Generation InfraOps Storyboard – A deck that will help you use Ops methodologies to build a virtuous cycle.

    This storyboard will help you understand the spectrum of different Agile xOps working modes and how best to leverage them and build an architecture and toolset that support rapid continuous IT operations

    • Next-Generation InfraOps Storyboard
    [infographic]

    Further reading

    Next-Generation InfraOps

    Embrace the spectrum of Ops methodologies to build a virtuous cycle.

    Executive summary

    Your Challenge

    IT Operations continue to be challenged by increasing needs for scale and speed, often in the face of constrained resources and time. For most, Agile methodologies have become a foundational part of tackling this problem. Since then, we've seen Agile evolve into DevOps, which started a trend into different categories of "xOps" that are too many to count. How does one make sense of the xOps spectrum? What is InfraOps and where does it fit in?

    Common Obstacles

    Ultimately, all these methodologies and approaches are there to serve the same purpose: increase effectiveness through automation and improve governance through visibility. The key is to understand what tools and methodologies will deliver actual benefits to your IT operation and to the organization as a whole.

    Info-Tech's Approach

    By defining your end goals and framing solutions based on the type of visibility and features you need, you can enable speed and reliability without losing control of the work.

    1. Understand the xOps spectrum and what approaches will benefit your organization.
    2. Make sense of the architectural approaches and enablement tools available to you.
    3. Evolve from just improving your current operations to a continuous virtuous cycle of development and deployment.

    Info-Tech Insight

    InfraOps, when applied well, should be the embodiment of the governance policies as expressed by standards in architecture and automation.

    Project overview

    Understand the xOps spectrum

    There are as many different types of "xOps" as there are business models and IT teams. To pick the approaches that deliver the best value to your organization and that align to your way of operating, it's important to understand the different major categories in the spectrum and how they do or don't apply to your IT approach.

    How to optimize the Ops in DevOps

    InfraOps is one of the major methodologies to address a key problem in IT at cloud scale: eliminating friction and error from your deliveries and outputs. The good news is there are architectures, tools, and frameworks you can easily leverage to make adopting this approach easier.

    Evolve to integration and build a virtuous cycle

    Ultimately your DevOps and InfraOps approaches should embody your governance needs via architecture and process. As time goes on, however, both your IT footprint and your business environment will shift. Build your tools, telemetry, and governance to anticipate and adapt to change and build a virtuous cycle between development needs and IT Operations tools and governance.

    The xOps spectrum

    This is an image of the xOps spectrum. The three main parts are: Code Acceleration (left), Governance(middle), and Infrastructure Acceleration (right)

    xOps categories

    There is no definitive list of x's in the xOps spectrum. Different organizations and teams will divide and define these in different ways. In many cases, the definitions and domains of various xOps will overlap.

    Some of the commonly adopted and defined xOps models are listed here.

    Shift left? Shift right?

    Cutting through the jargon

    • Shifting left is about focusing on the code and development aspects of a delivery cycle.
    • Shifting right is about remembering that infrastructure and tools still do matter.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Shifting left or right isn't an either/or choice. They're more like opposite sides of the same coin. Like the different xOps approaches, usually more than one shift approach will apply to your IT Operations.

    IT Operations in the left-right spectrum

    Shifting from executing and deploying to defining the guardrails and standards

    This is an image of the left-right spectrum for your XOps position

    Take a middle-out approach

    InfraOps and DevOps aren't enemies; they're opposite sides of the same coin.

    • InfraOps is about the automation and standardization of execution. It's an essential element in any fully automated CI/CD pipeline.
    • Like DevOps, InfraOps is built on similar values (the pillars of DevOps).
    • It builds on the principle of Lean to focus on removing friction, or turn-and-type activities, from the pipeline/process.
    • In InfraOps, one of the key methods for removing friction is through automation of the interstitia between different phases of a DevOps or CI/CD cycle.

    Optimize the Ops in DevOps

    Focus on eliminating friction

    This is an image of an approach to optimizing the ops in DevOps.

    With the shift from execution to governing and validating, the role of deployment falls downstream of IT Operations.

    IT Operations needs to move to a mindset that focuses on creating the guardrails, enforced standards, and compliance rules that need to be used downstream, then apply those standards using automation and tooling to remove friction and error from the interstitia (the white spaces between chevrons) of the various phases.

    InfraOps tools

    Four quadrants in the shape of a human head, in the boxes are the following: Hyperconverged Infrastructure; Composable Infrastructure; Infrastructure as code and; Automation and Orchestration

    Info-Tech Insight

    Your tools can be broken into two categories:

    • Infrastructure Architecture
      • HCI vs. CI
    • Automation Tooling
      • IaC and A&O

    Keep in mind that while your infrastructure architecture is usually an either/or choice, your automation approach should use any and all tooling that helps.

    Infrastructure approach

    • Hyperconverged

    • Composable

    Hyperconverged Infrastructure (HCI)

    Hyperconvergence is the next phase of convergence, virtualizing servers, networks, and storage on a single server/storage appliance. Capacity scales as more appliances are added to a cluster or stack.
    The disruptive departure:

    • Even though servers, networks, and storage were each on their own convergence paths, the three remained separate management domains (or silos). Even single-SKU converged infrastructures like VCE Vblocks are still composed of distinct server, network, and storage devices.
    • In hyperconvergence, the silos collapse into single-software managed devices. This has been disruptive for both the vendors of technology solutions (especially storage) and for infrastructure management.
    • Large storage array vendors are challenged by hyperconvergence alternatives. IT departments need to adapt IT skills and roles away from individual management silos and to more holistic service management.

    A comparison between converged and hyperconverged systems.

    Info-Tech Insight

    HCI follows convergence trends of the past ten years but is also a departure from how IT infrastructure has traditionally been provisioned and managed.

    HCI is at the same time a logical progression of infrastructure convergence and a disruptive departure.

    Hyperconverged (HCI) – SWOT

    HCI can be the foundation block for a fully software defined data center, a prerequisite for private cloud.

    Strengths

    • Potentially lower TCO through further infrastructure consolidation, reducing CapEx and OpEx expenditures through facilities optimization and cost consolidation.
    • Operations in particular can be streamlined, since storage, network connections, and processors/memory are all managed as abstractions via a single control pane.
    • HCI comes with built-in automation and analytics that lead to quicker issue resolution.

    Opportunities

    • Increased business agility by paving the way for a fully software defined infrastructure stack and cloud automation.
    • Shift IT human assets from hardware asset maintainers and controllers to service delivery managers.
    • Better able to compete with external IT service alternatives.
    • Move toward a hybrid cloud service offering where the service catalog contains both internal and external offerings.

    Key attributes of a cloud are automation, resource elasticity, and self-service. This kind of agility is impossible if physical infrastructure needs intervention.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Virtualization alone does not a private cloud make, but complete stack virtualization (software defined) running on a hands-off preconfigured HCI appliance (or group of appliances) provides a solid foundation for building cloud services.

    Hyperconverged (HCI) – SWOT

    Silo-busting and private cloud sound great, but are your people and processes able to manage the change?

    Weaknesses

    • HCI typically scales out linearly (CPU & storage). This does not suit traditional scale-up applications such as high-performance databases and large-capacity data warehouses.
    • Infrastructure stacks are perceived as more flexible for variable growth across segments. For example, if storage is growing but processing is not, storage can scale separately from processing.

    Threats

    • HCI will be disruptive to roles within IT. Internal pushback is a real threat if necessary changes in skills and roles are not addressed.
    • HCI is not a simple component replacement but an adoption of a different kind of infrastructure. Different places in the lifecycles for each of storage, network, and processing devices could make HCI a solution where there is no immediate problem.

    In traditional infrastructure, performance and capacity are managed as distinct though complementary jobs. An all-in-one approach may not work.

    Composable Infrastructure (CI)

    • Composable infrastructure in many ways represents the opposite of an HCI approach. Its focus is on further disaggregating resources and components used to build systems.
      • Unlike traditional cloud virtual systems, composable infrastructure provides virtual bare metal resources, allowing tightly coupled resources like CPU, RAM, and GPU – or any device/card/module – to be released back and forth into the resource pool as required by a given workload.
      • This is enabled by the use of high-speed, low-latency PCI Express (PCI-e) and Compute Express Link (CXL) fabrics that allow these resources to be decoupled.
      • It also supports the ability to present other fabric types critical for building out enterprise systems (e.g. Ethernet, InfiniBand).
    • Accordingly, CI systems are also based on next-generation network architecture that supports moving critical functions to the network layer, which enables more efficient use of the application-layer resources.

    Composable Infrastructure (CI)

    • CI may also leverage network-resident data/infrastructure processing units (DPUs/IPUs), which offload many network, security, and storage functions.
      • As new devices and functions become available, they can be added into the catalog of resources/functions available in a CI pool.

    Use Case Example: Composable AI flow

    Data Ingestion > Data Cleaning/Tagging > Training > Conclusion

    • At each phase of the process, resources, including specialized hardware like memory and GPU cores, can be dynamically allocated and reallocated to the workload on demand

    Composable Infrastructure (CI)

    Use cases and considerations

    Where it's useful

    • Enable even more efficient allocation/utilization of resources for workloads.
    • Very large memory or shared memory requirements can benefit greatly.
    • Decouple purchasing decisions for underlying resources.
    • Leverage the fabric to make it easier to incrementally upgrade underlying resources as required.
    • Build "the Impossible Server."

    Considerations

    • Requires significant footprint/scale to justify in many cases
    • Not necessarily good value for environments that aren't very volatile and heterogeneous in terms of deployment requirements
    • May not be best value for environments where resource-stranding is not a significant issue

    Info-Tech Insight

    Many organizations using a traditional approach report resource stranding as having an impact of 20% or more on efficiency. When focusing specifically on the stranding of memory in workloads, the number can often approach 40%.

    The CI ecosystem

    This is an image of the CI ecosystem.

    • The CI ecosystem has many players, large and small!
    • Note that the CI ecosystem is dependent on a large ecosystem of underlying enablers and component builders to support the required technologies.

    Understanding the differences

    This image shows the similarities and differences between traditional, cloud, hyperconverged, and composable.

    Automation approach

    • Infrastructure as Code
    • Automation & Orchestration
    • Metaorchestration

    Infrastructure as Code (IaC)

    Infrastructure as code (IaC) is the process of managing and provisioning computer data centers through machine-readable definition files rather than physical hardware configuration or interactive configuration tools.

    Before IaC, IT personnel would have to manually change configurations to manage their infrastructure. Maybe they would use throwaway scripts to automate some tasks, but that was the extent of it.

    With IaC, your infrastructure's configuration takes the form of a code file, making it easy to edit, copy, and distribute.

    Info-Tech Insight
    IaC is a critical tool in enabling key benefits!

    • Reduced costs
    • Increased scalability, flexibility, and speed
    • Better consistency and version control
    • Reduced deployment errors

    Infrastructure as Code (IaC)

    1. IaC uses a high-level descriptive coding language to automate the provisioning of IT infrastructure. This eliminates the need to manually provision and manage servers, OS, database connections, storage, and other elements every time we want to develop, test, or deploy an application.
    2. IaC allows us to define the computer systems on which code needs to run. Most commonly, we use a framework like Chef, Ansible, Puppet, etc., to define their infrastructure. These automation and orchestration tools focus on the provisioning and configuring of base compute infrastructure.
    3. IaC is also an essential DevOps practice. It enables teams to rapidly create and version infrastructure in the same way they version source code and to track these versions so as to avoid inconsistency among IT environments that can lead to serious issues during deployment.
    • Idempotence is a principle of IaC. This means a deployment command always sets the target environment into the same configuration, regardless of the environment's starting state.
      • Idempotency is achieved by either automatically configuring an existing target or discarding the existing target and recreating a fresh environment.

    Automation/Orchestration

    Orchestration describes the automated arrangement, coordination, and management of complex computer systems, middleware, and services.

    This usage of orchestration is often discussed in the context of service-oriented architecture, virtualization, provisioning, converged infrastructure, and dynamic data center topics. Orchestration in this sense is about aligning the business request with the applications, data, and infrastructure.

    It defines the policies and service levels through automated workflows,
    provisioning, and change management. This creates an application-aligned infrastructure that can be scaled up or down based on the needs of each application.

    As the requirement for more resources or a new application is triggered, automated tools now can perform tasks that previously could only be done by multiple administrators operating on their individual pieces of the physical stack.

    Orchestration also provides centralized management of the resource pool, including billing, metering, and chargeback for consumption. For example, orchestration reduces the time and effort for deploying multiple instances of a single application.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Automation and orchestration tools can be key components of an effective governance toolkit too! Remember to understand what data can be pulled from your various tools and leveraged for other purposes such as cost management and portfolio roadmapping.

    Automation/Orchestration

    There are a wide variety of orchestration and automation tools and technologies.

    Configuration Management

    Configuration Management

    The logos for companies which fall in each of the categories in the column to the left of the image.

    CI/CD
    Orchestration

    Container
    Orchestration

    Cloud-Specific
    Orchestration

    PaaS
    Orchestration

    Info-Tech Insight

    Automation and orchestration tools and software offerings are plentiful, and many of them have a different focus on where in the application delivery ecosystem they provide automation functionality.

    Often there are different tools for different deployment and service models as well as for different functional phases for each service model.

    Automation/Orchestration

    Every tool focuses on different aspects or functions of the deployment of resources and applications.

    • Resources
      • Compute
      • Storage
      • Network
    • Extended Services
      • Platforms
      • Infrastructure Services
      • Web Services
    • Application Assets
      • Images
      • Templates
      • Containers
      • Code

    Info-Tech Insight

    Let the large ecosystem of tools be your ally. Leverage the right tools where needed and then address the complexity of tools using a master orchestration scheme.

    Metaorchestration

    A Flow chart for the approach to metaorchestration.

    Additionally, most tools do not cover all aspects required for most automation implementations, especially in hybrid cloud scenarios.

    As such, often multiple tools must be deployed, which can lead to fragmentation and loss of unified controls.

    Many enterprises address this fragmentation using a cloud management platform approach.

    One method of achieving this is to establish a higher layer of orchestration – an "orchestrator of orchestrators," or metaorchestration.

    In complex scenarios, this can be a challenge that requires customization and development.

    InfraOps tools ecosystem

    Toolkit Pros Cons Tips
    HCI Easy scale out Shift in skills required Good for enabling automation and hybridization with current-gen public cloud services
    CI Maximal workload resource efficiency Investment in new fabrics and technologies Useful for very dynamic or highly scalable workloads like AI
    IaC Error reduction and standardization Managing drift in standards and requirements Leverage a standards and exception process to keep track of drift
    A&O Key enabler of DevOps automation within phases Usually requires multiple toolsets/frameworks Use the right tools and stitch together at the metaorchestration layer
    Metaorchestration Reduces the complexity of a diverse A&O and IaC toolkit Requires understanding of the entire ecosystems of tools used Key layer of visibility and control for governance

    Build a virtuous cycle

    Remember, the goal is to increase speed AND reliability. That's why we focus on removing friction from our delivery pipelines.

    • The first step is to identify the points of friction in your cycle and understand the intensity and frequency of these friction points.
    • Depending on your delivery and project management methodology, you'll have a different posture of the different tools that make sense for your pipeline.
    • For example, if you are focused on delivering raw resources for sysadmins and/or you're in a Waterfall methodology where the friction points are large but infrequent, hyperconverged is likely to delivery good value, whereas tools like IaC and orchestration may not be as necessary.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Remember that, especially in modern and rapid methodologies, your IT footprint can drift unexpectedly. This means you need a real feedback mechanism on where the friction moves to next.

    This is particularly important in more Agile methodologies.

    Activity: Map your IT operations delivery

    Identify your high-friction interstitial points

    • Using the table below, or a table modified to your delivery phases, map out the activities and tasks that are not standardized and automated.
    • For the incoming and outgoing sections, think about what resources and activities need to be (or could be) created, destroyed, or repurposed to efficiently manage each cycle and the spaces between cycles.
    Plan Code Test Deploy Monitor
    Incoming Friction
    In-Cycle Friction
    Outgoing Friction

    Info-Tech Insight

    Map your ops groups to the delivery cycles in your pipeline. How many delivery cycles do you have or need?

    Good InfraOps is a reflection of governance policies, expressed by standards in architecture and automation.

    Related Info-Tech Research

    Evaluate Hyperconverged Infrastructure for Your Infrastructure Roadmap

    • This Info-Tech note covers evaluation of HCI platforms.

    Design Your Cloud Operations

    • This Info-Tech blueprint covers organization of operations teams for various deployment and Agile modes.

    Bibliography

    Banks, Ethan, host. "Choosing Your Next Infrastructure." Datanauts, episode 094, Packet Pushers, 26 July 2017. Podcast.
    "Composable Infrastructure Solutions." Hewlett Packard Canada, n.d. Web.
    "Composable Infrastructure Technology." Liqid Inc., n.d. Web.
    "DataOps architecture design." Azure Architecture Center, Microsoft Learn, n.d. Web.
    Tan, Pei Send. "Differences: DevOps, ITOps, MLOps, DataOps, ModelOps, AIOps, SecOps, DevSecOps." Medium, 5 July 2021. Web.

    Stabilize Infrastructure & Operations During Work-From-Anywhere

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}309|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: After each Info-Tech experience, we ask our members to quantify the real-time savings, monetary impact, and project improvements our research helped them achieve.
    • member rating average days saved: Read what our members are saying
    • Parent Category Name: Strategy and Organizational Design
    • Parent Category Link: /strategy-and-organizational-design

    Work-from-anywhere isn’t going anywhere. IT Infrastructure & Operations needs to:

    • Rebuild trust in the stability of IT infrastructure and operations.
    • Identify gaps created from the COVID-19 rush to remote work.
    • Identify how IT can better support remote workers.

    IT went through an initial crunch to enable remote work. It’s time to be proactive and learn from our mistakes.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • The nature of work has fundamentally changed. IT departments must ensure service continuity, not for how the company worked in 2019, but how the company is working now and will be working tomorrow.
    • Revisit the basics. Don’t focus on becoming an innovator until you have improved network access, app access, file access, and collaboration tools.
    • Aim for near-term innovation. Once you’re a trusted operator, become a business partner by directly empowering end users at home and in the office.

    Impact and Result

    Build a work-from-anywhere strategy that resonates with the business.

    • Strengthen the foundations of collaboration tools, app access, file access, network access, and endpoint standards.
    • Explore opportunities to strengthen IT operations.
    • Proactively help the business through employee experience monitoring and facilities optimization.

    Stabilize Infrastructure & Operations During Work-From-Anywhere Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should build a strategy for improving how well IT infrastructure and operations support work-from-anywhere, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Stabilize IT infrastructure

    Ensure your fundamentals are solid.

    2. Update IT operations

    Revisit your practices to ensure you can effectively operate in work-from-anywhere.

    3. Optimize IT infrastructure & operations

    Offer additional value to the business by proactively addressing these items.

    • Roadmap Tool

    Infographic

    Workshop: Stabilize Infrastructure & Operations During Work-From-Anywhere

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Stabilize IT Infrastructure

    The Purpose

    Strengthen the foundations of IT infrastructure.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Improved end-user experience

    Stabilized environment

    Activities

    1.1 Review work-from-anywhere framework and identify capability gaps.

    1.2 Review diagnostic results to identify satisfaction gaps.

    1.3 Record improvement opportunities for foundational capabilities: collaboration, network, file access, app access.

    1.4 Identify deliverables and opportunities to provide value for each.

    Outputs

    Projects and initiatives to stabilize IT infrastructure

    Deliverables and opportunities to provide value for foundational capabilities

    2 Update IT Operations and Optimize

    The Purpose

    Update IT operational practices to support work-from-anywhere more effectively.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Improved IT operations

    Activities

    2.1 Identify IT infrastructure and operational capability gaps.

    2.2 Record improvement opportunities for DRP & BCP.

    2.3 Record improvement opportunities for endpoint and systems management practices.

    2.4 Record improvement opportunities for IT operational practices.

    2.5 Explore office space optimization and employee experience monitoring.

    Outputs

    Projects and initiatives to update IT operations to better support work-from-anywhere

    Longer-term strategic initiatives

    Deliverables and opportunities to provide value for each capability

    Explore the Secrets of IBM Software Contracts to Optimize Spend and Reduce Compliance Risk

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}141|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Licensing
    • Parent Category Link: /licensing
    • IBM customers want to make effective use of their paid-up licenses to avoid overspending and stay compliant with agreements.
    • Each IBM software product is subject to different rules.
    • Clients control and have responsibility for aligning usage and payments. Over time, the usage of the software may be out of sync with what the client has paid for, resulting in either overspending or violation of the licensing agreement.
    • IBM audits software usage in order to generate revenue from non-compliant customers.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • You have a lot of work to do if you haven’t been paying attention to your IBM software.
    • Focus on needs first. Conduct and document a thorough requirements assessment. Well-documented needs will be your core asset in negotiation.
    • Know what’s in IBM’s terms and conditions. Failure to understand these can lead to major penalties after an audit.
    • Review your agreements and entitlements quarterly. IBM may have changed the rules, and you have almost certainly changed your usage.

    Impact and Result

    • Establish clear licensing requirements.
    • Maintain an effective process for managing your IBM license usage and compliance.
    • Identify any cost-reduction opportunities.
    • Prepare for penalty-free IBM audits.

    Explore the Secrets of IBM Software Contracts to Optimize Spend and Reduce Compliance Risk Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read this Executive Brief to understand why you need to invest effort in managing usage and licensing of your IBM software.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Review terms and conditions for your IT contract

    Use Info-Tech’s licensing best practices to avoid the common mistakes of overspending on IBM licensing or failing an IBM audit.

    • IBM Passport Advantage Software RFQ Template
    • IBM 3-Year Bundled Price Analysis Tool
    [infographic]

    Design a VIP Experience for Your Service Desk

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}480|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Service Desk
    • Parent Category Link: /service-desk
    • VIPs and executives expect to get immediate service for every IT issue, no matter how minor, and the service desk is constantly in reactive mode trying to quickly resolve these issues.
    • VIPs don’t understand or have input into service desk processes, procedures, and SLAs, especially when it comes to prioritization of their issues over other tickets.
    • The C-suite calls the CIO directly with every issue they have, tying them up and forcing them to redirect resources with little notice.
    • VIP tickets sit in the queue too long without a response or resolution, and VIPs are dissatisfied with the service they receive.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Service desk and IT leaders are unclear on VIPs' service delivery expectations or the best support model to meet their needs while continuing to meet SLAs for the rest of the organization.
    • Deploying resources to service VIPs ahead of other users or more critical problems can result in inappropriate prioritization of issues and poor service delivery to the rest of the organization.
    • The reality for most organizations is that VIPs need special treatment; but providing VIP service shouldn’t come at the expense of good service delivery for the rest of the organization.

    Impact and Result

    • Stop being reactive to VIP requests and start planning for them so you can formally define the service and set expectations.
    • Talk to all relevant stakeholders to clarify their expectations before choosing a VIP service delivery model. Once you have designed your model, define and document the VIP service processes and procedures and communicate them to your stakeholders so everyone is clear on what is in and out of scope.
    • Once you’ve launched the service, track and report on key service desk metrics associated with VIP requests so you can properly allocate resources, budget accurately, evaluate the effectiveness of the service and demonstrate it to executives.

    Design a VIP Experience for Your Service Desk Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Design a VIP Experience for Your Service Desk Storyboard – A guide to defining your VIP service desk support model

    Follow the seven steps outlined in this blueprint to design a VIP support model that best suits your organization, then communicate and evaluate the service to ensure it delivers results.

    • Design a VIP Experience for Your Service Desk Storyboard

    2. Service Desk VIP Procedures Template – A customizable template to document your service desk procedures for handling VIP tickets.

    This template is designed to assist with documenting your service desk procedures for handling VIP or executive tickets. It can be adapted and customized to reflect your specific support model and procedures.

    • Service Desk VIP Procedures Template

    3. VIP Support Process Workflow Example – A Visio template to document your process for resolving VIP tickets.

    This Visio template provides an example of a VIP support process, with every step involved in resolving or fulfilling VIP service desk tickets. Use this as an example to follow and a template to document your own process.

    • VIP Support Process Workflow Example

    4. VIP Support Service Communication Template – A customizable PowerPoint template to communicate and market the service to VIP users.

    This template can be customized to use as an executive presentation to communicate and market the service to VIP users and ensure everyone is on the same page.

    • VIP Support Service Communication Template
    [infographic]

    Further reading

    Design a VIP Experience for Your Service Desk

    Keep the C-suite satisfied without sacrificing service to the rest of the organization.

    Analyst Perspective

    Stop being reactive to VIP demands and formalize their service offering.

    Natalie Sansone, PHD

    Natalie Sansone, PHD

    Research Director,
    Infrastructure & Operations
    Info-Tech Research Group

    In a perfect world, executives wouldn’t need any special treatment because the service desk could rapidly resolve every ticket, regardless of the submitter, keeping satisfaction levels high across the board.

    But we know that’s not the case for most organizations. Executives and VIPs demand higher levels of service because the reality in most companies is that their time is worth more. And any IT leader who’s had a VIP complain about their service knows that their voice also carries more weight than that of a regular dissatisfied user.

    That said, most service desks feel strapped for resources and don’t know how to improve service for VIPs without sacrificing service to the rest of the organization.

    The key is to stop being reactive to VIP demands and formalize your VIP service procedures so that you can properly set expectations for the service, monitor and measure it, and continually evaluate it to make changes if necessary.

    A VIP offering doesn’t have to mean a white glove concierge service, either – it could simply mean prioritizing VIP tickets differently. How do you decide which level of service to offer? Start by assessing your specific needs based on demand, gather requirements from relevant stakeholders, choose the right approach to fit your business needs and capabilities, clearly define and document all aspects of the service then communicate it so that everyone is on the same page as to what is in and out of scope, and continually monitor and evaluate the service to make changes and improvements as needed.

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    • VIPs and executives expect to get immediate service for every IT issue, no matter how minor, and the service desk is constantly in reactive mode trying to quickly resolve these issues.
    • VIPs don’t understand or have input into service desk processes, procedures, and SLAs, especially when it comes to prioritization of their issues over other tickets.
    • The C-suite calls the CIO directly with every issue they have, tying them up and forcing them to redirect resources with little notice.
    • VIP tickets sit in the queue too long without a response or resolution, and VIPs are dissatisfied with the service they receive.

    Common Obstacles

    • Service desk and IT leaders are unclear on the expectations that VIPs have for service delivery, or they disagree about the best support model to meet their needs while continuing to meet SLAs for the rest of the organization.
    • Service desk teams with limited resources are unsure how best to allocate those resources to handle VIP tickets in a timely manner.
    • There aren’t enough resources available at the service desk to provide the level of service that VIPs expect for their issues.
    • Deploying resources to service VIPs ahead of other users can result in inappropriate prioritization of issues and poor service delivery to the rest of the organization

    Info-Tech's Approach

    • Stop being reactive to VIP requests and start planning for them so you can formally define the service and set expectations.
    • Talk to all relevant stakeholders to clarify their expectations before choosing a VIP service delivery model.
    • Define and document the VIP service processes and procedures, including exactly what is in and out of scope.
    • Track and report on metrics associated with VIP requests so you can properly allocate resources and budget for the service.
    • Continually evaluate the service to expand, reduce, or redefine it, as necessary.

    Info-Tech Insight

    The reality for most organizations is that VIPs need special treatment. But providing VIP service shouldn’t come at the expense of good service delivery for the rest of the organization. To be successful with your approach, formalize the VIP offering to bring consistency and clear expectations for both users and the IT staff delivering the service.

    Do any of these scenarios sound familiar?

    All these familiar scenarios can occur when the service desk treats VIP issues reactively and doesn’t have a defined, documented, and agreed-upon VIP process in place.
    • A VIP calls because their personal printer isn’t working, but you also have a network issue affecting payroll being able to issue paychecks. The VIP wants their issue fixed immediately despite there being a workaround and a higher priority incident needing resources.
    • The COO calls the CIO after hours about issues they’re having with their email. The CIO immediately deploys a field tech back to the office to help the COO. Once the tech arrives, the COO says the issue could have waited until the morning.
    • The company president wants IT to spend a day at their house setting up their new personal laptop to be able to connect into the office before their vacation tomorrow. It would take away one FTE from an already understaffed service desk.
    • The CEO brings their child’s new iPhone in and asks the service desk if they have time to set it up as a favor today. The service desk manager instructs the T2 apps specialist to drop his other tickets to work on this immediately.
    • Two tickets come in at the same time – one is from an SVP who can’t log in to Teams and has an online meeting in half an hour, and the other is for a department of 10 who can’t access the network. The service desk doesn’t know who to help first.

    Different organizations can take very different approaches to VIP requests

    CASE STUDIES

    Providing VIP support helped this company grow

    Allocating a dedicated VIP technician slowed down service delivery for this company

    Situation

    A SaaS company looking to build and scale its services and customers decided to set up a VIP support program, which involved giving their most valuable customers white glove treatment to ensure they had a great experience, became long-term customers, and thus had a positive influence on others to build up the company’s customer base. VIPs were receiving executive-level support with a dedicated person for VIP tickets. The VIPs were happy with the service, but the VIP technician’s regular work was frequently impeded by having to spend most of her time doing white glove activities. The service desk found that in some cases, more critical work was slipping as a result of prioritizing all executive tickets.

    Resolution

    First, they defined who would receive VIP support, then they clearly defined the service, including what VIP support includes, who gets the service, and what their SLAs for service are. They found that the program was an effective way to focus their limited resources on the customers with the highest value potential to increase sales.
    While this model differs from an IT service desk VIP support program, the principles of dedicating resources to provide elevated support to your most important and influential customers for the benefit and growth of the company as a whole remain the same.
    The service desk decided to remove the VIP function. They demonstrated that the cost per contact was too high for dedicated executive support, and reallocating that dedicated technician to the service desk would improve the resolution time of all business incidents and requests. VIPs could still receive prioritized support through the escalation process, but they would contact the regular service desk with their issues. VIPs approved the change, and as a result of removing the dedicated support function, the service desk reduced average incident resolution times by 28% and request fulfillment times by 33%.

    A well-designed and communicated VIP support service can deliver many benefits

    The key to deciding whether a VIP service is right for your organization is to first analyze your needs, match them against your resources, then clearly define and document exactly what is in scope for the service.

    A successfully designed VIP service will lead to:

    • Executives and VIPs can easily contact the service desk and receive exceptional support and customer service from a knowledgeable technician, increasing their trust in the service desk.
    • All service desk tickets are prioritized appropriately and effectively in order to maximize overall ticket resolution and fulfillment times.
    • All users have a clear understanding of how to get in touch with the service desk and expected SLAs for specific ticket types.
    • Critical, business-impacting issues still receive priority service ahead of minor tickets submitted by a VIP.
    • All service desk technicians are clear on processes and procedures for prioritizing and handling VIP tickets.
    • Executives are satisfied with the service they receive and the value that IT provides
    • Reduced VIP downtime, contributing to overall organization productivity and growth.

    A poorly designed or reactive VIP service will lead to:

    • VIPs expect immediate service for non-critical issues, including after-hours.
    • VIPs circumvent the correct process and contact the CIO or service desk manager directly for all their issues.
    • Service desk resources stretched thin, or poor allocation of resources leads to degraded service for the majority of users.
    • More critical business issues are pushed back in order to fix non-critical executive issues.
    • Service desk is not clear how to prioritize tickets and always addresses VIP tickets first regardless of priority.
    • The service desk automatically acts on VIP tickets even when the VIP doesn’t require it or realize they’re getting a different level of service.
    • Non-VIP users are aware of the different service levels and try to request the same priority for their tickets. Support costs are over budget.

    Follow Info-Tech’s approach to design a successful VIP support model

    Follow the seven steps in this blueprint to design a VIP support model that works for your organization:
    1. Understand the support models available, from white glove service to the same service for everyone.
    2. Gather business requirements from all relevant stakeholders.
    3. Based on your business needs, choose the right approach.
    4. Define and document all details of the VIP service offering.
    5. Communicate and market the offering to VIPs so they’re aware of what’s in scope.
    6. Monitor volume and track metrics to evaluate what’s working.
    7. Continually improve or modify the service as needed over time.

    Blueprint deliverables

    The templates listed below are designed to assist you with various stages of this project. This storyboard will direct you when and how to complete them.

    Service Desk VIP Procedures Template

    Use this template to assist with documenting your service desk procedures for handling VIP or executive tickets.

    VIP Support Process Workflow Example

    Use this Visio template to document your process for resolving or fulfilling VIP tickets, from when the ticket is submitted to when it’s closed.

    VIP Support Service Communication Template

    Use this template to customize your executive presentation to communicate and market the service to VIP users.

    Insight Summary

    Key Insight

    The reality for most organizations is that VIPs need special treatment. But providing VIP service shouldn’t be at the expense of good service delivery for the rest of the organization. To be successful with your approach, formalize the VIP offering to bring consistency and clear expectations for both users and the IT staff delivering the service.

    Additional insights:

    Insight 1

    VIP service doesn’t have to mean concierge service. There are different levels and models of VIP support that range in cost and level of service provided. Carefully evaluate your needs and capacity to choose the approach that works best for your organization.

    Insight 2

    This service is for your most valued users, so design it right from the start to ensure their satisfaction. Involve stakeholders from the beginning, incorporate their feedback and requirements, keep them well-informed about the service, and continually collect and act on feedback to deliver the intended value.

    Insight 3

    Intentional, continual monitoring and measurement of the program must be part of your strategy. If your metrics or feedback show that something isn’t working, fix it. If you find that the perceived value isn’t worth the high cost of the program, make changes. Even if everything seems to be working fine, identify ways to improve it or make it more efficient.

    Step 1: Understand the different support models

    Step overview:

    • Understand the support models available, from white glove service to the same service for everyone

    First, define what “VIP support” means in your organization

    VIP support from the service desk usually refers to an elevated level of service (i.e. faster, after-hours, off-site, and/or with more experienced resources) that is provided to those at the executive level of the organization.

    A VIP typically includes executives across the business (e.g. CIO, CEO, CxO, VPs) and sometimes the executive assistants who work directly with them. However, it can also include non-executive-level but critical business roles in some organizations.

    The level of VIP service provided can differ from receiving prioritization in the queue to having a dedicated, full-time technician providing “white glove” service.

    Info-Tech Insight

    You don’t have to use the term “VIP”, as long as you clearly define the terms you are using. Some organizations use the term “VIR” to refer to very important roles rather than people, and some define “critical users” to reflect who should receive prioritized service, for example.

    There are essentially two options for VIP support, but multiple determining factors

    While the details are more specific, your options for VIP support really come down to two: they either receive some kind of enhanced service (either from a dedicated support team or through prioritization from the regular support team) or they don’t. Which option you choose will depend on a wide range of factors, some of which are represented in the diagram below. Factors such as IT budget, size of organization help determine which VIP support model you choose: Enhanced, or the same as everyone else. With enhanced service, you can opt to a dedicated support team or same support team but with prioritized service.

    Option 1: Same service for everyone

    What does it look like?

    VIP tickets are prioritized in the same way as every other ticket – with an assessment by impact and urgency. This allows every ticket to be prioritized appropriately according to how big the impact of the issue is and how quickly it needs to be resolved – regardless of who the submitter is. This means that VIPs with very urgent issues will still receive immediate support, as would a non-VIP user with a critical issue.

    Who is it best suited for?

    • Small organizations and IT teams.
    • Executives don’t want special treatment.
    • Not enough service desk resources or budget to provide prioritized or dedicated VIP service.
    • Service desk is already efficient and meeting SLAs for all requests and incidents.

    Pros

    • Highest level of consistency in service because the same process is followed for all user groups.
    • Ensures that service doesn’t suffer for non-VIP users for teams with a limited number of service desk staff.
    • No additional cost.
    • Potential to argue for more resources if executive service expectations aren’t met.

    Cons

    • Does not work if executives expect or require elevated service regardless of issue type.
    • Potential for increase in management escalations or complaints from dissatisfied executives. Some may end up jumping the queue as a result, which results in unstandardized VIP treatment only for some users.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Don’t design a VIP service solely out of fear that VIPs will be unhappy with the standard level of support the service desk provides. In some cases, it is better to focus your efforts on improving your standard support for everyone rather than only for a small percentage of users, especially if providing that elevated VIP support would further deteriorate service levels for the rest of the organization.

    Option 2: Prioritized service for VIPs

    What does it look like?

    • VIPs still go through the service desk but receive higher priority than non-VIP tickets.
    • Requests from VIP submitters are still evaluated using the standard prioritization matrix but are bumped up in urgency or priority. More critical issues can still take precedence.
    • Existing service desk resources are still used to resolve the request, but requests are just placed closer to the “front of the line.”
    • VIP users are identified in the ticketing system and may have a separate number to call or are routed differently/skip the queue within the ACD/IVR.

    Who is it best suited for?

    • Organizations that want or need to give VIPs expedited or enhanced service, but that don’t have the resources to dedicate to a completely separate VIP service desk team.

    Pros

    • Meets the need of executives for faster service.
    • Balances the need for prioritized service to VIPs while not sacrificing resources to handle most user requests.
    • All tickets still go through a single point of contact to be triaged and monitored by the service desk.
    • Easy to measure and compare performance of VIP service vs. standard service because processes are the same.

    Cons

    • Slight cost associated with implementing changes to phone system if necessary.
    • Makes other users aware that VIPs receive “special treatment” – some may try to jump the queue themselves.
    • May not meet the expectations of some executives who prefer dedicated, face-to-face resources to resolve their issues.

    Info-Tech Insight

    If you’re already informally bumping VIP tickets up the queue, this may be the most appropriate model for you. Bring formalization to your process by clearly defining exactly where VIP tickets fit in your prioritization matrix to ensure they are handled consistently and that VIPs are aware of the process.

    Option 3: Dedicated VIP service

    What does it look like?

    • VIPs contact a dedicated service desk and receive immediate/expedited support, often face to face.
    • Often a separate phone number or point of contact.
    • Similar to concierge service or “white glove” service models.
    • At least one dedicated FTE with good customer service skills and technical knowledge who builds trust with executives.

    Who is it best suited for?

    • Larger enterprises with many VIP users to support, but where VIPs are geographically clustered (as geography sprawls, the cost of the service will spiral).
    • IT organizations with enough resources on the service desk to support a dedicated VIP function.
    • Organizations where executives require immediate, in-person support.

    Pros

    • Most of the time, this model results in the fastest service delivery to executives.
    • Most personal method of delivering support with help often provided in person and from familiar, trusted technicians.
    • Usually leads to the highest level of satisfaction with the service desk from executives.

    Cons

    • Most expensive model; usually requires at least one dedicated, experienced FTE to support and sometimes after-hours support.
    • Essentially two separate service desks; can result in a disconnect between staff.
    • Career path and cross-training opportunities for the dedicated staff may be limited; role can be exhausting.
    • Reporting on the service can be more complicated and tickets are often logged after the fact.
    • If not done well, quality of service can suffer for the rest of the organization.

    Info-Tech Insight

    This type of model is essential in many large enterprises where the success of the company can depend on VIPs having access to dedicated support to minimize downtime as much as possible. However, it also requires the highest level of planning and dedication to get right. Without carefully documented processes and procedures and highly trained staff to support the model, it will fail to deliver the expected benefits.

    Step 2: Capture business needs

    Step overview:

    • Analyze your data and gather requirements to determine whether there is a need for a VIP service.

    Assess current state and metrics

    You can’t define your target state without a clear understanding of your current state. Analyze your ticket data and reports to identify the type and volume of VIP requests the service desk receives and how well you’re able to meet these requests with your current resources and structure.

    Analyze ticket data

    • What volume of tickets are you supporting? How many of those tickets come from VIP users?
    • What is your current resolution time for incidents and requests? How well are you currently meeting SLAs?
    • How quickly are executive/VIP tickets being resolved? How long do they have to wait for a response?
    • How many after-hours requests do you receive?

    Assess resourcing

    • How many users do you support; what percentage of them would be identified as VIP users?
    • How many service desk technicians do you have at each tier?
    • How well are you currently meeting demand? Would you be able to meet demand if you dedicated one or more Tier 2 technicians to VIP support?
    • If you would need to hire additional resources, is there budget to do so?

    Use the data to inform your assessment

    • Do you have a current problem with service delivery to VIPs and/or all users that needs to be addressed by changing the VIP support model?
    • Do you have the demand to support the need for a VIP service?
    • Do you have the resources to support providing VIP service?

    Leverage Info-Tech’s tools to inform your assessment

    Analyze your ticket data and reports to understand how well you’re currently meeting SLAs, your average response and resolution times, and the volume and type of requests you get from VIPs in order to understand the need for changing your current model. If you don’t have the ticket data to inform your assessment, leverage Info-Tech’s Service Desk Ticket Analysis Tool.

    Service Desk Ticket Analysis Tool

    Use this tool to identify trends and patterns in your ticket data. The ticket summary dashboard contains multiple reports analyzing how tickets come in, who requests them, who resolves them, and how long it takes to resolve them.

    If you need help understanding how well your current staff is able to handle your current ticket volume, leverage Info-Tech’s Service Desk Staffing Calculator to analyze demand and ticket volume trends. While not specifically designed to analyze VIP tickets, you could run the assessment separately for VIP volume if you have that data available.

    Service Desk Staffing Calculator

    Use this tool to help you estimate the optimal resource allocation to support your demand over time.

    Engage stakeholders to understand their requirements

    Follow your organization’s requirements gathering process to identify and prioritize stakeholders, conduct stakeholder interviews, and identify, track, and prioritize their requirements and expectations for service delivery.

    Gather requirements from VIP stakeholders

    1. Identify which stakeholders need to be consulted.
    2. Prioritize stakeholders in terms of influence and interest in order to identify who to engage in the requirements gathering process.
    3. Build a plan for gathering the requirements of key stakeholders in terms of VIP service delivery.
    4. Conduct requirements gathering and record the results of each stakeholder interaction.
    5. Analyze and summarize the results to determine the top expectations and requirements for VIP service desk support.

    If your organization does not have a defined requirements gathering process or template, leverage Info-Tech tools and templates:

    The Improve Requirements Gathering blueprint can be adapted from software requirements gathering to service desk.

    The PMO Requirements Gathering Tool can be adapted from interviewing stakeholders on their PMO requirements to service desk requirements.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Don’t guess at what your VIPs need or want – ask them and involve them in the service design. Many IT leaders sacrifice overall service quality to prioritize VIPs, thinking they expect immediate service. However, they later find out that the VIPs just assumed the service they were receiving was the standard service and many of their issues can wait.

    Identify additional challenges and opportunities by collecting perceptions of business users and stakeholders

    Formally measuring perceptions from your end users and key business stakeholders will help to inform your needs and determine how well the service desk is currently meeting demands from both VIP users and the entire user base.

    CIO Business Vision

    Info-Tech's CIO Business Vision program is a low-effort, high-impact program that will give you detailed report cards on the organization’s satisfaction with IT’s core services. Use these insights to understand your key business stakeholders, find out what is important to them, and improve your interactions.

    End User Satisfaction

    Info-Tech’s End User Satisfaction Program helps you measure end-user satisfaction and importance ratings of core IT services, IT communications, and business enablement to help you decide which IT service capabilities need to be addressed to meet the demands of the business.

    Learn more about Info-Tech’s CIO Business Vision or End User Satisfaction Program .

    Step 3: Choose the right approach

    Step overview:

    • Based on your assessment from Step 2, decide on the best way to move forward with your VIP service model.

    Use your assessment results to choose the most appropriate support model

    The table below is a rough guide for how the results of your assessments may line up to the most appropriate model for your organization:

    Example assessment results for: Dedicated service, prioritized service, and same servce based off of the assessment source: Ticket analysis, staffing analysis, or stakeholder.

    Info-Tech Insight

    If you’re in the position of deciding how to improve service to VIPs, it’s unlikely that you will end up choosing the “same service” model. If your data analysis tells you that you are currently meeting every metric target for all users, this may actually indicate that you’re overstaffed at the service desk.

    If you choose a specialized VIP support model, ensure there is a strong, defined need before moving forward

    Do not proceed if:

    • Your decision is purely reactive in response to a perceived need or challenges you’re currently experiencing
    • The demand is coming from a single dissatisfied executive without requirements from other VIPs being collected.
    • Your assessment data does not support the demand for a dedicated VIP function.
    • You don’t have the resources or support required to be successful in the approach.

    Proceed with a VIP model if:

    • You’re prepared to scale and support the model over the long term.
    • Business stakeholders have clearly expressed a need for improved VIP service.
    • Data shows that there is a high volume of urgent requests from VIPs.
    • You have the budget and resources required to support an enhanced VIP service delivery model.

    Step 4: Design the service offering

    Step overview:

    • Define and document all processes, procedures, and responsibilities relevant to the VIP support offering.

    Clearly define the service and eligible users

    Once you’ve decided on the most appropriate model, clearly describe the service and document who is eligible to receive it.

    1. Define exactly what the service is before going into the procedural details. High-level examples to start from are provided below:

    Prioritized Service Model

    When a designated VIP user contacts the service desk with a question, incident, or service request, their ticket will be prioritized over non-VIP tickets following the prioritization matrix. This process has been designed in accordance with business needs and requirements, as defined VIP users have more urgent demands on their time and the impact of downtime is greater as it has the potential to impact the business. However, all tickets, VIP tickets included, must still be prioritized by impact and urgency. Incidents that are more critical will still be resolved before VIP tickets in accordance with the prioritization process.

    Dedicated Service Model

    VIP support is a team of dedicated field technicians available to provide an elevated level of service including deskside support for executives and designated VIP users. VIP users have the ability to contact the VIP support service through a dedicated phone number and will receive expedited ticket handling and resolution by dedicated Tier 2 specialists with experience dealing with executives and their unique needs and requirements. This process has been designed in accordance with business needs and requirements.

    2 Identify VIP-eligible users

    • Define who qualifies as a VIP to receive VIP support or be eligible to contact the dedicated VIP service desk/concierge desk.
    • If other users or EAs can submit tickets on behalf of VIPs, identify those individuals as well.
    • Review the list and cut back if necessary. Less is usually more here, especially when starting out. If everyone is a VIP, then no one is truly a VIP.
    • Identify who maintains ownership over the list of eligible VIP users and how any changes to the list or requests for changes will be handled.
    • Ensure that all VIP-eligible users are clearly identified in the ITSM system.

    Map out the VIP process in a workflow

    Use a visual workflow to document the process for resolving or fulfilling VIP tickets, from when the ticket is submitted to when it gets closed.

    Your workflow should address the following:

    • How should the ticket be prioritized?
    • When are escalations necessary?
    • What happens if a user requests VIP service but is not defined as eligible?
    • Should the user verify that the issue is resolved before the ticket is closed?
    • What automatic notifications or communications need to go out and when?
    • What manual communications or notifications need to be sent out (e.g. when a ticket is escalated or reassigned)?
    VIP Support Process Example.

    Use the VIP Support Process Workflow Example as a template to map out your own process.

    Define and document all VIP processes and procedures

    Clearly describe the service and all related processes and procedures so that both the service delivery team and users are on the same page.

    Define all aspects of the service so that every VIP request will follow the same standardized process and VIPs will have clear expectations for the service they receive. This may include:

    • How VIPs should contact the service desk
    • How VIP tickets will be prioritized
    • SLAs and service expectations for VIP tickets
    • Ticket resolution or fulfillment steps and process
    • Escalation points and contacts
    • After-hours requests process

    If VIP user requests receive enhanced priority, for example, define exactly how those requests should be prioritized using your prioritization matrix. An example is found below and in the Service Desk VIP Procedures Template.

    Prioritization matrix for classification of incidents and requests.

    Use Info-Tech’s Service Desk VIP Procedures Template as a guide

    This template is designed to assist with documenting your service desk procedures for handling VIP or executive tickets. The template is not meant to cover all possible VIP support models but is an example of one support model only. It should be adapted and customized to reflect your specific support model and procedures.

    It includes the following sections:

    1. VIP support description/overview
    2. VIP support entitlement (who is eligible)
    3. Procedures
      • Ticket submission and triage
      • Ticket prioritization
      • SLAs and escalation
      • VIP ticket resolution process
      • After-hours requests
    4. Monitoring and reporting

    Download the Service Desk VIP Procedures Template

    Allocate resources or assign responsibilities specific to VIP support

    Regardless of the support model you choose, you’ll need to be clear on service desk agents’ responsibilities when dealing with VIP users.
    • Clarify the expectations of any service desk agent who will be handling VIP tickets; they should demonstrate excellent customer service skills and expertise, respect for the VIP and the sensitivity of their data, and prompt service.
    • Use a RACI chart to clarify responsibility and accountability for VIP-specific support tasks.
    • If you will be moving to a dedicated VIP support team, clearly define the responsibilities of any new roles or tasks. Sample responsibilities can be found on the right.
    • If you will be changing the role of an existing service desk agent to become focused solely on providing VIP support, clarify how the responsibilities of other service desk agents may change too, if at all.
    • Be clear on expectations of agents for after-hours support, especially if there will be a change to the current service provision.

    Sample responsibilities for a dedicated VIP support technician/specialist may include:

    • Resolve support tickets for all eligible VIP users following established processes and procedures.
    • Provide both onsite and remote support to executives.
    • Quickly and effectively diagnose and resolve technical issues with minimal disruption to the executive team.
    • Establish trust with executives/VIPs by maintaining confidentiality and privacy while providing technical support.
    • Set up, monitor, and support high-priority meetings, conferences, and events.
    • Demonstrate excellent communication and customer service skills when providing support to executives.
    • Coordinate more complex support issues with higher level support staff and track tickets through to resolution when needed.
    • Learn new technology and software ahead of implementation to train and support executive teams for use.
    • Conduct individual or group training as needed to educate on applications or how to best use technology to enhance productivity.
    • Proactively manage, maintain, update, and upgrade end-user devices as needed.

    Configure your ITSM tool to support your processes

    Configure your tool to support your processes, not the other way around.
    • Identify and configure VIP users in the system to ensure that they are easily identifiable in the system (e.g. there may be a symbol beside their name).
    • Configure automations or build ticket templates that would automatically set the urgency or priority of VIP tickets.
    • Configure any business rules or workflows that apply to the VIP support process.
    • Define any automated notifications that need to be sent when a VIP ticket is submitted, assigned, escalated, or resolved (e.g. notify service desk manager or a specific DL).
    • Define metrics and customize dashboards and reports to monitor VIP tickets and measure the success of the VIP service.
    • Configure any SLAs that apply only to VIPs to ensure displayed SLAs are accurate.

    Step 5: Launch the service

    Step overview:

    • Communicate and market the service to all relevant stakeholders so everyone is on the same page as to how it works and what’s in scope.

    Communicate the new or revised service to relevant stakeholders ahead of the launch

    If you did your due diligence, the VIP service launch won’t be a surprise to executives. However, it’s critical to

    continue the engagement and communicate the details of the service well to ensure there are no misperceptions about the

    service when it launches.

    Goals of communicating and marketing the service:

    1. Create awareness and understanding of the purpose of the VIP service and what it means for eligible users.
    2. Solidify commitment and buy-in for the service from all stakeholders.
    3. Ensure that all users know how to access the service and any changes to the way they should interact with the service desk.
    4. Set expectations for new/revised service levels.
    5. Reduce and address any concerns about the change in process.

    Info-Tech Insight

    This step isn’t only for the launch of new services. Even if you’re enhancing or right-sizing an existing VIP service, take the opportunity to market the improvements, remind users of the correct processes, and collect feedback.

    Leverage Info-Tech’s communication template to structure your presentation

    This template can be customized to use as an executive presentation to communicate and market the service to VIP users. It includes:

    • Key takeaways
    • Current-state assessment
    • Requirements gathering and feedback results
    • Objectives for the service
    • Anticipated benefits
    • Service entitlement
    • How the service works
    • Escalations and feedback contacts
    • Timeline of next steps

    Info-Tech Insight

    If you’re launching a dedicated concierge service for VIPs, highlight the exclusivity of the service in your marketing to draw users in. For example, if eligible VIPs get a separate number to call, expedited SLAs, or access to more tenured service desk experts, promote this added value of the service.

    Download the VIP Support Service Communication Template

    Step 6: Monitor and measure

    Step overview:

    • Measure and monitor the success of the program by tracking and reporting on targeted metrics.

    Evaluate and demonstrate the success of the program with key metrics

    Targeted metrics to evaluate the success of the VIP program will be critical to understanding and demonstrating whether the service is delivering the intended value. Track key metrics to:

    • Track if and how well you’re meeting your defined SLAs for VIP support.
    • Measure demand for VIP support (i.e. ticket volume and types of tickets) and evaluate against resource supply to determine whether a staffing adjustment is needed to meet demand.
    • Measure the cost of providing the VIP service in order to report back to executives.
    • Leverage real data to quantitatively demonstrate that you’re providing enhanced service to VIPs if there is an escalation or negative feedback from one individual.
    • Monitor service delivery to non-VIP users to ensure that service to the rest of the organization isn’t impacted by the VIP service
    • Evaluate the types of ticket that are submitted to the VIP service to inform training plans, self-service options, device upgrades, or alternatives to reduce future volume.

    Info-Tech Insight

    If your data definitively shows the VIP offering delivers enhanced service levels, publish these results to business leadership. A successful VIP service is a great accomplishment to market and build credibility for the service desk.

    Tie metrics to critical success factors

    Apart from your regular service desk metrics, identify the top metrics to tie to the key performance indicators of the program’s success factors.

    Sample Critical Success Factors

    • Increased executive satisfaction with the service desk
    • Improved response and resolution times to VIP tickets
    • Demand for the service is matched by supply

    Sample Metrics

    • End-user satisfaction scores on VIP tickets
    • Executive satisfaction with the service desk as measured on a broader annual survey
    • Response and resolution times for VIP tickets
    • Percentage of SLAs met for VIP tickets
    • VIP ticket volume
    • Average speed of answer for VIP calls

    Download Define Service Desk Metrics that Matter and the Service Desk Metrics Workbook for help defining CSFs, KPIs, and key metrics

    Step 7: Continually improve

    Step overview:

    • Continually evaluate the program to identify opportunities for improvement or modifications to the service support model.

    Continually evaluate the service to identify improvements

    Executives are happy, resolution times are on target – now what? Even if everything seems to be working well, never stop monitoring, measuring, and evaluating the service. Not only can metrics change, but there can also always be ways to improve service.

    • Continual improvement should be a mindset – there are always opportunities for improvement, and someone should be responsible for identifying and tracking these opportunities so that they actually get done.
    • Just as you asked for feedback and involvement from VIPs (and their assistants who may submit tickets on their behalf) in designing the service, you should continually collect that feedback and use it to inform improvements to the service.
    • End-user satisfaction surveys, especially broader, more targeted surveys, are also a great source of improvement ideas.
    • Even if end users don’t perceive any need for improvement, IT should still assess how they can make their own processes more efficient or offer alternatives to make delivery easier.

    Download Info-Tech’s Build a Continual Improvement Program blueprint to help you build a process around continual improvement, and use the Continual Improvement Register tool to help you identify and prioritize improvement initiatives.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Don’t limit your continual improvement efforts to the VIP service. Once you’ve successfully elevated the VIP service, look to how you can apply elements of that service to elevate support to the rest of the organization. For example, through providing a roaming service desk, a concierge desk, a Genius-Bar-style walk-in service, etc.

    Expand, reduce, or modify as needed

    Don’t stop with a one-time program evaluation. Continually use your metrics to evaluate whether the service offering needs to change to better suit the needs of your executives and organization. It may be fine as is, or you may find you need to do one of the following:

    Expand

    • If the service offering has been successful and/or your data shows underuse of VIP-dedicated resources, you may be able to expand the offering to identify additional roles as VIP-eligible.
    • Be cautious not to expand the service too widely; not only should it feel exclusive to VIPs, but you need to be able to support it.
    • Also consider whether elements that have been successful in the VIP program (e.g. a concierge desk, after-hours support) should be expanded to be offered to non-VIPs.

    Reduce

    • If VIPs are not using the service as much as anticipated or data shows supply outweighs demand, you may consider scaling back the service to save costs and resources.
    • However, be careful in how you approach this – it shouldn’t negatively impact service to existing users.
    • Rather, evaluate costly services like after-hours support and whether it’s necessary based on demand, adjust SLAs if needed, or reallocate service desk resources or responsibilities. For example, if demand doesn’t justify a dedicated service desk technician, either add non-VIP tasks to their responsibilities or consider moving to a prioritized model.

    Modify

    • The support model doesn’t need to be set in stone. If elements aren’t working, change them! If the entire support model isn’t working, reevaluate if it’s the best model for your organization.
    • Don’t make decisions in a vacuum, though. Just as executives were involved in decision-making at the outset, continually gather their feedback and use it to inform the service design.

    Related Info-Tech Research

    Standardize the Service Desk

    This project will help you build and improve essential service desk processes, including incident management, request fulfillment, and knowledge management to create a sustainable service desk.

    Optimize the Service Desk With a Shift-Left Strategy

    This project will help you build a strategy to shift service support left to optimize your service desk operations and increase end-user satisfaction.

    Build a Continual Improvement Plan

    This project will help you build a continual improvement plan for the service desk to review key processes and services and manage the progress of improvement initiatives.

    Deliver a Customer Service Training Program to Your IT Department

    This project will help you deliver a targeted customer service training program to your IT team to enhance their customer service skills when dealing with end users, improve overall service delivery, and increase customer satisfaction.

    Works Cited

    Munger, Nate. “Why You Should Provide VIP Customer Support.” Intercom, 13 Jan. 2016. Accessed Jan. 2023.

    Ogilvie, Ryan. “We Did Away With VIP Support and Got More Efficient.” HDI, 17 Sep. 2020. Accessed Jan. 2023.

    Build a Platform-Based Organization

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}98|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 8.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $3,420 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 2 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Innovation
    • Parent Category Link: /innovation
    • The organization is riddled with bureaucracy. Some even believe that bureaucracy is inevitable and is an outcome of a complex business operating in a complex market and regulatory environment.
    • Time to market for new products and services is excruciatingly long.
    • Digital natives like Facebook, Netflix, and Spotify do not compare well with the organization and cannot be looked to for inspiration.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Large corporations often consist of a few operating units, each with its own idiosyncracies about strategies, culture, and capabilities. These tightly integrated operating units make a company prone to bureaucracy.
    • The antidote to this bureaucracy is a platform structure: small, autonomous teams operating as startups within the organization.

    Impact and Result

    • Platforms consist of related activities and associated technologies that deliver on a specific organizational goal. A platform can therefore be run as a business or as a service. This structure of small autonomous teams that are loosely joined will make your employees directly accountable to the customers. In a way, they become entrepreneurs and do not remain just employees.

    Build a Platform-Based Organization Research & Tools

    Build a platform-based organization

    Download our guide to learn how you can get started with a platform structure.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    • Build a Platform-Based Organization Storyboard
    [infographic]

    Further reading

    Build a Platform-Based Organization

    Use a platform structure to overcome bureaucracy.

    Analyst Perspective

    Build a platform-based organization.

    Bureaucracy saps innovation out of large corporations. Some even believe that bureaucracy is inevitable and is an outcome of a complex business operating in a complex market and regulatory environment.

    So, what is the antidote to bureaucracy? Some look to startups like Uber, Airbnb, Netflix, and Spotify, but they are digital native and don’t compare well to a large monolithic corporation.

    However, all is not lost for large corporations. Inspiration can be drawn from a company in China – Haier, which is not a typical poster child of the digital age like Spotify. In fact, three decades ago, it was a state-owned company with a shoddy product quality.

    Haier uses an intriguing organization structure based on microenterprises and platforms that has proven to be an antidote to bureaucracy.

    Vivek Mehta
    Research Director, Digital & Innovation
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive Summary

    The Challenge

    Large corporations are prone to bureaucracies, which sap their organizations of creativity and make them blind to new opportunities. Though many executives express the desire to get rid of it, bureaucracy is thriving in their organizations.

    Why It Happens

    As organizations grow and become more complex over time, they yearn for efficiency and control. Some believe bureaucracy is the natural outcome of running a complex organization in a complex business and regulatory environment.

    Info-Tech’s Approach

    A new organizational form – the platform structure – is challenging the bureaucratic model. The platform structure makes employees directly accountable to customers and organizes them in an ecosystem of autonomous units.

    As a starting point, sketch out a platform structure that works for your organization. Then, establish a governance model and identify and nurture key capabilities for the platform structure.

    Info-Tech Insight

    The antidote to bureaucracy is a platform structure: small, autonomous teams operating as startups within the organization.

    Executive Brief Case Study

    Small pieces, loosely joined

    Haier

    Industry: Manufacturing
    Source: Harvard Business Review November-December 2018

    Haier, based in China, is currently the world’s largest appliance maker. Zhang Ruimin, Haier’s CEO, has built an intriguing organizing structure where every employee is directly accountable to customers – internal and/or external. A large corporation often consists of a few operating units, each with its own idiosyncrasies, which makes it slow to innovate. To avoid that, Haier has divided itself into 4,000 microenterprises (MEs), most of which have ten to 15 employees. There are three types of microenterprises in Haier:

    1. Approximately 200 “transforming” MEs: market-facing units like Zhisheng, which manufactures refrigerators, a legacy Haier product, for today’s young urbanites.
    2. Approximately 50 “incubating” MEs: entirely new businesses like Xinchu that wrap existing products into entirely new business models.
    3. Approximately 3,800 “node” MEs: units that sell component products and services such as design, manufacturing, and human resources support to Haier’s market-facing MEs.

    Each ME operates as an autonomous unit with its own targets – an organizing structure that enables innovation at Haier.

    (Harvard Business Review, 2018)

    The image is a rectangular graphic with the words Refrigeration Platform in the centre. There are six text boxes around the centre, reading (clockwise from top left): Zhisheng Young urbanites; Langdu Premium; Jinchu Mid-priced; Xinchu Internet-connected; Overseas Export markets; Leader Value-priced. There are a series of white boxes bordering the graphic, with the following labels: at top--Sales nodes; at right--Support nodes (R&D, HR, supply chain, etc.); at bottom left---Design nodes; at bottom right--Production nodes.

    Markets disproportionately reward platform structure

    Tech companies like Facebook, Netflix, and Spotify are organized around a set of modular platforms run by accountable platform teams. This modular org structure enables them to experiment, learn, and scale quickly – a key attribute of innovative organizations.

    Facebook ~2,603 million monthly active users

    India ~1,353 million population

    Netflix ~183 million monthly paid subscribers

    Spotify ~130 million premium subscribers

    Canada ~37 million population

    (“Facebook Users Worldwide 2020,” “Number of Netflix Subscribers 2019,” “Spotify Users - Subscribers in 2020,” Statista.)

    1. Sketch Out the Platform Structure

    What is a platform anyway?

    A modular component of an org structure

    Platforms consist of a logical cluster of activities and associated technology that delivers on a specific business goal and can therefore be run as a business, or ‘as a service’ … Platforms focus on business solutions to serve clients (internal or external) and to supply other platforms.” – McKinsey, 2019

    Platforms operate as independent units with their own business, technology, governance, processes, and people management. As an instance, a bank could have payments platform under a joint business and IT leadership. This payments-as-a-service platform could provide know-how, processes, and technology to the bank’s internal customers such as retail and commercial business units.

    Many leading IT organizations are set up in a platform-based structure that allows them to rapidly innovate. It’s an imperative for organizations in other industries that they must pilot and then scale with a platform play.

    What a platform-based org looks like

    It looks like a multicellular organism, where each cell is akin to a platform

    An organism consists of multiple cells of different types, sizes, and shapes. Each cell is independent in its working. Regardless of the type, a cell would have three features –the nucleus, the cell membrane, and, between the two, the cytoplasm.

    Similarly, an organization could be imagined as one consisting of several platforms of different types and sizes. Each platform must be autonomous, but they all share a few common features – have a platform leader, set up and monitor targets, and enable interoperability amongst platforms. Platforms could be of three types (McKinsey, 2019):

    1. Customer-journey platforms enable customer proposition and experience built on reusable code. They provide “journey as a service”; for example, Account Opening in a bank.
    2. Business-solution platforms are modular and run as a business or as a service. They provide “company as a service”; for example, Payments or Fraud Detection in a bank.
    3. Core IT provisioning platforms provide core IT services for the organization, for example, cloud, data, automation.

    There are two images: in the lower part of the graphic shows a multicellular organism, and has text pointing to a single cell. At the top, there is a zoomed in image of that single cell, with its component parts labelled: Cell Membrane, Nucleus, and Cytoplasm.

    Case study: Payments platform in a bank

    Payments as a service to internal business units

    The payments platform is led by an SVP – the platform leader. Business and IT teams are colocated and have joint leadership. The platform team works with a mindset of a startup, serving internal customers of the bank – retail and commercial lines of business.

    A diagram showing Advisory Council in a large grey box on the left. To the right are smaller dark blue boxes labeled 'Real-time peer-to-peer payments,' Wire transfers,' 'Batch payments,' 'Mobile wallets,' and 'International payments (VISA, WU, etc.),' and one light blue box labeled 'Payments innovation.'


    Advisory Council: An Advisory Council is responsible for strategy, business, and IT architecture and for overseeing the work within the team. The Advisory Council prioritizes the work, earmarks project budgets, sets standards such as for APIs and ISO 20022, and leads vendor evaluation.

    International payments (VISA, WU, etc.): Project execution teams are structured around payment modes. Teams collaborate with each other whenever a common functionality is to be developed, like fraud check on a payment or account posting for debits and credits.

    Payments innovation: A think tank keeping track of trends in payments and conducting proof of concepts (POCs) with prospective fintech partners and with new technologies.

    Use a capability map to sketch out a platform-based structure

    Corral your organization’s activities and associated tech into a set of 20 to 40 platforms that cover customer journeys, business capabilities, and core IT. Business and IT teams must jointly work on this activity and could use a capability map as an aid to facilitate the discussion.

    The image is an example of a capability map, shown in more detail in the following section.

    An example of sketching a platform-based org structure for an insurance provider (partial)

    Design Policy Create Policy Issue Policy Service Customers Process Claims Manage Investments
    Defining Market Research & Analysis Underwriting Criteria Selection Customer Targeting Interaction Management First Notice of Loss (FNOL) Investment Strategy
    Actuarial Analysis Product Reserving Needs Assessment & Quotes Payments Claims Investigation Portfolio Management
    Catastrophe Risk Modeling Reinsurance Strategy Contract Issuance Adjustments Claims Adjudication Deposits & Disbursements
    Product Portfolio Strategy Product Prototyping Application Management Renewals Claims Recovery (Subrogation) Cash & Liquidity Management
    Rate Making Product Testing Sales Execution Offboarding Dispute Resolution Capital Allocation
    Policy Definition Product Marketing Contract Change Management

    Customer Retention

    [Servicing a customer request is a customer-journey platform.]

    Claims Inquiry

    [Filing a claim is a customer-journey platform.]

    Credit Bureau Reporting
    Shared Customer Management

    Account Management

    [Customer and account management is a business-capability platform to enable journeys.]

    Channel Management Risk Management Regulatory & Compliance Knowledge Management
    Partner Management

    Access and Identity Management

    [Access and identity management is a core IT platform.]

    Change Management Enterprise Data Management Fraud Detection [Fraud detection is a business-capability platform to enable journeys.] Product Innovation
    Enabling Corporate Governance Strategic Planning Reporting Accounting Enterprise Architecture Human Resources
    Legal Corporate Finance IT Facilities Management

    2. Establish Governance and Nurture Key Capabilities

    Two ingredients of the platform structure

    Establish a governance

    Advisory Council (AC) operates like a conductor at an orchestra, looking across all the activities to understand and manage the individual components.

    Nurture key capabilities

    Team structure, processes and technologies must be thoughtfully orchestrated and nurtured.

    Establish strong governance

    Empowerment does not mean anarchy

    While platforms are distinct units, they must be in sync with each other, like individual musicians in an orchestra. The Advisory Council (AC) must act like a conductor of the orchestra and lead and manage across platforms in three ways.

    1. Prioritize spend and effort. The AC team makes allocation decisions and prioritizes spend and effort on those platforms that can best support organizational goals and/or are in most urgent technical need. The best AC teams have enterprise architects who can understand business and dive deep enough into IT to manage critical interdependencies.
    2. Set and enforce standards. The AC team establishes both business and technology standards for interoperability. For example, the AC team can set the platform and application interfaces standards and the industry standards like ISO 20022 for payments. The AC team can also provide guidance on common apps and tools to use, for example, a reconciliation system for payments.
    3. Facilitate cross-platform work. The AC team has a unique vantage point where it can view and manage interdependencies among programs. As these complexities emerge, the AC team can step in and facilitate the interaction among the involved platform teams. In cases when a common capability is required by multiple platforms, the AC team can facilitate the dialogue to have it built out.

    Nurture the following capabilities:

    Design thinking

    “Zero distance from the customer” is the focus of platform structure. Each platform must operate with a mindset of a startup serving internal and/or external users.

    Agile delivery model

    Platform teams iteratively develop their offerings. With guidance from Advisory Council, they can avoid bottlenecks of formal alignment and approvals.

    Enterprise architecture

    The raison d'être of enterprise architecture discipline is to enable modularity in the architecture, encourage reusability of assets, and simplify design.

    Microservices

    Microservices allow systems to grow with strong cohesion and weak coupling and enable teams to scale components independently.

    APIs

    With their ability to link systems and data, APIs play a crucial role in making IT systems more responsive and adaptable.

    Machine learning

    With the drop in its cost, predictability is becoming the new electricity for business. Platforms use machine learning capability for better predictions.

    Related Info-Tech Research

    Drive Digital Transformation With Platform Strategies
    Innovate and transform your business models with digital platforms.

    Implement Agile Practices That Work
    Guide your organization through its Agile transformation journey.

    Design a Customer-Centric Digital Operating Model
    Putting the customer at the center of digital transformation.

    Bibliography

    Bossert, Oliver, and Jürgen Laartz. “Perpetual Evolution—the Management Approach Required for Digital Transformation.” McKinsey, 5 June 2017. Accessed 21 May 2020.

    Bossert, Oliver, and Driek Desmet. “The Platform Play: How to Operate like a Tech Company.” McKinsey, 28 Feb. 2019. Accessed 21 May 2020.

    “Facebook Users Worldwide 2020.” Statista. Accessed 21 May 2020.

    Hamel, Gary, and Michele Zanini. “The End of Bureaucracy.” Harvard Business Review. Nov.-Dec. 2018. Accessed 21 May 2020.

    “Number of Netflix Subscribers 2019.” Statista. Accessed 21 May 2020.

    “Spotify Users - Subscribers in 2020.” Statista. Accessed 21 May 2020.

    Embed Privacy and Security Culture Within Your Organization

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}379|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 10.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: 10 Average Days Saved
    • member rating average days saved: After each Info-Tech experience, we ask our members to quantify the real-time savings, monetary impact, and project improvements our research helped them achieve.
    • Parent Category Name: Governance, Risk & Compliance
    • Parent Category Link: /governance-risk-compliance

    Engagement with privacy and security within organizations has not kept pace with the increasing demands from regulations. As a result, organizations often find themselves saying they support privacy and security engagement but struggling to create behavioral changes in their staff.

    However, with new privacy and security requirements proliferating globally, we can’t help but wonder how much longer we can carry on with this approach.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    To truly take hold, privacy and security engagement must be supported by senior leadership, aligned with business objectives, and embedded within each of the organization’s operating groups and teams.

    Impact and Result

    • Develop a defined structure for privacy and security in the context of your organization, your obligations, and your objectives.
    • Align your business goals and strategy with privacy and security to obtain support from your senior leadership team.
    • Identify and implement a set of metrics to monitor the success of each of the six engagement enablers amongst your team.

    Embed Privacy and Security Culture Within Your Organization Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should develop a culture of privacy and security at your organization, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Define privacy and security in the context of the organization

    Use the charter template to document the primary outcomes and objectives for the privacy and security engagement program within the organization and map the organizational structure to each of the respective roles to help develop a culture of privacy and security.

    • Privacy and Security Engagement Charter

    2. Map your privacy and security enablers

    This tool maps business objectives and key strategic goals to privacy and security objectives and attributes identified as a part of the overall engagement program. Leverage the alignment tool to ensure your organizational groups are mapped to their corresponding enablers and supporting metrics.

    • Privacy and Security Business Alignment Tool

    3. Identify and track your engagement indicators

    This document maps out the organization’s continued efforts in ensuring employees are engaged with privacy and security principles, promoting a strong culture of privacy and security. Use the playbook to document and present the organization’s custom plan for privacy and security culture.

    • Privacy and Security Engagement Playbook

    Infographic

    Workshop: Embed Privacy and Security Culture Within Your Organization

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Determine Drivers and Engagement Objectives

    The Purpose

    Understand the current privacy and security landscape in the organization.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Targeted set of drivers from both a privacy and security perspective

    Activities

    1.1 Discuss key drivers for a privacy and security engagement program.

    1.2 Identify privacy requirements and objectives.

    1.3 Identify security requirements and objectives.

    1.4 Review the business context.

    Outputs

    Understanding of the role and requirements of privacy and security in the organization

    Privacy drivers and objectives

    Security drivers and objectives

    Privacy and security engagement program objectives

    2 Align Privacy and Security With the Business

    The Purpose

    Ensure that your privacy and security engagement program is positioned to obtain the buy-in it needs through business alignment.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Direct mappings between a culture of privacy and security and the organization’s strategic and business objectives

    Activities

    2.1 Review the IT/InfoSec strategy with IT and the InfoSec team and map to business objectives.

    2.2 Review the privacy program and privacy strategic direction with the Privacy/Legal/Compliance team and map to business objectives.

    2.3 Define the four organizational groupings and map to the organization’s structure.

    Outputs

    Privacy and security objectives mapped to business strategic goals

    Mapped organizational structure to Info-Tech’s organizational groups

    Framework for privacy and security engagement program

    Initial mapping assessment within Privacy and Security Business Alignment Tool

    3 Map Privacy and Security Enablers to Organizational Groups

    The Purpose

    Make your engagement plan tactical with a set of enablers mapped to each of the organizational groups and privacy and security objectives.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Measurable indicators through the use of targeted enablers that customize the organization’s approach to privacy and security culture

    Activities

    3.1 Define the privacy enablers.

    3.2 Define the security enablers.

    3.3 Map the privacy and security enablers to organizational structure.

    3.4 Revise and complete Privacy and Security Business Alignment Tool inputs.

    Outputs

    Completed Privacy and Security Engagement Charter.

    Completed Privacy and Security Business Alignment Tool.

    4 Identify and Select KPIs and Metrics

    The Purpose

    Ensure that metrics are established to report on what the business wants to see and what security and privacy teams have planned for.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    End-to-end, comprehensive program that ensures continued employee engagement with privacy and security at all levels of the organization.

    Activities

    4.1 Segment KPIs and metrics based on categories or business, technical, and behavioral.

    4.2 Select KPIs and metrics for tracking privacy and security engagement.

    4.3 Assign ownership over KPI and metric tracking and monitoring.

    4.4 Determine reporting cadence and monitoring.

    Outputs

    KPIs and metrics identified at a business, technical, and behavioral level for employees for continued growth

    Completed Privacy and Security Engagement Playbook

    Build an IT Employee Engagement Program

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}544|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.2/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $5,734 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 8 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Engage
    • Parent Category Link: /engage
    • IT’s performance and stakeholder satisfaction with IT services hinge on IT’s ability to attract and retain top talent and to motivate teams to go above and beyond.
    • With the growing IT job market, turnover is a serious threat to IT’s ability to deliver seamless value and continuously drive innovation.
    • Engagement initiatives are often seen as being HR’s responsibility; however, IT leadership needs to take accountability for the retention and productivity of their employees in order to drive business value.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Engagement is a two-way street. Initiatives must address a known need and be actively sought by employees – not handed down from management.
    • Engagement initiatives are useless unless they target the right issues. It can be tempting to focus on the latest perks and gadgets and ignore difficult issues. Use a systematic approach to uncover and tackle the real problems.
    • It’s time for IT leadership to step up. IT leaders have a much bigger impact on IT staff engagement than HR ever can. Leverage this power to lead your team to peak performance.

    Impact and Result

    • Info-Tech engagement diagnostics and accompanying tools will help you perform a deep dive into the root causes of disengagement on your team.
    • The guidance that accompanies Info-Tech’s tools will help you avoid common engagement program pitfalls and empower IT leaders to take charge of their own team’s engagement.

    Build an IT Employee Engagement Program Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to discover why engagement is critical to IT performance, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand how our tools will help you construct an effective employee engagement program.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Measure employee engagement

    Use Info-Tech's Pulse or Full Engagement Surveys to measure employee engagement.

    • Improve Employee Engagement to Drive IT Performance – Phase 1: Measure Employee Engagement
    • Engagement Strategy Record
    • Engagement Communication Template

    2. Analyze results and ideate solutions

    Understand the drivers of engagement that are important for your team, and involve your staff in brainstorming engagement initiatives.

    • Improve Employee Engagement to Drive IT Performance – Phase 2: Analyze Results and Ideate Solutions
    • Engagement Survey Results Interpretation Guide
    • Full Engagement Survey Focus Group Facilitation Guide
    • Pulse Engagement Survey Focus Group Facilitation Guide
    • Focus Group Facilitation Guide Driver Definitions
    • One-on-One Manager Meeting Worksheet

    3. Select and implement engagement initiatives

    Select engagement initiatives for maximal impact, create an action plan, and establish open and ongoing communication about engagement with your team.

    • Improve Employee Engagement to Drive IT Performance – Phase 3: Select and Implement Engagement Initiatives
    • Summary of Interdepartmental Engagement Initiatives
    • Engagement Progress One-Pager
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Build an IT Employee Engagement Program

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 (Preparation) Run Engagement Survey

    The Purpose

    Select and run your engagement survey prior to the workshop.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Receive an in-depth report on your team’s engagement drivers to form the basis of your engagement strategy.

    Activities

    1.1 Select engagement survey.

    1.2 Identify engagement program goals and metrics.

    1.3 Run engagement survey.

    Outputs

    Full or Pulse engagement survey report

    Engagement survey results interpretation guide

    2 Explore Engagement

    The Purpose

    To understand the current state of engagement and prepare to discuss the drivers behind it with your staff.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Empower your leadership team to take charge of their own teams’ engagement.

    Activities

    2.1 Review engagement survey results.

    2.2 Finalize focus group agendas.

    2.3 Train managers.

    Outputs

    Customized focus group agendas

    3 Hold Focus Groups

    The Purpose

    Establish an open dialogue with your staff to understand what would improve their engagement.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Employee-generated initiatives have the greatest chance at success.

    Activities

    3.1 Identify priority drivers.

    3.2 Identify engagement KPIs.

    3.3 Brainstorm engagement initiatives.

    3.4 Vote on initiatives within teams.

    Outputs

    Summary of focus groups results

    Identified engagement initiatives

    Identified engagement initiatives

    4 Select and Plan Initiatives

    The Purpose

    Learn the characteristics of successful engagement initiatives and build execution plans for each.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Choose initiatives with the greatest impact on your team’s engagement, and ensure you have the necessary resources for success.

    Activities

    4.1 Select engagement initiatives with IT leadership.

    4.2 Create initiative project plans.

    4.3 Present project plans.

    4.4 Define implementation checkpoints.

    4.5 Develop communications plan.

    4.6 Define strategy for ongoing engagement monitoring.

    Outputs

    Engagement project plans

    Implementation and communication checkpoints

    Further surveys planned (optional)

    5 Additional Leadership Training

    The Purpose

    Select training modules that best address your team’s needs from Info-Tech’s modular leadership training program.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Arm your IT leadership team with the key skills of effective leadership, tailored to their existing experience level.

    Activities

    5.1 Adopting an Integrated Leadership Mindset

    5.2 Optimizing Talent Leadership Practices

    5.3 Driving Diversity & Inclusion

    5.4 Fortifying Internal Stakeholder Relations

    5.5 Engaging Executives and the Board

    5.6 Crafting Your Leadership Brand

    5.7 Crafting and Delivering Compelling Presentations

    5.8 Communication & Difficult Conversations

    5.9 Conflict Management

    5.10 Performance Management

    5.11 Feedback & Coaching

    5.12 Creating a Culture of Personal Accountability

    Outputs

    Develop the skills to lead resourcefully in times of uncertainty

    Apply leadership behaviors across enterprise initiatives to deploy and develop talent successfully

    Develop diversity and inclusion practices that turn the IT function and leaders into transformative champions of inclusion

    Identify elements of effective partnering to maximize the impact of internal interactions

    Understand the major obstacles to CEO and board relevance and uncover the keys to elevating your internal executive profile

    Develop a leadership brand statement that demonstrates leadership competency and is aligned with the brand, mission, vision, and goals of the organization

    Identify the components of effective presentations and hone your presentation skills

    Gain the skills to confront and drive solutions from difficult situations

    Develop strategies to engage in conflict constructively and reach a resolution that benefits the team or organization

    Learn to identify the root causes of low performance and develop the skills to guide employees through the process of improvement

    Adopt a behavior-focused coaching model to help managers sustain and apply effective coaching principles

    Understand how and when to encourage autonomy and how to empower employees to take success into their own hands

    Sustain and Grow the Maturity of Innovation in Your Enterprise

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}91|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Innovation
    • Parent Category Link: /innovation
    • Customers are not waiting – they are insisting on change now. The recent litany of business failures and the ongoing demand for improved services means that “not in my backyard” will mean no backyard.
    • Positive innovation is about achieving tomorrow’s success today, where everyone is a leader and ideas and people can flourish – in every sector.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Many innovation programs are not delivering value at a time when change is constant and is impacting both public and private sector organizations.
    • Organizations are not well-positioned in terms of leadership skills to advance their innovation programs.
    • Unlock your innovation potential by looking at your innovation projects on both a macro and micro level.
    • Innovation capacity is directly linked with creativity; allow your employees' creativity to flourish using Info-Tech’s positive innovation techniques.
    • Innovations need to be re-harvested each year in order to maximize your return on investment.

    Impact and Result

    • From an opportunity perspective, create an effective innovation program that spawns more innovations, realizes benefits from existing assets not fully being leveraged, and lays the groundwork for enhanced products and services.
    • This complementary toolkit and method (to existing blueprints/research) guides you to assess the “aspiration level” of innovations and the innovation program, assess the resources/capabilities that an entity has to date employed in its innovation program, and position IT for success to achieve the strategic objectives of the enterprise.

    Sustain and Grow the Maturity of Innovation in Your Enterprise Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should formalize processes to improve your innovation program, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Scope and define

    Understand your current innovation capabilities and create a mandate for the future of your innovation program.

    • Sustain and Grow the Maturity of Innovation in Your Enterprise – Phase 1: Scope and Define
    • Innovation Program Mandate and Terms of Reference Template
    • Innovation Program Overview Presentation Template
    • Innovation Assessment Tool

    2. Assess and aspire

    Assess opportunities for your innovation program on a personnel and project level, and provide direction on how to improve along these dimensions.

    • Sustain and Grow the Maturity of Innovation in Your Enterprise – Phase 2: Assess and Aspire
    • Appreciative Inquiry Questionnaire

    3. Implement and inspire

    Formalize the innovation improvements you identified earlier in the blueprint by mapping them to your IT strategy.

    • Sustain and Grow the Maturity of Innovation in Your Enterprise – Phase 3: Implement and Inspire
    • Innovation Planning Tool
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Sustain and Grow the Maturity of Innovation in Your Enterprise

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Pre-Work

    The Purpose

    Gather data that will be analyzed in the workshop.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Information gathered with which analysis can be performed.

    Activities

    1.1 Do an inventory of innovations/prototypes underway.

    1.2 High-level overview of all existing project charters, and documentation of innovation program.

    1.3 Poll working group or key stakeholders in regards to scope of innovation program.

    Outputs

    Up-to-date inventory of innovations/prototypes

    Document review of innovation program and its results to date

    Draft scope of the innovation program and understanding of the timelines

    2 Scope and Define

    The Purpose

    Scope the innovation program and gain buy-in from major stakeholders.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Buy-in from IT steering committee for innovation program improvements.

    Activities

    2.1 Establish or re-affirm values for the program.

    2.2 Run an initial assessment of the organization’s innovation potential (macro level).

    2.3 Set/reaffirm scope and budget for the program.

    2.4 Define or refine goals and outcomes for the program.

    2.5 Confirm/re-confirm risk tolerance of organization.

    2.6 Update/document innovation program.

    2.7 Create presentation to gain support from the IT steering committee.

    Outputs

    Innovation program and terms of reference

    Presentation on organization innovation program for IT steering committee

    3 Assess and Aspire

    The Purpose

    Analyze the current performance of the innovation program and identify areas for improvement.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Identify actionable items that can be undertaken in order to improve the performance of the innovation program.

    Activities

    3.1 Assess your level of innovation per innovation project (micro level).

    3.2 Update the risk tolerance level of the program.

    3.3 Determine if your blend of innovation projects is ideal.

    3.4 Re-prioritize your innovation projects (if needed).

    3.5 Plan update to IT steering committee.

    3.6 Assess positive innovation assessment of team.

    3.7 Opportunity analysis of innovation program and team.

    Outputs

    Positive innovation assessment

    Re-prioritized innovation projects

    Updated presentation for IT steering committee

    4 Implement and Inspire

    The Purpose

    Formalize the innovation program by tying it into the IT strategy.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A formalized innovation program that is closely tied to the IT strategy.

    Activities

    4.1 Update business context in terms of impact on IT implications.

    4.2 Update IT strategy in terms of impact and benefits of innovation program.

    4.3 Update/create innovation program implementation plan.

    4.4 Plan update for IT steering committee.

    Outputs

    Updated business context

    Updated IT strategy

    Innovation implementation plan, including roadmap

    Updated presentation given to IT steering committee

    Align Projects With the IT Change Lifecycle

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}464|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Operations Management
    • Parent Category Link: /i-and-o-process-management
    • Coordinate IT change and project management to successfully push changes to production.
    • Manage representation of project management within the scope of the change lifecycle to gather requirements, properly approve and implement changes, and resolve incidents that arise from failed implementations.
    • Communicate effectively between change management, project management, and the business.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    Improvement can be incremental. You do not have to adopt every recommended improvement right away. Ensure every process change you make will create value and slowly add improvements to ease buy-in.

    Impact and Result

    • Establish pre-set touchpoints between IT change management and project management at strategic points in the change and project lifecycles.
    • Include appropriate project representation at the change advisory board (CAB).
    • Leverage standard change resources such as the change calendar and request for change form (RFC).

    Align Projects With the IT Change Lifecycle Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Align Projects With the IT Change Lifecycle Deck – A guide to walk through integrating project touchpoints in the IT change management lifecycle.

    Use this storyboard as a guide to align projects with your IT change management lifecycle.

    • Align Projects With the IT Change Lifecycle Storyboard

    2. The Change Management SOP – This template will ensure that organizations have a comprehensive document in place that can act as a point of reference for the program.

    Use this SOP as a template to document and maintain your change management practice.

    • Change Management Standard Operating Procedure
    [infographic]

    Further reading

    Align Projects With the IT Change Lifecycle

    Increase the success of your changes by integrating project touchpoints in the change lifecycle.

    Analyst Perspective

    Focus on frequent and transparent communications between the project team and change management.

    Benedict Chang

    Misalignment between IT change management and project management leads to headaches for both practices. Project managers should aim to be represented in the change advisory board (CAB) to ensure their projects are prioritized and scheduled appropriately. Advanced notice on project progress allows for fewer last-minute accommodations at implementation. Widespread access of the change calendar can also lead project management to effectively schedule projects to give change management advanced notice.

    Moreover, alignment between the two practices at intake allows for requests to be properly sorted, whether they enter change management directly or are governed as a project.

    Lastly, standardizing implementation and post-implementation across everyone involved ensures more successful changes and socialized/documented lessons learned for when implementations do not go well.

    Benedict Chang
    Senior Research Analyst, Infrastructure and Operations
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    Common Obstacles

    Info-Tech’s Approach

    To align projects with the change lifecycle, IT leaders must:

    • Coordinate IT change and project management to successfully push changes to production.
    • Manage representation of project management within the scope of the change lifecycle to gather requirements, properly approve and implement changes, and resolve incidents that arise from failed implementations.
    • Communicate effectively between change management, project management, and the business.

    Loose definitions may work for clear-cut examples of changes and projects at intake, but grey-area requests end up falling through the cracks.

    Changes to project scope, when not communicated, often leads to scheduling conflicts at go-live.

    Too few checkpoints between change and project management can lead to conflicts. Too many checkpoints can lead to delays.

    Set up touchpoints between IT change management and project management at strategic points in the change and project lifecycles.

    Include appropriate project representation at the change advisory board (CAB).

    Leverage standard change resources such as the change calendar and request for change form (RFC).

    Info-Tech Insight

    Improvement can be incremental. You do not have to adopt every recommended improvement right away. Ensure every process change you make will create value, and slowly add improvements to ease buy-in.

    Info-Tech’s approach

    Use the change lifecycle to identify touchpoints.

    The image contains a screenshot of Info-Tech's approach.

    The Info-Tech difference:

    1. Start with your change lifecycle to define how change control can align with project management.
    2. Make improvements to project-change alignment to benefit the relationship between the two practices and the practices individually.
    3. Scope the alignment to your organization. Take on the improvements to the left one by one instead of overhauling your current process.

    Use this research to improve your current process

    This deck is intended to align established processes. If you are just starting to build IT change processes, see the related research below.

    Align Projects With the IT Change Lifecycle

    02 Optimize IT Project Intake, Approval, and Prioritization

    01 Optimize IT Change Management

    Increase the success of your changes by integrating project touchpoints in your change lifecycle.

    (You are here)

    Decide which IT projects to approve and when to start them.

    Right-size IT change management to protect the live environment.

    Successful change management will provide benefits to both the business and IT

    Respond to business requests faster while reducing the number of change-related disruptions.

    IT Benefits

    Business Benefits

    • Fewer incidents and outages at project go-live
    • Upfront identification of project and change requirements
    • Higher rate of change and project success
    • Less rework
    • Fewer service desk calls related to failed go-lives
    • Fewer service disruptions
    • Faster response to requests for new and enhanced functionalities
    • Higher rate of benefits realization when changes are implemented
    • Lower cost per change
    • Fewer “surprise” changes disrupting productivity

    IT satisfaction with change management will drive business satisfaction with IT. Once the process is working efficiently, staff will be more motivated to adhere to the process, reducing the number of unauthorized changes. As fewer changes bypass proper evaluation and testing, service disruptions will decrease and business satisfaction will increase.

    Change management improves core benefits to the business: the four Cs

    Most organizations have at least some form of change control in place, but formalizing change management leads to the four Cs of business benefits:

    Control

    Collaboration

    Consistency

    Confidence

    Change management brings daily control over the IT environment, allowing you to review every relatively new change, eliminate changes that would have likely failed, and review all changes to improve the IT environment.

    Change management planning brings increased communication and collaboration across groups by coordinating changes with business activities. The CAB brings a more formalized and centralized communication method for IT.

    Request-for-change templates and a structured process result in implementation, test, and backout plans being more consistent. Implementing processes for pre-approved changes also ensures these frequent changes are executed consistently and efficiently.

    Change management processes will give your organization more confidence through more accurate planning, improved execution of changes, less failure, and more control over the IT environment. This also leads to greater protection against audits.

    1. Alignment at intake

    Define what is a change and what is a project.

    Both changes and projects will end up in change control in the end. Here, we define the intake.

    Changes and projects will both go to change control when ready to go live. However, defining the governance needed at intake is critical.

    A change should be governed by change control from beginning to end. It would typically be less than a week’s worth of work for a SME to build and come in at a nominal cost (e.g. <$20k over operating costs).

    Projects on the other hand, will be governed by project management in terms of scope, scheduling, resourcing, etc. Projects typically take over a week and/or cost more. However, the project, when ready to go live, should still be scheduled through change control to avoid any conflicts at implementation. At triage and intake, a project can be further scoped based on projected scale.

    This initial touchpoint between change control and project management is crucial to ensure tasks and request are executed with the proper governance. To distinguish between changes and projects at intake, list examples of each and determine what resourcing separates changes from projects.

    Need help scoping projects? Download the Project Intake Classification Matrix

    Change

    Project

    • Smaller scale task that typically takes a short time to build and test
    • Generates a single change request
    • Governed by IT Change Management for the entire lifecycle
    • Larger in scope
    • May generate multiple change requests
    • Governed by PMO
    • Longer to build and test

    Info-Tech Insight

    While effort and cost are good indicators of changes and projects, consider evaluating risk and complexity too.

    1 Define what constitutes a change

    1. As a group, brainstorm examples of changes and projects. If you wish, you may choose to also separate out additional request types such as service requests (user), operational tasks (backend), and releases.
    2. Have each participant write the examples on sticky notes and populate the following chart on the whiteboard/flip chart.
    3. Use the examples to draw lines and determine what defines each category.
    • What makes a change distinct from a project?
    • What makes a change distinct from a service request?
    • What makes a change distinct from an operational task?
    • When do the category workflows cross over with other categories? (For example, when does a project interact with change management?
  • Record the definitions of requests and results in section 2.3 of the Change Management Standard Operating Procedure (SOP).
  • Change

    Project

    Service Request (Optional)

    Operational Task (Optional)

    Release (Optional)

    Changing Configuration

    New ERP

    Add new user

    Delete temp files

    Software release

    Download the Change Management Standard Operating Procedure (SOP).

    Input Output
    • List of examples of each category of the chart
    • Definitions for each category to be used at change intake
    Materials Participants
    • Whiteboard/flip charts (or shared screen if working remotely)
    • Service catalog (if applicable)
    • Sticky notes
    • Markers/pens
    • Change Management SOP
    • Change Manager
    • Project Managers
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board

    2. Alignment at build and test

    Keep communications open by pre-defining and communicating project milestones.

    CAB touchpoints

    Consistently communicate the plan and timeline for hitting these milestones so CAB can prioritize and plan changes around it. This will give change control advanced notice of altered timelines.

    RFCs

    Projects may have multiple associated RFCs. Keeping CAB appraised of the project RFC or RFCs gives them the ability to further plan changes.

    Change Calendar

    Query and fill the change calendar with project timelines and milestones to compliment the CAB touchpoints.

    Leverage the RFC to record and communicate project details

    The request for change (RFC) form does not have to be a burden to fill out. If designed with value in mind, it can be leveraged to set standards on all changes (from projects and otherwise).

    When looking at the RFC during the Build and Test phase of a project, prioritize the following fields to ensure the implementation will be successful from a technical and user-adoption point of view.

    Filling these fields of the RFC and communicating them to the CAB at go-live approval gives the approvers confidence that the project will be implemented successfully and measures are known for when that implementation is not successful.

    Download the Request for Change Form Template

    Communication Plan

    The project may be successful from a technical point of view, but if users do not know about go-live or how to interact with the project, it will ultimately fail.

    Training Plan

    If necessary, think of how to train different stakeholders on the project go-live. This includes training for end users interacting with the project and technicians supporting the project.

    Implementation Plan

    Write the implementation plan at a high enough level that gives the CAB confidence that the implementation team knows the steps well.

    Rollback Plan

    Having a well-formulated rollback plan gives the CAB the confidence that the impact of the project is well known and the impact to the business is limited even if the implementation does not go well.

    Provide clear definitions of what goes on the change calendar and who’s responsible

    Inputs

    • Freeze periods for individual business departments/applications (e.g. finance month-end periods, HR payroll cycle, etc. – all to be investigated)
    • Maintenance windows and planned outage periods
    • Project schedules, and upcoming major/medium changes
    • Holidays
    • Business hours (some departments work 9-5, others work different hours or in different time zones, and user acceptance testing may require business users to be available)

    Guidelines

    • Business-defined freeze periods are the top priority.
    • No major or medium normal changes should occur during the week between Christmas and New Year’s Day.
    • Vendor SLA support hours are the preferred time for implementing changes.
    • The vacation calendar for IT will be considered for major changes.
    • Change priority: High > Medium > Low.
    • Minor changes and preapproved changes have the same priority and will be decided on a case-by-case basis.

    Roles

    • The Change Manager will be responsible for creating and maintaining a change calendar.
    • Only the Change Manager can physically alter the calendar by adding a new change after the CAB has agreed upon a deployment date.
    • All other CAB members, IT support staff, and other impacted stakeholders should have access to the calendar on a read-only basis to prevent people from making unauthorized changes to deployment dates.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Make the calendar visible to as many parties as necessary. However, limit the number of personnel who can make active changes to the calendar to limit calendar conflicts.

    3. Alignment at approval

    How can project management effectively contribute to CAB?

    As optional CAB members

    Project SMEs may attend when projects are ready to go live and when invited by the change manager. Optional members provide details on change cross-dependencies, high-level testing, rollback, communication plans, etc. to inform prioritization and scheduling decisions.

    As project management representatives

    Project management should also attend CAB meetings to report in on changes to ongoing projects, implementation timelines, and project milestones. Projects are typically high-priority changes when going live due to their impact. Advanced notice of timeline and milestone changes allow the rest of the CAB to properly manage other changes going into production.

    As core CAB members

    The core responsibilities of CAB must still be fulfilled:

    1. Protect the live environment from poorly assessed, tested, and implemented changes.

    2. Prioritize changes in a way that fairly reflects change impact, urgency, and likelihood.

    3. Schedule deployments in a way the minimizes conflict and disruption.

    If you need to define the authority and responsibilities of the CAB, see Activity 2.1.3 of the Optimize IT Change Management blueprint.

    4. Alignment at implementation

    At this stage, the project or project phase is treated as any other change.

    Verification

    Once the change has been implemented, verify that all requirements are fulfilled.

    Review

    Ensure all affected systems and applications are operating as predicted.

    Update change ticket and change log

    Update RFC status and CMDB as well (if necessary).

    Transition

    Once the change implementation is complete, it’s imperative that the team involved inform and train the operational and support groups.

    If you need to define transitioning changes to production, download Transition Projects to the Service Desk

    5. Alignment at post-implementation

    Tackle the most neglected portion of change management to avoid making the same mistake twice.

    1. Define RFC statuses that need a PIR
    2. Conduct PIRs for failed changes. Successful changes can simply be noted and transitioned to operations.

    3. Conduct a PIR for every failed change
    4. It’s best to perform a PIR once a change-related incident is resolved.

    5. Avoid making the same mistake twice
    6. Include a root-cause analysis, mitigation actions/timeline, and lessons learned in the documentation.

    7. Report to CAB
    8. Socialize the findings of the PIR at the subsequent CAB meeting.

    9. Circle back on previous PIRs
    10. If a similar change is conducted, append the related PIR to avoid the same mistakes.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Include your PIR documentation right in the RFC for easy reference.

    Download the RFC template for more details on post-implementation reviews

    2 Implement your alignments stepwise

    1. As a group, decide on which implementations you need to make to align change management and project management.
    2. For each improvement, list a timeline for implementation.
    3. Update section 3.5 in the Change Management Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). to outline the responsibilities of project management within IT Change Management.

    The image contains a screenshot of the Change Management SOP

    Download the Change Management Standard Operating Procedure (SOP).

    Input Output
    • This deck
    • SOP update
    Materials Participants
    • Whiteboard/flip charts (or shared screen if working remotely)
    • Service catalog (if applicable)
    • Sticky notes
    • Markers/pens
    • Change Management SOP
    • Change Manager
    • Project Managers
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board

    Related Info-Tech Research

    Optimize IT Change Management

    Right-size IT change management to protect the live environment.

    Optimize IT Project Intake, Approval, and Prioritization

    Decide which IT projects to approve and when to start them.

    Maintain an Organized Portfolio

    Align portfolio management practices with COBIT (APO05: Manage Portfolio).

    Optimize Applications Release Management

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}406|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.3/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $44,874 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 21 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Testing, Deployment & QA
    • Parent Category Link: /testing-deployment-and-qa
    • The business demands high service and IT needs to respond. Rapid customer response through efficient release and deployment is critical to maintain high business satisfaction.
    • The lack of process ownership leads to chaotic and uncoordinated releases, resulting in costly rework and poor hand-offs.
    • IT emphasizes tools but release tools and technologies alone will not fix the problem. Tools are integrated into the processes they support – if the process challenges aren’t addressed first, then the tool won’t help.
    • Releases are traditionally executed in silos with limited communication across the entire release pipeline. Culturally, there is little motivation for cross-functional collaboration and holistic process optimization.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Release management is not solely driven by tools. It is about delivering high quality releases on time through accountability and governance aided by the support of tools.
    • Release management is independent of your software development lifecycle (SDLC). Release management practices sit as an agnostic umbrella over your chosen development methodology.
    • Ownership of the entire process is vital. Release managers ensure standards are upheld and the pipeline operates efficiently.

    Impact and Result

    • Acquire release management ownership. Ensure there is appropriate accountability for speed and quality of the releases passing through the entire pipeline. A release manager has oversight over the entire release process and facilitates the necessary communication between business stakeholders and various IT roles.
    • Instill holistic thinking. Release management includes all steps required to push release and change requests to production along with the hand-off to Operations and Support. Increase the transparency and visibility of the entire pipeline to ensure local optimizations do not generate bottlenecks in other areas.
    • Standardize and lay a strong release management foundation. Optimize the key areas where you are experiencing the most pain and continually improve.

    Optimize Applications Release Management Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should optimize release management, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Review your release management objectives

    Assess the current state and define the drivers behind your release management optimizations.

    • Optimize Applications Release Management – Phase 1: Review Your Release Management Objectives
    • Release Management Process Standard Template
    • Release Management Maturity Assessment

    2. Standardize release management

    Design your release processes, program framework, and release change management standards, and define your release management team.

    • Optimize Applications Release Management – Phase 2: Standardize Release Management
    • Release Manager

    3. Roll out release management enhancements

    Create an optimization roadmap that fits your context.

    • Optimize Applications Release Management – Phase 3: Roll Out Release Management Enhancements
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Optimize Applications Release Management

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Review Your Release Management Objectives

    The Purpose

    Reveal the motivators behind the optimization of release management.

    Identify the root causes of current release issues and challenges.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Ensure business alignment of optimization efforts.

    Firm grasp of why teams are facing release issues and the impacts they have on the organization.

    Activities

    1.1 Identify the objectives for application release.

    1.2 Conduct a current state assessment of release practices.

    Outputs

    Release management business objectives and technical drivers

    Current state assessment of release processes, communication flows, and tools and technologies

    2 Standardize Release Management

    The Purpose

    Alleviate current release issues and challenges with best practices.

    Standardize a core set of processes, tools, and roles & responsibilities to achieve consistency, cadence, and transparency.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Repeatable execution of the same set of processes to increase the predictability of release delivery.

    Defined ownership of release management.

    Adaptable and flexible release management practices to changing business and technical environments.

    Activities

    2.1 Strengthen your release process.

    2.2 Coordinate releases with a program framework.

    2.3 Manage release issues with change management practices.

    2.4 Define your release management team.

    Outputs

    Processes accommodating each release type and approach the team is required to complete

    Release calendars and program framework

    Release change management process

    Defined responsibilities and accountabilities of release manager and release management team

    3 Roll Out Release Management Enhancements

    The Purpose

    Define metrics to validate release management improvements.

    Identify the degree of oversight and involvement of the release management team.

    Prioritize optimization roadmap against business needs and effort.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Easy-to-gather metrics to measure success that can be communicated to stakeholders.

    Understanding of how involved release management teams are in enforcing release management standards.

    Practical and achievable optimization roadmap.

    Activities

    3.1 Define your release management metrics.

    3.2 Ensure adherence to standards.

    3.3 Create your optimization roadmap.

    Outputs

    List of metrics to gauge success

    Oversight and reporting structure of release management team

    Release management optimization roadmap

    Secrets of SAP S-4HANA Licensing

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}231|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $25,000 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 10 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Vendor Management
    • Parent Category Link: /vendor-management
    • With the relatively slow uptake of the S/4HANA platform, the pressure is immense for SAP to maintain revenue growth.
    • SAP’s definitions and licensing rules are complex and vague, making it extremely difficult to purchase with confidence while remaining compliant.
    • Aggressive audit tactics may be used to speed up the move to HANA.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Mapping SAP products to HANA can be highly complex, leading to overspending and an inability to reduce future spend.
    • The deployment model chosen will directly impact commercial pathways forward.
    • Beware of digital (indirect) access licensing and compliance concerns.
    • Without having a holistic negotiation strategy, it is easy to hit a common obstacle and land into SAP’s playbook, requiring further spend.

    Impact and Result

    • Build a business case to evaluate S/4HANA.
    • Understand the S/4HANA roadmap and map current functionality to ensure compatibility.
    • Understand negotiating pricing and commercial terms.
    • Learn the “SAP way” of conducting business, which includes a best-in-class sales structure, unique contracts, and license use policies combined with a hyper-aggressive compliance function.

    Secrets of SAP S/4HANA Licensing Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should explore the secrets of SAP S/4HANA licensing, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Establish requirements

    Determining SAP’s fit within your organization is critical. Start off by building a business case to assess overarching drivers and justification for change, any net new business benefits and long-term sustainability. Oftentimes the ROI is negative, but the investment sets the stage for long-term growth.

    2. Evaluate licensing options

    Your deployment model is more important than you think. Selecting a deployment model will dictate your licensing options followed by your contractual pathways forward.

    • SAP License Summary and Analysis Tool
    • SAP Digital Access Licensing Pricing Tool

    3. Negotiation and license management

    Know what’s in the contract. Each customer agreement is different and there may be existing terms that are beneficial. Depending on how much is spent, anything can be up for negation.

    • SAP S/4HANA Terms and Conditions Evaluator
    [infographic]

    Reimagine Learning in the Face of Crisis

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}601|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Train & Develop
    • Parent Category Link: /train-and-develop
    • As organizations re-evaluate their priorities and shift to new ways of working, leaders and employees are challenged to navigate unchartered territory and to adjust quickly to ever-evolving priorities.
    • Learning how to perform effectively through the crisis and deliver on new priorities is crucial to the success of all employees and the organization.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    The most successful organizations recognize that learning is critical to adjusting quickly and effectively to their new reality. This requires L&D to reimagine their approach to deliver learning that enables the organization’s immediate and evolving priorities.

    Impact and Result

    • L&D teams should focus on how to support employees and managers to develop the critical competencies they need to successfully perform through the crisis, enabling organizations to survive and thrive during and beyond the crisis.
    • Ensure learning needs align closely with evolving organizational priorities, collaborate cross-functionally, and curate content to provide the learning employees and leaders need most, when they need it.

    Reimagine Learning in the Face of Crisis Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Prioritize

    Involve key stakeholders, identify immediate priorities, and conduct high-level triage of L&D.

    • Reimagine Learning in the Face of Crisis Storyboard
    • Reimagine Learning in the Face of Crisis Workbook

    2. Reimagine

    Determine learning needs and ability to realistically deliver learning. Leverage existing or curate learning content that can support learning needs.

    3. Transform

    Identify technical requirements for the chosen delivery method and draft a four- to six-week action plan.

    • How to Curate Guide
    • Tips for Building an Online Learning Community
    • Ten Tips for Adapting In-Person Training During a Crisis
    • Tips for Remote Learning in the Face of Crisis
    [infographic]

    Design an Enterprise Architecture Strategy

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}580|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.4/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $63,181 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 30 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Strategy & Operating Model
    • Parent Category Link: /strategy-and-operating-model
    • The enterprise architecture (EA) team is constantly challenged to articulate the value of its function.
    • The CIO has asked the EA team to help articulate the business value the team brings.
    • Traceability from the business goals and vision to the EA contributions often does not exist.
    • Also, clients often struggle with complexity, priorities, and agile execution.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • EA can deliver many benefits to an organization. However, to increase the likelihood of success, the EA group needs to deliver value to the business and cannot be seen solely as IT.
    • Support from the organization is needed.
    • An EA strategy anchored in a value proposition will ensure that EA focuses on driving the most critical outcomes in support of the organization’s enterprise strategy.
    • As agility is not just for project execution, architects need to understand ways to deliver their guidance to influence project execution in real time, to enable the enterprise agility, and to enhance their responsiveness to changing conditions.

    Impact and Result

    • Create an EA value proposition based on enterprise needs that clearly articulates the expected contributions of the EA function.
    • Establish the EA fundamentals (vision and mission statement, goals and objectives, and principles) needed to position the EA function to deliver the promised value proposition.
    • Identify the services that EA has to provide to the organization to deliver on the promised value proposition.

    Design an Enterprise Architecture Strategy Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Design an Enterprise Architecture Strategy Deck – A guide to help you define services that your EA function will provide to the organization.

    Establish an effective EA function that will realize value for the organization with an EA strategy.

    • Design an Enterprise Architecture Strategy – Phases 1-4

    2. EA Function Strategy Template – A communication tool to secure the approval of the EA strategy from organizational stakeholders.

    Use this template to document the outputs of the EA strategy and to communicate the EA strategy for approval by stakeholders.

    • EA Function Strategy Template

    3. Stakeholder Power Map Template – A template to help visualize the importance of various stakeholders and their concerns.

    Identify and prioritize the stakeholders that are important to your IT strategy development effort.

    • Stakeholder Power Map Template

    4. PESTLE Analysis Template – A template to help you complete and document a PESTLE analysis.

    Use this template to analyze the effect of external factors on IT.

    • PESTLE Analysis Template

    5. EA Value Proposition Template – A template to communicate the value EA can provide to the organization.

    Use this template to create an EA value proposition that explicitly communicates to stakeholders how an EA function can contribute to addressing their needs.

    • EA Value Proposition Template

    6. EA Goals and Objectives Template – A template to identify the EA goals that support the identified promises of value from the EA value proposition.

    Use this template to help set goals for your EA function based on the EA value proposition and identify objectives to measure the progression towards those EA goals.

    • EA Goals and Objectives Template

    7. EA Principles Template – A template to identify the universal EA principles relevant to your organization.

    Use this template to define relevant universal EA principles and create new EA principles to guide and inform IT investment decisions.

    • EA Principles Template – EA Strategy

    8. EA Service Planning Tool – A template to identify the EA services your organization will provide to deliver on the EA value proposition.

    Use this template to identify the EA services relevant to your organization and then define how those services will be accessed.

    • EA Service Planning Tool
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Design an Enterprise Architecture Strategy

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Map the EA Contributions to Business Goals

    The Purpose

    Show an example of traceability.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Members have a real-world example of traceability between business goals and EA contributions.

    Activities

    1.1 Start from the business goals of the organization.

    1.2 Document business and IT drivers.

    1.3 Identify EA contributions that help achieve the business goals.

    Outputs

    Business goals documented.

    Business and IT drivers documented.

    Identified EA contributions and traced them to business goals.

    2 Determine the Role of the Architect in the Agile Ceremonies of the Organization

    The Purpose

    Create an understanding about role of architect in Agile ceremonies.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Understanding of the role of the EA architect in Agile ceremonies.

    Activities

    2.1 Document the Agile ceremony used in the organization (based on SAFe or other Agile approaches).

    2.2 Determine which ceremonies the system architect will participate in.

    2.3 Determine which ceremonies the solution architect will participate in.

    2.4 Determine which ceremonies the enterprise architect will participate in.

    2.5 Determine architect syncs, etc.

    Outputs

    Documented the Agile ceremonial used in the organization (based on SAFe or other Agile approaches).

    Determined which ceremonies the system architect will participate in.

    Determined which ceremonies the solution architect will participate in.

    Determined which ceremonies the enterprise architect will participate in.

    Determined architect syncs, etc.

    Further reading

    Design an Enterprise Architecture Strategy

    Develop a strategy that fits the organization’s maturity and remains adaptable to unforeseen future changes.

    EXECUTIVE BRIEF

    Build a right-size enterprise architecture strategy

    Enterprise Architecture Strategy

    Business & IT Strategy
    • Organizational Goals and Objectives
    • Business Drivers
    • Environment and Industry Trends
    • EA Capabilities and Services
    • Business Architecture
    • Data Architecture
    • Application Architecture
    • Integration Architecture
    • Innovation
    • Roles and Organizational Structure
    • Security Architecture
    • Technology Architecture
    • Integration Architecture
    • Insight and Knowledge
    • EA Operating Model
    Unlock the Value of Architecture
    • Increased Business and IT Alignment
    • Robust, Flexible, Scalable, Interoperable, Extensible and Reliable Solutions
    • Timely/Agile Service Delivery and Operations
    • Cost-Effective Solutions
    • Appropriate Risk Management to Address the Risk Appetite
    • Increased Competitive Advantage
    Current Environment
    • Business and IT Challenges
    • Opportunities
    • Enterprise Architecture Maturity

    Enterprise Architecture – Thought Model

    A thought model built around 'Enterprise Architecture', represented by a diagram on a cross-section of a ship which will be explained in the next slide. It begins with an arrow that says 'Organizational goals are the driving force and the ultimate goal' pointing to a bubble titled 'Organization' containing 'Analysis', 'Decisions', 'Actions'. An blue arrow on the right side with one '$' is labelled 'Iterations' and connects 'Organization' to 'Enterprise Architecture', 'Enterprise architecture creates new business value'. A green arrow on the left side with five '$' is labelled 'Goals' and connects back to 'Organization'. A the bottom, a bubble titled 'External forces, pressures, trends, data, etc.' has a blue arrow on the right side with one '$' connecting back to 'Enterprise Architecture'. Another blue arrow representing an output is labelled 'Outcomes' and originates from 'Enterprise Architecture'.

    Enterprise Architecture Capabilities

    A diagram on a cross-section of a ship representing 'Enterprise Architecture', including a row of process arrows beneath the ship pointing forward all labelled 'Agile iteration' and one airborne arrow above the stern pointing forward labelled 'Business Strategy'. Overlaid on the ship, starting at the back, are 'EA Strategy', 'EA Operating Model', 'Enterprise Principles, Methods, etc.', 'Foundational enterprise decisions: Business, Data/Apps, Technology, Integration, Security', 'Enterprise Reference Architecture', 'Goals, Value Chain, Capability, Business Processes', 'Enterprise Governance (e.g., Standard Mgmt.)', 'Domain Arch', 'Data & App Architecture', 'Security Architecture', 'Infrastructure: Cloud, Hybrid, etc.', at the very front is 'Implementation', and running along the bottom from back to front is 'Operations, Monitoring, and Continuous Improvement'.

    Analyst Perspective

    Enterprise architecture (EA) needs to be right-sized for the needs of the organization.

    Photo of Milena Litoiu, Principal/Senior Director, Enterprise Architecture, Info-Tech Research Group

    Enterprise architecture is NOT a one-size-fits-all endeavor. It needs to be right-sized to the needs of the organization.

    Enterprise architects are boots on the ground and part of the solution; in addition, they need to have a good understanding of the corporate strategy, vision, and goals and have a vested interest on the optimization of the outcomes for the enterprise. They also need to anticipate the moves ahead, to be able to determine future trends and how they will impact the enterprise.

    Milena Litoiu
    Principal/Senior Director, Enterprise Architecture
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Analyst Perspective

    EA provides business options based on a deep understanding of the organization.

    “Enterprise architects need to think about and consider different areas of expertise when formulating potential business options. By understanding the context, the puzzle pieces can combine to create a positive business outcome that aligns with the organization’s strategies. Sometimes there will be missing pieces; leveraging what you know to create an outline of the pieces and collaborating with others can provide a general direction.”

    Jean Bujold
    Senior Workshop Delivery Director
    Info-Tech Research Group

    “The role of enterprise architecture is to eliminate misalignment between the business and IT and create value for the organization.”

    Reddy Doddipalli
    Senior Workshop Director, Research
    Info-Tech Research Group

    “Every transformation journey is an opportunity to learn: ‘Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.’ Benjamin Franklin.”

    Graham Smith
    Senior Lead Enterprise Architect and Independent Consultant

    Develop an enterprise architecture strategy that:

    • Helps the organization make decisions that are hard to change in a complex environment.
    • Fits the current organization’s maturity and remains flexible and adaptable to unforeseen future changes.

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    We need to make decisions today for an unknown future. Decisions are influenced by:

    • Changes in the environment you operate in.
    • Complexity of both the business and IT landscapes.
    • IT’s difficulty in keeping up with business demands and remaining agile.
    • Program/project delivery pressure and long-term planning needs.
    • Other internal and external factors affecting your enterprise.

    Common Obstacles

    Decisions are often made:

    • Without a clear understanding of the business goals.
    • Without a holistic understanding; sometimes in conflict with one another.
    • That hinder the continuity of the organization.
    • That prevent value optimization at the enterprise level.

    The more complex an organization, the more players involved, the more difficult it is to overcome these obstacles.

    Info-Tech’s Approach

    • Is a holistic, top-down approach, from the business goals all the way to implementation.
    • Has EA act as the canary in the coal mine. EA will identify and mitigate risks in the organization.
    • Enables EA to provide an essential service rather than be an isolated kingdom or an ivory tower.
    • Acknowledges that EA is a balancing act among competing demands.
    • Makes decisions using guiding principles and guardrails, to create a flexible architecture that can evolve and expand, enabling enterprise agility.

    Info-Tech Insight

    There is no “right architecture” for organizations of all sizes, maturities, and cultural contexts. The value of enterprise architecture can only be measured against the business goals of a single organization. Enterprise architecture needs to be right-sized for your organization.

    Info-Tech insight summary on arch. agility

    Continuous innovation is of paramount importance in achieving and maintaining competitive advantage in the marketplace.

    Business engagement

    It is important to trace architectural decisions to business goals. As business goals evolve, architecture should evolve as well.

    As new business input is provided during Agile cycles, architecture is continuously evolving.

    EA fundamentals

    EA fundamentals will shape how enterprise architects think and act, how they engage with the organization, what decisions they make, etc.

    Start small and lean and evolve as needed.

    Continuously align strategy with delivery and operations.

    Architects should establish themselves as business partners as well as implementation/delivery leaders.

    Enterprise services

    Definitions of enterprise services should start from the business goals of the organization and the capabilities IT needs to perform for the organization to survive in the marketplace.

    Continuous delivery and continuous innovation are the two facets of architecture.

    Tactical insight

    Your current maturity should be reflected as a baseline in the strategy.

    Tactical insight

    Take Agile/opportunistic steps toward your strategic North star.

    Tactical insight

    EA services differ based on goals, maturity, and the Agile appetite of the enterprise.

    From the best industry experts

    “The trick to getting value from enterprise architecture is to commit to the long haul.”

    Jeanne W. Ross, MIT CISR
    Co-author of Enterprise Architecture as Strategy: Creating a Foundation for Business Execution,
    Harvard Business Press, 2006.

    Typical EA maturity stages

    A line chart that moves through multiple stages titled 'Enterprise Architecture Maturity Stages (MIT CISR)' The five stages of the chart, starting on the left, are 'Business Silos', 'Standardized Technology', 'Optimized Core', 'Business Componentization', and 'Digital Ecosystem'. 'The trick to getting value from enterprise architecture is to commit to the long haul.' The line begins at the bottom left of the chart and gradually creates a stretched S shape to the top right. Points along the line, respective to the aforementioned stages, are 'Locally Optimal Business Solutions', 'Technology Infrastructure Platform', 'Digitized Process Platform', 'Repository of Reusable Business Components', 'Components Connecting with Partners' Components', and at the end of the line, outside of the chart is 'Strategic Business Value from Technology'. Percentages along the bottom, respective to the aforementioned stages, read 20%, 36%, 45%, 7%, 2%. Percentages are rough approximations based on findings reported in Mocker, M., Ross, J.W., Beath, C.M., 'How Companies Use Digital Technologies to Enhance Customer Offerings--Summary of Survey Findings,' MIT CISR Working Paper No. 434, Feb. 2019. Copyright MIT, 2019.

    Enterprise Architecture maturity

    A maturity ladder visualization for 'Enterprise Architecture' with five color-coded levels. From the bottom up, the colors and designations are Red: 'Unstable', Orange: 'Firefighter', Yellow: 'Trusted Operator', Blue: 'Business Partner', and Green: 'Innovator'. Beside the visualization at the bottom it says 'EA is here', then an arrow in the direction of the top where it says 'EA needs to be here'.
    • Innovator – Transforms the Business
      Reliable Technology Innovation
    • Business Partner – Expands the Business
      Effective Use of Enterprise Architecture in all Business Projects, Enterprise Architecture Is Strategically Engaged
    • Trusted Operator – Optimizes the Business
      Enterprise Architecture Provides Business, Data, Application & Technology Architectures for All IT Projects
    • Firefighter – Supports the Business
      Reliable Architecture for Some Practices/Projects
    • Unstable – Struggles to Support
      Inability to Provide Reliable Architectures

    Info-Tech Insight

    There is no “absolute maturity” for organizations of all sizes, maturities, and cultural contexts. The maturity of enterprise architecture can only be measured against the business goals of the organization.

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    Guided Implementation

    Workshop

    Consulting

    "Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful." "Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track." "We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place." "Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project."

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

    Workshop Overview

    Contact your account representative for more information.
    workshops@infotech.com1-888-670-8889

    Session 1 Session 2 Session 3 Session 4 Session 5
    Activities
    Identify organizational needs and landscape

    1.0 Interview stakeholders to identify business and technology needs

    1.1 Review organization perspective, including business needs, challenges, and strategic directions

    1.2 Conduct PESTLE analysis to identify business and technology trends

    1.3 Conduct SWOT analysis to identify business and technology internal perspective

    Create the EA value proposition

    2.1 Identify and prioritize EA stakeholders

    2.2 Create business and technology drivers from needs

    2.3 Define the EA value proposition

    2.4 Identify EA maturity and target

    Define the EA fundamentals

    3.1 Define the EA goals and objectives

    3.2 Determine EA scope

    3.3 Create a set of EA principles

    3.4. Define the need of a methodology/agility

    3.5 Create the EA vision and mission statement

    Identify the EA framework and communicate the EA strategy

    4.1 Define initial EA operating model and governance mechanism

    4.2 Define the activities and services the EA function will provide, derived from business goals

    4.3 Determine effectiveness measures

    4.4 Create EA roadmap and next steps

    4.5 Build communication plan for stakeholders

    Next Steps and Wrap-Up (offsite)

    5.1 Generate workshop report

    5.2 Set up review time for workshop report and to discuss next steps

    Outcomes
    1. Stakeholder insights
    2. Organizational needs, challenges, and direction summary
    3. PESTLE & SWOT analysis
    1. Stakeholder power map
    2. List of business and technology drivers with associated pains
    3. Set of EA contributions articulating the promises of value in the EA value proposition
    4. EA maturity assessment
    1. EA scope
    2. List of EA principles
    3. EA vision statement
    4. EA mission statement
    5. Statement about role of enterprise architect relative to agility
    1. EA capabilities mapped to business goals of the organization
    2. List of EA activities and services the EA function is committed to providing
    3. KPI definitions
    4. EA roadmap
    5. EA communication plan
    1. Completed workshop report on EA strategy with roadmap, recommendations, and outcomes from workshop

    Guided Implementation

    A Guided Implementation (GI) is a series of calls with an Info-Tech analyst to help implement our best practices in your organization.

    A typical GI is 8 to 12 calls over the course of 4 to 6 months.

    While variations depend on the maturity of the organization as well as its aspirations, these are some typical steps:

      Phase 1

    • Call #1: Explore the role of EA in your organization.
    • Phase 2

    • Call #2: Identify and prioritize stakeholders.
    • Call #3: Use a PESTLE analysis to identify business and technology needs.
    • Call #4: Prepare for stakeholder interviews.
    • Call #5: Discuss your EA value proposition.
    • Phase 3

    • Call #5: Understand the importance of EA fundamentals.
    • Call #6: Define the relevant EA services and their contributions to the organization.
    • Call #7: Measure EA effectiveness.
    • Phase 4

    • Call #8: Build your EA roadmap and communication plan.
    • Call #9: Discuss the EA role relative to agility.
    • Call #10: Summarize results and plan next steps.

    Design an Enterprise Architecture Strategy

    Phase 1

    Explore the Role of Enterprise Architecture

    Phase 1

    • 1.1 Explore a general EA strategy approach
    • 1.2 Introduce Agile EA architecture

    Phase 2

    • 2.1 Define the business and technology drivers
    • 2.2 Define your value proposition

    Phase 3

    • 3.1 Realize the importance of EA fundamentals
    • 3.2 Finalize the EA fundamentals

    Phase 4

    • 4.1 Select relevant EA services
    • 4.2 Finalize the set of services and secure approval

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    Define the role of the group and different roles inside the enterprise architecture competency.

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • CIO
    • IT Leaders
    • Business Leaders

    Enterprise architecture optimizes the outcomes of the entire organization

    Corporate Strategy –› Enterprise Architecture Strategy

    Info-Tech Insight

    Enterprise architecture needs to have input from the corporate strategy of the organization. Similarly, EA governance needs to be informed by corporate governance. If this is not the case, it is like planning and governing with your eyes closed.

    Existing EA functions vary in the value they achieve due to their level of maturity

    EA Functions
    Operationalized
    • EA function is operationalized and operates as an effective core function.
    • Effectively aligns the business and IT through governance, communication, and engagement.
    –––› Common EA value
    Decreased cost Reduced risk
    Emerging
    • Emerging but limited ad hoc EA function.
    • Limited by lack of alignment to the business and IT.
    –x–› Cut through complexity Increased agility
    (Source: Booz & Co., 2009)

    Benefits of enterprise architecture

    1. Focuses on business outcomes (business centricity)
    2. Provides traceability of architectural decisions to/from business goals
    3. Provides ways to measure results
    4. Provides consistency across different lines of business: establishes a common vocabulary, reducing inconsistencies
    5. Reduces duplications, creating additional efficiencies at the enterprise level
    6. Presents an actionable migration to the strategy/vision, through short-term milestones/steps

    Benefits of enterprise architecture continued

    1. Done right, increases agility
    2. Done right, reduces costs
    3. Done right, mitigates risks
    4. Done right, stimulates innovation
    5. Done right, helps achieve the stated business goals (e.g. customer satisfaction) and improves the enterprise agility.
    6. Done right, enhances competitive advantage of the enterprise

    Qualities of a well-established and practical enterprise architecture

    1. Objective
    2. Impartial
    3. Credible
    4. Practical
    5. Measurable
    6. (Source: University of Toronto, 2021)

    Role of the enterprise architecture

    • Primarily to set up guardrails for the enterprise, so Agile teams work independently in a safe, ready-to-integrate environment
    • Establish strategy
    • Establish priorities
    • Continuously innovate
    • Establish enterprise standards and enterprise guardrails to guide Solution/Domain/Portfolio Architectures
    • Align with and be informed by the organization’s direction

    Members of the Architecture Board:

    • Chief (Business) Strategist
    • Lead Enterprise Architect
    • Business SME from each major domain
    • IT SME from each major domain
    • Operational & Infrastructure SME
    • Security & Risk Officer
    • Process Management
    • Other relevant stakeholders

    For enterprise architecture to contribute, EA must address the organizational vision and goals

    External Factors –› Layers of a Business Model
    (Organization)
    –› Architecture Supported Transformation
    Industry Changes Business Strategy
    Competition Value Streams
    (Business Outcomes)
    Regulatory Impacts Business Capability Maps
    • Security
    Workforce Impacts Execution
    • Policies
    • Processes
    • People
    • Information
    • Applications
    • Technology

    Info-Tech Insight

    External forces can affect the organization as a whole; they need to be included as part of the holistic approach for enterprise architecture.

    How does EA provide value?

    Business and Technology Drivers – A set of statements created from business and technology needs. Gathered from information sources, it communicates improvements needed.

    • Vision, Aspirations, Long-Term Goals – Vision, aspirations, long term goals

      • EA Contributions – EA contributions that will alleviate obstructions. Removing the obstructions will allow EA to help satisfy business and technology needs.

        • Promise of Value – A statement that depicts a concrete benefit that the EA practice can provide for the organization in response to business and technology drivers.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Enterprise architecture needs to create and be part of a culture where decisions are made through collaboration while focusing on enterprise-wide efficiencies (e.g. reduced duplication, reusability, enterprise-wide cost minimization, overall security, comprehensive risk mitigation, and any other cross-cutting concerns) to optimize corporate business goals.

    The EA function scope is influenced by the EA value proposition and previously developed EA fundamentals

    Establish the EA function scope by using the EA value proposition and EA fundamentals that have already been developed. After defining the EA function scope, refer back to these statements to ensure it accurately reflects the EA value proposition and EA fundamentals.

    EA value proposition

    +

    EA vision statement
    EA mission statement
    EA goals and objectives

    —›
    Influences

    Organizational coverage

    Architectural domains

    Depth

    Time horizon

    —›
    Defines
    EA function scope

    EA team characteristics

    Create the optimal EA strategy by including personnel who understand a broad set of topics in the organization

    The team assembled to create the EA strategy will be defined as the “EA strategy creation team” in this blueprint.

    • Someone who has been in the organization for a long time and has built strong relationships with key stakeholders. This individual can exert influence and become the EA strategy sponsor.
    • An individual who understands how the different technology components in the organization support its business operations.
    • Someone in the organization who can communicate IT concepts to business managers in a language the business understands.
    • An individual with a strategy background or perspective on the organization. This individual will understand where the organization is headed.
    • Any individuals who feel an acute pain as a result of poorly made investment decisions. They can be champions of EA strategy in their respective functions.

    EA skills and competencies

    Apart from business know-how, the EA team should have the following skills

    • Architectural thinking
    • Analytical
    • Trusted, credible
    • Can handle complexity
    • Can change perspectives
    • Can learn fast (business and technology)
    • Independent and steadfast
    • Not afraid to go against the stream
    • Able to understand problems of others with empathy
    • Able to estimate scaling on design decisions such as model patterns
    • Intrinsic capability to identify where relevant details are
    • Able to identify root causes quickly
    • Able to communicate complex issues clearly
    • Able to negotiate and come up with acceptable solutions
    • Can model well
    • Able to change perspectives (from business to implementation and operational perspectives).

    Use of enterprise architecture methodologies

    Balance EA methodologies with Agile approaches

    Using an enterprise architecture methodology is a good starting point to achieving a common understanding of what that is. Often, organizations agree to "tailor" methodologies to their needs.

    The use of lean/Agile approaches will increase efficiency beyond traditional methodologies.

    Use of EA methodologies vs. Agile methods

    When to use what?

    • Use an existing methodology to structure your thinking and establish a common vocabulary to communicate basic concepts, processes, and approaches.
    • Customize the methodology to your needs; make it as lean as possible.
    • Execute in an Agile way, but keep in mind the thoughtful checks recommended by your end-to-end methodology.
    • Clarify goals.
    • Have good measures and metrics in place.
    • Continuously monitor progress, fit for purpose, etc.
    • Highlight risks, roadblocks, etc.
    • Get support.
    • Communicate vision, goals, key decisions, etc.
    • Iterate.

    Business strategy first, EA strategy second, and EA operating model third

    Corporate Strategy
    “Why does our enterprise exist in the market?”
    EA Strategy
    “What does EA need to be and do to support the enterprise’s ability to meet its goals? What is EA’s value proposition?”
    Business & IT Operating Culture
    “How does the organization’s culture and structure influence the EA operating model?”
    EA Operating Model
    How does EA need to operate on a daily basis to deliver the value proposition?”

    High-level perspective

    Creating an effective practice involves many moving parts.

    A visual of the many moving parts in an effective practice; there are 6 smaller circles in a large circle, an input arrow labelled 'Environment', an output arrow labelled 'Results', and a thin arrow connecting 'Results' back to 'Environment'. Of the circles, 'Leadership' is in the center, connected to each of the others, while 'Culture', 'Strategy', 'Core Processes', 'Structure', and 'Systems' create a cycle. (Source: The Center for Organizational Design)

    • Environment. Influences that are external to the organization, such as customer perceptions, changing needs, and changes in technology, and the organization’s ability to adjust to them.
    • Strategy. The business strategy defines how the organization adds value and acts as the rudder to direct the organization. Organizational strategy defines the character of the organization, what it wants to be, its values, its vision, its mission, etc.
    • Core Process. The flow of work through the organization.
    • Structure. How people are organized around business processes. Includes reporting structures, boundaries, roles, and responsibilities. The structure should assist the organization with achieving its goals rather than hinder its performance.
    • Systems. Interrelated sets of tasks or activities that help organize and coordinate work.
    • Culture. The personality of the organization: its leadership style, attitudes, habits, and management practices. Culture measures how well philosophy is translated into practice.
    • Results. Measurement of how well the organization achieved its goals.
    • Leadership. Brings the organization together by providing vision and strategy; designing, monitoring, and nurturing the culture; and fostering agility.

    The answer to the strategic planning entity dilemma is enterprise architecture

    Enterprise architecture is a discipline that defines the structure and operation of an organization. The intent of enterprise architecture is to determine how an organization can most effectively achieve its current and future objectives.

    Vision, goals, and aspirations as well internal and external pressures

    Business current state

    • Existing capability
    • Existing capability
    • Existing capability
    • Existing capability
    • Existing capability
    Enterprise Architecture

    IT current state

    • IT asset management
    • Database services
    • Application development

    Business target state

    • Existing capability
    • Existing capability
    • Existing capability
    • Existing capability
    • Existing capability
    • New capability

    IT target state

    • IT asset management
    • Database services
    • Application development
    • Business analytics
    Complex, overlapping, contradictory world of humans vs. logical binary world of IT
    EA is a planning tool to help achieve the corporate business goals

    EA spans across all the domains of architecture

    Business architecture is the cornerstone that sets the foundation for all other architectural domains: security, data, application, and technology.

    A flow-like diagram titled 'Enterprise Architecture' beginning with 'Digital Architecture' and 'Business Architecture', which feeds into 'Security Architecture', which feeds into both 'Data Architecture' and 'Application Architecture', which both feed into 'Technology Architecture: Infrastructure'.

    “An enterprise architecture practice is both difficult and costly to set up. It is normally built around a process of peer review and involves the time and talent of the strategic technical leadership of an enterprise.” (The Open Group Architecture Framework, 2018)

    Enterprise architecture deployment continuum

    A diagram visualizing the Enterprise architecture deployment continuum with two continuums, 'Level of Embedding' and 'EA Value', assigning terms to EA deployments based on where they fall. On the left is an 'Ivory Tower' configuration: EA' is separated from the 'BU's but is still controlling them. Level of Embedding: 'Centralized', EA Value: 'Dictatorship'. In the center is a 'Balanced' configuration: 'EA' is spread across and connected to each 'BU'. Level of Embedding: 'Federated', EA Value: 'Democracy'. On the right is a 'Siloed' configuration: Each 'BU' has its own separate 'EA'. Level of Embedding: 'Decentralized', EA Value: 'Abdication of enterprise role'.

    Info-Tech Insight

    The primary question during the design of the EA operating model is how to integrate the EA function with the rest of the business.

    If the EA practice functions on its own, you end up with ivory tower syndrome and a dictatorship.

    If you totally embed the EA function within business units it will become siloed with no enterprise value.

    Organizations need to balance consistency at the enterprise level with creativity from the grass roots.

    Enterprise vs. Program/Portfolio/Domain

    Enterprise vs. Program/Portfolio/Domain. Image depicts where Enterprise Scope overlaps Program/Portfolio Scope. Enterprise Scope includes Business Architecture. Program/Portfolio Scope includes Business Requirements, Business Process, and Solutions Architecture. Overlap between scope includes Technology Architecture, Data Architecture, and Applications Architecture.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Decisions at the enterprise level apply across multiple programs/portfolios/solutions and represent the guardrails set for all to play within.

    Decide on the degree of centralization

    Larger organizations with multiple domains/divisions or business units will need to decide which architecture functions will be centralized and which, if any, will be decentralized as they plan to scope their EA program. What are the core functions to be centralized for the EA to deliver the greatest benefits?

    Typically, we see a need to have a centralized repository of reusable assets and standards across the organization, while other approaches/standards can operate locally.

    Centralization

    • Allows for more strategic planning
    • Visibility into standards and assets across the organization promotes rationalization and cost savings
    • Ensures enterprise-wide assets are used
    • More strategic sourcing of vendors and resellers
    • Can centrally negotiate pricing for better deals
    • Easier to manage risk and prepare for audits
    • Greater coordination of resources
    • Derives benefits from enterprise decisions, e.g. integration…

    Decentralization

    • May allow for more innovation
    • May be easier to demonstrate local compliance if the organization is geographically decentralized
    • May be easier to procure software if offices are in different countries
    • Deployment and installation of software on user devices may be easier

    EA strategy

    What is the role of enterprise architecture vis-à-vis business goals?

    • What needs to be done?
    • Who needs to be involved?
    • When?
    • Where?
    • Why?
    • How?

    Top-down approach starting from the goals of the organization

      What the Business Sees...
    • Business Goals
      • Value Streams
          What the CxO Sees...
        • Capabilities
            What the App Managers See...
          • Processes
            • Applications
                What the Program Managers See...
              • Programs/Projects

    Info-Tech Insight

    Being able to answer the deceptively simple question “How am I doing?” requires traceability to and from the business goals to be achieved all the way to applications, to infrastructure, and ultimately, to the funded initiatives (portfolios, programs, projects, etc.).

    Measure EA strategy effectiveness by tracking the benefits it provides to the corporate business goals

    The success of the EA function spans across three main dimensions:

    1. The delivery of EA-enabled business outcomes that are most important to the enterprise.
    2. The alignment between the business and the technology from a planning perspective.
    3. Improvements in the corporate business goals due to EA contributions (standardization, rationalization, reuse, etc.).

    Corporate Business Goals

    • Reduction in operating costs
    • Decreased regulatory compliance infractions
    • Increased revenue from existing channels
    • Increased revenue from new channels
    • Faster time to business value
    • Improved business agility
    • Reduction in enterprise risk exposure

    EA Contributions

    • Alignment of IT investments to business strategy
    • Achievement of business results directly linked to IT involvement
    • Application and platform rationalization
    • Standards in place
    • Flexible architecture
    • Better integration
    • Higher organizational satisfaction with technology-enabled services and solutions

    Measurements

    • Cost reductions based on application and platform rationalization
    • Time and cost reductions due to standardization
    • Time reduction for integration
    • Service reused
    • Stakeholder satisfaction with EA services
    • Increase in customer satisfaction
    • Rework minimized
    • Lower cost of integration
    • Risk reduction
    • Faster time to market
    • Better scalability, etc.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Organizations must create clear and smart KPIs (key performance indicators) across the board.

    From corporate strategy to enterprise architecture

    A model connecting 'Enterprise Architecture' with 'Corporate Strategy' through 'EA Services' and 'EA Strategy'.

    Info-Tech Insight

    In the absence of a corporate strategy, enterprise architecture is missing its North Star.

    However, enterprise architects can partner with the business strategists to build the needed vision.

    Traceability to and from business corporate business goals to EA contributions (sample)

    A model connecting 'Enterprise Architecture' with 'Corporate Goals' through 'EA Contributions'.

    Enterprise architecture journey

    The enterprise architecture journey, from left to right: 'Business Goals' and 'EA Maturity Assessment', 'EA Strategy', 'Industry-Specific Capability Model' and 'Customized to the Organization's Needs', 'EA Operating Model' and 'EA Governance', 'Business Architecture' and 'EA Tooling', 'Data Architecture' and 'Application Architecture', 'Infrastructure Architecture'.

    Agile architecture principles

    Agile architecture principles:
    • Fast learning cycle
    • Explore alternatives
    • Create environment for decentralized ideation and innovation

    According to the Scaled Agile Framework, three of the most applicable principles for the architectural professions refer to the following:

    1. "Fast learning cycle" refers to learning cycles that allow for quick reiterations as well as the opportunity to fail fast to learn fast.
    2. "Explore alternatives" refers to the exploration phase and also to the need to make tough decisions and balance competing demands.
    3. "Create environment for decentralized ideation and innovation" ensures that no one has a monopoly on innovation. Moreover, EA needs to invite ideas from various stakeholders (from the business to operations as well as implementers, etc.).

    Architecture roles in lean enterprises

    Typical architecture roles in modern/Agile lean enterprises

    • System Architect
    • Solution Architect
    • Enterprise Architect

    Depth vs. strategy focus

    Typical architect roles

    A graph with different architect roles mapped onto it. Axes are 'Low Strategic Impact' to 'High Strategic Impact' and 'Breadth' to 'Depth'. 'Enterprise Architect' has the highest strategic impact and most breadth. 'Technical/System Architect' has the lowest strategic impact and most depth. 'Solution Architect' sits in the middle of both axes.

    Architecture roles continued

    The three architect roles from above and their impacts on the list of 'Common Domains' to the right. 'Enterprise Architect's impact is 'Across Value Streams', 'Solution Architect's impact is 'Across Systems', 'Technical/System Architect's impact is 'Single System'. Adapted from Scaled Agile.

    Common Domains

    Business Architecture

    Information Architecture

    Application Architecture

    Technical Architecture

    Integration Architecture

    Security Architecture

    Others

    Info-Tech Insight

    All architects are boots on the ground and play in the solutioning space. What differs is their decisions’ impact (the enterprise architect’s decisions affects all domains and solutions).

    SAFe definitions of the Enterprise/Solution and System Architect roles can be found here.

    The role of the Enterprise Architect is detailed here.

    Collaboration models across the enterprise

    A collaboration model with 'Enterprise Architecture' at the top consisting of a 'Chief Enterprise Architect', 'Enterprise Architects', and 'EA Concerns across solutions': 'Architect A', 'Architect B', and 'Architect C'. Each lettered Architect is connected to their respective 'Solution Architect (A-C)' which runs their respective 'Delivery Team (A-C)' with 'Other Team Members'.(Adapted from Disciplined Agile)

    There are both formal and informal collaborations between enterprise architects and solution architects across the enterprise.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Enterprise architects should collaborate with solutions architects to create the best solutions at the enterprise level and to provide guidance across the board.

    Architect roles in SAFe

    According to Scale Agile Framework 5 for Lean Enterprises:

    • The system architect participates in the Essential SAFe
    • Solution architects and system architects participate in Large Solution
    • The enterprise architect participates in the Portfolio SAFe
    • Enterprise, solution, and system architects are all involved in Full SAFe

    Please check the SAFe Scaled Agile site for detailed information on the approach.

    Architect roles and their participation in Agile events (see likely events and a typical calendar)

    Info-Tech Insight

    A clear commitment for architects to achieve and support agility is needed. Architects should not be in an ivory tower; they should be hands on and engaged in all relevant Agile ceremonies, like the pre- and post-program increment (PI) planning, etc.

    Architect syncs are also required to ensure the needed collaboration.

    Architect participation in Agile ceremonies, according to SAFe:

    Architecture runway (at scale)

    Info-Tech Insight

    Architecting for scale, modularity, and extensibility is key for the architecture to adapt to changing conditions and evolve.

    Proactively address NFRs; architect for performance and security.

    Continuously refine the solution intent.

    For large solutions, longer foundational architectural runways are needed.

    Having an intentional continuous improvement/continuous development (CI/CD) pipeline to continuously release, test, and monitor is key to evolving large and complex systems.

    Parallel continuous exploration/integration/deployment

    A cycle titled DevOps containing three smaller cycles labelled 'Continuous Explorations', 'Continuous Integration', and 'Continuous Deployment'.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Architects need to help make some fundamental decisions, e.g. help define the environment that best supports continuous innovation or exploration and continuous integration, deployment, and delivery.

    Typical strategic enterprise architecture involvement

    Enterprise Architect —DRIVES–› Enterprise Architecture Strategy

    Enterprise Architecture Strategy
    • Application Strategy
    • Business Strategy
    • Data Strategy
    • Implementation Strategy
    • Infrastructure Strategy
    • Inter-domain Collaboration
    • Integration Strategy
    • Operations Strategy
    • Security Strategy
    • (Adapted from Scaled Agile)

    The EA statement relative to agility

    The enterprise architecture statement relative to agility specifies the architects’ responsibilities as well as the Agile protocols they will participate in. This statement will guide every architect’s participation in planning meetings, pre- and post-PI, various syncs, etc. Use simple and concise terminology; speak loudly and clearly.

    Strong EA statement relative to agility has the following characteristics:

    • Describes what different architect roles do to achieve the vision of the organization
    • In an agile way
    • Compelling
    • Easy to grasp
    • Sharply focused
    • Specific
    • Concise

    Sample EA statement relative to agility

    • Create strategies that provide guardrails for the organization, provide standards, reusable assets, accelerators, and other decisions at the enterprise level that support agility.
    • Participate in pre-PI and post-PI planning activities, architect syncs, etc.

    A clear statement can include additional details surrounding the enterprise architect’s role relative to agility

    Below is a sample of connecting keywords to form an enterprise architect role statement, relative to agility.

    Optimize, transform, and innovate by defining and implementing the [Company]’s target enterprise architecture in an agile way.

    Optimize – We collaborate with the business to analyze and optimize business capabilities and business processes to enable the agile and efficient attainment of [Company name] business objectives.

    Transform – We support IT-enabled business transformation programs by building and maintaining a shared vision of the future-state enterprise and consistently communicating it to stakeholders.

    Innovate – We identify and develop new and creative opportunities for IT to enable the business. We communicate the art of the possible to the business.

    Defining and implementing – We engage with project teams early and guide solution design and selection to ensure alignment to the target-state enterprise architecture and provide guidance and accelerators.

    Target enterprise structure in an agile way – We analyze business needs and priorities and assess the current state of the enterprise. We build and maintain the target enterprise architecture blueprints that define:

    • Business capabilities and processes (business architecture)
    • Data, application, and technology assets that enable business capabilities and processes (technology architecture)
    • Architecture principles
    • Standards and reusable assets
    • Continuous exploration, integration, and deployment

    Traditional vs. Agile approaches

    Traditional Enterprise Architecture Next-Generation Enterprise Architecture
    Scope: Technology focused Business transformation (scope includes both business and technology)
    Bottom up Top down
    Inside out Outside In
    Point to point; difficult to change Expandable, extensible, evolvable
    Control-based: Governance intensive; often over-centralized Guidance-based: Collaboration and partnership-driven based on accepted guardrails
    Big up-front planning Incremental/dynamic planning; frequent changes
    Functional siloes and isolated projects, programs, and portfolios Enterprise-driven outcome optimization (across value streams)

    Info-Tech Insight

    The role of the architecture in Lean (Agile) approaches is to set up the needed guardrails and ensure a safe environment where everyone can be effective and creative.

    Design an Enterprise Architecture Strategy

    Phase 2

    Create the EA Value Proposition

    Phase 1

    • 1.1 Explore a general EA strategy approach
    • 1.2 Introduce Agile EA architecture

    Phase 2

    • 2.1 Define the business and technology drivers
    • 2.2 Define your value proposition

    Phase 3

    • 3.1 Realize the importance of EA fundamentals
    • 3.2 Finalize the EA fundamentals

    Phase 4

    • 4.1 Select relevant EA services
    • 4.2 Finalize the set of services and secure approval

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Identify and prioritize EA stakeholders.
    • Create business and technology drivers from stakeholder information.
    • Identify business pains and technology drivers.
    • Define EA contributions to alleviate the pains.
    • Create promises of value to fully articulate the value proposition.

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • CIO
    • IT Leaders
    • Business Leaders

    Step 2.1

    Define the Business and Technology Drivers

    Activities
    • 2.1.1 Use a stakeholder power map to identify and prioritize EA stakeholders
    • 2.1.2 Conduct a PESTLE analysis
    • 2.1.3 Review strategic planning documents
    • 2.1.4 Conduct EA stakeholder interviews

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Learn the five-step process to create an EA value proposition.
    • Uncover business and technology needs from stakeholders.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • CIO
    • IT Leaders
    • Business Leaders

    Outcomes of this step

    An understanding of your organization’s EA needs.

    Create the Value Proposition

    Step 2.1 Step 2.2

    Value proposition is an important step in the creation of the EA strategy

    Creating an EA value proposition should be the first step to realizing a healthy EA function. The EA value proposition demonstrates to organizational stakeholders the importance of EA in helping to realize their needs.

    Five steps towards the successful articulation of EA value proposition:

    1. Identify and prioritize stakeholders. The EA function must know to whom to communicate the value proposition.
    2. Construct business and technology drivers. Drivers are derived from the needs of the business and IT. Needs come from the analysis of external factors, strategic documents, and interviewing stakeholders. Helping stakeholders and the organization realize their needs demonstrates the value of EA.
    3. Discover pains that prevent driver realization. There are always challenges that obstruct drivers of the organization. Find out what they are to get closer to showing the value of EA.
    4. Brainstorm EA contributions. Pains that obstruct drivers have now been identified. To demonstrate EA’s value, think about how EA can help to alleviate those pains. Create statements that show how EA’s contribution will be able to overcome the pain to show the value of EA.
    5. Derive promises of value. Complete the articulation of value for the EA value proposition by stating how realizing the business or technology will provide in terms of value for the organization. Speak with the stakeholders to discover the value that can be achieved.

    Info-Tech Insight

    EA can deliver many benefits to an organization. To increase the likelihood of success, each EA group needs to commit to delivering value to their organization based on the current operating environment and the desired direction of the enterprise. An EA value proposition will articulate the group’s promises of value to the enterprise.

    The foundation of an optimal EA value proposition is laid by defining the right stakeholders

    All stakeholders need to know how the EA function can help them. Provide the stakeholders with an understanding of the EA strategy’s impact on the business by involving them.

    A stakeholder map can be a powerful tool to help identify and prioritize stakeholders. A stakeholder map is a visual sketch of how various stakeholders interact with your organization, with each other, and with external audience segments.

    An example stakeholder map with the 'Key players' quadrant highlighted, it includes 'CEO', 'CIO', and the modified position of 'CFO' after being engaged.

    “Stakeholder management is critical to the success of every project in every organization I have ever worked with. By engaging the right people in the right way in your project, you can make a big difference to its success…and to your career.” (Rachel Thompson, MindTools)

    2.1.1 Use a stakeholder power map to identify and prioritize EA stakeholders

    2 hours

    Input: Expertise from the EA strategy creation team

    Output: An identified and prioritized set of stakeholders for the EA function to target

    Materials: Note-taking materials, Whiteboard or flip chart, markers

    Participants: EA strategy creation team

    1. A stakeholder power map helps to visualize the importance of various stakeholders and their concerns so you can prioritize your time according to the most powerful and most impacted stakeholders.
    2. Evaluate each stakeholder in terms of power, Involvement, impact, and support.
      • Power: How much influence does the stakeholder have? Enough to drive the project forward or into the ground?
      • Involvement: How interested is the stakeholder? How involved is the stakeholder in the project already?
      • Impact: To what degree will the stakeholder be impacted? Will this significantly change how they do their job?
      • Support: Is the stakeholder a supporter of the project? Neutral? A resistor?
    3. Map each stakeholder to an area on the Power Map Template.
    4. Ask yourself if the power map looks accurate. Is there someone who has no involvement in EA strategy development but should?
    5. Some stakeholders may have influence over others. For example, a COO who highly values the opinion of the Director of Operations would be influenced by that director. Draw an arrow from one stakeholder to another to signify this relationship.

    Download the Stakeholder Power Map Template for more detailed instructions on completing this activity.

    Each stakeholder will have a set of needs that will influence the final EA value proposition

    All stakeholders will have a set of needs they would like to address. Take those needs and translate them into business and technology drivers. Drivers help clearly articulate to stakeholders, and the EA function, the stakeholder needs to be addressed.

    Business Driver

    Business drivers are internal or external business conditions, changing business capabilities, and changing market trends that impact the way EA operates and provides value to the enterprise.

    Examples:

    Ensure corporate compliance with legislation pertaining to data and security (e.g. regulated oil fields).

    Enable the automation and digitization of internal processes and services to business stakeholders.

    Technology Driver

    Technology drivers are internal or external technology conditions or factors that are not within the control of the EA group that impact the way that the EA group operates and provides value to the enterprise.

    Examples:

    Establish standards and policies for enabling the organization to take advantage of cloud and mobile technologies.

    Reduce the frequency of shadow IT by lowering the propensity to make business–technology decisions in isolation.

    (Source: The Strategic CFO, 2013)

    Gather information from stakeholders to begin the process of distilling business and technology drivers

    Review information sources, then analyze them to derive business and technology drivers. Information sources are not targeted towards EA stakeholders. Analyze the information sources to create drivers that are relevant to EA stakeholders.

    Information Sources Drivers (Examples)

    PESTLE Analysis

    Strategy Documents

    Stakeholder Interviews

    SWOT Analysis

    —›

    Analysis

    —›

    Help the organization align technology investments with corporate strategy

    Ensure corporate compliance with legislation.

    Increase the organization’s speed to market.

    Business and Technology Needs

    By examining information sources, the EA team will come across a set of business and technology needs. Through analysis, these needs can be synthesized into drivers.

    The PESTLE analysis will help you uncover external factors impacting the organization

    PESTLE examines six perspectives for external factors that may impact business and technology needs. Below are prompting questions to facilitate a PESTLE analysis working session.

    Political
    • Will a change in government (at any level) affect your organization?
    • Do inter-government or trade relations affect you?
    • Are there shareholder needs or demands that must be considered?
    • How are your costs changing (moving off-shore, fluctuations in markets, etc.)?
    • Do currency fluctuations have an effect on your business?
    • Can you attract and pay for top-quality talent (e.g. desirable location, reasonable cost of living, changes to insurance requirements)?
    Economic
    Social
    • What are the demographics of your customers and/or employees?
    • What are the attitudes of your customers and/or staff (e.g. do they require social media, collaboration, transparency of costs)?
    • What is the general lifecycle of an employee (i.e. is there high turnover)?
    • Is there a market of qualified staff?
    • Is your business seasonal?
    • Do you require constant technology upgrades (e.g. faster network, new hardware)?
    • What is the appetite for innovation within your industry/business?
    • Are there demands for increasing data storage, quality, BI, etc.?
    • Are you looking to cloud technologies?
    • What is the stance on bring your own device?
    • Are you required to do a significant amount of development work in-house?
    Technological
    Legal
    • Are there changes to trade laws?
    • Are there changes to regulatory requirements (i.e. data storage policies, privacy policies)?
    • Are there union factors that must be considered?
    • Is there a push towards being environmentally friendly?
    • Does the weather have any effect on your business (hurricanes, flooding, etc.)?
    Environmental

    2.1.2 Conduct a PESTLE analysis

    2 hours

    Input: Expertise from EA strategy creation team

    Output: Identified set of business and technology needs from PESTLE

    Materials: Note-taking materials, Whiteboard or flip chart, markers

    Participants: EA strategy creation team

    1. Begin conducting the PESTLE analysis by breaking the participants into groups. Divide the six different perspectives amongst the groups.
    2. Ask each group to begin to derive business and technology needs from their assigned perspectives. Use some of the areas noted below along with the questions on the previous slide to derive business and technology needs.
      • Political: Examine taxes, environmental regulations, and zoning restrictions.
      • Economic: Examine interest rates, inflation rate, exchange rates, the financial and stock markets, and the job market.
      • Social: Examine gender, race, age, income, disabilities, educational attainment, employment status, and religion.
      • Technological: Examine servers, computers, networks, software, database technologies, wireless capabilities, and availability of Software as a Service.
      • Legal: Examine trade laws, labor laws, environmental laws, and privacy laws.
      • Environmental: Examine green initiatives, ethical issues, weather patterns, and pollution.
    3. Ask each group to take into account the following questions when deriving business and technology needs:
      • Will business components require any changes to address the factor?
      • Will information technology components changes be needed to address any factor?
    4. Have each team record its findings. Have each team present its list and have remaining teams give feedback and additional suggestions. Record any changes in this step.

    Download the PESTLE Analysis Template to assist with completing this activity.

    Strategic planning documents can provide information regarding the direction of the organization

    Some organizations (and business units) create an authoritative strategy document. These documents contain corporate aspirations and outline initiatives, reorganizations, and shifts in strategy. From these documents, a set of business and technology needs can be generated.

    Overt Statements

    • Corporate objectives and initiatives are often explicitly stated in these documents. Look for statements that begin with phrases such as “Our corporate objectives are…”
    • Remember that different organizations use different terminology; if you cannot find the word goal or objective then look for “pillar,” “imperative,” “theme,” etc.

    Turn these statements to business and technology needs by:

    Asking the following:
    • Is there a need from a business perspective to address these objectives, initiatives, and shifts in strategy?
    • Is there a need from a technology perspective to address these objectives, initiatives, and shifts in strategy?

    Covert Statements

    • Some corporate objectives and initiatives will be mentioned in passing and will require clarification. For example: “As we continue to penetrate new markets, we will be diversifying our manufacturing geography to simplify distribution.”

    2.1.3 Review strategic planning documents

    2 hours

    Input: Strategic documents in the organization

    Output: Identified set of business and technology needs from documents

    Materials: Note-taking materials, Whiteboard or flip chart, markers

    Participants: EA strategy creation team

    Begin the identification process of business and technology needs from strategic documents with the following steps:

    1. Work with the EA strategy creation team to identify the strategic documents within the organization. Look for documents with any of the following content:
      • Corporate strategy document
      • Business unit strategy documents
      • Annual general reports
    2. Gather the strategic documents into one place and call a meeting with the EA strategy creation team to identify the business and technology needs in those documents.
    3. Pick one document and look through its contents. Look for future-looking words such as:
      • We will be…
      • We are planning to…
      • We will need…
    4. Consider those portions of the document with future-looking words and ask the following:
      • Will business components require any changes to address these objectives?
      • Will information technology components changes be needed to address these objectives?
    5. Record the business and technology needs identified in step 4. As well, record any questions you may have regarding the document contents for stakeholders to validate later.
    6. Move to the next document once complete. Complete steps 3-5 for the remaining strategy documents.

    Stakeholder interviews will help you collect primary data and will shed light on stakeholder priorities and challenges

    In this interview process, you will be asking EA stakeholders questions that uncover their business and technology needs. You will also be able to ask follow-up questions to get a better understanding of abstract or complex concepts from the strategy document review and PESTLE analysis.

    EA Stakeholders:

    • Stakeholders may not think of their business and technology needs. But stakeholders will often explicitly state their objectives and initiatives.
    • Objectives often result in risks, opportunities, and annoyances:
      • Risks: Potential damage associated with pursuing an objective or initiative.
      • Opportunities: Potential gains that could be leveraged when capturing objectives and initiatives.
      • Annoyances: Roadblocks that could hinder the pursuit of objectives and initiatives.
    • Ask stakeholders questions on these areas to discern their business and technology needs.

    Risks + Opportunities + Annoyances –› Business and Technology Needs

    2.1.4 Conduct EA stakeholder interviews

    4-8 hours

    Input: Expertise from the EA stakeholders

    Output: Business and technology needs for EA stakeholders

    Materials: Note-taking materials, Whiteboard or flip chart, markers

    Participants: EA strategy creation team, Identified EA stakeholders

    1. Schedule an interview with each of the stakeholders that were identified as key stakeholders in the Stakeholder Power Map.
    2. Meet with the key EA stakeholders and start business and technology needs gathering. Schedule each identified key stakeholder for an interview.
    3. When a stakeholder arrives for their interview, ask the following questions and record the answers to help uncover needs. Be sure to record which stakeholder answered the question. Further, record any future stakeholders that agree.
      • What are the current strengths of your organization?
      • What are the current weaknesses of your organization?
      • What is the number 1 risk you need to prevent?
      • What is the number 1 opportunity you want to capitalize on?
      • What is the number 1 annoying pet peeve you want to remove?
      • How would you prioritize these risks, opportunities, and annoyances?
    4. Recorded answer example: “We can’t see what the other departments are doing; when we spend a lot of money to invest in something, we later find out the capability is already within the company.”
    5. After completing each interview, verify with each stakeholder that you have captured their business and technology needs. Continue the interview process until all identified key stakeholders have been interviewed.
    6. Capture all inputs into a SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) format.

    Step 2.2

    Define Your Value Proposition

    Activities
    • 2.2.1 Create a set of business and technology drivers from business and technology needs
    • 2.2.2 Identify the pains associated with the business and technology drivers
    • 2.2.3 Identify the EA contributions that can address the pains
    • 2.2.4 Create promises of value to shape the EA value proposition

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Use business and technology drivers to determine EA’s role in your organization.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • CIO
    • IT Leaders
    • Business Leaders

    Outcomes of this step

    A value proposition document that ties the value of the EA function to stakeholder needs.

    Create the EA Value Proposition

    Step 2.1 Step 2.2

    Synthesize the collected data into business and technology drivers

    Two triangles labelled 'Business needs' and 'Technology needs' point to a cloud labelled 'Analysis', which connects to the driver attributes on the right via a dotted line.

    There are several key attributes that a driver should have.

    Driver Key Attributes
    • A succinct statement.
    • Begins with “action words” to communicate a call to action (e.g. Support, Help, Enable).
    • Written in a language understood by all parties involved.
    • Communicates a need for improvement or prevention.

    “The greatest impact of enterprise architecture is the strategic impact. Put the mission and the needs of the organization first.” (Matthew Kern, Clear Government Solutions)

    2.2.1 Create a set of business and technology drivers from business and technology needs

    3 hours

    Input: Expertise from EA strategy creation team

    Output: A set of business and technology drivers

    Materials: Note-taking materials, Whiteboard or flip chart, markers

    Participants: EA strategy creation team, EA stakeholders

    Meet with the EA strategy creation team and follow the steps below to begin the process of synthesizing the business and technology needs into drivers.

    1. Lay out the documented business and technology needs your team gathered from PESTLE analysis, strategy document reviews, and stakeholder interviews.
    2. Assess the documented business and technology needs to see if there are common themes. Consolidate those similar business and technology needs by crafting one driver for them. For example:
      • PESTLE: Influx of competitors in the marketplace causing tighter margins.
      • Document review: Improve investment quality and their value to the organization.
      • Stakeholder interview: “We can’t see what the other departments are doing; when we spend a lot of money to invest in something, we later find out the capability is already within the company.”
      • Consolidated business driver example: Help the organization align investments with the corporate strategy and departmental priorities.
    3. As well, synthesize the business and technology needs that cannot be consolidated.
    4. Verify the completed list of drivers with stakeholders. This is to ensure you have fully captured their needs.

    Download the EA Value Proposition Template to record your findings in this activity.

    When addressing business and technology drivers, an organization can expect obstacles

    A pain is an obstacle that business stakeholders will face when attempting to address business and technology drivers. Identify the pains associated with each driver so that EA’s contributions can be linked to resolving obstacles to address business needs.

    Business and Technology Drivers

    Pains

    Created by assessing information sources. A sentence that states the nature of the pain and how the pain stops the organization from addressing the drivers.
    Examples:
    • Business driver: Help the organization align investments with the corporate strategy and departmental priorities.
    • Technology driver: Improve the organization’s technology responsiveness and increase speed to market.
    Examples:
    • Business driver pains: Lack of holistic view of business capabilities obstructs the organization from aligning investments with corporate strategy and departmental priorities.
    • Technology driver pains: Ineffective application development requiring delays decreases the speed to market.

    2.2.2 Identify the pains associated with the business and technology drivers

    2 hours

    Input: Expertise from EA strategy creation team and EA stakeholders

    Output: An associated pain that obstructs each identified driver

    Materials: Note-taking materials, Whiteboard or flip chart, markers

    Participants: EA strategy creation team, EA stakeholders

    Call a meeting with the EA strategy creation team and any available stakeholders to identify the pains that obstruct addressing the business and technology drivers.

    Take each driver and ask the questions below to the EA strategy creation team and to any EA stakeholders who are available. Record the answers to identify the pains when realizing the drivers.

    1. What are your challenges in performing the activity or process today?
    2. What other business activities/processes will be impacted/improved if we solve this?
    3. What compliance/regulatory/policy concerns do we need to consider in any solution?
    4. What are the steps in the process/activity?

    Take the recorded answers and follow the steps below to create the pain statements:

    1. Answers to the questions above can be long, unfocused, or spoken in a casual manner. To turn the answer into pains, refine the recorded answers into a succinct sentence that captures its meaning.
      • Recorded answer example: “I feel like there needs to be a holistic view of the organization. If we had a tool to see all the capabilities across the business, then we can figure out what investments should be prioritized.”
      • Example of pain statement: Lack of holistic view of business capabilities obstructs the organization from aligning investments with corporate strategy and departmental priorities.
    2. When the list of pains has been written out, verify with the stakeholders that you have fully captured their pains.

    Download the EA Value Proposition Template to record your findings in this activity.

    The identified pains can be alleviated by a set of EA contributions

    Set the foundations for the value proposition by brainstorming the EA contributions that can alleviate the pains.

    Business and technology drivers produce:

    Pains

    —›
    EA contributions produce:

    Value by alleviating pains

    Pains

    Obstructions to addressing business and technology drivers. Stakeholders will face these pains.

    Examples
    • Business driver pains: Lack of holistic view of business capabilities obstructs the organization from aligning investments with corporate strategy and departmental priorities.
    EA contributions

    Activities the EA function can perform to help alleviate the pains. Demonstrates the contributions the EA function can make to business value.

    Examples:
    • Business driver EA contributions: Business capability mapping shows the business capabilities of the organization and the technology that supports those capabilities in the current and target state. This provides a view for the set of investments that are needed by the organization, which can then be prioritized.

    Enterprise architecture functions can provide a diverse set of contributions to any organization – Sample

    EA contribution category EA contribution details
    Define business capabilities and processes As-is and target business capabilities and processes are documented and understood by both IT and the business.
    Design information flows and services Information flows and services effectively support business capabilities and processes.
    Analyze gaps and identify project opportunities Create informed project identification, scope definition, and project portfolio management.
    Optimize technology assets Greater homogeneity and interoperability between tangible and intangible technology assets.
    Create and maintain technology standards Decrease development, integration, and support efforts. Reduce complexity and improve interoperability.
    Rationalize technology assets Tangible and intangible technology assets are rationalized to adequately and efficiently support information flows and services.

    2.2.3 Identify the EA contributions that can address the pains

    2 hours

    Input: Expertise from EA strategy creation team

    Output: EA contributions that addresses the pains that were identified

    Materials: Note-taking materials, Whiteboard or flip chart, markers

    Participants: EA strategy creation team

    Gather with the EA strategy creation team, take each pain, then ask and record the answers to the questions below to identify the EA contributions that would solve the pains:

    1. What activities can the EA practice conduct to overcome the pain?
    2. What are the core EA models that can help accurately define the problem and assist in finding appropriate resolutions?
    3. What are the general EA benefits that can be associated with solving this pain?

    Answers to the questions above will generate a list of activities EA can do to help alleviate the pains. Use the following steps to complete this activity:

    1. Create a stronger tie between the EA contributions and pains by linking the EA contribution statement to the pain.
      • Example of pain statement: Lack of holistic view of business capabilities obstructs the organization from aligning investments with corporate strategy and departmental priorities.
      • Example of EA contributions statement: Business capability mapping shows the business capabilities of the organization and the technology that supports those capabilities in the current and target state. This provides a view for the set of investments that are needed by the organization, which can then be prioritized.
    2. Verify with the stakeholders that they understand the EA contributions have been written out and how those contributions address the pains.

    Download the EA Value Proposition Template to record your findings in this activity.

    EA promises of value articulate EA’s commitment to the organization

    • Business Goals and Technology Drivers
      A set of statements created from business and technology needs. Gathered from information sources, it communicates improvements needed.

      • Value Streams, Aspirations, Long-Term Goals
        Value streams, aspirations, long-term goals

        • EA Contributions
          EA contributions that will alleviate the obstructions. Removing the obstructions will allow EA to help satisfy business and technology needs.

          • Promise of Value
            A statement that depicts a concrete benefit the EA practice can provide for the organization in response to business and technology drivers.
            Communicate the statements in a language that stakeholders understand to complete the articulation of EA’s value proposition.

    2.2.4 Create promises of value to shape the EA value proposition

    2 hours

    Input: Expertise from EA strategy creation team and EA stakeholders

    Output: Promises of value for each business and technology driver

    Materials: Note-taking materials, Whiteboard or flip chart, markers

    Participants: EA strategy creation team, EA stakeholders

    Now that the EA contributions have been identified, identify the promises of value to articulate the value proposition.

    Take each driver, then ask and record the answers to the questions below to identify the promises of value when realizing the drivers:

    1. What does amazing look like if we solve this perfectly?
    2. What other business activities/processes will be impacted/improved if we solve this?
    3. What measures of success/change should we use to prove value of the effort (KPIs/ROI)?

    Take the recorded answers and follow the steps below to create the promises of value.

    1. Answers to the questions above can be long, unfocused, or spoken in a casual manner. To turn the answer into a promise of value, refine the recorded answer into a succinct sentence that captures its meaning.
      • Business driver example: Help the organization align investments with the corporate strategy and departmental priorities.
      • Recorded answer example: “If this would be solved perfectly, we would have a very easy time planning investments and investment planning hours can be spent doing other activities.”
      • Promises of value example: Increase the number of investments that have a direct tie to corporate strategy.
    2. When the promises of value have been written out, verify with the stakeholders that you have fully captured their ideas.

    Download the EA Value Proposition Template to record your findings in this activity.

    Design an Enterprise Architecture Strategy

    Phase 3

    Build the EA Fundamentals

    Phase 1

    • 1.1 Explore a general EA strategy approach
    • 1.2 Introduce Agile EA architecture

    Phase 2

    • 2.1 Define the business and technology drivers
    • 2.2 Define your value proposition

    Phase 3

    • 3.1 Realize the importance of EA fundamentals
    • 3.2 Finalize the EA fundamentals

    Phase 4

    • 4.1 Select relevant EA services
    • 4.2 Finalize the set of services and secure approval

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Create an EA vision statement and an EA mission statement.
    • Create EA goals, define EA objectives, and link them to EA goals.
    • Define the EA function scope dimensions.
    • Create a set of EA principles for your organization.
    • Discuss current methodology.

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • CIO
    • EA Team
    • IT Leaders
    • Business Leaders

    Step 3.1

    Realize the Importance of EA Fundamentals

    Activities
    • 3.1.1 Create the EA vision statement
    • 3.1.2 Create the EA mission statement
    • 3.1.3 Create EA goals
    • 3.1.4 Define EA objectives and link them to EA goals
    • 3.1.5 Record the details of each EA objective

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Define and document the fundamentals that guide the EA function.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • CIO
    • EA Team
    • IT Leaders
    • Business Leaders

    Outcomes of this step

    • Vision and mission statements for the EA function.
    • A set of EA goals and a set of objectives to track progression toward those goals.
    Build the EA Fundamentals
    Step 3.1 Step 3.2

    EA fundamentals guide the EA function

    EA fundamentals include a vision statement, a mission statement, goals and objectives, and principles. They are a set of documented statements that guide the EA function. The fundamentals guide the EA function in terms of its strategy and decision making.

    EA vision statement EA mission statement

    EA fundamentals

    EA goals and objectives EA principles

    Info-Tech Insight

    Treat the critical elements of the EA group the same way as you would a business. Create a directional foundation for EA and define the vision, mission, goals, principles, and scope necessary to deliver on the established value proposition.

    The EA vision statement articulates the aspirations of the EA function

    The enterprise architecture vision statement communicates a desired future state of the EA function. The statement is expressed in the present tense. It seeks to articulate the desired role of the EA function and how the EA function will be perceived.

    Strong EA vision statements have the following characteristics:

    • Describe a desired future
    • Focus on ends, not means
    • Communicate promise
    • Concise, no unnecessary words
    • Compelling
    • Achievable
    • Inspirational
    • Memorable

    Sample EA vision statements:

    • To be a trusted partner for both the business and IT, driving enterprise effectiveness, efficiency, and agility at [Company Name].
    • To be a trusted partner and advisor to both the business and IT, contributing to business-IT alignment and cost reduction at [Company Name].
    • To create distinctive value and accelerate [Company Name]’s transformation.

    The EA mission statement articulates the purpose of the EA function

    The enterprise architecture mission statement specifies the team’s purpose or “reason of being.” The mission should guide each day’s activities and decisions. The mission statements use simple and concise terminology, speak loudly and clearly, and generate enthusiasm for the organization.

    Strong EA mission statements have the following characteristics:

    • Articulates EA function purpose and reason for existence
    • Describes what the EA function does to achieve its vision
    • Defines who the customers of the EA function are
    • Compelling
    • Easy to grasp
    • Sharply focused
    • Inspirational
    • Memorable
    • Concise

    Sample EA mission statements:

    • Define target enterprise architecture for [Company Name], identify solution opportunities, inform IT investment management, and direct solution development, acquisition, and operation compliance.
    • Synergize with both the business and IT to define and help realize [Company Name]’s target enterprise architecture that enables the business strategy and optimizes IT assets, resources, and capabilities.

    The EA vision and mission statements become relevant to EA stakeholders when linked to the promises of value

    The process for constructing the enterprise architecture vision statement and enterprise architecture mission statement is articulated below.

    Promises of value Derive keywords Construct draft statements Reference test criteria Finalize statements
    Derive the a set of keywords from the promises of value to accurately capture their essence. Create the initial statement using the keywords. Check the initial statement against a set of test criteria to ensure their quality. Finalize the statement after referencing the initial statement against the test criteria.

    Derive keywords from promises of value to begin the vision and mission statement creation process

    Develop keywords by summarizing the promises of value that were derived from drivers into one word that will take on the essence of the promise. See examples below:

    Business and technology drivers Promises of value Keywords
    Help the organization align investments with the corporate strategy and departmental priorities. Increase the number of investments that have a direct tie to corporate strategy. Business
    Support the rapid growth and development of the company through fiscal planning, project planning, and technology sustainability. Ensure budgets and projects are delivered on time with the assistance of technology. IT-Enabled
    Reduce the duplication and work effort to build and deploy technology solutions across the entire organization. Aim to reduce the number of redundant applications in the organization to streamline processes and save costs. Catalyst
    Improve the organization’s technology responsiveness and increase speed to market. Reduce the number of days required in the SDLC for all core business support projects. Value delivery

    An inspirational vision statement is greater than the sum of the individual words

    Ensure the sentence is cohesive and captures additional value outside of the keywords. The statement as a whole should be greater than the sum of the parts. Expand upon the meaning of the words, if necessary, to communicate the value. Below is an example of a finished vision statement.

    Sample

    Be a catalyst for IT-enabled business value delivery.

    Catalyst – We will continuously interact with the business and IT to accelerate and improve results.

    IT-enabled – We will ensure the optimal use of technology in enabling business capabilities to achieve business objectives.

    Business – We will be perceived as a business-focused unit that understands [Company name]’s business priorities and required business capabilities.

    Value delivery – EA’s value will be recognized by both business and IT stakeholders. We will track and market EA’s contribution to business value organization-wide.

    A clear mission statement can include additional details surrounding the EA team’s desired and expected value

    Likewise, below is a sample of connecting keywords together to form an EA mission statement:

    Optimize, transform, and innovate by defining and implementing the [Company]’s target enterprise architecture.

    Optimize – We collaborate with the business to analyze and optimize business capabilities and business processes to enable the agile and efficient attainment of [Company name] business objectives.

    Transform – We support IT-enabled business transformation programs by building and maintaining a shared vision of the future-state enterprise and consistently communicating it to stakeholders.

    Innovate – We identify and develop new and creative opportunities for IT to enable the business. We communicate the art of the possible to the business.

    Defining and implementing – We engage with project teams early and guide solution design and selection to ensure alignment to the target-state enterprise architecture.

    Target enterprise structure – We analyze business needs and priorities and assess the current state of the enterprise. We build and maintain the target enterprise architecture blueprints that define:

    • Business capabilities and processes (business architecture)
    • Data, application, and technology assets that enable business capabilities and processes (technology architecture)
    • Architecture principles and standards

    3.1.1 Create the EA vision statement

    1 hour

    Input: Identified promises of value, Vision statement test criteria

    Output: EA function vision statement

    Materials: Note-taking materials, Whiteboard or flip chart, markers

    Participants: EA strategy creation team

    Begin the creation of the EA vision statement by following the steps below:

    1. Gather the EA strategy creation team and have the promises of value from the EA value proposition laid out.
    2. Select one promise of value and work with the team to identify one word that captures the essence of that promise of value.
    3. Continue to the next promise of value until all of the promises of value have a keyword identified.
    4. Have the identified set of keywords laid out and see if any of their meanings are similar and can be consolidated together. Consolidate similar meaning keywords.
    5. Create the initial draft of the EA vision statement by linking the keywords together.
    6. Check the initial draft of the vision statement against the test criteria below. Ask the team if the vision statement satisfies each of the test criteria.
      • Do you find this vision exciting?
      • Is the vision clear, compelling, and easy to grasp?
      • Does this vision somehow connect to the core purpose?
      • Will this vision be exciting to a broad base of people in the organization, not just those within the EA team?
    7. Make changes to the initial draft to satisfy the test criteria. Socialize the EA vision statement with EA stakeholders to make sure it captures their needs.

    3.1.2 Create the EA mission statement

    1 hour

    Input: Identified promises of value, Mission statement test criteria

    Output: EA function mission statement

    Materials: Note-taking materials, Whiteboard or flip chart, markers

    Participants: EA strategy creation team

    Begin the creation of the EA mission statement by following the steps below:

    1. Gather the EA strategy creation team and have the promises of value from the EA value proposition laid out.
    2. Select one promise of value and work with the team to identify one word that captures the essence of that promise of value.
    3. Continue to the next promise of value until all of the promises of value have a keyword identified.
    4. Have the identified set of keywords laid out, and see if any of their meanings are similar and can be consolidated together. Consolidate similar meaning keywords.
    5. Create the initial draft of the EA mission statement by linking the keywords together.
    6. Check the initial draft of the mission statement against the following test criteria below. Ask the team if the mission statement satisfies each of the test criteria.
      • Do you find this purpose personally inspiring?
      • Does the purpose help you to decide what activities to not pursue, to eliminate from consideration? Is this purpose authentic – something true to what the organization is all about – not merely words on paper that sound nice?
      • Would this purpose be greeted with enthusiasm rather than cynicism by a broad base of people in the organization?
    7. Make changes to the initial draft to satisfy the test criteria. Socialize the EA mission statement with EA stakeholders to make sure it captures their needs.

    EA goals demonstrate the achievement of success of the EA function

    Enterprise architecture goals define specific desired outcomes of an EA function. EA goals are important because they establish the milestones the EA function can strive toward to deliver their promises of value.

    Inform EA goals by examining:

    Promises of value

    —›
    EA goals produce:

    Targets and milestones

    Promises of value

    Produce EA strategic outcomes that can be classified into four categories. The four categories are:

    • Business performance
    • IT performance
    • Customer value
    • Risk management
    EA goals

    Support the strategic outcomes. EA goals can be strategic or operational:

    • EA strategic goals support the strategic outcomes.
    • EA operational goals help measure the architecture capability quality and supporting processes.

    3.1.3 Create EA goals

    2 hours

    Input: Identified promises of value

    Output: EA goals

    Materials: Note-taking materials, Whiteboard or flip chart, markers

    Participants: EA strategy creation team

    Begin the creation of EA goals by following the steps below:

    1. Gather the EA strategy creation team and the identified promises of value from Phase 2, Create the EA Value Proposition.
    2. Open the EA Goals and Objectives Template and examine the list of default EA goals already within the template.
    3. Take the identified promises of value and discuss with the team if any of the EA goals in the template relate to the promises of value. Record the related EA goal and promise of value. See example below:
      • Promises of value example: Increase the number of investments that have a direct tie to corporate strategy.
      • Related EA goal example: Alignment of IT and business strategy.
    4. Repeat step 3 until all identified promises of value have been examined in relation to the EA goals in the template.
    5. If there are promises of value that are not related to an EA goal in the template, create EA goals to relate to those promises of value. Keep in mind that EA goals need to support the strategic outcomes produced by the promises of value. Record the EA goals in the template and document the related promises of value.

    Download the EA Goals and Objectives Template to assist with completing this activity.

    Starting with COBIT, select the appropriate objectives to track EA goals – Sample

    Below are examples of EA goals and the objectives that track their performance:

    IT performance-oriented goals Objectives
    Alignment of IT and business strategy
    • Increase the percentage of enterprise strategic goals and requirements supported by IT strategic goals by X percent in the fiscal year.
    • Improve stakeholder satisfaction with planned function and services portfolio scope by X percent in the fiscal year.
    • Increase the percentage of IT value drivers mapped to business value drivers by X percent in the next fiscal year.
    Increase in IT agility
    • Improve business executive satisfaction with IT’s responsiveness to new requirements by X percent in the fiscal year.
    • Increase the number of critical business processes supported by up-to-date infrastructure and applications in the next three years.
    • Lower the average time to turn strategic IT objectives into agreed-upon and approved initiatives.
    Optimization of IT assets, resources, and capabilities
    • Increase the frequency of capability maturity and cost optimization assessments.
    • Improve the frequency of reporting for assessment result trends.
    • Raise the satisfaction levels of business and IT executives with IT-related costs and capabilities by X percent.

    3.1.4 Define EA objectives and link them to EA goals

    2 hours

    Input: Defined EA goals

    Output: EA objectives linked to EA goals

    Materials: Note-taking materials, Whiteboard or flip chart, markers

    Participants: EA strategy creation team

    Begin the process of defining EA objectives and linking them to EA goals using the following steps:

    1. Gather the EA strategy creation team and open the EA Goals and Objectives Template.
    2. Have the goals laid out, and refer to the objectives already in the EA Goals and Objectives Template. Examine if any of them will fit the goals your team has created.
    3. If some of the goals your team has created do not fit with the objectives in the template, begin the process of creating new objectives. Remember, EA objectives are SMART metrics that help track the progress toward the EA goals.
    4. Create an EA objective and check if it is SMART by asking some of the questions below:
      • Specific: Is the objective specific to the goal? Is the objective clear to anyone who has basic knowledge of the goal?
      • Measurable: Is it possible to figure out how far the team would be away from completing the objective?
      • Agreed Upon: Does everyone involved agree the objective is the correct way to measure progress?
      • Realistic: Can the objective be met within the availability of resources, knowledge, and time?
      • Time Based: Is there a time-bound component to the goal?
    5. Continue to create new objectives until each goal has an objective linked to it.

    Download the EA Goals and Objectives Template to assist with completing this activity.

    For each of the objectives, determine how they will be collected, reported, and implemented

    Add details to the enterprise architecture objectives previously defined to increase their clarity to stakeholders.

    EA objective detail category Description
    Unit of measure
    • The unit in which the objective will be presented.
    Calculation formula
    • The formula by which the objective will be calculated.
    Objective baseline, status, and target
    • Baseline: The state of the objective at the start of measurement.
    • Status: The current state of the measurement.
    • Target: The target state the measurement should reach.
    Data collection
    • Responsible: The individual responsible for collecting the data.
    • Source: Where the data originates.
    • Frequency: How often the data will be collected to calculate the objective.
    Reporting
    • Target Audience: The people the objective will be presented to.
    • Method: The method used to present the data collected on the objective (e.g. report, presentation).
    • Frequency: How often the data will be presented to the target audience.

    3.1.5 Record the details of each EA objective

    2 hours

    Input: Defined list of EA objectives

    Output: Increased detail into each defined EA objective

    Materials: Note-taking materials, Whiteboard or flip chart, markers

    Participants: EA strategy creation team

    Record the details of each EA objective. Use the following steps below to assist with recording the details:

    1. Gather the EA strategy creation team, and open the EA Goals and Objectives Template.
    2. Select one objective that has been identified and discuss the formula for calculating the objective and in what units the objective will be recorded. Record the information in the “Calculation formula” and “Unit of measure” columns in the template once they have been agreed upon.
    3. Using the same objective, move to the “Data Collection” portion of the template. Discuss and record the following: the source of the data that generates the objective, the frequency of reporting on the objective, and the person responsible for reporting the objective.
    4. Move to the “Reporting” portion of the template. Discuss and record the target audience for the objective and the reporting frequency and method to those audiences.
    5. Examine the “Objective baseline,” “Objective status,” and “Objective target” columns. Record any measurement you may currently have in the “Objective baseline” column. Record what you would like the objective measurement to be in the “Objective target” column. Note: Keep track of the progression towards the target in the “Objective status” column in the future.
    6. Select the next objective and complete steps 2–5 for that measure. Continue this process until you have recorded details for all objectives.

    Download the EA Goals and Objectives Template to assist with completing this activity.

    Step 3.2

    Finalize the EA Fundamentals

    Activities
    • 3.2.1 Define the organizational coverage dimension of the EA function scope
    • 3.2.2 Define the architectural domains and depth dimension
    • 3.2.3 Define the time horizon dimension
    • 3.2.4 Create a set of EA principles for your organization
    • 3.2.5 Add the rationale and implications to the principles
    • 3.2.6 Operationalize the EA principles
    • 3.2.7 Discuss the need for classical methodology and/or a combination including Agile practices

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Define the EA function scope dimensions.
    • Create a set of EA principles.
    • Discuss the organization’s current methodology, if any, and whether it works for the business.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • CIO
    • EA Team
    • IT Leaders
    • Business Leaders

    Outcomes of this step

    • Defined scope of the EA function.
    • A set of EA principles for your organization.
    • A decision on traditional vs. Agile methodology or a blend of both.

    Build the EA Fundamentals

    Step 3.1 Step 3.2

    A clear EA function scope defines the EA sandbox

    The EA function scope constrains the promises of value the EA function will deliver on by taking into account factors across four dimensions. The EA function scope ensures that the EA function is not stretched beyond its current/planned means and capabilities when delivering the promised value. The four dimensions are illustrated below:

    Organizational coverage
    Determine the focus of the enterprise architecture effort in terms of specific business units, functions, departments, capabilities, or geographical areas.
    Depth
    Determine the appropriate level of detail to be captured, based on the intended use of the enterprise architecture and the contingent decisions to be made.

    EA Scope

    Architectural Domains
    Determine the EA domains (business, data, application, infrastructure, security) that are appropriate to address stakeholder concerns and architecture requirements.
    Time horizon
    Determine the target-state architecture’s objective time period.

    The EA function scope is influenced by the EA value proposition and previously developed EA fundamentals

    Establish the EA function scope by using the EA value proposition and EA fundamentals that have been developed. After defining the EA function scope, refer back to these statements to ensure the EA function scope accurately reflects the EA value proposition and EA fundamentals.

    EA value proposition

    +

    EA vision statement
    EA mission statement
    EA goals and objectives

    —›
    Influences

    Organizational coverage

    Architectural domains

    Depth

    Time horizon

    —›
    Defines
    EA function scope

    EA scope – Organizational Coverage

    The organizational coverage dimension of EA scope determines the focus of enterprise architecture effort in the organization. Coverage can be determined by specific business units, functions, departments, capabilities, or geographic areas. Info-Tech has typically seen two types of coverage based on the size of the organization.

    Small and medium-size enterprise

    Indicators: Full-time employees dedicated to manage its data and IT infrastructure. Individuals are IT generalists and may have multiple roles.

    Recommended coverage: Typically, for small and medium-size businesses, the organizational coverage of architecture work is the entire enterprise. (Source: The Open Group, 2018)

    Large enterprise

    Indicators: Dedicated full-time IT staff with expertise to manage specific applications or parts of the IT infrastructure.

    Recommended coverage: For large enterprises, it is often necessary to develop a number of architectures focused on specific business segments and/or geographies. In this federated model, an overarching enterprise architecture should be established to ensure interoperability and conformance to overarching EA principles. (Source: DCIG, 2011)

    EA objectives track the progression towards the target set by EA goals

    Enterprise architecture objectives are specific metrics that help measure and monitor progress towards achieving an EA goal. Objectives are SMART.

    EA goals —› EA objectives
    • EA strategic goals:
      • Business performance
      • IT performance
      • Customer value
      • Risk management
    • EA operational goals
    • Specific
    • Measurable
    • Agreed upon
    • Realistic
    • Time bound
    (Source: Project Smart, 2014)

    Download the EA Goals and Objectives Template to see examples between the relationship of EA goals to objectives.

    Measure the EA strategy effectiveness by tracking the benefits it provides to the corporate business goals

    The success of the EA function is influenced by the following:

    • The delivery of EA-enabled business outcomes that are most important to the enterprise.
    • The alignment between the business and IT from a planning perspective.
    • Improvements in the corporate business goals due to EA contributions (standardization, rationalization, reuse, etc.).
    Corporate Business Goals Measurements
    • Reduction in operating costs
    • Decrease in regulatory compliance infractions
    • Increased revenue from existing channels
    • Increased revenue from new channels
    • Faster time to business value
    • Improved business agility
    • Reduction in enterprise risk exposure
    • Cost reductions based on application and platform rationalization
    • Standard-based solutions
    • Time reduction for integration
    • Service reused
    • Stakeholder satisfaction with EA services
    • Increase customer satisfaction
    • Rework minimized
    • Lower cost of integration
    • Risk reduction
    • Faster time to market
    • Better scalability, etc.

    3.2.1 Define the organizational coverage dimension of the EA function scope

    2 hours

    Input: EA value proposition, Previously defined EA fundamentals

    Output: Organizational coverage dimension of EA scope defined

    Materials: Note-taking materials, Whiteboard or flip chart, markers

    Participants: EA strategy creation team

    Define the organizational coverage of the EA function scope using the following steps below:

    1. Gather the EA strategy creation team. As well, gather the EA value proposition, the EA vision and mission statements, and the EA goals and objectives your team has already created.
    2. Ask the team to read each of the documents gathered in the previous step. This ensures the concepts are fresh in the team members’ minds when defining the EA function scope organizational coverage.
    3. Consider how much of the organization the EA function would need to cover. Refer to the gathered materials to assist with your decision. For example:
      • EA mission statement: Optimize, transform, and innovate by defining and implementing the [Company]’s target enterprise architecture.
      • Implications on organizational coverage: If the purpose of the EA function is to help optimize, transform, and innovate with target-state architecture mapping, then the scope should cover the entire organization. Only by mapping the entire organization’s architecture can the EA function assist with optimizing, transforming, and innovating.
    4. Work with the EA strategy creation team to examine all the gathered materials and document the implications on organization coverage as shown in step 3.
    5. Discuss with the team and select the organizational coverage level that best fits the documented implications for all the gathered materials. Refer back to the gathered materials and make any changes necessary to ensure they support the selected organizational coverage.

    EA scope – Architectural Domains

    A complete enterprise architecture should address all five architectural domains. The five architectural domains are business, data, application, infrastructure, and security.

    Enterprise Architecture
    —› Data Architecture
    Business Architecture —› Infrastructure Architecture
    Security Architecture
    —› Application Architecture

    “The realities of resource and time constraints often mean there is not enough time, funding, or resources to build a top-down, all-inclusive architecture encompassing all four architecture domains. Build architecture domains with a specific purpose in mind.” (The Open Group, 2018)

    Each architectural domain creates a different view of the organization

    Below are the definitions of different domains of enterprise architecture (Info-Tech perspective; others can be identified as well, e.g. Integration Architecture).

    Business Architecture

    Business architecture is a means of demonstrating the business value of subsequent architecture work to key stakeholders and the return on investment to those stakeholders from supporting and participating in the subsequent work. Business architecture defines the business strategy, governance, organization, and key business processes.

    Data Architecture

    Describes the structure of an organization’s logical and physical data assets and data management resources.

    Application Architecture

    Provides a blueprint for the individual applications to be deployed, their interactions, and their relationships to the core business processes of the organization.

    Infrastructure Architecture

    Represents the sum of hardware, software, and telecommunications-related IT capability associated with a particular enterprise. It is concerned with the synergistic operations and management of the devices in the organization.

    Security Architecture

    Provides an unified security design that addresses the necessities and potential risks involved in a certain scenario or environment. It also specifies when and where to apply security controls.
    (Sources: The Open Group, 2018; IT Architecture Journal, 2014; Technopedia, 2016)

    EA scope – Depth

    EA scope depth defines the architectural detail for each EA domain that the organization has selected to pursue. The level of depth is broken down into four levels. The level of depth the organization decides to pursue should be consistent across the domains.

    Contextual
    • Helps define the organization scope, and examines external and internal requirements and their effect on the organization. For example, enterprise governance.
    Conceptual
    • High-level representations of the organization or what the organization wants to be. For example, business strategy, IT strategy.
    Logical
    • Models that define how to implement the representation in the conceptual stage. For example, identifying the business gaps from the current state to the target state defined by the business strategy.
    Physical
    • The technology and physical tools used to implement the representation created in the logical stage. For example, business processes that need to be created to bridge the gaps identified and reach the target stage.
    (Source: Zachman International, 2011) Business Architecture Data Architecture Application Architecture Infrastructure Architecture Security Architecture

    Each architectural depth level contains a set of key artifacts

    The graphic below depicts examples of the key artifacts that each domain of architecture would produce at each depth level.

    Contextual Enterprise Governance
    Conceptual Business strategy Business objects Use-case models Technology landscaping Security policy
    Logical Business capabilities Data attribution Application integration Network/ hardware topology Security standards
    Physical Business process Database design Application design Configuration management Security configuration
    Business Architecture Data Architecture Application Architecture Infrastructure Architecture Security Architecture

    3.2.2 Define the architectural domains and depth dimension of the EA function scope

    2 hours

    Input: EA value proposition, Previously defined EA fundamentals

    Output: Architectural domain and depth dimensions of EA scope defined

    Materials: Note-taking materials, Whiteboard or flip chart, markers

    Participants: EA strategy creation team

    Define the EA function scope for your organization using the following steps below:

    1. Gather the EA strategy creation team. As well, gather the EA value proposition, the EA vision and mission statements, and the EA goals and objectives that your team has already created.
    2. Ask the team to read each of the documents gathered in the previous step. This ensures the concepts are fresh in the team members’ minds when defining the architectural domains and depth of the EA function scope.
    3. Consider the architectural domains and the depth those domains need to reach. Refer to the gathered materials to assist with your decision. For example:
      • Promise of value: Increase the number of IT investments with a direct tie to business strategy.
      • Implications on architectural domains: The EA function will need business architecture. Business architecture generates business capability mapping, which will anticipate what IT investments are needed for the future.
      • Implications on depth: Depth for business architecture needs to reach a logical level to encompass business capabilities.
    4. Work with the EA strategy creation team to examine all the gathered materials and document the implications on architectural domains and depth as shown in step 3.
    5. Discuss with the team and select the architectural domains and the depth for each domain that best fits the documented implication. Refer back to the gathered materials and make any changes necessary to ensure they support the selected architectural domains and depth.

    EA scope – Time Horizon

    The EA scope time horizon dictates how long to plan for the architecture.

    It is important that the EA team’s work has an appropriate planning horizon while avoiding two extremes:

    1. A planning horizon that is too short focuses on immediate operational goals and strategic quick wins, missing the “big picture,” and fails to support the achievement of strategic long-term enterprise goals.
    2. A planning horizon that is too long is at a higher risk of becoming irrelevant.

    Target the same strategic planning horizon as your business. Additionally, consider the following recommendations:

    Planning Horizon: 1 year 2-3 years 5 years
    Recommended under the following conditions:
    • Corporate strategy is not stable and frequently changes direction (typical for small and some mid-sized companies).
    • There will be a major update of the corporate strategy in one year.
    • The company will be acquired by or merged with another company in one year.
    • The business' strategic plan spans the next two to three years, and corporate strategy is moderately stable within this time frame (typical for mid-sized and some large companies).
    • The business' strategic plan spans the next five years and corporate strategy is very stable (typical for large companies).

    3.2.3 Define the time horizon dimension of the EA function scope

    2 hours

    Input: EA value proposition, Previously defined EA fundamentals

    Output: Time horizon dimension of EA scope defined

    Materials: Note-taking materials, Whiteboard or flip chart, markers

    Participants: EA strategy creation team

    Define the EA function scope for your organization using the following steps below:

    1. Gather the EA strategy creation team. As well, gather the EA value proposition, the EA vision and mission statements, and the EA goals and objectives your team has already created.
    2. Ask the team to read each of the documents gathered in the previous step. This ensures the concepts are fresh in the team members’ minds when crafting the EA function scope.
    3. Consider the time horizons of the EA function scope. Refer to the gathered materials to assist with your decision. For example:
      • EA Objective: Increase the percentage of enterprise strategic goals and requirements supported by IT strategic goals by 30% in the next 3 years.
      • Implications on time horizon: Because it will take 3 years to measure the success of these EA objectives, the time horizon may need to be 3 years.
    4. Work with the EA strategy creation team to examine all the gathered materials and document the implications on time horizon as shown in step 3.
    5. Discuss with the team and select the time horizon that best fits the documented implication. Refer back to the gathered materials and make any changes necessary to ensure they support the selected architectural time horizon.

    EA principles capture the EA value proposition essence and provide guidance for the decisions that impact architecture

    EA principles are shared, long-lasting beliefs that guide the use of IT in constructing, transforming, and operating the enterprise by informing and restricting target-state enterprise architecture design, IT investment portfolio management, solution development, and procurement decisions.

    EA value proposition Influences
    —›
    EA Principles Guide and inform
    —›
    Decisions on the Use of IT Direct and control
    ‹—
    Specific Domain Policies
    ‹———————

    What decisions should be made?
    ————— ————— —————
    How should decisions be made?
    ————— ————— —————————›
    Who has the accountability and authority to make decisions?

    EA principles must be carefully constructed to make sure they are adhered to and relevant

    Info-Tech has identified a set of characteristics that EA principles should possess. Having these characteristics ensures the EA principles are relevant and followed in the organization.

    Approach focused EA principles are focused on the approach, i.e. how the enterprise is built, transformed, and operated, as apposed to what needs to be built, which is defined by both functional and non-functional requirements.
    Business relevant Create EA principles specific to the organization. Tie EA principles to the organization’s priorities and strategic aspirations.
    Long lasting Build EA principles that will withstand the test of time.
    Prescriptive Inform and direct decision making with EA principles that are actionable. Avoid truisms, general statements, and observations.
    Verifiable If compliance can’t be verified, the principle is less likely to be followed.
    Easily digestible EA principles must be clearly understood by everyone in IT and by business stakeholders. EA principles aren’t a secret manuscript of the EA team. EA principles should be succinct; wordy principles are hard to understand and remember.
    Followed Successful EA principles represent a collection of beliefs shared among enterprise stakeholders. EA principles must be continuously “preached” to all stakeholders to achieve and maintain buy-in.

    In organizations where formal policy enforcement works well, EA principles should be enforced through appropriate governance processes.

    Review ten universal EA principles to determine if your organization wishes to adopt them

    1. Enterprise value focus We aim to provide maximum long-term benefits to the enterprise as a whole while optimizing total costs of ownership and risks.
    2. Fit for purpose We maintain capability levels and create solutions that are fit for purpose without over-engineering them.
    3. Simplicity We choose the simplest solutions and aim to reduce operational complexity of the enterprise.
    4. Reuse › buy › build We maximize reuse of existing assets. If we can’t reuse, we procure externally. As a last resort, we build custom solutions.
    5. Managed data We handle data creation, modification, and use enterprise-wide in compliance with our data governance policy.
    6. Controlled technical diversity We control the variety of technology platforms we use.
    7. Managed security We manage security enterprise-wide in compliance with our security governance policy.
    8. Compliance to laws and regulations We operate in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations.
    9. Innovation We seek innovative ways to use technology for business advantage.
    10. Customer centricity We deliver best experiences to our customers with our services and products.

    3.2.4 Create a set of EA principles for your organization

    2 hours

    Input: Info-Tech’s ten universal EA principles, Identified promises of value

    Output: A defined set of EA principles for your organization

    Materials: Note-taking materials, Whiteboard or flip chart, markers

    Participants: EA strategy creation team

    Create a set of EA principles for your organization using the steps below:

    1. Gather the EA strategy creation team, download the EA Principles Template – EA Strategy, and have the identified promises of value opened.
    2. Select one universal principle and relate it to the promises of value by discussing with the EA strategy creation team. If there is a relation, record “Yes” in the template on the slide “Select the applicability of 10 universally accepted EA principles.” See example below:
      • Universal principle: Enterprise value focus – We aim to provide maximum long-term benefits to the enterprise as a whole while optimizing total costs of ownership and risks.
      • Related promise of value example: Increase the number of investments that have a direct tie with corporate strategy.
    3. Continue the process in step 2 until all ten universal EA principles have been examined. If there is a universal principle that is unrelated to a promise of value, discuss with the team whether the principle still needs to be included. If the principle is not included, record “No” in the template on the slide “Select the applicability of 10 universally accepted EA principles.”
    4. If there are any promises of value that are not captured by the universally accepted EA principles, the team may choose to create new principles. Create the new principles in the format below and record them in the template.
      • Name: The name of the principle, in a few words.
      • Statement: A sentence that expands on the “Name” section and explains what the principle achieves.

    Download the EA Principles Template – EA Strategy to document this step.

    Organizational stakeholders are more likely to follow EA principles when a rationale and an implication are provided

    After defining the set of EA principles, ensure they are all expanded upon with a rationale and implications. The rationale and implications ensure principles are more likely to be followed because they communicate why the principles are important and how they are to be used.

    Name
    • The name of the EA principle, in a few words.
    Statement
    • A sentence that expands on the “Name” section and explains what the principle achieves.
    Rationale
    • Describes the business benefits and reasoning for establishing the principle.
    • Explicitly links the principle to business/IT vision, mission, priorities, goals, or strategic aspirations (strategic themes).
    Implications
    • Describe when and how the principle is to be applied.
    • Communicate this section with “must” sentences.
    • Refer to domain-specific policies that provide detailed, domain-specific direction on how to apply the principle.

    3.2.5 Add the rationale and implications to the principles that have been created

    2 hours

    Input: Identified set of EA principles

    Output: EA principles that have rationale and implications

    Materials: Note-taking materials, Whiteboard or flip chart, markers

    Participants: EA strategy creation team

    Add the rationale and implication of each EA principle that your organization has selected using the following steps:

    1. Gather the EA strategy creation team and open the EA Principles Template – EA Strategy.
    2. Examine the EA Principles Template – EA Strategy. Look for the detailed descriptions of all the applicable EA universal principles, and discuss with the team whether the pre-populated rationale and implications need to be changed.
    3. Make sure all the rationale and implication sections of the applicable universal EA principles have been examined. Record the changes on the slide devoted to each principle in the template.
    4. Examine any new principles created outside of the universal EA principles. Create the rationale and implication sections for each of those principles. Use the slide “Review the rationale and implications for the applicable universal principles” in the EA Principles Template – EA Strategy to assist with this step.

    Download the EA Principles Template – EA Strategy to document this step.

    3.2.6 Operationalize the EA principles to ensure they are used when decisions are being made

    1-2 hours

    Input: Defined set of EA principles

    Output: EA principles are successfully operationalized

    Materials: Note-taking materials, Whiteboard or flip chart, markers

    Participants: EA strategy creation team

    Begin to operationalize the EA principles by reviewing the proposed principles with business and technology leadership to secure their approval.

    1. Publish the list of principles, their rationale, and their implications.
    2. Include the principles in any existing policies that guide decision making for the use of technology within the business.
    3. Provide existing governance bodies with the authority to enforce adherence to principles, and communicate the waiver process.
    4. Ensure that project-level teams are aware of the principles and have at least one champion guiding the decisions of the team.

    Review a use case for the utilization of EA principles – Sample

    After operationalizing the EA principles for your organization, the organization can now use those principles to guide and inform its IT investment decisions. Below is an example of a scenario where EA principles were used to guide and inform an IT investment decision.

    Organization wants to provision an application but it needs to decide how to do so, and it considers the relevant EA principles:

    • Reuse › buy › build
    • Managed security
    • Innovation

    The organization has decided to go with a specialized vendor, even though it normally prefers to reuse existing components. The vendor has experience in this domain, understands the data security implications, and can help the organization mitigate risk. Lastly, the vendor is known for providing new solutions on a regular basis and is a market leader, making it more likely to provide the organization with innovative solutions.

    An oil and gas company created EA fundamentals to guide the EA function

    CASE STUDY

    Industry: Oil & Gas
    Source: Info-Tech

    Challenge

    As an enterprise architecture function starting from ground zero, the organization did not have the EA fundamentals in place to guide the EA function. Further, the organization also did not possess an EA function scope to define the boundaries of the EA function.

    Due to the lack of EA scope, the EA function did not know which part of the organization to provide contributions toward. A lack of EA fundamentals caused confusion regarding the future direction of the EA function.

    Solution

    Info-Tech worked with the EA team to define the different components of the EA fundamentals. This included EA vision and mission statements, EA goals and objectives, and EA principles.

    Additionally, Info-Tech worked with the EA team to define the EA function scope.

    These EA strategy components were created by examining the needs of the business. The components were aligned with the identified needs of the EA stakeholders.

    Results

    The defined EA function scope helped set out the responsibilities of the enterprise architecture function to the organization.

    The EA vision and mission statements and EA goals and objectives were used to guide the direction of the EA function. These fundamentals helped the EA function improve its maturity and deliver on its promises.

    The EA principles were used in IT review boards to guide the decisions on IT investments in the organization.

    3.2.7 Discuss the need for a classical methodology and/or a combination including Agility practices

    1 hour

    Input: Existing methodologies

    Output: Decisions about need of agility, ceremonies, and protocols to be used

    Materials: Note-taking materials, Whiteboard or flip chart, markers

    Participants: EA strategy creation team

    Add the rationale and implication of adopting an Agile methodology and/or a combination with a traditional methodology.

    1. Is there an EA methodology adopted by the organization? Is there a classical one, or is it purely Agile?
    2. What would need to happen to address the business goals of the organization (e.g. is there a need to be more agile?)? Do you need to have more decisions centralized (e.g. to adopt certain standards, security controls)?
    3. Where on the decentralization continuum does your organization need to be?
    4. What role would Enterprise Architects have (would they need to be part of existing ceremonies? Would they need to blend traditional and agile processes?)?
    5. If a customized methodology is required, identify this as an item to be included as part of the EA roadmap (can be run as a Agile Enterprise Operating Model workshop).

    Design an Enterprise Architecture Strategy

    Phase 4

    Design the EA Services

    Phase 1

    • 1.1 Explore a general EA strategy approach
    • 1.2 Introduce Agile EA architecture

    Phase 2

    • 2.1 Define the business and technology drivers
    • 2.2 Define your value proposition

    Phase 3

    • 3.1 Realize the importance of EA fundamentals
    • 3.2 Finalize the EA fundamentals

    Phase 4

    • 4.1 Select relevant EA services
    • 4.2 Finalize the set of services and secure approval

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Select relevant EA services
    • Finalize the set of services and secure approval

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • CIO
    • EA Team
    • IT Leaders
    • Business Leaders

    Step 4.1

    Select Relevant EA Services

    Activities
    • 4.1.1 Select the EA services relevant to your organization
    • 4.1.2 Identify if your organization needs additional services outside of the recommended list
    • 4.1.3 Complete all of the service catalog fields for each service to show the organization how each can be consumed

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Communicate a definition of EA services.
    • Link services to the previously identified EA contributions.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • CIO
    • EA Team
    • IT Leaders
    • Business Leaders

    Outcomes of this step

    • A defined set of services the EA function will provide.
    • An EA service catalog that demonstrates to the organization how each provided service can be accessed and consumed.

    Design the EA Services

    Step 3.1 Step 3.2

    The definition of EA services will allow the group to communicate how they can add value to EA stakeholders

    Enterprise architecture services are a set of activities the enterprise architecture function provides for the organization. EA services are important because the services themselves provide a set of benefits for the organization.

    Enterprise Architecture Services

    • A means of delivering value to the business by facilitating outcomes service consumers want to achieve.
    • EA services are defined from the business perspective using business language.
    • EA services are designed to enable required business activities.

    Viewing the EA function from a service perspective resolves the following pains:

    • Business users don’t know how EA can assist them.
    • Business users don’t know how to request access to a service with multiple sources of information available.
    • EA has no way of managing expectations for their users, which tend to inflate.
    • EA does not have a holistic view of all the services they need to provide.

    Link EA services to the previously identified EA contributions

    Previously identified EA contributions can be linked to EA services, which helps the EA function identify a set of EA services that are important to business stakeholders. Further, linking the EA contributions to EA services can define for the EA function the services they need to provide.

    Demonstrate EA service value by linking them to EA contributions

    1. EA stakeholders generate drivers
    2. Drivers have pains that obstruct them
    3. Pains are alleviated by EA contributions
    4. EA contributions help define the EA services needed

      • EA Contributions
        Example EA contribution: Business capability mapping shows the business capabilities of the organization and the technology that supports those capabilities in the current and target state. This provides a view for the set of investments that are needed by the organization, which can then be prioritized.

        • EA Services
          Example EA service: Target-state business capability mapping

    4.1.1 Select the EA services relevant to your organization

    2 hours

    Input: Previously identified EA contributions from the EA value proposition

    Output: A set of EA services selected for the organization from Info-Tech’s defined set of EA services

    Materials: Note-taking materials, Whiteboard or flip chart, markers

    Participants: EA strategy creation team

    Begin the selection of EA services relevant to your organization by following the steps below:

    1. Gather the EA strategy creation team, and the list of identified EA contributions that the team formulated during Phase 2.
    2. Open the EA Service Planning Tool, select one sub-service, and read its definition.
    3. Based on the definition of the sub-service, refer back to the identified list of EA contributions and check if there is an identified EA contribution that matches the service.
      • If the EA service definitions matches one of the identified EA contributions, then that EA service is relevant to the organization. If there is no match, then the EA service may not be relevant to the organization.
    4. Highlight the sub-service if it is relevant. Add a checkmark beside the EA contribution if it is addressed by a sub-service.
    5. Select the next sub-service and repeat steps 2-4. Continue down the list of sub-services in the EA Service Planning Tool until all sub-services have been examined.

    Download the EA Service Planning Tool to assist with this activity.

    4.1.2 Identify if your organization needs additional services outside of the recommended list

    2 hours

    Input: Expertise from the EA strategy creation team, Previously defined EA contributions

    Output: A defined set of EA services outside the list Info-Tech has recommended

    Materials: Note-taking materials, Whiteboard or flip chart, markers

    Participants: EA strategy creation team

    Identify if services outside of the recommended list in the EA Service Planning Tool are relevant to your organization by using the steps below:

    1. Gather the EA strategy creation team and the list of EA contributions with checkmarks for contributions addressed by EA services.
    2. Take the list of unaddressed EA contributions and select one EA contribution in the list. Assess whether an EA service is required to address the EA contribution. Ask the group the following:
      • Can the EA practice provide the service now?
      • Does providing this EA service line up with the previously defined EA function scope and EA fundamentals?
    3. Decide if a service needs to be provided for that contribution. If yes, give the service a name and a definition.
    4. Then, decide if the service fits into one of the service categories in the EA Service Planning Tool. If there is no fit, create another service category. Define the new service category as well.
    5. Continue to the next unaddressed EA contribution and repeat steps 2-4. Repeat this process until all unaddressed EA contributions have been assessed.

    Download the EA Service Planning Tool to assist with this activity.

    Create the EA service catalog to demonstrate to the organization how each service can be accessed and used

    The EA service catalog is an important communicator to the business. It shifts the technology-oriented view of EA to services that show direct benefit to the business. It is a tool that communicates and provides clarity to the business about the EA services that are available and how those services can assist them.

    Define the services to show value Define the service catalog to show how to use those services
    Already defined
    • EA service categories
    • The services needed by the EA stakeholders in each EA service category
    Need to define
    • Should EA deliver this service?
    • Service triggers
    • Service provider
    • Service requestor

    Info-Tech Insight

    The EA group must provide the organization with a list of services it will provide to demonstrate value. This will help the team manage expectations and the workload while giving organizational stakeholders a clear understanding of how to engage EA and what lies outside of EA’s involvement.

    4.1.3 Complete all the service catalog fields for each service to show the organization how each can be consumed

    4 hours

    Input: Expertise from the EA strategy creation team

    Output: Service details for each EA service in your organization

    Materials: Note-taking materials, Whiteboard or flip chart, markers

    Participants: EA strategy creation team

    Complete the details for each relevant EA service in the EA Service Planning Tool by using the following steps:

    1. Gather the EA strategy creation team, and open the EA Service Planning Tool.
    2. Select one of the services you have defined as relevant and begin the process of defining the service. Define the following fields:
      • Should EA deliver this service? Should the EA team provide this service? (Yes/No)
      • Service trigger: What trigger will signal the need for the service?
      • Service provider: Who in the EA team will provide the service?
      • Service requestor: Who outside of the EA team has requested this service?
    3. Have the EA strategy creation team discuss and define each of the fields for the service above. Record the decisions in the corresponding columns of the EA Service Planning Tool.
    4. Select the next required EA service, and repeat steps 2 and 3. Repeat the process until all required EA services have their details defined.

    Download the EA Service Planning Tool to assist with this activity.

    Step 4.2

    Finalize the Set of Services and Secure Approval

    Activities
    • 4.2.1 Secure approval for your organization’s EA strategy
    • 4.2.2 Map the EA contributions to business goals
    • 4.2.3 Quantify the EA effectiveness
    • 4.2.4 Determine the role of the architect in the Agile ceremonies of the organization

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Present the EA strategy to stakeholders.
    • Determine service details for each EA service in your organization.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • CIO
    • EA Team
    • IT Leaders
    • Business Leaders

    Outcomes of this step

    • Secured approval for your organization’s EA strategy.
    • Measure effectiveness of EA contributions.

    Design the EA Services

    Step 4.1 Step 4.2

    Present the EA strategy to stakeholders to secure approval of the finalized EA strategy

    For the EA strategy to be successfully executed, it must be approved by the EA stakeholders. Securing their approval will increase the likelihood of success in the execution of the EA operating model.

    Outputs that make up the EA strategy —› Present outputs to EA strategy stakeholders
    • Business and technology drivers
    • EA function value proposition

    • EA vision statement
    • EA mission statement
    • EA goals and objectives
    • EA scope
    • EA principles

    • EA function services
    • Identified and prioritized EA stakeholders.








    • The checkmark symbol represents the outputs this blueprint assists with creating.

    4.2.1 Secure approval of your organization’s EA strategy

    1 hour

    Input: Completed EA Function Strategy Template, Expertise from EA strategy creation team

    Output: Approval of the EA strategy

    Materials: Note-taking materials, Whiteboard or flip chart, markers

    Participants: EA strategy creation team, Key EA stakeholders

    Use the following steps to assist with securing approval for your organization’s EA strategy:

    1. Call a meeting between the EA strategy creation team and the identified key EA stakeholders. Key stakeholders were defined in activity 2.1.1.
    2. Open the completed EA Function Strategy Template. Use it to help you discuss the merits of the EA strategy with the key stakeholders.
    3. Discuss with the stakeholders any concerns and modifications they wish to make to the strategy. If detailed questions are asked, refer to the other templates created as a part of this blueprint. Record those concerns and address them at a later time.
    4. After presenting the EA strategy, ask the stakeholders for approval. If stakeholders do not approve, refer back to the concerns documented in step 3 and inquire if addressing the concerns will result in approval.
    5. If applicable, address stakeholder concerns with the EA strategy.
    6. Once EA strategy has been approved, publish the EA strategy to ensure there is a mutual understanding of what the EA function will provide to the organization. Move on to Info-Tech’s Define an EA Operating Model blueprint to begin executing upon the EA strategy.

    Use the EA Function Strategy Template to assist with this activity.

    4.2.2 Map the EA contributions to the business goals

    3 hours

    Input: Expertise from EA strategy creation team

    Output: Service details for each EA service in your organization

    Materials: Note-taking materials, Whiteboard or flip chart, markers

    Participants: EA strategy creation team

    Map EA contributions/services to the goals of the organization.

    1. Start from the business goals of the organization.
    2. Determine Business and IT drivers.
    3. Identify EA contributions that help achieve the business goals.

    Download the EA Service Planning Tool to assist with this activity.

    Trace EA drivers to business goals (sample)

    A model connecting 'Enterprise Architecture' with 'Corporate Goals' through 'EA Contributions'.

    4.2.3 Quantify the EA effectiveness

    1 hour

    Input: Expertise from EA strategy creation team

    Output: Defined KPIs (SMART)

    Materials: Note-taking materials, Whiteboard or flip chart, markers

    Participants: EA strategy creation team

    Use SMART key performance indicators (KPIs) to measure EA contributions vis-à-vis business goals.

    Measure the EA strategy effectiveness by tracking the benefits it provides to the corporate business goals

    The success of the EA function spans across three main dimensions:

    • The delivery of EA-enabled business outcomes that are most important to the enterprise.
    • The alignment between the business and IT from a planning perspective.
    • Improvements in the corporate business goals due to EA contributions (standardization, rationalization, reuse, etc.).
    Corporate Business GoalsEA ContributionsMeasurements
    • Reduction in operating costs
    • Decrease in regulatory compliance infractions
    • Increased revenue from existing channels
    • Increased revenue from new channels
    • Faster time to business value
    • Improved business agility
    • Reduction in enterprise risk exposure
    • Alignment of IT investments to business strategy
    • Achievement of business results directly linked to IT involvement
    • Application and platform rationalization
    • Standards in place
    • Flexible architecture
    • Better integration
    • Higher organizational satisfaction with technology-enabled services and solutions
    • Cost reductions based on application and platform rationalization
    • Standard based solutions
    • Time reduction for integration
    • Service reused
    • Stakeholder satisfaction with EA services
    • Increase customer satisfaction
    • Rework minimized
    • Lower cost of integration
    • Risk reduction
    • Faster time to market
    • Better scalability, etc.

    The oil and gas company began the EA strategy creation by crafting an EA value proposition

    CASE STUDY

    Industry: Oil & Gas
    Source: Info-Tech

    Challenge

    The oil and gas corporation faced a great challenge in communicating the role of enterprise architecture to the organization. Although it has the mandate from the CIO to create the EA function, there was no function in existence. Thus, few people in the organization understood EA.

    Because of this lack of understanding, the EA function was often undermined. The EA function was seen as an order taker that provided some services to the organization.

    Solution

    First, Info-Tech worked with the enterprise architecture team to define the EA stakeholders in the organization.

    Second, Info-Tech interviewed those stakeholders to identify their needs. The needs were analyzed and pains that would obstruct addressing those needs were identified.

    Lastly, Info-Tech worked with the team to identify common EA contributions that would solve those pains.

    Results

    Through this process, Info-Tech helped the team at the oil and gas company create a document that could communicate the value of EA. Specifically, the document could articulate the issues obstructing each stakeholder from achieving their needs and how enterprise architecture could solve them.

    With this value proposition, EA was able to demonstrate value to important stakeholders and set itself up for success in its future endeavors.

    The oil and gas company defined EA services to provide and communicate value to the organization

    CASE STUDY

    Industry: Oil & Gas
    Source: Info-Tech

    Challenge

    As a brand new enterprise architecture function, the EA function at the oil and gas corporation did not have a set of defined EA services. Because of this lack of EA services, the organization did not know what contributions EA could provide.

    Further, without the definition of EA services, the EA function did not set out explicit expectations to the business. This caused expectations from the business to be different from those of the EA function, resulting in friction.

    Solution

    Info-Tech worked with the EA function at the oil and gas corporation to define a set of EA services the function could provide.

    The Info-Tech team, along with the organization, assessed the business and technology needs of the stakeholder. Those needs acted as the basis for the EA function to create their initial services.

    Additionally, Info-Tech worked with the team to define the service details (e.g. service benefits, service requestor, service provider) to communicate how to provide services to the business.

    Results

    The defined EA services led the EA function to communicate what it could provide for the business. As well, the defined services clarified the level of expectation for the business.

    The EA team was able to successfully service the business on future projects, adding value through their expertise and knowledge of the organization’s systems. Because of the demonstrated value, EA has been given greater responsibility throughout the organization.

    4.2.4 Determine the role of the architect in the Agile ceremonies of the organization

    1 hour

    Input: Expertise from EA strategy creation team

    Output: Participation in Agile Pre- and Post-PI, Architect Syncs, etc.

    Materials: Note-taking materials, Whiteboard or flip chart, markers

    Participants: EA strategy creation team

    Document the involvement of the enterprise architect in your organization’s Agile ceremonies.

    1. Document the Agile ceremonial used in the organization (based on SAFe or other Agile approaches).
    2. Determine ceremonies the System Architect will participate in.
    3. Determine ceremonies the Solution Architect will participate in
    4. Determine ceremonies the Enterprise Architect will participate in.
    5. Determine Architect Syncs, etc.

    Note: Roles and responsibilities can be further defined as part of the Agile Enterprise Operating Model.

    The EA role relative to agility

    The enterprise architecture role relative to agility specifies the architecture roles as well as the agile protocols they will participate in.
    This statement will guide every architect’s participation in planning meetings, pre- and post-PI, syncs, etc. Use simple and concise terminology; speak loudly and clearly.

    A strong EA role statement relative to agility has the following characteristics:

    • Describes what different architect roles do to achieve the vision of the organization
    • In an agile way
    • Compelling
    • Easy to grasp
    • Sharply focused
    • Specific
    • Concise

    Sample EA mission relative to agility

    • Create strategies that provide guardrails for the organization, provide standards, reusable assets, accelerators, and other decisions at the enterprise level that support agility.
    • Participate in pre-PI and post-PI planning activities, architect syncs, etc.

    A clear statement can include additional details surrounding the Enterprise Architect role relative to agility

    Likewise, below is a sample of connecting keywords together to form an enterprise architect role statement, relative to agility.

    Optimize, transform, and innovate by defining and implementing the [Company]’s target enterprise architecture in an agile way.

    Optimize – We collaborate with the business to analyze and optimize business capabilities and business processes to enable the agile and efficient attainment of [Company name] business objectives.

    Transform – We support IT-enabled business transformation programs by building and maintaining a shared vision of the future-state enterprise and consistently communicating it to stakeholders.

    Innovate – We identify and develop new and creative opportunities for IT to enable the business. We communicate the art of the possible to the business.

    Defining and implementing – We engage with project teams early and guide solution design and selection to ensure alignment to the target-state enterprise architecture and provide guidance as well as accelerators.

    Target enterprise structure in an agile way – We analyze business needs and priorities and assess the current state of the enterprise. We build and maintain the target enterprise architecture blueprints that define:

    • Business capabilities and processes (business architecture)
    • Data, application, and technology assets that enable business capabilities and processes (technology architecture)
    • Architecture principles
    • Standards and reusable assets
    • Continuous exploration, integration, and deployment

    Move to the enterprise architecture operating model blueprint to execute your EA strategy

    Once approved, move on to Info-Tech’s Define an EA Operating Model blueprint to begin executing on the EA strategy.

    Enterprise architecture strategy

    This blueprint focuses on setting up an enterprise architecture function, with the goal of maximizing the likelihood of EA success. The blueprint puts into place the components that will align the EA function with the needs of the stakeholders, guide the decision making of the EA function, and define the services EA can provide to the organization.

    Agile enterprise architecture operating model

    An EA operating model helps you design and organize the EA function, ensuring adherence to architectural standards and delivery of EA services. This blueprint acts on the EA strategy by creating methods to engage, govern, and develop architecture as a part of the larger organization.

    Research contributors and experts

    Photo of Milena Litoiu, Senior Director Research and Advisory, Enterprise Architecture Milena Litoiu
    Senior Director Research and Advisory, Enterprise Architecture
    • Milena Litoiu is a Principal/Senior Manager of Enterprise Architecture. She is Master Certified with The Open Group and she sits on global architecture certification boards.
    • Other certifications include SABSA, CRISC, and Scaled Agile Framework. She started as a certified IT Architect at IBM and has over 25 years experience in this field.
    • Milena teaches enterprise architecture at the University of Toronto and led the development of the Enterprise Architecture Certificate (a course on EA fundamentals, one on EA development and Governance, and one on Trends going forward).
    • She has a Masters in Engineering, an executive MBA, and extensive experience in enterprise architecture as well as methodologies and tools.
    Photo of Lan Nguyen, IT Executive, Mentor, Managing Partner at CIOs Beyond Borders Group Lan Nguyen
    IT Executive, Mentor, Managing Partner at CIOs Beyond Borders Group
    • Lan Nguyen has a wealth of experience driving the EA strategy and the digital transformation success at the City of Toronto.
    • Lan is a university lecturer on topics like strategic leadership in the digital enterprise.
    • Lan is a Managing Partner at CIOs Beyond Borders Group.
    • Lan specializes in Partnership Development; Governance; Strategic Planning, Business Development; Government Relations; Business Relationship Management; Leadership Development; Organizational Agility and Change Management; Talent Management; Managed Services; Digital Transformation; Strategic Management of Enterprise IT; Shared Services; Service Quality Improvement, Portfolio Management; Community Development; and Social Enterprise.


    Photo of Dirk Coetsee, Director Research and Advisory, Enterprise Architecture, Data & Analytics Dirk Coetsee
    Director Research and Advisory, Enterprise Architecture, Data & Analytics
    • Dirk Coetsee is a Research & Advisory Director in the Data & Analytics practice. Dirk has over 25 years of experience in data management and architecture within a wide range of industries, especially Financial Services, Manufacturing, and Retail.
    • Dirk spearheaded data architecture at several organizations and was involved in enterprise data architecture, data governance, and data quality and analytics. He architected many operational data stores of ranging complexity and transaction volumes and was part of major enterprise data warehouse initiatives. Lately, he was part of projects that implemented big data, enterprise service bus, and micro services architectures. Dirk has an in-depth knowledge of industry models within the financial and retail spaces.
    • Dirk holds a BSc (Hons) in Operational Research and an MBA with specialization in Financial Services from the University of Pretoria, South Africa.
    Photo of Andy Neill, AVP, Enterprise Architecture, Data and Analytics Andy Neill
    AVP, Enterprise Architecture, Data and Analytics
    • Andy is AVP Data and Analytics and Chief Enterprise Architect at Info-Tech Research Group. Previous roles include leading the data architecture practice for Loblaw Companies Ltd, Shoppers Drug Mart and 360 Insights in Canada as well as leading architecture practices at Siemens consultancy, BBC, NHS, Ordnance Survey, and Houses of Parliament and Commons in the UK.
    • His responsibilities at Info-Tech include leading the data and analytics and enterprise architecture research practices and guiding the future of research and client engagement in that space.
    • Andy is the Product Owner for the Technical Counselor seat offering at Info-Tech, which gives world-class holistic support to our senior technical members.
    • He is also a instructor and content creator for the University of Toronto in the field of Enterprise Architecture.


    Photo of Wayne Filin-Matthews, Chief Enterprise Architect, ICMG Winner of Global Chief Enterprise Architect of the Year 2019 Wayne Filin-Matthews
    Chief Enterprise Architect, ICMG Winner of Global Chief Enterprise Architect of the Year 2019
    • Wayne is currently the EA Discipline Lead/Chief Enterprise Architect – Global Digital Transformation Office, COE at Dell Technologies.
    • He is a distinguished Motivator & Tech Lead as well as an influencer.
    • Wayne has led multiple Enterprise Architecture practices at the global level and has valuable contributions in this space managing and growing Enterprise Architecture and CTO practices across strategy, execution, and adoption parts of the IT lifecycle.
    Photo of Graham Smith, Experienced lead Enterprise Architect and Independent Consultant Graham Smith
    Experienced lead Enterprise Architect and Independent Consultant
    • Graham is an experienced lead enterprise architect specializing in digital and data transformation, with over 33 years of experience, spanning financial markets, media, information, insurance, and telecommunications sectors. Graham has successfully established and led large teams across India, China, Australia, Americas, Japan, and the UK.
    • He is currently working as an independent consultant in digital and data-led transformation and his work spans established businesses and start-ups alike.

    Thanks also go to all experts who contributed to previous versions of this document:

    • Zachary Curry, Director, Enterprise Architecture and Innovation, FMC Technologies
    • Pam Doucette, Director of Enterprise Architecture, Tufts Health Plan
    • Joe Evers, Consulting Principal, JcEvers Consulting Corp
    • Cameron Fairbairn, Enterprise Architect, Agriculture Financial Services Corporation (AFSC)
    • Michael Fulton, Chief Digital Officer & Senior IT Strategy & Architecture Consultant at CC and C Solutions
    • Tom Graves, Principal Consultant, Tetradian Consulting
    • (JB) Brahmaiah Jarugumilli, Consultant, Federal Aviation Administration – Enterprise Services Center
    • Huw Morgan, IT Research Executive, Enterprise Architect
    • Serge Parisien, Manager, Enterprise Architecture, Canada Mortgage & Housing Corporation

    Additional interviews were conducted but are not listed due to privacy and confidentiality requirements.

    Bibliography

    “Agile Manifesto for Software Development,” Ward Cunningham, 2001. Accessed July 2021.

    “ArchiMate 3.1 Specification.” The Open Group, n.d. Accessed July 2021.

    “Are Your IT Strategy and Business Strategy Aligned?” 5Q Partners, 8 Jan. 2015. Accessed Oct. 2016.

    Bowen, Fillmore. “How agile companies create and sustain high ROI.” IBM. Accessed Oct. 2016.

    Burns, Peter, et al. Building Value through Enterprise Architecture: A Global Study. Booz & Co. 2009. Web. Nov. 2016.

    “Demonstrating the Value of Enterprise Architecture in Delivering Business Capabilities.” Cisco, 2008. Web. Oct. 2016.

    “Disciplined Agile.” Disciplined Agile Consortium, n.d. Web.

    Fowler, Martin. “Building Effective software.” MartinFowler.com. Accessed July 2021.

    Fowler, Martin. “Agile Software Guide.” MartinFowler.com, 1 Aug. 2019.

    Accessed July 2021.

    Haughey, Duncan. “SMART Goals.” Project Smart, 2014. Accessed July 2021.

    Kern, Matthew. “20 Enterprise Architecture Practices.” LinkedIn, 3 March 2016. Accessed Nov. 2016.

    Lahanas, Stephen. “Infrastructure Architecture, Defined.” IT Architecture Journal, Sept. 2014. Accessed July 2021.

    Lean IX website, Accessed July 2021.

    Litoiu, Milena. Course material from Information Technology 2690: Foundations of Enterprise Architecture, 2021, University of Toronto.

    Mocker, M., J.W. Ross, and C.M. Beath. “How Companies Use Digital Technologies to Enhance Customer Findings.” MIT CISR Working Paper No. 434, Feb. 2019. Qtd in Mayor, Tracy. “MIT expert recaps 30-plus years of enterprise architecture.” MIT Sloan, 10 Aug. 2020. Web.

    “Open Agile ArchitectureTM.” The Open Group, 2020. Accessed July 2021.

    “Organizational Design Framework – The Transformation Model.” The Center for Organizational Design, n.d. Accessed 1 Aug. 2020.

    Ross, Jeanne W. et al. Enterprise Architecture as Strategy: Creating a Foundation for Business Execution. Harvard Business School Press, 2006.

    Rouse, Margaret. “Enterprise Architecture (EA).” SearchCIO, June 2007. Accessed Nov. 2016.

    “SAFe 5 for Lean Enterprises.” Scaled Agile Framework, Scaled Agile, Inc. Accessed 2021.

    “Security Architecture.” Technopedia, updated 20 Dec. 2016. Accessed July 2021.

    “Software Engineering Institute.” Carnegie Mellon University, n.d. Web.

    “TOGAF 9.1.” The Open Group, 2011. Accessed Oct. 2016.

    “TOGAF 9.2.” The Open Group, 2018. Accessed July 2021.

    Thompson, Rachel. “Stakeholder Analysis: Winning Support for Your Projects.” MindTools, n.d. Accessed July 2021.

    Wendt, Jerome M. “Redefining ‘SMB’, ‘SME’ and ‘Large Enterprise.’” DCIG, 25 Mar. 2011. Accessed July 2021.

    Wilkinson, Jim. “Business Drivers.” The Strategic CFO, 23 July 2013. Accessed July 2021.

    Zachman, John. “Conceptual, Logical, Physical: It is Simple.” Zachman International, 2011. Accessed July 2021.

    Develop an IT Asset Management Strategy

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}295|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 8.5/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $52,211 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 31 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Asset Management
    • Parent Category Link: /asset-management

    You have a mandate to create an accurate and actionable database of the IT assets in your environment, but:

    • The data you have is often incomplete or wrong.
    • Processes are broken or non-existent.
    • Your tools aren’t up to the task of tracking ever more hardware, software, and relevant metadata.
    • The role of stakeholders outside the core ITAM team isn’t well defined or understood.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    ITAM is a foundational IT service that provides accurate, accessible, actionable data on IT assets. But there’s no value in data for data’s sake. Enable collaboration between IT asset managers, business leaders, and IT leaders to develop an ITAM strategy that maximizes the value they can deliver as service providers.

    Impact and Result

    • Develop an approach and strategy for ITAM that is sustainable and aligned with your business priorities.
    • Clarify the structure for the ITAM program, including scope, responsibility and accountability, centralization vs. decentralization, outsourcing vs. insourcing, and more.
    • Create a practical roadmap to guide improvement.
    • Summarize your strategy and approach using Info-Tech’s templates for review with stakeholders.

    Develop an IT Asset Management Strategy Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Develop an IT Asset Management Strategy – A methodology to create a business-aligned, coherent, and durable approach to ITAM.

    This two-phase, step-by-step methodology will guide you through the activities to build a business-aligned, coherent, and durable approach to ITAM. Review the executive brief at the start of the slide deck for an overview of the methodology and the value it can provide to your organization.

    • Develop an IT Asset Management Strategy – Phases 1-2

    2. ITAM Strategy Template – A presentation-ready repository for the work done as you define your ITAM approach.

    Use this template to document your IT asset management strategy and approach.

    • ITAM Strategy Template

    3. IT Asset Estimations Tracker – A rough-and-ready inventory exercise to help you evaluate the work ahead of you.

    Use this tool to estimate key data points related to your IT asset estate, as well as your confidence in your estimates.

    • IT Asset Estimations Tracker

    Infographic

    Workshop: Develop an IT Asset Management Strategy

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Identify ITAM Priorities & Goals, Maturity, Metrics and KPIs

    The Purpose

    Align key stakeholders to the potential strategic value of the IT asset management practice.

    Ensure the ITAM practice is focused on business-aligned goals.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Define a business-aligned direction and expected outcomes for your ITAM program.

    Activities

    1.1 Brainstorm ITAM opportunities and challenges.

    1.2 Conduct an executive alignment working session.

    1.3 Set ITAM priorities, goals and tactics.

    1.4 Identify target and current state ITAM maturity.

    Outputs

    ITAM opportunities and challenges

    Align executive priorities with ITAM opportunities.

    ITAM metrics and KPIs

    ITAM maturity

    2 Identify Your Approach to Support ITAM Priorities and Goals

    The Purpose

    Translate goals into specific and coherent actions to enable your ITAM practice to deliver business value.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A business-aligned approach to ITAM, encompassing scope, structure, tools, audits, budgets, documentation and more.

    A high-level roadmap to achieve your vision for the ITAM practice.

    Activities

    2.1 Define ITAM scope.

    2.2 Acquire ITAM services (outsourcing and contracting).

    2.3 Centralize or decentralize ITAM capabilities.

    2.4 Create a RACI for the ITAM practice.

    2.5 Align ITAM with other service management practices.

    2.6 Evaluate ITAM tools and integrations.

    2.7 Create a plan for internal and external audits.

    2.8 Improve your budget processes.

    2.9 Establish a documentation framework.

    2.10 Create a roadmap and communication plan.

    Outputs

    Your ITAM approach

    ITAM roadmap and communication plan

    Further reading

    Develop an IT Asset Management Strategy

    Define your business-aligned approach to ITAM.

    Table of Contents

    4 Analyst Perspective

    5 Executive Summary

    17 Phase 1: Establish Business-Aligned ITAM Goals and Priorities

    59 Phase 2: Support ITAM Goals and Priorities

    116 Bibliography

    Develop an IT Asset Management Strategy

    Define your business-aligned approach to ITAM.

    EXECUTIVE BRIEF

    Analyst Perspective

    Track hardware and software. Seems easy, right?

    It’s often taken for granted that IT can easily and accurately provide definitive answers to questions like “how many laptops do we have at Site 1?” or “do we have the right number of SQL licenses?” or “how much do we need to budget for device replacements next year?” After all, don’t we know what we have?

    IT can’t easily provide these answers because to do so you must track hardware and software throughout its lifecycle – which is not easy. And unfortunately, you often need to respond to these questions on very short notice because of an audit or to support a budgeting exercise.

    IT Asset Management (ITAM) is the solution. It’s not a new solution – the discipline has been around for decades. But the key to success is to deploy the practice in a way that is sustainable, right-sized, and maximizes value.

    Use our practical methodology to develop and document your approach to ITAM that is aligned with the goals of your organization.

    Photo of Andrew Sharp, Research Director, Infrastructure & Operations Practice, Info-Tech Research Group.

    Andrew Sharp
    Research Director
    Infrastructure & Operations Practice
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Realize the value of asset management

    Cost optimization, application rationalization and reduction of technical debt are all considered valuable to right-size spending and improve service outcomes. Without access to accurate data, these activities require significant investments of time and effort, starting with creation of point-in-time inventories, which lengthens the timeline to reaching project value and may still not be accurate.

    Cost optimization and reduction of technical debt should be part of your culture and technical roadmap rather than one-off projects. Why? Access to accurate information enables the organization to quickly make decisions and pivot plans as needed. Through asset management, ongoing harvest and redeployment of assets improves utilization-to-spend ratios. We would never see any organization saying, “We’ve closed our year end books, let’s fire the accountants,” but often see this valuable service relegated to the back burner. Similar to the philosophy that “the best time to plant a tree is 20 years ago and the next best time is now,” the sooner you can start to collect, validate, and analyze data, the sooner you will find value in it.

    Photo of Sandi Conrad, Principal Research Director, Infrastructure & Operations Practice, Info-Tech Research Group.

    Sandi Conrad
    Principal Research Director
    Infrastructure & Operations Practice
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    You have a mandate to create an accurate and actionable database of the IT assets in your environment, but:

    • The data you have is often incomplete or wrong.
    • Processes are broken or non-existent.
    • Your tools aren’t up to the task of tracking ever more hardware, software, and relevant metadata.
    • The role of stakeholders outside the core ITAM team isn’t well defined or understood.
    Common Obstacles

    It is challenging to make needed changes because:

    • There’s cultural resistance to asset tracking, it’s seen as busywork that doesn’t clearly create value.
    • Decentralized IT teams aren’t generating the data required to track hardware and licenses.
    • ITAM can’t direct needed tool improvements because the admins don’t report to ITAM.
    • It’s hard to find time to improve processes given the day-to-day demands on your time.
    Info-Tech’s Approach
    • Develop an approach and strategy for ITAM that is sustainable and aligned with your business priorities.
    • Clarify the structure for the ITAM program, including scope, responsibility and accountability, centralization vs. decentralization, outsourcing vs. insourcing, and more.
    • Create a practical roadmap to guide improvement.
    • Summarize your strategy and approach using Info-Tech’s templates for review with stakeholders.

    Info-Tech Insight

    ITAM is a foundational IT service that provides accurate, accessible, actionable data on IT assets. But there’s no value in data for data’s sake. Enable collaboration between IT asset managers, business leaders, and IT leaders to develop an ITAM strategy that maximizes the value they can deliver as service providers.

    Unlock business value with IT asset management

    • IT asset management (ITAM) is the practice of maintaining accurate, accessible, and actionable data on the assets within the organization’s IT estate. Each IT asset will have a record that tracks it across its lifecycle from purchase to disposal.
    • ITAM’s value is realized through other processes and practice areas that can leverage ITAM data to manage risk, improve IT services, and control costs.
    • Develop an approach to ITAM that maximizes the value delivered to the business and IT. ITAM succeeds when its partners succeed at delivering business value, and it fails when it doesn’t show value to those partners.

    This blueprint will help you develop your approach for the management of IT hardware and software, including cloud services. Leverage other Info-Tech methodologies to dive directly into developing hardware asset management procedures, software asset management procedures, or to implement configuration management best practices.

    Info-Tech Members report significant savings from implementing our hardware and software asset management frameworks. In order to maximize value from the process-focused methodologies below, develop your ITAM strategy first.

    Implement Hardware Asset Management (Based on Info-Tech Measured Value Surveys results from clients working through these blueprints, as of February 2022.)

    9.6/10

    $23k

    32

    Overall Impact Average $ Saved Average Days Saved
    Implement Software Asset Management (Based on Info-Tech Measured Value Surveys results from clients working through these blueprints, as of February 2022.)

    9.0/10

    $12k

    5

    Overall Impact Average $ Saved Average Days Saved

    ITAM provides both early and ongoing value

    ITAM isn’t one-and-done. Properly supported, your ITAM practice will deliver up-front value that will help demonstrate the value ongoing ITAM can offer through the maintenance of an accurate, accessible, and actionable ITAM database.

    Example: Software Savings from ITAM



    This chart shows the money saved between the first quote and the final price for software and maintenance by a five-person ITAM team. Over a year and a half, they saved their organization a total of $7.5 million from a first quote total of $21 million over that period.

    This is a perfect example of the direct value that ITAM can provide on an ongoing basis to the organization, when properly supported and integrated with IT and the business.

    Examples of up-front value delivered in the first year of the ITAM practice:

    • Save money by reviewing and renegotiating critical, high-spend, and undermanaged software and service contracts.
    • Redeploy or dispose of clearly unused hardware and software.
    • Develop and enforce standards for basic hardware and software.
    • Improve ITAM data quality and build trust in the results.

    Examples of long-term value from ongoing governance, management, and operational ITAM activities:

    • Optimize spend: Reallocate unused hardware and software, end unneeded service agreements, and manage renewals and audits.
    • Reduce risk: Provide comprehensive asset data for security controls development and incident management; manage equipment disposal.
    • Improve IT service: Support incident, problem, request, and change management with ITAM data. Develop new solutions with an understanding of what you have already.

    Common obstacles

    The rulebook is available, but hard to follow
    • ITAM takes a village, but stakeholders aren’t aware of their role. ITAM processes rely on technicians to update asset records, vendors to supply asset data, administrators to manage tools, leadership to provide direction and support, and more.
    • Constant change in the IT and business environment undermines the accuracy of ITAM records (e.g. licensing and contract changes, technology changes that break discovery tools, personnel and organizational changes).
    • Improvement efforts are overwhelmed by day-to-day activities. One study found that 83% of SAM teams’ time is consumed by audit-related activities. (Flexera State of ITAM Report 2022) A lack of improvement becomes a vicious cycle when stakeholders who don’t see the value of ITAM decline to dedicate resources for improvement.
    • Stakeholders expect ITAM tools to be a cure-all, but even at their best, they can’t provide needed answers without some level of configuration, manual input, and supervision.
    • There’s often a struggle to connect ITAM to value. For example, respondents to Info-Tech’s Management & Governance Diagnostic consistently rank ITAM as less important than other processes that ITAM directly supports (e.g. budget management and budget optimization). (Info-Tech MGD Diagnostic (n=972 unique organizations))
    ITAM is a mature discipline with well-established standards, certifications, and tools, but we still struggle with it.
    • Only 28% of SAM teams track IaaS and PaaS spend, and only 35% of SAM teams track SaaS usage.
    • Increasing SAM maturity is a challenge for 76% of organizations.
    • 10% of organizations surveyed have spent more than $5 million in the last three years in audit penalties and true-ups.
    • Half of all of organizations lack a viable SAM tool.
    • Seventy percent of SAM teams have a shortfall of qualified resources.
    • (Flexera State of ITAM Report 2022)

    Info-Tech's IT Asset Management Framework (ITAM)

    Adopt, manage, and mature activities to enable business value thorugh actionable, accessible, and accurate ITAM data

    Logo for Info-Tech Research Group. Enable Business Value Logo for #iTRG.
    Business-Aligned Spend
    Optimization and Transparency
    Facilitate IT Services
    and Products
    Actionable, Accessible,
    and Accurate Data
    Context-Aware Risk Management
    and Security Controls

    Plan & Govern

    Business Goals, Risks, and Structure
    • ITAM Goals & Priorities
    • Roles, Accountability, Responsibilities
    • Scope
    Ongoing Management Commitment
    • Resourcing & Funding
    • Policies & Enforcement
    • Continuous Improvement
    Culture
    • ITAM Education, Awareness & Training
    • Organizational Change Management
    Section title 'Operate' with a cycle surrounding key components of Operate: 'Data Collection & Validation', 'Tool Administration', 'License Management', and 'Lease Management'. The cycle consists of 'Request', 'Procure', 'Receive', 'Deploy', 'Manage', 'Retire & Dispose', and back to 'Request'.

    Build & Manage

    Tools & Data
    • ITAM Tool Selection & Deployment
    • Configuration Management Synchronization
    • IT Service Management Integration
    Process
    • Process Management
    • Data & Process Audits
    • Document Management
    People, Policies, and Providers
    • Stakeholder Management
    • Technology Standardization
    • Vendor & Contract Management

    Info-Tech Insight

    ITAM is a foundational IT service that provides actionable, accessible, and accurate data on IT assets. But there's no value in data for data's sake. Use this methodology to enable collaboration between ITAM, the business, and IT to develop an approach to ITAM that maximizes the value the ITAM team can deliver as service providers.

    Key deliverable

    IT asset management requires ongoing practice – you can’t just implement it and walk away.

    Our methodology will help you build a business-aligned strategy and approach for your ITAM practice with the following outputs:

    • Business-aligned ITAM priorities, opportunities, and goals.
    • Current and target state ITAM maturity.
    • Metrics and KPIs.
    • Roles, responsibilities, and accountability.
    • Insourcing, outsourcing, and (de)centralization.
    • Tools and technology.
    • A documentation framework.
    • Initiatives, a roadmap, and a communication plan.
    Each step of this blueprint is designed to help you create your IT asset management strategy:
    Sample of Info-Tech's key deliverable 'IT Asset Management' blueprint.

    Info-Tech’s methodology to develop an IT asset management strategy

    1. Establish business-aligned ITAM goals and priorities 2. Identify your approach to support ITAM priorities and goals
    Phase Steps
    • 1.1 Define ITAM and brainstorm opportunities and challenges.
    • Executive Alignment Working Session:
    • 1.2 Review organizational priorities, strategy, and key initiatives.
    • 1.3 Align executive priorities with ITAM opportunities and priorities.
    • 1.4 Identify business-aligned ITAM goals and target maturity.
    • 1.5 Write mission and vision statements.
    • 1.6 Define ITAM metrics and KPIs.
    • 2.1 Define ITAM scope.
    • 2.2 Acquire ITAM services (outsourcing and contracting).
    • 2.3 Centralize or decentralize ITAM capabilities.
    • 2.4 Create a RACI for the ITAM practice.
    • 2.5 Align ITAM with other service management practices.
    • 2.6 Evaluate ITAM tools and integrations.
    • 2.7 Create a plan for internal and external audits.
    • 2.8 Improve your budget processes.
    • 2.9 Establish a documentation framework.
    • 2.10 Create a roadmap and communication plan.
    Phase Outcomes Defined, business-aligned goals and priorities for ITAM. Establish an approach to achieving ITAM goals and priorities including scope, structure, tools, service management integrations, documentation, and more.
    Project Outcomes Develop an approach and strategy for ITAM that is sustainable and aligned with your business priorities.

    Insight Summary

    There’s no value in data for data’s sake

    ITAM is a foundational IT service that provides accurate, accessible, actionable data on IT assets. Enable collaboration between IT asset managers, business leaders, and IT leaders to develop an approach to ITAM that maximizes the value they can deliver as service providers.

    Service provider to a service provider

    ITAM is often viewed (when it’s viewed at all) as a low-value administrative task that doesn’t directly drive business value. This can make it challenging to build a case for funding and resources.

    Your ITAM strategy is a critical component to help you define how ITAM can best deliver value to your organization, and to stop creating data for the sake of data or just to fight the next fire.

    Collaboration over order-taking

    To align ITAM practices to deliver organizational value, you need a very clear understanding of the organization’s goals – both in the moment and as they change over time.

    Ensure your ITAM team has clear line of sight to business strategy, objectives, and decision-makers, so you can continue to deliver value as priorities change

    Embrace dotted lines

    ITAM teams rely heavily on staff, systems, and data beyond their direct area of control. Identify how you will influence key stakeholders, including technicians, administrators, and business partners.

    Help them understand how ITAM success relies on their support, and highlight how their contributions have created organizational value to encourage ongoing support.

    Project benefits

    Benefits for IT
    • Set a foundation and direction for an ITAM practice that will allow IT to manage risk, optimize spend, and enhance services in line with business requirements.
    • Establish accountability and responsibility for essential ITAM activities. Decide where to centralize or decentralize accountability and authority. Identify where outsourcing could add value.
    • Create a roadmap with concrete, practical next steps to develop an effective, right-sized ITAM practice.
    Stock image of a trophy. Benefits for the business
    • Plan and control technology spend with confidence based on trustworthy ITAM data.
    • Enhance IT’s ability to rapidly and effectively support new priorities and launch new projects. Effective ITAM can support more streamlined procurement, deployment, and management of assets.
    • Implement security controls that reflect your total technology footprint. Reduce the risk that a forgotten device or unmanaged software turns your organization into the next Colonial Pipeline.

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    Guided Implementation

    Workshop

    Consulting

    "Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful." "Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track." "We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place." "Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project."

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

    Guided Implementation

    A Guided Implementation (GI) is a series of calls with an Info-Tech analyst to help implement our best practices in your organization.

    A typical GI around 12 calls over the course of 6 months.

    What does a typical GI on this topic look like?

    Call #1: Scope requirements, objectives, and your specific challenges.

    Call #2: Review business priorities.

    Call #3: Identify ITAM goals & target maturity.

    Call #4: Identify metrics and KPIs. Call #5: Define ITAM scope.

    Call #6: Acquire ITAM services.

    Call #7: ITAM structure and RACI.

    Call #8: ITAM and service management.

    Tools and integrations.

    Call #10: Internal and external audits.

    Call #11: Budgets & documentation

    Call #12: Roadmap, comms plan. Wrap-up.

    Phase 1 Phase 2

    Workshop Overview

    Contact your account representative for more information.
    workshops@infotech.com1-888-670-8889
    Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5
    Identify ITAM priorities & goals, maturity, metrics and KPIs
    Identify your approach to support ITAM priorities and goals
    Next Steps and wrap-Up (offsite)
    Activities

    1.1 Define ITAM.

    1.2 Brainstorm ITAM opportunities and challenges.

    Conduct an executive alignment working session:

    1.3 Review organizational priorities, strategy, and key initiatives.

    1.4 Align executive priorities with ITAM opportunities.

    1.5 Set ITAM priorities.

    2.1 Translate opportunities into ITAM goals and tactics.

    2.2 Identify target and current state ITAM maturity.

    2.3 Create mission and vision statements.

    2.4 Identify key ITAM metrics and KPIs.

    3.1 Define ITAM scope.

    3.2 Acquire ITAM services (outsourcing and contracting)

    3.3 Centralize or decentralize ITAM capabilities.

    3.4 Create a RACI for the ITAM practice.

    3.5 Align ITAM with other service management practices.

    3.6 Evaluate ITAM tools and integrations.

    4.1 Create a plan for internal and external audits.

    4.2 Improve your budget processes.

    4.3 Establish a documentation framework and identify documentation gaps.

    4.4 Create a roadmap and communication plan.

    5.1 Complete in-progress deliverables from previous four days.

    5.2 Set up review time for workshop deliverables and to discuss next steps.

    Deliverables
    1. ITAM opportunities and challenges.
    2. Align executive priorities with ITAM opportunities.
    3. Set ITAM priorities.
    1. ITAM goals and tactics.
    2. Current and target ITAM maturity.
    3. Mission and vision statements.
    4. ITAM metrics and KPIs.
    1. Decisions that will shape your ITAM approach, including:
      1. What’s in scope (hardware, software, and cloud services).
      2. Where to centralize, decentralize, or outsource ITAM activities.
      3. Accountability, responsibility, and structure for ITAM activities.
      4. Service management alignment, tooling gaps, audit plans, budget processes, and required documentation.
    2. A roadmap and communication plan.
    1. Your completed ITAM strategy template.
    Develop an IT Asset Management Strategy

    Phase 1:

    Establish business-aligned ITAM goals and priorities

    Phase 1

    1.1 Define ITAM and brainstorm opportunities and challenges.

    Executive Alignment Working Session:

    1.2 Review organizational priorities, strategy, and key initiatives.

    1.3 Align executive priorities with ITAM opportunities & priorities.

    1.4 Identify business-aligned ITAM goals and target maturity.

    1.5 Write mission and vision statements.

    1.6 Define ITAM metrics and KPIs.

    Phase 2

    2.1 Define ITAM scope.

    2.2 Acquire ITAM services (outsourcing and contracting).

    2.3 Centralize or decentralize ITAM capabilities.

    2.4 Create a RACI for the ITAM practice.

    2.5 Align ITAM with other service management practices.

    2.6 Evaluate ITAM tools and integrations.

    2.7 Create a plan for internal and external audits.

    2.8 Improve your budget processes.

    2.9 Establish a documentation framework.

    2.10 Create a roadmap and communication plan.

    Phase Outcomes:

    Defined, business-aligned goals, priorities, and KPIs for ITAM. A concise vision and mission statement. The direction you need to establish a practical, right-sized, effective approach to ITAM for your organization.

    Before you get started

    Set yourself up for success with these three steps:
    • This methodology and the related slides are intended to be executed via intensive, collaborative working sessions using the rest of this slide deck.
    • Ensure the working sessions are a success by working through these steps before you start work on your IT asset management strategy.

    1. Identify participants

    Review recommended roles and identify who should participate in the development of your ITAM strategy.

    2. Estimate assets managed today

    Work through an initial assessment to establish ease of access to ITAM data and your level of trust in the data available to you.

    3. Create a working folder

    Create a repository to house your notes and any work in progress, including your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template.

    0.1 Identify participants

    30 minutes

    Output: List of key roles for the strategy exercises outlined in this methodology

    Participants: Project sponsor, Lead facilitator, ITAM manager and SMEs

    This methodology relies on having the right stakeholders in the room to identify ITAM goals, challenges, roles, structure, and more. On each activity slide in this deck, you’ll see an outline of the recommended participants. Use the table below to translate the recommended roles into specific people in your organization. Note that some people may fill multiple roles.

    Role Expectations People
    Project Sponsor Accountable for the overall success of the methodology. Ideally, participates in all exercises in this methodology. May be the asset manager or whoever they report to. Jake Long
    Lead Facilitator Leads, schedules, and manages all working sessions. Guides discussions and ensures activity outputs are completed. Owns and understands the methodology. Has a working knowledge of ITAM. Robert Loblaw
    Asset Manager(s) SME for the ITAM practice. Provides strategic direction to mature ITAM practices in line with organizational goals. Supports the facilitator. Eve Maldonado
    ITAM Team Hands-on ITAM professionals and SMEs. Includes the asset manager. Provide input on tactical ITAM opportunities and challenges. Bruce Wayne, Clark Kent
    IT Leaders & Managers Leaders of key stakeholder groups from across the IT department – the CIO and direct reports. Provide input on what IT needs from ITAM, and the role their teams should play in ITAM activities. May include delegates, particularly those familiar with day-to-day processes relevant to a particular discussion or exercise. Marcelina Hardy, Edmund Broughton
    ITAM Business Partners Non-IT business stakeholders for ITAM. This could include procurement, vendor management, accounting, and others. Zhang Jin, Effie Lamont
    Business Executives Organizational leaders and executives (CFO, COO, CEO, and others) or their delegates. Will participate in a mini-workshop to identify organizational goals and initiatives that can present opportunities for the ITAM practice. Jermaine Mandar, Miranda Kosuth

    0.2 Estimate asset numbers

    1 hour

    Output: Estimates of quantity and spend related to IT assets, Confidence/margin of error on estimates

    Participants: IT asset manager, ITAM team

    What do you know about your current IT environment, and how confident are you in that knowledge?

    This exercise will help you evaluate the size of the challenge ahead in terms of the raw number of assets in your environment, the spend on those assets, and the level of trust your organization has in the ITAM data.

    It is also a baseline snapshot your ability to relay key ITAM metrics quickly and confidently, so you can measure progress (in terms of greater confidence) over time.

    1. Download the estimation tracker below. Add any additional line items that are particularly important to the organization.
    2. Time-box this exercise to an hour. Use your own knowledge and existing data repositories to identify count/spend for each line item, then add a margin of error to your guess. Larger margins of error on larger counts will typically indicate larger risks.
    3. Track any assumptions, data sources used, or SMEs consulted in the comments.

    Download the IT Asset Estimation Tracker

    “Any time there is doubt about the data and it doesn’t get explained or fixed, then a new spreadsheet is born. Data validation and maintenance is critical to avoid the hidden costs of having bad data”

    Allison Kinnaird,
    Operations Practice Lead,
    Info-Tech Research Group

    0.3 Create a working folder

    15 minutes

    Output: A repository for templates and work in progress

    Participants: Lead facilitator

    Create a central repository for collaboration – it seems like an obvious step, but it’s one that gets forgotten about
    1. Download a copy of the ITAM Strategy Template.
      1. This will be the repository for all the work you do in the activities listed in this blueprint; take a moment to read it through and familiarize yourself with the contents.
    2. House the template in a shared repository that can house other related work in progress. Share this folder with participants so they can check in on your progress.
    3. You’ll see this callout box: Add your results to your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template as you work through activities in this blueprint. Copy the output to the appropriate slide in the ITAM Strategy Template.
    Stock image of a computer screen with a tiny person putting likes on things.

    Collect action items as you go

    Don’t wait until the end to write down your good ideas.
    • The last exercise in this methodology is to gather everything you’ve learned and build a roadmap to improve the ITAM practice.
    • The output of the exercises will inform the roadmap, as they will highlight areas with opportunities for improvement.
    • Write them down as you work through the exercises, or you risk forgetting valuable ideas.
    • Keep an “idea space” – a whiteboard with sticky notes or a shared document – to which any of your participants can post an idea for improvement and that you can review and consolidate later.
    • Encourage participants to add their ideas at any time during the exercises.
    Pad of sticky notes, the top of which reads 'Good ideas go here!'

    Step 1.1: Brainstorm ITAM opportunities and challenges

    Participants

    • Project sponsor and lead facilitator
    • ITAM team
    • IT leaders and managers
    • ITAM business partners

    Outcomes

    • Rally the working group around a collection of ideas that, when taken together, create a vision for the future ITAM practice.
    • Identify your organization’s current ITAM challenges.

    “ITAM is a cultural shift more than a technology shift.” (Rory Canavan, SAM Charter)

    What is an IT Asset?

    Any piece of technology can be considered an asset, but it doesn’t mean you need to track everything. Image of three people building a computer from the inside.
    Icon of a power button.

    According to the ISO 19770 standard on ITAM, an IT Asset is “[an] item, thing, or entity that can be used to acquire, process, store and distribute digital information and has potential or actual value to an organization.”
    These are all things that IT is expected to support and manage, or that have the potential to directly impact services that IT supports and manages.

    Icon of a half-full battery.

    IT assets are distinct from capital assets. Some IT assets will also be capital assets, but not all will be. And not all capital assets are IT assets, either.

    Icon of a microphone.

    IT assets are typically tracked by IT, not by finance or accounting.
    IT needs more from their IT asset tracking system than the typical finance department can deliver.
    This can include end-user devices, software, IT infrastructure, cloud-based resources, third-party managed IT services, Internet-of-Things devices, embedded electronics, SCADA equipment, “smart” devices, and more.

    Icon of a fingerprint.

    It’s important to track IT assets in a way that enables IT to deliver value to the business – and an important part of this is understanding what not to track. This list should be aligned to the needs of your organization.

    What is IT asset management?

    • IT asset management is the practice of maintaining accurate, accessible, and actionable data on IT hardware, software, and cloud assets from procurement to disposal.
    • Trustworthy data maintained by an IT asset management practice will help your business meet its goals by managing risk, controlling costs, and enabling IT services and products.
    • ITAM tends to focus on the asset itself – its technical, financial, contractual, lifecycle, and ownership attributes – rather than its interactions or connections to other IT assets, which tends to be part of configuration management.

    What IT Asset Management is NOT:

    Configuration Management: Configuration management databases (CMDBs) often draw from the same data pool as ITAM (many configuration items are assets, and vice versa), but they focus on the interaction, interconnection, and interoperation of configuration items within the IT estate.

    In practice, many configuration items will be IT assets (or parts of assets) and vice versa. Configuration and asset teams should work closely together as they develop different but complementary views of the IT environment. Use Info-Tech’s methodology to harness configuration management superpowers.

    Organizational Data Management: Leverage a different Info-Tech methodology to develop a digital and data asset management program within Info-Tech’s DAM framework.

    “Asset management’s job is not to save the organization money, it’s not to push back on software audits.

    It’s to keep the asset database as up-to-date and as trustworthy as possible. That’s it.” (Jeremy Boerger, Consultant & Author)

    “You can’t make any real decisions on CMDB data that’s only 60% accurate.

    You start extrapolating that out, you’re going to get into big problems.” (Mike Austin, Founder & CEO, MetrixData 360)

    What is an ITAM strategy?

    Our strategy document will outline a coherent, sustainable, business-aligned approach to ITAM.

    No single approach to ITAM fits all organizations. Nor will the same approach fit the same organization at different times. A world-leading research university, a state government, and a global manufacturer all have very different goals and priorities that will be best supported by different approaches to ITAM.

    This methodology will walk you through these critical decisions that will define your approach to ITAM:

    • Business-aligned priorities, opportunities, and goals: What pressing opportunities and challenges do we face as an organization? What opportunities does this create that ITAM can seize?
    • Current and future state maturity, challenges: What is the state of the practice today? Where do we need to improve to meet our goals? What challenges stand in the way of improvement?
    • Responsibility, accountability, sourcing and (de)centralization: Who does what? Who is accountable? Where is there value to outsourcing? What authority will be centralized or decentralized?
    • Tools, policies, and procedures: What technology do we need? What’s our documentation framework?
    • Initiatives, KPIs, communication plan, and roadmap: What do we need to do, in what order, to build the ITAM practice to where we need it to be? How long do we expect this to take? How will we measure success?

    “A good strategy has coherence, coordinating actions, policies, and resources so as to accomplish an important end. Most organizations, most of the time, don’t have this.

    Instead, they have multiple goals and initiatives that symbolize progress, but no coherent approach to accomplish that progress other than ‘spend more and try harder.’” (Good Strategy, Bad Strategy, Richard Rumelt)

    Enable business value with IT asset management

    If you’ve never experienced a mature ITAM program before, it is almost certainly more rewarding than you’d expect once it’s functioning as intended.

    Each of the below activities can benefit from accessible, actionable, and accurate ITAM data.

    • Which of the activities, practices, and initiatives below have value to your organization?
    • Which could benefit most from ITAM data?
    Manage Risk: Effective ITAM practices provide data and processes that help mitigate the likelihood and impact of potentially damaging IT risks.

    ITAM supports the following practices that help manage organizational risk:

    • Security Controls Development
    • Security Incident Response
    • Security Audit Reports
    • Regulatory Compliance Reports
    • IT Risk Management
    • Technical Debt Management
    • M&A Due Diligence
    Optimize Spend: Asset data is essential to maintaining oversight of IT spend, ensuring that scarce resources are allocated where they can have the most impact.

    ITAM supports these activities that help optimize spend:

    • Vendor Management & Negotiations
    • IT Budget Management & Variance Analysis
    • Asset Utilization Analysis
    • FinOps & Cloud Spend Optimization
    • Showback & Chargeback
    • Software Audit Defense
    • Application Rationalization
    • Contract Consolidation
    • License and Device Reallocation
    Improve IT Services: Asset data can help inform solutions development and can be used by service teams to enhance and improve IT service practices.

    Use ITAM to facilitate these IT services and initiatives:

    • Solution and Enterprise Architecture
    • Service Level Management
    • Technology Procurement
    • Technology Refresh Projects
    • Incident & Problem Management
    • Request Management
    • Change Management
    • Green IT

    1.1 Brainstorm ideas to create a vision for the ITAM practice

    30 minutes

    Input: Stakeholders with a vision of what ITAM could provide, if resourced and funded adequately

    Output: A collection of ideas that, when taken together, create a vision for the future ITAM practice

    Materials: ITAM strategy template, Whiteboard or virtual whiteboard

    Participants: ITAM team, IT leaders and managers, ITAM business partners

    It can be easy to lose sight of long-term goals when you’re stuck in firefighting mode. Let’s get the working group into a forward-looking mindset with this exercise.

    Think about what ITAM could deliver with unlimited time, money, and technology.

    1. Provide three sticky notes to each participant.
    2. Add the headings to a whiteboard, or use a blank slide as a digital whiteboard
    3. On each sticky note, ask participants to outline a single idea as follows:
      1. We could: [idea]
      2. Which would help: [stakeholder]
      3. Because: [outcome]
    4. Ask participants to present their sticky notes and post them to the whiteboard. Ask later participants to group similar ideas together.

    As you hear your peers describe what they hope and expect to achieve with ITAM, a shared vision of what ITAM could be will start to emerge.

    1.1 Identify structural ITAM challenges

    30 minutes

    Input: The list of common challenges on the next slide, Your estimated visibility into IT assets from the previous exercise, The experience and knowledge of your participants

    Output: Identify current ITAM challenges

    Materials: Your working copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Participants: ITAM team, IT leaders and managers, ITAM business partners

    What’s standing in the way today of delivering the ITAM practices you want to achieve?

    Review the list of common challenges on the next slide as a group.

    1. Delete any challenges that don’t apply to your organization.
    2. Modify any challenges as required to reflect your organization.
    3. Add further challenges that aren’t on the list, as required.
    4. Highlight challenges that are particularly painful.

    Add your results to your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    “The problem – the reason why asset management initiatives keep falling on their face – is that people attack asset management as a problem to solve, instead of a practice and epistemological construct.” (Jeremy Boerger, Consultant & Author)

    1.1 Identify structural ITAM challenges

    Review and update the list of common challenges below to reflect your own organization.

    • Leadership and executives don’t understand the value of asset management and don’t fund or resource it.
    • Tools aren’t fit for purpose, don’t scale, or are broken.
    • There’s a cultural tendency to focus on tools over processes.
    • ITAM data is fragmented across multiple repositories.
    • ITAM data is widely viewed as untrustworthy.
    • Stakeholders respond to vendor audits before consulting ITAM, which leads to confusion and risks penalties.
    • No time for improvement; we’re always fighting fires.
    • We don’t audit our own ITAM data for accuracy.
    • End-user equipment is shared, re-assigned, or disposed without notifying or involving IT.
    • No dedicated resources.
    • Lack of clarity on roles and responsibilities.
    • Technicians don’t track assets consistently; ITAM is seen as administrative busywork.
    • Many ITAM tasks are manual and prone to error.
    • Inconsistent organizational policies and procedures.
    • We try to manage too many hardware types/software titles.
    • IT is not involved in the procurement process.
    • Request and procurement is seen as slow and excessively bureaucratic.
    • Hardware/software standards don’t exist or aren’t enforced.
    • Extensive rogue purchases/shadow IT are challenging to manage via ITAM tools and processes.
    What Else?

    Copy results to your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Step 1.2: Review organizational priorities, strategy, initiatives

    Participants

    • Project sponsor and lead facilitator
    • ITAM team
    • IT leaders and managers
    • Business executives or their delegates

    Outcomes

    • Review organizational priorities and strategy.
    • Identify key initiatives.

    Enter the executives

    Deliver on leadership priorities

    • Your business’ major transformative projects and executive priorities might seem far removed from hardware and software tracking. Why would we start with business strategy and executive priorities as we’re setting goals for the ITAM program?
    • While business executives have (likely) no interest in how software and hardware is tracked, they are accountable for the outcomes ITAM can enable. They are the most likely to understand why and how ITAM can deliver value to the organization.
    • ITAM succeeds by enabling its stakeholders to achieve business outcomes. The next three activities are designed to help you identify how you can enable your stakeholders, and what outcomes are most important from their point of view. Specifically:
      • What are the business’ planned transformational initiatives?
      • What are your highest priority goals?
      • What should the priorities of the ITAM practice be?
    • The answers to these questions will shape your approach to ITAM. Direct input from your leadership and executives – or their delegates – will help ensure you’re setting a solid foundation for your ITAM practice.

    “What outcomes does the organization want from IT asset management? Often, senior managers have a clear vision for the organization and where IT needs to go, and the struggle is to communicate that down.” (Kylie Fowler, ITAM Intelligence)

    Stock image of many hands with different puzzle pieces.

    Executive Alignment Session Overview

    ITAM Strategy Working Sessions

    • Discover & Brainstorm
    • Executive Alignment Working Session
      • 1.2 Review organizational strategy, priorities, and key initiatives
      • 1.3 Align executive priorities with ITAM opportunities, set ITAM priorities
    • ITAM Practice Maturity, Vision & Mission, Metrics & KPIs
    • Scope, Outsourcing, (De)Centralization, RACI
    • Service Management Integration
    • ITAM Tools
    • Audits, Budgets, Documents
    • Roadmap & Comms Plan

    A note to the lead facilitator and project sponsor:
    Consider working through these exercises by yourself ahead of time. As you do so, you’ll develop your own ideas about where these discussions may go, which will help you guide the discussion and provide examples to participants.

    1.2 Review organizational strategy and priorities

    30 minutes

    Input: Organizational strategy documents

    Output: A list of prioritized organizational goals, An initial assessment of how ITAM can support these goals

    Materials: The diagram in the next slide, and/or a whiteboard, Your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Participants: Asset manager, IT leadership, Business executives or delegates

    Welcome your group to the working session and outline the next few exercises using the previous slide.

    Ask the most senior leader present to provide a summary of the following:

    1. What is the vision for the organization?
    2. What are our priorities and what must we absolutely get right?
    3. What do we expect the organization to look like in three years?

    The facilitator or a dedicated note-taker should record key points on a whiteboard or flipchart paper.

    1.2 Identify transformational initiatives

    30 minutes

    Input: Organizational strategy documents

    Output: A list of prioritized organizational goals, An initial assessment of how ITAM can support these goals

    Materials: The diagram in the next slide, and/or a whiteboard, Your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Participants: Asset manager, IT leadership, Business executives or delegates

    Ask the most senior leader present to provide a summary of the following: What transformative business and IT initiatives are planned? When will they begin and end?

    Using one box per initiative, draw the initiatives in a timeline like the one below.

    Sample timeline for ITAM initiatives.

    Add your results to your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Step 1.3: Set business-aligned ITAM priorities

    Participants

    • Project sponsor and lead facilitator
    • ITAM team
    • IT leaders and managers
    • Business executives

    Outcomes

    • Connect executive priorities to ITAM opportunities.
    • Set business-aligned priorities for the ITAM practice.

    1.3 Align executive priorities with ITAM opportunities

    45 minutes

    Input: Organizational strategy documents

    Output: A list of prioritized organizational goals, An initial assessment of how ITAM can support these goals

    Materials: The diagram in the next slide, and/or a whiteboard, Your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Participants: Asset manager, IT leaders and managers, Business executives or delegates

    In this exercise, we’ll use the table on the next slide to identify the top priorities of key business and IT stakeholders and connect them to opportunities for the ITAM practice.

    1. Ask your leadership or executive delegates – what are their goals? What are they trying to accomplish? List roles and related goals in the table.
    2. Brainstorm opportunities for IT asset management to support listed goals:
      1. Can ITAM provide an enhanced level of service, access, or insight?
      2. Can ITAM address an existing issue or mitigate an existing risk?

    Add your results to your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    1.3 Align executive priorities with ITAM opportunities (example)

    ITAM is for the… Who wants to… Which presents these ITAM opportunities
    CEO Deliver transformative business initiatives Acquire the right tech at the right time to support transformational initiatives.
    Establish a data-driven culture of stewardship Improve data to increase IT spend transparency.
    COO Improve organizational efficiency Increase asset use.
    Consolidate major software contracts to drive discounts.
    CFO Accurately forecast spending Track and anticipate IT asset spending.
    Control spending Improve data to increase IT spend transparency.
    Consolidate major software contracts to drive discounts.
    CIO Demonstrate IT value Use data to tell a story about value delivered by IT assets.
    Govern IT use Improve data to increase IT spend transparency.
    CISO Manage IT security and compliance risks Identify abandoned or out-of-spec IT assets.
    Provide IT asset data to support controls development.
    Respond to security incidents Support security incident teams with IT asset data.
    Apps Leader Build, integrate, and support applications Identify opportunities to retire applications with redundant functionality.
    Connect applications to relevant licensing and support agreements.
    IT Infra Leader Build and support IT infrastructure. Provide input on opportunities to standardize hardware and software.
    Provide IT asset data to technicians supporting end users.

    1.3 Categorize ITAM opportunities

    10-15 minutes

    Input: The outputs from the previous exercise

    Output: Executive priorities, sorted into the three categories at the right

    Materials: The table in this slide, The outputs from the previous exercise

    Participants: Lead facilitator

    Give your participants a quick break. Quickly sort the identified ITAM opportunities into the three main categories below as best you can.

    We’ll use this table as context for the next exercise.

    Example: Optimize Spend Enhance IT Services Manage Risk
    ITAM Opportunities
    • Improve data to increase IT spend transparency.
    • Consolidate major software contracts to drive discounts.
    • Increase asset utilization.
    • Identify opportunities to retire applications with redundant functionality
    • Acquire the right tech at the right time to support transformational initiatives.
    • Provide IT asset data to technicians supporting end users.
    • Identify abandoned or out-of-spec IT assets.
    • Provide IT asset data to support controls development.
    • Support security incident teams with IT asset data.

    Add your results to your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    1.3 Set ITAM priorities

    30 minutes

    Input: Organizational strategy documents

    Output: A list of prioritized organizational goals, An initial assessment of how ITAM can support these goals

    Materials: Whiteboard, The template on the next slide, Your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Participants: Asset manager, IT leaders and managers, Business executives or delegates

    The objective of this exercise is to prioritize the outcomes your organization wants to achieve from its ITAM practice, given the context from the previous exercises.

    Review the image below. The three points of the triangle are the three core goals of ITAM: Enhance IT Service, Manage Risk, and Optimize Spend. This exercise was first developed by Kylie Fowler of ITAM Intelligence. It is an essential exercise to understand ITAM priorities and the tradeoffs associated with those priorities. These priorities aren’t set in stone and should be revisited periodically as technology and business priorities change.

    Draw the diagram on the next slide on a whiteboard. Have the most senior leader in the room place the dot on the triangle – the closer it is to any one of the goals, the more important that goal is to the organization. Note: The center of the triangle is off limits! It’s very rarely possible to deliver on all three at once.
    Track notes on what’s being prioritized – and why – in the template on the next slide.
    Triangle with the points labelled 'Enhance IT Service', 'Manage Risk', and 'Optimize Spend'.

    Add your results to your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    1.3 Set ITAM Priorities

    The priorities of the ITAM practice are to:
    • Optimize Spend
    • Manage Risk
    Why?
    • We believe there is significant opportunity right now to rationalize spend by consolidating key software contracts.
    • Major acquisitions are anticipated in the near future. Effective ITAM processes are expected to mitigate acquisition risk by supporting due diligence and streamlined integration of acquired organizations.
    • Ransomware and supply chain security threats have increased demands for a comprehensive accounting of IT assets to support security controls development and security incident response.
    (Update this section with notes from your discussion.)
    Triangle with the points labelled 'Enhance IT Service', 'Manage Risk', and 'Optimize Spend'. There is a dot close to the 'Optimize Spend' corner, a legend labelling the dot as 'Our Target', and a note reading 'Move this dot to reflect your priorities'.

    Step 1.4: Identify ITAM goals, target maturity

    Participants

    • Project sponsor and lead facilitator
    • ITAM team
    • IT leaders and managers

    Outcomes

    • Connect executive priorities to ITAM opportunities.
    • Set business-aligned priorities for the ITAM practice.

    “ITAM is really no different from the other ITIL practices: to succeed, you’ll need some ratio of time, treasure, and talent… and you can make up for less of one with more of the other two.” (Jeremy Boerger, Consultant and Author)

    1.4 Identify near- and medium-term goals

    15-30 minutes

    Input: Organizational strategy documents

    Output: A list of prioritized organizational goals, An initial assessment of how ITAM can support these goals

    Materials: The table in this slide, Your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Participants: ITAM team, IT leaders and managers

    Narrow down the list of opportunities to identify specific goals for the ITAM practice.

    1. Use one color to highlight opportunities you will seize in the next year.
    2. Use a second color to highlight opportunities you plan to address in the next three years.
    3. Leave blank anything you don’t intend to address in this timeframe.

    The highlighted opportunities are your near- and medium-term objectives.

    Optimize Spend Enhance IT Services Manage Risk
    Priority Critical Normal High
    ITAM Opportunities
    • Improve data to increase IT spend transparency.
    • Increase asset utilization.
    • Consolidate major software contracts to drive discounts.
    • Identify opportunities to retire applications with redundant functionality
    • Acquire the right tech at the right time to support transformational initiatives.
    • Provide IT asset data to technicians supporting end users.
    • Identify abandoned or out-of-spec IT assets.
    • Provide IT asset data to support controls development.
    • Support security incident teams with IT asset data.

    1.4 Connect ITAM goals to tactics

    30 minutes

    Input: Organizational strategy documents

    Output: A list of prioritized organizational goals, An initial assessment of how ITAM can support these goals

    Materials: The table in this slide, Your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Participants: ITAM team, IT leaders and managers

    Let’s dig down a little deeper. Connect the list of opportunities from earlier to specific ITAM tactics that allow the team to seize those opportunities.

    Add another row to the earlier table for ITAM tactics. Brainstorm tactics with your participants (e.g. sticky notes on a whiteboard) and align them with the priorities they’ll support.

    Optimize SpendEnhance IT ServicesManage Risk
    PriorityCriticalNormalHigh
    ITAM Opportunities
    • Improve data to increase IT spend transparency.
    • Increase asset utilization.
    • Consolidate major software contracts to drive discounts.
    • Identify opportunities to retire applications with redundant functionality
    • Acquire the right tech at the right time to support transformational initiatives.
    • Provide IT asset data to technicians supporting end users.
    • Identify abandoned or out-of-spec IT assets.
    • Provide IT asset data to support controls development.
    • Support security incident teams with IT asset data.
    ITAM Tactics to Seize Opportunities
    • Review and improve hardware budgeting exercises.
    • Reallocate unused licenses, hardware.
    • Ensure ELP reports are up to date.
    • Validate software usage.
    • Data to support software renewal negotiations.
    • Use info from ITAM for more efficient adds, moves, changes.
    • Integrate asset records with the ticket intake system, so that when someone calls the service desk, the list of their assigned equipment is immediately available.
    • Find and retire abandoned devices or services with access to the organization’s network.
    • Report on lost/stolen devices.
    • Develop reliable disposal processes.
    • Report on unpatched devices/software.

    Add your results to your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    1.4 Identify current and target state

    20 minutes

    Input: Organizational strategy documents

    Output: A list of prioritized organizational goals, An initial assessment of how ITAM can support these goals

    Materials: The table in this slide, Your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Participants: ITAM team, IT leaders and managers

    We’ll use this exercise to identify the current and one-year target state of ITAM using Info-Tech’s ITAM maturity framework.

    1. Review the maturity framework on the next slide as a group.
    2. In one color, highlight statements that reflect your organization today. Summarize your current state. Are you in firefighter mode? Between “firefighter” and “trusted operator”?
    3. In a second color, highlight statements that reflect where you want to be one year from today, taking into consideration the goals and tactics identified in the last exercise.
    4. During a break, copy the highlighted statements to the table on the slide after next, then add this final slide to your working copy of the ITAM Strategy Template.

    Add your results to your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Establish current and target ITAM maturity

    IT maturity ladder with five color-coded levels. Innovator – Optimized Asset Management
    • All items from Business & Technology Partner, plus:
    • Business and IT stakeholders collaborate regularly with the ITAM team to identify new opportunities to leverage or deploy ITAM practices and data to mitigate risks, optimize spend, and improve service. The ITAM program scales with the business.
    Business & Technology Partner – Proactive Asset Management
    • All items from Trusted Operator, plus:
    • The ITAM data is integral to decisions related to budget, project planning, IT architecture, contract renewal, and vendor management. Software and cloud assets are reviewed as frequently as required to manage costs. ITAM data consumers have self-serve access to ITAM data.
    • Continuous improvement practices strengthen ITAM efficiency and effectiveness.
    • ITAM processes, standards, and related policies are regularly reviewed and updated. ITAM teams work closely with SMEs for key tools/systems integrated with ITAM (e.g. AD, ITSM, monitoring tools) to maximize the value and reliability of integrations.
    Trusted Operator – Controls Assets
    • ITAM data for deployed hardware and software is regularly audited for accuracy.
    • Sufficient staff and skills to support asset tracking, including a dedicated IT asset management role. Teams responsible for ITAM data collection cooperate effectively. Policies and procedures are documented and enforced. Key licenses and contracts are available to the ITAM team. Discovery, tracking, and analysis tools support most important use cases.
    Firefighter – Reactive Asset Tracking
    • Data is often untrustworthy, may be fragmented across multiple repositories, and typically requires significant effort to translate or validate before use.
    • Insufficient staff, fragmented or incomplete policies or documentation. Data tracking processes are extremely highly manual. Effective cooperation for ITAM data collection is challenging.
    • ITAM tools are in place, but additional configuration or tooling is needed.
    Unreliable - Struggles to Support
    • No data, or data is typically unusable.
    • No allocated staff, no cooperation between parties responsible for ITAM data collection.
    • No related policies or documentation.
    • Tools are non-existent or not fit-for-purpose.

    Current and target ITAM maturity

    Today:
    Firefighter
    • Data is often untrustworthy, is fragmented across multiple repositories, and typically requires significant effort to translate or validate before use.
    • Insufficient staff, fragmented or incomplete policies or documentation.
    • Tools are non-existent.
    In One Year:
    Trusted Operator
    • ITAM data for deployed hardware and software is regularly audited for accuracy.
    • Sufficient staff and skills to support asset tracking, including a dedicated IT asset management role.
    • Teams responsible for ITAM data collection cooperate effectively.
    • Discovery, tracking, and analysis tools support most important use cases.
    IT maturity ladder with five color-coded levels.

    Innovator – Optimized Asset Management

    Business & Technology Partner – Proactive Asset Management

    Trusted Operator – Controls Assets

    Firefighter – Reactive Asset Tracking

    Unreliable - Struggles to Support

    Step 1.5: Write mission and vision statements

    Participants

    • Project sponsor and lead facilitator
    • ITAM team
    • IT leaders and managers

    Outcomes

    • Write a mission statement that encapsulates the purpose and intentions of the ITAM practice today.
    • Write a vision statement that describes what the ITAM practice aspires to become and achieve.

    Write vision and mission statements

    Create two statements to summarize the role of the ITAM practice today – and where you want it to be in the future.

    Create two short, compelling statements that encapsulate:
    • The vision for what we want the ITAM practice to be in the future; and
    • The mission – the purpose and intentions – of the ITAM practice today.

    Why bother creating mission and vision statements? After all, isn’t it just rehashing or re-writing all the work we’ve just done? Isn’t that (at best) a waste of time?

    There are a few very important reasons to create mission and vision statements:

    • Create a compass that can guide work today and your roadmap for the future.
    • Focus on the few things you must do, rather than the many things you could do.
    • Concisely communicate a compelling vision for the ITAM practice to a larger audience who (let’s face it) probably won’t read the entire ITAM Strategy deck.

    “Brevity is the soul of wit.” (Hamlet, Act 2, Scene 2)

    “Writing is easy. All you have to do is cross out the wrong words.” (Mark Twain)

    1.5 Write an ITAM vision statement

    30 minutes

    Input: Organizational strategy documents

    Output: A list of prioritized organizational goals, An initial assessment of how ITAM can support these goals

    Materials: A whiteboard, Your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Participants: ITAM team, IT Leaders and managers

    Your vision statement describes the ITAM practice as it will be in the far future. It is a target to aspire to, beyond your ability to achieve in the near or medium term.

    Examples of ITAM vision statements:

    Develop the single accurate view of IT assets, available to anyone who needs it.

    Indispensable data brokers that support strategic decisions on the IT environment.

    Provide sticky notes to participants. Write out the three questions below on a whiteboard side by side. Have participants write their answers to the questions and post them below the appropriate question. Give everyone 10 minutes to write and post their ideas.

    1. What’s the desired future state of the ITAM practice?
    2. What needs to be done to achieved this desired state?
    3. How do we want ITAM to be perceived in this desired state?

    Review the answers and combine them into one focused vision statement. Use the 20x20 rule: take no more than 20 minutes and use no more than 20 words. If you’re not finished after 20 minutes, the ITAM manager should make any final edits offline.

    Document your vision statement in your ITAM Strategy Template.

    Add your results to your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    1.5 Write an ITAM mission statement

    30 minutes

    Input: Organizational strategy documents

    Output: A list of prioritized organizational goals, An initial assessment of how ITAM can support these goals

    Materials: The table in this slide, Your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Participants: ITAM team, IT leaders and managers

    Your ITAM mission statement is an expression of what your IT asset management function brings to your organization today. It should be presented in straightforward language that is compelling, easy to understand, and sharply focused.

    Examples of ITAM mission statements:

    Maintain accurate, actionable, accessible on data on all IT assets.

    Support IT and the business with centralized and integrated asset data.

    Provide sticky notes to participants. Write out the questions below on a whiteboard side by side. Have participants write their answers to the questions and post them below the appropriate question. Give everyone 10 minutes to write and post their ideas.

    1. What is our role as the asset management team?
    2. How do we support the IT and business strategies?
    3. What does our asset management function offer that no one else can?

    Review the answers and combine them into one focused vision statement. Use the 20x20 rule: take no more than 20 minutes and use no more than 20 words. If you’re not finished after 20 minutes, the ITAM manager should make any final edits offline.

    Document your vision statement in your ITAM Strategy Template.

    Add your results to your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Step 1.6: Define ITAM metrics and KPIs

    Participants

    • Project sponsor and lead facilitator
    • ITAM team
    • IT leaders and managers

    Outcomes

    • Identify metrics, data, or reports that may be of interest to different consumers of ITAM data.
    • Identify the key performance indicators (KPIs) for the ITAM practice, based on the goals and priorities established earlier.

    Navigate a universe of ITAM metrics

    When you have the data, how will you use it?

    • There’s a dizzying array of potential metrics you can develop and track across your ITAM environment.
    • Different stakeholders will need different data feeds, metrics, reports, and dashboards.
    • Different measures will be useful at different times. You will often need to filter or slice the data in different ways (by department, timeframe, equipment type, etc.)
    • We’ll use the next few exercises to identify the types of metrics that may be useful to different stakeholders and the KPIs to measure progress towards ITAM goals and priorities.

    ITAM Metrics

    • Quantity
      e.g. # of devices or licenses
    • Cost
      e.g. average laptop cost
    • Compliance
      e.g. effective license position reports
    • Progress
      e.g. ITAM roadmap items completed
    • Quality
      e.g. ITAM data accuracy rate
    • Time
      e.g. time to procure/ deploy

    Drill down by:

    • Vendor
    • Date
    • Dept.
    • Product
    • Location
    • Cost Center

    Develop different metrics for different teams

    A few examples:

    • CIOs — CIOs need asset data to govern technology use, align to business needs, and demonstrate IT value. What do we need to budget for hardware and software in the next year? Where can we find money to support urgent new initiatives? How many devices and software titles do we manage compared to last year? How has IT helped the business achieve key goals?
    • Asset Managers — Asset managers require data to help them oversee ITAM processes, technology, and staff, and to manage the fleet of IT assets they’re expected to track. What’s the accuracy rate of ITAM data? What’s the state of integrations between ITAM and other systems and processes? How many renewals are coming up in the next 90 days? How many laptops are in stock?
    • IT Leaders — IT managers need data that can support their teams and help them manage the technology within their mandate. What technology needs to be reviewed or retired? What do we actually manage?
    • Technicians — Service desk technicians need real-time access to data on IT assets to support service requests and incident management – for example, easy access to the list of equipment assigned to a particular user or installed in a particular location.
    • Business Managers and Executives — Business managers and executives need concise, readable dashboards to support business decisions about business use of IT assets. What’s our overall asset spend? What’s our forecasted spend? Where could we reallocate spend?

    1.6 Identify useful ITAM metrics and reports

    60 minutes

    Input: Organizational strategy documents

    Output: A list of prioritized organizational goals, An initial assessment of how ITAM can support these goals

    Materials: The table in this slide, Your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Participants: ITAM team, IT leaders and managers

    Use this exercise to identify as many potentially useful ITAM metrics and reports as possible, and narrow them down to a few high-priority metrics. Leverage the list of example metrics on the next slide for your own exercise. If you have more than six participants, consider splitting into two or more groups, and divide the table between groups to minimize overlap.

    1. List potential consumers of ITAM data in the column on the left.
    2. What type of information do we think this role needs? What questions about IT assets do we get on a regular basis from this role or team?
    3. Review and consolidate the list as a group. Discuss and highlight any metrics the group thinks are a particularly high priority for tracking.
    Role Compliance Quality Quantity Cost Time Progress
    IT Asset Manager Owned devices not discovered in last 60 days Discrepancies between discovery data and ITAM DB records # of corporate-owned devices Spend on hardware (recent and future/ planned) Average time, maximum time to deploy end-user devices Number of ITAM roadmap items in progress
    Service Desk

    Add your results to your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Examples of ITAM metrics

    Compliance Quality Quantity Cost Time/Duration/Age Progress
    Owned devices not discovered in last 60 days Discrepancies between discovery data and ITAM DB records # of corporate-owned devices Spend on hardware (recent and future/planned) Average time, maximum time to deploy end-user devices Number of ITAM roadmap items in progress or completed
    Disposed devices without certificate of destruction Breakage rates (in and out of warranty) by vendor # of devices running software title X, # of licenses for software title X Spend on software (recent and future/planned) Average time, maximum time to deploy end user software Number of integrations between ITAM DB and other sources
    Discrepancies between licenses and install count, by software title RMAs by vendor, model, equipment type Number of requests by equipment model or software title Spend on cloud (recent and future/planned) Average & total time spent on software audit responses Number of records in ITAM database
    Compliance reports (e.g. tied to regulatory compliance or grant funding) Tickets by equipment type or software title Licenses issued from license pool in the last 30 days Value of licenses issued from license pool in the last 30 days (cost avoidance) Devices by age Software titles with an up-to-date ELP report
    Reports on lost and stolen devices, including last assigned, date reported stolen, actions taken User device satisfaction scores, CSAT scores Number of devices retired or donated in last year Number of IT-managed capital assets Number of hardware/software request tickets beyond time-to-fulfil targets Number of devices audited (by ITAM team via self-audit)
    Number of OS versions, unpatched systems Number of devices due for refresh in the next year Spend saved by harvesting unused software Number of software titles, software vendors managed by ITAM team
    Audit accuracy rate Equipment in stock Cost savings from negotiations
    # of users assigned more than one device Number of non-standard devices or requests Dollars charged during audit or true-up

    Differentiate between metrics and KPIs

    Key performance indicators (KPIs) are metrics with targets aligned to goals.

    Targets could include one or more of:

    • Target state (e.g. completed)
    • Target magnitude (e.g. number, percent, rate, dollar amount)
    • Target direction (e.g. trending up or down)

    You may track many metrics, but you should have only a few KPIs (typically 2-3 per objective).

    A breached KPI should be a trigger to investigate and remediate the root cause of the problem, to ensure progress towards goals and priorities can continue.

    Which KPIs you track will change over the life of the practice, as ITAM goals and priorities shift. For example, KPIs may initially track progress towards maturing ITAM practices. Once you’ve reached target maturity, KPIs may shift to track whether the key service targets are being met.

    1.6 Identify ITAM KPIs

    20 minutes

    Input: Organizational strategy documents

    Output: A list of prioritized organizational goals, An initial assessment of how ITAM can support these goals

    Materials: The table in this slide, Your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Participants: ITAM team, IT leaders and managers

    Good KPIs are a more objective measure of whether you’re succeeding in meeting the identified priorities for the ITAM practice.

    Identify metrics that can measure progress or success against the priorities and goals set earlier. Aim for around three metrics per goal. Identify targets for the metric you think are SMART (specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and timebound). Track your work using the example table below.

    Goal Metric Target
    Consolidate major software contracts to drive discounts Amount spent on top 10 software contracts Decrease by 10% by next year
    Customer satisfaction scores with enterprise software Satisfaction is equal to or better than last year
    Value of licenses issued from license pool 30% greater than last year
    Identify abandoned or out-of-spec IT assets # of security incidents involving undiscovered assets Zero
    % devices with “Deployed” status in ITAM DB but not discovered for 30+ days ‹1% of all records in ITAM DB
    Provide IT asset data to technicians for service calls Customer satisfaction scores Satisfaction is equal to or better than last year
    % of end-user devices meeting minimum standards 97%

    Add your results to your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Develop an IT Asset Management Strategy

    Phase 2:

    Identify your approach to support ITAM priorities and goals

    Phase 1

    1.1 Define ITAM and brainstorm opportunities and challenges.

    Executive Alignment Working Session:

    1.2 Review organizational priorities, strategy, and key initiatives.

    1.3 Align executive priorities with ITAM opportunities & priorities.

    1.4 Identify business-aligned ITAM goals and target maturity.

    1.5 Write mission and vision statements.

    1.6 Define ITAM metrics and KPIs.

    Phase 2

    2.1 Define ITAM scope.

    2.2 Acquire ITAM services (outsourcing and contracting).

    2.3 Centralize or decentralize ITAM capabilities.

    2.4 Create a RACI for the ITAM practice.

    2.5 Align ITAM with other service management practices.

    2.6 Evaluate ITAM tools and integrations.

    2.7 Create a plan for internal and external audits.

    2.8 Improve your budget processes.

    2.9 Establish a documentation framework.

    2.10 Create a roadmap and communication plan.

    Phase Outcomes:

    Establish an approach to achieving ITAM goals and priorities, including scope, structure, tools, service management integrations, documentation, and more.

    Create a roadmap that enables you to realize your approach.

    Step 2.1: Define ITAM Scope

    Participants

    • Project sponsor and lead facilitator
    • ITAM team
    • IT leaders and managers
    • ITAM business partners

    Outcomes

    • Establish what types of equipment and software you’ll track through the ITAM practice.
    • Establish which areas of the business will be in scope of the ITAM practice.

    Determine ITAM Scope

    Focus on what’s most important and then document it so everyone understands where they can provide the most value.

    Not all categories of assets require the same level of tracking, and some equipment and software should be excluded from the ITAM practice entirely.

    In some organizations, portions of the environment won’t be tracked by the asset management team at all. For example, some organizations will choose to delegate tracking multi-function printers (MFPs) or proprietary IoT devices to the department or vendor that manages them.

    Due to resourcing or technical limitations, you may decide that certain equipment or software is out of scope for the moment.

    What do other organizations typically track in detail?
    • Installs and entitlements for major software contracts that represent significant spend and/or are highly critical to business goals.
    • Equipment managed directly by IT that needs to be refreshed on a regular cycle:
      • End-user devices such as laptops, desktops, and tablets.
      • Server, network, and telecoms devices.
    • High value equipment that is not regularly refreshed may also be tracked, but in less detail – for example, you may not refresh large screen TVs, but you may need to track date of purchase, deployed location, vendor, and model for insurance or warranty purposes.

    2.1 Establish scope for ITAM

    45 minutes

    Input: Organizational strategy documents

    Output: ITAM scope, in terms of types of assets tracked and not tracked

    Materials: The table in this slide, Your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Participants: ITAM team, IT leaders and managers, ITAM business partners

    Establish the hardware and software that are within the scope of the ITAM program by updating the tables below to reflect your own environment. The “out of scope” category will include asset types that may be of value to track in the future but for which the capability or need don’t exist today.

    Hardware Software Out of Scope
    • End-user devices housing data or with a dollar value of more than $300, which will be replaced through lifecycle refresh.
    • Infrastructure devices, including network, telecom, video conferencing, servers and more
    • End-user software purchased under contract
    • Best efforts on single license purchases
    • Infrastructure software, including solutions used by IT to manage the infrastructure
    • Enterprise applications
    • Cloud (SaaS, IaaS, PaaS)
    • Departmental applications
    • Open-source applications
    • In-house developed applications
    • Freeware & shareware
    • IoT devices

    The following locations will be included in the ITAM program: All North and South America offices and retail locations.

    Add your results to your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Step 2.2: Acquire ITAM Services

    Participants

    • Project sponsor and lead facilitator
    • ITAM team
    • IT leaders and managers
    • ITAM business partners

    Outcomes

    • Define the type of work that may be more effectively or efficiently delivered by an outsourcer or contractor.

    “We would like our clients to come to us with an idea of where they want to get to. Why are you doing this? Is it for savings? Because you want to manage your security attack surface? Are there digital initiatives you want to move forward? What is the end goal?” (Mike Austin, MetrixData 360)

    Effectively acquire ITAM services

    Allow your team to focus on strategic, value-add activities by acquiring services that free them from commodity tasks.
    • When determining which asset capabilities and activities are best kept in-house and which ones are better handled by a supplier, it is imperative to keep the value to the business in mind.
    • Activities/capabilities that are challenging to standardize and are critical to enabling business goals are better kept in-house.
    • Activities/capabilities that are (or should be) standardized and automated are ideal candidates for outsourcing.
    • Outsourcing can be effective and successful with a narrow scope of engagement and an alignment to business outcomes.
    • Organizations that heavily weigh cost reduction as a significant driver for outsourcing are far less likely to realize the value they expected to receive.
    Business Enablement
    • Supports business-aligned ITAM opportunities & priorities
    • Highly specialized
    • Offers competitive advantages
    Map with axes 'Business Enablement' and 'Vendor's Performance Advantage' for determining whether or not to outsource.
    Vendor’s Performance Advantage
    • Talent or access to skills
    • Economies of scale
    • Access to technology
    • Does not require deep knowledge of your business

    Decide what to outsource

    It’s rarely all or nothing.

    Ask yourself:
    • How important is this activity or capability to ITAM, IT, and business priorities and goals?
    • Is it a non-commodity IT service that can improve customer satisfaction?
    • Is it a critical service to the business and the specialized knowledge must remain in-house?
    • Does the function require access to talent or skills not currently available in-house, and is cost-prohibitive to obtain?
    • Are there economies of scale that can help us meet growing demand?
    • Does the vendor provide access to best-of-breed tools and solutions that can handle the integration, management, maintenance and support of the complete system?

    You may ultimately choose to engage a single vendor or a combination of multiple vendors who can best meet your ITAM needs.

    Establishing effective vendor management processes, where you can maximize the amount of service you receive while relying on the vendor’s expertise and ability to scale, can help you make your asset management practice a net cost-saver.

    ITAM activities and capabilities
    • Contract review
    • Software audit management
    • Asset tagging
    • Asset disposal and recycling
    • Initial ITAM record creation
    • End-user device imaging
    • End-user device deployment
    • End-user software provisioning
    • End-user image management
    • ITAM database administration
    • ELP report creation
    • ITAM process management
    • ITAM report generation
    ITAM-adjacent activities and capabilities
    • Tier 1 support/service desk
    • Deskside/field support
    • Tier 3 support
    • IT Procurement
    • Device management/managed IT services
    • Budget development
    • Applications development, maintenance
    • Infrastructure hosting (e.g. cloud or colocation)
    • Infrastructure management and support
    • Discovery/monitoring tools management and support

    2.2 Identify outsourcing opportunities

    1-2 hours

    Input: Understanding of current ITAM processes and challenges

    Output: Understanding of potential outsourcing opportunities

    Materials: The table in this slide, and insight in previous slides, Your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Participants: ITAM team, IT leaders and managers, ITAM business partners

    At a high level, discuss which functions of ITAM are good candidates for outsourcing.

    Start with the previous slide for examples of outsourcing activities or capabilities directly related to or adjacent to the ITAM practice. Categorize these activities as follows:

    Outsource Potentially Outsource Insource
    • Asset disposal/recycling
    • ELP report creation
    • ITAM process management

    Go through the list of activities to potentially or definitely outsource and confirm:

    1. Will outsourcing solve a resourcing need for an existing process, or can you deliver this adequately in-house?
    2. Will outsourcing improve the effectiveness and efficiency of current processes? Will it deliver more effective service channels or improved levels of reliability and performance consistency?
    3. Will outsourcing provide or enable enhanced service capabilities that your IT customers could use, and which you cannot deliver in-house due to lack of scale or capacity?

    Answering “no” to more than one of these questions suggests a need to further review options to ensure the goals are aligned with the potential value of the service offerings available.

    Add your results to your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Step 2.3: Centralize or decentralize ITAM capabilities

    Participants

    • Project sponsor and lead facilitator
    • ITAM team
    • IT leaders and managers
    • ITAM business partners

    Outcomes

    • Outline where the team(s) responsible for ITAM sit across the organization, who they report to, and who they need to work with across IT and the business.

    Align ITAM with IT’s structure

    ITAM’s structure will typically align with the larger business and IT structure. The wrong structure will undermine your ability to meet ITAM goals and lead to frustration, missed work, inefficiency, and loss of value.

    Which of the four archetypes below reflects the structure you need?

    1. Centralized — ITAM is entirely centralized in a single function, which reports into a central IT department.
    2. Decentralized — Local IT groups are responsible and accountable for ITAM. They may coordinate informally but do not report to any central team.
    3. Hybrid-Shared Services — Local IT can opt in to shared services but must follow centrally set ITAM practices to do so, usually with support from a shared ITAM function.
    4. Hybrid-Federated — Local IT departments are free to develop their own approach to ITAM outside of core, centrally set requirements.

    Centralized ITAM

    Total coordination, control, and oversight

    • ITAM accountability, policies, tools, standards, and expertise – in this model, they’re all concentrated in a single, specialized IT asset management practice. Accountability, authority, and oversight are concentrated in the central function as well.
    • A central ITAM team will benefit from knowledge sharing and task specialization opportunities. They are a visible single point of contact for ITAM-related questions
    • The central ITAM team will coordinate ITAM activities across the organization to optimize spend, manage risk, and enhance service. Any local IT teams are supported by and directly answerable to the central ITAM team for ITAM activities.
    • There is a single, centrally managed ITAM database. Wherever possible, this database should be integrated with other tools to support cross-solution automation (e.g. integrate AD to automatically reflect user identity changes in the ITAM database).
    • This model drives cross-organization coordination and oversight, but it may not be responsive to specific and nuanced local requirements.
    Example: Centralized
    Example of a Centralized ITAM.

    Solid line. Direct reporting relationship

    Dotted line. Dotted line working or reporting relationship

    Decentralized ITAM

    Maximize choice

    • ITAM accountability and oversight are entirely devolved to local or regional IT and/or ITAM organizations, which are free to set their own priorities, goals, policies, and standards. This model maximizes the authority of local groups to build practices that meet local requirements.
    • It may be challenging to resource and mature local practices. ITAM maturity will vary from one local organization to the next.
    • It is more likely that ITAM managers are a part-time role, and sometimes even a non-IT role. Local ITAM teams or coordinators may coordinate and share knowledge informally, but specialization can be challenging to build or leverage effectively across the organization.
    • There is likely no central ITAM tool. Local tools may be acquired, implemented, and integrated by local IT departments to suit their own needs, which can make it very difficult to report on assets organization-wide – for example, to establish compliance on an enterprise software contract.
    Example: Decentralized


    Example of a Decentralized ITAM.

    Solid line. Direct reporting relationship

    Dotted line. Dotted line working or reporting relationship

    Blue dotted line. Informal working relationships, knowledge sharing

    Hybrid: Federation

    Centralization with a light touch

    • A middle ground between centralized and decentralized ITAM, this model balances centralized decision making, specialization, and governance with local autonomy.
    • A central team will define organization-wide ITAM goals, develop capabilities, policies, and standards, and monitor compliance by local and central teams. All local teams must comply with centrally defined requirements, but they can also develop further capabilities to meet local goals.
    • For example, there will typically be a central ITAM database that must be used for at least a subset of assets, but other teams may build their own databases for day-to-day operations and export data to the central database as required.
    • There are often overlapping responsibilities in this model. A strong collaborative relationship between central and local ITAM teams is especially important here, particularly after major changes to requirements, processes, tools, or staffing when issues and breakdowns are more likely.
    Example: Federation


    Example of a Federation ITAM.

    Solid line. Direct reporting relationship

    Purple solid line. Oversight/governance

    Dotted line. Dotted line working or reporting relationship

    Hybrid: Shared Services

    Optional centralization

    • A special case of federated ITAM that balances central control and local autonomy, but with more power given to local IT to opt out of centralized shared services that come with centralized ITAM requirements.
    • ITAM requirements set by the shared services team will support management, allocation, and may have showback or chargeback implications. Following the ITAM requirements is a condition of service. If a local organization chooses to stop using shared services, they are (naturally) no longer required to adhere to the shared services ITAM requirements.
    • As with the federated model, local teams may develop further capabilities to meet local goals.
    Example: Shared Services


    Example of a Shared Services ITAM.

    Solid line. Direct reporting relationship

    Dotted line. Dotted line working relationship

    Blue dotted line. Informal working relationships, knowledge sharing

    Structure data collection & analysis

    Consider the implications of structure on data.

    Why centralize?
    • There is a need to build reports that aggregate data on assets organization-wide, rather than just assets within a local environment.
    • Decentralized ITAM tracking isn’t producing accurate or usable data, even for local purposes.
    • Tracking tools have overlapping functionality. There’s an opportunity to rationalize spend, management and support for ITAM tools.
    • Contract centralization can optimize spend and manage risks, but only with the data required to manage those contracts.
    Why decentralize?
    • Tracking and reporting on local assets is sufficient to meet ITAM goals; there is limited or no need to track assets organization-wide.
    • Local teams have the skills to track and maintain asset data; subsidiaries have appropriate budgets and tools to support ITAM tracking.
    • Decentralized ITSM/ITAM tools are in place, populated, and accurate.
    • The effort to consolidate tools and processes may outweigh the benefits to data centralization.
    • Lots of variability in types of assets and the environment is stable.
    Requirements for success:
    • A centralized IT asset management solution is implemented and managed.
    • Local teams must understand the why and how of centralized data tracking and be held accountable for assigned responsibilities.
    • The asset tool should offer both centralized and localized views of the data.
    Requirements for success:
    • Guidelines and expectations for reporting to centralized asset management team will be well defined and supported.
    • Local asset managers will have opportunity to collaborate with others in the role for knowledge transfer and asset trading, where appropriate.

    Structure budget and contract management

    Contract consolidation creates economies of scale for vendor management and license pooling that strengthen your negotiating position with vendors and optimize spend.

    Why centralize?
    • Budgeting, governance, and accountability are already centralized. Centralized ITAM practices can support the existing governance practices.
    • Centralizing contract management and negotiation can optimize spend and/or deliver access to better service.
    • Centralize management for contracts that cover most of the organization, are highly complex, involve large spend and/or higher risk, and will benefit from specialization of asset staff.
    Why decentralize?
    • Budgeting, governance, and accountability rest with local organizations.
    • There may be increased need for high levels of customer responsiveness and support.
    • Decentralize contract management for contracts used only by local groups (e.g. a few divisions, a few specialized functions), and that are smaller, low risk, and come with standard terms and conditions.
    Requirements for success:
    • A centralized IT asset management solution is implemented and managed.
    • Contract terms must be harmonized across the organization.
    • Centralized fulfillment is as streamlined as possible. For example, software contracts should include the right to install at any time and pay through a true-up process.
    Requirements for success:
    • Any expectations for harmonization with the centralized asset management team will be well defined and supported.
    • Local asset managers can collaborate with other local ITAM leads to support knowledge transfer, asset swapping, etc.

    Structure technology management

    Are there opportunities to centralize or decentralize support functions?

    Why centralize?
    • Standard technologies are deployed organization-wide.
    • There are opportunities to improve service and optimize costs by consolidating knowledge, service contracts, and support functions.
    • Centralizing data on product supply allows for easier harvest and redeployment of assets by a central support team.
    • A stable, central support function can better support localized needs during seasonal staffing changes, mergers and acquisitions.
    Why decentralize?
    • Technology is unique to a local subset of users or customers.
    • Minimal opportunity for savings or better support by consolidating knowledge, service contracts, or support functions.
    • Refresh standards are set at a local level; new tech adoption may be impeded by a reliance on older technologies, local budget shortfalls, or other constraints.
    • Hardware may need to be managed locally if shipping costs and times can’t reasonably be met by a distant central support team.
    Requirements for success:
    • Ensure required processes, technologies, skills, and knowledge are in place to enable centralized support.
    • Keep a central calendar of contract renewals, including reminders to start work on the renewal no less than 90 days prior. Prioritize contracts with high dollar value or high risk.
    • The central asset management solution should be configured to provide data that can enable the central support team.
    Requirements for success:
    • Ensure required processes, technologies, skills, and knowledge are in place to enable decentralized support.
    • Decentralized support teams must understand and adhere to ITAM activities that are part of support work (e.g. data entry, data audits).
    • The central asset management solution should be configured to provide data that can enable the central support team, or decentralized asset solutions must be funded, and teams trained on their use.

    2.3 Review ITAM Structure

    1-2 hours

    Input: Understanding of current organizational structure, Understanding of challenges and opportunities related to the current structure

    Output: A list of prioritized organizational goals, An initial assessment of how ITAM can support these goals

    Materials: The table in this slide, Your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Participants: ITAM team, IT leaders and managers, ITAM business partners

    Outline the current model for your organization and identify opportunities to centralize or decentralize ITAM-related activities.

    1. What model best describes how ITAM should be structured in your organization? Modify the slide outlining structure as a group to outline your own organization, as required.
    2. In the table below, outline opportunities to centralize or decentralize data tracking, budget and contract management, and technology management activities.
    Centralize Decentralize
    Data collection & analysis
    • Make better use of central ITAM database.
    • Support local IT departments building runbooks for data tracking during lifecycle activities (create templates, examples)
    Budget and contract management
    • Centralize Microsoft contracts.
    • Create a runbook to onboard new companies to MSFT contracts.
    • Create tools and data views to support local department budget exercises.
    Technology management
    • Ensure all end-user devices are visible to centrally managed InTune, ConfigMgr.
    • Enable direct shipping from vendor to local sites.
    • Establish disposal/pickup at local sites.

    Add your results to your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Step 2.4: Create a RACI

    Participants

    • Project sponsor and lead facilitator
    • ITAM team
    • IT leaders and managers
    • ITAM business partners

    Outcomes

    • Review the role of the IT asset manager.
    • Identify who’s responsible, accountable, consulted, and informed for key ITAM activities.

    Empower your asset manager

    The asset manager is the critical ITAM role. Ensure they’re positioned to succeed.

    There’s too much change in the technology and business environment to expect ITAM to be “a problem to solve.” It is a practice that requires care and feeding through regular iteration to achieve success. At the helm of this practice is your asset manager, whose approach and past experience will have a significant impact on how you approach ITAM.

    The asset manager role requires a variety of skills, knowledge, and abilities including:

    • Operations, process, and practice management.
    • An ability to communicate, influence, negotiate, and facilitate.
    • Organizational knowledge and relationship management.
    • Contract and license agreement analysis, attention to detail.
    • Natural curiosity and a willingness to learn.
    • A strong understanding of technologies in use by the organization, and how they fit into the asset management program.
    Where the asset manager sits in the organization will also have an impact on their focus and priorities. When the asset manager reports into a service team, their focus will often reflect their team’s focus: end-user devices and software, customer satisfaction, request fulfillment. Asset teams that report into a leadership or governance function will be more likely to focus on organization-wide assets, governance, budget management, and compliance.

    “Where your asset manager sits, and what past experience they have, is going to influence how they do asset management.” (Jeremy Boerger, Consultant & Author)

    “It can be annoying at times, but a good IT asset manager will poke their nose into activities that do not obviously concern them, such as programme and project approval boards and technical design committees. Their aim is to identify and mitigate ITAM risks BEFORE the technology is deployed as well as to ensure that projects and solutions ‘bake in’ the necessary processes and tools that ensure IT assets can be managed effectively throughout their lifecycle.” (Kylie Fowler, ITAM by Design, 2017)

    IT asset managers must have a range of skills and knowledge

    • ITAM Operations, Process, and Practice Management
      The asset manager is typically responsible for managing and improving the ITAM practice and related processes and tools. The asset manager may administer the ITAM tool, develop reports and dashboards, evaluate and implement new technologies or services to improve ITAM maturity, and more.
    • Organizational Knowledge
      An effective IT asset manager has a good understanding of your organization and its strategy, products, stakeholders, and culture.
    • Technology & Product Awareness
      An IT asset manager must learn about new and changing technologies and products adopted by the organization (e.g. IoT, cloud) and develop recommendations on how to track and manage them via the ITAM practice.
    A book surrounded by icons corresponding to the bullet points.
    • People Management
      Asset managers often manage a team directly and have dotted-line reports across IT and the business.
    • Communication
      Important in any role, but particularly critical where learning, listening, negotiation, and persuasion are so critical.
    • Finance & Budgeting
      A foundational knowledge of financial planning and budgeting practices is often helpful, where the asset manager is asked to contribute to these activities.
    • Contract Review & Analysis
      Analyze new and existing contracts to evaluate changes, identify compliance requirements, and optimize spend.

    Assign ITAM responsibilities and accountabilities

    Align authority and accountability.
    • A RACI exercise will help you discuss and document accountability and responsibility for critical ITAM activities.
    • When responsibility and accountability are not currently well documented, it’s often useful to invite a representative of the roles identified to participate in this alignment exercise. The discussion can uncover contrasting views on responsibility and governance, which can help you build a stronger management and governance model.
    • The RACI chart can help you identify who should be involved when making changes to a given activity. Clarify the variety of responsibilities assigned to each key role.
    • In the future, you may need to define roles in more detail as you change your hardware and software asset management procedures.

    R

    Responsible: The person who actually gets the job done.

    Different roles may be responsible for different aspects of the activity relevant to their role.

    A

    Accountable: The one role accountable for the activity (in terms completion, quality, cost, etc.)

    Must have sufficient authority to be held accountable; responsible roles are often accountable to this role.

    C

    Consulted: Must have the opportunity to provide meaningful input at certain points in the activity.

    Typically, subject matter experts or stakeholders. The more people you must consult, the more overhead and time you’ll add to a process.

    I

    Informed: Receives information regarding the task, but has no requirement to provide feedback.

    Information might relate to process execution, changes, or quality.

    2.4 Conduct a RACI Exercise

    1-2 hours

    Input: An understanding of key roles and activities in ITAM practices, An understanding of your organization, High-level structure of your ITAM program

    Output: A RACI diagram for IT asset management

    Materials: The table in the next slide, Your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Participants: ITAM team, IT leaders and managers, ITAM business partners

    Let’s face it – RACI exercises can be dry. We’ve found that the approach below is more collaborative, engaging, and effective compared to filling out the table as a large group.

    1. Create a shared working copy of the RACI charts on the following slides (e.g. write it out on a whiteboard or provide a link to this document and work directly in it).
    2. Review the list of template roles and activities as a group. Add, change, or remove roles and activities from the table as needed.
    3. Divide into small groups. Assign each group a set of roles, and have them define whether that role is accountable, responsible, consulted, or informed for each activity in the chart. Refer to the previous slide for context on RACI. Give everyone 15 minutes to update their section of the chart.
    4. Come back together as a large group to review the chart. First, check for accountability – there should generally be just one role accountable for each activity. Then, have each small group walk through their section, and encourage participants to ask questions. Is there at least one role responsible for each task, and what are they responsible for? Does everyone listed as consulted or informed really need to be? Make any necessary adjustments.

    Add your results to your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Define ITAM governance activities

    RACI Chart for ITAM governance activities. In the first column is a list of governance activities, and the row headers are positions within a company. Fields are marked with an R, A, C, or I.

    Document asset management responsibilities and accountabilities

    RACI Chart for ITAM asset management responsibilities and accountabilities. In the first column is a list of responsibilities and accountabilities, and the row headers are positions within a company. Fields are marked with an R, A, C, or I.

    Step 2.5: Align ITAM with other Service Management Practices

    Participants

    • Project sponsor and lead facilitator
    • ITAM team
    • IT leaders and managers

    Outcomes

    • Establish shared and separate responsibilities for asset and configuration management.
    • Identify how ITAM can support other practices, and how other practices can support ITAM.

    Asset vs. Configuration

    Asset and configuration management look at the same world through different lenses.
    • IT asset management tends to focus on each IT asset in its own right: assignment or ownership, its lifecycle, and related financial obligations and entitlements.
    • Configuration management is focused on configuration items (CIs) that must be managed to deliver a service and the relationships and integrations to other CIs.
    • ITAM and configuration management teams and practices should work closely together. Though asset and configuration management focus on different outcomes, they tend use overlapping tools and data sets. Each practice, when working effectively, can strengthen the other.
    • Many objects will exist in both the CMDB and AMDB, and the data on those shared objects will need to be kept in sync.
    Asset and Configuration Management: An Example

    Configuration Management Database (CMDB)

    A database of uniquely identified configuration items (CIs). Each CI record may include information on:
    Service Attributes

    Supported Service(s)
    Service Description, Criticality, SLAs
    Service Owners
    Data Criticality/Sensitivity

    CI Relationships

    Physical Connections
    Logical Connections
    Dependencies

    Arrow connector.

    Discovery, Normalization, Dependency Mapping, Business Rules*

    Manual Data Entry

    Arrow connector.
    This shared information could be attached to asset records, CI records, or both, and it should be synchronized between the two databases where it’s tracked in both.
    Hardware Information

    Serial, Model and Specs
    Network Address
    Physical Location

    Software Installations

    Hypervisor & OS
    Middleware & Software
    Software Configurations

    Arrow connector.

    Asset Management Database (AMDB)

    A database of uniquely identified IT assets. Each asset record may include information on:
    Procurement/Purchasing

    Purchase Request/Purchase Order
    Invoice and Cost
    Cost Center
    Vendor
    Contracts and MSAs
    Support/Maintenance/Warranties

    Asset Attributes

    Model, Title, Product Info, License Key
    Assigned User
    Lifecycle Status
    Last ITAM Audit Date
    Certificate of Disposal

    Arrows connecting multiple fields.

    IT Security Systems

    Vulnerability Management
    Threat Management
    SIEM
    Endpoint Protection

    IT Service Management (ITSM) System

    Change Tickets
    Request Tickets
    Incident Tickets
    Problem Tickets
    Project Tickets
    Knowledgebase

    Financial System/ERP

    General Ledger
    Accounts Payable
    Accounts Receivable
    Enterprise Assets
    Enterprise Contract Database

    (*Discovery, dependency mapping, and data normalization are often features or modules of configuration management, asset management, or IT service management tools.)

    2.5 Integrate ITAM and configuration practices

    45 minutes

    Input: Knowledge of the organization’s configuration management processes

    Output: Define how ITAM and configuration management will support one another

    Materials: The table in this slide, Your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Participants: ITAM team, IT leaders and managers, Configuration manager

    Work through the table below to identify how you will collaborate and synchronize data across ITAM and configuration management practices and tools.

    What are the goals (if any currently exist) for the configuration management practice? Connect configuration items to services to support service management.
    How will configuration and asset management teams collaborate? Weekly status updates. As-needed working sessions.
    Shared visibility on each others’ Kanban tracker.
    Create tickets to raise and track issues that require collaboration or attention from the other team.
    How can config leverage ITAM? Connect CIs to financial, contractual, and ownership data.
    How can ITAM leverage config? Connect assets to services, changes, incidents.
    What key fields will be primarily tracked/managed by ITAM? Serial number, unique ID, user, location, PO number, …
    What key fields will be primarily tracked/managed by configuration management? Supported service(s), dependencies, service description, service criticality, network address…

    Add your results to your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    ITAM supports service management

    Decoupling asset management from other service management practices can result in lost value. Establish how asset management can support other service management practices – and how those practices can support ITAM.

    Incident Management

    What broke?
    Was it under warranty?
    Is there a service contract?
    Was it licensed?
    Who was it assigned to?
    Is it end-of-life?

    ITAM
    Practice

    Request Management

    What can this user request or purchase?
    What are standard hardware and software offerings?
    What does the requester already have?
    Are there items in inventory to fulfil the request?
    Did we save money by reissuing equipment?
    Is this a standard request?
    What assets are being requested regularly?

    What IT assets are related to the known issue?
    What models and vendors are related to the issue?
    Are the assets covered by a service contract?
    Are other tickets related to this asset?
    What end-of-life assets have been tied to incidents recently?

    Problem Management

    What assets are related to the change?
    Is the software properly licensed?
    Has old equipment been properly retired and disposed?
    Have software licenses been returned to the pool?
    Is the vendor support on the change part of a service contract?

    Change Enablement

    2.5. Connect with other IT service practices

    45 minutes

    Input: Knowledge of existing organizational IT service management processes

    Output: Define how ITAM will help other service management processes, and how other service management processes will help ITAM

    Materials: The table in this slide, Your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Participants: ITAM team, IT leaders and managers, Service leads

    Complete the table below to establish what ITAM can provide to other service management practices, and what other practices can provide to ITAM.

    Practice ITAM will help Will help ITAM
    Incident Management Provide context on assets involved in an incident (e.g. ownership, service contracts). Track when assets are involved in incidents (via incident tickets).
    Request Management Oversee request & procurement processes. Help develop asset standards. Enter new assets in ITAM database.
    Problem Management Collect information on assets related to known issues. Report back on models/titles that are generating known issues.
    Change Enablement Provide context on assets for change review. Ensure EOL assets are retired and licenses are returned during changes.
    Capacity Management Identify ownership, location for assets at capacity. Identify upcoming refreshes or purchases.
    Availability Management Connect uptime and reliability to assets. Identify assets that are causing availability issues.
    Monitoring and Event Management Provide context to events with asset data. Notify asset of unrecognized software and hardware.
    Financial Management Establish current and predict future spending. Identify upcoming purchases, renewals.

    Add your results to your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Step 2.6: Evaluate ITAM tools and integrations

    Participants

    • Project sponsor and lead facilitator
    • ITAM team
    • IT leaders and managers

    Outcomes

    • Create a list of the ITAM tools currently in use, how they’re used, and their current limitations.
    • Identify new tools that could provide value to the ITAM practice, and what needs to be done to acquire and implement them.

    “Everything is connected. Nothing is also connected.” (Dirk Gently’s Holistic Detective Agency)

    Establish current strengths and gaps in your ITAM toolset

    ITAM data quality relies on tools and integrations that are managed by individuals or teams who don’t report directly to the ITAM function.

    Without direct line of sight into tools management, the ITAM team must influence rather than direct improvement initiatives that are in some cases critical to the performance of the ITAM function. To more effectively influence improvement efforts, you must explicitly identify what you need, why you need it, from which tools, and from which stakeholders.

    Data Sources
    Procurement Tools
    Discovery Tools
    Active Directory
    Purchase Documents
    Spreadsheets
    Input To Asset System(s) of Record
    ITAM Database
    ITSM Tool
    CMDB
    Output To Asset Data Consumption
    ITFM Tools
    Security Tools
    TEM Tools
    Accounting Tools
    Spreadsheets
    “Active Directory plays a huge role in audit defense and self-assessment, but no-one really goes out there and looks at Active Directory.

    I was talking to one organization that has 1,600,000 AD records for 100,000 employees.” (Mike Austin, Founder, MetrixData 360)

    2.6 Evaluate ITAM existing technologies

    30 minutes

    Input: Knowledge of existing ITAM tools

    Output: A list of prioritized organizational goals, An initial assessment of how ITAM can support these goals

    Materials: The table in this slide, Your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Participants: ITAM team, IT leaders and managers

    Identify the use, limitations, and next steps for existing ITAM tools, including those not directly managed by the ITAM team.

    1. What tools do we have today?
    2. What are they used for? What are their limitations?
    3. Who manages them?
    4. What actions could we take to maximize the value of the tools?
    Existing Tool Use Constraints Owner Proposed Action?
    ITAM Module
    • Track HW/SW
    • Connect assets to incident, request
    • Currently used for end-user devices only
    • Not all divisions have access
    • SAM capabilities are limited
    ITAM Team/Service Management
    • Add license for additional read/write access
    • Start tracking infra in this tool
    Active Directory
    • Store user IDs, organizational data
    Major data quality issues IT Operations
    • Work with AD team to identify issues creating data issues

    Add your results to your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    2.6 Identify potential new tools

    30 minutes

    Input: Knowledge of tooling gaps, An understanding of available tools that could remediate gaps

    Output: New tools that can improve ITAM capabilities, including expected value and proposed next steps

    Materials: The table in this slide, Your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Participants: ITAM team, IT leaders and managers

    Identify tools that are required to support the identified goals of the ITAM practice.

    1. What types of tools do we need that we don’t have?
    2. What could these tools help us do?
    3. What needs to be done next to investigate or acquire the appropriate tool?
    New Tool Expected Value Proposed Next Steps
    SAM tool
    • Automatically calculate licensing entitlements from contract data.
    • Automatically calculate licensing requirements from discovery data.
    • Support gap analyses.
    • Further develop software requirements.
    • Identify vendors in the space and create a shortlist.

    Add your results to your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Step 2.7: Create a plan for internal and external audits

    Participants

    • Project sponsor and lead facilitator
    • ITAM team
    • IT leaders and managers
    • ITAM business partners

    Outcomes

    • Establish your approach to internal data audits.
    • Create a high-level response plan for external audits.

    Validate ITAM data via internal audits

    Data audits provide assurance that the records in the ITAM database are as accurate as possible. Consider these three approaches:

    Compare Tool Records

    Audit your data by comparing records in the ITAM system to other discovery sources.

    • Ideally, use three separate data sources (e.g. ITAM database, discovery tool, security tool). Use a common field, such as the host name, to compare across fields. (To learn more about discovery tool analysis, see Jeremy Boerger’s book, Rethinking IT Asset Management.)
    • Run reports to compare records and identify discrepancies. This could include assets missing from one system or metadata differences such as different users or installed software.
    • Over time, discrepancies between tools should be well understood and accepted; otherwise, they should be addressed and remediated.
    IT-led Audit

    Conduct a hands-on investigation led by ITAM staff and IT technicians.

    • In-person audits require significant effort and resources. Each audit should be scoped and planned ahead of time to focus on known problem areas.
    • Provide the audit team with exact instructions on what needs to be verified and recorded. Depending on the experience and attention to detail of the audit team, you may need to conduct spot checks to ensure you’re catching any issues in the audit process itself.
    • Automation should be used wherever possible (e.g. through barcodes, scanners, and tables for quick access to ITAM records).
    User-led audit

    Have users validate the IT assets assigned to them.

    • Even more than IT-led audits: don’t use this approach too frequently; keep the scope as narrow as possible and the process as simple as possible.
    • Ensure users have all the information and tools they’ll need readily available to complete this task, or the result will be ineffective and will only frustrate your users.
    • Consider a process integrated with your ITSM tool: once a year, when a user logs in to the portal, they will be asked to enter the asset code for their laptop (and provided with instructions on where to find that code). Investigate discrepancies between assignments and ITAM records.

    2.7 Set an approach to internal data audits

    30 minutes

    Input: An understanding of current data audit capabilities and needs

    Output: An outline of how you’ll approach data audits, including frequency, scope, required resources

    Materials: Your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Participants: ITAM team

    Review the three internal data audit approaches outlined on the previous slide, and identify which of the three approaches you’ll use. For each approach, complete the fields in the table below.

    Audit Approach How often? What scope? Who’s involved? Comments
    Compare tool records Monthly Compare ITAM DB, Intune/ConfigMgr, and Vulnerability Scanner Data; focus on end-user devices to start Asset manager will lead at first.
    Work with tool admins to pull data and generate reports.
    IT-led audit Annual End-user devices at a subset of locations Asset manager will work with ITSM admins to generate reports. In-person audit to be conducted by local techs.
    User-led audit Annual Assigned personal devices (start with a pilot group) Asset coordinator to develop procedure with ITSM admin. Run pilot with power users first.

    Add your results to your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Prepare for and respond to external audits and true-ups

    Are you ready when software vendors come knocking?

    • Vendor audits are expensive.
    • If you’re out of compliance, you will at minimum be required to pay the missing license fees. At their discretion, vendors may choose to add punitive fees and require you to cover the hourly cost of their audit teams. If you choose not to pay, the vendor could secure an injunction to cut off your service, which in many cases will be far more costly than the fines. And this is aside from the intangible costs of the disruption to your business and damaged relationships between IT, ITAM, your business, and other partners.
    • Having a plan to respond to an audit is critical to reducing audit risk. Preparation will help you coordinate your audit response, ensure the audit happens on the most favorable possible terms, and even prevent some audits from happening in the first place.
    • The best defense, as they say, is a good offense. Good ITAM and SAM processes will allow you to track acquisition, allocation, and disposal of software licenses; understand your licensing position; and ensure you remain compliant whenever possible. The vendor has no reason to audit you when there’s nothing to find.
    • Know when and where your audit risk is greatest, so you can focus your resources where they can deliver the most value.
    “If software audits are a big part of your asset operations, you have problems. You can reduce the time spent on audits and eliminate some audits by having a proactive ITAM practice.” (Sandi Conrad, Principal Research Director)

    Info-Tech Insight

    Audit defense starts long before you get audited. For an in-depth review of your audit approach, see Info-Tech’s Prepare and Defend Against a Software Audit.

    Identify areas of higher audit risk

    Watch for these warning signs
    • Your organization is visibly fighting fires. Signs of disorder may signal to vendors that there are opportunities to exploit via an audit. Past audit failures make future audits more likely.
    • You are looking for ways to decrease spend. Vendors may counter attempts to true-down licensing by launching an audit to try to find unlicensed software that provides them leverage to negotiate maintained or even increased spending.
    • Your license/contract terms with the vendor are particularly complex or highly customized. Very complex terms may make it harder to validate your own compliance, which may present opportunities to the vendor in an audit.
    • The vendor has earned a reputation for being particularly aggressive with audits. Some vendors include audits as a standard component of their business model to drive revenue. This may include acquiring smaller vendors or software titles that may not have been audit-driven in the past, and running audits on their new customer base.

    “The reality is, software vendors prey on confusion and complication. Where there’s confusion, there’s opportunity.” (Mike Austin, Founder, MetrixData 360)

    Develop an audit response plan

    You will be on the clock once the vendor sends you an audit request. Have a plan ready to go.
    • Don’t panic: Resist knee-jerk reactions. Follow the plan.
    • Form an audit response team and centralize your response: This team should be led by a member of the ITAM group, and it should include IT leadership, software SMEs, representatives from affected business areas, vendor management, contract management, and legal. You may also need to bring on a contractor with deep expertise with the vendor in question to supplement your internal capabilities. Establish clearly who will be the point of contact with the vendor during the audit.
    • Clarify the scope of the audit: Clearly establish what the audit will cover – what products, subsidiaries, contracts, time periods, geographic regions, etc. Manage the auditors to prevent scope creep.
    • Establish who covers audit costs: Vendors may demand the auditee cover the hourly cost of their audit team if you’re significantly out of compliance. Consider asking the vendor to pay for your team’s time if you’re found to be compliant.
    • Know your contract: Vendors’ contracts change over time, and it’s no guarantee that even your vendor’s licensing experts will be aware of the rights you have in your contract. You must know your entitlements to negotiate effectively.
    1. Bring the audit request received to the attention of ITAM and IT leadership. Assemble the response team.
    2. Acknowledge receipt of audit notice.
    3. Negotiate timing and scope of the audit.
    4. Direct staff not to remove or acquire licenses for software under audit without directly involving the ITAM team first.
    5. Gather installation data and documentation to establish current entitlements, including original contract, current contract, addendums, receipts, invoices.
    6. Compare entitlements to installed software.
    7. Investigate any anomalies (e.g. unexpected or non-compliant software).
    8. Review results with the audit response team.

    2.7 Clarify your vendor audit response plan

    1 hour

    Input: Organizational knowledge on your current audit response procedures

    Output: Audit response team membership, High-level audit checklist, A list of things to start, stop, and continue doing as part of the audit response

    Materials: Your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Participants: ITAM team, IT leaders and managers, ITAM business partners

    1. Who’s on the audit response team, and what’s their role? Who will lead the team? Who will be the point of contact with the auditor?
    2. What are the high-level steps in our audit response workflow? Use the example checklist below as a starting point.
    3. What do we need to start, stop, and continue doing in response to audit requests?

    Example Audit Checklist

    • Bring the audit request received to the attention of ITAM and IT leadership. Assemble the response team.
    • Acknowledge receipt of audit notice.
    • Negotiate timing and scope of the audit.
    • Direct staff not to remove or acquire licenses for software under audit without directly involving the ITAM team first.
    • Gather installation data and documentation to establish current entitlements, including original contract, current contract, addendums, receipts, invoices.
    • Compare entitlements to installed software.
    • Investigate any anomalies (e.g. unexpected or non-compliant software).
    • Review results with the audit response team.

    Add your results to your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Step 2.8: Improve budget processes

    Participants

    • Project sponsor and lead facilitator
    • ITAM team
    • IT leaders and managers
    • ITAM business partners

    Outcomes

    • Identify what you need to start, stop, and continue to do to support budgeting processes.

    Improve budgeting and forecasting

    Insert ITAM into budgeting processes to deliver significant value.

    Some examples of what ITAM can bring to the budgeting table:
    • Trustworthy data on deployed assets and spending obligations tied to those assets.
    • Projections of hardware due for replacement in terms of quantity and spend.
    • Knowledge of IT hardware and software contract terms and pricing.
    • Lists of unused or underused hardware and software that could be redeployed to avoid spend.
    • Comparisons of spend year-over-year.

    Being part of the budgeting process positions ITAM for success in other ways:

    • Helps demonstrate the strategic value of the ITAM practice.
    • Provides insight into business and IT strategic projects and priorities for the year.
    • Strengthens relationships with key stakeholders, and positions the ITAM team as trusted partners.

    “Knowing what you have [IT assets] is foundational to budgeting, managing, and optimizing IT spend.” (Dave Kish, Info-Tech, Practice Lead, IT Financial Management)

    Stock image of a calculator.

    2.8 Build better budgets

    20 minutes

    Input: Context on IT budgeting processes

    Output: A list of things to start, stop, and continue doing as part of budgeting exercises

    Materials: The table in this slide, Your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Participants: ITAM team, IT leaders and managers, ITAM business partners

    What should we start, stop, and continue doing to support organizational budgeting exercises?

    Start Stop Continue
    • Creating buckets of spend and allocating assets to those buckets.
    • Zero-based review on IaaS instances quarterly.
    • Develop dashboards plugged into asset data for department heads to view allocated assets and spend.
    • Create value reports to demonstrate hard savings as well as cost avoidance.
    • Waiting for business leaders to come to us for help (start reaching out with reports proactively, three months before budget cycle).
    • % increases on IT budgets without further review.
    • Monthly variance budget analysis.
    • What-if analysis for asset spend based on expected headcount increases.

    Add your results to your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Step 2.9: Establish a documentation framework

    Participants

    • Project sponsor and lead facilitator
    • ITAM team

    Outcomes

    • Identify key documentation and gaps in your documentation.
    • Establish where documentation should be stored, who should own it, who should have access, and what should trigger a review.

    Create ITAM documentation

    ITAM documentation will typically support governance or operations.

    Long-term planning and governance
    • ITAM policy and/or related policies (procurement policy, security awareness policy, acceptable use policy, etc.)
    • ITAM strategy document
    • ITAM roadmap or burndown list
    • Job descriptions
    • Functional requirements documents for ITAM tools

    Operational documentation

    • ITAM SOPs (hardware, software) and workflows
    • Detailed work instructions/knowledgebase articles
    • ITAM data/records
    • Contracts, purchase orders, invoices, MSAs, SOWs, etc.
    • Effective Licensing Position (ELP) reports
    • Training and communication materials
    • Tool and integration documentation
    • Asset management governance, operations, and tools typically generate a lot of documentation.
    • Don’t create documentation for the sake of documentation. Prioritize building and maintaining documentation that addresses major risks or presents opportunities to improve the consistency and reliability of key processes.
    • Maximize the value of ITAM documentation by ensuring it is as current, accessible, and usable as it needs to be.
    • Clearly identify where documentation is stored and who should have access to it.
    • Identify who is accountable for the creation and maintenance of key documentation, and establish triggers for reviews, updates, and changes.

    Consider ITAM policies

    Create policies that can and will be monitored and enforced.
    • Certain requirements of the ITAM practice may need to be backed up by corporate policies: formal statements of organizational expectations that must be recognized by staff, and which will lead to sanctions/penalties if breached.
    • Some organizations will choose to create one or more ITAM-specific policies. Others will include ITAM-related statements in other existing policies, such as acceptable use policies, security training and awareness policies, procurement policies, configuration policies, e-waste policies, and more.
    • Ensure that you are prepared to monitor compliance with policies and evenly enforce breaches of policy. Failing to consistently enforce your policies exposes you and your organization to claims of negligence or discriminatory conduct.
    • For a template for ITAM-specific policies, see Info-Tech’s policy templates for Hardware Asset Management and Software Asset Management.

    2.9 Establish documentation gaps

    15-30 minutes

    Input: An understanding of existing documentation gaps and risks

    Output: Documentation gaps, Identified owners, repositories, access rights, and review/update protocols

    Materials: The table in this slide, Your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Participants: ITAM team, Optional: IT managers, ITAM business partners

    Discuss and record the following:

    • What planning/governance, operational, and tooling documentation do we still need to create? Who is accountable for the creation and maintenance of these documents?
    • Where will the documentation be stored? Who can access these documents?
    • What will trigger reviews or changes to the documents?
    Need to Create Owner Stored in Accessible by Trigger for review
    Hardware asset management SOP ITAM manager ITAM SharePoint site › Operating procedures folder
    • All IT staff
    • Annual review
    • As-needed for major tooling changes that require a documentation update

    Add your results to your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Step 2.10: Create a roadmap and communication plan

    Participants

    • Project sponsor and lead facilitator
    • ITAM team
    • IT leaders and managers

    Outcomes

    • A timeline of key ITAM initiatives.
    • Improvement ideas aligned to key initiatives.
    • A communication plan tailored to key stakeholders.
    • Your ITAM Strategy document.

    “Understand that this is a journey. This is not a 90-day project. And in some organizations, these journeys could be three or five years long.” (Mike Austin, MetrixData 360)

    2.10 Identify key ITAM initiatives

    30-45 minutes

    Input: Organizational strategy documents

    Output: A roadmap that outlines next steps

    Materials: The table in this slide, Your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Participants: ITAM team, IT leaders and managers, Project sponsor

    1. Identify key initiatives that are critical to improving practice maturity and meeting business goals.
    2. There should only be a handful of really key initiatives. This is the work that will have the greatest impact on your ability to deliver value. Too many initiatives muddy the narrative and can distract from what really matters.
    3. Plot the target start and end dates for each initiative in the business and IT transformation timeline you created in Phase 1.
    4. Review the chart and consider – what new capabilities should the ITAM practice have once the identified initiatives are complete? What transformational initiatives will you be better positioned to support?

    Add your results to your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Transformation Timeline

    Example transformation timeline with row headers 'Business Inititiaves', 'IT Initiatives', and 'ITAM Initiatives'. Each initiative is laid out along the timeline appropriately.

    2.10 Align improvement ideas to initiatives

    45 minutes

    Input: Key initiatives, Ideas for ITAM improvement collected over the course of previous exercises

    Output: Concrete action items to support each initiative

    Materials: The table in the next slide, Your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Participants: ITAM team, IT leaders and managers, Project sponsor

    As you’ve been working through the previous exercises, you have been tracking ideas for improvement – now we’ll align them to your roadmap.

    1. Review the list of ideas for improvement you’ve produced over the working sessions. Consolidate the list – are there any ideas that overlap or complement each other? Record any new ideas. Frame each idea as an action item – something you can actually do.
    2. Connect the action items to initiatives. It may be that not every action item becomes part of a key initiative. (Don’t lose ideas that aren’t part of key initiatives – track them in a separate burndown list or backlog.)
    3. Identify a target completion date and owner for each action item that’s part of an initiative.

    Add your results to your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Example ITAM initiatives

    Initiative 1: Develop hardware/software standards
    Task Target Completion Owner
    Laptop standards Q1-2023 ITAM manager
    Identify/eliminate contracts for unused software using scan tool Q2-2023 ITAM manager
    Review O365 license levels and standard service Q3-2023 ITAM manager

    Initiative 2: Improve ITAM data quality
    Task Target Completion Owner
    Implement scan agent on all field laptops Q3-2023 Desktop engineer
    Conduct in person audit on identified data discrepancies Q1-2024 ITAM team
    Develop and run user-led audit Q1-2024 Asset manager

    Initiative 3: Acquire & implement a new ITAM tool
    Task Target Completion Owner
    Select an ITAM tool Q3-2023 ITAM manager
    Implement ITAM tool, incl. existing data migration Q1-2024 ITAM manager
    Training on new tool Q1-2024 ITAM manager
    Build KPIs, executive dashboards in new tool Q2-2024 Data analyst
    Develop user-led audit functionality in new tool Q3-2024 ITAM coordinator

    2.10 Create a communication plan

    45 minutes

    Input: Proposed ITAM initiatives, Stakeholder priorities and goals, and an understanding of how ITAM can help them meet those goals

    Output: A high-level communication plan to communicate the benefits and impact of proposed changes to the ITAM program

    Materials: The table in this slide, Your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Participants: IT asset manager, Project sponsor

    Develop clear, consistent, and targeted messages to key ITAM stakeholders.

    1. Modify the list of stakeholders in the first column.
    2. What benefits should those stakeholders realize from ITAM? What impact may the proposed improvements have on them? Refer back to exercises from Phase 1, where you identified key stakeholders, their priorities, and how ITAM could help them.
    3. Identify communication channels (in-person, email, all-hands meeting, etc.) and timing – when you’ll distribute the message. You may choose to use more than one channel, and you may need to convey the message more than once.
    Group ITAM Benefits Impact Channel(s) Timing
    CFO
    • More accurate IT spend predictions
    • Better equipment utilization and value for money
    • Sponsor integration project between ITAM DB and financial system
    • Support procurement procedures review
    Face-to-face – based on their availability Within the next month
    CIO
    • Better oversight into IT spend
    • Data to help demonstrate IT value
    • Resources required to support tool and ITAM process improvements
    Standing bi-monthly 1:1 meetings Review strategy at next meeting
    IT Managers
    Field Techs

    Add your results to your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    2.10 Put the final touches on your ITAM Strategy

    30 minutes

    Input: Proposed ITAM initiatives, Stakeholder priorities and goals, and an understanding of how ITAM can help them meet those goals

    Output: A high-level communication plan to communicate the benefits and impact of proposed changes to the ITAM program

    Materials: The table in this slide, Your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Participants: IT asset manager, Project sponsor

    You’re almost done! Do a final check of your work before you send a copy to your participants.

    1. Summarize in three points the key findings from the activities you’ve worked through. What have you learned? What are your priorities? What key message do you need to get across? Add these to the appropriate slide near the start of the ITAM Strategy Template.
    2. What are your immediate next steps? Summarize no more than five and add them to the appropriate slide near the start of the ITAM Strategy Template.
      1. Are you asking for something? Approval for ITAM initiatives? Funding? Resources? Clearly identify the ask as part of your next steps.
    3. Are the KPIs identified in Phase 1 still valid? Will they help you monitor for success in the initiatives you’ve identified in Phase 2? Make any adjustments you think are required to the KPIs to reflect the additional completed work.

    Add your results to your copy of the ITAM Strategy Template

    Research Contributors and Experts

    Kylie Fowler
    Principal Consultant
    ITAM Intelligence

    Kylie is an experienced ITAM/FinOps consultant with a track record of creating superior IT asset management frameworks that enable large companies to optimize IT costs while maintaining governance and control.

    She has operated as an independent consultant since 2009, enabling organizations including Sainsbury's and DirectLine Insurance to leverage the benefits of IT asset management and FinOps to achieve critical business objectives. Recent key projects include defining an end-to-end SAM strategy, target operating model, policies and processes which when implemented provided a 300% ROI.

    She is passionate about supporting businesses of all sizes to drive continuous improvement, reduce risk, and achieve return on investment through the development of creative asset management and FinOps solutions.

    Rory Canavan
    Owner and Principal Consultant
    SAM Charter

    Rory is the founder, owner, and principal consultant of SAM Charter, an internationally recognized consultancy in enterprise-wide Software & IT Asset Management. As an industry leader, SAM Charter is uniquely poised to ensure your IT & SAM systems are aligned to your business requirements.

    With a technical background in business and systems analysis, Rory has a wide range of first-hand experience advising numerous companies and organizations on the best practices and principles pertaining to software asset management. This experience has been gained in both military and civil organizations, including the Royal Navy, Compaq, HP, the Federation Against Software Theft (FAST), and several software vendors.

    Research Contributors and Experts

    Jeremy Boerger
    Founder, Boerger Consulting
    Author of Rethinking IT Asset Management

    Jeremy started his career in ITAM fighting the Y2K bug at the turn of the 21st century. Since then, he has helped companies in manufacturing, healthcare, banking, and service industries build and rehabilitate hardware and software asset management practices.

    These experiences prompted him to create the Pragmatic ITAM method, which directly addresses and permanently resolves the fundamental flaws in current ITAM and SAM implementations.

    In 2016, he founded Boerger Consulting, LLC to help business leaders and decision makers fully realize the promises a properly functioning ITAM can deliver. In his off time, you will find him in Cincinnati, Ohio, with his wife and family.

    Mike Austin
    Founder and CEO
    MetrixData 360

    Mike Austin leads the delivery team at MetrixData 360. Mike brings more than 15 years of Microsoft licensing experience to his clients’ projects. He assists companies, from Fortune 500 to organizations with as few as 500 employees, with negotiations of Microsoft Enterprise Agreements (EA), Premier Support Contracts, and Select Agreements. In addition to helping negotiate contracts, he helps clients build and implement software asset management processes.

    Previously, Mike was employed by Microsoft for more than 8 years as a member of the global sales team. With Microsoft, Mike successfully negotiated more than a billion dollars in new and renewal EAs. Mike has also negotiated legal terms and conditions for all software agreements, developed Microsoft’s best practices for global account management, and was awarded Microsoft’s Gold Star Award in 2003 and Circle of Excellence in 2008 for his contributions.

    Bibliography

    “Asset Management.” SFIA v8. Accessed 17 March 2022.

    Boerger, Jeremy. Rethinking IT Asset Management. Business Expert Press, 2021.

    Canavan, Rory. “C-Suite Cheat Sheet.” SAM Charter, 2021. Accessed 17 March 2022.

    Fisher, Matt. “Metrics to Measure SAM Success.” Snow Software, 26 May 2015. Accessed 17 March 2022.

    Flexera (2021). “State of ITAM Report.” Flexera, 2021. Accessed 17 March 2022.

    Fowler, Kylie. “ITAM by design.” BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT, 2017. Accessed 17 March 2022.

    Fowler, Kylie. “Ch-ch-ch-changes… Is It Time for an ITAM Transformation?” ITAM Intelligence, 2021. Web. Accessed 17 March 2022.

    Fowler, Kylie. “Do you really need an ITAM policy?” ITAM Accelerate, 15 Oct. 2021. Accessed 17 March 2022.

    Hayes, Chris. “How to establish a successful, long-term ITAM program.” Anglepoint, Sept. 2021. Accessed 17 March 2022.

    ISO/IEC 19770-1-2017. IT Asset Management Systems – Requirements. Third edition. ISO, Dec 2017.

    Joret, Stephane. “IT Asset Management: ITIL® 4 Practice Guide”. Axelos, 2020.

    Jouravlev, Roman. “IT Service Financial Management: ITIL® 4 Practice Guide”. Axelos, 2020.

    Pagnozzi, Maurice, Edwin Davis, Sam Raco. “ITAM Vs. ITSM: Why They Should Be Separate.” KPMG, 2020. Accessed 17 March 2022.

    Rumelt, Richard. Good Strategy, Bad Strategy. Profile Books, 2013.

    Stone, Michael et al. “NIST SP 1800-5 IT Asset Management.” Sept, 2018. Accessed 17 March 2022.

    Enterprise Network Design Considerations

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}502|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Network Management
    • Parent Category Link: /network-management

    Security, risk, and trust models play into how networks are designed and deployed. If these models are not considered during network design, band-aids and workarounds will be deployed to achieve the needed goals, potentially bypassing network controls.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    The cloud “gold rush” has made it attractive for many enterprises to migrate services off the traditional network and into the cloud. These services are now outside of the traditional network and associated controls. This shifts the split of east-west vs. north-south traffic patterns, as well as extending the network to encompass services outside of enterprise IT’s locus of control.

    Impact and Result

    Where users access enterprise data or services and from which devices dictate the connectivity needed. With the increasing shift of work that the business is completing remotely, not all devices and data paths will be under the control of IT. This shift does not allow IT to abdicate from the responsibility to provide a secure network.

    Enterprise Network Design Considerations Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Enterprise Network Design Considerations Deck – A brief deck that outlines key trusts and archetypes when considering enterprise network designs.

    This blueprint will help you:

    • Enterprise Network Design Considerations Storyboard

    2. Enterprise Network Roadmap Technology Assessment Tool – Build an infrastructure assessment in an hour.

    Dispense with detailed analysis and customizations to present a quick snapshot of the road ahead.

    • Enterprise Network Roadmap Technology Assessment Tool
    [infographic]

    Further reading

    Enterprise Network Design Considerations

    It is not just about connectivity.

    Executive Summary

    Info-Tech Insight

    Connectivity and security are tightly coupled

    Security, risk, and trust models play into how networks are designed and deployed. If these models are not considered during network design, band-aids and workarounds will be deployed to achieve the needed goals, potentially bypassing network controls.

    Many services are no longer within the network

    The cloud “gold rush” has made it attractive for many enterprises to migrate services off the traditional network and into the cloud. These services are now outside of the traditional network and associated controls. This shifts the split of east-west vs. north-south traffic patterns, as well as extending the network to encompass services outside of enterprise IT’s locus of control.

    Users are demanding an anywhere, any device access model

    Where users access enterprise data or services and from which devices dictate the connectivity needed. With the increasing shift of work that the business is completing remotely, not all devices and data paths will be under the control of IT. This shift does not allow IT to abdicate from the responsibility to provide a secure network.

    Enterprise networks are changing

    The new network reality

    The enterprise network of 2020 and beyond is changing:

    • Services are becoming more distributed.
    • The number of services provided “off network” is growing.
    • Users are more often remote.
    • Security threats are rapidly escalating.

    The above statements are all accurate for enterprise networks, though each potentially to differing levels depending on the business being supported by the network. Depending on how affected the network in question currently is and will be in the near future, there are different common network archetypes that are best able to address these concerns while delivering business value at an appropriate price point.

    High-Level Design Considerations

    1. Understand Business Needs
    2. Understand what the business needs are and where users and resources are located.

    3. Define Your Trust Model
    4. Trust is a spectrum and tied tightly to security.

    5. Align With an Archetype
    6. How will the network be deployed?

    7. Understand Available Tooling
    8. What tools are in the market to help achieve design principles?

    Understand business needs

    Mission

    Never ignore the basics. Start with revisiting the mission and vision of the business to address relevant needs.

    Users

    Identify where users will be accessing services from. Remote vs. “on net” is a design consideration now more than ever.

    Resources

    Identify required resources and their locations, on net vs. cloud.

    Controls

    Identify required controls in order to define control points and solutions.

    Define a trust model

    Trust is a spectrum

    • There is a spectrum of trust, from fully trusted to not trusted at all. Each organization must decide for their network (or each area thereof) the appropriate level of trust to assign.
    • The ease of network design and deployment is directly proportional to the trust spectrum.
    • When resources and users are outside of direct IT control, the level of appropriate trust should be examined closely.

    Implicit

    Trust everything within the network. Security is perimeter based and designed to stop external actors from entering the large trusted zone.

    Controlled

    Multiple zones of trust within the network. Segmentation is a standard practice to separate areas of higher and lower trust.

    Zero

    Verify trust. The network is set up to recognize and support the principle of least privilege where only required access is supported.

    Align with an archetype

    Archetypes are a good guide

    • Using a defined archetype as a guiding principle in network design can help clarify appropriate tools or network structures.
    • Different aspects of a network can have different archetypes where appropriate (e.g. IT vs. OT [operational technology] networks).

    Traditional

    Services are provided from within the traditional network boundaries and security is provided at the network edge.

    Hybrid

    Services are provided both externally and from within the traditional network boundaries, and security is primarily at the network edge.

    Inverted

    Services are provided primarily externally, and security is cloud centric.

    Traditional networks

    Resources within network boundaries

    Moat and castle security perimeter

    Abstract

    A traditional network is one in which there are clear boundaries defined by a security perimeter. Trust can be applied within the network boundaries as appropriate, and traffic is generally routed through internally deployed control points that may be centralized. Traditional networks commonly include large firewalls and other “big iron” security and control devices.

    Network Design Tenets

    • The full network path from resource to user is designed, deployed, and controlled by IT.
    • Users external to the network must first connect to the network to gain access to resources.
    • Security, risk, and trust controls will be implemented by internal enterprise hardware/software devices.

    Control

    In the traditional network, it is assumed that all required control points can be adequately deployed across hardware/software that is “on prem” and under the control of central IT.

    Info-Tech Insight

    With increased cloud services provided to end users, this network is now more commonly used in data centers or OT networks.

    Traditional networks

    The image contains an example of what traditional networks look like, as described in the text below.

    Defining Characteristics

    • Traffic flows in a defined path under the control of IT to and from central IT resources.
    • Due to visibility into, and the control of, the traffic between the end user and resources, IT can relatively simply implement the required security controls on owned hardware.

    Common Components

    • Traditional offices
    • Remote users/road warriors
    • Private data center/colocation space

    Hybrid networks

    Resources internal and external to network

    Network security perimeter combined with cloud protection

    Abstract

    A hybrid network is one that combines elements of a traditional network with cloud resources. As some of these resources are not fully under the control of IT and may be completely “offnet” or loosely coupled to the on-premises network, the security boundaries and control points are less likely to be centralized. Hybrid networks allow the flexibility and speed of cloud deployment without leaving behind traditional network constructs. This generally makes them expensive to secure and maintain.

    Network Design Tenets

    • The network path from resource to user may not be in IT’s locus of control.
    • Users external to the network must first connect to the network to gain access to internal resources but may directly access publicly hosted ones.
    • Security, risk, and trust controls may potentially be implemented by a mixture of internal enterprise hardware/software devices and external control points.

    Control

    The hallmark of a hybrid network is the blending of public and private resources. This blending tends to necessitate both public and private points of control that may not be homogenous.

    Info-Tech Insight

    With multiple control points to address, take care in simplifying designs while addressing all concerns to ease operational load.

    Hybrid networks

    The image contains an example of what hybrid networks look like, as described in the text below.

    Defining Characteristics

    • Traffic flows to central resources across a defined path under the control of IT.
    • Traffic to cloud assets may be partially under the control of IT.
    • For central resources, the traffic to and from the end user can have the required security controls relatively simply implemented on owned hardware.
    • For public cloud assets, IT may or may not have some control over part of the path.

    Common Components

    • Traditional offices
    • Remote users/road warriors
    • Private data center/colocation space
    • Public cloud assets (IaaS/PaaS/SaaS)

    Inverted perimeter

    Resources primarily external to the network

    Security control points are cloud centric

    Abstract

    An inverted perimeter network is one in which security and control points cover the entire workflow, on or off net, from the consumer of services through to the services themselves with zero trust. Since the control plane is designed to encompass the workflow in a secure manner, much of the underlying connectivity can be abstracted. In an extreme version of this deployment, IT would abstract end-user access, and any cloud-based or on-premises resources would be securely published through the control plane with context-aware precision access.

    Network Design Tenets

    • The network path from resource to user is abstracted and controlled by IT through services like secure access service edge (SASE).
    • Users only need internet access and appropriate credentials to gain access to resources.
    • Security, risk, and trust controls will be implemented through external cloud based services.

    Control

    An inverted network abstracts the lower-layer connectivity away and focuses on implementing a cloud-based zero trust control plane.

    Info-Tech Insight

    This model is extremely attractive for organizations that consume primarily cloud services and have a large remote work force.

    Inverted networks

    The image contains an example of what inverted networks look like, as described in the text below.

    Defining Characteristics

    • The end user does not have to be in a defined location.
    • All central resources that are to be accessed are hosted on cloud resources.
    • IT has little to no control of the path between the end user and central resources.

    Common Components

    • Traditional offices
    • Regent offices/shared workspaces
    • Remote users/road warriors
    • Public cloud assets (IaaS/PaaS/SaaS)

    Understand available tooling

    Don’t buy a hammer and go looking for nails

    • A network archetype must be defined in order to understand what tools (hardware or software) are appropriate for consideration in a network build or refresh.
    • Tools are purpose built and generally designed to solve specific problems if implemented and operated correctly. Choose the tools to align with the challenges that you are solving as opposed to choosing tools and then trying to use those purchases to overcome challenges.
    • The purchase of a tool does not allow for abdication of proper design. Tools must be chosen appropriately and integrated properly to orchestrate the best solutions. Purchasing a tool and expecting the tool to solve all your issues rarely succeeds.

    “It is essential to have good tools, but it is also essential that the tools should be used in the right way.” — Wallace D. Wattles

    Software-defined WAN (SD-WAN)

    Simplified branch office connectivity

    Archetype Value: Traditional Networks

    What It Is Not

    SD-WAN is generally not a way to slash spending by lowering WAN circuit costs. Though it is traditionally deployed across lower cost access, to minimize risk and realize the most benefits from the platform many organizations install multiple circuits with greater bandwidths at each endpoint when replacing the more costly traditional circuits. Though this maximizes the value of the technology investment, it will result in the end cost being similar to the traditional cost plus or minus a small percentage.

    What It Is

    SD-WAN is a subset of software-defined networking (SDN) designed specifically to deploy a secure, centrally managed, connectivity agnostic, overlay network connecting multiple office locations. This technology can be used to replace, work in concert with, or augment more traditional costly connectivity such as MPLS or private point to point (PtP) circuits. In addition to the secure overlay, SD-WAN usually also enables policy-based, intelligent controls, based on traffic and circuit intelligence.

    Why Use It

    You have multiple endpoint locations connected by expensive lower bandwidth traditional circuits. Your target is to increase visibility and control while controlling costs if and where possible. Ease of centralized management and the ability to more rapidly turn up new locations are attractive.

    Cloud access security broker (CASB)

    Inline policy enforcement placed between users and cloud services

    Archetype Value: Hybrid Networks

    What It Is Not

    CASBs do not provide network protection; they are designed to provide compliance and enforcement of rules. Though CASBs are designed to give visibility and control into cloud traffic, they have limits to the data that they generally ingest and utilize. A CASB does not gather or report on cloud usage details, licencing information, financial costing, or whether the cloud resource usage is aligned with the deployment purpose.

    What It Is

    A CASB is designed to establish security controls beyond a company’s environment. It is commonly deployed to augment traditional solutions to extend visibility and control into the cloud. To protect assets in the cloud, CASBs are designed to provide central policy control and apply services primarily in the areas of visibility, data security, threat protection, and compliance.

    Why Use It

    You a mixture of on-premises and cloud assets. In moving assets out to the cloud, you have lost the traditional controls that were implemented in the data center. You now need to have visibility and apply controls to the usage of these cloud assets.

    Secure access service edge (SASE)

    Convergence of security and service access in the cloud

    Archetype Value: Inverted Networks

    What It Is Not

    Though the service will consist of many service offerings, SASE is not multiple services strung together. To present the value proposed by this platform, all functionality proposed must be provided by a single platform under a “single pane of glass.” SASE is not a mature and well-established service. The market is still solidifying, and the full-service definition remains somewhat fluid.

    What It Is

    SASE exists at the intersection of network-as-a-service and network-security-as-a-service. It is a superset of many network and security cloud offerings such as CASB, secure web gateway, SD-WAN, and WAN optimization. Any services offered by a SASE provider will be cloud hosted, presented in a single stack, and controlled through a single pane of glass.

    Why Use It

    Your network is inverting, and services are provided primarily as cloud assets. In a full realization of this deployment’s value, you would abstract how and where users gain initial network access yet remain in control of the communications and data flow.

    Activity

    Understand your enterprise network options

    Activity: Network assessment in an hour

    • Learn about the Enterprise Network Roadmap Technology Assessment Tool
    • Complete the Enterprise Network Roadmap Technology Assessment Tool

    This activity involves the following participants:

    • IT strategic direction decision makers.
    • IT managers responsible for network.
    • Organizations evaluating platforms for mission critical applications.

    Outcomes of this step:

    • Completed Enterprise Network Roadmap Technology Assessment Tool

    Info-Tech Insight

    Review your design options with security and compliance in mind. Infrastructure is no longer a standalone entity and now tightly integrates with software-defined networks and security solutions.

    Build an assessment in an hour

    Learn about the Enterprise Network Roadmap Technology Assessment Tool.

    This workbook provides a high-level analysis of a technology’s readiness for adoption based on your organization’s needs.

    • The workbook then places the technology on a graph that measures both the readiness and fit for your organization. In addition, it provides warnings for specific issues and lets you know if you have considerable uncertainty in your answers.
    • At a glance you can now communicate what you are doing to help the company:
      • Grow
      • Save money
      • Reduce risk
    • Regardless of your specific audience, these are important stories to be able to tell.
    The image contains three screenshots from the Enterprise Network Roadmap Technology Assessment Tool.

    Build an assessment in an hour

    Complete the Enterprise Network Roadmap Technology Assessment Tool.

    Dispense with detailed analysis and customizations to present a quick snapshot of the road ahead.

    1. Weightings: Adjust the Weighting tab to meet organizational needs. The provided weightings for the overall solution areas are based on a generic firm; individual firms will have different needs.
    2. Data Entry: For each category, answer the questions for the technology you are considering. When you have completed the questionnaire, go to the next tab for the results.
    3. Results: The Enterprise Network Roadmap Technology Assessment Tool provides a value versus readiness assessment of your chosen technology customized to your organization.

    The image contains three screenshots from the Enterprise Network Roadmap Technology Assessment Tool. It has a screenshot for each step as described in the text above.

    Related Info-Tech Research

    Effectively Acquire Infrastructure Services

    Acquiring a service is like buying an experience. Don’t confuse the simplicity of buying hardware with buying an experience.

    Outsource IT Infrastructure to Improve System Availability, Reliability, and Recovery

    There are very few IT infrastructure components you should be housing internally – outsource everything else.

    Build Your Infrastructure Roadmap

    Move beyond alignment: Put yourself in the driver’s seat for true business value.

    Drive Successful Sourcing Outcomes With a Robust RFP Process

    Leverage your vendor sourcing process to get better results.

    Research Authors

    The image contains a photo of Scott Young.

    Scott Young, Principal Research Advisor, Info-Tech Research Group

    Scott Young is a Director of Infrastructure Research at Info-Tech Research Group. Scott has worked in the technology field for over 17 years, with a strong focus on telecommunications and enterprise infrastructure architecture. He brings extensive practical experience in these areas of specialization, including IP networks, server hardware and OS, storage, and virtualization.

    The image contains a photo of Troy Cheeseman.

    Troy Cheeseman, Practice Lead, Info-Tech Research Group

    Troy has over 24 years of experience and has championed large enterprise-wide technology transformation programs, remote/home office collaboration and remote work strategies, BCP, IT DRP, IT operations and expense management programs, international right placement initiatives, and large technology transformation initiatives (M&A). Additionally, he has deep experience working with IT solution providers and technology (cloud) startups.

    Bibliography

    Ahlgren, Bengt. “Design considerations for a network of information.” ACM Digital Library, 21 Dec. 2008.

    Cox Business. “Digital transformation is here. Is your business ready to upgrade your mobile work equation?” BizJournals, 1 April 2022. Accessed April 2022.

    Elmore, Ed. “Benefits of integrating security and networking with SASE.” Tech Radar, 1 April 2022. Web.

    Greenfield, Dave. “From SD-WAN to SASE: How the WAN Evolution is Progressing.” Cato Networks, 19 May 2020. Web

    Korolov, Maria. “What is SASE? A cloud service that marries SD-WAN with security.” Network World, 7 Sept. 2020. Web.

    Korzeniowski, Paul, “CASB tools evolve to meet broader set of cloud security needs.” TechTarget, 26 July 2019. Accessed March 2022.

    Define Your Digital Business Strategy

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}55|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $83,641 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 26 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Innovation
    • Parent Category Link: /innovation
    • Your organizational digital business strategy sits on the shelf because it fails to guide implementation.
    • Your organization has difficulty adapting new technologies or rethinking their existing business models.
    • Your organization lacks a clear vision for the digital customer journey.
    • Your management team lacks a framework to rethink how your organization delivers value today, which causes annual planning to become an ideation session that lacks focus.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Pre-pandemic digital strategies have been primarily focused on automation. However, your post-pandemic digital strategy must focus on driving resilience for growth opportunities.

    Impact and Result

    • Design a strategy that applies innovation to your business model, streamline and transform processes, and make use of technologies to enhance interactions with customers and employees.
    • Use digital for transforming non-routine cognitive activities and for derisking key elements of the value chain.
    • Create a balanced roadmap that improves digital maturity and prepares you for long-term success in a digital economy.

    Define Your Digital Business Strategy Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Digital Business Strategy Deck – A step-by-step document that walks you through how to identify top value chains and a digitally enabled growth opportunity, transform stakeholder journeys, and build a digital transformation roadmap.

    This blueprint guides you through a value-driven approach to digital transformation that allows you to identify what aspects of the business to transform, what technologies to embrace, what processes to automate, and what new business models to create. This approach to digital transformation unifies digital possibilities with your customer experiences.

    • Define Your Digital Business Strategy – Phases 1-4

    2. Digital Business Strategy Workbook – A tool to guide you in planning and prioritizing projects to build an effective digital business strategy.

    This tool guides you in planning and prioritizing projects to build an effective digital business strategy. Key activities include conducting a horizon scan, conducting a journey mapping exercise, prioritizing opportunities from a journey map, expanding opportunities into projects, and lastly, building the digital transformation roadmap using a Gantt chart visual to showcase project execution timelines.

    • Digital Strategy Workbook

    3. Digital Business Strategy Final Report Template – Use this template to capture the synthesized content from outputs of the activities.

    This deck is a visual presentation template for this blueprint. The intent is to capture the contents of the activities in a presentation PowerPoint. It uses sample data from “City of X” to demonstrate the digital business strategy.

    • Digital Business Strategy Final Report Template
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Define Your Digital Business Strategy

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Identify Two Existing Value Chains

    The Purpose

    Understand how your organization creates value today.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Identify opportunities for digital transformation in how you currently deliver value today.

    Activities

    1.1 Validate business context.

    1.2 Assess business ecosystem.

    1.3 Identify and prioritize value streams.

    1.4 Break down value stream into value chains.

    Outputs

    Business context

    Overview of business ecosystem

    Value streams and value chains

    2 Identify a Digitally Enabled Growth Opportunity

    The Purpose

    Leverage strategic foresight to evaluate how complex trends can evolve over time and identify opportunities to leapfrog competitors.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Identify a leapfrog idea to sidestep competitors.

    Activities

    2.1 Conduct a horizon scan.

    2.2 Identify leapfrog ideas.

    2.3 Identify impact to existing or new value chains.

    Outputs

    One leapfrog idea

    Corresponding value chain

    3 Transform Stakeholder Journeys

    The Purpose

    Design a journey map to empathize with your customers and identify opportunities to streamline or enhance existing and new experiences.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Identify a unified view of customer experience.

    Identify opportunities to automate non-routine cognitive tasks.

    Identify gaps in value delivery.

    Improve customer journey.

    Activities

    3.1 Identify stakeholder persona.

    3.2 Identify journey scenario.

    3.3 Conduct one journey mapping exercise.

    3.4 Identify opportunities to improve stakeholder journey.

    3.5 Break down opportunities into projects.

    Outputs

    Stakeholder persona

    Stakeholder scenario

    Journey map

    Journey-based projects

    4 Build a Digital Transformation Roadmap

    The Purpose

    Build a customer-centric digital transformation roadmap.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Keep your team on the same page with key projects, objectives, and timelines.

    Activities

    4.1 Prioritize and categorize initiatives.

    4.2 Build roadmap.

    Outputs

    Digital goals

    Unified roadmap

    Further reading

    Define Your Digital Business Strategy

    After a major crisis, find your place in the digital economy.

    Info-Tech Research Group

    Info-Tech is a provider of best-practice IT research advisory services that make every IT leader’s job easier.

    35,000 members sharing best practices you can leverage

    Millions spent developing tools and templates annually

    Leverage direct access to over 100 analysts as an extension of your team

    Use our massive database of benchmarks and vendor assessments

    Get up to speed in a fraction of the time

    Analyst Perspective

    Build business resilience and prepare for a digital economy.

    This is a picture of Senior Research Analyst, Dana Daher

    Dana Daher
    Senior Research Analyst

    To survive one of the greatest economic downturns since the Great Depression, organizations had to accelerate their digital transformation by engaging with the Digital Economy. To sustain growth and thrive as the pandemic eases, organizations must focus their attention on building business resilience by transforming how they deliver value today.
    This requires a value-driven approach to digital transformation that is capable of identifying what aspects of the business to transform, what technologies to embrace, what processes to automate, and what new business models to create. And most importantly, it needs to unify digital possibilities with your customer experiences.
    If there was ever a time for an organization to become a digital business, it is today.

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    • Your organization has difficulty adapting new technologies or rethinking the existing business models.
    • Your management lacks a framework to rethink how your organization delivers value today, which causes annual planning to become an ideation session that lacks focus.
    • There is uncertainty on how to meet evolving customer needs and how to compete in a digital economy.

    Common Obstacles

    • Your organization might approach digital transformation as if we were still in 2019, not recognizing that the pandemic resulted in a major shift to an end-to-end digital economy.
    • Your senior-most leadership thinks digital is "IT's problem" because digital is viewed synonymously with technology.
    • On the other hand, your IT team lacks the authority to make decisions without the executives’ involvement in the discussion around digital.

    Info-Tech’s Approach

    • Design a strategy that applies innovation to your business model, streamline and transform processes, and make use of technologies to enhance interactions with customers and employees.
    • Use digital for transforming non-routine cognitive activities and for de-risking key elements of the value chain.
    • Create a balanced roadmap that improves digital maturity and prepares you for long-term success in a digital economy.

    Info-Tech Insight

    After a major crisis, focus on restarting the growth engine and bolstering business resilience.

    Your digital business strategy aims to transform the business

    Digital Business Strategy

    • Looks for ways to transform the business by identifying what technologies to embrace, what processes to automate, and what new business models to create.
    • Unifies digital possibilities with your customer experiences.
    • Accountability lies with the executive leadership.
    • Must involve cross-functional participation from senior management from the different areas of the organization.

    IT Strategy

    • Aims to identify how to change, fix, or improve technology in support of the organization’s business strategy.
    • Accountability lies with the CIO.
    • Must involve IT management and gather strategic input from the business.

    Becoming a digital business

    Automate tasks to free up time for innovation.

    Business activities (tasks, procedures, and processes, etc.) are used to create, sell, buy, and deliver goods and services.

    When we convert information into a readable format used by computers, we call this digitization (e.g. converting paper into digital format). When we convert these activities into a format to be processed by a computer, we have digitalization (e.g. scheduling appointments online).

    These two processes alter how work takes place in an organization and form the foundation of the concept digital transformation.

    We maintain that digital transformation is all about becoming a “digital business” – an organization that performs more than 66% of all work activities via executable code.

    As organizations take a step closer to this optimal state, new avenues are open to identify advances to promote growth, enhance customer experiences, secure sustainability, drive operational efficiencies, and unearth potential future business ventures.

    Key Concepts:

    Digital: The representation of a physical item in a format used by computers

    Digitization: Conversion of information and processes into a digital format

    Digitalization: Conversion of information into a format to be processed by a computer

    Why transform your business?

    COVID-19 has irrefutably changed livelihoods, businesses, and the economy. During the pandemic, digital tools have acted as a lifeline, helping businesses and economies survive, and in the process, have acted as a catalyst for digital transformation.

    As organizations continue to safeguard business continuity and financial recovery, in the long term, recovery won’t be enough.

    Although many pandemic/recession recovery periods have occurred before, this next recovery period will present two first-time challenges no one has faced before. We must find ways to:

    • Recover from the COVID-19 recession.
    • Compete in a digital economy.

    To grow and thrive in this post-pandemic world, organizations must provide meaningful and lasting changes to brace for a future defined by digital technologies. – Dana Daher, Info-Tech Research Group

    We are amid an economic transformation

    What we are facing today is a paradigm shift transforming the ways in which we work, live, and relate to one another.

    In the last 60 years alone, performance and productivity have been vastly improved by IT in virtually all economic activities and sectors. And today, digital technologies continue to advance IT's contribution even further by bringing unprecedented insights into economic activities that have largely been untouched by IT.

    As technological innovation and the digitalization of products and services continue to support economic activities, a fundamental shift is occurring that is redefining how we live, work, shop, and relate to one another.

    These rapid changes are captured in a new 21st century term:

    The Digital Economy.

    90% of CEOs believe the digital economy will impact their industry. But only 25% have a plan in place. – Paul Taylor, Forbes, 2020

    Analyst Perspective

    Become a Digital Business

    this is a picture of Research Fellow, Kenneth McGee

    Kenneth McGee
    Research Fellow

    Today, the world faces two profoundly complex, mega-challenges simultaneously:

    1. Ending the COVID-19 pandemic and recession.
    2. Creating strategies for returning to business growth.

    Within the past year, healthcare professionals have searched for and found solutions that bring real hope to the belief the global pandemic/recession will soon end.

    As progress towards ending COVID-19 continues, business professionals are searching for the most effective near-term and long-term methods of restoring or exceeding the rates of growth they were enjoying prior to 2020.

    We believe developing a digital business strategy can deliver cost savings to help achieve near-term business growth while preparing an enterprise for long-term business growth by effectively competing within the digital economy of the future.

    The Digital Economy

    The digital economy refers to a concept in which all economic activity is facilitated or managed through digital technologies, data, infrastructure, services, and products (OECD, 2020).

    The digital economy captures decades of digital trends including:

    • Declining enterprise computing costs
    • Improvements in computing power and performance; unprecedent analytic capabilities
    • Rapid growth in network speeds, affordability, and geographic reach
    • High adoption rates of PCs, mobile, and other computing devices

    These trends among others have set the stage to permanently alter how buying and selling will take place within and between local, regional, national, and international economies.

    The emerging digital economy concept is so compelling that the world economists, financial experts, and others are currently investigating how they must substantially rewrite the rules governing how taxes, trade, tangible and intangible assets, and countless other financial issues will be assessed and valued in a digital economy.

    Download Info-Tech’s Digital Economy Report

    Signals of Change

    60%
    of People on Earth Use the Internet
    (DataReportal, 2021)
    20%
    of Global Retail Sales Performed via E-commerce
    (eMarketer, 2021)
    6.64T
    Global Business-to-Business
    E-commerce Market
    (Derived from The Business Research Company, 2021)
    9.6%
    of US GDP ($21.4T) accounted for by the digital economy ($2.05T)
    (Bureau of Economic Analysis, 2021)

    The digital economy captures technological developments transforming the way in which we live, work, and socialize

    Technological evolution

    this image contains a timeline of technological advances, from computers and information technology, to the digital economy of the future

    Info-Tech’s approach to digital business strategy

    A path to thrive in a digital economy.

    1. Identify top value chains to be transformed
    2. Identify a digitally enabled growth opportunity
    3. Transform stakeholder journeys
    4. Build a digital transformation roadmap

    Info-Tech Insight

    Pre-pandemic digital strategies have been primarily focused on automation. However, your post-pandemic digital strategy must focus on driving resilience for growth opportunities.

    The Info-Tech difference:

    • Understand how your organization creates value today to identify opportunities for digital transformation.
    • Leverage strategic foresight to evaluate how complex trends can evolve over time and identify opportunities to leapfrog competitors.
    • Design a journey map to empathize with your customers and identify opportunities to streamline or enhance existing and new experiences.
    • Create a balanced roadmap that improves digital maturity and prepares you for long-term success in a digital economy.

    A digital transformation starts by transforming how you deliver value today

    As digital transformation is an effort to transform how you deliver value today, it is important to understand the different value-generating activities that deliver an outcome for and from your customers.

    We do this by looking at value streams –which refer to the specific set of activities an industry player undertakes to create and capture value for and from the end consumer (and so the question to ask is, how do you make money as an organization?).

    Our approach helps you to digitally transform those value streams that generate the most value for your organization.

    Higher Education Value stream

    Recruitment → Admission → Student Enrolment → Instruction & Research → Graduation → Advancement

    Local Government Value Stream

    Sustain Land, Property, and the Environment → Facilitate Civic Engagement → Protect Local Health and Safety → Grow the Economy → Provide Regional Infrastructure

    Manufacturing Value Stream

    Design Product → Produce Product → Sell Product

    Visit Info-Tech’s Industry Coverage Research to identify your industry’s value streams

    Assess your external environment to identify new value generators

    Assessing your external environment allows you to identify trends that will have a high impact on how you deliver value today.

    Traditionally, a PESTLE analysis is used to assess the external environment. While this is a helpful tool, it is often too broad as it identifies macro trends that are not relevant to an organization's addressable market. That is because not every factor that affects the macro environment (for example, the country of operation) affects a specific organization’s industry in the same way.

    And so, instead of simply assessing the macro environment and trying to project its evolution along the PESTLE factors, we recommend to:

    • Conduct a PESTLE first and deduce, from the analysis, what are possible shifts in six characteristics of an organization’s industry, or
    • Proceed immediately with identifying evolutionary trends that impact the organization’s direct market.

    the image depicts the relationship of factors from the Macro Environment, to the Industry/Addressable Market, to the Organization. the macro environmental factors are Political; Economic; Social; Technological; Legal; and Environmental. the Industry/addressable market factors are the Customer; Talent; Regulation; technology and; Supply chain.

    Info-Tech Insight

    While PESTLE is helpful to scan the macro environment, the analysis often lacks relevance to an organization’s industry.

    An analysis of evolutionary shifts in five industry-specific characteristics would be more effective for identifying trends that impact the organization

    A Market Evolution Trend Analysis (META) identifies changes in prevailing market conditions that are directly relevant to an organization’s industry, and thus provides some critical input to the strategy design process, since these trends can bring about strategic risks or opportunities.
    Shifts in these five characteristics directly impact an organization:

    ORGANIZATION

    • Customer Expectations
    • Talent Availability
    • Regulatory System
    • Supply Chain Continuity
    • Technological Landscape

    Capture existing and new value generators through a customer journey map

    As we prioritize value streams, we break them down into value chains – that is the “string” of processes that interrelate that work.

    However, once we identify these value chains and determine what parts we wish to digitally transform, we take on the perspective of the user, as the way they interact with your products and services will be different to the view of those within the organization who implement and provide those services.

    This method allows us to build an empathetic and customer-centric lens, granting the capability to uncover challenges and potential opportunities. Here, we may define new experiences or redesign existing ones.

    This image contains an example of how a school might use a value chain and customer journey map. the value streams listed include: Recruitment; Admission; Student Enrolment; Instruction& Research; Graduation; and Advancement. the Value chain for the Instruction and Research Value stream. The value chain includes: Research; Course Creation, Delivery, and assessment. The Customer journey map for curricula delivery includes: Understanding the needs of students; Construct the course material; Deliver course material; Conduct assessment and; Upload Grades into system

    A digital transformation is not just about customer journeys but also about building business resilience

    Pre-pandemic, a digital transformation was primarily focused around improving customer experiences. Today, we are facing a paradigm shift in the way in which we capture the priorities and strategies for a digital transformation.

    As the world grows increasingly uncertain, organizations need to continue to focus on improving customer experience while simultaneously protecting their enterprise value.

    Ultimately, a digital transformation has two purposes:

    1. The classical model – whereby there is a focus on improving digital experiences.
    2. Value protection or the reduction of enterprise risk by systematically identifying how the organization delivers value and digitally transforming it to protect future cashflows and improve the overall enterprise value.
    Old Paradigm New Paradigm
    Predictable regulatory changes with incremental impact Unpredictable regulatory changes with sweeping impact
    Reluctance to use digital collaboration Wide acceptance of digital collaboration
    Varied landscape of brick-and-mortar channels Last-mile consolidation
    Customers value brand Customers value convenience/speed of fulfilment
    Intensity of talent wars depends on geography Broadened battlefields for the war for talent
    Cloud-first strategies Cloud-only strategies
    Physical assets Aggressive asset decapitalization
    Digitalization of operational processes Robotization of operational processes
    Customer experience design as an ideation mechanism Business resilience for value protection and risk reduction

    Key deliverable:

    Digital Business Strategy Presentation Template

    A highly visual and compelling presentation template that enables easy customization and executive-facing content.

    three images are depicted, which contain slides from the Digital Business Strategy presentation template, which will be available in 2022.

    *Coming in 2022

    Blueprint deliverables

    The Digital Business Strategy Workbook supports each step of this blueprint to help you accomplish your goals:

    Initiative Prioritization

    A screenshot from the Initiative Prioritization blueprint is depicted, no words are legible in the image.

    Use the weighted scorecard approach to evaluate and prioritize your opportunities and initiatives.

    Roadmap Gantt Chart

    A screenshot from the Roadmap Gantt Chart blueprint is depicted, no words are legible in the image.

    Populate your Gantt chart to visually represent your key initiative plan over the next 12 months.

    Journey Mapping Workbook

    A screenshot from the Journey Mapping Workbook blueprint is depicted, no words are legible in the image.

    Populate the journey maps to evaluate a user experience over its end-to-end journey.

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    “Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful.”

    Guided Implementation

    “Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track.”

    Workshop

    “We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place.”

    Consulting

    “Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project.”

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

    Guided Implementation

    What does a typical GI on this topic look like?

    Phase 0 Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4
    Call #1:
    Discuss business context and customize your organization’s capability map.
    Call #2:
    Assess business ecosystem.
    Call #3:
    Perform horizon scanning and trends identification.
    Call #5:
    Identify stakeholder personas and scenarios.
    Call #7:
    Discuss initiative generation and inputs into roadmap.
    Call #3:
    Identify how your organization creates value.
    Call #4:
    Discuss value chain impact.
    Call #6:
    Complete journey mapping exercise.
    Call #8:
    Summarize results and plan next steps.

    A Guided Implementation (GI) is a series of calls with an Info-Tech analyst to help implement our best practices in your organization.
    A typical GI is between 8 to 12 calls over the course of 2 to 4 months.

    Workshop Requirements

    Business Inputs

    Gather business strategy documents and find information on:

    • Business goals
    • Current transformation initiatives
    • Business capabilities to create or enhance
    • Identify top ten revenue and expense generators
    • Identify stakeholders

    Interview the following stakeholders to uncover business context information:

    • CEO
    • CIO

    Download the Business Context Discovery Tool

    Optional Diagnostic

    • Assess your digital maturity (Concierge Service)

    Visit Assess Your Digital Maturity

    Phase 1

    Identify top value chains to be transformed

    • Understand the business
    • Assess your business ecosystem
    • Identify two value chains for transformation

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    Understand how your organization delivers value today and identify value chains to be transformed.

    This phase involves the following participants:

    A cross-functional cohort across all levels of the organization.

    Outcomes

    • Business ecosystem
    • Existing value chains to be transformed

    Step 1.1

    Understand the business

    Activities

    • Review business documents.

    Identify top value chains to be transformed

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    In this section you will gain an understanding of the business context for your strategy.

    This step involves the following participants:

    A cross-functional cohort across levels in the organization.

    Outcomes of this step

    Business Context

    Understand the business context

    Understanding the business context is a must for all strategic initiatives. A pre-requisite to all strategic planning should be to elicit the business context from your business stakeholders.

    Inputs Document(s)/ Method Outputs
    Key stakeholders Strategy Document Stakeholders that are actively involved in, affected by or influence outcome of the organization, e.g. employers, customers, vendors.
    Vision and mission of the organization Website Strategy Document What the organization wants to achieve and how it strives to accomplish those goals.
    Business drivers CEO Interview Inputs and activities that drive the operational and financial results of the organization.
    Key targets CEO Interview Quantitative benchmarks to support strategic goals, e.g. double the enterprise EBITD, improve top-of-mind brand awareness by 15%,
    Strategic investment goals CFO Interview
    Digital Strategy
    Financial investments corresponding with strategic objectives of the organization, e.g. geographic expansion, digital investments.
    Top three value-generating lines of business Financial Document Identification of your top three value-generating products and services or lines of business.
    Goals of the organization over the next 12 months Strategy Document
    Corporate Retreat Notes
    Strategic goals to support the vision, e.g. hire 100 new sales reps, improve product management and marketing.
    Top business initiatives over the next 12 months Strategy Document
    CEO Interview
    Internal campaigns to support strategic goals, e.g. invest in sales team development, expand the product innovation team.
    Business model Strategy Document Products or services that the organization plans to sell, the identified market and customer segments, price points, channels and anticipated expenses.
    Competitive landscape Internal Research Analysis Who your typical or atypical competitors are.

    1.1 Understand the business context

    Objective: Elicit the business context with a careful review of business and strategy documents.

    1. Gather the strategy creation team and review your business context documents. This includes business strategy documents, interview notes from executive stakeholders, and other sources for uncovering the business strategy.
    2. Brainstorm in smaller groups answers to the question you were assigned:
      • What are the strengths and weaknesses of the organization?
      • What are some areas of improvement or opportunity?
      • What does it mean to have a digital business strategy?
    3. Discuss the questions above with participants and document key findings. Share with the group and work through the balanced scorecard questions to complete this exercise.
    4. Document your findings.

    Assess your digital readiness with Info-Tech’s Digital Maturity Assessment

    Input

    • Business Strategy Documents
    • Executive Stakeholder Interviews

    Output

    • Business Context Information

    Materials

    • Collaboration/ Brainstorming Tool (whiteboard, flip chart, digital equivalent)

    Participants

    • Executive Team

    Step 1.2

    Assess your business ecosystem

    Activities

    • Identify disruptors and incumbents.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Your digital business strategy cannot be formulated without a clear vision of the evolution of your industry.

    Identify top value chains to be transformed

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    In this section, we will assess who the incumbents and disruptors are in your ecosystem and identify who your stakeholders are.

    This step involves the following participants:

    A cross-functional cohort across levels in the organization.

    Outcomes of this step

    Business Ecosystem

    Assess your business ecosystem

    Understand the nature of your competition.

    Learn what your competitors are doing.

    To survive, grow, or transform in today's digital era, organizations must first have a strong pulse on their business ecosystem. Learning what your competitors are doing to grow their bottom line is key to identifying how to grow your own. Start by understanding who the key incumbents and disruptors in your industry are to identify where your industry is heading.

    Incumbents: These are established leaders in the industry that possess the largest market share. Incumbents often focus their attention to their most demanding or profitable customers and neglect the needs of those down market.

    Disruptors: Disruptors are primarily new entrants (typically startups) that possess the ability to displace the existing market, industry, or technology. Disruptors are often focused on smaller markets that the incumbents aren’t focused on. (Clayton Christenson, 1997)

    An image is shown demonstrating the relationship within an industry between incumbents, disruptors, and the organization. The incumbents are represented by two large purple circles. The disruptors are represented by 9 smaller blue circles, which represent smaller individual customer bases, but overall account for a larger portion of the industry.

    ’Disruption’ specifically refers to what happens when the incumbents are so focused on pleasing their most profitable customers that they neglect or misjudge the needs of their other segments.– Ilan Mochari, Inc., 2015

    Example Business Ecosystem Analysis

    Business Target Market & Customer Product/Service & Key Features Key Differentiators Market Positioning
    University XYZ
    • Local Students
    • Continuous Learner
    • Certificate programs
    • Associate degrees
    • Strong engineering department with access to high-quality labs
    • Strong community impact
    Affordable education with low tuition cost and access to bursaries & scholarships.
    University CDE University CDE
    • Local students
    • International students
    • Continuous learning students
    • Continuous learning offerings (weekend classes)
    • Strong engineering program
    • Strong continuous learning programs
    Outcome focused university with strong co-ops/internship programs and career placements for graduates
    University MNG
    • Local students
    • Non degree, freshman and continuous learning adults
    • Associate degrees
    • Certificate programs (IT programs)
    • Dual credit program
    • More locations/campuses
    • Greater physical presence
    • High web presence
    Nurturing university with small student population and classroom sizes. University attractive to adult learners.
    Disruptors Online Learning Company EFG
    • Full-time employees & executives– (online presence important)
    • Shorter courses
    • Full-time employees & executives– (online presence important)
    Competitive pricing with an open acceptance policy
    University JKL Online Credential Program
    • High school
    • University students
    • Adult learners
    • Micro credentials
    • Ability to acquire specific skills
    Borderless and free (or low cost) education

    1.2 Understand your business ecosystem

    Objective: Identify the incumbents and disruptors in your business ecosystem.

    1. Identify the key incumbents and disruptors in your business ecosystem.
      • Incumbents: These are established leaders in the industry that possess the largest market share.
      • Disruptors: Disruptors are primarily new entrants (startups) that possess the ability to displace the existing market, industry, or technology.
    2. Identify target market and key customers. Who are the primary beneficiaries of your products or service offerings? Your key customers are those who keep you in business, increase profits, and are impacted by your operations.
    3. Identify what their core products or services are. Assess what core problem their products solve for key customers and what key features of their solution support this.
    4. Assess what the competitors' key differentiators are. There are many differentiators that an organization can have, examples include product, brand, price, service, or channel.
    5. Identify what the organization’s value proposition is. Why do customers come to them specifically? Leverage insights from the key differentiators to derive this.
    6. Finally, assess how your organization derives value relative to your competitors.

    Input

    • Market Assessment

    Output

    • Key Incumbents and Disruptors

    Materials

    • Collaboration/ Brainstorming Tool (whiteboard, flip chart, digital equivalent)

    Participants

    • Executive Team

    Step 1.3

    Value-chain prioritization

    Activities

    • Identify and prioritize value chains for innovation.

    Identify top value chains to be transformed

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    Identify and prioritize how your organization currently delivers value today and identify value chains to be transformed.

    This step involves the following participants:

    A cross-functional cohort across levels in the organization.

    Outcomes of this step

    Prioritized Value Chains

    Determine what value the organization creates

    Identify areas for innovation.

    Value streams and value chains connect business goals to the organization’s value realization activities. They enable an organization to create and capture value in the market place by engaging in a set of interconnected activities. Those activities are dependent on the specific industry segment an organization operates within.

    Different types of value your organization creates

    This an example of a value chain which a school would use to analyze how their organization creates value. The value streams listed include: Recruitment; Admission; Student Enrolment; Instruction& Research; Graduation; and Advancement. the Value chain for the Student enrolment stream is displayed. The value chain includes: Matriculation; Enrolment into a Program and; Unit enrolment.

    Value Streams

    A value stream refers to the specific set of activities an industry player undertakes to create and capture value for and from the end consumer.

    Value Chains

    A value chain is a ”string” of processes within a company that interrelate and work together to meet market demand. Examining the value chain of a company will reveal how it achieves competitive advantage.

    Visit Info-Tech’s Industry Coverage Research to identify value streams

    Begin with understanding your industry’s value streams

    Value Streams

    Recruitment

    • The promotion of the institution and the communication with prospective students is accommodated by the recruitment component.
    • Prospective students are categorized as domestic and international, undergraduate and graduate. Each having distinct processes.

    Admission

    • Admission into the university involves processes distinct from recruitment. Student applications are processed and evaluated and the students are informed of the decision.
    • This component is also concerned with transfer students and the approval of transfer credits.

    Student Enrolment

    • Student enrolment is concerned with matriculation when the student first enters the institution, and subsequent enrolment and scheduling of current students.
    • The component is also concerned with financial aid and the ownership of student records.

    Instruction & Research

    • Instruction involves program development, instructional delivery and assessment, and the accreditation of courses of study.
    • The research component begins with establishing policy and degree fundamentals and concerns the research through to publication and impact assessment.

    Graduation

    • Graduation is not only responsible for the ceremony but also the eligibility of the candidate for an award and the subsequent maintenance of transcripts.

    Advancement

    • Alumni relations are the first responsibility of advancement. This involves the continual engagement with former students.
    • Fundraising is the second responsibility. This includes the solicitation and stewardship of gifts from alumni and other benefactors.

    Value stream defined…

    Value streams connect business goals to the organization’s value realization activities in the marketplace. Those activities are dependent on the specific industry segment in which an organization operates.

    There are two types of value streams: core value streams and support value streams.

    • Core value streams are mostly externally facing. They deliver value to either an external or internal customer and they tie to the customer perspective of the strategy map.
    • Support value streams are internally facing and provide the foundational support for an organization to operate.

    An effective method for ensuring all value streams have been considered is to understand that there can be different end-value receivers.

    Leverage your industry’s capability maps to identify value chains

    Business Capability Map Defined

    A business capability defines what a business does to enable value creation, rather than how. Business capabilities:

    • Represent stable business functions.
    • Are unique and independent of each other.
    • Typically, will have a defined business outcome.

    A capability map is a great starting point to identify value chains within an organization as it is a strong indicator of the processes involved to deliver on the value streams.

    this image contains an example of a business capability map using the value streams identified earlier in this blueprint.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Leverage your industry reference architecture to define value streams and value chains.

    Visit Info-Tech’s Industry Coverage Research to identify value streams

    Prioritize value streams to be supported or enhanced

    Use an evaluation criteria that considers both the human and business value generators that these streams provide.

    two identical value streams are depicted. The right most value stream has Student Enrolment and Instruction Research highlighted in green. between the two streams, are two boxes. In these boxes is the following: Business Value: Profit; Enterprise Value; Brand value. Human Value: Faculty satisfaction; Student satisfaction; Community impact.

    Info-Tech Insight

    To produce maximum impact, focus on value streams that provide two-thirds of your enterprise value.

    Business Value

    Assess the value generators to the business, e.g. revenue dollars, enterprise value, cost or differentiation (competitiveness), etc.

    Human Value

    Assess the value generators to people, e.g. student/faculty satisfaction, well-being, and social cohesion.

    Identify value chains for transformation

    Value chains, pioneered by the academic Michael Porter, refer to the ”string” of processes within a company that interrelate and work together to meet market demand. An organization’s value chain is connected to the larger part of the value stream. This perspective of how value is generated encourages leaders to see each activity as a part of a series of steps required deliver value within the value stream and opens avenues to identify new opportunities for value generation.

    this image depicts two sample value chains for the value streams: student enrolment and Instruction & Research. Each value chain has a stakeholder associated with it. This is the primary stakeholder that seeks to gain value from that value chain.

    Prioritize value chains for transformation

    Once we have identified the key value chains within each value stream element, evaluate the individual processes within the value chain to identify opportunities for transformation. Evaluate the value chain processes based on the level of pain experienced by a stakeholder to accomplish that task, and the financial impact that level of the process has on the organization.

    this image depicts the same value chains as the image above, with a legend showing which steps have a financial impact, which steps have a high degree of risk, and which steps are prioritized for transformation. Matriculation and publishing are shown to have a financial impact. Research foundation is shown to have a high degree of risk, and enrollment into a program and conducting research are prioritized for transformation.

    1.3 Value chain analysis

    Objective: Determine how the organization creates value, and prioritize value chains for innovation.

    1. The first step of delivering value is defining how it will happen. Use the organization’s industry segment to start a discussion on how value is created for customers. Working back from the moment value is realized by the customer, consider the sequential steps required to deliver value in your industry segment.
    2. Define and validate the organization’s value stream. Write a short description of the value stream that includes a statement about the value provided and a clear start and end for the value stream.
    3. Prioritize the value streams based on an evaluation criteria that reflects business and human value generators to the organization.
    4. Identify value chains that are associated with each value stream. The value chains refer to a string of processes within the value stream element. Each value chain also captures a particular stakeholder that benefits from the value chain.
    5. Once we have identified the key value chains within each value stream element, evaluate the individual processes within the value chain and identify areas for transformation. Evaluate the value chain processes based on the level of pain or exposure to risk experienced by a stakeholder to accomplish that task and the financial impact that level of the process has on the organization.

    Visit Info-Tech’s Industry Coverage Research to identify value streams and capability maps

    Input

    • Market Assessment

    Output

    • Key Incumbents and Disruptors

    Materials

    • Collaboration/ Brainstorming Tool (whiteboard, flip chart, digital equivalent)

    Participants

    • Executive Team

    Phase 2

    Identify a digitally enabled growth opportunity

    • Conduct horizon scan
    • Identify leapfrog idea
    • Conduct value chain impact analysis

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    Assess trends that are impacting your industry and identify strategic growth opportunities.

    This phase involves the following participants:

    A cross-functional cohort across levels in the organization.

    Outcomes

    Identify new growth opportunities and value chains impacted

    Phase 2.1

    Horizon scanning

    Activities

    • Scan the internal and external environment for trends.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Systematically scan your environment to identify avenues or opportunities to skip one or several stages of technological development and stay ahead of disruption.

    Identify a digitally enabled growth opportunity

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    Scan the environment for external environment for megatrends, trends, and drivers. Prioritize trends and build a trends radar to keep track of trends within your environment.

    This step involves the following participants:

    A cross-functional cohort across levels in the organization.

    Outcomes of this step

    Growth opportunity

    Horizon scanning

    Understand how your industry is evolving.

    Horizon scanning is a systematic analysis of detecting early signs of future changes or threats.

    Horizon scanning involves scanning, analyzing, and communicating changes in an organization’s environment to prepare for potential threats and opportunities. Much of what we know about the future is based around the interactions and trajectory of macro trends, trends, and drivers. These form the foundations for future intelligence.

    Macro Trends

    A macro trend captures a large-scale transformative trend that could impact your addressable market.

    Trends

    A trend captures a business use case of the macro trend. Consider trends in relation to competitors in your industry.

    Drivers

    A driver is an underlying force causing the trend to occur. There can be multiple causal forces, or drivers, that influence a trend, and multiple trends can be influenced by the same causal force.

    Identify signals of change in the present and their potential future impacts.

    Identifying macro trends

    A macro trend captures a large-scale transformative trend that could change the addressable market. Here are some examples of macro trends to consider when horizon scanning for your own organization:

    Talent Availability

    • Decentralized workforce
    • Hybrid workforce
    • Diverse workforce
    • Skills gap
    • Digital workforce
    • Multigenerational workforce

    Customer Expectations

    • Personalization
    • Digital experience
    • Data ownership
    • Transparency
    • Accessibility

    Technological Landscape

    • AI & robotics
    • Virtual world
    • Ubiquitous connectivity,
    • Genomics
    • Materials (smart, nano, bio)

    Regulatory System

    • Market control
    • Economic shifts
    • Digital regulation
    • Consumer protection
    • Global green

    Supply Chain Continuity

    • Resource scarcity
    • Sustainability
    • Supply chain digitization
    • Circular supply chains
    • Agility

    Identifying trends and drivers

    A trend captures a business use case of a macro trend. Assessing trends can reduce some uncertainties about the future and highlight potential opportunities for your organization. A driver captures the internal or external forces that lead the trend to occur. Understanding and capturing drivers is important to understanding why these trends are occurring and the potential impacts to your value chains.

    This image contains a flow chart, demonstrating the relationship between Macro trends, Trends, and Drivers. in this example, the macro trend is Accessibility. The Trends, or patterns of change, are an increase in demands for micro-credentials, and Preference for eLearning. The Drivers, or the why, are addressing skill gaps for increase in demand for micro-credentials, and Accommodating adult/working learners- for Preference for eLearning.

    Leverage industry roundtables and trend reports to understand the art of the possible

    Uncover important business and industry trends that can inform possibilities for technology innovation.

    Explore trends in areas such as:

    • Machine Learning
    • Citizen Dev 2.0
    • Venture Architecture
    • Autonomous Organizations
    • Self-Sovereign Cloud
    • Digital Sustainability

    Market research is critical in identifying factors external to your organization and identifying technology innovation that will provide a competitive edge. It’s important to evaluate the impact each trend or opportunity will have in your organization and market.

    Visit Info-Tech’s Trends & Priorities Research Center

    Visit Info-Tech’s Industry Coverage Research to identify your industry’s value streams

    this image contains three screenshots from Rethinking Higher Education Report and 2021 Tech Trends Report

    Images are from Info-Tech’s Rethinking Higher Education Report and 2021 Tech Trends Report

    Example horizon scanning activity

    Macro Trends Trends Drivers
    Talent Availability Diversity Inclusive campus culture Systemic inequities
    Hybrid workforce Online learning staff COVID-19 and access to physical institutions
    Customer Expectations Digital experience eLearning for working learners Accommodate adult learners
    Accessibility Micro-credentials for non-traditional students Addressing skills gap
    Technological Landscape Artificial intelligence and robotics AI for personalized learning Hyper personalization
    IoT IoT for monitoring equipment Asset tracking
    Augmented reality Immersive education AR and VR Personalized experiences
    Regulatory System Regulatory System Alternative funding for research Changes in federal funding
    Global Green Environmental and sustainability education curricula Regulatory and policy changes
    Supply Chain Continuity Circular supply chains Vendors recycling outdated technology Sustainability
    Cloud-based solutions Cloud-based eLearning software Convenience and accessibility

    Visit Info-Tech’s Industry Coverage Research to identify your industry’s value streams

    Prioritize trends

    Develop a cross-industry holistic view of trends.

    Visualize emerging and prioritize action.

    Moving from horizon scanning to action requires an evaluation process to determine which trends can lead to growth opportunities. First, we need to make a short list of trends to analyze. For your digital strategy, consider trends on the time horizon that are under 24 months. Next, we need to evaluate the shortlisted opportunities by a second set of criteria: relevance to your organization and impact on industry.

    Timing

    The estimated time to disruption this trend will have for your industry. Assess whether the trend will require significant developments to support its entry into the ecosystem.

    Relevance

    The relevance of the trend to your organization. Does the trend fulfil the vision or goals of the organization?

    Impact

    The degree of impact the trend will have on your industry. A trend with high impact will drive new business models, products, or services.

    Prioritize trends to adopt into your organization

    Prioritize trends based on timing, impact, and relevance.

    Trend Timing
    (S/M/L)
    Impact
    (1-5)
    Relevance
    ( 1-5)
    1. Micro-credentialing S 5 5
    2. IoT-connected devices for personalized experience S 1 3
    3. International partnerships with educational institutions M
    4. Use of chatbots throughout enrollment process L
    5. IoT for energy management of campus facilities L
    6. Gamification of digital course content M
    7. Flexible learning curricula S 4 3
    Deprioritize trends
    that have a time frame
    to disruption of more
    than 24 months.
    this image contains a graph demonstrating the relationship between relevance (x axis) and Impact (Y axis).

    2.1 Scanning the horizon

    Objective: Generate trends

    60 minutes

    • Start by selecting macro trends that are occurring in your environment using the five categories. These are the large-scale transformative trends that impact your addressable market. Macro trends have three key characteristics:
      • They span over a long period of time.
      • They impact all geographic regions.
      • They impact governments, individuals, and organizations.
    • Begin to break down these macro trends into trends. Trends should reflect the direction of a macro trend and capture the pattern in events. Consider trends that directly impact your organization.
    • Understand the drivers behind these trends. Why are they occurring? What is driving them? Understanding the drivers helps us understand the value they may generate.
    • Deprioritize trends that are expected to happen beyond 24 months.
    • Prioritize trends that have a high impact and relevance to the organization.
    • If you identify more than one trend, discuss with the group which trend you would like to pursue and limit it to one opportunity.

    Input

    • Macro Trends
    • Trends

    Output

    • Trends Prioritization

    Materials

    • Digital Strategy Workbook

    Participants

    • Executive Team

    Step 2.2

    Leapfrogging ideation

    Activities

    • Identify leapfrog ideas.
    • Identify impact to value chain.

    Info-Tech Insight

    A systematic approach to leapfrog ideation is one of the most critical ways in which an organization can build the capacity for resilient innovation.

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    Evaluate trend opportunities and determine the strategic opportunities they pose. You will also work towards identifying the impact the trend has on your value chain.

    This step involves the following participants:

    A cross-functional cohort across levels in the organization.

    Outcomes of this step

    • Strategic growth opportunities
    • Value chain impact

    Leapfrog into the future

    Turn trends into growth opportunities.

    To thrive in the digital age, organizations must innovate big, leverage internal creativity, and prepare for flexibility.

    In this digital era, organizations are often playing catch up to a rapidly evolving technological landscape and following a strict linear approach to innovation. However, this linear catch-up approach does not help companies get ahead of competitors. Instead, organizations must identify avenues to skip one or several stages of technological development to leapfrog ahead of their competitors.

    The best way to predict the future is to invent it. – Alan Kay

    Leapfrogging takes place when an organization introduces disruptive innovation into the market and sidesteps competitors who are unable to mobilize to respond to the opportunities.

    Case Study

    Classroom of the Future

    Higher Education: Barco’s Virtual Classroom at UCL

    University College London (UCL), in the United Kingdom, selected Barco weConnect virtual classroom technology for its continuing professional development medical education offering. UCL uses the platform for synchronous teaching, where remote students can interact with a lecturer.

    One of the main advantages of the system is that it enables direct interaction with students through polls, questions, and whiteboarding. The system also allows you to track student engagement in real time.

    The system has also been leveraged for scientific research and publications. In their “Delphi” process, key opinion leaders were able to collaborate in an effective way to reach consensus on a subject matter. The processes that normally takes months were successfully completed in 48 hours (McCann, 2020).

    Results

    The system has been largely successful and has supported remote, real-time teaching, two-way engagement, engagement with international staff, and an overall enriched teaching experience.

    Funnel trends into leapfrog ideas

    Go from trend insights into ideas.

    Brainstorm ways of generating leapfrog ideas from trend insights.

    Dealing with trends is one of the most important tasks for innovation. It provides the basis of developing the future orientation of the organization. However, being aware of a trend is one thing, to develop strategies for response is another.

    To identify the impact the trend has on the organization, consider the four areas of growth strategies for the organization:

    1. New Customers: Leverage the trend to target new customers for existing products or services.
    2. New Business Models: Adjust the business model to capture a change in how the organization delivers value.
    3. New Markets: Enter or create new markets by applying existing products or services to different problems.
    4. New Product or Service Offerings: Introduce new products or services to the existing market.
    A funnel shaped image is depicted. At the top, at the entrance of the funnel, is the word Trend. At the bottom of the image, at the output of the funnel, is the word Opportunity.

    From trend to leapfrog ideas

    Trend New Customer New Market New Business Model New Product or Service
    What trends pose a high-immediate impact to the organization? Target new customers for existing products or services Enter or create new markets by applying existing products or services to different problems Adjust the business model to capture a change in how the organization delivers value Introduce new products or services to the existing market
    Micro-credentials for non-traditional students Target non-traditional learners/students - Online delivery Introduce mini MBA program

    2.2 Identify and prioritize opportunities

    60 minutes

    1. Gather the prioritized trend identified in the horizon scanning exercise (the trend identified to be “adopted” within the organization).
    2. Analyze each trend identified and assess whether the trend provides an opportunity for a new customers, new markets, new business models, or new products and services.

    Input

    • “Adopt” Trends

    Output

    • Trends to pursue
    • Breakdown of strategic opportunities that the trends pose

    Materials

    • Collaboration/ Brainstorming Tool (whiteboard, flip chart, digital equivalent)

    Participants

    • Executive Team

    Step 2.3

    Value chain impact

    Activities

    • Identify impact to value chain.

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    Evaluate trend opportunities and determine the strategic opportunities they pose. Prioritize the opportunities and identify impact to your value chain.

    This step involves the following participants:

    A cross-functional cohort across levels in the organization.

    Outcomes of this step

    • Strategic growth opportunities

    Value chain analysis

    Identify implications of strategic growth opportunities to the value chains.

    As we identify and prioritize the opportunities available to us, we need to assess their impacts on value chains. Does the opportunity directly impact an existing value chain? Or does it open us to the creation of a new value chain?

    The value chain perspective allows an organization to identify how to best minimize or enhance impacts and generate value.
    As we move from opportunity to impact, it is important to break down opportunities into the relevant pieces so we can see a holistic picture of the sources of differentiation.

    this image depicts the value chain for the value stream, student enrolment.

    2.3 Value chain impact

    Objective: Identify impacts to the value chain from the opportunities identified.
    60 minutes

    1. Once you have identified the opportunity, turn back to the value stream, and with the working group, identify the value stream impacted most by the opportunity. Leverage the human impact/business impact criteria to support the identification of the value stream to be impacted.
    2. Within the value stream, brainstorm what parts of the value chain will be impacted by the new opportunity. Or ask whether this new opportunity provides you with a new value chain to be created.
    3. If this opportunity will require a new value chain, identify what set of new processes or steps will be created to support this new entrant.
    4. Identify any critical value chains that will be impacted by the new opportunity. What areas of the value chain pose the greatest risk? And where can we estimate the financial revenue will be impacted the most?

    Input

    • Opportunity

    Output

    • Value chains impacted

    Materials

    • Collaboration/ Brainstorming Tool (whiteboard, flip chart, digital equivalent)

    Participants

    • Executive Team

    Phase 3

    Transform stakeholder journeys

    • Identify stakeholder personas and scenarios
    • Conduct journey map
    • Identify projects

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    Take the prioritized value chains and create a journey map to capture the end-to-end experience of a stakeholder.

    Through a journey mapping exercise, you will identify opportunities to digitize parts of the journey. These opportunities will be broken down into functional initiatives to tackle in your strategy.

    This phase involves the following participants:

    A cross-functional cohort across levels in the organization.

    Outcomes

    1. Stakeholder persona
    2. Stakeholder scenario
    3. Stakeholder journey map
    4. Opportunities

    Step 3.1

    Identify stakeholder persona and journey scenario

    Activities

    • Identify stakeholder persona.
    • Identify stakeholder journey scenario.

    Transform stakeholder journeys

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    In this step, you with identify stakeholder personas and scenarios relating to the prioritized value chains.

    This step involves the following participants:

    A cross-functional cohort across levels in the organization.

    Outcomes of this step

    • A taxonomy of critical stakeholder journeys.

    Identify stakeholder persona and journey scenario

    From value chain to journey scenario.

    Stakeholder personas and scenarios help us build empathy towards our customers. It helps put us into the shoes of a stakeholder and relate to their experience to solve problems or understand how they experience the steps or processes required to accomplish a goal. A user persona is a valuable basis for stakeholder journey mapping.

    A stakeholder scenario describes the situation the journey map addresses. Scenarios can be real (for existing products and services) or anticipated.

    A stakeholder persona is a fictitious profile to represent a customer or a user segment. Creating this persona helps us understand who your customers really are and why they are using your service or product.

    Learn more about applying design thinking methodologies

    Identify stakeholder scenarios to map

    For your digital strategy, leverage the existing and opportunity value chains identified in phase 1 and 2 for journey mapping.

    Identify two existing value chains to be transformed.
    In section 1, we identified existing value chains to be transformed. For example, your stakeholder persona is a member of the faculty (engineering), and the scenario is the curricula design process.
    this image contains the value chains for instruction (engineering) and enrolment of engineering student. the instruction(engineering) value chain includes curricula research, curricula design, curricula delivery, and Assessment for the faculty-instructor. The enrolment of engineering student value chain includes matriculation, enrolment into a program, and unit enrolment for the student. In the instruction(engineering) value chain, curricula design is highlighted in blue. In the enrolment of engineering student value chain, Enrolment into a program is highlighted.
    Identify one new value chain.
    In section 2, we identified a new value chain. However, for a new opportunity, the scenario is more complex as it may capture many different areas of a value chain. Subsequently, a journey map for a new opportunity may require mapping all parts of the value chain.
    this image contains an example of a value chain for micro-credentialing (mini online MBA)

    Identify stakeholder persona

    Who are you transforming for?

    To define a stakeholder scenario, we need to understand who we are mapping for. In each value chain, we identified a stakeholder who gains value from that value chain. We now need to develop a stakeholder persona: a representation of the end user to gain a strong understanding of who they are, what they need, and their pains and gains.

    One of the best ways to flesh out your stakeholder persona is to engage with the stakeholders directly or to gather the input of those who may engage with them within the organization.

    For example, if we want to define a journey map for a student, we might want to gather the input of students or teaching faculty that have firsthand encounters with different student types and are able to define a common student type.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Run a survey to understand your end users and develop a stronger picture of who they are and what they are seeking to gain from your organization.

    Example Stakeholder Persona

    Name: Anne
    Age: 35
    Occupation: Engineering Faculty
    Location: Toronto, Canada

    Pains

    What are their frustrations, fears, and anxieties?

    • Time restraints
    • Using new digital tools
    • Managing a class while incorporating individual learning
    • Varying levels within the same class
    • Unmotivated students

    What do they need to do?

    What do they want to get done? How will they know they are successful?

    • Design curricula in a hybrid mode without loss of quality of experience of in-classroom learning.

    Gains

    What are their wants, needs, hopes, and dreams?

    • Interactive content for students
    • Curriculum alignment
    • Ability to run a classroom lab (in hybrid format)
    • Self-paced and self-directed learning opportunities for students

    (Adapted from Osterwalder, et al., 2014)

    Define a journey statement for mapping

    Now that we understand who we are mapping for, we need to define a journey statement to capture the stakeholder journey.
    Leverage the following format to define the journey statement.
    As a [stakeholder], I need to [prioritized value chain task], so that I can [desired result or overall goal].

    this image contains the instruction(engineering) value chain shown above. next to it is a stakeholder journey statement, which states: As an engineering faculty member, I want to design my curricula in a hybrid mode of delivery so that I can simulate in-classroom experiences.

    3.1 Identify stakeholder persona and journey scenario

    Objective: Identify stakeholder persona and journey scenario statement for journey mapping exercise.

    1. Start by identifying who your stakeholder is. Give your stakeholder a demographic profile – capture a typical stakeholder for this value chain.
    2. Identify what the gains and pains are during this value chain and what the stakeholder is seeking to accomplish.
    3. Looking at the value chain, create a statement that captures the goals and needs of the stakeholder. Use the following format to create a statement:
      As a [stakeholder], I need to [prioritized value chain task], so that I can [desired result or overall goal].

    Input

    • Prioritized Value Chains (existing and opportunity)

    Output

    • Stakeholder Persona
    • Stakeholder Journey Statement

    Materials

    • Collaboration/ Brainstorming Tool (whiteboard, flip chart, digital equivalent)
    • Stakeholder Persona Canvas

    Participants

    • Executive Team
    • Stakeholders (if possible)
    • Individual who works directly with stakeholders

    Step 3.2

    Map stakeholder journeys

    Activities

    • Map stakeholder journeys.

    Transform stakeholder journeys

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    Prioritize the journeys by focusing on what matters most to the stakeholders and estimating the organizational effort to improve those experiences.

    This step involves the following participants:

    A cross-functional cohort across levels in the organization.

    Outcomes of this step

    • Candidate journeys identified for redesign or build.

    Leverage customer journey mapping to capture value chains to be transformed

    Conduct a journey mapping exercise to identify opportunities for innovation or automation.

    A journey-based approach helps an organization understand how a stakeholder moves through a process and interacts with the organization in the form of touch points, channels, and supporting characters. By identifying pain points in the journey and the activity types, we can identify opportunities for innovation and automation along the journey.

    Embrace design thinking methodologies to elevate the stakeholder journey and to build a competitive advantage for your organization.

    this image contains an example of the result of a journey mapping exercise. the main headings are Awareness, Consideration, Acquisition, Service and, Loyalty.

    Internal vs. external stakeholder perspective

    In journey mapping, we always start with the stakeholder's perspective, then eventually transition into what the organization does business-wise to deliver value to each stakeholder. It is important to keep in mind both perspectives while conducting a journey mapping exercise as there are often different roles, processes, and technologies associated with each of the journey steps.

    Stakeholder Journey
    (External Perspective)

    • Awareness
    • Consideration
    • Selecting
    • Negotiating
    • Approving

    Business Processes
    (Internal Perspective)

    • Preparation
    • Prospecting
    • Presentation
    • Closing
    • Follow-Up

    Info-Tech Insight

    Take the perspective of an end user, who interacts with your products and services, as it is different from the view of those inside the organization, who implement and provide those services.

    Build a stakeholder journey map

    A stakeholder journey map is a tool used to illustrate the user’s perceptions, emotions, and needs as they move through a process and interact with the organization in the form of touch points, channels, and supporting characters.

    this image depicts an example of a stakeholder journey map, the headings in the map are: Journey Activity; Touch Points; Metrics; Nature of Activity; Key Moments & Pain Points; Opportunities

    Stakeholder Journey Map: Journey Activity

    The journey activity refers to the steps taken to accomplish a goal.

    The journey activity comprises the steps or sequence of tasks the stakeholder takes to accomplish their goal. These steps reflect the high-level process your candidates perform to complete a task or solve a problem.

    Stakeholder Journey Map: Touch Points

    Touch points are the points of interaction between a stakeholder and the organization.

    A touch point refers to any time a stakeholder interacts with your organization or brand. Consider three main points of interaction with the customer in the journey:

    • Before: How did they find out about you? How did they first contact you to start this journey? What channels or mediums were used?
      • Social media
      • Rating & reviews
      • Word of mouth
      • Advertising
    • During: How was the sale or service accomplished?
      • Website
      • Catalog
      • Promotions
      • Point of sale
      • Phone system
    • After: What happened after the sale or service?
      • Billing
      • Transactional emails
      • Marketing emails
      • Follow-ups
      • Thank-you emails

    Stakeholder Journey Map: Nature of Activity

    The nature of activity refers to the type of task the journey activity captures.

    We categorize the activity type to identify opportunities for automation. There are four main types of task types, which in combination (as seen in the table below) capture a task or job to be automated.

    Routine Non-Routine
    Cognitive Routine Cognitive: repeatable tasks that rely on knowledge work, e.g. sales, administration
    Prioritize for automation (2)
    Non-Routine Cognitive: infrequent tasks that rely on knowledge work, e.g. driving, fraud detection
    Prioritize for automation (3)
    Non-Routine Cognitive: infrequent tasks that rely on knowledge work, e.g. driving, fraud detection Prioritize for automation (3) Routine Manual: repeatable tasks that rely on physical work, e.g. manufacturing, production
    Prioritize for automation (1)
    Non-Routine Manual: infrequent tasks that rely on physical work, e.g. food preparation
    Not mature for automation

    Info-Tech Insight

    Where automation makes sense, routine manual activities should be transformed first, followed by routine cognitive activities. Non-routine cognitive activities are the final frontier.

    Stakeholder Journey Map: Metrics

    Metrics are a quantifiable measurement of a process, activity, or initiative.

    Metrics are crucial to justify expenses and to estimate growth for capacity planning and resourcing. There are multiple benefits to identifying and implementing metrics in a journey map:

    • Metrics provide accurate indicators for accurate IT and business decisions.
    • Metrics help you identify stakeholder touch point efficiencies and problems and solve issues before they become more serious.
    • Active metrics tracking makes root cause analysis of issues much easier.

    Example of journey mapping metrics: Cost, effort, turnaround time, throughput, net promoter score (NPS), satisfaction score

    Stakeholder Journey Map: Key Moments & Pain Points

    Key moments and pain points refer to the emotional status of a stakeholder at each stake of the customer journey.

    The key moments are defining pieces or periods in a stakeholder's experience that create a critical turning point or memory.

    The pain points are the critical problems that the stakeholder is facing during the journey or business continuity risks. Prioritize identifying pain points around key moments.

    Info-Tech Insight

    To identify key moments, look for moments that can dramatically influence the quality of the journey or end the journey prematurely. To improve the experience, analyze the hidden needs and how they are or aren’t being met.

    Stakeholder Journey Map: Opportunities

    An opportunity is an investment into people, process, or technology for the purposes of building or improving a business capability and accomplishing a specific organizational objective.

    An opportunity refers to the initiatives or projects that should address a stakeholder pain. Opportunities should also produce a demonstrable financial impact – whether direct (e.g. cost reduction) or indirect (e.g. risk mitigation) – and be evaluated based on how technically difficult it will be to implement.

    Customer

    Create new or different experiences for customers

    Workforce

    Generate new organizational skills or new ways of working

    Operations

    Improve responsiveness and resilience of operations

    Innovation

    Develop different products or services

    Example of stakeholder journey output: Higher Education

    Stakeholder: A faculty member
    Journey: As an engineering faculty member, I want to design my curricula in a hybrid mode of delivery so that I can simulate in-classroom experiences

    Journey activity Understanding the needs of students Construct the course material Deliver course material Conduct assessments Upload grades into system
    Touch Points
    • Research (primary or secondary)
    • Teaching and learning center
    • Training on tools
    • Office suite
    • Video tools
    • PowerPoint live
    • Chat (live)
    • Forum (FAQ
    • Online assessment tool
    • ERP
    • LMS
    Nature of Activity Non-routine cognitive Non-routine cognitive Non-routine cognitive Routine cognitive Routine Manual
    Metrics
    • Time to completion
    • Time to completion
    • Student satisfaction
    • Student satisfaction
    • Student scores
    Ken Moments & Pain Points Lack of centralized repository for research knowledge
    • Too many tools to use
    • Lack of Wi-Fi connectivity for students
    • Loss of social aspects
    • Adjusting to new forms of assessments
    No existing critical pain points; process already automated
    Opportunities
    • Centralized repository for research knowledge
    • Rationalize course creation tool set
    • Connectivity self-assessment/checklist
    • Forums for students
    • Implement an online proctoring tool

    3.2 Stakeholder journey mapping

    Objective: Conduct journey mapping exercise for existing value chains and for opportunities.

    1. Gather the working group and, with the journey mapping workbook, begin to map out the journey scenario statements identified in the value chain analysis. In total, there should be three journey maps:
      • Two for the existing value chains. Map out the specific point in the value chain that is to be transformed.
      • One for the opportunity value chain. Map out all parts of the value chain to be impacted by the new opportunity.
    2. Start with the journey activity and map out the steps involved to accomplish the goal of the stakeholder.
    3. Identify the touch points involved in the value chain.
    4. Categorize the nature of the activity in the journey activity.
    5. Identify metrics for the journey. How can we measure the success of the journey?
    6. Identify pain points and opportunities in parallel with one another.

    Input

    • Value Chain Analysis
    • Stakeholder Personas
    • Journey Mapping Scenario

    Output

    • Journey Map

    Materials

    • Digital Strategy Workbook, Stakeholder Journey tab

    Participants

    • Executives
    • Individuals in the organization that have a direct interaction with the stakeholders

    Info-Tech Insight

    Aim to build out 90% of the stakeholder journey map with the working team; validate the last 10% with the stakeholder themselves.

    Step 3.3

    Prioritize opportunities

    Activities

    • Prioritize opportunities.

    Transform stakeholder journeys

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    Prioritize the opportunities that arose from the stakeholder journey mapping exercise.

    This step involves the following participants:

    A cross-functional cohort across levels in the organization.

    Outcomes of this step

    Prioritized opportunities

    Prioritization of opportunities

    Leverage design-thinking methods to prioritize opportunities.

    As there may be many opportunities arising from the journey map, we need to prioritize ideas to identify which ones we can tackle first – or at all. Leverage IDEO’s design-thinking “three lenses of innovation” to support prioritization:

    • Feasibility: Do you currently have the capabilities to deliver on this opportunity? Do we have the right partners, resources, or technology?
    • Desirability: Is this a solution the stakeholder needs? Does it solve a known pain point?
    • Viability: Does this initiative have an impact on the financial revenue of the organization? Is it a profitable solution that will support the business model? Will this opportunity require a complex cost structure?
    Opportunities Feasibility
    (L/M/H)
    Desirability
    (L/M/H)
    Viability
    (L/M/H)
    Centralized repository for research knowledge H H H
    Rationalize course creation tool set H H H
    Connectivity self-assessment/ checklist H M H
    Forums for students M H H
    Exam preparation (e.g. education or practice exams) H H H

    3.3 Prioritization of opportunities

    Objective: Prioritize opportunities for creating a roadmap.

    1. Gather the opportunities identified in the journey mapping exercise
    2. Assess the opportunities based on IDEO’s three lenses of innovation:
      • Feasibility: Do you currently have the capabilities to deliver on this opportunity? Do we have the right partners, resources, or technology?
      • Viability: Does this initiative have an impact on the financial revenue of the organization? Is it a profitable solution that will support the business model? Will this opportunity require a complex cost structure?
      • Desirability: Is this a solution the stakeholder needs? Does it solve a known pain point?
    3. Opportunities that score high in all three areas are prioritized for the roadmap.

    Input

    • Opportunities From Journey Map

    Output

    • Prioritized Opportunities

    Materials

    • Digital Strategy Workbook

    Participants

    • Executives

    Step 3.4

    Define digital goals

    Activities

    Transform stakeholder journeys

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    Define a digital goal as it relates to the prioritized opportunities and the stakeholder journey map.

    This step involves the following participants:

    A cross-functional cohort across levels in the organization.

    Outcomes of this step

    Digital goals

    Define digital goals

    What digital goals can be derived from the stakeholder journey?

    With the prioritized set of opportunities for each stakeholder journey, take a step back and assess what the sum of these opportunities mean for the journey. What is the overall goal or objective of these opportunities? How do these opportunities change or facilitate the journey experience? From here, identify a single goal statement for each stakeholder journey.

    Stakeholder Scenario Prioritized Opportunities Goal
    Faculty (Engineering) As a faculty (Engineering), I want to prepare and teach my course in a hybrid mode of delivery Centralized repository for research knowledge
    Rationalized course creation tool set
    Support hybrid course curricula development through value-driven toolsets and centralized knowledge

    3.4 Define digital goals

    Objective: Identify digital goals derived from the journey statements.

    1. With the prioritized set of opportunities for each stakeholder journey (the two existing journeys and one opportunity journey) take a step back and assess what the sum of these opportunities means for each journey.
      • What is the overall goal or objective of these opportunities?
      • How do these opportunities change or facilitate the journey experience?
    2. From here, identify a single goal for each stakeholder journey.

    Input

    • Opportunities From Journey Map
    • Stakeholder Persona

    Output

    • Digital Goals

    Materials

    • Prioritization Matrix

    Participants

    • Executives

    Step 3.5

    Breakdown opportunities into series of initiatives

    Activities

    • Identify initiatives from the opportunities.

    Transform stakeholder journeys

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    Identify people, process, and technology initiatives for the opportunities identified.

    This step involves the following participants:

    A cross-functional cohort across levels in the organization.

    Outcomes of this step

    • People, process, and technology initiatives

    Break down opportunities into a series of initiatives

    Brainstorm initiatives for each high-priority opportunity using the framework below. Describe each initiative as a plan or action to take to solve the problem.

    Opportunity → Initiatives:

    People: What initiatives are required to manage people, data, and other organizational factors that are impacted by this opportunity?

    Process: What processes must be created, changed, or removed based on the data?

    Technology: What systems are required to support this opportunity?

    Break down opportunities into a series of initiatives

    Initiatives
    Centralized repository for research knowledge Technology Acquire and implement knowledge management application
    People Train researchers on functionality
    Process Periodically review and validate data entries into repository
    Initiatives
    Rationalize course creation toolset Technology Retire duplicate or under-used tools
    People Provide training on tool types and align to user needs
    Process Catalog software applications and tools across the organization
    Identify under-used or duplicate tools/applications

    Info-Tech Insight

    Ruthlessly evaluate if a initiative should stand alone or if it can be rolled up with another. Fewer initiatives or opportunities increases focus and alignment, allowing for better communication.

    3.5 Break down opportunities into initiatives

    Objective: Break down opportunities into people, process, and technology initiatives.

    1. Split into groups and identify initiatives required to deliver on each opportunity. Document each initiative on sticky notes.
    2. Have each team answer the following questions to identify initiatives for the prioritized opportunities:
      • People: What initiatives are required to manage people, data, and other organizational factors that are impacted by this opportunity?
      • Process: What processes must be created, changed, or removed based on the data?
      • Technology: What systems are required to support this opportunity?
    3. Document findings in the Digital Strategy Workbook.

    Input

    • Opportunities

    Output

    • Opportunity initiatives categorized by people, process and technology

    Materials

    • Digital Strategy Workbook

    Participants

    • Executive team

    Phase 4

    Build a digital transformation roadmap

    • Detail initiatives
    • Build a unified roadmap roadmap

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    Build a digital transformation roadmap that captures people, process, and technology initiatives.

    This phase involves the following participants:

    A cross-functional cohort across levels in the organization.

    Outcomes

    • Digital transformation roadmap

    Step 4.1

    Detail initiatives

    Activities

    • Detail initiatives.

    Build a digital transformation roadmap

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    Detail initiatives for each priority initiative on your horizon.

    This step involves the following participants:

    A cross-functional cohort across levels in the organization.

    Outcomes of this step

    • A roadmap for your digital business strategy.

    Create initiative profiles for each high-priority initiative on your strategy

    this image contains a screenshot of an example initiative profile

    Step 4.2

    Build a roadmap

    Activities

    • Create a roadmap of initiatives.

    Build a digital transformation roadmap

    Info-Tech Insight

    A roadmap that balances growth opportunities with business resilience will transform your organization for long-term success in the digital economy.

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    Identify timing of initiatives and build a Gantt chart roadmap.

    This step involves the following participants:

    A cross-functional cohort across levels in the organization.

    Outcomes of this step

    • A roadmap for your digital transformation and the journey canvases for each of the prioritized journeys.

    Build a roadmap to visualize your key initiative plan

    Visual representations of data are more compelling than text alone.

    Develop a high-level document that travels with the initiative from inception through executive inquiry, project management, and finally execution.

    A initiative needs to be discrete: able to be conceptualized and discussed as an independent item. Each initiative must have three characteristics:

    • Specific outcome: Describe an explicit change in the people, processes, or technology of the enterprise.
    • Target end date: When the described outcome will be in effect.
    • Owner: Who on the IT team is responsible for executing on the initiative.
    this image contains screenshots of a sample roadmap for supporting hybrid course curricula development through value-driven toolsets and centralized knowledge.

    4.2 Build your roadmap (30 minutes)

    1. For the Gantt chart:
      • Input the Roadmap Start Year date.
      • Change the months and year in the Gantt chart to reflect the same roadmap start year.
      • Populate the planned start and planned end date for the pre-populated list of high-priority initiatives in each category (people, process, and technology).

    Input

    • Initiatives
    • Initiative start & end dates
    • Initiative category

    Output

    • Digital strategy roadmap visual

    Materials

    • Digital Strategy Workbook

    Participants

    • Senior Executive

    Learn more about project portfolio management strategy

    Step 4.3

    Create a refresh strategy

    Activities

    • Refresh your strategy.

    Build a digital transformation roadmap

    Info-Tech Insight

    A digital strategy is a design process, it must be revisited to pressure test and account for changes in the external environment.

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    Detail a refresh strategy.

    This step involves the following participants:

    A cross-functional cohort across levels in the organization.

    Outcomes of this step

    • Refresh strategy

    Create a refresh strategy

    It is important to dedicate time to your strategy throughout the year. Create a refresh plan to assess for the changing business context and its impact on the digital business strategy. Make sure the regular planning cycle is not the primary trigger for strategy review. Put a process in place to review the strategy and make your organization proactive. Start by examining the changes to the business context and how the effect would trickle downwards. It’s typical for organizations to build a refresh strategy around budget season and hold planning and touch points to accommodate budget approval time.
    Example:

    this image contains an example of a refresh strategy.

    4.3 Create a refresh strategy (30 minutes)

    1. Work with the digital strategy creation team to identify the time frequencies the organization should consider to refresh the digital business strategy. Time frequencies can also be events that trigger a review (i.e. changing business goals). Record the different time frequencies in the Refresh of the Digital Business Strategy slide of the section.
    2. Discuss with the team the different audience members for each time frequency and the scope of the refresh. The scope represents what areas of the digital business strategy need to be re-examined and possibly changed.

    Example:

    Frequency Audience Scope Date
    Annually Executive Leadership Resurvey, review/ validate, update schedule Pre-budget
    Touch Point Executive Leadership Status update, risks/ constraints, priorities Oct 2021
    Every Year (Re-build) Executive Leadership Full planning Jan 2022

    Input

    • Digital Business Strategy

    Output

    • Refresh Strategy

    Materials

    • Digital Business Strategy Presentation Template
    • Collaboration/ Brainstorming Tool (whiteboard, flip chart, digital equivalent)

    Participants

    • Executive Leaders

    Related Info-Tech Research

    Design a Customer-Centric Digital Operating Model

    Design a Customer-Centric Digital Operating Model

    Establish a new way of working to deliver value on your digital transformation initiatives.

    Develop a Project Portfolio Management Strategy

    Develop a Project Portfolio Management Strategy

    Drive project throughput by throttling resource capacity.

    Adopt Design Thinking in Your Organization

    Adopt Design Thinking in Your Organization

    Innovation needs design thinking.

    Digital Maturity Improvement Service

    Digital Maturity Improvement Service

    Prepare your organization for digital transformation – or risk falling behind.

    Research Contributors and Experts

    Kenneth McGee

    this is a picture of Research Fellow, Kenneth McGee

    Research Fellow
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Kenneth McGee is a Research Fellow within the CIO practice at Info-Tech Research Group and is focused on IT business and financial management issues, including IT Strategy, IT Budgets and Cost Management, Mergers & Acquisitions (M&A), and Digital Transformation. He also has extensive experience developing radical IT cost reduction and return-to-growth initiatives during and following financial recessions.

    Ken works with CIOs and IT leaders to help establish twenty-first-century IT organizational charters, structures, and responsibilities. Activities include IT organizational design, IT budget creation, chargeback, IT strategy formulation, and determining the business value derived from IT solutions. Ken’s research has specialized in conducting interviews with CEOs of some of the world’s largest corporations. He has also interviewed a US Cabinet member and IT executives at the White

    House. He has been a frequent keynote speaker at industry conventions, client sales kick-off meetings, and IT offsite planning sessions.

    Ken obtained a BA in Cultural Anthropology from Dowling College, Oakdale, NY, and has pursued graduate studies at Polytechnic Institute (now part of NYU University). He has been an adjunct instructor at State University of New York, Westchester Community College.

    Jack Hakimian

    this is a picture of Vice President of the Info-Tech Research Group, Jack Hakimian

    Vice President
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Jack has more than 25 years of technology and management consulting experience. He has served multi-billion dollar organizations in multiple industries including Financial Services and Telecommunications. Jack also served a number of large public sector institutions.

    Prior to joining the Info-Tech Research Group, he worked for leading consulting players such as Accenture, Deloitte, EY, and IBM.

    Jack led digital business strategy engagements as well as corporate strategy and M&A advisory services for clients across North America, Europe, the Middle East, and Africa. He is a seasoned technology consultant who has developed IT strategies and technology roadmaps, led large business transformations, established data governance programs, and managed the deployment of mission-critical CRM and ERP applications.

    He is a frequent speaker and panelist at technology and innovation conferences and events and holds a Master’s degree in Computer Engineering as well as an MBA from the ESCP-EAP European School of Management.

    Bibliography

    Abrams, Karin von. “Global Ecommerce Forecast 2021.” eMarketer, Insider Intelligence, 7 July 2021. Web.

    Christenson, Clayton. The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Harvard Business School, 1997. Book.

    Drucker, Peter F., and Joseph A. Maciariello. Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Routledge, 2015.

    Eagar, Rick, David Boulton, and Camille Demyttenaere. “The Trends in Megatrends.” Arthur D Little, Prism, no. 2, 2014. Web.

    Enright, Sara, and Allison Taylor. “The Future of Stakeholder Engagement.” The Business of a Better World, October 2016. Web.

    Hatem, Louise, Daniel Ker, and John Mitchell. “A roadmap toward a common framework for measuring the digital economy.” Report for the G20 Digital Economy Task Force, OECD, 2020. Web.

    Kemp, Simon. “Digital 2021 April Statshot Report.” DataReportal, Global Digital Insights, 21 Apr. 2021. Web.

    Larson, Chris. “Disruptive Innovation Theory: 4 Key Concepts.” Business Insights, Harvard Business School, HBS Online, 15 Nov. 2016. Web.

    McCann, Leah. “Barco's Virtual Classroom at UCL: A Case Study for the Future of All University Classrooms?” rAVe, 2 July 2020. Web.

    Mochari, Ilan. “The Startup Buzzword Almost Everyone Uses Incorrectly.” Inc., 19 Nov. 2015. Web.

    Osterwalder, Alexander, et al. Value Proposition Design. Wiley, 2014.

    Reed, Laura. “Artificial Intelligence: Is Your Job at Risk?” Science Node, 9 August 2017.

    Rodeck, David. “Alphabet Soup: Understanding the Shape of a Covid-19 Recession.” Forbes, 8 June 2020. Web.

    Tapscott, Don. Wikinomics. Atlantic Books, 2014.

    Taylor, Paul. “Don't Be A Dodo: Adapt to the Digital Economy.” Forbes, 27 Aug. 2015. Web.

    The Business Research Company. "Wholesale Global Market Report 2021: COVID-19 Impact and Recovery to 2030." Research and Markets, January 2021. Press Release.

    “Topic 1: Megatrends and Trends.” BeFore, 11 October 2018.

    “Updated Digital Economy Estimates – June 2021.” Bureau of Economic Analysis, June 2021. Web.

    Williamson, J. N. The Leader Manager. John Wiley & Sons, 1984.

    Strengthen the SSDLC for Enterprise Mobile Applications

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}283|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Mobile Development
    • Parent Category Link: /mobile-development
    • CEOs see mobile for employees as their top mandate for upcoming technology innovation initiatives, making security a key competency for development.
    • Unsecure mobile applications can cause your employees to question the mobile applications’ integrity for handling sensitive data, limiting uptake.
    • Secure mobile development tends to be an afterthought, where vulnerabilities are tested for post-production rather than during the build process.
    • Developers lack the expertise, processes, and proper tools to effectively enhance applications for mobile security.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Organizations currently react to security issues. Info-Tech recommends a proactive approach to ensure a secure software development life cycle (SSDLC) end-to-end.
    • Organizations currently lack the secure development practices to provide highly secure mobile applications that end users can trust.
    • Enable your developers with five key secure development techniques from Info-Tech’s development toolkit.

    Impact and Result

    • Embed secure development techniques into your SDLC.
    • Create a repeatable process for your developers to continually evaluate and optimize mobile application security for new threats and corresponding mitigation steps.
    • Build capabilities within your team based on Info-Tech’s framework by supporting ongoing security improvements through monitoring and metric analysis.

    Strengthen the SSDLC for Enterprise Mobile Applications Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should adopt secure development techniques for mobile application development, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Assess secure mobile development processes

    Determine the current security landscape of mobile application development.

    • Strengthen the SSDLC for Enterprise Mobile Applications – Phase 1: Assess Secure Mobile Development Practices
    • Systems Architecture Template
    • Mobile Application High-Level Design Requirements Template

    2. Implement and test secure mobile techniques

    Incorporate the various secure development techniques into current development practices.

    • Strengthen the SSDLC for Enterprise Mobile Applications – Phase 2: Implement and Test Secure Mobile Techniques

    3. Monitor and support secure mobile applications

    Create a roadmap for mobile optimization initiatives.

    • Strengthen the SSDLC for Enterprise Mobile Applications – Phase 3: Monitor and Support Secure Mobile Applications
    • Mobile Optimization Roadmap
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Strengthen the SSDLC for Enterprise Mobile Applications

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Assess Your Secure Mobile Development Practices

    The Purpose

    Identification of the triggers of your secure mobile development initiatives.

    Assessment of the security vulnerabilities in your mobile applications from an end-user perspective.

    Identification of the execution of your mobile environment.

    Assessment of the mobile threats and vulnerabilities to your systems architecture.

    Prioritization of your mobile threats.

    Creation of your risk register.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Key opportunity areas where a secure development optimization initiative can provide tangible benefits.

    Identification of security requirements.

    Prioritized list of security threats.

    Initial mobile security risk register created. 

    Activities

    1.1 Establish the triggers of your secure mobile development initiatives.

    1.2 Assess the security vulnerabilities in your mobile applications from an end-user perspective.

    1.3 Understand the execution of your mobile environment with a systems architecture.

    1.4 Assess the mobile threats and vulnerabilities to your systems architecture.

    1.5 Prioritize your mobile threats.

    1.6 Begin building your risk register.

    Outputs

    Mobile Application High-Level Design Requirements Document

    Systems Architecture Diagram

    2 Implement and Test Your Secure Mobile Techniques

    The Purpose

    Discovery of secure development techniques to apply to current development practices.

    Discovery of new user stories from applying secure development techniques.

    Discovery of new test cases from applying secure development techniques.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Areas within your code that can be optimized for improving mobile application security.

    New user stories created in relation to mitigation steps.

    New test cases created in relation to mitigation steps.

    Activities

    2.1 Gauge the state of your secure mobile development practices.

    2.2 Identify the appropriate techniques to fill gaps.

    2.3 Develop user stories from security development gaps identified.

    2.4 Develop test cases from user story gaps identified.

    Outputs

    Mobile Application High-Level Design Requirements Document

    3 Monitor and Support Your Secure Mobile Applications

    The Purpose

    Identification of key metrics used to measure mobile application security issues.

    Identification of secure mobile application and development process optimization initiatives.

    Identification of enablers and blockers of your mobile security optimization.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Metrics for measuring application security.

    Modified triaging process for addressing security issues.

    Initiatives for development optimization.

    Enablers and blockers identified for mobile security optimization initiatives.

    Process for developing your mobile optimization roadmap.

    Activities

    3.1 List the metrics that would be gathered to assess the success of your mobile security optimization.

    3.2 Adjust and modify your triaging process to enhance handling of security issues.

    3.3 Brainstorm secure mobile application and development process optimization initiatives.

    3.4 Identify the enablers and blockers of your mobile security optimization.

    3.5 Define your mobile security optimization roadmap.

    Outputs

    Mobile Optimization Roadmap

    Select and Implement an IT PPM Solution

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}440|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 10.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $125,999 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 29 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Portfolio Management
    • Parent Category Link: /portfolio-management
    • The number of IT project resources and the quantity of IT projects and tasks can no longer be recorded, prioritized, and tracked using non-commercial project portfolio management (PPM) solutions.
    • Your organization has attained a moderate level of PPM maturity.
    • You have sufficient financial and technical resources to purchase a commercial PPM solution.
    • There is a wide variety of commercial PPM solutions; different kinds of PPM solutions are more appropriate for organizations of a certain size and a certain PPM maturity level than others.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Implementations of PPM solutions are often unsuccessful resulting in wasted time and resources; failing to achieve sustainable adoption of the tool is a widespread pain point.
    • The costs of PPM solutions do not end after the implementation and subscription invoices are paid. Have realistic expectations about the time required to use and maintain PPM solutions to ensure success.
    • PPM solutions help PMOs serve the organization’s core decision makers. Success depends on improved service to these stakeholders.

    Impact and Result

    • Using Info-Tech’s Vendor Landscape and PPM solution use cases, you will be able to make sense of the diversity of PPM solutions available in today’s market and choose the most appropriate solution for your organization’s size and level of PPM maturity.
    • Info-Tech’s blueprint for a PPM solution selection and implementation project will provide you with a variety of tools and templates.
    • A carefully planned out and executed selection and implementation process will help ensure your organization can maximize the value of your project portfolio and will allow the PMO to improve portfolio stakeholder satisfaction.

    Select and Implement an IT PPM Solution Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should implement a commercial PPM solution, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Launch the PPM solution project and collect requirements

    Create a PPM solution selection and implementation project charter and gather your organizations business and technical requirements.

    • Select and Implement a PPM Solution – Phase 1: Launch the PPM Solution Project and Collect Requirements
    • PPM Solution Project Charter Template
    • PPM Implementation Work Breakdown Structure
    • PPM Solution Requirements Gathering Tool
    • PPM Solution Cost-of-Use Estimation Tool
    • PPM Solution RFP Template
    • PPM Solution Success Metrics Workbook
    • PPM Solution Use-Case Fit Assessment Tool

    2. Select a PPM solution

    Select the most appropriate PPM solution for your organization by using Info-Tech’s PPM solution Vendor Landscape and use cases to help you create a vendor shortlist, produce an RFP, and establish evaluation criteria for ranking your shortlisted solutions.

    • Select and Implement a PPM Solution – Phase 2: Select a PPM Solution
    • PPM Vendor Shortlist & Detailed Feature Analysis Tool
    • PPM Solution Vendor Response Template
    • PPM Solution Evaluation & RFP Scoring Tool
    • PPM Solution Vendor Demo Script

    3. Plan the PPM solution implementation

    Plan a PPM solution implementation that will result in long-term sustainable adoption of the tool and that will allow the PMO to meet the needs of core project portfolio stakeholders.

    • Select and Implement a PPM Solution – Phase 3: Plan the PPM Solution Implementation
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Select and Implement an IT PPM Solution

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Launch the PPM Solution Project and Gather Requirements

    The Purpose

    Create a PPM solution selection and implementation project charter.

    Gather the business and technical requirements for the PPM solution.

    Establish clear and measurable success criteria for your PPM solution project.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Comprehensive project plan

    Comprehensive and organized record of the various PPM solution requirements

    A record of PPM solution project goals and criteria that can be used in the future to establish the success of the project

    Activities

    1.1 Brainstorm, refine, and prioritize your PPM solution needs

    1.2 Stakeholder identification exercise

    1.3 Project charter work session

    1.4 Requirements gathering work session

    1.5 PPM solution success metrics workbook session

    Outputs

    High-level outline of PPM solution requirements

    Stakeholder consultation plan

    A draft project charter and action plan to fill in project charter gaps

    A draft requirements workbook and action plan to fill in requirement gathering gaps

    A PPM project success metrics workbook that can be used during and after the project

    2 Select a PPM Solution

    The Purpose

    Identify the PPM solutions that are most appropriate for your organization’s size and level of PPM maturity.

    Create a PPM solution and vendor shortlist.

    Create a request for proposal (RFP).

    Create a PPM solution scoring and evaluation tool.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Knowledge of the PPM solution market and the various features available

    An informed shortlist of PPM vendors

    An organized and focused method for evaluating the often long and complex responses to the RFP that vendors provide

    The groundwork for an informed and defensible selection of a PPM solution for your organization

    Activities

    2.1 Assess the size of your organization and the level of PPM maturity to select the most appropriate use case

    2.2 PPM solution requirements and criteria ranking activity

    2.3 An RFP working session

    2.4 Build an RFP evaluation tool

    Outputs

    Identification of the most appropriate use case in Info-Tech’s Vendor Landscape

    A refined and organized list of the core features that will be included in the RFP

    A draft RFP with an action plan to fill in any RFP gaps

    An Excel tool that can be used to compare and evaluate vendors’ responses to the RFP

    3 Prepare for the PPM Solution Implementation

    The Purpose

    To think ahead to the eventual implementation of the solution that will occur once the selection phase is completed

    Key Benefits Achieved

    An understanding of key insights and steps that will help avoid mistakes resulting in poor adoption or PPM solutions that end up producing little tangible value

    Activities

    3.1 Outline high-level implementation stages

    3.2 Organizational change management strategy session

    3.3 A PPM project success metrics planning session

    Outputs

    High-level implementation tasks and milestones

    A RACI chart for core implementation tasks

    A high-level PPM solution implementation organizational change management strategy

    A RACI chart for core organizational change management tasks related to the PPM solution implementation

    A PPM project success metrics schedule and plan

    Mergers & Acquisitions: The Buy Blueprint

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}325|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: 5 Average Days Saved
    • member rating average days saved: After each Info-Tech experience, we ask our members to quantify the real-time savings, monetary impact, and project improvements our research helped them achieve.
    • Parent Category Name: IT Strategy
    • Parent Category Link: /it-strategy

    There are four key scenarios or entry points for IT as the acquiring organization in M&As:

    • IT can suggest an acquisition to meet the business objectives of the organization.
    • IT is brought in to strategy plan the acquisition from both the business’ and IT’s perspectives.
    • IT participates in due diligence activities and valuates the organization potentially being acquired.
    • IT needs to reactively prepare its environment to enable the integration.

    Consider the ideal scenario for your IT organization.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    Acquisitions are inevitable in modern business, and IT’s involvement in the process should be too. This progression is inspired by:

    • The growing trend for organizations to increase, decrease, or evolve through these types of transactions.
    • A maturing business perspective of IT, preventing the difficulty that IT is faced with when invited into the transaction process late.
    • Transactions that are driven by digital motivations, requiring IT’s expertise.
    • There never being such a thing as a true merger, making the majority of M&A activity either acquisitions or divestitures.

    Impact and Result

    Prepare for a growth/integration transaction by:

    • Recognizing the trend for organizations to engage in M&A activity and the increased likelihood that, as an IT leader, you will be involved in a transaction in your career.
    • Creating a standard strategy that will enable strong program management.
    • Properly considering all the critical components of the transaction and integration by prioritizing tasks that will reduce risk, deliver value, and meet stakeholder expectations.

    Mergers & Acquisitions: The Buy Blueprint Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out how your organization can excel its growth strategy by engaging in M&A transactions. Review Info-Tech’s methodology and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Proactive Phase

    Be an innovative IT leader by suggesting how and why the business should engage in an acquisition or divestiture.

    • One-Pager: M&A Proactive
    • Case Study: M&A Proactive
    • Information Asset Audit Tool
    • Data Valuation Tool
    • Enterprise Integration Process Mapping Tool
    • Risk Register Tool
    • Security M&A Due Diligence Tool

    2. Discovery & Strategy

    Create a standardized approach for how your IT organization should address acquisitions.

    • One-Pager: M&A Discovery & Strategy – Buy
    • Case Study: M&A Discovery & Strategy – Buy

    3. Due Diligence & Preparation

    Evaluate the target organizations to minimize risk and have an established integration project plan.

    • One-Pager: M&A Due Diligence & Preparation – Buy
    • Case Study: M&A Due Diligence & Preparation – Buy
    • IT Due Diligence Charter
    • Technical Debt Business Impact Analysis Tool
    • IT Culture Diagnostic
    • M&A Integration Project Management Tool (SharePoint)
    • SharePoint Template: Step-by-Step Deployment Guide
    • M&A Integration Project Management Tool (Excel)
    • Resource Management Supply-Demand Calculator

    4. Execution & Value Realization

    Deliver on the integration project plan successfully and communicate IT’s transaction value to the business.

    • One-Pager: M&A Execution & Value Realization – Buy
    • Case Study: M&A Execution & Value Realization – Buy

    Infographic

    Workshop: Mergers & Acquisitions: The Buy Blueprint

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Pre-Transaction Discovery & Strategy

    The Purpose

    Establish the transaction foundation.

    Discover the motivation for acquiring.

    Formalize the program plan.

    Create the valuation framework.

    Strategize the transaction and finalize the M&A strategy and approach.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    All major stakeholders are on the same page.

    Set up crucial elements to facilitate the success of the transaction.

    Have a repeatable transaction strategy that can be reused for multiple organizations.

    Activities

    1.1 Conduct the CIO Business Vision and CEO-CIO Alignment Diagnostics.

    1.2 Identify key stakeholders and outline their relationship to the M&A process.

    1.3 Identify the rationale for the company's decision to pursue an acquisition.

    1.4 Assess the IT/digital strategy.

    1.5 Identify pain points and opportunities tied to the acquisition.

    1.6 Create the IT vision and mission statements and identify IT guiding principles and the transition team.

    1.7 Document the M&A governance.

    1.8 Establish program metrics.

    1.9 Create the valuation framework.

    1.10 Establish the integration strategy.

    1.11 Conduct a RACI.

    1.12 Create the communication plan.

    1.13 Prepare to assess target organization(s).

    Outputs

    Business perspectives of IT

    Stakeholder network map for M&A transactions

    Business context implications for IT

    IT’s acquiring strategic direction

    Governance structure

    M&A program metrics

    IT valuation framework

    Integration strategy

    RACI

    Communication plan

    Prepared to assess target organization(s)

    2 Mid-Transaction Due Diligence & Preparation

    The Purpose

    Establish the transaction foundation.

    Discover the motivation for integration.

    Assess the target organization(s).

    Create the valuation framework.

    Plan the integration roadmap.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    All major stakeholders are on the same page.

    Methodology identified to assess organizations during due diligence.

    Methodology can be reused for multiple organizations.

    Integration activities are planned and assigned.

    Activities

    2.1 Gather and evaluate the stakeholders involved, M&A strategy, future-state operating model, and governance.

    2.2 Review the business rationale for the acquisition.

    2.3 Establish the integration strategy.

    2.4 Create the due diligence charter.

    2.5 Create a list of IT artifacts to be reviewed in the data room.

    2.6 Conduct a technical debt assessment.

    2.7 Assess the current culture and identify the goal culture.

    2.8 Identify the needed workforce supply.

    2.9 Create the valuation framework.

    2.10 Establish the integration roadmap.

    2.11 Establish and align project metrics with identified tasks.

    2.12 Estimate integration costs.

    Outputs

    Stakeholder map

    IT strategy assessment

    IT operating model and IT governance structure defined

    Business context implications for IT

    Integration strategy

    Due diligence charter

    Data room artifacts

    Technical debt assessment

    Culture assessment

    Workforce supply identified

    IT valuation framework

    Integration roadmap and associated resourcing

    3 Post-Transaction Execution & Value Realization

    The Purpose

    Establish the transaction foundation.

    Discover the motivation for integration.

    Plan the integration roadmap.

    Prepare employees for the transition.

    Engage in integration.

    Assess the transaction outcomes.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    All major stakeholders are on the same page.

    Integration activities are planned and assigned.

    Employees are set up for a smooth and successful transition.

    Integration strategy and roadmap executed to benefit the organization.

    Review what went well and identify improvements to be made in future transactions.

    Activities

    3.1 Identify key stakeholders and determine IT transaction team.

    3.2 Gather and evaluate the M&A strategy, future-state operating model, and governance.

    3.3 Review the business rationale for the acquisition.

    3.4 Establish the integration strategy.

    3.5 Prioritize integration tasks.

    3.6 Establish the integration roadmap.

    3.7 Establish and align project metrics with identified tasks.

    3.8 Estimate integration costs.

    3.9 Assess the current culture and identify the goal culture.

    3.10 Identify the needed workforce supply.

    3.11 Create an employee transition plan.

    3.12 Create functional workplans for employees.

    3.13 Complete the integration by regularly updating the project plan.

    3.14 Begin to rationalize the IT environment where possible and necessary.

    3.15 Confirm integration costs.

    3.16 Review IT’s transaction value.

    3.17 Conduct a transaction and integration SWOT.

    3.18 Review the playbook and prepare for future transactions.

    Outputs

    M&A transaction team

    Stakeholder map

    IT strategy assessed

    IT operating model and IT governance structure defined

    Business context implications for IT

    Integration strategy

    Integration roadmap and associated resourcing

    Culture assessment

    Workforce supply identified

    Employee transition plan

    Employee functional workplans

    Updated integration project plan

    Rationalized IT environment

    SWOT of transaction

    M&A Buy Playbook refined for future transactions

    Further reading

    Mergers & Acquisitions: The Buy Blueprint

    For IT leaders who want to have a role in the transaction process when their business is engaging in an M&A purchase.

    EXECUTIVE BRIEF

    Analyst Perspective

    Don’t wait to be invited to the M&A table, make it.

    Photo of Brittany Lutes, Research Analyst, CIO Practice, Info-Tech Research Group.
    Brittany Lutes
    Research Analyst,
    CIO Practice
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Photo of Ibrahim Abdel-Kader, Research Analyst, CIO Practice, Info-Tech Research Group.
    Ibrahim Abdel-Kader
    Research Analyst,
    CIO Practice
    Info-Tech Research Group

    IT has always been an afterthought in the M&A process, often brought in last minute once the deal is nearly, if not completely, solidified. This is a mistake. When IT is brought into the process late, the business misses opportunities to generate value related to the transaction and has less awareness of critical risks or inaccuracies.

    To prevent this mistake, IT leadership needs to develop strong business relationships and gain respect for their innovative suggestions. In fact, when it comes to modern M&A activity, IT should be the ones suggesting potential transactions to meet business needs, specifically when it comes to modernizing the business or adopting digital capabilities.

    IT needs to stop waiting to be invited to the acquisition or divestiture table. IT needs to suggest that the table be constructed and actively work toward achieving the strategic objectives of the business.

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    There are four key scenarios or entry points for IT as the acquiring organization in M&As:

    • IT can suggest an acquisition to meet the business objectives of the organization.
    • IT is brought in to strategy plan the acquisition from both the business’ and IT’s perspectives.
    • IT participates in due diligence activities and valuates the organization potentially being acquired.
    • IT needs to reactively prepare its environment to enable the integration.

    Consider the ideal scenario for your IT organization.

    Common Obstacles

    Some of the obstacles IT faces include:

    • IT is often told about the transaction once the deal has already been solidified and is now forced to meet unrealistic business demands.
    • The business does not trust IT and therefore does not approach IT to define value or reduce risks to the transaction process.
    • The people and culture element are forgotten or not given adequate priority.

    These obstacles often arise when IT waits to be invited into the transaction process and misses critical opportunities.

    Info-Tech's Approach

    Prepare for a growth/integration transaction by:

    • Recognizing the trend for organizations to engage in M&A activity and the increased likelihood that, as an IT leader, you will be involved in a transaction in your career.
    • Creating a standard strategy that will enable strong program management.
    • Properly considering all the critical components of the transaction and integration by prioritizing tasks that will reduce risk, deliver value, and meet stakeholder expectations.

    Info-Tech Insight

    As the number of merger, acquisition, and divestiture transactions continues to increase, so too does IT’s opportunity to leverage the growing digital nature of these transactions and get involved at the onset.

    The changing M&A landscape

    Businesses will embrace more digital M&A transactions in the post-pandemic world

    • When the pandemic occurred, businesses reacted by either pausing (61%) or completely cancelling (46%) deals that were in the mid-transaction state (Deloitte, 2020). The uncertainty made many organizations consider whether the risks would be worth the potential benefits.
    • However, many organizations quickly realized the pandemic is not a hindrance to M&A transactions but an opportunity. Over 16,000 American companies were involved in M&A transactions in the first six months of 2021 (The Economist). For reference, this had been averaging around 10,000 per six months from 2016 to 2020.
    • In addition to this transaction growth, organizations have increasingly been embracing digital. These trends increase the likelihood that, as an IT leader, you will engage in an M&A transaction. However, it is up to you when you get involved in the transactions.

    The total value of transactions in the year after the pandemic started was $1.3 billion – a 93% increase in value compared to before the pandemic. (Nasdaq)

    Virtual deal-making will be the preferred method of 55% of organizations in the post-pandemic world. (Wall Street Journal, 2020)

    Your challenge

    IT is often not involved in the M&A transaction process. When it is, it’s often too late.

    • The most important driver of an acquisition is the ability to access new technology (DLA Piper), and yet 50% of the time, IT isn’t involved in the M&A transaction at all (IMAA Institute, 2017).
    • Additionally, IT’s lack of involvement in the process negatively impacts the business:
      • Most organizations (60%) do not have a standardized approach to integration (Steeves and Associates).
      • Weak integration teams contribute to the failure of 70% of M&A integrations (The Wall Street Journal, 2019).
      • Less than half (47%) of organizations actually experience the positive results sought by the M&A transaction (Steeves and Associates).
    • Organizations pursuing M&A and not involving IT are setting themselves up for failure.

    Only half of M&A deals involve IT (Source: IMAA Institute, 2017)

    Common Obstacles

    These barriers make this challenge difficult to address for many organizations:

    • IT is rarely afforded the opportunity to participate in the transaction deal. When IT is invited, this often happens later in the process where integration will be critical to business continuity.
    • IT has not had the opportunity to demonstrate that it is a valuable business partner in other business initiatives.
    • One of the most critical elements that IT often doesn’t take the time or doesn’t have the time to focus on is the people and leadership component.
    • IT waits to be invited to the process rather then actively involving themselves and suggesting how value can be added to the process.

    In hindsight, it’s clear to see: Involving IT is just good business.

    47% of senior leaders wish they would have spent more time on IT due diligence to prevent value erosion. (Source: IMAA Institute, 2017)

    40% of acquiring businesses discovered a cybersecurity problem at an acquisition.” (Source: Okta)

    Info-Tech's approach

    Acquisitions & Divestitures Framework

    Acquisitions and divestitures are inevitable in modern business, and IT’s involvement in the process should be too. This progression is inspired by:

    1. The growing trend for organizations to increase, decrease, or evolve through these types of transactions.
    2. Transactions that are driven by digital motivations, requiring IT’s expertise.
    3. A maturing business perspective of IT, preventing the difficulty that IT is faced with when invited into the transaction process late.
    4. There never being such a thing as a true merger, making the majority of M&A activity either acquisitions or divestitures.
    A diagram highlighting the 'IT Executives' Role in Acquisitions and Divestitures' when they are integrated at different points in the 'Core Business Timeline'. There are four main entry points 'Proactive', 'Discovery and Strategy', 'Due Diligence and Preparation', and 'Execution and Value Realized'. It is highlighted that IT can and should start at 'Proactive', but most organizations start at 'Execution and Value Realized'. 'Proactive': suggest opportunities to evolve the organization; prove IT's value and engage in growth opportunities early. Innovators start here. Steps of the business timeline in 'Proactive' are 'Organization strategies are defined' and 'M and A is considered to enable strategy'. After a buy or sell transaction is initiated is 'Discovery and Strategy': pre-transaction state. If it is a Buy transaction, 'Establish IT's involvement and approach'. If it is a Sell transaction, 'Prepare to engage in negotiations'. Business Partners start here. Steps of the business timeline in 'Discovery and Strategy' are 'Searching criteria is set', 'Potential candidates are considered', and 'LOI is sent/received'. 'Due Diligence and Preparation': mid-transaction state. If it is a Buy transaction, 'Identify potential transaction benefits and risks'. If it is a Sell transaction, 'Comply, communicate, and collaborate in transaction'. Trusted Operators start here. Steps of the business timeline in 'Due Diligence and Preparation' are 'Due diligence engagement occurs', 'Final agreement is reached', and 'Preparation for transaction execution occurs'. 'Execution and Value Realization': post-transaction state. If it is a Buy transaction, 'Integrate the IT environments and achieve business value'. If it is a Sell transaction, 'Separate the IT environment and deliver on transaction terms'. Firefighters start here. Steps of the business timeline in 'Execution and Value Realization' are 'Staff and operations are addressed appropriately', 'Day 1 of implementation and integration activities occurs', '1st 100 days of new entity state occur' and 'Ongoing risk mitigating and value creating activities occur'.

    The business’ view of IT will impact how soon IT can get involved

    There are four key entry points for IT

    A colorful visualization of the four key entry points for IT and a fifth not-so-key entry point. Starting from the top: 'Innovator', Information and Technology as a Competitive Advantage, 90% Satisfaction; 'Business Partner', Effective Delivery of Strategic Business Projects, 80% Satisfaction; 'Trusted Operator', Enablement of Business Through Application and Work Orders, 70% Satisfaction; 'Firefighter', Reliable Infrastructure and IT Service Desk, 60% Satisfaction; and then 'Unstable', Inability to Consistently Deliver Basic Services, <60% Satisfaction.
    1. Innovator: IT suggests an acquisition to meet the business objectives of the organization.
    2. Business Partner: IT is brought in to strategy plan the acquisition from both the business’ and IT’s perspective.
    3. Trusted Operator: IT participates in due diligence activities and valuates the organization potentially being acquired.
    4. Firefighter: IT reactively engages in the integration with little time to prepare.

    Merger, acquisition, and divestiture defined

    Merger

    A merger looks at the equal combination of two entities or organizations. Mergers are rare in the M&A space, as the organizations will combine assets and services in a completely equal 50/50 split. Two organizations may also choose to divest business entities and merge as a new company.

    Acquisition

    The most common transaction in the M&A space, where an organization will acquire or purchase another organization or entities of another organization. This type of transaction has a clear owner who will be able to make legal decisions regarding the acquired organization.

    Divestiture

    An organization may decide to sell partial elements of a business to an acquiring organization. They will separate this business entity from the rest of the organization and continue to operate the other components of the business.

    Info-Tech Insight

    A true merger does not exist, as there is always someone initiating the discussion. As a result, most M&A activity falls into acquisition or divestiture categories.

    Buying vs. selling

    The M&A process approach differs depending on whether you are the executive IT leader on the buy side or sell side

    This blueprint is only focused on the buy side:

    • More than two organizations could be involved in a transaction.
    • Examples of buy-related scenarios include:
      • Your organization is buying another organization with the intent of having the purchased organization keep its regular staff, operations, and location. This could mean minimal integration is required.
      • Your organization is buying another organization in its entirety with the intent of integrating it into your original company.
      • Your organization is buying components of another organization with the intent of integrating them into your original company.
    • As the purchasing organization, you will probably be initiating the purchase and thus will be valuating the selling organization during due diligence and leading the execution plan.

    The sell side is focused on:

    • Examples of sell-related scenarios include:
      • Your organization is selling to another organization with the intent of keeping its regular staff, operations, and location. This could mean minimal separation is required.
      • Your organization is selling to another organization with the intent of separating to be a part of the purchasing organization.
      • Your organization is engaging in a divestiture with the intent of:
        • Separating components to be part of the purchasing organization permanently.
        • Separating components to be part of a spinoff and establish a unit as a standalone new company.
    • As the selling organization, you could proactively seek out suitors to purchase all or components of your organization, or you could be approached by an organization.

    For more information on divestitures or selling your entire organization, check out Info-Tech’s Mergers & Acquisitions: The Sell Blueprint.

    Core business timeline

    For IT to be valuable in M&As, you need to align your deliverables and your support to the key activities the business and investors are working on.

    Info-Tech’s methodology for Buying Organizations in Mergers, Acquisitions, or Divestitures

    1. Proactive

    2. Discovery & Strategy

    3. Due Diligence & Preparation

    4. Execution & Value Realization

    Phase Steps

    1. Identify Stakeholders and Their Perspective of IT
    2. Assess IT’s Current Value and Future State
    3. Drive Innovation and Suggest Growth Opportunities
    1. Establish the M&A Program Plan
    2. Prepare IT to Engage in the Acquisition
    1. Assess the Target Organization
    2. Prepare to Integrate
    1. Execute the Transaction
    2. Reflection and Value Realization

    Phase Outcomes

    Be an innovative IT leader by suggesting how and why the business should engage in an acquisition or divestiture.

    Create a standardized approach for how your IT organization should address acquisitions.

    Evaluate the target organizations successfully and establish an integration project plan.

    Deliver on the integration project plan successfully and communicate IT’s transaction value to the business.

    Potential metrics for each phase

    1. Proactive

    2. Discovery & Strategy

    3. Due Diligence & Preparation

    4. Execution & Value Realization

    • % Share of business innovation spend from overall IT budget
    • % Critical processes with approved performance goals and metrics
    • % IT initiatives that meet or exceed value expectation defined in business case
    • % IT initiatives aligned with organizational strategic direction
    • % Satisfaction with IT's strategic decision-making abilities
    • $ Estimated business value added through IT-enabled innovation
    • % Overall stakeholder satisfaction with IT
    • % Percent of business leaders that view IT as an Innovator
    • % IT budget as a percent of revenue
    • % Assets that are not allocated
    • % Unallocated software licenses
    • # Obsolete assets
    • % IT spend that can be attributed to the business (chargeback or showback)
    • % Share of CapEx of overall IT budget
    • % Prospective organizations that meet the search criteria
    • $ Total IT cost of ownership (before and after M&A, before and after rationalization)
    • % Business leaders that view IT as a Business Partner
    • % Defects discovered in production
    • $ Cost per user for enterprise applications
    • % In-house-built applications vs. enterprise applications
    • % Owners identified for all data domains
    • # IT staff asked to participate in due diligence
    • Change to due diligence
    • IT budget variance
    • Synergy target
    • % Satisfaction with the effectiveness of IT capabilities
    • % Overall end-customer satisfaction
    • $ Impact of vendor SLA breaches
    • $ Savings through cost-optimization efforts
    • $ Savings through application rationalization and technology standardization
    • # Key positions empty
    • % Frequency of staff turnover
    • % Emergency changes
    • # Hours of unplanned downtime
    • % Releases that cause downtime
    • % Incidents with identified problem record
    • % Problems with identified root cause
    • # Days from problem identification to root cause fix
    • % Projects that consider IT risk
    • % Incidents due to issues not addressed in the security plan
    • # Average vulnerability remediation time
    • % Application budget spent on new build/buy vs. maintenance (deferred feature implementation, enhancements, bug fixes)
    • # Time (days) to value realization
    • % Projects that realized planned benefits
    • $ IT operational savings and cost reductions that are related to synergies/divestitures
    • % IT staff–related expenses/redundancies
    • # Days spent on IT integration
    • $ Accurate IT budget estimates
    • % Revenue growth directly tied to IT delivery
    • % Profit margin growth

    The IT executive’s role in the buying transaction is critical

    And IT leaders have a greater likelihood than ever of needing to support a merger, acquisition, or divestiture.

    1. Reduced Risk

      IT can identify risks that may go unnoticed when IT is not involved.
    2. Increased Accuracy

      The business can make accurate predictions around the costs, timelines, and needs of IT.
    3. Faster Integration

      Faster integration means faster value realization for the business.
    4. Informed Decision Making

      IT leaders hold critical information that can support the business in moving the transaction forward.
    5. Innovation

      IT can suggest new opportunities to generate revenue, optimize processes, or reduce inefficiencies.

    The IT executive’s critical role is demonstrated by:

    • Reduced Risk

      47% of senior leaders wish they would have spent more time on IT due diligence to prevent value erosion (IMAA Institute, 2017).
    • Increased Accuracy

      87% of respondents to a Deloitte survey effectively conducted a virtual deal, with a focus on cybersecurity and integration (Deloitte, 2020).
    • Faster Integration

      Integration costs range from as low as $4 million to as high as $3.8 billion, making the process an investment for the organization (CIO Dive).
    • Informed Decision Making

      Only 38% of corporate and 22% of private equity firms include IT as a significant aspect in their transaction approach (IMAA Institute, 2017).
    • Innovation

      Successful CIOs involved in M&As can spend 70% of their time on aspects outside of IT and 30% of their time on technology and delivery (CIO).

    Playbook benefits

    IT Benefits

    • IT will be seen as an innovative partner to the business, and its suggestions and involvement in the organization will lead to benefits, not hindrances.
    • Develop a streamlined method to valuate the potential organization being purchased and ensure risk management concerns are brought to the business’ attention immediately.
    • Create a comprehensive list of items that IT needs to do during the integration that can be prioritized and actioned.

    Business Benefits

    • The business will get accurate and relevant information about the organization being acquired, ensuring that the anticipated value of the transaction is correctly planned for.
    • Fewer business interruptions will happen, because IT can accurately plan for and execute the high-priority integration tasks.
    • The business can make a fair offer to the purchased organization, having properly valuated all aspects being bought, including the IT environment.

    Insight summary

    Overarching Insight

    As an IT executive, take control of when you get involved in a growth transaction. Do this by proactively identifying acquisition targets, demonstrating the value of IT, and ensuring that integration of IT environments does not lead to unnecessary and costly decisions.

    Proactive Insight

    CIOs on the forefront of digital transformation need to actively look for and suggest opportunities to acquire or partner on new digital capabilities to respond to rapidly changing business needs.

    Discovery & Strategy Insight

    IT organizations that have an effective M&A program plan are more prepared for the buying transaction, enabling a successful outcome. A structured strategy is particularly necessary for organizations expected to deliver M&As rapidly and frequently.

    Due Diligence & Preparation Insight

    Most IT synergies can be realized in due diligence. It is more impactful to consider IT processes and practices (e.g. contracts and culture) in due diligence rather than later in the integration.

    Execution & Value Realization Insight

    IT needs to realize synergies within the first 100 days of integration. The most successful transactions are when IT continuously realizes synergies a year after the transaction and beyond.

    Blueprint deliverables

    Key Deliverable: M&A Buy Playbook

    The M&A Buy Playbook should be a reusable document that enables your IT organization to successfully deliver on any acquisition transaction.

    Screenshots of the 'M and A Buy Playbook' deliverable.

    M&A Buy One-Pager

    See a one-page overview of each phase of the transaction.

    Screenshots of the 'M and A Buy One-Pagers' deliverable.

    M&A Buy Case Studies

    Read a one-page case study for each phase of the transaction.

    Screenshots of the 'M and A Buy Case Studies' deliverable.

    M&A Integration Project Management Tool (SharePoint)

    Manage the integration process of the acquisition using this SharePoint template.

    Screenshots of the 'M and A Integration Project Management Tool (SharePoint)' deliverable.

    M&A Integration Project Management Tool (Excel)

    Manage the integration process of the acquisition using this Excel tool if you can’t or don’t want to use SharePoint.

    Screenshots of the 'M and A Integration Project Management Tool (Excel)' deliverable.

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    Guided Implementation

    Workshop

    Consulting

    "Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful." "Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track." "We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place." "Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project."

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

    Guided Implementation

    What does a typical GI on this topic look like?

    A Guided Implementation (GI) is a series of calls with an Info-Tech analyst to help implement our best practices in your organization.

    A typical GI is between 6 to 10 calls over the course of 2 to 4 months.

      Proactive Phase

    • Call #1: Scope requirements, objectives, and your specific challenges.
    • Discovery & Strategy Phase

    • Call #2: Determine stakeholders and their perspectives of IT.
    • Call #3: Identify how M&A could support business strategy and how to communicate.
    • Due Diligence & Preparation Phase

    • Call #4: Establish a transaction team and acquisition strategic direction.
    • Call #5: Create program metrics and identify a standard integration strategy.
    • Call #6: Assess the potential organization(s).
    • Call #7: Identify the integration program plan.
    • Execution & Value Realization Phase

    • Call #8: Establish employee transitions to retain key staff.
    • Call #9: Assess IT’s ability to deliver on the acquisition transaction.

    The Buy Blueprint

    Phase 1

    Proactive

    Phase 1

    Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4
    • 1.1 Identify Stakeholders and Their Perspective of IT
    • 1.2 Assess IT’s Current Value and Future State
    • 1.3 Drive Innovation and Suggest Growth Opportunities
    • 2.1 Establish the M&A Program Plan
    • 2.2 Prepare IT to Engage in the Acquisition
    • 3.1 Assess the Target Organization
    • 3.2 Prepare to Integrate
    • 4.1 Execute the Transaction
    • 4.2 Reflection and Value Realization

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Conduct the CEO-CIO Alignment diagnostic
    • Conduct the CIO Business Vision diagnostic
    • Visualize relationships among stakeholders to identify key influencers
    • Group stakeholders into categories
    • Prioritize your stakeholders
    • Plan to communicate
    • Valuate IT
    • Assess the IT/digital strategy
    • Determine pain points and opportunities
    • Align goals to opportunities
    • Recommend growth opportunities

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • IT and business leadership

    What is the Proactive phase?

    Embracing the digital drivers

    As the number of merger, acquisition, or divestiture transactions driven by digital means continues to increase, IT has an opportunity to not just be involved in a transaction but actively seek out potential deals.

    In the Proactive phase, the business is not currently considering a transaction. However, the business could consider one to reach its strategic goals. IT organizations that have developed respected relationships with the business leaders can suggest these potential transactions.

    Understand the business’ perspective of IT, determine who the critical M&A stakeholders are, valuate the IT environment, and examine how it supports the business goals in order to suggest an M&A transaction.

    In doing so, IT isn’t waiting to be invited to the transaction table – it’s creating it.

    Goal: To support the organization in reaching its strategic goals by suggesting M&A activities that will enable the organization to reach its objectives faster and with greater-value outcomes.

    Proactive Prerequisite Checklist

    Before coming into the Proactive phase, you should have addressed the following:

    • Understand what mergers, acquisitions, and divestitures are.
    • Understand what mergers, acquisitions, and divestitures mean for the business.
    • Understand what mergers, acquisitions, and divestitures mean for IT.

    Review the Executive Brief for more information on mergers, acquisitions, and divestitures for purchasing organizations.

    Proactive

    Step 1.1

    Identify M&A Stakeholders and Their Perspective of IT

    Activities

    • 1.1.1 Conduct the CEO-CIO Alignment diagnostic
    • 1.1.2 Conduct the CIO Business Vision diagnostic
    • 1.1.3 Visualize relationships among stakeholders to identify key influencers
    • 1.1.4 Group stakeholders into categories
    • 1.1.5 Prioritize your stakeholders
    • 1.16 Plan to communicate

    This step involves the following participants:

    • IT executive leader
    • IT leadership
    • Critical M&A stakeholders

    Outcomes of Step

    Understand how the business perceives IT and establish strong relationships with critical M&A stakeholders.

    Business executives' perspectives of IT

    Leverage diagnostics and gain alignment on IT’s role in the organization

    • To suggest or get involved with a merger, acquisition, or divestiture, the IT executive leader needs to be well respected by other members of the executive leadership team and the business.
    • Specifically, the Proactive phase relies on the IT organization being viewed as an Innovator within the business.
    • Identify how the CEO/business executive currently views IT and where they would like IT to move within the Maturity Ladder.
    • Additionally, understand how other critical department leaders view IT and how they view the partnership with IT.
    A colorful visualization titled 'Maturity Ladder' detailing levels of IT function that a business may choose from based on the business executives' perspectives of IT. Starting from the bottom: 'Struggle', Does not embarrass, Does not crash; 'Support', Keeps business happy, Keeps costs low; 'Optimize', Increases efficiency, Decreases costs; 'Expand', Extends into new business, Generates revenue; 'Transform', Creates new industry.

    Misalignment in target state requires further communication between the CIO and CEO to ensure IT is striving toward an agreed-upon direction.

    Info-Tech’s CIO Business Vision (CIO BV) diagnostic measures a variety of high-value metrics to provide a well-rounded understanding of stakeholder satisfaction with IT.

    Sample of Info-Tech's CIO Business Vision diagnostic measuring percentages of high-value metrics like 'IT Satisfaction' and 'IT Value' regarding business leader satisfaction. A note for these two reads 'Evaluate business leader satisfaction with IT this year and last year'. A section titled 'Relationship' has metrics such as 'Understands Needs' and 'Trains Effectively'. A note for this section reads 'Examine indicators of the relationship between IT and the business'. A section titled 'Security Friction' has metrics such as 'Regulatory Compliance-Driven' and 'Office/Desktop Security'.

    Business Satisfaction and Importance for Core Services

    The core services of IT are important when determining what IT should focus on. The most important services with the lowest satisfaction offer the largest area of improvement for IT to drive business value.

    Sample of Info-Tech's CIO Business Vision diagnostic specifically comparing the business satisfaction of 12 core services with their importance. Services listed include 'Service Desk', 'IT Security', 'Requirements Gathering', 'Business Apps', 'Data Quality', and more. There is a short description of the services, a percentage for the business satisfaction with the service, a percentage comparing it to last year, and a numbered ranking of importance for each service. A note reads 'Assess satisfaction and importance across 12 core IT capabilities'.

    1.1.1 Conduct the CEO-CIO Alignment diagnostic

    2 weeks

    Input: IT organization expertise and the CEO-CIO Alignment diagnostic

    Output: An understanding of an executive business stakeholder’s perception of IT

    Materials: CEO-CIO Alignment diagnostic, M&A Buy Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, Business executive/CEO

    1. The CEO-CIO Alignment diagnostic can be a powerful input. Speak with your Info-Tech account representative to conduct the diagnostic. Use the results to inform current IT capabilities.
    2. You may choose to debrief the results of your diagnostic with an Info-Tech analyst. We recommend this to help your team understand how to interpret and draw conclusions from the results.
    3. Examine the results of the survey and note where there might be specific capabilities that could be improved.
    4. Determine whether there are any areas of significant disagreement between the you and the CEO. Mark down those areas for further conversations. Additionally, take note of areas that could be leveraged to support growth transactions or support your rationale in recommending growth transactions.

    Download the sample report.

    Record the results in the M&A Buy Playbook.

    1.1.2 Conduct the CIO Business Vision diagnostic

    2 weeks

    Input: IT organization expertise, CIO BV diagnostic

    Output: An understanding of business stakeholder perception of certain IT capabilities and services

    Materials: CIO Business Vision diagnostic, Computer, Whiteboard and markers, M&A Buy Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, Senior business leaders

    1. The CIO Business Vision (CIO BV) diagnostic can be a powerful tool for identifying IT capability focus areas. Speak with your account representative to conduct the CIO BV diagnostic. Use the results to inform current IT capabilities.
    2. You may choose to debrief the results of your diagnostic with an Info-Tech analyst. We recommend this to help your team understand how to interpret the results and draw conclusions from the diagnostic.
    3. Examine the results of the survey and take note of any IT services that have low scores.
    4. Read through the diagnostic comments and note any common themes. Especially note which stakeholders identified they have a favorable relationship with IT and which stakeholders identified they have an unfavorable relationship. For those who have an unfavorable relationship, identify if they will have a critical role in a growth transaction.

    Download the sample report.

    Record the results in the M&A Buy Playbook.

    Create a stakeholder network map for M&A transactions

    Follow the trail of breadcrumbs from your direct stakeholders to their influencers to uncover hidden stakeholders.

    Example:

    Diagram of stakeholders and their relationships with other stakeholders, such as 'Board Members', 'CFO/Finance', 'Compliance', etc. with 'CIO/IT Leader' highlighted in the middle. There are unidirectional black arrows and bi-directional green arrows indicating each connection.

      Legend
    • Black arrows indicate the direction of professional influence
    • Dashed green arrows indicate bidirectional, informal influence relationships

    Info-Tech Insight

    Your stakeholder map defines the influence landscape that the M&A transaction will occur within. This will identify who holds various levels of accountability and decision-making authority when a transaction does take place.

    Use connectors to determine who may be influencing your direct stakeholders. They may not have any formal authority within the organization, but they may have informal yet substantial relationships with your stakeholders.

    1.1.3 Visualize relationships among stakeholders to identify key influencers

    1-3 hours

    Input: List of M&A stakeholders

    Output: Relationships among M&A stakeholders and influencers

    Materials: M&A Buy Playbook

    Participants: IT executive leadership

    1. The purpose of this activity is to list all the stakeholders within your organization that will have a direct or indirect impact on the M&A transaction.
    2. Determine the critical stakeholders, and then determine the stakeholders of your stakeholders and consider adding each of them to the stakeholder list.
    3. Assess who has either formal or informal influence over your stakeholders; add these influencers to your stakeholder list.
    4. Construct a diagram linking stakeholders and their influencers together.
      • Use black arrows to indicate the direction of professional influence.
      • Use dashed green arrows to indicate bidirectional, informal influence relationships.

    Record the results in the M&A Buy Playbook.

    Categorize your stakeholders with a prioritization map

    A stakeholder prioritization map helps IT leaders categorize their stakeholders by their level of influence and ownership in the merger, acquisition, or divestiture process.

    A prioritization map of stakeholder categories split into four quadrants. The vertical axis is 'Influence', from low on the bottom to high on top. The horizontal axis is 'Ownership/Interest', from low on the left to high on the right. 'Spectators' are low influence, low ownership/interest. 'Mediators' are high influence, low ownership/interest. 'Noisemakers' are low influence, high ownership/interest. 'Players' are high influence, high ownership/interest.

    There are four areas in the map, and the stakeholders within each area should be treated differently.

    Players – players have a high interest in the initiative and the influence to effect change over the initiative. Their support is critical, and a lack of support can cause significant impediment to the objectives.

    Mediators – mediators have a low interest but significant influence over the initiative. They can help to provide balance and objective opinions to issues that arise.

    Noisemakers – noisemakers have low influence but high interest. They tend to be very vocal and engaged, either positively or negatively, but have little ability to enact their wishes.

    Spectators – generally, spectators are apathetic and have little influence over or interest in the initiative.

    1.1.4 Group stakeholders into categories

    30 minutes

    Input: Stakeholder map, Stakeholder list

    Output: Categorization of stakeholders and influencers

    Materials: Flip charts, Markers, Sticky notes, M&A Buy Playbook

    Participants: IT executive leadership, Stakeholders

    1. Identify your stakeholders’ interest in and influence on the M&A process as high, medium, or low by rating the attributes below.
    2. Map your results to the model to the right to determine each stakeholder’s category.

    Same prioritization map of stakeholder categories as before. This one has specific stakeholders mapped onto it. 'CFO' is mapped as low interest and middling influence, between 'Mediator' and 'Spectator'. 'CIO' is mapped as higher than average interest and high influence, a 'Player'. 'Board Member' is mapped as high interest and high influence, a 'Player'.

    Level of Influence
    • Power: Ability of a stakeholder to effect change.
    • Urgency: Degree of immediacy demanded.
    • Legitimacy: Perceived validity of stakeholder’s claim.
    • Volume: How loud their “voice” is or could become.
    • Contribution: What they have that is of value to you.
    Level of Interest

    How much are the stakeholder’s individual performance and goals directly tied to the success or failure of the product?

    Record the results in the M&A Buy Playbook.

    Prioritize your stakeholders

    There may be too many stakeholders to be able to manage them all. Focus your attention on the stakeholders that matter most.

    Level of Support

    Supporter

    Evangelist

    Neutral

    Blocker

    Stakeholder Category Player Critical High High Critical
    Mediator Medium Low Low Medium
    Noisemaker High Medium Medium High
    Spectator Low Irrelevant Irrelevant Low

    Consider the three dimensions for stakeholder prioritization: influence, interest, and support. Support can be determined by answering the following question: How significant is that stakeholder to the M&A or divestiture process?

    These parameters are used to prioritize which stakeholders are most important and should receive your focused attention.

    1.1.5 Prioritize your stakeholders

    30 minutes

    Input: Stakeholder matrix

    Output: Stakeholder and influencer prioritization

    Materials: Flip charts, Markers, Sticky notes, M&A Buy Playbook

    Participants: IT executive leadership, M&A/divestiture stakeholders

    1. Identify the level of support of each stakeholder by answering the following question: How significant is that stakeholder to the M&A transaction process?
    2. Prioritize your stakeholders using the prioritization scheme on the previous slide.

    Stakeholder

    Category

    Level of Support

    Prioritization

    CMO Spectator Neutral Irrelevant
    CIO Player Supporter Critical

    Record the results in the M&A Buy Playbook.

    Define strategies for engaging stakeholders by type

    A revisit to the map of stakeholder categories, but with strategies listed for each one, and arrows on the side instead of an axis. The vertical arrow is 'Authority', which increases upward, and the horizontal axis is Ownership/Interest which increases as it moves to the right. The strategy for 'Players' is 'Engage', for 'Mediators' is 'Satisfy', for 'Noisemakers' is 'Inform', and for 'Spectators' is 'Monitor'.

    Type

    Quadrant

    Actions

    Players High influence, high interest – actively engage Keep them updated on the progress of the project. Continuously involve Players in the process and maintain their engagement and interest by demonstrating their value to its success.
    Mediators High influence, low interest – keep satisfied They can be the game changers in groups of stakeholders. Turn them into supporters by gaining their confidence and trust and including them in important decision-making steps. In turn, they can help you influence other stakeholders.
    Noisemakers Low influence, high interest – keep informed Try to increase their influence (or decrease it if they are detractors) by providing them with key information, supporting them in meetings, and using Mediators to help them.
    Spectators Low influence, low interest – monitor They are followers. Keep them in the loop by providing clarity on objectives and status updates.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Each group of stakeholders draws attention and resources away from critical tasks. By properly identifying stakeholder groups, the IT executive leader can develop corresponding actions to manage stakeholders in each group. This can dramatically reduce wasted effort trying to satisfy Spectators and Noisemakers while ensuring the needs of Mediators and Players are met.

    1.1.6 Plan to communicate

    30 minutes

    Input: Stakeholder priority, Stakeholder categorization, Stakeholder influence

    Output: Stakeholder communication plan

    Materials: Flip charts, Markers, Sticky notes, M&A Buy Playbook

    Participants: IT executive leadership, M&A/divestiture stakeholders

    The purpose of this activity is to make a communication plan for each of the stakeholders identified in the previous activities, especially those who will have a critical role in the M&A transaction process.

    1. In the M&A Buy Playbook, input the type of influence each stakeholder has on IT, how they would be categorized in the M&A process, and their level of priority. Use this information to create a communication plan.
    2. Determine the methods and frequency of communication to keep the necessary stakeholder satisfied and maintain or enhance IT’s profile within the organization.

    Record the results in the M&A Buy Playbook.

    Proactive

    Step 1.2

    Assess IT’s Current Value and Method to Achieve a Future State

    Activities

    • 1.2.1 Valuate IT
    • 1.2.2 Assess the IT/digital strategy

    This step involves the following participants:

    • IT executive leader
    • IT leadership
    • Critical stakeholders to M&A

    Outcomes of Step

    Identify critical opportunities to optimize IT and meet strategic business goals through a merger, acquisition, or divestiture.

    How to valuate your IT environment

    And why it matters so much

    • Valuating your current organization’s IT environment is a critical step that all IT organizations should take, whether involved in an M&A or not, to fully understand what it might be worth.
    • The business investments in IT can be directly translated into a value amount. For every $1 invested in IT, the business might be gaining $100 in value back or possibly even loosing $100.
    • Determining, documenting, and communicating this information ensures that the business takes IT’s suggestions seriously and recognizes why investing in IT is so critical.
    • There are three ways a business or asset can be valuated:
      • Cost Approach: Look at the costs associated with building, purchasing, replacing, and maintaining a given aspect of the business.
      • Market Approach: Look at the relative value of a particular aspect of the business. Relative value can fluctuate and depends on what the markets and consequently society believe that particular element is worth.
      • Discounted Cash Flow Approach: Focus on what the potential value of the business could be or the intrinsic value anticipated due to future profitability.
    • (Source: “Valuation Methods,” Corporate Finance Institute)

    Four ways to create value through digital

    1. Reduced costs
    2. Improved customer experience
    3. New revenue sources
    4. Better decision making
    5. (Source: McKinsey & Company)

    1.2.1 Valuate IT

    1 day

    Input: Valuation of data, Valuation of applications, Valuation of infrastructure and operations, Valuation of security and risk

    Output: Valuation of IT

    Materials: Relevant templates/tools listed on the following slides, Capital budget, Operating budget, M&A Buy Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership

    The purpose of this activity is to demonstrate that IT is not simply an operational functional area that diminishes business resources. Rather, IT contributes significant value to the business.

    1. Review each of the following slides to valuate IT’s data, applications, infrastructure and operations, and security and risk. These valuations consider several tangible and intangible factors and result in a final dollar amount.
    2. Input the financial amounts identified for each critical area into a summary slide. Use this information to determine where IT is delivering value to the organization.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Consistency is key when valuating your IT organization as well as other IT organizations throughout the transaction process.

    Record the results in the M&A Buy Playbook.

    Data valuation

    Data valuation identifies how you monetize the information that your organization owns.

    Create a data value chain for your organization

    When valuating the information and data that exists in an organization, there are many things to consider.

    Info-Tech has two tools that can support this process:

    1. Information Asset Audit Tool: Use this tool first to take inventory of the different information assets that exist in your organization.
    2. Data Valuation Tool: Once information assets have been accounted for, valuate the data that exists within those information assets.

    Data Collection

    Insight Creation

    Value Creation

    Data Valuation

    01 Data Source
    02 Data Collection Method
    03 Data
    04 Data Analysis
    05 Insight
    06 Insight Delivery
    07 Consumer
    08 Value in Data
    09 Value Dimension
    10 Value Metrics Group
    11 Value Metrics
    Screenshots of Tab 2 of Info-Tech's Data Valuation Tool.

    Instructions

    1. Using the Data Valuation Tool, start gathering information based on the eight steps above to understand your organization’s journey from data to value.
    2. Identify the data value spectrum. (For example: customer sales service, citizen licensing service, etc.)
    3. Fill out the columns for data sources, data collection, and data first.
    4. Capture data analysis and related information.
    5. Then capture the value in data.
    6. Add value dimensions such as usage, quality, and economic dimensions.
      • Remember that economic value is not the only dimension, and usage/quality has a significant impact on economic value.
    7. Collect evidence to justify your data valuation calculator (market research, internal metrics, etc.).
    8. Finally, calculate the value that has a direct correlation with underlying value metrics.

    Application valuation

    Calculate the value of your IT applications

    When valuating the applications and their users in an organization, consider using a business process map. This shows how business is transacted in the company by identifying which IT applications support these processes and which business groups have access to them. Info-Tech has a business process mapping tool that can support this process:

    • Enterprise Integration Process Mapping Tool: Complete this tool first to map the different business processes to the supporting applications in your organization.

    Instructions

    1. Start by calculating user costs. This is the product of the (# of users) × (% of time spent using IT) × (fully burdened salary).
    2. Identify the revenue per employee and divide that by the average cost per employee to calculate the derived productivity ratio (DPR).
    3. Once you have calculated the user costs and DPR, multiply those total values together to get the application value.
    4. User Costs

      Total User Costs

      Derived Productivity Ratio (DPR)

      Total DPR

      Application Value

      # of users % time spent using IT Fully burdened salary Multiply values from the 3 user costs columns Revenue per employee Average cost per employee (Revenue P.E) ÷ (Average cost P.E) (User costs) X (DPR)

    5. Once the total application value is established, calculate the combined IT and business costs of delivering that value. IT and business costs include inflexibility (application maintenance), unavailability (downtime costs, including disaster exposure), IT costs (common costs statistically allocated to applications), and fully loaded cost of active (full-time equivalent [FTE]) users.
    6. Calculate the net value of applications by subtracting the total IT and business costs from the total application value calculated in step 3.
    7. IT and Business Costs

      Total IT and Business Costs

      Net Value of Applications

      Application maintenance Downtime costs (include disaster exposure) Common costs allocated to applications Fully loaded costs of active (FTE) users Sum of values from the four IT and business costs columns (Application value) – (IT and business costs)

    (Source: CSO)

    Infrastructure valuation

    Assess the foundational elements of the business’ information technology

    The purpose of this exercise is to provide a high-level infrastructure valuation that will contribute to valuating your IT environment.

    Calculating the value of the infrastructure will require different methods depending on the environment. For example, a fully cloud-hosted organization will have different costs than a fully on-premises IT environment.

    Instructions:

    1. Start by listing all of the infrastructure-related items that are relevant to your organization.
    2. Once you have finalized your items column, identify the total costs/value of each item.
      • For example, total software costs would include servers and storage.
    3. Calculate the total cost/value of your IT infrastructure by adding all of values in the right column.

    Item

    Costs/Value

    Hardware Assets Total Value +$3.2 million
    Hardware Leased/Service Agreement -$
    Software Purchased +$
    Software Leased/Service Agreement -$
    Operational Tools
    Network
    Disaster Recovery
    Antivirus
    Data Centers
    Service Desk
    Other Licenses
    Total:

    For additional support, download the M&A Runbook for Infrastructure and Operations.

    Risk and security

    Assess risk responses and calculate residual risk

    The purpose of this exercise is to provide a high-level risk assessment that will contribute to valuating your IT environment. For a more in-depth risk assessment, please refer to the Info-Tech tools below:

    1. Risk Register Tool
    2. Security M&A Due Diligence Tool

    Instructions

    1. Review the probability and impact scales below and ensure you have the appropriate criteria that align to your organization before you conduct a risk assessment.
    2. Identify the probability of occurrence and estimated financial impact for each risk category detail and fill out the table on the right. Customize the table as needed so it aligns to your organization.
    3. Probability of Risk Occurrence

      Occurrence Criteria
      (Classification; Probability of Risk Event Within One Year)

      Negligible Very Unlikely; ‹20%
      Very Low Unlikely; 20 to 40%
      Low Possible; 40 to 60%
      Moderately Low Likely; 60 to 80%
      Moderate Almost Certain; ›80%

    Note: If needed, you can customize this scale with the severity designations that you prefer. However, make sure you are always consistent with it when conducting a risk assessment.

    Financial & Reputational Impact

    Budgetary and Reputational Implications
    (Financial Impact; Reputational Impact)

    Negligible (‹$10,000; Internal IT stakeholders aware of risk event occurrence)
    Very Low ($10,000 to $25,000; Business customers aware of risk event occurrence)
    Low ($25,000 to $50,000; Board of directors aware of risk event occurrence)
    Moderately Low ($50,000 to $100,000; External customers aware of risk event occurrence)
    Moderate (›$100,000; Media coverage or regulatory body aware of risk event occurrence)

    Risk Category Details

    Probability of Occurrence

    Estimated Financial Impact

    Estimated Severity (Probability X Impact)

    Capacity Planning
    Enterprise Architecture
    Externally Originated Attack
    Hardware Configuration Errors
    Hardware Performance
    Internally Originated Attack
    IT Staffing
    Project Scoping
    Software Implementation Errors
    Technology Evaluation and Selection
    Physical Threats
    Resource Threats
    Personnel Threats
    Technical Threats
    Total:

    1.2.2 Assess the IT/digital strategy

    4 hours

    Input: IT strategy, Digital strategy, Business strategy

    Output: An understanding of an executive business stakeholder’s perception of IT, Alignment of IT/digital strategy and overall organization strategy

    Materials: Computer, Whiteboard and markers, M&A Buy Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, Business executive/CEO

    The purpose of this activity is to review the business and IT strategies that exist to determine if there are critical capabilities that are not being supported.

    Ideally, the IT and digital strategies would have been created following development of the business strategy. However, sometimes the business strategy does not directly call out the capabilities it requires IT to support.

    1. On the left half of the corresponding slide in the M&A Buy Playbook, document the business goals, initiatives, and capabilities. Input this information from the business or digital strategies. (If more space for goals, initiatives, or capabilities is needed, duplicate the slide).
    2. On the other half of the slide, document the IT goals, initiatives, and capabilities. Input this information from the IT strategy and digital strategy.

    For additional support, see Build a Business-Aligned IT Strategy.

    Record the results in the M&A Buy Playbook.

    Proactive

    Step 1.3

    Drive Innovation and Suggest Growth Opportunities

    Activities

    • 1.3.1 Determine pain points and opportunities
    • 1.3.2 Align goals with opportunities
    • 1.3.3 Recommend growth opportunities

    This step involves the following participants:

    • IT executive leader
    • IT leadership
    • Critical M&A stakeholders

    Outcomes of Step

    Establish strong relationships with critical M&A stakeholders and position IT as an innovative business partner that can suggest growth opportunities.

    1.3.1 Determine pain points and opportunities

    1-2 hours

    Input: CEO-CIO Alignment diagnostic, CIO Business Vision diagnostic, Valuation of IT environment, IT-business goals cascade

    Output: List of pain points or opportunities that IT can address

    Materials: Computer, Whiteboard and markers, M&A Buy Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Business stakeholders

    The purpose of this activity is to determine the pain points and opportunities that exist for the organization. These can be external or internal to the organization.

    1. Identify what opportunities exist for your organization. Opportunities are the potential positives that the organization would want to leverage.
    2. Next, identify pain points, which are the potential negatives that the organization would want to alleviate.
    3. Spend time considering all the options that might exist, and keep in mind what has been identified previously.

    Opportunities and pain points can be trends, other departments’ initiatives, business perspectives of IT, etc.

    Record the results in the M&A Buy Playbook.

    1.3.2 Align goals with opportunities

    1-2 hours

    Input: CEO-CIO Alignment diagnostic, CIO Business Vision diagnostic, Valuation of IT environment, IT-business goals cascade, List of pain points and opportunities

    Output: An understanding of an executive business stakeholder’s perception of IT, Foundations for growth strategy

    Materials: Computer, Whiteboard and markers, M&A Buy Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Business stakeholders

    The purpose of this activity is to determine whether a growth or separation strategy might be a good suggestion to the business in order to meet its business objectives.

    1. For the top three to five business goals, consider:
      1. Underlying drivers
      2. Digital opportunities
      3. Whether a growth or reduction strategy is the solution
    2. Just because a growth or reduction strategy is a solution for a business goal does not necessarily indicate M&A is the way to go. However, it is important to consider before you pursue suggesting M&A.

    Record the results in the M&A Buy Playbook.

    1.3.3 Recommend growth opportunities

    1-2 hours

    Input: Growth or separation strategy opportunities to support business goals, Stakeholder communication plan, Rationale for the suggestion

    Output: M&A transaction opportunities suggested

    Materials: M&A Buy Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, Business executive/CEO

    The purpose of this activity is to recommend a merger, acquisition, or divestiture to the business.

    1. Identify which of the business goals the transaction would help solve and why IT is the one to suggest such a goal.
    2. Leverage the stakeholder communication plan identified previously to give insight into stakeholders who would have a significant level of interest, influence, or support in the process.

    Info-Tech Insight

    With technology and digital driving many transactions, leverage this opening and begin the discussions with your business on how and why an acquisition would be a great opportunity.

    Record the results in the M&A Buy Playbook.

    By the end of this Proactive phase, you should:

    Be prepared to suggest M&A opportunities to support your company’s goals through growth or acquisition transactions

    Key outcome from the Proactive phase

    Develop progressive relationships and strong communication with key stakeholders to suggest or be aware of transformational opportunities that can be achieved through growth or reduction strategies such as mergers, acquisitions, or divestitures.

    Key deliverables from the Proactive phase
    • Business perspective of IT examined
    • Key stakeholders identified and relationship to the M&A process outlined
    • Ability to valuate the IT environment and communicate IT’s value to the business
    • Assessment of the business, digital, and IT strategies and how M&As could support those strategies
    • Pain points and opportunities that could be alleviated or supported through an M&A transaction
    • Acquisition or buying recommendations

    The Buy Blueprint

    Phase 2

    Discovery & Strategy

    Phase 1

    Phase 2

    Phase 3Phase 4
    • 1.1 Identify Stakeholders and Their Perspective of IT
    • 1.2 Assess IT’s Current Value and Future State
    • 1.3 Drive Innovation and Suggest Growth Opportunities
    • 2.1 Establish the M&A Program Plan
    • 2.2 Prepare IT to Engage in the Acquisition
    • 3.1 Assess the Target Organization
    • 3.2 Prepare to Integrate
    • 4.1 Execute the Transaction
    • 4.2 Reflection and Value Realization

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Create the mission and vision
    • Identify the guiding principles
    • Create the future-state operating model
    • Determine the transition team
    • Document the M&A governance
    • Create program metrics
    • Establish the integration strategy
    • Conduct a RACI
    • Create the communication plan
    • Assess the potential organization(s)

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • IT executive/CIO
    • IT senior leadership
    • Company M&A team

    Workshop Overview

    Contact your account representative for more information.
    workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8889

    Pre-Work

    Day 1

    Day 2

    Day 3

    Day 4

    Day 5

    Establish the Transaction FoundationDiscover the Motivation for AcquiringFormalize the Program PlanCreate the Valuation FrameworkStrategize the TransactionNext Steps and Wrap-Up (offsite)

    Activities

    • 0.1 Conduct the CIO Business Vision and CEO-CIO Alignment diagnostics
    • 0.2 Identify key stakeholders and outline their relationship to the M&A process
    • 0.3 Identify the rationale for the company's decisions to pursue an acquisition
    • 1.1 Review the business rationale for the acquisition
    • 1.2 Assess the IT/digital strategy
    • 1.3 Identify pain points and opportunities tied to the acquisition
    • 1.4 Create the IT vision statement, create the IT mission statement, and identify IT guiding principles
    • 2.1 Create the future-state operating model
    • 2.2 Determine the transition team
    • 2.3 Document the M&A governance
    • 2.4 Establish program metrics
    • 3.1 Valuate your data
    • 3.2 Valuate your applications
    • 3.3 Valuate your infrastructure
    • 3.4 Valuate your risk and security
    • 3.5 Combine individual valuations to make a single framework
    • 4.1 Establish the integration strategy
    • 4.2 Conduct a RACI
    • 4.3 Review best practices for assessing target organizations
    • 4.4 Create the communication plan
    • 5.1 Complete in-progress deliverables from previous four days
    • 5.2 Set up review time for workshop deliverables and to discuss next steps

    Deliverables

    1. Business perspectives of IT
    2. Stakeholder network map for M&A transactions
    1. Business context implications for IT
    2. IT’s acquisition strategic direction
    1. Operating model for future state
    2. Transition team
    3. Governance structure
    4. M&A program metrics
    1. IT valuation framework
    1. Integration strategy
    2. RACI
    3. Communication plan
    1. Completed M&A program plan and strategy
    2. Prepared to assess target organization(s)

    What is the Discovery & Strategy phase?

    Pre-transaction state

    The Discovery & Strategy phase during an acquisition is a unique opportunity for many IT organizations. IT organizations that can participate in the acquisition transaction at this stage are likely considered a strategic partner of the business.

    For one-off acquisitions, IT being invited during this stage of the process is rare. However, for organizations that are preparing to engage in many acquisitions over the coming years, this type of strategy will greatly benefit from IT involvement. Again, the likelihood of participating in an M&A transaction is increasing, making it a smart IT leadership decision to, at the very least, loosely prepare a program plan that can act as a strategic pillar throughout the transaction.

    During this phase of the pre-transaction state, IT will also be asked to participate in ensuring that the potential organization being sought will be able to meet any IT-specific search criteria that was set when the transaction was put into motion.

    Goal: To identify a repeatable program plan that IT can leverage when acquiring all or parts of another organization’s IT environment, ensuring customer satisfaction and business continuity

    Discovery & Strategy Prerequisite Checklist

    Before coming into the Discovery & Strategy phase, you should have addressed the following:

    • Understand the business perspective of IT.
    • Know the key stakeholders and have outlined their relationships to the M&A process.
    • Be able to valuate the IT environment and communicate IT's value to the business.
    • Understand the rationale for the company's decisions to pursue an acquisition and the opportunities or pain points the acquisition should address.

    Discovery & Strategy

    Step 2.1

    Establish the M&A Program Plan

    Activities

    • 2.1.1 Create the mission and vision
    • 2.1.2 Identify the guiding principles
    • 2.1.3 Create the future-state operating model
    • 2.1.4 Determine the transition team
    • 2.1.5 Document the M&A governance
    • 2.1.6 Create program metrics

    This step involves the following participants:

    • IT executive/CIO
    • IT senior leadership
    • Company M&A team

    Outcomes of Step

    Establish an M&A program plan that can be repeated across acquisitions.

    The vision and mission statements clearly articulate IT’s aspirations and purpose

    The IT vision statement communicates a desired future state of the IT organization, whereas the IT mission statement portrays the organization’s reason for being. While each serves its own purpose, they should both be derived from the business context implications for IT.

    Vision Statements

    Mission Statements

    Characteristics

    • Describe a desired future
    • Focus on ends, not means
    • Concise
    • Aspirational
    • Memorable
    • Articulate a reason for existence
    • Focus on how to achieve the vision
    • Concise
    • Easy to grasp
    • Sharply focused
    • Inspirational

    Samples

    To be a trusted advisor and partner in enabling business innovation and growth through an engaged IT workforce. (Source: Business News Daily) IT is a cohesive, proactive, and disciplined team that delivers innovative technology solutions while demonstrating a strong customer-oriented mindset. (Source: Forbes, 2013)

    2.1.1 Create the mission and vision statements

    2 hours

    Input: Business objectives, IT capabilities, Rationale for the transaction

    Output: IT’s mission and vision statements for growth strategies tied to mergers, acquisitions, and divestitures

    Materials: Flip charts/whiteboard, Markers, M&A Buy Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Company M&A team

    The purpose of this activity is to create mission and vision statements that reflect IT’s intent and method to support the organization as it pursues a growth strategy.

    1. Review the definitions and characteristics of mission and vision statements.
    2. Brainstorm different versions of the mission and vision statements.
    3. Edit the statements until you get to a single version of each that accurately reflects IT’s role in the growth process.

    Record the results in the M&A Buy Playbook.

    Guiding principles provide a sense of direction

    IT guiding principles are shared, long-lasting beliefs that guide the use of IT in constructing, transforming, and operating the enterprise by informing and restricting IT investment portfolio management, solution development, and procurement decisions.

    A diagram illustrating the place of 'IT guiding principles' in the process of making 'Decisions on the use of IT'. There are four main items, connecting lines naming the type of process in getting from one step to the next, and a line underneath clarifying the questions asked at each step. On the far left, over the question 'What decisions should be made?', is 'Business context and IT implications'. This flows forward to 'IT guiding principles', and they are connected by 'Influence'. Next, over the question 'How should decisions be made?', is the main highlighted section. 'IT guiding principles' flows forward to 'Decisions on the use of IT', and they are connected by 'Guide and inform'. On the far right, over the question 'Who has the accountability and authority to make decisions?', is 'IT policies'. This flows back to 'Decisions on the use of IT', and they are connected by 'Direct and control'.

    IT principles must be carefully constructed to make sure they are adhered to and relevant

    Info-Tech has identified a set of characteristics that IT principles should possess. These characteristics ensure the IT principles are relevant and followed in the organization.

    Approach focused. IT principles should be focused on the approach – how the organization is built, transformed, and operated – as opposed to what needs to be built, which is defined by both functional and non-functional requirements.

    Business relevant. Create IT principles that are specific to the organization. Tie IT principles to the organization’s priorities and strategic aspirations.

    Long lasting. Build IT principles that will withstand the test of time.

    Prescriptive. Inform and direct decision making with actionable IT principles. Avoid truisms, general statements, and observations.

    Verifiable. If compliance can’t be verified, people are less likely to follow the principle.

    Easily Digestible. IT principles must be clearly understood by everyone in IT and by business stakeholders. IT principles aren’t a secret manuscript of the IT team. IT principles should be succinct; wordy principles are hard to understand and remember.

    Followed. Successful IT principles represent a collection of beliefs shared among enterprise stakeholders. IT principles must be continuously communicated to all stakeholders to achieve and maintain buy-in.

    In organizations where formal policy enforcement works well, IT principles should be enforced through appropriate governance processes.

    Consider the example principles below

    IT Principle Name

    IT Principle Statement

    1. Risk Management We will ensure that the organization’s IT Risk Management Register is properly updated to reflect all potential risks and that a plan of action against those risks has been identified.
    2. Transparent Communication We will ensure employees are spoken to with respect and transparency throughout the transaction process.
    3. Integration for Success We will create an integration strategy that enables the organization and clearly communicates the resources required to succeed.
    4. Managed Data We will handle data creation, modification, integration, and use across the enterprise in compliance with our data governance policy.
    5. Establish a single IT Environment We will identify, prioritize, and manage the applications and services that IT provides in order to eliminate redundant technology and maximize the value that users and customers experience.
    6. Compliance With Laws and Regulations We will operate in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations for both our organization and the potentially purchased organization.
    7. Defined Value We will create a plan of action that aligns with the organization’s defined value expectations.
    8. Network Readiness We will ensure that employees and customers have immediate access to the network with minimal or no outages.
    9. Operating to Succeed We will bring all of IT into a central operating model within two years of the transaction.

    2.1.2 Identify the guiding principles

    2 hours

    Input: Business objectives, IT capabilities, Rationale for the transaction, Mission and vision statements

    Output: IT’s guiding principles for growth strategies tied to mergers, acquisitions, and divestitures

    Materials: Flip charts/whiteboard, Markers, M&A Buy Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Company M&A team

    The purpose of this activity is to create the guiding principles that will direct the IT organization throughout the growth strategy process.

    1. Review the role of guiding principles and the examples of guiding principles that organizations have used.
    2. Brainstorm different versions of the guiding principles. Each guiding principle should start with the phrase “We will…”
    3. Edit and consolidate the statements until you have a list of approximately eight to ten statements that accurately reflect IT’s role in the growth process.
    4. Review the guiding principles every six months to ensure they continue to support the delivery of the business’ growth strategy goals.

    Record the results in the M&A Buy Playbook.

    Create two IT teams to support the transaction

    IT M&A Transaction Team

    • The IT M&A Transaction Team should consist of the strongest members of the IT team who can be expected to deliver on unusual or additional tasks not asked of them in normal day-to-day operations.
    • The roles selected for this team will have very specific skills sets or deliver on critical integration capabilities, making their involvement in the combination of two or more IT environments paramount.
    • These individuals need to have a history of proving themselves very trustworthy, as they will likely be required to sign an NDA as well.
    • Expect to have to certain duplicate capabilities or roles across the M&A transaction team and operational team.

    IT Operational Team

    • This group is responsible for ensuring the business operations continue.
    • These employees might be those who are newer to the organization but can be counted on to deliver consistent IT services and products.
    • The roles of this team should ensure that end users or external customers remain satisfied.

    Key capabilities to support M&A

    Consider the following capabilities when looking at who should be a part of the M&A transaction team.

    Employees who have a significant role in ensuring that these capabilities are being delivered will be a top priority.

    Infrastructure

    • Systems Integration
    • Data Management

    Business Focus

    • Service-Level Management
    • Enterprise Architecture
    • Stakeholder Management
    • Project Management

    Risk & Security

    • Privacy Management
    • Security Management
    • Risk & Compliance Management

    Build a lasting and scalable operating model

    An operating model is an abstract visualization, used like an architect’s blueprint, that depicts how structures and resources are aligned and integrated to deliver on the organization’s strategy.

    It ensures consistency of all elements in the organizational structure through a clear and coherent blueprint before embarking on detailed organizational design.

    The visual should highlight which capabilities are critical to attaining strategic goals and clearly show the flow of work so that key stakeholders can understand where inputs flow in and outputs flow out of the IT organization.

    As you assess the current operating model, consider the following:

    • Does the operating model contain all the necessary capabilities your IT organization requires to be successful?
    • What capabilities should be duplicated?
    • Are there individuals with the skill set to support those roles? If not, is there a plan to acquire or develop those skills?
    • A dedicated project team strictly focused on M&A is great. However, is it feasible for your organization? If not, what blockers exist?
    A diagram with 'Initiatives' and 'Solutions' on the left and right of an area chart, 'Customer' at the top, the area between them labelled 'Functional Area n', and six horizontal bars labelled 'IT Capability' stacked on top of each other. The 'IT Capability' bars are slightly skewed to the 'Solutions' side of the chart.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Investing time up-front getting the operating model right is critical. This will give you a framework to rationalize future organizational changes, allowing you to be more iterative and allowing your model to change as the business changes.

    2.1.3 Create the future-state operating model

    4 hours

    Input: Current operating model, IT strategy, IT capabilities, M&A-specific IT capabilities, Business objectives, Rationale for the transaction, Mission and vision statements

    Output: Future-state operating model

    Materials: Operating model, Capability overlay, Flip charts/whiteboard, Markers, M&A Buy Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Company M&A team

    The purpose of this activity is to establish what the future-state operating model will be if your organization needs to adjust to support a growth transaction.

    1. Ensuring that all the IT capabilities are identified by the business and IT strategy, document your organization’s current operating model.
    2. Identify what core capabilities would be critical to the buying transaction process and integration. Highlight and make copies of those capabilities in the M&A Buy Playbook.
    3. Arrange the capabilities to clearly show the flow of inputs and outputs. Identify critical stakeholders of the process (such as customers or end users) if that will help the flow.
    4. Ensure the capabilities that will be decentralized are clearly identified. Decentralized capabilities do not exist within the central IT organization but rather in specific lines of businesses or products to better understand needs and deliver on the capability.

    An example operating model is included in the M&A Buy Playbook. This process benefits from strong reference architecture and capability mapping ahead of time.

    Record the results in the M&A Buy Playbook.

    2.1.4 Determine the transition team

    3 hours

    Input: IT capabilities, Future-state operating model, M&A-specific IT capabilities, Business objectives, Rationale for the transaction, Mission and vision statements

    Output: Transition team

    Materials: Reference architecture, Organizational structure, Flip charts/whiteboard, Markers

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Company M&A team

    The purpose of this activity is to create a team that will support your IT organization throughout the transaction. Determining which capabilities and therefore which roles will be required ensures that the business will continue to get the operational support it needs.

    1. Based on the outcome of activity 2.1.3, review the capabilities that your organization will require on the transition team. Group capabilities into functional groups containing capabilities that are aligned well with one another because they have similar responsibilities and functionalities.
    2. Replace the capabilities with roles. For example, stakeholder management, requirements gathering, and project management might be one functional group. Project management and stakeholder management might combine to create a project manager role.
    3. Review the examples in the M&A Buy Playbook and identify which roles will be a part of the transition team.

    For more information, see Redesign Your Organizational Structure

    What is governance?

    And why does it matter so much to IT and the M&A process?

    • Governance is the method in which decisions get made, specifically as they impact various resources (time, money, and people).
    • Because M&A is such a highly governed transaction, it is important to document the governance bodies that exist in your organization.
    • This will give insight into what types of governing bodies there are, what decisions they make, and how that will impact IT.
    • For example, funds to support integration need to be discussed, approved, and supplied to IT from a governing body overseeing the acquisition.
    • A highly mature IT organization will have automated governance, while a seemingly non-existent governance process will be considered ad hoc.
    A pyramid with four levels representing the types of governing bodies that are available with differing levels of IT maturity. An arrow beside the pyramid points upward. The bottom of the arrow is labelled 'Traditional (People and document centric)' and the top is labelled 'Adaptive (Data centric)'. Starting at the bottom of the pyramid is level 1 'Ad Hoc Governance', 'Governance that is not well defined or understood within the organization. It occurs out of necessity but often not by the right people'. Level 2 is 'Controlled Governance', 'Governance focused on compliance and decisions driven by hierarchical authority. Levels of authority are defined and often driven by regulatory'. Level 3 is 'Agile Governance', 'Governance that is flexible to support different needs and quick response in the organization. Driven by principles and delegated throughout the company'. At the top of the pyramid is level 4 'Automated Governance', 'Governance that is entrenched and automated into organizational processes and product/service design. Empowered and fully delegated governance to maintain fit and drive organizational success and survival'.

    2.1.5 Document M&A governance

    1-2 hours

    Input: List of governing bodies, Governing body committee profiles, Governance structure

    Output: Documented method on how decisions are made as it relates to the M&A transaction

    Materials: Flip charts/whiteboard, Markers, M&A Buy Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Company M&A team

    The purpose of this activity is to determine the method in which decisions are made throughout the M&A transaction as it relates to IT. This will require understanding both governing bodies internal to IT and those external to IT.

    1. First, determine the other governance structures within the organization that will impact the decisions made about M&A. List out these bodies or committees.
    2. Create a profile for each committee that looks at the membership, purpose of the committee, decision areas (authority), and the process of inputs and outputs. Ensure IT committees that will have a role in this process are also documented. Consider the benefits realized, risks, and resources required for each.
    3. Organize the committees into a structure, identifying the committees that have a role in defining the strategy, designing and building, and running.

    Record the results in the M&A Buy Playbook.

    Current-state structure map – definitions of tiers

    Strategy: These groups will focus on decisions that directly connect to the strategic direction of the organization.

    Design & Build: The second tier of groups will oversee prioritization of a certain area of governance as well as design and build decisions that feed into strategic decisions.

    Run: The lowest level of governance will be oversight of more-specific initiatives and capabilities within IT.

    Expect tier overlap. Some committees will operate in areas that cover two or three of these governance tiers.

    Measure the IT program’s success in terms of its ability to support the business’ M&A goals

    Upper management will measure IT’s success based on your ability to support the underlying reasons for the M&A. Using business metrics will help assure business stakeholders that IT understands their needs and is working with the business to achieve them.

    Business-Specific Metrics

    • Revenue Growth: Increase in the top line as seen by market expansion, product expansion, etc. by percentage/time.
    • Synergy Extraction: Reduction in costs as determined by the ability to identify and eliminate redundancies over time.
    • Profit Margin Growth: Increase in the bottom line as a result of increased revenue growth and/or decreased costs over time.

    IT-Specific Metrics

    • IT operational savings and cost reductions due to synergies: Operating expenses, capital expenditures, licenses, contracts, applications, infrastructure over time.
    • Reduction in IT staff expense and headcount: Decreased budget allocated to IT staff, and ability to identify and remove redundancies in staff.
    • Meeting or improving on IT budget estimates: Delivering successful IT integration on a budget that is the same or lower than the budget estimated during due diligence.
    • Meeting or improving on IT time-to-integration estimates: Delivering successful IT integration on a timeline that is the same or shorter than the timeline estimated during due diligence.
    • Business capability support: Delivering the end state of IT that supports the expected business capabilities and growth.

    Establish your own metrics to gauge the success of IT

    Establish SMART M&A Success Metrics

    S pecific Make sure the objective is clear and detailed.
    M easurable Objectives are measurable if there are specific metrics assigned to measure success. Metrics should be objective.
    A ctionable Objectives become actionable when specific initiatives designed to achieve the objective are identified.
    R ealistic Objectives must be achievable given your current resources or known available resources.
    T ime-Bound An objective without a timeline can be put off indefinitely. Furthermore, measuring success is challenging without a timeline.
    • What should IT consider when looking to identify potential additions, deletions, or modifications that will either add value to the organization or reduce costs/risks?
    • Provide a definition of synergies.
    • IT operational savings and cost reductions due to synergies: Operating expenses, capital expenditures, licenses, contracts, applications, infrastructure.
    • Reduction in IT staff expense and headcount: Decreased budget allocated to IT staff, and ability to identify and remove redundancies in staff.
    • Meeting or improving on IT budget estimates: Delivering successful IT integration on a budget that is the same or lower than the budget estimated during due diligence.
    • Meeting or improving on IT time-to-integration estimates: Delivering successful IT integration on a timeline that is the same or shorter than the timeline estimated during due diligence.
    • Revenue growth: Increase in the top line as a result, as seen by market expansion, product expansion, etc.
    • Synergy extraction: Reduction in costs, as determined by the ability to identify and eliminate redundancies.
    • Profit margin growth: Increase in the bottom line as a result of increased revenue growth and/or decreased costs.

    Metrics for each phase

    1. Proactive

    2. Discovery & Strategy

    3. Valuation & Due Diligence

    4. Execution & Value Realization

    • % Share of business innovation spend from overall IT budget
    • % Critical processes with approved performance goals and metrics
    • % IT initiatives that meet or exceed value expectation defined in business case
    • % IT initiatives aligned with organizational strategic direction
    • % Satisfaction with IT's strategic decision-making abilities
    • $ Estimated business value added through IT-enabled innovation
    • % Overall stakeholder satisfaction with IT
    • % Percent of business leaders that view IT as an Innovator
    • % IT budget as a percent of revenue
    • % Assets that are not allocated
    • % Unallocated software licenses
    • # Obsolete assets
    • % IT spend that can be attributed to the business (chargeback or showback)
    • % Share of CapEx of overall IT budget
    • % Prospective organizations that meet the search criteria
    • $ Total IT cost of ownership (before and after M&A, before and after rationalization)
    • % Business leaders that view IT as a Business Partner
    • % Defects discovered in production
    • $ Cost per user for enterprise applications
    • % In-house-built applications vs. enterprise applications
    • % Owners identified for all data domains
    • # IT staff asked to participate in due diligence
    • Change to due diligence
    • IT budget variance
    • Synergy target
    • % Satisfaction with the effectiveness of IT capabilities
    • % Overall end-customer satisfaction
    • $ Impact of vendor SLA breaches
    • $ Savings through cost-optimization efforts
    • $ Savings through application rationalization and technology standardization
    • # Key positions empty
    • % Frequency of staff turnover
    • % Emergency changes
    • # Hours of unplanned downtime
    • % Releases that cause downtime
    • % Incidents with identified problem record
    • % Problems with identified root cause
    • # Days from problem identification to root cause fix
    • % Projects that consider IT risk
    • % Incidents due to issues not addressed in the security plan
    • # Average vulnerability remediation time
    • % Application budget spent on new build/buy vs. maintenance (deferred feature implementation, enhancements, bug fixes)
    • # Time (days) to value realization
    • % Projects that realized planned benefits
    • $ IT operational savings and cost reductions that are related to synergies/divestitures
    • % IT staff–related expenses/redundancies
    • # Days spent on IT integration
    • $ Accurate IT budget estimates
    • % Revenue growth directly tied to IT delivery
    • % Profit margin growth

    2.1.6 Create program metrics

    1-2 hours

    Input: IT capabilities, Mission, vision, and guiding principles, Rationale for the acquisition

    Output: Program metrics to support IT throughout the M&A process

    Materials: Flip charts/whiteboard, Markers, M&A Buy Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Company M&A team

    The purpose of this activity is to determine how IT’s success throughout a growth transaction will be measured and determined.

    1. Document a list of appropriate metrics on the whiteboard. Remember to include metrics that demonstrate the business impact. You can use the sample metrics listed on the previous slide as a starting point.
    2. Set a target and deadline for each metric. This will help the group determine when it is time to evaluate progression.
    3. Establish a baseline for each metric based on information collected within your organization.
    4. Assign an owner for tracking each metric as well as someone to be accountable for performance.

    Record the results in the M&A Buy Playbook.

    Discovery & Strategy

    Step 2.2

    Prepare IT to Engage in the Acquisition

    Activities

    • 2.2.1 Establish the integration strategy
    • 2.2.2 Conduct a RACI
    • 2.2.3 Create the communication plan
    • 2.2.4 Assess the potential organization(s)

    This step involves the following participants:

    • IT executive/CIO
    • IT senior leadership
    • Company M&A team

    Outcomes of Step

    Identify IT’s plan of action when it comes to the acquisition and align IT’s integration strategy with the business’ M&A strategy.

    Integration strategies

    There are several IT integration strategies that will help you achieve your target technology environment.

    IT Integration Strategies
    • Absorption. Convert the target organization’s strategy, structure, processes, and/or systems to that of the acquiring organization.
    • Best-of-Breed. Pick and choose the most effective people, processes, and technologies to form an efficient operating model.
    • Transformation Retire systems from both organizations and use collective capabilities, data, and processes to create something entirely new.
    • Preservation Retain individual business units that will operate within their own capability. People, processes, and technologies are unchanged.

    The approach IT takes will depend on the business objectives for the M&A.

    • Generally speaking, the integration strategy is well understood and influenced by the frequency of and rationale for acquiring.
    • Based on the initiatives generated by each business process owner, you need to determine the IT integration strategy that will best support the desired target technology environment.

    Key considerations when choosing an IT integration strategy include:

    • What are the main business objectives of the M&A?
    • What are the key synergies expected from the transaction?
    • What IT integration best helps obtain these benefits?
    • What opportunities exist to position the business for sustainable growth?

    Absorption and best-of-breed

    Review highlights and drawbacks of absorption and best-of-breed integration strategies

    Absorption
      Highlights
    • Recommended for businesses striving to reduce costs and drive efficiency gains.
    • Economies of scale realized through consolidation and elimination of redundant applications.
    • Quickest path to a single company operation and systems as well as lower overall IT cost.
      Drawbacks
    • Potential for disruption of the target company’s business operations.
    • Requires significant business process changes.
    • Disregarding the target offerings altogether may lead to inferior system decisions that do not yield sustainable results.
    Best-of-Breed
      Highlights
    • Recommended for businesses looking to expand their market presence or acquire new products. Essentially aligning the two organizations in the same market.
    • Each side has a unique offering but complementing capabilities.
    • Potential for better buy-in from the target because some of their systems are kept, resulting in willingness to
      Drawbacks
    • May take longer to integrate because it tends to present increased complexity that results in higher costs and risks.
    • Requires major integration efforts from both sides of the company. If the target organization is uncooperative, creating the desired technology environment will be difficult.

    Transformation and preservation

    Review highlights and drawbacks of transformation and preservation integration strategies

    Transformation
      Highlights
    • This is the most customized approach, although it is rarely used.
    • It is essential to have an established long-term vision of business capabilities when choosing this path.
    • When executed correctly, this approach presents potential for significant upside and creation of sustainable competitive advantages.
      Drawbacks
    • This approach requires extensive time to implement, and the cost of integration work may be significant.
    • If a new system is created without strategic capabilities, the organizations will not realize long-term benefits.
    • The cost of correcting complexities at later stages in the integration effort may be drastic.
    Preservation
      Highlights
    • This approach is appropriate if the merging organizations will remain fairly independent, if there will be limited or no communication between companies, and if the companies’ market strategies, products, and channels are entirely distinct.
    • Environment can be accomplished quickly and at a low cost.
      Drawbacks
    • Impact to each business is minimal, but there is potential for lost synergies and higher operational costs. This may be uncontrollable if the natures of the two businesses are too different to integrate.
    • Reduced benefits and limited opportunities for IT integration.

    2.2.1 Establish the integration strategy

    1-2 hours

    Input: Business integration strategy, Guiding principles, M&A governance

    Output: IT’s integration strategy

    Materials: Flip charts/whiteboard, Markers, M&A Buy Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Company M&A team

    The purpose of this activity is to determine IT’s approach to integration. The approach might differ slightly from transaction to transaction. However, the business’ approach to transactions should give insight into the general integration strategy IT should adopt.

    1. Make sure you have clearly articulated the business objectives for the M&A, the technology end state for IT, and the magnitude of the overall integration.
    2. Review and discuss the highlights and drawbacks of each type of integration.
    3. Use Info-Tech’s Integration Posture Selection Framework on the next slide to select the integration posture that will appropriately enable the business. Consider these questions during your discussion:
      1. What are the main business objectives of the M&A? What key IT capabilities will need to support business objectives?
      2. What key synergies are expected from the transaction? What opportunities exist to position the business for sustainable growth?
      3. What IT integration best helps obtain these benefits?

    Record the results in the M&A Buy Playbook.

    Integration Posture Selection Framework

    Business M&A Strategy

    Resultant Technology Strategy

    M&A Magnitude (% of Acquirer Assets, Income, or Market Value)

    IT Integration Posture

    A. Horizontal Adopt One Model ‹10% Absorption
    10 to 75% Absorption or Best-of-Breed
    ›75% Best-of-Breed
    B. Vertical Create Links Between Critical Systems Any
    • Preservation (Differentiated Functions)
    • Absorption or Best-of-Breed (Non-Differentiated Functions)
    C. Conglomerate Independent Model Any Preservation
    D. Hybrid: Horizontal & Conglomerate Independent Model Any Preservation

    2.2.2 Conduct a RACI

    1-2 hours

    Input: IT capabilities, Transition team, Integration strategy

    Output: Completed RACI for transition team

    Materials: Reference architecture, Organizational structure, Flip charts/whiteboard, Markers, M&A Buy Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Company M&A team

    The purpose of this activity is to identify the core accountabilities and responsibilities for the roles identified as critical to your transition team. While there might be slight variation from transaction to transaction, ideally each role should be performing certain tasks.

    1. First, identify a list of critical tasks that need to be completed to support the purchase or acquisition. For example:
      • Communicate with the company M&A team.
      • Identify critical IT risks that could impact the organization after the transaction.
      • Identify key artifacts to collect and review during due diligence.
    2. Next, identify at the activity level which role is accountable or responsible for each activity. Enter an A for accountable, R for responsible, or A/R for both.

    Record the results in the M&A Buy Playbook.

    Communication and change

    Prepare key stakeholders for the potential changes

    • Anytime you are starting a project or program that will depend on users and stakeholders to give up their old way of doing things, change will force people to become novices again, leading to lost productivity and added stress.
    • Change management can improve outcomes for any project where you need people to adopt new tools and procedures, comply with new policies, learn new skills and behaviors, or understand and support new processes.
    • M&As move very quickly, and it can be very difficult to keep track of which stakeholders you need to be communicating with and what you should be communicating.
    • Not all organizations embrace or resist change in the same ways. Base your change communications on your organization’s cultural appetite for change in general.
      • Organizations with a low appetite for change will require more direct, assertive communications.
      • Organizations with a high appetite for change are more suited to more open, participatory approaches.

    Three key dimensions determine the appetite for cultural change:

    • Power Distance. Refers to the acceptance that power is distributed unequally throughout the organization.
      In organizations with a high power distance, the unequal power distribution is accepted by the less powerful employees.
    • Individualism. Organizations that score high in individualism have employees who are more independent. Those who score low in individualism fall into the collectivism side, where employees are strongly tied to one another or their groups.
    • Uncertainty Avoidance. Describes the level of acceptance that an organization has toward uncertainty. Those who score high in this area find that their employees do not favor uncertain situations, while those that score low in this area find that their employees are comfortable with change and uncertainty.

    2.2.3 Create the communication plan

    1-2 hours

    Input: IT’s M&A mission, vision, and guiding principles, M&A transition team, IT integration strategy, RACI

    Output: IT’s M&A communication plan

    Materials: Flip charts/whiteboard, Markers, RACI, M&A Buy Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Company M&A team

    The purpose of this activity is to create a communication plan that IT can leverage throughout the initiative.

    1. Create a structured communication plan that allows for continuous communication with the integration management office, senior management, and the business functional heads.
    2. Outline key topics of communication, with stakeholders, inputs, and outputs for each topic.
    3. Review Info-Tech’s example communication plan in the M&A Buy Playbook and update it with relevant information.
    4. Does this communication plan make sense for your organization? What doesn’t make sense? Adjust the communication guide to suit your organization.

    Record the results in the M&A Buy Playbook.

    Assessing potential organizations

    As soon as you have identified organizations to consider, it’s imperative to assess critical risks. Most IT leaders can attest that they will receive little to no notice when they have to assess the IT organization of a potential purchase. As a result, having a standardized template to quickly gauge the value of the business can be critical.

    Ways to Assess

    1. News: Assess what sort of news has been announced in relation to the organization. Have they had any risk incidents? Has a critical vendor announced working with them?
    2. LinkedIn: Scan through the LinkedIn profiles of employees. This will give you a sense of what platforms they have based on their employees.
    3. Trends: Some industries will have specific solutions that are relevant and popular. Assess what the key players are (if you don’t already know) to determine the solution.
    4. Business Architecture: While this assessment won’t perfect, try to understand the business’ value streams and the critical business and IT capabilities that would be needed to support them.

    2.2.4 Assess the potential organization(s)

    1-2 hours

    Input: Publicized historical risk events, Solutions and vendor contracts likely in the works, Trends

    Output: IT’s valuation of the potential organization(s) for acquisition

    Materials: M&A Buy Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO

    The purpose of this activity is to assess the organization(s) that your organization is considering purchasing.

    1. Complete the Historical Valuation Worksheet in the M&A Buy Playbook to understand the type of IT organization that your company may inherit and need to integrate with.
      • The business likely isn’t looking for in-depth details at this time. However, as the IT leader, it is your responsibility to ensure critical risks are identified and communicated to the business.
    2. Use the information identified to help the business narrow down which organizations should be targeted for the acquisition.

    Record the results in the M&A Buy Playbook.

    By the end of this pre-transaction phase you should:

    Have a program plan for M&As and a repeatable M&A strategy for IT when engaging in growth transactions

    Key outcomes from the Discovery & Strategy phase
    • Be prepared to analyze and recommend potential organizations that the business can acquire or merge with, using a strong program plan that can be repeated across transactions.
    • Create a M&A strategy that accounts for all the necessary elements of a transaction and ensures sufficient governance, capabilities, and metrics exist.
    Key deliverables from the Discovery & Strategy phase
    • Create vision and mission statements
    • Establish guiding principles
    • Create a future-state operating model
    • Identify the key roles for the transaction team
    • Identify and communicate the M&A governance
    • Determine target metrics
    • Identify the M&A operating model
    • Select the integration strategy framework
    • Conduct a RACI for key transaction tasks for the transaction team
    • Document the communication plan

    M&A Buy Blueprint

    Phase 3

    Due Diligence & Preparation

    Phase 1Phase 2

    Phase 3

    Phase 4
    • 1.1 Identify Stakeholders and Their Perspective of IT
    • 1.2 Assess IT’s Current Value and Future State
    • 1.3 Drive Innovation and Suggest Growth Opportunities
    • 2.1 Establish the M&A Program Plan
    • 2.2 Prepare IT to Engage in the Acquisition
    • 3.1 Assess the Target Organization
    • 3.2 Prepare to Integrate
    • 4.1 Execute the Transaction
    • 4.2 Reflection and Value Realization

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Drive value with a due diligence charter
    • Identify data room artifacts
    • Assess technical debt
    • Valuate the target IT organization
    • Assess culture
    • Prioritize integration tasks
    • Establish the integration roadmap
    • Identify the needed workforce supply
    • Estimate integration costs
    • Create an employee transition plan
    • Create functional workplans for employees
    • Align project metrics with identified tasks

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • IT executive/CIO
    • IT senior leadership
    • Company M&A team
    • Business leaders
    • Prospective IT organization
    • Transition team

    Workshop Overview

    Contact your account representative for more information.
    workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8889

    Pre-Work

    Day 1

    Day 2

    Day 3

    Day 4

    Day 5

    Establish the Transaction FoundationDiscover the Motivation for IntegrationAssess the Target Organization(s)Create the Valuation FrameworkPlan the Integration RoadmapNext Steps and Wrap-Up (offsite)

    Activities

    • 0.1 Identify the rationale for the company's decisions to pursue an acquisition.
    • 0.2 Identify key stakeholders and determine the IT transaction team.
    • 0.3 Gather and evaluate the M&A strategy, future-state operating model, and governance.
    • 1.1 Review the business rationale for the acquisition.
    • 1.2 Identify pain points and opportunities tied to the acquisition.
    • 1.3 Establish the integration strategy.
    • 1.4 Create the due diligence charter.
    • 2.1 Create a list of IT artifacts to be reviewed in the data room.
    • 2.2 Conduct a technical debt assessment.
    • 2.3 Assess the current culture and identify the goal culture.
    • 2.4 Identify the needed workforce supply.
    • 3.1 Valuate the target organization’s data.
    • 3.2 Valuate the target organization’s applications.
    • 3.3 Valuate the target organization’s infrastructure.
    • 3.4 Valuate the target organization’s risk and security.
    • 3.5 Combine individual valuations to make a single framework.
    • 4.1 Prioritize integration tasks.
    • 4.2 Establish the integration roadmap.
    • 4.3 Establish and align project metrics with identified tasks.
    • 4.4 Estimate integration costs.
    • 5.1 Complete in-progress deliverables from previous four days.
    • 5.2 Set up review time for workshop deliverables and to discuss next steps.

    Deliverables

    1. IT strategy
    2. IT operating model
    3. IT governance structure
    4. M&A transaction team
    1. Business context implications for IT
    2. Integration strategy
    3. Due diligence charter
    1. Data room artifacts
    2. Technical debt assessment
    3. Culture assessment
    4. Workforce supply identified
    1. IT valuation framework to assess target organization(s)
    1. Integration roadmap and associated resourcing
    1. Acquisition integration strategy for IT

    What is the Due Diligence & Preparation phase?

    Mid-transaction state

    The Due Diligence & Preparation phase during an acquisition is a critical time for IT. If IT fails to proactively participate in this phase, IT will have to merely react to integration expectations set by the business.

    While not all IT organizations are able to participate in this phase, the evolving nature of M&As to be driven by digital and technological capabilities increases the rationale for IT being at the table. Identifying critical IT risks, which will inevitably be business risks, begins during the due diligence phase.

    This is also the opportunity for IT to plan how it will execute the planned integration strategy. Having access to critical information only available in data rooms will further enable IT to successfully plan and execute the acquisition to deliver the value the business is seeking through a growth transaction.

    Goal: To thoroughly evaluate all potential risks associated with the organization(s) being pursued and create a detailed plan for integrating the IT environments

    Due Diligence Prerequisite Checklist

    Before coming into the Due Diligence & Preparation phase, you must have addressed the following:

    • Understand the rationale for the company's decisions to pursue an acquisition and what opportunities or pain points the acquisition should alleviate.
    • Identify the key roles for the transaction team.
    • Identify the M&A governance.
    • Determine target metrics.
    • Select an integration strategy framework.
    • Conduct a RACI for key transaction tasks for the transaction team.

    Before coming into the Due Diligence & Preparation phase, we recommend addressing the following:

    • Create vision and mission statements.
    • Establish guiding principles.
    • Create a future-state operating model.
    • Identify the M&A operating model.
    • Document the communication plan.
    • Examine the business perspective of IT.
    • Identify key stakeholders and outline their relationship to the M&A process.
    • Be able to valuate the IT environment and communicate IT’s value to the business.

    The Technology Value Trinity

    Delivery of Business Value & Strategic Needs

    • Digital & Technology Strategy
      The identification of objectives and initiatives necessary to achieve business goals.
    • IT Operating Model
      The model for how IT is organized to deliver on business needs and strategies.
    • Information & Technology Governance
      The governance to ensure the organization and its customers get maximum value from the use of information and technology.

    All three elements of the Technology Value Trinity work in harmony to deliver business value and achieve strategic needs. As one changes, the others need to change as well.

    • Digital and IT Strategy tells you what you need to achieve to be successful.
    • IT Operating Model and Organizational Design is the alignment of resources to deliver on your strategy and priorities.
    • Information & Technology Governance is the confirmation of IT’s goals and strategy, which ensures the alignment of IT and business strategy. It’s the mechanism by which you continuously prioritize work to ensure that what is delivered is in line with the strategy. This oversight evaluates, directs, and monitors the delivery of outcomes to ensure that the use of resources results in the achieving the organization’s goals.

    Too often strategy, operating model and organizational design, and governance are considered separate practices. As a result, “strategic documents” end up being wish lists, and projects continue to be prioritized based on who shouts the loudest – not based on what is in the best interest of the organization.

    Due Diligence & Preparation

    Step 3.1

    Assess the Target Organization

    Activities

    • 3.1.1 Drive value with a due diligence charter
    • 3.1.2 Identify data room artifacts
    • 3.1.3 Assess technical debt
    • 3.1.4 Valuate the target IT organization
    • 3.1.5 Assess culture

    This step involves the following participants:

    • IT executive/CIO
    • IT senior leadership
    • Company M&A team
    • Business leaders
    • Prospective IT organization
    • Transition team

    Outcomes of Step

    This step of the process is when IT should actively evaluate the target organization being pursued for acquisition.

    3.1.1 Drive value with a due diligence charter

    1-2 hours

    Input: Key roles for the transaction team, M&A governance, Target metrics, Selected integration strategy framework, RACI of key transaction tasks for the transaction team

    Output: IT Due Diligence Charter

    Materials: M&A Buy Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Company M&A team

    The purpose of this activity is to create a charter leveraging the items completed in the previous phase, as listed on the Due Diligence Prerequisite Checklist slide, to gain executive sign-off.

    1. In the IT Due Diligence Charter in the M&A Buy Playbook, complete the aspects of the charter that are relevant for you and your organization.
    2. We recommend including these items in the charter:
      • Communication plan
      • Transition team roles
      • Goals and metrics for the transaction
      • Integration strategy
      • Acquisition RACI
    3. Once the charter has been completed, ensure that business executives agree to the charter and sign off on the plan of action.

    Record the results in the M&A Buy Playbook.

    3.1.2 Identify data room artifacts

    4 hours

    Input: Future-state operating model, M&A governance, Target metrics, Selected integration strategy framework, RACI of key transaction tasks for the transaction team

    Output: List of items to acquire and review in the data room

    Materials: Critical domain lists on following slides, M&A Buy Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Company M&A team, Transition team

    The purpose of this activity is to create a list of the key artifacts that should be asked for and reviewed during the due diligence process.

    1. Review the lists on the following pages as a starting point. Identify which domains, stakeholders, artifacts, and information should be requested for the data room. This information should be directed to the target organization.
    2. IT leadership may or may not be asked to enter the data room directly. Therefore, it’s important that you clearly identify these artifacts.
    3. List each question or concern, select the associated workstream in the M&A Buy Playbook, and update the status of the information retrieval.
    4. Use the comments section to document your discoveries or concerns.

    Record the results in the M&A Buy Playbook.

    Critical domains

    Understand the key stakeholders and outputs for each domain

    Each critical domain will likely have different stakeholders who know that domain best. Communicate with these stakeholders throughout the M&A process to make sure you are getting accurate information and interpreting it correctly.

    Domain

    Stakeholders

    Key Artifacts

    Key Information to request

    Business
    • Enterprise Architecture
    • Business Relationship Manager
    • Business Process Owners
    • Business capability map
    • Capability map (the M&A team should be taking care of this, but make sure it exists)
    • Business satisfaction with various IT systems and services
    Leadership/IT Executive
    • CIO
    • CTO
    • CISO
    • IT budgets
    • IT capital and operating budgets (from current year and previous year)
    Data & Analytics
    • Chief Data Officer
    • Data Architect
    • Enterprise Architect
    • Master data domains, system of record for each
    • Unstructured data retention requirements
    • Data architecture
    • Master data domains, sources, and storage
    • Data retention requirements
    Applications
    • Applications Manager
    • Application Portfolio Manager
    • Application Architect
    • Applications map
    • Applications inventory
    • Applications architecture
    • Copy of all software license agreements
    • Copy of all software maintenance agreements
    Infrastructure
    • Head of Infrastructure
    • Enterprise Architect
    • Infrastructure Architect
    • Infrastructure Manager
    • Infrastructure map
    • Infrastructure inventory
    • Network architecture (including which data centers host which infrastructure and applications)
    • Inventory (including integration capabilities of vendors, versions, switches, and routers)
    • Copy of all hardware lease or purchase agreements
    • Copy of all hardware maintenance agreements
    • Copy of all outsourcing/external service provider agreements
    • Copy of all service-level agreements for centrally provided, shared services and systems
    Products and Services
    • Product Manager
    • Head of Customer Interactions
    • Product lifecycle
    • Product inventory
    • Customer market strategy

    Critical domains (continued)

    Understand the key stakeholders and outputs for each domain

    Domain

    Stakeholders

    Key Artifacts

    Key Information to request

    Operations
    • Head of Operations
    • Service catalog
    • Service overview
    • Service owners
    • Access policies and procedures
    • Availability and service levels
    • Support policies and procedures
    • Costs and approvals (internal and customer costs)
    IT Processes
    • CIO
    • IT Management
    • VP of IT Governance
    • VP of IT Strategy
    • IT process flow diagram
    • Processes in place and productivity levels (capacity)
    • Critical processes/processes the organization feels they do particularly well
    IT People
    • CIO
    • VP of Human Resources
    • IT organizational chart
    • Competency & capacity assessment
    • IT organizational structure (including resources from external service providers such as contractors) with appropriate job descriptions or roles and responsibilities
    • IT headcount and location
    Security
    • CISO
    • Security Architect
    • Security posture
    • Information security staff
    • Information security service providers
    • Information security tools
    • In-flight information security projects
    Projects
    • Head of Projects
    • Project portfolio
    • List of all future, ongoing, and recently completed projects
    Vendors
    • Head of Vendor Management
    • License inventory
    • Inventory (including what will and will not be transitioning, vendors, versions, number of licenses)

    Assess the target organization’s technical debt

    The other organization could be costly to purchase if not yet modernizing.

    • Consider the potential costs that your business will have to spend to get the other IT organization modernized or even digital.
    • This will be highly affected by your planned integration strategy.
    • A best-of-breed strategy might simply mean there's little to bring over from the other organization’s environment.
    • It’s often challenging to identify a direct financial cost for technical debt. Consider direct costs but also assess categories of impact that can have a long-term effect on your business: lost customer, staff, or business partner goodwill; limited flexibility and resilience; and health, safety, and compliance impacts.
    • Use more objective measures to track subjective impact. For example, consider the number of customers who could be significantly affected by each tech debt in the next quarter.

    Focus on solving the problems you need to address.

    Analyzing technical debt has value in that the analysis can help your organization make better risk management and resource allocation decisions.

    Review these examples of technical debt

    Do you have any of these challenges?

    Applications
    • Inefficient or incomplete code
    • Fragile or obsolete systems of record that limit the implementation of new functionality
    • Out-of-date IDEs or compilers
    • Unsupported applications
    Data & Analytics
    • Data presented via API that does not conform to chosen standards (EDI, NRF-ARTS, etc.)
    • Poor data governance
    • No transformation between OLTP and the data warehouse
    • Heavy use of OLTP for reporting
    • Lack of AI model and decision governance, maintenance
    End-User Computing
    • Aging and slow equipment
    • No configuration management
    • No MDM/UEM
    Security
    • Unpatched/unpatchable systems
    • Legacy firewalls
    • No data classification system
    • “Perimeter” security architecture
    • No documented security incident response
    • No policies, or unenforced policies
    Operations
    • Incomplete, ineffective, or undocumented business continuity and disaster recovery plans
    • Insufficient backups or archiving
    • Inefficient MACD processes
    • Application sprawl with no record of installed applications or licenses
    • No ticketing or ITSM system
    • No change management process
    • No problem management process
    • No event/alert management
    Infrastructure
    • End-of-life/unsupported equipment
    • Aging power or cooling systems
    • Water- or halon-based data center fire suppression systems
    • Out-of-date firmware
    • No DR site
    • Damaged or messy cabling
    • Lack of system redundancy
    • Integrated computers on business equipment (e.g. shop floor equipment, medical equipment) running out-of-date OS/software
    Project & Portfolio Management
    • No project closure process
    • Ineffective project intake process
    • No resource management practices

    “This isn’t a philosophical exercise. Knowing what you want to get out of this analysis informs the type of technical debt you will calculate and the approach you will take.” (Scott Buchholz, CTO, Deloitte Government & Public Services Practice, The Wall Street Journal, 2015)

    3.1.3 Assess technical debt

    1-2 hours

    Input: Participant views on organizational tech debt, Five to ten key technical debts, Business impact scoring scales, Reasonable next-quarter scenarios for each technical debt, Technical debt business impact analysis

    Output: Initial list of tech debt for the target organization

    Materials: Whiteboard, Sticky notes, Technical Debt Business Impact Analysis Tool, M&A Buy Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Business leaders, Transition team

    The purpose of this activity is to assess the technical debt of the other IT organization. Taking on unnecessary technical debt is one of the biggest risks to the IT environment

    1. This activity can be completed by leveraging the blueprint Manage Your Technical Debt, specifically the Technical Debt Business Impact Analysis Tool. Complete the following activities in the blueprint:
      • 1.2.1 Identify your technical debt
      • 1.2.2 Select tech debt for your impact analysis
      • 2.2.2 Estimate tech debt impact
      • 2.2.3 Identify the most-critical technical debts
    2. Review examples of technical debt in the previous slide to assist you with this activity.
    3. Document the results from tab 3, Impact Analysis, in the M&A Buy Playbook if you are trying to record all artifacts related to the transaction in one place.

    Record the results in the M&A Buy Playbook.

    How to valuate an IT environment

    And why it matters so much

    • Valuating the target organization’s IT environment is a critical step to fully understand what it might be worth. Business partners are often not in the position to valuate the IT aspects to the degree that you would be.
    • The business investments in IT can be directly translated to a value amount. Meaning for every $1 invested in IT, the business might be gaining $100 in value back or possibly even loosing $100.
    • Determining, documenting, and communicating this information ensures that the business takes IT’s suggestions seriously and recognizes why investing in IT can be so critical.
    • There are three ways a business or asset can be valuated:
      • Cost Approach: Look at the costs associated with building, purchasing, replacing, and maintaining a given aspect of the business.
      • Market Approach: Look at the relative value of a particular aspect of the business. Relative value can fluctuate and depends on what the markets and consequently society believe that particular element is worth.
      • Discounted Cash Flow Approach: Focus on what the potential value of the business could be or the intrinsic value anticipated due to future profitability.

    The IT valuation conducted during due diligence can have a significant impact on the final financials of the transaction for the business.

    3.1.4 Valuate the target IT organization

    1 day

    Input: Valuation of data, Valuation of applications, Valuation of infrastructure and operations, Valuation of security and risk

    Output: Valuation of target organization’s IT

    Materials: Relevant templates/tools, Capital budget, Operating budget, M&A Buy Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Prospective IT organization

    The purpose of this activity is to valuate the other IT organization.

    1. Review each of slides 42 to 45 to generate a valuation of IT’s data, applications, infrastructure, and security and risk. These valuations consider several tangible and intangible factors and result in a final dollar amount. For more information on this activity, review Activity 1.2.1 from the Proactive phase.
    2. Identify financial amounts for each critical area and add the financial output to the summary slide in the M&A Buy Playbook.
    3. Compare this information against your own IT organization’s valuation.
      1. Does it add value to your IT organization?
      2. Is there too much risk to accept if this transaction goes through?

    Info-Tech Insight

    Consistency is key when valuating your IT organization as well as other IT organizations throughout the transaction process.

    Record the results in the M&A Buy Playbook.

    Culture should not be overlooked, especially as it relates to the integration of IT environments

    • There are three types of culture that need to be considered.
    • Most importantly, this transition is an opportunity to change the culture that might exist in your organization’s IT environment.
    • Make a decision on which type of culture you’d like IT to have post-transition.

    Target Organization’s Culture

    The culture that the target organization is currently embracing. Their established and undefined governance practices will lend insight into this.

    Your Organization’s Culture

    The culture that your organization is currently embracing. Examine people’s attitudes and behaviors within IT toward their jobs and the organization.

    Ideal Culture

    What will the future culture of the IT organization be once integration is complete? Are there aspects that your current organization and the target organization embrace that are worth considering?

    Culture categories

    Map the results of the IT Culture Diagnostic to an existing framework

    Competitive
    • Autonomy
    • Confront conflict directly
    • Decisive
    • Competitive
    • Achievement oriented
    • Results oriented
    • High performance expectations
    • Aggressive
    • High pay for good performance
    • Working long hours
    • Having a good reputation
    • Being distinctive/different
    Innovative
    • Adaptable
    • Innovative
    • Quick to take advantage of opportunities
    • Risk taking
    • Opportunities for professional growth
    • Not constrained by rules
    • Tolerant
    • Informal
    • Enthusiastic
    Traditional
    • Stability
    • Reflective
    • Rule oriented
    • Analytical
    • High attention to detail
    • Organized
    • Clear guiding philosophy
    • Security of employment
    • Emphasis on quality
    • Focus on safety
    Cooperative
    • Team oriented
    • Fair
    • Praise for good performance
    • Supportive
    • Calm
    • Developing friends at work
    • Socially responsible

    Culture Considerations

    • What culture category was dominant for each IT organization?
    • Do you share the same dominant category?
    • Is your current dominant culture category the most ideal to have post-integration?

    3.1.5 Assess Culture

    3-4 hours

    Input: Cultural assessments for current IT organization, Cultural assessment for target IT organization

    Output: Goal for IT culture

    Materials: IT Culture Diagnostic, M&A Buy Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, IT employees of current organization, IT employees of target organization, Company M&A team

    The purpose of this activity is to assess the different cultures that might exist within the IT environments of both organizations. More importantly, your IT organization can select its desired IT culture for the long term if it does not already exist.

    1. Complete this activity by leveraging the blueprint Fix Your IT Culture, specifically the IT Culture Diagnostic. Fill out the diagnostic for the IT department in your organization:
      1. Answer the 16 questions in tab 2, Diagnostic.
      2. Find out your dominant culture and review recommendations in tab 3, Results.
    2. Document the results from tab 3, Results, in the M&A Buy Playbook if you are trying to record all artifacts related to the transaction in one place.
    3. Repeat the activity for the target organization.
    4. Leverage the information to determine what the goal for the culture of IT will be post-integration if it will differ from the current culture.

    Record the results in the M&A Buy Playbook.

    Due Diligence & Preparation

    Step 3.2

    Prepare to Integrate

    Activities

    • 3.2.1 Prioritize integration tasks
    • 3.2.2 Establish the integration roadmap
    • 3.2.3 Identify the needed workforce supply
    • 3.2.4 Estimate integration costs
    • 3.2.5 Create an employee transition plan
    • 3.2.6 Create functional workplans for employees
    • 3.2.7 Align project metrics with identified tasks

    This step involves the following participants:

    • IT executive/CIO
    • IT senior leadership
    • Transition team
    • Company M&A team

    Outcomes of Step

    Have an established plan of action toward integration across all domains and a strategy toward resources.

    Don’t underestimate the importance of integration preparation

    Integration is the process of combining the various components of one or more organizations into a single organization.

    80% of integration should happen within the first two years. (Source: CIO Dive)

    70% of M&A IT integrations fail due to components that could and should be addressed at the beginning. (Source: The Wall Street Journal, 2019)

    Info-Tech Insight

    Integration is not rationalization. Once the organization has integrated, it can prepare to rationalize the IT environment.

    Integration needs

    Identify your domain needs to support the target technology environment

    Set up a meeting with your IT due diligence team to:

    • Address data, applications, infrastructure, and other domain gaps.
    • Discuss the people and processes necessary to achieve the target technology environment and support M&A business objectives.

    Use this opportunity to:

    • Identify data and application complexities between your organization and the target organization.
    • Identify the IT people and process gaps, redundancies, and initiatives.
    • Determine your infrastructure needs and identify redundancies.
      • Does IT have the infrastructure to support the applications and business capabilities of the resultant enterprise?
      • Identify any gaps between the current infrastructure in both organizations and the infrastructure required in the resultant enterprise.
      • Identify any redundancies.
      • Determine the appropriate IT integration strategies.
    • Document your gaps, redundancies, initiatives, and assumptions to help you track and justify the initiatives that must be undertaken and help estimate the cost of integration.

    Integration implications

    Understand the implications for integration with respect to each target technology environment

    Domain

    Independent Models

    Create Links Between Critical Systems

    Move Key Capabilities to Common Systems

    Adopt One Model

    Data & Analytics

    • Consider data sources that might need to be combined (e.g. financials, email lists, internet).
    • Understand where each organization will warehouse its data and how it will be managed in a cost-effective manner.
    • Consider your reporting and transactional needs. Initially systems may remain separate, but eventually they will need to be merged.
    • Analyze whether or not the data types are compatible between companies.
    • Understand the critical data needs and the complexity of integration activities.
    • Consider your reporting and transactional needs. Initially systems may remain separate, but eventually they will need to be merged.
    • Focus on the master data domains that represent the core of your business.
    • Assess the value, size, location, and cleanliness of the target organization’s data sets.
    • Determine the data sets that will be migrated to capture expected synergies and drive core capabilities while addressing how other data sets will be maintained and managed.
    • Decide which applications to keep and which to terminate. This includes setting timelines for application retirement.
    • Establish interim linkages and common interfaces for applications while major migrations occur.

    Applications

    • Establish whether or not there are certain critical applications that still need to be linked (e.g. email, financials).
    • Leverage the unique strengths and functionalities provided by the applications used by each organization.
    • Confirm that adequate documentation and licensing exists.
    • Decide which critical applications need to be linked versus which need to be kept separate to drive synergies. For example, financial, email, and CRM may need to be linked, while certain applications may remain distinct.
    • Pay particular attention to the extent to which systems relating to customers, products, orders, and shipments need to be integrated.
    • Determine the key capabilities that require support from the applications identified by business process owners.
    • Assess which major applications need to be adopted by both organizations, based on the M&A goals.
    • Establish interim linkages and common interfaces for applications while major migrations occur.
    • Decide which applications to keep and which to terminate. This includes setting timelines for application retirement.
    • Establish interim linkages and common interfaces for applications while major migrations occur.

    Integration implications (continued)

    Understand the implications for integration with respect to each target technology environment

    Domain

    Independent Models

    Create Links Between Critical Systems

    Move Key Capabilities to Common Systems

    Adopt One Model

    Infrastructure

    • Assess the infrastructure demands created by retaining separate models (e.g. separate domains, voice, network integration).
    • Evaluate whether or not there are redundant data centers that could be consolidated to reduce costs.
    • Assess the infrastructure demands created by retaining separate models (e.g. separate domains, voice, network integration).
    • Evaluate whether or not there are redundant data centers that could be consolidated to reduce costs.
    • Evaluate whether certain infrastructure components, such as data centers, can be consolidated to support the new model while also eliminating redundancies. This will help reduce costs.
    • Assess which infrastructure components need to be kept versus which need to be terminated to support the new application portfolio. Keep in mind that increasing the transaction volume on a particular application increases the infrastructure capacity that is required for that application.
    • Extend the network to integrate additional locations.

    IT People & Processes

    • Retain workers from each IT department who possess knowledge of key products, services, and legacy systems.
    • Consider whether there are redundancies in staffing that could be eliminated.
    • The IT processes of each organization will most likely remain separate.
    • Consider the impact of the target organization on your IT processes.
    • Retain workers from each IT department who possess knowledge of key products, services, and legacy systems.
    • Consider whether there are redundancies in staffing that could be eliminated.
    • Consider how critical IT processes of the target organization fit with your current IT processes.
    • Identify which redundant staff members should be terminated by focusing on the key skills that will be necessary to support the common systems.
    • If there is overlap with the IT processes in both organizations, you may wish to map out both processes to get a sense for how they might work together.
    • Assess what processes will be prioritized to support IT strategies.
    • Identify which redundant staff members should be terminated by focusing on the key skills that will be necessary to support the prioritized IT processes.

    Integration implications (continued)

    Understand the implications for integration with respect to each target technology environment

    Domain

    Independent Models

    Create Links Between Critical Systems

    Move Key Capabilities to Common Systems

    Adopt One Model

    Leadership/IT Executive

    • Have insight into the goals and direction of the organization’s leadership. Make sure that a communication path has been established to receive information and provide feedback.
    • The decentralized model will require some form of centralization and strong governance processes to enable informed decisions.
    • Ensure that each area can deliver on its needs while not overstepping the goals and direction of the organization.
    • This will help with integration in the sense that front-line employees can see a single organization beginning to form.
    • In this model, there is the opportunity to select elements of each leadership style and strategy that will work for the larger organization.
    • Leadership can provide a single and unified approach to how the strategic goals will be executed.
    • More often than not, this would be the acquiring organization’s strategic direction.

    Vendors

    • Determine which contracts the target organization currently has in place.
    • Having different vendors in place will not be a bad model if it makes sense.
    • Spend time reviewing the contracts and ensuring that each organization has the right contracts to succeed.
    • Identify what redundancies might exist (ERPs, for example) and determine if the vendor would be willing to terminate one contract or another.
    • Through integration, it might be possible to engage in one set of contract negotiations for a single application or technology.
    • Identify whether there are opportunities to combine contracts or if they must remain completely separated until the end of the term.
    • In an effort to capitalize on the contracts working well, reduce the contracts that might be hindering the organization.
    • Speak to the vendor offering the contract.
    • Going forward, ensure the contracts are negotiated to include clauses to allow for easier and more cost-effective integration.

    Integration implications (continued)

    Understand the implications for integration with respect to each target technology environment

    Domain

    Independent Models

    Create Links Between Critical Systems

    Move Key Capabilities to Common Systems

    Adopt One Model

    Security

    • Both organizations would need to have a process for securing their organization.
    • Sharing and accessing information might be more difficult, as each organization would need to keep the other organization separate to ensure the organization remains secure.
    • Creating standard policies and procedures that each organization must adhere to would be critical here (for example, multifactor authentication).
    • Establish a single path of communication between the two organizations, ensuring reliable and secure data and information sharing.
    • Leverage the same solutions to protect the business as a whole from internal and external threats.
    • Identify opportunities where there might be user points of failure that could be addressed early in the process.
    • Determine what method of threat detection and response will best support the business and select that method to apply to the entire organization, both original and newly acquired.

    Projects

    • Projects remain ongoing as they were prior to the integration.
    • Some projects might be made redundant after the initial integration is over.
    • Re-evaluate the projects after integration to ensure they continue to deliver on the business’ strategic direction.
    • Determine which projects are similar to one another and identify opportunities to leverage business needs and solutions for each organization where possible.
    • Review project histories to determine the rationale for and success of projects that could be reused in either organization going forward.
    • Determine which projects should remain ongoing and which projects could wait to be implemented or could be completely stopped.
    • There might be certain modernization projects ongoing that cannot be stopped.
    • However, for all other projects, embrace a single portfolio.
    • Completely reduce or remove all ongoing projects from the one organization and continue with only the projects of the other organization.
    • Add in new projects when they arise as needed.

    3.2.1 Prioritize integration tasks

    2 hours

    Input: Integration tasks, Transition team, M&A RACI

    Output: Prioritized integration list

    Materials: Integration task checklist, Integration roadmap

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Company M&A team

    The purpose of this activity is to prioritize the different integration tasks that your organization has identified as necessary to this transaction. Some tasks might not be relevant for this particular transaction, and others might be critical.

    1. Download the SharePoint or Excel version of the M&A Integration Project Management Tool. Identify which integration tasks you want as part of your project plan. Alter or remove any tasks that are irrelevant to your organization. Add in tasks you think are missing.
    2. When deciding criticality of the task, consider the effect on stakeholders, those who are impacted or influenced in the process of the task, and dependencies (e.g. data strategy needs to be addressed first before you can tackle its dependencies, like data quality).
    3. Feel free to edit the way you measure criticality. The standard tool leverages a three-point scale. At the end, you should have a list of tasks in priority order based on criticality.

    Record the updates in the M&A Integration Project Management Tool (SharePoint).

    Record the updates in the M&A Integration Project Management Tool (Excel).

    Integration checklists

    Prerequisite Checklist
    • Build the project plan for integration and prioritize activities
      • Plan first day
      • Plan first 30/100 days
      • Plan first year
    • Create an organization-aligned IT strategy
    • Identify critical stakeholders
    • Create a communication strategy
    • Understand the rationale for the acquisition or purchase
    • Develop IT's purchasing strategy
    • Determine goal opportunities
    • Create the mission and vision statements
    • Create the guiding principles
    • Create program metrics
    • Consolidate reports from due diligence/data room
    • Conduct culture assessment
    • Create a transaction team
    • Assess workforce demand and supply
    • Plan and communicate potential layoffs
    • Create an employee transition plan
    • Identify the IT investment
    Business
    • Design an enterprise architecture
    • Document your business architecture
    • Identify and assess all of IT's risks
    Leadership/IT Executive
    • Build an IT budget
    • Structure operating budget
    • Structure capital budget
    • Identify the needed workforce demand vs. capacity
    • Establish and monitor key metrics
    • Communicate value realized/cost savings
    Data
    • Confirm data strategy
    • Confirm data governance
    • Data architecture
    • Data sources
    • Data storage (on-premises vs. cloud)
    • Enterprise content management
    • Compatibility of data types between organizations
    • Cleanliness/usability of target organization data sets
    • Identify data sets that need to be combined to capture synergies/drive core capabilities
    • Reporting and analytics capabilities
    Applications
    • Prioritize and address critical applications
      • ERP
      • CRM
      • Email
      • HRIS
      • Financial
      • Sales
      • Risk
      • Security
    • Leverage application rationalization framework to determine applications to keep, terminate, or create
    • Develop method of integrating applications
    • Model critical applications that have dependencies on one another
    • Identify the infrastructure capacity required to support critical applications
    Operations
    • Communicate helpdesk/service desk information
    • Manage sales access to customer data
    • Determine locations and hours of operation
    • Consolidate phone lists and extensions
    • Synchronize email address books

    Integration checklists (continued)

    Infrastructure
    • Determine single network access
    • Manage organization domains
    • Consolidate data centers
    • Compile inventory of vendors, versions, switches, and routers
    • Review hardware lease or purchase agreements
    • Review outsourcing/service provider agreements
    • Review service-level agreements
    • Assess connectivity linkages between locations
    • Plan to migrate to a single email system if necessary
    Vendors
    • Establish a sustainable vendor management office
    • Review vendor landscape
    • Identify warranty options
    • Rationalize vendor services and solutions
    • Identify opportunities to mature the security architecture
    People
    • Design an IT operating model
    • Redesign your IT organizational structure
    • Conduct a RACI
    • Conduct a culture assessment and identify goal IT culture
    • Build an IT employee engagement program
    • Determine critical roles and systems/process/products they support
    • Create a list of employees to be terminated
    • Create employee transition plans
    • Create functional workplans
    Projects
    • Stop duplicate or unnecessary target organization projects
    • Communicate project intake process
    • Prioritize projects
    Products & Services
    • Ensure customer services requirements are met
    • Ensure customer interaction requirements are met
    • Select a solution for product lifecycle management
    Security
    • Conduct a security assessment of target organization
    • Develop accessibility prioritization and schedule
    • Establish an information security strategy
    • Develop a security awareness and training program
    • Develop and manage security governance, risk, and compliance
    • Identify security budget
    • Build a data privacy and classification program
    IT Processes
    • Evaluate current process models
    • Determine productivity/capacity levels of processes
    • Identify processes to be terminated
    • Identify process expectations from target organization
    • Establish a communication plan
    • Develop a change management process
    • Establish/review IT policies

    3.2.2 Establish the integration roadmap

    2 hours

    Input: Prioritized integration tasks, Employee transition plan, Integration RACI, Costs for activities, Activity owners

    Output: Integration roadmap

    Materials: M&A Integration Project Plan Tool (SharePoint), M&A Integration Project Plan Tool (Excel)

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Transition team, Company M&A team

    The purpose of this activity is to create a roadmap to support IT throughout the integration process. Using the information gathered in previous activities, you can create a roadmap that will ensure a smooth integration.

    1. Leverage our M&A Integration Project Management Tool to track critical elements of the integration project. There are a few options available:
      1. Follow the instructions on the next slide if you are looking to upload our SharePoint project template.
      2. If you cannot or do not want to use SharePoint as your project management solution, download our Excel version of the tool.
        **Remember that this your tool, so customize to your liking.
    2. Identify who will own or be accountable for each of the integration tasks and establish the time frame for when each project should begin and end. This will confirm which tasks should be prioritized.

    Record the updates in the M&A Integration Project Management Tool (SharePoint).

    Record the updates in the M&A Integration Project Management Tool (Excel).

    Integration Project Management Tool (SharePoint Template)

    Follow these instructions to upload our template to your SharePoint environment

    1. Create or use an existing SP site.
    2. Download the M&A Integration Project Plan Tool (SharePoint) .wsp file from the Mergers & Acquisitions: The Buy Blueprint landing page.
    3. To import a template into your SharePoint environment, do the following:
      1. Open PowerShell.
      2. Connect-SPO Service (need to install PowerShell module).
      3. Enter in your tenant admin URL.
      4. Enter in your admin credentials.
      5. Set-SPO Site https://YourDomain.sharepoint.com/sites/YourSiteHe... -DenyAddAndCustomizePages 0
      OR
      1. Turn on both custom script features to allow users to run custom
    4. Screenshot of the 'Custom Script' option for importing a template into your SharePoint environment. Feature description reads 'Control whether users can run custom script on personal sites and self-service created sites. Note: changes to this setting might take up to 24 hours to take effect. For more information, see http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkIn=397546'. There are options to prevent or allow users from running custom script on personal/self-service created sites.
    5. Enable the SharePoint Server Standard Site Collection features.
    6. Upload the .wsp file in Solutions Gallery.
    7. Deploy by creating a subsite and select from custom options.
      • Allow or prevent custom script
      • Security considerations of allowing custom script
      • Save, download, and upload a SharePoint site as a template
    8. Refer to Microsoft documentation to understand security considerations and what is and isn’t supported:

    For more information, check out the SharePoint Template: Step-by-Step Deployment Guide.

    Participate in active workforce planning to transition employees

    The chosen IT operating model, primary M&A goals, and any planned changes to business strategy will dramatically impact IT staffing and workforce planning efforts.

    Visualization of the three aspects of 'IT workforce planning', as listed below.

    IT workforce planning

    • Primary M&A goals
      If the goal of the M&A is cost cutting, then workforce planning will be necessary to identify labor redundancies.
    • Changes to business strategy
      If business strategy will change after the merger, then workforce planning will typically be more involved than if business strategy will not change.
    • Integration strategy
      For independent models, workforce planning will typically be unnecessary.
      For connection of essential systems or absorption, workforce planning will likely be an involved, time-consuming process.
    1. Estimate the headcount you will need through the end of the M&A transition period.
    2. Outline the process you will use to assess staff for roles that have more than one candidate.
    3. Review employees in each department to determine the best fit for each role.
    4. Determine whether terminations will happen all together or in waves.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Don’t be a short-term thinker when it comes to workforce planning! IT teams that only consider the headcount needed on day one of the new entity will end up scrambling to find skilled resources to fill workforce gaps later in the transition period.

    3.2.3 Identify the needed workforce supply

    3-4 hours

    Input: IT strategy, Prioritized integration tasks

    Output: A clear indication of how many resources are required for each role and the number of resources that the organization actually has

    Materials: Resource Management Supply-Demand Calculator

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Target organization employees, Company M&A team, Transition team

    The purpose of this activity is to determine the anticipated amount of work that will be required to support projects (like integration), administrative, and keep-the-lights-on activities.

    1. Download the Resource Management Supply-Demand Calculator.
    2. The calculator requires minimal up-front staff participation: You can obtain meaningful results with participation from as few as one person with insight on the distribution of your resources and their average work week or month.
    3. The calculator will yield a report that shows a breakdown of your annual resource supply and demand, as well as the gap between the supply and demand. Further insight on project and non-project supply and demand are provided.
    4. Repeat the tool several times to identify the needs of your IT environment for day one, day 30/100, and year one. Anticipate that these will change over time. Also, do not forget to obtain this information from the target organization. Given that you will be integrating, it’s important to know how many staff they have in which roles.
    5. **For additional information, please review slides starting from slide 44 in Establish Realistic IT Resource Management Practices to see how to use the tool.

    Record the results in the Resource Management Supply-Demand Calculator.

    Resource Supply-Demand Calculator Output Example

    Example of a 'Resource Management Supply-Demand Analysis Report' with charts and tables measuring Annualized Resource Supply and Demand, Resource Capacity Confidence, Project Capacity, and combinations of those metrics.

    Resource Capacity Confidence. This figure is based on your confidence in supply confidence, demand stability, and the supply-demand ratio.

    Importance of estimating integration costs

    Change is the key driver of integration costs

    Integration costs are dependent on the following:
    • Meeting synergy targets – whether that be cost saving or growth related.
      • Employee-related costs, licensing, and reconfiguration fees play a huge part in meeting synergy targets.
    • Adjustments related to compliance or regulations – especially if there are changes to legal entities, reporting requirements, or risk-mitigation standards.
    • Governance or third party–related support required to ensure timelines are met and the integration is a success.
    Integration costs vary by industry type.
    • Certain industries may have integration costs made up of mostly one type, differing from other industries, due to the complexity and different demands of the transaction. For example:
      • Healthcare integration costs are mostly driven by regulatory, safety, and quality standards, as well as consolidation of the research and development function.
      • Energy and Utilities tend to have the lowest integration costs due to most transactions occurring within the same sector rather than as a cross-sector investment. For example, oil and gas acquisitions tend to be for oil fields and rigs (strategic fixed assets), which can easily be added to the buyer’s portfolio.

    Integration costs are more related to the degree of change required than the size of the transaction.

    3.2.4 Estimate integration costs

    3-4 hours

    Input: Integration tasks, Transition team, Valuation of current IT environment, Valuation of target IT environment, Outputs from data room, Technical debt, Employees

    Output: List of anticipated costs required to support IT integration

    Materials: Integration task checklist, Integration roadmap, M&A Buy Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Company M&A team, Transition team

    The purpose of this activity is to estimate the costs that will be associated with the integration. It’s important to ensure a realistic figure is identified and communicated to the larger M&A team within your company as early in the process as possible. This ensures that the funding required for the transaction is secured and budgeted for in the overarching transaction.

    1. On the associated slide in the M&A Buy Playbook, input:
      • Task
      • Domain
      • Cost type
      • Total cost amount
      • Level of certainty around the cost
    2. Provide a copy of the estimated costs to the company’s M&A team. Also provide any additional information identified earlier to help them understand the importance of those costs.

    Record the results in the M&A Buy Playbook.

    Employee transition planning

    Considering employee impact will be a huge component to ensure successful integration

    • Meet With Leadership
    • Plan Individual and Department Redeployment
    • Plan Individual and Department Layoffs
    • Monitor and Manage Departmental Effectiveness
    • For employees, the transition could mean:
      • Changing from their current role to a new role to meet requirements and expectations throughout the transition.
      • Being laid off because the role they are currently occupying has been made redundant.
    • It is important to plan for what the M&A integration needs will be and what the IT operational needs will be.
    • A lack of foresight into this long-term plan could lead to undue costs and headaches trying to retain critical staff, rehiring positions that were already let go, and keeping redundant employees longer then necessary.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Being transparent throughout the process is critical. Do not hesitate to tell employees the likelihood that their job may be made redundant. This will ensure a high level of trust and credibility for those who remain with the organization after the transaction.

    3.2.5 Create an employee transition plan

    3-4 hours

    Input: IT strategy, IT organizational design, Resource Supply-Demand Calculator output

    Output: Employee transition plans

    Materials: M&A Buy Playbook, Whiteboard, Sticky notes, Markers

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Company M&A team, Transition team

    The purpose of this activity is to create a transition plan for employees.

    1. Transition planning can be done at specific individual levels or more broadly to reflect a single role. Consider these four items in the transition plan:
      • Understand the direction of the employee transitions.
      • Identify employees that will be involved in the transition (moved or laid off).
      • Prepare to meet with employees.
      • Meet with employees.
    2. For each employee that will be facing some sort of change in their regular role, permanent or temporary, create a transition plan.
    3. For additional information on transitioning employees, review the blueprint Streamline Your Workforce During a Pandemic.

    **Note that if someone’s future role is a layoff, then there is no need to record anything for skills needed or method for skill development.

    Record the results in the M&A Buy Playbook.

    3.2.6 Create functional workplans for employees

    3-4 hours

    Input: Prioritized integration tasks, Employee transition plan, Integration RACI, Costs for activities, Activity owners

    Output: Employee functional workplans

    Materials: M&A Buy Playbook, Learning and development tools

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, IT management team, Company M&A team, Transition team

    The purpose of this activity is to create a functional workplan for the different employees so that they know what their key role and responsibilities are once the transaction occurs.

    1. First complete the transition plan from the previous activity (3.2.5) and the separation roadmap. Have these documents ready to review throughout this process.
    2. Identify the employees who will be transitioning to a new role permanently or temporarily. Creating a functional workplan is especially important for these employees.
    3. Identify the skills these employees need to have to support the separation. Record this in the corresponding slide in the M&A Buy Playbook.
    4. For each employee, identify someone who will be a point of contact for them throughout the transition.

    It is recommended that each employee have a functional workplan. Leverage the IT managers to support this task.

    Record the results in the M&A Buy Playbook.

    Metrics for integration

    Valuation & Due Diligence

    • % Defects discovered in production
    • $ Cost per user for enterprise applications
    • % In-house-built applications vs. enterprise applications
    • % Owners identified for all data domains
    • # IT staff asked to participate in due diligence
    • Change to due diligence
    • IT budget variance
    • Synergy target

    Execution & Value Realization

    • % Satisfaction with the effectiveness of IT capabilities
    • % Overall end-customer satisfaction
    • $ Impact of vendor SLA breaches
    • $ Savings through cost-optimization efforts
    • $ Savings through application rationalization and technology standardization
    • # Key positions empty
    • % Frequency of staff turnover
    • % Emergency changes
    • # Hours of unplanned downtime
    • % Releases that cause downtime
    • % Incidents with identified problem record
    • % Problems with identified root cause
    • # Days from problem identification to root cause fix
    • % Projects that consider IT risk
    • % Incidents due to issues not addressed in the security plan
    • # Average vulnerability remediation time
    • % Application budget spent on new build/buy vs. maintenance (deferred feature implementation, enhancements, bug fixes)
    • # Time (days) to value realization
    • % Projects that realized planned benefits
    • $ IT operational savings and cost reductions that are related to synergies/divestitures
    • % IT staff–related expenses/redundancies
    • # Days spent on IT integration
    • $ Accurate IT budget estimates
    • % Revenue growth directly tied to IT delivery
    • % Profit margin growth

    3.2.7 Align project metrics with identified tasks

    3-4 hours

    Input: Prioritized integration tasks, Employee transition plan, Integration RACI, Costs for activities, Activity owners, M&A goals

    Output: Integration-specific metrics to measure success

    Materials: Roadmap template, M&A Buy Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Transition team

    The purpose of this activity is to understand how to measure the success of the integration project by aligning metrics to each identified task.

    1. Review the M&A goals identified by the business. Your metrics will need to tie back to those business goals.
    2. Identify metrics that align to identified tasks and measure achievement of those goals. For each metric you consider, ask the following questions:
      • What is the main goal or objective that this metric is trying to solve?
      • What does success look like?
      • Does the metric promote the right behavior?
      • Is the metric actionable? What is the story you are trying to tell with this metric?
      • How often will this get measured?
      • Are there any metrics it supports or is supported by?

    Record the results in the M&A Buy Playbook.

    By the end of this mid-transaction phase you should:

    Have successfully evaluated the target organization’s IT environment, escalated the acquisition risks and benefits, and prepared IT for integration.

    Key outcomes from the Due Diligence & Preparation phase
    • Participate in due diligence activities to accurately valuate the target organization(s) and determine if there are critical risks or benefits the current organization should be aware of.
    • Create an integration roadmap that considers the tasks that will need to be completed and the resources required to support integration.
    Key deliverables from the Due Diligence & Preparation phase
    • Establish a due diligence charter
    • Create a list of data room artifacts and engage in due diligence
    • Assess the target organization’s technical debt
    • Valuate the target IT organization
    • Assess and plan for culture
    • Prioritize integration tasks
    • Establish the integration roadmap
    • Identify the needed workforce supply
    • Estimate integration costs
    • Create employee transition plans
    • Create functional workplans for employees
    • Align project metrics with identified tasks

    M&A Buy Blueprint

    Phase 4

    Execution & Value Realization

    Phase 1Phase 2Phase 3

    Phase 4

    • 1.1 Identify Stakeholders and Their Perspective of IT
    • 1.2 Assess IT’s Current Value and Future State
    • 1.3 Drive Innovation and Suggest Growth Opportunities
    • 2.1 Establish the M&A Program Plan
    • 2.2 Prepare IT to Engage in the Acquisition
    • 3.1 Assess the Target Organization
    • 3.2 Prepare to Integrate
    • 4.1 Execute the Transaction
    • 4.2 Reflection and Value Realization

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Rationalize the IT environment
    • Continually update the project plan
    • Confirm integration costs
    • Review IT’s transaction value
    • Conduct a transaction and integration SWOT
    • Review the playbook and prepare for future transactions

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • IT executive/CIO
    • IT senior leadership
    • Vendor management team
    • IT transaction team
    • Company M&A team

    Workshop Overview

    Contact your account representative for more information.
    workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8889

    Pre-Work

    Day 1

    Day 2

    Day 3

    Engage in Integration

    Day 4

    Establish the Transaction FoundationDiscover the Motivation for IntegrationPlan the Integration RoadmapPrepare Employees for the TransitionEngage in IntegrationAssess the Transaction Outcomes (Must be within 30 days of transaction date)

    Activities

    • 0.1 Understand the rationale for the company's decisions to pursue an acquisition.
    • 0.2 Identify key stakeholders and determine the IT transaction team.
    • 0.3 Gather and evaluate the M&A strategy, future-state operating model, and governance.
    • 1.1 Review the business rationale for the acquisition.
    • 1.2 Identify pain points and opportunities tied to the acquisition.
    • 1.3 Establish the integration strategy.
    • 1.4 Prioritize Integration tasks.
    • 2.1 Establish the integration roadmap.
    • 2.2 Establish and align project metrics with identified tasks.
    • 2.3 Estimate integration costs.
    • 3.1 Assess the current culture and identify the goal culture.
    • 3.2 Identify the needed workforce supply.
    • 3.3 Create an employee transition plan.
    • 3.4 Create functional workplans for employees.
    • I.1 Complete the integration by regularly updating the project plan.
    • I.2 Begin to rationalize the IT environment where possible and necessary.
    • 4.1 Confirm integration costs.
    • 4.2 Review IT’s transaction value.
    • 4.3 Conduct a transaction and integration SWOT.
    • 4.4 Review the playbook and prepare for future transactions.

    Deliverables

    1. IT strategy
    2. IT operating model
    3. IT governance structure
    4. M&A transaction team
    1. Business context implications for IT
    2. Integration strategy
    1. Integration roadmap and associated resourcing
    1. Culture assessment
    2. Workforce supply identified
    3. Employee transition plan
    1. Rationalized IT environment
    2. Updated integration project plan
    1. SWOT of transaction
    2. M&A Buy Playbook refined for future transactions

    What is the Execution & Value Realization phase?

    Post-transaction state

    Once the transaction comes to a close, it’s time for IT to deliver on the critical integration tasks. Set the organization up for success by having an integration roadmap. Retaining critical IT staff throughout this process will also be imperative to the overall transaction success.

    Throughout the integration process, roadblocks will arise and need to be addressed. However, by ensuring that employees, technology, and processes are planned for ahead of the transaction, you as IT will be able to weather those unexpected concerns with greater ease.

    Now that you as an IT leader have engaged in an acquisition, demonstrating the value IT was able to provide to the process is critical to establishing a positive and respected relationship with other senior leaders in the business. Be prepared to identify the positives and communicate this value to advance the business’ perception of IT.

    Goal: To carry out the planned integration activities and deliver the intended value to the business

    Execution Prerequisite Checklist

    Before coming into the Execution & Value Realization phase, you must have addressed the following:

    • Understand the rationale for the company's decisions to pursue an acquisition and what opportunities or pain points the acquisition should alleviate.
    • Identify the key roles for the transaction team.
    • Identify the M&A governance.
    • Determine target metrics and align to project tasks.
    • Select an integration strategy framework.
    • Conduct a RACI for key transaction tasks for the transaction team.
    • Create a list of data room artifacts and engage in due diligence (directly or indirectly).
    • Prioritize integration tasks.
    • Establish the integration roadmap.
    • Identify the needed workforce supply.
    • Create employee transition plans.

    Before coming into the Execution & Value Realization phase, we recommend addressing the following:

    • Create vision and mission statements.
    • Establish guiding principles.
    • Create a future-state operating model.
    • Identify the M&A operating model.
    • Document the communication plan.
    • Examine the business perspective of IT.
    • Identify key stakeholders and outline their relationship to the M&A process.
    • Be able to valuate the IT environment and communicate IT's value to the business.
    • Establish a due diligence charter.
    • Assess the target organization’s technical debt.
    • Valuate the target IT organization.
    • Assess and plan for culture.
    • Estimate integration costs.
    • Create functional workplans for employees.

    Integration checklists

    Prerequisite Checklist
    • Build the project plan for integration and prioritize activities
      • Plan first day
      • Plan first 30/100 days
      • Plan first year
    • Create an organization-aligned IT strategy
    • Identify critical stakeholders
    • Create a communication strategy
    • Understand the rationale for the acquisition or purchase
    • Develop IT's purchasing strategy
    • Determine goal opportunities
    • Create the mission and vision statements
    • Create the guiding principles
    • Create program metrics
    • Consolidate reports from due diligence/data room
    • Conduct culture assessment
    • Create a transaction team
    • Assess workforce demand and supply
    • Plan and communicate potential layoffs
    • Create an employee transition plan
    • Identify the IT investment
    Business
    • Design an enterprise architecture
    • Document your business architecture
    • Identify and assess all of IT's risks
    Leadership/IT Executive
    • Build an IT budget
    • Structure operating budget
    • Structure capital budget
    • Identify the needed workforce demand vs. capacity
    • Establish and monitor key metrics
    • Communicate value realized/cost savings
    Data
    • Confirm data strategy
    • Confirm data governance
    • Data architecture
    • Data sources
    • Data storage (on-premises vs. cloud)
    • Enterprise content management
    • Compatibility of data types between organizations
    • Cleanliness/usability of target organization data sets
    • Identify data sets that need to be combined to capture synergies/drive core capabilities
    • Reporting and analytics capabilities
    Applications
    • Prioritize and address critical applications
      • ERP
      • CRM
      • Email
      • HRIS
      • Financial
      • Sales
      • Risk
      • Security
    • Leverage application rationalization framework to determine applications to keep, terminate, or create
    • Develop method of integrating applications
    • Model critical applications that have dependencies on one another
    • Identify the infrastructure capacity required to support critical applications
    Operations
    • Communicate helpdesk/service desk information
    • Manage sales access to customer data
    • Determine locations and hours of operation
    • Consolidate phone lists and extensions
    • Synchronize email address books

    Integration checklists (continued)

    Infrastructure
    • Determine single network access
    • Manage organization domains
    • Consolidate data centers
    • Compile inventory of vendors, versions, switches, and routers
    • Review hardware lease or purchase agreements
    • Review outsourcing/service provider agreements
    • Review service-level agreements
    • Assess connectivity linkages between locations
    • Plan to migrate to a single email system if necessary
    Vendors
    • Establish a sustainable vendor management office
    • Review vendor landscape
    • Identify warranty options
    • Rationalize vendor services and solutions
    • Identify opportunities to mature the security architecture
    People
    • Design an IT operating model
    • Redesign your IT organizational structure
    • Conduct a RACI
    • Conduct a culture assessment and identify goal IT culture
    • Build an IT employee engagement program
    • Determine critical roles and systems/process/products they support
    • Create a list of employees to be terminated
    • Create employee transition plans
    • Create functional workplans
    Projects
    • Stop duplicate or unnecessary target organization projects
    • Communicate project intake process
    • Prioritize projects
    Products & Services
    • Ensure customer services requirements are met
    • Ensure customer interaction requirements are met
    • Select a solution for product lifecycle management
    Security
    • Conduct a security assessment of target organization
    • Develop accessibility prioritization and schedule
    • Establish an information security strategy
    • Develop a security awareness and training program
    • Develop and manage security governance, risk, and compliance
    • Identify security budget
    • Build a data privacy and classification program
    IT Processes
    • Evaluate current process models
    • Determine productivity/capacity levels of processes
    • Identify processes to be terminated
    • Identify process expectations from target organization
    • Establish a communication plan
    • Develop a change management process
    • Establish/review IT policies

    Execution & Value Realization

    Step 4.1

    Execute the Transaction

    Activities

    • 4.1.1 Rationalize the IT environment
    • 4.1.2 Continually update the project plan

    This step involves the following participants:

    • IT executive/CIO
    • IT senior leadership
    • Vendor management team
    • IT transaction team
    • Company M&A team

    Outcomes of Step

    Successfully execute on the integration and strategize how to rationalize the two (or more) IT environments and update the project plan, strategizing against any roadblocks as they might come.

    Compile –› Assess –› Rationalize

    Access to critical information often does not happen until day one

    • As the transaction comes to a close and the target organization becomes the acquired organization, it’s important to start working on the rationalization of your organization.
    • One of the most important elements will be to have a complete understanding of the acquired organization’s IT environment. Specifically, assess the technology, people, and processes that might exist.
    • This rationalization will be heavily dependent on your planned integration strategy determined in the Discovery & Strategy phase of the process.
    • If your IT organization was not involved until after that phase, then determine whether your organization plans on remaining in its original state, taking on the acquired organization’s state, or forming a best-of-breed state by combining elements.
    • To execute on this, however, a holistic understanding of the new IT environment is required.

    Some Info-Tech resources to support this initiative:

    • Reduce and Manage Your Organization’s Insider Threat Risk
    • Build an Application Rationalization Framework
    • Rationalize Your Collaboration Tools
    • Consolidate IT Asset Management
    • Build Effective Enterprise Integration on the Back of Business Process
    • Consolidate Your Data Centers

    4.1.1 Rationalize the IT environment

    6-12 months

    Input: RACI chart, List of critical applications, List of vendor contracts, List of infrastructure assets, List of data assets

    Output: Rationalized IT environment

    Materials: Software Terms & Conditions Evaluation Tool

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Vendor management

    The purpose of this activity is to rationalize the IT environment to reduce and eliminate redundant technology.

    1. Compile a list of the various applications and vendor contracts from the acquired organization and the original organization.
    2. Determine where there is repetition. Have a member of the vendor management team review those contracts and identify cost-saving opportunities.

    This will not be a quick and easy activity to complete. It will require strong negotiation on the behalf of the vendor management team.

    For additional information and support for this activity, see the blueprint Master Contract Review and Negotiations for Software Agreements.

    4.1.2 Continually update the project plan

    Reoccurring basis following transition

    Input: Prioritized integration tasks, Integration RACI, Activity owners

    Output: Updated integration project plan

    Materials: M&A Integration Project Management Tool

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, IT transaction team, Company M&A team

    The purpose of this activity is to ensure that the project plan is continuously updated as your transaction team continues to execute on the various components outlined in the project plan.

    1. Set a regular cadence for the transaction team to meet, update and review the status of the various integration task items, and strategize how to overcome any roadblocks.
    2. Employ governance best practices in these meetings to ensure decisions can be made effectively and resources allocated strategically.

    Record the updates in the M&A Integration Project Management Tool (SharePoint).

    Record the updates in the M&A Integration Project Management Tool (Excel).

    Execution & Value Realization

    Step 4.2

    Reflection and Value Realization

    Activities

    • 4.2.1 Confirm integration costs
    • 4.2.2 Review IT’s transaction value
    • 4.2.3 Conduct a transaction and integration SWOT
    • 4.2.4 Review the playbook and prepare for future transactions

    This step involves the following participants:

    • IT executive/CIO
    • IT senior leadership
    • Transition team
    • Company M&A team

    Outcomes of Step

    Review the value that IT was able to generate around the transaction and strategize on how to improve future acquisition transactions.

    4.2.1 Confirm integration costs

    3-4 hours

    Input: Integration tasks, Transition team, Previous RACI, Estimated costs

    Output: Actual integration costs

    Materials: M&A Buy Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, IT transaction team, Company M&A team

    The purpose of this activity is to confirm the associated costs around integration. While the integration costs would have been estimated previously, it’s important to confirm the costs that were associated with the integration in order to provide an accurate and up-to-date report to the company’s M&A team.

    1. Taking all the original items identified previously in activity 3.2.4, identify if there were changes in the estimated costs. This can be an increase or a decrease.
    2. Ensure that each cost has a justification for why the cost changed from the original estimation.

    Record the results in the M&A Buy Playbook.

    Track synergy capture through the IT integration

    The ultimate goal of the M&A is to achieve and deliver deal objectives. Early in the M&A, IT must identify, prioritize, and execute upon synergies that deliver value to the business and its shareholders. Continue to measure IT’s contribution toward achieving the organization’s M&A goals throughout the integration by keeping track of cost savings and synergies that have been achieved. When these achievements happen, communicate them and celebrate success.

    1. Define Synergy Metrics: Select metrics to track synergies through the integration.
      1. You can track value by looking at percentages of improvement in process-level metrics depending on the synergies being pursued.
      2. For example, if the synergy being pursued is increasing asset utilization, metrics could range from capacity to revenue generated through increased capacity.
    2. Prioritize Synergistic Initiatives: Estimate the cost and benefit of each initiative's implementation to compare the amount of business value to the cost. The benefits and costs should be illustrated at a high level. Estimating the exact dollar value of fulfilling a synergy can be difficult and misleading.
        Steps
      • Determine the benefits that each initiative is expected to deliver.
      • Determine the high-level costs of implementation (capacity, time, resources, effort).
    3. Track Synergy Captures: Develop a detailed workplan to resource the roadmap and track synergy captures as the initiatives are undertaken.

    Once 80% of the necessary synergies are realized, executive pressure will diminish. However, IT must continue to work toward the technology end state to avoid delayed progression.

    4.2.2 Review IT’s transaction value

    3-4 hours

    Input: Prioritized integration tasks, Integration RACI, Activity owners, M&A company goals

    Output: Transaction value

    Materials: M&A Buy Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Company's M&A team

    The purpose of this activity is to track how your IT organization performed against the originally identified metrics.

    1. If your organization did not have the opportunity to identify metrics earlier, determine from the company M&A team what those metrics might be. Review activity 3.2.7 for more information on metrics.
    2. Identify whether the metric (which should be used to support a goal) was at, below, or above the original target metric. This is a very critical task for IT to complete because it allows IT to confirm that they were successful engaging in the transaction and that the business can count on them in future transactions.
    3. Be sure to record accurate and relevant information on why the outcomes (good or bad) are supporting the M&A goals that were set out by the business.

    Record the results in the M&A Buy Playbook.

    4.2.3 Conduct a transaction and integration SWOT

    2 hours

    Input: Integration costs, Retention rates, Value IT contributed to the transaction

    Output: Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats

    Materials: Flip charts, Markers, Sticky notes

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Business transaction team

    The purpose of this activity is to assess the positive and negative elements of the transaction.

    1. Consider the various internal and external elements that could have impacted the outcome of the transaction.
      • Strengths. Internal characteristics that are favorable as they relate to your development environment.
      • Weaknesses Internal characteristics that are unfavorable or need improvement.
      • Opportunities External characteristics that you may use to your advantage.
      • Threats External characteristics that may be potential sources of failure or risk.

    Record the results in the M&A Buy Playbook.

    M&A Buy Playbook review

    With an acquisition complete, your IT organization is now more prepared then ever to support the business through future M&As

    • Now that the transaction is more than 80% complete, take the opportunity to review the key elements that worked well and the opportunities for improvement in future transactions.
    • Critically examine the M&A Buy Playbook your IT organization created and identify what worked well to help the transaction and where your organization could adjust to do better in future transactions.
    • If your organization were to engage in another acquisition under your IT leadership, how would you go about the transaction to make sure the company meets its goals?

    4.2.4 Review the playbook and prepare for future transactions

    4 hours

    Input: Transaction and integration SWOT

    Output: Refined M&A playbook

    Materials: M&A Buy Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO

    The purpose of this activity is to revise the playbook and ensure it is ready to go for future transactions.

    1. Using the outputs from the previous activity, 4.2.3, determine what strengths and opportunities there were that should be leveraged in the next transaction.
    2. Likewise, determine which threats and weaknesses could be avoided in the future transactions.
      Remember, this is your M&A Buy Playbook, and it should reflect the most successful outcome for you in your organization.

    Record the results in the M&A Buy Playbook.

    By the end of this post-transaction phase you should:

    Have completed the integration post-transaction and be fluidly delivering the critical value that the business expected of IT.

    Key outcomes from the Execution & Value Realization phase
    • Ensure the integration tasks are being completed and that any blockers related to the transaction are being removed.
    • Determine where IT was able to realize value for the business and demonstrate IT’s involvement in meeting target goals.
    Key deliverables from the Execution & Value Realization phase
    • Rationalize the IT environment
    • Continually update the project plan for completion
    • Confirm integration costs
    • Review IT’s transaction value
    • Conduct a transaction and integration SWOT
    • Review the playbook and prepare for future transactions

    Summary of Accomplishment

    Problem Solved

    Congratulations, you have completed the M&A Buy Blueprint!

    Rather than reacting to a transaction, you have been proactive in tackling this initiative. You now have a process to fall back on in which you can be an innovative IT leader by suggesting how and why the business should engage in an acquisition. You now have:

    • Created a standardized approach for how your IT organization should address acquisitions.
    • Evaluated the target organizations successfully and established an integration project plan.
    • Delivered on the integration project plan successfully and communicated IT’s transaction value to the business.

    Now that you have done all of this, reflect on what went well and what can be improved in case if you have to do this all again in a future transaction.

    If you would like additional support, have our analysts guide you through other phases as part of an Info-Tech workshop.

    Contact your account representative for more information
    workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8899

    Research Contributors and Experts

    Ibrahim Abdel-Kader
    Research Analyst | CIO
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Brittany Lutes
    Senior Research Analyst | CIO
    Info-Tech Research Group
    John Annand
    Principal Research Director | Infrastructure
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Scott Bickley
    Principal Research Director | Vendor Management
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Cole Cioran
    Practice Lead | Applications
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Dana Daher
    Research Analyst | Strategy & Innovation
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Eric Dolinar
    Manager | M&A Consulting
    Deloitte Canada
    Christoph Egel
    Director, Solution Design & Deliver
    Cooper Tire & Rubber Company
    Nora Fisher
    Vice President | Executive Services Advisory
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Larry Fretz
    Vice President | Industry
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Research Contributors and Experts

    David Glazer
    Vice President of Analytics
    Kroll
    Jack Hakimian
    Senior Vice President | Workshops and Delivery
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Gord Harrison
    Senior Vice President | Research & Advisory
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Valence Howden
    Principal Research Director | CIO
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Jennifer Jones
    Research Director | Industry
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Nancy McCuaig
    Senior Vice President | Chief Technology and Data Office
    IGM Financial Inc.
    Carlene McCubbin
    Practice Lead | CIO
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Kenneth McGee
    Research Fellow | Strategy & Innovation
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Nayma Naser
    Associate
    Deloitte
    Andy Neill
    Practice Lead | Data & Analytics, Enterprise Architecture
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Research Contributors and Experts

    Rick Pittman
    Vice President | Research
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Rocco Rao
    Research Director | Industry
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Mark Rosa
    Senior Vice President & Chief Information Officer
    Mohegan Gaming and Entertainment
    Tracy-Lynn Reid
    Research Lead | People & Leadership
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Jim Robson
    Senior Vice President | Shared Enterprise Services (retired)
    Great-West Life
    Steven Schmidt
    Senior Managing Partner Advisory | Executive Services
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Nikki Seventikidis
    Senior Manager | Finance Initiative & Continuous Improvement
    CST Consultants Inc.
    Allison Straker
    Research Director | CIO
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Justin Waelz
    Senior Network & Systems Administrator
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Sallie Wright
    Executive Counselor
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Bibliography

    “5 Ways for CIOs to Accelerate Value During Mergers and Acquisitions.” Okta, n.d. Web.

    Altintepe, Hakan. “Mergers and acquisitions speed up digital transformation.” CIO.com, 27 July 2018. Web.

    “America’s elite law firms are booming.” The Economist, 15 July 2021. Web.

    Barbaglia, Pamela, and Joshua Franklin. “Global M&A sets Q1 record as dealmakers shape post-COVID world.” Nasdaq, 1 April 2021. Web.

    Boyce, Paul. “Mergers and Acquisitions Definition: Types, Advantages, and Disadvantages.” BoyceWire, 8 Oct. 2020. Web.

    Bradt, George. “83% Of Mergers Fail -- Leverage A 100-Day Action Plan For Success Instead.” Forbes, 27 Jan. 2015. Web.

    Capgemini. “Mergers and Acquisitions: Get CIOs, IT Leaders Involved Early.” Channel e2e, 19 June 2020. Web.

    Chandra, Sumit, et al. “Make Or Break: The Critical Role Of IT In Post-Merger Integration.” IMAA Institute, 2016. Web.

    Deloitte. “How to Calculate Technical Debt.” The Wall Street Journal, 21 Jan. 2015. Web.

    Ernst & Young. “IT As A Driver Of M&A Success.” IMAA Institute, 2017. Web.

    Fernandes, Nuno. “M&As In 2021: How To Improve The Odds Of A Successful Deal.” Forbes, 23 March 2021. Web.

    “Five steps to a better 'technology fit' in mergers and acquisitions.” BCS, 7 Nov. 2019. Web.

    Fricke, Pierre. “The Biggest Opportunity You’re Missing During an M&Aamp; IT Integration.” Rackspace, 4 Nov. 2020. Web.

    Garrison, David W. “Most Mergers Fail Because People Aren't Boxes.” Forbes, 24 June 2019. Web.

    Harroch, Richard. “What You Need To Know About Mergers & Acquisitions: 12 Key Considerations When Selling Your Company.” Forbes, 27 Aug. 2018. Web.

    Hope, Michele. “M&A Integration: New Ways To Contain The IT Cost Of Mergers, Acquisitions And Migrations.” Iron Mountain, n.d. Web.

    “How Agile Project Management Principles Can Modernize M&A.” Business.com, 13 April 2020. Web.

    Hull, Patrick. “Answer 4 Questions to Get a Great Mission Statement.” Forbes, 10 Jan. 2013. Web.

    Kanter, Rosabeth Moss. “What We Can Learn About Unity from Hostile Takeovers.” Harvard Business Review, 12 Nov. 2020. Web.

    Koller, Tim, et al. “Valuation: Measuring and Managing the Value of Companies, 7th edition.” McKinsey & Company, 2020. Web.

    Labate, John. “M&A Alternatives Take Center Stage: Survey.” The Wall Street Journal, 30 Oct. 2020. Web.

    Lerner, Maya Ber. “How to Calculate ROI on Infrastructure Automation.” DevOps.com, 1 July 2020. Web.

    Loten, Angus. “Companies Without a Tech Plan in M&A Deals Face Higher IT Costs.” The Wall Street Journal, 18 June 2019. Web.

    Low, Jia Jen. “Tackling the tech integration challenge of mergers today” Tech HQ, 6 Jan. 2020. Web.

    Lucas, Suzanne. “5 Reasons Turnover Should Scare You.” Inc. 22 March 2013. Web.

    “M&A Trends Survey: The future of M&A. Deal trends in a changing world.” Deloitte, Oct. 2020. Web.

    Maheshwari, Adi, and Manish Dabas. “Six strategies tech companies are using for successful divesting.” EY, 1 Aug. 2020. Web.

    Majaski, Christina. “Mergers and Acquisitions: What's the Difference?” Investopedia, 30 Apr. 2021.

    “Mergers & Acquisitions: Top 5 Technology Considerations.” Teksetra, 21 Jul. 2020. Web.

    “Mergers Acquisitions M&A Process.” Corporate Finance Institute, n.d. Web.

    “Mergers and acquisitions: A means to gain technology and expertise.” DLA Piper, 2020. Web.

    Nash, Kim S. “CIOs Take Larger Role in Pre-IPO Prep Work.” The Wall Street Journal, 5 March 2015. Web.

    Paszti, Laila. “Canada: Emerging Trends In Information Technology (IT) Mergers And Acquisitions.” Mondaq, 24 Oct. 2019. Web.

    Patel, Kiison. “The 8 Biggest M&A Failures of All Time” Deal Room, 9 Sept. 2021. Web.

    Peek, Sean, and Paula Fernandes. “What Is a Vision Statement?” Business News Daily, 7 May 2020. Web.

    Ravid, Barak. “Tech execs focus on growth amid increasingly competitive M&A market.” EY, 28 April 2021. Web.

    Resch, Scott. “5 Questions with a Mergers & Acquisitions Expert.” CIO, 25 June 2019. Web.

    Salsberg, Brian. “Four tips for estimating one-time M&A integration costs.” EY, 17 Oct. 2019. Web.

    Samuels, Mark. “Mergers and acquisitions: Five ways tech can smooth the way.” ZDNet, 15 Aug. 2018. Web.

    “SAP Divestiture Projects: Options, Approach and Challenges.” Cognizant, May, 2014. Web.

    Steeves, Dave. “7 Rules for Surviving a Merger & Acquisition Technology Integration.” Steeves and Associates, 5 Feb. 2020. Web.

    Tanaszi, Margaret. “Calculating IT Value in Business Terms.” CSO, 27 May 2004. Web.

    “The CIO Playbook. Nine Steps CIOs Must Take For Successful Divestitures.” SNP, 2016. Web.

    “The Role of IT in Supporting Mergers and Acquisitions.” Cognizant, Feb. 2015. Web.

    Torres, Roberto. “M&A playbook: How to prepare for the cost, staff and tech hurdles.” CIO Dive, 14 Nov. 2019. Web.

    “Valuation Methods.” Corporate Finance Institute, n.d. Web.

    Weller, Joe. “The Ultimate Guide to the M&A Process for Buyers and Sellers.” Smartsheet, 16 May 2019. Web.

    Considerations for a Hub and Spoke Model When Deploying Infrastructure in the Cloud

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}472|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Cloud Strategy
    • Parent Category Link: /cloud-strategy
    • The organization is planning to move resources to cloud or devise a networking strategy for their existing cloud infrastructure to harness value from cloud.
    • The right topology needs to be selected to deploy network level isolation, design the cloud for management efficiencies and provide access to shared services on cloud.
    • A perennial challenge for infrastructure on cloud is planning for governance vs flexibility which is often overlooked.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    Don’t wait until the necessity arises to evaluate your networking in the cloud. Get ahead of the curve and choose the topology that optimizes benefits and supports organizational needs in the present and the future.

    Impact and Result

    • Define organizational needs and understand the pros and cons of cloud network topologies to strategize for the networking design.
    • Consider the layered complexities of addressing the governance vs. flexibility spectrum for your domains when designing your networks.

    Considerations for a Hub and Spoke Model When Deploying Infrastructure in the Cloud Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Considerations for a Hub and Spoke Model When Deploying Infrastructure in the Cloud Deck – A document to guide you through designing your network in the cloud.

    What cloud networking topology should you use? How do you provide access to shared resources in the cloud or hybrid infrastructure? What sits in the hub and what sits in the spoke?

    • Considerations for a Hub and Spoke Model When Deploying Infrastructure in the Cloud Storyboard
    [infographic]

    Further reading

    Considerations for a Hub and Spoke Model When Deploying Infrastructure in the Cloud

    Don't revolve around a legacy design; choose a network design that evolves with the organization.

    Analyst Perspective

    Cloud adoption among organizations increases gradually across both the number of services used and the amount those services are used. However, network builders tend to overlook the vulnerabilities of network topologies, which leads to complications down the road, especially since the structures of cloud network topologies are not all of the same quality. A network design that suits current needs may not be the best solution for the future state of the organization.

    Even if on-prem network strategies were retained for ease of migration, it is important to evaluate and identify the cloud network topology that can not only elevate the performance of your infrastructure in the cloud, but also that can make it easier to manage and provision resources.

    An "as the need arises" strategy will not work efficiently since changing network designs will change the way data travels within your network, which will then need to be adopted to existing application architectures. This becomes more complicated as the number of services hosted in the cloud grows.

    Keep a network strategy in place early on and start designing your infrastructure accordingly. This gives you more control over your networks and eliminates the need for huge changes to your infrastructure down the road.

    This is a picture of Nitin Mukesh

    Nitin Mukesh
    Senior Research Analyst, Infrastructure and Operations
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    The organization is planning to move resources to the cloud or devise a networking strategy for their existing cloud infrastructure to harness value from the cloud.

    The right topology needs to be selected to deploy network level isolation, design the cloud for management efficiencies, and provide access to shared services in the cloud.

    A perennial challenge for infrastructure in the cloud is planning for governance vs. flexibility, which is often overlooked.

    Common Obstacles

    The choice of migration method may result in retaining existing networking patterns and only making changes when the need arises.

    Networking in the cloud is still new, and organizations new to the cloud may not be aware of the cloud network designs they can consider for their business needs.

    Info-Tech's Approach

    Define organizational needs and understand the pros and cons of cloud network topologies to strategize for the networking design.

    Consider the layered complexities of addressing the governance vs. flexibility spectrum for your domains when designing your networks.

    Insight Summary

    Don't wait until the necessity arises to evaluate your networking in the cloud. Get ahead of the curve and choose the topology that optimizes benefits and supports organizational needs in the present and future.

    Your challenge

    Selecting the right topology: Many organizations migrate to the cloud retaining a mesh networking topology from their on-prem design, or they choose to implement the mesh design leveraging peering technologies in the cloud without a strategy in place for when business needs change. While there may be many network topologies for on-prem infrastructure, the network design team may not be aware of the best approach in cloud platforms for their requirements, or a cloud networking strategy may even go overlooked during the migration.

    Finding the right cloud networking infrastructure for:

    • Management efficiencies
    • Network-level isolation of resources
    • Access to shared services

    Deciding between governance and flexibility in networking design: In the hub and spoke model, if a domain is in the hub, the greater the governance over it, and if it sits in the spoke, the higher the flexibility. Having a strategy for the most important domains is key. For example, some security belongs in the hub and some security belongs in the spoke. The tradeoff here is if it sits completely in the spoke, you give it a lot of freedom, but it becomes harder to standardize across the organization.

    Mesh network topology

    A mesh is a design where virtual private clouds (VPCs) are connected to each other individually creating a mesh network. The network traffic is fast and can be redirected since the nodes in the network are interconnected. There is no hierarchical relationship between the networks, and any two networks can connect with each other directly.

    In the cloud, this design can be implemented by setting up peering connections between any two VPCs. These VPCs can also be set up to communicate with each other internally through the cloud service provider's network without having to route the traffic via the internet.

    While this topology offers high redundancy, the number of connections grows tremendously as more networks are added, making it harder to scale a network using a mesh topology.

    Mesh Network on AWS

    This is an image of a Mesh Network on AWS

    Source: AWS, 2018

    Constraints

    The disadvantages of peering VPCs into a mesh quickly arise with:

    • Transitive connections: Transitive connections are not supported in the cloud, unlike with on-prem networking. This means that if there are two networks that need to communicate, a single peering link can be set up between them. However, if there are more than two networks and they all need to communicate, they should all be connected to each other with separate individual connections.
    • Cost of operation: The lack of transitive routing requires many connections to be set up, which adds up to a more expensive topology to operate as the number of networks grows. Cloud providers also usually limit the number of peering networks that can be set up, and this limit can be hit with as few as 100 networks.
    • Management: Mesh tends to be very complicated to set up, owing to the large number of different peering links that need to be established. While this may be manageable for small organizations with small operations, for larger organizations with robust cybersecurity practices that require multiple VPCs to be deployed and interconnected for communications, mesh opens you up to multiple points of failure.
    • Redundancy: With multiple points of failure already being a major drawback of this design, you also cannot have more than one peered connection between any two networks at the same time. This makes designing your networking systems for redundancy that much more challenging.
    Number of virtual networks 10 20 50 100
    Peering links required
    [(n-1)*n]/2
    45 190 1225 4950

    Proportional relationship of virtual networks to required peering links in a mesh topology

    Case study

    INDUSTRY: Blockchain
    SOURCE: Microsoft

    An organization with four members wants to deploy a blockchain in the cloud, with each member running their own virtual network. With only four members on the team, a mesh network can be created in the cloud with each of their networks being connected to each other, adding up to a total of 12 peering connections (four members with three connections each). While the members may all be using different cloud accounts, setting up connections between them will still be possible.

    The organization wants to expand to 15 members within the next year, with each new member being connected with their separate virtual networks. Once grown, the organization will have a total of 210 peering connections since each of the virtual networks will then need 14 peering connections. While this may still be possible to deploy, the number of connections makes it harder to manage and would be that much more difficult to deploy if the organization grows to even 30 or 40 members. The new scale of virtual connections calls for an alternative networking strategy that cloud providers offer – the hub and spoke topology.

    This is an image of the connections involved in a mesh network with four participants.

    Source: Microsoft, 2017

    Hub and spoke network topology

    In hub and spoke network design, each network is connected to a central network that facilitates intercommunication between the networks. The central network, also called the hub, can be used by multiple workloads/servers/services for hosting services and for managing external connectivity. Other networks connected to the hub through network peering are called spokes and host workloads.

    Communications between the workloads/servers/services on spokes pass in or out of the hub where they are inspected and routed. The spokes can also be centrally managed from the hub with IT rules and processes.

    A hub and spoke design enable a larger number of virtual networks to be interconnected as each network only needs one peered connection (to the hub) to be able to communicate with any other network in the system.

    Hub and Spoke Network on AWS

    This is an image of the Hub and Spoke Network on AWS

    What hub and spoke networks do better

    1. Ease of connectivity: Hub and spoke decreases the liabilities of scale that come from a growing business by providing a consistent connection that can be scaled easily. As more networks are added to an organization, each will only need to be connected once – to the hub. The number of connections is considerably lower than in a mesh topology and makes it easier to maintain and manage.
    2. Business agility and scalability: It is easier to increase the number of networks than in mesh, making it easier to grow your business into new channels with less time, investment, and risk.
    3. Data collection: With a hub and spoke design, all data flows through the hub – depending on the design, this includes all ingress and egress to and from the system. This makes it an excellent central network to collect all business data.
    4. Network-level isolation: Hub and spoke enables separation of workloads and tiers into different networks. This is particularly useful to ensure an issue affecting a network or a workload does not affect the rest.
    5. Network changes: Changes to a separated network are much easier to carry out knowing the changes made will not affect all the other connected networks. This reduces work-hours significantly when systems or applications need to be altered.
    6. Compliance: Compliance requirements such as SOC 1 and SOC 2 require separate environments for production, development, and testing, which can be done in a hub and spoke model without having to re-create security controls for all networks.

    Hub and spoke constraints

    While there are plenty of benefits to using this topology, there are still a few notable disadvantages with the design.

    Point-to-point peering

    The total number of total peered connections required might be lower than mesh, but the cost of running independent projects is cheaper on mesh as point-to-point data transfers are cheaper.

    Global access speeds with a monolithic design

    With global organizations, implementing a single monolithic hub network for network ingress and egress will slow down access to cloud services that users will require. A distributed network will ramp up the speeds for its users to access these services.

    Costs for a resilient design

    Connectivity between the spokes can fail if the hub site dies or faces major disruptions. While there are redundancy plans for cloud networks, it will be an additional cost to plan and build an environment for it.

    Leverage the hub and spoke strategy for:

    Providing access to shared services: Hub and spoke can be used to give workloads that are deployed on different networks access to shared services by placing the shared service in the hub. For example, DNS servers can be placed in the hub network, and production or host networks can be connected to the hub to access it, or if the central network is set up to host Active Directory services, then servers in other networks can act as spokes and have full access to the central VPC to send requests. This is also a great way to separate workloads that do not need to communicate with each other but all need access to the same services.

    Adding new locations: An expanding organization that needs to add additional global or domestic locations can leverage hub and spoke to connect new network locations to the main system without the need for multiple connections.

    Cost savings: Apart from having fewer connections than mesh that can save costs in the cloud, hub and spoke can also be used to centralize services such as DNS and NAT to be managed in one location rather than having to individually deploy in each network. This can bring down management efforts and costs considerably.

    Centralized security: Enterprises can deploy a center of excellence on the hub for security, and the spokes connected to it can leverage a higher level of security and increase resilience. It will also be easier to control and manage network policies and networking resources from the hub.

    Network management: Since each spoke is peered only once to the hub, detecting connectivity problems or other network issues is made simpler in hub and spoke than on mesh. A network manager deployed on the cloud can give access to network problems faster than on other topologies.

    Hub and spoke – mesh hybrid

    The advantages of using a hub and spoke model far exceed those of using a mesh topology in the cloud and go to show why most organizations ultimately end up using the hub and spoke as their networking strategy.

    However, organizations, especially large ones, are complex entities, and choosing only one model may not serve all business needs. In such cases, a hybrid approach may be the best strategy. The following slides will demonstrate the advantages and use cases for mesh, however limited they might be.

    Where it can be useful:

    An organization can have multiple network topologies where system X is a mesh and system Y is a hub and spoke. A shared system Z can be a part of both systems depending on the needs.

    An organization can have multiple networks interconnected in a mesh and some of the networks in the mesh can be a hub for a hub-spoke network. For example, a business unit that works on data analysis can deploy their services in a spoke that is connected to a central hub that can host shared services such as Active Directory or NAT. The central hub can then be connected to a regional on-prem network where data and other shared services can be hosted.

    Hub and spoke – mesh hybrid network on AWS

    This is an image of the Hub and spoke – mesh hybrid network on AWS

    Why mesh can still be useful

    Benefits Of Mesh

    Use Cases For Mesh

    Security: Setting up a peering connection between two VPCs comes with the benefit of improving security since the connection can be private between the networks and can isolate public traffic from the internet. The traffic between the networks never has to leave the cloud provider's network, which helps reduce a class of risks.

    Reduced network costs: Since the peered networks communicate internally through the cloud's internal networks, the data transfer costs are typically cheaper than over the public internet.

    Communication speed: Improved network latency is a key benefit from using mesh because the peered traffic does not have to go over the public internet but rather the internal network. The network traffic between the connections can also be quickly redirected as needed.

    Higher flexibility for backend services: Mesh networks can be desirable for back-end services if egress traffic needs to be blocked to the public internet from the deployed services/servers. This also helps avoid having to set up public IP or network address translation (NAT) configurations.

    Connecting two or more networks for full access to resources: For example, consider an organization that has separate networks for each department, which don't all need to communicate with each other. Here, a peering network can be set up only between the networks that need to communicate with full or partial access to each other such as finance to HR or accounting to IT.

    Specific security or compliance need: Mesh or VPC peering can also come in handy to serve specific security needs or logging needs that require using a network to connect to other networks directly and in private. For example, global organizations that face regulatory requirements of storing or transferring data domestically with private connections.

    Systems with very few networks that do not need internet access: Workloads deployed in networks that need to communicate with each other but do not require internet access or network address translation (NAT) can be connected using mesh especially when there are security reasons to keep them from being connected to the main system, e.g. backend services such as testing environments, labs, or sandboxes can leverage this design.

    Designing for governance vs. flexibility in hub and spoke

    Governance and flexibility in managing resources in the cloud are inversely proportional: The higher the governance, the less freedom you have to innovate.

    The complexities of designing an organization's networks grow with the organization as it becomes global and takes on more services and lines of business. Organizations that choose to deploy the hub and spoke model face a dilemma in choosing between governance and flexibility for their networks. Organizations need to find that sweet spot to find the right balance between how much they want to govern their systems, mainly for security- and cost-monitoring, and how much flexibility they want to provide for innovation and other operations, since the two usually tend to have an inverse relationship.

    This decision in hub and spoke usually means that the domains chosen for higher governance must be placed in the hub network, and the domains that need more flexibility in a spoke. The key variables in the following slide will help determine the placement of the domain and will depend entirely on the organization's context.

    The two networking patterns in the cloud have layered complexities that need to be systematically addressed.

    Designing for governance vs. flexibility in hub and spoke

    If a network has more flexibility in all or most of these domains, it may be a good candidate for a spoke-heavy design; otherwise, it may be better designed in a hub-centric pattern.

    • Function: The function the domain network is assigned to and the autonomy the function needs to be successful. For example, software R&D usually requires high flexibility to be successful.
    • Regulations: The extent of independence from both internal and external regulatory constraints the domain has. For example, a treasury reporting domain typically has high internal and external regulations to adhere to.
    • Human resources: The freedom a domain has to hire and manage its resources to perform its function. For example, production facilities in a huge organization have the freedom to manage their own resources.
    • Operations: The freedom a domain has to control its operations and manage its own spending to perform its functions. For example, governments usually have different departments and agencies, each with its own budget to perform its functions.
    • Technology: The independence and the ability a domain has to manage its selection and implementation of technology resources in the cloud. For example, you may not want a software testing team to have complete autonomy to deploy resources.

    Optimal placement of services between the hub and spoke

    Shared services and vendor management

    Resources that are shared between multiple projects or departments or even by the entire organization should be hosted on the hub network to simplify sharing these services. For example, e-learning applications that may be used by multiple business units to train their teams, Active Directory accessed by most teams, or even SAAS platforms such as O365 and Salesforce can leverage buying power and drive down the costs for the organization. Shared services should also be standardized across the organization and for that, it needs to have high governance.

    Services that are an individual need for a network and have no preexisting relationship with other networks or buying power and scale can be hosted in a spoke network. For example, specialized accounting software used exclusively by the accounting team or design software used by a single team. Although the services are still a part of the wider network, it helps separate duties from the shared services network and provides flexibility to the teams to customize and manage their services to suit their individual needs.

    Network egress and interaction

    Network connections, be they in the cloud or hybrid-cloud, are used by everyone to either connect to the internet, access cloud services, or access the organization's data center. Since this is a shared service, a centralized networking account must be placed in the hub for greater governance. Interactions between the spokes in a hub and spoke model happens through the hub, and providing internet access to the spokes through the hub can help leverage cost benefits in the cloud. The network account will perform routing duties between the spokes, on-prem assets, and egress out to the internet.

    For example, NAT gateways in the cloud that are managed services are usually charged by the hour, and deploying NAT on each spoke can be harder to manage and expensive to maintain. A NAT gateway deployed in a central networking hub can be accessed by all spokes, so centralizing it is a great option.

    Note that, in some cases, when using edge locations for data transfers, it may be cost effective to deploy a NAT in the spoke, but such cases usually do not apply to most organizational units.

    A centralized network hub can also be useful to configure network policies and network resources while organizational departments can configure non-network resources, which helps separate responsibilities for all the spokes in the system. For example, subnets and routes can be controlled from the central network hub to ensure standardized network policies across the network.

    Security

    While there needs to be security in the hub and the spokes individually, finding the balance of operation can make the systems more robust. Hub and spoke design can be an effective tool for security when a principal security hub is hosted in the hub network. The central security hub can collect data from the spokes as well as non-spoke sources such as regulatory bodies and threat intelligence providers, and then share the information with the spokes.

    Threat information sharing is a major benefit of using this design, and the hub can take actions to analyze and enrich the data before sharing it with spokes. Shared services such as threat intelligence platforms (TIP) can also benefit from being centralized when stationed in the hub. A collective defense approach between the hub and spoke can be very successful in addressing sophisticated threats.

    Compliance and regulatory requirements such as HIPAA can also be placed in the hub, and the spokes connected to it can make use of it instead of having to deploy it in each spoke individually.

    Cloud metering

    The governance vs. flexibility paradigm usually decides the placement of cloud metering, i.e. if the organization wants higher control over cloud costs, it should be in the central hub, whereas if it prioritizes innovation, the spokes should be allowed to control it. Regardless of the placement of the domain, the costs can be monitored from the central hub using cloud-native monitoring tools such as Azure Monitor or any third-party software deployed in the hub.

    For ease of governance and since resources are usually shared at a project level, most cloud service providers suggest that an individual metering service be placed in the spokes. The centralized billing system of the organization, however, can make use of scale and reserved instances to drive down the costs that the spokes can take advantage of. For example, billing and access control resources are placed in the lower levels in GCP to enable users to set up projects and perform their tasks. These billing systems in the lower levels are then controlled by a centralized billing system to decide who pays for the resources provisioned.

    Don't get stuck with your on-prem network design. Design for the cloud.

    1. Peering VPCs into a mesh design can be an easy way to get onto the cloud, but it should not be your networking strategy for the long run.
    2. Hub and spoke network design offers more benefits than any other network strategy to be adopted only when the need arises. Plan for the design early on and keep a strategy in place to deploy it as early as possible.
    3. Hybrid of mesh and hub and spoke will be very useful in connecting multiple large networks especially when they need to access the same resources without having to route the traffic over the internet.
    4. Governance vs. flexibility should be a key consideration when designing for hub and spoke to leverage the best out of your infrastructure.
    5. Distribute domains across the hub or spokes to leverage costs, security, data collection, and economies of scale, and to foster secure interactions between networks.

    Cloud network design strategy

    This is an image of the framework for developing a Cloud Network Design Strategy.

    Bibliography

    Borschel, Brett. "Azure Hub Spoke Virtual Network Design Best Practices." Acendri Solutions, 13 Jan. 2022. Web.
    Singh, Garvit. "Amazon Virtual Private Cloud Connectivity Options." AWS, January 2018. Web.
    "What Is the Hub and Spoke Information Sharing Model?" Cyware, 16 Aug. 2021. Web.
    Youseff, Lamia. "Mesh and Hub-and-Spoke Networks on Azure." Microsoft, Dec. 2017. Web.

    Applications Priorities 2023

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}186|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Architecture & Strategy
    • Parent Category Link: /architecture-and-strategy
    • Economic, social, and regulatory conditions have changed livelihoods, businesses, and marketplaces. Modern tools and technologies have acted as lifelines by minimizing operating and delivery costs, and in the process, establishing a strong foundation for growth and maturity.
    • These tools and technologies must meet the top business goals of CXOs: ensure service continuity, improve customer experience, and make data-driven decisions.
    • While today’s business applications are good and well received, there is still room for improvement. The average business application satisfaction score among IT leadership was 72% (n=1582, CIO Business Vision).

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Applications are critical components in any business strategic plan. They can directly influence an organization’s internal and external brand and reputation, such as their uniqueness, competitiveness and innovativeness in the industry
    • Business leaders are continuously looking for innovative ways to better position their application portfolio to satisfy their goals and objectives, i.e., application priorities. Given the scope and costs often involved, these priorities must be carefully crafted to clearly state achievable business outcomes that satisfies the different needs very different customers, stakeholders, and users.
    • Unfortunately, expectations on your applications team have increased while the gap between how stakeholders and applications teams perceive effectiveness remains wide. This points to a need to clarify the requirements to deliver valuable and quality applications and address the pressures challenging your teams.

    Impact and Result

    Learn and explore the technology and practice initiatives in this report to determine which initiatives should be prioritized in your application strategy and align to your business organizational objectives:

    • Optimize the effectiveness of the IT organization.
    • Boost the productivity of the enterprise.
    • Enable business growth through technology.

    Applications Priorities 2023 Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Applications Priorities Report 2023 – A report that introduces and describes five opportunities to prioritize in your 2023 application strategy.

    In this report, we explore five priorities for emerging and leading-edge technologies and practices that can improve on capabilities needed to meet the ambitions of your organization.

    • Applications Priorities 2023 Report

    Infographic

    Further reading

    Applications Priorities 2023

    Applications are the engine of the business: keep them relevant and modern

    What we are facing today is transforming the ways in which we work, live, and relate to one another. Applications teams and portfolios MUST change to meet this reality.

    Economic, social, and regulatory conditions have changed livelihoods, businesses, and marketplaces. Modern tools and technologies have acted as lifelines by minimizing operating and delivery costs, and in the process, establishing a strong foundation for growth and maturity.

    As organizations continue to strengthen business continuity, disaster recovery, and system resilience, activities to simply "keep the lights on" are not enough. Be pragmatic in the prioritization and planning of your applications initiatives, and use your technologies as a foundation for your growth.

    Your applications must meet the top business goals of your CXOs

    • Ensure service continuity
    • Improve customer experience
    • Make data-driven decisions
    • Maximize stakeholder value
    • Manage risk

    Source: CEO-CIO Alignment Diagnostics, August 2021 to July 2022, n=568.

    Select and align your applications priorities to your business goals and objectives

    Applications are critical components in any business strategic plan. They can directly influence an organization's internal and external brand and reputation, such as their:

    • Uniqueness, competitiveness, and innovativeness in the industry.
    • Ability to be dynamic, flexible, and responsive to changing expectations, business conditions, and technologies.

    Therefore, business leaders are continuously looking for innovative ways to better position their application portfolios to satisfy their goals and objectives, i.e. applications priorities. Given the scope and costs often involved, these priorities must be carefully crafted to clearly state achievable business outcomes that satisfy
    the different needs of very different customers, stakeholders, and users.

    Today's business applications are good but leave room for improvement

    72%
    Average business application satisfaction score among IT leadership in 1582 organizations.

    Source: CIO Business Vision, August 2021 to July 2022, N=190.

    Five Applications Priorities for 2023

    In this report, we explore five priorities for emerging and leading-edge technologies and practices that can improve on capabilities needed to meet the Ambitions of your organization.

    this is an image of the Five Applications Priorities for which will be addressed in this blueprint.

    Strengthen your foundations to better support your applications priorities

    These key capabilities are imperative to the success of your applications strategy.

    KPI and Metrics

    Easily attainable and insightful measurements to gauge the progress of meeting strategic objectives and goals (KPIs), and the performance of individual teams, practices and processes (metrics).

    BUSINESS ALIGNMENT

    Gain an accurate understanding and interpretation of stakeholder, end-user, and customer expectations and priorities. These define the success of business products and services considering the priorities of individual business units and teams.

    EFFICIENT DELIVERY & SUPPORT PRACTICE

    Software delivery and support roles, processes, and tools are collaborative, well equipped and resourced, and optimized to meet changing stakeholder expectations.

    Data Management & Governance

    Ensuring data is continuously reliable and trustworthy. Data structure and integrations are defined, governed, and monitored.

    Product & Service Ownership

    Complete inventory and rationalization of the product and service portfolio, prioritized backlogs, roadmaps, and clear product and service ownership with good governance. This helps ensure this portfolio is optimized to meet its goals and objectives.

    Strengthen your foundations to better support your applications priorities (cont'd)

    These key capabilities are imperative to the success of your applications strategy.

    Organizational Change Management

    Manage the adoption of new and modified processes and technologies considering reputational, human, and operational concerns.

    IT Operational Management

    Continuous monitoring and upkeep of products and services to assure business continuity, and system reliability, robustness and disaster recovery.

    Architectural Framework

    A set of principles and standards that guides the consistent, sustainable and scalable growth of enterprise technologies. Changes to the architecture are made in collaboration with affected parties, such as security and infrastructure.

    Application Security

    The measures, controls, and tactics at the application layer that prevent vulnerabilities against external and internal threats and ensure compliance to industry and regulatory security frameworks and standards.

    There are many factors that can stand in your team's way

    Expectations on your applications team have increased, while the gap between how stakeholders and applications teams perceive effectiveness remains wide. This points to a need to clarify the requirements to deliver valuable and quality applications and address the pressures challenging your teams.

    1. Attracting and retaining talent
    2. Maximizing the return on technology
    3. Confidently shifting to digital
    4. Addressing competing priorities
    5. Fostering a collaborative culture
    6. Creating high-throughput teams

    CIOs agree that at least some improvement is needed across key IT activities

    A bar graph is depicted which shows the proportion of CIOs who believe that some, or significant improvement is necessary for the following categories: Measure IT Project Success; Align IT Budget; Align IT Project Approval Process; Measure Stakeholder Satisfaction With IT; Define and Align IT Strategy; Understand Business Goals

    Source: CEO-CIO Alignment Diagnostics, August 2021 to July 2022, n=568.

    Pressure Point 1:
    Attracting and Retaining Talent

    Recent environmental pressures impacted traditional working arrangements and showed more workplace flexibility is often possible. At the same time, many employees' expectations about how, when, and where they choose to work have also evolved. Recruitment and retention are reflections of different sides of the same employee value proposition coin. Organizations that fail to reinvent their approach to attracting and retaining talent by focusing on candidate and employee experience risk turnover, vacancies, and lost opportunities that can negatively impact the bottom line.

    Address the underlying challenges

    • Lack of employee empowerment and few opportunities for learning and development.
    • Poor coworker and manager relationships.
    • Compensation and benefits are inadequate to maintain desired quality of life.
    • Unproductive work environment and conflicting balance of work and life.
    • Unsatisfactory employee experience, including lack of employee recognition
      and transparency of organizational change.

    While workplace flexibility comes with many benefits, longer work hours jeopardize wellbeing.
    62% of organizations reported increased working hours, while 80% reported an increase in flexibility.
    Source: McLean & Company, 2022; n=394.

    Be strategic in how you fill and train key IT skills and capabilities

    • Cybersecurity
    • Big Data/Analytics
    • Technical Architecture
    • DevOps
    • Development
    • Cloud

    Source: Harvey Nash Group, 2021; n=2120.

    Pressure Point 2:
    Maximizing the Return of Technology

    Recent environmental pressures impacted traditional working arrangements and showed more workplace flexibility is often possible. At the same time, many employees' expectations about how, when, and where they choose to work have also evolved. Recruitment and retention are reflections of different sides of the same employee value proposition coin. Organizations that fail to reinvent their approach to attracting and retaining talent by focusing on candidate and employee experience risk turnover, vacancies, and lost opportunities that can negatively impact the bottom line.

    Address the underlying challenges

    • Inability to analyze, propose, justify, and communicate modernization solutions in language the stakeholders understand and in a way that shows they clearly support business priorities and KPIs and mitigate risks.
    • Little interest in documenting and rationalizing products and services through business-IT collaboration.
    • Lack of internal knowledge of the system and loss of vendor support.
    • Undefined, siloed product and service ownership and governance, preventing solutions from working together to collectively deliver more value.
    • Little stakeholder appetite to invest in activities beyond "keeping the lights on."

    Only 64% of applications were identified as effective by end users.
    Effective applications are identified as at least highly important and have high feature and usability satisfaction.
    Source: Application Portfolio Assessment, August 2021 to July 2022; N=315.

    "Regardless of the many definitions of modernization floating around, the one characteristic that we should be striving for is to ensure our applications do an outstanding job of supporting the users and the business in the most effective and efficient manner possible."
    Source: looksoftware.

    Pressure Point 3:
    Confidently Shifting to Digital

    "Going digital" reshapes how the business operates and drives value by optimizing how digital and traditional technologies and tactics work together. This shift often presents significant business and technical risks to business processes, enterprise data, applications, and systems which stakeholders and teams are not aware of or prepared to accommodate.

    Address the underlying challenges

    • Differing perspectives on digital can lead to disjointed transformation initiatives, oversold benefits, and a lack of synergy among digital technologies and processes.
    • Organizations have difficulty adapting to new technologies or rethinking current business models, processes, and ways of working because of the potential human, ethical, and reputational impacts and restrictions from legacy systems.
    • Management lacks a framework to evaluate how their organization manages and governs business value delivery.
    • IT is not equipped or resourced to address these rapidly changing business, customer, and technology needs.
    • The wrong tools and technologies were chosen to support the shift to digital.

    The shift to digital processes is starting, but slowly.
    62% of respondents indicated that 1-20% of their processes were digitized during the past year.
    Source: Tech Trends and Priorities 2023; N=500

    Resistance to change and time/budget constraints are top barriers preventing companies from modernizing their applications.
    Source: Konveyor, 2022; n=600.

    Pressure Point 4:
    Addressing Competing Priorities

    Enterprise products and services are not used, operated, or branded in isolation. The various parties involved may have competing priorities, which often leads to disagreements on when certain business and technology changes should be made and how resources, budget, and other assets should be allocated. Without a broader product vision, portfolio vision, and roadmap, the various dependent or related products and services will not deliver the same level of value as if they were managed collectively.

    Address the underlying challenges

    • Undefined product and service ownership and governance, including escalation procedures when consensus cannot be reached.
    • Lack of a unified and grounded set of value and quality definitions, guiding principles, prioritization standards, and broad visibility across portfolios, business capabilities, and business functions.
    • Distrust between business units and IT teams, which leads to the scaling of unmanaged applications and fragmented changes and projects.
    • Decisions are based on opinions and experiences without supporting data.

    55% of CXOs stated some improvement is necessary in activities to understand business goals.
    Source: CEO-CIO Alignment Diagnostics, August 2021 to July 2022; n=568.

    CXOs are moderately satisfied with IT's performance as a business partner (average score of 69% among all CXOs). This sentiment is similarly felt among CIOs (64%).
    Source: CEO-CIO Alignment Diagnostics, August 2021 to July 2022; n=568.

    Pressure Point 5:
    Fostering a Collaborative Culture

    Culture impacts business results, including bottom-line revenue and productivity metrics. Leaders appreciate the impact culture can have on applications initiatives and wish to leverage this. How culture translates from an abstract concept to something that is measurable and actionable is not straightforward. Executives need to clarify how the desired culture will help achieve their applications strategy and need to focus on the items that will have the most impact.

    Address the underlying challenges

    • Broad changes do not consider the unique subcultures, personalities, and behaviors of the various teams and individuals in the organization.
    • Leaders mandate cultural changes without alleviating critical barriers and do not embody the principles of the target state.
    • Bureaucracy and politics restrict changes and encourage the status quo.
    • Industry standards, technologies, and frameworks do not support or cannot be tailored to fit the desired culture.
    • Some teams are deliberately excluded from the scoping, planning, and execution of key product and service delivery and management activities.

    Agile does not solve team culture challenges.
    43% of organizations cited organizational culture as a significant barrier to adopting and scaling Agile practices.
    Source: Digital.ai, 2021.

    "Providing a great employee experience" as the second priority (after recruiting) highlights the emphasis organizations are placing on helping employees adjust after having been forced to change the way work gets done.
    Source: McLean & Company, 2022; N=826.

    Use your applications priorities to help address your pressure points

    Success can be dependent on your ability to navigate around or alleviate your pressure points. Design and market your applications priorities to bring attention to your pressure points and position them as key risk factors to their success.

    Applications Priorities
    Digital Experience (DX) Intelligent Automation Proactive Application Management Multisource Systems Digital Organization as a Platform
    Attracting and Retaining Talent Enhance the employee experience Be transparent and support role changes Shift focus from maintenance to innovation Enable business-managed applications Promote and showcase achievements and successes
    Maximizing the Return on Technology Modernize or extend the use of existing investments Automate applications across multiple business functions Improve the reliability of mission-critical applications Enhance the functionality of existing applications Increase visibility of underused applications
    Confidently Shifting to Digital Prioritize DX in your shift to digital Select the capabilities that will benefit most from automation Prepare applications to support digital tools and technologies Use best-of-breed tools to meet specific digital needs Bring all applications up to a common digital standard
    Addressing Competing Priorities Ground your digital vision, goals, and objectives Recognize and evaluate the architectural impact Rationalize the health of the applications Agree on a common philosophy on system composition Map to a holistic platform vision, goals, and objectives
    Fostering a Collaborative Culture Involve all perspectives in defining and delivering DX Involve the end user in the delivery and testing of the automated process Include the technical perspective in the viability of future applications plans Discuss how applications can work together better in an ecosystem Ensure the platform is configured to meet the individual needs of the users
    Creating High-Throughput Teams Establish delivery principles centered on DX Remove manual, error-prone, and mundane tasks Simplify applications to ease delivery and maintenance Alleviate delivery bottlenecks and issues Abstract the enterprise system to expedite delivery

    Digital Experience (DX)

    PRIORITY 1

    • Deliver Valuable User, Customer, Employee, and Brand Experiences

    Delivering valuable digital experiences requires the adoption of good management, governance, and operational practices to accommodate stakeholder, employee, customer, and end-user expectations of digital experiences (e.g. product management, automation, and iterative delivery). Technologies are chosen based on what best enables, delivers, and supports these expectations.

    Introduction

    Digital transformation is not just about new tools and technologies. It is also about delivering a valuable digital experience

    What is digital experience (DX)?

    Digital experience (DX) refers to the interaction between a user and an organization through digital products and services. Digital products and services are tools, systems, devices, and resources that gather, store, and process data; are continuously modernized; and embody eight key attributes that are described on the following slide. DX is broken down into four distinct perspectives*:

    • Customer Experience – The immediate perceptions of transactions and interactions experienced through a customer's journey in the use of the organization's digital
      products and services.
    • End-User Experience – Users' emotions, beliefs, and physical and psychological responses
      that occur before, during, or after interacting with a digital product or service.
    • Brand Experience – The broader perceptions, emotions, thoughts, feelings and actions the public associate with the organization's brand and reputation or its products and services. Brand experience evolves over time as customers continuously engage with the brand.
    • Employee Experience – The satisfaction and experience of an employee through their journey with the organization, from recruitment and hiring to their departure. How an employee embodies and promotes the organization brand and culture can affect their performance, trust, respect, and drive to innovate and optimize.
    Digital Products and Services
    Customer Experience Brand Experience Employee Experience End-User Experience

    Digital products and services have a common set of attributes

    Digital transformation is not just about new tools and technologies. It is also about delivering a valuable digital experience

    • Digital products and services must keep pace with changing business and end-user needs as well as tightly supporting your maturing business model with continuous modernization. Focus your continuous modernization on the key characteristics that drive business value.
    • Fit for purpose: Functionalities are designed and implemented for the purpose of satisfying the end user's needs and solving their problems.
    • User-centric: End users see the product as rewarding, engaging, intuitive, and emotionally satisfying. They want to come back to it.
    • Adaptable: The product can be quickly tailored to meet changing end-user and technology needs with reusable and customizable components.
    • Accessible: The product is available on demand and on the end user's preferred interface.
      End users have a seamless experience across all devices.
    • Private and secured: The end user's activity and data are protected from unauthorized access.
    • Informative and insightful: The product delivers consumable, accurate, and trustworthy real-time data that is important to the end user.
    • Seamless application connection: The product facilitates direct interactions with one or more other products through an uninterrupted user experience.
    • Relationship and network building: The product enables and promotes the connection and interaction of people.

    The Business Value cycle of continuous modernization.

    Signals

    DX is critical for business growth and maturity, but the organization may not be ready

    A good DX has become a key differentiator that gives organizations an advantage over their competition and peers. Shifts in working environments; employee, customer, and stakeholder expectations; and the advancements in modern technologies have raised the importance of adopting and transitioning to digital processes and tools to stay relevant and responsive to changing business and technology conditions.

    Applications teams are critical to ensuring the successful delivery and operation of these digital processes and tools. However, they are often under-resourced and challenged to meet their DX goals.

    • 7% of both business and IT respondents think IT has the resources needed to keep up with digital transformation initiatives and meet deadlines (Cyara, 2021).
    • 43% of respondents said that the core barrier to digital transformation is a lack of skilled resources (Creatio, 2021).
    A circle graph is shown with 91% of the circle coloured in dark blue, with the number 91% in the centre.

    of organizations stated that at least 1% of processes were shifted from being manually completed to digitally completed in the last year. 29% of organizations stated at least 21% were shifted.

    Source: Tech Trends and Priorities 2023; N=500.

    A circle graph is shown with 98% of the circle coloured in dark blue, with the number 98% in the centre.

    of organizations recognized digital transformation is important for competitive advantage. 94% stated it is important to enhance customer experience, and 91% stated it will have a positive impact on revenue.

    Source: Cyara, 2021.

    Drivers

    Brand and reputation

    Customers are swayed by the innovations and advancements in digital technologies and expect your applications team to deliver and support them. Your leaders recognize the importance of these expectations and are integrating them into their business strategy and brand (how the organization presents itself to its customers, employees and the public). They hope that their actions will improve and shape the company's reputation (public perception of the company) as effective, customer-focused, and forward-thinking.

    Worker productivity

    As you evolve and adopt more complex tools and technology, your stakeholders will expect more from business units and IT teams. Unfortunately, teams employing manual processes and legacy systems will struggle to meet these expectations. Digital products and services promote the simplification of complex operations and applications and help the business and your teams better align operational practices with strategic goals and deliver valuable DX.

    Organization modernization

    Legacy processes, systems, and ways of working are no longer suitable for meeting the strategic digital objectives and DX needs stakeholders expect. They drive up operational costs without increased benefits, impede business growth and innovation, and consume scarce budgets that could be used for other priorities. Shifting to digital tools and technologies will bring these challenges to light and demonstrate how modernization is an integral part of DX success.

    Benefits & Risks

    Benefits

    • Flexibility & Satisfaction
    • Adoption
    • Reliability

    Employees and customers can choose how they want to access, modify, and consume digital products and services. They can be tailored to meet the specific functional needs, behaviors, and habits of the end user.

    The customer, end user, brand, and employee drive selection, design, and delivery of digital products and services. Even the most advanced technologies will fail if key roles do not see the value in their use.

    Digital products and services are delivered with technical quality built into them, ensuring they meet the industry, regulatory, and company standards throughout their lifespan and in various conditions.

    Risks

    • Legacy & Lore
    • Bureaucracy & Politics
    • Process Inefficiencies
    • No Quality Standards

    Some stakeholders may not be willing to change due to their familiarity and comfort of business practices.

    Competing and conflicting priorities of strategic products and services undermine digital transformation and broader modernization efforts.

    Business processes are often burdened by wasteful activities. Digital products and services are only as valuable as the processes they support.

    The performance and support of your digital products and services are hampered due to unmanageable technical debt because of a deliberate decision to bypass or omit quality good practices.

    Address your pressure points to fully realize the benefits of this priority

    Success can be dependent on your ability to address your pressure points.

    Attracting and Retaining Talent

    Enhance the employee experience.

    Design the digital processes, tools, and technologies to meet the individual needs of the employee.

    Maximizing the Return on Technology

    Modernize or extend the use of existing investments.

    Drive higher adoption of applications and higher user value and productivity by implementing digital capabilities to the applications that will gain the most.

    Confidently Shifting to Digital

    Prioritize DX in your shift to digital. Include DX as part of your definition of success.

    Your products and services are not valuable if users, customers, and employees do not use them.

    Addressing Competing Priorities

    Ground your digital vision, goals, and objectives

    Establish clear ownership of DX and digital products and services with a cross-functional prioritization framework.

    Fostering a Collaborative Culture

    Involve all perspectives in defining and delivering DX.

    Maintain a committee of owners, stakeholders, and delivery teams to ensure consensus and discuss how to address cross-functional opportunities and risks.

    Creating High-Throughput Teams

    Establish delivery principles centered on DX.

    Enforce guiding principles to streamline and simplify DX delivery, such as plug-and-play architecture and quality standards.

    Recommendations

    Build a digital business strategy

    A digital business strategy clearly articulates the goals and ambitions of the business to adopt digital practices, tools, and technologies. This document:

    • Looks for ways to transform the business by identifying what technologies to embrace, what processes to automate, and what new business models to create.
    • Unifies digital possibilities with your customer experiences.
    • Establishes accountability with the executive leadership.
    • States the importance of cross-functional participation from senior management across the organization.

    Related Research:

    Learn, understand, and empathize with your users, employees, and customers

    • To create a better product, solution, or service, understanding those who use it, their needs, and their context is critical.
    • A great experience design practice can help you balance those goals so that they are in harmony with those of your users.
    • IT leaders must find ways to understand the needs of the business and develop empathy on a much deeper level. This empathy is the foundation for a thriving business partnership.

    Related Research:

    Recommendations

    Center product and service delivery decisions and activities on DX and quality

    User, customer, employee, and brand are integral perspectives on the software development lifecycle (SDLC) and the management and governance practices supporting digital products and services. It ensures quality standards and controls are consistently upheld while maintaining alignment with various needs and priorities. The goal is to come to a consensus on a universal definition and approach to embed quality and DX-thinking throughout the delivery process.

    Related Research:

    Instill collaborative delivery practices

    Today's rapidly scaling and increasingly complex digital products and services create mounting pressure on delivery teams to release new features and changes quickly and with sufficient quality. This pressure is further compounded by the competing priorities of individual stakeholders and the nuances among different personas of digital products and services.

    A collaborative delivery practice sets the activities, channels, and relationships needed to deliver a valuable and quality product or service with cross-functional awareness, accountability, and agreement.

    Related Research:

    Recommendations

    Continuously monitor and modernize your digital products and services

    Today's modern digital products and services are tomorrow's shelfware. They gradually lose their value, and the supporting technologies will become obsolete. Modernization is a continuous need.

    Data-driven insights help decision makers decide which products and services to retire, upgrade, retrain on, or maintain to meet the demands of the business.

    Enhancements focusing on critical business capabilities strengthen the case for investment and build trust with all stakeholders.

    Related Research:

    CASE STUDY
    Mastercard in Asia

    Focus on the customer journey

    Chief Marketing Officer M.V. Rajamannar (Raja) wanted to change Mastercard's iconic "Priceless" ad campaign (with the slogan "There are some things money can't buy. For everything else there's Mastercard."). The main reasons were that the campaign relied on one-way communication and targeted end customers, even though Mastercard doesn't issue cards directly to customers; partner banks do. To drive the change in campaign, Raja and his team created a digital engine that leveraged digital and social media. Digital engine is a seven-step process based on insights gleaned from data and real-time optimization.

    1. Emotional spark: Using data to understand customers' passion points, Mastercard builds videos and creatives to ignite an emotional spark and give customers a reason to engage. For example, weeks before New Year's Eve, Mastercard produced a video with Hugh Jackman to encourage customers to submit a story about someone who deeply mattered to them. The authors of the winning story would be flown to reunite with those both distant and dear.
    2. Engagement: Mastercard targets the right audience with a spark video through social media to encourage customers to share their stories.
    3. Offers: To help its partner banks and merchants in driving their business, the company identifies the best offers to match consumers' interests. In the above campaign, Mastercard's Asia-Pacific team found that Singapore was a favorite destination for Indian customers, so they partnered with Singapore's Resorts World Sentosa with an attractive offer.
    4. Real-time optimization: Mastercard optimizes, in real time, a portfolio of several offers through A/B testing and other analysis.
    5. Amplification: Real-time testing provides confidence to Mastercard about the potential success of these offers and encourages its bank and merchant partners to co-market and co-fund these campaigns.
    6. Network effects: A few weeks after consumers submitted their stories about distant loved ones, Mastercard selected winners, produced videos of them surprising their friends and families, and used these videos in social media to encourage sharing.
    7. Incremental transactions: These programs translate into incremental business for banks who issue cards, for merchants where customers spend money, and for Mastercard, which gets a portion of every transaction.

    Source: Harvard Business Review Press

    CASE STUDY
    Mastercard in Asia (cont'd)

    Focus on the customer journey

    1. Emotional Spark
      Drives genuine personal stories
    2. Engagement
      Through Facebook
      and social media
    3. Offers
      From merchants
      and Mastercard assets
    4. Optimization
      Real-time testing of offers and themes
    5. Amplification
      Paid and organic programmatic buying
    6. Network Effects
      Sharing and
      mass engagement
    7. Incremental Transactions
      Win-win for all parties

    CASE STUDY
    Mastercard in Asia (cont'd)

    The Mastercard case highlights important lessons on how to engage customers:

    • Have a broad message. Brands need to connect with consumers over how they live and spend their time. Organizations need to go beyond the brand or product message to become more relevant to consumers' lives. Dove soap was very successful in creating a conversation among consumers with its "Real Beauty" campaign, which focused not on the brand or even the product category, but on how women and society view beauty.
    • Shift from storytelling to story making. To break through the clutter of advertising, companies need to move from storytelling to story making. A broader message that is emotionally engaging allows for a two-way conversation.
    • Be consistent with the brand value. The brand needs to stand for something, and the content should be relevant to and consistent with the image of the brand. Pepsi announced an award of $20 million in grants to individuals, businesses, and nonprofits that promote a new idea to make a positive impact on community. A large number of submissions were about social causes that had nothing to do with Pepsi, and some, like reducing obesity, were in conflict with Pepsi's product.
    • Create engagement that drives business. Too much entertainment in ads may engage customers but detract from both communicating the brand message and increasing sales. Simply measuring the number of video views provides only a partial picture of a program's success.

    Intelligent Automation

    PRIORITY 2

    • Extend Automation Practices with AI and ML

    AI and ML are rapidly growing. Organizations see the value of machines intelligently executing high-performance and dynamic tasks such as driving cars and detecting fraud. Senior leaders see AI and ML as opportunities to extend their business process automation investments.

    Introduction

    Intelligent automation is the next step in your business process automation journey

    What is intelligent automation (IA)?

    Intelligent automation (IA) is the combination of traditional automation technologies, such as business process management (BPM) and robotic process automation (RPA), with AI and ML. The goal is to further streamline and scale decision making across various business processes by:

    • Removing human interactions.
    • Addressing decisions that involve complex variables.
    • Automatically adapting processes to changing conditions.
    • Bridging disparate automation technologies into an integrated end-to-end value delivery pipeline.

    "For IA to succeed, employees must be involved in the transformation journey so they can experience firsthand the benefits of a new way of working and creating business value," (Cognizant).

    What is the difference between IA and hyperautomation?

    "Hyperautomation is the act of automating everything in an organization that can be automated. The intent is to streamline processes across an organization using intelligent automation, which includes AI, RPA and other technologies, to run without human intervention. … Hyperautomation is a business-driven, disciplined approach that organizations use to rapidly identify, vet, and automate as many business and IT processes as possible" (IBM, 2021).

    Note that hyperautomation often enables IA, but teams solely adopting IA do not need to abide to its automation-first principles.

    IA is a combination of various tools and technologies

    What tools and technologies are involved in IA?

    • Artificial intelligence (AI) & Machine Learning (ML) – AI systems perform tasks mimicking human intelligence such as learning from experience and problem solving. AI is making its own decisions without human intervention. Machine learning systems learn from experience and without explicit instructions. They learn patterns from data then analyze and make predictions based on past behavior and the patterns learned. AI is a combination of technologies and can include machine learning.
    • Intelligent Business Process Management System (iBPMS) – Combination of BPM tools with AI and other intelligence capabilities.
    • Robotic Process Automation (RPA) – Robots leveraging an application's UI rather than programmatic access. Automate rules-based, repetitive tasks performed by human workers with AI/ML.
    • Process Mining & Discovery – Process mining involves reading system event logs and application transactions and applying algorithmic analysis to automatically identify and map inferred business processes. Process discovery involves unintrusive virtual agents that sit on a user's desktop and record and monitor how they interact with applications to perform tasks and processes. Algorithms are then used to map and analyze the processes.
    • Intelligent Document Processing – The conversion of physical or unstructured documents into a structured, digital format that can be used in automation solutions. Optical character recognition (OCR) and natural language processing (NPL) are common tools used to enable this capability.
    • Advanced Analytics – The gathering, synthesis, transformation, and delivery of insightful and consumable information that supports data-driven decision making. Data is queried from various disparate sources and can take on a variety of structured and unstructured formats.

    The cycle of IA technologies

    Signals

    Process automation is an executive priority and requires organizational buy-in

    Stakeholders recognize the importance of business process automation and AI and are looking for ways to deliver more value using these technologies.

    • 90% of executives stated automating business workflows post-COVID-19 will ensure business continuity (Kofax, 2022).
    • 88% of executives stated they need to fast-track their end-to-end digital transformation (Kofax, 2022).

    However, the advertised benefits to vendors of enabling these desired automations may not be easily achievable because of:

    • Manual and undocumented business processes.
    • Fragmented and inaccessible systems.
    • Poor data quality, insights, and security.
    • The lack of process governance and management practice.
    A circle graph is shown with 49% of the circle coloured in dark blue, with the number 49% in the centre.

    of CXOs stated staff sufficiency, skill and engagement issues as a minor IT pain point compared to 51% of CIOs stated this issue as a major pain point.

    Source: CEO-CIO Alignment Diagnostics, August 2021 to July 2022; n=568.

    A circle graph is shown with 36% of the circle coloured in dark blue, with the number 36% in the centre.

    of organizations have already invested in AI or machine learning.

    Source: Tech Trends and Priorities 2023; N=662

    Drivers

    Quality & throughput

    Products and services delivered through an undefined and manual process risk the creation of preventable and catchable defects, security flaws and holes, missing information, and other quality issues. IA solutions consistently reinforce quality standards the same way across all products and services while tailoring outputs to meet an individual's specific needs. Success is dependent on the accurate interpretation and application of quality standards and the user's expectations.

    Worker productivity

    IA removes the tedious, routine, and mundane tasks that distract and restrict employees from doing more valuable, impactful, and cognitively focused activities. Practical insights can also be generated through IA tools that help employees make data-driven decisions, evaluate problems from different angles, and improve the usability and value of the products and services they produce.

    Good process management practices

    Automation magnifies existing inefficiencies of a business process management practice, such as unclear and outdated process documentation and incorrect assumptions. IA reinforces the importance of good business process optimization practices, such as removing waste and inefficiencies in a thoughtful way, choosing the most appropriate automation solution, and configuring the process in the right way to maximize the solution's value.

    Benefits & Risks

    Benefits

    • Documentation
    • Hands-Off
    • Reusability

    All business processes must be mapped and documented to be automated, including business rules, data entities, applications, and control points.

    IA can be configured and orchestrated to automatically execute when certain business, process, or technology conditions are met in an unattended or attended manner.

    IA is applicable in use cases beyond traditional business processes, such as automated testing, quality control, audit, website scraping, integration platform, customer service, and data transfer.

    Risks

    • Data Quality & Bias
    • Ethics
    • Recovery & Security
    • Management

    The accuracy and relevance of the decisions IA makes are dependent on the overall quality of the data
    used to train it.

    Some decisions can have significant reputational, moral, and ethical impacts if made incorrectly.
    The question is whether it is appropriate for a non-human to make that decision.

    IA is composed of technologies that can be compromised or fail. Without the proper monitoring, controls,
    and recovery protocols, impacted IA will generate significant business and IT costs and can potentially harm customers, employees, and the organization.

    Low- and no-code capabilities ease and streamline IA development, which makes it susceptible to becoming unmanageable. Discipline is needed to ensure IA owners are aware of the size and health of the IA portfolio.

    Address your pressure points to fully realize the benefits of this priority

    Success can be dependent on your ability to address your pressure points.

    Attracting and Retaining Talent

    Be transparent and support role changes.

    Plan to address the human sentiment with automation (e.g. job security) and the transition of the role to other activities.

    Maximizing the Return on Technology

    Automate applications across multiple business functions.

    Recognize the value opportunities of improving and automating the integration of cross-functional processes.

    Confidently Shifting to Digital

    Maximize the learning of automation fit.

    Select the right capabilities to demonstrate the value of IA while using lessons learned to establish the appropriate support.

    Addressing Competing Priorities

    Recognize automation opportunities with capability maps.

    Use a capability diagram to align strategic IA objectives with tactical and technical IA initiatives.

    Fostering a Collaborative Culture

    Involve the user in the delivery process.

    Maximize automation adoption by ensuring the user finds value in its use before deployment.

    Creating High-Throughput Teams

    Remove manual, error-prone, and mundane tasks.

    Look for ways to improve team throughput by removing wasteful activities, enforcing quality, and automating away tasks driving down productivity.

    Recommendations

    Build your business process automation playbook and practice

    Formalize your business process automation practice with a good toolkit and a repeatable set of tactics and techniques.

    • Clarify the problem being solved with IA.
    • Optimate your processes. Apply good practices to first optimize (opti-) and then automate (-mate) key business processes.
    • Deliver minimum viable automations (MVAs). Maximize the learning of automation solutions and business operational changes through small, strategic automation use cases.

    Related Research:

    Explore the various IA tooling options

    Each IA tool will address a different problem. Which tool to choose is dependent on a variety of factors, such as functional suitability, technology suitability, delivery and support capabilities, alignment to strategic business goals, and the value it is designed to deliver.

    Related Research:

    Recommendations

    Introduce AI and ML thoughtfully and with a plan

    Despite the many promises of AI, organizations are struggling to fully realize its potential. The reasons boil down to a lack of understanding of when these technologies should and shouldn't be used, as well as a fear of the unknown. The plan to adopt AI should include:

    • Understanding of what AI really means in practice.
    • Identifying specific applications of AI in the business.
    • Understanding the type of AI applicable for the situation.

    Related Research:

    Mitigate AI and ML bias

    Biases can be introduced into an IA system at any stage of the development process, from the data you collect, to the way you collect it, to which algorithms are used and what assumptions were made. In most cases, AI and ML bias is a is a social, political, and business problem.

    While bias may not be intentional nor completely prevented or eliminated, early detection, good design, and other proactive preventative steps can be taken to minimize its scope and impact.

    Related Research:

    CASE STUDY
    University Hospitals

    Challenge

    University Hospitals Cleveland (UH) faces the same challenge that every major hospital confronts regarding how to deliver increasingly complex, high-quality healthcare to a diverse population efficiently and economically. In 2017, UH embarked on a value improvement program aiming to improve quality while saving $400 million over a five-year period.

    In emergency department (ED) and inpatient units, leaders found anticipating demand difficult, and consequently units were often over-staffed when demand was low and under-staffed when demand was high. Hospital leaders were uncertain about how to reallocate resources based on capacity needs.

    Solution

    UH turned to Hospital IQ's Census Solution to proactively manage capacity, staff, and flow in the ED and inpatient areas.

    By applying AI, ML, and external data (e.g. weather forecasts) to the hospital's own data (including EMR data and hospital policies), the solution helped UH make two-day census forecasts that managers used to determine whether to open or close in-patient beds and, when necessary, divert low-acuity patients to other hospitals in the system to handle predicted patient volume.

    Source: University Hospitals

    Results

    ED boarding hours have declined by 10% and the hospital has seen a 50% reduction in the number of patients who leave the hospital without
    being seen.

    UH also predicts in advance patients ready for discharge and identifies roadblocks, reducing the average length of stay by 15%. UH is able to better manage staff, reducing overtime and cutting overall labor costs.

    The hospital has also increased staff satisfaction and improved patient safety by closing specific units on weekends and increasing the number of rooms that can be sterilized.

    Proactive Application Management

    PRIORITY 3

    • Strengthen Applications to Prevent and Minimize the Impact of Future Issues

    Application management is often viewed as a support function rather than an enabler of business growth. Focus and investments are only placed on application management when it becomes a problem. The lack of governance and practice accountability leaves this practice in a chaotic state: politics take over, resources are not strategically allocated, and customers are frustrated. As a result, application management is often reactive and brushed aside for new development.

    Introduction

    What is application management?

    Application management ensures valuable software is successfully delivered and is maintained for continuous and sustainable business operations. It contains a repeatable set of activities needed to rationalize and roadmap products and services while balancing priorities of new features and maintenance tasks.

    Unfortunately, application management is commonly perceived as a practice that solely addresses issues, updates, and incidents. However, application management teams are also tasked with new value delivery that was not part of the original release.

    Why is an effective application maintenance (reactive) practice not good enough?

    Application maintenance is the "process of modifying a software system or its components after delivery to correct faults, improve performance or other attributes, or adapt to a changed environment or business process," (IEEE, 1998). While it is critical to quickly fix defects and issues when they occur, reactively addressing them is more expensive than discovering them early and employing the practices to prevent them.

    Even if an application is working well, its framework, architecture, and technology may not be compatible with the possible upcoming changes stakeholders and vendors may want to undertake. Applications may not be problems now, but they soon can be.

    What motivates proactive application changes?

    This image shows the motivations for proactive application changes, sorted by external and internal sources.

    Proactive application management must be disciplined and applied strategically

    Proactive application management practices are critical to maintaining business continuity. They require continuous review and modification so that applications are resilient and can address current and future scenarios. Depending on the value of the application, its criticality to business operations, and its susceptibility to technology change, a more proactive management approach may be warranted. Stakeholders can then better manage resources and budget according to the needs of specific products.

    Reactive Management

    Run-to-Failure

    Fix and enhance the product when it breaks. In most cases, a plan is in place ahead of a failure, so that the problem can be addressed without significant disruption and costs.

    Preventive

    Regularly inspect and optimize the product to reduce the likelihood that it will fail in the future. Schedule inspections based on a specific timeframe or usage threshold.

    Predictive

    Predict failures before they happen using performance and usage data to alert teams when products are at risk of failure according to specified conditions.

    Reliability and Risk Based

    Analyze all possible failure scenarios for each component of the product and create tailored delivery plans to improve the stability, reliability, and value of each product.

    Proactive Management

    Signals

    Applications begin to degrade as soon as they are used

    Today's applications are tomorrow's shelfware. They gradually lose their value, stability, robustness, and compatibility with other enterprise technologies. The longer these applications are left unattended or simply "keeping the lights on," the more risks they will bring to the application portfolio, such as:

    • Discovery and exploitation of security flaws and gaps.
    • Increasing the lock-in to specific vendor technologies.
    • Inconsistent application performance across various workloads.

    These impacts are further compounded by the continuous work done on a system burdened with technical debt. Technical debt describes the result of avoided costs that, over time, cause ongoing business impacts. Left unaddressed, technical debt can become an existential threat that risks your organization's ability to effectively compete and serve its customers. Unfortunately, most organizations have a significant, growing, unmanageable technical debt portfolio.

    A circle graph is shown with 60% of the circle coloured in dark green, with the number 60% in the centre.

    of respondents stated they saw an increase in perceived change in technical debt during the past three years. A quarter of respondents indicated that it stayed the same.

    Source: McKinsey Digital, 2020.

    US
    $4.35
    Million

    is the average cost of a data breach in 2022. This figure represents a 2.6% increase from last year. The average cost has climbed 12.7% since 2020.

    Source: IBM, 2022; N=537.

    Drivers

    Technical debt

    Historical decisions to meet business demands by deferring key quality, architectural, or other software delivery activities often lead to inefficient and incomplete code, fragile legacy systems, broken processes, data quality problems, and the other contributors to technical debt. The impacts for this challenge is further heightened if organizations are not actively refactoring and updating their applications behind the scenes. Proactive application management is intended to raise awareness of application fragility and prioritize comprehensive refactoring activities alongside new feature development.

    Long-term application value

    Applications are designed, developed, and tested against a specific set of parameters which may become less relevant over time as the business matures, technology changes, and user behaviors and interactions shift. Continuous monitoring of the application system, regular stakeholder and user feedback, and active technology trend research and vendor engagement will reveal tasks to prepare an application for future value opportunities or stability and resilience concerns.

    Security and resiliency

    Innovative approaches to infiltrating and compromising applications are becoming prevailing stakeholder concerns. The loopholes and gaps in existing application security protocols, control points, and end-user training are exploited to gain the trust of unsuspecting users and systems. Proactive application management enforces continuous security reviews to determine whether applications are at risk. The goal is to prevent an incident from happening by hardening or complementing measures already in place.

    Benefits & Risks

    Benefits

    • Consistent Performance
    • Robustness
    • Operating Costs

    Users expect the same level of performance and experience from their applications in all scenarios. A proactive approach ensures the configurations meet the current needs of users and dependent technologies.

    Proactively managed applications are resilient to the latest security concerns and upcoming trends.

    Continuous improvements to the underlying architecture, codebase, and interfaces can minimize the cost to maintain and operate the application, such as the transition to a loosely coupled architecture and the standardization of REST APIs.

    Risks

    • Stakeholder Buy-In
    • Delayed Feature Releases
    • Team Capacity
    • Discipline

    Stakeholders may not see the association between the application's value and its technical quality.

    Updates and enhancements are system changes much like any application function. Depending
    on the priority of these changes, new functions may be pushed off to a future release cycle.

    Applications teams require dedicated capacity to proactively manage applications, but they are often occupied meeting other stakeholder demands.

    Overinvesting in certain application management activities (such as refactoring, re-architecture, and redesign) can create more challenges. Knowing how much to do is important.

    Address your pressure points to fully realize the benefits of this priority

    Success can be dependent on your ability to address your pressure points.

    Attracting and Retaining Talent

    Shift focus from maintenance to innovation.

    Work on the most pressing and critical requests first, with a prioritization framework reflecting cross-functional priorities.

    Maximizing the Return on Technology

    Improve the reliability of mission-critical applications.

    Regularly verify and validate applications are up to date with the latest patches and fixes and comply with industry good practices and regulations.

    Confidently Shifting to Digital

    Prepare applications to support digital tools and technologies.

    Focus enhancements on the key components required to support the integration, performance, and security needs of digital.

    Addressing Competing Priorities

    Rationalize the health of the applications.

    Use data-driven, compelling insights to justify the direction and prioritization of applications initiatives.

    Fostering a Collaborative Culture

    Include the technical perspective in the viability of future applications plans.

    Demonstrate how poorly maintained applications impede the team's ability to deliver confidently and quickly.

    Creating High-Throughput Teams

    Simplify applications to ease delivery and maintenance.

    Refactor away application complexities and align the application portfolio to a common quality standard to reduce the effort to deliver and test changes.

    Recommendations

    Reinforce your application maintenance practice

    Maintenance is often viewed as a support function rather than an enabler of business growth. Focus and investments are only placed on maintenance when it becomes a problem.

    • Justify the necessity of streamlined maintenance.
    • Strengthen triaging and prioritization practices.
    • Establish and govern a repeatable process.

    Ensure product issues, incidents, defects, and change requests are promptly handled to minimize business and IT risks.

    Related Research:

    Build an application management practice

    Apply the appropriate management approaches to maintain business continuity and balance priorities and commitments among maintenance and new development requests.

    This practice serves as the foundation for creating exceptional customer experience by emphasizing cross-functional accountability for business value and product and service quality.

    Related Research:

    Recommendations

    Manage your technical debt

    Technical debt is a type of technical risk, which in turn is business risk. It's up to the business to decide whether to accept technical debt or mitigate it. Create a compelling argument to stakeholders as to why technical debt should be a business priority rather than just an IT one.

    • Define and identify your technical debt.
    • Conduct a business impact analysis.
    • Identify opportunities to better manage technical debt.

    Related Research:

    Gauge your application's health

    Application portfolio management is nearly impossible to perform without an honest and thorough understanding of your portfolio's alignment to business capabilities, business value, total cost of ownership, end-user reception and satisfaction, and technical health.

    Develop data-driven insights to help you decide which applications to retire, upgrade, retrain on, or maintain to meet the demands of the business.

    Related Research:

    Recommendations

    Adopt site reliability engineering (SRE) and DevOps practices

    Site reliability engineering (SRE) is an operational model for running online services more reliably by a team of dedicated reliability-focused engineers.

    DevOps, an operational philosophy promoting development and operations collaboration, can bring the critical insights to make application management practices through SRE more valuable.

    Related Research:

    CASE STUDY
    Government Agency

    Goal

    A government agency needed to implement a disciplined, sustainable application delivery, planning, and management process so their product delivery team could deliver features and changes faster with higher quality. The goal was to ensure change requests, fixes, and new features would relieve requester frustrations, reduce regression issues, and allow work to be done on agreeable and achievable priorities organization-wide. The new model needed to increase practice efficiency and visibility in order to better manage technical debt and focus on value-added solutions.

    Solution

    This organization recognized a number of key challenges that were inhibiting its team's ability to meet its goals:

    • The product backlog had become too long and unmanageable.
    • Delivery resources were not properly allocated to meet the skills and capabilities needed to successfully meet commitments.
    • Quality wasn't defined or enforced, which generated mounting technical debt.
    • There was a lack of clear metrics and defined roles and responsibilities.
    • The business had unrealistic and unachievable expectations.

    Source: Info-Tech Workshop

    Key practices implemented

    • Schedule quarterly business satisfaction surveys.
    • Structure and facilitate regular change advisory board meetings.
    • Define and enforce product quality standards.
    • Standardize a streamlined process with defined roles.
    • Configure management tools to better handle requests.

    Multisource Systems

    PRIORITY 4

    • Manage an Ecosystem Composed of In-House and Outsourced Systems

    Various market and company factors are motivating a review on resource and system sourcing strategies. The right sourcing model provides key skills, resources, and capabilities to meet innovation, time to market, financial, and quality goals of the business. However, organizations struggle with how best to support sourcing partners and to allocate the right number of resources to maximize success.

    Introduction

    A multisource system is an ecosystem of integrated internally and externally developed applications, data, and infrastructure. These technologies can be custom developed, heavily configured vendor solutions, or they may be commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) solutions. These systems can also be developed, supported, and managed by internal staff, in partnership with outsourced contractors, or be completely outsourced. Multisource systems should be configured and orchestrated in a way that maximizes the delivery of specific value drivers for the targeted audience.

    Successfully selecting a sourcing approach is not a simple RFP exercise to choose the lowest cost

    Defining and executing a sourcing approach can be a significant investment and risk because of the close interactions third-party services and partners will have with internal staff, enterprise applications and business capabilities. A careful selection and design is necessary.

    The selection of a sourcing partner is not simple. It involves the detailed inspection and examination of different candidates and matching their fit to the broader vision of the multisource system. In cases where control is critical, technology stack and resource sourcing consolidation to a few vendors and partners is preferred. In other cases, where worker productivity and system flexibility are highly prioritized, a plug-and-play best-of-breed approach is preferred.

    Typical factors involved in sourcing decisions.

    Sourcing needs to be driven by your department and system strategies

    How does the department want to be perceived?

    The image that your applications department and teams want to reflect is frequently dependent on the applications they deliver and support, the resources they are composed of, and the capabilities they provide.

    Therefore, choosing the right sourcing approach should be driven by understanding who the teams are and want to be (e.g. internal builder, an integrator, a plug-in player), what they can or want to do (e.g. custom-develop or implement), and what they can deliver or support (e.g. cloud or on-premises) must be established.

    What value is the system delivering?

    Well-integrated systems are the lifeblood of your organization. They provide the capabilities needed to deliver value to customers, employees, and stakeholders. However, underlying system components may not be sourced under a unified strategy, which can lead to duplicate vendor services and high operational costs.

    The right sourcing approach ensures your partners address key capabilities in your system's delivery and support, and that they are positioned to maximize the value of critical and high-impact components.

    Signals

    Business demand may outpace what vendors can support or offer

    Outsourcing and shifting to a buy-over-build applications strategy are common quick fixes to dealing with capacity and skills gaps. However, these quick fixes often become long-term implementations that are not accounted for in the sourcing selection process. Current application and resource sourcing strategies must be reviewed to ensure that vendor arrangements meet the current and upcoming demands and challenges of the business, customers, and enterprise technologies, such as:

    • Pressure from stakeholders to lower operating costs while maintaining or increasing quality and throughput.
    • Technology lock-in that addresses short-term needs but inhibits long-term growth and maturity.
    • Team capacity and talent acquisition not meeting the needs of the business.
    A circle graph is shown with 42% of the circle coloured in dark brown, with the number 42% in the centre.

    of respondents stated they outsourced software development fully or partly in the last 12 months (2021).

    Source: Coding Sans, 2021.

    A circle graph is shown with 65% of the circle coloured in dark brown, with the number 65% in the centre.

    of respondents stated they were at least somewhat satisfied with the result of outsourcing software development.

    Source: Coding Sans, 2021.

    Drivers

    Business-managed applications

    Employees are implementing and building applications without consulting, notifying, or heeding the advice of IT. IT is often ill-equipped and under-resourced to fight against shadow IT. Instead, organizations are shifting the mindset of "fight shadow IT" to "embrace business-managed applications," using good practices in managing multisource systems. A multisource approach strikes the right balance between user empowerment and centralized control with the solutions and architecture that can best enable it.

    Unique problems to solve

    Point solutions offer features to address unique use cases in uncommon technology environments. However, point solutions are often deployed in siloes with limited integration or overlap with other solutions. The right sourcing strategy accommodates the fragmented nature of point solutions into a broader enterprise system strategy, whether that be:

    • Multisource best of breed – integrate various technologies that provide subsets of the features needed for supporting business functions.
    • Multisource custom – integrate systems built in-house with technologies developed by external organizations.
    • Vendor add-ons and integrations – enhance an existing vendor's offering by using their system add-ons as upgrades, new add-ons, or integrations.

    Vendor services

    Some vendor services in a multisource environment may be redundant, conflicting, or incompatible. Given that multisource systems are regularly changing, it is difficult to identify what services are affected, what would be needed to fill the gap of the removed solution, or which redundant services should be removed.

    A multisource approach motivates the continuous rationalization of your vendor services and partners to determine the right mixture of in-house and outsourced resources, capabilities, and technologies.

    Benefits & Risks

    Benefits

    • Business-Focused Solution
    • Flexibility
    • Cost Optimization

    Multisource systems can be designed to support an employee's ability to select the tools they want and need.

    The environment is architected in a loosely coupled approach to allow applications to be easily added, removed, and modified with minimized impact to other integrated applications.

    Rather than investing in large solutions upfront, applications are adopted when they are needed and are removed when little value is gained. Disciplined application portfolio management is necessary to see the full value of this benefit.

    Risks

    • Manageable Sprawl
    • Policy Adherence
    • Integration & Compatibility

    The increased number and diversity of applications in multisource system environments can overwhelm system managers who do not have an effective application portfolio management practice.

    Fragmented application implementations risk inconsistent adherence to security and other quality policies, especially in situations where IT is not involved.

    Application integration can quickly become tangled, untraceable, and unmanageable because of varying team and vendor preferences for specific integration technologies and techniques.

    Address your pressure points to fully realize the benefits of this priority

    Success can be dependent on your ability to address your pressure points.

    Attracting and Retaining Talent

    Enable business-managed applications.

    Create the integrations to enable the easy connection of desired tools to enterprise systems with the appropriate guardrails.

    Maximizing the Return on Technology

    Enhance the functionality of existing applications.

    Complement current application capability gaps with data, features, and services from third-party applications.

    Confidently Shifting to Digital

    Use best-of-breed tools to meet specific digital needs.

    Select the best tools to meet the unique and special functional needs of the digital vision.

    Addressing Competing Priorities

    Agree on a common philosophy on system composition.

    Establish an owner of the multisource system to guide how the system should mature as the organization grows.

    Fostering a Collaborative Culture

    Discuss how applications can work together better in an ecosystem.

    Build committees to discuss how applications can better support each other and drive more value.

    Creating High-Throughput Teams

    Alleviate delivery bottlenecks and issues.

    Leverage third-party sources to fill skills and capacity gaps until a long-term solution can be implemented.

    Recommendations

    Define the goals of your applications department and product vision

    Understanding the applications team's purpose and image is critical in determining how the system they are managing and the skills and capacities they need should be sourced.

    Changing and conflicting definitions of value and goals make it challenging to convey an agreeable strategy of the multisource system. An achievable vision and practical tactics ensure all parties in the multisource system are moving in the same direction.

    Related Research:

    Develop a sourcing partner strategy

    Almost half of all sourcing initiatives do not realize projected savings, and the biggest reason is the choice of partner (Zhang et al., 2018). Making the wrong choice means inferior products, higher costs and the loss of both clients and reputation.

    Choosing the right sourcing partner involves understanding current skills and capacities, finding the right matching partner based on a desired profile, and managing a good working relationship that sees short-term gains and supports long-term goals.

    Related Research:

    Recommendations

    Strengthen enterprise integration practices

    Integration strategies that are focused solely on technology are likely to complicate rather than simplify because little consideration is given on how other systems and processes will be impacted. Enterprise integration needs to bring together business process, applications, and data – in that order.

    Kick-start the process of identifying opportunities for improvement by mapping how applications and data are coordinated to support business activities.

    Related Research:

    Manage your solution architecture and application portfolio

    Haphazardly implementing and integrating applications can generate significant security, performance, and data risks. A well-thought-through solution architecture is essential in laying the architecture quality principles and roadmap on how the multisource system can grow and evolve in a sustainable and maintainable way.

    Good application portfolio management complements the solution architecture as it indicates when low-value and unused applications should be removed to reduce system complexity.

    Related Research:

    Recommendations

    Embrace business-managed applications

    Multisource systems bring a unique opportunity to support the business and end users' desire to implement and develop their own applications. However, traditional models of managing applications may not accommodate the specific IT governance and management practices required to operate business-managed applications:

    • A collaborative and trusting business-IT relationship is key.
    • The role of IT must be reimagined.
    • Business must be accountable for its decisions.

    Related Research:

    CASE STUDY
    Cognizant

    Situation

    • Strives to be primarily an industry-aligned organization that delivers multiple service lines in multiple geographies.
    • Cognizant seeks to carefully consider client culture to create a one-team environment.
    • Value proposition is a consultative approach bringing thought leadership and mutually adding value to the relationship vs. the more traditional order-taker development partner.
    • Wants to share in solution development to facilitate shared successes. Geographic alignment drives knowledge of the client and their challenges, not just about time zone and supportability.
    • Offers one of the largest offshore capabilities in the world, supported by local and nearshore resources to drive local knowledge.
    • Today's clients don't typically want a black box, they are sophisticated and want transparency around the process and solution, to have a partner.
    • Clients do want to know where the work is being delivered from, how it's being done.

    Source: interview with Jay MacIsaac, Cognizant.

    Approach

    • Best relationship comes where teams operate as one.
    • Clients are seeking value, not a development black box.
    • Clients want to have a partner they can engage with, not just an order taker.
    • Want to build a one-team culture with shared goals and deliver business value.
    • Seek a partner that will add to their thinking not echo it.

    Results

    • Cognizant is continuing to deliver double-digit growth and continues to strive for top quartile performance.
    • Growth in the client base has seen the company grow to over 340,000 associates worldwide.

    Digital Organization as a Platform

    PRIORITY 5

    • Create a Common Digital Interface to Access All Products and Services

    A digital platform enables organizations to leverage a flexible, reliable, and scalable foundation to create a valuable DX, ease delivery and management efforts, maximize existing investments, and motivate the broader shift to digital. This approach provides a standard to architect, integrate, configure, and modernize the applications that compose the platform.

    Introduction

    What is digital organization as a platform (DOaaP)?

    Digital organization as a platform (DOaaP) is a collection of integrated digital services, products, applications, and infrastructure that is used as a vehicle to meet and exceed an organization's digital strategies. It often serves as an accessible "place for exchanges of information, goods, or services to occur between producers and consumers as well as the community that interacts
    with said platform" (Watts, 2020).

    DOaaP involves a strategy that paves the way for organizations to be digital. It helps organizations use their assets (e.g. data, processes, products, services) in the most effective ways and become more open to cooperative delivery, usage, and management. This opens opportunities for innovation and cross-department collaborations.

    How is DOaaP described?

    1. Open and Collaborative
      • Open organization: open data, open APIs, transparency, and user participation.
      • Collaboration, co-creation, crowdsourcing, and innovation
    2. Accessible and Connected
      • Digital inclusion
      • Channel ubiquity
      • Integrity and interoperability
      • Digital marketplace
    3. Digital and Programmable
      • Digital identity
      • Policies and processes as code
      • Digital products and services
      • Enabling digital platforms

    Digital organizations follow a common set of principles and practices

    Customer-centricity

    Digital organizations are driven by customer focus, meeting and exceeding customer expectations. It must design its services with a "digital first" principle, providing access through every expected channel and including seamless integration and interoperability with various departments, partners, and third-party services. It also means creating trust in its ability to provide secure services and to keep privacy and ethics as core pillars.

    Leadership, management, and strategies

    Digital leadership brings customer focus to the enterprise and its structures and organizes efficient networks and ecosystems. Accomplishing this means getting rid of silos and a siloed mentality and aligning on a digital vision to design policies and services that are efficient, cost-effective, and provide maximum benefit to the user. Asset sharing, co-creation, and being open and transparent become cornerstones of a digital organization.

    Infrastructure

    Providing digital services across demographics and geographies requires infrastructure, and that in turn requires long-term vision, smart investments, and partnerships with various source partners to create the necessary foundational infrastructure upon which to build digital services.

    Digitization and automation

    Automation and digitization of processes and services, as well as creating digital-first products, lead to increased efficiency and reach of the organization across demographics and geographies. Moreover, by taking a digital-first approach, digital organizations future-proof their services and demonstrate their commitment to stakeholders.

    Enabling platforms

    DOaaP embraces open standards, designing and developing organizational platforms and ecosystems with a cloud-first mindset and sound API strategies. Developer experience must also take center stage, providing the necessary tools and embracing Agile and DevOps practices and culture become prerequisites. Cybersecurity and privacy are central to the digital platform; hence they must be part of the design and development principles and practices.

    Signals

    The business expects support for digital products and services

    Digital transformation continues to be a high-priority initiative for many organizations, and they see DOaaP as an effective way to enable and exploit digital capabilities. However, DOaaP unleashes new strategies, opportunities, and challenges that are elusive or unfamiliar to business leaders. Barriers in current business operating models may limit DOaaP success, such as:

    • Department and functional silos
    • Dispersed, fragmented and poor-quality data
    • Ill-equipped and under-skilled resources to support DOaaP adoption
    • System fragmentation and redundancies
    • Inconsistent integration tactics employed across systems
    • Disjointed user experience leading to low engagement and adoption

    DOaaP is not just about technology, and it is not the sole responsibility of either IT or business. It is the collective responsibility of the organization.

    A circle graph is shown with 47% of the circle coloured in dark blue, with the number 47% in the centre.

    of organizations plan to unlock new value through digital. 50% of organizations are planning major transformation over the next three years.

    Source: Nash Squared, 2022.

    A circle graph is shown with 70% of the circle coloured in dark blue, with the number 70% in the centre.

    of organizations are undertaking digital expansion projects focused on scaling their business with technology. This result is up from 57% in 2021.

    Source: F5 Inc, 2022.

    Drivers

    Unified brand and experience

    Users should have the same experience and perception of a brand no matter what product or service they use. However, fragmented implementation of digital technologies and inconsistent application of design standards makes it difficult to meet this expectation. DOaaP embraces a single design and DX standard for all digital products and services, which creates a consistent perception of your organization's brand and reputation irrespective of what products and services are being used and how they are accessed.

    Accessibility

    Rapid advancement of end-user devices and changes to end-user behaviors and expectations often outpace an organization's ability to meet these requirements. This can make certain organization products and services difficult to find, access and leverage. DOaaP creates an intuitive and searchable interface to all products and services and enables the strategic combination of technologies to collectively deliver more value.

    Justification for modernization

    Many opportunities are left off the table when legacy systems are abstracted away rather than modernized. However, legacy systems may not justify the investment in modernization because their individual value is outweighed by the cost. A DOaaP initiative motivates decision makers to look at the entire system (i.e. modern and legacy) to determine which components need to be brought up to a minimum digital state. The conversation has now changed. Legacy systems should be modernized to increase the collective benefit of the entire DOaaP.

    Benefits & Risks

    Benefits

    • Look & Feel
    • User Adoption
    • Shift to Digital

    A single, modern, customizable interface enables a common look and feel no matter what and how the platform is being accessed.

    Organizations can motivate and encourage the adoption and use of all products and services through the platform and increase the adoption of underused technologies.

    DOaaP motivates and supports the modernization of data, processes, and systems to meet the goals and objectives outlined in the broader digital transformation strategy.

    Risks

    • Data Quality
    • System Stability
    • Ability to Modernize
    • Business Model Change

    Each system may have a different definition of commonly used entities (e.g. customer), which can cause data quality issues when information is shared among these systems.

    DOaaP can stress the performance of underlying systems due to the limitations of some systems to handle increased traffic.

    Some systems cannot be modernized due to cost constraints, business continuity risks, vendor lock-in, legacy and lore, or other blocking factors.

    Limited appetite to make the necessary changes to business operations in order to maximize the value of DOaaP technologies.

    Address your pressure points to fully realize the benefits of this priority

    Success can be dependent on your ability to address your pressure points.

    Attracting and Retaining Talent Promote and showcase achievements and successes. Share the valuable and innovative work of your teams across the organization and with the public.
    Maximizing the Return on Technology Increase visibility of underused applications. Promote the adoption and use of all products and services through the platform and use the lessons learned to justify removal, updates or modernizations.
    Confidently Shifting to Digital Bring all applications up to a common digital standard. Define the baseline digital state all applications, data, and processes must be in to maximize the value of the platform.
    Addressing Competing Priorities Map to a holistic platform vision, goals and objectives. Work with relevant stakeholders, teams and end users to agree on a common directive considering all impacted perspectives.
    Fostering a Collaborative Culture Ensure the platform is configured to meet the individual needs of the users. Tailor the interface and capabilities of the platform to address users' functional and personal concerns.
    Creating High-Throughput Teams Abstract the enterprise system to expedite delivery. Use the platform to standardize application system access to simplify platform changes and quicken development and testing.

    Recommendations

    Define your platform vision

    Organizations realize that a digital model is the way to provide more effective services to their customers and end users in a cost-effective, innovative, and engaging fashion. DOaaP is a way to help support this transition.

    However, various platform stakeholders will have different interpretations of and preferences for what this platform is intended to solve, what benefits it is supposed to deliver, and what capabilities it will deliver. A grounded vision is imperative to steer the roadmap and initiatives.

    Related Research:

    Assess and modernize your applications

    Certain applications may not sufficiently support the compatibility, flexibility, and efficiency requirements of DOaaP. While workaround technologies and tactics can be employed to overcome these application challenges, the full value of the DOaaP may not be realized.

    Reviewing the current state of the application portfolio will indicate the functional and value limitations of what DOaaP can provide and an indication of the scope of investment needed to bring applications up to a minimum state.

    Related Research:

    Recommendations

    Understand and evaluate end-user needs

    Technology has reached a point where it's no longer difficult for teams to build functional and valuable digital platforms. Rather, the difficulty lies in creating an interface and platform that people want to use and use frequently.

    While it is important to increase the access and promotion of all products and services, orchestrating and configuring them in a way to deliver a satisfying experience is even more important. Applications teams must first learn about and empathize with the needs of end users.

    Related Research:

    Architect your platform

    Formalizing and constructing DOaaP just for the sake of doing so often results in an initiative that is lengthy and costly and ends up being considered a failure.

    The build and optimization of the platform must be predicated on a thorough understanding of the DOaaP's goals, objectives, and priorities and the business capabilities and process they are meant to support and enable. The appropriate architecture and delivery practices can then be defined and employed.

    Related Research:

    CASE STUDY
    e-Estonia

    Situation

    The digital strategy of Estonia resulted in e-Estonia, with the vision of "creating a society with more transparency, trust, and efficiency." Estonia has addressed the challenge by creating structures, organizations, and a culture of innovation, and then using the speed and efficiency of digital infrastructure, apps, and services. This strategy can reduce or eliminate bureaucracy through transparency and automation.

    Estonia embarked on its journey to making digital a priority in 1994-1996, focusing on a committed investment in infrastructure and digital literacy. With that infrastructure in place, they started providing digital services like an e-banking service (1996), e-tax and mobile parking (2002), and then went full steam ahead with a digital information interoperability platform in 2001, digital identity in 2002, e-health in 2008, and e-prescription in 2010. The government is now strategizing for AI.

    Results

    This image contains the results of the e-Estonia case study results

    Source: e-Estonia

    Practices employed

    The e-Estonia digital government model serves as a reference for governments across the world; this is acknowledged by the various awards it has received, like #2 in "internet freedom," awarded by Freedom House in 2019; #1 on the "digital health index," awarded by the Bertelsmann Foundation in 2019; and #1 on "start-up friendliness," awarded by Index Venture in 2018.

    References

    "15th State of Agile Report." Digital.ai, 2021. Web.
    "2022 HR Trends Report." McLean & Company, 2022.
    "2022: State of Application Strategy Report." F5 Inc, 2022.
    "Are Executives Wearing Rose-Colored Glasses Around Digital Transformation?" Cyara, 2021. Web.
    "Cost of a Data Breach Report 2022." IBM, 2022. Web.
    Dalal, Vishal, et al. "Tech Debt: Reclaiming Tech Equity." McKinsey Digital, Oct. 2020. Web.
    "Differentiating Between Intelligent Automation and Hyperautomation." IBM, 15 October 2021. Web.
    "Digital Leadership Report 2021." Harvey Nash Group, 2021.
    "Digital Leadership Report 2022: The State of Digital." Nash Squared, 2022. Web.
    Gupta, Sunil. "Driving Digital Strategy: A Guide to Reimagining Your Business." Harvard Business Review Press, 2018. Web.
    Haff, Gordon. "State of Application Modernization Report 2022." Konveyor, 2022. Web.
    "IEEE Standard for Software Maintenance: IEEE Std 1219-1998." IEEE Standard for Software Maintenance, 1998. Accessed Dec. 2015.
    "Intelligent Automation." Cognizant, n.d. Web.
    "Kofax 2022: Intelligent Automation Benchmark Study". Kofax, 2021. Web.
    McCann, Leah. "Barco's Virtual Classroom at UCL: A Case Study for the Future of All University Classrooms?" rAVe, 2 July 2020, Web.
    "Proactive Staffing and Patient Prioritization to Decompress ED and Reduce Length of Stay." University Hospitals, 2018. Web.
    "Secrets of Successful Modernization." looksoftware, 2013. Web.
    "State of Software Development." Coding Sans, 2021. Web.
    "The State of Low-Code/No-Code." Creatio, 2021. Web.
    "We Have Built a Digital Society and We Can Show You How." e-Estonia. n.d. Web.
    Zanna. "The 5 Types of Experience Series (1): Brand Experience Is Your Compass." Accelerate in Experience, 9 February 2020. Web.
    Zhang, Y. et al. "Effects of Risks on the Performance of Business Process Outsourcing Projects: The Moderating Roles of Knowledge Management Capabilities." International Journal of Project Management, 2018, vol. 36 no. 4, 627-639.

    Research Contributors and Experts

    This is a picture of Chris Harrington

    Chris Harrington
    Chief Technology Officer
    Carolinas Telco Federal Credit Union

    Chris Harrington is Chief Technology Officer (CTO) of Carolinas Telco Federal Credit Union. Harrington is a proven leader with over 20 years of experience developing and leading information technology and cybersecurity strategies and teams in the financial industry space.

    This is a picture of Benjamin Palacio

    Benjamin Palacio
    Senior Information Technology Analyst County of Placer

    Benjamin Palacio has been working in the application development space since 2007 with a strong focus on system integrations. He has seamlessly integrated applications data across multiple states into a single reporting solution for management teams to evaluate, and he has codeveloped applications to manage billions in federal funding. He is also a CSAC-credentialed IT Executive (CA, USA).

    This is a picture of Scott Rutherford

    Scott Rutherford
    Executive Vice President, Technology
    LGM Financial Services Inc.

    Scott heads the Technology division of LGM Financial Services Inc., a leading provider of warranty and financing products to automotive OEMs and dealerships in Canada. His responsibilities include strategy and execution of data and analytics, applications, and technology operations.

    This is a picture of Robert Willatts

    Robert Willatts
    IT Manager, Enterprise Business Solutions and Project Services
    Town of Newmarket

    Robert is passionate about technology, innovation, and Smart City Initiatives. He makes customer satisfaction as the top priority in every one of his responsibilities and accountabilities as an IT manager, such as developing business applications, implementing and maintaining enterprise applications, and implementing technical solutions. Robert encourages communication, collaboration, and engagement as he leads and guides IT in the Town of Newmarket.

    This is a picture of Randeep Grewal

    Randeep Grewal
    Vice President, Enterprise Applications
    Red Hat

    Randeep has over 25 years of experience in enterprise applications, advanced analytics, enterprise data management, and consulting services, having worked at numerous blue-chip companies. In his most recent role, he is the Vice President of Enterprise Applications at Red Hat. Reporting to the CIO, he is responsible for Red Hat's core business applications with a focus on enterprise transformation, application architecture, engineering, and operational excellence. He previously led the evolution of Red Hat into a data-led company by maturing the enterprise data and analytics function to include data lake, streaming data, data governance, and operationalization of analytics for decision support.

    Prior to Red Hat, Randeep was the director of global services strategy at Lenovo, where he led the strategy using market data to grow Lenovo's services business by over $400 million in three years. Prior to Lenovo, Randeep was the director of advanced analytics at Alliance One and helped build an enterprise data and analytics function. His earlier work includes seven years at SAS, helping SAS become a leader in business analytics, and at KPMG consulting, where he managed services engagements at Fortune 100 companies.

    Manage Exponential Value Relationships

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}210|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Vendor Management
    • Parent Category Link: /vendor-management

    Implementing exponential IT will require businesses to work with external vendors to facilitate the rapid adoption of cutting-edge technologies such as generative artificial intelligence. IT leaders must:

    These challenges require new skills which build trust and collaboration among vendors.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    Outcome-based relationships require a higher degree of trust than traditional vendor relationships. Build trust by sharing risks and rewards.

    Impact and Result

    • Assess your readiness to take on the new types of vendor relationships that will help you succeed.
    • Identify where you need to build your capabilities in order to successfully manage relationships.
    • Successfully manage outcomes, financials, risk, and relationships in complex vendor relationships.

    Manage Exponential Value Relationships Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Manage Exponential Value Relationships Storyboard – Learn about the new era of exponential vendor relationships and the capabilities needed to succeed.

    This research walks you through how to assess your capabilities to undertake a new model of vendor relationships and drive exponential IT.

    • Manage Exponential Value Relationships Storyboard

    2. Exponential Relationships Readiness Assessment – Assess your readiness to engage in exponential vendor partnerships.

    This tool will facilitate your readiness assessment.

    • Exponential Relationships Readiness Assessment
    [infographic]

    Further reading

    Manage Exponential Value Relationships

    Are you ready to manage outcome-based agreements?

    Analyst Perspective

    Outcome-based agreements require a higher degree of mutual trust.

    Kim Osborne Rodriguez

    Exponential IT brings with it an exciting new world of cutting-edge technology and increasingly accelerated growth of business and IT. But adopting and driving change through this paradigm requires new capabilities to grow impactful and meaningful partnerships with external vendors who can help implement technologies like artificial intelligence and virtual reality.

    Building outcome-based partnerships involves working very closely with vendors who, in many cases, will have just as much to lose as the organizations implementing these new technologies. This requires a greater degree of trust between parties than a standard vendor relationship. It also drastically increases the risks to both organizations; as each loses some control over data and outcomes, they must trust that the other organization will follow through on commitments and obligations.

    Outcome-based partnerships build upon traditional vendor management practices and create the potential for organizations to embrace emerging technology in new ways.

    Kim Osborne Rodriguez
    Research Director, CIO Advisory
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive Summary

    Exponential IT drives change

    Vendor relationships must evolve

    To deliver exponential value

    Implementing exponential IT will require businesses to work with external vendors to facilitate the rapid adoption of cutting-edge technologies such as generative artificial intelligence. IT leaders must:

    • Build strategic relationships with external entities to support the autonomization of the enterprise.
    • Procure, operate, and manage contracts and performance in outcome-based relationships.
    • Build relationships with new vendors.

    These challenges require new skills which build trust and collaboration with vendors.

    Traditional vendor management approaches are still important for organizations to develop and maintain. But exponential relationships bring new challenges:

    • A shift from managing technology service agreements to managing business capability agreements
    • Increased vendor access to intellectual property, confidential information, and customers

    IT leaders must adapt traditional vendor management capabilities to successfully lead this change.

    Outcome-based relationships should not be undertaken lightly as they can significantly impact the risk profile of the organization. Use this research to:

    • Assess your foundational vendor management capabilities as well as the transformative capabilities you need to manage outcome-based relationships.
    • Identify where you need to build your capabilities in order to successfully manage relationships.
    • Successfully manage outcomes, financials, risk, and relationships in complex vendor partnerships.

    Exponential value relationships will help drive exponential IT and autonomization of the enterprise.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Outcome-based partnerships require a higher degree of trust than traditional vendor relationships. Build trust by sharing risks and rewards.

    Vendor relationships can be worth billions of dollars

    Positive vendor relationships directly impact the bottom line, sometimes to the tune of billions of dollars annually.

    • Organizations typically spend 40% to 80% of their total budget on external suppliers.
    • Greater supplier trust translates directly to greater business profits, even in traditional vendor relationships.1
    • Based on over a decade of data from vehicle manufacturers, greater supplier relationships nearly doubled the unit profit margin on vehicles, contributing over $20 billion to Toyota’s annual profits based on typical sales volume.2
    • Having positive vendor relationships can be instrumental in times of crisis – when scarcity looms, vendors often choose to support their best customers.3,4 For example, Toyota protected itself from the losses many original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) faced in 2020 and showed improved profitability that year due to increased demand for vehicles which it was able to supply as a result of top-ranked vendor relationships.
    1 PR Newswire, 2022.
    2 Based on 10 years of data comparing Toyota and Nissan, every 1-point increase in the company’s Working Relations Index was correlated with a $15.77 net profit increase per unit. Impact on Toyota annual profits is based on 10.5 million units sold in 2021 and 2022.
    3 Interview with Renee Stanley, University of Texas at Arlington. Conducted 17 May 2023.
    4 Plante Moran, 2020.

    Supplier Trust Impacts OEM Profitability

    Sources: Macrotrends, Plante Moran 2022, Nissan 2022 and 2023, and Toyota 2022. Profit per car is based on total annual profit divided by total annual sales volume.

    Outcome-based relationships are a new paradigm

    In a new model where organizations are procuring autonomous capabilities, outcomes will govern vendor relationships.

    An outcome-based relationship requires a higher level of mutual trust than traditional vendor relationships. This requires shared reward and shared risk.

    Don’t forget about traditional vendor management relationships! Not all vendor relationships can (or should) be outcome-based.

    Managing Exponential Value Relationships.

    Case study

    INDUSTRY: Technology

    SOURCE: Press Release

    Microsoft and OpenAI partner on Azure, Teams, and Microsoft Office suite

    In January 2023, Microsoft announced a $10 billion investment in OpenAI, allowing OpenAI to continue scaling its flagship large language model, ChatGPT, and giving Microsoft first access to deploy OpenAI’s products in services like GitHub, Microsoft Office, and Microsoft Teams.

    Shared risk

    Issues with OpenAI’s platforms could have a debilitating effect on Microsoft’s own reputation – much like Google’s $100 billion stock loss following a blunder by its AI platform Bard – not to mention the financial loss if the platform does not live up to the hype.

    Shared reward

    This was a particularly important strategic move by Microsoft, as its main competitors develop their own AI models in a race to the top. This investment also gave OpenAI the resources to continue scaling and evolving its services much faster than it would be capable of on its own. If OpenAI’s products succeed, there is a significant upside for both companies.

    The image contains a graph that demonstrates time to reach 1 million users.

    Adapt your approach to vendor relationships

    Both traditional vendors and exponential relationships are important.

    Traditional

    procurement

    Vendor

    management

    Exponential vendor relationships

    • Ideal for procuring a product or service
    • Typically evaluates vendors based on their capabilities and track record of success
    • Focuses on metrics, KPIs, and contracts to deliver success to the organization purchasing the product or service
    • Vendors typically only have access to company data showing what is required to deliver their product or service
    • Ideal for managing vendors supplying products or services
    • Typically evaluates vendors based on the value and the criticality of a vendor to drive VM-resource allocation
    • External vendors do not generally participate in sharing of risks or rewards outside of payment for services or incentives/penalties
    • Vendors typically have limited access to company data
    • Ideal for procuring an autonomous capability
    • Typically evaluated based on the total possible value creation for both parties
    • External vendors share in substantial portions of the risks and rewards of the relationship
    • Vendors typically have significant access to company data, including proprietary methods, intellectual property, and customer lists

    Use this research to successfully
    manage outcome-based relationships.

    Use Info-Tech’s research to Jump Start Your Vendor Management Initiative.

    Common obstacles

    Exponential relationships require new approaches to vendor management as businesses autonomize:

    • Autonomization refers to the shift toward autonomous business capabilities which leverage technologies such as AI and quantum computing to operate independently of human interaction.
    • The speed and complexity of technology advancement requires that businesses move quickly and confidently to develop strong relationships and deliver value.
    • We are seeing businesses shift from procuring products and services to procuring autonomous business capabilities (sometimes called “as a service,” or aaS). This shift can drive exponential value but also increases complexity and risk.
    • Exponential IT requires a shift in emphasis toward more mature relationship and risk management strategies, compared to traditional vendor management.

    The shift from technology service agreements to business capability agreements needs a new approach

    Eighty-seven percent of organizations are currently experiencing talent shortages or expect to within a few years.

    Source: McKinsey, “Mind the [skills] gap”, 2021.

    Sixty-three percent of IT leaders plan to implement AI in their organizations by the end of 2023.

    Source: Info-Tech Research Group survey, 2022

    Insight summary

    Build trust

    Successfully managing exponential relationships requires increased trust and the ability to share both risks and rewards. Outcome-based vendors typically have greater access to intellectual property, customer data, and proprietary methods, which can pose a risk to the organization if this information is used to benefit competitors. Build mutual trust by sharing both risks and rewards.

    Manage risk

    Outcome-based relationships with external vendors can drastically affect an organization’s risk profile. Carefully consider third-party risk and shared risk, including ESG risk, as well as the business risk of losing control over capabilities and assets. Qualified risk specialists (such as legal, regulatory, contract, intellectual property law) should be consulted before entering outcome-based relationships.

    Drive outcomes

    Fostering strategic relationships can be instrumental in times of crisis, when being the customer of choice for key vendors can push your organization up the line from the vendor’s side – but be careful about relying on this too much. Vendor objectives may not align with yours, and in the end, everyone needs to protect themselves.

    Assess your readiness for exponential value relationships

    Key deliverable:

    Exponential Relationships Readiness Assessment

    Determine your readiness to build exponential value relationships.

    Measure the value of this blueprint

    Save thousands of dollars by leveraging this research to assess your readiness, before you lose millions from a relationship gone bad.

    Our research indicates that most organizations would take months to prepare this type of assessment without using our research. That’s over 80 person-hours spent researching and gathering data to support due diligence, for a total cost of thousands of dollars. Doesn’t your staff have better things to do?

    Start by answering a few brief questions, then return to this slide at the end to see how much your answers have changed.

    Establish Baseline Metrics

    Use Info-Tech’s research to Exponential Relationships Readiness Assessment.

    Estimated time commitment without Info-Tech’s research (person-hours)

    Establish a baseline

    Gauge the effectiveness of this research by asking yourself the following questions before and after completing your readiness assessment:

    Questions

    Before

    After

    To what extent are you satisfied with your current vendor management approach?

    How many of your current vendors would you describe as being of strategic importance?

    How much do you spend on vendors annually?

    How much value do you derive from your vendor relationships annually?

    Do you have a vendor management strategy?

    What outcomes are you looking to achieve through your vendor relationships?

    How well do you understand the core capabilities needed to drive successful vendor management?

    How well do you understand your current readiness to engage in outcome-based vendor relationships?

    Do you feel comfortable managing the risks when working with organizations to implement artificial intelligence and other autonomous capabilities?

    How to use this research

    Five tips to get the most out of your readiness assessment.

    1. Each category consists of five competencies, with a maximum of five points each. The maximum score on this assessment is 100 points.
    2. Effectiveness levels range from basic (level 1) to advanced (level 5). Level 1 is generally considered the baseline for most effectively operating organizations. If your organization is struggling with level 1 competencies, it is recommended to improve maturity in those areas before pursuing exponential relationships.
    3. This assessment is qualitative; complete the assessment to the best of your ability, based on the scoring rubric provided. If you fall between levels, use the lower one in your assessment.
    4. The scoring rubric may not perfectly fit the processes and practices within every organization. Consider the spirit of the description and score accordingly.
    5. Other industry- and region-specific competencies may be required to succeed at exponential relationships. The competencies in this assessment are a starting point, and internal validation and assessments should be conducted to uncover additional competencies and skills.

    Financial management

    Manage your budget and spending to stay on track throughout your relationship.

    “Most organizations underestimate the amount of time, money, and skill required to build and maintain a successful relationship with another organization. The investment in exponential relationships is exponential in itself – as are the returns.”

    – Jennifer Perrier, Principal Research Director,
    Info-Tech Research Group

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Executive leadership team, including CIO
    • CFO
    • Vendor management leader
    • Other internal stakeholders of vendor relationships

    Activities:

    • Assess your ability to manage scope and budget in exponential IT relationships.

    Successfully manage complex finances

    Stay on track and keep your relationship running smoothly.

    Why is this important?

    • Finance is at the core of most business – it drives decision making, acts as a constraint for innovation and optimization, and plays a key role in assessing options (such as return on investment or payback period).
    • Effectively managing finances is a critical success factor in developing strong relationships. Each organization must be able to manage their own budget and spending in order to balance the risk and reward in the relationship. Often, these risks and rewards will come in the form of profit and loss or revenue and spend.

    Build it into your practice:

    1. Ensure your financial decision-making practices are aligned with the organizational and relationship strategy. Do metrics and criteria reflect the organization’s goals?
    2. Develop strong accounting and financial analysis practices – this includes the ability to conduct financial due diligence on potential vendors.
    3. Develop consistent methodology to track and report on the desired outcomes on a regular basis.

    Build your ability to manage finances

    The five competencies needed to manage finances in exponential value relationships are:

    Budget procedures

    Financial alignment

    Adaptability

    Financial analysis

    Reporting & compliance

    Clearly articulate and communicate budgets, with proactive analysis and reporting.

    There is a strong, direct alignment between financial outcomes and organizational strategy and goals.

    Financial structures can manage many different types of relationships and structures without major overhaul.

    Proactive financial analysis is conducted regularly, with actionable insights.

    This exceeds legal requirements and includes proactive and actionable reporting.

    Relationship management

    Drive exponential value by becoming a customer of choice.

    “The more complex the business environment becomes — for instance, as new technologies emerge or as innovation cycles get faster — the more such relationships make sense. And the better companies get at managing individual relationships, the more likely it is that they will become “partners of choice” and be able to build entire portfolios of practical and value-creating partnerships.”

    (“Improving the management of complex business partnerships.” McKinsey, 2019)

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Executive leadership team, including CIO
    • Vendor management leader
    • Other internal stakeholders of vendor relationships

    Activities:

    • Assess your ability to manage relationships in exponential IT relationships.

    Take your relationships to the next level

    Maintaining positive relationships is key to building trust.

    Why is this important?

    • All relationships will experience challenges, and the ability to resolve these issues will rely heavily on the relationship management skills and soft skills of the leadership within each organization.
    • Based on a 20-year study of vendor relationships in the automotive sector, business-to-business trust is a function of reasonable demands, follow-through, and information sharing.
    (Source: Plante Moran, 2020)

    Build it into your practice:

    1. Develop the soft skills necessary to promote psychological safety, growth mindset, and strong and open communication channels.
    2. Be smart about sharing information – you don’t need to share everything, but being open about relevant information will enhance trust.
    3. Both parties need to work hard to develop trust necessary to build a true relationship. This will require increased access to decision-makers, clearly defined guardrails, and the ability for unsatisfied parties to leave.

    Build your ability to manage relationships

    The five competencies needed to manage relationships in exponential partnerships are:

    Strategic alignment

    Follow-through

    Information sharing

    Shared risk & rewards

    Communication

    Work with vendors to create roadmaps and strategies to drive mutual success.

    Ensure demands are reasonable and consistently follow through on commitments.

    Proactively and freely share relevant information between parties.

    Equitably share responsibility for outcomes and benefits from success.

    Ensure clear, proactive, and frequent communication occurs between parties.

    Performance management

    Outcomes management focuses on results, not methods.

    According to Jennifer Robinson, senior editor at Gallup, “This approach focuses people and teams on a concrete result, not the process required to achieve it. Leaders define outcomes and, along with managers, set parameters and guidelines. Employees, then, have a high degree of autonomy to use their own unique talents to reach goals their own way.” (Forbes, 2023)

    In the context of exponential relationships, vendors can be given a high degree of autonomy provided they meet their objectives.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Executive leadership team, including CIO
    • Vendor management leader
    • Other internal stakeholders of vendor relationships

    Activities:

    • Assess your ability to manage outcomes in exponential IT relationships.

    Manage outcomes to drive mutual success

    Build trust by achieving shared objectives.

    Why is this important?

    • Relationships are based on shared risk and shared reward for all parties. In order to effectively communicate the shared rewards, you must first understand and communicate your objectives for the relationship, then measure outcomes to ensure all parties are benefiting.
    • Effectively managing outcomes reduces the risk that one party will choose to leave based on a perception of benefits not being achieved. Parties may still leave the agreement, but decisions should be based on shared facts and issues should be communicated and addressed early.

    Build it into your practice:

    1. Clearly articulate what you hope to achieve by entering an outcome-based relationship. Each party should outline and agree to the goals, objectives, and desired outcomes from the relationship.
    2. Document how rewards will be shared among parties. What type of rewards are anticipated? Who will benefit and how?
    3. Develop consistent methodology to track and report on the desired outcomes on a regular basis. This might consist of a vendor scorecard or a monthly meeting.

    Build your ability to manage outcomes

    The five competencies needed to manage outcomes in exponential value relationships are:

    Goal setting

    Negotiation

    Performance tracking

    Issue
    resolution

    Scope management

    Set specific, measurable and actionable goals, and communicate them with stakeholders.

    Clearly articulate and agree upon measurable outcomes between all parties.

    Proactively track progress toward goals/outcomes and discuss results with vendors regularly.

    Openly discuss potential issues and challenges on a regular basis. Find collaborative solutions to problems.

    Proactively manage scope and discuss with vendors on a regular basis.

    Risk management

    Exponential IT means exponential risk – and exponential rewards.

    One of the key differentiators between traditional vendor relationships and exponential relationships is the degree to which risk is shared between parties. This is not possible in all industries, which may limit companies’ ability to participate in this type of exponential relationship.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Executive leadership team, including CIO
    • Vendor management leader
    • Risk management leader
    • Other internal stakeholders of vendor relationships

    Activities:

    • Assess your ability to manage risk in exponential IT relationships.

    Relationships come with a lot of hidden risks

    Successfully managing complex risks can be the difference between a spectacular success and company-ending failure.

    Why is this important?

    • Relationships inherently involve a loss of control. You are relying on another party to fulfill their part of the agreement, and you depend on the success of the outcome. Loss of control comes with significant risks.
    • Sharing in risk is what differentiates an outcome-based relationship from a traditional vendor relationship; vendors must have skin in the game.
    • Organizations must consider many different types of risk when considering a relationship with a vendor: fraud, security, human rights, labor relations, ESG, and operational risks. Remember that risk is not inherently bad; some risk is necessary.

    Build it into your practice:

    1. Build or hire the necessary risk expertise needed to properly assess and evaluate the risks of potential vendor relationships. This includes intellectual property, ESG, legal/regulatory, cybersecurity, data security, and more.
    2. Develop processes and procedures which clearly communicate and report on risk on a regular basis.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Some highly regulated industries (such as finance) are prevented from transferring certain types of risk. In these industries, it may be much more difficult to form vendor relationships.

    Don’t forget about third-party ESG risk

    Customers care about ESG. You should too.

    Protect yourself against third-party ESG risks by considering the environmental and social impacts of your vendors.

    Third-party ESG risks can include the following:

    • Environmental risk: Vendors with unsustainable practices such as carbon emissions or waste generation of natural resource depletion can negatively impact the organization’s environmental goals.
    • Social risk: Unsafe or illegal labor practices, human rights violations, and supply chain management issues can reflect negatively on organizations that choose to work with vendors who engage in such practices.
    • Governance risk: Vendors who engage in illegal or unethical behaviors, including bribery and corruption or data and privacy breaches can impact downstream customers.

    Working with vendors that have a poor record of ESG carries a very real reputational risk for organizations who do not undertake appropriate due diligence.

    A global survey of nearly 14,000 customers revealed that…

    Source: EY Future Consumer Index, 2021

    Seventy-seven percent of customers believe companies have a responsibility to manufacture sustainably.

    Sixty-eight percent of customers believe businesses should ensure their suppliers meet high social and environmental standards.

    Fifty-five percent of customers consider the environmental impact of production in their purchasing decisions.

    Build your ability to manage risk

    The five competencies needed to manage risk in exponential value relationships are:

    Third-party risk

    Value chain

    Data management

    Regulatory & compliance

    Monitoring & reporting

    Understand and assess third-party risk, including ESG risk, in potential relationships.

    Assess risk throughout the value chain for all parties and balance risk among parties.

    Proactively assess and manage potential data risks, including intellectual property and strategic data.

    Manage regulatory and compliance risks, including understanding risk transfer and ultimate risk holder.

    Proactive and open monitoring and reporting of risks, including regular communication among stakeholders.

    Contract management

    Contract management is a critical part of vendor management.

    Well-managed contracts include clearly defined pricing, performance-based outcomes, clear roles and responsibilities, and appropriate remedies for failure to meet requirements. In outcome-based relationships, contracts are generally used as a secondary method of enforcing performance, with relationship management being the primary method of addressing challenges and ensuring performance.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Executive leadership team, including CIO
    • Vendor management leader
    • Risk management leader
    • Other internal stakeholders of vendor relationships

    Activities:

    • Assess your ability to manage risk in exponential IT relationships.

    Build your ability to manage contracts

    The five competencies needed to manage contracts in exponential value relationships are:

    Pricing

    Performance outcomes

    Roles and responsibilities

    Remedies

    Payment

    Pricing is clearly defined in contracts so that the total cost is understood including all fees, optional pricing, and set caps on increases.

    Contracts are performance-based whenever possible, including deliverables, milestones, service levels, due dates, and outcomes.

    Each party's roles and responsibilities are clearly defined in the contract documents with adequate detail.

    Contracts contain appropriate remedies for a vendor's failure to meet SLAs, due dates, and other obligations.

    Payment is made after performance targets are met, approved, or accepted.

    Activity 1: Assess your readiness for exponential relationships

    1-3 hours

    1. Gather key stakeholders from across your organization to participate in the readiness assessment exercise.
    2. As a group, review the core competencies from the previous four sections and determine where your organization’s effectiveness lies for each competency. Record your responses in the Exponential Relationships Readiness Assessment tool.

    Download the Exponential Relationships Readiness Assessment tool.

    Input Output
    • Core competencies
    • Knowledge of internal processes and capabilities
    • Readiness assessment
    Materials Participants
    • Exponential
      Relationships Readiness Assessment
      tool
    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • Executive leadership team, including CIO
    • Vendor management leader
    • Other internal stakeholders of vendor relationships

    Understand your assessment

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Executive leadership team, including CIO
    • Vendor management leader
    • Other internal stakeholders of vendor relationships

    Activities:

    • Create an action plan.

    Understand the results of your assessment

    Consider the following recommendations based on your readiness assessment scores:

    • The chart to the right shows sample results. The bars indicate the recommended scores, and the line indicates the readiness score.
    • Three or more categories below the recommended scores, or any categories more than five points below the recommendation: outcome-based relationships are not recommended at this time.
    • Two or more categories below the recommended scores: Proceed with caution and limit outcome-based relationships to low-risk areas. Continue to mature capabilities.
    • One category below the recommended scores: Evaluate the risks and benefits before engaging in higher-risk vendor relationships. Continue to mature capabilities.
    • All categories at or above the recommended scores: You have many of the core capabilities needed to succeed at exponential relationships! Continue to evaluate and refine your vendor relationships strategy, and identify any additional competencies needed based on your industry or region.

    Acme Corp Exponential Relationships Readiness.

    Activity 2: Create an action plan

    1 hour

    1. Gather the stakeholders who participated in the readiness assessment exercise.
    2. As a group, review the results of the readiness assessment. Where there any surprise? Do the results reflect your understanding of the organization’s maturity?
    3. Determine which areas are likely to limit the organization’s relationship capability, based on lowest scoring areas and relative importance to the organization.
    4. Break out into groups and have each group identify three actions the organization could take to mature the lowest scoring areas.
    5. Bring the group back together and prioritize the actions. Note who will be accountable for each next step.
    InputOutput
    • Readiness assessment
    • Action plan to improve maturity of capabilities
    MaterialsParticipants
    • Exponential
      Relationship Readiness Assessment
      tool
    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • Executive leadership team, including CIO
    • Vendor management leader
    • Other internal stakeholders of vendor relationships

    Related Info-Tech Research

    Jump Start Your Vendor Management Initiative
    Create and implement a vendor management framework to begin obtaining measurable results in 90 days.

    Elevate Your Vendor Management Initiative
    Transform your VMI from tactical to strategic to maximize its impact and value

    Evaluate Your Vendor Account Team to Optimize Vendor Relations
    Understand the value of knowing your account team’s influence in the organization, and your influence, to drive results.

    Related Info-Tech Research

    Build an IT Risk Management Program
    Mitigate the IT risks that could negatively impact your organization.

    Build an IT Budget
    Effective IT budgets are more than a spreadsheet. They tell a story.

    Adopt an Exponential IT Mindset
    Thrive through the next paradigm shift..

    Author

    Kim Osborne Rodriguez

    Kim Osborne Rodriguez
    Research Director, CIO Advisory
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Kim is a professional engineer and Registered Communications Distribution Designer (RCDD) with over a decade of experience in management and engineering consulting spanning healthcare, higher education, and commercial sectors. She has worked on some of the largest hospital construction projects in Canada, from early visioning and IT strategy through to design, specifications, and construction administration. She brings a practical and evidence-based approach, with a track record of supporting successful projects.

    Kim holds a Bachelor’s degree in Honours Mechatronics Engineering and an option in Management Sciences from the University of Waterloo.

    Research Contributors and Experts

    Jack Hakimian

    Jack Hakimian
    Senior Vice President
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Jack has more than 25 years of technology and management consulting experience. He has served multibillion-dollar organizations in multiple industries including financial services and telecommunications. Jack also served several large public sector institutions.

    He is a frequent speaker and panelist at technology and innovation conferences and events and holds a Master’s degree in Computer Engineering as well as an MBA from the ESCP-EAP European School of Management.

    Michael Tweedie

    Michael Tweedie
    Practice Lead, CIO Strategy
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Mike Tweedie brings over 25 years as a technology executive. He’s led several large transformation projects across core infrastructure, application and IT services as the head of Technology at ADP Canada. He was also the Head of Engineering and Service Offerings for a large French IT services firm, focused on cloud adoption and complex ERP deployment and management.

    Mike holds a Bachelor’s degree in Architecture from Ryerson University.

    Scott Bickley

    Scott Bickley
    Practice Lead, VCCO
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Scott Bickley is a Practice Lead & Principal Research Director at Info-Tech Research Group, focused on Vendor Management and Contract Review. He also has experience in the areas of IT Asset Management (ITAM), Software Asset Management (SAM), and technology procurement along with a deep background in operations, engineering, and quality systems management.

    Scott holds a B.S. in Justice Studies from Frostburg State University. He also holds active IAITAM certification designations of CSAM and CMAM and is a Certified Scrum Master (SCM).

    Donna Bales

    Donna Bales
    Principal Research Director
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Donna Bales is a Principal Research Director in the CIO Practice at Info-Tech Research Group, specializing in research and advisory services in IT risk, governance, and compliance. She brings over 25 years of experience in strategic consulting and product development and has a history of success in leading complex, multistakeholder industry initiatives.

    Donna has a bachelor’s degree in economics from the University of Western Ontario.

    Research Contributors and Experts

    Jennifer Perrier

    Jennifer Perrier
    Principal Research Director
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Jennifer has 25 years of experience in the information technology and human resources research space, joining Info-Tech in 1998 as the first research analyst with the company. Over the years, she has served as a research analyst and research manager, as well as in a range of roles leading the development and delivery of offerings across Info-Tech’s product and service portfolio, including workshops and the launch of industry roundtables and benchmarking. She was also Research Lead for McLean & Company, the HR advisory division of Info-Tech, during its start-up years.

    Jennifer’s research expertise spans the areas of IT strategic planning, governance, policy and process management, people management, leadership, organizational change management, performance benchmarking, and cross-industry IT comparative analysis. She has produced and overseen the development of hundreds of publications across the full breadth of both the IT and HR domains in multiple industries. In 2022, Jennifer joined Info-Tech’s IT Financial Management Practice with a focus on developing financial transparency to foster meaningful dialogue between IT and its stakeholders and drive better technology investment decisions.

    Phil Bode

    Phil Bode
    Principal Research Director
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Phil has 30+ years of experience with IT procurement-related topics: contract drafting and review, negotiations, RFXs, procurement processes, and vendor management. Phil has been a frequent speaker at conferences, a contributor to magazine articles in CIO Magazine and ComputerWorld, and quoted in many other magazines. He is a co-author of the book The Art of Creating a Quality RFP.

    Phil has a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration with a double major of Finance and Entrepreneurship and a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration with a major of Accounting, both from the University of Arizona.

    Research Contributors

    Erin Morgan

    Erin Morgan
    Assistant Vice President, IT Administration
    University of Texas at Arlington

    Renee Stanley

    Renee Stanley
    Assistant Director IT Procurement and Vendor Management
    University of Texas at Arlington

    Note: Additional contributors did not wish to be identified.

    Bibliography

    Andrea, Dave. “Plante Moran’s 2022 Working Relations Index® (WRI) Study shows supplier relations can improve amid industry crisis.” Plante Moran, 25 Aug 2022. Accessed 18 May 2023.
    Andrea, Dave. “Trust between suppliers and OEMs can better prepare you for the next crisis.” Plante Moran, 9 Sept 2020. Accessed 17 May 2023.
    Cleary, Shannon, and Carolan McLarney. “Organizational Benefits of an Effective Vendor Management Strategy.” IUP Journal of Supply Chain Management, Vol. 16, Issue 4, Dec 2019.
    De Backer, Ruth, and Eileen Kelly Rinaudo. “Improving the management of complex business partnerships.” McKinsey, 21 March 2019. Accessed 9 May 2023 .
    Dennean, Kevin et al. “Let's chat about ChatGPT.” UBS, 22 Feb 2023. Accessed 26 May 2023.
    F&I Tools. “Nissan Worldwide Vehicle Sales Report.” Factory Warranty List, 2022. Accessed 18 May 2023.
    Gomez, Robin. “Adopting ChatGPT and Generative AI in Retail Customer Service.” Radial, 235, April 2023. Accessed 10 May 2023.
    Harms, Thomas and Kristina Rogers. “How collaboration can drive value for you, your partners and the planet.” EY, 26 Oct 2021. Accessed 10 May 2023.
    Hedge & Co. “Toyota, Honda finish 1-2; General Motors finishes at 3rd in annual Supplier Working Relations Study.” PR Newswire, 23 May 2022. Accessed 17 May 2023.
    Henke Jr, John W., and T. Thomas. "Lost supplier trust, lost profits." Supply Chain Management Review, May 2014. Accessed 17 May 2023.
    Information Services Group, Inc. “Global Demand for IT and Business Services Continues Upward Surge in Q2, ISG Index™ Finds.” BusinessWire, 7 July 2021. Accessed 8 May 2023.
    Kasanoff, Bruce. “New Study Reveals Costs Of Bad Supplier Relationships.” Forbes, 6 Aug 2014. Accessed 17 May 2023.
    Macrotrends. “Nissan Motor Gross Profit 2010-2022.” Macrotrends. Accessed 18 May 2023.
    Macrotrends. “Toyota Gross Profit 2010-2022.” Macrotrends. Accessed 18 May 2023.
    McKinsey. “Mind the [skills] gap.” McKinsey, 27 Jan 2021. Accessed 18 May 2023.
    Morgan, Blake. “7 Examples of How Digital Transformation Impacted Business Performance.” Forbes, 21 Jul 2019. Accessed 10 May 2023.
    Nissan Motor Corporation. “Nissan reports strong financial results for fiscal year 2022.” Nissan Global Newsroom, 11 May 2023. Accessed 18 May 2023.

    Bibliography

    “OpenAI and Microsoft extend partnership.” Open AI, 23 Jan 2023. Accessed 26 May 2023.
    Pearson, Bryan. “The Apple Of Its Aisles: How Best Buy Lured One Of The Biggest Brands.“ Forbes, 23 Apr 2015. Accessed 23 May 2023.
    Perifanis, Nikolaos-Alexandros and Fotis Kitsios. “Investigating the Influence of Artificial Intelligence on Business Value in the Digital Era of Strategy: A Literature Review.” Information, 2 Feb 2023. Accessed 10 May 2023.
    Scott, Tim and Nathan Spitse. “Third-party risk is becoming a first priority challenge.” Deloitte. Accessed 18 May 2023.
    Stanley, Renee. Interview by Kim Osborne Rodriguez, 17 May 2023.
    Statista. “Toyota's retail vehicle sales from 2017 to 2021.” Statista, 27 Jul 2022. Accessed 18 May 2023.
    Tlili, Ahmed, et al. “What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education.” Smart Learning Environments, 22 Feb 2023. Accessed 9 May 2023.
    Vitasek, Kate. “Outcome-Based Management: What It Is, Why It Matters And How To Make It Happen.” Forbes, 12 Jan 2023. Accessed 9 May 2023.

    Streamline Your Workforce During a Pandemic

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}515|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Lead
    • Parent Category Link: /lead

    Reduced infection rates in compromised areas are providing hope that these difficult times will pass. However, organizations are facing harsh realities in real time. With significant reductions in revenue, employers are facing pressure to quickly implement cost-cutting strategies, resulting in mass layoffs of valuable employees.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    Employees are an organization’s greatest asset. When faced with cost-cutting pressures, look for redeployment opportunities that use talent as a resource to get through hard times before resorting to difficult layoff decisions.

    Impact and Result

    Make the most of your workforce in this unprecedented situation by following McLean & Company’s process to initiate redeployment efforts and reduce costs. If all else fails, follow our guidance on planning for layoffs and considerations when doing so.

    Streamline Your Workforce During a Pandemic Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Meet with leadership

    Set a strategy with senior leadership, brainstorm underused and understaffed employee segments and departments, then determine an approach to redeployments and layoffs.

    • Streamline Your Workforce During a Pandemic Storyboard
    • Redeployment and Layoff Strategy Workbook

    2. Plan individual and department redeployment

    Collect key information, prepare and redeploy, and roll up information across the organization.

    • Short-Term Survival Segment Evaluation Tool
    • Skills Inventory for Redeployment Tool
    • Redeployment Action and Communication Plan
    • Crisis Communication Guide for HR
    • Crisis Communication Guide for Leaders
    • Leadership Crisis Communication Guide Template
    • 3i's of Engaging Management – Manager Guide
    • Feedback and Coaching Guide for Managers
    • Redeployment Communication Roll-up Template

    3. Plan individual and department layoffs

    Plan for layoffs, execute on the layoff plan, and communicate to employees.

    • Employee Departure Checklist Tool
    • 10 Communication Best Practices in the Face of Crisis
    • Termination Logistics Tool
    • Termination Costing Tool
    • COVID-19: Employee-Facing Frequently Asked Questions Template
    • COVID-19: Employee-Facing Frequently Asked Questions
    • Standard Internal Communications Plan

    4. Monitor and manage departmental effectiveness

    Monitor departmental performance, review organizational performance, and determine next steps.

    • HR Metrics Library
    • Standard HR Scorecard
    [infographic]

    Mandate Data Valuation Before It’s Mandated

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}121|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 8.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $25,000 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 10 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Data Management
    • Parent Category Link: /data-management
    • Data can be valuable if used properly or dangerous when mishandled.
    • The organization needs to understand the value of their data before they can establish proper data management practice.
    • Data is not considered a capital asset unless there is a financial transaction (e.g. buying or selling data assets).
    • Data valuation is not easy, and it costs money to collect, store, and maintain data.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Data always outlives people, processes, and technology. They all come and go, while data remains.
    • Oil is a limited resource, data is not. Contrary to oil, data is likely to grow over time.
    • Data is likely to outlast all other current popular financial instruments including currency, assets, or commodities.
    • Data is used internally and externally and can easily be replicated or combined.
    • Data is beyond currency, assets, or commodities and needs to be a category of its own.

    Impact and Result

    • Every organization must calculate the value of their data. This will enable organizations to become truly data-driven.
    • Too much time has been spent arguing different methods of valuation. An organization must settle on valuation that is acceptable to all its stakeholders.
    • Align data governance and data management to data valuation. Often organizations struggle to justify data initiatives due to lack of visibility in data valuation.
    • Establish appropriate roles and responsibilities and ensure alignment to a common set of goals as a foundation to get the most accurate future data valuation for your organization.
    • Assess organization data assets and implementation roadmap that considers the necessary competencies and capabilities and their dependencies in moving towards the higher maturity of data assets.

    Mandate Data Valuation Before It’s Mandated Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to understand the value associated with the organization's data. Review Info-Tech’s methodology for assessing data value and justifying your data initiatives with a value proposition.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Demystify data valuation

    Understand the benefits of data valuation.

    • Mandate Data Valuation Before It’s Mandated – Phase 1: Demystify Data Valuation

    2. Data value chain

    Learn about the data value chain framework and preview the step-by-step guide to start collecting data sources.

    • Mandate Data Valuation Before It’s Mandated – Phase 2: Data Value Chain

    3. Data value assessment

    Mature your data valuation by putting in the valuation dimensions and metrics. Establish documented results that can be leveraged to demonstrate value in your data assets.

    • Mandate Data Valuation Before It’s Mandated – Phase 3: Data Value Assessment
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Mandate Data Valuation Before It’s Mandated

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Understand the Value of Data Valuation

    The Purpose

    Explain data valuation approach and value proposition.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A clear understanding and case for data valuation.

    Activities

    1.1 Review common business data sources and how the organization will benefit from data valuation assessment.

    1.2 Understand Info-Tech’s data valuation framework.

    Outputs

    Organization data valuation priorities

    2 Capture Organization Data Value Chain

    The Purpose

    Capture data sources and data collection methods.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A clear understanding of the data value chain.

    Activities

    2.1 Assess data sources and data collection methods.

    2.2 Understand key insights and value proposition.

    2.3 Capture data value chain.

    Outputs

    Data Valuation Tool

    3 Data Valuation Framework

    The Purpose

    Leverage the data valuation framework.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Capture key data valuation dimensions and align with data value chain.

    Activities

    3.1 Introduce data valuation framework.

    3.2 Discuss key data valuation dimensions.

    3.3 Align data value dimension to data value chain.

    Outputs

    Data Valuation Tool

    4 Plan for Continuous Improvement

    The Purpose

    Improve organization’s data value.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Continue to improve data value.

    Activities

    4.1 Capture data valuation metrics.

    4.2 Define data valuation for continuous monitoring.

    4.3 Create a communication plan.

    4.4 Define a plan for continuous improvements.

    Outputs

    Data valuation metrics

    Data Valuation Communication Plan

    Advisory Call Outline: Software Selection Engagement

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}609|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Selection & Implementation
    • Parent Category Link: /selection-and-implementation
    • Selection takes forever. Traditional software selection drags on for years, sometimes in perpetuity.
    • IT is viewed as a bottleneck and the business has taken control of software selection.
    • “Gut feel” decisions rule the day. Intuition, not hard data, guides selection, leading to poor outcomes.
    • Negotiations are a losing battle. Money is left on the table by inexperienced negotiators.
    • Overall: Poor selection processes lead to wasted time, wasted effort, and applications that continually disappoint.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Adopt a formal methodology to accelerate and improve software selection results.
    • Improve business satisfaction by including the right stakeholders and delivering new applications on a truly timely basis.
    • Kill the “sacred cow” requirements that only exist because “it’s how we’ve always done it.”
    • Forget about “RFP” overload and hone in on the features that matter to your organization.
    • Skip the guesswork and validate decisions with real data.
    • Take control of vendor “dog and pony shows” with single-day, high-value, low-effort, rapid-fire investigative interviews.
    • Master vendor negotiations and never leave money on the table.

    Impact and Result

    • Improving software selection is a critical project that will deliver huge value.
    • Hit a home run with your business stakeholders: use a data-driven approach to select the right application vendor for their needs – fast.
    • Shatter stakeholder expectations with truly rapid application selections.
    • Boost collaboration and crush the broken telephone with concise and effective stakeholder meetings.
    • Lock in hard savings and do not pay list price by using data-driven tactics.

    Advisory Call Outline: Software Selection Engagement Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Advisory Call Outline

    Info-Tech's expert analyst guidance will help you save money, align stakeholders, and speed up the application selection process.

    • Advisory Call Outline: Software Selection Engagement Deck

    2. Workshop Overview

    Info-Tech's workshop will help you implement a repeatable, data-driven approach that accelerates software selection efforts.

    • Rapid Software Selection Workshop Overview
    [infographic]

    Define Requirements for Outsourcing the Service Desk

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}493|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Service Desk
    • Parent Category Link: /service-desk
    • In organizations where technical support is viewed as non-strategic, many see outsourcing as a cost-effective way to provide this support. However, outsourced projects often fall short of their goals in terms of cost savings and the quality of support. 
    • Significant administrative work and up-front costs are required to outsource the service desk, and poor planning often results in project failure and a decrease of end-user satisfaction.
    • A complete turnover of the service desk can result in lost knowledge and control over processes, and organizations without an exit strategy can struggle to bring their service desk back in house and return the confidence of end users.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Outsourcing is easy. Realizing the expected cost, quality, and focus benefits is hard. Successful outsourcing without being directly involved in service desk management is almost impossible.
    • You don’t need to standardize before you outsource, but you still need to conduct your due diligence. If you outsource without thinking about how you want the future to work, you will likely be unsatisfied with the result.
    • If cost is your only driver for outsourcing, understand that it comes at a cost. Customer service quality will likely be less, and your outsourcer may not add on frills such as Continual Improvement. Be careful that your specialists don’t end up spending more time working on incidents and service requests.

    Impact and Result

    • First decide if outsourcing is the correct step; there may be more preliminary work to do beforehand.
    • Assess requirements and make necessary adjustments before developing an outsource RFP.
    • Clearly define the project and produce an RFP to provide to vendors.
    • Plan for long-term success, not short-term gain.
    • Prepare to retain some of the higher-level service desk work.

    Define Requirements for Outsourcing the Service Desk Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Define Requirements for Outsourcing the Service Desk Deck – A step-by-step document to walk you through building a strategy for efficient service desk outsourcing.

    This storyboard will help you craft a project charter, create an RFP, and outline strategies to build a long-term relationship with the vendor.

    • Define Requirements for Outsourcing the Service Desk – Storyboard
    • Service Desk Outsourcing Requirements Database Library

    2. Service Desk Outsourcing Project Charter Template and Requirements Library – Best-of-breed templates to help you determine processes and build a strategy to outsource them.

    These templates will help you determine your service desk requirements and document your proposed service desk outsourcing strategy.

    • Service Desk Outsourcing Project Charter Template

    3. Service Desk Outsourcing RFP Template – A structured document to help you outline expectations and communicate requirements to managed service providers.

    This template will allow you to create a detailed RFP for your outsourcing agreement, document the statement of work, provide service overview, record exit conditions, and document licensing model and estimated pricing.

    • Service Desk Outsourcing RFP Template

    4. Service Desk Outsourcing Reference Interview Template and Scoring Tool – Materials to help you conduct efficient briefings and select the best vendor to fulfill your service desk requirements.

    Use the Reference Interview Template to outline a list of questions for interviewing current/previous customers of your candidate vendors. These interviews will help you with unbiased vendor scoring. The RFP Vendor Scoring Tool will help you facilitate vendor briefings with your list of questions and score candidate vendors efficiently through quantifying evaluations.

    • Service Desk Outsourcing Reference Interview Template
    • Service Desk Outsourcing RFP Scoring Tool

    Infographic

    Further reading

    Define Requirements for Outsourcing the Service Desk

    Prepare your RFP for long-term success, not short-term gains

    Define Requirements for Outsourcing the Service Desk

    Prepare your RFP for long-term success, not short-term gains

    EXECUTIVE BRIEF

    Analyst Perspective

    Outsource services with your eyes wide open.

    Cost reduction has traditionally been an incentive for outsourcing the service desk. This is especially the case for organizations that don't have minimal processes in place and those that need resources and skills to fill gaps.

    Although cost reduction is usually the main reason to outsource the service desk, in most cases service desk outsourcing increases the cost in a short run. But without a proper model, you will only outsource your problems rather than solving them. A successful outsourcing strategy follows a comprehensive plan that defines objectives, assigns accountabilities, and sets expectations for service delivery prior to vendor outreach.

    For outsourcing the service desk, you should plan ahead, work as a group, define requirements, prepare a strong RFP, and contemplate tension metrics to ensure continual improvement. As you build a project charter to outline your strategy for outsourcing your IT services, ensure you focus on better customer service instead of cost optimization. Ensure that the outsourcer can support your demands, considering your long-term achievement.

    Think about outsourcing like a marriage deed. Take into account building a good relationship before beginning the contract, ensure to include expectations in the agreement, and make it possible to exit the agreement if expectations are not satisfied or service improvement is not achieved.

    This is a picture of Mahmoud Ramin, PhD, Senior Research Analyst, Infrastructure and Operations, Info-Tech Research Group

    Mahmoud Ramin, PhD
    Senior Research Analyst
    Infrastructure and Operations
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    In organizations where technical support is viewed as non-strategic, many see outsourcing as a cost-effective way to provide this support. However, outsourcing projects often fall short of their goals in terms of cost savings and quality of support.

    Common Obstacles

    Significant administrative work and up-front costs are required to outsource the service desk, and poor planning often results in project failure and the decrease of end-user satisfaction.

    A complete turnover of the service desk can result in lost knowledge and control over processes, and organizations without an exit strategy can struggle to bring their service desk back in house and reestablish the confidence of end users.

    Info-Tech's Approach

    • First decide if outsourcing is the correct step; there may be more preliminary work to do beforehand.
    • Assess requirements and make necessary adjustments before developing an outsource RFP.
    • Clearly define the project and produce an RFP to provide to vendors.
    • Plan for long-term success, not short-term gains.
    • Prepare to retain some of the higher-level service desk work.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Outsourcing is easy. Realizing all of the expected cost, quality, and focus benefits is hard. Successful outsourcing without being directly involved in service desk management is almost impossible.

    Your challenge

    This research is designed to help organizations that need to:

    • Outsource the service desk or portions of service management to improve service delivery.
    • Improve and repatriate existing outsourcing outcomes by becoming more engaged in the management of the function. Regular reviews of performance metrics, staffing, escalation, knowledge base content, and customer satisfaction are critical.
    • Understand the impact that outsourcing would have on the service desk.
    • Understand the potential benefits that outsourcing can bring to the organization.

    This image contains a donut chart with the following information: Salaries and Benefits - 68.50%; Technology - 9.30%; Office Space and Facilities Expense - 14.90%; Travel, Training, and Office Supplies - 7.30%

    Source: HDI 2017

    About 68.5% of the service desk fund is allocated to agent salaries, while only 9.3% of the service desk fund is spent on technology. The high ratio of salaries and expenses over other expense drives organizations to outsource their service desk without taking other considerations into account.

    Info-Tech Insight

    The outsourcing contract must preserve your control, possession, and ownership of the intellectual property involved in the service desk operation. From the beginning of the process, repatriation should be viewed as a possibility and preserved as a capability.

    Your challenge

    This research helps organizations who would like to achieve these goals:

    • Determine objectives and requirements to outsource the service desk.
    • Develop a project charter and build an outsourcing strategy to efficiently define processes to reduce risk of failure.
    • Build an outsourcing RFP and conduct interviews to identify the best candidate for service delivery.
    • Build a long-term relationship with an outsourcing vendor, making sure the vendor is able to satisfy all requirements.
    • Include a continual improvement plan in the outsourcing strategy and contain the option upon service delivery dissatisfaction.

    New hires require between 10 and 80 hours of training (Forward Bpo Inc., 2019).

    A benchmark study by Zendesk from 45,000 companies reveals that timely resolution of issues and 24/7 service are the biggest factors in customer service experience.

    This image contains a bar graph with the following data: Timely issue resolution; 24/7 support; Friendly agent; Desired contact method; Not to repeat info; Proactive support; Self-serve; Call back; Rewards & freebies

    These factors push many businesses to consider service desk outsourcing to vendors that have capabilities to fulfill such requirements.

    Common obstacles

    These barriers make this challenge difficult to address for many organizations:

    • In most cases, organizations must perform significant administrative work before they can make a move. Those that fail to properly prepare impede a smooth transition, the success of the vendor, and the ability to repatriate.
    • Successful outsourcing comes from the recognition that an organization is experiencing complete turnover of its service desk staff. These organizations engage the vendor to transition knowledge and process to ensure continuity of quality.
    • IT realizes the most profound hidden costs of outsourcing when the rate of ticket escalation increases, diminishing the capacity of senior technical staff for strategic project work.

    Many organizations may not get the value they expect from outsourcing in their first year.

    Common Reasons:

    • Overall lack of due diligence in the outsourcing process
    • Unsuitable or unclear service transition plan
    • Poor service provider selection and management

    Poor transition planning results in delayed benefits and a poor relationship with your outsourcing service provider. A poor relationship with your service provider results in poor communication and knowledge transfer.

    Key components of a successful plan:

    1. Determine goals and identify requirements before developing an RFP.
    2. Finalize your outsourcing project charter and get ready for vendor evaluation.
    3. Assess and select the most appropriate provider; manage the transition and vendor relationship.

    Outsource the service desk properly, and you could see a wide range of benefits

    Service Desk Outsourcing: Ability to scale up/down; Reduce fixed costs; Refocus IT efforts on core activities; Access to up-to-date technology; Adhere to  ITSM best practices; Increased process optimization; Focus IT efforts on advanced expertise; Reframe to shift-left;

    Info-Tech Insight

    In your service desk outsourcing strategy, rethink downsizing first-level IT service staff. This can be an opportunity to reassign resources to more valuable roles, such as asset management, development or project backlog. Your current service desk staff are most likely familiar with the current technology, processes, and regulations within IT. Consider the ways to better use your existing resources before reducing headcount.

    Info-Tech's Approach

    Determine Goals

    Conduct activities in the blueprint to pinpoint your current challenges with the service desk and find out objectives to outsource customer service.

    Define Requirements

    You need to be clear about the processes that will be outsourced. Considering your objectives, we'll help you discover the processes to outsource, to help you achieve your goals.

    Develop RFP

    Your expectations should be documented in a formal proposal to help vendors provide solid information about how they will satisfy your requirements and what their plan is.

    Build Long-Term Relationship

    Make sure to plan for continual improvement by setting expectations, tracking the services with proper metrics, and using efficient communication with the provider. Think about the rainy day and include exit conditions for ending the relationship if needed.

    Info-Tech's methodology

    1. Define the Goal

    2. Design an Outsourcing Strategy

    3. Develop an RFP and Make a Long-Term Relationship

    Phase Steps

    1.1 Identify goals and objectives

    1.2 Assess outsourcing feasibility

    2.1 Identify project stakeholders

    2.2 Outline potential risks and constraints

    3.1 Prepare service overview and responsibility matrix

    3.2 Define approach to vendor relationship management

    3.3 Manage the outsource relationship

    Phase Outcomes

    Service Desk Outsourcing Vision and Goals

    Service Desk Processes to Outsource

    Outsourcing Roles and Responsibilities

    Outsourcing Risks and Constraints

    Service Desk Outsourcing Project Charter

    Service Desk Outsourcing RFP

    Continual Improvement Plan

    Exit Strategy

    This is an image of the strategy which you will use to build your requirements for outsourcing the service desk.  it includes: 1. Define the Goal; 2. Design an Outsourcing Strategy; 3. Develop RFP and long-term relationship.

    Insight summary

    Focus on value

    Outsourcing is easy. Realizing all of the expected cost, quality, and focus benefits is hard. Successful outsourcing without being directly involved in service desk management is almost impossible.

    Define outsourcing requirements

    You don't need to standardize before you outsource, but you still need to conduct your due diligence. If you outsource without thinking about how you want the future to work, you will likely be unsatisfied with the result.

    Don't focus on cost

    If cost is your only driver for outsourcing, understand that there will be other challenges. Customer service quality will likely be less, and your outsourcer may not add on frills such as Continual Improvement. Be careful that your specialists don't end up spending more time working on incidents and service requests.

    Emphasize on customer service

    A bad outsourcer relationship will result in low business satisfaction with IT overall. The service desk is the face of IT, and if users are dissatisfied with the service desk, then they are much likelier to be dissatisfied with IT overall.

    Vendors are not magicians

    They have standards in place to help them succeed. Determine ITSM best practices, define your requirements, and adjust process workflows accordingly. Your staff and end users will have a much easier transition once outsourcing proceeds.

    Plan ahead to guarantee success

    Identify outsourcing goals, plan for service and system integrations, document standard incidents and requests, and track tension metrics to make sure the vendor does the work efficiently. Aim for building a long-term relationship but contemplate potential exit strategy.

    Blueprint deliverables

    Each step of this blueprint is accompanied by supporting deliverables to help you accomplish your goals:

    This is a screenshot from the Service Desk Outsourcing Requirements Database Library

    Service Desk Outsourcing Requirements Database Library

    Use this library to guide you through processes to outsource

    This is a screenshot from the Service Desk Outsourcing RFP Template

    Service Desk Outsourcing RFP Template

    Use this template to craft a proposal for outsourcing your service desk

    This is a screenshot from the Service Desk Outsourcing Reference Interview Template

    Service Desk Outsourcing Reference Interview Template

    Use this template to verify vendor claims on service delivery with pervious or current customers

    This is a screenshot from the Service Desk Outsourcing Vendor Proposal Scoring Tool

    Service Desk Outsourcing Vendor Proposal Scoring Tool

    Use this tool to evaluate RFP submissions

    Key deliverable:

    This is a screenshot from the key deliverable, Service Desk Outsourcing Project Charter

    Service Desk Outsourcing Project Charter

    Document your project scope and outsourcing strategy in this template to organize the project for efficient resource and requirement allocation

    Blueprint benefits

    IT Benefits

    Business Benefits

    • Determine current challenges with the service desk and identify services to outsource.
    • Make the project charter for an efficient outsourcing strategy that will lead to higher satisfaction from IT.
    • Select the best outsource vendor that will satisfy most of the identified requirements.
    • Reduce the risk of project failure with efficient planning.
    • Understand potential feasibility of service desk outsourcing and its possible impact on business satisfaction.
    • Improve end-user satisfaction through a better service delivery.
    • Conduct more efficient resource allocation with outsourcing customer service.
    • Develop a long-term relationship between the enterprise and vendor through a continual improvement plan.

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    "Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful."

    Guided Implementation

    "Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track."

    Workshop

    "We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place."

    Consulting

    "Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project."

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

    Guided Implementation

    What does a typical GI on this topic look like?

    Phase 1Phase 2Phase 3

    Call #1: Scope your specific challenges and objectives

    Call #3: Identify project stakeholders, and potential risks and constraints

    Call #5: Create a detailed RFP

    Call #6: Identify strategy risks.

    Call #2: Assess outsourcing feasibility and processes to outsourceCall #4: Create a list of metrics to ensure efficient reporting

    Call #7: Prepare for vendor briefing and scoring each vendor

    Call #8: Build a communication plan

    A Guided Implementation (GI) is series of calls with an Info-Tech analyst to help implement our best practices in your organization.

    A typical GI is between 8 to 10 calls over the course of 4 to 6 months.

    Phase 1

    Define the goal

    Define the goal

    Design an outsourcing strategy

    Develop an RFP and make a long-term relationship

    1.1 Identify goals and objectives

    1.2 Assess outsourcing feasibility

    2.1 Identify project stakeholders

    2.2 Outline potential risks and constraints

    3.1 Prepare a service overview and responsibility matrix

    3.2 Define your approach to vendor relationship management

    3.3 Manage the outsource relationship

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Analysis outsourcing objectives
    • Assess outsourcing feasibility
    • Identify services and processes to outsource

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • Service Desk Team
    • IT Leadership

    Define requirements for outsourcing service desk support

    Step 1.1

    Identify goals and objectives

    Activities

    1.1.1 Find out why you want to outsource your service desk

    1.1.2 Document the benefits of outsourcing your service desk

    1.1.3 Identify your outsourcing vision and goals

    1.1.4 Prioritize service desk outsourcing goals to help structure your mission statement

    1.1.5 Craft a mission statement that demonstrates your decision to reach your outsourcing objectives

    Define the goal

    This step requires the following inputs:

    • List of strengths and weaknesses of the service desk
    • Challenges with the service desk

    This step involves the following participants:

    • CIO
    • IT Leadership
    • Service Desk Manager
    • IT Managers

    Outcomes of this step

    • Service desk outsourcing vision and goals
    • Benefits of outsourcing the service desk
    • Mission statement

    What is your rationale to outsource the service desk?

    Potential benefits of outsourcing the service desk:

    • Bring in the expertise and knowledge to manage tickets according to best-practice guidelines
    • Reduce the timeline to response and resolution
    • Improve IT productivity
    • Enhance IT services and improve performance
    • Augment relationship between IT and business through service-level improvement
    • Free up the internal team and focus IT on complex projects and higher priority tasks
    • Speed up service desk optimization
    • Improve end-user satisfaction through efficient IT services
    • Reduce impact of incidents through effective incident management
    • Increase service consistency via turnover reduction
    • Expand coverage hour and access points
    • Expand languages to service different geographical areas

    1.1.1 Find out why you want to outsource your service desk

    1 hour

    Service desk is the face of IT. Service desk improvement increases IT efficiency, lowers operation costs, and enhances business satisfaction.

    Common challenges that result in deciding to outsource the service desk are:

    Participants: IT Director, Service Desk Manager, Service Desk Team

    ChallengeExample
    Lack of tier 1 supportStartup does not have a dedicated service desk to handle incidents and provide services to end users.
    Inefficient ticket handlingMTTR is very high and end users are frustrated with their issues not getting solved quickly. Even if they call service desk, they are put on hold for a long time. Due to these inefficiencies, their daily work is greatly impacted.
    Restricted service hoursCompany headquartered in Texas does not have resources to provide 24/7 IT service. When users in the East Asia branch have a laptop issue, they must wait until the next day to get response from IT. This has diminished their satisfaction.
    Restricted languagesCompany X is headquartered in New York. An end user not fluent in English from Madrid calls in for support. It takes five minutes for the agent to understand the issue and log a ticket.
    Ticket backlogIT is in firefighting mode, very busy with taking care of critical incidents and requests from upper management. Almost no one is committed to the SLA because of their limited availability.

    Brainstorm your challenges with the service desk. Why have you decided to outsource your service desk? Use the above table as a sample.

    1.1.2 Document benefits of outsourcing your service desk

    1 hour

    1. Review the challenges with your current service desk identified in activity 1.1.1.
    2. Discuss possible ways to tackle these challenges. Be specific and determine ways to resolve these issues if you were to do it internally.
    3. Determine potential benefits of outsourcing the service desk to IT, business, and end users.
    4. For each benefit, describe dependencies. For instance, to reduce the number of direct calls (benefit), users should have access to service desk as a single point of contact (dependency).
    5. Document this activity in the Service Desk Outsourcing Project Charter Template.

    Download the Project Charter Template

    Input

    • List of challenges with the current service desk from activity 1.1.1

    Output

    • Benefits of outsourcing the service desk

    Materials

    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • Markers
    • Sticky notes
    • Laptops

    Participants

    • IT Director/CIO
    • Service Desk Manager
    • Service Desk Team
    • IT Managers

    Why should you not consider cost reduction as a primary incentive to outsourcing the service desk?

    Assume that some of the costs will not go away with outsourcing

    When you outsource, the vendor's staff tend to gradually become less effective as:

    • They are managed by metrics to reduce costs by escalating sooner, reducing talk time, and proposing questionable solutions.
    • Turnover results in new employees that get insufficient training.

    You must actively manage the vendor to identify and resolve these issues. Many organizations find that service desk management takes more time after they outsource.

    You need to keep spending on service desk management, and you may not get away from technology infrastructure spending.

    Info-Tech Insight

    In their first year, almost 42% of Info-Tech's clients do not get the real value of outsourcing services as expected. This iss primarily because of misalignment of organizational goals with outcomes of the outsourced services.

    Consider the hidden costs of outsourcing

    Expected Costs

    Unexpected Costs

    Example

    Transition CostsSeverance and staff retention
    • Cost to adapt to vendor standards
    • Training cost of vendor staff
    • Lost productivity
    • Format for requirements
    • Training report developers to work with vendor systems
    FeesPrice of the engagement
    • Extra fees for additional services
    • Extra charges for uploading data to cloud storage
    • Portal access
    Management CostsTime directing account
    • Time directly managing vendor staff
    • Checking deliverables for errors
    • Disputing penalty amounts
    Rework CostsDowntime, defect rate, etc. (quality metrics measured in SLAs)
    • Time spent adapting deliverables for unanticipated requirements
    • Time spent assuring the quality and usefulness of deliverables
    • Completing quality assurance and updating knowledgebase articles
    • Adapting reporting for presentation to stakeholders

    Determine strategies to avoid each hidden cost

    Costs related to transitioning into the engagementAdapting to standards and training costs

    Adapting to standards: Define the process improvements you will need to work with each potential vendor.

    Training costs for vendor staff: Reduce training costs by keeping the same vendor staff on all of your projects.

    Fee-related costs

    Fees for additional services (that you thought were included)

    Carefully review each proposed statement of work to identify and reduce extra fees. Understand why extra fees occur in the SLA, the contract, and the proposed statement of work, and take steps to protect yourself and the vendor.

    Management-related costs

    Direct management of vendor staff and dispute resolution

    Direct management of vendor staff: Avoid excessive management costs by defining a two-tier management structure on both sides of the engagement.

    Time spent resolving disputes: Avoid prolonged resolution costs by defining terms of divorce for the engagement up front.

    Rework costs

    Unanticipated requirements and integration with existing systems

    Unanticipated requirements: Use a two-stage process to define requirements, starting with business people and then with review by technical staff.

    Integration with existing systems: Obtain a commitment from vendors that deliverables will conform to standards at points of integration with your systems.

    Your outsourcing strategy should address the reasons you decided to outsource

    A clear vision of strategic objectives prior to entering an outsourcing agreement will allow you to clearly communicate these objectives to the Managed Service Provider (MSP) and use them as a contracted basis for the relationship.

    • Define the business' overall approach to outsourcing along with the priorities, rules, and principles that will drive the outsourcing strategy and every subsequent outsourcing decision and activity.
    • Define specific business, service, and technical goals for the outsourcing project and relevant measures of success.

    "People often don't have a clear direction around what they're trying to accomplish. The strategic goals should be documented. Is this a cost-savings exercise? Is it because you're deficient in one area? Is it because you don't have the tools or expertise to run the service desk yourself? Figure out what problem you're trying to solve by outsourcing, then build your strategy around that.
    – Jeremy Gagne, Application Support Delivery Manager, Allegis Group

    Most organizations are driven to consider outsourcing their service desk hoping to improve the following:

    • Ability to scale (train people and acquire skills)
    • Focus on core competencies
    • Decrease capital costs
    • Access latest technology without large investment
    • Resolve labor force constraints
    • Gain access to special expertise without paying a full salary
    • Save money overall

    Info-Tech Insight

    Use your goals and objectives as a management tool. Clearly outline your desired project outcomes to both your in-house team and the vendor during implementation and monitoring. It will allow a common ground to unite both parties as the project progresses.

    Mitigate pitfalls that lay in the way of desired outcomes of outsourcing

    Desired outcomePitfalls to overcome
    IT can focus on core competencies and strategic initiatives rather than break-fix tasks.Escalation to second- and third-level support usually increases when the first level has been outsourced. Outsourcers will have less experience with your typical incidents and will give up on trying to solve some issues more quickly than your internal level-one staff.
    Low outsourcing costs compared to the costs needed to employ internal employees in the same role. Due to lack of incentive to decrease ticket volume, costs are likely to increase. As a result, organizations often find themselves paying more overall for an outsourced service desk than if they had a few dedicated IT service desk employees in-house.
    Improved employee morale as a result of being able to focus on more interesting tasks.Management often expects existing employee morale to increase as a result of shifting their focus to core and strategic tasks, but the fear of diminished job security often spreads to the remaining non-level-one employees.

    1.1.3 Identify outsourcing vision and goals

    Identify the goals and objectives of outsourcing to inform your strategy.

    Participants: IT Director, Service Desk Manager, Service Desk Team

    1-2 hours

    1. Meet with key business stakeholders and the service desk staff who were involved in the decision to outsource.
    2. As a group, review the results from activity 1.1.1 (challenges with current service desk operations) and identify the goals and objectives of the outsourcing initiative.
    3. Determine the key performance indicator (KPI) for each goal.
    4. Identify the impacted stakeholder/s for each goal.
    5. Discuss checkpoint schedule for each goal to make sure the list stays updated.

    Use the sample table as a starting point:

    1. Document your table in the Service Desk Outsourcing Project Charter Template.
    IDGoal DescriptionKPIImpacted StakeholdersCheckpoint Schedule
    1Provide capacity to take calls outside of current service desk work hours
    • Decreased in time to response
    • Decreased time to resolve
    • IT Entire organization
    • Every month
    2Take calls in different languages
    • Improved service delivery in different geographical regions
    • Improved end-user satisfaction
    • End users
    • Every month
    3Provide field support at remote sites with no IT presence without having to fly out an employee
    • 40% faster incident resolution and request fulfillment
    • Entire organization
    • Every month
    4Improve ease of management by vendor helping with managing and optimizing service desk tasks
    • Improved service management efficiency
    • Entire organization
    • Every 3 months

    Download the Project Charter Template

    Evaluate organizational demographics to assess outsourcing rationale

    The size, complexity, and maturity of your organization are good indicators of service desk direction with regards to outsourcing.

    Organization Size

    • As more devices, applications, systems, and users are added to the mix, vendor costs will increase but their ability to meet business needs will decrease.
    • Small organizations are often either rejected by vendors for being too small or locked into a contract that is overkill for their actual needs (and budget).

    Complexity

    • Highly customized environments and organizations with specialized applications or stringent regulatory requirements are very difficult to outsource for a reasonable cost and acceptable quality.
    • In these cases, the vendor is required to train skilled support or ends up escalating more tickets back to second- and third-level support.

    Requirements

    • Organizations looking to outsource must have defined outsourcing requirements before looking at vendors.
    • Without a requirement assessment, the vendor won't have guidelines to follow and you won't be able to measure their adherence.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Although less adherence to service desk best practices can be one of the main incentives to outsourcing the service desk, IT should have minimal processes in place to be able to set expectations with targeting vendors.

    1.1.4 Prioritize service desk outsourcing goals to help structure mission statement

    0.5-1 hour

    The evaluation process for outsourcing the service desk should be done very carefully. Project leaders should make sure they won't panic internal resources and impact their performance through the transition period.

    If the outsourcing process is rushed, it will result in poor evaluation, inefficient decision making, and project failure.

    1. Refer to results in activity 1.1.3. Discuss the service desk outsourcing goals once again.
    2. Brainstorm the most important objectives. Use sticky notes to prioritize the items from the most important to the least important.
    3. Edit the order accordingly.

    Input

    • Project goals from activity 1.1.3

    Output

    • Prioritized list of outsourcing goals

    Materials

    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • Markers
    • Sticky notes
    • Laptops

    Participants

    • IT Director/CIO
    • Service Desk Manager
    • Service Desk Team
    • IT Managers

    Download the Project Charter Template

    1.1.5 Craft a mission statement that demonstrates your decision to reach outsourcing objectives

    Participants: IT Director, Service Desk Manager

    0.5-1 hour

    The IT mission statement specifies the function's purpose or reason for being. The mission should guide each day's activities and decisions. The mission statement should use simple and concise terminology and speak loudly and clearly, generating enthusiasm for the organization.

    Strong IT mission statements:

    • Articulate the IT function's purpose and reason for existence
    • Describe what the IT function does to achieve its vision
    • Define the customers of the IT function
    • Can be described as:
      • Compelling
      • Easy to grasp
      • Sharply focused
      • Inspirational
      • Memorable
      • Concise

    Sample mission statements:

    • To help fulfill organizational goals, IT has decided to empower business stakeholders with outsourcing the service desk.
    • To support efficient IT service provision, better collaboration, and effective communication, [Company Name] has decided to outsource the service desk.
    • [Company Name] plans to outsource the service desk so it can identify bottlenecks and inefficiencies with current service desk processes and enable [Company Name] to innovate and support business growth.
    • Considering the goals and benefits determined in the previous activities, outline a mission statement.
    • Document your outsourcing mission statement in the "Project Overview" section of the Project Charter Template.

    Download the Project Charter Template

    Step 1.2

    Assess outsourcing feasibility

    Activities

    1.2.1 Create a baseline of customer experience

    1.2.2 Identify service desk processes to outsource

    1.2.3 Design an outsourcing decision matrix for service desk processes and services

    1.2.4 Discuss if you need to outsource only service desk or if additional services would benefit from outsourcing too

    Define the goal

    This step requires the following inputs:

    • List of service desk tasks and responsibilities

    This step involves the following participants:

    • CIO
    • IT Leadership
    • Service Desk Manager
    • Infrastructure Manager

    Outcomes of this step

    • End-user satisfaction with the service desk
    • List of processes and services to outsource

    1.2.1 Create a baseline of customer experience

    Solicit targeted department feedback on IT's core service capabilities, communications, and business enablement from end users. Use this feedback to assess end-user satisfaction with each service, broken down by department and seniority level.

    1. Complete an end-user satisfaction survey to define the current state of your IT services, including service desk (timeliness and effectiveness). With Info-Tech's end-user satisfaction program, an analyst will help you set up the diagnostic and will go through the report with you.
    2. Evaluate survey results.
    3. Communicate survey results with team leads and discuss the satisfaction rates and comments of the end users.
    4. Schedule to launch another survey one year after outsourcing the service desk.
    5. Your results will be compared to the following year's results to analyze the overall success/failure of your outsourcing project.

    A decrease of business and end-user satisfaction is a big drive to outsourcing the service desk. Conduct a customer service survey to discover your end-user experience prior to and after outsourcing the service desk.

    Don't get caught believing common misconceptions: outsourcing doesn't mean sending away all the work

    First-time outsourcers often assume they are transferring most of the operations over to the vendor, but this is often not the case.

    1. Management of performance, SLAs, and customer satisfaction remain the responsibility of your organization.
    2. Service desk outsource vendors provide first-line response. This includes answering the phones, troubleshooting simple problems, and redirecting requests that are more complex.
    3. The vendor is often able to provide specialized support for standard applications (and for customized applications if you'll pay for it). However, the desktop support still needs someone onsite, and that service is very expensive to outsource.
    4. Tickets that are focused on custom applications and require specialized or advanced support are escalated back to your organization's second- and third-level support teams.

    Switching to a vendor won't necessarily improve your service desk maturity

    You should have minimal requirements before moving.

    Whether managing in-house or outsourcing, it is your job to ensure core issues have been clarified, processes defined, and standards maintained. If your processes are ad-hoc or non-existent right now, outsourcing won't fix them.

    You must have the following in place before looking to outsource:

    • Defined reporting needs and plans
    • Formalized skill-set requirements
    • Problem management and escalation guidelines
    • Ticket templates and classification rules
    • Workflow details
    • Knowledge base standards

    Info-Tech Insight

    If you expect your problems to disappear with outsourcing, they might just get worse.

    Define long-term requirements

    Anticipate growth throughout the lifecycle of your outsourcing contract and build that into the RFP

    • Most outsourcing agreements typically last three to five years. In that time, you risk outgrowing your service provider by neglecting to define your long-term service desk requirements.
    • Outgrowing your vendor before your contract ends can be expensive due to high switching costs. Managing multiple vendors can also be problematic.
    • It is crucial to define your service desk requirements before developing a request for proposal to make sure the service you select can meet your organization's needs.
    • Make sure that the business is involved in this planning stage, as the goals of IT need to scale with the growth strategy of the business. You may select a vendor with no additional capacity despite the fact that your organization has a major expansion planned to begin two years from now. Assessing future requirements also allows you to culture match with the vendor. If your outlooks and practices are similar, the match will likely click.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Don't select a vendor for what your company is today – select a vendor for what your company will be years from now. Define your future service desk requirements in addition to your current requirements and leave room for growth and development.

    You can't outsource everything

    Manage the things that stay in-house well or suffer the consequences.

    "You can't outsource management; you can only outsource supervision." Barry Cousins, Practice Lead, Info-Tech Research Group

    What can be the vendor in charge of?

    What stays in-house?

    • Call and email answering
    • Ongoing daily ticket creation and tracking
    • Tier 1 support
    • Internal escalation to Level 2 support
    • External escalation to specialized Level 2 and Level 3 support
    • Knowledge base article creation
    • Service desk-related hardware acquisition and maintenance
    • Service desk software acquisition and maintenance
    • Security and access management
    • Disaster recovery
    • Staff acquisition
    • Facilities
    • The role of the Service Desk Manager
    • Skills and training standards
    • Document standardization
    • Knowledge base quality assurance and documentation standardization
    • Self-service maintenance, promotion, and ownership
    • Short and long-term tracking of vendor performance

    Info-Tech Insight

    The need for a Service Desk Manager does not go away when you outsource. In fact, the need becomes even stronger and never diminishes.

    Assess current service desk processes before outsourcing

    Process standards with areas such as documentation, workflow, and ticket escalation should be in place before the decision to outsource has been made.

    Every effective service desk has a clear definition of the services that they are performing for the end user. You can't provide a service without knowing what the services are.

    MSPs typically have their own set of standards and processes in play. If your service desk is not at a similar level of maturity, outsourcing will not be pleasant.

    Make sure that your metrics are reported consistently and that they tell a story.

    "Establish baseline before outsourcing. Those organizations that don't have enough service desk maturity before outsourcing should work with the outsourcer to establish the baseline."
    – Yev Khobrenkov, Enterprise Consultant, Solvera Solutions

    Info-Tech Insight

    Outsourcing vendors are not service desk builders; they're service desk refiners. Switching to a vendor won't improve your maturity; you must have a certain degree of process maturity and standardization before moving.

    Case Study

    INDUSTRY: Cleaning Supplies

    SOURCE: PicNet

    Challenge

    • Reckitt Benckiser of Australia determined that its core service desk needed to be outsourced.
    • It would retain its higher level service desk staff to work on strategic projects.
    • The MSP needed to fulfill key requirements outlined by Reckitt Benckiser.

    Solution

    • Reckitt Benckiser recognized that its rapidly evolving IT needs required a service desk that could fulfill the following tasks:
    • Free up internal IT staff.
    • Provide in-depth understanding of business apps.
    • Offer efficient, cost-effective support onsite.
    • Focus on continual service improvement (CSI).

    Results

    • An RFP was developed to support the outsourcing strategy.
    • With the project structure outlined and the requirements of the vendor for the business identified, Reckitt Benckiser could now focus on selecting a vendor that met its needs.

    1.2.1 Identify service desk processes to outsource

    2-3 hours

    Review your prioritized project goals from activity 1.1.4.

    Brainstorm requirements and use cases for each goal and describe each use case. For example: To improve service desk timeliness, IT should improve incident management, to resolve incidents according to the defined SLA and based on ticket priority levels.

    Discuss if you're outsourcing just incident management or both incident management and request fulfillment. If both, determine what level of service requests will be outsourced? Will you ask the vendor to provide a service catalog? Will you outsource self-serve and automation?

    Document your findings in the service desk outsourcing requirements database library.

    Input

    • Outsourcing project goals from activity 1.1.4

    Output

    • List of processes to outsource

    Materials

    • Sticky notes
    • Markers
    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • Laptops

    Participants

    • IT Director/CIO
    • Service Desk Manager
    • Service Desk Team

    Download the Requirements Database Library

    1.2.2 Design an outsourcing decision matrix for service desk processes and services

    Participants: IT Director, Service Desk Manager, Infrastructure manager

    2-3 hours

    Most successful service desk outsourcing engagements have a primary goal of freeing up their internal resources to work on complex tasks and projects. The key outsourcing success factor is to find out internal services and processes that are standardized or should be standardized, and then determine if they can be outsourced.

    1. Review the list of identified service desk processes from activity 1.2.1.
    2. Discuss the maturity level of each process (low, medium, high) and document under the maturity column of the Outsource the Service Desk Requirements Database Library.
    3. Use the following decision matrix for each process. Discuss which tasks are important to strategic objectives, which ones provide competitive advantage, and which ones require specialized in-house knowledge.
    4. Identify processes that receive high vendor's performance advantage. For instance, access to talent, lower cost at scale, and access to technology.
    5. In your outsourcing assessment, consider a narrow scope of engagement and a broad view of what is important to business outcome.
    6. Based on your findings, determine the priority of each process to be outsourced. Document results in the service desk outsourcing requirements database library, and section 4.1 of the service desk outsourcing project charter.
    • Important to strategic objectives
    • Provides competitive advantage
    • Specialized in-house knowledge required

    This is an image of a quadrant analysis, where the X axis is labeled Vendor's Performance Advantage, and the Y axis is labeled Importance to Business Outcomes.

    • Talent/access to skills
    • Economies of scale/lower cost at scale
    • Access to technology

    Download the Requirements Database Library

    Download the Project Charter Template

    Maintain staff and training: you need to know who is being hired, how, and why

    Define documentation rules to retain knowledge

    • Establish a standard knowledge article template and list of required information.
    • Train staff on the requirements of knowledge base creation and management. Help them understand the value of the time spent recording their work.
    • It is your responsibility to assure the quality of each knowledge article. Outline accountabilities for internal staff and track for performance evaluations.

    For information on better knowledge management, refer to Info-Tech's blueprint Optimize the Service Desk With a Shift-Left Strategy.

    Expect to manage stringent skills and training standards

    • Plan on being more formal about a Service Manager position and spending more time than you allocated previously.
    • Complete a thorough assessment of the skills you need to keep the service desk running smoothly.
    • Don't forget to account for any customized or proprietary systems. How will you train vendor staff to accommodate your needs? What does their turnaround look like: would it be more likely that you acquire a dependable employee in-house?
    • Staffing requirements need to be actively monitored to ensure the outsourcer doesn't have degradation of quality or hiring standards. Don't assume that things run well – complete regular checks and ask for access to audit results.
    • Are the systems and data being accessed by the vendor highly sensitive or subject to regulatory requirements? If so, it is your job to ensure that vendor staff are being screened appropriately.

    Does your service desk need to integrate to other IT services?

    A common challenge when outsourcing multiple services to more than one vendor is a lack of collaboration and communication between vendors.

    • Leverage SIAM capabilities to integrate service desk tasks to other IT services, if needed.
    • "Service Integration and Management (SIAM) is a management methodology that can be applied in an environment that includes services sourced from a number of service providers" (Scopism Limited, 2020).
    • SIAM supports cross-functional integrations. Organizations that look for a single provider will be less likely to get maximum benefits from SIAM.

    There are three layers of entities in SIAM:

    • Customer Organization: The customer who receives services, who defines the relationship with service providers.
    • Service Integrator: End-to-end service governance and integration is done at this layer, making sure all service providers are committed to their services.
    • Service Provider: Responsible party for service delivery according to contract. It can be combination of internal provider, managed by internal agreements, and external provider, managed by SLAs between providers and customer organization.

    Use SIAM to obtain better results from multiple service providers

    In the SIAM model, the customer organization keeps strategic, governance, and business activities, while integrating other services (either internally or externally).

    This is an image of the SIAM model

    SIAM Layers. Source: SIAM Foundation BoK

    Utilize SIAM to obtain better results from multiple service providers

    SIAM reduces service duplication and improves service delivery via managing internal and external service providers.

    To utilize the SIAM model, determine the following components:

    • Service providers
    • Service consumers
    • Service outcomes
    • Service obstacles and boundaries
    • Service dependencies
    • Technical requirements and interactions for each service
    • Service data and information including service levels

    To learn more about adopting SIAM, visit Scopism.

    1.2.3 Discuss if you need to outsource only service desk or if additional services would benefit from outsourcing too

    1-2 hours

    • Discuss principles and goals of SIAM and how integrating other services can apply within your processes.
    • Review the list of service desk processes and tasks to be outsourced from activities 1.2.1 and 1.2.2.
    • Brainstorm a list of other services that are outsourced/need to be outsourced.
    • Determine providers of each service (both internal and external). Document the other services to be integrated in the project charter template and requirements database library.

    Input

    • SIAM objectives
    • List of service desk processes to outsource

    Output

    • List of other services to outsource and integrate in the project

    Materials

    • Sticky notes
    • Markers
    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • Laptops

    Participants

    • IT Director/CIO
    • Service Desk Manager
    • Service Desk Team

    Download the Requirements Database Library

    Download the Project Charter Template

    Establish requirements for problem management in the outsourcing plan

    Your MSP should not just fulfill SLAs – they should be a proactive source of value.

    Problem management is a group effort. Make sure your internal team is assisted with sufficient and efficient data by the outsourcer to conduct a better problem management.

    Clearly state your organization's expectations for enabling problem management. MSPs may not necessarily need, and cannot do, problem management; however, they should provide metrics to help you discover trends, define recurring issues, and enable root cause analysis.

    For more information on problem management, refer to Info-Tech's blueprint Improve Incident and Problem Management.

    PROBLEM MANAGEMENT

    INCIDENT MANAGEMENT

    INTAKE: Ticket data from incident management is needed for incident matching to identify problems. Critical Incidents are also a main input to problem management.

    EVENT MANAGEMENT

    INTAKE: SMEs and operations teams monitoring system health events can identify indicators of potential future issues before they become incidents.

    APPLICATION, INFRASTRUCTURE, and SECURITY TEAMS

    ACTION: Problem tickets require investigation from relevant SMEs across different IT teams to identify potential solutions or workarounds.

    CHANGE MANAGEMENT

    OUTPUT: Problem resolution may need to go through Change Management for proper authorization and risk management.

    Outline problem management protocols to gain value from your service provider

    • For example, with a deep dive into ticket trend analysis, your MSP should be able to tell you that you've had a large number of tickets on a particular issue in the past month, allowing you to look into means to resolve the issue and prevent it from reoccurring.
    • A proactive MSP should be able to help your service levels improve over time. This should be built into the KPIs and metrics you ask for from the outsourcer.

    Sample Scenario

    Your MSP tracks ticket volume by platform.

    There are 100 network tickets/month, 200 systems tickets/month, and 5,000 end-user tickets/month.

    Tracking these numbers is a good start, but the real value is in the analysis. Why are there 5,000 end-user tickets? What are the trends?

    Your MSP should be providing a monthly root-cause analysis to help improve service quality.

    Outcomes:

    1. Meeting basic SLAs tells a small part of the story. The MSP is performing well in a functional sense, but this doesn't shed any insight on what kind of knowledge or value is being added.
    2. The MSP should provide routine updates on ticket trends and other insights gained through data analysis.
    3. A commitment to continual improvement will provide your organization with value throughout the duration of the outsourcing agreement.

    Phase 2

    Design an Outsourcing Strategy

    Define the goal

    Design an outsourcing strategy

    Develop an RFP and make a long-term relationship

    1.1 Identify goals and objectives

    1.2 Assess outsourcing feasibility

    2.1 Identify project stakeholders

    2.2 Outline potential risks and constraints

    3.1 Prepare a service overview and responsibility matrix

    3.2 Define your approach to vendor relationship management

    3.3 Manage the outsource relationship

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Identify roles and responsibilities
    • Determine potential risks of outsourcing the service desk
    • Build a list of metrics

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • Service Desk Team
    • IT Leadership

    Define requirements for outsourcing service desk support

    Step 2.1

    Identify project stakeholders

    Activity

    2.1.1 Identify internal outsourcing roles and responsibilities

    Design an Outsourcing Strategy

    This step requires the following inputs:

    • List of service desk roles
    • Service desk outsourcing goals

    This step involves the following participants:

    • IT Managers
    • Project Team
    • Service Desk Manager

    Outcome of this step

    • Outsourcing roles and responsibilities

    Design an outsourcing strategy to capture the vision of your service desk

    An outsourcing strategy is crucial to the proper accomplishment of an outsourcing project. By taking the time to think through your strategy beforehand, you will have a clear idea of your desired outcomes. This will make your RFP of higher quality and will result in a much easier negotiation process.

    Most MSPs are prepared to offer a standard proposal to clients who do not know what they want. These are agreements that are doomed to fail. A clearly defined set of goals (discussed in Phase 1), risks, and KPIs and metrics (covered in this phase) makes the agreement more beneficial for both parties in the long run.

    1. Identify goals and objectives
    2. Determine mission statement
    3. Define roles and responsibilities
    4. Identify risks and constraints
    5. Define KPIs and metrics
    6. Complete outsourcing strategy

    A successful outsourcing initiative depends on rigorous preparation

    Outsourcing is a garbage in, garbage out initiative. You need to give your service provider the information they need to provide an effective product.

    • Data quality is critical to your outsourcing initiative's success.
    • Your vendor will be much better equipped to help you and to better price its services if it has a thorough understanding of your IT environment.
    • This means more than just building a catalog of your hardware and software. You will need to make available documented policies and processes so you and your vendor can understand where they fit in.
    • Failure to completely document your environment can lead to a much longer time to value as your provider will have to spend much more time (and thus much more money) getting their service up and running.

    "You should fill the gap before outsourcing. You should make sure how to measure tickets, how to categorize, and what the cost of outsourcing will be. Then you'll be able to outsource the execution of the service. Start your own processes and then outsource their execution."
    – Kris Krishan, Head of IT and business systems, Waymo

    Case Study

    Digital media company built an outsourcing strategy to improve customer satisfaction

    INDUSTRY: Digital Media

    SOURCE: Auxis

    Challenge

    A Canadian multi-business company with over 13,000 employees would like to maintain a growing volume of digital content with their endpoint management.

    The client operated a tiered model service desk. Tier 1 was outsourced, and tier 2 tasks were done internally, for more complex tasks and projects.

    As a result of poor planning and defining goals, the company had issues with:

    • Low-quality ticket handling
    • High volume of tickets escalated to tier 2, restraining them from working on complex tickets
    • High turn over and a challenge with talent retention
    • Insufficient documentation to train external tier 1 team
    • Long resolution time and low end-user satisfaction

    Solution

    The company structured a strategy for outsourcing service desk and defined their expectations and requirements.

    They engaged with another outsourcer that would fulfill their requirements as planned.

    With the help of the outsourcer's consulting team, the client was able to define the gaps in their existing processes and system to:

    • Implement a better ticketing system that could follow best-practices guidelines
    • Restructure the team so they would be able to handle processes efficiently

    Results

    The proactive planning led to:

    • Significant improvement in first call resolution (82%).
    • MTTR improvement freed tier 2 to focus on business strategic objectives and allowed them to work on higher-value activities.
    • With a better strategy around outsourcing planning, the company saved 20% of cost compared to the previous outsourcer.
    • As a result of this partnership, the company is providing a 24/7 structure in multiple languages, which is aligned with the company's growth.
    • Due to having a clear strategy built for the project, the client now has better visibility into metrics that support long-term continual improvement plans.

    Define roles and responsibilities for the outsourcing transition to form the base of your outsourcing strategy

    There is no "I" in outsource; make sure the whole team is involved

    Outsourcing is a complete top-to-bottom process that involves multiple levels of engagement:

    • Management must make high-level decisions about staffing and negotiate contract details with the vendor.
    • Service desk employees must execute on the documentation and standardization of processes in an effort to increase maturity.
    • Roles and responsibilities need to be clearly defined to ensure that all aspects of the transition are completed on time.
    • Implement a full-scale effort that involves all relevant staff. The most common mistake is to have the project design follow the same top-down pattern as the decision-making process.

    Info-Tech Insight

    The service desk doesn't operate in isolation. The service desk interfaces with many other parts of the organization (such as finance, purchasing, field support, etc.), so it's important to ensure you engage stakeholders from other departments as well. If you only engage the service desk staff in your discussions around outsourcing strategy and RFP development, you may miss requirements that will come up when it's too late.

    2.1.1 Identify internal outsourcing roles and responsibilities

    2 hours

    1. The sample RACI chart in section 5 of the Project Charter Template outlines which positions are responsible, accountable, consulted, and informed for each major task within the outsourcing project.
    2. Responsible, is the group that is responsible for the execution and oversight of activities for the project. Accountable is the owner of the task/process, who is accountable for the results and outcomes. Consulted is the subject matter expert (SME) who is actively involved in the task/process and consulted on decisions. Informed is not actively involved with the task/process and is updated about decisions around the task/process.
    3. Make sure that you assign only one person as accountable per process. There can be multiple people responsible for each task. Consulted and Informed are optional for each task.
    4. Complete the RACI chart with recommended participants, and document in your service desk outsourcing project charter, under section 5.

    Input

    • RACI template
    • Org chart

    Output

    • List of roles and responsibilities for outsource project

    Materials

    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • Markers
    • Laptops

    Participants

    • IT Director/CIO
    • Service Desk Manager
    • Service Desk Team

    Download the Project Charter Template

    Step 2.2

    Outline potential risks and constraints

    Activities

    2.2.1 Identify potential risks and constraints that may impact achievement of objectives

    2.2.2 Arrange groups of tension metrics to balance your reporting

    Design an Outsourcing Strategy

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Outsourcing objectives
    • Potential risks

    This step involves the following participants:

    • IT Managers
    • Project Team
    • Service Desk Manager

    Outcomes of this step

    • Mitigation strategy for each risk
    • Service desk metrics

    Know your constraints to reduce surprises during project implementation

    No service desk is perfect; know your limits and plan accordingly

    Define your constraints to outsourcing the service desk.

    Consider all types of constraints and opportunities, including:

    • Business forces
    • Economic cycles
    • Disruptive tech
    • Regulation and compliance issues
    • Internal organizational issues

    Within the scope of a scouring decision, define your needs and objectives, measure those as much as possible, and compare them with the "as-is" situation.

    Start determining what alternative approaches/scenarios the organization could use to fill the gaps. Start a comparison of scenarios against drivers, goals, and risks.

    Constraints

    Goals and objectives

    • Budget
    • Maturity
    • Compliance
    • Regulations
    • Outsourcing Strategy

    Plan ahead for potential risks that may impede your strategy

    Risk assessment must go hand-in-hand with goal and objective planning

    Risk is inherent with any outsourcing project. Common outsourcing risks include:

    • Lack of commitment to the customer's goals from the vendor.
    • The distraction of managing the relationship with the vendor.
    • A perceived loss of control and a feeling of over-dependence on your vendor.
    • Managers may feel they have less influence on the development of strategy.
    • Retained staff may feel they have become less skilled in their specialist field.
    • Unanticipated expenses that were assumed to be offered by the vendor.
    • Savings only result from high capital investment in new projects on the part of the customer.

    Analyze the risks associated with a specific scenario. This analysis should identify and understand the most common sourcing and vendor risks using a risk-reward analysis for selected scenarios. Use tools and guidelines to assess and manage vendor risk and tailor risk evaluation criteria to the types of vendors and products.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Plan for the worst to prevent it from happening. Evaluating risk should cover a wide variety of scenarios including the worst possible cases. This type of thinking will be crucial when developing your exit strategy in a later exercise.

    2.2.1 Identify potential risks and constraints that may impact achievement of objectives

    1-3 hours

    1. Brainstorm any potential risks that may arise through the outsourcing project. Describe each risk and categorize both its probability of occurring and impact on the organization as high (H), medium (M), or low (L), using the table below:
    Risk Description

    Probability(H/M/L)

    Impact(H/M/L)Planned Mitigation
    Lack of documentationMMUse cloud-based solution to share documents.
    Knowledge transferLMDetailed knowledge-sharing agreement in place in the RFP.
    Processes not followedLHClear outline and definition of current processes.
    1. Identify any constraints for your outsourcing strategy that may restrict, limit, or place certain conditions on the outsourcing project.
      • This may include budget restrictions or staffing limitations.
      • Identifying constraints will help you be prepared for risks and will lessen their impact.
    2. Document risks and constraints in section 6 of the Service Desk Outsourcing Project Charter Template.

    Input

    • RACI template
    • Org chart

    Output

    • List of roles and responsibilities for outsource project

    Materials

    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • Markers

    Participants

    • IT Director/CIO
    • Service Desk Manager
    • Service Desk Team

    Download the Project Charter Template

    Define service tiers and roles to develop clear vendor SLAs

    Management of performance, SLAs, and customer satisfaction remain the responsibility of your organization.

    Define the tiers and/or services that will be the responsibility of the MSP, as well as escalations and workflows across tiers. A sample outsourced structure is displayed here:

    External Vendor

    Tickets beyond the scope of the service desk staff need to be escalated back to the vendor responsible for the affected system.

    Tier 3

    Tickets that are focused on custom applications and require specialized or advanced support are escalated back to your organization's second- and third-level support teams.

    Tier 2

    The vendor is often able to provide specialized support for standard applications. However, the desktop support still needs someone onsite as that service is very expensive to outsource.

    Tier 1

    Service desk outsource vendors provide first-line response. This includes answering the phones, troubleshooting simple problems, and redirecting requests that are more complex.

    Info-Tech Insight

    If you outsource everything, you'll be at the mercy of consultancy or professional services shops later on. You won't have anyone in-house to help you deploy anything; you're at the mercy of a consultant to come in and tell you what to do and how much to spend. Keep your highly skilled people in-house to offset what you'd have to pay for consultancy. If you need to repatriate your service desk later on, you will need skills in-house to do so.

    Don't become obsessed with managing by short-term metrics – look at the big picture

    "Good" metric results may simply indicate proficient reactive fixing; long-term thinking involves implementing proactive, balanced solutions.

    KPIs demonstrate that you are running an effective service desk because:

    • You close an average of 300 tickets per week
    • Your first call resolution is above 90%
    • Your talk time is less than five minutes
    • Surveys reveal clients are satisfied

    While these results may appear great on the surface, metrics don't tell the whole story.

    The effort from any support team seeks to balance three elements:

    FCR: Time; Resources; Quality

    First-Contact Resolution (FCR) Rate

    Percentage of tickets resolved during first contact with user (e.g. before they hang up or within an hour of submitting ticket). Could be measured as first-contact, first-tier, or first-day resolution.

    End-User Satisfaction

    Perceived value of the service desk measured by a robust annual satisfaction survey of end users and/or transactional satisfaction surveys sent with a percentage of tickets.

    Ticket Volume and Cost Per Ticket

    Monthly operating expenses divided by average ticket volume per month. Report ticket volume by department or ticket category, and look at trends for context.

    Average Time to Resolve (incidents) or Fulfill (service requests)

    Time elapsed from when a ticket is "open" to "resolved." Distinguish between ticket resolution vs. closure, and measure time for incidents and service requests separately.

    Focus on tension metrics to achieve long-term success

    Tension metrics help create a balance by preventing teams from focusing on a single element.

    For example, an MSP built incentives around ticket volume for their staff, but not the quality of tickets. As a result, the MSP staff rushed through tickets and gamed the system while service quality suffered.

    Use metrics to establish baselines and benchmarking data:

    • If you know when spikes in ticket volumes occur, you can prepare to resource more appropriately for these time periods
    • Create KB articles to tackle recurring issues and assist tier 1 technicians and end users.
      • Employ a root cause analysis to eliminate recurring tickets.

    "We had an average talk time of 15 minutes per call and I wanted to ensure they could handle those calls in 15 minutes. But the behavior was opposite, [the vendor] would wrap up the call, transfer prematurely, or tell the client they'd call them back. Service levels drive behavior so make sure they are aligned with your strategic goals with no unintended consequences."
    – IT Services Manager, Banking

    Info-Tech Insight

    Make sure your metrics work cooperatively. Metrics should be chosen that cause tension on one another. It's not enough to rely on a fast service desk that doesn't have a high end-user satisfaction rate or runs at too high a cost; there needs to be balance.

    2.2.2 Arrange groups of tension metrics to balance your reporting

    1-3 hours

    1. Define KPIs and metrics that will be critical to service desk success.
    2. Distribute sticky notes of different colors to participants around the table.
    3. Select a space to place the sticky notes – a table, whiteboard, flip chart, etc. – and divide it into three zones.
    4. Refer to your defined list of goals and KPIs from activity 1.1.3 and discuss metrics to fulfill each KPI. Note that each goal (critical success factor, CSF) may have more than one KPI. For instance:
      1. Goal 1: Increase end-user satisfaction; KPI 1: Improve average transactional survey score. KPI 2: Improve annual relationship survey score.
      2. Goal 2: Improve service delivery; KPI 1: Reduce time to resolve incidents. KPI 2: Reduce time to fulfill service requests.
    5. Recall that tension metrics must form a balance between:
      1. Time
      2. Resources
      3. Quality
    6. Record the results in section 7 of the Service Desk Outsourcing Project Charter Template.

    Input

    • Service desk outsourcing goals
    • Service desk outsourcing KPIs

    Output

    • List of service desk metrics

    Materials

    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • Sticky notes
    • Markers
    • Laptops

    Participants

    • Project Team
    • Service Desk Manager

    Download the Project Charter Template

    Phase 3

    Develop an RFP and make a long-term relationship

    Define the goal

    Design an outsourcing strategy

    Develop an RFP and make a long-term relationship

    1.1 Identify goals and objectives

    1.2 Assess outsourcing feasibility

    2.1 Identify project stakeholders

    2.2 Outline potential risks and constraints

    3.1 Prepare a service overview and responsibility matrix

    3.2 Define your approach to vendor relationship management

    3.3 Manage the outsource relationship

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Build your outsourcing RFP
    • Set expectations with candidate vendors
    • Score and select your vendor
    • Manage your relationship with the vendor

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • CIO
    • Service Desk Manager
    • IT Managers
    • Project Managers

    Define requirements for outsourcing service desk support

    Step 3.1

    Prepare a service overview and responsibility matrix

    Activities

    3.1.1 Evaluate your technology, people, and process requirements

    3.1.2 Outline which party will be responsible for which service desk processes

    This step requires the following inputs:

    • Service desk processes and requirements

    This step involves the following participants:

    • CIO
    • Service Desk Manager
    • IT Managers
    • Project Managers

    Outcomes of this step

    • Knowledge management and technology requirements
    • Self-service requirements

    Develop an RFP and make a long-term relationship

    Create a detailed RFP to ensure your candidate vendor will fulfill all your requirements

    At its core, your RFP should detail the outcomes of your outsourcing strategy and communicate your needs to the vendor.

    The RFP must cover business needs and the more detailed service desk functions required. Many enterprises only consider the functionality they need, while ignoring operational and selection requirements.

    Negotiate a supply agreement with the preferred outsourcer for delivery of the required services. Ensure your RFP covers:

    1. Service specification
    2. Service levels
    3. Roles and responsibilities
    4. Transition period and acceptance
    5. Prices, payment, and duration
    6. Agreement administration
    7. Outsourcing issues

    In addition to defining your standard requirements, don't forget to take into consideration the following factors when developing your RFP:

    • Employee onboarding and hardware imaging for new users
    • Applications you need current and future support for
    • Reporting requirements
    • Self-service options
    • Remote support needs and locations

    Although it may be tempting, don't throw everything over the wall at your vendor in the RFP. Evaluate your service desk functions in terms of quality, cost effectiveness, and the value provided from the vendor. Organizations should only outsource functions that the vendor can operate better, faster, or cheaper.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Involve the right stakeholders in developing your RFP, not just service desk. If only service desk is involved in RFP discussion, the connection between tier 1 and specialists will be broken, as some processes are not considered from IT's point of view.

    Identify ITSM solution requirements

    Your vendor probably uses a different tool to manage their processes; make sure its capabilities align with the vision of your service desk.

    Your service desk and outsourcing strategy were both designed with your current ITSM solution in mind. Before you hand the reins to an MSP, it is crucial that you outline how your current ITSM solution is being used in terms of functionality.

    Find out if it's better to have the MSP use their own ITSM tools or your ITSM solution.

    Benefits of operating within your own ITSM while outsourcing the service desk:

    Disadvantages of using your own ITSM while outsourcing the service desk:

    • If you provide the service catalog, it's easier to control your ITSM tool yourself.
    • Using your own ITSM and giving access to the outsourcer will allow you to build your dashboard and access your operational metrics rather than relying on the MSP to provide you with metrics.
    • Usage of the current tool may be extended across multiple departments, so it may be in the best interest of your business to have the vendor adopt usage of the current tool.
    • While many ITSM solutions have similar functions, innate differences do exist between them. Outsourcers mostly want to operate in their own ticketing solution. As other departments besides IT may be using the service management tool, you will need to have the same tool across the organization. This makes purchasing the new ITSM license very expensive, unless you operate in the same ITSM as the outsourcer.
    • You need your vendor to be able to use the system you have in order to meet your requirements, which will limit your options in the market.
    • If the outsourcer is using your ITSM, you should provide training to them.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Defining your tool requirements can be a great opportunity to get the tool functionality you always wanted. Many MSPs offer enterprise-level ITSM tools and highly mature processes that may tempt you to operate within their ITSM environment. However, first define your goals for such a move, as well as pros and cons of operating in their service management tool to weigh if its benefits overweigh its downfalls.

    Case Study

    Lone Star College learned that it's important to select a vendor whose tool will work with your service desk

    INDUSTRY: Education

    SOURCE: ServiceNow

    Challenge

    Lone Star College has an end-user base of over 100,000 staff and students.

    The college has six campuses across the state of Texas, and each campus was using its own service desk and ITSM solution.

    Initially, the decision was to implement a single ITSM solution, but organizational complexity prevented that initiative from succeeding.

    A decision was made to outsource and consolidate the service desks of each of the campuses to provide more uniform service to end users.

    Solution

    Lone Star College selected a vendor that implemented FrontRange.

    Unfortunately, the tool was not the right fit for Lone Star's service and reporting needs.

    After some discussion, the outsourcing vendor made the switch to ServiceNow.

    Some time later, a hybrid outsourced model was implemented, with Lone Star and the vendor combining to provide 24/7 support.

    Results

    The consolidated, standardized approach used by Lone Star College and its vendor has created numerous benefits:

    • Standardized reporting
    • High end-user satisfaction
    • All SLAs are being met
    • Improved ticket resolution times
    • Automated change management.

    Lone Star outsourced in order to consolidate its service desks quickly, but the tools didn't quite match.

    It's important to choose a tool that works well with your vendor's, otherwise the same standardization issues can persist.

    Design your RFP to help you understand what the vendor's standard offerings are and what it is capable of delivering

    Your RFP should be worded in a way that helps you understand what your vendor's standard offerings are because that's what they're most capable of delivering. Rather than laying out all your requirements in a high level of detail, carefully craft your questions in a probing way. Then, understand what your current baseline is, what your target requirements are, and assess the gap.

    Design the RFP so that responses can easily be compared against one another.

    It is common to receive responses that are very different – RFPs don't provide a response framework. Comparing vastly different responses can be like comparing apples to oranges. Not only are they immensely time consuming to score, their scores also don't end up accurately reflecting the provider's capabilities or suitability as a vendor.

    If your RFP is causing a ten minute printer backlog, you're doing something wrong.

    Your RFP should not be hundreds of pages long. If it is, there is too much detail.

    Providing too much detail can box your responses in and be overly limiting on your responses. It can deter potentially suitable provider candidates from sending a proposal.

    Request
    For
    Proposal

    "From bitter experience, if you're too descriptive, you box yourself in. If you're not descriptive enough, you'll be inundated with questions or end up with too few bidders. We needed to find the best way to get the message across without putting too much detail around it."
    – Procurement Manager, Utilities

    Info-Tech's Service Desk Outsourcing RFP Template contains nine sections

    1. Statement of work
      • Purpose, coverage, and participation ààInsert the purpose and goals of outsourcing your service desk, using steps 1.1 findings in this blueprint as reference.
    2. General information
      • Information about the document, enterprise, and schedule of events ààInsert the timeline you developed for the RFP issue and award process in this section.
    3. Proposal preparation instructions
      • The vendor's understanding of the RFP, good faith statement, points of contact, proposal submission, method of award, selection and notification.
    4. Service overview
      • Information about organizational perspective, service desk responsibility matrix, vendor requirements, and service level agreements (SLAs).
    5. Scope of work, specifications and requirements
      • Technical and functional requirements à Insert the requirements gathered in Phase 1 in this section of the RFP. Remember to include both current and future requirements.
    6. Exit conditions
      • Overview of exit strategy and transition process.
    7. Vendor qualifications and references
    8. Account management and estimated pricing
    9. Vendor certification
    This is a screenshot of the Service Desk Outsourcing RFP Template.

    The main point of focus in this document is defining your requirements (discussed in Phase 1) and developing proposal preparation instructions.

    The rest of the RFP consists mostly of standard legal language. Review the rest of the RFP template and adapt the language to suit your organization's standards. Check with your legal departments to make sure the RFP adheres to company policies.

    3.1.1 Evaluate your technology, people, and process requirements

    1-2 hours

    1. Review the outsourcing goals you identified in Phase 1 (activity 1.1.3).
    2. For each goal, divide the defined requirements from your requirements database library (activity 1.2.1) into three areas:
      1. People Requirements
      2. Process Requirements
      3. Technical Requirements
    3. Group your requirements based on characteristics (e.g. recovery capabilities, engagement methodology, personnel, etc.).
    4. Validate these requirements with the relevant stakeholders.
    5. Document your results in section 4 of the Service Desk Outsourcing RFP Template.

    Input

    • Identified key requirements

    Output

    • Refined requirements to input into the RFP

    Materials

    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • Markers
    • Laptops

    Participants

    • IT Director/CIO
    • Service Desk Manager
    • IT Managers

    Download the Service Desk Outsourcing RFP Template

    Assess knowledge management and technology requirements to enable the outsourcer with higher quality work

    Retain ownership of the knowledgebase to foster long-term growth of organizational intelligence

    With end users becoming more and more tech savvy, organizational intelligence is becoming an increasingly important aspect of IT support. Modern employees are able and willing to troubleshoot on their own before calling into the service desk. The knowledgebase and FAQs largely facilitate self-serve trouble shooting, both of which are not core concerns for the outsource vendor.

    Why would the vendor help you empower end users and decrease ticket volume when it will lead to less revenue in the future? Ticket avoidance is not simply about saving money by removing support. It's about the end-user community developing organizational intelligence so that it doesn't need as much technical support.

    Organizational intelligence occurs when shared knowledge and insight is used to make faster, better decisions.

    When you outsource, the flow of technical insight to your end-user community slows down or stops altogether unless you proactively drive it. Retain ownership of the knowledgebase and ensure that the content is:

    1. Validated to ensure it accurately describes the best solution.
    2. Actionable to ensure it prescribes repeatable, verifiable steps.
    3. Contextual to ensure the reader knows when NOT to apply the knowledge.
    4. Maintained to ensure the solution remains current.
    5. Applied, since knowledge is a cost with no benefit unless you apply it and turn it into organizational intelligence.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Include knowledge management process in your ticket handling workflows to make sure knowledge is transferred to the MSP and end users. For more information on knowledge management, refer to Info-Tech's Standardize the Service Desk and Optimize the Service Desk With a Shift-Left Strategy blueprints.

    Assess self-service requirements in your outsourcing plan

    When outsourcing the service desk, determine who will take ownership of the self-service portal.

    Nowadays, outsourcers provide innovative services such as self-serve options. However, bear in mind that the quality of such services is a differentiating factor. A well-maintained portal makes it easy to:

    • Report incidents efficiently via use-case-based forms
    • Place requests via a business-oriented service catalog
    • Automate request processes
    • Give visibility on ticket status
    • Access knowledgebase articles
    • Provide status on critical systems
    • Look for services by both clicking service lists and searching them
    • Provide 24/7 service via interactive communication with live agent and AI-powered machine
    • Streamline business process in multiple departments rather than only IT

    In the outsourcing process, determine your expectations from your vendor on self-serve options and discuss how they will fulfill these requirements. Similar to other processes, work internally to define a list of services your organization is providing that you can pass over to the outsourcer to convert to a service catalog.

    Use Info-Tech's Sample Enterprise Services document to start determining your business's services.

    Assess admin rights in your outsourcing plan to give access to the outsourcer while you keep ownership

    Provide accessibility to account management to improve self-service, which enables:

    • Group owners to be named who can add or remove people from their operating units
    • Users to update attributes such as photos, address, phone number
    • Synchronization with HRIS (Human Resource Information Systems) to enable two-way communication on attribute updates
    • Password reset self-service

    Ensure the vendor has access rights to execute regular clean up to help:

    • Find stale and inactive user and computer accounts (inactive, expired, stale, never logged in)
    • Bulk move and disable capabilities
    • Find empty groups and remove
    • Find and assess NTFS permissions
    • Automated tasks to search and remediate

    Give admin rights to outsourcer to enable reporting and auditing capabilities, such as:

    • Change tracking and notifications
    • Password reset attempts, account unlocks, permission and account changes
    • Anomaly detection and remediation
    • Privilege abuse, such as password sharing

    Info-Tech Insight

    Provide your MSP with access rights to enable the service desk to have account management without giving too much authentication. This way you'll enable moving tickets to the outsourcer while you keep ownership and supervision.

    3.1.2 Outline which party will be responsible for which service desk processes

    1-2 hours

    This activity is an expansion to the outcomes of activity 1.2.1, where you determined the outsourcing requirements and the party to deliver each requirement.

    1. Add your identified tasks from the requirements database library to the service desk responsibility matrix (section 4.2 of the Service Desk Outsourcing RFP Template).
    2. Break each task down into more details. For instance, incident management may include tier 1, tier 2/3, KB creation and update, reporting, and auditing.
    3. Refer to section 4.1 of your Project Charter to review the responsible party for each use case.
    4. Considering the use cases, assess whether your organization, the MSP, or both parties will be responsible for the task.
    5. Document the results in section 4.2 of the RFP.

    Input

    • Identified key requirements

    Output

    • Responsible party to deliver each task

    Materials

    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • Markers
    • Laptops

    Participants

    • IT Director/CIO
    • Service Desk Manager
    • IT Managers

    Download the Service Desk Outsourcing RFP Template

    Step 3.2

    Define your approach to vendor relationship management

    Activities

    3.2.1 Define your SLA requirements

    3.2.2 Score each vendor to mitigate the risk of failure

    3.2.3 Score RFP responses

    3.2.4 Get referrals, conduct reference interviews and evaluate responses for each vendor

    Develop an RFP and make a long-term relationship

    This step requires the following inputs:

    • Service desk outsourcing RFP
    • List of service desk outsourcing requirements

    This step involves the following participants:

    • CIO
    • Service Desk Manager
    • IT Managers
    • Project Managers

    Outcomes of this step

    • Service desk SLA
    • RFP scores

    Don't rush to judgment; apply due diligence when selecting your vendor

    The most common mistake in vendor evaluation is moving too quickly. The process leading to an RFP evaluation can be exhausting, and many organizations simply want to be done with the whole process and begin outsourcing.

    The most common mistake in vendor evaluation is moving too quickly. The process leading to an RFP evaluation can be exhausting, and many organizations simply want to be done with the whole process and begin outsourcing.

    1. Call around to get referrals for each vendor
    2. Create a shortlist
    3. Review SLAs and contract terms
    4. Select your vendor

    Recognize warning signs in the MSP's proposal to ensure a successful negotiation

    Vendors often include certain conditions in their proposals that masquerade as appealing but may spell disaster. Watch for these red flags:

    1. Discounted Price
      • Vendors know the market value of their competitors' services. Price is not what sets them apart; it's the type of services offered as well as the culture present.
      • A noticeably low price is often indicative of a desperate organization that is not focused on quality managed services.
    2. No Pushback
      • Vendors should work to customize their proposal to suit both their capabilities and your needs. No pushback means they are not invested in your project as deeply as they should be.
      • You should be prepared for and welcome negotiations; they're a sign that both sides are reaching a mutually beneficial agreement.
    3. Continual SLA Improvement
      • Continual improvement is a good quality that your vendor should have, but it needs to have some strategic direction.
      • Throwing continual SLA improvement into the deal may seem great, but make sure that you'll benefit from the value-added service. Otherwise, you'll be paying for services that you don't actually need.

    Clearly define core vendor qualities before looking at any options

    Vendor sales and marketing people know just what to say to sway you: don't talk to them until you know what you're looking for.

    Geography

    Do you prefer global or local data centers? Do you need multiple locations for redundancy in case of disaster? Will language barriers be a concern?

    Contract Length

    Ensure you can terminate a poor arrangement by having shorter terms with optional renewals. It's better to renew and renegotiate if one side is losing in the deal in order to keep things fair. Don't assume that proposed long-term cost savings will provide a satisfactory service.

    Target Market

    Vendors are aiming at different business segments, from startups to large enterprises. Some will accept existing virtual machines, and others enforce compliance to appeal to government and health agencies.

    SLA

    A robust SLA strengthens a vendor's reliability and accountability. Agencies with special needs should have room in negotiations for customization. Providers should also account for regular SLA reviews and updates. Vendors should be tracking call volume and making projections that should translate directly to SLAs.

    Support

    Even if you don't need a vendor with 24/7 availability, vendors who cannot support this timing should be eliminated. You may want to upgrade later and will want to avoid the hassle of switching.

    Maturity

    Vendors must have the willingness and ability to improve processes and efficiencies over time. Maintaining the status-quo isn't acceptable in the constantly evolving IT world.

    Cost

    Consider which model makes the most sense: will you go with per call or per user pricing? Which model will generate vendor motivation to continually improve and meet your long-term goals? Watch out for variable pricing models.

    Define your SLA requirements so your MSP can create a solution that fits

    SLAs ensure accountability from the service provider and determine service price

    SLAs define the performance of the service desk and clarify what the provider and customer can expect in their outsourcing relationship.

    • Service categories
    • The acceptable range of end-user satisfaction
    • The scope of what functions of the service desk are being measured (availability, time to resolve, time to respond, etc.)
    • Credits and penalties for achieving or missing targets
    • Frequency of measurement/reporting
    • Provisions and penalties for ending the contractual relationship early
    • Management and communication structure
    • Escalation protocol for incidents relating to tiers 2 or 3

    Each MSP's RFP response will help you understand their basic SLA terms and enhanced service offerings. You need to understand the MSP's basic SLA terms to make sure they are adequate enough for your requirements. A well-negotiated SLA will balance the requirements of the customer and limit the liability of the provider in a win/win scenario.

    For more information on defining service level requirements, refer to Info-Tech's blueprint Reduce Risk With Rock-Solid Service-Level Agreements.

    3.2.1 Define your SLA requirements

    2-3 hours

    • As a team, review your current service desk SLA for the following items:
      • Response time
      • Resolution time
      • Escalation time
      • End-user satisfaction
      • Service availability
    • Use the sample table as a starting point to determine your current incident management SLA:
    • Determine your SLA expectations from the outsourcer.
    • Document your SLA expectations in section 4.4 of the RFP template.

    Participants: IT Managers, Service Desk Manager, Project Team

    Response
    PriorityResponse SLOResolution SLOEscalation Time
    T1
    Severity 1CriticalWithin 10 minutes4 hours to resolveImmediate
    Severity 2HighWithin 1 business hour8 business hours to resolve20 minutes
    Severity 3MediumWithin 4 business hours24 business hours to resolveAfter 20 minutes without progress
    Severity 4LowSame day (8 hours)72 business hours to resolve After 1 hour without progress
    SLO ResponseTime it takes for service desk to respond to service request or incident. Target response is 80% of SLO
    SLO ResolutionTime it takes to resolve incident and return business services to normal. Target resolution is 80% of SLO

    Download the Service Desk Outsourcing RFP Template

    Get a detailed plan from your selected vendor before signing a contract

    Build a standard process to evaluate candidate vendors

    Use section 5 of Info-Tech's Service Desk Outsourcing RFP Template for commonly used questions and requirements for outsourcing the service desk. Ask the right questions to secure an agreement that meets your needs. If you are already in a contract with an MSP, tale the opportunity of contract renewal to improve the contract and service.

    This is a screenshot of the Service Desk Outsourcing RFP Template.

    Download the Service Desk Outsourcing RFP Template

    Add your finalized assessment questions into Info-Tech's Service Desk Outsourcing RFP Scoring Tool to aggregate responses in one repository for comparison. Since the vendors are asked to respond in a standard format, it is easier to bring together all the responses to create a complete view of your options.

    This is an image of the Service Desk Vendor Proposal Scoring Tool

    Download the Service Desk Vendor Proposal Scoring Tool

    3.2.2 Score each vendor to mitigate the risk of failure

    1-2 hours

    Include the right requirements for your organization and analyze candidate vendors on their capability to satisfy them.

    1. Use section 5 of the RFP template to convert your determined requirements into questions to address in vendor briefings.
    2. Review the questions in the context of near- and long-term service desk outsourcing needs. In the template, we have separated requirements into 7 categories:
      • Vendor Requirements (VR)
      • Vendor Qualifications/Engagement/Administration Capabilities (VQ)
      • Service Operations (SO)
      • Service Support (SS)
      • Service Level Agreement (SLA)
      • Transition Processes (TP)
      • Account Management (AM)
    3. Define the priority for each question:
      • Required
      • Desired
      • Optional
    4. Leave the compliance and comments to when you brief with vendors.

    Input

    • Technical and functional requirements

    Output

    • Priority level for each requirement
    • Completed list of requirement questions

    Materials

    • Whiteboard/flip charts
    • Markers
    • Laptops

    Participants

    • IT Director/CIO
    • Service Desk Manager
    • IT Managers

    Download the Service Desk Outsourcing RFP Template

    3.2.3 Score RFP responses

    2-3 hours

    1. Enter the requirements questions into the RFP Scoring Tool and use it during vendor briefings.
    2. Copy the Required and Desired priority requirements from the previous activity into the RFP Questions column.
    3. Evaluate each RFP response against the RFP criteria based on the scoring scale.
    4. The Results section in the tool shows the vendor ranking based on their overall scores.
    5. Compare potential outsourcing partners considering scores on individual requirements categories and based on overall scores.

    Input

    • Completed list of requirement questions
    • Priority level for each requirement

    Output

    • List of top vendors for outsourcing the service desk

    Materials

    • Service Desk Vendor Proposal Scoring Tool

    Participants

    • Service Desk Manager
    • IT Managers
    • Project Managers
    • IT Director/CIO

    Download the Service Desk Vendor Proposal Scoring Tool

    3.2.3 Get referrals, conduct reference interviews, and evaluate responses for each vendor

    1. Outline a list of questions to conduct reference interviews with past/present clients of your candidate vendors.
    2. Use the reference interview template as a starting point. As a group review the questions and edit them to a list that will fulfill your requirements.
    3. Ask your candidate vendors to provide you with a list of three to five clients that have/had used their services. Make sure that vendors enforce the interview will be kept anonymous and names and results won't be disclosed.
    4. Ask vendors to book a 20-30 minute call with you and their client.
    5. Document your interview comments in your updated reference interview template.
    6. Update the RFP scoring tool accordingly.

    Input

    • List of top vendors for outsourcing the service desk

    Output

    • Updated list of top vendors for outsourcing the service desk

    Materials

    • Service Desk Outsourcing Reference Interview Template
    • Service Desk Vendor Proposal Scoring Tool

    Participants

    • Service Desk Manager
    • IT Managers
    • Project Managers

    Download the Service Desk Vendor Proposal Scoring Tool

    Compare pricing models of outsourcing services

    It's a common sales tactic to use a low price as an easy solution. Carefully evaluate the vendors on your short-list and ensure that SLAs, culture, and price all match to your organization.

    Research different pricing models and accurately assess which model fits your organization. Consider the following pricing models:

    Pay per technician

    In this model, a flat rate is allocated to agents tackling your service desk tickets. This is a good option for building long-term relationship with outsourcer's agents and efficient knowledge transfer to the external team; however, it's not ideal for small organizations that deal with few tickets. This is potentially an expensive model for small teams.

    Pay per ticket

    This model considers the number of tickets handled by the outsourcer. This model is ideal if you only want to pay for your requirement. Although the internal team needs to have a close monitoring strategy to make sure the outsourcer's efficiency in ticket resolution.

    Pay per call

    This is based on outbound and inbound calls. This model is proper for call centers and can be less expensive than the other models; however, tracking is not easy, as you should ensure service desk calls result in efficient resolution rather than unnecessary follow-up.

    Pay per time (minutes or hours)

    The time spent on tickets is considered in this model. With this model, you pay for the work done by agents, so that it may be a good and relatively cheap option. As quicker resolution SLA is usually set by the organization, customer satisfaction may drop, as agents will be driven to faster resolution, not necessarily quality of work.

    Pay per user

    This model is based on number of all users, or number of users for particular applications. In this model, correlation between number of users and number of tickets should be taken into account. This is an ideal model if you want to deal with impact of staffing changes on service price. Although you should first track metrics such as mean time to resolve and average number of tickets so you can prevent unnecessary payment based on number of users when most users are not submitting tickets.

    Step 3.3

    Manage the outsource relationship

    Activities

    3.3.1 Analyze your outsourced service desk for continual improvement

    3.3.2 Make a case to either rehabilitate your outsourcing agreement or exit

    3.3.3 Develop an exit strategy in case you need to end your contract early

    Develop an RFP and make a long-term relationship

    This step requires the following inputs:

    • Service desk SLA
    • List of impacted stakeholder groups
    • List of impacts and benefits of the outsourced service desk

    This step involves the following participants:

    • CIO
    • Service Desk Manager
    • IT Managers
    • Project Managers

    Outcomes of this step

    • Communication plan
    • Vendor management strategy

    Ensure formality of your vendor management practice

    A service desk outsourcing project is an ongoing initiative. Build a relationship plan to make sure the outsourcer complies with the agreement.

    This is an iamge of the cycle of relationship management and pre-contract management.

    Monitor Vendor Performance

    Key Activity:

    Measure performance levels with an agreed upon standard scorecard.

    Manage Vendor Risk

    Key Activity:

    Periodical assessment of the vendors to ensure they are meeting compliance standards.

    Manage Vendor Contracts and Relationships

    Key Activity:
    Manage the contracts and renewal dates, the level of demand for the services/products provided, and the costs accrued.

    COMPLETE Identify and Evaluate Vendors

    Key Activity:
    Develop a plan with procurement and key internal stakeholders to define clear, consistent, and stable requirements.

    COMPLETE Select a Vendor

    Key Activity:
    Develop a consistent and effective process for selecting the most appropriate vendor.

    Manage Vendor Contracts and Relationships

    Key Activity:
    Contracts are consistently negotiated to ensure the vendor and the client have a documented and consistent understanding of mutual expectations.

    Expect the vendor to manage processes according to your standards

    You need this level of visibility into the service desk process, whether in-house or outsourced

    Each of these steps requires documentation – either through standard operating procedures, SLAs, logs, or workflow diagrams.

    • Define key operating procedures and workflows
    • Record, classify, and prioritize tickets
    • Verify, approve, and fulfill tickets
    • Investigate, diagnose, and allocate tickets
    • Resolve, recover, and close tickets
    • Track and report

    "Make sure what they've presented to you is exactly what's happening."
    – Service Desk Manager, Financial Services

    Manage the vendor relationship through regular communication

    Regular contact with your MSP provides opportunities to address issues that emerge

    Designate a relationship manager to act as a liaison at the business to be a conduit between the business and the MSP.

    • The relationship manager will take feedback from the MSP and relate it back to you to bridge the technical and business gap between the two.

    Who should be involved

    • Routine review meetings should involve the MSP and your relationship manager.
    • Technical knowledge may be needed to address specific issues, but business knowledge and relationship management skills are absolutely required.
    • Other stakeholders and people who are deeply invested in the vendor relationship should be invited or at least asked to contribute questions and concerns.

    What is involved

    • Full review of the service desk statistics, escalations, staffing changes, process changes, and drivers of extra billing or cost.
    • Updates to key documentation for the issues listed above and changes to the knowledgebase.
    • Significant drivers of customer satisfaction and dissatisfaction.
    • Changes that have/are being proposed that can impact any of the above.

    Communicate changes to end users to avoid push back and get buy-in

    Top-down processes for outsourcing will leave end users in the dark

    • Your service desk staff has been involved in the outsourcing process the entire time, but end users are affected all the same.
    • The service desk is the face of IT. A radical shift in service processes and points of contact can be detrimental to not only the service desk, but all of IT.
    • Communicating the changes early to end users will both help them cope with the change and help the MSP achieve better results.
      • An internal communication plan should be rolled out in order to inform and educate end users about the changes associated with outsourcing the service desk.
    • Your relationship manager should be tasked with communicating the changes to end users. The focus should be on addressing questions or concerns about the transition while highlighting the value gained through outsourcing to an MSP.
    • Service quality is a two-way street; the end user needs to be informed of proper protocols and points of contact so that the service desk technicians can fulfill their duties to the best of their ability.

    "When my company decided to outsource, I performed the same role but for a different company. There was a huge disruption to the business flow and a lack of communication to manage the change. The transition took weeks before any end users figured out what the new processes were for submitting a ticket and who to ask for help, and from a personal side, it became difficult to maintain relationships with colleagues."
    – IT Specialist for a financial institution

    Info-Tech Insight

    Educate the enterprise on expectations and processes that are handled by the MSP. Identify stakeholder groups affected by the outsourced processes then build a communication plan on what's been changed, what the benefits are, and how they will be impacted. Determine a timeline for communicating these initiatives and how these announcements will be made. Use InfoTech's Sample Communication Plan as a starting point.

    Build a continual improvement plan to make sure your MSP is efficiently delivering services according to expectations

    Ensure that your quality assurance program is repeatable and applicable to the outsourced services

    1. Design a QA scorecard that can help you assess steps the outsourcer agents should follow. Keep the questionnaire high level but specific to your environment. The scorecard should include questions that follow the steps to take considering your intake channels. For instance, if end users can reach the service desk via phone, chat, and email, build your QA around assessing customer service for call, chat, and ticket quality.
    2. Build a training program for agents: Develop an internal monitoring plan to relay detailed feedback to your MSP. Assess performance and utilize KBs as training materials for coaching agents on challenging transactions.
    3. Everything that goes to your service desk has to be documented; there will be no organic transfer of knowledge and experience.
    4. You need to let your MSP know how their efforts are impacting the performance of your organization. Measure your internal performance against the external performance of your service desk.
    5. Constant internal check-ins ensure that your MSP is meeting the SLAs outlined in the RFP.
    6. Routine reporting of metrics and ticket trends allow you to enact problem management. Otherwise, you risk your MSP operating your service desk with no internal feedback from its owner.
    7. Use metrics to determine the service desk functionality.

    Consider the success story of your outsourced service desk

    Build a feedback program for your outsourced services. Utilize transactional surveys to discover and tell outsourcing success to the impacted stakeholders.

    Ensure you apply steps for providing feedback to make sure processes are handled as expected. Service desk is the face of IT. Customer satisfaction on ticket transactions reflects satisfaction with IT and the organization.

    Build customer satisfaction surveys and conduct them for every transaction to get a better sense of outsourced service desk functionality. Collaborate with the vendor to make sure you build a proper strategy.

    • Build a right list of questions. Multiple and lengthy questions may lead to survey taking fatigue. Make sure you ask the right questions and give an option to the customer to comment any additional notes.
    • Give the option to users to rate the transaction. Make the whole process very seamless and doable in a few seconds.
    • Ensure to follow-up on negative feedback. This will help you find gaps in services and provide training to improve customer service.

    3.3.1 Analyze your outsourced service desk for continual improvement

    1 hour

    1. In this project, you determined the KPIs based on your service desk objectives (activity 2.2.2).
    2. Refer to your list of metrics in section 7 of the Service Desk Outsourcing Project Charter.
    3. Think about what story you want to tell and determine what factors will help move the narrative.
    4. Discuss how often you would like to track these metrics. Determine the audience for each metric.
    5. Provide the list to the MSP to create reports with auto-distribution.

    Input

    • Determined CSFs and KPIs

    Output

    • List of metrics to track, including frequency to report and audience to report to

    Materials

    • Service Desk Outsourcing Project Charter

    Participants

    • Service Desk Manager
    • IT Managers
    • Project Managers

    Download the Project Charter Template

    Reward the MSP for performance instead of "punishing" them for service failure

    Turn your vendor into a true partner by including an "earn back" condition in the contract

    MSPs often offer clients credit requests (service credits) for their service failures, which are applied to the previous month's monthly recurring charge. They are applied to the last month's MRC (monthly reoccurring charges) at the end of term and then the vendor pays out the residual.

    However, while common, service credits are not always perceived to be a strong incentive for the provider to continually focus on improvement of mean-time-to-respond/mean-time-to-resolve.

    • Engage the vendor as a true partner within a relationship only based upon Service Credits.
    • Suggest the vendor include a minor change to the non-performance processes within the final agreement: the vendor implements an "earn back" condition in the agreement.
    • Where a bank of service credits exists because of non-performance, if the provider exceeds the SLA performance metrics for a number of consecutive months (two is common), then an amount of any prior credits received by client is returned to the provider as an earn back for improved performance.
    • This can be a useful mechanism to drive improved performance.

    Measure the outsourced service desk ROI constantly to drive efficient decisions for continual improvement or an exit plan

    Efficient outsourced service desk causes positive impacts on business satisfaction. To address the true value of the services outsourced, you should evaluate the return on investment (ROI) in these areas: Emotional ROI, Time ROI, Financial ROI

    Emotional ROI

    Service desk's main purpose should be to provide topnotch services to end users. Build a customer experience program and leverage transactional surveys and relationship surveys to constantly analyze customer feedback on service quality.

    Ask yourself:

    • How have the outsourced services improved customer satisfaction?
    • How has the service desk impacted the business brand?
    • Have these services improved agents' job satisfaction?
    • What is the NPS score of the service desk?
    • What should we do to reduce the detractor rate and improve satisfaction leveraging the outsourced service desk?

    Time ROI

    Besides customer satisfaction, SLA commitment is a big factor to consider when conducting ROI analysis.

    Ask these questions:

    • Have we had improvement in FCR?
    • What are the mean time to resolve incidents and mean time to fulfill requests?
    • Is the cost incurred to outsourced services worth improvement in such metrics?

    Financial ROI

    As already mentioned in Phase 1, the main motivation for outsourcing the service desk should not be around cost reduction, but to improve performance. Regardless, it's still important to understand the financial implications of your decision.

    To evaluate the financial impact of your outsourced service desk, ask these questions:

    • How much have the outsourced services impacted our business financially?
    • How much are we paying compared to when it was done internally?
    • Considering the emotional, time, and effort factors, is it worth bringing the services in house or changing the vendor?

    3.3.2 Make a case to either rehabilitate your outsourcing agreement or exit

    3-4 hours

    1. Refer to the results of activity 2.2.2. for the list of metrics and the metrics dashboard over the past quarter.
    2. Consider emotional and time ROI, assess end-user satisfaction and SLA, and run a report comparison with the baseline that you built prior to outsourcing the service desk.
    3. Estimate the organization's IT operating expenses over the next five years if you stay with the vendor.
    4. Estimate the organization's IT operating expenses over the next five years if you switch the vendor.
    5. Estimate the organization's IT operating expenses over the next five years if you repatriate the service desk.
    6. Estimate the non-recurring costs associated with the move, such as the penalty for early contract termination, data center moving costs, and cost of potential business downtime during the move. Sum them to determine the investment.
    7. Calculate the return on investment. Discuss and decide whether the organization should consider rehabilitating the vendor agreement or ending the partnership.

    Input

    • Outsourced service desk metrics
    • Operating expenses

    Output

    • Return on investment

    Materials

    • List of metrics
    • Laptop
    • Markers
    • Flip chart/whiteboard

    Participants

    • IT Director/CIO
    • Service Desk Manager
    • IT Managers

    For more information on conducting this activity, refer to InfoTech's blueprint Terminate the IT Infrastructure Outsourcing Relationship

    Define exit conditions to complete your contract with your MSP

    The end of outsourcing is difficult. Your organization needs to maintain continuity of service during the transition. Your MSP needs to ensure that its resources can be effectively transitioned to the next deployment with minimal downtime. It is crucial to define your exit conditions so that both sides can prepare accordingly.

    • Your exit conditions must be clearly laid out in the contract. Create a list of service desk functions and metrics that are important to your organization's success. If your MSP is not meeting those needs or performance levels, you should terminate your services.
    • Most organizations accomplish this through a clear definition of hard and measurable KPIs and metrics that must be achieved and what will happen in the case these metrics are not being regularly met. If your vendor doesn't meet these requirements as defined in your contract, you then have a valid reason and the ability to leave the agreement.

    Examples of exit conditions:

    • Your MSP did not meet their SLAs on priority 1 or 2 tickets two times within a month.
    • If they didn't meet the SLA twice in that 30 days, you could terminate the contract penalty-free.

    Info-Tech Insight

    If things start going south with your MSP, negotiate a "get well plan." Outline your problems to the MSP and have them come back to you with a list of how they're going to fix these problems to get well before you move forward with the contract.

    Try to rehabilitate before you repatriate

    Switching service providers or ending the contract can be expensive and may not solve your problems. Try to rehabilitate your vendor relationship before immediately ending it.

    You may consider terminating your outsourcing agreement if you are dissatisfied with the current agreement or there has been a change in circumstances (either the vendor has changed, or your organization has changed).

    Before doing so, consider the challenges:

    1. It can be very expensive to switch providers or end a contract.
    2. Switching vendors can be a large project involving transfer of knowledge, documentation, and data.
    3. It can be difficult to maintain service desk availability, functionality, and reliability during the transition.

    Diagnose the cause of the problem before assuming it's the MSP's fault. The issue may lie with poorly defined requirements and processes, lack of communication, poor vendor management, or inappropriate SLAs. Re-assess your strategy and re-negotiate your contract if necessary.

    Info-Tech Insight

    There are many reasons why outsourcing relationships fail, but it's not always the vendor's fault.

    Clients often think their MSP isn't doing a great job, but a lot of the time the reason comes back to the client. They may not have provided sufficient documentation on processes, were not communicating well, didn't have a regular point of contact, and weren't doing regular service reviews. Before exiting the relationship, evaluate why it's not working and try to fix things first.

    Don't stop with an exit strategy, you also need to develop a transition plan

    Plan out your transition timeline, taking into account current contract terms and key steps required. Be prepared to handle tickets immediately upon giving notice.

    • Review your outsourcing contract with legal counsel to identify areas of concern for lock-in or breech.
    • Complete a cost/benefit analysis.
    • Bring intellectual property (including ticket data, knowledge base articles, and reports) back in-house (if you'd like to repatriate the service desk) or transfer to the next service desk vendor (if you're outsourcing to another MSP).
    • Review and update service desk standard processes (escalation, service levels, ticket templates, etc.).
    • Procure service desk software, licenses, and necessary hardware as needed.
    • Train the staff (internal for repatriating the service desk, or external for the prospective MSP).
    • Communicate the transition plan and be prepared to start responding to tickets immediately.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Develop a transition plan about six months before the contract notice date. Be proactive by constantly tracking the MSP, running ROI analyses and training staff before moving the services to the internal team or the next MSP. This will help you manage the transition smoothly and handle intake channels so that upon potential exit, users won't be disrupted.

    3.3.3 Develop an exit strategy in case you need to end your contract early

    3-4 hours

    Create a plan to be prepared in case you need to end your contract with the MSP early.

    Your exit strategy should encompass both the conditions under which you would need to end your contract with the MSP and the next steps you will take to transition your services.

    1. Define the exit conditions you plan to negotiate into your contract with the MSP:
      • Identify the performance levels you will require your MSP to meet.
      • Identify the actions you expect the MSP to take if they fail to meet these performance levels.
      • Identify the conditions under which you would leave the contract early.
    2. Develop a strategy for transitioning services in the event you need to leave your contract with the MSP:
      • Will you hand the responsibility to a new MSP or repatriate the service desk back in-house?
      • How will you maintain services through the transition?
    3. Document your exit strategy in section 6 of the Service Desk Outsourcing RFP Template.

    Input

    • Outsourced service desk metrics
    • Operating expenses

    Output

    • Return on investment

    Materials

    • List of metrics
    • Laptop
    • Markers
    • Flip chart/whiteboard

    Participants

    • IT Director/CIO
    • Service Desk Manager
    • IT Managers

    Download the Service Desk Outsourcing RFP Template

    Summary of Accomplishment

    Problem Solved

    You have now re-envisioned your service desk by building a solid strategy for outsourcing it to a vendor. You first analyzed your challenges with the current service desk and evaluated the benefits of outsourcing services. Then you went through requirements assessment to find out which processes should be outsourced. Thereafter, you developed an RFP to communicate your proposal and evaluate the best candidates.

    You have also developed a continual improvement plan to ensure the outsourcer provides services according to your expectations. Through this plan, you're making sure to build a good relationship through incentivizing the vendor for accomplishments rather than punishing for service failures. However, you've also contemplated an exit plan in the RFP for potential consistent service failures.

    Ideally, this blueprint has helped you go beyond requirements identification and served as a means to change your mindset and strategy for outsourcing the service desk efficiently to gain long-term benefits.

    if you would like additional support, have our analysts guide you through other phases as part of an Info-Tech Workshop

    Contact your account representative for more information

    workshops@infotech.com

    1-888-670-8889

    Additional Support

    If you would like additional support, have our analysts guide you through other phases as part of an Info-Tech Workshop

    To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.

    Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech's historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.

    This is a picture of Info-Tech analyst Mahmoud Ramin

    Contact your account representative for more information.
    workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8889

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    This is a screenshot of activity 1.2.1 found in this blueprint

    Identify Processes to Outsource
    Identify service desk tasks that will provide the most value upon outsourcing.

    This is a screenshot of activity 3.2.2 found in this blueprint

    Score Candidate Vendors
    Evaluate vendors on their capabilities for satisfying your service desk requirements.

    Related Info-Tech Research

    Standardize the Service Desk

    • Improve customer service by driving consistency in your support approach and meeting SLAs.

    Outsource IT Infrastructure to Improve System Availability, Reliability, and Recovery

    • There are very few IT infrastructure components you should be housing internally – outsource everything else.

    Terminate the IT Infrastructure Outsourcing Relationship

    • There must be 50 ways to leave your vendor.

    Research Contributors and Experts

    Yev Khovrenkov; Enterprise Consultant, Solvera Solutions

    Kamil Salagan; I&O Manager, Bartek Ingredients

    Satish Mekerira; VP of IT, Coherus BioSciences

    Kris Krishan; Head of IT and Business Systems, Waymo

    Kris Arthur; Infra & Security Director, SEKO Logistics

    Valance Howden; Principal Research Advisor, Info-Tech Research Group

    Sandi Conrad; Principal Research Director, Info-Tech Research Group

    Graham Price; Senior Director of Executive Services, Info-Tech Research Group

    Barry Cousins; Practice Lead, Info-Tech Research Group

    Mark Tauschek; VP of I&O Research, Info-Tech Research Group

    Darin Stahl; Principal Research Advisor, Info-Tech Research Group

    Scott Yong; Principal Research Advisor, Info-Tech Research Group

    A special thank-you to five anonymous contributors

    Bibliography

    Allnutt, Charles. "The Ultimate List of Outsourcing Statistics." MicroSourcing, 2022. Accessed July 2022.
    "Considerations for outsourcing the service desk. A guide to improving your service desk and service delivery performance through outsourcing." Giva. Accessed May 2022.
    Hurley, Allison. "Service Desk Outsourcing | Statistics, Challenges, & Benefits." Forward BPO Inc., 2019. Accessed June 2022.
    Mtsweni, Patricia, et al. "The impact of outsourcing information technology services on business operations." South African Journal of Information Management, 2021, Accessed May 2022.
    "Offshore, Onshore or Hybrid–Choosing the Best IT Outsourcing Model." Calance, 2021. Accessed June 2022. Web.
    "Service Integration and Management (SIAM) Foundation Body of Knowledge." Scopism, 2020. Accessed May 2022.
    Shultz, Aaron. "IT Help Desk Outsourcing Pricing Models Comparison." Global Help Desk Services. Accessed June 2022. Web.
    Shultz, Aaron. "4 Steps to Accurately Measure the ROI of Outsourced Help Desk Services" Global Help Desk Services, Accessed June 2022. Web.
    Sunberg, John. "Great Expectations: What to Look for from Outsourced Service Providers Today." HDI. Accessed June 2022. Web.
    Walters, Grover. "Pivotal Decisions in outsourcing." Muma Case Review, 2019. Accessed May 2022.
    Wetherell, Steve. "Outsourced IT Support Services: 10 Steps to Better QA" Global Held Desk Services. Accessed May 2022. Web.

    Pandemic Preparation – The People Playbook

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}513|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Lead
    • Parent Category Link: /lead
    • Keeping employees safe – limiting exposure of employees to the virus and supporting them in the event they become ill.
    • Reducing potential disruption to business operations through employee absenteeism and travel restrictions.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Communication of facts and definitive action plans from credible leaders is the key to maintaining some stability during a time of uncertainty.
    • Remote work is no longer a remote possibility – implementing alternative temporary work arrangements that keep large groups of employees from congregating reduce risk of employee exposure and operational downtime.
    • Pandemic travel protocols are necessary to support staff and their continuation of work while traveling for business and/or if stuck in a high-risk, restricted area.

    Impact and Result

    • Assign accountability of key planning decisions to members of a pandemic response team.
    • Craft key messages in preparation for communicating to employees.
    • Cascade communications from credible sources in a way that will establish pandemic travel protocols.

    Pandemic Preparation – The People Playbook Research & Tools

    Start here. Read the Pandemic Preparation: The People Playbook

    Read our concise Playbook to find out how you can immediately prepare for the people side of pandemic planning.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    • Pandemic Preparation: The People Playbook
    [infographic]

    Debunk Machine Learning Endpoint Security Solutions

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}168|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Endpoint Security
    • Parent Category Link: /endpoint-security
    • Threat actors are more innovative than ever before and developing sophisticated methods of endpoints attacks capable of avoiding detection with traditional legacy anti-virus software.
    • Legacy anti-virus solutions rely on signatures and hence fail at detecting memory objects, and new and mutating malware.
    • Combined with the cybersecurity talent gap and the sheer volume of endpoint attacks, organizations need endpoint security solutions capable of efficiently and accurately blocking never-before-seen malware types and variants.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Don’t make machine learning a goal in itself. Think of how machine learning can help you achieve your goals.
    • Determine your endpoint security requirements and goals prior to shopping around for a vendor. Vendors can easily suck you into a vortex of marketing jargon and sell you tools that your organization does not need.
    • Machine learning alone is not a solution to catching malware. It is a computational method that can generalize and analyze large datasets, and output insights quicker than a human security analyst.

    Impact and Result

    • Consider deploying an endpoint protection technology that leverages machine learning into your existing endpoint security strategy to counteract against the unknown and to quickly sift through the large volumes of data.
    • Understand how machine learning methods can help drive your organization’s security goals.
    • Identify vendors that utilize machine learning in their endpoint security products.
    • Understand use cases of where machine learning in endpoint security has been successful.

    Debunk Machine Learning Endpoint Security Solutions Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should consider machine learning in endpoint security solutions, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Demystify machine learning concepts

    Understand basic machine learning concepts used in endpoint security.

    • Debunk Machine Learning Endpoint Security Solutions – Phase 1: Demystify Machine Learning Concepts

    2. Evaluate vendors that leverage machine learning

    Determine feature requirements to evaluate vendors.

    • Debunk Machine Learning Endpoint Security Solutions – Phase 2: Evaluate Vendors That Leverage Machine Learning
    • Endpoint Protection Request for Proposal
    [infographic]

    Perform an Agile Skills Assessment

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}153|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 10.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $32,166 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 15 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Development
    • Parent Category Link: /development
    • Your organization is trying to address the key delivery challenges you are facing. Early experiments with Agile are starting to bear fruit.
    • As part of maturing your Agile practice, you want to evaluate if you have the right skills and capabilities in place.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Focusing on the non-technical skills can yield significant returns for your products, your team, and your organization. These skills are what should be considered as the real Agile skills.

    Impact and Result

    • Define the skills and values that are important to your organization to be successful at being Agile.
    • Put together a standard criterion for measurement of the attainment of given skills.
    • Define the roadmap and communication plan around your agile assessment.

    Perform an Agile Skills Assessment Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should perform an agile skills assessment. review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Take stock of the Agile skills and values important to you

    Confirm the list of Agile skills that you wish to measure.

    • Perform an Agile Skills Assessment – Phase 1: Take Stock of the Agile Skills and Values Important to You
    • Agile Skills Assessment Tool
    • Agile Skills Assessment Tool Example

    2. Define an assessment method that works for you

    Define what it means to attain specific agile skills through a defined ascension path of proficiency levels, and standardized skill expectations.

    • Perform an Agile Skills Assessment – Phase 2: Define an Assessment Method That Works for You

    3. Plan to assess your team

    Determine the roll-out and communication plan that suits your organization.

    • Perform an Agile Skills Assessment – Phase 3: Plan to Assess Your Team
    • Agile Skills Assessment Communication and Roadmap Plan
    • Agile Skills Assessment Communication and Roadmap Plan Example
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Perform an Agile Skills Assessment

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Define Agile Skills and Maturity Levels

    The Purpose

    Learn about and define the Agile skills that are important to your organization.

    Define the different levels of attainment when it comes to your Agile skills.

    Define the standards on a per-role basis.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Get a clear view of the Agile skills important into meet your Agile transformation goals in alignment with organizational objectives.

    Set a clear standard for what it means to meet your organizational standards for Agile skills.

    Activities

    1.1 Review and update the Agile skills relevant to your organization.

    1.2 Define your Agile proficiency levels to evaluate attainment of each skill.

    1.3 Define your Agile team roles.

    1.4 Define common experience levels for your Agile roles.

    1.5 Define the skill expectations for each Agile role.

    Outputs

    A list of Agile skills that are consistent with your Agile transformation

    A list of proficiency levels to be used during your Agile skills assessment

    A confirmed list of roles that you wish to measure on your Agile teams

    A list of experience levels common to Agile team roles (example: Junior, Intermediate, Senior)

    Define the skill expectations for each Agile role

    Reduce Manual Repetitive Work With IT Automation

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}458|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.5/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $34,099 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 2 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Operations Management
    • Parent Category Link: /i-and-o-process-management
    • IT staff are overwhelmed with manual repetitive work.
    • You have little time for projects.
    • You cannot move as fast as the business wants.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Optimize before you automate.
    • Foster an engineering mindset.
    • Build a process to iterate.

    Impact and Result

    • Begin by automating a few tasks with the highest value to score quick wins.
    • Define a process for rolling out automation, leveraging SDLC best practices.
    • Determine metrics and continually track the success of the automation program.

    Reduce Manual Repetitive Work With IT Automation Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read this Executive Brief to understand why you should reduce manual repetitive work with IT automation.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Identify automation candidates

    Select the top automation candidates to score some quick wins.

    • Reduce Manual Repetitive Work With IT Automation – Phase 1: Identify Automation Candidates
    • IT Automation Presentation
    • IT Automation Worksheet

    2. Map and optimize process flows

    Map and optimize process flows for each task you wish to automate.

    • Reduce Manual Repetitive Work With IT Automation – Phase 2: Map & Optimize Process Flows

    3. Build a process for managing automation

    Build a process around managing IT automation to drive value over the long term.

    • Reduce Manual Repetitive Work With IT Automation – Phase 3: Build a Process for Managing Automation

    4. Build automation roadmap

    Build a long-term roadmap to enhance your organization's automation capabilities.

    • Reduce Manual Repetitive Work With IT Automation – Phase 4: Build Automation Roadmap
    • IT Automation Roadmap
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Reduce Manual Repetitive Work With IT Automation

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Identify Automation Candidates

    The Purpose

    Identify top candidates for automation.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Plan to achieve quick wins with automation for early value.

    Activities

    1.1 Identify MRW pain points.

    1.2 Drill down pain points into tasks.

    1.3 Estimate the MRW involved in each task.

    1.4 Rank the tasks based on value and ease.

    1.5 Select top candidates and define metrics.

    1.6 Draft project charters.

    Outputs

    MRW pain points

    MRW tasks

    Estimate of MRW involved in each task

    Ranking of tasks for suitability for automation

    Top candidates for automation & success metrics

    Project charter(s)

    2 Map & Optimize Processes

    The Purpose

    Map and optimize the process flow of the top candidate(s).

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Requirements for automation of the top task(s).

    Activities

    2.1 Map process flows.

    2.2 Review and optimize process flows.

    2.3 Clarify logic and finalize future-state process flows.

    Outputs

    Current-state process flows

    Optimized process flows

    Future-state process flows with complete logic

    3 Build a Process for Managing Automation

    The Purpose

    Develop a lightweight process for rolling out automation and for managing the automation program.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Ability to measure and to demonstrate success of each task automation, and of the program as a whole.

    Activities

    3.1 Kick off your test plan for each automation.

    3.2 Define process for automation rollout.

    3.3 Define process to manage your automation program.

    3.4 Define metrics to measure success of your automation program.

    Outputs

    Test plan considerations

    Automation rollout process

    Automation program management process

    Automation program metrics

    4 Build Automation Roadmap

    The Purpose

    Build a roadmap to enhance automation capabilities.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A clear timeline of initiatives that will drive improvement in the automation program to reduce MRW.

    Activities

    4.1 Build a roadmap for next steps.

    Outputs

    IT automation roadmap

    Further reading

    Reduce Manual Repetitive Work With IT Automation

    Free up time for value-adding jobs.

    ANALYST PERSPECTIVE

    Automation cuts both ways.

    Automation can be very, very good, or very, very bad.
    Do it right, and you can make your life a whole lot easier.
    Do it wrong, and you can suffer some serious pain.
    All too often, automation is deployed willy-nilly, without regard to the overall systems or business processes in which it lives.
    IT professionals should follow a disciplined and consistent approach to automation to ensure that they maximize its value for their organization.

    Derek Shank,
    Research Analyst, Infrastructure & Operations
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive summary

    Situation

    • IT staff are overwhelmed with manual repetitive work.
    • You have little time for projects.
    • You cannot move as fast as the business wants.

    Complication

    • Automation is simple to say, but hard to implement.
    • Vendors claim automation will solve all your problems.
    • You have no process for managing automation.

    Resolution

    • Begin by automating a few tasks with the highest value to score quick wins.
    • Define a process for rolling out automation, leveraging SDLC best practices.
    • Determine metrics and continually track the success of the automation program.

    Info-Tech Insight

    1. Optimize before you automate.The current way isn’t necessarily the best way.
    2. Foster an engineering mindset.Your team members may not be process engineers, but they should learn to think like one.
    3. Build a process to iterate.Effective automation can't be a one-and-done. Define a lightweight process to manage your program.

    Infrastructure & operations teams are overloaded with work

    • DevOps and digital transformation initiatives demand increased speed.
    • I&O is still tasked with security and compliance and audit.
    • I&O is often overloaded and unable to keep up with demand.

    Manual repetitive work (MRW) sucks up time

    • Manual repetitive work is a fact of life in I&O.
    • DevOps circles refer to this type of work simply as “toil.”
    • Toil is like treading water: it must be done, but it consumes precious energy and effort just to stay in the same place.
    • Some amount of toil is inevitable, but it's important to measure and cap toil, so it does not end up overwhelming your team's whole capacity for engineering work.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Follow our methodology to focus IT automation on reducing toil.

    Manual hand-offs create costly delays

    • Every time there is a hand-off, we lose efficiency and productivity.
    • In addition to the cost of performing manual work itself, we must also consider the impact of lost productivity caused by the delay of waiting for that work to be performed.

    Every queue is a tire fire

    Queues create waste and are extremely damaging. Like a tire fire, once you get started, they’re almost impossible to stamp out!

    Increase queues if you want

    • “More overhead”
    • “Lower quality”
    • “More variability”
    • “Less motivation”
    • “Longer cycle time”
    • “Increased risk”

    (Source: Edwards, citing Donald G. Reinersten: The Principles of Product Development Flow: Second Generation Lean Product Development )

    Increasing complexity makes I&O’s job harder

    Every additional layer of complexity multiplies points of failure. Beyond a certain level of complexity, troubleshooting can become a nightmare.

    Today, Operations is responsible for the outcomes of a full stack of a very complex, software-defined, API-enabled system running on infrastructure they may or may not own.
    – Edwards

    Growing technical debt means an ever-rising workload

    • Enterprises naturally accumulate technical debt.
    • All technology requires care and feeding.
    • I&O cannot control how much technology it’s expected to support.
    • I&O faces a larger and larger workload as technical debt accumulates.

    The systems built under each new technology paradigm never fully replace the systems built under the old paradigms. It’s not uncommon for an enterprise to have an accumulation of systems built over 10-15 years and have no budget, risk appetite, or even a viable path to replace them all. With each shift, who bares [SIC] the brunt of the responsibility for making sure the old and the new hang together? Operations, of course. With each new advance, Operations juggles more complexity and more layers of legacy technologies than ever before.
    – Edwards

    Most IT shops can’t have a dedicated engineering team

    • In most organizations, the team that builds things is best equipped to support them.
    • Often the knowledge to design systems and the knowledge to run those systems naturally co-exists in the same personnel resources.
    • When your I&O team is trying to do engineering work, they can end up frequently interrupted to perform operational tasks.
    A Venn Diagram is depicted which compares People who build things with People who run things. the two circles are almost completely overlapping, indicating the strong connection between the two groups.

    Personnel resources in most IT organizations overlap heavily between “build” and “run.”

    IT operations must become an engineering practice

    • Usually you can’t double your staff or double their hours.
    • IT professionals must become engineers.
    • We do this by automating manual repetitive work and reducing toil.
    Two scenarios are depicted. The first scenario is found at a hypothetical work camp, in which one employee performs the task of manually splitting firewood with an axe. In order to split twice as much firewood, the employee would need to spend twice the time. The second scenario is Engineering Operations. in this scenario, a wood processor is used to automate the task, allowing far more wood to be split in same amount of time.

    Build your Sys Admin an Iron Man suit

    Some CIOs see a Sys Admin and want to replace them with a Roomba. I see a Sys Admin and want to build them an Iron Man suit.
    – Deepak Giridharagopal, CTO, Puppet

    Two Scenarios are depicted. In one, an employee is replaced by automation, represented by a Roomba, reducing costs by laying off a single employee. In the second scenario, the single employee is given automated tools to do their job, represented by an iron-man suit, leading to a 10X boost in employee productivity.

    Use automation to reduce risk

    Consistency

    When we automate, we can make sure we do something the same way every time and produce a consistent result.

    Auditing and Compliance

    We can design an automated execution that will ship logs that provide the context of the action for a detailed audit trail.

    Change

    • Enterprise environments are continually changing.
    • When context changes, so does the procedure.
    • You can update your docs all you want, but you can't make people read them before executing a procedure.
    • When you update the procedure itself, you can make sure it’s executed properly.

    Follow Info-Tech’s approach: Start small and snowball

    • It’s difficult for I&O to get the staffing resources it needs for engineering work.
    • Rather than trying to get buy-in for resources using a “top down” approach, Info-Tech recommends that I&O score some quick wins to build momentum.
    • Show success while giving your team the opportunity to build their engineering chops.

    Because the C-suite relies on upwards communication — often filtered and sanitized by the time it reaches them — executives don’t see the bottlenecks and broken processes that are stalling progress.
    – Andi Mann

    Info-Tech’s methodology employs a targeted approach

    • You aren’t going to automate IT operations end-to-end overnight.
    • In fact, such a large undertaking might be more effort than it’s worth.
    • Info-Tech’s methodology employs a targeted approach to identify which candidates will score some quick wins.
    • We’ll demonstrate success, gain momentum, and then iterate for continual improvement.

    Invest in automation to reap long-term rewards

    • All too often people think of automation like a vacuum cleaner you can buy once and then forget.
    • The reality is you need to perform care and feeding for automation like for any other process or program.
    • To reap the greatest rewards you must continually invest in automation – and invest wisely.

    To get the full ROI on your automation, you need to treat it like an employee. When you hire an employee, you invest in that person. You spend time and resources training and nurturing new employees so they can reach their full potential. The investment in a new employee is no different than your investment in automation.– Edwards

    Measure the success of your automation program

    Example of How to Estimate Dollar Value Impact of Automation
    Metric Timeline Target Value
    Hours of manual repetitive work 12 months 20% reduction $48,000/yr.(1)
    Hours of project capacity 18 months 30% increase $108,000/yr.(2)
    Downtime caused by errors 6 months 50% reduction $62,500/yr.(3)

    1 15 FTEs x 80k/yr.; 20% of time on MRW, reduced by 20%
    2 15 FTEs x 80k/yr.; 30% project capacity, increased by 30%
    3 25k/hr. of downtime.; 5 hours per year of downtime caused by errors

    Automating failover for disaster recovery

    CASE STUDY

    Industry Financial Services
    Source Interview

    Challenge

    An IT infrastructure manager had established DR failover procedures, but these required a lot of manual work to execute. His team lacked the expertise to build automation for the failover.

    Solution

    The manager hired consultants to build scripts that would execute portions of the failover and pause at certain points to report on outcomes and ask the human operator whether to proceed with the next step.

    Results

    The infrastructure team reduced their achievable RTOs as follows:
    Tier 1: 2.5h → 0.5h
    Tier 2: 4h → 1.5h
    Tier 3: 8h → 2.5h
    And now, anyone on the team could execute the entire failover!

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    “Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful.”

    Guided Implementation

    “Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track.”

    Workshop

    “We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place.”

    Consulting

    “Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project.”

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

    Reduce Manual Repetitive Work With IT Automation – project overview

    1. Select Candidates 2. Map Process Flows 3. Build Process 4. Build Roadmap
    Best-Practice Toolkit

    1.1 Identify MRW pain points

    1.2 Drill down pain points into tasks

    1.3 Estimate the MRW involved in each task

    1.4 Rank the tasks based on value and ease

    1.5 Select top candidates and define metrics

    1.6 Draft project charters

    2.1 Map process flows

    2.2 Review and optimize process flows

    2.3 Clarify logic and finalize future-state process flows

    3.1 Kick off your test plan for each automation

    3.2 Define process for automation rollout

    3.3 Define process to manage your automation program

    3.4 Define metrics to measure success of your automation program

    4.1 Build automation roadmap

    Guided Implementations

    Introduce methodology.

    Review automation candidates.

    Review success metrics.

    Review process flows.

    Review end-to-end process flows.

    Review testing considerations.

    Review automation SDLC.

    Review automation program metrics.

    Review automation roadmap.

    Onsite Workshop Module 1:
    Identify Automation Candidates
    Module 2:
    Map and Optimize Processes
    Module 3:
    Build a Process for Managing Automation
    Module 4:
    Build Automation Roadmap
    Phase 1 Results:
    Automation candidates and success metrics
    Phase 2 Results:
    End-to-end process flows for automation
    Phase 3 Results:
    Automation SDLC process, and automation program management process
    Phase 4 Results:
    Automation roadmap

    Implement Infrastructure Shared Services

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}456|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Operations Management
    • Parent Category Link: /i-and-o-process-management
    • Organizations have service duplications for unique needs. These duplications increase business expenditure.
    • Lack of collaboration between business units to share their services increases business cost and reduces business units’ faith to implement shared services.
    • Transitioning infrastructure to shared services is challenging for many organizations. It requires an accurate planning and efficient communication between participating business units.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Identify your current process, tool, and people capabilities before implementing shared services. Understand the financial compensations prior to implementation and assess if your organization is ready for transitioning to shared services model.
    • Do not implement shared services when the nature of the services differs greatly between business units.

    Impact and Result

    • Understand benefits of shared services for the business and determine whether transitioning to shared services would benefit the organization.
    • Identify the best implementation plan based on goals, needs, and services.
    • Build a shared-services process to manage the plan and ensure its success.

    Implement Infrastructure Shared Services Research & Tools

    Start here – Read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should implement shared services, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Conduct gap analysis

    Identify benefits of shared services to your organization and define implementation challenges.

    • Implement Infrastructure Shared Services – Phase 1: Conduct Gap Analysis
    • Shared Services Implementation Executive Presentation
    • Shared Services Implementation Business Case Template
    • Shared Services Implementation Assessment Tool

    2. Choose the right path

    Identify your process and staff capabilities and discover which services will be transitioned to shared services plan. It will also help you to figure out the best model to choose.

    • Implement Infrastructure Shared Services – Phase 2: Choose the Right Path
    • Sample Enterprise Services

    3. Plan the transition

    Discuss an actionable plan to implement shared services to track the project. Walk through a communication plan to document the goals, progress, and expectations with customer stakeholders.

    • Implement Infrastructure Shared Services – Phase 3: Plan the Transition
    • Shared Services Implementation Roadmap Tool
    • Shared Services Implementation Customer Communication Plan
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Implement Infrastructure Shared Services

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Identify Challenges

    The Purpose

    Establish the need for change.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Set a clear understanding about benefits of shared services to your organization.

    Activities

    1.1 Identify your organization’s main drivers for using a shared services model.

    1.2 Define if it is beneficial to implement shared services.

    Outputs

    Shared services mission

    Shared services goals

    2 Assess Your Capabilities

    The Purpose

    Become aware of challenges to implement shared services and your capabilities for such transition.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Discover the primary challenges for transitioning to shared services, eliminate resistance factors, and identify your business potentials for implementation.

    Activities

    2.1 Identify your organization’s resistance to implement shared services.

    2.2 Assess process and people capabilities.

    Outputs

    Shared Services Business Case

    Shared Services Assessment

    3 Define the Model

    The Purpose

    Determine the shared services model.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Identify the core services to be shared and the best model that fits your organization.

    Activities

    3.1 Define core services that will be moved to shared services.

    3.2 Assess different models of shared services and pick the one that satisfies your goals and needs.

    Outputs

    List of services to be transferred to shared services

    Shared services model

    4 Implement and Communicate

    The Purpose

    Define and communicate the tasks to be delivered.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Confidently approach key stakeholders to make the project a reality.

    Activities

    4.1 Define the roadmap for implementing shared services.

    4.2 Make a plan to communicate changes.

    Outputs

    List of initiatives to reach the target state, strategy risks, and their timelines

    Draft of a communication plan

    Select an Enterprise Application

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}588|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 10.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $10,000 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 10 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Enterprise Applications
    • Parent Category Link: /enterprise-applications
    • Organizations rarely have both the sufficient knowledge and resources to properly evaluate, select, and implement an enterprise application software (EAS), forcing them to turn to external partnerships.
    • Inadequate and incomplete requirements skew the EAS selection in one direction or another. Many EAS projects fail due to a lack of clear description and specification of functional requirements.
    • The EAS technology market is so vast that it becomes nearly impossible to know where to start or how to differentiate between vendors and products.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Accountability for EAS success is shared between IT and the business. There is no single owner of an EAS. A unified approach to building your strategy promotes an integrated roadmap so all stakeholders have clear direction on the future state.
    • While technology is the key enabler of building strong customer experiences, there are many other drivers of dissatisfaction. IT must stand shoulder-to-shoulder with the business to develop a technology framework for enterprise applications.
    • EAS projects are more successful when the management team understands the strategic importance and the criticality of alignment. Time needs to be spent upfront aligning business strategies with EAS capabilities. Effective alignment between IT and the business should happen daily. Alignment doesn’t just occur at the executive level but at each level of the organization.

    Impact and Result

    • Conduct an EAS project preparedness assessment as a means to ensure you maximize the value of your time, effort, and spending.
    • Gather the necessary resources to form the team to conduct the EAS selection.
    • Gett the proper EAS requirement landscape by mapping out business capabilities and processes, translating into prioritized EAS requirements.
    • Review SoftwareReviews vendor reports to shortlist vendors for your RFP process.
    • Use Info-Tech’s templates and tools to gather your EAS requirements, build your RFP and evaluation scorecard, and build a foundational EAS selection framework.

    Select an Enterprise Application Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Select an Enterprise Application Software Storyboard - A blueprint which prepares you for a proper and better enterprise application selection outcome.

    Properly selecting and implementing an enterprise application requires a proper structure. This blueprint guides you with a framework to help in such project, including steps such as assessing readiness, plan for the right resources, requirements gathering, shortlisting, obtaining and evaluating vendor responses, and preparing for implementation.

    • Select an Enterprise Application Software Storyboard

    2. Select an Enterprise Application Readiness Assessment Checklist – a checklist to assess your readiness towards moving ahead with the selection process.

    The EAS Readiness Checklist includes a list of essential tasks to be completed prior to the enterprise application selection and implementation project.

    • EAS Readiness Assessment Checklist

    3. ERP/HRIS/CRM Requirements Templates – a set of templates to help build a list of requirements and features for the selection process.

    These templates are specific to either ERP, HRIS, or CRM. Each template lists out a set of modules and features allowing you to easily build your requirements.

    • ERP Requirements Template
    • HRIS Requirements Template
    • CRM Requirements Template

    4. Vendor Solicitation (RFP) to Evaluation Suite of Tools – Use Info-Tech’s RFP, vendor response and evaluation tools and templates to increase your efficiency in your RFP and evaluation process.

    Configure this time-saving suite of tools to your organizational culture, needs, and most importantly the desired outcome of your RFP initiative.

    • EAS Request for Proposal Template
    • EAS Vendor Response Template
    • ERP Vendor Demonstration Script Template
    • HRIS Vendor Demonstration Script Template
    • CRM Vendor Demonstration Script Template
    • EAS RFP and Demonstration Scoring Tool
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Select an Enterprise Application

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Workshop debrief – Prepare for implementation

    The Purpose

    Review evaluation framework.

    Prepare for implementation.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Activities

    1.1 Support the project team in establishing the evaluation framework.

    1.2 Discuss demo scripts scenarios.

    1.3 Discuss next steps and key items in preparation for the implementation.

    Outputs

    Evaluation framework considerations.

    Demo script considerations.

    RFP considerations.

    2 Workshop Preparation

    The Purpose

    The facilitator works with the team to verify organizational readiness for EAS project and form the EAS project team.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Level-set on organizational readiness for EAS

    Organizational project alignment

    Activities

    2.1 Introduce the workshop and complete an overview of activities.

    2.2 Complete organizational context assessment to level-set understanding.

    2.3 Complete EAS readiness assessment.

    2.4 Form EAS selection team.

    Outputs

    EAS readiness assessment

    Structured EAS selection team

    3 Mapping Capabilities to Prioritizing Requirements

    The Purpose

    Determine the business capabilities and process impacted by the EAS.

    Determine what the business needs to get out of the EAS solution.

    Build the selection roadmap and project plan.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Business and ERP solution alignment

    Activities

    3.1 Map business capabilities/processes.

    3.2 Inventory application and data flow.

    3.3 List EAS requirements.

    3.4 Prioritize EAS requirements.

    Outputs

    Business capability/process map

    List or map of application + data flow

    Prioritized EAS requirements

    4 Vendor Landscape and your RFP

    The Purpose

    Understand EAS market product offerings.

    Readying key RFP aspects and expected vendor responses.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Shortlist of vendors to elicit RFP response.

    Translated EAS requirements into RFP.

    Activities

    4.1 Build RFP.

    4.2 Build vendor response template.

    Outputs

    Draft of RFP template.

    Draft of vendor response template.

    5 How to Evaluate Vendors

    The Purpose

    Prepare for demonstration and evaluation.

    Establish evaluation criteria.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Narrow your options for ERP selection to best-fit vendors.

    Activities

    5.1 Run an RFP evaluation simulation.

    5.2 Establish evaluation criteria.

    5.3 Customize the RFP and Demonstration and Scoring Tool.

    Outputs

    Draft of demo script template.

    Draft of evaluation criteria.

    Draft of RFP and Demonstration and Scoring Tool.

    Further reading

    Select an Enterprise Application

    Selecting a best-fit solution requires balancing needs, cost, and vendor capability.

    Analyst Perspective

    A foundational EAS strategy is critical to decision-making.

    Enterprise application software (EAS) is a core tool that a business leverages to accomplish its goals. An EAS that is doing its job well is invisible to the business. The challenges come when the tool is no longer invisible. It has become a source of friction in the functioning of the business.

    EAS systems are expensive, their benefits are difficult to quantify, and they often suffer from poor user satisfaction. Post-implementation, technology evolves, organizational goals change, and the health of the system is not monitored. This is complicated in today’s digital landscape with multiple integration points, siloed data, and competing priorities.

    Too often organizations jump into selecting replacement systems without understanding the needs of the organization. Alignment between business and IT is just one part of the overall strategy. Identifying key pain points and opportunities, assessed in the light of organizational strategy, will provide a strong foundation to the transformation of the EAS system. Learning about different vendor product offerings with a rigorous approach and evaluation framework will pave way for a better selection outcome.

    Hong Kwok, Research Director

    Hong Kwok
    Research Director
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge Common Obstacles Info-Tech’s Approach
    Selecting and implementing an EAS is one of the most expensive and time-consuming technology transformations an organization can undertake. EAS projects are notorious for time and budget overruns, with only a margin of the anticipated benefits being realized. Making the wrong technology selection or failing to plan for an EAS implementation has significant – and possibly career-ending – implications.

    The EAS technology market is so vast that it is nearly impossible to know where to start or how to differentiate between vendors and products.

    Inadequate and incomplete requirements skew the EAS selection in one direction to another. Many EAS projects fail due to a lack of clear description and specification of functional requirements.

    Organizations rarely have both the sufficient knowledge and resources to properly evaluate, select, and implement an EAS, forcing them to turn to external partnerships.

    EAS selection must be driven by your organization’s overall strategy. Ensure you are ready to embark on this journey with the right resources.

    Determine what EAS solution fits your organization through a structured requirement gathering process to a vendor evaluation framework.

    Ensure strong points of integration between EAS and other software such as ERP to HRIS. No EAS should live in isolation.

    Info-Tech Insight
    Accountability for EAS success is shared between IT and the business. There is no single owner of an EAS. A unified approach to building your strategy promotes an integrated roadmap so all stakeholders have clear direction on the future state.

    You are not just picking a piece of software, you are choosing a long-term technology partner

    Reasons for Selectin Chosen Software

    Decision making in selection often stands on functional fit; don’t forget to consider vendor fit.

    As the ERP technology market becomes increasingly saturated and difficult to decode, vendors are trying to get ahead by focusing on building a partnership, not just making a sale.

    68 % of organizations are satisfied with the overall ERP vendor experience, up from 54% in 2017.

    Panorama Consulting Solutions, “Report,” 2018

    What is an Enterprise Application?

    Our Definition: Enterprise Application Software (EAS) is a large software system that provides a broad and integrated set of features which supports a range of business operations and processes across an organization. The system is broadly deployed, provides a unified interface and data structure, allowing for higher business productivity and reporting efficiencies. Best known EAS solutions include Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP), Human Resource Information System (HRIS), and Customer Relationship Management (CRM).

    More focused EAS solutions may also bring benefits to your organization, depending on the scale of operations, complexity of operations, and functions. Here are some examples:

    PSA: Professional Services Automation
    SCMS: Supply Chain Management System
    WMS: Warehouse Management System
    EAM: Enterprise Asset Management
    PIMS: Product Information Management System
    MES: Manufacturing Execution System
    MA: Marketing Automation

    Our other Selection Framework

    When selecting personal or commodity applications, or mid-tier applications with spend below $100,000, use our Rapid Application Selection Framework.

    Download this tool

    Enterprise Applications Lifecycle Advisory Services

    Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)

    Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)

    What is EPR

    Enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems facilitate the flow of information across business units. They allow for the seamless integration of systems and create a holistic view of the enterprise to support decision making.

    In many organizations, the ERP system is considered the lifeblood of the enterprise. Problems with this key operational system will have a dramatic impact on the ability of the enterprise to survive and grow.

    An ERP system:

    • Automates processes, reducing the amount of manual, routine work.
    • Integrates with core modules, eliminating the fragmentation of systems.
    • Centralizes information for reporting from multiple parts of the value chain to a single point.
    ERP use cases: Product-centric
    Suitable for organizations that manufacture, assemble, distribute, or manage material goods.
    Service-centric
    Suitable for organizations that provide and manage field services and/or professional services.

    Human Resource Information System (HRIS)

    What is HRIS?

    An HRIS is used to acquire, store, manipulate, analyze, retrieve, and distribute information regarding an organization’s human resources. HRIS covers the entire employee lifecycle from recruit to retire.

    An HRIS:

    • Retains employee data in a single repository.
    • Enhances employee engagement through self-service and visibility into their records.
    • Enhances data security through role-based access control.
    • Eliminates manual processes and enables workflow automation.
    • Reduces transaction processing time and HR administrative tasks.
    • Presents an end-to-end, comprehensive view of all HR processes.
    • Reduces exposure to risk with compliance to rules and regulations.
    • Enhances the business’s reporting capability on various aspects of human capital.

    Human Resource Information System

    Customer relationship management (CRM)

    What is CRM?

    A CRM platform (or suite) is a core enterprise application that provides a broad feature set for supporting customer interaction processes, typically across marketing, sales and customer service. These suites supplant more basic applications for customer interaction management (such as the contact management module of an ERP or office productivity suite).

    A CRM suite provides many key capabilities, including but not limited to:

    • Account management
    • Order history tracking
    • Pipeline management
    • Case management
    • Campaign management
    • Reports and analytics
    • Customer journey execution

    A CRM provides a host of native capabilities, but many organizations elect to tightly integrate their CRM solution with other parts of their customer experience ecosystem to provide a 360-degree view of their customers.

    Customer relationship management

    The good EAS numbers

    There are many good reasons to support EAS implementation and use.

    92% of organizations report that CRM use is important for accomplishing revenue objectives.
    Source: Validity, 2020

    Almost 26% of companies implement HRIS is to obtain greater functionalities, while other main reasons are to increase efficiencies, support growth, and consolidate systems.
    Source: SoftwarePath, 2022

    Functionality of an ERP is believed to be the most important aspect by almost 40% of companies.
    Source: SelectHub, 2022

    The ugly EAS numbers

    Risks are high in EAS projects.

    Statistical analysis of ERP projects indicates rates of failure vary from 50 to 70 percent. Taking the low end of those analyst reports, one in two ERP projects is considered a failure.
    Source: Electric Journal of Information Systems Evaluation.

    46% of HR technology projects exceed their planned timelines.
    Source: Unleash, 2020

    Almost 70% of all CRM implementation projects do not meet expected objectives.
    Source: Future Computing and Informatics Journal

    Enterprise Application dissatisfaction

    Finance, IT, Sales, HR, and other users of the Enterprise Application system can only optimize with the full support of each other. Cooperation between departments is crucial when trying to improve the technology capabilities and customer interaction.

    Drivers of Dissatisfaction
    Business Data People and teams Technology
    • Misaligned objectives
    • Product fit
    • Changing priorities
    • Lack of metrics
    • Access to data
    • Data hygiene
    • Data literacy
    • One view of the customer
    • User adoption
    • Lack of IT support
    • Training (use of data and system)
    • Vendor relations
    • Systems integration
    • Multi-channel complexity
    • Capability shortfall
    • Lack of product support

    Info-Tech Insight
    While technology is the key enabler of building strong customer experiences, there are many other drivers of dissatisfaction. IT must stand shoulder-to-shoulder with the business to develop a technology framework for Enterprise Applications.

    Case Study

    Align strategy and technology to meet consumer demand.

    NETFLIX

    INDUSTRY
    Entertainment

    SOURCE
    Forbes, 2017

    Challenge
    Beginning as a mail-out service, Netflix offered subscribers a catalog of videos to select from and have mailed to them directly. Customers no longer had to go to a retail store to rent a video. However, the lack of immediacy of direct mail as the distribution channel resulted in slow adoption.

    Blockbuster was the industry leader in video retail but was lagging in its response to industry, consumer, and technology trends around customer experience.

    Solution
    In response to the increasing presence of tech-savvy consumers on the internet, Netflix invested in developing an online platform as its primary distribution channel. The benefit of doing so was two-fold: passive brand advertising (by being present on the internet) and meeting customer demands for immediacy and convenience. Netflix also recognized the rising demand for personalized service and created an unprecedented, tailored customer experience.

    Results
    Netflix’s disruptive innovation is built on the foundation of great customer experience management. Netflix is now a $28 billion company, which is ten times what Blockbuster was worth.

    Netflix used disruptive technologies to innovatively build a customer experience that put it ahead of the long-time video rental industry leader, Blockbuster.

    Info-Tech’s methodology for selecting an Enterprise Application

    1. Build alignment and assemble the team 2. Define your EAS 3. Engage, evaluate, and select 4. Next steps
    Phase steps
    1. Aligning business and IT
    2. Readiness and resourcing
    1. Map capabilities
    2. List Requirements
    3. Prioritize requirements
    1. Know the products
    2. Engage the vendors
    3. Select properly
    1. Plan for implementation
    Phase outcomes Discuss organizational goals and how to advance those using the EA system. Identify gaps and remediation steps in preparation of the selection. Assemble the EA selection team. List and review business capabilities and translate into EAS requirements. Prioritize requirements for selection. Gain an understanding of the product offerings on the market. Engage the vendors through RFPs and conduct a proper evaluation with an objective evaluation criteria and framework. Review and discuss the different elements required in preparation for the implementation project.

    Blueprint deliverables

    Each step of this blueprint is accompanied by supporting deliverables to help you accomplish your goals:

    ERP/HRIS/CRM Requirements Template

    ERP Requirements Template

    Accelerate your requirement gathering with a pre-compiled list of common requirements.

    RFx Demo Scoring Tool

    RFx Demo Scoring Tool

    Quickly compare the vendors who respond to the RFx to identify the best fit for your needs.

    Key deliverable:

    RFx templates

    Use one of our templates to build a ready-for-distribution implementation partner RFx tailored to the unique success factors of your implementation.

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit Guided Implementation Workshop Consulting
    "Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful." "Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track." "We need to his the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place." "Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project."

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks are used throughout all four options

    Guided Implementation

    A Guided Implementation (GI) is a series of calls with an Info-Tech analyst to help implement our best practices in your organization.

    A typical GI is between six to ten calls over the course of four to six months.

    What does a typical GI on this topic look like?

    Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4

    Call #1: Scoping call to understand the current situation.

    Call #2: Discuss readiness and resourcing needs.

    Call #3: Discuss the capabilities and application inventory.

    Call #4: Discuss requirement gathering and prioritization.

    Call #5: Go over SoftwareReviews and review draft RFx.

    Call #6: Discuss evaluation tool and evaluation process.

    Call #7: Discuss preparation for implementation.

    Workshop Overview

    Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5
    Activities

    Organizational Strategic Needs

    1.1 Review the business context.

    1.2 Overview of the EAS Landscape

    1.2 Assess EAS project readiness

    1.3 Determine the members of the EAS selection team

    From Capabilities to Requirements

    2.1 Map business capabilities

    2.2 Inventory application and interactions

    2.3 Gather requirements

    2.4 Prioritize requirements

    Vendor Landscape and Your RFP

    3.1 Understanding product offerings

    3.2 Build a list of targeted vendors

    3.3 Build RFP

    3.4 Build vendor response template

    How to Evaluate Vendors

    4.1 Run a RFP evaluation simulation

    4.2 Build demo script

    4.3 Establish evaluation criteria

    Next Steps and Wrap-Up (offsite)

    5.1 Clean up in-progress deliverables from previous four days.

    5.2 Set up review time for workshop deliverables and to discuss next steps.

    Deliverables
    1. EAS Readiness Checklist and remediation plan
    2. List of members in EAS selection team
    1. List of key business processes
    2. Inventory application and data flow map
    3. Prioritized EAS requirements
    1. Draft RFP template
    2. Draft vendor response template
    1. Draft demo script template
    2. Draft vendor evaluation tool
    1. Completed RFP template
    2. Completed vendor response template
    3. Completed demo script template
    4. Vendor evaluation plan

    Contact your account representative for more information.
    workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8889

    Phase 1

    Build alignment and assemble the Team

    Phase 1
    1.1 Enterprise Application Landscape
    1.2 Validate Readiness
    1.3 Determine Resourcing

    Phase 2
    1.1 Capability Mapping
    1.2 Requirements Gathering Data Mapping
    1.3 Requirements Prioritizing

    Phase 3
    3.1 Understanding Product Offerings
    3.2 RFP & Demo Scripts
    3.3 Evaluation
    Select and Negotiate

    Phase 4
    4.1 Prepare for Implementation

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    Gain an understanding of recent EAS technology.

    Validate readiness before starting EAS selection.

    Assemble EAS selection team through identification of key players.

    This phase involves the following participants:

    Key stakeholders from the various areas of the business that will support the project, including:

    • CxO (e.g. CIO, CFO)
    • Departmental leaders
    • Project management team
    • Subject matter experts

    Select an Enterprise Application

    Create a compelling case that addresses strategic business objectives

    When someone at the organization asks you WHY, you need to deliver a compelling case. The ERP project will receive pushback, doubt, and resistance; if you can’t answer the question WHY, you will be left back-peddling.

    When faced with a challenge, prepare for the WHY.

    • Why do we need this?
    • Why are we spending all this money?
    • Why are we bothering?
    • Why is this important?
    • Why did we do it this way?
    • Why did we choose this vendor?

    Most organizations can answer “What?”

    Some organizations can answer “How?”

    Very few organizations have an answer for “Why?”

    Each stage of the project will be difficult and present its own unique challenges and failure points. Re-evaluate if you lose sight of WHY at any stage in the project.

    Ensure you have completed the necessary prerequisites for EAS selection

    Prior to embarking on selection, ensure you have set the right building blocks and completed the necessary prerequisites: your strategy and roadmap, and business case.

    STRATEGY & ROADMAP
    Whatever EAS is required, take the time to align your strategy and roadmap to business priorities. Right-size a technology strategy by assessing deployment model alternatives and future-state options with your EAS vision, operating model, and current-state assessment as inputs. Put your strategy to action with a living roadmap by following Info-Tech’s blueprint, Develop an Actionable Strategy and Roadmap.

    EAS BUSINESS CASE
    Use a business case to justify the business need for your EAS project and secure funding for moving forward with the proposal. A business case will further provide executive decision makers with the tools to compare and prioritize initiatives. Drive a consistent approach to promoting successful initiatives and holding the organization accountable to the projected benefits with Info-Tech’s blueprint, Reduce Time to Consensus With an Accelerated Business Case.

    Align the EAS strategy with the corporate strategy

    Corporate strategy Unified strategy EAS strategy
    • Conveys the current state of the organization and the path it wants to take.
    • Identifies future goals and business aspirations.
    • Communicates the initiatives that are critical for getting the organization from its current state to the future state.
    • EAS optimization can be and should be linked, with metrics, to the corporate strategy and ultimate business objectives.
    • Communicates the organization’s budget and spending on EAS.
    • Identifies IT initiatives that will support the business and key EAS objectives.
    • Outlines staffing and resourcing for EAS initiatives.

    Info-Tech Insight
    EAS projects are more successful when the management team understands the strategic importance and the criticality of alignment. Time needs to be spent upfront aligning business strategies with EAS capabilities. Effective alignment between IT and the business should happen daily. Alignment doesn’t just to occur at the executive level alone, but at each level of the organization.

    Understand how EAS fits into your wider IT organization

    Identify the IT drivers and opportunities to take advantage of when embarking on your EAS project.

    Greenfield or brownfield: Do you currently have an EAS? Do you have multiple EASs? What is the history of your EAS deployment? How customized is it?

    End of life: What lifecycle stage is it in?

    Utilization: Are there point solutions in your application portfolio that support some EAS capabilities? Is functionality duplicated and/or underutilized?

    Reason for change: What are your organizational drivers for this EAS project (e.g. acquisition/merger)?

    APPLICATION PORTFOLIO STRATEGY

    Business leaders need application managers to do more than support business operations. Applications must drive business growth, and application managers need their portfolios to be current and effective and to evolve continuously to support the business or risk being marginalized. Rationalize your applications with a roadmap that propels the business forward.

    Go to this link

    Before switching vendors, evaluate your existing EAS to see if it’s being underutilized or could use an upgrade

    The cost of switching vendors can be challenging, but it will depend entirely on the quality of data and whether it makes sense to keep it.

    • Achieving success when switching vendors first requires reflection. We need to ask why we are dissatisfied with our incumbent software.
    • If the product is old and inflexible, the answer may be obvious, but don’t be afraid to include your incumbent in your evaluation if your issues might be solved with an upgrade.
    • Look at your use-case requirements to see where you want to take the EAS solution and compare them to your incumbent’s roadmap. If they don’t match, switching vendors may be the only solution. If your roadmaps align, see if you’re fully leveraging the solution or will be able to start working through process improvements

    Fully leveraging your current software now will have two benefits:

    1 It may turn out that poor leveraging of your incumbent software was the problem all along; switching vendors won’t solve the problem by itself. As the data to the right shows, a fifth of SMEs and a quarter of large enterprises do not fully leverage their incumbent software.
    2 If you still decide to switch, you’ll be in a good negotiating position. If vendors can see you are engaged and fully leveraging your software, they will be less complacent during negotiations to win you over.
    20%
    Small/Medium
    Enterprises
    25%
    Large
    Enterprises
    only occasionally or rarely/never use their software

    Source: SoftwareReviews, 2020; N=45,027

    Info-Tech Insight
    Switching vendors won’t improve poor internal processes. To be fully successful and meet the goals of the business case, new software implementations must be accompanied by process review and improvement.

    Familiarize yourself with the EAS market

    How it got here Where it’s going
    • Acquisition and consolidation: The major vendors in the industry have grown over time through acquisition, particularly focusing on expanding products in industrial verticals.
    • Product stack: What it means is having to navigate complexity related to the product stack when thinking about EAS, which turns the conversation from EAS as a single product to EAS as a package of multiple products.
    • Modularity and interoperability: The benefit of the stack is that it often means modularity and the ability to implement parts of a solution or in an order that aligns to the customer’s needs. On the other hand, the stack is not always understood by or well communicated to the customer, and the interdependence of components often means they must be licensed together.
    • Customizable cloud: Software-as-a-Service in multitenant environments offers a hands-off value proposition, but increasingly customers are looking to customize their instances beyond the capability offered through configurability.
    • Best-of-breed consolidation: EAS vendors are continuing to consolidate functionality to increase interoperability and increase ease of integration. The market is rife with acquisitions and mergers, making the strong players even stronger.
    • Client experience: While most vendors now offer products that will meet the wide gamut of EAS business requirements, vendors are now paying extra attention to the client experience from partnership perspective.

    Info-Tech Insight
    Evaluating the EAS vendor landscape is becoming increasingly difficult as the playing field evens out in terms of functionality offerings. As such, it is becoming increasingly important to more meticulously evaluate vendors themselves as part of the selection process. This is especially important in EAS projects, as they tend to be multi-year in nature and result in long-term vendor partnerships.

    What types of Enterprise solutions are at my disposal?

    IT leaders typically compare EAS on-premises with SaaS options, but there are actually four different deployment scenarios.

    1. On Premises 3. Proprietary Cloud 4. White-Label Cloud 2. SaaS
    • The traditional model for EAS deployment.
    • Upfront licensing term plus annual maintenance/ support fee.
    • Requires local server, database, and authentication.
    • Good support for industry modules.
    • Customizable.
    • EAS vendor hosts an instance of the EAS system in its own data center.
    • Patches may or may not be applied automatically.
    • Monthly per-user or traditional billing.
    • Otherwise, as with on premises.
    • EAS VAR or reseller hosts an instance of the EAS system in its own data center or in a public IaaS provider’s (e.g. Rackspace, Amazon EC2).
    • Otherwise, as with proprietary cloud.
    • Common model for cloud EAS.
    • All users share a single instance.
    • Patches and updates are applied automatically.
    • Monthly per-user fee.
    • Poor industry support.
    • Configurable but not customizable.

    Info-Tech Insight
    Cloud may apply in other ways to the EAS implementation. Most vendors offer particular EAS services delivered via the cloud. For example, some vendors offers CRM, project management, and payroll self-service as cloud-based options to augment on-premises ERP solutions.

    Know when to adopt and when to bypass cloud EAS

    Use the following guidelines to determine if your organization will benefit from the cloud, or if you should stick to a more traditional delivery model.

    Adopt a cloud-based EAS platform if you have: Do not adopt a cloud-based EAS platform if you have:
    Standard processes – Businesses that have standard, repeatable processes can benefit greatly from the cost savings that cloud provides, as the need for expensive customizations is greatly minimized. Highly regulated industry – Although there is no hard evidence that says cloud-based solutions are not able to support security or compliance needs, in certain industries such as banking or insurance, cloud is not the norm and may be a tough sell for IT.
    Lean IT operations – Organizations with lean IT or no formal IT departments supporting them will find SaaS EAS particularly appealing. Those with IT that can support day-to-day operations but are not prepared for disaster recovery should also consider cloud EAS, either hosted or SaaS-based. Unreliable network – If the business regularly faces network outages or remote employees have unreliable internet connections, a cloud-based solution may not be the best option. IT would face many complaints from disgruntled workers unable to access data.
    Mobile workforce – Telecommuting is becoming more common, as is the requirement for data to be readily available for those on the road. Using cloud is a good way to provide this functionality. Unsavvy workforce – Organizations that prefer to be late adopters of technology may face strong resistance to taking their software to the cloud. Some employees may not like the idea of using a browser to connect to the system.

    Info-Tech Insight
    Knowing when to choose a cloud EAS deployment comes down to two main factors: knowing the level of complexity required by the business, and knowing the available IT resources that can be dedicated to support and manage EAS.

    Consider 3 classic scenarios when evaluating cloud EAS

    Cloud EAS should be considered by all organizations, but these scenarios present the strongest opportunity.

    The Startup The Spinoff The Modernizer
    • There is no greenfield in ERP, but if you’re a startup, you’re quite close.
    • Given the virtually nonexistent IT department in startups, having an on-premises ERP can be daunting. A SaaS delivery model is usually the best choice in these scenarios. Even if the resources are available, they are better spent driving business growth.
    • Startups typically have less stringent industry requirements, making SaaS a more attractive option.
    • Though not entirely new companies, spinoffs or subsidiaries often have needs similar to those of startups but with an added integration requirement.
    • When it comes to ERP, the deployment type will depend on how resources are split with the parent company. If there is little to no IT support, then SaaS is ideal.
    • If the parent company is already using cloud ERP, whether SaaS, hosted, or an internal cloud, then it is often easy for the spinoff to gain access as well.
    • Companies with legacy systems that are not salvageable, or out-of-date point solutions that do not scale, have the opportunity to start from scratch.
    • Those looking at reducing capital expenses should consider SaaS and hosted ERP deployments.
    • Those looking at having state-of-the-art technology in-house should consider building an internal private cloud that supports their ERP deployment.

    Make sure you are ready to proceed with selection

    Organizational readiness is essential for maximizing the benefits realized from your ERP. Cover all critical elements of pre-work, resources, buy-in, and strategy and planning before embarking on ERP selection and/or implementation.

    Pre-work
    Current State Understanding
    Business Process Improvement
    Future State Vision

    Resources
    Project Team
    Governance Structures
    Third-Party Partners
    Cost and Budget

    Buy-in
    Goals and Objectives
    Exec Business Sponsorship
    Stakeholder Engagement
    Change Management

    STRATEGY and PLANNING
    ERP Strategy & Roadmap
    Risk Management
    Project Metrics

    Without a preparedness assessment, organizations end up wasting a lot of time on resolving gaps in planning that could have been mitigated upfront, which ultimately makes the implementation project more challenging.
    – Suanne McGrath-Kelly, President & Principal Consultant, Plan in Motion Inc., interviewed by Info-Tech, 2019.

    Assess your EAS readiness before moving forward

    To avoid common project pitfalls, complete the necessary prerequisites before proceeding with EAS. Consider whether the risks of proceeding unprepared fall within your organization’s risk tolerance. If they do not, pivot back to strategy.

    Preceding tasks Risks of proceeding unprepared
    Project Vision
    Project Scope
    EAS Business Case
    Current State Map
    Improvement Opportunity Analysis
    Future State Considerations
    Strategic Requirements
    Project Metrics and Benchmarks
    Risk Assessment
    EAS Strategic Roadmap
    EAS Project Work Initiatives
    Misalignment of project objectives
    Time and cost overruns
    Lack of executive buy-in or support
    Over- or under-investment in systems
    Unknown and unmet system requirements
    Product selection misfit
    Misalignment of requirements to needs
    Inability to measure project success
    Inability to proactively mitigate risk impact
    Lack of decision-making traceability
    Unclear expectations of tasks and roles

    1.2.1 Assess EAS selection readiness

    1 – 2 hours

    1. As a group, review Section 1 of the EAS Readiness Assessment Checklist with the core project team and/or project sponsor, item by item. For completed items, tick the corresponding checkbox. Document all incomplete items in the Readiness Remediation Plan table in the first column (“Incomplete Readiness Item”).
    2. For each incomplete item, use your discretion to determine whether the completion is critical in preparation for EAS selection and implementation. This may vary given the complexity of your EAS project. If the item is critical to the project, indicate this with “Y” in the second column (“Criticality (Y/N)”).
    3. For each critical item, reflect on the barriers that have prevented or are preventing its completion. Possible barriers include incomplete task dependencies, low value to effort determination, lack of organizational knowledge or resources, pressure of deadlines, etc. Document these barriers in the third column (“Barriers to Completion”).
    4. Determine a remediation approach for each barrier identified. Document the approach in the fourth column (“Remediation Approach”).
      1. For each remediation activity, designate a due date and remediation owner. Document this in the fifth column (“Due Date and Owner”).
      2. Carry out the remediation of critical tasks and return to this blueprint to kick-start your selection and implementation project.
    Input Output
    • EAS Foundation
    • EAS Strategy
    • Readiness remediation approach
    • Validation of ERP project readiness
    Materials Participants
    • EAS Readiness Assessment Checklist
    • Project sponsor
    • Core project team

    Download the EAS Readiness Assessment Checklist

    Build a well-balanced core team to see the project through

    Have a cross-departmental team define goals and objectives in order to significantly increase EAS success and improve communication.

    • Hold a meeting with Finance, Operations, and IT stakeholders. The overall objective of the meeting is to confirm that all parties agree on the goals and metrics that gauge success of the EAS project.
    • The kick-off process will significantly improve internal communications. Invite all impacted internal groups to work as a team to address any significant issues before the application process is formally activated.
    • Set up a quarterly review process to understand changing needs. This will change the way the EAS system will be utilized.

    “Each individual should understand at least one business area and have a hand in another.”
    – Mark Earley
    Senior Research Director,
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Info-Tech Insight
    An EAS selection and implementation requires more than just a procurement team. The core EAS project team should be cross-functional. .

    Be ready with a resourcing strategy for your EAS project

    EAS selection and implementation is a giant undertaking that can rarely be supported by internal resources alone.

    It is important to understand where your organization’s resourcing gaps are when embarking on a selection and implementation project. Once gaps are identified, the amount of external support needed from vendor(s), consultants, or system integrators can be determined.

    Select from the three most commonly used resourcing strategies for EAS selection and implementation projects:

    • Implement in-house using your own staff.
    • Implement using a combination of your own staff and professional services from the vendor(s) and/or system integrator (SI).
    • Implement using professional services.

    Build your implementation team

    Prioritize members from your core selection team. They will have strong insight into the tool and its envisioned position in the organization.

    General Roles

    1. Integration Specialists
    2. Solution or Enterprise Architects
    3. QA Engineer
    4. IT Service Management Team

    External Roles

    1. Vendor’s Implementation Team or Professional Services
    2. Systems Integrator (SI)

    Right-size the EAS selection team to ensure you get the right information but are still able to move ahead quickly

    Full-Time Resourcing: At least one member of these five team members must be allocated to the selection initiative as a full-time resource.

    IT Leader Technical Lead Business Analyst/
    Project Manager
    Business Lead Process Expert(s)
    This team member is an IT director or CIO who will provide sponsorship and oversight from the IT perspective. This team member will focus on application security, integration, and enterprise architecture. This team member elicits business needs and translates them into technology requirements. This team member will provide sponsorship from the business needs perspective. Typically, a CXO or SVP of a business function. These team members are the business process owners who will help steer the requirements and direction.

    Info-Tech Insight
    It is critical for the selection team to determine who has decision rights. Organizational culture will play the largest role in dictating which team member holds the final say for selection decisions. For more information on stakeholder management and involvement, see this guide.

    Complete the project timeline required during your selection phase

    Include as many steps as necessary to understand, validate, and compare vendor solutions so you can make a confident, well-informed decision.

    Use Info-Tech’s 15-Step Selection Process:

    1. Initiate procurement.
    2. Select procurement manager.
    3. Prepare for procurement; check that prerequisites are met.
    4. Select appropriate procurement vehicle (RFI, RFP, RFQ, etc.).
    5. Assemble procurement teams.
    6. Create procurement project plan.
    7. Identify and notify vendors about procurement.
    8. Configure procurement process.
    9. Gather requirements.
    10. Prioritize requirements.
    11. Build the procurement documentation package.
    12. Issue the procurement.
    13. Evaluate proposals.
    14. Evaluate vendor demos and reference checks.
    15. Recommend a vendor.

    Strengthen your procurement. If your organization lacks a clear selection process, refer to Info-Tech's Implement a Proactive and Consistent Vendor Selection Process research to help construct a formal process for procuring application technology.

    Download the Implement a Proactive and Consistent Vendor Selection Process

    Visualize what success looks like

    Understand how success metrics are relevant at each stage of strategy formation by keeping the end in mind. Apply a similar thought model to your other success metrics for a holistic evaluation of your strategy.

    Implementation
    Pre-Implementation Post-Implementation
    Baseline measure Strategic insight Strategic action Success measure End result
    Use data you already have. Any given pain point can act as your pre-implementation baseline. Previously, this measure may have been evaluated by asking “what?” or “how much?” Move away from looking at your baseline measure as transactional data, and incorporate the ability to generate strategic insight with your EAS. Change the questions you are asking to drive insights: “who?” “why?” and “how does it affect the business?” Support the business by putting your strategic analytics into action. Ensure there are capabilities built into your ERP to strategically address your baseline measure. Leverage these functions to act on your strategic insights. In the interest of IT and business alignment, speak the same language when measuring success. Use a business success measurement to determine the contribution made by your EAS strategy. Visualize your success in the context of the business as a whole. Projecting success in the interest of your stakeholders will gain and maintain buy-in, allowing you to leverage the strategic functionality of your new EAS.
    Example Time to Procure Delay in time to procure caused by bottleneck in requisition processing ERP used to create advanced workflows to streamline requisition approval process Time efficiencies gained free up employee time to focus on more strategic efforts Contributed to strategic operational innovation

    Prove the value of your EAS through metrics

    Establish baseline metrics early and measure throughout the project can iteratively prove the value of your EAS.

    Functional processes IT resource efficiency
    Functional benefits and efficiencies gained through effectively diagnosing and meeting business needs. Benefits enabled through reductions in IT system, network, and resource usage.
    Example metrics Record to report
    • Days to close month-end
    • Time to produce statements
    Market to order
    • Customer retention rate
    • Conversion/Cost per lead
    • Number of help desk requests
    • Number of active users
    • Time to resolution
    Quote to cash
    • Sales cycle duration
    • Cash conversion cycle
    Issue to resolution
    • # of returns
    • # of customer complaints
    • Time to resolve complaints
    Procure to pay
    • Average time to procure
    • Cycle time of purchase order
    Forecast to delivery
    • Variance of demand plan
    • Time to replenish inventory
    Plan to perform
    • Time to complete plan
    • Variance of plan to actual
    Hire to retire
    • Training $ per employee
    • Total overtime cost

    Improve baseline metrics through…

    1. Increased help desk efficiency. Through training of personnel and increased efficiency of processes.
    2. Increased level of self-service for end users. Implementation of functionality that matches business needs will increase the efficiency of functional business tasks.
    3. Decreased time to escalation. Knowing when to escalate tasks sooner can decrease wasted effort by tier-one workers.
    4. Automation of simple, repetitive tasks. Automation frees time for more important tasks.

    1.3.1 Assemble EAS selection team

    1 hour

    1. Working as a group, list key players in the organization that should be in EAS selection team.
    2. Determine the role of each member.
    3. Define the level of commitment each member can have on the EAS selection team. Keep in mind their availabilities during the selection process.
    4. Determine who has decision rights.
    Input Output
    • Knowledge of the team, governance structure, and organizational culture
    • List members in EAS selection team
    Materials Participants
    • Sticky notes
    • Markers
    • Executive sponsor
    • Core project team

    Phase 2

    Define your EAS

    Phase 1
    1.1 Enterprise Application Landscape
    1.2 Validate Readiness
    1.3 Determine Resourcing

    Phase 2
    2.1 Capability Mapping
    2.2 Requirements Gathering Data Mapping
    2.3 Requirements Prioritizing

    Phase 3
    3.1 Understanding Product Offerings
    3.2 RFP & Demo Scripts
    3.3 Evaluation
    Select and Negotiate

    Phase 4
    4.1 Prepare for
    Implementation

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    Identifying business processes , inventory applications and data flows, gathering requirements and prioritizing them.

    This phase involves the following participants:

    Key stakeholders from the various areas of the business that will support the project including:

    • CxO (e.g. CIO, CFO)
    • Departmental leaders
    • Project management team
    • Subject matter experts
    • Core project team

    Select an Enterprise Application

    Leverage Info-Tech’s requirements gathering framework to serve as the basis for capturing your CRM requirements

    Requirements Gathering Framework

    Info-Tech’s Requirements Gathering Framework is a comprehensive approach to requirements management that can be scaled to any size of project or organization. This framework ensures that the application created will capture the needs of all stakeholders and deliver business value. Don’t treat elicitation, analysis, and validation in isolation: planning, monitoring, communicating, and managing must permeate all three stages in order to avoid makeshift solutions.

    Capability vs. process vs. feature

    Understanding the difference

    When examining HRMS optimization it is important to approach it from the appropriate layer.

    Capability:

    • The ability of an entity (e.g. organization or department) to achieve its objectives (APQC, 2017).
    • An ability that an organization, person, or system possesses. They are typically expressed in general and high-level terms and typically require a combination of organization, people, processes, and technology to achieve (TOGAF).

    Process:

    • Processes can be manual or technology enabled. A process is a series of interrelated activities that convert inputs into results (outputs).
    • Processes consume resources, require standards for repeatable performance, and respond to control systems that direct the quality, rate, and cost of performance. The same process can be highly effective in one circumstance and poorly effective in another with different systems, tools, knowledge, and people (APQC, 2017).

    Feature:

    • A distinguishing characteristic of a software item (e.g. performance, portability, or functionality) (IEEE, 2005).

    In today’s complex organizations, it can be difficult to understand where inefficiencies stem from and how performance can be enhanced.

    To fix problems and maximize efficiencies, organizations must examine business capabilities and processes to determine gaps and areas of lagging performance.

    Info-Tech’s HRIS framework and industry tools such as the APQC’s Process Classification Framework can help make sense of this.

    Process inventory

    Business capability map (Level 0)

    Business Capability Map

    If you do not have a documented process model, you can use the APQC Framework to help define your inventory of business processes.
    APQC’s Process Classification Framework is a taxonomy of cross-functional business processes intended to allow the objective comparison of organizational performance within and among organizations.

    In business architecture, the primary view of an organization is known as a business capability map.

    A business capability defines what a business does to enable value creation rather than how.

    Business capabilities:

    • Represent stable business functions.
    • Are unique and independent of each other.
    • Will typically have a defined business outcome.

    A business capability map provides details that help the business architecture practitioner direct attention to a specific area of the business for further assessment.

    EAS process mapping

    Objectives The organization’s objectives are typically outcomes that the organization is looking to achieve as a result of the business strategy.
    Value Streams Value streams are external/internal processes that help the organization realize its goals.
    Capabilities The what: Business capabilities support value streams in the creation and capture of value.
    Processes The how: Business processes define how they will fulfill a given capability.

    The operating model

    An operating model is a framework that drives operating decisions. It helps to set the parameters for the scope of EAS and the processes that will be supported. The operating model will serve to group core operational processes. These groupings represent a set of interrelated, consecutive processes aimed at generating a common output.

    The value stream

    Value stream defined:

    Value Streams Design Product Produce Product Sell Product Customer Service
    • Manufacturers work proactively to design products and services that will meet consumer demand.
    • Products are driven by consumer demand and governmental regulations.
    • Production processes and labor costs are constantly analyzed for efficiencies and accuracies.
    • Quality of product and services are highly regulated through all levels of the supply chain.
    • Sales networks and sales staff deliver the product from the organization to the end consumer.
    • Marketing plays a key role throughout the value stream, connecting consumers’ wants and needs to the products and services offered.
    • Relationships with consumers continue after the sale of products and services.
    • Continued customer support and data mining is important to revenue streams.

    Value streams connect business goals to the organization’s value realization activities in the marketplace. Those activities are dependent on the specific industry segment in which an organization operates.

    There are two types of value streams: core and support.

    • Core value streams are mostly external-facing. They deliver value to either external or internal customers and they tie to the customer perspective of the strategy map.
    • Support value streams are internal-facing and provide the foundational support for an organization to operate.

    An effective method for ensuring all value streams have been considered is to understand that there can be different end-value receivers.

    2.1.1 List your key processes

    1-3 hours

    1. As a group, discuss the business capabilities, value streams, and business processes.
    2. For each capability determine the following:
      1. Is this capability applicable to our organization?
      2. What application, if any, supports this capability?
    3. Are there any missing capabilities to add?
    Input Output
    • Current systems
    • Key processes
    • APQC Framework
    • Organizational process map
    • List of key business processes
    Materials Participants
    • APQC Framework
    • Whiteboard, PowerPoint, or flip charts and markers
    • Primary stakeholders in each value stream supported by the EAS
    • Core project team

    Activity 2.1.1 – Process inventory

    Core finance Core HR Workforce management Talent Management Warehouse management Enterprise asset management
    Process Technology Process Technology Process Technology Process Technology Process Technology Process Technology
    • General ledger
    • Accounts payable
    • Accounts receivable
    • GL consolidation
    • Cash management
    • Billing and invoicing
    • Expenses
    • Payroll accounting
    • Tax management
    • Reporting
    • Payroll administration
    • Benefits administration
    • Position management
    • Organizational structure
    • Core HR records
    • Time and attendance
    • Leave management
    • Scheduling
    • Performance management
    • Talent acquisition
    • Offboarding & onboarding
    • Plan layout
    • Manage inventory
    • Manage loading docks
    • Pick, pack, ship
    • Plan and manage workforce
    • Manage returns
    • Transfer product cross-dock
    • Asset lifecycle management
    • Supply chain management
    • Maintenance planning and scheduling
    Planning and budgeting Strategic HR Procurement Customer relationship management Facilities management Project management
    Process Technology Process Technology Process Technology Process Technology Process Technology Process Technology
    • Budget reporting
    • Variance analysis
    • Multi-year operating plan
    • Monthly forecasting
    • Annual operating plan
    • Compensation planning
    • Workforce planning
    • Succession planning
    • Supplier management
    • Purchase order management
    • Workflow approvals
    • Contract / tender management
    • Contact management
    • Activity management
    • Analytics
    • Plan and acquire
    • Asset maintenance
    • Disposal
    • Project management
    • Project costing
    • Budget control
    • Document management

    Gaining Enterprise Architecture Oversight during application selection yields better user satisfaction results

    Procurement/Legal Oversight and
    Low satisfaction with software selection High satisfaction with software selection
    Process % Used % Used Process
    Used ROI/Cost Benefit Analysis 42% 43% Used ROI/Cost-Benefit Analysis
    Used Formal Decision Criteria 39% 41% Used Formal Decision Criteria
    Approval 33% 37% Enterprise Architecture Oversight and Approval
    Security Oversight and Approval 27% 36% Security Oversight and Approval
    Used Third-Party Data Reports 26% 28% Procurement/Legal Oversight and Approval
    Enterprise Architecture Oversight and Approval 26% 28% Used Third-Party Data Reports
    Used a Consultant 21% 17% Used a Consultant

    High satisfaction was defined as a response of 8, 9, or 10 from the overall recommendation question. Low satisfaction was 7 or less.

    Source: SoftwareReviews, 2018

    Map data flow

    Example ERP data flow

    Example ERP data flow

    When assessing the current application portfolio that supports your EAS, the tendency will be to focus on the applications under the EAS umbrella. These relate mostly to marketing, sales, and customer service. Be sure to include systems that act as input to, or benefit due to outputs from EAS or similar applications.

    Be sure to include enterprise applications that are not included in the EAS application portfolio. Popular systems to consider for POIs include billing, directory services, content management, and collaboration tools.

    Integration is paramount: your EAS application often integrates with other applications within the organization. Create an integration map to reflect a system of record and the exchange of data. To increase customer engagement, channel integration is a must (i.e. with robust links to unified communications solutions, email, and VoIP telephony systems).

    Enterprise application landscape

    Enterprise application landscape

    2.1.2 Inventory applications and interactions

    1-3 hours

    1. Individually list all electronic systems involved in the EAS function of the organization.
    2. Document data flows into and out of each system to the EAS. Refer to the example on the previous slides (ERP data flow) and sample Enterprise Application map.
    3. Review the processes in place (look at each functional area, including data moving into and out of systems.) Document manual processes. Identify integration points. If flow charts exist for these processes, it may be useful to provide these to the participants.
    4. If possible, diagram the system. Include information direction flow.
    Input Output
    • Business process inventory
    • List of applications (if available)
    • Current systems
    • Data flow map
    Materials Participants
    • Whiteboard, markers
    • Internal requirements documentation tools (if available)
    • Business analyst(s)
    • Subject matter experts
    • Core project team (optional)

    Understand how to navigate the complex web of stakeholders in ERP requirements gathering

    Identify which stakeholders to include and what their level of involvement should be during requirements elicitation based on relevant topic expertise.

    Sponsor End user IT Business
    Description An internal stakeholder who has final sign-off on the ERP project. Frontline users of the ERP technology. Back-end support staff who are tasked with project planning, execution, and eventual system maintenance. Additional stakeholders who will be impacted by any ERP technology changes.
    Examples
    • CEO
    • CIO/CTO
    • COO
    • CFO
    • Warehouse personnel
    • Sales teams
    • HR admins
    • Applications manager
    • Vendor relationship manager(s)
    • Director, Procurement
    • VP, Marketing
    • Manager, HR
    Value Executive buy-in and support is essential to the success of the project. Often, the sponsor controls funding and resource allocation. End users determine the success of the system through user adoption. If the end user does not adopt the system, the system is deemed useless and benefits realization is poor. IT is likely to be responsible for more in-depth requirements gathering. IT possesses critical knowledge concerning system compatibility, integration, and data. Involving business stakeholders in the requirements gathering will ensure alignment between HR and organizational objectives.

    Stakeholder influence vs. interest

    Large-scale EAS projects require the involvement of many stakeholders from all corners and levels of the organization, including project sponsors, IT, end users, and business stakeholders. Consider the influence and interest of stakeholders in contributing to the requirements elicitation process and involve them accordingly.

    Chart of Stakeholder Involvement during selection

    Extract functional and non-functional requirements from the customer interaction business process diagrams

    Once the most significant processes have been mapped, the business requirements must be extracted from the maps and transformed into functional and non-functional requirements. The example below illustrates how to extract requirements from an insurance claim process for the Record Claim step.

    Task Input Output Risks Opportunities Condition Sample requirements
    Record customer service claim Customer email Case record
    • Agent accidentally misses the email and case is not submitted
    • Reduce time to populate customer’s claim information into the case
    • Automation of data capture and routing
    • Pre-population of the case with the email contents
    • Suggested routing based on nature of case
    • Multi-language support

    Business:

    • System requires email-to-case functionality

    Non-functional:

    • The cases must be supported in multiple languages

    Functional:

    • The case must support the following information:
      • Title
      • Customer
      • Subject
      • Case origin
      • Case type

    Example claims process

    2.2.1 Capture your EAS requirements

    Time required varies

    1. Focus groups of 10-20 individuals may be the best way to ensure complete coverage of business requirements for EAS. This group should be cross-functional, with manager- or director-level representation from the departments that have a vested interest in the EAS project.
    2. Use your organization’s standard internal tools or download Info-Tech’s ERP Requirements Template, HRIS Requirements Template, or CRM Requirements Template.
    3. Document the requirements from the elicitation sessions.
    • The core team of business analysts should be present throughout, and the sessions should be led by an experienced facilitator (such as a senior business analyst).
    • Requirements for EAS should focus on achieving the future state rather than replicating the current state.
    • The facilitator should steer the team toward requirements that are solution-agnostic (i.e. not coached in terms of a particular vendor or product). Focus on customer and internal personas to help drive requirements.
    Input Output
    • Business unit functional requirements
    • Business process inventory
    • Data flow map
    • Inventory of business requirements
    Materials Participants
    • Whiteboard, markers
    • Internal requirements documentation tools (if available)
    • Info-Tech’s ERP Requirements Template, HRIS Requirements Template, or CRM Requirements Template (optional)
    • Business analyst(s)
    • Project manager
    • Subject matter experts
    • Core project team (optional)

    Prioritize your EAS requirements to assist with the selection

    Requirements prioritization ensures that the ERP selection project team focuses on the right requirements when putting together the RFP.

    Prioritization is the process of ranking each requirement based on its importance to project success. Hold a meeting for the domain SMEs, implementation SMEs, project managers, and project sponsors to prioritize the requirements list. At the conclusion of the meeting, each requirement should be assigned a priority level. The implementation SMEs will use these priority levels to ensure efforts are targeted toward the proper requirements and to plan features available on each release.

    Use the MoSCoW Model of Prioritization to effectively order requirements.

    The MoSCoW Model of Prioritization
    Must have Requirements must be implemented for the solution to be considered successful.
    Should have Requirements that are high priority should be included in the solution if possible.
    Could have Requirements are desirable but not necessary and could be included if resources are available.
    Won't have Requirements won’t be in the next release, but will be considered for the future releases.

    The MoSCoW model was introduced by Dai Clegg of Oracle UK in 1994. MindTools.

    Base your prioritization on the right set of criteria

    Effective prioritization criteria

    Criteria Description
    Regulatory and legal compliance These requirements will be considered mandatory.
    Policy compliance Unless an internal policy can be altered or an exception can be made, these requirements will be considered mandatory.
    Business value significance Give a higher priority to high-value requirements.
    Business risk Any requirement with the potential to jeopardize the entire project should be given a high priority and implemented early.
    Likelihood of success Especially in “proof of concept” projects, it is recommended that requirements have good odds.
    Implementation complexity Give a higher priority to low implementation difficulty requirements.
    Alignment with strategy Give a higher priority to requirements that enable the corporate strategy.
    Urgency Prioritize requirements based on time sensitivity.
    Dependencies A requirement on its own may be low priority, but if it supports a high-priority requirement, then its priority must match it.

    2.3.1 Prioritize your solution requirements

    Time required varies

    1. Consolidate all duplicate requirements to form a mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive list of functional and non-functional requirements.
    2. Identify the significance of each requirement for your solution evaluation according to the MoSCoW model. Control the number of mandatory requirements you document. Too many mandatory requirements could create an unrealistic framework for evaluating solutions.
    3. Categorize your requirements and delineate between functional (i.e. capabilities the system will be able to perform) and non-functional (i.e. environmental conditions of the system, such as technical and security requirements).
    InputOutput
    • Inventory of business requirements
    • Inventory of business requirements with priorities
    MaterialsParticipants
    • Whiteboard, markers
    • Internal requirements documentation tools (if available)
    • Info-Tech’s ERP Requirements Template, HRIS Requirements Template, or CRM Requirements Template (optional)
    • Business analyst(s)
    • Project manager
    • Subject matter experts
    • Core project team

    Identify which vendors’ product and capabilities meet your must-have requirements

    Highlight must-haves in the RFP

    • Once you have prioritized your business requirements for the EAS initiative, it is time to package them into an RFP.
    • It is critical to highlight must-have requirements in the RFP document. Doing so immediately eliminates vendors who do not feel that their products are suitable for your needs.

    WATCH OUT!

    Many vendors will try to stretch their capabilities to fit your must-have requirements. Leverage vendor demos in the next stage of selection to quickly rule out products that do not cover your critical requirements.

    Identify key process areas where you require vendor knowledge

    Example of Key process areas

    Completing a process inventory and a list of EAS requirements often shows process areas that need updates and improvement. Take this opportunity to highlight areas where you would benefit from knowing about most recent best practices and technologies.

    Inquire about these when engaging the vendor to know their level of knowledge and how their products work best in your industry.

    General product knowledge requests are not enough. Be specific.

    Determine the product knowledge areas that are specific to your implementation.

    Product Knowledge Proof of Concept Development Customer Service Warehousing Core HR Other Overall
    Data Security *
    Process Improvements * *
    Configuration
    Data Architecture *
    Integration
    On premise Infrastructure
    Cloud Infrastructure *
    Other

    Identify the product knowledge that is required in relation to your implementation. This can include core product knowledge and should be related to larger infrastructure and organizational requirements.

    More than just functional requirements

    What to include What to look at What is differentiating
    • Remember to include must-have conditions that do not directly relate to the behavior or functionality of the EAS product, but rather describe environmental conditions under which the solution must remain effective or qualities that the systems must have.
    • These can include requirements related to capacity, speed, security, availability, and the information architecture and presentation of the user interface.
    • Consider the vendor’s overall ability to execute.
      • Are they financially stable?
      • Do they have the resources to execute?
      • Do they have the skills to execute?
      • Are they able to provide post-implementation support?
    • Vendors understand that SaaS isn’t for everyone. Deployment models are one way they will continue to differentiate themselves.
    • Some vendors choose to compete on breadth and others on depth of expertise in public, private, and hosted cloud offerings.

    Info-Tech Insight
    Be wary of sunsetting products! Selecting the EAS based on a good knowledge of the vendor’s roadmap allows for business operations to continue without having to repeat a selection and implementation project in the near future.

    Dominant use-case scenarios for potential ERP solutions

    While an organization may be both product- and service-centric, most organizations fall into one of the two categories.

    Use case: Public sector

    The service-centric ERP use case is suitable for most organizations in the public sector. With that in mind, consider ERP solutions that offer grant disbursements, fleet management, and staffing/resourcing capabilities.

    Product-centric ERP Service-centric ERP
    What it is The product-centric ERP is suitable for organizations that manufacture, assemble, distribute, or manage material goods throughout a product lifecycle. ERP vendors and/or products that align to this use case usually cater to industries such as manufacturing, retail, aerospace and defense, distribution, and food and beverage. The service-centric ERP use case is suitable for organizations that provide and manage field services and/or professional services throughout a project lifecycle. ERP vendors and/or products that align to this use case usually cater to industries such as utilities, maintenance and repair, government, education, and professional services (i.e. consulting, legal).
    How it works Product-centric ERP has strong functionality in supply chain management, manufacturing, procurement management, and material job and project management. Service-centric ERP has strong functionality in resource job and project management, service management, and customer relationship management.

    EAS table stakes vs differentiating features

    Make sure features align with your objectives first.

    What are table stakes / standard features?

    • For every type of EAS, such as ERP, HRIS, and CRM, certain features are standard, but that doesn’t mean they are all equal.
    • The existence of features doesn’t guarantee quality or functionality to the standards you need. Never assume that yes in a features list means you don’t need to ask for a demo.

    What is differentiating/additional feature?

    • Differentiating features take two forms:
      • Some platforms offer differentiating features that are vertical specific.
      • Other platforms offer differentiating features that are considered cutting edge. These cutting-edge features may become table stakes over time.
    • These features may increase productivity but also require process changes.

    Info-Tech Insight
    If table stakes are all you need from your EAS solution, the only true differentiator for the organization is price. Otherwise, dig deeper to find the best price to value for your needs. Remove the product from your shortlist if table stakes are not met!

    Reign-In Ballooning Scope for EAS Selection Projects

    Stretching the EAS beyond its core capabilities is a short-term solution for a long-term problem. Educate stakeholders about the limits of EAS technology.

    Common pitfalls for EAS selection

    • Tangential capabilities may require separate solutions. It is common for stakeholders to list features such as content management as part of the new EAS platform. While content management goes hand in hand with the EAS’s ability to manage customer interactions, document management is best handled by a standalone platform.

    Keeping stakeholders engaged and in line

    • Ballooning scope leads to stakeholder dissatisfaction. Appeasing stakeholders by over customizing the platform will lead to integration and headaches down the road.
    • Make sure stakeholders feel heard. Do not turn down ideas in the midst of an elicitation session. Once the requirements gathering sessions are completed, the project team has the opportunity to mark requirements as “out of scope”, and communicate the reasoning behind the decision.
    • Educate stakeholders on the core functionality of EAS. Many stakeholders do not know the best-fit use cases for EAS platforms. Help end users understand what EAS is good at, and where additional technologies will be needed.

    Phase 3

    Engage, Evaluate, and Finalize Selection

    Phase 1
    1.1 Enterprise Application Landscape
    1.2 Validate Readiness
    1.3 Determine Resourcing

    Phase 2
    2.1 Capability Mapping
    2.2 Requirements Gathering Data Mapping
    2.3 Requirements Prioritizing

    Phase 3
    3.1 Understanding Product Offerings
    3.2 RFP & Demo Scripts
    3.3 Evaluation Select and Negotiate

    Phase 4
    4.1 Prepare for Implementation

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    In this phase of the project, you will review your RFx and build an initial list of vendors/implementors to reach out to. The final step is to build your evaluation checklist for rating the incoming responses.

    This phase involves the following participants:

    Key stakeholders from the various areas of the business that will support the project including:

    • Evaluation team
    • Vendor management team
    • Project management team
    • Core project team

    Select an Enterprise Application

    Products and vendors demystified

    Knowing who can provide the solution will shorten the selection process and provide the most suitable set of features.

    The Product The Vendor The VAR
    A product is the software, hardware, add-ins, and any value-added services or tools that are bundled together, e.g. SAP Rise (see What is RISE with SAP), SAP S4/HANA, etc. A vendor can carry and sell multiple products or lines of products (e.g. Oracle sells Oracle Fusion and NetSuite, etc.). The Value-added reseller (VAR) can sell a pre-packaged / pre-configured product. VARs are usually partners of the vendor and typically provide other packaged services including system hosting, customization, implementation, and integrations.

    Info-Tech Insight
    Selecting an Enterprise Application is much more than just selecting a software or product; it is selecting a long-term platform and partner to help achieve long-term strategic goals. Refer to our blueprint Select an ERP Implementation Partner.

    Consolidating the vendor shortlist up-front reduces downstream effort

    Put the “short” back in shortlist!

    • Radically reduce effort by narrowing the field of potential vendors earlier in the selection process. Too many organizations don’t funnel their vendor shortlist until near the end of the selection process. The result is wasted time and effort evaluating options that are patently not a good fit.
    • Leverage external data (such as SoftwareReviews) and expert opinion to consolidate your shortlist into a smaller number of viable vendors before the investigative interview stage, and eliminate time spent evaluating dozens of RFP responses.
    • Having fewer RFP responses to evaluate means you will have more time to do greater due diligence.

    Review your use cases to start your shortlist

    Your Info-Tech analysts can help you narrow down the list of vendors that will meet your requirements.

    Next steps will include:

    1. Reviewing your requirements.
    2. Checking out SoftwareReviews.
    3. Creating the RFP.
    4. Conducting demos and detailed proposal reviews.
    5. Selecting and contracting with a finalist!

    Evaluate software category leaders through vendor rankings and awards

    SoftwareReviews

    The Data Quadrant is a thorough evaluation and ranking of all software in an individual category to compare platforms across multiple dimensions.

    Vendors are ranked by their Composite Score, based on individual feature evaluations, user satisfaction rankings, vendor capability comparisons, and likeliness to recommend the platform.

    The Emotional Footprint is a powerful indicator of overall user sentiment toward the relationship with the vendor, capturing data across five dimensions.

    Vendors are ranked by their Customer Experience (CX) Score, which combines the overall Emotional Footprint rating with a measure of the value delivered by the solution.

    Speak with category experts to dive deeper into the vendor landscape

    Fact-based reviews of business software from IT professionals.

    Product and category reports with state-of-the-art data visualization.

    Top-tier data quality backed by a rigorous quality assurance process.

    User-experience insight that reveals the intangibles of working with a vendor.

    SoftwareReviews is powered by Info-Tech.

    Technology coverage is a priority for Info-Tech, and SoftwareReviews provides the most comprehensive unbiased data on today’s technology. The insights of our expert analysts provide unparalleled support to our members at every step of their buying journey.

    CLICK HERE to access SoftwareReviews

    Comprehensive software reviews to make better IT decisions.

    We collect and analyze the most detailed reviews on enterprise software from real users to give you an unprecedented view into the product and vendor before you buy.

    Case Study

    Manufacturer and retailer utilizes Info-Tech for goal of unifying four separate ERP systems

    INDUSTRY
    Manufacturing

    SOURCE
    Info-Tech Consulting

    Challenge Solution Results

    An amalgamation of eight different manufacturing, retail, and supply brands that operated four separate ERP systems and processes across the United States had poor visibility into operations.

    The organization had plans to unify the brands from a systems perspective and accommodate the company’s growth in a scalable and repeatable way.

    Info-Tech was previously engaged to perform an Establish a Concrete ERP Foundation workshop to set the groundwork for the eventual ERP selection.

    The organization engaged Info-Tech’s consulting group to assist in requirements gathering and RFP development.

    Info-Tech consultants traveled to five different states to gather ERP requirements from stakeholders and identify solution requirements.

    Info-Tech developed an ERP requirements matrix from the organization’s processes, including technical requirements and operations/support services.

    Info-Tech matched the organization with a use case and weighted requirements to assist in future scoring.

    An RFP was constructed using the organization’s requirements. and distributed to 10 qualified vendors for completion.

    Strengthen your RFP process with a thorough review

    Drive better sourcing outcomes.

    A quality SOW is the result of a quality RFI/RFP (RFx).

    Use Info-Tech’s RFP Review as a Service to review key items and ensure your RFP will generate quality responses and SOWs.

    • Is it well structured, with a consistent use of fonts and bullets?
    • Is it laid out in sections that are easily identifiable and that progress from high-level to more detailed information?
    • Can a vendor quickly identify the ten (or fewer) things that are most important to you?

    Contact Us

    3.2.1 Prepare the RFP

    1-2 hours

    1. Download Info-Tech’s ERP Request for Proposal Template or prepare internal best-practice RFP tools.
    2. Build your RFP.
      1. Complete the statement of work and general information sections to provide organizational context to your long-listed vendors.
      2. Outline the organization’s procurement instructions for vendors, including due diligence, assessment criteria, and dates.
      3. Input the business requirements document as created in Activity 1.3.1.
      4. Create a scenario overview to provide vendors with an opportunity to give an estimated price.
    3. Obtain approval for your RFP. Each organization has a unique procurement process; follow your own organization’s process as you submit your RFPs to vendors. Ensure compliance with your organization’s standard and gain approval for submitting your RFP.
    Input Output
    • Business requirements document
    • Procurement procedures
    • EAS RFP
    Materials Participants
    • Internal RFP tools/ templates (if available)
    • Info-Tech’s ERP RFP Template (optional)
    • Procurement SMEs
    • Project manager
    • Core project team (optional)

    Download the ERP Request for Proposal Template

    Streamline your evaluation of vendor responses

    Use Info-Tech’s ERP Vendor Response Template to standardize vendor responses.

    • Vendors tend to use their own standard templates when responding, which complicates evaluations.
    • Customize Info-Tech’s ERP Vendor Response Template to adjust for the scope and content of your project; input your organization’s procurement process and ERP requirements.
    • The template is meant to streamline the evaluation of vendor responses by ensuring you achieve comprehensiveness and consistency across all vendor responses. The template requires vendors to prove their organizational viability, understanding of the problem, and tested technology and implementation methodologies.

    Sections of the tool:

    1 Executive Summary

    2 About the Vendor

    3 Understanding of the Challenge

    4 Methodology

    5 Proposed Solution

    6 Project Plan and Timeline

    7 Vendor Qualifications

    8 References

    9 Additional Value-Added Services

    10 Additional Value-Added Goods

    For an explanation of how advanced features are determined, see Information Presentation – Feature Ranks (Stoplights) in the Appendix.

    What to look in vendor responses

    Vendor responses to an RFP can be very revealing about whether their product offering aligns with your EAS roadmap.

    Validate the vendor responses so that there are no misunderstandings with their offer. Here are key items to validate.

    Key items Why is this important?
    About the Vendor This is where the vendor will describe itself and prove its organizational viability.
    Understanding of the Challenge Demonstrating understanding of the problem is the first step in being able to provide a solution.
    Methodology Shows the vendor has a proven methodology to approach and solve the challenge.
    Proposed Solution Describes how the vendor will address the challenge. This is a very important section as it will articulate what you will receive from the vendor as a solution.
    Project Plan and Timeline Provides an overview of the project management methodology, phases of the project, and what will be delivered and when.
    Vendor Qualifications Provides evidence of prior experience with delivering similar projects for similar clients.
    References Provides contact information for individuals or organizations for which the vendor has worked and who can vouch for the experience and success of working with this vendor.
    Value-Added Services and Goods Allows vendors an opportunity to set themselves apart from the competition with additional services and/or goods applicable to your project but not covered elsewhere in the template.

    3.2.2 Build a vendor response template

    1-2 hours

    1. Download Info-Tech’s ERP Vendor Response Template.
    2. Validate that the provided template is comprehensive and will collect the information necessary for your organization to effectively evaluate the product and vendor and will inform a decision to invite the vendor in for a demonstration.
    3. Make the small customizations necessary to tailor the template to your organization (i.e. swap out “[Company X]” for your organization’s name).

    Download the ERP Vendor Response Template

    InputOutput
    • EAS RFP
    • ERP Vendor Response Template
    MaterialsParticipants
    • Info-Tech’s ERP Vendor Response Template
    • Procurement SMEs
    • Project manager
    • Core project team

    3.2.3 Evaluate RFP responses

    Varies

    1. Customize Info-Tech’s EAS RFP and Demonstration Scoring Tool to build a vendor and product evaluation framework for your EAS selection team.
    2. Review all RFP responses together with the core project team and stakeholders from procurement (if necessary).
    3. Input vendor solution information into the EAS RFP and Demonstration Scoring Tool.
    4. Analyze the vendors against your evaluation framework by paying specific attention to costing, overall score, and evaluation notes and comments.
    5. Identify vendors with whom you wish to arrange vendor demonstration.
    6. Contact vendors and arrange briefings.
    InputOutput
    • EAS RFP
    • ERP Vendor Response Template
    MaterialsParticipants
    • Info-Tech’s ERP Vendor Response Template
    • Procurement SMEs
    • Project manager
    • Core project team

    Download the EAS RFP and Demonstration Scoring Tool

    Identify specific use cases and develop demonstration scenarios

    These techniques can be used to gather requirements now and for vendor demos during the evaluation stage.

    Describe use cases to indicate how the various processes will operate. This technique can help end-users describe what the solution must do without needing to know how to describe requirements. Outline scenarios based on these use cases for vendors to demonstrate how their solution can fulfill business requirements.

    Define
    Define objectives for each specific use case.

    Explore
    Explore the various process paths and alternate outcomes for each use case.

    Build
    Build the details of the scenarios to describe the roles of the people involved and the detailed process steps to be accomplished.

    Use
    For each scenario, outline the expected outputs and variations.

    Info-Tech Insight
    Do not exceed three vendors when selecting participants for a product demonstration. Each vendor demonstration should last between one day and one week, depending on the scope of the project. Exceeding the threshold of three vendors can be massively time consuming and yield diminishing returns.

    Conduct vendor demos that extend beyond baseline requirements

    • Demo scripts should focus on differentiating vendor processes and capabilities that contribute to achieving your business’ strategic objectives.
    • You want vendors to show you what differentiates them and what can they do that is specific to your industry.
    • Avoid focusing on baseline EAS capabilities. While this may drive consistency across demonstrations, you will not get a clear picture of how one vendor may align with your unique business needs.
    • Ask the vendor questions pertaining to the differentiating factors listed below. Consider if the differentiating factors are worthwhile over the baseline capabilities shown.
    Adhere to this framework when crafting your scenarios:
    Simple and straightforward Series of steps
    • A straightforward narrative of what you need the product to do.
    • Once written, scenarios should be circulated to key stakeholders in the organization for validation.
    • Demonstrate how a user would interact with the system.
    • Should not be an explanation of specific features/functions.
    Specific Suitable for your business
    • Demonstrate exactly what you need the system to do, but don’t get into implementation details – don’t go too far into the how.
    • Select only critical functions that must be demonstrated.
    • Scenarios should reflect current realities within the organization, while still allowing processes to be improved.

    Add your scenarios to Info-Tech’s sample EAS demo script

    Take a holistic approach to vendor and product evaluation

    Almost – or equally – as important as evaluating vendor feature capabilities is the need to evaluate vendor viability and non-functional aspects of the EAS solution. Include an evaluation of the following criteria in your vendor scoring methodology.

    Vendor capability Description
    Usability and Intuitiveness The degree to which the system interface is easy to use and intuitive to end users.
    Ease of IT Administration The degree to which the IT administrative interface is easy to use and intuitive to IT administrators.
    Ease of Data Integration The relative ease with which the system can be integrated with an organization’s existing application environment including legacy systems, point solutions, and other large enterprise applications.
    Ease of Customization The relative ease with which a system can be customized to accommodate niche or industry-specific business or functional needs.
    Vendor Support Options The availability of vendor support options including selection consulting, application development resources, implementation assistance, and ongoing support resources.
    Availability and Quality of Training The availability of quality training services and materials that will enable users to get the most out of the product selected.
    Product Strategy, Direction, and Rate of Improvement The vendor’s proven ability for constant product improvement, deliberate strategic direction, and overall commitment to research and development efforts in responding to emerging trends.

    Info-Tech Insight
    Evaluating the vendor capabilities, not just product capabilities, is particularly important with EAS solutions. EAS solutions are typically long-term commitments; ensure that your organization is teaming up with a vendor or provider that you feel you can work well with and depend on.

    Case Study

    Structured RFP and demo processes ease the pain of vendor evaluations during the selection phase.

    INDUSTRY
    Automotive

    SOURCE
    Research Interview

    Challenge Solution Results

    This company is one of the largest automotive manufacturers worldwide and has various manufacturing facilities and distribution centers across Canada.

    With over 8,000 employees, the company has a multifaceted health and safety program. While head office enabled and used the health and safety module within the existing HRIS, some divisions within the company found the system complex and were still relying heavily on manual entry spreadsheets for incident investigations. As a result, the company decided to explore other options.

    A project team was created, led by a project manager from head office’s IT department. The team also included health and safety specialists from across the organization, who served as subject matter experts.

    The team put together a project outline, a roadmap for required functionality, and a business case to present to senior leadership, highlighting benefits and potential payback.

    After acquiring executive sponsorship, the team developed a Request for Proposal that was sent to 11 vendors.

    Among the evaluation criteria set in the RFP, injury cost analysis and analytics on safety were identified as the most critical requirements. Based on this criteria, the team narrowed down the options to four RFP responses, which were opened to 16 different sites to ensure consensus across the company.

    The team developed demo scripts to guide the product demonstrations. They also built evaluation scorecards that were used to narrow down the selection to two vendors. Ultimately, the final selection decision came down to how well the vendors’ teams knew the business, and the vendor that demonstrated greater industry expertise was selected.

    3.2.4 Build a demo script for product demonstration evaluation

    1-2 hours

    1. With the EAS selection team, use Info-Tech’s ERP Vendor Demonstration Script, HRIS Vendor Demonstration Script, or CRM Vendor Demonstration Script to write a demo script that reflects your organization’s EAS needs.
    2. Outline the logistics of the demonstration in the Introduction section of the template. Be sure to outline the total length of the demo and the amount of time that should be dedicated to the following:
      1. Product demonstration in response to the demo script.
      2. Showcase of unique product elements, not reflective of the demo script.
      3. Question and answer session.
      4. Breaks and other potential interruptions.
    3. Provide prompts for the vendor to display the capabilities by listing and describing usage scenarios by functional area. For example, when asking a vendor to demonstrate financial and accounting management capabilities, you may break scenarios out by task (e.g. general ledger, accounts payable) or user role (e.g. finance manager, administrator).

    Info-Tech Insight
    Challenge vendor project teams during product demonstrations. Asking the vendor to make adjustments or customizations on the fly will allow you to get an authentic feel for product capability and flexibility and for the degree of adaptability of the vendor project team. Ask the vendor to demonstrate how to do things not listed in your user scenarios, such as change system visualizations or design, change underlying data, add additional data sets, demonstrate collaboration capabilities, or trace an audit trail.

    3.2.4 Build a demo script for product demonstration evaluation

    Before the actual demonstrations, remember to communicate to the team the scenarios to be covered. Distribute the scripts ahead of the demonstrations so that the evaluation team know what is expected from the vendors.

    Input Output
    • Business requirements document
    • Logistical considerations
    • Usage scenarios by functional area
    • EAS demo script
    Materials Participants
    • Info-Tech’s ERP Vendor Demonstration Script, HRIS Vendor Demonstration Script, or CRM Vendor Demonstration Script
    • Business analyst(s)
    • Core project team

    A vendor scoring model provides a clear anchor point for your evaluation of EAS vendors based on a variety of inputs

    A vendor scoring model is a systematic method for effectively assessing competing vendors. A weighted-average scoring model is an approach that strikes a strong balance between rigor and evaluation speed.

    How do I build a scoring model? What are some of the best practices?
    • Start by shortlisting the key criteria you will use to evaluate your vendors. Functional capabilities should always be a critical category, but you’ll also want to look at criteria such as affordability, architectural fit, and vendor viability.
    • Depending on the complexity of the project, you may break down some criteria into sub-categories to assist with evaluation (for example, breaking down functional capabilities into constituent use cases so you can score each one).
    • One you’ve developed the key criteria for your project, the next step is weighting each criteria. Your weightings should reflect the priorities for the project at hand. For example, some projects may put more emphasis on affordability, others on vendor partnership.
    • Using the information collected in the subsequent phases of this blueprint, score each criteria from 1-100, then multiply by the weighting factor. Add up the weighted scores to arrive at the aggregate evaluation score for each vendor on your shortlist.
    • While the criteria for each project may vary, it’s helpful to have an inventory of repeatable criteria that can be used across application selection projects. The next slide contains an example that you can add or subtract from.
    • Don’t go overboard on the number of criteria: five to ten weighted criteria should be the norm for most projects. The more criteria (and sub-criteria) you must score against, the longer it will take to conduct your evaluation. Always remember – link the level of rigor to the size and complexity of your project! It’s possible to create a convoluted scoring model that takes significant time to fill out but yields little additional value.
    • Creation of the scoring model should be a consensus-driven activity between IT, procurement, and the key business stakeholders – it should not be built in isolation. Everyone should agree on the fundamental criteria and weights that are employed.
    • Consider using not just the outputs of investigative interviews and RFP responses to score vendors, but also third-party review services like SoftwareReviews.

    Info-Tech Insight
    Even the best scoring model will still involve some “art” rather than science – scoring categories such as vendor viability always entail a degree of subjective interpretation.

    Establish vendor evaluation criteria

    Vendor demonstrations are an integral part of the selection process. Having clearly defined selection criteria will help with setting up relevant demos and informing the vendor scorecards.

    Vendor evaluation criteria (weight)

    Functionality (30%) Ease of Use (25%)
    • Breadth of capability
    • Tactical capability
    • Operational capability
    • End-user usability
    • Administrative usability
    • UI attractiveness
    • Self-service options
    Cost (15%) Vendor (15%)
    • Maintenance
    • Support
    • Licensing
    • Implementation (internal and external costs)
    • Support model
    • Customer base
    • Sustainability
    • Product roadmap
    • Proof of concept
    • Implementation model
    Technology (15%)
    • Configurability options
    • Customization requirements
    • Deployment options
    • Security and authentication
    • Integration environment
    • Ubiquity of access (mobile)

    Info-Tech Insight
    Do not buy something that does not fit your functional needs just because it is the cheapest. ERP is a massive, long-term investment. If you purchase a system that does not contain the functionality that meets the organization’s business needs, not only will you face issues with user adoption, but you may also face having to revisit your ERP project down the road. In the end, this will cost you more than it will save you.

    Conduct client reference interviews to identify how other organizations have successfully used the vendor’s solution

    Request references from the vendors. Make sure the vendors deliver what they promise.

    Vendors are inevitably going to provide references that will give positive feedback, but don’t be afraid to dig into the interviews to understand some of the limitations related to the solution.

    • Even if a vendor is great for one client doesn’t necessarily mean it will fit for you. Ask the vendor to provide references from organizations in your own or a similar industry or from someone who has automated similar business processes or outlined similar expectations.
    • Use these reference calls as an opportunity to gain a more accurate understanding of the quality of the vendor’s service support and professional services.
    • If you are looking to include a high level of customization in your EAS solution, pay particular attention to this step and the client responses, as these will help you understand how easy a vendor is to work with.
    • Make the most of your client reference interviews by preparing your questions in advance and following a specific script.

    Sample Reference Check Questions

    Use Info-Tech’s Sample Reference Check Questions to provide a framework and starting point for your interviews with a vendor’s previous clients. Review the questions and customize to fit your needs.

    Determine costs of the solution

    Ensure the business case includes both internal and external costs related to the new EAS platform, allocating costs of project managers to improve accuracy of overall costs and level of success.

    EAS solutions include application costs and costs to design processes, install, and configure. These start-up costs can be a significant factor in whether the initial purchase is feasible.

    EAS vendor costs Internal costs
    • Application licensing
    • Implementation and configuration
    • Professional services
    • Maintenance and support
    • Training
    • Third-party add-ons
    • Data transformation
    • Integration
    • Project management
    • Business readiness
    • Change management
    • Resourcing (user groups, design/consulting, testing)
    • Training
    • Auditors (if regulatory requirements need vetting)
    When thinking about vendor costs, also consider the matching internal cost associated with the vendor activity (e.g. data cleansing, internal support). Project management is a top-five critical success factor at all stages of an enterprise application initiative from planning to post-implementation (Information Systems Frontiers). Ensuring that costs for such critical areas are accurately represented will contribute to success.

    Bring in the right resources to guarantee success. Work with the PMO or project manager to get creating the SOW.

    60% of IT projects are not finished “mostly or always” on time (Wellingtone, 2018).

    55% of IT personnel feel that the business objectives of their software projects are clear to them (Geneca, 2017).

    Download the blueprint Improve Your Statements of Work to Hold Your Vendors Accountable to define requirements for installation and configuration.

    3.3.1 Establish your evaluation criteria

    Time required varies

    Customize Info-Tech’s RFP and Demonstration Scoring Tool to build an evaluation framework for vendor responses based on set criteria rather than relative comparisons.

    This tool allows you to evaluate whether your organization’s requirements have been met by the vendor RFP response and provides a location for comprehensive documentation of the RFP response and demonstration details, including costing and availability/quality of product features, architecture, and vendor support.

    Finally, the tool gives you the ability to evaluate your shortlisted vendors’ demonstrations.

    InputOutput
    • Business requirements document
    • Logistical considerations
    • Usage scenarios by functional area
    • EAS evaluation criteria
    MaterialsParticipants
    • Info-Tech’s EAS RFP and Demonstration Scoring Tool
    • Procurement SMEs
    • Core project team

    3.3.1 Establish your evaluation criteria

    Time required varies

    1. With the EAS selection team, brainstorm a list of criteria against which you are going to evaluate each vendor and product.
    2. Categorize each criteria into four to eight groups.
    3. Assign ranked weightings to each category of evaluation criteria. The weightings should add up to 100%. Be sure to identify which criteria are most important to your team by assigning higher weightings to those criteria. If you are having trouble assigning ranked weightings to criteria, take your team through an exercise of ranking pairs. For example, if deciding on the ranked importance of cost, ease of use, and vendor support, break down the discussion by addressing just two criteria at a time: “Between cost and ease of use, which is more important?” If cost is selected… “Between cost and vendor support, which is more important?” If cost is selected again, decide on your second and third rankings by addressing the remaining two criteria… “Between vendor support and ease of use, which is more important?”
    4. Document the final output from this activity as an input to your EAS selection. Optionally, record it in Info-Tech’s EAS RFP and Demonstration Scoring Tool.

    Download the EAS RFP and Demonstration Scoring Tool

    Info-Tech Insight
    Do not reveal your evaluation criteria to vendors. Allowing vendors to see what matters most to your organization may sway their response and/or demo. Avoid this by keeping your decided evaluation criteria and weightings among your selection team only.

    3.3.2 Evaluate vendor product demonstrations

    Time required varies

    1. Using the demonstration script and vendor criteria previously established, customize Info-Tech’s EAS RFP and Demonstration Scoring Tool to build a scorecard that quickly evaluates vendor product demonstrations.
    2. Distribute the scorecard to every member of the team who is evaluating a particular demonstration.
    3. Evaluate each vendor product demonstration using the tool.
    4. Average all scores from each vendor demonstration to inform your selection decision. Note that the vendor with the highest overall score may not necessarily be the best fit for your organization.
    Input Output
    • Demonstration script
    • Evaluation criteria
    • ERP demonstration vendor scores
    Materials Participants
    • Info-Tech’s EAS RFP and Demonstration Scoring Tool
    • Core project team

    Download the EAS RFP and Demonstration Scoring Tool

    Decision Point: Select the Finalist

    After reviewing all vendor responses to your RFP, conducting vendor demos, and running a pilot project (if applicable) – the time has arrived to select your finalist.

    All core selection team members should hold a session to score each shortlisted vendor against the criteria enumerated on the previous slide, based on an in-depth review of proposals, the demo sessions, and any pilots or technical assessments.

    The vendor that scores the highest in aggregate is your finalist.

    Congratulations – you are now ready to proceed to final negotiation and inking a contract. This blueprint provides a detailed approach on the mechanics of a major vendor negotiation.

    Get the best value out from your EAS vendor. Negotiate on your own terms.

    Here are a few tips common to EAS vendors and its offerings.

    Vendors will give time-limited discounts to obtain your buy-in.

    • Depending on your procurement process, it is good practice to have at least two competing vendors in the running to obtain the best value.
    • Make sure that the package offered is coherent – that there are no gaps in the product offering.
    • Ask for access to a higher level of customer care or even developers to obtain quicker, specific support
    • Inquire about specific support and patching service, especially if you have customizations.
    • Ask for additional hours for training and support, pre- and post- implementation.
    • Think long-term – you want to have a good working relationship over the long haul, with a vendor that fits with your overall strategy, and not have to repeat and negotiate often.

    Use Info-Tech’s vendor services

    Info-Tech’s vendor management services has price benchmarks as well knowledgeable advisors who can help evaluate proposals to obtain the best value

    Speak to a vendor management services’ advisor today.

    Contact Us

    Communicate to the vendor whether they were accepted or rejected

    Communicate with each vendor following the demonstration and product evaluation. Ask follow-up questions, highlight areas of concern, and inform them of their status in the selection process.

    The RFP process is a standard business practice. As a customer, you are not under any obligation to educate the vendor as to the details of acceptance or rejection. However, consider every point of contact as an opportunity to build a strong network of potential vendors to help you acquire the best products for your organization.

    Use Info-Tech’s Vendor Communication Set template to communicate with the vendor following the demonstration and product evaluations. This set includes:

    Rejection Notice: Inform the vendor that they are no longer under consideration and highlight opportunities for future debrief.

    Approval Notice: Inform the vendor of its progress to the next stage of selection and identify next steps.

    Go to this link

    Phase 4

    Prepare for Implementation

    Phase 1
    1.1 Enterprise Application Landscape
    1.2 Validate Readiness
    1.3 Determine Resourcing

    Phase 2
    2.1 Capability Mapping
    2.2 Requirements Gathering Data Mapping
    2.3 Requirements Prioritizing

    Phase 3
    3.1 Understanding Product Offerings
    3.2 RFP & Demo Scripts
    3.3 Evaluation Select and Negotiate

    Phase 4
    4.1 Prepare for Implementation

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    Discussion on what it takes to transition to a proper implementation.

    Key stakeholders from the various areas of the business that will support the project including:

    • Project management team
    • Core project team

    Select an Enterprise Application

    Leverage Info-Tech’s research to plan and execute your EAS implementation

    Use Info-Tech Research Group’s three-phase implementation process to guide your own planning.

    Assess

    Prepare

    Govern and course correct

    Establish and execute an end-to-end, agile framework to succeed with the implementation of a major enterprise application.

    Visit this link

    External resources are available for implementations

    Organizations rarely have sufficient internal staffing to resource an EAS project on their own. Consider the options for closing the gap in internal resource availability.

    The most common project resourcing structures for enterprise projects are:

    Your own staff +

    1 Management Consultant

    2 Vendor Consultant

    3 System Integrator

    Consider the following:

    Internal vs. External Roles and Responsibilities

    Clearly delineate between internal and external team responsibilities and accountabilities, and communicate this to your technology partner upfront.

    Internal vs. External Accountabilities

    Accountability is different than responsibility. Your vendor or SI partner may be responsible for completing certain tasks, but be careful not to outsource accountability for the implementation – ultimately, the internal team will be accountable.

    Partner Implementation Methodologies

    Often vendors and/or SIs will have their own preferred implementation methodology. Consider the use of your partner's implementation methodology; however, you know what will work for your organization.

    Info-Tech Insight
    When contemplating a resourcing structure, consider:

    • Availability of in-house implementation competencies and resources.
    • Timeline and constraints.
    • Integration environment complexity.

    Review your options for external resources

    Narrow your search for a management consultant, vendor consultant, or system integrator partner by understanding under which circumstances each would be most appropriate.

    When to choose… Management consultant Vendor consultant System integrators
    • There is an existing and trusted relationship.
    • Scope of work includes consideration of internal IT operations, costing, etc.
    • Organization requires external industry expertise for strategy formulation.
    • They will have a role in overall change management within the enterprise.
    • There are no concerns with overall IT processes or capabilities.
    • The project scope is restricted to a single technology or application.
    • There is minimal integration with other systems.
    • The consultant has no role in business process change.
    • They will be a specialist reporting to other consultants.
    • Project includes products from different vendors or multiple add-ons.
    • Extensive integration is required with legacy or other applications.
    • They will be responsible for outsourced operational support or development following implementation.

    Info-Tech Insight
    Depending on your internal resourcing constraints and IT maturity, you may need to work with multiple partners. If this is the case, just be aware that working with multiple partners can complicate vendor relationship management and makes having a dedicated vendor or partner relationship manager even more important.

    4.1.1 Establish team composition

    1 – 2 hours

    Utilize Info-Tech’s Governance and Management of Enterprise Software Implementation to establish your team composition. Within that blueprint:

    1. Assess the skills necessary for an implementation. Inventory the competencies required for the implementation project team. Map your internal resources to each competency as applicable.
    2. Select your internal implementation team. Determine who needs to be involved closely with the implementation. Key stakeholders should also be considered as members of your implementation team.
    3. Identify the number of external consultants/support required for implementation. Consider your in-house skills, timeline considerations, integration environment complexity, and cost constraints as you make your team composition plan. Be sure to dedicate an internal resource to managing the vendor and partner relationships.
    4. Document the roles and responsibilities, accountabilities, and other expectations of your team as they relate to each step of the implementation.
    Input Output
    • Skills assessment
    • Stakeholder analysis
    • Vendor partner selection
    • Team composition
    Materials Participants
    • Sticky notes
    • Whiteboard
    • Markers
    • Project Team

    Governance and Management of Enterprise Software Implementation

    Follow our iterative methodology with a task list focused on the business must-have functionality to achieve rapid execution and to allow staff to return to their daily work sooner.

    Visit this link

    Ensure your implementation team has a high degree of trust and communication

    If external partners are needed, dedicate an internal resource to managing the vendor and partner relationships.

    Communication Proximity Trust
    Teams must have some type of communication strategy. This can be broken into:
    • Regularity: Having a set time each day to communicate progress and a set day to conduct retrospectives.
    • Ceremonies: Injecting awards and continually emphasizing delivery of value can encourage relationship building and constructive motivation.
    • Escalation: Voicing any concerns and having someone responsible for addressing those concerns.
    Distributed teams create complexity as communication can break down. This can be mitigated by:
    • Location: Placing teams in proximity can close the barrier of geographical distance and time zone differences.
    • Inclusion: Making a deliberate attempt to pull remote team members into discussions and ceremonies.
    • Communication tools: Having the right technology (e.g. video conference) can help bring teams closer together virtually.
    Members should trust that other members are contributing to the project and completing their required tasks on time. Trust can be developed and maintained by:
    • Accountability: Having frequent quality reviews and feedback sessions. As work becomes more transparent, people become more accountable.
    • Role clarity: Having a clear definition of what everyone’s role is.

    Create a formal communication process throughout the EAS implementation

    Establish a comprehensive communication process around the EAS enterprise roll-out to ensure that end users stay informed.

    The EAS kick-off meeting(s) should encompass:

    • Target business-user requirements
    • Target quality of service (QoS) metrics
    • Other IT department needs
    • Special consideration needs
    • Tangible business benefits of application
    • The high-level application overview

    The overall objective for inter-departmental EAS kick-off meetings is to confirm that all parties agree on certain key points and understand platform rationale and functionality.

    The kick-off process will significantly improve internal communications by inviting all affected internal IT groups, including business units, to work together to address significant issues before the application process is formally activated.

    Department groups or designated trainers should take the lead and implement a process for:

    • Scheduling EAS platform roll-out/kick-off meetings.
    • Soliciting preliminary input from the attending groups to develop further training plans.
    • Establishing communication paths and the key communication agents from each department who are responsible for keeping lines open moving forward.

    Plan for your implementation of EAS based on deployment model

    Place your EAS solution into your IT landscape by configuring and adjusting the tool based on your specific deployment method.

    On-Premises SaaS-based
    1. Identify custom features and configuration items
    2. Train developers and IT staff on new software investment
    3. Install software
    4. Configure software
    5. Test installation and configuration
    6. Test functionality
    1. Train developers and IT staff on new software investment
    2. Set up connectivity
    3. Identify VPN or internal solution
    4. Check firewalls
    5. Validate bandwidth regulations

    Integration is a top IT challenge and critical to the success of the EAS solution

    EAS solutions are most effective when they are integrated with ERP, HRIS, and CRM solutions.

    Data interchange between the EAS solution and other data sources is necessary Formulate a comprehensive map of the systems, hardware, and software with which the EAS solution must be able to integrate. Master data needs to constantly be synchronized; without this, you lose out on one of the primary benefits of integration. These connections should be bidirectional for maximum value (i.e. marketing data to the CRM, customer data to MMS).
    Specialized projects that include an intricate prospect or customer list and complex rules may need to be built by IT The more custom fields you have in your EAS and point solutions, the more schema mapping you will have to do. Include this information in the RFP to receive guidance from vendors regarding the ease with which integration can be achieved.
    Pay attention to legacy apps and databases If you have a legacy EAS and databases, more custom code will be required. Many vendors claim that custom integrations can be performed for most systems, but custom comes at a cost. Don’t just ask if they can integrate; ask how long it will take and for references from organizations which have been successful in this.

    Scenario: Failure to address EAS data integration will cost you in the long run

    A company spent $15 million implementing a new CRM system in the cloud and decided NOT to spend an additional $1.5 million to do a proper cloud DI tool procurement. The mounting costs followed.

    Cost element – Custom Data Integration $
    2 FTEs for double entry of sales order data $ 100,000/year
    One-time migration of product data to CRM $ 240,000 otc
    Product data maintenance $ 60,000/year
    Customer data synchronization interface build $ 60,000 otc
    Customer data interface maintenance $ 10,000/year
    Data quality issues $ 100,000/year
    New SaaS integration built in year 3 $ 300,000 otc
    New SaaS integration maintenance $ 150,000/year
    Cost element – Data Integration Tool $
    DI strategy and platform implementation $1,500,000 otc
    DI tool maintenance $ 15,000/year
    New SaaS integration point in year 3 $ 300,000 otc

    Comparison of Solution TCOs Chart

    Custom integration is costing this organization $300,000/year for one SaaS solution.

    The proposed integration solution would have paid for itself in 3-4 years and saved exponential costs in the long run.

    Proactively address data quality in the EAS during implementation

    Data quality is a make-or-break issue in an EAS platform; garbage in is garbage out.

    • EAS solutions are one of the leading offenders for generating poor quality data. As such, it’s important to have a plan in place for structuring your data architecture in such a way that poor data quality is minimized from the get-go.
    • Having a plan for data quality should precede data migration efforts; some types of poor data quality can be mitigated prior to migration.
    • There are five main types of poor-quality data found in EAS platforms.
      • Duplicate data: Duplicate records can be a major issue. Leverage dedicated de-dupe tools to eliminate them.
      • Stale data: Out-of-date customer information can reduce the usefulness of the platform. Use automated social listening tools to help keep data fresh.
      • Incomplete data: Records with missing info limit platform value. Specify data validation parameters to mandate that all fields are filled in.
      • Invalid and conflicting data: Can create cascading errors. Establishing conflict resolution rules in ETL tools for data integration can reduce issues.

    Info-Tech Insight
    If you have a complex EAS environment, appoint data stewards for each major domain and procure a de-dupe tool. As the complexity of EAS system-to-system integrations increase, so will the chance that data quality errors will crop up – for example, bi-directional POI with other sources of customer information dramatically increase the chances of conflicting/duplicate data.

    Profile data, eliminate dead weight, and enforce standards to protect data

    Identify and eliminate dead weight Poor data can originate in the firm’s EAS system. Custom queries, stored procedures, or profiling tools can be used to assess the key problem areas.
    Loose rules in the EAS system lead to records of no significant value in the database. Those rules need to be fixed, but if changes are made before the data is fixed, users could encounter database or application errors, which will reduce user confidence in the system.
    • Conduct a data flow analysis: map the path that data takes through the organization.
    • Use a mass cleanup to identify and destroy dead weight data. Merge duplicates either manually or with the aid of software tools. Delete incomplete data, taking care to reassign related data.
    • COTS packages typically allow power users to merge records without creating orphaned records in related tables, but custom-built applications typically require IT expertise.
    Create and enforce standards and policies Now that the data has been cleaned, it’s important to protect the system from relapsing.
    Work with business users to find out what types of data require validation and which fields should have changes audited. Whenever possible, implement drop-down lists to standardize values and make programming changes to ensure that truncation ceases.
    • Truncated data is usually caused by mismatches in data structures during either one-time data loads or ongoing data integrations.
    • Don’t go overboard on assigning required fields; users will just put key data in note fields.
    • Discourage the use of unstructured note fields: the data is effectively lost except if it gets subpoenaed.

    Info-Tech Insight
    Data quality concerns proliferate with the customization level of your platform. The more extensive the custom integration points and module/database extensions that you have made, the more you will need to have a plan in place for managing data quality from a reactive and proactive standpoint.

    Ensure requirements are met with robust user acceptance testing

    User acceptance testing (UAT) is a test procedure that helps to ensure end-user requirements are met. Test cases can reveal bugs before the suite is implemented.

    Five secrets of UAT success

    1 Create the plan With the information collected from requirements gathering, create the plan. Make sure this information is added to the main project plan documentation.
    2 Set the agenda The time allotted will vary depending on the functionality being tested. Ensure that the test schedule allows for the resolution of issues and discussion.
    3 Determine who will participate Work with relevant stakeholders to identify the people who can best contribute to system testing. Look for experienced power users who have been involved in earlier decision making about the system.
    4 Highlight acceptance criteria With the UAT group, pinpoint the criteria to determine system acceptability. Refer to requirements specified in use cases in the initial requirements-gathering stages of the project.
    5 Collect end user feedback Weaknesses in resolution workflow design, technical architecture, and existing customer service processes can be highlighted and improved with ongoing surveys and targeted interviews.

    Calculate post-deployment metrics to assess measurable value of the project

    Track the post-deployment results from the project and compare the metrics to the current state and target state.

    EAS selection and implementation metrics
    Description Formula Current or estimated Target Post-deployment
    End-user satisfaction # of satisfied users
    # of end users
    70% 90% 85%
    Percentage over/under estimated budget Amount spent – 100%
    Budget
    5% 0% 2%
    Percentage over/under estimated timeline Project length – 100%
    Estimated timeline
    10% -5% -10%
    EAS strategy metrics
    Description Formula Current or estimated Target Post-deployment
    Number of leads generated (per month) # of leads generated 150 200 250
    Average time to resolution (in minutes) Time spent on resolution
    # of resolutions
    30 minutes 10 minutes 15 minutes
    Cost per interaction by campaign Total campaign spending
    # of customer interactions
    $17.00 $12.00 $12.00

    Continue to adapt your governance model

    Your EAS and applications environment will continue to evolve. Make sure your governance model is always ready to capture the everchanging needs.

    Business needs will not stop changing whether you have an ongoing EAS or other application project. It is thus important to keep your governance efficient and streamlined to capture these needs to then make the EAS continue deliver value and remain aligned to long-term corporate objectives.

    Visit this link

    Summary of Accomplishment

    Select an Enterprise Application

    EAS technology is critical to facilitating an organization’s flow of information across business units. It allows for seamless integration of systems and creates a holistic view of the enterprise to support decision making. Having a structured approach to gathering the necessary resources, defining key requirements, and engaging with the right shortlist of vendors to pick the best finalist is crucial.

    This selection guide allows organizations to execute a structured methodology for picking an EAS that aligns with their needs. This includes:

    • Alignment and prioritization of key business and technology drivers for an EAS selection.
    • Identification and prioritization of the EAS requirements.
    • Construction of a robust EAS RFP.
    • A strong market scan of key players.
    • A survey of crucial implementation considerations.

    This formal EAS selection initiative will drive business-IT alignment, identify data and integration priorities, and allow for the rollout of a platform that’s highly likely to satisfy all stakeholder needs.

    If you would like additional support, have our analysts guide you through other phases as part of an Info-Tech workshop.

    Contact your account representative for more information.
    workshops@infotech.com
    1-888-670-8889

    Research Contributors

    Name Title Organization
    Anonymous Anonymous Telecommunications industry
    Anonymous Anonymous Construction material industry
    Anonymous Anonymous Automotive industry
    Corey Tenenbaum Head of IT Taiga Motors
    Mark Earley Director, Consulting Info-Tech Research Group
    Ricardo di Olivera Research Director, Enterprise Applications Info-Tech Research Group

    Bibliography

    “2016 Report on ERP Systems and Enterprise Software.” Panorama Consulting Solutions, 2016. Web.

    “2018 Report on ERP Systems and Enterprise Software.” Panorama Consulting Solutions, 2018. Web.

    “2022 HRIS Software Report.” SoftwarePath, 2022 . Web

    Cross-Industry Process Classification Framework (PCF) Version 7.2.1. APQC, 26 Sept. 2019. Web.

    “Doomed From the Start? Why a Majority of Business and IT Teams Anticipate Their Software Development Projects Will Fail.” Geneca, 25 Jan. 2017. Web.

    Farhan, Marwa Salah, et al. “A Systematic Review for the Determination and Classification of the CRM Critical Success Factors Supporting with Their Metrics.” Future Computing and Informatics Journal, vol. 3, no. 2, Dec. 2018, pp. 398–416.

    Gheorghiu, Gabriel. “ERP Buyer’s Profile for Growing Companies.” SelectHub, 23 Sept. 2022. Web

    “Process Frameworks.” APQC, 4 Nov. 2020. Web.

    “Process vs. Capability: Understanding the Difference.” APCQ, 2017. Web.

    Savolainen, Juha, et al. “Transitioning from Product Line Requirements to Product Line Architecture.” 29th Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC'05), IEEE, vol. 1, 2005, pp. 186-195, doi: 10.1109/COMPSAC.2005.160

    Saxena, Deepak, and Joe McDonagh. "Evaluating ERP Implementations: The Case for a Lifecycle based Interpretive Approach." Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation 22.1 (2019): pp29-37.

    “SOA Reference Architecture – Capabilities and the SOA RA.” The Open Group, TOGAF, n.d. Web.

    Smith, Anthony. “How To Create A Customer-Obsessed Company Like Netflix.” Forbes, 12 Dec. 2017. Web.

    "The Moscow Method", MindTools. Web.

    “The State of CRM Data Management 2020.” Validity, 2020. Web.

    “The State of Project Management Annual Survey 2018.” Wellingtone, 2018. Web.

    “Why HR Projects Fail.” Unleash, 2021. Web

    Implement Software Asset Management

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}313|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.3/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $107,154 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 39 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Asset Management
    • Parent Category Link: /asset-management
    • Organizations are aware of the savings that result from implementing software asset management (SAM), but are unsure of where to start the process.
    • Poor data capture procedures and lack of a centralized repository produce an incomplete picture of software assets and licenses, preventing accurate forecasting and license optimization.
    • Audit protocols are ad hoc, resulting in sloppy reporting and time-consuming work and lack of preparedness for external software audits.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • A strong SAM program will benefit all aspects of the business. Data and reports gained through SAM will enable data-driven decision making for all areas of the business.
    • Don’t just track licenses; manage them to create value from data. Gathering and monitoring license data is just the beginning. What you do with that data is the real test.
    • Win the audit battle without fighting. Conduct internal audits to minimize surprises when external audits are requested.

    Impact and Result

    • Conduct a current state assessment of existing SAM processes to form an appropriate plan for implementing or improving your SAM program.
    • Define standard policies, processes, and procedures for each stage of the software asset lifecycle, from procurement through to retirement.
    • Develop an internal audit policy to mitigate the risk of costly external audits.

    Implement Software Asset Management Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should implement software asset management, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Assess & plan

    Assess current state and plan the scope of the SAM program, team, and budget.

    • Implement Software Asset Management – Phase 1: Assess & Plan
    • SAM Maturity Assessment
    • SAM Standard Operating Procedures
    • SAM Budget Workbook

    2. Procure, receive & deploy

    Define processes for software requests, procurement, receiving, and deployment.

    • Implement Software Asset Management – Phase 2: Procure, Receive & Deploy
    • SAM Process Workflows (Visio)
    • SAM Process Workflows (PDF)

    3. Manage, redeploy & retire

    Define processes for software inventory, maintenance, harvest and redeployment, and retirement.

    • Implement Software Asset Management – Phase 3: Manage, Redeploy & Retire
    • Patch Management Policy

    4. Build supporting processes

    Build processes for audits and plan the implementation.

    • Implement Software Asset Management – Phase 4: Build Supporting Processes & Tools
    • Software Audit Scoping Email Template
    • Software Audit Launch Email Template
    • SAM Communication Plan
    • SAM FAQ Template
    • Software Asset Management Policy
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Implement Software Asset Management

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Assess & Plan

    The Purpose

    Assess current state and plan the scope of the SAM program, team, and budget.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Current state assessment

    Defined roles and responsibilities

    SAM budget plan

    Activities

    1.1 Outline SAM challenges and objectives.

    1.2 Assess current state.

    1.3 Identify roles and responsibilities for SAM team.

    1.4 Identify metrics and reports.

    1.5 Identify SAM functions to centralize vs. decentralize.

    1.6 Plan SAM budget process.

    Outputs

    Current State Assessment

    RACI Chart

    Defined metrics and reports

    SAM Budget Workbook

    2 Procure, Receive & Deploy

    The Purpose

    Define processes for software requests, procurement, receiving, and deployment.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Defined standards for software procurement

    Documented processes for software receiving and deployment

    Activities

    2.1 Determine software standards.

    2.2 Define procurement process for new contracts.

    2.3 Define process for contract renewals and additional procurement scenarios.

    2.4 Design process for receiving software.

    2.5 Design deployment workflow.

    2.6 Define process for non-standard software requests.

    Outputs

    Software standards

    Standard Operating Procedures

    SAM Process Workflows

    3 Manage, Redeploy & Retire

    The Purpose

    Define processes for software inventory, maintenance, harvest and redeployment, and retirement.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Defined process for conducting software inventory

    Maintenance and patch policy

    Documented workflows for software harvest and redeployment as well as retirement

    Activities

    3.1 Define process for conducting software inventory.

    3.2 Define policies for software maintenance and patches.

    3.3 Map software license harvest and reallocation process.

    3.4 Define policy for retiring software.

    Outputs

    Standard Operating Procedures

    Patch management policy

    SAM Process Workflows

    4 Build Supporting Processes & Tools

    The Purpose

    Build processes for audits, identify tool requirements, and plan the implementation.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Defined process for internal and external audits

    Tool requirements

    Communication and implementation plan

    Activities

    4.1 Define and document the internal audit process.

    4.2 Define and document the external audit process.

    4.3 Document tool requirements.

    4.4 Develop a communication plan.

    4.5 Prepare an FAQ list.

    4.6 Identify SAM policies.

    4.7 Develop a SAM roadmap to plan your implementation.

    Outputs

    Audit response templates

    Tool requirements

    Communication plan

    End-user FAQ list

    Software Asset Management Policy

    Implementation roadmap

    Further reading

    Implement Software Asset Management

    Go beyond tracking licenses to proactively managing software throughout its lifecycle.

    Table of contents

    1. Title
    2. Executive Brief
    3. Execute the Project/DIY Guide
    4. Next Steps
    5. Appendix

    Analyst Perspective

    “Organizations often conflate software asset management (SAM) with license tracking. SAM is not merely knowing how many licenses you require to be in compliance; it’s asking the deeper budgetary questions to right-size your software spend.

    Software audits are a growing concern for businesses, but proactive reporting and decision making supported by quality data will mitigate audit risks. Value is left on the table through underused or poor-quality data, so active data management must be in play. A dedicated ITAM tool can assist with extracting value from your license data.

    Achieving an optimized SAM program is a transformative effort, but the people, processes, and technology need to be in place before that can happen.” (Sandi Conrad, Senior Director, Infrastructure & Operations Practice, Info-Tech Research Group)

    Software license complexity and audit frequency are increasing: are you prepared to manage the risk?

    This Research Is Designed For:

    • CIOs that want to improve IT’s reputation with the business.
    • CIOs that want to eliminate the threat of a software audit.
    • Organizations that want proactive reporting that benefits the entire business.
    • IT managers who want visibility into their software usage.

    This Research Will Help You:

    • Establish a standardized software management process.
    • Track and manage software throughout its lifecycle, from procurement through to retirement or redeployment.
    • Rationalize your software license estate.
    • Improve your negotiations with software vendors.
    • Improve the quality of your SAM data gathering and reporting.

    Executive summary

    Situation

    • Organizations are aware of the savings that result from implementing software asset management (SAM), but are unsure of where to start the process. With no formal standards in place for managing licenses, organizations are constantly at risk for costly software audits and poorly executed software spends.

    Complication

    • Poor data-capture procedures produce an incomplete picture of software lifecycles.
    • No centralized repository exists, resulting in fragmented reporting.
    • Audit protocols are ad hoc, resulting in sloppy reporting and time-consuming work.

    Resolution

    • Conduct a current state assessment of existing SAM processes to form an appropriate plan for implementing or improving your SAM program.
    • Build and involve a SAM team in the process from the beginning to help embed the change.
    • Define standard policies, processes, and procedures for each stage of the software asset lifecycle, from procurement through to retirement. Pace yourself; a staged implementation will make your ITAM program a success.
    • Develop an internal audit program to mitigate the risk of costly audits.
    • Once a standardized SAM program and data are in place, you will be able to use the data to optimize and rationalize your software licenses.

    Info-Tech Insight

    A strong SAM program will benefit all aspects of the business.
    Data and reports gained through SAM will enable data-driven decision making for all areas of the business.

    Don’t just track licenses; manage them to create value from data.
    Gathering and monitoring license data is just the beginning. What you do with that data is the real test.

    Win the audit battle without fighting.
    Conduct internal audits to minimize surprises when external audits are requested.

    Build the business case for SAM on cost and risk avoidance

    You can estimate the return even without tools or data.

    Benefit Calculate the return
    Compliance

    How many audits did you have in the past three years?

    How much time did you spend in audit response?

    Suppose you had two audits each year for the last three years, each with an average $250,000 in settlements.

    A team of four with an average salary of $75,000 each took six months to respond each year, allocating 20% of their work time to the audit.

    You could argue annual audits cost on average $530,000. Increasing ITAM maturity stands to reduce that cost significantly.

    Efficiency

    How much do you spend on software and maintenance by supplier?

    Suppose you spent $1M on software last year. What if you could reduce the spend by just 10% through better practices?

    SAM can help reduce the annual spend by simplifying support, renegotiating contracts based on asset data, reducing redundancy, and reducing spend.

    The Business Benefits of SAM

    • Compliance: Managing audits and meeting legal, contractual, and regulatory obligations.
    • Efficiency: Reducing costs and making the best use of assets while maintaining service.
    • Agility: Anticipate requirements using asset data for business intelligence and analytics.

    Poor software asset management practices increase costs and risks

    Failure to implement SAM can lead to:

    High cost of undiscovered IT assets
    • Needless procurement of software for new hires can be costly.
    Licensing, liability, and legal violations
    • Legal actions and penalties that result from ineffective SAM processes and license incompliance can severely impact an organization’s financial performance and corporate brand image.
    Compromised security
    • Not knowing what assets you have, who is using them and how, can compromise the security of sensitive information.
    Increased management costs
    • Not having up-to-date software license information impacts decision making, with many management teams failing to respond quickly and efficiently to operational demands.
    Increased disruptions
    • Vendors seek out organizations who don’t manage their software assets effectively; it is likely that you could be subject to major operational disruptions as a result of an audit.
    Poor supplier/vendor relationship
    • Most organizations fear communicating with vendors and are anxious about negotiating new licenses.

    54% — A study by 1E found that only 54% of organizations believe they can identify all unused software in their organization.

    28% — On average, 28% of deployed software is unused, with a wasted cost of $224 per PC on unused software (1E, 2014).

    53% — Express Metrix found that 53% of organizations had been audited within the past two years. Of those, 72% had been audited within the last 12 months.

    SAM delivers cost savings beyond the procurement stage

    SAM delivers cost savings in several ways:

    • Improved negotiating position
      • Certainty around software needs and licensing terms can put the organization in a better negotiating position for new contracts or contract renewals.
    • Improved purchasing position
      • Centralized procurement can allow for improved purchasing agreements with better pricing.
    • More accurate forecasting and spend
      • With accurate data on what software is installed vs. used, more accurate decisions can be made around software purchasing needs and budgeting.
    • Prevention of over deployment
      • Deploy software only where it is needed based on what end users actively use.
    • Software rationalization
      • SAM data may reveal multiple applications performing similar functions that can be rationalized into a single standard software that is used across the enterprise.
    • License harvesting
      • Identify unused licenses that can be harvested and redeployed to other users rather than purchasing new licenses.

    SAM delivers many benefits beyond cost savings

    Manage risk. If licensing terms are not properly observed, the organization is at risk of legal and financial exposure, including illegal software installation, loss of proof of licenses purchased, or breached terms and conditions.

    Control and predict spend. Unexpected problems related to software assets and licenses can significantly impact cash flow.

    Less operational interruptions. Poor software asset management processes could lead to failed deployments, software update interruptions, viruses, or a shutdown of unlicensed applications.

    Avoid security breaches. If data is not secure through software patches and security, confidential information may be disclosed.

    More informed decisions. More accurate data on software assets improves transparency and informs decision making.

    Improved contract management. Automated tools can alert you to when contracts are up for renewal to allow time to plan and negotiate, then purchase the right amount of licenses.

    Avoid penalties. Conduct internal audits and track compliance to avoid fees or penalties if an external audit occurs.

    Reduced IT support. Employees should require less support from the service desk with proper, up to date, licensed software, freeing up time for IT Operations to focus on other work.

    Enhanced productivity. By rationalizing and standardizing software offerings, more staff should be using the same software with the same versioning, allowing for better communication and collaboration.

    Asset management is especially correlated with the following processes

    Being highly effective at asset management means that you are more likely to be highly effective at almost all IT processes, especially:

    Icon for process 'BAI10 Configuration Management'. Configuration Management
    76% more effective
    Icon for process 'ITRG03 Manage Service Catalogs'. Service Catalog
    74% more effective
    Icon for process 'APO11 Quality Management'. Quality Management
    63% more effective
    Icon for process 'ITRG08 Data Quality'. Data Quality
    62% more effective
    Icon for process 'MEA01 Performance Measurement'. Performance Measurement
    61% more effective
    Icon for process 'BAI05 Organizational Change Management'. Organizational Change Management
    60% more effective
    Icon for process 'APO05 Portfolio Management'. Portfolio Management
    59% more effective
    Icon for process 'APO03 Enterprise Architecture'. Enterprise Architecture
    58% more effective

    Why? Good SAM processes are integral to both service management and configuration management

    (Source: Info-Tech Research Group, IT Management and Governance Diagnostic; N=972 organizations) (High asset management effectiveness was defined as those organizations with an effectiveness score of 8 or above.)

    To accelerate progress, Info-Tech Research Group parses software asset management into its essential processes

    Focus on software asset management essentials

    Software Procurement:

    • Define procurement standards for software and related warranties and support options.
    • Develop processes and workflows for purchasing and work out financial implications to inform budgeting later.

    Software Deployment and Maintenance:

    • Define policies, processes, and workflows for software receiving, deployment, and maintenance practices.
    • Develop processes and workflows for managing imaging, harvests and redeployments, service requests, and large-scale rollouts.

    Software Harvest and Retirement:

    • Manage the employee termination and software harvest cycle.
    • Develop processes, policies, and workflows for software security and retirement.

    Software Contract and Audit Management:

    • Develop processes for data collection and validation to prepare for an audit.
    • Define metrics and reporting processes to keep asset management processes on track.
    A diagram that looks like a tier circle with 'Implement SAM' at the center. The second ring has 'Request & Procure', 'Receive & Deploy', 'Manage & Maintain', and 'Harvest & Retire'. The third ring seems to be a cycle beginning with 'Plan', 'Request', 'Procure', 'Deploy', 'Manage', 'Retire', and back to 'Plan'.

    Asset management is a key piece of Info-Tech’s COBIT-based IT Management and Governance Framework

    The Info-Tech / COBIT5 IT Management & Governance Framework, a number of IT process icons arranged like a periodic table. A magnifying glass highlights process 'BAI09 Asset Management' in the 'Infrastructure & Operations' category.

    Follow Info-Tech's methodology to build a plan to implement software asset management

    Phase 1
    Assess & Plan
    Phase 2
    Procure, Receive & Deploy
    Phase 3
    Manage, Redeploy & Retire
    Phase 4
    Build supporting processes

    1.1

    Assess current state

    2.1

    Request & procure

    3.1

    Manage & maintain contracts

    4.1

    Compliance & audits

    1.2

    Build team and define metrics

    2.2

    Receive & deploy

    3.2

    Harvest or retire

    4.2

    Communicate & build roadmap

    1.3

    Plan & budget
    Deliverables
    Standard Operating Procedures (SOP)
    SAM maturity assessment Process workflows Process workflows Audit response templates
    RACI chart Software standards Patch management policy Communication plan & FAQ template
    SAM metrics SAM policies
    SAM budget workbook

    Thanks to SAM, Visa saved $200 million in three years

    Logo for VISA.

    Case Study

    Industry: Financial Services
    Source: International Business Software Managers Association

    Visa, Inc.

    Visa, Inc. is the largest payment processing company in the world, with a network that can handle over 40,000 transactions every minute.

    Software Asset Management Program

    In 2006, Visa launched a formal IT asset management program, but it was not until 2011 that it initiated a focus on SAM. Joe Birdsong, the SAM director, first addressed four major enterprise license agreements (ELAs) and compliance issues. The SAM team implemented a few dedicated SAM tools in conjunction with an aggressive approach to training.

    Results

    The proactive approach taken by Visa used a three-pronged strategy: people, process, and tools. The process included ELA negotiations, audit responses, and software license rationalization exercises.

    According to Birdsong, “In the past three years, SAM has been credited with saving Visa over $200 million.”

    An timeline arrow with benchmarks, in order: 'Tool purchases', 'ELA negotiations', 'License rationalization', 'Audit responses', '$200 million in savings in just three years thanks to optimized SAM processes'.

    Info-Tech delivers: Use our tools and templates to accelerate your project to completion

    Thumbnail of Info-Tech's 'SAM Standard Operating Procedures (SOP)'.
    SAM Standard Operating Procedures (SOP)
    Thumbnail of Info-Tech's 'SAM Maturity Assessment'.
    SAM Maturity Assessment
    Thumbnail of Info-Tech's 'SAM Visio Process Workflows'.
    SAM Visio Process Workflows
    Thumbnail of Info-Tech's 'SAM Budget Workbook'.
    SAM Budget Workbook
    Thumbnail of Info-Tech's 'Additional SAM Policy Templates'.
    Additional SAM Policy Templates
    Thumbnail of Info-Tech's 'Software Asset Management Policy'.
    Software Asset Management Policy
    Thumbnail of Info-Tech's 'SAM Communication Plan'.
    SAM Communication Plan
    Thumbnail of Info-Tech's 'SAM FAQ Template'.
    SAM FAQ Template

    Use these insights to help guide your understanding of the project

    • SAM provides value to other processes in IT.
      Data, reports, and savings gained through SAM will enable data-driven decision making for all areas of the business.
    • Don’t just track licenses; manage them to create value from data.
      Gathering and monitoring license data is just the beginning. What you do with that data is the real test.
    • SAM isn’t about managing costs; it’s about understanding your environment to make better decisions.
      Capital tied up in software can impact the progress of other projects.
    • Managing licenses can impact the entire organization.
      Gain project buy-in from stakeholders by articulating the impact that managing licenses can have on other projects and the prevalence of shadow IT.

    Measure the value of a guided implementation (GI)

    Engaging in GIs doesn’t just offer valuable project advice, it also results in significant cost savings.

    GI Measured Value (Assuming 260 workdays in a year)
    Phase 1: Assess & Plan
    • Time, value, and resources saved by using Info-Tech’s methodology to assess current state and create a defined SAM team with actionable metrics
    • For example, 2 FTEs * 5 days * $80,000/year = $6,400
    Phase 2: Procure, Receive & Deploy
    • Time, value, and resources saved by using Info-Tech’s methodology to streamline request, procurement, receiving, and deployment processes for software assets.
    • For example, 2 FTEs * 5 days * $80,000/year = $6,400
    Phase 3: Manage, Redeploy & Retire
    • Time, value, and resources saved by using Info-Tech’s methodology to streamline the maintenance, inventory, license redeployment, and software retiring processes.
    • For example, 2 FTEs * 5 days * $80,000/year = $6,400
    Phase 4: Build Supporting Processes and Tools
    • Time, resources, and potential audit fines saved by using Info-Tech’s methodology to improve audit defense processes ($298,325 average audit penalty (Based on the results of Cherwell Software’s 2013 Software Audit Industry Report)) and design a communication and implementation plan.
    • For example, 2 FTEs * 5days * $80,000/year = $6,400 + $298,325 = $304,725
    Total savings $330,325

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    Guided Implementation

    Workshop

    Consulting

    "Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful." "Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track." "We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place." "Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project."

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

    Implement Software Asset Management – project overview

    Phase 1: Assess & plan Phase 2: Procure, receive & deploy Phase 3: Manage, redeploy & retire Phase 4: Build supporting processes
    Supporting Tool icon Best-Practice Toolkit

    Step 1.1: Assess current state

    Step 1.2: Build team and define metrics

    Step 1.3: Plan and budget

    Step 2.1: Request and procure

    Step 2.2: Receive and deploy

    Step 3.1: Manage and maintain contracts

    Step 3.2: Harvest, redeploy, or retire

    Step 4.1: Compliance and audits

    Step 4.2: Communicate and build roadmap

    Guided Implementations
    • Assess current state and challenges.
    • Define roles and responsibilities as well as metrics.
    • Discuss SAM budgeting.
    • Define software standards and procurement process.
    • Build processes for receiving software and deploying software.
    • Define process for conducting software inventory and maintenance and patches.
    • Build software harvest and redeployment processes and retirement.
    • Define process for internal and external audits.
    • Develop communication and implementation plan.
    Associated Activity icon Onsite Workshop Module 1:
    Assess & Plan
    Module 2:
    Map Core Processes: Procure, Receive & Deploy
    Module 3:
    Map Core Processes: Manage, Redeploy & Retire
    Module 4:
    Prepare for audit, build roadmap and communications

    Workshop Overview

    Contact your account representative or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Workshop Day 1 Workshop Day 2 Workshop Day 3 Workshop Day 4
    Activities
    Assess & Plan

    1.1 Outline SAM challenges and objectives

    1.2 Assess current state

    1.3 Identify roles and responsibilities for SAM team

    1.4 Identify metrics and reports

    1.5 Identify SAM functions to centralize vs. decentralize

    1.6 Plan SAM budget process

    Map Core Processes: Procure, Receive & Deploy

    2.1 Determine software standards

    2.2 Define procurement process for new contracts

    2.3 Define process for contract renewals and additional procurement scenarios

    2.4 Design process for receiving software

    2.5 Design deployment workflow

    2.6 Define process for non-standard software requests

    Map Core Processes: Manage, Redeploy & Retire

    3.1 Define process for conducting software inventory

    3.2 Define policies for software maintenance and patches

    3.3 Map software license harvest and reallocation process

    3.4 Define policy for retiring software

    Build Supporting Processes

    4.1 Define and document the internal audit process

    4.2 Define and document the external audit process

    4.3 Develop a communication plan

    4.4 Prepare an FAQ list

    4.5 Identify SAM policies

    4.6 Develop a SAM roadmap to plan your implementation

    Deliverables
    • SAM maturity assessment
    • RACI chart
    • Defined metrics and reports
    • Budget workbook
    • Process workflows
    • Software standards
    • Process workflows
    • Patch management policy
    • Standard operating procedures
    • Audit response templates
    • Communication plan
    • FAQ template
    • Additional policy templates
    • Roadmap of initiatives

    Use these icons to help direct you as you navigate this research

    Use these icons to help guide you through each step of the blueprint and direct you to content related to the recommended activities.

    A small monochrome icon of a wrench and screwdriver creating an X.

    This icon denotes a slide where a supporting Info-Tech tool or template will help you perform the activity or step associated with the slide. Refer to the supporting tool or template to get the best results and proceed to the next step of the project.

    A small monochrome icon depicting a person in front of a blank slide.

    This icon denotes a slide with an associated activity. The activity can be performed either as part of your project or with the support of Info-Tech team members, who will come onsite to facilitate a workshop for your organization.

    Phase 1: Assess Current State

    VISA fought fire with fire to combat costly software audits

    Logo for VISA.

    Case Study

    Industry: Financial Services
    Source: SAM Summit 2014

    Challenge

    Visa implemented an IT asset management program in 2006. After years of software audit teams from large firms visiting and leaving expensive software compliance bills, the world’s leading payment processing company decided it was time for a change.

    Upper management recognized that it needed to combat audits. It had the infrastructure in place and the budget to purchase SAM tools that could run discovery and tracking functions, but it was lacking the people and processes necessary for a mature SAM program.

    Solution

    Visa decided to fight fire with fire. It initially contracted the same third-party audit teams to help build out its SAM processes. Eventually, Visa formed a new SAM team that was led by a group of former auditors.

    The former auditors recognized that their role was not technology based, so a group of technical individuals were hired to help roll out various SAM tools.

    The team rolled out tools like BDNA Discover and Normalize, Flexera FlexNet Manager, and Microsoft SCCM.

    Results

    To establish an effective SAM team, diverse talent is key. Visa focused on employees that were consultative but also technical. Their team needed to build relationships with teams within the organization and externally with vendors.

    Most importantly, the leaders of the team needed to think like auditors to better prepare for audits. According to Joe Birdsong, SAM Director at Visa, “we want to be viewed as a team that can go in and help right-size their environment and better understand licensing to help teams make better decisions.”

    The SAM team was only the beginning.

    Step 1.1 Assess current state and plan scope

    Phase 1:
    Assess & Plan
    This step will walk you through the following activities:This step involves the following participants:

    1.1

    Assess current state
    • 1.1.1 Outline the organization’s SAM challenges
    • 1.1.2 Identify objectives of SAM program
    • 1.1.3 Determine the maturity of your SAM program
    • Project Sponsor
    • IT Director, CIO
    • IT Managers and SAM Manager

    1.2

    Build team and define metrics

    1.3

    Plan & budget

    Step Outcomes

    • An outline of the challenges related to SAM
    • A clear direction for the program based on drivers, anticipated benefits, and goals
    • A completed maturity assessment of current SAM processes

    Sketch out challenges related to software asset management to shape the direction of the project

    Common SAM challenges

    • Audits are disruptive, time-consuming, and costly
    • No audit strategy and response in place
    • Software non-compliance risk is too high
    • Lacking data to forecast software needs
    • No central repository of software licenses
    • Untracked or unused software licenses results in wasted spend
    • Software license and maintenance costs account for a large percentage of the budget
    • Lacking data to know what software is purchased and deployed across the organization
    • Lack of software standards make it difficult to collect consistent information about software products
    • New software licenses are purchased when existing licenses remain on the shelf or multiple similar software products are purchased
    • Employees or departments make ad hoc purchases, resulting in overspending and reduced purchasing power
    • License renewal dates come up unexpectedly without time for adequate decision making
    • No communication between departments to coordinate software purchasing
    • Difficult to stay up to date with software licensing rule changes to remain in compliance
    • Processes and policies are unstandardized and undocumented

    Outline the organization’s SAM challenges

    Associated Activity icon 1.1.1 Brainstorm SAM challenges

    Participants: CIO/CFO, IT Director, Asset Manager, Purchasing, Service Desk Manager, Security (optional), Operations (optional)

    1. Distribute sticky notes to participants. Have everyone start by identifying challenges they face as a result of poor software asset management.
    2. As group, discuss and outline the software asset management challenges facing the organization. These may be challenges caused by poor SAM processes or simply by a lack of process. Group the challenges into key pain points to inform the current state discussion and assessment to follow.

    To be effective with software asset management, understand the drivers and potential impact to the organization

    Drivers of effective SAM Results of effective SAM
    Contracts and vendor licensing programs are complex and challenging to administer without data related to assets and their environment. Improved access to accurate data on contracts, licensing, warranties, installed software for new contracts, renewals, and audit requests.
    Increased need to meet compliance requires a formal approach to tracking and managing assets. Encryption, software application controls, and change notifications all contribute to better asset controls and data security.
    Cost cutting is on the agenda, and management is looking to reduce overall IT spend in the organization in any possible way. Reduction of software spend through data for better forecasting, planning, and licensing rationalization and harvesting.
    Audits are time consuming, disruptive to project timelines and productivity, and costly. Respond to audits with a formalized process, accurate data, and minimal disruption using always-available reporting.

    Determine goals to focus the direction of your SAM program

    Associated Activity icon 1.1.2 Identify objectives of the SAM program

    Participants: CIO/CFO, IT Director, Asset Manager, Service Manager (optional)

    Document: Document in the Standard Operating Procedures.

    1. Identify the drivers behind the software asset management implementation or improvement project. List on a whiteboard or flip chart.
    2. Using the project drivers as input, brainstorm the goals of the SAM project. Discuss the goals as a group and finalize into a list of objectives for the SAM program.
    3. Record the objectives in the SOP and keep them in mind as you work through the rest of the project.

    Sample Objectives:

    1. A single data repository to efficiently manage assets for their entire lifecycle.
    2. Formalizing a methodology for documenting assets to make data retrieval easy and accurate.
    3. Defining and documenting processes to determine where improvements can be made.
    4. Improving customer experience in accessing, using, and maintaining assets.
    5. Centralizing contract information.
    6. Providing access to information for all technical teams as needed.

    Implementing SAM processes will support other IT functions

    By improving how you manage your licenses and audit requests, you will not only provide benefits through a mature SAM program, you will also improve your service desk and disaster recovery functions.

    Service Desk Disaster Recovery
    • Effective service desk tickets require a certain degree of technical detail for completion that a SAM program often provides.
    • Many tools are available that can handle both ITSM and ITAM functions. Your SAM data can be integrated into many of your service desk functions.
    • For example, if a particular application is causing a high number of tickets, SAM data could show the application’s license is almost expired and its usage has decreased due to end-user frustrations. The SAM team could review the application and decide to purchase software that better meets end-user needs.
    • If you don’t know what you have, you don’t know what needs to be back online first.
    • The ability to restore system functionality is heavily dependent on the ability to locate or reproduce master media documentation and system configuration information.
    • If systems/software are permanently lost, the ability to recover software licensing information is crucial to preserving compliance.
    • License agreement and software are needed to demonstrate software ownership. Unless the proof of ownership is present, there is no proof of compliance.
    Short description of Info-Tech blueprint 'Standardize the Service Desk'. Short description of Info-Tech blueprint 'Create a Right-Sized Disaster Recovery Plan'.

    Each level of SAM maturity comes with its own unique challenges

    Maturity People & Policies Processes Technology
    Chaos
    • No dedicated staff
    • No policies published
    • Procedures not documented or standardized
    • Licenses purchased randomly
    • Help desk images machines, but users can buy and install software
    • Minimal tracking tools in place
    Reactive
    • Semi-focused SAM manager
    • No policies published
    • Reliance on suppliers to provide reports for software purchases
    • Buy licenses as needed
    • Software installations limited to help desk
    • Discovery tools and spreadsheets used to manage software
    Controlled
    • Full-time SAM manager
    • End-user policies published and requiring sign-off
    • License reviews with maintenance and support renewals
    • SAM manager involved in budgeting and planning sessions
    • Discovery and inventory tools used to manage software
    • Compliance reports run as needed
    Proactive
    • Extended SAM team, including help desk and purchasing
    • Corporate anti-piracy statement in place and enforced
    • Quarterly license reviews
    • Centralized view into software licenses
    • Software requests through service catalog with defined standard and non-standard software
    • Product usage reports and alerts in place to harvest and reuse licenses
    • Compliance and usage reports used to negotiate software contracts
    Optimized
    • SAM manager trained and certified
    • Working with HR, Legal, Finance, and IT to enforce policies
    • Full support and maintenance analysis for all license reviews
    • Quarterly meetings with SAM team to review policies, procedures, upcoming contracts, and rollouts
    • Software deployed automatically through service catalog/apps store
    • Detailed savings reports provided to executive team annually
    • Automated policy enforcement and process workflows

    Determine the maturity of your SAM program

    Supporting Tool icon 1.1.3 Use the SAM Maturity Assessment Tool
    1. Download the SAM Maturity Assessment Tool and go to tab 2.
    2. Complete the self-assessment in all seven categories:
      1. Control Environment
      2. Roles & Responsibilities
      3. Policies & Procedures
      4. Competence
      5. Planning & Implementation Process
      6. Monitoring & Review
      7. Inventory Processes
    3. Go to tab 3 and examine the graphs produced. Identify the areas in your SAM program that require the most attention and which are already relatively mature.
    4. Use the results of this maturity assessment to focus the efforts of the project moving forward. Return to the assessment after a pre-determined time (e.g. one year later) to track improvement in maturity over time.
    Screenshot of the results page from the SAM Maturity Assessment Tool. Screenshot of the processes page from the SAM Maturity Assessment Tool.

    Step 1.2 Build team and define metrics

    Phase 1:
    Assess & Plan
    This step will walk you through the following activities:This step involves the following participants:

    1.1

    Assess current state
    • 1.2.1 Identify roles and responsibilities for SAM team
    • 1.2.2 Identify metrics and KPIs to track the success of your SAM program
    • 1.2.3 Define SAM reports to track metrics
    • CIO/CFO
    • IT Director
    • SAM Manager
    • SAM Team
    • Service Desk Manager

    1.2

    Build team and define metrics

    1.3

    Plan & budget

    Step Outcomes

    • A description of the roles and responsibilities of IT staff involved in SAM
    • A list of metrics and reports to track to measure the success of the software asset management program

    Define roles and responsibilities for the SAM program

    Roles and responsibilities should be adapted to fit specific organizational requirements based on its size, structure, and distribution and the scope of the program. Not all roles are necessary and in small organizations, one or two people may fulfill multiple roles.

    Senior Management Sponsor – Ensures visibility and support for the program.

    IT Asset Manager – Responsible for management of all assets and maintaining asset database.

    Software Asset Manager – Responsible for management of all software assets (a subset of the overall responsibility of the IT Asset Manager).

    SAM Process Owner – Responsible for overall effectiveness and efficiency of SAM processes.

    Asset Analyst – Maintains up-to-date records of all IT assets, including software version control.

    Additional roles that interact with SAM:

    • Security Manager
    • Auditors
    • Procurement Manager
    • Legal Council
    • Change Manager
    • Configuration Manager
    • Release and Deployment Manager
    • Service Desk Manager

    Form a software asset management team to drive project success

    Many organizations simply do not have a large enough staff to hire a full-time software asset manager. The role will need to be championed by an internal employee.

    Avoid filling this position with a temporary contract; one of the most difficult operational factors in SAM implementation and continuity is constant turnover and organizational shifts. Hiring a software asset manager on contract might get the project going faster, but without the knowledge gained by doing the processes, the program won’t have enough momentum to sustain itself.

    Software Asset Manager Duties

    • Gather proof of license.
    • Record and track all assets within the SAM repository.
    • Produce compliance reports.
    • Preparation of budget requests.
    • Administration of software renewal process.
    • Contract and support analysis.
    • Document procedures.
    • Ensure project is on track.

    SAM Team Member Duties

    • Record license and contract data in SAM tool.
    • Assist in production of SAM reports.
    • Data analysis.
    • Match tickets to SAM data.
    • Assist in documentation.
    • Assist in compliance reports.
    • Gather feedback from end users.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Make sure your SAM team is diverse. The SAM team will need to be skilled at achieving compliance, but there is also a need for technically skilled individuals to maximize the function of the SAM tool(s) at your organization.

    Identify roles and responsibilities for SAM

    Associated Activity icon 1.2.1 Complete a RACI chart for your organization

    Participants: CIO/CFO, IT Director, SAM Manager, SAM Team, Service Desk Manager

    Document: Document in the Standard Operating Procedures.

    Determine the roles and responsibilities for your SAM program. Record the results in a RACI (responsible, accountable, consulted, informed) chart such as the example below.

    SAM Processes and Tasks CIO CFO SAM Manager IT Director Service Management Team IT Ops Security Finance Legal Project Manager
    Policies/Governance A C R R I I C I R I
    Strategy A C R R I I I I C
    Risk Management/Asset Security A C R R C R C C C
    Data Entry/Quality I I A R R
    Compliance Auditing R C A R I I I I
    Education & Training R I A C I I
    Contract Lifecycle Management R R A R C C C C R C
    Workflows R C A R I I I R I C/I
    Budgeting R R R A C R
    Software Acquisition R I A R I C R C C
    Controls/Reporting R I A R I I C I
    Optimize License Harvesting I I A R I C C

    Identify metrics to form the framework of the project

    Trying to achieve goals without metrics is like trying to cook without measuring your ingredients. You might succeed, but you’ll have no idea how to replicate it.

    SAM metrics should measure one of five categories:

    • Quantity → How many do we have? How many do we want?
    • Compliance → What is the level of compliance in a specific area?
    • Duration → How long does it take to achieve the desired result?
    • Financial → What is the cost/value? What is our comparative spend?
    • Quality → How good was the end result? E.g. Completeness, accuracy, timeliness

    The metrics you track depend on your maturity level. As your organization shifts in maturity, the metrics you prioritize for tracking will shift to reflect that change. Example:

    Metric category Low maturity metric High maturity metric
    Compliance % of software installed that is unauthorized % of vendors in effective licensing position (ELP) report
    Quantity % of licenses documented in ITAM tool % of requests made through unauthorized channels

    Associate KPIs and metrics with SAM goals

    • Identify the critical success factors (CSFs) for your software asset management program based on strategic goals.
    • For each success factor, identify the key performance indicators (KPIs) to measure success, as well as specific metrics that will be tracked and reported on.
    • Sample metrics are below:

    CSF = Goal, or what success looks like

    KPI = How achievement of goal will be defined

    Metric = Numerical measure to determine if KPI has been achieved

    CSF/Goal KPI Metrics
    Improve accuracy of software budget and forecasting
    • Reduce software spend by 5%
    • Total software asset spending
    • Budgeted software spend vs. actual software spend
    Avoid over purchasing software licenses and optimize use of existing licenses
    • Reduce number of unused and underused licenses by 10%
    • Number of unused licenses
    • Money saved from harvesting licenses instead of purchasing new ones
    Improve accuracy of data
    • Data in SAM tool matches what is deployed with 95% accuracy
    • Percentage of entitlements recorded in SAM tool
    • Percentage of software titles recognized by SAM tool
    Improved service delivery
    • Reduce time to deploy new software by 10%
    • Mean time to purchase new software
    • Mean time to fulfill new software requests

    Identify metrics and KPIs to track the success of your SAM program

    Associated Activity icon 1.2.2 Brainstorm metrics and KPIs

    Participants: CIO, IT Director, SAM Manager, SAM Team

    Document: Document in the Standard Operating Procedures.

    1. Discuss the goals and objectives of implementing or improving software asset management, based on challenges identified earlier.
    2. From the goals, identify the critical success factors for the SAM program.
    3. For each CSF, identify one to three key performance indicators (KPIs) to evaluate achievement of the success factor.
    4. For each KPI, identify one to three metrics that can be tracked and reported on to measure success. Ensure that the metrics are tangible and measurable.

    Use the table below as an example.

    Goal/CSF KPI Metric
    Improve license visibility Increase accuracy and completeness of SAM data
    • % of total titles included in ITAM tool
    • % of licenses documented in ITAM tool
    Reduce software costs Reduce number of unused software licenses by 20%
    • % of licenses assigned to ex-employees
    • % of deployed licenses that have not been used in the past six months
    Reduce shadow IT Reduce number of unauthorized software purchases and installations by 10%
    • % of software requests made through unauthorized channels
    • % of software installed that is unauthorized

    Tailor metrics and reports to specific stakeholders

    Asset Managers

    Asset managers require data to manage how licenses are distributed throughout the organization. Are there multiple versions of the same application deployed? What proportion of licenses deployed are assigned to employees who are no longer at the organization? What are the usage patterns for applications?

    Service Desk Technicians

    Service desk technicians need real-time data on licenses currently available to deploy to machines that need to be imaged/updated, otherwise there is a risk of breaching a vendor agreement.

    Business Managers and Executives

    Business managers and executives need reports to make strategic decisions. The reports created for business stakeholders need to help them align business projects or business processes with SAM metrics. To determine which reports will provide the most value, start by looking at business goals and determining the tactical data that will help inform and support these goals and their progress.

    Additional reporting guidelines:

    • Dashboards should provide quick-glance information for daily maintenance.
    • Alerts should be set for all contract renewals to provide enough advanced notice (e.g. 90 days).
    • Reports should be automated to provide actionable information to appropriate stakeholders as needed.

    Define SAM reports to track metrics

    Associated Activity icon 1.2.3 Identify reports and metrics to track regularly

    Participants: CIO, IT Director, SAM Manager, SAM Team

    Document: Document in the Standard Operating Procedures.

    1. Identify key stakeholders requiring SAM reports. For each audience, identify their goals and requirements from reporting.
    2. Using the list of metrics identified previously, sort metrics into reports for each audience based on their requirements and goals. Add any additional metrics required.
    3. Identify a reporting frequency for each report.

    Example:

    Stakeholder Purpose Report Frequency
    Asset Manager
    • Manage budget
    • Manage contracts and cash flow
    • Ensure processes are being followed
    Operational budget spent to date Monthly
    Capital budget spent to date Monthly
    Contracts coming due for renewal Quarterly
    Software harvested for redeployment Quarterly
    Number of single applications being managed Annually
    CFO
    • Manage budget
    • Manage cash flow
    Software purchased, operational & capital Monthly
    Software accrued for future purchases Monthly
    Contracts coming due for renewal
    • Include dollar value, savings/spend
    Quarterly
    CIO
    • Resource planning
    • Progress reporting
    Software deployments and redeployments Monthly
    Software rollouts planned Quarterly
    % of applications patched Quarterly
    Money saved Annually
    Number of contracts & apps managed Quarterly

    Step 1.3 Plan the SAM program and budget

    Phase 1:
    Assess & Plan
    This step will walk you through the following activities:This step involves the following participants:

    1.1

    Assess current state
    • 1.3.1 Identify SAM functions to centralize vs. decentralize
    • 1.3.2 Complete the SAM budget tool
    • Project Sponsor
    • IT Director, CIO
    • IT Managers and SAM Manager
    • CFO

    1.2

    Build team and define metrics

    1.3

    Plan & budget

    Step Outcomes

    • Defined scope for the SAM program in terms of the degree of centralization of core functions and contracts
    • A clearer picture of software spend through the use of a SAM budgeting tool.

    Asset managers need to be involved in infrastructure projects at the decision-making stage

    Ensure that your software asset manager is at the table when making key IT decisions.

    Many infrastructure managers and business managers are unaware of how software licensing can impact projects. For example, changes in core infrastructure configuration can have big impacts from a software licensing perspective.

    Mini Case Study

    • When a large healthcare organization’s core infrastructure team decided to make changes to their environment, they failed to involve their asset manager in the decision-making process.
    • When the healthcare organization decided to make changes to their servers, they were running Oracle software on their servers, but the licenses were not being tracked.
    • When the change was being made to the servers, the business contacted Oracle to notify them of the change. What began as a tech services call quickly devolved into a licensing error; the vendor determined that the licenses deployed in the server environment were unauthorized.
    • For breaching the licensing agreement, Oracle fined the healthcare organization $250,000.
    • Had the asset manager been involved in the process, they would have understood the implications that altering the hardware configuration would have on the licensing agreement and a very expensive mistake could have been avoided.

    Decide on the degree of centralization for core SAM functions

    • Larger organizations with multiple divisions or business units will need to decide which SAM functions will be centralized and which, if any, will be decentralized as they plan the scope of their SAM program. Generally, certain core functions should be centralized for the SAM program to deliver the greatest benefits.
    • The degree of centralization may also be broken down by contract, with some contracts centralized and some decentralized.
    • A centralized SAM database gives needed visibility into software assets and licenses across the organization, but operation of the database may also be done locally.

    Centralization

    • Allows for more strategic planning
    • Visibility into software licenses across the organization promotes rationalization and cost savings
    • Ensure common products are used
    • More strategic sourcing of vendors and resellers
    • Centrally negotiate pricing for better deals
    • Easier to manage risk and prepare for audits
    • Greater coordination of resources

    Decentralization

    • May allow for more innovation
    • May be easier to demonstrate local compliance if the organization is geographically decentralized
    • May be easier to procure software if offices are in different countries
    • Deployment and installation of software on user devices may be easier

    Identify SAM functions to centralize vs. decentralize

    Associated Activity icon 1.3.1 Identify functions for centralization

    Participants: CIO, IT Director, SAM Manager, SAM Team

    Document: Document in the Standard Operating Procedures.

    1. If applicable, identify SAM functions that will need to be centralized and evaluate the implications of centralization to ensure it is feasible.
    2. If applicable, identify SAM functions that will be decentralized, if resources are available to manage those functions locally.

    Example:

    Centralized Functions
    • Operation of SAM database
    • SAM budget
    • Vendor selection
    • Contract negotiation and purchasing
    • Data analysis
    • Software receiving and inventory
    • Audits and risk management
    Decentralized functions
    • Procurement
    • Deployment and installation

    Software comprises the largest part of the infrastructure and operations budget

    After employee salaries (38%), the four next largest spend buckets have historically been infrastructure related. Adding salaries and external services, the average annual infrastructure and operations spend is over 50% of all IT spend.

    The largest portion of that spend is on software license and maintenance. As of 2016, software accounted for the roughly the same budget total as voice communications, data communications, and hardware combined. Managing software contracts is a crucial part of any mature budgeting process.

    Graph showing the percentage of all IT spend used for 'Ongoing software license and maintenance' annually. In 2010 it was 17%; in 2018 it was 21%. Graph showing the percentage of all IT spend used for 'Hardware maintenance / upgrades' annually. In 2010 it was 7%; in 2018 it was 8%. Graph showing the percentage of all IT spend used for 'Data communications' annually. In 2010 it was 7%; in 2018 it was 7%. Graph showing the percentage of all IT spend used for 'Voice communications' annually. In 2010 it was 5%; in 2018 it was 7%.

    Gain control of the budget to increase the success of SAM

    A sophisticated software asset management program will be able to uncover hidden costs, identify opportunities for rationalization, save money through reharvesting unused licenses, and improve forecasting of software usage to help control IT spending.

    While some asset managers may not have experience managing budgets, there are several advantages to the ITAM function owning the budget:

    • Be more involved in negotiating pricing with vendors.
    • Build better relationships with stakeholders across the business.
    • Gain greater purchasing power and have a greater influence on purchasing decisions.
    • Forecast software requirements more accurately.
    • Inform benchmarks and metrics with more data.
    • Directly impact the reduction in IT spend.
    • Manage the asset database more easily and have a greater understanding of software needs.
    • Identify opportunities for cost savings through rationalization.

    Examine your budget from a SAM perspective to optimize software spend

    How does examining your budget from a SAM perspective benefit the business?

    • It provides a chance to examine vendor contracts as they break down contracts by projects and services, which gives a clearer picture of where software fits into the budget.
    • It also gives organizations a chance to review vendor agreements and identify any redundancies present in software supporting services.

    Review the budget:

    • When reviewing your budget, implement a contingency fund to mitigate risk from a possible breach of compliance.
    • If your organization incurs compliance issues that relate to specific services, these fines may be relayed back to the departments that own those services, affecting how much money each department has.
    • The more sure you are of your compliance position, the less likely you are to need a contingency fund, and vice versa.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Finance needs to be involved. Their questions may cover:

    • Where are the monthly expenditures? Where are our financial obligations? Do we have different spending amounts based on what time of year it is?

    Use the SAM Budget Workbook to uncover insights about your software spend

    Supporting Tool icon 1.3.2 Complete the SAM budget tool

    The SAM Budget Workbook is designed to assist in developing and justifying the budget for software assets for the upcoming year.

    Instructions

    1. Work through tabs 2-6, following the instructions as you go.
    2. Tab 2 involves selecting software vendors and services provided by software.
    3. Tab 3 involves classifying services by vendor and assigning a cost to them. Tab 3 also allows you to classify the contract status.
    4. Tab 4 is a cost variance tracking sheet for software contracts.
    5. Tabs 5 and 6 are monthly budget sheets that break down software costs by vendor and service, respectively.
    6. Tab 7 provides graphs to analyze the data generated by the tool.
    7. Use the results found on tab 7 to analyze your budget: are you spending too much with one service? Is there vendor overlap based on what project or service that software is reporting?
    Screenshots of the 'Budget of Services Supported by Software Vendors' and 'Software Expense cashflow reports by Vendor' pages from the SAM Budget Workbook. Screenshot of the 'Analysis of Data' page from the SAM Budget Workbook.

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech Workshop Associated Activity icon

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    Photo of an Info-Tech analyst.
    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analyst will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech's historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    1.1.3

    Sample of activity 1.1.3 'Determine the maturity of your SAM program'. Determine the maturity of your SAM program

    Using the SAM Maturity Assessment Tool, fill out a series of questions in a survey to assess the maturity of your current SAM program. The survey assesses seven categories that will allow you to align your strategy to your results.

    1.2.3

    Sample of activity 1.2.3 'Define SAM reports to track metrics'. Define SAM reports to track metrics

    Identify key stakeholders with reporting needs, metrics to track to fulfill reporting requirements, and a frequency for producing reports.

    Phase 1 outline

    Associated Activity icon Call 1-888-670-8889 or email GuidedImplementations@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Complete these steps on your own, or call us to complete a guided implementation. A guided implementation is a series of 2-3 advisory calls that help you execute each phase of a project. They are included in most advisory memberships.

    Guided Implementation 1: Assess and Plan

    Proposed Time to Completion (in weeks): 4
    Step 1.1: Assess current state Step 1.2: Build team and define metrics Step 1.3: Plan and budget
    Start with an analyst kick-off call:
    • Outline SAM challenges
    • Overview of the project
    • Assess current maturity level
    Review findings with analyst:
    • Define roles and responsibilities of SAM staff
    • Identify metrics and reports to track
    Review findings with analyst:
    • Plan centralization of SAM program
    • Discuss SAM budgeting
    Then complete these activities…
    • Identify challenges
    • Identify objectives of SAM program
    • Assess maturity of current state
    Then complete these activities…
    • Define roles and responsibilities
    • Identify metrics and KPIs
    • Plan reporting
    Then complete these activities…
    • Identify SAM functions to centralize
    • Complete the SAM budgeting tool
    With these tools & templates:
    • SAM Maturity Assessment
    • Standard Operating Procedures
    With these tools & templates:
    • Standard Operating Procedures
    With these tools & templates:
    • SAM Budget Workbook

    Phase 2: Procure, Receive, and Deploy

    VISA used high-quality SAM data to optimize its software licensing

    Logo for VISA.

    Case Study

    Industry: Financial Services
    Source: SAM Summit 2014

    Challenge

    Visa formed a SAM team in 2011 to combat costly software audits.

    The team’s first task was to use the available SAM data and reconcile licenses deployed throughout the organization.

    Organizations as large as Visa constantly run into issues where they are grossly over or under licensed, causing huge financial risk.

    Solution

    Data collection and analysis were used as part of the license rationalization process. Using a variety of tools combined with a strong team allowed Visa to perform the necessary steps to gather license data and analyze usage.

    One of the key exercises was uniting procurement and deployment data and the teams responsible for each.

    End-to-end visibility allowed the data to be uniform. As a result, better decisions about license rationalization can be made.

    Results

    By improving its measurement of SAM data, Visa was able to dedicate more time to analyze and reconcile its licenses. This led to improved license management and negotiations that reflected actual usage.

    By improving license usage through rationalization, Visa reduced the cost of supporting additional titles.

    The SAM team also performed license reclamation to harvest and redistribute licenses to further improve usage. The team’s final task was to optimize audit responses.

    Step 2.1 Request and procure software

    Phase 2:
    Procure, Receive & Deploy
    This step will walk you through the following activities:This step involves the following participants:

    2.1

    Request & Procure
    • 2.1.1 Determine which software contracts should be centralized vs. localized
    • 2.1.2 Determine your software standards
    • 2.1.3 Define procurement policy
    • 2.1.4 Identify approvals and requests for authorization thresholds
    • 2.1.5 Build software procurement workflow for new contracts
    • 2.1.6 Define process for contract renewals and additional procurement scenarios
    • IT Director, CIO
    • IT Managers and SAM Manager
    • SAM Team

    2.2

    Receive & Deploy

    Step Outcomes

    • Defined standards for software requests
    • A documented policy for software procurement including authorization thresholds
    • Documented process workflows for new contracts and contract renewals

    Procurement and SAM teams must work together to optimize purchasing

    Procurement and SAM must collaborate on software purchases to ensure software purchases meet business requirements and take into account all data on existing software and licenses to optimize the purchase and contract. Failure to work together can lead to unnecessary software purchases, overspending on purchases, and undesirable contract terms.

    SAM managers must collaborate with Procurement when purchasing software.

    SAM managers should:

    • Receive requests for software licenses
    • Ensure a duplicate license isn’t already purchased before going through with purchase
    • Ensure the correct license is purchased for the correct individuals
    • Ensure the purchasing information is tracked in the ITAM/SAM tool
    • Report on software usage to inform purchases
    Two cartoon people in work attire each holding a piece of a puzzle that fits with the other. Procurement must commit to be involved in the asset management process.

    Procurement should:

    • Review requests and ensure all necessary approvals have been received before purchasing
    • Negotiate optimal contract terms
    • Track and manage purchasing information and invoices and handle financial aspects
    • Use data from SAM team on software usage to decide on contract terms and optimize value

    Centralize procurement to decrease the likelihood of overspending

    Centralized negotiation and purchasing of software can ensure that the SAM team has visibility and control over the procurement process to help prevent overspending and uncontrolled agreements.

    Benefits of centralized procurement

    • Ability to easily manage software demand.
    • Provides capability to effectively manage your relationships with suppliers.
    • Allows for decreased contract processing times.
    • Provides easy access to data with a single consolidated system for tracking assets at an early stage.
    • Reduces number of rogue purchases by individual departments.
    • Efficiency through automation and coordinated effort to examine organization’s compliance and license position.
    • Higher degree of visibility and transparency into asset usage in the organization.

    Info-Tech Insights

    It may be necessary to procure some software locally if organizations have multiple locations, but try to centrally procure and manage the biggest contracts from vendors that are likely to audit the organization. Even with a decentralized model, ensure all teams communicate and that contracts remain visible centrally even if managed locally.

    Standards for software procurement help prevent overspending

    Software procurement is often more difficult for organizations than hardware procurement because:

    • Key departments that need to be involved in the purchasing process do not communicate or interact enough.
    • A fear of software auditing causes organizations to overspend to mitigate risk.
    • Standards are often not in place, with most purchases being made outside of the gold imaging standard.
    • A lack of discovery results in gross overspending on software licenses that are already present and underused.

    Info-Tech Insight

    One of the major challenges involved in implementing SAM is uniting multiple datasets and data sources across the enterprise. A conversation with each major business unit will help with the creation of software procurement standards that are acceptable to all.

    Determine which software contracts should be centralized vs. localized (optional)

    Associated Activity icon 2.1.1 Identify central standard enterprise offerings

    Participants: CIO, IT Director, SAM Manager, SAM Team

    Document: Document in the Standard Operating Procedures.

    1. As a group, list as many software contracts that are in place across the organization as can easily be identified, focusing on top vendors.
    2. Identify which existing software contracts are standard enterprise offerings that are procured and managed centrally and which are non-standard or localized applications.
    3. Looking at the list of non-standard software, identify if any can or should be rationalized or replaced with a standard offering.
    Standard enterprise offerings
    • Microsoft
    • IBM
    • Adobe
    • Dell
    • Cisco
    • VMware
    • Barracuda
    Localized or non-standard software

    Classify your approved software into tiers to improve workflow efficiency

    Not all titles are created equal; classifying your pre-approved and approved software titles into a tiered system will provide numerous benefits for your SAM program.

    The more prestigious the asset tier, the higher the degree of data capture, support, and maintenance required.

    • Mission-critical, high-priority applications are classified as gold standard.
    • Secondary applications or high priority are silver standard.
    • Low-usage applications or normal priority are bronze standard.

    E.g. An enterprise application that needs to be available 24/7, such as a learning management system, should be classified as a gold tier to ensure it has 24/7 support.

    Creating tiers assists stakeholders in justifying the following set of decision points:

    • Which assets will require added maintenance (e.g. software assurance for Microsoft)
    • Technical support requirements to meet business requirements
    • Lifecycle and upgrade cycle of the software assets.
    • Monitoring usage to determine whether licenses can be harvested
    • Authorizations required for purchase requests

    Determine your software standards

    Associated Activity icon 2.1.2 Identify standard software images for your organization

    Participants: Asset Manager, Purchasing, Service Desk Manager, Operations (optional)

    Document: Document in the Standard Operating Procedures.

    1. As a group, discuss and identify the relevant software asset tiers and number of tiers.
    2. For each tier, define:
      • Support requirements (hours and payments)
      • Maintenance requirements (mandatory or optional)
      • Lifecycle (when to upgrade, when to patch)
      • Financial requirements (CapEx/OpEx expenses)
      • Request authorizations (requestors and approvers)
    3. Sort the software contracts identified in the previous category into tiers, for example:
      • Mission-critical software (gold tier)
      • High-priority software (silver tier)
      • Normal-priority software (bronze tier)
    4. Use the SOP as an example.

    Determine which licensing options and methodologies fit into future IT strategy

    Not everyone is ready to embrace the cloud for all solutions; make sure to align cloud strategy to business requirements. Work closely with IT executives to determine appropriate contract terms, licensing options, and tracking processes.

    Vendors make changes to bundles and online services terms on a regular basis. Ensure you document your agreed upon terms to save your required functionality as vendor standard offerings change.

    • Any contracts getting moved to the cloud will need to undergo a contract comparison first.
    • The contract you signed last month could be completely different this month. Many cloud contracts are dynamic in nature.
    • Keep a copy of the electronic contract that you signed in a secure, accessible location.
    • Consider reaching a separate agreement with the vendor that they will ensure you maintain the results of the original agreement to prevent scope creep.

    Not all on-premises to cloud options transition linearly:

    • Features of perpetual licenses may not map to subscriptions
    • Product terms may differ from online services terms
    • Licensing may change from per device to per user
    • Vendor migrations may be more complex than anticipated

    Download the Own the Cloud: Strategy and Action Plan blueprint for more guidance

    Understand the three primary models of software usage agreements

    Licensed Open Source Shareware
    License Structure A software supplier is paid for the permission to use their software. The software is provided free of charge, but is still licensed. The software is provided free of charge, but is still licensed. Usage may be on a trial basis, with full usage granted after purchase.
    Source Code The source code is still owned by the supplier. Source code is provided, allowing users to change and share the software to suit their needs. Source code is property of the original developer/supplier.
    Technical Support Technical support is included in the price of the contract. Technical support may be provided, often in a community-based format from other developers of the open-source software in question. Support may be limited during trial of software, but upgraded once a purchase is made.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Open-source software should be managed in the same manner as commercial software to understand licensing requirements and be aware of any changes to these agreements, such as commercialization of such products, as well as any rules surrounding source code.

    Coordinate with purchasing department to define software procurement policy

    Associated Activity icon 2.1.3 Define procurement policy

    Participants: Asset Manager, Purchasing, Service Desk Manager, Operations (optional)

    Document: Document in the Standard Operating Procedures.

    Define and document policies that will apply to IT software purchases, including policies around:

    • Software purchase approvals
    • Licenses for short-term contractors
    • On-premises vs. SaaS purchases
    • Shareware and freeware fees
    • Open-source software

    Use the example below as guidance and document in the SOP.

    • Software will not be acquired through user corporate credit cards, office supply, petty cash, or personal expense budgets. Purchases made outside of the acceptable processes will not be reimbursed and will be removed from company computers.
    • Contractors who are short term and paid through vendor contracts and invoices will supply their own licenses.
    • Software may be purchased as on-premises or as-a-service solutions as IT deems appropriate for the solution.
    • Shareware and freeware authors will be paid the fee they specify for use of their products.
    • Open-source software will be managed in the same manner as commercial software to understand licensing requirements and be aware of any changes to these agreements, such as commercialization of such products.

    Identify approvals and requests for authorization thresholds

    Associated Activity icon 2.1.4 Identify financial thresholds for approvals and requests

    Participants: Asset Manager, Purchasing, CIO, CFO, IT Director

    Document: Document in the Standard Operating Procedures.

    Identify and classify financial thresholds for contracts requiring approval. For each category of contract value, identify who needs to authorize the request. Discuss and document any other approvals necessary. An example is provided below.

    Example:
    Requests for authorization will need to be directed based on the following financial thresholds:

    Contract value Authorization
    <$50,000 IT Director
    $50,000 to $250,000 CIO
    $250,000 to $500,000 CIO and CFO
    >$500,000 Legal review

    Develop a defined process for software procurement

    A poorly defined software procurement workflow can result in overspending on unnecessary software licensing throughout the year. This can impact budgeting and any potential software refreshes, as businesses will often rely on purchasing what they can afford, not what they need.

    Benefits of a defined workflow

    • Standardized understanding of the authorization processes results in reduced susceptibility to errors and quicker processing times.
    • Compliance with legal regulations.
    • Protection from compliance violations.
    • Transparency with the end user by communicating the process of software procurement to the business.

    Elements to include in procurement workflows:

    • RFP
    • Authorizations and approvals
    • Contract review
    • Internal references to numbers, cost centers, locations, POs, etc.

    Four types of procurement workflows:

    1. New contract – Purchasing brand new software
    2. Add to contract – Adding new POs or line items to an existing contract
    3. Contract renewal – Renewing an existing contract
    4. No contract required – Smaller purchases that don’t require a signed contract

    Outline the procurement process for new contracts

    The procurement workflow may involve the Service Desk, procurement team, and asset manager.

    The following elements should be accounted for:

    • Assignee
    • Requestor
    • Category
    • Type
    • Model or version
    • Requisition number
    • Purchase order number
    • Unit price
    A flowchart outlining the procurement process for new contracts. There are three levels, at the top is 'Tier 2 or Tier 3', the middle is 'IT Procurement', the bottom is 'Asset Manager'. It begins in 'Tier 2 or Tier 3' with 'Approved request received', and if it is not declined it moves on to 'Purchasing request forwarded to Procurement' on the 'IT Procurement' level. If an RFP is required, it eventually moves to 'Receives contract' on the 'Asset Manager' level and ends with 'Document license requirements, notify IT Product Owner'.

    Build software procurement workflow for new contracts

    Associated Activity icon 2.1.5 Build new contract procurement workflow

    Participants: Asset Manager, Purchasing, Service Desk Manager, Operations (optional)

    Document: Document in the Standard Operating Procedures.

    1. As a team, outline each of the tasks in the process of procuring a new software asset using cue cards, sticky notes, or a whiteboard.
    2. Use the sample procurement workflow on the previous slide as an example if needed.
    3. Ensure the following elements required for the asset procurement process have been accounted for:
      • Assignee
      • Requestor
      • Category
      • Type
      • Model or version
      • Requisition number
      • Purchase order number
      • Unit price
    4. Review the workflow and make any adjustments necessary to improve the process. Document using Visio and add to the SOP.

    Review vendor contracts to right-size licensing procurement

    Many of your applications come from the same vendor, and a view into the business services provided by each software vendor contract will prove beneficial to the business.

    • You may uncover overlaps in services provided by software across departments.
    • The same service may be purchased from different vendors simply because two departments never compared notes!
    • This leaves a lot of money on the table from a lack of volume discounts.
    A graphic depicting a Venn diagram in which the 'Software' and 'Services' circles overlap, both of which stem from a 'Vendor Contract'.
    • Be cautious about approaching license budgeting strictly from a cost perspective. SAM is designed to right-size your licenses to properly support your organization.
    • One trap organizations often fall into is bundling discounts. Vendors will offer steep discounts if clients purchase multiple titles. On the surface, this might seem like a great offer.
    • However, what often happens is that organizations will bundle titles to get a steep discount on their prize title of the group.
    • The other titles become shelfware, and when the time comes to renew the contract, the maintenance fees on the shelfware titles will often make the contract more expensive than if only the prize title was purchased.

    Additionally, information regarding what licenses are being used for certain services may yield insight into potential redundancies. For example, two separate departments may have each have a different application deployed that supports the same service. This presents an opportunity for savings based on bulk licensing agreements, not to mention a simplified support environment by reducing the number of titles deployed in your environment.

    Define a procedure for tracking and negotiating contract renewals

    Participants: IT Director/CIO, Asset Manager, Purchasing, Service Desk Manager, Operations (optional)

    Document: Document in the Standard Operating Procedures.

    Discuss and document a policy for tracking and negotiating contract renewals. Answer the following questions as guides:

    • How will renewal dates be tracked and monitored?
    • How soon should contracts be reviewed prior to renewal to determine appropriateness for use and compliance?
    • What criteria will be used to determine if the product should be renewed?
    • Who will be consulted for contract renewal decisions for major contracts?
    • How will licensing and support decisions be made?

    Optional contract review:

    1. Take a sample contract to renew. Create a list of services that are supported by the software. Look for overlaps, redundancies, shelfware, and potential bundling opportunities. Recall the issues outlined when purchasing bundled software.
    2. Create a list of action items to bring into the next round of contract negotiations with that vendor and identify a start date to begin reviewing these items.

    Define process for contract renewals and additional procurement scenarios

    Associated Activity icon 2.1.6 Build additional procurement workflows

    Participants: Asset Manager, Purchasing, Service Desk Manager, Operations (optional)

    Document: Document in the Standard Operating Procedures.

    Build procurement workflows and define policies and procedures for additional purchasing scenarios beyond new contracts.

    This may include:

    1. Contract renewals
    2. Single purchase, non-contract procurement
    3. Adding to contracts

    Use the sample workflows in the Standard Operating Procedures as a guide.

    A flowchart outlining the procurement process for 'Software Contract Renewal'.

    A flowchart outlining the procurement process for 'Software single purchase, non-contract'.

    Negotiate for value to ensure quality license agreements

    Approach negotiating from a value-first, price-second perspective.

    Contract negotiations too often come down to a question of price. While you want to avoid overpaying for licenses, a worse offense is getting a steep discount for a bundle of applications where the majority will go unused.

    Vendors will try to sell a full stack of software at a steep discount to give the illusion of value. Often organizations bite off more than they can chew. When auditors come knocking, the business may be in compliance, but being over-licensed is a dangerous state to be in. Organizations end up over-licensed and in possession of numerous “shelfware” apps that sit on the proverbial shelf collecting dust while drawing expensive maintenance and licensing fees from the business.
    • Pressure from the business is also an issue. Negotiations can be rushed in an effort to fulfill an immediate need.
    • Make sure you clearly outline the level of compliance expected from the vendor.
    • Negotiate reduced-fee software support services. Your Service Desk can already handle the bulk of requests, and investing in a mature Service Desk will provide more lasting value than paying for expensive maintenance and support services that largely go unused.

    Learn to negotiate effectively to optimize contract renewals

    Leverage Info-Tech’s research, Master Contract Review and Negotiation for Software Agreements, to review your software contracts to leverage your unique position during negotiations and find substantial cost savings.

    This blueprint includes the following tools and templates:

    • RASCI Chart
    • Vendor Communication Management Plan
    • Software Business Use Case Template
    • SaaS TCO Calculator
    • Software Terms & Conditions Evaluation Tool
    • Software Buyer’s Checklist
    • Controlled Vendor Communications Letter
    • Key Vendor Fiscal Year End Calendar
    • Contract Negotiation Tactics Playbook

    Step 2.2 Receive and deploy software

    Phase 2:
    Procure, Receive & Deploy
    This step will walk you through the following activities:This step involves the following participants:

    2.1

    Request & Procure
    • 2.2.1 Identify storage locations for software information and media
    • 2.2.2 Design the workflow for receiving software
    • 2.2.3 Design and document the deployment workflow(s)
    • 2.2.4 Create a list of pre-approved, approved, and unapproved software titles
    • 2.2.5 Document the request and deployment process for non-standard software requests
    • IT Director, CIO
    • IT Managers and SAM Manager
    • SAM Team
    • Purchasing (optional)
    • Service Desk Manager (optional)
    • Operations (optional)
    • Release & Deployment manager (optional)

    2.2

    Receive & Deploy

    Step Outcomes

    • A strategy for storing software information and media in the ITAM database and DML
    • A documented workflow for the software receiving process
    • Documented process workflows for software requests and deployment, including for large quantities of software
    • A list of pre-approved, approved, and unapproved software titles for deployment
    • A process for responding to non-standard software requests

    Verify product and information upon receipt

    Upon receipt of procured software:

    • Verify that the product is correct
    • Reconcile with purchase record to ensure the order has been completed
    • Verify that the invoice is correct
    • Update financial information such as budget and accounting records
    • Update ITAM database to show status as received
    • Record/attach license keys and software codes in ITAM database
    • Attach relevant documents to record in the ITAM database (license reports, invoices, end-user agreement, etc.)
    • Download and store any installation files, DVDs, and CDs
    • Once software has been installed, verify license is matched to discovered installed software within the ITAM database

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    While most software will be received through email and download, in some cases physical software may be received through courier or mail. Ensure processes and procedures are defined for both cases.

    Establish a secure repository for licenses and documentation

    All licenses, documentation, and digital media for authorized and supported software should be collected and stored in a central, secure location to minimize risk of theft, loss, or unauthorized installation or duplication of software.

    Where to store software data?

    The ITAM database should contain an up-to-date record of all software assets, including their associated:

    • Serial numbers
    • License keys and codes
    • Contracts and agreements

    The database allows you to view software that is installed and associated licenses.

    A definitive media library (DML) is a single logical storage area, which may consist of one or more locations in which definitive authorized versions of all software configuration items are securely stored and protected.

    The DML consists of file storage as well as physical storage of CDs and DVDs and must be continually updated to contain the latest information about each configuration item.

    The DML is used to organize content and link to automated deployment to easily install software.

    Use a definitive media library (DML) to assist in storage of software packages for deployment

    The DML will usually contain the most up-to-date versions to minimize errors created by having unauthorized, old, or problematic software releases being deployed into the live IT environment. The DML can be used for both full-packed product (FPP) software and in-house developed software, providing formalized data around releases of in-house software.

    The DML should consist of two main storage areas:

    1. Secure file storage
    2. Secure physical storage for any master CD/DVDs

    Additional Recommendations:

    • The process of building, testing, adapting, and final pre-production testing should provide your IT department with a solid final deployment package, but the archive will enable you to quickly pull in a previous version if necessary.
    • When upgrading software packages to include new patches or configurations, use the DML to ensure you're referencing a problem-free version.
    • Include the DML in your disaster recovery plan (DRP) and include testing of the DML as part of your DRP testing. If you need to rebuild servers from these files, offsite, you'll want to know your backup DML is sound.

    Ensure you have a strategy to create and update your DML

    Your DML should have a way to separate archived, new, and current software to allow for optimal organization of files and code, to ensure the correct software is installed, and to prepare for automated deployment through the service catalog.

    New software hasn’t been tested yet. Make it available for testing, but not widely available.

    Keep a record for archived software, but do not make it available for install.

    Current software is regularly used and should be available for install.

    Deployment

    • Are you using tools to integrate with the DML for deployment?
    • Store files that are ready for automated deployment in a separate location.

    Identify storage locations for software information and media

    Associated Activity icon 2.2.1 Identify software storage locations

    Participants: Asset Manager, IT Director

    Document: Document in the Standard Operating Procedures.

    1. Identify storage locations for asset data that is received (i.e. ITAM database, DML).
    2. Identify information that should be stored with each asset (i.e. license, serial number, invoice, end-user license agreement) and where this information should be stored.
    3. Identify fields that should be populated in the DML for each record:
      • Product name
      • Version
      • Description
      • Authorized by
      • Received by/date
      • Configuration item on which asset is installed
      • Media
      • Physical and backup locations
      • Verified by/date

    Define the standard process for receiving software

    Define the following in your receiving process:

    • Process for software received by email/download
    • Process for physical material received at Service Desk
    • Information to be recorded and where
    • Process following discrepancy of received software
    A flowchart outlining the standard process for receiving software. There are two levels, at the top is 'Desktop Support Team' and the bottom is 'Procurement'. It begins in 'Desktop Support Team' with 'Received at Service Desk' or 'Receive by email/download'. If the reconciliation is correct it eventually moves on to 'Fulfill service request, deliver and close ticket'. If the reconciliation is not correct it moves to 'Contact vendor with discrepancy details' in 'Procurement'. If a return is required 'Repackage and ship', or if not 'Notify Desktop Support Team of resolution'.

    Design the workflow for receiving software

    Associated Activity icon 2.2.2 Design the workflow for receiving software

    Participants: Asset Manager, Purchasing, Service Desk Manager, Operations (optional)

    Document: Document in the Standard Operating Procedures.

    Option 1: Whiteboard

    1. Discuss the workflow and draw it on the whiteboard.
    2. Assess whether you are using the best workflow. Modify it if necessary.
    3. Use the sample workflow from this step as a guide if starting from scratch.
    4. Engage the team in refining the process workflow.
    5. Transfer data to Visio and add to the SOP.

    Option 2: Tabletop Exercise

    1. Distribute index cards to each member of the team.
    2. Have each person write a single task they perform on the index card. Be granular. Include the title or the name of the person responsible.
    3. Mark cards that are decision points. Use a card of a different color or use a marker to make a colored dot.
    4. Arrange the index cards in order, removing duplicates.
    5. Assess whether you are using the best workflow. Engage the team to refine it if necessary.
    6. Transfer data to Visio and add to the SOP.

    Build release management into your software deployment process

    A sound software deployment process is tied to sound release management practices.

    Releases: A collection of authorized changes to an IT service. Releases are divided into:

    • Major software releases/upgrades: Normally containing large areas of new functionality, some of which may make intervening fixes to redundant problems.
    • Minor software releases/upgrades: Normally containing small enhancements and fixes, some of which may have already been issued as emergency fixes.
    • Emergency software fixes: Contain the corrections to a small number of known problems.

    Ensure that release management processes work with SAM processes:

    • If a release will impact licensing, the SAM manager must be made aware to make any necessary adjustments.
    • Deployment models should be in line with SAM strategy (i.e. is software rolled out to everyone or individually when upgrades are needed?).
    • How will user requests for upgrades be managed?
    • Users should be on the same software version to ensure file compatibility and smooth patch management.
    • Ideally, software should be no more than two versions back.

    Document the process workflow for software deployment

    Define the process for deploying software to users.

    Include the following in your workflow:

    • All necessary approvals
    • Source of software
    • Process for standard vs. non-standard software requests
    • Update ITAM database once software has been installed with license data and install information
    A flowchart outlining the process workflow for software deployment. There are four levels, at the top is 'Business', then 'Desktop Support Team', 'Procurement', and the bottom is 'Asset Manager'. It begins in 'Business' with 'Request for software', and if it is approved by the manager it moves to 'Check DB: Can a volume serial # be used?' in 'Desktop Support Team'. If yes, it eventually moves on to 'Close ticket' on the same level, if not it eventually moves to 'Initiate procurement process' in 'Procurement', 'Initiate receiving process' in 'Asset Manager', and finally to 'Run quarterly license review to purchase volume licenses'.

    Large-scale software rollouts should be run as projects

    Rollouts or upgrades of large quantities of software will likely be managed as projects.

    These projects should include project plans, including resources, timelines, and detailed procedures.

    Define the process for large-scale deployment if it will differ from the regular deployment process.

    A flowchart outlining large-scale software rollouts. There are three levels, at the top is 'IT Procurement', then 'Asset Manager', and the bottom is 'Software Packager'. It begins in 'IT Procurement' with 'Project plan approved', and if a bid is not required it skips to 'Sign contract/Create purchase order'. This eventually moves to 'Receive access to eLicense site/receive access to new product' in 'Asset Manager', and either to 'Approve invoice for payment, forward to accounting' on the same level or to 'Download software, license keys' in 'Software Packager' then eventually to 'Deploy'.

    Design and document the deployment workflow(s)

    Associated Activity icon 2.2.3 Document deployment workflows for desktop and large-scale deployment

    Participants: Asset Manager, Service Desk Manager, Release & Deployment Manager

    Document: Document in the Standard Operating Procedures.

    1. Outline each step in the process of software deployment using notecards or on a whiteboard. Be as granular as possible. On each card, describe the step and the individual responsible for each step.
      • Be sure to identify the type of release for standard software releases and patches.
      • Additionally, identify how additional software outside the scope of the base image will be addressed.
    2. When you are satisfied that each step is accurately captured, use a second color of notecard to document any challenges, inefficiencies, or pains associated with each step. Consider further documenting the time on each task.
    3. Examine each challenge or pain point. Discuss whether there is a clear solution to the problem. If so, document the solution and amend the workflow. If not, engage in a broader discussion of possible solutions, considering people, processes, and available technology.
    4. Document separately the process for large-scale software deployment if required.

    Develop standards to streamline your software estate

    Software should be approved and deployed based on approved standards to minimize over-deployed software and manage costs appropriately. A list of standard software improves the efficiency of the software approval process.

    • Pre-approved titles include basic platforms like Office or Adobe Reader that are often available in enterprise-wide license packages.
    • Approved titles include popular titles with license numbers that need to be managed on a role-by-role basis. For example, if most of your marketing team uses the Adobe Creative Suite, a user still needs to get approval before they can get a license.
    • Unapproved titles are managed on a case-by-case basis and are up to the discretion of the asset manager and other involved parties.

    Additionally, create a list of unauthorized software including titles not to be installed under any circumstances. This list should be designed with feedback from your end users and technical support staff. Front-line knowledge is crucial to identifying which titles are causing major problems.

    Create a list of pre-approved, approved, and unapproved software titles

    Associated Activity icon 2.2.4 Determine software categories for deployment

    Participants: IT Director, Asset Manager, Purchasing (optional), Service Desk Manager (optional), Release & Deployment Manager (optional)

    Document: Document in the Standard Operating Procedures.

    1. Define software categories that will be used to build software standards.
    2. Include definitions of each category.
    3. Add examples of software to each category to begin building list of approved software titles for deployment.

    Use the following example as a guide.

    Category Definition Software titles
    Pre-approved/standard
    • Supported and approved for install for all end users
    • Included on most, if not all devices
    • Typically installed as a base image
    • Microsoft Office (Outlook, Word, Excel, PowerPoint)
    • Adobe Reader
    • Windows
    Approved by role
    • Supported and approved for install, but only for certain groups of end users
    • Popular titles with license numbers that need to be managed on a role-by-role basis
    • Pre-approved for purchase with business manager’s approval
    • Adobe Creative Cloud Suite
    • Adobe Acrobat Pro
    • Microsoft Visio
    Unapproved/requires review
    • Not previously approved or installed by IT
    • Special permission required for installation based on demonstrable business need
    • Managed on a case-by-case basis
    • Up to the discretion of the asset manager and other involved parties
    • Dynamics
    • Zoom Text
    • Adaptive Insights
    Unauthorized
    • Not to be installed under any circumstances
    • Privately owned software
    • Pirated copies of any software titles
    • Internet downloads

    Define the review and approval process for non-standard software

    Software requiring review will need to be managed on a case-by-case basis, with approval dependent on software evaluation and business need.

    The evaluation and approval process may require input from several parties, including business analysts, Security, technical team, Finance, Procurement, and the manager of the requestor’s department.

    A flowchart outlining the review and approval process for non-standard software. There are five levels, at the top is 'Business Analyst/Project Manager', then 'Security Team', 'Technical Team', 'Financial & Contract Review' and the bottom is 'Procurement'. It begins in 'Business Analyst/Project Manager' with 'Request for non-standard software', and if the approved product is available it moves to 'Evaluate tool for security, data, and privacy compliance' in 'Security Team'. If more evaluation is necessary it moves to 'Evaluate tool for infrastructure and integration requirements' in 'Technical Team', and then 'Evaluate terms and conditions' in 'Financial & Contract Review'. At any point in the evaluation process it can move back to the 'Business Analyst/Project Manager' level for 'Assemble requirements details', and finally down to the 'Procurement' level for 'Execute purchase'.

    Document the request and deployment process for non-standard software

    Associated Activity icon 2.2.5 Document process for non-standard software requests

    Participants: Asset Manager, Service Desk Manager, Release & Deployment Manager

    Document: Document in the Standard Operating Procedures.

    Define the review and approval process for non-standard software requests.

    Use the workflow on the previous slide as a guide to map your own workflow process and document the steps in the Standard Operating Procedures.

    The following assessments may need to be included in the process:

    • Functionality and use requirements: May include suggestion back to the business before proceeding any further to see if similar, already approved software could be used in its place.
    • Technical specifications: Cloud, data center, hardware, backups, integrations (Active Directory, others), file, and program compatibility.
    • Security: Security team may need to assess to ensure nothing will install that will compromise data or systems security.
    • Privacy policy: Security and compliance team may need to evaluate the solution to ensure data will be secured and accessed only by authorized users.
    • Terms and conditions: The contracts team may evaluate terms and conditions to ensure contracts and end-user agreements do not violate existing standards.
    • Accessibility and compliance: Software may be required to meet accessibility requirements in accordance with company policies.

    BMW deployed a global data centralization program to achieve 100% license visibility

    Logo for BMW.

    Case Study

    Industry: Financial Services
    Source: SAM Summit 2014

    Challenge

    BMW is a large German automotive manufacturer that employs over 100,000 people. It has over 7,000 software products deployed across 106,000 clients and servers in over 150 countries.

    When the global recession hit in 2008, the threat of costly audits increased, so BMW decided to boost its SAM program to cut licensing costs. It sought to centralize inventory data from operations across the globe.

    Solution

    A new SAM office was established in 2009 in Germany. The SAM team at BMW began by processing all the accumulated license and installation data from operations in Germany, Austria, and the UK. Within six months, the team had full visibility of all licenses and software assets.

    Compliance was also a priority. The team successfully identified where they could make substantial reductions in support and maintenance costs as well as remove surplus costs associated with duplicate licensing.

    Results

    BMW overcame a massive data centralization project to achieve 100% visibility of its global licensing estate, an incredible achievement given the scope of the operation.

    BMW experienced efficiency gains due to transparency and centralized management of licenses through the new SAM office.

    Additionally, internal investment in training and technical knowledge has helped BMW continuously improve the program. This has resulted in ongoing cost reductions for the manufacturer.

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech Workshop Associated Activity icon

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    Photo of an Info-Tech analyst.
    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analyst will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech's historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    2.1.5

    Sample of activity 2.1.5 'Build software procurement workflow for new contracts'. Build software procurement workflow for new contracts

    Use the sample workflow to document your own process for procurement of new software contracts.

    2.2.4

    Sample of activity 2.2.4 'Create a list of pre-approved, approved, and unapproved software titles'. Create a list of pre-approved, approved, and unapproved software titles

    Build definitions of software categories to inform software standards and brainstorm examples of each category.

    Phase 2 outline

    Associated Activity icon Call 1-888-670-8889 or email GuidedImplementations@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Complete these steps on your own, or call us to complete a guided implementation. A guided implementation is a series of 2-3 advisory calls that help you execute each phase of a project. They are included in most advisory memberships.

    Guided Implementation 2: Procure, receive, and deploy

    Proposed Time to Completion (in weeks): 6
    Step 2.1: Request and procureStep 2.2: Receive and deploy
    Start with an analyst kick-off call:
    • Define standards for software requests
    • Build procurement policy
    • Define procurement processes
    Review findings with analyst:
    • Build processes for software receiving
    • Build processes for software requests and deployment
    • Define process for non-standard requests
    Then complete these activities…
    • Determine software standards
    • Define procurement policy
    • Identify authorization thresholds
    • Build procurement workflows for new contracts and renewals
    Then complete these activities…
    • Identify storage locations for software information
    • Design workflow for receiving software
    • Design workflow for software deployment
    • Create a list of approved and non-standard requests
    • Define process for non-standard requests
    With these tools & templates:
    • Standard Operating Procedures
    With these tools & templates:
    • Standard Operating Procedures

    Phase 3: Manage, Redeploy, and Retire

    Step 3.1 Manage and maintain software contracts

    Phase 3:
    Manage, Redeploy & Retire
    This step will walk you through the following activities:This step involves the following participants:

    3.1

    Manage & Maintain Software
    • 3.1.1 Define process for conducting software inventory
    • 3.1.2 Define policies for software maintenance and patches
    • 3.1.3 Document your patch management policy
    • IT Director, CIO
    • IT Managers and SAM Manager
    • SAM Team
    • Release Manager (optional)
    • Security (optional)

    3.2

    Harvest, Redeploy, or Retire

    Step Outcomes

    • A process for conducting regular software inventory checks and analyzing the data to continually manage software assets and license compliance.
    • An understanding of software maintenance requirements
    • A policy for conducting regular software maintenance and patching
    • A documented patch management policy

    Manage your software licenses to decrease your risk of overspending

    Many organizations fail to track their software inventory effectively; the focus often remains on hardware due to its more tangible nature. However, annual software purchases often account for a higher IT spend than annual hardware purchases, so it’s important to track both.

    Benefits of managing software licenses

    • Better control of the IT footprint. Many companies already employ hardware asset management, but when they employ SAM, there is potential to save millions of dollars through optimal use of all technology assets.
    • Better purchasing decisions and negotiating leverage. Enhanced visibility into actual software needs means not only can companies procure and deploy the right increments of software in the right areas, but they can also do so more cost-effectively through tools such as volume purchase agreements or bundled services.
    • No refund policy combined with shelfware (software that sits unused “on the shelf”) is where software companies make their money.
    • Managing licenses will help prevent costly audit penalties. Special attention should be paid to software purchased from large vendors such as Microsoft, Oracle, Adobe, SAP, or IBM.

    Maintain a comprehensive, up-to-date software inventory to manage licenses effectively

    A clearly defined process for inventory management will reduce the risk of over buying licenses and falling out of compliance.

    • A detailed software inventory and tracking system should act as a single point of contact for all your license data.
    • Maintain a comprehensive inventory of installed software through complete and accurate records of all licenses, certifications, and software purchase transactions, storing these in a secure repository.
    • Periodically review installed software and accompanying licenses to ensure only legal and supported software is in use and to ensure ongoing compliance with the software management policy.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Have and maintain a list of supported software to guide what new software will be approved for purchase and what current software should be retained on the desktops, servers, and other processing devices.

    Conduct a baseline inventory of deployed software to know what you have

    You have to know what you have before you can manage it.

    A baseline inventory tells you exactly what software you have deployed and where it is being used. This can help to determine how to best optimize software and license usage.

    A software inventory will allow you to:

    • Identify all software residing on computers.
    • Compare existing software to the list of supported software.
    • Identify and delete illegal or unsupported software.
    • Identify and stop software use that violates license agreements, copyright law, or organizational policies.

    Two methods for conducting a software inventory:

    1. If you have several computers to analyze, use automated tools to conduct inventory for greater accuracy and efficiency. Software inventory or discovery tools scan installed software and generate inventory reports, while asset management tools will help you manage that data.
    2. Manual inventory may be possible if your organization has few computers.

    How to conduct a manual software inventory:

    1. Record serial number of device being analyzed.
    2. Record department and employee to whom the computer is assigned.
    3. Inspect contents of hard drive and/or server to identify software as well as hidden files and directories.
    4. Record licensing information for software found on workstation and server.
    5. Compare findings with list of supported software and licenses stored in repository.

    Keep the momentum going through regular inventory and licensing checks

    Take preventive action to avoid unauthorized software usage through regular software inventory and license management:

    • Regularly update the list of supported software and authorized use.
    • Monitor and optimize software license usage.
    • Continually communicate with and train employees around software needs and policies.
    • Maintain a regular inventory schedule to keep data up to date and remain compliant with licensing requirements – your specific schedule will depend on the size of the company and procurement schedule.
    • Conduct random spot inventories – even if you are using a tool, periodic spot checks should still be performed to ensure accuracy of inventory.
    • Periodically review software procurement records and ensure procurement process is being followed.
    • Continuously monitor software installations on networked computers through automated tools.
    • Ensure software licensing documentation and data is secure.

    Define process for conducting software inventory

    Associated Activity icon 3.1.1 Define process for regular software inventory

    Participants: IT Director, Asset Manager

    Document: Document in the Standard Operating Procedures.

    1. If a baseline software inventory has not been conducted, discuss and document a plan for completing the inventory.
      • Will the inventory be conducted manually or through automated tools?
      • If manually, what information will be collected and recorded? Which devices will be analyzed? Where will data be stored?
      • If automatically, which tools will be used? Will any additional information need to be collected? Who will have access to the inventory?
      • When will the inventory be conducted and by whom?
        • Monthly inventory may be required if there is a lot of change and movement, otherwise quarterly is usually sufficient.
    2. Document how inventory data will be analyzed.
      • How will data be compared against supported software?
      • How will software violations be addressed?
    3. Develop a plan for continual inventory spot checks and maintenance.
      • How often will inventory be conducted and/or analyzed?
      • How often will spot checks be performed?

    Don’t forget that software requires maintenance

    While maintenance efforts are typically focused around hardware, software maintenance – including upgrades and patches – must be built into the software asset management process to ensure software remains compliant with security and regulatory requirements.

    Software maintenance guidelines:

    • Maintenance agreements should be stored in the ITAM database.
    • Software should be kept as current as possible. It is recommended that software remain no more than two versions off.
    • Unsupported software should be uninstalled or upgraded as required.
    • Upgrades should be tested, especially for high-priority or critical applications or if integrated with other applications.
    • Change and release management best practices should be applied for all software upgrades and patches.
    • A process should be defined for how often patches will be applied to end-user devices.

    Integrate patch management with your SAM practice to improve security and reduce downtime

    The integration between patch management and asset management is incredibly valuable from a technology point of view. IT asset management (ITAM) tools create reports on the characteristics of deployed software. By combining these reports with a generalized software updater, you can automate most simple patches to save your team’s efforts for more-critical incidents. Usage reports can also help determine which applications should be reviewed and removed from the environment.

    • In recent years, patch management has grown in popularity due to widespread security threats, the resultant downtime, and expenses associated with them.
    • The main objective of patch management is to create a consistently configured environment that is secure against known vulnerabilities in operating systems and application software.

    Assessing new patches should include questions such as:

    • What’s the risk of releasing the patch? What is the criticality of the system? What end users will be affected?
    • How will we manage business disruption during an incident caused by a failed patch deployment?
    • In the event of service outage as a result of a failed patch deployment, how will we recover services effectively in business priority order?
    • What’s the risk of expediting the patch? Of not releasing the patch at all?

    Define policies for software maintenance and patches

    Associated Activity icon 3.1.2 Define software maintenance and patching policies

    Participants: IT Director, Asset Manager, Release Manager (optional), Security (optional)

    Document: Document in the Standard Operating Procedures.

    Software maintenance:

    Review the software maintenance guidelines in this section and in the SOP template. Discuss each policy and revise and document in accordance with your policies.

    Patch management:

    Discuss and document patch management policies:

    1. How often will end-user devices receive patches?
    2. How often will servers be patched?
    3. How will patches be prioritized? See example below.
      • Critical patches will be applied within two days of release, with testing prioritized to meet this schedule.
      • High-priority patches will be applied within 30 days of release, with testing scheduled to meet this requirement.
      • Normal-priority patches will be evaluated for appropriateness and will be installed as needed.

    Document your patch management policy

    Supporting Tool icon 3.1.3 Use the Patch Management Policy template to document your policy

    The patch management policy helps to ensure company computers are properly patched with the latest appropriate updates to reduce system vulnerability and to enhance repair application functionality. The policy aids in establishing procedures for the identification of vulnerabilities and potential areas of functionality enhancements, as well as the safe and timely installation of patches. The patch management policy is key to identifying and mitigating any system vulnerabilities and establishing standard patch management practices.

    Use Info-Tech’s Patch Management Policy template to get started.

    Sample of the 'Patch Management Policy' template.

    Step 3.2 Harvest, Redeploy, or Retire Software

    Phase 3:
    Manage, Redeploy & Retire
    This step will walk you through the following activities:This step involves the following participants:

    3.1

    Manage & Maintain Software
    • 3.2.1 Map your software license harvest and reallocation process
    • 3.2.2 Define the policy for retiring software
    • IT Director, CIO
    • IT Managers and SAM Manager
    • SAM Team

    3.2

    Harvest, Redeploy, or Retire

    Step Outcomes

    • A defined process for harvesting and reallocating unused software licenses
    • A defined policy for how and when to retire unused or outdated software

    Harvest and reallocate software to optimize license usage

    Using a defined process for harvesting licenses will yield a crop of savings throughout the organization.

    Unused software licenses are present in nearly every organization and result in wasted resources and software spend. Recycling and reharvesting licenses is a critical process within software asset management to save your organization money.

    Licensing Recycling

    When computers are no longer in use and retired, the software licenses installed on the machines may be able to be reused.

    License recycling involves reusing these licenses on machines that are still in use or for new employees.

    License Harvesting

    License harvesting involves more actively identifying machines with licenses that are either not in use or under utilized, and recovering them to be used elsewhere, thus reducing overall software spend on new licenses.

    Use software monitoring data to identify licenses for reallocation in alignment with policies and agreements

    1. Monitor software usage
      Monitor and track software license usage to gain a clear picture of where and how existing software licenses are being used and identify any unused or underused licenses.
    2. Identify licenses for reharvesting
      Identify software licenses that can be reharvested and reallocated according to your policy.
    3. Uninstall software
      Notify user, schedule a removal time if approved, uninstall software, and confirm it has been removed.
    4. Reallocate license when needed

    Sources of surplus licenses for harvest:

    • Projects that required a license during a particular time period, but now do not require a license (i.e. the free version of the software will suffice)
    • Licenses assigned to users no longer with the organization
    • Software installed on decommissioned hardware
    • Installed software that hasn’t been used by the user in the last 90 days (or other defined period)
    • Over-purchased software due to poorly controlled software request, approval, or provisioning processes

    Info-Tech Insight

    Know the stipulations of your end-user license agreement (EULA) before harvesting and reallocating licenses. There may be restrictions on how often a license can be recycled in your agreement.

    Create a defined process for software license harvesting

    Define a standard reharvest timeline. For example, every 90 days, your SAM team can perform an internal audit using your SAM tool to gather data on software usage. If a user has not used a title in that time period, your team can remove that title from that user’s machine. Depending on the terms and conditions of the contract, the license can either be retired or harvested and reallocated.

    Ensure you have exception rules built in for software that’s cyclical in its usage. For example, Finance may only use tax software during tax season, so there’s no reason to lump it under the same process as other titles.

    It’s important to note that in addition to this process, you will need a software usage policy that supports your license harvest process.

    The value of license harvesting

    • Let’s say you paid for 1,000 licenses of a software title at a price of $200 per license.
    • Of this total, 950 have been deployed, and of that total, 800 are currently being used.
    • This means that 16% of deployed licenses are not in use – at a cost of $30,000.
    • With a defined license harvest process, this situation would have been prevented.

    Build a workflow to document the software harvest process

    Include the following in your process:

    • How will unused software be identified?
    • How often will usage reports be reviewed?
    • How will the user be notified of software to be removed?
    • How will the software be removed?
    A flowchart documenting the software harvest process. There are two levels, at the top is 'IT Asset Manager', and the bottom is 'Desktop Support Team'. It begins in 'IT Asset Manager' with 'Create/Review Usage Report', and if the client agrees to removal it moves to 'License deactivation required?' in 'Desktop Support Team'. Eventually you 'Close ticket' and it moves back up to 'Discovery tool will register change automatically' in 'IT Asset Manager'.

    Map your software license harvest and reallocation process

    Associated Activity icon 3.2.1 Build license harvest and reallocation workflow

    Participants: IT Director, Asset Manager, Service Desk Manager

    Document: Document in the Standard Operating Procedures.

    1. Outline each step in the process of software harvest and reallocation using notecards or a whiteboard. Be as granular as possible. On each card, describe the step and the individual responsible for each step.
    2. When you are satisfied that each step is accurately captured, use a second color of notecard to document any challenges, inefficiencies, or pains associated with each step. Consider further documenting the time on each task.
    3. Examine each challenge or pain point. Discuss whether there is a clear solution to the problem. If so, document the solution and amend the workflow. If not, engage in a broader discussion of possible solutions, considering people, processes, and available technology.
    4. Use the sample workflow on the previous slide as a guide if needed.

    The same flowchart documenting the software harvest process from the previous section.

    Improve your software retirement process to drive savings for the whole business

    Business Drivers for Software Disposal

    • Cost Reduction
      • Application retirement allows the application and the supporting hardware stack to be decommissioned.
      • This eliminates recurring costs such as licensing, maintenance, and application administration costs, representing potentially significant savings
    • Consolidation
      • Many legacy applications are redundant systems. For example, many companies have ten or more legacy financial systems from mergers/acquisitions.
      • Systems can be siloed, running incompatible software. Moving data to a common accessible repository streamlines research, audits, and reporting.
    • Compliance
      • An increased focus on regulations places renewed emphasis on e-discovery policies. Keeping legacy applications active just to retain data is an expensive proposition.
      • During application retirement, data is classified, assigned retention policies, and disposed of according to data/governance initiatives.
    • Risk Mitigation
      • Relying on IT to manage legacy systems is problematic. The lack of IT staff familiar with the application increases the potential risk of delayed responses to audits and e-discovery.
      • Retiring application data to a common platform lets you leverage skills you have current investments in. This enables you to be responsive to audit or litigation results.

    Retire your outdated software to decrease IT spend on redundant applications

    Benefits of software retirement:

    1. Assists the service desk in not having to support every release, version, or edition of software that your company might have used in the past.
    2. Stay current with product releases so your company is better placed to take advantage of improvements built-in to such products, rather than being limited by the lack of a newly introduced function.
    3. Removing software that is no longer of commercial benefit can offer a residual value through assets.

    Consequences of continuing to support outdated software:

    • Budgets are tied up to support existing applications and infrastructure, which leaves little room to invest in new technologies that would otherwise help grow business.
    • Much of this software includes legacy systems that were acquired or replaced when new applications were deployed. The value of these outdated systems decreases with every passing year, yet organizations often continue to support these applications.
      • Fear of compliance and data access are the most common reasons.
    • Unfortunately, the cost of doing so can consume over 50% of an overall IT budget.

    The solution to this situation is to retire outdated software.

    “Time and time again, I keep hearing stories from schools on how IT budgets are constantly being squeezed, but when I dig a little deeper, little or no effort is being made on accounting for software that might be on the kit we are taking away.” (Phil Goldsmith, Managing Director – ScrumpyMacs)

    Define the policy for retiring software

    Associated Activity icon 3.2.2 Document process for software retirement

    Participants: IT Director, Asset Manager, Operations

    Document: Document in the Standard Operating Procedures.

    1. Discuss and document the process for retiring software that has been deemed redundant due to changing business needs or an improvement in competitive options.
    2. Consider the following:
      • What criteria will determine when software is suited for retirement?
      • The contract should always be reviewed before making a decision to ensure proper notice is given to the vendor.
      • Notice should be provided as soon as possible to ensure no additional billing arrives for renewals.
      • How will software be removed from all devices? How soon must the software be replaced, if applicable?
      • How long will records be archived in the ITAM database?
    3. Document decisions in the Standard Operating Procedures.

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech Workshop Associated Activity icon

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    Photo of an Info-Tech analyst.
    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analyst will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech's historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    3.1.2

    Sample of activity 3.1.2 'Define policies for software maintenance and patches'. Define policies for software maintenance and patches

    Discuss best practices and define policies for conducting regular software maintenance and patching.

    3.2.1

    Sample of activity 3.3.1 'Assess the maturity of audit management processes and policies'. Map your software license harvest and reallocation process

    Build a process workflow for harvesting and reallocating unused software licenses.

    Phase 3 outline

    Associated Activity icon Call 1-888-670-8889 or email GuidedImplementations@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Complete these steps on your own, or call us to complete a guided implementation. A guided implementation is a series of 2-3 advisory calls that help you execute each phase of a project. They are included in most advisory memberships.

    Guided Implementation 3: Manage, redeploy, and retire

    Proposed Time to Completion (in weeks): 4
    Step 3.1: Manage and maintain softwareStep 3.2: Harvest, redeploy, or retire
    Start with an analyst kick-off call:
    • Define a process for conducting software inventory
    • Define a policy for software maintenance
    • Build a patch management policy
    Review findings with analyst:
    • Build a process for harvesting and reallocating software licenses
    • Define a software retirement policy
    Then complete these activities…
    • Define process for conducting software inventory
    • Define policies for software maintenance
    • Document patch management policy
    Then complete these activities…
    • Map software harvest and reallocation process
    • Define software retirement policy
    With these tools & templates:
    • Standard Operating Procedures
    • Patch Management Policy
    With these tools & templates:
    • Standard Operating Procedures

    Phase 4: Build Supporting Processes & Tools

    Visa used an internal SAM strategy to win the audit battle

    Logo for VISA.

    Case Study

    Industry: Financial Services
    Source: SAM Summit 2014

    Challenge

    The overarching goal of any SAM program is compliance to prevent costly audit fines. The SAM team at Visa was made up of many individuals who were former auditors.

    To deal with audit requests from vendors, “understand how auditors do things and understand their approach,” states Joe Birdsong, SAM Director at Visa.

    Vendors are always on the lookout for telltale signs of a lucrative audit. For Visa, the key was to understand these processes and learn how to prepare for them.

    Solution

    Vendors typically look for the following when evaluating an organization for audit:

    1. A recent decrease in customer spend
    2. How easy the licensed software is to audit
    3. Organizational health

    Ultimately, an audit is an attack on the relationship between the vendor and organization. According to Birdsong: “Maybe they haven’t really touched base with your teams and had good contact and relationship with them, and they don’t really know what’s going on in your enterprise.”

    Results

    By understanding the motivations behind potential audits, Visa was able to form a strategy to increase transparency with the vendor.

    Regular data collection, almost real-time reporting, and open, quick communication with the vendor surrounding audits made Visa a low-risk client for vendors.

    Buy-in from management is also important, and the creation of an official SAM strategy helps maintain support. Thanks to its proactive SAM program, Visa saved $200 million in just three years.

    Step 4.1 Ensure compliance for audits

    Phase 4:
    Build supporting processes & tools
    This step will walk you through the following activities:This step involves the following participants:

    4.1

    Compliance & audits
    • 4.1.1 Define and document the internal audit process
    • 4.1.2 Define and document the external audit process
    • 4.1.3 Prepare an audit scoping email template
    • 4.1.4 Prepare an audit launch email template
    • IT Director, CIO
    • IT Managers and SAM Manager
    • SAM Team

    4.2

    Communicate & build roadmap

    Step Outcomes

    • An understanding of the audit process and importance of audit preparation
    • A defined process for conducting regular internal audits to prepare for and defend against external audits
    • A strategy and documented process for responding to external audit requests

    Take a lifecycle approach to your software compliance process

    Internal audits are an effective way for organizations to regularly assess their licensing position in preparation for an audit.

    1. Gather License Data
      Use your SAM tool to run a discovery check to determine the current state of your software estate.
    2. Improve Data Quality
      Scan the data for red flags. Improve its completeness, consistency, and quality.
    3. Identify Audit Risks
      Using corrected license data, examine your reports and identify areas of risk within the organization.
    4. Identify priority titles
      Determine which titles need attention first by using the output of the license rationalization step.
    5. Reconcile to eliminate gaps
      Ensure that the correct number of licenses are deployed for each title.
    6. Draft Vendor Response
      Prepare response to vendor for when an audit has been requested.

    Improve audit response maturity by leveraging technology and contract data

    By improving your software asset management program’s maturity, you will drive savings for the business that go beyond the negotiating table.

    Recognize the classic signs of each stage of audit response maturity to identify where your organization currently stands and where it can go.

    • Optimized: Automated tools generate compliance, usage, and savings reports. Product usage reports and alerts in place to harvest and reuse licenses. Detailed savings reports provided to executive team.
    • Proactive: Best practices enforced. Compliance positions are checked quarterly, and compliance reports are used to negotiate software contracts.
    • Reactive: Best practices identified but unused. Manual tools still primarily in use. Compliance reports are time-consuming and often inaccurate.
    • Chaotic: Purchases are ad hoc and transaction based. Minimal tracking in place, leading to time-consuming manual processes.

    Implement a proactive internal audit strategy to defend against external audits

    Audits – particularly those related to software – have been on the rise as vendors attempt to recapture revenue.

    Being prepared for an audit is critical. Internal preparation will not only help your organization reduce the risk associated with an audit but will also improve daily operations through focusing on diligent documentation and data collection.

    Conducting routine internal audits will help prepare your organization for the real deal and may even prevent the audit from happening altogether. Hundreds of thousands of dollars can be saved through a proactive audit strategy with routine documentation in place.

    In addition to the fines incurred from a failed audit, numerous other negative consequences can arise:

    • Multiple audits: Failing an audit makes the organization more likely to be audited again.
    • Poor perception of IT: Unless non-compliance was previously disclosed to the business, IT can be deemed responsible.
    • Punitive injunctions: If a settlement is not reached, vendors will apply for an injunction, inhibiting use of their software.
    • Inability to justify purchases: IT can have difficulty justifying the purchase of additional resources after a failed audit.
    • Disruption to business: Precious time and resources will be spent dealing with the results of the audit.

    Perform routine internal compliance reports to decrease audit risk

    The intent of an internal audit is to stop the battle from happening before it starts. Waiting for a knock at the door from a vendor can be stressful, and it can do harm beyond a costly fine.

    • Internal audits help to ensure you’re keeping track of any software changes to keep your data and licensing up to date and avoid costly surprises if an external audit is requested.
    • Identify areas where processes are breaking down and address them before there’s a potential negative impact.
    • Identify control points in processes ahead of time to more easily identify access points where information should be verified.

    “You want to get [the] environment to a level where you’re comfortable sharing information with [a] vendor. Inviting them in to have a chat and exposing numbers means there’s no relationship there where they’re coming to audit you. They only come to audit you when they know there’s a gain to be had, otherwise what’s the point of auditing?
    I want customers to get comfortable with licensing and what they’re spending, and then there’s no problem exposing that to vendors. Vendors actually appreciate that.”
    (Ben Brand, SAM Practice Manager, Insight)

    Info-Tech Insight

    “The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting.” – Sun Tzu

    Performing routine checks on your license compliance will drastically reduce the risk that your organization gets hit with a costly fine. Maintaining transparency and demonstrating compliance will fend off audit-hungry vendors.

    Define and document the internal audit process

    Associated Activity icon 4.1.1 Document process and procedures for internal audits

    Participants: CIO and/or IT Director, Asset Manager, IT Managers

    Document: Document in the Standard Operating Procedures.

    Define and document a process for conducting internal software audits.
    Include the following:

    1. How often will audits be completed for each software published?
    2. When will audits be conducted?
    3. Who will conduct the audit? Who will be consulted?
    4. What will be included in the scope of the audit?

    Example:

    • Annual audits will be completed for each software publisher, scheduled as part of the license or maintenance agreement renewals.
    • Where annual purchases are not required, vendor audits for compliance will be conducted annually, with a date predetermined based on minimizing scheduling conflicts with larger audits.
    • Audit will be completed with input from product managers.
    • Audit will include:
      • Software compliance review: Licenses owned compared to product installed.
      • Version review: Determine if installed versions match company standards. If there is a need for upgrades, does the license permit upgrading?
      • Maintenance review: Does the maintenance match requirements for the next year’s plans and licenses in use?
      • Support review: Is the support contract appropriate for use?
      • Budget: Has budget been allocated; is there an adjustment required due to increases?

    Identify organizational warning signs to decrease audit risk

    Being prepared for an audit is critical. Internal preparation will not only help your organization reduce the risk associated with an audit but will also improve daily operations through focusing on diligent documentation and data collection.

    Certain triggers exist that indicate a higher risk of an audit occurring. It is important to recognize these warning signs so you can prepare accordingly.

    Health of organization
    If your organization is putting out fires and a vendor can sense it, they’ll see an audit as a highly lucrative exercise.

    Decrease in customer spend
    A decrease in spend means that an organization has a high chance of being under-licensed.

    License complexity
    The more complex the license, the harder it is to remain in compliance. Some vendors are infamous for their complex licensing agreements.

    Audit Strategy

    • Audits should neither be feared nor embraced.
    • An audit is an attack on your relationship with your vendor; your vendor needs to defend its best interests, but it would also rather maintain a satisfied relationship with its client.
    • A proactive approach to audits through routine reporting and transparency with vendors will alleviate all fear surrounding the audit process. It provides your vendor with compliance assurance and communicates that an audit won’t net the vendor enough revenue to justify the effort.

    Focus on three key tactics for success before responding to an audit

    Taking these due diligence steps will pay dividends downstream, reducing the risk of negative results such as release of confidential information.

    Form an Audit Team

    • Once an audit letter is received from a vendor or third party, a virtual team needs to be formed.
    • The team should be cross-functional, representing various core areas of the business.
    • Don’t forget legal counsel: they will assist in the review of audit provision(s) to determine your contractual rights and obligations with respect to the audit.

    Sign an NDA

    • An NDA should be signed by all parties, the organization, the vendor, and the auditor.
    • Don’t wait on a vendor to provide its NDA. The organization should have its own and provide it to both parties.
    • If the auditor is a third party, negotiate a three-way NDA. This will prevent data being shared with other third parties.

    Examine Contract History

    • Vendors will attempt to alter terms of contracts when new products are purchased.
    • Maintain your current agreement if they are more favorable by “grandfathering” your original agreement.
    • Oracle master level agreements are an example: master level agreements offer more favorable terms than more recent versions.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Even if you cannot get a third-party NDA signed, the negotiation process should delay the overall audit process by at least a month, buying your organization valuable time to gather license data.

    Be prepared for external audit requests with a defined process for responding

    1. Vendor-initiated audit request received and brought to attention of IT Asset Manager and CIO.
    2. Acknowledge receipt of audit notice.
    3. Negotiate timing and scope of the audit (including software titles, geographic locations, entities, and completion date).
    4. Notify staff not to remove or acquire licenses for software under audit.
    5. Gather documentation and create report of all licensed software within audit scope.
      • Include original contract, most recent contract, and any addendums, purchase receipts, or reseller invoices, and publisher documentation such as manuals or electronic media.
    6. Compare documentation to installed software according to ITAM database.
    7. Validate any unusual or non-compliant software.
    8. Complete documentation requested by auditor and review results.

    Define and document the external audit process

    Associated Activity icon 4.1.2 Define external audit process

    Participants: CIO and/or IT Director, Asset Manager, IT Managers

    Document: Document in the Standard Operating Procedures.

    Define and document a process for responding to external software audit requests.
    Include the following:

    1. Who must be notified of the audit request when it is received?
    2. When must acknowledgement of the notice be sent and by whom?
    3. What must be defined under the scope of the audit (e.g. software titles, geographic locations, entities, completion date)?
    4. What communications must be sent to IT staff and end users to ensure compliance?
    5. What documentation should be gathered to review?
    6. How will documentation be verified against data?
    7. How will unusual or non-compliant software be identified and validated?
    8. Who needs to be informed of the results?

    Control audit scope with an audit response template

    Supporting Tool icon 4.1.3 Prepare an audit scoping email template

    Use the Software Audit Scoping Email Template to create an email directed at your external (or internal) auditors. Send the audit scoping email several weeks before an audit to determine the audit’s scope and objectives. The email should include:

    • Detailed questions about audit scope and objectives.
    • Critical background information on your organization/program.

    The email will help focus your preparation efforts and initiate your relationship with the auditors.

    Control scope by addressing the following:

    • Products covered by a properly executed agreement
    • Geographic regions
    • User groups
    • Time periods
    • Specific locations
    • A subset of users’ computers
    Sample of the 'Software Audit Scoping Email Template'.

    Keep leadership informed with an audit launch email

    Supporting Tool icon 4.1.4 Prepare an audit launch email template

    Approximately a week before the audit, you should email the internal leadership to communicate information about the start of the audit. Use the Software Audit Launch Email Template to create this email, including:

    • Staffing
    • Functional requirements
    • Audit contact person information
    • Scheduling details
    • Audit report estimated delivery time

    For more guidance on preparing for a software audit, see Info-Tech’s blueprint: Prepare and Defend Against a Software Audit.

    Sample of the 'Software Audit Launch Email Template'.

    A large bank employed proactive, internal audits to experience big savings

    Case Study

    Industry: Banking
    Source: Pomeroy

    Challenge

    A large American financial institution with 1,300 banking centers in 12 states, 28,000 end users, and 108,000 assets needed to improve its asset management program.

    The bank had employed numerous ITAM tools, but IT staff identified that its asset data was still fragmented. There was still incomplete insight into what assets the banked owned, the precise value of those assets, their location, and what they’re being used for.

    The bank decided to establish an asset management program that involved internal audits to gather more-complete data sets.

    Solution

    With the help of a vendor, the bank implemented cradle-to-grave asset tracking and lifecycle management, which provided discovery of almost $80 million in assets.

    The bank also assembled an ITAM team and a dedicated ITAM manager to ensure that routine internal audits were performed.

    The team was instrumental in establishing standardization of IT policies, hardware configuration, and service requirements.

    Results

    • The bank identified and now tracks over 108,000 assets.
    • The previous level of 80% accuracy in inventory tracking was raised to 96%.
    • Nearly $500,000 was saved through asset recovery and repurposing of 600 idle assets.
    • There are hundreds of thousands of dollars in estimated savings as the result of avoiding costly penalties from failed audits thanks to proactive internal audits.

    Step 4.2 Build communication plan and roadmap

    Phase 4:
    Build supporting processes & tools
    This step will walk you through the following activities:This step involves the following participants:

    4.1

    Compliance & audits
    • 4.2.1 Develop a communication plan to convey the right messages
    • 4.2.2 Anticipate end-user questions by preparing an FAQ list
    • 4.2.3 Build a software asset management policy
    • 4.2.4 Build additional SAM policies
    • 4.2.5 Develop a SAM roadmap to plan your implementation
    • IT Director, CIO
    • IT Managers and SAM Manager
    • SAM Team

    4.2

    Communicate & build roadmap

    Step Outcomes

    • A documented communications plan for relevant stakeholders to understand the benefits and changes the SAM program will bring
    • A list of anticipated end-user questions with responses
    • Documented software asset management policies
    • An implementation roadmap

    Communicate SAM processes to gain acceptance and support

    Communication is crucial to the integration and overall implementation of your SAM program. If staff and users do not understand the purpose of processes and policies, they will fail to provide the desired value.

    An effective communication plan will:

    • Gain support from management at the project proposal phase.
    • Create end-user buy-in once the program is set to launch.
    • Maintain the presence of the program throughout the business.
    • Instill ownership throughout the business from top-level management to new hires.

    Communicate the following:

    1. Advertise successes

      • Regularly demonstrate the value of the SAM program with descriptive statistics focused on key financial benefits.
      • Share data with the appropriate personnel; promote success to obtain further support from senior management.
    2. Report and share asset data

      • Sharing detailed asset-related reports frequently gives decision makers useful data to aid in their strategy.
      • These reports can help your organization prepare for audits, adjust budgeting, and detect unauthorized software.
    3. Communicate the value of SAM

      • Educate management and end users about how they fit into the bigger picture.
      • Individuals need to know which behaviors may put the organization at risk or adversely affect data quality.

    Educate staff and end users through SAM training to increase program success

    As part of your communication plan and overall SAM implementation, training should be provided to both staff and end users within the organization.

    • ITAM solutions are complex by nature with both business process and technical knowledge required to use them correctly.
    • All facets of the business, from management to new hires, should be provided with training to help them understand their role in the program’s success.
    • Keep the message appropriate to the audience – end users don’t need to know the complete process, but will need to know policy and how to request.
    • Even after the SAM program has been fully implemented, keep employees up to date with policies and processes through ongoing training sessions for both new hires and existing employees:
      • New hires: Provide new hires with all relevant SAM policies and ensure they understand the importance of software asset management.
      • Existing employees: Continually remind them of how SAM is involved in their daily operations and inform them of any changes to policies.

    Create your communications plan to anticipate challenges, remove obstacles, and ensure buy-in

    Provide separate communications to key stakeholder groups

    Why:
    • What problems are you trying to solve?
    What:
    • What processes will it affect (that will affect me)?
    Who:
    • Who will be affected?
    • Who do I go to if I have issues with the new process?
    Three circular arrows each linking t the next in a downward daisy chain. The type arrow has 'IT Staff' in the middle, the second 'Management', and the third 'End Users' When:
    • When will this be happening?
    • When will it affect me?
    How:
    • How will these changes manifest themselves?
    Goal:
    • What is the final goal?
    • How will it benefit me?

    Develop a communication plan to convey the right messages

    Associated Activity icon 4.2.1 Develop a communication plan to convey the right messages

    Participants: CIO, IT Director, Asset Manager, Service Desk Manager

    Document: Document in the SAM Communication Plan.

    1. Identify the groups that will be affected by the SAM program.
    2. For each group requiring a communication plan, identify the following:
    3. Benefits of SAM for that group of individuals (e.g. more efficient software requests).
    4. The impact the change will have on them (e.g. change in the way a certain process will work).
    5. Communication method (i.e. how you will communicate).
    6. Timeframe (i.e. when and how often you will communicate the changes).
    7. Complete this information in a table like the one below and document in the Communication Plan.
    Group Benefits Impact Method Timeline
    Executives
    • Improved audit compliance
    • Improved budgeting and forecasting
    • Review and sign off on policies
    End Users
    • Streamlined software request process
    • Follow software installation and security policies
    IT
    • Faster access to data and one source of truth
    • Modified processes
    • Ensure audits are completed regularly

    Anticipate end-user questions by preparing an FAQ list

    Associated Activity icon 4.2.2 Prepare an FAQ list

    Document: Document FAQ questions and answers in the SAM FAQ Template.

    ITAM imposes changes to end users throughout the business and it’s normal to expect questions about the new program. Prepare your team ahead of time by creating a list of FAQs.

    Some common questions include:

    • Why are you changing from the old processes?
    • Why now?
    • What are you going to ask me to do differently?
    • Will I lose any of my software?

    The benefits of preparing a list of answers to FAQs include:

    • A reduction in time spent creating answers to questions. If you focus on the most common questions, you will make efficient use of your team’s time.
    • Consistency in your team’s responses. By socializing the answers to FAQs, you ensure that no one on your team is out of the loop and the message remains consistent across the board.

    Include policy design and enforcement in your communication plan

    • Software asset management policies should define the actions to be taken to support software asset management processes and ensure the effective and efficient management of IT software assets across the asset lifecycle.
    • Implementing asset management policies enforces the notion that the organization takes its IT assets and the management of them seriously and will help ensure the benefits of SAM are achieved.
    • Designing, approving, documenting, and adopting one set of standard SAM policies for each department to follow will ensure the processes are enforced equally across the organization.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Use policy templates to jumpstart your policy development and ensure policies are comprehensive, but be sure to modify and adapt policies to suit your corporate culture or they will not gain buy-in from employees. For a policy to be successful, it must be a living document and have participation and involvement from the committees and departments to whom it will pertain.

    Build a software asset management policy

    Supporting Tool icon 4.2.3 Document a SAM policy

    Use Info-Tech’s Software Asset Management Policy template to define and document the purpose, scope, objectives, and roles and responsibilities for your organization's software asset management program.

    The template allows you to customize policy requirements for:

    • Procurement
    • Installation and Removal
    • Maintenance
    • Mergers and Acquisitions
    • Company Divestitures
    • Audits

    …as well as consequences for non-compliance.

    Sample of the 'Software Asset Management Policy' template.

    Use Info-Tech’s policy templates to build additional policies

    Supporting Tool icon 4.2.4 Build additional SAM policies

    Asset Security Policy
    The IT asset security policy will describe your organization's approach to ensuring the physical and digital security of your IT assets throughout their entire lifecycle.

    End-User Devices Acceptable Use Policy
    This policy should describe how business tools provided to employees are to be used in a responsible, ethical, and compliant manner, as well as the consequences of non-compliance.

    Purchasing Policy
    The purchasing policy helps to establish company standards, guidelines, and procedures for the purchase of all information technology hardware, software, and computer-related components as well as the purchase of all technical services.

    Release Management Policy
    Use this policy template to define and document the purpose, scope, objectives, and roles and responsibilities for your organization's release management program.

    Internet Acceptable Use Policy
    Use this template to help keep the internet use policy up to date. This policy template includes descriptions of acceptable and unacceptable use, security provisions, and disclaimers on the right of the organization to monitor usage and liability.

    Samples of additional SAM policies, listed to the left.

    Implement SAM in a phased, constructive approach

    One of the most difficult decisions to make when implementing a SAM program is: “where do we start?”

    It’s not necessary to deploy a comprehensive SAM program to start. Build on the essentials to become more mature as you grow.

    SAM Program Maturity (highest to lowest)

    • Audits and reporting
      Gather and analyze data about software assets to ensure compliance for audits and to continually improve the business.
    • Contracts and budget
      Analyze contracts and licenses for software across the enterprise and optimize planning to enable cost reduction.
    • Lifecycle standardization
      Define standards and processes for all asset lifecycle phases from request and procurement through to retirement and redistribution.
    • Inventory and tracking
      Define assets you will procure, distribute, and track. Know what you have, where it is deployed, and keep track of contracts and all relevant data.

    Integrate your SAM program with the organization to assist its implementation

    SAM cannot perform on its own – it must be integrated with other functional areas of the organization to maintain its stability and support.

    • Effective SAM is supported by a comprehensive set of processes as part of its implementation.
    • For example, integration with the procurement team’s processes and tools is required to track software purchases to mitigate software license compliance risk.
    • Integration with Finance is required to support internal cost allocations and chargebacks.
    • Integration with the service desk is required to track and deploy software requests.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    To integrate SAM effectively, a clear implementation roadmap needs to be designed. Prioritize “quick wins” to demonstrate success to the business early and to gain buy-in from your team. Short-term gains should be designed to support long-term goals of your SAM program.

    Sample short-term goals
    • Identify inventory classification and tool
    • Create basic SAM policies and processes
    • Implement SAM auto-discovery tools
    Sample long-term goals
    • Software contract data integration
    • Continual improvement through review and revision
    • Software compliance reports, internal audits

    Develop a SAM roadmap to plan your implementation

    Associated Activity icon 4.2.5 Build a project roadmap
    1. Identify and review all initiatives that will be taken to implement or improve the software asset management program. These may fall under people, process, or technology-related tasks.
    2. Assign a priority level to each task (Quick Win, Low, Medium, High).
    3. Use the priority to sort tasks into start dates, breaking down by:
      1. Short, medium, or long-term
      2. 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12+ months
      3. Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4
    4. Review tasks and adjust start dates for some, if needed to set realistic and achievable timelines.
    5. Transfer tasks to a project plan or Gantt chart to formalize.
    Examples:
    Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
    • Hire software asset manager
    • Document SOP
    • Define policies
    • Select a SAM tool
    • Create list of approved services and software
    • Define metrics
    • Inventory existing software and contracts
    • Build a patch policy
    • Build a service catalog
    • Contract renewal alignment
    • Run internal audit
    • Security review

    Review and maintain the SAM program to reach optimal maturity

    • SAM is a dynamic process. It must adapt to keep pace with the direction of the organization. New applications, different licensing needs, and a constant stream of new end users all contribute to complicating the licensing process.
    • As part of your organization’s journey to an optimized SAM program, put in place continual improvement practices to maintain momentum.

    A suggested cycle of review and maintenance for your SAM: 'Plan', 'Do', 'Check', 'Act'.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Advertising the increased revenue that is gained from good SAM practices is a powerful way to gain project buy-in.

    Keep the momentum going:

    • Clearly define ongoing responsibilities for each role.
    • Develop a training and awareness program for new employees to be introduced to SAM processes and policies.
    • Continually review and revise existing processes as necessary.
    • Measure the success of the program to identify areas for improvement and demonstrate successes.
    • Measure adherence to process and policies and enforce as needed.

    Reflect on the outcomes of implementing SAM to target areas for improvement and share knowledge gained within and beyond the SAM team. Some questions to consider include:

    1. How did the data compare to our expectations? Was the project a success?
    2. What obstacles were present that impacted the project?
    3. How can we apply lessons learned through this project to others in the future?

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech Workshop Associated Activity icon

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    Photo of an Info-Tech analyst.
    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analyst will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech's historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    4.2.1

    Sample of activity 4.2.1 'Develop a communication plan to convey the right messages'. Develop a communication plan to convey the right messages

    Identify stakeholders requiring communication and formulate a message and delivery method for each.

    4.2.5

    Sample of activity 4.2.5 'Develop a SAM roadmap to plan your implementation'. Develop a SAM roadmap to plan your implementation

    Outline the tasks necessary for the implementation of this project and prioritize to build a project roadmap.

    Phase 4 outline

    Associated Activity icon Call 1-888-670-8889 or email GuidedImplementations@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Complete these steps on your own, or call us to complete a guided implementation. A guided implementation is a series of 2-3 advisory calls that help you execute each phase of a project. They are included in most advisory memberships.

    Guided Implementation 4: Build supporting processes & tools

    Proposed Time to Completion (in weeks): 4
    Step 4.1: Compliance & audits Step 4.2: Communicate & build roadmap
    Start with an analyst kick-off call:
    • Discuss audit process
    • Define a process for internal audits
    • Define a process for external audit response
    Review findings with analyst:
    • Build communication plan
    • Discuss policy needs
    • Build a roadmap
    Then complete these activities…
    • Document internal audit process
    • Document external audit process
    • Prepare audit templates
    Then complete these activities…
    • Develop communication plan
    • Prepare an FAQ list for end users
    • Build SAM policies
    • Develop a roadmap
    With these tools & templates:
    • Standard Operating Procedures
    • Software Audit Scoping Email Template
    • Software Audit Launch Email Template
    With these tools & templates:
    • SAM Communication Plan
    • Software Asset Management FAQ Template
    • Software Asset Management Policy
    • Additional Policy Templates

    Bibliography

    2013 Software Audit Industry Report.” Express Metrix, 2013. Web.

    7 Vital Trends Disrupting Today’s Workplace: Results and Data from 2013 TINYpulse Employee Engagement Survey.” TINYpulse, 2013. Web.

    Beaupoil, Christof. “How to measure data quality and protect against software audits.” Network World, 6 June 2011.

    Begg, Daniel. “Effective Licence Position (ELP) – What is it really worth?” LinkedIn, 19 January 2016.

    Boehler, Bernhard. “Advanced License Optimization: Go Beyond Compliance for Maximum Cost Savings.” The ITAM Review, 24 November 2014.

    Bruce, Warren. “SAM Baseline – process & best practice.” Microsoft. 2013 Australia Partner Conference.

    Case Study Top 20 U.S. Bank Tackles Asset Management.” Pomeroy, 2012. Web.

    Cherwell Software Software Audit Industry Report.” Cherwell Software, 2015. Web.

    Conrad, Sandi. “SAM starter kit: everything you need to get started with software asset management. Conrad & Associates, 2010.

    Corstens, Jan, and Diederik Van der Sijpe. “Contract risk & compliance software asset management (SAM).” Deloitte, 2012.

    Deas, A., T. Markowitzm and E. Black. “Software asset management: high risk, high reward.” Deloitte, 2014.

    Doig, Chris. “Why you should always estimate ROI before buying enterprise software” CIO, 13 August 2015.

    Fried, Chuck. “America Needs An Education On Software Asset Management (SAM).” LinkedIn. 16 June 2015.

    Lyons, Gwen. “Understanding the Drivers Behind Application Rationalization Critical to Success.” Flexera Software Blog, 31 October 2012.

    Bibliography

    Metrics to Measure SAM Success: eight ways to prove your SAM program is delivering business benefits.” Snow Software White Paper, 2015.

    Microsoft. “The SAM Optimization Model.” Microsoft Corporation White Paper, 2010.

    Miller, D. and M. Oliver. “Engaging Stakeholders for Project Success.” Project Management Institute White Paper, 2015.

    Morrison, Dan. “5 Common Misconceptions of Software Asset Management.” SoftwareOne. 12 May 2015.

    O’Neill, Leslie T. “Visa Case Study: SAM in the 21st Century.” International Business Software Managers Association (IBSMA), 30 July 2014.

    Reducing Hidden Operating Costs Through IT Asset Discovery.” NetSupport Inc., 2011.

    SAM Summit 2014, 23-25 June 2014, University of Chicago Gleacher Center Conference Facilities, Chicago, MI.

    Saxby, Heather. “20 Things Every CIO Needs to Know about Software Asset Management.” Crayon Software Experts, 13 May 2015.

    The 2016 State of IT: Managing the money monsters for the coming year.” Spiceworks, 2016.

    The Hidden Cost of Unused Software.” A 1E Report, 1E.com: 2014. Web.

    What does it take to achieve software license optimization?” Flexera White Paper, 2013.

    Research contributors and experts

    Photo of Michael Dean, Director, User Support Services, Des Moines University Michael Dean
    Director, User Support Services
    Des Moines University
    Simon Leuty
    Co-Founder
    Livingstone Tech
    Photo of Simon Leuty, Co-Founder, Livingstone Tech
    Photo of Clare Walsh, PR Consultant, Adesso Tech Ltd. Clare Walsh
    PR Consultant
    Adesso Tech Ltd.
    Alex Monaghan
    Director, Presales EMEA
    Product Support Solutions
    Photo of Alex Monaghan, Director, Presales EMEA, Product Support Solutions

    Research contributors and experts

    Photo of Ben Brand, SAM Practice Manager, Insight Ben Brand
    SAM Practice Manager
    Insight
    Michael Swanson
    President
    ISAM
    Photo of Michael Swanson, President, ISAM
    Photo of Bruce Aboudara, SVP, Marketing & Business Development, Scalable Software Bruce Aboudara
    SVP, Marketing & Business Development
    Scalable Software
    Will Degener
    Senior Solutions Consultant
    Scalable Software
    Photo of Will Degener, Senior Solutions Consultant, Scalable Software

    Research contributors and experts

    Photo of Peter Gregorowicz, Associate Director, Network & Client Services, Vancouver Community College Peter Gregorowicz
    Associate Director, Network & Client Services
    Vancouver Community College
    Peter Schnitzler
    Operations Team Lead
    Toyota Canada
    Photo of Peter Schnitzler, Operations Team Lead, Toyota Canada
    Photo of David Maughan, Head of Service Transition, Mott MacDonald Ltd. David Maughan
    Head of Service Transition
    Mott MacDonald Ltd.
    Brian Bernard
    Infrastructure & Operations Manager
    Lee County Clerk of Court
    Photo of Brian Bernard, Infrastructure & Operations Manager, Lee County Clerk of Court

    Research contributors and experts

    Photo of Leticia Sobrado, IT Data Governance & Compliance Manager, Intercept Pharmaceuticals Leticia Sobrado
    IT Data Governance & Compliance Manager
    Intercept Pharmaceuticals

    Select Your Data Platform

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}346|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 10.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $62,999 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 20 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Data Management
    • Parent Category Link: /data-management

    Every organization needs a data management (DM) platform that enables the DM capabilities required. This could be a daunting task because:

    • Every organization has a unique set of requirements for the DM platform.
    • Software products are difficult to compare because every vendor provides a unique set of features.
    • Software vendors are interested in getting as large a footprint as possible.
    • Some products from different categories offer the same functionalities.
    • Some products are just not compatible.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Technology requirements start with the business goals.
    • Data platform selection should be based on common best practices and, at the same time, be optimized for the organization’s specific needs and goals and support an evolutionary platform development.
    • What is best for one organization may be totally unacceptable for another – all for very valid reasons.

    Impact and Result

    Understand your current environment and use proven reference architecture patterns to expedite building the data management platform that matches your needs.

    • Use a holistic approach.
    • Understand your goals and priorities.
    • Picture your target-state architecture.
    • Identify your current technology coverage.
    • Select the software covering the gaps in technology enablement based on feature/functional enablement descriptions as well as vendor and deployment preferences.

    Select Your Data Platform Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out what challenges are typically in the way of designing a data platform, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand how we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Select your data platform

    Assess your current environment, find the right reference architecture pattern, and match identified capabilities with software features.

    • Data Platform Design Assessment
    • Reference Architecture Pattern

    Infographic

    ChatGPT Beyond the hype. What can it do for you?

    Summary of the deck.

    ChatGPT is a generative AI tool developed by OpenAI, a non-profit founded by Silicon Valley titans, including Elon Musk and Sam Altman. It is designed to interact with users in a way that mimics human dialogue. The tool became available via a research release on November 30, 2022, and was an immediate hit – within a week; it attracted more than a million users. Functionally, ChatGPT is designed to answer questions, but it is not the first one. The concept has existed for decades. While it is very powerful, it has also attracted criticism. 

    IT Operations, strategy

    Register to read more …

    How to build a Service Desk Chatbot POC

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}16|cart{/j2store}
    • Related Products: {j2store}16|crosssells{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.7/10
    • member rating average dollars saved: 11,197
    • member rating average days saved: 8
    • Parent Category Name: Service Desk
    • Parent Category Link: /service-desk

    The challenge

    Build a chatbot that creates value for your business

     

    • Ensure your chatbot meets your business needs.
    • Bring scalability to your customer service delivery in a cost-effective manner.
    • Measure your chatbot objectives with clear metrics.
    • Pre-determine your ticket categories to use during the proof of concept.

    Our advice

    Insight

    • Build your chatbot to create business value. Whether increasing service or resource efficiency, keep value creation in mind when making decisions with your proof of concept.

    Impact and results 

    • When implemented effectively, chatbots can help save costs, generate new revenue, and ultimately increase customer satisfaction for external and internal-facing customers.

    The roadmap

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you building a chatbot proof of concept is a good idea, review our methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you to successfully complete this project. Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    Start here

    Form your chatbot strategy.

    Build the right metrics to measure the success of your chatbot POC

    • Chatbot ROI Calculator (xls)
    • Chatbot POC Metrics Tool (xls)

    Build the foundation for your chatbot.

    Architect the chatbot to maximize business value

    • Chatbot Conversation Tree Library

    Continue to improve your chatbot.

    Now take your chatbot proof of concept to production

    • Chatbot POC RACI (doc)
    • Chatbot POC Implementation Roadmap (xls)
    • Chatbot POC Communication Plan (doc)Chatbot ROI Calculator (xls)

    Hire or Develop a World-Class CISO

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}243|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Security Strategy & Budgeting
    • Parent Category Link: /security-strategy-and-budgeting
    • It is difficult to find a “unicorn”: a candidate who is already fully developed in all areas.
    • The role of the CISO has changed so much in the past three years, it is unclear what competencies are most important.
    • Current CISOs need to scope out areas of future development.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    The new security leader must be strategic, striking a balance between being tactical and taking a proactive security stance. They must incorporate security into business practices from day one and enable secure adoption of new technologies and business practices.

    Impact and Result

    • Clarify the competencies that are important to your organizational needs and use them to find a candidate with those specific strengths.
    • If you are a current CISO, complete a self-assessment and identify your high-priority competency gaps so you can actively work to develop those areas.
    • Create an actionable plan to develop the CISO’s capabilities and regularly reassess these items to ensure constant improvement.

    Hire or Develop a World-Class CISO Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Hire of Develop a World-Class CISO Deck – A step-by-step guide on finding or developing the CISO that best fits your organization.

    Use this blueprint to hire or develop a world-class Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) with the competencies that suit your specific organizational needs. Once you have identified the right candidate, create a plan to develop your CISO.

    • Hire or Develop a World-Class CISO – Phases 1-4

    2. CISO Core Competency Evaluation Tool – Determine which competencies your organization needs and which competencies your CISO needs to work on.

    This tool will help you determine which competencies are a priority for your organizational needs and which competencies your CISO needs to develop.

    • CISO Core Competency Evaluation Tool

    3. CISO Stakeholder Power Map Template – Visualize stakeholder and CISO relationships.

    Use this template to identify stakeholders who are key to your security initiatives and to understand your relationships with them.

    • CISO Stakeholder Power Map Template

    4. CISO Stakeholder Management Strategy Template – Develop a strategy to improve stakeholder and CISO relationships.

    Create a strategy to cultivate your stakeholder relationships and manage each relationship in the most effective way.

    • CISO Stakeholder Management Strategy Template

    5. CISO Development Plan Template – Develop a plan to support a world-class CISO.

    This tool will help you create and implement a plan to remediate competency gaps.

    • CISO Development Plan Template

    Infographic

    Further reading

    Hire or Develop a World-Class CISO

    Find a strategic and security-focused champion for your business.

    Analyst Perspective

    Create a plan to become the security leader of tomorrow

    The days are gone when the security leader can stay at a desk and watch the perimeter. The rapidly increasing sophistication of technology, and of attackers, has changed the landscape so that a successful information security program must be elastic, nimble, and tailored to the organization’s specific needs.

    The Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) is tasked with leading this modern security program, and this individual must truly be a Chief Officer, with a finger on the pulses of the business and security processes at the same time. The modern, strategic CISO must be a master of all trades.

    A world-class CISO is a business enabler who finds creative ways for the business to take on innovative processes that provide a competitive advantage and, most importantly, to do so securely.

    Cameron Smith, Research Lead, Security and Privacy

    Cameron Smith
    Research Lead, Security & Privacy
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    • CEOs/CXOs are looking to hire or develop a senior security leader and aren’t sure where to start.
    • Conversely, security practitioners are looking to upgrade their skill set and are equally stuck in terms of what an appropriate starting point is.
    • Organizations are looking to optimize their security plans and move from a tactical position to a more strategic one.

    Common Obstacles

    • It is difficult to find a “unicorn”: a candidate who is already fully developed in all areas.
    • The role of the CISO has changed so much in the past three years, it is unclear what competencies are most important.
    • You are a current CISO and need to scope out your areas of future development.

    Info-Tech’s Approach

    • Clarify the competencies that are important to your organizational needs and use them to find a candidate with those specific strengths.
    • If you are a current CISO, complete a self-assessment and identify your high-priority competency gaps so you can actively work to develop those areas.
    • Create an actionable plan to develop the CISO’s capabilities and regularly reassess these items to ensure constant improvement.

    Info-Tech Insight
    The new security leader must be strategic, striking a balance between being tactical and taking a proactive security stance. They must incorporate security into business practices from day one and enable secure adoption of new technologies and business practices.

    Your challenge

    This Info-Tech blueprint will help you hire and develop a strategic CISO

    • Security without strategy is a hacker’s paradise.
    • The outdated model of information security is tactical, where security acts as a watchdog and responds.
    • The new security leader must be strategic, striking a balance between being tactical and taking a proactive security stance. They must incorporate security into business practices from day one and enable secure adoption of new technologies and business practices.

    Around one in five organizations don’t have an individual with the sole responsibility for security1

    1 Navisite

    Info-Tech Insight
    Assigning security responsibilities to departments other than security can lead to conflicts of interest.

    Common obstacles

    It can be difficult to find the right CISO for your organization

    • The smaller the organization, the less likely it will have a CISO or equivalent position.
    • Because there is a shortage of qualified candidates, qualified CISOs can demand high salaries and many CISO positions will go unfilled.
    • It is easier for larger companies to attract top CISO talent, as they generally have more resources available.

    Source: Navisite

    Only 36% of small businesses have a CISO (or equivalent position).

    48% of mid-sized businesses have a CISO.

    90% of large organizations have a CISO.

    Source: Navisite

    Strategic versus tactical

    CISOs should provide leadership based on a strategic vision 1

    Strategic CISO Tactical CISO

    Proactive

    Focus is on protecting hyperdistributed business processes and data

    Elastic, flexible, and nimble

    Engaged in business design decisions

    Speaks the language of the audience (e.g. business, financial, technical)

    Reactive

    Focus is on protecting current state

    Perimeter and IT-centric approach

    Communicates with technical jargon

    1 Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology

    Info-Tech has identified three key behaviors of the world-class CISO

    To determine what is required from tomorrow’s security leader, Info-Tech examined the core behaviors that make a world-class CISO. These are the three areas that a CISO engages with and excels in.

    Later in this blueprint, we will review the competencies and skills that are required for your CISO to perform these behaviors at a high level.

    Align

    Aligning security enablement with business requirements

    Enable

    Enabling a culture of risk management

    Manage

    Managing talent and change

    Info-Tech Insight
    Through these three overarching behaviors, you can enable a security culture that is aligned to the business and make security elastic, flexible, and nimble to maintain the business processes.

    Info-Tech’s approach

    Understand what your organization needs in a CISO: Consider the core competencies of a CISO. Assess: Assess candidates' core competencies and the CISO's stakeholder relationships. Plan improvements: Identify resources to close competency gaps and an approach to improve stakeholder relationships. Executive development: Decide next steps to support your CISO moving forward and regularly reassess to measure progress.

    Info-Tech’s methodology to Develop or Hire a World-Class CISO

    1. Launch 2. Assess 3. Plan 4. Execute
    Phase Steps
    1. Understand the core competencies
    2. Measure security and business satisfaction and alignment
    1. Assess stakeholder relationships
    2. Assess core competencies
    1. Identify resources to address your CISO’s competency gaps
    2. Plan an approach to improve stakeholder relationships
    1. Decide next actions and support your CISO moving forward
    2. Regularly reassess to measure development and progress
    Phase Outcomes

    At the end of this phase, you will have:

    • Determined the current gaps in satisfaction and business alignment for your IT security program.
    • Identified the desired qualities in a security leader, specific to your current organizational needs.

    At the end of this phase, you will have:

    • Used the core competencies to help identify the ideal candidate.
    • Identified areas for development in your new or existing CISO.
    • Determined stakeholder relationships to cultivate.

    At the end of this phase, you will have:

    • Created a high-level plan to address any deficiencies.
    • Improved stakeholder relations.

    At the end of this phase, you will have:

    • Created an action-based development plan, including relevant metrics, due dates, and identified stakeholders. This plan is the beginning, not the end. Continually reassessing your organizational needs and revisiting this blueprint’s method will ensure ongoing development.

    Blueprint deliverables

    Each step of this blueprint is accompanied by supporting deliverables to help you accomplish your goals:

    CISO Core Competency Evaluation Tool

    Assess the competency levels of a current or prospective CISO and identify areas for improvement.

    Stakeholder Power Map Template

    Visualize the importance of various stakeholders and their concerns.

    Stakeholder Management Strategy Template

    Document a plan to manage stakeholders and track actions.

    Key deliverable:

    CISO Development Plan Template

    The CISO Development Plan Template is used to map specific activities and time frames for competency development to address gaps and achieve your goal.

    Strategic competencies will benefit the organization and the CISO

    Career development should not be seen as an individual effort. By understanding the personal core competencies that Info-Tech has identified, the individual wins by developing relevant new skills and the organization wins because the CISO provides increased value.

    Organizational Benefits Individual Benefits
    • Increased alignment between security and business objectives
    • Development of information security that is elastic, nimble, and flexible for the business
    • Reduction in wasted efforts and resources, and improvement in efficiency of security and the organization as a whole
    • True synergy between security and business stakeholders, where the goals of both groups are being met
    • Increased opportunity as you become a trusted partner within your organization
    • Improved relationships with peers and stakeholders
    • Less resistance and more support for security initiatives
    • More involvement and a stronger role for security at all levels of the organization

    Measured value of a world-class CISO

    Organizations with a CISO saw an average of $145,000 less in data breach costs.1

    However, we aren’t talking about hiring just any CISO. This blueprint seeks to develop your CISO’s competencies and reach a new level of effectiveness.

    Organizations invest a median of around $375,000 annually in their CISO.2 The CISO would have to be only 4% more effective to represent $15,000 more value from this position. This would offset the cost of an Info-Tech workshop, and this conservative estimate pales in comparison to the tangible and intangible savings as shown below.

    Your specific benefits will depend on many factors, but the value of protecting your reputation, adopting new and secure revenue opportunities, and preventing breaches cannot be overstated. There is a reason that investment in information security is on the rise: Organizations are realizing that the payoff is immense and the effort is worthwhile.

    Tangible cost savings from having a world-class CISO Intangible cost savings from having a world-class CISO
    • Cost savings from incident reduction.
    • Cost savings achieved through optimizing information security investments, resulting in savings from previously misdiagnosed issues.
    • Cost savings from ensuring that dollars spent on security initiatives support business strategy.
    • More opportunities to create new business processes through greater alignment between security and business.
    • Improved reputation and brand equity achieved through a proper evaluation of the organization’s security posture.
    • Continuous improvement achieved through a good security assessment and measurement strategy.
    • Ability to plan for the future since less security time will be spent firefighting and more time will be spent engaged with key stakeholders.

    1 IBM Security
    2 Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc.

    Case Study

    In the middle of difficulty lies opportunity

    SOURCE
    Kyle Kennedy
    CISO, CyberSN.com

    Challenge
    The security program identified vulnerabilities at the database layer that needed to be addressed.

    The decision was made to move to a new vendor. There were multiple options, but the best option in the CISO’s opinion was a substantially more expensive service that provided more robust protection and more control features.

    The CISO faced the challenge of convincing the board to make a financial investment in his IT security initiative to implement this new software.

    Solution
    The CISO knew he needed to express this challenge (and his solution!) in a way that was meaningful for the executive stakeholders.

    He identified that the business has $100 million in revenue that would move through this data stream. This new software would help to ensure the security of all these transactions, which they would lose in the event of a breach.

    Furthermore, the CISO identified new business plans in the planning stage that could be protected under this initiative.

    Results
    The CISO was able to gain support for and implement the new database platform, which was able to protect current assets more securely than before. Also, the CISO allowed new revenue streams to be created securely.

    This approach is the opposite of the cautionary tales that make news headlines, where new revenue streams are created before systems are put in place to secure them.

    This proactive approach is the core of the world-class CISO.

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    Guided Implementation

    What does a typical GI on this topic look like?

    Launch Assess Plan Execute

    Call #1: Review and discuss CISO core competencies.

    Call #2: Discuss Security Business Satisfaction and Alignment diagnostic results.

    Call #3: Discuss the CISO Stakeholder Power Map Template and the importance of relationships.

    Call #4: Discuss the CISO Core Competency Evaluation Tool.

    Call #5: Discuss results of the CISO Core Competency Evaluation and identify resources to close gaps.

    Call #6: Review organizational structure and key stakeholder relationships.

    Call #7: Discuss and create your CISO development plan and track your development

    A Guided Implementation (GI) is a series of calls with an Info-Tech analyst to help implement our best practices in your organization.

    A typical GI is 6 to 10 calls over the course of 3 to 6 months.

    Phase 1

    Launch

    Phase 1
    1.1 Understand Core Competencies
    1.2 Measure Security and Business Satisfaction and Alignment

    Phase 2
    2.1 Assess Stakeholder Relationships
    2.2 Assess the Core Competencies

    Phase 3
    3.1 Identify Resources to Address Competency Gaps
    3.2 Plan Approach to Improve Stakeholder Relationships

    Phase 4
    4.1 Decide Next Actions and Support Your CISO Moving Forward
    4.2 Regularly Reassess to Measure Development and Progress

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Review and understand the core competencies of a world-class CISO.
    • Launch your diagnostic survey.
    • Evaluate current business satisfaction with IT security.
    • Determine the competencies that are valuable to your IT security program’s needs.

    Hire or Develop a World-Class CISO

    Case study

    Mark Lester
    InfoSec Manager, SC Ports Authority

    An organization hires a new Information Security Manager into a static and well-established IT department.

    Situation: The organization acknowledges the need for improved information security, but there is no framework for the Security Manager to make successful changes.

    Challenges Next Steps
    • The Security Manager is an outsider in a company with well-established habits and protocols. He is tasked with revamping the security strategy to create unified threat management.
    • Initial proposals for information security improvements are rejected by executives. It is a challenge to implement changes or gain support for new initiatives.
    • The Security Manager will engage with individuals in the organization to learn about the culture and what is important to them.
    • He will assess existing misalignments in the business so that he can target problems causing real pains to individuals.

    Follow this case study throughout the deck to see this organization’s results

    Step 1.1

    Understand the Core Competencies of a World-Class CISO

    Activities

    Review core competencies the security leader must develop to become a strategic business partner

    This step involves the following participants:

    • CEO or other executive seeking to hire/develop a CISO

    or

    • Current CISO seeking to upgrade capabilities

    Outcomes of this step
    Analysis and understanding of the eight strategic CISO competencies required to become a business partner

    Launch

    Core competencies

    Info-Tech has identified eight core competencies affecting the CISO’s progression to becoming a strategic business partner.

    Business Acumen
    A CISO must focus primarily on the needs of the business.

    Leadership
    A CISO must be a security leader and not simply a practitioner.

    Communication
    A CISO must have executive communication skills

    Technical Knowledge
    A CISO must have a broad technical understanding.

    Innovative Problem Solving
    A good CISO doesn’t just say “no,” but rather finds creative ways to say “yes.”

    Vendor Management
    Vendor and financial management skills are critical to becoming a strategic CISO.

    Change Management
    A CISO improves security processes by being an agent of change for the organization.

    Collaboration
    A CISO must be able to use alliances and partnerships strategically.

    1.1 Understand the core competencies a CISO must focus on to become a strategic business partner

    < 1 hour

    Over the next few slides, review each world-class CISO core competency. In Step 1.2, you will determine which competencies are a priority for your organization.

    CISO Competencies Description
    Business Acumen

    A CISO must focus primarily on the needs of the business and how the business works, then determine how to align IT security initiatives to support business initiatives. This includes:

    • Contributing to business growth with an understanding of the industry, core functions, products, services, customers, and competitors.
    • Understanding the business’ strategic direction and allowing it to securely capitalize on opportunities.
    • Understanding the key drivers of business performance and the use of sound business practice.
    Leadership

    A CISO must be a security leader, and not simply a practitioner. This requires:

    • Developing a holistic view of security, risk, and compliance for the organization.
    • Fostering a culture of risk management.
    • Choosing a strong team. Having innovative and reliable employees who do quality work is a critical component of an effective department.
      • This aspect involves identifying talent, engaging your staff, and managing their time and abilities.

    1.1 Understand the core competencies (continued)

    CISO Competencies Description
    Communication

    Many CISOs believe that using technical jargon impresses their business stakeholders – in fact, it only makes business stakeholders become confused and disinterested. A CISO must have executive communication skills. This involves:

    • Clearly communicating with business leaders in meaningful language (i.e. business, financial, social) that they understand by breaking down the complexities of IT security into simple and relatable concepts.
    • Not using acronyms or technological speak. Easy-to-understand translations will go a long way.
    • Strong public speaking and presentation abilities.
    Technical Knowledge

    A CISO must have a broad technical understanding of IT security to oversee a successful security program. This includes:

    • Understanding key security and general IT technologies and processes.
    • Assembling a complementary team, because no individual can have deep knowledge in all areas.
    • Maintaining continuing education to stay on top of emerging technologies and threats.

    1.1 Understand the core competencies (continued)

    CISO Competencies Description
    Innovative Problem Solving

    A good CISO doesn’t just say “no,” but rather finds creative ways to say “yes.” This can include:

    • Taking an active role in seizing opportunities created by emerging technologies.
    • Facilitating the secure implementation of new, innovative revenue models.
    • Developing solutions for complex business problems that require creativity and ingenuity.
    • Using information and technology to drive value around the customer experience.
    Vendor Management

    With the growing use of “anything as a service,” negotiation, vendor, and financial management skills are critical to becoming a strategic CISO.

    • The CISO must be able to evaluate service offerings and secure favorable contracts with the right provider. It is about extracting the maximum value from vendors for the dollars you are spending.
    • Vendor products must be aligned with future business plans to create maximum ongoing value.
    • The CISO must develop financial management skills. This includes the ability to calculate total cost of ownership, return on investment, and project spending over multiyear business plans.

    1.1 Understand the core competencies (continued)

    CISO Competencies Description
    Change Management

    A world-class CISO improves security processes by being an agent of change for the organization. This involves:

    • Leading, guiding, and motivating teams to adopt a responsible risk management culture.
    • Communicating important and complex ideas in a persuasive way.
    • Demonstrating an ability to change themselves and taking the initiative in adopting more efficient behaviors.
    • Handling unplanned change, such as unforeseen attacks or personnel changes, in a professional and proactive manner.
    Collaboration

    A CISO must be able to use alliances and partnerships strategically to benefit both the business and themselves. This includes:

    • Identifying formal and informal networks and constructive relationships to enable security development.
    • Leveraging stakeholders to influence positive outcomes for the organization.
    • Getting out of the IT or IT security sphere and engaging relationships in diverse areas of the organization.

    Step 1.2

    Evaluate satisfaction and alignment between the business and IT security

    Activities

    • Conduct the Information Security Business Satisfaction and Alignment diagnostic
    • Use your results as input into the CISO Core Competency Evaluation Tool

    This step involves the following participants:

    • CEO or other executive seeking to hire/develop a CISO

    or

    • Current CISO seeking to upgrade capabilities

    Outcomes of this step
    Determine current gaps in satisfaction and alignment between information security and your organization.

    If seeking to hire/develop a CISO: Your diagnostic results will help develop a profile of the ideal CISO candidate to use as a hiring and interview guide.

    If developing a current CISO, use your diagnostic results to identify existing competency gaps and target them for improvement.

    For the CISO seeking to upgrade capabilities: Use the core competencies guide to self-assess and identify competencies that require improvement.

    Launch

    1.2 Get started by conducting Info-Tech’s Information Security Business Satisfaction and Alignment diagnostic

    Suggested Time: One week for distribution, completion, and collection of surveys
    One-hour follow-up with an Info-Tech analyst

    The primary goal of IT security is to protect the organization from threats. This does not simply mean bolting everything down, but it means enabling business processes securely. To do this effectively requires alignment between IT security and the overall business.

    • Once you have completed the diagnostic, call Info-Tech to review your results with one of our analysts.
    • The results from this assessment will provide insights to inform your entries in the CISO Core Competency Evaluation Tool.

    Call an analyst to review your results and provide you with recommendations.

    Info-Tech Insight
    Focus on the high-priority competencies for your organization. You may find a candidate with perfect 10s across the board, but a more pragmatic strategy is to find someone with strengths that align with your needs. If there are other areas of weakness, then target those areas for development.

    1.2 Use Info-Tech’s CISO Core Competency Evaluation Tool to understand your organizational needs

    After completing the Info-Tech diagnostic, use the CISO Core Competency Evaluation Tool to determine which CISO competencies are a priority for your organization.

    • Your diagnostic results will indicate where your information security program is aligned well or poorly with your business.
    • For example, the diagnostic may show significant misalignment between information security and executives over the level of external compliance. The CISO behavior that would contribute to solving this is aligning security enablement with business requirements.
      • This misalignment may be due to a misunderstanding by either party. The competencies that will contribute to resolving this are communication, technical knowledge, and business acumen.
      • This mapping method is what will be used to determine which competencies are most important for your needs at the present moment.

    Download the CISO Core Competency Evaluation Tool

    1.2 Use Info-Tech’s CISO Core Competency Evaluation Tool to understand your organizational needs

    After completing the Info-Tech diagnostic, use the CISO Core Competency Evaluation Tool to determine which CISO competencies are a priority for your organization.

    1. Starting on Tab 2: CISO Core Competencies, use your understanding of each competency from section 1.1 along with the definitions described in the tool.
      • For each competency, assign a degree of importance using the drop-down menu in the second column from the right.
      • Importance ratings will range from not at all important at the low end to critically important at the high end.
      • Your importance score will be influenced by several factors, including:
        • The current alignment of your information security department.
        • Your organizational security posture.
        • The size and structure of your organization.
        • The existing skills and maturity within your information security department.

    Download the CISO Core Competency Evaluation Tool

    1.2 Use Info-Tech’s CISO Core Competency Evaluation Tool to understand your organizational needs

    After completing the Info-Tech diagnostic, use the CISO Core Competency Evaluation Tool to determine which CISO competencies are a priority for your organization.

    1. Still on Tab 2. CISO Core Competencies, you will now assign a current level of effectiveness for each competency.
      • This will range from foundational at a low level of effectiveness up to capable, then inspirational, and at the highest rating, transformational.
      • Again, this rating will be very specific to your organization, depending on your structure and your current employees.
      • Fundamentally, these scores will reflect what you want to improve in the area of information security. This is not an absolute scale, and it will be influenced by what skills you want to support your goals and direction as an organization.

    Download the CISO Core Competency Evaluation Tool

    Phase 2

    Assess

    Phase 1
    1.1 Understand Core Competencies
    1.2 Measure Security and Business Satisfaction and Alignment

    Phase 2
    2.1 Assess Stakeholder Relationships
    2.2 Assess the Core Competencies

    Phase 3
    3.2 Plan Approach to Improve Stakeholder Relationships

    Phase 4
    4.1 Decide Next Actions and Support Your CISO Moving Forward
    4.2 Regularly Reassess to Measure Development and Progress

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Use the CISO Core Competency Evaluation Tool to create and implement an interview guide.
    • Assess and analyze the core competencies of your prospective CISOs. Or, if you are a current CISO, use the CISO Core Competency Evaluation Tool as a self-analysis and identify areas for personal development.
    • Evaluate the influence, impact, and support of key executive business stakeholders using the CISO Stakeholder Power Map Template.

    Hire or Develop a World-Class CISO

    Case study

    Mark Lester
    InfoSec Manager, SC Ports Authority

    The new Security Manager engages with employees to learn the culture.

    Outcome: Understand what is important to individuals in order to create effective collaboration. People will engage with a project if they can relate it to something they value.

    Actions Next Steps
    • The Security Manager determines that he must use low-cost small wins to integrate with the organizational culture and create trust and buy-in and investment will follow.
    • The Security Manager starts a monthly newsletter to get traction across the organization, create awareness of his mandate to improve information security, and establish himself as a trustworthy partner.
    • The Security Manager will identify specific ways to engage and change the culture.
    • Create a persuasive case for investing in information security based on what resonates with the organization.

    Follow this case study throughout the deck to see this organization’s results

    Step 2.1

    Identify key stakeholders for the CISO and assess current relationships

    Activities

    Evaluate the power, impact, and support of key stakeholders

    This step involves the following participants:

    • CEO or other executive seeking to hire/develop a CISO

    or

    • Current CISO seeking to upgrade capabilities

    Outcomes of this step

    • Power map of executive business stakeholders
    • Evaluation of each stakeholder in terms of influence, impact, and current level of support

    Assess

    Identify key stakeholders who own business processes that intersect with security processes

    Info-Tech Insight
    Most organizations don’t exist for the sole purpose of doing information security. For example, if your organization is in the business of selling pencils, then information security is in business to enable the selling of pencils. All the security in the world is meaningless if it doesn’t enable your primary business processes. The CISO must always remember the fundamental goals of the business.

    The above insight has two implications:

    1. The CISO needs to understand the key business processes and who owns them, because these are the people they will need to collaborate with. Like any C-level, the CISO should be one of the most knowledgeable people in the organization regarding business processes.
    2. Each of these stakeholders stands to win or lose depending on the performance of their process, and they can act to either block or enable your progress.
      • To work effectively with these stakeholders, you must learn what is important to them, and pose your initiatives so that you both benefit.

    When people are not receptive to the CISO, it’s usually because the CISO has not been part of the discussion when plans were being made. This is the heart of proactivity.

    You need to be involved from the start … from the earliest part of planning.

    The job is not to come in late and say “No” ... the job is to be involved early and find creative and intelligent ways to say “Yes.”

    The CISO needs to be the enabling security asset that drives business.

    – Elliot Lewis, CEO at Keyavi Data

    Evaluate the importance of business stakeholders and the support necessary from them

    The CISO Stakeholder Power Map Template is meant to provide a visualization of the CISO’s relationships within the organization. This should be a living document that can be updated throughout the year as relationships develop and the structure of an organization changes.

    At a glance, this tool should show:

    • How influential each stakeholder is within the company.
    • How supportive they currently are of the CISO’s initiatives.
    • How strongly each person is impacted by IT security activities.

    Once this tool has been created, it provides a good reference as the CISO works to develop lagging relationships. It shows the landscape of influence and impact within the organization, which may help to guide the CISO’s strategy in the future.

    Evaluate the importance of business stakeholders and the support necessary from them

    Download the CISO Stakeholder Power Map Template

    Evaluate the importance of business stakeholders and the support necessary from them

    1. Identify key stakeholders.
      1. Focus on owners of important business processes.
    2. Evaluate and map each stakeholder in terms of:
      1. Influence (up/down)
      2. Support (left/right)
      3. Impact (size of circle)
      4. Involvement (color of circle)
    3. Decide whether the level of support from each stakeholder needs to change to facilitate success.

    Evaluate the importance of business stakeholders and the support necessary from them

    Info-Tech Insight
    Some stakeholders must work closely with your incoming CISO. It is worth consideration to include these individuals in the interview process to ensure you will have partners that can work well together. This small piece of involvement early on can save a lot of headache in the future.

    Where can you find your desired CISO?

    Once you know which competencies are a priority in your new CISO, the next step is to decide where to start looking. This person may already exist in your company.

    Internal

    Take some time to review your current top information security employees or managers. It may be immediately clear that certain people will or will not be suitable for the CISO role. For those that have potential, proceed to Step 2.2 to map their competencies.

    Recruitment

    If you do not have any current employees that will fit your new CISO profile, or you have other reasons for wanting to bring in an outside individual, you can begin the recruitment process. This could start by posting the position for applications or by identifying and targeting specific candidates.

    Ready to start looking for your ideal candidate? You can use Info-Tech’s Chief Information Security Officer job description template.

    Use the CISO job description template

    Alternatives to hiring a CISO

    Small organizations are less able to muster the resources required to find and retain a CISO,

    Technical Counselor Seat

    In addition to having access to our research and consulting services, you can acquire a Technical Counselor Seat from our Security & Risk practice, where one of our senior analysts would serve with you on a retainer. You may find that this option saves you the expense of having to hire a new CISO altogether.

    Virtual CISO

    A virtual CISO, or vCISO, is essentially a “CISO as a service.” A vCISO provides an organization with an experienced individual that can, on a part-time basis, lead the organization’s security program through policy and strategy development.

    Why would an organization consider a vCISO?

    • A vCISO can provide services that are flexible, technical, and strategic and that are based on the specific requirements of the organization.
    • They can provide a small organization with program maturation within the organization’s resources.
    • They can typically offer depth of experience beyond what a small business could afford if it were to pursue a full-time CISO.

    Source: InfoSec Insights by Sectigo Store

    Why would an organization not consider a vCISO?

    • The vCISO’s attention is divided among their other clients.
    • They won’t feel like a member of your organization.
    • They won’t have a deep understanding of your systems and processes.

    Source: Georgia State University

    Step 2.2

    Assess CISO candidates and evaluate their current competency

    Activities

    Assess CISO candidates in terms of desired core competencies

    or

    Self-assess your personal core competencies

    This step involves the following participants:

    • CEO or other executive seeking to hire/develop a CISO

    or

    • Current CISO seeking to upgrade capabilities

    and

    • Any key stakeholders or collaborators you choose to include in the assessment process

    Outcomes of this step

    • You have assessed your requirements for a CISO candidate.
    • The process of hiring is under way, and you have decided whether to hire a CISO, develop a CISO, or consider a Counselor Seat as another option.

    Assess

    2.2 Use Info-Tech’s CISO Core Competency Evaluation Tool to assess your CISO candidate

    Use Info-Tech’s CISO Core Competency Evaluation Tool to assess your CISO candidate

    Download the CISO Core Competency Evaluation Tool

    Info-Tech Insight
    The most important competencies should be your focus. Unless you are lucky enough to find a candidate that is perfect across the board, you will see some areas that are not ideal. Don’t forget the importance you assigned to each competency. If a candidate is ideal in the most critical areas, you may not mind that some development is needed in a less important area.

    2.2 Use Info-Tech’s CISO Core Competency Evaluation Tool to evaluate your candidates

    After deciding the importance of and requirements for each competency in Phase 1, assess your CISO candidates.

    Your first pass on this tool will be to look at internal candidates. This is the develop a CISO option.

    1. In the previous phase, you rated the Importance and Current Effectiveness for each competency in Tab 2. CISO Core Competencies. In this step, use Tab 3. Gap Analysis to enter a Minimum Level and a Desired Level for each competency. Keep in mind that it may be unrealistic to expect a candidate to be fully developed in all aspects.
    2. Next, enter a rating for your candidate of interest for each of the eight competencies.
    3. This scorecard will generate an overall suitability score for the candidate. The color of the output (from red to green) indicates the suitability, and the intensity of the color indicates the importance you assigned to that competency.

    Download the CISO Core Competency Evaluation Tool

    2.2 Use Info-Tech’s CISO Core Competency Evaluation Tool to evaluate your candidates

    • If the internal search does not identify a suitable candidate, you will want to expand your search.
    • Repeat the scoring process for external candidates until you find your new CISO.
    • You may want to skip your external search altogether and instead contact Info-Tech for more information on our Counselor Seat options.

    Download the CISO Core Competency Evaluation Tool

    Phase 3

    Plan

    Phase 1
    1.1 Understand Core Competencies
    1.2 Measure Security and Business Satisfaction and Alignment

    Phase 2
    2.1 Assess Stakeholder Relationships
    2.2 Assess the Core Competencies

    Phase 3
    3.1 Identify Resources to Address Competency Gaps
    3.2 Plan Approach to Improve Stakeholder Relationships

    Phase 4
    4.1 Decide Next Actions and Support Your CISO Moving Forward
    4.2 Regularly Reassess to Measure Development and Progress

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Create a plan to develop your competency gaps.
    • Construct and consider your organizational model.
    • Create plan to cultivate key stakeholder relationships.

    Hire or Develop a World-Class CISO

    Case study

    Mark Lester
    InfoSec Manager, SC Ports Authority

    The new Security Manager changes the security culture by understanding what is meaningful to employees.

    Outcome: Engage with people on their terms. The CISO must speak the audience’s language and express security terms in a way that is meaningful to the audience.

    Actions Next Steps
    • The Security Manager identifies recent events where ransomware and social engineering attacks were successful in penetrating the organization.
    • He uses his newsletter to create organization-wide discussion on this topic.
    • This very personal example makes employees more receptive to the Security Manager’s message, enabling the culture of risk management.
    • The Security Manager will leverage his success in improving the information security culture and awareness to gain support for future initiatives.

    Follow this case study throughout the deck to see this organization’s results

    Step 3.1

    Identify resources for your CISO to remediate competency gaps

    Activities

    Create a plan to remediate competency gaps

    This step involves the following participants:

    • CEO or other executive seeking to hire/develop a CISO
    • The newly hired CISO

    or

    • Current CISO seeking to upgrade capabilities

    Outcomes of this step

    • Identification of core competency deficiencies
    • A plan to close the gaps

    Plan

    3.1 Close competency gaps with Info-Tech’s Cybersecurity Workforce Development Training

    Resources to close competency gaps

    Info-Tech’s Cybersecurity Workforce Training develops critical cybersecurity skills missing within your team and organization. The leadership track provides the same deep coverage of technical knowledge as the analyst track but adds hands-on support and has a focus on strategic business alignment, program management, and governance.

    The program builds critical skills through:

    • Standardized curriculum with flexible projects tailored to business needs
    • Realistic cyber range scenarios
    • Ready-to-deploy security deliverables
    • Real assurance of skill development

    Info-Tech Insight
    Investing in a current employee that has the potential to be a world-class CISO may take less time, effort, and money than finding a unicorn.

    Learn more on the Cybersecurity Workforce Development webpage

    3.1 Identify resources for your CISO to remediate competency gaps

    < 2 hours

    CISO Competencies Description
    Business Acumen

    Info-Tech Workshops & Blueprints

    Actions/Activities

    • Take a business acumen course: Acumen Learning, What the CEO Wants You to Know: Building Business Acumen.
    • Meet with business stakeholders. Ask them to take you through the strategic plan for their department and then identify opportunities where security can provide support to help drive their initiatives.
    • Shadow another C-level executive. Understand how they manage their business unit and demonstrate an eagerness to learn.
    • Pursue an MBA or take a business development course.

    3.1 Identify resources for your CISO to remediate competency gaps (continued)

    < 2 hours

    CISO Competencies Description
    Leadership

    Info-Tech Training and Blueprints

    Action/Activities

    • Communicate your vision for security to your team. You will gain buy-in from your employees by including them in the creation of your program, and they will be instrumental to your success.

    Info-Tech Insight
    Surround yourself with great people. Insecure leaders surround themselves with mediocre employees that aren’t perceived as a threat. Great leaders are supported by great teams, but you must choose that great team first.

    3.1 Identify resources for your CISO to remediate competency gaps (continued)

    < 2 hours

    CISO Competencies Description
    Communication

    Info-Tech Workshops & Blueprints

    Build and Deliver an Optimized IT Update Presentation: Show IT’s value and relevance by dropping the technical jargon and speaking to the business in their terms.

    Master Your Security Incident Response Communications Program: Learn how to talk to your stakeholders about what’s going on when things go wrong.

    Develop a Security Awareness and Training Program That Empowers End Users: Your weakest link is between the keyboard and the chair, so use engaging communication to create positive behavior change.

    Actions/Activities

    Learn to communicate in the language of your audience (whether business, finance, or social), and frame security solutions in terms that are meaningful to your listener.

    Technical Knowledge

    Actions/Activities

    • In many cases, the CISO is progressing from a strong technical background, so this area is likely a strength already.
    • However, as the need for executive skills are being recognized, many organizations are opting to hire a business or operations professional as a CISO. In this case, various Info-Tech blueprints across all our silos (e.g. Security, Infrastructure, CIO, Apps) will provide great value in understanding best practices and integrating technical skills with the business processes.
    • Pursue an information security leadership certification: GIAC, (ISC)², and ISACA are a few of the many organizations that offer certification programs.

    3.1 Identify resources for your CISO to remediate competency gaps (continued)

    < 2 hours

    CISO Competencies Description
    Innovative Problem Solving

    Info-Tech Workshops & Blueprints

    Actions/Activities

    Vendor Management

    Info-Tech Blueprints & Resources

    Actions/Activities

    3.1 Identify resources for your CISO to remediate competency gaps (continued)

    < 2 hours

    CISO Competencies Description
    Change Management

    Info-Tech Blueprints

    Actions/Activities

    • Start with an easy-win project to create trust and support for your initiatives.
    Collaboration

    Info-Tech Blueprints

    Actions/Activities

    • Get out of your office. Have lunch with people from all areas of the business. Understanding the goals and the pains of employees throughout your organization will help you to design effective initiatives and cultivate support.
    • Be clear and honest about your goals. If people know what you are trying to do, then it is much easier for them to work with you on it. Being ambiguous or secretive creates confusion and distrust.

    3.1 Create the CISO’s personal development plan

    • Use Info-Tech’s CISO Development Plan Template to document key initiatives that will close previously identified competency gaps.
    • The CISO Development Plan Template is used to map specific actions and time frames for competency development, with the goal of addressing competency gaps and helping you become a world-class CISO. This template can be used to document:
      • Core competency gaps
      • Security process gaps
      • Security technology gaps
      • Any other career/development goals
    • If you have a coach or mentor, you should share your plan and report progress to that person. Alternatively, call Info-Tech to speak with an executive advisor for support and advice.
      • Toll-Free: 1-888-670-8889

    What you will need to complete this exercise

    • CISO Core Competency Evaluation Tool results
    • Information Security Business Satisfaction and Alignment diagnostic results
    • Insights gathered from business stakeholder interviews

    Step 3.2

    Plan an approach to improve your relationships

    Activities

    • Review engagement strategies for different stakeholder types
    • Create a stakeholder relationship development plan

    This step involves the following participants:

    • CEO or other executive seeking to hire/develop a CISO
    • The newly hired CISO

    or

    • Current CISO seeking to upgrade capabilities

    Outcomes of this step

    • Stakeholder relationship strategy deliverable

    Plan

    Where should the CISO sit?

    Where the CISO sits in the organization can have a big impact on the security program.

    • Organizations with CISOs in the C-suite have a fewer security incidents.1
    • Organizations with CISOs in the C-suite generally have better IT ability.1
    • An organization whose CISO reports to the CIO risks conflict of interest.1
    • 51% of CISOs believe their effectiveness can be hampered by reporting lines.2
    • Only half of CISOs feel like they are in a position to succeed.2

    A formalized security organizational structure assigns and defines the roles and responsibilities of different members around security. Use Info-Tech’s blueprint Implement a Security Governance and Management Program to determine the best structure for your organization.

    Who the CISO reports to, by percentage of organizations3

    Who the CISO reports to, by percentage of organizations

    Download the Implement a Security Governance and Management Program blueprint

    1. Journal of Computer Science and Information
    2. Proofpoint
    3. Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc

    3.2 Make a plan to manage your key stakeholders

    Managing stakeholders requires engagement, communication, and relationship management. To effectively collaborate and gain support for your initiatives, you will need to build relationships with your stakeholders. Take some time to review the stakeholder engagement strategies for different stakeholder types.

    Influence Mediators
    (Satisfy)
    Key Players
    (Engage)
    Spectators
    (Monitor)
    Noisemakers
    (Inform)
    Support for you

    When building relationships, I find that what people care about most is getting their job done. We need to help them do this in the most secure way possible.

    I don’t want to be the “No” guy, I want to enable the business. I want to find to secure options and say, “Here is how we can do this.”

    – James Miller, Information Security Director, Xavier University

    Download the CISO Stakeholder Management Strategy Template

    Key players – Engage

    Goal Action
    Get key players to help champion your initiative and turn your detractors into supporters. Actively involve key players to take ownership.
    Keep It Positive Maintain a Close Relationship
    • Use their positive support to further your objectives and act as your foundation of support.
    • Key players can help you build consensus among other stakeholders.
    • Get supporters to be vocal in your town halls.
    • Ask them to talk to other stakeholders over whom they have influence.
    • Get some quick wins early to gain and maintain stakeholder support and help convert them to your cause.
    • Use their influence and support to help persuade blockers to see your point of view.
    • Collaborate closely. Key players are tuned in to information streams that are important. Their advice can keep you informed and save you from being blindsided.
    • Keep them happy. By definition, these individuals have a stake in your plans and can be affected positively or negatively. Going out of your way to maintain relationships can be well worth the effort.

    Info-Tech Insight
    Listen to your key players. They understand what is important to other business stakeholders, and they can provide valuable insight to guide your future strategy.

    Mediators – Satisfy

    Goal Action
    Turn mediators into key players Increase their support level.
    Keep It Positive Maintain a Close Relationship
    • Make stakeholders part of the conversation by consulting them for input on planning and strategy.
    • Sample phrases:
      • “I’ve heard you have experience in this area. Do you have time to answer a few questions?”
      • “I’m making some decisions and I would value your thoughts. Can I get your perspective on this?”
    • Enhance their commitment by being inclusive. Encourage their support whenever possible.
    • Make them feel acknowledged and solicit feedback.
    • Listen to blockers with an open mind to understand their point of view. They may have valuable insight.
    • Approach stakeholders on their individual playing fields.
      • They want to know that you understand their business perspective.
    • Stubborn mediators might never support you. If consulting doesn’t work, keep them informed of important decision-making points and give them the opportunity to be involved if they choose to be.

    Info-Tech Insight
    Don’t dictate to stakeholders. Make them feel like valued contributors by including them in development and decision making. You don’t have to incorporate all their input, but it is essential that they feel respected and heard.

    Noisemakers – Inform

    Goal Action
    Have noisemakers spread the word to increase their influence. Encourage noisemakers to influence key stakeholders.
    Keep It Positive Maintain a Close Relationship
    • Identify noisemakers who have strong relationships with key stakeholders and focus on them.
      • These individuals may not have decision-making power, but their opinions and advice may help to sway a decision in your favor.
    • Look for opportunities to increase their influence over others.
    • Put effort into maintaining the positive relationship so that it doesn’t dwindle.
    • You already have this group’s support, but don’t take it for granted.
    • Be proactive, pre-emptive, and transparent.
    • Address issues or bad news early and be careful not to exaggerate their significance.
    • Use one-on-one meetings to give them an opportunity to express challenges in a private setting.
    • Show individuals in this group that you are a problem-solver:
      • “The implementation was great, but we discovered problems afterward. Here is what we’re doing about it.”

    Spectators – Monitor

    Goal Action
    Keep spectators content and avoid turning them into detractors. Keep them well informed.
    Keep It Positive Maintain a Close Relationship
    • A hands-on approach is not required with this group.
    • Keep them informed with regular, high-altitude communications and updates.
    • Use positive, exciting announcements to increase their interest in your initiatives.
    • Select a good venue for generating excitement and assessing the mood of spectators.
    • Spectators may become either supporters or blockers. Monitor them closely and keep in touch with them to stop these individuals from becoming blockers.
    • Listen to questions from spectators carefully. View any engagement as an opportunity to increase participation from this group and generate a positive shift in interest.

    3.2 Create the CISO’s stakeholder management strategy

    Develop a strategy to manage key stakeholders in order to drive your personal development plan initiatives.

    • The purpose of the CISO Stakeholder Management Strategy Template is to document the results of the power mapping exercise, create a plan to proactively manage stakeholders, and track the actions taken.
    • Use this in concert with Info-Tech’s CISO Stakeholder Power Map Template to help visualize the importance of key stakeholders to your personal development. You will document:
      • Stakeholder role and type.
      • Current relationship with the stakeholder.
      • Level of power/influence and degree of impact.
      • Current and desired level of support.
      • Initiatives that require the stakeholder’s engagement.
      • Actions to be taken – along with the status and results.

    What you will need to complete this exercise

    • Completed CISO Stakeholder Power Map
    • Security Business Satisfaction and Alignment Diagnostic results

    Download the CISO Stakeholder Management Strategy Template

    Phase 4

    Execute

    Phase 1
    1.1 Understand Core Competencies
    1.2 Measure Security and Business Satisfaction and Alignment

    Phase 2
    2.1 Assess Stakeholder Relationships
    2.2 Assess the Core Competencies

    Phase 3
    3.1 Identify Resources to Address Competency Gaps
    3.2 Plan Approach to Improve Stakeholder Relationships

    Phase 4
    4.1 Decide Next Actions and Support Your CISO Moving Forward
    4.2 Regularly Reassess to Measure Development and Progress

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Populate the CISO Development Plan Template with appropriate targets and due dates.
    • Set review and reassess dates.
    • Review due dates with CISO.

    Hire or Develop a World-Class CISO

    Case study

    Mark Lester
    InfoSec Manager, SC Ports Authority

    The new Security Manager leverages successful cultural change to gain support for new security investments.

    Outcome: Integrating with the business on a small level and building on small successes will lead to bigger wins and bigger change.

    Actions Next Steps
    • By fostering positive relationships throughout the organization, the Security Manager has improved the security culture and established himself as a trusted partner.
    • In an organization that had seen very little change in years, he has used well developed change management, business acumen, leadership, communication, collaboration, and innovative problem-solving competencies to affect his initiatives.
    • He can now return to the board with a great deal more leverage in seeking support for security investments.
    • The Security Manager will leverage his success in improving the information security culture and awareness to gain support for future initiatives.

    Step 4.1

    Decide next actions and support your CISO moving forward

    Activities

    • Complete the Info-Tech CISO Development Plan Template
    • Create a stakeholder relationship development plan

    This step involves the following participants:

    • CEO or other executive seeking to hire/develop a CISO
    • The newly hired CISO

    or

    • Current CISO seeking to upgrade capabilities

    Outcomes of this step

    Next actions for each of your development initiatives

    Execute

    Establish a set of first actions to set your plan into motion

    The CISO Development Plan Template provides a simple but powerful way to focus on what really matters to execute your plan.

    • By this point, the CISO is working on the personal competency development while simultaneously overseeing improvements across the security program, managing stakeholders, and seeking new business initiatives to engage with. This can be a lot to juggle effectively.
    • Disparate initiatives like these can hinder progress by creating confusion.
    • By distilling your plan down to Subject > Action > Outcome, you immediately restore focus and turn your plans into actionable items.
    • The outcome is most valuable when it is measurable. This makes progress (or lack of it) very easy to track and assess, so choose a meaningful metric.
    Item to Develop
    (competency/process/tech)
    First Action Toward Development
    Desired Outcome, Including a Measurable Indicator

    Download the CISO Development Plan Template

    4.1 Create a CISO development plan to keep all your objectives in one place

    Use Info-Tech’s CISO Development Plan Template to create a quick and simple yet powerful tool that you can refer to and update throughout your personal and professional development initiatives. As instructed in the template, you will document the following:

    Your Item to Develop The Next Action Required The Target Outcome
    This could be a CISO competency, a security process item, a security technology item, or an important relationship (or something else that is a priority). This could be as simple as “schedule lunch with a stakeholder” or “email Info-Tech to schedule a Guided Implementation call.” This part of the tool is meant to be continually updated as you progress through your projects. The strength of this approach is that it focuses your project into simple actionable steps that are easily achieved, rather than looking too far down the road and seeing an overwhelming task ahead. This will be something measurable like “reduce spending by 10%” or “have informal meeting with leaders from each department.”

    Info-Tech Insight
    A good plan doesn’t require anything that is outside of your control. Good measurable outcomes are behavior based rather than state based.
    “Increase the budget by 10%” is a bad goal because it is ultimately reliant on someone else and can be derailed by an unsupportive executive. A better goal is “reduce spending by 10%.” This is something more within the CISO’s control and is thus a better performance indicator and a more achievable goal.

    4.1 Create a CISO development plan to keep all your objectives in one place

    Below you will find sample content to populate your CISO Development Plan Template. Using this template will guide your CISO in achieving the goals identified here.

    The template itself is a metric for assessing the development of the CISO. The number of targets achieved by the due date will help to quantify the CISO’s progress.

    You may also want to include improvements to the organization’s security program as part of the CISO development plan.

    Area for Development Item for Development Next Action Required Key Stakeholders/ Owners Target Outcome Due Date Completed
    Core Competencies:
    Communication
    Executive
    communication
    Take economics course to learn business language Course completed [Insert date] [Y/N]
    Core Competencies:
    Communication
    Improve stakeholder
    relationships
    Email Bryce from finance to arrange lunch Improved relationship with finance department [Insert date] [Y/N]
    Technology Maturity: Security Prevention Identity and access management (IAM) system Call Info-Tech to arrange call on IAM solutions 90% of employees entered into IAM system [Insert date] [Y/N]
    Process Maturity: Response & Recovery Disaster recovery Read Info-Tech blueprint on disaster recovery Disaster recovery and backup policies in place [Insert date] [Y/N]

    Check out the First 100 Days as CISO blueprint for guidance on bringing improvements to the security program

    4.1 Use your action plan to track development progress and inform stakeholders

    • As you progress toward your goals, continually update the CISO development plan. It is meant to be a living document.
    • The Next Action Required should be updated regularly as you make progress so you can quickly jump in and take meaningful actions without having to reassess your position every time you open the plan. This is a simple but very powerful method.
    • To view your initiatives in customizable ways, you can use the drop-down menu on any column header to sort your initiatives (i.e. by due date, completed status, area for development). This allows you to quickly and easily see a variety of perspectives on your progress and enables you to bring upcoming or incomplete projects right to the top.
    Area for Development Item for Development Next Action Required Key Stakeholders/ Owners Target Outcome Due Date Completed
    Core Competencies:
    Communication
    Executive
    communication
    Take economics course to learn business language Course completed [Insert date] [Y/N]
    Core Competencies:
    Communication
    Improve stakeholder
    relationships
    Email Bryce from finance to arrange lunch Improved relationship with finance department [Insert date] [Y/N]
    Technology Maturity: Security Prevention Identity and access management (IAM) system Call Info-Tech to arrange call on IAM solutions 90% of employees entered into IAM system [Insert date] [Y/N]
    Process Maturity: Response & Recovery Disaster recovery Read Info-Tech blueprint on disaster recovery Disaster recovery and backup policies in place [Insert date] [Y/N]

    Step 4.2

    Regularly reassess to track development and progress

    Activities

    Create a calendar event for you and your CISO, including which items you will reassess and when

    This step involves the following participants:

    • CEO or other executive seeking to hire/develop a CISO
    • The newly hired CISO

    or

    • Current CISO seeking to upgrade capabilities

    Outcomes of this step

    Scheduled reassessment of the CISO’s competencies

    Execute

    4.2 Regularly evaluate your CISO’s progress

    < 1 day

    As previously mentioned, your CISO development plan is meant to be a living document. Your CISO will use this as a companion tool throughout project implementation, but periodically it will be necessary to re-evaluate the entire program to assess your progress and ensure that your actions are still in alignment with personal and organizational goals.

    Info-Tech recommends performing the following assessments quarterly or twice yearly with the help of our executive advisors (either over the phone or onsite).

    1. Sit down and re-evaluate your CISO core competencies using the CISO Core Competency Evaluation Tool.
    2. Analyze your relationships using the CISO Stakeholder Power Map Template.
    3. Compare all of these against your previous results to see what areas you have strengthened and decide if you need to focus on a different area now.
    4. Consider your CISO Development Plan Template and decide whether you have achieved your desired outcomes. If not, why?
    5. Schedule your next reassessment, then create a new plan for the upcoming quarter and get started.
    Materials
    • Laptop
    • CISO Development Plan Template
    Participants
    • CISO
    • Hiring executive (possibly)
    Output
    • Complete CISO and security program development plan

    Summary of Accomplishment

    Knowledge Gained

    • Understanding of the competencies contributing to a successful CISO
    • Strategic approach to integrate the CISO into the organization
    • View of various CISO functions from a variety of business and executive perspectives, rather than just a security view

    Process Optimized

    • Hiring of the CISO
    • Assessment and development of stakeholder relationships for the CISO
    • Broad planning for CISO development

    Deliverables Completed

    • IT Security Business Satisfaction and Alignment Diagnostic
    • CISO Core Competency Evaluation Tool
    • CISO Stakeholder Power Map Template
    • CISO Stakeholder Management Strategy Template
    • CISO Development Plan Template

    If you would like additional support, have our analysts guide you through an Info-Tech workshop or Guided Implementation

    Contact your account representative for more information

    workshop@infotech.com
    1-888-670-8889

    Related Info-Tech Research

    Build an Information Security Strategy
    Your security strategy should not be based on trying to blindly follow best practices but on a holistic risk-based assessment that is risk aware and aligns with your business context.

    The First 100 Days as CISO
    Every CISO needs to follow Info-Tech’s five-step approach to truly succeed in their new position. The meaning and expectations of a CISO role will differ from organization to organization and person to person, but the approach to the new position will be relatively the same.

    Implement a Security Governance and Management Program
    Business and security goals should be the same. Businesses cannot operate without security, and security's goal is to enable safe business operations.

    Research Contributors

    • Mark Lester, Information Security Manager, South Carolina State Ports Authority
    • Kyle Kennedy, CISO, CyberSN.com
    • James Miller, Information Security Director, Xavier University
    • Elliot Lewis, Vice President Security & Risk, Info-Tech Research Group
    • Andrew Maroun, Enterprise Security Lead, State of California
    • Brian Bobo, VP Enterprise Security, Schneider National
    • Candy Alexander, GRC Security Consultant, Towerall Inc.
    • Chad Fulgham, Chairman, PerCredo
    • Ian Parker, Head of Corporate Systems Information Security Risk and Compliance, Fujitsu EMEIA
    • Diane Kelly, Information Security Manager, Colorado State Judicial Branch
    • Jeffrey Gardiner, CISO, Western University
    • Joey LaCour, VP & Chief Security, Colonial Savings
    • Karla Thomas, Director IT Global Security, Tower Automotive
    • Kevin Warner, Security and Compliance Officer, Bridge Healthcare Providers
    • Lisa Davis, CEO, Vicinage
    • Luis Brown, Information Security & Compliance Officer, Central New Mexico Community College
    • Peter Clay, CISO, Qlik
    • Robert Banniza, Senior Director IT Center Security, AMSURG
    • Tim Tyndall, Systems Architect, Oregon State

    Bibliography

    Dicker, William. "An Examination of the Role of vCISO in SMBs: An Information Security Governance Exploration." Dissertation, Georgia State University, May 2, 2021. Accessed 30 Sep. 2022.

    Heidrick & Struggles. "2022 Global Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) Survey" Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc. September 6, 2022. Accessed 30 Sep. 2022.

    IBM Security. "Cost of a Data Breach Report 2022" IBM. August 1, 2022. Accessed 9 Nov. 2022.

    Mehta, Medha. "What Is a vCISO? Are vCISO Services Worth It?" Infosec Insights by Sectigo, June 23, 2021. Accessed Nov 22. 2022.

    Milica, Lucia. “Proofpoint 2022 Voice of the CISO Report” Proofpoint. May 2022. Accessed 6 Oct. 2022.

    Navisite. "The State of Cybersecurity Leadership and Readiness" Navisite. November 9, 2021. Accessed 9 Nov. 2022.

    Shayo, Conrad, and Frank Lin. “An Exploration of the Evolving Reporting Organizational Structure for the Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) Function” Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology, vol. 7, no. 1, June 2019. Accessed 28 Sep. 2022.

    Create a Buyer Persona and Journey

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}558|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Marketing Solutions
    • Parent Category Link: /marketing-solutions
    • Contacts fail to convert to leads because messaging fails to resonate with buyers.
    • Products fail to reach targets given shallow understanding of buyer needs.
    • Sellers' emails go unopened and attempts at discovery fail due to no understanding of buyer challenges, pain points, and needs.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Marketing leaders in possession of well-researched and up-to-date buyer personas and journeys dramatically improve product market fit, lead gen, and sales results.
    • Success starts with product, marketing, and sales alignment on targeted personas.
    • Speed to deploy is enabled via initial buyer persona attribute discovery internally.
    • However, ultimate success requires buyer interviews, especially for the buyer journey.
    • Leading marketers update journey maps every six months as disruptive events such as COVID-19 and new media and tech platform advancements require continual innovation.

    Impact and Result

    • Reduce time and treasure wasted chasing the wrong prospects.
    • Improve product-market fit.
    • Increase open and click-through rates in your lead gen engine.
    • Perform more effective sales discovery and increase eventual win rates.

    Create a Buyer Persona and Journey Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Our Executive Brief summarizes the challenges faced when buyer persona and journeys are ill-defined. It describes the attributes of, and the benefits that accrue from, a well-defined persona and journey and the key steps to take to achieve success.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Drive an aligned initial draft of buyer persona

    Define and align your team on target persona, outline steps to capture and document a robust buyer persona and journey, and capture current team buyer knowledge.

    • Buyer Persona Creation Template
    • Buyer Persona and Journey Interview Guide and Data Capture Tool

    2. Interview buyers and validate persona and journey

    Hold initial buyer interviews, test initial results, and continue with interviews.

    3. Prepare communications and educate stakeholders

    Consolidate interview findings, present to product, marketing, and sales teams. Work with them to apply to product design, marketing launch/campaigning, and sales and customer success enablement.

    • Buyer Persona and Journey Summary Template
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Create a Buyer Persona and Journey

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Align Team, Identify Persona, and Document Current Knowledge

    The Purpose

    Organize, drive alignment on target persona, and capture initial views.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Steering committee and project team roles and responsibilities clarified.

    Product, marketing, and sales aligned on target persona.

    Build initial team understanding of persona.

    Activities

    1.1 Outline a vision for buyer persona and journey creation and identify stakeholders.

    1.2 Identify buyer persona choices and settle on an initial target.

    1.3 Document team knowledge about buyer persona (and journey where possible).

    Outputs

    Documented steering committee and working team

    Executive Brief on personas and journey

    Personas and initial targets

    Documented team knowledge

    2 Validate Initial Work and Identify Buyer Interviewees

    The Purpose

    Build list of buyer interviewees, finalize interview guide, and validate current findings with analyst input.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Interview efficiently using 75-question interview guide.

    Gain analyst help in persona validation, reducing workload.

    Activities

    2.1 Share initial insights with covering industry analyst.

    2.2 Hear from industry analyst their perspectives on the buyer persona attributes.

    2.3 Reconcile differences; update “current understanding.”

    2.4 Identify interviewee types by segment, region, etc.

    Outputs

    Analyst-validated initial findings

    Target interviewee types

    3 Schedule and Hold Buyer Interviews

    The Purpose

    Validate current persona hypothesis and flush out those attributes only derived from interviews.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Get to a critical mass of persona and journey understanding quickly.

    Activities

    3.1 Identify actual list of 15-20 interviewees.

    3.2 Hold interviews and use interview guides over the course of weeks.

    3.3 Hold review session after initial 3-4 interviews to make adjustments.

    3.4 Complete interviews.

    Outputs

    List of interviewees; calls scheduled

    Initial review – “are you going in the right direction?”

    Completed interviews

    4 Summarize Findings and Provide Actionable Guidance to Colleagues

    The Purpose

    Summarize persona and journey attributes and provide activation guidance to team.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Understanding of product market fit requirements, messaging, and marketing, and sales asset content.

    Activities

    4.1 Summarize findings.

    4.2 Create action items for supporting team, e.g. messaging, touch points, media spend, assets.

    4.3 Convene steering committee/executives and working team for final review.

    4.4 Schedule meetings with colleagues to action results.

    Outputs

    Complete findings

    Action items for team members

    Plan for activation

    5 Measure Impact and Results

    The Purpose

    Measure results, adjust, and improve.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Activation of outcomes; measured results.

    Activities

    5.1 Review final copy, assets, launch/campaign plans, etc.

    5.2 Develop/review implementation plan.

    5.3 Reconvene team to review results.

    Outputs

    Activation review

    List of suggested next steps

    Further reading

    Create a Buyer Persona and Journey

    Make it easier to market, sell, and achieve product-market fit with deeper buyer understanding.

    EXECUTIVE BRIEF

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    B2B marketers without documented personas and journeys often experience the following:

    • Contacts fail to convert to leads because messaging fails to resonate with buyers.
    • Products fail to reach targets given shallow understanding of buyer needs.
    • Sellers’ emails go unopened, and attempts at discovery fail due to no understanding of buyer challenges, pain points, and needs.

    Without a deeper understanding of buyer needs and how they buy, B2B marketers will waste time and precious resources targeting the incorrect personas.

    Common Obstacles

    Despite being critical elements, organizations struggle to build personas due to:

    • A lack of alignment and collaboration among marketing, product, and sales.
    • An internal focus; or a lack of true customer centricity.
    • A lack of tools and techniques for building personas and buyer journeys.

    In today’s Agile development environment, combined with the pressure to generate revenues quickly, high tech marketers often skip the steps necessary to go deeper to build buyer understanding.

    SoftwareReviews’ Approach

    With a common framework and target output, clients will:

    • Align marketing, sales, and product, and collaborate together to share current knowledge on buyer personas and journeys.
    • Target 12-15 customers and prospects to interview and validate insights. Share that with customer-facing staff.
    • Activate the insights for more customer-centric lead generation, product development, and selling.

    Clients who activate findings from buyer personas and journeys will see a 50% results improvement.

    SoftwareReviews Insight:
    Buyer personas and buyer journeys are essential ingredients in go-to-market success, as they inform for product, marketing, sales, and customer success who we are targeting and how to engage with them successfully.

    Buyer personas and journeys: A go-to-market critical success factor

    Marketers – large and small – will fail to optimize product-market fit, lead generation, and sales effectiveness without well-defined buyer personas and a buyer journey.

    Critical Success Factors of a Successful G2M Strategy:

    • Opportunity size and business case
    • Buyer personas and journey
    • Competitively differentiated product hypothesis
    • Buyer-validated commercial concept
    • Sales revenue plan and program cost budget
    • Consolidated communications to steering committee

    Jeff Golterman, Managing Director, SoftwareReviews Advisory

    “44% of B2B marketers have already discovered the power of Personas.”
    – Hasse Jansen, Boardview.io!, 2016

    Documenting buyer personas enables success beyond marketing

    Documenting buyer personas has several essential benefits to marketing, sales, and product teams:

    • Achieve a better understanding of your target buyer – by building a detailed buyer persona for each type of buyer and keeping it fresh, you take a giant step toward becoming a customer-centric organization.
    • Team alignment on a common definition – will happen when you build buyer personas collaboratively and among those teams that touch the customer.
    • Improved lead generation – increases dramatically when messaging and marketing assets across your lead generation engine better resonate with buyers because you have taken the time to understand them deeply.
    • More effective selling – is possible when sellers apply persona development output to their interactions with prospects and customers.
    • Better product-market fit – increases when product teams more deeply understand for whom they are designing products. Documenting buyer challenges, pain points, and unmet needs gives product teams what they need to optimize product adoption.

    “It’s easier buying gifts for your best friend or partner than it is for a stranger, right? You know their likes and dislikes, you know the kind of gifts they’ll have use for, or the kinds of gifts they’ll get a kick out of. Customer personas work the same way, by knowing what your customer wants and needs, you can present them with content targeted specifically to their wants and needs.”
    – Emma Bilardi, Product Marketing Alliance, 2020

    Buyer understanding activates just about everything

    Without the deep buyer insights that persona and journey capture enables, marketers are suboptimized.

    Buyer Persona and Journey

    • Product design
    • Customer targeting
    • Personalization
    • Messaging
    • Content marketing
    • Lead gen & scoring
    • Sales Effectiveness
    • Customer retention

    “Marketing eutopia is striking the all-critical sweet spot that adds real value and makes customers feel recognized and appreciated, while not going so far as to appear ‘big brother’. To do this, you need a deep understanding of your audience coming from a range of different data sets and the capability to extract meaning.”
    – Plexure, 2020

    Does your organization need buyer persona and journey updating?

    “Yes,” if experiencing one or more key challenges:

    • Sales time is wasted on unqualified leads
    • Website abandon rates are high
    • Lead gen engine click-through rates are low
    • Ideal customer profile is ill defined
    • Marketing asset downloads are low
    • Seller discovery with prospects is ineffective
    • Sales win/loss rates drop due to poor product-market fit
    • Higher than desired customer churn

    SoftwareReviews Advisory Insight:
    Marketers developing buyer personas and journeys that lack agreement among Marketing, Sales, and Product of personas to target will squander precious time and resources throughout the customer targeting and acquisition process.

    Outcomes and benefits

    Building your buyer persona and journey using our methodology will enable:

    • Greater stakeholder alignment – when marketing, product, and sales agree on personas, less time is wasted on targeting alternate personas.
    • Improved product-market fit – when buyers see both pain-relieving features and value-based pricing, “because you asked vs. guessed,” win rates increase.
    • Greater open and click-through rates – because you understood buyer pain points and motivations for solution seeking, you’ll see higher visits and engagement with your lead gen engine, and because you asked “what asset types do you find most helpful” your CTAs become ”lead-gen magnets” because you’ve offered the right asset types in your content marketing strategy.
    • More qualified leads – because you defined a more accurate ideal customer profile (ICP) and your lead scoring algorithm has improved, sellers see more qualified leads.
    • Increased sales cycle velocity – since you learned from personas their content and engagement preferences and what collateral types they need during the down-funnel sales discussions, sales calls are more productive and sales cycles shrink.

    Our methodology for buyer persona and journey creation

    1. Document Team Knowledge of Buyer Persona and Drive Alignment 2. Interview Target Buyer Prospects and Customers 3. Create Outputs and Apply to Marketing, Sales, and Product
    Phase Steps
    1. Outline a vision for buyer persona and journey creation and identify stakeholders.
    2. Pull stakeholders together, identify initial buyer persona, and begin to document team knowledge about buyer persona (and journey where possible).
    3. Validate with industry and marketing analyst’s initial buyer persona, and identify list of buyer interviewees.
    1. Hold interviews and document and share findings.
    2. Validate initial drafts of buyer persona and create initial documented buyer journey. Review findings among key stakeholders, steering committee, and supporting analysts.
    3. Complete remaining interviews.
    1. Summarize findings.
    2. Convene steering committee/exec. and working team for final review.
    3. Communicate to key stakeholders in product, marketing, sales, and customer success for activation.
    Phase Outcomes
    1. Steering committee and team selection
    2. Team insights about buyer persona documented
    3. Buyer persona validation with industry and marketing analysts
    4. Sales, marketing, and product alignment
    1. Interview guide
    2. Target interviewee list
    3. Buyer-validated buyer persona
    4. Buyer journey documented with asset types, channels, and “how buyers buy” fully documented
    1. Education deck on buyer persona and journey ready for use with all stakeholders: product, field marketing, sales, executives, customer success, partners
    2. Activation will update product-market fit, optimize lead gen, and improve sales effectiveness

    Our approach provides interview guides and templates to help rebuild buyer persona

    Our methodology will enable you to align your team on why it’s important to capture the most important attributes of buyer persona including:

    • Functional – helps you find and locate your target personas
    • Emotive – deepens team understanding of buyer initiatives, motivations for seeking alternatives, challenges they face, pain points for your offerings to address, and terminology that describes the “space”
    • Solution – enables greater product market fit
    • Behavioral – clarifies how to communicate with personas and understand their content preferences
    Functional – “to find them”
    Job Role Title Org. Chart Dynamics Buying Center Firmographics
    Emotive – “what they do and jobs to be done”
    Initiatives: What programs/projects the persona is tasked with and their feelings and aspirations about these initiatives. Motivations? Build credibility? Get promoted? Challenges: Identify the business issues, problems, and pain points that impede attainment of objectives. What are their fears, uncertainties, and doubts about these challenges? Buyer Need: They may have multiple needs; which need is most likely met with the offering? Terminology: What are the keywords/phrases they organically use to discuss the buyer need or business issue?
    Decision Criteria – “how they decide”
    Buyer Role: List decision-making criteria and power level. The five common buyer roles are champion, influencer, decision maker, user, and ratifier (purchaser/negotiator). Evaluation and Decision Criteria: Which lens – strategic, financial, or operational – does the persona evaluate the impact of purchase through?
    Solution Attributes – “what does the ideal solution look like”
    Steps in “Jobs to Be Done” Elements of the “Ideal Solution” Business outcomes from ideal solution Opportunity scope; other potential users Acceptable price for value delivered Alternatives that see consideration Solution sourcing: channel, where to buy
    Behavioral Attributes – “how to approach them successfully”
    Content Preferences: List the persona’s content preferences – blog, infographic, demo, video – vs. long-form assets (e.g. white paper, presentation, analyst report). Interaction Preferences: Which are preferred among in-person meetings, phone calls, emails, videoconferencing, conducting research via Web, mobile, and social? Watering Holes: Which physical or virtual places do they go to network or exchange info with peers (e.g. LinkedIn)?

    Buyer journeys are constantly shifting

    If you didn’t remap buyer journeys in 2021, you may be losing to competitors that did. Leaders remap buyer journey frequently.

    • The multi-channel buyer journey is constantly changing. Today’s B2B buyer uses industry research sites, vendor content marketing assets, software reviews sites, contacts with vendor salespeople, events participation, peer networking, consultants, emails, social media sites, and electronic media to research purchasing decisions.
    • COVID-19 has dramatically decreased face-to-face interaction. We estimate a B2B buyer spent 20-25% more time online in 2021 than pre-COVID-19 researching software buying decisions. This has diminished the importance of face-to-face selling and given dramatic rise to digital selling and outbound marketing.
    • Content marketing has exploded, but without mapping the buyer journey and knowing where – by channel –and when – by buyer journey step – to offer content marketing assets, we will fail to convert prospects into buyers.

    “~2/3 of [B2B] buyers prefer remote human interactions or digital self-service.” And during Aug. ‘20 to Feb. ‘21, use of digital self-service to interact with sales reps leapt by more than 10% for both researching and evaluating new suppliers.”
    – Liz Harrison, Dennis Spillecke, Jennifer Stanley, and Jenny Tsai McKinsey & Company, 2021

    SoftwareReviews Advisory Insight:
    Marketers are advised to update their buyer journey annually and with greater frequency when the human vs. digital mix is affected due to events such as COVID-19 and as emerging media such as AR shifts asset-type usage and engagement options.

    Our approach helps you define the buyer journey

    Because marketing leaders need to reach buyers through the right channel with the right message at the right time during their decision cycle, you’ll benefit by using questionnaires that enable you to build the below easily and quickly.

    You’ll be more successful by following our overall guidance

    Overarching insight

    Buyer personas and buyer journeys are essential ingredients in go-to-market success, as they inform for product, marketing, sales, and customer success who we are targeting and how to engage with them successfully.

    Align Your Team

    Marketers developing buyer personas and journeys that lack agreement among Marketing, Sales, and Product of personas to target will squander precious time and resources throughout the customer targeting and acquisition process.

    Jump-Start Persona Development

    Marketing leaders leverage the buyer persona knowledge not only from in-house experts in areas such as sales and executives but from analysts that speak with their buyers each and every day.

    Buyer Interviews Are a Must

    While leaders will get a fast start by interviewing sellers, executives, and analysts, you will fail to craft the right messages, build the right marketing assets, and design the best buyer journey if you skip buyer interviews.

    Watch for Disruption

    Leaders will update their buyer journey annually and with greater frequency when the human vs. digital mix is effected due to events such as COVID-19 and as emerging media such as AR and VR shifts the way buyers engage.

    Advanced Buyer Journey Discovery

    Digital marketers that ramp up lead gen engine capabilities to capture “wins” and measure engagement back through the lead gen and nurturing engines will build a more data-driven view of the buyer journey. Target to build this advanced capability in your initial design.

    Tools and templates to speed your success

    This blueprint is accompanied by supporting deliverables to help you gather team insights, interview customers and prospects, and summarize results for ease in communications.

    To support your buyer persona and journey creation, we’ve created the enclosed tools

    Buyer Persona Creation Template

    A PowerPoint template to aid the capture and summarizing of your team’s insights on the buyer persona.

    Buyer Persona and Journey Interview Guide and Data Capture Tool

    For interviewing customers and prospects, this tool is designed to help you interview personas and summarize results for up to 15 interviewees.

    Buyer Persona and Journey Summary Template

    A PowerPoint template into which you can drop your buyer persona and journey interviewees list and summary findings.

    SoftwareReviews offers two levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    "Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful."

    The "do-it-yourself" step-by-step instructions begin with Phase 1.

    Guided Implementation

    "Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track."

    A Guided Implementation is a series of analysts inquiries with you and your team.

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks are used throughout each option.

    Guided Implementation

    A Guided Implementation (GI) is series of calls with a SoftwareReviews Advisory analyst to help implement our best practices in your organization.

    For guidance on marketing applications, we can arrange a discussion with an Info-Tech analyst.

    Your engagement managers will work with you to schedule analyst calls.

    What does our GI on buyer persona and journey mapping look like?

    Drive an Aligned Initial Draft of Buyer Persona

    • Call #1: Collaborate on vision for buyer persona and the buyer journey. Review templates and sample outputs. Identify your team.
    • Call #2: Review work in progress on capturing working team knowledge of buyer persona elements.
    • Call #3: (Optional) Review Info-Tech’s research-sourced persona insights.
    • Call #4: Validate the persona WIP with Info-Tech analysts. Review buyer interview approach and target list.

    Interview Buyers and Validate Persona and Journey

    • Call #5: Revise/review interview guide and final interviewee list; schedule interviews.
    • Call #6: Review interim interview finds; adjust interview guide.
    • Call #7: Use interview findings to validate/update persona and build journey map.
    • Call #8: Add supporting analysts to final stakeholder review.

    Prepare Communications and Educate Stakeholders

    • Call #9: Review output templates completed with final persona and journey findings.
    • Call #10: Add supporting analysts to stakeholder education meetings for support and help with addressing questions/issues.

    Workshop overview

    Contact your account representative for more information. workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8889

    Day1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5
    Align Team, Identify Persona, and Document Current Knowledge Validate Initial Work and Identify Buyer Interviewees Schedule and Hold Buyer interviews Summarize Findings and Provide Actionable Guidance to Colleagues Measure Impact and Results
    Activities

    1.1 Outline a vision for buyer persona and journey creation and identify stakeholders.

    1.2 Identify buyer persona choices and settle on an initial target.

    1.3 Document team knowledge about buyer persona (and journey where possible).

    2.1 Share initial insights with covering industry analyst.

    2.2 Hear from industry analyst their perspectives on the buyer persona attributes.

    2.3 Reconcile differences; update “current understanding.”

    2.4 Identify interviewee types by segment, region, etc.

    3.1 Identify actual list of 15-20 interviewees.

    A gap of up to a week for scheduling of interviews.

    3.2 Hold interviews and use interview guides (over the course of weeks).

    3.3 Hold review session after initial 3-4 interviews to make adjustments.

    3.4 Complete interviews.

    4.1 Summarize findings.

    4.2 Create action items for supporting team, e.g. messaging, touch points, media spend, assets.

    4.3 Convene steering committee/exec. and working team for final review.

    4.4 Schedule meetings with colleagues to action results.

    5.1 Review final copy, assets, launch/campaign plans, etc.

    5.2 Develop/review implementation plan.

    A period of weeks will likely intervene to execute and gather results.

    5.3 Reconvene team to review results.

    Deliverables
    1. Documented steering committee and working team
    2. Executive Brief on personas and journey
    3. Personas and initial targets
    4. Documented team knowledge
    1. Analyst-validated initial findings
    2. Target interviewee types
    1. List of interviewees; calls scheduled
    2. Initial review – “are we going in the right direction?”
    3. Completed interviews
    1. Complete findings
    2. Action items for team members
    3. Plan for activation
    1. Activation review
    2. List of suggested next steps

    Phase 1
    Drive an Aligned Initial Draft of Buyer Persona

    This Phase walks you through the following activities:

    • Develop an understanding of what comprises a buyer persona and journey, including their importance to overall go-to-market strategy and execution.
    • Sample outputs.

    This Phase involves the following stakeholders:

    • Program leadership
    • Product Marketing
    • Product Management
    • Representative(s) from Sales
    • Executive Leadership

    1.1 Establish the team and align on shared vision

    Input

    • Typically a joint recognition that buyer personas have not been fully documented.
    • Identify working team members/participants (see below), and an executive sponsor.

    Output

    • Communication of team members involved and the make-up of steering committee and working team
    • Alignment of team members on a shared vision of “Why Build Buyer Personas and Journey” and what key attributes define both.

    Materials

    • N/A

    Participants

    • Initiative Manager – individual leading the buyer persona and journey initiative
    • CMO/Sponsoring Executive Working Team – typically representatives in Product Marketing, Product Management, and Sales
    • SoftwareReviews marketing analyst

    60 minutes

    1. Schedule inquiry with working team members and walk the team through the Buyer Persona and Journey Executive Brief PowerPoint presentation.
    2. Optional: Have the (SoftwareReviews Advisory) SRA analyst walk the team through the Buyer Persona and Journey Executive Brief PowerPoint presentation as part of your session.

    Review the Create a Buyer Persona Executive Brief (Slides 3-14)

    1.2 Document team knowledge of buyer persona

    Input

    • Working team member knowledge

    Output

    • Initial draft of your buyer persona

    Materials

    • Buyer Persona Creation Template

    Participants

    • Initiative Manager – individual leading the buyer persona and journey initiative
    • CMO/Sponsoring Executive (optional)
    • Working Team – typically representatives in Product Marketing, Product Management, and Sales

    2-3 sessions of 60 minutes each

    1. Schedule meeting with working team members and, using the Buyer Persona Template, lead the team in a discussion that documents current team knowledge of the target buyer persona.
    2. Lead the team to prioritize an initial, single, most important persona and to collaborate to complete the template (and later, the buyer journey). Once the team learns the process for working on the initial persona, the development of additional personas will become more efficient.
    3. Place the PowerPoint template in a shared drive for team collaboration. Expect to schedule several 60-minute meets. Quicken collaboration by encouraging team to “do their homework” by sharing persona knowledge within the shared drive version of the template. Your goal is to get to an initial agreed upon version that can be shared for additional validation with industry analyst(s) in the next step.

    Download the Buyer Persona Creation Template

    1.3 Validate with industry analysts

    Input

    • Identify gaps in persona from previous steps

    Output

    • Further validated buyer persona

    Materials

    • Bring your Buyer Persona Creation Template to the meeting to share with analysts

    Participants

    • Initiative Manager – individual leading the buyer persona and journey initiative
    • CMO/Sponsoring Executive (Optional)
    • Working Team – typically representatives in Product Marketing, Product Management, and Sales
    • Info-Tech analyst covering your product category and SoftwareReviews marketing analyst

    30 minutes

    1. Schedule meeting with working team members and discuss which persona areas require further validation from an Info-Tech analyst who has worked closely with those buyers within your persona.

    60 minutes

    1. Schedule an inquiry with the appropriate Info-Tech analyst and SoftwareReviews Advisory analyst to share current findings and see:
      1. Info-Tech analyst provide content feedback given what they know about your target persona and product category.
      2. SoftwareReviews Advisory analyst provide feedback on persona approach and to coach any gaps or important omissions.
    2. Tabulate results and update your persona summary. At this point you will likely require additional validation through interviews with customers and prospects.

    1.4 Identify interviewees and prepare for interviews

    Input

    • Identify segments within which you require persona knowledge
    • Understand your persona insight gaps

    Output

    • List of interviewees

    Materials

    • Interviewee recording template on following slide
    • Interview guide questions found within the Buyer Persona and Journey Interview Guide and data Capture Tool

    Participants

    • Initiative Manager – individual leading the buyer persona and journey initiative
    • Working Team – typically representatives in Product Marketing, Product Management, and Sales

    1-2 weeks

    1. Identify the types of customers and prospects that will best represent your target persona. Choose interviewees that when interviewed will inform key differences among key segments (geographies, company size, mix of customers and prospects, etc.).
    2. Recruit interviewees and schedule interviews for 45 minutes.
    3. Keep track of Interviewees using the slide following this one.
    4. In preparation for interviews, review the Buyer Persona and Journey Interview Guide and Data Capture Tool. Review the two sets of questions:
      1. Buyer Persona-Related – use to validate areas where you still have gaps in your persona, OR if you are starting with a blank persona and wish to build your personas entirely based on customer and prospect interviews.
      2. Buyer-Journey Related, which we will focus on in the next phase.

    Download the Buyer Persona and Journey Interview Guide and Data Capture Tool

    The image shows a table titled ‘Interviewee List.’ A note next to the title indicates: Here you will document your interviewee list and outreach plan. A note in the Segment column indicates: Ensure you are interviewing personas across segments that will give you the insights you need, e.g. by size, by region, mix of customers and prospects. A note in the Title column reads: Vary your title types up or down in the “buying center” if you are seeking to strengthen buying center dynamics understanding. A note in the Roles column reads: Vary your role types according to decision-making roles (decision maker, influencer, ratifier, coach, user) if you are seeking to strengthen decision-making dynamics understanding.

    Phase 2
    Interview Buyers and Validate Persona and Journey

    This Phase walks you through the following activities:

    • Developing final interview guide.
    • Interviewing buyers and customers.
    • Adjusting approach.
    • Validating buyer persona.
    • Crafting buyer journey
    • Gaining analyst feedback.

    This Phase involves the following stakeholders:

    • Program leadership
    • Product Marketing
    • Representative(s) from Sales

    2.1 Hold interviews

    Input

    • List of interviewees
    • Final list of questions

    Output

    • Buyer perspectives on their personas and buyer journeys

    Materials

    • Buyer Persona and Journey Interview Guide and data Capture Tool

    Participants

    • Initiative Manager – individual leading the buyer persona and journey initiative
    • Working Team – typically representatives in Product Marketing, Product Management, and Sales

    1-2 weeks

    1. Hold interviews and adjust your interviewing approach as you go along. Uncover where you are not getting the right answers, check with working team and analysts, and adjust.

    Download the Buyer Persona and Journey Interview Guide and Data Capture Tool

    2.2 Use interview findings to validate what’s needed for activation

    Input

    • List of interviewees
    • Final list of questions

    Output

    • Buyer perspectives on their personas and buyer journeys
    • Stakeholder feedback that actionable insights are resulting from interviews

    Materials

    • Buyer Persona Creation Template
    • Buyer Persona and Journey Interview Guide and Data Capture Tool

    Participants

    • Initiative Manager – individual leading the buyer persona and journey initiative
    • Working Team – typically representatives in Product Marketing, Product Management, and Sales
    • SoftwareReviews marketing analyst

    2 hours

    1. Convene your team, with marketing analysts, and test early findings: It’s wise to test initial interview results to check that you are getting the right insights to understand and validate key challenges, pain points, needs, and other vital areas pertaining to the buyer persona. Are the answers you are getting enabling you to complete the Summary slides for later communications and training for Sales?
    2. Check when doing buyer journey interviews that you are getting actionable answers that drive messaging, what asset types are needed, what the marketing channel mix is, and other vital insights to activate the results. Are the answers you are getting adequate to give guidance to campaigners, content marketers, and sales enablement?
    3. See the following slides for detailed questions that need to be answered satisfactorily by your team members that need to “activate” the results.

    Download the Buyer Persona and Journey Interview Guide and Data Capture Tool

    2.2.1 Are you getting what you need from interviews to inform the buyer persona?

    Test that you are on the right track:

    1. Are you getting the functional answers so you can guide sellers to the right roles? Can you guide marketers/campaigners to the right “Ideal Customer Profile” for lead scoring?
    2. Are you capturing the right emotive areas that will support message crafting? Solutioning? SEM/SEO?
    3. Are you capturing insights into “how they decide” so sellers are well informed on the decision-making dynamics?
    4. Are you getting a strong understanding of content, interaction preferences, and news and information sources so sellers can outreach more effectively, you can pinpoint media spend, and content marketing can create the right assets?
    Functional – “to find them”
    Job Role Title Org. Chart Dynamics Buying Center Firmographics
    Emotive – “what they do and jobs to be done”
    Initiatives: What programs/projects the persona is tasked with and their feelings and aspirations about these initiatives. Motivations? Build credibility? Get promoted? Challenges: Identify the business issues, problems, and pain points that impede attainment of objectives. What are their fears, uncertainties, and doubts about these challenges? Buyer Need: They may have multiple needs; which need is most likely met with the offering? Terminology: What are the keywords/phrases they organically use to discuss the buyer need or business issue?
    Decision Criteria – “how they decide”
    Buyer Role: List decision-making criteria and power level. The five common buyer roles are champion, influencer, decision maker, user, and ratifier (purchaser/negotiator). Evaluation and Decision Criteria: Which lens – strategic, financial, or operational – does the persona evaluate the impact of purchase through?
    Solution Attributes – “what does the ideal solution look like”
    Steps in “Jobs to Be Done” Elements of the “Ideal Solution” Business outcomes from ideal solution Opportunity scope; other potential users Acceptable price for value delivered Alternatives that see consideration Solution sourcing: channel, where to buy
    Behavioral Attributes – “how to approach them successfully”
    Content Preferences: List the persona’s content preferences – blog, infographic, demo, video – vs. long-form assets (e.g. white paper, presentation, analyst report). Interaction Preferences: Which are preferred among in-person meetings, phone calls, emails, videoconferencing, conducting research via Web, mobile, and social? Watering Holes: Which physical or virtual places do they go to network or exchange info with peers (e.g. LinkedIn)?

    2.2.2 Are you getting what you need from interviews to support the buyer journey?

    Our approach helps you define the buyer journey

    Because marketing leaders need to reach buyers through the right channel with the right message at the right time during their decision cycle, you’ll benefit by using questionnaires that enable you to build the below easily and quickly.

    2.3 Continue interviews

    Input

    • Final adjustments to list of interview questions

    Output

    • Final buyer perspectives on their personas and buyer journeys

    Materials

    • Buyer Persona Creation Template
    • Buyer Persona and Journey Interview Guide and data Capture Tool

    Participants

    • Initiative Manager – individual leading the buyer persona and journey initiative
    • Working Team – typically representatives in Product Marketing, Product Management, and Sales

    1-2 weeks

    1. Continue customer and prospect interviews.
    2. Ensure you are gaining the segment perspectives needed.
    3. Complete the “Summary” columns within the Buyer Persona and Journey Interview Guide and Data Capture Tool.

    Download the Buyer Persona and Journey Interview Guide and Data Capture Tool

    Phase 3
    Prepare Communications and Educate Stakeholders

    This Phase walks you through the following activities:

    • Creating outputs for key stakeholders
    • Communicating final findings and supporting marketing, sales, and product activation.

    This Phase involves the following stakeholders:

    • Program leadership
    • Product Marketing
    • Product Management
    • Sales
    • Field Marketing/Campaign Management
    • Executive Leadership

    3.1 Summarize interview results and convene full working team and steering committee for final review

    Input

    • Buyer persona and journey interviews detail

    Output

    • Buyer perspectives on their personas and buyer journeys

    Materials

    • Buyer Persona and Journey Interview Guide and Data Capture Tool
    • Buyer Persona and Journey Summary Template

    Participants

    • Initiative Manager – individual leading the buyer persona and journey initiative
    • CMO/Sponsoring Executive (Optional)
    • Working Team – typically representatives in Product Marketing, Product Management, and Sales
    • SoftwareReviews marketing analyst

    1-2 hours

    1. Summarize interview results within the Buyer Persona and Journey Summary Template.

    Download the Buyer Persona and Journey Interview Guide and Data Capture Tool

    Download the Buyer Persona and Journey Summary Template

    3.2 Convene executive steering committee and working team to review results

    Input

    • Buyer persona and journey interviews summary

    Output

    • Buyer perspectives on their personas and buyer journeys

    Materials

    • Buyer Persona and Journey Summary Template

    Participants

    • Initiative Manager – individual leading the buyer persona and journey initiative
    • Working Team – typically representatives in Product Marketing, Product Management, and Sales

    1-2 hours

    1. Present final persona and journey results to the steering committee/executives and to working group using the summary slides interview results within the Buyer Persona and Journey Summary Template to finalize results.

    Download the Buyer Persona and Journey Summary Template

    3.3 Convene stakeholder meetings to activate results

    Input

    • Buyer persona and journey interviews summary

    Output

    Activation of key learnings to drive:

    • Better product –market fit
    • Lead gen
    • Sales effectiveness
    • Awareness

    Materials

    • Buyer Persona and Journey Summary Template

    Participants

    • Initiative Manager – individual leading the buyer persona and journey initiative
    • Working Team – typically representatives in Product Marketing, Product Management, and Sales
    • Stakeholder team members (see left)

    4-5 hours

    Present final persona and journey results to each stakeholder team. Key presentations include:

    1. Product team to validate product market fit.
    2. Content marketing to provide messaging direction for the creation of awareness and lead gen assets.
    3. Campaigners/Field Marketing for campaign-related messaging and to identify asset types required to be designed and delivered to support the buyer journey.
    4. Social media strategists for social post copy, and PR for other awareness-building copy.
    5. Sales enablement/training to enable updating of sales collateral, proposals, and sales training materials. Sellers to help with their targeting, prospecting, and crafting of outbound messaging and talk tracks.

    Download the Buyer Persona and Journey Summary Template

    Summary of Accomplishment

    Problem Solved

    With the help of this blueprint, you have deepened your and your colleagues’ buyer understanding at both the persona “who they are” level and the buyer journey “how do they buy” level. You are among the minority of marketing leaders that have fully documented a buyer persona and journey – congratulations!

    The benefits of having led your team through the process are significant and include the following:

    • Better alignment of customer/buyer-facing teams such as in product, marketing, sales, and customer success.
    • Messaging that can be used by marketing, sales, and social teams that will resonate with buyer initiatives, pain points, sought-after “pain relief,” and value.
    • Places in the digital and physical universe where your prospects “hang out” so you can optimize your media spend.
    • More effective use of marketing assets and sales collateral that align with the way your prospect needs to consume information throughout their buyer journey to make a decision in your solution area.

    And by capturing and documenting your buyer persona and journey even for a single buyer type, you have started to build the “institutional strength” to apply the process to other roles in the decision-making process or for when you go after new and different buyer types for new products. And finally, by bringing your team along with you in this process, you have also led your team in becoming a more customer-focused organization – a strategic shift that all organizations should pursue.

    If you would like additional support, contact us and we’ll make sure you get the professional expertise you need.

    Contact your account representative for more information.

    info@softwarereviews.com

    1-888-670-8889

    Related Software Reviews Research

    Optimize Lead Generation With Lead Scoring

    • Save time and money and improve your sales win rates when you apply our methodology to score contacts with your lead gen engine more accurately and pass better qualified leads over to your sellers.
    • Our methodology teaches marketers to develop your own lead scoring approach based upon lead/contact profile vs. your Ideal Customer Profile (ICP) and scores contact engagement. Applying the methodology to arrive at your own approach to scoring will mean reduced lead gen costs, higher conversion rates, and increased marketing-influenced wins.

    Bibliography

    Bilardi, Emma. “How to Create Buyer Personas.” Product Marketing Alliance, July 2020. Accessed Dec. 2021.

    Harrison, Liz, Dennis Spillecke, Jennifer Stanley, and Jenny Tsai. “Omnichannel in B2B sales: The new normal in a year that has been anything but.” McKinsey & Company, 15 March 2021. Accessed Dec. 2021.

    Jansen, Hasse. “Buyer Personas – 33 Mind Blowing Stats.” Boardview.io!, 19 Feb. 2016. Accessed Jan. 2022.

    Raynor, Lilah. “Understanding The Changing B2B Buyer Journey.” Forbes Agency Council, 18 July 2021. Accessed Dec. 2021.

    Simpson, Jon. “Finding Your Audience: The Importance of Developing a Buyer Persona.” Forbes Agency Council, 16 May 2017. Accessed Dec. 2021.

    “Successfully Executing Personalized Marketing Campaigns at Scale.” Plexure, 6 Jan. 2020. Accessed Dec 2020.

    Ulwick, Anthony W. JOBS TO BE DONE: Theory to Practice. E-book, Strategyn, 1 Jan. 2017. Accessed Jan. 2022.

    Lay the Strategic Foundations of Your Applications Team

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}171|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Architecture & Strategy
    • Parent Category Link: /architecture-and-strategy
    • As an application leader, you are expected to quickly familiarize yourself with the current state of your applications environment.
    • You need to continuously demonstrate effective leadership to your applications team while defining and delivering a strategy for your applications department that will be accepted by stakeholders.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • The applications department can be viewed as the face of IT. The business often portrays the value of IT through the applications and services they provide and support. IT success can be dominantly driven by the application team’s performance.
    • Conflicting perceptions lead to missed opportunities. Being transparent on how well applications are supporting stakeholders from both business and technical perspectives is critical. This attribute helps validate that technical initiatives are addressing the right business problems or exploiting new value opportunities.

    Impact and Result

    • Get to know what needs to be changed quickly. Use Info-Tech’s advice and tools to perform an assessment of your department’s accountabilities and harvest stakeholder input to ensure that your applications operating model and portfolio meets or exceeds expectations and establishes the right solutions to the right problems.
    • Solidify the applications long-term strategy. Adopt best practices to ensure that you are striving towards the right goals and objectives. Not only do you need to clarify both team and stakeholder expectations, but you will ultimately need buy-in from them as you improve the operating model, applications portfolio, governance, and tactical plans. These items will be needed to develop your strategic model and long-term success.
    • Develop an action plan to show movement for improvements. Hit the ground running with an action plan to achieve realistic goals and milestones within an acceptable timeframe. An expectations-driven roadmap will help establish the critical structures that will continue to feed and grow your applications department.

    Lay the Strategic Foundations of Your Applications Team Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should develop an applications strategy, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Get to know your team

    Understand your applications team.

    • Lay the Strategic Foundations of Your Applications Team – Phase 1: Get to Know Your Team
    • Applications Strategy Template
    • Applications Diagnostic Tool

    2. Get to know your stakeholders

    Understand your stakeholders.

    • Lay the Strategic Foundations of Your Applications Team – Phase 2: Get to Know Your Stakeholders

    3. Develop your applications strategy

    Design and plan your applications strategy.

    • Lay the Strategic Foundations of Your Applications Team – Phase 3: Develop Your Applications Strategy
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Lay the Strategic Foundations of Your Applications Team

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Get to Know Your Team

    The Purpose

    Understand the expectations, structure, and dynamics of your applications team.

    Review your team’s current capacity.

    Gauge the team’s effectiveness to execute their operating model.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Clear understanding of the current responsibilities and accountabilities of your teams.

    Identification of improvement opportunities based on your team’s performance.

    Activities

    1.1 Define your team’s role and responsibilities.

    1.2 Understand your team’s application and project portfolios.

    1.3 Understand your team’s values and expectations.

    1.4 Gauge your team’s ability to execute your operating model.

    Outputs

    Current team structure, RACI chart, and operating model

    Application portfolios currently managed by applications team and projects currently committed to

    List of current guiding principles and team expectations

    Team effectiveness of current operating model

    2 Get to Know Your Stakeholders

    The Purpose

    Understand the expectations of stakeholders.

    Review the services stakeholders consume to support their applications.

    Gauge stakeholder satisfaction of the services and applications your team provides and supports.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Grounded understanding of the drivers and motivators of stakeholders that teams should accommodate.

    Identification of improvement opportunities that will increase the value your team delivers to stakeholders.

    Activities

    2.1 Understand your stakeholders and applications services.

    2.2 Define stakeholder expectations.

    2.3 Gauge stakeholder satisfaction of applications services and portfolio.

    Outputs

    Expectations stakeholders have on the applications team and the applications services they use

    List of applications expectations

    Stakeholder satisfaction of current operating model

    3 Develop Your Applications Strategy

    The Purpose

    Align and consolidate a single set of applications expectations.

    Develop key initiatives to alleviate current pain points and exploit existing opportunities to deliver new value.

    Create an achievable roadmap that is aligned to organizational priorities and accommodate existing constraints.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Applications team and stakeholders are aligned on the core focus of the applications department.

    Initiatives to address the high priority issues and opportunities.

    Activities

    3.1 Define your applications expectations.

    3.2 Investigate your diagnostic results.

    3.3 Envision your future state.

    3.4 Create a tactical plan to achieve your future state.

    3.5 Finalize your applications strategy.

    Outputs

    List of applications expectations that accommodates the team and stakeholder needs

    Root causes to issues and opportunities revealed in team and stakeholder assessments

    Future-state applications portfolio, operating model, supporting people, process, and technologies, and applications strategic model

    Roadmap that lays out initiatives to achieve the future state

    Completed applications strategy

    Adapt Your Customer Experience Strategy to Successfully Weather COVID-19

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}536|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Customer Relationship Management
    • Parent Category Link: /customer-relationship-management
    • COVID-19 is an unprecedented global pandemic. It’s creating significant challenges across every sector.
    • Collapse of financial markets and a steep decline in consumer confidence has most firms nervous about revenue shortfalls and cash burn rates.
    • The economic impact of COVID-19 is freezing IT budgets and sharply changing IT priorities.
    • The human impact of COVID-19 is likely to lead to staffing shortfalls and knowledge gaps.
    • COVID-19 may be in play for up to two years.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    The challenges posed by the virus are compounded by the fact that consumer expectations for strong service delivery remain high:

    • Customers still expect timely, on-demand service from the businesses they engage with.
    • There is uncertainty about how to maintain strong, revenue-driving experiences when faced with the operational challenges posed by the virus.
    • COVID-19 is changing how organizations prioritize spending priorities within their CXM strategies.

    Impact and Result

    • Info-Tech recommends rapidly updating your strategy for customer experience management to ensure it can rise to the occasion.
    • Start by assessing the risk COVID-19 poses to your CXM approach and how it’ll impact marketing, sales, and customer service functions.
    • Implement actionable measures to blunt the threat of COVID-19 while protecting revenue, maintaining consistent product and service delivery, and improving the integrity of your brand. We’ll dive into five proven techniques in this brief!

    Adapt Your Customer Experience Strategy to Successfully Weather COVID-19 Research & Tools

    Start here

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should examine the impact of COVID-19 on customer experience strategy, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    • Adapt Your Customer Experience Strategy to Successfully Weather COVID-19 Storyboard

    1. Assess the impact of COVID-19 on your CXM strategy

    Create a consolidated, updated view of your current customer experience management strategy and identify which elements can be capitalized on to dampen the impact of COVID-19 and which elements are vulnerabilities that the pandemic may threaten to exacerbate.

    2. Blunt the damage of COVID-19 with new CXM tactics

    Create a roadmap of business and technology initiatives through the lens of customer experience management that can be used to help your organization protect its revenue, maintain customer engagement, and enhance its brand integrity.

    [infographic]

    Responsibly Resume IT Operations in the Office

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}423|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: DR and Business Continuity
    • Parent Category Link: /business-continuity

    Having shifted operations almost overnight to a remote work environment, and with the crisis management phase of the COVID-19 pandemic winding down, IT leaders and organizations are faced with the following issues:

    • A reduced degree of control with respect to the organization’s assets.
    • Increased presence of unapproved workaround methods, including applications and devices not secured by the organization.
    • Pressure to resume operations at pre-pandemic cadence while still operating in recovery mode.
    • An anticipated game plan for restarting the organization’s project activities.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    An organization’s shift back toward the pre-pandemic state cannot be carried out in isolation. Things have changed. Budgets, resource availability, priorities, etc., will not be the same as they were in early March. Organizations must ensure that all departments work collaboratively to support office repatriation. IT must quickly identify the must-dos to allow safe return to the office, while prioritizing tasks relating to the repopulation of employees, technical assets, and operational workloads via an informed and streamlined roadmap.

    As employees return to the office, PMO and portfolio leaders must sift through unclear requirements and come up with a game plan to resume project activities mid-pandemic. You need to develop an approach, and fast.

    Impact and Result

    Responsibly resume IT operations in the office:

    • Evaluate risk tolerance
    • Prepare to repatriate people to the office
    • Prepare to repatriate assets to the office
    • Prepare to repatriate workloads to the office
    • Prioritize your tasks and build your roadmap

    Quickly restart the engine of your PPM:

    • Restarting the engine of the project portfolio won’t be as simple as turning a key and hitting the gas. The right path forward will differ for every project portfolio practice.
    • Therefore, in this publication we put forth a multi-pass approach that PMO and portfolio managers can follow depending on their unique situations and needs.
    • Each approach is accompanied by a checklist and recommendations for next steps to get you on right path fast.

    Responsibly Resume IT Operations in the Office Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    As the post-pandemic landscape begins to take shape, ensure that IT can effectively prepare and support your employees as they move back to the office.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Evaluate your new risk tolerance

    Identify the new risk landscape and risk tolerance for your organization post-pandemic. Determine how this may impact the second wave of pandemic transition tasks.

    • Responsibly Resume IT Operations in the Office – Phase 1: Evaluate Your New Risk Tolerance
    • Resume Operations Information Security Pressure Analysis Tool

    2. Repatriate people to the office

    Prepare to return your employees to the office. Ensure that IT takes into account the health and safety of employees, while creating an efficient and sustainable working environment

    • Responsibly Resume IT Operations in the Office – Phase 2: Repatriate People to the Office
    • Mid-Pandemic IT Prioritization Tool

    3. Repatriate assets to the office

    Prepare the organization's assets for return to the office. Ensure that IT takes into account the off-license purchases and new additions to the hardware family that took place during the pandemic response and facilitates a secure reintegration to the workplace.

    • Responsibly Resume IT Operations in the Office – Phase 3: Repatriate Assets to the Office

    4. Repatriate workloads to the office

    Prepare and position IT to support workloads in order to streamline office reintegration. This may include leveraging pre-existing solutions in different ways and providing additional workstreams to support employee processes.

    • Responsibly Resume IT Operations in the Office – Phase 4: Repatriate Workloads to the Office

    5. Prioritize your tasks and build the roadmap

    Once you've identified IT's supporting tasks, it's time to prioritize. This phase walks through the activity of prioritizing based on cost/effort, alignment to business, and security risk reduction weightings. The result is an operational action plan for resuming office life.

    • Responsibly Resume IT Operations in the Office – Phase 5: Prioritize Your Tasks and Build the Roadmap

    6. Restart the engine of your project portfolio

    Restarting the engine of the project portfolio mid-pandemic won’t be as simple as turning a key and hitting the gas. Use this concise research to find the right path forward for your organization.

    • Restart the Engine of Your Project Portfolio
    [infographic]

    2021 Q3 Research Highlights

    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: The Briefs
    • Parent Category Link: /the-briefs
    Our research team is a prolific bunch! Every quarter we produce lots of research to help you get the most value out of your organization. This PDF contains a selection of our most compelling research from the third quarter of 2021.

    Gain Real Insights with a Social Analytics Program

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}561|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Marketing Solutions
    • Parent Category Link: /marketing-solutions
    • Social media is wildly popular with consumers and as a result, many businesses are starting to develop a presence on social media services like Facebook and Twitter. However, many businesses still struggle with understanding how to leverage consumer insights from these services to drive business decisions. They’re intimidated by the sheer volume of social data, and aren’t sure what to do about it.
    • Companies that do have an analytics program are often operating it on an ad-hoc basis rather than making an effort to integrate social insights with existing sourcing of consumer data. In doing this, they’re failing to make holistic decisions and missing out on valuable consumer and competitive insights.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Social analytics are indispensable in gaining real-time insights across marketing, sales, and customer service. SMBs can use social analytics to gain valuable consumer insights at a significantly lower expense than traditional forms of market research.
    • The greatest value from social analytics comes when organizations marry social data sources with other forms of customer information, such as point-of-sale data, customer surveys, focus groups, and psychographic profiles.
    • Social analytics must be integrated with your broader BI program for maximum effect. Consider creating a Customer Insights Center of Excellence (CICOE) to serve as a one-stop shop for both traditional and social customer analytics.
    • IT has an invaluable role to play in helping to govern and manage the analytics program. A best-of-breed Social Media Management Platform is the key enabling technology for conducting analytics, and IT must assist with selection, implementation and operation of this solution.
    • Internal social analytics is an emerging field that allows you to gauge the sentiment of your employees, while turbocharging ideation and feedback processes. Social networking analysis is particularly valuable for internal analysis.

    Impact and Result

    • Understand the value of a social analytics program and the various departmental use cases – how social analytics improves decision making and boosts critical KPIs like revenue attainment and customer satisfaction.
    • Determine the different social metrics (such as sentiment and frequency analysis) your business should be tracking and how to turn metrics into deep consumer insights.
    • Follow a step-by-step guide for successfully executing a social analytics program across your organization.
    • Roll out an internal analytics program to gauge the sentiment of your employees, improve engagement, and understand informal influencer networks.

    Gain Real Insights with a Social Analytics Program Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Determine the organization’s use cases

    Decide which functional areas in the organization will benefit the most from using social data, and create use cases accordingly.

    • Storyboard: Gain Real Insights with a Social Analytics Program

    2. Define and interpret metrics

    Identify and evaluate key social analytics metrics and understand the importance of combining multiple metrics to get the most out of the analytics program.

    • Social Analytics Maturity Assessment

    3. Execute the social analytics program

    Leverage a cross-departmental Social Media Steering Committee and evaluate SMMPs and other social analytics tools.

    • Social Analytics Specialist
    • Social Analytics Business Plan

    4. Leverage internal social analytics

    Identify specific uses of internal social analytics: crowd-sourcing ideation, harvesting employee feedback, and rewarding internal brand advocates.

    [infographic]

    Assess the Viability of M365-O365 Security Add-Ons

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}251|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Security Strategy & Budgeting
    • Parent Category Link: /security-strategy-and-budgeting

    The technical side of IT security demands the best security possible, but the business side of running IT demands that you determine what is cost-effective and can still do the job. You likely shrugged off the early iterations of Microsoft’s security efforts, but you may have heard that things have changed. Where do you start in evaluating Microsoft’s security products in terms of effectiveness? The value proposition sounds tremendous to the CFO, “free” security as part of your corporate license, but how does it truly measure up and how do you articulate your findings to the business?

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    Microsoft’s security products have improved to the point where they are often ranked competitively with mainstream security products. Depending on your organization’s licensing of Office 365/Microsoft 365, some of these products are included in what you’re already paying for. That value proposition is hard to deny.

    Impact and Result

    Determine what is important to the business, and in what order of priority.

    Take a close look at your current solution and determine what are table stakes, what features you would like to have in its replacement, and what your current solution is missing.

    Consider Microsoft’s security solutions using an objective methodology. Sentiment will still be a factor, but it shouldn’t dictate the decision you make for the good of the business.

    Assess the Viability of M365/O365 Security Add-Ons Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to assess the viability of M365/O365 security add-ons. Review Info-Tech’s methodology and understand the four key steps to completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Review your current state

    Examine what you are licensed for, what you are paying, what you need, and what your constraints are.

    • Microsoft 365/Office 365 Security Add-Ons Assessment Tool

    2. Assess your needs

    Determine what is “good enough” security and assess the needs of your organization.

    3. Select your path

    Decide what you will go with and start planning your next steps.

    [infographic]

    Spread Best Practices With an Agile Center of Excellence

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}152|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 10.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $97,499 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 26 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Development
    • Parent Category Link: /development
    • Your organization is looking to create consistency across all Agile teams to drive greater business results and alignment.
    • You are seeking to organically grow Agile capabilities within the organization through a set of support structures and facilitated through shared learning and capabilities.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Social capital can be an enabler, but also a barrier. People can only manage a finite number of relationships; ensure that the connections the Center of Excellence (CoE) facilitates are purposeful.
    • Don’t over govern. Empowerment is critical to enable improvements; set boundaries and let teams work inside them with autonomy.
    • Legitimize through listening. A CoE will not be leveraged unless it aligns with the needs of its users. Invest the time to align with the functional expectations of your Agile teams.

    Impact and Result

    • Create a set of service offerings aligned with both corporate objectives and the functional expectations of its customers to ensure broad support and utility of the invested resources.
    • Understand some of the cultural and processual challenges you will face when forming a center of excellence, and address them using Info-Tech’s Agile adoption model.

    Spread Best Practices With an Agile Center of Excellence Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should build an Agile Center of Excellence, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Strategically align the Center of Excellence

    Create strategic alignment between the CoE and the organization’s goals, objectives, and vision.

    • Spread Best Practices With an Agile Center of Excellence – Phase 1: Strategically Align the Center of Excellence

    2. Standardize the Center of Excellence’s service offerings

    Build an engagement plan based on a standardized adoption model to ensure your CoE service offerings are accessible and consistent across the organization.

    • Spread Best Practices With an Agile Center of Excellence – Phase 2: Standardize the Center of Excellence’s Service Offerings

    3. Operate the Center of Excellence

    Operate the CoE to provide service offerings to Agile teams, identify improvements to optimize the function of your Agile teams, and effectively manage and communicate change.

    • Spread Best Practices With an Agile Center of Excellence – Phase 3: Operationalize Your Agile Center of Excellence
    • ACE Satisfaction Survey
    • CoE Maturity Diagnostic Tool
    • ACE Benefits Tracking Tool
    • ACE Communications Deck
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Spread Best Practices With an Agile Center of Excellence

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Determine Vision of CoE

    The Purpose

    Create strategic alignment between the CoE and the organization’s goals, objectives, and vision.

    Understand how your key stakeholders will impact the longevity of your CoE.

    Determine your CoE structure and staff.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Top-down alignment with strategic aims of the organization.

    A set of high-level use cases to form the CoE’s service offerings around.

    Visualization of key stakeholders, with their current and desired power and involvement documented.

    Activities

    1.1 Identify and prioritize organizational business objectives.

    1.2 Form use cases for the points of alignment between your Agile Center of Excellence (ACE) and business objectives.

    1.3 Prioritize your ACE stakeholders.

    Outputs

    Prioritized business objectives

    Business-aligned use cases to form CoE’s service offerings

    Stakeholder map of key influencers

    2 Define Service Offerings of CoE

    The Purpose

    Document the functional expectations of the Agile teams.

    Refine your business-aligned use cases with your collected data to achieve both business and functional alignment.

    Create a capability map that visualizes and prioritizes your key service offerings.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Understanding of some of the identified concerns, pain points, and potential opportunities from your stakeholders.

    Refined use cases that define the service offerings the CoE provides to its customers.

    Prioritization for the creation of service offerings with a capability map.

    Activities

    2.1 Classified pains and opportunities.

    2.2 Refine your use cases to identify your ACE functions and services.

    2.3 Visualize your ACE functions and service offerings with a capability map.

    Outputs

    Classified pains and opportunities

    Refined use cases based on pains and opportunities identified during ACE requirements gathering

    ACE Capability Map

    3 Define Engagement Plans

    The Purpose

    Align service offerings with an Agile adoption model so that teams have a structured way to build their skills.

    Standardize the way your organization will interact with the Center of Excellence to ensure consistency in best practices.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Mechanisms put in place for continual improvement and personal development for your Agile teams.

    Interaction with the CoE is standardized via engagement plans to ensure consistency in best practices and predictability for resourcing purposes.

    Activities

    3.1 Further categorize your use cases within the Agile adoption model.

    3.2 Create an engagement plan for each level of adoption.

    Outputs

    Adoption-aligned service offerings

    Role-based engagement plans

    4 Define Metrics and Plan Communications

    The Purpose

    Develop a set of metrics for the CoE to monitor business-aligned outcomes with.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    The foundations of continuous improvement are established with a robust set of Agile metrics.

    Activities

    4.1 Define metrics that align with your Agile business objectives.

    4.2 Define target ACE performance metrics.

    4.3 Define Agile adoption metrics.

    4.4 Assess the interaction and communication points of your Agile team.

    4.5 Create a communication plan for change.

    Outputs

    Business objective-aligned metrics

    CoE performance metrics

    Agile adoption metrics

    Assessment of organizational design

    CoE communication plan

    Further reading

    Spread Best Practices With an Agile Center of Excellence

    Achieve ongoing alignment between Agile teams and the business with a set of targeted service offerings.

    ANALYST PERSPECTIVE

    "Inconsistent processes and practices used across Agile teams is frequently cited as a challenge to adopting and scaling Agile within organizations. (VersionOne’s 13th Annual State of Agile Report [N=1,319]) Creating an Agile Center of Excellence (ACE) is a popular way to try to impose structure and improve performance. However, simply establishing an ACE does not guarantee you will be successful with Agile. When setting up an ACE you must: Define ACE services based on identified stakeholder needs. Staff the ACE with respected, “hands on” people, who deliver identifiable value to your Agile teams. Continuously evolve ACE service offerings to maximize stakeholder satisfaction and value delivered."

    Alex Ciraco, Research Director, Applications Practice Info-Tech Research Group

    Our understanding of the problem

    This Research Is Designed For:

    • A CIO who is looking for a way to optimize their Agile capabilities and ensure ongoing alignment with business objectives.
    • An applications director who is looking for mechanisms to inject continuous improvement into organization-wide Agile practices.

    This Research Will Help You:

    • Align your Agile support structure with business objectives and the functional expectations of its users.
    • Standardize the ways in which Agile teams develop and learn to create consistency in purpose and execution.
    • Track and communicate successes to ensure the long-term viability of an Agile Center of Excellence (ACE).

    This Research Will Also Assist

    • Project managers who are tasked with managing Agile projects.
    • Application development managers who are struggling with establishing consistency, transparency, and collaboration across their teams.

    This Research Will Help Them:

    • Provide service offerings to their team members that will help them personally and collectively to develop desired skills.
    • Provide oversight and transparency into Agile projects and outcomes through ongoing monitoring.

    Executive summary

    Situation

    • Your organization has had some success with Agile, but needs to drive consistency across Agile teams for better business results and alignment.
    • You are seeking to organically grow Agile capabilities within the organization through a set of support services and facilitated through shared learning and capabilities.

    Complication

    • Organizational constraints, culture clash, and lack of continuous top-down support are hampering your Agile growth and maturity.
    • Attempts to create consistency across Agile teams and processes fail to account for the expectations of users and stakeholders, leaving them detached from projects and creating resistance.

    Resolution

    • Align the service offerings of your ACE with both corporate objectives and the functional expectations of its stakeholders to ensure broad support and utilization of the invested resources.
    • Understand some of the culture and process challenges you will face when forming an ACE, and address them using Info-Tech’s Agile adoption journey model.
    • Track the progress of the ACE and your Agile teams. Use this data to find root causes for issues, and ideate to implement solutions for challenges as they arise over time.
    • Effectively define and propagate improvements to your Agile teams in order to drive business-valued results.
    • Communicate progress to interested stakeholders to ensure long-term viability of the Center of Excellence (CoE).

    Info-Tech Insight

    1. Define ACE services based on stakeholder needs.Don’t assume you know what your stakeholders need without talking to them.
    2. Staff the ACE strategically. Choose those who are thought leaders and proven change agents.
    3. Continuously improve based on metrics and feedback.Constantly monitor how your ACE is performing and adjust to feedback.

    Info-Tech’s Agile Journey related Blueprints

    1. Stabilize

    Implement Agile Practices That Work

    Begin your Agile transformation with a comprehensive readiness assessment and a pilot project to adopt Agile development practices and behaviors that fit.

    2. Sustain

    YOU ARE HERE

    Spread Best Practices with an Agile Center of Excellence

    Form an ACE to support Agile development at all levels of the organization with thought leadership, strategic development support & process innovation.

    3. Scale

    Enable Organization-Wide Collaboration by Scaling Agile

    Extend the benefits of your Agile pilot project into your organization by strategically scaling Agile initiatives that will meet stakeholders’ needs.

    4. Satisfy

    Transition to Product Delivery Introduce product-centric delivery practices to drive greater benefits and better delivery outcomes.

    1.1 Determine the vision of your ACE

    1.2 Define the service offerings of your ACE

    2.1 Define an adoption plan for Agile teams

    2.2 Create an ACE engagement plan

    2.3 Define metrics to measure success

    3.1 Optimize the success of your ACE

    3.2 Plan change to enhance your Agile initiatives

    3.3 Conduct ongoing retrospectives

    Supporting Capabilities and Practices

    Modernize Your SDLC

    Remodel the stages of your lifecycle to standardize your definition of a successful product.

    Build a Strong Foundation for Quality

    Instill quality assurance practices and principles in each stage of your software development lifecycle.

    Implement DevOps Practices That Work

    Fix, deploy, and support applications quicker though development and operations collaboration.

    What is an Agile Center of Excellence?

    NOTE: Organizational change is hard and prone to failure. Determine your organization’s level of readiness for Agile transformation (and recommended actions) by completing Info-Tech’s Agile Transformation Readiness Tool.

    An ACE amplifies good practices that have been successfully employed within your organization, effectively allowing you to extend the benefits obtained from your Agile pilot(s) to a wider audience.

    From the viewpoint of the business, members of the ACE provide expertise and insights to the entire organization in order to facilitate Agile transformation and ensure standard application of Agile good practices.

    From the viewpoint of your Agile teams, it provides a community of individuals that share experiences and lessons learned, propagate new ideas, and raise questions or concerns so that delivering business value is always top of mind.

    An ACE provides the following:

    1. A mechanism to gather thought leadership to maximize the accessibility and reach of your Agile investment.
    2. A mechanism to share innovations and ideas to facilitate knowledge transfer and ensure broadly applicable innovations do not go to waste.
    3. Strategic alignment to ensure that Agile practices are driving value towards business objectives.
    4. Purposeful good practices to ensure that the service offerings provided align with expectations of both your Agile practitioners and stakeholders.

    SIDEBAR: What is a Community of Practice? (And how does it differ from a CoE?)

    Some organizations prefer Communities of Practice (CoP) to Centers of Excellence (CoE). CoPs are different from CoEs:

    A CoP is an affiliation of people who share a common practice and who have a desire to further the practice itself … and of course to share knowledge, refine best practices, and introduce standards. CoPs are defined by their domain of interest, but the membership is a social structure comprised of volunteer practitioners

    – Wenger, E., R. A. McDermott, et al. (2002) Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge, Harvard Business Press.

    CoPs differ from a CoE mainly in that they tend to have no geographical boundaries, they hold no hierarchical power within a firm, and they definitely can never have structure determined by the company. However, one of the most obvious and telling differences lies in the stated motive of members – CoPs exist because they have active practitioner members who are passionate about a specific practice, and the goals of a CoP are to refine and improve their chosen domain of practice – and the members provide discretionary effort that is not paid for by the employer

    – Matthew Loxton (June 1, 2011) CoP vs CoE – What’s the difference, and Why Should You Care?, Wordpress.com

    What to know about CoPs:

    1. Less formal than a CoE
      • Loosely organized by volunteer practitioners who are interested in advancing the practice.
    2. Not the Authoritative Voice
      • Stakeholders engage the CoP voluntarily, and are not bound by them.
    3. Not funded by Organization
      • CoP members are typically volunteers who provide support in addition to their daily responsibilities.
    4. Not covered in this Blueprint
      • In depth analysis on CoPs is outside the scope of this Blueprint.

    What does an ACE do? Six main functions derived from Info-Tech’s CLAIM+G Framework

    1. Learning
    • Provide training and development and enable engagement based on identified interaction points to foster organizational growth.
  • Tooling
    • Promote the use of standardized tooling to improve efficiency and consistency throughout the organization.
  • Supporting
    • Enable your Agile teams to access subject-matter expertise by facilitating knowledge transfer and documenting good practices.
  • Governing
    • Create operational boundaries for Agile teams, and monitor their progress and ability to meet business objectives within these boundaries.
  • Monitoring
    • Demonstrate the value the CoE is providing through effective metric setting and ongoing monitoring of Agile’s effectiveness.
  • Guiding
    • Provide guidance, methodology, and knowledge for teams to leverage to effectively meet organizational business objectives.
  • Many organizations encounter challenges to scaling Agile

    Tackle the following barriers to Agile adoption with a business-aligned ACE.

    List based on reported impediments from VersionOne’s 13th Annual State of Agile Report (N=1,319)

    1. Organizational culture at odds with Agile values
    • The ACE identifies and measures the value of Agile to build support from senior business leaders for shifting the organizational culture and achieving tangible business benefits.
  • General organizational resistance to change
    • Resistance comes from a lack of trust. Optimized value delivery from Info-Tech’s Agile adoption model will build the necessary social capital to drive cultural change.
  • Inadequate management support and sponsorship
    • Establishing an ACE will require senior management support and sponsorship. Its formation sends a strong signal to the organizational leadership that Agile is here to stay.
  • Lack of skills/experience with Agile methods
    • The ACE provides a vehicle to absorb external training into an internal development program so that Agile capabilities can be grown organically within the organization.
  • Inconsistent processes and practices across teams
    • The ACE provides support to individual Agile teams and will guide them to adopt consistent processes and practices which have a proven track record in the organization.
  • Insufficient training and education
    • The ACE will assist teams with obtaining the Agile skills training they need to be effective in the organization, and support a culture of continuous learning.
  • Overcome your Agile scaling challenges with a business aligned ACE

    An ACE drives consistency and transparency without sacrificing the ability to innovate. It can build on the success of your Agile pilot(s) by encouraging practices known to work in your organization.

    Support Agile Teams

    Provide services designed to inject evolving good practices into workflows and remove impediments or roadblocks from your Agile team’s ability to deliver value.

    Maintain Business Alignment

    Maintain alignment with corporate objectives without impeding business agility in the long term. The ACE functions as an interface layer so that changing expectations can be adapted without negatively impacting Agile teams.

    Facilitate Learning Events

    Avoid the risk of innovation and subject-matter expertise being lost or siloed by facilitating knowledge transfer and fostering a continuous learning environment.

    Govern Improvements

    Set baselines, monitor metrics, and run retrospectives to help govern process improvements and ensure that Agile teams are delivering expected benefits.

    Shift Culture

    Instill Agile thinking and behavior into the organization. The ACE must encourage innovation and be an effective agent for change.

    Use your ACE to go from “doing” Agile to “being” Agile

    Organizations that do Agile without embracing the changes in behavior will not reap the benefits.

    Doing what was done before

    • Processes and Tools
    • Comprehensive Documentation
    • Contract Negotiation
    • Following a Plan

    Being Prescriptive

    Going through the motions

    • Uses SCRUM and tools such as Jira
    • Plans multiple sprints in detail
    • Talks to stakeholders once in a release
    • Works off a fixed scope BRD

    Doing Agile

    Living the principles

    • Individuals and Interactions
    • Working Software
    • Customer Collaboration
    • Responding to Change

    Being Agile

    “(‘Doing Agile’ is) just some rituals but without significant change to support the real Agile approach as end-to-end, business integration, value focus, and team empowerment.” - Arie van Bennekum

    Establishing a CoE does not guarantee success

    Simply establishing a Center of Excellence for any discipline does not guarantee its success:

    The 2019 State of DevOps Report found that organizations which had established DevOps CoEs underperformed compared to organizations which adopted other approaches for driving DevOps transformation. (Accelerate State of DevOps Report 2019 [N=~1,000])

    Still, Agile Centers of Excellence can and do successfully drive Agile adoption in organizations. So what sets the successful examples apart from the others? Here’s what some have to say:

    The ACE must be staffed with qualified people with delivery experience! … [It is] effectively a consulting practice, that can evolve and continuously improve its services … These services are collectively about ‘enablement’ as an output, more than pure training … and above all, the ability to empirically measure the progress” – Paul Blaney, TD Bank

    “When leaders haven’t themselves understood and adopted Agile approaches, they may try to scale up Agile the way they have attacked other change initiatives: through top-down plans and directives. The track record is better when they behave like an Agile team. That means viewing various parts of the organization as their customers.” – HBR, “Agile at Scale”

    “the Agile CoE… is truly meant to be measured by the success of all the other groups, not their own…[it] is meant to be serving the teams and helping them improve, not by telling them what to do, but rather by listening, understanding and helping them adapt.” - Bart Gerardi, PMI

    The CoE must also avoid becoming static, as it’s crucial the team can adjust as quickly as business and customer needs change, and evolve the technology as necessary to remain competitive.” – Forbes, “RPA CoE (what you need to know)”

    "The best CoEs are formed from thought leaders and change agents within the CoE domain. They are the process and team innovators who will influence your CoE roadmap and success. Select individuals who feel passionate about Agile." – Hans Eckman, InfoTech

    To be successful with your ACE, do the following…

    Info-Tech Insight

    Simply establishing an Agile Center of Excellence does not guarantee its success. When setting up your ACE, optimize its impact on the organization by doing the following 3 things:

    1. Define ACE services based on stakeholder needs. Be sure to broadly survey your stakeholders and identify the ACE functions and services which will best meet their needs. ACE services must clearly deliver business value to the organization and the Agile teams it supports.
    2. Staff the ACE strategically. Select ACE team members who have real world, hands-on delivery experience, and are well respected by the Agile teams they will serve. Where possible, select internal thought leaders in your organization who have the credibility needed to effect positive change.
    3. Continuously improve ACE services based on metrics and feedback. The value your ACE brings to the organization must be clear and measurable, and do not assume that your functions and services will remain static. You must regularly monitor both your metrics and feedback from your Agile teams, and adjust ACE behavior to improve/maximize these over time.

    Spread Best Practices With an Agile Center of Excellence

    This blueprint will walk you through the steps needed to build the foundations for operational excellence within an Agile Center of Excellence.

    Phase 1 - Strategically Align the CoE

    Create strategic alignment between the CoE and the organization’s goals, objectives, and vision. This alignment translates into the CoE mandate intended to enhance the way Agile will enable teams to meet business objectives.

    Phase 2 - Standardize the CoEs Service Offerings

    Build an engagement plan based on a standardized adoption model to ensure your CoE service offerings are accessible and consistent across the organization. Create and consolidate key performance indicators to measure the CoEs utility and whether or not the expected value is being translated to tangible results.

    Phase 3 - Operate the CoE

    Operate the CoE to provide service offerings to Agile teams, identify improvements to optimize the function of your Agile teams, and effectively manage and communicate change so that teams can grow within the Agile adoption model and optimize value delivery both within your Agile environment and across functions.

    Info-Tech’s Practice Adoption Journey

    Use Info-Tech’s Practice Adoption Journey model to establish your ACE. Building social capital (stakeholders’ trust in your ability to deliver positive outcomes) incrementally is vital to ensure that everyone is aligned to new mindsets and culture as your Agile practices scale.

    Trust & Competency ↓

    DEFINE

    Begin to document your development workflow or value chain, implement a tracking system for KPIs, and start gathering metrics and reporting them transparently to the appropriate stakeholders.

    ITERATE

    Use collected metrics and retrospectives to stabilize team performance by reducing areas of variability in your workflow and increasing the consistency at which targets are met.

    COLLABORATE

    Use information to support changes and adopt appropriate practices to make incremental improvements to the existing environment.

    EMPOWER

    Drive behavioral and cultural changes that will empower teams to be accountable for their own success and learning.

    INNOVATE

    Use your built-up trust and support practice innovation, driving the definition and adoption of new practices.

    Align your ACE with your organization’s strategy

    This research set will assist you with aligning your ACEs services to the objectives of the business in order to justify the resources and funding required by your Agile program.

    Business Objectives → Alignment ←ACE Functions

    Business justification to continue to fund a Center of Excellence can be a challenge, especially with traditional thinking and rigid stakeholders. Hit the ground running and show value to your key influencers through business alignment and metrics that will ensure that the ACE is worth continuous investment.

    Alignment leads to competitive advantage

    The pace of change in customer expectations, competitive landscapes, and business strategy is continuously increasing. It is critical to develop a method to facilitate ongoing alignment to shifting business and development expectations seamlessly and ensure that your Agile teams are able to deliver expected business value.

    Use Info-Tech’s CoE Operating Model to define the service offerings of your ACE

    Understand where your inputs and outputs lie to create an accessible set of service offerings for your Agile teams.

    The image shows a graphic of the COE Operating Model, showing the inputs and outputs, including Other CoEs (at top); Stakeholder Needs (at left); Metrics and Feedback (at bottom); and ACE Functions and Services (at right)

    Continuously improve the ACE to ensure long-term viability

    Improvement involves the continuous evaluation of the performance of your teams, using well-defined metrics and reasonable benchmarks that are supplemented by analogies and root-cause analysis in retrospectives.

    Monitor

    Monitor your metrics to ensure desired benefits are being realized. The ACE is responsible for ensuring that expected Agile benefits are achievable and on track. Monitor against your defined baselines to create transparency and accountability for desired outcomes.

    Iterate

    Run retrospectives to drive improvements and fixes into Agile projects and processes. Metrics falling short of expectations must be diagnosed and their root causes found, and fixes need to be communicated and injected back into the larger organization.

    Define

    Define metrics and set targets that align with the goals of the ACE. These metrics represent the ACEs expected value to the organization and must be measured against on a regular basis to demonstrate value to your key stakeholders.

    Beware the common risks of implementing your ACE

    Culture clash between Agile teams and larger organization

    Agile leverages empowered teams, meritocracy, and broad collaboration for success, but typical organizations are siloed and hierarchical with top down decision making. There needs to be a plan to enable a smooth transition from the current state towards the Agile target state.

    Persistence of tribal knowledge

    Agile relies on easy and open knowledge sharing, but organizational knowledge can sit in siloes. Employees may also try to protect their expertise for job security. It is important to foster knowledge sharing to ensure that critical know-how is accessible and doesn’t leave the organization with the individual.

    Rigid management structures

    Rigidity in how managers operate (performance reviews, human resource management, etc.) can result in cultural rejection of Agile. People need to be assessed on how they enable their teams rather than as individual contributors. This can help ensure that they are given sufficient opportunities to succeed. More support and less strict governance is key.

    Breakdown due to distributed teams

    When face-to-face interactions are challenging, ensure that you invest in the right communication technologies and remove cultural and process impediments to facilitate organization-wide collaboration. Alternative approaches like using documentation or email will not provide the same experience and value as a face-to-face conversation.

    The State of Maine used an ACE to foster positive cultural change

    CASE STUDY

    Industry - Government

    Source - Cathy Novak, Agile Government Leadership

    The State of Maine’s Agile Center of Excellence

    “The Agile CoE in the State of Maine is completely focused on the discipline of the methodology. Every person who works with Agile, or wants to work with Agile, belongs to the CoE. Every member of the CoE tells the same story, approaches the methodology the same way, and uses the same tools. The CoE also functions as an Agile research lab, experimenting with different standards and tools.

    The usual tools of project management – mission, goals, roles, and a high-level definition of done – can be found in Maine’s Agile CoE. For story mapping, teams use sticky notes on a large wall or whiteboard. Demonstrating progress this way provides for positive team dynamics and a psychological bang. The State of Maine uses a project management framework that serves as its single source of truth. Everyone knows what’s going on at all times and understands the purpose of what they are doing. The Agile team is continually looking for components that can be reused across other agencies and programs.”

    Results:

    • Realized positive culture change, leading to more collaborative and supportive teams.
    • Increased visibility of Agile benefits across functional groups.
    • Standardized methodology across Agile teams and increased innovation and experimentation with new standards and tools.
    • Improved traceability of projects.
    • Increased visibility and ability to determine root causes of problems and right the course when outcomes are not meeting expectations.

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    “Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful.”

    Guided Implementation

    “Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track.”

    Workshop

    “We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place.”

    Consulting

    “Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project.”

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

    Spread Best Practices With an Agile Center of Excellence – project overview

    1. Strategically align the Center of Excellence 2. Standardize the CoEs service offerings 3. Operate the Center of Excellence
    Best-Practice Toolkit

    1.1 Determine the vision of your ACE.

    1.2 Define the service offerings of your ACE.

    2.1 Define an adoption plan for your Agile teams.

    2.2 Create an ACE engagement plan.

    2.3 Define metrics to measure success.

    3.1 Optimize the success of your ACE.

    3.2 Plan change to enhance your Agile initiatives.

    3.3 Conduct ongoing retrospectives of your ACE.

    Guided Implementations
    • Align your ACE with the business.
    • Align your ACE with its users.
    • Dissect the key attributes of Agile adoption.
    • Form engagement plans for your Agile teams.
    • Discuss effective ACE metrics.
    • Conduct a baseline assessment of your Agile environment.
    • Interface ACE with your change management function.
    • Build a communications deck for key stakeholders.
    Onsite Workshop Module 1: Strategically align the ACE Module 2: Standardize the offerings of the ACE Module 3: Prepare for organizational change
    Phase 1 Outcome: Create strategic alignment between the CoE and organizational goals.

    Phase 2 Outcome: Build engagement plans and key performance indicators based on a standardized Agile adoption plan.

    Phase 3 Outcome: Operate the CoEs monitoring function, identify improvements, and manage the change needed to continuously improve.

    Workshop overview

    Contact your account representative or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Workshop Module 1 Workshop Module 2 Workshop Module 3 Workshop Module 4
    Activities

    Determine vision of CoE

    1.1 Identify and prioritize organizational business objectives.

    1.2 Form use cases for the points of alignment between your ACE and business objectives.

    1.3 Prioritize your ACE stakeholders.

    Define service offerings of CoE

    2.1 Form a solution matrix to organize your pain points and opportunities.

    2.2 Refine your use cases to identify your ACE functions and services.

    2.3 Visualize your ACE functions and service offerings with a capability map.

    Define engagement plans

    3.1 Further categorize your use cases within the Agile adoption model.

    3.2 Create an engagement plan for each level of adoption.

    Define metrics and plan communications

    4.1 Define metrics that align with your Agile business objectives.

    4.2 Define target ACE performance metrics.

    4.3 Define Agile adoption metrics.

    4.4 Assess the interaction and communication points of your Agile team.

    4.5 Create a communication plan for change.

    Deliverables
    1. Prioritized business objectives
    2. Business-aligned use cases to form CoEs service offerings
    3. Prioritized list of stakeholders
    1. Classified pains and opportunities
    2. Refined use cases based on pains and opportunities identified during ACE requirements gathering
    3. ACE capability map
    1. Adoption-aligned service offerings
    2. Role-specific engagement plans
    1. Business objective-aligned metrics
    2. ACE performance metrics
    3. Agile adoption metrics
    4. Assessment of organization design
    5. ACE Communication Plan

    Phase 1

    Strategically Align the Center of Excellence

    Spread Best Practices With an Agile Center of Excellence

    Begin by strategically aligning your Center of Excellence

    The first step to creating a high-functioning ACE is to create alignment and consensus amongst your key stakeholders regarding its purpose. Engage in a set of activities to drill down into the organization’s goals and objectives in order to create a set of high-level use cases that will evolve into the service offerings of the ACE.

    Phase 1 - Strategically Align the CoE

    Create strategic alignment between the CoE and the organization’s goals, objectives, and vision. This alignment translates into the CoE mandate intended to enhance the way Agile will enable teams to meet business objectives.

    Phase 2 - Standardize the CoEs Service Offerings

    Build an engagement plan based on a standardized adoption model to ensure your CoE service offerings are accessible and consistent across the organization. Create and consolidate key performance indicators to measure the CoEs utility and whether or not the expected value is being translated to tangible results.

    Phase 3 - Operate the CoE

    Operate the CoE to provide service offerings to Agile teams, identify improvements to optimize the function of your Agile teams, and effectively manage and communicate change so that teams can grow within the Agile adoption model and optimize value delivery both within your Agile environment and across functions.

    Phase 1 outline

    Call 1-888-670-8889 or email GuidedImplementations@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Complete these steps on your own, or call us to complete a guided implementation. A guided implementation is a series of 2-3 advisory calls that help you execute each phase of a project. They are included in most advisory memberships.

    Guided Implementation 1: Strategically align the ACE

    Proposed Time to Completion (in weeks): 1

    Step 1.1: Determine the vision of your ACE

    Start with an analyst kick off call:

    • Align your ACE with the business.

    Then complete these activities…

    1.1.1 Optional: Baseline your ACE maturity.

    1.1.2 Identify and prioritize organizational business objectives.

    1.1.3 Form use cases for the points of alignment between your ACE and business objectives.

    1.1.4 Prioritize your ACE stakeholders.

    1.1.5 Select a centralized or decentralized model for your ACE.

    1.1.6 Staff your ACE strategically.

    Step 1.2: Define the service offerings of your ACE

    Start with an analyst kick off call:

    • Align your ACE with its users.

    Then complete these activities…

    1.2.1 Form the Center of Excellence.

    1.2.2 Gather and document your existing Agile practices for the CoE.

    1.2.3 Interview stakeholders to align ACE requirements with functional expectations.

    1.2.4 Form a solution matrix to organize your pain points and opportunities.

    1.2.5 Refine your use cases to identify your ACE functions and services.

    1.2.6 Visualize your ACE functions and service offerings with a capability map.

    Phase 1 Results & Insights:

    • Aligning your ACE with the functional expectations of its users is just as critical as aligning with the business. Invest the time to understand how the ACE fits at all levels of the organization to ensure its highest effectiveness.

    Phase 1, Step 1: Determine the vision of your ACE

    Phase 1

    1.1 Determine the vision of your ACE

    1.2 Define the service offerings of your ACE

    Phase 2

    2.1 Define an adoption plan for your Agile teams

    2.2 Create an ACE engagement plan

    2.3 Define metrics to measure success

    Phase 3

    3.1 Optimize the success of your ACE

    3.2 Plan change to enhance your Agile initiatives

    3.3 Conduct ongoing retrospectives of your ACE

    Activities:

    1.1.1 Optional: Baseline your ACE maturity.

    1.1.2 Identify and prioritize organizational business objectives.

    1.1.3 Form use cases for the points of alignment between your ACE and business objectives.

    1.1.4 Prioritize your ACE stakeholders.

    1.1.5 Select a centralized or decentralized model for your ACE.

    1.1.6 Staff your ACE strategically.

    Outcomes:

    • Gather your leadership to position the ACE and align it with business priorities.
    • Form a set of high-level use cases for services that will support the enablement of business priorities.
    • Map the stakeholders of the ACE to visualize expected influence and current support levels for your initiative.

    What does an ACE do? Six main functions derived from Info-Tech’s CLAIM+G Framework

    1. Learning
    • Provide training and development and enable engagement based on identified interaction points to foster organizational growth.
  • Tooling
    • Promote the use of standardized tooling to improve efficiency and consistency throughout the organization.
  • Supporting
    • Enable your Agile teams to access subject-matter expertise by facilitating knowledge transfer and documenting good practices.
  • Governing
    • Create operational boundaries for Agile teams, and monitor their progress and ability to meet business objectives within these boundaries.
  • Monitoring
    • Demonstrate the value the CoE is providing through effective metric setting and ongoing monitoring of Agile’s effectiveness.
  • Guiding
    • Provide guidance, methodology, and knowledge for teams to leverage to effectively meet organizational business objectives.
  • OPTIONAL: If you have an existing ACE, use Info-Tech’s CoE Maturity Diagnostic Tool to baseline current practices

    1.1.1 Existing CoE Maturity Assessment

    Purpose

    If you already have established an ACE, use Info-Tech’s CoE Maturity Diagnostic Tool to baseline its current maturity level (this will act as a baseline for comparison after you complete this Blueprint). Assessing your ACEs maturity lets you know where you currently are, and where to look for improvements.

    Steps

    1. Download the CoE Maturity Diagnostic Tool to assess the maturity of your ACE.
    2. Complete the assessment tool with all members of your ACE team to determine your current Maturity score.
    3. Document the results in the ACE Communications Deck.

    Document results in the ACE Communications Deck.

    INFO-TECH DELIVERABLE

    The image is a screen capture of the CoE Maturity Diagnostic Tool

    Download the CoE Maturity Diagnostic Tool.

    Get your Agile leadership together and position the ACE

    Stakeholder Role Why they are essential players
    CIO/ Head of IT Program sponsor: Champion and set the tone for the Agile program. Critical in gaining and maintaining buy-in and momentum for the spread of Agile service offerings. The head of IT has insight and influence to drive buy-in from executive stakeholders and ensure the long-term viability of the ACE.
    Applications Director Program executor: Responsible for the formation of the CoE and will ensure the viability of the initial CoE objectives, use cases, and service offerings. Having a coordinator who is responsible for collating performance data, tracking results, and building data-driven action plans is essential to ensuring continuous success.
    Agile Subject-Matter Experts Program contributor: Provide information on the viability of Agile practices and help build capabilities on existing best practices. Agile’s success relies on adoption. Leverage the insights of people who have implemented and evangelized Agile within your organization to build on top of a working foundation.
    Functional Group Experts Program contributor: Provide information on the functional group’s typical processes and how Agile can achieve expected benefits. Agile’s primary function is to drive value to the business – it needs to align with the expected capabilities of existing functional groups in order to enhance them for the better.

    Align your ACE with your organization’s strategy

    This research set will assist you with aligning your ACEs services to the objectives of the business in order to justify the resources and funding required by your Agile program.

    Business Objectives → Alignment ←ACE Functions

    Business justification to continue to fund a Center of Excellence can be a challenge, especially with traditional thinking and rigid stakeholders. Hit the ground running and show value to your key influencers through business alignment and metrics that will ensure that the ACE is worth continuous investment.

    Alignment leads to competitive advantage

    The pace of change in customer expectations, competitive landscapes, and business strategy is continuously increasing. It is critical to develop a method to facilitate ongoing alignment to shifting business and development expectations seamlessly and ensure that your Agile teams are able to deliver expected business value.

    Activity: Identify and prioritize organizational business objectives

    1.1.2 2 Hours

    Input

    • Organizational business objectives

    Output

    • Prioritized business objectives

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers

    Participants

    • Agile leadership group
    1. List the primary high-level business objectives that your organization aims to achieve over the course of the following year (focusing on those that ACE can impact/support).
    2. Prioritize these business objectives while considering the following:
    • Criticality of completion: How critical is the initiative in enabling the business to achieve its goals?
    • Transformational impact: To what degree is the foundational structure of the business affected by the initiative (rationale: Agile can support impact on transformational issues)?
  • Document the hypothesized role of Agile in supporting these business objectives. Take the top three prioritized objectives forward for the establishment of your ACE. While in future years or iterations you can inject more offerings, it is important to target your service offerings to specific critical business objectives to gain buy-in for long-term viability of the CoE.
  • Sample Business Objectives:

    • Increase customer satisfaction.
    • Reduce time-to-market of product releases.
    • Foster a strong organizational culture.
    • Innovate new feature sets to differentiate product. Increase utilization rates of services.
    • Reduce product delivery costs.
    • Effectively integrate teams from a merger.
    • Offer more training programs for personal development.
    • Undergo a digital transformation.

    Understand potential hurdles when attempting to align with business objectives

    While there is tremendous pressure to align IT functions and the business due to the accelerating pace of change and technology innovation, you need to be aware that there are limitations in achieving this goal. Keep these challenges at the top of mind as you bring together your stakeholders to position the service offerings of your ACE. It is beneficial to make your stakeholders self-aware of these biases as well, so they come to the table with an open mind and are willing to find common ground.

    The search for total alignment

    There are a plethora of moving pieces within an organization and total alignment is not a plausible outcome.

    The aim of a group should not be to achieve total alignment, but rather reframe and consider ways to ensure that stakeholders are content with the ways they interact and that misalignment does not occur due to transparency or communication issues.

    “The business” implies unity

    While it may seem like the business is one unified body, the reality is that the business can include individuals or groups (CEO, CFO, IT, etc.) with conflicting priorities. While there are shared business goals, these entities may all have competing visions of how to achieve them. Alignment means compromise and agreement more than it means accommodating all competing views.

    Cost vs. reputation

    There is a political component to alignment, and sometimes individual aspirations can impede collective gain.

    While the business side may be concerned with cost, those on the IT side of things can be concerned with taking on career-defining projects to bolster their own credentials. This conflict can lead to serious breakdowns in alignment.

    Panera Bread used Agile to adapt to changing business needs

    CASE STUDY

    Industry Food Services

    Source Scott Ambler and Associates, Case Study

    Challenge

    Being in an industry with high competition, Panera Bread needed to improve its ability to quickly deliver desired features to end customers and adapt to changing business demands from high internal growth.

    Solution

    Panera Bread engaged in an Agile transformation through a mixture of Agile coaching and workshops, absorbing best practices from these engagements to drive Agile delivery frameworks across the enterprise.

    Results

    Adopting Agile delivery practices resulted in increased frequency of solution delivery, improving the relationship between IT and the business. Business satisfaction increased both with the development process and the outcomes from delivery.

    The transparency that was needed to achieve alignment to rapidly changing business needs resulted in improved communication and broad-scale reduced risk for the organization.

    "Agile delivery changed perception entirely by building a level of transparency and accountability into not just our software development projects, but also in our everyday working relationships with our business stakeholders. The credibility gains this has provided our IT team has been immeasurable and immediate."

    – Mike Nettles, VP IT Process and Architecture, Panera Bread

    Use Info-Tech’s CoE Operating Model to define the service offerings of your ACE

    Understand where your inputs and outputs lie to create an accessible set of service offerings for your Agile teams.

    Functional Input

    • Application Development
    • Project Management
    • CIO
    • Enterprise Architecture
    • Data Management
    • Security
    • Infrastructure & Operations
    • Who else?

    The image shows a graphic of the COE Operating Model, showing the inputs and outputs, including Other CoEs (at top); Stakeholder Needs (at left); Metrics and Feedback (at bottom); and ACE Functions and Services (at right)

    Input arrows represent functional group needs, feedback from Agile teams, and collaboration with other CoEs and CoPs

    Output arrows represent the services the CoE delivers and the benefits realized across the organization.

    ACE Operating Model: Governance & Metrics

    Governance & Metrics involves enabling success through the management of the ACEs resources and services, and ensuring that organizational structures evolve in concert with Agile growth and maturity. Your focus should be on governing, measuring, implementing, and empowering improvements.

    Effective governance will function to ensure the long-term effectiveness and viability of your ACE. Changes and improvements will happen continuously and you need a way to decide which to adopt as best practices.

    "Organizations have lengthy policies and procedures (e.g. code deployment, systems design, how requirements are gathered in a traditional setting) that need to be addressed when starting to implement an Agile Center of Excellence. Legacy ideas that end up having legacy policy are the ones that are going to create bottlenecks, waste resources, and disrupt your progress." – Doug Birgfeld, Senior Partner, Agile Wave

    Governance & Metrics

    • Manage organizational Agile standards, policies, and procedures.
    • Define organizational boundaries based on regulatory, compliance, and cultural requirements.
    • Ensure ongoing alignment of service offerings with business objectives.
    • Adapt organizational change management policies to reflect Agile practices.
    • CoE governance functions include:
      • Policy Management
      • Change Management
      • Risk Management
      • Stakeholder Management
      • Metrics/Feedback Monitoring

    ACE Operating Model: Services

    Services refers to the ability to deliver resourcing, guidance, and assistance across all Agile teams. By creating a set of shared services, you enable broad access to specialized resources, knowledge, and insights that will effectively scale to more teams and departments as Agile matures in your organization.

    A Services model:

    • Supports the organization by standardizing and centralizing service offerings, ensuring consistency of service delivery and accessibility across functional groups.
    • Provides a mechanism for efficient knowledge transfer and on-demand support.
    • Helps to drive productivity and project efficiencies through the organization by disseminating best practices.

    Services

    • Provide reference, support, and re-assurance to implement and adapt organizational best practices.
    • Interface relevant parties and facilitate knowledge transfer through shared learning and communities of practice.
    • Enable agreed-upon service levels through standardized support structures.
    • Shared services functions include:
      • Engagement Planning
      • Knowledge Management
      • Subject-Matter Expertise
      • Agile Team Evaluation

    ACE Operating Model: Technology

    Technology refers to a broad range of supporting tools to enable employees to complete their day-to-day tasks and effectively report on their outcomes. The key to technological support is to strike the right balance between flexibility and control based on your organization's internal and external constraints (policy, equipment, people, regulatory, etc.).

    "We sometimes forget the obvious truth that technology provides no value of its own; it is the application of technology to business opportunities that produces return on investment." – Robert McDowell, Author, In Search of Business Value

    Technology

    • Provide common software tools to enable alignment to organizational best practices.
    • Enable access to locally desired tools while considering organizational, technical, and scaling constraints.
    • Enable communication with a technical subject matter expert (SME).
    • Enable reporting consistency through training and maintenance of reporting mechanisms.
    • Technology functions can include:
      • Vendor Management
      • Application Support
      • Tooling Standards
      • Tooling Use Cases

    ACE Operating Model: Staff

    Staff is all about empowerment. The ACE should support and facilitate the sharing of ideas and knowledge sharing. Create processes and spaces where people are encouraged to come together, learn from, and share with each other. This setting will bring up new ideas to enhance productivity and efficiency in day-to-day activities while maintaining alignment with business objectives.

    "An Agile CoE is legitimized by its ability to create a space where people can come together, share, and learn from one another. By empowering teams to grow by themselves and then re-connect with each other you allow the creativity of your employees to flow back into the CoE." – Anonymous, Founder, Agile consultancy group

    Staff

    • Develop and provide training and day-to-day coaching that are aligned with organizational engagement and growth plans.
    • Include workflow change management to assist traditional roles with accommodating Agile practices.
    • Support the facilitation of knowledge transfer from localized Agile teams into other areas of the organization.
    • Achieve team buy-in and engagement with ACE services and capabilities. Provide a forum for collaboration and innovation.
    • People functions can include:
      • Onboarding
      • Coaching
      • Learning Facilitation

    Form use cases to align your ACE with business objectives

    What is a use case?

    A use case tells a story about how a system will be used to achieve a goal from the perspective of a user of that system. The people or other systems that interact with the use case are called “actors.” Use cases describe what a system must be able to do, not how it will do it.

    How does a use case play a role in building your ACE?

    Use cases are used to guide design by allowing you to highlight the intended function of a service provided by the Center of Excellence while maintaining a business focus. Jumping too quickly to a solution without fully understanding user and business needs leads to the loss of stakeholder buy-in and the Centers of Excellence rejection by teams.

    Hypothesized ACE user needs →Use Case←Business objective

    Activity: Form use cases for the points of alignment between your ACE and business objectives

    1.1.3 2 Hours

    Input

    • Prioritized business objectives
    • ACE functions

    Output

    • ACE use cases

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers

    Participants

    • Agile leadership group
    1. Using your prioritized business objectives and the six functions of a CoE, create high-level use cases for each point of alignment that describe how the Center of Excellence will better facilitate the realization of that business objective.
    2. For each use case, define the following:
      • Name: Generalized title for the use case.
      • Description: A high-level description of the expected CoE action.
    AGILE CENTER OF EXCELLENCE FUNCTIONS:
    Guiding Learning Tooling Supporting Governing Monitoring
    BUSINESS OBJECTIVES Reduce time-to-market of product releases
    Reduce product delivery costs
    Effectively integrate teams from a merger

    Activity: Form use cases for the points of alignment between your ACE and business objectives (continued)

    1.1.3 2 Hours

    The image shows the Reduce time-to-market of product releases row from the table in the previous section, filled in with sample information.

    Your goal should be to keep these as high level and generally applicable as possible as they provide an initial framework to further develop your service offerings. Begin to talk about the ways in which the ACE can support the realization of your business objectives and what those interactions may look like to customers of the ACE.

    Involve all relevant stakeholders to discuss the organizational goals and objectives of your ACE

    Avoid the rifts in stakeholder representation by ensuring you involve the relevant parties. Without representation and buy-in from all interested parties, your ACE may omit and fail to meet long-term organizational goals.

    By ensuring every group receives representation, your service offerings will speak for the broad organization and in turn meet the needs of the organization as a whole.

    • Business Units: Any functional groups that will be expected to engage with the ACE in order to achieve their business objectives.
    • Team Leads: Representation from the internal Agile community who is aware of the backgrounds, capabilities, and environments of their respective Agile teams.
    • Executive Sponsors: Those expected to evangelize and set the tone and direction for the ACE within the executive ranks of the organization. These roles are critical in gaining buy-in and maintaining momentum for ACE initiatives.

    Organization

    • ACE
      • Executive Sponsors
      • Team Leads
      • Business Units

    Activity: Prioritize your ACE stakeholders

    1.1.4 1 Hour

    Input

    • Prioritized business objectives

    Output

    • Prioritized list of stakeholders

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers

    Participants

    • Agile leadership group
    1. Using your prioritized business objectives, brainstorm, as a group, the potential list of stakeholders (representatives from business units, team leads, and executive sponsors) that would need to be involved in setting the tone and direction of your ACE.
    2. Evaluate each stakeholder in terms of power, involvement, impact, and support.
    • Power: How much influence does the stakeholder have? Enough to drive the CoE forward or into the ground?
    • Involvement: How interested is the stakeholder? How involved is the stakeholder in the project already?
    • Impact: To what degree will the stakeholder be impacted? Will this significantly change how they do their job?
    • Support: Is the stakeholder a supporter of the project? Neutral? A resister?
  • Map each stakeholder to an area on the power map on the next slide based on his or her level of power and involvement.
  • Vary the size of the circle to distinguish stakeholders that are highly impacted by the ACE from those who are not. Color each circle to show each stakeholder’s estimated or gauged level of support for the project.
  • Prioritize your ACE stakeholders (continued)

    1.1.4 1 Hour

    The image shows a matrix on the left, and a legend on the right. The matrix is labelled with Involvement at the bottom, and Power on the left side, and has the upper left quadrant labelled Keep Satisfied, the upper right quadrant labelled Key players, the lower right quadrant labelled Keep informed, and the lower left quadrant labelled Minimal effort.

    Should your ACE be Centralized or Decentralized?

    An ACE can be organized differently depending on your organization’s specific needs and culture.

    The SAFe Model:©

    “For smaller enterprises, a single centralized [ACE] can balance speed with economies of scale. However, in larger enterprises—typically those with more than 500 – 1,000 practitioners—it’s useful to consider employing either a decentralized model or a hub-and-spoke model.”

    The image shows 3 models: centralized, represented by a single large circle; decentralized, represented by 5 smaller circles; and hub-and-spoke, represented by a central circle, connected to 5 surrounding circles.

    © Scaled Agile, Inc.

    The Spotify Model:

    Spotify avoids using an ACE and instead spreads agile practices using Squads, Tribes, Chapters, Guilds, etc.

    It can be a challenging model to adopt because it is constantly changing, and must be fundamentally supported by your organization’s culture. (Linders, Ben. “Don't Copy the Spotify Model.” InfoQ.com. 6 Oct. 2016.)

    Detailed analysis of The Spotify Model is out of scope for this Blueprint.

    The image shows the Spotify model, with two sections, each labelled Tribe, and members from within each Tribe gathered together in a section labelled Guild.

    Activity: Select a Centralized or Decentralized ACE Model

    1.1.5 30 minutes

    Input

    • Prioritized business objectives
    • Use Cases
    • Organization qualities

    Output

    • Centralized or decentralized ACE model

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers

    Participants

    • Agile leadership group
    1. Using your prioritized business objectives, your ACE use cases, your organization size, structure, and culture, brainstorm the relative pros and cons of a centralized vs decentralized ACE model.
    2. Consider this: to improve understanding and acceptance, ask participants who prefer a centralized model to brainstorm the pros and cons of a decentralized model, and vice-versa.
    3. Collectively decide whether your ACE should be centralized, decentralized or hub-and-spoke and document it.
    Centralized ACE Decentralized ACE
    Pros Cons Pros Cons
    Centralize Vs De-centralize Considerations Prioritized Business Objectives
    • Neutral (objectives don’t favor either model)
    • Neutral (objectives don’t favor either model)
    ACE Use Cases
    • Neutral (use cases don’t favor either model)
    • Neutral (use cases don’t favor either model)
    Organization Size
    • Org. is small enough for centralized ACE
    • Overkill for a small org. like ours
    Organization Structure
    • All development done in one location
    • Not all locations do development
    Organization Culture
    • All development done in one location
    • Decentralized ACE may have yield more buy-in

    SELECTED MODEL: Centralized ACE

    Activity: Staff your ACE strategically

    1.1.6 1 Hour

    Input

    • List of potential ACE staff

    Output

    • Rated list of ACE staff

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers

    Participants

    • Agile leadership group
    1. Identify your list of potential ACE staff (this may be a combination of full time and contract staff).
    2. Add/modify/delete the rating criteria to meet your specific needs.
    3. Discuss and adjust the relative weightings of the rating criteria to best suit your organization’s needs.
    4. Rate each potential staff member and compare results to determine the best suited staff for your ACE.
    Candidate: Jane Doe
    Rating Criteria Criteria Weighting Candidate's Score (1-5)
    Candidate has strong theoretical knowledge of Agile. 8% 4
    Candidate has strong hands on experience with Agile. 18% 5
    Candidate has strong hands on experience with Agile. 10% 4
    Candidate is highly respected by the Agile teams. 18% 5
    Candidate is seen as a thought leader in the organization. 18% 5
    Candidate is seen as a change agent in the organization. 18% 5
    Candidate has strong desire to be member of ACE staff. 10% 3
    Total Weighted Score 4.6

    Phase 1, Step 2: Define the service offerings of your ACE

    Phase 1

    1.1 Determine the vision of your ACE

    1.2 Define the service offerings of your ACE

    Phase 2

    2.1 Define an adoption plan for your Agile teams

    2.2 Create an ACE engagement plan

    2.3 Define metrics to measure success

    Phase 3

    3.1 Optimize the success of your ACE

    3.2 Plan change to enhance your Agile initiatives

    3.3 Conduct ongoing retrospectives of your ACE

    Activities:

    1.2.1 Form the Center of Excellence.

    1.2.2 Gather and document your existing Agile practices for the CoE.

    1.2.3 Interview stakeholders to align ACE requirements with functional expectations.

    1.2.4 Form a solution matrix to organize your pain points and opportunities.

    1.2.5 Refine your use cases to identify your ACE functions and services.

    1.2.6 Visualize your ACE functions and service offerings with a capability map.

    Outcomes:

    • Collect data regarding the functional expectations of the Agile teams.
    • Refine your business-aligned use cases with your collected data to achieve both business and functional alignment.
    • Create a capability map that visualizes and prioritizes your key service offerings.

    Structure your ACE with representation from all of your key stakeholders

    Now that you have a prioritized list of stakeholders, use their influence to position the ACE to ensure maximum representation with minimal bottlenecks.

    By operating within a group of your key players, you can legitimize your Center of Excellence by propagating the needs and interests of those who interface and evangelize the CoE within the larger organization.

    The group of key stakeholders will extend the business alignment you achieved earlier by refining your service offerings to meet the needs of the ACEs customers. Multiple representations at the table will generate a wide arrangement of valuable insights and perspectives.

    Info-Tech Insight

    While holistic representation is necessary, ensure that the list is not too comprehensive and will not lead to progress roadblocks. The goal is to ensure that all factors relevant to the organization are represented; too many conflicting opinions may create an obstruction moving forward.

    ACE

    • Executive Sponsors
    • Team Leads
    • Business Units

    Determine how you will fund your ACE

    Choose the ACE funding model which is most aligned to your current system based on the scenarios provided below. Both models will offer the necessary support to ensure the success of your Agile program going forward.

    Funding Model Funding Scenario I Funding Scenario II
    Funded by the CIO Funded by the CIO office and a stated item within the general IT budget. Charged back to supported functional groups with all costs allocated to each functional group’s budget.
    Funded by the PMO Charged back to supported functional groups with all costs allocated to each functional group’s budget. Charged back to supported functional groups with all costs allocated to each functional group’s budget.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Your funding model may add additional key influencers into the mix. After you choose your funding model, ensure that you review your stakeholder map and add anyone who will have a direct impact in the viability and stability of your ACE.

    Determine how you will govern your ACE

    An Agile Center of Excellence is unique in the way you must govern the actions of its customers. Enable “flexible governance” to ensure that Agile teams have the ability to locally optimize and innovate while still operating within expected boundaries.

    ACE Governing Body

    ↑ Agile Team → ACE ← Agile Team ↑

    Who should take on the governance role?

    The governing body can be the existing executive or standing committees, or a newly formed committee involving your key ACE influencers and stakeholders.

    Flexible governance means that your ACE set boundaries based on your cultural, regulatory, and compliance requirements, and your governance group monitors your Agile teams’ adherence to these boundaries.

    Governing Body Responsibilities

    • Review and approve ACE strategy annually and ensure that it is aligned with current business strategy.
    • Provide detailed quality information for board members.
    • Ensure that the ACE is adequately resourced and that the organization has the capacity to deliver the service offerings.
    • Assure that the ACE is delivering benefits and achieving targets.
    • Assure that the record keeping and reporting systems are capable of providing the information needed to properly assess the quality of service.

    Modify your resourcing strategy based on organizational need

    Your Agile Center of Excellence can be organized either in a dedicated or a virtual configuration, depending on your company’s organizational structure and complexity.

    There is no right answer to how your Center of Excellence should be resourced. Consider your existing organizational structure and culture, the quality of relationships between functional groups, and the typical budgetary factors that would weigh on choosing between a virtual and dedicated CoE structure.

    COE Advantages Disadvantages
    Virtual
    • No change in organization structure required, just additional task delegation to your Agile manager or program manager.
    • Less effort and cost to implement.
    • Investment in quality is proportional to return.
    • Resources are shared between practice areas, and initiatives will take longer to implement.
    • Development and enhancement of best practices can become difficult without a centralized knowledge repository.
    Dedicated
    • Demonstrates a commitment to the ACEs long-term existence.
    • Allows for dedicated maintenance of best practices.
    • Clear lines of accountability for Agile processes.
    • Ability to develop highly skilled employees as their responsibilities are not shared.
    • Requires dedicated resources that can in turn be more costly.
    • Requires strong relationships with the functional groups that interface with the ACE.

    Staffing the ACE: Understand virtual versus dedicated ACE organizational models

    Virtual CoE

    The image shows an organizational chart titled Virtual CoE, with Head of IT at the top, then PMO and CoE Lead/Apps Director at the next level. The chart shows that there is crossover between the CoE Lead's reports, and the PMO's, indicated through dotted lines that connect them.

    • Responsibilities for CoE are split and distributed throughout departments on a part-time basis.
    • CoE members from the PMO report to apps director who also functions as the CoE lead on a part-time basis.

    The image shows a organizational chart titled Dedicated CoE, with all CoE members under the CoE.

    • Requires re-organization and dedicated full-time staff to run the CoE with clear lines of responsibility and accountability.
    • Hiring or developing highly skilled employees who have a sole function to facilitate and monitor quality best practices within the IT department may be necessary.

    Activity: Form the Center of Excellence

    1.2.1 1 Hour

    Input

    • N/A

    Output

    • ACE governance and resourcing plan

    Materials

    • Whiteboard

    Participants

    • Agile leadership group
    1. As a group, discuss if there is an existing body that would be able to govern the Center of Excellence. This body will monitor progress on an ongoing basis and assess any change requests that would impact the CoEs operation or goals.
    • List current governing bodies that are closely aligned with your current Agile environment and determine if the group could take on additional responsibilities.
    • Alternatively, identify individuals who could form a new ACE governing body.
  • Using the results of Exercise 1.1.6 in Step 1, select the individuals who will participate in the Center of Excellence. As a rough rule of thumb for sizing, an ACE staffed with 3-5 people can support 8-12 Agile Teams.
  • Document results in the ACE Communications Deck.

    Leverage your existing Agile practices and SMEs when establishing the ACE

    The synergy between Agile and CoE relies on its ability to build on existing best practices. Agile cannot grow without a solid foundation. ACE gives you the way to disseminate these practices and facilitate knowledge transfer from a centralized sharing environment. As part of defining your service offerings, engage with stakeholders across the organization to evaluate what is already documented so that it can be accommodated in the ACE.

    Documentation

    • Are there any existing templates that can be leveraged (e.g. resource planning, sprint planning)?
    • Are there any existing process documents that can be leveraged (e.g. SIPOC, program frameworks)?
    • Are there any existing standards documents the CoE can incorporate (e.g. policies, procedures, guidelines)?

    SMEs

    • Interview existing subject-matter experts that can give you an idea of your current pains and opportunities.
    • You already have feedback from those in your workshop group, so think about the rest of the organization:
      • Agile practitioners
      • Business stakeholders
      • Operations
      • Any other parties not represented in the workshop group

    Metrics

    • What are the current metrics being used to measure the success of Agile teams?
    • What metrics are currently being used to measure the completion of business objectives?
    • What tools or mediums are currently used for recording and communicating metrics?

    Info-Tech Insight

    When considering existing practices, it is important to evaluate the level of adherence to these practices. If they have been efficiently utilized, injecting them into ACE becomes an obvious decision. If they have been underutilized, however, it is important to understand why this occurred and discuss how you can drive higher adherence.

    Examples of existing documents to leverage

    People

    • Agile onboarding planning documents
    • Agile training documents
    • Organizational Agile manifesto
    • Team performance metrics dashboard
    • Stakeholder engagement and communication plan
    • Development team engagement plan
    • Organizational design and structure
    • Roles and responsibilities chart (i.e. RACI)
    • Compensation plan Resourcing plan

    Process

    • Tailored Scrum process
    • Requirements gathering process
    • Quality stage-gate checklist (including definitions of ready and done)
    • Business requirements document
    • Use case document
    • Business process diagrams
    • Entity relationship diagrams
    • Data flow diagrams
    • Solution or system architecture
    • Application documentation for deployment
    • Organizational and user change management plan
    • Disaster recovery and rollback process
    • Test case templates

    Technology

    • Code review policies and procedures
    • Systems design policies
    • Build, test, deploy, and rollback scripts
    • Coding guidelines
    • Data governance and management policies
    • Data definition and glossary
    • Request for proposals (RFPs)
    • Development tool standards and licensing agreements
    • Permission to development, testing, staging, and production environments
    • Application, system, and data integration policies

    Build upon the lessons learned from your Agile pilots

    The success of your Center of Excellence relies on the ability to build sound best practices within your organization’s context. Use your previous lessons learned and growing pains as shared knowledge of past Agile implementations within the ACE.

    Implement Agile Practices That Work

    Draw on the experiences of your initial pilot where you learned how to adapt the Agile manifesto and practices to your specific context. These lessons will help onboard new teams to Agile since they will likely experience some of the same challenges.

    Download

    Documents for review include:

    • Tailored Scrum Process
    • Agile Pilot Metrics
    • Info-Tech’s Agile Pilot Playbook

    Enable Organization-Wide Collaboration by Scaling Agile

    Draw on previous scaling Agile experiences to help understand how to interface, facilitate, and orchestrate cross-functional teams and stakeholders for large and complex projects. These lessons will help your ACE teams develop collaboration and problem-solving techniques involving roles with different priorities and lines of thinking.

    Download

    Documents for review include:

    • Agile Program Framework
    • Agile Pilot Program Metrics
    • Scaled Agile Development Process
    • Info-Tech’s Scaling Agile Playbook

    Activity: Gather and document your existing Agile practices for the CoE

    1.2.2 Variable time commitment based on current documentation state

    Input

    • Existing practices

    Output

    • Practices categorized within operating model

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers
    • Sticky notes

    Participants

    • ACE team
    1. Compile a list of existing practices that will be shared by the Center of Excellence. Consider any documents, templates, or tools that are used regularly by Agile teams.
    2. Evaluate the level of adherence to use of the practices (whether the practice is complied with regularly or not) with a high, medium, or low. Low compliance will need a root-cause analysis to understand why and how to remedy the situation.
    3. Determine the best fit for each practice under the ACE operational model.
    Name Type Adherence Level CoE Best Fit Source
    1 Tailored Scrum process Process High Shared Services Internal Wiki
    2
    3

    Activity: Interview stakeholders to understand the ACE functional expectations

    1.2.3 30-60 Minutes per interview

    Interview Stakeholders (from both Agile teams and functional areas) on their needs from the ACE. Ensure you capture both pain points and opportunities. Capture these as either Common Agile needs or Functional needs. Document using the tables below:

    Common Agile Needs
    Common Agile Needs
    • Each Agile Team interprets Agile differently
    • Need common approach to Agile with a proven track record within the organization
    • Making sure all Team members have a good understanding of Agile
    • Common set of tool(s) with a proven track record, along with a strong understanding of how to use the tool(s) efficiently and effectively
    • Help troubleshooting process related questions
    • Assistance with addressing the individual short comings of each Agile Team
    • Determining what sort of help each Agile Team needs most
    • Better understanding of the role played by Scrum Master and associated good practices
    • When and how do security/privacy/regulatory requirements get incorporated into Agile projects
    Functional Needs Ent Arch Needs
    • How do we ensure Ent Arch has insight and influence on Agile software design
    • Better understanding of Agile process
    • How to measure compliance with reference architectures

    PMO Needs

    • Better understanding of Agile process
    • Understanding role of PM in Agile
    • Project status reports that determine current level of project risk
    • How does project governance apply on Agile projects
    • What deliverables/artifacts are produced by Agile projects and when are they completed

    Operations Needs

    • Alignment on approaches for doing releases
    • Impact of Agile on change management and support desk processes
    • How and when will installation and operation instructions be available in Agile

    Activity: Form a solution matrix to organize your pain points and opportunities

    1.2.4 Half day

    Input

    • Identified requirements

    Output

    • Classified pains and opportunities

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers
    • Sticky notes

    Participants

    • ACE team
    1. Review the listed pain points from the data gathering process. Sort the pain points on sticky notes into technology, governance, people, and shared services.
    2. Consider opportunities under each defining element based on the identified business requirements.
    3. Document your findings.
    4. Discuss the results with the project team and prioritize the opportunities.
      • Where do the most pains occur?
      • What opportunities exist to alleviate pains?
    Governance Shared Services Technology People
    Pain Points
    Opportunities

    Document results in the ACE Communications Deck.

    Activity: Refine your use cases to identify your ACE functions and services

    1.2.5 1 Hour

    Input

    • Use cases from activity 1.1.2

    Output

    • Refined use cases based on data collection

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers
    • Sticky notes

    Participants

    • ACE team
    1. Refine your initial use cases for the points of alignment between your ACE and business objectives using your classified pain points and opportunities.
    2. Add use cases to address newly realized pain points.
    3. Determine the functions and services the CoE can offer to address the identified requirements.
    4. Evaluate the outputs in the form of realized benefits and extracted inefficiencies.

    Possible ACE use cases:

    • Policy Management
    • Change Management
    • Risk Management
    • Stakeholder Management
    • Engagement Planning
    • Knowledge Management
    • Subject-Matter Expertise
    • Agile Team Evaluation
    • Operations Support
    • Onboarding
    • Coaching
    • Learning Facilitation
    • Communications Training
    • Vendor Management
    • Application Support
    • Tooling Standards

    Document results in the ACE Communications Deck.

    Activity: Visualize your ACE functions and service offerings with a capability map

    1.2.6 1 Hour

    Input

    • Use cases from activity 1.2.4

    Output

    • ACE capability map

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers
    • Sticky notes

    Participants

    • ACE team
    1. Review the refined and categorized list of service offerings.
    2. Determine how these new capabilities will add, remove, or enhance your existing service and capabilities.
    3. Categorize the capabilities into the following groups:
    • Governance and Metrics
    • Services
    • Staff
    • Technology
  • Label the estimated impact of the service offering based on your business priorities for the year. This will guide your strategy for implementing your Agile Center of Excellence moving forward.
  • Document results in the ACE Communications Deck.

    Activity: Visualize your ACE functions and service offerings with a capability map (continued)

    Governance

    Policy Management (Medium Potential)

    Change Management (High Potential)

    Risk Management (High Potential)

    Stakeholder Management (High Potential)

    Metrics/Feedback Monitoring (High Potential)

    Shared Services

    Engagement Planning (High Potential)

    Knowledge Management (High Potential)

    Subject-Matter Expertise (High Potential)

    Agile Team Evaluation (High Potential)

    Operations Support (High Potential)

    People

    Onboarding (Medium Potential)

    Coaching (High Potential)

    Learning Facilitation (High Potential)

    Internal Certification Program (Low Potential)

    Communications Training (Medium Potential)

    Technology

    Vendor Management (Medium Potential)

    Application Support (Low Potential)

    Tooling Standards (High Potential)

    Checkpoint: Are you ready to standardize your CoEs service offerings?

    Phase 1

    1.1 Determine the vision of your ACE

    1.2 Define the service offerings of your ACE

    Phase 2

    2.1 Define an adoption plan for your Agile teams

    2.2 Create an ACE engagement plan

    2.3 Define metrics to measure success

    Self-Auditing Guidelines

    • Have you identified and prioritized the key business objectives for the upcoming year that the ACE will align with?
    • Do you have a high-level set of use cases for points of alignment between your ACE and business objectives?
    • Have you mapped your stakeholders and identified the key players that will have an influence over the future success of your ACE?
    • Have you identified how your organization will fund, resource, and govern the ACE?
    • Have you collected data to understand the functional expectations of the users the ACE is intended to serve?
    • Have you refined your use cases to align with both business objectives and functional expectations?

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech’s historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    1.1.2 Identify and prioritize organizational business objectives

    Our analyst team will help you organize and prioritize your business objectives for the year in order to ensure that the service offerings the ACE offers are delivering consistent business value.

    1.1.3 Form use cases for the points of alignment between your ACE and business objectives

    Our analyst team will help you turn your prioritized business objectives into a set of high-level use cases that will provide the foundation for defining user-aligned services.

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    1.1.4 Prioritize your ACE stakeholders

    Our analysts will walk you through an exercise of mapping and prioritizing your Centers of Excellence stakeholders based on impact and power within so you can ensure appropriate presentation of interests within the organization.

    1.2.4 Form a solution matrix to organize your pain points and opportunities

    Our analyst team will help you solidify the direction of your Center of Excellence by overlaying your identified needs, pain points, and potential opportunities in a matrix guided by Info-Tech’s CoE operating model.

    1.2.5 Refine your use cases to identify your ACE functions and services

    Our analyst team will help you further refine your business-aligned use cases with the functional expectations from your Agile teams and stakeholders, ensuring the ACEs long-term utility.

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    1.2.6 Visualize your ACE functions and service offerings with a capability map

    Our analysts will walk you through creating your Agile Centers of Excellence capability map and help you to prioritize which service offerings are critical to the success of your Agile teams in meeting their objectives.

    Phase 2

    Standardize the Centers of Excellence Service Offerings

    Spread Best Practices With an Agile Center of Excellence

    The ACE needs to ensure consistency in service delivery

    Now that you have aligned the CoE to the business and functional expectations, you need to ensure its service offerings are consistently accessible. To effectively ensure accessibility and delegation of shared services in an efficient way, the CoE needs to have a consistent framework to deliver its services.

    Phase 1 - Strategically Align the CoE

    Create strategic alignment between the CoE and the organization’s goals, objectives, and vision. This alignment translates into the CoE mandate intended to enhance the way Agile will enable teams to meet business objectives.

    Phase 2 - Standardize the CoEs Service Offerings

    Build an engagement plan based on a standardized adoption model to ensure your CoE service offerings are accessible and consistent across the organization. Create and consolidate key performance indicators to measure the CoEs utility and whether or not the expected value is being translated to tangible results.

    Phase 3 - Operate the CoE

    Operate the CoE to provide service offerings to Agile teams, identify improvements to optimize the function of your Agile teams, and effectively manage and communicate change so that teams can grow within the Agile adoption model and optimize value delivery both within your Agile environment and across functions.

    Phase 2 outline

    Call 1-888-670-8889 or email GuidedImplementations@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Complete these steps on your own, or call us to complete a guided implementation. A guided implementation is a series of 2-3 advisory calls that help you execute each phase of a project. They are included in most advisory memberships.

    Guided Implementation 2: Standardize the CoEs Service Offerings

    Proposed Time to Completion (in weeks): 2

    Step 2.1: Define an adoption plan for your Agile teams

    Start with an analyst kick off call:

    • Dissect the key attributes of Agile adoption.

    Then complete these activities…

    2.1.1 Further categorize your use cases within the Agile adoption model.

    Step 2.2: Create an ACE engagement plan

    Start with an analyst kick off call:

    • Form engagement plans for your Agile teams.

    Then complete these activities…

    2.2.1 Create an engagement plan for each level of adoption.

    Step 2.3: Define metrics to measure success

    Finalize phase deliverable:

    • Discuss effective ACE metrics.

    Then complete these activities…

    2.3.1 Collect existing team-level metrics.

    2.3.2 Define metrics that align with your Agile business objectives.

    2.3.3 Define target ACE performance metrics.

    2.3.4 Define Agile adoption metrics.

    2.3.5 Consolidate metrics for stakeholder impact.

    2.3.6 Use Info-Tech’s ACE Benefits Tracking Tool to monitor, evaluate, refine, and ensure continued business value.

    Phase 2 Results & Insights:

    • Standardizing your service offerings allows you to have direct influence on the dissemination of best practices.

    Phase 2, Step 1: Define an adoption plan for your Agile teams

    Phase 1

    1.1 Determine the vision of your ACE

    1.2 Define the service offerings of your ACE

    Phase 2

    2.1 Define an adoption plan for your Agile teams

    2.2 Create an ACE engagement plan

    2.3 Define metrics to measure success

    Phase 3

    3.1 Optimize the success of your ACE

    3.2 Plan change to enhance your Agile initiatives

    3.3 Conduct ongoing retrospectives of your ACE

    Activities:

    2.1.1 Further categorize your use cases within the Agile adoption model.

    Outcomes:

    • Refine your previously determined use cases within the Agile adoption model to ensure that teams can be assisted at any level of Agile adoption.
    • Understand the key attributes of Agile adoption and how they impact success.

    Understand the implementation challenges that the ACE may face

    Culture clash between ACE and larger organization

    It is important to carefully consider the compatibility between the current organizational culture and Agile moving forward. Agile compels empowered teams, meritocracy, and broad collaboration for success; while typical organizational structures are siloed and hierarchical and decisions are delegated from the top down.

    This is not to say that the culture of the ACE has to match the larger organizational culture; part of the overarching aim of the ACE is to evolve the current organizational culture for the better. The point is to ensure you enable a smooth transition with sufficient management support and a team of Agile champions.

    The changing role of middle management

    Very similar to the culture clash challenge, cultural rigidity in how middle managers operate (performance review, human resource management, etc.) can cause cultural rejection. They need to become enablers for high performance and give their teams the sufficient tools, skills, and opportunities to succeed and excel.

    What impedes Agile adoption?

    Based on a global survey of Agile practitioners (N=1,319)*:

    52% Organizational culture at odds with agile values

    44% Inadequate management support and sponsorship

    48% General organization resistance to change

    *Respondents were able to make multiple selections

    (13th Annual State of Agile Report, VersionOne, 2019)

    Build competency and trust through a structured Agile adoption plan

    The reality of cultural incompatibility between Agile and traditional organization structures necessitates a structured adoption plan. Systematically build competency so teams can consistently achieve project success and solidify trust in your teams’ ability to meet business needs with Agile.

    By incrementally gaining the trust of management as you build up your Agile capabilities, you enable a smooth cultural transition to an environment where teams are empowered, adapt quickly to changing needs, and are trusted to innovate and make successes out of their failures.

    Optimized value delivery occurs when there is a direct relationship between competency and trust. There will be unrealized value when competency or trust outweigh the other. That value loss increases as either dimension of adoption continues to grow faster than the other.

    The image shows a graph with Competency on the x-axis and Trust on the y-axis. There are 3 sections: Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3, in subsequently larger arches in the background of the graph. The graph shows two diagonal arrows, the bottom one labelled Current Value Delivery and the top one labelled Optimized Value Delivery. The space between the two arrows is labelled Value Loss.

    Use Info-Tech’s Practice Adoption Optimization Model to systematically increase your teams’ ability to deliver

    Using Info-Tech’s Practice adoption optimization model will ensure you incrementally build competency and trust to optimize your value delivery.

    Agile adoption at its core, is about building social capital. Your level of trust with key influencers increases as you continuously enhance your capabilities, enabling the necessary cultural changes away from traditional organizational structures.

    Trust & Competency ↓

    DEFINE

    Begin to document your development workflow or value chain, implement a tracking system for KPIs, and start gathering metrics and reporting them transparently to the appropriate stakeholders.

    ITERATE

    Use collected metrics and retrospectives to stabilize team performance by reducing areas of variability in your workflow and increasing the consistency at which targets are met.

    COLLABORATE

    Use information to support changes and adopt appropriate practices to make incremental improvements to the existing environment.

    EMPOWER

    Drive behavioral and cultural changes that will empower teams to be accountable for their own success and learning.

    INNOVATE

    Use your built-up trust and support practice innovation, driving the definition and adoption of new practices.

    Review these key attributes of Agile adoption

    Agile adoption is unique to every organization. Consider these key attributes within your own organizational context when thinking about levels of Agile adoption.

    Adoption Attributes

    Team Organization

    Considers the degree to which teams are able to self-organize based on internal organizational structures (hierarchy vs. meritocracy) and inter-team capabilities.

    Team Coordination

    Considers the degree to which teams can coordinate, both within and across functions.

    Business Alignment

    Considers the degree to which teams can understand and/or map to business objectives.

    Coaching

    Considers what kind of coaching/training is offered and how accessible the training is.

    Empowerment

    Considers the degree to which teams are able and capable to address project, process, and technical challenges without significant burden from process controls and bureaucracy.

    Failure Tolerance

    Considers the degree to which stakeholders are risk tolerant and if teams are capable of turning failures into learning outcomes.

    Why are these important?

    These key attributes function as qualities or characteristics that, when improved, will successively increase the degree to which the business trusts your Agile teams’ ability to meet their objectives.

    Systematically improving these attributes as you graduate levels of the adoption model allows the business to acclimatize to the increased capability the Agile team is offering, and the risk of culture clash with the larger organization decreases.

    Start to consider at what level of adoption each of your service offerings become useful. This will allow you to standardize the way your Agile teams interact with the CoE.

    Activity: Further categorize your use cases within the Agile adoption model

    2.1.1 1.5 Hours

    Input

    • List of service offerings

    Output

    • Service offerings categorized within adoption model

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers
    • Sticky notes

    Participants

    • Team
    1. Gather the list of your categorized use cases.
    2. Based on Info-Tech’s Agile adoption model, categorize which use cases would be useful to help the Agile team graduate to the next level of adoption.
      • Conceptualize: Begin to document your workflow or value chain, implement a tracking system for KPIs, and gather metrics and report them transparently to the appropriate stakeholders.
      • Iterate: Use collected metrics to stabilize team performance by reducing areas of variability in your workflow and increasing the consistency at which targets are met.
      • Collaborate: Use information to drive changes and adopt appropriate Agile practices to make incremental improvements to the existing environment.
      • Empower: Drive behavioral and cultural changes that will empower teams to be accountable for their own successes given the appropriate resources.
      • Innovate: Use your built-up trust to begin to make calculated risks and innovate more, driving new best practices into the CoE.

    The same service offering could be offered at different levels of adoption. In these cases, you will need to re-visit the use case and differentiate how the service (if at all) will be delivered at different levels of adoption.

    1. Use this opportunity to brainstorm alternative or new use cases for any gaps identified. It is the CoEs goal to assist teams at every level of adoption to meet their business objectives. Use a different colored sticky note for these so you can re-visit and map out their inputs, outputs, metrics, etc.

    Activity: Further categorize your use cases within the Agile adoption model (continued)

    2.1.1 1.5 Hours

    Input

    • List of service offerings

    Output

    • Service offerings categorized within adoption model

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers
    • Sticky notes

    Participants

    • Team

    Example:

    Service Offerings
    Level 5: Innovate
    Level 4: Empower
    Level 3: Collaborate Coaching -- Communications Training
    Level 2: Iterate Tooling Standards
    Level 1: Conceptualize

    Learning Facilitation

    Draw on the service offerings identified in activity 1.2.4

    Phase 2, Step 2: Create an ACE engagement plan

    Phase 1

    1.1 Determine the vision of your ACE

    1.2 Define the service offerings of your ACE

    Phase 2

    2.1 Define an adoption plan for your Agile teams

    2.2 Create an ACE engagement plan

    2.3 Define metrics to measure success

    Phase 3

    3.1 Optimize the success of your ACE

    3.2 Plan change to enhance your Agile initiatives

    3.3 Conduct ongoing retrospectives of your ACE

    Activities:

    2.2.1 Create an engagement plan for each level of adoption.

    Outcomes:

    • Understand the importance of aligning with the functional expectations of your ACE customers.
    • Understand the relationship between engagement and continuous improvement.
    • Create an engagement plan for each level of adoption to standardize the way customers interact with the ACE.

    Enable Agile teams to interface with ACE service offerings to meet their business objectives

    A Center of Excellence aligned with your service offerings is only valuable if your CoEs customers can effectively access those services. At this stage, you have invested in ensuring that your CoE aligns to your business objectives and that your service offerings align to its customers. Now you need to ensure that these services are accessible in the day-to-day operation of your Agile teams.

    Engagement Process → Service Offering

    Use backwards induction from your delivery method to the service offering. This is an effective method to determine the optimal engagement action for the CoE, as it considers the end customer as the driver for best action for every possible situation.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Your engagement process should be largely informed by your ACE users. Teams have constraints as well as in-the-trenches concerns and issues. If your service offerings don’t account for these, it can lead to rejection of the culture you are trying to inspire.

    Show the way, do not dictate

    Do not fix problems for your Agile teams, give them the tools and knowledge to fix the problems themselves.

    Facilitate learning to drive success

    A primary function of your ACE is to transfer knowledge to Agile teams to increase their capability to achieve desired outcomes.

    While this can take the form of coaching, training sessions, libraries, and wikis, a critical component of ACE is creating interactions where individuals from Agile teams can come together and share their knowledge.

    Ideas come from different experiences. By creating communities of practice (CoP) around topics that the ACE is tasked with supporting (e.g. Agile business analysts), you foster social learning and decrease the likelihood that change will result in some sort of cultural rejection.

    Consider whether creating CoPs would be beneficial in your organization’s context.

    "Communities of practice are a practical way to frame the task of managing knowledge. They provide a concrete organizational infrastructure for realizing the dream of a learning organization." – Etienne Wenger, Digital Habitats: Stewarding technology for communities

    A lack of top-down support will result in your ACE being underutilized

    Top-down support is critical to validate the CoE to its customers and ensure they feel compelled to engage with its services. Relevancy is a real concern for the long-term viability of a CoE and championing its use from a position of authority will legitimize its function and deter its fading from relevancy of day-to-day use for Agile teams.

    Although you are aligning your engagement processes to the customers of your Agile Center of Excellence, you still need your key influencers to champion its lasting organizational relevancy. Don’t let your employees think the ACE is just a coordinating body or a committee that is convenient but non-essential – make sure they know that it drives their own personal growth and makes everyone better as a collective.

    "Even if a CoE is positioned to meet a real organizational need, without some measure of top-down support, it faces an uphill battle to remain relevant and avoid becoming simply one more committee in the eyes of the wider organization. Support from the highest levels of the organization help fight the tendency of the larger organization to view the CoE as a committee with no teeth and tip the scales toward relevancy for the CoE." – Joe Shepley, VP and Practice Lead, Doculabs

    Info-Tech Insight

    Stimulate top-down support with internal certifications. This allows your employees to gain accreditation while at the same time encouraging top-down support and creating a compliance check for the continual delivery and acknowledgement of your evolving best practices.

    Ensure that best practices and lessons learned are injected back into the ACE

    For your employees to continuously improve, so must the Center of Excellence. Ensure the ACE has the appropriate mechanisms to absorb and disseminate best practices that emerge from knowledge transfer facilitation events.

    Facilitated Learning Session →Was the localized adaption well received by others in similar roles? →Document Localized Adaptation →Is there broad applicability and benefit to the proposed innovation? →CoE Absorbs as Best Practice

    Continuous improvement starts with the CoE

    While facilitating knowledge transfer is key, it is even more important that the Center of Excellence can take localized adaptations from Agile teams and standardize them as best practices when well received. If an individual were to leave without sharing their knowledge, the CoE and the larger organization will lose that knowledge and potential innovation opportunities.

    Experience matters

    To organically grow your ACE and be cost effective, you want your teams to continuously improve and to share that knowledge. As individual team members develop and climb the adoption model, they should participate as coaches and champions for less experienced groups so that their knowledge is reaching the widest audience possible.

    Case study: Agile learning at Spotify

    CASE STUDY

    Industry Digital Media

    Source Henrik Kniberg & Anders Ivarsson, 2012

    Methods of Agile learning at Spotify

    Spotify has continuously introduced innovative techniques to facilitate learning and ensure that that knowledge gets injected back into the organization. Some examples are the following:

    • Hack days: Self-organizing teams, referred to as squads, come together, try new ideas, and share them with their co-workers. This facilitates a way to stay up to date with new tools and techniques and land new product innovations.
    • Coaching: Every squad has access to an Agile coach to help inject best practices into their workflow – coaches run retrospectives, sprint planning meetings, facilitate one-on-one coaching, etc.
    • Tribes: Collections of squads that hold regular gatherings to show the rest of the tribe what they’ve been working on so others can learn from what they are doing.
    • Chapters: People with similar skills within a tribe come together to discuss their area of expertise and their specific challenges.
    • Guilds: A wide-reaching community of interest where members from different tribes can come together to share knowledge, tools, and codes, and practice (e.g. a tester guild, an Agile coaching guild).

    The image shows the Spotify model, with two sections, each labelled Tribe, and members from within each Tribe gathered together in a section labelled Guild.

    "As an example of guild work, we recently had a ‘Web Guild Unconference,’ an open space event where all web developers at Spotify gathered up in Stockholm to discuss challenges and solutions within their field."

    Activity: Create an engagement plan for each level of adoption

    2.2.1 30 Minutes per role

    Input

    • Categorized use cases

    Output

    • Role-based engagement plans

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers
    • Sticky notes

    Participants

    • Team
    1. On the top bar, define the role you are developing the engagement plan for. This will give you the ability to standardize service delivery across all individuals in similar roles.
    2. Import your categorized service offerings for each level of adoption that you think are applicable to the given role.
    3. Using backwards induction, determine the engagement processes that will ensure that those service offerings are accessible and fit the day-to-day operations of the role.
    4. Fill in the template available on the next slide with each role’s engagement plan.

    Document results in the ACE Communications Deck.

    Example engagement plan: Developer

    2.2.1 30 Minutes per role

    Role: Developer
    Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
    Service Offering
    1. Onboarding
    2. Coaching
    3. Learning Facilitation
    1. Tooling Standards
    2. Learning Facilitation
    1. Communications Training
    2. Learning Facilitation
    1. Subject-Matter Expertise
    2. Coaching
    1. Knowledge Management
    Engagement Process
    1. Based on service request or need identified by dev. manager.
    2. Based on service request or need identified by dev. manager.
    3. Weekly mandatory community of practice meetings.
    1. When determined to have graduated to level 2, receive standard Agile tooling standards training.
    2. Weekly mandatory community of practice meetings.
    1. When determined to have graduated to level 3, receive standard Agile communications training.
    2. Weekly mandatory community of practice meetings
    1. Peer-based training on how to effectively self-organize.
    2. Based on service request or need identified by dev. manager.
    1. Review captured key learnings from last and have CoE review KPIs related to any area changed.

    Example engagement plan: Tester

    2.2.1 30 Minutes per role

    Role: Tester
    Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5
    Service Offering
    1. Onboarding
    2. Coaching
    1. Product Training
    2. Communications Training
    1. Communications Training
    2. Learning Facilitation
    1. Subject-Matter Expertise
    2. Coaching
    1. Tooling Standards
    2. Training
    3. Coaching
    Engagement Process
    1. Based on service request or need identified by dev. manager.
    1. Weekly mandatory community of practice meetings.
    2. Provide training on effective methods for communicating with development teams based on organizational best practices.
    1. When determined to have graduated to level 3, receive standard training based on organizational testing best practices. Weekly mandatory community of practice meetings.
    1. Peer-to-peer training with level 5 certified coach.
    2. Based on service request or need identified by dev. manager. .
    1. Periodic updates of organizational tooling standards based on community of practice results.
    2. Automation training.
    3. Provide coaching to level 1 developers on a rotating basis to develop facilitation skills.

    Example engagement plan: Product Owner

    2.2.1 30 Minutes per role

    Role: Product Owner
    Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
    Service Offering
    1. Onboarding
    2. Coaching
    1. Coaching
    2. Learning Facilitation
    1. Coaching
    2. Communications Training
    3. Learning Facilitation
    1. Coaching
    2. Learning Facilitation
    1. Coaching
    2. Learning Facilitation
    Engagement Process
    1. Provide onboarding materials for Agile product owners.
    2. Provide bi-weekly reviews and subsequent guidance at the end of retrospective processes.
    1. Provide monthly reviews and subsequent guidance based on retrospective results.
    2. Bi-weekly mandatory community of practice meetings
    1. When determined to have graduated to level 3, receive standard training based on organizational testing best practices.
    2. Bi-weekly mandatory community of practice meetings.
    1. Provide monthly reviews and subsequent guidance based on retrospective results.
    2. Bi-weekly mandatory community of practice meetings
    1. Provide quarterly reviews and subsequent guidance based on retrospective results.
    2. Bi-weekly mandatory community of practice meetings

    Phase 2, Step 3: Define metrics to measure success

    Phase 1

    1.1 Determine the vision of your ACE

    1.2 Define the service offerings of your ACE

    Phase 2

    2.1 Define an adoption plan for your Agile teams

    2.2 Create an ACE engagement plan

    2.3 Define metrics to measure success

    Phase 3

    3.1 Optimize the success of your ACE

    3.2 Plan change to enhance your Agile initiatives

    3.3 Conduct ongoing retrospectives of your ACE

    Activities:

    2.3.1 Define existing team-level metrics.

    2.3.2 Define metrics that align with your Agile business objectives.

    2.3.3 Define target ACE performance metrics.

    2.3.4 Define Agile adoption metrics.

    2.3.5 Consolidate your metrics for stakeholder impact.

    2.3.6 Use Info-Tech’s ACE Benefits Tracking Tool to monitor, evaluate, refine, and ensure continued business value.

    Outcomes:

    • Understand the importance of aligning with the functional expectations of your ACE customers.
    • Understand the relationship between engagement and continuous improvement.
    • Create an engagement plan for each level of adoption to standardize the way customers interact with the ACE.

    Craft metrics that will measure the success of your Agile teams

    Quantify measures that demonstrate the effectiveness of your ACE by establishing distinct metrics for each of your service offerings. This will ensure that you have full transparency over the outputs of your CoE and that your service offerings maintain relevance and are utilized.

    Questions to Ask

    1. What are leading indicators of improvements that directly affect the mandate of the CoE?
    2. How do you measure process efficiency and effectiveness?

    Creating meaningful metrics

    Specific

    Measureable

    Achievable

    Realistic

    Time-bound

    Follow the SMART framework when developing metrics for each service offering.

    Adhering to this methodology is a key component of the lean management methodology. This framework will help you avoid establishing general metrics that aren’t relevant.

    "It’s not about telling people what they are doing wrong. It’s about constantly steering everyone on the team in the direction of success, and never letting any individual compromise the progress of the team toward success." – Mary Poppendieck, qtd. in “Questioning Servant Leadership”

    For important advice on how to avoid the many risks associated with metrics, refer to Info-Tech’s Select and Use SDLC Metrics Effectively.

    Ensure your metrics are addressing criteria from different levels of stakeholders and enterprise context

    There will be a degree of overlap between the metrics from your business objectives, service offerings, and existing Agile teams. This is a positive thing. If a metric can speak to multiple benefits it is that much more powerful in commuting successes to your key stakeholders.

    Existing metrics

    Business objective metrics

    Service offering metrics

    Agile adoption metrics

    Finding points of overlap means that you have multiple stakeholders with a vested interest in the positive trend of a specific metric. These consolidated metrics will be fundamental for your CoE as they will help build consensus through communicating the success of the ACE in a common language for a diverse audience.

    Activity: Define existing team-level metrics

    2.3.1 1 Hour

    Input

    • Current metrics

    Output

    • Service offerings categorized within adoption model

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers
    • Sticky notes

    Participants

    • Team
    1. Gather any metrics related documentation that you collected during your requirements gathering in Phase 1.
    2. Collect team-level metrics for your existing Agile teams:
      • Examine outputs from any feedback mechanisms you have (satisfaction surveys, emails, existing SLAs, burndown charts, resourcing costs, licensing costs per sprint, etc.).
      • Look at historical trends and figures when available. Be careful of frequent anomalies as these may indicate a root cause that needs to be addressed.
      • Explore the definition of specific metrics across different functional teams to ensure consistency of measurement and reporting.
    Team Objective Expected Benefits Metrics
    Improve productivity
    • Improve transparency with business decisions
    • Team burndown and velocity
    • Number of releases per milestone
    Increase team morale and motivation
    • Teams are engaged and motivated to develop new opportunities to deliver more value quicker.
    • Team satisfaction with Agile environment
    • Degree of engagement in ceremonies
    Improve transparency with business decisions
    • Teams are engaged and motivated to develop new opportunities to deliver more value quicker.
    • Stakeholder satisfaction with completed product
    • Number of revisions to products in demonstrations

    Activity: Define metrics that align with your Agile business objectives

    2.3.2 1 Hour

    Input

    • Organizational business objectives from Phase 1

    Output

    • Metrics aligned to organizational business objectives

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers
    • Sticky notes

    Participants

    • ACE
    1. List the business objectives that you determined in 1.1.2.
    2. Create a shortlist of expected benefits from those business objectives. These will help to drive metrics that align with the intended purpose of completing those business objectives, and affirm they are aligned to realizable benefits.
    3. Define metrics that speak to the benefits of your business objectives. While engaging in this process, ensure to document the collection method for each metrics.
    Business Objectives Expected Benefits Metrics
    Decrease time-to-market of product releases
    • Faster feedback from customers.
    • Increased customer satisfaction.
    • Competitive advantage.
    Decrease time-to-market of product releases
    • Alignment to organizational best practices.
    • Improved team productivity.
    • Greater collaboration across functional teams.
    • Policy and practice adherence and acknowledgement
    • Number of requests for ACE services
    • Number of suggestions to improve Agile best practices and ACE operations

    Activity: Define target ACE performance metrics

    2.3.3 1 Hour

    Input

    • Service offerings
    • Satisfaction surveys
    • Usage rates

    Output

    • CoE performance metrics

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers
    • Sticky notes

    Participants

    • ACE
    1. Define metrics to measure the success of each of your service offerings.
    2. Create a shortlist of expected benefits from those business objectives. These will help to drive metrics that align with the intended purpose of those service offerings, and affirm they are aligned to realizable benefits.
    3. Define metrics that speak to the benefits of your service offerings.
    4. Compare these to your team performance metrics.
    Service Offering Expected Benefits Metrics
    Knowledge management
    • Comprehensive knowledgebase that accommodates various company products and office locations.
    • Easily accessible resources.
    • Number of practices extracted from ACE and utilized
    • Frequency of updates to knowledgebase
    Tooling standards
    • Tools adhere to company policies, security guidelines, and regulations.
    • Improved support of tools and technologies.
    • Tools integrate and function well with enterprise systems.
    • Number of teams and functional groups using standardized tools
    • Number of supported standardized tools
    • Number of new tools added to the standards list
    • Number of tools removed from standards list

    Activity: Define Agile adoption metrics

    2.3.4 1 Hour

    Input

    • Agile adoption model

    Output

    • Agile adoption metrics
    1. Define metrics to measure the success of each of your service offerings.
    2. Create a shortlist of expected benefits from those business objectives. These will help to drive metrics that align with the intended purpose of those service offerings, and affirm they are aligned to realizable benefits.
    3. Define metrics that speak to the benefits of your service offerings.
    4. It is possible that you will need to adjust these metrics after baselines are established when you begin to operate the ACE. Keep this in mind moving forward.
    Adoption attributes Expected Benefits Metrics
    Team organization
    • Acquisition of the appropriate roles and skills to successfully deliver products.
    • Degree of flexibility to adjust team compositions on a per project basis
    Team coordination
    • Ability to successfully undertake large and complex projects involving multiple functional groups.
    • Number of ceremonies involving teams across functional groups
    Business alignment
    • Increased delivery of business value from process optimizations.
    • Number of business-objective metrics surpassing targets
    Coaching
    • Teams are regularly trained with new and better best practices.
    • Number of coaching and training requests
    Empowerment
    • Teams can easily and quickly modify processes to improve productivity without following a formal, rigorous process.
    • Number of implemented changes from team retrospectives
    Failure tolerance
    • Stakeholders trust teams will adjust when failures occur during a project.
    • Degree of stakeholder trust to address project issues quickly and effectively

    Activity: Consolidate your metrics for stakeholder impact

    2.3.5 30 Minutes

    Input

    • New and existing Agile metrics

    Output

    • Consolidated Agile metrics

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers
    • Sticky notes

    Participants

    • ACE
    1. Take all the metrics defined from the previous activities and compare them as a group.
    2. If there are overlapping metrics that are measuring similar outcomes or providing similar benefits, see if there is a way to merge them together so that a single metric can report outcomes to multiple stakeholders. This reduces the amount of resources invested in metrics gathering and helps to show consensus or alignment between multiple stakeholder interests.
    3. Compare these to your existing Agile metrics, and explore ways to consolidate existing metrics that are established with some of your new metrics. Established metrics are trusted and if they can be continued it can be viewed as beneficial from a consensus and consistency perspective to your stakeholders.

    Activity: Use Info-Tech’s ACE Benefits Tracking Tool to monitor, evaluate, refine, and ensure continued business value

    2.3.6 1 Hour

    Purpose

    The CoE governance team can use this tool to take ownership of the project’s benefits, track progress, and act on any necessary changes to address gaps. In the long term, it can be used to identify whether the team is ahead, on track, or lagging in terms of benefits realization.

    Steps

    1. Enter your identified metrics from the following activities into the ACE Benefits Tracking Tool.
    2. Input your baselines from your data collection (Phase 3) and a goal value for each metric.
    3. Document the results at key intervals as defined by the tool.
    4. Use the summary report to identify metrics that are not tracking well for root cause analysis and communicate with key stakeholders the outcomes of your Agile Center of Excellence based on your communication schedule from Phase 3, Step 3.

    INFO-TECH DELIVERABLE

    Download the ACE Benefits Tracking Tool.

    Checkpoint: Are you ready to operate your ACE?

    Phase 2

    2.1 Define an adoption plan for your Agile teams

    2.2 Create an ACE engagement plan

    2.3 Define metrics to measure success

    Phase 3

    3.1 Optimize the success of your ACE

    3.2 Plan change to enhance your Agile initiatives

    3.3 Conduct ongoing retrospectives of your ACE

    Self Auditing Guidelines

    • Have you categorized your ACE service offerings within Info-Tech’s Agile adoption model?
    • Have you formalized engagement plans to standardize the access to your service offerings?
    • Do you understand the function of learning events and their criticality to the function of the ACE?
    • Do you understand the key attributes of Agile adoption and how social capital leads to optimized value delivery?
    • Have you defined metrics for different goals (adoption, effective service offerings, business objectives) of the ACE?
    • Do your defined metrics align to the SMART framework?

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech’s historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    2.1.1 Further categorize your use cases within the Agile adoption model

    Our analyst team will help you categorize the Centers of Excellence service offerings within Info-Tech’s Agile adoption model to help standardize the way your organization engages with the Center of Excellence.

    2.2.1 Create an engagement plan for each level of adoption

    Our analyst team will help you structure engagement plans for each role within your Agile environment to provide a standardized pathway to personal development and consistency in practice.

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    2.3.2 Define metrics that align with your Agile business objectives

    Our analysts will walk you through defining a set of metrics that align with your Agile business objectives identified in Phase 1 of the blueprint so the CoEs monitoring function can ensure ongoing alignment during operation.

    2.3.3 Define target ACE performance metrics

    Our analysts will walk you through defining a set of metrics that monitors how successful the ACE has been at providing its services so that business and IT stakeholders can ensure the effectiveness of the ACE.

    2.3.4 Define Agile adoption metrics

    Our analyst team will help you through defining a set of metrics that aligns with your organization’s fit of the Agile adoption model in order to provide a mechanism to track the progress of Agile teams maturing in capability and organizational trust.

    Phase 3

    Operationalize Your Agile Center of Excellence

    Spread Best Practices With an Agile Center of Excellence

    Operate your ACE to drive optimized value from your Agile teams

    The final step is to engage in monitoring of your metrics program to identify areas for improvement. Using metrics as a driver for operating your ACE will allow you to identify and effectively manage needed change, as well as provide you with the data necessary to promote outcomes to your stakeholders to ensure the long-term viability of the ACE within your organization.

    Phase 1 - Strategically Align the CoE

    Create strategic alignment between the CoE and the organization’s goals, objectives, and vision. This alignment translates into the CoE mandate intended to enhance the way Agile will enable teams to meet business objectives.

    Phase 2 - Standardize the CoEs Service Offerings

    Build an engagement plan based on a standardized adoption model to ensure your CoE service offerings are accessible and consistent across the organization. Create and consolidate key performance indicators to measure the CoEs utility and whether or not the expected value is being translated to tangible results.

    Phase 3 - Operate the CoE

    Operate the CoE to provide service offerings to Agile teams, identify improvements to optimize the function of your Agile teams, and effectively manage and communicate change so that teams can grow within the Agile adoption model and optimize value delivery both within your Agile environment and across functions.

    Phase 3 outline

    Call 1-888-670-8889 or email GuidedImplementations@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Complete these steps on your own, or call us to complete a guided implementation. A guided implementation is a series of 2-3 advisory calls that help you execute each phase of a project. They are included in most advisory memberships.

    Guided Implementation 3: Operate the CoE

    Proposed Time to Completion (in weeks): Variable depending on communication plan

    Step 3.1: Optimize the success of your ACE

    Start with an analyst kick off call:

    • Conduct a baseline assessment of your Agile environment.

    Then complete these activities…

    3.1.1 Use Info-Tech’s ACE Satisfaction Survey to help establish your baseline.

    3.1.2 Use Info-Tech’s CoE Maturity Diagnostic Tool to measure the maturity level of your ACE.

    3.1.3 Prioritize ACE actions by monitoring your metrics.

    Step 3.2: Plan change to enhance your Agile initiatives

    Start with an analyst kick off call:

    • Interface with the ACE with your change management function.

    Then complete these activities…

    3.2.1 Assess the interaction and communication points of your Agile teams.

    3.2.2 Determine the root cause of each metric falling short of expectations.

    3.2.3 Brainstorm solutions to identified issues.

    3.2.4 Review your metrics program.

    3.2.5 Create a communication plan for change.

    Step 3.3: Conduct ongoing retrospectives of your ACE

    Finalize phase deliverable:

    • Build a communications deck for key stakeholders.

    Then complete these activities…

    3.3.1 Use the outputs from your metrics tracking tool to communicate progress.

    3.3.2 Summarize adjustments in areas where the ACE fell short.

    3.3.3 Review the effectiveness of your service offerings.

    3.3.4 Evaluate your ACE Maturity.

    3.3.5 Use Info-Tech’s ACE Communications Deck to deliver your outcomes to the key stakeholders.

    Phase 3 Results & Insights:

    Inject improvements into your Agile environment with operational excellence. Plan changes and communicate them effectively, monitor outcomes on a regular basis, and keep stakeholders in the loop to ensure that their interests are being looked after to ensure long-term viability of the CoE.

    Phase 3, Step 1: Optimize the success of your ACE

    Phase 1

    1.1 Determine the vision of your ACE

    1.2 Define the service offerings of your ACE

    Phase 2

    2.1 Define an adoption plan for your Agile teams

    2.2 Create an ACE engagement plan

    2.3 Define metrics to measure success

    Phase 3

    3.1 Optimize the success of your ACE

    3.2 Plan change to enhance your Agile initiatives

    3.3 Conduct ongoing retrospectives of your ACE

    Tools:

    3.1.1 Use Info-Tech’s ACE Satisfaction Survey to help establish your baseline.

    3.1.2 Use Info-Tech’s CoE Maturity Diagnostic Tool to measure the maturity level of your ACE.

    3.1.3 Prioritize ACE actions by monitoring your metrics.

    Outcomes:

    • Conduct a baseline assessment of your ACE to measure against using a variety of data sources, including interviews, satisfaction surveys, and historical data.
    • Use the Benefits Tracking Tool to start monitoring the outcomes of the ACE and to keep track of trends.

    Ensure the CoE is able to collect the necessary data to measure success

    Establish your collection process to ensure that the CoE has the necessary resources to collect metrics and monitor progress, that there is alignment on what data sources are to be used when collecting data, and that you know which stakeholder is interested in the outcomes of that metric.

    Responsibility

    • Does the CoE have enough manpower to collect the metrics and monitor them?
    • If automated through technology, is it clear who is responsible for its function?

    Source of metric

    • Is the method of data collection standardized so that multiple people could collect the data in the same way?

    Impacted stakeholder

    • Do you know which stakeholder is interested in this metric?
    • How often should the interested stakeholder be informed of progress?

    Intended function

    • What is the expected benefit of increasing this metric?
    • What does the metric intend to communicate to the stakeholder?

    Conduct a baseline assessment of your ACE to measure success

    Establishing the baseline performance of the ACE allows you to have a reasonable understanding of the impact it is having on meeting business objectives. Use user satisfaction surveys, stakeholder interviews, and any current metrics to establish a concept of how you are performing now. Setting new metrics can be a difficult task so it is important to collect as much current data as possible. After the metrics have been established and monitored for a period of time, you can revisit the targets you have set to ensure they are realistic and usable.

    Without a baseline, you cannot effectively:

    • Establish reasonable target metrics that reflect the performance of your Center of Excellence.
    • Identify, diagnose, and resolve any data that deviates from expected outcomes.
    • Measure ongoing business satisfaction given the level of service.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Invest the needed time to baseline your activities. These data points are critical to diagnose successes and failures of the CoE moving forward, and you will need them to be able to refine your service offerings as business conditions or user expectations change. While it may seem like something you can breeze past, the investment is critical.

    Use a variety of sources to get the best picture of your current state; a combination of methods provides the richest insight

    Interviews

    What to do:

    • Conduct interviews (or focus groups) with key influencers and Agile team members.

    Benefits:

    • Data comes from key business decision makers.
    • Identify what is top of mind for your top-level stakeholders.
    • Ask follow-up questions for detail.

    Challenges:

    • This will only provide a very high-level view.
    • Interviewer biases may skew the results.

    Surveys

    What to do:

    • Distribute an Agile-specific stakeholder satisfaction survey. The survey should be specific to identify factors of your current environment.

    Benefits:

    • Every end user/business stakeholder will be able to provide feedback.
    • The survey will be simple to develop and distribute.

    Challenges:

    • Response rates can be low if stakeholders do not understand the value in their opinions.

    Historical Data

    What to do:

    • Collect and analyze existing Agile data such as past retrospectives, Agile team metrics, etc.

    Benefits:

    • Get a full overview of current service offerings, past issues, and current service delivery.
    • Allows you to get an objective view of what is really going on within your Agile teams.

    Challenges:

    • Requires a significant time investment and analytical skills to analyze the data and generate insights on business satisfaction and needs.

    Use Info-Tech’s ACE Satisfaction Survey to help establish your baseline

    3.1.1 Baseline satisfaction survey

    Purpose

    Conduct a user satisfaction survey prior to setting your baseline for your ACE. This will include high-level questions addressing your overall Agile environment and questions addressing teams’ current satisfaction with their processes and technology.

    Steps

    1. Modify the satisfaction survey template to suit your organization and the service offerings you have defined for the Agile Center of Excellence.
    2. Distribute the satisfaction survey to any users who are expected to interface with the ACE.
    3. Document the results and communicate them with the relevant key stakeholders.
    4. Combine these results with historical data points (if available) and stakeholder interviews to get a holistic picture of your current state.

    INFO-TECH DELIVERABLE

    Download the ACE Satisfaction Survey.

    Use Info-Tech’s CoE Maturity Diagnostic Tool to measure the maturity level of your ACE

    3.1.2 CoE maturity assessment

    Purpose

    Assessing your ACEs maturity lets you know where they currently are and what to track to get them to the next step. This will help ensure your ACE is following good practices and has the appropriate mechanisms in place to serve your stakeholders.

    Steps

    1. Download the CoE Maturity Diagnostic Tool to assess the maturity of your ACE.
    2. Complete the assessment tool with all members of your ACE team to determine your maturity score.
    3. Document the results and communicate them with the relevant key stakeholders.
    4. Combine these results with historical data points (if available) and stakeholder interviews to get a holistic picture of your ACE maturity level.

    Document results in the ACE Communications Deck.

    INFO-TECH DELIVERABLE

    Download the CoE Maturity Diagnostic Tool.

    Activity: Prioritize ACE actions by monitoring your metrics

    3.1.3 Variable time commitment

    Input

    • Metrics from ACE Benefits Tracking Tool

    Output

    • Prioritized actions for the ACE

    Materials

    • ACE Benefits Tracking Tool

    Participants

    • ACE team
    1. Review your ACE Benefits Tracking Tool periodically (at the end of sprint cycles, quarterly, etc.) and document metrics that are trending or actively falling short of goals or expectations.
    2. Take the documented list and have the ACE staff consider what actions or decisions can be prioritized to help mend the identified gaps. Look for any trends that could potentially speak to a larger problem or a specific aspect of the ACE or the organizational Agile environment that is not functioning as expected.
    3. Take the opportunity to review metrics that are also tracking above expected value to see if there are any lessons learned that can be extended to other ACE service offerings (e.g. effective engagement or communication strategies) so that the organization can start to learn what is effective and what is not based on their internal struggles and challenges. Spreading successes is just as important as identifying challenges in a CoE model.

    Phase 3, Step 2: Plan change to enhance your Agile initiatives

    Phase 1

    1.1 Determine the vision of your ACE

    1.2 Define the service offerings of your ACE

    Phase 2

    2.1 Define an adoption plan for your Agile teams

    2.2 Create an ACE engagement plan

    2.3 Define metrics to measure success

    Phase 3

    3.1 Optimize the success of your ACE

    3.2 Plan change to enhance your Agile initiatives

    3.3 Conduct ongoing retrospectives of your ACE

    Activities:

    3.2.1 Assess the interaction and communication points of your Agile teams.

    3.2.2 Determine the root cause of each metric falling short of expectations.

    3.2.3 Brainstorm solutions to identified issues

    3.2.4 Review your metrics program.

    3.2.5 Create a communication plan for change.

    Outcomes:

    • Understand how your existing change management process interfaces with the Center of Excellence.
    • Identify issues and ideate solutions to metrics falling short of expectations.
    • Create a communication plan to prepare groups for any necessary change.

    Manage the adaptation of teams as they adopt Agile capabilities

    As Agile spreads, be cognizant of your cultural tolerance to change and its ability to deliver on such change. Change will happen more frequently and continuously, and there may be conceptual (change tolerance) or capability (delivery tolerance) roadblocks along the way that will need to be addressed.

    The Agile adoption model will help to graduate both the tolerance to change and tolerance to deliver over time. As your level of competency to deliver change increases, organizational tolerance to change, especially amongst management, will increase as well. Remember that optimized value delivery comes from this careful balance of aptitude and trust.

    Tolerance to change

    Tolerance to change refers to the conceptual capacity of your people to consume and adopt change. Change tolerance may become a barrier to success because teams might be too engrained with current structures and processes and find any changes too disruptive and uncomfortable.

    Tolerance to deliver

    Tolerance to deliver refers to the capability to deliver on expected change. While teams may be tolerant, they may not have the necessary capacity, skills, or resources to deliver the necessary changes successfully. The ACE can help solve this problem with training and coaching, or possibly by obtaining outside help where necessary.

    Understand how the ACE interfaces with your current change management process

    As the ACE absorbs best practices and identifies areas for improvement, a change management process should be established to address the implementation and sustainability of change without introducing significant disruptions and costs.

    To manage a continuously changing environment, your ACE will need to align and coordinate with organizational change management processes. This process should be capable of evaluating and incorporating multiple change initiatives continuously.

    Desired changes will need to be validated, and localized adaptations will need to be disseminated to the larger organization, and current state policy and procedures will need to be amended as the adoption of Agile spreads and capabilities increase.

    The goal here is to have the ACE governance group identify and interface with parties relevant to successfully implementing any specific change.

    INFO-TECH RELATED RESEARCH:

    Strategy and Leadership: Optimize Change Management

    Optimize your stakeholder management process to identify, prioritize, and effectively manage key stakeholders.

    Where should your Agile change requests come from?

    Changes to the services, structure, or engagement model of your ACE can be triggered from various sources in your organization. You will see that proposed changes may be requested with the best intentions; however, the potential impacts they may have to other areas of the organization can be significant. Consult all sources of ACE change requests to obtain a consensus that your change requests will not deteriorate the ACEs performance and use.

    ACE Governance

    • Sources of ACE Change Requests
      • ACE Policies/Stakeholders
        • Triggers for Change:
          • Changes in business and functional group objectives.
          • Dependencies and legacy policies and procedures.
      • ACE Customers
        • Triggers for Change:
          • Retrospectives and post-mortems.
          • Poor fit of best practices to projects.
      • Metrics
        • Triggers for Change:
          • Performance falling short of expectations.
          • Lack of alignment with changing objectives.
      • Tools and Technologies
        • Triggers for Change:
          • New or enhanced tools and technologies.
          • Changes in development and technology standards.

    Note: Each source of ACE change requests may require a different change management process to evaluate and implement the change.

    Activity: Assess the interaction and communication points of your Agile teams

    3.2.1 1.5 Hours

    Input

    • Understanding of team and organization structure

    Output

    • Current assessment of organizational design

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers
    • Sticky notes

    Participants

    • Development team
    1. Identify everyone who is directly or indirectly involved in projects completed by Agile teams. This can include those that are:
    • Informed of a project’s progress.
    • Expected to interface with the Agile team for solution delivery (e.g. DevOps).
    • Impacted by the success of the delivered solutions.
    • Responsible for the removal of impediments faced by the Agile team.
  • Indicate how each role interacts with the others and how frequently these interactions occur for a typical project. Do this by drawing a diagram on a whiteboard using labelled arrows to indicate types and frequency of interactions.
  • Identify the possible communication, collaboration, and alignment challenges the team will face when working with other groups.
  • Agile Team n
    Group Type of Interaction Potential challenges
    Operations
    • Release management
    • Past challenges transitioning to DevOps.
    • Communication barrier as an impediment.
    PMO
    • Planning
    • Product owner not located with team in organization.
    • PMO still primarily waterfall; need Agile training/coaching

    Activity: Determine the root cause of each metric falling short of expectations

    3.2.2 30 Minutes per metric

    Input

    • Metrics from Benefits Tracking Tool

    Output

    • Root causes to issues

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers

    Participants

    • ACE team
    1. Take each metric from the ACE Benefits Tracking Tool that is lagging behind or has missed expectations and conduct an analysis of why it is performing that way.
    2. Conduct individual webbing sessions to clarify the issues. The goal is to drive out the reasons why these issues are present or why scaling Agile may introduce additional challenges.
    3. Share and discuss these findings with the entire team.

    Example:

    • Lack of best-practice documentation
      • Why?
        • Knowledge siloed within teams
        • No centralized repository for best practices
          • Why?
            • No mechanisms to share between teams
              • Why? Root causes
                • Teams are not sharing localized adaptations
                • CoE is not effectively monitoring team communications
            • Access issues at team level to wiki
              • Why? Root causes
                • Administration issues with best-practice wiki
                • Lack of ACE visibility into wiki access

    Activity: Brainstorm solutions to identified issues

    3.2.3 30 Minutes per metric

    Input

    • Root causes of issues

    Output

    • Fixes and solutions to scaling Agile issues

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers
    • Sticky notes

    Participants

    • Development team
    1. Using the results from your root-cause analysis, brainstorm potential solutions to the identified problems. Frame your brainstorming within the following perspectives: people, process, and technology. Map these solutions using the matrix below.
    2. Synthesize your ideas to create a consolidated list of initiatives.
      1. Highlight the solutions that can address multiple issues.
      2. Collaborate on how solutions can be consolidated into a single initiative.
    3. Write your synthesized solutions on sticky notes.
    SOLUTION CATEGORY
    People Process Technology
    ISSUES Poor face-to-face communication
    Lack of best-practice documentation

    Engage those teams affected by change early to ensure they are prepared

    Strategically managing change is an essential component to ensure that the ACE achieves its desired function. If the change that comes with adopting Agile best practices is going to impact other functions and change their expected workflows, ensure they are well prepared and the benefits for said changes are clearly communicated to them.

    Necessary change may be identified proactively (dependency assessments, system integrity, SME indicates need, etc.) or reactively (through retrospectives, discussions, completing root-cause analyses, etc.), but both types need to be handled the same way – through proper planning and communication with the affected parties.

    Plan any necessary change

    Understand the points where other groups will be affected by the adoption of Agile practices and recognize the potential challenges they may face. Plan changes to accommodate interactions between these groups without roadblocks or impediments.

    Communicate the change

    Structure a communication plan based on your identified challenges and proposed changes so that groups are well prepared to make the necessary adjustments to accommodate Agile workflows.

    Review and modify your metrics and baselines to ensure they are achievable in changing environments

    Consider the possible limitations that will exist from environmental complexities when measuring your Agile teams. Dependencies and legacy policies and procedures that pose a bottleneck to desired outcomes will need to be changed before teams can be measured justifiably. Take the time to ensure the metrics you crafted earlier are plausible in your current environment and there is not a need for transitional metrics.

    Are your metrics achievable?

    Specific

    Measureable

    Achievable

    • Adopting Agile is a journey, not just a destination. Ensure that the metrics a team is measured against reflect expectations for the team’s current level of Agile adoption and consider external dependencies that may limit their ability to achieve intended results.

    Realistic

    Time-bound

    Info-Tech Insight

    Use metrics as diagnostics, not as motivation. Teams will find ways to meet metrics they are measured by making sacrifices and taking unneeded risk to do so. To avoid dysfunction in your monitoring, use metrics as analytical tools to inform decision making, not as a yardstick for judgement.

    Activity: Review your metrics program

    3.2.4 Variable time commitment

    Input

    • Identified gaps
    • Agile team interaction points

    Output

    • ACE baselines
    • Past measurements

    Materials

    • ACE Benefits Tracking Tool

    Participants

    • ACE
    1. Now that you have identified gaps in your current state, see if those will have any impact on the achievability of your current metrics program.
    2. Review your root-cause analyses and brainstormed solutions, and hypothesize whether or not they will have any downstream impact to goal attainment. It is possible that there is no impact, but as cross-functional collaboration increases, the likelihood that groups will act as bottlenecks or impediments to expected performance will increase.
    3. Consider how any changes will impact the interaction points between teams based on the results from activity 3.2.1: Assess the interaction and communication points of your Agile teams. If there are too many negative impacts it may be a sign to re-consider the hypothesized solution to the problem and consider alternatives.
    4. In any cases where a metric has been altered, adjust its goal measurement to reflect its changes in the ACE Benefits Tracking Tool.

    Case study: Agile change at the GSA

    CASE STUDY

    Industry Government

    Source Navin Vembar, Agile Government Leadership

    Challenge

    The GSA is tasked with completed management of the Integrated Award Environment (IAE).

    • The IAE manages ten federal information technology systems that enable registering, searching, and applying for federal awards, as well as tracking them.
    • The IAE also manages the Federal Service Desk.

    The IAE staff had to find a way to break down the problem of modernization into manageable chunks that would demonstrate progress, but also had to be sure to capture a wide variety of user needs with the ability to respond to those needs throughout development.

    Had to work out the logistics of executing Agile change within the GSA, an agency that relies heavily on telework. In the case of modernization, they had a product owner in Florida while the development team was spread across the metro Washington, DC area.

    Solution

    Agile provided the ability to build incremental successes that allowed teams successful releases and built enthusiasm around the potential of adopting Agile practices offered.

    • GSA put in place an organization framework that allowed for planning of change at the portfolio level to enable the change necessary to allow for teams to execute tasks at the project level.
    • A four-year plan with incremental integration points allowed for larger changes on a quarterly basis while maintaining a bi-weekly sprint cycle.
    • They adopted IBM’s RTC tool for a Scrum board and on Adobe Connect for daily Scrum sessions to ensure transparency and effectiveness of outcomes across their collocated teams.

    Create a clear, concise communication plan

    Communication is key to avoid surprises and lost productivity created by the implementation of changes.

    User groups and the business need to be given sufficient notice of an impending change. Be concise, be comprehensive, and ensure that the message is reaching the right audience so that no one is blindsided and unable to deliver what is needed. This will allow them to make appropriate plans to accept the change, minimizing the impact of the change on productivity.

    Key Aspects of a Communication Plan

    • The method of communication (email, meetings, workshops, etc.).
    • The delivery strategy (who will deliver the message?).
    • The communication responsibility structure.
    • The communication frequency.
    • A feedback mechanism that allows you to review the effectiveness of your plan.
    • The message that you need to present.

    Communicating change

    • What is the change?
    • Why are we doing it?
    • How are we going to go about it?
    • What are we trying to achieve?
    • How often will we be updated?

    (Cornelius & Associates, The Qualities of Leadership: Leading Change)

    Apply the following principles to enhance the clarity of your message

    1. Be Consistent
    • "This is important because..."
      • The core message must be consistent regardless of audience, channel, or medium.
      • Test your communication and obtain feedback before delivering your message.
      • A lack of consistency can be perceived as deception.
  • Be Clear
    • "This means..."
      • Say what you mean and mean what you say.
      • Choice of language is important.
      • Don’t use jargon.
  • Be Relevant
    • "This affects you because..."
      • Talk about what matters to the audience.
      • Talk about what matters to the change initiative.
      • Tailor the details of the message to each audience’s specific concerns.
      • Communicate truthfully; do not make false promises or hide bad news.
  • Be Concise
    • "In summary..."
      • Keep communication short and to the point so key messages are not lost in the noise.
  • Activity: Create a communication plan for change

    3.2.5 1.5 Hours

    Input

    • Desired messages
    • Stakeholder list

    Output

    • Communication plan

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers

    Participants

    • CoE
    1. Define the audience(s) for your communications. Consider who needs to be the audience of your different communication events and how it will impact them.
    2. Identify who the messenger will be to deliver the message.
    3. Identify your communication methods. Decide on the methods you will use to deliver each communication event. Your delivery method may vary depending on the audience it is targeting.
    4. Establish a timeline for communication releases. Set dates for your communication events. This can be recurring (weekly, monthly, etc.) or one-time events.
    5. Determine what the content of the message must include. Use the guidelines on the following slide to ensure the message is concise and impactful.

    Note: It is important to establish a feedback mechanism to ensure that the communication has been effective in communicating the change to the intended audiences. This can be incorporated into your ACE satisfaction surveys.

    Audience Messenger Format Timing Message
    Operations Development team Email
    • Monthly (major release)
    • Ad hoc (minor release and fixes)
    Build ready for release
    Key stakeholders CIO Meeting
    • Monthly unless dictated otherwise
    Updates on outcomes from past two sprint cycles

    Phase 3, Step 3: Conduct ongoing retrospectives of your ACE

    Phase 1

    1.1 Determine the vision of your ACE

    1.2 Define the service offerings of your ACE

    Phase 2

    2.1 Define an adoption plan for your Agile teams

    2.2 Create an ACE engagement plan

    2.3 Define metrics to measure success

    Phase 3

    3.1 Optimize the success of your ACE

    3.2 Plan change to enhance your Agile initiatives

    3.3 Conduct ongoing retrospectives of your ACE

    Activities/Tools:

    3.3.1 Use the outputs from your metrics tracking tool to communicate progress.

    3.3.2 Summarize adjustments in areas where the ACE fell short.

    3.3.3 Re-conduct satisfaction surveys and compare against your baseline.

    3.3.4 Use Info-Tech’s CoE Maturity Diagnostic Tool to baseline current practices

    3.3.5 Use Info-Tech’s ACE Communications Deck to deliver your outcomes to the key stakeholders.

    Outcomes:

    • Conduct a retrospective of your ACE to enable the continuous improvement of your Agile program.
    • Structure a communications deck to communicate with stakeholders the outcomes from introducing the ACE to the organization.

    Reflect on your ACEs performance to lead the way to enterprise agility

    After functioning for a period of time, it is imperative to review the function of your ACE to ensure its continual alignment and see in what ways it can improve.

    At the end of the year, take the time to deliberately review and discuss:

    1. The effectiveness and use of your ACEs service offerings.
    2. What went well or wrong during the ACEs operation.
    3. What can be done differently to improve reach, usability, and effectiveness.
    4. Bring together Agile teams and discuss the processes they follow and inquire about suggestions for improvement.

    What is involved?

    • Use your metrics program to diagnose areas of issue and success. The diagnostic value of your metrics can help lead conversations with your Agile teams when attempting to inquire about suggestions for improvement.
    • Leverage your satisfaction surveys from the creation of your ACE and compare them against satisfaction surveys run after a year of operation. What are the lessons learned between then and now?
    • While it is primarily conducted by the ACE team, keep in mind it is a collaborative function and should involve all members, including Agile teams, product owners, Scrum masters, etc.

    Communicating with your key influencers is vital to ensure long-term operation of the ACE

    To ensure the long-term viability of your ACE and that your key influencers will continue funding, you need to demonstrate the ROI the Center of Excellence has provided.

    The overlying purpose of your ACE is to effectively align your Agile teams with corporate objectives. This means that there have to be communicable benefits that point to the effort and resources invested being valuable to the organization. Re-visit your prioritized stakeholder list and get ready to show them the impact the ACE has had on business outcomes.

    Communication with stakeholders is the primary method of building and developing a lasting relationship. Correct messaging can build bridges and tear down barriers, as well as soften opposition and bolster support.

    This section will help you to prepare an effective communication piece that summarizes the metrics stakeholders are interested in, as well as some success stories or benefits that are not communicable through metrics to provide extra context to ongoing successes of the ACE.

    INFO-TECH RELATED RESEARCH:

    Strategy and Leadership: Manage Stakeholder Relations

    Optimize your stakeholder management process to identify, prioritize, and effectively manage key stakeholders.

    Involve key stakeholders in your retrospectives to justify the funding for your ACE

    Those who fund the ACE have a large influence on the long-term success of your ACE. If you have not yet involved your stakeholders, you need to re-visit your organizational funding model for the ACE and ensure that your key stakeholders include the key decision makers for your funding. While they may have varying levels of interest and desires for granularity of data reporting, they need to at least be informed on a high level and kept as champions of the ACE so that there are no roadblocks to the long-term viability of this program.

    Keep this in mind as the ACE begins to demonstrate success, as it is not uncommon to have additional members added to your funding model as your service scales, especially in the chargeback models.

    As new key influencers are included, the ACEs governing group must ensure that collective interests may align and that more priorities don’t lead to derailment.

    The image shows a matrix. The matrix is labelled with Involvement at the bottom, and Power on the left side, and has the upper left quadrant labelled Keep Satisfied, the upper right quadrant labelled Key players, the lower right quadrant labelled Keep informed, and the lower left quadrant labelled Minimal effort. In the matric, there are several roles shown, with roles such as CFO, Apps Director, Funding Group, and CIO highlighted in the Key players section.

    Use the outputs from your metrics tracking tool to communicate progress

    3.3.1 1 Hour

    Use the ACE Benefits Tracking Tool to track the progress of your Agile environment to monitor whether or not the ACE is having a positive impact on the business’ ability to meet its objectives. The outputs will allow you to communicate incremental benefits that have been realized and point towards positive trends that will ensure the long-term buy-in of your key influencers.

    For communication purposes, use this tool to:

    • Re-visit who the impacted or interested stakeholders are so you can tailor your communications to be as impactful as possible for each key influencer of the ACE.

    The image shows a screen capture of the Agile CoE Metrics Tracking sheet.

    • Collate the benefits of the current projects undertaken by the Center of Excellence to give an overall recap of the ACEs impact.

    The image is a screen capture of the Summary Report sheet.

    Communicate where the ACE fell short

    Part of communicating the effectiveness of your ACE is to demonstrate that it is able to remedy projects and processes when they fall short of expectations and brainstorm solutions that effectively address these challenges. Take the opportunity to summarize where results were not as expected, and the ways in which the ACE used its influence or services to drive a positive outcome from a problem diagnosis. Stakeholders do not want a sugar-coated story – they want to see tangible results based on real scenarios.

    Summarizing failures will demonstrate to key influencers that:

    • You are not cherry-picking positive metrics to report and that the ACE faced challenges that it was able to overcome to drive positive business outcomes.
    • You are being transparent with the successes and challenges faced by the ACE, fostering increased trust within your stakeholders regarding the capabilities of Agile.
    • Resolution mechanisms are working as intended, successfully building failure tolerance and trust in change management policies and procedures.

    Activity: Summarize adjustments in areas where the ACE fell short

    3.3.2 15 Minutes per metric

    Input

    • Diagnosed problems from tracking tool
    • Root-cause analyses

    Output

    • Summary of change management successes

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers

    Participants

    • ACE
    1. Create a list of items from the ACE Benefits Tracking Tool that fell short of expectations or set goals.
    2. For each point, create a brief synopsis of the root-cause analysis completed and summarize the brainstormed solution and its success in remedying the issue. If this process is not complete, create a to-date summary of any progress.
    3. Choose two to three pointed success stories from this list that will communicate broad success to your set of stakeholders.
    Name of metric that fell short
    Baseline measurement 65% of users satisfied with ACE services.
    Goal measurement 80% of users satisfied with ACE services.
    Actual measurement 70% of users satisfied with ACE services.
    Results of root-cause analysis Onboarding was not extensive enough; teams were unaware of some of the services offered, rendering them unsatisfied.
    Proposed solution Revamp onboarding process to include capability map of service offered.
    Summary of success TBD

    Re-conduct surveys with the ACE Satisfaction Survey to review the effectiveness of your service offerings

    3.3.3 Re-conduct satisfaction surveys and compare against your baseline

    Purpose

    This satisfaction survey will give you a template to follow to monitor the effectiveness of your ACEs defined service offerings. The goal is to understand what worked, and what did not, so you can add, retract, or modify service offerings where necessary.

    Steps

    1. Re-use the satisfaction survey to measure the effectiveness of the service offerings. Add questions regarding specific service offerings where necessary.
    2. Cross-analyze your satisfaction survey with metrics tied to your service offerings to help understand the root cause of the issues.
    3. Use the root-cause analysis exercises from step 3.2 to find the root causes of issues.
    4. Create a set of recommendations to add, amend, or improve any existing service offerings.

    INFO-TECH DELIVERABLE

    Download the ACE Satisfaction Survey.

    Use Info-Tech’s CoE Maturity Diagnostic Tool to baseline current practices

    3.3.4 ACE Maturity Assessment

    Purpose

    Assess your ACEs maturity by using Info-Tech’s CoE Maturity Diagnostic Tool. Assessing your ACEs maturity lets you know where you currently are, and where to look for improvements. Note that your optimal Maturity Level will depend on organizational specifics (e.g. a small organization with a handful of Agile Teams can be less mature than a large organization with hundreds of Agile Teams).

    Steps

    1. Download the CoE Maturity Diagnostic Tool to assess the maturity of your ACE.
    2. Complete the assessment tool with all members of your ACE team to determine your current Maturity score.
    3. Document the results in the ACE Communications Deck.

    Document results in the ACE Communications Deck.

    INFO-TECH DELIVERABLE

    Download the CoE Maturity Diagnostic Tool.

    Use Info-Tech’s ACE Communications Deck to deliver your outcomes to the key stakeholders

    3.3.5 Structure communications to each of your key stakeholders

    Purpose

    The ACE Communications Deck will give you a template to follow to effectively communicate with your stakeholders and ensure the long-term viability of your Agile Center of Excellence. Fill in the slides as instructed and provide each stakeholder with a targeted view of the successes of the ACE.

    Steps

    1. Determine who your target audience is for the Communications Deck – you may desire to create one for each of your key stakeholders as they may have different sets of interests.
    2. Fill out the ACE Communications Deck with the suggested inputs from the exercises you have completed during this research set.
    3. Review communications with members of the ACE to ensure that there are no communicable benefits that have been missed or omitted in the deck.

    INFO-TECH DELIVERABLE

    Download the ACE Communications Deck.

    Summary of accomplishment

    Knowledge Gained

    • An understanding of social capital as the key driver for organizational Agile success, and how it optimizes the value delivery of your Agile teams.
    • Importance of flexible governance to balance the benefits of localized adaptation and centralized control.
    • Alignment of service offerings with both business objectives and functional expectations as critical to ensuring long-term engagement with service offerings.

    Processes Optimized

    • Knowledge management and transfer of Agile best practices to new or existing Agile teams.
    • Optimization of service offerings for Agile teams based on organizational culture and objectives.
    • Change request optimization via interfacing ACE functions with existing change management processes.
    • Communication planning to ensure transparency during cross-functional collaboration.

    Deliverables Completed

    • A set of service offerings offered by the Center of Excellence that are aligned with the business, Agile teams, and related stakeholders.
    • Engagement plans for Agile team members based on a standardized adoption model to access the ACEs service offerings.
    • A suite of Agile metrics to measure effectiveness of Agile teams, the ACE itself, and its ability to deliver positive outcomes.
    • A communications plan to help create cross-functional transparency over pending changes as Agile spreads.
    • A communications deck to communicate Agile goals, actions, and outcomes to key stakeholders to ensure long-term viability of the CoE.

    Research contributors and experts

    Paul Blaney, Technology Delivery Executive, Thought Leader and passionate Agile Advocate

    Paul has been an Agile practitioner since the manifesto emerged some 20 years ago, applying and refining his views through real life experience at several organizations from startups to large enterprises. He has recently completed the successful build out of the inaugural Agile Delivery Centre of Excellence at TD bank in Toronto.

    John Munro, President Scrum Masters Inc.

    John Munro is the President of Scrum Masters Inc., a software optimization professional services firm using Agile, Scrum, and Lean to help North American firms “up skill” their software delivery people and processes. Scrum Masters’ unique, highly collaborative “Master Mind” consulting model leverages Agile/Lean experts on a biweekly basis to solve clients’ technical and process challenges.

    Doug Birgfeld, Senior Partner Agile Wave

    Doug has been a leader in building great teams, Agile project management, and business process innovation for over 20 years. As Senior Partner and Chief Evangelist at Agile Wave, his mission is to educate and to learn from all those who care about effective government delivery, nationally.

    Related Info-Tech research

    Implement Agile Practices That Work

    Agile is a cultural shift. Don't just do Agile, be Agile.

    Enable Organization-Wide Collaboration by Scaling Agile

    Execute a disciplined approach to rolling out Agile methods in the organization.

    Improve Application Development Throughput

    Drive down your delivery time by eliminating development inefficiencies and bottlenecks while maintaining high quality.

    Implement DevOps Practices That Work

    Accelerate software deployment through Dev and Ops collaboration.

    Related Info-Tech research (continued)

    Maximize the Benefits from Enterprise Applications with a Center of Excellence

    Optimize your organization’s enterprise application capabilities with a refined and scalable methodology.

    Drive Efficiency and Agility with a Fit-for-Purpose Quality Management Program

    Be proactive; it costs exponentially more to fix a problem the longer it goes unnoticed.

    Optimize the Change Management Process

    Right-size your change management process.

    Improve Requirements Gathering

    Back to basics: great products are built on great requirements.

    Bibliography

    Ambler, Scott. “Agile Requirements Change Management.” Agile Modeling. Scott Amber + Associates, 2014. Web. 12 Apr. 2016.

    Ambler, Scott. “Center of Excellence (CoEs).” Disciplined Agile 2.0: A Process Decision Framework for Enterprise I.T. Scott Amber + Associates. Web. 01 Apr. 2016.

    Ambler, Scott. “Transforming From Traditional to Disciplined Agile Delivery.” Case Study: Disciplined Agile Delivery Adoption. Scott Amber + Associates, 2013. Web.

    Beers, Rick. “IT – Business Alignment Why We Stumble and the Path Forward.” Oracle Corporation, July 2013. Web.

    Cornelius & Associates. “The Qualities of Leadership: Leading Change.” Cornelius & Associates, n.d. Web.

    Craig, William et al. “Generalized Criteria and Evaluation Method for Center of Excellence: A Preliminary Report.” Carnegie Mellon University Research Showcase @ CMU – Software Engineering Institute. Dec. 2009. Web. 20 Apr. 2016.

    Forsgren, Dr. Nicole et al (2019), Accelerate: State of DevOps 2019, Google, https://services.google.com/fh/files/misc/state-of-devops-2019.pdf

    Gerardi, Bart (2017), Agile Centers of Excellence, PMI Projectmanagement.com, https://www.projectmanagement.com/articles/405819/Agile-Centers-of-Excellence

    Gerardi, Bart (2017), Champions of Agile Adoption, PMI Projectmanagement.com, https://www.projectmanagement.com/articles/418151/Champions-of-Agile-Adoption

    Gerardi, Bart (2017), The Roles of an Agile COE, PMI Projectmanagement.com, https://www.projectmanagement.com/articles/413346/The-Roles-of-an-Agile-COE

    Hohl, P. et al. “Back to the future: origins and directions of the ‘Agile Manifesto’ – views of the originators.” Journal of Software Engineering Research and Development, vol. 6, no. 15, 2018. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40411-0...

    Kaltenecker, Sigi and Hundermark, Peter. “What Are Self-Organising Teams?” InfoQ. 18 July 2014. Web. 14 Apr. 2016.

    Kniberg, Henrik and Anderson Ivarsson. “Scaling Agile @ Spotify with Tribes, Squads, Chapters & Guilds.” Oct. 2012. Web. 30 Apr. 2016.

    Kumar, Alok et al. “Enterprise Agile Adoption: Challenges and Considerations.” Scrum Alliance. 30 Oct. 2014. Web. 30 May 2016.

    Levison, Mark. “Questioning Servant Leadership.” InfoQ, 4 Sept. 2008. Web. https://www.infoq.com/news/2008/09/servant_leadership/

    Linders, Ben. “Don't Copy the Spotify Model.” InfoQ.com. 6 Oct. 2016.

    Loxton, Matthew (June 1, 2011), CoP vs CoE – What’s the difference, and Why Should You Care?, Wordpress.com

    McDowell, Robert, and Bill Simon. In Search of Business Value: Ensuring a Return on Your Technology Investment. SelectBooks, 2010

    Novak, Cathy. “Case Study: Agile Government and the State of Maine.” Agile Government Leadership, n.d. Web.

    Pal, Nirmal and Daniel Pantaleo. “Services are the Language and Building Blocks of an Agile Enterprise.” The Agile Enterprise: Reinventing your Organization for Success in an On-Demand World. 6 Dec. 2015. Springer Science & Business Media.

    Rigby, Darrell K. et al (2018), Agile at Scale, Harvard Business Review, https://hbr.org/2018/05/agile-at-scale

    Scaledagileframework.com, Create a Lean-Agile Center of Excellence, Scaled Agile, Inc, https://www.scaledagileframework.com/lace/

    Shepley, Joe. “8 reasons COEs fail (Part 2).” Agile Ramblings, 22 Feb. 2010. https://joeshepley.com/2010/02/22/8-reasons-coes-fail-part-2/

    Stafford, Jan. “How upper management misconceptions foster Agile failures.” TechTarget. Web. 07 Mar. 2016.

    Taulli, Tom (2020), RPA Center Of Excellence (CoE): What You Need To Know For Success, Forbes.com, https://www.forbes.com/sites/tomtaulli/2020/01/25/rpa-center-of-excellence-coe-what-you-need-to-know-for-success/#24364620287a

    Telang, Mukta. “The CMMI Agile Adoption Model.” ScrumAlliance. 29 May 2015. Web. 15 Apr. 2016.

    VersionOne. “13th Annual State of Agile Report.” VersionOne. 2019. Web.

    Vembar, Navin. “Case Study: Agile Government and the General Services Administration (Integrated Award Environment).” Agile Government Leadership, n.d. Web.

    Wenger, E., R. A. McDermott, et al. (2002), Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge, Harvard Business Press.

    Wenger, E., White, N., Smith, J.D. Digital Habitats; Stewarding Technology for Communities. Cpsquare (2009).

    Tymans Group Consulting

    IT resilience, carefree entrepreneurship.

    Discover and implement all the ingredients that make your IT perform fast and rock solid.

    Yes, I want stable and performant IT Operations

    We are multidisciplinary infrastructure and IT Operations experts.
    We bring passion, focus, and results to our work and your company.

    TY innovates resilience embedding in your organization

    Let's have a chat

    • TY as your advisor

      This gives you our expertise on tap. Do you have an issue? Call us. You want to have a sparring partner to solve a problem? Call us. Do you need a sounding board? Call us.

      TY provides advisory services as well as traditional consulting. We also execute study and revision services for your policies, standards, procedures, and guidelines to ensure compliance with DORA, NIS2 and corporate requirements of both your own company and that of your clients. And we also check against our internal best ways of working.

      Book a conversation

    • Focused Consulting and Implementing

      This is where you have our undivided attention, and we work with you one on one until resolution. Note that there is a waiting period for this service at this time.

      If you are interested, please first book a call so that we can determine if we are a good fit together.

      Book a conversation

    What our relations tell us

    • Citigroup Manager

      As a technical consultant, Gert is an All-Star performer...  He has got many wins under his belt... His willingness to work hard, knowledge of regional systems (especially Tokyo) and Microsoft Office is well respected within the Group 

    • Sandra

      Tx for all the efforts done! Great Job! And good luck for the ones amongst you that still need to work tomorrow Grtz Sandra VB
    • Patrick A.

      Hi Gert, I'm busy documenting .... Thanks for your real friendly and careful, yet effective support :-) Patrick A.
    • Lucie VH

      During my vacation, Gert took over the management of a number of ongoing problems. Even before I actually left for my trip, he took action and proposed a number of improvements. Gert coordinated between the different stakeholders and PTA's and resolved a number of acute issues. And he did this in a very pleasant, yet effective way.
    • Dawn

      No worries. It only freaked me out for a few minutes, then I saw that the system had blocked them from doing any real damage. Thanks for the cleanup and extra measures, though! As always, you rock!
    • After a successful DRP

      Thanks for all the efforts done ans special Tx Gert for Coordinating this again!
    • A CIO

      Yet again Gert, Thanks for handling this in such a top way!
    • A Sales Manager

      Awesome Gert, I will let the team know we can close this issue!
    • Investment bank manager

      Flexibility, Adaptability, problem Solving are Gert's strong points, Exceptionally beneficial in "crisis." I can attest that Gert will always see a problem through. if he needs to hand it off, it will aways have good handoff notes. His business knowledge is good and will part of the next project.

    • Wall Street Performance Review

      As with the classes for SFC, Gert organised formal classes for all of the Research IT teams.... I would class this job as well done, given everything that was going on with Rsearch IT. 

    • Stuart B on Gert Taeymans

      Excellent technical resource. Quick help on issues and provide explanations to regional teams. Often covers for us in the evenings or when things get particularly busy.

    • Asia support to roll out global system

      Gert time in Japan was a great success. He really helped the IT group through a really difficult tume during the roll out of {the global research publishing system} and had to cover all the bases that had not been properly coverd by the previous person in Japan. Gert's visit also coincided with Stuart's joining into the Asia IT Research group. Gert was very flexible  in the hours that he worked and the lenght of time he was out in Tokyo (in the end more than 4 weeks.)

      The feedback from both the users and the IT group was VERY positive on Gertt's contribution. He was more than capabable to put across technical points to the IT team, in their language.

    • IT Director

      Gert is a knowledgeable individual who takes on additional responsibility... rapidly addressng end-user issues and developing custom solutions when needed.

    Benefits of working with Tymans Group

    • We focus on actual deliverables

      TY delivers on the IT resilience what and how. Get actionable IT, management, governance, and productivity research, insights, blueprints with templates, easy-to-use tools, and clear instructions to help you execute effectively and become IT resilient.

    • Get insights from top IT professionals

      Our TY network base constantly informs us about our IT resilience research and validates it through client experiences. TY adds to that by applying this research to real-world situations in Belgium, the Netherlands, Germany, Europe and the US.

    • Data-driven insights

      It is tempting to use your gut instinct. Don't. Everything TY does, is data-driven. From our research to our interactions with you, we use an analytical approach to help you move forward with your key IT resilience projects.

    Frequently asked questions

    • How does Tymans Group IT Operations advisory work?

      TY believes strongly in leveraging technology and personal delivery. That is why TY uses one on one calling sessions using Teams and Zoom. When needed I do on site delivery.

      Every advisory option has a set number of interactive contact points in addition to email and chat options. Every contact request is answered by me personally. 

      Through the use of technology, I ensure that instead of you having to drive to your coach, the coach “comes” to you!

    • What are Tymans Group advisory service timings?

      TY is available on European time from 09:00 until 17:00 and US EST 09:00-17:00 (depending on already booked appointments). 

    • How much to Tymans Group programs cost?

      While this is a difficult question to answer, let's give it a shot.

      Ideally I work value-based. But this is more for well-defined projects where the ROI is quantifiable rather than qualifiable.

      Often advisory services are a discovery and we obtain results together. You may even only need an experienced sounding board. This type of pricing starts from €4,500.

    • Does Tymans Group have a "pick your brain" option?

      By popular demand, yes, I added this. It is not the cheapest way to use me, but it may be the most effective for you.

    • How are Tymans Group advisory services delivered?

      TY believes strongly in leveraging technology and personal delivery. That is why TY uses one on one calling sessions using Teams and Zoom. When needed I do on site delivery.

      This way I ensure that instead of you having to drive to your coach, the coach “comes” to you!

      You are allowed to record the sessions and use them internally in your organization, including as part of your internal training. You are not allowed to resell these without a resale agreement.

    • Tymans Group is delivered online via calls? Isn't on-site better?

      Interestingly, in the majority of advisory services the answer is no.

      Purely on-site automatically limits the time we can spend together. Thus, typically, the interactions are of a shorter duration. Even when this is done over a longer timeframe, like 5 to 10 days, this is really too short for effective advising, coaching and mentoring. 

      We stay away from accelerated programs, where I can send a lot of information, and most of it will not stick.

      Terry Sejnowski  a neuroscientist, actually states that cramming does not help you remember. It gets you, maybe, through the next exam, but the information is not retained. The way to integrate and remember information is to spread out the study and repeat. This is called the spacing effect.

      This is why I employ the online delivery method. When you record our sessions, you can come back and again repeat it, note down your questions and fire them off to me. I respond and you go back into the talk. Then you apply, possibly fail, and come back again until it succeeds, and then you make it your own.

      That is why time-pressured, on-site delivery does not work. Our method makes you effective because you internalized the material and feedback. This can then be rounded-off by on-site finalization.

      10-15 years ago, this was not possible, as the web-based tools were simply not fast enough. Today, unless you are taking classes like carpentry or other topics that require on-site delivery, online delivery is the way to go.

    • Can I pay by wire transfer?

      We actually prefer wire transfer. It cuts down on the financial fees and it is the norm in the European Union. Our US customer can also use this feature and pay into our US bank.

    • Where is Tymans Group located?

      Tymans Group has two locations:

      In Europe, Belgium and in Greenville, DE, United States, 

      The HQ is in Belgium.

    • Does this work for less than 25 employees?

      Resilience is not size-dependent. That said, if you are supplying critical services to financial services firms, you may not have a choice. In that case, be prepared to up your game. Call TY in this case. We can help you fulfill third-party requirements, such as the DORA regulation.

      In other cases, if you plan to grow your company beyond 25 employees, then yes. Start with the basics, though. Make sure you have a good understanding of your current challenges. Schedule a chat with me to determine the right baseline.

      If you are just starting out and want to ensure that your company's processes are correct right out of the gate, it's better to give me a call. We can start you off in the right direction without spending too much.

      Our guides are only available to existing advisory clients. Let's chat informally if we are a fit for you.

    • I'm a small business owner, can I do all this by myself?

      Our guides are only available to existing advisory clients.

      But also see the above question about company size and target clients. If you have fewer than 25 employees and you are not supplying critical services to financial institutions, then maybe some of our guides are not for you. We can still help you organize your resilience, but it may be more cost-effective to use only our TY Advisory services.

      Once you grow beyond 25 employees, you will benefit from our processes. Just implement what you need. How do you know what you require? You probably already have an inkling of what is lacking in your organization. If you are unsure, please get in touch with us.

      In short, the answer is yes, and TY can help you. Once you know what you are looking for, that guide allows you to handle it yourself. If you require help selecting the right guide, please get in touch with us.

    • Do you provide refunds?

      Before buying the DIY guides, available only to existing advisory clients,, please refer to the free Executive Summary when available. If there is no Executive summary available, please contact me with any questions you have. 

      As these are downloadable products, I cannot provide any refunds, but I will help you with any exchange where you have a good reason. 

    • I bought the wrong item

      If you bought the wrong item, please contact me and we'll be happy to provide an alternative item.

    • I want more assistance

      Yes, more assistance is available.  Tymans Group can provide you with any assistance you require within the parameters of your contract.

      Per-guide assistance ranges from a single phone or video consultation to guided implementation or a workshop. Alternatively we can go to do-it-for-you implementation or even full-time consulting.

      Note that our guides are only available to existing advisory clients.

      Please contact me for a talk.

    I want more information to become more resilient.

    Continue reading

    Develop an Availability and Capacity Management Plan

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}500|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 8.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $2,840 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 10 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Availability & Capacity Management
    • Parent Category Link: /availability-and-capacity-management
    • It is crucial for capacity managers to provide capacity in advance of need to maximize availability.
    • In an effort to ensure maximum uptime, organizations are overprovisioning (an average of 59% for compute, and 48% for storage). With budget pressure mounting (especially on the capital side), the cost of this approach can’t be ignored.
    • Half of organizations have experienced capacity-related downtime, and almost 60% wait more than three months for additional capacity.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • All too often capacity management is left as an afterthought. The best capacity managers bake capacity management into their organization’s business processes, becoming drivers of value.
    • Communication is key. Build bridges between your organization’s silos, and involve business stakeholders in a dialog about capacity requirements.

    Impact and Result

    • Map business metrics to infrastructure component usage, and use your organization’s own data to forecast demand.
    • Project future needs in line with your hardware lifecycle. Never suffer availability issues as a result of a lack of capacity again.
    • Establish infrastructure as a driver of business value, not a “black hole” cost center.

    Develop an Availability and Capacity Management Plan Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should build a capacity management plan, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    • Develop an Availability and Capacity Management Plan – Phases 1-4

    1. Conduct a business impact analysis

    Determine the most critical business services to ensure availability.

    • Develop an Availability and Capacity Management Plan – Phase 1: Conduct a Business Impact Analysis
    • Business Impact Analysis Tool

    2. Establish visibility into core systems

    Craft a monitoring strategy to gather usage data.

    • Develop an Availability and Capacity Management Plan – Phase 2: Establish Visibility into Core Systems
    • Capacity Snapshot Tool

    3. Solicit and incorporate business needs

    Integrate business stakeholders into the capacity management process.

    • Develop an Availability and Capacity Management Plan – Phase 3: Solicit and Incorporate Business Needs
    • Capacity Plan Template

    4. Identify and mitigate risks

    Identify and mitigate risks to your capacity and availability.

    • Develop an Availability and Capacity Management Plan – Phase 4: Identify and Mitigate Risks

    [infographic]

    Workshop: Develop an Availability and Capacity Management Plan

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Conduct a Business Impact Analysis

    The Purpose

    Determine the most important IT services for the business.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Understand which services to prioritize for ensuring availability.

    Activities

    1.1 Create a scale to measure different levels of impact.

    1.2 Evaluate each service by its potential impact.

    1.3 Assign a criticality rating based on the costs of downtime.

    Outputs

    RTOs/RPOs

    List of gold systems

    Criticality matrix

    2 Establish Visibility Into Core Systems

    The Purpose

    Monitor and measure usage metrics of key systems.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Capture and correlate data on business activity with infrastructure capacity usage.

    Activities

    2.1 Define your monitoring strategy.

    2.2 Implement your monitoring tool/aggregator.

    Outputs

    RACI chart

    Capacity/availability monitoring strategy

    3 Develop a Plan to Project Future Needs

    The Purpose

    Determine how to project future capacity usage needs for your organization.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Data-based, systematic projection of future capacity usage needs.

    Activities

    3.1 Analyze historical usage trends.

    3.2 Interface with the business to determine needs.

    3.3 Develop a plan to combine these two sources of truth.

    Outputs

    Plan for soliciting future needs

    Future needs

    4 Identify and Mitigate Risks

    The Purpose

    Identify potential risks to capacity and availability.

    Develop strategies to ameliorate potential risks.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Proactive approach to capacity that addresses potential risks before they impact availability.

    Activities

    4.1 Identify capacity and availability risks.

    4.2 Determine strategies to address risks.

    4.3 Populate and review completed capacity plan.

    Outputs

    List of risks

    List of strategies to address risks

    Completed capacity plan

    Further reading

    Develop an Availability and Capacity Management Plan

    Manage capacity to increase uptime and reduce costs.

    ANALYST PERSPECTIVE

    The cloud changes the capacity manager’s job, but it doesn’t eliminate it.

    "Nobody doubts the cloud’s transformative power. But will its ascent render “capacity manager” an archaic term to be carved into the walls of datacenters everywhere for future archaeologists to puzzle over? No. While it is true that the cloud has fundamentally changed how capacity managers do their jobs , the process is more important than ever. Managing capacity – and, by extent, availability – means minimizing costs while maximizing uptime. The cloud era is the era of unlimited capacity – and of infinite potential costs. If you put the infinity symbol on a purchase order… well, it’s probably not a good idea. Manage demand. Manage your capacity. Manage your availability. And, most importantly, keep your stakeholders happy. You won’t regret it."

    Jeremy Roberts,

    Consulting Analyst, Infrastructure Practice

    Info-Tech Research Group

    Availability and capacity management transcend IT

    This Research Is Designed For:

    ✓ CIOs who want to increase uptime and reduce costs

    ✓ Infrastructure managers who want to deliver increased value to the business

    ✓ Enterprise architects who want to ensure stability of core IT services

    ✓ Dedicated capacity managers

    This Research Will Help You:

    ✓ Develop a list of core services

    ✓ Establish visibility into your system

    ✓ Solicit business needs

    ✓ Project future demand

    ✓ Set SLAs

    ✓ Increase uptime

    ✓ Optimize spend

    This Research Will Also Assist:

    ✓ Project managers

    ✓ Service desk staff

    This Research Will Help Them:

    ✓ Plan IT projects

    ✓ Better manage availability incidents caused by lack of capacity

    Executive summary

    Situation

    • IT infrastructure leaders are responsible for ensuring that the business has access to the technology needed to keep the organization humming along. This requires managing capacity and availability.
    • Dependencies go undocumented. Services are provided on an ad hoc basis, and capacity/availability are managed reactively.

    Complication

    • Organizations are overprovisioning an average of 59% for compute, and 48% for storage. This is expensive. With budget pressure mounting, the cost of this approach can’t be ignored.
    • Lead time to respond to demand is long. Half of organizations have experienced capacity-related downtime, and almost 60% wait 3+ months for additional capacity. (451 Research, 3)

    Resolution

    • Conduct a business impact analysis to determine which of your services are most critical, and require active capacity management that will reap more in benefits than it produces in costs.
    • Establish visibility into your system. You can’t track what you can’t see, and you can’t see when you don’t have proper monitoring tools in place.
    • Develop an understanding of business needs. Use a combination of historical trend analyses and consultation with line of business and project managers to separate wants from needs. Overprovisioning used to be necessary, but is no longer required.
    • Project future needs in line with your hardware lifecycle. Never suffer availability issues as a result of a lack of capacity again.

    Info-Tech Insight

    1. Components are critical. The business doesn’t care about components. You, however, are not so lucky…
    2. Ask what the business is working on, not what they need. If you ask them what they need, they’ll tell you – and it won’t be cheap. Find out what they’re going to do, and use your expertise to service those needs.
    3. Cloud shmoud. The role of the capacity manager is changing with the cloud, but capacity management is as important as ever.

    Save money and drive efficiency with an effective availability and capacity management plan

    Overprovisioning happens because of the old style of infrastructure provisioning (hardware refresh cycles) and because capacity managers don’t know how much they need (either as a result of inaccurate or nonexistent information).

    According to 451 Research, 59% of enterprises have had to wait 3+ months for new capacity. It is little wonder, then, that so many opt to overprovision. Capacity management is about ensuring that IT services are available, and with lead times like that, overprovisioning can be more attractive than the alternative. Fortunately there is hope. An effective availability and capacity management plan can help you:

    • Identify your gold systems
    • Establish visibility into them
    • Project your future capacity needs

    Balancing overprovisioning and spending is the capacity manager’s struggle.

    Availability and capacity management go together like boots and feet

    Availability and capacity are not the same, but they are related and can be effectively managed together as part of a single process.

    If an IT department is unable to meet demand due to insufficient capacity, users will experience downtime or a degradation in service. To be clear, capacity is not the only factor in availability – reliability, serviceability, etc. are significant as well. But no organization can effectively manage availability without paying sufficient attention to capacity.

    "Availability Management is concerned with the design, implementation, measurement and management of IT services to ensure that the stated business requirements for availability are consistently met."

    – OGC, Best Practice for Service Delivery, 12

    "Capacity management aims to balance supply and demand [of IT storage and computing services] cost-effectively…"

    – OGC, Business Perspective, 90

    Integrate the three levels of capacity management

    Successful capacity management involves a holistic approach that incorporates all three levels.

    Business The highest level of capacity management, business capacity management, involves predicting changes in the business’ needs and developing requirements in order to make it possible for IT to adapt to those needs. Influx of new clients from a failed competitor.
    Service Service capacity management focuses on ensuring that IT services are monitored to determine if they are meeting pre-determined SLAs. The data gathered here can be used for incident and problem management. Increased website traffic.
    Component Component capacity management involves tracking the functionality of specific components (servers, hard drives, etc.), and effectively tracking their utilization and performance, and making predictions about future concerns. Insufficient web server compute.

    The C-suite cares about business capacity as part of the organization’s strategic planning. Service leads care about their assigned services. IT infrastructure is concerned with components, but not for their own sake. Components mean services that are ultimately designed to facilitate business.

    A healthcare organization practiced poor capacity management and suffered availability issues as a result

    CASE STUDY

    Industry: Healthcare

    Source: Interview

    New functionalities require new infrastructure

    There was a project to implement an elastic search feature. This had to correlate all the organization’s member data from an Oracle data source and their own data warehouse, and pool them all into an elastic search index so that it could be used by the provider portal search function. In estimating the amount of space needed, the infrastructure team assumed that all the data would be shared in a single place. They didn’t account for the architecture of elastic search in which indexes are shared across multiple nodes and shards are often split up separately.

    Beware underestimating demand and hardware sourcing lead times

    As a result, they vastly underestimated the amount of space that was needed and ended up short by a terabyte. The infrastructure team frantically sourced more hardware, but the rush hardware order arrived physically damaged and had to be returned to the vendor.

    Sufficient budget won’t ensure success without capacity planning

    The project’s budget had been more than sufficient to pay for the extra necessary capacity, but because a lack of understanding of the infrastructure impact resulted in improper forecasting, the project ended up stuck in a standstill.

    Manage availability and keep your stakeholders happy

    If you run out of capacity, you will inevitably encounter availability issues like downtime and performance degradation . End users do not like downtime, and neither do their managers.

    There are three variables that are monitored, measured, and analyzed as part of availability management more generally (Valentic).

      1. Uptime:

    The availability of a system is the percentage of time the system is “up,” (and not degraded) which can be calculated using the following formula: uptime/(uptime + downtime) x 100%. The more components there are in a system, the lower the availability, as a rule.

      1. Reliability:

    The length of time a component/service can go before there is an outage that brings it down, typically measured in hours.

      1. Maintainability:

    The amount of time it takes for a component/service to be restored in the event of an outage, also typically measured in hours.

    Enter the cloud: changes in the capacity manager role

    There can be no doubt – the rise of the public cloud has fundamentally changed the nature of capacity management.

    Features of the public cloudImplications for capacity management
    Instant, or near-instant, instantiation Lead times drop; capacity management is less about ensuring equipment arrives on time.
    Pay-as-you go services Capacity no longer needs to be purchased in bulk. Pay only for what you use and shut down instances that are no longer necessary.
    Essentially unlimited scalability Potential capacity is infinite, but so are potential costs.
    Offsite hosting Redundancy, but at the price of the increasing importance of your internet connection.

    Vendors will sell you the cloud as a solution to your capacity/availability problems

    The image contains two graphs. The first graph on the left is titled: Reactive Management, and shows the struggling relationship between capacity and demand. The second graph on the right is titled: Cloud future (ideal), which demonstrates a manageable relationship between capacity and demand over time.

    Traditionally, increases in capacity have come in bursts as a reaction to availability issues. This model inevitably results in overprovisioning, driving up costs. Access to the cloud changes the equation. On-demand capacity means that, ideally, nobody should pay for unused capacity.

    Reality check: even in the cloud era, capacity management is necessary

    You will likely find vendors to nurture the growth of a gap between your expectations and reality. That can be damaging.

    The cloud reality does not look like the cloud ideal. Even with the ostensibly elastic cloud, vendors like the consistency that longer-term contracts offer. Enter reserved instances: in exchange for lower hourly rates, vendors offer the option to pay a fee for a reserved instance. Usage beyond the reserved will be billed at a higher hourly rate. In order to determine where that line should be drawn, you should engage in detailed capacity planning. Unfortunately, even when done right, this process will result in some overprovisioning, though it does provide convenience from an accounting perspective. The key is to use spot instances where demand is exceptional and bounded. Example: A university registration server that experiences exceptional demand at the start of term but at no other time.

    The image contains an example of cloud reality not matching with the cloud ideal in the form of a graph. The graph is split horizontally, the top half is red, and there is a dotted line splitting it from the lower half. The line is labelled: Reserved instance ceiling. In the bottom half, it is the colour green and has a curving line.

    Use best practices to optimize your cloud resources

    The image contains two graphs. The graph on the left is labelled: Ineffective reserve capacity. At the top of the graph is a dotted line labelled: Reserved Instance ceiling. The graph is measuring capacity requirements over time. There is a curved line on the graph that suddenly spikes and comes back down. The spike is labelled unused capacity. The graph on the right is labelled: Effective reserve capacity. The reserved instance ceiling is about halfway down this graph, and it is comparing capacity requirements over time. This graph has a curved line on it, also has a spike and is labelled: spot instance.

    Even in the era of elasticity, capacity planning is crucial. Spot instances – the spikes in the graph above – are more expensive, but if your capacity needs vary substantially, reserving instances for all of the space you need can cost even more money. Efficiently planning capacity will help you draw this line.

    Evaluate business impact; not all systems are created equal

    Limited resources are a reality. Detailed visibility into every single system is often not feasible and could be too much information.

    Simple and effective. Sometimes a simple display can convey all of the information necessary to manage critical systems. In cars it is important to know your speed, how much fuel is in the tank, and whether or not you need to change your oil/check your engine.

    Where to begin?! Specialized information is sometimes necessary, but it can be difficult to navigate.

    Take advantage of a business impact analysis to define and understand your critical services

    Ideally, downtime would be minimal. In reality, though, downtime is a part of IT life. It is important to have realistic expectations about its nature and likelihood.

    STEP 1

    STEP 2

    STEP 3

    STEP 4

    STEP 5

    Record applications and dependencies

    Utilize your asset management records and document the applications and systems that IT is responsible for managing and recovering during a disaster.

    Define impact scoring scale

    Ensure an objective analysis of application criticality by establishing a business impact scale that applies to all applications.

    Estimate impact of downtime

    Leverage the scoring criteria from the previous step and establish an estimated impact of downtime for each application.

    Identify desired RTO and RPO

    Define what the RTOs/RPOs should be based on the impact of a business interruption and the tolerance for downtime and data loss.

    Determine current RTO/RPO

    Conduct tabletop planning and create a flowchart of your current capabilities. Compare your current state to the desired state from the previous step.

    Info-Tech Insight

    According to end users, every system is critical and downtime is intolerable. Of course, once they see how much totally eliminating downtime can cost, they might change their tune. It is important to have this discussion to separate the critical from the less critical – but still important – services.

    Establish visibility into critical systems

    You may have seen “If you can’t measure it, you can’t manage it” or a variation thereof floating around the internet. This adage is consumable and makes sense…doesn’t it?

    "It is wrong to suppose that if you can’t measure it, you can’t manage it – a costly myth."

    – W. Edwards Deming, statistician and management consultant, author of The New Economics

    While it is true that total monitoring is not absolutely necessary for management, when it comes to availability and capacity – objectively quantifiable service characteristics – a monitoring strategy is unavoidable. Capturing fluctuations in demand, and adjusting for those fluctuations, is among the most important functions of a capacity manager, even if hovering over employees with a stopwatch is poor management.

    Solicit needs from line of business managers

    Unless you head the world’s most involved IT department (kudos if you do) you’re going to have to determine your needs from the business.

    Do

    Do not

    ✓ Develop a positive relationship with business leaders responsible for making decisions.

    ✓ Make yourself aware of ongoing and upcoming projects.

    ✓ Develop expertise in organization-specific technology.

    ✓ Make the business aware of your expenses through chargebacks or showbacks.

    ✓ Use your understanding of business projects to predict business needs; do not rely on business leaders’ technical requests alone.

    X Be reactive.

    X Accept capacity/availability demands uncritically.

    X Ask line of business managers for specific computing requirements unless they have the technical expertise to make informed judgments.

    X Treat IT as an opaque entity where requests go in and services come out (this can lead to irresponsible requests).

    Demand: manage or be managed

    You might think you can get away with uncritically accepting your users’ demands, but this is not best practice. If you provide it, they will use it.

    The company meeting

    “I don’t need this much RAM,” the application developer said, implausibly. Titters wafted above the assembled crowd as her IT colleagues muttered their surprise. Heads shook, eyes widened. In fact, as she sat pondering her utterance, the developer wasn’t so sure she believed it herself. Noticing her consternation, the infrastructure manager cut in and offered the RAM anyway, forestalling the inevitable crisis that occurs when seismic internal shifts rock fragile self-conceptions. Until next time, he thought.

    "Work expands as to fill the resources available for its completion…"

    – C. Northcote Parkinson, quoted in Klimek et al.

    Combine historical data with the needs you’ve solicited to holistically project your future needs

    Predicting the future is difficult, but when it comes to capacity management, foresight is necessary.

    Critical inputs

    In order to project your future needs, the following inputs are necessary.

    1. Usage trends: While it is true that past performance is no indication of future demand, trends are still a good way to validate requests from the business.
    2. Line of business requests: An understanding of the projects the business has in the pipes is important for projecting future demand.
    3. Institutional knowledge: Read between the lines. As experts on information technology, the IT department is well-equipped to translate needs into requirements.
    The image contains a graph that is labelled: Projected demand, and graphs demand over time. There is a curved line that passes through a vertical line labelled present. There is a box on top of the graph that contains the text: Note: confidence in demand estimates will very by service and by stakeholder.

    Follow best practice guidelines to maximize the efficiency of your availability and capacity management process

    The image contains Info-Tech's IT Management & Governance Framework. The framework displays many of Info-Tech's research to help optimize and improve core IT processes. The name of this blueprint is under the Infrastructure & Operations section, and has been circled to point out where it is in the framework.

    Understand how the key frameworks relate and interact

    The image contains a picture of the COBIT 5 logo.

    BA104: Manage availability and capacity

    • Current state assessment
    • Forecasting based on business requirements
    • Risk assessment of planning and implementation of requirements
    The image contains a picture of the ITIL logo

    Availability management

    • Determine business requirements
    • Match requirements to capabilities
    • Address any mismatch between requirements and capabilities in a cost-effective manner

    Capacity management

    • Monitoring services and components
    • Tuning for efficiency
    • Forecasting future requirements
    • Influencing demand
    • Producing a capacity plan
    The image contains a picture of Info-Tech Research Group logo.

    Availability and capacity management

    • Conduct a business impact analysis
    • Establish visibility into critical systems
    • Solicit and incorporate business needs
    • Identify and mitigate risks

    Disaster recovery and business continuity planning are forms of availability management

    The scope of this project is managing day-to-day availability, largely but not exclusively, in the context of capacity. For additional important information on availability, see the following Info-Tech projects.

      • Develop a Business Continuity Plan

    If your focus is on ensuring process continuity in the event of a disaster.

      • Establish a Program to Enable Effective Performance Monitoring

    If your focus is on flow mapping and transaction monitoring as part of a plan to engage APM vendors.

      • Create a Right-Sized Disaster Recovery Plan

    If your focus is on hardening your IT systems against major events.

    Info-Tech’s approach to availability and capacity management is stakeholder-centered and cloud ready

    Phase 1:

    Conduct a business impact analysis

    Phase 2:

    Establish visibility into core systems

    Phase 3:

    Solicit and incorporate business needs

    Phase 4:

    Identify and mitigate risks

    1.1 Conduct a business impact analysis

    1.2 Assign criticality ratings to services

    2.1 Define your monitoring strategy

    2.2 Implement monitoring tool/aggregator

    3.1 Solicit business needs

    3.2 Analyze data and project future needs

    4.1 Identify and mitigate risks

    Deliverables

    • Business impact analysis
    • Gold systems
    • Monitoring strategy
    • List of stakeholders
    • Business needs
    • Projected capacity needs
    • Risks and mitigations
    • Capacity management summary cards

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    “Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful.”

    Guided Implementation

    “Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track.”

    Workshop

    “We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place.”

    Consulting

    “Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project.”

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

    Availability & capacity management – project overview

     

    Conduct a business impact analysis

    Establish visibility into core systems

    Solicit and incorporate business needs

    Identify and
    mitigate risks

    Best-Practice Toolkit

    1.1 Create a scale to measure different levels of impact

    1.2 Assign criticality ratings to services

    2.1 Define your monitoring strategy

    2.2 Implement your monitoring tool/aggregator

    3.1 Solicit business needs and gather data

    3.2 Analyze data and project future needs

    4.1 Identify and mitigate risks

    Guided Implementations

    Call 1: Conduct a business impact analysis Call 1: Discuss your monitoring strategy

    Call 1: Develop a plan to gather historical data; set up plan to solicit business needs

    Call 2: Evaluate data sources

    Call 1: Discuss possible risks and strategies for risk mitigation

    Call 2: Review your capacity management plan

    Onsite Workshop

    Module 1:

    Conduct a business impact analysis

    Module 2:

    Establish visibility into core systems

    Module 3:

    Develop a plan to project future needs

    Module 4:

    Identify and mitigate risks

     

    Phase 1 Results:

    • RTOs/RPOs
    • List of gold systems
    • Criticality matrix

    Phase 2 Results:

    • Capacity/availability monitoring strategy

    Phase 3 Results:

    • Plan for soliciting future needs
    • Future needs

    Phase 4 Results:

    • Strategies for reducing risks
    • Capacity management plan

    Workshop overview

    Contact your account representative or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

     

    Workshop Day 1

    Workshop Day 2

    Workshop Day 3

    Workshop Day 4

     

    Conduct a business
    impact analysis

    Establish visibility into
    core systems

    Solicit and incorporate business needs

    Identify and mitigate risks

    Activities

    1.1 Conduct a business impact analysis

    1.2 Create a list of critical dependencies

    1.3 Identify critical sub-components

    1.4 Develop best practices to negotiate SLAs

    2.1 Determine indicators for sub-components

    2.2 Establish visibility into components

    2.3 Develop strategies to ameliorate visibility issues

    3.1 Gather relevant business-level data

    3.2 Gather relevant service-level data

    3.3 Analyze historical trends

    3.4 Build a list of business stakeholders

    3.5 Directly solicit requirements from the business

    3.6 Map business needs to technical requirements

    3.7 Identify inefficiencies and compare historical data

    • 4.1 Brainstorm potential causes of availability and capacity risk
    • 4.2 Identify and mitigate capacity risks
    • 4.3 Identify and mitigate availability risks

    Deliverables

    1. Business impact analysis
    2. List of gold systems
    3. SLA best practices
    1. Sub-component metrics
    2. Strategy to establish visibility into critical sub-components
    1. List of stakeholders
    2. Business requirements
    3. Technical requirements
    4. Inefficiencies
    1. Strategies for mitigating risks
    2. Completed capacity management plan template

    PHASE 1

    Conduct a Business Impact Analysis

    Step 1.1: Conduct a business impact analysis

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Record applications and dependencies in the Business Impact Analysis Tool.
    • Define a scale to estimate the impact of various applications’ downtime.
    • Estimate the impact of applications’ downtime.

    This involves the following participants:

    • Capacity manager
    • Infrastructure team

    Outcomes of this step

    • Estimated impact of downtime for various applications

    Execute a business impact analysis (BIA) as part of a broader availability plan

    1.1a Business Impact Analysis Tool

    Business impact analyses are an invaluable part of a broader IT strategy. Conducting a BIA benefits a variety of processes, including disaster recovery, business continuity, and availability and capacity management

    STEP 1

    STEP 2

    STEP 3

    STEP 4

    STEP 5

    Record applications and dependencies

    Utilize your asset management records and document the applications and systems that IT is responsible for managing and recovering during a disaster.

    Define impact scoring scale

    Ensure an objective analysis of application criticality by establishing a business impact scale that applies to all applications.

    Estimate impact of downtime

    Leverage the scoring criteria from the previous step and establish an estimated impact of downtime for each application.

    Identify desired RTO and RPO

    Define what the RTOs/RPOs should be based on the impact of a business interruption and the tolerance for downtime and data loss.

    Determine current RTO/RPO

    Conduct tabletop planning and create a flowchart of your current capabilities. Compare your current state to the desired state from the previous step.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Engaging in detailed capacity planning for an insignificant service draws time and resources away from more critical capacity planning exercises. Time spent tracking and planning use of the ancient fax machine in the basement is time you’ll never get back.

    Control the scope of your availability and capacity management planning project with a business impact analysis

    Don’t avoid conducting a BIA because of a perception that it’s too onerous or not necessary. If properly managed, as described in this blueprint, the BIA does not need to be onerous and the benefits are tangible.

    A BIA enables you to identify appropriate spend levels, continue to drive executive support, and prioritize disaster recovery planning for a more successful outcome. For example, an Info-Tech survey found that a BIA has a significant impact on setting appropriate recovery time objectives (RTOs) and appropriate spending.

    The image contains a graph that is labelled: BIA Impact on Appropriate RTOS. With no BIA, there is 59% RTOs are appropriate. With BIA, there is 93% RTOS being appropriate. The image contains a graph that is labelled: BIA Impact on Appropriate Spending. No BIA has 59% indication that BCP is cost effective. With a BIA there is 86% indication that BCP is cost effective.

    Terms

    No BIA: lack of a BIA, or a BIA bases solely on the perceived importance of IT services.

    BIA: based on a detailed evaluation or estimated dollar impact of downtime.

    Source: Info-Tech Research Group; N=70

    Select the services you wish to evaluate with the Business Impact Analysis Tool

    1.1b 1 hour

    In large organizations especially, collating an exhaustive list of applications and services is going to be onerous. For the purposes of this project, a subset should suffice.

    Instructions

    1. Gather a diverse group of IT staff and end users in a room with a whiteboard.
    2. Solicit feedback from the group. Questions to ask:
    • What services do you regularly use? What do you see others using? (End users)
    • Which service inspires the greatest number of service calls? (IT)
    • What services are you most excited about? (Management)
    • What services are the most critical for business operations? (Everybody)
  • Record these applications in the Business Impact Analysis Tool.
  • Input

    • Applications/services

    Output

    • Candidate applications for the business impact analysis

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers

    Participants

    • Infrastructure manager
    • Enterprise architect
    • Application owners
    • End users

    Info-Tech Insight

    Include a variety of services in your analysis. While it might be tempting to jump ahead and preselect important applications, don’t. The process is inherently valuable, and besides, it might surprise you.

    Record the applications and dependencies in the BIA tool

    1.1c Use tab 1 of the Business Impact Analysis Tool

    1. In the Application/System column, list the applications identified for this pilot as well as the Core Infrastructure category. Also indicate the Impact on the Business and Business Owner.
    2. List the dependencies for each application in the appropriate columns:
    • Hosted On-Premises (In-House) – If the physical equipment is in a facility you own, record it here, even if it is managed by a vendor.
    • Hosted by a Co-Lo/MSP – List any dependencies hosted by a co-lo/MSP vendor.
    • Cloud (includes "as a Service”) – List any dependencies hosted by a cloud vendor.

    Note: If there are no dependencies for a particular category, leave it blank.

  • If you wish to highlight specific dependencies, put an asterisk in front of them (e.g. *SAN). This will cause the dependency to be highlighted in the remaining tabs in this tool.
  • Add comments as needed in the Notes columns. For example, for equipment that you host in-house but is remotely managed by an MSP, specify this in the notes. Similarly, note any DR support services.
  • Example

    The image contains a screenshot of Info-Tech's Business Impact Analysis Tool specifically tab 1.

    ID is optional. It is a sequential number by default.

    In-House, Co-Lo/MSP, and Cloud dependencies; leave blank if not applicable.

    Add notes as applicable – e.g. critical support services.

    Define a scoring scale to estimate different levels of impact

    1.1d Use tab 2 of the Business Impact Analysis Tool

    Modify the Business Impact Scales headings and Overall Criticality Rating terminology to suit your organization. For example, if you don’t have business partners, use that column to measure a different goodwill impact or just ignore that column in this tool (i.e. leave it blank). Estimate the different levels of potential impact (where four is the highest impact and zero is no impact) and record these in the Business Impact Scales columns.

    The image contains a screenshot of Info-Tech's Business Impact Analysis Tool, specifically tab 2.

    Estimate the impact of downtime for each application

    1.1e Use tab 3 of the Business Impact Analysis Tool

    In the BIA tab columns for Direct Costs of Downtime, Impact on Goodwill, and Additional Criticality Factors, use the drop-down menu to assign a score of zero to four based on levels of impact defined in the Scoring Criteria tab. For example, if an organization’s ERP is down, and that affects call center sales operations (e.g. ability to access customer records and process orders), the impact might be as described below:

      • Loss of Revenue might score a two or three depending on the proportion of overall sales lost due to the downtime.
      • The Impact on Customers might be a one or two depending on the extent that existing customers might be using the call center to purchase new products or services, and are frustrated by the inability to process orders.
      • The Legal/Regulatory Compliance and Health or Safety Risk might be a zero.

    On the other hand, if payroll processing is down, this may not impact revenue, but it certainly impacts internal goodwill and productivity.

    Rank service criticality: gold, silver, and bronze

    Gold

    Mission critical services. An outage is catastrophic in terms of cost or public image/goodwill. Example: trading software at a financial institution.

    Silver

    Important to daily operations, but not mission critical. Example: email services at any large organization.

    Bronze

    Loss of these services is an inconvenience more than anything, though they do serve a purpose and will be missed if they are never brought back online. Example: ancient fax machines.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Info-Tech recommends gold, silver, and bronze because of this typology’s near universal recognition. If you would prefer a particular designation (it might help with internal comprehension), don’t hesitate to use that one instead.

    Use the results of the business impact analysis to sort systems based on their criticality

    1.1f 1 hour

    Every organization has its own rules about how to categorize service importance. For some (consumer-facing businesses, perhaps) reputational damage may trump immediate costs.

    Instructions

    1. Gather a group of key stakeholders and project the completed Business Impact Analysis Tool onto a screen for them.
    2. Share the definitions of gold, silver, and bronze services with them (if they are not familiar), and begin sorting the services by category,
    • How long would it take to notice if a particular service went out?
    • How important are the non-quantifiable damages that could come with an outage?
  • Sort the services into gold, silver, and bronze on a whiteboard, with sticky notes, or with chart paper.
  • Verify your findings and record them in section 2.1 of the Capacity Plan Template.
  • Input

    • Results of the business impact analysis exercise

    Output

    • List of gold, silver, and bronze systems

    Materials

    • Projector
    • Business Impact Analysis Tool
    • Capacity Plan Template

    Participants

    • Infrastructure manager
    • Enterprise architect

    Leverage the rest of the BIA tool as part of your disaster recovery planning

    Disaster recovery planning is a critical activity, and while it is a sort of availability management, it is beyond this project’s scope. You can complete the business impact analysis (including RTOs and RPOs) for the complete disaster recovery package.

    See Info-Tech’s Create a Right-Sized Disaster Recovery Plan blueprint for instructions on how to complete your business impact analysis.

    Step 1.2: Assign criticality ratings to services

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Create a list of dependencies for your most important applications.
    • Identify important sub-components.
    • Use best practices to develop and negotiate SLAs.

    This involves the following participants:

    • Capacity manager
    • Infrastructure team

    Outcomes of this step

    • List of dependencies of most important applications
    • List of important sub-components
    • SLAs based on best practices

    Determine the base unit of the capacity you’re looking to purchase

    Not every IT organization should approach capacity the same way. Needs scale, and larger organizations will inevitably deal in larger quantities.

    Large cloud provider

    Local traditional business

    • Thousands of servers housed in a number of datacenters around the world.
    • Dedicated capacity manager.
    • Purchases components from OEMs in bulk as part of bespoke contracts that are worth many millions of dollars over time.
    • May deal with components at a massive scale (dozens of servers at once, for example).
    • A small server room that runs non-specialized services (email, for example).
    • Barely even a dedicated IT person, let alone an IT capacity manager.
    • Purchases new components from resellers or even retail stores.
    • Deals with components at a small scale (a single switch here, a server upgrade there).

    "Cloud capacity management is not exactly the same as the ITIL version because ITIL has a focus on the component level. I actually don’t do that, because if I did I’d go crazy. There’s too many components in a cloud environment."

    – Richie Mendoza, IT Consultant, SMITS Inc.

    Consider the relationship between component capacity and service capacity

    End users’ thoughts about IT are based on what they see. They are, in other words, concerned with service availability: does the organization have the ability to provide access to needed services?

    Service

    • Email
    • CRM
    • ERP

    Component

    • Switch
    • SMTP server
    • Archive database
    • Storage

    "You don’t ask the CEO or the guy in charge ‘What kind of response time is your requirement?’ He doesn’t really care. He just wants to make sure that all his customers are happy."

    – Todd Evans, Capacity and Performance Management SME, IBM.

    One telco solved its availability issues by addressing component capacity issues

    CASE STUDY

    Industry: Telecommunications

    Source: Interview

    Coffee and Wi-Fi – a match made in heaven

    In tens of thousands of coffee shops around the world, patrons make ample use of complimentary Wi-Fi. Wi-Fi is an important part of customers’ coffee shop experience, whether they’re online to check their email, do a YouTube, or update their Googles. So when one telco that provided Wi-Fi access for thousands of coffee shops started encountering availability issues, the situation was serious.

    Wi-Fi, whack-a-mole, and web woes

    The team responsible for resolving the issue took an ad hoc approach to resolving complaints, fixing issues as they came up instead of taking a systematic approach.

    Resolution

    Looking at the network as a whole, the capacity manager took a proactive approach by using data to identify and rank the worst service areas, and then directing the team responsible to fix those areas in order of the worst first, then the next worst, and so on. Soon the availability of Wi-Fi service was restored across the network.

    Create a list of dependencies for your most important applications

    1.2a 1.5 hours

    Instructions

    1. Work your way down the list of services outlined in step 1, starting with your gold systems. During the first iteration of this exercise select only 3-5 of your most important systems.
    2. Write the name of each application on a sticky note or at the top of a whiteboard (leaving ample space below for dependency mapping).
    3. In the first tier below the application, include the specific services that the general service provides.
    • This will vary based on the service in question, but an example for email is sending, retrieving, retrieving online, etc.
  • For each of the categories identified in step 3, identify the infrastructure components that are relevant to that system. Be broad and sweeping; if the component is involved in the service, include it here. The goal is to be exhaustive.
  • Leave the final version of the map intact. Photographing or making a digital copy for posterity. It will be useful in later activities.
  • Input

    • List of important applications

    Output

    • List of critical dependencies

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers
    • Sticky notes

    Participants

    • Infrastructure manager
    • Enterprise architect

    Info-Tech Insight

    Dependency mapping can be difficult. Make sure you don’t waste effort creating detailed dependency maps for relatively unimportant services.

    Dependency mapping can be difficult. Make sure you don’t waste effort creating detailed dependency maps for relatively unimportant services.

    The image contains a sample dependency map on ride sharing. Ride Sharing has been split between two categories: Application and Drivers. Under drivers it branches out to: Availability, Car, and Pay. Under Application, it branches out to: Compute, Network, Edge devices, Q/A maintenance, and Storage. Compute branches out to Cloud Services. Network branches out to Cellular network and Local. Edge Devices branch out to Drivers and Users. Q/A maintenance does not have a following branch. Storage branches out to Storage (Enterprise) and Storage (local).

    Ride sharing cannot work, at least not at maximum effectiveness, without these constituent components. When one or more of these components are absent or degraded, the service will become unavailable. This example illustrates some challenges of capacity management; some of these components are necessary, but beyond the ride-sharing company’s control.

    Leverage a sample dependency tree for a common service

    The image contains a sample dependency tree for the Email service. Email branches out to: Filtering, Archiving, Retrieval, and Send/receive. Filtering branches out to security appliance which then branches out to CPU, Storage, and Network. Archiving branches to Archive server, which branches out to CPU, Storage, and Network. Retrieval branches out to IMAP/PoP which branches out to CPU, Storage, and Network. Send/receive branches out to IMAP/PoP and SMTP. SMTP branches out to CPU, Storage and Network.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Email is an example here not because it is necessarily a “gold system,” but because it is common across industries. This is a useful exercise for any service, but it can be quite onerous, so it should be conducted on the most important systems first.

    Separate the wheat from the chaff; identify important sub-components and separate them from unimportant ones

    1.2b 1.5 hours

    Use the bottom layer of the pyramid drawn in step 1.2a for a list of important sub-components.

    Instructions

    1. Record a list of the gold services identified in the previous activity. Leave space next to each service for sub-components.
    2. Go through each relevant sub-component. Highlight those that are critical and could reasonably be expected to cause problems.
    • Has this sub-component caused a problem in the past?
    • Is this sub-component a bottleneck?
    • What could cause this component to fail? Is it such an occurrence feasible?
  • Record the results of the exercise (and the service each sub-component is tied to) in tab 2 (columns B &C) of the Capacity Snapshot Tool.
  • Input

    • List of important applications

    Output

    • List of critical dependencies

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers

    Participants

    • Infrastructure manager
    • Enterprise architect

    Understand availability commitments with SLAs

    With the rise of SaaS, cloud computing, and managed services, critical services and their components are increasingly external to IT.

    • IT’s lack of access to the internal working of services does not let them off the hook for performance issues (as much as that might be the dream).
    • Vendor management is availability management. Use the dependency map drawn earlier in this phase to highlight the components of critical services that rely on capacity that cannot be managed internally.
    • For each of these services ensure that an appropriate SLA is in place. When acquiring new services, ensure that the vendor SLA meets business requirements.

    The image contains a large blue circle labelled: Availability. Also in the blue circle is a small red circle labelled: Capacity.

    In terms of service provision, capacity management is a form of availability management. Not all availability issues are capacity issues, but the inverse is true.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Capacity issues will always cause availability issues, but availability issues are not inherently capacity issues. Availability problems can stem from outages unrelated to capacity (e.g. power or vendor outages).

    Use best practices to develop and negotiate SLAs

    1.2c 20 minutes per service

    When signing contracts with vendors, you will be presented with an SLA. Ensure that it meets your requirements.

    1. Use the business impact analysis conducted in this project’s first step to determine your requirements. How much downtime can you tolerate for your critical services?
    2. Once you have been presented with an SLA, be sure to scour it for tricks. Remember, just because a vendor offers “five nines” of availability doesn’t mean that you’ll actually get that much uptime. It could be that the vendor is comfortable eating the cost of downtime or that the contract includes provisions for planned maintenance. Whether or not the vendor anticipated your outage does little to mitigate the damage an outage can cause to your business, so be careful of these provisions.
    3. Ensure that the person ultimately responsible for the SLA (the approver) understands the limitations of the agreement and the implications for availability.

    Input

    • List of external component dependencies

    Output

    • SLA requirements

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers

    Participants

    • Infrastructure manager
    • Enterprise architect

    Info-Tech Insight

    Vendors are sometimes willing to eat the cost of violating SLAs if they think it will get them a contract. Be careful with negotiation. Just because the vendor says they can do something doesn’t make it true.

    Negotiate internal SLAs using Info-Tech’s rigorous process

    Talking past each other can drive misalignment between IT and the business, inconveniencing all involved. Quantify your needs through an internal SLA as part of a comprehensive availability management plan.

    See Info-Tech’s Improve IT-Business Alignment Through an Internal SLA blueprint for instructions on why you should develop internal SLAs and the potential benefits they bring.

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop.

    The image contains a picture of an Info-Tech analyst.

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech’s historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    1.2

    The image contains a screenshot of activity 1.2 as previously described above.

    Create a list of dependencies for your most important applications

    Using the results of the business impact analysis, the analyst will guide workshop participants through a dependency mapping exercise that will eventually populate the Capacity Plan Template.

    Phase 1 Guided Implementation

    Call 1-888-670-8889 or email GuidedImplementations@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Complete these steps on your own, or call us to complete a guided implementation. A guided implementation is a series of 2-3 advisory calls that help you execute each phase of a project. They are included in most advisory memberships.

    Guided Implementation 1: Conduct a business impact analysis

    Proposed Time to Completion: 1 week

    Step 1.1: Create a scale to measure different levels of impact

    Review your findings with an analyst

    Discuss how you arrived at the rating of your critical systems and their dependencies. Consider whether your external SLAs are appropriate.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Use the results of the business impact analysis to sort systems based on their criticality

    With these tools & templates:

    Business Impact Analysis Tool

    Step 1.2: Assign criticality ratings to services

    Review your findings with an analyst

    Discuss how you arrived at the rating of your critical systems and their dependencies. Consider whether your external SLAs are appropriate.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Create a list of dependencies for your most important applications
    • Identify important sub-components
    • Use best practices to develop and negotiate SLAs

    With these tools & templates:

    Capacity Snapshot Tool

    Phase 1 Results & Insights:

    • Engaging in detailed capacity planning for an insignificant service is a waste of resources. Focus on ensuring availability for your most critical systems.
    • Carefully evaluate vendors’ service offerings. Make sure the SLA works for you, and approach pie-in-the-sky promises with skepticism.

    PHASE 2

    Establish Visibility Into Core Systems

    Step 2.1: Define your monitoring strategy

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Determine the indicators you should be tracking for each sub-component.

    This involves the following participants:

    • Capacity manager
    • Infrastructure team

    Outcomes of this step

    • List of indicators to track for each sub-component

    Data has its significance—but also its limitations

    The rise of big data can be a boon for capacity managers, but be warned: not all data is created equal. Bad data can lead to bad decisions – and unemployed capacity managers.

    Your findings are only as good as your data. Remember: garbage in, garbage out. There are three characteristics of good data:*

    1. Accuracy: is the data exact and correct? More detail and confidence is better.
    2. Reliability: is the data consistent? In other words, if you run the same test twice will you get the same results?
    3. Validity: is the information gleaned believable and relevant?

    *National College of Teaching & Leadership, “Reliability and Validity”

    "Data is king. Good data is absolutely essential to [the capacity manager] role."

    – Adrian Blant, Independent Capacity Consultant, IT Capability Solutions

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Every organization’s data needs are different; your data needs are going to be dictated by your services, delivery model, and business requirements. Make sure you don’t confuse volume with quality, even if others in your organization make that mistake.

    Take advantage of technology to establish visibility into your systems

    Managing your availability and capacity involves important decisions about what to monitor and how thresholds should be set.

    • Use the list of critical applications developed through the business impact analysis and the list of components identified in the dependency mapping exercise to produce a plan for effectively monitoring component availability and capacity.
    • The nature of IT service provision – the multitude of vendors providing hardware and services necessary for even simple IT services to work effectively – means that it is unlikely that capacity management will be visible through a single pane of glass. In other words, “email” and “CRM” don’t have a defined capacity. It always depends.
    • Establishing visibility into systems involves identifying what needs to be tracked for each component.

    Too much monitoring can be as bad as the inverse

    In 2013, a security breach at US retailer Target compromised more than 70 million customers’ data. The company received an alert, but it was thought to be a false positive because the monitoring system produced so many false and redundant alerts. As a result of the daily deluge, staff did not respond to the breach in time.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Don’t confuse monitoring with management. While establishing visibility is a crucial step, it is only part of the battle. Move on to this project’s next phase to explore opportunities to improve your capacity/availability management process.

    Determine the indicators you should be tracking for each sub-component

    2.1a Tab 3 of the Capacity Snapshot Tool

    It is nearly impossible to overstate the importance of data to the process of availability and capacity management. But the wrong data will do you no good.

    Instructions

    1. Open the Capacity Snapshot Tool to tab 2. The tool should have been populated in step 1.2 as part of the component mapping exercise.
    2. For each service, determine which metric(s) would most accurately tell the component’s story. Consider the following questions when completing this activity (you may end up with more than one metric):
    • How would the component’s capacity be measured (storage space, RAM, bandwidth, vCPUs)?
    • Is the metric in question actionable?
  • Record each metric in the Metric column (D) of the Capacity Snapshot Tool. Use the adjacent column for any additional information on metrics.
  • Info-Tech Insight

    Bottlenecks are bad. Use the Capacity Snapshot Tool (or another tool like it) to ensure that when the capacity manager leaves (on vacation, to another role, for good) the knowledge that they have accumulated does not leave as well.

    Understand the limitations of this approach

    Although we’ve striven to make it as easy as possible, this process will inevitably be cumbersome for organizations with a complicated set of software, hardware, and cloud services.

    Tracking every single component in significant detail will produce a lot of noise for each bit of signal. The approach outlined here addresses that concern in two ways:

    • A focus on gold services
    • A focus on sub-components that have a reasonable likelihood of being problematic in the future.

    Despite this effort, however, managing capacity at the component level is a daunting task. Ultimately, tools provided by vendors like SolarWinds and AppDynamics will fill in some of the gaps. Nevertheless, an understanding of the conceptual framework underlying availability and capacity management is valuable.

    Step 2.2: Implement your monitoring tool/aggregator

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Clarify visibility.
    • Determine whether or not you have sufficiently granular visibility.
    • Develop strategies to .any visibility issues.

    This involves the following participants:

    • Capacity manager
    • Infrastructure team
    • Applications personnel

    Outcomes of this step

    • Method for measuring and monitoring critical sub-components

    Companies struggle with performance monitoring because 95% of IT shops don’t have full visibility into their environments

    CASE STUDY

    Industry: Financial Services

    Source: AppDynamics

    Challenge

    • Users are quick to provide feedback when there is downtime or application performance degradation.
    • The challenge for IT teams is that while they can feel the pain, they don’t have visibility into the production environment and thus cannot identify where the pain is coming from.
    • The most common solution that organizations rely on is leveraging the log files for issue diagnosis. However, this method is slow and often unable to pinpoint the problem areas, leading to delays in problem resolution.

    Solution

    • Application and infrastructure teams need to work together to develop infrastructure flow maps and transaction profiles.
    • These diagrams will highlight the path that each transaction travels across your infrastructure.
    • Ideally at this point, teams will also capture latency breakdowns across every tier that the business transaction flows through.
      • This will ultimately kick start the baselining process.

    Results

    • Ninety-five percent of IT departments don’t have full visibility into their production environment. As a result, a slow business transaction will often require a war-room approach where SMEs from across the organization gather to troubleshoot.
    • Having visibility into the production environment through infrastructure flow mapping and transaction profiling will help IT teams pinpoint problems.
      • At the very least, teams will be able to identify common problem areas and expedite the root-cause analysis process.

    Source: “Just how complex can a Login Transaction be? Answer: Very!,” AppDynamics

    Monitor your critical sub-components

    Establishing a monitoring plan for your capacity involves answering two questions: can I see what I need to see, and can I see it with sufficient granularity?

    • Having the right tool for the job is an important step towards effective capacity and availability management.
    • Application performance management tools (APMs) are essential to the process, but they tend to be highly specific and vertically oriented, like using a microscope.
    • Some product families can cover a wider range of capacity monitoring functions (SolarWinds, for example). It is still important, however, to codify your monitoring needs.

    "You don’t use a microscope to monitor an entire ant farm, but you might use many microscopes to monitor specific ants."

    – Fred Chagnon, Research Director, Infrastructure Practice, Info-Tech Research Group

    Monitor your sub-components: clarify visibility

    2.2a Tab 2 of the Capacity Snapshot Tool

    The next step in capacity management is establishing whether or not visibility (in the broad sense) is available into critical sub-components.

    Instructions

    1. Open the Capacity Snapshot Tool and record the list of sub-components identified in the previous step.
    2. For each sub-component answer the following question:
    • Do I have easy access to the information I need to monitor to ensure this component remains available?
  • Select “Yes” or “No” from the drop-down menus as appropriate. In the adjacent column record details about visibility into the component.
    • What tool provides the information? Where can it be found?

    The image contains a screenshot of Info-Tech's Capacity Snapshot Tool, Tab 2.

    Monitor your sub-components; determine whether or not you have sufficient granular visibility

    2.2b Tab 2 of the Capacity Snapshot Tool

    Like ideas and watches, not all types of visibility are created equal. Ensure that you have access to the right information to make capacity decisions.

    Instructions

    1. For each of the sub-components clarify the appropriate level of granularity for the visibility gained to be useful. In the case of storage, for example, is raw usage (in gigabytes) sufficient, or do you need a breakdown of what exactly is taking up the space? The network might be more complicated.
    2. Record the details of this ideation in the adjacent column.
    3. Select “Yes” or “No” from the drop-down menu to track the status of each sub-component.

    The image contains a picture of an iPhone storage screen where it breaks down the storage into the following categories: apps, media, photos, and other.

    For most mobile phone users, this breakdown is sufficient. For some, more granularity might be necessary.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Make note of monitoring tools and strategies. If anything changes, be sure to re-evaluate the visibility status. An outdated spreadsheet can lead to availability issues if management is unaware of looming problems.

    Develop strategies to ameliorate any visibility issues

    2.2c 1 hour

    The Capacity Snapshot Tool color-codes your components by status. Green – visibility and granularity are both sufficient; yellow – visibility exists, though not at sufficient granularity; and red – visibility does not exist at all.

    Instructions

    1. Write each of the yellow and red sub-components on a whiteboard or piece of chart paper.
    2. Brainstorm amelioration strategies for each of the problematic sub-components.
    • Does the current monitoring tool have sufficient functionality?
    • Does it need to be further configured/customized?
    • Do we need a whole new tool?
  • Record these strategies in the Amelioration Strategy column on tab 4 of the tool.
  • Input

    • Sub-components
    • Capacity Snapshot Tool

    Output

    • Amelioration strategies

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers
    • Capacity Snapshot Tool

    Participants

    • Infrastructure manager

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    It might be that there is no amelioration strategy. Make note of this difficulty and highlight it as part of the risk section of the Capacity Plan Template.

    See Info-Tech’s projects on storage and network modernization for additional details

    Leverage other products for additional details on how to modernize your network and storage services.

    The process of modernizing the network is fraught with vestigial limitations. Develop a program to gather requirements and plan.

    As part of the blueprint, Modernize Enterprise Storage, the Modernize Enterprise Storage Workbook includes a section on storage capacity planning.

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop.

    The image contains a picture of an Info-Tech analyst.

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech’s historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    2.2

    The image contains a screenshot of activity 2.2.

    Develop strategies to ameliorate visibility issues

    The analyst will guide workshop participants in brainstorming potential solutions to visibility issues and record them in the Capacity Snapshot Tool.

    Phase 2 Guided Implementation

    Call 1-888-670-8889 or email GuidedImplementations@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Complete these steps on your own, or call us to complete a guided implementation. A guided implementation is a series of 2-3 advisory calls that help you execute each phase of a project. They are included in most advisory memberships.

    Guided Implementation 2: Establish visibility into core systems

    Proposed Time to Completion: 3 weeks

    Step 2.1: Define your monitoring strategy

    Review your findings with an analyst

    Discuss your monitoring strategy and ensure you have sufficient visibility for the needs of your organization.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Determine the indicators you should be tracking for each sub-component

    With these tools & templates:

    • Capacity Snapshot Tool

    Step 2.2: Implement your monitoring tool/aggregator

    Review your findings with an analyst

    Discuss your monitoring strategy and ensure you have sufficient visibility for the needs of your organization.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Clarify visibility
    • Determine whether or not you have sufficiently granular visibility
    • Develop strategies to ameliorate any visibility issues

    With these tools & templates:

    • Capacity Snapshot Tool

    Phase 2 Results & Insights:

    • Every organization’s data needs are different. Adapt data gathering, reporting, and analysis according to your services, delivery model, and business requirements.
    • Don’t confuse monitoring with management. Build a system to turn reported data into useful information that feeds into the capacity management process.

    PHASE 3

    Solicit and Incorporate Business Needs

    Step 3.1: Solicit business needs and gather data

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Build relationships with business stakeholders.
    • Analyze usage data and identify trends.
    • Correlate usage trends with business needs.

    This involves the following participants:

    • Capacity manager
    • Infrastructure team members
    • Business stakeholders

    Outcomes of this step

    • System for involving business stakeholders in the capacity planning process
    • Correlated data on business level, service level, and infrastructure level capacity usage

    Summarize your capacity planning activities in the Capacity Plan Template

    The availability and capacity management summary card pictured here is a handy way to capture the results of the activities undertaken in the following phases. Note its contents carefully, and be sure to record specific outputs where appropriate. One such card should be completed for each of the gold services identified in the project’s first phase. Make note of the results of the activities in the coming phase, and populate the Capacity Snapshot Tool. These will help you populate the tool.

    The image contains a screenshot of Info-Tech's Capacity Plan Template.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    The Capacity Plan Template is designed to be a part of a broader mapping strategy. It is not a replacement for a dedicated monitoring tool.

    Analyze historical trends as a crucial source of data

    The first place to look for information about your organization is not industry benchmarks or your gut (though those might both prove useful).

    • Where better to look than internally? Use the data you’ve gathered from your APM tool or other sources to understand your historical capacity needs and to highlight any periods of unavailability.
    • Consider monitoring the status of the capacity of each of your crucial components. The nature of this monitoring will vary based on the component in question. It can range from a rough Excel sheet all the way to a dedicated application performance monitoring tool.

    "In all cases the very first thing to do is to look at trending…The old adage is ‘you don’t steer a boat by its wake,’ however it’s also true that if something is growing at, say, three percent a month and it has been growing at three percent a month for the last twelve months, there’s a fairly good possibility that it’s going to carry on going in that direction."

    – Mike Lynch, Consultant, CapacityIQ

    Gather relevant data at the business level

    3.1a 2 hours per service

    A holistic approach to capacity management involves peering beyond the beaded curtain partitioning IT from the rest of the organization and tracking business metrics.

    Instructions

    1. Your service/application owners know how changes in business activities impact their systems. Business level capacity management involves responding to those changes. Ask service/application owners what changes will impact their capacity. Examples include:
    • Business volume (net new customers, number of transactions)
    • Staff changes (new hires, exits, etc.)
  • For each gold service, brainstorm relevant metrics. How can you capture that change in business volume?
  • Record these metrics in the summary card of the Capacity Plan Template.
  • In the notes section of the summary card record whether or not you have access to the required business metric.
  • Input

    • Brainstorming
    • List of gold services

    Output

    • Business level data

    Materials

    • In-house solution or commercial tool

    Participants

    • Capacity manager
    • Application/service owners

    Gather relevant data at the service level

    3.1b 2 hours per service

    One level of abstraction down is the service level. Service level capacity management, recall that service level capacity management is about ensuring that IT is meeting SLAs in its service provision.

    Instructions

    1. There should be internal SLAs for each service IT offers. (If not, that’s a good place to start. See Info-Tech’s research on the subject.) Prod each of your service owners for information on the metrics that are relevant for their SLAs. Consider the following:
    • Peak hours, requests per second, etc.
    • This will usually include some APM data.
  • Record these metrics in the summary card of the Capacity Plan Template.
  • Include any visibility issues in the notes in a similar section of the Capacity Plan Template.
  • Input

    • Brainstorming
    • List of gold services

    Output

    • Service level data

    Materials

    • In-house solution or commercial tool

    Participants

    • Capacity manager
    • Application/service owners

    Leverage the visibility into your infrastructure components and compare all of your data over time

    You established visibility into your components in the second phase of this project. Use this data, and that gathered at the business and service levels, to begin analyzing your demand over time.

    • Different organizations will approach this issue differently. Those with a complicated service catalog and a dedicated capacity manager might employ a tool like TeamQuest. If your operation is small, or you need to get your availability and capacity management activities underway as quickly as possible, you might consider using a simple spreadsheet software like Excel.
    • If you choose the latter option, select a level of granularity (monthly, weekly, etc.) and produce a line graph in Excel.
    • Example: Employee count (business metric)

    Jan

    Feb

    Mar

    Apr

    May

    June

    July

    74

    80

    79

    83

    84

    100

    102

    The image contains a graph using the example of employee count described above.

    Note: the strength of this approach is that it is easy to visualize. Use the same timescale to facilitate simple comparison.

    Manage, don’t just monitor; mountains of data need to be turned into information

    Information lets you make a decision. Understand the questions you don’t need to ask, and ask the right ones.

    "Often what is really being offered by many analytics solutions is just more data or information – not insights."

    – Brent Dykes, Director of Data Strategy, Domo

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    You can have all the data in the world and absolutely nothing valuable to add. Don’t fall for this trap. Use the activities in this phase to structure your data collection operation and ensure that your organization’s availability and capacity management plan is data driven.

    Analyze historical trends and track your services’ status

    3.1c Tab 3 of the Capacity Snapshot Tool

    At-a-glance – it’s how most executives consume all but the most important information. Create a dashboard that tracks the status of your most important systems.

    Instructions

    1. Consult infrastructure leaders for information about lead times for new capacity for relevant sub-components and include that information in the tool.
    • Look to historical lead times. (How long does it traditionally take to get more storage?)
    • If you’re not sure, contact an in-house expert, or speak to your vendor
  • Use tab 3 of the tool to record whether your existing capacity will be exceeded before you can stand more hardware up (red), you have a plan to ameliorate capacity issues but new capacity is not yet in place (yellow), or if you are not slated to run out of capacity any time soon (green).
  • Repeat the activity regularly. Include notes about spikes that might present capacity challenges, and information about when capacity may run out.
  • This tool collates and presents information gathered from other sources. It is not a substitute for a performance monitoring tool.

    Build a list of key business stakeholders

    3.1d 10 minutes

    Stakeholder analysis is crucial. Lines of authority can be diffuse. Understand who needs to be involved in the capacity management process early on.

    Instructions

    1. With the infrastructure team, brainstorm a group of departments, roles, and people who may impact demand on capacity.
    2. Go through the list with your team and identify stakeholders from two groups:
    • Line of business: who in the business makes use of the service?
    • Application owner: who in IT is responsible for ensuring the service is up?
  • Insert the list into section 3 of the Capacity Plan Template, and update as needed.
  • Input

    • Gold systems
    • Personnel Information

    Output

    • List of key business stakeholders

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers

    Participants

    • Capacity manager
    • Infrastructure staff

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Consider which departments are most closely aligned with the business processes that fuel demand. Prioritize those that have the greatest impact. Consider the stakeholders who will make purchasing decisions for increasing infrastructure capacity.

    Organize stakeholder meetings

    3.1e 10 hours

    Establishing a relationship with your stakeholders is a necessary step in managing your capacity and availability.

    Instructions

    1. Gather as many of the stakeholders identified in the previous activity as you can and present information on availability and capacity management
    • If you can’t get everyone in the same room, a virtual meeting or even an email blast could get the job done.
  • Explain the importance of capacity and availability management
    • Consider highlighting the trade-offs between cost and availability.
  • Field any questions the stakeholders might have about the process. Be honest. The goal of this meeting is to build trust. This will come in handy when you’re gathering business requirements.
  • Propose a schedule and seek approval from all present. Include the results in section 3 of the Capacity Plan Template.
  • Input

    • List of business stakeholders
    • Hard work

    Output

    • Working relationship, trust
    • Regular meetings

    Materials

    • Work ethic
    • Executive brief

    Participants

    • Capacity manager
    • Business stakeholders

    Info-Tech Insight

    The best capacity managers develop new business processes that more closely align their role with business stakeholders. Building these relationships takes hard work, and you must first earn the trust of the business.

    Bake stakeholders into the planning process

    3.1f Ongoing

    Convince, don’t coerce. Stakeholders want the same thing you do. Bake them into the planning process as a step towards this goal.

    1. Develop a system to involve stakeholders regularly in the capacity planning process.
    • Your system will vary depending on the structure and culture of your organization.
    • See the case study on the following slide for ideas.
    • It may be as simple as setting a recurring reminder in your own calendar to touch base with stakeholders.
  • Liaise with stakeholders regularly to keep abreast of new developments.
    • Ensure stakeholders have reasonable expectations about IT’s available resources, the costs of providing capacity, and the lead times required to source additional needed capacity.
  • Draw on these stakeholders for the step “Gather information on business requirements” later in this phase.
  • Input

    • List of business stakeholders
    • Ideas

    Output

    • Capacity planning process that involves stakeholders

    Materials

    • Meeting rooms

    Participants

    • Capacity manager
    • Business stakeholders
    • Infrastructure team

    A capacity manager in financial services wrangled stakeholders and produced results

    CASE STUDY

    Industry: Financial Services

    Source: Interview

    In financial services, availability is king

    In the world of financial services, availability is absolutely crucial. High-value trades occur at all hours, and any institution that suffers outages runs the risk of losing tens of thousands of dollars, not to mention reputational damage.

    People know what they want, but sometimes they have to be herded

    While line of business managers and application owners understand the value of capacity management, it can be difficult to establish the working relationship necessary for a fruitful partnership.

    Proactively building relationships keeps services available

    He built relationships with all the department heads on the business side, and all the application owners.

    • He met with department heads quarterly.
    • He met with application owners and business liaisons monthly.

    He established a steering committee for capacity.

    He invited stakeholders to regular capacity planning meetings.

    • The first half of each meeting was high-level outlook, such as business volume and IT capacity utilization, and included stakeholders from other departments.
    • The second half of the meeting was more technical, serving the purpose for the infrastructure team.

    He scheduled lunch and learn sessions with business analysts and project managers.

    • These are the gatekeepers of information, and should know that IT needs to be involved when things come down the pipeline.

    Step 3.2: Analyze data and project future needs

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Solicit needs from the business.
    • Map business needs to technical requirements, and technical requirements to infrastructure requirements.
    • Identify inefficiencies in order to remedy them.
    • Compare the data across business, component, and service levels, and project your capacity needs.

    This involves the following participants:

    • Capacity manager
    • Infrastructure team members
    • Business stakeholders

    Outcomes of this step

    • Model of how business processes relate to technical requirements and their demand on infrastructure
    • Method for projecting future demand for your organization’s infrastructure
    • Comparison of current capacity usage to projected demand

    “Nobody tells me anything!” – the capacity manager’s lament

    Sometimes “need to know” doesn’t register with sales or marketing. Nearly every infrastructure manager can share a story about a time when someone has made a decision that has critically impacted IT infrastructure without letting anyone in IT in on the “secret.”

    In brief

    The image contains a picture of a man appearing to be overwhelmed.

    Imagine working for a media company as an infrastructure capacity manager. Now imagine that the powers that be have decided to launch a content-focused web service. Seems like something they would do, right? Now imagine you find out about it the same way the company’s subscribers do. This actually happened – and it shouldn’t have. But a similar lack of alignment makes this a real possibility for any organization. If you don’t establish a systematic plan for soliciting and incorporating business requirements, prepare to lose a chunk of your free time. The business should never be able to say, in response to “nobody tells me anything,” “nobody asked.”

    Pictured: an artist’s rendering of the capacity manager in question.

    Directly solicit requirements from the business

    3.2a 30 minutes per stakeholder

    Once you’ve established, firmly, that everyone’s on the same team, meet individually with the stakeholders to assess capacity.

    Instructions

    1. Schedule a one-on-one meeting with each line of business manager (stakeholders identified in 3.1). Ideally this will be recurring.
    • Experienced capacity managers suggest doing this monthly.
  • In the meeting address the following questions:
    • What are some upcoming major initiatives?
    • Is the department going to expand or contract in a noticeable way?
    • Have customers taken to a particular product more than others?
  • Include the schedule in the Capacity Plan Template, and consider including details of the discussion in the notes section in tab 3 of the Capacity Snapshot Tool.
  • Input

    • Stakeholder opinions

    Output

    • Business requirements

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers

    Participants

    • Capacity manager
    • Infrastructure staff

    Info-Tech Insight

    Sometimes line of business managers will evade or ignore you when you come knocking. They do this because they don’t know and they don’t want to give you the wrong information. Explain that a best guess is all you can ask for and allay their fears.

    Below, you will find more details about what to look for when soliciting information from the line of business manager you’ve roped into your scheme.

    1. Consider the following:
    • Projected sales pipeline
    • Business growth
    • Seasonal cycles
    • Marketing campaigns
    • New applications and features
    • New products and services
  • Encourage business stakeholders to give you their best guess for elements such as projected sales or business growth.
  • Estimate variance and provide a range. What can you expect at the low end? The high end? Record your historical projections for an idea of how accurate you are.
  • Consider carefully the infrastructure impact of new features (and record this in the notes section of the Capacity Snapshot Tool).
  • Directly solicit requirements from the business (optional)

    3.2a 1 hour

    IT staff and line of business staff come with different skillsets. This can lead to confusion, but it doesn’t have to. Develop effective information solicitation techniques.

    Instructions

    1. Gather your IT staff in a room with a whiteboard. As a group, select a gold service/line of business manager you would like to use as a “practice dummy.”
    2. Have everyone write down a question they would ask of the line of business representative in a hypothetical business/service capacity discussion.
    3. As a group discuss the merits of the questions posed:
    • Are they likely to yield productive information?
    • Are they too vague or specific?
    • Is the person in question likely to know the answer?
    • Is the information requested a guarded trade secret?
  • Discuss the findings and include any notes in section 3 of the Capacity Plan Template.
  • Input

    • Workshop participants’ ideas

    Output

    • Interview skills

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers
    • Sticky notes

    Participants

    • Capacity manager
    • Infrastructure staff

    Map business needs to technical requirements, and technical requirements to infrastructure requirements

    3.2b 5 hours

    When it comes to mapping technical requirements, IT alone has the ability to effectively translate business needs.

    Instructions

    1. Use your notes from stakeholder meetings to assess the impact of any changes on gold systems.
    2. For each system brainstorm with infrastructure staff (and any technical experts as necessary) about what the information gleaned from stakeholder discussions. Consider the following discussion points:
    • How has demand for the service been trending? Does it match what the business is telling us?
    • Have we had availability issues in the past?
    • Has the business been right with their estimates in the past?
  • Estimate what a change in business/service metrics means for capacity.
    • E.g. how much RAM does a new email user require?
  • Record the output in the summary card of the Capacity Plan Template.
  • Input

    • Business needs

    Output

    • Technical and infrastructure requirements

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers

    Participants

    • Capacity manager
    • Infrastructure staff

    Info-Tech Insight

    Adapt the analysis to the needs of your organization. One capacity manager called the one-to-one mapping of business process to infrastructure demand the Holy Grail of capacity management. If this level of precision isn’t attainable, develop your own working estimates using the higher-level data

    Avoid putting too much faith in the cloud as a solution to your problem

    Has the rise of on-demand, functionally unlimited services eliminated the need for capacity and availability management?

    Capacity management

    The role of the capacity manager is changing, but it still has a purpose. Consider this:

    • Not everything can move to the cloud. For security/functionality reasons, on-premises infrastructure will continue to exist.
    • Cost management is more relevant than ever in the cloud age. Manage your instances.
    • While a cloud migration might render some component capacity management functions irrelevant, it could increase the relevance of others (the network, perhaps).

    Availability management

    Ensuring services are available is still IT’s wheelhouse, even if that means a shift to a brokerage model:

    • Business availability requirements (as part of the business impact analysis, potentially) are important; internal SLAs and contracts with vendors need to be managed.
    • Even in the cloud environment, availability is not guaranteed. Cloud providers have outages (unplanned, maintenance related, etc.) and someone will have to understand the limitations of cloud services and the impact on availability.

    Info-Tech Insight

    The cloud comes at the cost of detailed performance data. Sourcing a service through an SLA with a third party increases the need to perform your own performance testing of gold level applications. See performance monitoring.

    Beware Parkinson’s law

    A consequence of our infinite capacity for creativity, people have the enviable skill of making work. In 1955, C. Northcote Parkinson pointed out this fact in The Economist . What are the implications for capacity management?

    "It is a commonplace observation that work expands so as to fill the time available for its completion. Thus, an elderly lady of leisure can spend the entire day in writing and despatching a postcard to her niece at Bognor Regis. An hour will be spent in finding the postcard, another in hunting for spectacles, half-an-hour in a search for the address, an hour and a quarter in composition, and twenty minutes in deciding whether or not to take an umbrella when going to the pillar-box in the next street."

    C. Northcote Parkinson, The Economist, 1955

    Info-Tech Insight

    If you give people lots of capacity, they will use it. Most shops are overprovisioned, and in some cases that’s throwing perfectly good money away. Don’t be afraid to prod if someone requests something that doesn’t seem right.

    Optimally align demand and capacity

    When it comes to managing your capacity, look for any additional efficiencies.

    Questions to ask:

    • Are there any infrastructure services that are not being used to their full potential, sitting idle, or allocated to non-critical or zombie functions?
      • Are you managing your virtual servers? If, for example, you experience a seasonal spike in demand, are you leaving virtual machines running after the fact?
    • Do your organization’s policies and your infrastructure setup allow for the use of development resources for production during periods of peak demand?
    • Can you make organizational or process changes in order to satisfy demand more efficiently?

    In brief

    Who isn’t a sports fan? Big games mean big stakes for pool participants and armchair quarterbacks—along with pressure on the network as fans stream games from their work computers. One organization suffered from this problem, and, instead of taking a hardline and banning all streams, opted to stream the game on a large screen in a conference room where those interested could work for its duration. This alleviated strain on the network and kept staff happy.

    Shutting off an idle cloud to cut costs

    CASE STUDY

    Industry:Professional Services

    Source:Interview

    24/7 AWS = round-the-clock costs

    A senior developer realized that his development team had been leaving AWS instances running without any specific reason.

    Why?

    The development team appreciated the convenience of an always-on instance and, because the people spinning them up did not handle costs, the problem wasn’t immediately apparent.

    Resolution

    In his spare time over the course of a month, the senior developer wrote a program to manage the servers, including shutting them down during times when they were not in use and providing remote-access start-up when required. His team alone saved $30,000 in costs over the next six months, and his team lead reported that it would have been more than worth paying the team to implement such a project on company time.

    Identify inefficiencies in order to remediate them

    3.2c 20 minutes per service

    Instructions

    1. Gather the infrastructure team together and discuss existing capacity and demand. Use the inputs from your data analysis and stakeholder meetings to set the stage for your discussion.
    2. Solicit ideas about potential inefficiencies from your participants:
    • Are VMs effectively allocated? If you need 7 VMs to address a spike, are those VMs being reallocated post-spike?
    • Are developers leaving instances running in the cloud?
    • Are particular services massively overprovisioned?
    • What are the biggest infrastructure line items? Are there obvious opportunities for cost reduction there?
  • Record any potential opportunities in the summary of the Capacity Plan Template.
  • Input

    • Gold systems
    • Data inputs

    Output

    • Inefficiencies

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers

    Participants

    • Capacity manager
    • Infrastructure staff

    Info-Tech Insight

    The most effective capacity management takes a holistic approach and looks at the big picture in order to find ways to eliminate unnecessary infrastructure usage, or to find alternate or more efficient sources of required capacity.

    Dodging the toll troll by rerouting traffic

    CASE STUDY

    Industry:Telecommunications

    Source: Interview

    High-cost lines

    The capacity manager at a telecommunications provider mapped out his firm’s network traffic and discovered they were using a number of VP circuits (inter building cross connects) that were very expensive on the scale of their network.

    Paying the toll troll

    These VP circuits were supplying needed network services to the telecom provider’s clients, so there was no way to reduce this demand.

    Resolution

    The capacity manager analyzed where the traffic was going and compared this to the cost of the lines they were using. After performing the analysis, he found he could re-route much of the traffic away from the VP circuits and save on costs while delivering the same level of service to their users.

    Compare the data across business, component, and service levels, and project your capacity needs

    3.2d 2 hour session/meeting

    Make informed decisions about capacity. Remember: retain all documentation. It might come in handy for the justification of purchases.

    Instructions

    1. Using either a dedicated tool or generic spreadsheet software like Excel or Sheets, evaluate capacity trends. Ask the following questions:
    • Are there times when application performance degraded, and the service level was disrupted?
    • Are there times when certain components or systems neared, reached, or exceeded available capacity?
    • Are there seasonal variations in demand?
    • Are there clear trends, such as ongoing growth of business activity or the usage of certain applications?
    • What are the ramifications of trends or patterns in relation to infrastructure capacity?
  • Use the insight gathered from stakeholders during the stakeholder meetings, project required capacity for the critical components of each gold service.
  • Record the results of this activity in the summary card of the Capacity Plan Template.
  • Compare current capacity to your projections

    3.2e Section 5 of the Capacity Plan Template

    Capacity management (and, by extension, availability management) is a combination of two balancing acts: cost against capacity and supply and demand.*

    Instructions

    1. Compare your projections with your reality. You already know whether or not you have enough capacity given your lead times. But do you have too much? Compare your sub-component capacity projections to your current state.
    2. Highlight any outliers. Is there a particular service that is massively overprovisioned?
    3. Evaluate the reasons for the overprovisioning.
    • Is the component critically important?
    • Did you get a great deal on hardware?
    • Is it an oversight?
  • Record the results in the notes section of the summary card of the Capacity Plan Template.
  • *Office of Government Commerce 2001, 119.

    In brief

    The fractured nature of the capacity management space means that every organization is going to have a slightly different tooling strategy. No vendor has dominated, and every solution requires some level of customization. One capacity manager (a cloud provider, no less!) relayed a tale about a capacity management Excel sheet programmed with 5,000+ lines of code. As much work as that is, a bespoke solution is probably unavoidable.

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop.

    The image contains a picture of an Info-Tech analyst.

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech’s historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    3.2

    The image contains a screenshot of activity 3.2.

    Map business needs to technical requirements and technical requirements to infrastructure requirements

    The analyst will guide workshop participants in using their organization’s data to map out the relationships between applications, technical requirements, and the underlying infrastructure usage.

    Phase 3 Guided Implementation

    Call 1-888-670-8889 or email GuidedImplementations@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Complete these steps on your own, or call us to complete a guided implementation. A guided implementation is a series of 2-3 advisory calls that help you execute each phase of a project. They are included in most advisory memberships.

    Guided Implementation 3: Solicit and incorporate business needs

    Proposed Time to Completion: 2 weeks

    Step 3.1: Solicit business needs and gather data

    Review your findings with an analyst

    Discuss the effectiveness of your strategies to involve business stakeholders in the planning process and your methods of data collection and analysis.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Analyze historical trends and track your services’ status
    • Build a list of key business stakeholders
    • Bake stakeholders into the planning process

    With these tools & templates:

    Capacity Plan Template

    Step 3.2: Analyze data and project future needs

    Review your findings with an analyst

    Discuss the effectiveness of your strategies to involve business stakeholders in the planning process and your methods of data collection and analysis.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Map business needs to technical requirements and technical requirements to infrastructure requirements
    • Compare the data across business, component, and service levels, and project your capacity needs
    • Compare current capacity to your projections

    With these tools & templates:

    Capacity Snapshot Tool

    Capacity Plan Template

    Phase 3 Results & Insights:

    • Develop new business processes that more closely align your role with business stakeholders. Building these relationships takes hard work, and won’t happen overnight.
    • Take a holistic approach to eliminate unnecessary infrastructure usage or source capacity more efficiently.

    PHASE 4

    Identify and Mitigate Risks

    Step 4.1: Identify and mitigate risks

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Identify potential risks.
    • Determine strategies to mitigate risks.
    • Complete your capacity management plan.

    This involves the following participants:

    • Capacity manager
    • Infrastructure team members
    • Business stakeholders

    Outcomes of this step

    • Strategies for reducing risks
    • Capacity management plan

    Understand what happens when capacity/availability management fails

    1. Services become unavailable. If availability and capacity management are not constantly practiced, an inevitable consequence is downtime or a reduction in the quality of that service. Critical sub-component failures can knock out important systems on their own.
    2. Money is wasted. In response to fears about availability, it’s entirely possible to massively overprovision or switch entirely to a pay-as-you-go model. This, unfortunately, brings with it a whole host of other problems, including overspending. Remember: infinite capacity means infinite potential cost.
    3. IT remains reactive and is unable to contribute more meaningfully to the organization. If IT is constantly putting out capacity/availability-related fires, there is no room for optimization and activities to increase organizational maturity. Effective availability and capacity management will allow IT to focus on other work.

    Mitigate availability and capacity risks

    Availability: how often a service is usable (that is to say up and not too degraded to be effective). Consequences of reduced availability can include financial losses, impacted customer goodwill, and reduced faith in IT more generally.

    Causes of availability issues:

    • Poor capacity management – a service becomes unavailable when there is insufficient supply to meet demand. This is the result of poor capacity management.
    • Scheduled maintenance – services go down for maintenance with some regularity. This needs to be baked into service-level negotiations with vendors.
    • Vendor outages – sometimes vendors experience unplanned outages. There is typically a contract provision that covers unplanned outages, but that doesn’t change the fact that your service will be interrupted.

    Capacity: a particular component’s/service’s/business’ wiggle room. In other words, its usage ceiling.

    Causes of capacity issues:

    • Poor demand management – allowing users to run amok without any regard for how capacity is sourced and paid for.
    • Massive changes in legitimate demand – more usage means more demand.
    • Poor capacity planning – predictable changes in demand that go unaddressed can lead to capacity issues.

    Add additional potential causes of availability and capacity risks as needed

    4.1a 30 minutes

    Availability and capacity issues can stem from a number of different causes. Include a list in your availability and capacity management plan.

    Instructions

    1. Gather the group together. Go around the room and have participants provide examples of incidents and problems that have been the result of availability and capacity issues.
    2. Pose questions to the group about the source of those availability and capacity issues.
    • What could have been done differently to avoid these issues?
    • Was the availability/capacity issue a result of a faulty internal/external SLA?
  • Record the results of the exercise in sections 4.1 and 4.2 of the Capacity Plan Template.
  • Input

    • Capacity Snapshot Tool results

    Output

    • Additional sources of availability and capacity risks

    Materials

    • Capacity Plan Template

    Participants

    • Capacity manager
    • Infrastructure staff

    Info-Tech Insight

    Availability and capacity problems result in incidents, critical incidents, and problems. These are addressed in a separate project (incident and problem management), but information about common causes can streamline that process.

    Identify capacity risks and mitigate them

    4.1b 30 minutes

    Based on your understanding of your capacity needs (through written SLAs and informal but regular meetings with the business) highlight major risks you foresee.

    Instructions

    1. Make a chart with two columns on a whiteboard. They should be labelled “risk” and “mitigation” respectively.
    2. Record risks to capacity you have identified in earlier activities.
    • Refer to the Capacity Snapshot Tool for components that are highlighted in red and yellow. These are specific components that present special challenges. Identify the risk(s) in as much detail as possible. Include service and business risks as well.
    • Examples: a marketing push will put pressure on the web server; a hiring push will require more Office 365 licenses; a downturn in registration will mean that fewer VMs will be required to run the service.

    Input

    • Capacity Snapshot Tool results

    Output

    • Inefficiencies

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers

    Participants

    • Capacity manager
    • Infrastructure staff

    Info-Tech Insight

    It’s an old adage, but it checks out: don’t come to the table armed only with problems. Be a problem solver and prove IT’s value to the organization.

    Identify capacity risks and mitigate them (cont.)

    4.1b 1.5 hours

    Instructions (cont.)

    1. Begin developing mitigation strategies. Options for responding to known capacity risks fall into one of two camps:
    • Acceptance: responding to the risk is costlier than acknowledging its existence without taking any action. For gold systems, acceptance is typically not acceptable.
    • Mitigation: limiting/reducing, eliminating, or transferring risk (Herrera) comprise the sort of mitigation discussed here.
      • Limiting/reducing: taking steps to improve the capacity situation, but accepting some level of risk (spinning up a new VM, pushing back on demands from the business, promoting efficiency).
      • Eliminating: the most comprehensive (and most expensive) mitigation strategy, elimination could involve purchasing a new server or, at the extreme end, building a new datacenter.
      • Transfer: “robbing Peter to pay Paul,” in the words of capacity manager Todd Evans, is one potential way to limit your exposure. Is there a less critical service that can be sacrificed to keep your gold service online?
  • Record the results of this exercise in section 5 of the Capacity Plan Template.
  • Input

    • Capacity Snapshot Tool results

    Output

    • Capacity risk mitigations

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers

    Participants

    • Capacity manager
    • Infrastructure staff

    Info-Tech Insight

    It’s an old adage, but it checks out: don’t come to the table armed only with problems. Be a problem solver and prove IT’s value to the organization.

    Identify availability risks and mitigate them

    4.1c 30 minutes

    While capacity management is a form of availability management, it is not the only form. In this activity, outline the specific nature of threats to availability.

    Instructions

    1. Make a chart with two columns on a whiteboard. They should be labelled “risk” and “mitigation” respectively.
    2. Begin brainstorming general availability risks based on the following sources of information/categories:
    • Vendor outages
    • Disaster recovery
    • Historical availability issues

    The image contains a large blue circle labelled: Availability. Also in the blue circle is a small red circle labelled: Capacity.

    Input

    • Capacity Snapshot Tool results

    Output

    • Availability risks and mitigations

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers

    Participants

    • Capacity manager
    • Infrastructure staff

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    A dynamic central repository is a good way to ensure that availability issues stemming from a variety of causes are captured and mitigated.

    Identify availability risks and mitigate them (cont.)

    4.1c 1.5 hours

    Although it is easier said than done, identifying potential mitigations is a crucial part of availability management as an activity.

    Instructions (cont.)

    1. Begin developing mitigation strategies. Options for responding to known capacity risks fall into one of two camps:
    • Acceptance – responding to the risk is costlier than taking it on. Some unavailability is inevitable, between maintenance and unscheduled downtime. Record this, though it may not require immediate action.
    • Mitigation strategies:
      • Limiting/reducing – taking steps to increase availability of critical systems. This could include hot spares for unreliable systems or engaging a new vendor.
      • Eliminating – the most comprehensive (and most expensive) mitigation strategy. It could include selling.
      • Transfer – “robbing Peter to pay Paul,” in the words of capacity manager Todd Evans, is one potential way to limit your exposure. Is there a less critical service that can be sacrificed to keep your gold service online?
  • Record the results of this exercise in section 5 of Capacity Plan Template.
  • Input

    • Capacity Snapshot Tool results

    Output

    • Availability risks and mitigations

    Materials

    • Whiteboard
    • Markers

    Participants

    • Capacity manager
    • Infrastructure staff

    Iterate on the process and present your completed availability and capacity management plan

    The stakeholders consulted as part of the process will be interested in its results. Share them, either in person or through a collaboration tool.

    The current status of your availability and capacity management plan should be on the agenda for every stakeholder meeting. Direct the stakeholders’ attention to the parts of the document that are relevant to them, and solicit their thoughts on the document’s accuracy. Over time you should get a pretty good idea of who among your stakeholder group is skilled at projecting demand, and who over- or underestimates, and by how much. This information will improve your projections and, therefore, your management over time.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Use the experience gained and the artifacts generated to build trust with the business. The meetings should be regular, and demonstrating that you’re actually using the information for good is likely to make hesitant participants in the process more likely to open up.

    If you want additional support, have our analysts guide you through this phase as part of an Info-Tech workshop.

    The image contains a picture of an Info-Tech analyst.

    Book a workshop with our Info-Tech analysts:

    • To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.
    • Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team onsite at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech’s historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.
    • Contact your account manager (www.infotech.com/account), or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    4.1

    The image contains a screenshot of activity 4.1.

    Identify capacity risks and mitigate them

    The analyst will guide workshop participants in identifying potential risks to capacity and determining strategies for mitigating them.

    Phase 4 Guided Implementation

    Call 1-888-670-8889 or email GuidedImplementations@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Complete these steps on your own, or call us to complete a guided implementation. A guided implementation is a series of 2-3 advisory calls that help you execute each phase of a project. They are included in most advisory memberships.

    Guided Implementation 4: Identify and mitigate risks

    Proposed Time to Completion: 1 week

    Step 4.1: Identify and mitigate risks

    Review your findings with an analyst

    • Discuss your potential risks and your strategies for mitigating those risks.

    Then complete these activities…

    • Identify capacity risks and mitigate them
    • Identify availability risks and mitigate them
    • Complete your capacity management plan

    With these tools & templates:

    Capacity Snapshot Tool

    Capacity Plan Template

    Phase 4 Results & Insights:

    • Be a problem solver and prove IT’s value to the organization. Capacity management allows infrastructure to drive business value.
    • Iterate and share results. Reinforce your relationships with stakeholders and continue to refine how capacity management transforms your organization’s business processes.

    Insight breakdown

    Insight 1

    Components are critical to availability and capacity management.

    The CEO doesn’t care about the SMTP server. She cares about meeting customer needs and producing profit. For IT capacity and availability managers, though, the devil is in the details. It only takes one faulty component to knock out a service. Keep track and keep the lights on.

    Insight 2

    Ask what the business is working on, not what they need.

    If you ask them what they need, they’ll tell you – and it won’t be cheap. Find out what they’re going to do, and use your expertise to service those needs. Use your IT experience to estimate the impact of business and service level changes on the components that secure the availability you need.

    Insight 3

    Cloud shmoud.

    The role of the capacity manager might be changing with the advent of the public cloud, but it has not disappeared. Capacity managers in the age of the cloud are responsible for managing vendor relationships, negotiating external SLAs, projecting costs and securing budgets, reining in prodigal divisions, and so on.

    Summary of accomplishment

    Knowledge Gained

    • Impact of downtime on the organization
    • Gold systems
    • Key dependencies and sub-components
    • Strategy for monitoring components
    • Strategy for soliciting business needs
    • Projected capacity needs
    • Availability and capacity risks and mitigations

    Processes Optimized

    • Availability management
    • Capacity management

    Deliverables Completed

    • Business Impact Analysis
    • Capacity Plan Template

    Project step summary

    Client Project: Develop an Availability and Capacity Management Plan

    1. Conduct a business impact analysis
    2. Assign criticality ratings to services
    3. Define your monitoring strategy
    4. Implement your monitoring tool/aggregator
    5. Solicit business needs and gather data
    6. Analyze data and project future needs
    7. Identify and mitigate risks

    Info-Tech Insight

    This project has the ability to fit the following formats:

    • Onsite workshop by Info-Tech Research Group consulting analysts.
    • Do-it-yourself with your team.
    • Remote delivery via Info-Tech Guided Implementation.

    Research contributors and experts

    The image contains a picture of Adrian Blant.

    Adrian Blant, Independent Capacity Consultant, IT Capability Solutions

    Adrian has over 15 years' experience in IT infrastructure. He has built capacity management business processes from the ground up, and focused on ensuring a productive dialogue between IT and the business.

    The image contains a picture of James Zhang.

    James Zhang, Senior Manager Disaster Recovery, AIG Technology

    James has over 20 years' experience in IT and 10 years' experience in capacity management. Throughout his career, he has focused on creating new business processes to deliver value and increase efficiency over the long term.

    The image contains a picture of Mayank Banerjee.

    Mayank Banerjee, CTO, Global Supply Chain Management, HelloFresh

    Mayank has over 15 years' experience across a wide range of technologies and industries. He has implemented highly automated capacity management processes as part of his role of owning and solving end-to-end business problems.

    The image contains a picture of Mike Lynch

    Mike Lynch, Consultant, CapacityIQ

    Mike has over 20 years' experience in IT infrastructure. He takes a holistic approach to capacity management to identify and solve key problems, and has developed automated processes for mapping performance data to information that can inform business decisions.

    The image contains a picture of Paul Waguespack.

    Paul Waguespack, Manager of Application Systems Engineering, Tufts Health Plan

    Paul has over 10 years' experience in IT. He has specialized in implementing new applications and functionalities throughout their entire lifecycle, and integrating with all aspects of IT operations.

    The image contains a picture of Richie Mendoza.

    Richie Mendoza, IT Consultant, SMITS Inc.

    Richie has over 10 years' experience in IT infrastructure. He has specialized in using demand forecasting to guide infrastructure capacity purchasing decisions, to provide availability while avoiding costly overprovisioning.

    The image contains a picture of Rob Thompson.

    Rob Thompson, President, IT Tools & Process

    Rob has over 30 years’ IT experience. Throughout his career he has focused on making IT a generator of business value. He now runs a boutique consulting firm.

    Todd Evans, Capacity and Performance Management SME, IBM

    Todd has over 20 years' experience in capacity and performance management. At Kaiser Permanente, he established a well-defined mapping of the businesses workflow processes to technical requirements for applications and infrastructure.

    Bibliography

    451 Research. “Best of both worlds: Can enterprises achieve both scalability and control when it comes to cloud?” 451 Research, November 2016. Web.

    Allen, Katie. “Work Also Shrinks to Fit the Time Available: And We Can Prove It.” The Guardian. 25 Oct. 2017.

    Amazon. “Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud.” Amazon Web Services. N.d. Web.

    Armandpour, Tim. “Lies Vendors Tell about Service Level Agreements and How to Negotiate for Something Better.” Network World. 12 Jan 2016.

    “Availability Management.” ITIL and ITSM World. 2001. Web.

    Availability Management Plan Template. Purple Griffon. 30 Nov. 2012. Web.

    Bairi, Jayachandra, B., Murali Manohar, and Goutam Kumar Kundu. “Capacity and Availability Management by Quantitative Project Management in the IT Service Industry.” Asian Journal on Quality 13.2 (2012): 163-76. Web.

    BMC Capacity Optimization. BMC. 24 Oct 2017. Web.

    Brooks, Peter, and Christa Landsberg. Capacity Management in Today’s IT Environment. MentPro. 16 Aug 2017. Web.

    "Capacity and Availability Management." CMMI Institute. April 2017. Web.

    Capacity and Availability Management. IT Quality Group Switzerland. 24 Oct. 2017. Web.

    Capacity and Performance Management: Best Practices White Paper. Cisco. 4 Oct. 2005. Web.

    "Capacity Management." Techopedia.

    “Capacity Management Forecasting Best Practices and Recommendations.” STG. 26 Jan 2015. Web.

    Capacity Management from the Ground up. Metron. 24 Oct. 2017. Web.

    Capacity Management in the Modern Datacenter. Turbonomic. 25 Oct. 2017. Web.

    Capacity Management Maturity Assessing and Improving the Effectiveness. Metron. 24 Oct. 2017. Web.

    “Capacity Management Software.” TeamQuest. 24 Oct 2017. Web,

    Capacity Plan Template. Purainfo. 11 Oct 2012. Web.

    “Capacity Planner—Job Description.” Automotive Industrial Partnership. 24 Oct. 2017. Web.

    Capacity Planning. CDC. Web. Aug. 2017.

    "Capacity Planning." TechTarget. 24 Oct 2017. Web.

    “Capacity Planning and Management.” BMC. 24 Oct 2017. Web.

    "Checklist Capacity Plan." IT Process Wiki. 24 Oct. 2017. Web.

    Dykes, Brent. “Actionable Insights: The Missing Link Between Data and Business Value.” Forbes. April 26, 2016. Web.

    Evolved Capacity Management. CA Technologies. Oct. 2013. Web.

    Francis, Ryan. “False positives still cause threat alert fatigue.” CSO. May 3, 2017. Web.

    Frymire, Scott. "Capacity Planning vs. Capacity Analytics." ScienceLogic. 24 Oct. 2017. Web.

    Glossary. Exin. Aug. 2017. Web.

    Herrera, Michael. “Four Types of Risk Mitigation and BCM Governance, Risk and Compliance.” MHA Consulting. May 17, 2013.

    Hill, Jon. How to Do Capacity Planning. TeamQuest. 24 Oct. 2017. Web.

    “How to Create an SLA in 7 Easy Steps.” ITSM Perfection. 25 Oct. 2017. Web.

    Hunter, John. “Myth: If You Can’t Measure It: You Can’t Manage It.” W. Edwards Deming Institute Blog. 13 Aug 2015. Web.

    IT Service Criticality. U of Bristol. 24 Oct. 2017. Web.

    "ITIL Capacity Management." BMC's Complete Guide to ITIL. BMC Software. 22 Dec. 2016. Web.

    “Just-in-time.” The Economist. 6 Jul 2009. Web.

    Kalm, Denise P., and Marv Waschke. Capacity Management: A CA Service Management Process Map. CA. 24 Oct. 2017. Web.

    Klimek, Peter, Rudolf Hanel, and Stefan Thurner. “Parkinson’s Law Quantified: Three Investigations in Bureaucratic Inefficiency.” Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 3 (2009): 1-13. Aug. 2017. Web.

    Landgrave, Tim. "Plan for Effective Capacity and Availability Management in New Systems." TechRepublic. 10 Oct. 2002. Web.

    Longoria, Gina. “Hewlett Packard Enterprise Goes After Amazon Public Cloud in Enterprise Storage.” Forbes. 2 Dec. 2016. Web.

    Maheshwari, Umesh. “Understanding Storage Capacity.” NimbleStorage. 7 Jan. 2016. Web.

    Mappic, Sandy. “Just how complex can a Login Transaction be? Answer: Very!” Appdynamics. Dec. 11 2011. Web.

    Miller, Ron. “AWS Fires Back at Larry Ellison’s Claims, Saying It’s Just Larry Being Larry.” Tech Crunch. 2 Oct. 2017. Web.

    National College for Teaching & Leadership. “The role of data in measuring school performance.” National College for Teaching & Leadership. N.d. Web,

    Newland, Chris, et al. Enterprise Capacity Management. CETI, Ohio State U. 24 Oct. 2017. Web.

    Office of Government Commerce . Best Practice for Service Delivery. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 2001.

    Office of Government Commerce. Best Practice for Business Perspective: The IS View on Delivering Services to the Business. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 2004.

    Parkinson, C. Northcote. “Parkinson’s Law.” The Economist. 19 Nov. 1955. Web.

    “Parkinson’s Law Is Proven Again.” Financial Times. 25 Oct. 2017. Web.

    Paul, John, and Chris Hayes. Performance Monitoring and Capacity Planning. VM Ware. 2006. Web.

    “Reliability and Validity.” UC Davis. N.d. Web.

    "Role: Capacity Manager." IBM. 2008. Web.

    Ryan, Liz. “‘If You Can’t Measure It, You Can’t Manage It’: Not True.” Forbes. 10 Feb. 2014. Web.

    S, Lalit. “Using Flexible Capacity to Lower and Manage On-Premises TCO.” HPE. 23 Nov. 2016. Web.

    Snedeker, Ben. “The Pros and Cons of Public and Private Clouds for Small Business.” Infusionsoft. September 6, 2017. Web.

    Statement of Work: IBM Enterprise Availability Management Service. IBM. Jan 2016. Web.

    “The Road to Perfect AWS Reserved Instance Planning & Management in a Nutshell.” Botmetric. 25 Oct. 2017. Web.

    Transforming the Information Infrastructure: Build, Manage, Optimize. Asigra. Aug. 2017. Web.

    Valentic, Branimir. "Three Faces of Capacity Management." ITIL/ISO 20000 Knowledge Base. Advisera. 24 Oct. 2017. Web.

    "Unify IT Performance Monitoring and Optimization." IDERA. 24 Oct. 2017. Web.

    "What is IT Capacity Management?" Villanova U. Aug. 2017. Web.

    Wolstenholme, Andrew. Final internal Audit Report: IT Availability and Capacity (IA 13 519/F). Transport For London. 23 Feb. 2015. Web.

    Understand the Difference Between Backups and Archives

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}506|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Storage & Backup Optimization
    • Parent Category Link: /storage-and-backup-optimization
    • You don’t understand the difference between a backup and an archive or when to use one or the other.
    • Data is not constant. It is ever-changing and growing. How do you protect it?
    • You just replaced an application that was in use since day one, and even though you have a fully functional replacement, you would like to archive that original application just in case.
    • You want to save money, so you use your backup solution to archive data, but you know that is not ideal. What is the correct solution?

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    Keep in mind that backups are for recovery while archives are for discovery. Backups and archives are often confused but understanding the differences can result in significant savings of time and money. Backing up and archiving may be considered IT tasks, but recovery and discovery are capabilities the business wants and is willing to pay for.

    Impact and Result

    Archives and backups are not the same, and there is a use case for each. Sometimes minor adjustments may be required to make the use case work. Understanding the basics of backups and archives can lead to significant savings at a monetary and effort level.

    Understand the Difference Between Backups and Archives Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Understand the Difference Between Backups and Archives

    What is the difference between a backup and a data archive? When should I use one over the other? They are not the same and confusing the two concepts could be expensive.

    • Understand the Difference Between Backups and Archives Storyboard
    [infographic]

    Further reading

    Understand the Difference Between Backups and Archives

    They are not the same, and confusing the two concepts could be expensive

    Analyst Perspective

    Backups and archives are not interchangeable, but they can complement each other.

    Photo of P.J. Ryan, Research Director, Infrastructure & Operations, Info-Tech Research Group.

    Backups and archives are two very different operations that are quite often confused or misplaced. IT and business leaders are tasked with protecting corporate data from a variety of threats. They also must conform to industry, geographical, and legal compliance regulations. Backup solutions keep the data safe from destruction. If you have a backup, why do you also need an archive? Archive solutions hold data for a long period of time and can be searched. If you have an archive, why do you also need a backup solution? Backups and archives used to be the same. Remember when you would keep the DAT tape in the same room as the argon gas fire suppression system for seven years? Now that's just not feasible. Some situations require a creative approach or a combination of backups and archives.

    Understand the difference between archives and backups and you will understand why the two solutions are necessary and beneficial to the business.

    P.J. Ryan
    Research Director, Infrastructure & Operations
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge
    • You don’t understand the difference between a backup and an archive or when to use one over the other.
    • Data is not constant. It is ever-changing and growing. How do you protect it?
    • You just replaced an application that had been in use since day one, and even though you have a fully functional replacement, you would like to archive that original application just in case.
    • You want to save money, so you use your backup solution to archive data, but you know that is not ideal. What is the correct solution?
    Common Obstacles
    • Storage costs can be expensive, as can some backup and archiving solutions.
    • Unclear requirements definition to decide between backups or archives.
    • Historically, people referred to archiving as tossing something into a box and storing it away indefinitely. Data archiving has a different meaning.
    • Executives want retired applications preserved but do not provide reasons or requirements.
    Info-Tech’s Approach
    • Spend wisely. Why spend money on an archive solution when a backup will suffice? Don’t leave money on the table.
    • Be creative and assess each backup or archive situation carefully. A custom solution may be required.
    • Backup your production data for the purpose of restoring it and adhere to the 3-2-1 rule of backups (Naviko.com).
    • Archive your older data to an alternate storge platform to save space, allow for searchability, and provide retention parameters.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Keep in mind that backups are for recovery while archives are for discovery. Backups and archives are often confused but understanding the differences can result in significant savings of time and money. Backing up and archiving may be considered IT tasks but recovery and discovery are capabilities the business wants and is willing to pay for.

    Archive

    What it IS

    A data archive is an alternate location for your older, infrequently accessed production data. It is indexed and searchable based on keywords. Archives are deleted after a specified period based on your retention policy or compliance directives.

    What it IS NOT

    Archives are not an emergency copy of your production data. They are not any type of copy of your production data. Archives will not help you if you lose your data or accidentally delete a file. Archives are not multiple copies of production data from various recovery points.

    Why use it

    Archives move older data to an alternate location. This frees up storage space for your current data. Archives are indexed and can be searched for historical purposes, compliance reasons, or in the event of a legal matter where specific data must be provided to a legal team.

    Tips & Tricks – Archiving

    • Archiving will move older data to an alternate location. This will free up storage space in the production environment.
    • Archiving solutions index the data to allow for easier searchability. This will aid in common business searches as well as assist with any potential legal searches.
    • Archiving allows companies to hold onto data for historical purposes as well as for specific retention periods in compliance with industry and regional regulations such as SOX, GDPR, FISMA, as well as others (msp360.com).

    Backup

    What it IS

    A backup is a copy of your data from a specific day and time. It is primarily used for recovery or restoration if something happens to the production copy of data. The restore will return the file or folder to the state it was in at the time of the backup.

    Backups occur frequently to ensure the most recent version of data is copied to a safe location.

    A typical backup plan makes a copy of the data every day, once a week, and once a month. The data is stored on tapes, disk, or using cloud storage.

    What it IS NOT

    Backups are not designed for searching or discovery. If you backup your email and must go to that backup in search of all email pertaining to a specific topic, you must restore the full backup and then search for that specific topic or sender. If you kept all the monthly backups for seven years, that will mean repeating that process 84 times to have a conclusive search, assuming you have adequate storage space to restore the email database 84 times.

    Backups do not free up space.

    Why use it

    Backups protect your data in the event of disaster, deletion, or accidental damage. A good backup strategy will include multiple backups on different media and offsite storage of at least one copy.

    Tips & Tricks – Backups

    • Production data should be backed up on a regular basis, ideally once a day or more frequently if possible.
    • Backups are intended to restore data when it gets deleted, over-written, or otherwise compromised. Most restore requests are from the last 24 to 48 hours, so it may be advantageous to keep a backup readily available on disk for a quick restore when needed.
    • Some vendors and industry subject matter experts advocate the use of a 3-2-1 rule when it comes to backups:
      • Keep three copies of your production data
      • In at least two separate locations (some advocate two different formats), and
      • One copy should be offsite (nakivo.com)

    Cold Storage

    • Cold storage refers to a storage option offered by some cloud vendors. In the context of the discussion between backups and archives, it can be an option for a dedicated backup solution for a specific period. Cost is low and the data is protected from destruction.
    • If an app has been replaced and all data transferred to the replacement solution but for some reason the company wishes to hold onto the data, you want a backup, not an archive. Extract the data, convert it into MongoDB or a similar solution, and drop it into cheap cloud storage (cold storage) for less than $5 per TB/month.

    Case Study

    Understanding the difference between archives and backups could save you a lot of time and money

    INDUSTRY: Manufacturing | SOURCE: Info-Tech Research

    Understanding the difference between an archive and a backup was the first step in solving their challenge.

    A leading manufacturing company found themselves in a position where they had to decide between archiving or doing nothing.

    The company had completed several acquisitions and ended up with multiple legacy applications that had been merged or migrated into replacement solutions. These legacy applications were very important to the original companies and although the data they held had been migrated to a replacement solution, executives felt they should hold onto these applications for a period of time, just in case.

    Some of the larger applications were archived using a modern archiving solution, but when it came to the smaller applications, the cost to add them to the archiving solution greatly exceeded the cost to just keep them running and maintain the associated infrastructure.

    A research advisor from Info-Tech Research Group joined a call with the manufacturing company and discussed their situation. The difference between archives and backups was explained and through the course of the conversation it was discovered that the solution was a modified backup. The application data had already been preserved through the migration, so data could be accessed in the production environment. The requirement to keep the legacy application up and running was not necessary but in compliance with the request to keep the information, the data could be exported from the legacy application into a non-sequential database, compressed, and stored in cloud-based cold storage for less than five dollars per terabyte per month. The manufacturing company’s staff realized that they could apply this same approach to several of their legacy applications and save tens of thousands of dollars in the process.

    Understand the Difference Between Backups and Archives

    Backups

    Backups are for recovery. A backup is a snapshot copy of production data at a specific point in time. If the production data is lost, destroyed, or somehow compromised, the data can be restored from the backup.

    Archives

    Archives are for discovery. It is production data that is moved to an alternate location to free up storage space, allow the data to be searchable, and still hold onto the data for historical or compliance purposes.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Archives and backups are not the same, and there is a use case for each. Sometimes minor adjustments may be required to make the use case work. Understanding the basics of backups and archives can lead to significant savings at a monetary and effort level.

    Additional Guidance

    Production data should be backed up.

    The specific backup solution is up to the business.

    Production data that is not frequently accessed should be archived.

    The specific solution to perform and manage the archiving of the data is up to the business

    • Archived data should also be backed up at least once.
    If the app has been replaced and all data transferred, you want a backup not an archive if you want to keep the data.
    • Short term – fence it off.
    • Long term – extract into Mongo then drop it into cheap cloud storage.

    Case Study

    Using tape backups as an archive solution could result in an expensive discovery and retrieval exercise.

    INDUSTRY: Healthcare | SOURCE: Zasio Enterprises Inc.

    “Do not commingle archive data with backup or disaster recovery tapes.”

    A court case in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada involving Guardiola and Renown Health in 2015 is a good example of why using a backup solution to solve an archiving challenge is a bad idea.

    Renown Health used a retention policy that declared any email older than six months of age as inactive and moved that email to a backup tape. Renown Health was ordered by the court to produce emails from a period of time in the past. Renown estimated that it would cost at least $248,000 to produce those emails, based on the effort involved to restore data from each tape and search for the email in question. Renown Health argued that this long and expensive process would result in undue costs.

    The court reviewed the situation and ruled against Renown Health and ordered them to comply with the request (Zasio.com).

    A proper archiving solution would have provided a quick and low-cost method to retrieve the emails in question.

    Backups and archives are complementary to each other

    • Archives are still production data, but the data does not change. A backup is recommended for the archived data, but the frequency of the backups can be lowered.
    • Backups protect you if a disaster strikes by providing a copy of the production data that was compromised or damaged. Archives allow you to access older data that may have just been forgotten, not destroyed or compromised. Archives could also protect you in a legal court case by providing data that is older but may prove your argument in court.

    Archives and backups are not the same.

    Backups copy your data. Archives move your data. Backups facilitate recovery. Archives facilitate discovery.

    Archive Backup
    Definition Move rarely accessed (but still production) data to separate media. Store a copy of frequently used data on a separate media to ensure timely operational recovery.
    Use Case Legal discovery, primary storage reduction, compliance requirements, and audits. Accidental deletion and/or corruption of data, hardware/software failures.
    Method Disk, cloud storage, appliance. Disk, backup appliance, snapshots, cloud.
    Data Older, rarely accessed production data. Current production data.

    Is it a backup or archive?

    • You want to preserve older data for legal and compliance reasons, so you put extra effort into keeping your tape backups safe and secure for seven years. That’s a big mistake that may cost you time and money. You want an archive solution.
    • You replace your older application and migrate all data to the new system, but you want to hold onto the old data, just in case. That’s a backup, not an archive.
    • A long serving senior executive recently left the company. You want to preserve the contents of the executive's laptop in case it is needed in the future. That’s a backup.

    Considerations When Choosing Between Solutions

    1

    Backup or archive?

    2

    What are you protecting?

    3

    Why are you protecting data?

    4

    Solution

    Backup

    Backup and/or archive.
    Additional information required.
    Column 3 may help

    Archive

    Device

    Data

    Application

    Operational Environment

    Operational recovery

    Disaster recovery

    Just in case

    Production storage space reduction

    Retention and preservation

    Governance, risk & compliance

    Backup

    Archive

    Related Info-Tech Research

    Stock image of light grids and flares. Establish an Effective Data Protection Plan

    Give data the attention it deserves by building a strategy that goes beyond backup.

    Stock image of old fuse box switches. Modernize Enterprise Storage

    Current and emerging storage technologies are disrupting the status quo – prepare your infrastructure for the exponential rise in data and its storage requirements.

    Logo for 'Software Reviews' and their information on 'Compare and Evaluate: Data Archiving.'
    Sample of Info-Tech's 'Data Archiving Policy'. Data Archiving Policy

    Bibliography

    “Backup vs. archiving: Know the difference.” Open-E. Accessed 05 Mar 2022.Web.

    G, Denis. “How to build retention policy.” MSP360, Jan 3, 2020. Accessed 10 Mar 2022.

    Ipsen, Adam. “Archive vs Backup: What’s the Difference? A Definition Guide.” BackupAssist, 28 Mar 2017. Accessed 04 Mar 2022.

    Kang, Soo. “Mitigating the expense of E-discovery; Recognizing the difference between back-ups and archived data.” Zasio Enterprises, 08 Oct 2015. Accessed 3 Mar 2022.

    Mayer, Alex. “The 3-2-1 Backup Rule – An Efficient Data Protection Strategy.” Naviko. Accessed 12 Mar 2022.

    “What is Data-Archiving?” Proofpoint. Accessed 07 Mar 2022.

    Build a Data Warehouse

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}200|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 8.7/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $94,499 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 30 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Big Data
    • Parent Category Link: /big-data
    • Relational data warehouses, although reliable, centralized repositories for corporate data, were not built to handle the speed and volume of data and analytics today.
    • IT is under immense pressure from business units to provide technology that will yield greater agility and insight.
    • While some organizations are benefitting from modernization technologies, the majority of IT departments are unfamiliar with the technologies and have not yet defined clear use cases.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • The vast majority of your corporate data is not being properly leveraged. Modernize the data warehouse to get value from the 80% of unstructured data that goes unused.
    • Avoid rip and replace. Develop a future state that complements your existing data warehouse with emerging technologies.
    • Be flexible in your roadmap. Create an implementation roadmap that’s incremental and adapts to changing business priorities.

    Impact and Result

    • Establish both the business and IT perspectives of today’s data warehouse environment.
    • Explore the art-of-the-possible. Don’t get stuck trying to gather technical requirements from business users who don’t know what they don’t know. Use Info-Tech’s interview guide to discuss the pains of the current environment, and more importantly, where stakeholders want to be in the future.
    • Build an internal knowledgebase with respect to emerging technologies. The technology landscape is constantly shifting and often difficult for IT staff to keep track of. Use Info-Tech’s Data Warehouse Modernization Technology Education Deck to ensure that IT is able to appropriately match the right tools to the business’ use cases.
    • Create a compelling business case to secure investment and support.

    Build a Data Warehouse Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should be looking to modernize the relational data warehouse, review Info-Tech’s framework for identifying modernization opportunities, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Assess the current data warehouse environment

    Review the business’ perception and architecture of the current data warehouse environment.

    • Drive Business Innovation With a Modernized Data Warehouse Environment – Phase 1: Assess the Current Data Warehouse Environment
    • Data Warehouse Maturity Assessment Tool

    2. Define modernization drivers

    Collaborate with business users to identify the strongest motivations for data warehouse modernization.

    • Drive Business Innovation With a Modernized Data Warehouse Environment – Phase 2: Define Modernization Drivers
    • Data Warehouse Modernization Stakeholder Interview Guide
    • Data Warehouse Modernization Technology Education Deck
    • Data Warehouse Modernization Initiative Building Tool

    3. Create the modernization future state

    Combine business ideas with modernization initiatives and create a roadmap.

    • Drive Business Innovation With a Modernized Data Warehouse Environment – Phase 3: Create the Modernization Future State
    • Data Warehouse Modernization Technology Architectural Template
    • Data Warehouse Modernization Deployment Plan
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Build a Data Warehouse

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Assess the Current Data Warehouse Environment

    The Purpose

    Discuss the general project overview for data warehouse modernization.

    Establish the business and IT perspectives of the current state.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Holistic understanding of the current data warehouse.

    Business user engagement from the start of the project.

    Activities

    1.1 Review data warehouse project history.

    1.2 Evaluate data warehouse maturity.

    1.3 Draw architecture diagrams.

    1.4 Review supporting data management practices.

    Outputs

    Data warehouse maturity assessment

    Data architecture diagrams

    2 Explore Business Opportunities

    The Purpose

    Conduct a user workshop session to elicit the most pressing needs of business stakeholders.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Modernization technology selection is directly informed by business drivers.

    In-depth IT understanding of the business pains and opportunities.

    Activities

    2.1 Review general trends and drivers in your industry.

    2.2 Identify primary business frustrations, opportunities, and risks.

    2.3 Identify business processes to target for modernization.

    2.4 Capture business ideas for the future state.

    Outputs

    Business ideas for modernization

    Defined strategic direction for data warehouse modernization

    3 Review the Technology Landscape

    The Purpose

    Educate IT staff on the most common technologies for data warehouse modernization.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Improved ability for IT to match technology with business ideas.

    Activities

    3.1 Appoint Modernization Advisors.

    3.2 Hold an open education and discussion forum for modernization technologies.

    Outputs

    Modernization Advisors identified

    Modernization technology education deck

    4 Define Modernization Solutions

    The Purpose

    Consolidate business ideas into modernization initiatives.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Refinement of the strategic direction for data warehouse modernization.

    Activities

    4.1 Match business ideas to technology solutions.

    4.2 Group similar ideas to create modernization initiatives.

    4.3 Create future-state architecture diagrams.

    Outputs

    Identified strategic direction for data warehouse modernization

    Defined modernization initiatives

    Future-state architecture for data warehouse

    5 Establish a Modernization Roadmap

    The Purpose

    Validate and build out initiatives with business users.

    Define benefits and costs to establish ROI.

    Identify enablers and barriers to modernization.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Completion of materials for a compelling business case and roadmap.

    Activities

    5.1 Validate use cases with business users.

    5.2 Define initiative benefits.

    5.3 Identify enablers and barriers to modernization.

    5.4 Define preliminary activities for initiatives.

    5.5 Evaluate initiative costs.

    5.6 Determine overall ROI.

    Outputs

    Validated modernization initiatives

    Data warehouse modernization roadmap

    Embed Security Into the DevOps Pipeline

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}265|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.3/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $31,515 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 26 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Secure Cloud & Network Architecture
    • Parent Category Link: /secure-cloud-network-architecture
    • Your organization is starting its DevOps journey and is looking to you for guidance on how to ensure that the outcomes are secure.
    • Or, your organization may have already embraced DevOps but left the security team behind. Now you need to play catch-up.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Shift security left. Identify opportunities to embed security earlier in the development pipeline.
    • Start with minimum viable security. Use agile methodologies to further your goals of secure DevOps.
    • Treat “No” as a finite resource. The role of security must transition from that of naysayer to a partner in finding the way to “Yes.”

    Impact and Result

    • Leverage the CLAIM (Culture, Learning, Automation, Integration, Measurement) Framework to identify opportunities to close the gaps.
    • Collaborate to find new ways to shift security left so that it becomes part of development rather than an afterthought.
    • Start with creating minimum viable security by developing a DevSecOps implementation strategy that focuses initially on quick wins.

    Embed Security Into the DevOps Pipeline Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should secure the DevOps pipeline, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Identify opportunities

    Brainstorm opportunities to secure the DevOps pipeline using the CLAIM Framework.

    • Embed Security Into the DevOps Pipeline – Phase 1: Identify Opportunities

    2. Develop strategy

    Assess opportunities and formulate a strategy based on a cost/benefit analysis.

    • Embed Security Into the DevOps Pipeline – Phase 2: Develop Strategy
    • DevSecOps Implementation Strategy Template
    [infographic]

    Optimize IT Change Management

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}409|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.5/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $33,585 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 27 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Operations Management
    • Parent Category Link: /i-and-o-process-management
    • Infrastructure managers and change managers need to re-evaluate their change management processes due to slow change turnaround time, too many unauthorized changes, too many incidents and outages because of poorly managed changes, or difficulty evaluating and prioritizing changes.
    • IT system owners often resist change management because they see it as slow and bureaucratic.
    • Infrastructure changes are often seen as different from application changes, and two (or more) processes may exist.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • ITIL provides a usable framework for change management, but full process rigor is not appropriate for every change request.
    • You need to design a process that is flexible enough to meet the demand for change, and strict enough to protect the live environment from change-related incidents.
    • A mature change management process will minimize review and approval activity. Counterintuitively, with experience in implementing changes, risk levels decline to a point where most changes are “pre-approved.”

    Impact and Result

    • Create a unified change management process that reduces risk. The process should be balanced in its approach toward deploying changes while also maintaining throughput of innovation and enhancements.
    • Categorize changes based on an industry-standard risk model with objective measures of impact and likelihood.
    • Establish and empower a change manager and change advisory board with the authority to manage, approve, and prioritize changes.
    • Integrate a configuration management database with the change management process to identify dependencies.

    Optimize IT Change Management Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should optimize change management, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    • Optimize IT Change Management – Phases 1-4

    1. Define change management

    Assess the maturity of your existing change management practice and define the scope of change management for your organization.

    • Change Management Maturity Assessment Tool
    • Change Management Risk Assessment Tool

    2. Establish roles and workflows

    Build your change management team and standardized process workflows for each change type.

    • Change Manager
    • Change Management Process Library – Visio
    • Change Management Process Library – PDF
    • Change Management Standard Operating Procedure

    3. Define the RFC and post-implementation activities

    Bookend your change management practice by standardizing change intake, implementation, and post-implementation activities.

    • Request for Change Form Template
    • Change Management Pre-Implementation Checklist
    • Change Management Post-Implementation Checklist

    4. Measure, manage, and maintain

    Form an implementation plan for the project, including a metrics evaluation, change calendar inputs, communications plan, and roadmap.

    • Change Management Metrics Tool
    • Change Management Communications Plan
    • Change Management Roadmap Tool
    • Optimize IT Change Management Improvement Initiative: Project Summary Template

    [infographic]

    Workshop: Optimize IT Change Management

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Define Change Management

    The Purpose

    Discuss the existing challenges and maturity of your change management practice.

    Build definitions of change categories and the scope of change management.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Understand the starting point and scope of change management.

    Understand the context of change request versus other requests such as service requests, projects, and operational tasks.

    Activities

    1.1 Outline strengths and challenges

    1.2 Conduct a maturity assessment

    1.3 Build a categorization scheme

    1.4 Build a risk assessment matrix

    Outputs

    Change Management Maturity Assessment Tool

    Change Management Risk Assessment Tool

    2 Establish Roles and Workflows

    The Purpose

    Define roles and responsibilities for the change management team.

    Develop a standardized change management practice for approved changes, including process workflows.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Built the team to support your new change management practice.

    Develop a formalized and right-sized change management practice for each change category. This will ensure all changes follow the correct process and core activities to confirm changes are completed successfully.

    Activities

    2.1 Define the change manager role

    2.2 Outline the membership and protocol for the Change Advisory Board (CAB)

    2.3 Build workflows for normal, emergency, and pre-approved changes

    Outputs

    Change Manager Job Description

    Change Management Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)

    Change Management Process Library

    3 Define the RFC and Post-Implementation Activities

    The Purpose

    Create a new change intake process, including a new request for change (RFC) form.

    Develop post-implementation review activities to be completed for every IT change.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Bookend your change management practice by standardizing change intake, implementation, and post-implementation activities.

    Activities

    3.1 Define the RFC template

    3.2 Determine post-implementation activities

    3.3 Build your change calendar protocol

    Outputs

    Request for Change Form Template

    Change Management Post-Implementation Checklist

    Project Summary Template

    4 Measure, Manage, and Maintain

    The Purpose

    Develop a plan and project roadmap for reaching your target for your change management program maturity.

    Develop a communications plan to ensure the successful adoption of the new program.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A plan and project roadmap for reaching target change management program maturity.

    A communications plan ready for implementation.

    Activities

    4.1 Identify metrics and reports

    4.2 Build a communications plan

    4.3 Build your implementation roadmap

    Outputs

    Change Management Metrics Tool

    Change Management Communications Plan

    Change Management Roadmap Tool

    Further reading

    Optimize IT Change Management

    Right-size IT change management practice to protect the live environment.

    EXECUTIVE BRIEF

    Analyst Perspective

    Balance risk and efficiency to optimize IT change management.

    Change management (change enablement, change control) is a balance of efficiency and risk. That is, pushing changes out in a timely manner while minimizing the risk of deployment. On the one hand, organizations can attempt to avoid all risk and drown the process in rubber stamps, red tape, and bureaucracy. On the other hand, organizations can ignore process and push out changes as quickly as possible, which will likely lead to change related incidents and debilitating outages.

    Right-sizing the process does not mean adopting every recommendation from best-practice frameworks. It means balancing the efficiency of change request fulfillment with minimizing risk to your organization. Furthermore, creating a process that encourages adherence is key to avoid change implementers from skirting your process altogether.

    Benedict Chang, Research Analyst, Infrastructure and Operations, Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    Infrastructure and application change occurs constantly and is driven by changing business needs, requests for new functionality, operational releases and patches, and resolution of incidents or problems detected by the service desk.

    IT managers need to follow a standard change management process to ensure that rogue changes are never deployed while the organization remains responsive to demand.

    Common Obstacles

    IT system owners often resist change management because they see it as slow and bureaucratic.

    At the same time, an increasingly interlinked technical environment may cause issues to appear in unexpected places. Configuration management systems are often not kept up-to-date and do not catch the potential linkages.

    Infrastructure changes are often seen as “different” from application changes and two (or more) processes may exist.

    Info-Tech’s Approach

    Info-Tech’s approach will help you:

    • Create a unified change management practice that balances risk and throughput of innovation.
    • Categorize changes based on an industry-standard risk model with objective measures of impact and likelihood.
    • Establish and empower a Change Manager and Change Advisory Board (CAB) with the authority to manage, approve, and prioritize changes.

    Balance Risk and Efficiency to Optimize IT Change Management

    Two goals of change management are to protect the live environment and deploying changes in a timely manner. These two may seem to sometimes be at odds against each other, but assessing risk at multiple points of a change’s lifecycle can help you achieve both.

    Your challenge

    This research is designed to help organizations who need to:

    • Build a right-sized change management practice that encourages adherence and balances efficiency and risk.
    • Integrate the change management practice with project management, service desk processes, configuration management, and other areas of IT and the business.
    • Communicate the benefits and impact of change management to all the stakeholders affected by the process.

    Change management is heavily reliant on organizational culture

    Having a right-sized process is not enough. You need to build and communicate the process to gather adherence. The process is useless if stakeholders are not aware of it or do not follow it.

    Increase the Effectiveness of Change Management in Your Organization

    The image is a bar graph, with the segments labelled 1 and 2. The y-axis lists numbers 1-10. Segment 1 is at 6.2, and segment 2 is at 8.6.

    Of the eight infrastructure & operations processes measured in Info-Tech’s IT Management and Governance Diagnostic (MGD) program, change management has the second largest gap between importance and effectiveness of these processes.

    Source: Info-Tech 2020; n=5,108 IT professionals from 620 organizations

    Common obstacles

    These barriers make this challenge difficult to address for many organizations:

    • Gaining buy-in can be a challenge no matter how well the process is built.
    • The complexity of the IT environment and culture of tacit knowledge for configuration makes it difficult to assess cross-dependencies of changes.
    • Each silo or department may have their own change management workflows that they follow internally. This can make it difficult to create a unified process that works well for everyone.

    “Why should I fill out an RFC when it only takes five minutes to push through my change?”

    “We’ve been doing this for years. Why do we need more bureaucracy?”

    “We don’t need change management if we’re Agile.”

    “We don’t have the right tools to even start change management.”

    “Why do I have to attend a CAB meeting when I don’t care what other departments are doing?”

    Info-Tech’s approach

    Build change management by implementing assessments and stage gates around appropriate levels of the change lifecycle.

    The image is a circle, comprised of arrows, with each arrow pointing to the next, forming a cycle. Each arrow is labelled, as follows: Improve; Request; Assess; Plan; Approve; Implement

    The Info-Tech difference:

    1. Create a unified change management process that balances risk and throughput of innovation.
    2. Categorize changes based on an industry-standard risk model with objective measures of impact and likelihood.
    3. Establish and empower a Change Manager and Change Advisory Board (CAB) with the authority to manage, approve, and prioritize changes.

    IT change is constant and is driven by:

    Change Management:

    1. Operations - Operational releases, maintenance, vendor-driven updates, and security updates can all be key drivers of change. Example: ITSM version update
      • Major Release
      • Maintenance Release
      • Security Patch
    2. Business - Business-driven changes may include requests from other business departments that require IT’s support. Examples: New ERP or HRIS implementation
      • New Application
      • New Version
    3. Service desk → Incident & Problem - Some incident and problem tickets require a change to facilitate resolution of the incident. Examples: Outage necessitating update of an app (emergency change), a user request for new functionality to be added to an existing app
      • Workaround
      • Fix
    4. Configuration Management Database (CMDB) ↔ Asset Management - In addition to software and hardware asset dependencies, a configuration management database (CMDB) is used to keep a record of changes and is queried to assess change requests.
      • Hardware
      • Software

    Insight summary

    “The scope of change management is defined by each organization…the purpose of change management is to maximize the number of successful service and product changes by ensuring that the risk have been properly assessed, authorizing changes to process, and managing the change schedule.” – ALEXOS Limited, ITIL 4

    Build a unified change management process balancing risk and change throughput.

    Building a unified process that oversees all changes to the technical environment doesn’t have to be burdensome to be effective. However, the process is a necessary starting point to identifying cross dependencies and avoiding change collisions and change-related incidents.

    Use an objective framework for estimating risk

    Simply asking, “What is the risk?” will result in subjective responses that will likely minimize the perceived risk. The level of due diligence should align to the criticality of the systems or departments potentially impacted by the proposed changes.

    Integrate your change process with your IT service management system

    Change management in isolation will provide some stability, but maturing the process through service integrations will enable data-driven decisions, decrease bureaucracy, and enable faster and more stable throughput.

    Change management and DevOps can work together effectively

    Change and DevOps tend to be at odds, but the framework does not have to change. Lower risk changes in DevOps are prime candidates for the pre-approved category. Much of the responsibility traditionally assigned to the CAB can be diffused throughout the software development lifecycle.

    Change management and DevOps can coexist

    Shift the responsibility and rigor to earlier in the process.

    • If you are implementing change management in a DevOps environment, ensure you have a strong DevOps lifecycle. You may wish to refer to Info-Tech’s research Implementing DevOps Practices That Work.
    • Consider starting in this blueprint by visiting Appendix II to frame your approach to change management. Follow the blueprint while paying attention to the DevOps Callouts.

    DEVOPS CALLOUTS

    Look for these DevOps callouts throughout this storyboard to guide you along the implementation.

    The image is a horizontal figure eight, with 7 arrows, each pointing into the next. They are labelled are follows: Plan; Create; Verify; Package; Release; Configure; Monitor. At the centre of the circles are the words Dev and Ops.

    Successful change management will provide benefits to both the business and IT

    Respond to business requests faster while reducing the number of change-related disruptions.

    IT Benefits

    • Fewer change-related incidents and outages
    • Faster change turnaround time
    • Higher rate of change success
    • Less change rework
    • Fewer service desk calls related to poorly communicated changes

    Business Benefits

    • Fewer service disruptions
    • Faster response to requests for new and enhanced functionalities
    • Higher rate of benefits realization when changes are implemented
    • Lower cost per change
    • Fewer “surprise” changes disrupting productivity

    IT satisfaction with change management will drive business satisfaction with IT. Once the process is working efficiently, staff will be more motivated to adhere to the process, reducing the number of unauthorized changes. As fewer changes bypass proper evaluation and testing, service disruptions will decrease and business satisfaction will increase.

    Change management improves core benefits to the business: the four Cs

    Most organizations have at least some form of change control in place, but formalizing change management leads to the four Cs of business benefits:

    Control

    Change management brings daily control over the IT environment, allowing you to review every relatively new change, eliminate changes that would have likely failed, and review all changes to improve the IT environment.

    Collaboration

    Change management planning brings increased communication and collaboration across groups by coordinating changes with business activities. The CAB brings a more formalized and centralized communication method for IT.

    Consistency

    Request for change templates and a structured process result in implementation, test, and backout plans being more consistent. Implementing processes for pre-approved changes also ensures these frequent changes are executed consistently and efficiently.

    Confidence

    Change management processes will give your organization more confidence through more accurate planning, improved execution of changes, less failure, and more control over the IT environment. This also leads to greater protection against audits.

    You likely need to improve change management more than any other infrastructure & operations process

    The image shows a vertical bar graph. Each segment of the graph is labelled for an infrastructure/operations process. Each segment has two bars one for effectiveness, and another for importance. The first segment, Change Management, is highlighted, with its Effectiveness at a 6.2 and Importance at 8.6

    Source: Info-Tech 2020; n=5,108 IT Professionals from 620 organizations

    Of the eight infrastructure and operations processes measured in Info-Tech’s IT Management and Governance Diagnostic (MGD) program, change management consistently has the second largest gap between importance and effectiveness of these processes.

    Executives and directors recognize the importance of change management but feel theirs is currently ineffective

    Info-Tech’s IT Management and Governance Diagnostic (MGD) program assesses the importance and effectiveness of core IT processes. Since its inception, the MGD has consistently identified change management as an area for immediate improvement.

    The image is a vertical bar graph, with four segments, each having 2 bars, one for Effectiveness and the other for Importance. The four segments are (with Effectiveness and Importance ratings in brackets, respectively): Frontline (6.5/8.6); Manager (6.6/8.9); Director (6.4/8.8); and Executive (6.1/8.8)

    Source: Info-Tech 2020; n=5,108 IT Professionals from 620 organizations

    Importance Scores

    No importance: 1.0-6.9

    Limited importance: 7.0-7.9

    Significant importance: 8.0-8.9

    Critical importance: 9.0-10.0

    Effectiveness Scores

    Not in place: n/a

    Not effective: 0.0-4.9

    Somewhat Ineffective: 5.0-5.9

    Somewhat effective: 6.0-6.9

    Very effective: 7.0-10.0

    There are several common misconceptions about change management

    Which of these have you heard in your organization?

     Reality
    “It’s just a small change; this will only take five minutes to do.” Even a small change can cause a business outage. That small fix could impact a large system connected to the one being fixed.
    “Ad hoc is faster; too many processes slow things down.” Ad hoc might be faster in some cases, but it carries far greater risk. Following defined processes keeps systems stable and risk-averse.
    “Change management is all about speed.” Change management is about managing risk. It gives the illusion of speed by reducing downtime and unplanned work.
    “Change management will limit our capacity to change.” Change management allows for a better alignment of process (release management) with governance (change management).

    Overcome perceived challenges to implementing change management to reap measurable reward

    Before: Informal Change Management

    Change Approval:

    • Changes do not pass through a formal review process before implementation.
    • 10% of released changes are approved.
    • Implementation challenge: Staff will resist having to submit formal change requests and assessments, frustrated at the prospect of having to wait longer to have changes approved.

    Change Prioritization

    • Changes are not prioritized according to urgency, risk, and impact.
    • 60% of changes are urgent.
    • Implementation challenge: Influential stakeholders accustomed to having changes approved and deployed might resist having to submit changes to a standard cost-benefit analysis.

    Change Deployment

    • Changes often negatively impact user productivity.
    • 25% of changes are realized as planned.
    • Implementation challenge: Engaging the business so that formal change freeze periods and regular maintenance windows can be established.

    After: Right-Sized Change Management

    Change Approval

    • All changes pass through a formal review process. Once a change is repeatable and well-tested, it can be pre-approved to save time. Almost no unauthorized changes are deployed.
    • 95% of changes are approved.
    • KPI: Decrease in change-related incidents

    Change Prioritization

    • The CAB prioritizes changes so that the business is satisfied with the speed of change deployment.
    • 35% of changes are urgent.
    • KPI: Decrease in change turnaround time.

    Change deployment

    • Users are always aware of impending changes and changes don’t interrupt critical business activities.
    • Over 80% of changes are realized as planned
    • KPI: Decrease in the number of failed deployments.

    Info-Tech’s methodology for change management optimization focuses on building standardized processes

     1. Define Change Management2. Establish Roles and Workflows3. Define the RFC and Post-Implementation Activities4. Measure, Manage, and Maintain
    Phase Steps

    1.1 Assess Maturity

    1.2 Categorize Changes and Build Your Risk Assessment

    2.1 Determine Roles and Responsibilities

    2.2 Build Core Workflows

    3.1 Design the RFC

    3.2 Establish Post-Implementation Activities

    4.1 Identify Metrics and Build the Change Calendar

    4.2 Implement the Project

      Change Management Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) Change Management Project Summary Template
    Phase Deliverables
    • Change Management Maturity Assessment Tool
    • Change Management Risk Assessment Tool
    • Change Manager Job Description
    • Change Management Process Library
    • Request for Change (RFC) Form Template
    • Change Management Pre-Implementation Checklist
    • Change Management Post-Implementation Checklist
    • Change Management Metrics Tool
    • Change Management
    • Communications Plan
    • Change Management Roadmap Tool

    Blueprint deliverables

    Each step of this blueprint is accompanied by supporting deliverables to help you accomplish your goals:

    Change Management Process Library

    Document your normal, pre-approved, and emergency change lifecycles with the core process workflows .

    Change Management Risk Assessment Tool

    Test Drive your impact and likelihood assessment questionnaires with the Change Management Risk Assessment Tool.

    Project Summary Template

    Summarize your efforts in the Optimize IT Change Management Improvement Initiative: Project Summary Template.

    Change Management Roadmap Tool

    Record your action items and roadmap your steps to a mature change management process.

    Key Deliverable:

    Change Management SOP

    Document and formalize your process starting with the change management standard operating procedure (SOP).

    These case studies illustrate the value of various phases of this project

    Define Change Management

    Establish Roles and Workflows

    Define RFC and Post-Implementation Activities

    Measure, Manage, and Maintain

    A major technology company implemented change management to improve productivity by 40%. This case study illustrates the full scope of the project.

    A large technology firm experienced a critical outage due to poor change management practices. This case study illustrates the scope of change management definition and strategy.

    Ignorance of change management process led to a technology giant experiencing a critical cloud outage. This case study illustrates the scope of the process phase.

    A manufacturing company created a makeshift CMDB in the absence of a CMDB to implement change management. This case study illustrates the scope of change intake.

    A financial institution tracked and recorded metrics to aid in the success of their change management program. This case study illustrates the scope of the implementation phase.

    Working through this project with Info-Tech can save you time and money

    Engaging in a Guided Implementation doesn’t just offer valuable project advice, it also results in significant cost savings.

    Guided ImplementationMeasured Vale
    Phase 1: Define Change Management
    • We estimate Phase 1 activities will take 2 FTEs 10 days to complete on their own, but the time saved by using Info-Tech’s methodology will cut that time in half, thereby saving $3,100 (2 FTEs * 5 days * $80,000/year).

    Phase 2: Establish Roles and Workflows

    • We estimate Phase 2 will take 2 FTEs 10 days to complete on their own, but the time saved by using Info-Tech’s methodology will cut that time in half, thereby saving $3,100 (2 FTEs * 5 days * $80,000/year).
    Phase 3: Define the RFC and Post-Implementation Activities
    • We estimate Phase 3 will take 2 FTEs 10 days to complete on their own, but the time saved by using Info-Tech’s methodology will cut that time in half, thereby saving $3,100 (2 FTEs * 5 days * $80,000/year).

    Phase 4: Measure, Manage, and Maintain

    • We estimate Phase 4 will take 2 FTEs 5 days to complete on their own, but the time saved by using Info-Tech’s methodology will cut that time in half, thereby saving $1,500 (2 FTEs * 2.5 days * $80,000/year).
    Total Savings $10,800

    Case Study

    Industry: Technology

    Source: Daniel Grove, Intel

    Intel implemented a robust change management program and experienced a 40% improvement in change efficiency.

    Founded in 1968, the world’s largest microchip and semiconductor company employs over 100,000 people. Intel manufactures processors for major players in the PC market including Apple, Lenovo, HP, and Dell.

    ITIL Change Management Implementation

    With close to 4,000 changes occurring each week, managing Intel’s environment is a formidable task. Before implementing change management within the organization, over 35% of all unscheduled downtime was due to errors resulting from change and release management. Processes were ad hoc or scattered across the organization and no standards were in place.

    Results

    After a robust implementation of change management, Intel experienced a number of improvements including automated approvals, the implementation of a formal change calendar, and an automated RFC form. As a result, Intel improved change productivity by 40% within the first year of the program’s implementation.

    Define Change Management

    Establish Roles and Workflows

    Define RFC and Post-Implementation Activities

    Measure, Manage, and Maintain

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    "Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful."

    Guided Implementation

    "Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track."

    Workshop

    "We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place."

    Consulting

    "Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project."

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks are used throughout all four options.

    Guided Implementation

    What does a typical GI on this topic look like?

    A Guided Implementation (GI) is series of calls with an Info-Tech analyst to help implement our best practices in your organization.

    A typical GI is between 8 to 12 calls over the course of 4 to 6 months.

    Define Change Management

    • Call #1: Introduce change concepts.
    • Call #2: Assess current maturity.
    • Call #3: Identify target-state capabilities.

    Establish Roles and Workflows

    • Call #4: Review roles and responsibilities.
    • Call #5: Review core change processes.

    Define RFC and Post- Implementation Activities

    • Call #6: Define change intake process.
    • Call #7: Create pre-implementation and post-implementation checklists.

    Measure, Manage, and Maintain

    • Call #8: Review metrics.
    • Call #9: Create roadmap.

    Workshop Overview

    Contact your account representative for more information.
    workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8889

     Day 1Day 2Day 3Day 4Day 5
    Activities

    Define Change Management

    1.1 Outline Strengths and Challenges

    1.2 Conduct a Maturity Assessment

    1.3 Build a Change Categorization Scheme

    1.4 Build Your Risk Assessment

    Establish Roles and Workflows

    2.1 Define the Change Manager Role

    2.2 Outline CAB Protocol and membership

    2.3 Build Normal Change Process

    2.4 Build Emergency Change Process

    2.5 Build Pre-Approved Change Process

    Define the RFC and Post-Implementation Activities

    3.1 Create an RFC Template

    3.2 Determine Post-Implementation Activities

    3.3 Build a Change Calendar Protocol

    Measure, Manage, and Maintain

    4.1 Identify Metrics and Reports

    4.2 Create Communications Plan

    4.3 Build an Implementation Roadmap

    Next Steps and Wrap-Up (offsite)

    5.1 Complete in-progress deliverables from previous four days

    5.2 Set up review time for workshop deliverables and to discuss next steps

    Deliverables
    1. Maturity Assessment
    2. Risk Assessment
    1. Change Manager Job Description
    2. Change Management Process Library
    1. Request for Change (RFC) Form Template
    2. Pre-Implementation Checklist
    3. Post-Implementation Checklist
    1. Metrics Tool
    2. Communications Plan
    3. Project Roadmap
    1. Change Management Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)
    2. Workshop Summary Deck

    Phase 1

    Define Change Management

    Define Change Management

    1.1 Assess Maturity

    1.2 Categorize Changes and Build Your Risk Assessment

    Establish Roles and Workflows

    2.1 Determine Roles and Responsibilities

    2.2 Build Core Workflows

    Define the RFC and Post-Implementation Activities

    3.1 Design the RFC

    3.2 Establish Post-Implementation Activities

    Measure, Manage, and Maintain

    4.1 Identify Metrics and Build the Change Calendar

    4.2 Implement the Project

    This phase will guide you through the following steps:

    • Assess Maturity
    • Categorize Changes and Build Your Risk Assessment

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • CIO
    • IT Managers
    • Change Manager
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board

    Step 1.1

    Assess Maturity

    Activities

    1.1.1 Outline the Organization’s Strengths and Challenges

    1.1.2 Complete a Maturity Assessment

    This step involves the following participants:

    • CIO
    • IT Managers
    • Change Manager
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board

    Outcomes of this step

    • An understanding of maturity change management processes and frameworks
    • Identification of existing change management challenges and potential causes
    • A framework for assessing change management maturity and an assessment of your existing change management processes

    Define Change Management

    Step 1.1: Assess Maturity → Step 1.2: Categorize Changes and Build Your Risk Assessment

    Change management is often confused with release management, but they are distinct processes

    Change

    • Change management looks at software changes as well as hardware, database, integration, and network changes, with the focus on stability of the entire IT ecosystem for business continuity.
    • Change management provides a holistic view of the IT environment, including dependencies, to ensure nothing is negatively affected by changes.
    • Change documentation is more focused on process, ensuring dependencies are mapped, rollout plans exist, and the business is not at risk.

    Release

    • Release and deployment are the detailed plans that bundle patches, upgrades, and new features into deployment packages, with the intent to change them flawlessly into a production environment.
    • Release management is one of many actions performed under change management’s governance.
    • Release documentation includes technical specifications such as change schedule, package details, change checklist, configuration details, test plan, and rollout and rollback plans.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Ensure the Release Manager is present as part of your CAB. They can explain any change content or dependencies, communicate business approval, and advise the service desk of any defects.

    Integrate change management with other IT processes

    As seen in the context diagram, change management interacts closely with many other IT processes including release management and configuration management (seen below). Ensure you delineate when these interactions occur (e.g. RFC updates and CMDB queries) and which process owns each task.

    The image is a chart mapping the interactions between Change Management and Configuration Management (CMDB).

    Avoid the challenges of poor change management

    1. Deployments
      • Too frequent: The need for frequent deployments results in reduced availability of critical business applications.
      • Failed deployments or rework is required: Deployments are not successful and have to be backed out of and then reworked to resolve issues with the installation.
      • High manual effort: A lack of automation results in high resource costs for deployments. Human error is likely, which adds to the risk of a failed deployment.
    2. Incidents
      • Too many unauthorized changes: If the process is perceived as cumbersome and ineffective, people will bypass it or abuse the emergency designation to get their changes deployed faster.
      • Changes cause incidents: When new releases are deployed, they create problems with related systems or applications.
    3. End Users
      • Low user satisfaction: Poor communication and training result in surprised and unhappy users and support staff.

    “With no controls in place, IT gets the blame for embarrassing outages. Too much control, and IT is seen as a roadblock to innovation.” – Anonymous, VP IT of a federal credit union

    1.1.1 Outline the Organization’s Strengths and Challenges

    Input

    • Current change documentation (workflows, SOP, change policy, etc.)
    • Organizational chart(s)

    Output

    • List of strengths and challenges for change management

    Materials

    Participants

    • CIO
    • IT Managers
    • Change Manager
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board
    1. As group, discuss and outline the change management challenges facing the organization. These may be challenges caused by poor change management processes or by a lack of process.
    2. Use the pain points found on the previous slide to help guide the discussion.
    3. As a group, also outline the strengths of change management and the strengths of the current organization. Use these strengths as a guide to know what practices to continue and what strengths you can leverage to improve the change management process.
    4. Record the activity results in the Project Summary Template.

    Download the Optimize IT Change Management Improvement Initiative: Project Summary Template

    Assess current change management maturity to create a plan for improvement

     ChaosReactiveControlled

    Proactive

    Optimized
    Change Requests No defined processes for submitting changes Low process adherence and no RFC form RFC form is centralized and a point of contact for changes exists RFCs are reviewed for scope and completion RFCs trend analysis and proactive change exists
    Change Review Little to no change risk assessment Risk assessment exists for each RFC RFC form is centralized and a point of contact for changes exists Change calendar exists and is maintained System and component dependencies exist (CMDB)
    Change Approval No formal approval process exists Approval process exists but is not widely followed Unauthorized changes are minimal or nonexistent Change advisory board (CAB) is established and formalized Trend analysis exists increasing pre-approved changes
    Post-Deployment No post-deployment change review exists Process exists but is not widely followed Reduction of change-related incidents Stakeholder satisfaction is gathered and reviewed Lessons learned are propagated and actioned
    Process Governance Roles & responsibilities are ad hoc Roles, policies & procedures are defined & documented Roles, policies & procedures are defined & documented KPIs are tracked, reported on, and reviewed KPIs are proactively managed for improvement

    Info-Tech Insight

    Reaching an optimized level is not feasible for every organization. You may be able to run a very good change management process at the Proactive or even Controlled stage. Pay special attention to keeping your goals attainable.

    1.1.2 Complete a Maturity Assessment

    Input

    • Current change documentation (workflows, SOP, change policy, etc.)

    Output

    • Assessment of current maturity level and goals to improve change management

    Materials

    Participants

    • Change Manager
    • Service Desk Manager
    • Operations (optional)
    1. Use Info-Tech’s Change Management Maturity Assessment Tool to assess the maturity and completeness of your change process.
    2. Significant gaps revealed in this assessment should be the focal points of your discussion when investigating root causes and brainstorming remediation activities:
      1. For each activity of each process area of change management, determine the degree of completeness of your current process.
      2. Review your maturity assessment results and discuss as a group potential reasons why you arrived at your maturity level. Identify areas where you should focus your initial attention for improvement.
      3. Regularly review the maturity of your change management practices by completing this maturity assessment tool periodically to identify other areas to optimize.

    Download the Change Management Maturity Assessment Tool

    Case Study

    Even Google isn’t immune to change-related outages. Plan ahead and communicate to help avoid change-related incidents

    Industry: Technology

    Source: The Register

    As part of a routine maintenance procedure, Google engineers moved App Engine applications between data centers in the Central US to balance out traffic.

    Unfortunately, at the same time that applications were being rerouted, a software update was in progress on the traffic routers, which triggered a restart. This temporarily diminished router capacity, knocking out a sizeable portion of Google Cloud.

    The server drain resulted in a huge spike in startup requests, and the routers simply couldn’t handle the traffic.

    As a result, 21% of Google App Engine applications hosted in the Central US experienced error rates in excess of 10%, while an additional 16% of applications experienced latency, albeit at a lower rate.

    Solution

    Thankfully, engineers were actively monitoring the implementation of the change and were able to spring into action to halt the problem.

    The change was rolled back after 11 minutes, but the configuration error still needed to be fixed. After about two hours, the change failure was resolved and the Google Cloud was fully functional.

    One takeaway for the engineering team was to closely monitor how changes are scheduled. Ultimately, this was the result of miscommunication and a lack of transparency between change teams.

    Step 1.2

    Categorize Changes and Build Your Risk Assessment

    Activities

    1.2.1 Define What Constitutes a Change

    1.2.2 Build a Change Categorization Scheme

    1.2.3 Build a Classification Scheme to Assess Impact

    1.2.4 Build a Classification Scheme to Define Likelihood

    1.2.5 Evaluate and Adjust Your Risk Assessment Scheme

    Define Change Management

    Step 1.1: Assess Maturity → Step 1.2: Categorize Changes and Build Your Risk Assessment

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Infrastructure/Applications Manager
    • Change Manager
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board

    Outcomes of this step

    • A clear definition of what constitutes a change in your organization
    • A defined categorization scheme to classify types of changes
    • A risk assessment matrix and tool for evaluating and prioritizing change requests according to impact and likelihood of risk

    Change must be managed to mitigate risk to the infrastructure

    Change management is the gatekeeper protecting your live environment.

    Successfully managed changes will optimize risk exposure, severity of impact, and disruption. This will result in the bottom-line business benefits of removal of risk, early realization of benefits, and savings of money and time.

    • IT change is constant; change requests will be made both proactively and reactively to upgrade systems, acquire new functionality, and to prevent or resolve incidents.
    • Every change to the infrastructure must pass through the change management process before being deployed to ensure that it has been properly assessed and tested, and to check that a backout /rollback plan is in place.
    • It will be less expensive to invest in a rigorous change management process than to resolve incidents, service disruptions, and outages caused by the deployment of a bad change.
    • Change management is what gives you control and visibility regarding what is introduced to the live environment, preventing incidents that threaten business continuity.

    80%

    In organizations without formal change management processes, about 80% (The Visible Ops Handbook) of IT service outage problems are caused by updates and changes to systems, applications, and infrastructure. It’s crucial to track and systematically manage change to fully understand and predict the risks and potential impact of the change.

    Attributes of a change

    Differentiate changes from other IT requests

    Is this in the production environment of a business process?

    The core business of the enterprise or supporting functions may be affected.

    Does the task affect an enterprise managed system?

    If it’s for a local application, it’s a service request

    How many users are impacted?

    It should usually impact more than a single user (in most cases).

    Is there a configuration, or code, or workflow, or UI/UX change?

    Any impact on a business process is a change; adding a user or a recipient to a report or mailing list is not a change.

    Does the underlying service currently exist?

    If it’s a new service, then it’s better described as a project.

    Is this done/requested by IT?

    It needs to be within the scope of IT for the change management process to apply.

    Will this take longer than one week?

    As a general rule, if it takes longer than 40 hours of work to complete, it’s likely a project.

    Defining what constitutes a change

    Every change request will initiate the change management process; don’t waste time reviewing requests that are out of scope.

    ChangeService Request (User)Operational Task (Backend)
    • Fixing defects in code
    • Changing configuration of an enterprise system
    • Adding new software or hardware components
    • Switching an application to another VM
    • Standardized request
    • New PC
    • Permissions request
    • Change password
    • Add user
    • Purchases
    • Change the backup tape
    • Delete temporary files
    • Maintain database (one that is well defined, repeatable, and predictable)
    • Run utilities to repair a database

    Do not treat every IT request as a change!

    • Many organizations make the mistake of calling a standard service request or operational task a “change.”
    • Every change request will initiate the change management process; don’t waste time reviewing requests that are out of scope.
    • While the overuse of RFCs for out-of-scope requests is better than a lack of process, this will slow the process and delay the approval of more critical changes.
    • Requiring an RFC for something that should be considered day-to-day work will also discourage people from adhering to the process, because the RFC will be seen as meaningless paperwork.

     

    1.2.1 Define What Constitutes a Change

    Input

    • List of examples of each category of the chart

    Output

    • Definitions for each category to be used at change intake

    Materials

    • Whiteboard/flip charts (or shared screen if working remotely)
    • Service catalog (if applicable)
    • Sticky notes
    • Markers/pens
    • Change Management SOP

    Participants

    • Infrastructure Manager
    • Change Manager
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board
    1. As a group, brainstorm examples of changes, projects, service requests (user), operational tasks (backend), and releases. You may add additional categories as needed (e.g. incidents).
    2. Have each participant write the examples on sticky notes and populate the following chart on the whiteboard/flip chart.
    3. Use the examples to draw lines and define what defines each category.
      • What makes a change distinct from a project?
      • What makes a change distinct from a service request?
      • What makes a change distinct from an operational task?
      • When do the category workflows cross over with other categories? (For example, when does a project interact with change management?)
    4. Record the definitions of requests and results in section 2.3 of the Change Management Standard Operating Procedure (SOP).
    ChangeProjectService Request (User)Operational Task (Backend)Release
    Changing Configuration ERP upgrade Add new user Delete temp files Software release

    Download the Change Management Standard Operating Procedure (SOP).

    Each RFC should define resources needed to effect the change

    In addition to assigning a category to each RFC based on risk assessment, each RFC should also be assigned a priority based on the impact of the change on the IT organization, in terms of the resources needed to effect the change.

    Categories include

    Normal

    Emergency

    Pre-Approved

    The majority of changes will be pre-approved or normal changes. Definitions of each category are provided on the next slide.

    Info-Tech uses the term pre-approved rather than the ITIL terminology of standard to more accurately define the type of change represented by this category.

    A potential fourth change category of expedited may be employed if you are having issues with process adherence or if you experience changes driven from outside change management’s control (e.g. from the CIO, director, judiciary, etc.) See Appendix I for more details.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Do not rush to designate changes as pre-approved. You may have a good idea of which changes may be considered pre-approved, but make sure they are in fact low-risk and well-documented before moving them over from the normal category.

    The category of the change determines the process it follows

     Pre-ApprovedNormalEmergency
    Definition
    • Tasks are well-known, documented, and proven
    • Budgetary approval is preordained or within control of change requester
    • Risk is low and understood
    • There’s a low probability of failure
    • All changes that are not pre-approved or emergency will be classified as normal
    • Further categorized by priority/risk
    • The change is being requested to resolve a current or imminent critical/severity-1 incident that threatens business continuity
    • Associated with a critical incident or problem ticket
    Trigger
    • The same change is built and changed repeatedly using the same install procedures and resulting in the same low-risk outcome
    • Upgrade or new functionality that will capture a business benefit
    • A fix to a current problem
    • A current or imminent critical incident that will impact business continuity
    • Urgency to implement the change must be established, as well as lack of any alternative or workaround
    Workflow
    • Pre-established
    • Repeatable with same sequence of actions, with minimal judgment or decision points
    • Dependent on the change
    • Different workflows depending on prioritization
    • Dependent on the change
    Approval
    • Change Manager (does not need to be reviewed by CAB)
    • CAB
    • Approval from the Emergency Change Advisory Board (E-CAB) is sufficient to proceed with the change
    • A retroactive RFC must be created and approved by the CAB

    Pay close attention to defining your pre-approved changes. They are going to be critical for running a smooth change management practice in a DevOps Environment

    1.2.2 Build a Change Categorization Scheme

    Input

    • List of examples of each change category

    Output

    • Definitions for each change category

    Materials

    • Whiteboard/flip charts (or shared screen if working remotely)
    • Service catalog (if applicable)
    • Sticky notes
    • Markers
    • Change Management SOP

    Participants

    • Infrastructure Manager
    • Change Manager
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board
    1. Discuss the change categories on the previous slide and modify the types of descriptions to suit your organization.
    2. Once the change categories or types are defined, identify several examples of change requests that would fall under each category.
    3. Types of normal changes will be further defined in the next activity and can be left blank for now.
    4. Examples are provided below. Capture your definitions in section 4 of your Change Management SOP.
    Pre-Approved (AKA Standard)NormalEmergency
    • Microsoft patch management/deployment
    • Windows update
    • Minor form changes
    • Service pack updates on non-critical systems
    • Advance label status on orders
    • Change log retention period/storage
    • Change backup frequency

    Major

    • Active directory server upgrade
    • New ERP

    Medium

    • Network upgrade
    • High availability implementation

    Minor

    • Ticket system go-live
    • UPS replacement
    • Cognos update
    • Any change other than a pre-approved change
    • Needed to resolve a major outage in a Tier 1 system

    Assess the risk for each normal change based on impact (severity) and likelihood (probability)

    Create a change assessment risk matrix to standardize risk assessment for new changes. Formalizing this assessment should be one of the first priorities of change management.

    The following slides guide you through the steps of formalizing a risk assessment according to impact and likelihood:

    1. Define a risk matrix: Risk matrices can either be a 3x3 matrix (Minor, Medium, or High Risk as shown on the next slide) or a 4x4 matrix (Minor, Medium, High, or Critical Risk).
    2. Build an impact assessment: Enable consistent measurement of impact for each change by incorporating a standardized questionnaire for each RFC.
    3. Build a likelihood assessment: Enable the consistent measurement of impact for each change by incorporating a standardized questionnaire for each RFC.
    4. Test drive your risk assessment and make necessary adjustments: Measure your newly formed risk assessment questionnaires against historical changes to test its accuracy.

    Consider risk

    1. Risk should be the primary consideration in classifying a normal change as Low, Medium, High. The extent of governance required, as well as minimum timeline to implement the change, will follow from the risk assessment.
    2. The business benefit often matches the impact level of the risk – a change that will provide a significant benefit to a large number of users may likely carry an equally major downside if deviations occur.

    Info-Tech Insight

    All changes entail an additional level of risk. Risk is a function of impact and likelihood. Risk may be reduced, accepted, or neutralized through following best practices around training, testing, backout planning, redundancy, timing and sequencing of changes, etc.

    Create a risk matrix to assign a risk rating to each RFC

    Every normal RFC should be assigned a risk rating.

    How is risk rating determined?

    • Priority should be based on the business consequences of implementing or denying the change.
    • Risk rating is assigned using the impact of the risk and likelihood/probability that the event may occur.

    Who determines priority?

    • Priority should be decided with the change requester and with the CAB, if necessary.
    • Don’t let the change requester decide priority alone, as they will usually assign it a higher priority than is justified. Use a repeatable, standardized framework to assess each request.

    How is risk rating used?

    • Risk rating is used to determine which changes should be discussed and assessed first.
    • Time frames and escalation processes should be defined for each risk level.

    RFCs need to clearly identify the risk level of the proposed change. This can be done through statement of impact and likelihood (low/medium/high) or through pertinent questions linked with business rules to assess the risk.

    Risk always has a negative impact, but the size of the impact can vary considerably in terms of cost, number of people or sites affected, and severity of the impact. Impact questions tend to be more objective and quantifiable than likelihood questions.

    Risk Matrix

    Risk Matrix. Impact vs. Likelihood. Low impact, Low Likelihood and Medium Impact, Medium Likelihood are minor risks. High Likelihood, Low Impact; Medium Likelihood, Medium Impact; and Low Likelihood, High Impact are Medium Risk. High Impact, High Likelihood; High Impact, Medium Likelihood; and Medium Impact, High Likelihood are Major risk.

    1.2.3 Build a Classification Scheme to Assess Impact

    Input

    • Current risk assessment (if available)

    Output

    • Tailored impact assessment

    Materials

    Participants

    • CIO
    • Infrastructure Manager
    • Change Manager
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board
    1. Define a set of questions to measure risk impact.
    2. For each question, assign a weight that should be placed on that factor.
    3. Define criteria for each question that would categorize the risk as high, medium, or low.
    4. Capture your results in section 4.3.1 of your Change Management SOP.
    Impact
    Weight Question High Medium Low
    15% # of people affected 36+ 11-35 <10
    20% # of sites affected 4+ 2-3 1
    15% Duration of recovery (minutes of business time) 180+ 30-18 <3
    20% Systems affected Mission critical Important Informational
    30% External customer impact Loss of customer Service interruption None

    1.2.4 Build a Classification Scheme to Define Likelihood

    Input

    • Current risk assessment (if available)

    Output

    • Tailored likelihood assessment

    Materials

    Participants

    • CIO
    • Infrastructure Manager
    • Change Manager
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board
    1. Define a set of questions to measure risk likelihood.
    2. For each question, assign a weight that should be placed on that factor.
    3. Define criteria for each question that would categorize the risk as high, medium, or low.
    4. Capture your results in section 4.3.2 of your Change Management SOP.
    LIKELIHOOD
    Weight Question High Medium Low
    25% Has this change been tested? No   Yes
    10% Have all the relevant groups (companies, departments, executives) vetted the change? No Partial Yes
    5% Has this change been documented? No   Yes
    15% How long is the change window? When can we implement? Specified day/time Partial Per IT choice
    20% Do we have trained and experienced staff available to implement this change? If only external consultants are available, the rating will be “medium” at best. No   Yes
    25% Has an implementation plan been developed? No   Yes

    1.2.5 Evaluate and Adjust Your Risk Assessment Scheme

    Input

    • Impact and likelihood assessments from previous two activities

    Output

    • Vetted risk assessment

    Materials

    Participants

    • CIO
    • Infrastructure Manager
    • Change Manager
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board
    1. Draw your risk matrix on a whiteboard or flip chart.
    2. As a group, identify up to 10 examples of requests for changes that would apply within your organization. Depending on the number of people participating, each person could identify one or two changes and write them on sticky notes.
    3. Take turns bringing your sticky notes up to the risk matrix and placing each where it belongs, according to the assessment criteria you defined.
    4. After each participant has taken a turn, discuss each change as a group and adjust the placement of any changes, if needed. Update the risk assessment weightings or questions, if needed.

    Download the Change Management Rick Assessment Tool.

    #

    Change Example

    Impact

    Likelihood

    Risk

    1

    ERP change

    High

    Medium

    Major

    2

    Ticket system go-live

    Medium

    Low

    Minor

    3

    UPS replacement

    Medium

    Low

    Minor

    4

    Network upgrade

    Medium

    Medium

    Medium

    5

    AD upgrade

    Medium

    Low

    Minor

    6

    High availability implementation

    Low

    Medium

    Minor

    7

    Key-card implementation

    Low

    High

    Medium

    8

    Anti-virus update

    Low

    Low

    Minor

    9

    Website

    Low

    Medium

    Minor

     

    Case Study

    A CMDB is not a prerequisite of change management. Don’t let the absence of a configuration management database (CMDB) prevent you from implementing change management.

    Industry: Manufacturing

    Source: Anonymous Info-Tech member

    Challenge

    The company was planning to implement a CMDB; however, full implementation was still one year away and subject to budget constraints.

    Without a CMDB, it would be difficult to understand the interdependencies between systems and therefore be able to provide notifications to potentially affected user groups prior to implementing technical changes.

    This could have derailed the change management project.

    Solution

    An Excel template was set up as a stopgap measure until the full implementation of the CMDB. The template included all identified dependencies between systems, along with a “dependency tier” for each IT service.

    Tier 1: The dependent system would not operate if the upstream system change resulted in an outage.

    Tier 2: The dependent system would suffer severe degradation of performance and/or features.

    Tier 3: The dependent system would see minor performance degradation or minor feature unavailability.

    Results

    As a stopgap measure, the solution worked well. When changes ran the risk of degrading downstream dependent systems, the impacted business system owner’s authorization was sought and end users were informed in advance.

    The primary takeaway was that a system to manage configuration linkages and system dependencies was key.

    While a CMDB is ideal for this use case, IT organizations shouldn’t let the lack of such a system stop progress on change management.

    Case Study (part 1 of 4)

    Intel used a maturity assessment to kick-start its new change management program.

    Industry: Technology

    Source: Daniel Grove, Intel

    Challenge

    Founded in 1968, the world’s largest microchip and semiconductor company employs over 100,000 people. Intel manufactures processors for major players in the PC market including Apple, Lenovo, HP, and Dell.

    Intel IT supports over 65,000 servers, 3.2 petabytes of data, over 70,000 PCs, and 2.6 million emails per day.

    Intel’s change management program is responsible for over 4,000 changes each week.

    Solution

    Due to the sheer volume of change management activities present at Intel, over 35% of unscheduled outages were the result of changes.

    Ineffective change management was identified as the top contributor of incidents with unscheduled downtime.

    One of the major issues highlighted was a lack of process ownership. The change management process at Intel was very fragmented, and that needed to change.

    Results

    Daniel Grove, Senior Release & Change Manager at Intel, identified that clarifying tasks for the Change Manager and the CAB would improve process efficiency by reducing decision lag time. Roles and responsibilities were reworked and clarified.

    Intel conducted a maturity assessment of the overall change management process to identify key areas for improvement.

    Phase 2

    Establish Roles and Workflows

    For running change management in DevOps environment, see Appendix II.

    Define Change Management

    1.1 Assess Maturity

    1.2 Categorize Changes and Build Your Risk Assessment

    Establish Roles and Workflows

    2.1 Determine Roles and Responsibilities

    2.2 Build Core Workflows

    Define RFC and Post-Implementation Activities

    3.1 Design the RFC

    3.2 Establish Post-Implementation Activities

    Measure, Manage, and Maintain

    4.1 Identify Metrics and Build the Change Calendar

    4.2 Implement the Project

    This phase will guide you through the following steps:

    • Determine Roles and Responsibilities
    • Build Core Workflows

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • CIO
    • IT Managers
    • Change Manager
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board

    Step 2.1

    Determine Roles and Responsibilities

    Activities

    2.1.1 Capture Roles and Responsibilities Using a RACI Chart

    2.1.2 Determine Your Change Manager’s Responsibilities

    2.1.3 Define the Authority and Responsibilities of Your CAB

    2.1.4 Determine an E-CAB Protocol for Your Organization

    Establish Roles and Workflows

    Step 2.1: Determine Roles and Responsibilities → Step 2.2: Build Core Workflows

    This step involves the following participants:

    • CIO
    • IT Managers
    • Change Manager
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board

    Outcomes of this step

    • Clearly defined responsibilities to form the job description for a Change Manager
    • Clearly defined roles and responsibilities for the change management team, including the business system owner, technical SME, and CAB members
    • Defined responsibilities and authority of the CAB
    • Protocol for an emergency CAB (E-CAB) meeting

    Identify roles and responsibilities for your change management team

    Business System Owner

    • Provides downtime window(s)
    • Advises on need for change (prior to creation of RFC)
    • Validates change (through UAT or other validation as necessary)
    • Provides approval for expedited changes (needs to be at executive level)

    Technical Subject Matter Expert (SME)

    • Advises on proposed changes prior to RFC submission
    • Reviews draft RFC for technical soundness
    • Assesses backout/rollback plan
    • Checks if knowledgebase has been consulted for prior lessons learned
    • Participates in the PIR, if necessary
    • Ensures that the service desk is trained on the change

    CAB

    • Approves/rejects RFCs for normal changes
    • Reviews lessons learned from PIRs
    • Decides on the scope of change management
    • Reviews metrics and decides on remedial actions
    • Considers changes to be added to list of pre-approved changes
    • Communicates to organization about upcoming changes

    Change Manager

    • Reviews RFCs for completeness
    • Ensures RFCs brought to the CAB have a high chance of approval
    • Chairs CAB meetings, including scheduling, agenda preparation, reporting, and follow-ups
    • Manages post-implementation reviews and reporting
    • Organizes internal communications (within IT)

    2.1.1 Capture Roles and Responsibilities Using a RACI Chart

    Input

    • Current SOP

    Output

    • Documented roles and responsibilities in change management in a RACI chart

    Materials

    Participants

    • CIO
    • IT Managers
    • Change Manager
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board
    1. As a group, work through developing a RACI chart to determine the roles and responsibilities of individuals involved in the change management practice based on the following criteria:
      • Responsible (performs the work)
      • Accountable (ensures the work is done)
      • Consulted (two-way communication)
      • Informed (one-way communication)
    2. Record your results in slide 14 of the Project Summary Template and section 3.1 of your Change Management SOP.
    Change Management TasksOriginatorSystem OwnerChange ManagerCAB MemberTechnical SMEService DeskCIO/ VP ITE-CAB Member
    Review the RFC C C A C R C R  
    Validate changes C C A C R C R  
    Assess test plan A C R R C   I  
    Approve the RFC I C A R C   I  
    Create communications plan R I A     I I  
    Deploy communications plan I I A I   R    
    Review metrics   C A R   C I  
    Perform a post implementation review   C R A     I  
    Review lessons learned from PIR activities     R A   C    

    Designate a Change Manager to own the process, change templates, and tools

    The Change Manager will be the point of contact for all process questions related to change management.

    • The Change Manager needs the authority to reject change requests, regardless of the seniority of the requester.
    • The Change Manager needs the authority to enforce compliance to a standard process.
    • The Change Manager needs enough cross-functional subject-matter expertise to accurately evaluate the impact of change from both an IT and business perspective.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Some organizations will not be able to assign a dedicated Change Manager, but they must still task an individual with change review authority and with ownership of the risk assessment and other key parts of the process.

    Responsibilities

    1. The Change Manager is your first stop for change approval. Both the change management and release and deployment management processes rely on the Change Manager to function.
    2. Every single change that is applied to the live environment, from a single patch to a major change, must originate with a request for change (RFC), which is then approved by the Change Manager to proceed to the CAB for full approval.
    3. Change templates and tools, such as the change calendar, list of preapproved changes, and risk assessment template are controlled by the Change Manager.
    4. The Change Manager also needs to have ownership over gathering metrics and reports surrounding deployed changes. A skilled Change Manager needs to have an aptitude for applying metrics for continual improvement activities.

    2.1.2 Document Your Change Manager’s Responsibilities

    Input

    • Current Change Manager job description (if available)

    Output

    • Change Manager job description and list of responsibilities

    Materials

    • Whiteboard/flip charts (or shared screen if working remotely)
    • Markers/pens
    • Info-Tech’s Change Manager Job Description
    • Change Management SOP

    Participants

    • CIO
    • IT Managers
    • Change Manager
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board

    1.Using the previous slide, Info-Tech’s Change Manager Job Description, and the examples below, brainstorm responsibilities for the Change Manager.

    2.Record the responsibilities in Section 3.2 of your Change Management SOP.

    Example:

    Change Manager: James Corey

    Responsibilities

    1. Own the process, tools, and templates.
    2. Control the Change Management SOP.
    3. Provide standard RFC forms.
    4. Distribute RFCs for CAB review.
    5. Receive all initial RFCs and check them for completion.
    6. Approve initial RFCs.
    7. Approve pre-approved changes.
    8. Approve the conversion of normal changes to pre-approved changes.
    9. Assemble the Emergency CAB (E-CAB) when emergency change requests are received.
    10. Approve submission of RFCs for CAB review.
    11. Chair the CAB:
      • Set the CAB agenda and distribute it at least 24 hours before the meeting.
      • Ensure the agenda is adhered to.
      • Make the final approval/prioritization decision regarding a change if the CAB is deadlocked and cannot come to an agreement.
      • Distribute CAB meeting minutes to all members and relevant stakeholders.

    Download the Change Manager Job Description

    Create a Change Advisory Board (CAB) to provide process governance

    The primary functions of the CAB are to:

    1. Protect the live environment from poorly assessed, tested, and implemented changes.
      • CAB approval is required for all normal and emergency changes.
      • If a change results in an incident or outage, the CAB is effectively responsible; it’s the responsibility of the CAB to assess and accept the potential impact of every change.
    2. Prioritize changes in a way that fairly reflects change impact and urgency.
      • Change requests will originate from multiple stakeholders, some of whom have competing interests.
      • It’s up to the CAB to prioritize these requests effectively so that business need is balanced with any potential risk to the infrastructure.
      • The CAB should seek to reduce the number of emergency/expedited changes.
    3. Schedule deployments in a way that minimizes conflict and disruption.
      • The CAB uses a change calendar populated with project work, upcoming organizational initiatives, and change freeze periods. They will schedule changes around these blocks to avoid disrupting user productivity.
      • The CAB should work closely with the release and deployment management teams to coordinate change/release scheduling.

    See what responsibilities in the CAB’s process are already performed by the DevOps lifecycle (e.g. authorization, deconfliction etc.). Do not duplicate efforts.

    Use diverse representation from the business to form an effective CAB

    The CAB needs insight into all areas of the business to avoid approving a high-risk change.

    Based on the core responsibilities you have defined, the CAB needs to be composed of a diverse set of individuals who provide quality:

    • Change need assessments – identifying the value and purpose of a proposed change.
    • Change risk assessments – confirmation of the technical impact and likelihood assessments that lead to a risk score, based on the inputs in RFC.
    • Change scheduling – offer a variety of perspectives and responsibilities and will be able to identify potential scheduling conflicts.
     CAB RepresentationValue Added
    Business Members
    • CIO
    • Business Relationship Manager
    • Service Level Manager
    • Business Analyst
    • Identify change blackout periods, change impact, and business urgency.
    • Assess impact on fiduciary, legal, and/or audit requirements.
    • Determine acceptable business risk.
    IT Operations Members
    • Managers representing all IT functions
    • IT Directors
    • Subject Matter Experts (SMEs)
    • Identify dependencies and downstream impacts.
    • Identify possible conflicts with pre-existing OLAs and SLAs.
    CAB Attendees
    • Specific SMEs, tech specialists, and business and vendor reps relevant to a particular change
    • Only attend meetings when invited by the Change Manager
    • Provide detailed information and expertise related to their particular subject areas.
    • Speak to requirements, change impact, and cost.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Form a core CAB (members attend every week) and an optional CAB (members who attend only when a change impacts them or when they can provide value in discussions about a change). This way, members can have their voice heard without spending every week in a meeting where they do not contribute.

    2.1.3 Define the Authority and Responsibilities of Your CAB

    Input

    • Current SOP or CAB charter (if available)

    Output

    • Documented list of CAB authorities and responsibilities

    Materials

    Participants

    • CIO
    • IT Managers
    • Change Manager
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board

    1.Using the previous slide and the examples below, list the authorities and responsibilities of your CAB.

    2.Record the responsibilities in section 3.3.2 of your Change Management SOP and the Project Summary Template.

    Example:

    CAP AuthorityCAP Responsibilities
    • Final authority over the deployment of all normal and emergency changes.
    • Authority to absorb the risk of a change.
    • Authority to set the change calendar:
      • Maintenance windows.
      • Change freeze periods.
      • Project work.
      • Authority to delay changes.
    • Evaluate all normal and emergency changes.
    • Verify all normal change test, backout, and implementation plans.
    • Verify all normal change test results.
    • Approve all normal and emergency changes.
    • Prioritize all normal changes.
    • Schedule all normal and emergency changes.
    • Review failed change deployments.

    Establish an emergency CAB (E-CAB) protocol

    • When an emergency change request is received, you will not be able to wait until the regularly scheduled CAB meeting.
    • As a group, decide who will sit on the E-CAB and what their protocol will be when assessing and approving emergency changes.

    Change owner conferences with E-CAB (best efforts to reach them) through email or messaging.

    E-CAB members and business system owners are provided with change details. No decision is made without feedback from at least one E-CAB member.

    If business continuity is being affected, the Change Manager has authority to approve change.

    Full documentation of the change (a retroactive RFC) is done after the change and is then reviewed by the CAB.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Members of the E-CAB should be a subset of the CAB who are typically quick to respond to their messages, even at odd hours of the night.

    2.1.4 Determine an E-CAB Protocol for Your Organization

    Input

    • Current SOP or CAB charter (if available)

    Output

    • E-CAB protocol

    Materials

    Participants

    • CIO
    • IT Managers
    • Change Manager
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board
    1. Gather the members of the E-CAB and other necessary representatives from the change management team.
    2. Determine the order of operations for the E-CAB in the event that an emergency change is needed.
    3. Consult the example emergency protocol below. Determine what roles and responsibilities are involved at each stage of the emergency change’s implementation.
    4. Document the E-CAB protocol in section 3.4 of your Change Management SOP.

    Example

    Assemble E-CAB

    Assess Change

    Test (if Applicable)

    Deploy Change

    Create Retroactive RFC

    Review With CAB

    Step 2.2

    Build Core Workflows

    Activities

    2.2.1 Build a CMDB-lite as a Reference for Requested Changes

    2.2.2 Create a Normal Change Process

    2.2.3 Create a Pre-Approved Change Process

    2.2.4 Create an Emergency Change Process

    Establish Roles and Workflows

    Step 2.1: Determine Roles and Responsibilities → Step 2.2: Build Core Workflows

    This step involves the following participants:

    • CIO
    • IT Managers
    • Change Manager
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board

    Outcomes of this step

    • Emergency change workflow
    • Normal process workflow
    • Pre-approved change workflow

    Establishing Workflows: Change Management Lifecycle

    Improve

    • A post-implementation review assesses the value of the actual change measured against the proposed change in terms of benefits, costs, and impact.
    • Results recorded in the change log.
    • Accountability: Change Manager Change Implementer

    Request

    • A change request (RFC) can be submitted via paper form, phone, email, or web portal.
    • Accountability: Change requester/Initiator

    Assess

    • The request is screened to ensure it meets an agreed-upon set of business criteria.
    • Changes are assessed on:
      • Impact of change
      • Risks or interdependencies
      • Resourcing and costs
    • Accountability: Change Manager

    Plan

    • Tasks are assigned, planned, and executed.
    • Change schedule is consulted and necessary resources are identified.
    • Accountability: Change Manager

    Approve

    • Approved requests are sent to the most efficient channel based on risk, urgency, and complexity.
    • Change is sent to CAB members for final review and approval
    • Accountability: Change Manager
      • Change Advisory Board

    Implement

    • Approved changes are deployed.
    • A rollback plan is created to mitigate risk.
    • Accountability: Change Manager Change Implementer

    Establishing workflows: employ a SIPOC model for process definition

    A good SIPOC (supplier, input, process, output, customer) model helps establish the boundaries of each process step and provides a concise definition of the expected outcomes and required inputs. It’s a useful and recommended next step for every workflow diagram.

    For change management, employ a SIPOC model to outline your CAB process:

    Supplier

    • Who or what organization provides the inputs to the process? The supplier can be internal or external.

    Input

    • What goes into the process step? This can be a document, data, information, or a decision.

    Process

    • Activities that occur in the process step that’s being analyzed.

    Output

    • What does the process step produce? This can be a document, data, information, or a decision.

    Customer

    • Who or what organization(s) takes the output of the process? The customer can be internal or external.

    Optional Fields

    Metrics

    • Top-level indicators that usually relate to the input and output, e.g. turnaround time, risk matrix completeness.

    Controls

    • Checkpoints to ensure process step quality.

    Dependencies

    • Other process steps that require the output.

    RACI

    • Those who are Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, or Informed (RACI) about the input, output, and/or process.

    Establish change workflows: assess requested changes to identify impact and dependencies

    An effective change assessment workflow is a holistic process that leaves no stone unturned in an effort to mitigate risk before any change reaches the approval stage. The four crucial areas of risk in a change workflow are:

    Dependencies

    Identify all components of the change.

    Ask how changes will affect:

    • Services on the same infrastructure?
    • Applications?
    • Infrastructure/app architecture?
    • Security?
    • Ability to support critical systems?

    Business Impact

    Frame the change from a business point of view to identify potential disruptions to business activities.

    Your assessment should cover:

    • Business processes
    • User productivity
    • Customer service
    • BCPs

    SLA Impact

    Each new change can impact the level of service available.

    Examine the impact on:

    • Availability of critical systems
    • Infrastructure and app performance
    • Infrastructure and app capacity
    • Existing disaster recovery plans and procedures

    Required Resources

    Once risk has been assessed, resources need to be identified to ensure the change can be executed.

    These include:

    • People (SMEs, tech support, work effort/duration)
    • System time for scheduled implementation
    • Hardware or software (new or existing, as well as tools)

    Establishing workflows: pinpoint dependencies to identify the need for additional changes

    An assessment of each change and a query of the CMDB needs to be performed as part of the change planning process to mitigate outage risk.

    • A version upgrade on one piece of software may require another component to be upgraded as well. For example, an upgrade to the database management system requires that an application that uses the database be upgraded or modified.
    • The sequence of the release must also be determined, as certain components may need to be upgraded before others. For example, if you upgrade the Exchange Server, a Windows update must be installed prior to the Exchange upgrade.
    • If you do not have a CMDB, consider building a CMDB-lite, which consists of a listing of systems, primary users, SMEs, business owners, and system dependencies (see next slide).

    Services Impacted

    • Have affected services been identified?
    • Have supporting services been identified?
    • Has someone checked the CMDB to ensure all dependencies have been accounted for?
    • Have we referenced the service catalog so the business approves what they’re authorizing?

    Technical Teams Impacted

    • Who will support the change throughout testing and implementation?
    • Will additional support be needed?
    • Do we need outside support from eternal suppliers?
    • Has someone checked the contract to ensure any additional costs have been approved?

    Build a dependency matrix to avoid change related collisions (optional)

    A CMDB-lite does not replace a CMDB but can be a valuable tool to leverage when requesting changes if you do not currently have configuration management. Consider the following inputs when building your own CMDB-lite.

    • System
      • To build a CMDB-lite, start with the top 10 systems in your environment that experience changes. This list can always be populated iteratively.
    • Primary Users
      • Listing the primary users will give a change requester a first glance at the impact of the change.
      • You can also use this information when looking at the change communication and training after the change is implemented.
    • SME/Backup
      • These are the staff that will likely build and implement the change. The backup is listed in case the primary is on holiday.
    • Business System Owner
      • The owner of the system is one of the people needed to sign off on the change. Having their support from the beginning of a change is necessary to build and implement it successfully.
    • Tier 1 Dependency
      • If the primary system experiences and outage, Tier 1 dependency functionality is also lost. To request a change, include the business system owner signoffs of the Tier 1 dependencies of the primary system.
    • Tier 2 Dependency
      • If the primary system experiences an outage, Tier 2 dependency functionality is lost, but there is an available workaround. As with Tier 1, this information can help you build a backout plan in case there is a change-related collision.
    • Tier 3 Dependency
      • Tier 3 functionality is not lost if the primary system experiences an outage, but nice-to-haves such as aesthetics are affected.

    2.2.1 Build a CMDB-lite as a Reference for Requested Changes

    Input

    • Current system ownership documentation

    Output

    • Documented reference for change requests (CMDB-lite)

    Materials

    • Whiteboard/flip charts (or shared screen if working remotely)
    • Sticky notes
    • Markers/pens

    Participants

    • CIO
    • IT Managers
    • Change Manager
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board
    1. Start with a list of your top 10-15 systems/services with the highest volume of changes.
    2. Using a whiteboard, flip chart, or shared screen, complete the table below by filling the corresponding Primary Users, SMEs, Business System Owner, and Dependencies as shown below. It may help to use sticky notes.
    3. Iteratively populate the table as you notice gaps with incoming changes.
    SystemPrimary UsersSMEBackup SME(s)Business System OwnerTier 1 Dependency (system functionality is down)Tier 2 (impaired functionality/ workaround available)Tier 3 Dependency (nice to have)
    Email Enterprise Naomi Amos James
    • ITSMs
    • Scan-to-email
    • Reporting
     
    • Lots
    Conferencing Tool Enterprise Alex Shed James
    • Videoconferencing
    • Conference rooms (can use Facebook messenger instead in worst case scenario)
    • IM
    ITSM (Service Now) Enterprise (Intl.) Anderson TBD Mike
    • Work orders
    • Dashboards
    • Purchasing
     
    ITSM (Manage Engine) North America Bobbie Joseph Mike
    • Work orders
    • Dashboards
    • Purchasing
     

    Establishing workflows: create standards for change approvals to improve efficiency

    • Not all changes are created equal, and not all changes require the same degree of approval. As part of the change management process, it’s important to define who is the authority for each type of change.
    • Failure to do so can create bureaucratic bottlenecks if each change is held to an unnecessary high level of scrutiny, or unplanned outages may occur due to changes circumventing the formal approval process.
    • A balance must be met and defined to ensure the process is not bypassed or bottlenecked.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Define a list pre-approved changes and automate them (if possible) using your ITSM solution. This will save valuable time for more important changes in the queue.

    Example:

    Change CategoryChange Authority
    Pre-approved change Department head/manager
    Emergency change E-CAB
    Normal change – low and medium risk CAB
    Normal change – high risk CAB and CIO (for visibility)

    Example process: Normal Change – Change Initiation

    Change initiation allows for assurance that the request is in scope for change management and acts as a filter for out-of-scope changes to be redirected to the proper workflow. Initiation also assesses who may be assigned to the change and the proper category of the change, and results in an RFC to be populated before the change reaches the build and test phase.

    The image is a horizontal flow chart, depicting an example of a change process.

    The change trigger assessment is critical in the DevOps lifecycle. This can take a more formal role of a technical review board (TRB) or, with enough maturity, may be automated. Responsibilities such as deconfliction, dependency identification, calendar query, and authorization identification can be done early in the lifecycle to decrease or eliminate the burden on CAB.

    For the full process, refer to the Change Management Process Library.

    Example process: Normal Change – Technical Build and Test

    The technical build and test stage includes all technical prerequisites and testing needed for a change to pass before proceeding to approval and implementation. In addition to a technical review, a solution consisting of the implementation, rollback, communications, and training plan are also built and included in the RFC before passing it to the CAB.

    The image is a flowchart, showing the process for change during the technical build and test stage.

    For the full process, refer to the Change Management Process Library.

    Example process: Normal Change – Change Approval (CAB)

    Change approval can start with the Change Manager reviewing all incoming RFCs to filter them for completeness and check them for red flags before passing them to the CAB. This saves the CAB from discussing incomplete changes and allows the Change Manager to set a CAB agenda before the CAB meeting. If need be, change approval can also set vendor communications necessary for changes, as well as the final implementation date of the change. The CAB and Change Manager may follow up with the appropriate parties notifying them of the approval decision (accepted, rescheduled, or rejected).

    The image shows a flowchart illustrating the process for change approval.

    For the full process, refer to the Change Management Process Library.

    Example process: Normal Change – Change Implementation

    Changes should not end at implementation. Ensure you define post-implementation activities (documentation, communication, training etc.) and a post-implementation review in case the change does not go according to plan.

    The image is a flowchart, illustrating the work process for change implementation and post-implementation review.

    For the full process, refer to the Change Management Process Library.

    2.2.2 Create a Normal Change Process

    Input

    • Current SOP/workflow library

    Output

    • Normal change process

    Materials

    Participants

    • CIO
    • IT Managers
    • Change Manager
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board
    1. Gather representatives from the change management team.
    2. Using the examples shown on the previous few slides, work as a group to determine the workflow for a normal change, with particular attention to the following sub-processes:
      1. Request
      2. Assessment
      3. Plan
      4. Approve
      5. Implementation and Post-Implementation Activities
    3. Optionally, you may create variations of the workflow for minor, medium, and major changes (e.g. there will be fewer authorizations for minor changes).
    4. For further documentation, you may choose to run the SIPOC activity for your CAB as outlined on this slide.
    5. Document the resulting workflows in the Change Management Process Library and section 11 of your Change Management SOP.

    Download the Change Management Process Library.

    Identify and convert low-risk normal changes to pre-approved once the process is established

    As your process matures, begin creating a list of normal changes that might qualify for pre-approval. The most potential for value in gains from change management comes from re-engineering and automating of high-volume changes. Pre-approved changes should save you time without threatening the live environment.

    IT should flag changes they would like pre-approved:

    • Once your change management process is firmly established, hold a meeting with all staff that make change requests and build changes.
    • Run a training session detailing the traits of pre-approved changes and ask these individuals to identify changes that might qualify.
    • These changes should be submitted to the Change Manager and reviewed, with the help of the CAB, to decide whether or not they qualify for pre-approval.

    Pre-approved changes are not exempt from due diligence:

    • Once a change is designated as pre-approved, the deployment team should create and compile all relevant documentation:
      • An RFC detailing the change, dependencies, risk, and impact.
      • Detailed procedures and required resources.
      • Implementation and backout plan.
      • Test results.
    • When templating the RFC for pre-approved changes, aim to write the documentation as if another SME were to implement it. This reduces confusion, especially if there’s staff turnover.
    • The CAB must approve, sign off, and keep a record of all documents.
    • Pre-approved changes must still be documented and recorded in the CMDB and change log after each deployment.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    At the beginning of a change management process, there should be few active pre-approved changes. However, prior to launch, you may have IT flag changes for conversion.

    Example process: Pre-Approved Change Process

    The image shows two horizontal flow charts, the first labelled Pre-Approval of Recurring RFC, and the second labelled Implementation of Child RFC.

    For the full process, refer to the Change Management Process Library.

    Review the pre-approved change list regularly to ensure the list of changes are still low-risk and repeatable.

    IT environments change. Don’t be caught by surprise.

    • Changes which were once low-risk and repeatable may cause unforeseen incidents if they are not reviewed regularly.
    • Dependencies change as the IT environment changes. Ensure that the changes on the pre-approved change list are still low-risk and repeatable, and that the documentation is up to date.
    • If dependencies have changed, then move the change back to the normal category for reassessment. It may be redesignated as a pre-approved change once the documentation is updated.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Other reasons for moving a pre-approved change back to the normal category is if the change led to an incident during implementation or if there was an issue during implementation.

    Seek new pre-approved change submissions. → Re-evaluate the pre-approved change list every 4-6 months.

    The image shows a horizontal flow chart, depicting the process for a pre-approved change list review.

    For the full process, refer to the Change Management Process Library.

    2.2.3 Create a Pre-Approved Change Process

    Input

    • Current SOP/workflow library

    Output

    • Pre-approved change process

    Materials

    Participants

    • CIO
    • IT Managers
    • Change Manager
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board
    1. Gather representatives from the change management team.
    2. Using the examples shown on the previous few slides, work as a group to determine the workflow for a pre-approved change, with particular attention to the following sub-processes:
      1. Request
      2. Assessment
      3. Plan
      4. Approve
    3. Document the process of a converting a normal change to pre-approved. Include the steps from flagging a low-risk change to creating the related RFC template.
    4. Document the resulting workflows in the Change Management Process Library and sections 4.2 and 13 of your Change Management SOP.

    Reserve the emergency designation for real emergencies

    • Emergency changes have one of the following triggers:
      • A critical incident is impacting user productivity.
      • An imminent critical incident will impact user productivity.
    • Unless a critical incident is being resolved or prevented, the change should be categorized as normal.
    • An emergency change differs from a normal change in the following key aspects:
      • An emergency change is required to recover from a major outage – there must be a validated service desk critical incident ticket.
      • An urgent business requirement is not an “emergency.”
      • An RFC is created after the change is implemented and the outage is over.
      • A review by the full CAB occurs after the change is implemented.
      • The first responder and/or the person implementing the change may not be the subject matter expert for that system.
    • In all cases, an RFC must be created and the change must be reviewed by the full CAB. The review should occur within two business days of the event.
    Sample ChangeQuick CheckEmergency?
    Install the latest critical patches from the vendor. Are the patches required to resolve or prevent an imminent critical incident? No
    A virus or worm invades the network and a patch is needed to eliminate the threat. Is the patch required to resolve or prevent an imminent critical incident? Yes

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Change requesters should be made aware that senior management will be informed if an emergency RFC is submitted inappropriately. Emergency requests trigger urgent CAB meetings, are riskier to deploy, and delay other changes waiting in the queue.

    Example process: Emergency Change Process

    The image is a flowchart depicting the process for an emergency change process

    When building your emergency change process, have your E-CAB protocol from activity 2.1.4 handy.

    • Focus on the following requirements for an emergency process:
      • E-CAB protocol and scope: Does the SME need authorization first before working on the change or can the SME proceed if no E-CAB members respond?
      • Documentation and communication to stakeholders and CAB after the emergency change is completed.
      • Input from incident management.

    For the full process, refer to the Change Management Process Library.

    2.2.4 Create an Emergency Change Process

    Input

    • Current SOP/workflow library

    Output

    • Emergency change process

    Materials

    Participants

    • CIO
    • IT Managers
    • Change Manager
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board
    1. Gather representatives from the change management team.
    2. Using the examples shown on the previous few slides, work as a group to determine the workflow for an emergency change, with particular attention to the following sub-processes:
      1. Request
      2. Assessment
      3. Plan
      4. Approve
    3. Ensure that the E-CAB protocol from activity 2.1.4 is considered when building your process.
    4. Document the resulting workflows in the Change Management Process Library and section 12 of your Change Management SOP.

    Case Study (part 2 of 4)

    Intel implemented a robust change management process.

    Industry: Technology

    Source: Daniel Grove, Intel

    Challenge

    Founded in 1968, the world’s largest microchip and semiconductor company employs over 100,000 people. Intel manufactures processors for major players in the PC market including Apple, Lenovo, HP, and Dell.

    Intel IT supports over 65,000 servers, 3.2 petabytes of data, over 70,000 PCs, and 2.6 million emails per day.

    Intel’s change management program is responsible for over 4,000 changes each week.

    Solution

    Intel identified 37 different change processes and 25 change management systems of record with little integration.

    Software and infrastructure groups were also very siloed, and this no doubt contributed to the high number of changes that caused outages.

    The task was simple: standards needed to be put in place and communication had to improve.

    Results

    Once process ownership was assigned and the role of the Change Manager and CAB clarified, it was a simple task to streamline and simplify processes among groups.

    Intel designed a new, unified change management workflow that all groups would adopt.

    Automation was also brought into play to improve how RFCs were generated and submitted.

    Phase 3

    Define the RFC and Post-Implementation Activities

    Define Change Management

    1.1 Assess Maturity

    1.2 Categorize Changes and Build Your Risk Assessment

    Establish Roles and Workflows

    2.1 Determine Roles and Responsibilities

    2.2 Build Core Workflows

    Define the RFC and Post-Implementation Activities

    3.1 Design the RFC

    3.2 Establish Post-Implementation Activities

    Measure, Manage, and Maintain

    4.1 Identify Metrics and Build the Change Calendar

    4.2 Implement the Project

    This phase will guide you through the following activities:

    • Design the RFC
    • Establish Post-Implementation Activities

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • IT Director
    • Infrastructure Manager
    • Change Manager
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board

    Step 3.1

    Design the RFC

    Activities

    3.1.1 Evaluate Your Existing RFC Process

    3.1.2 Build the RFC Form

    Define the RFC and Post-Implementation Activities

    Step 3.1: Design the RFC

    Step 3.2: Establish Post-Implementation Activities

    This step involves the following participants:

    • CIO
    • IT Managers
    • Change Manager
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board

    Outcomes of this step

    • A full RFC template and process that compliments the workflows for the three change categories

    A request for change (RFC) should be submitted for every non-standard change

    An RFC should be submitted through the formal change management practice for every change that is not a standard, pre-approved change (a change which does not require submission to the change management practice).

    • The RFC should contain all the information required to approve a change. Some information will be recorded when the change request is first initiated, but not everything will be known at that time.
    • Further information can be added as the change progresses through its lifecycle.
    • The level of detail that goes into the RFC will vary depending on the type of change, the size, and the likely impact of the change.
    • Other details of the change may be recorded in other documents and referenced in the RFC.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Keep the RFC form simple, especially when first implementing change management, to encourage the adoption of and compliance with the process.

    RFCs should contain the following information, at a minimum:

    1. Contact information for requester
    2. Description of change
    3. References to external documentation
    4. Items to be changed, reason for the change, and impact of both implementing and not implementing the change
    5. Change type and category
    6. Priority and risk assessment
    7. Predicted time frame, resources, and cost
    8. Backout or remediation plan
    9. Proposed approvers
    10. Scheduled implementation time
    11. Communications plan and post-implementation review

    3.1.1 Evaluate Your Existing RFC Process

    Input

    • Current RFC form or stock ITSM RFC
    • Current SOP (if available)

    Output

    • List of changes to the current RFC form and RFC process

    Materials

    Participants

    • IT Director
    • Infrastructure Manager
    • Change Manager
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board
    1. If the organization is already using an RFC form, review it as a group now and discuss its contents:
      • Does this RFC provide adequate information for the Change Manager and/or CAB to review?
      • Should any additional fields be added?
    2. Show the participants Info-Tech’s Request for Change Form Template and compare it to the one the organization is currently using.
    3. As a group, finalize an RFC table of contents that will be used to formalize a new or improved RFC.
    4. Decide which fields should be filled out by the requester before the initial RFC is submitted to the Change Manager:
      • Many sections of the RFC are relevant for change assessment and review. What information does the Change Manager need when they first receive a request?
      • The Change Manager needs enough information to ensure that the change is in scope and has been properly categorized.
    5. Decide how the RFC form should be submitted and reviewed; this can be documented in section 5 of your Change Management SOP.

    Download the Request for Change Form Template.

    Design the RFC to encourage process buy-in

    • When building the RFC, split the form up into sections that follow the normal workflow (e.g. Intake, Assessment and Build, Approval, Implementation/PIR). This way the form walks the requester through what needs to be filled and when.
    • Revisit the form periodically and solicit feedback to continually improve the user experience. If there’s information missing on the RFC that the CAB would like to know, add the fields. If there are sections that are not used or not needed for documentation, remove them.
    • Make sure the user experience surrounding your RFC form is a top priority – make it accessible, otherwise change requesters simply will not use it.
    • Take advantage of your ITSM’s dropdown lists, automated notifications, CMDB integrations, and auto-generated fields to ease the process of filling the RFC

    Draft:

    • Change requester
    • Requested date of deployment
    • Change risk: low/medium/high
    • Risk assessment
    • Description of change
    • Reason for change
    • Change components

    Technical Build:

    • Assess change:
      • Dependencies
      • Business impact
      • SLA impact
      • Required resources
      • Query the CMS
    • Plan and test changes:
      • Test plan
      • Test results
      • Implementation plan
      • Backout plan
      • Backout plan test results

    CAB:

    • Approve and schedule changes:
      • Final CAB review
      • Communications plan

    Complete:

    • Deploy changes:
      • Post-implementation review

    Designing your RFC: RFC draft

    • Change requester – link your change module to the active directory to pull the change requester’s contact information automatically to save time.
    • A requested date of deployment gives approvers information on timeline and can be used to query the change calendar for possible conflicts
    • Information about risk assessment based on impact and likelihood questionnaires are quick to fill out but provide a lot of information to the CAB. The risk assessment may not be complete at the draft stage but can be updated as the change is built. Ensure this field is up-to- date before it reaches CAB.
    • If you have a technical review stage where changes are directed to the proper workflow and resourcing is assessed, the description, reason, and change components are high-level descriptors of the change that will aid in discovery and lining the change up with the business vision (viability from both a technical and business standpoint).
    • Change requester
    • Requested date of deployment
    • Change Risk: low/medium/high
    • Risk assessment
    • Description of change
    • Reason for change
    • Change components

    Use the RFC to point to documentation already gathered in the DevOps lifecycle to cut down on unnecessary manual work while maintaining compliance.

    Designing your RFC: technical build

    • Dependencies and CMDB query, along with the proposed implementation date, are included to aid in calendar deconfliction and change scheduling. If there’s a conflict, it’s easier to reschedule the proposed change early in the lifecycle.
    • Business, SLA impact, and required resources can be tracked to provide the CAB with information on the business resources required. This can also be used to prioritize the change if conflicts arise.
    • Implementation, test, and backout plans must be included and assessed to increase the probability that a change will be implemented without failure. It’s also useful in the case of PIRs to determine root causes of change-related incidents.
    • Assess change:
      • Dependencies
      • Business impact
      • SLA impact
      • Required resources
      • Query the CMS
    • Plan and test changes:
      • Test plan
      • Test results
      • Implementation plan
      • Backout plan
      • Backout plan test results

    Designing your RFC: approval and deployment

    • Documenting approval, rejection, and rescheduling gives the change requester the go-ahead to proceed with the change, rationale on why it was prioritized lower than another change (rescheduled), or rationale on rejection.
    • Communications plans for appropriate stakeholders can also be modified and forwarded to the communications team (e.g. service desk or business system owners) before deployment.
    • Post-implementation activities and reviews can be conducted if need be before a change is closed. The PIR, if filled out, should then be appended to any subsequent changes of the same nature to avoid making the same mistake twice.
    • Approve and schedule changes:
      • Final CAB review
      • Communications plan
    • Deploy changes:
      • Post-implementation review

    Standardize the request for change protocol

    1. Submission Standards
      • Electronic submission will make it easier for CAB members to review the documentation.
      • As the change goes through the assessment, plan, and test phase, new documentation (assessments, backout plans, test results, etc.) can be attached to the digital RFC for review by CAB members prior to the CAB meeting.
      • Change management software won’t be necessary to facilitate the RFC submission and review; a content repository system, such as SharePoint, will suffice.
    2. Designate the first control point
      • All RFCs should be submitted to a single point of contact.
      • Ideally, the Change Manager or Technical Review Board should fill this role.
      • Whoever is tasked with this role needs the subject matter expertise to ensure that the change has been categorized correctly, to reject out-of-scope requests, or to ask that missing information be provided before the RFC moves through the full change management practice.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Technical and SME contacts should be noted in each RFC so they can be easily consulted during the RFC review.

    3.1.2 Build the RFC Form

    Input

    • Current RFC form or stock ITSM RFC
    • Current SOP (if available)

    Output

    • List of changes to the current RFC and RFC process

    Materials

    Participants

    • IT Director
    • Infrastructure Manager
    • Change Manager
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board
    1. Use Info-Tech’s Request for Change Form Template as a basis for your RFC form.
    2. Use this template to standardize your change request process and ensure that the appropriate information is documented effectively each time a request is made. The change requester and Change Manager should consolidate all information associated with a given change request in this form. This form will be submitted by the change requester and reviewed by the Change Manager.

    Case Study (part 3 of 4)

    Intel implemented automated RFC form generation.

    Industry: Technology

    Source: Daniel Grove, Intel

    Challenge

    Founded in 1968, the world’s largest microchip and semiconductor company employs over 100,000 people. Intel manufactures processors for major players in the PC market including Apple, Lenovo, HP, and Dell.

    Intel IT supports over 65,000 servers, 3.2 petabytes of data, over 70,000 PCs, and 2.6 million emails per day.

    Intel’s change management program is responsible for over 4,000 changes each week.

    Solution

    One of the crucial factors that was impacting Intel’s change management efficiency was a cumbersome RFC process.

    A lack of RFC usage was contributing to increased ad hoc changes being put through the CAB, and rescheduled changes were quite high.

    Additionally, ad hoc changes were also contributing heavily to unscheduled downtime within the organization.

    Results

    Intel designed and implemented an automated RFC form generator to encourage end users to increase RFC usage.

    As we’ve seen with RFC form design, the UX/UI of the form needs to be top notch, otherwise end users will simply circumvent the process. This will contribute to the problems you are seeking to correct.

    Thanks to increased RFC usage, Intel decreased emergency changes by 50% and reduced change-caused unscheduled downtime by 82%.

    Step 3.2

    Establish Post-Implementation Activities

    Activities

    3.2.1 Determine When the CAB Would Reject Tested Changes

    3.2.2 Create a Post-Implementation Activity Checklist

    Define the RFC and Post-Implementation Activities

    Step 3.1: Design RFC

    Step 3.2: Establish Post-Implementation Activities

    This step involves the following participants:

    • CIO
    • IT Managers
    • Change Manager
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board

    Outcomes of this step

    • A formalized post-implementation process for continual improvement

    Why would the CAB reject a change that has been properly assessed and tested?

    Possible reasons the CAB would reject a change include:

    • The product being changed is approaching its end of life.
    • The change is too costly.
    • The timing of the change conflicts with other changes.
    • There could be compliance issues.
    • The change is actually a project.
    • The risk is too high.
    • There could be regulatory issues.
    • The peripherals (test, backout, communication, and training plans) are incomplete.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Many reasons for rejection (listed above) can be caught early on in the process during the technical review or change build portion of the change. The earlier you catch these reasons for rejection, the less wasted effort there will be per change.

    Sample RFCReason for CAP Rejection
    There was a request for an update to a system that a legacy application depends on and only a specific area of the business was aware of the dependency. The CAB rejects it due to the downstream impact.
    There was a request for an update to a non-supported application, and the vendor was asking for a premium support contract that is very costly. It’s too expensive to implement, despite the need for it. The CAB will wait for an upgrade to a new application.
    There was a request to update application functionality to a beta release. The risk outweighs the business benefits.

    Determine When the CAB Would Reject Tested Changes

    Input

    • Current SOP (if available)

    Output

    • List of reasons to reject tested changes

    Materials

    • Whiteboard/flip charts (or shared screen if working remotely)
    • Projector
    • Markers/pens
    • Laptop with ITSM admin access
    • Project Summary Template

    Participants

    • IT Director
    • Infrastructure Manager
    • Change Manager
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board

    Avoid hand-offs to ensure a smooth implementation process

    The implementation phase is the final checkpoint before releasing the new change into your live environment. Once the final checks have been made to the change, it’s paramount that teams work together to transition the change effectively rather than doing an abrupt hand-off. This could cause a potential outage.

    1.

    • Deployment resources identified, allocated, and scheduled
    • Documentation complete
    • Support team trained
    • Users trained
    • Business sign-off
    • Target systems identified and ready to receive changes
    • Target systems available for installation maintenance window scheduled
    • Technical checks:
      • Disk space available
      • Pre-requisites met
      • Components/Services to be updated are stopped
      • All users disconnected
    • Download Info-Tech’sChange Management Pre-Implementation Checklist

    Implement change →

    2.

    1. Verification – once the change has been implemented, verify that all requirements are fulfilled.
    2. Review – ensure that all affected systems and applications are operating as predicted. Update change log.
    3. Transition – a crucial phase of implementation that’s often overlooked. Once the change implementation is complete from a technical point of view, it’s imperative that the team involved with the change inform and train the group responsible for managing the new change.

    Create a backout plan to reduce the risk of a failed change

    Every change process needs to plan for the potential for failure and how to address it effectively. Change management’s solution to this problem is a backout plan.

    A backout plan needs to contain a record of the steps that need to be taken to restore the live environment back to its previous state and maintain business continuity. A good backout plan asks the following questions:

    1. How will failure be determined? Who will make the determination to back out of a change be made and when?
    2. Do we fix on fail or do we rollback to the previous configuration?
    3. Is the service desk aware of the impending change? Do they have proper training?

    Notify the Service Desk

    • Notify the Service Desk about backout plan initiation.

    Disable Access

    • Disable user access to affected system(s).

    Conduct Checks

    • Conduct checks to all affected components.

    Enable User Access

    • Enable user access to affected systems.

    Notify the Service Desk

    • Notify the service desk that the backout plan was successful.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    As part of the backout plan, consider the turnback point in the change window. That is, the point within the change window where you still have time to fully back out of the change.

    Ensure the following post-implementation review activities are completed

    Service Catalog

    Update the service catalog with new information as a result of the implemented change.

    CMDB

    Update new dependencies present as a result of the new change.

    Asset DB

    Add notes about any assets newly affected by changes.

    Architecture Map

    Update your map based on the new change.

    Technical Documentation

    Update your technical documentation to reflect the changes present because of the new change.

    Training Documentation

    Update your training documentation to reflect any information about how users interact with the change.

    Use a post-implementation review process to promote continual improvement

    The post-implementation review (PIR) is the most neglected change management activity.

    • All changes should be reviewed to understand the reason behind them, appropriateness, and recommendations for next steps.
    • The Change Manager manages the completion of information PIRs and invites RFC originators to present their findings and document the lessons learned.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Review PIR reports at CAB meetings to highlight the root causes of issues, action items to close identified gaps, and back-up documentation required. Attach the PIR report to the relevant RFC to prevent similar changes from facing the same issues in the future.

    1. Why do a post-implementation review?
      • Changes that don’t fail but don’t perform well are rarely reviewed.
      • Changes may fail subtly and still need review.
      • Changes that cause serious failures (i.e. unplanned downtime) receive analysis that is unnecessarily in-depth.
    2. What are the benefits?
      • A proactive, post-implementation review actually uses less resources than reactionary change reviews.
      • Root-cause analysis of failed changes, no matter what the impact.
      • Insight into changes that took longer than projected.
      • Identification of previously unidentified risks affecting changes.

    Determine the strategy for your PIR to establish a standardized process

    Capture the details of your PIR process in a table similar to the one below.

    Frequency Part of weekly review (IT team meeting)
    Participants
    • Change Manager
    • Originator
    • SME/supervisor/impacted team(s)

    Categories under review

    Current deviations and action items from previous PIR:

    • Complete
    • Partially complete
    • Complete, late
    • Change failed, rollback succeeded
    • Change failed, rollback failed
    • Major deviation from implementation plan
    Output
    • Root cause or failure or deviation
    • External factors
    • Remediation focus areas
    • Remediation timeline (follow-up at appropriate time)
    Controls
    • Reviewed at next CAB meeting
    • RFC close is dependent on completion of PIR
    • Share with the rest of the technical team
    • Lessons learned stored in the knowledgebase and attached to RFC for easy search of past issues.

    3.2.2 Create a Post-Implementation Activity Checklist

    Input

    • Current SOP (if available)

    Output

    • List of reasons to reject tested changes

    Materials

    Participants

    • CIO
    • IT Managers
    • Change Manager
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board
    1. Gather representatives from the change management team.
    2. Brainstorm duties to perform following the deployment of a change. Below is a sample list:
      • Example:
        • Was the deployment successful?
          • If no, was the backout plan executed successfully?
        • List change-related incidents
        • Change assessment
          • Missed dependencies
          • Inaccurate business impact
          • Incorrect SLA impact
          • Inaccurate resources
            • Time
            • Staff
            • Hardware
        • System testing
        • Integration testing
        • User acceptance testing
        • No backout plan
        • Backout plan failure
        • Deployment issues
    3. Record your results in the Change Management Post-Implementation Checklist.

    Download the Change Management Post-Implementation Checklist

    Case Study

    Microsoft used post-implementation review activities to mitigate the risk of a critical Azure outage.

    Industry: Technology

    Source: Jason Zander, Microsoft

    Challenge

    In November 2014, Microsoft deployed a change intended to improve Azure storage performance by reducing CPU footprint of the Azure Table Front-Ends.

    The deployment method was an incremental approach called “flighting,” where software and configuration deployments are deployed incrementally to Azure infrastructure in small batches.

    Unfortunately, this software deployment caused a service interruption in multiple regions.

    Solution

    Before the software was deployed, Microsoft engineers followed proper protocol by testing the proposed update. All test results pointed to a successful implementation.

    Unfortunately, engineers pushed the change out to the entire infrastructure instead of adhering to the traditional flighting protocol.

    Additionally, the configuration switch was incorrectly enabled for the Azure Blob storage Front-Ends.

    A combination of the two mistakes exposed a bug that caused the outage.

    Results

    Thankfully, Microsoft had a backout plan. Within 30 minutes, the change was rolled back on a global scale.

    It was determined that policy enforcement was not integrated across the deployment system. An update to the system shifted the process of policy enforcement from human-based decisions and protocol to automation via the deployment platform.

    Defined PIR activities enabled Microsoft to take swift action against the outage and mitigate the risk of a serious outage.

    Phase 4

    Measure, Manage, and Maintain

    Define Change Management

    1.1 Assess Maturity

    1.2 Categorize Changes and Build Risk Assessment

    Establish Roles and Workflows

    2.1 Determine Roles and Responsibilities

    2.2 Build Core Workflows

    Define RFC and Post-Implementation Activities

    3.1 Design RFC

    3.2 Establish post-implementation activities

    Measure, Manage, and Maintain

    4.1 Identify Metrics and Build the Change Calendar

    4.2 Implement the Project

    This phase will guide you through the following activities:

    • Identify Metrics and Build the Change Calendar
    • Implement the Project

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • CIO/IT Director
    • IT Managers
    • Change Manager

    Step 4.1

    Identify Metrics and Build the Change Calendar

    Activities

    4.1.1 Create an Outline for Your Change Calendar

    4.1.2 Determine Metrics, Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), and Critical Success Factors (CSFs)

    4.1.3 Track and Record Metrics Using the Change Management Metrics Tool

    Measure, Manage, and Maintain

    Step 4.1: Identify Metrics and Build the Change Calendar

    Step 4.2: Implement the Project

    This step involves the following participants:

    • CIO/IT Director
    • IT Managers
    • Change Manager

    Outcomes of this step

    • Clear definitions of change calendar content
    • Guidelines for change calendar scheduling
    • Defined metrics to measure the success of change management with associated reports, KPIs, and CSFs

    Enforce a standard method of prioritizing and scheduling changes

    The impact of not deploying the change and the benefit of deploying it should determine its priority.

    Risk of Not Deploying

    • What is the urgency of the change?
    • What is the risk to the organization if the change is not deployed right away?
    • Will there be any lost productivity, service disruptions, or missed critical business opportunities?
      • Timing
        • Does the proposed timing work with the approved changes already on the change schedule?
        • Has the change been clash checked so there are no potential conflicts over services or resources?
      • Once prioritized, a final deployment date should be set by the CAB. Check the change calendar first to avoid conflicts.

    Positive Impact of Deployment

    • What benefits will be realized once the change is deployed?
    • How significant is the opportunity that triggered the change?
    • Will the change lead to a positive business outcome (e.g. increased sales)?

    “The one who has more clout or authority is usually the one who gets changes scheduled in the time frame they desire, but you should really be evaluating the impact to the organization. We looked at the risk to the business of not doing the change, and that’s a good way of determining the criticality and urgency of that change.” – Joseph Sgandurra, Director, Service Delivery, Navantis

    Info-Tech Insight

    Avoid a culture where powerful stakeholders are able to push change deployment on an ad hoc basis. Give the CAB the full authority to make approval decisions based on urgency, impact, cost, and availability of resources.

    Develop a change schedule to formalize the planning process

    A change calendar will help the CAB schedule changes more effectively and increase visibility into upcoming changes across the organization.

    1. Establish change windows in a consistent change schedule:
      • Compile a list of business units that would benefit from a change.
      • Look for conflicts in the change schedule.
      • Avoid scheduling two or more major business units in a day.
      • Consider clients when building your change windows and change schedule.
    2. Gain commitments from key participants:
      • These individuals can confirm if there are any unusual or cyclical business requirements that will impact the schedule.
    3. Properly control your change calendar to improve change efficiency:
      • Look at the proposed start and end times: Are they sensible? Does the implementation window leave time for anything going wrong or needing to roll back the change?
      • Special considerations: Are there special circumstances that need to be considered? Ask the business if you don’t know.
      • The key principle is to have a sufficient window available for implementing changes so you only need to set up calendar freezes for sound business or technical reasons.

    Our mantra is to put it on the calendar. Even if it’s a preapproved change and doesn’t need a vote, having it on the calendar helps with visibility. The calendar is the one-stop shop for scheduling and identifying change dependencies.“ – Wil Clark, Director of Service and Performance Management, University of North Texas Systems

    Provide clear definitions of what goes on the change calendar and who’s responsible

    Roles

    • The Change Manager will be responsible for creating and maintaining a change calendar.
    • Only the Change Manager can physically alter the calendar by adding a new change after the CAB has agreed upon a deployment date.
    • All other CAB members, IT support staff, and other impacted stakeholders should have access to the calendar on a read-only basis to prevent people from making unauthorized changes to deployment dates.

    Inputs

    • Freeze periods for individual business departments/applications (e.g. finance month-end periods, HR payroll cycle, etc. – all to be investigated).
    • Maintenance windows and planned outage periods.
    • Project schedules, and upcoming major/medium changes.
    • Holidays.
    • Business hours (some departments work 9-5, others work different hours or in different time zones, and user acceptance testing may require business users to be available).

    Guidelines

    • Business-defined freeze periods are the top priority.
    • No major or medium normal changes should occur during the week between Christmas and New Year’s Day.
    • Vendor SLA support hours are the preferred time for implementing changes.
    • The vacation calendar for IT will be considered for major changes.
    • Change priority: High > Medium > Low.
    • Minor changes and preapproved changes have the same priority and will be decided on a case-by-case basis.

    The change calendar is a critical pre-requisite to change management in DevOps. Use the calendar to be proactive with proposed implementation dates and deconfliction before the change is finished.

    4.1.1 Create Guidelines for Your Change Calendar

    Input

    • Current change calendar guidelines

    Output

    • Change calendar inputs and schedule checklist

    Materials

    Participants

    • Change Manager
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board
    • Service Desk Manager
    • Operations (optional)
    1. Gather representatives from the change management team.
      • Example:
        • The change calendar/schedule includes:
          • Approved and scheduled normal changes.
          • Scheduled project work.
          • Scheduled maintenance windows.
          • Change freeze periods with affected users noted:
            • Daily/weekly freeze periods.
            • Monthly freeze periods.
            • Annual freeze periods.
            • Other critical business events.
    2. Create a checklist to run through before each change is scheduled:
      • Check the schedule and assess resource availability:
        • Will user productivity be impacted?
        • Are there available resources (people and systems) to implement the change?
        • Is the vendor available? Is there a significant cost attached to pushing change deployment before the regularly scheduled refresh?
        • Are there dependencies? Does the deployment of one change depend on the earlier deployment of another?
    3. Record your results in your Project Summary Template.

    Start measuring the success of your change management project using three key metrics

    Number of change-related incidents that occur each month

    • Each month, record the number of incidents that can be directly linked to a change. This can be done using an ITSM tool or manually by service desk staff.
    • This is a key success metric: if you are not tracking change-related incidents yet, start doing so as soon as possible. This is the metric that the CIO and business stakeholders will be most interested in because it impacts users directly.

    Number of unauthorized changes applied each month

    • Each month, record the number of changes applied without approval. This is the best way to measure adherence to the process.
    • If this number decreases, it demonstrates a reduction in risk, as more changes are formally assessed and approved before being deployed.

    Percentage of emergency changes

    • Each month, compare the number of emergency change requests to the total number of change requests.
    • Change requesters often designate changes as emergencies as a way of bypassing the process.
    • A reduction in emergency changes demonstrates that your process is operating smoothly and reduces the risk of deploying changes that have not been properly tested.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Start simple. Metrics can be difficult to tackle if you’re starting from scratch. While implementing your change management practice, use these three metrics as a starting point, since they correlate well with the success of change management overall. The following few slides provide more insight into creating metrics for your change process.

    If you want more insight into your change process, measure the progress of each step in change management with metrics

    Improve

    • Number of repeat failures (i.e. making the same mistake twice)
    • Number of changes converted to pre-approved
    • Number of changes converted from pre-approved back to normal

    Request

    • What percentage of change requests have errors or lack appropriate support?
    • What percentage of change requests are actually projects, service requests, or operational tasks?
    • What percentage of changes have been requested before (i.e. documented)?

    Assess

    • What percentage of change requests are out of scope?
    • What percentage of changes have been requested before (i.e. documented)?
    • What are the percentages of changes by category (normal, pre-approved, emergency)?

    Plan

    • What percentage of change requests are reviewed by the CAB that should have been pre-approved or emergency (i.e. what percentage of changes are in the wrong category)?

    Approve

    • Number of changes broken down by department (business unit/IT department to be used in making core/optional CAB membership more efficient)
    • Number of workflows that can be automated

    Implement

    • Number of changes completed on schedule
    • Number of changes rolled back
    • What percentage of changes caused an incident?

    Use metrics to inform project KPIs and CSFs

    Leverage the metrics from the last slide and convert them to data communicable to IT, management, and leadership

    • To provide value, metrics and measurements must be actionable. What actions can be taken as a result of the data being presented?
    • If the metrics are not actionable, there is no value and you should question the use of the metric.
    • Data points in isolation are mostly meaningless to inform action. Observe trends in your metrics to inform your decisions.
    • Using a framework to develop measurements and metrics provides a defined methodology that enables a mapping of base measurements through CSFs.
    • Establishing the relationship increases the value that measurements provide.

    Purposely use SDLC and change lifecycle metrics to find bottlenecks and automation candidates.

    Metrics:

    Metrics are easily measured datapoints that can be pulled from your change management tool. Examples: Number of changes implemented, number of changes without incident.

    KPIs:

    Key Performance Indicators are metrics presented in a way that is easily digestible by stakeholders in IT. Examples: Change efficiency, quality of changes.

    CSFs:

    Critical Success Factors are measures of the business success of change management taken by correlating the CSF with multiple KPIs. Examples: consistent and efficient change management process, a change process mapped to business needs

    List in-scope metrics and reports and align them to benefits

    Metric/Report (by team)Benefit
    Total number of RFCs and percentages by category (pre-approved, normal, emergency, escalated support, expedited)
    • Understand change management activity
    • Tracking maturity growth
    • Identifying “hot spots”
    Pre-approved change list (and additions/removals from the list) Workload and process streamlining (i.e. reduce “red tape” wherever possible)
    Average time between RFC lifecycle stages (by service/application) Advance planning for proposed changes
    Number of changes by service/application/hardware class
    • Identifying weaknesses in the architecture
    • Vendor-specific TCO calculations
    Change triggers Business- vs. IT-initiated change
    Number of RFCs by lifecycle stage Workload planning
    List of incidents related to changes Visible failures of the CM process
    Percentage of RFCs with a tested backout/validation plan Completeness of change planning
    List of expedited changes Spotlighting poor planning and reducing the need for this category going forward (“The Hall of Shame”)
    CAB approval rate Change coordinator alignment with CAB priorities – low approval rate indicates need to tighten gatekeeping by the change coordinator
    Calendar of changes Planning

    4.1.2 Determine Metrics, Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), and Critical Success Factors (CSFs)

    Input

    • Current metrics

    Output

    • List of trackable metrics, KPIs and CSFs

    Materials

    Participants

    • Change Manager
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board
    • Service Desk Manager
    • Operations (optional)
    1. Draw three tables for metrics, KPIs, and CSFs.
    2. Starting with the CSF table, fill in all relevant CSFs that your group wishes to track and measure.
    3. Next, work to determine relevant KPIs correlated with the CSFs and metrics needed to measure the KPIs. Use the tables included below (taken from section 14 of the Change Management SOP) to guide the process.
    4. Record the results in the tables in section 14 of your Change Management SOP.
    5. Decide on where and when to review the metrics to discuss your change management strategy. Designate and owner and record in the RACI and Communications section of your Change Management SOP.
    Ref #Metric

    M1

    Number of changes implemented for a time period
    M2 Number of changes successfully implemented for a time period
    M3 Number of changes implemented causing incidents
    M4 Number of accepted known errors when change is implemented
    M5 Total days for a change build (specific to each change)
    M6 Number of changes rescheduled
    M7 Number of training questions received following a change
    Ref#KPIProduct
    K1 Successful changes for a period of time (approach 100%) M2 / M1 x 100%
    K2 Changes causing incidents (approach 0%) M3 / M1 x 100%
    K3 Average days to implement a change ΣM5 / M1
    K4 Change efficiency (approach 100%) [1 - (M6 / M1)] x 100%
    K5 Quality of changes being implemented (approach 100%) [1 - (M4 / M1)] x 100%
    K6 Change training efficiency (approach 100%) [1 - (M7 / M1)] x 100%
    Ref#CSFIndicator
    C1 Successful change management process producing quality changes K1, K5
    C2 Consistent efficient change process K4, K6
    C3 Change process maps to business needs K5, K6

    Measure changes in selected metrics to evaluate success

    Once you have implemented a standardized change management practice, your team’s goal should be to improve the process, year over year.

    • After a process change has been implemented, it’s important to regularly monitor and evaluate the CSFs, KPIs, and metrics you chose to evaluate. Examine whether the process change you implemented has actually resolved the issue or achieved the goal of the critical success factor.
    • Establish a schedule for regularly reviewing the key metrics. Assess changes in those metrics and determine progress toward reaching objectives.
    • In addition to reviewing CSFs, KPIs, and metrics, check in with the release management team and end users to measure their perceptions of the change management process once an appropriate amount of time has passed.
    • Ensure that metrics are telling the whole story and that reporting is honest in order to be informative.

    Outcomes of standardizing change management should include:

    1. Improved efficiency, effectiveness, and quality of changes.
    2. Changes and processes are more aligned with the business needs and strategy.
    3. Improved maturity of change processes.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Make sure you’re measuring the right things and considering all sources of information. It’s very easy to put yourself in a position where you’re congratulating yourselves for improving on a specific metric such as number of releases per month, but satisfaction remains low.

    4.1.3 Track and Record Metrics Using the Change Management Metrics Tool

    Input

    • Current metrics

    Output

    • List of trackable metrics, KPIs and CSFs to be observed over the length of a year

    Materials

    Participants

    • Change Manager
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board
    • Service Desk Manager
    • Operations (optional)

    Tracking the progress of metrics is paramount to the success of any change management process. Use Info-Tech’s Change Management Metrics Tool to record metrics and track your progress. This tool is intended to be a substitute for organizations who do not have the capability to track change-related metrics in their ITSM tool.

    1. Input metrics from the previous activity to track over the course of a year.
    2. To record your metrics, open the tool and go to tab 2. The tool is currently primed to record and track five metrics. If you need more than that, you can edit the list in the hidden calculations tab.
    3. To see the progress of your metrics, move to tab 3 to view a dashboard of all metrics in the tool.

    Download the Change Management Metrics Tool

    Case Study

    A federal credit union was able to track maturity growth through the proper use of metrics.

    Industry: Federal Credit Union (anonymous)

    Source: Info-Tech Workshop

    Challenge

    At this federal credit union, the VP of IT wanted a tight set of metrics to engage with the business, communicate within IT, enable performance management of staff, and provide visibility into workload demands, among other requirements.

    The organization was suffering from “metrics fatigue,” with multiple reports being generated from all groups within IT, to the point that weekly/monthly reports were being seen as spam.

    Solution

    Stakeholders were provided with an overview of change management benefits and were asked to identify one key attribute that would be useful to their specific needs.

    Metrics were designed around the stakeholder needs, piloted with each stakeholder group, fine-tuned, and rolled out.

    Some metrics could not be automated off-the-shelf and were rolled out in a manual fashion. These metrics were subsequently automated and finally made available through a dashboard.

    Results

    The business received clear guidance regarding estimated times to implement changes across different elements of the environment.

    The IT managers were able to plan team workloads with visibility into upstream change activity.

    Architects were able to identify vendors and systems that were the leading source of instability.

    The VP of IT was able to track the maturity growth of the change management process and proactively engage with the business on identified hot spots.

    Step 4.2

    Implement the Project

    Activities

    4.2.1 Use a Communications Plan to Gain End User Buy-In

    4.2.2 Create a Project Roadmap to Track Your Implementation Progress

    Measure, Manage, and Maintain

    Step 4.1: Identify Metrics and Build the Change Calendar

    Step 3.2: Implement the Project

    This step involves the following participants:

    • CIO/IT Director
    • IT Managers
    • Change Manager

    Outcomes of this step

    • A communications plan for key messages to communicate to relevant stakeholders and audiences
    • A roadmap with assigned action items to implement change management

    Success of the new process will depend on introducing change and gaining acceptance

    Change management provides value by promptly evaluating and delivering changes required by the business and by minimizing disruption and rework caused by failed changes. Communication of your new change management process is key. If people do not understand the what and why, it will fail to provide the desired value.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Gather feedback from end users about the new process: if the process is too bureaucratic, end users are more likely to circumvent it.

    Main Challenges with Communication

    • Many people fail before they even start because they are buried in a mess created before they arrived – either because of a failed attempt to get change management implemented or due to a complicated system that has always existed.
    • Many systems are maintained because “that’s the way it’s always been done.”
    • Organizations don’t know where to start; they think change management is too complex a process.
    • Each group needs to follow the same procedure – groups often have their own processes, but if they don’t agree with one another, this could cause an outage.

    Educate affected stakeholders to prepare for organizational change

    An organizational change management plan should be part of your change management project.

    • Educate stakeholders about:
      • The process change (describe it in a way that the user can understand and is clear and concise).
        • IT changes will be handled in a standardized and repeatable fashion to minimize change-related incidents.
      • Who is impacted?
        • All users.
      • How are they impacted?
        • All change requests will be made using a standard form and will not be deployed until formal approval is received.
      • Change messaging.
        • How to communicate the change (benefits).
      • Learning and development – training your users on the change.
        • Develop and deliver training session on the Change Management SOP to familiarize users with this new method of handling IT change.

    Host a lunch-and-learn session

    • For the initial deployment, host a lunch-and-learn session to educate the business on the change management practice. Relevant stakeholders of affected departments should host it and cover the following topics:
    • What is change management (change management/change control)?
    • The value of change management.
    • What the Change Management SOP looks like.
    • Who is involved in the change management process (the CAB, etc.)?
    • What constitutes a pre-approved change and an emergency change?
    • An overview of the process, including how to avoid unauthorized changes.
    • Who should they contact in case of questions?

    Communicate the new process to all affected stakeholders

    Do not surprise users or support staff with changes. This will result in lost productivity and low satisfaction with IT services.

    • User groups and the business need to be given sufficient notice of an impending change.
    • This will allow them to make appropriate plans to accept the change, minimizing the impact of the change on productivity.
    • A communications plan will be documented in the RFC while the release is being built and tested.
    • It’s the responsibility of the change team to execute on the communications plan.

    Info-Tech Insight

    The success of change communication can be measured by monitoring the number of service desk tickets related to a change that was not communicated to users.

    Communication is crucial to the integration and overall implementation of your change management initiative. An effective communications plan will:

    • Gain support from management at the project proposal phase.
    • Create end-user buy-in once the program is set to launch.
    • Maintain the presence of the program throughout the business.
    • Instill ownership throughout the business from top-level management to new hires.

    Create your communications plan to anticipate challenges, remove obstacles, and ensure buy-in

    Management

    Technicians

    Business Stakeholders

    Provide separate communications to key stakeholder groups

    Why? What problems are you trying to solve?

    What? What processes will it affect (that will affect me)?

    Who? Who will be affected? Who do I go to if I have issues with the new process?

    When? When will this be happening? When will it affect me?

    How? How will these changes manifest themselves?

    Goal? What is the final goal? How will it benefit me?

    Info-Tech Insight

    Pay close attention to the medium of communication. For example, stakeholders on their feet all day would not be as receptive to an email communication compared to those who primarily work in front of a computer. Put yourself into various stakeholders’ shoes to craft a tailored communication of change management.

    4.2.1 Use a Communications Plan to Gain End User Buy-In

    Input

    • List of stakeholder groups for change management

    Output

    • Tailored communications plans for various stakeholder groups

    Materials

    Participants

    • Change Manager
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board
    • Service Desk Manager
    • Operations (optional)
    1. Using Info-Tech’s Change Management Communications Plan, identify key audiences or stakeholder groups that will be affected by the new change management practice.
    2. For each group requiring a communications plan, identify the following:
      • The benefits for that group of individuals.
      • The impact the change will have on them.
      • The best communication method(s) for them.
      • The time frame of the communication.
    3. Complete this information in a table like the one below:
    GroupBenefitsImpactMethodTimeline
    IT Standardized change process All changes must be reviewed and approved Poster campaign 6 months
    End Users Decreased wait time for changes Formal process for RFCs Lunch-and-learn sessions 3 months
    Business Reduced outages Increased involvement in planning and approvals Monthly reports 1 year
    1. Discuss the communications plan:
      • Will this plan ensure that users are given adequate opportunities to accept the changes being deployed?
      • Is the message appropriate for each audience? Is the format appropriate for each audience?
      • Does the communication include training where necessary to help users adopt any new functions/workflows being introduced?

    Download the Change Management Communications Plan

    Present your SOP to key stakeholders and obtain their approval

    Now that you have completed your Change Management SOP, the final step is to get sign-off from senior management to begin the rollout process.

    Know your audience:

    • Determine the service management stakeholders who will be included in the audience for your presentation.
    • You want your presentation to be succinct and hard hitting. Management’s time is tight and they will lose interest if you drag out the delivery.
    • Briefly speak about the need for more formal change management and emphasize the benefits of implementing a more formal process with a SOP.
    • Present your current state assessment results to provide context before presenting the SOP itself.
    • As with any other foundational activity, be prepared with some quick wins to gain executive attention.
    • Be prepared to review with both technical and less technical stakeholders.

    Info-Tech Insight

    The support of senior executive stakeholders is critical to the success of your SOP rollout. Try to wow them with project benefits and make sure they know about the risks/pain points.

    Download the Change Management Project Summary Template

    4.2.2 Create a Project Roadmap to Track Your Implementation Progress

    Input

    • List of implementation tasks

    Output

    • Roadmap and timeline for change management implementation

    Materials

    Participants

    • Change Manager
    • Members of the Change Advisory Board
    • Service Desk Manager
    • Operations (optional)
    1. Info-Tech’s Change Management Roadmap Tool helps you identify and prioritize tasks that need to be completed for the change management implementation project.
    2. Use this tool to identify each action item that will need to be completed as part of the change management initiative. Chart each action item, assign an owner, define the duration, and set a completion date.
    3. Use the resulting rocket diagram as a guide to task completion as you work toward your future state.

    Download the Change Management Roadmap Tool

    Case Study (part 4 of 4)

    Intel implemented a robust change management process.

    Industry: Technology

    Source: Daniel Grove, Intel

    Challenge

    Founded in 1968, the world’s largest microchip and semiconductor company employs over 100,000 people. Intel manufactures processors for major players in the PC market including Apple, Lenovo, HP, and Dell.

    Intel IT supports over 65,000 servers, 3.2 petabytes of data, over 70,000 PCs, and 2.6 million emails per day.

    Intel’s change management program is responsible for over 4,000 changes each week.

    Solution

    Intel had its new change management program in place and the early milestones planned, but one key challenge with any new project is communication.

    The company also needed to navigate the simplification of a previously complex process; end users could be familiar with any of the 37 different change processes or 25 different change management systems of record.

    Top-level buy-in was another concern.

    Results

    Intel first communicated the process changes by publishing the vision and strategy for the project with top management sponsorship.

    The CIO published all of the new change policies, which were supported by the Change Governance Council.

    Intel cited the reason for success as the designation of a Policy and Guidance Council – a group designed to own communication and enforcement of the new policies and processes put in place.

    Summary of Accomplishment

    Problem Solved

    You now have an outline of your new change management process. The hard work starts now for an effective implementation. Make use of the communications plan to socialize the new process with stakeholders and the roadmap to stay on track.

    Remember as you are starting your implementation to keep your documents flexible and treat them as “living documents.” You will likely need to tweak and refine the processware and templates several times to continually improve the process. Furthermore, don’t shy away from seeking feedback from your stakeholders to gain buy-in.

    Lastly, keep an eye on your progress with objective, data-driven metrics. Leverage the trends in your data to drive your decisions. Be sure to revisit the maturity assessment not only to measure and visualize your progress, but to gain insight into your next steps.

    If you would like additional support, have our analysts guide you through other phases as part of an Info-Tech workshop.

    Contact your account representative for more information.

    workshops@infotech.com

    1-888-670-8889

    Additional Support

    If you would like additional support, have our analysts guide you through other phases as part of an Info-Tech workshop.

    To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.

    Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech’s historic office in Toronto, Ontario, Canada to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.

    Contact your account representative for more information.

    workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8889

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    1.1.2 Complete a Change Management Maturity Assessment

    Run through the change management maturity assessment with tailored commentary for each action item outlining context and best practices.

    2.2.1 Plot the Process for a Normal Change

    Build a normal change process using Info-Tech’s Change Management Process Library template with an analyst helping you to right size the process for your organization.

    Related Info-Tech Research

    Standardize the Service Desk

    Improve customer service by driving consistency in your support approach and meeting SLAs.

    Stabilize Release and Deployment Management

    Maintain both speed and control while improving the quality of deployments and releases within the infrastructure team.

    Incident and Problem Management

    Don’t let persistent problems govern your department.

    Select Bibliography

    AXELOS Limited. ITIL Foundation: ITIL 4th edition. TSO, 2019, pp. 118–120.

    Behr, Kevin and George Spafford. The Visible Ops Handbook: Implementing ITIL in 4 Practical and Auditable Steps. IT Revolution Press. 2013.

    BMC. “ITIL Change Management.” BMC Software Canada, 22 December 2016.

    Brown, Vance. “Change Management: The Greatest ROI of ITIL.” Cherwell Service Management.

    Cisco. “Change Management: Best Practices.” Cisco, 10 March 2008.

    Grove, Daniel. “Case Study ITIL Change Management Intel Corporation.” PowerShow, 2005.

    ISACA. “COBIT 5: Enabling Processes.” ISACA, 2012.

    Jantti, M. and M. Kainulainen. “Exploring an IT Service Change Management Process: A Case Study.” ICDS 2011: The Fifth International Conference on Digital Society, 23 Feb. 2011.

    Murphy, Vawns. “How to Assess Changes.” The ITSM Review, 29 Jan. 2016.

    Nyo, Isabel. “Best Practices for Change Management in the Age of DevOps.” Atlassian Engineering, 12 May 2021.

    Phillips, Katherine W., Katie A. Liljenquist, and Margaret A. Neale. “Better Decisions Through Diversity.” Kellogg Insight, 1 Oct. 2010.

    Pink Elephant. “Best Practices for Change Management.” Pink Elephant, 2005.

    Sharwood, Simon. “Google broke its own cloud by doing two updates at once.” The Register, 24 Aug. 2016.

    SolarWinds. “How to Eliminate the No: 1 Cause of Network Downtime.” SolarWinds Tech Tips, 25 Apr. 2014.

    The Stationery Office. “ITIL Service Transition: 2011.” The Stationary Office, 29 July 2011.

    UCISA. “ITIL – A Guide to Change Management.” UCISA.

    Zander, Jason. “Final Root Cause Analysis and Improvement Areas: Nov 18 Azure Storage Service Interruption.” Microsoft Azure: Blog and Updates, 17 Dec. 2014.

    Appendix I: Expedited Changes

    Employ the expedited change to promote process adherence

    In many organizations, there are changes which may not fit into the three prescribed categories. The reason behind why the expedited category may be needed generally falls between two possibilities:

    1. External drivers dictate changes via mandates which may not fall within the normal change cycle. A CIO, judge, state/provincial mandate, or request from shared services pushes a change that does not fall within a normal change cycle. However, there is no imminent outage (therefore it is not an emergency). In this case, an expedited change can proceed. Communicate to the change requester that IT and the change build team will still do their best to implement the change without issue, but any extra risk of implementing this expedited change (compared to an normal change) will be absorbed by the change requester.
    2. The change requester did not prepare for the change adequately. This is common if a new change process is being established (and stakeholders are still adapting to the process). Change requesters or the change build team may request the change to be done by a certain date that does not fall within the normal change cycle, or they simply did not give the CAB enough time to vet the change. In this case, you may use the expedited category as a metric (or a “Hall of Shame” example). If you identify a department or individual that frequently request expedited changes, use the expedited category as a means to educate them about the normal change to discourage the behavior moving forward.

    Two possible ways to build an expedited change category”

    1. Build the category similar to an emergency change. In this case, one difference would be the time allotted to fully obtain authorization of the change from the E-CAB and business owner before implementing the change (as opposed to the emergency change workflow).
    2. Have the expedited change reflect the normal change workflow. In this case, all the same steps of the normal change workflow are followed except for expedited timelines between processes. This may include holding an impromptu CAB meeting to authorize the change.

    Example process: Expedited Change Process

    The image is a flowchart, showing the process for Expedited Change.

    For the full process, refer to the Change Management Process Library.

    Appendix II: Optimize IT Change Management in a DevOps Environment

    Change Management cannot be ignored because you are DevOps or Agile

    But it can be right-sized.

    The core tenets of change management still apply no matter the type of development environment an organization has. Changes in any environment carry risk of degrading functionality, and must therefore be vetted. However, the amount of work and rigor put into different stages of the change life cycle can be altered depending on the maturity of the development workflows. The following are several stage gates for change management that MUST be considered if you are a DevOps or Agile shop:

    • Intake assessment (separation of changes from projects, service requests, operational tasks)
      • Within a DevOps or Agile environment, many of the application changes will come directly from the SDLC and projects going live. It does not mean a change must go through CAB, but leveraging the pre-approved category allows for an organization to stick to development lifecycles without being heavily bogged down by change bureaucracy.
    • Technical review
      • Leveraging automation, release contingencies, and the current SDLC documentation to decrease change risk allows for various changes to be designated as pre-approved.
    • Authorization
      • Define the authorization and dependencies of a change early in the lifecycle to gain authorization and necessary signoffs.
    • Documentation/communication
      • Documentation and communication are post-implementation activities that cannot be ignored. If documentation is required throughout the SDLC, then design the RFC to point to the correct documentation instead of duplicating information.

    "Understand that process is hard and finding a solution that fits every need can be tricky. With this change management process we do not try to solve every corner case so much as create a framework by which best judgement can be used to ensure maximum availability of our platforms and services while still complying with our regulatory requirements and making positive changes that will delight our customers.“ -IT Director, Information Cybersecurity Organization

    Five principals for implementing change in DevOps

    Follow these best practices to make sure your requirements are solid:

    People

    The core differences between an Agile or DevOps transition and a traditional approach are the restructuring and the team behind it. As a result, the stakeholders of change management must be onboard for the process to work. This is the most difficult problem to solve if it’s an issue, but open avenues of feedback for a process build is a start.

    DevOps Lifecycles

    • Plan the dev lifecycle so people can’t skirt it. Ensure the process has automated checks so that it’s more work to skirt the system than it is to follow it. Make the right process the process of least resistance.
    • Plan changes from the start to ensure that cross-dependencies are identified early and that the proposed implementation date is deconflicted and visible to other change requesters and change stakeholders.

    Automation

    Automation comes in many forms and is well documented in many development workflows. Having automated signoffs for QA/security checks and stakeholders/cross dependency owner sign offs may not fully replace the CAB but can ease the burden on discussions before implementation.

    Contingencies

    Canary releases, phased releases, dark releases, and toggles are all options you can employ to reduce risk during a release. Furthermore, building in contingencies to the test/rollback plan decreases the risk of the change by decreasing the factor of likelihood.

    Continually Improve

    Building change from the ground up doesn’t meant the process has to be fully fledged before launch. Iterative improvements are possible before achieving an optimal state. Having the proper metrics on the pain points and bottlenecks in the process can identify areas for automation and improvement.

    Increasing the proportion of pre-approved changes

    Leverage the traditional change infrastructure to deploy changes quickly while keeping your risk low.

    • To designate a change as a pre-approved change it must have a low risk rating (based on impact and likelihood). Fortunately, many of the changes within the Agile framework are designed to be small and lower risk (at least within application development). Putting in the work ahead of time to document these changes, template RFCs, and document the dependencies for various changes allows for a shift in the proportion of pre-approved changes.
    • The designation of pre-approved changes is an ongoing process. This is not an overnight initiative. Measure the proportion of changes by category as a metric, setting goals and interim goals to shift the change proportion to a desired ratio.

    The image is a bar graph, with each bar having 3 colour-coded sections: Emergency, Normal, and Pre-Approved. The first bar is before, where the largest change category is Normal. The second bar is after, and the largest change category is Pre-Approved.

    Turn your CAB into a virtual one

    • The CAB does not have to fully disappear in a DevOps environment. If the SDLC is built in a way that authorizes changes through peer reviews and automated checks, by the time it’s deployed, the job of the CAB should have already been completed. Then the authorization stage-gate (traditionally, the CAB) shifts to earlier in the process, reducing the need for an actual CAB meeting. However, the change must still be communicated and documented, even if it’s a pre-approved change.
    • As the proportion of changes shifts from a high degree of normal changes to a high degree of pre-approved changes, the need for CAB meetings should decrease even further. As an end-state, you may reserve actual CAB meetings for high-profile changes (as defined by risk).
    • Lastly, change management does not disappear as a process. Periodic reviews of change management metrics and the pre-approved change list must still be completed.

    Modernize Communications and Collaboration Infrastructure

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}306|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.4/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $68,332 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 22 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Voice & Video Management
    • Parent Category Link: /voice-video-management
    • Organizations are losing productivity from managing the limitations of yesterday’s technology. The business is changing and the current communications solution no longer adequately connects end users.
    • Old communications technology, including legacy telephony systems, disjointed messaging and communication or collaboration mediums, and unintuitive video conferencing, deteriorates the ability of users to work together in a productive manner.
    • You need a solution that meets budgetary requirements and improves internal and external communication, productivity, and the ability to work together.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Project scope and assessment will take more time than you initially anticipate. Poorly defined technical requirements can result in failure to meet the needs of the business. Defining project scope and assessing the existing solution is 60% of project time. Being thorough here will make the difference moving forward.
    • Even when the project is about modernizing technology, it’s not really about the technology. The requirements of your people and the processes you want to maintain or reform should be the influential factors in your decisions on technology.
    • Gaining business buy-in can be difficult for projects that the business doesn’t equate with directly driving revenue. Ensure your IT team communicates with the business throughout the process and establishes business requirements. Framing conversations in a “business first, IT second” way is crucial to speaking in a language the business will understand.

    Impact and Result

    • Define a comprehensive set of requirements (across people, process, and technology) at the start of the project. Communication solutions are long-term commitments and mistakes in planning will be amplified during implementation.
    • Analyze the pros and cons of each deployment option and identify a communications solution that balances your budget and communications objectives and requirements.
    • Create an effective RFP by outlining your specific business and technical needs and goals.
    • Make the case for your communications infrastructure modernization project and be prepared to support it.

    Modernize Communications and Collaboration Infrastructure Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should modernize your communications and collaboration infrastructure, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Assess communications infrastructure

    Evaluate the infrastructure requirements and the ability to undergo modernization from legacy technology.

    • Modernize Communications and Collaboration Infrastructure – Phase 1: Assess Communications Infrastructure
    • Communications Infrastructure Roadmap Tool
    • Team Skills Inventory Tool
    • MACD Workflow Mapping Template - Visio
    • MACD Workflow Mapping Template - PDF

    2. Define the target state

    Build and document a formal set of business requirements using Info-Tech's pre-populated template after identifying stakeholders, aligning business and user needs, and evaluating deployment options.

    • Modernize Communications and Collaboration Infrastructure – Phase 2: Define the Target State
    • Stakeholder Engagement Workbook
    • Communications Infrastructure Stakeholder Focus Group Guide
    • IP Telephony and UC End-User Survey Questions
    • Enterprise Communication and Collaboration System Business Requirements Document
    • Communications TCO-ROI Comparison Calculator

    3. Advance the project

    Draft an RFP for a UC solution and gain project approval using Info-Tech’s executive presentation deck.

    • Modernize Communications and Collaboration Infrastructure – Phase 3: Advance the Project
    • Unified Communications Solution RFP Template
    • Modernize Communications Infrastructure Executive Presentation
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Modernize Communications and Collaboration Infrastructure

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Assess the Communications Infrastructure

    The Purpose

    Identify pain points.

    Build a skills inventory.

    Define and rationalize template configuration needs.

    Define standard service requests and map workflow.

    Discuss/examine site type(s) and existing technology.

    Determine network state and readiness.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    IT skills & process understanding.

    Documentation reflecting communications infrastructure.

    Reviewed network readiness.

    Completed current state analysis.

    Activities

    1.1 Build a skills inventory.

    1.2 Document move, add, change, delete (MACD) processes.

    1.3 List relevant communications and collaboration technologies.

    1.4 Review network readiness checklist.

    Outputs

    Clearly documented understanding of available skills

    Documented process maps

    Complete list of relevant communications and collaboration technologies

    Completed readiness checklist

    2 Learn and Evaluate Options to Define the Future

    The Purpose

    Hold focus group meeting.

    Define business needs and goals.

    Define solution options.

    Evaluate options.

    Discuss business value and readiness for each option.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Completed value and readiness assessment.

    Current targets for service and deployment models.

    Activities

    2.1 Conduct internal focus group.

    2.2 Align business needs and goals.

    2.3 Evaluate deployment options.

    Outputs

    Understanding of user needs, wants, and satisfaction with current solution

    Assessment of business needs and goals

    Understanding of potential future-state solution options

    3 Identify and Close the Gaps

    The Purpose

    Identify gaps.

    Examine and evaluate ways to remedy gaps.

    Determine specific business requirements and introduce draft of business requirements document.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Completed description of future state.

    Identification of gaps.

    Identification of key business requirements.

    Activities

    3.1 Identify gaps and brainstorm gap remedies.

    3.2 Complete business requirements document.

    Outputs

    Well-defined gaps and remedies

    List of specific business requirements

    4 Build the Roadmap

    The Purpose

    Introduce Unified Communications Solution RFP Template.

    Develop statement of work (SOW).

    Document technical requirements.

    Complete cost-benefit analysis.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Unified Communications RFP.

    Documented technical requirements.

    Activities

    4.1 Draft RFP (SOW, tech requirements, etc.).

    4.2 Conduct cost-benefit analysis.

    Outputs

    Ready to release RFP

    Completed cost-benefit analysis

    Don’t Allow Software Licensing to Derail Your M&A

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}135|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Vendor Management
    • Parent Category Link: /vendor-management
    • Assuming that all parties are compliant in their licensing is a risky proposition. Most organizations are deficient in some manner of licensing. Know where those gaps are before finalizing M&A activity and have a plan in place to mitigate them right away.
    • Vendors will target companies that have undergone recent M&A activity with an audit. Vendors know that the many moving parts of M&A activity often result in license shortfall, and they may look to capitalize during the transition with audit revenue.
    • New organizational structure can offer new licensing opportunities. Take advantage of the increased volume discounting, negotiation leverage, and consolidation opportunities afforded by a merger or acquisition.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • To mitigate risks and create accurate cost estimates, create a contingency fund to compensate for unavailability of information.
    • Gathering and analyzing information is an iterative process that is ongoing throughout due diligence. Update your assumptions, risks, and budget as you obtain new information.
    • Communication with the M&A team and business process owners should be constant throughout due diligence. IT integration does not exist in isolation.

    Impact and Result

    • CIOs must be part of the conversation during the exploration/due diligence phase before the deal is closed to examine licensing compliance and software costs that could have a direct result on the valuation of the new organization.
    • Both organizations must conduct thorough due diligence (such as internal SAM audits), analyze the information, and define critical assumptions to create a strategy for the resultant IT enterprise.
    • The IT team is involved in integration, synergy realization, and cost considerations that the business often does not consider or take into account with respect to IT. License transfer, assignability, use, and geographic rights all come into play and can be overlooked.

    Don’t Allow Software Licensing to Derail Your M&A Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you shouldn’t allow software licensing to derail your M&A deal, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Understand the M&A process with respect to software licensing

    Grasp the key pain points of software licensing and the effects it has on an M&A. Review the benefits of early IT involvement and identify IT’s capabilities.

    • Don’t Allow Software Licensing to Derail Your M&A – Phase 1: M&A Overview
    • M&A Software Asset Maturity Assessment

    2. Perform due diligence

    Understand the various steps and process when conducting due diligence. Request information and assess risks, make assumptions, and budget costs.

    • Don’t Allow Software Licensing to Derail Your M&A – Phase 2: Due Diligence
    • License Inventory
    • IT Due Diligence Report
    • M&A Software Asset RACI Template

    3. Prepare for integration

    Take a deeper dive into the application portfolios and vendor contracts of both organizations. Review integration strategies and design the end-state of the resultant organization.

    • Don’t Allow Software Licensing to Derail Your M&A – Phase 3: Pre-Integration Planning
    • Effective Licensing Position Tool
    • IT Integration Roadmap Tool

    4. Execute on the integration plan

    Review initiatives being undertaken to ensure successful integration execution. Discuss long-term goals and how to communicate with vendors to avoid licensing audits.

    • Don’t Allow Software Licensing to Derail Your M&A – Phase 4: Integration Execution
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Don’t Allow Software Licensing to Derail Your M&A

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 M&A Overview

    The Purpose

    Identify the goals and objectives the business has for the M&A.

    Understand cultural and organizational structure challenges and red flags.

    Identify SAM/licensing challenges and red flags.

    Conduct maturity assessment.

    Clarify stakeholder responsibilities.

    Build and structure the M&A team.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    The capabilities required to successfully examine software assets and licensing during the M&A transaction.

    M&A business goals and objectives identified.

    IT M&A team selected.

    Severity of SAM challenges and red flags examined.

    Activities

    1.1 Document pain points from previous experience.

    1.2 Identify IT opportunities during M&A.

    Outputs

    M&A Software Asset Maturity Assessment

    2 Due Diligence

    The Purpose

    Take a structured due diligence approach that properly evaluates the current state of the organization.

    Review M&A license inventory and use top five vendors as example sets.

    Identify data capture and reporting methods/tools.

    Scheduling challenges.

    Scope level of effort and priority list.

    Common M&A pressures (internal/external).

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A clear understanding of the steps that are involved in the due diligence process.

    Recognition of the various areas from which information will need to be collected.

    Licensing pitfalls and compliance risks to be examined.

    Knowledge of terms and conditions that will limit ability in pre-integration planning.

    Activities

    2.1 Identify IT capabilities for an M&A.

    2.2 Create your due diligence team and assign accountability.

    2.3 Use Info-Tech’s IT Due Diligence Report Template to track key elements.

    2.4 Document assumptions to back up cost estimates and risk.

    Outputs

    M&A Software Asset RACI Template

    IT Due Diligence Report

    3 Pre-Integration Planning

    The Purpose

    Review and map legal operating entity structure for the resultant organization.

    Examine impact on licensing scenarios for top five vendors.

    Identify alternative paths and solutions.

    Complete license impact for top five vendors.

    Brainstorm action plan to mitigate negative impacts.

    Discuss and explore the scalable process for second level agreements.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Identification of the ideal post-M&A application portfolio and licensing structures.

    Recognition of the key considerations when determining the appropriate combination of IT integration strategies.

    Design of vendor contracts for the resultant enterprise.

    Recognition of how to create an IT integration budget.

    Activities

    3.1 Work with the senior management team to review how the new organization will operate.

    3.2 Document the strategic goals and objectives of IT’s integration program.

    3.3 Interview business leaders to understand how they envision their business units.

    3.4 Perform internal SAM audit.

    3.5 Create a library of all IT processes in the target organization as well as your own.

    3.6 Examine staff using two dimensions: competency and capacity.

    3.7 Design the end-state.

    3.8 Communicate your detailed pre-integration roadmap with senior leadership and obtain sign-off.

    Outputs

    IT Integration Roadmap Tool

    Effective License Position

    4 Manage Post-M&A Activities

    The Purpose

    Finalize path forward for top five vendors based on M&A license impact.

    Disclose findings and financial impact estimate to management.

    Determine methods for second level agreements to be managed.

    Provide listing of specific recommendations for top five list.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Initiatives generated and executed upon to achieve the technology end-state of each IT domain.

    Vendor audits avoided.

    Contracts amended and vendors spoken to.

    Communication with management on achievable synergies and quick wins.

    Activities

    4.1 Identify initiatives necessary to realize the application end-state.

    4.2 Identify initiatives necessary to realize the end-state of IT processes.

    4.3 Identify initiatives necessary to realize the end-state of IT staffing.

    4.4 Prioritize initiatives based on ease of implementation and overall business impact.

    4.5 Manage vendor relations.

    Outputs

    IT Integration Roadmap Tool

    Modernize Your Microsoft Licensing for the Cloud Era

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}304|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.1/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $102,414 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 10 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Licensing
    • Parent Category Link: /licensing
    • Microsoft licensing is complicated. Often, the same software can be licensed a number of ways. It’s difficult to know which edition and licensing model is best.
    • Licensing and features often change with the release of new software versions, compounding the problem by making it difficult to stay current.
    • In tough economic times, IT is asked to reduce capital and operating expenses wherever possible. As one of the top five expense items in most enterprise software budgets, Microsoft licensing is a primary target for cost reduction.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Focus on needs first. Conduct a thorough needs assessment and document the results. Well-documented needs will be your best asset in navigating Microsoft licensing and negotiating your agreement.
    • Beware the bundle. Be aware when purchasing the M365 suite that there is no way out. Negotiating a low price is critical, as all leverage swings to Microsoft once it is on your agreement.
    • If the cloud doesn’t fit, be ready to pay up or start making room. Microsoft has drastically reduced discounting for on-premises products, support has been reduced, and product rights have been limited. If you are planning to remain on premises, be prepared to pay up.

    Impact and Result

    • Understand what your organization needs and what your business requirements are. It’s always easier to purchase more later than try to reduce your spend.
    • Complete cost calculations carefully, as the cloud might end up costing significantly more for the desired feature set. However, in some scenarios, it may be more cost efficient for organizations to license in the cloud.
    • If there are significant barriers to cloud adoption, discuss and document them. You’ll need this documentation in three years when it’s time to renew your agreement.

    Modernize Your Microsoft Licensing for the Cloud Era Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Modernize Your Microsoft Licensing Deck – A deck to help you build a strategy for your Microsoft licensing renewal.

    This storyboard will help you build a strategy for your Microsoft licensing renewal from conducting a thorough needs assessment to examining your licensing position, evaluating Microsoft's licensing options, and negotiations.

    • Modernize Your Microsoft Licensing for the Cloud Era – Phases 1-4

    2. Microsoft Cloud Products Cost Modeler – A tool to model estimated costs for Microsoft's cloud products.

    The Microsoft Cloud Products Cost Modeler will provide a rough estimate of what you can expect to pay for Office 365 or Dynamics CRM licensing, before you enter into negotiations. This is not your final cost, but it will give you an idea.

    • Microsoft Cloud Products Cost Modeler

    3. Microsoft Licensing Purchase Reference Guide - A template to capture licensing stakeholder information, proposed changes to licensing, and negotiation items.

    The Microsoft Licensing Purchase Reference Guide can be used throughout the process of licensing review: from initial meetings to discuss compliance state and planned purchases, to negotiation meetings with resellers. Use it in conjunction with Info-Tech's Microsoft Licensing Effective License Position Template.

    • Microsoft Licensing Purchase Reference Guide

    4. Negotiation Timeline for Microsoft – A template to navigate your negotiations with Microsoft.

    This tool will help you plot out your negotiation timeline, depending on where you are in your contract negotiation process.

  • 6-12 months
  • Less than 3 months
    • Negotiation Timeline for Microsoft – Visio
    • Negotiation Timeline for Microsoft – PDF

    5. Effective Licensing Position Tool – A template to help you create an effective licensing position and determine your compliance position.

    This template helps organizations to determine the difference between the number of software licenses they own and the number of software copies deployed. This is known as the organization’s effective license position (ELP).

    • Effective Licensing Position Tool
    [infographic]

    Exploit Disruptive Infrastructure Technology

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}298|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Disruptive & Emerging Technologies
    • Parent Category Link: /disruptive-emerging-technologies
    • New technology can hit like a meteor. Not only disruptive to IT, technology provides opportunities for organization-wide advantage.
    • Your role is endangered. If you don’t prepare for the most disruptive technologies, you could be overshadowed. Don’t let the Chief Marketing Officer (CMO) set the technological innovation agenda
    • Predicting the future isn’t easy. Most IT leaders fail to realize how quickly technology increases in capability. Even for the tech savvy, predicting which specific technologies will become disruptive is difficult.
    • Communication is difficult when the sky is falling. Even forward-looking IT leaders struggle with convincing others to devote time and resources to monitoring technologies with a formal process.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Establish the core working group, select a leader, and select a group of visionaries to help brainstorm emerging technologies.
    • Brainstorm about creating a better future, begin brainstorming an initial longlist.
    • Train the group to think like futurists.
    • Evaluate the shortlist.
    • Define your PoC list and schedule.
    • Finalize, present the plan to stakeholders and repeat.

    Impact and Result

    • Create a disruptive technology working group.
    • Produce a longlist of disruptive technologies.
    • Evaluate the longlist to produce a shortlist of disruptive technologies.
    • Develop a plan for a proof-of-concept project for each shortlisted technology.

    Exploit Disruptive Infrastructure Technology Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Exploit Disruptive Infrastructure Technology – A guide to help IT leaders make the most of disruptive impacts.

    As a CIO, there is a need to move beyond day-to-day technology management with an ever-increasing need to forecast technology impacts. Not just from a technical perspective but to map out the technical understandings aligned to potential business impacts and improvements. Technology transformation and innovation is moving more quickly than ever before and as an innovation champion, the CIO or CTO should have foresight in specific technologies with the understanding of how the company could be disrupted in the near future.

    • Exploit Disruptive Infrastructure Technology – Phases 1-3

    2. Disruptive Technology Exploitation Plan Template – A guide to develop the plan for exploiting disruptive technology.

    The Disruptive Technology Exploitation Plan Template acts as an implementation plan for developing a long-term strategy for monitoring and implementing disruptive technologies.

    • Disruptive Technology Exploitation Plan Template

    3. Disruptive Technology Look to the Past Tool – A tool to keep track of the missed technology disruption from previous opportunities.

    The Disruptive Technology Look to the Past Tool will assist you to collect reasonability test notes when evaluating potential disruptive technologies.

    • Disruptive Technology Look to the Past Tool

    4. Disruptive Technology Research Database Tool – A tool to keep track of the research conducted by members of the working group.

    The Disruptive Technology Research Database Tool will help you to keep track of the independent research that is conducted by members of the disruptive technology exploitation working group.

    • Disruptive Technology Research Database Tool

    5. Disruptive Technology Shortlisting Tool

    The Disruptive Technology Shortlisting Tool will help you to codify the results of the disruptive technology working group's longlist winnowing process.

    • Disruptive Technology Shortlisting Tool

    6. Disruptive Technology Value-Readiness and SWOT Analysis Tool – A tool to systematize notional evaluations of the value and readiness of potential disruptive technologies.

    The Disruptive Technology Value Readiness & SWOT Analysis Tool will assist you to systematize notional evaluations of the value and readiness of potential disruptive technologies.

    • Disruptive Technology Value-Readiness and SWOT Analysis Tool

    7. Proof of Concept Template – A handbook to serve as a reference when deciding how to proceed with your proposed solution.

    The Proof of Concept Template will guide you through the creation of a minimum-viable proof-of-concept project.

    • Proof of Concept Template

    8. Disruptive Technology Executive Presentation Template – A template to help you create a brief progress report presentation summarizing your project and program progress.

    The Disruptive Technology Executive Presentation Template will assist you to present an overview of the disruptive technology process, outlining the value to your company.

    • Disruptive Technology Executive Presentation Template

    Infographic

    Workshop: Exploit Disruptive Infrastructure Technology

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Pre-work: Establish the Disruptive Tech Process

    The Purpose

    Discuss the general overview of the disruptive technology exploitation process.

    Develop an initial disruptive technology exploitation plan.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Stakeholders are on board, the project’s goals are outlined, and the working group is selected.

    Activities

    1.1 Get execs and stakeholders on board.

    1.2 Review the process of analyzing disruptive tech.

    1.3 Select members for the working group.

    1.4 Choose a schedule and time commitment.

    1.5 Select a group of visionaries.

    Outputs

    Initialized disruptive tech exploitation plan

    Meeting agenda, schedule, and participants

    2 Hold the Initial Meeting

    The Purpose

    Understand how disruption will affect the organization, and develop an initial list of technologies to explore.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Knowledge of how to think like a futurist.

    Understanding of organizational processes vulnerable to disruption.

    Outline of potentially disruptive technologies.

    Activities

    2.1 Start the meeting with introductions.

    2.2 Train the group to think like futurists.

    2.3 Brainstorm about disruptive processes.

    2.4 Brainstorm a longlist.

    2.5 Research and brainstorm separate longlists.

    Outputs

    List of disruptive organizational processes

    Initial longlist of disruptive tech

    3 Create a Longlist and Assess Shortlist

    The Purpose

    Evaluate the specific value of longlisted technologies to the organization.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Defined list of the disruptive technologies worth escalating to the proof of concept stage.

    Activities

    3.1 Converge the longlists developed by the team.

    3.2 Narrow the longlist to a shortlist.

    3.3 Assess readiness and value.

    3.4 Perform a SWOT analysis.

    Outputs

    Finalized longlist of disruptive tech

    Shortlist of disruptive tech

    Value-readiness analysis

    SWOT analysis

    Candidate(s) for proof of concept charter

    4 Create an Action Plan

    The Purpose

    Understand how the technologies in question will impact the organization.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Understanding of the specific effects of the new technology on the business processes it is intended to disrupt.

    Business case for the proof-of-concept project.

    Activities

    4.1 Build a problem canvas.

    4.2 Identify affected business units.

    4.3 Outline and map the business processes likely to be disrupted.

    4.4 Map disrupted business processes.

    4.5 Recognize how the new technology will impact business processes.

    4.6 Make the case.

    Outputs

    Problem canvas

    Map of business processes: current state

    Map of disrupted business processes

    Business case for each technology

    Further reading

    Analyst Perspective

    The key is in anticipation.

    “We all encounter unexpected changes and our responses are often determined by how we perceive and understand those changes. We react according to the unexpected occurrence. Business organizations are no different.

    When a company faces a major technology disruption in its markets – one that could fundamentally change the business or impact its processes and technology – the way its management perceive and understand the disruption influences how they describe and plan for it. In other words, the way management sets the context of a disruption – the way they frame it – shapes the strategy they adopt. Technology leaders can vastly influence business strategy by adopting a proactive approach to understanding disruptive and innovative technologies by simply adopting a process to review and evaluate technology impacts to the company’s lines of business.”

    This is a picture of Troy Cheeseman

    Troy Cheeseman
    Practice Lead, Infrastructure & Operations Research
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    • New technology can hit like a meteor. Not only disruptive to IT, technology provides opportunities for organization-wide advantage.
    • Your role is endangered. If you don’t prepare for the most disruptive technologies, you could be overshadowed. Don’t let the chief marketing officer (CMO) set the technological innovation agenda.

    Common Obstacles

    • Predicting the future isn’t easy. Most IT leaders fail to realize how quickly technology increases in capability. Even for the tech savvy, predicting which specific technologies will become disruptive is difficult.
    • Communication is difficult when the sky is falling. Even forward-looking IT leaders struggle with convincing others to devote time and resources to monitoring technologies with a formal process.

    Info-Tech’s Approach

    • Identify, resolve, and evaluate. Use an annual process as described in this blueprint: a formal evaluation of new technology that turns analysis into action.
    • Lead the analysis from IT. Establish a team to carry out the annual process as a cure for the causes of “airline magazine syndrome” and to prevent it from happening in the future.
    • Train your team on the patterns of progress, track technology over time in a central database, and read Info-Tech’s analysis of upcoming technology.
    • Create your KPIs. Establish your success indicators to create measurable value when presenting to your executive.
    • Produce a comprehensive proof-of-concept plan that will allow your company to minimize risk and maximize reward when engaging with new technology.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Proactively monitoring, evaluating, and exploiting disruptive tech isn’t optional.
    This will protect your role, IT’s role, and the future of the organization.

    A diverse working group maximizes the insight brought to bear.
    An IT background is not a prerequisite.

    The best technology is only the best when it brings immediate value.
    Good technology might not be ready; ready technology might not be good.

    Review

    We help IT leaders make the most of disruptive impacts.

    This research is designed for:

    Target Audience: CIO, CTO, Head of Infrastructure

    This research will help you:

    • Develop a process for anticipating, analyzing, and exploiting disruptive technology.
    • Communicate the business case for investing in disruptive technology.
    • Categorize emerging technologies to decide what to do with them.
    • Develop a plan for taking action to exploit the technology that will most affect your organization.

    Problem statement:

    As a CIO, there is a need to move beyond day-to-day technology management with an ever-increasing need to forecast technology impacts. Not just from a technical perspective but to map out the technical understandings aligned to potential business impacts and improvements. Technology transformation and innovation is moving more quickly than ever before and as an innovation champion, the CIO or CTO should have foresight in specific technologies with the understanding of how the company could be disrupted in the near future. Foresight + Current Technology + Business Understanding = Understanding the Business Disruption. This should be a repeatable process, not an exception or reactionary response.

    Insight Summary

    Establish the core working group, select a leader, and select a group of visionaries to help brainstorm emerging technologies.

    The right team matters. A core working group will keep focus through the process and a leader will keep everyone accountable. Visionaries are out-of-the-box thinkers and once they understand how to think like a "futurists," they will drive the longlist and shortlist actions.

    Train the group to think like futurists

    To keep up with exponential technology growth you need to take a multi-threaded approach.

    Brainstorm about creating a better future; begin brainstorming an initial longlist

    Establish the longlist. The longlist helps create a holistic view of most technologies that could impact the business. Assigning values and quadrant scoring will shortlist the options and focus your PoC option.

    Converge everyone’s longlists

    Long to short...that's the short of it. Using SWOT, value readiness, and quadrant mapping review sessions will focus the longlist, creating a shortlist of potential POC candidates to review and consider.

    Evaluate the shortlist

    There is no such thing as a risk-free endeavor. Use a systematic process to ensure that the risks your organization takes have the potential to produce significant rewards.

    Define your PoC list and schedule

    Don’t be afraid to fail! Inevitably, some proof-of-concept projects will not benefit the organization. The projects that are successful will more than cover the costs of the failed projects. Roll out small scale and minimize losses.

    Finalize, present the plan to stakeholders, and repeat!

    Don't forget the C-suite. Effectively communicate and present the working group’s finding with a well-defined and succinct presentation. Start the process again!

    This is a screenshot of the Thought map for Exploit disruptive infrastructure Technology.
    1. Identify
      • Establish the core working group and select a leader; select a group of visionaries
      • Train the group to think like futurists
      • Hold your initial meeting
    2. Resolve
    • Create and winnow a longlist
    • Assess and create the shortlist
  • Evaluate
    • Create process maps
    • Develop proof of concept charter
  • The Key Is in Anticipation!

    Use Info-Tech’s approach for analyzing disruptive technology in your own disruptive tech working group

    Phase 1: Identify Phase 2: Resolve Phase 3: Evaluate

    Phase Steps

    1. Establish the disruptive technology working group
    2. Think like a futurist (Training)
    3. Hold initial meeting or create an agenda for the meeting
    1. Create and winnow a longlist
    2. Assess shortlist
    1. Create process maps
    2. Develop proof of concept charter

    Phase Outcomes

    • Establish a team of subject matter experts that will evaluate new, emerging, and potentially disruptive technologies.
    • Establish a process for including visionaries from outside of the working group who will provide insight and direction.
    • Introduce the core working group members.
    • Gain a better understanding of how technology advances.
    • Brainstorm a list of organizational processes.
    • Brainstorm an initial longlist.
    • Finalized longlist
    • Finalized shortlist
    • Initial analysis of each technology on the shortlist
    • Finalized shortlist
    • Initial analysis of each technology on the shortlist
    • Business process maps before and after disruption
    • Proof of concept charter
    • Key performance indicators
    • Estimation of required resources
    • Executive presentation

    Four key challenges make it essential for you to become a champion for exploiting disruptive technology

    1. New technology can hit like a meteor. It doesn’t only disrupt IT; technology provides opportunities for organization-wide advantage.
    2. Your role is endangered. If you don’t prepare for the most disruptive technologies, you could be overshadowed. Don’t let the CMO rule technological innovation.
    3. Predicting the future isn’t easy. Most IT leaders fail to realize how quickly technology increases in capability. Even for the tech savvy, predicting which specific technologies will become disruptive is difficult.
    4. Communication is difficult when the sky is falling. Even forward-looking IT leaders struggle with convincing others to devote time and resources to monitoring emerging technologies with a formal process.

    “Look, you have never had this amount of opportunity for innovation. Don’t forget to capitalize on it. If you do not capitalize on it, you will go the way of the dinosaur.”
    – Dave Evans, Co-Founder and CTO, Stringify

    Technology can hit like a meteor

    “ By 2025:

    • 38.6 billion smart devices will be collecting, analyzing, and sharing data.
    • The web hosting services market is to reach $77.8 billion in 2025.
    • 70% of all tech spending is expected to go for cloud solutions.
    • There are 1.35 million tech startups.
    • Global AI market is expected to reach $89.8 billion.”

    – Nick Gabov

    IT Disruption

    Technology disrupts IT by:

    • Affecting the infrastructure and applications that IT needs to use internally.
    • Affecting the technology of end users that IT needs to support and deploy, especially for technologies with a consumer focus.
    • Allowing IT to run more efficiently and to increase the efficiency of other business units.
    • Example: The rise of the smartphone required many organizations to rethink endpoint devices.

    Business Disruption

    Technology disrupts the business by:

    • Affecting the viability of the business.
    • Affecting the business’ standing in relation to competitors that better deal with disruptive technology.
    • Affecting efficiency and business strategy. IT should have a role in technology-related business decisions.
    • Example: BlackBerry failed to anticipate the rise of the apps ecosystem. The company struggled as it was unable to react with competitive products.

    Senior IT leaders are expected to predict disruptions to IT and the business, while tending to today’s needs

    You are expected to be both a firefighter and a forecaster

    • Anticipating upcoming disruptions is part of your job, and you will be blamed if you fail to anticipate future business disruptions because you are focusing on the present.
    • However, keeping IT running smoothly is also part of your job, and you will be blamed if today’s IT environment breaks down because you are focusing on the future.

    You’re caught between the present and the future

    • You don’t have a process that anticipates future disruptions but runs alongside and integrates with operations in the present.
    • You can’t do it alone. Tending to both the present and the future will require a team that can help you keep the process running.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Be prepared when disruptions start coming down, even though it isn’t easy. Use this research to reduce the effort to a simple process that can be performed alongside everyday firefighting.

    Make disruptive tech analysis and exploitation part of your innovation agenda

    A scatter plot graph is depicted, plotting IT Innovative Leadership (X axis), and Satisfaction with IT(Y axis). IT innovative leadership explains 75% of variation in satisfaction with IT

    Organizations without high satisfaction with IT innovation leadership are only 20% likely to be highly satisfied with IT

    “You rarely see a real-world correlation of .86!”
    – Mike Battista, Staff Scientist, Cambridge Brain Sciences, PhD in Measurement

    There is a clear relationship between satisfaction with IT and the IT department’s innovation leadership.

    Prevent “airline magazine syndrome” by proactively analyzing disruptive technologies

    “The last thing the CIO needs is an executive saying ‘I don’t what it is or what it does…but I want two of them!”
    – Tim Lalonde

    Airline magazine syndrome happens to IT leaders caught between the business and IT. It usually occurs in this manner:

    1. While on a flight, a senior executive reads about an emerging technology that has exciting implications for the business in an airline magazine.
    2. The executive returns and approaches IT, demanding that action be taken to address the disruptive technology – and that it should have been (ideally) completed already.

    Without a Disruptive Technology Exploitation Plan:

    “I don’t know”

    With a Disruptive Technology Exploitation Plan:

    “Here in IT, we have already considered that technology and decided it was overhyped. Let me show you our analysis and invite you to join our working group.”

    OR

    “We have already considered that technology and have started testing it. Let me show you our testing lab and invite you to join our working group.”

    Info-Tech Insight

    Airline magazine syndrome is a symptom of a wider problem: poor CEO-CIO alignment. Solve this problem with improved communication and documentation. Info-Tech’s disruptive tech iterative process will make airline magazine syndrome a thing of the past!

    IT leaders who do not keep up with disruptive technology will find their roles diminished

    “Today’s CIO dominion is in a decaying orbit with CIOs in existential threat mode.”
    – Ken Magee

    Protect your role within IT

    • IT is threatened by disruptive technology:
      • Trends like cloud services, increased automation, and consumerization reduce the need for IT to be involved in every aspect of deploying and using technology.
      • In the long term, machines will replace even intellectually demanding IT jobs, such as infrastructure admin and high-level planning.
    • Protect your role in IT by:
      • Anticipating new technology that will disrupt the IT department and your place within it.
      • Defining new IT roles and responsibilities that accurately reflect the reality of technology today.
      • Having a process for the above that does not diminish your ability to keep up with everyday operations that remain a priority today.

    Protect your role against other departments

    • Your role in the business is threatened by disruptive technology:
      • The trends that make IT less involved with technology allow other executives – such as the CMO – to make IT investments.
      • As the CMO gains the power and data necessary to embrace new trends, the CIO and IT managers have less pull.
    • Protect your role in the business by:
      • Being the individual to consult about new technology. It isn’t just a power play; IT leaders should be the ones who know technology thoroughly.
      • Becoming an indispensable part of the entire business’ innovation strategy through proposing and executing a process for exploiting disruptive technology.

    IT leaders who do keep up have an opportunity to solidify their roles as experts and aggregators

    “The IT department plays a critical role in [innovation]. What they can do is identify a technology that potentially might introduce improvements to the organization, whether it be through efficiency, or through additional services to constituents.”
    – Michael Maguire, Management Consultant

    The contemporary CIO is a conductor, ensuring that IT works in harmony with the rest of the business.

    The new CIO is a conductor, not a musician. The CIO is taking on the role of a business engineer, working with other executives to enable business innovation.

    The new CIO is an expert and an aggregator. Conductor CIOs increasingly need to keep up on the latest technologies. They will rely on experts in each area and provide strategic synthesis to decide if, and how, developments are relevant in order to tune their IT infrastructure.

    The pace of technological advances makes progress difficult to predict

    “An analysis of the history of technology shows that technological change is exponential, contrary to the common-sense ‘intuitive linear’ view. So we won’t experience 100 years of progress in the 21st century – it will be more like 20,000 years of progress (at today’s rate).”
    – Ray Kurzweil

    Technology advances exponentially. Rather than improving by the same amount of capability each year, it multiplies in capability each year.

    Think like a futurist to anticipate technology before it goes mainstream.

    Exponential growth happens much faster than linear growth, especially when it hits the knee of the curve. Even those who acknowledge exponential growth underestimate how capabilities can improve.

    To predict new advances, turn innovation into a process

    “We spend 70 percent of our time on core search and ads. We spend 20 percent on adjacent businesses, ones related to the core businesses in some interesting way. Examples of that would be Google News, Google Earth, and Google Local. And then 10 percent of our time should be on things that are truly new.”
    – Eric Schmidt, Google

    • Don’t get caught in the trap of refining your core processes to the exclusion of innovation. You should always be looking for new processes to improve, new technology to pilot, and where possible, new businesses to get into.
    • Devote about 10% of your time and resources to exploring new technology: the potential rewards are huge.

    You and your team need to analyze technology every year to predict where it’s going.

    A bar graph is shown which depicts the proportion of technology use from 2018-2022. the included devices are: Tablets; PCs; TVs; Non-smartphones; Smartphones; M2M
    • Foundational technologies, such as computing power, storage, and networks, are improving exponentially.
    • Disruptive technologies are specific manifestations of foundational advancements. Advancements of greater magnitude give rise to more manifestations; therefore, there will be more disruptive technologies every year.
    • There is a lot of noise to cut through. Remember Google Glasses? As technology becomes ubiquitous and consumerization reigns, everybody is a technology expert. How do you decide which technologies to focus on?

    Protect IT and the business from disruption by implementing a simple, repeatable disruptive technology exploitation process

    “One of the most consistent patterns in business is the failure of leading companies to stay at the top of their industries when technologies or markets change […] Managers must beware of ignoring new technologies that can’t initially meet the needs of their mainstream customers.”
    – Joseph L. Bower and Clayton M. Christensen

    Challenge

    Solution

    New technology can hit like a meteor, but it doesn’t have to leave a crater:

    Use the annual process described in this blueprint to create a formal evaluation of new technology that turns analysis into action.

    Predicting the future isn’t easy, but it can be done:

    Lead the analysis from the office of the CIO. Establish a team to carry out the annual process as a cure for airline magazine syndrome.

    Your role is endangered, but you can survive:

    Train your team on the patterns of progress, track technology over time in a central database, and read Info-Tech’s analysis of upcoming technology.

    Communication is difficult when the sky is falling, so have a simple way to get the message across:

    Track metrics that communicate your progress, and summarize the results in a single, easy-to-read exploitation plan.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Use Info-Tech’s tools and templates, along with this storyboard, to walk you through creating and executing an exploitation process in six steps.

    Create measurable value by using Info-Tech’s process for evaluating the disruptive potential of technology

    This image contains a bar graph with the following Title: Which are the primary benefits you've either realized or expect to realize by deploying hyperconverged infrastructure in the near term.

    No business process is perfect.

    • Use Info-Tech’s Proof of Concept Template to create a disruptive technology proof of concept implementation plan.
    • Harness your company’s internal wisdom to systematically vet new technology. Engage only in calculated risk and maximize potential benefit.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Inevitably, some proof of concept projects will not benefit the organization. The projects that are successful will more than cover the costs of the failed projects. Roll out small scale and minimize losses.

    Establish your key performance indicators (KPIs)

    Key performance indicators allow for rigorous analysis, which generates insight into utilization by platform and consumption by business activity.

    • Brainstorm metrics that indicate when process improvement is actually taking place.
    • Have members of the group pitch KPIs; the facilitator should record each suggestion on a whiteboard.
    • Make sure to have everyone justify the inclusion of each metric: how does it relate to the improvement that the proof of concept project is intended to drive? How does it relate to the overall goals of the business?
    • Include a list of KPIs, along with a description and a target (ensuring that it aligns with SMART metrics).
    Key Performance Indicator Description Target Result

    Number of Longlist technologies

    Establish a range of Longlist technologies to evaluate 10-15
    Number of Shortlist technologies Establish a range of Shortlist technologies to evaluate 5-10
    number of "look to the past" likes/dislikes Minimum number of testing characteristics 6
    Number of POCs Total number of POCs Approved 3-5

    Communicate your plan with the Disruptive Technology Exploitation Plan Template

    Use the Disruptive Technology Exploitation Plan Template to summarize everything that the group does. Update the report continuously and use it to show others what is happening in the world of disruptive technology.

    Section Title Description
    1 Rationale and Summary of Exploitation Plan A summary of the current efforts that exist for exploring disruptive technology. A summary of the process for exploiting disruptive technology, the resources required, the team members, meeting schedules, and executive approval.
    2 Longlist of Potentially Disruptive Technologies A summary of the longlist of identified disruptive technologies that could affect the organization, shortened to six or less that have the largest potential impact based on Info-Tech’s Disruptive Technology Shortlisting Tool.
    3 Analysis of Shortlist Individually analyze each technology placed on the shortlist using Info-Tech’s Disruptive Technology Value-Readiness and SWOT Analysis Tool.
    4 Proof of Concept Plan Use the results from Section 3 to establish a plan for moving forward with the technologies on the shortlist. Determine the tasks required to implement the technologies and decide who will complete them and when.
    5 Hand-off Pass the project along to identified stakeholders with significant interest in its success. Continue to track metrics and prepare to repeat the disruptive technology exploitation process annually.

    Whether you need a process for exploiting disruptive technology, or an analysis of current trends, Info-Tech can help

    Two sets of research make up Info-Tech’s disruptive technology coverage:

    This image contains four screenshots from each of the following Info-Tech Blueprints: Exploit disruptive Infrastructure Technology; Infrastructure & operations priorities 2022

    This storyboard, and the associated tools and templates, will walk you through creating a disruptive technology working group of your own.

    Blueprint deliverables

    Each step of this blueprint is accompanied by supporting deliverables to help you accomplish your goals:

    Key deliverable:

    Disruptive Technology Exploitation Plan Template

    The Disruptive Technology Exploitation Plan Template acts as an implementation plan for developing a long-term strategy for monitoring and implementing disruptive technologies.

    Proof of Concept Template

    The Proof of Concept Template will guide you through the creation of a minimum-viable proof-of-concept project.

    Executive Presentation

    The Disruptive Technology Executive Presentation Template will assist you to present an overview of the disruptive technology process, outlining the value to your company.

    Disruptive Technology Value Readiness & SWOT Analysis Tool

    The Disruptive Technology Value Readiness & SWOT Analysis Tool will assist you to systematize notional evaluations of the value and readiness of potential disruptive technologies.

    Disruptive Technology Research Database Tool

    The Disruptive Technology Research Database Tool will help you to keep track of the independent research that is conducted by members of the disruptive technology exploitation working group.

    Disruptive Technology Shortlisting Tool

    The Disruptive Technology Shortlisting Tool will help you to codify the results of the disruptive technology working group's longlist winnowing process.

    Disruptive Technology Look to the Past Tool

    The Disruptive Technology Look to the Past Tool will assist you to collect reasonability test notes when evaluating potential disruptive technologies.

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    “Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful.”

    Guided Implementation

    “Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track.”

    Workshop

    “We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place.”

    Consulting

    “Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project.”

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

    Guided Implementation

    What does a typical GI on this topic look like?

    Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3

    Call #1: Explore the need for a disruptive technology working group.

    Call #3: Review the agenda for the initial meeting.

    Call #5: Review how you’re brainstorming and your sources of information.

    Call #7: Review the final shortlist and assessment.

    Call #9: Review the progress of your team.

    Call #2: Review the team name, participants, and timeline.

    Call #4: Assess the results of the initial meeting.

    Call #6: Review the final longlist and begin narrowing it down.

    Call #8: Review the next steps.

    Call #10: Review the communication plan.

    A Guided Implementation (GI) is a series of calls with an Info-Tech analyst to help implement our best practices in your organization.

    A typical GI is 8 to 12 calls over the course of 4 to 6 months.

    Workshop Overview

    Contact your account representative for more information.
    workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8889

    Pre-Work Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4
    Establish the Disruptive Tech Process Hold Your Initial Meeting Create a Longlist and Assess Shortlist Create Process Maps Develop a Proof of Concept Charter

    Activities

    1.1.a Get executives and stakeholders on board.

    1.1.b Review the process of analyzing disruptive tech.

    1.1.c Select members for the working group.

    1.1.d Choose a schedule and time commitment.

    1.1.e Select a group of visionaries.

    1.2.a Start the meeting with introductions.

    1.2.b Train the group to think like futurists.

    1.2.c Brainstorm about disruptable processes.

    1.2.d Brainstorm a longlist.

    1.2.e Research and brainstorm separate longlists.

    2.1.a Converge the longlists developed by the team.

    2.2.b Narrow the longlist to a shortlist.

    2.2.c Assess readiness and value.

    2.2.d Perform a SWOT analysis.

    3.1.a Build a problem canvas.

    3.1.b Identify affected business units.

    3.1.c Outline and map the business processes likely to be disrupted.

    3.1.d Map disrupted business processes.

    3.1.e Recognize how the new technology will impact business processes.

    3.1.f Make the case.

    3.2.a Develop key performance indicators (KPIs).

    3.2.b Identify key success factors.

    3.2.c Outline project scope.

    3.2.d Identify responsible team.

    3.2.e Complete resource estimation.

    Deliverables

    1. Initialized Disruptive Tech Exploitation Plan
    1. List of Disruptable Organizational Processes
    2. Initial Longlist of Disruptive Tech
    1. Finalized Longlist of Disruptive Tech
    2. Shortlist of Disruptive Tech
    3. Value-Readiness Analysis
    4. SWOT Analysis
    5. Candidate(s) for Proof of Concept Charter
    1. Problem Canvas
    2. Map of Business Processes: Current State
    3. Map of Disrupted Business Processes
    4. Business Case for Each Technology
    1. Completed Proof of Concept Charter

    Exploit Disruptive Infrastructure Technology

    Disrupt or be disrupted.

    Identify

    Create your working group.

    PHASE 1

    Use Info-Tech’s approach for analyzing disruptive technology in your own disruptive tech working group

    1. Identify
      1. Establish the core working group and select a leader; select a group of visionaries
      2. Train the group to think like futurists
      3. Hold your initial meeting
    2. Resolve
      1. Create and winnow a longlist
      2. Assess and create the shortlist
    3. Evaluate
      1. Create process maps
      2. Develop proof of concept charter

    The Key Is in Anticipation!

    Phase 1: Identify

    Create your working group.

    Activities:

    Step 1.1: Establish the core working group and select a leader; select a group of visionaries
    Step 1.2: Train the group to think like futurists
    Step 1.3: Hold the initial meeting

    This step involves the following participants:

    IT Infrastructure Manager

    CIO or CTO

    Potential members and visionaries of the working group

    Outcomes of this step:

    • Establish a team of subject matter experts that will evaluate new, emerging, and potentially disruptive technologies.
    • Establish a process for including visionaries from outside of the working group who will provide insight and direction.
    • Introduce the core working group members.
    • Gain a better understanding of how technology advances.
    • Brainstorm a list of organizational processes.
    • Brainstorm an initial longlist.

    Step 1.1

    Establish the core working group and select a leader; select a group of visionaries.

    Activities:

    • Articulate the long- and short-term benefits and costs to the entire organization
    • Gain support by articulating the long- and short-term benefits and costs to the IT department
    • Gain commitment from key stakeholders and executives
    • Help stakeholders understand what goes into formally exploiting disruptive tech by reviewing this process
    • Establish the core working group and select a leader
    • Create a schedule with a time commitment appropriate to your organization’s size; it doesn’t need to take long
    • Select a group of visionaries external to IT to help the working group brainstorm disruptive technologies

    This step involves the following participants:

    • IT Infrastructure Manager
    • CIO or CTO
    • Potential members and visionaries of the working group

    Outcomes of this step

    • Establish a team of subject matter experts that will evaluate new, emerging, and potentially disruptive technologies.
    • Establish a process for including visionaries from outside of the working group that will provide insight and direction.

    1.1.A Articulate the long- and short-term benefits and costs to the entire organization

    A cost/benefit analysis will give stakeholders a picture of how disruptive technology could affect the business. Use the chart as a starting point and customize it based on your organization.

    Disruptive Technology Affects the Organization

    Benefits Costs

    Short Term

    • First-mover advantage from implementing new technology in the business before competitors – and before start-ups.
    • Better brand image as an organization focused on innovation.
    • Increased overall employee satisfaction by implementing new technology that increases employee capabilities or lowers effort.
    • Possibility of increased IT budget for integrating new technology.
    • Potential for employees to reject wide-scale use of unfamiliar technology.
    • Potential for technology to fail in the organization if it is not sufficiently tested.
    • Executive time required for making decisions about technology recommended by the team.

    Long Term

    • Increased internal business efficiencies from the integration of new technology (e.g. energy efficiency, fewer employees needed due to automation).
    • Better services or products for customers, resulting in increased long-term revenue.
    • Lowered costs of services or products and potential to grow market share.
    • Continued relevance of established organizations in a world changed by disruptive technologies.
    • Technology may not reach the capabilities initially expected, requiring waiting for increased value or readiness.
    • Potential for customers to reject new products resulting from technology.
    • Lack of focus on current core capabilities if technology is massively disruptive.

    1.1.B Gain support by articulating the long- and short-term benefits and costs to the IT department

    A cost/benefit analysis will give stakeholders a picture of how disruptive technology could affect the business. Use the chart as a starting point and customize it based on your organization.

    Disruptive Technology Affects IT

    BenefitsCosts

    Short Term

    • Perception of IT as a core component of business practices.
    • Increase IT’s capabilities to better serve employees (e.g. faster network speeds, better uptime, and storage and compute capacity that meet demands).
    • Cost for acquiring or implementing new technology and updating infrastructure to integrate with it.
    • Cost for training IT staff and end users on new IT technology and processes.
    • Minor costs for initial setup of disruptive technology exploitation process and time taken by members.

    Long Term

    • More efficient and powerful IT infrastructure that capitalizes on emerging trends at the right time.
    • Lower help desk load due to self-service and automation technology.
    • Increased satisfaction with IT due to implementation of improved enterprise technology and visible IT influence on improvements.
    • Increased end-user satisfaction with IT due to understanding and support of consumer technology that affects their lives.
    • New technology may result in lower need for specific IT roles. Cultural disruptions due to changing role of IT.
    • Perception of failure if technology is tested and never implemented.
    • Expectation that IT will continue to implement the newest technology available, even when it has been dismissed as not having value.

    1.1.C Gain commitment from key stakeholders and executives

    Gaining approval from executives and key stakeholders is the final obstacle. Ensure that you cover the following items to have the best chance for project approval.

    • Use a sample deck similar to this section for gaining buy-in, ensuring that you add/remove information to make it specific to your organization. Cover this section, including:
      • Who: Who will lead the team and who will be on it (working group)?
      • What: What resources will be required by the team (costs)?
      • Where/When: How often and where will the team meet (meeting schedule)?
      • Why: Why is there a need to exploit disruptive technology (benefits and examples)?
      • How: How is the team going to exploit disruptive technology (the process)?
    • Go through this blueprint prior to presenting the plan to stakeholders so that you have a strong understanding of the details behind each process and tool.
    • Frame the first iteration of the cycle as a pilot program. Use the completed results of the pilot to establish exploiting disruptive technology as a necessary company initiative.

    Insert the resources required by the disruptive tech exploitation team into Section 1.5 of the Disruptive Technology Exploitation Plan Template. Have executives sign-off on the project in Section 1.6.

    Disruption has undermined some of the most successful tech companies

    “The IT department plays a critical role in [innovation]. What they can do is identify a technology that potentially might introduce improvements to the organization, whether it be through efficiency or through additional services to constituents.”
    - Michael Maguire, Management Consultant

    VoIP’s transformative effects

    Disruptive technology:
    Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) is a modern means of making phone calls through the internet by sending voice packets using data, as opposed to the traditional circuit transmissions of the PSTN.

    Who won:
    Organizations that realized the cost savings that VoIP provided for businesses with a steady internet connection saved as much as 60% on telephony expenses. Even in the early stages, with a few more limitations, organizations were able to save a significant amount of money and the technology has continued to improve.

    Who lost?
    Telecom-related companies that failed to realize VoIP was a potential threat to their market, and organizations that lacked the ability to explore and implement the disruptive technology early.

    Digital photography — the new norm

    Disruptive technology:
    Digital photography refers to the storing of photographs in a digital format, as opposed to traditional photography, which exposes light to sensitive photographic film.

    Who won:
    Photography companies and new players that exploited the evolution of data storage and applied it to photography succeeded. Those that were able to balance providing traditional photography and exploiting and introducing digital photography, such as Nikon, left competitors behind. Smartphone manufacturers also benefited by integrating digital cameras.

    Who lost?
    Photography companies, such as Kodak, that failed to respond to the digital revolution found themselves outcompeted and insolvent.

    1.1.D Help stakeholders understand what goes into formally exploiting disruptive tech by reviewing this process

    There are five steps to formally exploiting disruptive technology, each with its own individual outputs and tools to take analysis to the next level.

    Step 1.2:
    Hold Initial Meeting

    Output:

    • Initial list of disruptable processes;
    • Initial longlist

    Step 2.1:

    Brainstorm Longlist

    Output:

    • Finalized longlist;
    • Shortlist

    Step 2.2:

    Assess Shortlist

    Output:

    • Final shortlist;
    • SWOT analysis;
    • Tech categorization

    Step 3.1:
    Create Process Maps

    Output:

    • Completed process maps

    Step 3.2:
    Develop a proof of concept charter

    Output:

    • Proof-of-concept template with KPIs

    Info-Tech Insight

    Before going to stakeholders, complete the entire blueprint to better understand the tools and outputs of the process.

    1.1.E Establish the core working group and select a leader

    • Selecting your core membership for the working group is a critical step to the group’s success. Ensure that you satisfy the following criteria:
      • This is a team of subject matter experts. They will be overseeing the learning and piloting of disruptive technologies. Their input will also be valuable for senior executives and for implementing these technologies.
      • Choose members that can take time away from firefighting tasks to dedicate time to meetings.
      • It may be necessary to reach outside of the organization now or in the future for expertise on certain technologies. Use Info-Tech as a source of information.
    Organization Size Working Group Size
    Small 02-Jan
    Medium 05-Mar
    Large 10-May
    • Once the team is established, you must decide who will lead the group. Ensure that you satisfy the following criteria:
      • A leader should be credible, creative, and savvy in both technology and business.
      • The leader should facilitate, acting as both an expert and an aggregator of the information gathered by the team.

    Choose a compelling name

    The working group needs a name. Be sure to select one with a positive connotation within your organization.

    Section 1.3 of the Disruptive Technology Exploitation Plan Template

    1.1.F Create a schedule with a time commitment appropriate to your organization’s size; it doesn’t need to take long

    Time the disruptive technology working group’s meetings to coincide and integrate with your organization’s strategic planning — at least annually.

    Size Meeting Frequency Time per Meeting Example Meeting Activities
    Small Annually One day A one-day meeting to run through phase 2 of the project (SWOT analysis and shortlist analysis).
    Medium Two days A two-day meeting to run through the project. The additional meeting involves phase 3 of this deck, developing a proof-of-concept plan.
    Large Two+ days Two meetings, each two days. Two days to create and winnow the longlist (phase 2), and two further days to develop a proof of concept plan.

    “Regardless of size, it’s incumbent upon every organization to have some familiarity of what’s happening over the next few years, [and to try] to anticipate what some of those trends may be. […] These trends are going to accelerate IT’s importance in terms of driving business strategy.”
    – Vern Brownell, CEO, D-Wave

    Section 1.4 of the Disruptive Technology Exploitation Plan Template

    1.1.G Select a group of visionaries external to IT to help the working group brainstorm disruptive technologies

    Selecting advisors for your group is an ongoing step, and the roster can change.

    Ensure that you satisfy the following criteria:

    • Look beyond IT to select a team representing several business units.
    • Check for self-professed “geeks” and fans of science fiction that may be happy to join.
    • Membership can be a reward for good performance.

    This group does not have to meet as regularly as the core working group. Input from external advisors can occur between meetings. You can also include them on every second or third iteration of the entire process.

    However, the more input you can get into the group, the more innovative it can become.

    “It is … important to develop design fictions based on engagement with directly or indirectly implicated publics and not to be designed by experts alone.”
    – Emmanuel Tsekleves, Senior Lecturer in Design Interactions, University of Lancaster

    Section 1.3 of the Disruptive Technology Exploitation Plan Template

    The following case study illustrates the innovative potential that is created when you include a diverse group of people

    INDUSTRY - Chip Manufacturing
    SOURCE - Clayton Christensen, Intel

    To achieve insight, you need to collaborate with people from outside of your department.

    Challenge

    • Headquartered in California, through the 1990s, Intel was the largest microprocessor chip manufacturer in the world, with revenue of $25 billion in 1997.
    • All was not perfect, however. Intel faced a challenge from Cyrix, a manufacturer of low-end chips. In 18 months, Cyrix’s share of the low-margin entry-level chip manufacturing business mushroomed from 10% to 70%.

    Solution

    • Troubled by the potential for significant disruption of the microprocessor market, Intel brought in external consultants to hold workshops to educate managers about disruptive innovation.
    • Managers would break into groups and discuss ways Intel could facilitate the disruption of its competitors. In one year, Intel hosted 18 workshops, and 2,000 managers went through the process.

    Results

    • Intel launched the Celeron chip to serve the lower end of the PC market and win market share back from Cyrix (which no longer exists as an independent company) and other competitors like AMD.
    • Within one year, Intel had captured 35% of the market.

    “[The models presented in the workshops] gave us a common language and a common way to frame the problem so that we could reach a consensus around a counterintuitive course of action.” – Andy Grove, then-CEO, Intel Corporation

    Phase 1: Identify

    Create your working group.

    Activities:

    Step 1.1: Establish the core working group and select a leader; select a group of visionaries
    Step 1.2: Train the group to think like futurists
    Step 1.3: Hold the initial meeting

    This step involves the following participants:

    • IT Infrastructure Manager
    • CIO or CTO
    • Potential members and visionaries of the working group

    Outcomes of this phase:

    • Establish a team of subject matter experts that will evaluate new, emerging, and potentially disruptive technologies.
    • Establish a process for including visionaries from outside of the working group who will provide insight and direction.
    • Introduce the core working group members.
    • Gain a better understanding of how technology advances.
    • Brainstorm a list of organizational processes.
    • Brainstorm an initial longlist.

    Step 1.2

    Train the group to think like futurists

    Activities:

    1. Look to the past to predict the future:
      • Step 1: Review the technology opportunities you missed
      • Step 2: Review and record what you liked about the tech
      • Step 3: Review and record your dislikes
      • Step 4: Record and test the reasonability
    2. Crash course on futurology principles
    3. Peek into the future

    This step involves the following participants:

    • IT Infrastructure Manager
    • CIO or CTO
    • Core working group members
    • Visionaries

    Outcomes of this step

    • Team members thinking like futurists
    • Better understanding of how technology advances
    • List of past examples and characteristics

    Info-Tech Insight

    Business buy-in is essential. Manage your business partners by providing a summary of the EDIT methodology and process. Validate the process value, which will allow you create a team of IT and business representatives.

    1.2 Train the group to think like futurists

    1 hour

    Ensure the team understands how technology advances and how they can identify patterns in upcoming technologies.

    1. Lead the group through a brainstorming session.
    2. Follow the next phases and steps.
    3. This session should be led by someone who can facilitate a thought-provoking discussion.
    4. This training deck finishes with a video.

    Input

    • Facilitated creativity
    • Training deck [following slides]

    Output

    • Inspiration
    • Anonymous ideas

    Materials

    • Futurist training “steps”
    • Pen and paper

    Participants

    • Core working group
    • Visionaries
    • Facilitator

    1.2.A Look to the past to predict the future

    30 minutes

    Step 1

    Step 2 Step 3 Step 4

    Review what you missed.

    What did you like?

    What did you dislike?

    Test the reasonability.

    Think about a time you missed a technical disruptive opportunity.

    Start with a list of technologies that changed your business and processes.

    Consider those specifically you could have identified with a repeatable process.

    What were the most impactful points about the technology?

    Define a list of “characteristics” you liked.

    Create a shortlist of items.

    Itemize the impact to process, people, and technology.

    Why did you pass on the tech?

    Define a list of “characteristics” you did not like.

    Create a shortlist of items.

    Itemize the impact to process, people, and technology.

    Avoid the “arm chair quarterback” view.

    Refer to the six positive and negative points.

    Check against your data points at the end of each phase.

    Record the list of missed opportunities

    Record 6 characteristics

    Record 6 characteristics

    Completed “Think like a Futurists” tool

    Use the Disruptive Technology Research Look to the Past Tool to record your output.

    Input

    • Facilitated creativity
    • Speaker’s notes

    Output

    • Inspiration
    • Anonymous ideas
    • Recorded missed opportunities
    • Recorded positive points
    • Recorded dislikes
    • Reasonability test list

    Materials

    • Futurist training “steps”
    • Pen and paper
    • “Look to the Past” tool

    Participants

    • Core working group
    • Visionaries
    • Facilitator

    Understand how the difference between linear and exponential growth will completely transform many organizations in the next decade

    “The last ten years have seen exponential growth in research on disruptive technologies and their impact on industries, supply chains, resources, training, education and employment markets … The debate is still open on who will be the winners and losers of future industries, but what is certain is that change has picked up pace and we are now in a new technology revolution whose impact is potentially greater than the industrial revolution.”
    – Gary L. Evans

    Exponential advancement will ensure that life in the next decade will be very different from life today.

    • Linear growth happens one step at a time.
    • The difference between linear and exponential is hard to notice, at first.
    • We are now at the knee of the curve.

    What about email?

    • Consider the amount of email you get daily
    • Double it
    • Triple it

    Exponential growth happens much faster than linear growth, especially when it hits the knee of the curve. Technology grows exponentially, and we are approaching the knee of the curve.

    This graph is adapted from research by Ray Kurzweil.

    Growth: Linear vs. Exponential

    This image contains a graph demonstrating examples of exponential and linear trends.

    1.2.B Crash course on futurology principles

    1 hour

    “An analysis of the history of technology shows that technological change is exponential, contrary to the common-sense ‘intuitive linear’ view. So we won’t experience 100 years of progress in the 21st century — it will be more like 20,000 years of progress (at today’s rate).”
    - Ray Kurzweil

    Review the differences between exponential and linear growth

    The pace of technological advances makes progress difficult to predict.

    Technology advances exponentially. Rather than improving by the same amount of capability each year, it multiplies in capability each year.

    Think like a futurist to anticipate technology before it goes mainstream.

    Exponential growth happens much faster than linear growth, especially when it hits the knee of the curve. Even those who acknowledge exponential growth underestimate how capabilities can improve.

    The following case study illustrates the rise of social media providers

    “There are 7.7 billion people in the world, with at least 3.5 billion of us online. This means social media platforms are used by one in three people in the world and more than two-thirds of all internet users.”
    – Esteban Ortiz-Ospina

    This graph depicts the trend of the number of people using social media platforms between 2005 and 2019

    The following case study illustrates the rapid growth of Machine to Machine (M2M) connections

    A bar graph is shown which depicts the proportion of technology use from 2018-2022. the included devices are: Tablets; PCs; TVs; Non-smartphones; Smartphones; M2M

    Ray Kurzweil’s Law of Accelerating Returns

    “Ray Kurzweil has been described as ‘the restless genius’ by The Wall Street Journal, and ‘the ultimate thinking machine’ by Forbes. He was ranked #8 among entrepreneurs in the United States by Inc Magazine, calling him the ‘rightful heir to Thomas Edison,’ and PBS included Ray as one of 16 ‘revolutionaries who made America,’ along with other inventors of the past two centuries.”
    Source: KurzweilAI.net

    Growth is linear?

    “Information technology is growing exponentially. That’s really my main thesis, and our intuition about the future is not exponential, it’s really linear. People think things will go at the current pace …1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 30 steps later, you’re at 30.”

    Better IT strategy enables future business innovation

    “The reality of information technology like computers, like biological technologies now, is it goes exponentially … 2, 4, 8, 16. At step 30, you’re at a billion, and this is not an idle speculation about the future.” [emphasis added]

    “When I was a student at MIT, we all shared a computer that cost tens of millions of dollars. This computer [pulling his smartphone out of his pocket] is a million times cheaper, a thousand times more powerful — that’s a billion-fold increase in MIPS per dollar, bits per dollar… and we’ll do it again in 25 years.”
    Source: “IT growth and global change: A conversation with Ray Kurzweil,” McKinsey & Company

    1.2.C Peak into the future

    1 hour

    Leverage industry roundtables and trend reports to understand the art of the possible

    • Uncover important business and industry trends that can inform possibilities for technology disruption.
    • Market research is critical in identifying factors external to your organization and identifying technology innovation that will provide a competitive edge. It’s important to evaluate the impact each trend or opportunity will have in your organization and market.

    Visit Info-Tech’s Trends & Priorities Research Center

    Visit Info-Tech’s Industry Coverage Research to get started.

    Phase 1: Identify

    Create your working group

    Activities:

    Step 1.1: Establish the core working group and select a leader; select a group of visionaries
    Step 1.2: Train the group to think like futurists
    Step 1.3: Hold the initial meeting

    This step involves the following participants:

    • IT Infrastructure Manager
    • CIO or CTO
    • Potential members and visionaries of the working group

    Outcomes of this phase:

    • Establish a team of subject matter experts that will evaluate new, emerging, and potentially disruptive technologies.
    • Establish a process for including visionaries from outside of the working group who will provide insight and direction.
    • Introduce the core working group members.
    • Gain a better understanding of how technology advances.
    • Brainstorm a list of organizational processes.
    • Brainstorm an initial longlist.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Establish the longlist. The longlist help create a holistic view of most technologies that could impact the business. Assigning values and quadrant scoring will shortlist the options and focus your PoC option.

    Step 1.3

    Hold the initial meeting

    Activities:

    1. Create an agenda for the meeting
    2. Start the kick-off meeting with introductions and a recap
    3. Brainstorm about creating a better future
    4. Begin brainstorming an initial longlist
    5. Have team members develop separate longlists for their next meeting

    This step involves the following participants:

    • IT Infrastructure Manager
    • CIO or CTO
    • Core working group members
    • Visionaries

    Outcomes of this step

    • Introduce the core working group members
    • Gain a better understanding of how technology advances
    • Brainstorm a list of organizational processes
    • Brainstorm an initial longlist

    1.3.A Create an agenda for the meeting

    1 hour

    Kick-off this cycle of the disruptive technology process by welcoming your visionaries and introducing your core working group.

    The purpose of the initial meeting is to brainstorm where new technology will be the most disruptive within the organization. You’ll develop two longlists: one of business processes and one of disruptive technology. These longlists are in addition to the independent research your core working group will perform before Phase 2.

    • Find an outgoing facilitator. Sitting back will let you focus more on ideating, and an engaging presenter will help bring out ideas from your visionaries.
    • The training deck (see step 1.2c) includes presenting a video. We’ve included some of our top choices for you to choose from.
      • Feel free to find your own video or bring in a keynote speaker.
      • The object of the video is to get the group thinking about the future.
      • Customize the training deck as needed.
    • If a cycle has been completed, present your findings and all of the group’s completed deliverables in the first section.
    • This session is the only time you have with your visionaries. Get their ideas on what technologies will be disruptive to start forming a longlist.

    Info-Tech Insight

    The disruptive tech team is prestigious. If your organization is large enough or has the resources, consider having this meeting in an offsite location. This will drive excitement to join the working group if the opportunity arises and incentivize good work.

    Meeting Agenda (Sample)

    Time

    Activity

    8:00am-8:30am Introductions and previous meeting recap
    8:30am-9:30am Training deck
    9:30 AM-10:00am Brainstorming
    10:00am-10:15am Break
    10:15am-10:45am Develop good research techniques
    10:45am-12:00pm Begin compiling your longlist

    Info-Tech Insight

    The disruptive tech team is prestigious. If your organization is large enough or has the resources, consider having this meeting in an offsite location. This will drive excitement to join the working group if the opportunity arises and incentivize good work.

    1.3.B Start the kick-off meeting with introductions and a summary of what work has been done so far

    30 minutes

    1. Start the meeting off with an icebreaker activity. This isn’t an ordinary business meeting – or even group – so we recommend starting off with an activity that will emphasize this unique nature. To get the group in the right mindset, try this activity:
      1. Go around the group and have people present:
      2. Their names and roles
      3. Pose some or all of the following questions/prompts to the group:
        • “Tell me about something you have created.”
        • “Tell me about a time you created a process or program considered risky.”
        • “Tell me about a situation in which you had to come up with several new ideas in a hurry. Were they accepted? Were they successful?”
        • “Tell me about a time you took a risk.”
        • “Tell me about one of your greatest failures and what you learned from it.”
    2. Once everyone has been introduced, present any work that has already been completed.
      1. If you have already completed a cycle, give a summary of each technology that you investigated and the results from any piloting.
      2. If this is the first cycle for the working group, present the information decided in Step 1.1.

    Input

    • Disruptive technology exploitation plan

    Output

    • Networking
    • Brainstorming

    Materials

    • Meeting agenda

    Participants

    • Core working group
    • Visionaries
    • Facilitator

    1.3.C Brainstorm about creating a better future for the company, the stakeholders, and the employees

    30 minutes

    Three sticky notes are depicted, at the top of each note are the following titles: What can we do better; How can we make a better future; How can we continue being successful

    1. Have everyone put up at least two ideas for each chart paper.
    2. Go around the room and discuss their ideas. You may generate some new ideas here.

    These generated ideas are organizational processes that can be improved or disrupted with emerging technologies. This list will be referenced throughout Phases 2 and 3.

    Input

    • Inspiration
    • Anonymous ideas

    Output

    • List of processes

    Materials

    • Chart paper and markers
    • Pen and paper

    Participants

    • Core working group
    • Visionaries

    1.3.D Begin brainstorming a longlist of future technology, and discuss how these technologies will impact the business

    30 minutes

    • Use the Disruptive Technology Research Database Tool to organize technologies and ideas. Longstanding working groups can track technologies here over the course of several years, updating the tool between meetings.
    • Guide the discussion with the following questions, and make sure to focus on the processes generated from Step 1.2.d.

    Focus on

    The Technology

    • What is the technology and what does it do?
    • What processes can it support?

    Experts and Other Organizations

    • What are the vendors saying about the technology?
    • Are similar organizations implementing the technology?

    Your Organization

    • Is the technology ready for wide-scale distribution?
    • Can the technology be tested and implemented now?

    The Technology’s Value

    • Is there any indication of the cost of the technology?
    • How much value will the technology bring?

    Download the Disruptive Technology Database Tool

    Input

    • Inspiration
    • List of processes

    Output

    • Initial longlist

    Materials

    • Chart paper and markers
    • Pen and paper
    • Disruptive Technology Research Database Tool

    Participants

    • Core working group
    • Visionaries

    1.3.E Explore these sources to generate your disruptive technology longlist for the next meeting

    30 Minutes

    There are many sources of information on new and emerging technology. Explore as many sources as you can.

    Science fiction is a valid source of learning. It drives and is influenced by disruptive technology.

    “…the inventor of the first liquid-fuelled rocket … was inspired by H.G. Wells’ science fiction novel War of the Worlds (1898). More recent examples include the 3D gesture-based user interface used by Tom Cruise’s character in Minority Report (2002), which is found today in most touch screens and the motion sensing capability of Microsoft’s Kinect. Similarly, the tablet computer actually first appeared in Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) and the communicator – which we’ve come to refer today as the mobile phone – was first used by Captain Kirk in Star Trek (1966).”
    – Emmanuel Tsekleves, senior lecturer, University of Lancaster

    Right sources: blogs, tech news sites, tech magazines, the tech section of business sites, popular science books about technology, conferences, trade publications, and vendor announcements

    Quantity over quality: early research is not the time to dismiss ideas.

    Discuss with your peers: spark new and innovative ideas

    Insert a brief summary of how independent research is conducted in Section 2.1 of the Disruptive Technology Exploitation Plan Template.

    1.3.E (Cont.) Explore these sources to generate your disruptive technology longlist for the next meeting

    30 Minutes

    There are many sources of information on new and emerging technology. Use this list to kick-start your search.

    Connect with practitioners that are worth their weight in Reddit gold. Check out topic-based LinkedIn groups and subreddits such as r/sysadmin and r/tech. People experienced with technology frequent these groups.

    YouTube is for more than cat videos. Many vendors use YouTube for distributing their previous webinars. There are also videos showcasing various technologies that are uploaded by lecturers, geeks, researchers, and other technology enthusiasts.

    Test your reasonability. Check your “Think Like a Futurist” Tool

    Resolve

    Evaluate Disruptive Technologies

    PHASE 2

    Phase 2: Resolve

    Evaluate disrupted technologies

    Activities:

    Step 2.1: Create and Winnow a Longlist
    Step 2.2: Assess Shortlist

    Info-Tech Insight

    Long to short … that’s the short of it. Using SWOT, value readiness, and quadrant mapping review sessions will focus the longlist, creating a shortlist of potential PoC candidates to review and consider.

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Core working group
    • Infrastructure Management

    Outcomes of this step:

    • Finalized longlist
    • Finalized shortlist
    • Initial analysis of each technology on the shortlist

    Step 2.1

    Create and winnow a longlist

    Activities:

    1. Converge everyone’s longlists
    2. Narrow technologies from the longlist down to a shortlist using Info-Tech’s Disruptive Technology Shortlisting Tool
    3. Use the shortlisting tool to help participants visualize the potential
    4. Input the technologies on your longlist into the Disruptive Technology Shortlisting Tool to produce a shortlist

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Core working group members

    Outcomes of this step:

    • Finalized longlist
    • Finalized shortlist
    • Initial analysis of each technology on the shortlist

    2.1 Organize a meeting with the core working group to combine your longlists and create a shortlist

    1 hour

    Plan enough time to talk about each technology on the list. Each technology was included for a reason.

    • Start with the longlist. Review the longlist compiled at the initial meeting, and then have everyone present the lists that they independently researched.
    • Focus on the company’s context. Make sure that the working group analyzes these disruptive technologies in the context of the organization.
    • Start to compile the shortlist. Begin narrowing down the longlist by excluding technologies that are not relevant.

    Meeting Agenda (Sample)

    TimeActivity
    8:00am-9:30amConverge longlists
    9:30am-10:00amBreak
    10:00am-10:45amDiscuss tech in organizational context
    10:45am-11:15amBegin compiling the shortlist

    Disruptive Technology Exploitation Plan Template

    2.1.A Converge the longlists developed by your team

    90 minutes

    • Start with the longlist developed at the initial meeting. Write this list on the whiteboard.
    • If applicable, have a member present the longlist that was created in the last cycle. Remove technologies that:
      • Are no longer disruptive (e.g. have been implemented or rejected).
      • Have become foundational.
    • Eliminate redundancy: remove items that are very similar.
    • Have members “pitch” items on their lists:
      • Explain why their technologies will be disruptive (2-5 minutes maximum)
      • Add new technologies to the whiteboard
    • Record the following for metrics:
      • Each presented technology
      • Reasons the technology could be disruptive
      • Source of the information
    • Use Info-Tech’s Disruptive Technology Research Database Tool as a starting point.

    Insert the final longlist into Section 2.2 of your Disruptive Technology Exploitation Plan Template.

    Input

    • Longlist developed at first meeting
    • Independent research
    • Previous longlist

    Output

    • Finalized longlist

    Materials

    • Disruptive Technology Research Database Tool
    • Whiteboard and markers
    • Virtual whiteboard

    Participants

    • Core working group

    Review the list of processes that were brainstormed by the visionary group, and ask for input from others

    • IT innovation is most highly valued by the C-suite when it improves business processes, reduces costs, and improves core products and services.
    • By incorporating this insight into your working group’s analysis, you help to attract the attention of senior management and reinforce the group’s necessity.
    • Any input you can get from outside of IT will help your group understand how technology can be disruptive.
      • Visionaries consulted in Phase 1 are a great source for this insight.
    • The list of processes that they helped to brainstorm in Step 1.2 reflects processes that can be impacted by technology.
    • Info-Tech’s research has shown time and again that both CEOs and CIOs want IT to innovate around:
      • Improving business processes
      • Improving core products and services
      • Reducing costs

    Improved business processes

    80%

    Core product and service improvement

    48%

    Reduced costs

    48%

    Increased revenues

    23%

    Penetration into new markets

    21%

    N=364 CXOs & CIOs from the CEO-CIO Alignment Diagnostic Questions were asked on a 7-point scale of 1 = Not at all to 7 = Very strongly. Results are displayed as percentage of respondents selecting 6 or 7.

    Info-Tech Insight

    The disruptive tech team is prestigious. If your organization is large enough or has the resources, consider having this meeting in an offsite location. This will drive excitement to join the working group if the opportunity arises and incentivize good work.

    2.1.B Narrow technologies from the longlist down to a shortlist using Info-Tech’s Disruptive Technology Shortlisting Tool

    90 minutes

    To decide which technology has potential for your organization, have the working group or workshop participants evaluate each technology:

    1. Record each potentially disruptive technology in the longlist on a whiteboard.
    2. Making sure to carefully consider the meaning of the terms, have each member of the group evaluate each technology as “high” or “low” along each of the axes, innovation and transformation, on a piece of paper.
    3. The facilitator collects each piece of paper and inputs the results by technology into the Disruptive Technology Shortlisting Tool.
    Technology Innovation Transformation
    Conversational Commerce High High

    Insert the final shortlist into Section 2.2 of your Disruptive Technology Exploitation Plan Template.

    Input

    • Longlist
    • Futurist brainstorming

    Output

    • Shortlist

    Materials

    • Disruptive Technology Research Database Tool
    • Whiteboard and markers
    • Virtual whiteboard

    Participants

    • Core working group

    Disruptive technologies are innovative and transformational

    Innovation

    Transformation

    • Elements:
      • Creative solution to a problem that is relatively new on the scene.
      • It is different, counterintuitive, or insightful or has any combination of these qualities.
    • Questions to Ask:
      • How new is the technology?
      • How different is the technology?
      • Have you seen anything like it before? Is it counterintuitive?
      • Does it offer an insightful solution to a persistent problem?
    • Example:
      • The sharing economy: Today, simple platforms allow people to share rides and lodgings cheaply and have disrupted traditional services.
    • Elements:
      • Positive change to the business process.
      • Highly impactful: impacts a wide variety of roles in a company in a nontrivial way or impacts a smaller number of roles more significantly.
    • Questions to Ask:
      • Will this technology have a big impact on business operations?
      • Will it add substantial value? Will it change the structure of the company?
      • Will it impact a significant number of employees in the organization?
    • Example:
      • Flash memory improved storage technology incrementally by building on an existing foundation.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Technology can be transformational but not innovative. Not every new technology is disruptive. Even where technology has improved the efficiency of the business, if it does this in an incremental way, it might not be worth exploring using this storyboard.

    2.1.C Use the shortlisting tool to help participants visualize the potential

    1 hour

    Use the Disruptive Technology Shortlisting Tool, tabs 2 and 3.

    Assign quadrants

    • Input group members’ names and the entire longlist (up to 30 technologies) into tab 2 of the Disruptive Technology Shortlisting Tool.
    • On tab 3 of the Disruptive Technology Shortlisting Tool, input the quadrant number that corresponds to the innovation and transformation scores each participant has assigned to each technology.

    Note

    This is an assessment meant to serve as a guide. Use discretion when moving forward with a proof-of-concept project for any potentially disruptive technology.

    Participant Evaluation Quadrant
    High Innovation, High Transformation 1
    High Innovation, Low Transformation 2
    Low Innovation, Low Transformation 3
    Low Innovation, High Transformation 4

    four quadrants are depicted, labeled 1-4. The quadrants are coloured as follows: 1- green; 2- yellow; 3; red; 4; yellow

    2.1.D Use the Disruptive Technology Shortlisting Tool to produce a shortlist

    1 hour

    Use the Disruptive Technology Shortlisting Tool, tabs 3 and 4.

    Use the populated matrix and the discussion list to arrive at a shortlist of four to six potentially disruptive technologies.

    • The tool populates each quadrant based on how many votes it received in the voting exercise.
    • Technologies selected for a particular quadrant by a majority of participants are placed in the quadrant on the graph. Where there was no consensus, the technology is placed in the discussion list.
    • Technologies in the upper right quadrant – high transformation and high innovation – are more likely to be good candidates for a proof-of-concept project. Those in the bottom left are likely to be poor candidates, while those in the remaining quadrants are strong on one of the axes and are unlikely candidates for further systematic evaluation.

    This image contains a screenshot from tab 3 of the Disruptive Technology Shortlisting Tool.

    Input the results of the vote into tab 3 of the Disruptive Technology Shortlisting Tool.

    This image contains a screenshot from tab 4 of the Disruptive Technology Shortlisting Tool.

    View the results on tab 4.

    Phase 2: Resolve

    Evaluate disrupted technologies

    Activities:

    Step 2.1: Create and Winnow a Longlist
    Step 2.2:- Assess Shortlist

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Core working group
    • Infrastructure Management

    Outcomes of this step:

    • Finalized longlist
    • Finalized shortlist
    • Initial analysis of each technology on the shortlist

    Assess Shortlist

    Activities:

    1. Assess the value of each technology to your organization by breaking it down into quality and cost
    2. Investigate the overall readiness of the technologies on the shortlist
    3. Interpret each technology’s value score
    4. Conduct a SWOT analysis for each technology on the shortlist
    5. Use Info-Tech’s disruptive technology shortlist analysis to visualize the tool’s outputs
    6. Select the shortlisted technologies you would like to move forward with

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Core working group members
    • IT Management

    Outcomes of this step:

    • Finalized shortlist
    • Initial analysis of each technology on the shortlist

    2.2 Evaluate technologies based on their value and readiness, and conduct a SWOT analysis for each one

    Use the Disruptive Technology Value-Readiness and SWOT Analysis Tool

    • A technology monitor diagram prioritizes investment in technology by analyzing its readiness and value.
      • Readiness: how close the technology is to being practical and implementable in your industry and organization.
      • Value: how worthwhile the technology is, in terms of its quality and its cost.
    • Value and readiness questionnaires are included in the tool to help determine current and future values for each, and the next four slides explain the ratings further.
    • Categorize technology by its value-readiness score, and evaluate how much potential value each technology has and how soon your company can realize that value.
    • Use a SWOT analysis to qualitatively evaluate the potential that each technology has for your organization in each of the four categories (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats).

    The technology monitor diagram appears in tab 9 of the Disruptive Technology Value-Readiness and SWOT Analysis Tool

    This image depicts tab 9 of the Disruptive Technology Value-Readiness and SWOT Analysis Tool

    2.2.A Assess the value of each technology to your organization by breaking it down into quality and cost

    1 hour

    Update the Disruptive Technology Value-Readiness and SWOT Analysis Tool, tab 4.

    Populate the chart to produce a score for each technology’s overall value to the company conceptualized as the interaction of quality and cost.

    Overall Value

    Quality Cost

    Each technology, if it has a product associated with it, can be evaluated along eight dimensions of quality. Consider how well the product performs, its features, its reliability, its conformance, its durability, its serviceability, its aesthetics, and its perceived quality.

    IT budgets are broken down into capital and operating expenditures. A technology that requires a significant investment along either of these lines is unlikely to produce a positive return. Also consider how much time it will take to implement and operate each technology.

    The value assessment is part of the Disruptive Technology Value-Readiness and SWOT Analysis Tool

    This image contains a screenshot from tab 4 of the Disruptive Technology Value-Readiness and SWOT Analysis Tool.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Watch your costs: Technology that seems cheap at first can actually be expensive over time. Be sure to account for operational and opportunity costs as well.

    2.2.B Investigate the overall readiness of the technologies on the shortlist

    1 hour

    Update the Disruptive Technology Value-Readiness and SWOT Analysis Tool, tab 4.

    Overall Readiness

    Age

    How much time has the technology had to mature? Older technology is more likely to be ready for adoption.

    Venture Capital

    The amount of venture capital gathered by important firms in the space is an indicator of market faith.

    Market Size

    How big is the market for the technology? It is more difficult to break into a giant market than a niche market.

    Market Players

    Have any established vendors (Microsoft, Facebook, Google, etc.) thrown their weight behind the technology?

    Fragmentation

    A large number of small companies in the space indicates that the market has yet to reach equilibrium.

    The readiness assessment is part of the Disruptive Technology Value-Readiness and SWOT Analysis Tool

    This image contains a screenshot of the Readiness Scoring tab of the Disruptive Technology Value-Readiness and SWOT Analysis Tool.

    Use a variety of sources to populate the chart

    Google is your friend: search each shortlisted technology to find details about its development and important vendors.

    Websites like Crunchbase, VentureBeat, and Mashable are useful sources for information on the companies involved in a space and the amount of money they have each raised.

    2.2.C Interpret each technology’s value score

    1 hour

    Insert the result of the SWOT analysis into tab 7 of Info-Tech’s Disruptive Technology Value-Readiness and SWOT Analysis Tool.

    Visualize the results of the quality-cost analysis

    • Quality and cost are independently significant; it is essential to understand how each technology stacks up on the axes.
    • Use tab 6 of the Disruptive Technology Value-Readiness and SWOT Analysis Tool for an illustration of how quality and cost interact to produce each technology’s final position on the tech monitor graph.
    • Remember: the score is notional and reflects the values that you have assigned. Be sure to treat it accordingly.

    This image contains a screenshot of the Value Analysis tab of the Disruptive Technology Value-Readiness and SWOT Analysis Tool

    Green represents a technology that scores extremely high on one axis or the other, or quite high on both. These technologies are the best candidates for proof-of-concept projects from a value perspective.

    Red represents a technology that has scored very low on both axes. These technologies will be expensive, time consuming, and of poor quality.

    Yellow represents the fuzzy middle ground. These technologies score moderately on both axes. Be especially careful when considering the SWOT analysis of these technologies.

    2.2.D Conduct a SWOT analysis for each technology on the shortlist

    1 hour

    Use tab 6 of the Disruptive Technology Value-Readiness and SWOT Analysis Tool.

    A formal process for analyzing disruptive technology is the only way to ensure that it is taken seriously.

    Write each technology as a heading on a whiteboard. Spend 10-15 minutes on each technology conducting a SWOT analysis together.

    Consider four categories for each technology:

    • Strengths: Current uses of the technology or supporting technology and ways in which it helps your organization.
    • Weaknesses: Current limitations of the technology and challenges or barriers to adopting it in your organization.
    • Opportunities: Potential uses of the technology, especially as it advances or improves.
    • Threats: Potential negative disruptions resulting from the technology, especially as it advances or improves.

    The list of processes generated at the cycle’s initial meeting is a great source for opportunities and threats.

    Disruptive Technology Value-Readiness and SWOT Analysis Tool

    This image contains screenshots of the technology tab of the Disruptive Technology Value-Readiness and SWOT Analysis Tool.

    2.2.E Use Info-Tech’s disruptive technology shortlist analysis to visualize the tool’s outputs

    1 hour

    Disruptive Technology Value-Readiness and SWOT Analysis Tool, tab 9

    The tool’s final tab displays the results of the value-readiness analysis and the SWOT analysis in a single location.

    This image contains a screenshot from tab 9 of the Disruptive Technology Value-Readiness and SWOT Analysis Tool

    Insert the shortlist analysis report into Section 3 of your Disruptive Technology Exploitation Plan Template.

    2.2.F Select the shortlisted technologies you would like to move forward with

    1 hour

    Present your findings to the working group.

    • The Disruptive Technology Value-Readiness and SWOT Analysis Tool aggregates your inputs in an easy-to-read, consistent way.
    • Present the tool’s outputs to members of the core working group.
    • Explain the scoring and present the graphic to the group. Go over each technology’s strengths and weaknesses as well as the opportunities and threats it presents/poses to the organization.
    • Go through the proof-of-concept planning phase before striking any technologies from the list.

    This image contains a screenshot of the disruptive technology shortlist analysis from the Disruptive Technology Value-Readiness and SWOT Analysis Tool

    Info-Tech Insight

    A technology’s exceptional value and immediate usability make it the best. A technology can be promising and compelling, but it is unsuitable unless it can bring immediate and exceptional value to your organization. Don’t get caught up in the hype.

    Evaluate

    Create an Action Plan to Exploit Disruptive Technologies

    PHASE 3

    Phase 3: Evaluate

    Create an Action Plan to Exploit Disruptive Technologies

    Activities:

    Step 3.1: Create Process Maps
    Step 3.2: Develop Proof of Concept Charter

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Core working group
    • Infrastructure Management
    • Working group leader
    • CIO

    Outcomes of this step:

    • Business process maps before and after disruption
    • Proof of concept charter
    • Key performance indicators
    • Estimation of required resources

    Step 3.1

    Create Process Maps

    Activities:

    1. Creating a problem canvas by identifying stakeholders, jobs, pains, and gains
    2. Clarify the problem the proof-of-concept project will solve
    3. Identify jobs and stakeholders
    4. Outline how disruptive technology will solve the problem
    5. Map business processes
    6. Identify affected business units
    7. Outline and map the business processes likely to be disrupted
    8. Recognize how the new technology will impact business processes
    9. Make the case: Outline why the new business process is superior to the old

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Working group leader
    • CIO

    Outcomes of this step:

    • Business process maps before and after disruption

    3.1 Create an action plan to exploit disruptive technologies

    Clarify the problem in order to make the case. Fill in section 1.1 of Info-Tech’s Proof of Concept Template to clearly outline the problem each proof of concept is designed to solve.

    Establish roles and responsibilities. Use section 1.2 of the template to outline the roles and responsibilities that fall to each member of the team. Ensure that clear lines of authority are delineated and that the list of stakeholders is exhaustive: include the executives whose input will be required for project approval, all the way to the technicians on the frontline responsible for implementing it.

    Outline the solution to the problem. Demonstrate how each proof-of-concept project provides a solution to the problem outlined in section 1.1. Be sure to clarify what makes the particular technology under investigation a potential solution and record the results in section 1.3.

    This image contains a screenshot of the Proof of concept project template

    Use the Proof of Concept Project Template to track the information you gather throughout Phase 3.

    3.1.A Creating a problem canvas by identifying stakeholders, jobs, pains, and gains

    2 hours

    Instructions:

    1. On a whiteboard, draw the visual canvas supplied below.
    2. Select your issue area, and list jobs, pains, and gains in the associated sections.
    3. Record the pains, jobs, and gains in sections 1.1-1.3 of the Proof of Concept Template.

    Gains

    1. More revenue

    2. Job security

    3. ……

    Jobs

    1. Moving product

    2. Per sale value

    3. ……

    Pains

    1. Clunky website

    2. Bad site navigation

    3. ……

    Input

    • Inspiration
    • Anonymous ideas

    Output

    • List of processes

    Materials

    • Chart paper and markers
    • Pen and paper

    Participants

    • Core working group
    • Visionaries

    3.1.B Clarify the problem the proof-of-concept project will solve

    2 hours

    What is the problem?

    • Every technology is designed to solve a problem faced by somebody somewhere. For each technology that your team has decided to move forward with, identify and clearly state the problem it would solve.
    • A clear problem statement is a crucial part of a new technology’s business case. It is impossible to earn buy-in from the rest of the organization without demonstrating the necessity of a solution.
    • Perfection is impossible to achieve: during the course of their work, everyone encounters pain points. Identify those pain points to arrive at the problem that needs to be solved.

    Example:

    List of pains addressed by conversational commerce:

    • Search functions can be clunky and unresponsive.
    • Corporate websites can be difficult to navigate.
    • Customers are uncomfortable in unfamiliar internet environments.
    • Customers do not like waiting in a long queue to engage with customer service representatives when they have concerns.

    “If I were given one hour to solve a problem, I would spend 59 minutes defining the problem and one minute resolving it.”
    – Albert Einstein

    Input the results of this exercise into Section 1.1 of the Proof of Concept Template.

    3.1.C Identify jobs and stakeholders

    1 hour

    Jobs

    Job: Anything that the “customer” (the target of the solution) needs to get done but that is complicated by a pain.

    Examples:
    The job of the conversational commerce interface is to make selling products easier for the company.
    From the customer perspective, the job of the conversational interface is to make the act of purchasing a product simpler and easier.

    Stakeholders

    Stakeholder: Anyone who is impacted by the new technology and who will end up using, approving, or implementing it.

    Examples:
    The executive is responsible for changing the company’s direction and approving investment in a new sales platform.
    The IT team is responsible for implementing the new technology.
    Marketing will be responsible for selling the change to customers.
    Customers, the end users, will be the ones using the conversational commerce user interface.

    Input the results of this exercise into Section 1.2 of the Proof of Concept Template.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Process deconstruction reveals strengths and weaknesses. Promising technology should improve stakeholders’ abilities to do jobs.

    3.1.D Outline how disruptive technology will solve the problem

    1 hour

    How will the technology in question make jobs easier?

    • How will the disruptive technology you have elected to move forward with create gains for the organization?
    • First, identify the gains that are supposed to come with the project. Consider the benefits that the various stakeholders expect to derive from the jobs identified.
    • Second, make note of how the technology in question facilitates the gains you have noted. Be sure to articulate the exclusive features of the new technology that make it an improvement over the current state.

    Note: The goal of this exercise is to make the case for a particular technology. Sell it!

    Expected Gain: Increase in sales.

    Conversational Commerce’s Contribution: Customers are more likely to purchase products using interfaces they are comfortable with.

    Expected Gain: Decrease in costs.

    Conversational Commerce’s Contribution: Customers who are satisfied with the conversational interface are less likely to interact with live agents, saving labor costs.

    Input the results of this exercise into Section 1.3 of the Proof of Concept Template.

    3.1.E Map business processes

    1 hour

    Map the specific business processes the new technology will impact.

    • Disruptive technologies will impact a wide variety of business processes.
    • Map business processes to visualize what parts of your organization (departments, silos, divisions) will be impacted by the new technology, should it be adopted after the proof of concept.
    • Identify how the disruption will take place.
    • Demonstrate the value of each technology by including the results of the Disruptive Technology Value-Readiness and SWOT Analysis Tool with your process map.

    This image contains a screenshot of the Proof of concept project template

    Use the Proof of Concept Project Template to track the information you gather throughout Phase 3.

    3.1.F Identify affected business units

    30 minutes per technology

    Disruptive technology will impact business units.

    • Using the stakeholders identified earlier in the project, map each technology to the business units that will be affected.
    • Make your list exhaustive. While some technologies will have a limited impact on the business as a whole, others will have ripple effects throughout the organization.
    • Examine affected units at all scales: How will the technology impact operations at the team level? The department level? The division level?

    “The disruption is not just in the technology. Sometimes a good business model can be the disruptor.”
    – Jason Hong, Associate Professor, Carnegie Mellon

    Example:

    • Customer service teams: Conversational commerce will replace some of the duties of the customer service representative. They will have to reorganize to account for this development.
    • IT department: The IT department will be responsible for building/maintaining the conversational interface (or, more likely, they will be responsible for managing the contract with the vendor).
    • Sales analytics: New data from customers in natural language might provide a unique opportunity for the analytics team to develop new initiatives to drive sales growth.

    Input the results of this exercise into Section 2.1 of the Proof of Concept Template.

    3.1.G Outline and map the business processes likely to be disrupted

    15 minutes per technology

    Leverage the insights of the diverse working group.

    • Processes are designed to transform inputs into outputs. All business activities can be mapped into processes.
    • A process map illustrates the sequence of actions and decisions that transform an input into an output.
    • Effective mapping gives managers an “aerial” view of the company’s processes, making it easier to identify inefficiencies, reduce waste, and ultimately, streamline operations.
    • To identify business processes, have group members familiar with the affected business units identify how jobs are typically accomplished within those units.

    “To truly understand a business process, we need information from both the top-down and bottom-up points of view. Informants higher in the organizational hierarchy with a strategic focus are less likely to know process details or problems. But they might advocate and clearly articulate an end-to-end, customer-oriented philosophy that describes the process in an idealized form. Conversely, the salespeople, customer service representatives, order processors, shipping clerks, and others who actually carry out the processes will be experts about the processes, their associated documents, and problems or exception cases they encounter.”
    – Robert J. Glushko, Professor at UC Berkeley and Tim McGrath, Business Consultant

    Info-Tech Insight

    Opinions gathered from a group that reflect the process in question are far more likely to align with your organization’s reality. If you have any questions about a particular process, do not be afraid to go outside of the working group to ask someone who might know.

    3.1.G Outline and map the business processes likely to be disrupted (continued)

    15 minutes per technology

    Create a simple diagram of identified processes.

    • Use different shapes to identify different points in the process.
    • Rectangles represent actions, diamonds represent decisions.
    • On a whiteboard, map out the actions and decisions that take place to transform an input into an output.
    • Input the result into section 2.2 of the Proof of Concept Template.

    This image contains a screenshot of the Software Service Cross-Function Process tab from Edraw Visualization Solutions.

    Source: Edraw Visualization Solutions

    Example: simplified process map

    1. User: visits company website
    2. User: engages search function or browses links
    3. User: selects and purchases product from a menu
    4. Company: ships product to customer

    3.1.H Recognize how the new technology will impact business processes

    15 minutes per technology

    Using the information gleaned from the previous activities, develop a new process map that takes the new technology into account.

    Identify the new actions or decisions that the new technology will affect.

    User: visits company website; User: engages conversational; commerce platform; User: engages search function or browses links; User: makes a natural language query; User: selects and purchases product from a menu</p data-verified=

    User: selects and purchases product from a menu; Company: ships product to customer; Company: ships product to customer">

    Info-Tech Insight

    It’s ok to fail! The only way to know you’re getting close to the “knee of curve" is from multiple failed PoC tests. The more PoC options you have, the more likely it will be that you will have two to three successful results.

    3.1.I Make the case: Outline why the new business process is superior to the old

    15 minutes per technology

    Articulate the main benefits of the new process.

    • Using the revised process map, make the case for each new action.
    • Questions to consider: How does the new technology relieve end-user/customer pains? How does the new technology contribute to the streamlining of the business process? Who will benefit from the new action? What are the implications of those benefits?
    • Record the results of this exercise in section 2.4 of the Proof of Concept Template.

    This image contains an example of an outline comparing the benefits of new and the old business processes.

    Info-Tech Insight

    If you cannot articulate how a new technology will benefit a business process, reconsider moving forward with the proof-of-concept project.

    Phase 3: Evaluate

    Create an Action Plan to Exploit Disruptive Technologies

    Activities:

    Step 3.1: Create Process Maps
    Step 3.2: Develop Proof of Concept Charter

    Develop Proof of Concept Charter

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Core working group
    • Infrastructure Management
    • Working group leader
    • CIO

    Outcomes of this step:

    • Business process maps before and after disruption
    • Proof of concept charter
    • Key performance indicators
    • Estimation of required resources

    Step 3.2

    Develop Proof of Concept Charter

    Activities:

    1. Use SMART success metrics to define your objectives
    2. Develop key performance indicators (KPIs)
    3. Identify key success factors for the project
    4. Outline the project’s scope
    5. Identify the structure of the team responsible for the proof-of-concept project
    6. Estimate the resources required by the project
    7. Be aware of common IT project concerns
    8. Communicate your working group’s findings and successes to a wide audience
    9. Hand off the completed proof-of-concept project plan
    10. Disruption is constant: Repeat the evaluation process regularly to protect the business

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Working group leader
    • CIO

    Outcomes of this step:

    • Proof of concept charter
    • Key performance indicators
    • Estimation of required resources

    3.2 Develop a proof of concept charter

    Keep your proof of concept on track by defining five key dimensions.

    1. Objective: Giving an overview of the planned proof of concept will help to focus and clarify the rest of this section. What must the proof of concept achieve? Objectives should be: specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time bound. Outline and track key performance indicators.
    2. Key Success Factors: These are conditions that will positively impact the proof of concept’s success.
    3. Scope: High-level statement of scope. More specifically, state what is in scope and what is out of scope.
    4. Project Team: Identify the team’s structure, e.g. sponsors, subject-matter experts.
    5. Resource Estimation: Identify what resources (time, materials, space, tools, expertise, etc.) will be needed to build and socialize your prototype. How will they be secured?

    Input the results of this exercise into Section 3.0 of the Proof of Concept Template.

    3.2.A Use SMART success metrics to define your objectives

    Specific

    Measurable

    Actionable

    Realistic

    Time Bound

    Make sure the objective is clear and detailed.

    Objectives are measurable if there are specific metrics assigned to measure success. Metrics should be objective.

    Objectives become actionable when specific initiatives designed to achieve the objective are identified.

    Objectives must be achievable given your current resources or known available resources.

    An objective without a timeline can be put off indefinitely. Furthermore, measuring success is challenging without a timeline.

    Who, what, where, why?

    How will you measure the extent to which the goal is met?

    What is the action-oriented verb?

    Is this within my capabilities?

    By when: deadline, frequency?

    Examples:

    1. Increase in sales by $40,000 per month by the end of next quarter.
    2. Immediate increase in web traffic by 600 unique page views per day.
    3. Number of pilots approved per year.
    4. Number of successfully deployed solutions per year.

    Input the results of this exercise into Section 3.0 of the Proof of Concept Template.

    3.2.B Develop key performance indicators (KPIs)

    30 minutes per technology

    Key performance indicators allow for rigorous analysis, which generates insight into utilization by platform and consumption by business activity.

    • Use the process improvements identified in step 3.1 to brainstorm metrics that indicate when process improvement is actually taking place.
    • Have members of the group pitch KPIs; the facilitator should record each suggestion on a whiteboard.
    • Make sure to have everyone justify the inclusion of each metric: How does it relate to the improvement that the proof of concept project is intended to drive? How does it relate to the overall goals of the business?
    • Include a list of KPIs, along with a description and a target (ensuring that it aligns with SMART metrics) in section 3.1 of the Proof of Concept Template.

    “An estimated 70% of performance measurement systems fail after implementation. Carefully select your KPIs and avoid this trap!”
    Source: Collins et al. 2016

    Key Performance Indicator Description Target

    Result

    Conversion rate What percentage of customers who visit the site/open the conversational interface continue on to make a purchase? 40%
    Average order value

    How much does each customer spend per visit to the website?

    $212
    Repeat customer rate What percentage of customers have made more than one purchase over time? 65%
    Lifetime customer value Over the course of their interaction with the company, what is the typical value each customer brings? $1566

    Input the results of this exercise into Section 3.1 of the Proof of Concept Template.

    3.2.C Identify key success factors for the project

    30 minutes per technology

    Effective project management involves optimizing four key success factors (Clarke, 1999)

    • Communication: Communicate the expected changes to stakeholders, making sure that everyone who needs to know does know. Example: Make sure customer service representatives know their duties will be impacted by the conversational UI well before the proof-of-concept project begins.
    • Clarity: All involved in the project should be apprised of what the project is intended to accomplish and what the project is not intended to accomplish. Example: The conversational commerce project is not intended to be rolled out to the entire customer base all at once; it is not intended to disrupt normal online sales.
    • Compartmentalization: The working group should suggest some ways that the project can be broken down to facilitate its effective implementation. Example: Sales provides details of customers who might be amenable to a trial, IT secures a vendor, customer service writes a script.
    • Flexibility: The working group’s final output should not be treated as gospel. Ensure that the document can be altered to account for unexpected events. Example: The conversational commerce platform might drive sales of a particular product more than others, necessitating adjustments at the warehouse and shipping level.

    Input the results of this exercise into Section 3.0 of the Proof of Concept Template.

    3.2.D Outline the project’s scope

    10 minutes per technology

    Create a high-level outline of the project’s scope.

    • Questions to consider: Broadly speaking, what are the project’s goals? What is the desired future state? Where in the company will the project be rolled out? What are some of the company’s goals that the project is not designed to cover?
    • Be sure to avoid scope creep! Remember: The goal of the proof-of-concept project is to produce a minimum case for viability in a carefully defined area. Reserve a detailed accounting of costs and benefits for the post-proof-of-concept stage.
    • Example: The conversational user interface will only be rolled out in an e-commerce setting. Other business units (HR, for example) are beyond the scope of this particular project.

    “Although scope creep is not the only nemesis a project can have, it does tend to have the farthest reach. Without a properly defined project and/or allowing numerous changes along the way, a project can easily go over budget, miss the deadline, and wreak havoc on project success.”
    – University Alliance, Villanova University

    Input the results of this exercise into Section 3.0 of the Proof of Concept Template.

    3.2.E Identify the structure of the team responsible for the proof-of-concept project

    10 minutes per technology

    Brainstorm who will be involved in project implementation.

    • Refer back to the list of stakeholders identified in 3.1.a. Which stakeholders should be involved in implementing the proof-of-concept plan?
    • What business units do they represent?
    • Who should be accountable for the project? At a high level, sketch the roles of each of the participants. Who will be responsible for doing the work? Who will approve it? Who needs to be informed at every stage? Who are the company’s internal subject matter experts?

    Example

    Name/Title Role
    IT Manager Negotiate the contract for the software with vendor
    CMO Promote the conversational interface to customers

    Input the results of this exercise into Section 3.0 of the Proof of Concept Template.

    3.2.F Estimate the resources required by the project

    10 minutes per technology

    Time and Money

    • Recall: Costs can be operational, capital, or opportunity.
    • Revisit the Disruptive Technology Value-Readiness and SWOT Analysis Tool. Record the capital and operational expenses expected to be associated with each technology, and add detail where possible (use exact figures from particular vendors instead of percentages).
    • Write the names and titles of each expected participant in the project on a whiteboard. Next to each name, write the number of hours they are expected to devote to the project and include a rough estimate of the cost of their participation to the company. Use full-time employee equivalent (FTE measures) as a base.
    • Outline how other necessary resources (space, tools, expertise, etc.) will be secured.

    Example: Conversational Commerce

    • OpEx: $149/month + 2.9¢/transaction* (2,000 estimated transactions)
    • CapEx: $0!
    • IT Manager: 5 hours at $100/hour
    • IT Technician: 40 hours at $45/hour
    • CMO: 1 hour at $300/hour
    • Customer Service Representative: 10 hours at $35/hour
    • *Estimated total cost for a one-month proof-of-concept project: $3,157

    *This number is a sample taken from the vendor Rhombus

    Input the results of this exercise into Section 3.0 of the Proof of Concept Template.

    3.2.G Be aware of common IT project concerns

    Of projects that did not meet business expectations or were cancelled, how significant were the following issues?

    A bar graph is depicted, comparing small, medium, and large businesses for the following datasets: Over budget; Project failed to be delivered on time; Breach of scope; Low quality; Failed to deliver expected benefit or value

    This survey data did not specifically address innovation projects.

    • Disruptive technology projects will be under increased scrutiny in comparison to other projects.
    • Be sure to meet deadlines and stay within budget.
    • Be cognizant that your projects can go out of scope, and there will be projects that may have to be cancelled due to low quality. Remember: Even a failed test is a learning opportunity!

    Info-Tech’s CIO-CEO Alignment Survey, N=225

    Organization size was determined by the number of IT employees within the organization

    Small = 10 or fewer IT staff, medium = 11 to 25 IT staff, and large/enterprise = 26 or greater IT staff

    3.2.H Communicate your working group’s findings and successes to a wide audience

    Advertise the group’s successes and help prevent airline magazine syndrome from occurring.

    • Share your group’s results internally:
      • Run your own analysis by senior management and then share it across the organization.
      • Maintain a list of technologies that the working group has analyzed and solicit feedback from the wider organization.
      • Post summaries of the technologies in a publicly available repository. The C-suite may not read it right away, but it will be easy to provide when they ask.
      • If senior management has declined to proceed with a certain technology, avoid wasting time and resources on it. However, include notes about why the technology was rejected.
    • These postings will also act as an advertisement for the group. Use the garnered interest to attract visionaries for the next cycle.
    • These postings will help to reiterate the innovative value of the IT department and help bring you to the decision-making table.

    “Some CIOs will have to battle the bias that they belong in the back office and shouldn’t be included in product architecture planning. CIOs must ‘sell’ IT’s strength in information architecture.”
    – Chris Curran, Chief Technologist, PwC (Curran, 2014)

    Info-Tech Insight

    Cast a wide net. By sharing your results with as many people as possible within your organization, you’ll not only attract more attention to your working group, but you will also get more feedback and ideas.

    3.2.I Hand off the completed proof-of-concept project plan

    The proof of concept template is filled out – now what?

    • The core working group is responsible for producing a vision of the future and outlining new technology’s disruptive potential. The actual implementation of the proof of concept (purchasing the hardware, negotiating the SLA with the vendor) is beyond the working group’s responsibilities.
    • If the proof of concept goes ahead, the facilitator should block some time to evaluate the completed project against the key performance indicators identified in the initial plan.
    • A cure for airline magazine syndrome: Be prepared when executives ask about new technology. Present them with the results of the shortlist analysis and the proof-of-concept plan. A clear accounting of the value, readiness, strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats posed by each technology, along with its impact on business processes, is an invaluable weapon against poor technology choices.

    Use section 3.2.b to identify the decision-making stakeholder who has the most to gain from a successful proof-of-concept project. Self-interest is a powerful motivator – the project is more likely to succeed in the hands of a passionate champion.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Set a date for the first meeting of the new iteration of the disruptive technology working group before the last meeting is done. Don’t risk pushing it back indefinitely.

    3.2.J Hand off the completed proof-of-concept project plan

    Record the results of the proof of concept. Keep track of what worked and what didn’t.

    Repeat the process regularly.

    • Finalize the proof of concept template, but don’t stop there: Keep your ear to the ground; follow tech developments using the sources identified in step 1.2.
    • Continue expanding the potential longlist with independent research: Be prepared to expand your longlist. Remember, the more technologies you have on the longlist, the more potential airline magazine syndrome cures you have access to.
    • Have the results of the previous session’s proof of concept plan on hand: At the start of each new iteration, conduct a review. What technologies were successful beyond the proof of concept phase? Which parts of the process worked? Which parts did not? How could they be improved?

    Info-Tech Insight

    The key is in anticipation. This is not a one-and-done exercise. Technology innovation operates at a faster pace than ever before, well below the Moores Law "18 month" timeline as an example. Success is in making EDIT a repeatable process.

    Related Info-Tech Research

    Define Your Digital Business Strategy
    After a major crisis, find your place in the digital economy.

    Develop a Project Portfolio Management Strategy
    Drive project throughput by throttling resource capacity.

    Adopt Design Thinking in Your Organization
    Innovation needs design thinking.

    Digital Maturity Improvement Service
    Prepare your organization for digital transformation – or risk falling behind.

    Research contributors and experts

    Nitin Babel

    Nitin Babel, Co-Founder, niki.ai

    Nitin Babel, MSc, co-created conversational commerce platform niki.ai in early 2015. Since then, the technology has been featured on the front page of the Economic Times, and has secured the backing of Ratan Tata, former chairman of the Tata Group, one of the largest companies in the world.

    Mark Hubbard

    Mark Hubbard, Senior Vice President, FirstOnSite

    Mark is the SVP for Information Technology in Canada with FirstOnSite, a full service disaster recovery and property restoration company. Mark has over 25 years of technology leadership guiding global organizations through the development of strategic and tactical plans to strengthen their technology platforms and implement business aligned technology strategies.

    Chris Green

    Chris Green, Enterprise Architect, Boston Private
    Chris is an IT architect with over 15 years’ experience designing, building, and implementing solutions. He is a results-driven leader and contributor, skilled in a broad set of methods, tools, and platforms. He is experienced with mobile, web, enterprise application integration, business process, and data design.

    Andrew Kope

    Andrew Kope, Head of Data Analytics
    Big Blue Bubble
    Andrew Kope, MSc, oversees a team that develops and maintains a user acquisition tracking solution and a real-time metrics dashboard. He also provides actionable recommendations to the executive leadership of Big Blue Bubble – one of Canada’s largest independent mobile game development studios.

    Jason Hong

    Jason Hong, Associate Professor, School of Computer Science, Human-Computer Interaction Institute, Carnegie Mellon University

    Jason Hong is a member of the faculty at Carnegie Mellon’s School of Computer Science. His research focus lies at the intersection of human-computer interaction, privacy and security, and systems. He is a New America National Cyber Security Fellow (2015-2017) and is widely published in academic and industry journals.

    Tim Lalonde

    Tim Lalonde, Vice President, Mid-Range

    Tim Lalonde is the VP of Technical Operations at Mid-Range. He works with leading-edge companies to be more competitive and effective in their industries. He specializes in developing business roadmaps leveraging technology that create and support change from within — with a focus on business process re-engineering, architecture and design, business case development and problem-solving. With over 30 years of experience in IT, Tim’s guiding principle remains simple: See a problem, fix a problem.

    Jon Mavor

    Jon Mavor, Co-Founder and CTO, Envelop VR
    Jon Mavor is a programmer and entrepreneur, whose past work includes writing the graphics engine for the PC game Total Annihilation. As Chief Technology Officer of Envelop VR, a virtual reality start-up focused on software for the enterprise, Jon has overseen the launch of Envelop for Windows’s first public beta.

    Dan Pitt

    Dan Pitt, President, Palo Alto Innovation Advisors
    Dan Pitt is a network architect who has extensive experience in both the academy and industry. Over the course of his career, Dan has served as Executive Director of the Open Networking Foundation, Dean of Engineering at Santa Clara University, Vice President of Technology and Academic Partnerships at Nortel, Vice President of the Architecture Lab at Bay Networks, and, currently, as President of Palo Alto Innovation Advisors, where he advises and serves as an executive for technology start-ups in the Palo Alto area and around the world.

    Courtney Smith

    Courtney Smith, Co-Founder, Executive Creative Director
    PureMatter

    Courtney Smith is an accomplished creative strategist, storyteller, writer, and designer. Under her leadership, PureMatter has earned hundreds of creative awards and been featured in the PRINT International Design Annual. Courtney has juried over 30 creative competitions, including Creativity International. She is an invited member of the Academy of Interactive and Visual Arts.

    Emmanuel Tsekleves

    Emmanuel Tsekleves, Senior Lecturer in Design Interactions, University of Lancaster
    Dr. Emmanuel Tsekleves is a senior lecturer and writer based out of the United Kingdom. Emmanuel designs interactions between people, places, and products by forging creative design methods along with digital technology. His design-led research in the areas of health, ageing, well-being, and defence has generated public interest and attracted media attention by the national press, such as the Daily Mail, Daily Mirror, The Times, the Daily Mail, Discovery News, and several other international online media outlets.

    Bibliography

    Airini Ab Rahman. “Emerging Technologies with Emerging Effects; A Review”. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. PERINTIS eJournal, June 2017. Web.

    Anthony, Scott. “Kodak’s Downfall Wasn’t About Technology.” Harvard Business Review, 15 July 2016. Web.

    ARM. The Intelligent Flexible Cloud. 26 Feb. 2015. Web.

    Association of Computing Machinery. Communications of the ACM, n.d. Web.

    Barnett, Thomas. “Three Mobile Trends to Watch.” Cisco Blogs, 3 Feb. 2015. Web.

    Batelle, John. “The 70 Percent Solution.” CNN, 1 Dec 2005. Web.

    Booz Allen Hamilton. Managing Technological Change: 7 Ways to Talk Tech with Management, n.d. Web.

    Brynjolfsson, Erik, and Andrew McAfee. The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. W. W. Norton, 2014. Print.

    Christensen, Clayton M. “What is Disruptive Innovation?” Harvard Business Review, Dec 2015. Web.

    Christensen, Clayton M. and James Euchner. “Managing Disruption: An Interview With Clayton Christensen.” Research-Technology Management, 22 Dec 2015. vol. 54, no. 1. Web.

    Christensen, Clayton M., Rory McDonald, and Elizabeth J. Altman. “Disruptive Innovation: An Intellectual History and Directions for Future Research”. Wiley Online Library. Web.

    Christensen, Clayton M., Taddy Hall, Karen Dillon, and David S. Duncan. “Know Your Customers’ Jobs to be Done.” Harvard Business Review, Sept. 2016. Web.

    Cisco. “Cisco Annual Internet Report.” n.d. Web.

    Cisco. Cisco Visual Networking Index: Forecast and Methodology, 2014-2019, 27 May 2015. Web.

    Clark, Steven. “Elon Musk hopes SpaceX will send humans to Mars in 2024.” Spaceflight Now, 2 June 2016. Web.

    Clarke, Angela. “A practical use of key success factors to improve the effectiveness of project management,” International Journal of Project Management, June 1999 (17): 139-145.

    Collins, Andrew L., Patrick Hester, Barry Ezell, and John Horst. “An improvement selection methodology for key performance indicators.” Environmental Systems and Decisions, June 2016, 36 (2): 196-208.

    Computer Sciences Corporation. CSC Global CIO Survey: 2014-2015: CIOs Emerge as Disruptive Innovators: An Annual Barometer of Global CIOs’ Plans, Priorities, Threats, and Opportunities, 2014. Web.

    Constine, John. “Voice is Chat’s Next Battleground.” TechCrunch, 19 Sept. 2016. Web.

    Cressman, Daryl. “Disruptive Innovation and the Idea of Technology”. Maastricht University, June 2019. Web.

    Crown Prosecution Service. A Guide to Process Mapping and Improvement. n.d. Web.

    Curran, Chris. “The CIO’s Role in the Internet of Things.” PwC, 13 Mar. 2014. Web.

    Darbha, Sheta, Mike Shevenell, and Jason Normandin. “Impact of Software-Defined Networking on Infrastructure Management.” CA Technology Exchange, 4.3, Nov. 2013, pp. 33-43. Web.

    Denecken, Sven. Conquering Disruption Through Digital Transformation: Technologies, Leadership Strategies, and Best Practices to Create Opportunities for Innovation. SAP, 2014. Web.

    DHL Trend Research and Cisco Consulting Services. Internet of Things in Logistics: A Collaborative Report by DHL and Cisco on Implications and Use Cases for the Logistics Industry, 2015. Web.

    Dirican, Cüneyt. “The Impacts of Robotics, Artificial Intelligence on Business and Economics.” Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 195, 2015, pp. 564-573. Web.

    Edraw Visualization Solutions. Examples of Flowcharts, Org Charts and More. “Cross-Function Flowchart Examples – Service Flowchart.”

    Emerson. Data Center 2025: Exploring the Possibilities, 2014. Web.

    Ericsson. Next-Generation Data Center Infrastructure, Feb. 2015. Web.

    Eurotech. Connecting M2M Applications to the Cloud to Bolster Hardware Sales, 2014. Web.

    Evans Gary, Llewellyn. “Disruptive Technology and the Board: The Tip of the Iceberg”. Economics and Business Review, n.d. Web.

    Evans Gary, Llewellyn. “Disruptive Technology and the Board: The Tip of the Iceberg”. Economics and Business Review, n.d. Web.

    Gage, Deborah. “The Venture Capital Secret: 3 Out of 4 Start-Ups Fail.” Wall Street Journal, 20 Sept. 2012. Web.

    Garvin, David A. “Competing on the Eight Dimensions of Quality.” Harvard Business Review, November 1987. Web.

    Gibbs, Colin. Augmented Reality in the Enterprise: Opportunities and Challenges. Gigaom Research, 26 Jan. 2015. Web.

    Glushko, Robert J. and Tim McGrath. Document Engineering: Analyzing and Designing Documents for Business Informatics and Web Services. MIT Press, 2005.

    Hadfield, Tom. “Facebook’s Messenger Bot Store could be the most important launch since the App Store.” TechCrunch, 17 March 2016. Web.

    Healey, Nic. “Microsoft's mixed reality vision: 80 million devices by 2020.” CNET, 1 June 2016. Web.

    Hewlett-Packard. Go Beyond Cost Reduction: Use Robotic Process Automation, Oct. 2015. Web.

    Hewlett-Packard. HP Composable Infrastructure: Bridging Traditional IT with the New Style of Business, June 2015. Web.

    Hewlett-Packard. HP Labs, n.d. Web.

    Hong, Jason. “Inside the Great Wall.” Communications of the ACM, 25 May 2016. Web.

    IBM Institute for Value. Your Cognitive Future: How Next-Gen Computing Changes the Way We Live and Work, 2015. Web.

    IBM. A New Way to Work: Futurist Insights to 2025 and Beyond, Jan. 2015. Web.

    Infinity. The Evolution of the Data Centre [sic], 2015. Web.

    Intel Corporation. Intel Annual Report, 1997. Web.

    Isaac, Mike. “Facebook Bets on Bots for its Messenger App.” New York Times, 12 April 2016. Web.

    ISACA. COBIT 5: Enabling Processes. ISACA, 2012. Print.

    K-12 Blueprint. “Planning a Proof of Concept.” 2014. Web.

    Kaushik Rukmini, Meenakshi. “The Impact of Pandemic COVID -19 in Workplace.” European Journal of Business Management and Research, May 2020. Web.

    Knight, Will. “Conversational Interfaces Powerful speech technology from China’s leading Internet company makes it much easier to use a smartphone.” MIT Technology Review, n.d. Web.

    Kostoff, Ronald N., Robert Boylan, and Gene R. Simons. “Disruptive Technology Roadmaps.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2004. Vol. 71. Web.

    Kurzweil, Ray. “The Accelerating Power of Technology.” TED, Feb. 2005. Web.

    Kurzweil, Ray. Kurzweil: Accelerating Intelligence, 2015. Web.

    MacFarquhar, Larissa. “When Giants Fall: What Business Has Learned From Clayton Christensen,” New Yorker, 14 May 2012. Web.

    McClintock, Cat. “2016: The Year for Augmented Reality in the Enterprise.” PTC, n.d. Web.

    McKinsey & Company. IT Growth and Global Change: A Conversation with Ray Kurzweil. 29 Feb. 2012, YouTube. Web.

    Messina, Chris. “2016 Will be the Year of Conversational Commerce.” Medium, 19 Jan 2016. Web.

    Microsoft. Microsoft Research, n.d. Web.

    Miller, Ron. “Forget the Apple Watch, Think Drones in the Enterprise.” TechCrunch, 10 Sep. 2015. Web.

    Nokia Networks. FutureWorks [sic]: Teaching Networks to be Self-Aware: Technology Vision 2020. 2014. Web.

    Nokia Networks. Internet of Things. n.d. Web.

    O’Reilly, Charles, and Andrew J. M. Binns, “The Three Stages of Disruptive Innovation: Idea Generation, Incubation, and Scaling”. Sage Journals, n.d. Web.

    Pew Research Center. AI, Robotics, and the Future of Jobs: Experts Envision Automation and Intelligent Digital Agents Permeating Vast Areas of Our Work and Personal Lives by 2025, but they are Divided on Whether these Advances will Displace More Jobs than they Create. Aug. 2014. Web.

    Ramiller, Neil. “Airline Magazine Syndrome: Reading a Myth of Mismanagement.” Information Technology & People, Sept 2001. Print.

    Raymond James & Associates. The Internet of Things: A Study in Hype, Reality, Disruption, and Growth. 2014. Web.

    Richter, Felix. “No Growth in Sight for Global PC Market.” Statista, 14 March 2016. Web.

    Roy, Mekhala. “4 Examples of Digital Transformation Success in Business”. TechTarget, n.d. Web.

    Simon Weinreich, “How to Manage Disruptive Innovation - a conceptional methodology for value-oriented portfolio planning,” Sciencedirect. 31st CIRP Design Conference 2021.

    Spice Works. The Devices are Coming! How the “Internet of Things” will affect IT… and why resistance is futile. May 2014. Web.

    Spradlin, Dwayne. “Are You Solving the Right Problem?” Harvard Business Review, Sept. 2012. Web.

    Statista. “Number of smartphones sold to end users worldwide from 2007 to 2015 (in million units).” N.d. Web.

    Statista. “Worldwide tablet shipments from 2nd quarter 2010 to 2nd quarter 2016 (in million units).” N.d. Web.

    Sven Schimpf, “Disruptive Field Study; How Companies Identify, Evaluate, Develop and Implement Disruptive Technologies.” Fraunhofer Group for Innovation Research, 2020. Web.

    Tsekleves, Emmanuel. “Science fiction as fact: how desires drive discoveries.” The Guardian. 13 Aug. 2015. Web.

    Tsekleves, Emmanuel. “Science fiction as fact: how desires drive discoveries.” The Guardian, 13 Aug. 2015. Web.

    United States Department of Transportation. “National Motor Vehicle Crash Causation Survey: Report to Congress.” National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, July 2008. Web.

    United States Department of Transportation. “National Motor Vehicle Crash Causation Survey: Report to Congress.” National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, July 2008. Web.

    University Alliance (Villanova U). Managing Scope Creep in Project Management. N.d. Web.

    Vavoula, Giasemi N., and Mike Sharples. “Future Technology Workshop: A Collaborative Method for the Design of New Learning Technologies and Activities.” International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, Dec 2007. Vol. 2 no. 4. Web.

    Walraven Pieter. “It’s Operating Systems Vs. Messaging Apps In The Battle For Tech’s Next Frontier.” TechCrunch, 11 Aug 2015. Web.

    Webb, Amy. “The Tech Trends You Can’t Ignore in 2015.” Harvard Business Review, 5 Jan. 2015. Web.

    Wenger, Albert. “The Great Bot Rush of 2015-16.” Continuations, 16 Dec 2015. Web.

    White, Chris. “IoT Tipping Point Propels Digital Experience Era.” Cisco Blogs, 12 Nov. 2014. Web.

    World Economic Forum and Accenture. Industrial Internet of Things: Unleashing the Potential of Connected Products and Services. 2015. Web.

    Yu Dan and Hang Chang Chieh, "A reflective review of disruptive innovation theory," PICMET '08 - 2008 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology, 2008, pp. 402-414, doi: 10.1109/PICMET.2008.4599648.

    Standardize the Service Desk

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}477|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.5/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $24,155 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 24 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Service Desk
    • Parent Category Link: /service-desk
    • Not everyone embraces their role in service support. Specialists would rather work on projects than provide service support.
    • The Service Desk lacks processes and workflows to provide consistent service. Service desk managers struggle to set and meet service-level expectations, which further compromises end-user satisfaction.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Service desk improvement is an exercise in organizational change. Engage specialists across the IT organization in building the solution. Establish a single service-support team across the IT group and enforce it with a cooperative, customer-focused culture.
    • Don’t be fooled by a tool that’s new. A new service desk tool alone won’t solve the problem. Service desk maturity improvements depend on putting in place the right people and processes to support the technology.

    Impact and Result

    • Create a consistent customer service experience for service desk patrons, and increase efficiency, first-call resolution, and end-user satisfaction with the Service Desk.
    • Decrease time and cost to resolve service desk tickets.
    • Understand and address reporting needs to address root causes and measure success and build a solid foundation for future IT service improvements.

    Standardize the Service Desk Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Standardize the Service Desk Research – A step-by-step document that helps you improve customer service by driving consistency in your support approach and meet SLAs.

    Use this blueprint to standardize your service desk by assessing your current capability and laying the foundations for your service desk, design an effective incident management workflow, design a request fulfillment process, and apply the discussions and activities to make an actionable plan for improving your service desk.

    • Standardize the Service Desk – Phases 1-4

    2. Service Desk Maturity Assessment – An assessment tool to help guide process improvement efforts and track progress.

    This tool is designed to assess your service desk process maturity, identify gaps, guide improvement efforts, and measure your progress.

    • Service Desk Maturity Assessment

    3. Service Desk Project Summary – A template to help you organize process improvement initiatives using examples.

    Use this template to organize information about the service desk challenges that the organization is facing, make the case to build a right-sized service desk to address those challenges, and outline the recommended process changes.

    • Service Desk Project Summary

    4. Service Desk Roles and Responsibilities Guide – An analysis tool to determine the right roles and build ownership.

    Use the RACI template to determine roles for your service desk initiatives and to build ownership around them. Use the template and replace it with your organization's information.

    • Service Desk Roles and Responsibilities Guide

    5. Incident Management and Service Desk Standard Operating Procedure – A template designed to help service managers kick-start the standardization of service desk processes.

    The template will help you identify service desk roles and responsibilities, build ticket management processes, put in place sustainable knowledgebase practices, document ticket prioritization scheme and SLO, and document ticket workflows.

    • Incident Management and Service Desk SOP

    6. Ticket and Call Quality Assessment Tool – An assessment tool to check in on ticket and call quality quarterly and improve the quality of service desk data.

    Use this tool to help review the quality of tickets handled by agents and discuss each technician's technical capabilities to handle tickets.

    • Ticket and Call Quality Assessment Tool

    7. Workflow Library – A repository of typical workflows.

    The Workflow Library provides examples of typical workflows that make up the bulk of the incident management and request fulfillment processes at the service desk.

    • Incident Management and Service Desk Workflows (Visio)
    • Incident Management and Service Desk Workflows (PDF)

    8. Service Desk Ticket Categorization Schemes – A repository of ticket categories.

    The Ticket Categorization Schemes provide examples of ticket categories to organize the data in the service desk tool and produce reports that help managers manage the service desk and meet business requirements.

    • Service Desk Ticket Categorization Schemes

    9. Knowledge Manager – A job description template that includes a detailed explication of the responsibilities and expectations of a Knowledge Manager role.

    The Knowledge Manager's role is to collect, synthesize, organize, and manage corporate information in support of business units across the enterprise.

    • Knowledge Manager

    10. Knowledgebase Article Template – A comprehensive record of the incident management process.

    An accurate and comprehensive record of the incident management process, including a description of the incident, any workarounds identified, the root cause (if available), and the profile of the incident's source, will improve incident resolution time.

    • Knowledgebase Article Template

    11. Sample Communication Plan – A sample template to guide your communications around the integration and implementation of your overall service desk improvement initiatives.

    Use this template to develop a communication plan that outlines what stakeholders can expect as the process improvements recommended in the Standardize the Service Desk blueprint are implemented.

    • Sample Communication Plan

    12. Service Desk Roadmap – A structured roadmap tool to help build your service desk initiatives timeline.

    The Service Desk Roadmap helps track outstanding implementation activities from your service desk standardization project. Use the roadmap tool to define service desk project tasks, their owners, priorities, and timeline.

    • Service Desk Roadmap
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Standardize the Service Desk

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Lay Service Desk Foundations

    The Purpose

    Discover your challenges and understand what roles, metrics, and ticket handling procedures are needed to tackle the challenges.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Set a clear understanding about the importance of service desk to your organization and service desk best practices.

    Activities

    1.1 Assess current state of the service desk.

    1.2 Review service desk and shift-left strategy.

    1.3 Identify service desk metrics and reports.

    1.4 Identify ticket handling procedures

    Outputs

    Current state assessment

    Shift-left strategy and implications

    Service desk metrics and reports

    Ticket handling procedures

    2 Design Incident Management

    The Purpose

    Build workflows for incident and critical incident tickets.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Distinguish incidents from service requests.

    Ticket categorization facilitates ticket. routing and reporting.

    Develop an SLA for your service desk team for a consistent service delivery.

    Activities

    2.1 Build incident and critical incident management workflows.

    2.2 Design ticket categorization scheme and proper ticket handling guidelines.

    2.3 Design incident escalation and prioritization guidelines.

    Outputs

    Incident and critical incident management workflows

    Ticket categorization scheme

    Ticket escalation and prioritization guidelines

    3 Design Request Fulfilment

    The Purpose

    Build service request workflows and prepare self-service portal.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Standardize request fulfilment processes.

    Prepare for better knowledge management and leverage self-service portal to facilitate shift-left strategy.

    Activities

    3.1 Build service request workflows.

    3.2 Build a targeted knowledgebase.

    3.3 Prepare for a self-serve portal project.

    Outputs

    Distinguishing criteria for requests and projects

    Service request workflows and SLAs

    Knowledgebase article template, processes, and workflows

    4 Build Project Implementation Plan

    The Purpose

    Now that you have laid the foundation of your service desk, put all the initiatives into an action plan.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Discuss priorities, set timeline, and identify effort for your service desk.

    Identify the benefits and impacts of communicating service desk initiatives to stakeholders and define channels to communicate service desk changes.

    Activities

    4.1 Build an implementation roadmap.

    4.2 Build a communication plan

    Outputs

    Project implementation and task list with associated owners

    Project communication plan and workshop summary presentation

    Further reading

    Analyst Perspective

    "Customer service issues are rarely based on personality but are almost always a symptom of poor and inconsistent process. When service desk managers are looking to hire to resolve customer service issues and executives are pushing back, it’s time to look at improving process and the support strategy to make the best use of technicians’ time, tools, and knowledge sharing. Once improvements have been made, it’s easier to make the case to add people or introduce automation.

    Replacing service desk solutions will also highlight issues around poor process. Without fixing the baseline services, the new solution will simply wrap your issues in a prettier package.

    Ultimately, the service desk needs to be the entry point for users to get help and the rest of IT needs to provide the appropriate support to ensure the first line of interaction has the knowledge and tools they need to resolve quickly and preferably on first contact. If your plans include optimization to self-serve or automation, you’ll have a hard time getting there without standardizing first."

    Sandi Conrad

    Principal Research Director, Infrastructure & Operations Practice

    Info-Tech Research Group

    A method for getting your service desk out of firefighter mode

    This Research Is Designed For:

    • The CIO and senior IT management who need to increase service desk effectiveness and timeliness and improve end-user satisfaction.
    • The service desk manager who wants to lead the team from firefighting mode to providing consistent and proactive support.

    This Research Will Also Assist:

    • Service desk teams who want to increase their own effectiveness and move from a help desk to a service desk.
    • Infrastructure and applications managers who want to decrease reactive support activities and increase strategic project productivity by shifting repetitive and low-value work left.

    This Research Will Help You:

    • Create a consistent customer service experience for service desk patrons.
    • Increase efficiency, first-call resolution, and end-user satisfaction with the Service Desk.
    • Decrease time and cost to resolve service desk tickets.
    • Understand and address reporting needs to address root causes and measure success.
    • Build a solid foundation for future IT service improvements.

    Executive Summary

    Situation

    • The CIO and senior IT management who need to increase service desk effectiveness and timeliness and improve end-user satisfaction.
    • If only the phone could stop ringing, the Service Desk could become proactive, address service levels, and improve end-user IT satisfaction.

    Complication

    • Not everyone embraces their role in service support. Specialists would rather work on projects than provide service support.
    • The Service Desk lacks processes and workflows to provide consistent service. Service desk managers struggle to set and meet service-level expectations, which further compromises end-user satisfaction.

    Resolution

    • Go beyond the blind adoption of best-practice frameworks. No simple formula exists for improving service desk maturity. Use diagnostic tools to assess the current state of the Service Desk. Identify service support challenges and draw on best-practice frameworks intelligently to build a structured response to those challenges.
    • An effective service desk must be built on the right foundations. Understand how:
      • Service desk structure affects cost and ticket volume capacity.
      • Incident management workflows can improve ticket handling, prioritization, and escalation.
      • Request fulfillment processes create opportunities for streamlining and automating services.
      • Knowledge sharing supports the processes and workflows essential to effective service support.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Service desk improvement is an exercise in organizational change. Engage specialists across the IT organization in building the solution. Establish a single service-support team across the IT group and enforce it with a cooperative, customer-focused culture. Don’t be fooled by a tool that’s new. A new service desk tool alone won’t solve the problem. Service desk maturity improvements depend on putting in place the right people and processes to support the technology

    Directors and executives understand the importance of the service desk and believe IT can do better

    A double bar graph is depicted. The blue bars represent Effectiveness and the green bars represent Importance in terms of service desk at different seniority levels, which include frontline, manager, director, and executive.

    Source: Info-Tech, 2019 Responses (N=189 organizations)

    Service Desk Importance Scores

      No Importance: 1.0-6.9
      Limited Importance: 7.0-7.9
      Significant Importance: 8.0-8.9
      Critical Importance: 9.0-10.0

    Service Desk Effectiveness Scores

      Not in Place: N/A
      Not Effective: 0.0-4.9
      Somewhat Ineffective: 5.0-5.9
      Somewhat Effective: 6.0-6.9
      Very Effective: 7.0-10.0

    Info-Tech Research Group’s IT Management and Governance Diagnostic (MGD) program assesses the importance and effectiveness of core IT processes. Since its inception, the MGD has consistently identified the service desk as an area to leverage.

    Business stakeholders consistently rank the service desk as one of the top five most important services that IT provides

    Since 2013, Info-Tech has surveyed over 40,000 business stakeholders as part of our CIO Business Vision program.

    Business stakeholders ranked the following 12 core IT services in terms of importance:

    Learn more about the CIO Business Vision Program.
    *Note: IT Security was added to CIO Business Vision 2.0 in 2019

    Top IT Services for Business Stakeholders

    1. Network Infrastructure
    2. IT Security*
    3. Data Quality
    4. Service Desk
    5. Business Applications
    6. Devices
    7. Client-Facing Technology
    8. Analytical Capability
    9. IT Innovation Leadership
    10. Projects
    11. Work Orders
    12. IT Policies
    13. Requirements Gathering
    Source: Info-Tech Research Group, 2019 (N=224 organizations)

    Having an effective and timely service desk correlates with higher end-user satisfaction with all other IT services

    A double bar graph is depicted. The blue bar represents dissatisfied ender user, and the green bar represents satisfied end user. The bars show the average of dissatisfied and satisfied end users for service desk effectiveness and service desk timeliness.

    On average, organizations that were satisfied with service desk effectiveness rated all other IT processes 46% higher than dissatisfied end users.

    Organizations that were satisfied with service desk timeliness rated all other IT processes 37% higher than dissatisfied end users.
    “Satisfied” organizations had average scores =8.“Dissatisfied" organizations had average scores “Dissatisfied" organizations had average scores =6. Source: Info-Tech Research Group, 2019 (N=18,500+ respondents from 75 organizations)

    Standardize the service desk the Info-Tech way to get measurable results

    More than one hundred organizations engaged with Info-Tech, through advisory calls and workshops, for their service desk projects in 2016. Their goal was either to improve an existing service desk or build one from scratch.

    Organizations that estimate the business impact of each project phase help us shed light on the average measured value of the engagements.

    "The analysts are an amazing resource for this project. Their approach is very methodical, and they have the ability to fill in the big picture with detailed, actionable steps. There is a real opportunity for us to get off the treadmill and make real IT service management improvements"

    - Rod Gula, IT Director

    American Realty Advisors

    Three circles are depicted. The top circle shows the sum of measured value dollar impact which is US$1,659,493.37. The middle circle shows the average measured value dollar impact which is US$19,755.87. The bottom circle shows the average measured value time saved which is 27 days.

    Info-Tech’s approach to service desk standardization focuses on building service management essentials

    This image depicts all of the phases and steps in this blueprint.

    Info-Tech draws on the COBIT framework, which focuses on consistent delivery of IT services across the organization

    This image depicts research that can be used to improve IT processes. Service Desk is circled to demonstrate which research is being used.

    The service desk is the foundation of all other service management processes.

    The image shows how the service desk is a foundation for other service management processes.

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    “Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful.”

    Guided Implementation

    “Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track.”

    Workshop

    “We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place.”

    Consulting

    “Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project.”

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

    Standardize the Service Desk – project overview

    This image shows the project overview of this blueprint.

    Info-Tech delivers: Use our tools and templates to accelerate your project to completion

    Project Summary

    Image of template.

    Service Desk Standard Operating Procedures

    Image of tool.

    Service Desk Maturity Assessment Tool

    Image of tool.

    Service Desk Implementation Roadmap

    Image of tool Incident, knowledge, and request management workflows

    Incident, knowledge, and request management workflows

    The project’s key deliverable is a service desk standard operating procedure

    Benefits of documented SOPs:

    Improved training and knowledge transfer: Routine tasks can be delegated to junior staff (freeing senior staff to work on higher priority tasks).

    IT automation, process optimization, and consistent operations: Defining, documenting, and then optimizing processes enables IT automation to be built on sound processes, so consistent positive results can be achieved.

    Compliance: Compliance audits are more manageable because the documentation is already in place.

    Transparency: Visually documented processes answer the common business question of “why does that take so long?”

    Cost savings: Work solved at first contact or with a minimal number of escalations will result in greater efficiency and more cost-effective support. This will also lead to better customer service.

    Impact of undocumented/undefined SOPs:

    Tasks will be difficult to delegate, key staff become a bottleneck, knowledge transfer is inconsistent, and there is a longer onboarding process for new staff

    IT automation built on poorly defined, unoptimized processes leads to inconsistent results.

    Documenting SOPs to prepare for an audit becomes a major time-intensive project.

    Other areas of the organization may not understand how IT operates, which can lead to confusion and unrealistic expectations.

    Support costs are highest through inefficient processes, and proactive work becomes more difficult to schedule, making the organization vulnerable to costly disruptions.

    Workshop Overview

    Image depicts workshop overview occurring over four days.

    Contact your account representative or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Phase 1

    Lay Service Desk Foundations

    Step 1.1:Assess current state

    Image shows the steps in phase 1. Highlight is on step 1.1

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • 1.1.1 Outline service desk challenges
    • 1.1.2 Assess the service desk maturity

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Project Sponsor
    • IT Director, CIO
    • IT Managers and Service Desk Manager(s)
    • Representation from tier 2 and tier 3 specialists

    Outcomes

    Alignment on the challenges that the service desk faces, an assessment of the current state of service desk processes and technologies, and baseline metrics against which to measure improvements.

    Deliverables

    • Service Desk Maturity Assessment

    Standardizing the service desk benefits the whole business

    The image depicts 3 circles to represent the service desk foundations.

    Embrace standardization

    • Standardization prevents wasted energy on reinventing solutions to recurring issues.
    • Standardized processes are scalable so that process maturity increases with the size of your organization.

    Increase business satisfaction

    • Improve confidence that the service desk can meet service levels.
    • Create a single point of contact for incidents and requests and escalate quickly.
    • Analyze trends to forecast and meet shifting business requirements.

    Reduce recurring issues

    • Create tickets for every task and categorize them accurately.
    • Generate reliable data to support root-cause analysis.

    Increase efficiency and lower operating costs

    • Empower end users and technicians with a targeted knowledgebase (KB).
    • Cross-train to improve service consistency.

    Case Study: The CIO of Westminster College took stock of existing processes before moving to empower the “helpless desk”

    Scott Lowe helped a small staff of eight IT professionals formalize service desk processes and increase the amount of time available for projects.

    When he joined Westminster College as CIO in 2006, the department faced several infrastructure challenges, including:

    • An unreliable network
    • Aging server replacements and no replacement plan
    • IT was the “department of no”
    • A help desk known as the “helpless desk”
    • A lack of wireless connectivity
    • Internet connection speed that was much too slow

    As the CIO investigated how to address the infrastructure challenges, he realized people cared deeply about how IT spent its time.

    The project load of IT staff increased, with new projects coming in every day.

    With a long project list, it became increasingly important to improve the transparency of project request and prioritization.

    Some weeks, staff spent 80% of their time working on projects. Other weeks, support requirements might leave only 10% for project work.

    He addressed the infrastructure challenges in part by analyzing IT’s routine processes.

    Internally, IT had inefficient support processes that reduced the amount of time they could spend on projects.

    They undertook an internal process analysis effort to identify processes that would have a return on investment if they were improved. The goal was to reduce operational support time so that project time could be increased.

    Five years later, they had a better understanding of the organization's operational support time needs and were able to shift workloads to accommodate projects without compromising support.

    Common challenges experienced by service desk teams

    Unresolved issues

    • Tickets are not created for all incidents.
    • Tickets are lost or escalated to the wrong technicians.
    • Poor data impedes root-cause analysis of incidents.

    Lost resources/accountability

    • Lack of cross-training and knowledge sharing.
    • Lack of skills coverage for critical applications and services.
    • Time is wasted troubleshooting recurring issues.
    • Reports unavailable due to lack of data and poor categorization.

    High cost to resolve

    • Tier 2/3 resolve issues that should be resolved at tier 1.
    • Tier 2/3 often interrupt projects to focus on service support.

    Poor planning

    • Lack of data for effective trend analysis leads to poor demand planning.
    • Lack of data leads to lost opportunities for templating and automation.

    Low business satisfaction

    • Users are unable to get assistance with IT services quickly.
    • Users go to their favorite technician instead of using the service desk.

    Outline the organization’s service desk challenges

    1.1.1 Brainstorm service desk challenges

    Estimated Time: 45 minutes

    A. As a group, outline the areas where you think the service desk is experiencing challenges or weaknesses. Use sticky notes or a whiteboard to separate the challenges into People, Process, and Technology so you have a wholistic view of the constraints across the department.

    B. Think about the following:

    • What have you heard from users? (e.g. slow response time)
    • What have you heard from executives? (e.g. poor communication)
    • What should you start doing? (e.g. documenting processes)
    • What should you stop doing? (e.g. work that is not being entered as tickets)

    C. Document challenges in the Service Desk Project Summary.

    Participants:

    • CIO
    • IT Managers
    • Service Desk Manager
    • Service Desk Agents

    Assess current service desk maturity to establish a baseline and create a plan for service desk improvement

    A current-state assessment will help you build a foundation for process improvements. Current-state assessments follow a basic formula:

    1. Determine the current state of the service desk.
    2. Determine the desired state of the service desk.
    3. Build a practical path from current to desired state.
    Image depicts 2 circles and a box. The circle on the 1. left has assess current state. The circle on the right has 2. assess target state. The box has 3. build a roadmap.

    Ideally, the current-state assessment should align the delivery of IT services with organizational needs. The assessment should achieve the following goals:

    1. Identify service desk pain points.
    2. Map each pain point to business services.
    3. Assign a broad business value to the resolution of each pain point.
    4. Map each pain point to a process.

    Expert Insight

    Image of expert.

    “How do you know if you aren’t mature enough? Nothing – or everything – is recorded and tracked, customer satisfaction is low, frustration is high, and there are multiple requests and incidents that nobody ever bothers to address.”

    Rob England

    IT Consultant & Commentator

    Owner Two Hills

    Also known as The IT Skeptic

    Assess the process maturity of the service desk to determine which project phase and steps will bring the most value

    1.1.2 Measure which activity will have the greatest impact

    The Service Desk Maturity Assessmenttool helps organizations assess their service desk process maturity and focus the project on the activities that matter most.

    The tool will help guide improvement efforts and measure your progress.

    • The second tab of the tool walks through a qualitative assessment of your service desk practices. Questions will prompt you to evaluate how you are executing key activities. Select the answer in the drop-down menus that most closely aligns with your current state.
    • The third tab displays your rate of process completeness and maturity. You will receive a score for each phase, an overall score, and advice based on your performance.
    • Document the results of the efficiency assessment in the Service Desk Project Summary.

    The tool is intended for periodic use. Review your answers each year and devise initiatives to improve the process performance where you need it most.

    Where do I find the data?

    Consult:

    • Service Manager
    • Service Desk Tools
    Image is the service desk tools.

    Step 1.2:Review service support best practices

    Image shows the steps in phase 1. Highlight is on step 1.2.

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    1. 1.2.1 Identify roles and responsibilities in your organization
    2. 1.2.2 Map out the current and target structure of the service desk

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Project Sponsor
    • IT Director, CIO
    • IT Managers and Service Desk Manager(s)
    • Representation from tier 2 and tier 3 specialists

    Outcomes

    Identifying who is accountable for different support practices in the service desk will allow workload to be distributed effectively between functional teams and individuals. Closing the gaps in responsibilities will enable the execution of a shift-left strategy.

    Deliverables

    • Roles & responsibilities guide
    • Service desk structure

    Everyone in IT contributes to the success of service support

    Regardless of the service desk structure chosen to meet an organization’s service support requirements, IT staff should not doubt the role they play in service support.

    If you try to standardize service desk processes without engaging specialists in other parts of the IT organization, you will fail. Everyone in IT has a role to play in providing service support and meeting service-level agreements.

    Service Support Engagement Plan

    • Identify who is accountable for different service support processes.
    • Outline the different responsibilities of service desk agents at tier 1, tier 2, and tier 3 in meeting service-level agreements for service support.
    • Draft operational-level agreements between specialty groups and the service desk to improve accountability.
    • Configure the service desk tool to ensure ticket visibility and ownership across queues.
    • Engage tier 2 and tier 3 resources in building workflows for incident management, request fulfilment, and writing knowledgebase articles.
    • Emphasize the benefits of cooperation across IT silos:
      • Better customer service and end-user satisfaction.
      • Shorter time to resolve incidents and implement requests.
      • A higher tier 1 resolution rate, more efficient escalations, and fewer interruptions from project work.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Specialists tend to distance themselves from service support as they progress through their career to focus on projects.

    However, their cooperation is critical to the success of the new service desk. Not only do they contribute to the knowledgebase, but they also handle escalations from tiers 1 and 2.

    Clear project complications by leveraging roles and responsibilities

    R

    Responsible: This person is the staff member who completes the work. Assign at least one Responsible for each task, but this could be more than one.

    A

    Accountable: This team member delegates a task and is the last person to review deliverables and/or task. Sometimes Responsible and Accountable can be the same staff. Make sure that you always assign only one Accountable for each task and not more.

    C

    Consulted: People who do not carry out the task but need to be consulted. Typically, these people are subject matter experts or stakeholders.

    I

    Informed: People who receive information about process execution and quality and need to stay informed regarding the task.

    A RACI analysis is helpful with the following:

    • Workload Balancing: Allowing responsibilities to be distributed effectively between functional teams and individuals.
    • Change Management: Ensuring key functions and processes are not overlooked during organizational changes.
    • Onboarding: New employees can identify their own roles and responsibilities.

    A RACI chart outlines which positions are Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, and Informed

    Image shows example of RACI chart

    Create a list of roles and responsibilities in your organization

    1.2.1 Create RACI matrix to define responsibilities

    1. Use the Service Desk Roles and Responsibilities Guidefor a better understanding of the roles and responsibilities of different service desk tiers.
    2. In the RACI chart, replace the top row with specific roles in your organization.
    3. Modify or expand the process tasks, as needed, in the left column.
    4. For each role, identify the responsibility values that the person brings to the service desk. Fill out each column.
    5. Document in the Service Desk SOP. Schedule a time to share the results with organization leads.
    6. Distribute the chart between all teams in your organization.

    Notes:

    • Assign one Accountable for each task.
    • Have at least one Responsible for each task.
    • Avoid generic responsibilities, such as “team meetings.”
    • Keep your RACI definitions in your documents, as they are sometimes tough to remember.

    Participants

    • CIO
    • IT Managers
    • Service Desk Manager
    • Service Desk Agents

    What You'll Need

    • Service Desk SOP
    • Roles and Responsibilities Guide
    • Flip Chart
    • Whiteboard

    Build a single point of contact for the service desk

    Regardless of the service desk structure chosen to meet your service support requirements, end users should be in no doubt about how to access the service.

    Provide end users with:

    • A single phone number.
    • A single email address.
    • A single web portal for all incidents and requests.

    A single point of contact will ensure:

    • An agent is available to field incidents and requests.
    • Incidents and requests are prioritized according to impact and urgency.
    • Work is tracked to completion.

    This prevents ad hoc ticket channels such as shoulder grabs or direct emails, chats, or calls to a technician from interrupting work.

    A single point of contact does not mean the service desk is only accessible through one intake channel, but rather all tickets are directed to the service desk (i.e. tier 1) to be resolved or redirected appropriately.

    Image depicts 2 boxes. The smaller box labelled users and the larger box labelled Service Desk Tier 1. There are four double-sided arrows. The top is labelled email, the second is walk-in, the third is phone, the fourth is web portal.

    Directors and executives understand the importance of the service desk and believe IT can do better

    A double bar graph is depicted. The blue bars represent Effectiveness and the green bars represent Importance in terms of service desk at different seniority levels, which include frontline, manager, director, and executive.

    Source: Info-Tech, 2019 Responses (N=189 organizations)

    Service Desk Importance Scores

      No Importance: 1.0-6.9
      Limited Importance: 7.0-7.9
      Significant Importance: 8.0-8.9
      Critical Importance: 9.0-10.0

    Service Desk Effectiveness Scores

      Not in Place: N/A
      Not Effective: 0.0-4.9
      Somewhat Ineffective: 5.0-5.9
      Somewhat Effective: 6.0-6.9
      Very Effective: 7.0-10.0

    Info-Tech Research Group’s IT Management and Governance Diagnostic (MGD) program assesses the importance and effectiveness of core IT processes. Since its inception, the MGD has consistently identified the service desk as an area to leverage.

    Business stakeholders consistently rank the service desk as one of the top five most important services that IT provides

    Since 2013, Info-Tech has surveyed over 40,000 business stakeholders as part of our CIO Business Vision program.

    Business stakeholders ranked the following 12 core IT services in terms of importance:

    Learn more about the CIO Business Vision Program.
    *Note: IT Security was added to CIO Business Vision 2.0 in 2019

    Top IT Services for Business Stakeholders

    1. Network Infrastructure
    2. IT Security*
    3. Data Quality
    4. Service Desk
    5. Business Applications
    6. Devices
    7. Client-Facing Technology
    8. Analytical Capability
    9. IT Innovation Leadership
    10. Projects
    11. Work Orders
    12. IT Policies
    13. Requirements Gathering
    Source: Info-Tech Research Group, 2019 (N=224 organizations)

    Having an effective and timely service desk correlates with higher end-user satisfaction with all other IT services

    A double bar graph is depicted. The blue bar represents dissatisfied ender user, and the green bar represents satisfied end user. The bars show the average of dissatisfied and satisfied end users for service desk effectiveness and service desk timeliness.

    On average, organizations that were satisfied with service desk effectiveness rated all other IT processes 46% higher than dissatisfied end users.

    Organizations that were satisfied with service desk timeliness rated all other IT processes 37% higher than dissatisfied end users.
    “Satisfied” organizations had average scores =8.“Dissatisfied" organizations had average scores “Dissatisfied" organizations had average scores =6. Source: Info-Tech Research Group, 2019 (N=18,500+ respondents from 75 organizations)

    Standardize the service desk the Info-Tech way to get measurable results

    More than one hundred organizations engaged with Info-Tech, through advisory calls and workshops, for their service desk projects in 2016. Their goal was either to improve an existing service desk or build one from scratch.

    Organizations that estimate the business impact of each project phase help us shed light on the average measured value of the engagements.

    "The analysts are an amazing resource for this project. Their approach is very methodical, and they have the ability to fill in the big picture with detailed, actionable steps. There is a real opportunity for us to get off the treadmill and make real IT service management improvements"

    - Rod Gula, IT Director

    American Realty Advisors

    Three circles are depicted. The top circle shows the sum of measured value dollar impact which is US$1,659,493.37. The middle circle shows the average measured value dollar impact which is US$19,755.87. The bottom circle shows the average measured value time saved which is 27 days.

    Info-Tech’s approach to service desk standardization focuses on building service management essentials

    This image depicts all of the phases and steps in this blueprint.

    Info-Tech draws on the COBIT framework, which focuses on consistent delivery of IT services across the organization

    This image depicts research that can be used to improve IT processes. Service Desk is circled to demonstrate which research is being used.

    The service desk is the foundation of all other service management processes.

    The image shows how the service desk is a foundation for other service management processes.

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    “Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful.”

    Guided Implementation

    “Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track.”

    Workshop

    “We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place.”

    Consulting

    “Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project.”

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

    Standardize the Service Desk – project overview

    This image shows the project overview of this blueprint.

    Info-Tech delivers: Use our tools and templates to accelerate your project to completion

    Project Summary

    Image of template.

    Service Desk Standard Operating Procedures

    Image of tool.

    Service Desk Maturity Assessment Tool

    Image of tool.

    Service Desk Implementation Roadmap

    Image of tool Incident, knowledge, and request management workflows

    Incident, knowledge, and request management workflows

    The project’s key deliverable is a service desk standard operating procedure

    Benefits of documented SOPs:

    Improved training and knowledge transfer: Routine tasks can be delegated to junior staff (freeing senior staff to work on higher priority tasks).

    IT automation, process optimization, and consistent operations: Defining, documenting, and then optimizing processes enables IT automation to be built on sound processes, so consistent positive results can be achieved.

    Compliance: Compliance audits are more manageable because the documentation is already in place.

    Transparency: Visually documented processes answer the common business question of “why does that take so long?”

    Cost savings: Work solved at first contact or with a minimal number of escalations will result in greater efficiency and more cost-effective support. This will also lead to better customer service.

    Impact of undocumented/undefined SOPs:

    Tasks will be difficult to delegate, key staff become a bottleneck, knowledge transfer is inconsistent, and there is a longer onboarding process for new staff

    IT automation built on poorly defined, unoptimized processes leads to inconsistent results.

    Documenting SOPs to prepare for an audit becomes a major time-intensive project.

    Other areas of the organization may not understand how IT operates, which can lead to confusion and unrealistic expectations.

    Support costs are highest through inefficient processes, and proactive work becomes more difficult to schedule, making the organization vulnerable to costly disruptions.

    Workshop Overview

    Image depicts workshop overview occurring over four days.

    Contact your account representative or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Phase 1

    Lay Service Desk Foundations

    Step 1.1:Assess current state

    Image shows the steps in phase 1. Highlight is on step 1.1

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • 1.1.1 Outline service desk challenges
    • 1.1.2 Assess the service desk maturity

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Project Sponsor
    • IT Director, CIO
    • IT Managers and Service Desk Manager(s)
    • Representation from tier 2 and tier 3 specialists

    Outcomes

    Alignment on the challenges that the service desk faces, an assessment of the current state of service desk processes and technologies, and baseline metrics against which to measure improvements.

    Deliverables

    • Service Desk Maturity Assessment

    Standardizing the service desk benefits the whole business

    The image depicts 3 circles to represent the service desk foundations.

    Embrace standardization

    • Standardization prevents wasted energy on reinventing solutions to recurring issues.
    • Standardized processes are scalable so that process maturity increases with the size of your organization.

    Increase business satisfaction

    • Improve confidence that the service desk can meet service levels.
    • Create a single point of contact for incidents and requests and escalate quickly.
    • Analyze trends to forecast and meet shifting business requirements.

    Reduce recurring issues

    • Create tickets for every task and categorize them accurately.
    • Generate reliable data to support root-cause analysis.

    Increase efficiency and lower operating costs

    • Empower end users and technicians with a targeted knowledgebase (KB).
    • Cross-train to improve service consistency.

    Case Study: The CIO of Westminster College took stock of existing processes before moving to empower the “helpless desk”

    Scott Lowe helped a small staff of eight IT professionals formalize service desk processes and increase the amount of time available for projects.

    When he joined Westminster College as CIO in 2006, the department faced several infrastructure challenges, including:

    • An unreliable network
    • Aging server replacements and no replacement plan
    • IT was the “department of no”
    • A help desk known as the “helpless desk”
    • A lack of wireless connectivity
    • Internet connection speed that was much too slow

    As the CIO investigated how to address the infrastructure challenges, he realized people cared deeply about how IT spent its time.

    The project load of IT staff increased, with new projects coming in every day.

    With a long project list, it became increasingly important to improve the transparency of project request and prioritization.

    Some weeks, staff spent 80% of their time working on projects. Other weeks, support requirements might leave only 10% for project work.

    He addressed the infrastructure challenges in part by analyzing IT’s routine processes.

    Internally, IT had inefficient support processes that reduced the amount of time they could spend on projects.

    They undertook an internal process analysis effort to identify processes that would have a return on investment if they were improved. The goal was to reduce operational support time so that project time could be increased.

    Five years later, they had a better understanding of the organization's operational support time needs and were able to shift workloads to accommodate projects without compromising support.

    Common challenges experienced by service desk teams

    Unresolved issues

    • Tickets are not created for all incidents.
    • Tickets are lost or escalated to the wrong technicians.
    • Poor data impedes root-cause analysis of incidents.

    Lost resources/accountability

    • Lack of cross-training and knowledge sharing.
    • Lack of skills coverage for critical applications and services.
    • Time is wasted troubleshooting recurring issues.
    • Reports unavailable due to lack of data and poor categorization.

    High cost to resolve

    • Tier 2/3 resolve issues that should be resolved at tier 1.
    • Tier 2/3 often interrupt projects to focus on service support.

    Poor planning

    • Lack of data for effective trend analysis leads to poor demand planning.
    • Lack of data leads to lost opportunities for templating and automation.

    Low business satisfaction

    • Users are unable to get assistance with IT services quickly.
    • Users go to their favorite technician instead of using the service desk.

    Outline the organization’s service desk challenges

    1.1.1 Brainstorm service desk challenges

    Estimated Time: 45 minutes

    A. As a group, outline the areas where you think the service desk is experiencing challenges or weaknesses. Use sticky notes or a whiteboard to separate the challenges into People, Process, and Technology so you have a wholistic view of the constraints across the department.

    B. Think about the following:

    • What have you heard from users? (e.g. slow response time)
    • What have you heard from executives? (e.g. poor communication)
    • What should you start doing? (e.g. documenting processes)
    • What should you stop doing? (e.g. work that is not being entered as tickets)

    C. Document challenges in the Service Desk Project Summary.

    Participants:

    • CIO
    • IT Managers
    • Service Desk Manager
    • Service Desk Agents

    Assess current service desk maturity to establish a baseline and create a plan for service desk improvement

    A current-state assessment will help you build a foundation for process improvements. Current-state assessments follow a basic formula:

    1. Determine the current state of the service desk.
    2. Determine the desired state of the service desk.
    3. Build a practical path from current to desired state.
    Image depicts 2 circles and a box. The circle on the 1. left has assess current state. The circle on the right has 2. assess target state. The box has 3. build a roadmap.

    Ideally, the current-state assessment should align the delivery of IT services with organizational needs. The assessment should achieve the following goals:

    1. Identify service desk pain points.
    2. Map each pain point to business services.
    3. Assign a broad business value to the resolution of each pain point.
    4. Map each pain point to a process.

    Expert Insight

    Image of expert.

    “How do you know if you aren’t mature enough? Nothing – or everything – is recorded and tracked, customer satisfaction is low, frustration is high, and there are multiple requests and incidents that nobody ever bothers to address.”

    Rob England

    IT Consultant & Commentator

    Owner Two Hills

    Also known as The IT Skeptic

    Assess the process maturity of the service desk to determine which project phase and steps will bring the most value

    1.1.2 Measure which activity will have the greatest impact

    The Service Desk Maturity Assessmenttool helps organizations assess their service desk process maturity and focus the project on the activities that matter most.

    The tool will help guide improvement efforts and measure your progress.

    • The second tab of the tool walks through a qualitative assessment of your service desk practices. Questions will prompt you to evaluate how you are executing key activities. Select the answer in the drop-down menus that most closely aligns with your current state.
    • The third tab displays your rate of process completeness and maturity. You will receive a score for each phase, an overall score, and advice based on your performance.
    • Document the results of the efficiency assessment in the Service Desk Project Summary.

    The tool is intended for periodic use. Review your answers each year and devise initiatives to improve the process performance where you need it most.

    Where do I find the data?

    Consult:

    • Service Manager
    • Service Desk Tools
    Image is the service desk tools.

    Step 1.2:Review service support best practices

    Image shows the steps in phase 1. Highlight is on step 1.2.

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    1. 1.2.1 Identify roles and responsibilities in your organization
    2. 1.2.2 Map out the current and target structure of the service desk

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Project Sponsor
    • IT Director, CIO
    • IT Managers and Service Desk Manager(s)
    • Representation from tier 2 and tier 3 specialists

    Outcomes

    Identifying who is accountable for different support practices in the service desk will allow workload to be distributed effectively between functional teams and individuals. Closing the gaps in responsibilities will enable the execution of a shift-left strategy.

    Deliverables

    • Roles & responsibilities guide
    • Service desk structure

    Everyone in IT contributes to the success of service support

    Regardless of the service desk structure chosen to meet an organization’s service support requirements, IT staff should not doubt the role they play in service support.

    If you try to standardize service desk processes without engaging specialists in other parts of the IT organization, you will fail. Everyone in IT has a role to play in providing service support and meeting service-level agreements.

    Service Support Engagement Plan

    • Identify who is accountable for different service support processes.
    • Outline the different responsibilities of service desk agents at tier 1, tier 2, and tier 3 in meeting service-level agreements for service support.
    • Draft operational-level agreements between specialty groups and the service desk to improve accountability.
    • Configure the service desk tool to ensure ticket visibility and ownership across queues.
    • Engage tier 2 and tier 3 resources in building workflows for incident management, request fulfilment, and writing knowledgebase articles.
    • Emphasize the benefits of cooperation across IT silos:
      • Better customer service and end-user satisfaction.
      • Shorter time to resolve incidents and implement requests.
      • A higher tier 1 resolution rate, more efficient escalations, and fewer interruptions from project work.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Specialists tend to distance themselves from service support as they progress through their career to focus on projects.

    However, their cooperation is critical to the success of the new service desk. Not only do they contribute to the knowledgebase, but they also handle escalations from tiers 1 and 2.

    Clear project complications by leveraging roles and responsibilities

    R

    Responsible: This person is the staff member who completes the work. Assign at least one Responsible for each task, but this could be more than one.

    A

    Accountable: This team member delegates a task and is the last person to review deliverables and/or task. Sometimes Responsible and Accountable can be the same staff. Make sure that you always assign only one Accountable for each task and not more.

    C

    Consulted: People who do not carry out the task but need to be consulted. Typically, these people are subject matter experts or stakeholders.

    I

    Informed: People who receive information about process execution and quality and need to stay informed regarding the task.

    A RACI analysis is helpful with the following:

    • Workload Balancing: Allowing responsibilities to be distributed effectively between functional teams and individuals.
    • Change Management: Ensuring key functions and processes are not overlooked during organizational changes.
    • Onboarding: New employees can identify their own roles and responsibilities.

    A RACI chart outlines which positions are Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, and Informed

    Image shows example of RACI chart

    Create a list of roles and responsibilities in your organization

    1.2.1 Create RACI matrix to define responsibilities

    1. Use the Service Desk Roles and Responsibilities Guidefor a better understanding of the roles and responsibilities of different service desk tiers.
    2. In the RACI chart, replace the top row with specific roles in your organization.
    3. Modify or expand the process tasks, as needed, in the left column.
    4. For each role, identify the responsibility values that the person brings to the service desk. Fill out each column.
    5. Document in the Service Desk SOP. Schedule a time to share the results with organization leads.
    6. Distribute the chart between all teams in your organization.

    Notes:

    • Assign one Accountable for each task.
    • Have at least one Responsible for each task.
    • Avoid generic responsibilities, such as “team meetings.”
    • Keep your RACI definitions in your documents, as they are sometimes tough to remember.

    Participants

    • CIO
    • IT Managers
    • Service Desk Manager
    • Service Desk Agents

    What You'll Need

    • Service Desk SOP
    • Roles and Responsibilities Guide
    • Flip Chart
    • Whiteboard

    Build a tiered generalist service desk to optimize costs

    A tiered generalist service desk with a first-tier resolution rate greater than 60% has the best operating cost and customer satisfaction of all competing service desk structural models.

    Image depicts a tiered generalist service desk example. It shows a flow from users to tier 1 and to tiers 2 and 3.

    The success of a tiered generalist model depends on standardized, defined processes

    Image lists the processes and benefits of a successful tiered generalist service desk.

    Define the structure of the service desk

    1.2.2 Map out the current and target structure of the service desk

    Estimated Time: 45 minutes

    Instructions:

    1. Using the model from the previous slides as a guide, discuss how closely it matches the current service desk structure.
    2. Map out a similar diagram of your existing service desk structure, intake channels, and escalation paths.
    3. Review the structure and discuss any changes that could be made to improve efficiency. Revise as needed.
    4. Document the outcome in the Service Desk Project Summary.

    Image depicts a tiered generalist service desk example. It shows a flow from users to tier 1 and to tiers 2 and 3.

    Participants

    • CIO
    • IT Managers
    • Service Desk Manager
    • Service Desk Agents

    Use a shift-left strategy to lower service support costs, reduce time to resolve, and improve end-user satisfaction

    Shift-left strategy:

    • Shift service support tasks from specialists to generalists.
    • Implement self-service.
    • Automate incident resolution.
    Image shows the incident and service request resolution in a graph. It includes metrics of cost per ticket, average time to resolve, and end-user satisfaction.

    Work through the implications of adopting a shift-left strategy

    Overview:

    Identify process gaps that you need to fill to support the shift-left strategy and discuss how you could adopt or improve the shift-left strategy, using the discussion questions below as a guide.

    Which process gaps do you need to fill to identify ticket trends?

    • What are your most common incidents and service requests?
    • Which tickets could be resolved at tier 1?
    • Which tickets could be resolved as self-service tickets?
    • Which tickets could be automated?

    Which processes do you most need to improve to support a shift-left strategy?

    • Which incident and request processes are well documented?
    • Do you have recurring tickets that could be automated?
    • What is the state of your knowledgebase maintenance process?
    • Which articles do you most need to support tier 1 resolution?
    • What is the state of your web portal? How could it be improved to support self-service?

    Document in the Project Summary

    Step 1.3: Identify service desk metrics and reports

    Image shows the steps in phase 1. Highlight is on step 1.3.

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • 1.3 Create a list of required reports to identify relevant metrics

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Project Sponsor
    • IT Managers and Service Desk Manager(s)
    • Representation from tier 2 and tier 3 specialists

    Outcomes

    Managers and analysts will have service desk metrics and reports that help set expectations and communicate service desk performance.

    Deliverables

    • A list of service desk performance metrics and reports

    Engage business unit leaders with data to appreciate needs

    Service desk reports are an opportunity to communicate the story of IT and collect stakeholder feedback. Interview business unit leaders and look for opportunities to improve IT services.

    Start with the following questions:

    • What are you hearing from your team about working with IT?
    • What are the issues that are contributing to productivity losses?
    • What are the workarounds your team does because something isn’t working?
    • Are you able to access the information you need?

    Work with business unit leaders to develop an action plan.

    Remember to communicate what you do to address stakeholder grievances.

    The service recovery paradox is a situation in which end users think more highly of IT after the organization has corrected a problem with their service compared to how they would regard the company if the service had not been faulty in the first place.

    The point is that addressing issues (and being seen to address issues) will significantly improve end-user satisfaction. Communicate that you’re listening and acting, and you should see satisfaction improve.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Presentation is everything:

    If you are presenting outside of IT, or using operational metrics to create strategic information, be prepared to:

    • Discuss trends.
    • Identify organizational and departmental impacts.
    • Assess IT costs and productivity.

    For example, “Number of incidents with ERP system has decreased by 5% after our last patch release. We are working on the next set of changes and expect the issues to continue to decrease.”

    Engage technicians to ensure they input quality data in the service desk tool

    You need better data to address problems. Communicate to the technical team what you need from them and how their efforts contribute to the usefulness of reports.

    Tickets MUST:

    • Be created for all incidents and service requests.
    • Be categorized correctly, and categories updated when the ticket is resolved.
    • Be closed after the incidents and service requests are resolved or implemented.

    Emphasize that reports are analyzed regularly and used to manage costs, improve services, and request more resources.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Service Desk Manager: Technical staff can help themselves analyze the backlog and improve service metrics if they’re looking at the right information. Ensure their service desk dashboards are helping them identify high-priority and quick-win tickets and anticipate potential SLA breaches.

    Produce service desk reports targeted to improve IT services

    Use metrics and reports to tell the story of IT.

    Metrics should be tied to business requirements and show how well IT is meeting those requirements and where obstacles exist.

    Tailor metrics and reports to specific stakeholders.

    Technicians require mostly real-time information in the form of a dashboard, providing visibility into a prioritized list of tickets for which they are responsible.

    Supervisors need tactical information to manage the team and set client expectations as well as track and meet strategic goals.

    Managers and executives need summary information that supports strategic goals. Start by looking at executive goals for the support team and then working through some of the more tactical data that will help support those goals.

    One metric doesn’t give you the whole picture

    • Don’t put too much emphasis on a single metric. At best, it will give you a distorted picture of your service desk performance. At worst, it will distort the behavior of your agents as they may adopt poor practices to meet the metric.
    • The solution is to use tension metrics: metrics that work together to give you a better sense of the state of operations.
    • Tension metrics ensure a balanced focus toward shared goals.

    Example:

    First-call resolution (FCR), end-user satisfaction, and number of tickets reopened all work together to give you a complete picture. As FCR goes up, so should end-user satisfaction, as number of tickets re-opened stays steady or declines. If the three metrics are heading in different directions, then you know you have a problem.

    Rely on internal metrics to measure and improve performance

    External metrics provide useful context, but they represent broad generalizations across different industries and organizations of different sizes. Internal metrics measured annually are more reliable.

    Internal metrics provide you with information about your actual performance. With the right continual improvement process, you can improve those metrics year over year, which is a better measure of the performance of your service desk.

    Whether a given metric is the right one for your service desk will depend on several different factors, not the least of which include:

    • The maturity of your service desk processes.
    • Your ticket volume.
    • The complexity of your tickets.
    • The degree to which your end users are comfortable with self-service.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Take external metrics with a grain of salt. Most benchmarks represent what service desks do across different industries, not what they should do. There also might be significant differences between different industries in terms of the kinds of tickets they deal with, differences which the overall average obscures.

    Use key service desk metrics to build a business case for service support improvements

    The right metrics can tell the business how hard IT works and how many resources it needs to perform:

    1. End-User Satisfactions:
      • The most important metric for measuring the perceived value of the service desk. Determine this based on a robust annual satisfaction survey of end users and transactional satisfaction surveys sent with a percentage of tickets.
    2. Ticket Volume and Cost per Ticket:
      • A key indicator of service desk efficiency, computed as the monthly operating expense divided by the average ticket volume per month.
    3. First-Contact Resolution Rate:
      • The biggest driver of end-user satisfaction. Depending on the kind of tickets you deal with, you can measure first-contact, first-tier, or first-day resolution.
    4. Average Time to Resolve (Incident) or Fulfill (Service Requests):
      • An assessment of the service desk's ability to resolve tickets effectively, measuring the time elapsed between the moment the ticket status is set to “open” and the moment it is set to “resolved.”

    Info-Tech Insight

    Metrics should be tied to business requirements. They tell the story of how well IT is meeting those requirements and help identify when obstacles get in the way. The latter can be done by pointing to discrepancies between the internal metrics you expected to reach but didn’t and external metrics you trust.

    Use service desk metrics to track progress toward strategic, operational, and tactical goals

    Image depicts a chart to show the various metrics in terms of strategic goals, tactical goals, and operational goals.

    Cost per ticket and customer satisfaction are the foundation metrics of service support

    Ultimately, everything boils down to cost containment (measured by cost per ticket) and quality of service (measured by customer satisfaction).

    Cost per ticket is a measure of the efficiency of service support:

    • A higher than average cost per ticket is not necessarily a bad thing, particularly if accompanied by higher-than-average quality levels.
    • Conversely, a low cost per ticket is not necessarily good, particularly if the low cost is achieved by sacrificing quality of service.

    Cost per ticket is the total monthly operating expense of the service desk divided by the monthly ticket volume. Operating expense includes the following components:

    • Salaries and benefits for desktop support technicians
    • Salaries and benefits for indirect personnel (team leads, supervisors, workforce schedulers, dispatchers, QA/QC personnel, trainers, and managers)
    • Technology expense (e.g. computers, software licensing fees)
    • Telecommunications expenses
    • Facilities expenses (e.g. office space, utilities, insurance)
    • Travel, training, and office supplies
    Image displays a pie chart that shows the various service desk costs.

    Create a list of required reports to identify metrics to track

    1.3.1 Start by identifying the reports you need, then identify the metrics that produce them

    1. Answer the following questions to determine the data your reports require:
      • What strategic initiatives do you need to track?
        • Example: reducing mean time to resolve, meeting SLAs
      • What operational areas need attention?
        • Example: recurring issues that need a permanent resolution
      • What kind of issues do you want to solve?
        • Example: automate tasks such as password reset or software distribution
      • What decisions or processes are held up due to lack of information?
        • Example: need to build a business case to justify infrastructure upgrades
      • How can the data be used to improve services to the business?
        • Example: recurring issues by department
    2. Document report and metrics requirements in Service Desk SOP.
    3. Provide the list to your tool administrator to create reports with auto-distribution.

    Participants

    • CIO
    • IT Managers
    • Service Desk Manager
    • Service Desk Agents

    What You'll Need

    • Service Desk SOP
    • Flip Chart
    • Whiteboard

    Step 1.4: Review ticket handling procedures

    Image shows the steps in phase 1. Highlight is on step 1.4.

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • 1.4.1 Review ticket handling practices
    • 1.4.2 Identify opportunities to automate ticket creation and reduce recurring tickets

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Project Sponsor
    • IT Managers and Service Desk Manager(s)
    • Representation from tier 2 and tier 3 specialists

    Outcomes

    Managers and analysts will have best practices for ticket handling and troubleshooting to support ITSM data quality and improve first-tier resolution.

    DELIVERABLES

    • List of ticket templates and recurring tickets
    • Ticket and Call QA Template and ticket handling best practices

    Start by reviewing the incident intake process to find opportunities for improvement

    If end users are avoiding your service desk, you may have an intake problem. Create alternative ways for users to seek help to manage the volume; keep in mind not every request is an emergency.

    Image shows the various intake channels and the recommendation.

    Identify opportunities for improvement in your ticket channels

    The two most efficient intake channels should be encouraged for the majority of tickets.

    • Build a self-service portal.
      • Do users know where to find the portal?
      • How many tickets are created through the portal?
      • Is the interface easy to use?
    • Deal efficiently with email.
      • How quickly are messages picked up?
      • Are they manually transferred to a ticket or does the service desk tool automatically create a ticket?

    The two most traditional and fastest methods to get help must deal with emergencies and escalation effectively.

    • Phone should be the fastest way to get help for emergencies.
      • Are enough agents answering calls?
      • Are voicemails picked up on time?
      • Are the automated call routing prompts clear and concise?
    • Are walk-ins permitted and formalized?
      • Do you always have someone at the desk?
      • Is your equipment secure?
      • Are walk-ins common because no one picks up the phone or is the traffic as you’d expect?

    Ensure technicians create tickets for all incidents and requests

    Why Collect Ticket Data?

    If many tickets are missing, help service support staff understand the need to collect the data. Reports will be inaccurate and meaningless if quality data isn’t entered into the ticketing system.

    Image shows example of ticket data

    Set ticket handling expectations to drive a consistent process

    Set expectations:

    • Create and update tickets, but not at the expense of good customer service. Agents can start the ticket but shouldn’t spend five minutes creating the ticket when they should be troubleshooting the problem.
    • Update the ticket when the issue is resolved or needs to be escalated. If agents are escalating, they should make sure all relevant information is passed along to the next technician.
    • Update user of ETA if issue cannot be resolved quickly.
    • Ticket templates for common incidents can lead to fast creation, data input, and categorizations. Templates can reduce the time it takes to create tickets from two minutes to 30 seconds.
    • Update categories to reflect the actual issue and resolution.
    • Reference or link to the knowledgebase article as the documented steps taken to resolve the incident.
    • Validate incident is resolved with client; automate this process with ticket closure after a certain time.
    • Close or resolve the ticket on time.

    Use the Ticket and Call Quality Assessment Tool to improve the quality of service desk data

    Build a process to check-in on ticket and call quality monthly

    Better data leads to better decisions. Use the Ticket and Call Quality Assessment Toolto check-in on the ticket and call quality monthly for each technician and improve service desk data quality.

    1. Fill tab 1 with technician’s name.
    2. Use either tab 2 (auto-scoring) or tab 3 (manual scoring) to score the agent. The assessment includes ticket evaluation, call evaluation, and overall metric.
    3. Record the results of each review in the score summary of tab 1.
    Image shows tool.

    Use ticket templates to make ticket creation, updating, and resolution more efficient

    A screenshot of the Ticket and Call Quality Assessment Tool

    Implement measures to improve ticket handling and identify ticket template candidates

    1.4.1 Identify opportunities to automate ticket creation

    1. Poll the team and discuss.
      • How many members of the team are not creating tickets? Why?
      • How can we address those barriers?
      • What are the expectations of management?
    2. Brainstorm five to ten good candidates for ticket templates.
      • What data can auto-fill?
      • What will help process the ticket faster?
      • What automations can we build to ensure a fast, consistent service?
      • Note:
        • Ticket template name
        • Information that will auto-fill from AD and other applications
        • Categories and resolution codes
        • Automated routing and email responses
    3. Document ticket template candidates in the Service Desk Roadmap to capture the actions.

    Participants

    • Service Desk Manager
    • Service Desk Agents

    What You'll Needs

    • Flip Chart
    • Whiteboard

    Phase 2

    Design Incident Management Processes

    Step 2.1: Build incident management workflows

    Image shows the steps in phase 2. Highlight is on step 2.1.

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • 2.1.1 Review incident management challenges
    • 2.1.2 Define the incident management workflow
    • 2.1.3 Define the critical incident management workflow
    • 2.1.4 Design critical incident communication plan

    This step involves the following participants:

    • IT Managers
    • Service Desk Manager(s)
    • Representation from tier 2 and tier 3 specialists

    Outcomes

    Workflows for incident management and critical incident management will improve the consistency and quality of service delivery and prepare the service desk to negotiate reliable service levels with the organization.

    DELIVERABLES

    • Incident management workflows
    • Critical incident management workflows
    • Critical incident communication plan

    Communicate the great incident resolution work that you do to improve end-user satisfaction

    End users think more highly of IT after the organization has corrected a problem with their service than they would have had the service not been faulty in the first place.

    Image displays a graph to show the service recovery paradox

    Info-Tech Insight

    Use the service recovery paradox to your advantage. Address service desk challenges explicitly, develop incident management processes that get services back online quickly, and communicate the changes.

    If you show that the service desk recovered well from the challenges end users raised, you will get greater loyalty from them.

    Assign incident roles and responsibilities to promote accountability

    The role of an incident coordinator or manager can be assigned to anyone inside the service desk that has a strong knowledge of incident resolution, attention to detail, and knows how to herd cats.

    In organizations with high ticket volumes, a separate role may be necessary.

    Everyone must recognize that incident management is a cross-IT organization process and it does not have to be a unique service desk process.

    An incident coordinator is responsible for:

    • Improving incident management processes.
    • Tracking metrics and producing reports.
    • Developing and maintaining the incident management system.
    • Developing and maintaining critical incident processes.
    • Ensuring the service support team follows the incident management process.
    • Gathering post-mortem information from the various technical resources on root cause for critical or severity 1 incidents.

    The Director of IT Services invested in incident management to improve responsiveness and set end-user expectations

    Practitioner Insight

    Ben Rodrigues developed a progressive plan to create a responsive, service-oriented culture for the service support organization.

    "When I joined the organization, there wasn’t a service desk. People just phoned, emailed, maybe left [sticky] notes for who they thought in IT would resolve it. There wasn’t a lot of investment in developing clear processes. It was ‘Let’s call somebody in IT.’

    I set up the service desk to clarify what we would do for end users and to establish some SLAs.

    I didn’t commit to service levels right away. I needed to see how many resources and what skill sets I would need. I started by drafting some SLA targets and plugging them into our tracking application. I then monitored how we did on certain things and established if we needed other skill sets. Then I communicated those SOPs to the business, so that ‘if you have an issue, this is where you go, and this is how you do it,’ and then shared those KPIs with them.

    I had monthly meetings with different function heads to say, ‘this is what I see your guys calling me about,’ and we worked on something together to make some of the pain disappear."

    -Ben Rodrigues

    Director, IT Services

    Gamma Dynacare

    Sketch out incident management challenges to focus improvements

    Common Incident Management Challenges

    End Users

    • No faith in the service desk beyond speaking with their favorite technician.
    • No expectations for response or resolution time.
    • Non-IT staff are disrupted as people ask their colleagues for IT advice.

    Technicians

    • No one manages and escalates incidents.
    • Incidents are unnecessarily urgent and more likely to have a greater impact.
    • Agents are flooded with requests to do routine tasks during desk visits.
    • Specialist support staff are subject to constant interruptions.
    • Tickets are lost, incomplete, or escalated incorrectly.
    • Incidents are resolved from scratch rather than referring to existing solutions.

    Managers

    • Tickets are incomplete or lack historical information to address complaints.
    • Tickets in system don’t match the perceived workload.
    • Unable to gather data for budgeting or business analysis.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Consistent incident management processes will improve end-user satisfaction with all other IT services.

    However, be prepared to overcome these common obstacles as you put the process in place, including:

    • Absence of management or staff commitment.
    • Lack of clarity on organizational needs.
    • Outdated work practices.
    • Poorly defined service desk goals and responsibilities.
    • Lack of a reliable knowledgebase.
    • Inadequate training.
    • Resistance to change.

    Prepare to implement or improve incident management

    2.1.1 Review incident management challenges and metrics

    1. Review your incident management challenges and the benefits of addressing them.
    2. Review the level of service you are providing with the current resources. Define clear goals and deliverables for the improvement initiative.
    3. Decide how the incident management process will interface with the service desk. Who will take on the responsibility for resolving incidents? Specifically, who will:
      • Log incidents.
      • Perform initial incident troubleshooting.
      • Own and monitor tickets.
      • Communicate with end users.
      • Update records with the resolution.
      • Close incidents.
      • Implement next steps (e.g. initiate problem management).
    4. Document recommendations and the incident management process requirements in the Service Desk SOP.

    Participants

    • Service Desk Manager
    • Service Desk Agents

    What You’ll Need

    • Service Desk SOP
    • Flip Chart
    • Whiteboard

    Distinguish between different kinds of tickets for better SLAs

    Different ticket types are associated with radically different prioritization, routing, and service levels. For instance, most incidents are resolved within a business day, but requests take longer to implement.

    If you fail to distinguish between ticket types, your metrics will obscure service desk performance.

    Common Service Desk Tickets

    • Incidents
      • An unanticipated interruption of a service.
        • The goal of incident management is to restore the service as soon as possible, even if the resolution involves a workaround.
    • Problems
      • The root cause of several incidents.
        • The goal of problem management is to detect the root cause and provide long-term resolution and prevention.
    • Requests
      • A generic description for small changes or service access
        • Requests are small, frequent, and low risk. They are best handled by a process distinct from incident, change, and project management.
    • Changes
      • Modification or removal of anything that could influence IT services.
        • The scope includes significant changes to architectures, processes, tools, metrics, and documentation.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Organizations sometimes mistakenly classify small projects as service requests, which can compromise your data, resulting in a negative impact to the perceived value of the service desk.

    Separate incidents and service requests for increased customer service and better-defined SLAs

    Defining the differences between service requests and incidents is not just for reporting purposes. It also has a major impact on how service is delivered.

    Incidents are unexpected disruptions to normal business processes and require attempts to restore services as soon as possible (e.g. the printer is not working).

    Service requests are tasks that don’t involve something that is broken or has an immediate impact on services. They do not require immediate resolution and can typically be scheduled (e.g. new software).

    Image shows a chart on incidents and service requests.

    Focus on the big picture first to capture and streamline how your organization resolves incidents

    Image displays a flow chart to show how to organize resolving incidents.

    Document your incident management workflow to identify opportunities for improvement

    Image shows a flow cart on how to organize incident management.

    Workflow should include:

    • Ticket creation and closure
    • Triage
    • Troubleshooting
    • Escalations
    • Communications
    • Change management
    • Documentation
    • Vendor escalations

    Notes:

    • Notification and alerts should be used to set or reset expectations on delivery or resolution
    • Identify all the steps where a customer is informed and ensure we are not over or under communicating

    Collaborate to define each step of the incident management workflow

    2.1.2 Define the incident management workflow

    Estimated Time: 60 minutes

    Option 1: Whiteboard

    1. Discuss the workflow and draw it on the whiteboard.
    2. Assess whether you are using the best workflow. Modify it if necessary.
    3. Engage the team in refining the process workflow.
    4. Transfer data to Visio and add to the SOP.

    Option 2: Tabletop Exercise

    1. Distribute index cards to each member of the team.
    2. Have each person write a single task they perform on the index card. Be granular. Include the title or the name of the person responsible.
    3. Mark cards that are decision points. Use a card of a different color or use a marker to make a colored dot.
    4. Arrange the index cards in order, removing duplicates.
    5. Assess whether you are using the best workflow. Engage the team to refine it if necessary.
    6. Transfer data to Visio and add to the Service Desk SOP.

    Participants

    • Service Manager
    • Service Desk Support
    • Applications or Infrastructure Support

    What You’ll Need

    • Flip Chart Paper
    • Sticky Notes
    • Pens
    • Service Desk SOP
    • Project Summary

    Formalize the process for critical incident management to reduce organizational impact

    Discuss these elements to see how the organization will handle them.

    • Communication plan:
      • Who communicates with end users?
      • Who communicates with the executive team?
    • It’s important to separate the role of the technician trying to solve a problem with the need to communicate progress.
    • Change management:
    • Define a separate process for regular and emergency change management to ensure changes are timely and appropriate.
    • Business continuity plan:
    • Identify criteria to decide when a business continuity plan (BCP) must be implemented during a critical incident to minimize the business impact of the incident.
    • Post-mortems:
    • Formalize the process of discussing and documenting lessons learned, understanding outstanding issues, and addressing the root cause of incidents.
    • Source of incident notification:
    • Does the process change if users notify the service desk of an issue or if the systems management tools alert technicians?

    Critical incidents are high-impact, high-urgency events that put the effectiveness and timeliness of the service desk center stage.

    Build a workflow that focuses on quickly bringing together the right people to resolve the incident and reduces the chances of recurrence.

    Document your critical incident management workflow to identify opportunities for improvement

    Image shows a flow cart on how to organize critical incident management.

    Workflow should include:

    • Ticket creation and closure
    • Triage
    • Troubleshooting
    • Escalations
    • Communications plan
    • Change management
    • Disaster recovery or business continuity plan
    • Documentation
    • Vendor escalations
    • Post-mortem

    Collaborate to define each step of the critical incident management workflow

    2.1.3 Define the critical incident management workflow

    Estimated Time: 60 minutes

    Option 1: Whiteboard

    1. Discuss the workflow and draw it on the whiteboard.
    2. Assess whether you are using the best workflow. Modify it if necessary.
    3. Engage the team in refining the process workflow.
    4. Transfer data to Visio and add to the SOP.

    Option 2: Tabletop Exercise

    1. Distribute index cards to each member of the team.
    2. Have each person write a single task they perform on the index card. Be granular. Include the title or the name of the person responsible.
    3. Mark cards that are decision points. Use a card of a different color or use a marker to make a colored dot.
    4. Arrange the index cards in order, removing duplicates.
    5. Assess whether you are using the best workflow. Engage the team to refine it if necessary.
    6. Transfer data to Visio and add to the Service Desk SOP.

    Participants

    • Service Manager
    • Service Desk Support
    • Applications or Infrastructure Support

    What You’ll Need

    • Flip Chart Paper
    • Sticky Notes
    • Pens
    • Service Desk SOP

    Establish a critical incident management communication plan

    When it comes to communicating during major incidents, it’s important to get the information just right. Users don’t want too little, they don’t want too much, they just want what’s relevant to them, and they want that information at the right time.

    As an IT professional, you may not have a background in communications, but it becomes an important part of your job. Broad guidelines for good communication during a critical incident are:

    1. Communicate as broadly as the impact of your incident requires.
    2. Communicate as much detail as a specific audience requires, but no more than necessary.
    3. Communicate as far ahead of impact as possible.

    Why does communication matter?

    Sending the wrong message, at the wrong time, to the wrong stakeholders, can result in:

    • Drop in customer satisfaction.
    • Wasted time and resources from multiple customers contacting you with the same issue.
    • Dissatisfied executives kept in the dark.
    • Increased resolution time if the relevant providers and IT staff are not informed soon enough to help.

    Info-Tech Insight

    End users understand that sometimes things break. What’s important to them is that (1) you don’t repeatedly have the same problem, (2) you keep them informed, and (3) you give them enough notice when their systems will be impacted and when service will be returned.

    Automate communication to save time and deliver consistent messaging to the right stakeholders

    In the middle of resolving a critical incident, the last thing you have time for is worrying about crafting a good message. Create a series of templates to save time by providing automated, tailored messages for each stage of the process that can be quickly altered and sent out to the right stakeholders.

    Once templates are in place, when the incident occurs, it’s simply a matter of:

    1. Choosing the relevant template.
    2. Updating recipients and messaging if necessary.
    3. Adding specific, relevant data and fields.
    4. Sending the message.

    When to communicate?

    Tell users the information they need to know when they need to know it. If a user is directly impacted, tell them that. If the incident does not directly affect the user, the communication may lead to decreased customer satisfaction or failure to pay attention to future relevant messaging.

    What to say?

    • Keep messaging short and to the point.
    • Only say what you know for sure.
    • Provide only the details the audience needs to know to take any necessary action or steps on their side and no more. There’s no need to provide details on the reason for the failure before it’s resolved, though this can be done after resolution and restoration of service.

    You’ll need distinct messages for distinct audiences. For example:

    • To incident resolvers: “Servers X through Y in ABC Location are failing intermittently. Please test the servers and all the connections to determine the exact cause so we can take corrective action ASAP.”
    • To the IT department head: “Servers X through Y in ABC Location are failing intermittently. We are beginning tests. We will let you know when we have determined the exact cause and can give you an estimated completion time.”
    • To executives: “We’re having an issue with some servers at ABC Location. We are testing to determine the cause and will let you know the estimated completion time as soon as possible.”
    • To end users: “We are experience some service issues. We are working on a resolution diligently and will restore service as soon as possible.”

    Map out who will need to be contacted in the event of a critical incident

    2.1.4 Design the critical incident communication plan

    • Identify critical incidents that require communication.
    • Identify stakeholders who will need to be informed about each incident.
    • For each audience, determine:
      1. Frequency of communication
      2. Content of communication
    Use the sample template to the right as an example.

    Some questions to assist you:

    • Whose work will be interrupted, either by their services going down or by their workers having to drop everything to solve the incident?
    • What would happen if we didn’t notify this person?
    • What level of detail do they need?
    • How often would they want to be updated?
    Document outcomes in the Service Desk SOP. Image shows template of unplanned service outage.

    Measure and improve customer satisfaction with the use of relationship and transactional surveys

    Customer experience programs with a combination of relationship and transactional surveys tend to be more effective. Merging the two will give a wholistic picture of the customer experience.

    Relationship Surveys

    Relationship surveys focus on obtaining feedback on the overall customer experience.

    • Inform how well you are doing or where you need improvement in the broad services provided.
    • Provide a high-level perspective on the relationship between the business and IT.
    • Help with strategic improvement decisions.
    • Should be sent over a duration of time and to the entire customer base after they’ve had time to experience all the services provided by the service desk. This can be done as frequently as per quarter or on a yearly basis.
    • E.g. An annual satisfaction survey such as Info-Tech’s End User Satisfaction Diagnostic.

    Transactional Surveys

    Transactional surveys are tied to a specific interaction or transaction your end users have with a specific product or service.

    • Help with tactical improvement decisions.
    • Questions should point to a specific interaction.
    • Usually only a few questions that are quick and easy to complete following the transaction.
    • Since transactional surveys allow you to improve individual relationships, they should be sent shortly after the interaction with the service desk has occurred.
    • E.g. How satisfied are you with the way your ticket was resolved?

    Add transactional end-user surveys at ticket close to escalate unsatisfactory results

    A simple quantitative survey at the closing of a ticket can inform the service desk manager of any issues that were not resolved to the end user’s satisfaction. Take advantage of workflows to escalate poor results immediately for quick follow-up.

    Image shows example of survey question with rating.

    If a more complex survey is required, you may wish to include some of these questions:

    Please rate your overall satisfaction with the way your issue was handled (1=unsatisfactory, 5=fantastic)

    • The professionalism of the analyst.
    • The technical skills or knowledge of the analyst.
    • The timeliness of the service provided.
    • The overall service experience.

    Add an open-ended, qualitative question to put the number in context, and solicit critical feedback:

    What could the service desk have done to improve your experience?

    Define a process to respond to both negative and positive feedback

    Successful customer satisfaction programs respond effectively to both positive and negative outcomes. Late or lack of responses to negative comments may increase customer frustration, while not responding at all to the positive comments may give the perception of indifference. If customers are taking the time to fill out the survey, good or bad, they should be followed up with

    Take these steps to handle survey feedback:

    1. Assign resources to receive, read, and track responses. The entire team doesn’t need to receive every response, while a single resource may not have capacity to respond in a timely manner. Decide what makes the most sense in your environment.
    2. Respond to negative feedback: It may not be possible to respond to every customer that fills out a survey. Set guidelines for responding to negative surveys with no details on the issue; don’t spend time guessing why they were upset, simply ask the user why they were unsatisfied. The critical piece of taking advantage of the service recovery paradox is in the follow-up to the customer.
    3. Investigate and improve: Make sure you investigate the issue to ensure that it is a justified complaint or whether the issue is a symptom of another issue’s root cause. Identify remediation steps to ensure the issue does not repeat itself, and then communicate to the customer the action you have taken to improve.
    4. Act on positive feedback as well: If it’s easy for customers to provide feedback, then make room in your process for handling the positive results. Appreciate the time and effort your customers take to give kudos and use it as a tool to build a long-term relationship with that user. Saying thank you goes a long way and when customers know their time matters, they will be encouraged to fill out those surveys. This is also a good way to show what a great job the service desk team did with the interaction.

    Analyze survey feedback month over month to complement and justify metric results already in place

    When you combine the tracking and analysis of relationship and transactional survey data you will be able to dive into specific issues, identify trends and patterns, assess impact to users, and build a plan to make improvements.

    Once the survey data is centralized, categorized, and available you can start to focus on metrics. At a minimum, for transactional surveys, consider tracking:

    • Breakdown of satisfaction scores with trends over time
    • Unsatisfactory surveys that are related to incidents and service requests
    • Total surveys that have been actioned vs pending

    For relationship surveys, consider tracking:

    • Satisfaction scores by department and seniority level
    • Satisfaction with IT services, applications, and communication
    • Satisfaction with IT’s business enablement

    Scores of overall satisfaction with IT

    Image Source: Info-Tech End User Satisfaction Report

    Prioritize company-wide improvement initiatives by those that have the biggest impact to the entire customer base first and then communicate the plan to the organization using a variety of communication channels that will draw your customers in, e.g. dashboards, newsletters, email alerts.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Consider automating or using your ITSM notification system as a direct communication method to inform the service desk manager of negative survey results.

    Step 2.2: Design ticket categorization

    Image shows the steps in phase 2. Highlight is on step 2.2

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • 2.2.1 Assess ticket categorization
    • 2.2.2 Enhance ticket categories with resolution and status codes

    This step involves the following participants:

    • IT Managers
    • Service Desk Manager(s)
    • Representation from tier 2 and tier 3 specialists

    Outcomes

    The reviewed ticket categorization scheme will be easier to use and deploy more consistently, which will improve the categorization of data and the reliability of reports.

    DELIVERABLES

    • Optimized ticket categorization

    Design a ticket classification scheme to produce useful reports

    Reliable reports depend on an effective categorization scheme.

    Too many options cause confusion; too few options provide little value. As you build the classification scheme over the next few slides, let call routing and reporting requirements be your guide.

    Effective classification schemes are concise, easy to use correctly, and easy to maintain.

    Image shows example of a ticket classification scheme.

    Keep these guidelines in mind:

    • A good categorization scheme is exhaustive and mutually exclusive: there’s a place for every ticket and every ticket fits in only one place.
    • As you build your classification scheme, ensure the categories describe the actual asset or service involved based on final resolution, not how it was reported initially.
    • Pre-populate ticket templates with relevant categories to dramatically improve reporting and routing accuracy.
    • Use a tiered system to make the categories easier to navigate. Three tiers with 6-8 categories per tier provides up to 512 sub-categories, which should be enough for the most ambitious team.
    • Track only what you will use for reporting purposes. If you don’t need a report on individual kinds of laptops, don’t create a category beyond “laptops.”
    • Avoid “miscellaneous” categories. A large portion of your tickets will eventually end up there.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Don’t do it alone! Collaborate with managers in the specialized IT groups responsible for root-cause analysis to develop a categorization scheme that makes sense for them.

    The first approach to categorization breaks down the IT portfolio into asset types

    WHY SHOULD I START WITH ASSETS?

    Start with asset types if asset management and configuration management processes figure prominently in your practice or on your service management implementation roadmap.

    Image displays example of asset types and how to categorize them.

    Building the Categories

    Ask these questions:

    • Type: What kind of asset am I working on?
    • Category: What general asset group am I working on?
    • Subcategory: What particular asset am I working on?

    Need to make quick progress? Use Info-Tech Research Group’s Service Desk Ticket Categorization Schemes template.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Think about how you will use the data to determine which components need to be included in reports. If components won’t be used for reporting, routing, or warranty, reporting down to the component level adds little value.

    The second approach to categorization breaks down the IT portfolio into types of services

    WHY SHOULD I START WITH SERVICES?

    Start with asset services if service management generally figures prominently in your practice, especially service catalog management.

    Image displays example of service types and how to categorize them.

    Building the Categories

    Ask these questions:

    • Type: What kind of service am I working on?
    • Category: What general service group am I working on?
    • Subcategory: What particular service am I working on?

    Need to make quick progress? Use Info-Tech Research Group’s Service Desk Ticket Categorization Schemes template.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Remember, ticket categories are not your only source of reports. Enhance the classification scheme with resolution and status codes for more granular reporting.

    Improve the categorization scheme to enhance routing and reporting

    2.2.1 Assess whether the service desk can improve its ticket categorization

    1. As a group, review existing categories, looking for duplicates and designations that won’t affect ticket routing. Reconcile duplicates and remove non-essential categories.
    2. As a group, re-do the categories, ensuring that the new categorization scheme will meet the reporting requirements outlined earlier.
      • Are categories exhaustive and mutually exclusive?
      • Is the tier simple and easy to use (i.e. 3 tiers x 8 categories)?
    3. Test against recent tickets to ensure you have the right categories.
    4. Record the ticket categorization scheme in the Service Desk Ticket Categorization Schemes template.

    A screenshot of the Service Desk Ticket Categorization Schemes template.

    Participants

    • Service Desk Manager
    • Service Desk Agents

    What You’ll Need

    • Flip Chart
    • Whiteboard
    • Service Desk Ticket Categorization Scheme

    Enhance the classification scheme with resolution and status codes for more granular reporting

    Resolution codes differ from detailed resolution notes.

    • A resolution code is a field within the ticketing system that should be updated at ticket close to categorize the primary way the ticket was resolved.
    • This is important for reporting purposes as it adds another level to the categorization scheme and can help you identify knowledgebase article candidates, training needs, or problems.

    Ticket statuses are a helpful field for both IT and end users to identify the current status of the ticket and to initiate workflows.

    • The most common statuses are open, pending/in progress, resolved, and closed (note the difference between resolved and closed).
    • Waiting on user or waiting on vendor are also helpful statuses to stop the clock when awaiting further information or input.

    Common Examples:

    Resolution Codes

    • How to/training
    • Configuration change
    • Upgrade
    • Installation
    • Data import/export/change
    • Information/research
    • Reboot

    Status Fields

    • Declined
    • Open
    • Closed
    • Waiting on user
    • Waiting on vendor
    • Reopened by user

    Identify and document resolution and status codes

    2.2.2 Enhance ticket categories with resolution codes

    Discuss:

    • How can we use resolution information to enhance reporting?
    • Are current status fields telling the right story?
    • Are there other requirements like project linking?

    Draft:

    1. Write out proposed resolution codes and status fields and critically assess their value.
    2. Resolutions can be further broken down by incident and service request if desired.
    3. Test resolution codes against a few recent tickets.
    4. Record the ticket categorization scheme in the Service Desk SOP.

    Participants

    • CIO
    • Service Desk Manager
    • Service Desk Technician(s)

    What You’ll Need

    • Whiteboard or Flip Chart
    • Markers

    Step 2.3: Design incident escalation and prioritization

    Image shows the steps in phase 2. Highlight is on step 2.3.

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • 2.3.1 Build a small number of rules to facilitate prioritization
    • 2.3.2 Define escalation rules
    • 2.3.3 Define automated escalations
    • 2.3.4 Provide guidance to each tier around escalation steps and times

    This step involves the following participants:

    • IT Managers
    • Service Desk Manager(s)
    • Representation from tier 2 and tier 3 specialists

    Outcomes

    The reviewed ticket escalation and prioritization will streamline queue management, improve the quality of escalations, and ensure agents work on the right tickets at the right time.

    DELIVERABLES

    • Optimized ticket prioritization scheme
    • Guidelines for ticket escalations
    • List of automatic escalations

    Build a ticket prioritization matrix to make escalation assessment less subjective

    Most IT leaders agree that prioritization is one of the most difficult aspects of IT in general. Set priorities based on business needs first.

    Mission-critical systems or problems that affect many people should always come first (i.e. Severity Level 1).

    The bulk of reported problems, however, are often individual problems with desktop PCs (i.e. Severity Level 3 or 4).

    Some questions to consider when deciding on problem severity include:

    • How is productivity affected?
    • How many users are affected?
    • How many systems are affected?
    • How critical are the affected systems to the organization?

    Decide how many severity levels the organization needs the service desk to have. Four levels of severity are ideal for most organizations.

    Image shows example ticket prioritization matrix

    Collect the ticket prioritization scheme in one diagram to ensure service support aligns to business requirements

    Image shows example ticket prioritization matrix

    Prioritize incidents based on severity and urgency to foreground critical issues

    2.3.1 Build a clearly defined priority scheme

    Estimated Time: 60 minutes

    1. Decide how many levels of severity are appropriate for your organization.
    2. Build a prioritization matrix, breaking down priority levels by impact and urgency.
    3. Build out the definitions of impact and urgency to complete the prioritization matrix.
    4. Run through examples of each priority level to make sure everyone is on the same page.

    Image shows example ticket prioritization matrix

    Document in the SOP

    Participants

    • Service Managers
    • Service Desk Support
    • Applications or Infrastructure Support

    What You'll Need

    • Flip Chart Paper
    • Sticky Notes
    • Pens
    • Service Desk SOP

    Example of outcome from 2.3.1

    Define response and resolution targets for each priority level to establish service-level objectives for service support

    Image shows example of response and resolution targets.

    Build clear rules to help agents determine when to escalate

    2.3.2 Assign response, resolution, and escalation times to each priority level

    Estimated Time: 60 minutes

    Instructions:

    For each incident priority level, define the associated:

    1. Response time – time from when incident record is created to the time the service desk acknowledges to the customer that their ticket has been received and assigned.
    2. Resolution time – time from when the incident record is created to the time that the customer has been advised that their problem has been resolved.
    3. Escalation time – maximum amount of time that a ticket should be worked on without progress before being escalated to someone else.

    Participants

    • Service Managers
    • Service Desk Support
    • Applications or Infrastructure Support

    What You'll Need

    • Flip Chart Paper
    • Sticky Notes
    • Pens

    Image shows example of response and resolution targets

    Use the table on the previous slide as a guide.

    Discuss the possible root causes for escalation issues

    WHY IS ESCALATION IMPORTANT?

    Escalation is not about admitting defeat, but about using your resources properly.

    Defining procedures for escalation reduces the amount of time the service desk spends troubleshooting before allocating the incident to a higher service tier. This reduces the mean time to resolve and increases end-user satisfaction.

    You can correlate escalation paths to ticket categories devised in step 2.2.

    Image shows example on potential root causes for escalation issues.

    Build decision rights to help agents determine when to escalate

    2.3.3 Provide guidance to each tier around escalation steps and times

    Estimated Time: 60 minutes

    Instructions

    1. For each support tier, define escalation rules for troubleshooting (steps that each tier should take before escalation).
    2. For each support tier, define maximum escalation times (maximum amount of time to work on a ticket without progress before escalating).
    Example of outcome from step 2.3.3 to determine when to escalate issues.

    Create a list of application specialists to get the escalation right the first time

    2.3.4 Define automated escalations

    Estimated Time: 60 minutes

    1. Identify applications that will require specialists for troubleshooting or access rights.
    2. Identify primary and secondary specialists for each application.
    3. Identify vendors that will receive escalations either immediately or after troubleshooting.
    4. Set up application groups in the service desk tool.
    5. Set up workflows in the service desk tool where appropriate.
    6. Document the automated escalations in the categorization scheme developed in step 2.2 and in the Service Desk Roles and Responsibilities Guide.

    A screenshot of the Service Desk Roles and Responsibilities Guide

    Participants

    • Service Managers
    • Service Desk Support
    • Applications or Infrastructure Support

    What You'll Need

    • Flip Chart Paper
    • Sticky Notes
    • Pens

    Phase 3

    Design Request Fulfilment Processes

    Step 3.1: Build request workflows

    Image shows the steps in phase 3. Highlight is on step 3.1.

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • 3.1.1 Distinguish between requests and small projects
    • 3.1.2 Define service requests with SLAs
    • 3.1.3 Build and critique request workflows

    This step involves the following participants:

    • IT Managers
    • Service Desk Manager(s)
    • Representation from tier 2 and tier 3 specialists

    Outcomes

    Workflows for service requests will improve the consistency and quality of service delivery and prepare the service desk to negotiate reliable service levels with the organization.

    DELIVERABLES

    • Workflows for the most common service requests
    • An estimated service level for each service request
    • Request vs. project criteria

    Standardize service requests for more efficient delivery

    Definitions:

    • An incident is an unexpected disruption to normal business processes and requires attempts to restore service as soon as possible (e.g. printer not working).
    • A service request is a request where nothing is broken or impacting a service and typically can be scheduled rather than requiring immediate resolution (e.g. new software application).
    • Service requests are repeatable, predictable, and easier to commit to SLAs.
    • By committing to SLAs, expectations can be set for users and business units for service fulfillment.
    • Workflows for service requests should be documented and reviewed to ensure consistency of fulfillment.
    • Documentation should be created for service request procedures that are complex.
    • Efficiencies can be created through automation such as with software deployment.
    • All service requests can be communicated through a self-service portal or service catalog.

    PREPARE A FUTURE SERVICE CATALOG

    Standardize requests to develop a consistent offering and prepare for a future service catalog.

    Document service requests to identify time to fulfill and approvals.

    Identify which service requests can be auto-approved and which will require a workflow to gain approval.

    Document workflows and analyze them to identify ways to improve SLAs. If any approvals are interrupting technical processes, rearrange them so that approvals happen before the technical team is involved.

    Determine support levels for each service offering and ensure your team can sustain them.

    Where it makes sense, automate delivery of services such as software deployment.

    Distinguish between service requests and small projects to ensure agents and end users follow the right process

    The distinction between service requests and small projects has two use cases, which are two sides of the same resourcing issue.

    • Service desk managers need to understand the difference to ensure the right approval process is followed. Typically, projects have more stringent intake requirements than requests do.
    • PMOs need to understand the difference to ensure the right people are doing the work and that small, frequent changes are standardized, automated, and taken out of the project list.

    What’s the difference between a service request and a small project?

    • The key differences involve resource scope, frequency, and risk.
    • Requests are likely to require fewer resources than projects, be fulfilled more often, and involve less risk.
    • Requests are typically done by tier 1 and 2 employees throughout the IT organization.
    • A request can turn into a small project if the scope of the request grows beyond the bounds of a normal request.

    Example: A mid-sized organization goes on a hiring blitz and needs to onboard 150 new employees in one quarter. Submitting and scheduling 150 requests for onboarding new employees would require much more time and resources.

    Projects are different from service requests and have different criteria

    A project, by terminology, is a temporary endeavor planned around producing a specific organizational or business outcome.

    Common Characteristics of Projects:

    • Time sensitive, temporary, one-off.
    • Uncertainty around how to create the unique thing, product, or service that is the project’s goal.
    • Non-repetitive work and sizeable enough to introduce heightened risk and complexity.
    • Strategic focus, business case-informed capital funding, and execution activities driven by a charter.
    • Introduces change to the organization.
    • Multiple stakeholders involved and cross-functional resourcing.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Projects require greater risk, effort, and resources than a service request and should be redirected to the PMO.

    Standard service requests vs. non-standard service requests: criteria to make them distinct

    • If there is no differentiation between standard and non-standard requests, those tickets can easily move into the backlog, growing it very quickly.
    • Create a process to easily identify non-standard requests when they enter the ticket queue to ensure customers are made aware of any delay of service, especially if it is a product or service currently not offered. This will give time for any approvals or technical solutioning that may need to occur.
    • Take recurring non-standard requests and make them standard. This is a good way to determine if there are any gaps in services offered and another vehicle to understand what your customers want.

    Standard Requests

    • Very common requests, delivered on an on-going basis
    • Defined process
    • Measured in hours or days
    • Uses service catalog, if it exists
    • Formalized and should already be documented
    • The time to deal with the request is defined

    Non-Standard Requests

    • Higher level complexity than standard requests
    • Cannot be fulfilled via service catalog
    • No defined process
    • Not supplied by questions that Service Request Definition (SRD) offers
    • Product or service is not currently offered, and it may need time for technical review, additional approvals, and procurement processes

    The right questions can help you distinguish between standard requests, non-standard requests, and projects

    Where do we draw the line between a standard and non-standard request and a project?

    The service desk can’t and shouldn’t distinguish between requests and projects on its own. Instead, engage stakeholders to determine where to draw the line.

    Whatever criteria you choose, define them carefully.

    Be pragmatic: there is no single best set of criteria and no single best definition for each criterion. The best criteria and definitions will be the ones that work in your organizational context.

    Common distinguishing factors and thresholds:

    Image shows table of the common distinguishing factors and thresholds.

    Distinguish between standard and non-standard service requests and projects

    3.1.1 Distinguish between service requests and projects

    1. Divide the group into two small teams.
    2. Each team will brainstorm examples of service requests and small projects.
    3. Identify factors and thresholds that distinguish between the two groups of items.
    4. Bring the two groups together and discuss the two sets of criteria.
    5. Consolidate one set of criteria that will help make the distinction between projects and service requests.
    6. Capture the table in the Service Desk SOP.

    Image shows blank template of the common distinguishing factors and thresholds.

    Participants

    • Service Desk Manager
    • Service Desk Agents

    What You'll Need

    • Service Desk SOP
    • Flip Chart
    • Whiteboard

    Distinguishing factors and thresholds

    Don’t standardize request fulfilment processes alone

    Everyone in IT contributes to the fulfilment of requests, but do they know it?

    New service desk managers sometimes try to standardize request fulfilment processes on their own only to encounter either apathy or significant resistance to change.

    Moving to a tiered generalist service desk with a service-oriented culture, a high first-tier generalist resolution rate, and collaborative T2 and T3 specialists can be a big change. It is critical to get the request workflows right.

    Don’t go it alone. Engage a core team of process champions from all service support. With executive support, the right process building exercises can help you overcome resistance to change.

    Consider running the process building activities in this project phase in a working session or a workshop setting.

    Info-Tech Insight

    If they build it, they will come. Service desk improvement is an exercise in organizational change that crosses IT disciplines. Organizations that fail to engage IT specialists from other silos often encounter resistance to change that jeopardizes the process improvements they are trying to make. Overcome resistance by highlighting how process changes will benefit different groups in IT and solicit the feedback of specialists who can affect or be affected by the changes.

    Define standard service requests with SLAs and workflows

    WHY DO I NEED WORKFLOWS?

    Move approvals out of technical IT processes to make them more efficient. Evaluate all service requests to see where auto-approvals make sense. Where approvals are required, use tools and workflows to manage the process.

    Example:

    Image is an example of SLAs and workflows.

    Approvals can be the main roadblock to fulfilling service requests

    Image is example of workflow approvals.

    Review the general standard service request and inquiry fulfillment processes

    As standard service requests should follow standard, repeatable, and predictable steps to fulfill, they can be documented with workflows.

    Image is a flow chart of service and inquiry request processes.

    Review the general standard service request and inquiry fulfillment processes

    Ensure there is a standard and predictable methodology for assessing non-standard requests; inevitably those requests may still cause delay in fulfillment.

    Create a process to ensure reasonable expectations of delivery can be set with the end user and then identify what technology requests should become part of the existing standard offerings.

    Image is a flowchart of non-standard request processes

    Document service requests to ensure consistent delivery and communicate requirements to users

    3.1.2 Define service requests with SLAs

    1. On a flip chart, list standard service requests.
    2. Identify time required to fulfill, including time to schedule resources.
    3. Identify approvals required; determine if approvals can be automated through defining roles.
    4. Discuss opportunities to reduce SLAs or automate, but recognize that this may not happen right away.
    5. Discuss plans to communicate SLAs to the business units, recognizing that some users may take a bit of time to adapt to the new SLAs.
    6. Work toward improving SLAs as new opportunities for process change occur.
    7. Document SLAs in the Service Desk SOP and update as SLAs change.
    8. Build templates in the service desk tool that encapsulate workflows and routing, SLAs, categorization, and resolution.

    Participants

    • Service Desk Managers
    • Service Desk Agents

    What You'll Need

    • Service Desk SOP
    • Flip Chart
    • Whiteboard

    Info-Tech Insight

    These should all be scheduled services. Anything that is requested as a rush needs to be marked as a higher urgency or priority to track end users who need training on the process.

    Analyze service request workflows to improve service delivery

    3.1.3 Build and critique request workflows

    1. Divide the group into small teams.
    2. Each team will choose one service request from the list created in the previous module and then draw the workflow. Include decision points and approvals.
    3. Discuss availability and technical support:
      • Can the service be fulfilled during regular business hours or 24x7?
      • Is technical support and application access available during regular business hours or 24x7?
    4. Reconvene and present workflows to the group.
    5. Document workflows in Visio and add to the Service Desk SOP. Where appropriate, enter workflows in the service desk tool.

    Critique workflows for efficiencies and effectiveness:

    • Do the workflows support the SLAs identified in the previous exercise?
    • Are the workflows efficient?
    • Is the IT staff consistently following the same workflow?
    • Are approvals appropriate? Is there too much bureaucracy or can some approvals be removed? Can they be preapproved?
    • Are approvals interrupting technical processes? If so, can they be moved?

    Participants

    • Service Desk Managers
    • Service Desk Agents

    What You'll Need

    • Service Desk SOP
    • Project Summary
    • Flip Chart
    • Whiteboard

    Step 3.2: Build a targeted knowledgebase

    Image shows the steps in phase 3. Highlight is on step 3.2.

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • 3.2.1 Design knowledge management processes
    • 3.2.2 Create actionable knowledgebase articles

    This step involves the following participants:

    • IT Managers
    • Service Desk Manager(s)
    • Representation from tier 2 and tier 3 specialists

    Outcomes

    The section will introduce service catalogs and get the organization to envision what self-service tools it might include.

    DELIVERABLES

    • Knowledgebase policy and process

    A knowledgebase is an essential tool in the service management toolbox

    Knowledge Management

    Gathering, analyzing, storing & sharing knowledge to reduce the need to rediscover known solutions.

    Knowledgebase

    Organized repository of IT best practices and knowledge gained from practical experiences.

    • End-User KB
    • Give end users a chance to resolve simple issues themselves without submitting a ticket.

    • Internal KB
    • Shared resource for service desk staff and managers to share and use knowledge.

    Use the knowledgebase to document:

    • Steps for pre-escalation troubleshooting.
    • Known errors.
    • Workarounds or solutions to recurring issues.
    • Solutions that require research or complex troubleshooting.
    • Incidents that have many root causes. Start with the most frequent solution and work toward less likely issues.

    Draw on organizational goals to define the knowledge transfer target state

    Image is Info-Tech’s Knowledge Transfer Maturity Model
    *Source: McLean & Company, 2013; N=120

    It’s better to start small than to have nothing at all

    Service desk teams are often overwhelmed by the idea of building and maintaining a comprehensive integrated knowledgebase that covers an extensive amount of information.

    Don’t let this idea stop you from building a knowledgebase! It takes time to build a comprehensive knowledgebase and you must start somewhere.

    Start with existing documentation or knowledge that depends on the expertise of only a few people and is easy to document and you will already see the benefits.

    Then continue to build and improve from there. Eventually, knowledge management will be a part of the culture.

    Engage the team to build a knowledgebase targeted on your most important incidents and requests

    WHERE DO I START?

    Inventory and consolidate existing documentation, then evaluate it for audience relevancy, accuracy, and usability. Use the exercise and the next slides to develop a knowledgebase template.

    Produce a plan to improve the knowledgebase.

    • Identify the current top five or ten incidents from the service desk reports and create related knowledgebase articles.
    • Evaluate for end-user self-service or technician resolution.
    • Note any resolutions that require access rights to servers.
    • Assign documentation creation tasks for the knowledgebase to individual team members each week.
    • Apply only one incident per article.
    • Set goals for each technician to submit one or two meaningful articles per month.
    • Assign a knowledge manager to monitor creation and edit and maintain the database.
    • Set policy to drive currency of the knowledgebase. See the Service Desk SOP for an example of a workable knowledge policy.

    Use a phased approach to build a knowledgebase

    Image is an example of a phased approach to build a knowledge base

    Use a quarterly, phased approach to continue to build and maintain your knowledgebase

    Continual Knowledgebase Maintenance:

    • Once a knowledgebase is in place, future articles should be written using established templates.
    • Articles should be regularly reviewed and monitored for usage. Outdated information will be retired and archived.
    • Ticket trend analysis should be done on an ongoing basis to identify new articles.
    • A proactive approach will anticipate upcoming issues based on planned upgrades and maintenance or other changes, and document resolution steps in knowledgebase articles ahead of time.

    Every Quarter:

    1. Conduct a ticket trend analysis. Identify the most important and common tickets.
    2. Review the knowledgebase to identify relevant articles that need to be revised or written.
    3. Use data from knowledge management tool to track expiring content and lesser used articles.
    4. Assign the task of writing articles to all IT staff members.
    5. Build and revise ticket templates for incident and service requests.

    Assign a knowledge manager role to ensure accountability for knowledgebase maintenance

    Assign a knowledge manager to monitor creation and edit and maintain database.

    Knowledge Manager/Owner Role:

    • Has overall responsibility for the knowledgebase.
    • Ensures content is consistent and maintains standards.
    • Regularly monitors and updates the list of issues that should be added to the knowledgebase.
    • Regularly reviews existing knowledgebase articles to ensure KB is up to date and flags content to retire or review.
    • Assigns content creation tasks.
    • Optimizes knowledgebase structure and organization.
    • See Info-Tech’s knowledge manager role description if you need a hand defining this position.

    The knowledge manager role will likely be a role assigned to an existing resource rather than a dedicated position.

    Develop a template to ensure knowledgebase articles are easy to read and write

    A screenshot of the Knowledgebase Article Template

    QUICK TIPS

    • Use non-technical language whenever possible to help less-technical readers.
    • Identify error messages and use screenshots where it makes sense.
    • Take advantage of social features like voting buttons to increase use.
    • Use Info-Tech’s Knowledge Base Article Template to get you started.

    Analyze the necessary features for your knowledgebase and compare them against existing tools

    Service desk knowledgebases range in complexity from simple FAQs to fully integrated software suites.

    Options include:

    • Article search with negative and positive filters.
    • Tagging, with the option to have keywords generate top matches.
    • Role-based permissions (to prevent unauthorized deletions).
    • Ability to turn a ticket resolution into a knowledgebase article (typically only available if knowledgebase tool is part of the service desk tool).
    • Natural language search.
    • Partitioning so relevant articles only appear for specific audiences.
    • Editorial workflow management.
    • Ability to set alerts for scheduled article review.
    • Article reporting (most viewed, was it useful?).
    • Rich text fields for attaching screenshots.

    Determine which features your organization needs and check to see if your tools have them.

    For more information on knowledgebase improvement, refer to Info-Tech’s Optimize the Service Desk With a Shift-Left Strategy.

    Document your knowledge management maintenance workflow to identify opportunities for improvement

    Workflow should include:

    • How you will identify top articles that need to be written
    • How you will ensure articles remain relevant
    • How you will assign new articles to be written, inclusive of peer review
    Image of flowchart of knowledgebase maintenance process.

    Design knowledgebase management processes

    3.2.1 Design knowledgebase management processes

    1. Assign a knowledge manager to monitor creation and edit and maintain the database. See Info-Tech’s knowledge manager role description if you need a hand defining this position.
    2. Discuss how you can use the service desk tool to integrate the knowledgebase with incident management, request fulfilment, and self-service processes.
    3. Discuss the suitability of a quarterly process to build and edit articles for a target knowledgebase that covers your most important incidents and requests.
    4. Set knowledgebase creation targets for tier 1, 2, and 3 analysts.
    5. Identify relevant performance metrics.
    6. Brainstorm elements that might be used as an incentive program to encourage the creation of knowledgebase articles and knowledge sharing more generally.
    7. Set policy to drive currency of knowledgebase. See the Service Desk SOP for an example of a workable knowledge policy.

    Participants

    • Service Desk Manager
    • Service Desk Agents

    What You’ll Need

    • Service Desk SOP
    • Flip Chart
    • Whiteboard

    Create actionable knowledgebase articles

    3.2.2 Run a knowledgebase working group

    Write and critique knowledgebase articles.

    1. On a whiteboard, build a list of potential knowledgebase articles divided by audience: Technician or End User.
    2. Each team member chooses one topic and spends 20 minutes writing.
    3. Each team member either reads the article and has the team critique or passes to the technician to the right for peer review. If there are many participants, break into smaller groups.
    4. Set a goal with the team for how, when, and how often knowledgebase articles will be created.
    5. Capture knowledgebase processes in the Service Desk SOP.

    Audience: Technician

    • Password update
    • VPN printing
    • Active directory – policy, procedures, naming conventions
    • Cell phones
    • VPN client and creation set-up

    Audience: End users

    • Set up email account
    • Password creation policy
    • Voicemail – access, change greeting, activities
    • Best practices for virus, malware, phishing attempts
    • Windows 10 tips and tricks

    Participants

    • Service Desk Manager
    • Service Desk Agents

    What You’ll Need

    • Service Desk SOP
    • Flip Chart
    • Whiteboard

    Step 3.3: Prepare for a self-service portal project

    Image shows the steps in phase 3. Highlight is on step 3.3.

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • 3.3.1 Develop self-service tools for the end user
    • 3.3.2 Make a plan for creating or improving the self-service portal

    This step involves the following participants:

    • IT Managers
    • Service Desk Manager(s)
    • Representation from tier 2 and tier 3 specialists

    Outcomes

    The section prepares you to tackle a self-service portal project once the service desk standardization is complete.

    DELIVERABLES

    • High-level activities to create a self-service portal

    Design the self-service portal with the users’ computer skills in mind

    A study by the OECD offers a useful reminder of one of usability’s most hard-earned lessons: you are not the user.

    • There is an important difference between IT professionals and the average user that’s even more damaging to your ability to predict what will be a good self-service tool: skills in using computers, the internet, and technology in general.
    • An international research study explored the computer skills of 215,942 people aged 16-65 in 33 countries.
    • The results show that across 33 rich countries, only 5% of the population has strong computer-related abilities and only 33% of people can complete medium-complexity computer tasks.
    • End users are skilled, they just don’t have the same level of comfort with computers as the average IT professional. Design your self-service tools with that fact in mind.
    Image is of a graph showing the ability of computer skills from age 16-65 among various countries.

    Take an incremental and iterative approach to developing your self-service portal

    Use a web portal to offer self-serve functionality or provide FAQ information to your customers to start.

    • Don’t build from scratch. Ideally, use the functionality included with your ITSM tool.
    • If your ITSM tool doesn’t have an adequate self-service portal functionality, then harness other tools that IT already uses. Common examples include Microsoft SharePoint and Google Forms.
    • Make it as easy as possible to access the portal:
      • Deploy an app to managed devices or put the app in your app store.
      • Create a shortcut on people’s start menus or home screens.
      • Print the URL on swag such as mousepads.
    • Follow Info-Tech’s approach to developing your user facing service catalog.

    Some companies use vending machines as a form of self serve. Users can enter their purchase code and “buy” a thin client, mouse, keyboard, software, USB keys, tablet, headphones, or loaners.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Building the basics first will provide your users with immediate value. Incrementally add new features to your portal.

    Optimize the portal: self-service should be faster and more convenient than the alternative

    Design the portal by demand, not supply

    Don’t build a portal framed around current offerings and capabilities just for the sake of it. Build the portal based on what your users want and need if you want them to use it.

    Make user experience a top priority

    The portal should be designed for users to self-serve, and thus self-service must be seamless, clear, and attractive to users.

    Speak your users’ language

    Keep in mind that users may not have high technical literacy or be familiar with terminology that you find commonplace. Use terms that are easy to understand.

    Appeal to both clickers and searchers

    Ensure that users can find what they’re looking for both by browsing the site and by using search functionality.

    Use one central portal for all departments

    If multiple departments (i.e. HR, Finance) use or will use a portal, set up a shared portal so that users won’t have to guess where to go to ask for help.

    You won’t know unless you test

    You will know how to navigate the portal better than anyone, but that doesn’t mean it’s intuitive for a new user. Test the portal with users to collect and incorporate feedback.

    Self-service portal examples (1/2)

    Image is of an example of the self-service portal

    Image source: Cherwell Service Management

    Self-service examples (2/2)

    Image is of an example of the self-service portal

    Image source: Team Dynamix

    Keep the end-user facing knowledgebase relevant with workflows, multi-device access, and social features

    Workflows:

    • Easily manage peer reviews and editorial and relevance review.
    • Enable links and importing between tickets and knowledgebase articles.
    • Enable articles to appear based on ticket content.

    Multi-device access:

    • Encourage users to access self-service.
    • Enable technicians to solve problems from anywhere.

    Social features:

    • Display most popular articles first to solve trending issues.
    • Enable voting to improve usability of articles.
    • Allow collaboration on self-service.

    For more information on building self-service portal, refer to Info-Tech’s Optimize the Service Desk with a Shift-Left Strategy

    Draft a high-level project plan for a self-service portal project

    3.3.1 Draft a high-level project plan for a self-service portal project

    1. Identify stakeholders who can contribute to the project.
      • Who will help with FAQ creation?
      • Who can design the self-service portal?
      • Who needs to sign off on the project?
    2. Identify the high-level tasks that need to be done.
      • How many FAQs need to be created?
      • How will we design the service catalog’s web portal?
      • What might a phased approach look like?
      • How can we break down the project into design, build, and implementation tasks?
      • What is the rough timeline for these tasks?
    3. Capture the high-level activities in the Service Desk Roadmap.

    Participants

    • Service Desk Manager
    • Service Desk Agents

    What You’ll Need

    • Flip Chart
    • Whiteboard
    • Implementation Roadmap

    Once you have a service portal, you can review the business requirements for a service catalog

    A service catalog is a communications device that lists the IT services offered by an organization. The service catalog is designed to enable the creation of a self-service portal for the end user. The portal augments the service desk so analysts can spend time managing incidents and providing technical support.

    The big value comes from workflows:

    • Improved economics and a means to measure the costs to serve over time.
    • Incentive for adoption because things work better.
    • Abstracts delivery from offer to serve so you can outsource, insource, crowdsource, slow, speed, reassign, and cover absences without involving the end user.

    There are three types of catalogs:

    • Static:Informational only, so can be a basic website.
    • Routing and workflow: Attached to service desk tool.
    • Workflow and e-commerce: Integrated with service desk tool and ERP system.
    Image is an example of service catalog

    Image courtesy of University of Victoria

    Understand the time and effort involved in building a service catalog

    A service catalog will streamline IT service delivery, but putting one together requires a significant investment. Service desk standardization comes first.

    • Workflows and back-end services must be in place before setting up a service catalog.
    • Think of the catalog as just the delivery mechanism for service you currently provide. If they aren’t running well and delivery is not consistent, you don’t want to advertise SLAs and options.
    • Service catalogs require maintenance.
    • It’s not a one-time investment – service catalogs must be kept up to date to be useful.
    • Service catalog building requires input from VIPs.
    • Architects and wordsmiths are not the only ones that spend effort on the service catalog. Leadership from IT and the business also provide input on policy and content.

    Sample Service Catalog Efforts

    • A college with 17 IT staff spent one week on a simple service catalog.
    • A law firm with 110 IT staff spent two months on a service catalog project.
    • A municipal government with 300 IT people spent over seven months and has yet to complete the project.
    • A financial organization with 2,000 IT people has spent seven months on service catalog automation alone! The whole project has taken multiple years.

    “I would say a client with 2,000 users and an IT department with a couple of hundred, then you're looking at six months before you have the catalog there.”

    – Service Catalog Implementation Specialist,

    Health Services

    Draft a high-level project plan for a self-service portal project

    3.2.2 Make a plan for creating or improving the self-service portal

    Identify stakeholders who can contribute to the project.

    • Who will help with FAQs creation?
    • Who can design the self-service portal?
    • Who needs to sign off on the project?

    Evaluate tool options.

    • Will you stick with your existing tool or invest in a new tool?

    Identify the high-level tasks that need to be done.

    • How will we design the web portal?
    • What might a phased approach look like?
    • What is the rough timeline for these tasks?
    • How many FAQs need to be created?
    • Will we have a service catalog, and what type?

    Document the plan and tasks in the Service Desk Roadmap.

    Examples of publicly posted service catalogs:

    University of Victoria is an example of a catalog that started simple and now includes multiple divisions, notifications, systems status, communications, e-commerce, incident registration, and more.

    Indiana University is a student, faculty, and staff service catalog and self-service portal that goes beyond IT services.

    If you are ready to start building a service catalog, use Info-Tech’s Design and Build a User-Facing Service Catalog blueprint to get started.

    Phase 4

    Plan the Implementation of the Service Desk

    Step 4.1: Build communication plan

    Image shows the steps in phase 4. Highlight is on step 4.1.

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • 4.1.1 Create the communication plan

    This step involves the following participants:

    • CIO
    • IT Director
    • IT Managers
    • Service Desk Manager(s)
    • Representation from tier 2 and tier 3 specialists

    Outcomes

    The communication plan and project summary will help project managers outline recommendations and communicate their benefits.

    DELIVERABLES

    • Communication plan
    • Project summary

    Effectively communicate the game plan to IT to ensure the success of service desk improvements

    Communication is crucial to the integration and overall implementation of your service desk improvement.

    An effective communication plan will:

    • Gain support from management at the project proposal phase.
    • Create end-user buy-in once the program is set to launch.
    • Maintainthe presence of the program throughout the business.
    • Instill ownership throughout the business, from top-level management to new hires.

    Build a communication plan to:

    1. Communicate benefits to IT:
      • Share the standard operating procedures for training and feedback.
      • Train staff on policies as they relate to end users and ensure awareness of all policy changes.
      • As changes are implemented, continue to solicit feedback on what is and is not working and communicate adjustments as appropriate.
    2. Train technicians:
      • Make sure everyone is comfortable communicating changes to customers.
    3. Measure success:
      • Review SLAs and reports. Are you consistently meeting SLAs?
      • Is it safe to communicate with end users?

    Create your communication plan to anticipate challenges, remove obstacles, and secure buy-in

    Why:

    • What problems are you trying to solve?

    What:

    • What processes will it affect (that will affect me)?

    Who:

    • Who will be affected?
    • Who do I go to if I have issues with the new process?
    3 gears are depicted. The top gear is labelled managers with an arrow going clockwise. The middle gear is labelled technical staff with an arrow going counterclockwise. The bottom gear is labelled end users with an arrow going clockwise

    When:

    • When will this be happening?
    • When will it affect me?

    How:

    • How will these changes manifest themselves?

    Goal:

    • What is the final goal?
    • How will it benefit me?

    Create a communication plan to outline the project benefits

    Improved business satisfaction:

    • Improve confidence that the service desk can solve issues within the service-level agreement.
    • Channel incidents and requests through the service desk.
    • Escalate incidents quickly and accurately.

    Fewer recurring issues:

    • Tickets are created for every incident and categorized correctly.
    • Reports can be used for root-cause analysis.

    Increased efficiency or lower cost to serve:

    • Use FAQs to enable end users to self-solve.
    • Use knowledgebase to troubleshoot once, solve many times.
    • Cross-train to improve service consistency.

    Enhanced demand planning:

    • Trend analysis and reporting improve IT’s ability to forecast and address the demands of the business.

    Organize the information to manage the deployment of key messages

    Example of how to organize and manage key messages

    Create the communication plan

    4.1.1 Create the communication plan

    Estimated Time: 45 minutes

    Develop a stakeholder analysis.

    1. Identify everyone affected by the project.
    2. Assess their level of interest, value, and influence.
    3. Develop a communication strategy tailored to their level of engagement.

    Craft key messages tailored to each stakeholder group.

    Finalize the communication plan.

    1. Examine your roadmap and determine the most appropriate timing for communications.
    2. Assess when communications must happen with executives, business unit leaders, end users, and technicians.
    3. Identify any additional communication challenges that have come up.
    4. Identify who will send out the communications.
    5. Identify multiple methods for getting the messages out (newsletters, emails, posters, company meetings).
    6. For inspiration, you can refer to the Sample Communication Plan for the project.

    Participants

    • CIO
    • IT Managers
    • Service Desk Manager
    • Service Desk Agents

    Step 4.2: Build implementation roadmap

    Image shows the steps in phase 4. Highlight is on step 4.2.

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • 4.2.1 Build implementation roadmap

    This step involves the following participants:

    • CIO
    • IT Director
    • IT Managers
    • Service Desk Manager
    • Representation from tier 2 and tier 3 specialists

    Outcomes

    The implementation plan will help track and categorize the next steps and finalize the project.

    DELIVERABLES

    • Implementation roadmap

    Collaborate to create an implementation plan

    4.2.1 Create the implementation plan

    Estimated Time: 45 minutes

    Determine the sequence of improvement initiatives that have been identified throughout the project.

    The purpose of this exercise is to define a timeline and commit to initiatives to reach your goals.

    Instructions:

    1. Review the initiatives that will be taken to improve the service desk and revise tasks, as necessary.
    2. Input each of the tasks in the data entry tab and provide a description and rationale behind the task.
    3. Assign an effort, priority, and cost level to each task (high, medium, low).
    4. Assign ownership to each task.
    5. Identify the timeline for each task based on the priority, effort, and cost (short, medium, and long term).
    6. Highlight risk for each task if it will be deferred.
    7. Track the progress of each task with the status column.

    Participants

    • CIO
    • IT Managers
    • Service Desk Manager
    • Service Desk Agents

    A screenshot of the Roadmap tool.

    Document using the Roadmap tool.

    Related Info-Tech Research

    Standardize the Service Desk

    ImplementHardware and Software Asset Management

    Optimize Change Management Incident and Problem Management Build a Continual Improvement Plan for the Service Desk

    The Standardize blueprint reviews service desk structures and metrics and builds essential processes and workflows for incident management, service request fulfillment, and knowledge management practices.

    Once the service desk is operational, there are three paths to basic ITSM maturity:

    • Having the incident management processes and workflows built allows you to:
      • Introduce Change Management to reduce change-related incidents.
      • Introduce Problem Management to reduce incident recurrence.
      • Introduce Asset Management to augment service management processes with reliable data.

    Solicit targeted department feedback on core IT service capabilities, IT communications, and business enablement. Use the results to assess the satisfaction of end users, with each service broken down by department and seniority level.

    Works cited

    “Help Desk Staffing Models: Simple Analysis Can Save You Money.” Giva, Inc., 2 Sept. 2009. Web.

    Marrone et al. “IT Service Management: A Cross-national Study of ITIL Adoption.” Communications of the Association for Information Systems: Vol. 34, Article 49. 2014. PDF.

    Rumburg, Jeff. “Metric of the Month: First Level Resolution Rate.” MetricNet, 2011. Web.

    “Service Recovery Paradox.” Wikipedia, n.d. Web.

    Tang, Xiaojun, and Yuki Todo. “A Study of Service Desk Setup in Implementing IT Service Management in Enterprises.” Technology and Investment: Vol. 4, pp. 190-196. 2013. PDF.

    “The Survey of Adult Skills (PIAAC).” Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2016. Web.

    Contributors

    • Jason Aqui, IT Director, Bellevue College
    • Kevin Sigil, IT Director, Southwest Care Centre
    • Lucas Gutierrez, Service Desk Manager, City of Santa Fe
    • Rama Dhuwaraha, CIO, University of North Texas System
    • Annelie Rugg, CIO, UCLA Humanities
    • Owen McKeith, Manager IT Infrastructure, Canpotex
    • Rod Gula, IT Director, American Realty Association
    • Rosalba Trujillo, Service Desk Manager, Northgate Markets
    • Jason Metcalfe, IT Manager, Mesalabs
    • Bradley Rodgers, IT Manager, SecureTek
    • Daun Costa, IT Manager, Pita Pit
    • Kari Petty, Service Desk Manager, Mansfield Oil
    • Denis Borka, Service Desk Manager, PennTex Midstream
    • Lateef Ashekun, IT Manager, City of Atlanta
    • Ted Zeisner, IT Manager, University of Ottawa Institut de Cardiologie

    Enhance Your Solution Architecture Practices

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}157|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $33,359 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 11 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Development
    • Parent Category Link: /development
    • In today’s world, business agility is essential to stay competitive. Quick responses to business needs through efficient development and deployment practices is critical for business value delivery.
    • A mature solution architecture practice is the basic necessity for a business to have technical agility.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    Don’t architect for normal situations. That is a shallow approach and leads to decisions that may seem “right” but will not be able to stand up to system elasticity needs.

    Impact and Result

    • Understand the different parts of a continuous security architecture framework and how they may apply to your decisions.
    • Develop a solution architecture for upcoming work (or if there is a desire to reduce tech debt).

    Enhance Your Solution Architecture Practices Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Solution Architecture Practices Deck – A deck to help you develop an approach for or validate existing solution architecture capability.

    Translate stakeholder objectives into architecture requirements, solutions, and changes. Incorporate architecture quality attributes in decisions to increase your architecture’s life. Evaluate your solution architecture from multiple views to obtain a holistic perspective of the range of issues, risks, and opportunities.

    • Enhance Your Solution Architecture Practices – Phases 1-3

    2. Solution Architecture Template – A template to record the results from the exercises to help you define, detail, and make real your digital product vision.

    Identify and detail the value maps that support the business, and discover the architectural quality attribute that is most important for the value maps. Brainstorm solutions for design decisions for data, security, scalability, and performance.

    • Solution Architecture Template
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Enhance Your Solution Architecture Practices

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Vision and Value Maps

    The Purpose

    Document a vision statement for the solution architecture practice (in general) and/or a specific vision statement, if using a single project as an example.

    Document business architecture and capabilities.

    Decompose capabilities into use cases.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Provide a great foundation for an actionable vision and goals that people can align to.

    Develop a collaborative understanding of business capabilities.

    Develop a collaborative understanding of use cases and personas that are relevant for the business.

    Activities

    1.1 Develop vision statement.

    1.2 Document list of value stream maps and their associated use cases.

    1.3 Document architectural quality attributes needed for use cases using SRME.

    Outputs

    Solution Architecture Template with sections filled out for vision statement canvas and value maps

    2 Continue Vision and Value Maps, Begin Phase 2

    The Purpose

    Map value stream to required architectural attributes.

    Prioritize architecture decisions.

    Discuss and document data architecture.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    An understanding of architectural attributes needed for value streams.

    Conceptual understanding of data architecture.

    Activities

    2.1 Map value stream to required architectural attributes.

    2.2 Prioritize architecture decisions.

    2.3 Discuss and document data architecture.

    Outputs

    Solution Architecture Template with sections filled out for value stream and architecture attribute mapping; a prioritized list of architecture design decisions; and data architecture

    3 Continue Phase 2, Begin Phase 3

    The Purpose

    Discuss security and threat assessment.

    Discuss resolutions to threats via security architecture decisions.

    Discuss system’s scalability needs.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Decisions for security architecture.

    Decisions for scalability architecture.

    Activities

    3.1 Discuss security and threat assessment.

    3.2 Discuss resolutions to threats via security architecture decisions.

    3.3 Discuss system’s scalability needs.

    Outputs

    Solution Architecture Template with sections filled out for security architecture and scalability design

    4 Continue Phase 3, Start and Finish Phase 4

    The Purpose

    Discuss performance architecture.

    Compile all the architectural decisions into a solutions architecture list.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A complete solution architecture.

    A set of principles that will form the foundation of solution architecture practices.

    Activities

    4.1 Discuss performance architecture.

    4.2 Compile all the architectural decisions into a solutions architecture list.

    Outputs

    Solution Architecture Template with sections filled out for performance and a complete solution architecture

    Further reading

    Enhance Your Solution Architecture Practice

    Ensure your software systems solution is architected to reflect stakeholders’ short- and long-term needs.

    Analyst Perspective

    Application architecture is a critical foundation for supporting the growth and evolution of application systems. However, the business is willing to exchange the extension of the architecture’s life with quality best practices for the quick delivery of new or enhanced application functionalities. This trade-off may generate immediate benefits to stakeholders, but it will come with high maintenance and upgrade costs in the future, rendering your system legacy early.

    Technical teams know the importance of implementing quality attributes into architecture but are unable to gain approval for the investments. Overcoming this challenge requires a focus of architectural enhancements on specific problem areas with significant business visibility. Then, demonstrate how quality solutions are vital enablers for supporting valuable application functionalities by tracing these solutions to stakeholder objectives and conducting business and technical risk and impact assessments through multiple business and technical perspectives.

    this is a picture of Andrew Kum-Seun

    Andrew Kum-Seun
    Research Manager, Applications
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Enhance Your Solution Architecture

    Ensure your software systems solution is architected to reflect stakeholders’ short- and long-term needs.

    EXECUTIVE BRIEF

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    • Most organizations have some form of solution architecture; however, it may not accurately and sufficiently support the current and rapidly changing business and technical environments.
    • To enable quick delivery, applications are built and integrated haphazardly, typically omitting architecture quality practices.

    Common Obstacles

    • Failing to involve development and stakeholder perspectives in design can lead to short-lived architecture and critical development, testing, and deployment constraints and risks being omitted.
    • Architects are experiencing little traction implementing solutions to improve architecture quality due to the challenge of tracing these solutions back to the right stakeholder objectives.

    Info-Tech's Approach

    • Translate stakeholder objectives into architecture requirements, solutions, and changes. Incorporate architecture quality attributes in decisions to increase your architecture’s life.
    • Evaluate your solution architecture from multiple views to obtain a holistic perspective of the range of issues, risks, and opportunities.
    • Regularly review and recalibrate your solution architecture so that it accurately reflects and supports current stakeholder needs and technical environments.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Well-received applications can have poor architectural qualities. Functional needs often take precedence over quality architecture. Quality must be baked into design, execution, and decision-making practices to ensure the right tradeoffs are made.

    A badly designed solution architecture is the root of all technical evils

    A well-thought-through and strategically designed solution architecture is essential for the long-term success of any software system, and by extension, the organization because:

    1. It will help achieve quality attribute requirements (security, scalability, performance, usability, resiliency, etc.) for a software system.
    2. It can define and refine architectural guiding principles. A solution architecture is not only important for today but also a vision for the future of the system’s ability to react positively to changing business needs.
    3. It can help build usable (and reusable) services. In a fast-moving environment, the convenience of having pre-made plug-and-play architectural objects reduces the risk incurred from knee-jerk reactions in response to unexpected demands.
    4. It can be used to create a roadmap to an IT future state. Architectural concerns support transition planning activities that can lead to the successful implementation of a strategic IT plan.

    Demand for quick delivery makes teams omit architectural best practices, increasing downstream risks

    In its need for speed, a business often doesn’t see the value in making sure architecture is maintainable, reusable, and scalable. This demand leads to an organizational desire for development practices and the procurement of vendors that favor time-to-market over long-term maintainability. Unfortunately, technical teams are pushed to omit design quality and validation best practices.

    What are the business impacts of omitting architecture design practices?

    Poor quality application architecture impedes business growth opportunities, exposes enterprise systems to risks, and consumes precious IT budgets in maintenance that could otherwise be used for innovation and new projects.

    Previous estimations indicate that roughly 50% of security problems are the result of software design. […] Flaws in the architecture of a software system can have a greater impact on various security concerns in the system, and as a result, give more space and flexibility for malicious users.(Source: IEEE Software)

    Errors in software requirements and software design documents are more frequent than errors in the source code itself according to Computer Finance Magazine. Defects introduced during the requirements and design phase are not only more probable but also more severe and more difficult to remove. (Source: iSixSigma)

    Design a solution architecture that can be successful within the constraints and complexities set before you

    APPLICATION ARCHITECTURE…

    … describes the dependencies, structures, constraints, standards, and development guidelines to successfully deliver functional and long-living applications. This artifact lays the foundation to discuss the enhancement of the use and operations of your systems considering existing complexities.

    Good architecture design practices can give you a number of benefits:

    Lowers maintenance costs by revealing key issues and risks early. The Systems Sciences Institute at IBM has reported that the cost to fix an error found after product release was 4 to 5 times as much as one uncovered during design.(iSixSigma)

    Supports the design and implementation activities by providing key insights for project scheduling, work allocation, cost analysis, risk management, and skills development.(IBM: developerWorks)

    Eliminates unnecessary creativity and activities on the part of designers and implementers, which is achieved by imposing the necessary constraints on what they can do and making it clear that deviation from constraints can break the architecture.(IBM: developerWorks)

    Use Info-Tech’s Continuous Solution Architecture (CSA) Framework for designing adaptable systems

    Solution architecture is not a one-size-fits-all conversation. There are many design considerations and trade-offs to keep in mind as a product or services solution is conceptualized, evaluated, tested, and confirmed. The following is a list of good practices that should inform most architecture design decisions.

    Principle 1: Design your solution to have at least two of everything.

    Principle 2: Include a “kill switch” in your fault-isolation design. You should be able to turn off everything you release.

    Principle 3: If it can be monitored, it should be. Use server and audit logs where possible.

    Principle 4: Asynchronous is better than synchronous. Asynchronous design is more complex but worth the processing efficiency it introduces.

    Principle 5: Stateless over stateful: State data should only be used if necessary.

    Principle 6: Go horizonal (scale out) over vertical (scale up).

    Principle 7: Good architecture comes in small packages.

    Principle 8: Practice just-in-time architecture. Delay finalizing an approach for as long as you can.

    Principle 9: X-ilities over features. Quality of an architecture is the foundation over which features exist. A weak foundation can never be obfuscated through shiny features.

    Principle 10: Architect for products not projects. A product is an ongoing concern, while a project is short lived and therefore only focused on what is. A product mindset forces architects to think about what can or should be.

    Principle 11: Design for rollback: When all else fails, you should be able to stand up the previous best state of the system.

    Principle 12: Test the solution architecture like you test your solution’s features.

    CSA should be used for every step in designing a solution’s architecture

    Solution architecture is a technical response to a business need, and like all complex evolutionary systems, must adapt its design for changing circumstances.

    The triggers for changes to existing solution architectures can come from, at least, three sources:

    1. Changing business goals
    2. Existing backlog of technical debt
    3. Solution architecture roadmap

    A solution’s architecture is cross-cutting and multi-dimensional and at the minimum includes:

    • Product Portfolio Strategy
    • Application Architecture
    • Data Architecture
    • Information Architecture
    • Operational Architecture

    along with several qualitative attributes (also called non-functional requirements).

    This image contains a chart which demonstrates the relationship between changing hanging business goals, Existing backlog of technical debt, Solution architecture roadmap, and Product Portfolio Strategy, Application Architecture, Data Architecture, Information Architecture and, Operational Architecture

    Related Research: Product Portfolio Strategy

    Integrate Portfolios to Create Exceptional Customer Value

    • Define an organizing principle that will structure your projects and applications in a way that matters to your stakeholders.
    • Bridge application and project portfolio data using the organizing principle that matters to communicate with stakeholders across the organization.
    • Create a dashboard that brings together the benefits of both project and application portfolio management to improve visibility and decision making.

    Deliver on Your Digital Portfolio Vision

    • Recognize that a vision is only as good as the data that backs it up. Lay out a comprehensive backlog with quality built in that can be effectively communicated and understood through roadmaps.
    • Your intent is only a dream if it cannot be implemented ; define what goes into a release plan via the release canvas.
    • Define a communication approach that lets everyone know where you are heading.

    Related Research: Data, Information & Integration Architecture

    Build a Data Architecture Roadmap

    • Have a framework in place to identify the appropriate solution for the challenge at hand. Our three-phase practical approach will help you build a custom and modernized data architecture.
    • Identify and prioritize the business drivers in which data architecture changes would create the largest overall benefit and determine the corresponding data architecture tiers that need to be addressed.
    • Discover the best-practice trends, measure your current state, and define the targets for your data architecture tactics.
    • Build a cohesive and personalized roadmap for restructuring your data architecture. Manage your decisions and resulting changes.

    Build a Data Pipeline for Reporting and Analytics

    • Understand your high-level business capabilities and interactions across them – your data repositories and flows should be just a digital reflection thereof.
    • Divide your data world in logical verticals overlaid with various speed data progression lanes, i.e. build your data pipeline – and conquer it one segment at a time.
    • Use the most appropriate database design pattern for a given phase/component in your data pipeline progression.

    Related Research:Operational Architecture

    Optimize Application Release Management

    • Acquire release management ownership. Ensure there is appropriate accountability for the speed and quality of the releases passing through the entire pipeline.
    • A release manager has oversight over the entire release process and facilitates the necessary communication between business stakeholders and various IT roles.
    • Instill holistic thinking. Release management includes all steps required to push release and change requests to production along with the hand-off to Operations and Support. Increase the transparency and visibility of the entire pipeline to ensure local optimizations do not generate bottlenecks in other areas.
    • Standardize and lay a strong release management foundation. Optimize the key areas where you are experiencing the most pain and continually improve.

    Build Your Infrastructure Roadmap

    • Increased communication. More information being shared to more people who need it.
    • Better planning. More accurate information being shared.
    • Reduced lead times. Less due diligence or discovery work required as part of project implementations.
    • Faster delivery times. Less low-value work, freeing up more time for project work.

    Related Research:Security Architecture

    Identify Opportunities to Mature the Security Architecture

    • A right-sized security architecture can be created by assessing the complexity of the IT department, the operations currently underway for security, and the perceived value of a security architecture within the organization. This will bring about a deeper understanding of the organizational infrastructure.
    • Developing a security architecture should also result in a list of opportunities (i.e. initiatives) that an organization can integrate into a roadmap. These initiatives will seek to improve security operations and strengthen the IT department’s understanding of security’s role within the organization.
    • A better understanding of the infrastructure will help to save time on determining the correct technologies required from vendors, and therefore, cut down on the amount of vendor noise.
    • Creating a defensible roadmap will assist with justifying future security spend.

    Key deliverable:

    Solution Architecture Template
    Record the results from the exercises to help you define, detail, and make real your digital product vision.

    Blueprint Deliverables

    Each step of this blueprint is accompanied by supporting deliverables to help you accomplish your goals:

    This image contains screenshots of the deliverables which will be discussed later in this blueprint

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful.

    Guided Implementation

    Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track

    Workshop

    We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place

    Consulting

    Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. we need assistance through the entirety of this project.

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks are used throughout all four options

    Workshop Overview

    Contact your account representative for more information. workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8889

    Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4
    Exercises
    1. Articulate an architectural vision
    2. Develop dynamic value stream maps
    1. Create a conceptual map between the value stream, use case, and required architectural attribute
    2. Create a prioritized list of architectural attributes
    3. Develop a data architecture that supports transactional and analytical needs
    1. Document security architecture risks and mitigations
    2. Document scalability architecture
    1. Document performance-enhancing architecture
    2. Bring it all together
    Outcomes
    1. Architecture vision
    2. Dynamic value stream maps (including user stories/personas)
    1. List of required architectural attributes
    2. Architectural attributes prioritized
    3. Data architecture design decisions
    1. Security threat and risk analysis
    2. Security design decisions
    3. Scalability design decisions
    1. Performance design decisions
    2. Finalized decisions

    Guided Implementation

    What does a typical GI on this topic look like?

    A Guided Implementation (GI) is series of calls with an Info-Tech analyst to help implement our best practices in your organization.
    This GI is between 8 to 10 calls over the course of approximately four to six months.

    Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 2
    Call #1:
    Articulate an architectural vision.
    Call #4:
    Continue discussion on value stream mapping and related use cases.
    Call #6:
    Document security design decisions.
    Call #2:
    Discuss value stream mapping and related use cases.
    Call #5:
    • Map the value streams to required architectural attribute.
    • Create a prioritized list of architectural attributes.
    Call #7:
    • Document scalability design decisions.
    • Document performance design decisions.
    Call #3:
    Continue discussion on value stream mapping and related use cases.
    Call #8:
    Bring it all together.

    Phase 1: Visions and Value Maps

    Phase 1

    1.1 Articulate an Architectural Vision
    1.2 Develop Dynamic Value Stream Maps
    1.3 Map Value Streams, Use Cases, and Required Architectural Attributes
    1.4 Create a Prioritized List of Architectural Attributes

    Phase 2

    2.1 Develop a Data Architecture That Supports Transactional and Analytical Needs
    2.2 Document Security Architecture Risks and Mitigations

    Phase 3

    3.1 Document Scalability Architecture
    3.2 Document Performance Enhancing Architecture
    3.3 Combine the Different Architecture Design Decisions Into a Unified Solution Architecture

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Determine a vision for architecture outcomes
    • Draw dynamic value stream maps
    • Derive architectural design decisions
    • Prioritize design decisions

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • Business Architect
    • Product Owner
    • Application Architect
    • Integration Architect
    • Database Architect
    • Enterprise Architect

    Enhance Your Solution Architecture Practice

    Let’s get this straight: You need an architectural vision

    If you start off by saying I want to architect a system, you’ve already lost. Remember what a vision is for!

    An architectural vision...

    … is your North Star

    Your product vision serves as the single fixed point for product development and delivery.

    … aligns stakeholders

    It gets everyone on the same page.

    … helps focus on meaningful work

    There is no pride in being a rudderless ship. It can also be very expensive.

    And eventually...

    … kick-starts your strategy

    We know where to go, we know who to bring along, and we know the steps to get there. Let’s plan this out.

    An architectural vision is multi-dimensional

    Who is the target customer (or customers)?

    What is the key benefit a customer can get from using our service or product?

    Why should they be engaged with you?

    What makes our service or product better than our competitors?

    (Adapted from Crossing the Chasm)

    Info-Tech Insight

    It doesn’t matter if you are delivering value to internal or external stakeholders, you need a product vision to ensure everyone understands the “why.”

    Use a canvas as the dashboard for your architecture

    The solution architecture canvas provides a single dashboard to quickly define and communicate the most important information about the vision. A canvas is an effective tool for aligning teams and providing an executive summary view.

    This image contains a sample canvas for you to use as the dashboard for your architecture. The sections are: Solution Name, Tracking Info, Vision, Business Goals, Metrics, Personas, and Stakeholders.

    Leverage the solution architecture canvas to state and inform your architecture vision

    This image contains the sample canvas from the previous section, with annotations explaining what to do for each of the headings.

    1.1 Craft a vision statement for your solution’s architecture

    1. Use the product canvas template provided for articulating your solution’s architecture.

    *If needed, remove or add additional data points to fit your purposes.

    There are different statement templates available to help form your product vision statements. Some include:

    • For [our target customer], who [customer’s need], the [product] is a [product category or description] that [unique benefits and selling points]. Unlike [competitors or current methods], our product [main differentiators].
    • We believe (in) a [noun: world, time, state, etc.] where [persona] can [verb: do, make, offer, etc.], for/by/with [benefit/goal].
    • To [verb: empower, unlock, enable, create, etc.] [persona] to [benefit, goal, future state].
    • Our vision is to [verb: build, design, provide] the [goal, future state] to [verb: help, enable, make it easier to...] [persona].

    (Adapted from Crossing the Chasm)

    Download the Solution Architecture Template and document your vision statement.

    Input

    • Business Goals
    • Product Portfolio Vision

    Output

    • Solution Architecture Vision

    Materials

    • Whiteboard/Flip Charts

    Participants

    • Business Architect
    • Product Owner
    • IT Leadership
    • Business Leadership

    Solution Architecture Canvas: Refine your vision statement

    This image contains a screenshot of the canvas from earlier in the blueprint, with only the annotation for Solution Name: Vision, unique value proposition, elevator pitch, or positioning statement.

    Understand your value streams before determining your solution’s architecture

    Business Strategy

    Sets and communicates the direction of the entire organization.

    Value Stream

    Segments, groups, and creates a coherent narrative as to how an organization creates value.

    Business Capability Map

    Decomposes an organization into its component parts to establish a common language across the organization.

    Execution

    Implements the business strategy through capability building or improvement projects.

    Identify your organization’s goals and define the value streams that support them

    Goal

    Revenue Growth

    Value Streams

    Stream 1- Product Purchase
    Stream 2- Customer Acquisition
    stream 3- Product Financing

    There are many techniques that help with constructing value streams and their capabilities.

    Domain-driven design is a technique that can be used for hypothesizing the value maps, their capabilities, and associated solution architecture.

    Read more about domain-driven design here.

    Value streams can be external (deliver value to customers) or internal (support operations)

      External Perspective

    1. Core value streams are mostly externally facing: they deliver value to either an external/internal customer and they tie to the customer perspective of the strategy map.
    • E.g. customer acquisition, product purchase, product delivery

    Internal Perspective

  • Support value streams are internally facing: they provide the foundational support for an organization to operate.
    • E.g. employee recruitment to retirement

    Key Questions to Ask While Evaluating Value Streams

    • Who are your customers?
    • What benefits do we deliver to them?
    • How do we deliver those benefits?
    • How does the customer receive the benefits?
    This image contains an example of value streams. The main headings are: Customer Acquisitions, Product Purchase, Product Delivery, Confirm Order, Product Financing, and Product Release.

    Value streams highlight the what, not the how

    Value chains set a high-level context, but architectural decisions still need to be made to deal with the dynamism of user interaction and their subsequent expectations. User stories (and/or use cases) and themes are great tools for developing such decisions.

    Product Delivery

    1. Order Confirmation
    2. Order Dispatching
    3. Warehouse Management
    4. Fill Order
    5. Ship Order
    6. Deliver Order

    Use Case and User Story Theme: Confirm Order

    This image shows the relationship between confirming the customer's order online, and the Online Buyer, the Online Catalog, the Integrated Payment, and the Inventory Lookup.

    The use case Confirming Customer’s Online Order has four actors:

    1. An Online Buyer who should be provided with a catalog of products to purchase from.
    2. An Online Catalog that is invoked to display its contents on demand.
    3. An Integrated Payment system for accepting an online form of payment (credit card, Bitcoins, etc.) in a secure transaction.
    4. An Inventory Lookup module that confirms there is stock available to satisfy the Online Buyer’s order.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Each use case theme links back to a feature(s) in the product backlog.

    Related Research

    Deliver on Your Digital Portfolio Vision

    • Recognize that a vision is only as good as the data that backs it up. Lay out a comprehensive backlog with quality built in that can be effectively communicated and understood through roadmaps.
    • Your intent is only a dream if it cannot be implemented – define what goes into a release plan via the release canvas.
    • Define a communication approach that lets everyone know where you are heading.

    Document Your Business Architecture

    • Recognize the opportunity for architecture work, analyze the current and target states of your business strategy, and identify and engage the right stakeholders.
    • Model the business in the form of architectural blueprints.
    • Apply business architecture techniques such as strategy maps, value streams, and business capability maps to design usable and accurate blueprints of the business.
    • Drive business architecture forward to promote real value to the organization.
    • Assess your current projects to determine if you are investing in the right capabilities. Conduct business capability assessments to identify opportunities and to prioritize projects.

    1.2 Document dynamic value stream maps

    1. Create value stream maps that support your business objectives.
    • The value stream maps could belong to existing or new business objectives.
  • For each value stream map:
    • Determine use case(s), the actors, and their expected activity.

    *Refer to the next slide for an example of a dynamic value stream map.

    Download the Solution Architecture Template for documentation of dynamic value stream map

    Input

    • Business Goals
    • Some or All Existing Business Processes
    • Some or All Proposed New Business Processes

    Output

    • Dynamic Value Stream Maps for Multiple Use Roles and Use Cases

    Materials

    • Whiteboard/Flip Charts

    Participants

    • Business Architect
    • Product Owner
    • Application Architect
    • Integration Architect

    Example: Dynamic value stream map

    Loan Provision*

    *Value Stream Name: Usually has the same name as the capability it illustrates.

    Loan Application**; Disbursement of Fund**; Risk Management**; Service Accounts**

    **Value Stream Components: Specific functions that support the successful delivery of a value stream.

    Disbursement of Funds

    This image shows the relationship between depositing the load into the applicant's bank account, and the Applicant's bank, the Loan Applicant, and the Loan Supplier.

    Style #1:

    The use case Disbursement of Funds has three actors:

    1. A Loan Applicant who applied for a loan and got approved for one.
    2. A Loan Supplier who is the source for the funds.
    3. The Applicant’s Bank that has an account into which the funds are deposited.

    Style # 2:

    Loan Provision: Disbursement of Funds
    Use Case Actors Expectation
    Deposit Loan Into Applicant’s Bank Account
    1. Loan Applicant
    2. Loan Supplier
    3. Applicant’s Bank
    1. Should be able to see deposit in bank account
    2. Deposit funds into account
    3. Accept funds into account

    Mid-Phase 1 Checkpoint

    By now, the following items are ideally completed:

    • Mid-Phase 1 Checkpoint

    Start with an investigation of your architecture’s qualitative needs

    Quality attributes can be viewed as the -ilities (e.g. scalability, usability, reliability) that a software system needs to provide. A system not meeting any of its quality attribute requirements will likely not function as required. Examples of quality attributes are:

    1. Slow system response time
    2. Security breaches that result in loss of personal data
    3. A product feature upgrade that is not compatible with previous versions
    Examples of Qualitative Attributes
    Performance Compatibility Usability Reliability Security Maintainability
    • Response Time
    • Resource Utilization
    • System Capacity
    • Interoperability
    • Accessibility
    • User Interface
    • Intuitiveness
    • Availability
    • Fault Tolerance
    • Recoverability
    • Integrity
    • Non-Repudiation
    • Modularity
    • Reusability
    • Modifiability
    • Testability

    Focus on quality attributes that are architecturally significant.

    • Not every system requires every quality attribute.
    • Pay attention to those attributes without which the solution will not be able to satisfy a user’s abstract* expectation.
    • This set can be considered Architecturally Significant Requirements (ASR). ASR concern scenarios have the most impact on the architecture of the software system.
    • ASR are fundamental needs of the system and changing them in the future can be a costly and difficult exercise.

    *Abstract since attributes like performance and reliability are not directly measurable by a user.

    Stimulus Response Measurement Environmental Context

    For applicable use cases: (*Adapted from S Carnegie Mellon University, 2000)

    1. Determine the Stimulus (temporal, external, or internal) that puts stress on the system. For example, a VPN-accessed hospital management system is used for nurses to login at 8am every weekday.
    2. Describe how the system should Respond to the stimulus. For example, the hospital management system should complete a nurse login under 10ms on initiation of the HTTPS request.
    3. Set a Measurement criteria for determining the success of the response to the stimulus. For example, the system should be able to successfully respond to 98% of the HTTPS requests the first time.
    4. Note the environmental context under which the stimulus occurs, including any unusual conditions in effect.
    • The hospital management system needs to respond in under 10ms under typical load or peak load?
    • What is the time variance of peak loads, for example, an e-commerce system during a Black Friday sale?
    • How big is the peak load?

    Info-Tech Insight

    Three out of four is bad. Don’t architect for normal situations because the solution will be fragile and prone to catastrophic failure under unexpected events.
    Read article: Retail sites crash under weight of online Black Friday shoppers.

    Discover and evaluate the qualitative attributes needed for use cases or user stories

    Deposit Loan Into Applicant’s Bank Account

    Assume analysis is being done for a to-be developed system.

    User Loan Applicant
    Expectations On login to the web system, should be able to see accurate bank balance after loan funds are deposited.
    User signs into the online portal and opens their account balance page.
    Expected Response From System System creates a connection to the data source and renders it on the screen in under 10ms.
    Measurement Under Normal Loads:
    • Response in 10ms or less
    • Data should not be stale
    Under Peak Loads:
    • Response in 15ms or less
    • Data should not be stale
    Quality Attribute Required Required Attribute # 1: Performance
    • Design Decision: Reduce latency by placing authorization components closer to user’s location.
    Required Attribute # 2: Data Reliability
    • Design Decision: Use event-driven ETL pipelines.
    Required Attribute # 3: Scalability
    • Design Decision: Following Principle # 4 of the CSA (JIT Architecture), delay decision until necessary.

    Use cases developed in Phase 1.2 should be used here. (Adapted from the ATAM Utility Tree Method for Quality Attribute Engineering)

    Reduce technical debt while you are at it

    Deposit Loan Into Applicant’s Bank Account

    Assume analysis is being done for a to-be developed system.

    UserLoan Applicant
    ExpectationsOn login to the web system, should be able to see accurate bank balance after loan funds are deposited.
    User signs into the online portal and opens their account balance page.
    Expected Response From SystemSystem creates a connection to the data source and renders it on the screen in under 10ms.
    MeasurementUnder Normal Loads:
    • Response in 10ms or less
    • Data should not be stale
    Under Peak Loads:
    • Response in 15ms or less
    • Data should not be stale
    Quality Attribute RequiredRequired Attribute # 1: Performance
    • Design Decision: Reduce latency by placing authorization components closer to user’s location.

    Required Attribute # 2: Data Reliability

    • Expected is 15ms or less under peak loads, but average latency is 21ms.
    • Design Decision: Use event-driven ETL pipelines.

    Required Attribute # 3: Scalability

    • Data should not be stale and should sync instantaneously, but in some zip codes data synchronization is taking 8 hours.
    • Design Decision: Investigate integrations and flows across application, database, and infrastructure. (Note: A dedicated section for discussing scalability is presented in Phase 2.)

    1.3 Create a conceptual map between the value streams, use cases, and required architectural attributes

    1. For selected use cases completed in Phase 1.2:
    • Map the value stream to its associated use cases.
    • For each use case, list the required architectural quality attributes.

    Download the Solution Architecture Template for mapping value stream components to their required architectural attribute.

    Input

    • Use Cases
    • User Roles
    • Stimulus to System
    • Response From System
    • Response Measurement

    Output

    • List of Architectural Quality Attributes

    Materials

    • Whiteboard/Flip Charts

    Participants

    • Business Architect
    • Application Architect
    • Integration Architect
    • Database Architect
    • Infrastructure Architect

    Example for Phase 1.3

    Loan Provision

    Loan Application → Disbursement of Funds → Risk Management → Service Accounts

    Value Stream Component Use Case Required Architectural Attribute
    Loan Application UC1: Submit Loan Application
    UC2: Review Loan Application
    UC3: Approve Loan Application
    UCn: ……..
    UC1: Resilience, Data Reliability
    UC2: Data Reliability
    UC3: Scalability, Security, Performance
    UCn: …..
    Disbursement of Funds UC1: Deposit Funds Into Applicant’s Bank Account
    UCn: ……..
    UC1: Performance, Scalability, Data Reliability
    Risk Management ….. …..
    Service Accounts ….. …..

    1.2 Document dynamic value stream maps

    1. Create value stream maps that support your business objectives.
    • The value stream maps could belong to existing or new business objectives.
  • For each value stream map:
    • Determine use case(s), the actors, and their expected activity.

    *Refer to the next slide for an example of a dynamic value stream map.

    Download the Solution Architecture Template for documentation of dynamic value stream map

    Input

    • Business Goals
    • Some or All Existing Business Processes
    • Some or All Proposed New Business Processes

    Output

    • Dynamic Value Stream Maps for Multiple Use Roles and Use Cases

    Materials

    • Whiteboard/Flip Charts

    Participants

    • Business Architect
    • Product Owner
    • Application Architect
    • Integration Architect

    Example: Dynamic value stream map

    Loan Provision*

    *Value Stream Name: Usually has the same name as the capability it illustrates.

    Loan Application**; Disbursement of Fund**; Risk Management**; Service Accounts**

    **Value Stream Components: Specific functions that support the successful delivery of a value stream.

    Disbursement of Funds

    This image shows the relationship between depositing the load into the applicant's bank account, and the Applicant's bank, the Loan Applicant, and the Loan Supplier.

    Style #1:

    The use case Disbursement of Funds has three actors:

    1. A Loan Applicant who applied for a loan and got approved for one.
    2. A Loan Supplier who is the source for the funds.
    3. The Applicant’s Bank that has an account into which the funds are deposited.

    Style # 2:

    Loan Provision: Disbursement of Funds
    Use Case Actors Expectation
    Deposit Loan Into Applicant’s Bank Account
    1. Loan Applicant
    2. Loan Supplier
    3. Applicant’s Bank
    1. Should be able to see deposit in bank account
    2. Deposit funds into account
    3. Accept funds into account

    Mid-Phase 1 Checkpoint

    By now, the following items are ideally completed:

    • Mid-Phase 1 Checkpoint

    Start with an investigation of your architecture’s qualitative needs

    Quality attributes can be viewed as the -ilities (e.g. scalability, usability, reliability) that a software system needs to provide. A system not meeting any of its quality attribute requirements will likely not function as required. Examples of quality attributes are:

    1. Slow system response time
    2. Security breaches that result in loss of personal data
    3. A product feature upgrade that is not compatible with previous versions
    Examples of Qualitative Attributes
    Performance Compatibility Usability Reliability Security Maintainability
    • Response Time
    • Resource Utilization
    • System Capacity
    • Interoperability
    • Accessibility
    • User Interface
    • Intuitiveness
    • Availability
    • Fault Tolerance
    • Recoverability
    • Integrity
    • Non-Repudiation
    • Modularity
    • Reusability
    • Modifiability
    • Testability

    Focus on quality attributes that are architecturally significant.

    • Not every system requires every quality attribute.
    • Pay attention to those attributes without which the solution will not be able to satisfy a user’s abstract* expectation.
    • This set can be considered Architecturally Significant Requirements (ASR). ASR concern scenarios have the most impact on the architecture of the software system.
    • ASR are fundamental needs of the system and changing them in the future can be a costly and difficult exercise.

    *Abstract since attributes like performance and reliability are not directly measurable by a user.

    Stimulus Response Measurement Environmental Context

    For applicable use cases: (*Adapted from S Carnegie Mellon University, 2000)

    1. Determine the Stimulus (temporal, external, or internal) that puts stress on the system. For example, a VPN-accessed hospital management system is used for nurses to login at 8am every weekday.
    2. Describe how the system should Respond to the stimulus. For example, the hospital management system should complete a nurse login under 10ms on initiation of the HTTPS request.
    3. Set a Measurement criteria for determining the success of the response to the stimulus. For example, the system should be able to successfully respond to 98% of the HTTPS requests the first time.
    4. Note the environmental context under which the stimulus occurs, including any unusual conditions in effect.
    • The hospital management system needs to respond in under 10ms under typical load or peak load?
    • What is the time variance of peak loads, for example, an e-commerce system during a Black Friday sale?
    • How big is the peak load?

    Info-Tech Insight

    Three out of four is bad. Don’t architect for normal situations because the solution will be fragile and prone to catastrophic failure under unexpected events.
    Read article: Retail sites crash under weight of online Black Friday shoppers.

    Discover and evaluate the qualitative attributes needed for use cases or user stories

    Deposit Loan Into Applicant’s Bank Account

    Assume analysis is being done for a to-be developed system.

    User Loan Applicant
    Expectations On login to the web system, should be able to see accurate bank balance after loan funds are deposited.
    User signs into the online portal and opens their account balance page.
    Expected Response From System System creates a connection to the data source and renders it on the screen in under 10ms.
    Measurement Under Normal Loads:
    • Response in 10ms or less
    • Data should not be stale
    Under Peak Loads:
    • Response in 15ms or less
    • Data should not be stale
    Quality Attribute Required Required Attribute # 1: Performance
    • Design Decision: Reduce latency by placing authorization components closer to user’s location.
    Required Attribute # 2: Data Reliability
    • Design Decision: Use event-driven ETL pipelines.
    Required Attribute # 3: Scalability
    • Design Decision: Following Principle # 4 of the CSA (JIT Architecture), delay decision until necessary.

    Use cases developed in Phase 1.2 should be used here. (Adapted from the ATAM Utility Tree Method for Quality Attribute Engineering)

    Reduce technical debt while you are at it

    Deposit Loan Into Applicant’s Bank Account

    Assume analysis is being done for a to-be developed system.

    UserLoan Applicant
    ExpectationsOn login to the web system, should be able to see accurate bank balance after loan funds are deposited.
    User signs into the online portal and opens their account balance page.
    Expected Response From SystemSystem creates a connection to the data source and renders it on the screen in under 10ms.
    MeasurementUnder Normal Loads:
    • Response in 10ms or less
    • Data should not be stale
    Under Peak Loads:
    • Response in 15ms or less
    • Data should not be stale
    Quality Attribute RequiredRequired Attribute # 1: Performance
    • Design Decision: Reduce latency by placing authorization components closer to user’s location.

    Required Attribute # 2: Data Reliability

    • Expected is 15ms or less under peak loads, but average latency is 21ms.
    • Design Decision: Use event-driven ETL pipelines.

    Required Attribute # 3: Scalability

    • Data should not be stale and should sync instantaneously, but in some zip codes data synchronization is taking 8 hours.
    • Design Decision: Investigate integrations and flows across application, database, and infrastructure. (Note: A dedicated section for discussing scalability is presented in Phase 2.)

    1.3 Create a conceptual map between the value streams, use cases, and required architectural attributes

    1. For selected use cases completed in Phase 1.2:
    • Map the value stream to its associated use cases.
    • For each use case, list the required architectural quality attributes.

    Download the Solution Architecture Template for mapping value stream components to their required architectural attribute.

    Input

    • Use Cases
    • User Roles
    • Stimulus to System
    • Response From System
    • Response Measurement

    Output

    • List of Architectural Quality Attributes

    Materials

    • Whiteboard/Flip Charts

    Participants

    • Business Architect
    • Application Architect
    • Integration Architect
    • Database Architect
    • Infrastructure Architect

    Prioritize architectural quality attributes to ensure a right-engineered solution

    Trade-offs are inherent in solution architecture. Scaling systems may impact performance and weaken security, while fault-tolerance and redundancy may improve availability but at higher than desired costs. In the end, the best solution is not always perfect, but balanced and right-engineered (versus over- or under-engineered).

    Loan Provision

    Loan Application → Disbursement of Funds → Risk Management → Service Accounts

    1. Map architecture attributes against the value stream components.
    • Use individual use cases to determine which attributes are needed for a value stream component.
    This image contains a screenshot of the table showing the importance of scalability, resiliance, performance, security, and data reliability for loan application, disbursement of funds, risk management, and service accounts.

    In our example, the prioritized list of architectural attributes are:

    • Security (4 votes for Very Important)
    • Data Reliability (2 votes for Very Important)
    • Scalability (1 vote for Very Important and 1 vote for Fairly Important) and finally
    • Resilience (1 vote for Very Important, 0 votes for Fairly Important and 1 vote for Mildly Important)
    • Performance (0 votes for Very Important, 2 votes for Fairly Important)

    1.4 Create a prioritized list of architectural attributes (from 1.3)

    1. Using the tabular structure shown on the previous slide:
    • Map each value stream component against architectural quality attributes.
    • For each mapping, indicate its importance using the green, blue, and yellow color scheme.

    Download the Solution Architecture Template and document the list of architectural attributes by priority.

    Input

    • List of Architectural Attributes From 1.3

    Output

    • Prioritized List of Architectural Attributes

    Materials

    • Whiteboard/Flip Charts

    Participants

    • Business Architect
    • Application Architect
    • Integration Architect
    • Database Architect
    • Infrastructure Architect

    End of Phase 1

    At the end of this Phase, you should have completed the following activities:

    • Documented a set of dynamic value stream maps along with selected use cases.
    • Using the SRME framework, identified quality attributes for the system under investigation.
    • Prioritized quality attributes for system use cases.

    Phase 2: Multi-Purpose Data and Security Architecture

    Phase 1

    1.1 Articulate an Architectural Vision
    1.2 Develop Dynamic Value Stream Maps
    1.3 Map Value Streams, Use Cases, and Required Architectural Attributes
    1.4 Create a Prioritized List of Architectural Attributes

    Phase 2

    2.1 Develop a Data Architecture That Supports Transactional and Analytical Needs
    2.2 Document Security Architecture Risks and Mitigations

    Phase 3

    3.1 Document Scalability Architecture
    3.2 Document Performance Enhancing Architecture
    3.3 Combine the Different Architecture Design Decisions Into a Unified Solution Architecture

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Understand the scalability, performance, resilience, and security needs of the business.

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • Business Architect
    • Product Owner
    • Application Architect
    • Integration Architect
    • Database Architect
    • Enterprise Architect

    Enhance Your Solution Architecture Practice

    Fragmented data environments need something to sew them together

    • A full 93% of enterprises have a multi-cloud strategy, with 87% having a hybrid-cloud environment in place.
    • On average, companies have data stored in 2.2 public and 2.2 private clouds as well as in various on-premises data repositories.
    This image contains a breakdown of the cloud infrastructure, including single cloud versus multi-cloud.

    Source: Flexera

    In addition, companies are faced with:

    • Access and integration challenges (Who is sending the data? Who is getting it? Can we trust them?)
    • Data format challenges as data may differ for each consumer and sender of data
    • Infrastructure challenges as data repositories/processors are spread out over public and private clouds, are on premises, or in multi-cloud and hybrid ecosystems
    • Structured vs. unstructured data

    A robust and reliable integrated data architecture is essential for any organization that aspires to be relevant and impactful in its industry.

    Data’s context and influence on a solution’s architecture cannot be overestimated

    Data used to be the new oil. Now it’s the life force of any organization that has serious aspirations of providing profit-generating products and services to customers. Architectural decisions about managing data have a significant impact on the sustainability of a software system as well as on quality attributes such as security, scalability, performance, and availability.

    Storage and Processing go hand in hand and are the mainstay of any data architecture. Due to their central position of importance, an architecture decision for storage and processing must be well thought through or they become the bottleneck in an otherwise sound system.

    Ingestion refers to a system’s ability to accept data as an input from heterogenous sources, in different formats, and at different intervals.

    Dissemination is the set of architectural design decisions that make a system’s data accessible to external consumers. Major concerns involve security for the data in motion, authorization, data format, concurrent requests for data, etc.

    Orchestration takes care of ensuring data is current and reliable, especially for systems that are decentralized and distributed.

    Data architecture requires alignment with a hybrid data management plan

    Most companies have a combination of data. They have data they own using on-premises data sources and on the cloud. Hybrid data management also includes external data, such as social network feeds, financial data, and legal information amongst many others.

    Data integration architectures have typically been put in one of two major integration patterns:

    Application to Application Integration (or “speed matters”) Analytical Data Integrations (or “send it to me when its all done”)
    • This domain is concerned with ensuring communication between processes.
    • Examples include patterns such as Service-Oriented Architecture, REST, Event Hubs and Enterprise Service Buses.
    • This domain is focused on integrating data from transactional processes towards enterprise business intelligence. It supports activities that require well-managed data to generate evidence-based insights.
    • Examples of this pattern are ELT, enterprise data warehouses, and data marts.

    Sidebar

    Difference between real-time, batch, and streaming data movements

    Real-Time

    • Reacts to data in seconds or even quicker.
    • Real-time systems are hard to implement.

    Batch

    • Batch processing deals with a large volume of data all at once and data-related jobs are typically completed simultaneously in non-stop, sequential order.
    • Batch processing is an efficient and low-cost means of data processing.
    • Execution of batch processing jobs can be controlled manually, providing further control over how the system treats its data assets.
    • Batch processing is only useful if there are no requirements for data to be fresh and current. Real-time systems are suited to processing data that requires these attributes.

    Streaming

    • Stream processing allows almost instantaneous analysis of data as it streams from one device to another.
    • Since data is analyzed quickly, storage may not be a concern (since only computed data is stored while raw data can be dispersed).
    • Streaming requires the flow of data into the system to equal the flow of data computing, otherwise issues of data storage and performance can rise.

    Modern data ingestion and dissemination frameworks keep core data assets current and accessible

    Data ingestion and dissemination frameworks are critical for keeping enterprise data current and relevant.

    Data ingestion/dissemination frameworks capture/share data from/to multiple data sources.

    Factors to consider when designing a data ingestion/dissemination architecture

    What is the mode for data movement?

    • The mode for data movement is directly influenced by the size of data being moved and the downstream requirements for data currency.
    • Data can move in real-time, as a batch, or as a stream.

    What is the ingestion/dissemination architecture deployment strategy?

    • Outside of critical security concerns, hosting on the cloud vs. on premises leads to a lower total cost of ownership (TCO) and a higher return on investment (ROI).

    How many different and disparate data sources are sending/receiving data?

    • Stability comes if there is a good idea about the data sources/recipient and their requirements.

    What are the different formats flowing through?

    • Is the data in the form of data blocks? Is it structured, semi-unstructured, or unstructured?

    What are expected performance SLAs as data flow rate changes?

    • Data change rate is defined as the size of changes occurring every hour. It helps in selecting the appropriate tool for data movement.
    • Performance is a derivative of latency and throughput, and therefore, data on a cloud is going to have higher latency and lower throughput then if it is kept on premises.
    • What is the transfer data size? Are there any file compression and/or file splits applied on the data? What is the average and maximum size of a block object per ingestion/dissemination operation?

    What are the security requirements for the data being stored?

    • The ingestion/dissemination framework should be able to work through a secure tunnel to collect/share data if needed.

    Sensible storage and processing strategy can improve performance and scalability and be cost-effective

    The range of options for data storage is staggering...

    … but that’s a good thing because the range of data formats that organizations must deal with is also richer than in the past.

    Different strokes for different workloads.

    The data processing tool to use may depend upon the workloads the system has to manage.

    Expanding upon the Risk Management use case (as part of the Loan Provision Capability), one of the outputs for risk assessment is a report that conducts a statistical analysis of customer profiles and separates those that are possibly risky. The data for this report is spread out across different data systems and will need to be collected in a master data management storage location. The business and data architecture team have discussed three critical system needs, noted below:

    Data Management Requirements for Risk Management Reporting Data Design Decision
    Needs to query millions of relational records quickly
    • Strong indexing
    • Strong caching
    • Message queue
    Needs a storage space for later retrieval of relational data
    • Data storage that scales as needed
    Needs turnkey geo-replication mechanism with document retrieval in milliseconds
    • Add NoSQL with geo-replication and quick document access

    Keep every core data source on the same page through orchestration

    Data orchestration, at its simplest, is the combination of data integration, data processing, and data concurrency management.

    Data pipeline orchestration is a cross-cutting process that manages the dependencies between your data integration tasks and scheduled data jobs.

    A task or application may periodically fail, and therefore, as a part of our data architecture strategy, there must be provisions for scheduling, rescheduling, replaying, monitoring, retrying, and debugging the entire data pipeline in a holistic way.

    Some of the functionality provided by orchestration frameworks are:

    • Job scheduling
    • Job parametrization
    • SLAs tracking, alerting, and notification
    • Dependency management
    • Error management and retries
    • History and audit
    • Data storage for metadata
    • Log aggregation
    Data Orchestration Has Three Stages
    Organize Transform Publicize
    Organizations may have legacy data that needs to be combined with new data. It’s important for the orchestration tool to understand the data it deals with. Transform the data from different sources into one standard type. Make transformed data easily accessible to stakeholders.

    2.1 Discuss and document data architecture decisions

    1. Using the value maps and associated use cases from Phase 1, determine the data system quality attributes.
    2. Use the sample tabular layout on the next slide or develop one of your own.

    Download the Solution Architecture Template for documenting data architecture decisions.

    Input

    • Value Maps and Use Cases

    Output

    • Initial Set of Data Design Decisions

    Materials

    • Whiteboard/Flip Charts

    Participants

    • Business Architect
    • Application Architect
    • Integration Architect
    • Database Architect
    • Infrastructure Architect

    Example: Data Architecture

    Data Management Requirements for Risk Management Reporting Data Design Decision
    Needs to query millions of relational records quickly
    • Strong indexing
    • Strong caching
    • Message queue
    Needs a storage space for later retrieval of relational data
    • Data storage that scales as needed
    Needs turnkey geo-replication mechanism with document retrieval in milliseconds
    • Add NoSQL with geo-replication and quick document access

    There is no free lunch when making the most sensible security architecture decision; tradeoffs are a necessity

    Ensuring that any real system is secure is a complex process involving tradeoffs against other important quality attributes (such as performance and usability). When architecting a system, we must understand:

    • Its security needs.
    • Its security threat landscape.
    • Known mitigations for those threats to ensure that we create a system with sound security fundamentals.

    The first thing to do when determining security architecture is to conduct a threat and risk assessment (TRA).

    This image contains a sample threat and risk assessment. The steps are Understand: Until we thoroughly understand what we are building, we cannot secure it. Structure what you are building, including: System boundary, System structure, Databases, Deployment platform; Analyze: Use techniques like STRIDE and attack trees to analyze what can go wrong and what security problems this will cause; Mitigate: The security technologies to use, to mitigate your concerns, are discussed here. Decisions about using single sign-on (SSO) or role-based access control (RBAC), encryption, digital signatures, or JWT tokens are made. An important part of this step is to consider tradeoffs when implementing security mechanisms; validate: Validation can be done by experimenting with proposed mitigations, peer discussion, or expert interviews.

    Related Research

    Optimize Security Mitigation Effectiveness Using STRIDE

    • Have a clear picture of:
      • Critical data and data flows
      • Organizational threat exposure
      • Security countermeasure deployment and coverage
    • Understand which threats are appropriately mitigated and which are not.
    • Generate a list of initiatives to close security gaps.
    • Create a quantified risk and security model to reassess program and track improvement.
    • Develop measurable information to present to stakeholders.

    The 3A’s of strong security: authentication, authorization, and auditing

    Authentication

    Authentication mechanisms help systems verify that a user is who they claim to be.

    Examples of authentication mechanisms are:

    • Two-Factor Authentication
    • Single Sign-On
    • Multi-Factor Authentication
    • JWT Over OAUTH

    Authorization

    Authorization helps systems limit access to allowed features, once a user has been authenticated.

    Examples of authentication mechanisms are:

    • RBAC
    • Certificate Based
    • Token Based

    Auditing

    Securely recording security events through auditing proves that our security mechanisms are working as intended.

    Auditing is a function where security teams must collaborate with software engineers early and often to ensure the right kind of audit logs are being captured and recorded.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Defects in your application software can compromise privacy and integrity even if cryptographic controls are in place. A security architecture made after thorough TRA does not override security risk introduced due to irresponsible software design.

    Examples of threat and risk assessments using STRIDE and attack trees

    STRIDE is a threat modeling framework and is composed of:

    • Spoofing or impersonation of someone other than oneself
    • Tampering with data and destroying its integrity
    • Repudiation by bypassing system identity controls
    • Information disclosure to unauthorized persons
    • Denial of service that prevents system or parts of it from being used
    • Elevation of privilege so that attackers get rights they should not have
    Example of using STRIDE for a TRA on a solution using a payment system This image contains a sample attack tree.
    Spoofing PayPal Bad actor can send fraudulent payment request for obtaining funds.
    Tampering PayPal Bad actor accesses data base and can resend fraudulent payment request for obtaining funds.
    Repudiation PayPal Customer claims, incorrectly, their account made a payment they did not authorize.
    Disclosure PayPal Private service database has details leaked and made public.
    Denial of Service PayPal Service is made to slow down through creating a load on the network, causing massive build up of requests
    Elevation of Privilege PayPal Bad actor attempts to enter someone else’s account by entering incorrect password a number of times.

    2.2 Document security architecture risks and mitigations

    1. Using STRIDE, attack tree, or any other framework of choice:
    • Conduct a TRA for use cases identified in Phase 1.2
  • For each threat identified through the TRA, think through the implications of using authentication, authorization, and auditing as a security mechanism.
  • Download the Solution Architecture Template for documenting data architecture decisions.

    Input

    • Dynamic Value Stream Maps

    Output

    • Security Architecture Risks and Mitigations

    Materials

    • Whiteboard/Flip Charts

    Participants

    • Business Architect
    • Product Owner
    • Security Team
    • Application Architect
    • Integration Architect

    Examples of threat and risk assessments using STRIDE

    Example of using STRIDE for a TRA on a solution using a payment system
    Threat System Component Description Quality Attribute Impacted Resolution
    Spoofing PayPal Bad actor can send fraudulent payment request for obtaining funds. Confidentiality Authorization
    Tampering PayPal Bad actor accesses data base and can resend fraudulent payment request for obtaining funds. Integrity Authorization
    Repudiation PayPal Customer claims, incorrectly, their account made a payment they did not authorize. Integrity Authentication and Logging
    Disclosure PayPal Private service database has details leaked and made public. Confidentiality Authorization
    Denial of Service PayPal Service is made to slow down through creating a load on the network, causing massive build up of requests Availability N/A
    Elevation of Privilege PayPal Bad actor attempts to enter someone else’s account by entering incorrect password a number of times. Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability Authorization

    Phase 3: Upgrade Your System’s Availability

    Phase 1

    1.1 Articulate an Architectural Vision
    1.2 Develop Dynamic Value Stream Maps
    1.3 Map Value Streams, Use Cases, and Required Architectural Attributes
    1.4 Create a Prioritized List of Architectural Attributes

    Phase 2

    2.1 Develop a Data Architecture That Supports Transactional and Analytical Needs
    2.2 Document Security Architecture Risks and Mitigations

    Phase 3

    3.1 Document Scalability Architecture
    3.2 Document Performance Enhancing Architecture
    3.3 Combine the Different Architecture Design Decisions Into a Unified Solution Architecture

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Examine architecture for scalable and performant system designs
    • Integrate all design decisions made so far into a solution design decision log

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • Business Architect
    • Product Owner
    • Application Architect
    • Integration Architect
    • Database Architect
    • Enterprise Architect

    Enhance Your Solution Architecture Practice

    In a cloud-inspired system architecture, scalability takes center stage as an architectural concern

    Scale and scope of workloads are more important now than they were, perhaps, a decade and half back. Architects realize that scalability is not an afterthought. Not dealing with it at the outset can have serious consequences should an application workload suddenly exceed expectations.

    Scalability is …

    … the ability of a system to handle varying workloads by either increasing or decreasing the computing resources of the system.

    An increased workload could include:

    • Higher transaction volumes
    • A greater number of users

    Architecting for scalability is …

    … not easy since organizations may not be able to accurately judge, outside of known circumstances, when and why workloads may unexpectedly increase.

    A scalable architecture should be planned at the:

    • Application Level
    • Infrastructure Level
    • Database Level

    The right amount and kind of scalability is …

    … balancing the demands of the system with the supply of attributes.

    If demand from system > supply from system:

    • Services and products are not useable and deny value to customers.

    If supply from system > demand from system:

    • Excess resources have been paid for that are not being used.

    When discussing the scalability needs of a system, investigate the following, at a minimum:

    • In case workloads increase due to higher transaction volumes, will the system be able to cope with the additional stress?
    • In situations where workloads increase, will the system be able to support the additional stress without any major modifications being made to the system?
    • Is the cost associated with handling the increased workloads reasonable for the benefit it provides to the business?
    • Assuming the system doesn’t scale, is there any mechanism for graceful degradation?

    Use evidence-based decision making to ensure a cost-effective yet appropriate scaling strategy

    The best input for an effective scaling strategy is previously gathered traffic data mapped to specific circumstances.

    In some cases, either due to lack of monitoring or the business not being sure of its needs, scalability requirements are hard to determine. In such cases, use stated tactical business objectives to design for scalability. For example, the business might state its desire to achieve a target revenue goal. To accommodate this, a certain number of transactions would need to be conducted, assuming a particular conversion rate.

    Scaling strategies can be based on Vertical or Horizontal expansion of resources.
    Pros Cons
    Vertical
    Scale up through use of more powerful but limited number of resources
    • May not require frequent upgrades.
    • Since data is managed through a limited number of resources, it is easier to share and keep current.
    • Costly upfront.
    • Application, database, and infrastructure may not be able to make optimal use of extra processing power.
    • As the new, more powerful resource is provisioned, systems may experience downtime.
    • Lacks redundancy due to limited points of failure.
    • Performance is constrained by the upper limits of the infrastructure involved.
    Horizontal
    Scale out through use of similarly powered but larger quantity of resources
    • Cost-effective upfront.
    • System downtime is minimal, when scaling is being performed.
    • More redundance and fault-tolerance is possible since there are many nodes involved, and therefore, can replace failed nodes.
    • Performance can scale out as more nodes are added.
    • Upgrades may occur more often than in vertical scaling.
    • Increases machine footprints and administrative costs over time.
    • Data may be partitioned on multiple nodes, leading to administrative and data currency challenges.

    Info-Tech Insight

    • Scalability is the one attribute that sparks a lot of trade-off discussions. Scalable solutions may have to compromise on performance, cost, and data reliability.
    • Horizontal scalability is mostly always preferable over vertical scalability.

    Sidebar

    The many flavors of horizontal scaling

    Traffic Shard-ing

    Through this mechanism, incoming traffic is partitioned around a characteristic of the workload flowing in. Examples of partitioning characteristics are user groups, geo-location, and transaction type.

    Beware of:

    • Lack of data currency across shards.

    Copy and Paste

    As the name suggests, clone the compute resources along with the underlying databases. The systems will use a load balancer as the first point of contact between itself and the workload flowing in.

    Beware of:

    • Though this is a highly scalable model, it does introduce risks related to data currency across all databases.
    • In case master database writes are frequent, it could become a bottleneck for the entire system.

    Productization Through Containers

    This involves breaking up the system into specific functions and services and bundling their business rules/databases into deployable containers.

    Beware of:

    • Too many containers introduce the need to orchestrate the distributed architecture that results from a service-oriented approach.

    Start a scalability overview with a look at the database(s)

    To know where to go, you must know where you are. Before introducing architectural changes to database designs, use the right metrics to get an insight into the root cause of the problem(s).

    In a nutshell, the purpose of scaling solutions is to have the technology stack do less work for the most requested services/features or be able to effectively distribute the additional workload across multiple resources.

    For databases, to ensure this happens, consider these techniques:

    • Reuse data through caching on the server and/or the client. This eliminates the need for looking up already accessed data. Examples of caching are:
      • In-memory caching of data
      • Caching database queries
    • Implement good data retrieval techniques like indexes.
    • Divide labor at the database level.
      • Through setting up primary-secondary distribution of data. In such a setup, the primary node is involved in writing data to itself and passes on requests to secondary nodes for fulfillment.
      • Through setting up database shards (either horizontally or vertically).
        • In a horizontal shard, a data table is broken into smaller pieces with the same data model but unique data in it. The sum total of the shared databases contains all the data in the primary data table.
        • In a vertical shard, a data table is broken into smaller pieces, but each piece may have a subset of the data columns. The data’s corresponding columns are put into the table where the column resides.

    Info-Tech Insight

    A non-scalable architecture has more than just technology-related ramifications. Hoping that load balancers or cloud services will manage scalability-related issues is bound to have economic impacts as well.

    Sidebar

    Caching Options

    CSA PRINCIPLE 5 applies to any decision that supports system scalability.
    “X-ilities Over Features”

    Database Caching
    Fetches and stores result of database queries in memory. Subsequent requests to the database for the same queries will investigate the cache before making a connection with the database.
    Tools like Memcached or Redis are used for database caching.

    Precompute Database Caching
    Unlike database caching, this style of caching precomputes results of queries that are popular and frequently used. For example, a database trigger could execute several predetermined queries and have them ready for consumption. The precomputed results may be stored in a database cache.

    Application Object Caching
    Stores computed results in a cache for later retrieval. For data sources, which are not changing frequently and are part of a computation output, application caching will remove the need to connect with a database.

    Proxy Caching
    Caches retrieved web pages on a proxy server and makes them available for the next time the page is requested.

    The intra- and inter-process communication of the systems middle tier can become a bottleneck

    To synchronize or not to synchronize?

    A synchronous request (doing one thing at a time) means that code execution will wait for the request to be responded to before continuing.

    • A synchronous request is a blocking event and until it is completed, all following requests will have to wait for getting their responses.
    • An increasing workload on a synchronous system may impact performance.
    • Synchronous interactions are less costly in terms of design, implementation, and maintenance.
    • Scaling options include:
    1. Vertical scale up
    2. Horizontal scale out of application servers behind a load balancer and a caching technique (to minimize data retrieval roundtrips)
    3. Horizonal scale out of database servers with data partitioning and/or data caching technique

    Use synchronous requests when…

    • Each request to a system sets the necessary precondition for a following request.
    • Data reliability is important, especially in real-time systems.
    • System flows are simple.
    • Tasks that are typically time consuming, such as I/O, data access, pre-loading of assets, are completed quickly.

    Asynchronous requests (doing many things at the same time) do not block the system they are targeting.

    • It is a “fire and forget” mechanism.
    • Execution on a server/processor is triggered by the request, however, additional technical components (callbacks) for checking the state of the execution must be designed and implemented.
    • Asynchronous interactions require additional time to be spent on implementation and testing.
    • With asynchronous interactions, there is no guarantee the request initiated any processing until the callbacks check the status of the executed thread.

    Use asynchronous requests when…

    • Tasks are independent in nature and don’t require inter-task communication.
    • Systems flows need to be efficient.
    • The system is using event-driven techniques for processing.
    • Many I/O tasks are involved.
    • The tasks are long running.

    Sidebar

    Other architectural tactics for inter-process communication

    STATELESS SERVICES VERSUS STATEFUL SERVICES
    • Does not require any additional data, apart from the bits sent through with the request.
    • Without implementing a caching solution, it is impossible to access the previous data trail for a transaction session.
    • In addition to the data sent through with the request, require previous data sent to complete processing.
    • Requires server memory to store the additional state data. With increasing workloads, this could start impacting the server’s performance.
    It is generally accepted that stateless services are better for system scalability, especially if vertical scaling is costly and there is expectation that workloads will increase.
    MICROSERVICES VERSUS SERVERLESS FUNCTIONS
    • Services are designed as small units of code with a single responsibility and are available on demand.
    • A microservices architecture is easily scaled horizontally by adding a load balancer and a caching mechanism.
    • Like microservices, these are small pieces of code designed to fulfill a single purpose.
    • Are provided only through cloud vendors, and therefore, there is no need to worry about provisioning of infrastructure as needs increase.
    • Stateless by design but the life cycle of a serverless function is vendor controlled.
    Serverless function is an evolving technology and tightly controlled by the vendor. As and when vendors make changes to their serverless products, your own systems may need to be modified to make the best use of these upgrades.

    A team that does not measure their system’s scalability is a team bound to get a 5xx HTTP response code

    A critical aspect of any system is its ability to monitor and report on its operational outcomes.

    • Using the principle of continuous testing, every time an architectural change is introduced, a thorough load and stress testing cycle should be executed.
    • Effective logging and use of insightful metrics helps system design teams make data-driven decisions.
    • Using principle of site reliability engineering and predictive analytics, teams can be prepared for any unplanned exaggerated stimulus on the system and proactively set up remedial steps.

    Any system, however well architected, will break one day. Strategically place kill-switches to counter any failures and thoroughly test their functioning before releasing to production.

    • Using Principles 2 and 9 of the CSA, (include kill-switches and architect for x-ilities over features), introduce tactics at the code and higher levels that can be used to put a system in its previous best state in case of failure.
    • Examples of such tactics are:
      • Feature flags for turning on/off code modules that impact x-ilities.
      • Implement design patterns like throttling, autoscaling, and circuit breaking.
      • Writing extensive log messages that bubble up as exceptions/error handling from the code base. *Logging can be a performance drag. Use with caution as even logging code is still code that needs CPU and data storage.

    Performance is a system’s ability to satisfy time-bound expectations

    Performance can also be defined as the ability for a system to achieve its timing requirements, using available resources, under expected full-peak load:

    (International Organization for Standardization, 2011)

    • Performance and scalability are two peas in a pod. They are related to each other but are distinct attributes. Where scalability refers to the ability of a system to initiate multiple simultaneous processes, performance is the system’s ability to complete the processes within a mandated average time period.
    • Degrading performance is one of the first red flags about a system’s ability to scale up to workload demands.
    • Mitigation tactics for performance are very similar to the tactics for scalability.

    System performance needs to be monitored and measured consistently.

    Measurement Category 1: System performance in terms of end-user experience during different load scenarios.

    • Response time/latency: Length of time it takes for an interaction with the system to complete.
    • Turnaround time: Time taken to complete a batch of tasks.
    • Throughput: Amount of workload a system is capable of handling in a unit time period.

    Measurement Category 2: System performance in terms of load managed by computational resources.

    • Resource utilization: The average usage of a resource (like CPU) over a period. Peaks and troughs indicate excess vs. normal load times.
    • Number of concurrent connections: Simultaneous user requests that a resource like a server can successfully deal with at once.
    • Queue time: The turnaround time for a specific interaction or category of interactions to complete.

    Architectural tactics for performance management are the same as those used for system scalability

    Application Layer

    • Using a balanced approach that combines CSA Principle 7 (Good architecture comes in small packages) and Principle 10 (Architect for products, not projects), a microservices architecture based on domain-driven design helps process performance. Microservices use lightweight HTTP protocols and have loose coupling, adding a degree of resilience to the system as well. *An overly-engineered microservices architecture can become an orchestration challenge.
    • The code design must follow standards that support performance. Example of standards is SOLID*.
    • Serverless architectures can run application code from anywhere – for example, from edge servers close to an end user – thereby reducing latency.

    Database Layer

    • Using the right database technologies for persistence. Relational databases have implicit performance bottlenecks (which get exaggerated as data size grows along with indexes), and document store database technologies (key-value or wide-column) can improve performance in high-read environments.
    • Data sources, especially those that are frequently accessed, should ideally be located close to the application servers. Hybrid infrastructures (cloud and on premises mixed) can lead to latency when a cloud-application is accessing on-premises data.
    • Using a data partitioning strategy, especially in a domain-driven design architecture, can improve the performance of a system.

    Performance modeling and continuous testing makes the SRE a happy engineer

    Performance modeling and testing helps architecture teams predict performance risks as the solution is being developed.
    (CSA Principle 12: Test the solution architecture like you test your solution’s features)

    Create a model for your system’s hypothetical performance testing by breaking an end-to-end process or use case into its components. *Use the SIPOC framework for decomposition.

    This image contains an example of modeled performance, showing the latency in the data flowing from different data sources to the processing of the data.

    In the hypothetical example of modeled performance above:

    • The longest period of latency is 15ms.
    • The processing of data takes 30ms, while the baseline was established at 25ms.
    • Average latency in sending back user responses is 21ms – 13ms slower than expected.

    The model helps architects:

    • Get evidence for their assumptions
    • Quantitatively isolate bottlenecks at a granular level

    Model the performance flow once but test it periodically

    Performance testing measures the performance of a software system under normal and abnormal loads.

    Performance testing process should be fully integrated with software development activities and as automated as possible. In a fast-moving Agile environment, teams should attempt to:

    • Shift-left performance testing activities.
    • Use performance testing to pinpoint performance bottlenecks.
    • Take corrective action, as quickly as possible.

    Performance testing techniques

    • Normal load testing: Verifies the system’s behavior under the expected normal load to ensure that its performance requirements are met. Load testing can be used to measure response time, responsiveness, turnaround time, and throughput.
    • Expected maximum load testing: Like the normal load testing process, ensures system meets its performance requirements under expected maximum load.
    • Stress testing: Evaluates system behavior when processing loads beyond the expected maximum.

    *In a real production scenario, a combination of these tests are executed on a regular basis to monitor the performance of the system over a given period.

    3.1-3.2 Discuss and document initial decisions made for architecture scalability and performance

    1. Use the outcomes from either or both Phases 1.3 and 1.4.
    • For each value stream component, list the architecture decisions taken to ensure scalability and performance at client-facing and/or business-rule layers.

    Download the Solution Architecture Template for documenting data architecture decisions.

    Input

    • Output From Phase 1.3 and/or From Phase 1.4

    Output

    • Initial Set of Design Decisions Made for System Scalability and Performance

    Materials

    • Whiteboard/Flip Charts

    Participants

    • Business Architect
    • Application Architect
    • Integration Architect
    • Database Architect
    • Infrastructure Architect

    Example: Architecture decisions for scalability and performance

    Value Stream Component Design Decision for User Interface Layer Design Decisions for Middle Processing Layer
    Loan Application Scalability: N/A
    Resilience: Include circuit breaker design in both mobile app and responsive websites.
    Performance: Cache data client.
    Scalability: Scale vertically (up) since loan application processing is very compute intensive.
    Resilience: Set up fail-over replica.
    Performance: Keep servers in the same geo-area.
    Disbursement of Funds *Does not have a user interface Scalability: Scale horizontal when traffic reaches X requests/second.
    Resilience: Create microservices using domain-driven design; include circuit breakers.
    Performance: Set up application cache; synchronous communication since order of data input is important.
    …. …. ….

    3.3 Combine the different architecture design decisions into a unified solution architecture

    Download the Solution Architecture Template for documenting data architecture decisions.

    Input

    • Output From Phase 1.3 and/or From Phase 1.4
    • Output From Phase 2.1
    • Output From Phase 2.2
    • Output From 3.1 and 3.2

    Output

    • List of Design Decisions for the Solution

    Materials

    • Whiteboard/Flip Charts

    Participants

    • Business Architect
    • Application Architect
    • Integration Architect
    • Database Architect
    • Infrastructure Architect

    Putting it all together is the bow that finally ties this gift

    This blueprint covered the domains tagged with the yellow star.

    This image contains a screenshot of the solution architecture framework found earlier in this blueprint, with stars next to Data Architecture, Security, Performance, and Stability.

    TRADEOFF ALERT

    The right design decision is never the same for all perspectives. Along with varying opinions, comes the “at odds with each other set” of needs (scalability vs. performance, or access vs. security).

    An evidence-based decision-making approach using a domain-driven design strategy is a good mix of techniques for creating the best (right?) solution architecture.

    This image contains a screenshot of a table that summarizes the themes discussed in this blueprint.

    Summary of accomplishment

    • Gained understanding and clarification of the stakeholder objectives placed on your application architecture.
    • Completed detailed use cases and persona-driven scenario analysis and their architectural needs through SRME.
    • Created a set of design decisions for data, security, scalability, and performance.
    • Merged the different architecture domains dealt with in this blueprint to create a holistic view.

    Bibliography

    Ambysoft Inc. “UML 2 Sequence Diagrams: An Agile Introduction.” Agile Modeling, n.d. Web.

    Bass, Len, Paul Clements, and Rick Kazman. Software Architecture in Practices: Third Edition. Pearson Education, Inc. 2003.

    Eeles, Peter. “The benefits of software architecting.” IBM: developerWorks, 15 May 2006. Web.

    Flexera 2020 State of the Cloud Report. Flexera, 2020. Web. 19 October 2021.

    Furdik, Karol, Gabriel Lukac, Tomas Sabol, and Peter Kostelnik. “The Network Architecture Designed for an Adaptable IoT-based Smart Office Solution.” International Journal of Computer Networks and Communications Security, November 2013. Web.

    Ganzinger, Matthias, and Petra Knaup. “Requirements for data integration platforms in biomedical research networks: a reference model.” PeerJ, 5 February 2015. (https://peerj.com/articles/755/).

    Garlan, David, and Mary Shaw. An Introduction to Software Architecture. CMU-CS-94-166, School of Computer Science Carnegie Mellon University, January 1994.

    Gupta, Arun. “Microservice Design Patterns.” Java Code Geeks, 14 April 2015. Web.

    How, Matt. The Modern Data Warehouse in Azure. O’Reilly, 2020.

    ISO/IEC 17788:2014: Information technology – Cloud computing, International Organization for Standardization, October 2014. Web.

    ISO/IEC 18384-1:2016: Information technology – Reference Architecture for Service Oriented Architecture (SOA RA), International Organization for Standardization, June 2016. Web.

    ISO/IEC 25010:2011(en) Systems and software engineering — Systems and software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) — System and software quality models. International Organization for Standardization, March 2011. Web.

    Kazman, R., M. Klein, and P. Clements. ATAM: Method for Architecture Evaluation. S Carnegie Mellon University, August 2000. Web.

    Microsoft Developer Network. “Chapter 16: Quality Attributes.” Microsoft Application Architecture Guide. 2nd Ed., 13 January 2010. Web.

    Microsoft Developer Network. “Chapter 2: Key Principles of Software Architecture.” Microsoft Application Architecture Guide. 2nd Ed., 13 January 2010. Web.

    Microsoft Developer Network. “Chapter 3: Architectural Patterns and Styles.” Microsoft Application Architecture Guide. 2nd Ed., 14 January 2010. Web.

    Microsoft Developer Network. “Chapter 5: Layered Application Guidelines.” Microsoft Application Architecture Guide. 2nd Ed., 13 January 2010. Web.

    Mirakhorli, Mehdi. “Common Architecture Weakness Enumeration (CAWE).” IEEE Software, 2016. Web.

    Moore, G. A. Crossing the Chasm, 3rd Edition: Marketing and Selling Disruptive Products to Mainstream Customers (Collins Business Essentials) (3rd ed.). Harper Business, 2014.

    OASIS. “Oasis SOA Reference Model (SOA RM) TC.” OASIS Open, n.d. Web.

    Soni, Mukesh. “Defect Prevention: Reducing Costs and Enhancing Quality.” iSixSigma, n.d. Web.

    The Open Group. TOGAF 8.1.1 Online, Part IV: Resource Base, Developing Architecture Views. TOGAF, 2006. Web.

    The Open Group. Welcome to the TOGAF® Standard, Version 9.2, a standard of The Open Group. TOGAF, 2018. Web.

    Watts, S. “The importance of solid design principles.” BMC Blogs, 15 June 2020. 19 October 2021.

    Young, Charles. “Hexagonal Architecture–The Great Reconciler?” Geeks with Blogs, 20 Dec 2014. Web.

    APPENDIX A

    Techniques to enhance application architecture.

    Consider the numerous solutions to address architecture issues or how they will impact your application architecture

    Many solutions exist for improving the layers of the application stack that may address architecture issues or impact your current architecture. Solutions range from capability changes to full stack replacement.

    Method Description Potential Benefits Risks Related Blueprints
    Business Capabilities:
    Enablement and enhancement
    • Introduce new business capabilities by leveraging unused application functionalities or consolidate redundant business capabilities.
    • Increase value delivery to stakeholders.
    • Lower IT costs through elimination of applications.
    • Increased use of an application could overload current infrastructure.
    • IT cannot authorize business capability changes.
    Use Info-Tech’s Document Your Business Architecture blueprint to gain better understanding of business and IT alignment.
    Removal
    • Remove existing business capabilities that don’t contribute value to the business.
    • Lower operational costs through elimination of unused and irrelevant capabilities.
    • Business capabilities may be seen as relevant or critical by different stakeholder groups.
    • IT cannot authorize business capability changes.
    Use Info-Tech’s Build an Application Rationalization Framework to rationalize your application portfolio.
    Business Process:
    Process integration and consolidation
    • Combine multiple business processes into a single process.
    • Improved utilization of applications in each step of the process.
    • Reduce business costs through efficient business processes.
    • Minimize number of applications required to execute a single process.
    • Significant business disruption if an application goes down and is the primary support for business processes.
    • Organizational pushback if process integration involves multiple business groups.
    Business Process (continued):
    Process automation
    • Automate manual business processing tasks.
    • Reduce manual processing errors.
    • Improve speed of delivery.
    • Significant costs to implement automation.
    • Automation payoffs are not immediate.
    Lean business processes
    • Eliminate redundant steps.
    • Streamline existing processes by focusing on value-driven steps.
    • Improve efficiency of business process through removal of wasteful steps.
    • Increase value delivered at the end of the process.
    • Stakeholder pushback from consistently changing processes.
    • Investment from business is required to fit documentation to the process.
    Outsource the process
    • Outsource a portion of or the entire business process to a third party.
    • Leverage unavailable resources and skills to execute the business process.
    • Loss of control over process.
    • Can be costly to bring the process back into the business if desired in the future.
    Business Process (continued):
    Standardization
    • Implement standards for business processes to improve uniformity and reusability.
    • Consistently apply the same process across multiple business units.
    • Transparency of what is expected from the process.
    • Improve predictability of process execution.
    • Process bottlenecks may occur if a single group is required to sign off on deliverables.
    • Lack of enforcement and maintenance of standards can lead to chaos if left unchecked.
    User Interface:
    Improve user experience (UX)
    • Eliminate end-user emotional, mechanical, and functional friction by improving the experience of using the application.
    • UX encompasses both the interface and the user’s behavior.
    • Increase satisfaction and adoption rate from end users.
    • Increase brand awareness and user retention.
    • UX optimizations are only focused on a few user personas.
    • Current development processes do not accommodate UX assessments
    Code:
    Update coding language
    Translate legacy code into modern coding language.
    • Coding errors in modern languages can have lesser impact on the business processes they support.
    • Modern languages tend to have larger pools of coders to hire.
    • Increase availability of tools to support modern languages.
    • Coding language changes can create incompatibilities with existing infrastructure.
    • Existing coding translation tools do not offer 100% guarantee of legacy function retention.
    Code (continued):
    Open source code
    • Download pre-built code freely available in open source communities.
    • Code is rapidly evolving in the community to meet current business needs.
    • Avoid vendor lock-in from proprietary software
    • Community rules may require divulgence of work done with open source code.
    • Support is primarily provided through community, which may not address specific concerns.
    Update the development toolchain
    • Acquire new or optimize development tools with increased testing, build, and deployment capabilities.
    • Increase developer productivity.
    • Increase speed of delivery and test coverage with automation.
    • Drastic IT overhauls required to implement new tools such as code conversion, data migration, and development process revisions.
    Update source code management
    • Optimize source code management to improve coding governance, versioning, and development collaboration.
    • Ability to easily roll back to previous build versions and promote code to other environments.
    • Enable multi-user development capabilities.
    • Improve conflict management.
    • Some source code management tools cannot support legacy code.
    • Source code management tools may be incompatible with existing development toolchain.
    Data:
    Outsource extraction
    • Outsource your data analysis and extraction to a third party.
    • Lower costs to extract and mine data.
    • Leverage unavailable resources and skills to translate mined data to a usable form.
    • Data security risks associated with off-location storage.
    • Data access and control risks associated with a third party.
    Update data structure
    • Update your data elements, types (e.g. transactional, big data), and formats (e.g. table columns).
    • Standardize on a common data definition throughout the entire organization.
    • Ease data cleansing, mining, analysis, extraction, and management activities.
    • New data structures may be incompatible with other applications.
    • Implementing data management improvements may be costly and difficult to acquire stakeholder buy-in.
    Update data mining and data warehousing tools
    • Optimize how data is extracted and stored.
    • Increase the speed and reliability of the data mined.
    • Perform complex analysis with modern data mining and data warehousing tools.
    • Data warehouses are regularly updated with the latest data.
    • Updating data mining and warehousing tools may create incompatibilities with existing infrastructure and data sets.
    Integration:
    Move from point-to-point to enterprise service bus (ESB)
    • Change your application integration approach from point-to-point to an ESB.
    • Increase the scalability of enterprise services by exposing applications to a centralized middleware.
    • Reduce the number of integration tests to complete with an ESB.
    • Single point of failure can cripple the entire system.
    • Security threats arising from centralized communication node.
    Leverage API integration
    • Leverage application programming interfaces (APIs) to integrate applications.
    • Quicker and more frequent transfers of lightweight data compared to extract, load, transfer (ETL) practices.
    • Increase integration opportunities with other modern applications and infrastructure (including mobile devices).
    • APIs are not as efficient as ETL when handling large data sets.
    • Changing APIs can break compatibility between applications if not versioned properly.

    Threat Preparedness Using MITRE ATT&CK®

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}252|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Security Strategy & Budgeting
    • Parent Category Link: /security-strategy-and-budgeting
    • To effectively protect your business interests, you need to be able to address what the most pressing vulnerabilities in your network are. Which attack vectors should you model first? How do you adequately understand your threat vectors when attacks continually change and adapt?
    • Security can often be asked the world but given a minimal budget with which to accomplish it.
    • Security decisions are always under pressure from varying demands that pull even the most well-balanced security team in every direction.
    • Adequately modeling any and every possible scenario is ineffective and haphazard at best. Hoping that you have chosen the most pressing attack vectors to model will not work in the modern day of threat tactics.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Precision is critical to being able to successfully defend against threats.
      • Traditional threat modeling such as STRIDE or PASTA is based on a spray-and-pray approach to identifying your next potential threat vector. Instead, take a structured risk-based approach to understanding both an attacker’s tactics and how they may be used against your enterprise. Threat preparedness requires precision, not guesswork.
    • Knowing is half the battle.
      • You may be doing better than you think. Undoubtedly, there is a large surface area to cover with threat modeling. By preparing beforehand, you can separate what’s important from what’s not and identify which attack vectors are the most pressing for your business.
    • Be realistic and measured.
      • Do not try to remediate everything. Some attack vectors and approaches are nearly impossible to account for. Take control of the areas that have reasonable mitigation methods and act on those.
    • Identify blind spots.
      • Understand what is out there and how other enterprises are being attacked and breached. See how you stack up to the myriad of attack tactics that have been used in real-life breaches and how prepared you are. Know what you’re ready for and what you’re not ready for.
    • Analyze the most pressing vectors.
      • Prioritize the attack vectors that are relevant to you. If an attack vector is an area of concern for your business, start there. Do not cover the entire tactics list if certain areas are not relevant.
    • Detection and mitigation lead to better remediation.
      • For each relevant tactic and techniques, there are actionable detection and mitigation methods to add to your list of remediation efforts.

    Impact and Result

    Using the MITRE ATT&CK® framework, Info-Tech’s approach helps you understand your preparedness and effective detection and mitigation actions.

    • Learn about potential attack vectors and the techniques that hostile actors will use to breach and maintain a presence on your network.
    • Analyze your current protocols versus the impact of an attack technique on your network.
    • Discover detection and mitigation actions.
    • Create a prioritized series of security considerations, with basic actionable remediation items. Plan your next threat model by knowing what you’re vulnerable to.
    • Ensure business data cannot be leaked or stolen.
    • Maintain privacy of data and other information.
    • Secure the network connection points.
    • Mitigate risks with the appropriate services.

    This blueprint and associated tool are scalable for all types of organizations within various industry sectors, allowing them to know what types of risk they are facing and what security services are recommended to mitigate those risks.

    Threat Preparedness Using MITRE ATT&CK® Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why threat preparedness is a crucial first step in defending your network against any attack type. Review Info-Tech’s methodology and understand the ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Attack tactics and techniques

    Review a breakdown of each of the various attack vectors and their techniques for additional context and insight into the most prevalent attack tactics.

    • Threat Preparedness Using MITRE ATT&CK® – Phase 1: Attack Tactics and Techniques

    2. Threat Preparedness Workbook mapping

    Map your current security protocols against the impacts of various techniques on your network to determine your risk preparedness.

    • Threat Preparedness Using MITRE ATT&CK® – Phase 2: Threat Preparedness Workbook Mapping
    • Enterprise Threat Preparedness Workbook

    3. Execute remediation and detective measures

    Use your prioritized attack vectors to plan your next threat modeling session with confidence that the most pressing security concerns are being addressed with substantive remediation actions.

    • Threat Preparedness Using MITRE ATT&CK® – Phase 3: Execute Remediation and Detective Measures
    [infographic]

    Mergers & Acquisitions: The Sell Blueprint

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}324|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: IT Strategy
    • Parent Category Link: /it-strategy

    There are four key scenarios or entry points for IT as the selling/divesting organization in M&As:

    • IT can suggest a divestiture to meet the business objectives of the organization.
    • IT is brought in to strategy plan the sale/divestiture from both the business’ and IT’s perspectives.
    • IT participates in due diligence activities and complies with the purchasing organization’s asks.
    • IT needs to reactively prepare its environment to enable the separation.

    Consider the ideal scenario for your IT organization.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    Divestitures are inevitable in modern business, and IT’s involvement in the process should be too. This progression is inspired by:

    • The growing trend for organizations to increase, decrease, or evolve through these types of transactions.
    • A maturing business perspective of IT, preventing the difficulty that IT is faced with when invited into the transaction process late.
    • Transactions that are driven by digital motivations, requiring IT’s expertise.
    • There never being such a thing as a true merger, making the majority of M&A activity either acquisitions or divestitures.

    Impact and Result

    Prepare for a sale/divestiture transaction by:

    • Recognizing the trend for organizations to engage in M&A activity and the increased likelihood that, as an IT leader, you will be involved in a transaction in your career.
    • Creating a standard strategy that will enable strong program management.
    • Properly considering all the critical components of the transaction and integration by prioritizing tasks that will reduce risk, deliver value, and meet stakeholder expectations.

    Mergers & Acquisitions: The Sell Blueprint Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out how your organization can excel its reduction strategy by engaging in M&A transactions. Review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Proactive Phase

    Be an innovative IT leader by suggesting how and why the business should engage in an acquisition or divestiture.

    • One-Pager: M&A Proactive
    • Case Study: M&A Proactive
    • Information Asset Audit Tool
    • Data Valuation Tool
    • Enterprise Integration Process Mapping Tool
    • Risk Register Tool
    • Security M&A Due Diligence Tool
    • Service Catalog Internal Service Level Agreement Template

    2. Discovery & Strategy

    Create a standardized approach for how your IT organization should address divestitures or sales.

    • One-Pager: M&A Discovery & Strategy – Sell
    • Case Study: M&A Discovery & Strategy – Sell

    3. Due Diligence & Preparation

    Comply with due diligence, prepare the IT environment for carve-out possibilities, and establish the separation project plan.

    • One-Pager: M&A Due Diligence & Preparation – Sell
    • Case Study: M&A Due Diligence & Preparation – Sell
    • IT Due Diligence Charter
    • IT Culture Diagnostic
    • M&A Separation Project Management Tool (SharePoint)
    • SharePoint Template: Step-by-Step Deployment Guide
    • M&A Separation Project Management Tool (Excel)

    4. Execution & Value Realization

    Deliver on the separation project plan successfully and communicate IT’s transaction value to the business.

    • One-Pager: M&A Execution & Value Realization – Sell
    • Case Study: M&A Execution & Value Realization – Sell

    Infographic

    Workshop: Mergers & Acquisitions: The Sell Blueprint

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Pre-Transaction Discovery & Strategy

    The Purpose

    Establish the transaction foundation.

    Discover the motivation for divesting or selling.

    Formalize the program plan.

    Create the valuation framework.

    Strategize the transaction and finalize the M&A strategy and approach.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    All major stakeholders are on the same page.

    Set up crucial elements to facilitate the success of the transaction.

    Have a repeatable transaction strategy that can be reused for multiple organizations.

    Activities

    1.1 Conduct the CIO Business Vision and CEO-CIO Alignment diagnostics.

    1.2 Identify key stakeholders and outline their relationship to the M&A process.

    1.3 Understand the rationale for the company's decision to pursue a divestiture or sale.

    1.4 Assess the IT/digital strategy.

    1.5 Identify pain points and opportunities tied to the divestiture/sale.

    1.6 Create the IT vision statement and mission statement and identify IT guiding principles and the transition team.

    1.7 Document the M&A governance.

    1.8 Establish program metrics.

    1.9 Create the valuation framework.

    1.10 Establish the separation strategy.

    1.11 Conduct a RACI.

    1.12 Create the communication plan.

    1.13 Prepare to assess target organizations.

    Outputs

    Business perspectives of IT

    Stakeholder network map for M&A transactions

    Business context implications for IT

    IT’s divestiture/sale strategic direction

    Governance structure

    M&A program metrics

    IT valuation framework

    Separation strategy

    RACI

    Communication plan

    Prepared to assess target organization(s)

    2 Mid-Transaction Due Diligence & Preparation

    The Purpose

    Establish the foundation.

    Discover the motivation for separation.

    Identify expectations and create the carve-out roadmap.

    Prepare and manage employees.

    Plan the separation roadmap.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    All major stakeholders are on the same page.

    Methodology identified to enable compliance during due diligence.

    Employees are set up for a smooth and successful transition.

    Separation activities are planned and assigned.

    Activities

    2.1 Gather and evaluate the stakeholders involved, M&A strategy, future-state operating model, and governance.

    2.2 Review the business rationale for the divestiture/sale.

    2.3 Establish the separation strategy.

    2.4 Create the due diligence charter.

    2.5 Create a list of IT artifacts to be reviewed in the data room.

    2.6 Create a carve-out roadmap.

    2.7 Create a service/technical transaction agreement.

    2.8 Measure staff engagement.

    2.9 Assess the current culture and identify the goal culture.

    2.10 Create employee transition and functional workplans.

    2.11 Establish the separation roadmap.

    2.12 Establish and align project metrics with identified tasks.

    2.13 Estimate integration costs.

    Outputs

    Stakeholder map

    IT strategy assessed

    IT operating model and IT governance structure defined

    Business context implications for IT

    Separation strategy

    Due diligence charter

    Data room artifacts

    Carve-out roadmap

    Service/technical transaction agreement

    Engagement assessment

    Culture assessment

    Employee transition and functional workplans

    Integration roadmap and associated resourcing

    3 Post-Transaction Execution & Value Realization

    The Purpose

    Establish the transaction foundation.

    Discover the motivation for separation.

    Plan the separation roadmap.

    Prepare employees for the transition.

    Engage in separation.

    Assess the transaction outcomes.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    All major stakeholders are on the same page.

    Separation activities are planned and assigned.

    Employees are set up for a smooth and successful transition.

    Separation strategy and roadmap are executed to benefit the organization.

    Review what went well and identify improvements to be made in future transactions.

    Activities

    3.1 Identify key stakeholders and outline their relationship to the M&A process.

    3.2 Gather and evaluate the M&A strategy, future-state operating model, and governance.

    3.3 Review the business rationale for the divestiture/sale.

    3.4 Establish the separation strategy.

    3.5 Prioritize separation tasks.

    3.6 Establish the separation roadmap.

    3.7 Establish and align project metrics with identified tasks.

    3.8 Estimate separation costs.

    3.9 Measure staff engagement.

    3.10 Assess the current culture and identify the goal culture.

    3.11 Create employee transition and functional workplans.

    3.12 Complete the separation by regularly updating the project plan.

    3.13 Assess the service/technical transaction agreement.

    3.14 Confirm separation costs.

    3.15 Review IT’s transaction value.

    3.16 Conduct a transaction and separation SWOT.

    3.17 Review the playbook and prepare for future transactions.

    Outputs

    M&A transaction team

    Stakeholder map

    IT strategy assessed

    IT operating model and IT governance structure defined

    Business context implications for IT

    Separation strategy

    Separation roadmap and associated resourcing

    Engagement assessment

    Culture assessment

    Employee transition and functional workplans

    Updated separation project plan

    Evaluated service/technical transaction agreement

    SWOT of transaction

    M&A Sell Playbook refined for future transactions

    Further reading

    Mergers & Acquisitions: The Sell Blueprint

    For IT leaders who want to have a role in the transaction process when their business is engaging in an M&A sale or divestiture.

    EXECUTIVE BRIEF

    Analyst Perspective

    Don’t wait to be invited to the M&A table, make it.

    Photo of Brittany Lutes, Research Analyst, CIO Practice, Info-Tech Research Group.
    Brittany Lutes
    Research Analyst,
    CIO Practice
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Photo of Ibrahim Abdel-Kader, Research Analyst, CIO Practice, Info-Tech Research Group.
    Ibrahim Abdel-Kader
    Research Analyst,
    CIO Practice
    Info-Tech Research Group

    IT has always been an afterthought in the M&A process, often brought in last minute once the deal is nearly, if not completely, solidified. This is a mistake. When IT is brought into the process late, the business misses opportunities to generate value related to the transaction and has less awareness of critical risks or inaccuracies.

    To prevent this mistake, IT leadership needs to develop strong business relationships and gain respect for their innovative suggestions. In fact, when it comes to modern M&A activity, IT should be the ones suggesting potential transactions to meet business needs, specifically when it comes to modernizing the business or adopting digital capabilities.

    IT needs to stop waiting to be invited to the acquisition or divestiture table. IT needs to suggest that the table be constructed and actively work toward achieving the strategic objectives of the business.

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    There are four key scenarios or entry points for IT as the selling/divesting organization in M&As:

    • IT can suggest a divestiture to meet the business objectives of the organization.
    • IT is brought in to strategy plan the sale/divestiture from both the business’ and IT’s perspectives.
    • IT participates in due diligence activities and complies with the purchasing organization’s asks.
    • IT needs to reactively prepare its environment to enable the separation.

    Consider the ideal scenario for your IT organization.

    Common Obstacles

    Some of the obstacles IT faces include:

    • IT is often told about the transaction once the deal has already been solidified and is now forced to meet unrealistic business demands.
    • The business does not trust IT and therefore does not approach IT to define value or reduce risks to the transaction process.
    • The people and culture element is forgotten or not given adequate priority.

    These obstacles often arise when IT waits to be invited into the transaction process and misses critical opportunities.

    Info-Tech's Approach

    Prepare for a sale/divestiture transaction by:

    • Recognizing the trend for organizations to engage in M&A activity and the increased likelihood that, as an IT leader, you will be involved in a transaction in your career.
    • Creating a standard strategy that will enable strong program management.
    • Properly considering all the critical components of the transaction and integration by prioritizing tasks that will reduce risk, deliver value, and meet stakeholder expectations.

    Info-Tech Insight

    As the number of merger, acquisition, and divestiture transactions continues to increase, so too does IT’s opportunity to leverage the growing digital nature of these transactions and get involved at the onset.

    The changing M&A landscape

    Businesses will embrace more digital M&A transactions in the post-pandemic world

    • When the pandemic occurred, businesses reacted by either pausing (61%) or completely cancelling (46%) deals that were in the mid-transaction state (Deloitte, 2020). The uncertainty made many organizations consider whether the risks would be worth the potential benefits.
    • However, many organizations quickly realized the pandemic is not a hindrance to M&A transactions but an opportunity. Over 16,000 American companies were involved in M&A transactions in the first six months of 2021 (The Economist). For reference, this had been averaging around 10,000 per six months from 2016 to 2020.
    • In addition to this transaction growth, organizations have increasingly been embracing digital. These trends increase the likelihood that, as an IT leader, you will engage in an M&A transaction. However, it is up to you when you get involved in the transactions.

    The total value of transactions in the year after the pandemic started was $1.3 billion – a 93% increase in value compared to before the pandemic. (Nasdaq)

    71% of technology companies anticipate that divestitures will take place as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. (EY, 2020)

    Your challenge

    IT is often not involved in the M&A transaction process. When it is, it’s often too late.

    • The most important driver of an acquisition is the ability to access new technology (DLA Piper), and yet 50% of the time, IT isn’t involved in the M&A transaction at all (IMAA Institute, 2017).
    • Additionally, IT’s lack of involvement in the process negatively impacts the business:
      • Most organizations (60%) do not have a standardized approach to integration (Steeves and Associates), let alone separation.
      • Two-thirds of the time, the divesting organization and acquiring organization will either fail together or succeed together (McKinsey, 2015).
      • Less than half (47%) of organizations actually experience the positive results sought by the M&A transaction (Steeves and Associates).
    • Organizations pursuing M&A and not involving IT are setting themselves up for failure.

    Only half of M&A deals involve IT (Source: IMAA Institute, 2017)

    Common Obstacles

    These barriers make this challenge difficult to address for many organizations:

    • IT is rarely afforded the opportunity to participate in the transaction deal. When IT is invited, this often happens later in the process where separation will be critical to business continuity.
    • IT has not had the opportunity to demonstrate that it is a valuable business partner in other business initiatives.
    • One of the most critical elements that IT often doesn’t take the time or doesn’t have the time to focus on is the people and leadership component.
    • IT waits to be invited to the process rather then actively involving themselves and suggesting how value can be added to the process.

    In hindsight, it’s clear to see: Involving IT is just good business.

    47% of senior leaders wish they would have spent more time on IT due diligence to prevent value erosion. (Source: IMAA Institute, 2017)

    “Solutions exist that can save well above 50 percent on divestiture costs, while ensuring on-time delivery.” (Source: SNP)

    Info-Tech's approach

    Acquisitions & Divestitures Framework

    Acquisitions and divestitures are inevitable in modern business, and IT’s involvement in the process should be too. This progression is inspired by:

    1. The growing trend for organizations to increase, decrease, or evolve through these types of transactions.
    2. Transactions that are driven by digital motivations, requiring IT’s expertise.
    3. A maturing business perspective of IT, preventing the difficulty that IT is faced with when invited into the transaction process late.
    4. There never being such a thing as a true merger, making the majority of M&A activity either acquisitions or divestitures.
    A diagram highlighting the 'IT Executives' Role in Acquisitions and Divestitures' when they are integrated at different points in the 'Core Business Timeline'. There are four main entry points 'Proactive', 'Discovery and Strategy', 'Due Diligence and Preparation', and 'Execution and Value Realized'. It is highlighted that IT can and should start at 'Proactive', but most organizations start at 'Execution and Value Realized'. 'Proactive': suggest opportunities to evolve the organization; prove IT's value and engage in growth opportunities early. Innovators start here. Steps of the business timeline in 'Proactive' are 'Organization strategies are defined' and 'M and A is considered to enable strategy'. After a buy or sell transaction is initiated is 'Discovery and Strategy': pre-transaction state. If it is a Buy transaction, 'Establish IT's involvement and approach'. If it is a Sell transaction, 'Prepare to engage in negotiations'. Business Partners start here. Steps of the business timeline in 'Discovery and Strategy' are 'Searching criteria is set', 'Potential candidates are considered', and 'LOI is sent/received'. 'Due Diligence and Preparation': mid-transaction state. If it is a Buy transaction, 'Identify potential transaction benefits and risks'. If it is a Sell transaction, 'Comply, communicate, and collaborate in transaction'. Trusted Operators start here. Steps of the business timeline in 'Due Diligence and Preparation' are 'Due diligence engagement occurs', 'Final agreement is reached', and 'Preparation for transaction execution occurs'. 'Execution and Value Realization': post-transaction state. If it is a Buy transaction, 'Integrate the IT environments and achieve business value'. If it is a Sell transaction, 'Separate the IT environment and deliver on transaction terms'. Firefighters start here. Steps of the business timeline in 'Execution and Value Realization' are 'Staff and operations are addressed appropriately', 'Day 1 of implementation and integration activities occurs', '1st 100 days of new entity state occur' and 'Ongoing risk mitigating and value creating activities occur'.

    The business’ view of IT will impact how soon IT can get involved

    There are four key entry points for IT

    A colorful visualization of the four key entry points for IT and a fifth not-so-key entry point. Starting from the top: 'Innovator', Information and Technology as a Competitive Advantage, 90% Satisfaction; 'Business Partner', Effective Delivery of Strategic Business Projects, 80% Satisfaction; 'Trusted Operator', Enablement of Business Through Application and Work Orders, 70% Satisfaction; 'Firefighter', Reliable Infrastructure and IT Service Desk, 60% Satisfaction; and then 'Unstable', Inability to Consistently Deliver Basic Services, <60% Satisfaction.
    1. Innovator: IT suggests a sale or divestiture to meet the business objectives of the organization.
    2. Business Partner: IT is brought in to strategy plan the sale/divestiture from both the business’ and IT’s perspective.
    3. Trusted Operator: IT participates in due diligence activities and complies with the purchasing organization’s asks.
    4. Firefighter: IT needs to reactively prepare its environment in order to enable the separation.

    Merger, acquisition, and divestiture defined

    Merger

    A merger looks at the equal combination of two entities or organizations. Mergers are rare in the M&A space, as the organizations will combine assets and services in a completely equal 50/50 split. Two organizations may also choose to divest business entities and merge as a new company.

    Acquisition

    The most common transaction in the M&A space, where an organization will acquire or purchase another organization or entities of another organization. This type of transaction has a clear owner who will be able to make legal decisions regarding the acquired organization.

    Divestiture

    An organization may decide to sell partial elements of a business to an acquiring organization. They will separate this business entity from the rest of the organization and continue to operate the other components of the business.

    Info-Tech Insight

    A true merger does not exist, as there is always someone initiating the discussion. As a result, most M&A activity falls into acquisition or divestiture categories.

    Selling vs. buying

    The M&A process approach differs depending on whether you are the selling or buying organization

    This blueprint is only focused on the sell side:

    • Examples of sell-related scenarios include:
      • Your organization is selling to another organization with the intent of keeping its regular staff, operations, and location. This could mean minimal separation is required.
      • Your organization is selling to another organization with the intent of separating to be a part of the purchasing organization.
      • Your organization is engaging in a divestiture with the intent of:
        • Separating components to be part of the purchasing organization permanently.
        • Separating components to be part of a spinoff and establish a unit as a standalone new company.
    • As the selling organization, you could proactively seek out suitors to purchase all or components of your organization, or you could be approached by an organization.

    The buy side is focused on:

    • More than two organizations could be involved in a transaction.
    • Examples of buy-related scenarios include:
      • Your organization is buying another organization with the intent of having the purchased organization keep its regular staff, operations, and location. This could mean minimal integration is required.
      • Your organization is buying another organization in its entirety with the intent of integrating it into your original company.
      • Your organization is buying components of another organization with the intent of integrating them into your original company.
    • As the purchasing organization, you will probably be initiating the purchase and thus will be valuating the selling organization during due diligence and leading the execution plan.

    For more information on acquisitions or purchases, check out Info-Tech’s Mergers & Acquisitions: The Buy Blueprint.

    Core business timeline

    For IT to be valuable in M&As, you need to align your deliverables and your support to the key activities the business and investors are working on.

    Info-Tech’s methodology for Selling Organizations in Mergers, Acquisitions, or Divestitures

    1. Proactive

    2. Discovery & Strategy

    3. Due Diligence & Preparation

    4. Execution & Value Realization

    Phase Steps

    1. Identify Stakeholders and Their Perspective of IT
    2. Assess IT’s Current Value and Future State
    3. Drive Innovation and Suggest Growth Opportunities
    1. Establish the M&A Program Plan
    2. Prepare IT to Engage in the Separation or Sale
    1. Engage in Due Diligence and Prepare Staff
    2. Prepare to Separate
    1. Execute the Transaction
    2. Reflection and Value Realization

    Phase Outcomes

    Be an innovative IT leader by suggesting how and why the business should engage in an acquisition or divestiture.

    Create a standardized approach for how your IT organization should address divestitures or sales.

    Comply with due diligence, prepare the IT environment for carve-out possibilities, and establish the separation project plan.

    Deliver on the separation project plan successfully and communicate IT’s transaction value to the business.

    Metrics for each phase

    1. Proactive

    2. Discovery & Strategy

    3. Valuation & Due Diligence

    4. Execution & Value Realization

    • % Share of business innovation spend from overall IT budget
    • % Critical processes with approved performance goals and metrics
    • % IT initiatives that meet or exceed value expectation defined in business case
    • % IT initiatives aligned with organizational strategic direction
    • % Satisfaction with IT's strategic decision-making abilities
    • $ Estimated business value added through IT-enabled innovation
    • % Overall stakeholder satisfaction with IT
    • % Percent of business leaders that view IT as an Innovator
    • % IT budget as a percent of revenue
    • % Assets that are not allocated
    • % Unallocated software licenses
    • # Obsolete assets
    • % IT spend that can be attributed to the business (chargeback or showback)
    • % Share of CapEx of overall IT budget
    • % Prospective organizations that meet the search criteria
    • $ Total IT cost of ownership (before and after M&A, before and after rationalization)
    • % Business leaders that view IT as a Business Partner
    • % Defects discovered in production
    • $ Cost per user for enterprise applications
    • % In-house-built applications vs. enterprise applications
    • % Owners identified for all data domains
    • # IT staff asked to participate in due diligence
    • Change to due diligence
    • IT budget variance
    • Synergy target
    • % Satisfaction with the effectiveness of IT capabilities
    • % Overall end-customer satisfaction
    • $ Impact of vendor SLA breaches
    • $ Savings through cost-optimization efforts
    • $ Savings through application rationalization and technology standardization
    • # Key positions empty
    • % Frequency of staff turnover
    • % Emergency changes
    • # Hours of unplanned downtime
    • % Releases that cause downtime
    • % Incidents with identified problem record
    • % Problems with identified root cause
    • # Days from problem identification to root cause fix
    • % Projects that consider IT risk
    • % Incidents due to issues not addressed in the security plan
    • # Average vulnerability remediation time
    • % Application budget spent on new build/buy vs. maintenance (deferred feature implementation, enhancements, bug fixes)
    • # Time (days) to value realization
    • % Projects that realized planned benefits
    • $ IT operational savings and cost reductions that are related to synergies/divestitures
    • % IT staff–related expenses/redundancies
    • # Days spent on IT separation
    • $ Accurate IT budget estimates
    • % Revenue growth directly tied to IT delivery
    • % Profit margin growth

    IT's role in the selling transaction

    And IT leaders have a greater likelihood than ever of needing to support a merger, acquisition, or divestiture.

    1. Reduced Risk

      IT can identify risks that may go unnoticed when IT is not involved.
    2. Increased Accuracy

      The business can make accurate predictions around the costs, timelines, and needs of IT.
    3. Faster Integration

      Faster integration means faster value realization for the business.
    4. Informed Decision Making

      IT leaders hold critical information that can support the business in moving the transaction forward.
    5. Innovation

      IT can suggest new opportunities to generate revenue, optimize processes, or reduce inefficiencies.

    The IT executive’s critical role is demonstrated by:

    • Reduced Risk

      47% of senior leaders wish they would have spent more time on IT due diligence to prevent value erosion (IMAA Institute, 2017).
    • Increased Accuracy

      Sellers often only provide 15 to 30 days for the acquiring organization to decide (Forbes, 2018), increasing the necessity of accurate pricing.
    • Faster Integration

      36% of CIOs have visibility into only business unit data, making the divestment a challenge (EY, 2021).
    • Informed Decision Making

      Only 38% of corporate and 22% of private equity firms include IT as a significant aspect in their transaction approach (IMAA Institute, 2017).
    • Innovation

      Successful CIOs involved in M&As can spend 70% of their time on aspects outside of IT and 30% of their time on technology and delivery (CIO).

    Playbook benefits

    IT Benefits

    • IT will be seen as an innovative partner to the business, and its suggestions and involvement in the organization will lead to benefits, not hindrances.
    • Develop a streamlined method to prepare the IT environment for potential carve-out and separations, ensuring risk management concerns are brought to the business’ attention immediately.
    • Create a comprehensive list of items that IT needs to do during the separation that can be prioritized and actioned.

    Business Benefits

    • The business will get accurate and relevant information about its IT environment in order to sell or divest the company to the highest bidder for a true price.
    • Fewer business interruptions will happen, because IT can accurately plan for and execute the high-priority separation tasks.
    • The business can obtain a high-value offer for the components of IT being sold and can measure the ongoing value the sale will bring.

    Insight summary

    Overarching Insight

    IT controls if and when it gets invited to support the business through a purchasing growth transaction. Take control of the process, demonstrate the value of IT, and ensure that separation of IT environments does not lead to unnecessary and costly decisions.

    Proactive Insight

    CIOs on the forefront of digital transformation need to actively look for and suggest opportunities to acquire or partner on new digital capabilities to respond to rapidly changing business needs.

    Discovery & Strategy Insight

    IT organizations that have an effective M&A program plan are more prepared for the transaction, enabling a successful outcome. A structured strategy is particularly necessary for organizations expected to deliver M&As rapidly and frequently.

    Due Diligence & Preparation Insight

    IT often faces unnecessary separation challenges because of a lack of preparation. Secure the IT environment and establish how IT will retain employees early in the transaction process.

    Execution & Value Realization Insight

    IT needs to demonstrate value and cost savings within 100 days of the transaction. The most successful transactions are when IT continuously realizes synergies a year after the transaction and beyond.

    Blueprint deliverables

    Key Deliverable: M&A Sell Playbook

    The M&A Sell Playbook should be a reusable document that enables your IT organization to successfully deliver on any divestiture transaction.

    Screenshots of the 'M and A Sell Playbook' deliverable.

    M&A Sell One-Pager

    See a one-page overview of each phase of the transaction.

    Screenshots of the 'M and A Sell One-Pagers' deliverable.

    M&A Sell Case Studies

    Read a one-page case study for each phase of the transaction.

    Screenshots of the 'M and A Sell Case Studies' deliverable.

    M&A Separation Project Management Tool (SharePoint)

    Manage the separation process of the divestiture/sale using this SharePoint template.

    Screenshots of the 'M and A Separation Project Management Tool (SharePoint)' deliverable.

    M&A Separation Project Management Tool (Excel)

    Manage the separation process of the divestiture/sale using this Excel tool if you can’t or don’t want to use SharePoint.

    Screenshots of the 'M and A Separation Project Management Tool (Excel)' deliverable.

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    Guided Implementation

    Workshop

    Consulting

    "Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful." "Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track." "We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place." "Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project."

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

    Guided Implementation

    What does a typical GI on this topic look like?

    A Guided Implementation (GI) is a series of calls with an Info-Tech analyst to help implement our best practices in your organization.

    A typical GI is between 6 to 10 calls over the course of 2 to 4 months.

      Proactive Phase

    • Call #1: Scope requirements, objectives, and your specific challenges.
    • Discovery & Strategy Phase

    • Call #2: Determine stakeholders and business perspectives on IT.
    • Call #3: Identify how M&A could support business strategy and how to communicate.
    • Due Diligence & Preparation Phase

    • Call #4: Establish a transaction team and divestiture/sale strategic direction.
    • Call #5: Create program metrics and identify a standard separation strategy.
    • Call #6: Prepare to carve out the IT environment.
    • Call #7: Identify the separation program plan.
    • Execution & Value Realization Phase

    • Call #8: Establish employee transitions to retain key staff.
    • Call #9: Assess IT’s ability to deliver on the divestiture/sale transaction.

    The Sell Blueprint

    Phase 1

    Proactive

    Phase 1

    Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4
    • 1.1 Identify Stakeholders and Their Perspective of IT
    • 1.2 Assess IT’s Current Value and Future State
    • 1.3 Drive Innovation and Suggest Reduction Opportunities
    • 2.1 Establish the M&A Program Plan
    • 2.2 Prepare IT to Engage in the Separation or Sale
    • 3.1 Engage in Due Diligence and Prepare Staff
    • 3.2 Prepare to Separate
    • 4.1 Execute the Transaction
    • 4.2 Reflection and Value Realization

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Conduct the CEO-CIO Alignment diagnostic
    • Conduct the CIO Business Vision diagnostic
    • Visualize relationships among stakeholders to identify key influencers
    • Group stakeholders into categories
    • Prioritize your stakeholders
    • Plan to communicate
    • Valuate IT
    • Assess the IT/digital strategy
    • Determine pain points and opportunities
    • Align goals to opportunities
    • Recommend reduction opportunities

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • IT and business leadership

    What is the Proactive phase?

    Embracing the digital drivers

    As the number of merger, acquisition, or divestiture transactions driven by digital means continues to increase, IT has an opportunity to not just be involved in a transaction but actively seek out potential deals.

    In the Proactive phase, the business is not currently considering a transaction. However, the business could consider one to reach its strategic goals. IT organizations that have developed respected relationships with the business leaders can suggest these potential transactions.

    Understand the business’ perspective of IT, determine who the critical M&A stakeholders are, valuate the IT environment, and examine how it supports the business goals in order to suggest an M&A transaction.

    In doing so, IT isn’t waiting to be invited to the transaction table – it’s creating it.

    Goal: To support the organization in reaching its strategic goals by suggesting M&A activities that will enable the organization to reach its objectives faster and with greater-value outcomes.

    Proactive Prerequisite Checklist

    Before coming into the Proactive phase, you should have addressed the following:

    • Understand what mergers, acquisitions, and divestitures are.
    • Understand what mergers, acquisitions, and divestitures mean for the business.
    • Understand what mergers, acquisitions, and divestitures mean for IT.

    Review the Executive Brief for more information on mergers, acquisitions, and divestitures for selling organizations.

    Proactive

    Step 1.1

    Identify M&A Stakeholders and Their Perspective of IT

    Activities

    • 1.1.1 Conduct the CEO-CIO Alignment diagnostic
    • 1.1.2 Conduct the CIO Business Vision diagnostic
    • 1.1.3 Visualize relationships among stakeholders to identify key influencers
    • 1.1.4 Group stakeholders into categories
    • 1.1.5 Prioritize your stakeholders
    • 1.16 Plan to communicate

    This step involves the following participants:

    • IT executive leader
    • IT leadership
    • Critical M&A stakeholders

    Outcomes of Step

    Understand how the business perceives IT and establish strong relationships with critical M&A stakeholders.

    Business executives' perspectives of IT

    Leverage diagnostics and gain alignment on IT’s role in the organization

    • To suggest or get involved with a merger, acquisition, or divestiture, the IT executive leader needs to be well respected by other members of the executive leadership team and the business.
    • Specifically, the Proactive phase relies on the IT organization being viewed as an Innovator within the business.
    • Identify how the CEO/business executive currently views IT and where they would like IT to move within the Maturity Ladder.
    • Additionally, understand how other critical department leaders view IT and how they view the partnership with IT.
    A colorful visualization titled 'Maturity Ladder' detailing levels of IT function that a business may choose from based on the business executives' perspectives of IT. Starting from the bottom: 'Struggle', Does not embarrass, Does not crash; 'Support', Keeps business happy, Keeps costs low; 'Optimize', Increases efficiency, Decreases costs; 'Expand', Extends into new business, Generates revenue; 'Transform', Creates new industry.

    Misalignment in target state requires further communication between the CIO and CEO to ensure IT is striving toward an agreed-upon direction.

    Info-Tech’s CIO Business Vision (CIO BV) diagnostic measures a variety of high-value metrics to provide a well-rounded understanding of stakeholder satisfaction with IT.

    Sample of Info-Tech's CIO Business Vision diagnostic measuring percentages of high-value metrics like 'IT Satisfaction' and 'IT Value' regarding business leader satisfaction. A note for these two reads 'Evaluate business leader satisfaction with IT this year and last year'. A section titled 'Relationship' has metrics such as 'Understands Needs' and 'Trains Effectively'. A note for this section reads 'Examine relationship indicators between IT and the business'. A section titled 'Security Friction' has metrics such as 'Regulatory Compliance-Driven' and 'Office/Desktop Security'.

    Business Satisfaction and Importance for Core Services

    The core services of IT are important when determining what IT should focus on. The most important services with the lowest satisfaction offer the largest area of improvement for IT to drive business value.

    Sample of Info-Tech's CIO Business Vision diagnostic specifically comparing the business satisfaction of 12 core services with their importance. Services listed include 'Service Desk', 'IT Security', 'Requirements Gathering', 'Business Apps', 'Data Quality', and more. There is a short description of the services, a percentage for the business satisfaction with the service, a percentage comparing it to last year, and a numbered ranking of importance for each service. A note reads 'Assess satisfaction and importance across 12 core IT capabilities'.

    1.1.1 Conduct the CEO-CIO Alignment diagnostic

    2 weeks

    Input: IT organization expertise and the CEO-CIO Alignment diagnostic

    Output: An understanding of an executive business stakeholder’s perception of IT

    Materials: M&A Sell Playbook, CEO-CIO Alignment diagnostic

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, Business executive/CEO

    1. The CEO-CIO Alignment diagnostic can be a powerful input. Speak with your Info-Tech account representative to conduct the diagnostic. Use the results to inform current IT capabilities.
    2. You may choose to debrief the results of your diagnostic with an Info-Tech analyst. We recommend this to help your team understand how to interpret and draw conclusions from the results.
    3. Examine the results of the survey and note where there might be specific capabilities that could be improved.
    4. Determine whether there are any areas of significant disagreement between the you and the CEO. Mark down those areas for further conversations. Additionally, take note of areas that could be leveraged to support transactions or support your rationale in recommending transactions.

    Download the sample report.

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    1.1.2 Conduct the CIO Business Vision diagnostic

    2 weeks

    Input: IT organization expertise, CIO BV diagnostic

    Output: An understanding of business stakeholder perception of certain IT capabilities and services

    Materials: M&A Buy Playbook, CIO Business Vision diagnostic

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, Senior business leaders

    1. The CIO Business Vision (CIO BV) diagnostic can be a powerful tool for identifying IT capability focus areas. Speak with your account representative to conduct the CIO BV diagnostic. Use the results to inform current IT capabilities.
    2. You may choose to debrief the results of your diagnostic with an Info-Tech analyst. We recommend this to help your team understand how to interpret the results and draw conclusions from the diagnostic.
    3. Examine the results of the survey and take note of any IT services that have low scores.
    4. Read through the diagnostic comments and note any common themes. Especially note which stakeholders identified they have a favorable relationship with IT and which stakeholders identified they have an unfavorable relationship. For those who have an unfavorable relationship, identify if they will have a critical role in a growth transaction.

    Download the sample report.

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    Create a stakeholder network map for M&A transactions

    Follow the trail of breadcrumbs from your direct stakeholders to their influencers to uncover hidden stakeholders.

    Example:

    Diagram of stakeholders and their relationships with other stakeholders, such as 'Board Members', 'CFO/Finance', 'Compliance', etc. with 'CIO/IT Leader' highlighted in the middle. There are unidirectional black arrows and bi-directional green arrows indicating each connection.

      Legend
    • Black arrows indicate the direction of professional influence
    • Dashed green arrows indicate bidirectional, informal influence relationships

    Info-Tech Insight

    Your stakeholder map defines the influence landscape that the M&A transaction will occur within. This will identify who holds various levels of accountability and decision-making authority when a transaction does take place.

    Use connectors to determine who may be influencing your direct stakeholders. They may not have any formal authority within the organization, but they may have informal yet substantial relationships with your stakeholders.

    1.1.3 Visualize relationships among stakeholders to identify key influencers

    1-3 hours

    Input: List of M&A stakeholders

    Output: Relationships among M&A stakeholders and influencers

    Materials: Flip charts, Markers, Sticky notes, M&A Sell Playbook

    Participants: IT executive leadership

    1. The purpose of this activity is to list all the stakeholders within your organization that will have a direct or indirect impact on the M&A transaction.
    2. Determine the critical stakeholders, and then determine the stakeholders of your stakeholders and consider adding each of them to the stakeholder list.
    3. Assess who has either formal or informal influence over your stakeholders; add these influencers to your stakeholder list.
    4. Construct a diagram linking stakeholders and their influencers together.
      • Use black arrows to indicate the direction of professional influence.
      • Use dashed green arrows to indicate bidirectional, informal influence relationships.

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    Categorize your stakeholders with a prioritization map

    A stakeholder prioritization map helps IT leaders categorize their stakeholders by their level of influence and ownership in the merger, acquisition, or divestiture process.

    A prioritization map of stakeholder categories split into four quadrants. The vertical axis is 'Influence', from low on the bottom to high on top. The horizontal axis is 'Ownership/Interest', from low on the left to high on the right. 'Spectators' are low influence, low ownership/interest. 'Mediators' are high influence, low ownership/interest. 'Noisemakers' are low influence, high ownership/interest. 'Players' are high influence, high ownership/interest.

    There are four areas in the map, and the stakeholders within each area should be treated differently.

    Players – players have a high interest in the initiative and the influence to effect change over the initiative. Their support is critical, and a lack of support can cause significant impediment to the objectives.

    Mediators – mediators have a low interest but significant influence over the initiative. They can help to provide balance and objective opinions to issues that arise.

    Noisemakers – noisemakers have low influence but high interest. They tend to be very vocal and engaged, either positively or negatively, but have little ability to enact their wishes.

    Spectators – generally, spectators are apathetic and have little influence over or interest in the initiative.

    1.1.4 Group stakeholders into categories

    30 minutes

    Input: Stakeholder map, Stakeholder list

    Output: Categorization of stakeholders and influencers

    Materials: Flip charts, Markers, Sticky notes, M&A Sell Playbook

    Participants: IT executive leadership, Stakeholders

    1. Identify your stakeholders’ interest in and influence on the M&A process as high, medium, or low by rating the attributes below.
    2. Map your results to the model to the right to determine each stakeholder’s category.

    Same prioritization map of stakeholder categories as before. This one has specific stakeholders mapped onto it. 'CFO' is mapped as low interest and middling influence, between 'Mediator' and 'Spectator'. 'CIO' is mapped as higher than average interest and high influence, a 'Player'. 'Board Member' is mapped as high interest and high influence, a 'Player'.

    Level of Influence
    • Power: Ability of a stakeholder to effect change.
    • Urgency: Degree of immediacy demanded.
    • Legitimacy: Perceived validity of stakeholder’s claim.
    • Volume: How loud their “voice” is or could become.
    • Contribution: What they have that is of value to you.
    Level of Interest

    How much are the stakeholder’s individual performance and goals directly tied to the success or failure of the product?

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    Prioritize your stakeholders

    There may be too many stakeholders to be able to manage them all. Focus your attention on the stakeholders that matter most.

    Level of Support

    Supporter

    Evangelist

    Neutral

    Blocker

    Stakeholder Category Player Critical High High Critical
    Mediator Medium Low Low Medium
    Noisemaker High Medium Medium High
    Spectator Low Irrelevant Irrelevant Low

    Consider the three dimensions for stakeholder prioritization: influence, interest, and support. Support can be determined by answering the following question: How significant is that stakeholder to the M&A or divestiture process?

    These parameters are used to prioritize which stakeholders are most important and should receive your focused attention.

    1.1.5 Prioritize your stakeholders

    30 minutes

    Input: Stakeholder matrix

    Output: Stakeholder and influencer prioritization

    Materials: Flip charts, Markers, Sticky notes, M&A Sell Playbook

    Participants: IT executive leadership, M&A/divestiture stakeholders

    1. Identify the level of support of each stakeholder by answering the following question: How significant is that stakeholder to the M&A transaction process?
    2. Prioritize your stakeholders using the prioritization scheme on the previous slide.

    Stakeholder

    Category

    Level of Support

    Prioritization

    CMO Spectator Neutral Irrelevant
    CIO Player Supporter Critical

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    Define strategies for engaging stakeholders by type

    A revisit to the map of stakeholder categories, but with strategies listed for each one, and arrows on the side instead of an axis. The vertical arrow is 'Authority', which increases upward, and the horizontal axis is Ownership/Interest which increases as it moves to the right. The strategy for 'Players' is 'Engage', for 'Mediators' is 'Satisfy', for 'Noisemakers' is 'Inform', and for 'Spectators' is 'Monitor'.

    Type

    Quadrant

    Actions

    Players High influence, high interest – actively engage Keep them updated on the progress of the project. Continuously involve Players in the process and maintain their engagement and interest by demonstrating their value to its success.
    Mediators High influence, low interest – keep satisfied They can be the game changers in groups of stakeholders. Turn them into supporters by gaining their confidence and trust and including them in important decision-making steps. In turn, they can help you influence other stakeholders.
    Noisemakers Low influence, high interest – keep informed Try to increase their influence (or decrease it if they are detractors) by providing them with key information, supporting them in meetings, and using Mediators to help them.
    Spectators Low influence, low interest – monitor They are followers. Keep them in the loop by providing clarity on objectives and status updates.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Each group of stakeholders draws attention and resources away from critical tasks. By properly identifying stakeholder groups, the IT executive leader can develop corresponding actions to manage stakeholders in each group. This can dramatically reduce wasted effort trying to satisfy Spectators and Noisemakers while ensuring the needs of Mediators and Players are met.

    1.1.6 Plan to communicate

    30 minutes

    Input: Stakeholder priority, Stakeholder categorization, Stakeholder influence

    Output: Stakeholder communication plan

    Materials: Flip charts, Markers, Sticky notes, M&A Sell Playbook

    Participants: IT executive leadership, M&A/divestiture stakeholders

    The purpose of this activity is to make a communication plan for each of the stakeholders identified in the previous activities, especially those who will have a critical role in the M&A transaction process.

    1. In the M&A Sell Playbook, input the type of influence each stakeholder has on IT, how they would be categorized in the M&A process, and their level of priority. Use this information to create a communication plan.
    2. Determine the methods and frequency of communication to keep the necessary stakeholder satisfied and maintain or enhance IT’s profile within the organization.

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    Proactive

    Step 1.2

    Assess IT’s Current Value and Method to Achieve a Future State

    Activities

    • 1.2.1 Valuate IT
    • 1.2.2 Assess the IT/digital strategy

    This step involves the following participants:

    • IT executive leader
    • IT leadership
    • Critical stakeholders to M&A

    Outcomes of Step

    Identify critical opportunities to optimize IT and meet strategic business goals through a merger, acquisition, or divestiture.

    How to valuate your IT environment

    And why it matters so much

    • Valuating your current organization’s IT environment is a critical step that all IT organizations should take, whether involved in an M&A or not, to fully understand what it might be worth.
    • The business investments in IT can be directly translated into a value amount. For every $1 invested in IT, the business might be gaining $100 in value back or possibly even loosing $100.
    • Determining, documenting, and communicating this information ensures that the business takes IT’s suggestions seriously and recognizes why investing in IT is so critical.
    • There are three ways a business or asset can be valuated:
      • Cost Approach: Look at the costs associated with building, purchasing, replacing, and maintaining a given aspect of the business.
      • Market Approach: Look at the relative value of a particular aspect of the business. Relative value can fluctuate and depends on what the markets and consequently society believe that particular element is worth.
      • Discounted Cash Flow Approach: Focus on what the potential value of the business could be or the intrinsic value anticipated due to future profitability.
    • (Source: “Valuation Methods,” Corporate Finance Institute)

    Four ways to create value through digital

    1. Reduced costs
    2. Improved customer experience
    3. New revenue sources
    4. Better decision making
    5. (Source: McKinsey & Company)

    1.2.1 Valuate IT

    1 day

    Input: Valuation of data, Valuation of applications, Valuation of infrastructure and operations, Valuation of security and risk

    Output: Valuation of IT

    Materials: Relevant templates/tools listed on the following slides, Capital budget, Operating budget, M&A Sell Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership

    The purpose of this activity is to demonstrate that IT is not simply an operational functional area that diminishes business resources. Rather, IT contributes significant value to the business.

    1. Review each of the following slides to valuate IT’s data, applications, infrastructure and operations, and security and risk. These valuations consider several tangible and intangible factors and result in a final dollar amount.
    2. Input the financial amounts identified for each critical area into a summary slide. Use this information to determine where IT is delivering value to the organization.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Consistency is key when valuating your IT organization as well as other IT organizations throughout the transaction process.

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    Data valuation

    Data valuation identifies how you monetize the information that your organization owns.

    Create a data value chain for your organization

    When valuating the information and data that exists in an organization, there are many things to consider.

    Info-Tech has two tools that can support this process:

    1. Information Asset Audit Tool: Use this tool first to take inventory of the different information assets that exist in your organization.
    2. Data Valuation Tool: Once information assets have been accounted for, valuate the data that exists within those information assets.

    Data Collection

    Insight Creation

    Value Creation

    Data Valuation

    01 Data Source
    02 Data Collection Method
    03 Data
    04 Data Analysis
    05 Insight
    06 Insight Delivery
    07 Consumer
    08 Value in Data
    09 Value Dimension
    10 Value Metrics Group
    11 Value Metrics
    Screenshots of Tab 2 of Info-Tech's Data Valuation Tool.

    Instructions

    1. Using the Data Valuation Tool, start gathering information based on the eight steps above to understand your organization’s journey from data to value.
    2. Identify the data value spectrum. (For example: customer sales service, citizen licensing service, etc.)
    3. Fill out the columns for data sources, data collection, and data first.
    4. Capture data analysis and related information.
    5. Then capture the value in data.
    6. Add value dimensions such as usage, quality, and economic dimensions.
      • Remember that economic value is not the only dimension, and usage/quality has a significant impact on economic value.
    7. Collect evidence to justify your data valuation calculator (market research, internal metrics, etc.).
    8. Finally, calculate the value that has a direct correlation with underlying value metrics.

    Application valuation

    Calculate the value of your IT applications

    When valuating the applications and their users in an organization, consider using a business process map. This shows how business is transacted in the company by identifying which IT applications support these processes and which business groups have access to them. Info-Tech has a business process mapping tool that can support this process:

    • Enterprise Integration Process Mapping Tool: Complete this tool first to map the different business processes to the supporting applications in your organization.

    Instructions

    1. Start by calculating user costs. This is the multiplication of: (# of users) × (% of time spent using IT) × (fully burdened salary).
    2. Identify the revenue per employee and divide that by the average cost per employee to calculate the derived productivity ratio (DPR).
    3. Once you have calculated the user costs and DPR, multiply those total values together to get the application value.
    4. User Costs

      Total User Costs

      Derived Productivity Ratio (DPR)

      Total DPR

      Application Value

      # of users % time spent using IT Fully burdened salary Multiply values from the 3 user costs columns Revenue per employee Average cost per employee (Revenue P.E) ÷ (Average cost P.E) (User costs) X (DPR)

    5. Once the total application value is established, calculate the combined IT and business costs of delivering that value. IT and business costs include inflexibility (application maintenance), unavailability (downtime costs, including disaster exposure), IT costs (common costs statistically allocated to applications), and fully loaded cost of active (full-time equivalent [FTE]) users.
    6. Calculate the net value of applications by subtracting the total IT and business costs from the total application value calculated in step 3.
    7. IT and Business Costs

      Total IT and Business Costs

      Net Value of Applications

      Application maintenance Downtime costs (include disaster exposure) Common costs allocated to applications Fully loaded costs of active (FTE) users Sum of values from the four IT and business costs columns (Application value) – (IT and business costs)

    (Source: CSO)

    Infrastructure valuation

    Assess the foundational elements of the business’ information technology

    The purpose of this exercise is to provide a high-level infrastructure valuation that will contribute to valuating your IT environment.

    Calculating the value of the infrastructure will require different methods depending on the environment. For example, a fully cloud-hosted organization will have different costs than a fully on-premises IT environment.

    Instructions:

    1. Start by listing all of the infrastructure-related items that are relevant to your organization.
    2. Once you have finalized your items column, identify the total costs/value of each item.
      • For example, total software costs would include servers and storage.
    3. Calculate the total cost/value of your IT infrastructure by adding all of values in the right column.

    Item

    Costs/Value

    Hardware Assets Total Value +$3.2 million
    Hardware Leased/Service Agreement -$
    Software Purchased +$
    Software Leased/Service Agreement -$
    Operational Tools
    Network
    Disaster Recovery
    Antivirus
    Data Centers
    Service Desk
    Other Licenses
    Total:

    For additional support, download the M&A Runbook for Infrastructure and Operations.

    Risk and security

    Assess risk responses and calculate residual risk

    The purpose of this exercise is to provide a high-level risk assessment that will contribute to valuating your IT environment. For a more in-depth risk assessment, please refer to the Info-Tech tools below:

    1. Risk Register Tool
    2. Security M&A Due Diligence Tool

    Instructions

    1. Review the probability and impact scales below and ensure you have the appropriate criteria that align to your organization before you conduct a risk assessment.
    2. Identify the probability of occurrence and estimated financial impact for each risk category detail and fill out the table on the right. Customize the table as needed so it aligns to your organization.
    3. Probability of Risk Occurrence

      Occurrence Criteria
      (Classification; Probability of Risk Event Within One Year)

      Negligible Very Unlikely; ‹20%
      Very Low Unlikely; 20 to 40%
      Low Possible; 40 to 60%
      Moderately Low Likely; 60 to 80%
      Moderate Almost Certain; ›80%

    Note: If needed, you can customize this scale with the severity designations that you prefer. However, make sure you are always consistent with it when conducting a risk assessment.

    Financial & Reputational Impact

    Budgetary and Reputational Implications
    (Financial Impact; Reputational Impact)

    Negligible (‹$10,000; Internal IT stakeholders aware of risk event occurrence)
    Very Low ($10,000 to $25,000; Business customers aware of risk event occurrence)
    Low ($25,000 to $50,000; Board of directors aware of risk event occurrence)
    Moderately Low ($50,000 to $100,000; External customers aware of risk event occurrence)
    Moderate (›$100,000; Media coverage or regulatory body aware of risk event occurrence)

    Risk Category Details

    Probability of Occurrence

    Estimated Financial Impact

    Estimated Severity (Probability X Impact)

    Capacity Planning
    Enterprise Architecture
    Externally Originated Attack
    Hardware Configuration Errors
    Hardware Performance
    Internally Originated Attack
    IT Staffing
    Project Scoping
    Software Implementation Errors
    Technology Evaluation and Selection
    Physical Threats
    Resource Threats
    Personnel Threats
    Technical Threats
    Total:

    1.2.2 Assess the IT/digital strategy

    4 hours

    Input: IT strategy, Digital strategy, Business strategy

    Output: An understanding of an executive business stakeholder’s perception of IT, Alignment of IT/digital strategy and overall organization strategy

    Materials: Computer, Whiteboard and markers, M&A Sell Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, Business executive/CEO

    The purpose of this activity is to review the business and IT strategies that exist to determine if there are critical capabilities that are not being supported.

    Ideally, the IT and digital strategies would have been created following development of the business strategy. However, sometimes the business strategy does not directly call out the capabilities it requires IT to support.

    1. On the left half of the corresponding slide in the M&A Sell Playbook, document the business goals, initiatives, and capabilities. Input this information from the business or digital strategies. (If more space for goals, initiatives, or capabilities is needed, duplicate the slide).
    2. On the other half of the slide, document the IT goals, initiatives, and capabilities. Input this information from the IT strategy and digital strategy.

    For additional support, see Build a Business-Aligned IT Strategy.

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    Proactive

    Step 1.3

    Drive Innovation and Suggest Growth Opportunities

    Activities

    • 1.3.1 Determine pain points and opportunities
    • 1.3.2 Align goals with opportunities
    • 1.3.3 Recommend reduction opportunities

    This step involves the following participants:

    • IT executive leader
    • IT leadership
    • Critical M&A stakeholders

    Outcomes of Step

    Establish strong relationships with critical M&A stakeholders and position IT as an innovative business partner that can suggest reduction opportunities.

    1.3.1 Determine pain points and opportunities

    1-2 hours

    Input: CEO-CIO Alignment diagnostic, CIO Business Vision diagnostic, Valuation of IT environment, IT-business goals cascade

    Output: List of pain points or opportunities that IT can address

    Materials: Computer, Whiteboard and markers, M&A Sell Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Business stakeholders

    The purpose of this activity is to determine the pain points and opportunities that exist for the organization. These can be external or internal to the organization.

    1. Identify what opportunities exist for your organization. Opportunities are the potential positives that the organization would want to leverage.
    2. Next, identify pain points, which are the potential negatives that the organization would want to alleviate.
    3. Spend time considering all the options that might exist, and keep in mind what has been identified previously.

    Opportunities and pain points can be trends, other departments’ initiatives, business perspectives of IT, etc.

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    1.3.2 Align goals with opportunities

    1-2 hours

    Input: CEO-CIO Alignment diagnostic, CIO Business Vision diagnostic, Valuation of IT environment, IT-business goals cascade, List of pain points and opportunities

    Output: An understanding of an executive business stakeholder’s perception of IT, Foundations for reduction strategy

    Materials: Computer, Whiteboard and markers, M&A Sell Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Business stakeholders

    The purpose of this activity is to determine whether a growth or separation strategy might be a good suggestion to the business in order to meet its business objectives.

    1. For the top three to five business goals, consider:
      1. Underlying drivers
      2. Digital opportunities
      3. Whether a growth or reduction strategy is the solution
    2. Just because a growth or reduction strategy is a solution for a business goal does not necessarily indicate M&A is the way to go. However, it is important to consider before you pursue suggesting M&A.

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    1.3.3 Recommend reduction opportunities

    1-2 hours

    Input: Growth or separation strategy opportunities to support business goals, Stakeholder communication plan, Rationale for the suggestion

    Output: M&A transaction opportunities suggested

    Materials: M&A Sell Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, Business executive/CEO

    The purpose of this activity is to recommend a merger, acquisition, or divestiture to the business.

    1. Identify which of the business goals the transaction would help solve and why IT is the one to suggest such a goal.
    2. Leverage the stakeholder communication plan identified previously to give insight into stakeholders who would have a significant level of interest, influence, or support in the process.

    Info-Tech Insight

    With technology and digital driving many transactions, leverage your organizations’ IT environment as an asset and reason why the divestiture or sale should happen, suggesting the opportunity yourself.

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    By the end of this Proactive phase, you should:

    Be prepared to suggest M&A opportunities to support your company’s goals through sale or divestiture transactions

    Key outcome from the Proactive phase

    Develop progressive relationships and strong communication with key stakeholders to suggest or be aware of transformational opportunities that can be achieved through sale or divestiture strategies.

    Key deliverables from the Proactive phase
    • Business perspective of IT examined
    • Key stakeholders identified and relationship to the M&A process outlined
    • Ability to valuate the IT environment and communicate IT’s value to the business
    • Assessment of the business, digital, and IT strategies and how M&As could support those strategies
    • Pain points and opportunities that could be alleviated or supported through an M&A transaction
    • Sale or divestiture recommendations

    The Sell Blueprint

    Phase 2

    Discovery & Strategy

    Phase 1

    Phase 2

    Phase 3Phase 4
    • 1.1 Identify Stakeholders and Their Perspective of IT
    • 1.2 Assess IT’s Current Value and Future State
    • 1.3 Drive Innovation and Suggest Reduction Opportunities
    • 2.1 Establish the M&A Program Plan
    • 2.2 Prepare IT to Engage in the Separation or Sale
    • 3.1 Engage in Due Diligence and Prepare Staff
    • 3.2 Prepare to Separate
    • 4.1 Execute the Transaction
    • 4.2 Reflection and Value Realization

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Create the mission and vision
    • Identify the guiding principles
    • Create the future-state operating model
    • Determine the transition team
    • Document the M&A governance
    • Create program metrics
    • Establish the separation strategy
    • Conduct a RACI
    • Create the communication plan
    • Assess the potential organization(s)

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • IT executive/CIO
    • IT senior leadership
    • Company M&A team

    Workshop Overview

    Contact your account representative for more information.
    workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8889

    Pre-Work

    Day 1

    Day 2

    Day 3

    Day 4

    Day 5

    Establish the Transaction FoundationDiscover the Motivation for Divesting or SellingFormalize the Program PlanCreate the Valuation FrameworkStrategize the TransactionNext Steps and Wrap-Up (offsite)

    Activities

    • 0.1 Conduct the CIO Business Vision and CEO-CIO Alignment diagnostics
    • 0.2 Identify key stakeholders and outline their relationship to the M&A process
    • 0.3 Identify the rationale for the company's decision to pursue a divestiture or sale
    • 1.1 Review the business rationale for the divestiture/sale
    • 1.2 Assess the IT/digital strategy
    • 1.3 Identify pain points and opportunities tied to the divestiture/sale
    • 1.4 Create the IT vision statement, create the IT mission statement, and identify IT guiding principles
    • 2.1 Create the future-state operating model
    • 2.2 Determine the transition team
    • 2.3 Document the M&A governance
    • 2.4 Establish program metrics
    • 3.1 Valuate your data
    • 3.2 Valuate your applications
    • 3.3 Valuate your infrastructure
    • 3.4 Valuate your risk and security
    • 3.5 Combine individual valuations to make a single framework
    • 4.1 Establish the separation strategy
    • 4.2 Conduct a RACI
    • 4.3 Review best practices for assessing target organizations
    • 4.4 Create the communication plan
    • 5.1 Complete in-progress deliverables from previous four days
    • 5.2 Set up review time for workshop deliverables and to discuss next steps

    Deliverables

    1. Business perspectives of IT
    2. Stakeholder network map for M&A transactions
    1. Business context implications for IT
    2. IT’s divestiture/sale strategic direction
    1. Operating model for future state
    2. Transition team
    3. Governance structure
    4. M&A program metrics
    1. IT valuation framework
    1. Separation strategy
    2. RACI
    3. Communication plan
    1. Completed M&A program plan and strategy
    2. Prepared to assess target organization(s)

    What is the Discovery & Strategy phase?

    Pre-transaction state

    The Discovery & Strategy phase during a sale or divestiture is a unique opportunity for many IT organizations. IT organizations that can participate in the transaction at this stage are likely considered a strategic partner of the business.

    For one-off sales/divestitures, IT being invited during this stage of the process is rare. However, for organizations that are preparing to engage in many divestitures over the coming years, this type of strategy will greatly benefit from IT involvement. Again, the likelihood of participating in an M&A transaction is increasing, making it a smart IT leadership decision to, at the very least, loosely prepare a program plan that can act as a strategic pillar throughout the transaction.

    During this phase of the pre-transaction state, IT may be asked to participate in ensuring that the IT environment is able to quickly and easily carve out components/business lines and deliver on service-level agreements (SLAs).

    Goal: To identify a repeatable program plan that IT can leverage when selling or divesting all or parts of the current IT environment, ensuring customer satisfaction and business continuity

    Discovery & Strategy Prerequisite Checklist

    Before coming into the Discovery & Strategy phase, you should have addressed the following:

    • Understand the business perspective of IT.
    • Know the key stakeholders and have outlined their relationship to the M&A process.
    • Be able to valuate the IT environment and communicate IT's value to the business.
    • Understand the rationale for the company's decision to pursue a sale or divestiture and the opportunities or pain points the sale should address.

    Discovery & Strategy

    Step 2.1

    Establish the M&A Program Plan

    Activities

    • 2.1.1 Create the mission and vision
    • 2.1.2 Identify the guiding principles
    • 2.1.3 Create the future-state operating model
    • 2.1.4 Determine the transition team
    • 2.1.5 Document the M&A governance
    • 2.1.6 Create program metrics

    This step involves the following participants:

    • IT executive/CIO
    • IT senior leadership
    • Company M&A team

    Outcomes of Step

    Establish an M&A program plan that can be repeated across sales/divestitures.

    The vision and mission statements clearly articulate IT’s aspirations and purpose

    The IT vision statement communicates a desired future state of the IT organization, whereas the IT mission statement portrays the organization’s reason for being. While each serves its own purpose, they should both be derived from the business context implications for IT.

    Vision Statements

    Mission Statements

    Characteristics

    • Describe a desired future
    • Focus on ends, not means
    • Concise
    • Aspirational
    • Memorable
    • Articulate a reason for existence
    • Focus on how to achieve the vision
    • Concise
    • Easy to grasp
    • Sharply focused
    • Inspirational

    Samples

    To be a trusted advisor and partner in enabling business innovation and growth through an engaged IT workforce. (Source: Business News Daily) IT is a cohesive, proactive, and disciplined team that delivers innovative technology solutions while demonstrating a strong customer-oriented mindset. (Source: Forbes, 2013)

    2.1.1 Create the mission and vision statements

    2 hours

    Input: Business objectives, IT capabilities, Rationale for the transaction

    Output: IT’s mission and vision statements for reduction strategies tied to mergers, acquisitions, and divestitures

    Materials: Flip charts/whiteboard, Markers, M&A Sell Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Company M&A team

    The purpose of this activity is to create mission and vision statements that reflect IT’s intent and method to support the organization as it pursues a reduction strategy.

    1. Review the definitions and characteristics of mission and vision statements.
    2. Brainstorm different versions of the mission and vision statements.
    3. Edit the statements until you get to a single version of each that accurately reflects IT’s role in the reduction process.

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    Guiding principles provide a sense of direction

    IT guiding principles are shared, long-lasting beliefs that guide the use of IT in constructing, transforming, and operating the enterprise by informing and restricting IT investment portfolio management, solution development, and procurement decisions.

    A diagram illustrating the place of 'IT guiding principles' in the process of making 'Decisions on the use of IT'. There are four main items, connecting lines naming the type of process in getting from one step to the next, and a line underneath clarifying the questions asked at each step. On the far left, over the question 'What decisions should be made?', is 'Business context and IT implications'. This flows forward to 'IT guiding principles', and they are connected by 'Influence'. Next, over the question 'How should decisions be made?', is the main highlighted section. 'IT guiding principles' flows forward to 'Decisions on the use of IT', and they are connected by 'Guide and inform'. On the far right, over the question 'Who has the accountability and authority to make decisions?', is 'IT policies'. This flows back to 'Decisions on the use of IT', and they are connected by 'Direct and control'.

    IT principles must be carefully constructed to make sure they are adhered to and relevant

    Info-Tech has identified a set of characteristics that IT principles should possess. These characteristics ensure the IT principles are relevant and followed in the organization.

    Approach focused. IT principles should be focused on the approach – how the organization is built, transformed, and operated – as opposed to what needs to be built, which is defined by both functional and non-functional requirements.

    Business relevant. Create IT principles that are specific to the organization. Tie IT principles to the organization’s priorities and strategic aspirations.

    Long lasting. Build IT principles that will withstand the test of time.

    Prescriptive. Inform and direct decision making with actionable IT principles. Avoid truisms, general statements, and observations.

    Verifiable. If compliance can’t be verified, people are less likely to follow the principle.

    Easily Digestible. IT principles must be clearly understood by everyone in IT and by business stakeholders. IT principles aren’t a secret manuscript of the IT team. IT principles should be succinct; wordy principles are hard to understand and remember.

    Followed. Successful IT principles represent a collection of beliefs shared among enterprise stakeholders. IT principles must be continuously communicated to all stakeholders to achieve and maintain buy-in.

    In organizations where formal policy enforcement works well, IT principles should be enforced through appropriate governance processes.

    Consider the example principles below

    IT Principle Name

    IT Principle Statement

    1. Risk Management We will ensure that the organization’s IT Risk Management Register is properly updated to reflect all potential risks and that a plan of action against those risks has been identified.
    2. Transparent Communication We will ensure employees are spoken to with respect and transparency throughout the transaction process.
    3. Separation for Success We will create a carve-out strategy that enables the organization and clearly communicates the resources required to succeed.
    4. Managed Data We will handle data creation, modification, separation, and use across the enterprise in compliance with our data governance policy.
    5.Deliver Better Customer Service We will reduce the number of products offered by IT, enabling a stronger focus on specific products or elements to increase customer service delivery.
    6. Compliance With Laws and Regulations We will operate in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations for both our organization and the potentially purchasing organization.
    7. Defined Value We will create a plan of action that aligns with the organization’s defined value expectations.
    8. Network Readiness We will ensure that employees and customers have immediate access to the network with minimal or no outages.
    9. Value Generator We will leverage the current IT people, processes, and technology to turn the IT organization into a value generator by developing and selling our services to purchasing organizations.

    2.1.2 Identify the guiding principles

    2 hours

    Input: Business objectives, IT capabilities, Rationale for the transaction, Mission and vision statements

    Output: IT’s guiding principles for reduction strategies tied to mergers, acquisitions, and divestitures

    Materials: Flip charts/whiteboard, Markers, M&A Sell Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Company M&A team

    The purpose of this activity is to create the guiding principles that will direct the IT organization throughout the reduction strategy process.

    1. Review the role of guiding principles and the examples of guiding principles that organizations have used.
    2. Brainstorm different versions of the guiding principles. Each guiding principle should start with the phrase “We will…”
    3. Edit and consolidate the statements until you have a list of approximately eight to ten statements that accurately reflect IT’s role in the reduction process.
    4. Review the guiding principles every six months to ensure they continue to support the delivery of the business’ reduction strategy goals.

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    Create two IT teams to support the transaction

    IT M&A Transaction Team

    • The IT M&A Transaction Team should consist of the strongest members of the IT team who can be expected to deliver on unusual or additional tasks not asked of them in normal day-to-day operations.
    • The roles selected for this team will have very specific skills sets or deliver on critical separation capabilities, making their involvement in the combination of two or more IT environments paramount.
    • These individuals need to have a history of proving themselves very trustworthy, as they will likely be required to sign an NDA as well.
    • Expect to have to certain duplicate capabilities or roles across the M&A Team and Operational Team.

    IT Operational Team

    • This group is responsible for ensuring the business operations continue.
    • These employees might be those who are newer to the organization but can be counted on to deliver consistent IT services and products.
    • The roles of this team should ensure that end users or external customers remain satisfied.

    Key capabilities to support M&A

    Consider the following capabilities when looking at who should be a part of the IT Transaction Team.

    Employees who have a significant role in ensuring that these capabilities are being delivered will be a top priority.

    Infrastructure & Operations

    • System Separation
    • Data Management
    • Helpdesk/Desktop Support
    • Cloud/Server Management

    Business Focus

    • Service-Level Management
    • Enterprise Architecture
    • Stakeholder Management
    • Project Management

    Risk & Security

    • Privacy Management
    • Security Management
    • Risk & Compliance Management

    Build a lasting and scalable operating model

    An operating model is an abstract visualization, used like an architect’s blueprint, that depicts how structures and resources are aligned and integrated to deliver on the organization’s strategy.

    It ensures consistency of all elements in the organizational structure through a clear and coherent blueprint before embarking on detailed organizational design.

    The visual should highlight which capabilities are critical to attaining strategic goals and clearly show the flow of work so that key stakeholders can understand where inputs flow in and outputs flow out of the IT organization.

    As you assess the current operating model, consider the following:

    • Does the operating model contain all the necessary capabilities your IT organization requires to be successful?
    • What capabilities should be duplicated?
    • Are there individuals with the skill set to support those roles? If not, is there a plan to acquire or develop those skills?
    • A dedicated project team strictly focused on M&A is great. However, is it feasible for your organization? If not, what blockers exist?
    A diagram with 'Initiatives' and 'Solutions' on the left and right of an area chart, 'Customer' at the top, the area between them labelled 'Functional Area n', and six horizontal bars labelled 'IT Capability' stacked on top of each other. The 'IT Capability' bars are slightly skewed to the 'Solutions' side of the chart.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Investing time up-front getting the operating model right is critical. This will give you a framework to rationalize future organizational changes, allowing you to be more iterative and allowing your model to change as the business changes.

    2.1.3 Create the future-state operating model

    4 hours

    Input: Current operating model, IT strategy, IT capabilities, M&A-specific IT capabilities, Business objectives, Rationale for the transaction, Mission and vision statements

    Output: Future-state operating model for divesting organizations

    Materials: Operating model, Capability overlay, Flip charts/whiteboard, Markers, M&A Sell Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Company M&A team

    The purpose of this activity is to establish what the future-state operating model will be if your organization needs to adjust to support a divestiture transaction. If your organization plans to sell in its entirety, you may choose to skip this activity.

    1. Ensuring that all the IT capabilities are identified by the business and IT strategy, document your organization’s current operating model.
    2. Identify what core capabilities would be critical to the divesting transaction process and separation. Highlight and make copies of those capabilities in the M&A Sell Playbook. As a result of divesting, there may also be capabilities that will become irrelevant in your future state.
    3. Ensure the capabilities that will be decentralized are clearly identified. Decentralized capabilities do not exist within the central IT organization but rather in specific lines of businesses, products, or locations to better understand needs and deliver on the capability.

    An example operating model is included in the M&A Sell Playbook. This process benefits from strong reference architecture and capability mapping ahead of time.

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    2.1.4 Determine the transition team

    3 hours

    Input: IT capabilities, Future-state operating model, M&A-specific IT capabilities, Business objectives, Rationale for the transaction, Mission and vision statements

    Output: Transition team

    Materials: Reference architecture, Organizational structure, Flip charts/whiteboard, Markers

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Company M&A team

    The purpose of this activity is to create a team that will support your IT organization throughout the transaction. Determining which capabilities and therefore which roles will be required ensures that the business will continue to get the operational support it needs.

    1. Based on the outcome of activity 2.1.3, review the capabilities that your organization will require on the transition team. Group capabilities into functional groups containing capabilities that are aligned well with one another because they have similar responsibilities and functionalities.
    2. Replace the capabilities with roles. For example, stakeholder management, requirements gathering, and project management might be one functional group. Project management and stakeholder management might combine to create a project manager role.
    3. Review the examples in the M&A Sell Playbook and identify which roles will be a part of the transition team.

    For more information, see Redesign Your Organizational Structure

    What is governance?

    And why does it matter so much to IT and the M&A process?

    • Governance is the method in which decisions get made, specifically as they impact various resources (time, money, and people).
    • Because M&A is such a highly governed transaction, it is important to document the governance bodies that exist in your organization.
    • This will give insight into what types of governing bodies there are, what decisions they make, and how that will impact IT.
    • For example, funds to support separation need to be discussed, approved, and supplied to IT from a governing body overseeing the acquisition.
    • A highly mature IT organization will have automated governance, while a seemingly non-existent governance process will be considered ad hoc.
    A pyramid with four levels representing the types of governing bodies that are available with differing levels of IT maturity. An arrow beside the pyramid points upward. The bottom of the arrow is labelled 'Traditional (People and document centric)' and the top is labelled 'Adaptive (Data centric)'. Starting at the bottom of the pyramid is level 1 'Ad Hoc Governance', 'Governance that is not well defined or understood within the organization. It occurs out of necessity but often not by the right people'. Level 2 is 'Controlled Governance', 'Governance focused on compliance and decisions driven by hierarchical authority. Levels of authority are defined and often driven by regulatory'. Level 3 is 'Agile Governance', 'Governance that is flexible to support different needs and quick response in the organization. Driven by principles and delegated throughout the company'. At the top of the pyramid is level 4 'Automated Governance', 'Governance that is entrenched and automated into organizational processes and product/service design. Empowered and fully delegated governance to maintain fit and drive organizational success and survival'.

    2.1.5 Document M&A governance

    1-2 hours

    Input: List of governing bodies, Governing body committee profiles, Governance structure

    Output: Documented method on how decisions are made as it relates to the M&A transaction

    Materials: Flip charts/whiteboard, Markers, M&A Sell Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Company M&A team

    The purpose of this activity is to determine the method in which decisions are made throughout the M&A transaction as it relates to IT. This will require understanding both governing bodies internal to IT and those external to IT.

    1. First, determine the other governance structures within the organization that will impact the decisions made about M&A. List out these bodies or committees.
    2. Create a profile for each committee that looks at the membership, purpose of the committee, decision areas (authority), and the process of inputs and outputs. Ensure IT committees that will have a role in this process are also documented. Consider the benefits realized, risks, and resources required for each.
    3. Organize the committees into a structure, identifying the committees that have a role in defining the strategy, designing and building, and running.

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    Current-state structure map – definitions of tiers

    Strategy: These groups will focus on decisions that directly connect to the strategic direction of the organization.

    Design & Build: The second tier of groups will oversee prioritization of a certain area of governance as well as design and build decisions that feed into strategic decisions.

    Run: The lowest level of governance will be oversight of more-specific initiatives and capabilities within IT.

    Expect tier overlap. Some committees will operate in areas that cover two or three of these governance tiers.

    Measure the IT program’s success in terms of its ability to support the business’ M&A goals

    Upper management will measure IT’s success based on your ability to support the underlying reasons for the M&A. Using business metrics will help assure business stakeholders that IT understands their needs and is working with the business to achieve them.

    Business-Specific Metrics

    • Revenue Growth: Increase in the top line as seen by market expansion, product expansion, etc. by percentage/time.
    • Synergy Extraction: Reduction in costs as determined by the ability to identify and eliminate redundancies over time.
    • Profit Margin Growth: Increase in the bottom line as a result of increased revenue growth and/or decreased costs over time.

    IT-Specific Metrics

    • IT operational savings and cost reductions due to synergies: Operating expenses, capital expenditures, licenses, contracts, applications, infrastructure over time.
    • Reduction in IT staff expense and headcount: Decreased budget allocated to IT staff, and ability to identify and remove redundancies in staff.
    • Meeting or improving on IT budget estimates: Delivering successful IT separation on a budget that is the same or lower than the budget estimated during due diligence.
    • Meeting or improving on IT time-to-separation estimates: Delivering successful IT carve-out on a timeline that is the same or shorter than the timeline estimated during due diligence.
    • Business capability support: Delivering the end state of IT that supports the expected business capabilities and growth.

    Establish your own metrics to gauge the success of IT

    Establish SMART M&A Success Metrics

    S pecific Make sure the objective is clear and detailed.
    M easurable Objectives are measurable if there are specific metrics assigned to measure success. Metrics should be objective.
    A ctionable Objectives become actionable when specific initiatives designed to achieve the objective are identified.
    R ealistic Objectives must be achievable given your current resources or known available resources.
    T ime-Bound An objective without a timeline can be put off indefinitely. Furthermore, measuring success is challenging without a timeline.
    • What should IT consider when looking to identify potential additions, deletions, or modifications that will either add value to the organization or reduce costs/risks?
    • Provide a definition of synergies.
    • IT operational savings and cost reductions due to synergies: Operating expenses, capital expenditures, licenses, contracts, applications, infrastructure.
    • Reduction in IT staff expense and headcount: Decreased budget allocated to IT staff, and ability to identify and remove redundancies in staff.
    • Meeting or improving on IT budget estimates: Delivering successful IT separation on a budget that is the same or lower than the budget estimated during due diligence.
    • Meeting or improving on IT time-to-separation estimates: Delivering successful IT carve-out on a timeline that is the same or shorter than the timeline estimated during due diligence.
    • Revenue growth: Increase in the top line as a result, as seen by market expansion, product expansion, etc., as a result of divesting lines of the business and selling service-level agreements to the purchasing organization.
    • Synergy extraction: Reduction in costs, as determined by the ability to identify and eliminate redundancies.
    • Profit margin growth: Increase in the bottom line as a result of increased revenue growth and/or decreased costs.

    Metrics for each phase

    1. Proactive

    2. Discovery & Strategy

    3. Valuation & Due Diligence

    4. Execution & Value Realization

    • % Share of business innovation spend from overall IT budget
    • % Critical processes with approved performance goals and metrics
    • % IT initiatives that meet or exceed value expectation defined in business case
    • % IT initiatives aligned with organizational strategic direction
    • % Satisfaction with IT's strategic decision-making abilities
    • $ Estimated business value added through IT-enabled innovation
    • % Overall stakeholder satisfaction with IT
    • % Percent of business leaders that view IT as an Innovator
    • % IT budget as a percent of revenue
    • % Assets that are not allocated
    • % Unallocated software licenses
    • # Obsolete assets
    • % IT spend that can be attributed to the business (chargeback or showback)
    • % Share of CapEx of overall IT budget
    • % Prospective organizations that meet the search criteria
    • $ Total IT cost of ownership (before and after M&A, before and after rationalization)
    • % Business leaders that view IT as a Business Partner
    • % Defects discovered in production
    • $ Cost per user for enterprise applications
    • % In-house-built applications vs. enterprise applications
    • % Owners identified for all data domains
    • # IT staff asked to participate in due diligence
    • Change to due diligence
    • IT budget variance
    • Synergy target
    • % Satisfaction with the effectiveness of IT capabilities
    • % Overall end-customer satisfaction
    • $ Impact of vendor SLA breaches
    • $ Savings through cost-optimization efforts
    • $ Savings through application rationalization and technology standardization
    • # Key positions empty
    • % Frequency of staff turnover
    • % Emergency changes
    • # Hours of unplanned downtime
    • % Releases that cause downtime
    • % Incidents with identified problem record
    • % Problems with identified root cause
    • # Days from problem identification to root cause fix
    • % Projects that consider IT risk
    • % Incidents due to issues not addressed in the security plan
    • # Average vulnerability remediation time
    • % Application budget spent on new build/buy vs. maintenance (deferred feature implementation, enhancements, bug fixes)
    • # Time (days) to value realization
    • % Projects that realized planned benefits
    • $ IT operational savings and cost reductions that are related to synergies/divestitures
    • % IT staff–related expenses/redundancies
    • # Days spent on IT separation
    • $ Accurate IT budget estimates
    • % Revenue growth directly tied to IT delivery
    • % Profit margin growth

    2.1.6 Create program metrics

    1-2 hours

    Input: IT capabilities, Mission, vision, and guiding principles, Rationale for the acquisition

    Output: Program metrics to support IT throughout the M&A process

    Materials: Flip charts/whiteboard, Markers, M&A Sell Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Company M&A team

    The purpose of this activity is to determine how IT’s success throughout a growth transaction will be measured and determined.

    1. Document a list of appropriate metrics on the whiteboard. Remember to include metrics that demonstrate the business impact. You can use the sample metrics listed on the previous slide as a starting point.
    2. Set a target and deadline for each metric. This will help the group determine when it is time to evaluate progression.
    3. Establish a baseline for each metric based on information collected within your organization.
    4. Assign an owner for tracking each metric as well as someone to be accountable for performance.

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    Discovery & Strategy

    Step 2.2

    Prepare IT to Engage in the Separation or Sale

    Activities

    • 2.2.1 Establish the separation strategy
    • 2.2.2 Conduct a RACI
    • 2.2.3 Create the communication plan
    • 2.2.4 Assess the potential organization(s)

    This step involves the following participants:

    • IT executive/CIO
    • IT senior leadership
    • Company M&A team

    Outcomes of Step

    Identify IT’s plan of action when it comes to the separation/sale and align IT’s separation/sale strategy with the business’ M&A strategy.

    Separation strategies

    There are several IT separation strategies that will let you achieve your target technology environment.

    IT Separation Strategies
    • Divest. Carve out elements of the IT organization and sell them to a purchasing organization with or without a service-level agreement.
    • Sell. Sell the entire IT environment to a purchasing organization. The purchasing organization takes full responsibility in delivering and running the IT environment.
    • Spin-Off Joint Venture. Carve out elements of the IT organization and combine them with elements of a new or purchasing organization to create a new entity.

    The approach IT takes will depend on the business objectives for the M&A.

    • Generally speaking, the separation strategy is well understood and influenced by the frequency of and rationale for selling.
    • Based on the initiatives generated by each business process owner, you need to determine the IT separation strategy that will best support the desired target technology environment, especially if you are still operating or servicing elements of that IT environment.

    Key considerations when choosing an IT separation strategy include:

    • What are the main business objectives of the M&A?
    • What are the key synergies expected from the transaction?
    • What IT separation strategy best helps obtain these benefits?
    • What opportunities exist to position the business for sustainable and long-term growth?

    Separation strategies in detail

    Review highlights and drawbacks of different separation strategies

    Divest
      Highlights
    • Recommended for businesses striving to reduce costs and potentially even generate revenue for the business through the delivery of SLAs.
    • Opportunity to reduce or scale back on lines of business or products that are not driving profits.
      Drawbacks
    • May be forced to give up critical staff that have been known to deliver high value.
    • The IT department is left to deliver services to the purchasing organization with little support or consideration from the business.
    • There can be increased risk and security concerns that need to be addressed.
    Sell
      Highlights
    • Recommended for businesses looking to gain capital to exit the market profitably or to enter a new market with a large sum of capital.
    • The business will no longer exist, and as a result all operational costs, including IT, will become redundant.
      Drawbacks
    • IT is no longer needed as an operating or capital service for the organization.
    • Lost resources, including highly trained and critical staff.
    • May require packaging employees off and using the profit or capital generated to cover any closing costs.
    Spin-Off or Joint Venture
      Highlights
    • Recommended for businesses looking to expand their market presence or acquire new products. Essentially aligning the two organizations in the same market.
    • Each side has a unique offering but complementing capabilities.
      Drawbacks
    • As much as the organization is going through a separation from the original company, it will be going through an integration with the new company.
    • There could be differences in culture.
    • This could require a large amount of investment without a guarantee of profit or success.

    2.2.1 Establish the separation strategy

    1-2 hours

    Input: Business separation strategy, Guiding principles, M&A governance

    Output: IT’s separation strategy

    Materials: Flip charts/whiteboard, Markers, M&A Sell Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Company M&A team

    The purpose of this activity is to determine IT’s approach to separating or selling. This approach might differ slightly from transaction to transaction. However, the businesses approach to transactions should give insight into the general separation strategy IT should adopt.

    1. Make sure you have clearly articulated the business objectives for the M&A, the technology end state for IT, and the magnitude of the overall separation.
    2. Review and discuss the highlights and drawbacks of each type of separation.
    3. Use Info-Tech’s Separation Posture Selection Framework on the next slide to select the separation posture that will appropriately enable the business. Consider these questions during your discussion:
      1. What are the main business objectives of the M&A? What key IT capabilities will need to support business objectives?
      2. What key synergies are expected from the transaction? What opportunities exist to position the business for sustainable growth?
      3. What IT separation best helps obtain these benefits?

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    Separation Posture Selection Framework

    Business M&A Strategy

    Resultant Technology Strategy

    M&A Magnitude (% of Seller Assets, Income, or Market Value)

    IT Separation Posture

    A. Horizontal Adopt One Model ‹100% Divest
    ›99% Sell
    B. Vertical Create Links Between Critical Systems Any Divest
    C. Conglomerate Independent Model Any Joint Venture
    Divest
    D. Hybrid: Horizontal & Conglomerate Create Links Between Critical Systems Any Divest
    Joint Venture

    M&A separation strategy

    Business M&A Strategy Resultant Technology Strategy M&A Magnitude (% of Seller Assets, Income, or Market Value) IT Separation Posture

    You may need a hybrid separation posture to achieve the technology end state.

    M&A objectives may not affect all IT domains and business functions in the same way. Therefore, the separation requirements for each business function may differ. Organizations will often choose to select and implement a hybrid separation posture to realize the technology end state.

    Each business division may have specific IT domain and capability needs that require an alternative separation strategy.

    • Example: Even when conducting a joint venture by forming a new organization, some partners might view themselves as the dominant partner and want to influence the IT environment to a greater degree.
    • Example: Some purchasing organizations will expect service-level agreements to be available for a significant period of time following the divestiture, while others will be immediately independent.

    2.2.2 Conduct a RACI

    1-2 hours

    Input: IT capabilities, Transition team, Separation strategy

    Output: Completed RACI for Transition team

    Materials: Reference architecture, Organizational structure, Flip charts/whiteboard, Markers, M&A Sell Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Company M&A team

    The purpose of this activity is to identify the core accountabilities and responsibilities for the roles identified as critical to your transition team. While there might be slight variation from transaction to transaction, ideally each role should be performing certain tasks.

    1. First, identify a list of critical tasks that need to be completed to support the sale or separation. For example:
      • Communicate with the company M&A team.
      • Identify the key IT solutions that can and cannot be carved out.
      • Gather data room artifacts and provide them to acquiring organization.
    2. Next, identify at the activity level which role is accountable or responsible for each activity. Enter an A for accountable, R for responsible, or A/R for both.

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    Communication and change

    Prepare key stakeholders for the potential changes

    • Anytime you are starting a project or program that will depend on users and stakeholders to give up their old way of doing things, change will force people to become novices again, leading to lost productivity and added stress.
    • Change management can improve outcomes for any project where you need people to adopt new tools and procedures, comply with new policies, learn new skills and behaviors, or understand and support new processes.
    • M&As move very quickly, and it can be very difficult to keep track of which stakeholders you need to be communicating with and what you should be communicating.
    • Not all organizations embrace or resist change in the same ways. Base your change communications on your organization’s cultural appetite for change in general.
      • Organizations with a low appetite for change will require more direct, assertive communications.
      • Organizations with a high appetite for change are more suited to more open, participatory approaches.

    Three key dimensions determine the appetite for cultural change:

    • Power Distance. Refers to the acceptance that power is distributed unequally throughout the organization.
      In organizations with a high power distance, the unequal power distribution is accepted by the less powerful employees.
    • Individualism. Organizations that score high in individualism have employees who are more independent. Those who score low in individualism fall into the collectivism side, where employees are strongly tied to one another or their groups.
    • Uncertainty Avoidance. Describes the level of acceptance that an organization has toward uncertainty. Those who score high in this area find that their employees do not favor uncertain situations, while those that score low in this area find that their employees are comfortable with change and uncertainty.

    2.2.3 Create the communication plan

    1-2 hours

    Input: IT’s M&A mission, vision, and guiding principles, M&A transition team, IT separation strategy, RACI

    Output: IT’s M&A communication plan

    Materials: Flip charts/whiteboard, Markers, RACI, M&A Sell Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Company M&A team

    The purpose of this activity is to create a communication plan that IT can leverage throughout the initiative.

    1. Create a structured communication plan that allows for continuous communication with the integration management office, senior management, and the business functional heads.
    2. Outline key topics of communication, with stakeholders, inputs, and outputs for each topic.
    3. Review Info-Tech’s example communication plan in the M&A Sell Playbook and update it with relevant information.
    4. Does this communication plan make sense for your organization? What doesn’t make sense? Adjust the communication guide to suit your organization.

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    Assessing potential organizations

    As soon as you have identified organizations to consider, it’s imperative to assess critical risks. Most IT leaders can attest that they will receive little to no notice when the business is pursuing a sale and IT has to assess the IT organization. As a result, having a standardized template to quickly assess the potential acquiring organization is important.

    Ways to Assess

    1. News: Assess what sort of news has been announced in relation to the organization. Have they had any risk incidents? Has a critical vendor announced working with them?
    2. LinkedIn: Scan through the LinkedIn profiles of employees. This will give you a sense of what platforms they have based on employees. It will also give insight into positive or negative employee experiences that could impact retention.
    3. Trends: Some industries will have specific solutions that are relevant and popular. Assess what the key players are (if you don’t already know) to determine the solution.
    4. Business Architecture: While this assessment won’t perfect, try to understand the business’ value streams and the critical business and IT capabilities that would be needed to support them. Will your organization or employee skills be required to support these long term?

    Info-Tech Insight

    Assessing potential organizations is not just for the purchaser. The seller should also know what the purchasing organization’s history with M&As is and what potential risks could occur if remaining connected through ongoing SLAs.

    2.2.4 Assess the potential organization(s)

    1-2 hours

    Input: Publicized historical risk events, Solutions and vendor contracts likely in the works, Trends

    Output: IT’s valuation of the potential organization(s) for selling or divesting

    Materials: M&A Sell Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO

    The purpose of this activity is to assess the organization(s) that your organization is considering selling or divesting to.

    1. Complete the Historical Valuation Worksheet in the M&A Sell Playbook to understand the type of IT organization that your company may support.
      • The business likely isn’t looking for in-depth details at this time. However, as the IT leader, it is your responsibility to ensure critical risks are identified and communicated to the business.
    2. Use the information identified to help the business narrow down which organizations could be the right organizations to sell or divest to.

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    By the end of this pre-transaction phase you should:

    Have a program plan for M&As and a repeatable M&A strategy for IT when engaging in reduction transactions

    Key outcomes from the Discovery & Strategy phase
    • Prepare the IT environment to support the potential sale or divestiture by identifying critical program plan elements and establishing a separation or carve-out strategy that will enable the business to reach its goals.
    • Create a M&A strategy that accounts for all the necessary elements of a transaction and ensures sufficient governance, capabilities, and metrics exist.
    Key deliverables from the Discovery & Strategy phase
    • Create vision and mission statements
    • Establish guiding principles
    • Create a future-state operating model
    • Identify the key roles for the transaction team
    • Identify and communicate the M&A governance
    • Determine target metrics
    • Identify the M&A operating model
    • Select the separation strategy framework
    • Conduct a RACI for key transaction tasks for the transaction team
    • Document the communication plan

    M&A Sell Blueprint

    Phase 3

    Due Diligence & Preparation

    Phase 1Phase 2

    Phase 3

    Phase 4
    • 1.1 Identify Stakeholders and Their Perspective of IT
    • 1.2 Assess IT’s Current Value and Future State
    • 1.3 Drive Innovation and Suggest Reduction Opportunities
    • 2.1 Establish the M&A Program Plan
    • 2.2 Prepare IT to Engage in the Separation or Sale
    • 3.1 Engage in Due Diligence and Prepare Staff
    • 3.2 Prepare to Separate
    • 4.1 Execute the Transaction
    • 4.2 Reflection and Value Realization

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Drive value with a due diligence charter
    • Gather data room artifacts
    • Measure staff engagement
    • Assess culture
    • Create a carve-out roadmap
    • Prioritize separation tasks
    • Establish the separation roadmap
    • Identify the buyer’s IT expectations
    • Create a service/transaction agreement
    • Estimate separation costs
    • Create an employee transition plan
    • Create functional workplans for employees
    • Align project metrics with identified tasks

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • IT executive/CIO
    • IT senior leadership
    • Company M&A team
    • Business leaders
    • Purchasing organization
    • Transition team

    Workshop Overview

    Contact your account representative for more information.
    workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8889

    Pre-Work

    Day 1

    Day 2

    Day 3

    Day 4

    Day 5

    Establish the Transaction FoundationDiscover the Motivation for SeparationIdentify Expectations and Create the Carve-Out RoadmapPrepare and Manage EmployeesPlan the Separation RoadmapNext Steps and Wrap-Up (offsite)

    Activities

    • 0.1 Identify the rationale for the company's decision to pursue a divestiture/sale.
    • 0.2 Identify key stakeholders and determine the IT transaction team.
    • 0.3 Gather and evaluate the M&A strategy, future-state operating model, and governance.
    • 1.1 Review the business rationale for the divestiture/sale.
    • 1.2 Identify pain points and opportunities tied to the divestiture/sale.
    • 1.3 Establish the separation strategy.
    • 1.4 Create the due diligence charter.
    • 2.1 Identify the buyer’s IT expectations.
    • 2.2 Create a list of IT artifacts to be reviewed in the data room.
    • 2.3 Create a carve-out roadmap.
    • 2.4 Create a service/technical transaction agreement.
    • 3.1 Measure staff engagement.
    • 3.2 Assess the current culture and identify the goal culture.
    • 3.3 Create an employee transition plan.
    • 3.4 Create functional workplans for employees.
    • 4.1 Prioritize separation tasks.
    • 4.2 Establish the separation roadmap.
    • 4.3 Establish and align project metrics with identified tasks.
    • 4.4 Estimate separation costs.
    • 5.1 Complete in-progress deliverables from previous four days.
    • 5.2 Set up review time for workshop deliverables and to discuss next steps.

    Deliverables

    1. IT strategy
    2. IT operating model
    3. IT governance structure
    4. M&A transaction team
    1. Business context implications for IT
    2. Separation strategy
    3. Due diligence charter
    1. Data room artifacts identified
    2. Carve-out roadmap
    3. Service/technical transaction agreement
    1. Engagement assessment
    2. Culture assessment
    3. Employee transition plans and workplans
    1. Separation roadmap and associated resourcing
    1. Divestiture separation strategy for IT

    What is the Due Diligence & Preparation phase?

    Mid-transaction state

    The Due Diligence & Preparation phase during a sale or divestiture is a critical time for IT. If IT fails to proactively participate in this phase, IT will have to merely react to separation expectations set by the business.

    If your organization is being sold in its entirety, staff will have major concerns about their future in the new organization. Making this transition as smooth as possible and being transparent could go a long way in ensuring their success in the new organization.

    In a divestiture, this is the time to determine where it’s possible for the organization to divide or separate from itself. A lack of IT involvement in these conversations could lead to an overcommitment by the business and under-delivery by IT.

    Goal: To ensure that, as the selling or divesting organization, you comply with regulations, prepare staff for potential changes, and identify a separation strategy if necessary

    Due Diligence Prerequisite Checklist

    Before coming into the Due Diligence & Preparation phase, you must have addressed the following:

    • Understand the rationale for the company's decision to pursue a sale or divestiture and what opportunities or pain points the sale should alleviate.
    • Identify the key roles for the transaction team.
    • Identify the M&A governance.
    • Determine target metrics.
    • Select a separation strategy framework.
    • Conduct a RACI for key transaction tasks for the transaction team.

    Before coming into the Due Diligence & Preparation phase, we recommend addressing the following:

    • Create vision and mission statements.
    • Establish guiding principles.
    • Create a future-state operating model.
    • Identify the M&A operating model.
    • Document the communication plan.
    • Examine the business perspective of IT.
    • Identify key stakeholders and outline their relationship to the M&A process.
    • Be able to valuate the IT environment and communicate IT’s value to the business.

    The Technology Value Trinity

    Delivery of Business Value & Strategic Needs

    • Digital & Technology Strategy
      The identification of objectives and initiatives necessary to achieve business goals.
    • IT Operating Model
      The model for how IT is organized to deliver on business needs and strategies.
    • Information & Technology Governance
      The governance to ensure the organization and its customers get maximum value from the use of information and technology.

    All three elements of the Technology Value Trinity work in harmony to deliver business value and achieve strategic needs. As one changes, the others need to change as well.

    • Digital and IT Strategy tells you what you need to achieve to be successful.
    • IT Operating Model and Organizational Design is the alignment of resources to deliver on your strategy and priorities.
    • Information & Technology Governance is the confirmation of IT’s goals and strategy, which ensures the alignment of IT and business strategy. It’s the mechanism by which you continuously prioritize work to ensure that what is delivered is in line with the strategy. This oversight evaluates, directs, and monitors the delivery of outcomes to ensure that the use of resources results in the achieving the organization’s goals.

    Too often strategy, operating model and organizational design, and governance are considered separate practices. As a result, “strategic documents” end up being wish lists, and projects continue to be prioritized based on who shouts the loudest – not based on what is in the best interest of the organization.

    Due Diligence & Preparation

    Step 3.1

    Engage in Due Diligence and Prepare Staff

    Activities

    • 3.1.1 Drive value with a due diligence charter
    • 3.1.2 Gather data room artifacts
    • 3.1.3 Measure staff engagement
    • 3.1.4 Assess culture

    This step involves the following participants:

    • IT executive/CIO
    • IT senior leadership
    • Company M&A team
    • Business leaders
    • Prospective IT organization
    • Transition team

    Outcomes of Step

    This step of the process is when IT should prepare and support the business in due diligence and gather the necessary information about staff changes.

    3.1.1 Drive value with a due diligence charter

    1-2 hours

    Input: Key roles for the transaction team, M&A governance, Target metrics, Selected separation strategy framework, RACI of key transaction tasks for the transaction team

    Output: IT Due Diligence Charter

    Materials: M&A Sell Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Company M&A team

    The purpose of this activity is to create a charter leveraging the items completed in the previous phase, as listed on the Due Diligence Prerequisite Checklist slide, to gain executive sign-off.

    1. In the IT Due Diligence Charter in the M&A Sell Playbook, complete the aspects of the charter that are relevant for you and your organization.
    2. We recommend including these items in the charter:
      • Communication plan
      • Transition team roles
      • Goals and metrics for the transaction
      • Separation strategy
      • Sale/divestiture RACI
    3. Once the charter has been completed, ensure that business executives agree to the charter and sign off on the plan of action.

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    3.1.2 Gather data room artifacts

    4 hours

    Input: Future-state operating model, M&A governance, Target metrics, Selected separation strategy framework, RACI of key transaction tasks for the transaction team

    Output: List of items to acquire and verify can be provided to the purchasing organization while in the data room

    Materials: Critical domain lists on following slides, M&A Sell Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Company M&A team, Transition team, Legal team, Compliance/privacy officers

    The purpose of this activity is to create a list of the key artifacts that you could be asked for during the due diligence process.

    1. Review the lists on the following pages as a starting point. Identify which domains, stakeholders, artifacts, and information should be requested for the data room.
    2. IT leadership may or may not be asked to enter the data room directly. The short notice for having to find these artifacts for the purchasing organization can leave your IT organization scrambling. Identify the critical items worth obtaining ahead of time.
    3. Once you have identified the artifacts, provide the list to the legal team or compliance/privacy officers and ensure they also agree those items can be provided. If changes to the documents need to be made, take the time to do so.
    4. Store all items in a safe and secure file or provide to the M&A team ahead of due diligence.

    **Note that if your organization is not leading/initiating the data room, then you can ignore this activity.

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    Critical domains

    Understand the key stakeholders and outputs for each domain

    Domain

    Stakeholders

    Key Artifacts

    Key Information to request

    Business
    • Enterprise Architecture
    • Business Relationship Manager
    • Business Process Owners
    • Business capability map
    • Capability map (the M&A team should be taking care of this, but make sure it exists)
    • Business satisfaction with various IT systems and services
    Leadership/IT Executive
    • CIO
    • CTO
    • CISO
    • IT budgets
    • IT capital and operating budgets (from current year and previous year)
    Data & Analytics
    • Chief Data Officer
    • Data Architect
    • Enterprise Architect
    • Master data domains, system of record for each
    • Unstructured data retention requirements
    • Data architecture
    • Master data domains, sources, and storage
    • Data retention requirements
    Applications
    • Applications Manager
    • Application Portfolio Manager
    • Application Architect
    • Applications map
    • Applications inventory
    • Applications architecture
    • Copy of all software license agreements
    • Copy of all software maintenance agreements
    Infrastructure
    • Head of Infrastructure
    • Enterprise Architect
    • Infrastructure Architect
    • Infrastructure Manager
    • Infrastructure map
    • Infrastructure inventory
    • Network architecture (including which data centers host which infrastructure and applications)
    • Inventory (including separation capabilities of vendors, versions, switches, and routers)
    • Copy of all hardware lease or purchase agreements
    • Copy of all hardware maintenance agreements
    • Copy of all outsourcing/external service provider agreements
    • Copy of all service-level agreements for centrally provided, shared services and systems
    Products and Services
    • Product Manager
    • Head of Customer Interactions
    • Product lifecycle
    • Product inventory
    • Customer market strategy

    Critical domains (continued)

    Understand the key stakeholders and outputs for each domain

    Domain

    Stakeholders

    Key Artifacts

    Key Information to request

    Operations
    • Head of Operations
    • Service catalog
    • Service overview
    • Service owners
    • Access policies and procedures
    • Availability and service levels
    • Support policies and procedures
    • Costs and approvals (internal and customer costs)
    IT Processes
    • CIO
    • IT Management
    • VP of IT Governance
    • VP of IT Strategy
    • IT process flow diagram
    • Processes in place and productivity levels (capacity)
    • Critical processes/processes the organization feels they do particularly well
    IT People
    • CIO
    • VP of Human Resources
    • IT organizational chart
    • Competency & capacity assessment
    • IT organizational structure (including resources from external service providers such as contractors) with appropriate job descriptions or roles and responsibilities
    • IT headcount and location
    Security
    • CISO
    • Security Architect
    • Security posture
    • Information security staff
    • Information security service providers
    • Information security tools
    • In-flight information security projects
    Projects
    • Head of Projects
    • Project portfolio
    • List of all future, ongoing, and recently completed projects
    Vendors
    • Head of Vendor Management
    • License inventory
    • Inventory (including what will and will not be transitioning, vendors, versions, number of licenses)

    Retain top talent throughout the transition

    Focus on retention and engagement

    • People are such a critical component of this process, especially in the selling organization.
    • Retaining employees, especially the critical employees who hold specific skills or knowledge, will ensure the success and longevity of the divesting organization, purchasing organization, or the new company.
    • Giving employees a role in the organization and ensuring they do not see their capabilities as redundant will be critical to the process.
    • It is okay if employees need to change what they were doing temporarily or even long-term. However, being transparent about these changes and highlighting their value to the process and organization(s) will help.
    • The first step to moving forward with retention is to look at the baseline engagement and culture of employees and the organization. This will help determine where to focus and allow you to identify changes in engagement that resulted from the transaction.
    • Job engagement drivers are levers that influence the engagement of employees in their day-to-day roles.
    • Organizational engagement drivers are levers that influence an employee’s engagement with the broader organization.
    • Retention drivers are employment needs. They don’t necessarily drive engagement, but they must be met for engagement to be possible.

    3.1.3 Measure staff engagement

    3-4 hours

    Input: Engagement survey

    Output: Baseline engagement scores

    Materials: Build an IT Employee Engagement Program

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, IT employees of current organization

    The purpose of this activity is to measure current staff engagement to have a baseline to measure against in the future state. This is a good activity to complete if you will be divesting or selling in entirety.

    The results from the survey should act as a baseline to determine what the organization is doing well in terms of employee engagement and what drivers could be improved upon.

    1. Review Info-Tech’s Build an IT Employee Engagement Program research and select a survey that will best meet your needs.
    2. Conduct the survey and note which drivers employees are currently satisfied with. Likewise, note where there are opportunities.
    3. Document actions that should be taken to mitigate the negative engagement drivers throughout the transaction and enhance or maintain the positive engagement drivers.

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    Assess culture as a part of engagement

    Culture should not be overlooked, especially as it relates to the separation of IT environments

    • There are three types of culture that need to be considered.
    • Most importantly, this transition is an opportunity to change the culture that might exist in your organization’s IT environment.
    • Make a decision on which type of culture you’d like IT to have post transition.

    Target Organization's Culture. The culture that the target organization is currently embracing. Their established and undefined governance practices will lend insight into this.

    Your Organization’s Culture. The culture that your organization is currently embracing. Examine people’s attitudes and behaviors within IT toward their jobs and the organization.

    Ideal Culture. What will the future culture of the IT organization be once separation is complete? Are there aspects that your current organization and the target organization embrace that are worth considering?

    Culture categories

    Map the results of the IT Culture Diagnostic to an existing framework

    Competitive
    • Autonomy
    • Confront conflict directly
    • Decisive
    • Competitive
    • Achievement oriented
    • Results oriented
    • High performance expectations
    • Aggressive
    • High pay for good performance
    • Working long hours
    • Having a good reputation
    • Being distinctive/different
    Innovative
    • Adaptable
    • Innovative
    • Quick to take advantage of opportunities
    • Risk taking
    • Opportunities for professional growth
    • Not constrained by rules
    • Tolerant
    • Informal
    • Enthusiastic
    Traditional
    • Stability
    • Reflective
    • Rule oriented
    • Analytical
    • High attention to detail
    • Organized
    • Clear guiding philosophy
    • Security of employment
    • Emphasis on quality
    • Focus on safety
    Cooperative
    • Team oriented
    • Fair
    • Praise for good performance
    • Supportive
    • Calm
    • Developing friends at work
    • Socially responsible

    Culture Considerations

    • What culture category was dominant for each IT organization?
    • Do you share the same dominant category?
    • Is your current dominant culture category the most ideal to have post-separation?

    3.1.4 Assess Culture

    3-4 hours

    Input: Cultural assessments for current IT organization, Cultural assessment for target IT organization

    Output: Goal for IT culture

    Materials: IT Culture Diagnostic

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, IT employees of current organization, IT employees of target organization, Company M&A team

    The purpose of this activity is to assess the different cultures that might exist within the IT environments of the organizations involved. By understanding the culture that exists in the purchasing organization, you can identify the fit and prepare impacted staff for potential changes.

    1. Complete this activity by leveraging the blueprint Fix Your IT Culture, specifically the IT Culture Diagnostic.
    2. Fill out the diagnostic for the IT department in your organization:
      1. Answer the 16 questions in tab 2, Diagnostic.
      2. Find out your dominant culture and review recommendations in tab 3, Results.
    3. Document the results from tab 3, Results, in the M&A Sell Playbook if you are trying to record all artifacts related to the transaction in one place.
    4. Repeat the activity for the purchasing organization.
    5. Leverage the information to determine what the goal for the culture of IT will be post-separation if it will differ from the current culture.

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    Due Diligence & Preparation

    Step 3.2

    Prepare to Separate

    Activities

    • 3.2.1 Create a carve-out roadmap
    • 3.2.2 Prioritize separation tasks
    • 3.2.3 Establish the separation roadmap
    • 3.2.4 Identify the buyer’s IT expectations
    • 3.2.5 Create a service/transaction agreement
    • 3.2.6 Estimate separation costs
    • 3.2.7 Create an employee transition plan
    • 3.2.8 Create functional workplans for employees
    • 3.2.9 Align project metrics with identified tasks

    This step involves the following participants:

    • IT executive/CIO
    • IT senior leadership
    • Transition team
    • Company M&A team
    • Purchasing organization

    Outcomes of Step

    Have an established plan of action toward separation across all domains and a strategy toward resources.

    Don’t underestimate the importance of separation preparation

    Separation involves taking the IT organization and dividing it into two or more separate entities.

    Testing the carve capabilities of the IT organization often takes 3 months. (Source: Cognizant, 2014)

    Daimler-Benz lost nearly $19 billion following its purchase of Chrysler by failing to recognize the cultural differences that existed between the two car companies. (Source: Deal Room)

    Info-Tech Insight

    Separating the IT organization requires more time and effort than business leaders will know. Frequently communicate challenges and lost opportunities when carving the IT environment out.

    Separation needs

    Identify the business objectives of the sale to determine the IT strategy

    Set up a meeting with your IT due diligence team to:

    • Ensure there will be no gaps in the delivery of products and services in the future state.
    • Discuss the people and processes necessary to achieve the target technology environment and support M&A business objectives.

    Use this opportunity to:

    • Identify data and application complexities between the involved organizations.
    • Identify the IT people and process gaps, initiatives, and levels of support expected.
    • Determine your infrastructure needs to ensure effectiveness and delivery of services:
      • Does IT have the infrastructure to support the applications and business capabilities?
      • Identify any gaps between the current infrastructure in both organizations and the infrastructure required.
      • Identify any redundancies/gaps.
      • Determine the appropriate IT separation strategies.
    • Document your gaps, redundancies, initiatives, and assumptions to help you track and justify the initiatives that must be undertaken and help estimate the cost of separation.

    Separation strategies

    There are several IT separation strategies that will let you achieve your target technology environment.

    IT Separation Strategies
    • Divest. Carve out elements of the IT organization and sell them to a purchasing organization with or without a service-level agreement.
    • Sell. Sell the entire IT environment to a purchasing organization. The purchasing organization takes full responsibility in delivering and running the IT environment.
    • Spin-Off Joint Venture. Carve out elements of the IT organization and combine them with elements of a new or purchasing organization to create a new entity.

    The approach IT takes will depend on the business objectives for the M&A.

    • Generally speaking, the separation strategy is well understood and influenced by the frequency of and rationale for selling.
    • Based on the initiatives generated by each business process owner, you need to determine the IT separation strategy that will best support the desired target technology environment, especially if you are still operating or servicing elements of that IT environment.

    Key considerations when choosing an IT separation strategy include:

    • What are the main business objectives of the M&A?
    • What are the key synergies expected from the transaction?
    • What IT separation strategy best helps obtain these benefits?
    • What opportunities exist to position the business for sustainable and long-term growth?

    Separation strategies in detail

    Review highlights and drawbacks of different separation strategies

    Divest
      Highlights
    • Recommended for businesses striving to reduce costs and potentially even generate revenue for the business through the delivery of SLAs.
    • Opportunity to reduce or scale back on lines of business or products that are not driving profits.
      Drawbacks
    • May be forced to give up critical staff that have been known to deliver high value.
    • The IT department is left to deliver services to the purchasing organization with little support or consideration from the business.
    • There can be increased risk and security concerns that need to be addressed.
    Sell
      Highlights
    • Recommended for businesses looking to gain capital to exit the market profitably or to enter a new market with a large sum of capital.
    • The business will no longer exist, and as a result all operational costs, including IT, will become redundant.
      Drawbacks
    • IT is no longer needed as an operating or capital service for the organization.
    • Lost resources, including highly trained and critical staff.
    • May require packaging employees off and using the profit or capital generated to cover any closing costs.
    Spin-Off or Joint Venture
      Highlights
    • Recommended for businesses looking to expand their market presence or acquire new products. Essentially aligning the two organizations in the same market.
    • Each side has a unique offering but complementing capabilities.
      Drawbacks
    • As much as the organization is going through a separation from the original company, it will be going through an integration with the new company.
    • There could be differences in culture.
    • This could require a large amount of investment without a guarantee of profit or success.

    Preparing the carve-out roadmap

    And why it matters so much

    • When carving out the IT environment in preparation for a divestiture, it’s important to understand the infrastructure, application, and data connections that might exist.
    • Much to the business’ surprise, carving out the IT environment is not easy, especially when considering the services and products that might depend on access to certain applications or data sets.
    • Once the business has indicated which elements they anticipate divesting, be prepared for testing the functionality and ability of this carve-out, either through automation or manually. There are benefits and drawbacks to both methods:
      • Automated requires a solution and a developer to code the tests.
      • Manual requires time to find the errors, possibly more time than automated testing.
    • Identify if there are dependencies that will make the carve-out difficult.
      • For example, the business is trying to divest Product X, but that product is integrated with Product Y, which is not being sold.
      • Consider all the processes and products that specific data might support as well.
      • Moreover, the data migration tool will need to enter the ERP system and identify not just the data but all supporting and historical elements that underlie the data.

    Critical components to consider:

    • Selecting manual or automated testing
    • Determining data dependencies
    • Data migration capabilities
    • Auditing approval
    • People and skills that support specific elements being carved out

    3.2.1 Create a carve-out roadmap

    6 hours

    Input: Items included in the carve-out, Dependencies, Whether testing is completed, If the carve-out will pass audit, If the carve-out item is prepared to be separated

    Output: Carve-out roadmap

    Materials: Business’ divestiture plan, M&A Sell Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Business leaders, Transition team

    The purpose of this activity is to prepare the IT environment by identifying a carve-out roadmap, specifically looking at data, infrastructure, and applications. Feel free to expand the roadmap to include other categories as your organization sees fit.

    1. In the Carve-Out Roadmap in the M&A Sell Playbook, identify the key elements of the carve-out in the first column.
    2. Note any dependencies the items might have. For example:
      • The business is selling Product X, which is linked to Data X and Data Y. The organization does not want to sell Data Y. Data X would be considered dependent on Data Y.
    3. Once the dependencies have been confirmed, begin automated or manual testing to examine the possibility of separating the data sets (or other dependencies) from one another.
    4. After identifying an acceptable method of separation, inform the auditing individual or body and confirm that there would be no repercussions for the planned process.

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    3.2.2 Prioritize separation tasks

    2 hours

    Input: Separation tasks, Transition team, M&A RACI

    Output: Prioritized separation list

    Materials: Separation task checklist, Separation roadmap

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Company M&A team

    The purpose of this activity is to prioritize the different separation tasks that your organization has identified as necessary to this transaction. Some tasks might not be relevant for this particular transaction, and others might be critical.

    1. Begin by downloading the SharePoint or Excel version of the M&A Separation Project Management Tool.
    2. Identify which separation tasks you want to have as part of your project plan. Alter or remove any tasks that are irrelevant to your organization. Add in tasks you think are missing.
    3. When deciding criticality of the task, consider the effect on stakeholders, those who are impacted or influenced in the process of the task, and dependencies (e.g. data strategy needs to be addressed first before you can tackle its dependencies, like data quality).
    4. Feel free to edit the way you measure criticality. The standard tool leverages a three-point scale. At the end, you should have a list of tasks in priority order based on criticality.

    Record the updates in the M&A Separation Project Management Tool (SharePoint).

    Record the updates in the M&A Separation Project Management Tool (Excel).

    Separation checklists

    Prerequisite Checklist
    • Build the project plan for separation and prioritize activities
      • Plan first day
      • Plan first 30/100 days
      • Plan first year
    • Create an organization-aligned IT strategy
    • Identify critical stakeholders
    • Create a communication strategy
    • Understand the rationale for the sale or divestiture
    • Develop IT's sale/divestiture strategy
      • Determine goal opportunities
      • Create the mission and vision statements
      • Create the guiding principles
      • Create program metrics
    • Consolidate reports from due diligence/data room
    • Conduct culture assessment
    • Create a transaction team
    • Establish a service/technical transaction agreement
    • Plan and communicate culture changes
    • Create an employee transition plan
    • Assess baseline engagement
    Business
    • Design an enterprise architecture
    • Document your business architecture
    • Meet compliance and regulatory standards
    • Identify and assess all of IT's risks
    Applications
    • Prioritize and address critical applications
      • CRM
      • HRIS
      • Financial
      • Sales
      • Risk
      • Security
      • ERP
      • Email
    • Develop method of separating applications
    • Model critical applications that have dependencies on one another
    • Identify the infrastructure capacity required to support critical applications
    • Prioritize and address critical applications
    Leadership/IT Executive
    • Build an IT budget
    • Structure operating budget
    • Structure capital budget
    • Identify the workforce demand vs. capacity
    • Establish and monitor key metrics
    • Communicate value realized/cost savings
    Data
    • Confirm data strategy
    • Confirm data governance
    • Build a data architecture roadmap
    • Analyze data sources and domains
    • Evaluate data storage (on-premises vs. cloud)
    • Develop an enterprise content management strategy and roadmap
    • Ensure cleanliness/usability of data sets
    • Identify data sets that can remain operational if reduced/separated
    • Develop reporting and analytics capabilities
    • Confirm data strategy
    Operations
    • Manage sales access to customer data
    • Determine locations and hours of operation
    • Separate/terminate phone lists and extensions
    • Split email address books
    • Communicate helpdesk/service desk information

    Separation checklists (continued)

    Infrastructure
    • Manage organization domains
    • Consolidate data centers
    • Compile inventory of vendors, versions, switches, and routers
    • Review hardware lease or purchase agreements
    • Review outsourcing/service provider agreements
    • Review service-level agreements
    • Assess connectivity linkages between locations
    • Plan to migrate to a single email system if necessary
    • Determine network access concerns
    Vendors
    • Establish a sustainable vendor management office
    • Review vendor landscape
    • Identify warranty options
    • Identify the licensing grant
    • Rationalize vendor services and solutions
    People
    • Design an IT operating model
    • Design your future IT organizational structure
    • Conduct a RACI for prioritized activities
    • Conduct a culture assessment and identify goal IT culture
    • Build an IT employee engagement program
    • Determine critical roles and systems/process/products they support
    • Define new job descriptions with meaningful roles and responsibilities
    • Create employee transition plans
    • Create functional workplans
    Projects
    • Identify projects to be on hold
    • Communicate project intake process
    • Reprioritize projects
    Products & Services
    • Redefine service catalog
    • Ensure customer interaction requirements are met
    • Select a solution for product lifecycle management
    • Plan service-level agreements
    Security
    • Conduct a security assessment
    • Develop accessibility prioritization and schedule
    • Establish an information security strategy
    • Develop a security awareness and training program
    • Develop and manage security governance, risk, and compliance
    • Identify security budget
    • Build a data privacy and classification program
    IT Processes
    • Evaluate current process models
    • Determine productivity/capacity levels of processes
    • Identify processes to be changed/terminated
    • Establish a communication plan
    • Develop a change management process
    • Establish/review IT policies
    • Evaluate current process models

    3.2.2 Establish the separation roadmap

    2 hours

    Input: Prioritized separation tasks, Carve-out roadmap, Employee transition plan, Separation RACI, Costs for activities, Activity owners

    Output: Separation roadmap

    Materials: M&A Separation Project Plan Tool (SharePoint), M&A Separation Project Plan Tool (Excel), SharePoint Template: Step-by-Step Deployment Guide

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Transition team, Company M&A team

    The purpose of this activity is to create a roadmap to support IT throughout the separation process. Using the information gathered in previous activities, you can create a roadmap that will ensure a smooth separation.

    1. Use our Separation Project Management Tool to help track critical elements in relation to the separation project. There are a few options available:
      1. Follow the instructions on the next slide if you are looking to upload our SharePoint project template. Additional instructions are available in the SharePoint Template Step-by-Step Deployment Guide.
      2. If you cannot or do not want to use SharePoint as your project management solution, download our Excel version of the tool.
        **Remember that this your tool, so customize to your liking.
    2. Identify who will own or be accountable for each of the separation tasks and establish the time frame for when each project should begin and end. This will confirm which tasks should be prioritized.

    Record the updates in the M&A Separation Project Management Tool (SharePoint).

    Record the updates in the M&A Separation Project Management Tool (Excel).

    Separation Project Management Tool (SharePoint Template)

    Follow these instructions to upload our template to your SharePoint environment

    1. Create or use an existing SP site.
    2. Download the M&A Separation Project Management Tool (SharePoint) .wsp file from the Mergers & Acquisitions: The Sell Blueprint landing page.
    3. To import a template into your SharePoint environment, do the following:
      1. Open PowerShell.
      2. Connect-SPO Service (need to install PowerShell module).
      3. Enter in your tenant admin URL.
      4. Enter in your admin credentials.
      5. Set-SPO Site https://YourDomain.sharepoint.com/sites/YourSiteHe... -DenyAddAndCustomizePages 0
      OR
      1. Turn on both custom script features to allow users to run custom
    4. Screenshot of the 'Custom Script' option for importing a template into your SharePoint environment. Feature description reads 'Control whether users can run custom script on personal sites and self-service created sites. Note: changes to this setting might take up to 24 hours to take effect. For more information, see http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkIn=397546'. There are options to prevent or allow users from running custom script on personal/self-service created sites.
    5. Enable the SharePoint Server feature.
    6. Upload the .wsp file in Solutions Gallery.
    7. Deploy by creating a subsite and select from custom options.
      • Allow or prevent custom script
      • Security considerations of allowing custom script
      • Save, download, and upload a SharePoint site as a template
    8. Refer to Microsoft documentation to understand security considerations and what is and isn’t supported:

    For more information, check out the SharePoint Template: Step-by-Step Deployment Guide.

    Supporting the transition and establishing service-level agreements

    The purpose of this part of the transition is to ensure both buyer and seller have a full understanding of expectations for after the transaction.

    • Once the organizations have decided to move forward with a deal, all parties need a clear level of agreement.
    • IT, since it is often seen as an operational division of an organization, is often expected to deliver certain services or products once the transaction has officially closed.
    • The purchasing organization or the new company might depend on IT to deliver these services until they are able to provide those services on their own.
    • Having a clear understanding of what the buyer’s expectations are and what your company, as the selling organization, can provide is important.
    • Have a conversation with the buyer and document those expectations in a signed service agreement.

    3.2.4 Identify the buyer's IT expectations

    3-4 hours

    Input: Carve-out roadmap, Separation roadmap, Up-to-date version of the agreement

    Output: Buyer’s IT expectations

    Materials: Questions for meeting

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Company M&A team, Purchasing company M&A team, Purchasing company IT leadership

    The purpose of this activity is to determine if the buyer has specific service expectations for your IT organization. By identifying, documenting, and agreeing on what services your IT organization will be responsible for, you can obtain a final agreement to protect you as the selling organization.

    1. Buyers should not assume certain services will be provided. Organize a meeting with IT leaders and the company M&A teams to determine what services will be provided.
    2. The next slide has a series of questions that you can start from. Ensure you get detailed information about each of the services.
    3. Once you fully understand the buyer’s IT expectations, create an SLA in the next activity and obtain sign-off from both organizations.

    Questions to ask the buyer

    1. What services would you like my IT organization to provide?
    2. How long do you anticipate those services will be provided to you?
    3. How do you expect your staff/employees to communicate requests or questions to my staff/employees?
    4. Are there certain days or times that you expect these services to be delivered?
    5. How many staff do you expect should be available to support you?
    6. What should be the acceptable response time on given service requests?
    7. When it comes to the services you require, what level of support should we provide?
    8. If a service requires escalation to Level 2 or Level 3 support, are we still expected to support this service? Or are we only Level 1 support?
    9. What preventative security methods does your organization have to protect our environment during this agreement period?

    3.2.5 Create a service/ transaction agreement

    6 hours

    Input: Buyer's expectations, Separation roadmap

    Output: SLA for the purchasing organization

    Materials: Service Catalog Internal Service Level Agreement Template, M&A Separation Project Plan Tool (SharePoint), M&A Separation Project Plan Tool (Excel)

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Company M&A team, Purchasing company M&A team, Purchasing company IT leadership

    The purpose of this activity is to determine if the buyer has specific service expectations for your IT organization post-transaction that your IT organization is agreeing to provide.

    1. Document the expected services and the related details in a service-level agreement.
    2. Provide the SLA to the purchasing organization.
    3. Obtain sign-off from both organizations on the level of service that is expected of IT.
    4. Update the M&A Separation Project Management Tool Excel or SharePoint document to reflect any additional items that the purchasing organization identified.

    *For organizations being purchased in their entirety, this activity may not be relevant.

    Modify the Service Catalog Internal Service Level Agreement with the agreed-upon terms of the SLA.

    Importance of estimating separation costs

    Change is the key driver of separation costs

    Separation costs are dependent on the following:
    • Meeting synergy targets – whether that be cost saving or growth related.
      • Employee-related costs, licensing, and reconfiguration fees play a huge part in meeting synergy targets.
    • Adjustments related to compliance or regulations – especially if there are changes to legal entities, reporting requirements, or risk mitigation standards.
    • Governance or third party–related support required to ensure timelines are met and the separation is a success.
    Separation costs vary by industry type.
    • Certain industries may have separation costs made up of mostly one type, differing from other industries, due to the complexity and demands of the transaction. For example:
      • Healthcare separation costs are mostly driven by regulatory, safety, and quality standards, as well as consolidation of the research and development function.
      • Energy and Utilities tend to have the lowest separation costs due to most transactions occurring within the same sector rather than as cross-sector investments. For example, oil and gas transactions tend to be for oil fields and rigs (strategic fixed assets), which can easily be added to the buyer’s portfolio.

    Separation costs are more related to the degree of change required than the size of the transaction.

    3.2.6 Estimate separation costs

    3-4 hours

    Input: Separation tasks, Transition team, Valuation of current IT environment, Valuation of target IT environment, Outputs from data room, Technical debt, Employees

    Output: List of anticipated costs required to support IT separation

    Materials: Separation task checklist, Separation roadmap, M&A Sell Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Company M&A team, Transition team

    The purpose of this activity is to estimate the costs that will be associated with the separation. Identify and communicate a realistic figure to the larger M&A team within your company as early in the process as possible. This ensures that the funding required for the transaction is secured and budgeted for in the overarching transaction.

    1. On the associated slide in the M&A Sell Playbook, input:
      • Task
      • Domain
      • Cost type
      • Total cost amount
      • Level of certainty around the cost
    2. Provide a copy of the estimated costs to the company’s M&A team. Also provide any additional information identified earlier to help them understand the importance of those costs.

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    Employee transition planning

    Considering employee impact will be a huge component to ensure successful separation

    • Meet With Leadership
    • Plan Individual and Department Redeployment
    • Plan Individual and Department Layoffs
    • Monitor and Manage Departmental Effectiveness
    • For employees, the transition could mean:
      • Changing from their current role to a new role to meet requirements and expectations throughout the transition.
      • Being laid off because the role they are currently occupying has been made redundant.
    • It is important to plan for what the M&A separation needs will be and what the IT operational needs will be.
    • A lack of foresight into this long-term plan could lead to undue costs and headaches trying to retain critical staff, rehiring positions that were already let go, and keeping redundant employees longer then necessary.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Being transparent throughout the process is critical. Do not hesitate to tell employees the likelihood that their job may be made redundant. This will ensure a high level of trust and credibility for those who remain with the organization after the transaction.

    3.2.7 Create an employee transition plan

    3-4 hours

    Input: IT strategy, IT organizational design

    Output: Employee transition plans

    Materials: M&A Sell Playbook, Whiteboard, Sticky notes, Markers

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Company M&A team, Transition team

    The purpose of this activity is to create a transition plan for employees.

    1. Transition planning can be done at specific individual levels or more broadly to reflect a single role. Consider these four items in the transition plan:
      • Understand the direction of the employee transitions.
      • Identify employees that will be involved in the transition (moved or laid off).
      • Prepare to meet with employees.
      • Meet with employees.
    2. For each employee that will be facing some sort of change in their regular role, permanent or temporary, create a transition plan.
    3. For additional information on transitioning employees, review the blueprint Streamline Your Workforce During a Pandemic.

    **Note that if someone’s future role is a layoff, then there is no need to record anything for skills needed or method for skill development.

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    3.2.8 Create functional workplans for employees

    3-4 hours

    Input: Prioritized separation tasks, Employee transition plan, Separation RACI, Costs for activities, Activity owners

    Output: Employee functional workplans

    Materials: M&A Sell Playbook, Learning and development tools

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, IT management team, Company M&A team, Transition team

    The purpose of this activity is to create a functional workplan for the different employees so that they know what their key role and responsibilities are once the transaction occurs.

    1. First complete the transition plan from the previous activity (3.2.7) and the separation roadmap. Have these documents ready to review throughout this process.
    2. Identify the employees who will be transitioning to a new role permanently or temporarily. Creating a functional workplan is especially important for these employees.
    3. Identify the skills these employees need to have to support the separation. Record this in the corresponding slide in the M&A Sell Playbook.
    4. For each employee, identify someone who will be a point of contact for them throughout the transition.

    It is recommended that each employee have a functional workplan. Leverage the IT managers to support this task.

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    Metrics for separation

    Valuation & Due Diligence

    • % Defects discovered in production
    • $ Cost per user for enterprise applications
    • % In-house-built applications vs. enterprise applications
    • % Owners identified for all data domains
    • # IT staff asked to participate in due diligence
    • Change to due diligence
    • IT budget variance
    • Synergy target

    Execution & Value Realization

    • % Satisfaction with the effectiveness of IT capabilities
    • % Overall end-customer satisfaction
    • $ Impact of vendor SLA breaches
    • $ Savings through cost-optimization efforts
    • $ Savings through application rationalization and technology standardization
    • # Key positions empty
    • % Frequency of staff turnover
    • % Emergency changes
    • # Hours of unplanned downtime
    • % Releases that cause downtime
    • % Incidents with identified problem record
    • % Problems with identified root cause
    • # Days from problem identification to root cause fix
    • % Projects that consider IT risk
    • % Incidents due to issues not addressed in the security plan
    • # Average vulnerability remediation time
    • % Application budget spent on new build/buy vs. maintenance (deferred feature implementation, enhancements, bug fixes)
    • # Time (days) to value realization
    • % Projects that realized planned benefits
    • $ IT operational savings and cost reductions that are related to synergies/divestitures
    • % IT staff–related expenses/redundancies
    • # Days spent on IT separation
    • $ Accurate IT budget estimates
    • % Revenue growth directly tied to IT delivery
    • % Profit margin growth

    3.2.9 Align project metrics with identified tasks

    3-4 hours

    Input: Prioritized separation tasks, Employee transition plan, Separation RACI, Costs for activities, Activity owners, M&A goals

    Output: Separation-specific metrics to measure success

    Materials: Separation roadmap, M&A Sell Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Transition team

    The purpose of this activity is to understand how to measure the success of the separation project by aligning metrics to each identified task.

    1. Review the M&A goals identified by the business. Your metrics will need to tie back to those business goals.
    2. Identify metrics that align to identified tasks and measure achievement of those goals. For each metric you consider, ask the following questions:
      • What is the main goal or objective that this metric is trying to solve?
      • What does success look like?
      • Does the metric promote the right behavior?
      • Is the metric actionable? What is the story you are trying to tell with this metric?
      • How often will this get measured?
      • Are there any metrics it supports or is supported by?

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    By the end of this mid-transaction phase you should:

    Have successfully evaluated your IT people, processes, and technology to determine a roadmap forward for separating or selling.

    Key outcomes from the Due Diligence & Preparation phase
    • Participate in due diligence activities to comply with regulatory and auditing standards and prepare employees for the transition.
    • Create a separation roadmap that considers the tasks that will need to be completed and the resources required to support separation.
    Key deliverables from the Due Diligence & Preparation phase
    • Drive value with a due diligence charter
    • Gather data room artifacts
    • Measure staff engagement
    • Assess culture
    • Create a carve-out roadmap
    • Prioritize separation tasks
    • Establish the separation roadmap
    • Identify the buyer’s IT expectations
    • Create a service/transaction agreement
    • Estimate separation costs
    • Create an employee transition plan
    • Create functional workplans for employees
    • Align project metrics with identified tasks

    M&A Sell Blueprint

    Phase 4

    Execution & Value Realization

    Phase 1Phase 2Phase 3

    Phase 4

    • 1.1 Identify Stakeholders and Their Perspective of IT
    • 1.2 Assess IT’s Current Value and Future State
    • 1.3 Drive Innovation and Suggest Reduction Opportunities
    • 2.1 Establish the M&A Program Plan
    • 2.2 Prepare IT to Engage in the Separation or Sale
    • 3.1 Engage in Due Diligence and Prepare Staff
    • 3.2 Prepare to Separate
    • 4.1 Execute the Transaction
    • 4.2 Reflection and Value Realization

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Monitor service agreements
    • Continually update the project plan
    • Confirm separation costs
    • Review IT’s transaction value
    • Conduct a transaction and separation SWOT
    • Review the playbook and prepare for future transactions

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • IT executive/CIO
    • IT senior leadership
    • Vendor management team
    • IT transaction team
    • Company M&A team

    Workshop Overview

    Contact your account representative for more information.
    workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8889

    Pre-Work

    Day 1

    Day 2

    Day 3

    Engage in Separation

    Day 4

    Establish the Transaction FoundationDiscover the Motivation for IntegrationPlan the Separation RoadmapPrepare Employees for the TransitionEngage in SeparationAssess the Transaction Outcomes (Must be within 30 days of transaction date)

    Activities

    • 0.1 Identify the rationale for the company's decision to pursue a divestiture/sale.
    • 0.2 Identify key stakeholders and determine the IT transaction team.
    • 0.3 Gather and evaluate the M&A strategy, future-state operating model, and governance.
    • 1.1 Review the business rationale for the divestiture/sale.
    • 1.2 Identify pain points and opportunities tied to the divestiture/sale.
    • 1.3 Establish the separation strategy.
    • 1.4 Create the due diligence charter.
    • 2.1 Prioritize separation tasks.
    • 2.2 Establish the separation roadmap.
    • 2.3 Establish and align project metrics with identified tasks.
    • 2.4 Estimate separation costs.
    • 3.1 Measure staff engagement
    • 3.2 Assess the current culture and identify the goal culture.
    • 3.3 Create an employee transition plan.
    • 3.4 Create functional workplans for employees.
    • S.1 Complete the separation by regularly updating the project plan.
    • S.2 Assess the service/technical transaction agreement.
    • 4.1 Confirm separation costs.
    • 4.2 Review IT’s transaction value.
    • 4.3 Conduct a transaction and separation SWOT.
    • 4.4 Review the playbook and prepare for future transactions.

    Deliverables

    1. IT strategy
    2. IT operating model
    3. IT governance structure
    4. M&A transaction team
    1. Business context implications for IT
    2. Separation strategy
    3. Due diligence charter
    1. Separation roadmap and associated resourcing
    1. Engagement assessment
    2. Culture assessment
    3. Employee transition plans and workplans
    1. Evaluate service/technical transaction agreement
    2. Updated separation project plan
    1. SWOT of transaction
    2. M&A Sell Playbook refined for future transactions

    What is the Execution & Value Realization phase?

    Post-transaction state

    Once the transaction comes to a close, it’s time for IT to deliver on the critical separation tasks. As the selling organization in this transaction, you need to ensure you have a roadmap that properly enables the ongoing delivery of your IT environment while simultaneously delivering the necessary services to the purchasing organization.

    Throughout the separation transaction, some of the most common obstacles IT should prepare for include difficulty separating the IT environment, loss of key personnel, disengaged employees, and security/compliance issues.

    Post-transaction, the business needs to understands the value they received by engaging in the transaction and the ongoing revenue they might obtain as a result of the sale. You also need to ensure that the IT environment is functioning and mitigating any high-risk outcomes.

    Goal: To carry out the planned separation activities and deliver the intended value to the business.

    Execution Prerequisite Checklist

    Before coming into the Execution & Value Realization phase, you must have addressed the following:

    • Understand the rationale for the company's decisions to pursue a sale or divestiture and what opportunities or pain points the sale should alleviate.
    • Identify the key roles for the transaction team.
    • Identify the M&A governance.
    • Determine target metrics.
    • Select a separation strategy framework.
    • Conduct a RACI for key transaction tasks for the transaction team.
    • Create a carve-out roadmap.
    • Prioritize separation tasks.
    • Establish the separation roadmap.
    • Create employee transition plans.

    Before coming into the Execution & Value Realization phase, we recommend addressing the following:

    • Create vision and mission statements.
    • Establish guiding principles.
    • Create a future-state operating model.
    • Identify the M&A operating model.
    • Document the communication plan.
    • Examine the business perspective of IT.
    • Identify key stakeholders and outline their relationship to the M&A process.
    • Establish a due diligence charter.
    • Be able to valuate the IT environment and communicate IT’s value to the business.
    • Gather and present due diligence data room artifacts.
    • Measure staff engagement.
    • Assess and plan for culture.
    • Estimate separation costs.
    • Create functional workplans for employees.
    • Identify the buyer’s IT expectations.
    • Create a service/ transaction agreement.

    Separation checklists

    Prerequisite Checklist
    • Build the project plan for separation and prioritize activities
      • Plan first day
      • Plan first 30/100 days
      • Plan first year
    • Create an organization-aligned IT strategy
    • Identify critical stakeholders
    • Create a communication strategy
    • Understand the rationale for the sale or divestiture
    • Develop IT's sale/divestiture strategy
      • Determine goal opportunities
      • Create the mission and vision statements
      • Create the guiding principles
      • Create program metrics
    • Consolidate reports from due diligence/data room
    • Conduct culture assessment
    • Create a transaction team
    • Establish a service/technical transaction agreement
    • Plan and communicate culture changes
    • Create an employee transition plan
    • Assess baseline engagement
    Business
    • Design an enterprise architecture
    • Document your business architecture
    • Meet compliance and regulatory standards
    • Identify and assess all of IT's risks
    Applications
    • Prioritize and address critical applications
      • CRM
      • HRIS
      • Financial
      • Sales
      • Risk
      • Security
      • ERP
      • Email
    • Develop method of separating applications
    • Model critical applications that have dependencies on one another
    • Identify the infrastructure capacity required to support critical applications
    • Prioritize and address critical applications
    Leadership/IT Executive
    • Build an IT budget
    • Structure operating budget
    • Structure capital budget
    • Identify the workforce demand vs. capacity
    • Establish and monitor key metrics
    • Communicate value realized/cost savings
    Data
    • Confirm data strategy
    • Confirm data governance
    • Build a data architecture roadmap
    • Analyze data sources and domains
    • Evaluate data storage (on-premises vs. cloud)
    • Develop an enterprise content management strategy and roadmap
    • Ensure cleanliness/usability of data sets
    • Identify data sets that can remain operational if reduced/separated
    • Develop reporting and analytics capabilities
    • Confirm data strategy
    Operations
    • Manage sales access to customer data
    • Determine locations and hours of operation
    • Separate/terminate phone lists and extensions
    • Split email address books
    • Communicate helpdesk/service desk information

    Separation checklists (continued)

    Infrastructure
    • Manage organization domains
    • Consolidate data centers
    • Compile inventory of vendors, versions, switches, and routers
    • Review hardware lease or purchase agreements
    • Review outsourcing/service provider agreements
    • Review service-level agreements
    • Assess connectivity linkages between locations
    • Plan to migrate to a single email system if necessary
    • Determine network access concerns
    Vendors
    • Establish a sustainable vendor management office
    • Review vendor landscape
    • Identify warranty options
    • Identify the licensing grant
    • Rationalize vendor services and solutions
    People
    • Design an IT operating model
    • Design your future IT organizational structure
    • Conduct a RACI for prioritized activities
    • Conduct a culture assessment and identify goal IT culture
    • Build an IT employee engagement program
    • Determine critical roles and systems/process/products they support
    • Define new job descriptions with meaningful roles and responsibilities
    • Create employee transition plans
    • Create functional workplans
    Projects
    • Identify projects to be on hold
    • Communicate project intake process
    • Reprioritize projects
    Products & Services
    • Redefine service catalog
    • Ensure customer interaction requirements are met
    • Select a solution for product lifecycle management
    • Plan service-level agreements
    Security
    • Conduct a security assessment
    • Develop accessibility prioritization and schedule
    • Establish an information security strategy
    • Develop a security awareness and training program
    • Develop and manage security governance, risk, and compliance
    • Identify security budget
    • Build a data privacy and classification program
    IT Processes
    • Evaluate current process models
    • Determine productivity/capacity levels of processes
    • Identify processes to be changed/terminated
    • Establish a communication plan
    • Develop a change management process
    • Establish/review IT policies
    • Evaluate current process models

    Execution & Value Realization

    Step 4.1

    Execute the Transaction

    Activities

    • 4.1.1 Monitor service agreements
    • 4.1.2 Continually update the project plan

    This step will walk you through the following activities:

    • Monitor service agreements
    • Continually update the project plan

    This step involves the following participants:

    • IT executive/CIO
    • IT senior leadership
    • Vendor management team
    • IT transaction team
    • Company M&A team

    Outcomes of Step

    Successfully execute the separation of the IT environments and update the project plan, strategizing against any roadblocks as they come.

    Key concerns to monitor during separation

    If you are entering the transaction at this point, consider and monitor the following three items above all else.

    Your IT environment, reputation as an IT leader, and impact on key staff will depend on monitoring these aspects.

    • Risk & Security. Make sure that the channels of communication between the purchasing organization and your IT environment are properly determined and protected. This might include updating or removing employees’ access to certain programs.
    • Retaining Employees. Employees who do not see a path forward in the organization or who feel that their skills are being underused will be quick to move on. Make sure they are engaged before, during, and after the transaction to avoid losing employees.
    • IT Environment Dependencies. Testing the IT environment several times and obtaining sign-off from auditors that this has been completed correctly should be completed well before the transaction occurs. Have a strong architecture outlining technical dependencies.

    For more information, review:

    • Reduce and Manage Your Organization’s Insider Threat Risk
    • Map Technical Skills for a Changing Infrastructure Operations Organization
    • Build a Data Architecture Roadmap

    4.1.1 Monitor service agreements

    3-6 months

    Input: Original service agreement, Risk register

    Output: Service agreement confirmed

    Materials: Original service agreement

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, External organization IT senior leadership

    The purpose of this activity is to monitor the established service agreements on an ongoing basis. Your organization is most at risk during the initial months following the transaction.

    1. Ensure the right controls exist to prevent the organization from unnecessarily opening itself up to risks.
    2. Meet with the purchasing organization/subsidiary three months after the transaction to ensure that everyone is satisfied with the level of services provided.
    3. This is not a quick and completed activity, but one that requires ongoing monitoring. Repeatedly identify potential risks worth mitigating.

    For additional information and support for this activity, see the blueprint Build an IT Risk Management Program.

    4.1.2 Continually update the project plan

    Reoccurring basis following transition

    Input: Prioritized separation tasks, Separation RACI, Activity owners

    Output: Updated separation project plan

    Materials: M&A Separation Project Plan Tool (SharePoint), M&A Separation Project Plan Tool (Excel)

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, IT transaction team, Company M&A team

    The purpose of this activity is to ensure that the project plan is continuously updated as your transaction team continues to execute on the various components outlined in the project plan.

    1. Set a regular cadence for the transaction team to meet, update the project plan, review the status of the various separation task items, and strategize how to overcome any roadblocks.
    2. Employ governance best practices in these meetings to ensure decisions can be made effectively and resources allocated strategically.

    Record the updates in the M&A Separation Project Management Tool (SharePoint).

    Record the updates in the M&A Separation Project Management Tool (Excel).

    Execution & Value Realization

    Step 4.2

    Reflection and Value Realization

    Activities

    • 4.2.1 Confirm separation costs
    • 4.2.2 Review IT’s transaction value
    • 4.2.3 Conduct a transaction and separation SWOT
    • 4.2.4 Review the playbook and prepare for future transactions

    This step involves the following participants:

    • IT executive/CIO
    • IT senior leadership
    • Transition team
    • Company M&A team

    Outcomes of Step

    Review the value that IT was able to generate around the transaction and strategize about how to improve future selling or separating transactions.

    4.2.1 Confirm separation costs

    3-4 hours

    Input: Separation tasks, Carve-out roadmap, Transition team, Previous RACI, Estimated separation costs

    Output: Actual separation costs

    Materials: M&A Sell Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Transaction team, Company M&A team

    The purpose of this activity is to confirm the associated costs around separation. While the separation costs would have been estimated previously, it’s important to confirm the costs that were associated with the separation in order to provide an accurate and up-to-date report to the company’s M&A team.

    1. Taking all the original items identified previously in activity 3.2.6, identify if there were changes in the estimated costs. This can be an increase or a decrease.
    2. Ensure that each cost has a justification for why the cost changed from the original estimation.

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    Track cost savings and revenue generation

    Throughout the transaction, the business would have communicated its goals, rationales, and expectations for the transaction. Sometimes this is done explicitly, and other times the information is implicit. Either way, IT needs to ensure that metrics have been defined and are measuring the intended value that the business expects. Ensure that the benefits realized to the organization are being communicated regularly and frequently.

    1. Define Metrics: Select metrics to track synergies through the separation.
      1. You can track value by looking at percentages of improvement in process-level metrics depending on the savings or revenue being pursued.
      2. For example, if the value being pursued is decreasing costs, metrics could range from capacity to output, highlighting that the output remains high despite smaller IT environments.
    2. Prioritize Value-Driving Initiatives: Estimate the cost and benefit of each initiative's implementation to compare the amount of business value to the cost. The benefits and costs should be illustrated at a high level. Estimating the exact dollar value of fulfilling a synergy can be difficult and misleading.
        Steps
      • Determine the benefits that each initiative is expected to deliver.
      • Determine the high-level costs of implementation (capacity, time, resources, effort).
    3. Track Cost Savings and Revenue Generation: Develop a detailed workplan to resource the roadmap and track where costs are saved and revenue is generated as the initiatives are undertaken.

    4.2.2 Review IT’s transaction value

    3-4 hours

    Input: Prioritized separation tasks, Separation RACI, Activity owners, M&A company goals

    Output: Transaction value

    Materials: M&A Sell Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Company's M&A team

    The purpose of this activity is to track how your IT organization performed against the originally identified metrics.

    1. If your organization did not have the opportunity to identify metrics, determine from the company M&A what those metrics might be. Review activity 3.2.9 for more information on metrics.
    2. Identify whether the metric (which should support a goal) was at, below, or above the original target metric. This is a very critical task for IT to complete because it allows IT to confirm that they were successful in the transaction and that the business can count on them in future transactions.
    3. Be sure to record accurate and relevant information on why the outcomes (good or bad) are supporting the M&A goals set out by the business.

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    4.2.3 Conduct a transaction and separation SWOT

    2 hours

    Input: Separation costs, Retention rates, Value that IT contributed to the transaction

    Output: Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats

    Materials: Flip charts, Markers, Sticky notes

    Participants: IT executive/CIO, IT senior leadership, Business transaction team

    The purpose of this activity is to assess the positive and negative elements of the transaction.

    1. Consider the internal and external elements that could have impacted the outcome of the transaction.
      • Strengths. Internal characteristics that are favorable as they relate to your development environment.
      • Weaknesses Internal characteristics that are unfavorable or need improvement.
      • Opportunities External characteristics that you may use to your advantage.
      • Threats External characteristics that may be potential sources of failure or risk.

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    M&A Sell Playbook review

    With an acquisition complete, your IT organization is now more prepared then ever to support the business through future M&As

    • Now that the transaction is more than 80% complete, take the opportunity to review the key elements that worked well and the opportunities for improvement.
    • Critically examine the M&A Sell Playbook your IT organization created and identify what worked well to help the transaction and where your organization could adjust to do better in future transactions.
    • If your organization were to engage in another sale or divestiture under your IT leadership, how would you go about the transaction to make sure the company meets its goals?

    4.2.4 Review the playbook and prepare for future transactions

    4 hours

    Input: Transaction and separation SWOT

    Output: Refined M&A playbook

    Materials: M&A Sell Playbook

    Participants: IT executive/CIO

    The purpose of this activity is to revise the playbook and ensure it is ready to go for future transactions.

    1. Using the outputs from the previous activity, 4.2.3, determine what strengths and opportunities there were that should be leveraged in the next transaction.
    2. Likewise, determine which threats and weaknesses could be avoided in the future transactions.
      Remember, this is your M&A Sell Playbook, and it should reflect the most successful outcome for you in your organization.

    Record the results in the M&A Sell Playbook.

    By the end of this post-transaction phase you should:

    Have completed the separation post-transaction and be fluidly delivering the critical value that the business expected of IT.

    Key outcomes from the Execution & Value Realization phase
    • Ensure the separation tasks are being completed and that any blockers related to the transaction are being removed.
    • Determine where IT was able to realize value for the business and demonstrate IT’s involvement in meeting target goals.
    Key deliverables from the Execution & Value Realization phase
    • Monitor service agreements
    • Continually update the project plan
    • Confirm separation costs
    • Review IT’s transaction value
    • Conduct a transaction and separation SWOT
    • Review the playbook and prepare for future transactions

    Summary of Accomplishment

    Problem Solved

    Congratulations, you have completed the M&A Sell Blueprint!

    Rather than reacting to a transaction, you have been proactive in tackling this initiative. You now have a process to fall back on in which you can be an innovative IT leader by suggesting how and why the business should engage in a separation or sale transaction. You have:

    • Created a standardized approach for how your IT organization should address divestitures or sales.
    • Retained critical staff and complied with any regulations throughout the transaction.
    • Delivered on the separation project plan successfully and communicated IT’s transaction value to the business.

    Now that you have done all of this, reflect on what went well and what can be improved if you were to engage in a similar divestiture or sale again.

    If you would like additional support, have our analysts guide you through other phases as part of an Info-Tech workshop.

    Contact your account representative for more information
    workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8899

    Research Contributors and Experts

    Ibrahim Abdel-Kader
    Research Analyst | CIO
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Brittany Lutes
    Senior Research Analyst | CIO
    Info-Tech Research Group
    John Annand
    Principal Research Director | Infrastructure
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Scott Bickley
    Principal Research Director | Vendor Management
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Cole Cioran
    Practice Lead | Applications
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Dana Daher
    Research Analyst | Strategy & Innovation
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Eric Dolinar
    Manager | M&A Consulting
    Deloitte Canada
    Christoph Egel
    Director, Solution Design & Deliver
    Cooper Tire & Rubber Company
    Nora Fisher
    Vice President | Executive Services Advisory
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Larry Fretz
    Vice President | Industry
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Research Contributors and Experts

    David Glazer
    Vice President of Analytics
    Kroll
    Jack Hakimian
    Senior Vice President | Workshops and Delivery
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Gord Harrison
    Senior Vice President | Research & Advisory
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Valence Howden
    Principal Research Director | CIO
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Jennifer Jones
    Research Director | Industry
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Nancy McCuaig
    Senior Vice President | Chief Technology and Data Office
    IGM Financial Inc.
    Carlene McCubbin
    Practice Lead | CIO
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Kenneth McGee
    Research Fellow | Strategy & Innovation
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Nayma Naser
    Associate
    Deloitte
    Andy Neill
    Practice Lead | Data & Analytics, Enterprise Architecture
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Research Contributors and Experts

    Rick Pittman
    Vice President | Research
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Rocco Rao
    Research Director | Industry
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Mark Rosa
    Senior Vice President & Chief Information Officer
    Mohegan Gaming and Entertainment
    Tracy-Lynn Reid
    Research Lead | People & Leadership
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Jim Robson
    Senior Vice President | Shared Enterprise Services (retired)
    Great-West Life
    Steven Schmidt
    Senior Managing Partner Advisory | Executive Services
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Nikki Seventikidis
    Senior Manager | Finance Initiative & Continuous Improvement
    CST Consultants Inc.
    Allison Straker
    Research Director | CIO
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Justin Waelz
    Senior Network & Systems Administrator
    Info-Tech Research Group
    Sallie Wright
    Executive Counselor
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Bibliography

    “5 Ways for CIOs to Accelerate Value During Mergers and Acquisitions.” Okta, n.d. Web.

    Altintepe, Hakan. “Mergers and acquisitions speed up digital transformation.” CIO.com, 27 July 2018. Web.

    “America’s elite law firms are booming.” The Economist, 15 July 2021. Web.

    Barbaglia, Pamela, and Joshua Franklin. “Global M&A sets Q1 record as dealmakers shape post-COVID world.” Nasdaq, 1 April 2021. Web.

    Boyce, Paul. “Mergers and Acquisitions Definition: Types, Advantages, and Disadvantages.” BoyceWire, 8 Oct. 2020. Web.

    Bradt, George. “83% Of Mergers Fail -- Leverage A 100-Day Action Plan For Success Instead.” Forbes, 27 Jan. 2015. Web.

    Capgemini. “Mergers and Acquisitions: Get CIOs, IT Leaders Involved Early.” Channel e2e, 19 June 2020. Web.

    Chandra, Sumit, et al. “Make Or Break: The Critical Role Of IT In Post-Merger Integration.” IMAA Institute, 2016. Web.

    Deloitte. “How to Calculate Technical Debt.” The Wall Street Journal, 21 Jan. 2015. Web.

    Ernst & Young. “IT As A Driver Of M&A Success.” IMAA Institute, 2017. Web.

    Fernandes, Nuno. “M&As In 2021: How To Improve The Odds Of A Successful Deal.” Forbes, 23 March 2021. Web.

    “Five steps to a better 'technology fit' in mergers and acquisitions.” BCS, 7 Nov. 2019. Web.

    Fricke, Pierre. “The Biggest Opportunity You’re Missing During an M&Aamp; IT Integration.” Rackspace, 4 Nov. 2020. Web.

    Garrison, David W. “Most Mergers Fail Because People Aren't Boxes.” Forbes, 24 June 2019. Web.

    Harroch, Richard. “What You Need To Know About Mergers & Acquisitions: 12 Key Considerations When Selling Your Company.” Forbes, 27 Aug. 2018. Web.

    Hope, Michele. “M&A Integration: New Ways To Contain The IT Cost Of Mergers, Acquisitions And Migrations.” Iron Mountain, n.d. Web.

    “How Agile Project Management Principles Can Modernize M&A.” Business.com, 13 April 2020. Web.

    Hull, Patrick. “Answer 4 Questions to Get a Great Mission Statement.” Forbes, 10 Jan. 2013. Web.

    Kanter, Rosabeth Moss. “What We Can Learn About Unity from Hostile Takeovers.” Harvard Business Review, 12 Nov. 2020. Web.

    Koller, Tim, et al. “Valuation: Measuring and Managing the Value of Companies, 7th edition.” McKinsey & Company, 2020. Web.

    Labate, John. “M&A Alternatives Take Center Stage: Survey.” The Wall Street Journal, 30 Oct. 2020. Web.

    Lerner, Maya Ber. “How to Calculate ROI on Infrastructure Automation.” DevOps.com, 1 July 2020. Web.

    Loten, Angus. “Companies Without a Tech Plan in M&A Deals Face Higher IT Costs.” The Wall Street Journal, 18 June 2019. Web.

    Low, Jia Jen. “Tackling the tech integration challenge of mergers today” Tech HQ, 6 Jan. 2020. Web.

    Lucas, Suzanne. “5 Reasons Turnover Should Scare You.” Inc. 22 March 2013. Web.

    “M&A Trends Survey: The future of M&A. Deal trends in a changing world.” Deloitte, Oct. 2020. Web.

    Maheshwari, Adi, and Manish Dabas. “Six strategies tech companies are using for successful divesting.” EY, 1 Aug. 2020. Web.

    Majaski, Christina. “Mergers and Acquisitions: What's the Difference?” Investopedia, 30 Apr. 2021.

    “Mergers & Acquisitions: Top 5 Technology Considerations.” Teksetra, 21 Jul. 2020. Web.

    “Mergers Acquisitions M&A Process.” Corporate Finance Institute, n.d. Web.

    “Mergers and acquisitions: A means to gain technology and expertise.” DLA Piper, 2020. Web.

    Nash, Kim S. “CIOs Take Larger Role in Pre-IPO Prep Work.” The Wall Street Journal, 5 March 2015. Web.

    O'Connell, Sean, et al. “Divestitures: How to Invest for Success.” McKinsey, 1 Aug. 2015. Web

    Paszti, Laila. “Canada: Emerging Trends In Information Technology (IT) Mergers And Acquisitions.” Mondaq, 24 Oct. 2019. Web.

    Patel, Kiison. “The 8 Biggest M&A Failures of All Time” Deal Room, 9 Sept. 2021. Web.

    Peek, Sean, and Paula Fernandes. “What Is a Vision Statement?” Business News Daily, 7 May 2020. Web.

    Ravid, Barak. “How divestments can re-energize the technology growth story.” EY, 14 July 2021. Web.

    Ravid, Barak. “Tech execs focus on growth amid increasingly competitive M&A market.” EY, 28 April 2021. Web.

    Resch, Scott. “5 Questions with a Mergers & Acquisitions Expert.” CIO, 25 June 2019. Web.

    Salsberg, Brian. “Four tips for estimating one-time M&A integration costs.” EY, 17 Oct. 2019. Web.

    Samuels, Mark. “Mergers and acquisitions: Five ways tech can smooth the way.” ZDNet, 15 Aug. 2018. Web.

    “SAP Divestiture Projects: Options, Approach and Challenges.” Cognizant, May, 2014. Web.

    Steeves, Dave. “7 Rules for Surviving a Merger & Acquisition Technology Integration.” Steeves and Associates, 5 Feb. 2020. Web.

    Tanaszi, Margaret. “Calculating IT Value in Business Terms.” CSO, 27 May 2004. Web.

    “The CIO Playbook. Nine Steps CIOs Must Take For Successful Divestitures.” SNP, 2016. Web.

    “The Role of IT in Supporting Mergers and Acquisitions.” Cognizant, Feb. 2015. Web.

    Torres, Roberto. “M&A playbook: How to prepare for the cost, staff and tech hurdles.” CIO Dive, 14 Nov. 2019. Web.

    “Valuation Methods.” Corporate Finance Institute, n.d. Web.

    Weller, Joe. “The Ultimate Guide to the M&A Process for Buyers and Sellers.” Smartsheet, 16 May 2019. Web.

    Tech Trend Update: If Biosecurity Then Autonomous Edge

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}99|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Innovation
    • Parent Category Link: /innovation

    COVID-19 has created new risks to physical encounters among workers and customers. New biosecurity processes and ways to effectively enforce them – in the least intrusive way possible – are required to resume these activities.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    New biosecurity standards will be imposed on many industries, and the autonomous edge will be part of the solution to manage that new reality.

    Impact and Result

    There are some key considerations for businesses considering new biosecurity measures:

    1. If prevention, then ID-based access control
    2. If intervention, then alerts based on data
    3. If investigation, then contact tracing

    Tech Trend Update: If Biosecurity Then Autonomous Edge Research & Tools

    Tech Trend Update: If Biosecurity Then Autonomous Edge

    Understand how new biosecurity requirements could affect your business and why AI at the edge could be part of the solution.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    • Tech Trend Update: If Biosecurity Then Autonomous Edge Storyboard
    [infographic]

    Cybersecurity in Healthcare 2024

    Healthcare cybersecurity is a major concern for healthcare organizations and patients alike. In 2024, the healthcare industry faces several cybersecurity challenges, including the growing threat of ransomware, the increasing use of mobile devices in healthcare, and the need to comply with new regulations.

    Continue reading

    Industry-Specific Digital Transformation

    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Innovation
    • Parent Category Link: /innovation

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    Infographic

    Capture and Market the ROI of Your VMO

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}212|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $108,234 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 9 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Vendor Management
    • Parent Category Link: /vendor-management
    • All IT organizations are dependent on their vendors for technology products, services, and solutions to support critical business functions.
    • Measuring the impact of and establishing goals for the vendor management office (VMO) to maximize its effectiveness requires an objective and quantitative approach whenever possible.
    • Sharing the VMO’s impact internally is a balancing act between demonstrating value and self-promotion.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • The return on investment (ROI) calculation for your VMO must be customized. The ROI components selected must match your VMO ROI maturity, resources, and roadmap. There is no one-size-fits-all approach to calculating VMO ROI.
    • ROI contributions come from many areas and sources. To maximize the VMO’s ROI, look outside the traditional framework of savings and cost avoidance to vendor-facing interactions and the impact the VMO has on internal departments.

    Impact and Result

    • Quantifying the contributions of the VMO takes the guess work out of whether the VMO is performing adequately.
    • Taking a comprehensive approach to measuring the value created by the VMO and the ROI associated with it will help the organization appreciate the importance of the VMO.
    • Establishing goals for the VMO with the help of the executives and key stakeholders ensures that the VMO is supporting the needs of the entire organization.

    Capture and Market the ROI of Your VMO Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should calculate and market internally your VMO’s ROI, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Get organized

    Begin the process by identifying your VMO’s ROI maturity level and which calculation components are most appropriate for your situation.

    • Capture and Market the ROI of the VMO – Phase 1: Get Organized
    • VMO ROI Maturity Assessment Tool
    • VMO ROI Calculator and Tracker
    • VMO ROI Data Source Inventory and Evaluation Tool
    • VMO ROI Summary Template

    2. Establish baseline

    Set measurement baselines and goals for the next measurement cycle.

    • Capture and Market the ROI of the VMO – Phase 2: Establish Baseline
    • VMO ROI Baseline and Goals Tool

    3. Measure and monitor results

    Measure the VMO's ROI and value created by the VMO’s efforts and the overall internal satisfaction with the VMO.

    • Capture and Market the ROI of the VMO – Phase 3: Measure and Monitor Results
    • RFP Cost Estimator
    • Improvements in Working Capital Estimator
    • Risk Estimator
    • General Process Cost Estimator and Delta Estimator
    • VMO Internal Client Satisfaction Survey
    • Vendor Security Questionnaire
    • Value Creation Worksheet
    • Deal Summary Report Template

    4. Report results

    Report the results to key stakeholders and executives in a way that demonstrates the value added by the VMO to the entire organization.

    • Capture and Market the ROI of the VMO – Phase 4: Report Results
    • Internal Business Review Agenda Template
    • IT Spend Analytics
    • VMO ROI Reporting Worksheet
    • VMO ROI Stakeholder Report Template
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Capture and Market the ROI of Your VMO

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Get Organized

    The Purpose

    Determine how you will measure the VMO’s ROI.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Focus your measurement on the appropriate activities.

    Activities

    1.1 Determine your VMO’s maturity level and identify applicable ROI measurement categories.

    1.2 Review and select the appropriate ROI formula components for each applicable measurement category.

    1.3 Compile a list of potential data sources, evaluate the viability of each data source selected, and assign data collection and analysis responsibilities.

    1.4 Communicate progress and proposed ROI formula components to executives and key stakeholders for feedback and/or approval/alignment.

    Outputs

    VMO ROI maturity level and first step of customizing the ROI formula components.

    Second and final step of customizing the ROI formula components…what will actually be measured.

    Viable data sources and assignments for team members.

    A progress report for key stakeholders and executives.

    2 Establish Baseline

    The Purpose

    Set baselines to measure created value against.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    ROI contributions cannot be objectively measured without baselines.

    Activities

    2.1 Gather baseline data.

    2.2 Calculate/set baselines.

    2.3 Set SMART goals.

    2.4 Communicate progress and proposed ROI formula components to executives and key stakeholders for feedback and/or approval/alignment.

    Outputs

    Data to use for calculating baselines.

    Baselines for measuring ROI contributions.

    Value creation goals for the next measurement cycle.

    An updated progress report for key stakeholders and executives.

    3 Measure and Monitor Results

    The Purpose

    Calculate the VMO’s ROI.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    An understanding of whether the VMO is paying for itself.

    Activities

    3.1 Assemble the data and calculate the VMO’s ROI.

    3.2 Organize the data for the reporting step.

    Outputs

    The VMO’s ROI expressed in terms of how many times it pays for itself (e.g. 1X, 3X, 5X).

    Determine which supporting data will be reported.

    4 Report Results

    The Purpose

    Report results to stakeholders.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Stakeholders understand the value of the VMO.

    Activities

    4.1 Create a reporting template.

    4.2 Determine reporting frequency.

    4.3 Decide how the reports will be distributed or presented.

    4.4 Send out a draft report and update based on feedback.

    Outputs

    A template for reporting ROI and supporting data.

    A decision about quarterly or annual reports.

    A decision regarding email, video, and in-person presentation of the ROI reports.

    Final ROI reports.

    IT Operations Consulting

    Operations... make sure that the services and products you offer your clients are delivered in the most efficient way possible. IT Operations makes sure that the applications and infrastructure that your delivery depends on is solid.

    Gert Taeymans has over 20 years experience in directing the implementation and management of mission-critical services for businesses in high-volume international markets. Strong track record in risk management, crisis management including disaster recovery, service delivery and change & config management.

    Register to read more …

    Diagnose Brand Health to Improve Business Growth

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}564|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Marketing Solutions
    • Parent Category Link: /marketing-solutions
    • Low number and quality of leads generated, poor conversion rates, and declining customer retention and loyalty
    • Higher customer acquisition vs. marketing costs
    • Difficulties attracting and keeping talent, partners, and investors
    • Slow or low growth and devaluation of the brand due to low brand equity

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • The Brand: Intangible, yet a company’s most valuable asset.
    • Data-driven decisions for a strong brand.
    • Investing in brand-building efforts means investing in your success.

    Impact and Result

    • Increase brand awareness and equity.
    • Build trust and improve customer retention and loyalty.
    • Achieve higher and faster growth.

    Diagnose Brand Health to Improve Business Growth Research & Tools

    Diagnose Brand Health to Improve Business Growth Executive Brief – A deck to help diagnose brand health to improve business growth.

    In this executive brief, you will discover the importance of a strong brand on the valuation, growth, and sustainability of your company. You will also learn about SoftwareReviews' approach to assessing current performance and gaining visibility into areas of improvement.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Brand Diagnostic and Analysis Tool Kit

    A comprehensive set of tools to gather and interpret qualitative and quantitative brand performance metrics.

    • Brand Diagnostic Tool - Digital Metrics Analysis Template
    • Brand Diagnostic Tool - Financial Metrics Analysis Template
    • Brand Diagnostic Tool Survey and Interview Questionnaires and Lists Template
    • Survey Emails Best Practices Guidelines
    • Brand Diagnostic Tool - External and Internal Factors Metrics Analysis Template

    2. Brand Diagnostic Executive Presentation

    Fully customizable, pre-built PowerPoint presentation template to communicate the results of the brand performance diagnostic, areas of improvement and trends, as well as your recommendations. It will also allow you to identify and align executive members and key stakeholders on next steps, and set priorities.

    • Brand Diagnostic - Executive Presentation Template

    Infographic

    Further reading

    Diagnose Brand Health to Improve Business Growth

    Have a significant and well-targeted impact on business success and growth by knowing how your brand performs, identifying areas of improvement, and making data-driven decisions to fix it.

    EXECUTIVE BRIEF

    SoftwareReviews is a division of Info-Tech Research Group Inc., a world-class IT research and consulting firm established in 1997.
    Backed by two decades of IT research and advisory experience, SoftwareReviews offers the most comprehensive insight into the enterprise software landscape and client-vendor relationships.

    Analyst Perspective

    Brand Diagnostic and Monitoring

    In the ever-changing market landscape in which businesses operate, it is imperative to ensure that the brand stays top of mind and quickly adapts. Having a good understanding of where the brand stands and how it performs has become crucial for any company to stand out from its competitors and succeed in a crowded and very dynamic market.

    Unfortunately, the brand does not always receive the attention and importance it deserves, leaving it vulnerable to becoming outdated and unclear to the target audience and to losing its equity.

    Knowing how the brand is perceived, as opposed to how individuals within an organization perceive it, addressing any brand-related issues in a timely manner, and implementing processes to continuously monitor its performance have become key tactics for any company that wants to thrive in today's highly competitive market.

    Photo of Nathalie Vezina, Marketing Research Director, SoftwareReviews Advisory.

    Nathalie Vezina
    Marketing Research Director
    SoftwareReviews Advisory

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    Because it is vulnerable to becoming outdated and unclear to the target audience and to losing its equity, it is essential to ensure that the brand is performing well and to be attentive to these signs of a weakened brand:

    • Low number and quality of leads generated, poor conversion rates, and declining customer retention and loyalty
    • Lack of understanding of the value proposition; lack of interest and interaction with the brand
    • Higher customer acquisition/marketing costs
    • Difficulties attracting and keeping talent, partners, or future investors
    • Low/slow growth; devaluation of the brand due to low brand equity
    Common Obstacles

    Building a strong brand is an everyday challenge, and brand leaders often face what may seem like overwhelming obstacles in achieving their goal. Here are some of the roadblocks they regularly face:

    • Limited visibility on brand perception and overall performance
    • Insufficient supporting information to make clear, undisputable data-driven decisions and convince key stakeholders how to improve brand performance
    • Limited resources (time, budget, headcount, tools) to diagnose, measure, and execute
    • Stakeholders may not be fully aware of the benefits of a strong brand and the impacts that a weak brand can have on the overall performance of the business
    SoftwareReviews’ Approach

    This SoftwareReviews blueprint provides the guidance and tools required to perform a thorough brand diagnostic and enable brand leaders to:

    • Know how the brand performs; pinpoint gaps and areas for improvement
    • Make clear, data-driven recommendations and decisions on how to fix and optimize the brand
    • Communicate, convince key stakeholders, and align on proposed solutions to optimize the brand’s performance
    • Continuously monitor and optimize the brand

    SoftwareReviews Advisory Insight

    The brand is a company’s most valuable asset that should never fall into disrepair. In fact, business leaders should ensure that at least half of their marketing budget is allocated to brand-building efforts.

    What is a brand?

    The brand – both intangible and the most valuable asset for businesses.

    Despite its intangible nature, the brand is at the heart of every business, small and large, around which rotates what drives business success and growth.

    While measuring its real value on the marketplace can be difficult, a brand with high salience will attract and retain customers for as long as it keeps evolving and adapting to its dynamic environment.

    Up to 90% of the total market value of companies is based on intangible assets, such as brand recognition. (Source: Ocean Tomo, 2020)

    Multiple bubbles with the biggest bubble highlighted and labelled 'BRAND'. The other bubbles say 'IDENTITY', 'LOYALTY', 'TRUST', 'STRATEGY', 'GROWTH', 'AWARENESS', and 'VALUE'.

    What makes a brand strong?

    Perception Matters

    The brand reflects the image of a company or a product. The values it conveys and how it’s being perceived have a direct impact on a brand's ability to stand out and grow.

    A brand is strong when it:

    • Projects a positive image
    • Has a clear positioning and value proposition
    • Is authentic and inspiring
    • Conveys values that resonates
    • Is socially engaged
    • Builds awareness
    • Is consistent
    • Delivers on its promise
    • Inspires trust
    “In the past, a brand is what a company told you it was. Today, a brand is what people tell each other it is.” (Source: Mark Schaefer, 2019)

    Investing in building a brand, a top priority for businesses

    Company Valuation

    Branding has become a top priority for companies to increase the value of their business in the marketplace. A good market value is essential to attract and retain investors, obtain future rounds of financing, grow by acquisition, and find buyers.

    The more equity a brand gains, the higher its market value, despite the company’s annual revenue. While annual revenue is factored in the equation, the equity of the brand has a greater impact on the market value. A brand whose market value is lower than its revenue is an important indicator that the brand is weakened and needs to be addressed.

    Revenue and Growth

    Most successful companies are investing heavily in building their brand, and for good reason. A strong brand will deliver the right messaging, and a unique and clear value proposition will resonate with its audience and directly impact customer acquisition costs, outperform competition, enable higher pricing, and increase sales volume and customer lifetime value.

    A strong brand also helps develop partner channels, attract and engage high-value partners, and allow for actionable and incremental KPIs.

    Talent Acquisition and Retention

    Brands with strong values are more attractive to highly skilled talent without having to offer above-market salaries. In addition, when a brand inspires pride and shares common values with employees, it increases their motivation and the company’s retention rate.

    Retaining employees within the company allows for the development of talent and retention of knowledge within the organization, thus contributing to the sustainability of the organization.

    It's no wonder that employer branding has become an essential element of human resources strategies.

    “Sustainable Living Brands are growing 69% faster than the rest of the business and delivering 75% of the company’s growth.” (Source: Unilever, 2019, qtd. in Deloitte, 2021)

    Symptoms of a weakened brand

    Know if your brand is suffering and needs to be fixed.

    Brand leaders experiencing one or more of these brand-related symptoms should consider rebranding or optimizing their brand:
    • Low number and quality of leads generated, poor conversion rates, and declining customer retention and loyalty
    • Higher customer acquisition vs. marketing costs
    • Difficulties attracting and keeping talent, partners, and investors
    • Slow or low growth and devaluation of the brand due to low brand equity

    With visibility into your brand and the supporting data that provides a thorough diagnostic of the brand, combined with ongoing brand performance monitoring, you will have all the information you need to help you drive the brand forward, have a significant impact on business growth, and stand out as a brand leader.

    The largest software companies have an average market cap of 18X their revenue (Source: Companies Market Cap, May 2022)

    Building a strong brand, an everyday challenge

    Brand leaders are often faced with overwhelming obstacles in building a strong brand.

    Limited visibility on brand perception and overall performance Insufficient information to make clear, undisputable data-driven decisions and convince key stakeholders how to improve brand performance Stock image of a person pulling a boulder.
    Misunderstanding of the benefits of a strong brand and negative impacts of a weak brand on business valuation and growth Limited resources (time, budget, headcount, tools) to diagnose, measure, and execute
    Only
    54%
    of businesses have a B2B brand program in place for measuring brand perceptions. (Source: B2B International, 2016) Only
    4%
    of B2B marketing teams measure the impact of their marketing/brand building efforts beyond six months. (Source: LinkedIn’s B2B Institute, 2019) 50%
    of marketing budget is what successful brands spend on average on brand-building efforts. (Source: Les Binet and Peter Field, 2018)
    82% of investors say name recognition is an important factor guiding them in their investment decisions. (Source: Global Banking & Finance Review, 2018) 77% of B2B marketers say branding is crucial for growth. (Source: Circle Research)

    Making brand performance visible

    Implement data-driven strategies and make fact-based decisions to continuously optimize brand performance.

    Diagnose your brand’s health
    Know how your brand is being perceived and have visibility on its performance.
    Cycle titled 'BRAND' with steps 'Diagnose', 'Identify', 'Fix', 'Keep Monitoring' and back to 'Diagnose'. Identify trends and areas of improvement
    Rely on undisputable and reliable data to make clear decisions and educate and communicate with key stakeholders.
    Keep monitoring your brand’s performance
    Stay on top of the game and keep away competitors by continuously monitoring your brand’s health.
    Fix issues with your brand in a timely manner
    Don’t lose the momentum. Achieve better results and have a greater impact on your success and chances to grow.

    Qualitative and quantitative brand performance measures

    Segmented by SoftwareReviews Advisory into three categories for a comprehensive diagnostic.

    Icon of a megaphone. Icon of a head with puzzle pieces. Icon of coins.
    Brand Equity
    • Awareness
    • Perception
    • Positioning
    • Recognition/recall
    • Trust
    Buyer’s Behavior
    • Interaction with the brand
    • Preference
    • Purchase intent
    • Product reviews
    • Social engagement
    • Website traffic
    • Lead generation
    Financial
    • Revenue
    • Profit margin
    • Customer lifetime value (CLV)
    • Customer acquisition cost (CAC)
    • Intangible asset market value (IAMV)

    Benefits of a strong and healthy brand

    A healthy brand is the foundation of your success.

    Ensure a better understanding of the value proposition and positioning Drive more interest, interaction, and traction Increase brand awareness and equity Generate higher number and quality of leads
    Achieve higher and faster conversion rate Build trust and improve customer retention and loyalty Attract and keep talent, partners, and investors Achieve higher and faster growth

    Visual explaining the brand diagnostic methodology: 1. data collection and analysis; and 2. presentation and alignment. Outcomes: gain visibility into the brand's performance, highlight areas for improvement, and make data-driven decisions.

    Who benefits from diagnosing the brand?

    This Research Is Designed for:

    Brand leaders who are looking to:

    • Detect and monitor brand performance, issues, trends, and areas of improvement
    • Optimize and fix their brand
    • Develop strategies, and make recommendations and decisions based on facts
    • Get the support they need from key stakeholders
    This Research Will Help You:
    • Get the visibility you need on your brand’s performance
    • Pinpoint brand issues, trends, and areas of improvement
    • Develop data-driven strategies, and make recommendations and decisions based on facts
    • Communicate with and convince key stakeholders
    • Get the support you need from key stakeholders
    • Put in place new diagnostic and monitoring processes to continually improve your brand
    This Research Will Also Assist:
    • Sales with qualified lead generation and customer retention and loyalty
    • Human Resources in their efforts to attract and retain talent
    • The overall business with growth and increased market value
    This Research Will Help Them:
    • Have a better understanding of the importance of a strong brand on business growth and valuation
    • Align on next steps

    SoftwareReviews’ Brand Diagnostic Methodology

    0. Communication & Alignment 1. Data Collection 2. Data Analysis & Interpretation 3. Report & Presentation
    Phase Steps
    1. Engage and unify the team
    2. Communicate and present
    3. Align on next steps
    1. Identify and document internal and external changes affecting the brand
    2. Conduct internal and external brand perception surveys
    3. Gather customer loyalty feedback
    4. Collect digital performance metrics
    1. Analyze data collected
    2. Identify issues, trends, gaps, and inconsistencies
    3. Compare data with current brand statement
    1. Build report with recommendations
    2. Prioritize brand fixes from high to low positive impact
    3. Build presentation
    Phase Outcomes
    • Importance of the brand is recognized
    • Endorsement and prioritization
    • Support and resources
    • All relevant data/information is collected in one place
    • Visibility on the performance of the brand
    • All the data in hand to support recommendations and make informed decisions
    • Visibility and clear understanding of the brand’s health and how to fix or improve its performance

    Insight summary

    The Brand: Intangible, yet a company’s most valuable asset

    Intangible assets, such as brand recognition, account for almost all of a company’s value.1 Despite its intangible nature, the brand is at the heart of every business and has a direct impact on business growth, profitability, and revenue. While measuring its real value on the marketplace can be difficult, a brand with high traction will attract customers and keep them for as long as it keeps evolving and adapting to its dynamic environment.

    Making brand issues visible

    Having a clear understanding of how the brand performs has become crucial for any company that wants to stand out from its competitors and succeed in a crowded and highly dynamic marketplace.

    Data-driven decisions for a strong brand

    Intuition-based or uninformed decisions are obsolete. Brand leaders must base their decisions on facts to be able to convince key stakeholders.

    Building a strong brand, an everyday challenge

    Brand leaders often face overwhelming obstacles building strong brands. They need guidance and tools to support them to drive the business forward.

    Get team buy-in and alignment

    Brand leaders must ensure that the key stakeholders are aware of the importance of a strong brand to business growth and value increase and that they are aligned and committed to the efforts required to build a successful brand.

    Investing in brand-building efforts means investing in your success

    Successful business leaders allocate at least half of their marketing budget2 to brand-building efforts, enabling them to set themselves apart, significantly increase their market share, grow their business, and thrive in a highly competitive marketplace.

    Guided Implementation

    A Guided Implementation (GI) is a series of calls with a SoftwareReviews Marketing Analyst to help implement our best practices in your organization.

    Your engagement managers will work with you to schedule analyst calls.

    What does a typical GI on this topic look like?

    Brand Diagnostic

    Data Analysis & Interpretation

    Report & Presentation Building

    Communication & Alignment

    Call #1: Discuss concept and benefits of performing a brand diagnostic. Identify key stakeholders. Anticipate concerns and objections.

    Call #2: Discuss how to use the tool. Identify resources and internal support needed.

    Call #3: Review results. Discuss how to identify brand issues, areas of improvement, and trends based on data collected and to interpret key metrics.

    Call #4 (optional): Continue discussion from call #3.

    Call #5: Discuss recommendations and best practices to fix the issues identified and resources required.

    Call #6: Discuss purpose and how to build the report and presentation, Prioritize the brand fixes from high to low positive impact.

    Call #7 (optional): Follow up with call on report and presentation preparation.

    Call #8: Discuss key points to focus on when presenting to key stakeholders and the desired outcome.

    Call #9: Discuss how to leverage brand diagnostic tools now in place and the benefits of continuously monitoring the brand.

    Call #10: Debrief and determine how we can help with next steps.

    Key deliverable:

    Blueprint deliverables

    Each step of this blueprint is accompanied by supporting deliverables to help you accomplish your goals:

    Brand Diagnostic Presentation Template

    Sample of the key deliverable, the Brand Diagnostic Presentation Template.

    Pre-built and fully customizable PowerPoint template to communicate key findings, areas of improvements, and recommendations to key stakeholders, align on next steps, and prioritize.

    Brand Diagnostic Report Dashboard

    Sample of the Brand Diagnostic Report Dashboard deliverable.

    Auto-filling dashboard built into the Brand Diagnostic Tool Kit. Ready to be saved and shared as a PDF.

    Brand Diagnostic Tool Kit

    Sample of the Brand Diagnostic Tool Kit deliverable.

    Comprehensive Excel Workbook to gather and interpret brand performance metrics. Includes survey questionnaires.

    Bibliography

    “71% of Consumers More Likely to Buy a Product or Service From a Name They Recognise.” Global Banking & Finance Review, 5 December 2018. Web.

    B2B Marketing Leaders Report. Circle Research, n.d. Web.

    Binet, Les, and Peter Field. Effectiveness In Context: A manual for Brand Building. Institute of Practitioners in Advertising, 12 October 2018. Ebook.

    “Current Trends in the World of B2B Marketing, 2016 Survey.” B2B International, 2016. Web.

    Intangible Asset Market Value Study. Ocean Tomo, July 2020. Web.

    Largest Software Companies By Market Cap. Companies Market Cap, May 2022. Web.

    “Unilever, purpose-led brands outperform.” Unilever, 6 October 2019. Web. qtd. in Kounkel, Suzanne, Amy Silverstein, and Kathleen Peeters. “2021 Global Marketing Trends.” Deloitte Insights, 2020. Web.

    Schaefer, Mark. “The Future Of Branding Is Human Impressions.” Mark Schaefer Blog, 3 June 2019. Web.

    The 5 Principles Of Growth In B2B Marketing - Empirical Observations on B2B Effectiveness. LinkedIn B2B Institute, 2019. Web.

    Visual explaining the brand diagnostic methodology: 1. data collection and analysis; and 2. presentation and alignment. Outcomes: gain visibility into the brand's performance, highlight areas for improvement, and make data-driven decisions.

    Who benefits from diagnosing the brand?

    This Research Is Designed for:

    Brand leaders who are looking to:

    • Detect and monitor brand performance, issues, trends, and areas of improvement
    • Optimize and fix their brand
    • Develop strategies, and make recommendations and decisions based on facts
    • Get the support they need from key stakeholders
    This Research Will Help You:
    • Get the visibility you need on your brand’s performance
    • Pinpoint brand issues, trends, and areas of improvement
    • Develop data-driven strategies, and make recommendations and decisions based on facts
    • Communicate with and convince key stakeholders
    • Get the support you need from key stakeholders
    • Put in place new diagnostic and monitoring processes to continually improve your brand
    This Research Will Also Assist:
    • Sales with qualified lead generation and customer retention and loyalty
    • Human Resources in their efforts to attract and retain talent
    • The overall business with growth and increased market value
    This Research Will Help Them:
    • Have a better understanding of the importance of a strong brand on business growth and valuation
    • Align on next steps

    SoftwareReviews’ Brand Diagnostic Methodology

    0. Communication & Alignment 1. Data Collection 2. Data Analysis & Interpretation 3. Report & Presentation
    Phase Steps
    1. Engage and unify the team
    2. Communicate and present
    3. Align on next steps
    1. Identify and document internal and external changes affecting the brand
    2. Conduct internal and external brand perception surveys
    3. Gather customer loyalty feedback
    4. Collect digital performance metrics
    1. Analyze data collected
    2. Identify issues, trends, gaps, and inconsistencies
    3. Compare data with current brand statement
    1. Build report with recommendations
    2. Prioritize brand fixes from high to low positive impact
    3. Build presentation
    Phase Outcomes
    • Importance of the brand is recognized
    • Endorsement and prioritization
    • Support and resources
    • All relevant data/information is collected in one place
    • Visibility on the performance of the brand
    • All the data in hand to support recommendations and make informed decisions
    • Visibility and clear understanding of the brand’s health and how to fix or improve its performance

    Insight summary

    The Brand: Intangible, yet a company’s most valuable asset

    Intangible assets, such as brand recognition, account for almost all of a company’s value.1 Despite its intangible nature, the brand is at the heart of every business and has a direct impact on business growth, profitability, and revenue. While measuring its real value on the marketplace can be difficult, a brand with high traction will attract customers and keep them for as long as it keeps evolving and adapting to its dynamic environment.

    Making brand issues visible

    Having a clear understanding of how the brand performs has become crucial for any company that wants to stand out from its competitors and succeed in a crowded and highly dynamic marketplace.

    Data-driven decisions for a strong brand

    Intuition-based or uninformed decisions are obsolete. Brand leaders must base their decisions on facts to be able to convince key stakeholders.

    Building a strong brand, an everyday challenge

    Brand leaders often face overwhelming obstacles building strong brands. They need guidance and tools to support them to drive the business forward.

    Get team buy-in and alignment

    Brand leaders must ensure that the key stakeholders are aware of the importance of a strong brand to business growth and value increase and that they are aligned and committed to the efforts required to build a successful brand.

    Investing in brand-building efforts means investing in your success

    Successful business leaders allocate at least half of their marketing budget2 to brand-building efforts, enabling them to set themselves apart, significantly increase their market share, grow their business, and thrive in a highly competitive marketplace.

    Guided Implementation

    A Guided Implementation (GI) is a series of calls with a SoftwareReviews Marketing Analyst to help implement our best practices in your organization.

    Your engagement managers will work with you to schedule analyst calls.

    What does a typical GI on this topic look like?

    Brand Diagnostic

    Data Analysis & Interpretation

    Report & Presentation Building

    Communication & Alignment

    Call #1: Discuss concept and benefits of performing a brand diagnostic. Identify key stakeholders. Anticipate concerns and objections.

    Call #2: Discuss how to use the tool. Identify resources and internal support needed.

    Call #3: Review results. Discuss how to identify brand issues, areas of improvement, and trends based on data collected and to interpret key metrics.

    Call #4 (optional): Continue discussion from call #3.

    Call #5: Discuss recommendations and best practices to fix the issues identified and resources required.

    Call #6: Discuss purpose and how to build the report and presentation, Prioritize the brand fixes from high to low positive impact.

    Call #7 (optional): Follow up with call on report and presentation preparation.

    Call #8: Discuss key points to focus on when presenting to key stakeholders and the desired outcome.

    Call #9: Discuss how to leverage brand diagnostic tools now in place and the benefits of continuously monitoring the brand.

    Call #10: Debrief and determine how we can help with next steps.

    Key deliverable:

    Blueprint deliverables

    Each step of this blueprint is accompanied by supporting deliverables to help you accomplish your goals:

    Brand Diagnostic Presentation Template

    Sample of the key deliverable, the Brand Diagnostic Presentation Template.

    Pre-built and fully customizable PowerPoint template to communicate key findings, areas of improvements, and recommendations to key stakeholders, align on next steps, and prioritize.

    Brand Diagnostic Report Dashboard

    Sample of the Brand Diagnostic Report Dashboard deliverable.

    Auto-filling dashboard built into the Brand Diagnostic Tool Kit. Ready to be saved and shared as a PDF.

    Brand Diagnostic Tool Kit

    Sample of the Brand Diagnostic Tool Kit deliverable.

    Comprehensive Excel Workbook to gather and interpret brand performance metrics. Includes survey questionnaires.

    Bibliography

    “71% of Consumers More Likely to Buy a Product or Service From a Name They Recognise.” Global Banking & Finance Review, 5 December 2018. Web.

    B2B Marketing Leaders Report. Circle Research, n.d. Web.

    Binet, Les, and Peter Field. Effectiveness In Context: A manual for Brand Building. Institute of Practitioners in Advertising, 12 October 2018. Ebook.

    “Current Trends in the World of B2B Marketing, 2016 Survey.” B2B International, 2016. Web.

    Intangible Asset Market Value Study. Ocean Tomo, July 2020. Web.

    Largest Software Companies By Market Cap. Companies Market Cap, May 2022. Web.

    “Unilever, purpose-led brands outperform.” Unilever, 6 October 2019. Web. qtd. in Kounkel, Suzanne, Amy Silverstein, and Kathleen Peeters. “2021 Global Marketing Trends.” Deloitte Insights, 2020. Web.

    Schaefer, Mark. “The Future Of Branding Is Human Impressions.” Mark Schaefer Blog, 3 June 2019. Web.

    The 5 Principles Of Growth In B2B Marketing - Empirical Observations on B2B Effectiveness. LinkedIn B2B Institute, 2019. Web.

    Application Development Quality

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}26|cart{/j2store}
    • Related Products: {j2store}26|crosssells{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 10.0/10
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Applications
    • Parent Category Link: /applications
    Apply quality assurance across your critical development process steps to secure quality to product delivery

    Design and Build an Effective Contract Lifecycle Management Process

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}214|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $5,039 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 20 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Vendor Management
    • Parent Category Link: /vendor-management
    • Your vendor contracts are unorganized and held in various cabinets and network shares. There is no consolidated list or view of all the agreements, and some are misplaced or lost as coworkers leave.
    • The contract process takes a long time to complete. Coworkers are unsure who should be reviewing and approving them.
    • You are concerned that you are not getting favorable terms with your vendors and not complying with your agreement commitments.
    • You are unsure what risks your organization could be exposed to in your IT vendor contacts. These could be financial, legal, or security risks and/or compliance requirements.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Focus on what’s best for you. There are two phases to CLM. All stages within those phases are important, but choose to improve the phase that can be most beneficial to your organization in the short term. However, be sure to include reviewing risk and monitoring compliance.
    • Educate yourself. Understand the stages of CLM and how each step can rely on the previous one, like a stepping-stone model to success.
    • Consider the overall picture. Contract lifecycle management is the sum of many processes designed to manage contracts end to end while reducing corporate risk, improving financial savings, and managing agreement obligations. It can take time to get CLM organized and working efficiently, but then it will show its ROI and continuously improve.

    Impact and Result

    • Understand how to identify and mitigate risk to save the organization time and money.
    • Gain the knowledge required to implement a CLM that will be beneficial to all business units.
    • Achieve measurable savings in contract time processing, financial risk avoidance, and dollar savings.
    • Effectively review, store, manage, comply with, and renew agreements with a collaborative process

    Design and Build an Effective Contract Lifecycle Management Process Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out how a contract management system will save money and time and mitigate contract risk, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Master the operational framework of contract lifecycle management.

    Understand how the basic operational framework of CLM will ensure cost savings, improved collaboration, and constant CLM improvement.

    • Design and Build an Effective Contract Lifecycle Management Process – Phase 1: Master the Operational Framework of CLM
    • Existing CLM Process Worksheet
    • Contract Manager

    2. Understand the ten stages of contract lifecycle management.

    Understand the two phases of CLM and the ten stages that make up the entire process.

    • Design and Build an Effective Contract Lifecycle Management Process – Phase 2: Understand the Ten Stages of CLM
    • CLM Maturity Assessment Tool
    • CLM RASCI Diagram
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Design and Build an Effective Contract Lifecycle Management Process

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Review Your CLM Process and Learn the Basics

    The Purpose

    Identify current CLM processes.

    Learn the CLM operational framework.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Documented overview of current processes and stakeholders.

    Activities

    1.1 Review and capture your current process.

    1.2 Identify current stakeholders.

    1.3 Learn the operational framework of CLM.

    1.4 Identify current process gaps.

    Outputs

    Existing CLM Process Worksheet

    2 Learn More and Plan

    The Purpose

    Dive into the two phases of CLM and the ten stages of a robust system.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A deep understanding of the required components/stages of a CLM system.

    Activities

    2.1 Understand the two phases of CLM.

    2.2 Learn the ten stages of CLM.

    2.3 Assess your CLM maturity state.

    2.4 Identify and assign stakeholders.

    Outputs

    CLM Maturity Assessment

    CLM RASCI Diagram

    Further reading

    Design and Build an Effective Contract Lifecycle Management Process

    Mitigate risk and drive value through robust best practices for contract lifecycle management.

    Our understanding of the problem

    This Research Is Designed For:

    • The CIO who depends on numerous key vendors for services
    • The CIO or Project Manager who wants to maximize the value delivered by vendors
    • The Director or Manager of an existing IT procurement or vendor management team
    • The Contracts Manager or Legal Counsel whose IT department holds responsibility for contracts, negotiation, and administration

    This Research Will Help You:

    • Implement and streamline the contract management process, policies, and procedures
    • Baseline and benchmark existing contract processes
    • Understand the importance and value of contract lifecycle management (CLM)
    • Minimize risk, save time, and maximize savings with vendor contracts

    This Research Will Also Assist

    • IT Service Managers
    • IT Procurement
    • Contract teams
    • Finance and Legal departments
    • Senior IT leadership

    This Research Will Help Them

    • Understand the required components of a CLM
    • Establish the current CLM maturity level
    • Implement a new CLM process
    • Improve on an existing or disparate process

    ANALYST PERSPECTIVE

    "Contract lifecycle management (CLM) is a vital process for small and enterprise organizations alike. Research shows that all organizations can benefit from a contract management process, whether they have as few as 25 contracts or especially if they have contracts numbering in the hundreds.

    A CLM system will:

    • Save valuable time in the entire cycle of contract/agreement processes.
    • Save the organization money, both hard and soft dollars.
    • Mitigate risk to the organization.
    • Avoid loss of revenue.

    If you’re not managing your contracts, you aren’t capitalizing on your investment with your vendors and are potentially exposing your organization to contract and monetary risk."

    - Ted Walker
    Principal Research Advisor, Vendor Management Practice
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive Summary

    Situation

    • Most organizations have vendor overload and even worse, no defined process to manage the associated contracts and agreements. To manage contracts, some vendor management offices (VMOs) use a shared network drive to store the contracts and a spreadsheet to catalog and manage them. Yet other less-mature VMOs may just rely on a file cabinet in Procurement and a reminder in someone’s calendar about renewals. These disparate processes likely cost your organization time spent finding, managing, and renewing contracts, not to mention potential increases in vendor costs and risk and the inability to track contract obligations.

    Complication

    • Contract lifecycle management (CLM) is not an IT buzzword, and it’s rarely on the top-ten list of CIO concerns in most annual surveys. Until a VMO gets to a level of maturity that can fully develop a CLM and afford the time and costs of doing so, there can be several challenges to developing even the basic processes required to store, manage, and renew IT vendor contracts. As is always an issue in IT, budget is one of the biggest obstacles in implementing a standard CLM process. Until senior leadership realizes that a CLM process can save time, money, and risk, getting mindshare and funding commitment will remain a challenge.

    Resolution

    • Understand the immediate benefits of a CLM process – even a basic CLM implementation can provide significant cost savings to the organization; reduce time spent on creating, negotiating, and renewing contracts; and help identify and mitigate risks within your vendor contracts.
    • Budgets don’t always need to be a barrier to a standard CLM process. However, a robust CLM system can provide significant savings to the organization.

    Info-Tech Insight

    • If you aren’t managing your contracts, you aren’t capitalizing on your investments.
    • Even a basic CLM process with efficient procedures will provide savings and benefits.
    • Not having a CLM process may be costing your organization money, time, and exposure to unmitigated risk.

    What you can gain from this blueprint

    Why Create a CLM

    • Improved contract organization
    • Centralized and manageable storage/archives
    • Improved vendor compliance
    • Risk mitigation
    • Reduced potential loss of revenue

    Knowledge Gained

    • Understanding of the value and importance of a CLM
    • How CLM can impact many departments within the organization
    • Who should be involved in the CLM steps and processes
    • Why a CLM is important to your organization
    • How to save time and money by maximizing IT vendor contracts
    • How basic CLM policies and procedures can be implemented without costly software expenditure

    The Outcome

    • A foundation for a CLM with best-practice processes
    • Reduced exposure to potential risks within vendor contracts
    • Maximized savings with primary vendors
    • Vendor compliance and corporate governance
    • Collaboration, transparency, and integration with business units

    Contract management: A case study

    CASE STUDY
    Industry Finance and Banking
    Source Apttus

    FIS Global

    The Challenge

    FIS’ business groups were isolated across the organization and used different agreements, making contract creation a long, difficult, and manual process.

    • Customers frustrated by slow and complicated contracting process
    • Manual contract creation and approval processes
    • Sensitive contract data that lacked secure storage
    • Multiple agreements managed across divisions
    • Lack of central repository for past contracts
    • Inconsistent and inaccessible

    The Solution: Automating and Streamlining the Contract Management Process

    A robust CLM system solved FIS’ various contract management needs while also providing a solution that could expand into full quote-to cash in the future.

    • Contract lifecycle management (CLM)
    • Intelligent workflow approvals (IWA)
    • X-Author for Excel

    Customer Results

    • 75% cycle time reduction
    • $1M saved in admin costs per year
    • 49% increase in sales proposal volume
    • Automation on one standard platform and solution
    • 55% stronger compliance management
    • Easy maintenance for various templates
    • Ability to quickly absorb new contracts and processes via FIS’s ongoing acquisitions

    Track the impact of CLM with these metrics

    Dollars Saved

    Upfront dollars saved

    • Potential dollars saved from avoiding unfavorable terms and conditions
    • Incentives that encourage the vendor to act in the customer’s best interest
    • Secured commitments to provide specified products and services at firm prices
    • Cost savings related to audits, penalties, and back support
    • Savings from discounts found

    Time Saved

    Time saved, which can be done in several areas

    • Defined and automated approval flow process
    • Preapproved contract templates with corporate terms
    • Reduced negotiation times
    • Locate contracts in minutes

    Pitfalls Avoided

    Number of pitfalls found and avoided, such as

    • Auto-renewal
    • Inconsistencies between sections and documents
    • Security and data not being deleted upon termination
    • Improper licensing

    The numbers are compelling

    71%

    of companies can’t locate up to 10% of their contracts.

    Source: TechnologyAdvice, 2019

    9.2%

    of companies’ annual revenue is lost because of poor contract management practices.

    Source: IACCM, 2019

    60%

    still track contracts in shared drives or email folders.

    Source: “State of Contract Management,” SpringCM, 2018

    CLM blueprint objectives

    • To provide a best-practice process for managing IT vendor contract lifecycles through a framework that organizes from the core, analyzes each step in the cycle, has collaboration and governance attached to each step, and integrates with established vendor management practices within your organization.
    • CLM doesn’t have to be an expensive managed database system in the cloud with fancy dashboards. As long as you have a defined process that has the framework steps and is followed by the organization, this will provide basic CLM and save the organization time and money over a short period of time.
    • This blueprint will not delve into the many vendors or providers of CLM solutions and their methodologies. However, we will discuss briefly how to use our framework and contract stages in evaluating a potential solution that you may be considering.

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    "Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful.”

    Guided Implementation

    “Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track."

    Workshop

    "We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place."

    Consulting

    "Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project."

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

    Design and Build an Effective CLM Process – project overview

    1. Master the Operational Framework

    2. Understand the Ten Stages of CLM

    Best-Practice Toolkit

    1.1 Understand the operational framework components.

    1.2 Review your current framework.

    1.3 Create a plan to implement or enhance existing processes.

    2.1 Understand the ten stages of CLM.

    2.2 Review and document your current processes.

    2.3 Review RASCI chart and assign internal ownership.

    2.4 Create an improvement plan.

    2.5 Track changes for measurable ROI.

    Guided Implementations
    • Review existing processes.
    • Understand what CLM is and why the framework is essential.
    • Create an implementation or improvement plan.
    • Review the ten stages of CLM.
    • Complete CLM Maturity Assessment.
    • Create a plan to target improvement.
    • Track progress to measure savings.
    Onsite Workshop

    Module 1: Review and Learn the Basics

    • Review and capture your current processes.
    • Learn the basic operational framework of contract management.

    Module 2 Results:

    • Understand the ten stages of effective CLM.
    • Create an improvement or implementation plan.
    Phase 1 Outcome:
    • A full understanding of what makes a comprehensive contract management system.
    Phase 2 Outcome:
    • A full understanding of your current CLM processes and where to focus your efforts for improvement or implementation.

    Workshop overview

    Contact your account representative or email Workshops@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Workshop Day 1 Workshop Day 2
    Activities

    Task – Review and Learn the Basics

    Task – Learn More and Plan

    1.1 Review and capture your current process.

    1.2 Identify current stakeholders.

    1.3 Learn the operational framework of contract lifecycle management.

    1.4 Identify current process gaps.

    2.1 Understand the two phases of CLM.

    2.2 Learn the ten stages of CLM.

    2.3 Assess your CLM maturity.

    2.4 Identify and assign stakeholders.

    2.5 Discuss ROI.

    2.6 Summarize and next steps.

    Deliverables
    1. Internal interviews with business units
    2. Existing CLM Process Worksheet
    1. CLM Maturity Assessment
    2. RASCI Diagram
    3. Improvement Action Plan

    PHASE 1

    Master the Operational Framework of Contract Lifecycle Management

    Design and Build an Effective CLM Process

    Phase 1: Master the Operational Framework of Contract Lifecycle Management

    Call 1-888-670-8889 or email GuidedImplementations@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Complete these steps on your own, or call us to complete a guided implementation. A guided implementation is a series of
    2-3 advisory calls that help you execute each phase of a project. They are included in most advisory memberships.

    Guided Implementation 1: Master the Operational Framework of Contract Lifecycle Management
    Proposed Time to Completion: 1-4 weeks

    Step 1.1: Document your Current CLM Process

    Step 1.2: Read and Understand the Operational Framework

    Step 1.3: Review Solution Options

    Start with an analyst kick-off call:

    • Understand what your current process(es) is for each stage
    • Do a probative review of any current processes
    • Interview stakeholders for input

    Review findings with analyst:

    • Discuss the importance of the framework as the core of your plan
    • Review the gaps in your existing process
    • Understand how to prioritize next steps towards a CLM

    Finalize phase deliverable:

    • Establish ownership of the framework
    • Prioritize improvement areas or map out how your new CLM will look

    Then complete these activities…

    • Document the details of your process for each stage of CLM

    With these tools & templates:

    • Existing CLM Process Worksheet

    Phase 1 Results:

    • A full understanding of what makes a comprehensive contract management system.

    What Is Contract Lifecycle Management?

    • Every contract has a lifecycle, from creation to time and usage to expiration. Organizations using a legacy or manual contract management process usually ask, “What is contract lifecycle management and how will it benefit my business?”
    • Contract lifecycle management (CLM) creates a process that manages each contract or agreement. CLM eases the challenges of managing hundreds or even thousands of important business and IT contracts that affect the day-to-day business and could expose the organization to vendor risk.
    • Managing a few contracts is quite easy, but as the number of contracts grows, managing each step for each contract becomes increasingly difficult. Ultimately, it will get to a point where managing contracts properly becomes very difficult or seemingly impossible.

    That’s where contract lifecycle management (CLM) comes in.

    CLM can save money and improve revenue by:

    • Improving accuracy and decreasing errors through standardized contract templates and approved terms and conditions that will reduce repetitive tasks.
    • Securing contracts and processes through centralized software storage, minimizing risk of lost or misplaced contracts due to changes in physical assets like hard drives, network shares, and file cabinets.
    • Using policies and procedures that standardize, organize, track, and optimize IT contracts, eliminating time spent on creation, approvals, errors, and vendor compliance.
    • Reducing the organization’s exposure to risks and liability.
    • Having contracts renewed on time without penalties and with the most favorable terms for the business.

    The Operational Framework of Contract Lifecycle Management

    Four Components of the Operational Framework

    1. Organization
    2. Analysis
    3. Collaboration and Governance
    4. Integration/Vendor Management
    • By organizing at the core of the process and then analyzing each stage, you will maximize each step of the CLM process and ensure long-term contract management for the organization.
    • Collaboration and governance as overarching policies for the system will provide accountability to stakeholders and business units.
    • Integration and vendor management are encompassing features in a well-developed CLM that add visibility, additional value, and savings to the entire organization.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Putting a contract manager in place to manage the CLM project will accelerate the improvements and provide faster returns to the organizations. Reference Info-Tech’s Contract Manager Job Description template as needed.

    The operational framework is key to the success, return on investment (ROI), cost savings, and customer satisfaction of a CLM process.

    This image depicts Info-Tech's Operational Framework.  It consists of a series of five concentric circles, with each circle a different colour.  On the outer circle, is the word Integration.  The next outermost circle has the words Collaboration and Governance.  The next circle has no words, the next circle has the word Analysis, and the very centre circle has the word Organization.

    1. Organization

    • Every enterprise needs to organize its contract documents and data in a central repository so that everyone knows where to find the golden source of contractual truth.
    • This includes:
      • A repository for storing and organizing contract documents.
      • A data dictionary for describing the terms and conditions in a consistent, normalized way.
      • A database for persistent data storage.
      • An object model that tracks changes to the contract and its prevailing terms over time.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Paper is still alive and doing very well at slowing down the many stages of the contract process.

    2. Analysis

    Most organizations analyze their contracts in two ways:

    • First, they use reporting, search, and analytics to reveal risky and toxic terms so that appropriate operational strategies can be implemented to eliminate, mitigate, or transfer the risk.
    • Second, they use process analytics to reveal bottlenecks and points of friction as contracts are created, approved, and negotiated.

    3. Collaboration

    • Throughout the contract lifecycle, teams must collaborate on tasks both pre-execution and post-execution.
    • This includes document collaboration among several different departments across an enterprise.
    • The challenge is to make the collaboration smooth and transparent to avoid costly mistakes.
    • For some contracting tasks, especially in regulated industries, a high degree of control is required.
    • In these scenarios, the organization must implement controlled systems that restrict access to certain types of data and processes backed up with robust audit trails.

    4. Integration

    • For complete visibility into operational responsibilities, relationships, and risk, an organization must integrate its golden contract data with other systems of record.
    • An enterprise contracts platform must therefore provide a rich set of APIs and connectors so that information can be pushed into or pulled from systems for enterprise resource planning (ERP), customer relationship management (CRM), supplier relationship management (SRM), document management, etc.

    This is the ultimate goal of a robust contract management system!

    Member Activity: Document Current CLM Processes

    1.1 Completion Time: 1-5 days

    Goal: Document your existing CLM processes (if any) and who owns them, who manages them, etc.

    Instructions

    Interview internal business unit decision makers, stakeholders, Finance, Legal, CIO, VMO, Sales, and/or Procurement to understand what’s currently in place.

    1. Use the Existing CLM Process Worksheet to capture and document current CLM processes.
    2. Establish what processes, procedures, policies, and workflows, if any, are in place for pre-execution (Phase 1) contract stages.
    3. Do the same for post-execution (Phase 2) stages.
    4. Use this worksheet as reference for assessments and as a benchmark for improvement review six to 12 months later.
    This image contains a screenshot of Info-Tech's Existing CLM Process Discovery Worksheet

    INPUT

    • Internal information from all CLM stakeholders

    OUTPUT

    • A summary of processes and owners currently in place

    Materials

    • Existing CLM processes from interviews

    Participants

    • Finance, Legal, CIO, VMO, Sales, Procurement

    PHASE 2

    Understand the Ten Stages of Contract Lifecycle Management

    Design and Build an Effective CLM Process

    Phase 1: Master the Operational Framework of Contract Lifecycle Management

    Call 1-888-670-8889 or email GuidedImplementations@InfoTech.com for more information.

    Complete these steps on your own, or call us to complete a guided implementation. A guided implementation is a series of
    2-3 advisory calls that help you execute each phase of a project. They are included in most advisory memberships.

    Guided Implementation 2: Understand the Ten Stages of Contract Lifecycle Management

    Proposed Time to Completion: 1-10 weeks

    Step 2.1: Assess CLM Maturity

    Step 2.2: Complete a RASCI Diagram

    Start with an analyst kick-off call:

    • Review the importance of assessing the maturity of your current CLM processes
    • Discuss interview process for internal stakeholders
    • Use data from the Existing CLM Process Worksheet

    Review findings with analyst:

    • Review your maturity results
    • Identify stages that require immediate improvement
    • Prioritize improvement or implementation of process

    Then complete these activities…

    • Work through the maturity assessment process
    • Answer the questions in the assessment tool
    • Review the summary tab to learn where to focus improvement efforts

    Then complete these activities…

    • Using maturity assessment and existing process data, establish ownership for each process stage
    • Fill in the RASCI Chart based on internal review or existing processes

    With these tools & templates:

    • CLM Maturity Assessment Tool

    With these tools & templates:

    • CLM RASCI Diagram

    Phase 2 Results & Insights:

    • A full understanding of your current CLM process and where improvement is required
    • A mapping of stakeholders for each stage of the CLM process

    The Ten Stages of Contract Lifecycle Management

    There are ten key stages of contract lifecycle management.

    The steps are divided into two phases, pre-execution and post-execution.

      Pre-Execution (Phase 1)

    1. Request
    2. Create
    3. Review Risk
    4. Approve
    5. Negotiate
    6. Sign
    7. Post-Execution (Phase 2)

    8. Capture
    9. Manage
    10. Monitor Compliance
    11. Optimize

    Ten Process Stages Within the CLM Framework

    This image contains the CLM framework from earlier in the presentation, with the addition of the following ten steps: 1. Request; 2. Create Contract; 3. Review Risk; 4. Approve; 5. Negotiate; 6. Sign; 7. Capture; 8. Manage; 9. Monitor Compliance; 10. Optimize.

    Stage 1: Request or Initiate

    Contract lifecycle management begins with the contract requesting process, where one party requests for or initiates the contracting process and subsequently uses that information for drafting or authoring the contract document. This is usually the first step in CLM.

    Requests for contracts can come from various sources:

    • Business units within the organization
    • Vendors presenting their contract, including renewal agreements
    • System- or process-generated requests for renewal or extension

    At this stage, you need to validate if a non-disclosure agreement (NDA) is currently in place with the other party or is required before moving forward. At times, adequate NDA components could be included within the contract or agreement to satisfy corporate confidentiality requirements.

    Stage 1: Request or Initiate

    Stage Input

    • Information about what the contract needs to contain, such as critical dates, term length, coverage, milestones, etc.
    • Some organizations require that justification and budget approval be provided at this stage.
    • Request could come from a vendor as a pre-created contract.
    • Best practices recommend that a contract request form or template is used to standardize all required information.

    Stage Output

    • Completed request form, stored or posted with all details required to move forward to risk review and contract creation.
    • Possible audit trails.

    Stage 2: Create Contract

    • At the creation or drafting stage, the document is created, generated, or provided by the vendor. The document will contain all clauses, scope, terms and conditions, and pricing as required.
    • In some cases, a vendor-presented contract that is already prepared will go through an internal review or redlining process by the business unit and/or Legal.
    • Both internal and external review and redlining are included in this stage.
    • Also at this stage, the approvers and signing authorities are identified and added to the contract. In addition, some audit trail features may be added.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    For a comprehensive list of terms and conditions, see our Software Terms & Conditions Evaluation Tool within Master Contract Review and Negotiation for Software Agreements.

    Stage 2: Create Contract

    Stage Input

    • Contract request form, risk review/assessment.
    • Vendor- or contractor-provided contract/agreement, either soft copy, electronic form, or more frequently, “clickwrap” web-posted document.
    • Could also include a renewal notification from a vendor or from the CLM system or admin.

    Stage Output

    • Completed draft contract or agreement, typically in a Microsoft Word or Adobe PDF format with audit trail or comment tracking.
    • Redlined document for additional revision and or acceptance.
    • Amendment or addendum to existing contract.

    Stage 3: Review Risk 1 of 2

    The importance of risk review can not be understated. The contract or agreement must be reviewed by several stakeholders who can identify risks to the organization within the contract.

    Three important definitions:

    1. Risk is the potential for a negative outcome. A risk is crossing the street while wearing headphones and selecting the next track to play on your smartphone. A negative outcome is getting hit by an oncoming person who, unremarkably, was doing something similar at the same time.
    2. Risk mitigation is about taking the steps necessary to minimize both the likelihood of a risk occurring – look around both before and while crossing the street – and its impact if it does occur – fall if you must, but save the smartphone!
    3. Contract risk is about any number of situations that can cause a contract to fail, from trivially – the supplier delivers needed goods late – to catastrophically – the supplier goes out of business without having delivered your long-delayed orders.

    Stage 3: Review Risk 2 of 2

    • Contracts must be reviewed for business terms and conditions, potential risk situations from a financial or legal perspective, business commitments or obligations, and any operational concerns.
    • Mitigating contract risk requires a good understanding of what contracts are in place, how important they are to the success of the organization, and what data they contain.

    Collectively, this is known as contract visibility.

    • Risk avoidance and mitigation are also a key component in the ROI of a CLM system and should be tracked for analysis.
    • Risk-identifying forms or templates can be used to maintain consistency with corporate standards.

    Stage 3: Review Risk

    Stage Input

    • All details of the proposed contract so that a proper risk analysis can be done as well as appropriate review with stakeholders, including:
      • Finance
      • Legal
      • Procurement
      • Security
      • Line-of-business owner
      • IT stakeholders

    Stage Output

    • A list of identified concerns that could expose the business unit or organization.
    • Recommendations to minimize or eliminate identified risks.

    Stage 4: Approve

    The approval stage can be a short process if policies and procedures are already in place. Most organizations will have defined delegation of authority or approval authority depending on risk, value of the contract, and other corporate considerations.

    • Defined approval levels should be known within the organization and can be applied to the approval workflow, expediting the approval of drafted terms, conditions, changes, and cost/spend within the contract internally.
    • Tracking and flexibility needs to considered in the approval process.
    • Gates need to be in place to ensure that a required approver has approved the contract before it moves to the next approver.
    • Flexibility is needed in some situations for ad hoc approval tasks and should include audit trail as required.
    • Approvers can include business units, Finance, Legal, Security, and C-level leaders

    Stage 4: Approve

    Stage Input

    • Complete draft contract with all terms and conditions (T&Cs) and approval trail.
    • Amendment or addendum to existing contract.

    Stage Output

    • Approved draft contract ready to move to the next step of negotiating with the vendor.
    • Approved amendment or addendum to existing or renewal agreement.

    Stage 5: Negotiate

    • At this stage, there should be an approved draft of the contract that can be presented to the other party or vendor for review.
    • Typically organizations will negotiate their larger deals for terms and conditions with the goal of balancing the contractual allocation of risk with the importance of the vendor or agreement and its value to the business.
    • Several people on either side are typically involved and will discuss legal and commercial terms of the contract. Throughout the process, negotiators may leverage a variety of tools, including playbooks with preferred and fallback positions, clause libraries, document redlines and comparisons, and issue lists.
    • Audit trails or tracking of changes and acceptances is an important part of this stage. Tracking will avoid duplication and lost or missed changes and will speed up the entire process.
    • A final, clean document is created at this point and readied for execution.

    Stage 5: Negotiate

    Stage Input

    • Approved draft contract ready to move to the next step of negotiating with the vendor.
    • Approved amendment or addendum to existing or renewal agreement.

    Stage Output

    • A finalized and approved contract or amendment with agreed-upon terms and conditions ready for signatures.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Saving the different versions of a contract during negotiations will save time, provide reassurance of agreed terms as you move through the process, and provide reference for future negotiations with the vendor.

    Stage 6: Sign or Execute

    • At this stage in the process, all the heavy lifting in a contract’s creation is complete. Now it’s signature time.
    • To finalize the agreement, both parties need to the sign the final document. This can be done by an in-person wet ink signature or by what is becoming more prevalent, digital signature through an e-signature process.
    • Once complete, the final executed documents are exchanged or received electronically and then retained by each party.

    Stage 6: Sign or Execute

    Stage Input

    • A finalized and approved contract or amendment with agreed-upon terms and conditions ready for signatures.

    Stage Output

    • An executed contract or amendment ready to move to the next stage of CLM, capturing in the repository.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Process flow provisions should made for potential rejection of the contract by signatories, looping the contract back to the appropriate stage for rework or revision.

    Stage 7: Capture in Database/Repository 1 of 2

    • This is one of the most important stages of a CLM process. Executed agreements need to be stored in a single manageable, searchable, reportable, and centralized repository.
    • All documents should to be captured electronically, reviewed for accuracy, and then posted to the CLM repository.
    • The repository can be in various formats depending on the maturity, robustness, and budget of the CLM program.

    Most repositories are some type of database:

    • An off-the-shelf product
    • A PaaS cloud-based solution
    • A homegrown, internally developed database
    • An add-on module to your ERP system

    Stage 7: Capture in Database/Repository 2 of 2

    Several important features of an electronic repository should be considered:

    • Consistent metadata tagging of clauses, terms, conditions, dates, etc.
    • Centralized summary view of all contracts
    • Controlled access for those who need to review and manage the contracts

    Establishing an effective repository will be key to providing measurable value to the organization and saving large amounts of time for the business unit.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Planning for future needs by investing a little more money into a better, more robust repository could pay bigger dividends to the VMO and organization while providing a higher ROI over time as advanced functionality is deployed.

    Stage 8: Manage

    • Once an agreement is captured in the repository, it needs to be managed from both an operational and a commitment perspective.
    • Through a summary view or master list, contracts need to be operationally managed for end dates and renewals, vendor performance, discounts, and rebates.
    • Managing contracts for commitment and compliance will ensure all contract requirements, rights, service-level agreements (SLAs), and terms are fulfilled. This will eliminate the high costs of missed SLAs, potential breaches, or missed renewals.
    • Managing contracts can be improved by adding metadata to the records that allow for easier search and retrieval of contracts or even proactive notification.
    • The repository management features can and should be available to business stakeholders, or reporting from a CLM admin can also alert stakeholders to renewals, pricing, SLAs, etc.
    • Also important to this stage is reporting. This can be done by an admin or via a self-serve feature for stakeholders, or it could even be automated.

    Stage 9: Monitor Compliance 1 of 2

    • At this stage, the contracts or agreements need to be monitored for the polices within them and the purpose for which they were signed.
    • This is referred to as obligation management and is a key step to providing savings to the organization and mitigating risk.
    • Many contracts contain commitments by each party. These can include but are not limited to SLAs, service uptime targets, user counts, pricing threshold discounts and rebates, renewal notices to vendors, and training requirements.
    • All of these obligations within the contracts should be summarized and monitored to ensure that all commitments are delivered on. Managing obligations will mitigate risks, maximize savings and rebates to the organization, and minimize the potential for a breach within the contract.

    Stage 9: Monitor Compliance 2 of 2

    • Monitoring and measuring vendor commitments and performance will also be a key factor in maximizing the benefits of the contract through vendor accountability.
    • Also included in this stage is renewal and/or disposition of the contract. If renewal is due, it should go back to the business unit for submission to the Stage 1: Request process. If the business unit is not going to renew the contract, the contract must be tagged and archived for future reference.

    Stage 10: Optimize

    • The goal of this stage is to improve the other stages of the process as well as evaluate how each stage is integrating with the core operational framework processes.
    • With more data and improved insight into contractual terms and performance, a business can optimize its portfolio for better value, greater savings, and lower-risk outcomes.
    • For high-performance contract teams, the goal is a continuous feedback loop between the contract portfolio and business performance. If, for example, the data shows that certain negotiation issues consume a large chunk of time but yield no measurable difference in risk or performance, you may tweak the playbook to remedy those issues quickly.

    Additional optimization tactics:

    • Streamlining contract renewals with auto-renew
    • Predefined risk review process or template, continuous review/improvement of negotiation playbook
    • Better automation or flow of approval process
    • Better signature delegation process if required
    • Improving repository search with metadata tagging
    • Automating renewal tracking or notice process
    • Tracking the time a contract spends in each stage

    Establish Your Current CLM Maturity Position

    • Sometimes organizations have a well-defined pre-execution process but have a poor post-signature process.
    • Identifying your current processes or lack thereof will provide you with a starting point in developing a plan for your CLM. It’s possible that most of the stages are there and just need some improvements, or maybe some are missing and need to be implemented.
    • It’s not unusual for organizations to have a manual pre-execution process and an automated backend repository with compliance and renewal notices features.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    Use the CLM Maturity Assessment Tool to outline where your organization is at each stage of the process.

    Member Activity: Assess Current CLM Maturity

    2.1 Completion Time 1-2 days

    Goal: Identify and measure your existing CLM processes, if any, and provide a maturity value to each stage. The resulting scores will provide a maturity assessment of your CLM.

    Instructions

    1. Use the Existing CLM Process Worksheet to document current CLM processes.
    2. Using the CLM worksheet info, answer the questions in the CLM Maturity Assessment Tool.
    3. Review the results and scores on Tab 3 to see where you need to focus your initial improvements.
    4. Save the initial assessment for future reference and reassess in six to 12 months to measure progress.

    This image contains a screenshot from Info-Tech's CLM Maturity Assessment Tool.

    INPUT

    • Internal information from all CLM stakeholders

    OUTPUT

    • A summary of processes and owners currently in place in the organization

    Materials

    • Existing CLM processes from interviews

    Participants

    • Finance, Legal, CIO, VMO, Sales, Procurement

    Member Activity: Complete RASCI Chart

    2.2 Completion Time 2-6 hours

    Goal: Identify who in your organization is primarily accountable and involved in each stage of the CLM process.

    Instructions

    Engage internal business unit decision makers, stakeholders, Finance, Legal, CIO, VMO, Sales, and Procurement as required to validate who should be involved in each stage.

    1. Using the information collected from internal reviews, assign a level in the CLM RASCI Diagram to each team member.
    2. Use the resulting RASCI diagram to guide you through developing or improving your CLM stages.

    This image contains a screenshot from Info-Tech's CLM RASCI Diagram.

    INPUT

    • Internal interview information

    OUTPUT

    • Understanding of who is involved in each CLM stage

    Materials

    • Interview data
    • RASCI Diagram

    Participants

    • Finance, Legal, CIO, VMO, Sales, Procurement

    Applying CLM Framework and Stages to Your Organization

    • Understand what CLM process you currently do or do not have in place.
    • Review implementation options: automated, semi-automated, and manual solutions.
    • If you are improving an existing process, focus on one phase at a time, perfect it, and then move to the other phase. This can also be driven by budget and time.
    • Create a plan to start with and then move to automating or semi-automating the stages.
    • Building onto or enhancing an existing system or processes can be a cost-effective method to produce near-term measurable savings
    • Focus on one phase at a time, then move on to the other phase.
    • While reviewing implementation of or improvements to CLM stages, be sure to track or calculate the potential time and cost savings and risk mitigation. This will help in any required business case for a CLM.

    CLM: An ROI Discussion 1 of 2

    • ROI can be easier to quantify and measure in larger organizations with larger CLM, but ROI metrics can be obtained regardless of the company or CLM size.
    • Organizations recognize their ROI through gains in efficiency across the entire business as well as within individual departments involved in the contracting process. They also do so by reducing the risk associated with decentralized and insecure storage of and access to their contracts, failure to comply with terms of their contracts, and missing deadlines associated with contracts.

    Just a few of the factors to consider within your own organization include:

    • The number of people inside and outside your company that touch your contracts.
    • The number of hours spent weekly, monthly, and annually managing contracts.
    • Potential efficiencies gained in better managing those contracts.
    • The total number of contracts that exist at any given time.
    • The average value and total value of those contract types.
    • The potential risk of being in breach of any of those contracts.
    • The number of places contracts are stored.
    • The level of security that exists to prevent unauthorized access.
    • The potential impact of unauthorized access to your sensitive contract data.

    CLM: An ROI Discussion 2 of 2

    Decision-Maker Apprehensions

    Decision-maker concerns arise from a common misunderstanding – that is, a fundamental failure to appreciate the true source of contract management value. This misunderstanding goes back many years to the time when analysts first started to take an interest in contract management and its automation. Their limited experience (primarily in retail and manufacturing sectors) led them to think of contract management as essentially an administrative function, primarily focused on procurement of goods. In such environments, the purpose of automation is focused on internal efficiency, augmented by the possibility of savings from reduced errors (e.g. failing to spot a renewal or expiry date) or compliance (ensuring use of standard terms).

    Today’s CLM systems and processes can provide ROI in several areas in the business.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Research on ROI of CLM software shows significant hard cost savings to an organization. For example, a $10 million company with 300 contracts valued at $3 million could realize savings of $83,400 and avoid up to $460,000 in lost revenues. (Derived from: ACCDocket, 2018)

    Additional Considerations 1 of 2

    Who should own and/or manage the CLM process within an organization? Legal, VMO, business unit, Sales?

    This is an often-discussed question. Research suggests that there is no definitive answer, as there are several variables.

    Organizations needs to review what makes the best business sense for them based on several considerations and then decide where CLM belongs.

    • Business unit budgets and time management
    • Available Administration personnel and time
    • IT resources
    • Security and access concerns
    • Best fit based on organizational structure

    35% of law professionals feel contract management is a legal responsibility, while 45% feel it’s a business responsibility and a final 20% are unsure where it belongs. (Source: “10 Eye-Popping Contract Management Statistics,” Apttus, 2018)

    Additional Considerations 2 of 2

    What type of CLM software or platform should we use?

    This too is a difficult question to answer definitively. Again, there are several variables to consider. As well, several solutions are available, and this is not a one-size-fits-all scenario.

    As with who should own the CLM process, organizations must review the various CLM software solutions available that will meet their current and future needs and then ask, “What do we need the system to do?”

    • Do you build a “homegrown” solution?
    • Should it be an add-on module to the current ERP or CRM system?
    • Is on-premises more suitable?
    • Is an adequate off-the-shelf (OTS) solution available?
    • What about the many cloud offerings?
    • Is there a basic system to start with that can expand as you grow?

    Info-Tech Insight

    When considering what type of solution to choose, prioritize what needs to been done or improved. Sometimes solutions can be deployed in phases as an “add-on” type modules.

    Summary of Accomplishment

    Knowledge Gained

    • Documented current CLM process
    • Core operational framework to build a CLM process on
    • Understanding of best practices required for a sustainable CLM

    Processes Optimized

    • Internal RASCI process identified
    • Existing internal stage improvements
    • Internal review process for risk mitigation

    Deliverables Completed

    • Existing CLM Processes Worksheet
    • CLM Maturity Assessment
    • CLM RASCI Chart
    • CLM improvement plan

    Project Step Summary

    Client Project: CLM Assessment and Improvement Plan

    1. Set your goals – what do you want to achieve in your CLM project?
    2. Assess your organization’s current CLM position in relation to CLM best practices and stages.
    3. Map your organization’s RASCI structure for CLM.
    4. Identify opportunities for stage improvements or target all low stage assessments.
    5. Prioritize improvement processes.
    6. Track ROI metrics.
    7. Develop a CLM implementation or improvement plan.

    Info-Tech Insight

    This project can fit your organization’s schedule:

    • Do-it-yourself with your team.
    • Remote delivery (Info-Tech Guided Implementation).

    CLM Blueprint Summary and Conclusion

    • Contract management is a vital component of a responsible VMO that will benefit all business units in an organization, save time and money, and reduce risk exposure.
    • A basic well-deployed and well-managed CLM will provide ROI in the short term.
    • Setting an improvement plan with concise improvements and potential cost savings based on process improvements will help your business case for CLM get approval and leadership buy-in.
    • Educating and aligning all business units and stakeholders to any changes to CLM processes will ensure that cost savings and ROI are achieved.
    • When evaluating a CLM software solution, use the operational framework and the ten process stages in this blueprint as a reference guide for CLM vendor functionality and selection.

    Related Info-Tech Research

    Master Contract Review and Negotiation

    Optimize spend with significant cost savings and negotiate from a position of strength.

    Manage Your Vendors Before They Manage You

    Maximize the value of vendor relationships.

    Bibliography

    Burla, Daniel. “The Must Know Of Transition to Dynamics 365 on Premise.” Sherweb, 14 April 2017. Web.

    Anand, Vishal, “Strategic Considerations in Implementing an End-to-End Contract Lifecycle Management Solution.” DWF Mindcrest, 20 Aug. 2016. Web.

    Alspaugh, Zach. “10 Eye-Popping Contract Management Statistics from the General Counsel’s Technology Report.” Apttus, 23 Nov. 2018. Web.

    Bishop, Randy. “Contract Management is not just a cost center.” ContractSafe, 9 Sept. 2019. Web.

    Bryce, Ian. “Contract Management KPIs - Measuring What Matters.” Gatekeeper, 2 May 2019. Web.

    Busch, Jason. “Contract Lifecycle Management 101.” Determine. 4 Jan. 2018. Web.

    “Contract Management Software Buyer's Guide.” TechnologyAdvice, 5 Aug. 2019. Web.

    Dunne, Michael. “Analysts Predict that 2019 will be a Big Year for Contract Lifecycle Management.” Apttus, 19 Nov. 2018. Web.

    “FIS Case Study.” Apttus, n.d. Web.

    Gutwein, Katie. “3 Takeaways from the 2018 State of Contract Management Report.” SpringCM, 2018. Web.

    “IACCM 2019 Benchmark Report.” IAACM, 4 Sept. 2019. Web.

    Linsley, Rod. “How Proverbial Wisdom Can Help Improve Contract Risk Mitigation.” Gatekeeper, 2 Aug. 2019. Web.

    Mars, Scott. “Contract Management Data Extraction.” Exari, 20 June 2017. Web.

    Rodriquez, Elizabeth. “Global Contract Life-Cycle Management Market Statistics and Trends 2019.” Business Tech Hub, 17 June 2017. Web.

    “State of Contract Management Report.” SpringCM, 2018. Web.

    Teninbaum, Gabriel, and Arthur Raguette. “Realizing ROI from Contract Management Technology.” ACCDocket.com, 29 Jan. 2018. Web.

    Wagner, Thomas. “Strategic Report on Contract Life cycle Management Software Market with Top Key Players- IBM Emptoris, Icertis, SAP, Apttus, CLM Matrix, Oracle, Infor, Newgen Software, Zycus, Symfact, Contract Logix, Coupa Software.” Market Research, 21 June 2019. Web.

    “What is Your Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) Persona?” Spend Matters, 19 Oct. 2017. Web.

    Master Your Security Incident Response Communications Program

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}321|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 8.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $2,339 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 5 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Threat Intelligence & Incident Response
    • Parent Category Link: /threat-intelligence-incident-response
    • When a significant security incident is discovered, usually very few details are known for certain. Nevertheless, the organization will need to say something to affected stakeholders.
    • Security incidents tend to be ongoing situations that last considerably longer than other types of crises, making communications a process rather than a one-time event.
    • Effective incident response communications require collaboration from: IT, Legal, PR, and HR – groups that often speak “different languages.”

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • There’s no such thing as successful incident response communications; strive instead for effective communications. There will always be some fallout after a security incident, but it can be effectively mitigated through honesty, transparency, and accountability.
    • Effective external communications begin with effective internal communications. Security Incident Response Team members come from departments that don’t usually work closely with each other. This means they often have different ways of thinking and speaking about issues. Be sure they are familiar with each other before a crisis occurs.
    • You won’t save face by withholding embarrassing details. Lying only makes a bad situation worse, but coming clean and acknowledging shortcomings (and how you’ve fixed them) can go a long way towards restoring stakeholders’ trust.

    Impact and Result

    • Effective and efficient management of security incidents involves a formal process of preparation, detection, analysis, containment, eradication, recovery, and post-incident activities: communications must be integrated into each of these phases.
    • Understand that prior planning helps to take the guesswork out of incident response communications. By preparing for several different types of security incidents, the communications team will get used to working with each other, as well as learning what strategies are and are not effective. Remember, the communications team contains diverse members from various departments, and each may have different ideas about what information is important to release.

    Master Your Security Incident Response Communications Program Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should implement a security incident response communications plan, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Dive into communications planning

    This phase addresses the benefits and challenges of incident response communications and offers advice on how to assemble a communications team and develop a threat escalation protocol.

    • Master Your Security Incident Response Communications Program – Phase 1: Dive Into Communications Planning
    • Security Incident Management Plan

    2. Develop your communications plan

    This phase focuses on creating an internal and external communications plan, managing incident fallout, and conducting a post-incident review.

    • Master Your Security Incident Response Communications Program – Phase 2: Develop Your Communications Plan
    • Security Incident Response Interdepartmental Communications Template
    • Security Incident Communications Policy Template
    • Security Incident Communications Guidelines and Templates
    • Security Incident Metrics Tool
    • Tabletop Exercises Package
    [infographic]

    Application Portfolio Management Foundations

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}172|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.4/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $54,542 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 21 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Architecture & Strategy
    • Parent Category Link: /architecture-and-strategy

    Organizations consider application oversight a low priority and app portfolio knowledge is poor:

    • No dedicated or centralized effort to manage the app portfolio means no single source of truth is available to support informed decision making.
    • Organizations acquire more applications over time, creating redundancy, waste, and the need for additional support.
    • Organizations are more vulnerable to changing markets. Flexibility and growth are compromised when applications are unadaptable or cannot scale.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • You cannot outsource application strategy.
    • Modern software options have lessened the need for organizations to have robust in-house application management capabilities. But your applications’ future and governance of the portfolio still require centralized oversight to ensure the best overall return on investment.
    • Application portfolio management is the mechanism to ensure that the applications in your enterprise are delivering value and support for your value streams and business capabilities. Understanding value, satisfaction, technical health, and total cost of ownership are critical to digital transformation, modernization, and roadmaps.

    Impact and Result

    Build an APM program that is actionable and fit for size:

    • Understand your current state, needs, and goals for your application portfolio management.
    • Create an application and platform inventory that is built for better decision making.
    • Rationalize your apps with business priorities and communicate risk in operational terms.
    • Create a roadmap that improves communication between those who own, manage, and support your applications.

    Application Portfolio Management Foundations Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Application Portfolio Management Foundations Deck – A guide that helps you establish your core application inventory, simplified rationalization, redundancy comparison, and modernization roadmap.

    Enterprises have more applications than they need and rarely apply oversight to monitor the health, cost, and relative value of applications to ensure efficiency and minimal risk. This blueprint will help you build a streamlined application portfolio management process.

    • Application Portfolio Management Foundations – Phases 1-4

    2. Application Portfolio Management Diagnostic Tool – A tool that assesses your current application portfolio.

    Visibility into your application portfolio and APM practices will help inform and guide your next steps.

    • Application Portfolio Management Diagnostic Tool

    3. Application Portfolio Management Foundations Playbook – A template that builds your application portfolio management playbook.

    Capture your APM roles and responsibilities and build a repeatable process.

    • Application Portfolio Management Foundations Playbook

    4. Application Portfolio Management Snapshot and Foundations Tool – A tool that stores application information and allows you to execute rationalization and build a portfolio roadmap.

    This tool is the central hub for the activities within Application Portfolio Management Foundations.

    • Application Portfolio Management Snapshot and Foundations Tool
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Application Portfolio Management Foundations

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Lay Your Foundations

    The Purpose

    Work with key corporate stakeholders to come to a shared understanding of the benefits and aspects of application portfolio management.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Establish the goals of APM.

    Set the scope of APM responsibilities.

    Establish business priorities for the application portfolio.

    Activities

    1.1 Define goals and metrics.

    1.2 Define application categories.

    1.3 Determine steps and roles.

    1.4 Weight value drivers.

    Outputs

    Set short- and long-term goals and metrics.

    Set the scope for applications.

    Set the scope for the APM process.

    Defined business value drivers.

    2 Improve Your Inventory

    The Purpose

    Gather information on your applications to build a detailed inventory and identify areas of redundancy.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Populated inventory based on your and your team’s current knowledge.

    Understanding of outstanding data and a plan to collect it.

    Activities

    2.1 Populate inventory.

    2.2 Assign business capabilities.

    2.3 Review outstanding data.

    Outputs

    Initial application inventory

    List of areas of redundancy

    Plan to collect outstanding data

    3 Gather Application Information

    The Purpose

    Work with the application subject matter experts to collect and compile data points and determine the appropriate disposition for your apps.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Dispositions for individual applications

    Application rationalization framework

    Activities

    3.1 Assess business value.

    3.2 Assess end-user perspective.

    3.3 Assess TCO.

    3.4 Assess technical health.

    3.5 Assess redundancies.

    3.6 Determine dispositions.

    Outputs

    Business value score for individual applications

    End-user satisfaction scores for individual applications

    TCO score for individual applications

    Technical health scores for individual applications

    Feature-level assessment of redundant applications

    Assigned dispositions for individual applications

    4 Gather, Assess, and Select Dispositions

    The Purpose

    Work with application delivery specialists to determine the strategic plans for your apps and place these in your portfolio roadmap.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Prioritized initiatives

    Initial application portfolio roadmap

    Ongoing structure of APM

    Activities

    4.1 Prioritize initiatives

    4.2 Populate roadmap.

    4.3 Determine ongoing APM cadence.

    4.4 Build APM action plan.

    Outputs

    Prioritized new potential initiatives.

    Built an initial portfolio roadmap.

    Established an ongoing cadence of APM activities.

    Built an action plan to complete APM activities.

    Further reading

    Application Portfolio Management Foundations

    Ensure your application portfolio delivers the best possible return on investment.

    Analyst Perspective

    You can’t outsource accountability.

    Many lack visibility into their overall application portfolio, focusing instead on individual projects or application development. Inevitably, application sprawl creates process and data disparities, redundant applications, and duplication of resources and stands as a significant barrier to business agility and responsiveness. The shift from strategic investment to application maintenance creates an unnecessary constraint on innovation and value delivery.

    With the rise and convenience of SAAS solutions, IT has an increasing need to discover and support all applications in the organization. Unmanaged and unsanctioned applications can lead to increased reputational risk. What you don’t know WILL hurt you.

    You can outsource development, you can even outsource maintenance, but you cannot outsource accountability for the portfolio. Organizations need a holistic dashboard of application performance and dispositions to help guide and inform planning and investment discussions. Application portfolio management (APM) can’t tell you why something is broken or how to fix it, but it is an important tool to determine if an application’s value and performance are up to your standards and can help meet your future goals.

    The image contains a picture of Hans Eckman.

    Hans Eckman
    Principal Research Director
    Info-Tech Research Group


    Is this research right for you?

    Research Navigation

    Managing your application portfolio is essential regardless of its size or whether your software is purchased or developed in house. Each organization must have some degree of application portfolio management to ensure that applications deliver value efficiently and that their risk or gradual decline in technical health is appropriately limited.

    Your APM goals

    If this describes your primary goal(s)

    • We are building a business case to determine where and if APM is needed now.
    • We want to understand how well supported are our business capabilities, departments, or core functions by our current applications.
    • We want to start our APM program with our core or critical applications.
    • We want to build our APM inventory for less than 150 applications (division, department, operating unit, government, small enterprise, etc.).
    • We want to start simple with a quick win for our 150 most important applications.
    • We want to start with an APM pilot before committing to an enterprise APM program.
    • We need to rationalize potentially redundant and underperforming applications to determine which to keep, replace, or retire.
    • We want to start enterprise APM, with up to 150 critical applications.
    • We want to collect and analyze detailed information about our applications.
    • We need tools to help us calculate total cost of ownership (TCO) and value.
    • We want to customize our APM journey and rationalization.
    • We want to build a formal communication strategy for our APM program.

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    Common Obstacles

    Info-Tech’s Approach

    • Organizations consider application oversight a low priority and app portfolio knowledge is poor.
    • No dedicated or centralized effort to manage the app portfolio means no single source of truth is available to support informed decision making.
    • Organizations acquire more applications over time, creating redundancy, waste, and the need for additional support.
    • Organizations are more vulnerable to changing markets. Flexibility and growth are compromised when applications are unadaptable or cannot scale.
    • APM implies taking a holistic approach and compiling multiple priorities and perspectives.
    • Organizations have limited time to act strategically or proactively and need to be succinct.
    • Uncertainties on business value prevent IT from successfully advising software decision making.
    • IT knows its technical debt but struggles to get the business to act on technical risks.
    • Attempts at exposing these problems rarely gain buy-in and discourage the push for improvement.
    • Think low priority over no priority.
    • Integrate these tasks into your mixed workload.
    • Create an inventory built for better decision making.
    • Rationalize your apps in accordance with business priorities and communicate risks on their terms.
    • Create a roadmap that improves communication between those who own, manage, and support an application.
    • Build your APM process fit for size.

    Info-Tech Insight: You can’t outsource strategy.

    Modern software options have decreased the need for organizations to have robust in-house application management capabilities. Your applications’ future and governance of the portfolio still require a centralized IT oversight to ensure the best return on investment.

    The top IT challenges for SE come from app management

    #1 challenge small enterprise owners face in their use of technology:

    Taking appropriate security precautions

    24%

    The costs of needed upgrades to technology

    17%

    The time it takes to fix problems

    17%

    The cost of maintaining technology

    14%

    Lack of expertise

    9%

    Breaks in service

    7%
    Source: National Small Business Association, 2019

    Having more applications than an organization needs means unnecessarily high costs and additional burden on the teams who support the applications. Especially in the case of small enterprises, this is added pressure the IT team cannot afford.

    A poorly maintained portfolio will eventually hurt the business more than it hurts IT.

    Legacy systems, complex environments, or anything that leads to a portfolio that can’t adapt to changing business needs will eventually become a barrier to business growth and accomplishing objectives. Often the blame is put on the IT department.

    56%

    of small businesses cited inflexible technology as a barrier to growth

    Source: Salesforce as quoted by Tech Republic, 2019

    A hidden and inefficient application portfolio is the root cause of so many pains experienced by both IT and the business.

    • Demand/Capacity Imbalance
    • Overspending
    • Security and Business Continuity Risk
    • Delays in Delivery
    • Barriers to Growth

    APM comes at a justified cost

    The image contains a screenshot of a graph to demonstrate APM and the costs.

    The benefits of APM

    APM identifies areas where you can reduce core spending and reinvest in innovation initiatives.

    Other benefits can include:

    • Fewer redundancies
    • Less risk
    • Less complexity
    • Improved processes
    • Flexibility
    • Scalability

    APM allows you to better understand and set the direction of your portfolio

    Application Inventory

    The artifact that documents and informs the business of your application portfolio.

    Application Rationalization

    The process of collecting information and assessing your applications to determine recommended dispositions.

    Application Alignment

    The process of revealing application information through interviewing stakeholders and aligning to business capabilities.

    Application Roadmap

    The artifact that showcases the strategic directions for your applications over a given timeline.

    Application Portfolio Management (APM):

    The ongoing practice of:

    • Providing visibility into applications across the organization.
    • Recommending corrections or enhancements to decision makers.
    • Aligning delivery teams on priority.
    • Showcasing the direction of applications to stakeholders.

    Create a balanced approach to value delivery

    Enterprise Agility and Value Realization

    Product Lifecycle Management

    Align your product and service improvement and execution to enterprise strategy and value realization in three key areas: defining your products and services, aligning product/service owners, and developing your product vision.

    Product Delivery Lifecycle (Agile DevOps)

    Enhance business agility by leveraging an Agile mindset and continuously improving your delivery throughput, quality, value realization, and adaptive governance.

    Application Portfolio Management

    Transform your application portfolio into a cohesive service catalog aligned to your business capabilities by discovering, rationalizing, and modernizing your applications while improving application maintenance, management, and reuse.

    The image contains a screenshot of a Thought Model on the Application Department Strategy.


    The image contains a screenshot of a Thought Model on Accelerate Your Transition to Product Delivery.

    Every organization experiences some degree of application sprawl

    The image contains a screenshot of images to demonstrate application sprawl.

    Causes of Sprawl

    • Poor Lifecycle Management
    • Turnover & Lack of Knowledge Transfer
    • Siloed Business Units & Decentralized IT
    • Business-Managed IT
    • (Shadow IT)
    • Mergers & Acquisitions

    Problems With Sprawl

    • Redundancy and Inefficient Spending
    • Disparate Apps & Data
    • Obsolescence
    • Difficulties in Prioritizing Support
    • Barriers to Change & Growth

    Application Sprawl:

    Inefficiencies within your application portfolio are created by the gradual and non-strategic accumulation of applications.

    You have more apps than you need.

    Only 34% of software is rated as both IMPORTANT and EFFECTIVE by users.

    Source: Info-Tech’s CIO Business Vision

    Build your APM journey map

    The image contains screenshots of diagrams that reviews building your APM journey map.

    Application rationalization provides insight

    Directionless portfolio of applications

    Info-Tech’s Five Lens Model

    Assigned dispositions for individual apps

    The image contains a screenshot of an example of directionless portfolio of applications.

    Application Alignment

    Business Value

    Technical Health

    End-User Perspective

    Total Cost of Ownership (TCO)

    Maintain: Keep the application but adjust its support structure.

    Modernize: Create a new initiative to address an inadequacy.

    Consolidate: Create a new initiative to reduce duplicate functionality.

    Retire: Phase out the application.

    Disposition: The intended strategic direction or implied course of action for an application.

    How well do your apps support your core functions and teams?

    How well are your apps aligned to value delivery?

    Do your apps meet all IT quality standards and policies?

    How well do your apps meet your end users’ needs?

    What is the relative cost of ownership and operation of your apps?

    Application rationalization requires the collection of several data points that represent these perspectives and act as the criteria for determining a disposition for each of your applications.

    APM is an iterative and evergreen process

    APM provides oversight and awareness of your application portfolio’s performance and support for your business operations and value delivery to all users and customers.

    Determine Scope and categories Build your list of applications and capabilities Score each application based on your values Determine outcomes based on app scoring and support for capabilities

    1. Lay Your Foundations

    1.1 Assess the state of your current application portfolio.

    1.2 Determine narrative.

    1.3 Define goals and metrics.

    1.4 Define application categories.

    1.5 Determine APM steps and roles (SIPOC).

    2. Improve Your Inventory

    2.1 Populate your inventory.

    2.2 Align to business capabilities.

    *Repeat

    3. Rationalize Your Apps

    3.1 Assess business value.

    3.2 Assess technical health.

    3.3 Assess end-user perspective.

    3.4 Assess total cost of ownership.

    *Repeat

    4. Populate Your Roadmap

    4.1 Review APM Snapshot results.

    4.2 Review APM Foundations results.

    4.3 Determine dispositions.

    4.4 Assess redundancies (optional).

    4.5 Determine dispositions for redundant applications (optional).

    4.6 Prioritize initiatives.

    4.7 Determine ongoing cadence.

    *Repeat

    Repeat according to APM cadence and application changes

    Executive Brief Case Study

    INDUSTRY: Retail

    SOURCE: Deloitte, 2017

    Supermarket Company

    The grocer was a smaller organization for the supermarket industry with a relatively low IT budget. While its portfolio consisted of a dozen applications, the organization still found it difficult to react to an evolving industry due to inflexible and overly complex legacy systems.

    The IT manager found himself in a scenario where he knew the applications well but had little awareness of the business processes they supported. Application maintenance was purely in keeping things operational, with little consideration for a future business strategy.

    As the business demanded more responsiveness to changes, the IT team needed to be able to react more efficiently and effectively while still securing the continuity of the business.

    The IT manager found success by introducing APM and gaining a better understanding of the business use and future needs for the applications. The organization started small but then increased the scope over time to produce and develop techniques to aid the business in meeting strategic goals with applications.

    Results

    The IT manager gained credibility and trust within the organization. The organization was able to build a plan to move away from the legacy systems and create a portfolio more responsive to the dynamic needs of an evolving marketplace.

    The application portfolio management initiative included the following components:

    Train teams and stakeholders on APM

    Model the core business processes

    Collect application inventory

    Assign APM responsibilities

    Start small, then grow

    Info-Tech’s application portfolio management methodology

    1. Lay Your Foundations

    2. Improve Your Inventory

    3. Rationalize Your Apps

    4. Populate Your Roadmap

    Phase Activities

    1.1 Assess your current application portfolio

    1.2 Determine narrative

    1.3 Define goals and metrics

    1.4 Define application categories

    1.5 Determine APM steps and roles

    2.1 Populate your inventory

    2.2 Align to business capabilities

    3.1 Assess business value

    3.2 Assess technical health

    3.3 Assess end-user perspective

    3.4 Assess total cost of ownership

    4.1 Review APM Snapshot results

    4.2 Review APM Foundations results

    4.3 Determine dispositions

    4.4 Assess redundancies (optional)

    4.5 Determine dispositions for redundant applications (optional)

    4.6 Prioritize initiatives

    4.7 Determine ongoing APM cadence

    Phase Outcomes

    Work with the appropriate management stakeholders to:

    • Extract key business priorities.
    • Set your goals.
    • Define scope of APM effort.

    Gather information on your own understanding of your applications to build a detailed inventory and identify areas of redundancy.

    Work with application subject matter experts to collect and compile data points and determine the appropriate disposition for your apps.

    Work with application delivery specialists to determine the strategic plans for your apps and place these in your portfolio roadmap.

    Blueprint deliverables

    Each step of this blueprint is accompanied by supporting deliverables to help you accomplish your goals.

    Application Portfolio Management Foundations Playbook

    Application Portfolio Management Snapshot and Foundations Tool

    This template allows you to capture your APM roles and responsibilities and build a repeatable process.

    This tool stores all relevant application information and allows you to assess your capability support, execute rationalization, and build a portfolio roadmap.

    The image contains screenshots of the Application Portfolio Management Foundations Playbook. The image contains screenshots of the Application Portfolio Management Snapshot and Foundations Tool.

    Key deliverable:

    Blueprint Storyboard

    This is the PowerPoint document you are viewing now. Follow this guide to understand APM, learn how to use the tools, and build a repeatable APM process that will be captured in your playbook.

    The image contains a screenshot of the blueprint storyboard.

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    Guided Implementation

    Workshop

    Consulting

    “Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful.” “Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track.” “We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place.” “Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project.”

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

    Guided Implementation

    What does a typical GI for on this topic look like?

    Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4

    Call #1: Establish goals and foundations for your APM practice.

    Call #2:

    Initiate inventory and determine data requirements.

    Call #3:

    Initiate rationalization with group of applications.

    Call #4:

    Review result of first iteration and perform retrospective.

    Call #5:

    Initiate your roadmap and determine your ongoing APM practice.

    Note: The Guided Implementation will focus on a subset or group of applications depending on the state of your current APM inventory and available time. The goal is to use this first group to build your APM process and models to support your ongoing discovery, rationalization, and modernization efforts.

    A Guided Implementation (GI) is a series of calls with an Info-Tech analyst to help implement our right-sized best practices in your organization. A typical GI, using our materials, is 3 to 6 calls over the course of 1 to 3 months.

    Workshop Overview

    Contact your account representative for more information.
    workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8889

    1. Lay Your Foundations

    2. Improve Your Inventory

    3. Rationalize Your Apps

    4. Populate Your Roadmap

    Post Workshop Steps

    Activities

    1.1 Assess your current
    application portfolio

    1.2 Determine narrative

    1.3 Define goals and metrics

    1.4 Define application categories

    1.5 Determine APM steps and roles

    2.1 Populate your inventory

    2.2 Align to business capabilities

    3.1 Assess business value

    3.2 Assess technical health

    3.3 Assess end-user perspective

    3.4 Assess total cost of ownership

    4.1 Review APM Snapshot results

    4.2 Review APM Foundations results

    4.3 Determine dispositions

    4.4 Assess redundancies (optional)

    4.5 Determine dispositions for redundant applications (optional)

    4.6 Prioritize initiatives

    4.7 Determine ongoing APM cadence

    • Complete in-progress deliverables from the previous four days.
    • Set up review time for workshop deliverables and to discuss the next steps.

    Outcomes

    Work with the appropriate management stakeholders to:

    1. Extract key business priorities
    2. Set your goals
    3. Agree on key terms and set the scope for your APM effort

    Work with your applications team to:

    1. Build a detailed inventory
    2. Identify areas of redundancy

    Work with the SMEs for a subset of applications to:

    1. Define your rationalization criteria, descriptions, and scoring
    2. Evaluate each application using rationalization criteria

    Work with application delivery specialists to:

    1. Determine the appropriate disposition for your apps
    2. Build an initial application portfolio roadmap
    3. Establish an ongoing cadence of APM activities

    Info-Tech analysts complete:

    1. Workshop report
    2. APM Snapshot and Foundations Toolset
    3. Action plan

    Note: The workshop will focus on a subset or group of applications depending on the state of your current APM inventory and available time. The goal is to use this first group to build your APM process and models to support your ongoing discovery, rationalization, and modernization efforts.

    Workshop Options

    Contact your account representative for more information.
    workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8889

    Outcomes

    1-Day Snapshot

    3-Day Snapshot and Foundations (Key Apps)

    4-Day Snapshot and Foundations (Pilot Area)

    APM Snapshot

    • Align applications to business capabilities
    • Evaluate application support for business capabilities

    APM Foundations

    • Define your APM program and cadence
    • Rationalize applications using weighted criteria
    • Define application dispositions
    • Build an application roadmap aligned to initiatives

    Establish APM practice with a small sample set of apps and capabilities.

    Establish APM practice with a pilot group of apps and capabilities.

    Blueprint Pre-Step: Get the right stakeholders to the right exercises

    The image contains four steps and demonstrates who should be handling each exercise. 1. Lay Your Foundations, is to be handled by the APM Lead/Owner and the Key Corporate Stakeholders. 2. Improve Your Inventory, is to be handled by the APM Lead/Owner and the Applications Subject Matter Experts. 3. Rationalize Your Apps, is to be handled by the APM Lead/Owner, the Applications Subject Matter Experts, and the Delivery Leads. 4. Populate Your Roadmap, is to be handled by the APM Lead/Owner, the Key Corporate Stakeholders, and the Delivery Leads.

    APM Lead/Owner (Recommended)

    ☐ Applications Lead or the individual responsible for application portfolio management, along with any applications team members, if available

    Key Corporate Stakeholders

    Depending on size and structure, participants could include:

    ☐ Head of IT (CIO, CTO, IT Director, or IT Manager)

    ☐ Head of shared services (CFO, COO, VP HR, etc.)

    ☐ Compliance Officer, Steering Committee

    ☐ Company owner or CEO

    Application Subject Matter Experts

    Individuals who have familiarity with a specific subset of applications

    ☐ Business owners (product owners, Head of Business Function, power users)

    ☐ Support owners (Operations Manager, IT Technician)

    Delivery Leads

    ☐ Development Managers

    ☐ Solution Architects

    ☐ Project Managers

    Understand your APM tools and outcomes

    1.Diagnostic The image contains a screenshot of the diagnostic APM tool.

    5. Foundations: Chart

    The image contains a screenshot of the Foundations: Chart APM tool.

    2. Data Journey

    The image contains a screenshot of the data journey APM tool.

    6. App Comparison

    The image contains a screenshot of the App Comparison APM tool.

    3. Snapshot

    The image contains a screenshot of the snapshot APM tool.

    7. Roadmap

    The image contains a screenshot of the Roadmap APM tool.

    4. Foundations: Results

    The image contains a screenshot of the Foundations: Results APM Tool.

    Examples and explanations of these tools are located on the following slides and within the phases where they occur.

    Assess your current application portfolio with Info-Tech’s APM Diagnostic Tool

    The image contains a screenshot of the APM Diagnostic Tool.

    One of the primary purposes of application portfolio management is to get what we know and need to know on paper so we can share a common vision and understanding of our portfolio. This enables better discussions and decisions with your application owners and stakeholders.

    APM worksheet data journey map

    The image contains a screenshot of the APM worksheet data journey map.

    Interpreting your APM Snapshot results

    The image contains a screenshot of the APM snapshots results.

    Interpreting your APM Foundations results

    The image contains a screenshot of the APM Foundations results.

    Interpreting your APM Foundations chart

    The image contains a screenshot of the APM Foundations chart.

    Compare application groups

    Group comparison can be used for more than just redundant/overlapping applications.

    The image contains a screenshot of images that demonstrate comparing application groups.

    Apply Info-Tech’s 6 R’s Rationalization Disposition Model

    The image contains a screenshot of Info-Tech's 6 R's Rationalization Disposition Model.

    Disposition

    Description

    Reward

    Prioritize new features or enhancement requests and openly welcome the expansion of these applications as new requests are presented.

    Refresh

    Address the poor end-user satisfaction with a prioritized project. Consult with users to determine if UX issues require improvement to address satisfaction.

    Refocus

    Determine the root cause of the low value. Refocus, retrain, or refresh the UX to improve value. If there is no value found, aim to "keep the lights on" until the app can be decommissioned.

    Replace

    Replace or rebuild the application as technical and user issues are putting important business capabilities at risk. Decommission application alongside replacement.

    Remediate

    Address the poor technical health or risk with a prioritized project. Further consult with development and technical teams to determine if migration or refactoring is suited to address the technical issue.

    Retire

    Cancel any requested features and enhancements. Schedule the proper decommission and transfer end users to a new or alternative system if necessary.

    TCO, compared relatively to business value, helps determine the practicality of a disposition and the urgency of any call to action. Application alignment is factored in when assessing redundancies and has a separate set of dispositions.

    Populate roadmap example

    The image contains an example of the populate roadmap.

    ARE YOU READY TO GET STARTED?

    Phase 1

    Lay Your Foundations

    Phase 1

    1.1 Assess Your Current Application Portfolio

    1.2 Determine Narrative

    1.3 Define Goals and Metrics

    1.4 Define Application Categories

    1.5 Determine APM Steps and Roles

    Phase 2

    2.1 Populate Your Inventory

    2.2 Align to Business Capabilities

    Phase 3

    3.1 Assess Business Value

    3.2 Assess Technical Health

    3.3 Assess End-User Perspective

    3.4 Assess Total Cost of Ownership

    Phase 4

    4.1 Review APM Snapshot Results

    4.2 Review APM Foundations Results

    4.3 Determine Dispositions

    4.4 Assess Redundancies (Optional)

    4.5 Determine Dispositions for Redundant Applications (Optional)

    4.6 Prioritize Initiatives

    4.7 Determine Ongoing APM Cadence

    This phase involves the following participants:

    Applications Lead

    Key Corporate Stakeholders

    Additional Resources

    APM supports many goals

    Building an APM process requires a proper understanding of the underlying business goals and objectives of your organization’s strategy. Effectively identifying these drivers is paramount to gaining buy-in and the approval for any changes you plan to make to your application portfolio.

    After identifying these goals, you will need to ensure they are built into the foundations of your APM process.

    “What is most critical?” but also “What must come first?”

    Discover

    Improve

    Transform

    Collect Inventory

    Uncover Shadow IT

    Uncover Redundancies

    Anticipate Upgrades

    Predict Retirement

    Reduce Cost

    Increase Efficiency

    Reduce Applications

    Eliminate Redundancy

    Limit Risk

    Improve Architecture

    Modernize

    Enable Scalability

    Drive Business Growth

    Improve UX

    Assess your current application portfolio with Info-Tech’s APM Diagnostic Tool

    The image contains a screenshot of the APM Diagnostic Tool.

    One of the primary purposes of application portfolio management is to get what we know and need to know on paper so we can share a common vision and understanding of our portfolio. This enables better discussions and decisions with your application owners and stakeholders.

    1.1 Assess your current application portfolio with Info-Tech’s diagnostic tool

    Estimated time: 1 hour

    1. This tool provides visibility into your application portfolio and APM practices.
    2. Based on your assessment, you should gain a better understanding of whether the appropriate next steps are in application discovery, rationalization, or roadmapping.
    3. Complete the “Data Entry” worksheet in the Application Portfolio Management Diagnostic Tool (Excel).
    4. Review the “Results” worksheet to help inform and guide your next steps.

    Download the Application Portfolio Management Diagnostic Tool

    Input Output
    • Current APM program
    • Application landscape
    • APM current-state assessment
    Materials Participants
    • Application Portfolio Management Diagnostic Tool
    • Applications Lead

    1.1 Understanding the diagnostic results

    • Managed Apps are your known knowns and most of your portfolio.
    • Unmanaged and Unsanctioned Apps are known but have unknown risks and compliance. Bring these under IT support.
    • Unknown Apps are high risk and noncompliant. Prioritize these based on risk, cost, and use.
    The image contains a screenshot of the diagnostic APM tool.
    • APM is more than an inventory and assessment. A strong APM program provides ongoing visibility and insights to drive application improvement and value delivery.
    • Use your Sprawl Factors to identify process and organizational gaps that may need to be addressed.
    • Your APM inventory is only as good as the information in it. Use this chart to identify gaps and develop a path to define missing information.
    • APM is an iterative process. Use this state assessment to determine where to focus most of your current effort.

    Understand potential motivations for APM

    The value of APM is defined by how the information will be used to drive better decisions.

    Portfolio Governance

    Transformative Initiatives

    Event-Driven Rationalization

    Improves:

    • Spending efficiency
    • Risk
    • Retirement of aged and low-value applications
    • Business enablement

    Impact on your rationalization framework:

    • Less urgent
    • As rigorous as appropriate
    • Apply in-depth analysis as needed

    Enables:

    • Data migration or harmonization
    • Legacy modernization
    • Infrastructure/cloud migration
    • Standardizing platforms
    • Shift to cloud and SAAS

    Impact on your rationalization framework:

    • Time sensitive
    • Scope on impacted areas
    • Need to determine specific dispositions
    • Outcomes need to include detailed and actionable steps

    Responds to:

    • Mergers and acquisitions
    • Regulatory and compliance change
    • New applications
    • Application retirement by vendors
    • Changes in business operations
    • Security risks and BC/DR

    Impact on your rationalization framework:

    • Time constrained
    • Lots of discovery work
    • Primary focus on duplication
    • Increased process and system understanding

    Different motivations will influence the appropriate approach to and urgency of APM or, specifically, rationalizing the portfolio. When rationalizing is directly related to enabling or in response to a broader initiative, you will need to create a more structured approach with a formal budget and resources.

    1.2 Determine narrative

    Estimated time: 30 minutes-2 hours

    1. Open the “Narrative” tab in the APM Snapshot and Foundations Tool.
    2. Start by listing your prevailing IT pain points with the application portfolio. These will be the issues experienced predominantly by the IT team and not necessarily by the stakeholders. Be sure to distinguish pain points from their root causes.
    3. Determine an equivalent business pain point for each IT pain point. This should be how the problem manifests itself to business stakeholders and should include potential risks to the organization is exposed to.
    4. Determine the business goal for each business pain point. Ideally, these are established organizational goals that key decision-makers will recognize. These goals should address the business pain points you have documented.
    5. Determine the technical objective for each business goal. These speak to the general corrections or enhancements to the portfolio required to accomplish the business goals.
    6. Use the “Narrative - Matrix” worksheet to group items into themes if needed.

    Record the results in the APM Snapshot and Foundations Tool

    Input Output
    • Familiarity with application landscape
    • Organizational context and strategic artifacts
    • Narrative for application portfolio transformation
    Materials Participants
    • APM Snapshot and Foundations Tool
    • Application Portfolio Manager

    Connect your pains to what the business cares about to find the most effective narrative

    Root Cause

    IT Pain Points

    Business Pain Points

    Business Goals

    Narrative

    Technical Objectives

    Sprawl

    Shadow IT/decentralized oversight

    Neglect over time

    Poor delivery processes

    Back-End Complexity

    Disparate Data/Apps

    Poor Architectural Fit

    Redundancy

    Maintenance Demand/
    Resource Drain

    Low Maintainability

    Technical Debt

    Legacy, Aging, or Expiring Apps

    Security Vulnerabilities

    Unsatisfied Customers

    Hurdles to Growth/Change

    Poor Business Analytics

    Process Inefficiency

    Software Costs

    Business Continuity Risk

    Data Privacy Risk

    Data/IP Theft Risk

    Poor User Experience

    Low-Value Apps

    Scalability

    Flexibility/Agility

    Data-Driven Insights

    M&A Transition

    Business Unit Consolidation/ Centralization

    Process Improvement

    Process Modernization

    Cost Reduction

    Stability

    Customer Protection

    Security

    Employee Enablement

    Business Enablement

    Innovation

    Create Strategic Alignment

    Identify specific business capabilities that are incompatible with strategic initiatives.

    Reduce Application Intensity

    Highlight the capabilities that are encumbered due to functional overlaps and complexity.

    Reduce Software Costs

    Specific business capabilities come at an unnecessarily or disproportionately high cost.

    Mitigate Business Continuity Risk

    Specific business capabilities are at risk of interruption or stoppages due to unresolved back-end issues.

    Mitigate Security Risk

    Specific business capabilities are at risk due to unmitigated security vulnerabilities or breaches.

    Increase Satisfaction Applications

    Specific business capabilities are not achieving their optimal business value.

    Platform Standardization

    Platform Standardization Consolidation

    Data Harmonization

    Removal/Consolidation of Redundant Applications

    Legacy Modernization

    Application Upgrades

    Removal of Low-Value Applications

    1.3 Define goals and metrics

    Estimated time: 1 hour

    1. Determine the motivations behind APM. You may want to collect and review any of the organization’s strategic documents that provide additional context on previously established goals.
    2. With the appropriate stakeholders, discuss the goals of APM. Try to label your goals as either:
      1. Short term: Refers to immediate goals used to represent the progress of APM activities. Likely these goals are more IT-oriented
      2. Long term: Refers to broader and more distant goals more related to the impact of APM. These goals tend to be more business-oriented.
    3. To help clearly define your goals, discuss appropriate metrics for each goal. Often these metrics can be expressed as:
      1. Leading indicators: Metrics used to gauge the success of your short-term goals and the progress of APM activities.
      2. Lagging indicators: Metrics used to gauge the success of your long-term goals.

    Record the results in the APM Snapshot and Foundations Tool

    Input Output
    • Overarching organizational strategy
    • IT strategy
    • Defined goals and metrics for APM
    Materials Participants
    • Whiteboard
    • Markers
    • APM Snapshot and Foundations Tool
    • Applications Lead
    • Key Corporate Stakeholders

    1.3 Define goals and metrics: Example

    Goals

    Metric

    Target

    Short Term

    Improve ability to inform the business

    Leading Indicators

    • Application inventory with all data fields completed
    • Applications with recommended dispositions
    • 80% of portfolio

    Improve ownership of applications

    • Applications with an assigned business and technical owner
    • 80% of portfolio

    Reduce costs of portfolio

    • TCO of full application portfolio
    • The number of recovered/avoided software licenses from retired apps
    • Reduce by 5%
    • $50,000

    Long Term

    Migrate platform

    Lagging Indicators

    • Migrate all applications
    • Total value change in on-premises apps switched to SaaS
    • 100% of applications
    • Increase 50%

    Improve overall satisfaction with portfolio

    • End-user satisfaction rating
    • Increase 25%

    Become more customer-centric

    • Increased sales
    • Increased customer experience
    • Increase 35%

    “Application” doesn’t have the same meaning to everyone

    The image contains a picture of Martin Fowler.

    Code: A body of code that's seen by developers as a single unit.

    Functionality: A group of functionality that business customers see as a single unit.

    Funding: An initiative that those with the money see as a single budget.

    ?: What else?

    “Essentially applications are social constructions.

    Source: Martin Fowler

    APM focuses on business applications.

    “Software used by business users to perform a business function.”

    – ServiceNow, 2020

    Unfortunately, that definition is still quite vague.

    You must set boundaries and scope for “application”

    1. Many individual items can be considered applications on their own or components within or associated with an application.

    2. Different categories of applications may be out of scope or handled differently within the activities and artifacts of APM.

    Different categories of applications may be out of scope or handled differently within the activities and artifacts of APM.

    • Interface
    • Software Component
    • Supporting Software
    • Platform
    • Presentation Layer
    • Middleware
    • Micro Service
    • Database
    • UI
    • API
    • Data Access/ Transfer/Load
    • Operating System

    Apps can be categorized by generic categories

    • Enterprise Applications
    • Unique Function-Specific Applications
    • Productivity Tools
    • Customer-Facing Applications
    • Mobile Applications

    Apps can be categorized by bought vs. built or install types

    • Custom
    • On-Prem
    • Off the Shelf
    • SaaS
    • Hybrid
    • End-User-Built Tools

    Apps can be categorized by the application family

    • Parent Application
    • Child Application
    • Package
    • Module
    • Suite
    • Component (Functional)

    Apps can be categorized by the group managing them

    • IT-Managed Applications
    • Business-Managed Applications (Shadow IT)
    • Partner/External Applications

    Apps can be categorized by tiers

    • Mission Critical
    • Tier 2
    • Tier 3

    Set boundaries on what is an application or the individual unit that you’re making business decisions on. Also, determine which categories of applications are in scope and how they will be included in the activities and artifacts of APM. Use your product families defined in Deliver Digital Products at Scale to help define your application categories, groups, and boundaries.

    1.4 Define application categories

    Estimated time: 1 hour

    1. Review the items listed on the previous slide and consider what categories provide the best initial grouping to help organize your rationalization and dispositions. Update the category list to match your application groupings.
    2. Identify the additional categories you need to manage in your application portfolio.
    3. For each category, establish or modify a description or definition and provide examples that exist in your current portfolio.
    4. For each category, answer:
      1. Will these be documented in the application inventory?
      2. Will these be included in application rationalization? Think about if this item will be assigned a TCO, value score, and, ultimately, a disposition.
      3. Will these be listed in the application portfolio roadmap?
    5. If you completed Deliver Digital Products at Scale, use your product families to help define your application categories.

    Record the results in the APM Snapshot and Foundations Tool

    InputOutput
    • Working list of applications
    • Definitions and guidelines for which application categories are in scope for APM
    MaterialsParticipants
    • Whiteboard and markers
    • APM Snapshot and Foundations Tool
    • Applications Lead
    • Key Corporate Stakeholders

    1.4 APM worksheet data journey map

    The image contains a screenshot of the APM worksheet data journey map.

    1.4 Define application categories: Example

    Category

    Definition/Description

    Examples

    Documented in your application inventory?

    Included in application rationalization?

    Listed in your application portfolio roadmap?

    Business Application

    End-user facing applications that directly enable specific business functions. This includes enterprise-wide and business-function-specific applications. Separate modules will be considered a business application when appropriate.

    ERP system, CRM software, accounting software

    Yes

    Yes. Unless currently in dev. TCO of the parent application will be divided among child apps.

    Yes

    Software Components

    Back-end solutions are self-contained units that support business functions.

    ETL, middleware, operating systems

    No. Documentation in CMDB. These will be listed as a dependency in the application inventory.

    No. These will be linked to a business app and included in TCO estimates and tech health assessments.

    No

    Productivity Tools

    End-user-facing applications that enable standard communication of general document creation.

    MS Word, MS Excel, corporate email

    Yes

    No

    Yes

    End-User- Built Microsoft Tools

    Single instances of a Microsoft tool that the business has grown dependent on.

    Payroll Excel tool, Access databases

    No. Documentation in Business Tool Glossary.

    No No

    Partner Applications

    Partners or third-party applications that the business has grown dependent on but are internally owned or managed.

    Supplier’s ERP portal, government portal

    No No

    Yes

    Shadow IT

    Business-managed applications.

    Downloaded tools

    Yes

    Yes. However, just from a redundancy perspective.

    Yes

    The roles in APM rarely exist; you need to adapt

    Application Portfolio Manager

    • Responsible for the health and evolution of the application portfolio.
    • Facilitates the rationalization process.
    • Compiles and assesses application information and recommends and supports key decisions regarding the direction of the applications.
    • This is rarely a dedicated role even in large enterprises. For small enterprises, this should be an IT employee at a manager level – an IT manager or operations manager.

    Business Owner

    • Responsible for managing individual applications on a functional level and approves and prioritizes projects.
    • Provides business process or functional subject matter expertise for the assessment of applications.
    • For small enterprises, this role is rarely defined, but the responsibility should exist. Consider the head of a business unit or a process owner as the owner of the application.

    Support Owner

    • Responsible for the maintenance and management of individual applications.
    • Provides technical information and subject matter expertise for the assessment of an application.
    • For small enterprises, this would be those responsible for maintaining the application and those responsible for its initial implementation. Often support responsibilities are external, and this role will be more of a vendor manager.

    Project Portfolio Manager

    • Responsible for intake, planning, and coordinating the resources that deliver any changes.
    • The body that consumes the results of rationalization and begins planning any required action or project.
    • For small enterprises, the approval process can come from a steering committee but it is often less formal. Often a smaller group of project managers facilitates planning and coordination and works closely with the delivery leads.

    Corner-of-the-Desk Approach

    • No one is explicitly dedicated to building a strategy or APM practices.
    • Information is collected whenever the applications team has time available.
    • Benefits are pushed out and the value is lost.

    Dedicated Approach

    • The initiative is given a budget and formal agenda.
    • Roles and responsibilities are assigned to team members.

    The high-level steps of APM present some questions you need to answer

    Build Inventory

    Create the full list of applications and capture all necessary attributes.

    • Who will build the inventory?
    • Do you know all your applications (Shadow IT)?
    • Do you know your applications’ functionality?
    • Do you know where your applications overlap?
    • Who do you need to consult with to fill in the gaps?
    • Who will provide specific application information?

    Collect & Compile

    Engage with appropriate SMEs and collect necessary data points for rationalization.

    • Who will collect and compile the data points for rationalization?
    • What are the specific data points?
    • Are some of the data points currently documented?
    • Who will provide specific data points on technical health, cost, performance, and business value?
    • Who will determine what business value is?

    Assess & Recommend

    Apply rationalization framework and toolset to determine dispositions.

    • Who will apply a rationalization tool or decision-making framework to generate dispositions for the applications?
    • Who will modify the tool or framework to ensure results align to the goals of the organization?
    • Who will define any actions or projects that result from the rationalization? And who needs to be consulted to assess the feasibility of any potential project?

    Validate & Roadmap

    Present dispositions for validation and communicate any decisions or direction for applications.

    • Who will present the recommended disposition, corrective action, or new project to the appropriate decision maker?
    • Who is the appropriate decision maker for application changes or project approval?
    • What format is recommended (idea, proposal, business case) and what extra analysis is required?
    • Who needs to be consulted regarding the potential changes?

    1.5 Determine APM steps and roles (SIPOC)

    Estimated time: 1-2 hours

    1. Begin by comparing Info-Tech’s list of common APM roles to the roles that exist in your organization with respect to application management and ownership.
    2. There are four high-level steps for APM: build inventory, collect & compile, assess & recommend, and validate & roadmap. Apply the SIPOC (Supplier, Input, Process, Output, Customer) model by completing the following for each step:
      1. In the Process column, modify the description, if necessary. Identify who is responsible for performing the step.
      2. In the Inputs column, modify the list of inputs.
      3. In the Suppliers column, identify who must be included to provide the inputs.
      4. In the Outputs column, modify the list of outputs.
      5. In the Customers column, identify who consumes the outputs.
    3. (Optional) Outline how the results of APM will be consumed. For example, project intake or execution, data or platform migration, application or product management, or whichever is appropriate.

    Record the results in the APM Snapshot and Foundations Tool

    Input Output
    • Existing function and roles regarding application delivery, management, and ownership
    • Scope of APM
    • Responsibilities assigned to your roles
    Materials Participants
    • Whiteboard and markers
    • “Supporting Activities – SIPOC” worksheet in the APM Snapshot and Foundations Tool
    • Applications Lead
    • Key Corporate Stakeholders

    1.5 Determine steps and roles

    Suppliers

    Inputs

    Process

    Outputs

    Customers

    • Applications Manager
    • Operations Manager
    • Business Owners
    • IT Team
    • List of applications
    • Application attributes
    • Business capabilities

    Build Inventory

    Create the full list of applications and capture all necessary attributes.

    Resp: Applications Manager & IT team member

    • Application inventory
    • Identified redundancies
    • Whole organization
    • Applications SMEs
    • Business Owners
    • Support Owners & Team
    • End Users
    • Application inventory
    • Existing documentation
    • Additional collection methods
    • Knowledge of business value, cost, and performance for each application

    Collect & Compile

    Engage with appropriate SMEs and collect necessary data points for rationalization.

    Resp: IT team member

    • Data points of business value, cost, and performance for each application
    • Applications Manager
    • Applications Manager
    • Defined application rationalization framework and toolset
    • Data points of business value, cost, and performance for each application

    Assess & Recommend

    Apply rationalization framework and toolset to determine dispositions.

    Resp: Applications Manager

    • Assigned disposition for each application
    • New project ideas for applications
    • Business Owners
    • Steering Committee
    • Business Owners
    • Steering Committee
    • Assigned disposition for each application
    • New project ideas for applications
    • Awareness of goals and priorities
    • Awareness of existing projects and resources capacity

    Validate & Roadmap

    Present dispositions for validation and communicate any decisions or direction for applications.

    Resp: Applications Manager

    • Application portfolio roadmap
    • Confirmed disposition for each application
    • Project request submission
    • Whole organization
    • Applications Manager
    • Solutions Engineer
    • Business Owner
    • Project request submission
    • Estimated cost
    • Estimated value or ROI

    Project Intake

    Build business case for project request.

    Resp: Project Manager

    • Approved project
    • Steering Committee

    Planning your APM modernization journey steps

    Discovery Rationalization Disposition Roadmap

    Enter your pilot inventory.

    • Optional Snapshot: Populate your desired snapshot grouping lists (departments, functions, groups, capabilities, etc.).

    Score your pilot apps to refine your rationalization criteria and scoring.

    • Score 3 to 9 apps to adjust and get comfortable with the scoring.
    • Validate scoring with the remaining apps in your pilot group. Refine and finalize the criteria and scoring descriptions.
    • Optional Snapshot: Use the Group Alignment Matrix to match your grouping list to select which apps support each grouping item.

    Determine recommended disposition for each application.

    • Review and adjust the disposition recommendations on the “Disposition Options” worksheet and set your pass/fail threshold.
    • Review your apps on the “App Rationalization Results” worksheet. Update (override) the recommended disposition and priority if needed.

    Populate your application roadmap.

    • Indicate programs, projects, initiatives, or releases that are planned for each app.
    • Update the priority based on the initiative.
    • Use the visual roadmap to show high-level delivery phases.

    Phase 2

    Improve Your Inventory

    Phase 1

    1.1 Assess Your Current Application Portfolio

    1.2 Determine Narrative

    1.3 Define Goals and Metrics

    1.4 Define Application Categories

    1.5 Determine APM Steps and Roles

    Phase 2

    2.1 Populate Your Inventory

    2.2 Align to Business Capabilities

    Phase 3

    3.1 Assess Business Value

    3.2 Assess Technical Health

    3.3 Assess End-User Perspective

    3.4 Assess Total Cost of Ownership

    Phase 4

    4.1 Review APM Snapshot Results

    4.2 Review APM Foundations Results

    4.3 Determine Dispositions

    4.4 Assess Redundancies (Optional)

    4.5 Determine Dispositions for Redundant Applications (Optional)

    4.6 Prioritize Initiatives

    4.7 Determine Ongoing APM Cadence

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • Applications Lead
    • Applications Team

    Additional Resources

    Document Your Business Architecture

    Industry Reference Architectures

    Application Capability Template

    Pre-step: Collect your applications

    1. Consult with your IT team and leverage any existing documentation to gather an initial list of your applications.
    2. Build an initial working list of applications. This is just meant to be a starting point. Aim to include any new applications in procurement, implementation, or development.
    3. The rationalization and roadmapping phases are best completed when iteratively focusing on manageable groups of applications. Group your applications into subsets based on shared subject matter experts. Likely this will mean grouping applications by business units.
    4. Select a subset to be the first group of applications that will undergo the activities of rationalization and roadmapping to refine your APM processes, scoring, and disposition selection.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    The more information you plan to capture, the larger the time and effort, especially as you move along toward advanced and strategic items. Capture the information most aligned to your objectives to make the most of your investment.

    If you completed Deliver Digital Products at Scale, use your product families and products to help define your applications.

    Learn more about automated application discovery:
    High Application Satisfaction Starts With Discovering Your Application Inventory

    Discover your applications

    The image contains a screenshot of examples of applications that support APM.

    2.1 Populate your inventory

    Estimated time: 1-4 hours per group

    1. Review Info-Tech’s list of application inventory attributes.
    2. Open the “Application Inventory Details” tab of the APM Snapshot and Foundations Tool. Modify, add, or omit attributes.
    3. For each application, populate your prioritized data fields or any fields you know at the time of discovery. You will complete all the fields in future iterations.
    4. Complete this the best you can based on your team’s familiarity and any readily available documentation related to these applications.
    5. Use the drop-down list to select Enabling, Redundant/Overlapping, and Dependent apps. This will be used to help determine dispositions and comparisons.
    6. Highlight missing information or placeholder values that need to be verified.

    Record the results in the APM Snapshot and Foundations Tool

    Input Output
    • Working list of applications
    • Determined attributes for inventory
    • Populated inventory
    Materials Participants
    • APM Snapshot and Foundations Tool
    • Applications Lead
    • Any Applications Team Members

    2.1 APM worksheet data journey map

    The image contains a screenshot of the APM worksheet data journey map.

    Why is the business capability so important?

    For the purposes of an inventory, business capabilities help all stakeholders gain a sense of the functionality the application provides.

    However, the true value of business capability comes with rationalization.

    Upon linking all the organization’s applications to a standardized and consistent set of business capabilities, you can then group your applications based on similar, complementary, or overlapping functionality. In other words, find your redundancies and consolidation opportunities.

    Important Consideration

    Defining business capabilities and determining the full extent of redundancy is a challenging undertaking and often is a larger effort than APM all together.

    Business capabilities should be defined according to the unique functions and language of your organization, at varying levels of granularity, and ideally including target-state capabilities that identify gaps in the future strategy.

    This blueprint provides a simplified and generic list for the purpose of categorizing similar functionality. We strongly encourage exploring Document Your Business Architecture to help in the business capability defining process, especially when visibility into your portfolio and knowledge of redundancies is poor.

    The image contains a screenshot of the business capability scenarios.

    For a more detailed capability mapping, use the Application Portfolio Snapshot and the worksheets in your current workbook.

    What is a business capability map?

    The image contains a screenshot of a business capability map.

    A business capability map (BCM) is an abstraction of business operations that helps describe what the enterprise does to achieve its vision, mission, and goals. Business capabilities are the building blocks of the enterprise. They are typically defined at varying levels of granularity and include target-state capabilities that identify gaps in the future strategy. These are the people, process, and tool units that deliver value to your teams and customers.

    Info-Tech’s Industry Coverage and Reference Architectures give you a head start on producing a BCM fit for your organization. The visual to the left is an example of a reference architecture for the retail industry.

    These are the foundational piece for our Application Portfolio Snapshot. By linking capabilities to your supporting applications, you can better visualize how the portfolio supports the organization at a single glance. More specifically, you can highlight how issues with the portfolio are impacting capability delivery.

    Reminder: Best practices imply that business capabilities are methodologically defined by business stakeholders and business architects to capture the unique functions and language of your organization.

    The approach laid out in this service is about applying minimal time and effort to make the case for proper investment into the best practices, which can include creating a tailored BCM. Start with a good enough example to produce a useful visual and generate a positive conversation toward resourcing and analyses.

    We strongly encourage exploring Document Your Business Architecture and the Application Portfolio Snapshot to understand the thorough methods and tactics for BCM.

    Why perform a high-level application alignment before rationalization?

    Having to address redundancy complicates the application rationalization process. There is no doubt that assessing applications in isolation is much easier and allows you to arrive at dispositions for your applications in a timelier manner.

    Rationalization has two basic steps: first, collect and compile information, and second, analyze that information and determine a disposition for each application. When you don’t have redundancy, you can analyze an application and determine a disposition in isolation. When you do have redundancies, you need to collect information for multiple applications, likely across departments or lines of business, then perform a comparative analysis.

    Most likely your approach will fall somewhere between the examples below and require a hybrid approach.

    Benefits of a high-level application alignment:

    • Review the degree of redundancy across your portfolio.
    • Understand the priority areas for rationalization and the sequence of information collection.

    The image contains a screenshot of a timeline of rationalization effort.

    2.2 Align apps to capabilities and functions

    Estimated time: 1-4 hours per grouping

    The APM tool provides up to three different grouping comparisons to assess how well your applications are supporting your enterprise. Although business capabilities are important, identify your organizational perspectives to determine how well your portfolio supports these functions, departments, or value streams. Each grouping should be a consistent category, type, or arrangement of applications.

    1. Enter the business capabilities, from either your own BCM or the Info-Tech reference architectures, into the Business Capability column under Grouping 1.
    2. Open the “Group 1 Alignment Matrix” worksheet in the APM Snapshot and Foundations Tool.
    3. For each application’s row, enter an “X” in the column of a capability that the application supports.
    4. Optionally, repeat these steps under Grouping 2 and 3 for each value stream, department, function, or business unit where you’d like to assess application support. Note: To use Grouping 3, unhide the columns on the “Application and Group Lists” worksheet and unhide the worksheet “Grouping 3 Alignment Matrix.”

    Record the results in the APM Snapshot and Foundations Tool

    InputOutput
    • Application inventory
    • List of business capabilities, Info-Tech Reference Architecture capabilities, departments, functions, divisions, or value streams for grouping comparison
    • Assigned business capabilities to applications
    MaterialsParticipants
    • Whiteboard and markers
    • APM Snapshot and Foundations Tool
    • Applications Lead
    • Any Applications Team Members

    2.2 APM worksheet data journey map

    The image contains a screenshot of the APM worksheet data journey map.

    2.2 Aligning applications to groups example

    Alignment Matrix: Identify applications supporting each capability or function.

    Capability, Department, or Function 1

    Capability, Department, or Function 2

    Capability, Department, or Function 3

    Capability, Department, or Function 4

    Capability, Department, or Function 5

    Capability, Department, or Function 6

    Application A

    x

    Application B

    x

    Application C

    x

    Application D

    x

    Application E

    x x

    Application F

    x

    Application G

    x

    Application H

    x

    Application I

    x

    Application J

    x

    In this example:

    BC 1 is supported by App A

    BC 2 is supported by App B

    BC 3 is supported by Apps C & D

    BCs 4 & 5 are supported by App E

    BC 6 is supported by Apps F-G. BC 6 shows an example of potential redundancy and portfolio complexity.

    The APM tool supports three different Snapshot groupings. Repeat this exercise for each grouping.

    Align application to capabilities – tool view

    The image contains screenshots of the align application to capabilities - tool view

    Phase 3

    Rationalize Your Applications

    Phase 1

    1.1 Assess Your Current Application Portfolio

    1.2 Determine Narrative

    1.3 Define Goals and Metrics

    1.4 Define Application Categories

    1.5 Determine APM Steps and Roles

    Phase 2

    2.1 Populate Your Inventory

    2.2 Align to Business Capabilities

    Phase 3

    3.1 Assess Business Value

    3.2 Assess Technical Health

    3.3 Assess End-User Perspective

    3.4 Assess Total Cost of Ownership

    Phase 4

    4.1 Review APM Snapshot Results

    4.2 Review APM Foundations Results

    4.3 Determine Dispositions

    4.4 Assess Redundancies (Optional)

    4.5 Determine Dispositions for Redundant Applications (Optional)

    4.6 Prioritize Initiatives

    4.7 Determine Ongoing APM Cadence

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • Applications Lead
    • Application SMEs

    Additional Resources

    Phase pre-step: Sequence rationalization assessments appropriately

    Use the APM Snapshot results to determine APM iterations

    • Application rationalization requires an iterative approach.
    • Review your application types and alignment from Phase 2 to begin to identify areas of overlapping or redundant applications.
    • Sequence the activities of Phase 3 based on whether you have a:
      • Redundant Portfolio
        • Use the APM Snapshot to prioritize analysis by grouping.
        • Complete the application functional analysis.
        • Use the “Application Comparison” worksheet to aid your comparison of application subsets.
        • Update application dispositions and roadmap initiatives.
      • Non-Redundant Portfolio
        • Use the APM Snapshot to prioritize analysis by grouping.
        • Update application dispositions and roadmap initiatives.

    The image contains a screenshot of a timeline of rationalization effort.

    Phase pre-step: Are the right stakeholders present?

    Make sure you have the right people at the table from the beginning.

    • Application rationalization requires specific stakeholders to provide specific data points.
    • Ensure your application subsets are grouped by shared subject matter experts. Ideally, these are grouped by business units.
    • For each subset, identify the appropriate SMEs for the five areas of rationalization criteria.
    • Communicate and schedule interviews with groups of stakeholders. Inform them of additional information sources to have readily available.
    • (Optional) This phase’s activities follow the clockwise sequence of the diagram to the right. Reorder the sequence of activities based on overlaps of availability in subject matter expertise.

    Application

    Rationalization

    Additional Information Sources

    Ideal Stakeholders

    • KPIs

    Business Value

    • Business Application/Product Owners
    • Business Unit/ Process Owners
    • Survey Results

    End User

    • Business Application/ Product Owners
    • Key/Power Users
    • End Users
    • General Ledger
    • Service Desk
    • Vendor Contracts

    TCO

    • Operations/Maintenance Manager
    • Vendor Managers
    • Finance & Acct.
    • Service Desk
    • ALM Tools

    Technical Health

    • Operations/ Maintenance Manager
    • Solution Architect
    • Security Manager
    • Dev. Manager
    • Capability Maps
    • Process Maps

    Application Alignment

    • Business Unit/ Process Owners

    Rationalize your applications

    The image contains screenshots of diagrams that reviews building your APM journey map.

    One of the principal goals of application rationalization is determining dispositions

    Disposition: The intended strategic direction or course of action for an application.

    Directionless portfolio of applications

    Assigned dispositions for individual apps

    High-level examples:

    The image contains a screenshot of an image that demonstrates a directionless portfolio of applications.

    Maintain: Keep the application but adjust its support structure.

    The image contains screenshots of a few images taken from the directionless application to demonstrate the text above.

    Modernize: Create a new project to address an inadequacy.

    The image contains screenshots of a few images taken from the directionless application to demonstrate the text above.

    Consolidate: Create a new project to reduce duplicate functionality.

    The image contains screenshots of a few images taken from the directionless application to demonstrate the text above.

    Retire: Phase out the application.

    The image contains screenshots of a few images taken from the directionless application to demonstrate the text above.

    Application rationalization provides insight

    Directionless portfolio of applications

    Info-Tech’s Five Lens Model

    Assigned dispositions for individual apps

    The image contains a screenshot of an example of directionless portfolio of applications.

    Application Alignment

    Business Value

    Technical Health

    End-User Perspective

    Total Cost of Ownership (TCO)

    Maintain: Keep the application but adjust its support structure.

    Modernize: Create a new initiative to address an inadequacy.

    Consolidate: Create a new initiative to reduce duplicate functionality.

    Retire: Phase out the application.

    Disposition: The intended strategic direction or implied course of action for an application.

    How well do your apps support your core functions and teams?

    How well are your apps aligned to value delivery?

    Do your apps meet all IT quality standards and policies?

    How well do your apps meet your end users’ needs?

    What is the relative cost of ownership and operation of your apps?

    Application rationalization requires the collection of several data points that represent these perspectives and act as the criteria for determining a disposition for each of your applications.

    Disposition: The intended strategic direction or implied course of action for an application.

    3.1-3.4 APM worksheet data journey map

    The image contains a screenshot of the APM worksheet data journey map.

    Assessing application business value

    The Business Business Value of Applications IT
    Keepers of the organization’s mission, vision, and value statements that define IT success. The business maintains the overall ownership and evaluation of the applications. Technical subject matter experts of the applications they deliver and maintain. Each IT function works together to ensure quality applications are delivered to stakeholder expectations.

    First, the authorities on business value need to define and weigh their value drivers that describe the priorities of the organization.

    This will then allow the applications team to apply a consistent, objective, and strategically aligned evaluation of applications across the organization.

    In this context…business value is the value of the business outcome that the application produces and how effective the application is at producing that outcome.

    Business value IS NOT the user’s experience or satisfaction with the application.

    Review the value drivers of your applications

    The image contains a screenshot of a the business value matrix.

    Financial vs. Human Benefits

    Financial benefits refer to the degree to which the value source can be measured through monetary metrics and are often quite tangible.

    Human benefits refer to how an application can deliver value through a user’s experience.

    Inward vs. Outward Orientation

    Inward orientation refers to value sources that have an internal impact and improve your organization’s effectiveness and efficiency in performing its operations.

    Outward orientation refers to value sources that come from your interaction with external factors, such as the market or your customers.

    Increased Revenue

    Reduced Costs

    Enhanced Services

    Reach Customers

    Application functions that are specifically related to the impact on your organization’s ability to generate revenue and deliver value to your customers.

    Reduction of overhead. The ways in which an application limits the operational costs of business functions.

    Functions that enable business capabilities that improve the organization’s ability to perform its internal operations.

    Application functions that enable and improve the interaction with customers or produce market information and insights.

    3.1 Assess business value

    Estimated time: 1 -4 hours

    1. Review Info-Tech’s four quadrants of business value: increase revenue/value, reduce costs, enhance services, and reach customers. Edit your value drivers, description, and scoring on the “Rationalization Inputs” worksheet. For each value driver, update the key indicators specific to your organization’s priorities. When editing the scoring descriptions, keep only the one you are using.
    2. (Optional) Add an additional value driver if your organization has distinct value drivers (e.g. compliance, sustainability, innovation, and growth).
    3. For each application, score on a scale of 0 to 5 how impactful the application is for each value driver. Use the indicators set in Phase 1 to guide your scoring.
    4. For each value driver, adjust the criteria weighting to match its relative importance to the organization. Start with a balanced or low weighting. Adjust the weights to ensure that the category score matches your relative values and priorities.

    Record the results in the APM Snapshot and Foundations Tool

    InputOutput
    • Knowledge of organizational priorities
    • (Optional) Existing mission, vision, and value statements
    • Scoring scheme for assessing business value
    MaterialsParticipants
    • Whiteboard and markers
    • APM Snapshot and Foundations Tool
    • Applications Lead
    • Key Corporate Stakeholders

    3.1 Weigh value drivers: Example

    The image contains a screenshot example of the weigh value drivers.

    For additional support in implementing a balanced value framework, refer to Build a Value Measurement Framework.

    Understand the back end and technical health of your applications

    Technical health identifies the extent of technology risk to the organization.

    MAINTAINABILITY (RAS)

    RAS refers to an app’s reliability, availability, and serviceability. How often, how long, and how difficult is it for your resources to keep an app functioning, and what are the resulting continuity risks? This can include root causes of maintenance challenges.

    SECURITY

    Applications should be aligned and compliant with ALL security policies. Are there vulnerabilities or is there a history of security incidents? Remember that threats are often internal and non-malicious.

    ADAPTABILITY

    How easily can the app be enhanced or scaled to meet changes in business needs? Does the app fit within the business strategy?

    INTEROPERABILITY

    The degree to which an app is integrated with current systems. Apps require comprehensive technical planning and oversight to ensure they connect within the greater application architecture. Does the app fit within your enterprise architecture strategy?

    BUSINESS CONTINUITY/DISASTER RECOVERY

    The degree to which the application is compatible with business continuity/disaster recovery (BC/DR) policies and plans that are routinely tested and verified.

    Unfortunately, the business only cares about what they can see or experience. Rationalization is your opportunity to get risk on the business’ radar and gain buy-in for the necessary action.

    3.2 Assess technical health

    Estimated time: 1-4 hours

    1. Review Info-Tech’s suggested technical health criteria. Edit your criteria, descriptions, and scoring on the “Rationalization Inputs” worksheet. For each criterion, update the key indicators specific to your organization’s priorities.
    2. For each application, score on a scale of 1 to 5 on how impactful the application is for each criterion.
    3. For each criterion, adjust the weighting to match its relative importance to the organization. Start with a balanced or low weighting. Adjust the weights to ensure that the category score matches your relative values and priorities.
    InputOutput
    • Familiarity of technical health perspective for applications within this subset
    • Maintenance history, architectural models
    • Technical health scores for each application
    MaterialsParticipants
    • APM Snapshot and Foundations Tool
    • Technical SMEs
    • Applications Lead
    • Any Applications Team Members

    Record the results in the APM Snapshot and Foundations Tool

    End users provide valuable perspective

    Your end users are your best means of determining front-end issues.

    Data Quality

    To what degree do the end users find the data quality sufficient to perform their role and achieve their desired outcome?

    Effectiveness

    To what degree do the end users find the application effective for performing their role and desired outcome?

    Usability

    To what degree do the end users find the application reliable and easy to use to achieve their desired outcome?

    Satisfaction

    To what degree are end users satisfied with the features of this application?

    What else matters to you?

    Tune your criteria to match your values and priorities.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    When facing large user groups, do not make assumptions or use lengthy methods of collecting information. Use Info-Tech’s Application Portfolio Assessment to collect data by surveying your end users’ perspectives.

    3.3 Assess end-user perspective

    Estimated time: 1-4 hours

    1. Review Info-Tech’s suggested end-user perspective criteria. Edit your criteria, descriptions and scoring on the “Rationalization Inputs” worksheet. For each criterion, update the key indicators specific to your organization’s priorities.
    2. For each application, score on a scale of 1 to 5 on how impactful the application is for each criterion.
    3. For each criterion, adjust the weighting to match its relative importance to the organization. Start with a balanced or low weighting. Adjust the weights to ensure that the category score matches your relative values and priorities.
    InputOutput
    • Familiarity of end user’s perspective for applications within this subset
    • User satisfaction scores for each application
    MaterialsParticipants
    • APM Snapshot and Foundations Tool
    • Business Owners, Key Users
    • Applications Lead
    • Any Applications Team Members

    Record the results in the APM Snapshot and Foundations Tool

    Consider the spectrum of application cost

    An application’s cost extends past a vendor’s fee and even the application itself.

    LICENSING AND SUBSCRIPTIONS: Your recurring payments to a vendor.

    Many commercial off-the-shelf applications require a license on a per-user basis. Review contracts and determine costs by looking at per-user or fixed rates charged by the vendor.

    MAINTENANCE COSTS: Your internal spending to maintain an app.

    These are the additional costs to maintain an application such as support agreements, annual maintenance fees, or additional software or hosting expenses.

    INDIRECT COSTS: Miscellaneous expenses necessary for an app’s continued use.

    Expenses like end-user training, developer education, and admin are often neglected, but they are very real costs organizations pay regularly.

    RETURN ON INVESTMENT: Perceived value of the application related to its TCO.

    Some of our most valuable applications are the most expensive. ROI is an optional criterion to account for the value and importance of the application.

    Info-Tech Best Practice

    The TCO assessment is one area where what you are considering the ”application” matters quite a bit. An application’s peripherals or software components need to be considered in your estimates. For additional help calculating TCO, use the Application TCO Calculator from Build a Rationalization Framework.

    3.4 Assess total cost of ownership

    Estimated time: 1-4 hours

    1. Review Info-Tech’s suggested TCO criteria. Edit your criteria, descriptions, and scoring on the “Rationalization Inputs” worksheet. For each criterion, update the key indicators specific to your organization’s priorities.
    2. For each application, score on a scale of 1 to 5 on how impactful the application is for each criterion.
    3. For each criterion, adjust the weighting to match its relative importance to the organization. Start with a balanced or low weighting. Adjust the weights to ensure that the category score matches your relative values and priorities.
    InputOutput
    • Familiarity with the TCO for applications within this subset
    • Vendor contracts, maintenance history
    • TCO scores for each application
    MaterialsParticipants
    • APM Snapshot and Foundations Tool
    • Business Owners, Vendor Managers, Operations Managers
    • Applications Lead
    • Any Applications Team Members

    Record the results in the APM Snapshot and Foundations Tool

    Phase 4

    Populate Your Roadmap

    Phase 1

    1.1 Assess Your Current Application Portfolio

    1.2 Determine Narrative

    1.3 Define Goals and Metrics

    1.4 Define Application Categories

    1.5 Determine APM Steps and Roles

    Phase 2

    2.1 Populate Your Inventory

    2.2 Align to Business Capabilities

    Phase 3

    3.1 Assess Business Value

    3.2 Assess Technical Health

    3.3 Assess End-User Perspective

    3.4 Assess Total Cost of Ownership

    Phase 4

    4.1 Review APM Snapshot Results

    4.2 Review APM Foundations Results

    4.3 Determine Dispositions

    4.4 Assess Redundancies (Optional)

    4.5 Determine Dispositions for Redundant Applications (Optional)

    4.6 Prioritize Initiatives

    4.7 Determine Ongoing APM Cadence

    his phase involves the following participants:

    • Applications Lead
    • Delivery Leads

    Additional Resources

    Review your APM Snapshot

    The image contains a screenshot of examples of applications that support APM.

    4.1 Review your APM Snapshot results

    Estimated time: 1-2 hours

    1. The APM Snapshot provides a dashboard to support your APM program’s focus and as an input to demand planning. Unhide the “Group 3” worksheet if you completed the alignment matrix.
    2. For each grouping area, review the results to determine underperforming areas. Use this information to prioritize your application root cause analysis and demand planning. Use the key on the following slide to guide your analysis.
    3. Analysis guidance:
      1. Start with the quartile grouping to find areas scoring in Remediate or Critical Need and focus follow-up actions on these areas.
      2. Use the lens/category heat map to determine which lenses are underperforming. Use this to then look up the individual app scores supporting that group to identify application issues.
      3. Use the “Application Comparison” worksheet to select and compare applications for the group to make your review and comparison easier.
      4. Work with teams in the group to provide root cause analysis for low scores.
      5. Build a plan to address any apps not supported by IT.
    InputOutput
    • Application list
    • Application to Group mapping
    • Rationalization scores
    • Awareness of application support for each grouping

    Materials

    Participants
    • APM Snapshot and Foundations Tool
    • Business Owners
    • Applications Lead
    • Any Applications Team Members

    Record the results in the APM Snapshot and Foundations Tool

    Interpreting your APM Snapshot

    The image contains a screenshot of the APM Snapshot with guides on how to interpret it.

    4.1 APM worksheet data journey map

    The image contains a screenshot of the AMP worksheet data journey map.

    Review your APM rationalization results

    The image contains a screenshot of examples of applications that support APM.

    4.2 Review your APM Foundations results

    Estimated time: 1-2 hours

    The APM Foundations Results dashboard (“App Rationalization Results” worksheet) provides a detailed summary of your relative app scoring to serve as input to demand planning.

    1. For each grouping, review the results to determine underperforming app support. Use this information to prioritize your application root cause analysis using the individual criteria scores on the “Rationalization Inputs” worksheet.
    2. Use guidance on the following example slides to understand each area of the results.
    3. Any applications marked as N/A for evaluation will display N/A on the results worksheet and will not be displayed in the chart. You can still enter dispositions.
    4. Use the column filters to compare a subset of applications or use the “App Comparison” worksheet to maintain an ongoing view by grouping, redundancy, or category.
    5. Any applications marked as N/A for evaluation will display N/A on the results worksheet and will not be displayed in the chart. You can still enter dispositions.
    InputOutput
    • Application list
    • Rationalization scores
    • Application awareness
    MaterialsParticipants
    • APM Snapshot and Foundations Tool
    • Business Owners
    • Applications Lead
    • Any Applications Team Members

    Record the results in the APM Snapshot and Foundations Tool

    4.2 APM worksheet data journey map

    The image contains a screenshot of the AMP worksheet data journey map.

    Interpreting your APM Foundations results

    The image contains a screenshot of the APM Foundations results.

    Interpreting your APM Foundations chart

    The image contains a screenshot of the APM Foundations chart.

    Modernize your applications

    The image contains a screenshot of examples of applications that support APM.

    Apply Info-Tech’s 6 R’s Rationalization Disposition Model

    The image contains a screenshot of Info-Tech's 6 R's Rationalization Disposition Model.

    Disposition

    Description

    Reward

    Prioritize new features or enhancement requests and openly welcome the expansion of these applications as new requests are presented.

    Refresh

    Address the poor end-user satisfaction with a prioritized project. Consult with users to determine if UX issues require improvement to address satisfaction.

    Refocus

    Determine the root cause of the low value. Refocus, retrain, or refresh the UX to improve value. If there is no value found, aim to "keep the lights on" until the app can be decommissioned.

    Replace

    Replace or rebuild the application as technical and user issues are putting important business capabilities at risk. Decommission application alongside replacement.

    Remediate

    Address the poor technical health or risk with a prioritized project. Further consult with development and technical teams to determine if migration or refactoring is suited to address the technical issue.

    Retire

    Cancel any requested features and enhancements. Schedule the proper decommission and transfer end users to a new or alternative system if necessary.

    TCO, compared relatively to business value, helps determine the practicality of a disposition and the urgency of any call to action. Application alignment is factored in when assessing redundancies and has a separate set of dispositions.

    4.3 Determine dispositions

    Estimated time: 1-4 hours

    1. The Recommended Disposition and Priority fields are prepopulated from your scoring thresholds and options on the “Disposition Options” worksheet. You can update any individual application disposition or priority using the drop-down menu and it will populate your selection on the “Roadmap” worksheet.
    2. Question if that disposition is appropriate. Be sure to consider:
      1. TCO – cost should come into play for any decisions.
      2. Alignment to strategic goals set for the overarching organizational, IT, technology (infrastructure), or application portfolio.
      3. Existing organizational priorities or funded initiatives impacting the app.
    3. Some dispositions may imply a call to action, new project, or initiative. Ideate and/or discuss with the team any potential initiatives. You can use different dispositions and priorities on the “App Rationalization Results” and “Roadmap” worksheets.
    4. Note: Modify the list of dispositions on the “Disposition Options” worksheet as appropriate for your rationalization initiative. Any modifications to the Disposition column will be automatically updated in the “App Rationalization Results” and “Roadmap” worksheets.
    InputOutput
    • Rationalization results
    • Assigned dispositions for applications
    MaterialsParticipants
    • APM Snapshot and Foundations Tool
    • Business Owners
    • Applications Lead
    • Any Applications Team Members

    Record the results in the APM Snapshot and Foundations Tool

    4.3 APM worksheet data journey map

    The image contains a screenshot of the worksheet data journey map.

    Redundancies require a different analysis and set of dispositions

    Solving application redundancy is a lot more complicated than simply keeping one application and eliminating the others.

    First, you need to understand the extent of the redundancy. The applications may support the same capability, but do they offer the same functions? Determine which apps offer which functions within a capability. This means you cannot accurately arrive at a disposition until you have evaluated all applications.

    Next, you need to isolate the preferred system. This is completed by comparing the same data points collected for rationalization and the application alignment analysis. Cost and coverage of all necessary functions become the more important factors in this decision-making process.

    Lastly, for the non-preferred redundant applications you need to determine: What will you do with the users? What will you do with the data? And what can you do with the functionality (can the actual coding be merged onto a common platform)?

    Disposition

    Description & Additional Analysis

    Call to Action (Priority)

    Keep & Absorb

    Higher value, health satisfaction, and cost than alternatives

    These are the preferred apps to be kept. However, additional efforts are still required to migrate new users and data and potentially configure the app to new processes.

    Application or Process Initiative

    (Moderate)

    Shift & Retire

    Lower value, health satisfaction, and cost than alternatives

    These apps will be decommissioned alongside efforts to migrate users and data to the preferred system.

    *Confirm there are no unique and necessary features.

    Process Initiative & Decommission

    (Moderate)

    Merge

    Lower value, health satisfaction, and cost than alternatives but still has some necessary unique features

    These apps will be merged with the preferred system onto a common platform.

    *Determine the unique and necessary features.

    *Determine if the multiple applications are compatible for consolidation.

    Application Initiative

    (Moderate)

    Compare groups of applications

    The image contains a screenshot of examples of applications that support APM.

    4.4 Assess redundancies (optional)

    Estimated rime: 1 hour per group

    This exercise is best performed after aligning business capabilities to applications across the portfolio and identifying your areas of redundancy. At this stage, this is still an information collection exercise, and it will not yield a consolidation-based disposition until applied to all relevant applications. Lastly, this exercise may still be at too high a level to outline the full details of redundancy, but it is still vital information to collect and a starting point to determine which areas require more concentrated analysis.

    1. Determine which areas of redundancy or comparisons are desired. Duplicate the “App Comparison” worksheet for each grouping or comparison.
    2. Extend the comparison to better identify redundancy.
      1. For each area of redundancy, identify the high-level features. Aim to limit the features to ten, grouping smaller features if necessary. SoftwareReviews can be a resource for identifying common features.
      2. Label features using the MoSCoW model: must have, should have, could have, will not have.
      3. For each application, identify which features they support. You can use the grouping alignment matrix as a template for feature alignment comparison. Duplicate the worksheet, unlock it, and replace the grouping cell references with your list of features.
    Input Output
    • Areas of redundancy
    • Familiarity with features for applications within this subset
    • Feature-level review of application redundancy
    Materials Participants
    • Whiteboard and markers
    • APM Snapshot and Foundations Tool
    • Business Owners
    • Applications Lead
    • Any Applications Team Members

    Record the results in the APM Snapshot and Foundations Tool

    4.4 Assess redundancies (optional)

    Account Management

    Call Management

    Order/Transaction Processing

    Contract Management

    Lead/Opportunity Management

    Forecasting/Planning

    Customer Surveying

    Email Synchronization

    M M M M S S C W

    CRM 1

    CRM 2

    CRM 3

    4.5 Determine dispositions for redundant applications (optional)

    Estimated time: 1 hour per group

    1. Based on the feature-level assessment, determine if you can omit applications if they don’t truly overlap with other applications.
    2. Make a copy of the “App Comparison” worksheet and select the applications you want to compare based on your functional analysis.
    3. Determine the preferred application(s). Use the diagram to inform your decision. This may be the application closest to the top right (strong health and value). However, less expensive options or any options that provide a more complete set of features may be preferable.
    4. Open the “App Rationalization Results” worksheet. Update your disposition for each application.
    5. Use these updated dispositions to determine a call to action, new project, or initiative. Ideate and/or discuss with the team any potential initiatives. Update your roadmap with these initiatives in the next step.
    InputOutput
    • Feature-level review of application redundancy
    • Redundancy comparison
    • Assigned dispositions for redundant applications
    MaterialsParticipants
    • APM Snapshot and Foundations Tool
    • Business Owners
    • Applications Lead
    • Any Applications Team Members

    Record the results in the APM Snapshot and Foundations Tool

    Compare application groups

    Group comparison can be used for more than just redundant/overlapping applications.

    The image contains a screenshot of images that demonstrate comparing application groups.

    Roadmaps are used for different purposes

    Roadmaps are used for different communication purposes and at varying points in your application delivery practice. Some use a roadmap to showcase strategy and act as a feedback mechanism that allows stakeholders to validate any changes (process 1). Others may use it to illustrate and communicate approved and granular elements of a change to an application to inform appropriate stakeholders of what to anticipate (process 2).

    Select Dispositions & Identify New Initiatives

    Add to Roadmap

    Validate Direction

    Plan Project

    Execute Project

    Select Dispositions & Identify New Initiatives

    • Project Proposal
    • Feasibility/ Estimation
    • Impact Assessment
    • Business Case
    • Initial Design

    Approve Project

    Add to Roadmap

    Execute Project

    The steps between selecting a disposition and executing on any resulting project will vary based on the organization’s project intake standards (or lack thereof).

    This blueprint focuses on building a strategic portfolio roadmap prior to any in-depth assessments related to initiative/project intake, approval, and prioritization. For in-depth support related to intake, approval, prioritization, or planning, review the following resources.

    The image contains a screenshot of the Deliver on your Digital Product Vision blueprint. The image contains a screenshot of the Deliver Digital Products at Scale blueprint.

    Determine what makes it onto the roadmap

    A roadmap should not be limited to what is approved or committed to. A roadmap should be used to present the items that need to happen and begin the discussion of how or if this can be put into place. However, not every idea should make the cut and end up in front of key stakeholders.

    The image contains a screenshot of steps to be taken to determine what makes it onto the roadmap.

    4.6 Prioritize initiatives

    Estimated time: 1-4 hours

    1. This is a high-level assessment to provide a sense of feasibility, practicality, and priority as well as an estimated timeline of a given initiative. Do not get lost in granular estimations. Use this as an input to your demand planning process.
    2. Enter the specific name or type of initiative.
      1. Process Initiative: Any project or effort focused on process improvements without technical modification to an app (e.g. user migration, change in SLA, new training program). Write the application and initiative name on a blue sticky note.
      2. App Initiative: Any project or effort involving technical modification to an app (e.g. refactoring, platform migration, feature addition or upgrade). Write the application and initiative name on a yellow sticky note.
      3. Decommission Initiative: Any project and related efforts to remove an app (e.g. migrating data, removal from server). Write the application and initiative name on a red sticky note.
    3. Prioritize the initiative to aid in demand planning. This is prepopulated from your selected application disposition, but you can set a different priority for the initiative here.
    4. Select the Initiative Phase in the timeline to show the intended schedule and sequencing of the initiative.
    Input Output
    • Assigned dispositions
    • Rationalization results
    • Prioritized initiatives
    Materials Participants
    • Whiteboard and markers
    • APM Snapshot and Foundations Tool
    • Delivery Leads
    • Applications Lead
    • Any Applications Team Members

    Record the results in the APM Snapshot and Foundations Tool

    4.6 APM worksheet data journey map

    The image contains a screenshot of the worksheet data journey map.

    Populate roadmap example

    The image contains an example of the populate roadmap.

    Create a recurring update plan

    • Application inventories become stale before you know it. Build steps in your procurement process to capture the appropriate information on new applications. Also, build in checkpoints to revisit your inventory regularly to assess the accuracy of inventory data.
    • Rationalization is not one and done; it must occur with an appropriate cadence.
      • Business priorities change, which will impact the current and future value of your apps.
      • Now more than ever, user expectations evolve rapidly.
      • Application sprawl likely won’t stop, so neither will shadow IT and redundancies.
      • Obsolescence, growing technical debt, changing security threats, or shifting technology strategies are all inevitable, as is the gradual decline of an app’s health or technical fit.
    • An application’s disposition changes quicker than you think, and rationalization requires a structured cadence. You need to plan to minimize the need for repeated efforts. Conversely, many use preceding iterations to increase the analysis (e.g. more thorough TCO projections or more granular capability-application alignment).
    • Portfolio roadmaps require a cadence for both updates and presentations to stakeholders. Updates are often completed semiannually or quarterly to gauge the business adjustments that affect the timeline of the domain-specific applications. The presentation of a roadmap should be completed alongside meetings or gatherings of key decision makers.
    • M&A or other restructuring events will prompt the need to address all the above.

    The image contains a screenshot of chart to help determine frequency of updating your roadmap.

    Build your APM maturity by taking the right steps at the right time

    The image contains a diagram to demonstrate the steps taken to build APM maturity.

    Info-Tech’s Build an Application Rationalization Framework provides additional TCO and value tools to help build out your portfolio strategy.

    APM is an iterative and evergreen process

    APM provides oversight and awareness of your application portfolio’s performance and support for your business operations and value delivery to all users and customers.

    Determine scope and categories Build your list of applications and capabilities Score each application based on your values Determine outcomes based on app scoring and support for capabilities

    1. Lay Your Foundations

    • 1.1 Assess the state of your current application portfolio
    • 1.2 Determine narrative
    • 1.3 Define goals and metrics
    • 1.4 Define application categories
    • 1.5 Determine APM steps and roles (SIPOC)

    2. Improve Your Inventory

    • 2.1 Populate your inventory
    • 2.2 Align to business capabilities

    3. Rationalize Your Apps

    • 3.1 Assess business value
    • 3.2 Assess technical health
    • 3.3 Assess end-user perspective
    • 3.4 Assess total cost of ownership

    4. Populate Your Roadmap

    • 4.1 Review APM Snapshot results
    • 4.2 Review APM Foundations results
    • 4.3 Determine dispositions
    • 4.4 Assess redundancies (Optional)
    • 4.5 Determine dispositions for redundant applications (Optional)
    • 4.6 Prioritize initiatives
    • 4.7 Ongoing APM cadence

    Repeat according to APM cadence and application changes

    4.7 Ongoing APM cadence

    Estimated time: 1-2 hours

    1. Determine how frequently you will update or present the artifacts of your APM practice: Application Inventory, Rationalization, Disposition, and Roadmap.
    2. For each artifact, determine the:
      1. Owner: Who is accountable for the artifact and the data or information within the artifact and will be responsible for or delegate the responsibility of updating or presenting the artifact to the appropriate audience?
      2. Update Cadence: How frequently will you update the artifact? Include what regularly scheduled meetings this activity will be within.
      3. Update Scope: Describe what activities will be performed to keep the artifact up to date. The goal here is to minimize the need for a full set of activities laid out within the blueprint. Optional: How will you expand the thoroughness of your analysis?
      4. Audience: Who is the audience for the artifact or assessment results?
      5. Presentation Cadence: How frequently and when will you review the artifact with the audience?
    InputOutput
    • Initial experience with APM
    • Strategic meetings schedule
    • Ongoing cadence for APM activities
    MaterialsParticipants
    • Whiteboard and markers
    • APM Snapshot and Foundations Tool
    • Applications Lead
    • Any Applications Team Members

    Record the results in the APM Snapshot and Foundations Tool

    4.7 Ongoing APM cadence

    Artifact

    Owner

    Update Cadence

    Update Scope

    Audience

    Presentation Cadence

    Inventory

    Greg Dawson

    • As new applications are acquired
    • Annual review
    • Add new application data points (this is added to implementation standards)
    • Review inventory and perform a data health check
    • Validate with app’s SME
    • Whole organization
    • Always available on team site

    Rationalization Tool

    Judy Ng

    • Annual update
    • Revisit value driver weights
    • Survey end users
    • Interview support owners
    • Interview business owners
    • Update TCO based on change in operational costs; expand thoroughness of cost estimates
    • Rescore applications
    • Business owners of applications
    • IT leaders
    • Annually alongside yearly strategy meeting

    Portfolio Roadmap

    Judy Ng

    • Monthly update alongside project updates
    • Shift the timeline of the roadmap to current day 1
    • Carry over project updates and timeline changes
    • Validate with PMs and business owners
    • Steering Committee
    • Business owners of applications
    • IT leaders
    • Quarterly alongside Steering Committee meetings
    • Upon request

    Appendices

    • Additional support slides
    • Bibliography

    The APM tool provides a single source of truth and global data sharing

    The table shows where source data is used to support different aspects of APM discovery, rationalization, and modernization.

    Worksheet Data Mapping

    Application and Capability List

    Group Alignment Matrix (1-3)

    Rationalization Inputs

    Group 1-3 Results

    Application Inventory Details

    App Rationalization Results

    Roadmap

    App Redundancy Comparison

    Application and Capability List

    App list, Groupings

    App list

    App list, Groupings

    App list, Categories

    App list, Categories

    App list

    App list

    Groups 1-3 Alignment Matrix

    App to Group Tracing

    Application Categories

    Category
    drop-down

    Category

    Category

    Rationalization Inputs

    Lens Scores (weighted input to Group score)

    Lens Scores (weighted input)

    Disposition Options

    Disposition list, Priorities list, Recommended Disposition and Priority

    Lens Scores (weighted input)

    App Rationalization Results

    Disposition

    Common application inventory attributes

    Attribute Description Common Collection Method
    Name Organization’s terminology used for the application. Auto-discovery tools will provide names for the applications they reveal. However, this may not be the organizational nomenclature. You may adapt the names by leveraging pre-existing documentation and internal knowledge or by consulting business users.
    ID Unique identifiers assigned to the application (e.g. app number). Typically an identification system developed by the application portfolio manager.
    Description A brief description of the application, often referencing core capabilities. Typically completed by leveraging pre-existing documentation and internal knowledge or by consulting business users.
    Business Units A list of all business units, departments, or user groups. Consultation, surveys, or interviews with business unit representatives. However, this doesn’t always expose hidden applications. Application-capability mapping is the most effective way to determine all the business units/user groups of an app.
    Business Capabilities A list of business capabilities the application is intended to enable. Application capability mapping completed via interviews with business unit representatives.
    Criticality A high-level grading of the importance of the application to the business, typically used for support prioritization purposes (i.e. critical, high, medium, low). Typically the criticality rating is determined by a committee representing IT and business leaders.
    Ownership The individual accountable for various aspect of the application (e.g. product owner, product manager, application support, data owner); typically includes contact information and alternatives. If application ownership is an established accountability in your organization, typically consulting appropriate business stakeholders will reveal this information. Otherwise, application capability mapping can be an effective means of identifying who that owner should be.
    Application SMEs Any relevant subject matter experts who can speak to various aspects of the application (e.g. business process owners, development managers, data architects, data stewards, application architects, enterprise architects). Technical SMEs should be known within an IT department, but shadow IT apps may require interviews with the business unit. Application capability mapping will determine the identity of those key users/business process SMEs.
    Type An indication of whether the application was developed in-house, commercial off-the-shelf, or a hybrid option. Consultation, surveys, or interviews with product owners or development managers.
    Active Status An indication of whether the application is currently active, out of commission, in repair, etc. Consultation, surveys, or interviews with product owners or operation managers.

    Common application inventory attributes

    Attribute Description Common Collection Method
    Vendor Information Identification of the vendor from whom the software was procured. May include additional items such as the vendor’s contact information. Consultation with business SMEs, end users, or procurement teams, or review of vendor contracts or license agreements.
    Links to Other Documentation Pertinent information regarding the other relevant documentation of the application (e.g. SLA, vendor contracts, data use policies, disaster recovery plan). Typically includes links to documents. Consultation with product owners, service providers, or SMEs, or review of vendor contracts or license agreements.
    Number of Users The current number of users for the application. This can be based on license information but will often require some estimation. Can include additional items of quantities at different levels of access (e.g. admin, key users, power users). Consultation, surveys, or interviews with product owners or appropriate business SMEs or review of vendor contracts or license agreements. Auto-discovery tools can reveal this information.
    Software Dependencies List of other applications or operating components required to run the application. Consultation with application architects and any architectural tools or documentation. This information can begin to reveal itself through application capability mapping.
    Hardware Dependencies Identification of any hardware or infrastructure components required to run the application (i.e. databases, platform). Consultation with infrastructure or enterprise architects and any architectural tools or documentation. This information can begin to reveal itself through application capability mapping.
    Development Language Coding language used for the application. Consultation, surveys, or interviews with development managers or appropriate technical SMEs.
    Platform A framework of services that application programs rely on for standard operations. Consultation, surveys, or interviews with infrastructure or development managers.
    Lifecycle Stage Where an application is within the birth, growth, mature, end-of-life lifecycle. Consultation with business owners and technical SMEs.
    Scheduled Updates Any major or minor updates related to the application, including the release date. Consultation with business owners and vendor managers.
    Planned or In-Flight Projects Any projects related to the application, including estimated project timeline. Consultation with business owners and project managers.

    Bibliography

    ”2019 Technology & Small Business Survey.” National Small Business Association (NSBA), n.d. Accessed 1 April 2020.
    “Application Rationalization – Essential Part of the Process for Modernization and Operational Efficiency.” Flexera, 2015. Web.
    “Applications Rationalization during M&A: Standardize, Streamline, Simplify.” Deloitte Consulting, 2016. Web.
    Bowling, Alan. “Clearer Visibility of Product Roadmaps Improves IT Planning.” ComputerWeekly.com, 1 Nov. 2010. Web.
    Brown, Alex. “Calculating Business Value.” Agile 2014 Orlando, 13 July 2014. Scrum Inc. 2014. Web.
    Brown, Roger. “Defining Business Value.” Scrum Gathering San Diego 2017. Agile Coach Journal. Web.
    “Business Application Definition.” Microsoft Docs, 18 July 2012. Web.
    “Connecting Small Businesses in the US.” Deloitte Consulting, 2017. Accessed 1 April. 2020.
    Craveiro, João. “Marty meets Martin: connecting the two triads of Product Management.” Product Coalition, 18 Nov. 2017. Web.
    Curtis, Bill. “The Business Value of Application Internal Quality.” CAST, 6 April 2009. Web.
    Fleet, Neville, Joan Lasselle, and Paul Zimmerman. “Using a Balance Scorecard to Measure the Productivity and Value of Technical Documentation Organizations.” CIDM, April 2008. Web.
    Fowler, Martin. “Application Boundary.” MartinFowler.com, 11 Sept. 2003. Web.
    Harris, Michael. “Measuring the Business Value of IT.” David Consulting Group, 2007. Web.
    “How Application Rationalization Contributes to the Bottom Line.” LeanIX, 2017. Web.
    Jayanthi, Aruna. “Application Landscape Report 2014.” Capgemini, 4 March 2014. Web.
    Lankhorst, Marc., et al. “Architecture-Based IT Valuation.” Via Nova Architectura, 31 March 2010. Web.
    “Management of business application.” ServiceNow, Jan.2020. Accessed 1 April 2020.
    Mauboussin, Michael J. “The True Measures of Success.” HBR, Oct. 2012. Web.
    Neogi, Sombit., et al. “Next Generation Application Portfolio Rationalization.” TATA, 2011. Web.
    Riverbed. “Measuring the Business Impact of IT Through Application Performance.” CIO Summits, 2015. Web.
    Rouse, Margaret. “Application Rationalization.” TechTarget, March 2016. Web.
    Van Ramshorst, E.A. “Application Portfolio Management from an Enterprise Architecture Perspective.” Universiteit Utrecht, July 2013.
    “What is a Balanced Scorecard?” Intrafocus, n.d. Web.
    Whitney, Lance. “SMBs share their biggest constraints and great challenges.” Tech Republic, 6 May 2019. Web.

    Master the Secrets of VMware Licensing to Maximize Your Investment

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}138|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Licensing
    • Parent Category Link: /licensing
    • A lack of understanding around VMware’s licensing models, bundles, and negotiation tactics makes it difficult to negotiate from a position of strength.
    • Unfriendly commercial practices combined with hyperlink-ridden agreements have left organizations vulnerable to audits and large shortfall payments.
    • Enterprise license agreements (ELAs) come in several purchasing models and do not contain the EULA or various VMware product guide documentation that governs license usage rules and can change monthly.
    • Without a detailed understanding of VMware’s various purchasing models, shelfware often occurs.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Contracts are typically overweighted with a discount at the expense of contractual T&Cs that can restrict license usage and expose you to unpleasant financial surprises and compliance risk.
    • VMware customers almost always have incomplete price information from which to effectively negotiate a “best in class” ELA.
    • VMware has a large lead in being first to market and it realizes that running dual virtualization stacks is complex, unwieldy, and expensive. To further complicate the issues, most skill sets in the industry are skewed towards VMware.

    Impact and Result

    • Negotiate desired terms and conditions at the start of the agreement, and prioritize which use rights may be more important than an additional discount percentage.
    • Gather data points and speak with licensing partners to determine if the deal being offered is in fact as great as VMware says it is.
    • Beware of out-year pricing and ELA optimization reviews that may provide undesirable surprises and more spend than was planned.

    Master the Secrets of VMware Licensing to Maximize Your Investment Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Manage Your VMware Agreements – Use the Info-Tech tools capture your existing licenses and prepare for your renewal bids.

    Use Info-Tech’s licensing best practices to avoid shelfware with VMware licensing and remain compliant in case of an audit.

    • Master the Secrets of VMware Licensing to Maximize Your Investment Storyboard

    2. Manage your VMware agreements

    Use Info-Tech’s licensing best practices to avoid shelfware with VMware licensing and remain compliant in case of an audit.

    • VMware Business as Usual – Install Base SnS Renewal Only Tool
    • VMware ELA RFQ Template

    3. Transition to the VMWare Cloud – Use these tools to evaluate your ELA and vShpere requirements and make an informed choice.

    Manage your renewals and transition to the cloud subscription model.

    • VPP Transactional Purchase Tool
    • VMware ELA Analysis Tool
    • vSphere Edition 7 Features List

    Infographic

    Further reading

    Master the Secrets of VMware Licensing to Maximize Your Investment

    Learn the essential steps to avoid overspending and to maximize negotiation leverage with VMware.

    EXECUTIVE BRIEF

    Analyst Perspective

    Master the Secrets of VMware Licensing to Maximize Your Investment.

    The image contains a picture of Scott Bickley.

    The mechanics of negotiating a deal with VMware may seem simple at first as the vendor is willing to provide a heavy discount on an enterprise license agreement (ELA). However, come renewal time, when a reduction in spend or shelfware is needed, or to exit the ELA altogether, the process can be exceedingly frustrating as VMware holds the balance of power in the negotiation.

    Negotiating a complete agreement with VMware from the start can save you from an immense headache and unforeseen expenditures. Many VMware customers do not realize that the terms and conditions in the Volume Purchasing Program (VPP) and Enterprise Purchasing Program (EPP) agreements limit how and where they are able to use their licenses.

    Furthermore, after the renewal is complete, organizations must still worry about the management of various license types, accurate discovery of what has been deployed, visibility into license key assignments, and over and under use of licenses.

    Preventive and proactive measures enclosed within this blueprint will help VMware clients mitigate this minefield of challenges.

    Scott Bickley
    Practice Lead, Vendor Management
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    Common Obstacles

    Info-Tech’s Approach

    VMware's dominant position in the virtualization space can create uncertainty to your options in the long term as well as the need to understand:

    • The hybrid cloud model.
    • Hybrid VM security and management.
    • New subscription license model and how it affects renewals.

    Make an informed decision with your VMware investments to allow for continued ROI.

    There are several hurdles that are presented when considering a VMware ELA:

    • Evolving licensing and purchasing models
    • Understanding potential ROI in the cloud landscape
    • Evolving door of corporate ownership

    Overcoming these and other obstacles are key to long-term satisfaction with your VMware infrastructure.

    Info-Tech has a two-phase approach:

    • Manage your VMware agreements.
    • Plan a transition to the cloud.

    A tactical roadmap approach to VMware ELA and the cloud will ensure long-term success and savings.

    Info-Tech Insight

    VMware customers almost always have incomplete price information from which to effectively negotiate a “best in class” ELA.

    Your challenge

    VMware's dominant position in the virtualization space can create uncertainty to your options in the long term driven by:

    • VMware’s dominant market position and ownership of the virtualization market, which is forcing customers to focus on managing capacity demand to ensure a positive ROI on every license.
    • The trend toward a hybrid cloud for many organizations, especially those considering using VMware in public clouds, resulting in confusion regarding licensing and compliance scenarios.

    ELAs and EPPs are generally the only way to get a deep discount from VMware.

    The image contains a pie chart to demonstrate that 85% have answered yes to being audited by VMware for software license compliance.

    Common obstacles

    There are several hurdles that are presented when considering a VMware ELA.

    • A lack of understanding around VMware’s licensing models, bundles, and negotiation tactics makes it difficult to negotiate from a position of strength.
    • Unfriendly commercial practices combined with hyperlink-ridden agreements have left organizations vulnerable to audits and large shortfall payments.
    • ELAs come in several purchasing models and do not contain the EULA or various VMware product guide documentation that govern license usage rules and can change monthly.

    Competition is a key driver of price

    The image contains a screenshot of a bar graph to demonstrate virtualization market share % 2022.

    Source: Datanyze

    Master the Secrets of VMware Licensing to Maximize your Investment

    The image contains a screenshot of the Thought model on Master the secrets of VMware Licensing to Maximize your Investment.

    Info-Tech’s methodology for Master the Secrets of VMware Licensing to Maximize Your Investment

    1. Manage Your VMware Agreements

    2. Transition to the VMware Cloud

    Phase Steps

    1.1 Establish licensing requirements

    1.2 Evaluate licensing options

    1.3 Evaluate agreement options

    1.4 Purchase and manage licenses

    1.5 Understand SnS renewal management

    2.1 Understand the VMware subscription model

    2.2 Migrate workloads and licenses

    2.3 Manage SnS and cloud subscriptions

    Phase Outcomes

    Understanding of your licensing requirements and what agreement option best fits your needs for now and the future.

    Knowledge of VMware’s sales model and how to negotiate the best deal.

    Knowledge of the evolving cloud subscription model and how to plan your cloud migration and transition to the new licensing.

    Insight summary

    Overarching insight

    With the introduction of the subscription licensing model, VMware licensing and renewals are becoming more complex and require a deeper understanding of the license program options to best manage renewals and cloud deployments as well as to maximize legacy ROI.

    Phase 1 insight

    Contracts are typically overweighted with a discount at the expense of contractual T&Cs that can restrict license usage and expose you to unpleasant financial surprises and compliance risk.

    Phase 1 insight

    VMware has a large lead in being first to market and it realizes running dual virtualization stacks is complex, unwieldy, and expensive. To further complicate the issues, most skill sets in the industry are skewed toward VMware.

    Phase 2 insight

    VMware has purposefully reduced a focus on the actual license terms and conditions; most customers focus on the transactional purchase or the ELA document, but the rules governing usage are on a website and can be changed by VMware regularly.

    Tactical insight

    Beware of out-year pricing and ELA optimization reviews that may provide undesirable surprises and more spend than was planned.

    Tactical insight

    Negotiate desired terms and conditions at the start of the agreement, and prioritize which use rights may be more important than an additional discount percentage.

    Blueprint deliverables

    Each step of this blueprint is accompanied by supporting deliverables to help you accomplish your goals:

    VMware ELA Analysis Tool

    VMware ELA RFQ Template Tool

    VPP Transaction Purchase Tool

    VMware ELA Analysis Tool

    Use this tool as a template for an RFQ with VMware ELA contracts.

    Use this tool to analyze cost breakdown and discount based on your volume purchasing program (VPP) level.

    The image contains screenshots of the VMware ELA Analysis Tool. The image contains a screenshot of the VMware ELA RFQ template tool. The image contains a screenshot of the VPP Transaction Purchase Tool.

    Key deliverable:

    VMware Business as Usual SnS Renewal Only Tool

    Use this tool to analyze discounts from a multi-year agreement vs. prepay. See how you can get the best discount.

    The image contains screenshots of the VMware Business as Usual SnS Renewal Only Tool.

    Blueprint Objectives

    The aim of this blueprint is to provide a foundational understanding of VMware’s licensing agreement and best practices to manage them.

    Why VMware

    What to Know

    The Future

    VMware is the leader in OS virtualization, however, this is a saturated market, which is being pressured by public and hybrid cloud as a competitive force taking market share.

    There are few viable alternatives to VMware for virtualization due to vendor lock-in of existing IT infrastructure footprint. It is too difficult and cost prohibitive to make a shift away from VMware even when alternative solutions are available.

    ELAs are the preferred method of contracting as it sets the stage for a land-and-expand product strategy; once locked into the ELA model, customers must examine VMware alternatives with preference or risk having Support and Subscription Services (SnS) re-priced at retail.

    VMware does not provide a great deal of publicly available information regarding its enterprise license agreement (ELA) options, leaving a knowledge gap that allows the sales team to steer the customer.

    VMware is taking countermeasures against increasing competition.

    Recent contract terms changed to eliminate perpetual caps on SnS renewals; they are now tied to a single year of discounted SnS, then they go to list price.

    Migration of list pricing to a website versus contract, where pricing can now be changed, reducing discount percentage effectiveness.

    Increased audits of customers, especially those electing to not renew an ELA.


    Examining VMware’s vendor profile

    Turbonomics conducted a vendor profile on major vendors, focusing on licensing and compliance. It illustrated the following results:

    The image contains a pie graph to demonstrate that the majority of companies say yes to using license enterprise software from VMware.

    The image contains a bar graph to demonstrate what license products organizations use of VMware products.

    Source: Turbonomics
    N-sample size

    Case Study

    The image contains a logo for ADP.

    INDUSTRY: Finance

    SOURCE: VMware.com

    “We’ll have network engineers, storage engineers, computer engineers, database engineers, and systems engineers all working together as one intact team developing and delivering goals on specific outcomes.” – Vipul Nagrath, CIO, ADP

    Improving developer capital management

    Constant innovation helped ADP keep ahead of customer needs in the human resources space, but it also brought constant changes to the IT environment. Internally, the company found it was spending too long working on delivering the required infrastructure and system updates. IT staff wanted to improve velocity for refreshes to better match the needs of ADP developers and encourage continued development innovation.

    Business needs

    • Improve turnaround time on infrastructure refreshes to better meet developer roadmaps.
    • Establish an IT culture that works at the global scale of ADP and empowers individual team members.
    • Streamline approach toward infrastructure resource delivery to reduce need for manual management.

    Impact

    • Infrastructure resource delivery reduced from 100+ days to minutes, improving ADP developer efficiency.
    • VMware Cloud™ on AWS establishes seamless private and public cloud workflows, fostering agility and innovation.
    • Automating IT management redirects resources to R&D, boosting time to market for new services.

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    Guided Implementation

    Workshop

    Consulting

    “Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful.” “Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track.” “We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place.” “Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project.”

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

    Guided Implementation

    What does a typical GI on this topic look like?

    Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3

    Call #1: Discuss scope requirements, objectives, and your specific challenges.

    Call #2: Assess the current state.

    Determine licensing position.

    Call #3: Complete a deployment count, needs analysis, and internal audit.

    Call #4: Review findings with analyst:

    • Review licensing options.
    • Review licensing rules.
    • Review contract option types.

    Call #5: Select licensing option. Document forecasted costs and benefits.

    Call #6: Review final contract:

    • Discuss negotiation points.
    • Plan a roadmap for SAM.

    Call #7: Negotiate final contract. Evaluate and develop a roadmap for SAM.

    A Guided Implementation (GI) is a series of calls with an Info-Tech analyst to help implement our best practices in your organization.

    A typical GI is between 2 to 6 calls over the course of 1 to 2 months.

    Phase # 1

    Manage Your VMware Agreements

    Phase 1

    Phase 2

    1.1 Establish licensing requirements

    1.2 Evaluate licensing options

    1.3 Evaluate agreement options

    1.4 Purchase and manage licenses

    2.1 Understand the VMware subscription model

    2.2 Migrate workloads and licenses

    2.3 Discuss the VMware sales approach

    2.4 Manage SnS and cloud subscriptions

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Understanding the VMware licensing model
    • Understanding the license agreement options
    • Understanding the VMware sales approach

    This phase will take you thorough:

    • The new VMware subscription movement to the cloud
    • How to prepare and migrate
    • Manage your subscriptions efficiently

    1.1 Establish licensing requirements

    VMware has greatly improved the features of vSphere over time.

    vSphere Main Editions Overview

    • vSphere Standard – Provides the basic features for server consolidation. A support and subscription contract (SnS) is mandatory when purchasing the vSphere Standard.
    • vSphere Enterprise Plus – Provides the full range of vSphere features. A support and subscription contract (SnS) is mandatory when purchasing the Enterprise Plus editions.
    • vSphere Essentials kit – The Essentials kit is an all-in-one solution for small environments with up to three hosts (2 CPUs on each host). Support is optional when purchasing the Essentials kit and is available on a per-incident basis.
    • vSphere Essentials Plus kit – This is similar to the Essentials kit and provides additional features such as vSphere vMotion, vSphere HA, and vSphere replication. A support and subscription contract (SnS) is sold separately, and a minimum of one year of SnS is required.

    Review vSphere Edition Features

    The image contains a screenshot to review the vSphere Edition Features.

    Download the vSphere Edition 7 Features List

    1.2 Evaluate licensing options

    VMware agreement types

    Review purchase options to align with your requirements.

    Transactional VPP EPP ELA

    Transactional

    Entry-level volume license purchasing program

    Mid-level purchasing program

    Highest-level purchasing program

    • Purchasing in this model is not recommended for business purposes unless very infrequent and low quantities.
    • 250 points minimum
    • Four tiers of discounts
    • Rolling eight-quarter points accumulation period
    • Discounts on license only

    Deal size of initial purchase typically is:

    • US$250K MSRP License + SnS (2,500 tokens)
    • Exceptions do exist with purchase volume

    Minimum deal size of top-up purchase:

    • US$50K MSRP License + SnS (500 tokens)
    • Initial purchase determines token level
    • Three-year term

    Minimum deal size of initial purchase:

    • US$150K-$250K
    • Discounted licenses and SnS through term of contract
    • Single volume license key
    • No final true-up
    • Global deployment rights and consolidation of multiple agreements

    1.2.1 The Volume Purchasing Program (VPP)

    This is the entry-level purchasing program aimed at small/mid-sized organizations.

    How the program works

    • The threshold to be able to purchase from the VPP program is 250 points minimum, equivalent to $25,000.
    • Discounts attained can only be applied to license purchases. They do not apply to service and support/renewals. Discounts range from 4% to 12%.
    • For the large majority of products 1 VPP point = ~$100.
      • Point values will be the same globally.
      • Point ratios may vary over time as SKUs are changed.
      • Points are valid for two years.

    Benefits

    • Budget predictability for two years.
    • Simple license purchase process.
    • Receive points on qualifying purchases that accumulate over a rolling eight-quarter period.
    • Online portal for tracking purchases and eligible discounts.
    • Global program where affiliates can purchase from existing contract.

    VPP Point & Discount Table

    Level

    Point Range

    Discount

    1

    250-599

    4%

    2

    600-999

    6%

    3

    1,000-1,749

    9%

    4

    1,750+

    12%

    Source: VMware Volume Purchasing Program

    1.2.2 Activity VPP Transactional Purchase Tool

    1-3 hours

    Instructions:

    1. Use the tool to analyze the cost breakdown and discount based on your Volume Purchasing Program level.
    2. On tab 1, Enter SnS install base renewal units and or new license details.
    3. Review tab 2 for Purchase summary.

    The image contains a screenshot of the VPP Transactional Purchase Tool.

    Input Output
    • SnS renewal details
    • New license requirements and pricing
    • Transaction purchase summary
    • Estimated VPP purchase level
    Materials Participants
    • Current VMware purchase orders
    • Any SnS renewal requirements
    • Transaction Purchase Tool
    • Procurement
    • Vendor Management
    • Licensing Admin

    Download the VPP Transactional Purchase Tool

    1.3 Evaluate agreement options

    Introduction to EPP and ELA

    What to know when using a token/credit-based agreement.

    Token/credit-based agreements carry high risk as customers are purchasing a set number of tokens/credits to be redeemed during the ELA term for licenses.

    • Tokens/credits that are not used during the ELA term expire and become worthless.
    • By default in most agreements (negotiation dependent), tokens/credits are tied to pricing maintained by VMware on its website that is subject to change (increase usually), resulting in a reduced value for the tokens/credits.
      • Therefore, it is necessary to negotiate to have current list prices for all products/versions included in the ELA to prevent price increases while in the current ELA term.
    • Token-based agreements may come with a lower overall discount level as VMware is granting more flexibility in terms of the wider product selection offered, vendor cost of overhead to manage the redemption program, currency exchange risks, and more complex revenue recognition headaches.

    1.3.1 The Enterprise Purchasing Program (EPP)

    This is aimed at mid-tier customers looking for flexibility with deeper discounting.

    How the program works

    • Token-based program in which tokens are redeemed for licenses and/or SnS.
      • Tokens can be added at any time to active fund.
      • Token usage is automatically tracked and reported.
    • Minimum order of 2,500 tokens, equivalent to $250,000 (1 token=$100).
      • Exceptions have been made, allowing for lower minimum spends.
    • Restricted to specific regions, not a global agreement.
    • Self-service portal for access to license keys and support entitlements.
    • Deeper discounting than the VMware Volume Purchase Program.
    • EPP initial purchase gets VPP L4 for four years.

    Benefits

    • Able to mix and match VMware products, manage licenses, and adjust deployment strategy.
    • Prices are protected for term of the EPP agreement.
    • Number of tokens needed to obtain a product or SnS are negotiated at the start of the contract and fixed for the term.
    • SnS is co-termed to the EPP term.
    • Ability to purchase new products that become available at a future date and are listed on the EPP Eligibility Matrix.

    EPP Level & Point Table

    Level

    Point Range

    7

    2,500-3,499

    8

    3,500-4,499

    9

    4,500-5,999

    10

    6,000+

    Source: VMware Volume Purchasing Program

    1.3.2 The ELA is aimed at large global organizations, offering the deepest discounts with operational benefits and flexibility

    What is an ELA?

    • The ELA agreement provides the best vehicle for global enterprises to obtain maximum discounts and price-hold protection for a set period of time. Discounts and price holds are removed once an ELA has expired.
    • The ELA minimum spend previously was $500,000. Purchase volume now generally starts at $250K total spend with exceptions and, depending on VMware, it may be possible to attain for $150K in net-new license spend.

    Key things to know

    • Customers pay up front for license and SnS rights, but depending on the deployment plans, the value of the licenses is not realized and/or recognized for up to two years after point of purchase.
    • License and SnS is paid up front for a three-year period in most ELAs, although a one- or two-year term can be negotiated.
    • Licenses not deployed in year one should be discounted in value and drive a re-evaluation of the ELA ROI, as even heavily discounted licenses that are not used until year three may not be such a great deal in retrospect.
      • Use a time value of money calculation to arrive at a realistic ROI.
      • Partner with Finance and Accounting to ensure the ROI also clears any Internal Hurdle Rate (IHR).
      • Share and strategically position your IHR with VMware and resellers to ensure they understand the minimum value an ELA deal must bring to the table.
    • Organizational changes, such as merger, acquisition, and divestiture (MAD) activities, may result in the customer paying for license rights that can no longer be used and/or require a renegotiated ELA.

    Info-Tech Insight

    If a legacy ELA exists that has “deploy or lose” language, engage VMware to recapture any lost license rights as VMware has changed this language effective with 2016 agreements and there is an “appeals” process for affected customers.

    1.3.3 Select the best ELA variant to match your specific demand profile and financial needs

    The advantages of an ELA are:

    • Maximum discount level + price protection
    • SnS discounted at % of net license fee
    • Sole option for global use territory rights

    General disadvantages are:

    • Term lock-in with SnS for three years
    • Pay up front and if defer usage, ROI drops
    • Territory rights priced at a premium versus domestic use rights

    Type of ELAs

    ELA Type

    Description

    Pros and Cons

    Capped (max quantities)

    Used to purchase a specific quantity and type of license.

    Pro – Clarity on what will be purchased

    Pro – Lower risk of over licensing

    Con – Requires accurate forecasting

    All you can eat or unlimited

    Used to purchase access to specified products that can be deployed in unlimited quantities during the ELA term.

    Pro – Acquire large quantity of licenses

    Pro – Accurate forecasting not critical

    Con – Deployment can easily exceed forecast, leading to high renewal costs

    Burn-down

    A form of capped ELA purchase that uses prepaid tokens that can be used more flexibly to acquire a variety of licenses or services. This can include the hybrid purchasing program (HPP) credits. However, the percentage redeemable for VMware subscription services may be limited to 10% of the MSRP value of the HPP credit.

    Pro – Accurate demand forecast not critical

    Pro – Can be used for products and services

    Con – Unused tokens or credits are forfeited

    True-up

    Allows for additional purchases during the ELA term on a determined schedule based on the established ELA pricing.

    Pro – Consumption payments matched after initial purchase

    Pro – Accurate demand forecast not critical

    Con – Potentially requires transaction throughout term

    1.4 Purchase and manage licenses

    Negotiating ELA terms and conditions

    Editable copies of VMware’s license and governance documentation are a requirement to initiate the dialogue and negotiation process over T&Cs.

    VMware’s licensing is complex and although documentation is publicly available, it is often hidden on VMware’s website.

    Many VMware customers often overlook reviewing the license T&Cs, leaving them open to compliance risks.

    It is imperative for customers to understand:

    • Product definition for licensing of each acquired product
    • Products included by bundle
    • Use restrictions:
      • The VMware Product Guide, which includes information about:
        • ELA Order Forms, Amendments, Exhibits, EULA, Support T&Cs, and other policies that add dozens of pages to a contractual agreement.
        • All of these documents are web based and can change monthly; URL links in the contract do not take the user to the actual document but a landing page from which customers must find the applicable documents.
      • Obtain copies of ALL current documents at the time of your order and keep as a reference in the CLM and SAM systems.

    Build in time to obtain, review, and negotiate these documents (easily weeks to months).

    1.4.1 Negotiating ELA terms and conditions specifics

    License and Deployment

    • Review perpetual use rights for all licenses purchased under the ELA (exception being subscription services).
    • Carefully scrutinize contract language for clearly defined deployment rights.
      • Some agreements contain language that terminates the use rights for licenses not deployed by the end of the ELA term.
    • While older contracts would frequently contain clearly defined token values and product prices for the ELA term, VMware has moved away from this process and now refers to URL links for current MSRP pricing.

    Use Rights

    • The customer’s legal entities and territories listed in the contract are hard limits on the license usage via the VMware Product Guide definitions. Global use rights are not a standard license grant with VMware license agreement by default. Global rights are usually tied to an ELA.
    • VMware audits most aggressively against violations of territory use rights and will use the non-compliance events to resolve the issue via a commercial transaction.
      • Negotiate for assignment rights with no strings attached in terms of fees or multi-party consent by future affiliates or successors to a surviving entity.
    • Extraordinary Corporate Transaction clause: VMware’s standard language prevents customers from using licenses within the ELA for any third party that becomes part of customer’s business by way of acquisition, merger, consolidation, change of control, reorganization, or other similar transaction.
      • Request VMware to drop this language.
    • Include any required language pertaining to MAD events as default language will not allow for transfer or assignment of license rights.

    Checklist of necessary information to negotiate the best deal

    Product details that go beyond the sales pitch

    • Product family
    • Unique product SKU for license renewal
    • Part description
    • Current regional or global price list
    • One and three-year proposal for SnS renewals including new license and SnS detail
    • SnS term dates
    • Discount or offered prices for all line items (global pricing is generally ~20% higher than US pricing)

    Different support levels (e.g. basic, enterprise, per incident)

    • Standard pricing:
      • Basic Support = 21% of current list price (12x5)
      • Production Support = 25% of current list price (24x7 for severity 1 issues) – defined in VMware Support and Subscription Services T&Cs; non-severity 1 issues are 12x5

    Details to ensure the product being purchased matches the business needs

    • Realizing after the fact the product is insufficient with respect to functional requirements or that extra spend is required can be frustrating and extend expected timelines

    SnS renewals pricing is based on the (1) year SnS list price

    • This can be bundled for a multi-year discounted SnS rate (can result in 12%+ under VPP)

    Governing agreements, VPP program details

    • Have a printed copy of documents that are URL links, which VMware can change, allowing for surprises or unexpected changes in rules

    1.4.2 Activity VMware ELA Analysis Tool

    2-4 hours

    Instructions:

    1. As a group, review the various RFQ responses. Identify top three proposals and start to enter proposal details into the VPP Prepay or ELA tabs of the analysis tool.
    2. Review savings in the ELA Offer Analysis tab.

    The image contains screenshots of the VMware ELA Analysis Tool.

    Input Output
    • RFQ requirements data
    • RFQ response data
    • Analysis of ELA proposals
    • ELA savings analysis
    Materials Participants
    • RFQ response documents
    • ELA Analysis Tool
    • IT Leadership
    • Procurement
    • Vendor Management

    Download the VMware ELA Analysis Tool

    1.4.3 Negotiating ELA terms and conditions specifics: pricing, renewal, and exit

    VMware does not offer price protection on future license consumption by default.

    Securing “out years” pricing for SnS or the cost of SnS is critical or it will default to a set percentage (25%) of MSRP, removing the ELA discount.

    Typically, the out year is one year; maximum is two years.

    Negotiate the “go forward” SnS pricing post-ELA term as part of the ELA negotiations when you have some leverage.

    Default after (1) out year is to rise to 25% of current MSRP versus as low as 20% of net license price within the ELA.

    Carefully incorporate the desired installed-base licenses that were acquired pre-ELA into the agreement, but ensure unwanted licenses are removed.

    Ancillary but binding support policies, online terms and conditions, and other hyperlinked documentation should be negotiated and incorporated as part of the agreement whenever possible.

    1.4.4 Find the best reseller partner

    Seek out a qualified VMware partner that will work with you and with your interest as a priority:

    1. Resellers, at minimum, should have achieved an enterprise-level rating, as these partners can offer the deepest discounts and have more clout with VMware.
    2. Select your reseller prior to engaging in any RFX acquisition steps. Verify they are enterprise level or higher AND secure their written commitment to maximum pass-through of the discounting provided to them by VMware.
    3. Document and prioritize key T&Cs for your ELA and submit to your sales team along with a requirement and timeline for their formal response. Essentially, this escalates outside of the VMware process and disrupts the status quo. Ideally this will occur in advance of being presented a contract by VMware and be pre-emptive in nature.
    4. If applicable and of benefit or a high priority, seek out a reseller that is willing to finance the VMware upfront payment cost at a low or no interest rate.
    5. It will be important to have ELA-level deals escalated to higher levels of authority to obtain “best in class” discount levels, above and beyond those prescribed in the VMware sales playbook.
    6. VMware’s standard process is to “route” customers through a pre-defined channel and “deal desk” process. Preferred pricing of up to an additional 10% discount is reserved for the first reseller that registers the deal with VMware, with larger discounts reserved for the Enterprise and Premium partners. Additional discounts can be earned if the deal closes within specified time periods (First Deal Registration).

    1.4.5 Activity VMware ELA RFQ Template

    1-3 hours

    Use this tool for as a template for an RFQ with VMware ELA contracts.

    1. For SnS renewals that contain no new licenses, state that the requirement for award consideration is the provisioning of all details for each itemized SnS renewal product code corresponding to all the licenses of your installed base. The details for the renewals are to be placed in Section 1 of the template.
    2. SnS Renewal Options: Info-Tech recommends that you ask for one- and three-year SnS renewal proposals, assuming these terms are realistic for your business requirements. Then compare your SnS BAU costs for these two options against ELA offers to determine the best choice for your renewal.

    The image contains a screenshot of the VMware ELA RFQ Template.

    Input Output
    • Renewing SnS data
    • Agreement type options
    • Detailed list of required licenses
    • Summary list of SnS requirements
    Materials Participants
    • RFQ Template
    • SnS renewal summary
    • New license/subscription details
    • IT Leadership
    • Vendor Management
    • Procurement

    Download the VMware ELA RFQ Template

    1.4.6 Consider your path forward

    Consider your route forward as contract commitments, license compliance, and terms and conditions differ in structure to perpetual models previously used.

    • Are you able to accurately discover VMware licensing within your environment?
    • Is licensing managed for compliance? Are internal audits conducted so you have accurate results?
    • Have the product use rights been examined for terms and conditions such as geographic rights? Some T&Cs may change over time due to hyperlinked references within commercial documents.
    • How are Oracle and SQL being used within your VMware environment? This may affect license compliance with Oracle and Microsoft in virtualized environments.
    • Prepare for the Subscription model; it’s here now and will be the lead discussion with all VMware reps going forward.

    Shift to Subscription

    1. With the $64bn takeover by Broadcom, there will be a significant shift and pressure to the subscription model.
    2. Broadcom has significant growth targets for its VMware acquisition that can only be achieved through a strong press to a SaaS model.

    Info-Tech Insight

    VMware has a license cost calculator and additional licensing documents that can be used to help determine what spend should be.

    Phase # 2

    Transition to the VMware Cloud

    Phase 1

    Phase 2

    1.1 Establish licensing requirements

    1.2 Evaluate licensing options

    1.3 Evaluate agreement options

    1.4 Purchase and manage licenses

    2.1 Understand the VMware subscription model

    2.2 Migrate workloads and licenses

    2.3 Discuss the VMware sales approach

    2.4 Manage SnS and cloud subscriptions

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Understand the VMware licensing model
    • Understand the license agreement options
    • Understand the VMware sales approach

    This phase will take you thorough:

    • The new VMware subscription movement to the cloud
    • How to prepare and migrate
    • Manage your subscriptions efficiently

    2.1 Understand the VMware subscription model

    VMware Cloud Universal

    • VMware Cloud Universal unifies compute, network, and storage capabilities across infrastructures, management, and applications.
    • Take advantage of financial and cloud management flexibility by combining on-premises and SaaS capabilities for automation, operations, log analytics, and network visibility across your infrastructure.
    • Capitalize on VMware knowledge by integrating proven migration methods and plans across your transformation journey such as consumption strategies, business outcome workshops, and more.
    • Determine your eligibility to earn a one-time discount with this exclusive benefit designed to offset the value of your current unamortized VMware on-premises license investments and then reallocate toward your multi-cloud initiatives.

    2.2 Migrate workloads and licenses to the cloud

    There are several cloud migration options and solutions to consider.

    • VMware Cloud offers solutions that can provide a low-cost path to the cloud that will help accelerate modernization.
    • There are also many third-party solution providers who can be engaged to migrate workloads and other infrastructure to VMware Cloud and into other public cloud providers.
    • VMware Cloud can be deployed on many IaaS providers such as AWS, Azure, Google, Dell, and IBM.

    VMware Cloud Assist

    1. Leverage all available transition funding opportunities and any IaaS migration incentives from VMware.
    2. Learn and understand the value and capabilities of VMware vRealize Cloud Universal to help you transition and manage hybrid infrastructure.

    2.2.1 Manage your VMware cloud subscriptions

    Use VMware vRealize to manage private, public, and local environments.

    Combine SaaS and on-premises capabilities for automation, operations, log analytics, network visibility, security, and compliance into one license.

    The image contains a screenshot of a diagram to demonstrate VMware cloud subscriptions.

    2.3 The VMware sales approach

    Understand the pitch before entering the discussion

    1. VMware will present a PowerPoint presentation proposal comparing a Business-as-Usual (BAU) scenario versus the ELA model.
    2. Critical factors to consider if considering the proposed ELA are growth rate projections, deployment schedule, cost of non-ELA products/options, shelf-ware, and non-ELA discounts (e.g. VPP, multi-year, or pre-paid).
    3. Involving VMware’s direct account team along with your reseller in the negotiations can be beneficial. Keep in mind that VMware ultimately decides on the final price in terms of the discount that is passed through. Ensure you have a clear line of sight into how pricing is determined.
    4. Explore reseller incentives and promotional programs that may provide for deeper than normal discount opportunities.

    INFO-TECH TIP: Create your own assumptions as inputs into the BAU model and then evaluate the ELA value proposition instead of depending on VMware’s model.

    2.4 Manage SnS and cloud subscriptions

    The new subscription model is making SnS renewal more complex.

    • Start renewal planning four to six months prior to anniversary.
    • Work closely with your reseller on your SnS renewal options.
    • Request “as is” versus subscription renewal proposal from reseller or VMware with a “savings” component.
    • Consider and review multi-year versus annual renewal; savings will differ.
    • For the Subscription transition renewal model, ensure that credits for legacy licensing is provided.
    • Negotiate cloud transition investments and incentives from VMware.

    What information to collect and how to analyze it

    • Negotiating toward preferred terms on SnS is critical, more so than when new license purchases are made, as approximately 75-80% of server virtualization are at x86 workloads, where maintenance revenue is a larger source of revenue for VMware than new license sales.
    • All relevant license and SnS details must be obtained from VMware to include Product Family, Part Description, Product Code (SKU), Regional/Global List Price, SnS Term Dates, and Discount Price for all new licenses.
    • VMware has all costs tied to the US dollar; you must calculate currency conversion into ROI models as VMware does not adjust token values of products across geographies or currency of purchase. The token to dollar value by product SKU is locked for the three-year term. This translates into a variable cost model depending on how local currency fluctuates against the US dollar; time the initial purchase to take this into consideration, if applicable.
    • Products purchased based on MSRP price with each token contains a value of US$100. Under the Hybrid Purchasing Program (HPP) credit values and associated buying power will fluctuate over the term as VMware reserves the right to adjust current list prices. Consider locking in a set product list and pricing versus HPP.
    • Take a structured approach to discover true discounts via the use of a tailored RFQ template and options model to compare and contrast VMware ELA proposals.

    Use Info-Tech Research Group’s customized RFQ template to discover true discount levels and model various purchase options for VMware ELA proposals.

    The image contains a screenshot of the VMware RFQ Template Tool.

    Summary of accomplishment

    Knowledge Gained

    • The key pieces of licensing information that should be gathered about the current state of your own organization.
    • An in-depth understanding of the required licenses across all of your products.
    • Clear methodology for selecting the most effective contract type.
    • Development of measurable, relevant metrics to help track future project success and identify areas of strength and weakness within your licensing program.

    Processes Optimized

    • Senior leaders in IT now have a clear understanding of the importance of licensing in relation to business objectives.
    • Understanding of the various licensing considerations that need to be made.
    • Contract negotiation.

    Related Info-Tech Research

    Prepare for Negotiations More Effectively

    • IT budgets are increasing, but many CIOs feel their budgets are inadequate to accomplish what is being asked of them.
    • Eighty percent of organizations don’t have a mature, repeatable, scalable negotiation process.
    • Training dollars on negotiations are often wasted or ineffective.

    Price Benchmarking & Negotiation

    You need to achieve an objective assessment of vendor pricing in your IT contracts, but you have limited knowledge about:

    • Current price benchmarking on the vendor.
    • Pricing and negotiation intelligence.
    • How to secure a market-competitive price.
    • Vendor pricing tiers, models, and negotiation tactics.

    VMware vRealize Cloud Management

    VMware vCloud Suite is an integrated offering that brings together VMware’s industry-leading vSphere hypervisor and VMware vRealize Suite multi-vendor hybrid cloud management platform. VMware’s new portable licensing units allow vCloud Suite to build and manage both vSphere-based private clouds and multi-vendor hybrid clouds.

    Bibliography

    Barrett, Alex. “vSphere and vCenter licensing and pricing explained -- a VMware license guide.” TechTarget, July 2010. Accessed 7 May 2018.
    Bateman, Kayleigh. “VMware licensing, pricing and features mini guide.” Computer Weekly, May 2011. Accessed 7 May 2018.
    Blaisdell, Rick. “What Are The Common Business Challenges The VMware Sector Faces At This Point In Time?” CIO Review, n.d. Accessed 7 May 2018.
    COMPAREX. “VMware Licensing Program.” COMPAREX, n.d. Accessed 7 May 2018.
    Couesbot, Erwann. “Using VMware? Oracle customers hate this licensing pitfall.” UpperEdge, 17 October 2016. Accessed 7 May 2018.
    Crayon. “VMware Licensing Programs.” Crayon, n.d. Accessed 7 May 2018.
    Datanyze." Virtualization Software Market Share.” Datanyze, n.d. Web.
    Demers, Tom. “Top 18 Tips & Quotes on the Challenges & Future of VMware Licensing.” ProfitBricks, 1 September 2015. Accessed 7 May 2018.
    Fenech, J. “A quick look at VMware vSphere Editions and Licensing.” VMware Hub by Altaro, 17 May 2017. Accessed 7 May 2018.
    Flexera. “Challenges of VMware Licensing.” Flexera, n.d. Accessed 5 February 2018.
    Fraser, Paris. “A Guide for VMware Licensing.” Sovereign, 11 October 2016. Accessed 7 May 2018.
    Haag, Michael. “IDC Data Shows vSAN is the Largest Share of Total HCI Spending.” VMware Blogs, 1 December 2017. Accessed 7 May 2018.
    Kealy, Victoria. “VMware Licensing Quick Guide 2015.” The ITAM Review, 17 December 2015. Accessed 7 May 2018.
    Kirsch, Brian. “A VMware licensing guide to expanding your environment.” TechTarget, August 2017. Accessed 7 May 2018.
    Kirupananthan, Arun. “5 reasons to get VMware licensing right.” Softchoice, 16 April 2018. Accessed 7 May 2018.
    Knorr, Eric. “VMware on AWS: A one-way ticket to the cloud.” InfoWorld, 17 October 2016. Accessed 7 May 2018
    Leipzig. “Help, an audit! License audits by VMware. Are you ready?” COMPAREX Group, 2 May 2016. Accessed 7 May 2018.
    Mackie, Kurt. “VMware Rips Microsoft for Azure “Bare Metal” Migration Solution.” Redmond Magazine, 27 November 2017. Accessed 7 May 2018.
    Micromail. “VMware vSphere Software Licensing.” Micromail, n.d. Accessed 7 May 2018.
    Microsoft Corportation. “Migrating VMware to Microsoft Azure” Microsoft Azure, November 2017. Accessed 7 May 2018.
    Peter. “Server Virtualization and OS Trends.” Spiceworks, 30 August 2016. Accessed 7 May 2018.
    Rich. “VMware running on Azure.” The ITAM Review, 28 November 2017. Accessed 7 May 2018.
    Robb, Drew. “Everything you need to know about VMware’s licensing shake up.” Softchoice, 4 March 2016. Accessed 7 May 2018.
    Rose, Brendan. “How to determine which VMware licensing option is best.” Softchoice, 28 July 2015. Accessed 7 May 2018.
    Scholten, Eric. “New VMware licensing explained.” VMGuru, 12 July 2011. Accessed 7 May 2018.
    Sharwood, Simon. “Microsoft to run VMware on Azure, on bare metal. Repeat. Microsoft to run VMware on Azure.” The Register, 22 November 2017. Accessed 7 May 2018.
    Siebert, Eric. “Top 7 VMware Management Challenges.” Veeam, n.d. Web.
    Smith, Greg. “Will The Real HCI Market Leader Please Stand Up?” Nutanix, 29 September 2017. Accessed 7 May 2018.
    Spithoven, Richard. “Licensing Oracle software in VMware vCenter 6.0.” LinkedIn, 2 May 2016. Accessed 7 May 2018.
    VMTurbo, Inc. “Licensing, Compliance & Audits in the Cloud Era.” Turbonomics, November 2015. Web.
    VMware. “Aug 1st – Dec 31st 2016 Solution Provider Program Requirements & Incentives & Rewards.” VMware, n.d. Web.
    VMware. “Global Support and Subscription Services “SnS” Renewals Policy.” VMware, n.d. Web.
    VMware. “Support Policies.” VMware, n.d. Accessed 7 May 2018.
    VMware. “VMware Cloud Community.” VMware Cloud, n.d. Accessed 7 May 2018.
    VMware. “VMware Cloud on AWS” VMware Cloud, n.d. Accessed 7 May 2018.
    VMware. “VMware Enterprise Purchasing Program.” VMware, 2013. Web.
    VMware. “VMware Product Guide.” VMware, May 2018. Web.
    VMware. “VMware Volume Purchasing Program.” VMware, April 2019. Web.
    VMware. "VMware Case Studies." VMware, n.d. Web.
    Wiens, Rob. “VMware Enterprise Licensing – What You Need To Know. House of Brick, 14 April 2017. Accessed 7 May 2018

    CIO Priorities 2022

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}328|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 10.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $31,499 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 9 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Innovation
    • Parent Category Link: /innovation
    • Understand how to respond to trends affecting your organization.
    • Determine your priorities based on current state and relevant internal factors.
    • Assign the right amount of resources to accomplish your vision.
    • Consider what new challenges outside of your control will demand a response.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    A priority is created when external factors hold strong synergy with internal goals and an organization responds by committing resources to either avert risk or seize opportunity. These are the priorities identified in the report:

    1. Reduce Friction in the Hybrid Operating Model
    2. Improve Your Ransomware Readiness
    3. Support an Employee-Centric Retention Strategy
    4. Design an Automation Platform
    5. Prepare to Report on New Environmental, Social, and Governance Metrics

    Impact and Result

    Update your strategic roadmap to include priorities that are critical and relevant for your organization based on a balance of external and internal factors.

    CIO Priorities 2022 Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. CIO Priorities 2022 – A report on the key priorities for competing in the digital economy.

    Discover Info-Tech’s five priorities for CIOs in 2022.

    • CIO Priorities Report for 2022

    2. Listen to the podcast series

    Hear directly from our contributing experts as they discuss their case studies with Brian Jackson.

    • Frictionless hybrid working: How the Harvard Business School did it
    • Close call with ransomware: A CIO recounts a near security nightmare
    • How a financial services company dodged "The Great Resignation"
    • How Allianz took a blockchain platform from pilot to 1 million transactions
    • CVS Health chairman David Dorman on healthcare's hybrid future

    Infographic

    Further reading

    CIO Priorities 2022

    A jumble of business-related words. Info-Tech’s 2022 Tech Trends survey asked CIOs for their top three priorities. Cluster analysis of their open-ended responses shows four key themes:
    1. Business process improvements
    2. Digital transformation or modernization
    3. Security
    4. Supporting revenue growth or recovery

    Info-Tech’s annual CIO priorities are formed from proprietary primary data and consultation with our internal experts with CIO stature

    2022 Tech Trends Survey CIO Demographic N=123

    Info-Tech’s Tech Trends 2022 survey was conducted between August and September 2021 and collected a total of 475 responses from IT decision makers, 123 of which were at the C-level. Fourteen countries and 16 industries are represented in the survey.

    2022 IT Talent Trends Survey CIO Demographic N=44

    Info-Tech’s IT Talent Trends 2022 survey was conducted between September and October 2021 and collected a total of 245 responses from IT decision makers, 44 of which were at the C-level. A broad range of countries from around the world are represented in the survey.

    Internal CIO Panels’ 125 Years Of Combined C-Level IT Experience

    Panels of former CIOs at Info-Tech focused on interpreting tech trends data and relating it to client experiences. Panels were conducted between November 2021 and January 2022.

    CEO-CIO Alignment Survey Benchmark Completed By 107 Different Organizations

    Info-Tech’s CEO-CIO Alignment program helps CIOs align with their supervisors by asking the right questions to ensure that IT stays on the right path. It determines how IT can best support the business’ top priorities and address the gaps in your strategy. In 2021, the benchmark was formed by 107 different organizations.

    Build IT alignment

    IT Management & Governance Diagnostic Benchmark Completed By 320 Different Organizations

    Info-Tech’s Management and Governance Diagnostic helps IT departments assess their strengths and weaknesses, prioritize their processes and build an improvement roadmap, and establish clear ownership of IT processes. In 2021, the benchmark was formed by data from 320 different organizations.

    Assess your IT processes

    The CIO priorities are informed by Info-Tech’s trends research reports and surveys

    Priority: “The fact or condition of being regarded or treated as more important than others.” (Lexico/Oxford)

    Trend: “A general direction in which something is developing or changing.” (Lexico/Oxford)

    A sequence of processes beginning with 'Sensing', 'Hypothesis', 'Validation', and ending with 'Trends, 'Priorities'. Under Sensing is Technology Research, Interviews & Insights, Gathering, and PESTLE. Under Hypothesis is Near-Future Probabilities, Identify Patterns, Identify Uncertainties, and Identify Human Benefits. Under Validation is Test Hypothesis, Case Studies, and Data-Driven Insights. Under Trends is Technology, Talent, and Industry. Under Priorities is CIO, Applications, Infrastructure, and Security.

    Visit Info-Tech’s Trends & Priorities Research Center

    Image called 'Defining the CIO Priorities for 2022'. Image shows 4 columns, Implications, Resource Investment, Amplifiers, and Actions and Outcomes, with 2 dotted lines, labeled External Context and Internal Context, running through all 4 columns and leading to bottom-right label called CIO Priorities Formed

    The Five Priorities

    Priorities to compete in the digital economy

    1. Reduce Friction in the Hybrid Operating Model
    2. Improve Your Ransomware Readiness
    3. Support an Employee-Centric Retention Strategy
    4. Design an Automation Platform
    5. Prepare to Report on New Environmental, Social, and Governance Metrics

    Reduce friction in the hybrid operating model

    Priority 01 | APO07 Human Resources Management

    Deliver solutions that create equity between remote workers and office workers and make collaboration a joy.

    Hybrid work is here to stay

    CIOs must deal with new pain points related to friction of collaboration

    In 2020, CIOs adapted to the pandemic’s disruption to offices by investing in capabilities to enable remote work. With restrictions on gathering in offices, even digital laggards had to shift to an all-remote work model for non-essential workers.

    Most popular technologies already invested in to facilitate better collaboration

    • 24% Web Conferencing
    • 23% Instant Messaging
    • 20% Document Collaboration

    In 2022, the focus shifts to solving problems created by the new hybrid operating model where some employees are in the office and some are working remotely. Without the ease of collaborating in a central hub, technology can play a role in reducing friction in several areas:

    • Foster more connections between employees. Remote workers are less likely to collaborate with people outside of their department and less likely to spontaneously collaborate with their peers. CIOs should provide a digital employee experience that fosters collaboration habits and keeps workers engaged.
    • Prevent employee attrition. With more workers reevaluating their careers and leaving their jobs, CIOs can help employees feel connected to the overall purpose of the organization. Finding a way to maintain culture in the new context will require new solutions. While conference room technology can be a bane to IT departments, making hybrid meetings effortless to facilitate will be more important.
    • Provide new standards for mediated collaboration. Meeting isn’t as easy as simply gathering around the same table anymore. CIOs need to provide structure around how hybrid meetings are conducted to create equity between all participants. Business continuity processes must also consider potential outages for collaboration services so employees can continue the work despite a major outage.

    Three in four organizations have a “hybrid” approach to work. (Tech Trends 2022 Survey)

    In most organizations, a hybrid model is being implemented. Only 14.9% of organizations are planning for almost everyone to return to the office, and only 9.9% for almost everyone to work remotely.

    Elizabeth Clark

    CIO, Harvard Business School

    "I want to create experiences that are sticky. That keep people coming back and engaging with their colleagues."

    Photo of Elizabeth Clark, CIO, Harvard Business School.

    Listen to the Tech Insights podcast:
    Frictionless hybrid working: How the Harvard Business School did it

    Internal interpretation: Harvard Business School

    • March 2020
      The pandemic disrupts in-class education at Harvard Business School. Their case study method of instruction that depends on in-person, high-quality student engagement is at risk. While students and faculty completed the winter semester remotely, the Dean and administration make the goal to restore the integrity of the classroom experience with equity for both remote and in-person students.
    • May 2020
      A cross-functional task force of about 100 people work intensively, conducting seven formal experiments, 80 smaller tests, and hundreds of polling data points, and a technology and facilities solution is designed: two 4K video cameras capturing both the faculty and the in-class students, new ceiling mics, three 85-inch TV screens, and students joining the videoconference from their laptops. A custom Zoom room, combining three separate rooms, integrated all the elements in one place and integrated with the lecture capture system and learning management system.
    • October 2020
      Sixteen classrooms are renovated to install the new solution. Students return to the classroom but in lower numbers due to limits on in-room capacity, but students rotate between the in-person and remote experience.
    • September 2021
      Renovations for the hybrid solution are complete in 26 classrooms and HBS has determined this will be its standard model for the classroom. The case method of teaching is kept alive and faculty and students are thrilled with the results.
    • November 2021
      HBS is adapting its solution for the classroom to its conference rooms and has built out eight different rooms for a hybrid experience. The 4K cameras and TV screens capture all participants in high fidelity as well as the blackboard.

    Photo of a renovated classroom with Zoom participants integrated with the in-person students.
    The renovated classrooms integrate all students, whether they are participating remotely or in person. (Image courtesy of Harvard Business School.)

    Implications: Organization, Process, Technology

    External

    • Organization – About half of IT practitioners in the Tech Trends 2022 survey feel that IT leaders, infrastructure and operations teams, and security teams were “very busy” in 2021. Capacity to adapt to hybrid work could be constrained by these factors.
    • Process – Organizations that want employees to benefit from being back in the office will have to rethink how workers can get more value out of in-person meetings that also require videoconference participation with remote workers.
    • Technology – Fifty-four percent of surveyed IT practitioners say the pandemic raised IT spending compared to the projections they made in 2020. Much of that investment went into adapting to a remote work environment.

    Internal

    • Organization – HBS added 30 people to its IT staff on term appointments to develop and implement its hybrid classroom solutions. Hires included instructional designers, support technicians, coordinators, and project managers.
    • Process – Only 25 students out of the full capacity of 95 could be in the classroom due to COVID-19 regulations. On-campus students rotated through the classroom seats. An app was created to post last-minute seat availability to keep the class full.
    • Technology – A Zoom room was created that combines three rooms to provide the full classroom experience: a view of the instructor, a clear view of each student that enlarges when they are speaking, and a view of the blackboard.

    Resources Applied

    Appetite for Technology

    CIOs and their direct supervisors both ranked internal collaboration tools as being a “critical need to adopt” in 2021, according to Info-Tech’s CEO-CIO Alignment Benchmark Report.

    Intent to Invest

    Ninety-seven percent of IT practitioners plan to invest in technology to facilitate better collaboration between employees in the office and outside the office by the end of 2022, according to Info-Tech’s 2022 Tech Trends survey.

    “We got so many nice compliments, which you don’t get in IT all the time. You get all the complaints, but it’s a rare case when people are enthusiastic about something that was delivered.” (Elizabeth Clark, CIO, Harvard Business School)

    Harvard Business School

    • IT staff were reassigned from other projects to prioritize building a hybrid classroom solution. A cloud migration and other portfolio projects were put on pause.
    • The annual capital A/V investment was doubled. The amount of spend on conference rooms was tripled.
    • Employees were hired to the media services team at a time when other areas of the organization were frozen.

    Outcomes at Harvard Business School

    The new normal at Harvard Business School

    New normal: HBS has found its new default operating model for the classroom and is extending its solution to its operating environment.

    Improved CX: The high-quality experience for students has helped avoid attrition despite the challenges of the pandemic.

    Engaged employees: The IT team is also engaged and feels connected to the mission of the school.

    Photo of a custom Zoom room bringing together multiple view of the classroom as well as all remote students.
    A custom Zoom room brings together multiple different views of the classroom into one single experience for remote students. (Image courtesy of Harvard Business School.)

    From Priorities to Action

    Make hybrid collaboration a joy

    Align with your organization’s goals for collaboration and customer interaction, with the target of high satisfaction for both customers and employees. Invest in capital projects to improve the fidelity of conference rooms, develop and test a new way of working, and increase IT capacity to alleviate pressure points.

    Foster both asynchronous and synchronous collaboration approaches to avoid calendars filling up with videoconference meetings to get things done and to accommodate workers contributing from across different time zones.

    “We’ll always have hybrid now. It’s opened people’s eyes and now we’re thinking about the future state. What new markets could we explore?” (Elizabeth Clark, CIO, Harvard Business School)

    Take the next step

    Run Better Meetings
    Hybrid, virtual, or in person – set meeting best practices that support your desired meeting norms.

    Prepare People Leaders for the Hybrid Work Environment
    Set hybrid work up for success by providing people leaders with the tools they need to lead within the new model.

    Hoteling and Hot-Desking: A Primer
    What you need to know regarding facilities, IT infrastructure, maintenance, security, and vendor solutions for desk hoteling and hot-desking.

    “Human Resources Management” gap between importance and effectiveness
    Info-Tech Research Group Management and Governance Diagnostic Benchmark 2021

    A bar chart illustrating the Human Resources Management gap between importance and effectiveness. The difference is marked as Delta 2.3.

    Improve your ransomware readiness

    Priority 02 | APO13 Security Strategy

    Mitigate the damage of successful ransomware intrusions and make recovery as painless as possible.

    The ransomware crisis threatens every organization

    Prevention alone won’t be enough against the forces behind ransomware.

    Cybersecurity is always top of mind for CIOs but tends to be deprioritized due to other demands related to digital transformation or due to cost pressures. That’s the case when we examine our data for this report.

    Cybersecurity ranked as the fourth-most important priority by CIOs in Info-Tech’s 2022 Tech Trends survey, behind business process improvement, digital transformation, and modernization. Popular ways to prepare for a successful attack include creating offline backups, purchasing insurance, and deploying new solutions to eradicate ransomware.

    CIOs and their direct supervisors ranked “Manage IT-Related Security” as the third-most important top IT priority on Info-Tech’s CEO-CIO Alignment Benchmark for 2021, in support of business goals to manage risk, comply with external regulation, and ensure service continuity.

    Most popular ways for organizations to prepare for the event of a successful ransomware attack:

    • 25% Created offline backups
    • 18% Purchased cyberinsurance
    • 19% New tech to eradicate ransomware

    Whatever priority an organization places on cybersecurity, when ransomware strikes, it quickly becomes a red alert scenario that disrupts normal operations and requires all hands on deck to respond. Sophisticated attacks executed at wide scale demonstrate that security can be bypassed without creating an alert. After that’s accomplished, the perpetrators build their leverage by exfiltrating data and encrypting critical systems.

    CIOs can plan to mitigate ransomware attacks in several constructive ways:

    • Business impact analysis. Determine the costs of an outage for specific periods and the system and data recovery points in time.
    • Engage a partner for 24/7 monitoring. Gain real-time awareness of your critical systems.
    • Review your identity access management (IAM) policies. Use of multi-factor authentication and limiting access to only the roles that need it reduces ransomware risk.

    50% of all organizations spent time and money specifically to prevent ransomware in the past year. (Info-Tech Tech Trends 2022 Survey)

    John Doe

    CIO, mid-sized manufacturing firm in the US

    "I want to create experiences that are sticky. That keep people coming back and engaging with their colleagues."

    Blank photo.

    Listen to the Tech Insights podcast:
    Close call with ransomware: a CIO recounts a near security nightmare

    Internal interpretation: US-based, mid-sized manufacturing firm

    • May 1, 2021
      A mid-sized manufacturing firm (“The Firm”) CIO gets a call from his head of security about odd things happening on the network. A call is made to Microsoft for support. Later that night, the report is that an unwanted crypto-mining application is the culprit. But a couple of hours later, that assessment is proven wrong when it’s realized that hundreds of systems are staged for a ransomware attack. All the attacker has to do is push the button.
    • May 2, 2021
      The Firm disconnects all its global sites to cut off new pathways for the malware to infect. All normal operations cease for 24 hours. It launches its cybersecurity insurance process. The CIO engages a new security vendor, CrowdStrike, to help respond. Employees begin working from home if they can so they can make use of their own internet service. The Firm has cut off its public internet connectivity and is severed from cloud services such as Azure storage and collaboration software.
    • May 4, 2021
      The hackers behind the attack are revealed by security forensics experts. A state-sponsored agency in Russia set up the ransomware and left it ready to execute. It sold the staged attack to a cybercriminal group, Doppel Spider. According to CrowdStrike, the group uses malware to run “big game hunting operations” and targets 18 different countries including the US and multiple industries, including manufacturing.
    • May 10, 2021
      The Firm has totally recovered from the ransomware incident and avoided any serious breach or paying a ransom. The CIO worked more hours than at any other point in his career, logging an estimated 130 hours over the two weeks.
    • November 2021
      The Firm never previously considered itself a ransomware target but has now reevaluated that stance. It has hired a service provider to run a security operations center on a 24/7 basis. It's implemented a more sophisticated detection and response model and implemented multi-factor authentication. It’s doubled its security spend in 2021 and will invest more in 2022.

    “Now we take the approach that if someone does get in, we're going to find them out.” (John Doe, CIO, “The Firm”)

    Implications: Organization, Process, Technology

    External

    • Organization – Organizations must consider how their employees play a role in preventing ransomware and plan for training to recognize phishing and other common traps. They must make plans for employees to continue their work if systems are disrupted by ransomware.
    • Process – Backup processes across multiple systems should be harmonized to have both recent and common points to recover from. Work with the understanding IT will have to take systems offline if ransomware is discovered and there is no time to ask for permission.
    • Technology – Organizations can benefit from security services provided by a forensics-focused vendor. Putting cybersecurity insurance in place not only provides financial protection but also guidance in what to do and which vendors to work with to prevent and recover from ransomware.

    Internal

    • Organization – The Firm was prepared with a business continuity plan to allow many of its employees to work remotely, which was necessary because the office network was incapacitated for ten days during recovery.
    • Process – Executives didn’t seek to assign blame for the security incident but took it as a signal there were some new costs involved to stay in business. It initiated new outsource relationships and hired one more full-time employee to shore up security resources.
    • Technology – New ransomware eradication software was deployed to 2,000 computers. Scripted processes automated much of the work, but in some cases full system rebuilds were required. Backup systems were disconnected from the network as soon as the malware was discovered.

    Resources Applied

    Consider the Alternative

    Organizations should consider how much a ransomware attack on critical systems would cost them if they were down for a minimum of 24-48 hours. Plan to invest an amount at least equal to the costs of that downtime.

    Ask for ID

    Implementing across-the-board multi-factor authentication reduces chances of infection and is cheap, with enterprise solutions ranging from $2 to $5 per user on average. Be strict and deny access when connections don’t authenticate.

    “You'll never stop everything from getting into the network. You can still focus on stopping the bad actors, but then if they do make it in, make sure they don't get far.” (John Doe, CIO, “The Firm”)

    “The Firm” (Mid-Sized Manufacturer)

    • During the crisis, The Firm paused all activities and focused solely on isolating and eliminating the ransomware threat.
    • New outsourcing relationship with a vendor provides a 24/7 Security Operations Center.
    • One more full-time employee on the security team.
    • Doubled investment in security in 2021 and will spend more in 2022.

    Outcomes at “The Firm” (Mid-Sized Manufacturer)

    The new cost of doing business

    Real-time security: While The Firm is still investing in prevention-based security, it is also developing its real-time detection and response capabilities. When ransomware makes it through the cracks, it wants to know as soon as possible and stop it.

    Leadership commitment: The C-suite is taking the experience as a wake-up call that more investment is required in today’s threat landscape. The Firm rates security more highly as an overall organizational goal, not just something for IT to worry about.

    Stock photo of someone using their phone while sitting at a computer, implying multi-factor authentication.
    The Firm now uses multi-factor authentication as part of its employee sign-on process. For employees, authenticating is commonly achieved by using a mobile app that receives a secret code from the issuer.

    From Priorities to Action

    Cybersecurity is everyone’s responsibility

    In Info-Tech’s CEO-CIO Alignment Benchmark for 2021, the business goal of “Manage Risk” was the single biggest point of disagreement between CIOs and their direct supervisors. CIOs rank it as the second-most important business goal, while CEOs rank it as sixth-most important.

    Organizations should align on managing risk as a top priority given the severity of the ransomware threat. The threat actors and nature of the attacks are such that top leadership must prepare for when ransomware hits. This includes halting operations quickly to contain damage, engaging third-party security forensics experts, and coordinating with government regulators.

    Cybersecurity strategies may be challenged to be effective without creating some friction for users. Organizations should look beyond multi-layer prevention strategies and lean toward quick detection and response, spending evenly across prevention, detection, and response solutions.

    Take the next step

    Create a Ransomware Incident Response Plan
    Don’t be the next headline. Determine your current readiness, response plan, and projects to close gaps.

    Simplify Identity and Access Management
    Select and implement IAM and produce vendor RFPs that will contain the capabilities you need, including multi-factor authentication.

    Cybersecurity Series Featuring Sandy Silk
    More from Info-Tech’s Senior Workshop Director Sandy Silk in this video series created while she was still at Harvard University.

    Gap between CIOs and CEOs in points allocated to “Manage risk” as a top business goal

    A bar chart illustrating the gap between CIOs and CEOs in points allocated to 'Manage risk' as a top business goal. The difference is marked as Delta 1.5.

    Support an employee-centric retention strategy

    Priority 03 | ITRG02 Leadership, Culture & Values

    Avoid being a victim of “The Great Resignation” by putting employees at the center of an experience that will engage them with clear career path development, purposeful work, and transparent feedback.

    Defining an employee-first culture that improves retention

    The Great resignation isn’t good for firms

    In 2021, many workers decided to leave their jobs. Working contexts were disrupted by the pandemic and that saw non-essential workers sent home to work, while essential workers were asked to continue to come into work despite the risks of COVID-19. These disruptions may have contributed to many workers reevaluating their professional goals and weighing their values differently. At the same time, 2021 saw a surging economy and many new job opportunities to create a talent-hungry market. Many workers could have been motivated to take a new opportunity to increase their salary or receive other benefits such as more flexibility.

    Annual turnover rate for all us employees on the rise

    • 20% – Jan.-Aug. 2020, Dipped from 22% in 2019
    • 25% Jan.-Aug. 2021, New record high
    • Data from Visier Inc.

    When you can’t pay them, develop them

    IT may be less affected than other departments by this trend. Info-Tech’s 2022 IT Talent Trends Report shows that on average, estimated turnover rate in IT is lower than the rest of the organization. Almost half of respondents estimated their organization’s voluntary turnover rate was 10% or higher. Only 30% of respondents estimate that IT’s voluntary turnover rate is in the same range. However, CIOs working in industries with the highest turnover rates will have to work to keep their workers engaged and satisfied, as IT skills are easily transferred to other industries.

    49% ranked “enabling learning & development within IT” as high priority, more than any other single challenge. (IT Talent Trends 2022 Survey, N=227)

    A bar chart of 'Industries with highest turnover rates (%)' with 'Leisure and Hospitality' at 6.4%, 'Trade, Transportation & Utilities' at 3.6%, 'Professional and Business' at 3.3%, and 'Other Services' at 3.1%. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2022.

    Jeff Previte

    Executive Vice-President of IT, CrossCountry Mortgage

    “We have to get to know the individual at a personal level … Not just talking about the business, but getting to know the person."

    Photo of Jeff Previte, Executive Vice-President of IT, CrossCountry Mortgage.

    Listen to the Tech Insights podcast:
    How a financial services company dodged ‘The Great Resignation’

    Internal interpretation: CrossCountry Mortgage

    • May 2019
      Jeff Previte joins Cleveland, Ohio-based CrossCountry Mortgage in the CIO role. The company faces a challenge with employee turnover, particularly in IT. The firm is a sales-focused organization and saw its turnover rate reach as high as 60%. Yet Previte recognized that IT had some meaningful goals to achieve and would need to attract – and retain – some higher caliber talent. His first objective in his new role was to meet with IT employees and business leadership to set priorities.
    • July 2019
      Previte takes a “people-first” approach to leadership and meets his staff face-to-face to understand their personal situations. He sets to work on defining roles and responsibilities in the organization, spending about a fifth of his time on defining the strategy.
    • June 2020
      Previte assigned his leadership team to McLean & Company’s Design an Impactful Employee Development Program. From there, the team developed a Salesforce tool called the Career Development Workbook. “We had some very passionate developers and admins that wanted to build a home-grown tool,” he says. It turns McLean & Company’s process into a digital tool employees can use to reflect on their careers and explore their next steps. It helps facilitate development conversations with managers.
    • January 2021
      CrossCountry Mortgage changes its approach to career development activities. Going to external conferences and training courses is reduced to just 30% of that effort. The rest is by doing hands-on work at the company. Previte aligned with his executives and road-mapped IT projects annually. Based on employee’s interests, opportunities are found to carve out time from usual day-to-day activities to spend time on a project in a new area. When there’s a business need, someone internally can be ready to transition roles.
    • June 2021
      In the two years since joining the company, Previte has reduced the turnover rate to just 12%. The IT department has grown to more adequately meet the needs of the business and employees are engaged with more opportunities to develop their careers. Instead of focusing on compensation, Previte focused more on engaging employees with a developmentally dedicated environment and continuous hands-on learning.

    “It’s come down to a culture shift. Folks have an idea of where we’re headed as an organization, where we’re headed as an IT team, and how their role contributes to that.” (Jeff Previte, EVP of IT, CrossCountry Mortgage)

    Implications: Organization, Process, Technology

    External

    • Organization – A high priority is being placed on improving IT’s maturity through its talent. Enabling learning and development in IT, enabling departmental innovation, and recruiting are the top three highest priorities according to IT Talent Trends 2022 survey responses.
    • Process – Recruiting is more challenging for industries that operate primarily onsite, according to McLean & Company's 2022 HR Trends Report. They face more challenges attracting applications, more rejected offers, and more candidate ghosting compared to remote-capable industries.
    • Technology – Providing a great employee experience through digital tools is more important as many organizations see a mix of workers in the office and at home. These tools can help connect colleagues, foster professional development, and improve the candidate experience.

    Internal

    • Organization – CrossCountry Mortgage faced a situation where IT employees did not have clarity on their roles and responsibilities. In terms of salary, it wasn’t offering at the high end compared to other employers in Cleveland.
    • Process – To foster a culture of growth and development, CrossCountry Mortgage put in place a performance assessment system that encouraged reflection and goal setting, aided by collaboration with a manager.
    • Technology – The high turnover rate was limiting CrossCountry Mortgage from achieving the level of maturity it needed to support the company’s goals. It ingrained its new PA process with a custom build of a Salesforce tool.

    Resources Applied

    Show me the money

    Almost six in ten Talent Trends survey respondents identified salary and compensation as the reason that employees resigned in the past year. Organizations looking to engage employees must first pay a fair salary according to market and industry conditions.

    Build me up

    Professional development and opportunity for innovative work are the next two most common reasons for resignations. Organizations must ensure they create enough capacity to allow workers time to spend on development.

    “Building our own solution created an element of engagement. There was a sense of ownership that the team had in thinking through this.” (Jeff Previte, CrossCountry Mortgage)

    CrossCountry Mortgage

    • Executive time: CIO spends 10-20% of his time on activities related to designing the approach.
    • Leveraged memberships with Info-Tech Research Group and McLean & Company to define professional development process.
    • Internal IT develops automated workflow in Salesforce.
    • Hired additional IT staff to build out overall capacity and create time for development activities.

    Outcomes at CrossCountry Mortgage

    Engaged IT workforce

    The Great Maturation: IT staff turnover rate dropped to 10-12% and IT talent is developing on the job to improve the department’s overall skill level. More IT staff on hand and more engaged workers mean IT can deliver higher maturity level results.

    Alignment achieved: Connecting IT’s initiatives to the vision of the C-suite creates a clear purpose for IT in its initiatives. Staff understand what they need to achieve to progress their careers and can grow while they work.

    Photo of employees from CrossCountry Mortgage assisting with a distribution event.
    Employees from CrossCountry Mortgage headquarters assist with a drive-thru distribution event for the Cleveland Food Bank on Dec. 17, 2021. (Image courtesy of CrossCountry Mortgage.)

    From Priorities to Action

    Staff retention is a leadership priority

    The Great Resignation trend is bringing attention to employee engagement and staff retention. IT departments are busier than ever during the pandemic as they work overtime to keep up with a remote workforce and new security threats. At the same time, IT talent is among the most coveted on the market.

    CIOs need to develop a people-first approach to improve the employee experience. Beyond compensation, IT workers need clarity in terms of their career paths, a direct connection between their work and the goals of the organization, and time set aside for professional development.

    Info-Tech’s 2021 benchmark for “Leadership, Culture & Values” shows that most organizations rate this capability very highly (9) but see room to improve on their effectiveness (6.9).

    Take the next step

    IT Talent Trends 2022
    See how IT talent trends are shifting through the pandemic and understand how themes like The Great Resignation has impacted IT.

    McLean & Company’s Modernize Performance Management
    Customize the building blocks of performance management to best fit organizational needs to impact individual and organizational performance, productivity, and engagement.

    Redesign Your IT Organizational Structure
    Define future-state work units, roles, and responsibilities that will enable the IT organization to complete the work that needs to be done.

    “Leadership, Culture & Values” gap between importance and effectiveness
    Info-Tech Research Group Management and Governance Diagnostic Benchmark 2021

    A bar chart illustrating the 'Leadership, Culture & Values' gap between importance and effectiveness. The difference is marked as Delta 2.1.

    Design an automation platform

    Priority 04 | APO04 Innovation

    Position yourself to buy or build a platform that will enable new automation opportunities through seamless integration.

    Build it or buy it, but platform integration can yield great benefits

    Necessity is the mother of innovation

    When it’s said that digital transformation accelerated during the pandemic, what’s really meant is that processes that were formerly done manually became automated through software. In responses to the Tech Trends survey, CIOs say digital transformation was more of a focus during the pandemic, and eight in ten CIOs also say they shifted more than 20% of their organization’s processes to digital during the pandemic. Automating tasks through software can be called digitalization.

    Most organizations became more digitalized during the pandemic. But how they pursued it depends on their IT maturity. For digital laggards, partnering with a technology services platform is the path of least resistance. For sophisticated innovators, they can consider building a platform to address the specific needs of their business process. Doing so requires the foundation of an existing “digital factory” or innovation arm where new technologies can be tested, proofs of concept developed, and external partnerships formed. Patience is key with these efforts, as not every investment will yield immediate returns and some will fail outright.

    Build it or buy it, platform participants integrate with their existing systems through application programming interfaces (APIs). Organizations should determine their platform strategies based on maturity, then look to integrate the business processes that will yield the most gains.

    What role should you play in the platform ecosystem?

    A table with levels on the maturity ladder laid out as a sprint. Column headers are maturity levels 'Struggle', 'Support', 'Optimize', 'Expand', and 'Transform', row headers are 'Maturity' and 'Role'. Roles are assigned to one or many levels. 'Improve' is solely under Struggle. 'Integrate' spans from Support to Transform. 'Buy' spans Support to Expand. 'Build' begins midway through Expand and all of Transform. 'Partner' spans from Optimize to halfway through Transform.

    68% of CIOs say digital transformation became much more of a focus for their organization during the pandemic (Info-Tech Tech Trends 2022 Survey)

    Bob Crozier

    Chief Architect, Allianz Technology & Global Head of Blockchain, Allianz Technology SE

    "Smart contracts are really just workflows between counterparties."

    Photo of Bob Crozier, Chief Architect, Allianz Technology & Global Head of Blockchain, Allianz Technology SE.

    Listen to the Tech Insights podcast:
    How Allianz took a blockchain platform from pilot to 1 million transactions

    Internal interpretation: Allianz Technology

    • 2015
      After smart contracts are demonstrated on the Ethereum blockchain, Allianz and other insurers recognize the business value. There is potential to use the capability to administer a complex, multi-party contract where the presence of the reinsurer in the risk transfer ecosystem is required. Manual contracts could be turned into code and automated. Allianz organized an early proof of concept around a theoretical pandemic excessive loss contract.
    • 2018
      Allianz Chief Architect Bob Crozier is leading the Global Blockchain Center of Competence for Allianz. They educate Allianz on the value of blockchain for business. They also partner with a joint venture between the Technology University of Munich and the state of Bavaria. A cohort of Masters students is looking for real business problems to solve with open-source distributed ledger technology. Allianz puts its problem statement in front of the group. A student team presents a proof of concept for an international motor insurance claims settlement and it comes in second place at a pitch day competition.
    • 2019
      Allianz brings the concept back in-house, and its business leaders return to the concept. Startup Luther Systems is engaged to build a minimum-viable product for the solution, with the goal being a pilot involving three or four subsidiaries in different countries. The Blockchain Center begins communicating with 25 Allianz subsidiaries that will eventually deploy the platform.
    • 2020
      Allianz is in build mode on its international motor insurance claims platform. It leverages its internal Dev/SecOps teams based in Munich and in India.
    • May 2021
      Allianz goes live with its new platform on May 17, decommissioning its old system and migrating all live claims data onto the new blockchain platform. It sees 400 concurrent users go live across Europe.
    • January 2022
      Allianz mines its one-millionth block to its ledger on Jan. 19, with each block representing a peer-to-peer transaction across its 25 subsidiaries in different countries. The platform has settled hundreds of millions of dollars.

    Stock photo of two people arguing over a car crash.

    Implications: Organization, Process, Technology

    External

    • Organization – To explore emerging technologies like blockchain, organizations need staff that are accountable for innovation and have leeway to develop proofs of concept. External partners are often required to bring in fresh ideas and move quickly towards an MVP.
    • Process – According to the Tech Trends 2022 survey, 84% of CIOs consider automation a high-value digital capability, and 77% say identity verification is a high-value capability. A blockchain platform using smart contracts can deliver those.
    • Technology – The Linux Foundation’s Hyperledger Fabric is an open-source blockchain technology that’s become popular in the financial industry for its method of forming consensus and its modular architecture. It’s been adopted by USAA, MasterCard, and PayPal. It also underpins the IBM Blockchain Platform and is supported by Azure Blockchain.

    Internal

    • Organization – Allianz is a holding company that owns Allianz Technology and 25 operating entities across Europe. It uses the technology arm to innovate on the business process and creates shared platforms that its entities can integrate with to automate across the value chain.
    • Process – Initial interest in smart contracts on blockchain were funneled into a student competition, where a proof of concept was developed. Allianz partnered with a startup to develop an MVP, then developed the platform while aligning with its business units ahead of launch.
    • Technology – Allianz built its blockchain platform on Hyperledger Fabric because it was a permissioned system, unlike other public permissionless blockchains such as Ethereum, and because its mining mechanism was much more energy efficient compared to other blockchains using Proof of Work consensus models.

    Resources Applied

    Time to innovate

    Exploring emerging technology for potential use cases is difficult for staff tasked with running day-to-day operations. Organizations serious about innovation create a separate team that can focus on “moonshot” projects and connect with external partners.

    Long-term ROI

    Automation of new business processes often requires a high upfront initial investment for a long-term efficiency gain. A proof of concept should demonstrate clear business value that can be repeated often and for a long period.

    “My next project has to deliver in the tens of millions of value in return. The bar is high and that’s what it should be for a business of our size.” (Bob Crozier, Allianz)

    Allianz

    • Several operating entities from different countries supplied subject matter expertise and helped with the testing process.
    • Allianz Technology team has eight staff members. It is augmented by Luther Systems and the team at industry group B3i.
    • Funding of less than $5 million to develop. Dev team continues to add improvements.
    • Operating requires just one full-time employee plus infrastructure costs, mostly for public cloud hosting.

    Outcomes at Allianz

    From insurer to platform provider

    Deliver your own SaaS: Allianz Technology built its blockchain-based claims settlement platform and its subsidiaries consume it as software as a service. The platform runs on a distributed architecture across Europe, with each node running the same version of the software. Operating entities can also integrate their own systems to the platform via APIs and further automate business processes such as billing.

    Ready to scale: After processing one million transactions, the international claims settlement platform is proven and ready to add more participants. Crozier sees auto repair shops and auto manufacturers as the next logical users.

    Stock photo of Blockchain.
    Allianz is a shareholder of the Blockchain Insurance Industry Initiative (B3i). It is providing a platform used by a group of insurance companies in the commercial and reinsurance space.

    When should we use blockchain? THREE key criteria:

    • Redundant processes
      Different entities follow the same process to achieve the desired outcome.
    • Audit trail
      Accountability in the decision making must be documented.
    • Reconciliation
      Parties need to be able to resolve disputes by tracing back to the truth.

    From Priorities to Action

    It’s a build vs. buy question for platforms

    Allianz was able to build a platform for its group of European subsidiaries because of its established digital factory and commitment to innovation. Allianz Technology is at the “innovate” level of IT maturity, allowing it to create a platform that subsidiaries can integrate with via APIs. For firms that are lower on the IT maturity scale, buying a platform solution is the better path to automation. These firms will be concerned with integrating their legacy systems to platforms that can reduce the friction of their operating environments and introduce modern new capabilities.

    From Info-Tech’s Build a Winning Business Process Automation Playbook

    An infographic comparing pros and cons of Build versus Buy. On the 'Build: High Delivery Capacity & Capability' side is 'Custom Development', 'Data Integration', 'AI/ML', 'Configuration', 'Native Workflow', and 'Low & No Code'. On the 'Buy: Low Delivery Capacity & Capability' side is 'Outsource Development', 'iPaaS', 'Chatbots', 'iBPMS & Rules Engines', 'RPA', and 'Point Solutions'.

    Take the next step

    Accelerate Your Automation Processes
    Integrate automation solutions and take the first steps to building an automation suite.

    Build Effective Enterprise Integration on the Back of Business Process
    From the backend to the frontlines – let enterprise integration help your business processes fly.

    Evolve Your Business Through Innovation
    Innovation teams are tasked with the responsibility of ensuring that their organizations are in the best position to succeed while the world is in a period of turmoil, chaos, and uncertainty.

    “Innovation” gap between importance and effectiveness Info-Tech Research Group Management and Governance Diagnostic Benchmark 2021

    A bar chart illustrating the 'Innovation' gap between importance and effectiveness. The difference is marked as Delta 2.1.

    Prepare to report on new environmental, social, and governance (ESG) metrics

    Priority 05 | ITRG06 Business Intelligence and Reporting

    Be ready to either lead or support initiatives to meet the criteria of new ESG reporting mandates and work toward disclosure reporting solutions.

    Time to get serious about ESG

    What does CSR or ESG mean to a CIO?

    Humans are putting increasing pressure on the planet’s natural environment and creating catastrophic risks as a result. Efforts to mitigate these risks have been underway for the past 30 years, but in the decade ahead regulators are likely to impose more strict requirements that will be linked to the financial value of an organization. Various voluntary frameworks exist for reporting on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) or corporate social responsibility (CSR) metrics. But now there are efforts underway to unify and clarify those standards.

    The most advanced effort toward a global set of standards is in the environmental area. At the United Nations’ COP26 summit in Scotland last November, the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) announced its headquarters (Frankfurt) and three other international office locations (Montreal, San Francisco, and London) and its roadmap for public consultations. It is working with an array of voluntary standards groups toward a consensus.

    In Info-Tech’s 2022 Tech Trends survey, two-thirds of CIOs say their organization is committed to reducing greenhouse gas emissions, yet only 40% say their organizational leadership is very concerned with reducing those emissions. CIOs will need to consider how to align organizational concern with internal commitments and new regulatory pressures. They may investigate new real-time reporting solutions that could serve as a competitive differentiator on ESG.

    Standards informing the ISSB’s global set of climate standards

    A row of logos of organizations that inform ISSB's global set of climate standards.

    67% of CIOs say their organization is committed to reducing greenhouse gases, with one-third saying that commitment is public. (Info-Tech Tech Trends 2022 Survey)

    40% of CIOs say their organizational leadership is very concerned with reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

    David W. Dorman

    Chairman of the board, CVS Health

    “ESG is a question of what you do in the microcosm of your company to make sure there is a clear, level playing field – that there is a color-blind, gender-blind meritocracy available – that you are aware that not in every case can you achieve that without really focusing on it. It’s not going to happen on its own. That’s why our commitments have real dollars behind them and real focus behind them because we want to be the very best at doing them.”

    Photo of David W. Dorman, Chairman of the Board, CVS Health.

    Listen to the Tech Insights podcast:
    CVS Health chairman David Dorman on healthcare's hybrid future

    Internal interpretation: CVS Health

    CVS Health established a new steering committee of senior leaders in 2020 to oversee ESG commitments. It designs its corporate social responsibility strategy, Transform Health 2030, by aligning company activities in four key areas: healthy people, healthy business, healthy planet, and healthy community. The strategy aligns with the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals. In alignment with these goals, CVS identifies material topics where the company has the most ability to make an impact. In 2020, its top three topics were:

    1. Access to quality health care
    2. Patient and customer safety
    3. Data protection and privacy
    Material Topic
    Access to quality health care
    Material Topic
    Patient and customer safety
    Material Topic
    Data protection and privacy
    Technology Initiative
    MinuteClinic’s Virtual Collaboration for Nurses

    CVS provided Apple iPads compliant with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) to clinics in a phased approach, providing training to more than 700 providers in 26 states by February 2021. Nurses could use the iPads to attend virtual morning huddles and access clinical education. Nurses could connect virtually with other healthcare experts to collaborate on delivering patient care in real-time. The project was able to scale across the country through a $50,000 American Nurses Credentialing Center Pathway Award. (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

    Technology Initiative
    MinuteClinic’s E-Clinic

    MinuteClinics launched this telehealth solution in response to the pandemic, rolling it out in three weeks. The solution complemented video visits delivered in partnership with the Teladoc platform. Visits cost $59 and are covered by Aetna insurance plans, a subsidiary of CVS Health. It hosted more than 20,000 E-Clinic visits through the end of 2020. CVS connected its HealthHUBs to the solution to increase capacity in place of walk-in appointments and managed patients via phone for medication adherence and care plans. CVS also helped behavioral health providers transition patients to virtual visits. (CVS Health)

    Technology Initiative
    Next Generation Authentication Platform

    CVS patented this solution to authenticate customers accessing digital channels. It makes use of the available biometrics data and contextual information to validate identity without the need for a password. CVS planned to extend the platform to voice channels as well, using voiceprint technology. The solution prevents unauthorized access to sensitive health data while providing seamless access for customers. (LinkedIn)

    Implications: Organization, Process, Technology

    External

    • Organization – Since the mid-2010s, younger investors have demonstrated reliance on ESG data when making investment decisions, resulting in the creation of voluntary standards that offered varied approaches. Organizations in ESG exchange-traded funds are outperforming the overall S&P 500 (S&P Global Market Intelligence).
    • Process – Organizations are issuing ESG reports today despite the absence of clear rules to follow for reporting results. With regulators expected to step in to establish more rigid guidelines, many organizations will need to revisit their approach to ESG reports.
    • Technology – Real-time reporting of ESG metrics will become a competitive advantage before 2030. Engineering a solution that can alert organizations to poor performance on ESG measures and allow them to respond could avert losing market value.

    Internal

    • Organization – CVS Health established an ESG Steering Committee in 2020 composed of senior leaders including its chief governance officers, chief sustainability officer, chief risk officer, and controller and SVP of investor relations. It is supported by the ESG Operating Committee.
    • Process – CVS conducts a materiality assessment in accordance with Global Reporting Initiative standards to determine the most significant ESG impacts it can make and what topics most influence the decisions of stakeholders. It engages with various stakeholder groups on CSR topics.
    • Technology – CVS technology initiatives during the pandemic focused on supporting patients and employees in collaborating on health care delivery using virtual solutions, providing rich digital experiences that are easily accessible while upholding high security and privacy standards.

    Resources Applied

    Lack of commitment

    While 83% of businesses state support for the Sustainable Development Goals outlined by the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), only 40% make measurable commitments to their goals.

    Show your work

    The GRI recommends organizations not only align their activities with sustainable development goals but also demonstrate contributions to specific targets in reporting on the positive actions they carry out. (GRI, “State of Progress: Business Contributions to the SDGS.”)

    “We end up with a longstanding commitment to diversity because that’s what our customer base looks like.” (David Dorman, CVS Health)

    CVS Health

    • The MinuteClinic Virtual Collaboration solution was piloted in Houston, demonstrated success, and won additional $50,000 funding from the Pathway to Excellence Award to scale the program across the country (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.).
    • The Next-Gen Authentication solution is provided by the vendor HYPR. It is deployed to ten million users and looking to scale to 30 million more. Pricing for enterprises is quoted at $1 per user, but volume pricing would apply to CVS (HYPR).

    Outcomes at CVS Health

    Delivering on hybrid healthcare solutions

    iPads for collaboration: Healthcare practitioners in the MinuteClinic Virtual Collaboration initiative agreed that it improved the use of interprofessional teams, working well virtually with others, and improved access to professional resources (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

    Remote healthcare: Saw a 400% increase in MinuteClinic virtual visits in 2020 (CVS Health).

    Verified ID: The Next Generation Authentication platform allowed customers to register for a COVID-19 vaccination appointment. CVS has delivered more than 50 million vaccines (LinkedIn).

    Stock photo of a doctor with an iPad.
    CVS Health is making use of digital channels to connect its customers and health practitioners to a services platform that can supplement visits to a retail or clinic location to receive diagnostics and first-hand care.

    From Priorities to Action

    Become your organization’s ESG Expert

    The risks posed to organizations and wider society are becoming more severe, driving a transition from voluntary frameworks for ESG goals to a mandatory one that’s enforced by investors and governments. Organizations will be expected to tie their core activities to a defined set of ESG goals and maintain a balance sheet of their positive and negative impacts. CIOs should become experts in ESG disclosure requirements and recommend the steps needed to meet or exceed competitors’ efforts. If a leadership vacuum for ESG accountability exists, CIOs can either seek to support their peers that are likely to become accountable or take a leadership role in overseeing the area. CIOs should start working toward solutions that deliver real-time reporting on ESG goals to make reporting frictionless.

    “If you don’t have ESG oversight at the highest levels of the company, it won’t wind up getting the focus. That’s why we review it at the Board multiple times per year. We have an annual report, we compare how we did, what we intended to do, where did we fall short, where did we exceed, and where we can run for daylight to do more.” (David Dorman, CVS Health)

    Take the next step

    ESG Disclosures: How Will We Record Status Updates on the World We Are Creating?
    Prepare for the era of mandated environmental, social, and governance disclosures.

    Private Equity and Venture Capital Growing Impact of ESG Report
    Learn about how the growing impact of ESG affects both your organization and IT specifically, including challenges and opportunities, with expert assistance.

    “Business Intelligence and Reporting” gap between importance and effectiveness
    Info-Tech Research Group Management and Governance Diagnostic Benchmark 2021

    A bar chart illustrating the 'BI and Reporting' gap between importance and effectiveness. The difference is marked as Delta 2.4.

    The Five Priorities

    Priorities to compete in the digital economy

    1. Reduce Friction in the Hybrid Operating Model
    2. Improve Your Ransomware Readiness
    3. Support an Employee-Centric Retention Strategy
    4. Design an Automation Platform
    5. Prepare to Report on New Environmental, Social, and Governance Metrics

    Contributing Experts

    Elizabeth Clark

    CIO, Harvard Business School
    Photo of Elizabeth Clark, CIO, Harvard Business School.

    Jeff Previte

    Executive Vice-President of IT, CrossCountry Mortgage
    Photo of Jeff Previte, Executive Vice-President of IT, CrossCountry Mortgage.

    Bob Crozier

    Chief Architect, Allianz Technology & Global Head of Blockchain, Allianz Technology SE
    Photo of Bob Crozier, Chief Architect, Allianz Technology & Global Head of Blockchain, Allianz Technology SE.

    David W. Dorman

    Chairman of the Board, CVS Health
    Photo of David W. Dorman, Chairman of the Board, CVS Health.

    Info-Tech’s internal CIO panel contributors

    • Bryan Tutor
    • John Kemp
    • Mike Schembri
    • Janice Clatterbuck
    • Sandy Silk
    • Sallie Wright
    • David Wallace
    • Ken McGee
    • Mike Tweedie
    • Cole Cioran
    • Kevin Tucker
    • Angelina Atkins
    • Yakov Kofner
    Photo of an internal CIO panel contributor. Photo of an internal CIO panel contributor.Photo of an internal CIO panel contributor.
    Photo of an internal CIO panel contributor.Photo of an internal CIO panel contributor.Photo of an internal CIO panel contributor.Photo of an internal CIO panel contributor.
    Photo of an internal CIO panel contributor.Photo of an internal CIO panel contributor.Photo of an internal CIO panel contributor.

    Thank you for your support

    Logo for the Blockchain Research Institute.
    Blockchain Research Institute

    Bibliography – CIO Priorities 2022

    “2020 Corporate Social Responsibility Report.” CVS Health, 2020, p. 127. Web.

    “Adversary: Doppel Spider - Threat Actor.” Crowdstrike Adversary Universe, 2021. Accessed 29 Dec. 2021.

    “Aetna CVS Health Success Story.” HYPR, n.d. Accessed 6 Feb. 2022.

    Baig, Aamer. “The CIO agenda for the next 12 months: Six make-or-break priorities.” McKinsey Digital, 1 Nov. 2021. Web.

    Ball, Sarah, Kristene Diggins, Nairobi Martindale, Angela Patterson, Anne M. Pohnert, Jacinta Thomas, Tammy Todd, and Melissa Bates. “2020 ANCC Pathway Award® winner.” Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc., 2021. Accessed 6 Feb. 2022.

    “Canadian Universities Propose Designs for a Central Bank Digital Currency.” Bank of Canada, 11 Feb. 2021. Accessed 14 Dec. 2021.

    “Carbon Sequestration in Wetlands.” MN Board of Water and Soil Resources, n.d. Accessed 15 Nov. 2021.

    “CCM Honored as a NorthCoast 99 Award Winner.” CrossCountry Mortgage, 1 Dec. 2021. Web.

    Cheek, Catherine. “Four Things We Learned About the Resignation Wave–and What to Do Next.” Visier Inc. (blog), 5 Oct. 2021. Web.

    “Companies Using Hyperledger Fabric, Market Share, Customers and Competitors.” HG Insights, 2022. Accessed 25 Jan. 2022.

    “IFRS Foundation Announces International Sustainability Standards Board, Consolidation with CDSB and VRF, and Publication of Prototype Disclosure Requirements.” IFRS, 3 Nov. 2021. Web.

    “IT Priorities for 2022: A CIO Report.” Mindsight, 28 Oct. 2021. Web.

    “Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey.” Databases, Tables & Calculators by Subject, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2022. Accessed 9 Feb. 2022.

    Kumar, Rashmi, and Michael Krigsman. “CIO Planning and Investment Strategy 2022.” CXOTalk, 13 Sept. 2021. Web.

    Leonhardt, Megan. “The Great Resignation Is Hitting These Industries Hardest.” Fortune, 16 Nov. 2021. Accessed 7 Jan. 2022.

    “Most companies align with SDGs – but more to do on assessing progress.” Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), 17 Jan. 2022. Web.

    Navagamuwa, Roshan. “Beyond Passwords: Enhancing Data Protection and Consumer Experience.” LinkedIn, 15 Dec. 2020.

    Ojo, Oluwaseyi. “Achieving Digital Business Transformation Using COBIT 2019.” ISACA, 19 Aug. 2019. Web.

    “Priority.” Lexico.com, Oxford University Press, 2021. Web.

    Riebold, Jan, and Yannick Bartens. “Reinventing the Digital IT Operating Model for the ‘New Normal.’” Capgemini Worldwide, 3 Nov. 2020. Web.

    Samuels, Mark. “The CIO’s next priority: Using the tech budget for growth.” ZDNet, 1 Sept. 2021. Accessed 1 Nov. 2021.

    Sayer, Peter. “Exclusive Survey: CIOs Outline Tech Priorities for 2021-22.” CIO, 5 Oct. 2021. Web.

    Shacklett, Mary E. “Where IT Leaders Are Likely to Spend Budget in 2022.” InformationWeek, 10 Aug. 2021. Web.

    “Table 4. Quits Levels and Rates by Industry and Region, Seasonally Adjusted - 2021 M11 Results.” U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Economic News Release, 1 Jan. 2022. Accessed 7 Jan. 2022.

    “Technology Priorities CIOs Must Address in 2022.” Gartner, 19 Oct. 2021. Accessed 1 Nov. 2021.

    Thomson, Joel. Technology, Talent, and the Future Workplace: Canadian CIO Outlook 2021. The Conference Board of Canada, 7 Dec. 2021. Web.

    “Trend.” Lexico.com, Oxford University Press, 2021. Web.

    Vellante, Dave. “CIOs signal hybrid work will power tech spending through 2022.” SiliconANGLE, 25 Sept. 2021. Web.

    Whieldon, Esther, and Robert Clark. “ESG funds beat out S&P 500 in 1st year of COVID-19; how 1 fund shot to the top.” S&P Global Market Intelligence, April 2021. Accessed Dec. 2021.

    Security Priorities 2023

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}254|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $909 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 1 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Security Strategy & Budgeting
    • Parent Category Link: /security-strategy-and-budgeting
    • Most people still want a hybrid work model but there is a shortage in security workforce to maintain secure remote work, which impacts confidence in the security practice.
    • Pressure of operational excellence drives organizational modernization with the consequence of higher risks of security attacks that impact not only cyber but also physical systems.
    • The number of regulations with stricter requirements and reporting is increasing, along with high sanctions for violations.
    • Accurate assessment of readiness and benefits to adopt next-gen cybersecurity technologies can be difficult. Additionally, regulation often faces challenges to keep up with next-gen cybersecurity technologies implications and risks of adoption, which may not always be explicit.
    • Software is usually produced as part of a supply chain instead in a silo. Thus, a vulnerability in any part of the supply chain can become a threat surface.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Secure remote work still needs to be maintained to facilitate the hybrid work model post pandemic.
    • Despite all the cybersecurity risks, organizations continue modernization plans due to the long-term overall benefits. Hence, we need to secure organization modernization.
    • Organizations should use regulatory changes to improve security practices, instead of treating them as a compliance burden.
    • Next-gen cybersecurity technologies alone are not the silver bullet. A combination of technologies with skilled talent, useful data, and best practices will give a competitive advantage.

    Impact and Result

    • Use this report to help decide your 2023 security priorities by:
      • Collecting and analyzing your own related data, such as your organization 2022 incident reports. Use Info-Tech’s Security Priorities 2023 material for guidance.
      • Identifying your needs and analyzing your capabilities. Use Info-Tech's template to explain the priorities you need to your stakeholders.
      • Determining the next steps. Refer to Info-Tech's recommendations and related research.

    Security Priorities 2023 Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Security Priorities 2023 Report – A report to help decide your 2023 security priorities.

    Each organization is different, so a generic list of security priorities will not be applicable to every organization. Thus, you need to:

  • Collect and analyze your own related data such as your organization 2022 incident reports. Use Info-Tech’s Security Priorities 2023 material for guidance.
  • Identify your needs and analyze your capabilities. Use Info-Tech's template to explain the priorities you need to your stakeholders.
  • Refer to Info-Tech's recommendations and related research for guidance on the next steps.
    • Security Priorities 2023 Report

    Infographic

    Further reading

    Security Priorities 2023

    How we live post pandemic

    Each organization is different, so a generic list of priorities will not be applicable to every organization.

    During 2022, ransomware campaigns declined from quarter to quarter due to the collapse of experienced groups. Several smaller groups are developing to recapture the lost ransomware market. However, ransomware is still the most worrying cyber threat.

    Also in 2022, people returned to normal activities such as traveling and attending sports or music events but not yet to the office. The reasons behind this trend can be many fold, such as employees perceive that work from home (WFH) has positive productivity effects and time flexibility for employees, especially for those with families with younger children. On the other side of the spectrum, some employers perceive that WFH has negative productivity effects and thus are urging employees to return to the office. However, employers also understand the competition to retain skilled workers is harder. Thus, the trend is to have hybrid work where eligible employees can WFH for a certain portion of their work week.

    Besides ransomware and the hybrid work model, in 2022, we saw an evolving threat landscape, regulatory changes, and the potential for a recession by the end of 2023, which can impact how we prioritize cybersecurity this year. Furthermore, organizations are still facing the ongoing issues of insufficient cybersecurity resources and organization modernization.

    This report will explore important security trends, the security priorities that stem from these trends, and how to customize these priorities for your organization.

    In Q2 2022, the median ransom payment was $36,360 (-51% from Q1 2022), a continuation of a downward trend since Q4 2021 when the ransom payment median was $117,116.
    Source: Coveware, 2022

    From January until October 2022, hybrid work grew in almost all industries in Canada especially finance, insurance, real estate, rental and leasing (+14.7%), public administration and professional services (+11.8%), and scientific and technical services (+10.8%).
    Source: Statistics Canada, Labour Force Survey, October 2022; N=3,701

    Hybrid work changes processes and infrastructure

    Investment on remote work due to changes in processes and infrastructure

    As part of our research process for the 2023 Security Priorities Report, we used the results from our State of Hybrid Work in IT Survey, which collected responses between July 10 and July 29, 2022 (total N=745, with n=518 completed surveys). This survey details what changes in processes and IT infrastructure are likely due to hybrid work.

    Process changes to support hybrid work

    A bar graph is depicted with the following dataset: None of the above - 12%; Change management - 29%; Asset management - 34%; Service request support - 41%; Incident management - 42%

    Survey respondents (n=518) were asked what processes had the highest degree of change in response to supporting hybrid work. Incident management is the #1 result and service request support is #2. This is unsurprising considering that remote work changed how people communicate, how they access company assets, and how they connect to the company network and infrastructure.

    Infrastructure changes to support hybrid work

    A bar graph is depicted with the following dataset: Changed queue management and ticketing system(s) - 11%; Changed incident and service request processes - 23%; Addition of chatbots as part of the Service Desk intake process - 29%; Reduced the need for recovery office spaces and alternative work mitigations - 40%; Structure & day-to-day operation of Service Desk - 41%; Updated network architecture - 44%

    For 2023, we believe that hybrid work will remain. The first driver is that employees still prefer to work remotely for certain days of the week. The second driver is the investment from employers on enabling WFH during the pandemic, such as updated network architecture (44%) and the infrastructure and day-to-day operations (41%) as shown on our survey.

    Top cybersecurity concerns and organizational preparedness for them

    Concerns may correspond to readiness.

    In the Info-Tech Research Group 2023 Trends and Priorities Survey of IT professionals, we asked about cybersecurity concerns and the perception about readiness to meet current and future government legislation regarding cybersecurity requirements.

    Cybersecurity issues

    A bar graph is depicted with the following dataset: Cyber risks are not on the radar of the executive leaders or board of directors - 3.19; Organization is not prepared to respond to a cyber attack - 3.08; Supply chain risks related to cyber threats - 3.18; Talent shortages leading to capacity constraints in cyber security - 3.51; New government or industry-imposed regulations - 3.15

    Survey respondents were asked how concerned they are about certain cybersecurity issues from 1 (not concerned at all) to 5 (very concerned). The #1 concern was talent shortages. Other issues with similar concerns included cyber risks not on leadership's radar, supply chain risks, and new regulations (n=507).

    Cybersecurity legislation readiness

    A bar graph is depicted with the following dataset: 1 (Not confident at all) - 2.4%; 2 - 11.2%; 3 - 39.7%; 4 - 33.3%; 5 (Very confident) - 13.4%

    When asked about how confident organizations are about being prepared to meet current and future government legislation regarding cybersecurity requirements, from 1 (not confident at all) to 5 (very confident), the #1 response was 3 (n=499).

    Unsurprisingly, the ever-changing government legislation environment in a world emerging from a pandemic and ongoing wars may not give us the highest confidence.

    We know the concerns and readiness…

    But what is the overall security maturity?

    As part of our research process for the 2023 Security Priorities Report, we reviewed results of completed Info-Tech Research Group Security Governance and Management Benchmark diagnostics (N=912). This report details what we see in our clients' security governance maturity. Setting aside the perception on readiness – what are their actual security maturity levels?

    A bar graph is depicted with the following dataset: Security Culture - 47%; Policy and Process Governance - 47%; Event and Incident Management - 58%; Vulnerability - 57%; Auditing - 52%; Compliance Management - 58%; Risk Analysis - 52%

    Overall, assessed organizations are still scoring low (47%) on Security Culture and Policy and Process Governance. This justifies why most security incidents are still due to gaps in foundational security and security awareness, not lack of advanced controls such as event and incident management (58%).

    And how will the potential recession impact security?

    Organizations are preparing for recession, but opportunities for growth during recession should be well planned too.

    As part of our research process for the 2023 Security Priorities Report, we reviewed the results of the Info-Tech Research Group 2023 Trends and Priorities Survey of IT professionals, which collected responses between August 9 and September 9, 2022 (total N=813 with n=521 completed surveys).

    Expected organizational spending on cybersecurity compared to the previous fiscal year

    A bar graph is depicted with the following dataset: A decrease of more than 10% - 2.2%; A decrease of between 1-10% - 2.6%; About the same - 41.4%; An increase of between 1-10% - 39.6%; An increase of more than 10% - 14.3%

    Keeping the same spending is the #1 result and #2 is increasing spending up to 10%. This is a surprising finding considering the survey was conducted after the middle of 2022 and a recession has been predicted since early 2022 (n=489).

    An infographic titled Cloudy with a Chance of Recession

    Source: Statista, 2022, CC BY-ND

    US recession forecast

    Contingency planning for recessions normally includes tight budgeting; however, it can also include opportunities for growth such as hiring talent who have been laid off by competitors and are difficult to acquire in normal conditions. This can support our previous findings on increasing cybersecurity spending.

    Five Security Priorities for 2023

    This image describes the Five Security Priorities for 2023.

    Maintain Secure Hybrid Work

    PRIORITY 01

    • HOW TO STRATEGICALLY ACQUIRE, RETAIN, OR UPSKILL TALENT TO MAINTAIN SECURE SYSTEMS.

    Executive summary

    Background

    If anything can be learned from COVID-19 pandemic, it is that humans are resilient. We swiftly changed to remote workplaces and adjusted people, processes, and technologies accordingly. We had some hiccups along the way, but overall, we demonstrated that our ability to adjust is amazing.

    The pandemic changed how people work and how and where they choose to work, and most people still want a hybrid work model. However, the number of days for hybrid work itself varies. For example, from our survey in July 2022 (n=516), 55.8% of employees have the option of 2-3 days per week to work offsite, 21.0% for 1 day per week, and 17.8% for 4 days per week.

    Furthermore, the investment (e.g. on infrastructure and networks) to initiate remote work was huge, and the cost doesn't end there, as we need to maintain the secure remote work infrastructure to facilitate the hybrid work model.

    Current situation

    Remote work: A 2022 survey by WFH Research (N=16,451) reports that ~14% of full-time employees are fully remote and ~29% are in a hybrid arrangement as of Summer-Fall 2022.

    Security workforce shortage: A 2022 survey by Bridewell (N=521) reports that 68% of leaders say it has become harder to recruit the right people, impacting organizational ability to secure and monitor systems.

    Confidence in the security practice: A 2022 diagnostic survey by Info-Tech Research Group (N=55) reports that importance may not correspond to confidence; for example, the most important selected cybersecurity area, namely Data Access/Integrity (93.7%), surprisingly has the lowest confidence of the practice (80.5%).

    "WFH doubled every 15 years pre-pandemic. The increase in WFH during the pandemic was equal to 30 years of pre-pandemic growth."

    Source: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2021

    Leaders must do more to increase confidence in the security practice

    Importance may not correspond to confidence

    As part of our research process for the 2023 Security Priorities Report, we analyzed results from the Info-Tech Research Group diagnostics. This report details what we see in our clients' perceived importance of security and their confidence in existing security practices.

    Cybersecurity importance

    A bar graph is depicted with the following dataset: Importance to the Organization - 94.3%; Importance to My Department	92.2%

    Cybersecurity importance areas

    A bar graph is depicted with the following dataset: Mobility (Remote & Mobile Access) - 90.2%; Regulatory Compliance - 90.1%; Desktop Computing - 90.9%; Data Access / Integrity - 93.7%

    Confidence in cybersecurity practice

    A bar graph is depicted with the following dataset: Confidence in the Organization's Overall Security - 79.4%; Confidence in Security for My Department - 79.8%

    Confidence in cybersecurity practice areas

    A bar graph is depicted with the following dataset: Mobility (Remote & Mobile Access) - 75.8%; Regulatory Compliance - 81.5%; Desktop Computing - 80.9%; Data Access / Integrity - 80.5%

    Diagnostics respondents (N=55) were asked about how important security is to their organization or department. Importance to the overall organization is 2.1 percentage points (pp) higher, but confidence in the organization's overall security is slightly lower (-0.4 pp).

    If we break down to security areas, we can see that the most important area, Data Access/Integrity (93.7%), surprisingly has the lowest confidence of the practice: 80.5%. From this data we can conclude that leaders must build a strong cybersecurity workforce to increase confidence in the security practice.

    Use this template to explain the priorities you need your stakeholders to know about.

    Maintain secure hybrid work plan

    Provide a brief value statement for the initiative.

    Build a strong cybersecurity workforce to increase confidence in the security practice to facilitate hybrid work.

    Initiative Description:

    • Description must include what organization will undertake to complete the initiative.
    • Review your security strategy for hybrid work.
    • Identify skills gaps that hinder the successful execution of the hybrid work security strategy.
    • Use the identified skill gaps to define the technical skill requirements for current and future work roles.
    • Conduct a skills assessment on your current workforce to identify employee skill gaps.
    • Decide whether to train, hire, contract, or outsource each skill gap.

    Drivers:

    List initiative drivers.

    • Employees still prefer to WFH for certain days of the week.
    • The investment on WFH during pandemic such as updated network architecture and infrastructure and day-to-day operations.
    • Tech companies' huge layoffs, e.g. Meta laid off more than 11,000 employees.

    Risks:

    List initiative risks and impacts.

    • Unskilled workers lacking certificates or years of experience who are trained and become skilled workers then quit or are hijacked by competitors.
    • Organizational and cultural changes cause friction with work-life balance.
    • Increased attack surface of remote/hybrid workforce.

    Benefits:

    List initiative benefits and align to business benefits or benefits for the stakeholder groups that it impacts.

    • Increase perceived productivity by employees and increase retention.
    • Increase job satisfaction and work-life balance.
    • Hiring talent that has been laid off who are difficult to acquire in normal conditions.

    Related Info-Tech Research:

    Recommended Actions

    1. Identify skill requirements to maintain secure hybrid work

    Review your security strategy for hybrid work.

    Determine the skill needs of your security strategy.

    2. Identify skill gaps

    Identify skills gaps that hinder the successful execution of the hybrid work security strategy.

    Use the identified skill gaps to define the technical skill requirements for work roles.

    3. Decide whether to build or buy skills

    Conduct a skills assessment on your current workforce to identify employee skill gaps.

    Decide whether to train, hire, contract, or outsource each skill gap.

    Source: Close the InfoSec Skills Gap: Develop a Technical Skills Sourcing Plan, Info-Tech

    Secure Organization Modernization

    PRIORITY 02

    • TRENDS SUGGEST MODERNIZATION SUCH AS DIGITAL
      TRANSFORMATION TO THE CLOUD, OPERATIONAL TECHNOLOGY (OT),
      AND THE INTERNET OF THINGS (IOT) IS RISING; ADDRESSING THE RISK
      OF CONVERGING ENVIRONMENTS CAN NO LONGER BE DEFERRED.

    Executive summary

    From computerized milk-handling systems in Wisconsin farms, to automated railway systems in Europe, to Ausgrid's Distribution Network Management System (DNMS) in Australia, to smart cities and beyond; system modernization poses unique challenges to cybersecurity.

    The threats can be safety, such as the trains stopped in Denmark during the last weekend of October 2022 for several hours due to an attack on a third-party IT service provider; economics, such as a cream cheese production shutdown that occurred at the peak of cream cheese demand in October 2021 due to hackers compromising a large cheese manufacturer's plants and distribution centers; and reliability, such as the significant loss of communication for the Ukrainian military, which relied on Viasat's services.

    Despite all the cybersecurity risks, organizations continue modernization plans due to the long-term overall benefits.

    Current situation

    • Pressure of operational excellence: Competitive markets cannot keep pace with demand without modernization. For example, in automated milking systems, the labor time saved from milking can be used to focus on other essential tasks such as the decision-making process.
    • Technology offerings: Technologies are available and affordable such as automated equipment, versatile communication systems, high-performance human machine interaction (HMI), IIoT/Edge integration, and big data analytics.
    • Higher risks of cyberattacks: Modernization enlarges attack surfaces, which are not only cyber but also physical systems. Most incidents indicate that attackers gained access through the IT network, which was followed by infiltration into OT networks.

    IIoT market size is USD 323.62 billion in 2022 and projected to be around USD 1 trillion in 2028.

    Source: Statista,
    March 2022

    Modernization brings new opportunities and new threats

    Higher risks of cyberattacks on Industrial Control System (ICS)

    Target: Australian sewage plant.

    Method: Insider attack. Impact: 265,000 gallons of untreated sewage released.

    Target: Middle East energy companies.

    Method: Shamoon.

    Impact: Overwritten Windows-based systems files.

    Target: German Steel Mill

    Method: Spear-phishing

    Impact: Blast furnace control shutdown failure.

    Target: Middle East Safety Instrumented System (SIS).

    Method: TRISIS/TRITON.

    Impact: Modified safety system ladder logic.

    Target: Viasat's KA-SAT Network.

    Method: AcidRain.

    Impact: Significant loss of communication for the Ukrainian military, which relied on Viasat's services.

    A timeline displaying the years 1903; 2000; 2010; 2012; 2013; 2014; 2018; 2019; 2021; 2022 is displayed.

    Target: Marconi wireless telegraphs presentation. Method: Morse code.

    Impact: Fake message sent "Rats, rats, rats, rats. There was a young fellow of Italy, Who diddled the public quite prettily."

    Target: Iranian uranium enrichment plant.

    Method: Stuxnet.

    Impact: Compromised programmable logic controllers (PLCs).

    Target: ICS supply chain.

    Method: Havex.

    Impact: Remote Access Trojan (RAT) collected information and uploaded data to command-and-control (C&C) servers.

    Target: Ukraine power grid.

    Method: BlackEnergy.

    Impact: Manipulation of HMI View causing 1-6 hour power outages for 230,000 consumers.

    Target: Colonial Pipeline.

    Method: DarkSide ransomware.

    Impact: Compromised billing infrastructure halted the pipeline operation.

    Sources:

    • DOE, 2018
    • CSIS, 2022
    • MIT Technology Review, 2022

    Info-Tech Insight

    Most OT incidents start with attacks against IT networks and then move laterally into the OT environment. Therefore, converging IT and OT security will help protect the entire organization.

    Use this template to explain the priorities you need your stakeholders to know about.

    Secure organization modernization

    Provide a brief value statement for the initiative.

    The systems (OT, IT, IIoT) are evolving now – ensure your security plan has you covered.

    Initiative Description:

    • Description must include what organization will undertake to complete the initiative.
    • Identify the drivers to align with your organization's business objectives.
    • Build your case by leveraging a cost-benefit analysis and update your security strategy.
    • Identify people, process, and technology gaps that hinder the modernization security strategy.
    • Use the identified skill gaps to update risks, policies and procedures, IR, DR, and BCP.
    • Evaluate and enable modernization technology top focus areas and refine security processes.
    • Decide whether to train, hire, contract, or outsource to fill the security workforce gap.

    Drivers:

    List initiative drivers.

    • Pressure of operational excellence
    • Technology offerings
    • Higher risks of cyberattacks

    Risks:

    List initiative risks and impacts.

    • Complex systems with many components to implement and manage require diligent change management.
    • Organizational and cultural changes cause friction between humans and machines.
    • Increased attack surface of cyber and physical systems.

    Benefits:

    List initiative benefits and align to business benefits or benefits for the stakeholder groups that it impacts.

    • Improve service reliability through continuous and real-time operation.
    • Enhance efficiency through operations visibility and transparency.
    • Gain cost savings and efficiency to automate operations of complex and large equipment and instrumentations.

    Related Info-Tech Research:

    Recommended Actions

    1. Identify modernization business cases to secure

    Identify the drivers to align with your organization's business objectives.

    Build your case by leveraging a cost-benefit analysis, and update your security strategy.

    2. Identify gaps

    Identify people, process, and technology gaps that hinder the modernization
    security strategy.

    Use the identified skill gaps to update risks, policies and procedures, IR, DR, and BCP.

    3. Decide whether to build or buy capabilities

    Evaluate and enable modernization technology top focus areas and refine
    security processes.

    Decide whether to train, hire, contract, or outsource to fill the security workforce gap.

    Sources:

    Industrial Control System (ICS) Modernization: Unlock the Value of Automation in Utilities, Info-Tech

    Secure IT-OT Convergence, Info-Tech

    Develop a cost-benefit analysis

    Identify a modernization business case for security.

    Benefits

    Metrics

    Operational Efficiency and Cost Savings

    • Reduction in truck rolls and staff time of manual operations of equipment or instrumentation.
    • Cost reduction in energy usage such as substation power voltage level or water treatment chemical level.

    Improve Reliability and Resilience

    • Reduction in field crew time to identify the outage locations by remotely accessing field equipment to narrow down the
      fault areas.
    • Reduction in outage time impacting customers and avoiding financial penalty in service quality metrics.
    • Improve operating reliability through continuous and real-time trend analysis of equipment performance.

    Energy & Capacity Savings

    • Optimize energy usage of operation to reduce overall operating cost and contribution to organizational net-zero targets.

    Customers & Society Benefits

    • Improve customer safety for essential services such as drinkable water consumption.
    • Improve reliability of services and address service equity issues based on data.

    Cost

    Metrics

    Equipment and Infrastructure

    Upgrade existing security equipment or instrumentation or deploy new, e.g. IPS on Enterprise DMZ and Operations DMZ.

    Implement communication network equipment and labor to install and configure.

    Upgrade or construct server room including cooling/heating, power backup, and server and rack hardware.

    Software and Commission

    The SCADA/HMI software and maintenance fee as well as lifecycle upgrade implementation project cost.

    Labor cost of field commissioning and troubleshooting.

    Integration with security systems, e.g. log management and continuous monitoring.

    Support and Resources

    Cost to hire/outsource security FTEs for ongoing managing and operating security devices, e.g. SOC.

    Cost to hire/outsource IT/OT FTEs to support and troubleshoot systems and its integrations with security systems, e.g. MSSP.

    An example of a cost-benefit analysis for ICS modernization

    Sources:

    Industrial Control System (ICS) Modernization: Unlock the Value of Automation in Utilities, Info-Tech

    Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 2021

    IT-OT convergence demands new security approach and solutions

    Identify gaps

    Attack Vectors

    IT

    • User's compromised credentials
    • User's access device, e.g. laptop, smartphone
    • Access method, e.g. denial-of-service to modem, session hijacking, bad data injection

    OT

    • Site operations, e.g. SCADA server, engineering workstation, historian
    • Controls, e.g. SCADA Client, HMI, PLCs, RTUs
    • Process devices, e.g. sensors, actuators, field devices

    Defense Strategies

    • Limit exposure of system information
    • Identify and secure remote access points
    • Restrict tools and scripts
    • Conduct regular security audits
    • Implement a dynamic network environment

    (Control System Defense: Know the Opponent, CISA)

    An example of a high-level architecture of an electric utility's control system and its interaction with IT systems.

    An example of a high-level architecture of an electric utility's control system and its interaction with IT systems.

    Source: ISA-99, 2007

    RESPOND TO REGULATORY CHANGES

    PRIORITY 03

    • GOVERNMENT-ENACTED POLICY CHANGES AND INDUSTRY REGULATORY CHANGES COULD BE A COMPLIANCE BURDEN … OR PREVENT YOUR NEXT SECURITY INCIDENT.

    Executive summary

    Background

    Government-enacted regulatory changes are occurring at an ever-increasing rate these days. As one example, on November 10, 2022, the EU Parliament introduced two EU cybersecurity laws: the Network and Information Security (NIS2) Directive (applicable to organizations located within the EU and organizations outside the EU that are essential within an EU country) and the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA). There are also industry regulatory changes such as PCI DSS v4.0 for the payment sector and the North American Electric Reliability Corporation Critical Infrastructure Protection (NERC CIP) for Bulk Electric Systems (BES).

    Organizations should use regulatory changes as a means to improve security practices, instead of treating them as a compliance burden. As said by lead member of EU Parliament Bart Groothuis on NIS2, "This European directive is going to help around 160,000 entities tighten their grip on security […] It will also enable information sharing with the private sector and partners around the world. If we are being attacked on an industrial scale, we need to respond on an industrial scale."

    Current situation

    Stricter requirements and reporting: Regulations such as NIS2 include provisions for incident response, supply chain security, and encryption and vulnerability disclosure and set tighter cybersecurity obligations for risk management reporting obligations.

    Broader sectors: For example, the original NIS directive covers 19 sectors such as Healthcare, Digital Infrastructure, Transport, and Energy. Meanwhile, the new NIS2 directive increases to 35 sectors by adding other sectors such as providers of public electronic communications networks or services, manufacturing of certain critical products (e.g. pharmaceuticals), food, and digital services.

    High sanctions for violations: For example, Digital Services Act (DSA) includes fines of up to 6% of global turnover and a ban on operating in the EU single market in case of repeated serious breaches.

    Approximately 100 cross-border data flow regulations exist in 2022.

    Source: McKinsey, 2022

    Stricter requirements for payments

    Obligation changes to keep up with emerging threats and technologies

    64 New requirements were added
    A total of 64 requirements have been added to version 4.0 of the PCI DSS.

    13 New requirements become effective March 31, 2024
    The other 51 new requirements are considered best practice until March 31, 2025, at which point they will become effective.

    11 New requirements only for service providers
    11 of the new requirements are applicable only to entities that provide third-party services to merchants.

    Defined roles must be assigned for requirements.

    Focus on periodically assessing and documenting scope.

    Entities may choose a defined approach or a customized approach to requirements.

    An example of new requirements for PCI DSS v4.0

    Source: Prepare for PCI DSS v4.0, Info-Tech

    Use this template to explain the priorities you need your stakeholders to know about.

    Respond to regulatory changes

    Provide a brief value statement for the initiative.

    The compliance obligations are evolving – ensure your security plan has you covered.

    Initiative Description:

    Description must include what organization will undertake to complete the initiative.

    • Identify relevant security and privacy compliance and conformance levels.
    • Identify gaps for updated obligations, and map obligations into control framework.
    • Review, update, and implement policies and strategy.
    • Develop compliance exception process and forms.
    • Develop test scripts.
    • Track status and exceptions

    Drivers:

    List initiative drivers.

    • Pressure of new regulations
    • Governance, risk & compliance (GRC) tool offerings
    • High administrative or criminal penalties of non-compliance

    Risks:

    List initiative risks and impacts.

    • Complex structures and a great number of compliance requirements
    • Restricted budget and lack of skilled workforce for organizations such as local municipalities and small or medium organizations compared to private counterparts
    • Personal liability for some regulations for non-compliance

    Benefits:

    List initiative benefits and align to business benefits or benefits for the stakeholder groups that it impacts.

    • Reduces compliance risk.
    • Reduces complexity within the control environment by using a single framework to align multiple compliance regimes.
    • Reduces costs and efforts related to managing IT audits through planning and preparation.

    Related Info-Tech Research:

    Recommended Actions

    1. Identify compliance obligations

    Identify relevant security and privacy obligations and conformance levels.

    Identify gaps for updated obligations, and map obligations into control framework.

    2. Implement compliance strategy

    Review, update, and implement policies and strategy.

    Develop compliance exception process.

    3. Track and report

    Develop test scripts to check your remediations to ensure they are effective.

    Track and report status and exceptions.

    Sources: Build a Security Compliance Program and Prepare for PCI DSS v4.0, Info-Tech

    Identify relevant security and privacy compliance obligations

    Identify obligations

    # Security Jurisdiction
    1 Network and Information Security (NIS2) Directive European Union (EU) and organizations outside the EU that are essential within an EU country
    2 North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) Critical Infrastructure Protection (CIP) North American electrical utilities
    3 Executive Order (EO) 14028: Improving the Nation's Cybersecurity, The White House, 2021 United States

    #

    Privacy Jurisdiction
    1 General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) EU and EU citizens
    2 Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) Canada
    3 California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) California, USA
    4 Personal Information Protection Law of the People’s Republic of China (PIPL) China

    An example of security and privacy compliance obligations

    How much does it cost to become compliant?

    • It is important to understand the various frameworks and to adhere to the appropriate compliance obligations.
    • Many factors influence the cost of compliance, such as the size of organization, the size of network, and current security readiness.
    • To manage compliance obligations, it is important to use a platform that not only performs internal and external monitoring but also provides third-party vendors (if applicable) with visibility into potential threats in their organization.

    Adopt Next-Generation Cybersecurity Technologies

    PRIORITY 04

    • GOVERNMENTS AND HACKERS ARE RECOGNIZING THE IMPORTANCE OF EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, SUCH AS ZERO TRUST ARCHITECTURE AND AI-BASED CYBERSECURITY. SO SHOULD YOUR ORGANIZATION.

    Executive summary

    Background

    The cat and mouse game between threat actors and defenders is continuing. The looming question "can defenders do better?" has been answered with rapid development of technology. This includes the automation of threat analysis (signature-based, specification-based, anomaly-based, flow-based, content-based, sandboxing) not only on IT but also on other relevant environments, e.g. IoT, IIoT, and OT based on AI/ML.

    More fundamental approaches such as post-quantum cryptography and zero trust (ZT) are also emerging.
    ZT is a principle, a model, and also an architecture focused on resource protection by always verifying transactions using the least privilege principle. Hopefully in 2023, ZT will be more practical and not just a vendor marketing buzzword.

    Next-gen cybersecurity technologies alone are not a silver bullet. A combination of skilled talent, useful data, and best practices will give a competitive advantage. The key concepts are explainable, transparent, and trustworthy. Furthermore, regulation often faces challenges to keep up with next-gen cybersecurity technologies, especially with the implications and risks of adoption, which may not always be explicit.

    Current situation

    ZT: Performing an accurate assessment of readiness and benefits to adopt ZT can be difficult due to ZT's many components. Thus, an organization needs to develop a ZT roadmap that aligns with organizational goals and focuses on access to data, assets, applications, and services; don't select solutions or vendors too early.

    Post-quantum cryptography: Current cryptographic applications, such as RSA for PKI, rely on factorization. However, algorithms such as Shor's show quantum speedup for factorization, which can break current crypto when sufficient quantum computing devices are available. Thus, threat actors can intercept current encrypted information and store it to decrypt in the future.

    AI-based threat management: AI helps in analyzing and correlating data extremely fast compared to humans. Millions of telemetries, malware samples, raw events, and vulnerability data feed into the AI system, which humans cannot process manually. Furthermore, AI does not get tired in processing this big data, thus avoiding human error and negligence.

    Data breach mitigation cost without AI: USD 6.20 million; and with AI: USD 3.15 million

    Source: IBM, 2022

    Traditional security is not working

    Alert Fatigue

    Too many false alarms and too many events to process. Evolving threat landscapes waste your analysts' valuable time on mundane tasks, such as evidence collection. Meanwhile, only limited time is spared for decisions and conclusions, which results in the fear of missing an incident and alert fatigue.

    Lack of Insight

    To report progress, clear metrics are needed. However, cybersecurity still lacks in this area as the system itself is complex and some systems work in silos. Furthermore, lessons learned are not yet distilled into insights for improving future accuracy.

    Lack of Visibility

    System integration is required to create consistent workflows across the organization and to ensure complete visibility of the threat landscape, risks, and assets. Also, the convergence of OT, IoT, and IT enhances this challenge.

    Source: IBM Security Intelligence, 2020

    A business case for AI-based cybersecurity

    Threat management

    Prevention

    Risk scores are generated by machine learning based on variables such as behavioral patterns and geolocation. Zero trust architecture is combined with machine learning. Asset management leverages visibility using machine learning. Comply with regulations by improving discovery, classification, and protection of data using machine learning. Data security and data privacy services use machine learning for data discovery.

    Detection

    AI, advanced machine learning, and static approaches, such as code file analysis, combine to automatically detect and analyze threats and prevent threats from spreading, assisted by threat intelligence.

    Response

    AI helps in orchestrating security technologies for organizations to reduce the number of security agents installed, which may not talk to each other or, worse, may conflict with each other.

    Recovery

    AI continuously tunes based on lessons learned, such as creating security policies for improving future accuracy. AI also does not get fatigue, and it assists humans in a faster recovery.

    Prevention; Detection; Response; Recovery

    AI has been around since the 1940s, but why is it only gaining traction now? Because supporting technologies are only now available, including faster GPUs for complex computations and cheaper storage for massive volumes of data.

    Use this template to explain the priorities you need your stakeholders to know about.

    Adopt next-gen cybersecurity technologies

    Use this template to explain the priorities you need your stakeholders to know about.

    Develop a practical roadmap that shows the business value of next-gen cybersecurity technologies investment.

    Initiative Description:

    Description must include what organization will undertake to complete the initiative.

    • Identify the stakeholders who will be affected by the next-gen cybersecurity technologies implementation and define responsibilities based on skillsets and the degree of support.
    • Adopt well-established data governance practices for cross-functional teams.
    • Conduct a maturity assessment of key processes and highlight interdependencies.
    • Develop a baseline and periodically review risks, policies and procedures, and business plan.
    • Develop a roadmap and deploy next-gen cybersecurity architecture and controls step by step, working with trusted technology partners.
    • Monitor metrics on effectiveness and efficiency.

    Drivers:

    List initiative drivers.

    • Pressure of attacks by sophisticated threat actors
    • Next-gen cybersecurity technologies tool offerings
    • High cost of traditional security, e.g. longer breach lifecycle

    Risks:

    List initiative risks and impacts.

    • Lack of transparency of the model or bias, leading to non-compliance with policies/regulations
    • Risks related with data quality and inadequate data for model training
    • Adversarial attacks, including, but not limited to, adversarial input and model extraction

    Benefits:

    List initiative benefits and align to business benefits or benefits for the stakeholder groups that it impacts.

    • Reduces the number of alerts, thus reduces alert fatigue.
    • Increases the identification of unknown threats.
    • Leads to faster detection and response.
    • Closes skills gap and increases productivity.

    Related Info-Tech Research:

    Recommended Actions

    1. People

    Identify the stakeholders who will be affected by the next-gen cybersecurity technologies implementation and define responsibilities based on skillsets and the degree of support.

    Adopt well-established data governance practices for cross-functional teams.

    2. Process

    Conduct a maturity assessment of key processes and highlight interdependencies.

    Develop a baseline and periodically review risks, policies and procedures, and business plan.

    3. Technology

    Develop a roadmap and deploy next-gen cybersecurity architecture and controls step by step, working with trusted technology partners.

    Monitor metrics on effectiveness and efficiency.

    Source: Leverage AI in Threat Management (keynote presentation), Info-Tech

    Secure Services and Applications

    PRIORITY 05

    • APIS ARE STILL THE #1 THREAT TO APPLICATION SECURITY.

    Executive summary

    Background

    Software is usually produced as part of a supply chain instead of in silos. A vulnerability in any part of the supply chain can become a threat surface. We have learned this from recent incidents such as Log4j, SolarWinds, and Kaseya where attackers compromised a Virtual System Administrator tool used by managed service providers to attack around 1,500 organizations.

    DevSecOps is a culture and philosophy that unifies development, security, and operations to answer this challenge. DevSecOps shifts security left by automating, as much as possible, development and testing. DevSecOps provides many benefits such as rapid development of secure software and assurance that, prior to formal release and delivery, tests are reliably performed and passed.

    DevSecOps practices can apply to IT, OT, IoT, and other technology environments, for example, by integrating a Secure Software Development Framework (SSDF).

    Current situation

    Secure Software Supply Chain: Logging is a fundamental feature of most software, and recently the use of software components, especially open source, are based on trust. From the Log4j incident we learned that more could be done to improve the supply chain by adopting ZT to identify related components and data flows between systems and to apply the least privilege principle.

    DevSecOps: A software error wiped out wireless services for thousands of Rogers customers across Canada in 2021. Emergency services were also impacted, even though outgoing 911 calls were always accessible. Losing such services could have been avoided, if tests were reliably performed and passed prior to release.

    OT insecure-by-design: In OT, insecurity-by-design is still a norm, which causes many vulnerabilities such as insecure protocols implementation, weak authentication schemes, or insecure firmware updates. Additional challenges are the lack of CVEs or CVE duplication, the lack of Software Bill of Materials (SBOM), and product supply chains issues such as vulnerable products that are certified because of the scoping limitation and emphasis on functional testing.

    Technical causes of cybersecurity incidents in EU critical service providers in 2019-2021 shows: software bug (12%) and faulty software changes/update (9%).

    Source: CIRAS Incident reporting, ENISA (N=1,239)

    Software development keeps evolving

    DOD Maturation of Software Development Best Practices

    Best Practices 30 Years Ago 15 Years Ago Present Day
    Lifecycle Years or Months Months or Weeks Weeks or Days
    Development Process Waterfall Agile DevSecOps
    Architecture Monolithic N-Tier Microservices
    Deployment & Packaging Physical Virtual Container
    Hosting Infrastructure Server Data Center Cloud
    Cybersecurity Posture Firewall + SIEM + Zero Trust

    Best practices in software development are evolving as shown on the diagram to the left. For example, 30 years ago the lifecycle was "Years or Months," while in the present day it is "Weeks or Days."

    These changes also impact security such as the software architecture, which is no longer "Monolithic" but "Microservices" normally built within the supply chain.

    The software supply chain has known integrity attacks that can happen on each part of it. Starting from bad code submitted by a developer, to compromised source control platform (e.g. PHP git server compromised), to compromised build platform (e.g. malicious behavior injected on SolarWinds build), to a compromised package repository where users are deceived into using the bad package by the similarity between the malicious and the original package name.

    Therefore, we must secure each part of the link to avoid attacks on the weakest link.

    Software supply chain guidance

    Secure each part of the link to avoid attacks on the weakest link.

    Guide for Developers

    Guide for Suppliers

    Guide for Customers

    Secure product criteria and management, develop secure code, verify third-party components, harden build environment, and deliver code.

    Define criteria for software security checks, protect software, produce well-secured software, and respond to vulnerabilities.

    Secure procurement and acquisition, secure deployment, and secure software operations.

    Source: "Securing the Software Supply Chain" series, Enduring Security Framework (ESF), 2022

    "Most software today relies on one or more third-party components, yet organizations often have little or no visibility into and understanding of how these software components are developed, integrated, and deployed, as well as the practices used to ensure the components' security."

    Source: NIST – NCCoE, 2022

    Use this template to explain the priorities you need your stakeholders to know about.

    Secure services and applications

    Provide a brief value statement for the initiative.

    Adopt recommended practices for securing the software supply chain.

    Initiative Description:

    Description must include what organization will undertake to complete the initiative.

    • Define and keep security requirements and risk assessments up to date.
    • Require visibility into provenance of product, and require suppliers' self-attestation of security hygiene.
    • Verify distribution infrastructure, product and individual components integrity, and SBOM.
    • Use multi-layered defenses, e.g. ZT for integration and control configuration.
    • Train users on how to detect and report anomalies and when to apply updates to a system.
    • Ensure updates from authorized and authenticated sources and verify the integrity of the updated SBOM.

    Drivers:

    List initiative drivers.

    • Cyberattacks exploit the vulnerabilities of weak software supply chain
    • Increased need to enhance software supply chain security, e.g. under the White House Executive Order (EO) 14028
    • OT insecure-by-design hinders OT modernization

    Risks:

    List initiative risks and impacts.

    Only a few developers and suppliers explicitly address software security in detail.

    Time pressure to deliver functionality over security.

    Lack of security awareness and lack of trained workforce.

    Benefits:

    List initiative benefits and align to business benefits or benefits for the stakeholder groups that it impacts.

    Customers (acquiring organizations) achieve secure acquisition, deployment, and operation of software.

    Developers and suppliers provide software security with minimal vulnerabilities in its releases.

    Automated processes such as automated testing avoid error-prone and labor-intensive manual test cases.

    Related Info-Tech Research:

    Recommended Actions

    1. Procurement and Acquisition

    Define and keep security requirements and risk assessments up to date.

    Perform analysis on current market and supplier solutions and acquire security evaluation.

    Require visibility into provenance of product, and require suppliers' self-attestation of security hygiene

    2. Deployment

    Verify distribution infrastructure, product and individual components integrity, and SBOM.

    Save and store the tests and test environment and review and verify the
    self-attestation mechanism.

    Use multi-layered defenses, e.g. ZT for integration and control configuration.

    3. Software Operations

    Train users on how to detect and report anomalies and when to apply updates to a system.

    Ensure updates from authorized and authenticated sources and verify the integrity of the updated SBOM.

    Apply supply chain risk management (SCRM) operations.

    Source: "Securing the Software Supply Chain" series, Enduring Security Framework (ESF), 2022

    Bibliography

    Aksoy, Cevat Giray, Jose Maria Barrero, Nicholas Bloom, Steven J. Davis, Mathias Dolls, and Pablo Zarate. "Working from Home Around the World." Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2022.
    Barrero, Jose Maria, Nicholas Bloom, and Steven J. Davis. "Why working from home will stick." WFH Research, National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 28731, 2021.
    Boehm, Jim, Dennis Dias, Charlie Lewis, Kathleen Li, and Daniel Wallance. "Cybersecurity trends: Looking over the horizon." McKinsey & Company, March 2022. Accessed
    31 Oct. 2022.
    "China: TC260 issues list of national standards supporting implementation of PIPL." OneTrust, 8 Nov. 2022. Accessed 17 Nov. 2022.
    Chmielewski, Stéphane. "What is the potential of artificial intelligence to improve cybersecurity posture?" before.ai blog, 7 Aug. 2022. Accessed 15 Aug. 2022.
    Conerly, Bill. "The Recession Will Begin Late 2023 Or Early 2024." Forbes, 1 Nov. 2022. Accessed 8 Nov. 2022.
    "Control System Defense: Know the Opponent." CISA, 22 Sep. 2022. Accessed 17 Nov. 2022.
    "Cost of a Data Breach Report 2022." IBM, 2022.
    "Cybersecurity: Parliament adopts new law to strengthen EU-wide resilience." European Parliament News, 10 Nov. 2022. Press Release.
    "Cyber Security in Critical National Infrastructure Organisations: 2022." Bridewell, 2022. Accessed 7 Nov. 2022.
    Davis, Steven. "The Big Shift to Working from Home." NBER Macro Annual Session On
    "The Future of Work," 1 April 2022.
    "Digital Services Act: EU's landmark rules for online platforms enter into force."
    EU Commission, 16 Nov. 2022. Accessed 16 Nov. 2022.
    "DoD Enterprise DevSecOps Fundamentals." DoD CIO, 12 May 2022. Accessed 21 Nov. 2022.
    Elkin, Elizabeth, and Deena Shanker. "That Cream Cheese Shortage You Heard About? Cyberattacks Played a Part." Bloomberg, 09 Dec. 2021. Accessed 27 Oct. 2022.
    Evan, Pete. "What happened at Rogers? Day-long outage is over, but questions remain." CBC News, 21 April 2022. Accessed 15 Nov. 2022.
    "Fewer Ransomware Victims Pay, as Median Ransom Falls in Q2 2022." Coveware,
    28 July 2022. Accessed 18 Nov. 2022.
    "Fighting cybercrime: new EU cybersecurity laws explained." EU Commission, 10 Nov. 2022. Accessed 16 Nov. 2022.
    "Guide to PCI compliance cost." Vanta. Accessed 18 Nov. 2022.
    Hammond, Susannah, and Mike Cowan. "Cost of Compliance 2022: Competing priorities." Thomson Reuters, 2022. Accessed 18 Nov. 2022.
    Hemsley, Kevin, and Ronald Fisher. "History of Industrial Control System Cyber Incidents." Department of Energy (DOE), 2018. Accessed 29 Aug. 2022.
    Hofmann, Sarah. "What Is The NIS2 And How Will It Impact Your Organisation?" CyberPilot,
    5 Aug. 2022. Accessed 16 Nov. 2022.
    "Incident reporting." CIRAS Incident Reporting, ENISA. Accessed 21 Nov. 2022.
    "Introducing SLSA, an End-to-End Framework for Supply Chain Integrity." Google,
    16 June 2021. Accessed 25 Nov. 2022.
    Kovacs, Eduard. "Trains Vulnerable to Hacker Attacks: Researchers." SecurityWeek, 29 Dec. 2015. Accessed 15 Nov. 2022.
    "Labour Force Survey, October 2022." Statistics Canada, 4 Nov. 2022. Accessed 7 Nov. 2022.
    Malacco, Victor. "Promises and potential of automated milking systems." Michigan State University Extension, 28 Feb. 2022. Accessed 15 Nov. 2022.
    Maxim, Merritt, et al. "Planning Guide 2023: Security & Risk." Forrester, 23 Aug. 2022. Accessed 31 Oct. 2022.
    "National Cyber Threat Assessment 2023-2024." Canadian Centre for Cyber Security, 2022. Accessed 18 Nov. 2022.
    Nicaise, Vincent. "EU NIS2 Directive: what's changing?" Stormshield, 20 Oct. 2022. Accessed
    17 Nov. 2022.
    O'Neill, Patrick. "Russia hacked an American satellite company one hour before the Ukraine invasion." MIT Technology Review, 10 May 2022. Accessed 26 Aug. 2022.
    "OT ICEFALL: The legacy of 'insecure by design' and its implications for certifications and risk management." Forescout, 2022. Accessed 21 Nov. 2022.
    Palmer, Danny. "Your cybersecurity staff are burned out - and many have thought about quitting." ZDNet, 8 Aug. 2022. Accessed 19 Aug. 2022.
    Placek, Martin. "Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) market size worldwide from 2020 to 2028 (in billion U.S. dollars)." Statista, 14 March 2022. Accessed 15 Nov. 2022.
    "Revised Proposal Attachment 5.13.N.1 ADMS Business Case PUBLIC." Ausgrid, Jan. 2019. Accessed 15 Nov. 2022.
    Richter, Felix. "Cloudy With a Chance of Recession." Statista, 6 April 2022. Web.
    "Securing the Software Supply Chain: Recommended Practices Guide for Developers." Enduring Security Framework (ESF), Aug. 2022. Accessed 22 Sep. 2022.
    "Securing the Software Supply Chain: Recommended Practices Guide for Suppliers." Enduring Security Framework (ESF), Sep. 2022. Accessed 21 Nov. 2022.
    "Securing the Software Supply Chain: Recommended Practices Guide for Customers." Enduring Security Framework (ESF), Oct. 2022. Accessed 21 Nov. 2022.
    "Security Guidelines for the Electricity Sector: Control System Electronic Connectivity."
    North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC), 28 Oct. 2013. Accessed 25 Nov. 2022.
    Shepel, Jan. "Schreiber Foods hit with cyberattack; plants closed." Wisconsin State Farmer,
    26 Oct. 2022. Accessed 15 Nov. 2022.
    "Significant Cyber Incidents." Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). Accessed
    1 Sep. 2022.
    Souppaya, Murugiah, Michael Ogata, Paul Watrobski, and Karen Scarfone. "Software Supply Chain and DevOps Security Practices: Implementing a Risk-Based Approach to DevSecOps." NIST - National Cybersecurity Center of Excellence (NCCoE), Nov. 2022. Accessed
    22 Nov. 2022.
    "Ten Things Will Change Cybersecurity in 2023." SOCRadar, 23 Sep. 2022. Accessed
    31 Oct. 2022.
    "The Nature of Cybersecurity Defense: Pentagon To Reveal Updated Zero-Trust Cybersecurity Strategy & Guidelines." Cybersecurity Insiders. Accessed 21 Nov. 2022.
    What Is Threat Management? Common Challenges and Best Practices." IBM Security Intelligence, 2020.
    Woolf, Tim, et al. "Benefit-Cost Analysis for Utility-Facing Grid Modernization Investments: Trends, Challenges, and Considerations." Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Feb. 2021. Accessed 15 Nov. 2022.
    Violino, Bob. "5 key considerations for your 2023 cybersecurity budget planning." CSO Online,
    14 July 2022. Accessed 27 Oct. 2022

    Research Contributors and Experts

    Andrew Reese
    Cybersecurity Practice Lead
    Zones

    Ashok Rutthan
    Chief Information Security Officer (CISO)
    Massmart

    Chris Weedall
    Chief Information Security Officer (CISO)
    Cheshire East Council

    Jeff Kramer
    EVP Digital Transformation and Cybersecurity
    Aprio

    Kris Arthur
    Chief Information Security Officer (CISO)
    SEKO Logistics

    Mike Toland
    Chief Information Security Officer (CISO)
    Mutual Benefit Group

    Develop APIs That Work Properly for the Organization

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}525|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 10.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $1,133,999 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 23 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Requirements & Design
    • Parent Category Link: /requirements-and-design
    • CIOs have trouble integrating new technologies (e.g. mobile, cloud solutions) with legacy applications, and lack standards for using APIs across the organization.
    • Organizations produce APIs that are error-prone, not consistently configured, and not maintained effectively.
    • Organizations are looking for ways to increase application quality and code reusability to improve development throughput using web APIs.
    • Organizations are looking for opportunities to create an application ecosystem which can expose internal services across the organization and/or to external third parties and business partners.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Organizations are looking to go beyond current development practices to provide scalable and reusable web services.
    • Web API development is a tactical competency that is important to enabling speed of development, quality of applications, reusability, innovation, and business alignment.
    • Design your web API as a product that promotes speed of development and service reuse.
    • Optimize the design, development, testing, and monitoring of your APIs incrementally and iteratively to cover all use cases in the long term.

    Impact and Result

    • Create a repeatable process to improve the quality, reusability, and governance of your web APIs.
    • Define the purpose of your API and the common uses cases that it will service.
    • Understand what development techniques are required to develop an effective web API based on Info-Tech’s web API framework.
    • Continuously reiterate your web API to demonstrate to business stakeholders the value your web API provides.

    Develop APIs That Work Properly for the Organization Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should develop APIs, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Examine the opportunities web APIs can enable

    Assess the opportunities of web APIs.

    • Develop APIs That Work Properly for the Organization – Phase 1: Examine the Opportunities Web APIs Can Enable

    2. Design and develop a web API

    Design and develop web APIs that support business processes and enable reusability.

    • Develop APIs That Work Properly for the Organization – Phase 2: Design and Develop a Web API
    • Web APIs High-Level Design Requirements Template
    • Web API Design Document Template

    3. Test the web API

    Accommodate web API testing best practices in application test plans.

    • Develop APIs That Work Properly for the Organization – Phase 3: Test the Web API
    • Web API Test Plan Template

    4. Monitor and continuously optimize the web API

    Monitor the usage and value of web APIs and plan for future optimizations and maintenance.

    • Develop APIs That Work Properly for the Organization – Phase 4: Monitor and Continuously Optimize the Web API
    • Web API Process Governance Template
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Develop APIs That Work Properly for the Organization

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Examine the Opportunities Web APIs Can Enable

    The Purpose

    Gauge the importance of web APIs for achieving your organizational needs.

    Understand how web APIs can be used to achieve below-the-line and above-the-line benefits.

    Be aware of web API development pitfalls. 

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Understanding the revenue generation and process optimization opportunities web APIs can bring to your organization.

    Knowledge of the current web API landscape. 

    Activities

    1.1 Examine the opportunities web APIs can enable.

    Outputs

    2 Design & Develop Your Web API

    The Purpose

    Establish a web API design and development process.

    Design scalable web APIs around defined business process flows and rules.

    Define the web service objects that the web APIs will expose. 

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Reusable web API designs.

    Identification of data sets that will be available through web services.

    Implement web API development best practices. 

    Activities

    2.1 Define high-level design details based on web API requirements.

    2.2 Define your process workflows and business rules.

    2.3 Map the relationships among data tables through ERDs.

    2.4 Define your data model by mapping the relationships among data tables through data flow diagrams.

    2.5 Define your web service objects by effectively referencing your data model.

    Outputs

    High-level web API design.

    Business process flow.

    Entity relationship diagrams.

    Data flow diagrams.

    Identification of web service objects.

    3 Test Your Web API

    The Purpose

    Incorporate APIs into your existing testing practices.

    Emphasize security testing with web APIs.

    Learn of the web API testing and monitoring tool landscape.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Creation of a web API test plan.

    Activities

    3.1 Create a test plan for your web API.

    Outputs

    Web API Test Plan.

    4 Monitor and Continuously Optimize Your Web API

    The Purpose

    Plan for iterative development and maintenance of web APIs.

    Manage web APIs for versioning and reuse.

    Establish a governance structure to manage changes to web APIs. 

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Implement web API monitoring and maintenance best practices.

    Establishment of a process to manage future development and maintenance of web APIs. 

    Activities

    4.1 Identify roles for your API development projects.

    4.2 Develop governance for web API development.

    Outputs

    RACI table that accommodates API development.

    Web API operations governance structure.

    Stakeholder Relations

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}25|cart{/j2store}
    • Related Products: {j2store}25|crosssells{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Strategy and Governance
    • Parent Category Link: /strategy-and-governance

    The challenge

    • Stakeholders come in a wide variety, often with competing and conflicting demands.
    • Some stakeholders are hard to identify. Those hidden agendas may derail your efforts.
    • Understanding your stakeholders' relative importance allows you to prioritize your IT agenda according to the business needs.

    Our advice

    Insight

    • Stakeholder management is an essential factor in how successful you will be.
    • Stakeholder management is a continuous process. The landscape constantly shifts.
    • You must also update your stakeholder management plan and approach on an ongoing basis.

    Impact and results 

    • Use your stakeholder management process to identify, prioritize, and manage key stakeholders effectively.
    • Continue to build on strengthening your relationships with stakeholders. It will help to gain easier buy-in and support for your future initiatives. 

    The roadmap

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    Make the case

    Identify stakeholders

    • Stakeholder Management Analysis Tool (xls)

    Analyze your stakeholders

    Assess the stakeholder's influence, interest, standing, and support to determine priority for future actions 

    Manage your stakeholders

    Develop your stakeholder management and communication plans

    • Stakeholder Management Plan Template (doc)
    • Communication Plan Template (doc)

    Monitor your stakeholder management plan performance

    Measure and monitor the success of your stakeholder management process.

     

     

    Identify and Reduce Agile Contract Risk

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}232|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 8.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $10,000 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 20 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Vendor Management
    • Parent Category Link: /vendor-management
    • Customer maturity levels with Agile are low, with 67% of organizations using Agile for less than five years.
    • Customer competency levels with Agile are also low, with 84% of organizations stating they are below a high level of competency.
    • Contract disputes are the number one or two types of disputes faced by organizations across all industries.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Agile contracts require different wording and protections than traditional or waterfall contracts.
    • Agile buzzwords by themselves do not create an Agile contract.
    • There is a delicate balance between being overly prescriptive in an Agile contract and too lax.

    Impact and Result

    • Identify options for Agile contract provisions.
    • Manage Agile contract risk by selecting the appropriate level of protections for an Agile project.
    • Harness the power of Agile development and collaboration with the vendor while preserving contractual flexibility.
    • Focus on the correct contract clauses to manage Agile risk.

    Identify and Reduce Agile Contract Risk Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should treat Agile contracts differently from traditional or waterfall contracts, and review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the twelve contract clauses that are different for Agile contracts.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Identify and evaluate options

    Use the information in this blueprint and Info-Tech’s Agile Contract Playbook-Checklist to review and assess your Agile contracts, ensuring that the provisions and protections are suitable for Agile contracts specifically.

    • Agile Contracts Playbook-Checklist
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Identify and Reduce Agile Contract Risk

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Identify and Evaluate Options

    The Purpose

    To understand Agile-specific contract clauses, to improve risk identification, and to be more effective at negotiating Agile contract terms.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Increased awareness of how Agile contract provisions are different from traditional or waterfall contracts in 12 key areas.

    Understanding available options.

    Understanding the impact of being too prescriptive.

    Activities

    1.1 Review the Agile Contract Playbook-Checklist.

    1.2 Review 12 contract provisions and reinforce key learnings with exercises.

    Outputs

    Configured Playbook-Checklist as applicable

    Exercise results and debrief

    Review Your Application Strategy

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}82|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 10.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $12,599 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 2 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Architecture & Strategy
    • Parent Category Link: /architecture-and-strategy
    • Over 80% of CXOs experience frustration with IT’s failure to deliver business value.
    • Sixty percent of CEOs believe that improvement is required around IT’s understanding of business goals.
    • Sixty percent of IT professionals know there is an opportunity to run applications more efficiently, eliminating wasteful or low-value activities.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Organizations need to better align their application strategy with their business strategy as they proceed through tactical initiatives.
    • Application strategies provide guidance on how they will help the organization survive and thrive.

    Impact and Result

    Aligning your business with applications through your strategy will not only increase business satisfaction but also help to ensure you’re delivering applications that enable the organization’s goals.

    Review Your Application Strategy Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should have an application strategy and why you should use Info-Tech’s approach to review it. Learn how we can support you in completing this strategy and review.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Review your strategy

    This review guide provides organizations with a detailed assessment of their application strategy, ensuring that the applications enable the business strategy so that the organization can be more effective.The assessment provides criteria and exercises to provide actionable outcomes.

    • Application Strategy Assessment Tool
    • Application Strategy Action Plan Report Template
    • Application Strategy Sample Action Plan Report
    [infographic]

    Manage Requirements in an Agile Environment

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}522|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Requirements & Design
    • Parent Category Link: /requirements-and-design

    The process of navigating from waterfall to Agile can be incredibly challenging. Even more problematic; how do you operate your requirements management practices once there? There traditionally isn’t a role for a business analyst, the traditional keeper of requirements. It isn’t like switching on a light.

    You likely find yourself struggling to deliver high quality solutions and requirements in Agile. This is a challenge for many organizations, regardless of how long they’ve leveraged Agile.

    But you aren’t here for assurances. You’re here for answers and help.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    Agile and requirements management are complementary, not competitors.

    Impact and Result

    Info-Tech’s advice? Why choose? Why have to pick between traditional waterfall and Agile delivery? If Agile without analysis is a recipe for disaster, Agile with analysis is the solution. How can you leverage the Info-Tech approach to align your Agile and requirements management efforts into a powerful combination?

    Manage Requirements in an Agile Environment is your guide.

    Use the contents and exercises of this blueprint to gain a shared understanding of the two disciplines, to find your balance in your approach, to define your thresholds, and ultimately, to prepare for new ways of working.

    Manage Requirements in an Agile Environment Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Manage Requirements in an Agile Environment Blueprint – Agile and Requirements Management are complementary, not competitors

    Provides support and guidance for organizations struggling with their requirements management practices in Agile environments.

    • Manage Requirements in an Agile Environment Storyboard

    2. Agile Requirements Playbook – A practical playbook for aligning your teams, and articulating the guidelines for managing your requirements in Agile.

    The Agile Requirements Playbook becomes THE artifact for your Agile requirements practices. Great for onboarding, reviewing progress, and ensuring a shared understanding of your ways of working.

    • Agile Requirements Playbook

    3. Documentation Calculator – A tool for determining the right level of documentation for your organization, and whether you’re spending too much, or even not enough, on Agile Requirements documentation.

    The Documentation Calculator can inform your documentation decison making, ensuring you're investing just the right amount of time, money, and effort.

    • Documentation Calculator

    4. Agile Requirements Workbook – Supporting tools and templates in advancing your Agile Requirements practice, to be used in conjunction with the Agile Requirements Blueprint, and the Playbook.

    This workbook is designed to capture the results of your exercises in the Manage Requirements in an Agile Environment Storyboard. Each worksheet corresponds to an exercise in the storyboard. This is a tool for you, so customize the content and layout to best suit your product. The workbook is also a living artifact that should be updated periodically as the needs of your team and organization change.

    • Agile Requirements Workbook

    5. Agile Requirements Assessment – Establishes your current Agile requirements maturity, defines your target maturity, and supports planning to get there.

    The Agile Requirements Assessment is a great tool for determining your current capabilities and maturity in Agile and Business Analysis. You can also articulate your target state, which enables the identification of capability gaps, the creation of improvement goals, and a roadmap for maturing your Agile Requirements practice.

    • Agile Requirements Assessment

    Infographic

    Workshop: Manage Requirements in an Agile Environment

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Framing Agile and Business Analysis

    The Purpose

    Sets the context for the organization, to ensure a shared understanding of the benefits of both Agile and business analysis/requirements management.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Have a shared definition of Agile and business analysis / requirements.

    Understand the current state of Agile and business analysis in your organization.

    Activities

    1.1 Define what Agile and business analysis mean in your organization.

    1.2 Agile requirements assessment.

    Outputs

    Alignment on Agile and business analysis / requirements in your organization.

    A current and target state assessment of Agile and business analysis in your organization.

    2 Tailoring Your Approach

    The Purpose

    Confirm you’re going the right way for effective solution delivery.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Confirm the appropriate delivery methodology.

    Activities

    2.1 Confirm your selected methodology.

    Outputs

    Confidence in your selected project delivery methodology.

    3 Defining Your Requirements Thresholds

    The Purpose

    Provides the guardrails for your Agile requirements practice, to define a high-level process, roles and responsibilities, governance and decision-making, and how to deal with change.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Clearly defined interactions between the BA and their partners

    Define a plan for management and governance at the project team level

    Activities

    3.1 Define your agile requirements process.

    3.2 Define your agile requirements RACI.

    3.3 Define your governance.

    3.4 Define your change and backlog refinement plan.

    Outputs

    Agile requirements process.

    Agile requirements RACI.

    A governance and documentation plan.

    A change and backlog refinement approach.

    4 Planning Your Next Steps

    The Purpose

    Provides the action plan to achieve your target state maturity

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Recognize and prepare for the new ways of working for communication, stakeholder engagement, within the team, and across the organization.

    Establish a roadmap for next steps to mature your Agile requirements practice.

    Activities

    4.1 Define your stakeholder communication plan.

    4.2 Identify your capability gaps.

    4.3 Plan your agile requirements roadmap.

    Outputs

    A stakeholder communication plan.

    A list of capability gaps to achieve your desired target state.

    A prioritized roadmap to achieve the target state.

    5 Agile Requirements Techniques (Optional)

    The Purpose

    To provide practical guidance on technique usage, which can enable an improved experience with technical elements of the blueprint.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    An opportunity to learn new tools to support your Agile requirements practice.

    Activities

    5.1 Managing requirements' traceability.

    5.2 Creating and managing user stories.

    5.3 Managing your requirements backlog.

    5.4 Maintaining a requirements library.

    Outputs

    Support and advice for leveraging a given tool or technique.

    Support and advice for leveraging a given tool or technique.

    Support and advice for leveraging a given tool or technique.

    Support and advice for leveraging a given tool or technique.

    Further reading

    Manage Requirements in an Agile Environment

    Agile and requirements management are complementary, not competitors

    Analyst's Perspective

    The temptation when moving to Agile is to deemphasize good requirements practices in favor of perceived speed. If you're not delivering on the needs of the business then you have failed, regardless of how fast you've gone.

    Delivery in Agile doesn't mean you stop needing solid business analysis. In fact, it's even more critical, to ensure your products and projects are adding value. With the rise of Agile, the role of the business analyst has been misunderstood.

    As a result, we often throw out the analysis with the bathwater, thinking we'll be just fine without analysis, documentation, and deliberate action, as the speed and dexterity of Agile is enough.

    Consequently, what we get is wasted time, money, and effort, with solutions that fail to deliver value, or need to be re-worked to get it right.

    The best organizations find balance between these two forces, to align, and gain the benefits of both Agile and business analysis, working in tandem to manage requirements that bring solutions that are "just right".

    This is a picture of Vincent Mirabelli

    Vincent Mirabelli
    Principal Research Director, Applications Delivery and Management
    Info-Tech Research Group

    EXECUTIVE BRIEF

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    The process of navigating from waterfall to Agile can be incredibly challenging. And even more problematic; how do you operate your requirements management practices once there? Since there traditionally isn't a role for a business analyst; the traditional keeper of requirements. it isn't like switching on a light.

    You likely find yourself struggling to deliver high quality solutions and requirements in Agile. This is a challenge for many organizations, regardless of how long they've leveraged Agile.

    But you aren't here for assurances. You're here for answers and help.

    Common Obstacles

    many organizations and teams face is that there are so busy doing Agile that they fail to be Agile.

    Agile was supposed to be the saving grace of project delivery but is misguided in taking the short-term view of "going quickly" at the expense of important elements, such as team formation and interaction, stakeholder engagement and communication, the timing and sequencing of analysis work, decision-making, documentation, and dealing with change.

    The idea that good requirements just happen because you have user stories is wrong. So, requirements remain superficial, as you "can iterate later"…but sometimes later never comes, or doesn't come fast enough.

    Organizations need to be very deliberate when aligning their Agile and requirements management practices. The work is the same. How the work is done is what changes.

    Info-Tech's Approach

    Infotech's advice? Why choose? Why have to pick between traditional waterfall and Agile delivery? If Agile without analysis is a recipe for disaster, Agile with analysis is the solution. And how can you leverage the Info-Tech approach to align your Agile and requirements management efforts into a powerful combination?

    Manage Requirements in an Agile Environment is your guide.

    Use the contents and exercises of this blueprint to gain a shared understanding of the two disciplines, to find your balance in your approach, to define your thresholds, and ultimately, to prepare for new ways of working.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Agile and requirements management are complementary, not competitors.

    The temptation when moving to Agile is to deemphasize good requirements practices in favor of perceived speed. If you're not delivering on the needs of the business, then you have failed, regardless of how fast you've gone.

    Insight summary

    Overarching insight

    Agile and requirements management are complementary, not competitors.

    The temptation when moving to Agile is to deemphasize good requirements practices in favor of perceived speed. If you're not delivering on the needs of the business, then you have failed, regardless of how fast you've gone

    Phase 1 insight

    • The purpose of requirements in waterfall is for approval. The purpose in Agile is for knowledge management, as Agile has no memory.
    • When it comes to the Agile manifesto, "over" does not mean "instead of".
    • In Agile, the what of business analysis does doesn't change. What does change is the how and when that work happens.

    Phase 2 insight

    • Understand your uncertainties; it's a great way to decide what level of Agile (if any) is needed.
    • Finding your "Goldilocks" zone will take time. Be patient.

    Phase 3 insight

    • Right-size your governance, based on team dynamics and project complexity. A good referee knows when to step in, and when to let the game flow.
    • Agile creates a social contract amongst the team, and with their leaders and organization.
    • Documentation needs to be valuable. Do what is acceptable and necessary to move work to future steps. Not documenting also comes with a cost, but one you pay in the future. And that bill will come due, with interest (aka, technical debt, operational inefficiencies, etc.).
    • A lack of acceptable documentation makes it more difficult to have agility. You're constantly revalidating your current state (processes, practices and structure) and re-arguing decisions already made. This slows you down more than maintaining documentation ever would.

    Phase 4 insight

    • Making Agile predictable is hard, because people are not predictable; people are prone to chaos.

    There have been many challenges with waterfall delivery

    It turns out waterfall is not that great at reducing risk and ensuring value delivery after all

    • Lack of flexibility
    • Difficulty in measuring progress
    • Difficulties with scope creep
    • Limited stakeholder involvement
    • Long feedback loops

    48%
    Had project deadlines more than double

    85%
    Exceeded their original budget by at least 20%

    25%
    At least doubled their original budget

    This is an image of the waterfall project results

    Source: PPM Express.

    Agile was meant to address the shortcomings of waterfall

    The wait for solutions was too long for our business partners. The idea of investing significant time, money, and resources upfront, building an exhaustive and complete vision of the desired state, and then waiting months or even years to get that solution, became unpalatable for them. And rightfully so. Once we cast a light on the pains, it became difficult to stay with the status quo. Given that organizations evolve at a rapid pace, what was a pain at the beginning of an initiative may not be so even 6 months later.

    Agile became the answer.

    Since its' first appearance nearly 20 years ago, Agile has become the methodology of choice for a many of organizations. According to the 15th Annual State of Agile report, Agile adoption within software development teams increased from 37% in 2020 to 86% in 2021.

    Adopting Agile led to challenges with requirements

    Requirements analysis, design maturity, and management are critical for a successful Agile transformation.

    "One of the largest sources of failure we have seen on large projects is an immature Agile implementation in the context of poorly defined requirements."
    – "Large Scale IT Projects – From Nightmare to Value Creation"

    "Requirements maturity is more important to project outcomes than methodology."
    – "Business Analysis Benchmark: Full Report"

    "Mature Agile practices spend 28% of their time on analysis and design."
    – "Quantitative Analysis of Agile Methods Study (2017): Twelve Major Findings"

    "There exists a Requirements Premium… organizations using poor practices spent 62% more on similarly sized projects than organizations using the best requirements practices."
    – "The Business Case for Agile Business Analysis" - Requirements Engineering Magazine

    Strong stakeholder satisfaction with requirements results in higher satisfaction in other areas

    This is an image of a bar graph comparing the percentage of respondents with high stakeholder satisfaction, to the percentage of respondents with low stakeholder satisfaction for four different categories.  these include: Availability of IT Capacity to Complete Projects; Overall IT Projects; IT Projects Meet Business Needs; Overall IT Satisfaction

    N= 324 small organizations from Info-Tech Research Group's CIO Business Vision diagnostic.

    Note: High satisfaction was classified as organizations with a score greater or equal to eight and low satisfaction was every organization that scored below eight on the same questions.

    Info-Tech's Agile requirements framework

    This is an image of Info-Tech's Agile requirements framework.  The three main categories are: Sprint N(-1); Sprint N; Sprint N(+1)

    Agile requirements are a balancing act

    Collaboration

    Many subject matter experts are necessary to create accurate requirements, but their time is limited too.

    Communication

    Stakeholders should be kept informed throughout the requirements gathering process, but you need to get the right information to the right people.

    Documentation

    Recording, organizing, and presenting requirements are essential, but excessive documentation will slow time to delivery.

    Control

    Establishing control points in your requirements gathering process can help confirm, verify, and approve requirements accurately, but stage gates limit delivery.

    What changes for the business analyst?

    In Agile, the what of business analysis does not change.

    What does change is the how and when that work happens.

    Business analysts need to focus on six key elements when managing requirements in Agile.

    • Team formation and interaction
    • Stakeholder engagement and communication
    • The timing and sequencing of their work
    • Decision-making
    • Documentation
    • Dealing with change

    Where does the business analysis function fit on an Agile team?

    Team formation is key, as Agile is a team sport

    A business analyst in an Agile team typically interacts with several different roles, including:

    • The product owner,
    • The Sponsor or Executive
    • The development team,
    • Other stakeholders such as customers, end-users, and subject matter experts
    • The Design team,
    • Security,
    • Testing,
    • Deployment.

    This is an image the roles who typically interact with a Business Analyst.

    How we do our requirements work will change

    • Team formation and interaction
    • Stakeholder engagement and communication
    • The timing and sequencing of their work
    • Decision-making
    • Documentation
    • Dealing with change

    As a result, you'll need to focus on;

    • Emphasizing flexibility
    • Enabling continuous delivery
    • Enhancing collaboration and communication
    • Developing a user-centered approach

    Get stakeholders on board with Agile requirements

    1. Stakeholder feedback and management support are key components of a successful Agile Requirements.
    2. Stakeholders can see a project's progression and provide critical feedback about its success at critical milestones.
    3. Management helps teams succeed by trusting them to complete projects with business value at top of mind and by removing impediments that are inhibiting their productivity.
    4. Agile will bring a new mindset and significant numbers of people, process, and technology changes that stakeholders and management may not be accustomed to. Working through these issues in requirements management enables a smoother rollout.
    5. Management will play a key role in ensuring long-term Agile requirements success and ultimately rolling it out to the rest of the organization.
    6. The value of leadership involvement has not changed even though responsibilities will. The day-to-day involvement in projects will change but continual feedback will ultimately dictate the success or failure of a project.

    Measuring your success

    Tracking metrics and measuring your progress

    As you implement the actions from this Blueprint, you should see measurable improvements in;

    • Team and stakeholder satisfaction
    • Requirements quality
    • Documentation cost

    Without sacrificing time to delivery

    Metric Description and motivation
    Team satisfaction (%) Expect team satisfaction to increase as a result of clearer role delineation and value contribution.
    Stakeholder satisfaction (%) Expect Stakeholder satisfaction to similarly increase, as requirements quality increases, bringing increased value
    Requirements rework Measures the quality of requirements from your Agile Projects. Expect that the Requirements Rework will decrease, in terms of volume/frequency.
    Cost of documentation Quantifies the cost of documentation, including Elicitation, Analysis, Validation, Presentation, and Management
    Time to delivery Balancing Metric. We don't want improvements in other at the expense of time to delivery

    Info-Tech's methodology for Agile requirements

    1. Framing Agile and Business Analysis

    2. Tailoring Your Approach

    3. Defining Your Requirements Thresholds

    4. Planning Your Next Steps

    Phase Activities

    1.1 Understand the benefits and limitations of Agile and business analysis

    1.2 Align Agile and business analysis within your organization

    2.1 Decide the best-fit approach for delivery

    2.2 Manage your requirements backlog

    3.1 Define project roles and responsibilities

    3.2 Define your level of acceptable documentation

    3.3 Manage requirements as an asset

    3.4 Define your requirements change management plan

    4.1 Preparing new ways of working

    4.2 Develop a roadmap for next steps

    Phase Outcomes

    Recognize the benefits and detriments of both Agile and BA.

    Understand the current state of Agile and business analysis in your organization.

    Confirm the appropriate delivery methodology.

    Manage your requirements backlog.

    Connect the business need to user story.

    Clearly defined interactions between the BA and their partners.

    Define a plan for management and governance at the project team level.

    Documentation and tactics that are right-sized for the need.

    Recognize and prepare for the new ways of working for communication, stakeholder engagement, within the team, and across the organization.

    Establish a roadmap for next steps to mature your Agile requirements practice.

    Blueprint tools and templates

    Key deliverable:

    This is a screenshot from the Agile Requirements Playbook

    Agile Requirements Playbook

    A practical playbook for aligning your teams and articulating the guidelines for managing your requirements in Agile

    Each step of this blueprint is accompanied by supporting deliverables to help you accomplish your goals:

    This is a screenshot from the Documentation Calculator

    Documentation Calculator

    A tool to help you answer the question: What is the right level of Agile requirements documentation for my organization?

    This is a screenshot from the Agile Requirements Assessment

    Agile Requirements Assessment

    Establishes your current maturity level, defines your target state, and supports planning to get there.

    This is a screenshot from the Agile Requirements Workbook

    Agile Requirements Workbook

    Supporting tools and templates in advancing your Agile requirements practice, to be used with the Agile Requirements Blueprint and Playbook.

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    "Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful."

    Guided Implementation

    "Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track."

    Workshop

    "We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place."

    Consulting

    "Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project."

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

    Workshop Overview

    Contact your account representative for more information.
    workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8889

    Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5
    1. Framing Agile and Business Analysis / 2. Tailoring Your Approach 3. Defining Your Requirements
    Thresholds
    3. Defining Your Requirements Thresholds / 4. Planning Your Next Steps (OPTIONAL) Agile Requirements Techniques (a la carte) Next Steps and Wrap-Up (Offsite)

    Activities

    What does Agile mean in your organization? What do requirements mean in your organization?

    Agile Requirements Assessment

    Confirm your selected methodology

    Define your Agile requirements process

    Define your Agile requirements RACI (Optional)

    Define your Agile requirements governance

    Defining your change management plan

    Define your

    communication plan

    Capability gap list

    Planning your Agile requirements roadmap

    Managing requirements traceability

    Creating and managing user stories

    Managing your requirements backlog

    Maintaining a requirements library

    Develop Agile Requirements Playbook

    Complete in-progress deliverables from previous four days.

    Set up review time for workshop deliverables and next steps

    Outcomes

    Shared definition of Agile and business analysis / requirements

    Understand the current state of Agile and business analysis in your organization

    Agile requirements process

    Agile requirements RACI (Optional)

    Defined Agile requirements governance and documentation plan

    Change and backlog refinement plan

    Stakeholder communication plan

    Action plan and roadmap for maturing your Agile requirements practice

    Practical knowledge and practice about various tactics and techniques in support of your Agile requirements efforts

    Completed Agile Requirements Playbook

    Guided Implementation

    Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4

    Call #1: Scope objectives, and your specific challenges.

    Call #4: Define your approach to project delivery.

    Call #6: Define your Agile requirements process.

    Call #9: Identify gaps from current to target state maturity.

    Call #2: Assess current maturity.

    Call #5: Managing your requirements backlog.

    Call #7: Define roles and responsibilities.

    Call #10: Pprioritize next steps to mature your Agile requirements practice.

    Call #3: Identify target-state capabilities.

    Call #8: Define your change and backlog refinement approach.

    A Guided Implementation (GI) is a series of calls with an Info-Tech analyst to help implement our best practices in your organization.

    A typical GI is 10 calls over the course of 4 to 6 months.

    Framing Agile and Business Analysis

    Phase 1

    Framing Agile and Business Analysis

    Phase 1Phase 2Phase 3Phase 4

    1.1 Understand the benefits and limitations of Agile and business analysis

    1.2 Align Agile and business analysis within your organization

    2.1 Confirm the best-fit approach for delivery

    2.2 manage your requirements backlog

    3.1 Define project roles and responsibilities

    3.2 define your level of acceptable documentation

    3.3 Manage requirements as an asset

    3.4 Define your requirements change management plan

    4.1 Preparing new ways of working

    4.2 Develop a roadmap for next steps

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • EXERCISE: What do Agile and requirements mean in your organization?
    • ASSESSMENT: Agile requirements assessment
    • KEY DELIVERABLE: Agile Requirements Playbook

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • Business analyst and project team
    • Stakeholders
    • Sponsor/Executive

    Managing Requirements in an Agile Environment

    Step 1.1

    Understand the benefits and limitations of Agile and business analysis

    Activities

    1.1.1 Define what Agile and business analysis mean in your organization

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Business analyst and project team
    • Sponsor/Executive

    Outcomes of this step

    • Recognize the benefits and detriments of both Agile and business analysis

    Framing Agile and Business Analysis

    There have been many challenges with waterfall delivery

    It turns out waterfall is not that great at reducing risk and ensuring value delivery after all

    • Lack of flexibility
    • Difficulty in measuring progress
    • Difficulties with scope creep
    • Limited stakeholder involvement
    • Long feedback loops

    48%
    Had project deadlines more than double

    85%
    Exceeded their original budget by at least 20%

    25%
    At least doubled their original budget

    This is an image of the Waterfall Project Results

    Source: PPM Express.

    Business analysis had a clear home in waterfall

    Business analysts had historically been aligned to specific lines of business, in support of their partners in their respective domains. Somewhere along the way, the function was moved to IT. Conceptually this made sense, in that it allowed BAs to provide technical solutions to complex business problems. This had the unintended result of lost domain knowledge, and connection to the business.

    It all starts with the business. IT enables business goals. The closer you can get to the business, the better.

    Business analysts were the main drivers of helping to define the business requirements, or needs, and then decompose those into solution requirements, to develop the best option to solve those problems, or address those needs. And the case for good analysis was clear. The later a poor requirement was caught, the more expensive it was to fix. And if requirements were poor, there was no way to know until much later in the project lifecycle, when the cost to correct them was exponentially higher, to the tune of 10-100x the initial cost.

    This is an image of a graph showing the cost multiplier for Formulating Requirements, Architecture Design, Development, Testing and, Operations

    Adapted from PPM Express. "Why Projects Fail: Business Analysis is the Key".

    Agile was meant to address the shortcomings of waterfall

    The wait for solutions was too long for our business partners. The idea of investing significant time, money, and resources upfront, building an exhaustive and complete vision of the desired state, and then waiting months or even years to get that solution became unpalatable for them. And rightfully so. Once we cast a light on the pains, it became difficult to stand pat in the current state. And besides, organizations evolve at a rapid pace. What was a pain at the beginning of an initiative may not be so even six months later.

    Agile became the answer.

    Since its first appearance nearly 20 years ago, Agile has become the methodology of choice for a huge swathe of organizations. According to the 15th Annual State of Agile report, Agile adoption within software development teams increased from 37% in 2020 to 86% in 2021.

    To say that's significant is an understatement.

    The four core values of Agile helped shift focus

    According to the Agile manifesto, "We value. . ."

    This is an image of what is valued according to the Agile Manifesto.

    "…while there is value in the items on the right, we value the items on the left more."

    Source: Agilemanifesto, 2001

    Agile has made significant inroads in IT and beyond

    94% of respondents report using Agile practices in their organization

    according to Digital.AI's "The 15th State of Agile Report"

    That same report notes a steady expansion of Agile outside of IT, as other areas of the organization seek to benefit from increased agility and responsiveness, including Human Resources, Finance and Marketing.

    While it addressed some problems…

    This is an image of the Waterfall Project Results, compared to Agile Product Results.

    "Agile projects are 37% faster to market than [the] industry average"

    (Requirements Engineering Magazine, 2017)

    • Business requirements documents are massive and unreadable
    • Waterfall erects barriers and bottlenecks between the business and the development team
    • It's hard to define the solution at the outset of a project
    • There's a long turnaround between requirements work and solution delivery
    • Locking in requirements dictates an often-inflexible solution. And the costs to make changes tend to add up.

    …Implementing Agile led to other challenges

    This is an image of a series of thought bubbles, each containing a unique challenge resulting from implementing Agile.

    Adopting Agile led to challenges with requirements

    Requirements analysis, design maturity, and management are critical for a successful Agile transformation.

    "One of the largest sources of failure we have seen on large projects is an immature Agile implementation in the context of poorly defined requirements."
    – BCG, 2015

    "Requirements maturity is more important to project outcomes than methodology."
    – IAG Consulting, 2009.

    "Mature Agile practices spend 28% of their time on analysis and design."
    – InfoQ, 2017."

    "There exists a Requirements Premium… organizations using poor practices spent 62% more on similarly sized projects than organizations using the best requirements practices."
    – Requirements Engineering Magazine, 2017

    Strong stakeholder satisfaction with requirements results in higher satisfaction in other areas

    This is an image of a bar graph comparing the percentage of respondents with high stakeholder satisfaction, to the percentage of respondents with low stakeholder satisfaction for four different categories.  these include: Availability of IT Capacity to Complete Projects; Overall IT Projects; IT Projects Meet Business Needs; Overall IT Satisfaction

    N= 324 small organizations from Info-Tech Research Group's CIO Business Vision diagnostic.

    Note: High satisfaction was classified as organizations with a score greater or equal to eight and low satisfaction was every organization that scored below eight on the same questions.

    Agile is being misinterpreted as an opportunity to bypass planning and analysis activities

    Agile is a highly effective tool.

    This isn't about discarding Agile. It is being used for things completely outside of what was originally intended. When developing products or code, it is in its element. However, outside of that realm, its being used to bypass business analysis activities, which help define the true customer and business need.

    Business analysts were forced to adapt and shift focus. Overnight they morphed into product owners, or no longer had a place on the team. Requirements and analysis took a backseat.

    The result?

    Increased rework, decreased stakeholder satisfaction, and a lot of wasted money and effort.

    "Too often, the process of two-week sprints becomes the thing, and the team never gets the time and space to step back and obsess over what is truly needed to delight customers."
    Harvard Business Review, 9 April 2021.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Requirements in Agile are the same, but the purpose of requirements changes.

    • The purpose of requirements in waterfall is for stakeholder approval.
    • The purpose of requirements in Agile is knowledge management; to maintain a record of the current state.

    Many have misinterpreted the spirit of Agile and waterfall

    The stated principles of waterfall say nothing of how work is to be linear.

    This is an image of a comparison between using Agile and Being Prescriptive.This is an image of Royce's 5 principles for success.

    Source: Royce, Dr. Winston W., 1970.

    For more on Agile methodology, check out Info-Tech's Agile Research Centre

    How did the pendulum swing so far?

    Shorter cycles of work made requirements management more difficult. But the answer isn't to stop doing it.

    Organizations went from engaging business stakeholders up front, and then not until solution delivery, to forcing those partners to give up their resources to the project. From taking years to deliver a massive solution (which may or may not even still fit the need) to delivering in rapid cycles called sprints.

    This tug-of-war is costing organizations significant time, money, and effort.

    Your approach to requirements management needs to be centered. We can start to make that shift by better aligning our Agile and business analysis practices. Outside of the product space, Agile needs to be combined with other disciplines (Harvard Business Review, 2021) to be effective.

    Agility is important. Though it is not a replacement for approach or strategy (RCG Global Services, 2022). In Agile, team constraints are leveraged because of time. There is a failure to develop new capabilities to address the business needs Harvard Business Review, 2021).

    Agility needs analysis.

    Agile requirements are a balancing act

    Collaboration

    Many subject matter experts are necessary to create accurate requirements, but their time is limited too.

    Communication

    Stakeholders should be kept informed throughout the requirements gathering process, but you need to get the right information to the right people.

    Documentation

    Recording, organizing, and presenting requirements are essential, but excessive documentation will slow time to delivery.

    Control

    Establishing control points in your requirements gathering process can help confirm, verify, and approve requirements accurately, but stage gates limit delivery.

    Start by defining what the terms mean in your organization

    We do this because there isn't even agreement by the experts on what the terms "Agile" and "business analysis" mean, so let's establish a definition within the context of your organization.

    1.1.1 What do Agile and business analysis mean in your organization?

    Estimated time: 30 Minutes

    1. Explore the motivations behind the need for aligning Agile with business analysis. Are there any current challenges related to outputs, outcomes, quality? How can the team and organization align the two more effectively for the purposes of requirements management?
    2. Gather the appropriate stakeholders to discuss their definition of the terms "Agile" and "business analysis" It can be related to their experience, practice, or things they've read or heard.
    3. Brainstorm and document all shared thoughts and perspectives.
    4. Synthesize those thoughts and perspectives into a shared definition of each term, of a sentence or two.
    5. Revisit this definition as needed, and as your Agile requirements efforts evolve.

    Input

    • Challenges and experiences/perspectives related to Agile and business requirements

    Output

    • A shared definition of Agile and business analysis, to help guide alignment on Agile requirements management

    Materials

    • Agile Requirements Workbook

    Participants

    • Business Analyst(s)
    • Project Team
    • Sponsor/Executive
    • Relevant Stakeholders

    Build your Agile Requirements Playbook

    Keep the outcomes of this blueprint in a single document

    Share at the beginning of a new project, as part of team member onboarding, and revisit as your practice matures.

    This is a series of three screenshots from the Agile Requirements Playbook.

    Your Agile Requirements Playbook will include

    • Your shared definition of Agile and business analysis for your organization
    • The Agile Requirements Maturity Assessment
    • A Methodology Selection Matrix
    • Agile requirements RACI
    • A defined Agile requirements process
    • Documentation Calculator
    • Your Requirements Repository Information
    • Capability Gap List (from current to target state)
    • Target State Improvement Roadmap and Action Plan

    Step 1.2

    Align Agile and Business Analysis Within Your Organization

    Activities

    1.2.1 Assess your Agile requirements maturity

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Business Analyst and Project Team
    • Stakeholders
    • Sponsor/Executive

    Outcomes of this step

    • Complete the Agile Requirements Maturity Assessment to establish your current and target states

    Framing Agile and Business Analysis

    Consider the question: "Why Agile?"

    What is the driving force behind that decision?

    There are many reasons to leverage the power of Agile within your organization, and specifically as part of your requirements management efforts. And it shouldn't just be to improve productivity. That's only one aspect.
    Begin by asking, "Why Agile?" Are you looking to improve:

    • Time to market
    • Team engagement
    • Product quality
    • Customer satisfaction
    • Stakeholder engagement
    • Employee satisfaction
    • Consistency in delivery of value
    • Predictably of your releases

    Or a combination of the above?

    Info-Tech Insight

    Project delivery methodologies aren't either/or. You don't have to be 100% waterfall or 100% Agile. Select the right approach for your project, product, or service.

    In the end, your business partners don't want projects delivered faster, they want value faster!

    For more on understanding Agile, check out the Implement Agile Practices That Work Blueprint

    Responses to a 2019 KPMG survey:

    13% said that their top management fully supports Agile transformation.

    76% of organizations did not agree that their organization supports Agile culture.

    62% of top management believe Agile has no implications for them.

    What changes for the business analyst?

    Business analysts need to focus on six key elements when managing requirements in Agile.

    • Team formation and interaction
    • Stakeholder engagement and communication
    • The timing and sequencing of their work
    • Decision-making
    • Documentation
    • Dealing with change

    In Agile, the what of business analysis does not change.

    What does change is the how and when that work happens.

    1.2.1 Assess your Agile requirements maturity

    This is a series of screenshots from the Agile Requirements Maturity Assessment.

    1.2.1 Assess your Agile requirements maturity

    Estimated time: 30 Minutes

      1. Using the Agile Requirements Maturity Assessment, gather all appropriate stakeholders, and discuss and score the current state of your practice. Scoring can be done by:
        1. Consensus: Generally better with a smaller group, where the group agrees the score and documents the result
        2. Average: Have everyone score individually, and aggregate the results into an average, which is then entered.
        3. Weighted Average: As above, but weight the individual scores by individual or line of business to get a weighted average.
      2. When current state is complete, revisit to establish target state (or hold as a separate session) using the same scoring approach as in current state.
        1. Recognize that there is a cost to maturity, so don't default to the highest score by default.
        2. Resist the urge at this early stage to generate ideas to navigate from current to target state. We will re-visit this exercise in Phase 4, once we've defined other pieces of our process and practice.

    Input

    • Participant knowledge and experience

    Output

    • A current and target state assessment of your Agile requirements practice

    Materials

    • Agile Requirements Maturity Assessment

    Participants

    • Business Analyst(s)
    • Project Team
    • Sponsor/Executive
    • Relevant Stakeholders

    Tailoring Your Approach

    Phase 2

    Phase 1Phase 2Phase 3Phase 4

    1.1 Understand the benefits and limitations of Agile and business analysis

    1.2 Align Agile and business analysis within your organization

    2.1 Confirm the best-fit approach for delivery

    2.2 manage your requirements backlog

    3.1 Define project roles and responsibilities

    3.2 define your level of acceptable documentation

    3.3 Manage requirements as an asset

    3.4 Define your requirements change management plan

    4.1 Preparing new ways of working

    4.2 Develop a roadmap for next steps

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Selecting the appropriate delivery methodology
    • Managing your requirements backlog
    • Tracing from business need to user story

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • Business Analyst(s)
    • Project Team
    • Sponsor/Executive
    • Relevant Stakeholders

    Managing Requirements in an Agile Environment

    Step 2.1

    Confirm the Best-fit Approach for Delivery

    Activities

    2.1.1 Confirm your methodology

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Business Analyst(s)
    • Project Team
    • Sponsor/Executive
    • Relevant Stakeholders

    Outcomes of this step

    • A review of potential delivery methodologies to select the appropriate, best-fit approach to your projects

    Confirming you're using the best approach doesn't have be tricky

    Selecting the right approach (or confirming you're on the right track) is easier when you assess two key inputs to your project; your level of certainty about the solution, and the level of complexity among the different variables and inputs to your project, such as team experience and training, the number of impacted stakeholders or context. lines of business, and the organizational

    Solution certainty refers to the level of understanding of the problem and the solution at the start of the project. In projects with high solution certainty, the requirements and solutions are well defined, and the project scope is clear. In contrast, projects with low solution certainty have vague or changing requirements, and the solutions are not well understood.

    Project complexity refers to the level of complexity of the project, including the number of stakeholders, the number of deliverables, and the level of technical complexity. In projects with high complexity, there are many stakeholders with different priorities, many deliverables, and high technical complexity. In contrast, projects with low complexity have fewer stakeholders, fewer deliverables, and lower technical complexity.

    "Agile is a fantastic approach when you have no clue how you're going to solve a problem"

    • Ryan Folster, Consulting Services Manager, Business Analysis, Dimension Data

    Use Info-Tech's methodology selection matrix

    Waterfall methodology is best suited for projects with high solution certainty and high complexity. This is because the waterfall model follows a linear and sequential approach, where each phase of the project is completed before moving on to the next. This makes it ideal for projects where the requirements and solutions are well-defined, and the project scope is clear.

    On the other hand, Agile methodology is best suited for projects with low solution certainty. Agile follows an iterative and incremental approach, where the requirements and solutions are detailed and refined throughout the project. This makes it ideal for projects where the requirements and solutions are vague or changing.

    Note that there are other models that exist for determining which path to take, should this approach not fit within your organization.

    Use info-tech's-methodology-selection-matrix

    This is an image of Info-Tech’s methodology selection matrix

    Adapted from The Chaos Report, 2015 (The Standish Group)

    Download the Agile Requirements Workbook

    2.1.1 Confirm your methodology

    Estimated time: 30 Minutes

    1. Using the Agile Requirements Workbook, find the tab labelled "Methodology Assessment" and answer the questions to establish your complexity and certainty scores, where;

    1 = Strongly disagree
    2 = Disagree
    3 = Neutral
    4 = Agree
    5 = Strongly agree.

    1. In the same workbook, plot the results in the grid on the tab labelled "Methodology Matrix".
    2. Projects falling into Green are good fits for Agile. Yellow are viable. And Red may not be a great fit for Agile.
    3. Note: Ultimately, the choice of methodology is yours. Recognize there may be additional challenges when a project is too complex, or uncertainty is high.

    Input

    • Current project complexity and solution certainty

    Output

    • A clear choice of delivery methodology

    Materials

    • Agile Requirements Workbook

    Participants

    • Business Analyst(s)
    • Project Team
    • Sponsor/Executive
    • Relevant Stakeholders

    Step 2.2

    Manage Your Requirements Backlog

    Activities

    2.2.1 Create your user stories

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Business Analyst(s)
    • Project Team
    • Sponsor/Executive
    • Relevant Stakeholders

    Outcomes of this step

    • Understand how to convert requirements into user stories, which populate the Requirements Backlog.

    Tailoring Your Approach

    There is a hierarchy to requirements

    This is a pyramid, with the base being: Solution Requirements; The middle being: Stakeholder Requirements; and the Apex being: Business Requirements.
    • Higher-level statements of the goals, objectives, or needs of the enterprise.
    • Business requirements focus on the needs of the organization, and not the stakeholders within it.

    Defines

    Intended benefits and outcomes

    • Statements of the needs of a particular stakeholder or class of stakeholders, and how that stakeholder will interact with a solution.

    Why it is needed, and by who

    • Describes the characteristics of a solution that meets business requirements and stakeholder requirements. Functional describes the behavior and information that the solution will manage. They describe capabilities the system will be able to perform in terms of behaviors or operations. Non-functional represents constraints on the ultimate solution and tends to be less negotiable.

    What is needed, and how its going to be achieved

    Connect the dots with a traceability matrix

    Business requirements describe what a company needs in order to achieve its goals and objectives. Solution requirements describe how those needs will be met. User stories are a way to express the functionality that a solution will provide from the perspective of an end user.

    A traceability matrix helps clearly connect and maintain your requirements.

    To connect business requirements to solution requirements, you can start by identifying the specific needs that the business has and then determining how those needs can be met through technology or other solutions; or what the solution needs to do to meet the business need. So, if the business requirement is to increase online sales, a solution requirement might include implementing a shopping cart feature on your company website.

    Once you have identified the solution requirements, you can then use those to create user stories. A user story describes a specific piece of functionality that the solution will provide from the perspective of a user.

    For example, "As a customer, I want to be able to add items to my shopping cart so that I can purchase them." This user story is directly tied to the solution requirement of implementing a shopping cart feature.

    Tracing from User Story back up to Business Requirement is essential in ensuring your solutions support your organization's strategic vison and objectives.

    This is an image of a traceability matrix for Business Requirements.

    Download the Info-Tech Requirements Traceability Matrix

    Improve the quality of your solution requirements

    A solution requirement is a statement that clearly outlines the functional capability that the business needs from a system or application.

    There are several attributes to look for in requirements:

    Verifiable

    Unambiguous

    Complete

    Consistent

    Achievable

    Traceable

    Unitary

    Agnostic

    Stated in a way that can be easily tested

    Free of subjective terms and can only be interpreted in one way

    Contains all relevant information

    Does not conflict with other requirements

    Possible to accomplish with budgetary and technological constraints

    Trackable from inception through to testing

    Addresses only one thing and cannot be decomposed into multiple requirements

    Doesn't pre-suppose a specific vendor or product

    For more on developing high quality requirements, check out the Improve Requirements Gathering Blueprint

    Prioritize your requirements

    When everything is a priority, nothing is a priority.

    Prioritization is the process of ranking each requirement based on its importance to project success. Each requirement should be assigned a priority level. The delivery team will use these priority levels to ensure efforts are targeted toward the proper requirements as well as to plan features available on each release. Use the MoSCoW Model of Prioritization to effectively order your requirements.

    The MoSCoW Model of Prioritization

    This is an image of The MoSCoW Model of Prioritization

    The MoSCoW model was introduced by Dai Clegg of Oracle UK in 1994

    (Source: ProductPlan).

    Base your prioritization on the right set of criteria

    Criteria Description
    Regulatory and legal compliance These requirements will be considered mandatory.
    Policy compliance Unless an internal policy can be altered or an exception can be made, these requirements will be considered mandatory.
    Business value significance Give a higher priority to high-value requirements.
    Business risk Any requirement with the potential to jeopardize the entire project should be given a high priority and implemented early.
    Likelihood of success Especially in proof-of-concept projects, it is recommended that requirements have good odds.
    Implementation complexity Give a higher priority to low implementation difficulty requirements.
    Alignment with strategy Give a higher priority to requirements that enable the corporate strategy.
    Urgency Prioritize requirements based on time sensitivity.
    Dependencies A requirement on its own may be low priority, but if it supports a high-priority requirement, then its priority must match it.

    Info-Tech Insight

    It is easier to prioritize requirements if they have already been collapsed, resolved, and rewritten. There is no point in prioritizing every requirement that is elicited up front when some of them will eventually be eliminated.

    Manage solution requirements in a Product backlog

    What is a backlog?

    Agile teams are familiar with the use of a Sprint Backlog, but in Requirements Management, a Product Backlog is a more appropriate choice.

    A product backlog and a Sprint backlog are similar in that they are both lists of items that need to be completed in order to deliver a product or project, but there are some key differences between the two.

    A product backlog is a list of all the features, user stories, and requirements that are needed for a product or project. It is typically created and maintained by the business analyst or product owner and is used to prioritize and guide the development of the product.

    A Sprint backlog, on the other hand, is a list of items specifically for an upcoming sprint, which is an iteration of work in Scrum. The Sprint backlog is created by the development team and is used to plan and guide the work that will be done during the sprint. The items in the Sprint backlog are typically taken from the product backlog and are prioritized based on their importance and readiness.

    For more on building effective product backlogs, visit Deliver on Your Digital Product Vision

    A backlog stores and organizes requirements at various stages

    Your backlog must give you a holistic understanding of demand for change in the product.

    A well-formed backlog can be thought of as a DEEP backlog

    Detailed appropriately: Requirements are broken down and refined as necessary

    Emergent: The backlog grows and evolves over time as requirements are added and removed.

    Estimated: The effort to deliver a requirement is estimated at each tier.

    Prioritized: A requirement's value and priority are determined at each tier.

    This is an image of an inverted funnel, with the top being labeled: Ideas; The middle being labeled: Qualified; and the bottom being labeled: Ready.

    Adapted from Essential Scrum

    Ensure requests and requirements are ready for development

    Clearly define what it means for a requirement, change, or maintenance request to be ready for development.

    This will help ensure the value and scope of each functionality and change are clear and well understood by both developers and stakeholders before the start of the sprint. The definition of ready should be two-fold: ready for the backlog, and ready for coding.

    1. Create a checklist that indicates when a requirement or request is ready for the development backlog. Consider the following questions:
      1. Is the requirement or request in the correct format?
      2. Does the desired functionality or change have significant business value?
      3. Can the requirement or request be reasonably completed within defined release timelines under the current context?
      4. Does the development team agree with the budget and points estimates?
      5. Is there an understanding of what the requirement or request means from the stakeholder or user perspective?
    2. Create a checklist that indicates when a requirement or request is ready for development. Consider the following questions:
      1. Have the requirements and requests been prioritized in the backlog?
      2. Has the team sufficiently collaborated on how the desired functionality or change can be completed?
      3. Do the tasks in each requirement or request contain sufficient detail and direction to begin development?
      4. Can the requirement or request be broken down into smaller pieces?

    Converting solution requirements into user stories

    Define the user

    Who will be interacting with the product or feature being developed? This will help to focus the user story on the user's needs and goals.

    Create the story

    Create the user story using the following template: "As a [user], I want [feature] so that [benefit]."
    This helps articulate the user's need and the value that the requirement will provide.

    Decompose

    User stories are typically too large to be implemented in a single sprint, so they should be broken down into smaller, more manageable tasks.

    Prioritize

    User stories are typically too large to be implemented in a single sprint, so they should be broken down into smaller, more manageable tasks.

    2.2.1 Create your user stories

    Estimated time: 60 Minutes

    1. Gather the project team and relevant stakeholders. Have access to your current list of solution requirements.
    2. Leverage the approach on previous slide "Converting Solution Requirements into User Stories" to generate a collection of user stories.

    NOTE: There is not a 1:1 relationship between requirements and user stories.
    It is possible that a single requirement will have multiple user stories, and similarly, that a single user story will apply to multiple solution requirements.

    Input

    • Requirements
    • Use Case Template

    Output

    • A collection of user stories

    Materials

    • Current Requirements

    Participants

    • Business Analyst(s)
    • Project Team
    • Relevant Stakeholders

    Use the INVEST model to create good user stories

    At this point your requirements should be high-level stories. The goal is to refine your backlog items, so they are . . .

    A vertical image of the Acronym: INVEST, taken from the first letter of each bolded word in the column to the right of the image.

    Independent: Ideally your user stories can be built in any order (i.e. independent from each other). This allows you to prioritize based on value and not get caught up in sequencing and prerequisites.
    Negotiable: As per the Agile principle, collaboration over contracts. Your user stories are meant to facilitate collaboration between the developer and the business. Therefore, they should be built to allow negotiation between all parties.
    Valuable: A user story needs to state the value so it can be effectively prioritized, but also so developers know what they are building.
    Estimable: As opposed to higher-level approximation given to epics, user stories need more accuracy in their estimates in order to, again, be effectively prioritized, but also so teams can know what can fit into a sprint or release plans.
    Small: User stories should be small enough for a number of them to fit into a sprint. However, team size and velocity will impact how many can be completed. A general guideline is that your teams should be able to deliver multiple stories in a sprint.
    Testable: Your stories need to be testable, which means they must have defined acceptance criteria and any related test cases as defined in your product quality standards.
    Source: Agile For All

    Defining Your Requirements Thresholds

    Phase 3

    Defining Your Requirements Thresholds

    Phase 1Phase 2Phase 3Phase 4

    1.1 Understand the benefits and limitations of Agile and business analysis

    1.2 Align Agile and business analysis within your organization

    2.1 Confirm the best-fit approach for delivery

    2.2 manage your requirements backlog

    3.1 Define project roles and responsibilities

    3.2 define your level of acceptable documentation

    3.3 Manage requirements as an asset

    3.4 Define your requirements change management plan

    4.1 Preparing new ways of working

    4.2 Develop a roadmap for next steps

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Assigning roles and responsibilities optional (Tool: RACI)
    • Define your Agile requirements process
    • Calculate the cost of your documentation (Tool: Documentation Calculator)
    • Define your backlog refinement plan

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • Business Analyst(s)
    • Project Team
    • Sponsor/Executive
    • Relevant Stakeholders

    Managing Requirements in an Agile Environment

    Step 3.1

    Define Project Roles and Responsibilities

    Activities

    3.1.1 Define your Agile requirements RACI (optional)

    3.1.2 Define your Agile requirements process

    Defining Your Requirements Thresholds

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Business Analyst(s)
    • Project Team
    • Sponsor/Executive
    • Relevant Stakeholders

    Outcomes of this step

    • A defined register of roles and responsibilities, along with a defined process for how Agile requirements work is to be done.

    Defining Your Requirements Thresholds

    Where does the BA function fit on an Agile team?

    Team formation is key, as Agile is a team sport

    A business analyst in an Agile team typically interacts with several different roles, including the product owner, development team, and many other stakeholders throughout the organization.

    This is an image the roles who typically interact with a Business Analyst.

    • The product owner, to set the priorities and direction of the project, and to gather requirements and ensure they are being met. Often, but not always, the BA and product owner are the same individual.
    • The development team, to provide clear and concise requirements that they can use to build and test the product.
    • Other stakeholders, such as customers, end-users, and subject matter experts to gather their requirements, feedback and validate the solution.
      • Design, to ensure that the product meets user needs. They may provide feedback and ensure that the design is aligned with requirements.
      • Security, to ensure that the solution meets all necessary security requirements and to identify potential risks and appropriate use of controls.
      • Testing, to ensure that the solution is thoroughly tested before it is deployed. They may create test cases or user scenarios that validate that everything is working as intended.
      • Deployment, to ensure that the necessary preparations have been made, including testing, security, and user acceptance.

    Additionally, during the sprint retrospectives, the team will review their performance and find ways to improve for the next sprint. As a team member, the business analyst helps to identify areas where the team could improve how they are working with requirements and understand how the team can improve communication with stakeholders.

    3.1.1 (Optional) Define Your Agile Requirements RACI

    Estimated Time: 60 Minutes

    1. Identify the project deliverables: The first step is to understand the project deliverables and the tasks that are required to complete them. This will help you to identify the different roles and responsibilities that need to be assigned.
    2. Define the roles and responsibilities: Identify the different roles that will be involved in the project and their associated responsibilities. These roles may include project manager, product owner, development team, stakeholders, and any other relevant parties.
    3. Assign RACI roles: Assign a RACI role to each of the identified tasks. The RACI roles are:
      1. Responsible: the person or team who is responsible for completing the task
      2. Accountable: the person who is accountable for the task being completed on time and to the required standard
      3. Consulted: the people or teams who need to be consulted to ensure the task is completed successfully
      4. Informed: the people or teams who need to be informed of the task's progress and outcome
    4. Create the RACI chart: Use the information gathered in the previous steps to create a matrix or chart that shows the tasks, the roles, and the RACI roles assigned to each task.
    5. Review and refine: Review the RACI chart with the project team and stakeholders to ensure that it accurately reflects the roles and responsibilities of everyone involved. Make any necessary revisions and ensure that all parties understand their roles and responsibilities.
    6. Communicate and implement: Communicate the RACI chart to all relevant parties and ensure that it is used as a reference throughout the project. This will help to ensure that everyone understands their role and that tasks are completed on time and to the required standard.

    Input

    • A list of required tasks and activities
    • A list of stakeholders

    Output

    • A list of defined roles and responsibilities for your project

    Materials

    • Agile Requirements Workbook

    Participants

    • Business Analyst(s)
    • Project Team
    • Sponsor/Executive
    • Relevant Stakeholders

    A Case Study in Team Formation

    Industry: Anonymous Organization in the Energy sector
    Source: Interview

    Challenge

    Agile teams were struggling to deliver within a defined sprint, as there were consistent delays in requirements meeting the definition of ready for development. As such, sprints were often delayed, or key requirements were descoped and deferred to a future sprint.

    During a given two-week sprint cycle, the business analyst assigned to the team would be working along multiple horizons, completing elicitation, analysis, and validation, while concurrently supporting the sprint and dealing with stakeholder changes.

    Solution

    As a part of addressing this ongoing pain, a pilot program was run to add a second business analyst to the team.

    The intent was, as one is engaged preparing requirements through elicitation, analysis, and validation for a future sprint, the second is supporting the current sprint cycle, and gaining insights from stakeholders to refine the requirements backlog.

    Essentially, these two were leap-frogging each other in time. At all times, one BA was focused on the present, and one on the future.

    Result

    A happier team, more satisfied stakeholders, and consistent delivery of features and functions by the Agile teams. The pilot team outperformed all other Agile teams in the organization, and the "2 BA" approach was made the new standard.

    Understanding the Agile requirements process

    Shorter cycles make effective requirements management more necessary, not less

    Short development cycles can make requirements management more difficult because they often result in a higher rate of change to the requirements. In a shorter timeframe, there is less time to gather and verify requirements, leading to a higher likelihood of poor or incomplete requirements. Additionally, there may be more pressure to make decisions quickly, which can lead to less thorough analysis and validation of requirements. This can make it more challenging to ensure that the final solution meets the needs of the stakeholders.
    When planning your requirements cycles, it's important to consider;

    • Your sprint logistics (how long?)
    • Your release plan (at the end of every sprint, monthly, quarterly?)
    • How the backlog will be managed (as tickets, on a visual medium, such as a Kanban board?)
    • How will you manage communication?
    • How will you monitor progress?
    • How will future sprint planning happen?

    Info-Tech's Agile requirements framework

    Sprint N(-1)

    Sprint N

    Sprint N(+1)

    An image of Sprint N(-1) An image of Sprint N An image of Sprint N(+1)

    Changes from waterfall to Agile

    Gathering and documenting requirements: Requirements are discovered and refined throughout the project, rather than being gathered and documented up front. This can be difficult for business analysts who are used to working in a waterfall environment where all requirements are gathered and documented before development begins.
    Prioritization of requirements: Requirements are prioritized based on their value to the customer and the team's ability to deliver them. This can be difficult for business analysts who are used to prioritizing requirements based on the client's needs or their own understanding of what is important.

    Defining acceptance criteria: Acceptance criteria are defined for each user story to ensure that the team understands what needs to be delivered. Business analysts need to understand how to write effective acceptance criteria and how to use them to ensure that the team delivers what the customer needs.
    Supporting Testing and QA: The business analyst plays a role in ensuring that testing (and test cases) are completed and of proper quality, as defined in the requirements.

    Managing changing requirements: It is expected that requirements will change throughout the project. Business analysts need to be able to adapt quickly to changing requirements and ensure that the team is aware of the changes and how they will impact the project.
    Collaboration with stakeholders: Requirements are gathered from a variety of stakeholders, including customers, users, and team members. Business analysts need to be able to work effectively with all stakeholders to gather and refine requirements and ensure that the team is building the right product.

    3.1.2 Define your Agile requirements process

    Estimated time: 60 Minutes

    1. Gather all relevant stakeholders to discuss and define your process for requirements management.
    2. Have a team member facilitate the session to define the process. The sample in the Agile Requirements Workbook can be used optionally as a starting point. You can also use any existing processes and procedures as a baseline.
    3. Gain agreement on the process from all involved stakeholders.
    4. Revisit the process periodically to review its performance and make adjustments as needed.

    NOTE: The process is intended to be at a high enough level to leave space and flexibility for team members to adapt and adjust, but at a sufficient depth that everyone understands the process and workflows. In other words, the process will be both flexible and rigid, and the two are not mutually exclusive.

    Input

    • Project team and RACI
    • Existing Process (if available)

    Output

    • A process for Agile requirements that is flexible yet rigid

    Materials

    • Agile Requirements Workbook

    Participants

    • Business Analyst(s)
    • Project Team
    • Sponsor/Executive
    • Relevant Stakeholders

    Establish the right level of governance and decision-making

    Establishing the right level of governance and decision making is important in Agile requirements because there is a cost to decision making, as time plays an important factor. Even the failure to decide can have significant impacts.

    Good governance and decision-making practices can help to minimize risks, ensure that requirements are well understood and managed, and that project progress is tracked and reported effectively.

    In Agile environments, this often involves establishing clear roles and responsibilities, implementing effective communication and collaboration practices, and ensuring that decision-making processes are efficient and effective.

    Good requirements management practices can help to ensure that projects are aligned with organizational goals and strategy, that stakeholders' needs are understood and addressed, and that deliverables are of high quality and meet the needs of the business.

    By ensuring that governance and decision-making is effective, organizations can improve the chances of project success, and deliver value to the business. Risks and costs can be mitigated by staying small and nimble.

    Check out Make Your IT Governance Adaptable

    Develop an adaptive governance process

    A pyramid, with the number 4 at the apex, and the number 1 at the base.  In order from base-apex, the following titles are found to the right of the pyramid: Ad-Hoc governance; Controlled Governance; Agile Governance; Embedded/Automated governance.

    Maturing governance is a journey

    Organizations should look to progress in their governance stages. Ad-hoc and controlled governance tends to be slow, expensive, and a poor fit for modern practices.

    The goal as you progress through your stages is to delegate governance and empower teams to make optimal decisions in real-time, knowing that they are aligned with the understood best interests of the organization.

    Automate governance for optimal velocity, while mitigating risks and driving value.

    This puts your organization in the best position to be adaptive and able to react effectively to volatility and uncertainty.

    A graph charting Trust and empowerment on the x-axis, and Progress Integration on the Y axis.

    Five key principles for building an adaptive governance framework

    Delegate and empower

    Decision making must be delegated down within the organization, and all resources must be empowered and supported to make effective decisions.

    Define outcomes

    Outcomes and goals must be clearly articulated and understood across the organization to ensure decisions are in line and stay within reasonable boundaries.

    Make risk- informed decisions

    Integrated risk information must be available with sufficient data to support decision making and design approaches at all levels of the organization.

    Embed / automate

    Governance standards and activities need to be embedded in processes and practices. Optimal governance reduces its manual footprint while remaining viable. This also allows for more dynamic adaptation.

    Establish standards and behavior

    Standards and policies need to be defined as the foundation for embedding governance practices organizationally. These guardrails will create boundaries to reinforce delegated decision making.

    Sufficient decision-making power should be given to your Agile teams

    Push the decision-making process down to your pilot teams.

    • Bring your business stakeholders and subject matter experts together to identify the potential high-level risks.
    • Bring your business stakeholders and subject matter experts together to identify the potential high-level risks.
    • Discuss with the business the level of risk they are willing to accept.
    • Define the level of authority project teams have in making critical decisions.

    "Push the decision making down as far as possible, down to the point where sprint teams completely coordinate all the integration, development, and design. What I push up the management chain is risk taking. [Management] decides what level of risk they are willing to take and [they] demonstrate that by the amount of decision making you push down."
    – Senior Manager, Canadian P&C Insurance Company, Info-Tech Interview

    Step 3.2

    Define Your Level of Acceptable Documentation

    Activities

    3.2.1 Calculate the cost of documentation

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Business Analyst(s)
    • Project Team
    • Relevant Stakeholders

    Outcomes of this step

    • Quantified cost of documentation produced for your Agile project.

    Defining Your Requirements Thresholds

    Right-size Your Documentation

    Why do we need it, and what purpose does it serve?

    Before creating any documentation, consider why; why are you creating documentation, and what purpose is it expected to serve?
    Is it:

    • … to gain approval?
    • … to facilitate decision-making?
    • .. to allow the team to think through a challenge or compare solution options?

    Next, consider what level of documentation would be acceptable and 'enough' for your stakeholders. Recognize that 'enough' will depend on your stakeholder's personal definition and perspective.
    There may also be considerations for maintaining documentation for the purposes of compliance, and auditability in some contexts and industries.
    The point is not to eliminate all documentation, but rather, to question why we're producing it, so that we can create just enough to deliver value.

    "What does the next person need to do their work well, to gain or create a shared understanding?"
    - Filip Hendrickx, Innovating BA and Founder, altershape

    Documentation comes at a cost

    We need to quantify the cost of documentation, against the expected benefit

    All things take time, and that would imply that all things have an inherent cost. We often don't think in these terms, as it's just the work we do, and costs are only associated with activities requiring additional capital expenditure. Documentation of requirements can come at a cost in terms of time and resources. Creating and maintaining detailed documentation requires effort from project team members, which could be spent on other aspects of the project such as development or testing. Additionally, there may be costs associated with storing and distributing the documentation.

    When creating documentation, we are making a decision. There is an opportunity cost of investing time to create, and concurrently, not working on other activities. Documentation of requirements can come at a cost in terms of time and resources. Creating and maintaining detailed documentation requires effort from project team members, which could be spent on other aspects of the project such as development or testing. Additionally, there may be costs associated with storing and distributing the documentation.

    In order to make better informed decisions about the types, quantity and even quality of the documentation we are producing, we need to capture that data. To ensure we are receiving good value for our documentation, we should compare the expected costs to the expected benefits of a sprint or project.

    3.2.1 Calculate the cost of documentation

    Estimated time: as needed

    1. Use this tool to quantify the cost of creating and maintaining current state documentation for your Agile requirements team. It provides an indication, via the Documentation Cost Index, of when your project is documenting excessively, relative to the expected benefits of the sprint or project.
    2. In Step 1, enter the hourly rate for the person (or persons) completing the business analysis function for your Agile team. NB: This does not have to be a person with the title of business analyst. If there are multiple people fulfilling this role, enter the average rate (if their rates are same or similar) or a weighted average (if there is a significant range in the hourly rate)
    3. In Step 2, enter the expected benefit (in $) for the sprint or project.
    4. In Step 3, enter the total number of hours spent on each task/activity during the sprint or project. Use blank spaces as needed to add tasks and activities not listed.
    5. In Step 4, you'll find the Documentation Cost Index, which compares your total documentation cost to the expected benefits. The cell will show green when the value is < 0.8, yellow between 0.8 and 1, and red when >1.
    6. Use the information to plan future sprints and documentation needs, identify opportunities for improvement in your requirements practice, and find balance in "just enough" documentation.

    Input

    • Project team and RACI
    • Existing Process (if available)

    Output

    • A process for Agile requirements that is flexible yet rigid

    Materials

    • Agile Requirements Workbook

    Participants

    • Business Analyst(s)
    • Project Team
    • Sponsor/Executive
    • Relevant Stakeholders

    Lack of documentation also comes at a cost

    Lack of documentation can bring costs to Agile projects in a few different ways.

    • Onboarding new team members
    • Improving efficiency
    • Knowledge management
    • Auditing and compliance
    • Project visibility
    • Maintaining code

    Info-Tech Insight

    Re-using deliverables (documentation, process, product, etc.) is important in maintaining the velocity of work. If you find yourself constantly recreating your current state documentation at the start of a project, it's hard to deliver with agility.

    Step 3.3

    Manage Requirements as an Asset

    Activities

    3.3.1 Discuss your current perspectives on requirements as assets

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Business Analyst(s)
    • Project Team
    • Relevant Stakeholders

    Outcomes of this step

    • Awareness of the value in, and tactics for enabling effective management of requirements as assets

    Defining Your Requirements Thresholds

    What do we mean by "assets"?

    And when do requirements become assets?

    In order to delivery with agility, you need to maximize the re-usability of artifacts. These artifacts could take the form of current state documentation, user stories, test cases, and yes, even requirements for re-use.
    Think of it like a library for understanding where your organization is today. Understanding the people, processes, and technology, in one convenient location. These artifacts become assets when we choose to retain them, rather than discard them at the end of a project, when we think they'll no longer be needed.
    And just like finding a single book in a vast library, we need to ensure our assets can be found when we need them. And this means making them searchable.
    We can do this by establishing criteria for requirements and artifact reuse;

    • What business need and benefit is it aligned to?
    • What metadata needs to be attached, related to source, status, subject, author, permissions, type, etc.?
    • Where will it be stored for ease of retrieval?

    Info-Tech Insight

    When writing requirements for products or services, write them for the need first, and not simply for what is changing.

    The benefits of managing requirements as assets

    Retention of knowledge in a knowledge base that allows the team to retain current business requirements, process documentation, business rules, and any other relevant information.
    A clearly defined scope to reduce stakeholder, business, and compliance conflicts.
    Impact analysis of changes to the current organizational assets.

    Source: Requirement Engineering Magazine, 2017.

    A case study in creating an asset repository

    Industry: Anonymous Organization in the Government sector
    Source: Interview

    Challenge

    A large government organization faced a challenge with managing requirements, processes, and project artifacts with any consistency.

    Historically, their documentation was lacking, with multiple versions existing in email sent folders and manila folders no one could find. Confirming the current state at any given time meant the heavy lift of re-documenting and validating, so that effort was avoided for an excessive period.

    Then there was a request for audit and compliance, to review their existing documentation practices. With nothing concrete to show, drastic recommendations were made to ensure this practice would end.

    Solution

    A small but effective team was created to compile and (if not available) document all existing project and product documentation, including processes, requirements, artifacts, business cases, etc.

    A single repository was built and demonstrated to key stakeholders to ensure it would satisfy the needs of the audit and compliance group.

    Result

    A single source of truth for the organization, which was;

    • Accessible (view access to the entire organization).
    • Transparent (anyone could see and understand the process and requirements as intended).
    • A baseline for continuous improvement, as it was clear what the one defined "best way" was.
    • Current, where no one retained current documentation outside of this library.

    3.3.1 Discuss your current perspectives on requirements as assets

    Estimated time: 30 Minutes

    1. Gather all relevant stakeholder to share perspectives on the use of requirements as assets, historically in the organization.
    2. Have a team member facilitate the session. It is optional to document the findings.
    3. After looking at the historical use of requirements as assets, discuss the potential uses, benefits, and drawbacks of managing as assets in the target state.

    Input

    • Participant knowledge and experience

    Output

    • A shared perspective and history on requirements as assets

    Materials

    • A method for data capture (optional)

    Participants

    • Business Analyst(s)
    • Project Team
    • Sponsor/Executive
    • Relevant Stakeholders

    Apply changes to baseline documentation

    Baseline + Release Changes = New Baseline

    • Start from baseline documentation dramatically to reduce cost and risk
    • Treat all scope as changes to baseline requirements
    • Sum of changes in the release scope
    • Sum of changes and original baseline becomes the new baseline
    • May take additional time and effort to maintain accurate baseline

    What is the right tool?

    While an Excel spreadsheet is great to start off, its limitations will become apparent as your product delivery process becomes more complex. Look at these solutions to continue your journey in managing your Agile requirements:

    Step 3.4

    Define Your Requirements Change Management Plan

    Activities

    3.4.1 Triage your requirements

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Business Analyst(s)
    • Project Team
    • Relevant Stakeholders

    Outcomes of this step

    • An approach for determining the appropriate level of governance over changes to requirements.

    Expect and embrace change

    In Agile development, change is expected and embraced. Instead of trying to rigidly follow a plan that may become outdated, Agile teams focus on regularly reassessing their priorities and adapting their plans accordingly. This means that the requirements can change often, and it's important for the team to have a process in place for managing these changes.

    A common approach to managing change in Agile is to use a technique called "backlog refinement." Where previously we populated our backlog with requirements to get them ready for development and deployment, this involves regularly reviewing and updating the list of work to be done. The team will prioritize the items on the evolving backlog, and the prioritized items will be worked on during the next sprint. This allows the team to quickly respond to changes in requirements and stay focused on the most important work.

    Another key aspect of managing change in Agile is effective communication. The team should have regular meetings, such as daily stand-up meetings or weekly sprint planning meetings, to discuss any changes in requirements and ensure that everyone is on the same page.

    Best practices in change and backlog refinement

    Communicate

    Clearly communicate your change process, criteria, and any techniques, tools, and templates that are part of your approach.

    Understand impacts/risks

    Maintain consistent control and communication and ensure that an impact assessment is completed. This is key to managing risks.

    Leverage tools

    Leverage tools when you have them available. This could be a Requirements Management system, a defect/change log, or even by turning on "track changes" in your documents.

    Cross-reference

    For every change, define the source of the change, the reason for the change, key dates for decisions, and any supporting documentation.

    Communicate the reason, and stay on message throughout the change

    Leaders of successful change spend considerable time developing a powerful change message: a compelling narrative that articulates the desired end state and makes the change concrete and meaningful to staff. They create the change vision with staff to build ownership and commitment.

    • The change message should:
    • Explain why the change is needed.
    • Summarize the things that will stay the same.
    • Highlight the things that will be left behind.
    • Emphasize the things that are being changed.
    • Explain how the change will be implemented.
    • Address how the change will affect the various roles in the organization.
    • Discuss staff's role in making the change successful.

    The five elements of communicating the reason for the change:

    An image of a cycle, including the five elements for communicating the reason for change.  these include: What will the role be for each department and individual?; What is the change?; Why are we doing it?; How are we going to go about it?; How long will it take us?

    How to make the management of changes more effective

    Key decisions and considerations

    How will changes to requirements be codified?
    How will intake happen?

    • What is the submission process?
    • Who has approval to submit?
    • What information is needed to submit a request?

    How will potential changes be triaged and evaluated?

    • What criteria will be used to assess the impact and urgency of the potential change?
    • How will you treat material and non-material changes?

    What is the review and approval process?

    • How will acceptance or rejection status be communicated to the submitter?

    3.4.1 Triage Your requirements

    An image of an inverted triangle, with the top being labeled: No Material Impact, the middle being labeled: Material impact; and the bottom being labeled: Governance Impact.  To the right of the image, are text boxes elaborating on each heading.

    If there's no material impact, update and move on

    An image of an inverted triangle, with the top being labeled: No Material Impact, the middle being labeled: Material impact; and the bottom being labeled: Governance Impact. To the right of the image, is a cycle including the following terms: Validate change; Update requirements; Track change (log); Package and communicate

    Material changes require oversight and approval

    An image of an inverted triangle, with the top being labeled: No Material Impact, the middle being labeled: Material impact; and the bottom being labeled: Governance Impact. To the right of the image, is a cycle including the following terms: Define impact; Revise; Change control needed?; Implement change.

    Planning Your Next Steps

    Phase 4

    Planning Your Next Steps

    Phase 1Phase 2Phase 3Phase 4

    1.1 Understand the benefits and limitations of Agile and business analysis

    1.2 Align Agile and business analysis within your organization

    2.1 Confirm the best-fit approach for delivery

    2.2 manage your requirements backlog

    3.1 Define project roles and responsibilities

    3.2 define your level of acceptable documentation

    3.3 Manage requirements as an asset

    3.4 Define your requirements change management plan

    4.1 Preparing new ways of working

    4.2 Develop a roadmap for next steps

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Completing Your Agile Requirements Playbook
    • EXERCISE: Capability Gap List

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • Business Analyst(s)
    • Project Team
    • Sponsor/Executive
    • Relevant Stakeholders

    Managing Requirements in an Agile Environment

    Step 4.1

    Preparing New Ways of Working

    Activities

    4.1.1 Define your communication plan

    Planning Your Next Steps

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Business Analyst(s)
    • Project Team
    • Sponsor/Executive
    • Relevant Stakeholders

    Outcomes of this step

    • Recognize the changes required on the team and within the broader organization, to bring stakeholders on board.

    How we do requirements work will change

    • Team formation and interaction
    • Stakeholder engagement and communication
    • The timing and sequencing of their work
    • Decision-making
    • Documentation
    • Dealing with change

    As a result, you'll need to focus on;

    Emphasizing flexibility: In Agile organizations, there is a greater emphasis on flexibility and the ability to adapt to change. This means that requirements may evolve over time and may not be fully defined at the beginning of the project.
    Enabling continuous delivery: Agile organizations often use continuous delivery methods, which means that new features and functionality are delivered to users on a regular basis. This requires a more iterative approach to requirements management, as new requirements may be identified and prioritized during the delivery process.
    Enhancing collaboration and communication: Agile organizations place a greater emphasis on collaboration and communication between team members, stakeholders, and customers.
    Developing a user-centered approach: Agile organizations often take a user-centered approach to requirements gathering, which means that the needs and goals of the end-user are prioritized.

    Change within the team, and in the broader organization

    How to build an effective blend Agile and requirements management

    Within the team

    • Meetings should happen as needed
    • Handoffs should be clear and concise
    • Interactions should add value
    • Stand-ups should similarly add value, and shouldn't be for status updates

    Within the organization

    • PMO inclusion, to ensure alignment across the organization
    • Business/Operating areas, to recognize what they are committing to for time, resources, etc.
    • Finance, for how your project or product is funded
    • Governance and oversight, to ensure velocity is maintained

    "Whether in an Agile environment or not, collaboration and relationships are still required and important…how you collaborate, communicate, and how you build relationships are key."
    - Paula Bell, CEO, Paula A. Bell Consulting

    Get stakeholders on board with Agile requirements

    1. Stakeholder feedback and management support are key components of successful Agile requirements.
    2. Stakeholders can see a project's progression and provide critical feedback about its success at critical milestones.
    3. Management helps teams succeed by trusting them to complete projects with business value at top of mind and by removing impediments that are inhibiting their productivity.
    4. Agile will bring a new mindset and significant amounts of people, process, and technology changes that stakeholders and management may not be accustomed to. Working through these issues in requirements management enables a smoother rollout.
    5. Management will play a key role in ensuring long-term Agile requirements success and ultimately rolling it out to the rest of the organization.
    6. The value of leadership involvement has not changed even though responsibilities will. The day-to-day involvement in projects will change but continual feedback will ultimately dictate the success or failure of a project.

    4.1.1 Define your communication plan

    Estimated time: 60 Minutes

      1. Gather all relevant stakeholder to create a communication plan for project or product stakeholders.
      2. Have a team member facilitate the session.
      3. Identify
      4. ;
        1. Each stakeholder
        2. The nature of information they are interested in
        3. The channel or medium best to communicate with them
        4. The frequency of communication
      5. (Optional) Consider validating the results with the stakeholders, if not present.
      6. Document the results in the Agile Requirements Workbook and include in Agile Requirements Playbook.
      7. Revisit as needed, whether at the beginning of a new initiative, or over time, to ensure the content is still valid.

    Input

    • Participant knowledge and experience

    Output

    • A plan for communicating with stakeholders

    Materials

    • Agile Requirements Workbook

    Participants

    • Business Analyst(s)
    • Project Team

    Step 4.2

    Develop a Roadmap for Next Steps

    Activities

    4.2.1 Develop your Agile requirements action plan

    4.2.2 Prioritize with now, next, later

    This step involves the following participants:

    • Business Analyst(s)
    • Project Team
    • Sponsor/Executive
    • Relevant Stakeholders

    Outcomes of this step

    • A comprehensive and prioritized list of opportunities and improvements to be made to mature the Agile requirements practice.

    Planning Your Next Steps

    Identify opportunities to improve and close gaps

    Maturing at multiple levels

    With a mindset of continuous improvement, there is always some way we can get better.

    As you mature your Agile requirements practice, recognize that those gaps for improvement can come from multiple levels, from the organizational down to the individual.

    Each level will bring challenges and opportunities.

    The organization

    • Organizational culture
    • Organizational behavior
    • Political will
    • Unsupportive stakeholders

    The team

    • Current ways of working
    • Team standards, norms and values

    The individual

    • Practitioner skills
    • Practitioner experience
    • Level of training received

    Make sure your organization is ready to transition to Agile requirements management

    A cycle is depicted, with the following Terms: Learning; Automation; Integrated teams; Metrics and governance; Culture.

    Learning:

    Agile is a radical change in how people work
    and think. Structured, facilitated learning is required throughout the transformation to
    help leaders and practitioners go from

    doing Agile to being Agile.

    Automation:

    While Agile is tool-agnostic at its roots, Agile work management tools and DevOps inspired SDLC tools that have become a key part of Agile practices.

    Integrated Teams:


    While temporary project teams can get some benefits from Agile, standing, self-organizing teams that cross business, delivery, and operations are essential to gain the full benefits of Agile.

    Metrics and Governance:

    Successful Agile implementations
    require the disciplined use

    of delivery and operations
    metrics that support governance focused on developing better teams.

    Culture:

    Agile teams believe that value is best created by standing, self-organizing cross-functional teams who deliver sustainably in frequent,
    short increments supported by leaders
    who coach them through challenges.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Agile gaps may only have a short-term, perceived benefit. For example, coding without a team mindset can allow for maximum speed to market for a seasoned developer. Post-deployment maintenance initiatives, however, often lock the single developer as no one else understands the rationale for the decisions that were made.

    4.2.1 Develop your Agile requirements action plan

    Estimated time: 60 Minutes

    1. Gather all relevant stakeholder to create a road map and action plan for requirements management.
    2. Have a team member facilitate the session using the results of the Agile Requirements Maturity Assessment.
    3. Identify gaps from current to future state and brainstorm possible actions that can be taken to address those gaps. Resist the urge to analyze or discuss the feasibility of each idea at this stage. The intent is idea generation.
    4. When the group has exhausted all ideas, the facilitator should group like ideas together, with support from participants. Discuss any ideas that are unclear or ambiguous.
    5. Document the results in the Agile Requirements Workbook.

    Note: the feasibility and timing of the ideas will happen in the following "Now, Next, Later" exercise.

    Prioritize your roadmap

    Taking steps to mature your Agile requirements practice.

    An image of the Now; Next; Later technique.

    The "Now, Next, Later" technique is a method for prioritizing and planning improvements or tasks. This involves breaking down a list of tasks or improvements into three categories:

    • "Now" tasks are those that must be completed immediately. These tasks are usually urgent or critical, and they must be completed to keep the project or organization running smoothly.
    • "Next" tasks are those that should be completed soon. These tasks are not as critical as "now" tasks, but they are still important and should be tackled relatively soon.
    • "Later" tasks are those that can be completed later. These tasks are less critical and can be deferred without causing major problems.

    By using this technique, you can prioritize and plan the most important tasks first, while also allowing for flexibility and the ability to adjust plans as necessary.
    This process also helps you get a clear picture on what needs to be done first and what can be done later. This way you can work on the most important things first, and keep track of what you need to do next, for keeping the development/improvement process smooth and efficient.

    Monitor your progress

    Monitoring progress is important in achieving your target state. Be deliberate with your actions, to continue to mature your Agile requirements practice.

    As you navigate toward your target state, continue to monitor your progress, your successes, and your challenges. As your Agile requirements practice matures, you should see improvements in the stated metrics below.

    Establish a cadence to review these metrics, as well as how you are progressing on your roadmap, against the plan.

    This is not about adding work, but rather, about ensuring you're heading in the right direction; finding the balance in your Agile requirements practice.

    Metric
    Team satisfaction (%) Expect team satisfaction to increase as a result of clearer role delineation and value contribution.
    Stakeholder satisfaction (%) Expect stakeholder satisfaction to similarly increase, as requirements quality increases, bringing increased value.
    Requirements rework Measures the quality of requirements from your Agile projects. Expect that the requirements rework will decrease, in terms of volume/frequency.
    Cost of documentation Quantifies the cost of documentation, including elicitation, analysis, validation, presentation, and management.
    Time to delivery Balancing metric. We don't want improvements in other at the expense of time to delivery.

    Appendix

    Research Contributors and Experts

    This is a picture of Emal Bariali

    Emal Bariali
    Business Architect & Business Analyst
    Bariali Consulting

    Emal Bariali is a Senior Business Analyst and Business Architect with 17 years of experience, executing nearly 20 projects. He has experience in both waterfall and Agile methodologies and has delivered solutions in a variety of forms, including custom builds and turnkey projects. He holds a Master's degree in Information Systems from the University of Toronto, a Bachelor's degree in Information Technology from York University, and a post-diploma in Software & Database Development from Seneca College.

    This is a picture of Paula Bell

    Paula Bell
    Paula A. Bell Consulting, LLC

    Paula Bell is the CEO of Paula A Bell Consulting, LLC. She is a Business Analyst, Leadership and Career Development coach, consultant, speaker, and author with 21+ years of experience in corporate America in project roles including business analyst, requirements manager, business initiatives manager, business process quality manager, technical writer, project manager, developer, test lead, and implementation lead. Paula has experience in a variety of industries including media, courts, manufacturing, and financial. Paula has led multiple highly-visible multi-million-dollar technology and business projects to create solutions to transform businesses as either a consultant, senior business analyst, or manager.

    Currently she is Director of Operations for Bridging the Gap, where she oversees the entire operation and their main flagship certification program.

    This is a picture of Ryan Folster

    Ryan Folster
    Consulting Services Manager, Business Analysis
    Dimension Data

    Ryan Folster is a Business Analyst Lead and Product Professional from Johannesburg, South Africa. His strong focus on innovation and his involvement in the business analysis community have seen Ryan develop professionally from a small company, serving a small number of users, to large multi-national organizations. Having merged into business analysis through the business domain, Ryan has developed a firm grounding and provides context to the methodologies applied to clients and projects he is working on. Ryan has gained exposure to the Human Resources, Asset Management, and Financial Services sectors, working on projects that span from Enterprise Line of Business Software to BI and Compliance.

    Ryan is also heavily involved in the local chapter of IIBA®; having previously served as the chapter president, he currently serves as a non-executive board member. Ryan is passionate about the role a Business Analyst plays within an organization and is a firm believer that the role will develop further in the future and become a crucial aspect of any successful business.

    This is a picture of Filip Hendrickx

    Filip Hendrickx
    Innovating BA, Visiting Professor @ VUB
    altershape

    Filip loves bridging business analysis and innovation and mixes both in his work as speaker, trainer, coach, and consultant.

    As co-founder of the BA & Beyond Conference and IIBA Brussels Chapter president, Filip helps support the BA profession and grow the BA community in and around Belgium. For these activities, Filip received the 2022 IIBA® EMEA Region Volunteer of the Year Award.

    Together with Ian Richards, Filip is the author ofBrainy Glue, a business novel on business analysis, innovation and change. Filip is also co-author of the BCS book Digital Product Management and Cycles, a book, method and toolkit enabling faster innovation.

    This is a picture of Fabricio Laguna

    Fabricio Laguna
    Professional Speaker, Consultant, and Trainer
    TheBrazilianBA.com

    Fabrício Laguna, aka The Brazilian BA, is the main reference on business analysis in Brazil. Author and producer of videos, articles, classes, lectures, and playful content, he can explain complex things in a simple and easy-to-understand way. IIBA Brazil Chapter president between 2012-2022. CBAP, AAC, CPOA, PMP, MBA. Consultant and instructor for more than 25 years working with business analysis, methodology, solution development, systems analysis, project management, business architecture, and systems architecture. His online courses are approved by students from 65 countries.

    This is a picture of Ryland Leyton

    Ryland Leyton
    Business Analyst and Agile Coach
    Independent Consultant

    Ryland Leyton, CBAP, PMP, CSM, is an avid Agile advocate and coach, business analyst, author, speaker, and educator. He has worked in the technology sector since 1998, starting off with database and web programming, gradually moving through project management and finding his passion in the BA and Agile fields. He has been a core team member of the IIBA Extension to the BABOK and the IIBA Agile Analysis Certification. Ryland has written popular books on agility, business analysis, and career. He can be reached at www.RylandLeyton.com.

    This is a picture of Steve Jones

    Steve Jones
    Supervisor, Market Support Business Analysis
    ISO New England

    Steve is a passionate analyst and BA manager with more than 20 years of experience in improving processes, services and software, working across all areas of software development lifecycle, business change and business analysis. He rejoices in solving complex business problems and increasing process reproducibility and compliance through the application of business analysis tools and techniques.

    Steve is currently serving as VP of Education for IIBA Hartford. He is a CBAP, certified SAFe Product Owner/Product Manager, Six Sigma Green Belt, and holds an MS in Information Management and Communications.

    This is a picture of Angela Wick

    Angela Wick
    Founder
    BA-Squared and BA-Cube

    Founder of BA-Squared and BA-Cube.com, Angela is passionate about teaching practical, modern product ownership and BA skills. With over 20 years' experience she takes BA skills to the next level and into the future!
    Angela is also a LinkedIn Learning instructor on Agile product ownership and business analysis, an IC-Agile Authorized Trainer, Product Owner and BA highly-rated trainer, highly-rated speaker, sought-after workshop facilitator, and contributor to many industry publications, including:

    • IIBA BABOK v3 Core Team, leading author on the BABOK v3
    • Expert Reviewer, IIBA Agile Extension to the BABOK
    • PMI BA Practice Guide – Expert Reviewer
    • PMI Requirements Management Practice Guide – Expert Reviewer
    • IIBA Competency Model – Lead Author and Team Lead, V1, V2, and V3.

    This is a picture of Rachael Wilterdink

    Rachael Wilterdink
    Principal Consultant
    Infotech Enterprises

    Rachael Wilterdink is a Principal Consultant with Infotech Enterprises. With over 25 years of IT experience, she holds multiple business analysis and Agile certifications. As a consultant, Rachael has served clients in the financial, retail, manufacturing, healthcare, government, non-profit, and insurance industries. Giving back to the professional community, Ms. Wilterdink served on the boards of her local IIBA® and PMI® chapters. As a passionate public speaker, Rachael presents various topics at conferences and user groups across the country and the world. Rachael is also the author of the popular eBook "40 Agile Transformation Pain Points (and how to avoid or manage them)."

    Bibliography

    "2021 Business Agility Report: Rising to the Challenge." Business Agility, 2021. Accessed 13 June 2022.
    Axure. "The Pitfalls of Agile and How We Got Here". Axure. Accessed 14 November 2022.
    Beck, Kent, et al. "Manifesto for Agile Software Development." Agilemanifesto. 2001.
    Brock, Jon, et al. "Large-Scale IT Projects: From Nightmare to Value Creation." BCG, 25 May 2015.
    Bryar, Colin and Bill Carr. "Have We Taken Agile Too Far?" Harvard Business Review, 9 April 2021. Accessed 11 November, 2022.
    Clarke, Thomas. "When Agile Isn't Responsive to Business Goals" RCG Global Services, Accessed 14 November 2022.
    Digital.ai "The 15th State of Agile Report". Digital.ai. Accessed 21 November 2022.
    Hackshall, Robin. "Product Backlog Refinement." Scrum Alliance. 9 Oct. 2014.
    Hartman, Bob. "New to Agile? INVEST in good user stories." Agile For All.
    IAG Consulting. "Business Analysis Benchmark: Full Report." IAG Consulting, 2009.
    Karlsson, Johan. "Backlog Grooming: Must-Know Tips for High-Value Products." Perforce. 18 May 2018
    KPMG. Agile Transformation (2019 Survey on Agility). KPMG. Accessed November 29.
    Laguna, Fabricio "REQM guidance matrix: A framework to drive requirements management", Requirements Engineering Magazine. 12 September 2017. Accessed 10 November 2022.
    Miller, G. J. (2013). Agile problems, challenges, & failures. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2013—North America, New Orleans, LA. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
    Product Management: MoSCoW Prioritization." ProductPlan, n.d. Web.
    Podeswa, Howard "The Business Case for Agile Business Analysis" Requirements Engineering Magazine. 21 February 2017. Accessed 7 November 2022.
    PPM Express. "Why Projects Fail: Business Analysis is the Key". PPM Express. Accessed 16 November 2022.
    Reifer, Donald J. "Quantitative Analysis of Agile Methods Study: Twelve Major Findings." InfoQ, 6 February, 2017.
    Royce, Dr. Winston W. "Managing the Development of Large Software Systems." Scf.usc.edu. 1970. (royce1970.pdf (usc.edu))
    Rubin, Kenneth S. Essential Scrum: A Practical Guide to the Most Popular Agile Process. Pearson Education. 2012.
    Singer, Michael. "15+ Surprising Agile Statistics: Everything You Need To Know About Agile Management". Enterprise Apps Today. 22 August 2022.
    The Standish Group. The Chaos Report, 2015. The Standish Group.

    Where do I go next?

    Improve Requirements Gathering

    Back to basics: great products are built on great requirements.

    Make the Case for Product Delivery

    Align your organization on the practices to deliver what matters most.

    Requirements for Small and Medium Enterprises

    Right-size the guidelines of your requirements gathering process.

    Implement Agile Practices that Work

    Improve collaboration and transparency with the business to minimize project failure.

    Create an Agile-Friendly Gating and Governance Model

    Use Info-Tech's Agile Gating Framework as a guide to gating your Agile projects following a "trust but verify" approach.

    Make Your IT Governance Adaptable

    Governance isn't optional, so keep it simple and make it flexible.

    Deliver on Your Digital Product Vision

    Build a product vision your organization can take from strategy through execution.

    Master the MSA for Your Managed Services Providers

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}235|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.7/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $9,869 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 4 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Vendor Management
    • Parent Category Link: /vendor-management
    • Master Services Agreements and Service Level Agreements are tedious, and reviewers may lack the skills and experience to effectively complete the process.
    • Managed services providers have a repository of contract terms and conditions that are road-tested and prepackaged, and which are often biased in their favor.
    • With many different pricing options, it is difficult to choose the services you need.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Manage your managed services providers. Added value is realized when managed service providers are in tune with your IT strategies, goals, and mission.
    • Negotiate an agreement that is beneficial to both parties. The most successful partnerships are a win-win agreement.
    • Lawyers can’t ensure you get the best business deal. They tend to look at general terms and conditions and may overlook IT-specific components.

    Impact and Result

    • Understanding managed services providers, including their roles and pricing models, will give you valuable insight into negotiating the best deal for your organization.
    • Info-Tech’s contract review methodology will help you navigate the complex process of managed services provider contract evaluation and review all the key details to maximize the benefits to your organization.
    • This blueprint provides guidance on catching vendor-biased terms and conditions, and suggests tips for getting managed services providers to take on their fair share of responsibilities.

    Master the MSA for Your Managed Services Providers Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should master the MSA for your MSPs, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Review terms and conditions for your MSP contract

    Use Info-Tech’s MSA Contract Review Tool to locate and track improvement areas in your MSAs.

    • Master the MSA for Your Managed Services Providers – Phase 1: Review Terms and Conditions of Your MSP Contract
    • MSA Contract Review Tool
    [infographic]

    Recruit and Retain People of Color in IT

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}546|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.7/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $19,184 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 21 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Engage
    • Parent Category Link: /engage
    • Organizations have been trying to promote equality for many years. Diversity and inclusion strategies and a myriad of programs have been implemented in companies across the world. Despite the attempts, many organizations still struggle to ensure that their workforce is representative of the populations they support or want to support.
    • IT brings another twist. Many IT companies and departments are based on the culture of white males, and underrepresented ethnic communities find it more of a challenge to fit in.
    • This sometimes means that talented minorities are less incentivized to join or stay in technology.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Diversity and inclusion cannot be a one-time campaign or a one-off initiative.
    • For real change to happen, every leader needs to internalize the value of creating and retaining diverse teams.

    Impact and Result

    • To stay competitive, IT leaders need to be more involved and commit to a plan to recruit and retain people of color in their departments and organizations. A diverse team is an answer to innovation that can differentiate your company.
    • Treat recruiting and retaining a diverse team as a business challenge that requires full engagement. Info-Tech offers a targeted solution that will help IT leaders build a plan to attract, recruit, engage, and retain people of color.

    Recruit and Retain People of Color in IT Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should recruit and retain people of color in your IT department or organization, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the ways we can support you in this endeavor.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Recruit people of color in IT

    Diverse teams are necessary to foster creativity and guide business strategies. Overcome limitations by recruiting people of color and creating a diverse workforce.

    • Recruit and Retain People of Color in IT – Phase 1: Recruit People of Color in IT
    • Support Plan
    • IT Behavioral Interview Question Library

    2. Retain people of color in IT

    Underrepresented employees benefit from an expansive culture. Create an inclusive environment and retain people of color and promote value within your organization.

    • Recruit and Retain People of Color in IT – Phase 2: Retain People of Color in IT

    Infographic

    Workshop: Recruit and Retain People of Color in IT

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Setting the Stage

    The Purpose

    Introduce challenges and concerns around recruiting and retaining people of color.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Gain a sense of direction.

    Activities

    1.1 Introduction to diversity conversations.

    1.2 Assess areas to focus on and determine what is right, wrong, missing, and confusing.

    1.3 Obtain feedback from your team about the benefits of working at your organization.

    1.4 Establish your employee value proposition (EVP).

    1.5 Discuss and establish your recruitment goals.

    Outputs

    Current State Analysis

    Right, Wrong, Missing, Confusing Quadrant

    Draft EVP

    Recruitment Goals

    2 Refine Your Recruitment Process

    The Purpose

    Identify areas in your current recruitment process that are preventing you from hiring people of color.

    Establish a plan to make improvements.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Optimized recruitment process

    Activities

    2.1 Brainstorm and research community partners.

    2.2 Review current job descriptions and equity statement.

    2.3 Update job description template and equity statement.

    2.4 Set team structure for interview and assessment.

    2.5 Identify decision-making structure.

    Outputs

    List of community partners

    Updated job description template

    Updated equity statement

    Interview and assessment structure

    Behavioral Question Library

    3 Culture and Management

    The Purpose

    Create a plan for an inclusive culture where your managers are supported.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Awareness of how to better support employees of color.

    Activities

    3.1 Discuss engagement and belonging.

    3.2 Augment your onboarding materials.

    3.3 Create an inclusive culture plan.

    3.4 Determine how to support your management team.

    Outputs

    List of onboarding content

    Inclusive culture plan

    Management support plan

    4 Close the Loop

    The Purpose

    Establish mechanisms to gain feedback from your employees and act on them.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Finalize the plan to create your diverse and inclusive workforce.

    Activities

    4.1 Ask and listen: determine what to ask your employees.

    4.2 Create your roadmap.

    4.3 Wrap-up and next steps.

    Outputs

    List of survey questions

    Roadmap

    Completed support plan

    Develop and Deploy Security Policies

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}256|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.5/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $19,953 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 19 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Governance, Risk & Compliance
    • Parent Category Link: /governance-risk-compliance
    • Employees are not paying attention to policies. Awareness and understanding of what the security policy’s purpose is, how it benefits the organization, and the importance of compliance are overlooked when policies are distributed.
    • Informal, un-rationalized, ad hoc policies do not explicitly outline responsibilities, are rarely comprehensive, and are difficult to implement, revise, and maintain.
    • Data breaches are still on the rise and security policies are not shaping good employee behavior or security-conscious practices.
    • Adhering to security policies is rarely a priority to users as compliance often feels like an interference to daily workflow. For a lot of organizations, security policies are not having the desired effect.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Creating good policies is only half the solution. Having a great policy management lifecycle will keep your policies current, effective, and compliant.
    • Policies must be reasonable, auditable, enforceable, and measurable. If the policy items don’t meet these requirements, users can’t be expected to adhere to them. Focus on developing policies to be quantified and qualified for them to be relevant.

    Impact and Result

    • Save time and money using the templates provided to create your own customized security policies mapped to the Info-Tech framework, which incorporates multiple industry best-practice frameworks (NIST, ISO, SOC2SEC, CIS, PCI, HIPAA).

    Develop and Deploy Security Policies Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Develop and Deploy Security Policies Deck – A step-by-step guide to help you build, implement, and assess your security policy program.

    Our systematic approach will ensure that all identified areas of security have an associated policy.

  • Develop the security policy program.
  • Develop and implement the policy suite.
  • Communicate the security policy program.
  • Measure the security policy program.
    • Develop and Deploy Security Policies – Phases 1-4

    2. Security Policy Prioritization Tool – A structured tool to help your organization prioritize your policy suite to ensure that you are addressing the most important policies first.

    The Security Policy Prioritization Tool assesses the policy suite on policy importance, ease to implement, and ease to enforce. The output of this tool is your prioritized list of policies based on our policy framework.

    • Security Policy Prioritization Tool

    3. Security Policy Assessment Tool – A structured tool to assess the effectiveness of policies within your organization and determine recommended actions for remediation.

    The Security Policy Assessment Tool assesses the policy suite on policy coverage, communication, adherence, alignment, and overlap. The output of this tool is a checklist of remediation actions for each individual policy.

    • Security Policy Assessment Tool

    4. Security Policy Lifecycle Template – A customizable lifecycle template to manage your security policy initiatives.

    The Lifecycle Template includes sections on security vision, security mission, strategic security and policy objectives, policy design, roles and responsibilities for developing security policies, and organizational responsibilities.

    • Security Policy Lifecycle Template

    5. Policy Suite Templates – A best-of-breed templates suite mapped to the Info-Tech framework you can customize to reflect your organizational requirements and acquire approval.

    Use Info-Tech's security policy templates, which incorporate multiple industry best-practice frameworks (NIST, ISO, SOC2SEC, CIS, PCI, HIPAA), to ensure that your policies are clear, concise, and consistent.

    • Acceptable Use of Technology Policy Template
    • Application Security Policy Template
    • Asset Management Policy Template
    • Backup and Recovery Policy Template
    • Cloud Security Policy Template
    • Compliance and Audit Management Policy Template
    • Data Security Policy Template
    • Endpoint Security Policy Template
    • Human Resource Security Policy Template
    • Identity and Access Management Policy Template
    • Information Security Policy Template
    • Network and Communications Security Policy Template
    • Physical and Environmental Security Policy Template
    • Security Awareness and Training Policy Template
    • Security Incident Management Policy Template
    • Security Risk Management Policy Template
    • Security Threat Detection Policy Template
    • System Configuration and Change Management Policy Template
    • Vulnerability Management Policy Template

    6. Policy Communication Plan Template – A template to help you plan your approach for publishing and communicating your policy updates across the entire organization.

    This template helps you consider the budget time for communications, identify all stakeholders, and avoid scheduling communications in competition with one another.

    • Policy Communication Plan Template

    7. Security Awareness and Training Program Development Tool – A tool to help you identify initiatives to develop your security awareness and training program.

    Use this tool to first identify the initiatives that can grow your program, then as a roadmap tool for tracking progress of completion for those initiatives.

    • Security Awareness and Training Program Development Tool

    Infographic

    Workshop: Develop and Deploy Security Policies

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Define the Security Policy Program

    The Purpose

    Define the security policy development program.

    Formalize a governing security policy lifecycle.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Understanding the current state of policies within your organization.

    Prioritizing list of security policies for your organization.

    Being able to defend policies written based on business requirements and overarching security needs.

    Leveraging an executive champion to help policy adoption across the organization.

    Formalizing the roles, responsibilities, and overall mission of the program.

    Activities

    1.1 Understand the current state of policies.

    1.2 Align your security policies to the Info-Tech framework for compliance.

    1.3 Understand the relationship between policies and other documents.

    1.4 Prioritize the development of security policies.

    1.5 Discuss strategies to leverage stakeholder support.

    1.6 Plan to communicate with all stakeholders.

    1.7 Develop the security policy lifecycle.

    Outputs

    Security Policy Prioritization Tool

    Security Policy Prioritization Tool

    Security Policy Lifecycle Template

    2 Develop the Security Policy Suite

    The Purpose

    Develop a comprehensive suite of security policies that are relevant to the needs of the organization.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Time, effort, and money saved by developing formally documented security policies with input from Info-Tech’s subject-matter experts.

    Activities

    2.1 Discuss the risks and drivers your organization faces that must be addressed by policies.

    2.2 Develop and customize security policies.

    2.3 Develop a plan to gather feedback from users.

    2.4 Discuss a plan to submit policies for approval.

    Outputs

    Understanding of the risks and drivers that will influence policy development.

    Up to 14 customized security policies (dependent on need and time).

    3 Implement Security Policy Program

    The Purpose

    Ensure policies and requirements are communicated with end users, along with steps to comply with the new security policies.

    Improve compliance and accountability with security policies.

    Plan for regular review and maintenance of the security policy program.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    Streamlined communication of the policies to users.

    Improved end user compliance with policy guidelines and be better prepared for audits.

    Incorporate security policies into daily schedule, eliminating disturbances to productivity and efficiency.

    Activities

    3.1 Plan the communication strategy of new policies.

    3.2 Discuss myPolicies to automate management and implementation.

    3.3 Incorporate policies and processes into your security awareness and training program.

    3.4 Assess the effectiveness of security policies.

    3.5 Understand the need for regular review and update.

    Outputs

    Policy Communication Plan Template

    Understanding of how myPolicies can help policy management and implementation.

    Security Awareness and Training Program Development Tool

    Security Policy Assessment Tool

    Action plan to regularly review and update the policies.

    Further reading

    Develop and Deploy Security Policies

    Enhance your overall security posture with a defensible and prescriptive policy suite.

    Analyst Perspective

    A policy lifecycle can be the secret sauce to managing your policies.

    A policy for policy’s sake is useless if it isn’t being used to ensure proper processes are followed. A policy should exist for more than just checking a requirement box. Policies need to be quantified, qualified, and enforced for them to be relevant.

    Policies should be developed based on the use cases that enable the business to run securely and smoothly. Ensure they are aligned with the corporate culture. Rather than introducing hindrances to daily operations, policies should reflect security practices that support business goals and protection.

    No published framework is going to be a perfect fit for any organization, so take the time to compare business operations and culture with security requirements to determine which ones apply to keep your organization secure.

    Photo of Danny Hammond, Research Analyst, Security, Risk, Privacy & Compliance Practice, Info-Tech Research Group. Danny Hammond
    Research Analyst
    Security, Risk, Privacy & Compliance Practice
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge
    • Security breaches are damaging and costly. Trying to prevent and respond to them without robust, enforceable policies makes a difficult situation even harder to handle.
    • Informal, un-rationalized, ad hoc policies are ineffective because they do not explicitly outline responsibilities and compliance requirements, and they are rarely comprehensive.
    • Without a strong lifecycle to keep policies up to date and easy to use, end users will ignore or work around poorly understood policies.
    • Time and money is wasted dealing with preventable security issues that should be pre-emptively addressed in a comprehensive corporate security policy program.
    Common Obstacles

    InfoSec leaders will struggle to craft the right set of policies without knowing what the organization actually needs, such as:

    • The security policies needed to safeguard infrastructure and resources.
    • The scope the security policies will cover within the organization.
    • The current compliance and regulatory obligations based on location and industry.
    InfoSec leaders must understand the business environment and end-user needs before they can select security policies that fit.
    Info-Tech’s Approach

    Info-Tech’s Develop and Deploy Security Policies takes a multi-faceted approach to the problem that incorporates foundational technical elements, compliance considerations, and supporting processes:

    • Assess what security policies currently exist within the organization and consider additional secure policies.
    • Develop a policy lifecycle that will define the needs, develop required documentation, and implement, communicate, and measure your policy program.
    • Draft a set of security policies mapped to the Info-Tech framework, which incorporates multiple industry best-practice frameworks (NIST, ISO, SOC2SEC, CIS, PCI, HIPAA).

    Info-Tech Insight

    Creating good policies is only half the solution. Having a great policy management lifecycle will keep your policies current, effective, and compliant.

    Your Challenge

    This research is designed to help organizations design a program to develop and deploy security policies

    • A security policy is a formal document that outlines the required behavior and security controls in place to protect corporate assets.
    • The development of policy documents is an ambitious task, but the real challenge comes with communication and enforcement.
    • A good security policy allows employees to know what is required of them and allows management to monitor and audit security practices against a standard policy.
    • Unless the policies are effectively communicated, enforced, and updated, employees won’t know what’s required of them and will not comply with essential standards, making the policies powerless.
    • Without a good policy lifecycle in place, it can be challenging to illustrate the key steps and decisions involved in creating and managing a policy.

    The problem with security policies

    29% Of IT workers say it's just too hard and time consuming to track and enforce.

    25% Of IT workers say they don’t enforce security policies universally.

    20% Of workers don’t follow company security policies all the time.

    (Source: Security Magazine, 2020)

    Common obstacles

    The problem with security policies isn’t development; rather, it’s the communication, enforcement, and maintenance of them.

    • Employees are not paying attention to policies. Awareness and understanding of what the security policy’s purpose is, how it benefits the organization, and the importance of compliance are overlooked when policies are distributed.
    • Informal, un-rationalized, ad hoc policies do not explicitly outline responsibilities, are rarely comprehensive, and are difficult to implement, revise, and maintain.
    • Date breaches are still on the rise and security policies are not shaping good employee behavior or security-conscious practices.
    • Adhering to security policies is rarely a priority to users as compliance often feels like an interference to daily workflow. For a lot of organizations, security policies are not having the desired effect.
    Bar chart of the 'Average cost of a data breach' in years '2019-20', '20-21', and '21-22'.
    (Source: IBM, 2022 Cost of a Data Breach; n=537)

    Reaching an all-time high, the cost of a data breach averaged US$4.35 million in 2022. This figure represents a 2.6% increase from last year, when the average cost of a breach was US$4.24 million. The average cost has climbed 12.7% since 2020.

    Info-Tech’s approach

    The right policy for the right audience. Generate a roadmap to guide the order of policy development based on organizational policy requirements and the target audience.

    Actions

    1. Develop policy lifecycle
    2. Identify compliance requirements
    3. Understand which policies need to be developed, maintained, or decommissioned
    I. Define Security Policy Program

    a) Security policy program lifecycle template

    b) Policy prioritization tool
    Clockwise cycle arrows at the centre of the table. II. Develop & Implement Policy Suite

    a) Policy template set

    Policies must be reasonable, auditable, enforceable, and measurable. Policy items that meet these requirements will have a higher level of adherence. Focus on efficiently creating policies using pre-developed templates that are mapped to multiple compliance frameworks.

    Actions

    1. Differentiate between policies, procedures, standards, and guidelines
    2. Draft policies from templates
    3. Review policies, including completeness
    4. Approve policies
    Gaining feedback on policy compliance is important for updates and adaptation, where necessary, as well as monitoring policy alignment to business objectives.

    Actions

    1. Enforce policies
    2. Measure policy effectiveness
    IV. Measure Policy Program

    a) Security policy tracking tool

    III. Communicate Policy Program

    a) Security policy awareness & training tool

    b) Policy communication plan template
    Awareness and training on security policies should be targeted and must be relevant to the employees’ jobs. Employees will be more attentive and willing to incorporate what they learn if they feel that awareness and training material was specifically designed to help them.

    Actions

    1. Identify any changes in the regulatory and compliance environment
    2. Include policy awareness in awareness and training programs
    3. Disseminate policies
    Build trust in your policy program by involving stakeholder participation through the entire policy lifecycle.

    Blueprint benefits

    IT/InfoSec Benefits

    • Reduces complexity within the policy creation process by using a single framework to align multiple compliance regimes.
    • Introduces a roadmap to clearly educate employees on the do’s and don’ts of IT usage within the organization.
    • Reduces costs and efforts related to managing IT security and other IT-related threats.

    Business Benefits

    • Identifies and develops security policies that are essential to your organization’s objectives.
    • Integrates security into corporate culture while maximizing compliance and effectiveness of security policies.
    • Reduces security policy compliance risk.

    Key deliverable:

    Security Policy Templates

    Templates for policies that can be used to map policy statements to multiple compliance frameworks.

    Sample of Security Policy Templates.

    Blueprint deliverables

    Each step of this blueprint is accompanied by supporting deliverables to help you accomplish your goals:

    Security Policy Prioritization Tool

    The Info-Tech Security Policy Prioritization Tool will help you determine which security policies to work on first.
    Sample of the Security Policy Prioritization Tool.
    Sample of the Security Policy Assessment Tool.

    Security Policy Assessment Tool

    Info-Tech's Security Policy Assessment Tool helps ensure that your policies provide adequate coverage for your organization's security requirements.

    Measure the value of this blueprint

    Phase

    Purpose

    Measured Value

    Define Security Policy Program Understand the value in formal security policies and determine which policies to prepare to update, eliminate, or add to your current suite. Time, value, and resources saved with guidance and templates:
    1 FTE*3 days*$80,000/year = $1,152
    Time, value, and resources saved using our recommendations and tools:
    1 FTE*2 days*$80,000/year = $768
    Develop and Implement the Policy Suite Select from an extensive policy template offering and customize the policies you need to optimize or add to your own policy program. Time, value, and resources saved using our templates:
    1 consultant*15 days*$150/hour = $21,600 (if starting from scratch)
    Communicate Security Policy Program Use Info-Tech’s methodology and best practices to ensure proper communication, training, and awareness. Time, value, and resources saved using our training and awareness resources:
    1 FTE*1.5 days*$80,000/year = $408
    Measure Security Policy Program Use Info-Tech’s custom toolkits for continuous tracking and review of your policy suite. Time, value, and resources saved by using our enforcement recommendations:
    2 FTEs*5 days*$160,000/year combined = $3,840
    Time, value, and resources saved by using our recommendations rather than an external consultant:
    1 consultant*5 days*$150/hour = $7,200

    After each Info-Tech experience, we ask our members to quantify the real-time savings, monetary impact, and project improvements our research helped them achieve.

    Overall Impact

    9.5 /10

    Overall Average $ Saved

    $29,015

    Overall Average Days Saved

    25

    Info-Tech offers various levels of support to best suit your needs

    DIY Toolkit

    Guided Implementation

    Workshop

    Consulting

    "Our team has already made this critical project a priority, and we have the time and capability, but some guidance along the way would be helpful." "Our team knows that we need to fix a process, but we need assistance to determine where to focus. Some check-ins along the way would help keep us on track." "We need to hit the ground running and get this project kicked off immediately. Our team has the ability to take this over once we get a framework and strategy in place." "Our team does not have the time or the knowledge to take this project on. We need assistance through the entirety of this project."

    Diagnostics and consistent frameworks used throughout all four options

    Guided Implementation

    A Guided Implementation (GI) is series of calls with an Info-Tech analyst to help implement our best practices in your organization.

    A typical GI is six to ten calls over the course of two to four months.

    What does a typical GI on this topic look like?

    Phase 1

    Phase 2

    Phase 3

    Phase 4

    Call #1: Scope security policy requirements, objectives, and any specific challenges.

    Call #2: Review policy lifecycle; prioritize policy development.

    Call #3: Customize the policy templates.

    Call #4: Gather feedback on policies and get approval.

    Call #5: Communicate the security policy program.

    Call #6: Develop policy training and awareness programs.

    Call #7: Track policies and exceptions.

    Workshop Overview

    Contact your account representative for more information.
    workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8889
    Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5
    Define the security policy program
    Develop the security policy suite
    Develop the security policy suite
    Implement security policy program
    Finalize deliverables and next steps
    Activities

    1.1 Understand the current state of policies.

    1.2 Align your security policies to the Info-Tech framework for compliance.

    1.3 Understand the relationship between policies and other documents.

    1.4 Prioritize the development of security policies.

    1.5 Discuss strategies to leverage stakeholder support.

    1.6 Plan to communicate with all stakeholders.

    1.7 Develop the security policy lifecycle.

    2.1 Discuss the risks and drivers your organization faces that must be addressed by policies.

    2.2 Develop and customize security policies.

    2.1 Discuss the risks and drivers your organization faces that must be addressed by policies (continued).

    2.2 Develop and customize security policies (continued).

    2.3 Develop a plan to gather feedback from users.

    2.4 Discuss a plan to submit policies for approval.

    3.1 Plan the communication strategy for new policies.

    3.2 Discuss myPolicies to automate management and implementation.

    3.3 Incorporate policies into your security awareness and training program.

    3.4 Assess the effectiveness of policies.

    3.5 Understand the need for regular review and update.

    4.1 Review customized lifecycle and policy templates.

    4.2 Discuss the plan for policy roll out.

    4.3 Schedule follow-up Guided Implementation calls.

    Deliverables
    1. Security Policy Prioritization Tool
    2. Security Policy Lifecycle
    1. Security Policies (approx. 9)
    1. Security Policies (approx. 9)
    1. Policy Communication Plan
    2. Security Awareness and Training Program Development Tool
    3. Security Policy Assessment Tool
    1. All deliverables finalized

    Develop and Deploy Security Policies

    Phase 1

    Define the Security Policy Program

    Phase 1

    1.1 Understand the current state

    1.2 Align your security policies to the Info-Tech framework

    1.3 Document your policy hierarchy

    1.4 Prioritize development of security policies

    1.5 Leverage stakeholders

    1.6 Develop the policy lifecycle

    Phase 2

    2.1 Customize policy templates

    2.2 Gather feedback from users on policy feasibility

    2.3 Submit policies to upper management for approval

    Phase 3

    3.1 Understand the need for communicating policies

    3.2 Use myPolicies to automate the management of your security policies

    3.3 Design, build, and implement your communications plan

    3.4 Incorporate policies and processes into your training and awareness programs

    Phase 4

    4.1 Assess the state of security policies

    4.2 Identify triggers for regular policy review and update

    4.3 Develop an action plan to update policies

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Understand the current state of your organization’s security policies.
    • Align your security policies to the Info-Tech framework for compliance.
    • Prioritize the development of your security policies.
    • Leverage key stakeholders to champion the policy initiative.
    • Inform all relevant stakeholders of the upcoming policy program.
    • Develop the security policy lifecycle.

    1.1 Understand the current state of policies

    Scenario 1: You have existing policies

    1. Use the Security Policy Prioritization Tool to identify any gaps between the policies you already have and those recommended based on your changing business needs.
    2. As your organization undergoes changes, be sure to incorporate new requirements in the existing policies.
    3. Sometimes, you may have more specific procedures for a domain’s individual security aspects instead of high-level policies.
    4. Group current policies into the domains and use the policy templates to create overarching policies where there are none and improve upon existing high-level policies.

    Scenario 2: You are starting from scratch

    1. To get started on new policies, use the Security Policy Prioritization Tool to identify the policies Info-Tech recommends based on your business needs. See the full list of templates in the Appendix to ensure that all relevant topics are addressed.
    2. Whether you’re starting from scratch or have incomplete/ad hoc policies, use Info-Tech’s policy templates to formalize and standardize security requirements for end users.
    Info-Tech Insight

    Policies are living, evolving documents that require regular review and update, so even if you have policies already written, you’re not done with them.

    1.2 Align your security policies to the Info-Tech framework for compliance

    You have an opportunity to improve your employee alignment and satisfaction, improve organizational agility, and obtain high policy adherence. This is achieved by translating your corporate culture into a policy-based compliance culture.

    Align your security policies to the Info-Tech Security Framework by using Info-Tech’s policy templates.

    Info-Tech’s security framework uses a best-of-breed approach to leverage and align with most major security standards, including:
    • ISO 27001/27002
    • COBIT
    • Center for Internet Security (CIS) Critical Controls
    • NIST Cybersecurity Framework
    • NIST SP 800-53
    • NIST SP 800-171

    Info-Tech Security Framework

    Info-Tech Security Framework with policies grouped into categories which are then grouped into 'Governance' and 'Management'.

    1.3 Document your policy hierarchy

    Structuring policy components at different levels allows for efficient changes and direct communication depending on what information is needed.

    Policy hierarchy pyramid with 'Security Policy Lifecycle' on top, then 'Security Policies', then 'IT and/or Supporting Documentation'.

    Defines the cycle for the security policy program and what must be done but not how to do it. Aligns the business, security program, and policies.
    Addresses the “what,” “who,” “when,” and “where.”

    Defines high-level overarching concepts of security within the organization, including the scope, purpose, and objectives of policies.
    Addresses the high-level “what” and “why.”
    Changes when business objectives change.

    Defines enterprise/technology – specific, detailed guidelines on how to adhere to policies.
    Addresses the “how.”
    Changes when technology and processes change.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Design separate policies for different areas of focus. Policies that are written as single, monolithic documents are resistant to change. A hierarchical top-level document supported by subordinate policies and/or procedures can be more rapidly revised as circumstances change.

    1.3.1 Understand the relationship between policies and other documents

    Policy:
    • Provides emphasis and sets direction.
    • Standards, guidelines, and procedures must be developed to support an overarching policy.
    Arrows stemming from the above list, connecting to the three lists below.

    Standard:

    • Specifies uniform method of support for policy.
    • Compliance is mandatory.
    • Includes process, frameworks, methodologies, and technology.
    Two-way horizontal arrow.

    Procedure:

    • Step-by-step instructions to perform desired actions.
    Two-way horizontal arrow.

    Guideline:

    Recommended actions to consider in absence of an applicable standard, to support a policy.
    This model is adapted from a framework developed by CISA (Certified Information Systems Auditor).

    Supporting Documentation

    Considerations for standards

    Standards. These support policies by being much more specific and outlining key steps or processes that are necessary to meet certain requirements within a policy document. Ideally standards should be based on policy statements with a target of detailing the requirements that show how the organization will implement developed policies.

    If policies describe what needs to happen, then standards explain how it will happen.

    A good example is an email policy that states that emails must be encrypted; this policy can be supported by a standard such as Transport Layer Security (TLS) encryption that specifically ensures that all email communication is encrypted for messages “in transit” from one secure email server that has TLS enabled to another.

    There are numerous security standards available that support security policies/programs based on the kind of systems and controls that an organization would like to put in place. A good selection of supporting standards can go a long way to further protect users, data, and other organizational assets
    Key Policies Example Associated Standards
    Access Control Policy
    • Password Management User Standard
    • Account Auditing Standard
    Data Security Policy
    • Cryptography Standard
    • Data Classification Standard
    • Data Handling Standard
    • Data Retention Standard
    Incident Response Policy
    • Incident Response Plan
    Network Security Policy
    • Wireless Connectivity Standard
    • Firewall Configuration Standard
    • Network Monitoring Standard
    Vendor Management Policy
    • Vendor Risk Management Standard
    • Third-Party Access Control Standard
    Application Security Policy
    • Application Security Standard

    1.4 Prioritize development of security policies

    The Info-Tech Security Policy Prioritization Tool will help you determine which security policies to work on first.
    • The tool allows you to prioritize your policies based on:
      • Importance: How relevant is this policy to organizational security?
      • Ease to implement: What is the effort, time, and resources required to write, review, approve, and distribute the policy?
      • Ease to enforce: How much effort, time, and resources are required to enforce the policy?
    • Additionally, the weighting or priority of each variable of prioritization can be adjusted.

    Align policies to recent security concerns. If your organization has recently experienced a breach, it may be crucial to highlight corresponding policies as immediately necessary.

    Info-Tech Insight

    If you have an existing policy that aligns with one of the Info-Tech recommended templates weight Ease to Implement and Ease to Enforce as HIGH (4-5). This will decrease the priority of these policies.

    Sample of the Security Policy Prioritization Tool.

    Download the Security Policy Prioritization Tool

    1.5 Leverage stakeholders to champion policies

    Info-Tech Insight

    While management support is essential to initiating a strong security posture, allow employees to provide input on the development of security policies. This cooperation will lead to easier incorporation of the policies into the daily routines of workers, with less resistance. The security team will be less of a police force and more of a partner.

    Executive champion

    Identify an executive champion who will ensure that the security program and the security policies are supported.

    Focus on risk and protection

    Security can be viewed as an interference, but the business is likely more responsive to the concepts of risk and protection because it can apply to overall business operations and a revenue-generating mandate.

    Communicate policy initiatives

    Inform stakeholders of the policy initiative as security policies are only effective if they support the business requirements and user input is crucial for developing a strong security culture.

    Current security landscape

    Leveraging the current security landscape can be a useful mechanism to drive policy buy-in from stakeholders.

    Management buy-in

    This is key to policy acceptance; it indicates that policies are accurate, align with the business, and are to be upheld, that funds will be made available, and that all employees will be equally accountable.

    Secure Your Hybrid Workforce

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}271|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Secure Cloud & Network Architecture
    • Parent Category Link: /secure-cloud-network-architecture
    • Many IT and security leaders struggle to cope with the challenges associated with an hybrid workforce and how best to secure it.
    • Understanding the main principles of zero trust: never trust, always verify, assume breach, and verify explicitly.
    • How to go about achieving a zero trust framework.
    • Understanding the premise of SASE as it pertains to a hybrid workforce.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    Securing your hybrid workforce should be an opportunity to get started on the zero trust journey. Realizing the core features needed to achieve this will assist you determine which of the options is a good fit for your organization.

    Impact and Result

    Every organization's strategy to secure their hybrid workforce should include introducing zero trust principles in certain areas. Our unique approach:

    • Assess the suitability of SASE/SSE and zero trust.
    • Present capabilities and feature benefits.
    • Procure SASE product and/or build a zero trust roadmap.

    Secure Your Hybrid Workforce Research & Tools

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Secure Your Hybrid Workforce Deck – The purpose of the storyboard is to provide a detailed description of the steps involved in securing your hybrid workforce with zero trust.

    The storyboard contains two easy-to-follow steps on securing your hybrid workforce with zero trust, from assessing the suitability of SASE/SSE to taking a step in building a zero trust roadmap.

    • Secure Your Hybrid Workforce – Phases 1-2

    2. Suitability Assessment Tool – A tool to identify whether SASE/SSE or a zero trust roadmap is a better fit for your organization.

    Use this tool to identify your next line of action in securing your hybrid workforce by assessing key components that conforms to the ideals and principles of Zero Trust.

    • Zero Trust - SASE Suitability Assessment Tool

    3. RFP Template – A document to guide you through requesting proposals from vendors.

    Use this document to request proposals from select vendors.

    • Request for Proposal (RFP) Template
    [infographic]

    Further reading

    Secure Your Hybrid Workforce

    SASE as a driver to zero trust.

    Analyst Perspective

    Consolidate your security and network.

    Remote connections like VPNs were not designed to be security tools or to have the capacity to handle a large hybrid workforce; hence, organizations are burdened with implementing controls that are perceived to be "security solutions." The COVID-19 pandemic forced a wave of remote work for employees that were not taken into consideration for most VPN implementations, and as a result, the understanding of the traditional network perimeter as we always knew it has shifted to include devices, applications, edges, and the internet. Additionally, remote work is here to stay as recruiting talent in the current market means you must make yourself attractive to potential hires.

    The shift in the network perimeter increases the risks associated with traditional VPN solutions as well as exposing the limitations of the solution. This is where zero trust as a principle introduces a more security-focused strategy that not only mitigates most (if not all) of the risks, but also eliminates limitations, which would enhance the business and improve customer/employee experience.

    There are several ways of achieving zero trust maturity, and one of those is SASE, which consolidates security and networking to better secure your hybrid workforce as implied trust is thrown out of the window and verification of everything becomes the new normal to defend the business.

    This is a picture of Victor Okorie

    Victor Okorie
    Senior Research Analyst, Security and Privacy
    Info-Tech Research Group

    Executive Summary

    Your Challenge

    CISOs are looking to zero trust to fill the gaps associated with their traditional remote setup as well as to build an adaptable security strategy. Some challenges faced include:

    • Understanding the main principles of zero trust: never trust, always verify, assume breach, and verify explicitly.
    • Understanding how to achieve a zero trust framework.
    • Understanding the premise of SASE as it pertains to a hybrid workforce.

    Common Obstacles

    The zero trust journey may seem tedious because of a few obstacles like:

    • Knowing what the principle is all about and the components that align with it.
    • Knowing where to start. Due to the lack of a standardized path for the zero trust journey, going about the journey can be confusing.
    • Not having a uniform definition of what makes up a SASE solution as it is heavily dependent on vendors.

    Info-Tech's Approach

    Info-Tech provides a three-service approach to helping organizations better secure their hybrid workforce.

    • Understand your current, existing technological capabilities and challenges with your hybrid infrastructure, and prioritize those challenges.
    • Gain insight into zero trust and SASE as a mitigation/control/tool to those challenges.
    • Identify the SASE features that are relevant to your needs and a source guide for a SASE vendor.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Securing your hybrid workforce should be an opportunity to get started on the zero trust journey. Realizing the core features needed to achieve this will assist you in determining which of the options is a good fit for your organization.

    Turn your challenges into opportunities

    Hybrid workforce is the new normal

    The pandemic has shown there is no going back to full on-prem work, and as such, security should be looked at differently with various considerations in mind.

    Understand that current hybrid solutions are susceptible to various forms of attack as the threat attack surface area has now expanded with users, devices, applications, locations, and data. The traditional perimeter as we know it has expanded beyond just the corporate network, and as such, it needs a more mature security strategy.

    Onboarding and offboarding have been done remotely, and with some growth recorded, the size of companies has also increased, leading to a scaling issue.

    Employees are now demanding remote work capabilities as part of contract negotiation before accepting a job.

    Attacks have increased far more quickly during the pandemic, and all indications point to them increasing even more.

    Scarce available security personnel in the job market for hire.

    Reality Today

    This image is a circle graph and 67% of it is coloured with the number 67% in the middle of the graph

    The number of breach incidents by identity theft.
    Source: Security Magazine, 2022.

    This image is a circle graph and 78% of it is coloured with the number 78% in the middle of the graph

    IT security teams want to adopt zero trust.
    Source: Cybersecurity Insiders, 2019.

    Reduce the risks of remote work by using zero trust

    $1.07m

    $1.76m

    235

    Increase in breaches related to remote work

    Cost difference in a breach where zero trust is deployed

    Days to identify a breach

    The average cost of a data breach where remote work was a factor rose by $1.07 million in 2021. COVID-19 brought about rapid changes in organizations, and digital transformation changes curbed some of its excesses. Organizations that did not make any digital transformation changes reported a $750,000 higher costs compared to global average.

    The average cost of a breach in an organization with no zero trust deployed was $5.04 million in 2021 compared to the average cost of a breach in an organization with zero trust deployed of $3.28 million. With a difference of $1.76 million, zero trust makes a significant difference.

    Organizations with a remote work adoption rate of 50% took 235 days to identify a breach and 81 days to contain that breach – this is in comparison to the average of 212 days to identify a breach and 75 days to contain that breach.

    Source: IBM, 2021.

    Network + Security = SASE

    What exactly is a SASE product?

    The convergence and consolidation of security and network brought about the formation of secure access service edge (SASE – pronounced like "sassy"). Digital transformation, hybrid workforce, high demand of availability, uninterrupted access for employees, and a host of other factors influenced the need for this convergence that is delivered as a cloud service.

    The capabilities of a SASE solution being delivered are based on certain criteria, such as the identity of the entity (users, devices, applications, data, services, location), real-time context, continuous assessment and verification of risk and "trust" throughout the lifetime of a session, and the security and compliance policies of the organization.

    SASE continuously identifies users and devices, applies security based on policy, and provides secure access to the appropriate and requested application or data regardless of location.

    image contains a list of the SASE Network Features and Security Features. the network Features are: WAN optimization; SD WAN; CDN; Network-as-a-service. The Security Features are: CASB; IDPS; ZTNA/VPN; FWaaS; Browser isolation; DLP; UEBA; Secure web gateway; Sandboxing

    Current Approach

    The traditional perimeter security using the castle and moat approach is depicted in the image here. The security shields valuable resources from external attack; however, it isn't foolproof for all kinds of external attacks. Furthermore, it does not protect those valuable resources from insider threat.

    This security perimeter also allows for lateral movement when it has been breached. Access to these resources is now considered "trusted" solely because it is now behind the wall/perimeter.

    This approach is no longer feasible in our world today where both external and internal threats pose continuous risk and need to be contained.

    Determine the suitability of SASE and zero trust

    The Challenge:

    Complications facing traditional infrastructure

    • Increased hybrid workforce
    • Regulatory compliance
    • Limited Infosec personnel
    • Poor threat detection
    • Increased attack surface

    Common vulnerabilities in traditional infrastructure

    • MITM attack
    • XSS attack
    • Session hijacking
    • Trust-based model
    • IP spoofing
    • Brute force attack
    • Distributed denial of service
    • DNS hijacking
    • Latency issues
    • Lateral movement once connection is established

    TRADITIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE

    NETWORK

    SECURITY

    AUTHENTICATION

    IDENTITY

    ACCESS

    • MPLS
    • Corporate Network
    • Antivirus installed
    • Traditional Firewall
    • Intrusion Detection and Prevention System
    • Allow and Deny rules
    • Businesses must respond to consumer requests to:
    • LDAP
    • AAA
    • Immature password complexity
    • Trusted device with improperly managed endpoint protection.
    • Little or no DNS security
    • Web portal (captive)
    • VPN client

    Candidate Solutions

    Proposed benefits of SASE

    • Access is only granted to the requested resource
    • Consolidated network and security as a service
    • Micro-segmentation on application and gateway
    • Adopts a zero trust security posture for all access
    • Managed detection and response
    • Uniform enforcement of policy
    • Distributed denial of service shield

    SASE

    NETWORK

    SECURITY

    AUTHENTICATION

    IDENTITY

    ACCESS

    • Software defined – WAN
    • Content delivery network
    • WAN optimization
    • Network-as-a-service
    • Firewall-as-a-service/NGFW
    • Zero trust network access
    • Endpoint detection & response
    • Secure web gateway
    • Cloud access security broker
    • Data loss prevention
    • Remote browser isolation
    • Multifactor authentication
    • Context-based security policy for authentication
    • Authorization managed with situational awareness and real-time risk analytics
    • Continuous verification throughout an access request lifecycle
    • Zero trust identity on users, devices, applications, and data.
    • Strong password complexity enforced
    • Privilege access management
    • Secure internet access
    • SASE client

    ZERO TRUST

    TENETS OF ZERO TRUST

    ZERO TRUST PILLARS

    • Continuous, dynamic authentication and verification
    • Principle of least privilege
    • Always assume a breach
    • Implement the tenets of zero trust across the following domains of your environment:
      • IDENTITY
      • APPLICATION
      • NETWORK
      • DEVICES
      • DATA

    Proposed benefits of zero trust

    • Identify and protect critical and non-critical resources in accordance with business objectives.
    • Produce initiatives that conform to the ideals of zero trust and are aligned with the corresponding pillars above.
    • Formulate policies to protect resources and aid segmentation.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Securing your hybrid workforce should be an opportunity to get started on the zero trust journey. Realizing the core features needed to achieve this will help you determine which of the options is a good fit for your organization.

    Measure the value of using Info-Tech's approach

    IT and business value

    PHASE 1

    PHASE 2

    Assess the benefits of adopting SASE or zero trust

    Vendors will try to control the narrative in terms of what they can do for you, but it's time for you to control the narrative and identify pain points to IT and the business, and with that, to understand and define what the vendor solution can do for you.

    PHASE 2

    Assess the benefits of adopting SASE or zero trust

    Vendors will try to control the narrative in terms of what they can do for you, but it's time for you to control the narrative and identify pain points to IT and the business, and with that, to understand and define what the vendor solution can do for you.

    Short-term benefits

    • Gain awareness of your zero trust readiness.
    • Embed a zero trust mindset across your architecture.
    • Control the narrative of what SASE brings to your organization.

    Long-term benefits

    • Identified controls to mitigate risks with current architecture while on a zero trust journey.
    • Improved security posture that reduces risk by increasing visibility into threats and user connections.
    • Reduced CapEx and OpEx due to the scalability, low staffing requirements, and improved time to respond to threats using a SASE or SSE solution.

    Determine SASE cost factors

    IT and business value

    Info-Tech Insight

    IT leaders need to examine different areas of their budget and determine how the adoption of a SASE solution could influence several areas of their budget breakdown.

    Determining the SASE cost factors early could accelerate the justification the business needs to move forward in making an informed decision.

    01- Infrastructure

    • Physical security
    • Cabling
    • Power supply and HVAC
    • Hosting

    02- Administration

    • Human hours to analyze logs and threats
    • Human hours to secure infrastructure
    • Fees associated with maintenance

    03- Inbound

    • DPI
    • DDoS
    • Web application firewall
    • VPN concentrators

    04- Outbound

    • IDPS
    • DLP on-prem
    • QoS
    • Sandbox & URL filtering

    04- Data Protection

    • Real-time URL
      insights
    • Threat hunting
    • Data loss prevention

    06- Monitoring

    • Log storage
    • Logging engine
    • Dashboards
    • Managed detection
      and response

    Info-Tech's methodology for securing your hybrid workforce

    1. Current state and future mitigation

    2. Assess the benefits of moving to SASE/zero trust

    Phase Steps

    1.1 Limitations of legacy infrastructure

    1.2 Zero trust principle as a control

    1.3 SASE as a driver of zero trust

    2.1 Sourcing out a SASE/SSE vendor

    2.2 Build a zero trust roadmap

    Phase Outcomes

    Identify and prioritize risks of current infrastructure and several ways to mitigate them.

    RFP template and build a zero trust roadmap.

    Consider several factors needed to protect your growing hybrid workforce and assess your current resource capabilities, solutions, and desire for a more mature security program. The outcome should either address a quick pain point or a long-term roadmap.

    The internet is the new corporate network

    The internet is the new corporate network, which opens the organization up to more risks not protected by the current security stack. Using Info-Tech's methodology of zero trust adoption is a sure way to reduce the attack surface, and SASE is one useful tool to take you on the zero trust journey.

    Current-state risks and future mitigation

    Securing your hybrid workforce via zero trust will inevitably include (but is not limited to) technological products/solutions.

    SASE and SSE features sit as an overlay here as technological solutions that will help on the zero trust journey by aggregating all the disparate solutions required for you to meet zero trust requirements into a single interface. The knowledge and implementation of this helps put things into perspective of where and what our target state is.

    The right solution for the right problem

    It is critical to choose a solution that addresses the security problems you are actually trying to solve.

    Don't allow the solution provider to tell you what you need – rather, start by understanding your capability gaps and then go to market to find the right partner.

    Take advantage of the RFP template to source a SASE or SSE vendor. Additionally, build a zero trust roadmap to develop and strategize initiatives and tasks.

    Blueprint deliverables

    Each step of this blueprint is accompanied by supporting deliverables to help you accomplish your goals:

    Zero Trust and SASE Suitability Tool
    Identify critical and vulnerable DAAS elements to protect and align them to business goals.

    Zero Trust Program Gap Analysis Tool
    Perform a gap analysis between current and target states to build a zero trust roadmap.

    Key deliverable:

    Secure Your Hybrid Workforce With Zero Trust Communication deck
    Present your zero trust strategy in a prepopulated document that summarizes the work you have completed as a part of this blueprint.

    Phase 1

    Current state and future mitigation

    Phase 1

    Phase 2

    1.1 Limitations of legacy infrastructure

    1.2 Zero trust principle as a control

    1.3 SASE as a driver of zero trust

    2.1 Sourcing out a SASE/SSE vendor

    2.2 Build a zero trust roadmap

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Introduction to the tool, how to use the input tabs to identify current challenges, technologies being used, and to prioritize the challenges. The prioritized list will highlight existing gaps and eventually be mapped to recommended mitigations in the following phase.

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • CIO
    • CISO
    • CSO
    • IT security team
    • IT network team

    Secure Your Hybrid Workforce

    1.1 Limitations of legacy infrastructure

    Traditional security & remote access solutions must be modernized

    Info-Tech Insight
    Traditional security is architected with a perimeter in mind and is poorly suited to the threats in hybrid or distributed environments.

    Ensure you minimize or eliminate weak points on all layers.

    • SECURITY
      • DDoS
      • DNS hijacking
      • Weak VPN protocols
    • IDENTITY
      • One-time verification allowing lateral movement
    • NETWORK
      • Risk perimeter stops at corporate network edge
      • Split tunneling
    • AUTHENTICATION
      • Weak authentication
      • Weak passwords
    • ACCESS
      • Man-in-the-middle attack
      • Cross-site scripting
      • Session hijacking

    1.1.1 For example: traditional VPNs are poorly suited to a hybrid workforce

    There are many limitations that make it difficult for traditional VPNs to adapt to an ever-growing hybrid workforce.

    The listed limitations are tied to associated risks of legacy infrastructure as well as security components that are almost non-existent in a VPN implementation today.

    Scaling

    VPNs were designed for small-scale remote access to corporate network. An increase in the remote workforce will require expensive hardware investment.

    Visibility

    Users and attackers are not restricted to specific network resources, and with an absence of activity logs, they can go undetected.

    Managed detection & response

    Due to the reduction in or lack of visibility, threat detections are poorly managed, and responses are already too late.

    Hardware

    Limited number of locations for VPN hardware to be situated as it can be expensive.

    Hybrid workforce

    The increase in the hybrid workforce requires the risk perimeter to be expanded from the corporate network to devices and applications. VPNs are built for privacy, not security.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Hybrid workforces are here to stay, and adopting a strategy that is adaptable, flexible, simple, and cost-effective is a recommended road to take on the journey to bettering your security and network.

    1.1 Identify risk from legacy infrastructure

    Estimated Time: 1-2 hours

    1. Ensure all vulnerabilities described on slide 17 are removed.
    2. Note any forecasted challenge you think you might have down the line with your current hybrid setup.
    3. Identify any trend that may be of interest to you with regards to your hybrid setup.

    This is a screenshot of the organizational profile table found in the Zero Trust - SASE Suitability Assessment Tool

    Download the Zero Trust - SASE Suitability Assessment Tool

    Input

    • List of key pain points and challenges
    • List of forecasted challenges and trends of interest

    Output

    • Prioritized list of pain points and/or challenges

    Materials

    • Excel tool
    • Whiteboard

    Participants

    • CISO
    • InfoSec team
    • IT manager
    • CIO
    • Infrastructure team

    1.2 Zero trust principle as a control

    A zero trust implementation comes with benefits/initiatives that mitigate the challenges identified in earlier activities.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Zero trust/"always verify" is applied to identity, workloads, devices, networks, and data to provide a greater control for risks associated with traditional network architecture.

    Improve IAM maturity

    Zero trust identity and access will lead to a mature IAM process in an organization with the removal of implicit trust.

    Secure your remote access

    With a zero trust network architecture (ZTNA), both the remote and on-prem network access are more secure than the traditional network deployment. The software-defined parameter ensures security on each network access.

    Reduce threat surface area

    With zero trust principle applied on identity, workload, devices, network, and data, the threat surface area which births some of the risks identified earlier will be significantly reduced.

    Improve hybrid workforce

    Scaling, visibility, network throughput, secure connection from anywhere, micro-segmentation, and a host of other benefits to improve your hybrid workforce.

    1.2 SASE as an overlay to zero trust

    Security and network initiatives of a zero trust roadmap converged into a single pane of glass.

    Info-Tech Insight

    Security and network converged into a single pane of glass giving you some of the benefits and initiatives of a zero trust implemented architecture in one package.

    Improve IAM maturity

    The identity-centric nature of SASE solutions helps to improve your IAM maturity as it applies the principle of least privilege. The removal of implicit trust and continuous verification helps foster this more.

    Secure your remote access

    With ZTNA, both the remote and on-prem network access are more secure than the traditional network deployment. The software defined parameter ensures security on each network access.

    Reduce threat surface area

    Secure web gateway, cloud access security broker, domain name system, next-generation firewall, data loss prevention, and ZTNA protect against data leaks, prevent lateral movement, and prevent malicious actors from coming in.

    Improve hybrid workforce

    Reduced costs and complexity of IT, faster user experience, and reduced risk as a result of the scalability, visibility, ease of IT administration, network throughput, secure connection from anywhere, micro-segmentation, and a host of other benefits will surely improve your hybrid workforce.

    Align SASE features to zero trust core capabilities

    Verify Identity

    • Authentication & verification are enforced for each app request or session.
    • Use of multifactor authentication.
    • RBAC/ABAC and principle of least privilege are applied on the identity regardless of user, device, or location.

    Verify Device

    • Device health is checked to ensure device is not compromised or vulnerable.
    • No admin permissions on user devices.
    • Device-based risk assessment is enforced as part of UEBA.

    Verify Access

    • Micro-segmentation built around network, user, device, location and roles.
    • Use of context and content-based policy enforced to the user, application, and device identity.
    • Network access only granted to specified application request and not to the entire network.

    Verify Services

    • Applications and services are checked before access is granted.
    • Connections to the application and services are inspected with the security controls built into the SASE solution.

    Info-Tech Insight

    These features of SASE and zero trust mitigate the risks associated with a traditional VPN and reduce the threat surface area. With security at the core, network optimization is not compromised.

    Security components of SASE

    Otherwise known as security service edge (SSE)

    Security service edge is the convergence of all security services typically found in SASE. At its core, SSE consists of three services which include:

    • Secure web gateway – secure access to the internet and web.
    • Cloud access security broker – secure access to SaaS and cloud applications.
    • Zero trust network access – secure remote access to private applications.

    SSE components are also mitigations or initiatives that make up a zero trust roadmap as they comply with the zero trust principle, and as a result, they sit up there with SASE as an overlay/driver of a zero trust implementation. SSE's benefits are identical to SASE's in that it provides zero trust access, risk reduction, low costs and complexity, and a better user experience. The difference is SSE's sole focus on security services and not the network component.

    SASE

    NETWORK FEATURES

    SECURITY FEATURES

    • WAN optimization
    • SD WAN
    • CDN
    • Network-as-a-service
    • CASB
    • IDPS
    • ZTNA/VPN
    • FWaaS
    • Browser isolation
    • DLP
    • UEBA
    • Secure web gateway
    • Sandboxing

    1.3 Pros & cons of zero trust and SASE

    Zero Trust

    SASE

    Pros

    Cons

    Pros

    Cons

    • Robust IAM process and technologies with role-based access control.
    • Strong and continuous verification of identity of user accounts, devices, data, location, and principle of least privilege applied.
    • Micro-segmentation applied around users, network, devices, roles, and applications to prevent lateral movement.
    • Threat attack surface eliminated, which reduces organizational risks.
    • Protection of data strengthened based on sensitivity and micro-segmentation.
    • Difficult to identify the scope of the zero trust initiative.
    • Requires continuous and ongoing update of access controls.
    • Zero trust journey/process could take years and is prone to being abandoned without commitment from executives.
    • Legacy systems can be hard to replace, which would require all stakeholders to prioritize resource allocation.
    • Can be expensive to implement.
    • Adopts a zero trust security posture for all access requests.
    • Converged and consolidated network and security delivered as a cloud service to the user rather than a single point of enforcement.
    • Centralized visibility of devices, data in transit and at rest, user activities, and threats.
    • Cheaper than a zero trust roadmap implementation.
    • Managed detection and response.
    • The limited knowledge of SASE.
    • No universally agreed upon SASE definition.
    • SASE products are still being developed and are open to vendors' interpretation.
    • Existing vendor relationships could be a hinderance to deployment.
    • Hard to manage MSSPs.

    Understand SASE and zero trust suitability for your needs

    Estimated Time: 1 hour

    Use the dashboard to understand the value assessment of adopting a SASE product or building a zero trust roadmap.

    This is an image of the SASE Suitability Assessment

    This is the image of the Zero Trust Suitability Assessment

    Info-Tech Insight

    This tool will help steer you on a path to take as a form of mitigation/control to some or all the identified challenges.

    Phase 2

    Make a decision and next steps

    Phase 1

    Phase 2

    1.1 Limitations of legacy infrastructure

    1.2 Zero trust principle as a control

    1.3 SASE as a driver of zero trust

    2.1 Sourcing out a SASE/SSE vendor

    2.2 Build a zero trust roadmap

    This phase will walk you through the following activities:

    • Introduction to the tool activity, how to use the input tabs and considerations to generate an output that could help understand the current state of your hybrid infrastructure and what direction is to be followed next to improve.

    This phase involves the following participants:

    • CIO
    • CISO
    • CSO
    • IT security
    • IT network team

    Secure Your Hybrid Workforce

    Step 2.1

    Sourcing out a SASE/SSE vendor

    Activities

    2.1.1 Use the RFP template to request proposal from vendors

    2.1.2 Use SoftwareReviews to compare vendors

    This step involves the following participants:

    • CIO, CISO, IT manager, Infosec team, executives.

    Outcomes of this step

    • Zero Trust Roadmap

    2.1.1 Use the RFP template to request proposal from vendors

    Estimated Time: 1-3 hours

    1. As a group, use the RFP Template to include technical capabilities of your desired SASE product and to request proposals from vendors.
    2. The features that are most important to your organization generated from phase one should be highlighted in the RFP.

    Input

    • List of SASE features
    • Technical capabilities

    Output

    • RFP

    Materials

    • RFP Template

    Participants

    • Security team
    • IT leadership

    Download the RFP Template

    2.1.2 Use SoftwareReviews to compare vendors

    SoftwareReviews

    • The Data Quadrant is a thorough evaluation and ranking of all software in an individual category to compare platforms across multiple dimensions.
    • Vendors are ranked by their Composite Score, based on individual feature evaluations, user satisfaction rankings, vendor capability comparisons, and likeliness to recommend the platform.
    • The Emotional Footprint is a powerful indicator of overall user sentiment toward the relationship with the vendor, capturing data across five dimensions.
    • Vendors are ranked by their Customer Experience (CX) Score, which combines the overall Emotional Footprint rating with a measure of the value delivered by the solution.

    Step 2.2

    Zero trust readiness and roadmap

    Activities

    2.2.1 Assess the maturity of your current zero trust implementation

    2.2.2 Understand business needs and current security projects

    2.2.3 Set target maturity state with timeframe

    This step involves the following participants:

    CIO, CISO, IT manager, Infosec team, executives.

    Outcomes of this step

    Zero Trust Roadmap

    2.2.1 Assess the maturity of your current zero trust implementation

    Estimated Time: 1-3 hours

    • Realizing that zero trust is a journey helps create a better roadmap and implementation. Identify the current controls or solutions in your organization that align with the principle of zero trust.
    • Break down these controls or solutions into different silos (e.g. identity, security, network, data, device, applications, etc.).
    • Determine your zero trust readiness.

    Input

    • List of zero trust controls/solutions
    • Siloed list of zero trust controls/solutions
    • Current state of zero trust maturity

    Output

    • Zero trust readiness and current maturity state

    Materials

    • Zero Trust Security Benefit Assessment tool

    Participants

    • Security team
    • IT leadership

    Download the Zero Trust Security Benefit Assessment tool

    2.2.2 Understand business needs and current security projects

    Estimated Time: 1-3 hours

    1. Identify the business and IT executives, application owners, and board members whose vision aligns with the zero trust journey.
    2. Identify existing projects within security, IT, and the business and highlight interdependencies or how they fit with the zero trust journey.
    3. Build a rough sketch of the roadmap that fits the business needs, current projects and the zero trust journey.

    Input

    • Meetings with stakeholders
    • List of current and future projects

    Output

    • Sketch of zero trust roadmap

    Materials

    • Whiteboard activity

    Participants

    • Security team
    • IT leadership
    • IT ops team
    • Business executives
    • Board members

    Download Zero Trust Protect Surface Mapping Tool

    2.2.3 Set target maturity state with a given timeframe

    Estimated Time: 1-3 hours

    1. With the zero trust readiness, current business, IT and security projects, current maturity state, and sketch of the roadmap, setting a target maturity state within some timeframe is at the top of the list. The target maturity state will include a list of initiatives that could be siloed and confined to a timeframe.
    2. A Gantt chart or graph could be used to complete this task.

    Input

    • Results from previous activity slides

    Output

    • Current state and target state assessment for gap analysis
    • List of initiatives and timeframe

    Materials

    • Zero Trust Program Gap Analysis Tool

    Participants

    • Security team
    • IT leadership
    • IT ops team
    • Business executives
    • Board members

    Download the Zero Trust Program Gap Analysis Tool

    Summary of Accomplishment

    Insights Gained

    • Difference between zero trust as a principle and SASE as a framework
    • Difference between SASE and SSE platforms.
    • Assessment of which path to take in securing your hybrid workforce

    Deliverables Completed

    If you would like additional support, have our analysts guide you through other phases as part of an Info-Tech workshop

    Contact your account representative for more information

    workshops@infotech.com

    1-888-670-8889

    Additional Support

    If you would like additional support, have our analysts guide you through other phases as part of an Info-Tech workshop

    To accelerate this project, engage your IT team in an Info-Tech workshop with an Info-Tech analyst team.

    Info-Tech analysts will join you and your team at your location or welcome you to Info-Tech's historic Toronto office to participate in an innovative onsite workshop.

    Contact your account representative for more information.
    workshops@infotech.com 1-888-670-8889

    The following are sample activities that will be conducted by Info-Tech analysts with your team:

    This is a screenshot from the Zero Trust - SASE Suitability Assessment Tool

    Zero Trust - SASE Suitability Assessment Tool

    Assess current security capabilities and build a roadmap of tasks and initiatives that close maturity gaps.

    Research Contributors

    • Aaron Shum, Vice President, Security & Privacy
    • Cameron Smith, Research Lead, Security & Privacy
    • Brad Mateski, Zones, Solutions Architect for CyberSecurity
    • Bob Smock, Info-Tech Research Group, Vice President of Consulting
    • Dr. Chase Cunningham, Ericom Software, Chief Strategy Officer
    • John Kindervag, ON2IT Cybersecurity, Senior Vice President, Cybersecurity Strategy and ON2IT Group Fellow
    • John Zhao, Fonterra, Enterprise Security Architect
    • Rongxing Lu, University of New Brunswick, Associate Professor
    • Sumanta Sarkar, University of Warwick, Assistant Professor
    • Tim Malone, J.B. Hunt Transport, Senior Director Information Security
    • Vana Matte, J.B. Hunt Transport, Senior Vice President of Technology Services

    Related Info-Tech Research

    This is a screenshot from Info-Tech's Security Strategy Model

    Build an Information Security Strategy

    Info-Tech has developed a highly effective approach to building an information security strategy – an approach that has been successfully tested and refined for over seven years with hundreds of organizations. This unique approach includes tools for ensuring alignment with business objectives, assessing organizational risk and stakeholder expectations, enabling a comprehensive current state assessment, prioritizing initiatives, and building out a security roadmap.

    This is a screenshot from Info-Tech's research: Determine Your Zero Trust Readiness

    Determine Your Zero Trust Readiness

    IT security was typified by perimeter security. However, the way the world does business has mandated a change to IT security. In response, zero trust is a set of principles that can add flexibility to planning your IT security strategy.

    Use this blueprint to determine your zero trust readiness and understand how zero trust can benefit both security and the business.

    This is a screenshot from Info-Tech's research: Mature Your Identity and Access Management Program

    Mature Your Identity and Access Management Program

    Many organizations are looking to improve their identity and access management (IAM) practices but struggle with where to start and whether all areas of IAM have been considered. This blueprint will help you improve the organization's IAM practices by following our three-phase methodology:

    • Assess identity and access requirements.
    • Identify initiatives using the identity lifecycle.
    • Prioritize initiatives and build a roadmap.

    Bibliography

    "2021 Data Breach Investigations Report." Verizon, 2021. Web.
    "Fortinet Brings Networking and Security to the Cloud" Fortinet, 2 Mar. 2021. Web.
    "A Zero Trust Strategy Has 3 Needs – Identify, Authenticate, and Monitor Users and Devices on and off the Network." Fortinet, 15 July 2021. Web.
    "Applying Zero Trust Principles to Enterprise Mobility." CISA, Mar. 2022. Web.
    "CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model." CISA, Cybersecurity Division, June 2021. Web.
    "Continuous Diagnostics and Mitigation Program Overview." CISA, Jan. 2022. Web.
    "Cost of a Data Breach Report 2021 | IBM." IBM, July 2021. Web.
    English, Melanie. "5 Stats That Show The Cost Saving Effect of Zero Trust." Teramind, 29 Sept. 2021. Web.
    Hunter, Steve. "The Five Business Benefits of a Zero Trust Approach to Security." Security Brief - Australia, 19 Aug. 2020. Web.
    "Improve Application Access and Security With Fortinet Zero Trust Network Access." Fortinet, 2 Mar. 2021. Web.
    "Incorporating zero trust Strategies for Secure Network and Application Access." Fortinet, 21 Jul. 2021. Web.
    Jakkal, Vasu. "Zero Trust Adoption Report: How Does Your Organization Compare?" Microsoft, 28 July 2021. Web.
    "Jericho Forum™ Commandments." The Open Group, Jericho Forum, May 2007. Web.
    Schulze, Holger. "2019 Zero Trust Adoption Report." Cybersecurity Insiders, 2019. Web.
    "67% of Organizations Had Identity-Related Data Breaches Last Year." Security Magazine, 22 Aug. 2022. Web.
    United States, Executive Office of the President Joseph R. Biden, Jr. "Executive Order on Improving the Nation's Cybersecurity." The White House, 12 May 2021. Web.

    Grow Your Own PPM Solution

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}436|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.6/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $47,944 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 29 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Portfolio Management
    • Parent Category Link: /portfolio-management
    • As portfolio manager, you’re responsible for supporting the intake of new project requests, providing visibility into the portfolio of in-flight projects, and helping to facilitate the right approval and prioritization decisions.
    • You need a project portfolio management (PPM) tool that promotes the maintenance and flow of good data to help you succeed in these tasks. However, while throwing expensive technology at bad process rarely works, many organizations take this approach to solve their PPM problems.
    • Commercial PPM solutions are powerful and compelling, but they are also expensive, complex, and hard to use. When a solution is not properly adopted, the data can be unreliable and inconsistent, defeating the point of purchasing a tool in the first place.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Your choice of PPM solution must be in tune with your organizational PPM maturity to ensure that you are prepared to sustain the tool use without having the corresponding PPM processes collapse under its own weight.
    • A spreadsheet-based homegrown PPM solution can provide key capabilities of an optimized PPM solution with a high level of sophistication and complexity without the prohibitive capital and labor costs demanded by commercial PPM solution.
    • Focus on your PPM decision makers that will consume the reports and insights by investigating their specific reporting needs.

    Impact and Result

    • Think outside the commercial box. Develop an affordable, adoptable, and effective PPM solution using widely available tools based on Info-Tech’s ready-to-deploy templates.
    • Make your solution sustainable. When it comes to portfolio management, high level is better. A tool that is accurate and maintainable will provide more value than one that strives for precise data yet is ultimately unmaintainable.
    • Report success. A PPM tool needs to foster portfolio visibility in order to engage and inform the executive layer and support effective decision making.

    Grow Your Own PPM Solution Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should grow your own PPM solution, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Right-size your PPM solution

    Scope an affordable, adoptable, and effective PPM solution with Info-Tech's Portfolio Manager 2017 workbook.

    • Grow Your Own PPM Solution – Phase 1: Right-Size Your PPM Solution
    • Portfolio Manager 2017 Cost-in-Use Estimation Tool
    • None

    2. Get to know Portfolio Manager 2017

    Learn how to use Info-Tech's Portfolio Manager 2017 workbook and create powerful reports.

    • Grow Your Own PPM Solution – Phase 2: Meet Portfolio Manager 2017
    • Portfolio Manager 2017
    • Portfolio Manager 2017 (with Actuals)
    • None
    • None
    • None

    3. Implement your homegrown PPM solution

    Plan and implement an affordable, adoptable, and effective PPM solution with Info-Tech's Portfolio Manager 2017 workbook.

    • Grow Your Own PPM Solution – Phase 3: Implement Your PPM Solution
    • Portfolio Manager 2017 Operating Manual
    • Stakeholder Engagement Workbook
    • Portfolio Manager Debut Presentation for Portfolio Owners
    • Portfolio Manager Debut Presentation for Data Suppliers

    4. Outgrow your own PPM solution

    Develop an exit strategy from your home-grown solution to a commercial PPM toolset. In this video, we show a rapid transition from the Excel dataset shown on this page to a commercial solution from Meisterplan. Christoph Hirnle of Meisterplan is interviewed starting at 9 minutes.

    • None
    [infographic]

    Workshop: Grow Your Own PPM Solution

    Workshops offer an easy way to accelerate your project. If you are unable to do the project yourself, and a Guided Implementation isn't enough, we offer low-cost delivery of our project workshops. We take you through every phase of your project and ensure that you have a roadmap in place to complete your project successfully.

    1 Scope a Homegrown PPM Solution for Your Organization

    The Purpose

    Assess the current state of project portfolio management capability at your organization. The activities in this module will inform the next modules by exploring your organization’s current strengths and weaknesses and identifying areas that require improvement.

    Set up the workbook to generate a fully functional project portfolio workbook that will give you a high-level view into your portfolio.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A high-level review of your current project portfolio capability is used to decide whether a homegrown PPM solution is an appropriate choice

    Cost-benefit analysis is done to build a business case for supporting this choice

    Activities

    1.1 Review existing PPM strategy and processes.

    1.2 Perform a cost-benefit analysis.

    Outputs

    Confirmation of homegrown PPM solution as the right choice

    Expected benefits for the PPM solution

    2 Get to Know Portfolio Manager 2017

    The Purpose

    Define a list of requirements for your PPM solution that meets the needs of all stakeholders.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A fully customized PPM solution in your chosen platform

    Activities

    2.1 Introduction to Info-Tech's Portfolio Manager 2017: inputs, outputs, and the data model.

    2.2 Gather requirements for enhancements and customizations.

    Outputs

    Trained project/resource managers on the homegrown solution

    A wish list of enhancements and customizations

    3 Implement Your Homegrown PPM Solution

    The Purpose

    Determine an action plan regarding next steps for implementation.

    Implement your homegrown PPM solution. The activities outlined in this step will help to promote adoption of the tool throughout your organization.

    Key Benefits Achieved

    A set of processes to integrate the new homegrown PPM solution into existing PPM activities

    Plans for piloting the new processes, process improvement, and stakeholder communication

    Activities

    3.1 Plan to integrate your new solution into your PPM processes.

    3.2 Plan to pilot the new processes.

    3.3 Manage stakeholder communications.

    Outputs

    Portfolio Manager 2017 operating manual, which documents how Portfolio Manager 2017 is used to augment the PPM processes

    Plan for a pilot run and post-pilot evaluation for a wider rollout

    Communication plan for impacted PPM stakeholders

    Improve IT-Business Alignment Through an Internal SLA

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}455|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Operations Management
    • Parent Category Link: /i-and-o-process-management
    • The business is rarely satisfied with IT service levels, yet there is no clear definition of what is acceptable.
    • Dissatisfaction with service levels is often based on perception. Your uptime might be four 9s, but the business only remembers the outages.
    • IT is left trying to hit a moving target with a limited budget and no agreement on where services levels need to improve.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    • Business leaders have service level expectations regardless of whether there is a formal agreement. The SLA process enables IT to manage those expectations.
    • Track current service levels and report them in plain language (e.g. hours and minutes of downtime, not “how many 9s” which then need to be translated) to gain a clearer mutual understanding of current versus desired service levels.
    • Use past incidents to provide context (how much that hour of downtime actually impacted the business) in addition to a business impact analysis to define appropriate target service levels based on actual business need.

    Impact and Result

    Create an effective internal SLA by following a structured process to report current service levels and set realistic expectations with the business. This includes:

    • Defining the current achievable service level by establishing a metrics tracking and monitoring process.
    • Determining appropriate (not ideal) business needs.
    • Creating an SLA that clarifies expectations to reduce IT-business friction.

    Improve IT-Business Alignment Through an Internal SLA Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should create an internal SLA, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Scope the pilot project

    Establish the SLA pilot project and clearly document the problems and challenges that it will address.

    • Improve IT-Business Alignment Through an Internal SLA – Phase 1: Scope the Pilot Project
    • Internal SLA Process Flowcharts (PDF)
    • Internal SLA Process Flowcharts (Visio)
    • Build an Internal SLA Project Charter Template
    • Internal SLA Maturity Scorecard Tool

    2. Establish current service levels

    Expedite the SLA process by thoroughly, carefully, and clearly defining the current achievable service levels.

    • Improve IT-Business Alignment Through an Internal SLA – Phase 2: Determine Current Service Levels
    • Availability and Reliability SLA Metrics Tracking Template
    • Service Desk SLA Metrics Tracking Template
    • Service Catalog SLA Metrics Tracking Template

    3. Identify target service levels and create the SLA

    Create a living document that aligns business needs with IT targets by discovering the impact of your current service level offerings through a conversation with business peers.

    • Improve IT-Business Alignment Through an Internal SLA – Phase 3: Set Target Service Levels and Create the SLA
    • SLA Project Roadmap Tool
    • Availability Internal Service Level Agreement Template
    • Service Catalog Internal Service Level Agreement Template
    • Service Desk Internal Service Level Agreement Template
    • Internal SLA Executive Summary Presentation Template
    [infographic]

    Security Strategy

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}42|cart{/j2store}
    • Related Products: {j2store}42|crosssells{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.4/10
    • member rating average dollars saved: $33,431
    • member rating average days saved: 29
    • Parent Category Name: Security and Risk
    • Parent Category Link: /security-and-risk

    The challenge

    You may be experiencing one or more of the following:

    • You may not have sufficient security resources to handle all the challenges.
    • Security threats are prevalent. Yet many businesses struggle to embed systemic security thinking into their culture.
    • The need to move towards strategic planning of your security landscape is evident. How to get there is another matter.

    Our advice

    Insight

    To have a successful information security strategy, take these three factors into account:

    • Holistic: your view must include people, processes, and technology.
    • Risk awareness: Base your strategy on the actual risk profile of your company. And then add the appropriate best practices.
    • Business-aligned: When your strategic security plan demonstrates alignment with the business goals and supports it, embedding will go much more straightforward.

    Impact and results 

    • We have developed a highly effective approach to creating your security strategy. We tested and refined this for more than seven years with hundreds of different organizations.
    • We ensure alignment with business objectives.
    • We assess organizational risk and stakeholder expectations.
    • We enable a comprehensive current state assessment.
    • And we prioritize initiatives and build out a right-sized security roadmap.

     

    The roadmap

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    Get up to speed

    Read up on why you should build your customized information security strategy. Review our methodology and understand the four ways we can support you.

    Assess the security requirements

    It all starts with risk appetite, yes, but security is something you want to get right. Determine your organizations' security pressures and business goals, and then determine your security program's goals.

    • Build an Information Security Strategy – Phase 1: Assess Requirements
    • Information Security Requirements Gathering Tool (xls)
    • Information Security Pressure Analysis Tool (xls)

    Build your gap initiative

    Our best-of-breed security framework makes you perform a gap analysis between where you are and where you want to be (your target state). Once you know that, you can define your goals and duties.

    • Build an Information Security Strategy – Phase 2: Assess Gaps
    • Information Security Program Gap Analysis Tool (xls)

    Plan the implementation of your security strategy 

    With your design at this level, it is time to plan your roadmap.

    • Build an Information Security Strategy – Phase 3: Build the Roadmap

    Let it run and continuously improve. 

    Learn to use our methodology to manage security initiatives as you go. Identify the resources you need to execute the evolving strategy successfully.

    • Build an Information Security Strategy – Phase 4: Execute and Maintain
    • Information Security Strategy Communication Deck (ppt)
    • Information Security Charter (doc)

     

    Application Development Throughput

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}27|cart{/j2store}
    • Related Products: {j2store}27|crosssells{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: N/A
    • member rating average dollars saved: N/A
    • member rating average days saved: N/A
    • Parent Category Name: Applications
    • Parent Category Link: /applications

    The challenge

    • As we work more and more using agile techniques, teams tend to optimize their areas of responsibility.
    • IT will still release lower-quality applications when there is a lack of clarity around the core SDLC processes.
    • Software development teams continue to struggle with budget and time constraints within their releases.
    • Typically each group claims to be optimized, yet the final deliverable falls short of the expected quality.

    Our advice

    Insight

    • Database administrators know this all too well: Optimizing can you perform worse. The software development lifecycle (SDLC) must be optimized holistically, not per area or team.
    • Separate how you work from your framework. You do not need "agile" or "extreme" or "agifall" or "safe" to optimize your SDLC.
    • SDLC optimization is a continuous effort. Start from your team's current capabilities and improve over time.

    Impact and results 

    • You can assume proper accountability for the implementation and avoid over-reliance on the systems integrator.
    • Leverage the collective knowledge and advice of additional IT professionals
    • Review the pitfalls and lessons learned from failed integrations.
    • Manage risk at every stage.
    • Perform a self-assessment at various stages of the integration path.

    The roadmap

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    Get started.

    Read our executive brief to understand our approach to SDLC optimization and why we advocate a holistic approach for your company.

    Document your current state

    This phase helps you understand your business goals and priorities. You will document your current SDLC process and find where the challenges are.

    • Create a Horizontally Optimized SDLC to Better Meet Business Demands – Phase 1: Document the Current State of the SDLC (ppt)
    • SDLC Optimization Playbook (xls)

    Find out the root causes, define how to move forward, and set your target state

    • Create a Horizontally Optimized SDLC to Better Meet Business Demands – Phase 2: Define Root Causes, Determine Optimization Initiatives, and Define Target State (ppt)

    Develop the roll-out strategy for SDLC optimization

    Prioritize your initiatives and formalize them in a roll-out strategy and roadmap. Communicate your plan to all your stakeholders.

    • Create a Horizontally Optimized SDLC to Better Meet Business Demands – Phase 3: Develop a Rollout Strategy for SDLC Optimization (ppt)
    • SDLC Communication Template (ppt)

     

    Cost-Optimize Your Security Budget

    • Buy Link or Shortcode: {j2store}250|cart{/j2store}
    • member rating overall impact: 9.0/10 Overall Impact
    • member rating average dollars saved: $2,078 Average $ Saved
    • member rating average days saved: 2 Average Days Saved
    • Parent Category Name: Security Strategy & Budgeting
    • Parent Category Link: /security-strategy-and-budgeting
    • The security budget has been slashed and the team needs to do more with less.
    • Mitigating risk is still the top priority, only now we need to reassess effectiveness and efficiency to ensure we are getting the greatest level of protection for the least amount of money.

    Our Advice

    Critical Insight

    A cost-optimized security budget is one that has the greatest impact on risk for the least amount of money spent.

    Impact and Result

    • Focus on business needs and related risks. Review the risk-reduction efficacy of your people, processes, and technology and justify what can be cut and what must stay.
    • Info-Tech will guide you through this process, and by the end of this blueprint you will have a cost-optimized security budget and an executive presentation to explain your revised spending.

    Cost-Optimize Your Security Budget Research & Tools

    Start here – read the Executive Brief

    Read our concise Executive Brief to find out why you should cost-optimize your security budget, review Info-Tech’s methodology, and understand the four ways we can support you in completing this project.

    Besides the small introduction, subscribers and consulting clients within this management domain have access to:

    1. Cost-optimize your technology and managed services

    This phase will help you assess the efficacy of your current technology and service providers.

    • Threat and Risk Assessment Tool
    • In-House vs. Outsourcing Decision-Making Tool

    2. Cost-optimize your staffing

    This phase will help you assess if layoffs are necessary.

    • Security Employee Layoff Selection Tool

    3. Cost-optimize your security strategy

    This phase will help you revise the pending process-based initiatives in your security strategy.

    • Security Cost Optimization Workbook
    • Security Cost Optimization Executive Presentation
    [infographic]